Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual This Revision 3 of the Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility...

2

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LEVEL WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY FEDERAL REVIEW GROUP MANUAL REVISION 3 JUNE 2008 (This page intentionally left blank) Low-Level JVllsfe Disposal Fllcili~l' Federal Review Group il1allUlli Revision 3, June 200S Concurrence The Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual, Revision 3, is approved for use as of the most recent date below. Date Chair, Low-Level Waste Disposal Federal Review Group Andrew WalJo, 1II Deputy Director, Otlice of Nuclear Safety, Quality Assurance, and Environment Department of Energy OHlce of Health, Safety, and Security e C. WilJiams Associate Administrator for Infrastructure and Environment National Nuclear Security Administration Low-Level 'Vaste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group J1aJll/ai

3

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Management » Compliance » Low-Level Waste Program Management » Compliance » Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) The Office of Environmental Management (EM) Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) was established to fulfill the requirements contained in Section I.2.E(1)(a) of the Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, and exercised by the senior managers of EM. The LFRG assists EM senior managers in the review of documentation that supports the approval of performance assessments and composite analyses or appropriate Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)documents as described in Section II of the LFRG Charter. Through its efforts, the LFRG supports the issuance

4

Commissioning for Federal Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide describes building commissioning, recommissioning, retrocommissioning, and continuous commissioning for federal facilities.

5

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Facility Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject

6

Federal Facility Reporting | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Facility Reporting Federal Facility Reporting Federal Facility Reporting October 8, 2013 - 1:59pm Addthis Various legal authorities require agencies to report data on energy and water consumption and resource management efforts within Federal facilities. The Federal Energy Management Program collects this data to assess agency performance toward mandated goals on agency Energy/Sustainability Scorecards and presents it in annual reports to Congress. Find Federal facility reporting information related to: Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, Section 432, Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements: View information about requirements and data collected to track Federal facility compliance with requirements for performing facility evaluations, implementing and

7

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Regarding Coordination in Federal Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 On October 23, 2009, the Department of Energy and eight other Federal agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to improve coordination among project applicants, federal agencies, states and tribes involved in the siting and permitting process for electric transmission facilities on Federal land. The MOU will improve uniformity, consistency, and transparency by describing each entity's role and responsibilities when project applicants wish to build electric transmission facilities.

8

Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facility Energy Facility Energy Checklist to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Awards for Saving Energy Energy Action Month FAQs Facility Checklist Home Energy Checklist Office Checklist Energy Coordinators Commit to Efficiency Facility Energy Checklist This checklist outlines actions that conserve energy within facilities.

9

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council Federal Facilities Working Group Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Environmental Justice and Federal Facilities: recommendations for improving stakeholder relations between federal facilities and environmental justice communities, October 2004

10

Federal Facility Agreement progress report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The (SRS) Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) was made effective by the US. Environmental Protection Agency Region IV (EPA) on August 16, 1993. To meet the reporting requirements in Section XXV of the Agreement, the FFA Progress Report was developed. The FFA Progress Report is the first of a series of quarterly progress reports to be prepared by the SRS. As such this report describes the information and action taken to September 30, 1993 on the SRS units identified for investigation and remediation in the Agreement. This includes; rubble pits, runoff basins, retention basin, seepage basin, burning pits, H-Area Tank 16, and spill areas.

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

11

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Annual Energy Reports and Performance Annual Energy Reports and Performance Published Annual Reports Visit the FEMP Library to search for read FEMP Annual Reports to Congress on Federal Government Energy Management. For more information, contact Chris Tremper. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers information and data sets illustrating Federal agencies' annual progress in meeting facility energy goals. Additional detail about each agency's performance can be found in their Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans on the Performance.Gov website. Federal Facility Efficiency Investment and Progress toward Sustainability Goals: Get an overview of Federal progress made in facility energy management and sustainability based on preliminary fiscal year (FY) 2012 reported findings. (For facility-level data reported under Section 432 of EISA, see EISA CTS Reports and Data.)

12

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 On October 23, 2009, the Department of Energy and eight other Federal agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to improve coordination among project applicants, federal agencies, states and tribes involved in the siting and permitting process for electric transmission facilities on Federal land. The MOU will improve uniformity, consistency, and transparency by describing each entity's role and responsibilities when project applicants wish to build electric transmission facilities.

13

Strengthening Line Management Oversight and Federal Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14 14 Strengthening Line Management Oversight and Federal Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan Commercial Grade Dedication (CGD) August 2013 2 of 14 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Standard Review Plan (SRP) Commercial Grade Dedication (CGD) Applicability CD-0 CD-1 CD-2 CD-3 CD-4 Operation Post Operation August 2013 3 of 14 Table of Contents Objective ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Overview of Commercial Grade Dedication for Nuclear Facilities .............................................................. 4 Requirements ................................................................................................................................................ 5

14

Waste Treatment Facility Passes Federal Inspection, Completes Final  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waste Treatment Facility Passes Federal Inspection, Completes Final Waste Treatment Facility Passes Federal Inspection, Completes Final Milestone, Begins Startup Waste Treatment Facility Passes Federal Inspection, Completes Final Milestone, Begins Startup April 23, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Erik Simpson, 208-390-9464 Danielle Miller, 208-526-5709 The Idaho site today initiated the controlled, phased startup of a new waste treatment facility scheduled to begin treating 900,000 gallons of radioactive liquid waste stored in underground tanks at a former Cold War spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facility next month. A U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) operational readiness review team (made up of Subject Matter Experts across the country) in early April identified a dozen issues for the cleanup contractor CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC (CWI) to

15

Greening Federal Facilities: An Energy, Environmental, and Economic  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Greening Federal Facilities: An Energy, Environmental, and Economic Greening Federal Facilities: An Energy, Environmental, and Economic Resource Guide for Federal Facility managers and Designers; Second Edition Greening Federal Facilities: An Energy, Environmental, and Economic Resource Guide for Federal Facility managers and Designers; Second Edition A nuts-and-bolts resource guide compiled to increase energy and resource efficiency, cut waste, and improve the performance of Federal buildings and facilities. Greening Federal Facilities: An Energy, Environmental, and Economic Resource Guide for Federal Facility managers and Designers; Second Edition More Documents & Publications From Tragedy to Triumph - Resources for Rebuilding Green after Disaster, EERE (Fact Sheet) Rebuilding It Better; BTI-Greensburg, John Deere Dealership (Brochure)

16

Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy...

17

Federal Facility Agreement for the Laboratory for Energy-Related...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Energy Related Health Research Agreement Name Federal Facility Agreement for the Laboratory for Energy- Related Health Research State California Agreement Type Federal Facility...

18

Procuring Solar for Federal Facilities | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Facilities Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers is a Web guide for federal site managers, site contractors, and procurement specialists to help...

19

Environmental Justice and Federal Facilities: Recommendations for Improving Stakeholder Relations Between Federal Facilities and Enviornmental Justice Communities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

J J FEDERAL FACILITIES R IMPROVING S R BETWEEN FEDERAL F E JUSTICE COMMUNITIES October 2004 Prepared by the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council Waste and Facility Siting Subcommittee Federal Facilities Working Group NVIRONMENTAL USTICE AND ECOMMENDATIONS FOR TAKEHOLDER ELATIONS ACILITIES AND NVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND FEDERAL FACILITIES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS BETWEEN FEDERAL FACILITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES October 2004 Prepared by the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council Waste and Facility Siting Subcommittee Federal Facilities Working Group ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Federal Facilities Working Group of the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council's (NEJAC) Waste and Facility Siting Subcommittee wishes to acknowledge and thank the organizations and individuals

20

Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) Signed at Oak Ridge | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) Signed at Oak Ridge Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) Signed at Oak Ridge The Oak Ridge Reservation FFA was implemented on January 1, 1992. It is a...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

FEMP Helps Federal Facilities Develop Large-Scale Renewable Energy...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

FEMP Helps Federal Facilities Develop Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects FEMP Helps Federal Facilities Develop Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects August 21, 2013 - 12:00am...

22

Assisting Federal Facilities with Energy Conservation Technologies (AFFECT) Funding Opportunity  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FEMP provides project assistance through the Assisting Federal Facilities with Energy Conservation Technologies (AFFECT) funding opportunity. AFFECT provides grants for the development of capital projects to increase the energy efficiency and renewable energy investments at Federal agency facilities.

23

Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers SEPTEMBER 2010 Solar Energy: www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx PROCURING SOLAR ENERGY: A GUIDE FOR FEDERAL FACILITY DECISION MAKERS #12;September 2010 3 Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers Blaise

24

Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finance Facilities Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment A Guide for State, Local & Tribal Leaders and their Partners August 28, 2013 2 Contents 1 Foreword ................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... 6 3 Federal Finance Facilities At-A-Glance ................................................................................... 7 3.1 Matrix of Federal Finance Facilities by Type and Agency .............................................. 7 4 Profiles of Federal Finance Facilities Available for Clean Energy .......................................... 8

25

Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Laws & Regulations » Facility Reporting » Federal Facility Annual Laws & Regulations » Facility Reporting » Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance October 8, 2013 - 2:09pm Addthis Agencies are required to report annual progress made toward energy- and water-reduction goals. Agencies are required to report annual progress made toward energy- and water-reduction goals. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers information and data sets illustrating Federal agencies' annual progress in meeting facility energy goals. Additional detail about each agency's performance can be found in their Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans on the Performance.Gov website. Federal Facility Efficiency Investment and Progress toward Sustainability Goals: Get an overview of Federal progress made in facility energy

26

Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements October 8, 2013 - 2:02pm Addthis Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is responsible for tracking Federal agency progress toward meeting Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 for Federal facility energy and water management and benchmarking. The EISA 432 Compliance Tracking System (EISA 432 CTS) tracks agency

27

Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Reporting » Energy Independence and Facility Reporting » Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements October 8, 2013 - 2:02pm Addthis Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is responsible for tracking Federal agency progress toward meeting Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 for Federal facility energy and water management and benchmarking.

28

MRAP MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

MRAP MRAP MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT May/June 2005 Report Period: May 1 -June 30, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS DOE constmction, as identified in the Millsite Restoration Plan, was substantially completed on June 3. Seeding of disturbed areas was completed on June 15. MSG DOE completed constmction of the permeable reactive treatment cell and initiated operations in June. The cell is an enhancement to the existing pe1meable reactive ban·ier and was designed to alleviate ground water mounding. MVP Approximately one cubic yard of contaminated material was identified in a City of Monticello excavation near the golf course. This material was transferred to the Temporary Storage Facility located at the DOE Monticello Office.

29

Federal Facility Consolidated Annual Reporting Requirements | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Reporting » Federal Facility Facility Reporting » Federal Facility Consolidated Annual Reporting Requirements Federal Facility Consolidated Annual Reporting Requirements October 8, 2013 - 2:07pm Addthis Section 548(a) of National Energy Conservation Policy Act (NEPCA, 42 U.S.C. 8258(a)) requires each Federal agency to submit to the U.S. Department of Energy an annual report describing activities to meet the energy management requirements of Section 543 of NECPA (42 U.S.C. 8253). Information and data collected from the agencies will be used to develop DOE's Annual Report to Congress on Federal Government Energy Management. Annual GHG and Sustainability Data Report for FY 2013 Reporting The Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) Annual GHG and Sustainability Data Report, Version 4.2 is to be used by top-tier Federal

30

Waste treatment facility passes federal inspection, completes final  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

23, 2012 23, 2012 Media Contact: Danielle Miller, 208-526-5709 Erik Simpson, 208-390-9464 Waste treatment facility passes federal inspection, completes final milestone, begins startup The Idaho site today initiated the controlled, phased startup of a new waste treatment facility scheduled to begin treating 900,000 gallons of radioactive liquid waste stored in underground tanks at a former Cold War spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facility next month. An exterior view of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit A U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) operational readiness review team (made up of Subject Matter Experts across the country) in early April identified a dozen issues for the cleanup contractor CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC (CWI) to resolve before the 53,000-square-foot Integrated Waste Treatment Unit

31

Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities October 4, 2013 - 4:41pm Addthis The Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities provides significant financial evidence from research findings and case studies that sustainable design is a smart business choice. The 20-page brochure and the full document provide data and information indicating that sustainable design does not have to increase first costs and yields economic, social, and environmental benefits to building owners and society. Read the Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities brochure. Download the Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities full document. Contact For additional information about the Business Case for Sustainable Design

32

Federal Facility Reporting and Data | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

provides information and tools to help agencies report annual energy and water consumption and resource management efforts within Federal facilities. FEMP also compiles and...

33

Procuring Solar for Federal Facilities | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Implementation - implement the project, dependant on the financing selected. Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers provides an overview for...

34

Adopting LED Technology: What Federal Facility Managers Need to Know  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document describes the presentation slides for the "Adopting LED Technology: What Federal Facility Managers Need to Know" webinar that took place on September 11, 2014.

35

Federal Facility Reporting and Data | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Management Program (FEMP) provides information and tools to help agencies report annual energy and water consumption and resource management efforts within Federal facilities....

36

EISA Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for how these activities fit into the comprehensive approach to facility energy and water management, as outlined by the statute. Federal Building Energy Use Benchmarking...

37

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

November/December 2004 November/December 2004 Report Period: November 1- December 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Program Directive for the wildlife survey is on schedule for completion by January 15. Comments from the Biological Technical Assistance group have been incorporated. MRAP A punchlist of mill site restoration items was prepared. DOE and the City of Monticello have agreed upon which entity will perform each item on the punchlist. MVP No significant activities to report. FF A Monthly Report November- December 2004 Page 2 of5 STATUS MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT November/December 2004 Report Period: November 1- December 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath Operable Units I and II DOE and the City of Monticello (City) are exploring the possibility of transferring the former

38

Idaho Site Launches Startup of Waste Treatment Facility Following Federal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Launches Startup of Waste Treatment Facility Following Launches Startup of Waste Treatment Facility Following Federal Inspection, DOE Milestone Idaho Site Launches Startup of Waste Treatment Facility Following Federal Inspection, DOE Milestone April 23, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis A controlled, phased startup of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit began today after the facility passed a federal inspection. A controlled, phased startup of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit began today after the facility passed a federal inspection. A view of the interior of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit. A view of the interior of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit. A controlled, phased startup of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit began today after the facility passed a federal inspection. A view of the interior of the Integrated Waste

39

Idaho Site Launches Startup of Waste Treatment Facility Following Federal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Idaho Site Launches Startup of Waste Treatment Facility Following Idaho Site Launches Startup of Waste Treatment Facility Following Federal Inspection, DOE Milestone Idaho Site Launches Startup of Waste Treatment Facility Following Federal Inspection, DOE Milestone April 23, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis A controlled, phased startup of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit began today after the facility passed a federal inspection. A controlled, phased startup of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit began today after the facility passed a federal inspection. A view of the interior of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit. A view of the interior of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit. A controlled, phased startup of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit began today after the facility passed a federal inspection. A view of the interior of the Integrated Waste

40

Testing Promising Technologies: A Role for Federal Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

I S T R A T I O N I S T R A T I O N Testing Promising Technologies: A Role for Federal Facilities Presented to: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group April 18, 2011 Presented by: Jack Callahan, P.E., CEM, CMVP Emerging Technology Program Manager BPA Energy Efficiency B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Overview of Presentation  Overview of BPA's efforts on emerging technologies (E3T)  Review some technologies  What BPA provides  How you can participate 2 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

The munitions provisions of the Federal Facility Compliance Act  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFCA) was signed by President Bush on October 6, 1992. This Act amends the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the primary law governing hazardous waste management in the US The most significant provision of the FFCA was the waiver of sovereign immunity. This waiver subjects Federal facilities to the same ``incentives`` as the private sector for compliance. While the waiver has broad implications for all Federal facilities, other provisions of the FFCA impact specific sectors of the Federal complex. The focus of this paper is the FFCA Munitions Provisions, which have the potential to change some aspects of the structure of munitions management within the military. The Munitions Provisions, contained in Section 107 of the FFCA, modifies Section 3004 of RCRA by adding a new subsection (y) on Munitions. Section 107 requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop, after consultation with the Department of Defense (DOD) and appropriate State officials, regulations identifying when military munitions (including conventional and chemical munitions) become hazardous waste, and to provide for the safe transportation and storage of such waste. The FFCA requires EPA to promulgate the final ``Munitions Rule`` by October 6, 1994. These are the only provisions of the FFCA that require a new rulemaking. It is clear that the Munitions Rule could have a significant effect on the way in which DOD manages munitions. Demilitarization, range management, training activities, and emergency response actions may be affected. It is important for DOD, the Services, and individual installations, to be aware of potential impacts of the FFCA on munitions management operations. The purpose of this paper is to review several important munitions Rule issues, and to discuss potential impacts of these issues.

Kimmell, T.A. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States); Green, D.R. [Brown and Root Environmental, Houston, TX (United States); Queen, R. [Army Environmental Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (United States)

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

Greening Federal Facilities: An Energy, Environmental, and Economic Resource Guide for Federal Facility managers and Designers; Second Edition  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FEDERAL FACILITIES FEDERAL FACILITIES An Energy, Environmental, and Economic Resource Guide for Federal Facility Managers and Designers SECOND EDITION DOE/GO-102001-1165 Section DOE/GO-102001-1165 NREL/BK-710-29267 May 2001 i Greening Federal Facilities An Energy, Environmental, and Economic Resource Guide for Federal Facility Managers and Designers SECOND EDITION "Then I say the earth belongs to each ... generation during its course, fully and in its own right, no generation can contract debts greater than may be paid during the course of its own existence." Thomas Jefferson, September 6, 1789 Produced for: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program Produced by: BuildingGreen, Inc., Brattleboro, Vermont Under:

43

Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment "Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment" is a resource guide that lists the various federal financing programs for which energy efficiency and clean energy qualify - meant to make it easier for state, local and tribal leaders, along with their partners in the private sector, to find capital for energy efficiency and clean energy projects. This first-edition guide is a product of a cooperative effort among seven federal agencies, including the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, Transportation and Treasury, along with the

44

Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment "Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment" is a resource guide that lists the various federal financing programs for which energy efficiency and clean energy qualify - meant to make it easier for state, local and tribal leaders, along with their partners in the private sector, to find capital for energy efficiency and clean energy projects. This first-edition guide is a product of a cooperative effort among seven federal agencies, including the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, Transportation and Treasury, along with the

45

Monticello Mill site Federal Facility Agreement, December 22, 1988  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

: Monticello Vicinity Properties NPL Site and Monticello Millsite Federal Facility AgreemPage 1 of 36 : Monticello Vicinity Properties NPL Site and Monticello Millsite Federal Facility AgreemPage 1 of 36 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Monticello (Utah) Site: Monticello Vicinity Properties NPL Site and Monticello Millsite Federal Facility Agreement Pursuant to CERCLA Section 120, December 22, 1988 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VIII and THE STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY IN THE MATTER: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MONTICELLO (UTAH) SITE: MONTICELLO VICINITY PROPERTIES NPL SITE and MONTICELLO MILLSITE Federal Facility Agreement pursuant to Section 120 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and ) FEDERAL FACILITY ) AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO

46

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment This manual...

47

Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects Document provides a framework for...

48

Greening Federal Facilities: An Energy, Environmental, and Economic Resource Guide for Federal Facility Managers and Designers; Second Edition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Greening Federal Facilities, Second Edition, is a nuts-and-bolts resource guide compiled to increase energy and resource efficiency, cut waste, and improve the performance of Federal buildings and facilities. The guide highlights practical actions that facility managers, design and construction staff, procurement officials, and facility planners can take to save energy and money, improve the comfort and productivity of employees, and benefit the environment. It supports a national effort to promote energy and environmental efficiency in the nation's 500,000 Federal buildings and facilities. Topics covered include current Federal regulations; environmental and energy decision-making; site and landscape issues; building design; energy systems; water and wastewater; materials; waste management, and recycling; indoor environmental quality; and managing buildings.

Wilson, A.

2001-05-16T23:59:59.000Z

49

Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facilities...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Thomas L. McCall, Jr. http:www.em.doe.govffaaortsca.html 4252001 Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facilities Compliance Agree.. Page 12 of 26 Deputy...

50

Federal CHP Potential 1 Does your facility have CHP  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. The Federal building types with greatest CHP potential are hospitals, industrial, and R&D facilities. Figure 1) systems provide thermal energy for buildings or processes while at the same time generating electricity extraordinary efficiency and environmental benefits. The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Federal Energy

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

51

Standard Review Plan Preparation for Facility Operations Strengthening Line Management Oversight and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Standard Review Plan Standard Review Plan Preparation for Facility Operations Strengthening Line Management Oversight and Federal Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities August 2013 2 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Standard Review Plan (SRP) Preparation for Facility Operations Applicability CD-0 CD-1 CD-2 CD-3 CD-4 Operation Post Operation August 2013 3 Table of Contents Objective ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Requirements .................................................................................................................................. 4 Primary References ......................................................................................................................... 6

52

Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews Draft for Public Review and Comment March 2013 2 Table of Contents: I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Questions and Answers .................................................................................................................... 5 A. Stage 1: Preliminary Questions ................................................................................................. 5 1. How Does NEPA and CEQA Terminology Differ? .................................................... 5 a. "Action" (NEPA) versus "Project" (CEQA) ................................................ 5

53

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Facility Engineering...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Facility Engineering Services KCP, LLC - November 2008 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Facility Engineering Services KCP, LLC - November 2008 November 2008 This report...

54

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Facility Engineering...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Facility Engineering Services KCP, LLC - September 2012 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Facility Engineering Services KCP, LLC - September 2012 September 2012...

55

Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facility Energy Checklist Facility Energy Checklist This checklist outlines actions that conserve energy within facilities. For Your Buildings Lower thermostat settings. Match HVAC schedules to occupancy schedules. Lower setback temperatures. Optimize morning warmup and night setback controls. Reduce/eliminate major sources of infiltration. Install a desiccant dehumidification system. Minimize use of outside air for process ventilation. Educate employees on building systems and energy efficiency measures. Check/adjust combustion efficiency of gas-fired equipment. Minimize the use of gas-fired refrigeration equipment. Check for ways to control solar gain to reduce the cooling load on buildings, including cool roofs or solar shading on windows PDF Install revolving doors. Install energy-efficient lighting and occupancy sensors.

56

Federal Facilities Liaison Weighs in on EM Achievements, Challenges at  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Facilities Liaison Weighs in on EM Achievements, Challenges Federal Facilities Liaison Weighs in on EM Achievements, Challenges at Savannah River Site Federal Facilities Liaison Weighs in on EM Achievements, Challenges at Savannah River Site December 27, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Shelly Wilson, third from right, participates in a roundtable discussion at the Intergovernmental Meeting with the DOE in New Orleans this month. Also pictured are Maryland Delegate Sally Jameson, left to right, Office of River Protection Deputy Manager Stacy Charboneau, Willie Preacher, Director of DOE-related projects for Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and Eddy County, N.M., Commissioner Roxanne Lara. Shelly Wilson, third from right, participates in a roundtable discussion at the Intergovernmental Meeting with the DOE in New Orleans this month. Also

57

Federal Facility Agreement for the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Facility Agreement for the Paducah Gaseous Federal Facility Agreement for the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant State Kentucky Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA/RCRA Scope Summary Ensure that the environmental impacts of activities at the Site are investigated and appropriate response actions are taken. Parties U.S. DOE; Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet; U.S. EPA Date 2/01/1998 SCOPE * Ensure all releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants are addressed to achieve comprehensive remediation of the site. * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring response actions in accordance with CERCLA, RCRA, and Kentucky Law. * Facilitate cooperation, exchange of information, and participation of the Parties and

58

Federal Facilities Liaison Weighs in on EM Achievements, Challenges at  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Facilities Liaison Weighs in on EM Achievements, Challenges Federal Facilities Liaison Weighs in on EM Achievements, Challenges at Savannah River Site Federal Facilities Liaison Weighs in on EM Achievements, Challenges at Savannah River Site December 27, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Shelly Wilson, third from right, participates in a roundtable discussion at the Intergovernmental Meeting with the DOE in New Orleans this month. Also pictured are Maryland Delegate Sally Jameson, left to right, Office of River Protection Deputy Manager Stacy Charboneau, Willie Preacher, Director of DOE-related projects for Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and Eddy County, N.M., Commissioner Roxanne Lara. Shelly Wilson, third from right, participates in a roundtable discussion at the Intergovernmental Meeting with the DOE in New Orleans this month. Also

59

SRS - Area Completion Projects - Federal Facility Agreement and Supporting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5/2013 5/2013 SEARCH GO spacer Administrative Record File/Information Repository File Federal Facility Agreement and Supporting Documentation General Information and Technologies Public Involvement Home SRS Home Area Completion Projects Federal Facility Agreement and Supporting Documentation * Federal Facility Agreement -The document that directs the comprehensive remediation of the Savannah River Site Appendix Affected by Modification: Appendix D Issuance of EPA and SCDHEC approved Revision.0 Appendix D for Fiscal Year 2013 (Print Date: 08/27/2013). The SCDHEC provided a comment on the Revision 0 Appendix D for Fiscal Year 2013 (Print Date: 08/27/2013) on Spetember 26, 2013. The EPA provided conditional approval, pending resolution of the SCDHEC's comment, of theRevision 0 Appendix D for Fiscal Year 2013 (Print Date: 08/27/2013) on October 30, 2013.

60

Monticello Mill site Federal Facility Agreement, December 22, 1988 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Monticello Monticello Agreement Name Monticello (Utah) Site: Monticello Vicinity Properties NPL Site and Monticello Millsite Federal Facility Agreement Pursuant to CERCLA Section 120, December 22, 1988 State Utah Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; US EPA; State of Utah Department of Environmental Health Date 12/22/1988 SCOPE * Identify Interim Remedial Action (IRA) alternatives, if any, which are appropriate at the Site prior to the implementation of final remedial actions for the Site. * Evaluate all past investigative and response actions taken at the Site and documented

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Weldon Spring Site Federal Facility Agreement  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

the period of (10) days to at least (90) days for the reasons stated in comment 2 of this section. Ten days is a grossly inadequate period of time to consider and review documents...

62

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT Report Period: October 1- December 31, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Ray Plieness HIGHLIGHTS The Final Report-2005 Avian Wetland Surveys at the Monticello Mill Tailings Site and the Final Report-Monticello Mill Tailings Site Macroinvertebrate Sampling for 2005 were transmitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) on December 13. These reports are required under the Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III Post-Record of Decision Monitoring Plan, Section 6.0 Biomonitoring Plan, to determine whether selenium levels are present in environmental media at concentrations that could cause adverse effects on ecological receptors. MRAP The draft-flnal2005 Annual Inspection of the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) and

63

Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August.. Page 1 of 18 Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August.. Page 1 of 18 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 NOTE: As of December 16, 1996, for the Oak Ridge Reservation this National Agreement was superseded by the Oak Ridge Reservation Polychlorinated Biphenyl Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (ORR-PCB-FFCA). The ORR-PCB-FFCA will be available soon. Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Definitions III. Covered Materials IV. Statement of Facts & Conclusions of Law V. Compliance Requirements VI. Submittal and Review of Annual Status Report VII. Notification VIII. Dispute Resolution IX. Extensions

64

Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Guide provides U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) line management organizations with guidance that may be useful to them in effectively and efficiently implementing the requirements of DOE O 226.1B, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy, dated April 25, 2011, as applied to Federal line management of hazard category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities.

65

Federal Facility Efficiency Investment and Progress toward Sustainability Goals  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Chris Tremper, Program Analyst chris.tremper@ee.doe.gov 202-586-7632 Federal Facility Efficiency Investment and Progress toward Sustainability Goals July 31, 2013 Overall Facility Goal Progress, FY 2012 Goal/Requirement for FY 2012 FY 2012 Federal Performance E.O. 13423/EISA: Reduce energy intensity (Btu/GSF) by 21% compared to 2003; 30% reduction required in FY 2015. Government decreased energy intensity by 20.6% in FY 2012 relative to FY 2003 17 of 24 Scorecard agencies achieved the goal. EPACT 2005/E.O. 13423: Use renewable electric energy equivalent to at least 5% of total electricity use; at least half of which must come from sources developed after January 1,

66

Federal Facility Efficiency Investment and Progress toward Sustainability Goals  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Chris Tremper, Program Analyst chris.tremper@ee.doe.gov 202-586-7632 Federal Facility Efficiency Investment and Progress toward Sustainability Goals July 31, 2013 Overall Facility Goal Progress, FY 2012 Goal/Requirement for FY 2012 FY 2012 Federal Performance E.O. 13423/EISA: Reduce energy intensity (Btu/GSF) by 21% compared to 2003; 30% reduction required in FY 2015. Government decreased energy intensity by 20.6% in FY 2012 relative to FY 2003 17 of 24 Scorecard agencies achieved the goal. EPACT 2005/E.O. 13423: Use renewable electric energy equivalent to at least 5% of total electricity use; at least half of which must come from sources developed after January 1,

67

The Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

F F E D E R A L E N E R G Y M A N A G E M E N T P R O G R A M FEDERAL FACILITIES SUSTAINABLE DESIGN The Business Case for IN U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bringing you a prosperous future where energy is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable The Business Case for SUSTAINABLE DESIGN On the cover: National Institutes of Health, Louis Stokes Laboratories/Building 50, Bethesda, MD Sandia National Laboratories' Process and Environmental Technology Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM Zion National Park Visitors Center, Springdale, UT IN FEDERAL FACILITIES Preface The ethic of good economic and environmental stewardship is well established in the Federal government. ce to the sustainable use of natural resources runs deep. et, as concerns about the environmental and societal

68

The Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

F F E D E R A L E N E R G Y M A N A G E M E N T P R O G R A M FEDERAL FACILITIES SUSTAINABLE DESIGN The Business Case for IN U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bringing you a prosperous future where energy is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable The Business Case for SUSTAINABLE DESIGN On the cover: National Institutes of Health, Louis Stokes Laboratories/Building 50, Bethesda, MD Sandia National Laboratories' Process and Environmental Technology Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM Zion National Park Visitors Center, Springdale, UT IN FEDERAL FACILITIES Preface The ethic of good economic and environmental stewardship is well established in the Federal government. ce to the sustainable use of natural resources runs deep. et, as concerns about the environmental and societal

69

California Federal Facilities: Rate-Responsive Buidling Operating for Deeper Cost and Energy Savings  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Fact sheet from the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) describes rate-responsive building operations for cost and energy savings in California federal facilities.

70

Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment resource guide lists the various federal financing programs for which energy efficiency and clean...

71

Savannah River Site Federal Facility Agreement, January 15, 1993 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site Site Agreement Name Savannah River Site Federal Facility Agreement Under Section 120 of CERCLA, January 15, 1993 State South Carolina Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Ensure that the environmental impacts associated with past and present activities at the Savannah River Site are thoroughly investigated and that appropriate response actions are taken to protect the public health, welfare, and the environment. Parties DOE; US EPA; South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) Date 1/15/1993 SCOPE * Ensure that the environmental impacts associated with past and present activities at the Savannah River Site are thoroughly investigated and that appropriate response actions are taken to protect the public health, welfare, and the environment.

72

Mound Plant Federal Facility Agreement, July 15, 1993 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

United States Environmental Protection Agency Region V United States Environmental Protection Agency Region V and the State of Ohio Federal Facility Agreement State Ohio Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary DOE shall identify Interim Remedial Actions (IRAs) alternatives and implement US EPA and OEPA approved remedies for the site in accordance with CERCLA Parties EPA; Ohio EPA (OEPA); DOE Date 07/15/1993 SCOPE * Identify Interim Remedial Action (IRA) alternatives which include Remedial Investigations (RI) and Feasibility Studies (FS); design and implement US EPA and OEPA approved remedies for the Mound site in accordance with CERCLA. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * After approval of remedial design and action plans, DOE shall prepare and provide to U.S. EPA and OEPA written monthly progress reports.

73

Performing Energy Security Assessments- A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide describes the best practices and recommended process for federal facility managers to prepare for the following sections of a facilitys energy security plan: vulnerability assessments, energy preparedness and operations plans, and remedial action plans.

74

Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Reviewing Measurement & Verification Plans Reviewing Measurement & Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects February 2007 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy This document was developed for the U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program by Nexant, Inc., and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. This document is posted on FEMP's web site at www.eere.energy.gov/femp/financing/ . [Headers and footers only revised 12/08] Reviewing M&V Plans Contents REVIEWING MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION PLANS FOR FEDERAL ESPC PROJECTS ............................................................................................................ 1 STEP 1 - PREPARE CUSTOM REPORT AND CHECKLIST FROM TEMPLATE .......................... 1

75

Federal Register Notice for Draft Addendum to Environmental Review...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Notice for Draft Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas from the United States Federal Register Notice for Draft Addendum to...

76

Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document provides a framework for implementing uniform and consistent reviews of measurement and verification (M&V) plans for Federal energy savings performance contract (ESPC) projects.

77

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

California Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) have jointly prepared the handbook "NEPA and CEQA: Integrating Federal and State Environmental Reviews." The handbook...

78

Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC Projects The purpose of this document is to provide a framework for implementing uniform and consistent reviews of...

79

FEMP Helps Federal Facilities Develop Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

FEMP developed a guide to help federal agencies, as well as the developers and financiers that work with them, to successfully install large-scale renewable energy projects at federal facilities.

80

Facility Representative Program, Criteria & Review Approach Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This page provides Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADS) to assist Facility Representatives. Please submit your CRADS for posting by sending them to the HQ FR Program Manager. Please include the subject, date, and a contact person.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Weldon Spring Site Federal Facility Agreement UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Site Site Federal Facility Agreement UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VII UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE MATTER OF: The United States Department of Energy's Weldon Spring Site, St. Charles, Missouri Docket No. CERCLA-07-2006-0161 FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT FOR THE WELDON SPRING SITE Weldon Spring Site Federal Facility Agreement i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT.............................................................................................. 1 II. JURISDICTION ...................................................................................................................... 2 III. PARTIES BOUND .................................................................................................................

82

Webinar: Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Video recording and text version of the webinar titled, Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, originally presented on May 8, 2012.

83

Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This presentation, given through the DOE's Technical Assitance Program (TAP), provides information on Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment.

84

MSGOUID MONTICELLO PROJECTS ·FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

MSGOUID MSGOUID MONTICELLO PROJECTS ·FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT Report Period: Aprill -June 30, 2006 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS DOE submitted the draft Consolidated LTSM Administrative mid Operating Procedures Manual to EPA and UDEQ on May 4, 2006. Document transmittal met the stipulated penalty milestone of May 6, 2006. Semi-annual ground water and surface water monitoring was completed in May 2006 as scheduled. Three FY 2006 Program Directives were prepared and issued for bio-monitoring tasks to assess selenium accumulation in the environment and identify potential ecological receptors. All field work for FY 2006 bio-monitoring task was completed (five waterfowl surveys in May and June, sediment and surface water sample collection in April for selenium analysis,

85

Cold vacuum drying facility 90% design review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains review comment records for the CVDF 90% design review. Spent fuels retrieved from the K Basins will be dried at the CVDF. It has also been recommended that the Multi-Conister Overpacks be welded, inspected, and repaired at the CVD Facility before transport to dry storage.

O`Neill, C.T.

1997-05-02T23:59:59.000Z

86

EISA Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy Management Program is responsible for tracking Federal agency progress toward meeting Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.

87

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 Memorandum of Understanding...

88

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site K-West Annex Facility...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

K-West Annex Facility - April 2014 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site K-West Annex Facility - April 2014 April 2014 Review of the Hanford Site K-West Annex Facility...

89

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product...

90

3rd Annual National CHP Roadmap Workshop CHP and DER for Federal Facilities EPA CHP Partnership Meeting, October 2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Announcement letter for 3rd Annual National CHP Roadmap Workshop, A Combined Event for Federal Facility Managers and CHP Advocates

91

Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

site. It is specifically targeted to managers of federal buildings and sites, contracting officers, energy and sustainability officers, and regional procurement managers....

92

Greening Federal Facilities: An Energy, Environmental, and Economic...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

4 1.3 Current Federal Regulations ... 6 Part II ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY DECISION-MAKING 2.1 Green Teams - Innovations in Planning, Design, and Operation...

93

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, December 9, 1991  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Engineering Laboratory ("INEL") Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, December 9, 1991 Engineering Laboratory ("INEL") Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, December 9, 1991 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Idaho National Engineering Laboratory ("INEL") Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, December 9, 1991 THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION 10, THE STATE OF IDAHO, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE, AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY IN THE MATTER OF: ) FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT ) AND CONSENT ORDER THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ) IDAHO NATIONAL ENGINEERING ) LABORATORY ("INEL"), ) ) Administrative Docket Number: ) 1088-06-120 Idaho Falls, Idaho ) Table of Contents I. Jurisdiction II. Definitions III. Parties IV. Statement Of Purpose

94

New Course Teaches Best Practices for Water Management for Federal Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FEMP now offers Best Practices for Comprehensive Water Management for Federal Facilities, a new e-Training core course providing skills to increase efficiency and reduce water use through O&M practices and water-efficient technologies.

95

Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, in collaboration with the Member Agencies of the Steering Committee (Member Agencies) created under Executive Order 13604 of March 22, 2012, and pursuant to the June 7, 2013 Transmission Presidential Memorandum, is seeking public input on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process. The proposed IIP Process is intended to improve interagency and intergovernmental coordination focused on ensuring that project proponents develop and submit accurate and complete information early in the project planning process to facilitate efficient

96

Facility Disposition Safety Strategy RM | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Facility Disposition Safety Strategy RM Facility Disposition Safety Strategy RM The Facility Disposition Safety Strategy (FDSS) Review Module is a tool that assists DOE federal...

97

Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades  

Energy Savers [EERE]

the federal government, particularly: Gary Bojes, Nivin Elgohary, Todd Campbell, Bill Smith and Doug O'Brien at the U.S. Department of Agriculture; Ian Adams, Ken Alston, Luke...

98

Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Performing Energy Security Assessments - Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Facilities to be Assessed...........................................................................................................................1 2. BEGINNING THE ENERGY SECURITY ASSESSMENT PROCESS ............................... 2 2.1 Assign an Energy Security Manager .........................................................................................................2 2.2 Define the Mission of the Installation

99

Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Performing Energy Security Assessments - Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Facilities to be Assessed...........................................................................................................................1 2. BEGINNING THE ENERGY SECURITY ASSESSMENT PROCESS ............................... 2 2.1 Assign an Energy Security Manager .........................................................................................................2 2.2 Define the Mission of the Installation

100

Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Guide was developed in support of DOE O 226.1B to provide guidance that may be useful to DOE line management organizations in meeting the provisions of that order when applied to nuclear facilities.

2014-04-14T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Guide was developed in support of DOE O 226.1B to provide guidance that may be useful to DOE line management organizations in meeting the provisions of that order when applied to nuclear facilities.

2013-04-04T23:59:59.000Z

102

Low-Energy Building Design Guidelines: Energy-Efficient Design for New Federal Facilities. Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Booklet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Introduction Introduction Incorporating energy efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainable green design features into all Federal buildings has become a top priority in recent years for facilities managers, designers, contracting officers, and others in government buildings procurement. These progressive design strategies have been formalized through Executive Order 13123 (known as Greening the Government through Efficient Energy Management), which was issued on June 3, 1999. There are significant oppor- tunities to accomplish the goals set forth in the executive order, whether in new building design or in the context of renovations. This guidebook addresses the first category-the design process for new Federal facilities. Because energy-efficient buildings reduce both resource depletion and the

103

Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 May 2013 Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities This report summarizes and analyzes the results of independent reviews of IVR and associated processes at eight DOE sites conducted by Independent Oversight from August 2011 to September 2012. The purpose of the Independent Oversight review was to evaluate the processes and methods used for verifying the implementation of safety basis hazard controls and periodically re-verifying that the controls remain in place. Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation

104

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews (Final)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

CEQ and the California Governors Office of Planning and Research (OPR) have jointly prepared the handbook NEPA and CEQA: Integrating Federal and State Environmental Reviews. The handbook provides practitioners with an overview of NEPA and CEQA as well as suggestions for developing a single environmental review process that can meet the requirements of both statutes. The handbook also provides a framework for a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between two or more agencies entering into a joint NEPA/ CEQA review process, and addresses the California Energy Commission licensing process, which takes the place of the CEQA process for certain power plants

105

Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facilities...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

in Attachment I - Portsmouth and Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plants Remedial Implementation Plan. * EPA shall review all deliverables generated by DOE pursuant to this Agreement. *...

106

Largest Federally-Owned Wind Farm Breaks Ground at U.S. Weapons Facility |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Largest Federally-Owned Wind Farm Breaks Ground at U.S. Weapons Largest Federally-Owned Wind Farm Breaks Ground at U.S. Weapons Facility Largest Federally-Owned Wind Farm Breaks Ground at U.S. Weapons Facility August 13, 2013 - 10:54am Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON - Building on President Obama's Climate Action Plan, which calls for steady, responsible steps to reduce carbon pollution, the Energy Department today broke ground on the nation's largest federally-owned wind project at the Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas. Once completed, this five-turbine 11.5 megawatt project will power more than 60 percent of the plant with clean, renewable wind energy and reduce carbon emissions by over 35,000 metric tons per year - equivalent to taking 7,200 cars off the road. The Pantex Plant is the primary site for the assembly, disassembly,

107

Largest Federally-Owned Wind Farm Breaks Ground at U.S. Weapons Facility |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Largest Federally-Owned Wind Farm Breaks Ground at U.S. Weapons Largest Federally-Owned Wind Farm Breaks Ground at U.S. Weapons Facility Largest Federally-Owned Wind Farm Breaks Ground at U.S. Weapons Facility August 13, 2013 - 10:54am Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON - Building on President Obama's Climate Action Plan, which calls for steady, responsible steps to reduce carbon pollution, the Energy Department today broke ground on the nation's largest federally-owned wind project at the Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas. Once completed, this five-turbine 11.5 megawatt project will power more than 60 percent of the plant with clean, renewable wind energy and reduce carbon emissions by over 35,000 metric tons per year - equivalent to taking 7,200 cars off the road. The Pantex Plant is the primary site for the assembly, disassembly,

108

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, December 9, 1991 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order State Idaho Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Ensure that the environmental impacts associated with releases or hazardous substances are thoroughly investigated and that appropriate response action are taken. Parties DOE; US EPA; State of Idaho Date 12/9/1991 SCOPE * Ensure that the environmental impacts associated with releases or hazardous substances are thoroughly investigated and that appropriate response action are taken. * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, prioritizing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions. * Supersede the Consent Order and Compliance Agreement Docket No. 1086-05-16- 3008/3013, executed on July 10, 1987.

109

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Compliance Order, February 24, 1997 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Compliance Order HWCA 96/97-5002 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 2/24/1997 SCOPE * Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at LLNL. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * The Compliance Plan Volume of the STP provides overall schedules for achieving

110

Independent Oversight Review, DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Headquarters Facilities - March DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 Independent Oversight Review, DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 March 2002 Review of the Headquarters Facilities Emergency Response Plans The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance conducted a review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters facilities emergency response plans in February 2002. The purpose of this review was to assess the Department's readiness to respond to emergency events, such as fires and hazardous material releases (inside and outside the building), that occur at any of the following facilities: the two primary DOE Headquarters facilities, namely, the James V. Forrestal building, which is located in Washington, D.C., and the main Germantown, Maryland, facility; and the 270 Corporate Center and Cloverleaf

111

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document details the peer review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement portfolio.

112

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement, June 29, 1992 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site 300) Site 300) Agreement Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120, June 29, 1992 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; USEPA; California Department of Toxic Substances Control; Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Date 6/29/1992 SCOPE * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site. * Identify operable units (OUs) which are appropriate at the Site prior to the implementation of final remedial action(s).

113

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Tritium Tritium Facilities - December 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities - December 2012 December 2012 Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs) at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Savannah River Site's (SRS's) Tritium Facilities (TF). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe NPE.

114

Independent Oversight Review, DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities- April 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities

115

Energy Department Announces $5 Million to Develop Clean Energy Projects at Federal Facilities  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

The Energy Department today announced $5 million in funding for nine projects that will advance the development of combined heat and power (CHP) and renewable energy technologies at facilities across the federal government and help meet energy efficiency, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas reduction goals.

116

Front Matter for The Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

E N E R G Y M A N A G E M E N T P R O G R A M FEDERAL FACILITIES SUSTAINABLE DESIGN The Business Case for IN U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bringing you a prosperous future where energy is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable RESOURCE DOCUMENT The Business Case for SUSTAINABLE DESIGN On the cover: National Institutes of Health, Louis Stokes Laboratories/Building 50, Bethesda, MD Sandia National Laboratories' Process and Environmental Technology Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM Zion National Park Visitors Center, Springdale, UT IN FEDERAL FACILITIES We at the Department of Energy believe there can be a sound business case for the use of sustainable design options, and we encourage all Federal agencies to incorporate these options whenever possible.

117

Front Matter for The Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

E N E R G Y M A N A G E M E N T P R O G R A M FEDERAL FACILITIES SUSTAINABLE DESIGN The Business Case for IN U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bringing you a prosperous future where energy is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable RESOURCE DOCUMENT The Business Case for SUSTAINABLE DESIGN On the cover: National Institutes of Health, Louis Stokes Laboratories/Building 50, Bethesda, MD Sandia National Laboratories' Process and Environmental Technology Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM Zion National Park Visitors Center, Springdale, UT IN FEDERAL FACILITIES We at the Department of Energy believe there can be a sound business case for the use of sustainable design options, and we encourage all Federal agencies to incorporate these options whenever possible.

118

Independent Oversight Review, DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 April 2013 Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities This report provides lessons learned from the 2012 reviews performed by Independent Oversight. The reviews performed during the fall of 2011 and throughout 2012 were at DOE/NNSA sites with hazard category 1 and 2 nuclear facilities, some of which also have significant quantities of hazardous chemicals on site. The purpose of the Independent Oversight review was to determine the state of emergency preparedness of selected sites by examining the sites' processes for evaluating plausible severe NPEs;

119

Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April 2010 Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April 2010 April 2010 Review of Specific Administrative Controls at DOE Nuclear Facilities The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health Safety and Security occasionally reviews specific focus areas. Focus areas are aspects of safety programs that Independent Oversight determines warrant increased management attention based on reviews of performance data, inspection results, and operating experience across DOE sites. Due, in part, to operating experience and previous inspection results. DOE selected specific administrative controls (SACs) as a focus area. SACs are new or revised technical safety requirements (TSRs)

120

Paducah DUF6 Conversion Facility: Record of Decision: As Published in the Federal Register  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

54 54 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Notices accordance with the comprehensive set of DOE requirements and applicable regulatory requirements that have been established to protect public health and the environment. These requirements encompass a wide variety of areas, including radiation protection, facility design criteria, fire protection, emergency preparedness and response, and operational safety requirements. * Cylinder management activities will be conducted in accordance with applicable DOE safety and environmental requirements, including the Cylinder Management Plan. * Temporary impacts on air quality from fugitive dust emissions during reconstruction of cylinder yards or construction of any new facility will be controlled by the best available

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

MONTICELLO NPL SITES Minutes and Action Items of the Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Minutes and Action Items of the Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting Minutes and Action Items of the Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting September 16 and 17,2008 Meeting Location U.S. Department of Energy Site Office, Monticello, Utah Meeting Attendees Jalena Dayvault- U.S. Department of Energy Tim Bartlett- S.M. Stoller Todd Moon- S.M. Stoller Linda Sheader- S. M. Stoller Paul Wetherstein- S.M. Stoller Brent Everett- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Duane Mortensen- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Paul Mushovic- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Rob Stites- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (participated by phone) Christina Wilson- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (participated by phone) Meeting topics and discussion points are summarized under the headings listed below. The agenda and copies of handouts presented during the meeting are attached to this report.

122

Geothermal Heat Pumps Deliver Big Savings for Federal Facilities - Technology Focus  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EE-0291 EE-0291 Internet: www.eere.energy.gov/femp/ No portion of this publication may be altered in any form without prior written consent from the U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, and the authoring national laboratory. Geothermal heat pump surface water loops. Geothermal Heat Pumps Deliver Big Savings for Federal Facilities An update on geothermal heat pump technologies and the Super ESPC Energy-efficiency improvements at federal facilities must enhance support for the agency's critical missions while also saving energy and money. Geothermal heat pumps (GHPs, also known as ground-source heat pumps or GeoExchange systems) can do both, and can help meet energy-conservation, emissions-reduction, and renewable-energy goals. GHP technology is now well known as a proven, reliable, efficient, and

123

The Oak Ridge Reservation PCB Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement, October 28, 1996 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Compliance Agreement Between The United States Compliance Agreement Between The United States Department of Energy and The United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 - Toxic Substances Control Act (Also Known As The Oak Ridge Reservation Polychlorinated Biphenyl Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (ORR-PCB-FFCA)) State Tennessee Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) TSCA Scope Summary Bring DOE's Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) into compliance with TSCA and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR Part 761, "Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce, and Use Prohibitions" Parties DOE; US EPA Date 10/28/1996 SCOPE * Bring DOE's Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) into compliance with TSCA and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR Part 761, "Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

124

Demand Response in the U.S. - Key trends and federal facility participation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

in the U.S. in the U.S. Key trends and federal facility participation Phil Coleman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab FUPWG Williamsburg Meeting November 19, 2008 OUTLINE * Demand response defined * Current status in U.S. * Key trends - Increasing opportunities in "economic" DR - Rise of DR in "capacity" markets - Rise of dynamic pricing - Rise of automated DR ("auto-DR") * Federal participation is small - why? * Ramping up federal participation Demand Response * Def.: A short-term decrease in electrical consumption by end-use customers due to either a) increased electricity prices, or b) incentive payments (triggered by high wholesale market prices or compromised grid reliability). * DR participation can be either through load curtailment (short-term

125

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and Procedures for the Review of Federal and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment October 3, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE, POLICY, AND MANDATES 1. Purpose 2. Statutory Authorities 3. Policy CHAPTER 2 - MANAGEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS 1. General Responsibilities 2. Office of Federal Activities ❍ A. Federal Agency Liaisons ❍ B. Management Information Unit 3. Regional Office 4. Program Offices 5. Specific Review Management Responsibilities ❍ A. Headquarters and Regional Environmental Review Coordinators ❍ B. Principal Reviewer ❍ C. Associate Reviewer ❍ D. Consolidation of Comments 6. Routing and Lead Responsibility of EIS's and Other Federal Actions CHAPTER 3 - PRE-EIS REVIEW ACTIVITIES 1. Policy 2. General Liaison

126

Federal Facilities Compliance Act, Draft Site Treatment Plan: Background Volume, Part 2, Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Draft Site Treatment Plan was prepared by Ames Laboratory to meet the requirements of the Federal Facilities Compliance Act. Topics discussed include: purpose and scope of the plan; site history and mission; draft plant organization; waste minimization; waste characterization; preferred option selection process; technology for treating low-level radioactive wastes and TRU wastes; future generation of mixed waste streams; funding; and process for evaluating disposal issues in support of the site treatment plan.

NONE

1994-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

127

Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Federal Operational Readiness Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Operational Readiness Review June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

128

Buildings Energy Data Book: 4.2 Federal Buildings and Facilities Characteristics  

Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

2 Federal Buildings and Facilities Characteristics 2 Federal Buildings and Facilities Characteristics March 2012 4.2.1 Federal Building Gross Floorspace, by Year and Agency Fiscal Year Agency FY 1985 3.37 DOD 63% FY 1986 3.38 USPS 10% FY 1987 3.40 GSA 6% FY 1988 3.23 VA 5% FY 1989 3.30 DOE 3% FY 1990 3.40 Other 13% FY 1991 3.21 Total 100% FY 1992 3.20 FY 1993 3.20 FY 1994 3.11 FY 1995 3.04 FY 1996 3.03 FY 1997 3.02 FY 1998 3.07 FY 1999 3.07 FY 2000 3.06 FY 2001 3.07 FY 2002 3.03 FY 2003 3.04 FY 2004 2.97 FY 2005 2.96 FY 2006 3.10 FY 2007 3.01 Note(s): Source(s): 2007 Percent of Floorspace (10^9 SF) Total Floorspace The Federal Government owns/operates over 500,000 buildings, including 422,000 housing structures (for the military) and 51,000 nonresidential buildings. DOE/FEMP, Annual Report to Congress on FEMP FY 2007, Jan. 2010, Table 1, p. 13; DOE/FEMP, Annual Report to Congress on FEMP, Nov. 2008, Table

129

Coastal Facilities Review Act (Maryland) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facilities Review Act (Maryland) Facilities Review Act (Maryland) Coastal Facilities Review Act (Maryland) < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Fuel Distributor Industrial Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Municipal/Public Utility Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Systems Integrator Utility Program Info State Maryland Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Maryland Department of the Environment This Act aims to preserve Maryland's coastal areas and to balance competing demands for resources by requiring environmental impact evaluations to be conducted prior to the approval of the construction or operation of certain facilities. Such review complements the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, which establishes a comprehensive plan for the proper use and development of energy resources in coastal areas. This Act applies to

130

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This manual establishes polices and procedures for carrying out the EPA's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

131

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This manual establishes policies and procedures for carrying out the Environmental Protection Agency's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

132

Restructuring, Tight Budgets and Executive Order 13123 Create New Incentives to Reduce Waste in Federal Industrial Facilities  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This paper discusses the positive impact that electric utility industry restructuring, a reduction in the size of government operations, and the recent Presidential Executive Order 13123 should have on energy use in Federal industrial facilities...

Verdict, M. E.

133

Facility Representative Program: Criteria Review and Approach Document  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Assessment Tools Assessment Tools Surveillance Guides Manager's Guide for Safety and Health Walkthroughs Criteria Review and Approach Document This page provides Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADS) to assist Facility Representatives. Please submit your CRADS for posting by sending them to the HQ FR Program Manager. Please include the subject, date, and a contact person. Communications NASA Benchmarks Communications Assessment Plan Configuration Management Configuration Management Assessment Plan Confined Space Confined Spaces Assessment Plan Conduct of Operations Conduct of Operations Assessment Plan Electrical Assessment Electrical Safety Assessment Plan Facility Procedures Verification and Validation of Facility Procedures Assessment Plan Hoisting and Rigging

134

Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan (SRP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Standard Review Plan (SRP), Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities, was developed by the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS)1, Office of the Under Secretary for Nuclear Security, to help strengthen the technical rigor of line management oversight and federal monitoring of DOE nuclear facilities. This SRP (hereafter refers to as the Engineering SRP) provides consistent review guidance to assure that engineering and technical requirements are appropriately applied for the design, operations and disposition2 of DOE nuclear facilities. It is one of a series of three SRPs developed by the CNS. The other two SRPs address: 1) nuclear safety basis program review; and 2) application of requirements of DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, and DOE-STD-1189, Integration of Safety into the Design Process, for DOE Critical Decision (CD) review and approval. These SRPs may be revised in the future to reflect changes in the DOE requirements, lessons learned, and experience/insights from nuclear facility design, operations, and disposition.

135

California Federal Facilities: Rate-Responsive Buidling Operating for Deeper Cost and Energy Savings  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rouggly, energy manager at SSA's Frank Hagel Federal Building in Richmond Rouggly, energy manager at SSA's Frank Hagel Federal Building in Richmond California, reports that the facility garnered $35,000 in credits in 2011 on PG&E's Peak Day Pricing (PDP) tariff. "Frankly I was stunned! It's getting a lot of positive attention with our management," said Rouggly. "We were able to drop 400 kW by pre-cooling the building and shutting down one chiller during peak events. We also turned off 2 of our 8 elevators and reduced lighting in corridors to emergency levels. We got about $100 per day just for being on the program, but the big credits we earned were for trimming demand and reducing kWh during peak events." Rouggly plans to increase curtailment efforts further this summer. Dynamic pricing electricity tariffs,

136

U.S. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement for the Hanford Site, February 7, 1994 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for Radionuclide for Radionuclide NESHAP State Washington Agreement Type Federal Facility Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) CAA Scope Summary Bring DOE's Hanford site into compliance with CAA Parties EPA; DOE; Richland Operations Office (RL) Date 02/07/1994 SCOPE * Bring DOE's Hanford site into compliance with CAA. This Compliance Plan contains a schedule for DOE to evaluate the monitoring systems associated with Designated Stacks to ensure that these systems conform to the standards for continuous monitoring systems in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 61, Subpart H. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Beginning 30 days after the effective date of this Agreement, DOE shall submit quarterly progress reports to EPA until the requirements contained in Amendment A

137

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility- August 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Safety Basis and Design Development.

138

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility- April 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Construction Quality and Fire Protection Systems

139

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) |  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) On October 23, 2009, the Department of Energy and eight other Federal agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to improve coordination among project applicants, federal agencies, states and tribes involved in the siting and permitting process for electric transmission facilities on Federal land. The MOU will improve uniformity, consistency, and transparency by describing each entity's role and responsibilities when project applicants wish to build electric transmission facilities. Additionally, the MOU designates a "Lead Agency" serving as the single point-of-contact for coordinating all federal environmental reviews

140

Ground-Source Heat Pumps Applied to Federal Facilities, Second Edition  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and exterior to the facility, are typically less and exterior to the facility, are typically less than those for conventional systems. Potential Application The technology has been shown to be techni- cally valid and economically attractive in many applications. It is efficient and effective. This Federal Technology Alert reports on the collec- tive experience of heat pump users and evalua- tors and provides application guidance. An estimated 400,000 ground-source heat pumps are operating in the private and public sector, although most of these systems operate in resi- dential applications. A ground-source heat pump system can be applied in virtually any category of climate or building. The large num- ber of installations testifies to the stability of this technology. The reported problems can usually be attributed to faulty design or

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW November 22, 2006 Conducted by: Harry Harmon, Team Lead Civil/Structural Sub Team Facility Safety Sub Team Engineering Sub Team Peter Lowry, Lead James Langsted, Lead George Krauter, Lead Robert Kennedy Chuck Negin Art Etchells Les Youd Jerry Evatt Oliver Block Loring Wyllie Richard Stark Tim Adams Tom Anderson Todd LaPointe Stephen Gosselin Carl Costantino Norman Moreau Patrick Corcoran John Christian Ken Cooper Kari McDaniel _____________________________ Harry D. Harmon ITR Team Leader SPD-SWPF-217 SPD-SWPF-217: Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review 11/22/2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The ITR Team wishes to thank Shari Clifford of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for

142

Review of the Headquarters Facilities Emergency Response Plans  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 2002 March 2002 Review of the Headquarters Facilities Emergency Response Plans OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1 2.0 OVERVIEW OF RESULTS ........................................................ 3 3.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS ...................................................... 5 3.1 Emergency Response Programs, Plans, and Procedures ....... 5 3.2 Emergency Management Requirements, Roles, and Responsibilities ............................................................... 8 3.3 Emergency Facilities and Equipment ................................... 10 4.0 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................... 12 5.0 OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENTS .............................

143

Operational Readiness Review: Savannah River Replacement Tritium Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Operational Readiness Review (ORR) is one of several activities to be completed prior to introducing tritium into the Replacement Tritium Facility (RTF) at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The Secretary of Energy will rely in part on the results of this ORR in deciding whether the startup criteria for RTF have been met. The RTF is a new underground facility built to safely service the remaining nuclear weapons stockpile. At RTF, tritium will be unloaded from old components, purified and enriched, and loaded into new or reclaimed reservoirs. The RTF will replace an aging facility at SRS that has processed tritium for more than 35 years. RTF has completed construction and is undergoing facility startup testing. The final stages of this testing will require the introduction of limited amounts of tritium. The US Department of Energy (DOE) ORR was conducted January 19 to February 4, 1993, in accordance with an ORR review plan which was developed considering previous readiness reviews. The plan also considered the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Recommendations 90-4 and 92-6, and the judgements of experienced senior experts. The review covered three major areas: (1) Plant and Equipment Readiness, (2) Personnel Readiness, and (3) Management Systems. The ORR Team was comprised of approximately 30 members consisting of a Team Leader, Senior Safety Experts, and Technical Experts. The ORR objectives and criteria were based on DOE Orders, industry standards, Institute of Nuclear Power Operations guidelines, recommendations of external oversight groups, and experience of the team members.

Not Available

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

Buildings Energy Data Book: 4.3 Federal Buildings and Facilities Expenditures  

Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

2 2 Annual Energy Expenditures per Gross Square Foot of Federal Floorspace Stock, by Year ($2010) FY 1985 2.13 FY 2000 1.36 FY 2001 1.58 FY 2002 1.49 FY 2003 1.45 FY 2004 1.54 FY 2005 1.59 FY 2006 2.01 (1) FY 2007 2.01 Note(s): Source(s): Total Federal buildings and facilities energy expenditures in FY 2006 were $5.79 billion (in $2010). 1) Increase due to change in FEMP categorization of Federal buildings. DOE/FEMP, Annual Report to Congress on FEMP FY 2007, Jan. 2010, Table A-9, p. 97 and Table 1, p. 13; DOE/FEMP, Annual Report to Congress on FEMP, Nov. 2008, Table A-9, p. 78 for energy costs, and Table 1, p. 12 for floorspace for 2006; DOE/FEMP, Annual Report to Congress on FEMP, Sep. 2006, Table A-12, p. 158 for energy costs for 1985-2005; DOE/FEMP, Annual Report on FEMP, Dec. 2002, Table 8-A, p. 61 for 2000; DOE/FEMP, Annual

145

Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, Solar Screening Evaluation Checklist, September 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This guide presents an overview of the process for successfully planning for and installing solar technology on a federal site. It is specifically targeted to managers of federal buildings and sites, contracting officers, energy and sustainability officers, and regional procurement managers. The solar project process is outlined in a concise, easy-to-understand, step-by-step format. Information includes a brief overview of legislation and executive orders related to renewable energy and the compelling reasons for implementing a solar project on a federal site. It also includes how to assess a facility to identify the best solar installation site, project recommendations and considerations to help avoid unforeseen issues, and guidance on financing and contracting options. Case studies with descriptions of successful solar deployments across multiple agencies are presented. In addition, detailed information and sample documents for specific tasks are referenced with Web links or included in the appendixes. The guide concentrates on distributed solar generation and not large, centralized solar energy generation.

146

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review for State and Federal Agencies  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Scientific Peer Review Capabilities Overview Peer review planning Expert identification Peer review management Workshop coordination Process improvement How ORISE is making a...

147

Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC Projects  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports For Federal ESPC Projects February 2007 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy This document was developed for the U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program by Nexant, Inc., and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. This document is posted on FEMP's Web site at www.eere.energy.gov/femp/financing/superespcs_mvresources.html. Contents Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC Projects 1 Step 1 - Prepare Custom Report and Checklists from Template 1 Step 2 - Review Project Documentation 2 Step 3 - Complete Checklists 2 Step 4 - Finalize Report 3 Step 5 - Provide Written Review to Agency and DOE 3

148

Review of the Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities Implementation Verification Review Processes  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities Implementation Verification Review Processes June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 1

149

Review of the Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities Implementation Verification Review Processes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities Implementation Verification Review Processes June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 1

150

Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers OCTOBER 2011 Fuel Cell Technologies Program Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2 October 2011 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily

151

Monticello NPL Sites Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting Minutes & Action Items  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

NPL Sites NPL Sites Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting Minutes & Action Items Location Monticello, Utah- DOE Office of Legacy Management field office Date September 27,2006 Attendees David Bird- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Paul Mushovic- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Att Kleinrath- U.S. Depmtment of Energy Tim Bartlett- S. M. Stoller Meeting topics and discussion points are summarized separately under the headings that follow. Attaclunent 1 to this report includes the agenda and handout materials provided at the meeting. This report also includes disposal cell and Pond 4 leachate collection data (Attachment 2), quarterly site inspection results (Attachment 3), and project schedule and deliverables through the next two qumters (October 2006 through March 2007). With this

152

Ground-Source Heat Pumps Applied to Federal Facilities, Second Edition  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

E E N E R G Y M A N A G E M E N T P R O G R A M and exterior to the facility, are typically less than those for conventional systems. Potential Application The technology has been shown to be techni- cally valid and economically attractive in many applications. It is efficient and effective. This Federal Technology Alert reports on the collec- tive experience of heat pump users and evalua- tors and provides application guidance. An estimated 400,000 ground-source heat pumps are operating in the private and public sector, although most of these systems operate in resi- dential applications. A ground-source heat pump system can be applied in virtually any category of climate or building. The large num- ber of installations testifies to the stability of this technology. The reported problems can

153

Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

on Storage of on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 State Washington Agreement Type Federal Facility Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) TSCA Scope Summary Address DOE and the NNPP's inability to comply at this time with the regulations in 40 Parties DOE; US EPA; US Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) Date 8/8/1996 SCOPE * Address DOE and the NNPP's inability to comply at this time with the regulations in 40 CFR 761.65(a), which require polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) stored for disposal to be removed from storage and disposed of within one year of being placed in storage, and the Department of Transportation (DOT) container specifications in 40 CFR 761.65(c)(6). ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Annually, starting six months after the effective date of this Agreement, DOE and the

154

Guidance for federal facilities on release notification requirements under CERCLA and SARA Title 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA or Superfund''), as amended, creates a framework for Federal involvement in response to and cleanup of hazardous substance releases. Although many of its provisions deal with cleanup, liability, and compensation associated with inactive or abandoned hazardous waste sites, equally important parts of CERCLA address the reporting of and response to releases of hazardous substances as they occur. The statute establishes a list of hazardous substances,'' of which there are currently 727. The CERCLA list contains hazardous substances identified under other statutes, including the Clean Water Act (CWS), the Clean Air Act (CAA), and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). CERCLA also contains a provision authorizing the Administrator of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to add substances to the list that when released into the environment may present substantial danger to the public health or welfare or the environment...'' EPA is providing this guidance document so that Federal facilities may better understand the CERCLA and SARA Title 3 release notification requirements. The information is presented in a variety of formats, including questions and answers, fact sheets, scenarios, and a flowchart. A glossary of key terms also has been included in this document. 5 figs.

Not Available

1990-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Savannah River Site- Salt Waste Processing Facility: Briefing on the Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This is a presentation outlining the Salt Waste Processing Facility process, major risks, approach for conducting reviews, discussion of the findings, and conclusions.

156

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for conducting various types of security reviews and assessments and correcting findings.

157

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility- August 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility Found Fuel Multi-Canister Overpack Operations

158

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility- January 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Fire Suppression Vital Safety System

159

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy-Efficient Product Procurement (EEPP) Portfolio Meeting: Washington D.C., Dec. 4, 2012 Reviewers: David Goldstein (Chair), Harvey Sachs, Cyndi Vallina, Marina Moses, and Shahzeen Attari Review: Jan. 25, 2013 Summary The Review Committee met in Washington, D.C., and engaged in a day-long discussion with FEMP EEPP staff and contractors. Program staff gave clear and effective presentations, and we had extensive and illuminating discussions with the staff, and to a limited extent with other interested parties who attended. The Committee worked together after the meeting and by email to produce this review. Our review addresses: * strategic issues with respect to the program,

160

Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC Projects  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The purpose of this document is to provide a framework for implementing uniform and consistent reviews of post-installation and annual reports for federal ESPC projects. These procedures will allow for consistent evaluations of performance reports, produce standardized reviews, and enable centralized tracking of ongoing project performance.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Governor's Office of Planning and Research, issued on March 5, 2013, a draft handbook on integrating NEPA and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review processes....

162

CRAD, Facility Safety- Nuclear Facility Safety Basis  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) that can be used for assessment of a contractor's Nuclear Facility Safety Basis.

163

Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Sustainable Sustainable Federal Fleets to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Data Center Energy Efficiency Industrial Facilities Sustainable Federal Fleets Laboratories for the 21st Century Institutional Change

164

Buildings Energy Data Book: 4.3 Federal Buildings and Facilities Expenditures  

Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

3 3 Direct Appropriations on Federal Buildings Energy Conservation Retrofits and Capital Equipment ($2010 Million) FY 1985 FY 1986 FY 1987 FY 1988 FY 1989 FY 1990 Source(s): DOE/FEMP, Annual Report to Congress on FEMP FY 2007, Jan. 2010, Table 11-B, p. 31; DOE/FEMP, Annual Report to Congress on FEMP, Nov. 2007, Table 9-B, p. 26 for 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000-2006; DOE/FEMP, Annual Report to Congress on FEMP, Sep. 2004, Table 4-B, p. 38 for 1986-1989, 1991-1994, 1996-1999; EIA, Annual Energy Review 2010, Oct. 2011, Appendix D, p. 353 for price deflators. 349,350 102,135 FY 1996 238,232 FY 2002 147,895 83,340 FY 1995 438,943 FY 2001 162,488 FY 2007 321,686 108,705 FY 1994 318,739 FY 2000 150,900 FY 2006 301,222 98,708 FY 1993 170,826 FY 1999 261,784 FY 2005 201,156 342,653 FY 1992 209,973

165

Buildings Energy Data Book: 4.4 Legislation Affecting Energy Consumption of Federal Buildings and Facilities  

Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

3 3 Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, Provisions Affecting Energy Consumption in Federal Buildings Source(s): Standard Relating to Solar Hot Water - Requires new Federal buildings, or Federal buildings undergoing major renovations, to meet at least 30 percent of hot water demand through the use of solar hot water heaters, if cost-effective. [Section 523] Federally-Procured Appliances with Standby Power - Requires all Federal agencies to procure appliances with standby power consumption of less than 1 watt, if available and cost-effective. [Section 524] Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, enacted December 19, 2007 Energy Reduction Goals for Federal Buildings - Amended reduction goals set by the National Energy Conservation Policy Act, and

166

Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities (Book)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To accomplish Federal goals for renewable energy, sustainability, and energy security, large-scale renewable energy projects must be developed and constructed on Federal sites at a significant scale with significant private investment. The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) helps Federal agencies meet these goals and assists agency personnel navigate the complexities of developing such projects and attract the necessary private capital to complete them. This guide is intended to provide a general resource that will begin to develop the Federal employee's awareness and understanding of the project developer's operating environment and the private sector's awareness and understanding of the Federal environment. Because the vast majority of the investment that is required to meet the goals for large-scale renewable energy projects will come from the private sector, this guide has been organized to match Federal processes with typical phases of commercial project development. The main purpose of this guide is to provide a project development framework to allow the Federal Government, private developers, and investors to work in a coordinated fashion on large-scale renewable energy projects. The framework includes key elements that describe a successful, financially attractive large-scale renewable energy project.

Not Available

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

Notice of Intent to Revise DOE G 226.1-2, Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This revision will incorporate new content devoted to Federal oversight and evaluation of effectiveness of activity-level work planning and control (WP&C) at Hazard Category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities.

2013-04-04T23:59:59.000Z

168

Buildings Energy Data Book: 4.4 Legislation Affecting Energy Consumption of Federal Buildings and Facilities  

Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

1 1 Energy Policy Act of 2005, Provisions Affecting Energy Consumption in Federal Buildings Source(s): Energy Management Requirements - Amended reduction goals set by the National Energy Conservation Policy Act, and requires increasing percentage reductions in energy consumption through FY 2015, with a final energy consumption reduction goal of 20 percent savings in FY 2015, as compared to the baseline energy consumption of Federal buildings in FY 2003. (These goals were superseded by Section 431 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.) [Section 102] Energy Use Measurement and Accountability - Requires that all Federal buildings be metered to measure electricity use by 2012. [Section 103] Procurement of Energy Efficient Products - Requires all Federal agencies to procure ENERGY STAR qualified products, for product

169

Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities (Book), Large-Scale Renewable Energy Guide, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities A Practical Guide to Getting Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects Financed with Private Capital Cover photos, clockwise from the top: Installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors - (January 19, 2012) Crews work around the clock installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors, built on site, that will cover 3 square miles at Abengoa's Solana Plant. Solana a 280 megawatt utility scale solar power plant (CSP) under construction in Gila Bend, Arizona, USA. When finished it will generate 280 MW 's of clean, sustainable power serving over 70,000 Arizona homes. Photo by Dennis Schroeder, NREL 20097 Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona; Suzlon S88 wind turbines - The 63-MW Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona is the first

170

Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities (Book), Large-Scale Renewable Energy Guide, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities A Practical Guide to Getting Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects Financed with Private Capital Cover photos, clockwise from the top: Installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors - (January 19, 2012) Crews work around the clock installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors, built on site, that will cover 3 square miles at Abengoa's Solana Plant. Solana a 280 megawatt utility scale solar power plant (CSP) under construction in Gila Bend, Arizona, USA. When finished it will generate 280 MW 's of clean, sustainable power serving over 70,000 Arizona homes. Photo by Dennis Schroeder, NREL 20097 Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona; Suzlon S88 wind turbines - The 63-MW Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona is the first

171

Oak Ridge reservation federal facility agreement for the Environmental Restoration Program. Volume 1. Quarterly report, October--December 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This quarterly progress report satisfies requirements for the Environmental Restoration (ER) Program that are specified in the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) established between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC). The reporting period covered is October through December 1993 (first quarter of FY 1994). Sections 1.1 and 1.2 provide respectively the milestones scheduled for completion during the reporting period and a list of documents that have been proposed for transmittal during the following quarter but have not been approved as FY 1994 commitments.

Not Available

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

172

Oak Ridge Reservation Federal Facility Agreement for the Environmental Restoration Program. Volume 4. Quarterly report, July--September 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This quarterly progress report satisfies requirements for the Environmental Restoration (ER) Program that are specified in the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) established between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Environmental protection Agency (EPA), and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC). The reporting period covered is July through September 1993 (fourth quarter of FY 1993). Sections 1.1 and 1.2 provide respectively the milestones scheduled for completion during the reporting period and a list of documents that have been proposed for transmittal during the following quarter but have not been approved as FY 1994 commitments.

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order quarterly progress report for the period ending June 30, 1991  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is the ninth quarterly report as required by the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Ecology et al. 1990), also known as the Tri-Party Agreement, established between the US Department of Energy (DOE), the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). The Tri-Party Agreement sets the plan and schedule for achieving regulatory compliance and cleanup of waste sites at the Hanford Site. This report covers progress for the quarter that ended June 30, 1991. A total of 87 milestones have been completed to date. 39 refs., 1 fig.

Not Available

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

I have reviewed your Request for Information published in the Federal Register o  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

have reviewed your Request for Information published in the Federal Register on February 27, 2012. I have reviewed your Request for Information published in the Federal Register on February 27, 2012. I would suggest that these are very difficult questions to answer and really vary by the developer, the region and the type of project. There are no canned answers that would fit for responses to the questions raised. I would suggest that a joint workshop be set up with a cross section of industry representatives to meet with members of the Rapid Response Team and explore these questions and the range of answers together. I think it is more important that the RRT understand what developers must go through for generation and transmission projects. It is clear that RRT does understand the variation in schedules between transmission and certain forms of generation. This schedule difference

175

Independent Oversight Review of the Idaho National Laboratory Fuel Conditioning Facility Safety Basis  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF THE IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY FUEL CONDITIONING FACILITY SAFETY BASIS April 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Independent Oversight i INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF THE IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY FUEL CONDITIONING FACILITY SAFETY BASIS Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ ii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................1

176

Buildings Energy Data Book: 4.3 Federal Buildings and Facilities...  

Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

1 FY 2007 Federal Buildings Energy Prices and Expenditures, by Fuel Type (2010) Fuel Type Electricity 23.68 (1) 4,009 Natural Gas 9.37 1,138 Fuel Oil 15.25 419 Coal 3.62 63...

177

Combined Heat and Power for Federal Facilities and the DOE CHP...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

technical assistance to end-users and stakeholders to help them consider CHP, waste heat to power, andor district energy with CHP in their facility and to help them through...

178

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds This Environmental Protection Agency report contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including those to increase environmental and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded projects. Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds More Documents & Publications Pollution Prevention - Environmental Impact Reduction Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers Memorandum to Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies Regarding Pollution Prevention and the National Environmental Policy Act EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact

179

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds This Environmental Protection Agency report contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including those to increase environmental and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded projects. Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds More Documents & Publications Pollution Prevention - Environmental Impact Reduction Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers Memorandum to Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies Regarding Pollution Prevention and the National Environmental Policy Act Executive Order 13148-Greening the Government Through Leadership in

180

Analysis of Federal and State Policies and Environmental Issues for Bioethanol Production Facilities  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

However, while the United States remains the world leader in ethanol production from corn, a first-generation feedstock, projected increases in production of ethanol from second-generation feedstocks have not yet been realized, even with considerable policy and economic incentives. ... Additionally, a chronicle of ethanol production activities in the four states, both proposed projects and operational facilities, is assembled. ... All of the companies in Iowa use corn as feedstock, with one facility (POETs Project Liberty) also producing cellulosic ethanol using corn stover as feedstock at a pilot plant and is scheduled to scale up to commercial scale in 2012. ...

Chandra McGee; Amy B. Chan Hilton

2011-01-12T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Office of Enterprise Assessments Review of the Fire Protection...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

CDNS NNSA Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety CFR Code of Federal Regulations CMR Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility CRAD Criteria, Review, and Approach Document CRD...

182

Oak Ridge Reservation Federal Facility agreement quarterly report for the Environmental Restoration Program, January--March 1994. Volume 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This quarterly progress report satisfies requirements for the Environmental Restoration (ER) Program that are specified in the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) established between the US Department of Energy (DOE), the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC). The reporting period covered herein is January through March 1994 (second quarter of FY 1994). Sections 1.1 and 1.2 provide respectively the milestones scheduled for completion during the reporting period and a list of documents that have been proposed for transmittal during the following quarter but have not been approved as FY 1994 commitments. Section 2 covers significant accomplishments. Section 3 discusses technical status at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge K-25 Site, and Clinch River. Technical oversight and technical programs are also covered. Section 4 covers responds action contractor assignments.

Not Available

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

Oak Ridge Reservation Federal Facility Agreement quarterly report for the environmental restoration program. Volume 3: April--June 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This quarterly progress report satisfies requirements for the Environmental Restoration (ER) Program that are specified in the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) established between the US Department of Energy (DOE), the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC). Sections 1.1 and 1.2 provide respectively the milestones scheduled for completion during the reporting period and a list of documents that have been proposed for transmittal during the following quarter but have not been approved as FY 1995 commitments. The report describes the technical status of the following: Y-12 Plant; Oak Ridge National Lab; K-25 Plant; and Oak Ridge Reservation boundary areas. The report also describes technical programs, namely: the Oak Ridge environmental information system, remote sensing and special survey program, and the risk assessment program.

NONE

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

Oak Ridge Reservation Federal Facility Agreement quarterly report for the environmental restoration program. Volume 2: January--March 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This quarterly progress report satisfies requirements for the Environmental Restoration (ER) Program that are specified in the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) established between the US Department of Energy (DOE), the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC). Sections 1.1 and 1.2 provide respectively the milestones scheduled for completion during the reporting period and a list of documents that have been proposed for transmittal during the following quarter but have not been approved as FY 1995 commitments. The report describes the technical status of the following: Y-12 Plant; Oak Ridge National Lab; K-25 Plant; and Oak Ridge Reservation boundary areas. The report also describes technical programs, namely: the Oak Ridge environmental information system, remote sensing and special survey program, and the risk assessment program.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

185

Independent Oversight Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities, May 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................ii Executive Summaiy .....................................................................................................................................iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1

186

Independent Oversight Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities, May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................ii Executive Summaiy .....................................................................................................................................iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1

187

Memorandum of Understanding on early coordination of federal authorizations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

on early coordination of federal on early coordination of federal authorizations and related environmental reviews required in order to site electric transmission facilities: August 2006 Memorandum of Understanding on early coordination of federal authorizations and related environmental reviews required in order to site electric transmission facilities: August 2006 With the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), the Department of Energy (DOE), the Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Department of Defense (DOD), the Department of the Interior POI), the Department of Commerce (DOC), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP)

188

The Mixed Waste Management Facility. Preliminary design review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document presents information about the Mixed Waste Management Facility. Topics discussed include: cost and schedule baseline for the completion of the project; evaluation of alternative options; transportation of radioactive wastes to the facility; capital risk associated with incineration; radioactive waste processing; scaling of the pilot-scale system; waste streams to be processed; molten salt oxidation; feed preparation; initial operation to demonstrate selected technologies; floorplans; baseline revisions; preliminary design baseline; cost reduction; and project mission and milestones.

NONE

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

189

Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Facility: Record of Decision: As Published in the Federal Register  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

49 49 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Notices halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make recommendations to DOE in the areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities. Tentative Agenda 8 a.m.-Introductions, overview of meeting agenda and logistics (Dave Mosby) 8:15 a.m.-Past year evaluation-Board and stakeholder survey results, what worked, what can be improved (Facilitator) 9:50 a.m.-Break 10:05 a.m.-Past year evaluation continued 10:45 a.m.-Summaries and Q&A on the most important issues to DOE, TN Department of Environment & Conservation, and EPA (Facilitator) 11:30 a.m.-Lunch

190

AVTA Federal Fleet PEV Readiness Data Logging and Characterization Study for NASA White Sands Test Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report focuses on the NASA White Sands Test Facility (WSTF) fleet to identify daily operational characteristics of select vehicles and report findings on vehicle and mission characterizations to support the successful introduction of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) into the agencies fleets. Individual observations of these selected vehicles provide the basis for recommendations related to electric vehicle adoption and whether a battery electric vehicle (BEV) or plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) (collectively plug-in electric vehicles, or PEVs) can fulfill the mission requirements.

Stephen Schey; Jim Francfort

2014-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

191

A Review of the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Readiness  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » A Review of the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Readiness Preparation Proposals Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary Name: A Review of the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Readiness Preparation Proposals Agency/Company /Organization: World Resources Institute Sector: Land Focus Area: Forestry Topics: Implementation, Policies/deployment programs Resource Type: Lessons learned/best practices Website: pdf.wri.org/working_papers/getting_ready_2010-07-13.pdf A Review of the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Readiness Preparation Proposals Screenshot References: A Review of R-PP[1] This working paper is part of a series of regular updates reviewing the Readiness Preparation Proposals (R-PPs) submitted by REDD+ Country

192

Facility Representative Program Assessment Criteria, Review, and Approach Document (CRAD)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

STD-1063-2011 STD-1063-2011 Appendix B B-1 FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT GUIDE The DOE has implemented its FR Program, and is looking to continuously improve the program's effectiveness DOE-wide. An effective FR Program has many elements, as described in this Standard. These elements are intended to yield a program that provides DOE facilities with well-trained FRs who spend appropriate amounts of time in their facilities and can work effectively with their contractor management counterparts. The program, to be effective, needs the functional support of management. To maintain the continued support of DOE management, the FR program needs to demonstrate its continued performance and effectiveness, which is to be assessed periodically using

193

Standard Review Plan Preparation for Facility Operations Strengthening...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Planning and Conducting Readiness Reviews DOE O 422.1, Admin Chg 1, Conduct of Operations, June 2013 DOE O 426.2, Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and...

194

Review of the Headquarters Facilities Emergency Response Plans  

Energy Savers [EERE]

this review have comprehensive fire alarm systems that are automatically activated by heat, smoke, or fire suppression system activity or by manual pull stations. Manual pull...

195

Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility: Briefing on the Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review Harry Harmon January 9, 2007 2 U.S. Department of Energy Outline * SWPF Process Overview * Major Risks * Approach for Conducting Review * Discussion of Findings * Conclusions 3 U.S. Department of Energy Salt Waste Processing Facility 4 U.S. Department of Energy SWPF Process Overview Alpha Finishing Process CSSX Alpha Strike Process MST/ Sludge Cs Strip Effluent DSS 5 U.S. Department of Energy BOTTOM LINE The SWPF Project is ready to move into final design. 6 U.S. Department of Energy Major Risks * Final geotechnical data potentially could result in redesign of the PC-3 CPA base mat and structure. * Cost and schedule impacts arising from the change from ISO-9001 to NQA-1 quality assurance requirements. * The "de-inventory, flush, and then hands-on

196

CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) that can be used for assessment of a contractor's Nuclear Facility Safety Basis. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis More Documents & Publications CRAD, Facility Safety - Unreviewed Safety Question Requirements Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 FAQS Job Task Analyses - Nuclear Safety Specialist

197

Federal Energy Management Program: Business Case for Sustainable Design in  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Business Case for Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities on

198

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Carbon Fiber Technology Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation given by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about the carbon...

199

Independent Oversight Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant, December 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Targeted Review of the Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant December 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 2

200

GAO-11-520T Federal Real Property: Progress Made on Planning and Data, but Unneeded Owned and Leased Facilities Remain  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Economic Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives FEDERAL REAL PROPERTY Progress Made on Planning and Data, but Unneeded Owned and Leased Facilities Remain Statement of David J. Wise, Director Physical Infrastructure Issues Brian J. Lepore, Director Defense Capabilities and Management Issues For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. EDT Wednesday, April 6, 2011 GAO-11-520T Accountability * Integrity * Reliability Highlights of GAO-11-520T, a testimony before the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives. April 6, 2011 FEDERAL REAL PROPERTY

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Federal Energy Management Success Stories  

Energy Savers [EERE]

6 Federal Energy Management Success Stories en FEMP Helps Federal Facilities Develop Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects http:energy.goveeresuccess-storiesarticles...

202

Review of the Physical Science Facility Stack Air Sampling Probe Locations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This letter report reviews compliance of the current design of the Physical Science Facility (PSF) stack air sampling locations with the ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999 standard. The review was based on performance criteria used for locating air sampling probes, the design documents provided and available information on systems previously tested for compliance with the criteria. Recommendations are presented for ways to bring the design into compliance with the requirements for the sampling probe placement.

Glissmeyer, John A.

2007-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

203

Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facilities Facilities Facilities LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. Contact Operator Los Alamos National Laboratory (505) 667-5061 Some LANL facilities are available to researchers at other laboratories, universities, and industry. Unique facilities foster experimental science, support LANL's security mission DARHT accelerator DARHT's electron accelerators use large, circular aluminum structures to create magnetic fields that focus and steer a stream of electrons down the length of the accelerator. Tremendous electrical energy is added along the way. When the stream of high-speed electrons exits the accelerator it is

204

Benefits of Smart Grid Technologies for the Federal Sector  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Benefits of Smart Grid Technologies Benefits of Smart Grid Technologies for the Federal Sector Steve Bossart Senior Energy Analyst U.S. DOE NETL IATF Technology Deployment Working Group March 15, 2012 Topics * Background of Federal Smart Grid Task Force * Microgrids and Smart Grid * Task Review of Federal authorizations, financial tools, and building codes relative to their impact on using smart grid to assist in meeting Federal facility energy goals * Case studies from Federal agencies ‹#› Federal Smart Grid Task Force ‹#› Federal Smart Grid Task Force Created Under EISA Title XIII, Section 1303 To ensure awareness, coordination, and integration of the diverse smart grid activities in the Federal Government Functions �Serves as Federal focal point on all things "smart grid"

205

Benefits of Smart Grid Technologies for the Federal Sector  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Benefits of Smart Grid Technologies Benefits of Smart Grid Technologies for the Federal Sector Steve Bossart Senior Energy Analyst U.S. DOE NETL IATF Technology Deployment Working Group March 15, 2012 Topics * Background of Federal Smart Grid Task Force * Microgrids and Smart Grid * Task Review of Federal authorizations, financial tools, and building codes relative to their impact on using smart grid to assist in meeting Federal facility energy goals * Case studies from Federal agencies ‹#› Federal Smart Grid Task Force ‹#› Federal Smart Grid Task Force Created Under EISA Title XIII, Section 1303 To ensure awareness, coordination, and integration of the diverse smart grid activities in the Federal Government Functions �Serves as Federal focal point on all things "smart grid"

206

SUMMARY OF REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING FEDERAL POWER ACT SECTION 216 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SUMMARY OF REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING FEDERAL POWER ACT SECTION 216 SUMMARY OF REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING FEDERAL POWER ACT SECTION 216 SUMMARY OF REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING FEDERAL POWER ACT SECTION 216 The Energy Policy Act of 2005 added section 216(h) to the Federal Power Act providing for the Department of Energy to act as the lead agency for coordinating all applicable Federal authorizations and related environmental reviews required under Federal law in order to site an electric transmission facility. The Act authorized DOE to issue any regulations necessary to implement the provisions of 216(h). SUMMARY OF REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING FEDERAL POWER ACT SECTION 216 More Documents & Publications SUMMARY OF REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING FEDERAL POWER ACT SECTION 216 Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal

207

Commissioning for Federal Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Introduction Introduction Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Introduction Introduction B uilding commissioning has often been likened to commissioning of a ship, where the Owners thor- oughly verify and prove the func- tional performance of all parts - engines, compasses, sonar, radar, radio, generators, potable water systems, and so on - under all pos- sible conditions and as a condition of acceptance before placing the ship in service. And where the Owner checks the presence of sys- tem operating and procedures manuals and the availability of up- to-date navigation charts. And where the crew has been properly and thoroughly trained on the ship's systems' operations and emergency procedures. Commissioning is not new - ships and aircraft have been commissioned for years. Building commissioning has

208

Commissioning for Federal Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Introduction Introduction Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Introduction Introduction B uilding commissioning has often been likened to commissioning of a ship, where the Owners thor- oughly verify and prove the func- tional performance of all parts - engines, compasses, sonar, radar, radio, generators, potable water systems, and so on - under all pos- sible conditions and as a condition of acceptance before placing the ship in service. And where the Owner checks the presence of sys- tem operating and procedures manuals and the availability of up- to-date navigation charts. And where the crew has been properly and thoroughly trained on the ship's systems' operations and emergency procedures. Commissioning is not new - ships and aircraft have been commissioned for years. Building commissioning has

209

Review of the Implementation Verification Rev iew Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities, September 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Implementation Verification Review Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities May 2011 September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1

210

Review of the Implementation Verification Rev iew Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities, September 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Implementation Verification Review Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities May 2011 September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1

211

Status Review of Wildlife Mitigation, Columbia Basin Hydroelectric Projects, Columbia River Mainstem Facilities, 1984 Final Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report reviews the status of past, present, and proposed future wildlife planning and mitigation programs at existing hydroelectric projects in the Columbia River Basin. The project evaluations will form the basis for determining any needed remedial measures or additional project analysis. Each hydropower facility report is abstracted separately for inclusion in the Energy Data Base.

Howerton, Jack; Hwang, Diana

1984-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

212

Order Module--DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS AND SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS Order Module--DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS AND SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS The familiar level of this module is divided into two sections that are intended to provide only an overview of the material contained in DOE-STD-1104-2009, which should be consulted for complete information. The first section covers the introduction, applicability, and chapters 1 and 2. The second section covers chapters 3, 4, and 5. We have provided examples throughout the module to help familiarize you with the material. The examples will also help prepare you for the practice at the end of this module and for the criterion test.

213

Flooding of an underground facility at Yucca Mountain: A summary of NRC review plans  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) are developing review plans for a potential high-level waste (HLW) repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. This early preparation of NRC`s review program will ensure that important technical issues related to compliance with 10 CFR Part 60 will be identified before receipt of a license application. Under the siting criteria of NRC`s Part 60, one of the potentially adverse conditions is the potential for flooding of the underground facility by surface waters. The Department of Energy (DOE) should evaluate this and other conditions in a license application. This paper summarizes the NRC staff`s plans to review DOE`s demonstration of compliance with Part 60 regarding potential flooding of an underground facility. We present these plans recognizing that the Congress is currently considering changes in how a HLW repository would be licensed.

Coleman, N.M.; Wescott, R.G.; Johnson, T.L. [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States)

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

214

Review of the Argonne National Laboratory Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility Readiness Assessment (Implementation Verification Review Sections), Novvember 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility Readiness Assessment (Implementation Verification Review Sections) May 2011 November 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1

215

Better Buildings Federal Award  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Better Buildings Federal Award recognizes the Federal Government's highest-performing buildings through a competition to reduce annual energy use intensity (Btu per square foot of facility space) on a year-over-year basis.

216

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Honeywell Federal Manufacturing and Technologies- September 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether Honeywell Federal Manufacturing and Technologies / New Mexico is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

217

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Honeywell Federal Manufacturing and Technologies- November 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether Honeywell Federal Manufacturing and Technologies' Kansas City Plant is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

218

A literature review of the market effects of federal biofuel policy and recommendations for future policy.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??The United States has had a federal biofuels policy since the 1970s. The purpose of this policy was to help the development of a biofuel (more)

Ayers, Alex

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

219

Combined Heat and Power: A Federal Manager's Resource Guide, March 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Report providing guidance to Federal Energy Managers regarding the potential of CHP technologies in Federal facilities.

220

Columbia River System Operation Review on Selecting an Operating Strategy for the Federal Columbia River Power System; 21Feb1997  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Bonneville Power Administration Columbia River System Operation Review on Selecting an Operating Strategy for the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy (DOE) ACTION: Record of Decision (ROD) SUMMARY: The Columbia River System Operation Review (SOR) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) assessed operations at the 14 Federal dams and reservoirs on the Columbia and lower Snake Rivers that have a major influence on the multiple purpose system operation, and for which power production is coordinated under the Pacific Northwest Coordination Agreement. Lead agencies for this six-year process were the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility Restart Operational Readiness Review Pre- Visit  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NNSS-2011-04-28 NNSS-2011-04-28 Site: Nevada National Security Site Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility Restart Operational Readiness Review Pre- Visit Dates of Activity: 04/25/2011 - 04/28/2011 Report Preparer William Macon Activity Description/Purpose: In coordination with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Service Center, the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) site lead participated in a pre-visit for the NNSA Operational Readiness Review (ORR) of the Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER) facility restart conducted April 25-28, 2011. The site lead also participated

222

Review of Safety Basis Development for the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of5 of5 U.S. Department of Energy Subject: Review of Safety Basis Development for the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility - Inspection Criteria, Approach, and Line:~ HS: Rev: Eff. Date: HSS CRAD 45-57 0 January 31,2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Acting Direc or, Office of Sifety and Emergency Management Evaluations Date: January 31, 2013 Criteria Review and Approach Document LL.v. ~·M Criteria Lead:ife\riew of Safety Basis Development for the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Page 1 of 5 Date: January 31, 2013 1.0 PURPOSE Within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), the Office of Enforcement and Oversight, Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) mission is to assess the effectiveness of the

223

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Review at the Nevada National Security Site  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NNSS-2011-001 NNSS-2011-001 Site: Nevada National Security Site Subject: Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Review at the Nevada National Security Site Dates of Activity 02/14/2011 - 02/17/2011 Report Preparer William Macon Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), visited the Nevada Site Office (NSO) and the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) from February 14-17, 2011. The purpose of the visit was to observe the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) review and maintain operational awareness of NNSS activities. Result:

224

DOE High Performance Computing Operational Review (HPCOR): Enabling Data-Driven Scientific Discovery at HPC Facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) High Performance Computing (HPC) facilities are on the verge of a paradigm shift in the way they deliver systems and services to science and engineering teams. Research projects are producing a wide variety of data at unprecedented scale and level of complexity, with community-specific services that are part of the data collection and analysis workflow. On June 18-19, 2014 representatives from six DOE HPC centers met in Oakland, CA at the DOE High Performance Operational Review (HPCOR) to discuss how they can best provide facilities and services to enable large-scale data-driven scientific discovery at the DOE national laboratories. The report contains findings from that review.

Gerber, Richard; Allcock, William; Beggio, Chris; Campbell, Stuart; Cherry, Andrew; Cholia, Shreyas; Dart, Eli; England, Clay; Fahey, Tim; Foertter, Fernanda; Goldstone, Robin; Hick, Jason; Karelitz, David; Kelly, Kaki; Monroe, Laura; Prabhat,; Skinner, David; White, Julia

2014-10-17T23:59:59.000Z

225

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 1997 / Notices collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: May 16, 1997. Gloria Parker, Director, Information Resources Management Group. Office of Management Type of Review: New. Title: Department of Education Federal Cash Award Certification Statement and Department of Education Federal Cash Quarterly Confirmation Statement. Frequency: Annually. Affected Public: Business or other for- profit; Not for Profit institutions; Federal Government; State, Local or Tribal Government, SEAs or LEAs. Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 12,000. Burden Hours: 38,160. Abstract: The collection of the Federal Cash Award Statement is necessary for the Agency to monitor cash advanced to

226

Review of Safety Basis Development for the Los Alamos National Laboratory Transuranic Waste Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of6 of6 Subject: Review of Safety Basis HS: HSS CRAD 45-59 U.S. Department of Development for the Los Alamos Rev: 0 National Laboratory Transuranic Eff. Date: May 6, 2013 Energy Waste Facility - Criteria and Review Approach Document Office of Safety and ~ Emergency Management Acting Djector, Of~e of Safety and Evaluations Emergency Management Evaluations Date: May 6, 2013 firo,~ Page 1of6 Criteria and Review e;dJatnes 0. Low Approach Document Date: May 6, 2013 1.0 PURPOSE Within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), the Office of Enforcement and Oversight, Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) mission is to assess the effectiveness of the environment, safety, health, and emergency management systems and practices used by line and

227

Review of Natural Phenomena Hazards (NPH) Requirements Currently Applied to the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of Natural Phenomena Hazards (NPH) Requirements Currently Applied to the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF) By: Integrated NPH Team: David Luke, Lead, TJSO Rusty Sprouse, JSA Michael A. Epps, TJSO Richard Korynta, TJSO

228

Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

1 Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers Federal Facilities Guide to Fuel Cells May 8, 2012 - Outline * Distributed Generation and...

229

Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers This...

230

VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM ONSITE REVIEW, Fluor Federal Services Richland, Washington February 26- March 2, 2001  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report summarizes the results of the HSS DOE-VPP Teams evaluation of Fluor Federal Services Richland, Washington during the period of February 26 - March 2, 2001, and provides the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer with the necessary information to make the final decision regarding the companys continued participation in DOE-VPP as a Star site.

231

Technical Review of Retrieval and Closure Plans for the INEEL INTEC Tank Farm Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to document the conclusions of a technical review of retrieval and closure plans for the Idaho National Energy and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC) Tank Farm Facility. In addition to reviewing retrieval and closure plans for these tanks, the review process served as an information exchange mechanism so that staff in the INEEL High Level Waste (HLW) Program could become more familiar with retrieval and closure approaches that have been completed or are planned for underground storage tanks at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and Hanford sites. This review focused not only on evaluation of the technical feasibility and appropriateness of the approach selected by INEEL but also on technology gaps that could be addressed through utilization of technologies or performance data available at other DOE sites and in the private sector. The reviewers, Judith Bamberger of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Dr. Barry Burks of The Providence Group Applied Technology, have extensive experience in the development and application of tank waste retrieval technologies for nuclear waste remediation.

Bamberger, Judith A; Burks, Barry L; Quigley, Keith D; Falter, Diedre D

2001-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

232

Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis and Safety Design Basis Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1104-2009 May 2009 Superseding DOE-STD-1104-96 DOE STANDARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS AND SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1104-2009 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards web page at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1104-2009 iii CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. v INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................

233

Operational readiness review for the Waste Experimental Reduction Facility. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An Operational Readiness Review (ORR) at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory`s (INEL`s) Waste Experimental Reduction Facility (WERF) was conducted by EG&G Idaho, Inc., to verify the readiness of WERF to resume operations following a shutdown and modification period of more than two years. It is the conclusion of the ORR Team that, pending satisfactory resolution of all pre-startup findings, WERF has achieved readiness to resume unrestricted operations within the approved safety basis. ORR appraisal forms are included in this report.

Not Available

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona Photo of a Parabolic-Trough Solar Water-Heating System Installed at the Federal Correctional Institution Facility north of...

235

Better Buildings Federal Award 2012 Competition  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Better Buildings Federal Award recognizes the Federal Government's highest-performing buildings through a competition to reduce annual energy use intensity (Btu per square foot of facility...

236

CRAD, Configuration Management- Los Alamos National Laboratory Weapons Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Configuration Management program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Weapons Facility.

237

CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health- Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a February 2006 Commencement of Operations assessment of the Occupational Safety and Industrial Hygiene programs at the MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility at the Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project.

238

CRAD, Training- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a January 2005 assessment of the Training Program at the Y-12 - Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility.

239

CRAD, Management- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a January 2005 assessment of Management program at the Y-12 - Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility.

240

CRAD, Management- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Management portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

CRAD, Maintenance- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Maintenance Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

242

CRAD, Engineering- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Engineering Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

243

CRAD, Safety Basis- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Safety Basis portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

244

CRAD, Emergency Management- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Emergency Management Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

245

CRAD, Environmental Protection- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Environmental Compliance Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

246

CRAD, Fire Protection- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Fire Protection Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

247

CRAD, Training- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Training Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

248

CRAD, DOE Oversight- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Conduct of Operations Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

249

CRAD, Conduct of Operations- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Conduct of Operations Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

250

CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Occupational and Industrial Safety and Hygiene Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

251

CRAD, Radiological Controls- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Radiation Protection Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

252

CRAD, Quality Assurance- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Quality Assurance Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

253

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Training Training The Federal Energy Management Program offers training to help Federal agencies implement energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs). Introduction to Alternative Financing for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy: Covers the use of project funding tools to plan and implement energy and water saving measures and renewable energy systems in Federal facilities. Recorded June 29, 2010. Introduction to Energy Savings Performance Contracts: Outlines how ESPCs can help Federal agencies implement renewable energy, energy efficiency, and water efficiency projects. Recorded June 30, 2010. Financing and Pricing Evaluation for Energy Savings Performance Contracts: Offers a brief overview of costs and pricing review of the ESPC final proposal and how ESPCs can fund the reduction of Federal facility energy use and costs. Recorded July 7, 2010.

254

Kitchen Appliance Upgrades Improve Water Efficiency at DOD Exchange Facilities: Best Management Practice Case Study #11: Commercial Kitchen Equipment (Brochure), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

kitchens are often forgotten when people kitchens are often forgotten when people begin to think about performing water audits. Kitchens can be out of sight, out of mind; a commercial kitchen, however, can consume large amounts of water and energy if inefficient appliances are installed. The Exchange, formerly the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES), is taking a leadership role in water efficiency improvements in their commercial kitchens by integrating water efficiency concepts into the organization's overall sustainability plan and objectives. The Exchange is a joint military activity, the U.S. Department of Defense's (DOD) oldest and largest retailer. The Exchange provides merchandise and services to military personnel, operating more than 3,100 facilities FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

255

Kitchen Appliance Upgrades Improve Water Efficiency at DOD Exchange Facilities: Best Management Practice Case Study #11: Commercial Kitchen Equipment (Brochure), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

kitchens are often forgotten when people kitchens are often forgotten when people begin to think about performing water audits. Kitchens can be out of sight, out of mind; a commercial kitchen, however, can consume large amounts of water and energy if inefficient appliances are installed. The Exchange, formerly the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES), is taking a leadership role in water efficiency improvements in their commercial kitchens by integrating water efficiency concepts into the organization's overall sustainability plan and objectives. The Exchange is a joint military activity, the U.S. Department of Defense's (DOD) oldest and largest retailer. The Exchange provides merchandise and services to military personnel, operating more than 3,100 facilities FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

256

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act,  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Delicious

257

Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Documents (Documented Safety Analyses and Technical Safety Requirements)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 1996 February 1996 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 2 Date November 2005 DOE STANDARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS DOCUMENTS (DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES AND TECHNICAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS) U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, Fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Adminis tration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000.

258

Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide Review Questions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oak Ridge Operations Oak Ridge Operations Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide Review Questions Name: Organization: Directions: This is an open-book evaluation. Complete the questions, and submit your answers (hand-written or electronically) to the Training Center. Someone will check and grade your answers. If you achieve a score of at least 80%, you will receive a completion certificate. Questions: 1. What is safety basis (SB)? 2. How does SB fit with integrated safety management (ISM)? 3. In what primary DOE documents can requirements and guidance for SB be found? 4. What are the "graded approach" factors that DOE takes into account in ensuring that the level of analysis and documentation and the actions used to comply with the requirements are

259

Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide Review Questions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oak Ridge Operations Oak Ridge Operations Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide Review Questions Name: Organization: Directions: This is an open-book evaluation. Complete the questions, and submit your answers (hand-written or electronically) to the Training Center. Someone will check and grade your answers. If you achieve a score of at least 80%, you will receive a completion certificate. Questions: 1. What is safety basis (SB)? 2. How does SB fit with integrated safety management (ISM)? 3. In what primary DOE documents can requirements and guidance for SB be found? 4. What are the "graded approach" factors that DOE takes into account in ensuring that the level of analysis and documentation and the actions used to comply with the requirements are

260

Requests by Political Candidates to Tour DOE Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REQUESTS BY POLITICAL CANDIDATES TO TOUR DOE FACILITIES REQUESTS BY POLITICAL CANDIDATES TO TOUR DOE FACILITIES * Requests by political candidates to tour DOE facilities are subject to the provisions of the Hatch Act; the statute regulating the political activity of Federal employees. Any proposed site visit by a candidate MUST go through legal review before it can go forward. DOE employees authorizing prohibited political activities by candidates in DOE facilities or on DOE property are subject to penalties under the Hatch act. * DOE employees may not engage in political activity: (1) while on duty; (2) while on Federal property or in a room or building engaged for the purpose of conducting official duties; (3) while wearing a uniform or other item identifying the employee as a Federal employee; or (4) while using a government vehicle. Federal employees may not engage

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

CRAD, Facility Safety- Documented Safety Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) that can be used for assessment of a contractor's Documented Safety Analysis.

262

Recommendations and Justifications for Modifications for Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order with ROTC 1, Revision No. 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Many Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) Use Restrictions (URs) have been established at various corrective action sites (CASs) as part of FFACO corrective actions (FFACO, 1996; as amended January 2007). Since the signing of the FFACO in 1996, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective action (RBCA) have evolved. This document is part of an effort to re-evaluate all FFACO URs against the current RBCA criteria (referred to in this document as the Industrial Sites [IS] RBCA process) as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006c). Based on this evaluation, the URs were sorted into the following categories: 1. Where sufficient information exists to determine that the current UR is consistent with the RCBA criteria 2. Where sufficient information exists to determine that the current UR may be removed or downgraded based on RCBA criteria. 3. Where sufficient information does not exist to evaluate the current UR against the RCBA criteria. After reviewing all the existing FFACO URs, the 49 URs addressed in this document have sufficient information to determine that these current URs may be removed or downgraded based on RCBA criteria. This document presents recommendations on modifications to existing URs that will be consistent with the RCBA criteria.

Lynn Kidman

2008-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

263

Environmental Management Construction Project Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility, July 19-22, 210  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Shadowing of the Environmental Management Construction Project Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility on July 19-22, 2010 A Department of Energy Construction Project Review (CPR) of the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) project was conducted on July 19-22, 2010, at the request of the Principal Deputy Secretary, Office of Environmental Management (EM-2). The purpose of the review was to assess the cost, schedule, and technical progress against the approved Performance Baseline. Specific review areas were Engineering; Commissioning; Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality Assurance; Cost, Schedule, and Risk; and Management and Acquisition.

264

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Weapons Engineering Tritium Facility Tritium Gas Containment Vital Safety System, January 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Review of the Independent Oversight Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Weapons Engineering Tritium Facility Tritium Gas Containment Vital Safety System January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background...................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope................................................................................................................................................ 1

265

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

901 901 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 1, 2004 / Notices As a result of this dispute, the SLA requested the Secretary of Education to convene a Federal arbitration panel to hear this complaint. A panel was convened, and a hearing on this matter was held on May 13, 2002. Arbitration Panel Decision The arbitration panel heard the following issue: whether the Army's alleged failure to negotiate with the SLA in good faith for the full food services and dining facility attendant services contract at Ft. Campbell, Kentucky, constituted a violation of the Act (20 U.S.C. 107 et seq.) and the implementing regulations in 34 CFR part 395. After considering the evidence presented, the majority of the panel ruled that the Act clearly covers all

266

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practicee on Federal Landscaped Grounds  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

W W A S H I N G T O N April 26, 1994 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES SUBJECT: Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practicee on Federal Landscaped Grounds The Report of the National Performance Review contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including one to increase environmentally and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded project.. Environmentally beneficial landscaping entail. utilizing techniques that complement and enhance the local environment and seek to minimize the adverse effects that the landscaping will have on it. In particular, this means using regionally native plants and employing landscaping practices and technologies that conserve water

267

Nuclear Safety Basis Program Review Overview and Management Oversight Standard Review Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This SRP, Nuclear Safety Basis Program Review, consists of five volumes. It provides information to help strengthen the technical rigor of line management oversight and federal monitoring of DOE nuclear facilities. It provides a primer on the safety basis development and documentation process used by the DOE. It also provides a set of LOIs for the review of safety basis programs and documents of nuclear facilities at various stages of the facility life cycle.

268

Federal Technical Capability Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Federal Technical Capability Manual provides the process for the recruitment, deployment, development, and retention of Federal personnel with the demonstrated technical capability to safely accomplish the Departments missions and responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities. Canceled by DOE M 426.1-1A. Does not cancel other directives.

2000-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

269

Use of Metering for Facility and Whole Building Energy Analysis by the U.S. Depratment of Energy Federal Energy Management Program  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This paper details how the U.S. Department of Energy, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is applying metering technology to conduct empirically based analyses o f energy use by federal agencies. Continuing developments in sensors, data...

Devine, K. D.; Mazzucchi, R. P.

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

Federal Energy Management Program: Metering  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Metering to Metering to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Federal Requirements Program Management Commissioning Metering Systems Approaches Process Computerized Maintenance Management Systems Maintenance Types Major Equipment Types Resources Contacts Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Data Center Energy Efficiency Industrial Facilities

271

Lighting Test Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Custom Projects Lighting Test Facilities SSL Guidelines Industrial Federal Agriculture LED Street and Area Lighting Field Test of Exterior LED Down Lights Abstract Outdoor...

272

Review of epidemiology studies of childhood leukaemia near nuclear facilities: commentary on Laurier et al.  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......of childhood leukaemia near nuclear facilities: commentary on...in which the cases lived and nuclear facilities. The key point...We trust that Government policy-makers will take note. CONCLUSION...of childhood leukaemias near nuclear facilities worldwide. The......

Ian Fairlie; Alfred Krblein

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

Federal Energy Capabilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Energy Capabilities Federal Energy Capabilities Federal Energy Capabilities MCKINSTRY'S CYCLE OF SERVICES PROGRAM SERVICES McKinstry is dedicated to excellence in design, construction, and facilities operation. We strive to develop innovative, cost effective facility solutions for you. Below are the services we can deliver under our energy services program: * Design-Build MEDP contracting * Energy savings performance contracting * Smart Building System integration * Demand response * Smart metering to Smart Grid solutions * Advanced metering services * Renewable energy systems * Cogeneration/combined heat power * Creative tax credit and green tags/white tags * ESCO preventative maintenance APPROACH * No premium for the energy services delivery * Open book pricing and guaranteed

274

Low-level liquid radioactive waste treatment at Murmansk, Russia: Technical design and review of facility upgrade and expansion  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The governments of Norway and the US have committed their mutual cooperation and support the Murmansk Shipping Company (MSCo) to expand and upgrade the Low-Level Liquid Radioactive Waste (LLRW) treatment system located at the facilities of the Russian company RTP Atomflot, in Murmansk, Russia. RTP Atomflot provides support services to the Russian icebreaker fleet operated by the MSCo. The objective is to enable Russia to permanently cease disposing of this waste in Arctic waters. The proposed modifications will increase the facility`s capacity from 1,200 m{sup 3} per year to 5,000 m{sup 3} per year, will permit the facility to process high-salt wastes from the Russian Navy`s Northern fleet, and will improve the stabilization and interim storage of the processed wastes. The three countries set up a cooperative review of the evolving design information, conducted by a joint US and Norwegian technical team from April through December, 1995. To ensure that US and Norwegian funds produce a final facility which will meet the objectives, this report documents the design as described by Atomflot and the Russian business organization, ASPECT, both in design documents and orally. During the detailed review process, many questions were generated, and many design details developed which are outlined here. The design is based on the adsorption of radionuclides on selected inorganic resins, and desalination and concentration using electromembranes. The US/Norwegian technical team reviewed the available information and recommended that the construction commence; they also recommended that a monitoring program for facility performance be instituted.

Dyer, R.S.; Diamante, J.M. [Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (United States). Office of International Activities; Duffey, R.B. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)] [and others

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contracts  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Contracts Contracts Getting Started Federal agencies new to the ESPC process should review the ESPC Overview, the FEMP Assistance Guide, and the FAQs. Case studies are also available. When you are ready to get started, contact a FEMP financing specialist. Energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) allow Federal agencies to complete energy-savings projects without up-front capital costs and special Congressional appropriations. An ESPC is a partnership between a Federal agency and an energy service company (ESCO). The ESCO conducts a comprehensive energy audit of Federal facilities and identifies improvements to save energy. In consultation with the Federal agency, the ESCO designs and constructs a project that meets the agency's needs and arranges the necessary funding. The ESCO guarantees that the improvements will generate energy cost savings to pay for the project over the term of the contract (up to 25 years). After the contract ends, all additional cost savings accrue to the agency.

276

Effects of Climate Change on Federal Hydropower (Report to Congress)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), in consultation with the federal Power Marketing Administrations (PMAs) and other federal agencies, including federal dam owners, has prepared a comprehensive assessment examining the effects of climate change on water available for hydropower at federal facilities and on the marketing of power from these federal facilities

277

Facility effluent monitoring plan for the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A facility effluent monitoring plan is required by the US Department of Energy in DOE Order 5400.1 for any operations that involve hazardous materials and radioactive substances that could impact employee or public safety or the environment. This document is prepared using the specific guidelines identified in A Guide for Preparing Hanford Site Facility Effluent Monitoring Plans, WHC-EP-0438-01. This facility effluent monitoring plan assesses effluent monitoring systems and evaluates whether these systems are adequate to ensure the public health and safety as specified in applicable federal, state, and local requirements. This facility effluent monitoring plan will ensure long-range integrity of the effluent monitoring systems by requiring an update whenever a new process or operation introduces new hazardous materials or significant radioactive materials. This document must be reviewed annually even if there are no operational changes, and it must be updated, at a minimum, every 3 years.

Greager, E.M.

1997-12-11T23:59:59.000Z

278

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 1999 / Notices technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3.03 hours per response. It is estimated that any individual may respond to synopses or market research questions 5 times per year. EPA anticipates publicizing approximately 260 contract actions per year, and conducting 3790 market research inquiries. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review

279

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

32 32 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 1999 / Notices that the original selection list would remain in effect. The complainant requested review of the SLA's stipulated decision by a Federal arbitration panel. The panel was convened on April 17, 1998. Arbitration Panel Decision The issue before the arbitration panel was whether the SLA's stipulated decision to make a determination concerning the continuation of the special assignment process at the time a military base became available was inconsistent with the ALJ's determination. The arbitration panel ruled that, at the time a military base contract became available, there may be a compelling reason that would benefit both the program and the complainant that would justify not assigning complainant

280

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

66 66 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 1998 / Notices Dated: July 16, 1998. Richard D. Wilson, Acting Assistant Administrator. [FR Doc. 98-19832 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER-FRL-5494-1] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared July 6, 1998 Through July 10, 1998 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities AT (202) 564-5076. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

CRAD, Criticality Safety- Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Criticality Safety program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, TA 55 SST Facility.

282

CRAD, Criticality Safety- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a January 2005 assessment of the Criticality Safety program at the Y-12 - Enriched Uranium Facility.

283

CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health- Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Industrial Hygiene program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility.

284

CRAD, Configuration Management- Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Configuration Management program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, TA 55 SST Facility.

285

CRAD, Conduct of Operations- Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Conduct of Operations program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, TA 55 SST Facility.

286

CRAD, Conduct of Operations- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a January, 2005 assessment of Conduct of Operations program at the Y-12 - Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility.

287

CRAD, Emergency Management- Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Emergency Management program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility.

288

CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a January 2005 assessment of Industrial Safety and Industrial Health programs at the Y-12 - Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility.

289

CRAD, Radiological Controls- Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Radiation Protection Program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility.

290

CRAD, Radiological Controls- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a January 2005 assessment of the Radiation Protection Program at the Y-12 - Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility.

291

CRAD, Environmental Protection- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a January 2005 assessment of Environmental Compliance program at the Y-12 - Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility.

292

CRAD, DOE Oversight- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a DOE independent oversight assessment of the Y-12 Site Office's programs for oversight of its contractors at the Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility.

293

CRAD, Emergency Management- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a January 2005 assessment of Emergency Management program at the Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility.

294

CRAD, Safety Basis- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a January 2005 assessment of the Safety Basis at the Y-12 - Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility.

295

CRAD, Quality Assurance- Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Quality Assurance Program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility.

296

Facilities and Infrastructure | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Property Profile Federal Facilities Council Interagency Sustainability Working Group US Green Building Council DOE Federal Energy Management Program Performance.gov - Manage...

297

US Department of Energy`s Federal Facility Compliance Act Chief Financial Officer`s Report to Congress for fiscal year 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992 (FFCAct) (Public Law 102-386) was enacted into law on October 6, 1992. In addition to amending the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the FFCAct requires the US Department of Energy (DOE) to prepare an annual report from the Chief Financial Officer to the Congress on compliance activities undertaken by the DOE with regard to mixed waste streams and provide an accounting of the fines and penalties imposed upon the DOE for violations involving mixed waste. This document has been prepared to report the necessary information. Mixed waste is defined by the FFCAct to include those wastes containing both hazardous waste as defined in the RCRA and source, special nuclear, or byproduct material subject to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. Section 2001 et seq.). Section 2 of this report briefly summarizes DOE Headquarters` activities conducted during Fiscal Year 1993 (FY 1993) to comply with the requirements of the FFCAct. Section 3 of this report provides an overview of the site-specific RCRA compliance activities, relating to mixed waste streams, conducted in FY 1993 for those sites that currently generated or store mixed waste that are subject to regulation under RCRA. Section 4 provides information on notifications of alleged RCRA violations involving mixed waste imposed upon the DOE during FY 1993 and an accounting of any fines and penalties associated with these violations. Appendix A provides site-specific summaries of RCRA compliance activities, relating to mixed waste streams, conducted in FY 1993 for those sites that currently generate or store mixed waste that are subject to regulation under RCRA.

Not Available

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

MEASUREMENT AND CALCULATION OF RADIONUCLIDE ACTIVITIES IN SAVANNAH RIVER SITE HIGH LEVEL WASTE SLUDGE FOR ACCEPTANCE OF DEFENSE WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY GLASS IN A FEDERAL REPOSITORY  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper describes the results of the analyses of High Level Waste (HLW) sludge slurry samples and of the calculations necessary to decay the radionuclides to meet the reporting requirement in the Waste Acceptance Product Specifications (WAPS) [1]. The concentrations of 45 radionuclides were measured. The results of these analyses provide input for radioactive decay calculations used to project the radionuclide inventory at the specified index years, 2015 and 3115. This information is necessary to complete the Production Records at Savannah River Site's Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) so that the final glass product resulting from Macrobatch 5 (MB5) can eventually be submitted to a Federal Repository. Five of the necessary input radionuclides for the decay calculations could not be measured directly due to their low concentrations and/or analytical interferences. These isotopes are Nb-93m, Pd-107, Cd-113m, Cs-135, and Cm-248. Methods for calculating these species from concentrations of appropriate other radionuclides will be discussed. Also the average age of the MB5 HLW had to be calculated from decay of Sr-90 in order to predict the initial concentration of Nb-93m. As a result of the measurements and calculations, thirty-one WAPS reportable radioactive isotopes were identified for MB5. The total activity of MB5 sludge solids will decrease from 1.6E+04 {micro}Ci (1 {micro}Ci = 3.7E+04 Bq) per gram of total solids in 2008 to 2.3E+01 {micro}Ci per gram of total solids in 3115, a decrease of approximately 700 fold. Finally, evidence will be given for the low observed concentrations of the radionuclides Tc-99, I-129, and Sm-151 in the HLW sludges. These radionuclides were reduced in the MB5 sludge slurry to a fraction of their expected production levels due to SRS processing conditions.

Bannochie, C; David Diprete, D; Ned Bibler, N

2008-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

299

Appendix C: Criteria Review and Approach Documents, National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2A "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of a table of National Nuclear Security Administration Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADS).

300

2013 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy and Water Management Awards recognize individuals, groups, and agencies for the outstanding use of energy- and water-efficiency technologies at Federal facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Federal Progress Toward Energy/Sustainability Goals | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Progress Toward EnergySustainability Goals Federal Progress Toward EnergySustainability Goals Presentation covers Federal facility efficiency investment and progress toward...

302

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Portsmouth Facility Support Services- March 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether Portsmouth Facility Support Services is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

303

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Facility Engineering Services KCP, LLC- September 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether Facility Engineering Services KCP, LLC is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

304

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Fluor Hanford Fast Flux Test Facility Recertification- October 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether Fluor Hanford Fast Flux Test Facility is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

305

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Waste Sampling and Characterization Facility- May 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation of Waste Sampling and Characterization Facility to make the final decision regarding the companys continued participation in DOE-VPP as a Star site.

306

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Salt Waste Processing Facility Construction Project- February 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether Salt Waste Processing Facility Construction Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

307

Review of the Los Alamos National Laoratory Nuclear Facility Coonfiguration Management Program - March 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Facility Nuclear Facility Configuration Management Program March 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

308

Review of the Los Alamos National Laoratory Nuclear Facility Coonfiguration Management Program - March 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nuclear Facility Nuclear Facility Configuration Management Program March 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

309

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

DOE-STD-1104 contains the Department's method and criteria for reviewing and approving nuclear facility's documented safety analysis (DSA). This review and approval formally document the basis for DOE, concluding that a facility can be operated safely in a manner that adequately protects workers, the public, and the environment. Therefore, it is appropriate to formally require implementation of the review methodology and criteria contained in DOE-STD-1104.

2013-06-21T23:59:59.000Z

310

S. 522: A Bill to provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions of part I of the Federal Power Act for certain transmission facilities associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico. Introduced in the Senate of the United States, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First session  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report discusses a bill that provides for a limited exemption to part I of the Federal Power Act dealing with the hydroelectric licensing provisions for certain transmission facilities associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric project in New Mexico.

NONE

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

311

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Notices Information Officer, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the information collection. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. ED invites public comment at the address specified above. Copies of the requests are available from Patrick J. Sherrill at the address specified above. The Department of Education is

312

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

247 247 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 17, 1996 / Notices by the Secretary of Commerce. The purpose of this meeting is to review the 1996 Award applications and to select applications to be considered in the site visit stage of the evaluation. The applications under review contain trade secrets and proprietary commercial information submitted to the Government in confidence. DATES: The meeting will convene August 7, 1996, at 8:00 a.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on August 7, 1996. The entire meeting will be closed. ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Administration Building, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Harry Hertz, Director for Quality Programs, National Institute of

313

CRAD, Training - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility CRAD, Training - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility May 2007 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2007 readiness assessment of the Training Program at the MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility at the Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Training - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility More Documents & Publications CRAD, Quality Assurance - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility CRAD, Engineering - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility

314

CRAD, Management - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility CRAD, Management - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility May 2007 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May, 2007 readiness assessment of the Management at the MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility at the Idaho National Laboratory, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Management - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility More Documents & Publications CRAD, Engineering - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility

315

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Technology Deployment Working  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technology Deployment Working Group Technology Deployment Working Group Energy Department Announces Interagency Committee to Increase Use of Clean Energy Technologies in Federal Facilities The Senior Executive Committee for Technology Deployment, a subcommittee of the Interagency Technology Deployment Working Group, brings together leaders of technology deployment programs from across the federal government to implement the Obama Administration's comprehensive strategy to reduce energy costs in agency facilities, while boosting American competitiveness in the global clean energy race. Learn more. Technology Briefs Boiler Combustion Control and Monitoring System Doing Time under the Sun Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Centers The Federal Technology Deployment Working Group helps Federal agencies evaluate and deploy new and underutilized technologies.

316

CRAD, Conduct of Operations- Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May, 2007 readiness assessment of the Conduct of Operations program at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project.

317

CRAD, Training- Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2007 readiness assessment of the Training Program at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project.

318

CRAD, Quality Assurance- Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2007 readiness assessment of the Quality Assurance Program at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project.

319

The Federal Endangered Species Act: Is Judicial Review Available to Safeguard against Agency Decisions Not To Enforce?  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Review Available to Safeguard Against Agency Decisions NotUnlike persons who can safeguard their own rights throughupon judicial review as a safeguard against irrational and

Pham, Brandon L.

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

320

Secretary of Energy Recognizes Federal Employees for Efforts...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

arrays, building integrated photovoltaics, solar-powered street lights, and geothermal heat pumps to power federal facilities; Implementation of facility -wide systemic changes...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Review of soil contamination guidance  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A review of existing and proposed radioactive soil contamination standards and guidance was conducted for United Nuclear Corporation (UNC), Office of Surplus Facilities Management. Information was obtained from both government agencies and other sources during a literature survey. The more applicable standards were reviewed, evaluated, and summarized. Information pertaining to soil contamination for both facility operation and facility decommissioning was obtained from a variety of sources. These sources included: the Code of Federal Regulations, regulatory guides, the Federal Register, topical reports written by various government agencies, topical reports written by national laboratories, and publications from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). It was difficult to directly compare the standards and guidance obtained from these sources since each was intended for a specific situation and different units or bases were used. However, most of the information reviewed was consistent with the philosophy of maintaining exposures at levels as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).

Mueller, M.A.; Kennedy, W.E. Jr.; Soldat, J.K.

1981-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

New Course Teaches Best Practices for Water Management for Federal...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

New Course Teaches Best Practices for Water Management for Federal Facilities New Course Teaches Best Practices for Water Management for Federal Facilities May 8, 2014 - 11:13am...

323

DOE Releases Federal Building Metering Guidance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The guidance requires federal agencies to review, revise, and submit to FEMP its metering implementation plan within one year.

324

FEMP (Federal Energy Management Program) Update, Spring 1989  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The FEMP Update, published quarterly by the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP), provides information that will assist federal managers in their energy management responsibilities. The Update is distributed primarily to federal facility and energy management personnel.

Not Available

1989-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

325

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Cell Analysis, Modeling, and Prototyping (CAMP) Facility Research Activities  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation given by Argonne National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about cell analysis,...

326

Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gases  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Greenhouse Gases Greenhouse Gases to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gases on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gases on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gases on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gases on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gases on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gases on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Basics Federal Requirements Guidance & Reporting Inventories & Performance Mitigation Planning Resources Contacts Water Efficiency Data Center Energy Efficiency Industrial Facilities Sustainable Federal Fleets

327

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy Management Energy Management Guidance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject Requirements by Regulation Notices & Rules Guidance Facility Reporting Fleet Reporting Energy Management Guidance The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides guidance on Federal

328

Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Water Efficiency Water Efficiency to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Basics Federal Requirements Best Management Practices Analysis and Evaluation Case Studies Resources Contacts Data Center Energy Efficiency Industrial Facilities Sustainable Federal Fleets

329

Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Illness Compensation Program Pamphlet Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Accident Investigation Reports Nuclear Safety Facility Safety Security Classification...

330

Review of the Facility Representative Program at the Idaho Site, March 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of the Facility Representative Program at the Idaho Site March 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose.................................................................................................................................................. ! 2.0 Scope ..................................................................................................................................................... ! 3.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Results ..................................................................................................................................................

331

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Facility Engineering Services KCP, LLC- November 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report summarizes the results of the HSS DOE-VPP Teams evaluation of Facilities Engineering Services KCP, LLC during the period of November 10-21, 2008, and provides the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer with the necessary information to make the final decision regarding the companys continued participation in DOE-VPP as a Star site.

332

EPA Review of Standards for Uranium and Thorium Milling Facilities @ 40 CFR Parts 61 and 192.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

will address the following seven questions: 1. Are the existing radiation dose limits in the regulations and results in estimating doses to the public from uranium recovery facilities? 6. What is known about, Part 4) *NOTE: a millirem is a unit of effective radiation dose. It is related to the amount of energy

333

Review of neutron calibration facilities and monitoring techniques: new needs for emerging fields  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation...Proposal for an accelerator-based neutron...R. O. LANSCE nuclear science facilities...light-ion linear accelerator and neutron source...Imahori Y. In-situ vacuum deposition technique...the Birmingham Accelerator-Generated epIthermal......

V. Gressier

2014-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Review of the Facility Representative Program at the Idaho Site, March 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of the Facility Representative Program at the Idaho Site March 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose.................................................................................................................................................. ! 2.0 Scope ..................................................................................................................................................... ! 3.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Results ..................................................................................................................................................

335

CRAD, Quality Assurance - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Quality Assurance - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility Quality Assurance - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility CRAD, Quality Assurance - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility May 2007 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2007 readiness assessment of the Quality Assurance Program at the MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility at the Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Quality Assurance - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility More Documents & Publications CRAD, Engineering - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility

336

CRAD, Engineering - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility CRAD, Engineering - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility May 2007 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2007 readiness assessment of the Engineering program at the MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility at the Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Engineering - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility More Documents & Publications CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility

337

Federal Register Notice for Draft Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas from the United States  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy announces the availability for public review and comment of the Draft Addendum To Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports Of...

338

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

146 146 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 122 / Friday, June 23, 2000 / Notices instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. EPA estimates that the changes discussed today, when implemented, will reduce burden by 23,000 hours and an insignificant number of dollars. Dated: June 14, 2000. Elizabeth Cotsworth, Director, Office of Solid Waste.

339

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

87 87 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 173 / Thursday, September 5, 1996 / Notices of burden accurate, (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: August 29, 1996. Gloria Parker, Director, Information Resources Group. Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Type of Review: New. Title: Guidance on the Goals 2000 Amendments (Draft). Frequency: One-time submission. Affected Public: State, local or Tribal Gov't, SEAs or LEAs. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 30 Burden Hours: 3,000 Abstract: The Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of

340

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

30 30 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 214 / Friday, November 5, 1999 / Notices natural or human environment. Because no significant environmental impacts will result from implementation of the proposed action, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and will not be prepared. The Army will not initiate the proposed action for 15 days following the completion of the EA and FNSI and publication of a public notice in a local newspaper. This EA is available for review at the following repositories: Lassen Community College Library, Highway 139, P.O. Box 3000, Susanville, CA 96130; Lassen County Public Works, 707 Nevada Street, Suite 2, Susanville, CA 96130; and the Washoe County Library, Downtown Branch, 301 South Center Street, Reno NV 89501. Dated: November 1, 1999.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Facility effluent monitoring plan for 242-A evaporator facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A facility effluent monitoring plan is required by the U.S. Department of Energy in DOE Order 5400.1 for any operations that involve hazardous materials and radioactive substances that could affect employee or public safety or the environment. A facility effluent monitoring plan determination was performed during Calendar Year 1991 and the evaluation showed the need for a facility effluent monitoring plan. This document is prepared using the specific guidelines identified in A Guide for Preparing Hanford Site Facility Effluent Monitoring Plans, WHC-EP-0438-1. This facility effluent monitoring plan assesses effluent monitoring systems and evaluates whether they are adequate to ensure the public health and safety as specified in applicable federal, state, and local requirements. This facility effluent monitoring plan shall ensure long-range integrity of the effluent monitoring systems by requiring an update whenever a new process or operation introduces new hazardous materials or significant radioactive materials. This document must be reviewed annually even if there are no operational changes, and it must be updated, as a minimum, every three years.

Crummel, G.M.; Gustavson, R.D.

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

Western Business Rountable: Coordination of Federal Authorizations for  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Western Business Rountable: Coordination of Federal Authorizations Western Business Rountable: Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities Western Business Rountable: Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities The Western Business Roundtable ("Roundtable") respectfully submits the following comments relating to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) request for public comments regarding implementation of its transmission siting obligations under Section 216(h) of the Federal Power Act. Western Business Rountable: Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities More Documents & Publications Comments Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing section 216(h): Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal

343

Review Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety & Emergency Management Evaluations Safety & Emergency Management Evaluations » Review Reports Review Reports December 31, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant, December 2013 Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant December 30, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Facility - December 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program and Fire Protection Systems at the Transuranic Waste Processing Center December 13, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - December 2013 Review of the Technical Area 55 Safety Class Fire Suppression System at Los Alamos National Laboratory December 13, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security Site, December 2013

344

Facilities Initiatives | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facilities Facilities Initiatives Facilities Initiatives The Headquarters Office of Administration, Office of Logistics and Facility Operations, has several energy saving initiatives in place or in progress at their Headquarters' facilities in the Forrestal Building in Washington, DC, and Germantown Maryland. Many of these initiatives are part of their Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC). ESPCs allow Federal agencies to accomplish energy savings projects without up-front capital costs and without special Congressional appropriations. DOE ESPCs help Federal agencies meet energy efficiency, renewable energy, water conservation, and emissions reduction goals by streamlining contract funding for energy management projects. For more information on ESPCs visit the Federal Energy

345

Operating experience review -- Conduct of operations at Department of Energy facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This research examined human error related occurrences, reported in the ORPS database, for the purpose of identifying weaknesses in the implementation of the guidance regarding the Conduct of Operations contained in DOE 5480.19. Specifically, this research examined three separate samples of occurrence reports from Defense Program facilities, which cited human error as a direct or contributing cause. These reports were evaluated using a coding scheme which incorporated the guidelines present in 5480.19, as well as a number of generic human factors concerns. The second chapter of this report summarizes the coding scheme which was used to evaluate the occurrence reports. Since the coding scheme is quite lengthy, only the parts of the scheme needed to make the remainder of the report clear are included in this chapter. Details on the development and content of the coding scheme are reported in Appendices A, B, and C. Chapter 3 presents the analysis of three different data sets. This chapter demonstrates that similar results were obtained across different data sets, collected at different points in time, and coded by different raters. The implications of the results obtained in Chapter 3 are discussed in Chapter 4. This chapter makes a number of suggestions for reducing the problems found in the occurrence reports. Chapter 5 applies the methodology that has been developed in this report to two facilities at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Finally, Chapter 6 reiterates the major findings of this report. Several additional analyses appear in appendices at the end of this report.

Not Available

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

A review of experiments and results from the transient reactor test (TREAT) facility.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The TREAT Facility was designed and built in the late 1950s at Argonne National Laboratory to provide a transient reactor for safety experiments on samples of reactor fuels. It first operated in 1959. Throughout its history, experiments conducted in TREAT have been important in establishing the behavior of a wide variety of reactor fuel elements under conditions predicted to occur in reactor accidents ranging from mild off normal transients to hypothetical core disruptive accidents. For much of its history, TREAT was used primarily to test liquid-metal reactor fuel elements, initially for the Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (EBR-II), then for the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF), the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP), the British Prototype Fast Reactor (PFR), and finally, for the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR). Both oxide and metal elements were tested in dry capsules and in flowing sodium loops. The data obtained were instrumental in establishing the behavior of the fuel under off-normal and accident conditions, a necessary part of the safety analysis of the various reactors. In addition, TREAT was used to test light-water reactor (LWR) elements in a steam environment to obtain fission-product release data under meltdown conditions. Studies are now under way on applications of TREAT to testing of the behavior of high-burnup LWR elements under reactivity-initiated accident (RIA) conditions using a high-pressure water loop.

Deitrich, L. W.

1998-07-28T23:59:59.000Z

347

Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 168 - August 29, 2013 Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of...

348

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Water Efficiency Water Efficiency The following Federal laws and regulations require Federal agencies to reduce water use and improve water efficiency. Executive Order 13423 Executive Order (E.O.) 13423 requires Federal agencies to reduce water consumption intensity (gallons per square foot) 2% annually through the end of fiscal year (FY) 2015 or 16% by the end of FY 2015 from a 2007 baseline. This requirement is to be achieved incrementally by fiscal year beginning in 2008. Fiscal Year Percentage Reduction 2008 2 2009 4 2010 6 2011 8 2012 10 2013 12 2014 14 2015 16 E.O. 13423 Mandated Facility Water Intensity Reductions by Fiscal Year E.O. 13423 also directs Federal facilities to conduct annual water audits of at least 10% of facility square footage and to conduct audits at least

349

Review of the Hanford Site K-West Annex Facility Layup Program for Construction Suspension/Delay, June 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HSS Independent Activity Report - HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR-Hanford-2013-06-10 Site: Hanford Site Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Review of the Hanford Site K-West Annex Facility Layup Program for Construction Suspension/Delay Dates of Activity : June 10, 2013 Report Preparer: Joseph Lenahan Activity Description/Purpose: 1. Perform an inspection of the project site to examine the contractor's actions to protect completed work from deteriorating during the current suspension of construction work activities. 2. Inspect storage areas to determine if construction materials are stored in a manner that will prevent deterioration during possible long-term storage while construction work is suspended.

350

Review of the Hanford Site K-West Annex Facility Layup Program for Construction Suspension/Delay, June 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HSS Independent Activity Report - HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR-Hanford-2013-06-10 Site: Hanford Site Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Review of the Hanford Site K-West Annex Facility Layup Program for Construction Suspension/Delay Dates of Activity : June 10, 2013 Report Preparer: Joseph Lenahan Activity Description/Purpose: 1. Perform an inspection of the project site to examine the contractor's actions to protect completed work from deteriorating during the current suspension of construction work activities. 2. Inspect storage areas to determine if construction materials are stored in a manner that will prevent deterioration during possible long-term storage while construction work is suspended.

351

CRAD, Maintenance - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility CRAD, Maintenance - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Maintenance program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Maintenance - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility More Documents & Publications CRAD, Maintenance - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility CRAD, Configuration Management - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST

352

Federal Register Notice for Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas from the United States  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability of the Addendum To Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports Of Natural Gas From The United...

353

Meeting Federal Energy Security Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Markel Markel SRA International Lawrence_Markel@sra.com Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Fall 2012 - October 16-17 Mobile, AL Sponsored by Alabama Power Theme Meeting energy security requirements in federal facilities provides opportunities for additional types of cooperation between utilities and the federal agencies. However, there are significant barriers to pursuing these opportunities - constraints on utilities and on federal agencies, as well as sometimes-competing objectives. Energy security encompasses sufficiency, surety, and sustainability.  Above all, energy security means having adequate power to conduct critical operations for the duration required (sufficiency).  Secondarily, and leading to sufficiency, is ensuring resilient energy supplies that are accessible when

354

Review of Catalytic Hydrogen Generation in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Chemical Processing Cell  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report was prepared to fulfill the Phase I deliverable for HLW/DWPF/TTR-98-0018, Rev. 2, ''Hydrogen Generation in the DWPF Chemical Processing Cell'', 6/4/2001. The primary objective for the preliminary phase of the hydrogen generation study was to complete a review of past data on hydrogen generation and to prepare a summary of the findings. The understanding was that the focus should be on catalytic hydrogen generation, not on hydrogen generation by radiolysis. The secondary objective was to develop scope for follow-up experimental and analytical work. The majority of this report provides a summary of past hydrogen generation work with radioactive and simulated Savannah River Site (SRS) waste sludges. The report also includes some work done with Hanford waste sludges and simulants. The review extends to idealized systems containing no sludge, such as solutions of sodium formate and formic acid doped with a noble metal catalyst. This includes general information from the literature, as well as the focused study done by the University of Georgia for the SRS. The various studies had a number of points of universal agreement. For example, noble metals, such as Pd, Rh, and Ru, catalyze hydrogen generation from formic acid and formate ions, and more acid leads to more hydrogen generation. There were also some points of disagreement between different sources on a few topics such as the impact of mercury on the noble metal catalysts and the identity of the most active catalyst species. Finally, there were some issues of potential interest to SRS that apparently have not been systematically studied, e.g. the role of nitrite ion in catalyst activation and reactivity. The review includes studies covering the period from about 1924-2002, or from before the discovery of hydrogen generation during simulant sludge processing in 1988 through the Shielded Cells qualification testing for Sludge Batch 2. The review of prior studies is followed by a discussion of proposed experimental work, additional data analysis, and future modeling programs. These proposals have led to recent investigations into the mercury issue and the effect of co-precipitating noble metals which will be documented in two separate reports. SRS hydrogen generation work since 2002 will also be collected and summarized in a future report on the effect of noble metal-sludge matrix interactions on hydrogen generation. Other potential factors for experimental investigation include sludge composition variations related to both the washing process and to the insoluble species with particular attention given to the role of silver and to improving the understanding of the interaction of nitrite ion with the noble metals.

Koopman, D. C.

2004-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

355

DOE FTCP Supplemental Competencies - Human Factors Engineering Functional Area Qualification Competency Examples for DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FTCP FTCP SUPPLEMENTAL COMPETENCIES HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION COMPETENCY EXAMPLES For DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving qualification standards and competencies for Department-wide application. Approval of this set of competency statements by the Federal Technical Capability Panel is indicated by signature below. ?fuv-~ Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson ~·/Cf I Federal Technical Capability Panel * '2._ 3/19/12 I luman Factors Engineering compc1cncics U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

356

Energy Smart Federal Partnership: Your Steps to Energy Savings  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Smart Federal Partnership: Your Steps to Energy Savings Energy Smart Federal Partnership: Your Steps to Energy Savings 1. Review your facilities and commitment to efficiency investments  Communicate with key facilities staff including the people that will approve the energy project budgets.  Determine if the energy-saving opportunities meet your agency's requirements for investment (such as project payback) and are likely to receive funding approval.  Contact your local serving utility or utilities to discuss your plans and understand the process for obtaining financial assistance (incentives). If you are unsure who your serving utility is, please contact BPA and we will help. Another good resource for locating utilities can be found our website: http://www.bpa.gov/Energy/N/UtilityLocator.cfm.

357

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 The Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability requested information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. Infrastructure projects - such as high voltage, long distance, electric transmission facilities - often involve multiple Federal, State, local and Tribal authorizations and are subject to a wide array of processes and procedural requirements in order to obtain all necessary permits and other authorizations. Delays in securing required statutory reviews, permits, and consultations can threaten the completion

358

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 The Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability requested information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. Infrastructure projects - such as high voltage, long distance, electric transmission facilities - often involve multiple Federal, State, local and Tribal authorizations and are subject to a wide array of processes and procedural requirements in order to obtain all necessary permits and other authorizations. Delays in securing required statutory reviews, permits, and consultations can threaten the completion

359

Transpired Solar Collector at NREL's Waste Handling Facility Uses Solar Energy to Heat Ventilation Air (Fact Sheet) (Revised), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Highlights Highlights System Size 300 ft 2 transpired solar collector Energy Production About 125 Btu/hr/ft 2 (400 W/m 2 ) of heat delivery under ideal conditions (full sun) Installation Date 1990 Motivation Provide solar-heated ventilation air to offset some of the heating with conventional electric resistance heaters Annual Savings 14,310 kWh (49 million Btu/yr) or about 26% of the energy required to heat the facility's ventilation air System Details Components Black, 300 ft 2 corrugated aluminum transpired solar collector with a porosity of 2%; bypass damper; two-speed 3000 CFM vane axial supply fan; electric duct heater; thermostat controller Storage None Loads 188 million Btu/year (55,038 kWh/year) winter average to heat 1,300 ft 2 Waste Handling Facility

360

Transpired Solar Collector at NREL's Waste Handling Facility Uses Solar Energy to Heat Ventilation Air (Fact Sheet) (Revised), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Highlights Highlights System Size 300 ft 2 transpired solar collector Energy Production About 125 Btu/hr/ft 2 (400 W/m 2 ) of heat delivery under ideal conditions (full sun) Installation Date 1990 Motivation Provide solar-heated ventilation air to offset some of the heating with conventional electric resistance heaters Annual Savings 14,310 kWh (49 million Btu/yr) or about 26% of the energy required to heat the facility's ventilation air System Details Components Black, 300 ft 2 corrugated aluminum transpired solar collector with a porosity of 2%; bypass damper; two-speed 3000 CFM vane axial supply fan; electric duct heater; thermostat controller Storage None Loads 188 million Btu/year (55,038 kWh/year) winter average to heat 1,300 ft 2 Waste Handling Facility

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution -  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment

362

Why Are the DUF6 Conversion Facility EISs Needed?  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Why is an EIS Needed Why is an EIS Needed Why the Depleted UF6 Conversion Facility EISs Are Needed The two Depleted UF6 Conversion EISs are needed to assess the potential environmental impacts of constructing, operating, maintaining, and decontaminating and decommissioning DUF6 conversion facilities at the Paducah and Portsmouth sites. National Environmental Policy Act Federal laws and regulations require the federal government to evaluate the effects of its actions on the environment and to consider alternative courses of action. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) specifies when an environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared. NEPA regulations require, among other things, federal agencies to include discussion of a proposed action and the range of reasonable alternatives in an EIS. Sufficient information must be included in the EIS for reviewers to evaluate the relative merits of each alternative. Council for Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations provide the recommended format and content of Environmental Impact Statements.

363

Facility effluent monitoring plan for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Module 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A facility effluent monitoring plan is required by the US Department of Energy in Order 5400.1 for any operations that involve hazardous materials and radioactive substances that could impact employee or public safety or the environment. This document is prepared using the specific guidelines identified in A Guide for Preparing Hanford Site Facility Effluent Monitoring Plans, WHC-EP-0438. This facility effluent monitoring plan assesses effluent monitoring systems and evaluates whether they are adequate to ensure the public health and safety as specified in applicable federal state, and local requirements. This facility effluent monitoring plan shall ensure lonq-range integrity of the effluent monitoring systems by requiring an update whenever a new process or operation introduces new hazardous materials or significant radioactive materials. This document must be reviewed annually even if there are no operational changes, and it must be updated as a minimum every three years.

Lewis, C.J.

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

364

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2004 Annual Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capalbility Program Federal Technical Capalbility Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 Annual Plan November 20,2003 FTCP Annual Plan. FY 2004 INTRODUCTION The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program (Program) is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The current Program was formalized in 1998 through Department directives DOE P 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Program for Defense Nuclear Facilities, and DOE M 426. l-l, Federal Technical Capability Manual. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) provides leadership in implementing the Program. The FTCP consists of senior technical safety managers representing nuclear facilities,

365

U.S. Army Energy and Environmental Requirements and Goals: Opportunities for Fuel Cells and Hydrogen- Facility Locations and Hydrogen Storage/Delivery Logistics  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Overview of DoD Energy Use, Federal Facilities Goals and Requirements, Federal Vehicles and Fuel Goals, Opportunities & Conclusions

366

340 Facility compliance assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This study provides an environmental compliance evaluation of the RLWS and the RPS systems of the 340 Facility. The emphasis of the evaluation centers on compliance with WAC requirements for hazardous and mixed waste facilities, federal regulations, and Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) requirements pertinent to the operation of the 340 Facility. The 340 Facility is not covered under either an interim status Part A permit or a RCRA Part B permit. The detailed discussion of compliance deficiencies are summarized in Section 2.0. This includes items of significance that require action to ensure facility compliance with WAC, federal regulations, and WHC requirements. Outstanding issues exist for radioactive airborne effluent sampling and monitoring, radioactive liquid effluent sampling and monitoring, non-radioactive liquid effluent sampling and monitoring, less than 90 day waste storage tanks, and requirements for a permitted facility.

English, S.L. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities-Interim Final Rule and Proposed Rule Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities-Interim Final Rule and Proposed Rule The utility operating companies of the American Electric Power System1 ("AEP") commend the Department of Energy ("DOE") for its ongoing commitment to implement the provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ("EPAct"), specifically, as addressed here, the DOE's continuing effort to establish procedures under which entities may request that DOE coordinate Federal authorizations for the siting of interstate transmission facilities. Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities-Interim Final Rule and Proposed Rule

368

The digital preservation facility  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Critical listening should be an essential part of all archiving and restoration facilities quality control. We review the priorities and requirements for listening spaces ranging from the individual collector and small community archives to large?scale facilities. Examples discussed include the Library of Congress Culpepper facility university libraries and commercial facilities. Adapting listening rooms to the requirements of n?channel audio are discussed. Public recommendations of the Sound Preservation Board of the Library of Congress will be reviewed.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

Federal Register  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

151 151 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 203 Friday, October 20, 1995 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal IRegulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1610. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Western Area Power Administration 10 CFR Part 905 Energy Planning and Management Program AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE. A cmoN: Final rule. summARv: The Western Area Power Administration is publishing this final rule to adopt an Energy Planning and

370

ARM - Facility News Article  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

April 7, 2011 [Facility News] April 7, 2011 [Facility News] Review Panel States ARM Facility "Without Peer" Bookmark and Share Every three years, DOE Office of Science user facilities undergo a review to evaluate their effectiveness in contributing to their respective science areas. The latest ARM Facility review was conducted in mid-February by a six-member review panel led by Minghua Zhang of Stony Brook University. Notably, in a debriefing following the review, the panel stated that ARM was a "world class facility without peer." The panel convened in Ponca City, Oklahoma, near ARM's Southern Great Plains site to conduct their review. Their first agenda item was an SGP site tour, which provided a realtime example of the scope and expertise of site operations and included a demonstration of the site's newly

371

Book Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Copyright 2003 Book Review Book Review Book Review Frank Land 1 1 Emeritus...Economics, UK 526 BOOK REVIEWS discusses some basic concepts...the programming language Standard ML: CML (Concurrrent ML), Facile and PLAN (Packet Language for Active......

Frank Land

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

CRAD, Training - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility CRAD, Training - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility January 2005 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a January 2005 assessment of the Training Program at the Y-12 - Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Training - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility More Documents & Publications CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide

373

Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products January 2013 Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Welcome to the seventh issue of Federal Energy-Efficient Product Procurement! This bi-monthly update helps Federal procurement officials, facility managers, and others remain up to date on events, training, technology, and changes to acquisition requirements.

374

2010 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy and Water Management Awards recognize individuals, groups, and agencies for their outstanding contributions in the areas of energy efficiency, water conservation, and the use of advanced and renewable energy technologies at federal facilities.

375

2008 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy and Water Management Awards recognize individuals, groups, and agencies for their outstanding contributions in the areas of energy efficiency, water conservation, and the use of advanced and renewable energy technologies at federal facilities.

376

2009 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy and Water Management Awards recognize individuals, groups, and agencies for their outstanding contributions in the areas of energy efficiency, water conservation, and the use of advanced and renewable energy technologies at federal facilities.

377

2007 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy and Water Management Awards recognize individuals, groups, and agencies for their outstanding contributions in the areas of energy efficiency, water conservation, and the use of advanced and renewable energy technologies at federal facilities.

378

2013 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners Video  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy and Water Management Awards recognize individuals, groups, and agencies for the outstanding use of energy- and water-efficiency technologies at Federal facilities. This video honors the 25 individuals and teams that received awards in 2013.

379

Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Welcome to the eighth issue of Federal Energy-Efficient Product Procurement! This bi-monthly update helps Federal procurement officials, facility managers, and others remain up to date on events,...

380

2006 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy and Water Management Awards recognize individuals, groups, and agencies for their outstanding contributions in the areas of energy efficiency, water conservation, and the use of advanced and renewable energy technologies at federal facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Industrial Facilities | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Industrial Facilities Industrial Facilities Industrial Facilities October 8, 2013 - 10:14am Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) encourages Federal agencies requiring assistance with implementing energy-efficiency measures in their industrial facilities to hire a U.S. Department of Energy Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) for assessment services. The following resources can be used to plan and implement industrial facility energy-efficiency projects. Technical Publications: The Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO) website offers fact sheets, handbooks, and self-assessment manuals covering steam system efficiency, fundamentals of compressed air systems, motor systems management, and other topics. Tools: The AMO website offers valuable software tools for evaluating

382

Federal Railroad Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE TRANSPORTATION EXTERNAL WORKING GROUP MEETING Pueblo, CO. September 20, 2005 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials/Hazardous Materials Specialist Federal Railroad Administration - HQ Hazmat Division, Washington, DC. Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study - Report to Congress November 2003 - FRA' s Ofc. Of Research & Development (RDV), as lead on the Dedicated Train Study (DTS), received draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC), the contractor conducting the study. February, 2004 - FRA completed review of DFR and submitted editorial corrections back to VNTSC. Final draft of the DTS with editorial corrections received from VNTSC in February, 2004. March to September 2004 -

383

Planning and Reporting for Operations and Maintenance in Federal...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

contracts (ESPCs). planningomespcs.pdf More Documents & Publications Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects Introduction to Measurement &...

384

CRAD, Quality Assurance - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TA 55 SST TA 55 SST Facility CRAD, Quality Assurance - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Quality Assurance Program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Quality Assurance - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility More Documents & Publications CRAD, Quality Assurance - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility CRAD, Management - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility

385

Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Areas » Sustainable Buildings & Campuses » Federal Program Areas » Sustainable Buildings & Campuses » Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings October 4, 2013 - 4:42pm Addthis Federal agencies have to meet laws and regulations, which set energy management and efficiency requirements for Federal buildings, including reducing energy consumption and increasing the use of renewable energy. Learn about Federal sustainability requirements for buildings and facilities by: Law and regulation Topic. Also learn more about the Guiding Principles for Federal Leadership in High-Performance and Sustainable Buildings. Reporting Federal legislation requires agencies to annually report on facility energy consumption and management. For more information, see Federal Facility

386

Federal Energy Management Program: Metering  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Metering Metering Historically, the Federal sector has lagged in metering applications. It is not uncommon to find one meter serving hundreds of Federal facilities. These master meters make it very difficult to manage energy use and are a primary driver for Federal metering requirements. To help Federal agencies meet these requirements, this section outlines strategies and resources surrounding metering best practices, including: Metering Systems: Overview of metering system capabilities and functionality as well as common components across various metering systems. Metering Approaches: Description of the four primary approaches to metering, including required equipment common for each approach. Metering Process: Outline of the five step process typically used to evaluate, design, install, and implement Federal metering programs.

387

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON EARLY COORDINATION OF FEDERAL AUTHORIZATIONS AND RELATED  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ON EARLY COORDINATION OF FEDERAL AUTHORIZATIONS AND RELATED ON EARLY COORDINATION OF FEDERAL AUTHORIZATIONS AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS REQUIRED IN ORDER TO SITE ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION FACILITIES August 8,2006 THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY THE COUNCIL on ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY THE ADVISORY COUNCIL on HISTORIC PRESERVATION I. PURPOSE With the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), the Department of Energy (DOE), the Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Department of Defense (DOD), the Department of the Interior POI), the Department of Commerce (DOC), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Council on Environmental Quality

388

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Federal - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -...

389

Federal Railroad Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Legislation Legislation Kevin R. Blackwell FRA Hazmat Division Washington, DC Federal Railroad Safety Accountability and Improvement Act of 2007 (FRSAIA)-H.R. 1516 /S. 918 DOT supports this reauthorization bill over H.R. 2095 The provisions of H.R. 2095, while not exactly the same, are very similar to this bill in regard to the core provisions Core provisions: Review and reform the Federal hours of service requirements Establish a new risk reduction program alongside the current existing safety program, and Mandate reporting by States and railroads to the DOT's National Crossing Inventory Federal Railroad Safety Improvement Act of 2007 (FRSIA) - H.R. 2095 Letter from DOT's General Counsel's office addressing DOT's

390

Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select DOE Facilities, April 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oversight Oversight Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration Nuclear Facilities May 2011 Late Fall 2012 April 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Overall Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 3

391

Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select DOE Facilities, April 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Oversight Oversight Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration Nuclear Facilities May 2011 Late Fall 2012 April 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Overall Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 3

392

Federal Energy Management Success Stories | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

(EERE) successes in cost-effective energy management and investment practices save money by saving energy within federal government facilities and fleets. Explore EERE's...

393

Energy Corridors on Federal Lands | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

transmission and distribution facilities on Federal lands in the 11 contiguous Western States (Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon,...

394

federal energy management prog | netl.doe.gov  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

in saving energy. Thanks in part to the technical assistance provided by FEMP, the energy intensity of Federal facilities has decreased by roughly 45% since 1975. FEMP also...

395

Federal Energy Management Program: FEMP Training Webcasts  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FEMP Training FEMP Training Webcasts to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: FEMP Training Webcasts on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: FEMP Training Webcasts on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: FEMP Training Webcasts on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: FEMP Training Webcasts on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: FEMP Training Webcasts on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: FEMP Training Webcasts on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject Requirements by Regulation Notices & Rules Guidance Facility Reporting Fleet Reporting FEMP Training Webcasts The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) will be developing new training webcasts for Federal building energy efficiency standards and life

396

Review of the Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Disposition Project, September 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facility Centered Assessment of the Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Disposition Project September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Results .................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 7

397

Review of the Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Disposition Project, September 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Centered Assessment of the Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Disposition Project September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Results .................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 7

398

The Third Omega Laser FaciLiTy Users'grOUp WOrkshOp LLE Review, Volume 128250  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of the National Users' Facility Organization, which in turn promotes science education and outreach throughout the breadth and excitement of HED science undertaken at the Omega Laser Facility. The next section 37 of the 57 contributed poster and oral presentations. The content of their presentations ranged

399

Better Buildings Federal Award | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Government's highest-performing buildings through a competition to reduce annual energy use intensity (Btu per square foot of facility space) on a year-over-year basis....

400

Better Buildings Federal Award 2012 Competition | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Federal Government's highest-performing buildings through a competition to reduce annual energy use intensity (Btu per square foot of facility space) on a year-over-year basis....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Better Buildings Federal Award 2013 Competition | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Government's highest-performing buildings through a competition to reduce annual energy use intensity (Btu per square foot of facility space) on a year-over-year basis....

402

Kaiser Engineers Hanford internal position paper -- Project W-236A, Multi-function Waste Tank Facility -- Peer reviews of selected activities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this paper is to develop and document a proposed position on the performance of independent peer reviews on selected design and analysis components of the Title 1 [Preliminary] and Title 2 [Final] design phases of the Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility [MWTF] project. An independent, third-party peer review is defined as a documented critical review of documents, data, designs, design inputs, tests, calculations, or related materials. The peer review should be conducted by persons independent of those who performed the work, but who are technically qualified to perform the original work. The peer review is used to assess the validity of assumptions and functional requirements, to assess the appropriateness and logic of selected methodologies and design inputs, and to verify calculations, analyses and computer software. The peer review can be conducted at the end of the design activity, at specific stages of the design process, or continuously and concurrently with the design activity. This latter method is often referred to as ``Continuous Peer Review.``

Stine, M.D. [Kaiser Engineers Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States)

1995-01-04T23:59:59.000Z

403

Facility Effluent Monitoring Plan for the Waste Receiving and Processing (WRAP) Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A facility effluent monitoring plan is required by the U.S. Department of Energy in Order 5400.1 for any operations that involve hazardous materials and radioactive substances that could impact employee public safety, or the environment. This facility effluent monitoring plan assesses effluent monitoring systems and evaluates whether these systems are adequate to ensure the public health and safety as specified in applicable federal, state, and local requirements. This facility effluent monitoring plan ensures long-range integrity of the effluent monitoring systems by requiring an update whenever a new process or operation introduces new hazardous materials or significant radioactive materials. This document must be reviewed annually even if there are no operational changes, and must be updated, as a minimum, every 3 years.

DAVIS, W.E.

2000-03-08T23:59:59.000Z

404

Strengthening Federal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Jan. 24 Jan. 24 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2007 Executive Order 13423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management January 24, 2007 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to strengthen the environmental, energy, and transpor- tation management of Federal agencies, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Policy. It is the policy of the United States that Federal agencies conduct their environmental, transportation, and en- ergy-related activities under the law in sup- port of their respective missions in an envi- ronmentally, economically and fiscally sound, integrated, continuously improving, efficient, and sustainable manner. Sec. 2. Goals for Agencies. In imple-

405

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

44 44 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 12, 1996 / Notices will be issued this fall in accordance with the reallocation procedures contained in the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). Under section 442(e) of the HEA, unexpended FWS funds returned to the Secretary must be reallocated to eligible institutions that used at least 10 percent of the total FWS Federal funds granted to the institution to compensate students employed in community services. Because reallocated FWS funds will be distributed on the basis of fair share shortfall criteria, institutions must also have a fair share shortfall to receive these funds. Institutions must use all the reallocated FWS Federal funds to compensate students employed in community services. To ensure

406

Federal Technical Capability Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Technical Capability Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Home About the FTCP FTCP Topics FTCP Meetings Performance Indicator Reports Guiding Documents Qualifying Official Training Approaches FTCP Plans, Reports & Issue Papers Workforce Analysis & Staffing Site Specific Information Nuclear Executive Leadership Training General Information 2004-1 FTCP Commitments FTCP Correspondence Site Map Contact Us Quick Reference Departmental Representative to the DNFSB Facility Representative Safety System Oversight DOE Integrated Safety Management National Training Center DOE Directives Program DOE Technical Standards Program DOE Phone Book HSS Logo FTCP FTCP Topics DOE Strategic Human Capital Plan (FY 2006 - 2011) New Directions in Learning: Building a DOE University System May 4, 2007, the Deputy Secretary memorandum designating Karen Boardman the FTCP Chairperson.

407

Federal Correctional Institution- Phoenix, Arizona  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A parabolic-trough solar water-heating system was installed at the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) facility north of Phoenix, Arizona. This medium security prison for males has a current population of about 1,200 inmates and uses an average of 50,000 gallons of hot water per day for kitchen, shower, laundry, and sanitation needs.

408

Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (LBL Facilities), April 23, 2013 (HSS CRAD 45-58, Rev. 0)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of U.S. Department of Energy Subject: Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immob ilization Plant (LBL Facilities) - C riteria and Review Approach D oc um~ HS: HSS CRAD 45-58 Rev: 0 Eff. Date: April 23, 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Acting Di rec or, Office of Safety and Emergency Nltanagement Evaluations Date: Apri l 23 , 20 13 Criteria and Review Approach Document ~~ trd,James Low Date: April 23 , 20 13 1.0 PURPOSE Within the Office of H.ealth, Safety and Security (HSS), the Office of Enforcement and Overs ight, Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) miss io n is to assess the effectiveness of the environment, safety, health, and emergency management systems and practices used by line and

409

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

410

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

411

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Operations and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance The following laws and regulations set advanced metering and measurement requirements for Federal agencies. Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005: Requires all Federal buildings to be metered by October 1, 2012, to ensure efficient energy use and reduce the cost of electricity used in Federal facilities. Advanced meters or metering devices must provide data at least daily and measure the consumption of electricity at least hourly. These devices must be used to the maximum extent practical. Requires Federal agencies to submit to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) an implementation plan identifying personnel responsible for achieving metering requirements, and any determination by the agency that advanced meters or metering systems are not practical in their specific situation.

412

Regulatory Facility Guide for Tennessee  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This guide provides detailed compilations of international, federal, and state transportation related regulations applicable to shipments originating at or destined to Tennessee facilities. Information on preferred routes is also given.

Anderson, S.S.; Bock, R.E.; Francis, M.W.; Gove, R.M.; Johnson, P.E.; Kovac, F.M.; Mynatt, J.O. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Rymer, A.C. [Transportation Consulting Services, Knoxville, TN (United States)

1994-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

413

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Water Efficiency Best Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Water Efficiency Best Management Practices Water Efficiency Best Management Practices Water Sense at Work Logo for the EPA WaterSense The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency developed WaterSense at Work, a compilation of water-efficiency best management practices (BMPs), to help commercial and institutional facilities understand and manage water use, help facilities establish effective water-management programs, and identify projects and practices that reduce facility water use. FEMP originally developed Federal Water Efficiency Best Management Practices (BMPs) in response to Executive Order (E.O.) 13123 requirements, which required Federal agencies to reduce water use through cost-effective water efficiency improvements. E.O. 13423 supersedes E.O. 13123. To account for the superseded requirement changes, water use patterns, and advancing technologies, the Environmental Protection Agency's WaterSense Office updated the original BMPs.

414

HUD's Environmental Review Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An environmental review is the process of reviewing a project and its potential environmental impacts to determine whether it meets federal, state, and local environmental standards. The...

415

The Russian Federation's Ministry of Atomic Energy: Programs and Developments  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Ministry of Atomic Energy of the Russian Federation (Minatom) is one of Russia's largest and most influential federal bodies. Throughout 1999 its head, Yevgeny Adamov, has worked to increase the Ministry's commercial competitiveness by consolidating redundant facilities and tightening control over subsidiary organizations. Economic difficulties and budget constraints, however, have hindered Minatom's ability to achieve many of its programs and goals. As a result, the Ministry has continued, renewed or initiated contracts with several countries possessing questionable commitments to nonproliferation and has sought to expand its role in international nuclear waste management and spent fuel reprocessing in order to raise new sources of revenue. While many of these programs are not likely to come to fruition, others raise significant nonproliferation and environmental concerns. This paper reviews select programs driving Minatom's efforts to raise funds, comments on their potential viability, and highlights areas likely to be of particular concern for the United States over the next three to five years.

Johnson, Craig M.

2000-07-24T23:59:59.000Z

416

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1950 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS R. E. BEARD Statistics...Price 20s. [453 ] REVIEWS Statistics, Volume I...regard to the mathematical standard required by the Institute...distributions.' The general plan of the book is first......

R. E. BEARD

1950-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

417

Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Vision For DOE to be a technically proficient enterprise, with federal technical personnel overseeing Defense Nuclear Facilities in a manner that enables and enhances the DOE mission in a technically defensible fashion, while being recognized as preeminent in federal technical leadership and competency. Missions and Functions The Department of Energy is committed to developing and maintaining a technically competent workforce to accomplish its missions in a safe and efficient manner. The Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) provides for the recruitment, deployment, development, and retention of Federal personnel with the demonstrated technical capability to safely

418

Federal Energy Management Program: Laws and Regulations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Laws and Laws and Regulations to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Laws and Regulations on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Laws and Regulations on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Laws and Regulations on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Laws and Regulations on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Laws and Regulations on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Laws and Regulations on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject Requirements by Regulation Notices & Rules Guidance Facility Reporting Fleet Reporting Laws and Regulations EISA 432 Compliance Tracking Track Federal agency progress toward Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 using FEMP's EISA 432 Compliance Tracking

419

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Guidance Guidance The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides guidance on Federal laws and regulations related to energy management. General Guidance for Facilities Overview of Federal Energy Management Policy and Mandates: Guidance document outlining Federal energy management goals and requirements for Federal energy managers. Sustainability Requirement Crosswalk: Crosswalk of sustainability and energy goals and targets within executive orders and other statutes. Guidelines Establishing Criteria for Excluding Buildings from the Energy Performance Requirements of Section 543 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act as Amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005): Guidelines that established criteria for exclusions from the energy performance requirement for a fiscal year or any Federal building or collection of Federal buildings within the statutory framework provided by the law.

420

Federal Energy Management Program: Notices and Rules  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Notices and Rules Notices and Rules to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Notices and Rules on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Notices and Rules on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Notices and Rules on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Notices and Rules on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Notices and Rules on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Notices and Rules on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject Requirements by Regulation Notices & Rules Guidance Facility Reporting Fleet Reporting Notices and Rules The following notices, rulemakings, and guidelines were announced through the Federal Register as defined by the Administration Procedure Act and the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Supplemental Figures and Tables for Groundfish EFH Review Phase 1 Report "Federal and State Marine Protected Areas Type of Fishing Restriction"  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

"Federal and State Marine Protected Areas ­ Type of Fishing Restriction" Author and state MPAs depicted in map figures, categorized by level of fishing restriction Fishing Restriction BEFORE AFTER Commercial and Recreational Fishing Prohibited

Goldfinger, Chris

422

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25 25 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 1997 / Notices implementation from 8:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. For the rest of the day, the Council will meet with representatives from the State School-to-Work Implementation Grantees in small groups to discuss and determine strategies for addressing State sustainability issues. The meeting will close with a summary of the day's meeting and a discussion of future actions. Public Participation: The meeting on Tuesday, December 2, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Renaissance Mayflower Hotel, will be open to the public. Seats will be reserved for the media. Individuals with disabilities in need of special accommodations should contact the Designated Federal Official (DFO), listed below, at least seven (7)

423

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 47 / Friday, March 8, 1996 / Notices Comment date: March 18, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 13. Benjamin F. Montoya [Docket No. ID-2945-000] Take notice that on February 23, 1996, Benjamin F. Montoya (Applicant) tendered for filing an application under Section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act to hold the following positions: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Public Service Company of New Mexico, a New Mexico corporation Director, Northwest Corporation Comment date: March 15, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 14. Montana Power Company [Docket No. TX96-6-000] Take notice that on February 26, 1996, Montana Power Company (MPC) tendered for filing an application

424

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

August/September 2005 August/September 2005 Report Period: July 1- September 30, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The draft-final Monticello Long-Term Surveillance and Afaintenance Operating Procedures for Swface and Ground Water (Volume III) and draft-final Annual Data Summmy Report for Operable Unit Ill of the Monticello Mill Tailings Site, October 2004 through April 2005 were completed. MRAP The annual inspection of the Monticello Mill Tailings Site and the Monticello Vicinity Properties was conducted on September 14 and 15. Several high priority repair items (see page 3 of this report) were identified during the inspection and were repaired by September 30, 2005. MVP No significant activities to report. FFA Monthly Report July- September 2005

425

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

September/October 2004 September/October 2004 Report Period: September 1- October 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS With the completion of all remedial action reports, installation of monitoring wells in accordance with the Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan, and an onsite inspection by EPA and UDEQ, EPA was able tci write and sign the Preliminmy Closeout Report for the Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS), Operable Units I, II, and III. With EPA's signature on this document (September 29, 2004), the MMTS was designated as "construction complete." MRAP The annual inspection oftheMMTS was conducted September 15-17,2004. With the exception of property now owned by the City of Monticello, the site is in good condition. Restoration and maintenance issues continue to exist on City owned property. DOE continues

426

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

August 2004 August 2004 Report Period: July 1- August 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS Two monitoring wells were installed, which completed the monitoring network for OU III. The following documents have been completed: * · Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III Post-Record of Decision Monitoring Plan * Remedial Action/Remedial Design Workplan for the Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III MRAP DOE is continuing discussions with the City of Monticello concerning adequate restoration of the former millsite. On July 27, the DOE Contracting Officer wrote a letter insisting that the City of Monticello explain its plans to remedy the failure of the restoration of the Monticello Millsite as required under a Cooperative Agreement between the City and DOE.

427

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

May/June 2004 May/June 2004 Report Period: May 1- June 30, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Record of Decision for the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) Site Operable Unit IlL Swface Water and Ground Water, Monticello, Utah, was signed by DOE, UDEQ, and EPA. The last signature was obtained on June 2, 2004, seven days before the scheduled completion date. Monitored Natnral Attenuation is the selected remedy. MRAP The water level in the Pond 4 Leak Detection System is monitored daily; the level is static and pumping is no longer necessary. MVP Approximately 40 cubic yards of bricks and mortar were removed by the owner from the Park Plaza Apartments (MS-00057) and placed near a city utility excavation. The bricks and mortar exceed the soil standard of 5 pCi/g Ra-226 above background and were

428

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

January/February 2005 January/February 2005 Report Period: January 1 -February 28, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), and U.S. Department ofEnergy (DOE) agreed that the Monticello Administrative Manual and Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Operating Procedures will not be combined into a single manual. Instead, the Monticello LTSM Operating Procedures for Swface and Ground Water will be written to address Operable Unit III requirements. A draft of this manual will be delivered to EPA and UDEQ by April14, 2005, and a draft-final version will be completed by August 12, 2005. A Program Directive for conducting wildlife surveys at the Monticello wetland areas has been

429

Brookhaven National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement, February...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

to begin. It shall also include a date for submittal of a Completion Report for each AOC for which DOE believes that response action previously taken is adequate and that no...

430

MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT Report...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

leak detection system (LDS). Contractor L TSM personnel are inspecting associated pumps and controls to investigate this anomalous occurrence. MVP No significant activities...

431

Thermal Energy Storage at a Federal Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Utility partnership upgrades energy system to help meet the General Services Administration's (GSA) energy-saving goals

Not Available

2000-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

Assisting Federal Facilities with Energy Conservation Technologies...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

(Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas): This 13.7 megawatt (MW) combined heat and power (CHP) system at the center is expected to net more than 29 million in...

433

Carbon Fiber Technology Facility | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Carbon Fiber Technology Facility Carbon Fiber Technology Facility 2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

434

Carbon Fiber Technology Facility | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Carbon Fiber Technology Facility Carbon Fiber Technology Facility 2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

435

Carbon Fiber Technology Facility | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Carbon Fiber Technology Facility Carbon Fiber Technology Facility 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

436

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

7, Surveys and Reviews 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7,...

437

Better Buildings Workforce Guidelines for Facility Energy Manager...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Guidelines for Facility Energy Manager - 2014 BTO Peer Review Better Buildings Workforce Guidelines for Facility Energy Manager - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Phil Coleman,...

438

Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Fleets Federal Fleets The Federal Fleet Program Overview outlines FEMP services and assistance available to Federal fleet managers to increase the use of alternative fuels and advanced vehicles. FEMP's Sustainable Federal Fleets website provides guidance and assistance to help implement Federal legislative and regulatory requirements mandating reduced petroleum consumption and increased alternative fuel use. FEMP's efforts include assisting agencies with implementing and managing energy-efficient and alternative fuel vehicles and facilitating a coordinated effort to reduce petroleum consumption and increase alternative fuel use annually. Content on Sustainable Federal Fleets spans Federal requirements and reporting compliance, alternative fuels and advanced vehicles, fleet performance data, analysis services, information resources, and FEMP contacts.

439

Federated Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wind Farm Wind Farm Jump to: navigation, search Name Federated Wind Farm Facility Federated Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Federated Developer Federated Location MN Coordinates 46.729553°, -94.6858998° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.729553,"lon":-94.6858998,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

440

Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency Basics  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Basics Basics Graphic of the eTraining logo Training Available Managing Water Assessment in Federal Facilities: Learn how to manage the Water Assessment process in Federal facilities by taking this FEMP eTraining course. Although two-thirds of the Earth's surface is water, less than one-half of one percent of that water is currently available for our use. As the U.S. population increases, so does our water use, making water resources increasingly scarce. Many regions feel the strain. The Federal Government uses an estimated 148 to 165 billion gallons of potable water annually. This is equal to the annual water use of a state the size of New Jersey or almost 8 million people1. This is, in part, because water requires significant energy input for treatment, pumping, heating, and process uses. Water is integral to the cooling of power plants that provide energy to Federal facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

72 Los Alamos Science Number 24 1996 Russian Federation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Federation Ronald H. Augustson and John R. Phillips as told to Debra A. Daugherty Russian-American MPC&A #1272 Los Alamos Science Number 24 1996 Russian Federation Sverdlovsk-44 St. Petersburg Arzamas-16-to-Government Government-to-Government Figure 1. The map of the Russian Feder- ation below shows the nuclear facilities

442

2011 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy and Water Management Awards recognize individuals, groups, and agencies for their outstanding contributions in the areas of energy efficiency, water conservation, and the use of advanced and renewable energy technologies at federal facilities. Winners of the 2011 Federal Energy and Water Management Awards include:

443

Better Buildings Federal Award 2013 Guidelines for Entering  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Better Buildings Federal Award recognizes the Federal Government's highest-performing buildings through a competition to reduce annual energy intensity (Btu per square foot of facility space) on a year-over-year basis. The winner is the Federal building that reduces its energy intensity the most as compared to the previous year.

444

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Multiple laws and executive orders define requirements for the use of renewable energy in Federal facilities. The Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005: Defines "renewable energy" as electric energy generated from solar, wind, biomass, landfill gas, ocean (including tidal, wave, current, and thermal), geothermal, municipal solid waste, or new hydroelectric generation capacity achieved from increased efficiency or additions of new capacity at an existing hydroelectric project Requires the Secretary of Energy to ensure that, to the extent economically feasible and technically practicable, the following amounts of the total electricity consumed by the Federal government come from renewable energy: Not less than 3% in fiscal years 2007-2009

445

Federal Energy Management Program | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Energy Management Program Federal Energy Management Program ESPC ENABLE Program Expanded ESPC ENABLE now includes two new solar photovoltaic and HVAC system replacement energy conservation measures. Read more New Online Course on Advanced UESCs Learn best practices for streamlining major utility energy service contract (UESC) tasks to meet site goals for energy and water efficiency, renewable power generation, and demand reduction. Read more Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners FEMP honors individuals, groups, and programs for their outstanding use of energy- and water-efficiency technologies at Federal facilities. Read more Featured Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance Agencies are required to report annual progress made toward energy- and water-reduction goals.

446

Astronomy Grant Round 2011 Between May and September 2010, STFC reviewed its mechanisms for funding the exploitation of facilities and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Astronomy Grant Round ­ 2011 Between May and September 2010, STFC reviewed its mechanisms). The Review Panel recommended that existing standard and rolling grant mechanisms be replaced by a single consolidated grant scheme containing core and non-core staff post funding. Although STFC has accepted

Crowther, Paul

447

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Fire Suppression Vital Safety System, January 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

the the Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Fire Suppression Vital Safety System January 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1

448

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Fire Suppression Vital Safety System, January 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the the Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Fire Suppression Vital Safety System January 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1

449

Independent Oversight Review of the Savannah River Field Office Tritium Facilities Radiological Controls Activity-Level Implementation, November 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of the of the Savannah River Field Office Tritium Facilities Radiological Controls Activity-Level Implementation May 2011 November 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Scope................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 1

450

Review of K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility Found Fuel Multi-Canister Overpack Operatioons, August 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility Found Fuel Multi-Canister Overpack Operations May 2011 August 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

451

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility Fire Suppression System, January 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Waste Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility Fire Suppression System January 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1

452

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility Fire Suppression System, January 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waste Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility Fire Suppression System January 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1

453

Review of the Savannah River Site, Salt Waste Processing Facility, Construction Quality of Piping and Pipe Supports, September 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Savannah River Site, Salt Waste Processing Savannah River Site, Salt Waste Processing Facility, Construction Quality of Piping & Pipe Supports September 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1

454

Review of the Savannah River Site, Salt Waste Processing Facility, Construction Quality of Piping and Pipe Supports, September 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Site, Salt Waste Processing Savannah River Site, Salt Waste Processing Facility, Construction Quality of Piping & Pipe Supports September 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1

455

Review of K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility Found Fuel Multi-Canister Overpack Operatioons, August 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility Found Fuel Multi-Canister Overpack Operations May 2011 August 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

456

Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

G 226.1-2, Federal Line Management Oversight of DOE Nuclear Facilities G 226.1-2, Federal Line Management Oversight of DOE Nuclear Facilities Enforcement and Oversight HSS Home Contact Us Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities Purpose This Guide provides U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) line management organizations with guidance that may be useful to them in effectively and efficiently implementing the requirements of DOE O 226.1B, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy, dated April 25, 2011, as applied to Federal line management of hazard category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities. Policy - P 226.1B, Department of Energy Oversight Policy Order - O 226.1B, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy Guide - G 226.1-2, Federal Line Management Oversight of DOE Nuclear Facilities

457

Federal Railroad Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Update Du Update Du Jour Department Of Energy Transportation External Coordination Working Group Meeting Albuquerque, New Mexico April 21-23, 2004 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials Program Manager Federal Railroad Administration Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study- Report to Congress FRA' s Research & Development Office (as lead on the study) received a draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC) in late November, 2003. Editorial corrections were made and a final draft dated February, 2004 was provided to FRA. Final Draft Report FRA has been reviewed and been sent to FRA Administrator for clearance and forwarding to DOT OST. FRA has already "Officially Coordinated" and briefed DOT OST and

458

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

893 893 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2003 / Notices Title: Comprehensive Program Annual Performance Report. Frequency: One time. Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 140. Burden Hours: 2,800. Abstract: The Comprehensive Program is a discretionary grant program that makes competitive awards to support reform and innovations through projects that improve educational practice at the postsecondary level. Grantees annually submit a performance report to demonstrate that substantial progress is being made toward meeting the objectives of their projects. Reporting requirements are currently based on broad criteria from the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR). This request is to

459

Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Safety Basis and Design Development, August 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Site Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Safety Basis and Design Development May 2011 August 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose.................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Scope and Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 3

460

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1959 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS E. S. PEARSON The Advanced...433 . 84s. [491 ] REVIEWS The Advanced Theory of...the same comprehensive standard, three volumes will...inserted in the original plan at this half-way stage......

E. S. PEARSON

1959-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......book-review Reviews Reviews Factors for One-sided...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...Pp. 412 . 5.00. Reviews 293 Handbook of Nonparametric...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...expected value ft and standard deviation cr/^/n......

Reviews

1964-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

Federal Energy Management Program: Guiding Principles for Federal  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Guiding Principles for Federal Leadership in High-Performance and Sustainable Buildings Guiding Principles for Federal Leadership in High-Performance and Sustainable Buildings FEMP provides guidance and assistance for compliance with the guiding principles established by the 2006 Federal Leadership in High-Performance and Sustainable Buildings Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), which became mandatory through Executive Order (E.O.) 13423 and reinforced in E.O. 13514. The common set of guiding principles include those for: Integrated design Energy performance Water conservation Materials to help: Reduce the total ownership cost of facilities Improve energy efficiency and water conservation Provide safe, healthy, and productive building environments Promote sustainable environmental stewardship. See the Interagency Sustainability Working Group's 2008 High-Performance and Sustainable Buildings Guidance.

463

Quality Managment Program (QMP) report: A review of quality management programs developed in response to Title 10, Section 35.32 of the Code of Federal Regulations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In July of 1991, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission published a Final Rule in the Federal Register amending regulations governing medical therapeutic administrations of byproduct material and certain uses of radioactive sodium iodide. These amendments required implementation of a Quality Management Program (QMP) to provide high confidence that the byproduct material -- or radiation from byproduct material -- will be administered as directed by an authorized user physician. Herein, this rule is referred to as the QM rule. The Final Rule was published after two proposed rules had been published in the Federal Register.

Witte, M.C.

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Regulatory facility guide for Ohio  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Regulatory Facility Guide (RFG) has been developed for the DOE and contractor facilities located in the state of Ohio. It provides detailed compilations of international, federal, and state transportation-related regulations applicable to shipments originating at destined to Ohio facilities. This RFG was developed as an additional resource tool for use both by traffic managers who must ensure that transportation operations are in full compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements and by oversight personnel who must verify compliance activities.

Anderson, S.S.; Bock, R.E.; Francis, M.W.; Gove, R.M.; Johnson, P.E.; Kovac, F.M.; Mynatt, J.O. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Rymer, A.C. [Transportation Consulting Services, Knoxville, TN (United States)

1994-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

465

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2005 Annual Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capability Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Annual Plan January 15, 2005 FTCP Annual Plan, FY 2005 INTRODUCTION The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program (Program) is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the U.S. Department of Energy (also known as the "Department" or DOE) missions and responsibilities. The current Program was formalized in 1998 through Department directives DOE Policy 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Program for Defense Nuclear Facilities, and DOE Manual (M) 426.1-1A, Federal Technical Capability Manual. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) provides leadership in implementing the

466

ARM - Facility News Article  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4, 2013 [Facility News] 4, 2013 [Facility News] Work Cut Out for ARM Science Board Bookmark and Share With a new fixed site on the horizon in the Azores, a third ARM Mobile Facility gearing up for action in the Arctic, and more aircraft probes and sensors than scientists can shake a stick at, the ARM Facility continues to expand its considerable suite of assets for conducting climate research. Along with this impressive inventory comes the responsibility to ensure the Facility is supporting the highest-value science possible. Enter the ARM Science Board. This eleven-member group annually reviews complex proposals for use of the ARM mobile and aerial facilities. To maintain excellence and integrity in the review process, each member serves a renewable term of two years, with membership updated annually.

467

FEMP: Labs, Data Centers, and High Tech Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentationgiven at the April 2012 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meetingdiscusses energy efficiency opportunities in data centers and laboratories as part of the Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP's) High-Tech Facilities initiative.

468

Federal Energy Management Program: Publications  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Advanced Search Browse by Topic Mail Requests Help Software FAQs Feature featured product thumbnail Federal Energy Management Program Overview - Facilitating Sound, Cost-Effective Energy Management Details Bookmark & Share View Related Welcome to the Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) publication and product library. Use this database to: Search for FEMP publications and products View or download publications Request hard copies of select publications and products. Search the Library Search (Searches Title, Description, Filename and Keywords) Advanced Search Browse by Topic Most Popular Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) ENABLE Program The Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) ENABLE program, a new project funding approach, allows small Federal facilities to realize energy and water savings in six months or less. ESPC ENABLE pr Details Bookmark & Share

469

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21 21 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2001 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Energy Technology Laboratory; Notice of Availability of a Financial Assistance Solicitation AGENCY: National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Notice of availability of a financial assistance solicitation. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the intent to issue Financial Assistance Solicitation No. DE-PS26-02NT41423 entitled ''Black Liquor/Biomass Gasification Technology Support Research and Development.'' It is the intent of the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), on behalf of the Office of Industrial Technologies (OIT) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, to solicit the submission of

470

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2003 / Notices 1 Because the plants' refueling schedules determine the availability for lead assembly use, Duke Power Company has submitted a license amendment request to the NRC to allow irradiation of MOX lead assemblies at Catawba. The SA also analyzes the use of the McGuire Nuclear Station (McGuire) in North Carolina, which could be used in lieu of Catawba, if a license amendment request were submitted and approved. SUMMARY: The Leader, Regulatory Information Management Group, Office of the Chief Information Officer, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before January

471

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

57 57 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices shall include a detailed explanation of the dispute. Upon the other Manager's receipt of such notice, that Manager shall have 15 working days to provide to the disputing Party a written answer to the notice and explanation. The notice and answer, including any exhibits thereto, shall be the Record of Dispute. After such 15-day period has expired, the Managers shall make their best efforts to resolve the dispute within 20 working days. C. If the Managers do not resolve the dispute within 20 days, the dispute will be elevated to FWS's Regional Director and DOE's Rocky Flats Manager or successor. Within 30 working days of receiving the Record of Dispute, they shall confer and attempt to resolve the

472

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

13 13 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 223 / Friday, November 19, 1999 / Notices numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15. The EPA would like to solicit comments to: (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic,

473

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 16, 2004 / Notices meeting and will be provided opportunities to speak following previously scheduled speakers. Speakers will be requested to limit their initial comments to about five minutes. Speakers who need more than five minutes should indicate the length of time desired in their request. Depending on the number of speakers, DOE may need to limit speakers to five minutes initially but will provide additional opportunities as time permits. Speakers may also provide written materials to supplement their presentations. Oral and written comments will be given equal consideration. DOE will begin the meeting with an overview of the proposed Low-Emission Boiler System Project. The meeting will not be conducted as an evidentiary

474

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

139 139 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 23, 2004 / Notices EIS until March 31, 2004. Once scoping ended, BPA revised the Scoping Summary to reflect all comments received, and republished the summary on April 7, 2004. Based on the results of the public scoping conducted for the Transmission Policy-Level EIS and internal considerations such as the current and most recently projected activities of BPA's Transmission Business Line and budget issues, BPA has decided that continued consideration of a comprehensive policy for BPA's transmission business is not in the best interests of the agency at this time. As a result, it is no longer necessary to proceed with preparation of the Transmission Policy-Level EIS. Therefore, BPA is issuing this notice of

475

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

78 78 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Notices requirements and practices for institutions participating in the Title IV, Higher Education Act (HEA) programs. The public is alerted that this package is a request for an extension of a currently approved collection. Until the anticipated reauthorization of the Higher Education Act and any resulting changes to the implementing regulations, the existing paperwork collection is simply extended, rather than revised. Requests for copies of the proposed information collection request may be accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ''Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number 2853. When you access the information collection, click on ''Download Attachments'' to view.

476

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

04 04 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2002 / Notices Background The claim in question arose when the Department's Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education (Assistant Secretary) issued a program determination letter (PDL) on March 26, 1997. The PDL demanded a refund of $1,846,718 of funds provided to the PRDE for school years 1991-92 and 1992-93 under Chapter 1 of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. (1988)). Specifically, the Assistant Secretary found that the PRDE had used Chapter 1 funds to assess the educational needs of all public and private school children in violation of statutory and regulatory requirements that permitted the use of those funds only for programs designed to meet the

477

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

90 90 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 173 / Thursday, September 5, 1996 / Notices written comments concerning (1) the scope of the EIS, (2) the issues the EIS should address, and (3) the alternatives the EIS should analyze. Please address written comments to Mr. Grainger at the address indicated above. These comments should be postmarked by November 1, 1996 to ensure full consideration. Organizations and individuals wishing to participate in the public meeting can call 1-800-242-8269 between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, or submit their requests to Mr. Grainger at the address indicated above. DOE requests that anyone who wishes to speak at the scoping meeting preregister by contacting Mr. Grainger, either by phone or in writing. Preregistration

478

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2266 2266 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2001 / Notices The States eligible to apply for incentive grant awards, and the amount they are eligible to receive are Florida, $2,645,125; Indiana, $1,308,726; Kentucky, $1,400,631; Texas, $3,000,000; Utah, $882,167; and Vermont $843,351. The six eligible States must submit their applications for incentive funding to the Department of Labor by June 18, 2001. As set forth in the provisions of WIA section 503(b)(2), and 20 CFR 666.220(b), the application must include assurances that: A. The legislature of the State was consulted with respect to the development of the application. B. The application was approved by the Governor, the eligible agency for adult education (as defined in section 203 of WIA), and the State agency

479

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

07 07 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2004 / Notices assessment; and (f) environmental statistics. Process and Deadline for Submitting Nominations Any interested person or organization may nominate individuals qualified in the areas of expertise described above to serve on the Subcommittee. Nominations should be submitted in electronic format through the Form for Nominating Individuals to Panels of the EPA Science Advisory Board provided on the SAB Web site, http:// www.epa.gov/sab. The form can be accessed through a link on the blue navigational bar on the SAB Web site, http://www.epa.gov/sab. To be considered, all nominations must include the information required on that form. Anyone who is unable to submit nominations using this form, and any

480

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 17 / Thursday, January 25, 1996 / Notices Department of Energy Organization Act (Public Law 95-91), and rules and regulations issued in implementation of those Acts. Further information regarding this Advisory Board may be obtained from Rachel Murphy Samuel at (202) 586- 3279. Issued in Washington, DC, on January 18, 1996. JoAnne Whitman, Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 96-1197 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P Alternative Strategies for the Long- Term Management and Use of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride AGENCY: Department of Energy ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI). SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intent to prepare a programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility federal review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

REVIEW OF INDUSTRIES AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR TECHNOLOGIES APPLICABLE TO DEACTIVATION AND DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS FACILITIES  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Deactivation and Decommissioning Focus Area's (DDFA's) mission is to develop, demonstrate, and deploy improved deactivation and decommissioning (D&D) technologies. This mission requires that emphasis be continually placed on identifying technologies currently employed or under development in other nuclear as well as nonnuclear industries and government agencies. In support of DDFA efforts to clean up the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) radiologically contaminated surplus facilities using technologies that improve worker safety, reduce costs, and accelerate cleanup schedules, a study was conducted to identify innovative technologies developed for use in nonnuclear arenas that are appropriate for D&D applications.

Reilkoff, T. E.; Hetland, M. D.; O'Leary, E. M.

2002-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

482

PV opportunities in the Federal sector  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The Federal government is the largest user of energy in the United States today. The Department of Defense (DOD) uses more than 80% of that energy; the Department of Energy is the second largest user. In the 15 years from 1975 to 1989 $128 billion was spent for Federal energy activities. In 1989 alone the Federal government spent a total of $8.7 billion on energy of which $3.5 billion was for buildings and $2.4 billion was for electricity. The Federal government which owns or leases 500 000 buildings provided an additional $3.9 billion on energy assistance for low?income housing in 1989 (1). Executive Order 12902 (Energy Efficiency and Water Conservation at Federal Facilities) of March 8 1994 implements and expands the Federal energy management provisions stated in the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 1992. The goal is to reduce energy use in Federal buildings to 30% of the 1985 levels by the year 2005. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) has been assigned the responsibility of implementing Executive Order 12902. Subsequently DOE FEMP other Federal agencies and private industry have formed a unique partnership to develop a process and set of actions that will stimulate new opportunities for renewable energy technologies. If these Federal initiatives are successful substantial investment in renewable and energy efficiency technologies will be stimulated an important portion of the nations energy needs will be supplied and a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions will be achieved.

John P. Thornton

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

483

Proposed Rules Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18954 18954 Vol. 76, No. 66 Wednesday, April 6, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapters XXIII and XXIV 10 CFR Chapters II, III, and X 18 CFR Chapter I 41 CFR Chapter 109 48 CFR Chapter 9 Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information; extension of public comment period. SUMMARY: On February 3, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) published a request for information (RFI) issued as part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.'' This document announces that the period for submitting reply comments is extended to April 15, 2011. The February 3 document incorrectly published in the Notices section of the Federal Register.

484

Facilitating Sound, Cost-Effective Federal Energy Management (Fact Sheet), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

include energy savings performance include energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs), utility energy service contracts (UESCs), on-site renewable power purchase agreements (PPAs), and various Federal and state energy incen- tives programs. With assistance from FEMP, the Federal Government's energy management com- mitment has accelerated and grown in recent years. Since 2005, FEMP facili- tated $3.1 billion of efficiency invest- ments in Federal Government facilities from performance-based contracts, which resulted in cost savings of approximately $8.5 billion over the life of the energy- saving measures. Using sustainable design practices to create high-performance buildings: FEMP helps Federal agencies imple- ment sustainable design practices that

485

Federal Energy Management Program: Purchasing Renewable Power  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Purchasing Renewable Power Purchasing Renewable Power Federal agencies can purchase renewable power or renewable energy certificates (RECs) from a utility or other organization to meet Federal renewable energy requirements. Renewable power and RECs are good choices for facilities where on-site projects may be difficult or capital budgets are limited. There are three methods for purchasing renewable power that's not generated on a Federal site: Renewable Energy Certificates: Also known as renewable energy credits, green certificates, green tags, or tradable renewable certificates, RECs represent the environmental attributes of the power produced from renewable energy projects and are sold separately from commodity electricity. RECs are an attractive option for Federal facilities located where renewable power is not readily available.

486

Facilities Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Operations » Facilities Management Operations » Facilities Management Facilities Management INL is a multiprogram, federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) emphasizing applied engineering to provide solutions for use across the DOE complex, as well as regionally, nationally, and world wide. INL is a multiprogram, federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) emphasizing applied engineering to provide solutions for use across the DOE complex, as well as regionally, nationally, and world wide. Overview The Office of Facilities Management manages programs to maintain and deliver nuclear research facilities and capabilities at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) that are required to help meet the nation's strategic needs in energy and national security. It is part of the Department of

487

Suspect Counterfeit Items Criteria Review and Approach Document , Phase 1 - Management - Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Suspect/Counterfeit Items Suspect/Counterfeit Items Criteria Review and Approach Document (CRAD) NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division Phase 1 - Management Performance Objective: Management should have a formal system under Quality Assurance with adequate controls defined and implemented to identify and preclude Suspect/Counterfeit Items (S/CI) from being introduced into safety systems and applications that create potential hazards. CRITERIA: Management should have a formal system of controls in place for assurance that all items procured meet the requirements for their intended use. Management should have a system of mechanisms to continuously maintain current, accurate, updated information on SC/Is and associated suppliers using all available sources. Management should have a training program with detailed records that

488

Federal Technology Deployment Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technologies » Technology Deployment » Federal Technology Technologies » Technology Deployment » Federal Technology Deployment Working Group Federal Technology Deployment Working Group October 7, 2013 - 9:11am Addthis Energy Department Announces Interagency Committee to Increase Use of Clean Energy Technologies in Federal Facilities The Senior Executive Committee for Technology Deployment, a subcommittee of the Interagency Technology Deployment Working Group, brings together leaders of technology deployment programs from across the federal government to implement the Obama Administration's comprehensive strategy to reduce energy costs in agency facilities, while boosting American competitiveness in the global clean energy race. Learn more. The Federal Technology Deployment Working Group helps Federal agencies evaluate and deploy new and underutilized technologies.

489

Better Buildings Federal Award 2012 Competition | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Better Buildings Federal Award 2012 Competition Better Buildings Federal Award 2012 Competition Better Buildings Federal Award 2012 Competition October 24, 2013 - 1:51pm Addthis The Better Buildings Federal Award recognizes the Federal Government's highest-performing buildings through a competition to reduce annual energy use intensity (Btu per square foot of facility space) on a year-over-year basis. The Federal building that achieves the greatest percentage energy intensity savings for that year wins. 2012 Competition Thank you to all the participants of the 2012 Better Buildings Federal Award competition and congratulations to this year's winner, the U.S. Department of Interior's Brackish Groundwater National Desalination Research Facility! The building achieved an impressive 53.6% reduction in building energy intensity over its September 2011 baseline.

490

Federal Energy Management Program: Resources on Operations and Maintenance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance Graphic of the eTraining logo Training Available Advanced Electric Metering in Federal Facilities: Learn how to take full advantage of advanced electric metering systems by taking this FEMP eTraining course. Many helpful resources about operations and maintenance are available. Best Practices Operations and Maintenance Best Practices Guide: Outlines best practices to help Federal agencies implement effective O&M for systems and equipment found at their facilities. Federal Facilities Council: Website features events, reports, and links to National Academy websites. Commissioning Commissioning for Federal Facilities: Comprehensive information on ongoing commissioning processes to resolve operating problems, improve comfort, optimize energy use, and identify retrofits for commercial and institutional buildings and central plant facilities.

491

Solar Federal Roadmapping Meeting | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Roadmap Development Pgower's picture Submitted by Pgower(45) Member 7 August, 2014 - 13:14 One-day workshop to review solar federal roadmaps with agency and industry...

492

FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

March 2004 FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARD (FIPS) 199, STANDARDS FOR SECURITY Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology A new Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS), recently approved by the Secretary of Commerce, will help federal agencies

493

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2003 Annual Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2003 Annual Plan Washington, D.C. 20585 September 2002 FTCP FY 2003 Annual Action Plan INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) provides management direction to assist the Federal workforce in maintaining necessary technical competencies to safely operate its defense nuclear facilities. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (Panel) consists of senior technical safety managers representing nuclear facilities, and reports to the Deputy Secretary for workforce safety technical capabilities' matters. The Panel will continue to pursue progress in the following areas: 1. Continued development of senior management commitment and support for the technical intern

494

Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower/Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower/Resources Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower/Resources < Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower Jump to: navigation, search Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower Hydroelectric-collage2.jpg Home Federal Inland Hydropower Working Group Participating Agencies Resources MOU Related Resources Hydropower Resources Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities An Assessment of Energy Potential at Non-Powered Dams in the United States Assessment of Potential Capacity Increases at Existing Hydropower Plants Site Inventory and Hydropower Energy Assessment of Reclamation Owned Conduits Potential Hydroelectric Development at Existing Federal Facilities Advanced Conventional Hydropower Planning and Operation Analysis Tools The Integrated Basin-Scale Opportunity Assessment Initiative, FY

495

Buildings Energy Data Book: 4.1 Federal Buildings Energy Consumption  

Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

1 FY 2007 Federal Primary Energy Consumption (Quadrillion Btu) Buildings and Facilities 0.88 VehiclesEquipment 0.69 (mostly jet fuel and diesel) Total Federal Government...

496

Guide to Federal Financing for Energy Efficiency and Clean Energy Deployment  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Federal Finance Facilities Available for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Clean Energy Deployment is a resource guide that lists the various federal financing programs for which energy efficiency and clean energy qualify.

497

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility - January 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility -...

498

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Basics Federal Requirements By Regulation

499

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies

500

ARM - Facility News Article  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Review of ARM Infrastructure Completed Review of ARM Infrastructure Completed Bookmark and Share In May, the Department of Energy's Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) published findings and recommendations from their assessment of the effectiveness of ARM Climate Research Facility as a national scientific user facility. Based on a review of total user requests, the BERAC concluded that ARM was being effectively used by the broader scientific community, not just the ARM Program. They also stated that cost cutting measures had achieved the desired efficiency goals, but further cuts could impair the Facility's operations. The subcommittee reinforced the importance of the scientific impacts of this facility (including publications), and the value it has had for the international