Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Seagate Crystal Reports - Snf10  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Stream Characteristic Detail (SNF-10) Stream Characteristic Detail (SNF-10) STATE: California SITE: GenAtomics PROGRAM: Office of Environmental Management OPERATIONS OFFICE: Oakland Operations Office GenAtomics - Spent Nuclear Fuel - TRIG A Reactor SNF STREAM CODE: 01725 Stream Fuel Types DOE Test SNF SST clad Storage Facility % of Stream Quantity GA TRIGA Reactor Facility 100 % of Stream Quantity Source Reactor GA-TRIGA MARK F 100.00 % of Stream TOTAL CURIES: ISOTOPE AND CONTAMINANT PROFILES 100 TRIGA Reactor SNF Isotopes Avg Concentration: 1.7706E-006 Ci Low Limit Concent: Upper Limit Concent: Actinium-227 Avg Concentration: 2.6087E+001 Ci Low Limit Concent: Upper Limit Concent: Americium-241 Avg Concentration: 1.1960E-001 Ci Low Limit Concent: Upper Limit Concent: Americium-242m Avg Concentration: 5.0739E-002 Ci

2

Data Report on Corrosion Testing of Stainless Steel SNF Storage Canisters |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Data Report on Corrosion Testing of Stainless Steel SNF Storage Data Report on Corrosion Testing of Stainless Steel SNF Storage Canisters Data Report on Corrosion Testing of Stainless Steel SNF Storage Canisters The report assesses the localized corrosion performance of container/cask materials used in the interim storage of used nuclear fuel. A detailed evaluation of the storage system environment, including uncertainties in temperature, humidity, and sea and continental salt occurrence is provided, and the potential impacts on corrosion are discussed. Initial results from a sampling program of in situ dust deposits on in-service storage canisters are provided. The results of dust deliquescence testing, to evaluate potential stifling of corrosion due the limited mass of the deposited salts, are presented. CorrosionTestStainlessSteelSNFStorContainer.pdf

3

National spent fuel program preliminary report RCRA characteristics of DOE-owned spent nuclear fuel DOE-SNF-REP-002. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents information on the preliminary process knowledge to be used in characterizing all Department of Energy (DOE)-owned Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) types that potentially exhibit a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) characteristic. This report also includes the process knowledge, analyses, and rationale used to preliminarily exclude certain SNF types from RCRA regulation under 40 CFR {section}261.4(a)(4), ``Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste,`` as special nuclear and byproduct material. The evaluations and analyses detailed herein have been undertaken as a proactive approach. In the event that DOE-owned SNF is determined to be a RCRA solid waste, this report provides general direction for each site regarding further characterization efforts. The intent of this report is also to define the path forward to be taken for further evaluation of specific SNF types and a recommended position to be negotiated and established with regional and state regulators throughout the DOE Complex regarding the RCRA-related policy issues.

NONE

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

4

Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Storage Project Fuel Basket Handling Grapple Design Development Test Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Acceptance testing of the SNF Fuel Basket Lift Grapple was accomplished to verify the design adequacy. This report shows the results affirming the design. The test was successful in demonstrating the adequacy of the grapple assembly's inconel actuator shaft and engagement balls for in loads excess of design basis loads (3200 pounds), 3X design basis loads (9600 pounds), and 5X design basis loads (16,000 pounds). The test data showed that no appreciable yielding for the inconel actuator shaft and engagement balls at loads in excess of 5X Design Basis loads. The test data also showed the grapple assembly and components to be fully functional after loads in excess of 5X Design Basis were applied and maintained for over 10 minutes. Following testing, each actuator shaft (Item 7) was liquid penetrant inspected per ASME Section 111, Division 1 1989 and accepted per requirements of NF-5350. This examination was performed to insure that no cracking had occurred. The test indicated that no cracking had occurred. The examination reports are included as Appendix C to this document. From this test, it is concluded that the design configuration meets or exceeds the requirements specified in ANSI N 14 6 for Special Lifting Devices for Shipping Containers Weighing 10,000 Pounds (4500 kg) or More.

CHENAULT, D.M.

2000-01-06T23:59:59.000Z

5

Seagate Crystal Reports - Snf91  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Facility (SNF-9) Facility (SNF-9) STATE: California SITE: General Atomics OPERATIONS OFFICE: Oakland Operations Office S N F S t r e a m Fuel T y p e s S N F S t r e a m N a m e R e p o r t i n g S i t e T o t a l C u r i e s f o r S t r e a m S o u r c e R e a c t o r ( s ) T o t a l C u r r e n t Y e a r I n v e n t o r y Q u a n t i t y ( M T H M ) * % Quantity f r o m S o u r c e R e a c t o r Facility: GA TRIGA Reactor Facility DOE Test SNF SST clad TRIGA Reactor SNF GenAtomics 0.0620 GA-TRIGA MARK F 100 S N F S t r e a m Fuel T y p e s S N F S t r e a m N a m e R e p o r t i n g S i t e T o t a l C u r i e s f o r S t r e a m S o u r c e R e a c t o r ( s ) T o t a l C u r r e n t Y e a r I n v e n t o r y Q u a n t i t y ( M T H M ) * % Quantity f r o m S o u r c e R e a c t o r Facility: Hot Cell Facility Graphite type SNF Hot Cell Facility Irradiated Fuel Materials - High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) GenAtomics 0.0002 Various Test Reactors 100 DOE Test SNF SST clad Hot Cell Facility Irradiated Fuel Material - Reduced-Enrichment Research and Test Reactor (RERTR)

6

Drop Testing of DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Canisters  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program (NSNFP) at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory INEEL) prepared four representative Department of Energy DOE) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) canisters for the purpose of drop testing. The first two canisters represented a modified 24- inch diameter standardized DOE SNF canister and the second two canisters represented the Hanford Multi-Canister Overpack MCO). The modified canisters and internals were constructed and assembled at the INEEL. The MCO internal weights were fabricated at the INEEL and assembled into two MCOs at Hanford and later shipped to the INEEL for drop test preparation. Drop testing of these four canisters was completed in August 2004 at Sandia National Laboratories. The modified canisters were dropped from 30 feet onto a flat, essentially unyielding surface, with the canisters oriented at 45 degrees and 70 degrees off-vertical at impact. One representative MCO was dropped from 23 feet onto the same flat surface, oriented vertically at impact. The second representative MCO was dropped onto the flat surface from 2 feet oriented at 60 degrees off-vertical. These drop heights and orientations were chosen to meet or exceed the Yucca Mountain repository drop criteria. This paper discusses the comparison of deformations between the actual dropped canisters and those predicted by pre-drop and limited post-drop finite element evaluations performed using ABAQUS/Explicit. Post-drop containment of all four canisters, demonstrated by way of helium leak testing, is also discussed.

S. D. Snow; D. K. Morton; T. E. Rahl; R. K. Blandford; T. J. Hill

2005-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

7

DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements March 16, 2010 - 4:28pm...

8

Commercial SNF Accident Release Fractions  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this analysis is to specify and document the total and respirable fractions for radioactive materials that could be potentially released from an accident at the repository involving commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in a dry environment. The total and respirable release fractions are used to support the preclosure licensing basis for the repository. The total release fraction is defined as the fraction of total commercial SNF assembly inventory, typically expressed as an activity inventory (e.g., curies), of a given radionuclide that is released to the environment from a waste form. Radionuclides are released from the inside of breached fuel rods (or pins) and from the detachment of radioactive material (crud) from the outside surfaces of fuel rods and other components of fuel assemblies. The total release fraction accounts for several mechanisms that tend to retain, retard, or diminish the amount of radionuclides that are available for transport to dose receptors or otherwise can be shown to reduce exposure of receptors to radiological releases. The total release fraction includes a fraction of airborne material that is respirable and could result in inhalation doses; this subset of the total release fraction is referred to as the respirable release fraction. Accidents may involve waste forms characterized as: (1) bare unconfined intact fuel assemblies, (2) confined intact fuel assemblies, or (3) canistered failed commercial SNF. Confined intact commercial SNF assemblies at the repository are contained in shipping casks, canisters, or waste packages. Four categories of failed commercial SNF are identified: (1) mechanically and cladding-penetration damaged commercial SNF, (2) consolidated/reconstituted assemblies, (3) fuel rods, pieces, and debris, and (4) nonfuel components. It is assumed that failed commercial SNF is placed into waste packages with a mesh screen at each end (CRWMS M&O 1999). In contrast to bare unconfined fuel assemblies, the container that confines the fuel assemblies could provide an additional barrier for diminishing the total release fraction should the fuel rod cladding breach during an accident. This analysis, however, does not take credit for the additional barrier and establishes only the total release fractions for bare unconfined intact commercial SNF assemblies, which may be conservatively applied to confined intact commercial I SNF assemblies.

J. Schulz

2004-11-05T23:59:59.000Z

9

Drug Testing for DOE Positions | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Drug Testing for DOE Positions Drug Testing for DOE Positions Drug Testing for DOE Positions Drug Testing Matrix Secretary Bodman's Memorandum Regarding Drug Testing at DOE Fact...

10

Long-term management of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) and spent nuclear fuel (SNF)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

GC-52 provides legal advice to DOE regarding the long-term management of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) and spent nuclear fuel (SNF). SNF is nuclear fuel that has been used as fuel in a reactor...

11

DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements March 16, 2010 - 4:28pm Addthis DOE-initiated testing has revealed that a Samsung refrigerator (model RF26VAB), which the company had claimed was Energy Star compliant, consumed more energy than permitted by the Energy Star program. Test results for the Samsung model at issue show that, when tested in accordance with DOE's test procedure, it consumed between 7 and 11.4 percent more energy than the Energy Star requirement. Samsung is no longer manufacturing this model, although it may still be available from some retail outlets. Based on this testing, DOE is referring Samsung Model RF26VAB to the U.S.

12

AHAM DOE Verification Test Agreement | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Verification Test Agreement AHAM DOE Verification Test Agreement This letter is to inform AHAM that DOE is adopting a new policy regarding DOE ENERGY STAR verification testing...

13

Seagate Crystal Reports - SNF84  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Source Reactor (SNF-8) Source Reactor (SNF-8) Source Reactor Location: Argentina Bariloche T o t a l C u r r e n t Y e a r I n v e n t o r y Q u a n t i t y ( M T HM )* Q u a n t i t y f r o m S o u r c e Re a c t o r ( M T HM ) P l a n n e d Dis p o s i t i o n S i t e % Q u a n t i t y f r o m S o u r c e R e a c t o r DOE G e n e r a t i n g P r o g r a m S N F S t r e a m N a m e M a n a g i n g D O E S i t e T o t a l C u r i e s f o r S t r e a m RA-6 S o u r c e R e a c t o r N a m e : MTRE Type Al SNF (FRR/DRR) Savannah EM 0.0000 Savannah 0.00 2.0810 Source Reactor Location: Argentina Buenos Aires T o t a l C u r r e n t Y e a r I n v e n t o r y Q u a n t i t y ( M T HM )* Q u a n t i t y f r o m S o u r c e Re a c t o r ( M T HM ) P l a n n e d Dis p o s i t i o n S i t e % Q u a n t i t y f r o m S o u r c e R e a c t o r DOE G e n e r a t i n g P r o g r a m S N F S t r e a m N a m e M a n a g i n g D O E S i t e T o t a l C u r i e s f o r S t r e a m RA-3 S o u r c e R e a c t o r N a m e : MTRE Type Al SNF (FRR/DRR) Savannah EM 0.0287 Savannah 1.38 2.0810 Source Reactor Location: Argentina Cordoba T

14

Seagate Crystal Reports - Snf36  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Spent Nuclear Fuel Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Activities Quantities by Date Range (SNF-3) Final Disposition Activity (MTHM)*** Total Ship for Disposal Ship to Other DOE Site for Management/Storage On-Site Treatment Off-Site Receipts Total SNF Amount to be Managed (MTHM)*** Site Starting Inventory On-Site Generation STATE: California SITE: General Atomics PROGRAM: Office of Environmental Management YEAR RANGE: Non-Annualized & All Years OPERATIONS OFFICE: Oakland Operations Office 1998 (A)* 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0652 0.0652 0.0000 1999 (A)* 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0652 0.0652 0.0000 2000 (A)* 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0652 0.0652 0.0000 2001 (P)* 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0652 0.0652 0.0000 2002 (P)* 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0652 0.0652 0.0000 2003 (P)*

15

DOE's Round Robin Test Program FAQ Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Frequently Asked Questions for: Frequently Asked Questions for: DOE's Round Robin Test Program May 2011 i Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 What products will be tested? .......................................................................................................... 1 What is the testing process? .............................................................................................................. 1 What labs can participate in testing? ............................................................................................... 2 Who pays for the testing? ................................................................................................................. 2

16

DOE and Partners Test Enhanced Geothermal Systems Technologies...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DOE and Partners Test Enhanced Geothermal Systems Technologies DOE and Partners Test Enhanced Geothermal Systems Technologies February 20, 2008 - 4:33pm Addthis DOE has embarked on...

17

DOE-STD-3022-98; DOE Standard DOE HEPA Filter Test Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22-98 22-98 May 1998 Superseding DOE NE F 3-42 January 1987 DOE STANDARD DOE HEPA FILTER TEST PROGRAM U.S. Department of Energy FSC 4460 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Order No. DE98001294 DOE-STD-3022-98 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard is approved for use by all DOE components and contractors.

18

Secretary Bodman's Memorandum Regarding Drug Testing at DOE ...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Secretary Bodman's Memorandum Regarding Drug Testing at DOE Secretary Bodman's Memorandum Regarding Drug Testing at DOE September 14, 2007 In consideration of the report on the...

19

Flow Test At Wister Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At Wister Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At Wister Area (DOE GTP) Exploration Activity...

20

Flow Test At Colrado Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At Colrado Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At Colrado Area (DOE GTP) Exploration Activity...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Flow Test At Alum Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At Alum Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At Alum Area (DOE GTP) Exploration Activity Details...

22

DOE Withdraws Proposed Rulemaking (Test Procedure) and Proposed...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Withdraws Proposed Rulemaking (Test Procedure) and Proposed Coverage Determination (Energy Conservation Standard) for Set-Top Boxes DOE Withdraws Proposed Rulemaking (Test...

23

DOE Cell Component Accelerated Stress Test Protocols for PEM...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Cell Component Accelerated Stress Test Protocols for PEM Fuel Cells DOE Cell Component Accelerated Stress Test Protocols for PEM Fuel Cells This document describes test protocols...

24

SNF Project Engineering Process Improvement Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This plan documents the SNF Project activities and plans to support its engineering process. It describes five SNF Project Engineering initiatives: new engineering procedures, qualification cards process; configuration management, engineering self assessments, and integrated schedule for engineering activities.

DESAI, S.P.

2000-02-09T23:59:59.000Z

25

Recent DOE sponsored electrochemical capacitor test results  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Electrochemical capacitors (ultracapacitors) are being developed for hybrid vehicles as candidate power assist devices for the fast response engine and for other energy storage systems that can utilize the high power densities available from these devices. Ultracapacitors show promise toward being able to accept high regenerative pulses and high power delivery capabilities while exhibiting very high cycle life. This paper will present recent test data from two US Department of Energy (DOE) supported ultracapacitor projects designed to meet the fast response engine requirements. Constant-current and constant-power test results will be presented that have been acquired from recent prototype capacitors supplied by SAFT America, Inc. (ten devices), and Maxwell Energy Products, Inc. (two devices). The SAFT capacitors are rated at 0.5 V to 3 V with capacitance ratings ranging from 135 F to 138 F. Capacitor cells rated at 2.3 V and 101.4 F were also evaluated that were produced by Maxwell Energy Products, Inc. Both sets of devices used proprietary carbon electrodes with non-aqueous electrolytes in their design. From the constant-current discharge tests, the discharge current dependence of the capacitance, equivalent series resistance, and RC-time constant were determined as well as the capacitors' voltage dependence of the capacitance. Constant-power discharge tests permitted the specific energy as a function of the specific power to be determined, and also the discharge/charge round trip efficiency as a function of the magnitude of the constant-power discharge.

Wright, R.B.; Murphy, T.C.; Jamison, D.K.; Rogers, S.A.

2000-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

DOE Publishes Final Rule for Residential Furnace Fan Test Procedure...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DOE Publishes Final Rule for Residential Furnace Fan Test Procedure DOE Publishes Final Rule for Residential Furnace Fan Test Procedure January 3, 2014 - 12:00am Addthis The...

27

DOE's Round Robin Test Program FAQ Sheet | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE's Round Robin Test Program FAQ Sheet DOE's Round Robin Test Program FAQ Sheet This document is the May 2011 version of the Frequently Asked Questions about the US Department of...

28

DOE Publishes Final Rule for Residential Furnace Fan Test Procedure  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy (DOE) has published a final rule regarding test procedures for residential furnace fans.

29

DOE Verification Testing in Support of ENERGY STAR, April 22...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Verification Testing in Support of ENERGY STAR, April 22, 2011 DOE Verification Testing in Support of ENERGY STAR, April 22, 2011 This document describes ENERGY STAR verificaion...

30

DOE Pens New Agreement with Southern Company to Test Advanced...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Pens New Agreement with Southern Company to Test Advanced Carbon-Capture & Gasification Technologies DOE Pens New Agreement with Southern Company to Test Advanced Carbon-Capture &...

31

DOE Issues Test Procedure Final Rule & Publishes Energy Conservation...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Test Procedure Final Rule & Publishes Energy Conservation Standards NOPR for Electric Motors DOE Issues Test Procedure Final Rule & Publishes Energy Conservation Standards NOPR for...

32

Memorandum, Drug Testing at DOE - September 14, 2007 | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

on the Consequences of a Positive Drug Test Secretary Bodman's Memorandum Regarding Drug Testing at DOE Environment Worker Health & Safety Nuclear Safety Facility Safety Security...

33

CONTAINMENT EVALUATION OF BREACHED AL-SNF FOR CASK TRANSPORT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Aluminum-based spent nuclear fuel (Al-SNF) from foreign and domestic research reactors (FRR/DRR) is being shipped to the Savannah River Site. To enter the U.S., the cask with loaded fuel must be certified to comply with the requirements in the Title 10 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 71. The requirements include demonstration of containment of the cask with its contents under normal and accident conditions. Al-SNF is subject to corrosion degradation in water storage, and many of the fuel assemblies are ''failed'' or have through-clad damage. A methodology has been developed with technical bases to show that Al-SNF with cladding breaches can be directly transported in standard casks and maintained within the allowable release rates. The approach to evaluate the limiting allowable leakage rate, L{sub R}, for a cask with breached Al-SNF for comparison to its test leakage rate could be extended to other nuclear material systems. The approach for containment analysis of Al-SNF follows calculations for commercial spent fuel as provided in NUREG/CR-6487 that adopts ANSI N14.5 as a methodology for containment analysis. The material-specific features and characteristics of damaged Al-SNF (fuel materials, fabrication techniques, microstructure, radionuclide inventory, and vapor corrosion rates) that were derived from literature sources and/or developed in laboratory testing are applied to generate the four containment source terms that yield four separate cask cavity activity densities; namely, those from fines; gaseous fission product species; volatile fission product species; and fuel assembly crud. The activity values, A{sub 2}, are developed per the guidance of 10CFR71. The analysis is performed parametrically to evaluate maximum number of breached assemblies and exposed fuel area for a proposed shipment in a cask with a test leakage rate.

Vinson, D. W.; Sindelar, R. L.; Iyer, N. C.

2005-11-07T23:59:59.000Z

34

DOE Energy Star Testing Reveals Inefficient ASKO Dishwasher | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Star Testing Reveals Inefficient ASKO Dishwasher Energy Star Testing Reveals Inefficient ASKO Dishwasher DOE Energy Star Testing Reveals Inefficient ASKO Dishwasher June 1, 2010 - 2:07pm Addthis DOE testing in support of the Energy Star program has revealed that an ASKO dishwasher (model D5122XXLB), which the company had claimed was Energy Star compliant, consumes more energy than permitted by the Energy Star program. Test results for the ASKO model at issue show that, when tested in accordance with DOE's test procedure, it consumed 12 percent more energy than the Energy Star requirement. Based on this testing, DOE is referring ASKO Model D5122XXLB to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for appropriate action with respect to the Energy Star program. DOE's testing revealed that dishwasher model D5122XXLB also may not meet

35

Flow Test At Maui Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011) GTP ARRA Spreadsheet Additional References Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

36

Matrix, Drug Testing for DOE Security Clearance - September 1, 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Matrix, Drug Testing for DOE Security Clearance - September 1, 2011 Matrix, Drug Testing for DOE Security Clearance - September 1, 2011 Matrix, Drug Testing for DOE Security Clearance - September 1, 2011 September 1, 2011 The following matrix identifies those individuals required to have a current negative drug test as a prerequisite for being processed for a security clearance The following matrix identifies those individuals required to have a current negative drug test as a prerequisite for being processed for a security clearance. A current test is one taken within 60 calendar days of the individual's SF-86/SF-86C signature date. For those cases where no such form is collected (e.g. reciprocity) the test must have been taken within 60 calendar days of the date of the request for security clearance. Matrix, Drug Testing for DOE security clearance - September 1, 2011

37

DOE Publishes Report on Accelerated Life Testing of SSL Luminaires...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

(DOE) has published the findings of a new study utilizing a highly accelerated life-test method (called the "hammer test") intended to produce failures in SSL luminaires in a...

38

DOE Publishes Final Rule for Television Test Procedure | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Television Test Procedure DOE Publishes Final Rule for Television Test Procedure October 25, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis The Department of Energy has published a final rule regarding...

39

DOE Publishes Final Rule for Plumbing Products Test Procedures...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Plumbing Products Test Procedures DOE Publishes Final Rule for Plumbing Products Test Procedures October 23, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis The Department of Energy has published a final...

40

Seagate Crystal Reports - SNF53  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Shipping and Receiving Quantities (SNF-5) Shipping and Receiving Quantities (SNF-5) 201 1 -70(P)* & Non Annualized Quantity (MTHM) by Year 1999(A)* 2000(A)* 2001(P)* 2002(P)* 2003(P)* 2009(P)* 2010(P)* Shipping Site 1998(A)* 2008(P)* 2004(P)* 2005(P)* 2006(P)* 2007(P)* RECEIVING SITE: Idaho National Environmental Engineering Laboratory (INEL) PROGRAM: Office of Defense Programs NavRctrFac 0.0000 0.9000 0.7400 0.6200 0.6200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Sandia-NM 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total: 0.0000 0.9000 0.7400 0.6200 0.6200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 201 1 -70(P)* & Non Annualized Quantity (MTHM) by Year 1999(A)* 2000(A)* 2001(P)* 2002(P)* 2003(P)* 2009(P)* 2010(P)* Shipping Site 1998(A)* 2008(P)* 2004(P)* 2005(P)*

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Seagate Crystal Reports - Snf78  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Projections for Shipping and Receiving (SNF-7) Projections for Shipping and Receiving (SNF-7) RECEIVING SITE: Idaho National Environmental Engineering Laboratory (INEEL) STATE: California Idaho National Environmental Engineering Laboratory (INEEL) - Office of Environmental Management - Spent Nuclear Fuel - General Atomics (GA) Non-Annualized 2016-20(P) 2008(P) 2009(P) 2010(P) 2061-65(P) 2066-70(P) 2056-60(P) 2007 (P) 2041-45(P) 2004 (P) 2005 (P) 2021-25(P) 2026-30(P) 2031-35(P) 2036-40(P) 2006 (P) 2011-15(P) 2003 (P) Quantity Shipped (MTHM) Year 1998 (A) 1999 (A) 2000 (A) 2001 (P) 2002 (P) 2051-55(P) Year Quantity Shipped (MTHM) Year 2046-50(P) Quantity Shipped (MTHM) Quantity Shipped (MTHM) Quantity Shipped (MTHM) Year Year GenAtomics 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

42

DOE-STD-3025-99; DOE Standard Quality Assurance Inspection and Testing of HEPA Filters  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5-99 5-99 February 1999 Superseding DOE NE F 3-43 February 1990 DOE STANDARD QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTION AND TESTING OF HEPA FILTERS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 4460 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3025-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy standard supercedes DOE NE F 3-43 and is approved for use by all DOE

43

DOE-STD-3026-99; DOE Standard Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-99 6-99 February 1999 Superseding DOE NE F 3-44 July 1986 DOE STANDARD FILTER TEST FACILITY QUALITY PROGRAM PLAN U.S. Department of Energy FSC 4460 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3026-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy standard supercedes DOE NE F 3-44 and is approved for use by all DOE components and their contractors.

44

DOE Issues Final Appliance Test Procedure Rule | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appliance Test Procedure Rule Appliance Test Procedure Rule DOE Issues Final Appliance Test Procedure Rule December 8, 2006 - 9:46am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced a final rule establishing new test procedures and related definitions to determine the energy efficiency of certain residential appliances and commercial equipment. The rulemaking clarifies and codifies the test procedures mandated by the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005. "These new test procedures are the foundation for standards that will help bring more energy efficient options to the marketplace and result in energy savings for all Americans," said DOE Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Andy Karsner. The final rulemaking, which appears in today's Federal Register, will

45

DOE-STD-1065-94; DOE Standard Guideline to Good Practices For Postmaintenance Testing at DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

65-94 65-94 June 1994 DOE STANDARD GUIDELINE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR POSTMAINTENANCE TESTING AT DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MNTY Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94014953 DOE-STD-1065-94 FOREWORD The purpose of the Guide to Good Practices for Postm aintenance T esting at DOE Nuclear Facilities is to provide contractor maintenance

46

CRITICALITY CALCULATION FOR THE MOST REACTIVE DEGRADED CONFIGURATIONS OF THE FFTF SNF CODISPOSAL WP CONTAINING AN INTACT IDENT-69 CONTAINER  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of this calculation is to perform additional degraded mode criticality evaluations of the Department of Energy's (DOE) Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) codisposed in a 5-Defense High-Level Waste (5-DHLW) Waste Package (WP). The scope of this calculation is limited to the most reactive degraded configurations of the codisposal WP with an almost intact Ident-69 container (breached and flooded but otherwise non-degraded) containing intact FFTF SNF pins. The configurations have been identified in a previous analysis (CRWMS M&O 1999a) and the present evaluations include additional relevant information that was left out of the original calculations. The additional information describes the exact distribution of fissile material in each container (DOE 2002a). The effects of the changes that have been included in the baseline design of the codisposal WP (CRWMS M&O 2000) are also investigated. The calculation determines the effective neutron multiplication factor (k{sub eff}) for selected degraded mode internal configurations of the codisposal waste package. These calculations will support the demonstration of the technical viability of the design solution adopted for disposing of MOX (FFTF) spent nuclear fuel in the potential repository. This calculation is subject to the Quality Assurance Requirements and Description (QARD) (DOE 2002b) per the activity evaluation under work package number P6212310M2 in the technical work plan TWP-MGR-MD-000010 REV 01 (BSC 2002).

D.R. Moscalu

2002-08-28T23:59:59.000Z

47

DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure June 30, 2010 - 3:02pm Addthis Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a draft interpretative rule clarifying its views on the application of the current residential clothes washer test procedure to machines that offer a warm rinse option that is not included in the recommended cycle for washing cotton or linen clothes. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here, until July 30, 2010. Addthis Related Articles DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead Save Energy and More with ENERGY STAR. ENERGY STAR clothes washers use 50% less energy to wash clothes than standard washing machines.

48

DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure June 30, 2010 - 3:02pm Addthis Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a draft interpretative rule clarifying its views on the application of the current residential clothes washer test procedure to machines that offer a warm rinse option that is not included in the recommended cycle for washing cotton or linen clothes. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here, until July 30, 2010. Addthis Related Articles Save Energy and More with ENERGY STAR. ENERGY STAR clothes washers use 50% less energy to wash clothes than standard washing machines. Tips: Laundry DOE Solicits Views on the Implementation of Large-Capacity Clothes Washer

49

DOE Launches Public Test Procedure Guidance Website | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Launches Public Test Procedure Guidance Website Launches Public Test Procedure Guidance Website DOE Launches Public Test Procedure Guidance Website July 22, 2010 - 4:14pm Addthis The Department of Energy this week launched a new online database offering guidance on the Department's test procedures for appliances and commercial equipment. The new database will provide a publicly accessible forum for anyone with questions about -- or needing clarification of -- DOE's test procedures. This new online resource will also ensure that all manufacturers and members of the public are equally and immediately aware of the Department's interpretations of its test procedures. The database is available here. The database -- which is searchable by product category -- is designed to enable manufacturers, trade associations, and all other interested members

50

DOE Launches Public Test Procedure Guidance Website | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Public Test Procedure Guidance Website Public Test Procedure Guidance Website DOE Launches Public Test Procedure Guidance Website July 22, 2010 - 4:14pm Addthis The Department of Energy this week launched a new online database offering guidance on the Department's test procedures for appliances and commercial equipment. The new database will provide a publicly accessible forum for anyone with questions about -- or needing clarification of -- DOE's test procedures. This new online resource will also ensure that all manufacturers and members of the public are equally and immediately aware of the Department's interpretations of its test procedures. The database is available here. The database -- which is searchable by product category -- is designed to enable manufacturers, trade associations, and all other interested members

51

DOE Approves Field Test for Promising Carbon Capture Technology |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Approves Field Test for Promising Carbon Capture Technology Approves Field Test for Promising Carbon Capture Technology DOE Approves Field Test for Promising Carbon Capture Technology November 20, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - A promising post combustion membrane technology that can separate and capture 90 percent of the carbon dioxide (CO2) from a pulverized coal plant has been successfully demonstrated and received Department of Energy (DOE) approval to advance to a larger-scale field test. In an $18.75 million project funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Membrane Technology and Research Inc. (MTR) and its partners tested the Polaris™ membrane system, which uses a CO2-selective polymeric membrane (micro-porous films which act as semi-permeable barriers to separate two different mediums) material and

52

DOEs New Large Blade Test Facility in Massachusetts Completes First Commercial Blade Tests  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Since opening its doors for business in May, the Wind Technology Testing Center (WTTC), in Boston, Massachusetts, has come up to full speed testing the long wind turbine blades produced for today's larger wind turbines.

53

Flow Test At Hot Pot Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At Hot Pot Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At Hot Pot Area (DOE GTP) Exploration Activity...

54

Flow Test At Snake River Plain Region (DOE GTP) | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At Snake River Plain Region (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At Snake River Plain Region (DOE GTP)...

55

Flow Test At New River Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At New River Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At New River Area (DOE GTP) Exploration Activity...

56

Flow Test At Gabbs Valley Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At Gabbs Valley Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At Gabbs Valley Area (DOE GTP) Exploration...

57

Flow Test At Mcgee Mountain Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At Mcgee Mountain Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At Mcgee Mountain Area (DOE GTP) Exploration...

58

Flow Test At San Emidio Desert Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Informatio...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At San Emidio Desert Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At San Emidio Desert Area (DOE GTP)...

59

Flow Test At Black Warrior Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At Black Warrior Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At Black Warrior Area (DOE GTP) Exploration...

60

Flow Test At Glass Buttes Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At Glass Buttes Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At Glass Buttes Area (DOE GTP) Exploration...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Flow Test At Rye Patch Area (DOE GTP, 2011) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At Rye Patch Area (DOE GTP, 2011) Exploration Activity Details Location Rye Patch Area Exploration Technique Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding...

62

DOE Partner Begins Carbon Storage Test | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Partner Begins Carbon Storage Test Partner Begins Carbon Storage Test DOE Partner Begins Carbon Storage Test June 25, 2009 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -- A Department of Energy sponsored project in Hopkins County, Kentucky has begun injecting carbon dioxide (CO2) into a mature oil field to assess the region's CO2 storage capacity and feasibility for enhanced oil recovery. The project is part of DOE's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (RCSP) program and is being conducted by The Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium (MGSC). The project is part of the RCSP's "validation phase," where field tests are being conducted nationwide to assess the most promising sites to deploy carbon capture and storage technologies. This project is expected to create 13 full time jobs which will be

63

News Release: DOE to Conduct Additional Groundwater Tests at Riverton  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

to Conduct Additional Groundwater Tests at to Conduct Additional Groundwater Tests at Riverton UMTRCA Site News Release: DOE to Conduct Additional Groundwater Tests at Riverton UMTRCA Site July 30, 2012 - 11:08am Addthis News Contact: Contractor, Judy Miller, S.M. Stoller Corporation Public Affairs (970) 248-6363 jmiller@lm.doe.gov Tests will indicate progress of current groundwater remediation strategy The U.S. Department of Energy will conduct additional characterization work at the Riverton, WY, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Site this summer, including extensive groundwater and soil sampling. The Department will use the sampling results to update the site conceptual model and to develop a revised groundwater flow and transport model to more accurately simulate natural flushing processes.

64

ISOTOPIC MODEL FOR COMMERCIAL SNF BURNUP CREDIT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to demonstrate a process for selecting bounding depletion parameters, show that they are conservative for pressurized water reactor (PWR) and boiling water reactor (BWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF), and establish the range of burnup for which the parameters are conservative. The general range of applicability is for commercial light water reactor (LWR) SNF with initial enrichments between 2.0 and 5.0 weight percent {sup 235}U and burnups between 10 and 50 gigawatt-day per metric ton of uranium (GWd/MTU).

A.H. Wells

2004-11-17T23:59:59.000Z

65

SNF project engineering process improvement plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Engineering Process Improvement Plan documents the activities and plans to be taken by the SNF Project to support its engineering process and to produce a consolidated set of engineering procedures that are fully compliant with the requirements of HNF-PRO-1819. All new procedures will be issued and implemented by September 30, 1999.

DESAI, S.P.

1999-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

66

Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project Execution Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project supports the Hanford Site Mission to cleanup the Site by providing safe, economic, environmentally sound management of Site spent nuclear fuel in a manner that reduces hazards by staging it to interim onsite storage and deactivates the 100 K Area facilities.

LEROY, P.G.

2000-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

67

NETL: News Release - DOE Announces Further Field Testing of Advanced  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Announces Further Field Testing of Advanced Mercury Control Technologies DOE Announces Further Field Testing of Advanced Mercury Control Technologies Six Projects Selected in Round 2 to Address Future Power Plant Mercury Reduction Initiatives PITTSBURGH, PA - With an eye on future federal regulations aimed at reducing mercury emissions, the U.S. Department of Energy has selected six additional projects as part of a DOE research program to advance the technical readiness of mercury control options for the Nation's fleet of coal-fired power plants. The six projects in this second round of awards build on last year's selection of eight projects, and will verify technology performance, evaluate costs, and assess balance-of-plant impacts. The projects will field test advanced, post-combustion technologies involving all coal types at utilities using pulverized coal or cyclone-boiler configurations, and focus on technologies capable of removing mercury from flue gas containing higher concentrations of elemental mercury. The technologies include sorbent injection, wet flue gas desulfurization systems enhancement, and combustion optimization.

68

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Trinity Test Site - NM 17  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Trinity Test Site - NM 17 Trinity Test Site - NM 17 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TRINITY TEST SITE (NM.17 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - U.S. Army controls site Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: missile range - 30 miles west of Carrizozo , White Sands , New Mexico NM.17-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 NM.17-1 Site Operations: Detonation of the first atomic bomb occurred at this site. NM.17-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated NM.17-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Fission fragments NM.17-1 Radiological Survey(s): NM.17-1 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - U.S. Army controls site NM.17-1 Also see Documents Related to TRINITY TEST SITE NM.17-1 - DOE Memorandum/Checklist; Jones to File; Subject:

69

How Does Your Fuel Economy Compare to the Test Ratings on Fueleconomy...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Does Your Fuel Economy Compare to the Test Ratings on Fueleconomy.gov? How Does Your Fuel Economy Compare to the Test Ratings on Fueleconomy.gov? November 12, 2009 - 8:36am Addthis...

70

NETL: News Release - Regional Partner Launches Drilling Test in DOE's  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

August 30, 2007 August 30, 2007 Regional Partner Launches Drilling Test in DOE's Carbon Sequestration Program Project Focuses on Greenhouse Gas Storage in Lignite Seam, Methane Gas Recovery MORGANTOWN, WV - As an integral part of the U.S. Department of Energy's effort to develop carbon sequestration technologies to capture and permanently store greenhouse gases, the Plains CO2 Reduction (PCOR) Partnership has begun drilling operations to determine the suitability of a North Dakota lignite coal seam to simultaneously sequester the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide and produce valuable coalbed methane. The PCOR Partnership-one of seven partnerships in the Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Program, which is managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory-plans to inject at least 400 tons of CO2 to a depth of approximately 1,200 feet into an unminable lignite seam in Burke County, ND.

71

DOE Hosts Solid-State Lighting Commercial Product Testing Program Workshop  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) hosted a workshop on October 27, 2006, to introduce the DOE SSL Commercial Product Testing Program. The workshop, held in Washington, D.C., drew over 40...

72

Memorandum, Drug Testing at DOE - September 14, 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Memorandum, Drug Testing at DOE - September 14, 2007 Memorandum, Drug Testing at DOE - September 14, 2007 Memorandum, Drug Testing at DOE - September 14, 2007 As established in his memorandum dated September 14, 2007, the Secretary has determined that applicants for, and holders of, a Department of Energy (DOE) Q or L access authorization (security clearance) will be in Testing Designated Positions (TDP) as specified in DOE Order 3792.3, Drug-Free Federal Workplace Testing Implementation Program, for Federal employees, and Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 707, Workplace Substance Abuse Programs at DOE Sites, for contractor employees. Accordingly, individuals who are either in, or are selected for, a TDP are subject to applicant, random and for cause testing. Additionally, the Secretary has determined individuals who have used illegal drugs within 12

73

SNF project engineering process improvement plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Engineering Process Improvement Plan documents the activities and plans to be taken by the SNF Project (the Project) to support its engineering process and to produce a consolidated set of engineering procedures that are fully compliant with the requirements of HNF-PRO-1819 (1819). These requirements are imposed on all engineering activities performed for the Project and apply to all life-cycle stages of the Project's systems, structures and components (SSCs). This Plan describes the steps that will be taken by the Project during the transition period to ensure that new procedures are effectively integrated into the Project's work process as these procedures are issued. The consolidated procedures will be issued and implemented by September 30, 1999.

KELMENSON, R.L.

1999-05-24T23:59:59.000Z

74

The Spectrum of SnF  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Measurements of the absorption bands of SnF are reported for the first time. Analysis of the frequencies of the band heads shows the presence of four doublet systems, all due to transitions from a doublet normal state X, of separation 2317.3 cm-1. The various states are as follows: State??exe?eProbable typeX0.0582.92.69?22317.3587.62.65A34,108.4676.72.65?2B40,834594-?2C44,161.6688.24.65?245,498.9688.24.65D46,326598-?246,427607-E?41,000---F?53,000--- The transitions E?X and F?X give continua. The second component of B?X is probably masked by E?X. Resolution of the Sn isotope effect is observed for the first time. A carbon tube furnace for studying absorption spectra is described.

F. A. Jenkins and George D. Rochester

1937-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

75

Flow Test At Mccoy Geothermal Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Flow Test At Mccoy Geothermal Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration...

76

Flow Test At Jemez Pueblo Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GTP) Exploration Activity Details Location Jemez Pueblo Area Exploration Technique Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011)...

77

Flow Test At Crump's Hot Springs Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Details Location Crump's Hot Springs Geothermal Area Exploration Technique Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011)...

78

Flow Test At The Needles Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At The Needles Area (DOE GTP) Exploration Activity Details Location The Needles Area...

79

Flow Test At Fort Bliss Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At Fort Bliss Area (DOE GTP) Exploration Activity Details Location Fort Bliss Area...

80

Flow Test At Silver Peak Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011) GTP ARRA Spreadsheet Additional References Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Flow Test At Fish Lake Valley Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011) GTP ARRA Spreadsheet Additional References Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

82

Flow Test At Newberry Caldera Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Exploration Activity Details Location Newberry Caldera Area Exploration Technique Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011)...

83

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Tatum Salt Dome Test Site...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Tatum Salt Dome Test Site - MS 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Tatum Salt Dome Test Site (MS.01) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site...

84

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Geothermal Test Facility...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Geothermal Test Facility - 001 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Geothermal Test Facility (001) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site...

85

Comments on DOE's Verification Testing in Support of ENERGY STAR® Draft  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Comments on DOE's Verification Testing in Support of ENERGY STAR® Comments on DOE's Verification Testing in Support of ENERGY STAR® Draft Process Document Comments on DOE's Verification Testing in Support of ENERGY STAR® Draft Process Document On April 22, 2011, The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released a draft of DOE's Verification Testing in Support of ENERGY STAR Process Plan for 2011. DOE accepted comments through May 9, 2011 and they are displayed below. Company/Organization Consumers Union Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) Air Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) A. O. Smith Corporation Alliance for Water Efficiency (AWE) Bradford White Corporation (BWC) BSH Home Appliances Corporation CertainTeed Corporation Traulsen InterMetro Industries Corp. Hoshizaki America, Inc. Earthjustice

86

DOE-Idaho's Packaging and Transportation Perspective  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Idaho's Packaging and Idaho's Packaging and T t ti P ti Transportation Perspective Richard Provencher Manager DOE Idaho Operations Office DOE Idaho Operations Office Presented to the DOE National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Stakeholders Forum May 12, 2011 DOE's Idaho site ships and receives a wide variety of radioactive materials 2 Engineering Test Reactor vessel excavated, transported across the site and disposed 3 Navy SNF moved from wet to dry storage storage 4 5 Left: Contact-handled TRU shipments Right: A remote-handled TRU shipment Right: A remote handled TRU shipment 6 NAC spent nuclear fuel container on its trailer, prior to installation of its impact limiters 7 Examples of dry (CPP-603) and wet (CPP-666) storage in Idaho (CPP 666) storage in Idaho 8 INL's Materials and Fuels Complex Hot Fuel Examination

87

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nevada Test Site - 023  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Nevada Test Site - 023 Nevada Test Site - 023 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Nevada Test Site (023) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Nevada Test Site was established by the Atomic Energy Commission in the 1950's to conduct field testing of nuclear explosives in connection with the research and development of nuclear weapons. The environmental management activities for this site are under the purview of the Department of Energy¿s Nevada Operations Office. The National Nuclear Security Administration is the site landlord and will be responsible for Long Term Stewardship. Also see Documents Related to Nevada Test Site

88

Flow Test At Pilgrim Hot Springs Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Area (DOE GTP) Area (DOE GTP) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Flow Test At Pilgrim Hot Springs Area (DOE GTP) Exploration Activity Details Location Pilgrim Hot Springs Area Exploration Technique Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011) GTP ARRA Spreadsheet Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Flow_Test_At_Pilgrim_Hot_Springs_Area_(DOE_GTP)&oldid=402456" Categories: Exploration Activities DOE Funded Activities ARRA Funded Activities What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Browse properties 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation: XID: 1863028959 Varnish cache server

89

Matrix, Drug Testing for DOE Security Clearance- September 1, 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The following matrix identifies those individuals required to have a current negative drug test as a prerequisite for being processed for a security clearance

90

Sandia National Laboratories: Joint Sandia-DOE-HMRC Testing of...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Exhibition (EU PVSC) EC Top Publications Reference Model 5 (RM5): Oscillating Surge Wave Energy Converter Experimental Wave Tank Test for Reference Model 3 Floating- Point...

91

DOE Cell Component Accelerated Stress Test Protocols for PEM...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CELL COMPONENT ACCELERATED STRESS TEST PROTOCOLS FOR PEM FUEL CELLS (Electrocatalysts, Supports, Membranes, and Membrane Electrode Assemblies) March 2007 Fuel cells, especially for...

92

major-test-partners | netl.doe.gov  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

major-test-partners News Gasifipedia Coal-Biomass Feed Advanced Fuels Synthesis Systems Analyses International Activity Project Information Project Portfolio Publications...

93

DOE National SCADA Test Bed Program Multi-Year Plan | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National SCADA Test Bed Program Multi-Year Plan National SCADA Test Bed Program Multi-Year Plan DOE National SCADA Test Bed Program Multi-Year Plan This document presents the National SCADA Test Bed Program Multi-Year Plan, a coherent strategy for improving the cyber security of control systems in the energy sector. The NSTB Program is conducted within DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE), which leads national efforts to modernize the electric grid, enhance the security and reliability of the energy infrastructure, and facilitate recovery from disruptions to the energy supply. The Plan covers the planning period of fiscal year 2008 to 2013. DOE National SCADA Test Bed Program Multi-Year Plan More Documents & Publications DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan

94

Experimental Test Plan DOE Tidal and River Reference Turbines  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Our aim is to provide details of the experimental test plan for scaled model studies in St. Anthony Falls Laboratory (SAFL) Main Channel at the University of Minnesota, including a review of study objectives, descriptions of the turbine models, the experimental set-up, instrumentation details, instrument measurement uncertainty, anticipated experimental test cases, post-processing methods, and data archiving for model developers.

Neary, Vincent S [ORNL; Hill, Craig [St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, 2 Third Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414; Chamorro, Leonardo [St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, 2 Third Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414; Gunawan, Budi [ORNL

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

95

U.S. DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Supports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Supports U.S. DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Supports U.S. DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Supports To help advance the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National SCADA Test Bed's (NSTB) efforts to enhance control system security in the energy sector, DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) recently awarded a total of nearly $8 million to fund five industry-led projects: Hallmark Project. (PDF 789 KB) Will commercialize the Secure SCADA Communications Protocol (SSCP), which marks SCADA messages with a unique identifier that must be authenticated before the function is carried out, ensuring message integrity. (Lead: Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories; Partners: Pacific Northwest National Laboratories, CenterPoint Energy) Detection and Analysis of Threats to the Energy Sector (DATES) (PDF

96

DOE Targets Rural Indiana Geologic Formation for CO2 Storage Field Test |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Targets Rural Indiana Geologic Formation for CO2 Storage Field DOE Targets Rural Indiana Geologic Formation for CO2 Storage Field Test DOE Targets Rural Indiana Geologic Formation for CO2 Storage Field Test November 12, 2009 - 12:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - A U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) team of regional partners has begun injecting 8,000 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) to evaluate the carbon storage potential and test the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) potential of the Mississippian-aged Clore Formation in Posey County, Ind. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is seen as a key technology for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and helping to mitigate climate change. The injection, which is expected to last 6-8 months, is an integral step in DOE's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership program. The Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) is conducting the field test to

97

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shoal Test Site - NV 03  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Shoal Test Site - NV 03 Shoal Test Site - NV 03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SHOAL TEST SITE (NV.03 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Sand Springs Range NV.03-1 Location: Near U.S. Highway 50 , Fallon , Nevada NV.03-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 NV.03-2 Site Operations: Underground nuclear detonation site. NV.03-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NV.03-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None at the Surface and Fission Fragments Within the Subsurface NV.03-1 Radiological Survey(s): Yes Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to SHOAL TEST SITE NV.03-1 - Report (NVO-1229-105 Part I); Evaluation of the Project

98

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Central Nevada Test Site...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Testing In and Chemical Analyses of Water Samples from Deep Exploratory Holes In Little Fish Lake, Monitor, Hot Creek, and Little Smoky Valleys, Nevada. USGS-474-90. 1971 Water...

99

New Diabetes Testing Technology | netl.doe.gov  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

New Diabetes Testing Technology Sep 2014 Aug 2014 Jul 2014 June 2014 May 2014 Apr 2014 Mar 2014 Feb 2014 Jan 2014 Dec 2013 Nov 2013 Oct 2013 Sep 2013 Aug 2013 Jul 2013 Jun 2013 May...

100

DOE Testing Finds Two Kenmore-Brand Freezers Noncompliant | Department of  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Testing Finds Two Kenmore-Brand Freezers Noncompliant Testing Finds Two Kenmore-Brand Freezers Noncompliant DOE Testing Finds Two Kenmore-Brand Freezers Noncompliant August 13, 2012 - 1:53pm Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy's ("DOE") Office of Enforcement recently issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Sears, Roebuck & Co. ("Sears") regarding two Kenmore-brand chest freezers, basic model 255.19502010 ("19502" or "1950") and basic model 255.19702010 ("19702" or "1970"), which are privately labeled and distributed in commerce in the U.S. by Sears and manufactured in China. In late 2011 and early 2012, DOE tested four units of basic model 19702 and four units of basic model 19502. DOE's testing demonstrated that neither basic model is in compliance with federal law. Basic model 19702

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

How Does Your Fuel Economy Compare to the Test Ratings on Fueleconomy.gov?  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

How Does Your Fuel Economy Compare to the Test Ratings on How Does Your Fuel Economy Compare to the Test Ratings on Fueleconomy.gov? How Does Your Fuel Economy Compare to the Test Ratings on Fueleconomy.gov? November 12, 2009 - 8:36am Addthis On Monday, you read about the resources on Fueleconomy.gov and how they can help you compare the fuel economy of vehicles. Fueleconomy.gov also offers a tool called Your MPG, where you can track your own fuel economy and compare it to that of other users and to the test ratings. Many factors affect your mileage, and you may see different numbers than those list on Fueleconomy.gov. Whether you are using Your MPG or just keeping track on your own: How does your fuel economy compare to the test ratings on Fueleconomy.gov? Each Thursday, you have the chance to share your thoughts on a question

102

DOE-HDBK-1204-97; Guide to Good Practices for the Development of Test Items  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-97 4-97 January 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1009-92 July 1992 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEST ITEMS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE97000786 DOE-HDBK-1204-97 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE

103

Novel Sorbent Achieves 90 Percent Carbon Capture in DOE-Sponsored Test |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sorbent Achieves 90 Percent Carbon Capture in DOE-Sponsored Sorbent Achieves 90 Percent Carbon Capture in DOE-Sponsored Test Novel Sorbent Achieves 90 Percent Carbon Capture in DOE-Sponsored Test August 21, 2012 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - The successful bench-scale test of a novel carbon dioxide (CO2) capturing sorbent promises to further advance the process as a possible technological option for reducing CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants. The new sorbent, BrightBlack™, was originally developed for a different application by Advanced Technology Materials Inc. (ATMI) , a subcontractor to SRI for the Department of Energy (DOE)-sponsored test at the University of Toledo. Through partnering with the Office of Fossil Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and others, SRI developed a method to

104

Novel Sorbent Achieves 90 Percent Carbon Capture in DOE-Sponsored Test |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Novel Sorbent Achieves 90 Percent Carbon Capture in DOE-Sponsored Novel Sorbent Achieves 90 Percent Carbon Capture in DOE-Sponsored Test Novel Sorbent Achieves 90 Percent Carbon Capture in DOE-Sponsored Test August 21, 2012 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - The successful bench-scale test of a novel carbon dioxide (CO2) capturing sorbent promises to further advance the process as a possible technological option for reducing CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants. The new sorbent, BrightBlack™, was originally developed for a different application by Advanced Technology Materials Inc. (ATMI) , a subcontractor to SRI for the Department of Energy (DOE)-sponsored test at the University of Toledo. Through partnering with the Office of Fossil Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and others, SRI developed a method to

105

DOE Issues Test Procedure Final Rule & Publishes Energy Conservation Standards NOPR for Electric Motors  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy (DOE) has issued a pre-publication Federal Register final rule regarding test procedures and published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) regarding energy conservation standards for electric motors.

106

NRC Transportation Security (Part 73 SNF Update and Part 37 Category...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

NRC Transportation Security (Part 73 SNF Update and Part 37 Category 1 and 2 Materials) NRC Transportation Security (Part 73 SNF Update and Part 37 Category 1 and 2 Materials) NRC...

107

DOE-Sponsored Field Test Finds Potential for Permanent Storage of CO2 in  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Field Test Finds Potential for Permanent Storage of Field Test Finds Potential for Permanent Storage of CO2 in Lignite Seams DOE-Sponsored Field Test Finds Potential for Permanent Storage of CO2 in Lignite Seams November 4, 2010 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - A field test sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has demonstrated that opportunities to permanently store carbon in unmineable seams of lignite may be more widespread than previously documented. This finding supports national efforts to address climate change through long-term storage of CO2 in underground geologic reservoirs. Lowering the core barrel at the PCOR Partnership lignite site.The PCOR Partnership, one of seven partnerships in DOE's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Program, collaborated with Eagle Operating Inc. (Kenmare, N.D.) to complete the field test in Burke County, N.D. In March

108

DOE-Sponsored Field Test Demonstrates Viability of Simultaneous CO2 Storage  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Field Test Demonstrates Viability of Simultaneous CO2 Field Test Demonstrates Viability of Simultaneous CO2 Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbonate Reservoirs DOE-Sponsored Field Test Demonstrates Viability of Simultaneous CO2 Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbonate Reservoirs June 28, 2010 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - A field test conducted by a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) team of regional partners has demonstrated that using carbon dioxide (CO2) in an enhanced oil recovery method dubbed "huff-and-puff" can help assess the carbon sequestration potential of geologic formations while tapping America's valuable oil resources. The Plains CO2 Reduction (PCOR) Partnership, one of seven in DOE's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership program, collaborated with Eagle Operating Inc. to complete the test in the Northwest McGregor Oil Field in Williams

109

DOE/RMOTC/05.98001 Hydro-Balanced Stuffing Box Field Test Field Test Project Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

RMOTC/05.98001 RMOTC/05.98001 Hydro-Balanced Stuffing Box Field Test Field Test Project Report Date Published: May 28, 1999 Leo A. Giangiacomo, P.E. Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center 907 N. Poplar, Suite 150 Casper, WY 82601 Distribution A. Approved for public release; Further dissemination unlimited. (Unclassified Unlimited) DOE/RMOTC/05.98001 Hydro-Balanced Stuffing Box Field Test Test Project Report Test Project Report Test Project Report Test Project Report Date Published: May 28, 1999 Leo A. Giangiacomo, P.E. PREPARED FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ROCKY MOUNTAIN OILFIELD TESTING CENTER 907 N. Poplar, Suite 150 Casper, WY 82601 Work Performed Under RMOTC ERIP Funding Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States

110

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE HDBK 1203, 1204, 1205, 1206: Guides to Good Practices for Training, Tests, and On-the-Job Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HDBK-1203-97 HDBK-1203-97 GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING OF TECHNICAL STAFF AND MANAGERS DOE-HDBK-1204-97 GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEST ITEMS DOE-HDBK-1205-97 GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF EXAMINATIONS DOE-HDBK-1206-98 GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR ON-THE-JOB TRAINING DOE-HDBK-1203-97, 1204-97, 1205-97, and 1206-98 Familiar Level August 2011 1 DOE-HDBK-1203-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING OF TECHNICAL STAFF AND MANAGERS; DOE-HDBK-1204-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEST ITEMS; DOE-HDBK-1205-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF EXAMINATIONS; AND DOE-HDBK-1206-98, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR ON-THE-JOB TRAINING FAMILIAR LEVEL

111

DOE to Build Hydrogen Fuel Test Facility at West Virginia Airport |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE to Build Hydrogen Fuel Test Facility at West Virginia Airport DOE to Build Hydrogen Fuel Test Facility at West Virginia Airport DOE to Build Hydrogen Fuel Test Facility at West Virginia Airport March 25, 2009 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - The Office of Fossil Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) today announced plans to construct and operate a hydrogen fuel production plant and vehicle fueling station at the Yeager Airport in Charleston, W.Va. The facility will use grid electricity to split water to produce pure hydrogen fuel. The fuel will be used by the airport's operations and the 130th Air Wing of the West Virginia Air National Guard. NETL will begin operations at the Yeager Airport facility in August 2009 and plans to conduct two years of testing and evaluation. The facility will be designed using "open architecture," allowing the capability to add

112

Issues related to EM management of DOE spent nuclear fuel  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a summary of the important issues involved in managing spent nuclear fuel (SNF) owned by the Department of Energy (DOE). Issues related to civilian SNF activities are not discussed. DOE-owned SNF is stored primarily at the Hanford Site, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), Savannah River Site (SRS), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and West Valley Demonstration Project. Smaller quantities of SNF are stored at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). There is a wide variety of fuel types, including both low and high enrichment fuels from weapons production, DOE reactors, research and development programs, naval programs, and universities. Most fuel is stored in pools associated with reactor or reprocessing facilities. Smaller quantities are in dry storage. Physical conditions of the fuel range from excellent to poor or severely damaged. An issue is defined as an important question that must be answered or decision that must be made on a topic or subject relevant to achieving the complimentary objectives of (a) storing SNF in compliance with applicable regulations and orders until it can be disposed, and (b) safely disposing of DOE`s SNF. The purpose of this document is to define the issues; no recommendations are made on resolutions. As DOE`s national SNF management program is implemented, a system of issues identification, documentation, tracking, and resolution will be implemented. This document is an initial effort at issues identification. The first section of this document is an overview of issues that are common to several or all DOE facilities that manage SNF. The common issues are organized according to specific aspects of spent fuel management. This is followed by discussions of management issues that apply specifically to individual DOE facilities. The last section provides literature references.

Abbott, D.G. [EG& G Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Abashian, M.S.; Chakraborti, S.; Roberson, K.; Meloin, J.M. [IT Corp. (United States)

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Notes from DOE/EPRI Meeting on Phase II Mercury Field Test Needs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Notes Notes DOE/EPRI meeting on Phase II Mercury Field Test Needs Washington DC June 5, 2002 Attendees (phone/e-mail at end of notes) AEP - Gary Spitznogle EPRI - Stu Dalton DOE - Scott Renninger EPRI - George Offen DOE - Tom Feeley GRE - Mark Strohfus Duke - Tim Shawver Southern - Larry Monroe EPA - Jim Kilgroe TVA - Tom Burnett TXU - David Lamb DOE and EPRI jointly convened this meeting to obtain feedback from deeply involved industry members on the needs, scope, schedule, etc. for a second phase of full-scale, longer-term field tests of mercury controls on power plants. The program objectives would be to determine performance and costs of the major near-term control approaches with the hope of using this information both to inform the regulatory (MACT) and legislative (Clear Skies Initiative, CSI) processes as well as industry selections of

114

Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Bounding Drop Support Calculations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report evaluates different drop heights, concrete and other impact media to which the transport package and/or the MCO is dropped. A prediction method is derived for estimating the resultant impact factor for determining the bounding drop case for the SNF Project.

CHENAULT, D.M.

1999-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

115

Does  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Does Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Yu-San Liu Æ Yining Zeng Æ Yonghua Luo Æ Qi Xu Æ Michael E. Himmel Æ Steve J. Smith Æ Shi-You Ding Received: 26 November 2008 / Accepted: 11 May 2009 / Published online: 19 June 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Exoglucanases are key enzymes required for the efficient hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. It has been proposed that exoglucanases hydrolyze cellulose chains in a processive manner to produce primarily cellobiose. Usually, two functional modules are involved in the processive mechanism: a catalytic module and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). In this report, single molecule tracking techniques were used to analyze the molecular motion of CBMs labeled with quantum dots (QDs) and bound to cellulose crystals. By tracking the single QD, we observed that the family 2 CBM from

116

DOE/EA-1557; Final Envrionmental Assessment for the National Security Test Range  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Assessment for the National Security Test Range DOE/EA-1557 April, 2007 CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 2. ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.1. Consolidate Testing on a New National Security Test Range at the INL (Preferred Alternative)3 2.1.1 Construction Activities ................................................................................................. 6 2.1.2 Operational Activities................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Alternatives Considered, but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis................................................

117

Assessment of Disposal Options for DOE-Managed High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Assessment of Disposal Options for DOE-Managed High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel report assesses the technical options for the safe and permanent disposal of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) and spent nuclear fuel (SNF) managed by the Department of Energy. Specifically, it considers whether DOE-managed HLW and SNF should be disposed of with commercial SNF and HLW in one geologic repository or whether there are advantages to developing separate geologic disposal pathways for some DOE-managed HLW and SNF. The report recommends that the Department begin implementation of a phased, adaptive, and consent-based strategy with development of a separate mined repository for some DOE-managed HLW and cooler DOE-managed SNF.

118

DOE Releases Data Summary Report for Groundwater and Soil Tests Conducted  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Releases Data Summary Report for Groundwater and Soil Tests Releases Data Summary Report for Groundwater and Soil Tests Conducted at the Riverton UMTRCA Site DOE Releases Data Summary Report for Groundwater and Soil Tests Conducted at the Riverton UMTRCA Site February 19, 2013 - 12:53pm Addthis Contractor, Judy Miller, S.M. Stoller Corporation Public Affairs, (970) 248-6363, jmiller@lm.doe.gov GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. - The U.S. Department of Energy today announced the availability of a Data Summary Report of enhanced characterization fieldwork conducted in August 2012 at the Riverton, Wyoming, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Site. "The Department will use the data to assess why levels of groundwater contamination in monitoring wells increased after the 2010 historic flood event of the Little Wind River," said Bill Dam, DOE Riverton site

119

DOE  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

DOE DOE /E/A- 0202( 83//Q J Sh or t-T er m En er gy O ut lo ok a to m Quar terly Proje ction s Febru ary 1983 Ene rgy Info rma tion Adm inist ratio n Was hing ton, D.C. t rt jrt .or t lor t lor t .lor t- ior t- ior t <.o rt ort . m .er m -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -T erm -T erm -T erm Nrm ue rgy En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y ^n erg y Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Sh ort -T erm 1 Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm

120

DOE/EA-1652: Final Environmental Assessment Wind Technology Testing Center (August 2009)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Wind Technology Testing Center Boston, Massachusetts August 2009 DOE/EA-1652 Department of Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, CO 80401-3393 NREL - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE WIND TECHNOLOGY TESTING CENTER, BOSTON, M.A. FINAL EA, AUGUST 2009 i Table of Contents SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. S-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT AND RELATED PROCEDURES ................................ 1 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED ....................................................................................................................... 2

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Summary of Preliminary Criticality Analysis for Peach Bottom Fuel in the DOE Standardized Spent Nuclear Fuel Canister  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy's (DOE's) National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program is developing a standardized set of canisters for DOE spent nuclear fuel (SNF). These canisters will be used for DOE SNF handling, interim storage, transportation, and disposal in the national repository. Several fuels are being examined in conjunction with the DOE SNF canisters. This report summarizes the preliminary criticality safety analysis that addresses general fissile loading limits for Peach Bottom graphite fuel in the DOE SNF canister. The canister is considered both alone and inside the 5-HLW/DOE Long Spent Fuel Co-disposal Waste Package, and in intact and degraded conditions. Results are appropriate for a single DOE SNF canister. Specific facilities, equipment, canister internal structures, and scenarios for handling, storage, and transportation have not yet been defined and are not evaluated in this analysis. The analysis assumes that the DOE SNF canister is designed so that it maintains reasonable geometric integrity. Parameters important to the results are the canister outer diameter, inner diameter, and wall thickness. These parameters are assumed to have nominal dimensions of 45.7-cm (18.0-in.), 43.815-cm (17.25-in), and 0.953-cm (0.375-in.), respectively. Based on the analysis results, the recommended fissile loading for the DOE SNF canister is 13 Peach Bottom fuel elements if no internal steel is present, and 15 Peach Bottom fuel elements if credit is taken for internal steel.

Henrikson, D.J.

1999-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

122

Preliminary Criticality Analysis of Degraded SNF Accumulations to a Waste Package (SCPB: N/A)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This study is prepared by the Mined Geologic Disposal System (MGDS) Waste Package Development Department (WPDD) to provide input to a separate evaluation on the probability of criticality in the far-field environment. These calculations are performed in sufficient detail to provide conservatively bounding configurations to support separate probabilistic analyses. The objective of this evaluation is to provide input to a risk analysis which will show that criticalities involving commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) are not credible, or indicate additional measures that are required for the Engineered Barrier Segment (EBS) to make such events incredible. Minimum critical volumes and masses of UO{sub 2}/H{sub 2}O/tuff mixtures are determined without application of regulatory safety limits. This study does not address or demonstrate compliance with regulatory limits.

J.W. Davis

2005-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

123

SNF fuel retrieval sub project safety analysis document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This safety analysis is for the SNF Fuel Retrieval (FRS) Sub Project. The FRS equipment will be added to K West and K East Basins to facilitate retrieval, cleaning and repackaging the spent nuclear fuel into Multi-Canister Overpack baskets. The document includes a hazard evaluation, identifies bounding accidents, documents analyses of the accidents and establishes safety class or safety significant equipment to mitigate accidents as needed.

BERGMANN, D.W.

1999-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

124

CERCLA Preliminary Assessment of DOE'S Nevada Operations Office Nuclear Weapons Testing  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

tudies/B ackground tudies/B ackground Book 1 CERCLA Preliminary Assessment of DOE'S Nevada Operations Office Nuclear Weapons Testing Areas Vol. 11, April 1988 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. CERCLA PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF DOE'S NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE WCILEAR WEAPONS T E S r n G AREAS Prepared by Water Resources Center Desert Research Institute University of Nevada System ,Prepared for U . S . Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada under contract DE-AC08-85NV10384 A p r i l 1988 CONTENTS VOLUME I I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 11. NEVADA TEST SITE TESTING AREAS 2.1 Frenchman Flat (Area 5) 2.1.1 2.2 Yucca Flat (Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 15)

125

DOE response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed test  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed test procedure for residential clothes washers DOE response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed test procedure for residential clothes washers The intent of Part B is to use the methodology that AHAM had suggested specifically for extra-hot cycles, but to make it more broadly applicable to any temperature combination that is locked out of the Normal cycle. DOE_response_to_questions_from_AHAM.pdf More Documents & Publications Additional Guidance Regarding Application of Current Procedures for Testing Energy Consumption of Clothes Washers with Warm Rinse Cycles, Issued: June 30, 2010 Microsoft Word - CCE_Final_Rule_02-07-11 _Final Word_.docx Federal Register Vol. 76 No. 44, 12422-12505 - Energy Conservation Program:

126

DOE Verification Testing in Support of ENERGY STAR, April 22, 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Verification Testing in Support of ENERGY STAR April 22, 2011 Foreword ENERGY STAR® is a joint program of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The program has a dual focus on energy and cost savings. These goals are reached through a combination of increasing customer awareness, partnering with over 15,000 private and public sector organizations and driving widespread technological advances in energy efficiency. ENERGY STAR recognizes three paths to increased daily energy efficiency: bringing to market new energy- efficient products, constructing efficient new homes and commercial buildings and improving the efficiency of existing homes, commercial buildings and industrial facilities.

127

DOE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

lex lex 00023 L Projed Tide: u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Phase IL Determination of manium in ~water. U. Project DeKriptioD a&d LHaDea (iDdudiBg Time Period Ova- wlDdr plopasetl actioB will oceur and Projed' DimeDsioas - e.g.. acres dispJaced/distwbal,. eunatioft ~~ ek..): The objective of this project is to desi~ build, deploy and test a field deployable insttt:tm.ent that can perform near-rea1 ~ fully autonomous measurements of uranium in contaminated groundwater plmnes.. The approximate dimensions of the deployable uranium ~ are Z x 2 x 4 feet. The system periodically samples Y«1lter from existing aquifer tubes., and. the sampies are analyzed for u.ranium concentration using a colorimetric cbelation sysWn.. Analytical teSUlts are

128

Hazard Evaluation for Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Sludge at the Solid Waste Treatment Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) storage basin clean-up project, sludge that has accumulated in the K Basins due to corrosion of damaged irradiated N Reactor will be loaded into containers and placed in interim storage. The Hanford Site Treatment Complex (T Plant) has been identified as the location where the sludge will be stored until final disposition of the material occurs. Long term storage of sludge from the K Basin fuel storage facilities requires identification and analysis of potential accidents involving sludge storage in T Plant. This report is prepared as the initial step in the safety assurance process described in DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports and HNF-PRO-704, Hazards and Accident Analysis Process. This report documents the evaluation of potential hazards and off-normal events associated with sludge storage activities. This information will be used in subsequent safety analyses, design, and operations procedure development to ensure safe storage. The hazards evaluation for the storage of SNF sludge in T-Plant used the Hazards and Operability Analysis (HazOp) method. The hazard evaluation identified 42 potential hazardous conditions. No hazardous conditions involving hazardous/toxic chemical concerns were identified. Of the 42 items identified in the HazOp study, eight were determined to have potential for onsite worker consequences. No items with potential offsite consequences were identified in the HazOp study. Hazardous conditions with potential onsite worker or offsite consequences are candidates for quantitative consequence analysis. The hazardous conditions with potential onsite worker consequences were grouped into two event categories, Container failure due to overpressure - internal to T Plant, and Spill of multiple containers. The two event categories will be developed into accident scenarios that will be quantitatively analyzed to determine release consequences. A third category, Container failure due to overpressure--external to T Plant, was included for completeness but is not within the scope of the hazards evaluation. Container failures external to T Plant will be addressed as part of the transportation analysis. This document describes the HazOp analysis performed for the activities associated with the storage of SNF sludge in the T Plant.

SCHULTZ, M.V.

2000-08-22T23:59:59.000Z

129

Protons and Neutrons for Testing at LBNL | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Protons and Neutrons for Testing at Protons and Neutrons for Testing at LBNL Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Spinoff Applications Spinoff Archives SBIR/STTR Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » Spinoff Archives Protons and Neutrons for Testing at LBNL Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Application/instrumentation: Use of protons and neutrons for testing of microelectronics, optical components and nanostructures for advanced accelerators, ground and space

130

DOE response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed test procedure  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed test procedure for response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed test procedure for residential clothes washers"? (1) What exactly does the language in Part B mean and what is the intent? * The intent of Part B is to use the methodology that AHAM had suggested specifically for extra-hot cycles, but to make it more broadly applicable to any temperature combination that is locked out of the Normal cycle. * The proposed Part (B) language is meant to be consistent with GE's original suggestion in response to the NOPR. (GE, No. 15 at pp. 1-2) * When testing cycles under Part (B), manufacturers would only need to test the temperature combination that is locked out of the Normal cycle.

131

DOE Partnership Completes Successful CO2 Injection Test in the Mount Simon  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Partnership Completes Successful CO2 Injection Test in the Partnership Completes Successful CO2 Injection Test in the Mount Simon Sandstone DOE Partnership Completes Successful CO2 Injection Test in the Mount Simon Sandstone October 21, 2009 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - The Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP), one of seven partnerships in the U.S. Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program, has successfully injected 1,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the Mount Simon Sandstone, a deep saline formation that is widespread across much of the Midwest. Preliminary results indicate that the formation has good CO2 storage potential and could possibly serve as a repository for CO2 emissions captured from stationary sources in the region. Carbon capture and storage

132

NETL: News Release - DOE-Funded Acoustic Monitor Passes Key Field Test  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

March 7, 2005 March 7, 2005 DOE-Funded Acoustic Monitor Passes Key Field Test Detection System Can Help Locate Pipeline Leaks, Damage MORGANTOWN, WV - A new, lightweight device that uses natural gas itself to detect leaks in natural gas pipelines has been successfully tested on a transmission main owned and operated by Dominion Transmission Inc., in Morgantown, W.Va. The test was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and West Virginia University, which has worked with NETL for the past 2 years to advance the detection system. The device is one of a suite of technologies being developed by the Energy Department's Office of Fossil Energy to effectively and efficiently monitor the 1.3 million miles of transmission and distribution pipelines which crisscross the United States

133

Truncating mutations of hSNF5/INI1 in aggressive paediatric cancer  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... ://www.chlc.org:80/), the Stanford Human Genome Center (http://www-shgc.stanford.edu) and the Sanger Center (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/). ... hSNF5/INI1 cDNA (exon 69), exons 45 hSNF5/INI1 cDNA and the SHGC-33468 EST probes.

Isabella Versteege; Nicolas Svenet; Julian Lange; Marie-Franoise Rousseau-Merck; Peter Ambros; Rupert Handgretinger; Alain Aurias; Olivier Delattre

1998-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

134

Measurements of Fundamental Fluid Physics of SNF Storage Canisters  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

With the University of Idaho, Ohio State University and Clarksean Associates, this research program has the long-term goal to develop reliable predictive techniques for the energy, mass and momentum transfer plus chemical reactions in drying / passivation (surface oxidation) operations in the transfer and storage of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from wet to dry storage. Such techniques are needed to assist in design of future transfer and storage systems, prediction of the performance of existing and proposed systems and safety (re)evaluation of systems as necessary at later dates. Many fuel element geometries and configurations are accommodated in the storage of spent nuclear fuel. Consequently, there is no one generic fuel element / assembly, storage basket or canister and, therefore, no single generic fuel storage configuration. One can, however, identify generic flow phenomena or processes which may be present during drying or passivation in SNF canisters. The objective of the INEEL tasks was to obtain fundamental measurements of these flow processes in appropriate parameter ranges.

Condie, Keith Glenn; Mc Creery, Glenn Ernest; McEligot, Donald Marinus

2001-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

135

DOE-Supported Technology Passes Scale-Up Test Converting CO DOE-Sponsored Research Improves Gas Turbine Performance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

into Valuable Materials into Valuable Materials Publications News Release Release Date: June 17, 2013 DOE-Sponsored Research Improves Gas Turbine Performance DOE Lab Receives Award for Work on Drilling Technology An innovative airfoil manufacturing technology that promises to improve the performance of state-of-the-art gas turbines has been commercialized through research sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy. Photo courtesy of Mikro Systems, Inc. Washington, D.C. - An innovative airfoil manufacturing technology that promises to improve the performance of state-of-the-art gas turbines has been commercialized through research sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The technology - which is expected to contribute to cleaner, more reliable and affordable domestic energy production as well as creating new

136

Power Performance Testing Activities in the DOE-EPRI Turbine Verification Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of the US Department of Energy/Electric Power Research Institute (DOE-EPRI) Wind Turbine Verification Program, Global Energy Concepts (GEC) is engaged in planning and conducting power performance tests for wind turbines in Searsburg, Vermont; Glenmore, Wisconsin; Algona, Iowa; Springview, Nebraska; Kotzebue, Alaska; and Big Spring, Texas. The turbines under investigation include a 550-kW Zond Z-40 FS, a 600-kW Tacke 600e, two 750-kW Zond Z-50s, a 66-kW AOC 15/50, a 660-kW Vestas V-47, and a 1.65-MW Vestas V-66. The testing is performed in a variety of terrain types, including mountains, plains, deserts, and coastal tundra; and under a wide range of atmospheric conditions from arid to arctic. Because one goal of this testing program is to gain experience with the new International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61400-12 standard, all of the measurements are being performed in accordance with this new standard. This paper presents the status of the power performance testing at each site, the methodologies employed, test results available, and lessons learned from the application of the IEC standard. Any sources of uncertainty are discussed, and attention is given to the relative importance of each aspect of the IEC standard in terms of its contribution to the overall measurement uncertainty.

VandenBosche, J.; McCoy, T.; Rhoads, H. (Global Energy Concepts, LLC); McNiff, B. (McNiff Light Industry); Smith, B. (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

2000-09-11T23:59:59.000Z

137

DOE/MSU composite material fatigue database: Test methods, materials, and analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents a detailed analysis of the results from fatigue studies of wind turbine blade composite materials carried out at Montana State University (MSU) over the last seven years. It is intended to be used in conjunction with the DOE/MSU composite Materials Fatigue Database. The fatigue testing of composite materials requires the adaptation of standard test methods to the particular composite structure of concern. The stranded fabric E-glass reinforcement used by many blade manufacturers has required the development of several test modifications to obtain valid test data for materials with particular reinforcement details, over the required range of tensile and compressive loadings. Additionally, a novel testing approach to high frequency (100 Hz) testing for high cycle fatigue using minicoupons has been developed and validated. The database for standard coupon tests now includes over 4,100 data points for over 110 materials systems. The report analyzes the database for trends and transitions in static and fatigue behavior with various materials parameters. Parameters explored are reinforcement fabric architecture, fiber content, content of fibers oriented in the load direction, matrix material, and loading parameters (tension, compression, and reversed loading). Significant transitions from good fatigue resistance to poor fatigue resistance are evident in the range of materials currently used in many blades. A preliminary evaluation of knockdowns for selected structural details is also presented. The high frequency database provides a significant set of data for various loading conditions in the longitudinal and transverse directions of unidirectional composites out to 10{sup 8} cycles. The results are expressed in stress and strain based Goodman Diagrams suitable for design. A discussion is provided to guide the user of the database in its application to blade design.

Mandell, J.F.; Samborsky, D.D. [Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT (United States). Dept. of Chemical Engineering

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

138

Main Principles of the Perspective System of SNF Management in Russia - 13333  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

For the last several years the System of the Spent Nuclear Fuel management in Russia was seriously changed. The paper describes the main principles of the changes and the bases of the Perspective System of SNF Management in Russia. Among such the bases there are the theses with the interesting names like 'total knowledge', 'pollutant pays' and 'pay and forget'. There is also a brief description of the modern Russian SNF Management Infrastructure. And an outline of the whole System. The System which is - in case of Russia - is quite necessary to adjust SNF accumulation and to utilize the nuclear heritage. (authors)

Baryshnikov, Mikhail [Project Office for SNF Management, Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation 'ROSATOM', Bolshaya Ordynka str., 24, Moscow, 119017 (Russian Federation)] [Project Office for SNF Management, Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation 'ROSATOM', Bolshaya Ordynka str., 24, Moscow, 119017 (Russian Federation)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

Evaluation of Shortline Railroads & SNF/HLW Rail Shipment Inspections  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Evaluation of Shortline Railroads & SNF/HLW Rail Shipment Evaluation of Shortline Railroads & SNF/HLW Rail Shipment Inspections Tasked for the Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Evaluation of Shortline Railroads & SNF/HLW Rail Shipment Inspections Tasked for the Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Task: Identify Shortline Railroads Serving Nuclear Power Plants Establish Contact Information with Railroads Officials Field Review of each Railroad's Physical and Operational Infrastructure Facilitate Upgrades to Meet Safe Acceptable Standards Evaluation of Shortline Railroads & SNF/HLW Rail Shipment Inspections Tasked for the Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel More Documents & Publications TEC Meeting Summaries - February 2008 Presentations TEC Meeting Summaries - July 2007 Presentations TEC Meeting Summaries - September 2006

140

Standard Contract for Disposal of SNF and/or HRW | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

under the laws of a given state to dispose of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) andor High-Level Radioactive Waste (HRW). NewStandardContract.pdf More Documents & Publications...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

An assessment of KW Basin radionuclide activity when opening SNF canisters  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

N Reactor spent fuel is being stored in sealed canisters in the KW Basin. Some of the canisters contain damaged fuel elements. There is the potential for release of Cs 137, Kr 85, H3, and other fission products and transuranics (TRUs) when canisters are opened. Canister opening is required to select and transfer fuel elements to the 300 Area for examination as part of the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Characterization program. This report estimates the amount of radionuclides that can be released from Mark II spent nuclear fuel (SNF) canisters in KW Basin when canisters are opened for SNF fuel sampling as part of the SNF Characterization Program. The report also assesses the dose consequences of the releases and steps that can be taken to reduce the impacts of these releases.

Bergmann, D.W. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States); Mollerus, F.J.; Wray, J.L. [Mollerus Engineering Corp., Los Gatos, CA (United States)

1995-02-06T23:59:59.000Z

142

Guideline to good practices for control and calibration of measuring and test equipment (M TE) at DOE nuclear facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the Guideline to Good Practices for Control and Calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment (M TE) at DOE Nuclear Facilities is to provide contractor maintenance organizations with information that may be used for the development and implementation of a rigorously controlled maintenance program directed at controlling and calibrating M TE used for maintenance tasks at DOE nuclear facilities. This document is intended to be an example guideline for the implementation of DOE Order 4330.4A, Maintenance Management Program, Chapter II, Element 11. DOE contractors should not feel obligated to adopt all parts of this guide. Rather, they should use the information contained herein as a guide for developing an M TE program applicable to their facility.

Not Available

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

143

Guideline to good practices for control and calibration of measuring and test equipment (M&TE) at DOE nuclear facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the Guideline to Good Practices for Control and Calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE) at DOE Nuclear Facilities is to provide contractor maintenance organizations with information that may be used for the development and implementation of a rigorously controlled maintenance program directed at controlling and calibrating M&TE used for maintenance tasks at DOE nuclear facilities. This document is intended to be an example guideline for the implementation of DOE Order 4330.4A, Maintenance Management Program, Chapter II, Element 11. DOE contractors should not feel obligated to adopt all parts of this guide. Rather, they should use the information contained herein as a guide for developing an M&TE program applicable to their facility.

Not Available

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

Characterization Program Management Plan for Hanford K Basin Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) (OCRWM)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The management plan developed to characterize the K Basin spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and sludge was originally developed for Westinghouse Hanford Company and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to work together on a program to provide characterization data to support removal, conditioning, and subsequent dry storage of the SNF stored at the Hanford K Basins. The plan also addressed necessary characterization for the removal, transport, and storage of the sludge from the Hanford K Basins. This plan was revised in 1999 (i.e., Revision 2) to incorporate actions necessary to respond to the deficiencies revealed as the result of Quality Assurance surveillances and audits in 1999 with respect to the fuel characterization activities. Revision 3 to this Program Management Plan responds to a Worker Assessment resolution determined in Fical Year 2000. This revision includes an update to current organizational structures and other revisions needed to keep this management plan consistent with the current project scope. The plan continues to address both the SNF and the sludge accumulated at K Basins. Most activities for the characterization of the SNF have been completed. Data validation, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) document reviews, and OCRWM data qualification are the remaining SNF characterization activities. The transport and storage of K Basin sludge are affected by recent path forward revisions. These revisions require additional laboratory analyses of the sludge to complete the acquisition of required supporting engineering data. Hence, this revision of the management plan provides the overall work control for these remaining SNF and sludge characterization activities given the current organizational structure of the SNF Project.

BAKER, R.B.; TRIMBLE, D.J.

2000-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

145

DOE Withdraws Proposed Rulemaking (Test Procedure) and Proposed Coverage Determination (Energy Conservation Standard) for Set-Top Boxes  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy (DOE) has issued pre-publication Federal Register notices withdrawing the notice of proposed rulemaking for a test procedure for set-top boxes and the proposed coverage determination for set-top boxes and network equipment.

146

Preparation for the Recovery of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) at Andreeva Bay, North West Russia - 13309  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Andreeva Bay is located near Murmansk in the Russian Federation close to the Norwegian border. The ex-naval site was used to de-fuel nuclear-powered submarines and icebreakers during the Cold War. Approximately 22,000 fuel assemblies remain in three Dry Storage Units (DSUs) which means that Andreeva Bay has one of the largest stockpiles of highly enriched spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in the world. The high contamination and deteriorating condition of the SNF canisters has made improvements to the management of the SNF a high priority for the international community for safety, security and environmental reasons. International Donors have, since 2002, provided support to projects at Andreeva concerned with improving the management of the SNF. This long-term programme of work has been coordinated between the International Donors and responsible bodies within the Russian Federation. Options for the safe and secure management of SNF at Andreeva Bay were considered in 2004 and developed by a number of Russian Institutes with international participation. This consisted of site investigations, surveys and studies to understand the technical challenges. A principal agreement was reached that the SNF would be removed from the site altogether and transported to Russia's reprocessing facility at Mayak in the Urals. The analytical studies provided the information necessary to develop the construction plan for the site. Following design and regulatory processes, stakeholders endorsed the technical solution in April 2007. This detailed the processes, facilities and equipment required to safely remove the SNF and identified other site services and support facilities required on the site. Implementation of this strategy is now well underway with the facilities in various states of construction. Physical works have been performed to address the most urgent tasks including weather protection over one of the DSUs, installation of shielding over the cells, provision of radiation protection infrastructure and general preparation of the site for construction of the facilities for the removal of the SNF. This paper describes the development and implementation of the strategy and work to improve the safe and secure management of SNF, preparing it for retrieval and removal from Andreeva Bay. (authors)

Field, D.; McAtamney, N. [Nuvia Limited (United Kingdom)] [Nuvia Limited (United Kingdom)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

147

Extracellular Matrix-Regulated Gene Expression RequiresCooperation of SWI/SNF and Transcription Factors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Extracellular cues play crucial roles in the transcriptional regulation of tissue-specific genes, but whether and how these signals lead to chromatin remodeling is not understood and subject to debate. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays and mammary-specific genes as models, we show here that extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules and prolactin cooperate to induce histone acetylation and binding of transcription factors and the SWI/SNF complex to the {beta}- and ?-casein promoters. Introduction of a dominant negative Brg1, an ATPase subunit of SWI/SNF complex, significantly reduced both {beta}- and ?-casein expression, suggesting that SWI/SNF-dependent chromatin remodeling is required for transcription of mammary-specific genes. ChIP analyses demonstrated that the ATPase activity of SWI/SNF is necessary for recruitment of RNA transcriptional machinery, but not for binding of transcription factors or for histone acetylation. Coimmunoprecipitation analyses showed that the SWI/SNF complex is associated with STAT5, C/EBP{beta}, and glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Thus, ECM- and prolactin-regulated transcription of the mammary-specific casein genes requires the concerted action of chromatin remodeling enzymes and transcription factors.

Xu, Ren; Spencer, Virginia A.; Bissell, Mina J.

2006-05-25T23:59:59.000Z

148

DOE Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Amend the External Power Supply Test Procedure; Docket No. EERE2014BTTP0043 / RIN 1904AD36  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On 12/19/2014, Apple Inc. met with DOE to discuss the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Amend the External Power Supply Test Procedure.

149

Does Health Insurance Coverage of Office Visits Influence Colorectal Cancer Testing?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Communication Short Communications Does Health Insurance Coverage of Office Visits Influence...Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control...Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control...

Reuben K. Varghese; Carol Friedman; Faruque Ahmed; Adele L. Franks; Marsha Manning; Laura C. Seeff

2005-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

150

Does morphological convergence imply functional similarity? A test using the evolution of quadrupedalism in ornithischian dinosaurs  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...convergence imply functional similarity? A test using the evolution of quadrupedalism in...form and function are closely related. We test the hypothesis that convergent skeletal...use stance in ornithischian dinosaurs to test the hypothesis that skeletal convergence...

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

151

Does coping style predict optimization? An experimental test in a wild passerine bird  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...predict optimization? An experimental test in a wild passerine bird Marion Nicolaus...precise local environmental knowledge. To test this, we quantified exploratory behaviour...Using a field-based novel environment test, we quantified exploratory behaviour as...

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

Accelerated Testing Validation - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Rangachary Mukundan 1 (Primary Contact), Rod Borup 1 , John Davey 1 , Roger Lujan 1 , Dennis Torraco 1 , David Langlois 1 , Fernando Garzon 1 , Dusan Spernjak 1 , Joe Fairweather 1 , Sivagaminathan Balasubramanian 2 , Adam Weber 2 , Mike Brady 3 , Karren More 3 , Greg James 4 , Dana Ayotte 4 , and Steve Grot 5 1 Los Alamos National Laboratory MS D429, P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Phone: (505) 665-8523 Email: Mukundan@lanl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Nancy Garland Phone: (202) 586-5673 Email: Nancy.Garland@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: 2 Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, CA 3 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN 4 Ballard Power Systems, Burnaby, BC V5J 5J8 Canada 5 Ion Power, New Castle, DE Project Start Date: Oct 2009

153

Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project Acceptance Criteria for Light Water Reactor Spent Fuel Storage System [OCRWM PER REV2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of the decommissioning of the 324 Building Radiochemical Engineering Cells there is a need to remove commercial Light Water Reactor (LWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) presently stored in these hot cells. To enable fuel removal from the hot cells, the commercial LWR SNF will be packaged and shipped to the 200 Area Interim Storage Area (ISA) in a manner that satisfies site requirements for SNF interim storage. This document identifies the criteria that the 324 Building Radiochemical Engineering Cell Clean-out Project must satisfy for acceptance of the LWR SNF by the SNF Project at the 200 Area ISA. In addition to the acceptance criteria identified herein, acceptance is contingent on adherence to applicable Project Hanford Management Contract requirements and procedures in place at the time of work execution.

JOHNSON, D.M.

2000-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

154

DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan DOEOE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan This document is designed to help guide and strengthen the DOEOE...

155

DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Test Procedure  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy has published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding test procedures for commercial refrigeration equipment.

156

DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding the Compliance Date for the Dehumidifier Test Procedure  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy has published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding the compliance date for the dehumidifier test procedure.

157

DOE Cell Component Accelerated Stress Test Protocols for PEM Fuel Cells  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document describes test protocols to assess the performance and durability of fuel cell components intended for automotive applications.

158

Does reduced heterozygosity influence dispersal? A test using spatially structured populations in an alpine ungulate  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...compared the average H O across categories using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Wilcoxon tests were conducted between all...0.43 0.01) and A (0.46 0.01) groups (Kruskal-Wallis test; chi 2 = 10.4, d.f. = 2, p 0.01...

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Amchitka Island Test Center - AK 01  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Amchitka Island Test Center - AK 01 Amchitka Island Test Center - AK 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Amchitka Island Test Center (AK.01) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Amchitka Island Test Center Documents Related to Amchitka Island Test Center Draft Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Amchitka Island, Alaska, Project Site (September 2013) An Assessment of the Reported Leakage of Anthropogenic Radionuclides From the Underground Nuclear Test Sites at Amchitka Island, Alaska, USA to the Surface Environment. Conceptual Site Models as a Tool in Evaluation Ecological health; The Case of the Department of Energys Amchitka Island Nuclear Test Site.

160

Status of DOE and AID stand-alone photovoltaic system field tests  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The NASA Lewis Research Center (LeRC) is managing stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) system projects sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID). The DOE project includes village PV power demonstration projects in Gabon (four sites) and the Marshall Islands, and PV-powered vaccine refrigerator systems in six countries. The AID project includes a large village power system, a farmhouse system and two water pumping-irrigation systems in Tunisia, a water pumping/grain grinding system in Upper Volta, five medical clinic systems in four countries, PV-powered vaccine refrigerator systems in 18 countries and a PVpowered remote earth station in Indonesia. This paper reviews these PV projects and summarizes significant findings to date.

Bifano, W.J.; DeLombard, R.; Ratajczak, A.F.; Scudder, L.R.

1984-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Direct Heating Equipment and Pool Heater Test Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy has published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding test procedures for direct heating equipment and pool heaters.

162

Comparison of Real World Energy Consumption to Models and DOE Test Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This study investigates the real-world energy performance of appliances and equipment as it compares with models and test procedures.

163

Geminivirus AL2 and L2 Proteins Interact with and Inactivate SNF1 Kinase  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...blue color) using a filter-lift assay. Interaction symbols...data are averages of two and four independent experiments with...distinguish between them. At this point, the relationship between SNF1...b-galactosidase activity using a filter-lift assay. A PCR product containing...

Linhui Hao; Hui Wang; Garry Sunter; David M. Bisaro

2003-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

164

Geminivirus AL2 and L2 Proteins Interact with and Inactivate SNF1 Kinase  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...be found in both the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments...resistance, although at the cost of adverse effects on...anti-His antibody. (C) Graph showing relative SNF1-KD...DuPont-New England Nuclear) to a final concentration...responses by PRL1, a nuclear WD protein, in Arabidopsis...

Linhui Hao; Hui Wang; Garry Sunter; David M. Bisaro

2003-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

165

SNF5/INI1 Deficiency Redefines Chromatin Remodeling Complex Composition during Tumor Development  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...most frequently appears in the kidney and brain, generally lack SNF5 (SMARCB1/INI1...commonly found in the kidneys (RTK) and brain (AT/RT). These tumors have a median...alAtypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor of the brain: case series and review of literature...

Darmood Wei; Dennis Goldfarb; Shujie Song; Courtney Cannon; Feng Yan; Donastas Sakellariou-Thompson; Michael Emanuele; Michael B. Major; Bernard E. Weissman; Yasumichi Kuwahara

2014-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

166

DOE/EA-1499; Radiological/Nuclear Countermeasures Test and Evaluation Complex, Nevada Test Site Final Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

499 499 Radiological/Nuclear Countermeasures Test and Evaluation Complex, Nevada Test Site Final Environmental Assessment August 2004 U. S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Las Vegas, Nevada Available for sale to the Public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 800.553.6847 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: orders@ntis..gov Online Ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm Available electronically at: http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors in paper from-- U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information

167

Machine Vision Tests for Spent Fuel Scrap Characteristics  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this work is to perform a feasibility test of a Machine Vision system for potential use at the Hanford K basins during spent nuclear fuel (SNF) operations. This report documents the testing performed to establish functionality of the system including quantitative assessment of results. Fauske and Associates, Inc., which has been intimately involved in development of the SNF safety basis, has teamed with Agris-Schoen Vision Systems, experts in robotics, tele-robotics, and Machine Vision, for this work.

BERGER, W.W.

2000-04-27T23:59:59.000Z

168

DOE-Sponsored Project Tests Novel Method to Increase Oil Recovery  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Successful laboratory tests at the Energy Departments National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) have verified that the use of a brine-soluble ionic surfactant could improve the efficiency of carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR).

169

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Naval Ordnance Test Station - CA 06  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Ordnance Test Station - CA 06 Ordnance Test Station - CA 06 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NAVAL ORDNANCE TEST STATION (CA.06) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: China Lake Naval Weapons Center Salt Wells Pilot Plant CA.06-1 Location: Inyokern , California CA.06-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 CA.06-1 Site Operations: Naval facility; experimental development work on shape charges and quality castings on a pilot plant scale. CA.06-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication that radioactive materials were handled at the site CA.06-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated CA.06-1 Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None CA.06-1 Radiological Survey(s): No Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see

170

DOE/EA-1300: Environmental Assessment for the Nevada Test Site Development Corporation's Desert Rock Sky Park at the Nevada Test Site (03/00)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NV EA-1300 NV EA-1300 The Nevada Test Site Development Corporation's Desert Rock Sky Park at the Nevada Test Site Environmental Assessment March 2000 United States Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada Available for public sale, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: (800) 553-6847 Fax: (703) 605-6900 Email: orders@ntis.fedworld.gov Online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm Available electronically at http://www.doe.gov.bridge Available for processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contactors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62

171

Where and when does a ring start and end? Testing the ring-species hypothesis in a species complex of Australian parrots  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...s00122-006-0381-4 Higgins, P.J Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic...dots) all as in figure 3 Where and when does a ring start and end? Testing the ring-species...to form. A ring speciation hypothesis does not explain the patterns we have observed...

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

172

Evaluation and compilation of DOE waste package test data: Biannual report, August 1987--January 1988  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes results of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) evaluations on waste packages designed for containment of radioactive high-level nuclear waste (HLW). The waste package is a proposed engineered barrier that is part of a permanent repository for HLW. Metal alloys are the principal barriers within the engineered system. Since enactment of the Budget Reconciliation Act for Fiscal Year 1988, the Yucca Mountain, Nevada, site (in which tuff is the geologic medium) is the only site that will be characterized for use as high-level nuclear waste repository. During the reporting period of August 1987 to January 1988, five reviews were completed for tuff, and these were grouped into the categories: ferrous alloys, copper, groundwater chemistry, and glass. Two issues are identified for the Yucca Mountain site: the approach used to calculate corrosion rates for ferrous alloys, and crevice corrosion was observed in a copper-nickel alloy. Plutonium can form pseudo-colloids that may facilitate transport. NBS work related to the vitrification of HLW borosilicate glass at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) and activities of the DOE Materials Characterization Center (MCC) for the 6-month reporting period are also included. 27 refs., 3 figs.

Interrante, C.; Escalante, E.; Fraker, A.; Ondik, H.; Plante, E.; Ricker, R.; Ruspi, J.

1988-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

DOE/NETL's Phase II Plans for Full-Scale Mercury Removal Technology Field-Testing  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Phase II Plans for Full-Scale Phase II Plans for Full-Scale Mercury Removal Technology Field-Testing Air Quality III September 12, 2002 Arlington, Va Scott Renninger, Project Manager for Mercury Control Technology Enviromental Projects Division Presentation Outline * Hg Program goals & objectives * Focus on Future Hg control R&D * Q&As President Bush's Clear Skies Initiative Current Mid-Term 2008-2010 2018 SO 2 11 million tons 4.5 million tons 3 million tons NOx 5 million tons 2.1 million tons 1.7 million tons Mercury 48 tons 26 tons 15 tons Annual U.S. Power Plant Emissions Mercury Control * Developing technologies ready for commercial demonstration: - By 2005, reduce emissions 50-70% - By 2010, reduce emissions by 90% - Cost 25-50% less than current estimates 2000 Year 48 Tons $2 - 5 Billion @ 90% Removal w/Activated

174

Evaluation of Maxim Module-Integrated Electronics at the DOE Regional Test Centers (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Module-embedded power electronics developed by Maxim Integrated are under evaluation through a partnership with the Department of Energy's Regional Test Center (RTC) program. Field deployments of both conventional modules and electronics-enhanced modules are designed to quantify the performance advantage of Maxim's products under different amounts of interrow shading, and their ability to be deployed at a greater ground-coverage ratio than conventional modules. Simulations in PVSYST have quantified the predicted performance difference between conventional modules and Maxim's modules from interrow shading. Initial performance results have identified diffuse irradiance losses at tighter row spacing for both the Maxim and conventional modules. Comparisons with published models show good agreement with models predicting the greatest diffuse irradiance losses. At tighter row spacing, all of the strings equipped with embedded power electronics outperformed their conventional peers. An even greater performance advantage is predicted to occur in the winter months when the amount of interrow shading mismatch is at a maximum.

Deline, C.; Sekulic, B.; Barkaszi, S.; Yang, J.; Kahn, S.

2014-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

Evaluation of Maxim Module-Integrated Electronics at the DOE Regional Test Centers: Preprint  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Module-embedded power electronics developed by Maxim Integrated are under evaluation through a partnership with the Department of Energy's Regional Test Center (RTC) program. Field deployments of both conventional modules and electronics-enhanced modules are designed to quantify the performance advantage of Maxim's products under different amounts of inter-row shading, and their ability to be deployed at a greater ground-coverage-ratio than conventional modules. Simulations in PVSYST have quantified the predicted performance difference between conventional modules and Maxim's modules from inter-row shading. Initial performance results have identified diffuse irradiance losses at tighter row spacing for both the Maxim and conventional modules. Comparisons with published models show good agreement with models predicting the greatest diffuse irradiance losses. At tighter row spacing, all of the strings equipped with embedded power electronics outperformed their conventional peers. An even greater performance advantage is predicted to occur in the winter months when the amount of inter-row shading mismatch is at a maximum.

Deline, C.; Sekulic, B.; Stein, J.; Barkaszi, S.; Yang, J.; Kahn, S.

2014-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

DOE SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL DISPOSAL CONTAINER  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal Container (SNF DC) supports the confinement and isolation of waste within the Engineered Barrier System of the Mined Geologic Disposal System (MGDS). Disposal containers are loaded and sealed in the surface waste handling facilities, transferred to the underground through the access mains, and emplaced in emplacement drifts. The DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal Container provides long term confinement of DOE SNF waste, and withstands the loading, transfer, emplacement, and retrieval loads and environments. The DOE SNF Disposal Containers provide containment of waste for a designated period of time, and limit radionuclide release thereafter. The disposal containers maintain the waste in a designated configuration, withstand maximum handling and rockfall loads, limit the individual waste canister temperatures after emplacement. The disposal containers also limit the introduction of moderator into the disposal container during the criticality control period, resist corrosion in the expected repository environment, and provide complete or limited containment of waste in the event of an accident. Multiple disposal container designs may be needed to accommodate the expected range of DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel. The disposal container will include outer and inner barrier walls and outer and inner barrier lids. Exterior labels will identify the disposal container and contents. Differing metal barriers will support the design philosophy of defense in depth. The use of materials with different failure mechanisms prevents a single mode failure from breaching the waste package. The corrosion-resistant inner barrier and inner barrier lid will be constructed of a high-nickel alloy and the corrosion-allowance outer barrier and outer barrier lid will be made of carbon steel. The DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal Containers interface with the emplacement drift environment by transferring heat from the waste to the external environment and by protecting the DOE waste canisters and their contents from damage/degradation by the external environment. The disposal containers also interface with the SNF by limiting access of moderator and oxidizing agents to the waste. The disposal containers interface with the Ex-Container System's emplacement drift disposal container supports. The disposal containers interface with the Canister Transfer System, Waste Emplacement System, Disposal Container Handling System, and Waste Package Remediation System during loading, handling, transfer, emplacement and remediation of the disposal container.

F. Habashi

1998-06-26T23:59:59.000Z

177

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Data Report on Data Report on Corrosion Testing of Stainless Steel SNF Storage Canisters Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Used Fuel Disposition Campaign D.G. Enos, C.R. Bryan, and K. M. Norman Sandia National Laboratories September 30, 2013 FCRD-UFD-2013-000324 SAND2013-8314P Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04- 94AL85000. DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty,

178

DOE/NBS (Department of Energy/National Bureau of Standards) forum on testing and rating procedures for consumer products, October 2-3, 1985. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

One hundred thirty-four persons participated in a Forum on Testing and Rating Procedures for Consumer Products held at the National Bureau of Standards (NBS), Gaithersburg, Maryland, on October 2-3, 1985. The objectives of the forum, planned in cooperation with various industry associations, were: (1) to provide a line of communication between test procedure users and test-procedure developers; (2) to provide an opportunity for participants to present technical and research issues concerning Department of Energy (DOE) test procedures that need to be addressed; and (3) to assist DOE and NBS in establishing a future agenda for the development and/or revision of testing and rating procedures. The report summarizes discussions, conclusions and recommendations developed by the forum participants for the following consumer products: heat pumps and air conditioners; furnaces, boilers, and household heaters; water heaters; refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers and freezers.

Dikkers, R.D.

1986-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

179

DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Information In Support of TSPA-VA  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

RW has started the viability assessment (VA) effort to determine the feasibility of Yucca Mountain as the first geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level waste. One component of the viability assessment will be a total system performance assessment (TSPA), based on the design concept and the scientific data and analysis available, describing the repository's probable behavior relative to the overall system performance standards. Thus, all the data collected from the Exploratory Studies Facility to-date have been incorporated into the latest TSPA model. In addition, the Repository Integration Program, an integrated probabilistic simulator, used in the TSPA has also been updated by Golder Associates Incorporated at December 1997. To ensure that the Department of Energy-owned (DOE-owned) SNF continues to be acceptable for disposal in the repository, it will be included in the TSPA-VA evaluation. A number of parameters are needed in the TSPA-VA models to predict the performance of the DOE-owned SNF materials placed into the potential repository. This report documents all of the basis and/or derivation for each of these parameters. A number of properties were not readily available at the time the TSPA-VA data was requested. Thus, expert judgement and opinion was utilized to determine a best property value. The performance of the DOE-owned SNF will be published as part of the TSPA-VA report. Each DOE site will be collecting better data as the DOE SNF program moves closer to repository license application. As required by the RW-0333P, the National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program will be assisting each site in qualifying the information used to support the performance assessment evaluations.

A. Brewer; D. Cresap; D. Fillmore; H. Loo; M. Ebner; R. McCormack

1998-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

180

Description of the Canadian Particulate-Fill WastePackage (WP) System for Spent-Nuclear Fuel (SNF) and its Applicability to Ligh-Water Reactor SNF WPS with Depleted Uranium-Dioxide Fill  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3502 3502 Chemical Technology Division DESCRIPTION OF THE CANADIAN PARTICULATE-FILL WASTE-PACKAGE (WP) SYSTEM FOR SPENT-NUCLEAR FUEL(SNF) AND ITS APPLICABILITY TO LIGHT- WATER REACTOR SNF WPS WITH DEPLETED URANIUM-DIOXIDE FILL Charles W. Forsberg Oak Ridge National Laboratory * P.O. Box 2008 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6180 Tel: (423) 574-6783 Fax: (423) 574-9512 Email: forsbergcw@ornl.gov October 20, 1997 _________________________ Managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corp. under contract DE-AC05-96OR22464 for the * U.S. Department of Energy. iii CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

 Topic Group Reports  DOE Program Summaries  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1999 Meeting 1999 Meeting  Topic Group Reports  DOE Program Summaries  Discussion of SNF Storage Initiatives & Transportations Issues  Discussion of WIPP Opening  Summary of Breakout Sessions The Transportation External Coordination (TEC) Working Group held its 15th semi-annual meeting July 14-15, 1999 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Over 150 members, participants, and observers representing state, tribal, and local governments, regional groups, industry and professional organizations, and the Department of Energy (DOE) met to address a variety of issues related to DOE's transportation activities for radioactive materials. A number of Departmental programs with transportation components were

182

Evaluation of Shortline Railroads & SNF/HLW Rail Shipment Inspections Tasked for the Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transportation Transportation Stakeholders National Transportation Stakeholders National Transportation Stakeholders National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Forum 2011 Annual Meeting 2011 Annual Meeting 2011 Annual Meeting 2011 Annual Meeting May 11, 2011 May 11, 2011 Evaluation of Shortline Railroads Evaluation of Shortline Railroads & & & & SNF/HLW Rail Shipment Inspections SNF/HLW Rail Shipment Inspections Tasked for the Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Tasked for the Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Evaluation of Shortline Railroads Evaluation of Shortline Railroads Evaluation of Shortline Railroads Evaluation of Shortline Railroads Task: Task: Task: Task: Identify Shortline Railroads Serving Nuclear Power Plants Identify Shortline Railroads Serving Nuclear Power Plants

183

Panel Discussion: Does Chemical Evidence Give Diagnostic Tests for the Credibility of Physical Models of the Origin of the Solar System?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

29 July 1988 research-article Panel Discussion: Does Chemical Evidence Give Diagnostic Tests for the Credibility of Physical Models of the Origin of the Solar System? M. M. Woolfson G. J. Wasserburg P. Pellas G. Turner H. Wanke J. T...

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

Test for Modeling Windows in DOE 2.1E for Comparing the Window Library with the Shading Coefficient Method for a Single-Family Residence in Texas  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. The window simulation tests are performed using single-pane, double-pane, and low-e glass on two standard DOE 2.1E single-family house models: 1) the model which has the R-value for wall, roof and floor according to 2000 IECC (Quick Wall), and 2) the model...

Kim, S.; Haberl, J. S.

2008-07-18T23:59:59.000Z

185

Renewable Electrolysis Integrated Systems Development and Testing - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Kevin Harrison National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 384-7091 Email: Kevin.Harrison@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Eric Miller Phone: (202) 287-5829 Email: Eric.Miller@hq.doe.gov Contributors: Chris Ainscough and Michael Peters Subcontractor: Marc Mann, Spectrum Automation Controls, Arvada, CO Project Start Date: October 1, 2003 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Validate stack and system efficiency and contributing * sub-system performance of DOE-awarded advanced electrolysis systems Collaborate with industry to optimize and demonstrate *

186

Development of a techno-economic model to optimization DOE spent nuclear fuel disposition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the National Spent Nuclear Fuel (NSNF) Program conducted by Lockheed Martin Idaho Technology Co. (LMITCO) at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) is to evaluate what to do with the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. Final disposition of the SNF may require that the fuel be treated to minimize material concerns. The treatments may range from electrometallurgical treatment and chemical dissolution to engineering controls. Treatment options and treatment locations will depend on the fuel type and the current locations of the fuel. One of the first steps associated with selecting one or more sites for treating the SNF in the DOE complex is to determine the cost of each option. An economic analysis will assist in determining which fuel treatment alternative attains the optimum disposition of SNF at the lowest possible cost to the government and the public. For this study, a set of questions was developed for the electrometallurgical treatment process for fuels at several locations. The set of questions addresses all issues associated with the design, construction, and operation of a production facility. A matrix table was developed to determine questions applicable to various fuel treatment options. A work breakdown structure (WBS) was developed to identify a treatment process and costs from initial design to shipment of treatment products to final disposition. Costs will be applied to determine the life-cycle cost of each option. This technique can also be applied to other treatment techniques for treating spent nuclear fuel.

Ramer, R.J.; Plum, M.M.; Adams, J.P.; Dahl, C.A.

1997-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

187

Development of a Techno-Economic Model to Optimize DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The National Spent Nuclear Fuel (NSNF) Program is evaluating final disposition of spent nuclear fuel (SNE) in the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. Final disposition of SNF may require that the fuel be treated to minimize material concerns. The treatments may range from electrometallurgical treatment (EMT) and chemical dissolution to engineering controls. Treatment options and treatment locations will depend on fuel type and location of the fuel. One of the first steps associated with selecting one or more sites for treating SNF in the DOE complex is to determine the cost of each option. An economic analysis will assist in determining which fuel treatment alternative attains the optimum disposition of SNF at the lowest possible cost to the government and the public. For this study, a set of questions was developed for the EMT process for fuels at several locations. The set of questions addresses all issues associated with design, construction, and operation of a production facility. A matrix table was developed to determine questions applicable to various fuel treatment options. A work breakdown structure (WBS) was developed to identify a treatment process and costs from initial design to shipment of treatment products to final disposition. Costs can be applied to determine the life cycle cost of each option. This technique can also be applied to other treatment techniques for treating SNF.

Ramer, R. J.; Plum, M. M.; Adams, J. P.; Dahl, C. A.

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Administered by the HSS Office of Corporate Safety Programs, the DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program (DOELAP) is responsible for implementing performance standards for DOE contractor external dosimetry and radiobioassay programs through periodic performance testing and on-site program assessments.

189

Vertical Drop of the Naval SNF Long Waste Package On Unyielding Surface  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this calculation is to determine the structural response of a Naval SNF (Spent Nuclear Fuel) Long Waste Package (WP) subjected to 2 m-vertical drop on unyielding surface (US). The scope of this document is limited to reporting the calculation results in terms of maximum stress intensities. This calculation is associated with the waste package design; calculation is performed by the Waste Package Design group. AP-3.12Q, Revision 0, ICN 0, Calculations, is used to perform the calculation and develop the document. The finite element calculation is performed by using the commercially available ANSYS Version (V) 5.4 finite element code. The result of this calculation is provided in terms of maximum stress intensities.

S. Mastilovic

2006-07-21T23:59:59.000Z

190

Component Testing for Industrial Trucks and Early Market Applications - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Aaron Harris (Primary Contact), Brian Somerday, Chris San Marchi Sandia National Laboratories P.O. Box 969 Livermore, CA 94551-0969 Phone: (925) 294-4530 Email: apharri@sandia.gov DOE Manager HQ: Antonio Ruiz Phone: (202) 586-0729 Email: Antonio.Ruiz@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: January 2010 Project End Date: May 2011 (carryover from Fiscal Year [FY] 2011 extended objectives into FY 2012) Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives (1) Provide technical basis for the development of standards defining the use of steel (Type 1) storage pressure vessels for gaseous hydrogen: Compare fracture mechanics based design approach - for fatigue assessment of pressure vessels for

191

Reversible Bending Fatigue Test System for Investigating Vibration Integrity of Spent Nuclear Fuel during Transportation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Transportation packages for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) must meet safety requirements under normal and accident conditions as specified by federal regulations. During transportation, SNF experiences unique conditions and challenges to cladding integrity due to the vibrational and impact loading during road or rail shipment. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has been developing testing capabilities that can be used to improve the understanding of the impacts on SNF integrity due to vibration loading, especially for high burn-up SNF in normal transportation operation conditions. This information can be used to meet the nuclear industry and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission needs in the area of safety and security of spent nuclear fuel storage and transport operations. The ORNL developed test system can perform reversible-bending fatigue testing to evaluate both the static and dynamic mechanical response of SNF rods under simulated loads. The testing apparatus is also designed to meet the challenges of hot-cell operation, including remote installation and detachment of the SNF test specimen, in-situ test specimen deformation measurement, and implementation of a driving system suitable for use in a hot cell. The system contains a U-frame set-up equipped with uniquely designed grip rigs, to protect SNF rod and to ensure valid test results, and use of 3 specially designed LVDTs to obtain the in-situ curvature measurement. A variety of surrogate test rods have been used to develop and calibrate the test system as well as in performing a series of systematic cyclic fatigue tests. The surrogate rods include stainless steel (SS) cladding, SS cladding with cast epoxy, and SS cladding with alumina pellets inserts simulating fuel pellets. Testing to date has shown that the interface bonding between the SS cladding and the alumina pellets has a significant impact on the bending response of the test rods as well as their fatigue strength. The failure behaviors observed from tested surrogate rods provides a fundamental understanding of the underlying failure mechanisms of the SNF surrogate rod under vibration which has not been achieved previously. The newly developed device is scheduled to be installed in the hot-cell in summer 2013 to test high burnup SNF.

Wang, Jy-An John [ORNL] [ORNL; Wang, Hong [ORNL] [ORNL; Bevard, Bruce Balkcom [ORNL] [ORNL; Howard, Rob L [ORNL] [ORNL; Flanagan, Michelle [U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission] [U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

192

Evaluation and compilation of DOE [Department of Energy] waste package test data; Biannual report, February 1988--July 1988  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes evaluations by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of Department of Energy (DOE) activities on waste packages designed for containment of radioactive high-level nuclear waste (HLW) for the six month period February 1988 through July 1988. Activities for the DOE Materials Characterization Center are reviewed for the period January 1988 through June 1988. A summary is given of the Yucca Mountain, Nevada disposal site activities. Short discussions relating to the reviewed publications are given and complete reviews and evaluations are included. 20 refs., 1 fig., 1 tab.

Interrante, C.; Escalante, E.; Fraker, A.; Plante, E.

1989-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

Test protocol for aluminum based spent nuclear fuel  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Aluminum based spent nuclear fuel (Al-SNF) will be treated and then stored in a geological repository. A series of corrosion tests, including coupon, galvanic, and electrochemical, were performed to measure the effects of degradation on U-Al alloys, which simulated various Al-SNF forms. The test solutions were variants of a J-13 well water chemistry. As part of the degradation characteristics, the dissolution of uranium, which is the primary radionuclide, was measured. The degradation and dissolution were changed by the type of water chemistry and the temperature. The alloy composition and fabrication were not significant variables.

Mickalonis, J.I.; Wiersma, B.J.

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

DOE Explosives Safety Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Manual describes DOE's explosives safety requirements applicable to operations involving the development, testing, handling, and processing of explosives or assemblies containing explosives.

1996-03-29T23:59:59.000Z

195

DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Residential Water Heater and Certain Commercial Water Heater Test Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy has published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding test procedures for residential water heaters and certain commercial water heaters.

196

Options for Determining Equivalent MHTM (Metric Tons of Heavy Metal) for DOE High Level Waste  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Section 114(d) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended (NWPA), limits the overall capacity of the first repository to 70,000 metric tons of heavy metal (MTHM). Current DOE policy is to allocate DOE spent fuel and high-level waste (HLW) at 10 percent of the total, or 7,000 MTHM. For planning purposes, 4,667 MTHM will be allocated for HLW. While the NWPA provides a technical basis for determining the MTHM equivalence of HLW, it does not address the significant technical differences between DOE HLW and commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF). Although more than 170,000 MTHM of DOE fuel has been reprocessed to produce the inventory of HLW, the amount of radioactive waste generated per metric ton of DOE fuel is only a few percent of that in a metric ton of commercial fuel. This study compares the results of four methods for determining the MTHM equivalence of DOE HLW. These methods include (1) using the actual weight of heavy metal in reprocessed DOE fuel, (2) assuming the historical equivalence of 0.5 MTHM/canister of vitrified DOE HLW, (3) comparing the total radioactivity in DOE HLW to the radioactivity of commercial SNF, and (4) comparing the total radiotoxicity of DOE HLW, as defined for those radionuclides identified in 10 CFR 20, with SNF at 1,000 and 10,000 years. This study concludes that either of the last two options would meet Congresss stated purposes of the NWPA, which are to (1) provide "reasonable assurance that the public and the environment will be adequately protected from the hazards posed by high-level radioactive waste and such spent nuclear fuel as may be disposed of in a repository", and (2) to "define Federal policy for the disposal of such waste and spent fuel".

Knecht, Dieter August; Valentine, James Henry; Luptak, Alan Jay; Staiger, Merle Daniel; Loo, Henry Hung Yiu; Wichmann, Thomas Leonard

1999-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

197

Evaluation and compilation of DOE waste package test data; Volume 8: Biannual report, August 1989--January 1990  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes evaluations by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of some of the Department of Energy (DOE) activities on waste packages designed for containment of radioactive high-level nuclear waste (HLW) for the six-month period, August 1989--January 1990. This includes reviews of related materials research and plans, information on the Yucca Mountain, Nevada disposal site activities, and other information regarding supporting research and special assistance. Short discussions are given relating to the publications reviewed and complete reviews and evaluations are included. Reports of other work are included in the Appendices.

Interrante, C.G. [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States). Div. of High-Level Waste Management; Fraker, A.C.; Escalante, E. [National Inst. of Standards and Technology (MSEL), Gaithersburg, MD (United States). Metallurgy Div.

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

198

DOE/EIS-0251; Supplemental Analysis For a Container System for the Management of DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Located at the INEEL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ID-10636 ID-10636 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS FOR A CONTAINER SYSTEM FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DOE SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL LOCATED AT THE INEEL March 1999 U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office Idaho Falls, Idaho DOE/ID-10636 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS FOR A CONTAINER SYSTEM FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DOE SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL LOCATED AT THE INEEL March 1999 Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office Idaho Falls, Idaho SNF Supplement Analysis ii March 1999 CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................. v Summary ..........................................................................................................................S-1 1.0 Purpose and Proposed Action ......................................................................................

199

DOE EM-67 FRSTL ~-+-+ B CLARK  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ofi·/20198 THU 16:26 FAX 202 586 5256 Ofi·/20198 THU 16:26 FAX 202 586 5256 DOE EM-67 FRSTL ~-+-+ B CLARK r r ( DOE/EIS-0218-SA .. l SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS OF ACCEPTANCE OF FOREIGN RESEARCH REACTOR SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL UNDER SCENARIOS NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED IN THE EIS Introduction The Dep~ent of Energy is proposing to transport spent nuclear fuel by ship from forty-one ( 41) eligible countries that host research reactors using, or that have used, United States-enriched uranium as fuel for the reactors. The decision to transport by ship and accept foreign research reactor spent nuclear fuel {FRR SNF) frOm foreign research reactors was based on an analysis of potential environmental impacts in the Final Environmental Impact Statement on a Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliforation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear

200

Cold vacuum drying proof of performance (first article testing) test results  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents and details the test results of the first of a kind process referred to as Cold Vacuum Drying (CVD). The test results are compiled from several months of testing of the first process equipment skid and ancillary components to de-water and dry Multi-Canister Overpacks (MCO) filled with Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF). The tests results provide design verifications, equipment validations, model validation data, and establish process parameters.

MCCRACKEN, K.J.

1999-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Geothermal well site restoration and plug and abandonment of wells, DOE Gladys McCall test site, Cameron Parish, Louisiana and DOE Willis Hulin test site, Vermillion Parish, Louisiana  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A report is presented on the final phase of an energy research program conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) involving two geothermal well sites in the State of Louisiana--the Gladys McCall site and the Willis Hulin site. The research program was intended to improve geothermal technology and to determine the efficacy of producing electricity commercially from geopressured resource sites. The final phase of the program consisted of plug and abandonment (P&A) of the wells and restoration of the well sites. Restoration involved (a) initial soil and water sampling and analysis; (b) removal and disposal of well pads, concrete, utility poles, and trash; (c) plugging of monitor and freshwater wells; and (d) site leveling and general cleanup. Restoration of the McCall site required removal of naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), which was costly and time-consuming. Exhibits are included that provide copies of work permits and authorizations, P&A reports, and cost and salvage reports. Site locations, grid maps, and photographs are provided.

Rinehart, Ben N.

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

202

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

54 54 Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Draft November 2013 DOE/EA-1954 Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Draft November 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE Idaho Operations Office ii CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................. v

203

Tribology of improved transformation-toughened ceramics-heat engine test. Final report: DOE/ORNL Ceramic Technology Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A short term study has been carried out to evaluate the suitability as cam roller followers of three ceria zirconia toughened aluminas and two yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconias (YTZPs) previously enhanced in programs supported by ORNL. Norton Si{sub 3}N{sub 4} (NBD-100) was also included in this study as a reference material, because it was known from work at Northwestern University that Si{sub 3}N{sub 4} to experienced little or no wear in this application, and NBD-100 is currently a successful commercial bearing material. The tribological studies were subcontracted to the Torrington Company. They found that in cam roller follower simulated tests that there was essentially no wear after 1 hour and 5 hours of testing detectable by weighing and concluded that all of these ceramics are, therefore, candidate materials. Because of the minute amounts of wear it was not possible to identify the wear mechanism or to make any correlations with the other physical properties which were evaluated such as MOR, K{sub IC} hardness, density and grain size. Phase transformation during rolling has been of interest in the tribology of zirconia contain materials. The least stable of the ceria zirconia toughened aluminas resulted in as much as 33% monoclinic phase after testing whereas the yttria stabilized (TTZ) contained very little of this transformed phase. The results of this study show that oxide materials can now be considered as candidates for cam roller followers in heat engines.

Lilley, E.; Rossi, G.A.; Pelletier, P.J. [Norton Co., Northboro, MA (United States). Advanced Ceramics Div.

1992-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

Depleted uranium: A DOE management guide  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has a management challenge and financial liability in the form of 50,000 cylinders containing 555,000 metric tons of depleted uranium hexafluoride (UF{sub 6}) that are stored at the gaseous diffusion plants. The annual storage and maintenance cost is approximately $10 million. This report summarizes several studies undertaken by the DOE Office of Technology Development (OTD) to evaluate options for long-term depleted uranium management. Based on studies conducted to date, the most likely use of the depleted uranium is for shielding of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) or vitrified high-level waste (HLW) containers. The alternative to finding a use for the depleted uranium is disposal as a radioactive waste. Estimated disposal costs, utilizing existing technologies, range between $3.8 and $11.3 billion, depending on factors such as applicability of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the location of the disposal site. The cost of recycling the depleted uranium in a concrete based shielding in SNF/HLW containers, although substantial, is comparable to or less than the cost of disposal. Consequently, the case can be made that if DOE invests in developing depleted uranium shielded containers instead of disposal, a long-term solution to the UF{sub 6} problem is attained at comparable or lower cost than disposal as a waste. Two concepts for depleted uranium storage casks were considered in these studies. The first is based on standard fabrication concepts previously developed for depleted uranium metal. The second converts the UF{sub 6} to an oxide aggregate that is used in concrete to make dry storage casks.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

205

Advanced Test Reactor Complex Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

U.S. Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Advanced Test Reactor Complex facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. U.S. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool to develop the radioactive waste management basis.

Lisa Harvego; Brion Bennett

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

Biochemical and Developmental Characterization of a SNF2-like ATPase Amplified in Liver Cancer 1 (ALC1)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Nearly twenty years ago Gorbalenya and Koonin [28-29] discovered a large family of proteins sharing a series of short ordered motifs. At the time, the majority of family members that had been studied had been shown to act enzymatically as nucleic acid... family proteins. A. Crystal structure of Rad54 and structural features found within. B Schematic depicting structural components of Snf2 family of helicases. Figure adapted from Flaus, A.et al. Nucl. Acids Res., 2006. 34(10):2887-2905 [30]. 21...

Gottschalk, Aaron James

2010-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

207

TEST SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL BENDING STIFFNESS AND VIBRATION INTEGRITY  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Transportation packages for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) must meet safety requirements specified by federal regulations. For normal conditions of transport, vibration loads incident to transport must be considered. This is particularly relevant for high-burnup fuel (>45 GWd/MTU). As the burnup of the fuel increases, a number of changes occur that may affect the performance of the fuel and cladding in storage and during transportation. The mechanical properties of high-burnup de-fueled cladding have been previously studied by subjecting defueled cladding tubes to longitudinal (axial) tensile tests, ring-stretch tests, ring-compression tests, and biaxial tube burst tests. The objective of this study is to investigate the mechanical properties and behavior of both the cladding and the fuel in it under vibration/cyclic loads similar to the sustained vibration loads experienced during normal transport. The vibration loads to SNF rods during transportation can be characterized by dynamic, cyclic, bending loads. The transient vibration signals in a specified transport environment can be analyzed, and frequency, amplitude and phase components can be identified. The methodology being implemented is a novel approach to study the vibration integrity of actual SNF rod segments through testing and evaluating the fatigue performance of SNF rods at defined frequencies. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has developed a bending fatigue system to evaluate the response of the SNF rods to vibration loads. A three-point deflection measurement technique using linear variable differential transformers is used to characterize the bending rod curvature, and electromagnetic force linear motors are used as the driving system for mechanical loading. ORNL plans to use the test system in a hot cell for SNF vibration testing on high burnup, irradiated fuel to evaluate the pellet-clad interaction and bonding on the effective lifetime of fuel-clad structure bending fatigue performance. Technical challenges include pure bending implementation, remote installation and detachment of the SNF test specimen, test specimen deformation measurement, and identification of a driving system suitable for use in a hot cell. Surrogate test specimens have been used to calibrate the test setup and conduct systematic cyclic tests. The calibration and systematic cyclic tests have been used to identify test protocol issues prior to implementation in the hot cell. In addition, cyclic hardening in unidirectional bending and softening in reverse bending were observed in the surrogate test specimens. The interface bonding between the surrogate clad and pellets was found to impact the bending response of the surrogate rods; confirming this behavior in the actual spent fuel segments will be an important aspect of the hot cell test implementation,

Wang, Jy-An John [ORNL] [ORNL; Wang, Hong [ORNL] [ORNL; Bevard, Bruce Balkcom [ORNL] [ORNL; Howard, Rob L [ORNL] [ORNL; Flanagan, Michelle [U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission] [U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

DOE Explosives Safety Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Manual describes the Departments explosive safety requirements applicable to operations involving the development, testing, handling, and processing of explosives or assemblies containing explosives. Cancels DOE M 440.1-1. Canceled by DOE O 440.1B Chg 1.

2006-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

209

Does prey size matter? Novel observations of feeding in the leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) allow a test of predatorprey size relationships  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...journal is 2011 The Royal Society 23 June 2012 research-article Animal behaviour 1001 14 Does prey size matter? Novel observations...turtle, Dermochelys coriacea, does not strictly adhere to this general...htslp notincludedinsearchtext Does prey size matter? Novel observations...

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

RESULTS OF FIELD TESTING DOE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of Energy facility located within Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3 (NPR-3), also known as Teapot Dome Oil Field, about 35 miles north of Casper, Wyoming. Teapot Dome Field, Natrona...

211

Supplement analysis for a container system for the management of DOE spent nuclear fuel located at the INEEL  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing the NEPA, 40 CFR 1502.9 (c), directs federal agencies to prepare a supplement to an environmental impact statement when an agency makes substantial changes in the Proposed Action that are relevant to environmental concerns, or there are significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the Proposed Action or impacts. When it is unclear whether a supplemental environmental impact statement is required, DOE regulations (10 CFR 1021.314) direct the preparation of a supplement analysis to assist in making that determination. This supplement analysis evaluates the impacts of employing dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) to prepare DOE SNF located at the INEEL for interim onsite storage and transport outside the State of Idaho. Impacts associated with DPC manufacturing, loading and storage of DOE-ID SNF into DPCs, transport of loaded DPCs outside Idaho, and the cumulative impacts are compared with the impacts previously analyzed in the SNF and INEL EIS and the Navy Container System EIS. This SA provides information to determine whether: (1) an existing EIS should be supplemented; (2) a new EIS should be prepared; or (3) no further NEPA documentation is required.

NONE

1999-03-12T23:59:59.000Z

212

Test Area North Pool Stabilization Project: Environmental assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Test Area North (TAN) Pool is located within the fenced TAN facility boundaries on the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL). The TAN pool stores 344 canisters of core debris from the March, 1979, Three Mile Island (TMI) Unit 2 reactor accident; fuel assemblies from Loss-of-Fluid Tests (LOFT); and Government-owned commercial fuel rods and assemblies. The LOFT and government owned commercial fuel rods and assemblies are hereafter referred to collectively as {open_quotes}commercial fuels{close_quotes} except where distinction between the two is important to the analysis. DOE proposes to remove the canisters of TMI core debris and commercial fuels from the TAN Pool and transfer them to the Idaho Chemical Processing Plant (ICPP) for interim dry storage until an alternate storage location other than at the INEL, or a permanent federal spent nuclear fuel (SNF) repository is available. The TAN Pool would be drained and placed in an industrially and radiologically safe condition for refurbishment or eventual decommissioning. This environmental assessment (EA) identifies and evaluates environmental impacts associated with (1) constructing an Interim Storage System (ISS) at ICPP; (2) removing the TMI and commercial fuels from the pool and transporting them to ICPP for placement in an ISS, and (3) draining and stabilizing the TAN Pool. Miscellaneous hardware would be removed and decontaminated or disposed of in the INEL Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC). This EA also describes the environmental consequences of the no action alternative.

NONE

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

The Application and Verification of ASHRAE 152-2004 (Method of Test for Determining the Design and Seasonal Efficiencies of Residential Thermal Distribution Systems) to DOE-2-1e Simulation Program  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ESL-TR-08-06-01 THE APPLICATION AND VERIFICATION OF ASHRAE 152-2004 (Method of Test for Determining the Design and Seasonal Efficiencies of Residential Thermal Distribution Systems) TO DOE-2.1e SIMULATION PROGRAM Jeff S... Systems Laboratory, Texas A&M University System 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the application and verification of duct model on DOE 2.1e version 119 using ASHRAE 152-2004 (Method of Test for Determining the Design and Seasonal...

Kim, S.; Haberl, J. S.

214

Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project Cask and MCO Helium Purge System Design Review Completion Report Project A.5 and A.6  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the results of the design verification performed on the Cask and Multiple Canister Over-pack (MCO) Helium Purge System. The helium purge system is part of the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project Cask Loadout System (CLS) at 100K area. The design verification employed the ''Independent Review Method'' in accordance with Administrative Procedure (AP) EN-6-027-01.

ARD, K.E.

2000-04-19T23:59:59.000Z

215

Proceedings of the 22nd Annual DoD/DOE Seismic Research Symposium: Planning for Verification of and Compliance with the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

These proceedings contain papers prepared for the 22nd Annual DoD/DOE Seismic Research Symposium: Planning for Verification of and Compliance with the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), held 13-15 September 2000 in New Orleans, Louisiana. These papers represent the combined research related to ground-based nuclear explosion monitoring funded by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), Air Force Technical Applications Center (AFTAC), Department of Defense (DoD), US Army Space and Missile Defense Command, Defense Special Weapons Agency (DSWA), and other invited sponsors. The scientific objectives of the research are to improve the United States capability to detect, locate, and identify nuclear explosions. The purpose of the meeting is to provide the sponsoring agencies, as well as potential users, an opportunity to review research accomplished during the preceding year and to discuss areas of investigation for the coming year. For the researchers, it provides a forum for the exchange of scientific information toward achieving program goals, and an opportunity to discuss results and future plans. Paper topics include: seismic regionalization and calibration; detection and location of sources; wave propagation from source to receiver; the nature of seismic sources, including mining practices; hydroacoustic, infrasound, and radionuclide methods; on-site inspection; and data processing.

Nichols, James W., LTC [Editor

2000-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

216

DOE Online  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fermilab's Science Adventures! Fermilab's Science Adventures! DOE Online K-12 Instructional Resources ed.fnal.gov/doe/ The U.S. Department of Energy is committed to helping educate our nation's next generation of scientists. The following resources help teachers integrate the Internet into K-12 classroom instruction. DOE Labs General Instructional Units Online Resources Lesson Plans General References DOE Laboratory and Facility Education Home Pages (www-ed.fnal.gov/doe/doe_labs.html) Direct links for 27 education Websites at DOE national laboratories and facilities. Online Catalog (www-ed.fnal.gov/trc/library) Fermilab's Teacher Resource Center collection of 10,000+ PreK-12 instructional materials in science, mathematics and technology. Materials include tradebooks, curriculum materials, educational

217

Reversible Bending Fatigue Testing on Zry-4 Surrogate Rods  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Testing high-burnup spent nuclear fuel (SNF) presents many challenges in areas such as specimen preparation, specimen installation, mechanical loading, load control, measurements, data acquisition, and specimen disposal because these tasks are complicated by the radioactivity of the test specimens. Research and comparison studies conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) resulted in a new concept in 2010 for a U-frame testing setup on which to perform hot-cell reversible bending fatigue testing. Subsequently, the three-dimensional finite element analysis and the engineering design of components were completed. In 2013 the ORNL team finalized the upgrade of the U-frame testing setup and the integration of the U-frame setup into a Bose dual linear motor test bench to develop a cyclic integrated reversible-bending fatigue tester (CIRFT). A final check was conducted on the CIRFT test system in August 2013, and the CIRFT was installed in the hot cell in September 2013 to evaluate both the static and dynamic mechanical response of SNF rods under simulated loads. The fatigue responses of Zircaloy-4 (Zry-4) cladding and the role of pellet pellet and pellet clad interactions are critical to SNF vibration integrity, but such data are not available due to the unavailability of an effective testing system. While the deployment of the developed CIRFT test system in a hot cell will provide the opportunity to generate the data, the use of a surrogate rod has proven quite effective in identifying the underlying deformation mechanism of an SNF composite rod under an equivalent loading condition. This paper presents the experimental results of using surrogate rods under CIRFT reversible cyclic loading. Specifically, monotonic and cyclic bending tests were conducted on surrogate rods made of a Zry-4 tube and alumina pellet inserts, both with and without an epoxy bond.

Wang, Jy-An John [ORNL; Wang, Hong [ORNL; Bevard, Bruce Balkcom [ORNL; Howard, Rob L [ORNL

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

DOE/EA-1583: Final Site-wide Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center/Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3 (October 2008)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ROCKY MOUNTAIN OILFIELD TESTING CENTER / ROCKY MOUNTAIN OILFIELD TESTING CENTER / NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVE NO. 3 FINAL Site-wide Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact October 2008 U.S. Department of Energy Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center 907 N. Poplar Street, Suite 150 Casper WY 82601 DOE/EA-1583 Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center / Naval Petroleum Reserve No.3 Final Site-Wide Environmental Assessment i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS.................................................................................................vii SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1

219

Improved Accelerated Stress Tests Based on Fuel Cell Vehicle Data - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Timothy Patterson (Primary Contact), V. Srinivasamurthi, T. Skiba UTC Power Corp. 195 Governor's Highway South Windsor, CT 06074 Phone: (860) 727-2274 Email: timothy.patterson@utcpower.com DOE Managers HQ: Kathi Epping Martin Phone: (202) 586-7425 Email: Kathi.Epping@ee.doe.gov GO: David Peterson Phone: (720) 356-1747 Email: David.Peterson@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0000468 Subcontractors: * United Technologies Research Center, East Hartford, CT * Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM * Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN

220

Fuel Retrieval Sub (FRS) Project Decapping Station Performance Test Data Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is to provide the test data report for Decapping Station Performance Testing. These performance tests were full scale and viewed as a continuation of development testing performed earlier (SNF-2710). A prototype decapping station confinement box was tested, along with some special tools required for the process, providing assurance that the fuel handling equipment will operate as designed, allowing for release of the FRS equipment for installation.

THIELGES, J.R.

2000-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Comparison of Real World Energy Consumption to Models and DOE...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Comparison of Real World Energy Consumption to Models and DOE Test Procedures Comparison of Real World Energy Consumption to Models and DOE Test Procedures This study investigates...

222

Refinement, testing, and application of an Integrated Data Assimilation/Sounding System (IDASS) for the DOE/ARM Experimental Program. Final report for period September 20, 1990 - May 8, 1997  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes work done by NCAR under the ''Refinement, Testing, and Application of an Integrated Data Assimilation/Sounding System (IDASS) for the DOE/ARM Experimental Program''. It includes a discussion of the goals, findings and a list of 27 journal articles, 92 non-refereed papers and 30 other presentations not associated with a formal publication.

Parsons, David B.

2002-04-09T23:59:59.000Z

223

DOE PAGES  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

a useful reference. Find out more Do you have questions about DOE PAGESBeta content, procedures, or policies? More information is available at OSTI's Public Access Policy page and...

224

DOE News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SMALL BUSINESS SYMPOSIUM TO LINK LOCAL COMPANIES WITH HANFORD CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at the Hanford...

225

Analysis of core samples from the BPXA-DOE-USGS Mount Elbert gas hydrate stratigraphic test well: Insights into core disturbance and handling  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Collecting and preserving undamaged core samples containing gas hydrates from depth is difficult because of the pressure and temperature changes encountered upon retrieval. Hydrate-bearing core samples were collected at the BPXA-DOE-USGS Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well in February 2007. Coring was performed while using a custom oil-based drilling mud, and the cores were retrieved by a wireline. The samples were characterized and subsampled at the surface under ambient winter arctic conditions. Samples thought to be hydrate bearing were preserved either by immersion in liquid nitrogen (LN), or by storage under methane pressure at ambient arctic conditions, and later depressurized and immersed in LN. Eleven core samples from hydrate-bearing zones were scanned using x-ray computed tomography to examine core structure and homogeneity. Features observed include radial fractures, spalling-type fractures, and reduced density near the periphery. These features were induced during sample collection, handling, and preservation. Isotopic analysis of the methane from hydrate in an initially LN-preserved core and a pressure-preserved core indicate that secondary hydrate formation occurred throughout the pressurized core, whereas none occurred in the LN-preserved core, however no hydrate was found near the periphery of the LN-preserved core. To replicate some aspects of the preservation methods, natural and laboratory-made saturated porous media samples were frozen in a variety of ways, with radial fractures observed in some LN-frozen sands, and needle-like ice crystals forming in slowly frozen clay-rich sediments. Suggestions for hydrate-bearing core preservation are presented.

Kneafsey, Timothy J.; Lu, Hailong; Winters, William; Boswell, Ray; Hunter, Robert; Collett, Timothy S.

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

226

Evaluation of Codisposal Viability for TH/U Carbide (Fort Saint Vrain HTGR) DOE-Owned Fuel  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

There are more than 250 forms of US Department of Energy (DOE)-owned spent nuclear fuel (SNF). Due to the variety of the spent nuclear fuel, the National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program has designated nine representative fuel groups for disposal criticality analyses based on fuel matrix, primary fissile isotope, and enrichment. The Fort Saint Vrain reactor (FSVR) SNF has been designated as the representative fuel for the Th/U carbide fuel group. The FSVR SNF consists of small particles (spheres of the order of 0.5-mm diameter) of thorium carbide or thorium and high-enriched uranium carbide mixture, coated with multiple, thin layers of pyrolytic carbon and silicon carbide, which serve as miniature pressure vessels to contain fission products and the U/Th carbide matrix. The coated particles are bound in a carbonized matrix, which forms fuel rods or ''compacts'' that are loaded into large hexagonal graphite prisms. The graphite prisms (or blocks) are the physical forms that are handled in reactor loading and unloading operations, and which will be loaded into the DOE standardized SNF canisters. The results of the analyses performed will be used to develop waste acceptance criteria. The items that are important to criticality control are identified based on the analysis needs and result sensitivities. Prior to acceptance to fuel from the Th/U carbide fuel group for disposal, the important items for the fuel types that are being considered for disposal under the Th/U carbide fuel group must be demonstrated to satisfy the conditions determined in this report.

H. radulescu

2001-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

227

Key Technologies, Thermal Management, and Prototype Testing for Advanced Solid-State Hydrogen Storage Systems - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Joseph W. Reiter (Primary Contact), Alexander Raymond, Channing C. Ahn (Caltech), Bret Naylor, Otto Polanco, Rajeshuni Ramesham, and Erik Lopez Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Mail Stop 79-24 Pasadena, CA 91109-8099 Phone: (818) 354-4224; Email: Joseph.W.Reiter@jpl.nasa.gov DOE Managers HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov GO: Jesse Adams Phone: (720) 356-1421 Email: Jesse.Adams@go.doe.gov Subcontractor: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA Project Start Date: February, 2009 Project End Date: September, 2014 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Identify state-of-art concepts and designs for * cryosorbent-based hydrogen storage systems

228

Final Report for DOE Grant DE-FG02-06ER64160 Retrieval of Cloud Properties and Direct Testing of Cloud and Radiation Parameterizations using ARM Observations.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report briefly summaries the work performed at KNMI under DOE Grant DE-FG02-06ER64160 which, in turn was conducted in support of DOE Grant DE-FG02-90ER61071 lead by E. Clothieux of Penn. State U. The specific work at KNMI revolved around the development and application of the EarthCARE simulator to ground-based multi-sensor simulations.

Donovan, David Patrick [KNMI

2013-07-26T23:59:59.000Z

229

DOE017-0153  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5525 5525 DOE017-0153 ,-.or/ N"( - ./,'-'S MaryBeth Zimmerman 02/14/2001 11:08AM / -- T ' ,44 L - ( _w _1_'- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .I f . J To: Kenneth Friedman/EE/DOE@DOE, Peggy Podolak/EE/DOE@DOE, Linda Silverman/EE/DOE@DOE, Ed Wall/EE/DOE@DOE, David RodgerslEE/DOE@DOE, Jerry DionlEE/DOE@DOE, Gail McKinley/EE/DOE@DOE. Lawrence MansuetifEE/DOE@DOE cc: John Sullivan/EE/DOE@DOE. Darrell Beschen/EEIDOE@DOE, Michael York/EE/DOE@DOE, Buddy GarlandlEEIDOE@DOE, Nancy Jefferv/EEIDOE@DOE, Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE. Sam Baldwin/EE/DOE@DOE, IEE-ADAS Subject: FW: NEP Draft outline Directions on NEP Assessment paper. Please read all of this very carefully before proceeding: Product Schedule: * Inputs due from sectors to Planning: COB on Thursday (sorry) o Due from EERE to Policy Office: noon on Friday

230

DOE PAGES  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

States Government purposes. (End of Notice) Ref. DEAR970.5227-2 Rights in data-technology transfer DOE-funded authors are free to publish in journals of their choice, including...

231

Microsoft Word - doe_EIS_0245F-SA-03_080411a.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5F-SA-03 5F-SA-03 Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 August 2011 DOE/EIS-0245F-SA-03 iii Summary 1 This supplement analysis (SA) has been prepared to allow a determination by the U.S. Department of 2 Energy (DOE) on whether further National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) review is needed 3 as DOE continues to manage spent nuclear fuel (SNF), including knockout pot (KOP) product material, in 4 multi-canister overpacks (MCOs) at the Hanford Site's Canister Storage Building (CSB). 5 In January 1996, the DOE issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (K Basins FEIS) on 6

232

Facility Effluent Monitoring Plan for the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A facility effluent monitoring plan is required by the US. Department of Energy in DOE Order 5400.1 for any operations that involve hazardous materials and radioactive substances that could impact employee or public safety or the environment. This document was prepared using the specific guidelines identified in Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC)-EP-0438-1, ''A Guide for Preparing Hanford Site Facility Effluent Monitoring Plans'', and assesses effluent monitoring systems and evaluates whether they are adequate to ensure the public health and safety as specified in applicable federal, state, and local requirements. This facility effluent monitoring plan is the third revision to the original annual report. This document is reviewed annually even if there are no operational changes, and it is updated as necessary.

HUNACEK, G.S.

2000-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

Criticality Analysis for Proposed Maximum Fuel Loading in a Standardized SNF Canister with Type 1a Baskets  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document represents a summary version of the criticality analysis done to support loading SNF in a Type 1a basket/standard canister combination. Specifically, this engineering design file (EDF) captures the information pertinent to the intact condition of four fuel types with different fissile loads and their calculated reactivities. These fuels are then degraded into various configurations inside a canister without the presence of significant moderation. The important aspect of this study is the portrayal of the fuel degradation and its effect on the reactivity of a single canister given the supposition there will be continued moderation exclusion from the canister. Subsequent analyses also investigate the most reactive dry canister in a nine canister array inside a hypothetical transport cask, both dry and partial to complete flooding inside the transport cask. The analyses also includes a comparison of the most reactive configuration to other benchmarked fuels using a software package called TSUNAMI, which is part of the SCALE 5.0 suite of software.

Chad Pope; Larry L. Taylor; Soon Sam Kim

2007-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

DOE HANDBOOK  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Handbook on Overseas Assignments Handbook on Overseas Assignments United States Department of Energy Office of Human Capital Management July 2013 2 Introduction This handbook covers all types of Federal employment overseas, including details, both within DOE as well as to other agencies; transfers to approved international organizations; assignments to permanent DOE positions; cost-free experts; and personal services agreements (PSAs). This handbook contains information, guidance, sample service agreements, and related documentation that are to be used to implement the following directives: a. Executive Order 11552, Providing for Details and Transfers of Federal Employees to International Organizations at http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/11552.html;

235

DOE Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

236

DOE Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

772 772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

237

Order Module--DOE-HDBK-1203-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING OF TECHNICAL STAFF AND MANAGERS, DOE-HDBK-1204-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEST ITEMS,DOE-HDBK-1205-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The familiar level of this module is divided into four sections. In the first section, the module will present DOE-HDBK-1203-97, Training Program for Technical Staff Personnel, which covers the...

238

Articles about Testing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Stories about testing facilities, capabilities, and certification featured by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Wind Program.

239

DOE-STD-3025-2007 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

elements of a Department of Energy (DOE) program for quality assurance and performance testing of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters to be installed in DOE Nuclear...

240

DOE-HDBK-1092-2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Electrical Safety Superseding DOE-HDBK-1092-2004 (December 2004) Generally, the guidance contained in this Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook for Electrical Safety, DOE-HDBK-1092-2013, for implementing electrical safety at DOE facilities is based on well-developed industrial practices, mandatory rules, or nationally-recognized consensus codes or standards. The guidelines are written to be flexible, so that they encompass the range from large, permanent DOE test or production facilities to small research or testing facilities. These guidelines form a compendium of good practices and describe key elements of programs that support electrical safety at DOE facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

T-F and S/DOE Gladys McCall No. 1 well, Cameron Parish, Louisiana. Geopressured-geothermal well report, Volume II. Well workover and production testing, February 1982-October 1985. Final report. Part 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The T-F and S/DOE Gladys McCall No. 1 well was the fourth in a series of wells in the DOE Design Wells Program that were drilled into deep, large geopressured-geothermal brine aquifers in order to provide basic data with which to determine the technological and economic viability of producing energy from these unconventional resources. This brine production well was spudded on May 27, 1981 and drilling operations were completed on November 2, 1981 after using 160 days of rig time. The well was drilled to a total depth of 16,510 feet. The target sands lie at a depth of 14,412 to 15,860 feet in the Fleming Formation of the lower Miocene. This report covers well production testing operations and necessary well workover operations during the February 1982 to October 1985 period. The primary goals of the well testing program were: (1) to determine reservoir size, shape, volume, drive mechanisms, and other reservoir parameters, (2) to determine and demonstrate the technological and economic viability of producing energy from a geopressured-geothermal brine aquifer through long-term production testing, and (3) to determine problem areas associated with such long-term production, and to develop solutions therefor.

Not Available

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity (AVTA) - Vehicle Testing and...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

- Vehicle Testing and Demonstration Activities Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity (AVTA) - Vehicle Testing and Demonstration Activities 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle...

243

DOE F 5631  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

(07/03) OFFICIAL USE ONLY OMB Control No. 1910-5122 (07/03) OFFICIAL USE ONLY OMB Control No. 1910-5122 Replaces DOE F 5631.35 A ll other editions obsolete. 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HUMAN RELIABILITY PROGRAM (HRP) CERTIFICATION NAME: INITIAL [ ] ANNUAL [ ] POSITION:_____________________________ DRUG TESTING DATE:___________________ EMPLOYER:___________________________ ALCOHOL TESTING DATE:_______________ ANNIVERSARY/DUE DATE:_____________ TRAINING COMPLETION DATE:__________ COUNTERINTELLIGENCE EVALUATION APPROVAL DATE: __________________________________ SECTION A - SUPERVISORY REVIEW I have reviewed all available information regarding this individual and have no reason to believe that this individual may represent a security or safety concern. (If you cannot make such an affirmation, then do not sign here and

244

DOE/EA-1626: Final Environmental Assessment for Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) Phase III Large-Scale Field Test (October 2008)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26 26 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) Phase III Large-Scale Field Test Decatur, Illinois October 2008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY U.S. Department of Energy MGSC Phase III National Energy Technology Laboratory Final Environmental Assessment ______________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents i October 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................

245

DOE-STD-3025-99 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

5-99 DOE-STD-3025-99 March 01, 1998 Quality Assurance Inspection and Testing of HEPA Filters Replaced by DOE-STD-3025-2007 | Superseding DOE NE F 3-43 (February 1990) This standard...

246

DOE-STD-3022-98 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

2-98 DOE-STD-3022-98 May 19, 1998 DOE HEPA Filter Test Program Cancelled | Superseding DOE NE F 3-42 (January 1987) This standard establishes essential elements of a Department of...

247

Regional Science Bowl | netl.doe.gov  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Regional Science Bowl West Virginia Regional Site SWPA Regional Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Science Bowl is a nationwide academic competition that tests...

248

DOE Onboarding  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

One-Year Passport to Success One-Year Passport to Success What is On-boarding? Orientation On-boarding  Transactional focus and goals  Less than one week  Executed by HR Office  Address new employee needs  Completed paperwork  Strategic focus and goals  Starts before first day through first year  Supervisor & Senior Leadership involvement  Integrate multiple offices, functions and individuals  Address employee needs  Maximizes employee engagement and retention 2 On-boarding Program Goals 3  Build and sustain high-performance culture by accelerating time for new employee to become productive  Create learning opportunities that allow new employees to successfully integrate into their new DOE organization  Provide employees with the tools and resources to

249

DOE 11  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE A ward N o.: D E--NT0005665 Final T echnical R eport (October 2 008 - S eptember 2 012) Source c haracterization a nd t emporal variation o f m ethane s eepage f rom thermokarst l akes o n t he A laska N orth S lope in r esponse t o A rctic c limate c hange Submitted b y: University o f A laska Fairbanks, A K 9 9775 Prepared for: United S tates D epartment o f E nergy National E nergy T echnology L aboratory May 29 th 2013 Office of Fossil Energy 2 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any

250

DOE Pulse  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

go! go! home about archives subscribe Profile Dr. Isaac Gamwo (left) works with Dr. Ward Burgess (right) at the National Energy Technology Laboratory. Photo Credit: NETL. The practical application of an elite researcher's life: Isaac K. Gamwo For a man whose expertise includes reactive multiphase fluid dynamics, complex fluid properties, and chemical looping combustion processes, Dr. Isaac Gamwo is surprisingly easy to comprehend. "The research we do in this lab is not confined to the world of academia," he notes, "it has tangible impacts on the way we produce energy." As senior research chemical engineer at DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Dr. Gamwo is currently focused on complex fluid properties at high temperatures and pressures. His recent work includes

251

DOE Code:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

we1rbox installatiOn we1rbox installatiOn ____:....;...=.~;;....:..;=-+- DOE Code: - - !- Project Lead: Wes R1esland NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY J 3-24-10 1 Date: Project Information 1. Project Overview What are tne enwonmental mpacts? Contractor~~ _ _ _ _ ] 11 The purpose of this project is to prepare a pad for a 90 ton crane to get 1nto positiOn and ng up so we can 1 set our new weir box into position We will widen the existing road around 20 feet at the north end and taper our fill to about5 feet at the south end for a total of about 200 feeL and budd a near level pad for them tong up the crane on We will use the d1rt from the hill irnrnedJateiy north of the work to oe done 2. 3 4 What*s the legal location? What IS the durabon of the prOJed?

252

DOE F  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

420.2 420.2 All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Burden Disclosure Statement Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Records Management Division, IM-11 GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20585; and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), Washington, DC 20503. U.S. Department of Energy Personal Property Loan Agreement DOE-PMR 109-1.5103 1. CONTROL

253

Active DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Active DOE Technical Standards Active DOE Technical Standards Document Number Document Title Responsible SLM DOE-HDBK-1001-96 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 DOE-HDBK-1003-96 DOE-HDBK-1010-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/4-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1015/1-93

254

SRC burn test in 700-hp oil-designed boiler. Annex Volume B. DOE-Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center report. Final technical report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Solvent Refined Coal (SRC) combustion tests were conducted at the U.S. Department of Energy's Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center. Combustion and flue-gas treatment of three different physical forms of SRC, as well as a No. 6 fuel oil, were evaluated. The three SRC fuels were (1) pulverized SRC Fuel; (2) SRC Residual Fuel Oil; and (3) SRC/Water Slurry. The SRC Residual Fuel Oil was a solution of SRC Fuel dissolved in heated process solvent. Approximately 500 tons of pulverized SRC Fuel and 30,000 gallons of SRC Residual Fuel Oil were combusted in a 700 hp (30 x 130 x 10/sup 6/ Btu/hr fuel input) oil-designed watertube package boiler. Sixty four-hour ASME combustion tests with three different SRC fuels were successfully concluded. The principal parameters evaluated were excess air levels and combustion air preheat temperature levels. Extensive data were collected on flue-gas levels of O/sub 2/, CO/sub 2/, CO, unburned hydrocarbons, SO/sub x/, NO/sub x/, uncontrolled particulates, uncontrolled opacity and carbon content of the flue-gas particulates. Boiler and combustion efficiencies were measured. The particulates were characterized via mass loadings, impactors, in-situ resistivity measurements, ultra-fine sampling, optical large particle sampling, five-stage cyclone sampling and chemical analysis of various cut sizes. A three-field pilot electrostatic precipitator (ESP) containing over 1000 square feet of plate collection area, a reverse air fabric filter pilot dust collector and a commercial pulse-jet fabric filter dust collector were operated at high collection efficiency. The results will be valuable in making recommendations for future tests and will provide a basis for conversion of industrial oil-fired boilers to SRC fuels. 11 references, 20 figures, 29 tables.

Not Available

1983-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

255

DOCUMENTATION OF NATIONAL WEATHER CONDITIONS AFFECTING LONG-TERM DEGRADATION OF COMMERCIAL SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL AND DOE SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL AND HIGH-LEVEL WASTE  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is preparing a proposal to construct, operate 2nd monitor, and eventually close a repository at Yucca Mountain in Nye County, Nevada, for the geologic disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW). As part of this effort, DOE has prepared a viability assessment and an assessment of potential consequences that may exist if the repository is not constructed. The assessment of potential consequences if the repository is not constructed assumes that all SNF and HLW would be left at the generator sites. These include 72 commercial generator sites (three commercial facility pairs--Salem and Hope Creek, Fitzpatrick and Nine Mile Point, and Dresden and Morris--would share common storage due to their close proximity to each other) and five DOE sites across the country. DOE analyzed the environmental consequences of the effects of the continued storage of these materials at these sites in a report titled Continued Storage Analysis Report (CSAR; Reference 1 ) . The CSAR analysis includes a discussion of the degradation of these materials when exposed to the environment. This document describes the environmental parameters that influence the degradation analyzed in the CSAR. These include temperature, relative humidity, precipitation chemistry (pH and chemical composition), annual precipitation rates, annual number of rain-days, and annual freeze/thaw cycles. The document also tabulates weather conditions for each storage site, evaluates the degradation of concrete storage modules and vaults in different regions of the country, and provides a thermal analysis of commercial SNF in storage.

W. L. Poe, Jr.; P.F. Wise

1998-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

DOE-SPEC-1142-2001 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DOE-SPEC-1142-2001 DOE-SPEC-1142-2001 May 07, 2001 Beryllium Lymphocyte Proliferation Testing This specification is for beryllium lymphocyte proliferation tests (BeLPT) used for...

257

DOE-HDBK-1204-97 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

4-97 DOE-HDBK-1204-97 July 26, 2005 Guide to Good Practices for the Development of Test Items Supersedes DOE-STD-1009-92 (July 1992) While the methodology used in developing test...

258

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INEEL/EXT-04-02423 INEEL/EXT-04-02423 ABB SCADA/EMS System INEEL Baseline Summary Test Report J. R. Davidson M. R. Permann B. L. Rolston S. J. Schaeffer November 2004 Prepared by: Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory INEEL/EXT-04-02423 ABB SCADA/EMS System INEEL Baseline Summary Test Report J. R. Davidson M. R. Permann B. L. Rolston S. J. Schaeffer November 2004 Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory INEEL National Security Division Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Assurance Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-99ID13727 ABB SCADA/EMS System INEEL Baseline Summary Test Report INEEL/EXT-04-02423 November 2004 ABSTRACT The Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory

259

DOE Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Review 2007 Review 2007 AWA Facility Update, High Gradient Wakefield Generation, and Future Upgrades Manoel Conde, Sergey Antipov, Felipe Franchini, Wei Gai, Feng Gao, Chunguang Jing, Richard Konecny, Wanming Liu, Jidong Long, John Power, Haitao Wang, Zikri Yusof Argonne Wakefield Accelerator Group High Energy Physics Division April 25 - 27, 2007 2 Outline Description of AWA Facililty. Wakefield structures built and tested. Measurements and simulations. List of next experiments to be performed. Plans for Facility upgrades. 3 AWA Drive Beamline Drive Gun Linac & Steering Coils Quads Wakefield Structure Experimental Chambers 4.5 m GV GV YAG1 YAG2 Spectrometer YAG5 Dump/ Faraday Cup Slits YAG4 YAG3 ICT1 ICT2 BPM Single bunch operation - Q=1-100 nC - Energy=15 MeV - High Current = 10 kAmp

260

DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Residential Water...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Water Heater and Certain Commercial Water Heater Test Procedures DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Residential Water Heater and Certain Commercial Water Heater Test...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

DOE response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed test procedure for residential clothes washers DOE response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed test...

262

DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Direct Heating...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Direct Heating Equipment and Pool Heater Test Procedures DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Direct Heating Equipment and Pool Heater Test Procedures October 24, 2013 -...

263

DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Commercial Refrigerati...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Test Procedure DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Test Procedure October 28, 2013 - 12:00am...

264

DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding the Compliance...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Regarding the Compliance Date for the Dehumidifier Test Procedure DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding the Compliance Date for the Dehumidifier Test Procedure...

265

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 433.1B, Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3.1B 3.1B MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES DOE O 433.1B Familiar Level August 2011 1 DOE O 433.1B MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What is the objective of DOE O 433.1B, Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities? 2. What is the purpose for quantitative indicators in maintenance management? 3. What are three types of environmental controls included in a maintenance shop? 4. What is the relationship between DOE G 433.1-1 and DOE O 433.1A? 5. What is the purpose for post-maintenance testing? 6. What is the objective of a good equipment maintenance history program?

266

Federal Substance Abuse Testing Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order establishes the requirements and responsibilities for the DOE Federal Substance Abuse Testing Program which covers drug and alcohol testing. Cancels DOE O 3792.3 Chg 1.

2014-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

267

DOE-FLEX: DOE's Telework Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes the requirements and responsibilities for the Departments telework program. Cancels DOE N 314.1.

2013-02-11T23:59:59.000Z

268

Unit Testing Discussion C  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Unit Testing Discussion C #12;Unit Test public Method is smallest unit of code Input/output transformation Test if the method does what it claims Not exactly black box testing #12;Test if (actual result Expected Computed Input #12;Functionality Computation ­ Easy to test Time based Asynchronous interaction

Massachusetts at Amherst, University of

269

The Cochliobolus carbonum SNF1 Gene Is Required for Cell Wall??Degrading Enzyme Expression and Virulence on Maize  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...XYL1 does not reduce growth on xylan or maize cell walls ( ). In...ccsnf1 mutant, yet growth on xylan is decreased by >60%. Similarly...enzymes needed for utilization of xylan or pectin, such as the enzymes...conceivably come from the plant leaf surface or epidermis, although the...

Nyerhovwo J. Tonukari; John S. Scott-Craig; Jonathan D. Waltonb

270

X-ray CT Observations of Methane Hydrate Distribution Changes over Time in a Natural Sediment Core from the BPX-DOE-USGS Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

When maintained under hydrate-stable conditions, methane hydrate in laboratory samples is often considered a stable and immobile solid material. Currently, there do not appear to be any studies in which the long-term redistribution of hydrates in sediments has been investigated in the laboratory. These observations are important because if the location of hydrate in a sample were to change over time (e.g. by dissociating at one location and reforming at another), the properties of the sample that depend on hydrate saturation and pore space occupancy would also change. Observations of hydrate redistribution under stable conditions are also important in understanding natural hydrate deposits, as these may also change over time. The processes by which solid hydrate can move include dissociation, hydrate-former and water migration in the gas and liquid phases, and hydrate formation. Chemical potential gradients induced by temperature, pressure, and pore water or host sediment chemistry can drive these processes. A series of tests were performed on a formerly natural methane-hydrate-bearing core sample from the BPX-DOE-USGS Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, in order to observe hydrate formation and morphology within this natural sediment, and changes over time using X-ray computed tomography (CT). Long-term observations (over several weeks) of methane hydrate in natural sediments were made to investigate spatial changes in hydrate saturation in the core. During the test sequence, mild buffered thermal and pressure oscillations occurred within the sample in response to laboratory temperature changes. These oscillations were small in magnitude, and conditions were maintained well within the hydrate stability zone.

Kneafsey, T.J.; Rees, E.V.L.

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

271

About / FAQ | DOE PAGES  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

transition to a full release. DOE PAGESBeta represents DOE's response to the February 2013 Office of Science and Technology Policy memorandum that called on federal agencies to...

272

Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3020-2005 DOE-STD-3020-2005 December 2005 Supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FOREWARD This U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. This standard was developed primarily for application in DOE programs. It provides guidance to DOE contractors for procurement and required testing of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters used in DOE nuclear facilities. Required testing is performed by the filter manufacturer and

273

Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3020-2005 DOE-STD-3020-2005 December 2005 Supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FOREWARD This U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. This standard was developed primarily for application in DOE programs. It provides guidance to DOE contractors for procurement and required testing of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters used in DOE nuclear facilities. Required testing is performed by the filter manufacturer and

274

To: Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

'J| 'J| MaryBeth Zinmerman 0212212001 10:37 AM ',U To: Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE cc: Nancy Jeffery/EE/DOE@DOE Subject: Old Chpt 2, new Chap 3 Can you work on answering the editor's questions on this? Forwarded by MaryBeth Zimmenman/EE/DOE on 22/2001 10:36 AM "'"- . . Michael York 02/21/2001 01:13 PM To: commcoll@aol.com cc: MaryBeth Zimmerman/EE/DOE@DOE Subject: Chapter 2 Joan, attached is the first chapter to edit. We will be sending you the next chapter as soon as it is available. If you have any questions, please call me at (202) 586-5669. Thanks! Michael York Chapter 2_Energy Impacts_2.16.01.d 22894 DOE024-0300 JOEL RUBIN 02/22/2001 03:00 PM To: Marybeth Zimmerman cc: Nancy Jeffery, Darrell Beschen/EE/DOE@DOE, Michael York Subject Chapter 2 Updates MBZ - This draft incorporates (in blue ink) updates based upon the comments from Joan. Ive deleted Joan's

275

DOE-HDBK-1203-97 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-HDBK-1204-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEST ITEMS,DOE-HDBK-1205-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT DOE-STD-1037-93 DOE-HDBK-1080-97...

276

Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING NNSA) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING NNSA) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES The familiar level of this module is divided into two sections. In the first section, we will discuss the objective, requirements, and the responsibilities assigned to the heads of field elements. In the second section, we will discuss the content of attachment 1, Functional Area Requirements. We have provided examples and a practice to help familiarize you with the material. The practice will also help prepare you for the criterion test. DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 440.1B, Worker Protection Management for DOE (Including the National Nuclear Security Administration) Federal

277

High Burnup Dry Storage Cask Research and Development Project, Final Test Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

EPRI is leading a project team to develop and implement the first five years of a Test Plan to collect data from a SNF dry storage system containing high burnup fuel.12 The Test Plan defined in this document outlines the data to be collected, and the storage system design, procedures, and licensing necessary to implement the Test Plan.13 The main goals of the proposed test are to provide confirmatory data14 for models, future SNF dry storage cask design, and to support license renewals and new licenses for ISFSIs. To provide data that is most relevant to high burnup fuel in dry storage, the design of the test storage system must mimic real conditions that high burnup SNF experiences during all stages of dry storage: loading, cask drying, inert gas backfilling, and transfer to the ISFSI for multi-year storage.15 Along with other optional modeling, SETs, and SSTs, the data collected in this Test Plan can be used to evaluate the integrity of dry storage systems and the high burnup fuel contained therein over many decades. It should be noted that the Test Plan described in this document discusses essential activities that go beyond the first five years of Test Plan implementation.16 The first five years of the Test Plan include activities up through loading the cask, initiating the data collection, and beginning the long-term storage period at the ISFSI. The Test Plan encompasses the overall project that includes activities that may not be completed until 15 or more years from now, including continued data collection, shipment of the Research Project Cask to a Fuel Examination Facility, opening the cask at the Fuel Examination Facility, and examining the high burnup fuel after the initial storage period.

none,

2014-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

278

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18,...

279

Packaging Strategies for Criticality Safety for "Other" DOE Fuels in a Repository  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Since 1998, there has been an ongoing effort to gain acceptance of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-owned spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in the national repository. To accomplish this goal, the fuel matrix was used as a discriminating feature to segregate fuels into nine distinct groups. From each of those groups, a characteristic fuel was selected and analyzed for criticality safety based on a proposed packaging strategy. This report identifies and quantifies the important criticality parameters for the canisterized fuels within each criticality group to: (1) demonstrate how the other fuels in the group are bounded by the baseline calculations or (2) allow identification of individual type fuels that might require special analysis and packaging.

Larry L Taylor

2004-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 263: Area 25 Building 4839 Leachfields, Nevada Test Site, Revision 0, DOE/NV--535 UPDATED WITH RECORD OF TECHNICAL CHANGE No.1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 263, the Area 25 Building 4839 Leachfield, has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office; the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; and the US Department of Defense. Corrective Action Unit 263 is comprised of the Corrective Action Site 25-05-04 sanitary leachfield and associated collection system. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan is used in combination with the Work Plan for Leachfield Corrective Action Units: Nevada Test Site and Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1998d). The Leachfield Work Plan was developed to streamline investigations at Leachfield Corrective Action Units by incorporating management, technical, quality assurance, health and safety, public involvement, field sampling, and waste management information common to a set of Corrective Action Units with similar site histories and characteristics into a single document that can be referenced. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan provides investigative details specific to Corrective Action Unit 263. Corrective Action Unit 263 is located southwest of Building 4839, in the Central Propellant Storage Area. Operations in Building 4839 from 1968 to 1996 resulted in effluent releases to the leachfield and associated collection system. In general, effluent released to the leachfield consisted of sanitary wastewater from a toilet, urinal, lavatory, and drinking fountain located within Building 4839. The subsurface soils in the vicinity of the collection system and leachfield may have been impacted by effluent containing contaminants of potential concern generated by support activities associated with the Building 4839 operations.

US DOE Nevada Operations Office

1999-04-12T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

DOE Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE Lessons Learned Information Services Catches the Eye of Corporations and Educational Institutions

282

DOE Approved Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE.

283

DOE International Energy Advisors  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOEs Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's (OE) Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration Division (ISER) has coordinated and executed interagency support agreements with five of the geographic Combatant Commands to assign a DOE representative a DOE Energy Advisor to each of their headquarters.

284

DOE-FLEX: DOE's Telework Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The directive establishes the requirements and responsibilities for the Departments telework program. Canceled by DOE O 314.1.

2011-07-05T23:59:59.000Z

285

DOE-HDBK-1204-97 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-97 4-97 DOE-HDBK-1204-97 July 26, 2005 Guide to Good Practices for the Development of Test Items Supersedes DOE-STD-1009-92 (July 1992) While the methodology used in developing test items can vary significantly, to ensure quality examinations, test items should be developed systematically. Test design and development is discussed in the DOE Guide to Good Practices for Design, Development, and Implementation of Examinations. DOE-HDBK-1204-97, Guide to Good Practices for the Development of Test Items More Documents & Publications Order Module--DOE-HDBK-1203-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING OF TECHNICAL STAFF AND MANAGERS, DOE-HDBK-1204-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEST ITEMS,DOE-HDBK-1205-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT

286

DOE Roadmap: Chapter 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Chapter 1. Overview of the DOE Project Chapter 1. Overview of the DOE Project Introduction On April 10, 1945, medical staff of the U.S. Manhattan Engineer District in Oak Ridge, TN, injected plutonium into the victim of a car accident. American scientists had only recently begun producing plutonium, and thousands of workers were laboring to produce the quantities required for the first atomic bombs. While aware that plutonium was hazardous, project officials were uncertain how much exposure would cause harm. Desire for information about human metabolism and retention of plutonium led to this first injection in Oak Ridge. Over the next 2 years, 17 other people also received plutonium injections. The Manhattan Project and its postwar successor, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), also carried out human experiments with uranium, polonium, americium, and other radioactive substances. Radiation tests continued after the war; some of these studies took place under AEC supervision and had direct defense-related applications. The agency also sponsored substantial programs in the medical applications of radiation and in basic biomedical research. In addition, independent physicians and researchers at universities and hospitals conducted many postwar human radiation studies to develop the techniques of present-day nuclear medicine.

287

Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205851.800.dial.DOE en DOE-STD-1150-2013 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-1150-2013 doe-std-1150-2013" class="title-link">DOE-STD-1150-2013

288

Hydrogen Storage Testing and Analysis Research and Development...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

DOE R&D Activities Hydrogen Storage Testing and Analysis Research and Development Hydrogen Storage Testing and Analysis Research and Development DOE's hydrogen storage R&D...

289

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INL/EXT-08-13979 INL/EXT-08-13979 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Enhancing control systems security in the energy sector NSTB National SCADA Test Bed Common Cyber Security Vulnerabilities Observed in Control System Assessments by the INL NSTB Program November 2008 November 2008 INL/EXT-08-13979 Common Cyber Security Vulnerabilities Observed in Control System Assessments by the INL NSTB Program November 2008 Idaho National Laboratory Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 http://www.inl.gov Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 Common Cyber Security Vulnerabilities Observed in Control System Assessments by the INL NSTB

290

DOE-STD-3026-99 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

6-99 DOE-STD-3026-99 February 24, 2009 Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan Superseding DOE NE F 3-44 July 1986 This standard was developed primarily for application in U.S....

291

DOE-STD-1065-94 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5-94 DOE-STD-1065-94 June 13, 1996 Guideline to Good Practices for Postmaintenance Testing at DOE Nuclear Facilities Canceled This guide is intended to assist facility maintenance...

292

U.S. DOE Collegiate Wind Competition  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. DOE Collegiate Wind Competition challenges teams to design a wind-driven system based on market research, develop a business plan to market the product, build and test the system against...

293

LG to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Clothes Washers LG response to DOE's request for information regarding alternative test procedures for large-capacity clothes washer models, December 7, 2010. After DOE...

294

Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

ehss908241 Approved DOE Technical Standards en DOE-STD-3009-2014 http:energy.govehssdownloadsdoe-std-3009-2014

295

DOE G 414  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE)...

296

2012 DOE Sustainability Awards  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

In 2012, DOE Sustainability Awards recognized 20 teams and individuals representing DOE national laboratories for their outstanding sustainability contributions, including accomplishments in managing pollution, waste, energy, water, and vehicle fleets.

297

Completed DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Completed) Completed) Project Number Title Document ID SLM / ORG Author / Phone / Email Status / Review Date P1020-2002REV National Phenomena hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for DOE Facilities DOE-STD-1020-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30) P1066-1999REV Fire Protection and Emergency Services Program and Design Criteria (revision to DOE-STD-1066-99) DOE-STD-1066-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30)

298

Extension of DOE Directives  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Notice extends the following directives until 2/16/04: DOE N 205.2, Foreign National Access to DOE Cyber Systems, and DOE N 205.3, Password Generation, Protection, and Use, dated 11/23/99-7/1/00.

2003-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

299

EFCOG / DOE Electrical Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of electrical hazards used in the DOE Electrical Safety Handbook and laboratory programs. Thus, portionsEFCOG / DOE Electrical Safety Improvement Project Project Area 4 ­Performance Measurement personnel. This tool is also intended to assist DOE organizations in determining and classifying ORPS

300

DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-1092 and others guidance for the "Analyze the Hazard" step of DOE's Integrated Safety Management (ISM

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Experience With Damaged Spent Nuclear Fuel at U.S. DOE Facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes some of the challenges encountered and solutions implemented to ensure safe storage and handling of damaged spent nuclear fuels (SNF). It includes a brief summary of some SNF storage environments and resulting SNF degradation, experience with handling and repackaging significantly degraded SNFs, and the associated lessons learned. This work provides useful insight and resolutions to many engineering challenges facing SNF handling and storage facilities. The context of this report is taken from a report produced at Idaho National Laboratory and further detailed information, such as equipment design and usage, can be found in the appendices to that report. (authors)

Carlsen, Brett; Fillmore, Denzel; Woolstenhulme, Eric [Idaho National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, ID 83415 (United States); McCormack, Roger L. [Fluor Hanford Site, Richland, Wash. (United States); Sindelar, Robert; Spieker, Timothy [Savannah River National Laboratory, Savannah River Site Aiken, SC 29808 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

A Joint Theory and Experimental Project in the Synthesis and Testing of Porous COFs for Onboard Vehicular Hydrogen Storage - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Omar M. Yaghi Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of California - Los Angeles 607 Charles E. Young Drive East Los Angeles, CA 90095 Phone: (310) 206-0398 Email: yaghi@chem.ucla.edu DOE Managers HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov GO: Katie Randolph Phone: (720) 356-1759 Email: Katie.Randolph@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FG36-08GO18141 Project Start Date: September 1, 2008 Project End Date: July 31, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Design optimal frameworks with potential metal binding * sites for metal impregnation. Predict H * 2 uptake isotherm for designed frameworks using our newly developed force field.

303

DOE ISM CHAMPIONS  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9/27/12 9/27/12 DOE ISM CHAMPIONS Organization Points of Contact Phone E-mail DOE ISM Co- Champion (HSS) Pat Worthington (301) 903-5926 pat.worthington@hq.doe.gov DOE ISM Co- Champion (EM) Ray Corey (509) 376-0108 ray_j_corey@rl.gov Ames Cindy Baebler (630) 252-1563 cynthia.baebler@ch.doe.gov Argonne Joanna M. Livengood (630) 252-2366 joanna.livengood@ch.doe.gov Brookhaven Bob Desmarais (631) 344-5434 rdesmarais@bnl.gov CBFO Josef A. Sobieraj (575) 234-7499 Josef.sobieraj@wipp.ws CDNS Don F. Nichols (202) 586-8216 don.nichols@nnsa.doe.gov Chicago Justin Zamirowski (630) 252-2248 justin.zamirowski@ch.doe.gov CNS-Energy Chip Lagdon (301) 903-4218 (202) 586-0799 chip.lagdon@hq.doe.gov EE Gary Staffo (202) 586-9577 gary.staffo@ee.doe.gov EM James A. Hutton (202) 586-0975 james.hutton@em.doe.gov

304

DOE Patents Database - FAQ's  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Why was this database developed and by whom? How is this collection different than the one at the United States Patent and Trademark Office? What are the criteria for including patent records in this collection? How do you determine these patents were sponsored by DOE? How many patents are in this collection? Does the collection include all of DOE's patents? Does this collection include the full text for each patent? What time frame is covered by DOepatents? How often is this collection and Web site updated? Does the U.S. Government have exclusive rights to these inventions? What is OSTI? Where can I find information about doing business with DOE? How can I find additional information on the patenting process? Where can I find patents that are not related to DOE?

305

DOE Information Center  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Information Center DOE Information Center The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Center provides citizens a consolidated facility to obtain information and records related to the DOE's various programs in Oak Ridge and abroad. Employees at the DOE Information Center are available to assist with your requests and searches from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EST), Monday through Friday, except for federal holidays. Requests Documents can be requested in person or by telephone, email, or fax. Reproduction Please allow DOE Information Center staff adequate time to reproduce documents. Some material requires special handling, security reviews, etc. Delivery Unless special arrangements have been made with DOE Information Center staff, documents should be picked up during normal business hours.

306

DOE Issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Improve Energy Efficiency...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

DOE Institutes Enforcement Action Against AeroSys, Inc. for Failure to Certify Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Department of Energy Announces Testing for AeroSys, Inc....

307

DOE-STD-3003-2000 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

of this Standard is to document good engineering practices for the installation, testing, and maintenance of BACKUP POWER SOURCES at DOE facilities. The term "BACKUP POWER...

308

DOE-STD-3020-2005 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Supersedes DOE NE F3-45 (January 1987) This standard establishes specification and testing requirements for High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters procured to provide...

309

DOE Initiates Enforcement Actions Against 4 Showerhead Manufacturers...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Against 4 Showerhead Manufacturers (Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty and Requests for Test Data Issued) DOE Initiates Enforcement Actions Against 4 Showerhead Manufacturers...

310

DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity Advisory Committee DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity Advisory Committee January 15, 2009 -...

311

Record of Decision for the Department of Energy's Waste Management Program: Treatment and Disposal of Low-Level Waste and Mixed Low-Level Waste; Amendment of the Record of Decision for the Nevada Test Site (DOE/EIS-0200) (DOE/EIS-0243) (2/25/00)_  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

061 061 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2000 / Notices 1 After the Final WM PEIS was issued in May 1997, DOE issued ''Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure.'' In that document, DOE provided estimates of waste volumes that would result from the planned operations and accelerated cleanup processes at DOE sites. Because some of the estimates differed from those provided in the WM PEIS, DOE examined the LLW and MLLW volumes to determine if the updated volume estimates constitute significant new information relevant to environmental concerns that would warrant preparation of a supplemental EIS or a new PEIS. This examination extended only to LLW and MLLW volumes, because the transuranic, hazardous and high-level waste volume estimates did not change

312

Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

40.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE 40.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING NNSA) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING NNSA) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES The familiar level of this module is divided into two sections. In the first section, we will discuss the objective, requirements, and the responsibilities assigned to the heads of field elements. In the second section, we will discuss the content of attachment 1, Functional Area Requirements. We have provided examples and a practice to help familiarize you with the material. The practice will also help prepare you for the criterion test. DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 440.1B, Worker Protection Management for DOE (Including the National Nuclear Security Administration) Federal Employees

313

Phase Startup Initiative Phases 3 and 4 Test Plan and Test Specification ( OCRWM)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Construction for the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project facilities is continuing per the Level III Baseline Schedule, and installation of the Fuel Retrieval System (FRS) and Integrated Water Treatment System (IWTS) in K West Basin is now complete. In order to accelerate the project, a phased start up strategy to initiate testing of the FRS and IWTS early in the overall project schedule was proposed (Williams 1999). Wilkinson (1999) expands the definition of the original proposal into four functional testing phases of the Phased Startup Initiative (PSI). Phases 1 and 2 are based on performing functional tests using dummy fuel. This test plan provides overall guidance for Phase 3 and 4 tests, which are performed using actual irradiated N fuel assemblies. The overall objective of the Phase 3 and 4 testing is to verify how the FRS and IWTS respond while processing actual fuel. Conducting these tests early in the project schedule will allow identification and resolution of equipment and process problems before they become activities on the start-up critical path. The specific objectives of this test plan are to: Define the Phase 3 and 4 test scope for the FRS and IWTS; Provide detailed test requirements that can be used to write the specific test procedures; Define data required and measurements to be taken. Where existing methods to obtain these do not exist, enough detail will be provided to define required additional equipment; and Define specific test objectives and acceptance criteria.

PAJUNEN, A.L.; LANGEVIN, M.J.

2000-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

314

DOE Science Showcase - Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases Search Results from DOE Databases View research documents, citations, accomplishments, patents, and projects related to climate change, one of the primary scientific challenges addressed through the Incite Program. Climate Change Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Climate Modeling Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Ocean Turbulence and Climate Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Cloud Simulation and Models Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Global Warming Information Bridge Energy Citations Database

315

DOE G 414  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INITIATED BY: INITIATED BY: http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

316

DOE G 414  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

317

DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy. doeresponseschallengehomecomments.pdf More Documents & Publications Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) DOE...

318

Test Automation Test Automation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Test Automation Test Automation Mohammad Mousavi Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands Software Testing 2013 Mousavi: Test Automation #12;Test Automation Outline Test Automation Mousavi: Test Automation #12;Test Automation Why? Challenges of Manual Testing Test-case design: Choosing inputs

Mousavi, Mohammad

319

Commercial Equipment Testing Enforcement Policies  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

In an exercise of its enforcement discretion, under specific conditions, DOE will not perform assessment testing, verification testing, or enforcement testing on units of certain types of commercial equipment if the manufacturer distributes in commerce an otherwise identical unit that does not have that feature.

320

DOE Closes Investigation of Arcelik's Blomberg Refrigerator | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Arcelik's Blomberg Refrigerator Arcelik's Blomberg Refrigerator DOE Closes Investigation of Arcelik's Blomberg Refrigerator September 1, 2010 - 4:37pm Addthis The Department of Energy has closed its investigation into the energy efficiency of Arcelik's Blomberg refrigerator-freezer model # BRFB1450. The Department opened this investigation based on a complaint. DOE subpoenaed information from Arcelik, reviewed Arcelik's response, and performed its own testing of this model. Based on our investigation and test results, DOE has determined this model to be compliant with federal energy conservation standards. Notice of Compliance Determination Addthis Related Articles DOE Opens Three Investigations into Alleged Refrigerator Efficiency Violations DOE Closes Investigation of Whirlpool's Maytag Refrigerator

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

JGI - DOE Mission Relevance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

User Programs User Programs Project Management Office Community Science Program Emerging Technologies Opportunity Program Technology Development Pilot Program Genomic Encyc. of Bacteria and Archaea MyJGI: Information for Collaborators DOE Mission Relevance CSP | Overview | How to Propose a Project | Review Process | DOE Relevance Proposal Schedule | FAQ The Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (DOE JGI) is managed by the Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research (OBER) to produce high-throughput DNA sequencing and analysis in support of its missions in alternative energy, global carbon cycling, and biogeochemistry. These areas mirror DOE and national priorities to develop abundant sources of clean energy, to control greenhouse gas accumulation in

322

DOE Public Reading Room  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

environmental and waste management, and site-specific concerns. The INL Research Library provides access to information, staffing, and research assistance for the DOE Reading...

323

Energy Innovations DOE Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Leo Breton, representing Energy Innovations of Washington, DC, a small company engaged in improving the energy efficiency of appliances, automobiles, and HVAC systems, requested a meeting with DOE...

324

DOE MENTOR-PROTG  

Energy Savers [EERE]

provided. * Equipping small businesses and minority institutions of higher with the knowledge, skills and capabilities needed to successfully compete for DOE prime contracts. *...

325

DOE General Competencies  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The DOE General Competencies are the personal and professional attributes that are critical to successful performance. A competency model is a collection of competencies that together define...

326

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

work order DOE Department of Energy EMC electromagnetic compatibility EMI electromagnetic interference EPRI Electric Power Research Institute eWP electronic work package HVAC...

327

the DOE ISMS Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

* Corrective action management * Environmental management * Commercial grade dedication * Conduct of operations "This ISMS review by DOE goes beyond ensuring that we have a...

328

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

procedures CBWO computer-based work order CCV correct component verification CNS Catawba Nuclear Station DOE Department of Energy HVAC heating, venting, and air conditioning I&C...

329

DOE Corporate Overview - 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy, 2012 Section One, page 1 U.S. Department of Energy, 2012 Section One, page 1 SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Welcome to the Department of Energy. This book provides an overview of the Department of Energy (DOE). The opening sections describe the mission areas, organizational structure and upcoming critical issues of the Department, followed by brief descriptions of DOE's goals and programs. Later sections provide overviews of the Department's budget, staffing, contract management, project management, Congressional jurisdiction, Government Accountability Office (GAO) and DOE's Inspector General (IG) oversight and DOE high-visibility

330

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

"Heat Transport System Components Engineering Test Plan" (Rev. 1, 063010) Table 8, Small scale and circulating loop tests - Mechanical performance testing of IHX...

331

2012 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan 2012 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan The 2012 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan embodies DOE's...

332

DOE standard: Radiological control  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed this Standard to assist line managers in meeting their responsibilities for implementing occupational radiological control programs. DOE has established regulatory requirements for occupational radiation protection in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 835 (10 CFR 835), ``Occupational Radiation Protection``. Failure to comply with these requirements may lead to appropriate enforcement actions as authorized under the Price Anderson Act Amendments (PAAA). While this Standard does not establish requirements, it does restate, paraphrase, or cite many (but not all) of the requirements of 10 CFR 835 and related documents (e.g., occupational safety and health, hazardous materials transportation, and environmental protection standards). Because of the wide range of activities undertaken by DOE and the varying requirements affecting these activities, DOE does not believe that it would be practical or useful to identify and reproduce the entire range of health and safety requirements in this Standard and therefore has not done so. In all cases, DOE cautions the user to review any underlying regulatory and contractual requirements and the primary guidance documents in their original context to ensure that the site program is adequate to ensure continuing compliance with the applicable requirements. To assist its operating entities in achieving and maintaining compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835, DOE has established its primary regulatory guidance in the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides. This Standard supplements the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides and serves as a secondary source of guidance for achieving compliance with 10 CFR 835.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

DOE Radiation Records Contacts List  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE radiation records contact list for individuals to obtain records of occupational exposure directly from a DOE site.

334

Battery systems performance studies - HIL components testing...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

systems performance studies - HIL components testing Battery systems performance studies - HIL components testing 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual...

335

Vehicle & Systems Simulation & Testing | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Vehicle & Systems Simulation & Testing Vehicle & Systems Simulation & Testing 2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and...

336

Advanced Vehicle Testing & Evaluation | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Vehicle Testing & Evaluation Advanced Vehicle Testing & Evaluation 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

337

Life Validation Testing Protocol Development | Department of...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Validation Testing Protocol Development Life Validation Testing Protocol Development Presentation from the U.S. DOE Office of Vehicle Technologies "Mega" Merit Review 2008 on...

338

Standards and Test Procedures | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appliance & Equipment Standards Standards and Test Procedures Standards and Test Procedures The Department of Energy (DOE) establishes energy efficiency standards for certain...

339

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers After granting several waivers establishing an alternative test procedure for residential clothes washers, DOE sought the views of interested parties regarding the proper implementation of these waivers. Whirlpool responded to the DOE's inquiry with a number of comments to recommend a course of

340

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers After granting several waivers establishing an alternative test procedure for residential clothes washers, DOE sought the views of interested parties regarding the proper implementation of these waivers. Whirlpool responded to the DOE's inquiry with a number of comments to recommend a course of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

PHEV development test platform Utilization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PHEV development test platform Utilization vssp07lohsebusch DOE Merit Review May 19, 2009 Henning Lohse-Busch, Neeraj Shidore, Richard Carlson, Thomas Wallner Mike Duoba,...

342

DOE CORPORATE REPORTING  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7/23/2010 7/23/2010 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) CORPORATE REPORTING To ensure projects are effectively managed and delivering on the goals of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act), DOE will collect data on project management and execution, risk management, job creation, and key project milestones, in addition to what is required by Section 1512 of the Recovery Act. In most cases, monthly data will be used internally for managerial purposes only, but where DOE does intend to publicize monthly data, it will clearly indicate it to be "preliminary/informal and subject to change." Recipients are required to provide DOE information on, but not limited to, the following issues:

343

DOE Patents Database - Widget  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Get the DOepatents Widget... Get the DOepatents Widget... Download the DOepatents widget to find DOE patent data, read news about DOE inventions, and browse the most-viewed patents. You may download and install this widget using the html inclusion code. Get the DOepatents widget and many other great free widgets at Widgetbox! Not seeing a widget? (More info) Widget Features Search: Find patent information resulting from DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) dating from the 1940s to today. Most Viewed: Browse the most frequently viewed patent records. News: Read about highlighted DOE inventions and inventors. Featured: View recently issued patents and patents owned exclusively by DOE. Contact: Send comments or questions about this collection. XML: Link directly to the DOepatents XML data service, with help and

344

DOE Grids Service Transition  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Grids Service Transition DOE Grids Service Transition Services Overview ECS Audio/Video Conferencing Fasterdata IPv6 Network Network Performance Tools (perfSONAR) ESnet OID Registry PGP Key Service Virtual Circuits (OSCARS) DOE Grids Service Transition Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net DOE Grids Service Transition Background ESnet has decided to transition support and management for the certificate services provided by the DOE Grids public key infrastructure (PKI) to the Open Sciences Grid (OSG). OSG and ESnet provide service to many of the same user communities, and have long been collaborators in the areas of identity

345

DOE Patents Database - About  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

About DOepatents About DOepatents DOepatents, developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), is a searchable database of patent information resulting from DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D). Included here are patents that DOE sponsored through a variety of funding mechanisms, including grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements. Comprehensive coverage of DOE patent information is one way to demonstrate the Department's contribution to scientific progress in the physical sciences and other disciplines. Publicly available patent information from DOE R&D, historic and current, is presented here, excluding patent applications. DOepatents consists of bibliographic records, with full text where available, either via a PDF file or an HTML link to the record at the

346

DOE Energy Innovation Hubs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Research » DOE Energy Research » DOE Energy Innovation Hubs Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Materials Sciences & Engineering (MSE) Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences (CSGB) Accelerator and Detector Research Research Conduct Policies DOE Energy Innovation Hubs Energy Frontier Research Centers National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) News & Resources Contact Information Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-22/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3081 F: (301) 903-6594 E: sc.bes@science.doe.gov More Information » Research DOE Energy Innovation Hubs Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds

347

DOE-2 basics  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE-2 provides the building design and research communities with an up-to-date, unbiased, well-documented public-domain computer program for building energy analysis. DOE-2 predicts the hourly energy use and energy cost of a building given hourly weather information and a description of the building and its HVAC equipment and utility rate structure. DOE-2 is a portable FORTRAN program that can be used on a large variety of computers, including PC's. Using DOE-2, designers can determine the choice of building parameters that improve energy efficiency while maintaining thermal comfort. The purpose of DOE-2 is to aid in the analysis of energy usage in buildings; it is not intended to be the sole source of information relied upon for the design of buildings. The judgment and experience of the architect/engineer still remain the most important elements of building design.

Not Available

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

DOE-2 basics  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE-2 provides the building design and research communities with an up-to-date, unbiased, well-documented public-domain computer program for building energy analysis. DOE-2 predicts the hourly energy use and energy cost of a building given hourly weather information and a description of the building and its HVAC equipment and utility rate structure. DOE-2 is a portable FORTRAN program that can be used on a large variety of computers, including PC`s. Using DOE-2, designers can determine the choice of building parameters that improve energy efficiency while maintaining thermal comfort. The purpose of DOE-2 is to aid in the analysis of energy usage in buildings; it is not intended to be the sole source of information relied upon for the design of buildings. The judgment and experience of the architect/engineer still remain the most important elements of building design.

Not Available

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

"DOE O 450.2 INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND DOE P 450.4A INTEGRATED  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

"DOE O 450.2 INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND DOE P 450.4A "DOE O 450.2 INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND DOE P 450.4A INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT POLICY FAMILIAR LEVEL "DOE O 450.2 INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND DOE P 450.4A INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT POLICY FAMILIAR LEVEL "The familiar level of this module is divided into two sections. In the first section, we will discuss the additions to DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual, which has been replaced by DOE O 450.2, Integrated Safety Management. In the second section, we will discuss the additions to DOE P 450.4, Integrated Safety Management Policy. We have provided examples and a practice to help familiarize you with the material. The practice will also help prepare you for the criterion test. Before continuing, you should obtain a copy of all the resources listed for

350

http://emdev.apps.em.doe.gov/EMDEV/Pages/groundwaterReport.aspx  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Central Nevada Test Area Responsible DOE Office: Office of Legacy Management Plume Name: Central Nevada Test Area Remediation Contractor: SM Stoller Corporation Report Last...

351

Solid-State Lighting: DOE Hosts Solid-State Lighting Commercial Product  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Hosts Solid-State Lighting DOE Hosts Solid-State Lighting Commercial Product Testing Program Workshop to someone by E-mail Share Solid-State Lighting: DOE Hosts Solid-State Lighting Commercial Product Testing Program Workshop on Facebook Tweet about Solid-State Lighting: DOE Hosts Solid-State Lighting Commercial Product Testing Program Workshop on Twitter Bookmark Solid-State Lighting: DOE Hosts Solid-State Lighting Commercial Product Testing Program Workshop on Google Bookmark Solid-State Lighting: DOE Hosts Solid-State Lighting Commercial Product Testing Program Workshop on Delicious Rank Solid-State Lighting: DOE Hosts Solid-State Lighting Commercial Product Testing Program Workshop on Digg Find More places to share Solid-State Lighting: DOE Hosts Solid-State Lighting Commercial Product Testing Program Workshop on

352

Electrolux Gibson Air Conditioner and Equator Clothes Washer Fail DOE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electrolux Gibson Air Conditioner and Equator Clothes Washer Fail Electrolux Gibson Air Conditioner and Equator Clothes Washer Fail DOE Energy Star Testing Electrolux Gibson Air Conditioner and Equator Clothes Washer Fail DOE Energy Star Testing October 6, 2010 - 10:08am Addthis DOE testing in support of the ENERGY STAR program has revealed that an Electrolux Gibson air conditioner (model GAH105Q2T1) and an Equator clothes washer (model EZ 3720 CEE), both of which claimed ENERGY STAR ratings, do not meet the ENERGY STAR requirements. Specifically, the test results for the Electrolux Gibson model show that, when tested in accordance with DOE's test procedures, it consumed 6.1 percent more energy than the Energy Star requirement. Test results for the Equator model show that it exceeds Energy Star's water factor requirements by 12.3 percent.

353

Electrolux Gibson Air Conditioner and Equator Clothes Washer Fail DOE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electrolux Gibson Air Conditioner and Equator Clothes Washer Fail Electrolux Gibson Air Conditioner and Equator Clothes Washer Fail DOE Energy Star Testing Electrolux Gibson Air Conditioner and Equator Clothes Washer Fail DOE Energy Star Testing October 6, 2010 - 10:08am Addthis DOE testing in support of the ENERGY STAR program has revealed that an Electrolux Gibson air conditioner (model GAH105Q2T1) and an Equator clothes washer (model EZ 3720 CEE), both of which claimed ENERGY STAR ratings, do not meet the ENERGY STAR requirements. Specifically, the test results for the Electrolux Gibson model show that, when tested in accordance with DOE's test procedures, it consumed 6.1 percent more energy than the Energy Star requirement. Test results for the Equator model show that it exceeds Energy Star's water factor requirements by 12.3 percent.

354

geothermal_test.cdr  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Energy (DOE) became the exclusive operator of the site, which was called the Geothermal Test Facility, and negotiated a right-of-way agreement with BLM to operate the facility....

355

DOE Policies | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Policies DOE Policies DOE Policies Cyber Security DOE O 205.1B Department of Energy Cyber Security Management (Approved May 16, 2011) Information Management Planning DOE Guide to IT Capital Planning and Investment, September 2010 (pdf) DOE IRM Strategic Plan, FY 2009 - 2011 (pdf) DOE N 203.1, Software Quality Assurance (pdf) DOE G 242.1-1, Forms Management Guide (pdf) DOE O 203.1 Limited Personal Use of Government Office Equipment Including Information Technology (pdf) Information Management Program Order, DOE O 200.1A (pdf) (Access to this document is restricted to DOE employees only) Records Management DOE Directive, O 243.1, Records Management Program (pdf) DOE Directive, O 243.2, Vital Records (pdf) DOE Directive, O 200.2, Information Collection Management Program

356

DOE ORP Contracting Officer Representatives - Hanford Site  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE ORP Contracting Officer Representatives DOE - ORP ContractsProcurements ORP Contracts & Procurements Home DOE-ORP Contract Management Plans DOE-ORP Prime Contracts DOE-ORP...

357

DOE - ORP Contracts/Procurements - Hanford Site  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Procurements Home DOE-ORP Contract Management Plans DOE-ORP Prime Contracts DOE-ORP Contracting Officers DOE ORP Contracting Officer Representatives DOE ORP Purchase Card Buyers...

358

DOE G 200  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

G 200.1-1A G 200.1-1A Department of Energy (DOE) Systems Engineering Methodology Version 3 The DOE Systems Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for Information Technology Investments September 2002 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of the Chief Information Officer Date: September 2002 Page Rev Date: i TITLE PAGE Document Name: Department of Energy Systems Engineering Methodology (SEM) The DOE Systems Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for Information Technology Investments Publication Date: Original March 1996; Revised November 1997 Version 2 March 1999 Version 3 September 2002 Approval: ___________________________________ Karen Evans, Chief Information Officer ___________________________________ Brenda Coblentz, Program Manager, Software Quality & Systems Engineering

359

DOE Site List  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Links Links Central Internet Database CID Photo Banner DOE Site List Site Geo Site Code State Operations Office1 DOE Programs Generating Streams at Site DOE Programs Managing Facilities Associated Data2 Acid/Pueblo Canyons ACPC NM Oak Ridge Waste/Media, Facilities Airport Substation CA Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Hill Communication Site CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Substation CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities AL Complex NM Albuquerque DP Facilities Alba Craft ALCL OH Oak Ridge Facilities Albany Research Center AMRC OR Oak Ridge Facilities Alcova Switchyard WY Western Area Power Administration Facilities Aliquippa Forge ALFO PA Oak Ridge Facilities

360

DOE Distribution Workshop Attendees  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 Laurie Actman Deputy Director EEB Hub Chris Ainscough Senior Engineer National renewable Energy Joe Allen Director of Government Relations Caterpillar / Solar Turbines Robert Anders Mr. U.S. Department of Energy - EERE David Anderson Technology Development Manager Department of Energy Sam Baldwin Chief Science Officer EERE/DOE Thomas Baldwin Conv Renewables Group Lead Idaho National Venkat Banunarayanan Grid Integration & Solar Forecasting Department of Energy - SunShot Vincent Battaglia Deputy Department Head ESDR LBNL Gil Bindewald General Engineer US DOE/Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Anjan Bose Grid Tech Team Lead DOE/Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Ralph Braccio

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

DOE Average Results  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE DOE Average Results FY 12 DOE Target FY 12 Customer Perspective: Customer Satisfaction: -Timeliness 92 88 -Quality 94 92 Effective Service Partnership: -Extent of Customer Satisfaction with the responsiveness, etc. 90 92 Internal Business Perspective: Acquisition Excellence: -Extent to which internal quality control systems are effective 90 88 Most Effective Use of Contracting Approaches to Maximize Efficiency and Cost Effectiveness: Use of Competition: -% of total $'s obligated on competitive acquisitions >$3000 (Agency Level Only) 94 85 -% of acquisition actions competed for actions > $3000 (Agency Level Only) 65 68 Performance Based Acquisition: - % PBA actions relative to total eligible new acquisition actions (applicable to new actions > $25K) 82

362

Radiological Protection for DOE Activities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes radiological protection program requirements that, combined with 10 CFR 835 and its associated implementation guidance, form the basis for a comprehensive program for protection of individuals from the hazards of ionizing radiation in controlled areas. Extended by DOE N 441.3. Cancels DOE 5480.11, DOE 5480.15, DOE N 5400.13, DOE N 5480.11; please note: the DOE radiological control manual (DOE/EH-0256T)

1995-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

363

DOE research on atmospheric aerosols  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Atmospheric aerosols are the subject of a significant component of research within DOE`s environmental research activities, mainly under two programs within the Department`s Environmental Sciences Division, the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program and the Atmospheric Chemistry Program (ACP). Research activities conducted under these programs include laboratory experiments, field measurements, and theoretical and modeling studies. The objectives and scope of these programs are briefly summarized. The ARM Program is the Department`s major research activity focusing on atmospheric processes pertinent to understanding global climate and developing the capability of predicting global climate change in response to energy related activities. The ARM approach consists mainly of testing and improving models using long-term measurements of atmospheric radiation and controlling variables at highly instrumented sites in north central Oklahoma, in the Tropical Western Pacific, and on the North Slope of Alaska. Atmospheric chemistry research within DOE addresses primarily the issue of atmospheric response to emissions from energy-generation sources. As such this program deals with the broad topic known commonly as the atmospheric source-receptor sequence. This sequence consists of all aspects of energy-related pollutants from the time they are emitted from their sources to the time they are redeposited at the Earth`s surface.

Schwartz, S.E.

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

364

Evaluation of Nondestructive Assay/Nondestructive Examination Capabilities for Department of Energy Spent Nuclear Fuel  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes an evaluation of the potential use of nondestructive assay (NDA) and nondestructive examination (NDE) technologies on DOE spent nuclear fuel (SNF). It presents the NDA/NDE information necessary for the National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program (NSNFP) and the SNF storage sites to use when defining that role, if any, of NDA/NDE in characterization and certification processes. Note that the potential role for NDA/NDE includes confirmatory testing on a sampling basis and is not restricted to use as a primary, item-specific, data collection method. The evaluation does not attempt to serve as a basis for selecting systems for development or deployment. Information was collected on 27 systems being developed at eight DOE locations. The systems considered are developed to some degree, but are not ready for deployment on the full range of DOE SNF and still require additional development. The system development may only involve demonstrating performance on additional SNF, packaging the system for deployment, and developing calibration standards, or it may be as extensive as performing additional basic research. Development time is considered to range from one to four years. We conclude that NDA/NDE systems are capable of playing a key role in the characterization and certification of DOE SNF, either as the primary data source or as a confirmatory test. NDA/NDE systems will be able to measure seven of the nine key SNF properties and to derive data for the two key properties not measured directly. The anticipated performance goals of these key properties are considered achievable except for enrichment measurements on fuels near 20% enrichment. NDA/NDE systems can likely be developed to measure the standard canisters now being considered for co-disposal of DOE SNF. This ability would allow the preparation of DOE SNF for storage now and the characterization and certification to be finalize later.

Luptak, A.J.; Bulmahn, K.D.

1998-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity (AVTA) - Vehicle Testing and...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

95% fleet cost split * 151 PHEVs in various testing stages, AVTA paid for 2 vehicles, 14 conversions and 60 data loggers. 15% DOE and 85% fleet cost split 7 FY08 PHEV Testing...

366

DOE Removes Brookhaven Contractor  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Removes DOE Removes Brookhaven Contractor Peña sends a message to DOE facilities nationwide INSIDE 2 Accelerator Rx 4 FermiKids 6 Spring at Fermilab Photos courtesy of Brookhaven National Laboratory by Judy Jackson, Office of Public Affairs Secretary of Energy Federico Peña announced on Thursday, May 1, that the Department of Energy would immediately terminate the current management contract with Associated Universities, Inc. at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York. Peña said that he made the decision after receiving the results of a laboratory safety management review conducted by the independent oversight arm of DOE's Office of Environment, Safety and Health. In addition, the Secretary said he found unacceptable "the continued on page 8 Volume 20 Friday, May 16, 1997

367

DOE/EA-1807  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE WIND ENERGY PROJECT NORMAL, MCLEAN COUNTY, ILLINOIS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office DECEMBER 2010 DOE/EA 1807 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE WIND ENERGY PROJECT NORMAL, MCLEAN COUNTY, ILLINOIS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office DECEMBER 2010 DOE/EA 1807 iii December 2010 C OV E R S HE E T R E SPONSI B L E A G E NC Y : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) T I T L E : Final Environmental Assessment for Heartland Community College Wind Energy Project, Normal, McLean County, Illinois (DOE/EA 1807). C ONT A C T : For additional copies or more information on this Environmental Assessment

368

DOE 2014 Biomass Conference  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Breakout Session 1CFostering Technology Adoption I: Building the Market for Renewables with High Octane Fuels DOE 2014 Biomass Conference Jim Williams, Senior Manager, American Petroleum Institute

369

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

www.inl.gov Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S....

370

DOE Reg. Burden RFI  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 4, 2012 January 4, 2012 Page 1 January 4, 2012 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. AHRI had submitted comments on March 21, 2011 in response to the previous Request for Information (RFI) issued by DOE in February of 2011. We appreciate DOE's commitment to maintaining a plan for regular, periodic review of its existing regulations and reporting

371

DOE Robotics Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provide the bimonthly progress reports on the Department of Energy (DOE) Robotics Project by the University of Michigan. Reports are provided for the time periods of December 90/January 91 through June 91/July 91. (FI)

Not Available

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

DOE Corporate FEOSH  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Employee Occupational Safety and Health (FEOSH) Program web site is the connection to current safety and health news and issues: Departmental special emphasis initiatives, upcoming activities, resources, contacts, and much, much more.

373

DOE Patents Database - News Archive  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

8 2009 2010 8 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 News Archive 2007 December 2007--Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography (EUVL) System and Method Extreme Ultraviolet Engineering Test Stand Caption: Drawing of the Extreme Ultraviolet Engineering Test Stand. The goal of the ETS is to demonstrate how ultraviolet wavelengths can be used to print patterns on integrated circuits at production levels and sizes. In order to keep faster, smaller, cheaper computer chips coming, three DOE laboratories worked together under a $250 million cooperative research and development agreement with a consortium of industrial partners to produce a next-generation technology for making computer chips. Researchers from Lawrence Livermore, Sandia Livermore and Lawrence Berkeley national laboratories developed a new technology that uses extreme

374

COMMERCIAL SNF ACCIDENT RELEASE FRACTIONS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this design analysis is to specify and document the total and respirable fractions for radioactive materials that are released from an accident event at the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) involving commercial spent nuclear fuel (CSNF) in a dry environment. The total and respirable release fractions will be used to support the preclosure licensing basis for the MGR. The total release fraction is defined as the fraction of total CSNF assembly inventory, typically expressed as an activity inventory (e.g., curies), of a given radionuclide that is released to the environment from a waste form. The radionuclides are released from the inside of breached fuel rods (or pins) and from the detachment of radioactive material (crud) from the outside surfaces of fuel rods and other components of fuel assemblies. The total release fraction accounts for several mechanisms that tend to retain, retard, or diminish the amount of radionuclides that are available for transport to dose receptors or otherwise can be shown to reduce exposure of receptors to radiological releases. The total release fraction includes a fraction of airborne material that is respirable and could result in inhalation doses. This subset of the total release fraction is referred to as the respirable release fraction. Potential accidents may involve waste forms that are characterized as either bare (unconfined) fuel assemblies or confined fuel assemblies. The confined CSNF assemblies at the MGR are contained in shipping casks, canisters, or disposal containers (waste packages). In contrast to the bare fuel assemblies, the container that confines the fuel assemblies has the potential of providing an additional barrier for diminishing the total release fraction should the fuel rod cladding breach during an accident. However, this analysis will not take credit for this additional bamer and will establish only the total release fractions for bare unconfined CSNF assemblies, which may however be conservatively applied to confined CSNF assemblies.

S.O. Bader

1999-10-18T23:59:59.000Z

375

Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations The Department of Energy (DOE) issues test procedures and regulations covering a number of products, but does provide for exceptions to these rules under certain circumstances. Any person, as defined by 10 CFR 1003.2, can apply to the DOE for an exception from a rule, regulation, or DOE action having the effect of a rule, as provided for in section 504 of 42 U.S.C. 7194 and codified in 10 CFR 1003 subpart B. The DOE Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) is responsible for issuing an order either granting or denying the application, in whole or in part, based upon a showing of serious hardship, gross inequity or unfair distribution of burdens, after considering the application and other

376

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA In May 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a policy in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for decommissioning surplus DOE facilities consistent with the requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This policy ensures protection of the environment, worker health and public health, provides opportunities for stakeholder involvement, and achieves risk reduction without unnecessary delay. Consistent with the jointly issued "Guidance on Accelerating CERCLA Environmental Restoration at Federal Facilities" (August 22, 1994), this decommissioning policy encourages streamlined decision-making. This

377

Political Activity at DOE Facilities and by DOE Contractors ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and by DOE Contractors The Policy Flash from October 5, 2011, serves to remind Contracting Officers of restrictions on political activity by DOE contractors at the Department...

378

DOE Challenge Home, Washington Program Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Challenge Home Washington Program Requirements 9-1-2013 To qualify as a DOE Challenge Home, a home shall meet the minimum requirements specified below, be verified and field-tested in accordance with HERS Standards by an approved verifier, and meet all applicable codes. Builders may meet the requirements of either the Performance Path or the Prescriptive path to qualify a home. 1 Single family detached and attached dwelling units, and dwelling units in multifamily buildings with 3 stories or fewer above-grade 2,3 are eligible for qualification. DOE Challenge Home Prescriptive Path The prescriptive path provides a single set of measures that can be used to construct a DOE Challenge Home labeled home. Modeling is not required, but no tradeoffs are allowed. Follow these steps to use the prescriptive path:

379

DOE History Timeline | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Timeline Timeline DOE History Timeline DOE History Timeline The Department of Energy is one of the most interesting and diverse agencies in the Federal Government. Activated on October 1, 1977, the twelfth cabinet-level department brought together for the first time within one agency two programmatic traditions that had long coexisted within the Federal establishment: 1) defense responsibilities that included the design, construction, and testing of nuclear weapons dating from the Manhattan Project effort to build the atomic bomb during World War II; and 2) a loosely knit amalgamation of energy-related programs scattered throughout the Federal Government. The intent of the DOE History Timeline is to provide the public with easy access to accurate information about the history of DOE and its predecessor

380

DOE Issues Noncompliance Notices | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Issues Noncompliance Notices DOE Issues Noncompliance Notices DOE Issues Noncompliance Notices November 1, 2011 - 12:23pm Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Haier America Trading, L.L.C., regarding Haier compact chest freezer model number HNCM070, which is manufactured in China. DOE tested four units of the freezer and determined that the units consumed energy at the rates of 363, 341, 352, and 387 kWh/yr, exceeding the federal limit by an average of 32 percent. The Office of Enforcement also issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Goodman Manufacturing regarding commercial package central air conditioner model CPC180XXX3BXXXAA. The federal energy conservation standard requires that commercial package central air conditioners operate

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

DOE Challenge Home, California Program Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Challenge Home California Program Requirements These Program Requirements shall only be used in the State of California. To qualify as a DOE Challenge Home, a home shall meet the minimum requirements specified below, be verified and field-tested in accordance with HERS Standards by an approved verifier, and meet all applicable codes. Builders may meet the requirements of either the Performance Path or the Prescriptive path to qualify a home. 1 Single family detached and attached dwelling units, and dwelling units in multifamily buildings with 3 stories or fewer above-grade 2,3 are eligible for qualification. DOE Challenge Home Prescriptive Path The prescriptive path provides a single set of measures that can be used to construct a DOE Challenge Home labeled

382

DOE-STD-3026-99 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-99 6-99 DOE-STD-3026-99 February 24, 2009 Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan Superseding DOE NE F 3-44 July 1986 This standard was developed primarily for application in U.S. Department of Energy programs. It contains specific direction for HEPA filter testing performed at a DOE-accepted HEPA Filter Test Facility (FTF). Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, deletions) and any pertinent data that may improve this document should be sent to the Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards (EH-31), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585, by letter or by using the self-addressed Document Improvement Proposal form (DOE F 1300.3) appearing at the end of this document. DOE-STD-3026-99: Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan More Documents & Publications

383

Testing for PV Reliability (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE SUNSHOT workshop is seeking input from the community about PV reliability and how the DOE might address gaps in understanding. This presentation describes the types of testing that are needed for PV reliability and introduces a discussion to identify gaps in our understanding of PV reliability testing.

Kurtz, S.; Bansal, S.

2014-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

DOE to Debut a Dynamic 5-Megawatt Dynamometer  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Boulder, Colorado -- As wind turbine capacity continues to grow, so does the need to test the electrical and mechanical power-producing components of those turbines. Currently, only a few test facilities worldwide have the capability to test wind turbine drivetrains with capacity ratings up to 5 megawatts--and DOE's National Wind Technology Center at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory is now one of them.

385

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DOE G 414.1-2B Admin Change 1, Quality Assurance Program Guide DOE O 221.1A, Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse to the Office of the Inspector General DOE O 232.2, Occurrence...

386

DOE Ex Parte Communication Memorandum  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On Thursday March 20th, energy efficiency experts held a teleconference call withtrepresentatives of the US Department of Energy (DOE) to discuss DOEs proposed determination for computer systems.

387

DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order institutes a DOE wide program for the management of operating experience to prevent adverse operating incidents and facilitate the sharing of good work practices among DOE sites. Cancels DOE O 210.2.

2011-04-08T23:59:59.000Z

388

Order Module--DOE O 460.1C, PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY, DOE O  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

O 460.1C, PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY, O 460.1C, PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY, DOE O 460.2A, DEPARTMENTAL MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION AND PACKAGING MANAGEMENT Order Module--DOE O 460.1C, PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY, DOE O 460.2A, DEPARTMENTAL MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION AND PACKAGING MANAGEMENT "The familiar level of this module is divided into two sections. The objectives and requirements of DOE O 460.1C and DOE O 460.2A will be discussed in the first and second sections, respectively. Several examples and practices throughout the module are provided to help familiarize you with the material. The practices will also help prepare you for the criterion test. Before continuing, you should obtain a copy of the Orders and implementation guides and manuals for this module. Copies of the Orders are available on the internet

389

DOE Vehicular Tank Workshop Sandia National Laboratories  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DOE Vehicular Tank Workshop Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, CA April 29, 2010 Thursday the deployment of hydrogen storage tanks in early market fuel cell applications for vehicles Workshop Objectives at the first workshop in more detail, including Type 4 tank and PRD testing, tank service life and tracking

390

DOE Vehicular Tank Workshop Sandia National Laboratories  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DOE Vehicular Tank Workshop Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, CA Nondestructive Evaluation for Ultrasonic Testing of Flat Panel Composites and Sandwich Core Materials Used in Aerospace Applications ­ E2581-07 Std Practice for Shearography of Polymer Matrix Composites, Sandwich Core Materials

391

links | netl.doe.gov  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Engines U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY INFORMATION SOURCES Department of Energy (DOE) Clean Coal Technology Compendium DOE Labs Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Network (EREN)...

392

DOE Exascale Initiative  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Exascale Initiative Dimitri Kusnezov, Senior Advisor to the Secretary, US DOE Steve Binkley, Senior Advisor, Office of Science, US DOE Bill Harrod, Office of Science/ASCR Bob Meisner, Defense Programs/ASC Briefing to the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, September 13, 2013 The Department of Energy is planning for a major computer and computational science initiative anchored in our mission challenges. We use the term 'exascale' to capture the successful transition to the next era of computing in the 2020 timeframe. Change is coming in many ways, not just technology. For instance: World we were in World we are going to Processing/ Processing expensive/ Processing free/ Memory: memory free memory expensive Ecosystem US micro-electronics Globalization of supply chain

393

DOE Roadmap: Chapter 2  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2. Narratives and Records Series Descriptions 2. Narratives and Records Series Descriptions Introduction This chapter contains two kinds of information. The first consists of brief narrative histories that discuss the involvement of the Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies with human radiation experiments. These histories cover agency headquarters elements and the various field sites that had significant involvement in experiment activities. The second category of information is series descriptions for groups of original records that are pertinent to either individual experiments or to the organizational context in which they took place. Since many of these records still reside at DOE sites, series descriptions are appended to the narrative for each facility. Where records are not in the custody of DOE, they are listed under their custodial organization (such as the National Archives).

394

DOE/EIS-0380  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 FISCAL YEAR 2011 MITIGATION ACTION PLAN ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE 2008 LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APRIL 2012 LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE 3747 West Jemez Road, MS A-316 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 DISCLAIMER: This document was prepared by Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS) in their role as management and operations (M&O) contractor for the Los Alamos National Laboratory, under contract to DOE/NNSA (Contract Number DE-AC52-06NA25396). DOE/NNSA LASO has reviewed this document for content and accuracy. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Officer for DOE/NNSA LASO concurs with this document. LA-UR-11-06159 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

395

DOE Hydrogen Program Overview  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Fuel Cells and Fuel Cells Mark Paster U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Program January, 2005 A Bold New Approach is Required 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Petroleum (MMB/Day Oil Equivalent) Actual Projection U.S. Oil Production EIA 2003 Base Case Extended Oil Consumption With Average Fuel Efficiency Automobile & Light Truck Oil Use U.S. Transportation Oil Consumption U.S. Refinery Capacity Source: DOE/EIA, International Petroleum Statistics Reports, April 1999; DOE/EIA 0520, International Energy Annual 1997, DOE/EIA0219(97), February 1999. 0 20 40 60 80 100 Rest of World OPEC US Percentage of Total Consumption Production Reserves 2% 12% 26% 7% 41% 77% 67% 47% 21% World Oil Reserves are Consolidating in OPEC Nations 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

396

DOE Retro Analysis Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Retro Analysis Plan Retro Analysis Plan August 2, 2011 Page 1 August 2, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the July 11, 2011 Federal Register requesting comments on the Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules. We are encouraged by DOE's efforts to implement Executive Order 13563. We appreciate the actions already taken by DOE to address our concerns regarding the Final Rule on Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Regulations for Consumer Products and Commercial and

397

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices. Please send updates to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov Oct 04, 2013 Forrestal (FORS) Addresses: Germantown (GTN) Addresses: 1000 Independence Ave SW 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585-1290 . Use for U.S. Postal Service mail. 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Use for EXPRESS DELIVERY (e.g. Federal Express, UPS). NAME, OFFICE, E-MAIL FAX ADDRESS PHONE william.bierbower@hq.doe.gov Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy 202-287-6585 FORS AR-1 20585 ARPA-E William Bierbower lori.gray@go.doe.gov Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office 720-356-1568 720-356-1350 Department of Energy

398

DOE F 284  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-284 DOE-284 (10-88) MANDATORY DATA COLLECTION AUTHORIZED BY Public Laws 83-703, 93-438 Previous editions are obsolete. OMB CONTROL NO. 1910-1800 Public Reporting Notice Disclosure on Back NUCLEAR MATERIAL TRANSFER REPORT NUCLEAR MATERIAL ON TRANSFER SHIPPING DATE MATERIAL HAS BEEN VERIFIED AS FOLLOWS (CHECH ONE): DATE RECEIVED FROM (RIS) PIECE COUNT OTHER: SHIPPER'S WEIGHTS AND NUCLEAR MATERIAL CONTENTS ARE ACCEPTED PENDING FINAL VERIFICATION MEASUREMENTS AND COMPLETION OF DOE/NRC FORM 741 CONTAINER COUNT BY (ACCOUNTABILITY REPRESENTATIVE) (See instructions for provisions regarding confidentiality.) GROSS WEIGHT CHECK TO (RIS) NO. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 18. U.S.C., SECTION 1001, ACT OF JUNE 25, 1948; 62 STAT. 749, MAKES IT A CRIMINAL OFFENSE TO MAKE A WILLFULLY FALSE STATEMENT OR REPRESENTATION TO ANY DEPARTMENT

399

DOE | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

DOE DOE Dataset Summary Description Source EERE Date Released September 27th, 2010 (4 years ago) Date Updated September 27th, 2010 (4 years ago) Keywords buildings commercial buildings DOE energy use Data application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon New construction (xlsx, 277.8 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon Post-1980 construction (in or after 1980) (xlsx, 277.9 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon Pre-1980 construction (xlsx, 253 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Time Period License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) Comment Rate this dataset Usefulness of the metadata

400

GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- - a,- p^A CU ^ ^JL\ CC6p^ w b A GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS Office of Management, November 2008 The DOE Headquarters Forrestal and Germantown buildings have award-winning energy conservation and environmental quality programs focused on making our buildings as green as possible and, enabling them to serve as showcases for the entire Department. Both the Forrestal and the Germantown facilities have earned EPA's Energy Star designation, ranking them among the nation's top buildings in terms of energy performance. Of all the buildings in the U.S. only approximately 4000 have earned this distinction. In addition, the Forrestal Building is one of only two Federal Energy Star Buildings in Washington DC. DOE Headquarters achieved these designations after years of effort by the facility managers and staffs to incorporate energy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Directives DOE Directives DOE Directives Directives are the Department of Energy's primary means to communicate and institutionalize directives and policies and to establish requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental elements and contractors. DOE O 413.3A - Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets DOE G 413.3-1 - Managing Design and Construction Using Systems Engineering for Use with DOE O 413.3A DOE G 413.3-2 - Quality Assurance Guide for Project Management DOE G 413.3-3 - Safeguards and Security for Program and Project Management DOE G 413.3-8 - Environmental Management (EM) Cleanup Projects DOE G 413.3-9 - U.S. Department of Energy Project Review Guide for Capital Asset Projects DOE G 413.3-10 - Earned Value Management System (EVMS)

402

DOE Home Offices & Facilities About DOE Press Room q Highlights  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SEARCH DOE Home Offices & Facilities About DOE Press Room q Highlights q Press Releases q DOE strategies and biotechnologies for cleaning up groundwater at DOE and at industry sites." The contamination've provided a comprehensive picture that has led to fundamental changes in how scientists evaluate

Lovley, Derek

403

DOE Refers Two ENERGY STAR Models to EPA for Potential De-Listing |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Refers Two ENERGY STAR Models to EPA for Potential De-Listing DOE Refers Two ENERGY STAR Models to EPA for Potential De-Listing DOE Refers Two ENERGY STAR Models to EPA for Potential De-Listing January 11, 2012 - 11:00am Addthis U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") testing has identified one refrigerator-freezer that does not meet the ENERGY STAR program's energy efficiency requirement and one dishwasher that may not meet an ENERGY STAR requirement. Dayton-brand refrigerator-freezer model 5NTX1, imported by Grainger Global Sourcing ("Grainger"), and ASKO Appliances, Inc. ("ASKO") dishwasher model D5253XXL were selected for testing as part of the DOE ENERGY STAR Verification Testing Program. DOE testing revealed that Grainger's Dayton-brand model 5NTX1 does not meet the ENERGY STAR energy efficiency requirement. The four tested units

404

test1 - Datasets - OpenEI Datasets  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

test1 This is only a test Data and Resources TEST1.1com TESTING More info Go to resource doe test1 test2 test Additional Info Field Value Catalog OpenEI Origination Date 2014-11-12...

405

Between DOE/NNSA Sandia Site Office And DOE/NNSA Pantex Site Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Agreement Agreement Between DOE/NNSA Sandia Site Office And DOE/NNSA Pantex Site Office Weapons Evaluation Test Laboratory Approved by: '1--lS'-0't R~\JJ~ Date !f1~ Dae PSXO/SSO WETL MOA September 2009 Memorandum of Agreement for Weapons Evaluation Test Laboratory This Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is entered into by the Pantex Site Office (PXSO) and the Sandia Site Office (SSO) for operation of the Weapons Evaluation Test Laboratory (WETL) at the Pantex Site. The MOA references operations, support, and requirements to be met by the Pantex Managing and Operating (M&O) Contractor and the Sandia Corporation (Sandia) pursuant to their respective prime contracts with Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA). Purpose The purpose of this document is to set forth the roles, responsibilities, authorities and accountabilities with

406

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

822 822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 DOE/EA-1822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... iii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ vii

407

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

76 76 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 DOE/EA-1776 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... v 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................................................. 2

408

DOE/CF-0073  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 DOE/CF-0073 Volume 3 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas

409

DOE Cybersecurity Awareness Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The OCIO supports a variety of cybersecurity awareness activities that impress upon DOE employees the importance of cybersecurity and the adverse consequences of its failure. The primary purpose of awareness activities is to enhance the 'general awareness and understanding' of current cyber threats and recommended mitigations as well as to cultivate a computing environment where cybersecurity behaviors and responses are automatic and consistent.

410

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 DOE/EA-1776 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ iii

411

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22 22 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 DOE/EA-1822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... iii

412

DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order establishes a DOE wide program for management of operating experience to prevent adverse operating incidents and to expand the sharing of good work practices among DOE sites. Canceled by DOE O 210.2A. Does not cancel other directives.

2006-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

413

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Geothermal  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Geothermal Test Facility, California Geothermal Test Facility, California This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Request a paper copy of any document by submitting a Document Request. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Other Documents Fact Sheet Geothermal Test Facility, California, Site Fact Sheet December 12, 2011 Other Documents Geothermal Test Facility (GTF) Closure and Records Transfer (DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration memorandum) April 23, 2004 Closure Report East Mesa Geothermal Test Facility July 31, 1998 Recission of Waste Discharge Requirements for U.S. Department of Energy, Geothermal Test Facility, East Mesa - El Centro, Imperial County (California Regional Water Quality Control Board letter) January 4, 1997

414

DOE | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

DOE DOE Home DOE Wind Vision Community Description: The DOE Wind Program, in close cooperation with the wind industry, is launching a new initiative to revisit the findings of the 2008 DOE 20% The DOE Wind Program, in close cooperation with the wind industry, is launching a new initiative to revisit the findings of the 2008 DOE 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report, and to develop a renewed vision for U.S. wind power research, development, and deployment. Included in this effort will be: community DOE forum Wind Graham7781's picture Submitted by Graham7781(1992) Super contributor 26 April, 2013 - 11:05 OpenEI Showcased in Geothermal Exploration Best Practices Workshop DOE geothermal GTO OpenEI This week, Denver hosted the US DOE Geothermal Technologies Office (GTO) 2013 Peer Review. The purpose of the peer review is to offer geothermal

415

DOE Science Showcase - Understanding Protein Membranes | OSTI...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE R&D Project Summaries DOE Data Explorer Drug Research Documents from DOE Databases...

416

GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS More Documents & Publications Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to...

417

2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan 2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan In the 2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan, DOE pledges to...

418

DOE Science Showcase - Neutron Science Research from DOE Databases | OSTI,  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Science Showcase - Neutron Science Research from DOE Databases DOE Science Showcase - Neutron Science Research from DOE Databases Additional neutron science research in DOE Databases Information Bridge Neutron scattering research was pioneered in 1946 by ORNL's Clifford G. Shull, winner of 1994 Nobel Prize in Physics. Access Shull's early research records in Energy Citations Database. Neutron scattering research was pioneered in 1946 by ORNL's Clifford G. Shull, winner of 1994 Nobel Prize in Physics. Access Shull's early research records in Energy Citations Database. Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments DOE R&D Project Summaries DOE Data Explorer DOepatents Researchers at DOE labs, including Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), and Oak Ridge National Laboratory

419

DOE enforcement program roles and responsibilities: DOE handbook  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Price-Anderson Act provides indemnification to DOE contractors who manage and conduct nuclear activities in the DOE complex. The government acts as an insurer for these contractors against any findings of liability from the nuclear activities of the contractor within the scope of its contract. 10 CFR Part 820 establishes the legal framework for implementing DOE`s Nuclear Safety Enforcement Program. Integration with other DOE organizations and programs would assure that the enforcement process properly considers the actual or potential safety significance of a violation when determining an appropriate enforcement sanction. Achieving a proactive contractor compliance assurance rather than a heavy enforcement hand, will require a foundation of cooperation and teamwork across DOE organizations. This handbook identifies the areas of interface for the DOE Enforcement Program and provides guidance on roles and responsibilities for the key DOE organizational areas. It complements DOE-HDBK-1087-95 and 1089-95.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

DOE Technical Standards Program: Online Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Online Approved DOE Technical Standards Online Approved DOE Technical Standards No. 1001 – 2000 No. 3001 – 4000 No. 4001 – 5500 No. 5501 – 6000 No. 6001 – 6500 No. 7501 – 7750 Document Number Range 1001 – 2000 Number Title DOE-HDBK-1001-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Instructors (80 pages) PDF (226 KB) DOE-HDBK-1002-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators (70 pages) PDF (311 KB) DOE-HDBK-1003-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Maintenance Personnel (106 pages) PDF (391 KB) DOE-HDBK-1010-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Classical Physics (142 pages) PDF (1120 KB) DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Electrical Science, Volume 1 of 4 (166 pages) PDF (4255 KB)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

DOE/EA-1673: Environmental Assessment for Energy Conservation Program for Certain Industrial Equipment: Energy Conservation Standards and Test Procedures for Commercial Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Water-Heating Equipment (July 2009)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 Environmental Assessment for 10 CFR 431 Energy Conservation Program for Certain Industrial Equipment: Energy Conservation Standards and Test Procedures for Commercial Heating, Air- Conditioning, and Water-Heating Equipment July 2009 8-i CHAPTER 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 8.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 8-1 8.3 AIR POLLUTANT DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................................ 8-1 8.4 AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS ...................................................................................... 8-3

422

AHAM Letter Acknowledging DOE Letter on Verification Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is a response to the letter dated April 26, 2013, in which DOE adopted a new policy regarding DOE ENERGY STAR verification testing of models that are part of the AHAM verification program for clothes washers, dishwashers, and residential refrigerator/freezers.

423

DOE Issues Final RFP for Hanford Site Lab Services  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Cincinnati -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued the final Request for Proposal (RFP), 100 percent set-aside for small businesses, for the operation and performance of analytical and testing services at the DOE Hanford 222-S Lab. A Draft RFP was previously released on February 28, 2014, requesting comments from industry.

424

DOE Federal Register Questions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COMMENTS-PAGE 1 COMMENTS-PAGE 1 Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration On May 11, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Request for Information (RFI) (NBP RFI: Communications Requirements) seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in understanding the communications requirement of utilities, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the Smart Grid. The RFI also seeks to collect information about electricity infrastructure's current and projected communications requirements, as well as the types of networks and communications services that may be used for grid modernization, including specifically information on what types of communications capabilities utilities think that they will need and what type of communications capabilities the communications carriers think that they can

425

DOE/SEA-04  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM 10 ). As a result of the study, on August 19, 2005, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) issued a letter to Mirant requesting that Mirant "undertake such action as is necessary to ensure protection of human health and the environment, in the area surrounding the Potomac River Generating Station, including the potential reduction of levels of operation, or potential shutdown of the facility." On August 24, 2005, in response to VDEQ's August 19, 2005, letter, Mirant decided to shut down all five generating units at the Plant. Figure S-1. The location of the Plant in relation to the central Washington, D.C. area. DOE/SEA-04 November 2006 S-3 DOE Action On August 24, 2005, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) filed an

426

DOE/SEA-04  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

μm in aerodynamic μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM 10 ). As a result of the study, on August 19, 2005, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) issued a letter to Mirant requesting that Mirant "undertake such action as is necessary to ensure protection of human health and the environment, in the area surrounding the Potomac River Generating Station, including the potential reduction of levels of operation, or potential shutdown of the facility." On August 24, 2005, in response to VDEQ's August 19, 2005, letter, Mirant decided to shut down all five generating units at the Plant. Figure S-1. The location of the Plant in relation to the central Washington, D.C. area. DOE/SEA-04 November 2006 S-3 DOE Action On August 24, 2005, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) filed an

427

BPA / Doe Memo Template  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-90) Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-90) David Byrnes TO: Fish and Wildlife Project Manager, KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Naches River Water Treatment Plant Intake Screening Project Project No: 2002-052-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 4.23 Intake and Return Diversion Screens, 9.23 Construction: Erosion and Sediment Control Structures. Location: Yakima, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the City of Yakima Description of the Proposed Action: BPA is proposing to fund the upgrade of the intake structure for the City of Yakima's Water Treatment Plant. The existing traveling water screen at

428

DOE Data Explorer  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DDE DDE Discovering data and non-text information in the Department of Energy DOE Data Explorer What's New About DDE DOE Data Centers OSTI's Data ID Service Featured Collection Featured Data Collection Visit CEDR View the archive Search Find Advanced Search Options × Full Text: Bibliographic Data: Creator/Author: Title: Subject: Identifier Numbers: Host Website: Research Org: Sponsor/Funding Org: Contributing Orgs: Type: Select Type Publication Date: from Date: to to Date: Sort: By Relevance By Title Limit to: Matches with DOI only Collections only (no DOIs) Clear Find Advanced Search Basic Search Browse DDE Content All Titles (alphabetically) Sponsor/Funding Organizations Types of Data and Non-text Other Related Organizations Subject Categories Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their

429

DOE Reg. Burden RFI  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 21, 2011 March 21, 2011 Page 1 March 21, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the Federal Register on February 3, 2011 requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. AHRI is the trade association representing manufacturers of heating, cooling, water heating, and commercial refrigeration equipment. More than 300 members strong, AHRI is an internationally recognized advocate for the industry, and develops standards for and certifies the performance of

430

DOE CONTRACTOR PENSION PLANS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-13 1-13 For use in M&O and non-M&O cost reimbursement solicitations and contracts where work had been previously performed under a DOE M&O contract and the successor Contractor is (a) required to employ all or part of the former Contractor's workforce and sponsors the employee pension and benefit plans; or (b) retains sponsorship of benefit plans that survive performance of the contract work scope. Contracts in this latter category include, but are not limited to, environmental remediation, infrastructure services and other site-specific project completion contracts. DOE-H-1002 EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION: PAY AND BENEFITS (a) Contractor Employee Compensation Plan The Contractor shall submit, for Contracting Officer approval, by (fill-in

431

DOE's Offices of Environmental  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Statement of Intent (SOI) Statement of Intent (SOI) between the US Dept of Energy (DOE) and the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) on decommissioning and waste management was renewed for a further five years during the Waste Management conference in Phoenix, AZ in March. The signatories to the SOI were the DOE's Offices of Environmental Management (EM) and Nuclear Energy (NE) and the NDA, with NE being a new addition to the arrangement. The Office of Environment Management is responsible for the clean-up of the former nuclear weapons' sites and the relationship between them and the NDA has already resulted in collaboration in a number of areas such as thermal treatments for stabilization of wastes, plutonium management, aging facilities management, non-standard fuels

432

DOE Patents Database - Innovations  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Innovations DOE Innovations Breakthroughs and Award Winners from the last 2 decades... Capillary Electrophoresis Ames Laboratory This technology allows multiple samples of substances to be analyzed simultaneously, providing both speed and accuracy. Has won multiple R&D 100 awards for inventor Ed Yeung and has been licensed by Spectromedix. U.S. Patent Nos. 5,324,401 and 5,582,705. Ultrananocrystalline Diamond (UNCD) Argonne National Laboratory Greatly surpasses other diamond film technologies with commercial potential, and can be used in a broad and diverse range of applications from macro to nanodevices, 2006 FLC Award Winner. U.S. Patent Nos. 5,620,512 and others. T7 Gene Expression System Brookhaven National Laboratory This patent family has been licensed to over 700 commercial entities

433

DOE/EIS-0284  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2007 A-1 2007 A-1 APPENDIX A. OTHER RELATED GHG PROGRAMS AND INITIATIVES The Program is only one program aimed at reducing GHG emissions. There are a number of actions by international entities, presidential initiatives, DOE, other federal agencies, state jurisdictions, and NGOs that, in some way, complement the intent of the Program. The following list of GHG reduction programs is provided for information purposes (and is not necessarily inclusive of all GHG programs and initiatives). A.1 INTERNATIONAL TREATIES, PROGRAMS, AND POLICIES The Rio Climate Treaty was signed in June 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil by more than 150 nations including the U.S. It has been ratified by many nations and seeks to stabilize the concentration of GHG concentrations; however, it does not set binding emissions limitations. Nations are urged to adopt their

434

DOE STGWG Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

STGWG Group STGWG Group The State and Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) is one of the intergovernmental organizations with which the DOE EM office works with. They meet twice yearly for updates to the EM projects. They were formed in 1989. It is comprised of several state legislators and tribal staff and leadership from states in proximity to DOE's environmental cleanup sites of the following states: New York, South Carolina, Ohio, Washington, New Mexico, Idaho, California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, Nevada, Oregon, Tennessee and Texas. The tribal membership is composed of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, the Isleta Pueblo, Jemez Pueblo, Navajo Nation, Nez Perce Tribe, Santa Clara Pueblo, Pueblo de San Ildefonso, Seneca Nation of Indians, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the

435

DOE-MIRMISBWG  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FEE-13-1998 14:45 FEE-13-1998 14:45 . . - . DOE-MIRMISBWG 7 2 . r i-.1 I-' ? * \,, ? / :' , 2' .' 513 I365 4489 P. 02/11 .1??y 7 -- RADIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY OF FO,RMER MONSANTO FACILITIES (Unit III and Warehouse) DAYTON, OHIO Report Date: 4 September 1997 Survey Date: 27 Ahgust 1997 Prepared by: Mark L, Mays, Chief Radiation Safety Branch Sponsored by: Miamisburg Environmental Management Project Office Ohio Field Office U.S. Department of Energy Conducted by: Radiation Safety Branch Offke of Environmental Management ggth Air Base Wing U.S. Department of the Air Force In Cooperation With: Southwest District Office Ohio Environmental Protection Agency UaEKi Ohio Environmedal Protection Agency Bureau of Radiological Health Ohio Department of Health FEB-13-1998 14:46 DOE-MIFIMISBURG 513 865 4489 P.03111

436

Order Module--DOE-HDBK-1203-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

STAFF AND MANAGERS, DOE-HDBK-1204-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEST ITEMS,DOE-HDBK-1205-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT Order...

437

DOE-Funded Research Projects Win 46 R&D 100 Awards for 2009 ...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

and engineers from 12 of the 17 DOE National Laboratories as well as the Nevada Test Site received awards. Since 1962, when R&D Magazine's annual competition began, DOE has...

438

DOE F 5634  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 (09/2012) Replaces DOE F470.8 (05-05) All Other Editions are Obsolete U.S. Department of Energy SURVEY/INSPECTION REPORT FORM 1. Type: Survey: Initial Periodic Special Termination OA Reviews: NPR EPR Self-Assessment 2. Report #: 3. Facility Name: 4. a. Facility Code: b. RIS Code: 5. Survey Date(s): 6. a. Findings: Yes No b. Findings Against Other Facilities:

439

DOE/CF-0088  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Volume 5 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-0088 Volume 5 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Volume 5 Table of Contents Section Appropriation Account Summary .......................................................................................................................................... AP Appropriation Language .................................................................................................................................................... EM-1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................ EM-3

440

1979 DOE statistical symposium  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 1979 DOE Statistical Symposium was the fifth in the series of annual symposia designed to bring together statisticians and other interested parties who are actively engaged in helping to solve the nation's energy problems. The program included presentations of technical papers centered around exploration and disposal of nuclear fuel, general energy-related topics, and health-related issues, and workshops on model evaluation, risk analysis, analysis of large data sets, and resource estimation.

Gardiner, D.A.; Truett T. (comps. and eds.)

1980-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

About DOE Green Energy  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

About DOE Green Energy Search DOE Green Energy to find publicly available bibliographic citations, technical reports and patent information on different types of renewable energy resources and energy conservation, such as solar, wind, bioenergy, hydroelectric and geothermal. For example, R&D on different types of vehicle technology, as well as studies regarding electricity and other power sources, are available. Subject areas include but are not limited to hydrogen, solar energy, tidal and wave power, energy storage, and direct energy conversion. When you search the Green Energy portal, your keyword query will be mapped to scientific concepts. This semantic technique, called "keyword to concept" mapping, is applied to your search behind the scenes and helps hone your search for more efficient knowledge access and discovery. This means that you will receive results that allow you to explore more narrow concepts, related concepts, or even broader concepts. DOE Green Energy affords you the use of the familiar and simple search box - yet still provides the benefits of an advanced search technology to help get at the information you need.

442

DOE F 740-MX  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Form 740M Form 740M (10-88) MANDATORY DATA COLLECTION AUTHORIZED BY 10 CFR 30, 40, 50, 70, 75, 150, Public Laws 83-703, 93-438, 95-91 OMB Control No. 1910-1800 4. REPORTING PERIOD 3. RIS 2. ATTACHMENT TO a. DOE/NRC 741 a. SHIPPER'S RIS b. RECEIVER'S RIS c. TRANS. NO. d. CORR NO. e. PC f. AC g. DATA CODE b. DOE/NRC 742 c. DOE/NRC 742c 5. TRANSACTION DATA 1. NAME 8a. LINE NO. 9. SIGNATURE (See instructions for provisions regarding confidentiality.) To the best of my knowledge and belief, the information given above and in any attached schedules is true, complete, and correct. 10. TITLE 11. DATE b. ENTRY REFERENCE c. TEXT OF CONCISE NOTE STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE FROM 6. REPORTING DATE 7. LICENSE NUMBERS TO Public Reporting Notice Disclosure on Back U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

443

DOE-HTGR-88111  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HTGR-88111 HTGR-88111 Revision 0 AUG 0 5 1991 . _ I . .....~ .. . . . . . - . . . . . . GRAPHITE DESIGN HANDBOOK AUTHORSICONTRACTORS GENERAL ATOMICS BUnON OF THIS DOCUMENT I S UNLlMmD ISSUED BY GENERAL ATOMICS FOR THE DEPARTMEW OF ENERGY CONTRACT DE-AC03-88SF17367 SEPTEMBER 1988 D 0 E- H TG R- 8 8 1 1 1 Revision 0 9 0 9 5 9 7 / 0 p b 7 ~ rJ T shall be made of c ~ c A R G D DOE Patent Coun 7 - 4 - S ( GRAPHITE DESIGN HANDBOOK DtSPRIBUflON OF THIS DOCUMENP I S UNLlMm Thle daoument is Issued By General Atomics P.O. Box 85608 San Diego, California 92138-5608 DOE CONTRACT DE-AC03-88SF17367 GA Project 6 3 0 0 SEPTEMBER 1988 RoU 2\66 GA 1 4 8 5 (REV 4/88) GENERAL ATOMICS IISCIPLINE SYSTEM 0 11 ISSUE SUMMARY DOC. TYPE PROJECT ISSUE NO./LTR. MAN 6300 DOE-HTGR-88111 0 l U A L l T Y ASSURANCE LEVEL N /A

444

DOE Energy Challenge Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Project Objectives: 1. Promote energy efficiency concepts in undergraduate and graduate education. 2. Stimulate and interest in pulp and paper industrial processes, which promote and encourage activities in the area of manufacturing design efficiency. 3. Attract both industrial and media attention. Background and executive Summary: In 1997, the Institute of Paper Science and Technology in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy developed a university design competition with an orientation to the Forest Products Industry. This university design competition is in direct alignment with DOEs interests in instilling in undergraduate education the concepts of developing energy efficient processes, minimizing waste, and providing environmental benefits and in maintaining and enhancing the economic competitiveness of the U.S. forest products industry in a global environment. The primary focus of the competition is projects, which are aligned with the existing DOE Agenda 2020 program for the industry and the lines of research being established with the colleges comprising the Pulp and Paper Education and Research Alliance (PPERA). The six design competitions were held annually for the period 1999 through 2004.

Frank Murray; Michael Schaepe

2009-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

445

DOE Roadmap: Chapter 3  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3. Human Radiation Experiments Associated With DOE and Its Predecessors 3. Human Radiation Experiments Associated With DOE and Its Predecessors Introduction This section contains a listing, description, and selected references for documented human radiation experiments sponsored, supported, or performed by the Department of Energy or its predecessors. The list represents work completed by the Office of Human Radiation Experiments through December 1994, and is a work in progress. Additional experiments will be added as they are identified, documented, and confirmed. The experiment list is available on the Internet and will be updated over time. This list includes experiments released at Secretary O'Leary's June 1994 press conference, as well as additional studies identified during the six months that followed. Cross-references are provided for experiments originally released at the press conference. Some of the 48 experiments released in June 1994 are not listed here, as continuing research is necessary. In the interest of assembling the most comprehensive information possible, a list of experiments described in the 1986 congressional report entitled American Nuclear Guinea Pigs: Three Decades of Radiation Experiments on U.S. Citizens is provided as an appendix. It should be noted that information about some studies in American Nuclear Guinea Pigs has been updated and included in the current DOE list; further update efforts are ongoing.

446

DOE Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Amend the External Power...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Proposed Rulemaking to Amend the External Power Supply Test Procedure; Docket No. EERE-2014-BT-TP-0043 RIN 1904-AD36 DOE Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Amend the External Power...

447

DOE F 470.7 | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Screening results are to be afixed to the form. Human Reliability Program (HRP) Alcohol Testing Form More Documents & Publications Inspection Letter Report: INS-L-11-01 DOE F 470.4...

448

Award-Winning DOE Technology Scores Success in Carbon Storage...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

-- has been successfully demonstrated at a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) New Mexico test site. The SEQURE(TM) tracer technology, developed by scientists at the Office of Fossil...

449

DOE in Final Months of NPR-3, RMOTC Sale  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE is in the final months of activities related to selling resources, equipment and facilities at the governments only operating oilfield, Naval Petroleum Reserve-3, including the Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center.

450

DOE Leverages Fossil Energy Expertise to Develop And Explore...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

its effectiveness, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced plans to leverage oil and gas expertise to test the reliability and efficiency of geothermal power generation...

451

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Plasticity after Bend Testing: A Feasibility Study Isabella J. van Rooyen March 2013 DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency...

452

Building Energy Software Tools Directory: DOE-2  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE-2 DOE-2 Hourly, whole-building energy analysis program calculating energy performance and life-cycle cost of operation. Can be used to analyze energy efficiency of given designs or efficiency of new technologies. Other uses include utility demand-side management and rebate programs, development and implementation of energy efficiency standards and compliance certification, and training new corps of energy-efficiency conscious building professionals in architecture and engineering schools. Keywords energy performance, design, retrofit, research, residential and commercial buildings Validation/Testing N/A Expertise Required Recommend 3 days of formal training in basic and advanced DOE-2 use. Users 800 user organizations in U.S., 200 user organizations internationally;

453

Sweet lake geopressured-geothermal project, Magma Gulf-Technadril/DOE Amoco Fee. Annual report, December 1, 1979-February 27, 1981. Volume I. Drilling and completion test well and disposal well  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Sweet lake site is located approximately 15 miles southeast of Lake Charles in Cameron Parish, Louisiana. A geological study showed that the major structure in this area is a graben. The dip of the beds is northwesterly into the basin. A well drilled into the deep basin would find the target sand below 18,000', at high pressures and temperatures. However, since there is no well control in the basin, the specific site was chosen on the 15,000' contour of the target sand in the eastern, more narrow part of the garben. Those key control wells are present within one mile of the test well. The information acquired by drilling the test well confirmed the earlier geologic study. The target sand was reached at 15,065', had a porosity of over 20% and a permeability to water of 300 md. The original reservoir pressure was 12,060 psi and the bottom hole temperature 299{sup 0}F. There are approximately 250 net feet of sand available for the perforation. The disposal well was drilled to a total depth of 7440'.

Rodgers, R.W. (ed.)

1982-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18, 2013 - 5:11pm Addthis WASHINGON, D. C. - After conducting a rigorous competitive selection process, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations, LLC (team includes members comprised of Parent Company Fluor Federal Services, Inc., of Arlington, Virginia and major subcontractors MRIGlobal of Kansas City, Missouri; Booz Allen Hamilton of Mclean, Virginia; and ASRC Petroleum Operations and Maintenance of Anchorage, Alaska) has been awarded a management and operating contract valued at $1.46 billion to run DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR)

455

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-10  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TECHNICAL STANDARDS TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM PROCEDURES DOE-TSPP-10 Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS TO NON-GOVERNMENT STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-10 Conversion Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1

456

DOE Sustainability SPOtlight: Special Edition 2013 DOE Sustainability Awards  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Newsletter highlights the recipients of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Sustainability Performance Office (SPO) 2013 Sustainability Awards.

457

Deployment evaluation methodology for the electrometallurgical treatment of DOE-EM spent nuclear fuel  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Part of the Department of Energy (DOE) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) inventory may require some type of treatment to meet acceptance criteria at various disposition sites. The current focus for much of this spent nuclear fuel is the electrometallurgical treatment process under development at Argonne National Laboratory. Potential flowsheets for this treatment process are presented. Deployment of the process for the treatment of the spent nuclear fuel requires evaluation to determine the spent nuclear fuel program need for treatment and compatibility of the spent nuclear fuel with the process. The evaluation of need includes considerations of cost, technical feasibility, process material disposition, and schedule to treat a proposed fuel. A siting evaluation methodology has been developed to account for these variables. A work breakdown structure is proposed to gather life-cycle cost information to allow evaluation of alternative siting strategies on a similar basis. The evaluation methodology, while created specifically for the electrometallurgical evaluation, has been written such that it could be applied to any potential treatment process that is a disposition option for spent nuclear fuel. Future work to complete the evaluation of the process for electrometallurgical treatment is discussed.

Dahl, C.A.; Adams, J.P.; Ramer, R.J.

1998-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

DOE-TSPP-06; Coordination of DOE Technical Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Date: July 2004 COORDINATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-6 Coordination Revision: 6 Date: July 2004 DOE Technical Standards Program 2 CONTENTS 1. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Applicability ................................................................................................................. 3 2. DOCUMENT COORDINATION......................................................................................................3

459

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-6  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Date: July 1, 2009 COORDINATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 Coordination DOE-TSPP-6 Revision: 7 DOE Technical Standards Program Date: July 1, 2009 1 CONTENTS 1. SCOPE....................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Applicability .................................................................................................................1 2. DOCUMENT COORDINATION...............................................................................................1

460

DOE O 420 Briefing Slides  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Order (O) 420.1C Order (O) 420.1C Facility Safety Changes to DOE O 420 1C and Changes to DOE O 420.1C and Expectations for Effective Implementation Pranab Guha, HS-31 Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design February y 2013 1 Objectives Objectives  Obtain feedback and/or address issues or concerns concerns  Understand the history of DOE O 420.1  Understand the drivers for changes in DOE O Understand the drivers for changes in DOE O 420.1C  Understand the major differences between Understand the major differences between DOE O 420.1B and DOE O 420.1C  Understand DOE exp pectation for effective implementation 2 History of DOE Order 420 1 History of DOE Order 420.1  DOE Order 420.1 issued in October 1995 and combined the following DOE Orders:  DOE Order 6430.1A, General Design Criteria

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

DOE Matching Grant Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Funding used to support a portion of the Nuclear Engineering Educational Activities. Upgrade of teaching labs, student support to attend professional conferences, salary support for graduate students. The US Department of Energy (DOE) has funded Purdue University School of Nuclear Engineering during the period of five academic years covered in this report starting in the academic year 1996-97 and ending in the academic year 2000-2001. The total amount of funding for the grant received from DOE is $416K. In the 1990's, Nuclear Engineering Education in the US experienced a significant slow down. Student enrollment, research support, number of degrees at all levels (BS, MS, and PhD), number of accredited programs, University Research and Training Reactors, all went through a decline to alarmingly low levels. Several departments closed down, while some were amalgamated with other academic units (Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, etc). The School of Nuclear Engineering at Purdue University faced a major challenge when in the mid 90's our total undergraduate enrollment for the Sophomore, Junior and Senior Years dropped in the low 30's. The DOE Matching Grant program greatly strengthened Purdue's commitment to the Nuclear Engineering discipline and has helped to dramatically improve our undergraduate and graduate enrollment, attract new faculty and raise the School of Nuclear Engineering status within the University and in the National scene (our undergraduate enrollment has actually tripled and stands at an all time high of over 90 students; total enrollment currently exceeds 110 students). In this final technical report we outline and summarize how the grant was expended at Purdue University.

Tsoukalas, L.

2002-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

462

DOE/CF-0089  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Volume 6 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 DOE/CF-0089 Volume 6 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration

463

space booklet_DOE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

U U C L E A R E N E R G Y DOE/NE-0071 U . S . D e p a r t m e n t o f E n e r g y O f f i c e o f N u c l e a r E n e r g y , S c i e n c e a n d T e c h n o l o g y N UCLEAR Power in Space 2

464

DOE/EIS-0284  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

B. CARBON SEQUESTRATION PROJECTS, INITIATIVES B. CARBON SEQUESTRATION PROJECTS, INITIATIVES AND TECHNOLOGIES This appendix provides details about existing and ongoing carbon sequestration research projects, initiatives and technologies. Although some of the projects and initiatives described here are being sponsored by DOE, the majority are sponsored by other government agencies, the private sector, or foreign governments. These descriptions are provided for both: * technologies that are in the very earliest stages of research, where deployment at the demonstration or commercial scale would not occur before 2012, and * existing and ongoing projects in the U.S and other countries, where the descriptions help exemplify the types and scales of research being conducted around the world.

465

DOE/CF-0084  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Volume 1 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-0084 Volume 1 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors

466

DOE/EA-  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EA-1605 EA-1605 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR BIOMASS COGENERATION AND HEATING FACILITIES AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE AUGUST 2008 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE DOE/EA-1605 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR BIOMASS COGENERATION AND HEATING FACILITIES AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE AUGUST 2008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE This page intentionally left blank - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Background and Proposed Action ...............................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................4

467

DOE F 5634  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 (09/2012) Replaces DOE F 470.2 (05-05) All Other Editions Are Obsolete U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FACILITY DATA AND APPROVAL RECORD (FDAR) 1. Facility Code: 2. Reason for Action: Awaiting Activation Add 3. Previous FDAR No: Date: 4. FDAR No: 5a. Facility Name: 5b. Doing Business As: 6. Acronym 7. Importance Rating: A Is this facility considered a Critical National Infrastructure? 8. Facility Type: 9. Facility Location: 10. Item Numbers Modified: 11. Unclassified Mailing Address: 12. Offices: a. Cognizant Security Agency: ________________ Agreement Date: ________ b. Program Secretarial Office: ________________ c. Cognizant Security Office: ________________ d. Designated Responsible Office: ________________

468

DOE/FE-0564  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Prepared by: U.S. Department of Energy Natural Gas Imports and Exports First Quarter Report 2013 LNG Trinidad and Tobago Canada Mexico Qatar Yemen NATURAL GAS IMPORTS AND EXPORTS FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2013 Office of Natural Gas Regulatory Activities Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy 202-586-9478 ngreports@hq.doe.gov Table of Contents Summary ......................................................................... 1 1 Quarterly Summary ...................................................... 3 Maps of Imports & Exports by Point of Entry/Exit ................................... 5 Tabular Summaries & Comparisons .................................................................. 11 1a Quarter in Review ...................................................................................................13

469

DOE Building Technologies Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Overview Overview September 2013 Buildings.energy.gov/BPD BuildingsPerformanceDatabase@ee.doe.gov 2 * The BPD statistically analyzes trends in the energy performance and physical & operational characteristics of real commercial and residential buildings. The Buildings Performance Database 3 Design Principles * The BPD contains actual data on existing buildings - not modeled data or anecdotal evidence. * The BPD enables statistical analysis without revealing information about individual buildings. * The BPD cleanses and validates data from many sources and translates it into a standard format. * In addition to the BPD's analysis tools, third parties will be able to create applications using the

470

DOE O 451  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

51.1B Chg 3 51.1B Chg 3 1-19-12 ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE TO DOE O 451.1B CHG 3, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM LOCATION OF CHANGES: Page Paragraph Changed To 1 footer [Update to reflect disestablishment of EH in October 2006] Delete: "Office of Environment, Safety and Health" Insert: "Office of the General Counsel" 2 4 [Insertion to reflect policy expressed in 2nd paragraph of Deputy Secretary's memorandum on "Public Involvement in the Environmental Assessment Process" (July 16, 2010)] Insert: "h. Opportunity,

471

DOE Technical Assistance Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii Collection of Customer Data for Better Buildings Guidelines For Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utility Keith Freischlag and Curtis Framel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project DOE Technical Assistance Program Team 4 - Program & Project Development & Implementation December 16, 2010 Guidelines for Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities Webinar Overview * Technical Assistance Program (TAP) * Discussion of Identifying Utility Stakeholders * Discussion of Procuring Customer Usage Data * Suggestions to Streamline Data Collection Processes * Overview of Data Reporting Requirements * Q&A Guidelines for Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities * Questions and discussion after presentation

472

DOE F 1325  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

The Department's Implementation The Department's Implementation of the "Energy Annex, Emergency Support Function 12" to the National Response Framework DOE/IG-0847 January 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 January 31, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report on The Department's Implementation of the "Energy Annex, Emergency Support Function 12" to the National Response Framework BACKGROUND As required by the National Response Framework (NRF), the Department of Energy, in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), plays an active role in responding to national-level disasters and emergencies. As described in the "Energy Annex,

473

DOE/EM-51  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SOURCE EVALUATION BOARD REPORT TEMPLATE SOURCE EVALUATION BOARD REPORT TEMPLATE JUNE 2010 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [ACQUISITION OFFICE NAME] [INITIAL/FINAL] SOURCE EVALUATION BOARD REPORT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NUMBER __________ [ACQUISITION TITLE] SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104 This report covers the [initial/final] evaluation by the Source Evaluation Board (SEB) for the: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) [ACQUISITION OFFICE NAME] [ACQUISITION TITLE] SOLICITATION NUMBER _________________ Distribution is limited to those on a need-to-know basis, and this report must be treated as "OFFICIAL USE ONLY." THIS REPORT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED. If transmitted by

474

DOE-ORP Contracting Officers - Hanford Site  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE-ORP Contracting Officers DOE - ORP ContractsProcurements ORP Contracts & Procurements Home DOE-ORP Contract Management Plans DOE-ORP Prime Contracts DOE-ORP Contracting...

475

Extension of DOE Directives on Security  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Notice extends the following directives until 12/31/02. DOE N 205.1, DOE N 205.2, DOE 205.3, DOE N 471.3, and DOE 473.6.

2002-05-06T23:59:59.000Z

476

DOE Challenge Home Label Methodology  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 2012 1 October 2012 1 Label Methodology DOE Challenge Home Label Methodology October 2012 DOE Challenge Home October 2012 2 Label Methodology Contents Background ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Comfort/Quiet .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Healthy Living ........................................................................................................................................... 7

477

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

on Office of Inspector General Reports - April 19, 2008 DOE O 221.1A, Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse to the Office of Inspector General - April 19, 2008 DOE O 221.2A,...

478

DOE: Support Implementation of EEOICPA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOEs primary role in the EEOICPA is to provide records to DOL, NIOSH and DOJ, to support claim processing, dose reconstruction and ultimately claim adjudication. The worker records provided by...

479

DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

information, use the DOE Phonebook. Latest content created by this user Jan 05, 2015 Conduct of Operations Dec 04, 2014 Certification for DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 1 Jun 29, 2010...

480

DOE/NV…325…Rev  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 DOE/NV-325-Rev. 7-01 May 2009 Nevada Test Site Waste Acceptance Criteria Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Waste Management Project Nevada Test Site Waste Acceptance Criteria May 2009 Disclaimer Notice Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: (800) 553-6847 Fax: (703) 605-6900

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe test snf" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Vehicle Test Cell Thermal...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Powertrain Research Facility Vehicle Test Cell Thermal Upgrade Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Vehicle Test Cell Thermal Upgrade 2010 DOE Vehicle Technologies and Hydrogen...

482

New INL High Energy Battery Test Facility | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

INL High Energy Battery Test Facility New INL High Energy Battery Test Facility 2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and...

483

NREL Battery Thermal and Life Test Facility | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

NREL Battery Thermal and Life Test Facility NREL Battery Thermal and Life Test Facility 2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit...

484

An Assessment of Fault Current Limiter Testing Requirements ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

An Assessment of Fault Current Limiter Testing Requirements An Assessment of Fault Current Limiter Testing Requirements The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Electricity...

485

Concept Testing and Development at the Raft River Geothermal...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Concept Testing and Development at the Raft River Geothermal Field, Idaho Concept Testing and Development at the Raft River Geothermal Field, Idaho DOE 2010 Geothermal Technologies...

486

AVTA ? PHEV Demonstrations and Testing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AVTA PHEV Demonstrations and Testing AVTA PHEV Demonstrations and Testing 2010 DOE Vehicle Technologies and Hydrogen Programs Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting,...

487

Abuse Testing of High Power Batteries | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Testing of High Power Batteries Abuse Testing of High Power Batteries 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting,...

488

Vehicle and Systems Simulation and Testing | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Vehicle and Systems Simulation and Testing Vehicle and Systems Simulation and Testing 2010 DOE Vehicle Technologies and Hydrogen Programs Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

489

Argonne Facilitation of PHEV Standard Testing Procedure (SAE...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Argonne Facilitation of PHEV Standard Testing Procedure (SAE J1711) Argonne Facilitation of PHEV Standard Testing Procedure (SAE J1711) 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle...

490

Vehicle and Systems Simulation and Testing | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

and Systems Simulation and Testing Vehicle and Systems Simulation and Testing 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

491

Vehicle and Systems Simulation and Testing | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Vehicle and Systems Simulation and Testing Vehicle and Systems Simulation and Testing Presentation from the U.S. DOE Office of Vehicle Technologies "Mega" Merit Review 2008 on...

492

Overview and Progress of the Battery Testing, Analysis, and Design...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Battery Testing, Analysis, and Design Activity Overview and Progress of the Battery Testing, Analysis, and Design Activity 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle...

493

AVTA HEV, NEV, BEV and HICEV Demonstrations and Testing | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

HEV, NEV, BEV and HICEV Demonstrations and Testing AVTA HEV, NEV, BEV and HICEV Demonstrations and Testing 2010 DOE Vehicle Technologies and Hydrogen Programs Annual Merit Review...

494

ENERGY STAR Test Procedures and Verification | Department of...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Appliance & Equipment Standards ENERGY STAR ENERGY STAR Test Procedures and Verification ENERGY STAR Test Procedures and Verification The Department of Energy (DOE) is the...

495

PHEV development test platform Utilization | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PHEV development test platform Utilization PHEV development test platform Utilization 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer...

496

Independent Oversight Inspection, Nevada Test Site - June 2007...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Emergency Management at the Nevada Test Site This report provides the more detailed results of an inspection of emergency management at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Nevada Test...

497

Post-test Cell Characterization Facility | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

test Cell Characterization Facility Post-test Cell Characterization Facility 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer...

498

HEV, PHEV, EV Test Standard Development and Validation | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HEV, PHEV, EV Test Standard Development and Validation HEV, PHEV, EV Test Standard Development and Validation 2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies...

499

HEV, PHEV, BEV Test Standard Validation | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HEV, PHEV, BEV Test Standard Validation HEV, PHEV, BEV Test Standard Validation 2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and...

500

Energy Storage Testing and Analysis High Power and High Energy...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Testing and Analysis High Power and High Energy Development Energy Storage Testing and Analysis High Power and High Energy Development 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle...