Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

WDTS Budget | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Budget Budget Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) WDTS Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (24KB) Education Links WDTS Budget WDTS Committees of Visitors Jobs Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) Community College Internships (CCI) DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship (SCGF) Program External link Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship (AEF) Program Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) at DOE Laboratories DOE National Science Bowl® (NSB) Laboratory Equipment Donation Program (LEDP) Outreach Contact Information Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-8842 F: (202) 586-0019 E: sc.wdts@science.doe.gov

2

WDTS Budget | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

WDTS WDTS Budget Budget Budget Home About Budget by Program ASCR Budget BES Budget BER Budget FES Budget HEP Budget NP Budget WDTS Budget SLI & SS Budget SCPD Budget GAO Audit Reports External Links Contact Information Budget U.S. Department of Energy SC-41/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3541 F: (301) 903-9524 More Information » Budget by Program WDTS Budget Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The following links contain WDTS's budget request to Congress for current and prior years: FY2014 Budget Request to Congress .pdf file (453KB) FY2013 Budget Request to Congress .pdf file (127KB) FY2012 Budget Request to Congress .pdf file (311KB) FY2011 Budget Request to Congress .pdf file (278KB) FY2010 Budget Request to Congress .pdf file (402KB)

3

WDTS Committees of Visitors | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Committees Committees of Visitors Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) WDTS Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (24KB) Education Links WDTS Budget WDTS Committees of Visitors Jobs Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) Community College Internships (CCI) DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship (SCGF) Program External link Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship (AEF) Program Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) at DOE Laboratories DOE National Science Bowl® (NSB) Laboratory Equipment Donation Program (LEDP) Outreach Contact Information Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-8842 F: (202) 586-0019 E: sc.wdts@science.doe.gov

4

WDTS Committees of Visitors | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

WDTS Committees of Visitors WDTS Committees of Visitors Deputy Director for Science Programs Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Staff Presentations & Testimony Federal Advisory Committees Committees of Visitors ASCR Committees of Visitors BES Committees of Visitors BER Committees of Visitors FES Committees of Visitors HEP Committees of Visitors NP Committees of Visitors WDTS Committees of Visitors Contact Information Deputy Director for Science Programs U.S. Department of Energy SC-2/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5430 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov U.S. Department of Energy SC-2/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-5316 F: (301) 903-7780 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov

5

WDTS Application & Review System (WARS) Mentor Manual  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

WDTS Application & Review System (WARS) Mentor Manual #12;2 Table of Contents How To Log #12;3 Logging into the WDTS Mentor Portal To access the WDTS Mentor Portal, you must first have will be sent to your Lab email address · This email will be from wdts.dev@orau.org with the email subject line

Eisen, Michael

6

Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) Homepage | U.S.  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Programs » WDTS Home Programs » WDTS Home Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) WDTS Home About Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) Community College Internships (CCI) DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship (SCGF) Program External link Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship (AEF) Program Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) at DOE Laboratories DOE National Science Bowl® (NSB) Laboratory Equipment Donation Program (LEDP) Outreach Contact Information Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-8842 F: (202) 586-0019 E: sc.wdts@science.doe.gov The application process is now closed for the Summer Term of The Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) Program

7

DOE Site List  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Links Links Central Internet Database CID Photo Banner DOE Site List Site Geo Site Code State Operations Office1 DOE Programs Generating Streams at Site DOE Programs Managing Facilities Associated Data2 Acid/Pueblo Canyons ACPC NM Oak Ridge Waste/Media, Facilities Airport Substation CA Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Hill Communication Site CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Substation CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities AL Complex NM Albuquerque DP Facilities Alba Craft ALCL OH Oak Ridge Facilities Albany Research Center AMRC OR Oak Ridge Facilities Alcova Switchyard WY Western Area Power Administration Facilities Aliquippa Forge ALFO PA Oak Ridge Facilities

8

DOE Patents Database - Site Index  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Site Index Home Advanced Search About Patent News Recent Inventions Technology Transfer Resources DOE Innovations FAQ Help RSS Contact Us...

9

Liquefaction Evaluations at DOE Sites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LIQUEFACTION EVALUATIONS AT LIQUEFACTION EVALUATIONS AT DOE SITES M. Lewis, M. McHood, R. Williams, B. Gutierrez October 25, 2011 Agenda  Background  Purpose and Objective  Liquefaction Methods  Site Evaluations  Aging  Conclusions 2 Background 3 Liquefaction at DOE Sites Background  Liquefaction evaluations are required at all DOE sites  Methods have evolved over the years, but there is currently only one consensus methodology;  Youd et al., 2001  Two other methods have emerged in the last few years;  Cetin et al., 2004  Idriss & Boulanger, 2008 4 Background  Youd et al., was the result of two workshops (NCEER/NSF) held in the late 1990s, culminating in a NCEER report and a ASCE publication in 2001. The method is widely used.  Cetin et al., was the result of several doctoral

10

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ohio Mound, Ohio, Site A CERCLA andor RCRA Site MoundMap DOE has completed all remediation activities at the Mound site in accordance with applicable Comprehensive Environmental...

11

IDAHO SITE TO PROVIDE WASTE TREATMENT FOR OTHER DOE SITES  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

March 7, 2008 IDAHO SITE TO PROVIDE WASTE TREATMENT FOR OTHER DOE SITES Plan won't impact DOE commitment to removing all stored waste from Idaho Site Idaho's Advanced Mixed Waste...

12

DOE/EPA site demonstration  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This Health and Safety Plan applies to the technology demonstration of the Retech, Inc., centrifugal furnace under the US Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Innovative Evaluation (SITE) Program. Retech will conduct a series of furnace tests at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Component Development and Integration Facility (CDIF) in Butte, Montana. MSE, operating contractor of the CDIF, will evaluate the furnace technology and determine the feasibility of further testing based on these demonstrations. This plan applies to the field demonstration at DOE's CDIF. This plan is designed to cover most work assignment activities under the Retech furnace evaluation to ensure safe and healthful conditions. Specific guidance is necessary for workers at the CDIF for the entire demonstration, addressing each of the known or expected safety hazards and contaminants. The layout of the exclusion zone and decontamination areas at the CDIF has been incorporated into this plan. This plan has been prepared in accordance with applicable federal regulations, but should the regulations be changed or if other situations require, the plan will be modified by the SITE Program Health and Safety Manager. The following items are covered in the plan: organization and responsibilities for the demonstration; hazard evaluation of the technology, test waste, and test site; contamination control zones; standard operating procedures (SOP) for the demonstration; protective and emergency equipment; exposure monitoring during test operations; medical surveillance; applicable safety and health regulations; and, references. 6 refs., 2 figs.

Not Available

1989-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

13

Complexity of Groundwater Contaminants at DOE Sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for the remediation and long-term stewardship of one of the world's largest groundwater contamination portfolios, with a significant number of plumes containing various contaminants, and considerable total mass and activity. As of 1999, the DOE's Office of Environmental Management was responsible for remediation, waste management, or nuclear materials and facility stabilization at 144 sites in 31 states and one U.S. territory, out of which 109 sites were expected to require long-term stewardship. Currently, 19 DOE sites are on the National Priority List. The total number of contaminated plumes on DOE lands is estimated to be 10,000. However, a significant number of DOE sites have not yet been fully characterized. The most prevalent contaminated media are groundwater and soil, although contaminated sediment, sludge, and surface water also are present. Groundwater, soil, and sediment contamination are present at 72% of all DOE sites. A proper characterization of the contaminant inventory at DOE sites is critical for accomplishing one of the primary DOE missions -- planning basic research to understand the complex physical, chemical, and biological properties of contaminated sites. Note that the definitions of the terms 'site' and 'facility' may differ from one publication to another. In this report, the terms 'site,' 'facility' or 'installation' are used to identify a contiguous land area within the borders of a property, which may contain more than one plume. The term 'plume' is used here to indicate an individual area of contamination, which can be small or large. Even though several publications and databases contain information on groundwater contamination and remediation technologies, no statistical analyses of the contaminant inventory at DOE sites has been prepared since the 1992 report by Riley and Zachara. The DOE Groundwater Data Base (GWD) presents data as of 2003 for 221 groundwater plumes at 60 DOE sites and facilities. Note that Riley and Zachara analyzed the data from only 18 sites/facilities including 91 plumes. In this paper, we present the results of statistical analyses of the data in the GWD as guidance for planning future basic and applied research of groundwater contaminants within the DOE complex. Our analyses include the evaluation of a frequency and ranking of specific contaminants and contaminant groups, contaminant concentrations/activities and total contaminant masses and activities. We also compared the results from analyses of the GWD with those from the 1992 report by Riley and Zachara. The difference between our results and those summarized in the 1992 report by Riley and Zachara could be caused by not only additional releases, but also by the use of modern site characterization methods, which more accurately reveal the extent of groundwater contamination. Contaminated sites within the DOE complex are located in all major geographic regions of the United States, with highly variable geologic, hydrogeologic, soil, and climatic conditions. We assume that the information from the 60 DOE sites included in the GWD are representative for the whole DOE complex. These 60 sites include the major DOE sites and facilities, such as Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, Colorado; Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho; Savannah River Site, South Carolina; Oak Ridge Reservation, Tennessee; and Hanford Reservation, Washington. These five sites alone ccount for 71% of the value of the remediation work.

Hazen, T.C.; Faybishenko, B.; Jordan, P.

2010-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

14

DOE Site Facility Management Contracts Internet Posting | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Facility Management Contracts Internet Posting DOE Site Facility Management Contracts Internet Posting DOE-NNSA Site Facility Mgmt Contracts AUG 2013.pdf More Documents &...

15

Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Worker Safety and Health Assistance Worker Safety and Health Assistance Home Mission and Functions Voluntary Protection Program Employee Assistance Program for DOE Contractor and Subcontractor Workers Technical Assistance Rulemaking Human Reliability Program Technical Assistance Rulemaking Health and Safety HSS Logo Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites Employee Assistance Program For DOE Contractor and Subcontractor Workers The DOE Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for DOE contractor and subcontractor workers complements the DOE medical and psychological evaluations and surveillance program. The EAP provides contractor workers who are experiencing personal problems with an opportunity to receive appropriate treatment and support. The goal of the EAP is to provide a conduit through which the individual can resolve personal and workplace problems. The HSS EAP Manager aids the DOE contracting organizations to maintain a healthy and productive workforce.

16

DOE Awards Small Business Contract for Site Characterization...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Awards Small Business Contract for Site Characterization and Erosion Control Work in Los Alamos, New Mexico DOE Awards Small Business Contract for Site Characterization and...

17

Erosion Control and Revegetation at DOE's Lowman Disposal Site...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Erosion Control and Revegetation at DOE's Lowman Disposal Site, Lowman, Idaho Erosion Control and Revegetation at DOE's Lowman Disposal Site, Lowman, Idaho Erosion Control and...

18

Site characterization criteria (DOE-STD-1022-94) for natural phenomena hazards at DOE sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper briefly summarizes requirements of site characterization for Natural Phenomena Hazards (NPH) at DOE sites. In order to comply with DOE Order 5480.28, site characterization criteria has been developed to provide site-specific information needed for development of NPH assessment criteria. Appropriate approaches are outlined to ensure that the current state-of-the-art methodologies and procedures are used in the site characterization. General and detailed site characterization requirements are provided in the areas of meteorology, hydrology, geology, seismology and geotechnical studies.

Chen, J.C.; Ueng, T.S.; Boissonnade, A.C.

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

Natural phenomena hazards assessment criteria for DOE sites: DOE Standard DOE-STD-1023-95  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper summarizes hazard assessment criteria (DOE-STD-1023-95) for Natural Phenomena Hazards (NPH) at DOE sites. The DOE has established policy and requirements for NPH mitigation for DOE sites and facilities using a graded approach by DOE Order 5480.28. The graded approach is implemented by five performance categories established for structures, systems, and components (SSCs) at DOE facilities based on criteria provided by DOE-STD-1021-93. In applying the design/evaluation criteria of DOE-STD-1020-94 for DOE facilities subjected to one of the natural phenomena hazards, the establishment of design basis load levels consistent with the corresponding performance category is required. This standard provides general criteria as well as specific criteria for natural phenomena hazard assessments to ensure that adequate design basis load levels are established for design and/or evaluation of DOE facilities.

Chen, J.C.; Lu, S.C.; Boissonnade, A.C. [and others

1995-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

20

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Site  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Site Fairfield Site Falls City Site Fernald Preserve Gasbuggy Site General Atomics Geothermal Gnome-Coach Site Grand Junction Sites Granite City Site Green River Site Gunnison...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Between DOE/NNSA Sandia Site Office And DOE/NNSA Pantex Site Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Agreement Agreement Between DOE/NNSA Sandia Site Office And DOE/NNSA Pantex Site Office Weapons Evaluation Test Laboratory Approved by: '1--lS'-0't R~\JJ~ Date !f1~ Dae PSXO/SSO WETL MOA September 2009 Memorandum of Agreement for Weapons Evaluation Test Laboratory This Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is entered into by the Pantex Site Office (PXSO) and the Sandia Site Office (SSO) for operation of the Weapons Evaluation Test Laboratory (WETL) at the Pantex Site. The MOA references operations, support, and requirements to be met by the Pantex Managing and Operating (M&O) Contractor and the Sandia Corporation (Sandia) pursuant to their respective prime contracts with Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA). Purpose The purpose of this document is to set forth the roles, responsibilities, authorities and accountabilities with

22

DOE Moab Site Cost-Effectively Eliminates 200 Million Gallons...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Moab Site Cost-Effectively Eliminates 200 Million Gallons of Contaminated Ground Water DOE Moab Site Cost-Effectively Eliminates 200 Million Gallons of Contaminated Ground Water...

23

DOE's Former Rocky Flats Weapons Production Site to Become National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Former Rocky Flats Weapons Production Site to Become National Wildlife Refuge DOE's Former Rocky Flats Weapons Production Site to Become National Wildlife Refuge July 12, 2007 -...

24

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- SiteA  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site A D&D Program Site siteamap As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Site APlot M...

25

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oak Ridge TN Warehouse Site...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Warehouses Site. This site is managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. Aerial photograph of the Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Site TN.09-1 - DOE...

26

DOE and Colorado Mesa University Education Agreement Expands LM's Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Colorado Mesa University Education Agreement Expands LM's and Colorado Mesa University Education Agreement Expands LM's Site Reuse Portfolio DOE and Colorado Mesa University Education Agreement Expands LM's Site Reuse Portfolio October 16, 2012 - 2:49pm Addthis Rich Bush, DOE Site Manager, explains the Grand Junction, Colorado, Disposal Site to Colorado Mesa University students. Rich Bush, DOE Site Manager, explains the Grand Junction, Colorado, Disposal Site to Colorado Mesa University students. DOE Site Manager Rich Bush explains the Enhanced Cover Assessment Project to Colorado Mesa University students while standing next to one of LM’s Systems Operation and Analysis at Remote Sites locations, which collects data remotely and transmits it to LM servers daily. DOE Site Manager Rich Bush explains the Enhanced Cover Assessment Project

27

DOE-Evaluating A Potential Microhydro Site | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

DOE-Evaluating A Potential Microhydro Site DOE-Evaluating A Potential Microhydro Site Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: DOE-Evaluating A Potential Microhydro Site Agency/Company /Organization: United States Department of Energy Sector: Energy Focus Area: Renewable Energy, Water Power Topics: Co-benefits assessment, - Energy Access Resource Type: Guide/manual, Training materials Website: www.energysavers.gov/your_home/electricity/index.cfm/mytopic=11070 Cost: Free Language: English DOE-Evaluating A Potential Microhydro Site Screenshot References: DOE-Evaluating A Potential Microhydro Site[1] Logo: DOE-Evaluating A Potential Microhydro Site "To build a microhydropower system, you need access to flowing water on your property. A sufficient quantity of falling water must be available,

28

Second Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site Completed; Report Now Available Online Second Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site Completed; Report Now Available Online February 3, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Danielle Miller (DOE-ID) 208-526-5709 An Idaho Cleanup Project team has completed work on the site-wide five-year review of cleanup at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Idaho site. "This report verifies that the performance of cleanup actions at the Idaho Site continues to be protective of human health and the environment," said Nicole Hernandez, DOE's project manager for the five-year review. "The findings in the report demonstrate a strong collaborative effort by CH2M-WG Idaho (CWI), DOE, the Environmental

29

DOE Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site DOE Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site January 18, 2006 - 10:49am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S....

30

Lessons learned with ISO 14001 at DOE sites  

SciTech Connect

ISO 14001 is the international standard for environmental management systems (EMS). The standard applies the `plan, do, check, act` management system model to assure that the environmental impacts of operations are fully considered in planning and facility operations. ISO 14001 has grown in popularity in both the public and the private sector and has seen increasing utility within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). While there is no final DOE policy or requirement for ISO 14001 EMS implementation, ISO 14001 commands an active presence at many DOE sites. In general, the impetus for ISO 14001 in the DOE complex has been either an initiative by site management contractors to improve performance, or an actual requirement in the new management contracts for the sites. Several DOE sites now are committed to implement EMS`s in conformance with ISO 14001: Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Hanford, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), Kansas City Plant, Nevada Test Site, Savannah River Site (SRS), Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP), West Valley. Several other DOE sites are expected to proceed in the near future with an EMS consistent with ISO 14001. However, not all sites are proceeding with an ISO 14001 EMS based on individual site business considerations. This paper describes the status of EMS implementation at these sites and identifies lessons learned that may be of use to other DOE sites.

Wilkinson, C. H., LLNL

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

31

DOE Solar Decathlon: News Blog Web sites  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Energy Solar Decathlon is prepping for Solar Decathlon 2011, and the first step is a Web site makeover. You've probably noticed the Web site has a new look, but that's not all...

32

Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites Employee Assistance Program For DOE Contractor and Subcontractor Workers The DOE Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for DOE contractor and subcontractor workers complements the DOE medical and psychological evaluations and surveillance program. The EAP provides contractor workers who are experiencing personal problems with an opportunity to receive appropriate treatment and support. The goal of the EAP is to provide a conduit through which the individual can resolve personal and workplace problems. The HSS EAP Manager aids the DOE contracting organizations to maintain a healthy and productive workforce. The Office of Worker Safety and Health Assistance (HS-12) provides

33

Education Links | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Education Links Education Links Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) WDTS Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (24KB) Education Links WDTS Budget WDTS Committees of Visitors Jobs Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) Community College Internships (CCI) DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship (SCGF) Program External link Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship (AEF) Program Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) at DOE Laboratories DOE National Science Bowl® (NSB) Laboratory Equipment Donation Program (LEDP) Outreach Contact Information Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-8842 F: (202) 586-0019 E: sc.wdts@science.doe.gov

34

Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Jobs Jobs Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) WDTS Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (24KB) Education Links WDTS Budget WDTS Committees of Visitors Jobs Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) Community College Internships (CCI) DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship (SCGF) Program External link Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship (AEF) Program Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) at DOE Laboratories DOE National Science Bowl® (NSB) Laboratory Equipment Donation Program (LEDP) Outreach Contact Information Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-8842 F: (202) 586-0019 E: sc.wdts@science.doe.gov About

35

About | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

About About Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) WDTS Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (24KB) Education Links WDTS Budget WDTS Committees of Visitors Jobs Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) Community College Internships (CCI) DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship (SCGF) Program External link Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship (AEF) Program Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) at DOE Laboratories DOE National Science Bowl® (NSB) Laboratory Equipment Donation Program (LEDP) Outreach Contact Information Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-8842 F: (202) 586-0019 E: sc.wdts@science.doe.gov

36

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Site  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio Ohio Mound, Ohio, Site This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Annual Institutional Controls Report Long-Term Stewardship Site Transition Plan Site Sales Agreement Internal Links Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Administrative Records External Links Mound Development Corporation (MDC) Ohio Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Request a paper copy of any document by submitting a Document Request. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Community Involvement General Site Documents

37

DOE/ORO/2119 Oak Ridge Reservation Annual Site  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

#12;#12;DOE/ORO/2119 Oak Ridge Reservation Annual Site Environmental Report for 2000 on the World Lyttle W. Koncinski Gail Sweeden Project manager, DOE-ORO T. W. Joseph, Ph.D. Technical support C. E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-27 2.2.18 Implementation Status of DOE Order 435

Pennycook, Steve

38

DOE/ORO/2218 Oak Ridge Reservation Annual Site  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

........................................................... 4-22 4.13 Percentage of DOE derived concentration guides for ETTP surface water monitoring locations#12;#12;#12;DOE/ORO/2218 Oak Ridge Reservation Annual Site Environmental Report for 2005 Phillips Walter Koncinski Sherri Cotter Jane Parrott Project manager, DOE-ORO David Page Date published

Pennycook, Steve

39

Safety Oversight of Decommissioning Activities at DOE Nuclear Sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) is an independent federal agency established by Congress in 1988 to provide nuclear safety oversight of activities at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) defense nuclear facilities. The activities under the Board's jurisdiction include the design, construction, startup, operation, and decommissioning of defense nuclear facilities at DOE sites. This paper reviews the Board's safety oversight of decommissioning activities at DOE sites, identifies the safety problems observed, and discusses Board initiatives to improve the safety of decommissioning activities at DOE sites. The decommissioning of former defense nuclear facilities has reduced the risk of radioactive material contamination and exposure to the public and site workers. In general, efforts to perform decommissioning work at DOE defense nuclear sites have been successful, and contractors performing decommissioning work have a good safety record. Decommissioning activities have recently been completed at sites identified for closure, including the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, the Fernald Closure Project, and the Miamisburg Closure Project (the Mound site). The Rocky Flats and Fernald sites, which produced plutonium parts and uranium materials for defense needs (respectively), have been turned into wildlife refuges. The Mound site, which performed R and D activities on nuclear materials, has been converted into an industrial and technology park called the Mound Advanced Technology Center. The DOE Office of Legacy Management is responsible for the long term stewardship of these former EM sites. The Board has reviewed many decommissioning activities, and noted that there are valuable lessons learned that can benefit both DOE and the contractor. As part of its ongoing safety oversight responsibilities, the Board and its staff will continue to review the safety of DOE and contractor decommissioning activities at DOE defense nuclear sites.

Zull, Lawrence M.; Yeniscavich, William [Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Ave., NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901 (United States)

2008-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

40

DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County December 20, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Salony, DOE 509-376-0402, Cameron.Salony@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a contract to the Benton County Sheriff's Office in Kennewick, Wash., to provide law enforcement services at the DOE Hanford Site. The contract has a five-year period of performance, consisting of a one-year base period, with four one-year option periods and an approximate total value of $5 million. As the law enforcement contractor, the sheriff's office will: Ensure site employees obey traffic laws Investigate suspected or reported violations of law Apprehend and arrest those suspected of committing violations of law

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- SiteA  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Illinois Illinois Site A/Plot M, Illinois, Decommissioned Reactor Site A D&D Program Site sitea_map As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Site A/Plot M Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Site A/Plot M site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Inspection/Sampling Schedule Site A/Plot M Decommissioned Reactor Mapping and Monitoring (GEMS)

42

Site characterization criteria (DOE-STD-1022-94) for natural phenomena hazards at DOE sites. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This paper briefly summarizes requirements of site characterization for Natural Phenomena Hazards (NPH) at DOE sites. In order to comply with DOE Order 5480.28, site characterization criteria has been developed to provide site-specific information needed for development of NPH assessment criteria. Appropriate approaches are outlined to ensure that the current state-of-the-art methodologies and procedures are used in the site characterization. General and detailed site characterization requirements are provided in the areas of meteorology, hydrology, geology, seismology and geotechnical studies.

Chen, J.C.; Ueng, Tzou-Shin; Boissonnade, A.C.

1995-03-23T23:59:59.000Z

43

Site characterization and hazard assessment criteria for natural phenomena hazards at DOE sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper briefly summarizes requirements for site characterization and hazard assessment of Natural Phenomena Hazards for compliance with DOE Order 5480.28. The site characterization criteria for NPH evaluation are provided in a draft DOE-STD-1022-XX and the assessment criteria of natural phenomena hazards are provided in draft DOE-STD-1023-XX.

Chen, J.C.; Lu, S.C.; Ueng, T.S.; Boissonnade, A.C.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

DOE Awards Small Business Contract for Site Characterization and Erosion  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Awards Small Business Contract for Site Characterization and DOE Awards Small Business Contract for Site Characterization and Erosion Control Work in Los Alamos, New Mexico DOE Awards Small Business Contract for Site Characterization and Erosion Control Work in Los Alamos, New Mexico September 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Lynette Chafin, 513-246-0461 Lynette.Chafin@emcbc.doe.gov Cincinnati - The Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a new contract to CTI & Associates, of Wixom, MI. CTI is a small business. The Department will issue a time and material type contract with a three year period of performance and a not-to-exceed value of $2,249,264. Work performed under this contract will be performed at the contractor's facilities and at the Los Alamos National Lab in Los Alamos, NM. The work performed under this contract includes site characterization and

45

NNSA labs, sites receive DOE Sustainability Awards | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

labs, sites receive DOE Sustainability Awards | National Nuclear labs, sites receive DOE Sustainability Awards | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > NNSA labs, sites receive DOE Sustainability Awards NNSA labs, sites receive DOE Sustainability Awards Posted By Office of Public Affairs In keeping with NNSA's commitment to improving the way it does business,

46

DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Hanford Site Occupational  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Hanford Site Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Hanford Site Occupational Medical Services - Agency Solicits Input from Industry, Stakeholders, and Workforce DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Hanford Site Occupational Medical Services - Agency Solicits Input from Industry, Stakeholders, and Workforce July 19, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Geoff Tyree, DOE Geoffrey.Tyree@rl..doe.gov 509-376-4171 The Department of Energy today issued a Draft Request for Proposals (RFP) for an Occupational Medical Services acquisition at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The Draft RFP is one step in the process toward awarding a contract and provides an opportunity for companies, Hanford stakeholders, and the site's workforce to provide input on the Draft RFP. DOE will provide

47

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maryland Disposal Site - MD 05  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Maryland Disposal Site - MD 05 Maryland Disposal Site - MD 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MARYLAND DISPOSAL SITE (MD.05 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Baltimore - Vicinity , Maryland MD.05-1 Evaluation Year: 1989 MD.05-1 Site Operations: Proposed disposal site - never developed. MD.05-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to MARYLAND DISPOSAL SITE MD.05-1 - Report (DOE/OR/20722-131 Revision 0); Site Plan for the Maryland Disposal Site; April 1989 Historical documents may contain links which are no longer valid or to

48

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Trinity Test Site - NM 17  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Trinity Test Site - NM 17 Trinity Test Site - NM 17 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TRINITY TEST SITE (NM.17 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - U.S. Army controls site Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: missile range - 30 miles west of Carrizozo , White Sands , New Mexico NM.17-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 NM.17-1 Site Operations: Detonation of the first atomic bomb occurred at this site. NM.17-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated NM.17-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Fission fragments NM.17-1 Radiological Survey(s): NM.17-1 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - U.S. Army controls site NM.17-1 Also see Documents Related to TRINITY TEST SITE NM.17-1 - DOE Memorandum/Checklist; Jones to File; Subject:

49

DOE HSPD-12 Card Issuance Site Performance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

13111 Y-12 Site 6881 6,881 6881 6847 6530 6463 100% 100% 95% 94% As of 3411 Kansas City Plant Honeywell Kirtland 2,667 2,667 2667 2665 2640 2601 100% 100% 99% 98% As of 3...

50

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- St Louis Airport Site Vicinity  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

St Louis Airport Site Vicinity St Louis Airport Site Vicinity Properties - 017 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: St. Louis Airport Site Vicinity Properties (017) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: These properties are located in Hazelwood and Berkeley, Missouri, approximately 15 miles northwest of downtown St. Louis. The properties are associated with the St. Louis Airport Site. The Manhattan Engineer District (MED), a predecessor agency of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), acquired the St. Louis Airport Site in 1946. The site was operated by the MED and the Atomic Energy Commission (the successor agency to the MED and a

51

Waste to Energy Power Production at DOE and DOD Sites  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Waste to Energy Power Production Waste to Energy Power Production at DOE and DOD Sites January 13, 2011 Overview - Federal Agency Innovations DOE: S avannah River S ite * Biomass Heat and Power US AF: Hill Air Force Base * Landfill Gas to Energy Generation Ameresco independent DOES avannah River S ite DOES avannah River S ite (DOE-S R) * Georgia / S outh Carolina border * 300+ sq miles extending into 3 counties * Began operations in 1950s Challenges faced by DOE-S R * Aging Infrastructure Ameresco independent * Coal and fuel oil power plants * Increased / new clean air requirements * New energy efficiency / sustainability requirements Business Case Analysis S ite need for both steam and power Repair, renovate, or replace Mandates and desire for renewable energy solution Appropriated funds not available

52

Building Removal Ongoing at DOE's Paducah Site | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Building Removal Ongoing at DOE's Paducah Site Building Removal Ongoing at DOE's Paducah Site Building Removal Ongoing at DOE's Paducah Site August 23, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Buz Smith Robert.Smith@lex.doe.gov 270-441-6821 PADUCAH, KY - Work is ongoing at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP) to raze a 65,000-square-foot facility known as the C-340 Metals Plant, which was used to make uranium metal during the Cold War. Department of Energy (DOE) cleanup contractor LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky began removing more than 1,500 panels of cement-asbestos siding from the Metals Plant complex Wednesday in anticipation of New Jersey-based LVI Services starting demolition Sept. 19. Demolition work is projected to last through the end of calendar 2012. "This is an important milestone because the C-340 Metals Plant is the

53

DOE Issues Final Mercury Storage Environmental Impact Statement: Texas Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Issues Final Mercury Storage Environmental Impact Statement: DOE Issues Final Mercury Storage Environmental Impact Statement: Texas Site Is Preferred for Long-Term Mercury Storage DOE Issues Final Mercury Storage Environmental Impact Statement: Texas Site Is Preferred for Long-Term Mercury Storage January 19, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON - The Department of Energy has prepared a Final Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Environmental Impact Statement to analyze the potential environmental, human health, and socioeconomic impacts of elemental mercury storage at seven locations. Based on these factors, DOE identified the Waste Control Specialists, LLC, site near Andrews, Texas, as the preferred alternative for long-term management and storage of mercury. DOE will consider the environmental impact information presented in this

54

DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County December 20, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Salony, DOE 509-376-0402, Cameron.Salony@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a contract to the Benton County Sheriff's Office in Kennewick, Wash., to provide law enforcement services at the DOE Hanford Site. The contract has a five-year period of performance, consisting of a one-year base period, with four one-year option periods and an approximate total value of $5 million. As the law enforcement contractor, the sheriff's office will: Ensure site employees obey traffic laws Investigate suspected or reported violations of law Apprehend and arrest those suspected of committing violations of law

55

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Durango Mill Site - CO 0...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Dayvault Dr. Laura Kilpatrick November 15, 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Bidders Conference and Site VisitU.S. Department of Energy (DOE)...

56

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE O 425.1D through PXSO Procedure 425.1BC, Pantex Site Office Startup and Restart of Pantex Plant Activities to provide PXSO confidence that the readiness review program is...

57

DOE site performance assessment activities. Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Information on performance assessment capabilities and activities was collected from eight DOE sites. All eight sites either currently dispose of low-level radioactive waste (LLW) or plan to dispose of LLW in the near future. A survey questionnaire was developed and sent to key individuals involved in DOE Order 5820.2A performance assessment activities at each site. The sites surveyed included: Hanford Site (Hanford), Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site (NTS), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (Paducah), Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (Portsmouth), and Savannah River Site (SRS). The questionnaire addressed all aspects of the performance assessment process; from waste source term to dose conversion factors. This report presents the information developed from the site questionnaire and provides a comparison of site-specific performance assessment approaches, data needs, and ongoing and planned activities. All sites are engaged in completing the radioactive waste disposal facility performance assessment required by DOE Order 5820.2A. Each site has achieved various degrees of progress and have identified a set of critical needs. Within several areas, however, the sites identified common needs and questions.

Not Available

1990-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

58

DOE/ORO/2296 Oak Ridge Reservation Annual Site  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

at DOE sites pursuant to DOE P 450.4, Safety Management System Policy. BJC uses its ISMS to implement their commitment to an Integrated Safety Management Systems (ISMS). The objective of the ISMS is to systematically improvement. Environmental protection considerations, as part of the ETTP ISMS, have taken on a new focus

Pennycook, Steve

59

DOE Honors Safety Star: Department's Program Honors Portsmouth Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Honors Safety Star: Department's Program Honors Portsmouth DOE Honors Safety Star: Department's Program Honors Portsmouth Site Contractor Employee for Promoting Safety Excellence DOE Honors Safety Star: Department's Program Honors Portsmouth Site Contractor Employee for Promoting Safety Excellence September 11, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Wastren-EnergX Mission Support (WEMS) Senior Safety Engineer Marsha Bevins, left, stands with DOE Director of Worker Safety and Health Brad Davy while holding her Voluntary Protection Program Contractor Champion of the Year award and the 2012 Star of Excellence award WEMS received. Wastren-EnergX Mission Support (WEMS) Senior Safety Engineer Marsha Bevins, left, stands with DOE Director of Worker Safety and Health Brad Davy while holding her Voluntary Protection Program Contractor Champion of the Year

60

DOE Awards Small Business Contract for Site Characterization and Erosion  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Characterization and Site Characterization and Erosion Control Work in Los Alamos, New Mexico DOE Awards Small Business Contract for Site Characterization and Erosion Control Work in Los Alamos, New Mexico September 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Lynette Chafin, 513-246-0461 Lynette.Chafin@emcbc.doe.gov Cincinnati - The Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a new contract to CTI & Associates, of Wixom, MI. CTI is a small business. The Department will issue a time and material type contract with a three year period of performance and a not-to-exceed value of $2,249,264. Work performed under this contract will be performed at the contractor's facilities and at the Los Alamos National Lab in Los Alamos, NM. The work performed under this contract includes site characterization and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

DOE Standard Natural Phenomena Hazards Site Characterization Criteria  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-94 2-94 March 1994 Change Notice No. 1 January 1996 Reaffirmed with Errata April 2002 DOE STANDARD NATURAL PHENOMENA HAZARDS SITE CHARACTERIZATION CRITERIA U.S. Department of Energy AREA FACR Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Environment Safety and Health Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4376, Fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-1022-94 ERRATA FOR DOE-STD-1022-94 REVISED FOREWORD ADDED REFERENCE TO DOE G 420.1-2

62

LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP AT DOE HANFORD SITE - 12575  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site is located in southeast Washington and consists of 1,518 square kilometers (586 square miles) of land. Established in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project, Hanford workers produced plutonium for our nation's nuclear defense program until the mid 1980's. Since then, the site has been in cleanup mode that is being accomplished in phases. As we achieve remedial objectives and complete active cleanup, DOE will manage Hanford land under the Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) Program until completion of cleanup and the site becomes ready for transfer to the post cleanup landlord - currently planned for DOE's Office of Legacy Management (LM). We define Hanford's LTS Program in the ''Hanford Long-Term Stewardship Program Plan,'' (DOE/RL-201 0-35)[1], which describes the scope including the relationship between the cleanup projects and the LTS Program. DOE designed the LTS Program to manage and provide surveillance and maintenance (S&M) of institutional controls and associated monitoring of closed waste sites to ensure the protection of human health and the environment. DOE's Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and Hanford cleanup and operations contractors collaboratively developed this program over several years. The program's scope also includes 15 key activities that are identified in the DOE Program Plan (DOE/RL-2010-35). The LTS Program will transition 14 land segments through 2016. The combined land mass is approximately 570 square kilometers (220 square miles), with over 1,300 active and inactive waste sites and 3,363 wells. Land segments vary from buffer zone property with no known contamination to cocooned reactor buildings, demolished support facilities, and remediated cribs and trenches. DOE-RL will transition land management responsibilities from cleanup contractors to the Mission Support Contract (MSC), who will then administer the LTS Program for DOE-RL. This process requires an environment of cooperation between the contractors and DOE-RL. Information Management (IM) is a key part of the LTS program. The IM Program identifies, locates, stores, protects and makes accessible Hanford LTS records and data to support the transfer of property ultimately to LM. As such, DOE-RL manages the Hanford LTS Program in a manner consistent with LM's goals, policies, and procedures.

MOREN RJ; GRINDSTAFF KD

2012-01-11T23:59:59.000Z

63

Stimulus Funding Creating Cleanup Jobs At DOE?s Idaho Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Stimulus Funding Creating Cleanup Jobs At DOEs Idaho Site Arimo resident Jeff Johnson did something this week he hasnt done since January. He reported to his new job. Funding...

64

DOE's Former Rocky Flats Weapons Production Site to Become National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Former Rocky Flats Weapons Production Site to Become National Former Rocky Flats Weapons Production Site to Become National Wildlife Refuge DOE's Former Rocky Flats Weapons Production Site to Become National Wildlife Refuge July 12, 2007 - 2:54pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the transfer of nearly 4,000 acres of its former Rocky Flats nuclear weapons production site to the Department of the Interior's (DOI) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for use as a National Wildlife Refuge. After more than a decade of environmental cleanup work, the transfer creates the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge, 16 miles northwest of Denver, Colorado, and marks completion of the regulatory milestones to transform a formerly contaminated site into an environmental asset. "The Department of Energy's environmental cleanup of the Rocky Flats

65

DOE Issues Final Environmental Impact Statement for Moab, Utah Site |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Impact Statement for Moab, Utah Site Environmental Impact Statement for Moab, Utah Site DOE Issues Final Environmental Impact Statement for Moab, Utah Site July 25, 2005 - 2:27pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued its final environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project Site, located on the bank of the Colorado River. The EIS details the preferred option of removal of the tailings pile and contaminated materials, along with ground water remediation. The tailings will be moved, predominately by rail, to the proposed Crescent Junction, Utah, site, more than 30 miles from the Colorado River. "Taking all facts into account, we believe the recommendations issued today provide the best solution to cleaning up Moab and protecting the River,"

66

Collaboration in long-term stewardship at DOE Hanford Site  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site comprises approximately 1,517 km{sup 2} (586 mi{sup 2}) of land in southeastern Washington. The site was established in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project to produce plutonium for the nation's nuclear weapons program. As the Cold War era came to an end, the mission of the site transitioned from weapons production to environmental cleanup. As the River Corridor area of the site cleanup is completed, the mission for that portion of the site will transition from active cleanup to continued protection of environment through the Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) Program. The key to successful transition from cleanup to LTS is the unique collaboration among three (3) different DOE Programs and three (3) different prime contractors with each contractor having different contracts. The LTS Program at the site is a successful model of collaboration resulting in efficient resolution of issues and accelerated progress that supports DOE's Richland Office 2015 Vision for the Hanford Site. The 2015 Vision for the Hanford Site involves shrinking the active cleanup footprint of the surface area of the site to approximately 20 mi{sup 2} on the Central Plateau. Hanford's LTS Program is defined in DOE's planning document, Hanford Long-Term Stewardship Program Plan, DOE/RL-2010-35 Rev 1. The Plan defines the relationship and respective responsibilities between the federal cleanup projects and the LTS Program along with their respective contractors. The LTS Program involves these different parties (cleanup program and contractors) who must work together to achieve the objective for transition of land parcels. Through the collaborative efforts with the prime contractors on site over the past two years, 253.8 km{sup 2} (98 mi{sup 2}) of property has been successfully transitioned from the cleanup program to the LTS Program upon completion of active surface cleanup. Upcoming efforts in the near term will include transitioning another large parcel that includes one of the six (6) cocooned reactors on site. These accomplishments relied upon the transparency between DOE cleanup programs and their contractors working together to successfully transition the land while addressing the challenges that arise. All parties, the three different DOE Programs and their respective prime contractors are dedicated to working together and continuing the progress of transitioning land to LTS, in alignment with the Program Plan and compliant with contractual requirements. This paper highlights the accomplishments and collaborative efforts to address the challenges faced as work progresses from the cleanup to transitioning of land parcels to LTS Program.

Moren, R. J.; Zeisloft, J. H.; Feist, E. T.; Brown, D.; Grindstaff, K. D.

2013-01-10T23:59:59.000Z

67

Recovery Act Investment Accelerates Cleanup Work at DOE's Paducah Site |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Investment Accelerates Cleanup Work at DOE's Paducah Investment Accelerates Cleanup Work at DOE's Paducah Site Recovery Act Investment Accelerates Cleanup Work at DOE's Paducah Site July 15, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis UF6 piping deactivation The black inlet hose is attached to a negative air machine that allows Feed Plant cleanup workers to safely deactivate uranium hexafluoride (UF6) piping, seen at right of the lift supporting the crew. UF6 piping deactivation The black inlet hose is attached to a negative air machine that allows Feed Plant cleanup workers to safely deactivate uranium hexafluoride (UF6) piping, seen at right of the lift supporting the crew. Heavy equipment demo Heavy equipment demolishes the last part of the eastern third of the Feed Plant at the Paducah Site. Cleanup continues to prepare the remaining part of the complex, backgroundfor demolition later.

68

DOE Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site DOE Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site January 18, 2006 - 10:49am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued the waste determination for the treatment and stabilization of low activity salt-waste at the Savannah River Site allowing for significant reductions in environmental and health risks posed by the material. Stored in forty-nine underground tanks, approximately 36 million gallons of radioactive waste is left over from plutonium production during the Cold War. In addition, the department issued an amended Record of Decision and Implementation Plan to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. "Today's announcement clears the way for the removal and treatment of this

69

Floodplain modeling for Paddy's Run at the DOE Fernald Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The restoration work for an intermittent stream, Paddy's Run, in the boundaries of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fernald Site, Ohio, managed by Fluor Fernald, involved floodplain expansion and the installation of grade control structures. Floodplain ... Keywords: Fernald, HEC-RAS, RiverCAD, floodplain, surface water

Marek H. Zaluski; Mark A. Ewanic; Steve D. Dunstan

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

Darwin: The Third DOE ARM TWP ARCS Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Darwin: The Third DOE ARM TWP ARCS Site Darwin: The Third DOE ARM TWP ARCS Site W. E. Clements and L. Jones Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico T. Baldwin Special Services Unit Australian Bureau of Meteorology Melbourne, Australia K. Nitschke South Pacific Regional Environment Programme Apia, Samoa Introduction The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program began operations in its Tropical Western Pacific (TWP) locale in October 1996 when the first Atmospheric Radiation and Cloud Station (ARCS) began collecting data on Manus Island in Papua New Guinea (PNG). Two years later, in November 1998 a second ARCS began operations on the island of Nauru in the Central Pacific. Now a third ARCS has begun collecting data in Darwin, Australia. See Figure 1 for

71

DOE Honors Safety Star: Department's Program Honors Portsmouth Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Star: Department's Program Honors Portsmouth Safety Star: Department's Program Honors Portsmouth Site Contractor Employee for Promoting Safety Excellence DOE Honors Safety Star: Department's Program Honors Portsmouth Site Contractor Employee for Promoting Safety Excellence September 11, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Wastren-EnergX Mission Support (WEMS) Senior Safety Engineer Marsha Bevins, left, stands with DOE Director of Worker Safety and Health Brad Davy while holding her Voluntary Protection Program Contractor Champion of the Year award and the 2012 Star of Excellence award WEMS received. Wastren-EnergX Mission Support (WEMS) Senior Safety Engineer Marsha Bevins, left, stands with DOE Director of Worker Safety and Health Brad Davy while holding her Voluntary Protection Program Contractor Champion of the Year

72

DOE Awards Hanford Site Occupational Medical Services Contract | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Occupational Medical Services Contract Occupational Medical Services Contract DOE Awards Hanford Site Occupational Medical Services Contract June 8, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Hardy 509-308-4947 Cameron.hardy@rl.gov Cincinnati - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that HPM Corporation, of Kennewick, Washington has been awarded an estimated $99 million contract to provide Occupational Medical Services at the DOE Hanford Site. HPM is a certified minority-owned, women-owned small business. This is a two-year hybrid contract with four-one-year option periods that includes firm-fixed price with award fee, cost reimbursement, and Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) components. As the Occupational Medical Services Contractor, HPM Corporation will: Provide occupational medical services to approximately 8,000

73

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Grand Junction Sites  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Site Fairfield Site Falls City Site Fernald Preserve Gasbuggy Site General Atomics Geothermal Gnome-Coach Site Grand Junction Sites Granite City Site Green River Site Gunnison...

74

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oxford OH Site - OH 22  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Site Fairfield Site Falls City Site Fernald Preserve Gasbuggy Site General Atomics Geothermal Gnome-Coach Site Grand Junction Sites Granite City Site Green River Site Gunnison...

75

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maywood Site - NJ 10  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Site Fairfield Site Falls City Site Fernald Preserve Gasbuggy Site General Atomics Geothermal Gnome-Coach Site Grand Junction Sites Granite City Site Green River Site Gunnison...

76

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Seymour CT Site - CT 02  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Site Fairfield Site Falls City Site Fernald Preserve Gasbuggy Site General Atomics Geothermal Gnome-Coach Site Grand Junction Sites Granite City Site Green River Site Gunnison...

77

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Niagara Falls Storage Site...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Site Fairfield Site Falls City Site Fernald Preserve Gasbuggy Site General Atomics Geothermal Gnome-Coach Site Grand Junction Sites Granite City Site Green River Site Gunnison...

78

DOE Statement on Savannah River Site Vitrified Waste Concentrations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement on Savannah River Site Vitrified Waste Concentrations Statement on Savannah River Site Vitrified Waste Concentrations DOE Statement on Savannah River Site Vitrified Waste Concentrations April 30, 2010 - 12:30pm Addthis "The Office of Environmental Management has decided not to move forward at this time with its February decision to direct contractors to start planning for higher concentrations of plutonium in waste canisters at the Savannah River Site. While this may ultimately be a better way to manage and minimize the volume of waste, the Department wants to further review the issues involved before proceeding. No canisters have been filled at the higher concentration level." Addthis Related Articles Energy Secretary Chu Announces $6 Billion in Recovery Act Funding for Environmental Cleanup Department of Energy Projects Win 36 R&D 100 Awards for 2011

79

DOE Idaho site reaches 20-year cleanup milestone  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, 83403 IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, 83403 Media Contact: Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 For Immediate Release: January 19, 2012 DOE Idaho site reaches 20-year cleanup milestone IDAHO FALLS, ID- In two decades of Superfund cleanup work, the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho site has removed hundreds of thousands of cubic yards of radioactive and hazardously contaminated soils, excavated radioactive waste buried since the 1950s, removed three nuclear reactors and hundreds of buildings, completely closed three major nuclear facilities and removed thousands of unexploded ordnance shells and fragments. Last month marked the 20-year anniversary of the signing and implementation of a cleanup agreement between DOE, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the state of Idaho. In two decades, the cleanup agreement known

80

Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December December 2000 A Report to the Secretary of Energy Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites OVERSIGHT Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................... 5 2.0 Summary of Review Results .............................................................. 8 2.1 Wildland Fire Management Policy ............................................. 8 2.2 Fire/Emergency Hazards Assessments ....................................... 9 2.3 Wildland Fire Prevention and Response .................................. 11 2.4 Offsite Interfaces and Agreements ........................................... 13 2.5 Feedback and Continuous Improvement

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Updated Site Response Analyses for the Waste Treatment Plant, DOE Hanford, Site, Washington.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document describes the calculations performed to develop updated relative amplification functions for the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) facility at the DOE Hanford Site, Washington State. The original 2,000-year return period design spectra for the WTP were based on the results of a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) performed for the DOE Hanford Site by Geomatrix (1996). Geomatrix (1996) performed the PSHA using empirical soil-site ground motion models based primarily on recordings from California. As part of that study, site response analyses were performed to evaluate ground motions at the Hanford sites and California deep soil sites. As described in Appendix A of Geomatrix (1996), characteristic site profiles and dynamic soil properties representative of conditions at various Hanford sites and California deep soil strong motion recording stations were defined. Relative site responses of the Hanford profiles and California profiles were then compared. Based on the results of those site response analyses, it was concluded that ground motions at the Hanford sites underlain by deep soil deposits are similar in character to those on California deep soil sites and it was judged appropriate to use empirical deep soil site attenuation relationships based primarily on California ground motion data to develop design spectra for the Hanford sites. In a subsequent analysis, Geomatrix (2003) updated the site response analyses of Geomatrix (1996, Appendix A) to incorporate randomization of the California and Hanford profiles. The results of that analysis also led to the conclusion that the response of the Hanford profiles was similar to the response of deep soil sites in California.

Youngs, Robert R.

2007-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

82

DOE site facility mgt contracts Internet Posting 5-2-11.xlsx...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

site facility mgt contracts Internet Posting 5-2-11.xlsx DOE site facility mgt contracts Internet Posting 5-2-11.xlsx DOE site facility mgt contracts Internet Posting 5-2-11.xlsx...

83

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Tatum Salt Dome Test Site...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Tatum Salt Dome Test Site - MS 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Tatum Salt Dome Test Site (MS.01) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site...

84

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Exxon Ray Point Site - 032  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Exxon Ray Point Site - 032 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Exxon Ray Point Site (032) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition:...

85

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- LM Sites Map  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LM Sites Map LM Sites Map LM Sites LM Sites Puerto Rico Connecticut New Jersey Massachusetts Alaska Texas Florida Arizona Missouri Colorado Utah Idaho Washington South Dakota New Mexico California Oregon Tennessee Illinois Ohio Michigan New York Pennsylvania Wyoming Nebraska West Virginia Kentucky Mississippi Nevada Select a Site Acid/Pueblo Canyon Site Adrian Site Albany Site Aliquippa Site Ambrosia Lake Disposal Site Amchitka Site Ashtabula Site Bayo Canyon Site Berkeley Site Beverly Site Bluewater Disposal Site BONUS Decommissioned Reactor Buffalo Site Burrell Disposal Site CEER Sites Canonsburg Disposal Site Central Nevada Test Area Site Chariot Site Chicago North Site Chicago South Site Chupadera Mesa Site Colonie Site Columbus Sites Columbus East Site Durango Disposal Site Durango Processing Site

86

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- LM Sites Map  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

LM Sites Map LM Sites Map LM Sites LM Sites Puerto Rico Connecticut New Jersey Massachusetts Alaska Texas Florida Arizona Missouri Colorado Utah Idaho Washington South Dakota New Mexico California Oregon Tennessee Illinois Ohio Michigan New York Pennsylvania Wyoming Nebraska West Virginia Kentucky Mississippi Nevada Select a Site Acid/Pueblo Canyon Site Adrian Site Albany Site Aliquippa Site Ambrosia Lake Disposal Site Amchitka Site Ashtabula Site Bayo Canyon Site Berkeley Site Beverly Site Bluewater Disposal Site BONUS Decommissioned Reactor Buffalo Site Burrell Disposal Site CEER Sites Canonsburg Disposal Site Central Nevada Test Area Site Chariot Site Chicago North Site Chicago South Site Chupadera Mesa Site Colonie Site Columbus Sites Columbus East Site Durango Disposal Site Durango Processing Site

87

EA-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the Final Site-Wide Environment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

87: DOE Notice of Availability of the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EA-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Y-12...

88

EIS-0426: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmen...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Public Hearings EIS-0426: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide...

89

EIS-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmen...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Y-12...

90

The Evolution of LTS at DOE's Hanford Site - 14189  

SciTech Connect

Hanford?s Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) Program has evolved from a small, informal process, with minimal support, to a robust program that provides comprehensive transitions from cleanup contractors to long-term stewardship for post-cleanup requirements specified in the associated cleanup decision documents. The LTS Program has the responsibility for almost 100,000 acres of land, along with over 200 waste sites and will soon have six cocooned reactors. Close to 2,600 documents have been identified and tagged for storage in the LTS document library. The program has successfully completed six consecutive transitions over the last two years in support of the U.S. DOE Richland Operations Office?s (DOE-RL) near-term cleanup objectives of significantly reducing the footprint of active cleanup operations for the River Corridor. The program has evolved from one that was initially responsible for defining and measuring Institutional Controls for the Hanford Site, to a comprehensive, post remediation surveillance and maintenance program that begins early in the transition process. In 2013, the first reactor area―the cocooned 105-F Reactor and its surrounding 1,100 acres, called the F Area was transitioned. In another ?first,? the program is expected to transition the five remaining cocooned reactors into the program through using a Transition and Turnover Package (TTP). As Hanford?s LTS Program moves into the next few years, it will continue to build on a collaborative approach. The program has built strong relationships between contractors, regulators, tribes and stakeholders and with the U.S. Department of Energy?s Office of Legacy Management (LM). The LTS Program has been working with LM since its inception. The transition process utilized LM?s Site Transition Framework as one of the initial requirement documents and the Hanford Program continues to collaborate with LM today. One example of this collaboration is the development of the LTS Program?s records management system in which, LM has been instrumental. The development of a rigorous data collection and records management systems has been influenced and built off of LMs success, which also ensures compatibility between what Hanford?s LTS Program develops and LM. In another example, we are exploring a pilot project to ship records from the Hanford Site directly to LM for long-term storage. This pilot would gain program efficiencies so that records would be handled only once. Rather than storage on-site, then shipment to an interim Federal Records Center in Seattle, records would be shipped directly to LM. The Hanford LTS Program is working to best align programmatic processes, find efficiencies, and to benchmark site transition requirements. Involving the Hanford LTS Program early in the transition process with an integrated contractor and DOE team is helping to ensure that there is time to work through details on the completed remediation of transitioning areas. It also will allow for record documentation and storage for the future, and is an opportunity for the program to mature through the experiences that will be gained by implementing LTS Program activities over time.

Moren, Richard J.; Grindstaff, Keith D.

2013-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

91

The Evolution of LTS at DOE's Hanford Site - 14189  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Hanford?s Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) Program has evolved from a small, informal process, with minimal support, to a robust program that provides comprehensive transitions from cleanup contractors to long-term stewardship for post-cleanup requirements specified in the associated cleanup decision documents. The LTS Program has the responsibility for almost 100,000 acres of land, along with over 200 waste sites and will soon have six cocooned reactors. Close to 2,600 documents have been identified and tagged for storage in the LTS document library. The program has successfully completed six consecutive transitions over the last two years in support of the U.S. DOE Richland Operations Office?s (DOE-RL) near-term cleanup objectives of significantly reducing the footprint of active cleanup operations for the River Corridor. The program has evolved from one that was initially responsible for defining and measuring Institutional Controls for the Hanford Site, to a comprehensive, post remediation surveillance and maintenance program that begins early in the transition process. In 2013, the first reactor area?the cocooned 105-F Reactor and its surrounding 1,100 acres, called the F Area was transitioned. In another ?first,? the program is expected to transition the five remaining cocooned reactors into the program through using a Transition and Turnover Package (TTP). As Hanford?s LTS Program moves into the next few years, it will continue to build on a collaborative approach. The program has built strong relationships between contractors, regulators, tribes and stakeholders and with the U.S. Department of Energy?s Office of Legacy Management (LM). The LTS Program has been working with LM since its inception. The transition process utilized LM?s Site Transition Framework as one of the initial requirement documents and the Hanford Program continues to collaborate with LM today. One example of this collaboration is the development of the LTS Program?s records management system in which, LM has been instrumental. The development of a rigorous data collection and records management systems has been influenced and built off of LMs success, which also ensures compatibility between what Hanford?s LTS Program develops and LM. In another example, we are exploring a pilot project to ship records from the Hanford Site directly to LM for long-term storage. This pilot would gain program efficiencies so that records would be handled only once. Rather than storage on-site, then shipment to an interim Federal Records Center in Seattle, records would be shipped directly to LM. The Hanford LTS Program is working to best align programmatic processes, find efficiencies, and to benchmark site transition requirements. Involving the Hanford LTS Program early in the transition process with an integrated contractor and DOE team is helping to ensure that there is time to work through details on the completed remediation of transitioning areas. It also will allow for record documentation and storage for the future, and is an opportunity for the program to mature through the experiences that will be gained by implementing LTS Program activities over time.

Moren, Richard J.; Grindstaff, Keith D.

2013-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

92

Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 December 2000 Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites The initial joint review was conducted between October 15 and December 15, 2000, by the Offices of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), Security and Emergency Operations (SO), and Environment, Safety and Health (EH). The purpose of the initial joint review was to assess the abilities of DOE sites to prevent and respond to wildland fires and provide recommendations for pertinent site-specific and DOE-wide improvements. Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0760

93

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Monticello Mill Site - UT 03  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mill Site - UT 03 Mill Site - UT 03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Monticello Mill Site (UT.03) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Monticello, Utah, Disposal and Processing Sites Documents Related to Monticello Mill Site Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III Interim Remedial Action Progress Report July 1999-July 2000. GJO-2000-163-TAR. September 2000 U.S. Department of Energy at Grand Junction 2003 Annual Inspection Monticello, Utah November 2003 2005 Annual Inspection of the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) and Monticello Radioactively Contaminated Properties Sites December 2005 Office

94

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lowman Mill Site - ID 01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Lowman, Idaho, Disposal Site Documents Related to Lowman Mill Site Historical documents may contain...

95

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mexican Hat Mill Site -...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Act Title I Disposal Sites-Mexican Hat, Utah, Disposal Site. LMSS09461. February 2013 Historic Fact Sheet: Mexican Hat Disposal Site Uranium ore was processed near Mexican...

96

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Falls City Mill Site - TX...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site Documents Related to Falls City Mill Site Data Validation Package for...

97

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- South Valley Superfund Site...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Department...

98

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- New Canaan Site - CT 08  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Year: 1985 CT.08-2 Site Operations: None; Investigation of area prompted by public query; no site found in New Canaan. CT.08-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No AEC site...

99

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Conoco Conquista Site -...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

This site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Title II site located in Texas. UMTRA Title II sites are privately owned and operated sites that were active when the...

100

DOE Issues Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Issues Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the DOE Issues Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada National Security Site DOE Issues Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada National Security Site February 22, 2013 - 2:38pm Addthis DOE Issues Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada National Security Site The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has issued the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and Off-Site Locations in Nevada. This document presents an analysis of the potential environmental impacts of continued management and operation of the NNSS (formerly known as the Nevada Test Site), the Tonopah Test Range, and two locations in Las

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Edgemont Mill Site - SD 01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Edgemont Mill Site - SD 01 Edgemont Mill Site - SD 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Edgemont Mill Site (SD.01) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site Documents Related to Edgemont Mill Site 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites-Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site. LMS/S09415. November 2012 U.S. Department of Energy 2008 UMTRCA Title II Sites Annual Report November 2008 Edgemont, South Dakota FACT SHEET Office of Legacy Management Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site This fact sheet provides information about the Uranium Mill

102

EA-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the Final Site-Wide Environmental  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

87: DOE Notice of Availability of the Final Site-Wide 87: DOE Notice of Availability of the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EA-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, TN The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-autonomous agency within the Department of Energy (DOE), announces the availability of the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex (Final Y-12 SWEIS, DOE/EIS-0387). National Nuclear Security Administration Notice of Availability of the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex, DOE/EA-0387 (March 2011) 76 FR 12103 More Documents & Publications EIS-0387: Record of Decision EIS-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental

103

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Uravan Mill Site - CO 02  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Uravan Mill Site - CO 02 Uravan Mill Site - CO 02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Uravan Mill Site (CO.02 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Naturita, Colorado, Processing Site Documents Related to Uravan Mill Site Data Validation Package for the July and October 2008 Water Sampling at the Naturita Processing and Disposal Sites Data Validation Report for the July 2009 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Naturita, Colorado, Processing Site; LMS/NAP/S00709; October 2009 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Naturita, Colorado,

104

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Pathfinder Lucky Mc Site - 042  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Pathfinder Lucky Mc Site - 042 Pathfinder Lucky Mc Site - 042 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Pathfinder Lucky Mc Site (042) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Pathfinder Lucky Mc site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Title II site located in the Gas Hills Uranium Mining District west of Casper, Wyoming. UMTRA Title II sites are privately owned and operated sites that were active when the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act was passed in 1978. The majority of the milling conducted at these sites was for private sale, but a portion was sold to the U.S. Government. After the owner completes U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission license termination,

105

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- WNI Sherwood Site - 039  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sherwood Site - 039 Sherwood Site - 039 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: WNI Sherwood Site (039) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Title II site located in the State of Washington. UMTRA Title II sites are privately owned and operated sites that were active when the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act was passed in 1978. The majority milling conducted at this site was for private sale. After the owner completes NRC license termination the Department of Energy¿s Grand Junction Office will be responsible for providing stewardship for the groundwater and disposal

106

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Chevron Panna Maria Site - 030  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Chevron Panna Maria Site - 030 Chevron Panna Maria Site - 030 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Chevron Panna Maria Site (030) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Title II site located in Texas. UMTRA Title II sites are privately owned and operated sites that were active when the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act was passed in 1978. The milling conducted at this site was for private sale. After the owner completes U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission license termination the Department of Energy¿s Grand Junction Office will be responsible for providing stewardship for the groundwater and disposal

107

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- WNI Split Rock Site - 043  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Split Rock Site - 043 Split Rock Site - 043 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: WNI Split Rock Site (043) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Western Nuclear, Inc. (WNI) Split Rock site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Title II site located in Jeffrey City, Wyoming. UMTRA Title II sites are privately owned and operated sites that were active when the Uranium Mill Tailings Control Act was passed in 1978. The majority of the milling conducted at these sites was for private sale, but a portion was sold to the U.S. Government. After the owner completes U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission license termination, the Department of

108

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ANC Gas Hills Site - 040  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ANC Gas Hills Site - 040 ANC Gas Hills Site - 040 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: ANC Gas Hills Site (040) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The ANC Gas Hills site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Title II site located in Gas Hills, Wyoming. UMTRA Title II sites are privately owned and operated sites that were active when the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act was passed in 1978. The majority of the milling conducted at these sites was for private sale, but a portion was sold to the U.S. Government. After the owner completes U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission license termination, the Department of Energy¿s

109

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hecla Durita Site - 012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hecla Durita Site - 012 Hecla Durita Site - 012 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Hecla Durita Site (012 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Hecla site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title II site located in Durita, Colorado. UMTRCA Title II sites are privately owned and operated sites that were active when the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act was passed in 1978. The majority of milling conducted at this site was for private sale. After the owner completes U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission license termination, the Department of Energy's Grand Junction Office will be responsible for providing

110

EIS-0426: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Public Hearings EIS-0426: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Public Hearings Continued Operation of the Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a separately organized semi-autonomous agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), announces the availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada (Draft SWEIS, DOE/EIS-0426D) for public review, as well as the locations, dates and

111

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nevada Test Site - 023  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Nevada Test Site - 023 Nevada Test Site - 023 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Nevada Test Site (023) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Nevada Test Site was established by the Atomic Energy Commission in the 1950's to conduct field testing of nuclear explosives in connection with the research and development of nuclear weapons. The environmental management activities for this site are under the purview of the Department of Energy¿s Nevada Operations Office. The National Nuclear Security Administration is the site landlord and will be responsible for Long Term Stewardship. Also see Documents Related to Nevada Test Site

112

Two Years Later: Bill Picciano of DOE's Savannah River Site ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site (SRS) - a job funded by the Recovery Act to accelerate the cleanup of the former nuclear weapons research site and make the site safe for future generations. Like too many...

113

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Project Gnome Site - NM...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Gnome-Coach, New Mexico, Site Documents Related to Project Gnome Site Fact Sheet Gnome-Coach: The Gnome-Coach...

114

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Pennsylvania Disposal Site...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

documentation of the period do not provide sufficient information to warrant further search of historical records for information on these sites. These site files remain "open"...

115

DOI Designates B Reactor at DOE's Hanford Site as a National Historic  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOI Designates B Reactor at DOE's Hanford Site as a National DOI Designates B Reactor at DOE's Hanford Site as a National Historic Landmark DOI Designates B Reactor at DOE's Hanford Site as a National Historic Landmark August 25, 2008 - 3:20pm Addthis DOE to offer regular public tours in 2009 WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Deputy Secretary Lynn Scarlett and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Acting Deputy Secretary Jeffrey F. Kupfer today announced the designation of DOE's B Reactor as a National Historic Landmark and unveiled DOE's plan for a new public access program to enable American citizens to visit B Reactor during the 2009 tourist season. The B Reactor at DOE's Hanford Site in southeast Washington State was the world's first industrial-scale nuclear reactor and produced plutonium for the atomic weapon that was dropped on Nagasaki,

116

DOE/EIS-0238, Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EIS-0238, Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for DOE/EIS-0238, Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (1999) DOE/EIS-0238, Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (1999) DOE proposes to continue operating the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) located in Los Alamos County, in north-central New Mexico. DOE has identified and assessed four alternatives for the operation of LANL: (1) No Action, (2) Expanded Operations, (3) Reduced Operations, and (4) Greener. Expanded Operations is DOE's Preferred Alternative, with the exception that DOE would only implement pit manufacturing at a level of 20 pits per year. DOE/EIS-0238, Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (1999)

117

DOI Designates B Reactor at DOE's Hanford Site as a National Historic  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOI Designates B Reactor at DOE's Hanford Site as a National DOI Designates B Reactor at DOE's Hanford Site as a National Historic Landmark DOI Designates B Reactor at DOE's Hanford Site as a National Historic Landmark August 25, 2008 - 3:20pm Addthis DOE to offer regular public tours in 2009 WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Deputy Secretary Lynn Scarlett and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Acting Deputy Secretary Jeffrey F. Kupfer today announced the designation of DOE's B Reactor as a National Historic Landmark and unveiled DOE's plan for a new public access program to enable American citizens to visit B Reactor during the 2009 tourist season. The B Reactor at DOE's Hanford Site in southeast Washington State was the world's first industrial-scale nuclear reactor and produced plutonium for the atomic weapon that was dropped on Nagasaki,

118

Savannah River Site Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Site Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Savannah River Site Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Security Protection Officer Competition Savannah River Site Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Security Protection Officer Competition April 26, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor, (803) 952-8564, bill.taylor@srs.gov Savannah River Site, Aiken, S.C. - Security Protection Officers from Savannah River Site's (SRS) security contractor WSI-SRS, today won the Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary's Trophy as the top DOE team in the 2012 Security Protection Officer Team Competition (SPOTC)- 2012 Carolina Challenge, held here, April 22-26. It was the 40th anniversary of the SPOTC competition. In 2012 Carolina Challenge, SRS was among 11 teams representing DOE sites. The threeman team competition was won by Security Protection Officers

119

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Slick Rock Mill Site - CO 08  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Slick Rock Mill Site - CO 08 Slick Rock Mill Site - CO 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Slick Rock Mill Site (CO.08) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Slick Rock, Colorado, Processing Site Documents Related to Slick Rock Mill Site 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Slick Rock, Colorado, Disposal Site. LMS/S09461. February 2013 Verification Monitoring Report for the Slick Rock, Colorado, Processing Sites, 2007 Update June 2008 Office of Legacy Management DOE M/1577 2008 - -L Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. for the U.S.

120

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shoal Test Site - NV 03  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Shoal Test Site - NV 03 Shoal Test Site - NV 03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SHOAL TEST SITE (NV.03 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Sand Springs Range NV.03-1 Location: Near U.S. Highway 50 , Fallon , Nevada NV.03-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 NV.03-2 Site Operations: Underground nuclear detonation site. NV.03-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NV.03-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None at the Surface and Fission Fragments Within the Subsurface NV.03-1 Radiological Survey(s): Yes Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to SHOAL TEST SITE NV.03-1 - Report (NVO-1229-105 Part I); Evaluation of the Project

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- SiteA  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Illinois Illinois Site A/Plot M Decommissioned Reactor Site This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2013 Inspection and Annual Site Status Report for the Site A/Plot M, Cook County, Illinois Decontamination and Decommissioning Program Site Annual Monitoring Report Environmental Monitoring Program at Site A and Plot M, Palos Forest Preserve, Cook County, Illinois Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan for Site A/Plot M, Illinois,Decommissioned Reactor Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Request a paper copy of any document by submitting a Document Request. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon

122

EAC Recommendations for DOE Action Regarding the CSG Interstate Transmission Siting Compact- June 6, 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

EAC Recommendations for DOE Action Regarding the CSG Interstate Transmission Siting Compact, approved at the June 5-6, 2013 EAC Meeting.

123

Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

strengthen the Department's capabilities in preventing and responding to wildland fires. DOE orders and policy guidance do not clearly establish or convey expectations for...

124

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Marion Mill Site - CO 09  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Marion Mill Site - CO 09 Marion Mill Site - CO 09 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MARION MILL SITE (CO.09 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - deferred to the State of Colorado for appropriate action. Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Sugar Leaf Road , Boulder , Colorado CO.09-1 Evaluation Year: Circa 1983 CO.09-1 Site Operations: Milled and processed thorite and other rare earth ores in 1957 and 1958. Some of the thorium concentrate produced was shipped to Davison Chemical Company for further processing. CO.09-1 CO.09-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Site was licensed by AEC and the State of Colorado CO.09-2 CO.09-3 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Thorium, Natural Uranium, Other Rare Earth Ores CO.09-1

125

DOE Issues Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and operation of the NNSS (formerly known as the Nevada Test Site), the Tonopah Test Range, and two locations in Las Vegas, Nevada. The Site-Wide EIS analyzes reasonably...

126

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maybell Mill Site - CO 0...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Act Title I Disposal Sites-Maybell, Colorado, Disposal Site. LMSS09461. February 2013 U.S. Department of Energy 2008 UMTRCA Title I Annual Report January 2009 Maybell,...

127

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Beverly MA Site - MA 04  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Beverly MA Site - MA 04 Beverly MA Site - MA 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Beverly, MA Alternate Name(s): Metal Hydrides, Inc. Ventron Corporation MA.04-1 Location: Congress Street, Beverly, Massachusetts MA.04-4 Historical Operations: Provided uranium metal production under contract with MED. Thorium and radium contamination occurred from non-MED operations. MA.04-6 Eligibility Determination: Eligible MA.04-1 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Survey, Verification Survey MA.04-4 MA.04-7 Site Status: Certified- Certification Basis, Federal Register Notice included MA.04-5 MA.04-6 MA.04-7 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP Also see Beverly, MA, Site Documents Related to Beverly, MA Beverly Site Aerial Photograph

128

NETL: News Release - DOE "Best Practices" Manual Focuses on Site...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the latest in a series of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CCS "best practices" manuals. MORE INFO Read the Manual Developed by the Office of Fossil Energy's (FE) National...

129

DOE Permitting Hydrogen Facilities: Animation of a Telecommunications Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Animation of a Telecommunications Site Example Layout Animation of a Telecommunications Site Example Layout The animation below provides an example of a telecommunications site layout that uses hydrogen fuel cells for backup power along with some of the codes and standards that apply to such a site. Roll over each of the colored bars below to reveal individual setback requirements, which identify the mandatory separation distances of the site's various components, or select the "Go to Setback Details" button for a chart that summarizes these requirements as defined by the 2006 International Fire Code. Select the "Construction Approval" button for a detailed list of codes and standards related to the construction of a site, or select the "Operation Approval" button for codes and standards related to ongoing operation and

130

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Berkeley CA Site - CA 03  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Berkeley CA Site - CA 03 Berkeley CA Site - CA 03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Berkeley, CA Alternate Name(s): University of California Gilman Hall, University of California CA.03-1 Location: Gilman Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California CA.03-1 Historical Operations: Performed research and development on the synthesis and production of plutonium, resulting in uranium, plutonium, cesium and americium contamination. CA.03-3 CA.03-5 Eligibility Determination: Eligible CA.03-1 CA.03-2 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys CA.03-3 CA.03-4 Site Status: Certified- Certification Basis and Certification Statement CA.03-5 CA.03-6 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP Also see Berkeley, CA, Site

131

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maywood Site - NJ 10  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Maywood Site - NJ 10 Maywood Site - NJ 10 FUSRAP Considered Sites Maywood, NJ Alternate Name(s): Maywood Chemical Works Maywood Chemical Company Maywood Interim Storage Site (MISS) Stepan Chemical Company NJ.10-2 NJ.10-3 NJ.10-7 NJ.10-11 Location: 100 West Hunter Avenue, Maywood/Rochelle Park, New Jersey NJ.10-4 Historical Operations: Processed monazite sands for extraction of rare earth compounds and mantle-grade thorium nitrates. NJ.10-2 NJ.10-3 NJ.10-4 NJ.10-5 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NJ.10-1 NJ.10-10 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys NJ.10-6 NJ.10-7 NJ.10-8 Site Status: Cleanup in progress by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. NJ.10-9 NJ.10-13 USACE FUSRAP Long-term Care Requirements: To be determined upon completion. Also see FUSRAP Maywood Superfund Site

132

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hamilton OH Site - OH 27  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Hamilton OH Site - OH 27 Hamilton OH Site - OH 27 FUSRAP Considered Sites Hamilton, OH Alternate Name(s): Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company Diebold Incorporated OH.27-2 Location: 1550 Grand Boulevard, Hamilton, Ohio OH.27-2 Historical Operations: Machined uranium metal slugs from rolled stock, under subcontract with National Lead, an MED contractor. OH.27-3 OH.27-4 OH.27-9 Eligibility Determination: Eligible OH.27-1 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys, Verification Survey OH.27-1 OH.27-5 OH.27-6 OH.27-7 Site Status: Certified - Certification Basis, Federal Register Notice included OH.27-8 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP Also see Hamilton, OH Site Documents Related to Hamilton, OH

133

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shiprock Mill Site - NM...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

to the Refinement of Conceptual Model and Recommendations for Improving Remediation Efficiency at the Shiprock, New Mexico Site, July 2005. NEPA Environmental Checklist for...

134

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- St Louis Airport Site Vicinity...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Corps of Engineers (Corps) in accordance with the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act for FY 1998. Also see Documents Related to St. Louis Airport Site Vicinity...

135

DOE's Rocky Flats Cleanup Site Named 2006 Project of the Year By Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE's Rocky Flats Cleanup Site Named 2006 Project of the Year By DOE's Rocky Flats Cleanup Site Named 2006 Project of the Year By Project Management Institute DOE's Rocky Flats Cleanup Site Named 2006 Project of the Year By Project Management Institute October 23, 2006 - 9:17am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that the Project Management Institute (PMI) has awarded its 2006 Project of the Year to DOE's Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site. The award was presented to DOE contractor Kaiser-Hill, LLC during the PMI Global Congress Dinner 2006 on Saturday, October 21st, 2006 in Seattle, Washington. "It is a great honor for the Department of Energy's Rocky Flats safe cleanup and closure effort to be recognized with this prestigious award," James Rispoli, Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental

136

Savannah River Site Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Security Protection Officer Competition Savannah River Site Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Security Protection Officer Competition April 26, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor, (803) 952-8564, bill.taylor@srs.gov Savannah River Site, Aiken, S.C. - Security Protection Officers from Savannah River Site's (SRS) security contractor WSI-SRS, today won the Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary's Trophy as the top DOE team in the 2012 Security Protection Officer Team Competition (SPOTC)- 2012 Carolina Challenge, held here, April 22-26. It was the 40th anniversary of the SPOTC competition. In 2012 Carolina Challenge, SRS was among 11 teams representing DOE sites. The threeman team competition was won by Security Protection Officers

137

DOE's Rocky Flats Cleanup Site Named 2006 Project of the Year By Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE's Rocky Flats Cleanup Site Named 2006 Project of the Year By DOE's Rocky Flats Cleanup Site Named 2006 Project of the Year By Project Management Institute DOE's Rocky Flats Cleanup Site Named 2006 Project of the Year By Project Management Institute October 23, 2006 - 9:17am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that the Project Management Institute (PMI) has awarded its 2006 Project of the Year to DOE's Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site. The award was presented to DOE contractor Kaiser-Hill, LLC during the PMI Global Congress Dinner 2006 on Saturday, October 21st, 2006 in Seattle, Washington. "It is a great honor for the Department of Energy's Rocky Flats safe cleanup and closure effort to be recognized with this prestigious award," James Rispoli, Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental

138

EIS-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, TN The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a separately-organized agency within the Department of Energy (DOE), announces the availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex (Draft Y-12 SWEIS, DOE/EIS-0387) (74 FR 56189) (October 2009) National Nuclear Security Administration Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex, EIS-0387(October 2009) More Documents & Publications EIS-0387: Record of Decision

139

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Wayne Site - NJ 16  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Wayne Site - NJ 16 Wayne Site - NJ 16 FUSRAP Considered Sites Wayne, NJ Alternate Name(s): Wayne Interim Storage Site (WISS) W.R. Grace and Company W.R. Grace Site Rare Earths, Inc. Davison Chemical Division NJ.16-1 NJ.16-2 NJ.16-3 Location: 868 Black Oak Road, Wayne, New Jersey NJ.16-5 Historical Operations: Produced crude thorium hydroxide and rare earth elements from monazite sands. Site was also used for interim storage of contaminated material removed from vicinity properties under FUSRAP. NJ.16-5 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NJ.16-1 NJ.16-11 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys NJ.16-3 NJ.16-6 NJ.16-7 NJ.16-8 NJ.16-9 Site Status: USACE cleanup complete, not yet delisted from the National Priorities List. USACE Website EPA Website Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP

140

Two Years Later: Bill Picciano of DOE's Savannah River Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

We checked back in with Bill Picciano, who we last spoke to in October 2009 after he'd recently been hired at the Savannah River Site (SRS) through the Recovery Act. Now he's permanently employed at the Site as an Associate Engineer/Technical Support Specialist - a job he's proud to have.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Buffalo NY Site - NY 54  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Buffalo NY Site - NY 54 Buffalo NY Site - NY 54 FUSRAP Considered Sites Buffalo, NY Alternate Name(s): Bliss & Laughlin Steel Company Niagara Cold Drawn Steel Corporation Ramco Steel Incorporated NY.54-1 NY.54-4 Location: 110 Hopkins Street, Buffalo, New York NY.54-1 Historical Operations: Machined and straightened uranium rods as subcontracted work from National Lead Company, an AEC contractor. NY.54-3 NY.54-4 LTSM012601 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NY.54-4 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys, Verification Surveys NY.54-6 NY.54-7 NY.54-8 LTSM012601 Site Status: Certified- Certification Basis and Certification Statement BLS000001 LTSM012152 LTSM012584 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP

142

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fairfield OH Site - OH 23  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fairfield OH Site - OH 23 Fairfield OH Site - OH 23 FUSRAP Considered Sites Fairfield, OH Alternate Name(s): Associate Aircraft Tool & Manufacturing, Inc. Associated Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Company Force Control Industries Former Dixie Machinery OH.23-1 OH.23-2 Location: 3660 Dixie Highway, Fairfield, Ohio OH.23-2 Historical Operations: Produced natural uranium hollow slugs, resulting in uranium metal contamination. OH.23-4 OH.23-5 Eligibility Determination: Eligible OH.23-1 OH.23-2 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Survey, Verification Survey OH.23-3 OH.23-6 Site Status: Certified - Certification Basis, Federal Register Notice included OH.23-7 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP

143

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Latty Avenue Site - MO 04  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Latty Avenue Site - MO 04 Latty Avenue Site - MO 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Latty Avenue Site, MO Alternate Name(s): Futura Coatings Futura Chemical Company Facility Hazelwood Interim Storage Site (HISS) Former Cotter Site, Latty Avenue Properties Contemporary Metals Corp. Continental Mining and Milling MO.04-1 MO.04-2 MO.04-5 MO.04-6 MO.06-8 MO.06-11 Location: 9200 Latty Avenue, Hazelwood, Missouri MO.04-1 Historical Operations: Received, stored, and processed uranium residues for the AEC. Storage and processing were licensed by the AEC and NRC and resulted in contamination of uranium and thorium. MO.04-5 MO.04-6 Eligibility Determination: Eligible MO.04-3 MO.04-4 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys MO.04-2 MO.04-7 MO.04-8 MO.04-9 MO.04-10 MO.04-11 Site Status: Cleanup in progress by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. MO.04-12

144

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Belfield Mill Site - ND...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Site Historical documents may contain links which are no longer valid or to outside sources. LM can not attest to the accuracy of information provided by these links. Please see...

145

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bowman Mill Site - ND 0...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Site Historical documents may contain links which are no longer valid or to outside sources. LM can not attest to the accuracy of information provided by these links. Please see...

146

Microsoft Word - DOE's Idaho site safety QA.docx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

11, 2011 Japanese earthquake and tsunami as applied to the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho site 1. What level of earthquake hazard would the Idaho National Laboratory (INL)...

147

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- St Louis Downtown Site ...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

to LaGrone; Authorization for Remedial Action at the Seaway Industrial Park and Ashland Oil Co. (I) Sites at Tonawanda, NY and Mallinckrodt Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.; June 22,...

148

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Kennecott Sweetwater Site...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act was passed in 1978. The majority of the milling conducted at these sites was for private sale, but a portion was sold to the U.S....

149

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Dawn Ford Site - 038  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

when the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act was passed in 1978. The majority milling at these sites was for private sale, but a portion was sold to the U. S. Government....

150

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- EFB White Mesa Site - 033  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

active when the Uranium Mill tailings Radiation Control Act was passed in 1978. The milling conducted at this site was for private sale. After the owner completes U. S. Nuclear...

151

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Cotter Canon City Site ...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act was passed in 1978. The majority of the milling conducted at these sites was for private sale, but a portion was sold to the U. S....

152

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sohio Lbar Site - 022  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

active when the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act was passed in 1978. The milling conducted at this site was for private sale. After the owner completes U. S. Nuclear...

153

Framework for DOE mixed low-level waste disposal: Site fact sheets  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) is required to prepare and submit Site Treatment Plans (STPS) pursuant to the Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFCAct). Although the FFCAct does not require that disposal be addressed in the STPS, the DOE and the States recognize that treatment of mixed low-level waste will result in residues that will require disposal in either low-level waste or mixed low-level waste disposal facilities. As a result, the DOE is working with the States to define and develop a process for evaluating disposal-site suitability in concert with the FFCAct and development of the STPS. Forty-nine potential disposal sites were screened; preliminary screening criteria reduced the number of sites for consideration to twenty-six. The DOE then prepared fact sheets for the remaining sites. These fact sheets provided additional site-specific information for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the twenty-six sites as potential disposal sites. The information also provided the basis for discussion among affected States and the DOE in recommending sites for more detailed evaluation.

Gruebel, M.M.; Waters, R.D.; Hospelhorn, M.B.; Chu, M.S.Y. [eds.

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

154

Site Map | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Site Map Site Map Site Map Contact Information Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5430 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page SC Home Programs Advanced Scientific Computing Research Basic Energy Sciences Biological and Environmental Research Fusion Energy Sciences High Energy Physics Nuclear Physics Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer Project Assessment Laboratories Labs at-a-Glance: Ames Laboratory Labs at-a-Glance: Argonne National Laboratory Labs at-a-Glance: Brookhaven National Laboratory Labs at-a-Glance: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Labs at-a-Glance: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Labs at-a-Glance: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

155

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Riverton Mill Site - WY 0-04  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Mill Site - WY 0-04 Mill Site - WY 0-04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Riverton Mill Site (WY.0-04 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site Documents Related to Riverton Mill Site Data Validation Package for the November 2008 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site. February 2009 U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Status and Planned Actions at the Riverton, Wyoming, Uranium Mill Tailing Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I Site April Gil, PhD Environment Team Lead Office of Legacy Management (LM) May 2, 20122 Status and Action Summary 􀂄 Surface

156

DOE Programs and Major Site/Facility Contractors | Scientific and Technical  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Programs and Major Site/Facility Contractors DOE Programs and Major Site/Facility Contractors Print page Print page Email page Email page DOE Programs and Major Site/Facility Contractors have the option to provide metadata via the Announcement Notice 241.1 web notice, Batch Upload, or Harvesting. The metadata-based announcement notice generated and supplied by DOE and contractors for unclassified STI products includes the basic Dublin Core metadata elements, supplemented by a few DOE data elements, and a minimal number of subelements necessary to further identify the announcement/availability of the STI product. Principal Investigators and Authors A Principal Investigator is designated by a research organization to have an appropriate level of authority and responsibility for the proper conduct of the research, the use of funds, and administrative requirements,

157

Chief Medical Officer Web Site Services Available To All DOE Employees |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chief Medical Officer Web Site Services Available To All DOE Chief Medical Officer Web Site Services Available To All DOE Employees Chief Medical Officer Web Site Services Available To All DOE Employees August 15, 2013 - 3:34pm Addthis Chief Medical Officer Web Site Services Available To All DOE Employees Did you ever wonder why you must undergo certain medical examinations every year if you work with hazardous materials or serve in a security function? Have you ever experienced stress, been worried about a family member's health, or wondered who to talk with about a health concern? The Department's Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Dr. Michael Ardaiz, wants you to know that the Occupational Medicine Program, part of the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), has developed a number of web pages to help you find information necessary to maintain and improve your health,

158

Chief Medical Officer Web Site Services Available To All DOE Employees |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chief Medical Officer Web Site Services Available To All DOE Chief Medical Officer Web Site Services Available To All DOE Employees Chief Medical Officer Web Site Services Available To All DOE Employees August 15, 2013 - 3:34pm Addthis Chief Medical Officer Web Site Services Available To All DOE Employees Did you ever wonder why you must undergo certain medical examinations every year if you work with hazardous materials or serve in a security function? Have you ever experienced stress, been worried about a family member's health, or wondered who to talk with about a health concern? The Department's Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Dr. Michael Ardaiz, wants you to know that the Occupational Medicine Program, part of the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), has developed a number of web pages to help you find information necessary to maintain and improve your health,

159

EMP Attachment 3 DOE-SC PNNL Site Dose Assessment Guidance  

SciTech Connect

This Dose Assessment Guidance (DAG) describes methods to use to determine the Maximally-Exposed Individual (MEI) location and to estimate dose impact to that individual under the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Site Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP). This guidance applies to public dose from radioactive material releases to the air from PNNL Site operations. This document is an attachment to the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) and describes dose assessment guidance for radiological air emissions. The impact of radiological air emissions from the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC) PNNL Site is indicated by dose estimates to a maximally exposed member of the public, referred to as the maximally exposed individual (MEI). Reporting requirements associated with dose to members of the public from radiological air emissions are in 40 CFR Part 61.94, WAC 246-247-080, and DOE Order 458.1. The DOE Order and state standards for dose from radioactive air emissions are consistent with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) dose standards in 40 CFR 61.92 (i.e., 10 mrem/yr to a MEI). Despite the fact that the current Contract Requirements Document (CRD) for the DOE-SC PNNL Site operations does not include the requirement to meet DOE CRD 458.1, paragraph 2.b, public dose limits, the DOE dose limits would be met when EPA limits are met.

Snyder, Sandra F.

2011-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

160

DOE Issues Request for Proposals for Hanford Site Occupational Medical Services  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

RICHLAND, Wash. The Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for an Occupational Medical Services contract at the Hanford Site. The solicitation is for a small-business contractor to perform occupational medical services for the DOE Richland Operations Office and Office of River Protection.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Benefits | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Benefits Benefits Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) SULI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Benefits Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Research interns spend 10 weeks (summer term) or 16 weeks (semester term) at a DOE laboratory engaged in a research project under the guidance of a laboratory scientist or engineer. Host laboratories provide enrichment activities, including career professional development workshops (e.g. technical and scientific writing skills development, poster, or oral presentation activities, etc.), laboratory tours, scientific lectures and seminars. Host laboratories provide all required site specific training. Beginning with the 2013 Summer Term, selected students receive a

162

Department of Energy Office of Science Pacific Northwest Site Office Environmental Monitoring Plan for the DOE-SC PNNL Site  

SciTech Connect

The Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) manages the contract for operations at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Site in Richland, Washington. Radiological operations at the DOE-SC PNNL Site expanded in 2010 with the completion of facilities at the Physical Sciences Facility. As a result of the expanded radiological work at the site, the Washington State Department of Health (WDOH) has required that offsite environmental surveillance be conducted as part of the PNNL Site Radioactive Air Emissions License. The environmental monitoring and surveillance requirements of various orders, regulations, and guidance documents consider emission levels and subsequent risk of negative human and environmental impacts. This Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) describes air surveillance activities at the DOE-SC PNNL Site. The determination of offsite environmental surveillance needs evolved out of a Data Quality Objectives process (Barnett et al. 2010) and Implementation Plan (Snyder et al. 2010). The entire EMP is a compilation of several documents, which include the Main Document (this text), Attachment 1: Sampling and Analysis Plan, Attachment 2: Data Management Plan, and Attachment 3: Dose Assessment Guidance.

Snyder, Sandra F.; Meier, Kirsten M.; Barnett, J. M.; Bisping, Lynn E.; Poston, Ted M.; Rhoads, Kathleen

2011-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

163

Kansas State University (KSU), DOE EV Site Operator Program  

SciTech Connect

Kansas State University, with funding support from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the Department of Energy's Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Through participation in this program, Kansas State is demonstrating, testing, and evaluating electric or hybrid vehicle technology. This participation will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU proposes to purchase one (1) electric or hybrid van and four (4) electric cars during the first two years of this five-year program. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has initiated a procurement order to purchase two (2) Soleq 1992 Ford EVcort station wagons. The G-Van has been signed in order for the public to be aware that this is an electric drive vehicle. Financial participant's names have been stenciled on the back door of the van. This vehicle is available for short term loan to interested utilities and companies. When other vehicles are obtained, the G-Van will be maintained on K-State's campus.

Hague, J.R.

1992-11-17T23:59:59.000Z

164

Kansas State University (KSU), DOE EV Site Operator Program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Kansas State University, with funding support from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the Department of Energy's Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Through participation in this program, Kansas State is demonstrating, testing, and evaluating electric or hybrid vehicle technology. This participation will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU proposes to purchase one (1) electric or hybrid van and four (4) electric cars during the first two years of this five-year program. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has initiated a procurement order to purchase two (2) Soleq 1992 Ford EVcort station wagons. The G-Van has been signed in order for the public to be aware that this is an electric drive vehicle. Financial participant's names have been stenciled on the back door of the van. This vehicle is available for short term loan to interested utilities and companies. When other vehicles are obtained, the G-Van will be maintained on K-State's campus.

Hague, J.R.

1992-11-17T23:59:59.000Z

165

6 Million Tons of Mill Tailings Removed From DOE Moab Project Site |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Million Tons of Mill Tailings Removed From DOE Moab Project Site 6 Million Tons of Mill Tailings Removed From DOE Moab Project Site 6 Million Tons of Mill Tailings Removed From DOE Moab Project Site June 18, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Donald Metzler, Moab Federal Project Director (970) 257-2115 Wendee Ryan, S&K Aerospace Public Affairs Manager (970) 257-2145 (Grand Junction, CO) - Today, the Department of Energy (DOE) announced that 6 million tons of uranium mill tailings have been shipped from Moab, Utah, under the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project to an engineered disposal cell near Crescent Junction, Utah. The shipments mark continued progress toward relocating the 16-million-ton uranium mill tailings pile away from the Colorado River. "The federal budget continues to be stretched thin, and I am proud this

166

6 Million Tons of Mill Tailings Removed From DOE Moab Project Site |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Million Tons of Mill Tailings Removed From DOE Moab Project Site 6 Million Tons of Mill Tailings Removed From DOE Moab Project Site 6 Million Tons of Mill Tailings Removed From DOE Moab Project Site June 18, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Donald Metzler, Moab Federal Project Director (970) 257-2115 Wendee Ryan, S&K Aerospace Public Affairs Manager (970) 257-2145 (Grand Junction, CO) - Today, the Department of Energy (DOE) announced that 6 million tons of uranium mill tailings have been shipped from Moab, Utah, under the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project to an engineered disposal cell near Crescent Junction, Utah. The shipments mark continued progress toward relocating the 16-million-ton uranium mill tailings pile away from the Colorado River. "The federal budget continues to be stretched thin, and I am proud this

167

DOE Moab Site Cost-Effectively Eliminates 200 Million Gallons of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Moab Site Cost-Effectively Eliminates 200 Million Gallons of Moab Site Cost-Effectively Eliminates 200 Million Gallons of Contaminated Ground Water DOE Moab Site Cost-Effectively Eliminates 200 Million Gallons of Contaminated Ground Water July 29, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis View of the evaporation pond (right center) on the tailings pile with the forced-air evaporators running. The extraction wells are between the pile and the Colorado River, which can be seen in the lower left. View of the evaporation pond (right center) on the tailings pile with the forced-air evaporators running. The extraction wells are between the pile and the Colorado River, which can be seen in the lower left. Media Contacts Donald Metzler, donald.metzler@gjem.doe.gov (970) 257-2115 Wendee Ryan, wryan@gjemtac.doe.gov (970) 257-2145 Grand Junction, CO - The Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that

168

10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE Sites |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE 10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE Sites 10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE Sites 10 CFR 707, Federal Register, July 22, 1992 Amendment to 10 CFR 707, January 23, 2008 Executive Order 12564 10 CFR 707 Safety Advisory Implementation Assistance Frequently Asked Questions Implementation Dates 10 CFR 707 Public Forums - Video Conference Presentations Rulemaking Request for Information July 30, 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Economic Assessment Questionnaire Policy Memorandum Secretary of Energy's Decision Memorandum Regarding Drug Testing for DOE Positions That Require Access Authorizations, September 14, 2007 Tools Department of Health and Human Services: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's web site link(Click "Federal

169

DOE Best Practices Manual Focuses on Site Selection for CO2 Storage |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Best Practices Manual Focuses on Site Selection for CO2 Storage Best Practices Manual Focuses on Site Selection for CO2 Storage DOE Best Practices Manual Focuses on Site Selection for CO2 Storage January 5, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - The most promising methods for assessing potential carbon dioxide (CO2) geologic storage sites - a crucial component of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology - is the focus of the latest in a series of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CCS "best practices" manuals. Developed by the Office of Fossil Energy's (FE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), the manual - Site Screening, Site Selection and Initial Characterization for Storage of CO2 in Deep Geologic Formations - is a resource for future project developers and CO2 producers and transporters. It can also be used to apprise government agencies of the

170

DOE/WIPP-11-2225 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

11-2225 11-2225 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2010 U.S. Department of Energy September 2011 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2010 DOE/WIPP-11-2225 2 This page intentionally left blank Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2010 DOE/WIPP-11-2225 3 2010 Annual Site Environmental Report To our readers: This Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Annual Site Environmental Report for 2010 presents summary environmental data to (1) characterize site environmental management performance, (2) summarize environmental occurrences and responses reported during the calendar year, (3) confirm compliance with environmental standards and requirements, and (4) highlight the WIPP Environmental

171

DOE Completes Cleanup at New York, California Sites | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cleanup at New York, California Sites Cleanup at New York, California Sites DOE Completes Cleanup at New York, California Sites July 1, 2011 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - Last month, the U.S. Department of Energy completed the cleanup of Cold War legacy waste at the Nuclear Radiation Development, LLC (NRD) site near Grand Island, New York, and at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California. The two locations became the 18th and 19th sites to be completely cleaned of legacy waste. This milestone was achieved as part of a $172 million investment from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to expedite legacy waste cleanup activities across the DOE complex. "Cleanup of these two sites represents important and continued progress in the Department of Energy's commitment to reducing the nation's nuclear

172

DOE Best Practices Manual Focuses on Site Selection for CO2 Storage |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Best Practices Manual Focuses on Site Selection for CO2 Storage Best Practices Manual Focuses on Site Selection for CO2 Storage DOE Best Practices Manual Focuses on Site Selection for CO2 Storage January 5, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - The most promising methods for assessing potential carbon dioxide (CO2) geologic storage sites - a crucial component of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology - is the focus of the latest in a series of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CCS "best practices" manuals. Developed by the Office of Fossil Energy's (FE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), the manual - Site Screening, Site Selection and Initial Characterization for Storage of CO2 in Deep Geologic Formations - is a resource for future project developers and CO2 producers and transporters. It can also be used to apprise government agencies of the

173

DOE/OFVZ1949402 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DOE/OFVZ1949402 DOE/OFVZ1949402 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-ACO5-9%OR21949 Post-Remedial Action Report for the Former Baker Brothers Site Toledd, Ohio . February 1997 . . DOWORRl949-402 POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE REMEDIAL ACTION ATTHE FORMER BAKER BROTHERS SITE TOLEDO. OHIO FEBRUARY 1997 . United States Department of Energy I OakRidgeOpcrationsOfficc Under Contract No. DE-AC059 I OR2 1949 BY Bcchtcl National, Inc. . . : ; '.' OakRldnc.Tc~~~.- ~--~-' -------m . . Be&cl Job No. 14501 CQNTENTS FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~~................................................................................ iv TABLES . . . . . . . ..i.................................................................................................................................

174

DOE/WIPP-10-2225 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WIPP-10-2225 WIPP-10-2225 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2009 Errata U.S. Department of Energy September 2010 2 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2009 DOE/WIPP-10-2225 3 2009 Annual Site Environmental Report To our readers: This Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Annual Site Environmental Report for 2009 presents summary environmental data to (1) characterize site environmental management performance, (2) summarize environmental occurrences and responses reported during the calendar year, (3) confirm compliance with environmental standards and requirements, and (4) highlight the WIPP Environmental Management System (EMS), significant environmental programs, and accomplishments including progress toward the

175

DOE-2 Simulations for Cuero and Karnes County Prison Sites: Draft Progress Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The intent of this project was to model each of the large buildings at the Karnes County 2,250 bed and Cuero 1,000 bed prison sites with the DOE-2 building energy simulation program and to deliver a working model to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) for future use by TDCJ staff. The project was terminated prematurely and the DOE-2 input files for both sites were therefore not completed. This report details the work that remains and points out the steps that must be completed to properly calibrate the models.

Bou-Saada, T. E.; Munger, B. K.; Saman, N. F.; Haberl, J. S.

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

Review of Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) Assessments for the DOE Hanford Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this review is to assess the need for updating Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) assessments for the DOE's Hanford Site, as required by DOE Order 420.1B Chapter IV, Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation, based on significant changes in state-of-the-art NPH assessment methodology or site-specific information. This review is an update and expansion to the September 2010 review of PNNL-19751, Review of Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) Assessments for the Hanford 200 Areas (Non-Seismic).

Snow, Robert L.; Ross, Steven B.

2011-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

177

Berkeley Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Berkeley Site Office (BSO) BSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Berkeley Site Office U.S. Department of Energy One Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720 P: (510) 486-5784 E: bsowebinfo@bso.science.doe.gov Berkeley Site Office Photo © University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Berkeley Site Office (BSO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and administer the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) in Berkeley, California. LBNL, one of ten Office of Science Laboratories, is a multi-program

178

DOE REAL-TIME SEISMIC MONITORING AT ENHANCED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM SITES | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

REAL-TIME SEISMIC MONITORING AT ENHANCED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM SITES REAL-TIME SEISMIC MONITORING AT ENHANCED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM SITES Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Conference Proceedings: DOE REAL-TIME SEISMIC MONITORING AT ENHANCED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM SITES Details Activities (6) Areas (6) Regions (0) Abstract: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) at the direction of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Geothermal Technologies EGS Program is installing, operating, and/or interfacing seismic arrays at multiple Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) sites. The overall goal is to gather high resolution seismicity data before, during and after stimulation activities at the EGS projects. This will include both surface and borehole deployments (as necessary in available boreholes) to provide high quality

179

Development of the DOE Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Web Site for the Nuclear Criticality Safety Professional  

SciTech Connect

Development of the DOE Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) web site is the result of the efforts of marry members of the Nuclear Criticality Safety (NCS) community and is maintained by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under the direction of the NCSP Management Team. This World Wide Web (WWW) resource was developed as part of the DOE response to the DNFSB Recommendation 97-2, which reflected the need to make criticality safety information available to a wide audience. The NCSP web site provides information of interest to NCS professionals and includes links to other sites actively involved in the collection and dissemination of criticality safety information. To the extent possible, the hyperlinks on this web site direct the user to the original source of the referenced material in order to ensure access to the latest, most accurate version.

Lee, C.K.; Huang, S.; Morman, J.A.; Garcia, A.S.

2000-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

180

Transition and Closeout of the Former DOE Mound Plant Site: Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Environmental Management (EM) manages the Miamisburg Closure Project (MCP) by cleaning up the Mound site, located in Miamisburg, Ohio, to specific environmental standards, conveying all excess land parcels to the Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement Corporation, and transferring all continuing DOE post-closure responsibilities to the Office of Legacy Management (LM). Presently, the EM cleanup contract of the Mound site with CH2M Hill Mound Inc. is scheduled for completion on March 31, 2006. LM manages the Mound transition efforts and also post-closure responsibilities at other DOE sites via a contract with the S.M. Stoller Corporation. The programmatic transfer from EM to LM is scheduled to take place on October 1, 2006. The transition of the Mound site has required substantial integration and coordination between the EM and LM. Several project management principles have been implemented to help facilitate the transfer of programmatic responsibility. As a result, several lessons learned have been identified to help streamline and improve integration and coordination of the transfer process. Lessons learned from the Mound site transition project are considered a work in progress and have been summarized according to a work breakdown structure for specific functional areas in the transition schedule. The functional areas include program management, environmental, records management, information technology, property management, stakeholder and regulatory relations, procurement, worker pension and benefits, and project closeout. Specific improvements or best practices have been recognized and documented by the Mound transition team. The Mound site is one of three major cleanup sites within the EM organization scheduled for completion in 2006. EM, EM cleanup contractor, LM, and LM post-closure contractor have identified lessons learned during the transition and closure of the Mound site. The transition effort from environmental cleanup to post-closure operations is complex and requires creative and innovative solutions. Future environmental cleanups can benefit from the lessons learned gained by DOE and contractor organizations. (authors)

Carpenter, C. P. [U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Research Ridge 4, MS-K09, 3600 Collins Ferry Road, Morgantown, WV 26507 (United States); Marks, M. L.; Smiley, S.L. [U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management, Chiquita Building, 250 E. 5 th Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202 (United States); Gallaher, D. M. [S.M. Stoller Corporation, 955 Mound Road, Miamisburg, OH 45342 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- New Brunswick NJ Site - NJ 14  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Brunswick NJ Site - NJ 14 Brunswick NJ Site - NJ 14 FUSRAP Considered Sites New Brunswick, NJ Alternate Name(s): New Brunswick Laboratory NJ.14-1 Location: 986 Jersey Avenue, New Brunswick, New Jersey NJ.14-2 Historical Operations: Performed radiochemical analyses on uranium, thorium, beryllium, and zirconium metals and compounds for MED, AEC, ERDA, and DOE to support nuclear power and weapons programs. NJ.14-3 NJ.14-5 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NJ.14-1 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys, Verification Surveys NJ.14-2 NJ.14-4 NJ.14-6 Site Status: Certification Basis, Federal Register Notice Included NJ.14-5 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP Also see New Brunswick, New Jersey, Site

182

Characterization of candidate DOE sites for fabricating MOX fuel for lead assemblies  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Office of Fissile Materials Disposition (MD) of the Department of Energy (DOE) is directing the program to disposition US surplus weapons-usable plutonium. For the reactor option for disposition of this surplus plutonium, MD is seeking to contract with a consortium, which would include a mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel fabricator and a commercial US reactor operator, to fabricate and burn MOX fuel in existing commercial nuclear reactors. This option would entail establishing a MOX fuel fabrication facility under the direction of the consortium on an existing DOE site. Because of the lead time required to establish a MOX fuel fabrication facility and the need to qualify the MOX fuel for use in a commercial reactor, MD is considering the early fabrication of lead assemblies (LAs) in existing DOE facilities under the technical direction of the consortium. The LA facility would be expected to produce a minimum of 1 metric ton heavy metal per year and must be operational by June 2003. DOE operations offices were asked to identify candidate sites and facilities to be evaluated for suitability to fabricate MOX fuel LAs. Savannah River Site, Argonne National Laboratory-West, Hanford, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Los Alamos National Laboratory were identified as final candidates to host the LA project. A Site Evaluation Team (SET) worked with each site to develop viable plans for the LA project. SET then characterized the suitability of each of the five plans for fabricating MOX LAs using 28 attributes and documented the characterization to aid DOE and the consortium in selecting the site for the LA project. SET concluded that each option has relative advantages and disadvantages in comparison with other options; however, each could meet the requirements of the LA project as outlined by MD and SET.

Holdaway, R.F.; Miller, J.W.; Sease, J.D.; Moses, R.J.; O`Connor, D.G. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Carrell, R.D. [Technical Resources International, Inc., Richland, WA (United States); Jaeger, C.D. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Thompson, M.L.; Strasser, A.A. [Delta-21 Resources, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN (United States)

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

Site Environmental Report for calendar year 1998, DOE operations at Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power  

SciTech Connect

This Annual Site Environmental Report for 1998 describes the environmental conditions related to work performed for the Department of Energy (DOE) at Area IV of the Rocketdyne Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) and De Soto facilities. In the past, these operations included development, fabrication, and disassembly of nuclear reactors, reactor fuel, and other radioactive materials, under the Atomics International (AI) Division. Other activities included the operation of large-scale liquid metal facilities for testing of liquid metal fast breeder components at the Energy Technology Engineering Center (ETEC), a government-owned company-operated, test facility within Area IV. AI was merged into Rocketdyne in 1984 and many of the AI functions were transferred to existing Rocketdyne departments. All nuclear work was terminated in 1988, and subsequently, all radiological work has been directed toward decontamination and decommissioning (D and D) of the previously used nuclear facilities and associated site areas. Large-scale D and D activities of the sodium test facilities began in 1996. Results of the radiological monitoring program for the calendar year of 1998 continue to indicate that there are no significant releases of radioactive material from Rocketdyne sites. All potential exposure pathways are sampled and/or monitored, including air, soil, surface water, groundwater, and direct radiation. All radioactive wastes are processed for disposal at DOE disposal sites and other sites approved by DOE and licensed for radioactive waste. Liquid radioactive wastes are not released into the environment and do not constitute an exposure pathway.

Rutherford, P.D. [ed.] [ed.

1999-09-22T23:59:59.000Z

184

March 7, 2012, USW Health Safety and Environment Conference Presentations - Improving Safety Culture at DOE Sites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Improving Safety Culture Improving Safety Culture at DOE Sites William Eckroade Principal Deputy Chief for Mission Support Operations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy USW Health, Safety and Environment Conference HSS Workshop March 7, 2012 2 BACKGROUND WHAT IS SAFETY CULTURE? * Safety Culture: An organization's values and behaviors modeled by its leaders and internalized by its members, which serve to make safe performance of work the overriding priority to protect workers, the public, and the environment. KEY REGUALTORY DRIVERS: * DOE Policy 420.1, Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy * DOE Order 450.2, Integrated Safety Management * DOE Guide 450.4-1C, Integrated Safety Management System

185

Specific Administrative Controls Review at the Hanford Site with EM at DOE-RL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report on its Participation in a Review of Selected Aspects of Nuclear Safety at the Hanford Site Plutonium Finishing Plant, November 29 - December 3, 2010 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in the Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC) at the Hanford Site. The EM-23 review included selected programs at the Hanford Site that are under the auspices of the DOE Richland Operations Office. During the review, Independent Oversight personnel reviewed a few of the SACs applicable to the Plutonium Finishing Plant.

186

DOE and FERC Joint Public Statement on Back Stop Siting | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FERC Joint Public Statement on Back Stop Siting FERC Joint Public Statement on Back Stop Siting DOE and FERC Joint Public Statement on Back Stop Siting October 11, 2011 - 1:32pm Addthis Washington, D.C. - U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced today his decision that the Department of Energy will work more closely with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in reviewing proposed electric transmission projects under section 216 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), as an alternative to delegating additional authority to FERC. Chu said, "This nation promptly needs to build the electric grid of the 21st century to compete in the global economy. Enhanced cooperation between DOE and FERC is the best way to help achieve this goal. I look forward to working with Chairman Wellinghoff as we take steps to ease

187

DOE Completes Cleanup at New York, California Sites - Recovery Act funds  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Completes Cleanup at New York, California Sites - Recovery Act Completes Cleanup at New York, California Sites - Recovery Act funds accelerate cleanup; support job creation and footprint reduction DOE Completes Cleanup at New York, California Sites - Recovery Act funds accelerate cleanup; support job creation and footprint reduction July 1, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact 202-586-4940 WASHINGTON, D.C. - Last month, the U.S. Department of Energy completed the cleanup of Cold War legacy waste at the Nuclear Radiation Development, LLC (NRD) site near Grand Island, New York, and at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California. The two locations became the 18th and 19th sites to be completely cleaned of legacy waste. This milestone was achieved as part of a $172 million investment from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to expedite legacy waste cleanup

188

Descriptions of representative contaminated sites and facilities within the DOE complex  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has initiated efforts to prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) that will analyze the existing environmental restoration and waste management program and evaluate alternatives for an integrated program. The alternatives being evaluated include (1) a {open_quotes}No Action{close_quotes} alternative as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), (2) an Applicable, Relevant, and Appropriate Requirements (ARAR)-driven alternative, (3) a land-use-driven alternative, (4) a health-risk-driven alternative, and (5) a combination land-use and health-risk-driven alternative. The analytical approach being taken to evaluate each of these alternatives is to perform a remedial engineering analysis and human health and ecosystem effects analyses on every contaminated site and facility in the DOE complex. One of Pacific Northwest Laboratory`s (PNL) roles in this approach has been to compile the source term and environmental setting data needed to drive each of these analyses. To date, over 10,000 individual contaminated sites and facilities located throughout the DOE complex of installations have been identified and at least some minimal data compiled on each. The PEIS analyses have been appreciably simplified by categorizing all of these contaminated sites and facilities into six broad categories: (1) contaminated buildings, (2) contaminated soils, (3) solid waste sites (e.g., burial grounds), (4) liquid containment structures (e.g., tanks), (5) surface water sites, and (6) contaminated groundwater sites. A report containing a complete description of each of these thousands of contaminated sites and facilities would be tremendously large and unwildy, as would separate reports describing the application of the analytical methodologies to each.

Short, S.M.; Buck, J.W.; Clark, L.L.; Fletcher, J.F.; Glantz, C.S.; Holdren, G.R.; Huesties, L.R.; Williams, M.D. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States); Oates, L. [ICF, Richland, WA (United States)] [and others

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

Summary of the environmental dose models used at DOE nuclear sites in 1979  

SciTech Connect

Methods for assessing public exposure to radiation from normal operations at DOE facilities are reviewed in this report. This review includes a summary of the methods used in 1979 as described in annual environmental reports submitted by Department of Energy (DOE) contractors. The methods used ranged from estimating public doses based on environmental measurements and comparison to the DOE concentration guides, to complex methods using environmental pathway modeling and estimated radionuclide releases. No two sites used the same combination of measurements and pathway models in their analysis. While most sites used an atmospheric dispersion model to predict air concentrations of radioactive material, only about half of the sites provided enough information about the model used to permit proper model evaluation. The waterborne pathways related to drinking water or ingestion of fish were generally well described, while the external exposure or terrestrial food pathways were often not considered. The major recommendation resulting from this review was that complete documentations of the models used should be included either within the annual reports or as separate readily available documents. In addition, most sites could make better use of graphics (i.e., tables and figures) to better communicate the findings of their analyses.

Kennedy, W.E. Jr.; Mueller, M.A.

1982-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

190

DOE KSU EV Site Operator Program. [United States Department of Energy (DOE) Kansas State University (KSU) Electric Vehicle (EV)  

SciTech Connect

Kansas State University, with funding from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the DOE Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Kansas State is demonstrating, testing, and evaluating electric of hybrid vehicle technology. This will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU proposes to purchase one (1) electric or hybrid van and four(4) electric cars during the first two years of this five-year program. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has initiated a procurement order to purchase two (2) Soleq 1992 Ford EVcort station wagons. This quarter's report describes ongoing public relations activities and meetings as well as presenting performance data for the electric vehicles. (GHH)

Hague, J.R.; Steinert, R.A.; Nissen-Pfrang, T.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

191

DOE KSU EV Site Operator Program. [United States Department of Energy (DOE) Kansas State University (KSU) Electric Vehicle (EV)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Kansas State University, with funding from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the DOE Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Kansas State is demonstrating, testing, and evaluating electric of hybrid vehicle technology. This will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU proposes to purchase one (1) electric or hybrid van and four(4) electric cars during the first two years of this five-year program. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has initiated a procurement order to purchase two (2) Soleq 1992 Ford EVcort station wagons. This quarter's report describes ongoing public relations activities and meetings as well as presenting performance data for the electric vehicles. (GHH)

Hague, J.R.; Steinert, R.A.; Nissen-Pfrang, T.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

192

DOE/EV-0005/19 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

9 9 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Building Site 421, United States Watertown Arsenel, Watertown, MA February 1980 . Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology ~--.. _..-- DOE/EV-0005/19 UC-70 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiologidal Survey of the Building Site 421, United States Watertown Arsenel, Watertown, MA February 1980 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 by Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Illinois 60439 Under Contract No. W-31-1 09-ENG-38 -- _.. .-___

193

Brookhaven Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Brookhaven Site Office (BHSO) BHSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Brookhaven Site Office U.S. Department of Energy PO Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973 P: (631) 344-3425 E: TellDOE@bnl.gov Brookhaven Site Office Pictured Right: Ariel view of Brookhaven National Laboratory BHSO 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Brookhaven Site Office (BHSO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and manage the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) in Upton, New York. BNL is one of ten Office of Science Laboratories and is a multi-program laboratory with a primary mission on delivering breakthrough science and

194

Germantown Site History | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Germantown Site History Germantown Site History Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (51KB) BES Budget BES Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Organizational History Germantown Natural History President Kennedy's AEC Briefings Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) News & Resources Contact Information Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-22/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3081 F: (301) 903-6594 E: sc.bes@science.doe.gov More Information » Germantown Natural History Germantown Site History Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page U.S. Department of Energy Germantown Site History Why Germantown?

195

Photos of AEC Site Under Construction | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Photos of AEC Site Under Photos of AEC Site Under Construction Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (51KB) BES Budget BES Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Organizational History Germantown Natural History President Kennedy's AEC Briefings Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) News & Resources Contact Information Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-22/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3081 F: (301) 903-6594 E: sc.bes@science.doe.gov More Information » Germantown Natural History Photos of AEC Site Under Construction Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Photos of AEC Site Under Construction

196

DOE/EV-0005/16 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

6 6 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radic&@cal Survey of the St. Louis Airport Storage Site, St. Louis, Missouri September 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology .__ -. __ ..- -- DOE/EV-0005/16 UC-70 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the St. Louis Airport Storage Site, St. Louis, Missouri September 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Under Contract No. W-7405-ENG-26 .--__ _ .- _--- _ ~- Available from:

197

Solar site test module. [DOE/NASA solar heating and cooling demonstration installations  

SciTech Connect

A solar site test module using the Rockwell AIM 65 micro-computer is described. The module is designed to work at any site where an IBM site data acquisition system (SDAS) is installed and is intended primarily as a troubleshooting tool for DOE/NASA commercial solar heating and cooling system demonstration installations. It collects sensor information (temperatures, flow rates, etc.) and displays or prints it immediately in calibrated engineering units. It will read one sensor on demand, periodically read up to 10 sensors or periodically read all sensors. Performance calculations can also be included with sensor data. Unattended operation is possible to, e.g., monitor a group of sensors once per hour. Work is underway to add a data acquisition system to the test module so that it can be used at sites which have no SDAS.

Kissel, R.R.; Scott, D.R.

1980-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

198

Site Environmental Report for Calendar Year 1999. DOE Operations at The Boeing Company, Rocketdyne  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

OAK A271 Site Environmental Report for Calendar Year 1999. DOE Operations at The Boeing Company, Rocketdyne. This Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER) for 1999 describes the environmental conditions related to work performed for the Department of Energy (DOE) at Area IV of the Rocketdyne Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). In the past, these operations included development, fabrication, and disassembly of nuclear reactors, reactor fuel, and other radioactive materials under the former Atomics International Division. Other activities included the operation of large-scale liquid metal facilities for testing of liquid metal fast breeder components at the Energy Technology Engineering Center (ETEC), a government-owned, company-operated test facility within Area IV. All nuclear work was terminated in 1988, and subsequently, all radiological work has been directed toward decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) of the previously used nuclear facilities and associated site areas. Large-scale D&D activities of the sodium test facilities began in 1996. This Annual Site Environmental Report provides information showing that there are no indications of any potential impact on public health and safety due to the operations conducted at the SSFL. All measures and calculations of off-site conditions demonstrate compliance with applicable regulations, which provide for protection of human health and the environment.

None

2000-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

DOE site facility mgt contracts Internet Posting 5-2-11.xlsx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6/30/2011 6/30/2011 2 three month option periods until protest resolved 9/30/2011 M&O 1999 http://www.id.energy.gov/PSD/AMWTPHomepage.html Mike Adams 208-526-5277 Wendy Bauer 208-526-2808 Paducah Remediation EM LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky 4/22/2010 7/21/2015 7/21/2015 Site Clean up 2009 http://www.emcbc.doe.gov/dept/contracting/primecontracts.php Pam Thompson 859-219-4056 Bill Creech 859-219-4044 West Valley Demonstration Project EM West Valley Environmental Svcs 6/29/2007 6/30/2011 6/30/2011 Site Clean up 2007 http://www.emcbc.doe.gov/dept/contracting/primecontracts.php Ralph Holland 513-246-0550 Derrick Franklin 513-246-0103 Argonne National Laboratory SC UChicago Argonne, LLC 7/31/2006 9/30/2011 4 yrs Award Term Earned/additional 11 yrs Award

200

Third Buried Waste Retrieval Project under way at DOE Idaho Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Third Buried Waste Retrieval Project under way at DOE Idaho Site Third Buried Waste Retrieval Project under way at DOE Idaho Site The Idaho Cleanup Project has recently begun removing Cold War weapons waste from a third retrieval area at the Department of Energy�s Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC) in eastern Idaho. Inside Project III enclosure An inside view of the Accelerated Retrieval Project III enclosure Click on image for larger picture The Accelerated Retrieval Project-III (ARP-III) began retrieving targeted waste consisting of plutonium-contaminated filters, graphite molds, solidified radioactively and organically contaminated sludges and oxidized uranium material on December 10, 2008. These materials originated at the Rocky Flats Plant near Denver, Colorado, during nuclear weapons production activities in the 1960s and were packaged in drums and sent to Idaho for

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

DOE OE Permitting, Siting Analysis Division: Samples of State Technical Assistance Work as of June 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE OE Permitting, Siting DOE OE Permitting, Siting Analysis Division: Samples of State Technical Assistance Work as of June 2011 December 2008 State TA: Midwest Gov Assn/NCSL/National Council on Elec Policy/NGA/NASEO December 2008 State TA: Natl Conf of State Legislatures/ Natl Council on Elec Policy/Natl Gov Assn/Natl Assn of State Energy Offices December 2008 State TA: NCSL/NGA/NASEO/ National Council on Electricity Policy December 2008 Regulatory Assistance Project Sample Products: Utility Planning December 2008 Lawrence Berkeley Nat'l Lab (LBNL) Sample Products: Smart Grid & Demand Response December 2008 LBNL Sample Products: Ratepayer- Financed Energy Efficiency December 2008 LBNL Sample Products: EE Business Models for Use by PUCs December 2008 LBNL Sample Products: EE Evaluation, Measurement & Verification (EM&V)

202

Plutonium in groundwater at the 100K-Area of the U.S. DOE Hanford Site  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Engineer Works (HEW) as the world's first Pu production facility constructed for the United StatesPlutonium in groundwater at the 100K-Area of the U.S. DOE Hanford Site Minhan Daia,b , Ken O.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site. Total concentrations of Pu isotopes were extremely low (10?4 to 10

Buesseler, Ken

203

Plutonium in groundwater at the 100K-Area of the U.S. DOE Hanford Site  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Plutonium in groundwater at the 100K-Area of the U.S. DOE Hanford Site Minhan Daia,b , Ken O.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site. Total concentrations of Pu isotopes were extremely low (10?4 to 10 at least two local sources of groundwater Pu, namely, local Hanford reactor operations at the 100K

Buesseler, Ken

204

DOE responses to CDH October 1993 comments on the Remedical Action Plan for the Naturita, Colorado, Umtra Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document includes the October 1993 comments provided by the Colorado Department of Health (CDH) on the Department of Energy (DOE) Preliminary Final Remedial Action Plan for the Naturita, Colorado, UMTRA Site. DOE`s responses are included after each CDH comment.

NONE

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

205

Soil washing as a potential remediation technology for contaminated DOE sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Frequently detected contaminants at US Department of Energy (DOE) sites include radionuclides, heavy metals, and chlorinated hydrocarbons. Remediation of these sites requires application of several technologies used in concert with each other, because no single technology is universally applicable. Special situations, such as mixed waste, generally require innovative technology development. This paper, however, focuses on contaminated soils, for which soil washing and vitrification technologies appear to have wide ranging application potential. Because the volumes of contaminated soils around the DOE complex are so large, soil washing can offer a potentially inexpensive way to effect remediation or to attain waste volume reduction. As costs for disposal of low-level and mixed wastes continue to rise, it is likely that volume-reduction techniques and in-situ containment techniques will become increasingly important. This paper reviews the status of the soil washing technology, examines the systems that are currently available, and discusses the potential application of this technology to some DOE sites, with a focus on radionuclide contamination and, primarily, uranium-contaminated soils

Devgun, J.S.; Beskid, N.J. (Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)); Natsis, M.E. (Princeton Univ., NJ (United States)); Walker, J.S. (USDOE, Washington, DC (United States))

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

Soil washing as a potential remediation technology for contaminated DOE sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Frequently detected contaminants at US Department of Energy (DOE) sites include radionuclides, heavy metals, and chlorinated hydrocarbons. Remediation of these sites requires application of several technologies used in concert with each other, because no single technology is universally applicable. Special situations, such as mixed waste, generally require innovative technology development. This paper, however, focuses on contaminated soils, for which soil washing and vitrification technologies appear to have wide ranging application potential. Because the volumes of contaminated soils around the DOE complex are so large, soil washing can offer a potentially inexpensive way to effect remediation or to attain waste volume reduction. As costs for disposal of low-level and mixed wastes continue to rise, it is likely that volume-reduction techniques and in-situ containment techniques will become increasingly important. This paper reviews the status of the soil washing technology, examines the systems that are currently available, and discusses the potential application of this technology to some DOE sites, with a focus on radionuclide contamination and, primarily, uranium-contaminated soils

Devgun, J.S.; Beskid, N.J. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States); Natsis, M.E. [Princeton Univ., NJ (United States); Walker, J.S. [USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

207

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Niagara Falls Storage Site NY - NY 17  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Niagara Falls Storage Site NY - NY Niagara Falls Storage Site NY - NY 17 FUSRAP Considered Sites Niagara Falls Storage Site, NY Alternate Name(s): Lake Ontario Ordnance Works (LOOW) Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) DOE-Niagara Falls Storage Site NY.17-1 NY.17-3 Location: Lewiston, New York NY.17-5 Historical Operations: Stored, shipped, and buried radioactive equipment and waste for MED and AEC containing uranium, radium, and thorium. Contains Interim Waste Containment Structure. NY.17-1 NY.17-2 NY.17-14 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NY.17-4 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys NY.17-3 NY.17-5 NY.17-6 NY.17-7 NY.17-8 NY.17-9 NY.17-10 NY.17-11 NY.17-12 NY.17-14 Site Status: Cleanup in progress by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. NY.17-13 NY.17-14 NY.17-15 NY.17-16 USACE Website Long-term Care Requirements: To be determined upon completion.

208

Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power DOE Operations annual site environmental report 1997  

SciTech Connect

This annual report discusses environmental monitoring at two manufacturing and test sites operated in the Los Angeles area by Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power of Boeing North American, Inc. These are identified as Area 4 of the SSFL and the De Soto site. These sites have been used for research and development (R and D), engineering, and testing in a broad range of technical fields primarily in energy research and nuclear reactor technology. The De Soto site had research and development laboratories involved with nuclear research. This work was terminated in 1995 and only D and D activities will have potential for impact on the environment. Since 1956, Area 4 has been used for work with nuclear materials, including fabricating nuclear reactor fuels, testing nuclear reactors, and dissembling used fuel elements. This work ended in 1988 and subsequent efforts have been directed toward decommissioning and decontamination of the former nuclear facilities. The primary purpose of this report is to present information on environmental and effluent monitoring of DOE-sponsored activities to the regulatory agencies responsible for oversight. Information presented here concentrates on Area 4 at SSFL, which is the only area at SSFL where DOE operations were performed.

Robinson, K.S. [ed.

1998-11-23T23:59:59.000Z

209

DOE/OR/20722-88 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

88 88 . Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE WAYNE SITE - 1985 AND 1987 Wayne, New Jersey March 1989 Bechtel National, Inc. DOE/OR/20722-88 POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE WAYNE SITE - 1985 AND 1987 WAYNE, NEW JERSEY MARCH 1989 Prepared for UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE Under Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 BY R. M. Howard Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paqe 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 History Remedial Action Guidelines 5 Remedial Action 3.1 Cleanup/Decontamination Activities 3.2 Contamination Control During the Cleanup 8 8 11 Post-Remedial-Action Sampling 13

210

DOE/OR/21949-370 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1949-370 1949-370 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-AC05-91 OR21 949 Post-Remedial Action Report for the Removal Action at the Seymour Specialty Wire Site Seymour, Connecticut Printed on recyded/recyclable paper. @ 4.132 1890.1 January 1994 . DOE/OR/2 1949-370 POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE REMOVAL ACTION AT THE SEYMOUR SPECIALTY WIRE SITE SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT JANUARY 1994 Prepared for United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office Under Contract No. DE-AC05-9 1 OR2 1949 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 . \ CONTENTS Page FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . .

211

DOE Order 435.1 Performance Assessment Savannah River Site | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Order 435.1 Performance Assessment Savannah River Site Order 435.1 Performance Assessment Savannah River Site DOE Order 435.1 Performance Assessment Savannah River Site Performance Assessments (PA) are analyses conducted for low level radioactive waste disposal facilities (or appropriate CERCLA documentation for a low level radioactive waste disposal facility), and are critical in determining the nature and extent of the controls that need to be put in place at the facility being evaluated. There are specific requirements for the protection of the public, workers, and environment that are critical to maintaining safe and effective disposal of radioactive waste and the PA is a risk analysis of the potential hazards of disposing of low level radioactive waste. The review and approval of these evaluations is

212

CCI: Program Requirements  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Your Arrival Your First Day Weekly Activities Program Requirements Checkout FAQ The DOE WDTS site has comprehensive information on Participant Obligations. Consult that site for...

213

Geothermal well site restoration and plug and abandonment of wells, DOE Gladys McCall test site, Cameron Parish, Louisiana and DOE Willis Hulin test site, Vermillion Parish, Louisiana  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A report is presented on the final phase of an energy research program conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) involving two geothermal well sites in the State of Louisiana--the Gladys McCall site and the Willis Hulin site. The research program was intended to improve geothermal technology and to determine the efficacy of producing electricity commercially from geopressured resource sites. The final phase of the program consisted of plug and abandonment (P&A) of the wells and restoration of the well sites. Restoration involved (a) initial soil and water sampling and analysis; (b) removal and disposal of well pads, concrete, utility poles, and trash; (c) plugging of monitor and freshwater wells; and (d) site leveling and general cleanup. Restoration of the McCall site required removal of naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), which was costly and time-consuming. Exhibits are included that provide copies of work permits and authorizations, P&A reports, and cost and salvage reports. Site locations, grid maps, and photographs are provided.

Rinehart, Ben N.

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

214

Microsoft PowerPoint - Mark Phifer.CA as Decision Tool at DOE Sites.ppt  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Phifer Phifer May 25, 2011 Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange Composite Analysis: A DOE Site Decision Tool 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Year Dose (mrem/yr) AER Maximally Exposed Individual AER Irrigation AER MEI plus Irrigation SRS CA Savannah River Hwy 301 Bridge F o u r M ile B ra n ch F C Z E H S M c Q u e e n B ra n c h Up pe r Th re e Ru ns SRS Easting (ft) SRS Northing (ft) 50000 55000 60000 65000 7000 65000 70000 75000 80000 85000 Print Close 2 Composite Analysis - What Is It? PA CoP Technical Exchange 5/25/11 CA is a cumulative end state public dose projection Required by DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management To provide reasonable expectation of future public radiological protection Cumulative effect of all end state radioactive sources (e.g., CERCLA, RCRA, and D&D) at a DOE site that could interact

215

DOE Research Set-Aside Areas of the Savannah River Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Designated as the first of seven National Environmental Research Parks (NERPs) by the Atomic Energy Commission (now the Department of Energy), the Savannah River Site (SRS) is an important ecological component of the Southeastern Mixed Forest Ecoregion located along the Savannah River south of Aiken, South Carolina. Integral to the Savannah River Site NERP are the DOE Research Set-Aside Areas. Scattered across the SRS, these thirty tracts of land have been set aside for ecological research and are protected from public access and most routine Site maintenance and forest management activities. Ranging in size from 8.5 acres (3.44 ha) to 7,364 acres (2,980 ha), the thirty Set-Aside Areas total 14,005 acres (5,668 ha) and comprise approximately 7% of the Site`s total area. This system of Set-Aside Areas originally was established to represent the major plant communities and habitat types indigenous to the SRS (old-fields, sandhills, upland hardwood, mixed pine/hardwood, bottomland forests, swamp forests, Carolina bays, and fresh water streams and impoundments), as well as to preserve habitats for endangered, threatened, or rare plant and animal populations. Many long-term ecological studies are conducted in the Set-Asides, which also serve as control areas in evaluations of the potential impacts of SRS operations on other regions of the Site. The purpose of this document is to give an historical account of the SRS Set-Aside Program and to provide a descriptive profile of each of the Set-Aside Areas. These descriptions include a narrative for each Area, information on the plant communities and soil types found there, lists of sensitive plants and animals documented from each Area, an account of the ecological research conducted in each Area, locator and resource composition maps, and a list of Site-Use permits and publications associated with each Set-Aside.

Davis, C.E.; Janecek, L.L.

1997-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

216

DOE/EV-0005/15 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

5 5 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Bayo Canyon, Los Alamos, New Mexico June 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology DOE/EV-0005/15 UC-71 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Bayo Canyon, Los Alamos, New Mexico June 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Under Contract No. W-7405-ENG-36 Available from: National Technical Information Service (NTIS) U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161

217

DOE/EV-0005/10 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

0 0 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Former Horizons Inc., Metal Handling Facility, Cleveland, Ohio February 1979 - Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology DOE/EV-0005/10 UC-70 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Former Horizons Inc., Metal Handling Facility, Cleveland, Ohii February 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 Under Contract No. W-7405-ENG-26 By the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Available from: National Technical Information Service (NTIS)

218

DOE Site HSPD-12 Card Issuance Performance Measures 10-8-10.xls  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Field Field Sub-Total Savannah River Operations Office / SRS Oak Ridge - ETTP Idaho Operations Office / INL Richland Operations Office / Office of River Protection / Hanford Site Strategic Petroleum Reserve Office / SPR Site National Energy Technology Laboratory Golden Field Office National Renewable Energy Laboratory EMCBC Carlsbad Field Office / Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Portsmouth / Paducah DOE Naval Petroleum Reserves LM - Grand Junction / Ohio / Morgantown / Rocky Flats % of Target Sponsored 98% 99% 100% 96% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 98% 0% 100% % of Target Enrolled 94% 98% 94% 88% 99% 93% 99% 100% 0% 97% 99% 90% 0% 100% % of Target Delivered 90% 97% 93% 80% 89% 89% 98% 100% 0% 97% 91% 90% 0% 96% % of Target Activated 88% 96% 89% 76% 87% 87% 98% 100% 0% 96% 90% 86% 0% 92% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% HSPD-12 Card Issuance -

219

Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power DOE operations annual site environmental report 1996  

SciTech Connect

Rocketdyne currently operates several facilities in the San Fernando Valley/Simi Valley area, for manufacturing, testing, and research and development (R and D). These operations include manufacturing liquid-fueled rocket engines, such as the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) and engines used for expendable launch vehicles used to place artificial satellites into orbit. This work includes fabrication and testing of rocket engines, lasers, and heat-transfer systems; and R and D in a wide range of high-technology fields, such as the electrical power system for the Space Station. Previously, this work also included development, fabrication, and disassembly of nuclear reactors, reactor fuel, and other radioactive materials, under the Atomics International Division (AI). AI was merged into Rocketdyne in 1984 and many of the AI functions were transferred to existing Rocketdyne departments. This nuclear work was terminated in 1988, and subsequently, all radiological work has been directed toward decontamination and decommissioning (D and D) of the previously used nuclear facilities and associated site areas. The majority of this work is done for the Department of Energy (DOE). This Annual Site Environmental Report for 1996 concentrates on the environmental conditions related to DOE operations at Area IV of SSFL and at De Soto.

Tuttle, R.J. [ed.

1997-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

220

Pacific Northwest Laboratory FY 1993 Site Maintenance Plan for maintenance of DOE nonnuclear facilities  

SciTech Connect

This Site Maintenance Plan has been developed for Pacific Northwest Laboratory's (PNL) Nonnuclear Facilities. It is based on requirements specified by US Department of Energy (DOE) Order 4330.4A, Chapter I, Change No. 4. The objective of this maintenance plan is to provide baseline information for compliance to the DOE Order 4330.4A, to identify needed improvements, and to document the planned maintenance budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 1993 and to estimate maintenance budgets for FY 1994 and FY 1995 for all PNL facilities. Using the results of the self-assessment, PNL has selected 12 of the 36 elements of the Maintenance Program defined by DOE Order 4330.4A, Chapter I, for improvement. The elements selected for improvement are: Facility Condition Inspections; Work Request (Order) System; Formal Job Planning and Estimating; Work Performance (Time) Standards; Priority System; Maintenance Procedures and Other Work-Related Documents; Scheduling System; Post Maintenance Testing; Backlog Work Control; Equipment Repair History and Vendor Information; Work Sampling; and Identification and Control. Based upon a graded approach and current funding, those elements considered most important have been selected as goals for earliest compliance. Commitment dates for these elements have been established for compliance. The remaining elements of noncompliance will be targeted for implementation during later budget periods.

Bright, J.D.

1992-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Pacific Northwest Laboratory FY 1993 Site Maintenance Plan for maintenance of DOE nonnuclear facilities  

SciTech Connect

This Site Maintenance Plan has been developed for Pacific Northwest Laboratory`s (PNL) Nonnuclear Facilities. It is based on requirements specified by US Department of Energy (DOE) Order 4330.4A, Chapter I, Change No. 4. The objective of this maintenance plan is to provide baseline information for compliance to the DOE Order 4330.4A, to identify needed improvements, and to document the planned maintenance budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 1993 and to estimate maintenance budgets for FY 1994 and FY 1995 for all PNL facilities. Using the results of the self-assessment, PNL has selected 12 of the 36 elements of the Maintenance Program defined by DOE Order 4330.4A, Chapter I, for improvement. The elements selected for improvement are: Facility Condition Inspections; Work Request (Order) System; Formal Job Planning and Estimating; Work Performance (Time) Standards; Priority System; Maintenance Procedures and Other Work-Related Documents; Scheduling System; Post Maintenance Testing; Backlog Work Control; Equipment Repair History and Vendor Information; Work Sampling; and Identification and Control. Based upon a graded approach and current funding, those elements considered most important have been selected as goals for earliest compliance. Commitment dates for these elements have been established for compliance. The remaining elements of noncompliance will be targeted for implementation during later budget periods.

Bright, J.D.

1992-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

222

DOE/EA-1388: Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Uranium Mill Tailings Site (September 2001)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

388 388 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Uranium Mill Tailings Site Final September 2001 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-96GJ87335 This Page Intentionally Blank DOE Grand Junction Office EA of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Site September 2001 Final Page iii Contents Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ vii Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... ix 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................1

223

DEMONSTRATiON OF A SUBSURFACE CONTAINMENT SYSTEM FOR INSTALLATION AT DOE WASTE SITES  

SciTech Connect

Between 1952 and 1970, DOE buried mixed waste in pits and trenches that now have special cleanup needs. The disposal practices used decades ago left these landfills and other trenches, pits, and disposal sites filled with three million cubic meters of buried waste. This waste is becoming harmful to human safety and health. Today's cleanup and waste removal is time-consuming and expensive with some sites scheduled to complete cleanup by 2006 or later. An interim solution to the DOE buried waste problem is to encapsulate and hydraulically isolate the waste with a geomembrane barrier and monitor the performance of the barrier over its 50-yr lifetime. The installed containment barriers would isolate the buried waste and protect groundwater from pollutants until final remediations are completed. The DOE has awarded a contract to RAHCO International, Inc.; of Spokane, Washington; to design, develop, and test a novel subsurface barrier installation system, referred to as a Subsurface Containment System (SCS). The installed containment barrier consists of commercially available geomembrane materials that isolates the underground waste, similar to the way a swimming pools hold water, without disrupting hazardous material that was buried decades ago. The barrier protects soil and groundwater from contamination and effectively meets environmental cleanup standards while reducing risks, schedules, and costs. Constructing the subsurface containment barrier uses a combination of conventional and specialized equipment and a unique continuous construction process. This innovative equipment and construction method can construct a 1000-ft-long X 34-ft-wide X 30-ft-deep barrier at construction rates to 12 Wday (8 hr/day operation). Life cycle costs including RCRA cover and long-term monitoring range from approximately $380 to $590/cu yd of waste contained or $100 to $160/sq ft of placed barrier based upon the subsurface geology surrounding the waste. Project objectives for Phase I were to validate the SCS construction equipment and process, evaluate the system performance, validate the barrier constructability, and assess the barrier effectiveness. The objectives for Phase 11, which is a full-scale demonstration at a DOE site, are to perform an extensive characterization of the test site, to demonstrate the equipment and the installation process under site-specific performance and regulatory requirements, to validate the operational performance of the equipment, and to perform long-term verification of the barrier using monitoring wells. To date, significant progress has been made to establish the technical and economical feasibility of the SCS. This report describes the SCS conventional and specialized equipment, barrier materials, and construction process. It presents results of the specialized equipment Factory Test, the SCS Control Test and the SCS Advance Control Test at the RAHCO facility. Provided herein are the system performance capabilities and an estimated construction cost and schedule for a 1000-ft-long X 34-ft-wide X 29-ft-deep containment barrier at the DOE Oak Ridge Bear Creek Burial Grounds are also provided.

Thomas J. Crocker; Verna M. Carpenter

2003-05-21T23:59:59.000Z

224

Y-12 now a DOE-VPP Star site | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the DOE complex, DOE-VPP outlines areas in which participants can surpass compliance with DOE orders and OSHA standards. Currently 28 entities across the United States hold DOE-VPP...

225

US Department of Energy DOE Nevada Operations Office, Nevada Test Site: Underground safety and health standards  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Nevada Test Site Underground Safety and Health Standards Working Group was formed at the direction of John D. Stewart, Director, Nevada Test Site Office in April, 1990. The objective of the Working Group was to compile a safety and health standard from the California Tunnel Safety Orders and OSHA for the underground operations at the NTS, (excluding Yucca Mountain). These standards are called the NTS U/G Safety and Health Standards. The Working Group submits these standards as a RECOMMENDATION to the Director, NTSO. Although the Working Group considers these standards to be the most integrated and comprehensive standards that could be developed for NTS Underground Operations, the intent is not to supersede or replace any relevant DOE orders. Rather the intent is to collate the multiple safety and health references contained in DOE Order 5480.4 that have applicability to NTS Underground Operations into a single safety and heath standard to be used in the underground operations at the NTS. Each portion of the standard was included only after careful consideration by the Working Group and is judged to be both effective and appropriate. The specific methods and rationale used by the Working Group are outlined as follows: The letter from DOE/HQ, dated September 28, 1990 cited OSHA and the CTSO as the safety and health codes applicable to underground operations at the NTS. These mandated codes were each originally developed to be comprehensive, i.e., all underground operations of a particular type (e.g., tunnels in the case of the CTSO) were intended to be adequately regulated by the appropriate code. However, this is not true; the Working Group found extensive and confusing overlap in the codes in numerous areas. Other subjects and activities were addressed by the various codes in cursory fashion or not at all.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

226

Spectroelectrochemical Sensor for Pertechnetate Applicable to Hanford and Other DOE Sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During the period of this grant several significant milestones have been passed pursuant to designing a fluorescence sensor for pertechnetate (TcO4-). They are as follows: Fluorescence spectroelectrochemistry and less than picomolar limit of detection for a model non-radioactive analyte have been demonstrated. The spectroelectrochemical sensor and associated instrumentation for fluorescence mode of operation have been made, are portable, and easily transported to and used at DOE sites. The sensor has sufficient selectivity for its application to complex samples, even including tank waste, that exist at DOE sites such as the Hanford Site. Pertechnetate has been preconcentrated in sensor films and electrochemically reduced. This is the first critical step in operation of a spectroelectrochemical sensor for TcO4-. New Tc complexes have been made that fluoresce and these complexes have been preconcentrated and electrochemically modulated in a sensor film leading to fluorescence modulation, which is the second critical step in operation of the spectroelectrochemical sensor for TcO4-. We have determined that fluorescence offers a means of dramatically improving the limit of detection. Based on measurements on our new fluorescent complexes of Tc, we estimate the limit of detection for the sensor to be 5 x 10-12M. In related work, we have shown that the sensitivity of the spectroelectrochemical sensor for some metal cations can be improved by forming a metal complex with better optical and electrochemical properties. In addition, some heavy metals can be detected with the spectroelectrochemical sensor by depositing them directly as metals on the sensor surface.

Heineman, William R.; Seliskar, Carl J.; Bryan, Samuel A.; Hubler, Timothy L.

2009-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

227

Analytical Electron Microscopy examination of uranium contamination at the DOE Fernald operation site  

SciTech Connect

Analytical Electron Microscopy (AEM) has been used to identify uranium-bearing phases present in contaminated soils from the DOE Fernald operation site. A combination of optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy with backscattered electron detection (SEM/BSE), and AEM was used in isolating and characterizing uranium-rich regions of the contaminated soils. Soil samples were prepared for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) by ultramicrotomy using an embedding resin previously employed for aquatic colloids and biological samples. This preparation method allowed direct comparison between SEM and TEM images. At the macroscopic level much of the uranium appears to be associated with clays in the soils; however, electron beam analysis revealed that the uranium is present as discrete phases, including iron oxides, silicates (soddyite), phosphates (autunites), and fluorite. Only low levels of uranium were actually within the clay minerals. The distribution of uranium phases was inhomogeneous at the submicron level.

Buck, E.C.; Dietz, N.L.; Bates, J.K.; Cunnane, J.C.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

Feasibility studies on the use of TRUPACT-1 for on-site transportation of DOE LLW  

SciTech Connect

In this paper the authors propose using TRUPACT-I, with modifications to its storage system, to facilitate on-site transportation of US Department of Energy (DOE) low-level waste (LLW). TRUPACT-I was designed as a type-B contact-handled transuranic (CH-TRU) waste transportation system for use in Waste Isolation Pilot Plant-related operations and was subjected to the required type-B container accident tests, which it successfully passed. Thus, from a safety standpoint, TRUPACT-1 is provided with double containment, impact limitation, and fire-retardant capabilities. Furthermore, because TRUPACT-1 was developed to transport CH-TRU waste, which is characterized by a higher total activity, larger decay heat, and higher dose rate than LLW, it would be overqualified for the requirements of LLW transportation.

Hills, C.R.; Banjac, V.; Heger, A.S. (Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque (United States))

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

229

DOE KSU EV Site Operator Program. Year 1, fourth quarter report, April 1--June 30, 1992  

SciTech Connect

Kansas State University, with funding from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the DOE Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Kansas State is demonstrating, testing, and evaluating electric of hybrid vehicle technology. This will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU proposes to purchase one (1) electric or hybrid van and four(4) electric cars during the first two years of this five-year program. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has initiated a procurement order to purchase two (2) Soleq 1992 Ford EVcort station wagons. This quarter`s report describes ongoing public relations activities and meetings as well as presenting performance data for the electric vehicles. (GHH)

Hague, J.R.; Steinert, R.A.; Nissen-Pfrang, T.

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

DOE-STD-1024-92; DOE Standard Guidelines For Use of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Curves at Department of Energy Sites for Department of Energy Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

STD-1024-92 STD-1024-92 December 1992 Change Notice #1 January 1996 DOE STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR USE OF PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD CURVES AT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SITES FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA FACR Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; prices available from (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. Order No. DE93005386 DOE-STD-1024-92 (CH - 1) Subject: CHANGE NOTICE #1

231

DOE/EIS-0238, Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(1999) DOE proposes to continue operating the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) located in Los Alamos County, in north-central New Mexico. DOE has identified and...

232

Best Practices in Literature Research for the 10-Year Extreme Wind Update at the DOE Pantex Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Best Practices in Literature Review Best Practices in Literature Review for the 10 Year Extreme Wind Update at the DOE Pantex Site Presented by October 26, 2011 DOE Standards * DOE O 420.1 - Basis of Requirements * DOE 1020 - Soon to be updated * Development of several ANS consensus codes have replaced several older DOE standards New DOE 1020 for Wind NPH Analysis and Design Process * Step 1: Establish performance requirements for SSCs * Step 2: Calculate maximum NPH demands on SSCs resulting from NPH Events * Step 3: Design of SSCs to ensure their ability to maintain required functionality ANSI/ANS - 2.3 - 2011 Scope Establishes guidelines to estimate the frequency of occurrence and the magnitude of parameters associated with rare meteorological events such as tornadoes, hurricanes, and extreme

233

CLOSURE WELDING RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS CONTAINERS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) HANFORD SITE  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy's (DOE) responsibility for the disposition of radioactive materials has given rise to several unique welding applications. Many of these materials require packaging into containers for either Interim or long-term storage. It is not uncommon that final container fabrication, i.e., closure welding, is performed with these materials already placed into the container. Closure welding is typically performed remote to the container, and routine post-weld testing and nondestructive examination (NDE) are often times not feasible. Fluor Hanford has packaged many such materials in recent years as park of the Site's cleanup mission. In lieu of post-weld testing and NDE, the Fluor-Hanford approach has been to establish weld quality through ''upfront'' development and qualification of welding parameters, and then ensure parameter compliance during welding. This approach requires a rigor not usually afforded to typical welding development activities, and may involve statistical analysis and extensive testing, including burst, drop, sensitive leak testing, etc. This paper provides an instructive review of the development and qualification activities associated with the closure of radioactive materials containers, including a brief report on activities for closure welding research reactor, spent nuclear fuel (SNF) overpacks at the Hanford Site.

CANNELL, G.R.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

EMP Attachment 1 DOE-SC PNNL Site Sampling and Analysis Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) is written for the radiological environmental air surveillance program for the DOE-SC PNNL Site, Richland Washington. It provides the requirements for planning sampling events, and the requirements imposed on the analytical laboratory analyzing the air samples. The actual air sampling process is in procedure EPRP-AIR-029. The rationale for analyte selection, media, and sampling site location has been vetted through the data quality objectives (DQO) process (Barnett et al. 2010). The results from the DQO process have been reviewed and approved by the Washington State Department of Health. The DQO process (Barnett et al. 2010) identified seven specific radionuclides for analysis along with the need for gross alpha and gross beta radiological analyses. The analytes are {sup 241}Am, {sup 243}Am, {sup 244}Cm, {sup 60}Co, {sup 238}Pu, {sup 239}Pu, and {sup 233}U. The report also determined that air samples for particulates are the only sample matrix required for the monitoring program. These samples are collected on 47-mm glass-fiber filters.

Meier, Kirsten M.

2011-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

235

DOE Site HSPD-12 Card Issuance Performance Measures 10-8-10...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& NR Sub-Total Service Center (Includes NNSA Site Office Populations) Y-12 Site Kansas City Plant Honeywell Kirtland Pantex Plant Nevada Test Site Lawrence Livermore National...

236

DOE/EIS-0281; Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement, October 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

here to return to the Main Menu here to return to the Main Menu Volume I, Chapters 1-15 Volume II, Appendixes A- H Volume III, Comments and Responses Summary Contacts SANDIA NA TIONAL LABORA TORIES/NEW MEXICO FINAL SITE-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STA TEMENT Summary COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) COOPERATING AGENCY: U.S. AIR FORCE TITLE: Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (DOE/EIS-0281) CONTACT: For further information concerning the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (SWEIS), contact Julianne Levings, NEPA Document Manager U.S. DOE, Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400, Albuquerque, NM 87185 Telephone: 1-888-635-7305, Fax: 505-845-6392 For further information by way of electronic mail, contact

237

DOE/EA-1605: Environmental Assessment for Biomass Cogeneration and Heating Facilities at the Savannah River Site (August 2008)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

605 605 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR BIOMASS COGENERATION AND HEATING FACILITIES AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE AUGUST 2008 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE DOE/EA-1605 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR BIOMASS COGENERATION AND HEATING FACILITIES AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE AUGUST 2008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE This page intentionally left blank - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Background and Proposed Action ...............................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................4

238

DOE/EIS-0279; Savannah River Site Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (March 2000)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2000 Cover Sheet iii COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Savannah River Site, Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0279) CONTACT: For additional information on this environmental impact statement, write or call: Andrew R. Grainger, NEPA Compliance Officer U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Operations Office, Building 742A, Room 183

239

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Green River Mill Site - UT 0-01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Green River Mill Site - UT 0-01 Green River Mill Site - UT 0-01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Green River Mill Site (UT.0-01 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Green River, Utah, Disposal Site Documents Related to Green River Mill Site Data Validation Package for the June 2009 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Green River, Utah, Disposal Site; LMS/GRN/S0609; October 2009 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Green River, Utah, Disposal Site. LMS/S09461. February 2013 Historic Fact Sheet: Green River Disposal Site Uranium ore was

240

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gunnison Mill Site - CO 0-06  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Gunnison Mill Site - CO 0-06 Gunnison Mill Site - CO 0-06 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Gunnison Mill Site (CO.0-06 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Gunnison, Colorado, Processing Site Documents Related to Gunnison Mill Site Verification Montioring Report for the Gunnison, Colorado, Processing Site, September 2007. 2011 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Gunnison, Colorado, Disposal Site. LMS/S08056. January 2012 U.S. Department of Energy 2009 UMTRCA Title I Annual Report January 2010 Gunnison, Colorado Page 8-1 8.0 Gunnison, Colorado, Disposal Site

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Does  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Does Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Yu-San Liu Æ Yining Zeng Æ Yonghua Luo Æ Qi Xu Æ Michael E. Himmel Æ Steve J. Smith Æ Shi-You Ding Received: 26 November 2008 / Accepted: 11 May 2009 / Published online: 19 June 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Exoglucanases are key enzymes required for the efficient hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. It has been proposed that exoglucanases hydrolyze cellulose chains in a processive manner to produce primarily cellobiose. Usually, two functional modules are involved in the processive mechanism: a catalytic module and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). In this report, single molecule tracking techniques were used to analyze the molecular motion of CBMs labeled with quantum dots (QDs) and bound to cellulose crystals. By tracking the single QD, we observed that the family 2 CBM from

242

THE ROLE OF LAND USE IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING AT THREE DOE MEGA-CLEANUP SITES FERNALD & ROCKY FLATS & MOUND  

SciTech Connect

This paper explores the role that future land use decisions have played in the establishment of cost-effective cleanup objectives and the setting of environmental media cleanup levels for the three major U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites for which cleanup has now been successfully completed: the Rocky Flats, Mound, and Fernald Closure Sites. At each site, there are distinct consensus-building histories throughout the following four phases: (1) the facility shut-down and site investigation phase, which took place at the completion of their Cold War nuclear-material production missions; (2) the decision-making phase, whereby stakeholder and regulatory-agency consensus was achieved for the future land-use-based environmental decisions confronting the sites; (3) the remedy selection phase, whereby appropriate remedial actions were identified to achieve the future land-use-based decisions; and (4) the implementation phase, whereby the selected remedial actions for these high-profile sites were implemented and successfully closed out. At each of the three projects, there were strained relationships and distrust between the local community and the DOE as a result of site contamination and potential health effects to the workers and local residents. To engage citizens and interested stakeholder groups - particularly in the role of final land use in the decision-making process, the site management teams at each respective site developed new public-participation strategies to open stakeholder communication channels with site leadership, technical staff, and the regulatory agencies. This action proved invaluable to the success of the projects and reaching consensus on appropriate levels of cleanup. With the implementation of the cleanup remedies now complete, each of the three DOE sites have become models for future environmental-remediation projects and associated decision making.

JEWETT MA

2011-01-14T23:59:59.000Z

243

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Tuba City Mill Site - AZ 0-02  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Mill Site - AZ 0-02 Mill Site - AZ 0-02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Tuba City Mill Site (AZ.0-02 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site Documents Related to Tuba City Mill Site 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site. LMS/S09461. February 2013 2008 UMTRCA Title I Annual Report January 2009 Tuba City, Arizona February 2009 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Tuba City, Arizona Disposal Site May 2009 This fact sheet provides information about the Uranium Mill Tailings

244

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Palos Park Forest Preserve Site (A  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Palos Park Forest Preserve Site (A Palos Park Forest Preserve Site (A Plot M) - IL 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Palos Park Forest Preserve Site (A/Plot M) (IL.04 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Site A/Plot M, Illinois, Decommissioned Reactor Site Documents Related to Palos Park Forest Preserve Site (A/Plot M) Surveillance of Site A and Plot M Report for 2011. ANL-12/01 Surveillance of Site A and Plot M Report for 2007 Environment, Safety, and Health/Quality Assurance Oversight Division Surveillance of Site A and Plot M Report for 2009. ANL-10/01. April 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Environmental

245

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rifle Mill Site - CO 0-11  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Rifle Mill Site - CO 0-11 Rifle Mill Site - CO 0-11 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Rifle Mill Site (CO.0-11 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Rifle, Colorado, New Processing Site Rifle, Colorado, Old Processing Site Documents Related to Rifle Mill Site 2009 Verification Monitoring Report for the Old and New Rifle, Colorado, Processing Sites; LMS/RFO/RFN/S05775; September 2009. This report evaluates and interprets groundwater monitoring data collected at the Old and New Rifle Sites and assesses the progress of meeting the compliance strategy for groundwater cleanup. 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill

246

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Naturita Mill Site - CO 0-08  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Naturita Mill Site - CO 0-08 Naturita Mill Site - CO 0-08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Naturita Mill Site (CO.0-08) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Naturita, Colorado, Processing Site Documents Related to Naturita Mill Site Data Validation Package for the July and October 2008 Water Sampling at the Naturita Processing and Disposal Sites Data Validation Report for the July 2009 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Naturita, Colorado, Processing Site; LMS/NAP/S00709; October 2009 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Naturita, Colorado,

247

Final report for the geothermal well site restoration and plug and abandonment of wells: DOE Pleasant Bayou test site, Brazoria County, Texas  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

For a variety of reasons, thousands of oil and gas wells have been abandoned in the Gulf Coast Region of the United States. Many of these wells penetrated geopressured zones whose resource potential for power generation was undervalued or ignored. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Geopressured-Geothermal Research Program was chartered to improve geothermal technology to the point where electricity could be commercially produced from a substantial number of geopressured resource sites. This research program focused on relatively narrow technical issues that are unique to geopressured resources such as the ability to predict reservoir production capacity based on preliminary flow tests. Three well sites were selected for the research program. These are the Willis Hulin and Gladys McCall sites in Louisiana, and the Pleasant Bayou site in Texas. The final phase of this research project consists of plug and abandonment (P&A) of the wells and site restoration.

Rinehart, Ben N.; Seigel, Ben H.

1994-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

248

CHARACTERIZING DOE HANFORD SITE WASTE ENCAPSULATION STORAGE FACILITY CELLS USING RADBALL  

SciTech Connect

RadBall{trademark} is a novel technology that can locate and quantify unknown radioactive hazards within contaminated areas, hot cells, and gloveboxes. The device consists of a colander-like outer tungsten collimator that houses a radiation-sensitive polymer semi-sphere. The collimator has a number of small holes with tungsten inserts; as a result, specific areas of the polymer are exposed to radiation becoming increasingly more opaque in proportion to the absorbed dose. The polymer semi-sphere is imaged in an optical computed tomography scanner that produces a high resolution 3D map of optical attenuation coefficients. A subsequent analysis of the optical attenuation data using a reverse ray tracing or backprojection technique provides information on the spatial distribution of gamma-ray sources in a given area forming a 3D characterization of the area of interest. RadBall{trademark} was originally designed for dry deployments and several tests, completed at Savannah River National Laboratory and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, substantiate its modeled capabilities. This study involves the investigation of the RadBall{trademark} technology during four submerged deployments in two water filled cells at the DOE Hanford Site's Waste Encapsulation Storage Facility.

Farfan, E.; Coleman, R.

2011-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

249

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- West Milton Reactor Site - NY 21  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Milton Reactor Site - NY 21 Milton Reactor Site - NY 21 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: West Milton Reactor Site (NY.21) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is one of a group of 77 FUSRAP considered sites for which few, if any records are available in their respective site files to provide an historical account of past operations and their relationship, if any, with MED/AEC operations. Reviews of contact lists, accountable station lists, health and safety records and other documentation of the period do not provide sufficient information to warrant further search of historical records for information on these sites. These site files remain "open" to

250

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Project Gas Buggy Site - NM 14  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Gas Buggy Site - NM 14 Gas Buggy Site - NM 14 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Project Gas Buggy Site (NM.14 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Gasbuggy, New Mexico, Site Nevada Test Site History Documents Related to Project Gas Buggy Site Fact Sheet Gasbuggy, New Mexico The Gasbuggy Site is located in northwestern New Mexico in Rio Arriba County approximately 55 miles east of the city of Farmington and approximately 12 miles southwest of Dulce, New Mexico, in the Carson National Forest. Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico, December 1993.

251

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Monument Valley Mill Site - AZ 0-01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Monument Valley Mill Site - AZ 0-01 Monument Valley Mill Site - AZ 0-01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Monument Valley Mill Site (AZ.0-01) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Monument Valley, Arizona, Processing Site Documents Related to Monument Valley Mill Site Data Validation Package for the June 2009 Water Sampling at the Monument Valley, Arizona, Processing Site; LMS/MON/S0609; October 2009 Natural and Enhanced Attenuation of Soil and Ground Water at Monument Valley, Arizona, and Shiprock, New Mexico 2006 Status Report June 2008 Data Validation Package for 2007 Groundwater Sampling at the Monument Valley, AZ Processing Site

252

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Spook Site - WY 0-01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Spook Site - WY 0-01 Spook Site - WY 0-01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Spook Site (WY.0-01) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Documents Related to Spook Site 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Spook, Wyoming, Disposal Site. LMS/S09461. February 2013 U.S. Department of Energy 2008 UMTRCA Title I Annual Report January 2009 Spook, Wyoming U.S. Department of Energy 2007 UMTRCA Title I Annual Report December 2007 Spook, Wyoming FACT SHEET - Spook, Wyoming This fact sheet provides information about the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 Title I

253

Photos of AEC Site Under Construction | U.S. DOE Office of Science...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Photos of AEC Site Under Construction Farm Site 1955 aerial photograph of the farm site that was selected for construction of the AEC's...

254

Internal Site Office Operations | U.S. DOE Office of Science...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

(113KB) Federal Stewardship Internal Site Office Operations Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Ames Site...

255

DOE Site HSPD-12 Card Issuance Performance Measures 10-8-10...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Operations Office New Brunswick Laboratory Brookhaven Site Office Brookhaven National Laboratory Ames Area Office Ames Laboratory Argonne Site Office Argonne National...

256

DOE  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

DOE DOE /E/A- 0202( 83//Q J Sh or t-T er m En er gy O ut lo ok a to m Quar terly Proje ction s Febru ary 1983 Ene rgy Info rma tion Adm inist ratio n Was hing ton, D.C. t rt jrt .or t lor t lor t .lor t- ior t- ior t <.o rt ort . m .er m -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -T erm -T erm -T erm Nrm ue rgy En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y ^n erg y Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Sh ort -T erm 1 Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm

257

Application of microseismic technology to hydraulic fracture diagnostics: GRI/DOE Field Fracturing Multi-Sites Project  

SciTech Connect

The objective of the Field Fracturing Multi-Sites Project (M-Site) is to conduct field experiments and analyze data that will result in definitive determinations of hydraulic fracture dimensions using remote well and treatment well diagnostic techniques. In addition, experiments will be conducted to provide data that will resolve significant unknowns with regard to hydraulic fracture modeling, fracture fluid rheology and fracture treatment design. These experiments will be supported by a well-characterized subsurface environment as well as surface facilities and equipment conducive to acquiring high-quality data. It is anticipated that the project`s research advancements will provide a foundation for a fracture diagnostic service industry and hydraulic fracture optimization based on measured fracture response. The M-Site Project is jointly sponsored by the Gas Research Institute (GRI) and the US Department of Energy (DOE). The site developed for M-Site hydraulic fracture experimentation is the former DOE Multiwell Experiment (MWX) site located near Rifle, Colorado. The MWX project drilled three closely-spaced wells (MWX-1, MWX-2 and MWX-3) which were the basis for extensive reservoir analyses and tight gas sand characterizations in the blanket and lenticular sandstone bodies of the Mesaverde Group. The research results and background knowledge gained from the MWX project are directly applicable to research in the current M-Site Project.

Wilmer, R. [CER Corp., Las Vegas, NV (United States); Warpinski, N.R. [Sandia National Laboratories (United States); Wright, T.B. [Resources Engineering Systems (United States); Branagan, P.T. [Branagan & Associates (United States); Fix, J.E. [Fix & Associates (United States)

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

DOE/EIS-0279; Savannah River Site Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (March 2000)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2000 Summary S-iii COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Savannah River Site, Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0279) CONTACT: For additional information on this environmental impact statement, write or call: Andrew R. Grainger, NEPA Compliance Officer U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Operations Office, Building 742A, Room 183 Aiken, South Carolina 29802 Attention: Spent Nuclear Fuel Management EIS Local and Nationwide Telephone: (800) 881-7292 Email: nepa@SRS.gov The EIS is also available on the internet at: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/nepa/docs/docs.htm. For general information on the process that DOE follows in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act, write or call:

259

DOE/EIS-0279; Savannah River Site Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (March 2000)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Summary Summary S-iii COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Savannah River Site, Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0279) CONTACT: For additional information on this environmental impact statement, write or call: Andrew R. Grainger, NEPA Compliance Officer U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Operations Office, Building 742A, Room 183 Aiken, South Carolina 29802 Attention: Spent Nuclear Fuel Management EIS Local and Nationwide Telephone: (800) 881-7292 Email: nepa@SRS.gov The EIS is also available on the internet at: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/nepa/docs/docs.htm. For general information on the process that DOE follows in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act, write or call:

260

DOE/EIS-0279; Savannah River Site Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (March 2000)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cover Sheet Cover Sheet iii COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Savannah River Site, Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0279) CONTACT: For additional information on this environmental impact statement, write or call: Andrew R. Grainger, NEPA Compliance Officer U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Operations Office, Building 742A, Room 183 Aiken, South Carolina 29802 Attention: Spent Nuclear Fuel Management EIS Local and Nationwide Telephone: (800) 881-7292 Email: nepa@SRS.gov The EIS is also available on the internet at: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/nepa/docs/docs.htm. For general information on the process that DOE follows in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act, write or call:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Research on jet mixing of settled sludges in nuclear waste tanks at Hanford and other DOE sites: A historical perspective  

SciTech Connect

Jet mixer pumps will be used in the Hanford Site double-shell tanks to mobilize and mix the settled solids layer (sludge) with the tank supernatant liquid. Predicting the performance of the jet mixer pumps has been the subject of analysis and testing at Hanford and other U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) waste sites. One important aspect of mixer pump performance is sludge mobilization. The research that correlates mixer pump design and operation with the extent of sludge mobilization is the subject of this report. Sludge mobilization tests have been conducted in tanks ranging from 1/25-scale (3 ft-diameter) to full scale have been conducted at Hanford and other DOE sites over the past 20 years. These tests are described in Sections 3.0 and 4.0 of this report. The computational modeling of sludge mobilization and mixing that has been performed at Hanford is discussed in Section 5.0.

Powell, M.R.; Onishi, Y.; Shekarriz, R.

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Reactor Site - Fort Belvoir - VA 0-02  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reactor Site - Fort Belvoir - VA Reactor Site - Fort Belvoir - VA 0-02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: REACTOR SITE - FORT BELVOIR (VA.0-02 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DOD Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Fort Belvoir , Virginia VA.0-02-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 VA.0-02-1 Site Operations: No evidence of AEC involvement with reactor operations. AEC conducted health and safety inspections of this site. Probably a licensed operation. VA.0-02-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Referred to DOD VA.0-02-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Reactor fuel Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Reactor Fuel Radiological Survey(s): Health and safety inspections VA.0-02-1 Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DOD VA.0-02-1

263

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Columbus East OH Site - OH 26  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Columbus East OH Site - OH 26 Columbus East OH Site - OH 26 FUSRAP Considered Sites Columbus East, OH Alternate Name(s): B&T Metals Site OH.26-1 Location: 425 West Town Street, Columbus, Ohio OH.26-3 Historical Operations: Performed extrusion and machining on natural uranium metal billets to support MED. OH.26-4 OH.26-7 Eligibility Determination: Eligible OH.26-1 OH.26-2 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Survey, Verification Survey OH.26-5 OH.26-6 Site Status: Certified - Certification Basis, Federal Register Notice included OH.26-8 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP Also see Columbus East, OH, Site Documents Related to Columbus East, OH Columbus East Site Aerial Photograph FACT SHEET Office of Legacy Management Columbus East, Ohio, Site

264

| OR. I-12- DOE/OR/20722-29 UC-70A Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of buildings in the northernmost 11.7 ha (29 acres) of the site; a 0.8-na (2-acre) Biomass Research Facility (inactive), which occupies the center of the site; and a 5.7 ha (14...

265

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 98-02, DOE Enforcement Activities where Off-site Transporation Issues are also Present  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EGS:98-02 Appendix E - Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 15, 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 98-02: DOE Enforcement Activities where Off-site Transportation Issues are also Present Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity to the Office of Enforcement and Investigation to issue clarifying guidance from time to time with respect to the processes used in its enforcement activities. Recently several questions have arisen regarding the scope of Price-Anderson

266

Benefits | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Benefits Benefits Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Benefits Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Selected faculty and participating students spend 10 weeks (Summer Term) at a DOE national laboratory engaged in a research project under the guidance of a laboratory scientist. Faculty members build collaborative relationships with DOE research scientists, become familiar with DOE sponsored research programs, scientific user facilities, and potential funding opportunities. Students participate in enrichment activities, including career professional development workshops (e.g. technical and scientific writing skills development, poster, or oral presentation activities, etc.),

267

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Palmerton Ore Buying Site - PA 33  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Palmerton Ore Buying Site - PA 33 Palmerton Ore Buying Site - PA 33 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: PALMERTON ORE BUYING SITE (PA.33) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: New Jersey Zinc Company PA.33-1 Location: Palmerton , Pennsylvania PA.33-2 Evaluation Year: 1994 PA.33-3 Site Operations: Mid-1950s - AEC leased the New Jersey Zinc Company property and established a uranium ore stockpile on the property in the vicinity of Palmerton, PA. PA.33-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for residual contamination and resulting exposure beyond that associated with natural background radiation considered remote PA.33-3 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium Ore PA.33-4 Radiological Survey(s): Yes PA.33-5

268

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bayo Canyon NM Site - NM 01  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Bayo Canyon NM Site - NM 01 Bayo Canyon NM Site - NM 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Bayo Canyon, NM Alternate Name(s): Bayo Canyon Area Bayo Canyon (TA-10) Site NM.01-2 Location: Canyon in the Pajarito Plateau Region in Los Alamos County, Los Alamos, NM NM.01-3 Historical Operations: Used in 1944-1961 by the MED and later AEC at Los Alamos National Laboratory as a firing site for conventional and high-explosives experiments involving natural and depleted uranium, strontium, and lanthanum as a radiation source for blast diagnosis. NM.01-3 NM.01-5 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NM.01-1 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Survey NM.01-3 Site Status: Certified- Certification Basis NM.01-5 NM.01-6 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP

269

Submitting a Proposal to DOE | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Submitting a Proposal to DOE Submitting a Proposal to DOE Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Developing a Research Proposal Recommender Information Student Participants Submitting a Proposal to DOE Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Submitting a Proposal to DOE Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Through direct collaboration with research staff at DOE host laboratories, the VFP program provides an opportunity for faculty to help create innovative new capabilities and make discoveries germane to DOE science missions. Through the experience, visiting faculty members also develop integrated skills that translate to programs at their home institutions,

270

Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Developing a Research Proposal Recommender Information Student Participants Submitting a Proposal to DOE Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page FY 2013 Participating DOE Laboratories and Contacts DOE Laboratory Laboratory VFP Contact Ames Laboratory - Ames, IA Steve Karsjen, karsjen@ameslab.gov Argonne National Laboratory - Argonne, IL Lou Harnisch, Lharnisch@anl.gov Brookhaven National Laboratory - Upton, NY Noel Blackburn, blackburn@bnl.gov Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory - Batavia, IL Marge Bardeen, mbardeen@fnal.gov

271

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- New York, NY, Site - NY 61  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

York, NY, Site - NY 61 York, NY, Site - NY 61 FUSRAP Considered Sites New York, NY Alternate Name(s): Baker and Williams Warehouses Ralph Ferrara Company Warehouses Ralph Ferrara, Inc. NY.61-2 Location: 513-519, 521-527, and 529-535 West 20th Street, New York, New York NY.61-3 Historical Operations: Received and stored uranium ores and concentrates for MED. NY.61-5 NY.61-6 NY.61-7 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NY.61-1 NY.61-2 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys, Verification Surveys NY.61-3 NY.61-4 NY.61-8 NY.61-9 NY.61-10 Site Status: Certified - Certification Basis, Federal Register Notice Included NY.61-11 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP Also see New York, New York, Site

272

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Chicago North IL Site - IL 05  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

North IL Site - IL 05 North IL Site - IL 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Chicago North, IL Alternate Name(s): National Guard Armory 124th Field Artillery Armory Illinois National Guard Armory Site IL.05-4 IL.05-5 Location: 5200 Cottage Grove Avenue, Chicago, Illinois IL.05-4 Historical Operations: Processed and stored uranium metal, resulting in uranium metal and dry uranium oxide contamination. Metallurgical operations were conducted by the University of Chicago, an MED contractor. IL.05-5 IL.05-7 IL.05-8 Eligibility Determination: Eligible IL.05-1 IL.05-2 IL.05-3 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys, Verification Surveys IL.05-6 IL.05-7 Site Status: Certified-Certification Basis, Federal Register Notice Included IL.05-7 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP

273

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Indian Orchard MA Site - MA 08  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Indian Orchard MA Site - MA 08 Indian Orchard MA Site - MA 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Indian Orchard, MA Alternate Name(s): Chapman Valve Manufacturing Company Chapman Valve Site Crane Company MA.08-3 MA.08-4 Location: 203 Hampshire Street, Indian Orchard, Massachusetts MA.08-2 Historical Operations: Machined extruded natural uranium rods and supplied valves and other products to MED and AEC. Also machined natural uranium rods into slugs for Brookhaven National Laboratory. MA.08-6 MA.08-7 MA.08-8 MA.08-14 Eligibility Determination: Eligible MA.08-2 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Survey, Verification Survey MA.08-11 MA.08-12 Site Status: Certified - Certification Basis, Federal Register Notice included. MA.08-13 MA.08-14 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP

274

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Chupadera Mesa NM Site - NM 04  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Chupadera Mesa NM Site - NM 04 Chupadera Mesa NM Site - NM 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Chupadera Mesa, NM Alternate Name(s): None Location: Approximately 28 miles northeast of the Trinity nuclear test site on the White Sands Missile Range, Northeast of Bingham, New Mexico NM.04-5 Historical Operations: Received the deposition of longer-lived radionuclides in the fallout from the nuclear test, primarily cesium-137, strontium-90, plutonium-239, cobalt-60, and europium-155. NM.04-2 NM.04-5 Eligibility Determination: No further action required. Radiation levels below cleaunup criteria. NM.04-1 NM.04-2 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys NM.04-3 NM.04-4 Site Status: NA - No Further Action Required NM.04-1 NM.04-2 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP

275

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Middlesex North NJ Site - NJ 05  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Middlesex North NJ Site - NJ 05 Middlesex North NJ Site - NJ 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Middlesex North, NJ Alternate Name(s): Middlesex Landfill Middlesex Municipal Landfill NJ.05-2 NJ.05-4 Location: Mountain Avenue to Bound Brook, Middlesex, New Jersey NJ.05-2 Historical Operations: Served as a disposal site for low-level radioactive pitchblende ore generated from activites at the Middlesex Sampling Plant. NJ.05-2 NJ.05-3 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NJ.05-1 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys NJ.05-3 NJ.05-4 Site Status: Certification Basis and Federal Register Notice. USACE determination for additional remediation is pending. NJ.05-5 NJ.05-6 Long-term Care Requirements: Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites S07566_FUSRAP

276

DOE_site_facility_mgt_contracts_Internet_Posting_3-21-11.pdf...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

.pdf DOEsitefacilitymgtcontractsInternetPosting3-21-11.pdf DOEsitefacilitymgtcontractsInternetPosting3-21-11.pdf More Documents & Publications DOEMajorSiteFacilityCon...

277

Germantown Site History | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Germantown Site History Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (53KB) BES Budget BES Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Organizational...

278

Frequently Asked Questions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Frequently Frequently Asked Questions Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) SULI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Frequently Asked Questions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page TABLE OF CONTENTS General Eligibility Applications Selection Participation Sponsor GENERAL When is the application deadline? The application deadline for the 2014 Summer SULI Term is January 10, 2014 5:00 PM ET. Who administers this program for the Department of Energy? The DOE Office of Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) manages this program in collaboration with the DOE National Laboratories who host the student participants. Back to Top Back to Top ELIGIBILITY Can I apply if I don't currently have legal permanent resident alien (PRA)

279

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office (OSO) OSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Contact Information Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office U.S. Department of Energy Post Office Box 2008 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6269 P: (865) 576-0710 Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office Pictured Right: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office Staff OSO Staff Photo 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office (OSO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and manage the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

280

Thomas Jefferson Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Thomas Jefferson Site Office (TJSO) TJSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Thomas Jefferson Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 12000 Jefferson Avenue Newport News, VA 23606 P: (757) 269-7140 Thomas Jefferson Site Office Pictured Right: Thomas Jefferson Site Office Staff TJSO Staff Photo 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Thomas Jefferson Site Office (TJSO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and manage the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF) in Newport News, Virginia. TJNAF is one of ten Office of Science Laboratories and is a single program

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Pacific Northwest Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 Pacific Northwest Site Office Pictured Right: Pacific Northwest Site Office Staff PNSO Staff Photo 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and manage the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) External link in Richland, Washington. PNNL is one of ten Office of Science Laboratories and is a multi-program

282

Health and Productivity: A Needs Assessment Pilot at Two DOE Sites (2012)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Productivity of the Productivity of the U.S. Department of Energy FINAL REPORT Prepared by the University of Maryland with the Integrated Benefits Institute 2012 FINAL REPORT 2 Executive Summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has been concerned about employees' health and well-being for several years, especially as they relate to workplace productivity and safety. Additionally, the DOE's reliance on an aging workforce makes it even more critical for the Department to ensure that its programs and policies support employees, regardless of their age, to perform their jobs safely, while maintaining productivity, overall health, and well-

283

DOE/EA-1300: Environmental Assessment for the Nevada Test Site Development Corporation's Desert Rock Sky Park at the Nevada Test Site (03/00)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NV EA-1300 NV EA-1300 The Nevada Test Site Development Corporation's Desert Rock Sky Park at the Nevada Test Site Environmental Assessment March 2000 United States Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada Available for public sale, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: (800) 553-6847 Fax: (703) 605-6900 Email: orders@ntis.fedworld.gov Online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm Available electronically at http://www.doe.gov.bridge Available for processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contactors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62

284

EMP Attachment 2 DOE-SC PNNL Site Data Management Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Data Management Plan (DMP) describes the data management processes and activities under the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Site Environmental Monitoring Plan. The activities currently in the Plan are limited to offsite environmental surveillance of PNNL Site radiological releases to the air. The DMP provides guidance on data capture, processing and transmittal, and database configuration management. The requirements for the PNNL Site Environmental Monitoring (SEM) Database and associated records are documented in order to assure that vital data are recorded accurately, stored in a manner that retains data integrity, and are suitable for analyst to use. Protocols and procedures must ensure the data will be adequate and robust.

Bisping, Lynn E.

2011-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

285

Argonne Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Argonne Site Office (ASO) ASO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Argonne Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 9800 South Cass Avenue Building 201 Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-8637 Argonne Site Office Pictured Right: Advanced Photon Source Advanced Photon Source 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Argonne Site Office (ASO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and manage the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) in Argonne, Illinois. ANL is one of ten Office of Science Laboratories and is a multi-program laboratory with a primary mission on delivering breakthrough science and

286

Fermi Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Fermi Site Office (FSO) FSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Fermi Site Office U.S. Department of Energy MS 118 P.O. Box 2000 Kirk Road and Pine Street Batavia, IL 60510 P: (630) 840-3281 F: (630) 840-3285 Fermi Site Office Pictured Right: Fermi view to the Northeast Fermi View to Northeast 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Fermi Site Office (FSO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and manage the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) in Batavia, Illinois. FNAL is one of ten Office of Science Laboratories and is a single-program

287

SLAC Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home SLAC Site Office (SSO) SSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Contact Information SLAC Site Office U.S. Department of Energy Bldg 41, M/S 08A 2575 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 P: (650) 926-2505 SLAC Site Office Pictured Right: Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource Facility SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The SLAC Site Office (SSO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and manage the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) in Menlo Park, California. SLAC is one of ten Office of Science Laboratories and is a multi-program

288

Ames Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Ames Site Office (AMSO) AMSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Ames Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-6167 F: (630) 252-2855 Ames Site Office Pictured Right: Ames Laboratory Ames Laboratory 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Ames Site Office (AMSO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and manage the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the Ames Laboratory in Ames, Iowa. Ames Laboratory is one of ten Office of Science Laboratories and is a single program laboratory with a primary mission on delivering breakthrough science and technology in the area of Basic Energy Sciences. The AMSO is

289

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Jersey City NJ Site - NJ 07  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Jersey City NJ Site - NJ 07 Jersey City NJ Site - NJ 07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Jersey City, NJ Alternate Name(s): Kellex Laboratory Jersey City Laboratory Kellex/Pierpont Vitro Corporation of America Delco-Levco Pierpont Property M.W. Kellogg Site NJ.07-1 NJ.07-2 NJ.07-6 Location: New Jersey Route 440 and Kellogg Street, Jersey City, New Jersey NJ.07-5 Historical Operations: Conducted research and development for MED and AEC on gaseous diffusion process for uranium enrichment using uranium hexaflouride and solvent extraction process for uranium recovery from ores. Also conducted solvent extraction of uranium and other byproducts from waste. Processes resulted in contamination of uranium, radium, and thorium. NJ.07-3 NJ.07-5 Eligibility Determination: Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Survey, Verification Survey NJ.07-4

290

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Granite City IL Site - IL 28  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Granite City IL Site - IL 28 Granite City IL Site - IL 28 FUSRAP Considered Sites Granite City, IL Alternate Name(s): Granite City Steel General Steel Industries General Steel Casings Corporation New Betatron Building IL.28-3 Location: 1417 State Street, Granite City, Illinois IL.28-3 Historical Operations: Under subcontract with Mallinckrodt and using a government-owned Betatron (magnetic induction electron accelerator), x-rayed natural uranium ingots and dingots to detect metallurgical flaws. Contamination from rubbing off of oxidized uranium during handling. IL.28-3 IL.28-5 Eligibility Determination: Eligible IL.28-1 IL.28-2 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys, Verification Survey IL.28-6 IL.28-7 IL.28-8 Site Status: Certified - Certification Basis, Federal Register Notice included IL.28-9

291

2012 DOE Sustainability Awards PSO Site Title EE National Renewable Energy Laboratory Comprehensive Energy Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sustainability Awards Sustainability Awards PSO Site Title EE National Renewable Energy Laboratory Comprehensive Energy Management EM Headquarters - EM Environmental Management's Sustainability Hero EM Savannah River Site SRS - An Innovative Approach for In-Situ Detection of Mercury in Soils and Sediments EM Savannah River Site SRS Biomass Steam and Co-generation Project EM Savannah River Site SRS Moving Beyond Pump and Treat for cVOC Remediation FE National Energy Technology Laboratory Exceptional Service/Sustainability Champion FE National Energy Technology Laboratory Successful Implementation of NETL's Environmental Management System FE National Energy Technology Laboratory Water Resources LM Legacy Management Not Just Your Average EMS NA Los Alamos National Laboratory Ronnie Garcia - Master of Minimization

292

Princeton Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Princeton Site Office (PSO) PSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Contact Information Princeton Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 102 Princeton, NJ 08543 P: (609) 243-3700 F: (609) 243-2032 Princeton Site Office Pictured Right: Aerial view of Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aerial view of Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Princeton Site Office (PSO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and manage the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) in Princeton, New Jersey. PPPL is one of ten Office of Science Laboratories and is a multi-program

293

DOE/OR/20722-34 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

4 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 10 GROVE AVENUE Rochelle Park,...

294

DOE/OR/20722-41 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 38 GROVE AVENUE Rochelle Park,...

295

DOE/OR/20722-40 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

40 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 34 GROVE AVENUE Rochelle Park,...

296

DOE/OR/20722-42 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

2 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 42 GROVE AVENUE Rochelle Park,...

297

DOE/OR/20722-37 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

7 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 22 GROVE AVENUE Rochelle Park,...

298

DOE/OR/20722-83 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

3 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ON GROVE AVENUE AND PARKWAY...

299

DOE/OR/20722-39 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

39 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 30 GROVE AVENUE Rochelle Park,...

300

DOE/OR/20722-38 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

8 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 26 GROVE AVENUE Rochelle Park,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office CX Determinations Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): * Determination Date Name of Action: Description Categorical Exclusion Number External link 12/11/2013 Demolition and Replacement of Building 7018 at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (3790CXD) .pdf file (100KB) B1.15; B1.23

302

Fermi Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Fermi Site Office CX Determinations Fermi Site Office CX Determinations Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) SSI Home Facilities and Infrastructure Safeguards & Security Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Phone Listing .pdf file (129KB) SC HQ Continuity of Operations (COOP) Implementation Plan .pdf file (307KB) Categorical Exclusion Determinations SLI & SS Budget Contact Information Safety, Security and Infrastructure U.S. Department of Energy SC-31/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4097 F: (301) 903-7047 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Fermi Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): *

303

Pacific Northwest Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Pacific Northwest Site Office CX Determinations Pacific Northwest Site Office CX Determinations Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) SSI Home Facilities and Infrastructure Safeguards & Security Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Phone Listing .pdf file (129KB) SC HQ Continuity of Operations (COOP) Implementation Plan .pdf file (307KB) Categorical Exclusion Determinations SLI & SS Budget Contact Information Safety, Security and Infrastructure U.S. Department of Energy SC-31/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4097 F: (301) 903-7047 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Pacific Northwest Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): *

304

Argonne Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Argonne Site Office CX Determinations Argonne Site Office CX Determinations Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Argonne Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): * Determination Date Name of Action: Description Categorical Exclusion Number External link 12/12/2013 Operation of the 50 MeV Electron LINAC Accelerator (ASO-CX-300) .pdf file (177KB) B3.10

305

SLAC Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

SLAC Site Office CX Determinations SLAC Site Office CX Determinations Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations SLAC Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page CX Determinations prior to October 2009 should be requested from David Osugi. Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): * Determination Date Name of Action: Description Categorical Exclusion Number External link

306

Princeton Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Princeton Site Office CX Determinations Princeton Site Office CX Determinations Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Princeton Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Note: ARRA is the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Funded Projects. PSO CX Posting Statement .pdf file (73KB) Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): * Determination Date Name of Action: Description Categorical Exclusion Number External link

307

Berkeley Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Berkeley Site Office CX Determinations Berkeley Site Office CX Determinations Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) SSI Home Facilities and Infrastructure Safeguards & Security Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Phone Listing .pdf file (129KB) SC HQ Continuity of Operations (COOP) Implementation Plan .pdf file (307KB) Categorical Exclusion Determinations SLI & SS Budget Contact Information Safety, Security and Infrastructure U.S. Department of Energy SC-31/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4097 F: (301) 903-7047 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Berkeley Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): *

308

Thomas Jefferson Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Thomas Jefferson Site Office CX Thomas Jefferson Site Office CX Determinations Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Thomas Jefferson Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page As of October 31, 2010, there have been no CX determinations made. Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): * Determination Date Name of Action: Description Categorical Exclusion Number External link

309

Ames Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Ames Site Office CX Determinations Ames Site Office CX Determinations Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Ames Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): * Determination Date Name of Action: Description Categorical Exclusion Number External link 07/10/2013 Sensitive Instrument Facility .pdf file (792KB) B3.6

310

Princeton Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Princeton Site Office CX Determinations Princeton Site Office CX Determinations Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) SSI Home Facilities and Infrastructure Safeguards & Security Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Phone Listing .pdf file (129KB) SC HQ Continuity of Operations (COOP) Implementation Plan .pdf file (307KB) Categorical Exclusion Determinations SLI & SS Budget Contact Information Safety, Security and Infrastructure U.S. Department of Energy SC-31/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4097 F: (301) 903-7047 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Princeton Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Note: ARRA is the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Funded

311

Ames Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Ames Site Office CX Determinations Ames Site Office CX Determinations Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) SSI Home Facilities and Infrastructure Safeguards & Security Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Phone Listing .pdf file (129KB) SC HQ Continuity of Operations (COOP) Implementation Plan .pdf file (307KB) Categorical Exclusion Determinations SLI & SS Budget Contact Information Safety, Security and Infrastructure U.S. Department of Energy SC-31/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4097 F: (301) 903-7047 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Ames Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): *

312

Brookhaven Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Brookhaven Site Office CX Determinations Brookhaven Site Office CX Determinations Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) SSI Home Facilities and Infrastructure Safeguards & Security Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Phone Listing .pdf file (129KB) SC HQ Continuity of Operations (COOP) Implementation Plan .pdf file (307KB) Categorical Exclusion Determinations SLI & SS Budget Contact Information Safety, Security and Infrastructure U.S. Department of Energy SC-31/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4097 F: (301) 903-7047 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Brookhaven Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): *

313

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Chicago South IL Site - IL 06  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

South IL Site - IL 06 South IL Site - IL 06 FUSRAP Considered Sites Chicago South, IL Alternate Name(s): University of Chicago Charles Herbert Jones Chemical Laboratory Ryerson Physical Laboratory Eckhart Hall Kent Chemical Laboratory Ricketts Laboratory IL.06-3 Location: University of Chicago, Ellis Avenue and East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois IL.06-3 Historical Operations: Performed activities associated with (1) production and purification of plutonium, which involved the handling and processing of uranium compounds; (2) demonstrating the self-sustaining nature of the fission process and the production of Pu-239 from U-238 (nuclear fission and Chicago Pile-1); and (3) health effects (metal toxicology and radiation effects). IL.06-5 IL.06-6 IL.06-7 Eligibility Determination: Eligible IL.06-1

314

Brookhaven Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Brookhaven Site Office CX Determinations Brookhaven Site Office CX Determinations Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Brookhaven Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): * Determination Date Name of Action: Description Categorical Exclusion Number External link 04/29/2013 This generic CX covers removal and transfer of beamlines from Brookhaven National Laboratory to other federal agencies or scientific laboratories. This activity will involve disassembly of beamlines and transport via tractor trailers over public roads. .pdf file (14KB) B1.30

315

Berkeley Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Berkeley Site Office CX Determinations Berkeley Site Office CX Determinations Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Berkeley Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): * Determination Date Name of Action: Description Categorical Exclusion Number External link 09/05/2013 Joint BioEnergy Institute Lease and Operations of Greenhouses at UC Davis .pdf file (77KB) B1.24; B3.6

316

Argonne Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Argonne Site Office CX Determinations Argonne Site Office CX Determinations Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) SSI Home Facilities and Infrastructure Safeguards & Security Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Phone Listing .pdf file (129KB) SC HQ Continuity of Operations (COOP) Implementation Plan .pdf file (307KB) Categorical Exclusion Determinations SLI & SS Budget Contact Information Safety, Security and Infrastructure U.S. Department of Energy SC-31/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4097 F: (301) 903-7047 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Argonne Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): *

317

SLAC Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

SLAC Site Office CX Determinations SLAC Site Office CX Determinations Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) SSI Home Facilities and Infrastructure Safeguards & Security Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Phone Listing .pdf file (129KB) SC HQ Continuity of Operations (COOP) Implementation Plan .pdf file (307KB) Categorical Exclusion Determinations SLI & SS Budget Contact Information Safety, Security and Infrastructure U.S. Department of Energy SC-31/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4097 F: (301) 903-7047 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations SLAC Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page CX Determinations prior to October 2009 should be requested from David

318

Pacific Northwest Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Pacific Northwest Site Office CX Pacific Northwest Site Office CX Determinations Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Pacific Northwest Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): * Determination Date Name of Action: Description Categorical Exclusion Number External link 08/01/2012 CX for Routine Maintenance .pdf file (517KB) B3.3

319

Thomas Jefferson Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Thomas Jefferson Site Office CX Determinations Thomas Jefferson Site Office CX Determinations Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) SSI Home Facilities and Infrastructure Safeguards & Security Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Phone Listing .pdf file (129KB) SC HQ Continuity of Operations (COOP) Implementation Plan .pdf file (307KB) Categorical Exclusion Determinations SLI & SS Budget Contact Information Safety, Security and Infrastructure U.S. Department of Energy SC-31/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4097 F: (301) 903-7047 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Thomas Jefferson Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page As of October 31, 2010, there have been no CX determinations made.

320

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office CX Determinations | U.S. DOE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National Laboratory Site Office CX National Laboratory Site Office CX Determinations Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) SSI Home Facilities and Infrastructure Safeguards & Security Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Phone Listing .pdf file (129KB) SC HQ Continuity of Operations (COOP) Implementation Plan .pdf file (307KB) Categorical Exclusion Determinations SLI & SS Budget Contact Information Safety, Security and Infrastructure U.S. Department of Energy SC-31/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4097 F: (301) 903-7047 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office CX Determinations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Categorical Exclusion Determination Documents (CX Determinations): *

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Chicago South IL Site - IL 06  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

South IL Site - IL 06 South IL Site - IL 06 FUSRAP Considered Sites Chicago South, IL Alternate Name(s): University of Chicago Charles Herbert Jones Chemical Laboratory Ryerson Physical Laboratory Eckhart Hall Kent Chemical Laboratory Ricketts Laboratory IL.06-3 Location: University of Chicago, Ellis Avenue and East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois IL.06-3 Historical Operations: Performed activities associated with (1) production and purification of plutonium, which involved the handling and processing of uranium compounds; (2) demonstrating the self-sustaining nature of the fission process and the production of Pu-239 from U-238 (nuclear fission and Chicago Pile-1); and (3) health effects (metal toxicology and radiation effects). IL.06-5 IL.06-6 IL.06-7 Eligibility Determination: Eligible IL.06-1

322

Site Selection for DOE/JIP Gas Hydrate Drilling in the Northern Gulf of Mexico  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Studies of geologic and geophysical data from the offshore of India have revealed two geologically distinct areas with inferred gas hydrate occurrences: the passive continental margins of the Indian Peninsula and along the Andaman convergent margin. The Indian National Gas Hydrate Program (NGHP) Expedition 01 was designed to study the occurrence of gas hydrate off the Indian Peninsula and along the Andaman convergent margin with special emphasis on understanding the geologic and geochemical controls on the occurrence of gas hydrate in these two diverse settings. NGHP Expedition 01 established the presence of gas hydrates in Krishna- Godavari, Mahanadi and Andaman basins. The expedition discovered one of the richest gas hydrate accumulations yet documented (Site 10 in the Krishna-Godavari Basin), documented the thickest and deepest gas hydrate stability zone yet known (Site 17 in Andaman Sea), and established the existence of a fully-developed gas hydrate system in the Mahanadi Basin (Site 19).

Collett, T.S. (USGS); Riedel, M. (McGill Univ., Montreal, Quebec, Canada); Cochran, J.R. (Columbia Univ., Palisades, NY); Boswell, R.M.; Kumar, Pushpendra (Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., Navi Mumbai, India); Sathe, A.V. (Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., Uttaranchal, INDIA)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 98-02: DOE Enforcement Activities where Off-site Transportation Issues are also Present  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 15, 1998 December 15, 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 98-02: DOE Enforcement Activities where Off-site Transportation Issues are also Present. Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity to the Office of Enforcement and Investigation to issue clarifying guidance from time to time with respect to the processes used in its enforcement activities. Recently several questions have arisen regarding the scope of Price-Anderson enforcement when transportation issues are directly or indirectly involved in an incident. These questions can be separated into two areas,

324

DOE/EA-1313: Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Monument Valley, Arizona, Uranium Mill Tailings Site (03/22/05)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EA-1313 DOE/EA-1313 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Monument Valley, Arizona, Uranium Mill Tailings Site Final March 2005 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC01-02GJ79491 for the U.S. Department of Energy Document Number U0069700 This Page Intentionally Blank DOE Office of Legacy Management EA of Ground Water Compliance at the Monument Valley Site March 2005 Final Page iii Contents Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................

325

INNOVATIVE ALARA TOOLS AND WORK PRACTICES USED AT THE DOE HANFORD SITE  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford Nuclear Reservation occupies an area of 586 square miles in southeastern Washington state. The site was created as part of the World War II Manhattan Project to produce weapons grade plutonium. A multitude of old reactor plants, processing facilities, underground tank farms, contaminated soil and ground water remain and are part of an on-going environmental cleanup mission of the site. The Columbia River bisects Hanford, and the concern is that the river will become contaminated if the sources of contamination are not removed. Currently facilities are being removed, the ground water is being treated, and contaminated soil is being transferred to an approved burial ground about 15 miles away from the River located in the center of the Hanford Site The remaining facilities and adjacent structures are undergoing D&D (decontaminate and demolish) and to date, significant progress has been made. During this presentation, I will discuss how we are using innovative tools and work practices to D&D these Hanford Site facilities.

WAGGONER LO

2010-02-12T23:59:59.000Z

326

BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STABILITY OF PLUTONIUM RELEVANT TO LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP OF DOE SITES.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Pu is generally considered to be relatively immobile in the terrestrial environment, with the exception of transport via airborne and erosion mechanisms. More recently the transport of colloidal forms of Pu is being studied as a mobilization pathway from subsurface contaminated soils and sediments. The overall objective of this research is to understand the biogeochemical cycling of Pu in environments of interest to long-term DOE stewardship issues. Microbial processes are central to the immobilization of Pu species, through the metabolism of organically complexed Pu species and Pu associated with extracellular carrier phases and the creation of environments favorable for retardation of Pu transport.

FRANCIS, A.J.; GILLOW, J.P.; DODGE, C.J.

2006-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

327

BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STABILITY OF PLUTONIUM RELEVANT TO LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP OF DOE SITES  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Pu is generally considered to be relatively immobile in the terrestrial environment, with the exception of transport via airborne and erosion mechanisms. More recently the transport of colloidal forms of Pu is being studied as a mobilization pathway from subsurface contaminated soils and sediments. The overall objective of this research is to understand the biogeochemical cycling of Pu in environments of interest to long-term DOE stewardship issues. Microbial processes are central to the immobilization of Pu species, through the metabolism of organically complexed Pu species and Pu associated with extracellular carrier phases and the creation of environments favorable for retardation of Pu transport.

Francis, A.J.; Gillow, J.B.; Dodge, C.J.

2006-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-08)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 7, 2004 April 7, 2004 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-08) memorandum David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWL-4 TO: Proposed Action: Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project - Under the Monitoring and Evaluation Program (M&E), the coho acclimation research task would be modified to include a new site located in the upper Yakima south of Cle Elum, WA. Project No.: F3204 Location: Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Yakima Fisheries Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (YFP EIS)

329

Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

» Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory » Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) SULI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Recommender Information Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory and Research Project Applicants must identify their first and second choice laboratories indicating where they would like to do their research internship. Applicants must also select a research area(s) of interest matching one of those listed for a particular laboratory's ongoing research programs. This choice is made at the sole discretion of the applicant.

330

DOE/EV-0005/11 Formerly Utilized M.ED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1 1 Formerly Utilized M.ED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radidogical Survey of the Seneca Army Depot Romulus, New York February 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology : E 1 bOE/EV-0005/11 UC-70 Formerly Utilized MEDIAEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radidogical Survey of the Seneca Army Depot Romulus, New York February 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 Under Contract No. W-7405-ENG-26 By the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Available from: National Technical Information Service (NTIS) U.S. Department of Comrqerce

331

Seismic Hazard Characterization at the DOE Savannah River Site (SRS): Status report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Seismic Hazard Characterization project for the Savannah River Site (SRS-SHC) is to develop estimates of the seismic hazard for several locations within the SRS. Given the differences in the geology and geotechnical characteristics at each location, the estimates of the seismic hazard are to allow for the specific local conditions at each site. Characterization of seismic hazard is a critical factor for the design of new facilities as well as for the review and potential retrofit of existing facilities at SRS. The scope of the SRS seismic hazard characterization reported in this document is limited to the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA). The goal of the project is to provide seismic hazard estimates based on a state-of-the-art method which is consistent with developments and findings of several ongoing studies which are deemed to bring improvements in the state of the seismic hazard analyses.

Savy, J.B.

1994-06-24T23:59:59.000Z

332

Site Selection for DOE/JIP Gas Hydrate Drilling in the Northern Gulf of Mexico  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In the late spring of 2008, the Chevron-led Gulf of Mexico Gas Hydrate Joint Industry Project (JIP) expects to conduct an exploratory drilling and logging campaign to better understand gas hydrate-bearing sands in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. The JIP Site Selection team selected three areas to test alternative geological models and geophysical interpretations supporting the existence of potential high gas hydrate saturations in reservoir-quality sands. The three sites are near existing drill holes which provide geological and geophysical constraints in Alaminos Canyon (AC) lease block 818, Green Canyon (GC) 955, and Walker Ridge (WR) 313. At the AC818 site, gas hydrate is interpreted to occur within the Oligocene Frio volcaniclastic sand at the crest of a fold that is shallow enough to be in the hydrate stability zone. Drilling at GC955 will sample a faulted, buried Pleistocene channel-levee system in an area characterized by seafloor fluid expulsion features, structural closure associated with uplifted salt, and abundant seismic evidence for upward migration of fluids and gas into the sand-rich parts of the sedimentary section. Drilling at WR313 targets ponded sheet sands and associated channel/levee deposits within a minibasin, making this a non-structural play. The potential for gas hydrate occurrence at WR313 is supported by shingled phase reversals consistent with the transition from gas-charged sand to overlying gas-hydrate saturated sand. Drilling locations have been selected at each site to 1) test geological methods and models used to infer the occurrence of gas hydrate in sand reservoirs in different settings in the northern Gulf of Mexico; 2) calibrate geophysical models used to detect gas hydrate sands, map reservoir thicknesses, and estimate the degree of gas hydrate saturation; and 3) delineate potential locations for subsequent JIP drilling and coring operations that will collect samples for comprehensive physical property, geochemical and other analyses.

Hutchinson, D.R. (USGS); Shelander, D. (Schlumberger, Houston, TX); Dai, J. (Schlumberger, Hoston, TX); McConnell, D. (AOA Geophysics, Inc., Houston, TX); Shedd, W. (Minerals Management Service); Frye, M. (Minerals Management Service); Ruppel, C. (USGS); Boswell, R.; Jones, E. (Chevron Energy Technology Corp., Houston, TX); Collett, T.S. (USGS); Rose, K.; Dugan, B. (Rice Univ., Houston, TX); Wood, W. (U.S. Naval Research Laboratory); Latham, T. (Chevron Energy Technology Corp., Houston, TX)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

Supplement Analysis for the Storage of Surplus Plutonium Materials at the Savannah River Site (DOE/EIS-0229-SA-4)(09/05/07)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9-SA-4 9-SA-4 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS STORAGE OF SURPLUS PLUTONIUM MATERIALS AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE In April 2002, DOE decided to immediately consolidate long-term storage at the Savannah River Site (SRS) of surplus, non-pit weapons-usable plutonium then stored at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) (DOE, 2002a). That 2002 decision did not affect an earlier DOE decision made in the January 21, 1997, Record of Decision (ROD, DOE, 1997) for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Storage and Disposition PEIS, DOE, 1996) to continue storage of non-pit surplus plutonium at Hanford, the Idaho National Laboratory (INL), and the Los Alamos

334

INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE BUILDING 100 PLUME, FORMER DOE PINELLAS SITE (YOUNG - RAINEY STAR CENTER), LARGO, FLORIDA  

SciTech Connect

Contaminated groundwater associated with Building 100 at the Young-Rainey Science, Technology, and Research Center, formerly the DOE Pinellas plant, is the primary remedial challenge that remains to be addressed at the site. Currently, Building 100 is an active industrial facility that is now owned and operated by the Pinellas county government. Groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells recently installed near the southern boundary of the site suggest that contaminated groundwater has migrated off the plant site. In response to the challenges presented by the Building 100 plume, the Office of Legacy Management (LM) requested assistance from the DOE Office of Groundwater and Soil Remediation (EM-32) to provide a review team to make technical recommendations so that they can efficiently and effectively address characterization and remediation of the plume. The review team was unanimous in the conclusion that a dynamic strategy that combines a phased implementation of direct push samplers, sensors, and tools can be used to better delineate the extent of contamination, control plume migration, and rapidly remediate the contaminated groundwater at the site. The initial efforts of the team focused on reviewing the site history and data, organizing the information into a conceptual model, identifying appropriate technologies, and recommending an integrated strategy. The current groundwater data from the site indicate a two-lobed plume extending to the east and south. To the east vinyl chloride is the primary contaminant of concern, to the south, vinyl chloride and cis1, 2-DCE are the primary contaminants. The limited data that are available suggest that reductive dechlorination of the TCE is already occurring but is not sufficient to prevent offsite migration of low concentrations of TCE daughter products. The team recommends that DOE pursue a strategy that builds on the natural cleansing capacity of the subsurface with reductive methods including biostimulation and/or bioaugmentation to provide a sustainable remediation system within the flow path of the plume. Additional data will be required to implement this approach and will include: (1) Better delineation of the nature and extent of contamination; (2) Demonstration the plume is currently stable or shrinking; and (3) Demonstration the full reductive dechlorination is occurring. The technical team recommends that DOE use a phased approach to identify residual contamination and to provide rapid installation of remedies. Matrices of characterization and remediation sensors, technologies, and tools were developed by the team in order to match the specific conditions and requirements of the site. The team provides a specific example of remedy that includes the incorporation of a dynamic characterization strategy moving from minimally invasive to more aggressive field techniques, the consideration of multiple complementary remediation approaches based on a spatiotemporally phased approach keyed to the different demands of different parts of the plume, and the integration and sequencing of the characterization and remediation activities.

Eddy-Dilek, C.; Rossabi, J.; Amidon, M.; Riha, B.; Kaback, D.

2010-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

335

Sitewide soil and debris management program for a DOE site under remediation  

SciTech Connect

In 1986, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) entered into a Federal Facility Compliance Agreement (FFCA). The agreement included provisions to investigate and define the nature and extent of contamination and to determine the necessity for remediation at the Fernald Environmental Management Project (FEMP) near Cincinnati, Ohio. The agreement is also pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Uranium enrichment production activities at the facility ceased in 1989. The FEMP mission is now environmental clean-up and remediation under the management of the Fernald Environmental Restoration Management Corporation. This report describes objectives and activities of remediation efforts at FEMP.

Harvey, B.F. [Parsons Environmental Services, Inc., Fairfield, OH (United States)

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

336

Biogeochemical Cycling and Environmental Stability of Pu Relevant to Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The overall objective of this proposed research is to understand the biogeochemical cycling of Pu in environments of interest to long-term DOE stewardship issues. Central to Pu cycling (transport initiation to immobilization) is the role of microorganisms. The hypothesis underlying this proposal is that microbial activity is the causative agent in initiating the mobilization of Pu in near-surface environments: through the transformation of Pu associated with solid phases, production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) carrier phases, and the creation of microenvironments. Also, microbial processes are central to the immobilization of Pu species, through the metabolism of organically complexed Pu species and Pu associated with extracellular carrier phases and the creation of environments favorable for Pu transport retardation.

Honeyman, Bruce D.

2006-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

Biogeochemical Cycling and Environmental Stability of Pu Relevant to Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The overall objective of this proposed research is to understand the biogeochemical cycling of Pu in environments of interest to long-term DOE stewardship issues. Central to Pu cycling (transport initiation to immobilization) is the role of microorganisms. The hypothesis underlying this proposal is that microbial activity is the causative agent in initiating the mobilization of Pu in near-surface environments: through the transformation of Pu associated with solid phases, production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) carrier phases, and the creation of microenvironments. Also, microbial processes are central to the immobilization of Pu species, through the metabolism of organically complexed Pu species and Pu associated with extracellular carrier phases and the creation of environments favorable for Pu transport retardation.

Francis, Arokiasamy J.; Santschi, Peter H.; Honeyman, Bruce D.

2005-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

Biogeochemical Cycling and Environmental Stability of Pu Relevant to Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The overall objective of this research is to understand the biogeochemical cycling of Pu in environments of interest to long-term DOE stewardship issues. Central to Pu cycling (transport initiation and immobilization) is the role of microorganisms. The hypothesis underlying this work is that microbial activity is the causative agent in initiating the mobilization of Pu in near-surface environments: through the transformation of Pu associated with solid phases, production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) carrier phases and the creation of microenvironments. Also, microbial processes are central to the immobilization of Pu species, through the metabolism of organically complexed Pu species and Pu associated with extracellular carrier phases and the creation of environments favorable for Pu transport retardation.

Honeyman, Bruce D.; Francis, A.J.; Gillow, Jeffrey B.; Dodge, Cleveland J.; Santschi, Peter H.; Chin-Chang Hung; Diaz, Angelique; Tinnacher, Ruth; Roberts, Kimberly; Schwehr, Kathy

2006-04-05T23:59:59.000Z

339

DOE/KEURP Site Operator Program year 5 first quarter report, July 1-- September 30, 1995  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Kansas State University, with funding support from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the Department of Energy` s Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Through participation in this program, Kansas State is displaying, testing, and evaluating electric or hybrid vehicle technology. This participation will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU now has two electric cars. Both are electric conversion vehicles from Soleq Corporation out of Chicago. KSU in conjunction with KEURP also initiated procurement for the purchase of four (4) Chevy S-10 pickup trucks. Since the supplier, GE-Spartan, canceled its effort concerning the production of vehicles other appropriate sources were sought. Today, K-State and the Kansas Utilities are working with Troy Design and Manufacturing (TDM), Redford, Michigan. TDM is working with Ford Motor Company and expects to become the first certified electric vehicle Quality Vehicle Modifier (QVM). Kansas State has entered into an agreement to assist TDM in supporting the infrastructure and technical manual development for these vehicles. The Soleq EVcorts have not been signed to illustrate to the public that it is an electric vehicle. Magnetic signs have been made for special functions to ensure sponsor support is recognized and acknowledged. As soon as TDM`s Ford Ranger electric vehicles are delivered they will be used throughout the state by utility companies that are participating with K-State`s Site Operator Program.

NONE

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

How to Apply How to Apply » Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Community College Internships (CCI) CCI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Recommender Information Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory and Research Project: Applicants must identify their first and second choice laboratories indicating where they would like to do their technical training internship. Applicants must also select a technical topic area(s) of interest matching one of those listed for a particular laboratory's ongoing research programs. This choice is made at the sole discretion of the applicant.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

DOE/KEURP site operator program. Year 3, Second Quarter Report, October 1--December 31, 1993  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Kansas State University, with funding support from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the Department of Energy`s Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Through participation in this program, Kansas State is displaying, testing, and evaluating electric or hybrid vehicle technology. This participation will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU has purchased several electric cars and proposes to purchase additional electric vehicles. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has procured two (2) Soleq 1993 Ford EVcort station wagons. During calendar year 1994, the Kansas` electric vehicle program expects to purchase a minimum of four and a maximum of eleven additional electric vehicles. The G-Van was signed in order for the public to be aware that it was an electric vehicle. Financial participants` names have been stenciled on the back door of the van. The Soleq EvCorts have not been signed. In order to demonstrate the technology as feasible, the EvCorts were deliberately not signed. The goal is to generate a public perception that this vehicle is no different from any similar internal combustion engine vehicle. Magnetic signs have been made for special functions to ensure sponsor support is recognized and acknowledged.

Not Available

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

342

DOE management of high-level waste at the Hanford Site  

SciTech Connect

Approximately 60 million gallons of high-level radioactive waste--caustic liquids, slurries, saltcakes, and sludges--are stored in underground tanks at the Department of Energy`s Hanford Site. At least one-third of the tanks are known to have leaked waste into the enviroranent, and there are many unresolved tank safety issues. In order to resolve the environmental and safety concerns, the Department plans to retrieve the waste, immobilize it, and dispose of it in a permanent geologic repository. Processing all of the tank waste in this manner could cost $40 billion, including $1.2 billion to construct the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant. The purpose of our audit was to examine the reasons for cost estimate increases and schedule delays on the Hanford vitrification program. We also wanted to report on outstanding technical, safety, and environmental issues that could make the project even more costly and further delay its completion. We found that the Department managed the Hanford remediation system as a number of separate projects not fully integrated into one major system acquisition. Total costs have, therefore, been obscured, and the Department has not yet clearly defined system requirements or developed overall cost and schedule baselines. This lack of visibility could result in additional cost growth and schedule delays. We also noted a vast array of technical uncertainties, including tank safety and inadequate information about the makeup of tank waste, that could significantly affect the program`s cost and ultimate success. To increase visibility of program cost and schedule, we are recommending that all separate projects relating to tank waste be included in a single major system acquisition, and that the Department complete its ongoing baselining effort to the extent practical before making major funding commitments. Management concurred with our finding and recommendations.

Not Available

1993-04-14T23:59:59.000Z

343

DOE/EA-1312: Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site (Climax Uranium Millsite) (September 1999)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site (Climax Uranium Millsite) Final September 1999 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-96GJ87335 for the U.S. Department of Energy EA of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site DOE Grand Junction Office Page ii Final September 1999 Contents Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction...............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site Location and Description.........................................1

344

Processing capabilties for the elimination of contaminated metal scrapyards at DOE/ORO-managed sites. [Metal smelting facility  

SciTech Connect

Capabilities exist for reducing all the contaminated nickel, aluminum, and copper scrap to ingot form by smelting. Processing these metals at existing facilities could be completed in about 5 or 6 years. However, these metals represent only about 20% of the total metal inventories currently on hand at the DOE/ORO-managed sites. No provisions have been made for the ferrous scrap. Most of the ferrous scrap is unclassified and does not require secured storage. Also, the potential resale value of the ferrous scrap at about $100 per ton is very low in comparison. Consequently, this scrap has been allowed to accumulate. With several modifications and equipment additions, the induction melter at PGDP could begin processing ferrous scrap after its commitment to nickel and aluminum. The PGDP smelter is a retrofit installation, and annual throughput capabilities are limited. Processing of the existing ferrous scrap inventories would not be completed until the FY 1995-2000 time frame. An alternative proposal has been the installation of induction melters at the other two enrichment facilities. Conceptual design of a generic metal smelting facility is under way. The design study includes capital and operating costs for scrap preparation through ingot storage at an annual throughput of 10,000 tons per year. Facility design includes an induction melter with the capability of melting both ferrous and nonferrous metals. After three years of operation with scrapyard feed, the smelter would have excess capacity to support on-site decontamination and decomissioning projects or upgrading programs. The metal smelting facility has been proposed for FY 1984 line item funding with start-up operations in FY 1986.

Mack, J.E.; Williams, L.C.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

345

Recommender Information | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Recommender Information Recommender Information Community College Internships (CCI) CCI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Recommender Information Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Recommender Information Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page For Recommenders A completed CCI application requires letters of recommendation from two individuals familiar with the applicant's education, training, experience, aptitude, or promise relevant to the CCI Program. An applicant will be asked to provide contact information for the indicated individuals in the online application system. Applicants are encouraged to make the requests for recommendations as soon as possible.

346

Spectroelectrochemical Sensor for Pertechnetate Applicable to Hanford and Other DOE Sites  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

New film materials for pertechnetate: A new film material comprised of quaternized poly(4-vinylpyridine) cross-linked with 1,10-diiododecane has been developed for use in the spectroelectrochemical sensor. Films were prepared in a one-pot synthesis by stirring poly(4-vinylpyridine), cross-linker and methyl iodide in 1-butanol for 1 h, after which the solution was spin-coating onto ITO-glass. Film thickness was varied either by changing the spin rate or by dilution of the original precursor solution. The thinnest film prepared was 30 nm; the thickest 930 nm. Spectroscopic ellipsometry was used to study the dynamics of film changes on soaking in aqueous salt solution and on preconcentrating model analyte ferrocyanide. The results document that, on hydration, films expanded by almost 90% in 0.1 M KNO3, then contracted slightly when ferrocyanide solution was introduced probably due to electrostatic cross-linking. IR spectroscopy was used to determine the extent of quaternization of the film. For a polymer solution stirred for 1 h, films were about 20% quaternized. This can be increased to {approx}30% by adding more solvent to the precursor solution and stirring for an additional hour. Solubility of the partially cross-linked material was a factor that limited the quaternization process. Use of a more appropriate solvent may enable greater quaternization. A more quaternized film should preconcentrate more pertechnetate by virtue of having a higher density of charged binding sites. Film ruggedness is critical. To investigate this, films on ITO-glass were soaked in methanol and butanol overnight, in 0.1M KNO3, and in 0.1M KNO3 adjusted to pH 12 and pH 2 for 30 days. Each film was then tested as a spectroelectrochemical sensor for model analyte ferrocyanide. The results showed only the pH 2 conditioned sensor behaved abnormally. The film soaked in pH 2 electrolyte delaminated but did not dissolve. Delamination was most likely due to the acid digestion of the ITO layer of the sensor and not to any film-based process. We have also shown that it is possible to regenerate the film by flushing with 1M KNO3 solution. Response curves were prepared from a single sensor by injecting different concentrations of ferrocyanide, monitoring the uptake, then regenerating the film and injecting the next concentration. To check reproducibility, a film was regenerated 10 times with almost no change in response. Film selectivity was demonstrated by adding a model cationic species, Ru(bipy)32+ to the ferrocyanide sample. Even at 10 times the ferrocyanide concentration, only a very small electrochemical signal and no optical signal due to the cation were observed. Additionally a competitive anion Ru(CN)64- could be distinguished from Fe(CN)64- based on the redox potential and absorbance spectrum differences between the two anions. Both species were preconcentrated into the film, and both could be electrochemically modulated simultaneously or individually. The films exhibited a linear absorbance response to ferrocyanide over the range 0.008-0.2mM. From 0.1mM ferrocyanide solution, the analyte was concentrated in a 320 nm thick film by a factor of {approx}6,000. The films have recently been used at PNNL to repeat cyclic voltammetry experiments with pertechnetate (TcO4) as previously performed with other candidate films. The results showed that the new films performed very well and better than films previously used, and showed reversible waves in the voltammogram with the film present where none appeared when a bare ITO-glass substrate was used. Our results clearly show that cross-linked quaternized poly(4-vinylpyridine) films made this way are superior materials for preconcentrating pertechnetate.

Heineman, William R.

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

THE DEACTIVATION DECONTAMINATION & DECOMMISSIONING OF THE PLUTONIUM FINISHING PLANT (PFP) A FORMER PLUTONIUM PROCESSING FACILITY AT DOE HANFORD SITE  

SciTech Connect

The Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) was constructed as part of the Manhattan Project during World War II. The Manhattan Project was developed to usher in the use of nuclear weapons to end the war. The primary mission of the PFP was to provide plutonium used as special nuclear material (SNM) for fabrication of nuclear devices for the war effort. Subsequent to the end of World War II, the PFP's mission expanded to support the Cold War effort through plutonium production during the nuclear arms race and later the processing of fuel grade mixed plutonium-uranium oxide to support DOE's breeder reactor program. In October 1990, at the close of the production mission for PFP, a shutdown order was prepared by the Department of Energy (DOE) in Washington, DC and issued to the Richland DOE field office. Subsequent to the shutdown order, a team from the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) analyzed the hazards at PFP associated with the continued storage of certain forms of plutonium solutions and solids. The assessment identified many discrete actions that were required to stabilize the different plutonium forms into stable form and repackage the material in high integrity containers. These actions were technically complicated and completed as part of the PFP nuclear material stabilization project between 1995 and early 2005. The completion of the stabilization project was a necessary first step in deactivating PFP. During stabilization, DOE entered into negotiations with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Washington and established milestones for the Deactivation and Decommissioning (D&D) of the PFP. The DOE and its contractor, Fluor Hanford (Fluor), have made great progress in deactivating, decontaminating and decommissioning the PFP at the Hanford Site as detailed in this paper. Background information covering the PFP D&D effort includes descriptions of negotiations with the State of Washington concerning consent-order milestones, milestones completed to date, and the vision of bringing PFP to slab-on-grade. Innovative approaches in planning and regulatory strategies, as well new technologies from within the United States and from other countries and field decontamination techniques developed by workforce personnel, such as the ''turkey roaster'' and the ''lazy Susan'' are covered in detail in the paper. Critical information on issues and opportunities during the performance of the work such as concerns regarding the handling and storage of special nuclear material, concerns regarding criticality safety and the impact of SNM de-inventory at PFP are also provided. The continued success of the PFP D&D effort is due to the detailed, yet flexible, approach to planning that applied innovative techniques and tools, involved a team of experienced independent reviewers, and incorporated previous lessons learned at the Hanford site, Rocky Flats, and commercial nuclear D&D projects. Multi-disciplined worker involvement in the planning and the execution of the work has produced a committed workforce that has developed innovative techniques, resulting in safer and more efficient work evolutions.

CHARBONEAU, S.L.

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

THE DEACTIVATION DECONTAMINATION & DECOMMISSIONING OF THE PLUTONIUM FINISHING PLANT (PFP) A FORMER PLUTONIUM PROCESSING FACILITY AT DOE HANFORD SITE  

SciTech Connect

The Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) was constructed as part of the Manhattan Project during World War II. The Manhattan Project was developed to usher in the use of nuclear weapons to end the war. The primary mission of the PFP was to provide plutonium used as special nuclear material (SNM) for fabrication of nuclear devices for the war effort. Subsequent to the end of World War II, the PFP's mission expanded to support the Cold War effort through plutonium production during the nuclear arms race and later the processing of fuel grade mixed plutonium-uranium oxide to support DOE's breeder reactor program. In October 1990, at the close of the production mission for PFP, a shutdown order was prepared by the Department of Energy (DOE) in Washington, DC and issued to the Richland DOE field office. Subsequent to the shutdown order, a team from the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) analyzed the hazards at PFP associated with the continued storage of certain forms of plutonium solutions and solids. The assessment identified many discrete actions that were required to stabilize the different plutonium forms into stable form and repackage the material in high integrity containers. These actions were technically complicated and completed as part of the PFP nuclear material stabilization project between 1995 and early 2005. The completion of the stabilization project was a necessary first step in deactivating PFP. During stabilization, DOE entered into negotiations with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Washington and established milestones for the Deactivation and Decommissioning (D&D) of the PFP. The DOE and its contractor, Fluor Hanford (Fluor), have made great progress in deactivating, decontaminating and decommissioning the PFP at the Hanford Site as detailed in this paper. Background information covering the PFP D&D effort includes descriptions of negotiations with the State of Washington concerning consent-order milestones, milestones completed to date, and the vision of bringing PFP to slab-on-grade. Innovative approaches in planning and regulatory strategies, as well new technologies from within the United States and from other countries and field decontamination techniques developed by workforce personnel, such as the ''turkey roaster'' and the ''lazy Susan'' are covered in detail in the paper. Critical information on issues and opportunities during the performance of the work such as concerns regarding the handling and storage of special nuclear material, concerns regarding criticality safety and the impact of SNM de-inventory at PFP are also provided. The continued success of the PFP D&D effort is due to the detailed, yet flexible, approach to planning that applied innovative techniques and tools, involved a team of experienced independent reviewers, and incorporated previous lessons learned at the Hanford site, Rocky Flats, and commercial nuclear D&D projects. Multi-disciplined worker involvement in the planning and the execution of the work has produced a committed workforce that has developed innovative techniques, resulting in safer and more efficient work evolutions.

CHARBONEAU, S.L.

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

Characterization of uranium contaminated soils from DOE Fernald Environmental Management Project Site: Results of Phase 1 characterization  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Integrated Demonstration (ID) for remediation of uranium- contaminated soils has been established by the DOE Office of Technology Development. The Fernald (Feed Materials Production Center) site was selected as the DOE facility for the field demonstration. The principle objective of this ID is to evaluate and compare the versatility, efficiency, and economics of various technologies that may be combined into systems for the removal of uranium from contaminated soils. Several leaching solutions were employed to determine their effectiveness in extracting uranium from the soil. The extractants and their means of preparation were: 0.1 N nitric acid [HNO{sub 3}]: 6.25 mL of concentrated nitric acid was diluted to 1 L with distilled water; 2% ammonium carbonate [(NH{sub 4}){sub 2}CO{sub 3}]: 20 g of (NH{sub 4}){sub 2}CO{sub 3} was dissolved in distilled water and diluted to 1 L; 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl): 50 mL of NaOCl reagent (Cl HCl) in 0.01 N nitric acid: 6.95 g (NH{sub 2}OH{center_dot}HCl) was dissolved and diluted to 1 L with 0.01 N HNO{sub 3}. The 0.01 N nitric acid was prepared by diluting 3 mL concentrated nitric acid to 5 L with distilled water; and the sodium citrate-bicarbonate-dithionite (CBD) method: 0.3 M sodium citrate (88 g tribasic sodium citrate, Na{sub 3}C{sub 6}H{sub 5}O{sub 7}{center_dot}2H{sub 2}O, per liter); 1 M sodium bicarbonate (84 g NaHCO{sub 3} per liter); and 5 g sodium dithionite, Na{sub 2}S{sub 2}O{sub 4}.

Lee, S.Y.; Marsh, J.D. Jr.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

350

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities, June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pantex Site Office's Compliance with Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Assessment Methodologies and Approach ........................................................................................... 1

351

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities, June 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Pantex Site Office's Compliance with Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Assessment Methodologies and Approach ........................................................................................... 1

352

How to Apply | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

How to Apply How to Apply Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Developing a Research Proposal Recommender Information Student Participants Submitting a Proposal to DOE Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Application Requirements All Applications to the VFP program must be completed through the online application system. The Faculty Application requirements include: 1. Completion of all required fields in the applications, including: Contact and Academic Information Citizenship status Optional Student Participation Research Proposal Essays Student Participation - Optional

353

DOE invites public to mercury storage environmental impact statement...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CO; DOE Hanford Site, Richland, WA; DOE Idaho site, Idaho Falls, ID; DOE Kansas City Plant, Kansas City, MO; DOE Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC; Hawthorne Army Depot,...

354

Characterization of uranium contaminated soils from DOE Fernald Environmental Management Project Site: Results of Phase 1 characterization  

SciTech Connect

The Integrated Demonstration (ID) for remediation of uranium- contaminated soils has been established by the DOE Office of Technology Development. The Fernald (Feed Materials Production Center) site was selected as the DOE facility for the field demonstration. The principle objective of this ID is to evaluate and compare the versatility, efficiency, and economics of various technologies that may be combined into systems for the removal of uranium from contaminated soils. Several leaching solutions were employed to determine their effectiveness in extracting uranium from the soil. The extractants and their means of preparation were: 0.1 N nitric acid [HNO{sub 3}]: 6.25 mL of concentrated nitric acid was diluted to 1 L with distilled water; 2% ammonium carbonate [(NH{sub 4}){sub 2}CO{sub 3}]: 20 g of (NH{sub 4}){sub 2}CO{sub 3} was dissolved in distilled water and diluted to 1 L; 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl): 50 mL of NaOCl reagent (Cl < 6%) was diluted to 1 L with distilled water; 0.1 M ethylenediaminetetraacetric acid, disodium salt (EDTA): 37.224 g EDTA was dissolved in distilled water and diluted to 1 L; 2% citric acid monohydrate solution (H{sub 3}C{sub 6}H{sub 5}O{sub 7}{center_dot}H{sub 2}O): 20 g of critic acid was diluted to 1 L with distilled water; 0.1 M hydroxylamine-hydrochloride (NH{sub 2}OH{center_dot}HCl) in 0.01 N nitric acid: 6.95 g (NH{sub 2}OH{center_dot}HCl) was dissolved and diluted to 1 L with 0.01 N HNO{sub 3}. The 0.01 N nitric acid was prepared by diluting 3 mL concentrated nitric acid to 5 L with distilled water; and the sodium citrate-bicarbonate-dithionite (CBD) method: 0.3 M sodium citrate (88 g tribasic sodium citrate, Na{sub 3}C{sub 6}H{sub 5}O{sub 7}{center_dot}2H{sub 2}O, per liter); 1 M sodium bicarbonate (84 g NaHCO{sub 3} per liter); and 5 g sodium dithionite, Na{sub 2}S{sub 2}O{sub 4}.

Lee, S.Y.; Marsh, J.D. Jr.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

355

DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic Telecommunication Capacity in Benton County- Upgrade improves communications at Hanford Site, schools and libraries  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

RICHLAND, Wash. ? The Department of Energy (DOE), city of Richland, and Benton Countys Public Utility District (Benton PUD) jointly implemented a high-capacity fiber optic cable in Richland and at the Hanford Site. The project will improve communications throughout the area.

356

Performance evaluation of the technical capabilities of DOE sites for disposal of mixed low-level waste: Volume 3, Site evaluations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A team of analysts designed and conducted a performance evaluation to estimate the technical capabilities of fifteen Department of Energy sites for disposal of mixed low-level waste (i.e., waste that contains both low-level radioactive materials and hazardous constituents). Volume 1 summarizes the process for selecting the fifteen sites, the methodology used in the evaluation, and the conclusions derived from the evaluation. Volume 2 provides details about the site-selection process, the performance-evaluation methodology, and the overall results of the analysis. Volume 3 contains detailed evaluations of the fifteen sites and discussion of the results for each site.

Waters, R.D.; Gruebel, M.M. [eds.] [eds.

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

357

DOE/EA-1605: Finding of No Significant Impact for the Environmental Assessment for Biomass Cogeneration and Heating Facilities at the Savannah River Site (August 2008)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Biomass Cogeneration and Heating Facilities at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Action: Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1605) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed construction and operation of new biomass cogeneration and heating facilities located at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The draft EA was made available to the States of South Carolina and Georgia, and to the public, for a 30-day comment period. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the

358

DOE/EA-1660: Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Land's Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, WA (07/20/09)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2009 July 2009 DOE/EA-1660F Environmental Assessment Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 Final Environmental Assessment July 2009 Sum-1 Summary Introduction. This Environmental Assessment (EA) provides information and analyses of proposed U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) activities associated with consolidating existing communications operations and removing excess facilities and infrastructure within the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve (ALE) at the Hanford Site near the City of Richland, Washington. Purpose and Need. To meet long-term federal agency missions, DOE needs to reduce indirect costs and

359

DOE/EA-0826: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for the Natural Resource Management Activities at the Savannah River Site (04/22/05)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact for the Natural Resource Management Activities at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Action: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Operations Office (SR) prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-0826) in 1993 to analyze the potential environmental impacts of continued management of natural resources at the Savannah River Site (SRS) located near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE-SR determined that the proposed action was not a major Federal action significantly affecting the human environment within the meaning of NEPA, and for that reason issued a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) dated July 15, 1993. The proposed action in that EA was based upon

360

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - First Place Winners | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

First Place Winners First Place Winners National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - First Place Winners Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page First Lady Michelle Obama and Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Dr. Mario Livia | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Dr. Mario Livia Dr. Mario Livia National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Dr. Mario Livia Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Dr. Mario Livia at the National Science Bowl. Photograph by Dennis Brack, National Science Bowl

362

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Smith Middle School | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Smith Middle School Smith Middle School National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Smith Middle School Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Smith Middle School team members from Glastonbury, CT visit a variety of

363

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Onate High School | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Onate High School Onate High School National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Onate High School Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Onate High School team from Las Cruces, NM stands before the Apollo

364

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Albuquerque Academy | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Albuquerque Academy Albuquerque Academy National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Albuquerque Academy Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Albuquerque Academy team member Ben Zolyomi competes at the National

365

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Albuquerque Academy | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Academy Academy National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Albuquerque Academy Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page First Lady Michelle Obama and Secretary of The Department of Energy Steven

366

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Albuquerque Academy | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Albuquerque Academy Albuquerque Academy National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Albuquerque Academy Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Two of the Albuquerque Academy Team members preparing their car as they

367

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Albuqureque Academy | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Albuqureque Academy Albuqureque Academy National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Albuqureque Academy Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Albuquerque Academy Team as they compete at the National Science Bowl

368

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Shasta High School | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Shasta High School Shasta High School National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Shasta High School Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Shasta High School team, from Redding, CA, at work on a challenge at

369

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Campbell High School | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Campbell High School Campbell High School National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Campbell High School Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Campbell High School team members, from Gillette, WY, work on a challenge

370

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Basis Charter School | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Basis Charter School Basis Charter School National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - Basis Charter School Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The BASIS Charter School Science Bowl team from Scottsdale, AZ explores the

371

Progress in evaluation of radionuclide geochemical information developed by DOE high-level nuclear waste repository site projects: report for January-March 1985. Volume 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Geochemical information relevant to the retention of radionuclides by the Hanford Site (in basalt) and the Yucca Mountain site (in tuff), candidate high-level nuclear waste geologic repositories being developed by US Department of Energy (DOE) projects, is being evaluated by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Our evaluation of the sorption of technetium by basalt/groundwater systems was essentially completed this quarter and the results summarized; we conclude that the experimental methodology and results reported by the DOE for the Hanford Site have not conclusively established that significant retardation of technetium migration may be provided by phases present in the basalts of the Hanford Site. We have shown that sodium boltwoodite is the saturating uranium solid phase in two basalt/groundwater systems. Because thermodynamic data are not available for sodium boltwoodite, calculated solubilities for uranium are erroneous in these systems. Results of radionuclide solubility/speciation calculations, published by the DOE for the Yucca Mountain site, were evaluated this quarter under our geochemical modeling task. We express concerns relative to the inherent limitations of such calculations. Samples of Yucca Mountain tuff and J-13 well water were received for use in our planned radionuclide sorption/solubility experiments. These Yucca Mountain materials will be used to evaluate radionuclide sorption and apparent concentration limit values published by the Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations (NNWSI) project. 40 refs., 5 figs., 16 tabs.

Kelmers, A.D.; Seeley, F.G.; Arnold, W.D.; Blencoe, J.G.; Meyer, R.E.; Jacobs, G.K.; Whatley, S.K.

1985-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

Record of Decision for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site (DOE/EIS-0360) (07/20/04)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

49 49 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Notices halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make recommendations to DOE in the areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities. Tentative Agenda 8 a.m.-Introductions, overview of meeting agenda and logistics (Dave Mosby) 8:15 a.m.-Past year evaluation-Board and stakeholder survey results, what worked, what can be improved (Facilitator) 9:50 a.m.-Break 10:05 a.m.-Past year evaluation continued 10:45 a.m.-Summaries and Q&A on the most important issues to DOE, TN Department of Environment & Conservation, and EPA (Facilitator) 11:30 a.m.-Lunch

373

DOE P 434.1A, Conduct and Approval of Select Agent and Toxin Work at Department of Energy Sites  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The policy establishes expectations for the operating DOE research laboratories utilizing select agents and toxins (as regulated by the United States ...

2013-11-07T23:59:59.000Z

374

DOE P 434.1, Conduct and Approval of Select Agent and Toxin Work at Department of Energy Sites  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The purpose of this policy is to establish the Departments expectations for the establishment and operation of DOE research laboratories utilizing select ...

2009-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

375

DOE Announces Additional Tour Seats Available: Tours of B Reactor at the Hanford Site Begin and End in Richland, Wash.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

RICHLAND, Wash. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has made additional seats available for tours of the B Reactor National Historic Landmark this July and August.

376

Rate of Contamination Removal of Two Phyto-remediation Sites at the DOE Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant  

SciTech Connect

This paper describes applications of phyto-remediation at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS), a Department of Energy (DOE) Facility that enriched uranium from the early 1950's until 2000. Phyto-remediation has been implemented to assist in the removal of TCE (trichloroethylene) in the groundwater at two locations at the PORTS facility: the X-740 area and the X-749/X-120 area. Phyto-remediation technology is based on the ability of certain plants species (in this case hybrid poplar trees) and their associated rhizo-spheric microorganisms to remove, degrade, or contain chemical contaminants located in the soil, sediment, surface water, groundwater, and possibly even the atmosphere. Phyto-remediation technology is a promising clean-up solution for a wide variety of pollutants and sites. Mature trees, such as the hybrid poplar, can consume up to 3,000 gallons of groundwater per acre per day. Organic compounds are captured in the trees' root systems. These organic compounds are degraded by ultraviolet light as they are transpired along with the water vapor through the leaves of the trees. The phyto-remediation system at the X-740 area encompasses 766 one-year old hybrid poplar trees (Populus nigra x nigra, Populus nigra x maximowiczii, and Populus deltoides x nigra) that were planted 10 feet apart in rows 10 feet to 20 feet apart, over an area of 2.6 acres. The system was installed to manage the VOC contaminant plume. At the X749/X-120 area, a phyto-remediation system of 2,640 hybrid poplar trees (Populus nigra x maximowiczii) was planted in seven areas/zones to manage the VOC contaminant plume. The objectives of these systems are to remove contamination from the groundwater and to prevent further migration of contaminants. The goal of these remediation procedures is to achieve completely mature and functional phyto-remediation systems within two years of the initial planting of the hybrid poplar trees at each planting location. There is a direct relationship between plant transpiration, soil moisture, and groundwater flow in a phyto-remediation system. The existing monitoring program was expanded in 2004 in order to evaluate the interactions among these processes. The purpose of this monitoring program was to determine the rate of contaminant removal and to more accurately predict the amount of time needed to remediate the contaminated groundwater. Initial planting occurred in 1999 at the X-740 area, with additional replanting in 2001 and 2002. In 2003, coring of selected trees and chemical analyses illustrated the presence of TCE; however, little impact was observed in groundwater levels, analytical monitoring, and periodic tree diameter monitoring at the X-740 area. To provide better understanding of how these phyto-remediation systems work, a portable weather station was installed at the X-740 area to provide data for estimating transpiration and two different systems for measuring sap flow and sap velocity were outfitted to numerous trees. After evaluating and refining the groundwater flow and contaminant transport models, the data gathered by these two inventive methods can be used to establish a rate of contaminant removal and to better predict the time required in order to meet remediation goals for the phyto-remediation systems located at the PORTS site. (authors)

Lewis, A.C.; Baird, D.R. [CDM Federal Services, P.O. Box 789, Piketon, OH 45661 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

Report on Inspection of Compliance With DOE Order 2030.4B at the Savannah River Site, INS-9702  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher,hr.doe.gov Depart of Energy Headquarters Anonymous FTP vm 1.hqadmin.doe.gov U.S. Department of Energy Human Resources and Administration Home Page http://www.hr.doe.gov/ig Your comments would be appreciated and can be provided on the Customer Response Form attached to the report. This report can be obtained from the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

378

DOE/EA-1538; Environmental Assessment for the Safeguards and Security Upgrades for the Storage of Plutonium Materials at the Savannah River Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 December 2005 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY UPGRADES FOR STORAGE OF PLUTONIUM MATERIALS AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE DOE/EA-1538 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY UPGRADES FOR STORAGE OF PLUTONIUM MATERIALS AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE December 2005 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE ii This page is intentionally left blank iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purpose and Need for Action 3 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES 3 2.1 Proposed Action 3 2.1.1 Modified Storage Capability within K Area for

379

DOE to Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Surplus Plutonium Disposition at the Savannah River Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) this week sent to the Federal Register a notice announcing that it will evaluate the potential environmental impacts of proposed plutonium...

380

Notice of Extension of Scoping Period for the Notice of Intent to Prepare a Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0378) (01/06/06)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

27 Federal Register 27 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2006 / Notices Dated: December 23, 2005. John Engbring, Acting Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Philip T. Feir, Lieutenant Colonel, Commanding, San Francisco District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. [FR Doc. 06-102 Filed 1-5-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3710-19-M DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Nuclear Security Administration Extension of Scoping Period for the Notice of Intent To Prepare a Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement AGENCY: National Nuclear Security Administration, DOE. SUMMARY: The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), an agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is extending the scoping period for the Site-Wide Environmental

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

How to Apply | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Community College Internships (CCI) CCI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Recommender Information Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Application Requirements All Applications to the CCI program must be completed through the online application system. The Application requirements include: 1. Completion of all required fields in the applications, including: Contact and Education Information Citizenship Status Laboratory choice and technical interests Essays 2. Undergraduate transcripts, submitted online 3. Two letters of Recommendation, submitted online The online application system will guide applicants through the

382

How to Apply | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

How to Apply How to Apply Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) SULI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Recommender Information Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Application Requirements All Applications to the SULI program must be completed through the online application system. The Application requirements include: 1. Completion of all required fields in the applications, including: Contact and Education Information Citizenship Status Laboratory choice and research interests Essays 2. Undergraduate transcripts, submitted online 3. Two letters of Recommendation, submitted online

383

Proceedings of the tenth annual DOE low-level waste management conference: Session 2: Site performance assessment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document contains twelve papers on various aspects of low-level radioactive waste management. Topics of this volume include: performance assessment methodology; remedial action alternatives; site selection and site characterization procedures; intruder scenarios; sensitivity analysis procedures; mathematical models for mixed waste environmental transport; and risk assessment methodology. Individual papers were processed separately for the database. (TEM)

Not Available

1988-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

DOE/EA-1331: Environmental Assessment for Remediation of Subsurface and Groundwater Contamination at the Rock Springs In Situ Oil Shale Retort Site (07/31/00)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31 31 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REMEDIATION OF SUBSURFACE AND GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION AT THE ROCK SPRINGS IN SITU OIL SHALE RETORT SITE SWEETWATER COUNTY, WYOMING July 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REMEDIATION OF SUBSURFACE AND GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION AT THE ROCK SPRINGS IN SITU OIL SHALE RETORT SITE SWEETWATER COUNTY, WYOMING July 2000 Prepared by: U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory NEPA COMPLIANCE SUMMARY SHEET LEAD AGENCY U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE Environmental Assessment for Remediation of Subsurface and Groundwater Contamination at the Rock Springs In Situ Oil Shale Retort Test Site; Sweetwater County Wyoming. CONTACT Additional copies or information concerning the Environmental Assessment (EA) can

385

DOE Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

386

DOE Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

772 772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

387

Participant Obligations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Participant Participant Obligations Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Participant Obligations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Visiting Faculty Program is intended to support the professional development of current faculty members who have the desire to increase the competitiveness of their own independent research at their home institution through scientific research collaborations with DOE laboratory scientists. Before the application submission deadline, all faculty applicants must submit a research project proposal that is co-developed with the research staff located at the host DOE laboratory. The VFP research proposal guidelines can be found at VFP Research

388

Recommender Information | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Recommender Information Recommender Information Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Developing a Research Proposal Recommender Information Student Participants Submitting a Proposal to DOE Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Recommender Information Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page For Recommenders A completed VFP application requires letters of recommendation from two individuals familiar with the applicant's education, training, experience, aptitude, or promise relevant to the Visiting Faculty Program. An applicant will be asked to provide contact information for the indicated individuals in the online application system. Applicants are

389

Key Dates | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Key Dates Key Dates Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Key Dates Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page At the submission deadline (shown in red) the application system will close, and no materials will be accepted after the submission deadline has passed. The Application System closes at 5:00 PM Eastern Time. VFP Term: Summer 2014 On-line Application Opens October 18, 2013 Applications Due January 10, 2014 5:00 PM ET* Offer Notification Period Begins January 20, 2014 All DOE Offers and Notifications Complete April 1, 2014 *A research proposal co-developed with a DOE laboratory researcher must be electronically submitted by all faculty applicants as part of their

390

Student Participants | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Student Participants Student Participants Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Developing a Research Proposal Recommender Information Student Participants Submitting a Proposal to DOE Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Student Participants Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Student participation in the Visiting Faculty Program is optional. Students may be undergraduates or graduate students only from the faculty member's academic institution. Faculty member applicants may invite up to two students (one of which may be a graduate student) to participate in the research project. Student participation is at the option of the faculty applicant.

391

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - R.C. Murphy | U.S. DOE Office  

Office of Science (SC) Website

R.C. Murphy R.C. Murphy National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - R.C. Murphy Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and the R.C. Murphy team at the 2010 National Science Bowl competition in Washington, DC on May 3, 2010.

392

DOE/EIS-0279; Savannah River Site Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (March 2000)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTIONS TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTIONS DOE/EIS-0279 March 2000 Technology Descriptions A-iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page A.1 New Packaging Technologies .......................................................................................... A-1 A.1.1 Direct Disposal................................................................................................... A-1 A.1.2 Direct Co-Disposal............................................................................................. A-2 A.2 New Processing Technologies.......................................................................................... A-2 A.2.1 Melt and Dilute .................................................................................................. A-2 A.2.2 Press and Dilute .................................................................................................

393

DOE/EIS-0279; Savannah River Site Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (March 2000)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTIONS TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTIONS DOE/EIS-0279 March 2000 Technology Descriptions A-iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page A.1 New Packaging Technologies .......................................................................................... A-1 A.1.1 Direct Disposal................................................................................................... A-1 A.1.2 Direct Co-Disposal............................................................................................. A-2 A.2 New Processing Technologies.......................................................................................... A-2 A.2.1 Melt and Dilute .................................................................................................. A-2 A.2.2 Press and Dilute .................................................................................................

394

DOE/EV-0005/30 LA-8890-ENV UC-70 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

0 0 LA-8890-ENV UC-70 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Site of a Former Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Plant (TA-45) and the Effluent Receiving Areas of Acid, Pueblo, and Los Alamos Canyons, Los Alamos, New Mexico May 1981 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Protection, Safety, and Emergency Preparedness Environmental and Safety Engineering Division Washington, DC 20545 Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 PREFACE This series of reports results from a program initiated in 1974 by the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) for determination of the condition of sites formerly utilized by the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) and the AEC for work involving the handling of radioactive materials. Since the early

395

Scoping evaluation of the technical capabilities of DOE sites for disposal of hazardous metals in mixed low-level waste  

SciTech Connect

A team of analysts designed and conducted a scoping evaluation to estimate the technical capabilities of fifteen Department of Energy sites for disposal of the hazardous metals in mixed low-level waste (i.e., waste that contains both low-level radioactive materials and hazardous constituents). Eight hazardous metals were evaluated: arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver. The analysis considered transport only through the groundwater pathway. The results are reported as site-specific estimates of maximum concentrations of each hazardous metal in treated mixed low-level waste that do not exceed the performance measures established for the analysis. Also reported are site-specific estimates of travel times of each hazardous metal to the point of compliance.

Gruebel, M.M.; Waters, R.D.; Langkopf, B.S.

1997-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

396

DOE/EIS-0075-SA-02: Operational and Engineering Modifications and Regulatory Review Supplemental Analysis of Site-Specific and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statements (September 2009)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS OF SITE-SPECIFIC AND PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS: OPERATIONAL AND ENGINEERING MODIFICATIONS, AND REGULATORY REVIEW U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve 900 Commerce Road East New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 September 2009 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Page 3 of 51 Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office under Contract No. DE-AC96-03PO92207 DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company 850 South Clearview Parkway New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 Page 4 of 51 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Table of Contents I. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 6

397

Science to support DOE site cleanup: The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Environmental Management Science Program awards. Fiscal year 1998 mid-year progress report  

SciTech Connect

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory was awarded ten (10) Environmental Management Science Program (EMSP) research grants in Fiscal Year 1996 and six (6) in Fiscal Year 1997. This section summarizes how each grant addresses significant US Department of Energy (DOE) cleanup issues, including those at the Hanford Site. The technical progress made to date in each of these research projects is addressed in more detail in the individual progress reports contained in this document. This research is focused primarily in four areas: Tank Waste Remediation, Spent Nuclear Fuel and Nuclear Materials, Soil and Groundwater Cleanup, and Health Effects.

NONE

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

398

Science to Support DOE Site Cleanup: The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Environmental Management Science Program Awards-Fiscal Year 1999 Mid-Year Progress Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory was awarded ten Environmental Management Science Program (EMSP) research grants in fiscal year 1996, six in fiscal year 1997, and eight in fiscal year 1998. This section summarizes how each grant addresses significant U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) cleanup issues, including those at the Hanford Site. The technical progress made to date in each of these research projects is addressed in more detail in the individual progress reports contained in this document. This research is focused primarily in five areas: Tank Waste Remediation, Decontamination and Decommissioning, Spent Nuclear Fuel and Nuclear Materials, Soil and Groundwater Clean Up, and Health Effects.

Peurrung, L.M.

1999-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

399

DOE/EA-1499; Radiological/Nuclear Countermeasures Test and Evaluation Complex, Nevada Test Site Final Environmental Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

499 499 Radiological/Nuclear Countermeasures Test and Evaluation Complex, Nevada Test Site Final Environmental Assessment August 2004 U. S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Las Vegas, Nevada Available for sale to the Public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 800.553.6847 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: orders@ntis..gov Online Ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm Available electronically at: http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors in paper from-- U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information

400

2010 DOE National Science Bowl Photos - Gale Range Middle School...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl U.S. Department of Energy SC-27 Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P:...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

2010 DOE National Science Bowl Photos - Albuquerque Academy...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl U.S. Department of Energy SC-27 Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P:...

402

Contact | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contact Community College Internships (CCI) CCI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Contact Print...

403

Contact | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contact Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Contact Print Text...

404

Volunteers | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

NSB Home Volunteers National Science Bowl (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home...

405

Contact | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contact Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) SULI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS...

406

Benefits | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Benefits Community College Internships (CCI) CCI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Benefits...

407

Community College Internships (CCI) Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

CCI Home CCI Home Community College Internships (CCI) CCI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home The application process is now closed for The Community College Internships (CCI) Program Please see the DOE CCI program website for more information. 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Announcements View Applications Status for the 2014 Community College Internship (CCI) program External link CCI Program Overview The Community College Internship (CCI) program seeks to encourage community college students to enter technical careers relevant to the DOE mission by providing technical training experiences at the DOE laboratories. Selected students participate as interns appointed at one of 15 participating DOE

408

Developing a Research Proposal | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Developing a Research Proposal Developing a Research Proposal Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Developing a Research Proposal Recommender Information Student Participants Submitting a Proposal to DOE Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Developing a Research Proposal Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Developing a Research Project and Required Proposal with a DOE Laboratory Prior to applying, eligible faculty are strongly encouraged to reach out to scientific or engineering staff at the DOE National Laboratory best aligned with their research interests, and work to co-develop a research project plan, which can help provide a basis for the required co-written

409

Record of Technical Change {number_sign}2 for ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 240: Area 25 Vehicle Washdown, Nevada Test Site, Nevada,'' Revision 0, DOE/NV--532  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Record of Technical Change updates the technical informatioin provided in ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 240: Area 25 Vehicle Washdown, Nevada Test Site, Nevada,'' Revision 0, DOE/NV--532.

USDOE Nevada Operations Office

2000-03-16T23:59:59.000Z

410

Hydraulic fracture model and diagnostics verification at GRI/DOE multi-site projects and tight gas sand program support. Final report, July 28, 1993--February 28, 1997  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Mesaverde Group of the Piceance Basin in western Colorado has been a pilot study area for government-sponsored tight gas sand research for over twenty years. Early production experiments included nuclear stimulations and massive hydraulic fracture treatments. This work culminated in the US Department of Energy (DOE)`s Multiwell Experiment (MWX), a field laboratory designed to study the reservoir and production characteristics of low permeability sands. A key feature of MWX was an infrastructure which included several closely spaced wells that allowed detailed characterization of the reservoir through log and core analysis, and well testing. Interference and tracer tests, as well as the use of fracture diagnostics gave further information on stimulation and production characteristics. Thus, the Multiwell Experiment provided a unique opportunity for identifying the factors affecting production from tight gas sand reservoirs. The purpose of this operation was to support the gathering of field data that may be used to resolve the number of unknowns associated with measuring and modeling the dimensions of hydraulic fractures. Using the close-well infrastructure at the Multiwell Site near Rifle, Colorado, this operation focused primarily on the field design and execution of experiments. The data derived from the experiments were gathered and analyzed by DOE team contractors.

Schroeder, J.E.

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

411

Review of PV module performance at DOE/MIT Lincoln Laboratory test sites during the period 1977 to 1982  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

During the years 1977 to 1982, over 11,000 photovoltaic (PV) modules have been placed at experimental PV power generating systems in a number of field test sites in the United States. Prominent among these are a 100-kW system at Natural Bridges National Monument in Utah, a 25-kWp system at Mead, Nebraska, and a 15-kW system at Bryan, Ohio. Through a program of periodic surveillance, measurements, and inspections at the aforementioned sites, electrically failed modules were located, removed and analyzed during this six-year period. The principal causes of failure were: (1) cells cracked due to weathering or internal module stresses, (2) failed solder joints, (3) interconnects not soldered to rear sides of cells at assembly, (4) cells or interconnects electrically shorted to metallic substrates, and (5) broken or split interconnects. Details and photographs of many of the different types of failures are presented and some of the analysis techniques used to locate the failures are described.

Forman, S E; Themelis, M P

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

412

Kansas State University: DOE/KEURP Site Operator Program. Year 4, fourth quarterly report, April 1, 1995--June 30, 1995  

SciTech Connect

Kansas State University, in support of a DOE and Kansas Electric Utilities Research Program subject contract, continues to test, evaluate, demonstrate, and develop electric vehicle and infrastructure technology. K-State is operating two Soleq EVcort vehicles. During this reporting period both vehicles were brought back to full operational status after warranty service was completed by Soleq. Vehicle failures occurred due to three unrelated battery cable failures in addition to the replacement of one battery. Both vehicles are being operated on a routine basis. K-State, along with York Technical College, has established a relationship with Troy Design and Manufacturing (TDM) Redford, Michigan. K-State has ordered no less than four Ford Ranger electric trucks from TDM. K-State is involved in the steering committee that is monitoring and refining information to direct the design and testing of these new technology vehicles. TDM should become the first automotive manufacturer certified by one of the Big Three under their Quality Vehicle Manufacturer program. Kansas State University and the Kansas Electric Utility Research Program look forward to working with TDM on their new EV program.

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

413

Evaluation of the Atmospheric Transport Model in the MACCS2 Code and its Impact on Decision Making at DOE Sites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Atmospheric the Atmospheric Transport Model in the MACCS2 Code and its Impact on Decision Making at Department of Energy Sites John E. Till and Arthur S. Rood June 5, 2012 RAC Historical Dose Reconstruction Projects Environmental Risk Assessment "Understanding and communicating the movement of radionuclides and chemicals released to the environment, resulting exposure to humans, and the subsequent dose or risk from exposure." Types of Dose/Risk  Medical  Occupational  Public Dose/Risk Can Be Estimated for  Real people  Hypothetical people Purpose of Assessments  Compliance  Decision making  Epidemiology  Emergency response Approaches to Estimating Risk  In certain situations, and depending upon the decisions to be made, if the results of relatively

414

DOE/OR/20722-22 UC-70A DBaffu Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

22 22 UC-70A DBaffu Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-ACO5-81OR20722 c P c P RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE DUPONT CHAMBER WORKS PLANT Deepwater, New Jersey Bechtel National, Inc. Advanced Technology Division June 1984 Technical Information Center Office of Scientific and Technical Information U.S. Department of Energy -- .,,.... - ~S",.W -. - - -. _ -- --- --.- ----.-- ___ ..---. -.~ LEGAL NOTICE ' I91i.m report war prepared u M account of work rponsored by the United SUWO Government. Neither the United State6 nor the United Stator Department of Energy. nor any of their employee& DO1 any of their COnb8CWlr, rubcontractorr, or their employns. make6 any wananty. expmr or implied. or l 66ume6 any legal liability or responribility for the accuracy, completeness

415

STEAM REFORMING TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF ORGANICS ON ACTUAL DOE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE TANK 48H WASTE 9138  

SciTech Connect

This paper describes the design of the Bench-scale Steam Reformer (BSR); a processing unit for demonstrating steam reforming technology on actual radioactive waste [1]. It describes the operating conditions of the unit used for processing a sample of Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank 48H waste. Finally, it compares the results from processing the actual waste in the BSR to processing simulant waste in the BSR to processing simulant waste in a large pilot scale unit, the Fluidized Bed Steam Reformer (FBSR), operated at Hazen Research Inc. in Golden, CO. The purpose of this work was to prove that the actual waste reacted in the same manner as the simulant waste in order to validate the work performed in the pilot scale unit which could only use simulant waste.

Burket, P

2009-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

416

DOE/EA-1440-S-1: Final Supplement to the Final Site-Wide Environmental Assessment of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's South Table Mountain Complex (May 2008)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL SITE-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL SITE-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY'S SOUTH TABLE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX Proposed Construction and Operation of: - Research Support Facilities, - Infrastructure Improvements (Phase I), - Upgrades to the Thermochemical User Facility and Addition of the Thermochemical Biorefinery Pilot Plant May 2008 U . S . D e p a r t m e n t o f E n e r g y G o l d e n F i e l d O f f i c e N a t i o n a l R e n e w a b l e E n e r g y L a b o r a t o r y 1 6 1 7 C o l e B o u l e v a r d G o l d e n , C o l o r a d o 8 0 4 0 1 DOE/EA-1440-S-1 Department of Energy Golden Field Office 161 7 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401 -3305 May 14,2008 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT for SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL SITE-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY'S

417

Hawaii Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Hawaii Regions Hawaii Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Hawaii Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Hawaii Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

418

Arizona Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Arizona Regions Arizona Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Arizona Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Arizona Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

419

Delaware Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Delaware Regions Delaware Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Delaware Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Delaware Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

420

Oregon Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Oregon Regions Oregon Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Oregon Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Oregon Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Iowa Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Iowa Regions Iowa Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Iowa Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Iowa Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

422

Utah Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Utah Regions Utah Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Utah Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Utah Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

423

Arkansas Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Arkansas Regions Arkansas Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Arkansas Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Arkansas Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

424

Minnesota Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Minnesota Regions Minnesota Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Minnesota Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Minnesota Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

425

Georgia Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Georgia Regions Georgia Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Georgia Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Georgia Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

426

Tennessee Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Tennessee Regions Tennessee Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Tennessee Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Tennessee Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

427

Transcribed Media | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Transcribed Media SC Home About ASCR HEP SBIR & STTR WDTS Contact Information Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5430 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page SC Home 2012 A Flight Through the Universe, by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Behind the Scenes at Berkeley Lab Science Lecture Series: Dr. Goyal Enrico Fermi Award Ceremony The Secretary and the Scientists The Building Blocks of a Detector for Nature's Building Blocks Ernest Orlando Lawrence Award Ceremony LBNL Computational Research and Theory Facility Groundbreaking Science Lecture Series: Higgs Boson, Dr. Incandela Dr. Perlmutter at DOE A Swell Electrode LNMO Nanoparticle 2011 Carbon Exchange Construction of the Dark Energy Camera

428

Connecticut Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Connecticut Regions Connecticut Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Connecticut Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Connecticut Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

429

Florida Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Florida Regions Florida Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Florida Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Florida Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

430

Massachusetts Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Massachusetts Regions Massachusetts Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Massachusetts Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Massachusetts Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

431

Alaska Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Alaska Regions Alaska Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Alaska Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Alaska Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

432

Wyoming Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Wyoming Regions Wyoming Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Wyoming Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Wyoming Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

433

Ohio Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Ohio Regions Ohio Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Ohio Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Ohio Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

434

Alaska Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Alaska Regions Alaska Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Alaska Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Alaska Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

435

Minnesota Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Minnesota Regions Minnesota Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Minnesota Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Minnesota Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

436

Idaho Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Idaho Regions Idaho Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Idaho Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Idaho Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

437

Michigan Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Michigan Regions Michigan Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Michigan Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Michigan Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

438

Texas Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Texas Regions Texas Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Texas Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Texas Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

439

Missouri Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Missouri Regions Missouri Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Missouri Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Missouri Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

440

Kentucky Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Kentucky Regions Kentucky Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Kentucky Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Kentucky Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe wdts site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

California Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

California Regions California Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals California Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page California Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

442

Pennsylvania Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Pennsylvania Regions Pennsylvania Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Pennsylvania Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Pennsylvania Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

443

Coordinator Resources | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Regional Science Bowl Coordinators » Coordinator Resources National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Regional Science Bowl Coordinators Coordinator Resources Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Here you will find information for your regional competitions.

444

Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) Homepage | U.S. DOE  

Office of Science (SC) Website

SULI Home SULI Home Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) SULI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home The application process is now closed for the Summer Term of The Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) Program Please see the DOE SULI program website for more information.Read More LBNL 2011 SULI 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Announcements View Applications Status for the 2014 Summer Term of the SULI Program External link . View the Application Status for the 2014 Spring Term of the SULI Program External link SULI Program Overview The Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internship (SULI) program encourages undergraduate students to pursue science, technology, engineering, and

445

Virginia Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Virginia Regions Virginia Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Virginia Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Virginia Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

446

Indiana Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Indiana Regions Indiana Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Indiana Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Indiana Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

447

Oklahoma Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Oklahoma Regions Oklahoma Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Oklahoma Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Oklahoma Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

448

Michigan Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Michigan Regions Michigan Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Michigan Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Michigan Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county,