National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for facility compliance agreement

  1. The Oak Ridge Reservation PCB Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement, October 28, 1996 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Compliance Agreement Between The United States Department of Energy and The United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 - Toxic Substances Control Act (Also Known As The Oak Ridge Reservation Polychlorinated Biphenyl Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (ORR-PCB-FFCA)) State Tennessee Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) TSCA Scope Summary Bring DOE's Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) into compliance with TSCA and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR Part 761,

  2. U.S. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement for the Hanford Site, February 7, 1994 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    for Radionuclide NESHAP State Washington Agreement Type Federal Facility Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) CAA Scope Summary Bring DOE's Hanford site into compliance with CAA Parties EPA; DOE; Richland Operations Office (RL) Date 02/07/1994 SCOPE * Bring DOE's Hanford site into compliance with CAA. This Compliance Plan contains a schedule for DOE to evaluate the monitoring systems associated with Designated Stacks to ensure that these systems conform to the standards for continuous monitoring

  3. Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement, February 20, 1992 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Toxic Substance Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (TSCA-UE- FFCA), February 20, 1992 State Kentucky Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) TSCA Scope Summary Establishes responsibilities and commitments for bringing DOE's former and active Uranium Enrichment Plants in Paducah, Portsmouth, and Oak Ridge into compliance with TSCA and PCB Regulations Parties DOE; U.S. EPA Date 2/20/1992 SCOPE * Establish a plan and the responsibilities and

  4. Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement, February 20, 1992 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Toxic Substance Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (TSCA-UE- FFCA), February 20, 1992 State Ohio Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) TSCA Scope Summary Establishes responsibilities and commitments for bringing DOE's former and active Uranium Enrichment Plants in Paducah, Portsmouth, and Oak Ridge into compliance with TSCA and PCB Regulations Parties DOE; U.S. EPA Date 2/20/1992 SCOPE * Establish a plan and the responsibilities and commitments

  5. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    specifications in 40 CFR 761.65(c)(6). ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Annually, starting six months after the effective date of this Agreement, DOE and the NNPP shall submit a...

  6. Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement, February 20, 1992

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Thomas L. McCall, Jr. http://www.em.doe.gov/ffaa/ortsca.html 4/25/2001 Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facilities Compliance Agree.. Page 12 of 26 Deputy Assistant Administrator for Federal Facilities Enforcement Office of Enforcement U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Michael F. Wood, Director Compliance Division Office of Compliance Monitoring Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances U.S. Environmental Protection Agency William H. Young Assistant Secretary for

  7. Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facility Compliance

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Agreement | Department of Energy Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facility Compliance Agreement Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facility Compliance Agreement Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Uranium Enrichment Federal Facility Compliance Agreement establishes a plan to bring DOE's Uranium Enrichment Plants (and support facilities) located in Portsmouth, Ohio and Paducah, Kentucky and DOE's former Uranium Enrichment Plant (and support

  8. Program management assessment of Federal Facility Compliance Agreement regarding CAA-40 C.F.R. Part 61, Subpart H at the Los Alamos National Laboratory

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-01-01

    An assessment of Los Alamos National Laboratory`s management system related to facility compliance with an element of the Clean Air Act was performed under contract by a team from Northern Arizona University. More specifically, a Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (FFCA) was established in 1996 to bring the Laboratory into compliance with emissions standards of radionuclides, commonly referred to as Rad/NESHAP. In the fall of 1996, the four-person team of experienced environmental managers evaluated the adequacy of relevant management systems to implement the FFCA provisions. The assessment process utilized multiple procedures including document review, personnel interviews and re-interviews, and facility observations. The management system assessment was completed with a meeting among team members, Laboratory officials and others on November 1, 1996 and preparation of an assessment report.

  9. Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order State Idaho Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Ensure that the environmental impacts...

  10. Monticello Mill site Federal Facility Agreement, December 22, 1988

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    : Monticello Vicinity Properties NPL Site and Monticello Millsite Federal Facility AgreemPage 1 of 36 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Monticello (Utah) Site: Monticello Vicinity Properties NPL Site and Monticello Millsite Federal Facility Agreement Pursuant to CERCLA Section 120, December 22, 1988 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VIII and THE STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY IN THE MATTER:

  11. Federal Facility Agreement progress report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-10-01

    The (SRS) Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) was made effective by the US. Environmental Protection Agency Region IV (EPA) on August 16, 1993. To meet the reporting requirements in Section XXV of the Agreement, the FFA Progress Report was developed. The FFA Progress Report is the first of a series of quarterly progress reports to be prepared by the SRS. As such this report describes the information and action taken to September 30, 1993 on the SRS units identified for investigation and remediation in the Agreement. This includes; rubble pits, runoff basins, retention basin, seepage basin, burning pits, H-Area Tank 16, and spill areas.

  12. Federal-facilities Hazardous-Waste Compliance Manual. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1990-01-09

    In the continuing effort to achieve a higher level of compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) at Federal facilities, the Federal Facilities Hazardous Waste Compliance Office (FFHWCO) has developed the Federal Facilities Hazardous Waste Compliance Manual. The manual includes an overview of the Federal-facilities hazardous-waste compliance program, relevant statutory authorities, model provisions for Federal facility agreements, enforcement and other applicable guidance, Federal facilities docket and NPL listings, data-management information, selected DOD and DOE program guidance, and organization charts and contacts. This compendium is intended to be used as a reference by Regional RCRA and CERCLA enforcement personnel and Regional Counsels, particularly as an orientation guide for new Federal facilities staff.

  13. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Compliance Order, February 24, 1997 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Compliance Order HWCA 96/97-5002 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 2/24/1997 SCOPE * Require compliance by the DOE

  14. Uranium Processing Facility Team Signs Partnering Agreement ...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Processing Facility ... Uranium Processing Facility Team Signs Partnering Agreement Posted: July 18, 2014 - 4:39pm Front row, left to right: Bill Priest, Consolidated Nuclear...

  15. Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, December 9, 1991

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Idaho National Engineering Laboratory ("INEL") Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, December 9, 1991 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Idaho National Engineering Laboratory ("INEL") Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, December 9, 1991 THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION 10, THE STATE OF IDAHO, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE, AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY IN THE MATTER OF: ) FEDERAL

  16. Weldon Spring Site Federal Facility Agreement

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Response to Comments September 26, 2006 Weldon Spring Site Federal Facility Agreement Page 1 of 8 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 7, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) entered into a new Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) for the DOE's Weldon Spring Site near St. Charles, Missouri. EPA made the FFA available for public comment for a period of thirty (30) days beginning April 19, 2006 and ending May 19, 2006. Comments

  17. Title Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Author

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ; '*'*' *'. *'' FFACO , Page 4 of 34 March 15, 1996 or streamlining of; duplicative or unnecessary procedures. II.:i.f. Satisfying the corrective action requirements of 40 CFR 264.101 .and Sections 3004(u) and 3004(v) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (42 U.S.C. §6924 (u) & (v)) and through incorporation by reference * . "/ into DOE's RCRA permit number NEV HW009. II.2. This Agreement Is .not intended to fulfill the Federal Facility Compliance Act requirement for a

  18. MRAP MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    MRAP MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT May/June 2005 Report Period: May 1 -June 30, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS DOE constmction, as identified in the Millsite Restoration Plan, was substantially completed on June 3. Seeding of disturbed areas was completed on June 15. MSG DOE completed constmction of the permeable reactive treatment cell and initiated operations in June. The cell is an enhancement to the existing pe1meable reactive ban*ier and was

  19. MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT Report Period: October 1- December 31, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Ray Plieness HIGHLIGHTS The Final Report-2005 Avian Wetland Surveys at the Monticello Mill Tailings Site and the Final Report-Monticello Mill Tailings Site Macroinvertebrate Sampling for 2005 were transmitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) on December 13. These reports are required under the Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable

  20. MSGOUID MONTICELLO PROJECTS *FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    MSGOUID MONTICELLO PROJECTS *FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT Report Period: Aprill -June 30, 2006 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS DOE submitted the draft Consolidated LTSM Administrative mid Operating Procedures Manual to EPA and UDEQ on May 4, 2006. Document transmittal met the stipulated penalty milestone of May 6, 2006. Semi-annual ground water and surface water monitoring was completed in May 2006 as scheduled. Three FY 2006 Program Directives were prepared and issued

  1. FERC Order No. 2003 Appendix 4 - Facilities Study Agreement ...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    4 - Facilities Study Agreement Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Form: FERC Order No. 2003 Appendix 4 - Facilities Study Agreement Abstract FERC...

  2. Waste Cleanup: Status and Implications of Compliance Agreements Between DOE and Its Regulators

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Jones, G. L.; Swick, W. R.; Perry, T. C.; Kintner-Meyer, N.K.; Abraham, C. R.; Pollack, I. M.

    2003-02-26

    This paper discusses compliance agreements that affect the Department of Energy's (DOE) cleanup program. Compliance agreements are legally enforceable documents between DOE and its regulators, specifying cleanup activities and milestones that DOE has agreed to achieve. Over the years, these compliance agreements have been used to implement much of the cleanup activity at DOE sites, which is carried our primarily under two federal laws - the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 0f 1976, as amended (RCRA). Our objectives were to determine the types of compliance agreements in effect at DOE cleanup sites, DOE's progress in achieving the milestones contained in the agreements, whether the agreements allowed DOE to prioritize work across sites according to relative risk, and possible implications the agreements have on DOE's efforts to improve the cleanup program.

  3. Case History of a Clean Water Act Compliance Agreement at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site near Golden, Colorado

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Thompson, J.S.

    1995-08-01

    A major Clean Water Act (CWA) Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement was signed on March 25, 1991 by the US Department of Energy, Rocky Flats Field Office (DOE, RFFO) and the Water Enforcement Division of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region VIII. The agreement revised the Rocky Flats Plant`s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and arose from pemittee-requested changes in effluent monitoring points and permit violations, most notably the February 22, 1989 Chromic Acid Incident. The Rocky Flats Plant, now called the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (Site) near Golden Colorado was operated at that time by Rockwell International Corporation, who later plead guilty to six misdemeanor and felony counts of the CWA (the aforementioned NPDES permit violations) and paid a $4 million fine on March 26, 1992. The Compliance Agreement, hereafter referred to as the NPDES FFCA, called for three separate remedial action plans and contained a schedule for their submittal to the EPA. The compliance plans focussed on: (1) Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) performance upgrades, (2) source control and surface water protection, and (3) characterization of the impacts from past sludge disposal practices. Projects that implemented the compliance plans were initiated soon after submittal to the EPA and are forecast to complete in 1997 at a total cost of over $35 million. This paper presents a case history of NPDES FFCA compliance projects and highlights the successes, failures, and lessons learned.

  4. Paducah Site Federal Facility Agreement | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Federal Facility Agreement Paducah Site Federal Facility Agreement The Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) governs the corrective action/response action process from site investigation through site remediation as agreed to by DOE, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Kentucky under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; Kentucky Revised Statute 224; and other laws and regulations identified in the FFA. PDF icon

  5. Weldon Spring Federal Facility Agreement, January 28, 1992 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Weldon Spring Site Agreement Name First Amended Federal Facility Agreement Cercla-VII-85- F-0057 State Missouri Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Identify and implement Operable Unit Remedial Action alternatives at the Weldon Spring Site Parties US EPA; US DOE Date 1/28/92 SCOPE * Investigate the environmental impacts of past and present activities at the Site on the public health, welfare and the environment. * Establish a procedural framework and

  6. Savannah River Site Federal Facility Agreement, January 15, 1993 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Site Agreement Name Savannah River Site Federal Facility Agreement Under Section 120 of CERCLA, January 15, 1993 State South Carolina Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Ensure that the environmental impacts associated with past and present activities at the Savannah River Site are thoroughly investigated and that appropriate response actions are taken to protect the public health, welfare, and the environment. Parties DOE; US EPA; South Carolina

  7. Monticello Mill site Federal Facility Agreement, December 22, 1988 Summary

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Monticello Agreement Name Monticello (Utah) Site: Monticello Vicinity Properties NPL Site and Monticello Millsite Federal Facility Agreement Pursuant to CERCLA Section 120, December 22, 1988 State Utah Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; US EPA; State of Utah Department of Environmental Health Date 12/22/1988

  8. Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facility...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facility Compliance Agreement Toxic Substances Control Act Uranium Enrichment Federal Facility Compliance Agreement Toxic...

  9. Argonne User Facility Agreements | Advanced Photon Source

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Materials (CNM), The Argonne Leadership Computing Facility (ALCF), The Argonne Tandem Linac Accelerator System (ATLAS), and The Intermediate Voltage Electron Microscopy...

  10. Mound Plant Federal Facility Agreement, July 15, 1993 Summary

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    United States Environmental Protection Agency Region V and the State of Ohio Federal Facility Agreement State Ohio Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary DOE shall identify Interim Remedial Actions (IRAs) alternatives and implement US EPA and OEPA approved remedies for the site in accordance with CERCLA Parties EPA; Ohio EPA (OEPA); DOE Date 07/15/1993 SCOPE * Identify Interim Remedial Action (IRA) alternatives which include Remedial Investigations (RI)

  11. Hanford/Tomsk reciprocal site visit: Plutonium agreement compliance talks

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Libby, R.A.; Sorenson, R.; Six, D.; Schiegel, S.C.

    1994-11-01

    The objective of the visit to Hanford Site was to: demonstrate equipment, technology, and methods for calculating Pu production, measuring integrated reactor power, and storing and safeguarding PuO{sub 2}; demonstrate the shutdown of Hanford production reactors; and foster openness and transparency of Hanford operations. The first day`s visit was an introduction to Hanford and a review of the history of the reactors. The second day consisted of discussions on the production reactors, reprocessing operations, and PuO{sub 2} storage. The group divided on the third day to tour facilities. Group A toured the N reactor, K-West reactor, K-West Basins, B reactor, and participated in a demonstration and discussion of reactor modeling computer codes. Group B toured the Hanford Pu Storage Facility, 200-East Area, N-cell (oxide loadout station), the Automated Storage Facility, and the Nondestructive Assay Measurement System. Group discussions were held during the last day of the visit, which included scheduling of a US visit to Russia.

  12. MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT Report Period: January 1-

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT Report Period: January 1- March 31, 2006 DOE Project Coordinator: Ray Plieness HIGHLIGHTS The Federal Facilities Agreement meeting was held February 21-22 in Salt Lake City, UT. Representatives from the U.S. Depattment of Energy (DOE), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), and the DOE contractor attended. The schedule of work through the end of the fiscal year was determined. MSG-OUIII The scope

  13. Federal Facilities Compliance Act, Conceptual Site Treatment Plan. Part 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1993-10-29

    This Conceptual Site Treatment Plan was prepared by Ames Laboratory to meet the requirements of the Federal Facilities Compliance Act. Topics discussed in this document include: general discussion of the plan, including the purpose and scope; technical aspects of preparing plans, including the rationale behind the treatability groupings and a discussion of characterization issues; treatment technology needs and treatment options for specific waste streams; low-level mixed waste options; TRU waste options; and future waste generation from restoration activities.

  14. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... U.S. EPA Region VI First Interstate Bank Tower at Fountain Place 1445 Ross Avenue 12th floor, Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75202-2733 Phone (214) 665-7579 8. Dave Phillippi http:...

  15. FEDERAL FACILITY COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT (FFCA) STACK ISOLATION PROJECT FUNCTIONS & REQUIREMENTS

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    TRANBARGER, R.K.

    2003-12-16

    This document delineates the functions and requirements for the FFCA Stack Isolation Project for the 244-A, 244-BX, 244-5, and 244-TX DCRTs. The isolation of each ventilation system and stack includes the electrical, instrumentation, and mechanical isolation of the ventilation system and the installation of primary and annulus breather filters to provide passive ventilation to meet the FFCA requirements.

  16. Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Regulatory Strategy

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Regulatory Strategy * Gather new data to enhance models developed for each of the five (5) historic underground nuclear test areas (repeat as necessary) * Review results: geology, hydrology, source term, groundwater and transport models, modeling approach (repeat as necessary) Investigation Stage Decision/Action Stage Closure Stage * Develop a model evaluation plan to challenge and refine model forecasts * Use model evaluation plan to identify

  17. Evaluation of the Cask Transportation Facility Modifications (CTFM) compliance to DOE order 6430.1A

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    ARD, K.E.

    1999-07-14

    This report was prepared to evaluate the compliance of Cask Transportation Facility Modifications (CTFM) to DOE Order 6430.1A.

  18. Fernald Triparty Agreement as revised, July 18, 1986 Summary

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Federal Facility Compliance Agreement State Ohio Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) RCRA/CERCLA/CWA Scope Summary Establish a Compliance Plan to ensure compliance by DOE with existing environmental statutes, and implementing regulations, including the Clean Air Act, RCRA, and CERCLA, at FMPC Parties DOE; US EPA Date 7/18/1986 SCOPE * Establish a Compliance Plan to ensure compliance by DOE with existing environmental statutes, and implementing regulations, including the Clean Air

  19. Weldon Spring Site Federal Facility Agreement UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Site Federal Facility Agreement UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VII UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE MATTER OF: The United States Department of Energy's Weldon Spring Site, St. Charles, Missouri Docket No. CERCLA-07-2006-0161 FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT FOR THE WELDON SPRING SITE Weldon Spring Site Federal Facility Agreement i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRELIMINARY

  20. Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility Complex Compliance Demonstration for DOE Order 435.1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Simonds, J.

    2007-11-06

    This compliance demonstration document provides an analysis of the Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility (ICDF) Complex compliance with DOE Order 435.1. The ICDF Complex includes the disposal facility (landfill), evaporation pond, administration facility, weigh scale, and various staging/storage areas. These facilities were designed and constructed to be compliant with DOE Order 435.1, Resource Conservation and Recovery act Subtitle C, and Toxic Substances Control Act polychlorinated biphenyl design and construction standards. The ICDF Complex is designated as the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) facility for the receipt, staging/storage, treatment, and disposal of INL Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) waste streams.

  1. Central Facilities Area Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lisa Harvego; Brion Bennett

    2011-11-01

    Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Central Facilities Area facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facilityspecific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool for developing the radioactive waste management basis.

  2. Mr. Todd Mullins Federal Facility Agreement Manager Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    JUN 1 1 2013 Mr. Todd Mullins Federal Facility Agreement Manager Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection Division of Waste Management 200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2 nd Floor Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Ms. Jennifer Tufts Federal Facility Agreement Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr. Mullins and Ms. Tufts: PPPO-02-1813000-13B TRANSMITTAL OF THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN UNDER THE FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT AT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

  3. Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility Complex Compliance Demonstration for DOE Order 435.1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    J. Simonds

    2006-09-01

    This compliance demonstration document provides an analysis of the Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility (ICDF) Complex compliance with DOE Order 435.1. The ICDF Complex includes the disposal facility (landfill), evaporation pond, admin facility, weigh scale, decon building, treatment systems, and various staging/storage areas. These facilities were designed and are being constructed to be compliant with DOE Order 435.1, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subtitle C, and Toxic Substances Control Act polychlorinated biphenyl design and construction standards. The ICDF Complex is designated as the central Idaho National Laboratory (INL) facilityyy for the receipt, staging/storage, treatment, and disposal of INL Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) waste streams. This compliance demonstration document discusses the conceptual site model for the ICDF Complex area. Within this conceptual site model, the selection of the area for the ICDF Complex is discussed. Also, the subsurface stratigraphy in the ICDF Complex area is discussed along with the existing contamination beneath the ICDF Complex area. The designs for the various ICDF Complex facilities are also included in this compliance demonstration document. These design discussions are a summary of the design as presented in the Remedial Design/Construction Work Plans for the ICDF landfill and evaporation pond and the Staging, Storage, Sizing, and Treatment Facility. Each of the major facilities or systems is described including the design criteria.

  4. Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) Signed at Oak Ridge

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Oak Ridge Reservation FFA was implemented on January 1, 1992. It is a CERCLA-required agreement among DOE, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation to promote cooperation and participation to clean and remediate the Oak Ridge Reservation.

  5. Uranium Processing Facility team signs partnering agreement | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration team signs partnering agreement | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery

  6. Title Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Author

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ..'** .'*'*,. '*'' * *.. *' ' ' ; '' * 9. * Il.i.b. Establishing specific sampling and monitoring 10 requirements, including drilling and subsurface sampling, 11 - ' * ' * designed to: ' * . ' , . * , . : . * 1 2 . ' * * ; * ' * ' ' ' * . . - * * . ' : . : * ' . . , - . * . - . . . . . . . _ . - * * * * ' * * * * ' - * * 13|... .Il.l.b.i, . ; Ensure the. health and safety,, at all 14 i . times, of NDEP personnel,, 'site, workers at. the 15 facilities, and any members of the public present at 16

  7. AGREEMENT

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    AGREEMENT between Honeywell, Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC and Local Lodge No. 778 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Effective November 21, 2011 through November 19, 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLES PAGE ARTICLE 1. AGREEMENT ....................................................................................................................... 3 ARTICLE 2. INTENT

  8. AGREEMENT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NJ.07 -34 AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT, effective September2.?, 1979 by and between THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (hereinafter called the "Government"), acting through the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (hereinafter called the "DOE"), and Tobar Construction Co. Inc. (hereinafter called the "Principal"), with a mailing address of P.O. Box 2011, Morristown, N.J. 07960, and the STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (hereinafter called the

  9. Occupational radiation Exposure at Agreement State-Licensed Materials Facilities, 1997-2010

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

    2012-07-07

    The purpose of this report is to examine occupational radiation exposures received under Agreement State licensees. As such, this report reflects the occupational radiation exposure data contained in the Radiation Exposure Information and Reporting System (REIRS) database, for 1997 through 2010, from Agreement State-licensed materials facilities.

  10. Federal Facilities Compliance Act, Draft Site Treatment Plan: Background Volume, Part 2, Volume 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1994-08-31

    This Draft Site Treatment Plan was prepared by Ames Laboratory to meet the requirements of the Federal Facilities Compliance Act. Topics discussed include: purpose and scope of the plan; site history and mission; draft plant organization; waste minimization; waste characterization; preferred option selection process; technology for treating low-level radioactive wastes and TRU wastes; future generation of mixed waste streams; funding; and process for evaluating disposal issues in support of the site treatment plan.

  11. Federal Facility Compliance Act, Proposed Site Treatment Plan: Background Volume. Executive Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-03-24

    This Federal Facility Compliance Act Site Treatment Plan discusses the options of radioactive waste management for Ames Laboratory. This is the background volume which discusses: site history and mission; framework for developing site treatment plans; proposed plan organization and related activities; characterization of mixed waste and waste minimization; low level mixed waste streams and the proposed treatment approach; future generation of TRU and mixed wastes; the adequacy of mixed waste storage facilities; and a summary of the overall DOE activity in the area of disposal of mixed waste treatment residuals.

  12. Los Alamos National Laboratory Compliance Order, October 4, 1995 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Federal Facility Compliance Order State New Mexico Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) New Mexico Hazardous Waste Act (NMHWA)/ FFCAct /RCRA Scope Summary Require compliance with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Los Alamos National Lab. Parties DOE; University of California; New Mexico Environment Department Date 10/04/1995 SCOPE * Require compliance with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Los Alamos National Lab. * Bring the Los

  13. The Department of Energy has opted to utilize the following agreement for Designated Non-Proprietary User Facilities transactions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    agreement for Designated Proprietary User Facilities transactions. Because these transactions are widespread across Departmental facilities, uniformity in agreement terms is desirable. Except for the *** provisions, minor modifications to the terms of this agreement may be made by CONTRACTOR, but any changes to the *** provisions or substantive changes to the non *** provisons will require approval by the DOE Contracting Officer, WHICH WILL LIKEY DELAY YOUR ACCESS TO THE USER FACILITY. In

  14. Materials and Fuels Complex Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lisa Harvego; Brion Bennett

    2011-09-01

    Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Materials and Fuels Complex facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool for developing the radioactive waste management basis.

  15. Materials and Security Consolidation Complex Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Listed

    2011-09-01

    Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Materials and Security Consolidation Center facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool for developing the radioactive waste management basis.

  16. Research and Education Campus Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    L. Harvego; Brion Bennett

    2011-11-01

    U.S. Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory Research and Education Campus facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool to develop the radioactive waste management basis.

  17. MONTICELLO NPL SITES Minutes and Action Items of the Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Minutes and Action Items of the Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting September 16 and 17,2008 Meeting Location U.S. Department of Energy Site Office, Monticello, Utah Meeting Attendees Jalena Dayvault- U.S. Department of Energy Tim Bartlett- S.M. Stoller Todd Moon- S.M. Stoller Linda Sheader- S. M. Stoller Paul Wetherstein- S.M. Stoller Brent Everett- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Duane Mortensen- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Paul Mushovic- U.S. Environmental Protection

  18. Monticello NPL Sites Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting Minutes & Action Items

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NPL Sites Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting Minutes & Action Items Location Monticello, Utah- DOE Office of Legacy Management field office Date September 27,2006 Attendees David Bird- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Paul Mushovic- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Att Kleinrath- U.S. Depmtment of Energy Tim Bartlett- S. M. Stoller Meeting topics and discussion points are summarized separately under the headings that follow. Attaclunent 1 to this report includes the agenda and

  19. The Oak Ridge Reservation PCB Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement, October 28, 1996

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  20. U.S. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement for the Hanford Site, February 7, 1994

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  1. South Valley Compliance Agreement

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  2. The Department of Energy has opted to utilize the following agreement for Designated Non-Proprietary User Facilities transactions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NPU 10/13/2009 1 The Department of Energy has opted to utilize the following agreement for Designated Non-Proprietary User Facilities transactions. Because these transactions are widespread across Departmental facilities, uniformity in agreement terms is desirable. Except for the *** provisions, minor modifications to the terms of this agreement may be made by CONTRACTOR, but any changes to the *** provisions or substantive changes to the non *** provisons will require approval by the DOE

  3. Federal Facility Compliance Act: Conceptual Site Treatment Plan for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-10-01

    The Department of Energy (DOE) is required by section 3021(b) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended by the Federal Facility Compliance Act (the Act), to prepare plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. The Act requires site treatment plans (STPs or plans) to be developed for each site at which DOE generates or stores mixed waste and submitted to the State or EPA for approval, approval with modification, or disapproval. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Conceptual Site Treatment Plan (CSTP) is the preliminary version of the plan required by the Act and is being provided to California, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and others for review. A list of the other DOE sites preparing CSTPs is included in Appendix 1.1 of this document. Please note that Appendix 1.1 appears as Appendix A, pages A-1 and A-2 in this document.

  4. Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy-Related Health Research Agreement Name Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Compliance Order HWCA # 95/96-020 State California Agreement Type Compliance Order Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic

  5. Advanced Test Reactor Complex Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lisa Harvego; Brion Bennett

    2011-11-01

    U.S. Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Advanced Test Reactor Complex facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. U.S. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool to develop the radioactive waste management basis.

  6. Uranium-Loaded Water Treatment Resins: 'Equivalent Feed' at NRC and Agreement State-Licensed Uranium Recovery Facilities - 12094

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Camper, Larry W.; Michalak, Paul; Cohen, Stephen; Carter, Ted

    2012-07-01

    Community Water Systems (CWSs) are required to remove uranium from drinking water to meet EPA standards. Similarly, mining operations are required to remove uranium from their dewatering discharges to meet permitted surface water discharge limits. Ion exchange (IX) is the primary treatment strategy used by these operations, which loads uranium onto resin beads. Presently, uranium-loaded resin from CWSs and mining operations can be disposed as a waste product or processed by NRC- or Agreement State-licensed uranium recovery facilities if that licensed facility has applied for and received permission to process 'alternate feed'. The disposal of uranium-loaded resin is costly and the cost to amend a uranium recovery license to accept alternate feed can be a strong disincentive to commercial uranium recovery facilities. In response to this issue, the NRC issued a Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) to clarify the agency's policy that uranium-loaded resin from CWSs and mining operations can be processed by NRC- or Agreement State-licensed uranium recovery facilities without the need for an alternate feed license amendment when these resins are essentially the same, chemically and physically, to resins that licensed uranium recovery facilities currently use (i.e., equivalent feed). NRC staff is clarifying its current alternate feed policy to declare IX resins as equivalent feed. This clarification is necessary to alleviate a regulatory and financial burden on facilities that filter uranium using IX resin, such as CWSs and mine dewatering operations. Disposing of those resins in a licensed facility could be 40 to 50 percent of the total operations and maintenance (O and M) cost for a CWS. Allowing uranium recovery facilities to treat these resins without requiring a license amendment lowers O and M costs and captures a valuable natural resource. (authors)

  7. South Valley Compliance Agreement Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    the South Valley Superfund Site. Parties DOE; U.S. Air Force Date 9261990 SCOPE * Set forth the actions required of the USAF and DOE to fulfill their respective responsibilities...

  8. The Agreement - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Record (AR) Related Links The Agreement Email Email Page | Print Print Page |Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent...

  9. State Agreements-In-Principle

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The EM Office of Regulatory Compliance coordinates within EM offices and other Departmental organizations to review proposed Agreements-in-Principle (AIPs) with States. We review proposed...

  10. Rocky Flats Compliance Program; Technology summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1994-02-01

    The Department of Energy (DOE) established the Office of Technology Development (EM-50) (OTD) as an element of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) in November 1989. The primary objective of the Office of Technology Development, Rocky Flats Compliance Program (RFCP), is to develop altemative treatment technologies for mixed low-level waste (wastes containing both hazardous and radioactive components) to use in bringing the Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) into compliance with Federal and state regulations and agreements. Approximately 48,000 cubic feet of untreated low-level mixed waste, for which treatment has not been specified, are stored at the RFP. The cleanup of the Rocky Flats site is driven by agreements between DOE, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Colorado Department of Health (CDH). Under these agreements, a Comprehensive Treatment and Management Plan (CTMP) was drafted to outline the mechanisms by which RFP will achieve compliance with the regulations and agreements. This document describes DOE`s strategy to treat low-level mixed waste to meet Land Disposal Restrictions and sets specific milestones related to the regulatory aspects of technology development. These milestones detail schedules for the development of technologies to treat all of the mixed wastes at the RFP. Under the Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA), the CTMP has been incorporated into Rocky Flats Plant Conceptual Site Treatment Plan (CSTP). The CSTP will become the Rocky Flats Plant site Treatment Plan in 1995 and will supersede the CTMP.

  11. Compliance Evaluation | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Disposal Facility (SRR-CWDA-2009-00017, R0), hereafter referred to as the Saltstone PA, is acceptable. PDF icon Compliance Evaluation More Documents & Publications 2009...

  12. US Department of Energy`s Federal Facility Compliance Act Chief Financial Officer`s Report to Congress for fiscal year 1993

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-12-01

    The Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992 (FFCAct) (Public Law 102-386) was enacted into law on October 6, 1992. In addition to amending the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the FFCAct requires the US Department of Energy (DOE) to prepare an annual report from the Chief Financial Officer to the Congress on compliance activities undertaken by the DOE with regard to mixed waste streams and provide an accounting of the fines and penalties imposed upon the DOE for violations involving mixed waste. This document has been prepared to report the necessary information. Mixed waste is defined by the FFCAct to include those wastes containing both hazardous waste as defined in the RCRA and source, special nuclear, or byproduct material subject to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. Section 2001 et seq.). Section 2 of this report briefly summarizes DOE Headquarters` activities conducted during Fiscal Year 1993 (FY 1993) to comply with the requirements of the FFCAct. Section 3 of this report provides an overview of the site-specific RCRA compliance activities, relating to mixed waste streams, conducted in FY 1993 for those sites that currently generated or store mixed waste that are subject to regulation under RCRA. Section 4 provides information on notifications of alleged RCRA violations involving mixed waste imposed upon the DOE during FY 1993 and an accounting of any fines and penalties associated with these violations. Appendix A provides site-specific summaries of RCRA compliance activities, relating to mixed waste streams, conducted in FY 1993 for those sites that currently generate or store mixed waste that are subject to regulation under RCRA.

  13. Sandia National Laboratories: Agreements

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Agreements Agreements We have transferred technology to the commercial sector for more than three decades, and make it possible for partners to access our world-class science, people, and infrastructure. Sandia National Laboratories has a robust technology transfer mission that is facilitated by several types of agreements. In compliance with the various statutory and administrative requirements, Sandia provides its expertise, technology and capabilities for benefit of the United States economy

  14. Environmental Compliance Performance

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Most Office of Environmental Management (EM) cleanup is being performed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) through Federal Facility Agreements...

  15. 300 area TEDF permit compliance monitoring plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    BERNESKI, L.D.

    1998-11-20

    This document presents the permit compliance monitoring plan for the 300 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility (TEDF). It addresses the compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and Department of Natural Resources Aquatic Lands Sewer Outfall Lease.

  16. National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Strategy for the Remote-Handled Low-level Waste Disposal Facility

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Peggy Hinman

    2010-10-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) needs to have disposal capability for remote-handled low level waste (LLW) generated at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) at the time the existing disposal facility is full or must be closed in preparation for final remediation of the INL Subsurface Disposal Area in approximately the year 2017.

  17. Environmental Compliance

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Federal environmental laws apply to DOE Loans and Loan Guarantees. The Loan Programs Office’s (LPO’s) Environmental Compliance Division is responsible for overseeing LPO’s compliance with...

  18. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF AGREEMENT

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF AGREEMENT HWB-14-20 and HWB-14-21 These General Principles of Agreement ("Principles of Agreement") are agreed upon by the New Mexico Environment Department ("NMED"), and the United States Department of Energy ("DOE"), Los Alamos National Security, LLC ("LANS"), and Nuclear Waste Partnership, LLC ("NWP") (collectively, with DOE and LANS, the "DOE Permittees") for the purpose of resolving Compliance Order Nos.

  19. Program management plan for development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation efforts associated with Oak Ridge Reservation`s Land Disposal Restrictions Federal Facility Compliance Agreement

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Conley, T.B.

    1994-04-01

    This program management plan covers the development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation efforts necessary to identify treatment methods for all the waste listed in Appendix B of the ORR`s LDR/FFCA as well as any new wastes which meet Appendix B criteria. To successfully identify a treatment method, at least a proof-of-principle level of understanding must be obtained: that is, the candidate processes must be demonstrated as effective in treating the wastes to the LDR; however, an optimized process is not required. Where applicable and deemed necessary and where the budgets will support them, pilot-scale demonstrations will be pursued. The overall strategy being adopted in this program will be composed of the following activities: Scoping of the study; characterization; development and screening of alternatives; treatability investigations; and detailed analysis of alternatives.

  20. Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Facilities Facilities LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. Contact Operator Los Alamos National Laboratory (505) 667-5061 Some LANL facilities are available to researchers at other laboratories, universities, and industry. Unique facilities foster experimental science, support LANL's security mission DARHT

  1. Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Secure and Sustainable Energy Future Mission/Facilities - FacilitiesTara Camacho-Lopez2015-10-27T01:52:50+00:00 National Solar Thermal Test Facility (NSTTF) facility_nsttf_slide NSTTF's primary goal is to provide experimental engineering data for the design, construction, and operation of unique components and systems in proposed solar thermal electrical plants, which have three generic system architectures: line-focus (trough and continuous linear Fresnel reflector systems), point-focus central

  2. FEMO, A FLOW AND ENRICHMENT MONITOR FOR VERIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL SAFEGUARDS REQUIREMENTS AT A GAS CENTRIFUGE ENRICHMENT FACILITY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gunning, John E; Laughter, Mark D; March-Leuba, Jose A

    2008-01-01

    A number of countries have received construction licenses or are contemplating the construction of large-capacity gas centrifuge enrichment plants (GCEPs). The capability to independently verify nuclear material flows is a key component of international safeguards approaches, and the IAEA does not currently have an approved method to continuously monitor the mass flow of 235U in uranium hexafluoride (UF6) gas streams. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is investigating the development of a flow and enrichment monitor, or FEMO, based on an existing blend-down monitoring system (BDMS). The BDMS was designed to continuously monitor both 235U mass flow and enrichment of UF6 streams at the low pressures similar to those which exists at GCEPs. BDMSs have been installed at three sites-the first unit has operated successfully in an unattended environment for approximately 10 years. To be acceptable to GCEP operators, it is essential that the instrument be installed and maintained without interrupting operations. A means to continuously verify flow as is proposed by FEMO will likely be needed to monitor safeguards at large-capacity plants. This will enable the safeguards effectiveness that currently exists at smaller plants to be maintained at the larger facilities and also has the potential to reduce labor costs associated with inspections at current and future plants. This paper describes the FEMO design requirements, operating capabilities, and development work required before field demonstration.

  3. Regulatory Compliance | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. The Department of Energy is not a regulatory agency; however it does self-regulate its own radioactive waste. DOE is also affected by a variety of statutes, legislation,

  4. Alternative Compliance

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Compliance Individual Permit: Alternative Compliance When permittees believe they have installed measures to minimize pollutants but are unable to certify completion of corrective action, they may seek to place a Site into Alternative Compliance. Contact Environmental Communication & Public Involvement P.O. Box 1663 MS M996 Los Alamos, NM 87545 (505) 667-0216 Email Alternative Compliance Requests to EPA SMA SITE Submittal Date Document 2M-SMA-1.42 06-001(a) February 26, 2016 NPDES Permit No.

  5. Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Facilities - An example of a probablistic solar forecast produced with PRESCIENT. Permalink Gallery Sandia Develops Stochastic Production Cost Model Simulator for Electric Power Systems Analysis, Capabilities, Computational Modeling & Simulation, DETL, Distribution Grid Integration, Energy, Facilities, Grid Integration, Modeling, Modeling, Modeling & Analysis, Modeling & Analysis, News, News & Events, Photovoltaic, Renewable Energy, Research & Capabilities, Solar, Solar

  6. Assessment of the Idaho National Laboratory Hot Fuel Examination Facility Stack Monitoring Site for Compliance with ANSI/HPS N13.1 1999

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Glissmeyer, John A.; Flaherty, Julia E.

    2010-08-27

    This document reports on a series of tests to determine whether the location of the air sampling probe in the Hot Fuels Examination Facility (HFEF) heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) exhaust duct meets the applicable regulatory criteria regarding the placement of an air sampling probe. Federal regulations require that a sampling probe be located in the exhaust stack according to the criteria of the ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999, Sampling and Monitoring Releases of Airborne Radioactive Substances from the Stacks and Ducts of Nuclear Facilities. These criteria address the capability of the sampling probe to extract a sample that is representative of the effluent stream. The tests conducted by PNNL during July 2010 on the HFEF system are described in this report. The sampling probe location is approximately 20 feet from the base of the stack. The stack base is in the second floor of the HFEF, and has a building ventilation stream (limited potential radioactive effluent) as well as a process stream (potential radioactive effluent, but HEPA-filtered) that feeds into it. The tests conducted on the duct indicate that the process stream is insufficiently mixed with the building ventilation stream. As a result, the air sampling probe location does not meet the criteria of the N13.1-1999 standard. The series of tests consists of various measurements taken over a grid of points in the duct cross section at the proposed sampling-probe location. The results of the test series on the HFEF exhaust duct as it relates to the criteria from ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999 are desribed in this report. Based on these tests, the location of the air sampling probe does not meet the requirements of the ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999 standard, and modifications must be made to either the HVAC system or the air sampling probe for compliance. The recommended approaches are discussed and vary from sampling probe modifications to modifying the junction of the two air exhaust streams.

  7. Agreement Mechanisms

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Agreement Mechanisms Agreement Mechanisms World-class experts and capabilities countering all aspects of explosive threats, and aiming predominantly at enhanced detection capabilities. CRADA: Cooperative Research and Development Agreement What is it? Work performed in collaboration with a sponsor. What does it do? Enables Los Alamos staff to participate with industry, academia, and nonprofit entities on collaborative R&D activities of mutual benefit. When is it used? An organization's

  8. Agreement Matrix

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    be limited to 5 years. Certification: The Lab provided this DOE technology transfer matrix and explained all the options available including the availability of WFO agreements...

  9. MOBILITY AGREEMENT

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    MOBILITY AGREEMENT I hereby acknowledge that, as a condition of my employment as a Criminal Investigator with the Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General, I may be...

  10. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Treatment Plan Compliance...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    an Agreement addressing compliance with the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 to RCRA. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * The Site Treatment Plan provides for a three-year...

  11. User Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    User Facilities User Facilities User facility agreements allow Los Alamos partners and other entities to conduct research at our unique facilities. In 2011, LANL hosted more than 1,200 users at CINT, LANSCE, and NHMFL. Users came from across the DOE complex, from international academia, and from industrial companies from 45 states across the U.S. Unique world-class user facilities foster rich research opportunities Through its technology transfer efforts, LANL can implement user facility

  12. Enterprise-Wide Agreements | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Enterprise-Wide Agreements Enterprise-Wide Agreements hand-819279_960_720.jpg Enterprise-Wide Agreements The IT Acquisition: Enterprise-Wide Agreement (EWA) Program develops policies and procedures that support the identification, acquisition, oversight and compliance of enterprise licenses. The EWA Program's core objectives are to: Maximize IT buying power Reduce the total cost of ownership Streamline the IT total acquisition lifecycle The EWA Program employs a centralized, cross-functional,

  13. PFP Tentative Agreement.PDF

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    AGREEMENT ON NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE PLUTONIUM FINISHING PLANT PROJECT In accordance with the requirements of the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) Agreement in Principle, the State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (Parties) have concluded negotiations on the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement) Section 8 commitments for transition and selected dispositio n

  14. Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Compliance...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Compliance Approach Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Conversion Facilities Project Notice of Change in National...

  15. User Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    User Facilities /collaboration/_assets/images/icon-collaboration.jpg User Facilities A new research frontier awaits! Our door is open and we thrive on mutually beneficial partnerships, collaborations that drive innovations and new technologies. Unique world-class user facilities foster rich research opportunities Through its technology transfer efforts, LANL can implement user facility agreements that allow its partners and other entities to conduct research at many of its unique facilities.

  16. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS Signed by Secretary Spencer Abraham January 2001-December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Joint Statement of ntent between the Department of Energy of the United States ofAmerica and The Ministry of Energy and Mines of the Republic ofPeru on Cooperation in the Field of Energy -Tab 1 Fifth Hemispheric Energy Ministers Meeting Mexico City, Mexico - March 9, 2001. Mexico Declaration - Energy: A Crucial Factor for Integration and Sustainable Development in the Hemisphere - Tab 2

  17. Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Compliance

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Approach | Department of Energy Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Compliance Approach Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Compliance Approach Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Conversion Facilities Project Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Compliance Approach for the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Conversion Facilities Project (4/28/03). The purpose of this Notice is to inform the public of the change in the approach for the

  18. Public Service Company of Colorado v. Batt Agreement

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Settlement Agreement: Public Service Company of Colorado v. Batt EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Settlement Agreement: Public Service Company of Colorado v. Batt Table of Contents A. Definitions B. Transuranic Waste Shipments Leaving Idaho C. Spent Fuel & High-Level Waste Shipments Leaving Idaho D. Shipments of Spent Fuel to INEL E. Treatment & Transfer of Existing Wastes at INEL F. Spent Fuel Programs G. INEL Environmental Restoration Program H.

  19. Ground-water monitoring compliance projects for Hanford Site facilities: Progress Report for the Period July 1 to September 30, 1987

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1987-11-01

    This report documents the progress of four Hanford Site ground-water monitoring projects for the period from July 1 to September 310, 1987. The four disposal facilities are the 300 Area Process Trenches, 183-H Solar Evaporation Basins, 200 Area Low-Level Burial Grounds, and Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste (NRDW) Landfill. This report is the fifth in a series of periodic status reports. During this reporting period, field activities consisted of completing repairs on five monitoring wells originally present around the 183-H Basins and completing construction of 25 monitoring wells around the 200 Area Burial Grounds. The 14 wells in the 200 East Area were completed by Kaiser Engineers Hanford (KEH) and the 11 wells in the 200 West Area were compelted by ONWEGO Well Drilling. The NRDW Landfill interim characterization report was submitted to the WDOE and the USEPA in August 1987. Analytical results for the 300 Area, 183-H, and the NRDW Landfill indicate no deviations from previously established trends. Results from the NRDW Land-fill indiate that the facility has no effect on the ground-water quality beneath the facility, except for the detection of coliform bacteria. A possible source of this contamination is the solid-waste lanfill (SWL) adjacent to the NRDW Landfill. Ground-water monitoring data for the NRDW and SWL will be evaluated together in the future. Aquifer testing was completed in the 25 new wells surrounding the 200 Area buiral grounds. 13 refs., 19 refs., 13 tabs.

  20. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Berkeley National Laboratory Agreement Name Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 HWCA # 95/96-016 State California Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at LBNL Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 10/6/1995 SCOPE * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment

  1. Compliance Order on Consent

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Compliance Order on Consent Compliance Order on Consent The Compliance Order on Consent provides the requirements for environmental cleanup of hazardous constituents for LANL. Contact Environmental Communication & Public Involvement P.O. Box 1663 MS M996 Los Alamos, NM 87545 (505) 667-0216 Email What is the Compliance Order on Consent? The Compliance Order on Consent between the State of New Mexico Environment Department and the United States Department of Energy and Los Alamos National

  2. Requirements to coordinate agreements, milestones and decision documents

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    (AMDD) | Department of Energy to coordinate agreements, milestones and decision documents (AMDD) Requirements to coordinate agreements, milestones and decision documents (AMDD) Environmental agreements, milestones and decision documents (AMDD) which meet certain thresholds are reviewed and approved by Headquarters (HQ) before entering into negotiations and commitments. PDF icon Requirements to coordinate regulatory negotiations with the EM Office of Regulatory Compliance: new and modified

  3. Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Program Management Compliance Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) The Low-Level Waste...

  4. Facility Floorplan

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Facility Floorplan

  5. User Agreements | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    Office of Science (SC) Website

    User Agreements User Facilities User Facilities Home User Facilities at a Glance User Resources Getting Started User Safety Access Models User Agreements Data Management Resources Acknowledging User Facilities User Statistics Policies and Processes Science Highlights Frequently Asked Questions User Facility News Contact Information Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5430 User Resources User Agreements Print Text Size: A A A

  6. Oil Mist Compliance

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lazarus, Lloyd

    2009-02-02

    This report summarizes activities at the KCP related to evaluating and modifying machine tools in order to be in compliance with Section 23 of DOE 10 CFR 851, Worker Safety and Health Program. Section 851.23 (a) states that “Contractors must comply with the following safety and health standards that are applicable to the hazards in their covered workplace”, and subsection 9 contains the following applicable standard: “American Congress of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), ‘Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices,’ (2005) (incorporated by reference, see §851.27) when the ACGIH Threshold Limit Values are lower (more protective) than permissible exposure limits in 29 CFR 1910.” In the 2005 ACGIH – Threshold Limit Value book a Notice of Change was issued for exposure to mineral oil mist used in metalworking fluids (MWFs). The effects of planning for the new facility and which machine tools would be making the transition to the new facility affected which machine tools were modified.

  7. DOE NEPA Compliance Officers

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NEPA Compliance Officers are listed by program office. Field offices are listed under their primary program office.

  8. Managing Uncertainty and Demonstrating Compliance | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Uncertainty and Demonstrating Compliance Managing Uncertainty and Demonstrating Compliance Presentation from the 2015 Annual Performance and Risk Assessment (P&RA) Community of Practice (CoP) Technical Exchange Meeting held in Richland, Washington on December 15-16, 2015. PDF icon Managing Uncertainty and Demonstrating Compliance More Documents & Publications Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting 03/05/09 DOE-HDBK-1215-2014 2009 Performance Assessment for the Saltstone Disposal Facility

  9. Executive Order 12088: Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    | Department of Energy 2088: Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards Executive Order 12088: Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards The head of each Executive agency is responsible for ensuring that all necessary actions are taken for the prevention, control, and abatement of environmental pollution with respect to Federal facilities and activities under the control of the agency. PDF icon Executive Order 12088: Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards More

  10. Los Alamos National Laboratory Consent Agreement, December 10, 1993 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Consent Agreement State New Mexico Agreement Type Consent Agreement Legal Driver(s) New Mexico Hazardous Waste Act/ RCRA Scope Summary Resolve Compliance Orders issued against DOE regarding the placement of transuranic waste on existing pads. The agreement will result in DOE subsequently placing transuranic waste on pads that are compliant with RCRA and the NM Hazardous Waste Act. Parties DOE; University of California; New Mexico Environment Department Date 12/10/1993 SCOPE * Establish a

  11. 300 area TEDF NPDES Permit Compliance Monitoring Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Loll, C.M.

    1995-09-05

    This document presents the 300 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility (TEDF) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Compliance Monitoring Plan (MP). The MP describes how ongoing monitoring of the TEDF effluent stream for compliance with the NPDES permit will occur. The MP also includes Quality Assurance protocols to be followed.

  12. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    requirements for the performance of a Remedial Investigation (RI). * Identify the nature, objective, and schedule of response actions to be taken at the Site. ESTABLISHING...

  13. Brookhaven National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement, February...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    requirements for the performance of Remedial Investigation(s) and the performance of Feasibility Studies(s). ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Specific schedules and deadlines are set...

  14. Uranium Processing Facility team signs partnering agreement ...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    This Site Budget IG Web Policy Privacy No Fear Act Accessibility FOIA Sitemap Federal Government The White House DOE.gov USA.gov Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA...

  15. MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    August 2004 Report Period: July 1- August 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS Two monitoring wells were installed, which completed the monitoring network for OU III. The following documents have been completed: * * Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III Post-Record of Decision Monitoring Plan * Remedial Action/Remedial Design Workplan for the Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III MRAP DOE is continuing discussions with the City of Monticello concerning

  16. MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    May/June 2004 Report Period: May 1- June 30, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Record of Decision for the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) Site Operable Unit IlL Swface Water and Ground Water, Monticello, Utah, was signed by DOE, UDEQ, and EPA. The last signature was obtained on June 2, 2004, seven days before the scheduled completion date. Monitored Natnral Attenuation is the selected remedy. MRAP The water level in the Pond 4 Leak Detection System is monitored daily;

  17. MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    November/December 2004 Report Period: November 1- December 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Program Directive for the wildlife survey is on schedule for completion by January 15. Comments from the Biological Technical Assistance group have been incorporated. MRAP A punchlist of mill site restoration items was prepared. DOE and the City of Monticello have agreed upon which entity will perform each item on the punchlist. MVP No significant activities to report. FF A

  18. MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    September/October 2004 Report Period: September 1- October 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS With the completion of all remedial action reports, installation of monitoring wells in accordance with the Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan, and an onsite inspection by EPA and UDEQ, EPA was able tci write and sign the Preliminmy Closeout Report for the Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS), Operable Units I, II, and III. With EPA's signature on this document (September

  19. MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    January/February 2005 Report Period: January 1 -February 28, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), and U.S. Department ofEnergy (DOE) agreed that the Monticello Administrative Manual and Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Operating Procedures will not be combined into a single manual. Instead, the Monticello LTSM Operating Procedures for Swface and Ground Water will be written to

  20. MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    August/September 2005 Report Period: July 1- September 30, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The draft-final Monticello Long-Term Surveillance and Afaintenance Operating Procedures for Swface and Ground Water (Volume III) and draft-final Annual Data Summmy Report for Operable Unit Ill of the Monticello Mill Tailings Site, October 2004 through April 2005 were completed. MRAP The annual inspection of the Monticello Mill Tailings Site and the Monticello Vicinity Properties was

  1. Hanford Federal Facility Agreement & Consent Order

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    PCB Transformer disposal. The nineteen Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) electrical transformers at the FFTF will be disposed of after the transformers are removed from service....

  2. Environmental Compliance and Protection Program Description Oak Ridge, Tennessee

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bechtel Jacobs

    2009-02-26

    The objective of the Environmental Compliance and Protection (EC and P) Program Description (PD) is to establish minimum environmental compliance requirements and natural resources protection goals for the Bechtel Jacobs Company LLC (BJC) Oak Ridge Environmental Management Cleanup Contract (EMCC) Contract Number DE-AC05-98OR22700-M198. This PD establishes the work practices necessary to ensure protection of the environment during the performance of EMCC work activities on the US Department of Energy's (DOE's) Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, by BJC employees and subcontractor personnel. Both BJC and subcontractor personnel are required to implement this PD. A majority of the decontamination and demolition (D and D) activities and media (e.g., soil and groundwater) remediation response actions at DOE sites on the ORR are conducted under the authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). CERCLA activities are governed by individual CERCLA decision documents (e.g., Record of Decision [ROD] or Action Memorandum) and according to requirements stated in the Federal Facility Agreement for the Oak Ridge Reservation (DOE 1992). Applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) for the selected remedy are the requirements for environmental remediation responses (e.g., removal actions and remedial actions) conducted under CERCLA.

  3. Tri Party Agreement Administrative Record Presentation for Dennis A. Faulk, EPA Jane A. Hedges, Ecology

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    TPA) and Milestone Tutorial John Price, Ecology What is it? Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (HFFACO) * Legal Agreement, Parts One - Five - Federal Facility Agreement between US Department of Energy and US Environmental Protection Agency (US DOE and US EPA) - Consent Order between US DOE and Washington Department of Ecology - A 3-party agreement [TPA] on how to integrate the Federal Facility Agreement with the Consent Order Why is there an EPA-DOE Federal Facility Agreement?

  4. Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Compliance Order, October 6, 1995

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Compliance Order, October 6, 1.. Page 1 of 11 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL _________________________________ In the Matter of: LABORATORY FOR ENERGY-RELATED HEALTH RESEARCH (LEHR). HWCA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Respondent. ) )

  5. Environmental Compliance Performance | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Compliance Environmental Compliance Performance Environmental Compliance Performance Most Office of Environmental Management (EM) cleanup is being performed under the...

  6. Environmental Compliance Guide

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1981-02-01

    Volume II supplements Vol. I in providing procedures, relative timing, and details to assist in achieving compliance with Federal environmental requirements. (PSB)

  7. DOE Cooperative Research and Development Agreements

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2001-01-12

    To establish Department of Energy (DOE) policy, requirements, and responsibilities for the oversight, management, and administration of Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) activities at DOE facilities. No cancellation.

  8. DOE Cooperative Research and Development Agreements

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2013-11-06

    The order establishes policy, requirements, and responsibilities for the oversight, management, and administration of Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) activities at DOE facilities. Supersedes DOE O 483.1 Admin Chg 1 and DOE M 483.1-1.

  9. Continuous compliance demonstrations with parametric monitoring

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Reynolds, W.E.; Hazel, K.R.

    1995-12-01

    Traditionally, the stationary source air compliance program has required facilities subject to air emissions standards to demonstrate their ability to comply with the emissions standards during an initial source performance tests. Demonstrating compliance at start-up, however, does not assure that a source will remain in compliance. To assure compliance after start-up, EPA`s responsibility to catch those in violation of standards. Under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA 1990), Congress, shifted the burden of assuring compliance from the administrator to the owner or operator of the source. This shift will be implemented through the Enhanced Monitoring (EM) rule. Congress put specific language in the Act to allow flexibility for innovative alternatives to continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMs). Section 504(b) states that {open_quotes}continuous emissions monitoring need not be required if alternative methods are available that provide sufficient reliable and timely information for determining compliance.{close_quotes} Section 114 (a)(3) permits the Administrator to accept as Enhanced Monitoring, records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data as an alternative to direct emission measurements. This alternative, Parametric Monitoring, is acceptable if the facility can demonstrate a correlation between the applicable emission standard and the parameters being monitored. Common approaches to the use of parametric monitoring are illustrated here through a brief overview of three enhanced monitoring protocols. The first example uses boiler output to predict quantitative nitrogen oxides (NO{sub x}) emission rates from a gas-fired electric utility boiler. The second example uses parametric data collected in the operation of a venturi scrubber to determine compliance or noncompliance with a particulate emissions limitation. The third example illustrates an alternative use of parametric data collected from a venturi scrubber.

  10. Davis-Bacon Act Compliance Video

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Davis-Bacon Act Compliance Video

  11. Tribal Programs, Special Initiatives, and Cooperative Agreements |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Programs, Special Initiatives, and Cooperative Agreements Tribal Programs, Special Initiatives, and Cooperative Agreements EM is involved in the cleanup of nuclear waste at nationwide sites and facilities. The waste, a result of the production of nuclear weapons, has affected sovereign Tribal nations located near these facilities. These Tribal nations have been impacted by different types of waste contamination, and their participation in the EM mission is critical.

  12. 1993 Annual performance report for Environmental Oversight and Monitoring at Department of Energy facilities in New Mexico

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-12-31

    In October of 1990, the New Mexico Environment Department entered into an agreement with the US Department of Energy (DOE) to create the Department of Energy Oversight and Monitoring Program. This program is designed to create an avenue for the State to ensure DOE facilities are in compliance with applicable environmental regulations, to allow the State oversight and monitoring independent of the DOE, to allow the State valuable input into remediation decision making, and to protect the environment and the public health and safety of New Mexicans concerning DOE facility activities. This agreement, called the Agreement in Principle (AIP), includes all four of New Mexico`s DOE facilities: Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos; Sandia National Laboratories and the Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute on Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque; and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad.

  13. II. GENERAL COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    The objectives of most compliance requirements for DOE programs are generic in nature. ... As such, the applicability of each compliance requirement should depend on the nature and ...

  14. STEP Participation Agreement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    STEP Participation Agreement, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

  15. Power Purchase Agreements

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation covers the power purchase agreements taken from the FEMP Alternative Finance Options (AFO) webinar.

  16. Nondisclosure Agreements | NREL

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Nondisclosure Agreements NREL's nondisclosure agreement (NDA) process ensures the strict confidentiality of proprietary or confidential information between the laboratory and a partner. We've established this process to develop mutually beneficial R&D collaborations in a straightforward, flexible, timely, and efficient manner. Agreement Types Unilateral Nondisclosure Agreement - NREL Disclosing NREL provides its proprietary information to the other party. Download sample agreement Unilateral

  17. Nuclear safety information sharing agreement between NRC and...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    related to safety issues associated with non-reactor nuclear facilities. The NRC-DOE Inter-Agency nuclear safety information sharing agreement provides a formal vehicle ...

  18. Establish a User Agreement

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Establish a User Agreement Print User Agreements are Required Before a user group can begin their research at the ALS, a User Agreement between Berkeley Lab and the user's sponsoring organization must be signed. Many organizations already have a signed agreement, however if your organization has not established an agreement, please send an email to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it to set one up. The User Agreement is valid for up to

  19. Commitments/Agreements

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DOE-ID Agreements & Commitments You are here: DOE-ID Home > Inside ID > DOE-ID Agreements & Commitments Spent Fuel Settlement Agreement The Spent Fuel Settlement Agreement agreement permits DOE to receive up to 1,133 shipments of spent nuclear fuel at the Idaho National Laboratory for storage over the next 40 years. In return, the agreement sets a timetable for the treatment of high-level waste now stored at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center, and the removal of

  20. Establish a User Agreement

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Establish a User Agreement Print User Agreements are Required Before a user group can begin their research at the ALS, a User Agreement between Berkeley Lab and the user's sponsoring organization must be signed. Many organizations already have a signed agreement, however if your organization has not established an agreement, please send an email to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it to set one up. The User Agreement is valid for up to

  1. Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 State Tennessee Agreement Type Compliance Order Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Enforce the Plan and ensure that the Respondent completes all work in accordance with the schedules contained in, and/or developed pursuant to, the Plan Parties DOE; Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Date 9/26/1995 SCOPE * Approve, with modifications made by TDEC, the "Proposed Site Treatment Plan for the Oak Ridge

  2. Environmental Compliance Guide

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1981-02-01

    The Guide is intended to assist Department of Energy personnel by providing information on the NEPA process, the processes of other environmental statutes that bear on the NEPA process, the timing relationships between the NEPA process and these other processes, as well as timing relationships between the NEPA process and the development process for policies, programs, and projects. This information should be helpful not only in formulating environmental compliance plans but also in achieving compliance with NEPA and various other environmental statutes. The Guide is divided into three parts with related appendices: Part I provides guidance for developing environmental compliance plans for DOE actions; Part II is devoted to NEPA with detailed flowcharts depicting the compliance procedures required by CEQ regulations and Department of Energy NEPA Guidelines; and Part III contains a series of flowcharts for other Federal environmental requirements that may apply to DOE projects.

  3. Compliance | ARPA-E

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Compliance View ARPA-E NEPA Compliance documents View the Whistleblower Protection and Nondisclosure Notice The U.S. Department of Energy is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. Send feedback or concerns related to the accessibility of this website to DOE Section 508 Coordinator mailbox. For more information about Section 508,

  4. Environmental Compliance Assistance Tool

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    1999-04-16

    ENVIROCAT is a database/knowledge base software system designed to assist in environment, safety and health (ES&H) regulatory compliance assessments of manufacturing processes. Materials and processes are mapped to ES&H regulations. The regulations database identifies materials'' quantities and limits of compliance. Materials are identified per descriptive name or CAS number. ENVIROCAT has an interactive user/tool capability such that a question and answer session on materials and processes is custom tailored to a particular manufacturing site.

  5. Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    56-2011 June 2011 DOE STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. (Unclassified Unlimited) DOE-STD-1156-2011 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/

  6. Technology Partnership Agreements | NREL

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Technology Partnership Agreements Looking for Funding? We do not fund any projects under a technology partnership agreement. The partner provides the necessary resources and, in most cases, covers our costs of providing technical services. NREL does provide funding opportunities through competitively placed contracts. See procurement. There are a variety of ways to partner with NREL using technology partnership agreements. See a summary of our Fiscal Year 2015 technology partnership agreements.

  7. Non-Disclosure Agreements

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Non-Disclosure Agreements Non-Disclosure Agreements Facilitate initial interactions between Los Alamos National Laboratory and a potential industrial partner on specific technical areas Contact NDA Team Richard P. Feynman Center for Innovation (505) 667-9911 Email A Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) protects proprietary information provided by one party to another from further disclosure. This agreement is frequently used to cover initial interactions between Los Alamos National Laboratory and a

  8. Compliance Documents | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Compliance » Compliance Documents Compliance Documents This photo shows the Savannah River Site’s Heavy Water Components Test Reactor during decommissioning. This photo shows the Savannah River Site's Heavy Water Components Test Reactor during decommissioning. Compliance and other legal documents illustrate and help support the development of effective compliance approaches and strategies, and can assist in promoting greater cooperation, coordination, and consistency with other EM offices,

  9. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services

    2004-10-25

    This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents environmental regulatory compliance at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed and authorized for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste, for the reporting period of April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2004. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) (Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, as amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) compliance with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations implemented by agencies of the federal government and the state of New Mexico.

  10. A survey of nuclear-related agreements and possibilities for nuclear cooperation in South Asia: Cooperative Monitoring Center Occasional Paper/15

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    RAJEN,GAURAV

    2000-04-01

    Several existing nuclear-related agreements already require India and Pakistan, as members, to share information. The agreements are bilateral, regional, and international. Greater nuclear transparency between India and Pakistan could be promoted by first understanding the information flows required by existing agreements. This understanding is an essential step for developing projects that can incrementally advance the sensitivity of the information being shared. This paper provides a survey of existing nuclear-related agreements involving India and Pakistan, and suggests future confidence-building projects using the frameworks provided by these agreements. The Bilateral Agreement on the Prohibition of Attack against Nuclear Reactors and Nuclear Facilities is discussed as a basis for creating further agreements on restricting the use and deployment of nuclear weapons. The author suggests options for enhancing the value of the list of nuclear facilities exchanged annually as a part of this agreement. The International Atomic Energy Agency's regional cooperation agreement among countries in the Asia-Pacific region is an opportunity for greater subregional nuclear cooperation in South Asia. Linking the regional agreement with South Asian environmental cooperation and marine pollution protection efforts could provide a framework for projects involving Indian and Pakistani coastal nuclear facilities. Programs of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations that use nuclear techniques to increase food and crop production and optimize water management in arid areas also provide similar opportunities for nuclear cooperation. Other frameworks for nuclear cooperation originate from international conventions related to nuclear safety, transportation of nuclear wastes, worker protection against ionizing radiation, and the nondeployment of nuclear weapons in certain areas. The information shared by existing frameworks includes: laws and regulations (including internal inspection procedures that enforce compliance); lists of nuclear facilities; emergency response procedures and available resources; information related to the transportation of nuclear wastes (particularly via shipping); understanding and notification of accidental releases; and radionuclide release data from select coastal facilities. Incremental increases in the sensitivity of the information being shared could strengthen norms for Indian and Pakistani nuclear transparency. This paper suggests seven technology-based Indian and Pakistani nuclear transparency projects for consideration. Existing nuclear-related agreements provide an information-sharing framework within which the projects could occur. Eventually, as confidence increases and new agreements are negotiated, future projects could begin to deal with the accounting of fissile materials and nuclear weapons disposition and control.

  11. Compliance with the Aerospace MACT Standard at Lockheed Martin

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kurucz, K.L.; Vicars, S.; Fetter, S.; Mueller, T.

    1997-12-31

    Actions taken and planned at four Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMC) facilities to comply with the Aerospace MACT Standard are reviewed. Many LMC sites have taken proactive steps to reduce emissions and implement low VOC coating technology. Significant administrative, facility, and material challenges remain to achieve compliance with the upcoming NESHAP and Control Technology Guideline (CTG) standards. The facilities discussed herein set up programs to develop and implement compliance strategies. These facilities manufacture military aircraft, missiles, satellites, rockets, and electronic guidance and communications systems. Some of the facilities are gearing up for new production lines subject to new source MACT standards. At this time the facilities are reviewing compliance status of all primers, topcoats, maskants and solvents subject to the standard. Facility personnel are searching for the most efficient methods of satisfying the recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring, sections of the standards while simultaneously preparing or reviewing their Title V permit applications. Facility decisions on paint booths are the next highest priority. Existing dry filter paint booths will be subject to the filtration standard for existing paint booths which requires the use of two-stage filters. Planned paint booths for the F-22 program, and other new booths must comply with the standard for new and rebuilt booths which requires three stage or HEPA filters. Facilities looking to replace existing water wash paint booths, and those required to retrofit the air handling equipment to accommodate the two-stage filters, are reviewing issues surrounding the rebuilt source definition.

  12. Technical Services Agreement

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    attached and incorporated herein. It is understood by the Parties that, except for the intellectual property provisions of this Agreement, NREL is obligated to comply with the...

  13. Power Purchase Agreement Webinars

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Provides a listing of past power purchase agreement webinars and associated files. Author: U. S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

  14. A GIS approach to cultural resources management and NEPA compliance

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Moeller, K.

    1996-06-01

    Cultural resources management and historic preservation compliance are best approached within the broader framework of natural resources planning and land management. Argonne National Laboratory is currently assisting federal agencies with the development of computer- based resource management systems for large facilities, and cultural resources management and preservation are components of these systems. In the area of cultural resources, Argonne is using the GIS tool to demonstrate how federal facilities can manage large, complex databases, integrate cultural resource data with other environmental variables, model distributions of resources to aid in inventory and evaluation, link the data to quantitative and impact modes, and effectively manage and monitor resource planning activities and environmental compliance.

  15. Boilerplate Settlement Agreement

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This agreement is entered into between Mr./Ms. ____________________ and the Department of Energy (DOE) to resolve the issue concerning ____________. The parties have participated in mediation and voluntarily agree that: 1. Mr./Ms. ___________________ shall __________________________________________. _____________________________________________________________________

  16. Environmental Compliance Issue Coordination

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1993-01-07

    To establish the Department of Energy (DOE) requirements for coordination of significant environmental compliance issues to ensure timely development and consistent application of Departmental environmental policy and guidance. Cancels DOE O 5400.2. Para. 5a(2) and 5a(7) canceled by DOE O 231.1.

  17. Coach Compliance Form

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Coach Compliance Form My team is participating in theNational Renewable Energy Laboratory's Lithium-Ion Battery Car Competition. I have reviewed the following documents with the participating students: o Safety Hazards of Batteries o Material Safety Data Sheet - Lithium Polymer Battery o Electric Battery Car Competition Rules ______________________________ ______________ Coach Signature Date Name of School: ____________________________________________ Name of Coach (Please Print):

  18. Environmental Compliance | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Compliance Environmental Compliance Federal environmental laws apply to DOE Loans and Loan Guarantees. The Loan Programs Office's (LPO's) Environmental Compliance Division is responsible for overseeing LPO's compliance with environmental laws applicable to LPO actions. These laws include: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) - requires DOE to consider the environmental effects of proposed actions to inform agency decisionmaking. Analyses and documentation prepared to comply with NEPA may

  19. II. GENERAL COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    II. GENERAL COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION The objectives of most compliance requirements for DOE programs are generic in nature. For example, most programs have eligibility requirements. While the criteria for determining eligibility vary by program, the objective of the compliance requirement that only eligible entities participate is consistent across all programs. Rather than repeat these compliance requirements, audit objectives, and suggested audit procedures for each program, they are

  20. DOE Cooperative Research and Development Agreements

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2011-01-12

    To establish Department of Energy (DOE) policy, requirements, and responsibilities for the oversight, management, and administration of Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) activities at DOE facilities. Admin Chg, dated 9-18-2013. Canceled by DOE O 483.1A.

  1. TENTATIVE AGREEMENT ON NEGOTIATIONS

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    and Consent Order (Tri- Party Agreement) M-034 and M-016 commitments for removal of sludge, debris, water and the K Basins. The M-016 commitments involve the removal of the...

  2. Voluntary Offer Safeguards Agreement and Additional Protocol with the International Atomic Energy Agency

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2006-12-15

    The Order defines requirements for Department of Energy (DOE) compliance with the Agreement between the United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the United States, the Protocol to the Agreement, the Additional Protocol to the Agreement, and the Subsidiary Arrangements to the Agreement and Additional Protocol. Cancels DOE O 142.2. Admin Chg 1, 6-27-13.

  3. Voluntary Offer Safeguards Agreement and Additional Protocol with the International Atomic Energy Agency

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2006-12-15

    The Order defines requirements for Department of Energy (DOE) compliance with the Agreement between the United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the United States, the Protocol to the Agreement, the Additional Protocol to the Agreement, and the Subsidiary Arrangements to the Agreement and Additional Protocol. Supersedes DOE O 142.2. Admin Chg 1, dated 6-27-13, Supersedes DOE O 142.1A. Certified 12-3-14.

  4. Tentative Agreement as it went to public comment.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Tentative Agreement on Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement) Negotiations on the Overall Strategy and Approach for Hanford Groundwater Protection, Monitoring and Remediation (Tri-Party Agreement Milestone Series M-024) The U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL), the State of Washington, Department of Ecology, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), hereinafter referred to as the parties, have concluded negotiations on an

  5. ARM - Facility News Article

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    March 31, 2008 [Facility News] Interagency Land Use Agreement Signed for North Slope of Alaska Bookmark and Share As scientific neighbors on Alaska's North Slope, the ARM site at Barrow operates between NOAA (right) and USGS (left) research facilities. Less than 1 km to the northwest, the shore of Elson Lagoon leads to the Arctic Ocean. After more than a year of discussions and negotiations, ARM has renewed its land use agreement with interagency partners to continue operations at its North

  6. Research License Agreement Template

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Research License Template RESEARCH LICENSE Between Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC And [COMPANY or UNIVERSITY NAME] This License Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), which shall be effective on the date it is executed by the last Party to sign (the "Effective Date"), is between Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC (hereinafter "Alliance"), Management and Operating Contractor for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (hereinafter "NREL") located at

  7. Material Transfer Agreements

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Material Transfer Agreements Material Transfer Agreements Enables the transfer of tangible consumable research materials between two organizations, when the recipient intends to use the material for research purposes Contact thumbnail of Marcus Lucero Head of Licensing Marcus Lucero Richard P. Feynman Center for Innovation (505) 665-6569 Email Overview The ability to exchange materials freely and without delay is an important part of a healthy scientific laboratory. Los Alamos National

  8. Compliance Certification Application

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Compliance Certification Application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Appendix PIC United States Department of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Carlsbad Area Office Carlsbad, New Mexico Passive Institutional Controls Conceptual Design Report PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT REVISION 0 MAY 14, 1996 1 C PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS DESIGN REPORT REVISION 0 PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT MAY 1 4 . 1 9 9 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . .

  9. - Compliance Recertification Application 2014

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    About | PDF Documents CRA-2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary Structure of the CRA-2014 Section 8: Approval Process for Waste Shipment From Waste Generator Sites for Disposal at the WIPP Section 15: Content of Compliance Recertification Application(s) Section 21: Inspections Section 22: Quality Assurance Section 23: Models and Computer Codes Section 24: Waste Characterization Section 25: Future State Assumptions Section 26: Expert Judgment Section 27: Peer Review Section 31: Application of

  10. ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rifle, Colorado Page 14-1 14.0 Rifle, Colorado, Disposal Site 14.1 Compliance Summary The Rifle, Colorado, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I Disposal Site was inspected on June 12, 2014. The disposal cell and all associated surface water diversion and drainage structures were in good condition and functioning as designed. Minor fence repairs will be conducted prior to the next inspection. Two signs on the evaporation pond need to be replaced. Inspectors identified no

  11. 2001 Annual Compliance Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Bluewater, New Mexico Page 1-1 1.0 Bluewater, New Mexico, Disposal Site 1.1 Compliance Summary The Bluewater, New Mexico, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title II Disposal Site was inspected on August 20 and 21, 2014. Several shallow depressions that exist on the main tailings disposal cell cover had ponded water at the time of the inspection; disposal cell performance is being evaluated to determine if additional monitoring or cover enhancement is necessary. Small elm tree

  12. 2001 Annual Compliance Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Shirley Basin South, Wyoming Page 6-1 6.0 Shirley Basin South, Wyoming, Disposal Site 6.1 Compliance Summary The Shirley Basin South, Wyoming, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title II Disposal Site was inspected on July 2, 2014. The disposal cell and all associated surface water diversion and drainage structures were in excellent condition and functioning as designed. Inspectors identified no maintenance needs or cause for a follow-up inspection. Groundwater monitoring

  13. DOE NEPA Compliance Officers

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    NEPA Compliance Officers Programs and Power Marketing Administrations are listed alphabetically by name, then NCO. Field Offices are listed alphabetically under their primary Program Office. Please send updates to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov Feb 24, 2016 Forrestal (FORS) Addresses: Germantown (GTN) Addresses: 1000 Independence Ave SW 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585-1290 . Use for U.S. Postal Service mail. 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Use for

  14. DOE Awards Cooperative Agreement for Innovative Electric Generation

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Facility with Pre-Combustion CO2 Capture and Storage | Department of Energy Cooperative Agreement for Innovative Electric Generation Facility with Pre-Combustion CO2 Capture and Storage DOE Awards Cooperative Agreement for Innovative Electric Generation Facility with Pre-Combustion CO2 Capture and Storage March 12, 2010 - 12:00pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has awarded a cooperative agreement to Summit Texas Clean Energy LLC (STCE) for the Texas Clean

  15. Technical Services Agreement

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    TSA-AGMT.DOC (9/06/01) 04/14/13 Technical Services Agreement No. TSA- The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (hereinafter "NREL") Operating under Prime Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 for the Department of Energy And <Sponsor>` (hereinafter "Sponsor") I. Parties to the Technical Services Agreement. The Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC as Management and Operating (M&O) Contractor for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory ("Contractor"), under U.S.

  16. Methods for verifying compliance with low-level radioactive waste acceptance criteria

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    NONE

    1993-09-01

    This report summarizes the methods that are currently employed and those that can be used to verify compliance with low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal facility waste acceptance criteria (WAC). This report presents the applicable regulations representing the Federal, State, and site-specific criteria for accepting LLW. Typical LLW generators are summarized, along with descriptions of their waste streams and final waste forms. General procedures and methods used by the LLW generators to verify compliance with the disposal facility WAC are presented. The report was written to provide an understanding of how a regulator could verify compliance with a LLW disposal facility`s WAC. A comprehensive study of the methodology used to verify waste generator compliance with the disposal facility WAC is presented in this report. The study involved compiling the relevant regulations to define the WAC, reviewing regulatory agency inspection programs, and summarizing waste verification technology and equipment. The results of the study indicate that waste generators conduct verification programs that include packaging, classification, characterization, and stabilization elements. The current LLW disposal facilities perform waste verification steps on incoming shipments. A model inspection and verification program, which includes an emphasis on the generator`s waste application documentation of their waste verification program, is recommended. The disposal facility verification procedures primarily involve the use of portable radiological survey instrumentation. The actual verification of generator compliance to the LLW disposal facility WAC is performed through a combination of incoming shipment checks and generator site audits.

  17. 2004 WIPP Compliance Recertification Application

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2004 WIPP Compliance Recertification Application DOE/WIPP 04-3231 March 2004 Content of the CRA As required by Title 40 CFR, Parts 191 and 194, the 2004 Compliance Recertification Application addresses a wide range of topics. It incorporates portions of the first Compliance Certification Application (CCA) and provides updates in those areas where approved changes occurred. It also presents new data and associated analyses. In addition, the appliacation responds to specific requests from EPA for

  18. Technical assessment of compliance with workplace air sampling requirements at WRAP

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    HACKWORTH, M.F.

    1999-06-02

    The purpose of this Technical Assessment is to satisfy HSRCM-1, ''Hanford Site Radiological Control Manual'' Article 551.4 for a documented study of facility Workplace Air Monitoring (WAM) programs. HSRCM-1 is the primary guidance for radiological control at Waste Management Federal Services of Hanford, Inc. (WMH). The HSRCM-1 complies with Title 10. Part 835 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10CFR835). This document provides an evaluation of the compliance of the Waste Receiving and Processing facility (WRAP) WAM program to the criteria standards, requirements, and documents compliance with the requirements where appropriate. Where necessary, it also indicates changes needed to bring specific locations into compliance.

  19. 2001 Annual Compliance Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    L-Bar, New Mexico Page 3-1 3.0 L-Bar, New Mexico, Disposal Site 3.1 Compliance Summary The L-Bar, New Mexico, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title II Disposal Site was inspected on August 19, 2014. The tailings impoundment was in excellent condition. Erosion and vegetation measurements to monitor the condition of the impoundment cover indicated that no erosion is occurring, and perennial vegetation foliar cover at the measurement plots continued to be substantially less

  20. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Westinghouse TRU Solutions

    2000-12-01

    This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents environmental regulatory compliance at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste, for the reporting period of April 1, 1998, to March 31, 2000. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA)(Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, and amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Area Office's (hereinafter the ''CAO'') compliance with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations implemented by agencies of the federal government and the state of New Mexico. An issue was identified in the 1998 BECR relating to a potential cross-connection between the fire-water systems and the site domestic water system. While the CAO and its managing and operating contractor (hereinafter the ''MOC'') believe the site was always in compliance with cross-connection control requirements, hardware and procedural upgrades w ere implemented in March 1999 to strengthen its compliance posture. Further discussion of this issue is presented in section 30.2.2 herein. During this reporting period WIPP received two letters and a compliance order alleging violation of certain requirements outlined in section 9(a)(1) of the LWA. With the exception of one item, pending a final decision by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), all alleged violations have been resolved without the assessment of fines or penalties. Non-mixed TRU waste shipments began on March 26, 1999. Shipments continued through November 26, 1999, the effective date of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (NM4890139088-TSDF). No shipments regulated under the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit were received at WIPP during this BECR reporting period.

  1. Postdoctoral Mentoring Agreement | Argonne National Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Agreement Agreement to participate in the Argonne Postdoctoral Mentoring Program. PDF icon Postdoctoral-Mentoring-Agreement

  2. Partnership Agreement Form

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Partnership Agreement Form Learn more at energy.gov/eere/amo/better-plants The Better Buildings, Better Plants Program is a national initiative to significantly improve energy efficiency across U.S. industry. Leading manufacturers in the program work to reduce energy intensity throughout all of their U.S. manufacturing operations by 25% over ten years. The Energy Department helps these industrial partners develop energy management plans and performance metrics, evaluate energy-saving

  3. Agreement Type Union

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Type Union Local #/Name Number of Employees Project Labor Agreement International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers 135 2 International Brothehood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmith Forgers and Helpers 92 0 International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen 13 0 Regional Council of Carpenters 1780 & 1977 13 Operative Plasterers and Cement Mason International Association Operative Plasterers and Cement Mason International Association 1

  4. PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE AGREEMENT

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    F PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE SEE ATTACHED Appendix F - Page 308 PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE AGREEMENT For value received, and in consideration of, and in order to induce the United States (the Government) to enter into Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 for the management and operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (the "Contract") dated __________, by and between the Government and Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC (Contractor), the undersigned, Bechtel National, Inc. (Guarantor),

  5. Non-Treaty Storage Agreement

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Doing Business Skip navigation links Initiatives Columbia River Treaty Non Treaty Storage Agreement 2012 Long Term NTSA Previous Agreements NEPA Planning and Review Documents...

  6. Attachment 2: Draft Settlement Agreement

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    made by the Parties in all prior discussions, negotiations and agreements, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. 11. DRAFTING OF THE...

  7. Laser Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Laser Facilities Current Schedule of Experiments Operation Schedule Janus Titan Europa COMET Facility Floorplan

  8. Environment and Compliance | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Environment and Compliance Environment and Compliance Environment and Compliance Offices of the Deputy General Counsel for Environment and Compliance Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Environment (GC-51) Office of the Assistant General Counsel for International and National Security Programs (GC-53) Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (GC-54) Office of the Assistant General Counsel General Law (GC-56) Litigation, Regulation and Enforcement Environment and Compliance Environment

  9. VPP Interagency Agreement Between DOE and DOL

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The purpose of thia agreement ie for the U. S. Department Of Labor's (DOL) Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Directorate of Federal-State Operation8 (FSO) to provide aeeistance to the U. S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Occupational safety (EH-31) in the development bf the DOE Voluntary Protection Program (DOE-WP) at Government-~ned-or-LeaBed Contractor-Operated (GOCO) facilities.

  10. Final Rocky Flats Cleanup Agreement, July 19, 1996 Summary

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Rocky Flats Cleanup Agreement State Colorado Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA/RCRA Scope Summary Establish the regulatory framework for achieving the ultimate cleanup of the Rocky Flats Site. Parties DOE; US EPA; The State of Colorado Date 7/19/1996 SCOPE * Establish the regulatory framework for achieving the ultimate cleanup of the Rocky Flats Site. * Ensure that the environmental impacts associated with activities at the Site will continue to be investigated and

  11. Microsoft Word - Short Form CRADA Agreement Boilerplate Approved June 2014

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    agreement, which is uniform across the Departmental facilities, for small value transactions. Except for minor modifications to the terms of this agreement made by CONTRACTOR, most changes will require approval by the DOE Contracting Officer, WHICH WILL LIKELY DELAY THE START DATE OF THE PROJECT. If substantive changes are required, the DOE Model CRADA may be more appropriate due to the increased flexibility such agreements afford. STEVENSON-WYDLER (15 U.S.C. 3710a) SHORT FORM COOPERATIVE

  12. Tri-Party Agreement for Energy Savings Performance Contracts | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Tri-Party Agreement for Energy Savings Performance Contracts Tri-Party Agreement for Energy Savings Performance Contracts Document outlines processes and considerations to help federal agencies begin planning a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) energy savings performance contract (ESPC). The tri-party agreement is for use by DOE sites and facilities that are government-owned, contractor-operated (GOCO). They can be modified to support any federal agencies that also may have GOCO

  13. DOE Cooperative Research and Development Agreements | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Cooperative Research and Development Agreements DOE Cooperative Research and Development Agreements To establish Department of Energy (DOE) policy, requirements, and responsibilities for the oversight, management, and administration of Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) activities at DOE facilities. PDF icon DOE O 483.1 More Documents & Publications DOE M 483.1-1 DOE Order 482.1 Acquisition Letter No. AL 2012-09

  14. Agreement to Mediate

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Washington, D.C. 20585 AGREEMENT TO MEDIATE We agree to engage in mediation in a good faith attempt to resolve our issues. We understand that the mediator's role is to assist us in reaching a resolution, that (s)he has no authority to decide the outcome of the mediation, and that (s)he will not act as an advocate for either of us. We understand that mediation is a confidential process and that the mediator will not discuss the mediation proceedings with anyone who was not present at the

  15. Master Software License Agreement

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    GE Global Research Software Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) License Terms and Conditions (01/2011) This Agreement (also referred to as "Order") is made by Licensor, a company whose address and primary contact information are contained on the face of the GE purchase order ("Order Document") to which these terms apply, and General Electric Company, a company organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, U.S.A., and acting through its GE Global Research

  16. Confidentiality Agreement | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Confidentiality Agreement Confidentiality Agreement This document sets out the ground rules for the confidentiality of the mediation session and is signed at the mediation session by all who are present. PDF icon OCPR-HQ-007 Final - Confidentiality Agreement.pdf More Documents & Publications Agreement to Mediate Mediation Process

  17. Nuclear Facilities Production Facilities

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Facilities Production Facilities Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Sand 2011-4582P. ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Gamma Irradiation Facility (GIF) The GIF provides test cells for the irradiation of experiments with high-intensity gamma ray sources. The main features

  18. NREL Technology Partnership Agreement Process

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NREL Technology Partnership Agreement Process NREL/Partner Discuss Project Proposal DOE Reviews and Approves Partner Sends Funds to NREL NREL/Partner Start Work NREL/Partner Manage Commitment NREL Determines if Project Meets Qualifications Parties Sign Agreement NREL/DOE Review. Negotiate as Needed. NREL/Partner Determine Agreement Type NREL/Partner Develop Statement of Work NREL Provides Draft Agreement For more information about the technology partnership agreement process, see the NREL

  19. Foundation for the future: International compliance initiatives by DOD

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Leonard, J.; Schlessman, D.C.

    1995-12-01

    Department of Defense installations and facilities operating in foreign nations have historically enjoyed an ambiguous environmental compliance posture. Faced with the confusion of differing compliance strategies among the U.S. military components outside the continental United States (OCONUS), Congress mandated that the Department of Defense (DOD) develop a consistent environmental compliance strategy for its operations OCONUS. That mandate is manifested in a new environmental policy for DOD components operating overseas, which is the subject of this study. Although the new DOD policy is comprehensive and establishes specific minimum environmental standards for components overseas, it also presented unforeseen challenges. This paper briefly describes the new DOD overseas environmental compliance strategy, and specifically explores the challenges and obstacles faced by the U.S. Army in Europe (USAREUR). As the Executive Agent responsible for developing the environmental {open_quotes}final governing standards{close_quotes} (FGS) for DOD components in Germany, USAREUR conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of the minimum DOD environmental compliance criteria with those of the host nation. While the concept of the new FGS is intended to provide the consistency formerly lacking among DOD components overseas, the challenges identified during the comparative analysis revealed distinct differences in the two system (i.e., U.S. vs. German) in providing environmental {open_quotes}standards{close_quotes} for compliance. This paper presents a synopsis of the findings and the challenges encountered during the comparative analysis, and provides a case example. Our experience will show that DOD`s attempt to institute an environmental compliance strategy based on standards that are {open_quotes}more protective{close_quotes} of human health and the environment, is not a simple matter of comparison between host nation laws and DOD criteria.

  20. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  1. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  2. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  3. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 3 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  4. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2014 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 4 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2014 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  5. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2015 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 5 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2015 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  6. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 09 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  7. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  8. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  9. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2013 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 3 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2013 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  10. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2014 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 4 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2014 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  11. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  12. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  13. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  14. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2013 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 3 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2013 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  15. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2014 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 4 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2014 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  16. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2015 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 5 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2015 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  17. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  18. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  19. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  20. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2013 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 3 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2013 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  1. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2014 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 4 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2014 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of

  2. Categorical Exclusion 4564, Sort and Segregation Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    and Guidelines OA 14- Approval of technical exchange arrangements OA IS - International umbrella agreements for energy R&D Facility Operations OB 1.2 - Training exercises and...

  3. WICF Certification, Compliance and Enforcement webinar

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This document is the presentation used from the WICF certification, compliance and enforcement webinar.

  4. Administrative Order Requiring Compliance and Assessing Civil Penalty

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Administrative Compliance Order No. HWB-14-20 (CO) Pursuant to the New Mexico Hazardous Waste Act ("HWA"), NMSA 1978, Sections 74-4-1 to -14, the Hazardous Waste Bureau ("HWB") of the Environmental Health Division ("Division") of the New Mexico Environmental Department ("NMED") issues this Administrative Compliance Order ("Order") to the United States Department of Energy ("DOE"), and Los Alamos National Security, LLC ("LANS"; collectively, with DOE, the "Respondents"), requiring the Respondents to comply with the terms and conditions of this Order relating to the Los Alamos National Laboratory ("LANL" or "Facility"), and assessing a civil penalty for violations of the HWA, the Hazardous Waste Management Regulations, 20.4.1 NMAC ("HWMR"), and the Facility Permit, EPA I.D. NUMBER NM0890010515-TSDF (Permit").

  5. COMPLIANCE STUDIES: WHAT ABOUT THE FISH?

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Woodley, Christa M.; Fischer, Eric S.; Wagner, Katie A.; Weiland, Mark A.; Eppard, M. B.; Carlson, Thomas J.

    2013-08-21

    ABSTRACT It is understood that operational and structural conditions at hydroelectric facilities along with environmental conditions of the migration corridors affect the passage conditions for fish. Hydropower fish survival assessments at the individual- and population-level have progressed over the past decade with development of turbine simulation software and improvements in telemetry systems, in particular, micro-transmitters, cabled and autonomous receivers, and advanced statistical designs that provide precise estimates of passage routes and dam-passage survival. However, these approaches often ignore fish condition as a variable in passage and survival analyses. To account for fish condition effects on survival results, compliance statistical models often require increased numbers of tagged fish. For example, prior to and during migration, fish encounter numerous stressors (e.g., disease, predation, contact with structures, decompression events), all of which can cause physical and physiological stress, altering the probability of survival after passage through a dam or a series of dams. In addition, the effects of surgical transmitter implantation process or the transmitter itself may cause physiological stress, alter behavior, and/or decrease survival. Careful physiological evaluations can augment survival model assumptions, resultant data, and predictive scenarios. To exemplify this, surgeons concurrently noted fish condition and surgical implantation during a multi-dam compliance study in 2011. The analyses indicted that surgeon observations on fish condition and surgical outcomes were related to 24 h holding mortalities and fish that never detected after release. Short reach and long reach survival were related to surgical outcomes and fish condition, respectively.

  6. 300 Area TEDF NPDES Permit Compliance Monitoring Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Loll, C.M.

    1994-10-13

    This monitoring plan describes the activities and methods that will be employed at the 300 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility (TEDF) in order to ensure compliance with the National Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Included in this document are a brief description of the project, the specifics of the sampling effort, including the physical location and frequency of sampling, the support required for sampling, and the Quality Assurance (QA) protocols to be followed in the sampling procedures.

  7. Microsoft PowerPoint - Managing Uncertainty and Demonstrating Compliance

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Uncertainty and Demonstrating Compliance Roger Seitz (SRNL) Performance and Risk Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange December 15, 2015 Introduction * Remediation activities and radioactive waste disposal facilities can go to great lengths to demonstrate safety * Designs and assessments address potential impacts for very long time frames relative to other human activities * Uncertainty is inherent in natural systems and long time frames, but it can be effectively managed to make

  8. DOE - NNSA/NFO -- Environmental Compliance

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Programs > Environmental Compliance NNSA/NFO Language Options U.S. DOE/NNSA - Nevada Field Office Click to subscribe to NNSS News Environmental Compliance and Occurrences Environmental Compliance photo All Nevada Field Office activities are conducted in accordance with federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies. These numerous environmental drivers govern how the Nevada Field Office protects the public and the environment during missions. Compliance Status The compliance status

  9. Creating a Partnership Agreement Worksheet

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Creating a Partnership Agreement Worksheet, as posted on the U.S. Department of Energy's Better Buildings Neighborhood Program website.

  10. NETLMemorandum of Understanding or Agreement

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Memorandum of Understanding or Agreement Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) OR Memorandums of Agreement (MOAs) are written agreements between NETL and other entities that state of scope of work for a specific project or state the terms of a partnering relationship. Parties to these agreements may include other federal agencies, local, state, international, or other government entities; the private sector; and educational institutions. An MOU or MOA is not considered a binding contract. It

  11. Requirements to coordinate agreements, milestones and decision...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    to coordinate agreements, milestones and decision documents (AMDD) Requirements to coordinate agreements, milestones and decision documents (AMDD) Environmental agreements,...

  12. Massachusetts State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Massachusetts State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Massachusetts State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE,...

  13. Connecticut State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Connecticut State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Connecticut State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE,...

  14. North Carolina State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    North Carolina State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement North Carolina State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between...

  15. ARM - SGP Central Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Central Facility SGP Related Links Virtual Tour Facilities and Instruments Central Facility Boundary Facility Extended Facility Intermediate Facility Radiometric Calibration...

  16. Grout treatment facility land disposal restriction management plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hendrickson, D.W.

    1991-04-04

    This document establishes management plans directed to result in the land disposal of grouted wastes at the Hanford Grout Facilities in compliance with Federal, State of Washington, and Department of Energy land disposal restrictions. 9 refs., 1 fig.

  17. ENVIRONMENTAL OVERSIGHT AND MONITORING AGREEMENT

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    OVERSIGHT AND MONITORING AGREEMENT (Agreement in Principle) Between the United States Department of Energy and the State of Idaho 1. This Agreement in Principle (Agreement) is voluntarily entered into by the United States Department of Energy (DOE), under the authority of 42 U.S.C. §71 01 et. seq., and the State of Idaho (State) under the authority of Article IV, Section S of the Idaho Constitution and Idaho Code § 39-10S. DOE's designated lead for purposes of this Agreement is the DOE's Idaho

  18. Weldon Spring Federal Facility Agreement, January 28, 1992

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  19. Mr. Todd Mullins Federal Facility Agreement Manager Kentucky...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... B-9 DOE held a two-day Industry Day workshop, including a site tour, with private industry and public economic development officials to determine the nature of private industry ...

  20. Federal Facility Agreement for the Laboratory for Energy-Related...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    appropriate response actions at LEHR Parties DOE; USEPA; California Department of Toxic Substances Control; Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board; California...

  1. Federal Facility Agreement for the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    are addressed to achieve comprehensive remediation of the site. * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring response...

  2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement, June 29, 1992

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  3. Mound Plant Federal Facility Agreement, July 15, 1993

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  4. Brookhaven National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement, February 28, 1992

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  5. Federal Facility Agreement for the Oak Ridge Reservation, January...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    a basis for a determination that the DOE has completed the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study(s), remedial design(s), and remedial action(s) at the Site pursuant to CERCLA...

  6. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR HANFORD FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT AND...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    by EPA. A group represents one or more TSD units and reflects the level at which a Part B application andor closure plan will be developed. These units range significantly...

  7. SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES NFE AGREEMENTS NON-FEDERAL ENTITY AGREEMENTS

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NATIONAL LABORATORIES NFE AGREEMENTS NON-FEDERAL ENTITY AGREEMENTS PURPOSE OF NFE AGREEMENTS To support its missions, Sandia National Laboratories' (SNL) engineers and scientists conduct research in many areas. Many of the technologies, processes, and special technical expertise they have developed have been applied to solving problems in the private sector through mutually beneficial, technology partnerships. A company working with SNL on such an endeavor is known as a non-Federal entity (NFE).

  8. Wheelabrator Sherman Energy Facility Biomass Facility | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Sherman Energy Facility Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Wheelabrator Sherman Energy Facility Biomass Facility Facility Wheelabrator Sherman Energy Facility Sector...

  9. Huntington Resource Recovery Facility Biomass Facility | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Resource Recovery Facility Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Huntington Resource Recovery Facility Biomass Facility Facility Huntington Resource Recovery Facility...

  10. Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance 2014 Building Technologies Office Peer Review Rosemarie Bartlett rosemarie.bartlett@pnnl.gov Pacific Northwest National Laboratory FY12 FY13 FY14 $3.9M $1.8M $1.8M Project Summary Timeline: Multi-year program in support of DOE statutory requirements Key Milestones: 1. REScheck Update Including Enhancements (Aug 2014) 2. 90.1-2013 Training Materials (Aug 2014) 3. Revised Compliance Methodology (Sept 2014) 4. 2015 IECC Training Materials (Dec 2014) 5.

  11. Unions, LANL sign labor agreements

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Unions, LANL sign labor agreements Unions, LANL sign labor agreements The New Mexico Building and Construction Trades Council and Los Alamos National Security LLC, announced the signing of a series of labor agreements that affect nearly 750 construction and maintenance workers. September 21, 2012 Jay Johnson renews the contracts with the Laboratory's union workers. Jay Johnson (left) associate director for maintenance and infrastructure planning, renews the contracts with the Laboratory's union

  12. Timesharing Agreements | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Timesharing Agreements Timesharing Agreements Time Sharing Agreements The Acquisition Management Division (IM-13) administers the Departmental Teleprocessing Services Program (TSP), to ensure: Reduced overhead costs Reduced rates and discounts Diversity of available resources The TSP currently saves the Department over $2.4M a year. For more information, please contact the TSP Coordinator, Diane McDonough diane.mcdonough@hq.doe.gov or Ann Edwards anna.edwards@hq.doe.gov. Congressional Quarterly,

  13. Facility configuration management: An approach to PSM/RMP compliance

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Melson, K.R. [Hurst Consulting, Inc., Angleton, TX (United States); Tagoe, C.C. [Occidental Chemical Corp., Pasadena, TX (United States); Souza, P.A. de [Tandem Technologies Group, Inc., Houston, TX (United States)

    1996-08-01

    New industry standards addressing Process Safety Management (PSM) and Risk Management Programs (RMP) specifically focus on the Management of Change (MOC) in chemical plants. The nuclear power industry has addressed this issue very strongly, since their regulations are even more stringent in MOC than the PSM and RMP standards. Although the nuclear industry is viewed by some as overly regulated, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the methods used in the nuclear industry to address the same types of requirements, and explore any advantages and lessons learned from the nuclear industry. Configuration Management programs are widely used in the nuclear industry to address MOC. When implemented properly, they have been found to be very effective in implementing site wide requirements, solving coordination problems, and increasing plant safety.

  14. NREL: Technology Transfer - Licensing Agreements

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    using, and selling of the licensed technology, methods, or products. 5. Negotiate License Language The company then reviews and comments on the license agreement draft. If needed,...

  15. Better Plants Partnership Agreement Form

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Better Buildings, Better Plants Partnership Agreement Form commits organizations to work with DOE to reduce energy intensity by 25% over ten years.

  16. Interconnection Agreements for Onsite Generation

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation covers Interconnection Agreements for Onsite Generation and is given at the Spring 2011 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting.

  17. NREL: Technology Transfer - Nondisclosure Agreements

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    established this process to develop mutually beneficial R&D collaborations in a straightforward, flexible, timely, and efficient manner. Process The nondisclosure agreement...

  18. DWPF waste form compliance plan (Draft Revision)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Plodinec, M.J.; Marra, S.L.

    1991-01-01

    The Department of Energy currently has over 100 million liters of high-level radioactive waste in storage at the Savannah River Site (SRS). In the late 1970's, the Department of Energy recognized that there were significant safety and cost advantages associated with immobilizing the high-level waste in a stable solid form. Several alternative waste forms were evaluated in terms of product quality and reliability of fabrication. This evaluation led to a decision to build the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) at SRS to convert the easily dispersed liquid waste to borosilicate glass. In accordance with the NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) process, an Environmental Impact Statement was prepared for the facility, as well as an Environmental Assessment of the alternative waste forms, and issuance of a Record of Decision (in December, 1982) on the waste form. The Department of Energy, recognizing that start-up of the DWPF would considerably precede licensing of a repository, instituted a Waste Acceptance Process to ensure that these canistered waste forms would be acceptable for eventual disposal at a federal repository. This report is a revision of the DWPF compliance plan.

  19. DWPF waste form compliance plan (Draft Revision)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Plodinec, M.J.; Marra, S.L.

    1991-12-31

    The Department of Energy currently has over 100 million liters of high-level radioactive waste in storage at the Savannah River Site (SRS). In the late 1970`s, the Department of Energy recognized that there were significant safety and cost advantages associated with immobilizing the high-level waste in a stable solid form. Several alternative waste forms were evaluated in terms of product quality and reliability of fabrication. This evaluation led to a decision to build the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) at SRS to convert the easily dispersed liquid waste to borosilicate glass. In accordance with the NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) process, an Environmental Impact Statement was prepared for the facility, as well as an Environmental Assessment of the alternative waste forms, and issuance of a Record of Decision (in December, 1982) on the waste form. The Department of Energy, recognizing that start-up of the DWPF would considerably precede licensing of a repository, instituted a Waste Acceptance Process to ensure that these canistered waste forms would be acceptable for eventual disposal at a federal repository. This report is a revision of the DWPF compliance plan.

  20. Byron Extended Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Byron Extended Facility Map

  1. Ashton Extended Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Ashton Extended Facility Map

  2. Microsoft Word - Template_SLAC Proprietary Use Agreement_PU 11_14_13

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    PU 11/14/2013 1 The Department of Energy has opted to utilize the following agreement for Designated Proprietary User Facilities transactions. Because these transactions are widespread across Departmental facilities, uniformity in agreement terms is desirable. Except for the *** provisions, minor modifications to the terms of this agreement may be made by CONTRACTOR, but any changes to the *** provisions or substantive changes to the non *** provisons will require approval by the DOE Contracting

  3. Mobile Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2009-2010 Shouxian, China, 2008 Black Forest, Germany, 2007 Niamey, Niger, 2006 Point Reyes, California, 2005 Mobile Facilities Pictured here in Gan, the second mobile facility...

  4. certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    regulations for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (CRE) certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (CRE) The current ...

  5. Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2014 Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2014 Report ii This Page Intentionally Left Blank Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2014 Report iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO, formerly Nevada Site Office), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations

  6. Environment and Compliance | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Environment and Compliance Environment and Compliance Cooling Tower Reflection | Credit: DOE Archives Cooling Tower Reflection | Credit: DOE Archives Offices of the Deputy General Counsel for Environment and Compliance Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Environment (GC-51) Office of the Assistant General Counsel for International and National Security Programs (GC-53) Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (GC-54) Office of the Assistant General Counsel General Law (GC-56) Litigation,

  7. Loan Loss Reserve Agreement | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Loan Loss Reserve Agreement Loan Loss Reserve Agreement Loan Loss Reserve Agreement, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP). PDF icon B2 Loan Loss Reserve Agreement.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Efficiency Loan Program Agreement Template Energy Efficiency Loan Program Agreement-Template Energy Efficiency Loan Program Agreement Template

  8. Idaho Waste Vitrification Facilities Project Vitrified Waste Interim Storage Facility

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bonnema, Bruce Edward

    2001-09-01

    This feasibility study report presents a draft design of the Vitrified Waste Interim Storage Facility (VWISF), which is one of three subprojects of the Idaho Waste Vitrification Facilities (IWVF) project. The primary goal of the IWVF project is to design and construct a treatment process system that will vitrify the sodium-bearing waste (SBW) to a final waste form. The project will consist of three subprojects that include the Waste Collection Tanks Facility, the Waste Vitrification Facility (WVF), and the VWISF. The Waste Collection Tanks Facility will provide for waste collection, feed mixing, and surge storage for SBW and newly generated liquid waste from ongoing operations at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center. The WVF will contain the vitrification process that will mix the waste with glass-forming chemicals or frit and turn the waste into glass. The VWISF will provide a shielded storage facility for the glass until the waste can be disposed at either the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant as mixed transuranic waste or at the future national geological repository as high-level waste glass, pending the outcome of a Waste Incidental to Reprocessing determination, which is currently in progress. A secondary goal is to provide a facility that can be easily modified later to accommodate storage of the vitrified high-level waste calcine. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of the VWISF, which would be constructed in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws. This project supports the Department of Energy’s Environmental Management missions of safely storing and treating radioactive wastes as well as meeting Federal Facility Compliance commitments made to the State of Idaho.

  9. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Washinton TRU Solutions LLC

    2002-09-30

    This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents environmental regulatory compliance at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste, for the reporting period of April 1, 2000, to March 31, 2002. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA)(Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, as amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office's (CBFO) compliance with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations implemented by agencies of the federal government and the state of New Mexico. In the prior BECR, the CBFO and the management and operating contractor (MOC)committed to discuss resolution of a Letter of Violation that had been issued by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) in August 1999, which was during the previous BECR reporting period. This Letter of Violation alleged noncompliance with hazardous waste aisle spacing, labeling, a nd tank requirements. At the time of publication of the prior BECR, resolution of the Letter of Violation was pending. On July 7, 2000, the NMED issued a letter noting that the aisle spacing and labeling concerns had been adequately addressed and that they were rescinding the violation alleging that the Exhaust Shaft Catch Basin failed to comply with the requirements for a hazardous waste tank. During the current reporting period, WIPP received a Notice of Violation and a compliance order alleging the violation of the New Mexico Hazardous Waste Regulations and the WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (HWFP).

  10. Energy Efficiency Loan Program Agreement Template | Department...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy Efficiency Loan Program Agreement Template Energy Efficiency Loan Program Agreement Template An agreement demonstrating how to address the deposit and use of the loan loss...

  11. Technology Investment Agreements | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Technology Investment Agreements Technology Investment Agreements Guidance Policy Flash 2006-31 - Technology Investment Agreements Financial Assistance Letter 2006-03 - Guidance...

  12. Tri-Party Agreement - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Agreement Tri-Party Agreement The Agreement Announcements List of Approved Changes TPA Project Manager's Lists Modifications for Public Comment Data Management MP-14 WIDS...

  13. NREL Bilateral Nondisclosure Agreement - Sample

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    REV 07/09) Page 1 of 3 BILATERAL NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT No. XX - XXXX ("Agreement") This Agreement is entered into by and between the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC ("Alliance"), the Manager and Operator of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory ("NREL") under Prime Contract No. DE- AC36-08GO28308 for the U.S. Department of Energy (the "DOE"), located at 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO, 80401 and COMPANY NAME ("Company"), whose

  14. Facility Representatives

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2011-03-01

    This standard, DOE-STD-1063, Facility Representatives, defines the duties, responsibilities and qualifications for Department of Energy (DOE) Facility Representatives, based on facility hazard classification; risks to workers, the public, and the environment; and the operational activity level. This standard provides the guidance necessary to ensure that DOE’s hazardous nuclear and non-nuclear facilities have sufficient staffing of technically qualified facility representatives (FRs) to provide day-to-day oversight of contractor operations.

  15. ALCF Acknowledgment Policy | Argonne Leadership Computing Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ALCF Acknowledgment Policy As a U.S. Department of Energy user facility dedicated to the advancement of scientific discoveries, the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility (ALCF) provides unique computing resources and expertise to a user community that is bound by certain policies designed to acknowledge and promote the work of others as well as the resources used to accomplish this work. The ALCF requests your continued compliance with the terms of your program or discretionary award,

  16. DOE and State Sign Natural Resources Damages Settlement Agreement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Officials from TDEC and DOE signed a Natural Resources Damages settlement agreement. The signed document designates DOE’s plans to compensate the state for ecological and human use impacts associated with contaminant releases from facilities at the Oak Ridge Reservation.

  17. Use of acceptable knowledge to demonstrate TRAMPAC compliance

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Whitworth, J. (Julia); Becker, B. (Blair); Guerin, D. (David); Shokes, T. (Tamara)

    2004-01-01

    Recently, Los Alamos National Laboratory-Carlsbad Operations (LANL-CO) has supported the Central Characterization Project (CCP) managed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in the shipment of transuranic (TRU) waste from various small-quantity TRU waste generators to hub sites or other DOE sites in TRUPACT-II shipping containers. This support has involved using acceptable knowledge (AK) to demonstrate compliance with various requirements of Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-II Authorized Methods of Payload Compliance (TRAMPAC). LANL-CO has worked to facilitate TRUPACT-II shipments from the University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) and Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute (LRRI) to Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E) and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), respectively. The latter two sites have TRU waste certification programs approved to ship waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for disposal. In each case, AK was used to satisfy the necessary information to ship the waste to other DOE facilities. For the purposes of intersite shipment, AK provided data to WIPP Waste Information System (WWIS) transportation modules to ensure that required information was obtained prior to TRUPACT-II shipments. The WWIS modules were used for the intersite shipments, not to enter certification data into WWIS, but rather to take advantage of a validated system to ensure that the containers to be shipped were compliant with TRAMPAC requirements, particularly in the evaluation of quantitative criteria. LANL-CO also assisted with a TRAMPAC compliance demonstration for homogeneous waste containers shipped in TRUPACT-II containers from ANL-E to Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) for the purpose of core sampling. The basis for the TRAMPAC compliance determinations was AK regarding radiological composition, chemical composition, TRU waste container packaging, and absence of prohibited items. Also, even in the case where AK is not used to fully demonstrate TRAMPAC compliance, it may be used to identify problem areas for shippability of different waste streams. An example is the case of Pu-238-contaminated waste from the Savannah River Site that had a low probability of meeting decay heat limits and aspiration times due to several factors including large numbers of confinement layers. This paper will outline 17 TRAMPAC compliance criteria assessed and the types of information used to show compliance with all criteria other than dose rate and container weight, which are normally easily measured at load preparation.

  18. Master Safeguards and Security Agreements

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1988-02-03

    To establish the Department of Energy policy, requirements, responsibilities, and authorities for the development and implementation of Master Safeguards and Security Agreements (MSSA's). Does not cancel another directive. Canceled by DOE O 5630.13A

  19. Facility effluent monitoring plan for WESF

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    SIMMONS, F.M.

    1999-09-01

    The FEMP for the Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) provides sufficient information on the WESF effluent characteristics and the effluent monitoring systems so that a compliance assessment against applicable requirements may be performed. Radioactive and hazardous material source terms are related to specific effluent streams that are in turn, related to discharge points and, finally are compared to the effluent monitoring system capability.

  20. NETL Partnership and Licensing Agreements

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Partnerships and Licensing Options Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) A CRADA allows for joint research projects between NETL and either public or private entities. Small businesses are given preferential consideration for the agreements. Intellectual property ownership is defined and cost sharing is essential. Intellectual Property (IP) License An Intellectual Property License transfers NETL-owned IP from government sector to private sector ownership both exclusively and

  1. Sample Retention Incentive Service Agreement

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    : Phased Retirement Service Agreement Introduction This is an employment agreement between ____(employee's name)_____ (hereinafter referred to as "you" or "your") and the ______(Departmental element)________ (hereinafter referred to as "the employer" or Departmental element) for the purpose of the employer committing to retaining you in a phased retirement status to fulfill a critical need and, in return, your committing to a period of service to the employer. This

  2. Minnesota State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Minnesota State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Minnesota State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_mn

  3. Tennessee State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Tennessee State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Tennessee State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_tn

  4. SAMPLE MODEL AGREEMENT ? NOT FOR EXECUTION

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    MODEL AGREEMENT - NOT FOR EXECUTION 5211 Template start-up option 1 of 8 OPTION AGREEMENT This option agreement (the "Agreement") is made by and is effective as of the date of...

  5. United States Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Environmental Compliance Handbook. Third edition

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-03-01

    The Environment, Safety & Health Division (ESHD) of the Nevada Operations Office has prepared this Environmental Compliance Handbook for all users of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and other US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) facilities. The Handbook gives an overview of the important environmental laws and regulations that apply to the activities conducted by the Nevada Operations Office and other users of DOE/NV facilities in Nevada.

  6. New Hampshire State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Documents & Publications Illinois State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Prototype Programmatic Agreement Between DOE, State Energy Offices, and State Historic...

  7. Intellectual Property Provisions (CSB-115) Cooperative Agreement...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    15) Cooperative Agreement Research, Development, or Demonstration Domestic Small Business Intellectual Property Provisions (CSB-115) Cooperative Agreement Research, Development, or...

  8. Intellectual Property Provisions (CLB-115) Cooperative Agreement...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Agreement Research, Development, or Demonstration Large Business and Foreign Entity Intellectual Property Provisions (CLB-115) Cooperative Agreement Research, Development, or...

  9. NREL: Technology Transfer - Technology Partnership Agreements

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Ombuds. Printable Version Technology Transfer Home About Technology Transfer Technology Partnership Agreements Agreements for Commercializing Technology CRADAs Work for...

  10. South Carolina State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    More Documents & Publications New Hampshire State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Illinois State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement North Carolina...

  11. Connecticut State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Connecticut State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Connecticut State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_ct.pdf More Documents & Publications Connecticut State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Delaware State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Florida State Historic

  12. New Hampshire State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy New Hampshire State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement New Hampshire State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_nh.pdf More Documents & Publications Illinois State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Prototype Programmatic Agreement Between DOE, State Energy Offices, and

  13. South Carolina State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Carolina State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement South Carolina State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_sc.pdf More Documents & Publications New Hampshire State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Illinois State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement North

  14. South Dakota State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Dakota State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement South Dakota State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_sd.pdf More Documents & Publications Washington State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Indiana State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement New Hampshire

  15. North Carolina State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy North Carolina State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement North Carolina State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_nc.pdf More Documents & Publications Indiana State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement South Dakota State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement

  16. Washington State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Washington State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Washington State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_wa.pdf More Documents & Publications Kansas State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement South Dakota State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Utah State Historic

  17. Wisconsin State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Wisconsin State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Wisconsin State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_wi.pdf More Documents & Publications Prototype Programmatic Agreement Between DOE, State Energy Offices, and State Historic Preservation Offices PROTOTYPE PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

  18. Louisiana State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Louisiana State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Louisiana State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_la.pdf More Documents & Publications Delaware State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Florida State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Massachusetts

  19. Massachusetts State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Massachusetts State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Massachusetts State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_ma.pdf More Documents & Publications Delaware State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Florida State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Louisiana

  20. Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_pa.pdf More Documents & Publications Delaware State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Florida State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Louisiana State

  1. International technology exchange in support of the Defense Waste Processing Facility wasteform production

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kitchen, B.G.

    1989-08-23

    The nearly completed Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) is a Department of Energy (DOE) facility at the Savannah River Site that is designed to immobilize defense high level radioactive waste (HLW) by vitrification in borosilicate glass and containment in stainless steel canisters suitable for storage in the future DOE HLW repository. The DWPF is expected to start cold operation later this year (1990), and will be the first full scale vitrification facility operating in the United States, and the largest in the world. The DOE has been coordinating technology transfer and exchange on issues relating to HLW treatment and disposal through bi-lateral agreements with several nations. For the nearly fifteen years of the vitrification program at Savannah River Laboratory, over two hundred exchanges have been conducted with a dozen international agencies involving about five-hundred foreign national specialists. These international exchanges have been beneficial to the DOE`s waste management efforts through confirmation of the choice of the waste form, enhanced understanding of melter operating phenomena, support for paths forward in political/regulatory arenas, confirmation of costs for waste form compliance programs, and establishing the need for enhancements of melter facility designs. This paper will compare designs and schedules of the international vitrification programs, and will discuss technical areas where the exchanges have provided data that have confirmed and aided US research and development efforts, impacted the design of the DWPF and guided the planning for regulatory interaction and product acceptance.

  2. International technology exchange in support of the Defense Waste Processing Facility wasteform production

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kitchen, B.G.

    1989-08-23

    The nearly completed Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) is a Department of Energy (DOE) facility at the Savannah River Site that is designed to immobilize defense high level radioactive waste (HLW) by vitrification in borosilicate glass and containment in stainless steel canisters suitable for storage in the future DOE HLW repository. The DWPF is expected to start cold operation later this year (1990), and will be the first full scale vitrification facility operating in the United States, and the largest in the world. The DOE has been coordinating technology transfer and exchange on issues relating to HLW treatment and disposal through bi-lateral agreements with several nations. For the nearly fifteen years of the vitrification program at Savannah River Laboratory, over two hundred exchanges have been conducted with a dozen international agencies involving about five-hundred foreign national specialists. These international exchanges have been beneficial to the DOE's waste management efforts through confirmation of the choice of the waste form, enhanced understanding of melter operating phenomena, support for paths forward in political/regulatory arenas, confirmation of costs for waste form compliance programs, and establishing the need for enhancements of melter facility designs. This paper will compare designs and schedules of the international vitrification programs, and will discuss technical areas where the exchanges have provided data that have confirmed and aided US research and development efforts, impacted the design of the DWPF and guided the planning for regulatory interaction and product acceptance.

  3. Acknowledging User Facilities | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC...

    Office of Science (SC) Website

    Models User Agreements Data Management Resources Acknowledging User Facilities User Statistics Policies and Processes Science Highlights Frequently Asked Questions Contact...

  4. Facility Safety

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1996-10-24

    Establishes facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation.

  5. Facility Safety

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1995-11-16

    Establishes facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation.

  6. ORISE: Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ORISE Facilities Unique laboratories and training centers among the assets managed on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) is home to a number of on- and off-site facilities that support the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) science education and research mission. From on-site medical laboratories to radiation emergency medicine training facilities, ORISE facilities are helping to address national needs in the following areas:

  7. Science Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Facilities /science-innovation/_assets/images/icon-science.jpg Science Facilities The focal point for basic and applied R&D programs with a primary focus on energy but also encompassing medical, biotechnology, high-energy physics, and advanced scientific computing programs. Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies» Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility (DARHT)» Electron Microscopy Lab» Ion Beam Materials Lab» Isotope Production Facility» Los Alamos Neutron Science Center»

  8. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services

    2006-10-12

    This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents compliance with environmental regulations at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed and authorized for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste. This BECR covers the reporting period from April 1, 2004, to March 31, 2006. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) (Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, as amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE) compliance with regulations and permits issued pursuant to the following: (1) Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 191, Subpart A, "Environmental Standards for Management and Storage"; (2) Clean Air Act (CAA) (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] §7401, et seq.); (3) Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) (42 U.S.C. §§6901-6992, et seq.); (4) Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) (42 U.S.C. §§300f, et seq.); (5) Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) (15 U.S.C. §§2601, et seq.); (6) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §§9601, et seq.); and all other federal and state of New Mexico laws pertaining to public health and safety or the environment.

  9. certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Refrigeration Equipment (CRE) | Department of Energy certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (CRE) certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (CRE) The current certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (CRE) "simply makes no sense". The regulations define the basic model as any product that has a different energy use or efficiency

  10. ATVM ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE ATVM ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE ATVM ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Various federal environmental laws apply to DOE loans and loan guarantees, including ATVM direct loans. These laws include: NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires DOE to consider the environmental effects of proposed actions to inform agency decision making. Analyses and documentation prepared to comply with NEPA may include a Categorical Exclusion,

  11. Compliance & Risk Assessment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Compliance & Risk Assessment Compliance & Risk Assessment PPPO scientists work to identify, analyze, and mitigate environmental hazards and risks to protect human health and safety and the environment. PPPO works proactively with state and federal regulatory agencies to ensure safe, effective, and compliant cleanup at the Sites. Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Agencies.png PPPO works with multiple regulatory agencies that promote safety and environmental quality regionally and

  12. TITLE XVII ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE TITLE XVII ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE TITLE XVII ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Various federal environmental laws apply to DOE loans and loan guarantees, including Title XVII loan guarantees. These laws include: NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires DOE to consider the environmental effects of proposed actions to inform agency decision making. Analyses and documentation prepared to comply with NEPA may include a

  13. Review of the Physical Science Facility Stack Air Sampling Probe Locations

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Glissmeyer, John A.

    2007-09-30

    This letter report reviews compliance of the current design of the Physical Science Facility (PSF) stack air sampling locations with the ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999 standard. The review was based on performance criteria used for locating air sampling probes, the design documents provided and available information on systems previously tested for compliance with the criteria. Recommendations are presented for ways to bring the design into compliance with the requirements for the sampling probe placement.

  14. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Waste Compliance Order, August 21, 1997 Summary

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    7-08-21-02 State Colorado Agreement Type Consent Order Legal Driver(s) RCRA Scope Summary Establish compliance requirements and schedules for the implementation of a "Waste Chemical Project Plan" Parties DOE; Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC; Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Date 8/21/1997 SCOPE * Establish compliance requirements and schedules for the implementation of a "Waste Chemical Project Plan" (the "Waste Chemical Plan") at RFETS. * Resolve

  15. Implications of Scheduled ITC Reversion for RPS Compliance: Preliminary Results

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lowder, Travis; Miller, John; O'Shaughnessy, Eric; Heeter, Jenny

    2015-09-14

    This poster presents DRAFT initial results of a forthcoming NREL analysis. The analysis investigates the impacts of the scheduled investment tax credit (ITC) reversion from 30 percent to 10 percent for certain solar photovoltaic projects. Specifically, it considers whether the reversion will result in increased use of alternative compliance payments (ACPs) in lieu of solar renewable energy credits (SRECs) for renewable portfolio standard (RPS) compliance. The analysis models the effect of a 10 percent ITC on power purchase agreement (PPA) prices for non-residential systems in the eight states with solar carve-outs and solar ACPs. Our preliminary results suggest that states will likely install sufficient capacity to meet long-term targets through SRECs rather than ACPs following the ITC reversion. However, the analysis shows that the ITC reversion could affect project economics such that capacity shortfalls in certain states could temporarily increase the use of ACPs. NREL anticipates publishing a full report of this analysis in fall 2015. credits (SRECs) for renewable portfolio standard (RPS) compliance. The analysis models the effect of a 10 percent ITC on power purchase agreement (PPA) prices for non-residential systems in the eight states with solar carve-outs and solar ACPs. Our preliminary results suggest that states will likely install sufficient capacity to meet long-term targets through SRECs rather than ACPs following the ITC reversion. However, the analysis shows that the ITC reversion could affect project economics such that capacity shortfalls in certain states could temporarily increase the use of ACPs. NREL anticipates publishing a full report of this analysis in fall 2015.

  16. Section 55: Results of Compliance Assessments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DOE 1997b), and Supplemental Summary of EPA-Mandated Performance Assessment Verification Test (All Replicates) and Comparison with the Compliance Certification Application...

  17. Compliance Certification Enforcement | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    commercial and industrial equipment deliver the energy and cost savings required by law. ... provide the government with information demonstrating compliance with United States law. ...

  18. Arçelik A.?: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Compliance Determination after test results revealed that Arçelik's Blomberg BRFB1450 refrigerator-freezer complies with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  19. FERC Compliance Handbook | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: FERC Compliance HandbookPermittingRegulatory GuidanceGuideHandbook...

  20. Point of Compliance | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Generic Technical Issue Discussion on Point of Compliance More Documents & Publications Long-Term Grout Performance Concentration Averaging Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis...

  1. FAQS Reference Guide – Environmental Compliance

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This reference guide addresses the competency statements in the June 2011 edition of DOE-STD-1156-2011, Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard.

  2. WNR Group Leader Steve Wender LANSCE Neutron Testing Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    on user facility agreements and payment terms for industrial users, contact: Technology Transfer Division 505.665.9090 Accelerated Neutron Testing of Semiconductors Los...

  3. Wheelabrator Millbury Facility Biomass Facility | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Facility Facility Wheelabrator Millbury Facility Sector Biomass Facility Type Municipal Solid Waste Location Worcester County, Massachusetts Coordinates 42.4096528, -71.8571331...

  4. Historic Preservation - Executed Programmatic Agreements | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy Historic Preservation - Executed Programmatic Agreements Historic Preservation - Executed Programmatic Agreements Programmatic Agreements offer a more streamlined process for grantees to satisfy their historic preservation requirements with minimum or no consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer based on the type of activity that is being undertaken. Below please find state-specific executed Programmatic Agreements. Executed agreements will apply to counties,

  5. Whistleblower Protection and Nondisclosure Agreements | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Whistleblower Protection and Nondisclosure Agreements Whistleblower Protection and Nondisclosure Agreements Important Notice Concerning Nondisclosure Acknowledgments or Agreements (NDAs) with the Department of Energy: Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 Required Statement Regarding Nondisclosure Agreements: Pursuant to the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012, the following statement applies to every nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement of the Government

  6. Technology Investment Agreements | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Technology Investment Agreements Technology Investment Agreements Guidance Policy Flash 2006-31 - Technology Investment Agreements Financial Assistance Letter 2006-03 - Guidance for Awarding Technology Investment Agreements Final Rule - Financial Assistance Regulations - Technology Investment Agreements Templates Company Template (Expenditure-Based) Consortium Template (Expenditure-Based) Company Template (Fixed Support) Consortium Support (Fixed Support) Training Technology Investment

  7. 2009 Performance Assessment for the Saltstone Disposal Facility |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Performance Assessment for the Saltstone Disposal Facility 2009 Performance Assessment for the Saltstone Disposal Facility This Performance Assessment (PA) for the Savannah River Site (SRS) was prepared to support the operation and eventual closure of the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF). This PA was prepared to demonstrate compliance with the pertinent requirements of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1, Change 1, Radioactive Waste Management,

  8. DOE Signs Cooperative Agreement for New Hydrogen Power Plant | Department

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    of Energy New Hydrogen Power Plant DOE Signs Cooperative Agreement for New Hydrogen Power Plant November 6, 2009 - 12:00pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has signed a cooperative agreement with Hydrogen Energy California LLC (HECA) to build and demonstrate a hydrogen-powered electric generating facility, complete with carbon capture and storage, in Kern County, Calif. The new plant is a step toward commercialization of a clean technology that enables use of

  9. 300 Area dangerous waste tank management system: Compliance plan approach. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-03-01

    In its Dec. 5, 1989 letter to DOE-Richland (DOE-RL) Operations, the Washington State Dept. of Ecology requested that DOE-RL prepare ``a plant evaluating alternatives for storage and/or treatment of hazardous waste in the 300 Area...``. This document, prepared in response to that letter, presents the proposed approach to compliance of the 300 Area with the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and Washington State`s Chapter 173-303 WAC, Dangerous Waste Regulations. It also contains 10 appendices which were developed as bases for preparing the compliance plan approach. It refers to the Radioactive Liquid Waste System facilities and to the radioactive mixed waste.

  10. Management initiatives to waste management decisions and environmental compliance in Oak Ridge, Tennessee

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Jones, C.G.

    1988-01-01

    Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. (MMES) has been the operating contractor for the nuclear production and research facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Paducah, Kentucky for about four and one-half years. Environmental compliance, regulatory interaction, and public confidence have been very significant issues during this time. This presentation will review the environmental situation in Oak Ridge in 1984 and will discuss management initiatives and experience in the development and implementation of effective environmental and waste management and health and safety programs committed to the protection of the environment, our workers and the public with an overall goal of full compliance with all current and anticipated regulations.

  11. Site maps and facilities listings

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-11-01

    In September 1989, a Memorandum of Agreement among DOE offices regarding the environmental management of DOE facilities was signed by appropriate Assistant Secretaries and Directors. This Memorandum of Agreement established the criteria for EM line responsibility. It stated that EM would be responsible for all DOE facilities, operations, or sites (1) that have been assigned to DOE for environmental restoration and serve or will serve no future production need; (2) that are used for the storage, treatment, or disposal of hazardous, radioactive, and mixed hazardous waste materials that have been properly characterized, packaged, and labelled, but are not used for production; (3) that have been formally transferred to EM by another DOE office for the purpose of environmental restoration and the eventual return to service as a DOE production facility; or (4) that are used exclusively for long-term storage of DOE waste material and are not actively used for production, with the exception of facilities, operations, or sites under the direction of the DOE Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. As part of the implementation of the Memorandum of Agreement, Field Offices within DOE submitted their listings of facilities, systems, operation, and sites for which EM would have line responsibility. It is intended that EM facility listings will be revised on a yearly basis so that managers at all levels will have a valid reference for the planning, programming, budgeting and execution of EM activities.

  12. Agreement to Mediate | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Agreement to Mediate Form PDF icon Agreement to Mediate More Documents & Publications C:\WINDOWS\Temp\agreementtomediate.PDF&#0; Boilerplate Settlement Agreement jrevSETTLEMENT0105.PDF&#0;

  13. Boilerplate Settlement Agreement | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Settlement Agreement form PDF icon Boilerplate Settlement Agreement More Documents & Publications jrevSETTLEMENT0105.PDF&#0; Agreement to Mediate C:\WINDOWS\Temp\agreementtomediate.PDF&#0;

  14. Beamlines & Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Imaging Group: Beamlines The X-ray Micrscopy and Imaging Group operates several beamlines and facilities. The bending magnet beamline (2-BM) entertaines 2 general user programs in...

  15. Davis-Bacon Compliance and Performance | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Davis-Bacon Compliance and Performance Davis-Bacon Compliance and Performance PDF icon Davis-Bacon Compliance and Performance More Documents & Publications DOE Order 350.3 CHAPTER...

  16. Contract and Agreement Templates | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Contract and Agreement Templates Contract and Agreement Templates Here you will find templates for a request for proposals (RFP), loan loss reserve (LLR) fund agreement, and energy efficiency loan program agreement, as well as sample documents and a sample guide for designing a residential financing program. The RFP, LLR agreement, and energy efficiency loan program agreement are vital for developing a clean energy financing program with an LLR. As a state or local government, you will typically

  17. Approaches used for Clearance of Lands from Nuclear Facilities among Several Countries: Evaluation for Regulatory Input

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The study entitled, “Approaches used for Clearance of Lands from Nuclear Facilities among Several Countries: Evaluation for Regulatory Input,” focuses on the issue of showing compliance with given...

  18. Confidentiality Agreement between the Nuclear Decommissioning...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Confidentiality Agreement between the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority in UK and US ... Confidentiality Agreement between the US Department of Energy, the UK Nuclear ...

  19. Template Implementing Agreement | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Not provided DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Template Implementing Agreement Citation Template Implementing Agreement...

  20. ACHP - Nationwide Programmatic Agreements | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Agreements Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: ACHP - Nationwide Programmatic Agreements Abstract This webpage lists the...

  1. Tribal Energy Resource Agreements | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Tribal Energy Resource Agreements Jump to: navigation, search A Tribal Energy Resource Agreement (TERA) grants authority to a tribe to review and approve leases, business...

  2. GEO UNIT AGREEMENT | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    GEO UNIT AGREEMENT Jump to: navigation, search GEO UNIT AGREEMENT Mineral interest joined together to explore, develop and produce geothermal resources Retrieved from "http:...

  3. Eight National Labs Offer Streamlined Partnership Agreements...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Eight National Labs Offer Streamlined Partnership Agreements to Help Industry Bring New Technologies to Market Eight National Labs Offer Streamlined Partnership Agreements to Help...

  4. Standard Form 312, Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    CLASSIFIED INFORMATION NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN AND THE UNITED STATES (Name of Individual - Printed or typed) 1. Intending to be legally bound, I hereby accept...

  5. Power Purchase Agreements | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Power Purchase Agreements Presentation covers the power purchase agreements taken from the FEMP Alternative Finance Options (AFO) webinar. PDF icon afoppapres.pdf More Documents ...

  6. Cooperative Research & Development Agreements (CRADA) | The Ames Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Contract Research Cooperative Research & Development Agreements (CRADA) CRADAs enable the Ames Laboratory and one or more partners (usually from industry or academia) to collaborate, share costs and pool the results of a particular R&D program. The Laboratory may provide personnel, facilities, equipment or other resources to these R&D collaborations. Collaborating partners may provide funds, personnel, equipment or other resources. Key features of CRADA's and CRADA negotiations

  7. Carbon Compliance Acquisition 16 Limited | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Compliance Acquisition 16 Limited Jump to: navigation, search Name: Carbon Compliance Acquisition 16 Limited Place: United Kingdom Zip: LS12DS Product: Security broking and fund...

  8. CHP: A Technical & Economic Compliance Strategy - SEE Action...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CHP: A Technical & Economic Compliance Strategy - SEE Action Webinar, January 2012 CHP: A Technical & Economic Compliance Strategy - SEE Action Webinar, January 2012 This ...

  9. Executive Order 12088: Federal Compliance with Pollution Control...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2088: Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards Executive Order 12088: Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards The head of each Executive agency is ...

  10. Carbon Compliance Acquisition 5 Limited | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Compliance Acquisition 5 Limited Jump to: navigation, search Name: Carbon Compliance Acquisition 5 Limited Place: Greater London, United Kingdom Zip: EC2M 2TD Sector: Carbon...

  11. Facility Safety

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2005-12-22

    This Order establishes facility and programmatic safety requirements for Department of Energy facilities, which includes nuclear and explosives safety design criteria, fire protection, criticality safety, natural phenomena hazards mitigation, and the System Engineer Program. Cancels DOE O 420.1A. DOE O 420.1B Chg 1 issued 4-19-10.

  12. Master CRADA Project Letter Agreement

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Shared-resource(8/06) 1 of 3 07/08/09 PROJECT LETTER AGREEMENT hereinafter "PLA" No. X To MASTER TERMS AND CONDITIONS For CRADA No. CRD-09-XXX between The Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, Operator of The National Renewable Energy Laboratory under its U.S. Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401 (hereinafter "Contractor") and Company Address City, State, Zip (hereinafter "Participant"), both being hereinafter

  13. Corporate planning for compliance with EPA`s proposed risk management program rule

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mannan, M.; Keeney, R.C.

    1995-12-31

    On October 20, 1993, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published in the Federal Register the proposed rule entitled Risk Management Programs for Chemical Accidental Release Prevention (40 CFR 68). Subsequently, on January 31, 1994, EPA published in the Federal Register the finalized list of 77 regulated toxic substances and 63 regulated flammable substances that are to be covered under the rule along with the associated threshold quantities for each substance. This list of substances will dictate which stationary sources will have to comply with the requirements of the proposed risk management program rule. The risk management program rule will most likely be finalized sometime after mid-1995. Covered facilities will then have a total of three years to achieve complete compliance with the requirements of the rule. This paper presents an approach for corporations with multiple sites to develop action plans for implementation of the risk management program rule. The process starts with a determination of which facilities are potentially covered, development of a matrix of requirements that each facility must comply with, and finally, common strategies that may be used in achieving compliance. Thus, a multi-facility corporation can develop a baseline compliance guideline document that individual plants can use in developing and implementing their risk management programs.

  14. Rocky Flats Cleanup Agreement implementation successes and challenges

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Shelton, D.C.

    1997-02-01

    On July 19, 1996 the US Department of Energy (DOE), State of Colorado (CDPHE), and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) entered into an agreement called the Rocky Flats Cleanup Agreement (RFCA) for the cleanup and closure of the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS or Rocky Flats). Major elements of the agreement include: an Integrated Site-Wide Baseline; up to twelve significant enforceable milestones per year; agreed upon soil and water action levels and standards for cleanup; open space as the likely foreseeable land use; the plutonium and TRU waste removed by 2015; streamlined regulatory process; agreement with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) to coordinate activities; and a risk reduction focus. Successful implementation of RFCA requires a substantial effort by the parties to change their way of thinking about RFETS and meet the deliverables and commitments. Substantial progress toward Site closure through the implementation of RFCA has been accomplished in the short time since the signing, yet much remains to be done. Much can be learned from the Rocky Flats experience by other facilities in similar situations.

  15. Energy Efficiency Financing Program Agreement Template

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    A template agreement that addresses the full energy efficiency or renewable energy loan origination cycle.

  16. Chapter 15: Contracts, Agreements, and other Resources

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Clean Energy Finance Guide, Third Edition, December 9, 2010, Chapter 15: Contracts, Agreements, and Other Resources.

  17. Scanned_Agreement.pdf | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Agreement.pdf Scanned_Agreement.pdf PDF icon Scanned_Agreement.pdf More Documents & Publications MOED_of_the_Italian_Republic.PDF International_Agreements_January_2001_December_2004.pdf Implementing Arrangement Between DOE and METI on R&D Cooperation on Clean Energy Technology - April 2015

  18. Energy Efficiency Loan Program Agreement Template

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ______________________________________________________________ [Program Name] Energy Efficiency Loan Program Agreement City/County of [ ], and [ ] Bank [ ], 2010 ENERGY EFFICIENCY LOAN PROGRAM AGREEMENT This Energy Efficiency Loan Program Agreement ("Agreement"), dated [ ], 2010 is undertaken by: The City of [ ] (the "City") incorporated under the laws of [ ] State; and [ ] Bank, a subsidiary of [ ] Corporation, ("Bank") a [ ] State chartered commercial bank,

  19. Oklahoma State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office.

  20. Georgia State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office.

  1. Arizona State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office.

  2. Nebraska State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office.

  3. Texas State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office.

  4. Nevada State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office.

  5. Missouri State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office.

  6. California State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office.

  7. Verifier Partner Agreement | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Verifier Partner Agreement Verifier Partner Agreement Through this agreement, the registered organization ("Partner") joins in partnership with the Department of Energy (DOE). Partner recognizes that by accepting this agreement they are expected to construct and verify homes to meet the DOE Challenge Home National Program Requirements. PDF icon dch_verifier_pkg.pdf More Documents & Publications Builder Partner Agreement Guidelines for Correctly Using the DOE Zero Energy Ready Home

  8. ZERH Lender Partnership Agreement | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Lender Partnership Agreement ZERH Lender Partnership Agreement What is expected of partners? Every type of partner has its own role. Review the partnership agreement package below for more information on partner expectations. Lender partners may be any person or entity that offers mortgage services for residential properties. PDF icon ZERH Lender Partnership Agreement More Documents & Publications 2015 Leading Builder Round Table Report ZERH Builder Partnership Agreement Valuing Green in the

  9. Total Energy Facilities Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Energy Facilities Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Total Energy Facilities Biomass Facility Facility Total Energy Facilities Sector Biomass Facility Type...

  10. Gas Utilization Facility Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Gas Utilization Facility Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Gas Utilization Facility Biomass Facility Facility Gas Utilization Facility Sector Biomass Facility Type...

  11. Using compliance audits as the basis for developing an effective mechanical integrity program

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kiihne, E.J.; Mannan, M. [RMT/Jones and Neuse, Inc., Austin, TX (United States)

    1996-08-01

    The OSHA Process Safety Management (PSM) rule requires all covered facilities to conduct a compliance audit every three years. In addition, all the audit findings must be resolved within a reasonable time period. The process industry as a whole is lagging behind in compliance with mechanical integrity program requirements as demonstrated by the high number of OSHA citations issued to-date on mechanical integrity-related issues. This paper analyzes the findings of several PSM compliance audits and develops recommendations for developing effective mechanical integrity programs. The six explicit requirements of mechanical integrity, i.e. covered equipment, written procedures, training, inspection and testing, equipment deficiencies, and quality assurance are analyzed in the following manner: Number of OSHA citations in mechanical integrity and the distribution of these citations between the six specific requirements. Comparison of the OSHA citations with the audit findings from PSM compliance audits conducted by the authors. Using the conclusions from the OSHA citations and PSM compliance audits as a basis for developing effective mechanical integrity programs.

  12. High Exposure Facility Technical Description

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Carter, Gregory L.; Stithem, Arthur R.; Murphy, Mark K.; Smith, Alex K.

    2008-02-12

    The High Exposure Facility is a collimated high-level gamma irradiator that is located in the basement of the 318 building. It was custom developed by PNNL back in 1982 to meet the needs for high range radiological instrument calibrations and dosimeter irradiations. At the time no commercially available product existed that could create exposure rates up to 20,000 R/h. This document is intended to pass on the design criteria that was employed to create this unique facility, while maintaining compliance with ANSI N543-1974, "General Safety Standard for Installations Using Non-Medical X-Ray and Sealed Gamma-Ray Sources, Energies up to 10 MeV."

  13. Draft Title 40 CFR 191 compliance certification application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Volume 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-03-31

    The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is a research and development facility for the demonstration of the permanent isolation of transuranic radioactive wastes in a geologic formation. The facility was constructed in southeastern New Mexico in a manner intended to meet criteria established by the scientific and regulatory community for the safe, long-term disposal of transuranic wastes. The US Department of Energy (DOE) is preparing an application to demonstrate compliance with the requirements outlined in Title 40, Part 191 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for the permanent disposal of transuranic wastes. As mandated by the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Land Withdrawal Act of 1992, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must evaluate this compliance application and provide a determination regarding compliance with the requirements within one year of receiving a complete application. Because the WIPP is a very complex program, the DOE has planned to submit the application as a draft in two parts. This strategy will allow for the DOE and the EPA to begin technical discussions on critical WIPP issues before the one-year compliance determination period begins. This report is the first of these two draft submittals.

  14. Facility Safety

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2002-05-20

    To establish facility safety requirements for the Department of Energy, including National Nuclear Security Administration. Cancels DOE O 420.1. Canceled by DOE O 420.1B.

  15. Research Facility,

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    and Delivering the Data As a general condition for use of the ARM Climate Research Facility, users are required to include their data in the ARM Data Archive. All data acquired...

  16. Facility Safety

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2013-06-21

    DOE-STD-1104 contains the Department's method and criteria for reviewing and approving nuclear facility's documented safety analysis (DSA). This review and approval formally document the basis for DOE, concluding that a facility can be operated safely in a manner that adequately protects workers, the public, and the environment. Therefore, it is appropriate to formally require implementation of the review methodology and criteria contained in DOE-STD-1104.

  17. Facility Safety

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2000-11-20

    The objective of this Order is to establish facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation. The Order has Change 1 dated 11-16-95, Change 2 dated 10-24-96, and the latest Change 3 dated 11-22-00 incorporated. The latest change satisfies a commitment made to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) in response to DNFSB recommendation 97-2, Criticality Safety.

  18. Facility Safety

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2005-12-22

    The order establishes facility and programmatic safety requirements for nuclear and explosives safety design criteria, fire protection, criticality safety, natural phenomena hazards (NPH) mitigation, and the System Engineer Program.Chg 1 incorporates the use of DOE-STD-1189-2008, Integration of Safety into the Design Process, mandatory for Hazard Category 1, 2 and 3 nuclear facilities. Cancels DOE O 420.1A.

  19. MSGP Documents & Reports by Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Obeying Environmental Laws » MSGP » MSGP Documents & Reports by Facility MSGP Documents & Reports EPA's MSGP requires a site to keep records of any activities that are related to compliance, such as conducting inspections, visual assessments, stormwater discharge monitoring, and corrective actions. Contact Environmental Communication & Public Involvement P.O. Box 1663 MS M996 Los Alamos, NM 87545 (505) 667-0216 Email MSGP Record Requirements The following records are available for

  20. Section 54: Scope of Compliance Assessments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    transport pathway is through the anhydrite marker beds, as assumed in previous CRAs and the CCA (Appendix IGP-2014, Section IGP-2.2.1 ). The DOE's approach to compliance...

  1. Whirlpool: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0103)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    DOE issued a Notice of Compliance Determination to Whirlpool Corporation after DOE testing confirmed that the Maytag refrigerator-freezer model MSD2578VE comports with the applicable energy conservation standard.

  2. Iowa Compliance Implementation and Evaluation Guide

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cole, Pamala C.

    2012-09-04

    This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings.

  3. Nevada Compliance Implementation and Evaluation Guide

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cole, Pamala C.

    2012-08-30

    This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings.

  4. Utah Compliance Implementation and Evaluation Guide

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cole, Pamala C.

    2012-08-30

    This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings.

  5. Working with SRNL - Our Facilities - Glovebox Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    SRNL Our Facilities - Glovebox Facilities Govebox Facilities are sealed, protectively-lined compartments with attached gloves, allowing workers to safely handle dangerous materials...

  6. Energy Code Compliance and Enforcement Best Practices | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Code Compliance and Enforcement Best Practices Energy Code Compliance and Enforcement Best Practices This webinar covers how to access current practices, compliance best practices, and enforce best practices with energy code compliances. Transcript PDF icon Presentation More Documents & Publications Preparing for the Arrival of Electric Vehicle Green Codes and Programs Effective O&M Policy in Public Buildings

  7. Sandia National Laboratories: Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Facilities Bioscience Computing and Information Science Electromagnetics Facilities Electromagnetic Environments Simulator (EMES) Mode Stirred Chamber Lightning Facility...

  8. LANL in Compliance with Clean Water Act

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    disputes citizens' lawsuit February 7, 2008 LANL in Compliance with Clean Water Act LOS ALAMOS, NM, Feb. 7, 2008-Los Alamos National Laboratory officials today expressed surprise to a lawsuit alleging noncompliance with the federal Clean Water Act filed today by citizens groups against Los Alamos National Security LLC and the U.S. Department of Energy. "The Laboratory is in compliance with its storm water permit under the federal Clean Water Act," said Dick Watkins, associate director

  9. EPA Regulation Compliance | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    EPA Regulation Compliance EPA Regulation Compliance OE offers technical assistance on implementing the new and pending EPA air rules affecting the electric utility industry. Examples of typical assistance include technical information on cost and performance of the various power plant pollution retrofit control technologies; technical information on generation, demand-side or transmission alternatives for any replacement power needed for retiring generating units; and assistance to regulators

  10. Labor Compliance Advisor | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Labor Compliance Advisor Labor Compliance Advisor Executive Order 13673 Executive Order 13673 Read more Labor Standards/Wage and Hour Laws Labor Standards/Wage and Hour Laws Establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, and recordkeeping requirements. Read more Equal Employment Opportunity/Workforce Restructuring Laws Equal Employment Opportunity/Workforce Restructuring Laws Prohibits discrimination against individuals on the basis of various protected categories including race, sex, age, disability,

  11. SLAC Accelerator Test Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    FACET & TF Careers & Education Archived FACET User Facility Quick Launch About FACET & Test Facilities Expand About FACET & Test Facilities FACET & Test Facilities User Portal...

  12. Waste Form Qualification Compliance Strategy for Bulk Vitrification

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bagaasen, Larry M.; Westsik, Joseph H.; Brouns, Thomas M.

    2005-01-03

    The Bulk Vitrification System is being pursued to assist in immobilizing the low-activity tank waste from the 53 million gallons of radioactive waste in the 177 underground storage tanks on the Hanford Site. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the bulk vitrification process, a research and development facility known as the Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System (DBVS) is being built to demonstrate the technology. Specific performance requirements for the final packaged bulk vitrification waste form have been identified. In addition to the specific product-performance requirements, performance targets/goals have been identified that are necessary to qualify the waste form but do not lend themselves to specifications that are easily verified through short-term testing. Collectively, these form the product requirements for the DBVS. This waste-form qualification (WFQ) strategy document outlines the general strategies for achieving and demonstrating compliance with the BVS product requirements. The specific objectives of the WFQ activities are discussed, the bulk vitrification process and product control strategy is outlined, and the test strategy to meet the WFQ objectives is described. The DBVS product performance targets/goals and strategies to address those targets/goals are described. The DBVS product-performance requirements are compared to the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant immobilized low-activity waste product specifications. The strategies for demonstrating compliance with the bulk vitrification product requirements are presented.

  13. PSM case history: Regulatory compliance can prevent catastrophic incidents

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kiihne, E.J.; Mannan, M. [RMT/Jones and Neuse, Inc., Austin, TX (United States)

    1995-12-31

    As mandated by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration promulgated on February 24, 1992 the Process Safety Management (PSM) rule: 29 CFR 1910.119. The PSM rule represents a holistic program which requires facilities to develop, implement and practice 14 different elements. Each of the 14 elements are significant in the protection of health and safety of all employees and personnel working in and around the plant site. PSM programs developed in compliance with the PSM rule are expected to reduce the probability and consequence of occurrence of hazardous incidents. This paper presents a real life incident that occurred in a plant before a PSM program was put in place. A detailed description of the incident is provided with appropriate discussions of non compliance with the PSM rule. Finally, the paper provides a theoretical scenario where a fully operational PSM program would have prevented the incident. The case history and discussion provided in this paper also reinforces the concept of maintaining process and equipment integrity through multiple barriers of safety. A fully operational PSM program represents such a multiple barrier safety system.

  14. DOE-STD-1156-2002; Environmental Compliance Function Area Qualification Standard

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    6-2002 October 2002 DOE STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1156-2002 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S.

  15. Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2001-06-01

    To define the program for the management of cost-effective maintenance of Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities. Guidance for compliance with this Order is contained in DOE G 433.1-1, Nuclear Facility Maintenance Management Program Guide for use with DOE O 433.1, which references Federal regulations, DOE directives, and industry best practices using a graded approach to clarify requirements and guidance for maintaining DOE-owned Government property. (Cancels DOE 4330.4B, Chapter II, Maintenance Management Program, dated 2-10-94.) Cancels DOE 4330.4B (in part). Canceled by DOE O 433.1A.

  16. Compliance and Special Report Orders | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Compliance and Special Report Orders Compliance and Special Report Orders Compliance Orders July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC related to the Unauthorized Reproduction and Removal of Classified Matter from the Los Alamos National Laboratory May 26, 1999 Preliminary Notice of Violation and Compliance Order, EA-1999-04 Issued to Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., relating to events at the Spent Nuclear Fuels

  17. 12.0 CHANGES TO THE AGREEMENT

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2-1 12.0 CHANGES TO THE AGREEMENT 12.1 INTRODUCTION This section provides the process for changing elements of the Agreement, the Action Plan and its appendices. All changes...

  18. ZERH Lender Partnership Agreement | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Lender partners may be any person or entity that offers mortgage services for residential properties. PDF icon ZERH Lender Partnership Agreement More Documents & Publications 2015 Leading Builder Round Table Report ZERH Builder Partnership Agreement PHIUS Information

  19. Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon statehistoricpreservationprogrammaticagreementpa...

  20. Technical Service Agreement (TSA) | The Ames Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Contract Research Technical Service Agreement (TSA) A technical service agreement facilitates small, short time-framed projects for a partner that does not involve research. These agreements may be utilized for data analysis, building a unique piece of equipment or other technical services where the expertise or unique capabilities of the Ames Laboratory are crucial. The boilerplate TSA agreement for non-proprietary work can be can be obtained here and the proprietary work can be obtained here.

  1. EM International Agreements | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    EM International Agreements EM International Agreements Confidentiality Agreement between the US Department of Energy, the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, and the UK National Nuclear Laboratory Limited, 2015 Confidentiality Agreement between the US Department of Energy, the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, and the UK National Nuclear Laboratory Limited, 2015 Statement of Intent between the US Department of Energy and UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Statement of Intent between the

  2. Material Transfer Agreements (MTA) | The Ames Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Contract Research Material Transfer Agreements (MTA) Materials Transfer Agreements (MTAs) are used to transfer materials, biological or non-biological, between institutions from all sectors of the scientific community. Before you sign a materials transfer agreement, receive materials transferred from another organization, or send materials to another organization, contact Deb Covey so that she may review the terms and conditions of the agreement (covey@ameslab.gov, 294-1048, Room 311 TASF).

  3. NREL: Technology Transfer - Agreements for Commercializing Technology

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Agreements for Commercializing Technology NREL uses Agreements for Commercializing Technology (ACT) when a partner seeks highly specialized or technical services to complete a project. An ACT agreement also authorizes participating contractor-operated DOE laboratories, such as NREL, to partner with businesses using more flexible terms that are aligned with industry practice. Read more about how this partnership tool increases flexibility. The agreement type used depends on the business, and the

  4. Proposed Tri-Party Agreement Modifications

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Proposed Tri-Party Agreement Modifications for Initial Single Shell Tank Waste Management Area Corrective Actions, Vadose Zone and Groundwater...

  5. Builder Partner Agreement | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Builder Partner Agreement Builder Partner Agreement Through this agreement, the registered organization ("Partner") joins in partnership with the Department of Energy (DOE). Partner recognizes that by accepting this agreement they are expected to construct and verify homes to meet the DOE Challenge Home National Program Requirements. PDF icon dch_builder_pkg.pdf More Documents & Publications Guidelines for Correctly Using the DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Name and Logo Verifier

  6. Training Partner Agreement | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Training Partner Agreement Training Partner Agreement Through this agreement, the registered organization ("Partner") joins in partnership with the Department of Energy (DOE). Partner recognizes that by accepting this agreement they are expected to support DOE in its efforts to train builders on the benefits of participation in the DOE Challenge Home program and how to build zero net-energy ready homes. PDF icon dch_training_pkg.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE Challenge Home:

  7. Prototype Programmatic Agreement Guidance | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Prototype Programmatic Agreement Guidance Prototype Programmatic Agreement Guidance Prototype programmatic agreements are a type of program alternative that the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) can designate to assist federal agencies in their efforts to comply with the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470f) and its implementing regulations (36 CFR Part 800). Prototype agreements may be used for the same type of program or

  8. Collective Bargaining Agreement | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Collective Bargaining Agreement Collective Bargaining Agreement This collective bargaining agreement is entered into to prescribe certain rights and obligations of the employees of the Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters represented by the National Treasury Employees Union and to delineate procedures which are designed to meet the special requirements and needs of DOE Headquarters. The provisions of this agreement have been negotiated and should be interpreted in a manner consistent with the

  9. ZERH Builder Partnership Agreement | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Builder partners may be any person or entity that constructs single-family homes, multifamily buildings, affordable housing, manufactured homes or develops land. PDF icon Builder Partnership Agreement More Documents & Publications ZERH Verifier Partnership Agreement ZERH Architect and Designer Partnership Agreement ZERH Lender

  10. Live from Greenbuild: From the Industrial Facilities Connect & Learn |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Live from Greenbuild: From the Industrial Facilities Connect & Learn Live from Greenbuild: From the Industrial Facilities Connect & Learn November 18, 2015 - 5:32pm Addthis By Monica Kanojia The industrial industry is filled with unique and dynamic projects with substantially high process loads and resource consumption. This sector faces a different set of challenges in attaining sustainably built campuses. Owners must address compliance, regulations and safety

  11. Facility Safety

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1995-10-13

    Establishes facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation. Cancels DOE 5480.7A, DOE 5480.24, DOE 5480.28 and Division 13 of DOE 6430.1A. Canceled by DOE O 420.1A.

  12. Facility Safety

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2012-12-04

    The Order establishes facility and programmatic safety requirements for DOE and NNSA for nuclear safety design criteria, fire protection, criticality safety, natural phenomena hazards (NPH) mitigation, and System Engineer Program. Cancels DOE O 420.1B, DOE G 420.1-2 and DOE G 420.1-3.

  13. Metro Methane Recovery Facility Biomass Facility | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Methane Recovery Facility Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Metro Methane Recovery Facility Biomass Facility Facility Metro Methane Recovery Facility Sector Biomass...

  14. LANSCE | Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Los Alamos Neutron Science Center lansce.lanl.gov lansce-user-office@lanl.gov mesa header Beam Status Accelerator Ops (Internal) Operating Schedule Long Range Operating Schedule User Resources User Agreements Proposals Visit Registration Schedules Experiment Reports User Satisfaction Survey Reviews Users User Office User Program LANSCE User Group Rosen Scholar Rosen Prize News & Multimedia News Multimedia Events Profiles Highlights Seminars Activity Reports The Pulse User Program Headlines

  15. ARM - SGP Intermediate Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Intermediate Facility SGP Related Links Virtual Tour Facilities and Instruments Central Facility Boundary Facility Extended Facility Intermediate Facility Radiometric Calibration Facility Geographic Information ES&H Guidance Statement Operations Science Field Campaigns Visiting the Site SGP Fact Sheet Images Information for Guest Scientists Contacts SGP Intermediate Facility For over 20 years, 3 intermediate facilities, within 6.2 miles (10 km) of the Central Facility, provided a

  16. ARM - Guest Instrument Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    PlainsGuest Instrument Facility SGP Related Links Virtual Tour Facilities and Instruments Central Facility Boundary Facility Extended Facility Intermediate Facility Radiometric Calibration Facility Geographic Information ES&H Guidance Statement Operations Science Field Campaigns Visiting the Site SGP Fact Sheet Images Information for Guest Scientists Contacts Guest Instrument Facility ARM's Guest Instrument Facility at the SGP site near Lamont, Oklahoma. ARM's Guest Instrument Facility at

  17. Mobile Pit verification system design based on passive special nuclear material verification in weapons storage facilities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Paul, J. N.; Chin, M. R.; Sjoden, G. E.

    2013-07-01

    A mobile 'drive by' passive radiation detection system to be applied in special nuclear materials (SNM) storage facilities for validation and compliance purposes has been designed through the use of computational modeling and new radiation detection methods. This project was the result of work over a 1 year period to create optimal design specifications to include creation of 3D models using both Monte Carlo and deterministic codes to characterize the gamma and neutron leakage out each surface of SNM-bearing canisters. Results were compared and agreement was demonstrated between both models. Container leakages were then used to determine the expected reaction rates using transport theory in the detectors when placed at varying distances from the can. A 'typical' background signature was incorporated to determine the minimum signatures versus the probability of detection to evaluate moving source protocols with collimation. This established the criteria for verification of source presence and time gating at a given vehicle speed. New methods for the passive detection of SNM were employed and shown to give reliable identification of age and material for highly enriched uranium (HEU) and weapons grade plutonium (WGPu). The finalized 'Mobile Pit Verification System' (MPVS) design demonstrated that a 'drive-by' detection system, collimated and operating at nominally 2 mph, is capable of rapidly verifying each and every weapon pit stored in regularly spaced, shelved storage containers, using completely passive gamma and neutron signatures for HEU and WGPu. This system is ready for real evaluation to demonstrate passive total material accountability in storage facilities. (authors)

  18. CRAD, Environmental Protection- Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Environmental Compliance Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility.

  19. CRAD, Environmental Protection- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a January 2005 assessment of Environmental Compliance program at the Y-12 - Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility.

  20. Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2012 Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hall, Derek B.; Anderson, David C.; Greger, Paul D.; Ostler, W. Kent; Hansen, Dennis J.

    2013-07-03

    The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO, formerly Nevada Site Office), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NNSS biota. This report summarizes the program’s activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), during calendar year 2012. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem monitoring, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat restoration monitoring, and (g) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). During 2012, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

  1. Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2011 Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hansen, D. J.; Anderson, D. C.; Hall, D. B.; Greger, P. D.; Ostler, W. K.

    2012-06-13

    The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance (EMAC) Program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NNSS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC, during calendar year 2011. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem monitoring, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat restoration monitoring, and (g) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex. During 2011, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

  2. Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2009 Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hansen, J. Dennis; Anderson, David C.; Hall, Derek B.; Greger, Paul D.; Ostler, W. Kent

    2010-07-13

    The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program’s activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC, during calendar year 2009. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex. During 2009, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

  3. Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2013 Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hall, Derek B.; Anderson, David C.; Greger, Paul D.

    2014-06-05

    The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO, formerly Nevada Site Office), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NNSS biota. This report summarizes the program’s activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), during calendar year 2013. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed activity sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem monitoring, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, and (f) habitat restoration monitoring. During 2013, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

  4. Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2010 Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hansen, D.J.; Anderson, D.C.; Hall, D.B.; Greger, P.D.; Ostler, W.K.

    2011-07-01

    The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance (EMAC) Program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NNSS biota. This report summarizes the program’s activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), during calendar year 2010. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem monitoring, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat restoration monitoring, and (g) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). During 2010, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

  5. Summary of radionuclide air emissions from Department of Energy facilities for CY 1992

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-02-01

    DOE facilities submit annual reports to their respective EPA regional offices and to EPA headquarters describing their activities during the previous year, including estimates of atmospheric radionuclide emissions and the resulting dose to the maximally exposed member of the public. This report summarizes the information submitted to EPA by DOE facilities in their air emission reports for calendar year 1992. An overview of DOE facility compliance with the NESHAPs Subpart H dose standard is provided. In addition to the required compliance information, supplemental information on air emissions is discussed.

  6. Facility Type!

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ITY: --&L~ ----------- srct-r~ -----------~------~------- if yee, date contacted ------------- cl Facility Type! i I 0 Theoretical Studies Cl Sample 84 Analysis ] Production 1 Diepasal/Storage 'YPE OF CONTRACT .--------------- 1 Prime J Subcontract&- 1 Purchase Order rl i '1 ! Other information (i.e., ---------~---~--~-------- :ontrait/Pirchaee Order # , I C -qXlJ- --~-------~~-------~~~~~~ I I ~~~---~~~~~~~T~~~ FONTRACTING PERIODi IWNERSHIP: ,I 1 AECIMED AECMED GOVT GOUT &NTtiAC+OR

  7. nondisclosure agreement | netl.doe.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    nondisclosure agreement Non-disclosure Agreements (NDAs) are sometimes referred to as confidentiality agreements and are used when NETL and/or another party wish to exchange information that is either considered potentially patentable by NETL or proprietary by the other party. NETL is bound to maintain information received in the course of business confidential by the Trade Secrets Act (18 USC Sec. 1905). However, NETL will enter into an NDA that reiterates this protection. NDA's may be

  8. Cooperative Research and Development Agreement Example

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Renewable Energy Laboratory Cooperative Research and Development Agreement Appendix A-Joint Work Statement CRADA # CRD-09-XXX Project Letter Agreement No. X Title: Solar Technology Validation Project Abstract of CRADA work: Under this Agreement, NREL will work with Participant to improve concentrating solar power system performance characterizations. This work includes, but is not limited to, research and development of methods for acquiring renewable resource characterization information using

  9. ZERH Verifier Partnership Agreement | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Verifier Partnership Agreement ZERH Verifier Partnership Agreement What is expected of partners? Every type of partner has its own role. Review the partnership agreement package below for more information on partner expectations. Verifier partners must be accredited Home Energy Raters, Building America team members, or participate in other accredited verification programs recognized by DOE. PDF icon ZERH Verifier PA Final.pdf More Documents & Publications ZERH Architect and Designer

  10. Agreement to Mediate | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Agreement to Mediate Agreement to Mediate This document generally discusses the parameters of the HQ mediation process and is expected to be signed by each party at the outset of the mediation process. By signing the document, each party acknowledges the voluntary and confidential nature of the process, among others, and commits to engage in the process in good faith. PDF icon OCPR-HQ-008 Final - Agreement to Mediate.pdf More Documents & Publications Mediation Process Management Reminde

  11. Cooperative Agreement Awarded | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Awarded Cooperative Agreement Awarded September 28, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor bill.taylor@srs.gov 803-952-8564 Cincinnati - The Department of Energy today awarded a cooperative agreement to the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) to continue efforts to engage states and to work collaboratively to solve continued challenges posed by waste management and cleanup at DOE sites. Through this cooperative agreement, the NGA Center will continue

  12. U.S. and China Sign Agreement to Increase Industrial Energy Efficiency |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Sign Agreement to Increase Industrial Energy Efficiency U.S. and China Sign Agreement to Increase Industrial Energy Efficiency September 14, 2007 - 2:33pm Addthis DOE to Conduct Energy Efficiency Audits on up to 12 Facilities SAN FRANCISCO, CA - U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Policy and International Affairs Karen Harbert and Vice Chairman of the National Development and Reform Committee (NDRC) Chen Deming, this week signed a Memorandum of

  13. Precision: Compromise Agreement (2013-SE-1410)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE and Precision Trading Corp. entered into a Compromise Agreement to resolve a case involving the distribution in commerce of noncompliant freezers.

  14. Energy Efficiency Financing Program Agreement—Template

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    A template agreement that addresses the full energy efficiency or renewable energy loan origination cycle. Author: U.S. Department of Energy

  15. Pax Global: Compromise Agreement (2013-SE-1413)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE and Pax Global, Inc., entered into a Compromise Agreement to resolve a case involving the distribution in commerce of noncompliant freezers.

  16. Intellectual Property Provisions (CDLB-115) Cooperative Agreement...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    15.pdf More Documents & Publications CDLB-1003.PDF&0; Intellectual Property Provisions (CLB-115) Cooperative Agreement Research, Development, or Demonstration Large Business and...

  17. Intellectual Property Provisions (CDSB-115) Cooperative Agreement...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    15.pdf More Documents & Publications CDSB-1003.PDF&0; Intellectual Property Provisions (CDLB-115) Cooperative Agreement - Special Data Statute Research, Development, or...

  18. International reservoir operations agreement helps NW fish &...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    or 503-230-5131 International reservoir operations agreement helps Northwest fish and power Portland, Ore. - The Bonneville Power Administration and the British Columbia...

  19. Grainger: Compromise Agreement (2013-SE-1411)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE and Grainger International Inc. entered into a Compromise Agreement to resolve a case involving the distribution in commerce of noncompliant freezers.

  20. Power Purchase Agreements | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    A Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) is a financing structure that enables property owners or tenants, including state and local governments, to realize the benefits of renewable...

  1. CE: Compromise Agreement (2013-SE-1429)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE and CE North America entered into a Compromise Agreement to resolve a case involving the distribution in commerce of noncompliant freezers.

  2. Haier: Compromise Agreement (2011-SE-1408)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE and Haier America Trading, L.L.C., entered into a Compromise Agreement to resolve a case involving the distribution in commerce of noncompliant freezers.

  3. Golden Opportunity: Compromise Agreement (2013-SE-1418)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE and Golden Opportunity, Inc. entered into a Compromise Agreement to resolve a case involving the distribution in commerce of noncompliant freezers.

  4. Unilateral (In) Nondisclosure Agreement … Sample

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    IN) Non-Disclosure Agreement (REV 07/09) Page 1 of 3 NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") This Agreement is entered into by and between the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC ("Alliance"), the Manager and Operator of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory ("NREL") under Prime Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 for the U.S. Department of Energy (the "DOE"), located at 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado, 80401 and [DISCLOSING PARTY NAME]

  5. Unilateral (Out) Nondisclosure Agreement … Sample

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    OUT) Non-Disclosure Agreement (Rev 07/09) Page 1 of 3 NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") This Agreement is entered into by and between the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC ("Alliance"), the Manager and Operator of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory ("NREL") under Prime Contract No. DE- AC36-08GO28308 for the U.S. Department of Energy (the "DOE"), located at 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado, 80401 and [COMPANY NAME] ("Company"),

  6. Solar Power Purchase Agreements | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    an overview of solar power purchase agreements including how they work, benefits and challenges and eligibility. Author: United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Website...

  7. Sears: Compromise Agreement (2011-SE-1418)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE and Sears, Roebuck & Co. entered into a Compromise Agreement to resolve a case involving the distribution in commerce of noncompliant freezers.

  8. Floating Rate Agreement | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    & Publications Fixed Rate Agreement Federal Loan Guarantees for Projects that Manufacture Commercial Technology Renewable Energy Systems and Components: August 10, 2010...

  9. Bigwall: Compromise Agreement (2013-SE-1412)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE and Bigwall Enterprises, Inc., entered into a Compromise Agreement to resolve a case involving the distribution in commerce of noncompliant freezers.

  10. Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    The WPEA strengthens protections for federal employees who disclose evidence of waste, fraud, or abuse. The WPEA requires that each agreement contained in an SF 312, "Classified...

  11. SGP Central Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Central Facility SGP Related Links Virtual Tour Facilities and Instruments Central Facility Boundary Facility Extended Facility Intermediate Facility Radiometric Calibration Facility Geographic Information ES&H Guidance Statement Operations Science Field Campaigns Visiting the Site SGP Fact Sheet Images Information for Guest Scientists Contacts SGP Central Facility The ARM Climate Research Facility deploys specialized remote sensing instruments in a fixed location at the site to gather

  12. ARM - SGP Extended Facility

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Extended Facility SGP Related Links Virtual Tour Facilities and Instruments Central Facility Boundary Facility Extended Facility Intermediate Facility Radiometric Calibration Facility Geographic Information ES&H Guidance Statement Operations Science Field Campaigns Visiting the Site SGP Fact Sheet Images Information for Guest Scientists Contacts SGP Extended Facility For over 20 years, 23 extended facilities were distributed evenly throughout a 55,000-square-mile domain and at the corners of

  13. Department of Energy - Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance ...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Department of Energy - Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance...

  14. Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2007 Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hansen, Dennis; Anderson, David; Derek, Hall; Greger, Paul; Ostler, W. Kent

    2008-03-01

    In accordance with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 450.1, 'Environmental Protection Program', the Office of the Assistant Manager for Environmental Management of the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) requires ecological monitoring and biological compliance support for activities and programs conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), Ecological Services has implemented the Ecological Monitoring and Compliance (EMAC) Program to provide this support. EMAC is designed to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, delineate and define NTS ecosystems, and provide ecological information that can be used to predict and evaluate the potential impacts of proposed projects and programs on those ecosystems. This report summarizes the EMAC activities conducted by NSTec during calendar year 2007. Monitoring tasks during 2007 included eight program areas: (a) biological surveys, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) biological monitoring at the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). The following sections of this report describe work performed under these eight areas.

  15. Projects & Facilities - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Facilities About Us Projects & Facilities Email Email Page | Print Print Page |Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Projects & Facilities 100 Area 118-K-1 Burial Ground 200...

  16. Alternative Compliance Program: 10 CFR Part 490 (Presentation)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Sears, T.

    2008-10-01

    Presentation explains the Alternative Compliance option under the U.S. Department of Energy's State and Alternative Fuel Provider program.

  17. Facility Representatives

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    DOE-STD-1063-2006 April 2006 Superseding DOE-STD-1063-2000 March 2000 DOE STANDARD FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MGMT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1063-2006 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program web site at http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE-STD-1063-2006 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy standard is approved for use by

  18. Facility Representatives

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    063-2011 February 2011 Superseding DOE-STD-1063-2006 April 2006 DOE STANDARD FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MGMT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1063-2011 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1063-2011 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) standard is

  19. Hot Cell Facility (HCF) Safety Analysis Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    MITCHELL,GERRY W.; LONGLEY,SUSAN W.; PHILBIN,JEFFREY S.; MAHN,JEFFREY A.; BERRY,DONALD T.; SCHWERS,NORMAN F.; VANDERBEEK,THOMAS E.; NAEGELI,ROBERT E.

    2000-11-01

    This Safety Analysis Report (SAR) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports, and has been written to the format and content guide of DOE-STD-3009-94 Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports. The Hot Cell Facility is a Hazard Category 2 nonreactor nuclear facility, and is operated by Sandia National Laboratories for the Department of Energy. This SAR provides a description of the HCF and its operations, an assessment of the hazards and potential accidents which may occur in the facility. The potential consequences and likelihood of these accidents are analyzed and described. Using the process and criteria described in DOE-STD-3009-94, safety-related structures, systems and components are identified, and the important safety functions of each SSC are described. Additionally, information which describes the safety management programs at SNL are described in ancillary chapters of the SAR.

  20. Harrisburg Facility Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    2006 Database Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleHarrisburgFacilityBiomassFacility&oldid397545" Feedback Contact needs updating Image needs updating...

  1. Brookhaven Facility Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    2006 Database Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleBrookhavenFacilityBiomassFacility&oldid397235" Feedback Contact needs updating Image needs updating...

  2. Radiation Effects Facility - Facilities - Cyclotron Institute

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Radiation Effects Facility Typical DUT(device under test) set-up at the end of the Radiation Effects beamline. The Radiation Effects Facility is available for commercial,...

  3. Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011 | Department of Energy Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011 Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011 This document is Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement

  4. DOE Cooperative Research and Development Agreements Manual

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2001-01-12

    This Manual provides detailed requirements to supplement DOE O 483.1, DOE Cooperative Research and Development Agreements, dated 1-12-01, which establishes requirements for the performance of technology transfer through the use of Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs). Canceled by DOE O 483.1A.

  5. Commercial Buildings Cooperative Agreements | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Partnerships » Commercial Buildings Cooperative Agreements Commercial Buildings Cooperative Agreements The Building Technologies Office's Commercial Buildings Integration program issues funding opportunities to advance energy efficiency solutions and technologies for commercial buildings. These competitive solicitations are typically open to industry, small businesses, academia, the national labs, and other entities. View the 2015, 2014, or 2013 projects. 2015 Awards In 2015, BTO sought

  6. ZERH Verifier Partnership Agreement | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Verifier partners must be accredited Home Energy Raters, Building America team members, or participate in other accredited verification programs recognized by DOE. PDF icon ZERH Verifier PA Final.pdf More Documents & Publications ZERH Architect and Designer Partnership Agreement ZERH Lender Partnership Agreement Verifier

  7. Performance Assessment Program for the Savannah River Site Liquid Waste Facilities - 13610

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rosenberger, Kent H.

    2013-07-01

    The Liquid Waste facilities at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) are operated by Liquid Waste Operations contractor Savannah River Remediation LLC (SRR). A separate Performance Assessment (PA) is prepared to support disposal operations at the Saltstone Disposal Facility and closure evaluations for the two liquid waste tank farm facilities at SRS, F-Tank Farm and H-Tank Farm. A PA provides the technical basis and results to be used in subsequent documents to demonstrate compliance with the pertinent requirements identified in operations and closure regulatory guidance. The Saltstone Disposal Facility is subject to a State of South Carolina industrial solid waste landfill permit and the tank farms are subject to a state industrial waste water permit. The three Liquid Waste facilities are also subject to a Federal Facility Agreement approved by the State, DOE and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Due to the regulatory structure, a PA is a key technical document reviewed by the DOE, the State of South Carolina and the EPA. As the waste material disposed of in the Saltstone Disposal Facility and the residual material in the closed tank farms is also subject to reclassification prior to closure via a waste determination pursuant to Section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2005, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is also a reviewing agency for the PAs. Pursuant to the Act, the NRC also has a continuing role to monitor disposal actions to assess compliance with stated performance objectives. The Liquid Waste PA program at SRS represents a continual process over the life of the disposal and closure operations. When the need for a PA or PA revision is identified, the first step is to develop a conceptual model to best represent the facility conditions. The conceptual model will include physical dimensions of the closed system, both the engineered and natural system, and modeling input parameters associated with the modeled features, both initial values (at the time of facility closure) and degradation rates/values. During the development of the PA, evaluations are conducted to reflect not only the results associated with the best available information at the time but also to evaluate potential uncertainties and sensitivities associated with the modeled system. While the PA will reflect the modeled system results from the best available information, it will also identify areas for future work to reduce overall PA uncertainties moving forward. DOE requires a PA Maintenance Program such that work continues to reduce model uncertainties, thus bolstering confidence in PA results that support regulatory decisions. This maintenance work may include new Research and Development activities or modeling as informed by previous PA results and other new information that becomes available. As new information becomes available, it is evaluated against previous PAs and appropriate actions are taken to ensure continued confidence in the regulatory decisions. Therefore, the PA program is a continual process that is not just the development of a PA but seeks to incorporate new information to reduce overall model uncertainty and provide continuing confidence in regulatory decisions. (author)

  8. Calcined solids storage facility closure study

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dahlmeir, M.M.; Tuott, L.C.; Spaulding, B.C.

    1998-02-01

    The disposal of radioactive wastes now stored at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory is currently mandated under a {open_quotes}Settlement Agreement{close_quotes} (or {open_quotes}Batt Agreement{close_quotes}) between the Department of Energy and the State of Idaho. Under this agreement, all high-level waste must be treated as necessary to meet the disposal criteria and disposed of or made road ready to ship from the INEEL by 2035. In order to comply with this agreement, all calcined waste produced in the New Waste Calcining Facility and stored in the Calcined Solids Facility must be treated and disposed of by 2035. Several treatment options for the calcined waste have been studied in support of the High-Level Waste Environmental Impact Statement. Two treatment methods studied, referred to as the TRU Waste Separations Options, involve the separation of the high-level waste (calcine) into TRU waste and low-level waste (Class A or Class C). Following treatment, the TRU waste would be sent to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for final storage. It has been proposed that the low-level waste be disposed of in the Tank Farm Facility and/or the Calcined Solids Storage Facility following Resource Conservation and Recovery Act closure. In order to use the seven Bin Sets making up the Calcined Solids Storage Facility as a low-level waste landfill, the facility must first be closed to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) standards. This study identifies and discusses two basic methods available to close the Calcined Solids Storage Facility under the RCRA - Risk-Based Clean Closure and Closure to Landfill Standards. In addition to the closure methods, the regulatory requirements and issues associated with turning the Calcined Solids Storage Facility into an NRC low-level waste landfill or filling the bin voids with clean grout are discussed.

  9. Kent County Waste to Energy Facility Biomass Facility | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    County Waste to Energy Facility Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Kent County Waste to Energy Facility Biomass Facility Facility Kent County Waste to Energy...

  10. Stockton Regional Water Control Facility Biomass Facility | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Stockton Regional Water Control Facility Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Stockton Regional Water Control Facility Biomass Facility Facility Stockton Regional...

  11. Grout Facilities standby plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Claghorn, R.D.; Kison, P.F.; Nunamaker, D.R.; Yoakum, A.K.

    1994-09-29

    This plan defines how the Grout Facilities will be deactivated to meet the intent of the recently renegotiated Tri-Party Agreement (TPA). The TPA calls for the use of the grout process as an emergency option only in the event that tank space is not available to resolve tank safety issues. The availability of new tanks is expected by 1997. Since a grout startup effort would take an estimated two years, a complete termination of the Grout Disposal Program is expected in December 1995. The former Tank Waste Remediation (TWRS) Strategy, adopted in 1988, called for the contents of Hanford`s 28 newer double-shell waste tanks to be separated into high-level radioactive material to be vitrified and disposed of in a geologic repository; low-level wastes were to be sent to the Grout Facility to be made into a cement-like-mixture and poured into underground vaults at Hanford for disposal. The waste in the 149 older single-shell tanks (SST) were to undergo further study and analysis before a disposal decision was made.

  12. ARM - Facility News Article

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    December 4, 2010 [Facility News] Request for Proposals Now Open Bookmark and Share The ARM Climate Research Facility is now accepting applications for use of the ARM mobile facilities, aerial facility, and fixed sites. Proposals are welcome from all members of the scientific community for conducting field campaigns and scientific research using the ARM Facility. Facility availability is as follows: ARM Mobile Facility 2 (AMF2) available FY2013 ARM Mobile Facility 1 (AMF1) available March 2015

  13. Agreement Template for Energy Conservation and Demand Side Management...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Agreement Template for Energy Conservation and Demand Side Management Services Agreement Template for Energy Conservation and Demand Side Management Services Template agreement ...

  14. Unilateral Nondisclosure Agreement - NREL Disclosing - Sample

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    (Rev 07/09) Page 1 of 2 UNILATERAL (OUT) NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT No. XX - XXXX ("Agreement") This Agreement is entered into by and between the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC ("Alliance"), the Manager and Operator of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory ("NREL") under Prime Contract No. DE- AC36-08GO28308 for the U.S. Department of Energy (the "DOE"), located at 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401, and COMPANY NAME ("Company"),

  15. NREL Unilateral Nondisclosure Agreement - Company Disclosing - Sample

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    REV 07/09) Page 1 of 2 UNILATERAL (IN) NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT No. XX - XXXX ("Agreement") This Agreement is entered into by and between the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC ("Alliance"), the Manager and Operator of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory ("NREL") under Prime Contract No. DE- AC36-08GO28308 for the U.S. Department of Energy (the "DOE"), located at 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401, and DISCLOSING PARTY NAME

  16. ATR National Scientific User Facility 2009 Annual Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Todd R. Allen; Mitchell K. Meyer; Frances Marshall; Mary Catherine Thelen; Jeff Benson

    2010-11-01

    This report describes activities of the ATR NSUF from FY-2008 through FY-2009 and includes information on partner facilities, calls for proposals, users week and education programs. The report also contains project information on university research projects that were awarded by ATR NSUF in the fiscal years 2008 & 2009. This research is university-proposed researcher under a user facility agreement. All intellectual property from these experiments belongs to the university per the user agreement.

  17. On-Site Renewable Power Purchase Agreements for Renewable Energy Projects

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    An on-site renewable power purchase agreement (PPA) enables Federal agencies to fund a renewable energy project by contracting to purchase the power generated by the system. The renewable energy equipment is installed and owned by a developer but located on-site at the agency facility.

  18. FEMP Offers Training on Federal On-Site Renewable Power Purchase Agreements

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This refreshed eTraining core course provides federal energy and facility managers and contracting officers with up-to-date knowledge and best practices for developing an on-site renewable power purchase agreement (PPA) on a federal site and includes current definitions, references, and guidance to help launch or accelerate a PPA project.

  19. Appendices - 2004 WIPP Compliance Recertification Application

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Please note that these document are quite large in size and have been split into smaller sections. To navigate between sections, use hyperlinks as indicated by red boxes or blue text in the Table of Contents for each section. There are also hyperlinks at the top and bottom of each section. 2004 WIPP Compliance Recertification Application - Appendices DOE/WIPP 04-3231 March 2004 CRA - Appendices Appendix AUD - 2004 Appendix BARRIERS Appendix DATA Appendix MON-2004 Appendix MON-2004 - Attachment A

  20. 2004 WIPP Compliance Recertification Application - INDEX

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Back to Content Description Please note that these documents are quite large in size and have been split into smaller sections. To navigate between sections, use hyperlinks as indicated by red boxes or blue text in the Table of Contents for each section. There are also hyperlinks at the top and bottom of each section. 2004 WIPP Compliance Recertification Application - Main Volume DOE/WIPP 04-3231 March 2004 CRA - Main Letter to EPA Administrator Leavitt, from DOE Secretary Abraham Executive

  1. NPT Compliance | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Compliance | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog

  2. NMSLO Water Rights Agreement | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    NMSLO Water Rights AgreementLegal Published NA Year Signed or Took Effect 2012 Legal Citation Not provided DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online...

  3. Critical Materials Institute Affiliates Program MEMBER AGREEMENT

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    be in accordance to the DOE Work for Others (WFO) Class Patent Waiver and corresponding Master WFO agreement for work to be performed by the CMI with affiliate funds. Foreign...

  4. CNA: Compromise Agreement (2013-SE-1430)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE and CNA International, Inc., d/b/a MC Appliance Corp. entered into a Compromise Agreement to resolve a case involving the distribution in commerce of noncompliant freezers.

  5. Quick Guide: Power Purchase Agreements (Fact Sheet)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    2011-07-01

    Introduction to Federal power purchase agreements (PPAs), including available FEMP services and technical assistance as well as questions to ask when evaluating PPAs for a Federal renewable energy project.

  6. Quick Guide: Power Purchase Agreements (Fact Sheet)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    2010-06-01

    Introduction to Federal power purchase agreements (PPAs), including available FEMP services and technical assistance as well as questions to ask when evaluating PPAs for a Federal renewable energy project.

  7. OREM renews partnering agreement with UCOR

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Senior officials from the DOE's Oak Ridge Office of EM and UCOR met recently to renew their partnering agreement that clearly defines the working arrangement and expectations between the two organizations.

  8. NERSC Signs Supercomputing Agreement with Cray

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Signs Supercomputing Agreement with Cray NERSC Signs Supercomputing Agreement with Cray June 27, 2012 NERSC Contact: Linda Vu, lvu@lbl.gov, +1 510 495 2402 Cray Media: Nick Davis pr@cray.com +1 206 701 2123 The Department of Energy's National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) announced today that Cray will install its next-generation supercomputer computing system. Consisting of products and services, the multi-year, multi-phase project is valued at more than $40 million. It

  9. NETL Cooperative Research and Development Agreements

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Cooperative Research and Development Agreements Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA) allow for joint research and development performed by NETL and CRADA participant researchers. Background intellectual property (IP) protection is included for both parties, and CRADA developed IP is jointly owned. A CRADA offers participants the right of first refusal to an exclusive license for jointly developed IP. Cost sharing between NETL and the CRADA participant is essential. Small

  10. Bilateral Agreements with China | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Bilateral Agreements with China Bilateral Agreements with China Members of China's Shenhua Group visit FE's National Energy Technology Laboratory. Photo courtesy of NETL. Members of China's Shenhua Group visit FE's National Energy Technology Laboratory. Photo courtesy of NETL. Fossil Energy Protocol between the United States and China The U.S.-China Fossil Energy Protocol is intended to promote scientific and technological cooperation between the United States and China in the field of fossil

  11. Portsmouth Site Regulatory Agreements | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Site Regulatory Agreements Portsmouth Site Regulatory Agreements PDF icon Portsmouth Administrative Consent Order - 1997 PDF icon Portsmouth Ohio Consent Decree - 1989 PDF icon Portsmouth Removal Action and Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study and Remedial Design and Remedial Action (D&D Orders) Project Director's Final Findings and Order, Mods. 2011, 2012 PDF icon Portsmouth Integration Director's Final Findings and Order - 2011 PDF icon Portsmouth DUF6 Director's Final Findings and

  12. Programmatic Agreement for Colorado | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Programmatic Agreement for Colorado Programmatic Agreement for Colorado U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program (EECBG), Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP), State Energy Plan (SEP), Colorado State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), Colorado Governors Energy Office (GEO), historic preservation, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, National Register of Historic Places, National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), Programmatic

  13. NREL: Wind Research - Facilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Facilities Our facilities are designed to meet the wind industry's critical research needs with state-of-the-art design and testing facilities. NREL's unique and highly versatile facilities at the National Wind Technology Center offer research and analysis of wind turbine components and prototypes rated from 400 watts to 3 megawatts. Satellite facilities support the growth of wind energy development across the United States. National Wind Technology Center Facilities Our facilities are contained

  14. Portsmouth TSCA UE FFCA 02-20-1992 Compliance Agreement Modification 07-17-97_1.pdf

    Energy Savers [EERE]

  15. Alaska State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Alaska State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Alaska State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_ak.pdf More Documents & Publications Delaware State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Florida State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Louisiana

  16. Delaware State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Delaware State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Delaware State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_de.pdf More Documents & Publications Florida State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Louisiana State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Massachusetts State Historic

  17. Utah State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Utah State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Utah State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_ut.pdf More Documents & Publications Kansas State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Washington State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Virginia State Historic Preservation

  18. Virginia State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Virginia State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Virginia State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_va.pdf More Documents & Publications North Carolina State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Prototype Programmatic Agreement Between DOE, State Energy Offices, and State Historic

  19. Montana State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy Montana State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Montana State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_mt.pdf More Documents & Publications Delaware State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Florida State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Louisiana State Historic Preservation

  20. New Mexico State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy New Mexico State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement New Mexico State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_nm.pdf More Documents & Publications Delaware State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Florida State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Louisiana State Historic