Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations...

2

Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office...

3

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office - December 2010 Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office - December 2010 December 2010 Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at DOE-Richland Operations Office The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in the Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC) at the Hanford Site. The EM-23 review included selected programs at the Hanford Site that are under the auspices of the DOE Richland Operations Office. Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations

4

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2013 April 2013 Operational Awareness of a Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance [HIAR-RL-2013-04-08] The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an onsite operational awareness review of a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) fire protection surveillance. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2013 More Documents & Publications Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project - February 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 201

5

Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which...

6

Richland Operations Office technology summary  

SciTech Connect

This document has been prepared by the Department of Energy`s Environmental Management Office of Technology Development to highlight its research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation activities funded through the Richland Operations Office. Technologies and processes described have the potential to enhance cleanup and waste management efforts.

Not Available

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

7

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 2011 June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 June 2011 Hanford Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration [HIAR-RL-2011-06-22] The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an operational awareness review of the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011

8

Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office...

9

Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People...

10

Hanford Waste Tank Plant PIA, Richland Operations Office | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Waste Tank Plant PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Waste Tank Plant PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Waste Tank Plant PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford...

11

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 June 2011 Hanford Sludge Treatment Project Review [HIAR-RL-2011-06-17] The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project - February 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - August 2011

12

Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland...

13

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Operations Office - November Richland Operations Office - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The onsite review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from August 13 to 17, 2012. The objective of this assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the DOE-RL has developed and employed appropriate methods for oversight of contractor

14

Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime Contractors Cite Past Year's Cleanup Progress Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime Contractors Cite Past Year's Cleanup Progress January 5, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Hardy, DOE (509) 376-5365 Cameron.Hardy@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office contractors achieved a great deal of cleanup progress at the Hanford Site in 2010. Below are just some of the major accomplishments of our River Corridor, Central Plateau, and Mission Support contractors: River Corridor To date, approximately half of the cleanup in the Hanford Site's 220-square-mile River Corridor is complete. The River Corridor cleanup

15

Independent Oversight Inspection, Richland Operations Office, Office of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Operations Office, Richland Operations Office, Office of River Protection, and Project Hanford Management Contract - November 2006 Independent Oversight Inspection, Richland Operations Office, Office of River Protection, and Project Hanford Management Contract - November 2006 November 2006 Inspection of Classification and Information Control Programs at the Richland Operations Office, Office of River Protection, and Project Hanford Management Contract This report presents the results of inspection activities by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, Office of Security Evaluations in the area of classification and information control (CIC) at the two DOE offices at the Hanford Site-the Richland Operations Office (RL) and the Office of River Protection (ORP)-each of which

16

Richland Operations (DOE-RL) Environmental Safety Health (ES and H) FY 2000 and FY 2001 Execution Commitment Summary  

SciTech Connect

All sites in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Complex prepare this report annually for the DOE Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH). The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the previous and current year's Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) execution commitments and the Safety and Health (S&H) resources that support these activities. The fiscal year (FY) 2000 and 2001 information and data contained in the Richland Operations Environment, Safefy and Health Fiscal Year 2002 Budget-Risk Management Summary (RL 2000a) were the basis for preparing this report. Fiscal year 2001 activities are based on the President's Amended Congressional Budget Request of $689.6 million for funding Ofice of Environmental Management (EM) $44.0 million for Fast Flux Test Facility standby less $7.0 million in anticipated DOE, Headquarters holdbacks for Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology (NE); and $55.3 million for Safeguards and Security (SAS). Any funding changes as a result of the Congressional appropriation process will be reflected in the Fiscal Year 2003 ES&H Budget-Risk Management Summary to be issued in May 2001. This report provides the end-of-year status of FY 2000 ES&H execution commitments, including actual S&H expenditures, and describes planned FY 2001 ES&H execution commitments and the S&H resources needed to support those activities. This requirement is included in the ES&H guidance contained in the FY 2002 Field Budget Call (DOE 2000).

REEP, I.E.

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 2011 June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 June 2011 Hanford Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration [HIAR-RL-2011-06-22] The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an operational awareness review of the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project - February 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June

18

Operational Awareness Rerview of a Department of Energy Richland...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the...

19

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 January 2011 Presentation of Questions Associated With the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (Onsite) Multi-Canister Overpack Cask [ARPT-RL-2011-001] The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, during a site visit from January 10-14, 2011, presented the results of a technical review of the Safety Analysis Report (SAR) for Packaging (Onsite) Multi-Canister Overpack (MCO) Cask HNF-SD-SARP-017, Rev. 3, to DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) representatives. The presentation was supported by a detailed document that discussed the individual questions.

20

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- November - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The onsite review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from August 13 to 17, 2012. The objective of this assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the DOE-RL has developed and employed appropriate methods for oversight of contractor

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 April 2011 Operational Awareness Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project [HIAR-RL-2011-04-07] The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. On November 17, 2010, a HSS representative participated in a tour of the STP test facility. The HSS representative was also briefed by the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) Project Engineer, the CHPRC STP Design Manager, and the DOE-RL principal support contract engineer. The HSS representative walked down the major components of the

22

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Operations Office and CH2M Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 April 2012 Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to observe and shadow1 a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) assessment of its contractors at the Hanford Site. The HSS reviewer observed the implementation and effectiveness of the DOE-RL assessment of two of the contractors (CHPRC and

23

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) are committed to continuous improvement and will utilize principles of the DOE Environmental Management (DOE-EM) Partnering Policy to enhance teaming to further execute the Plateau Remediation Contract. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement

24

Operational Awareness Rerview of a Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance, April 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance Dates of Activity : 04/08/2013 - 04/11/2013 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an onsite operational awareness review of a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) fire protection surveillance. Result: During the period April 8-11, 2013, an HSS representative participated in DOE-RL tours of various site facilities to review

25

Operational Awareness Rerview of a Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance, April 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance Dates of Activity : 04/08/2013 - 04/11/2013 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an onsite operational awareness review of a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) fire protection surveillance. Result: During the period April 8-11, 2013, an HSS representative participated in DOE-RL tours of various site facilities to review

26

EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 December 24, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. Workers separate a glove box for removal from Hanford’s Plutonium Finishing Plant. Workers separate a glove box for removal from Hanford's Plutonium Finishing Plant. Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. Workers separate a glove box for removal from Hanford's Plutonium Finishing Plant. RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Richland Operations Office's 2013 accomplishments ranged from cleaning up buildings and waste sites to treating a record

27

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Richland Operations Office ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to be prepared in the next 24 months, and the planned cost and schedule for each NEPA review identified. 2010 Annual Planning Summary for Richland Operations Office (RL) More...

28

Report on inspection of the performance based incentive program at the Richland Operations Office  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Fiscal Year (FY) 1995 Performance Based Incentive (PBI) Program at the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Richland Operations Office (Richland) was initiated by Richland as one part of the broader DOE Contract Reform Initiative being implemented at the Hanford Site in FY 1995. This program was identified as an area of concern by the Office of Inspections as a result of previous inspection work. Specifically, during a limited review of the construction of an Effluent Treatment Facility at the Hanford Site, we were unable to identify any written policies describing PBI program controls or implementation procedures. We were told that Richland Operations Office Program Management personnel were not directly involved in the selection of the Effluent Treatment Facility project for the PBI Program, or in the determination that this particular PBI would be established with a potential fee of $1 million.

NONE

1997-03-10T23:59:59.000Z

29

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and CH2M and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 April 2012 Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to observe and shadow1 a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) assessment of its contractors at the Hanford Site. The HSS reviewer observed the implementation and effectiveness of the DOE-RL assessment of two of the contractors (CHPRC and

30

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CH2M HILL CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) are committed to continuous improvement and will utilize principles of the DOE Environmental Management (DOE-EM) Partnering Policy to enhance teaming to further execute the Plateau Remediation Contract. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement More Documents & Publications CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company

31

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And Mission Support  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mission Mission Support Alliance, LLC Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And Mission Support Alliance, LLC Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement The U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and the Mission Support Alliance, LLC (MSA) are committed to continuous improvement and will partner together to enchance teaming to further execute the Mission Support Contract. This focused partnership is intended to improve the mission of the Hanford Site cleanup, emphasizing project safety, compliance and delivery completed on time and within cost. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And Mission Support Alliance, LLC Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement

32

DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic Telecommunication  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic Telecommunication Capacity in Benton County - Upgrade improves communications at Hanford Site, schools and libraries DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic Telecommunication Capacity in Benton County - Upgrade improves communications at Hanford Site, schools and libraries March 14, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Fiber Optic Broadband Fiber Optic Broadband Media Contact Cameron Salony, 509-376-0402 Cameron.Salony@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, Wash. - The Department of Energy (DOE), city of Richland, and Benton County's Public Utility District (Benton PUD) jointly implemented a high-capacity fiber optic cable in Richland and at the Hanford Site. The project will improve communications throughout the area.

33

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section March 28, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis An aerial view of Hanford’s 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. An aerial view of Hanford's 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. More than 8,000 feet of pipe — part of the 300 Area’s process sewer system — was removed from the 300-15 Waste Site in the north section. More than 8,000 feet of pipe - part of the 300 Area's process sewer

34

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section March 28, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis An aerial view of Hanford’s 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. An aerial view of Hanford's 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. More than 8,000 feet of pipe — part of the 300 Area’s process sewer system — was removed from the 300-15 Waste Site in the north section. More than 8,000 feet of pipe - part of the 300 Area's process sewer

35

Audit of the Richland Operations Office Site Characterization Program, IG-0368  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 1995 0, 1995 IG-1 INFORMATION: Report on "Audit of the Richland Operations Office Site Characterization Program" The Secretary BACKGROUND: With its designation as an environmental cleanup site in 1989, the Hanford Site has represented a major activity of the Department of Energy (Department). The final cleanup of this site is estimated to take over 50 years and cost close to $100 billion. Although there are many factors influencing the operations at Hanford, the Department and the Richland Operations Office (Richland) are ultimately responsible for its success. The Department and Richland are responsible for establishing procedures that ensure program goals are accomplished using the most cost-effective methods. DISCUSSION:

36

Final Environmental Assessment for the Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

562 562 Environmental Assessment Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office Richland, Washington 99352 Final January 2007 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1562 Environmental Assessment S-1 January 2007 Summary Introduction. This Environmental Assessment (EA) provides information and analyses of proposed U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) activities associated with constructing and operating a new Physical Sciences Facility (PSF) complex on DOE property located in Benton County, north of Richland, Washington. The proposed PSF would replace a number of existing research laboratories in the Hanford

37

Environmental Monitoring Plan United States Department of Energy Richland Operations Office. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Environmental Monitoring Plan was prepared for the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Richland Operations Office (RL) to implement the requirements of DOE Order 5400.1. According to the Order, each DOE site, facility, or activity that uses, generates, releases, or manages significant pollutants or hazardous materials shall prepare a written environmental monitoring plan covering two major activities: (1) effluent monitoring and (2) environmental surveillance. The plan is to contain information discussing the rationale and design criteria for the monitoring programs, sampling locations and schedules, quality assurance requirements, program implementation procedures, analytical procedures, and reporting requirements. The plan`s purpose is to assist DOE in the management of environmental activities at the Hanford Site and to help ensure that operations on the site are conducted in an environmentally safe and sound manner.

NONE

1997-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

38

Report on Inspection of the Performance Based Incentive Program at the Richland Operations Office, IG-0401  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(8-89) EFG (07-90) United States Government Department of Energy MEMORANDUM DATE: March 10, 1997 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-1 SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on "Inspection of the Performance Based Incentive Program at the Richland Operations Office" TO: The Acting Secretary BACKGROUND: The subject final report is provided for your information. While conducting other inspection work at the Richland Operations Office (Richland), the Office of Inspector General identified the Fiscal Year 1995 Richland Performance Based Incentive (PBI) Program as an area of concern. Specifically, we were unable to identify any

39

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

sewer system - was removed from the 300-15 Waste Site in the north section. RICHLAND, Wash. - EM met a Tri-Party Agreement milestone by completing cleanup of the north portion of...

40

DOE/EA-1660: Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Land's Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, WA (07/20/09)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2009 July 2009 DOE/EA-1660F Environmental Assessment Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 Final Environmental Assessment July 2009 Sum-1 Summary Introduction. This Environmental Assessment (EA) provides information and analyses of proposed U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) activities associated with consolidating existing communications operations and removing excess facilities and infrastructure within the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve (ALE) at the Hanford Site near the City of Richland, Washington. Purpose and Need. To meet long-term federal agency missions, DOE needs to reduce indirect costs and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

DOE Announces Additional Tour Seats Available: Tours of B Reactor at the Hanford Site Begin and End in Richland, Wash.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

RICHLAND, Wash. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has made additional seats available for tours of the B Reactor National Historic Landmark this July and August.

42

PNNL: Contacts - Richland Building Addresses  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for the US DOE 790 6th Street Richland WA 99354 Warehouse Phone: (509) 375-2927 PNNL Campus Map Hours of Operations: 8:00am to 3:30pm (closed for lunch) - all freight...

43

Environmental restoration and waste management site-specific plan for Richland Operations Office. [Contains glossary  

SciTech Connect

This document was prepared to implement and support the US Department of Energy-Headquarters (DOE-HQ) national plan. The national plan, entitled Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Five-Year Plan (DOE 1990b) (hereinafter referred to as the DOE-HQ Five-Year Plan) is the cornerstone of the US Department of Energy's (DOE) long-term strategy in environmental restoration and waste management. The DOE-HQ Five-Year Plan addresses overall philosophy and environmental and waste-related activities under the responsibilities of the DOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management. The plan also reaffirms DOE-HQ goals to bring its nuclear sites into environmental compliance in cooperation with its regulators and the public, and to clean up and restore the environment by 2019 (the commitment for the Hanford Site is for one year sooner, or 2018). This document is part of the site-specific plan for the US Department of Energy-Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL). It is the first revision of the original plan, which was dated December 1989 (DOE-RL 1989a). This document is a companion document to the Overview of the Hanford Cleanup Five-Year Plan (DOE-RL 1989d) and The Hanford Site Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Five-Year Plan Activity Data Sheets (DOE-RL 1991). Although there are three documents that make up the complete DOE-RL plan, this detailed information volume was prepared so it could be used as a standalone document. 71 refs., 40 figs., 28 tabs.

Not Available

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

Environmental restoration and waste management site-specific plan for Richland Operations Office. [Contains glossary  

SciTech Connect

This document was prepared to implement and support the US Department of Energy-Headquarters (DOE-HQ) national plan. The national plan, entitled Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Five-Year Plan (DOE 1990b) (hereinafter referred to as the DOE-HQ Five-Year Plan) is the cornerstone of the US Department of Energy's (DOE) long-term strategy in environmental restoration and waste management. The DOE-HQ Five-Year Plan addresses overall philosophy and environmental and waste-related activities under the responsibilities of the DOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management. The plan also reaffirms DOE-HQ goals to bring its nuclear sites into environmental compliance in cooperation with its regulators and the public, and to clean up and restore the environment by 2019 (the commitment for the Hanford Site is for one year sooner, or 2018). This document is part of the site-specific plan for the US Department of Energy-Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL). It is the first revision of the original plan, which was dated December 1989 (DOE-RL 1989a). This document is a companion document to the Overview of the Hanford Cleanup Five-Year Plan (DOE-RL 1989d) and The Hanford Site Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Five-Year Plan Activity Data Sheets (DOE-RL 1991). Although there are three documents that make up the complete DOE-RL plan, this detailed information volume was prepared so it could be used as a standalone document. 71 refs., 40 figs., 28 tabs.

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

45

Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes, November 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Review Oversight Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes November 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2

46

DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic Telecommunication Capacity in Benton County- Upgrade improves communications at Hanford Site, schools and libraries  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

RICHLAND, Wash. ? The Department of Energy (DOE), city of Richland, and Benton Countys Public Utility District (Benton PUD) jointly implemented a high-capacity fiber optic cable in Richland and at the Hanford Site. The project will improve communications throughout the area.

47

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996 Financial Statements, WR-FS-97-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE DURING THE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENT S CONSOLIDATED FISCAL YEAR 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its audit reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov

48

Environmental assessment for the resiting, construction, and operation of the Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This environmental assessment (EA) presents estimated environmental impacts from the resiting, construction, and operation of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), which is proposed to be constructed and operated on land near the south boundary of the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. The EMSL, if constructed, would be a modern research facility in which experimental, theoretical, and computational techniques can be focused on environmental restoration problems, such as the chemical and transport behavior of complex mixtures of contaminants in the environment. The EMSL design includes approximately 18,500 square meters (200,000 square feet) of floor space on a 12-hectare (30-acre) site. The proposed new site is located within the city limits of Richland in north Richland, at the south end of DOE`s 300 Area, on land to be deeded to the US by the Battelle Memorial Institute. Approximately 200 persons are expected to be employed in the EMSL and approximately 60 visiting scientists may be working in the EMSL at any given time. State-of-the-art equipment is expected to be installed and used in the EMSL. Small amounts of hazardous substances (chemicals and radionuclides) are expected to be used in experimental work in the EMSL.

Not Available

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

49

Inspection of surveillance equipment and activities at DOE Field Office, Richland  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this inspection was to review surveillance activities by the Department of Energy's (DOE) Field Office, Richland (RL) and contractor employees at the RL Hanford site for efficiency and economy and compliance with laws and regulations. The scope included surveillance activities, procedures, training, types of surveillance equipment, and management controls over the equipment and activities. We also looked at Departmental policies and procedures regarding the equipment and activities. Allegations of illegal surveillance that came to our attention during the course of this inspection were referred to the Department of Justice. As part of our review, inspectors were on-site at RL from February 11, 1991, through March 1, 1991. Follow-up trips to RL were also made in April, May, and June 1991. We also conducted interviews at Albuquerque, Savannah River, and Germantown of former RL employees and RL contractors who were on travel. Officials from DOE's Office of General Counsel (OGC), Office of Security Affairs, and Office of Safeguards and Security (S S) were also interviewed regarding the Department's purchase and possession of wiretapping and eavesdropping devices. We obtained 75 signed sworn statements from 55 individuals during the course of the inspection. 1 fig., 1 tab.

Not Available

1991-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

50

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Richland Operations Office 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance. 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - RL

51

DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic Telecommunic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

" Addthis Related Articles DOE Gives Mission Support Alliance Top Safety Award DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County Highly Radioactive Sludge Removal...

52

Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations, April 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review of Independent Oversight Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations April 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

53

Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations, April 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Review of Oversight Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations April 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

54

Report on Follow-up Inspection of the Double Funding of Security for Special Nuclear Material at Richland Operations, IG-0378  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 INFORMATION: Report on "Follow-up Inspection of the Double Funding of Security for Special Nuclear Material at the Richland Operations Office" The Secretary BACKGROUND: On June 3, 1993, the Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Inspections issued a Letter Report to the Department's Acting Chief Financial Officer which stated that during Fiscal Year 1993 the Department had requested and received $60 million, double the funding needed, for the safeguard and security of special nuclear material at the Richland Operations Office. In response to that Report, the Acting Chief Financial Officer took control of the funds and placed them into a management reserve account. A follow-up inspection was initiated to:

55

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland 2 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance.

56

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance.

57

The Hanford Site Richland Operations Office Office of River Protection Office of Science  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Manager E-mail: Susan_C_Johnson@orp.doe.gov Web Site: www.hanford.gov/orp Janice Bartram Small Business

58

A safety assessment for proposed pump mixing operations to mitigate episodic gas releases in tank 241-SY-101: Hanford Site,Richland, Washington  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This safety assessment addresses each of the elements required for the proposed action to remove a slurry distributor and to install, operate, and remove a mixing pump in Tank 241-SY-101,which is located within the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington.The proposed action is required as part of an ongoing evaluation of various mitigation concepts developed to eliminate episodic gas releases that result in hydrogen concentrations in the tank dome space that exceed the lower flammability limit.

Lentsch, J.W.

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

59

Safety assessment for proposed pump mixing operations to mitigate episodic gas releases in tank 241-101-SY: Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This safety assessment addresses each of the elements required for the proposed action to remove a slurry distributor and to install, operate, and remove a mixing pump in Tank 241-SY-101, which is located within the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. The proposed action is required as part of an ongoing evaluation of various mitigation concepts developed to eliminate episodic gas releases that result in hydrogen concentrations in the tank dome space that exceed the lower flammability limit.

Lentsch, J.W., Westinghouse Hanford

1996-05-16T23:59:59.000Z

60

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

September 10, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period August 12, 2013 through August 26, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18, 2013...

62

Enforcement Letter - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 1997 7, 1997 Mr. H. J. Hatch [ ] Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., H5-20 P.O. Box 1000 Richland, WA 99352-1000 Subject: Noncompliance Numbers NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0001 NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0002 NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0003 Dear Mr. Hatch: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of potential violations of the Quality Assurance Rule (QA Rule) nuclear safety requirements identified in the subject reports. Fluor Daniel Hanford, Incorporated, as Management and Integrating contractor for the DOE's Hanford site, has responsibility for assuring sub-tier contractors comply with its Quality Assurance Plan. On April 27 and 28, 1997, the Office of Enforcement and Investigation personnel met with members of your staff and representatives from Lockheed Martin Hanford Company (LMHC). Our purpose

63

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of September 30, 1995, WR-FS-96-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE DURING THE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENTmS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995

64

Enforcement Letter - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

24, 2001 24, 2001 Ms. M.P. Delozier [ ] CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. MSIN: H6-08 2440 Stevens Center Richland, WA 99352 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Ms. Delozier: This letter refers to a recent investigation by the Department of Energy (DOE), regarding potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830, "Nuclear Safety Management," occurring at the Hanford Tank Farms. The investigation reviewed three issues that were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. Two of the NTS reports involve the failure to perform the Technical Safety Requirement (TSR) for [ ] gas monitoring. The initial potential noncompliance occurred in January 2000, in which a Zip Cord was installed in a catch tank without first monitoring for [ ]

65

Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Import Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Link to Main Report Link to Main Report RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: COVER SHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office TITLE: Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286D2) CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy, A6-38 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352-0550 Telephone: (800) 426-4914 Fax: (509) 372-1926 Email: hsweis@rl.gov For further information on the Department's National Environmental Policy Act process,

66

Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Import Statement, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COVER SHEET 1 COVER SHEET 1 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office 2 3 TITLE: 4 Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact 5 Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286D2) 6 7 CONTACT: 8 For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy, A6-38 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352-0550 Telephone: (800) 426-4914 Fax: (509) 372-1926 Email: hsweis@rl.gov For further information on the Department's National Environmental Policy Act process, contact: Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, EH-42 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.

67

Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COVER SHEET COVER SHEET U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office TITLE: Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286F) CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy, A6-38 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352-0550 Telephone: (509) 376-6536 Fax: (509) 372-1926 Email: hsweis@rl.gov For further information on the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, contact: Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, EH-42 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.

68

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

June 5, 2013 June 5, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period May 16, through May 30, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC - Shannon Brennan, DOE-ID, (208) 526-3993. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) [No items to Report] Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) May 15 - 30, 2013: CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC discovered three instances of new information at the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) which have the potential to impact the nuclear safety analysis

69

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

January 6, 2014 January 6, 2014 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period November 01, 2013 through November 30, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Nothing to Report Notable Accomplishments: Contracting companies supporting EM's cleanup program and the Office of Nuclear Energy at the Idaho site volunteered to be among the first to use a new DOE

70

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

18, 2013 18, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period September 30, 2013 through October 31, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) October 15, 2013: A manager at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) determined that the AMWTP Safety Analysis process required review due to an operational trend of fire/combustion events in the Treatment Facility (TF) box lines. Safety analysis for the TF is

71

Enforcement Letter-Richland-07/31/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 1998 1, 1998 Mr. R. D. Hanson [ ] Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. P.O. Box 1000 MS/H5-20 Richland, WA 99352-1000 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Number NTS-RL--PHMC-PHMCGENL-1998-0003 Dear Mr. Hanson: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding the failure of Fluor Daniel Hanford, Incorporated (FDH) to effectively complete corrective actions for Enforcement Action 96-02 (EA 96-02), although FDH informed the DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) that such work had been completed. 10 CFR 830.120 (c)(1)(iii) (Quality Improvement) mandates processes to detect and prevent quality problems be established and implemented. 10 CFR 830.120 (c)(2)(i) (Work Processes) requires that work be performed to established technical standards

72

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

26, 2013 26, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period July 29, 2013 through August 12, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) July 31, 2013: The Idaho Treatment Group, LLC (ITG), the managing contractor for the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project received a warning letter from the State of Idaho's Department of Environmental quality regarding self- reported RCRA permit violations which

73

Energy Department Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Operation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

full and open basis to manage and operate DOE's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). PNNL is a world-class multi-program national laboratory located in Richland,...

74

Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan for the 200-UP-1 Groundwater Operable Unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Revision  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This work plan identifies the objectives, tasks, and schedule for conducting a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study for the 200-UP-1 Groundwater Operable Unit in the southern portion of the 200 West Groundwater Aggregate Area of the Hanford Site. The 200-UP-1 Groundwater Operable Unit addresses contamination identified in the aquifer soils and groundwater within its boundary, as determined in the 200 West Groundwater Aggregate Area Management Study Report (AAMSR) (DOE/RL 1992b). The objectives of this work plan are to develop a program to investigate groundwater contaminants in the southern portion of the 200 West Groundwater Aggregate Area that were designated for Limited Field Investigations (LFIs) and to implement Interim Remedial Measures (IRMs) recommended in the 200 West Groundwater AAMSR. The purpose of an LFI is to evaluate high priority groundwater contaminants where existing data are insufficient to determine whether an IRM is warranted and collect sufficient data to justify and implement an IRM, if needed. A Qualitative Risk Assessment (QRA) will be performed as part of the LFI. The purpose of an IRM is to develop and implement activities, such as contaminant source removal and groundwater treatment, that will ameliorate some of the more severe potential risks of groundwater contaminants prior to the RI and baseline Risk Assessment (RA) to be conducted under the Final Remedy Selection (FRS) at a later date. This work plan addresses needs of a Treatability Study to support the design and implementation of an interim remedial action for the Uranium-{sup 99}{Tc}-Nitrate multi-contaminant IRM plume identified beneath U Plant.

Not Available

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

75

EA-1860: Richland Renewable Energy Waste-to-Energy Project, Richland...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0: Richland Renewable Energy Waste-to-Energy Project, Richland, Wisconsin EA-1860: Richland Renewable Energy Waste-to-Energy Project, Richland, Wisconsin Summary This EA evaluates...

76

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18, 2013 - 5:11pm Addthis WASHINGON, D. C. - After conducting a rigorous competitive selection process, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations, LLC (team includes members comprised of Parent Company Fluor Federal Services, Inc., of Arlington, Virginia and major subcontractors MRIGlobal of Kansas City, Missouri; Booz Allen Hamilton of Mclean, Virginia; and ASRC Petroleum Operations and Maintenance of Anchorage, Alaska) has been awarded a management and operating contract valued at $1.46 billion to run DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR)

77

Environmental Assessment Use of Existing Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) operates the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. The DOE needs to identify and operate onsite locations for a continued supply of raw aggregate materials [approximately 7,600,000 cubic meters (10,000,000 cubic yards) over the next 10 years] for new facility construction, maintenance of existing facilities and transportation corridors, and fill and capping material for remediation and other sites.

N /A

2001-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

78

Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for the Environmental for the Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 1992 U.S. Department of Energy Richland, Washington 99352 Contents 1 . 0 Summary . . 2.0 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action . . . . . . 3.0 Proposed Action and Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 Proposed Action 3.2 Onsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Offsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . 3.4 No Action Alternative ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 Environmental Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 Construction Impacts 5.1.1 Atmospheric Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2 Terrestrial Impacts . 5.1.3 Impacts on CERCLA Remedial Actions . 5.1.4 Construction Accidents .

79

United States Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Environmental Protection Implementation Plan: November 9, 1993, to November 9, 1994  

SciTech Connect

The hub of today`s programs at the Hanford Site are activities dedicated to managing stored and new wastes and cleanup of waste sites. To ensure focused planning and implementing efforts for these programs, management of the site is assigned to DOE`s Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management. This report describes policies and procedures in the following areas: Compliance activities; Environmental restoration; Waste management; and Technology development. Procedures for notification of environmental occurrences, long-range environmental protection planning and reporting, waste management programs; environmental monitoring programs, and quality assurance and data verification are also described and discussed.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

80

RCRA facility investigation/corrective measures study work plan for the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The 200-UP-2 Operable Unit is one of two source operable units at the U Plant Aggregate Area at the Hanford Site. Source operable units include waste management units and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of radioactive and/or hazardous substance contamination. This work plan, while maintaining the title RFI/CMS, presents the background and direction for conducting a limited field investigation in the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit, which is the first part of the process leading to final remedy selection. This report discusses the background, prior recommendations, goals, organization, and quality assurance for the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit Work Plan. The discussion begins with a summary of the regulatory framework and the role of the work plan. The specific recommendations leading into the work plan are then addressed. Next, the goals and organization of the report are discussed. Finally, the quality assurance and supporting documentation are presented.

Not Available

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Red Lion Hotel Richland Hanford House Richland, Washington U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lion Hotel Richland Hanford House Lion Hotel Richland Hanford House Richland, Washington U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange April 13 - 14, 2010 Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange 1 Welcome Dear Participant, On behalf of the Department of Energy and the Savannah River National Laboratory, we welcome you to the Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange. Each of you bring a wealth of experience from a variety of different perspectives that will be essential for the effective and compliant imple- mentation of performance and risk assessments in support of tank closure, site operations, and area completion projects. The Performance Assess-

82

Remedial investigation/feasibility study work plan for the 100-BC-2 operable unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

This work plan and attached supporting project plans establish the operable unit setting and the objectives, procedures, tasks, and schedule for conducting the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) for the 100-BC-2 operable unit in the 100 Area of the Hanford Site. The 100 Area is one of four areas at the Hanford Site that are on the US Environmental Protection Agency`s (EPA) National Priorities List under CERCLA. The 100-BC-2 operable unit is one of two source operable units in the 100-B/C Area (Figure ES-1). Source operable units are those that contain facilities and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of hazardous substance contamination. The 100-BC-2 source operable unit contains waste sites that were formerly in the 100-BC-2, 100-BC-3, and 100-BC-4 operable units. Because of their size and geographic location, the waste sites from these two operable units were added to 100-BC-2. This allows for a more efficient and effective investigation of the remaining 100-B/C Reactor area waste sites. The investigative approach to waste sites associated with the 100-BC-2 operable unit are listed in Table ES-1. The waste sites fall into three general categories: high priority liquid waste disposal sites, low priority liquid waste disposal sites, and solid waste burial grounds. Several sites have been identified as candidates for conducting an IRM. Two sites have been identified as warranting additional limited field sampling. The two sites are the 116-C-2A pluto crib, and the 116-C-2C sand filter.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

DOE to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory DOE to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory February 16, 2006 - 11:55am Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that it intends to seek competitive bids for the management and operations contract for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, Washington. The current five-year contract expires September 30, 2007. "The competitive process is the best method to provide the American taxpayer an optimum management team for PNNL, one of our outstanding national laboratories," Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director of the DOE Office of Science, said. Battelle Memorial Institute, a non-profit organization based in Columbus,

84

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Isolation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant April 20, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Bill Taylor Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center (803) 952-8564 Deb Gill U.S. DOE Carlsbad Field Office (575) 234-7270 CARLSBAD, N.M. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC (members comprised of URS Energy & Construction, Inc., of Boise, Idaho, and Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Group, Inc., of Lynchburg, Virginia, and Major Subcontractor, AREVA Federal Services LLC, of Bethesda, Maryland) has been awarded a $1.3 billion contract for management and operating (M&O) at DOE's Waste

85

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 22, 2011 August 22, 2011 CX-006835: Categorical Exclusion Determination 241-T Tank Farm Debris Barrier Fence CX(s) Applied: B1.11 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office, Golden Field Office August 11, 2011 CX-006490: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bat Roost Tower Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.20 Date: 08/11/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 28, 2011 CX-006063: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Firebreak Maintenance on the Hanford Site During Calendar Year 2011 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006092: Categorical Exclusion Determination

86

Richland Environmental Restoration Project management action process document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A critical mission of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is the planning, implementation, and completion of environmental restoration programs at DOE facilities. An integral part of this mission involves the safe and cost-effective environmental restoration of the Hanford Site. For over 40 years the Hanford Site supported United States national defense programs, largely through the production of nuclear materials. One legacy of historical Hanford Site operations is a significant waste inventory of radioactive and/or regulated chemical materials. Releases of these materials have, in some cases, contaminated the Hanford Site environment. The DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) is responsible for protecting human health and the environment from potential Hanford Site environmental hazards by identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks posed by contaminated sites.

NONE

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

offers a significant benefit to water-intensive industrial processes such as oil-gas fracking operations that use 3 to 5 million gallons of water per well (video at www.inl.gov...

88

DOE?s Idaho Operations Office Issues 2011-Beyond Strategic...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the Department of Energys Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) FY 2011 and Beyond Strategic Plan. This plan ensures flow-down and alignment of national objectives to our...

89

DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator Training  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator Training System for Supercritical Coal Power Plants DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator Training System for Supercritical Coal Power Plants December 10, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - A new U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) cooperative research and development agreement to develop, test, and deploy a dynamic simulator and operator training system (OTS) could eventually help commercialize important carbon capture technologies at the nation's power plants. The high-fidelity, real-time OTS for a generic supercritical once-through (SCOT) pulverized-coal power plant will be installed at the National Energy Technology Laboratory's (NETL's) Advanced Virtual Energy Simulation

90

PIA - Richland Health Services Scheduling | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Health Services Scheduling PIA - Richland Health Services Scheduling PIA - Richland Health Services Scheduling PIA - Richland Health Services Scheduling More Documents &...

91

DOE Issues Request for Proposals for Hanford Site Occupational Medical Services  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

RICHLAND, Wash. The Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for an Occupational Medical Services contract at the Hanford Site. The solicitation is for a small-business contractor to perform occupational medical services for the DOE Richland Operations Office and Office of River Protection.

92

Enforcement Letter-Richland-09/22/1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 1995 2, 1995 NTS No. NTS-RL-WHC-BPLANT-1995-0001 Westinghouse Hanford Corporation ATTN: D.J. Swaim [ ] P.O. Box 1970 MSIN: B3-51 Richland, WA 99352 Dear Sirs: Subject: Noncompliance with 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at B Plant/Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Hanford B Plant/Waste Encapsulation Facility (WESF). These potential noncompliances were identified by WHC on May 8, 1995, during a self-initiated comprehensive assessment of the facilities Operational Safety Requirements (OSR) program and reported to DOE on May 24, 1995.

93

Environmental Assessment K Pool 'Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOERA-1 11 1 DOERA-1 11 1 Environmental Assessment K Pool 'Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Emrgy Richland, Washington December 1996 DOEEA-1111 ENVIRONMJ3'NTAL ASSESSMENT K POOL 'F'ISH REARING HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RICHLAND, WASHINGTON December 1996 This page intentionally left blank. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. 1 ' U.S. Department of Energy summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has a need to respond to a request to lease facilities at the Hanford Site 100-KE and 100-KW filter plant pools (K Pools) for fish rearing activities. These fish rearing activities would be: (1) business ventures with public h

94

EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of expansion or continued use of existing sand and gravel pits located on the Hanford Site (Pits F, H, N, 6, 9, 18, 21, 23, 24, 30, and 34) and establishing one new borrow area source in the 100 Area for ongoing construction activities and fill material following remediation activities. The scope of this EA does not include borrow sources for silt-loam material. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 15, 2013 EA-1934: Mitigation Action Plan Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

95

EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, 4: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of expansion or continued use of existing sand and gravel pits located on the Hanford Site (Pits F, H, N, 6, 9, 18, 21, 23, 24, 30, and 34) and establishing one new borrow area source in the 100 Area for ongoing construction activities and fill material following remediation activities. The scope of this EA does not include borrow sources for silt-loam material. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 15, 2013 EA-1934: Mitigation Action Plan Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

96

DOE-Idaho Operations Office | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-Idaho Operations Office DOE-Idaho Operations Office Offices in Idaho DOE-Idaho Operations Office More Documents & Publications Idaho Cleanup Project CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC Bechtel...

97

Richland Environmental Restoration Project management action process document  

SciTech Connect

This document is the prescribed means for providing direct input to the US Department of Energy Headquarters regarding the status, accomplishments, strategy, and issues of the Richland Environmental Restoration Project. The project mission, organizational interfaces, and operational history of the Hanford Site are provided. Remediation strategies are analyzed in detail. The document includes a status of Richland Environmental Restoration project activities and accomplishments, and it presents current cost summaries, schedules, and technical baselines.

NONE

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

98

DOE/EA-1728-F Environmental Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8-F 8-F Environmental Assessment Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 DOE/EA-1728-F 1 2 3 4 5 6 This page intentionally left blank. 7 8 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1728-F Final Environmental Assessment iii February 2012 CONTENTS 1 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 3 1.1 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT DETERMINATION 4 RECOMMENDATION ...................................................................................................... 1 5 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION ........................................................... 1 6

99

Richland/Office of River Protection | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland/Office of River Protection Richland/Office of River Protection Richland/Office of River Protection Below are compliance agreements and accompanying summaries for the Richland Operations Office and Office of River Protection at the Hanford site. Settlement Agreement re: Washington v. Bodman, January 6, 2006 Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 Summary Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 Summary Tank Stabilization September 30, 1999 Tank Stabilization September 30, 1999 Summary U.S. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement for the Hanford Site, February 7, 1994 U.S. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement for the Hanford Site, February

100

PIA - Richland FOIA Folder Within Integrated Data Management...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland FOIA Folder Within Integrated Data Management PIA - Richland FOIA Folder Within Integrated Data Management PIA - Richland FOIA Folder Within Integrated Data Management PIA...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Notice of Intent To Prepare the Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA (DOE/EIS-0391) (2/2/06)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 Federal Register 5 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 22 / Thursday, February 2, 2006 / Notices addressed as follows: Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability (Mail Code OE-20), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0350 (FAX 202-586-5860). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Russell (Program Office) 202-586- 9624 or Michael Skinker (Program Attorney) 202-586-2793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exports of electricity from the United States to a foreign country are regulated and require authorization under section 202(e) of the Federal Power Act (FPA) (16 U.S.C. 824a(e)). On December 14, 2005, the Department of Energy (DOE) received an application from MAG E.S. to transmit electric energy from the United States to Canada. MAG E.S. is a Canadian

102

EIS-0467: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE announces its intent to prepare an EIS for the Acquisition of a Natural Gas Pipeline and Natural Gas Utility Service at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (Natural Gas Pipeline or NGP EIS), and initiate a 30-day public scoping period.

103

EIS-0391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, Washington |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, 391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, Washington EIS-0391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, Washington Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts for the following three key areas: (1) retrieval, treatment, and disposal of waste from 149 single-shell tanks (SSTs) and 28 double-shell tanks and closure of the SST system, (2) decommissioning of the Fast Flux Test Facility, a nuclear test reactor, and (3) disposal of Hanford's waste and other DOE sites' low-level and mixed low-level radioactive waste. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download December 13, 2013 EIS-0391: Record of Decision Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for

104

CRAD, DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility CRAD, DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility January 2005 A section of Appendix C to...

105

DOE Idaho Operations Office Manager Elizabeth Sellers leaving...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Idaho Operations Office Manager Elizabeth Sellers leaving Department Elizabeth Sellers, manager of the U.S. Department of Energys Idaho Operations Office, announced today...

106

EIS-0467: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA 7: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA EIS-0467: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA Summary This EIS will evaluate the environmental impacts of a proposal to enter into a contract with a licensed natural gas supplier in Washington State to construct, operate, and maintain a natural gas pipeline. The pipeline would deliver natural gas to support the Waste Treatment Plant and the 242-A Evaporator operations in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Site. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. For more information, contact: Mr. Douglas Chapin, NEPA Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550, MSIN A5-11 Richland, WA 99352 Documents Available for Download January 23, 2012 EIS-0467: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and

107

EA-1178: 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

78: 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, 78: 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1178: 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for a proposed energy conservation measure for a number of buildings in the 300 Area of the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site. The proposed action includes replacing the centralized heating system with heating units for individual buildings or groups of buildings, constructing new natural gas pipelines to provide a source for many of these units and constructing a central control building to operate and maintain the system. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 12, 1997 EA-1178: Finding of No Significant Impact

108

DOE O 210.2A, DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Order institutes a DOE wide program for the management of operating experience to prevent adverse operating incidents and facilitate the sharing of good ...

2011-04-08T23:59:59.000Z

109

Town of Richland | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Richland Richland Jump to: navigation, search Name Town of Richland Facility Town of Richland Sector Wind energy Facility Type Small Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Sustainable Energy Development Energy Purchaser Town of Richland Location Richland NY Coordinates 43.56504687°, -76.03708506° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":43.56504687,"lon":-76.03708506,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

110

Program desk manual for occupational safety and health -- U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations, Office of Environment Safety and Health  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The format of this manual is designed to make this valuable information easily accessible to the user as well as enjoyable to read. Each chapter contains common information such as Purpose, Scope, Policy and References, as well as information unique to the topic at hand. This manual can also be provided on a CD or Hanford Internet. Major topics include: Organization and program for operational safety; Occupational medicine; Construction and demolition; Material handling and storage; Hoisting and rigging; Explosives; Chemical hazards; Gas cylinders; Electrical; Boiler and pressure vessels; Industrial fire protection; Industrial hygiene; and Safety inspection checklist.

Musen, L.G.

1998-08-27T23:59:59.000Z

111

CRAD, DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility CRAD, DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility January 2005 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a DOE independent oversight assessment of the Y-12 Site Office's programs for oversight of its contractors at the Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility More Documents & Publications

112

EA-1728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, 28: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts from vegetation management in the "project area" of the Hanford Site. The project area excludes most of the Hanford Reach National Monument that is managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) under permit from DOE. Vegetation managment under the EA would be consistent with and complement similar efforts currently being performed by the USFWS on the Monument. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA, and that preparation of

113

EA-1728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, 728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts from vegetation management in the "project area" of the Hanford Site. The project area excludes most of the Hanford Reach National Monument that is managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) under permit from DOE. Vegetation managment under the EA would be consistent with and complement similar efforts currently being performed by the USFWS on the Monument. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA, and that preparation of

114

DOE Office of Science Computing Facility Operational Assessment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Assessment (OA) Review of the efficiencies in the steady-state operations of each of the DOE Office of Science High Performance Computing (HPC) Facilities. * OMB requirement for...

115

DOE Selects ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Addthis WASHINGTON - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the Alliance for Sustainable Energy (ASE) LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor...

116

DOE Idaho Operations Office wins Safety & Health Outreach Award...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Idaho Operations Office wins Safety & Health Outreach Award from Voluntary Protection Program Participants Association, Inc. DOE-Idaho's Quality & Safety Division Industrial...

117

DOE Names New Director of Idaho Operations Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Names New Director of Idaho Operations Office Idaho Falls, ID - The Department of Energy today announced that Rick Provencher has been named manager of its Rick Provencher...

118

DOE O 473.3, Protection Program Operations  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Order establishes requirements for the management and operation of the DOE Federal Protective Forces (FPF), Contractor Protective Forces (CPF), and the ...

2011-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

119

Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Cross-referenced to DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations. Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Cross-referenced to DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations. This is an open-book evaluation. Complete the questions, and submit your answers (hand-written or electronically) to the Training Center. Someone will check and grade your answers. If you achieve a score of at least 80%, you will receive a completion certificate. Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide Review Questions More Documents & Publications U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals, Self-Study Guide

120

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2012 5, 2012 CX-009658: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009657: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009656: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facility Safety

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Richland Operations Office (Hanford) - Enforcement Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Inc. - Press Release, December 16, 2005 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Fluor Hanford, Incorporated, related to Deficiencies with the Design and Safety Basis of the...

122

Contractor Fee Payments - Richland Operations Office | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications Contractor Fee Payments - Office of River Protection Contractor Fee Payments - Savannah River Site Office Contractor Fee Payments - Carlsbad Field...

123

EA-1111: K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1111: K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of...

124

EA-1562: Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

562: Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility 562: Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington EA-1562: Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of DOE proposed activities associated with constructing and operating a new Physical Sciences Facility (PSF) complex on DOE property located in Benton County, north of Richland, Washington. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD June 14, 2013 EA-1562-SA-1: Supplement Analysis Final Environmental Assessment of Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland,

125

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuratio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 November 1993 DOE STANDARD GUIDE FOR OPERATIONAL CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Including the Adjunct Programs of Design Reconstitution and Material Condition and Aging...

126

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

422.1 422.1 CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS DOE O 422.1 Conduct of Operations Familiar Level June 2011 1 June 2011 DOE O 422.1 CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What is the purpose of DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations? 2. What are the typical methods of implementing DOE O 422.1 guidelines? 3. What are the specific requirements as described in attachment 2 of DOE O 422.1? 4. How do the DOE Technical Standards support the specific requirements in DOE O 422.1 Note: If you think that you can complete the practice at the end of this level without working through the instructional material and/or the examples, complete the practice

127

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14, 2012 14, 2012 CX-009693: Categorical Exclusion Determination CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring, December 2012 to December 2013 CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009692: Categorical Exclusion Determination CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Cleanup Actions, December 2012 to December 2013 CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009673: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington

128

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012 CX-007980: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 13, 2012 CX-007979: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.17 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 13, 2012 CX-007978: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington

129

Microsoft Word - DOE-EA-1707D_Revised_Predecisional_EA Closure_NRDWL-SWL08232011.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7D 7D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT AUGUST 2011 Environmental Assessment Closure of Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill (NRDWL) and Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 DOE/EA-1707D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT AUGUST 2011 DOE/EA-1707D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT iii AUGUST 2011 Contents 1 1 Introduction and Purpose and Need ............................................................................................. 1-1 2 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 3 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................... 1-2 4

130

Richland Community College | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Richland Community College Richland Community College Jump to: navigation, search Name Richland Community College Facility Richland Community College Sector Wind energy Facility Type Small Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Location Decatur IL Coordinates 39.88666061°, -88.89538586° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.88666061,"lon":-88.89538586,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

131

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site May 29, 2008 - 12:51pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), LLC has been selected as the tank operations contractor to store, retrieve and treat Hanford tank waste and close the tank farms at DOE's Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $7.1 billion over ten years (a five-year base period with options to extend it for up to five years). WRPS is a limited liability company comprised of Washington Group

132

DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances December 20, 2005 - 11:44am Addthis DOE finds emergency; determines plant will help electric reliability WASHINGTON, D.C. - Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman today issued an order requiring Mirant Corporation's Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia (Mirant) to immediately resume limited operation. The order will help provide electric reliability for Washington, D.C., and will do so at the lowest reasonable impact to the environment. "After weighing all of the information, I believe an emergency situation exists, and that issuance of this order is in the public interest. This order will provide the level of electricity reliability necessary to keep

133

DOE-STD-3006-95; DOE Standard Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3006-95 3006-95 November 1995 SUPERSEDING DOE-STD-3006-93 November 1993 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-3006-95 i PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) FOREWORD 1. DOE 0 425.1 establishes the requirement to conduct Operational Readiness Reviews

134

DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-05-3: Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman today issued an order requiring Mirant Corporation's Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia (Mirant) to immediately resume limited operation. The order will help provide electric reliability for Washington, D.C., and will do so at the lowest reasonable impact to the environment. DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances More Documents & Publications Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan

135

DOE invites public to mercury storage environmental impact statement...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CO; DOE Hanford Site, Richland, WA; DOE Idaho site, Idaho Falls, ID; DOE Kansas City Plant, Kansas City, MO; DOE Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC; Hawthorne Army Depot,...

136

Operations Jim Irby MIT-PSFC DoE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Operations Operations Jim Irby MIT-PSFC DoE Quarterly 4/28/2005 Outline * Machine status and run statistics * Cryopump Development * Status of other projects * Short term plans DoE Quarterly 4/28/2005 Machine Status and Run Statistics History * C-Mod resumed plasma operation on Feb 4 th 2005 * Number of discharges so far this campaign: 684 * Startup reliability including plasma conditioning period: 75% * Startup reliability last two weeks: 87% Major Tasks * Moly/BN comparison * Commissioning of lower hybrid system * Commissioning of Long Pulse DNB DoE Quarterly 4/28/2005 Status * Pre-boronization run period complete * Vessel is now boronized with very low H/(H+D) * Lower hybrid and DNB commissioning ongoing (detailed talks to follow) * 6.75 weeks of our 17 week campaign have been completed - C-Mod Runs

137

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site May 29, 2008 - 12:51pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), LLC has been selected as the tank operations contractor to store, retrieve and treat Hanford tank waste and close the tank farms at DOE's Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $7.1 billion over ten years (a five-year base period with options to extend it for up to five years). WRPS is a limited liability company comprised of Washington Group

138

DOE-EM-STD-5505-96; DOE Limited Standard Operations Assessments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM-STD-5505-96 EM-STD-5505-96 May 1996 DOE LIMITED STANDARD OPERATIONS ASSESSMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA OPER Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009462 DOE-EM-STD-5505-96 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy limited standard is approved for use by all DOE-EM field components. 2. Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, deletions) and any pertinent data that

139

EA-1915: Conveyance of Approximately 1,641 Acres of Unimproved Land to the Tri-City Development Council, the Local Community Reuse Organization, Richland, WA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA will evaluate the environmental impacts of conveyance of approximately 1,641 acres of unimproved land at DOEs Hanford Site, Richland, Washington to the Tri-City Development Council (TRIDEC), the local community reuse organization (CRO).

140

DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances December 20, 2005 - 11:44am Addthis DOE finds emergency; determines plant will help electric reliability WASHINGTON, D.C. - Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman today issued an order requiring Mirant Corporation's Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia (Mirant) to immediately resume limited operation. The order will help provide electric reliability for Washington, D.C., and will do so at the lowest reasonable impact to the environment. "After weighing all of the information, I believe an emergency situation exists, and that issuance of this order is in the public interest. This order will provide the level of electricity reliability necessary to keep

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Evaluation of injury/illness recordkeeping pilot course taught in Richland, Washington, June 18, 1992  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes trainee evaluations for the Safety Training Section course, Injury/Illness Recordkeeping which was conducted June 18, at Hanford, in richland, Washington. This class was the second pilot course taught. This class was designed to aquaint attendees with DOE orders 5484.1, 5484.1A, draft 3 and OSHA regulations found in 29 CFR 1904.

Wright, T.S.

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1728-F Final Environmental Assessment F-1 February 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EA-1728-F DOE/EA-1728-F Final Environmental Assessment F-1 February 2012 APPENDIX F FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR INTEGRATED VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ON THE HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON (DOE/EA-1728) AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY An Environmental Assessment (EA) for Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (DOE/EA-1728) has been prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA); the Council on Environmental Quality's Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations [CFR], Parts 1500-1508); and DOE's National Environmental Policy Act Implementing

143

Enforcement Letter-Richland-07/06/1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 1995 6, 1995 NTS No. NTS-RL--WHC-PUREX-1995-0001 Westinghouse Hanford Corporation ATTN: Mr. Ronald J. Bliss [ ] P.O. Box 1970 MSIN: B3-04 Richland, WA 99350 Subject: Noncompliance with 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility Gentlemen: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) investigation of an event that occurred between February 22-March 7, 1995, at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility (PUREX) at DOE's Hanford site. The event, which involved the cutting of a highly contaminated canyon exhaust air sampling probe as part of waste disposal activities without adequate management controls, resulted in your decision to

144

DOE Community Transition Contacts | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

About Us » Contact Us » DOE Community Transition Contacts About Us » Contact Us » DOE Community Transition Contacts DOE Community Transition Contacts Headquarters David Geiser, Director Office of Legacy Management, LM-1 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 (202) 586-8324 (202) 586-8403 (FAX) david.geiser@hq.doe.gov Field HANFORD Colleen French U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 A7-75 Richland, WA 99352 (509) 373-5985 (509) 373-1563 (FAX) colleen_c_french@rl.gov IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY Jacqie Gernant, Program Manager National Security/Technology Partnership Division 2525 Fremont Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83415 (208) 526-1742 (208) 526-0727 (FAX) gernanja@id.doe.gov MOUND Jane Powell Office of Legacy Management, LM-20 U.S. Department of Energy 10995 Hamilton-Cleves Highway

145

Richland, Mississippi: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Richland, Mississippi: Energy Resources Richland, Mississippi: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 32.2390366°, -90.1584206° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":32.2390366,"lon":-90.1584206,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

146

Richland Electric Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Richland Electric Coop Richland Electric Coop Place Wisconsin Utility Id 15983 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location MRO NERC MRO Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Ag-Residential Service Residential Controlled Air-Conditioner Credit Residential Controlled Water Heater Credit Residential Duel Fuel Rate Large Agricultural Demand Management Rate Commercial Large Commercial Industrial Service- Contracted Service Commercial Large Commercial and Industrial Demand Management Rate Commercial Large Commercial- Industrial Service Commercial

147

Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts 70.4_Cooperative_Audit_Strategy_0.pdf 70.5_Contractor_Compensation_-_Variable_Pay_1.pdf 70.7_Introduction_1.pdf 70.7_ch2_Environment,_Safety_and_Health_1.pdf 70.7_ch3_Contractor_Human_Resource_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch4_Security_1.pdf 70.7_ch5_Performance_Measurement_and_Assessment_1.pdf 70.7_ch6_Patent_and_Data_Rights_1.pdf 70.7_ch7_Financial_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch8_Business_and_Contract_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch10_Subcontract_Management_3.pdf 70.7_ch11_Real_Property,_Personal_Property_and_Transportation_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch12_Diversity_Plan,_EEO_and_Small_Business_1.pdf 70.7_appB_Related_Internet_Web_Sites_1.pdf 70.7_appC_Contractor_Purchasing_System_Reviews_Risk_Assessment_Matrix_1.pdf

148

Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts 0 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts 70.4_Cooperative_Audit_Strategy_0.pdf 70.5_Contractor_Compensation_-_Variable_Pay_1.pdf 70.7_Introduction_1.pdf 70.7_ch2_Environment,_Safety_and_Health_1.pdf 70.7_ch3_Contractor_Human_Resource_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch4_Security_1.pdf 70.7_ch5_Performance_Measurement_and_Assessment_1.pdf 70.7_ch6_Patent_and_Data_Rights_1.pdf 70.7_ch7_Financial_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch8_Business_and_Contract_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch10_Subcontract_Management_3.pdf 70.7_ch11_Real_Property,_Personal_Property_and_Transportation_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch12_Diversity_Plan,_EEO_and_Small_Business_1.pdf 70.7_appB_Related_Internet_Web_Sites_1.pdf 70.7_appC_Contractor_Purchasing_System_Reviews_Risk_Assessment_Matrix_1.pdf

149

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 CHAPTER 2 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR OPERATIONAL CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT This guidance is appropriate for high-hazard facilities expected to operate for an extended period. Since DOE facilities vary in hazard level and circumstances of operation, a graded approach to implementation should be adopted. 2.1 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ELEMENT The program management element of a configuration management (CM) program coordinates program development and implementation and ensures overall program effectiveness. This element leads the development of the other CM program elements. Development of an effective CM program should be initiated promptly, where needed, to address known issues, to improve compliance with various DOE Orders, and to produce the benefits of improved safety, reduced errors, and increased efficiency.

150

Microsoft Word - doe_EIS_0245F-SA-03_080411a.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5F-SA-03 5F-SA-03 Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 August 2011 DOE/EIS-0245F-SA-03 iii Summary 1 This supplement analysis (SA) has been prepared to allow a determination by the U.S. Department of 2 Energy (DOE) on whether further National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) review is needed 3 as DOE continues to manage spent nuclear fuel (SNF), including knockout pot (KOP) product material, in 4 multi-canister overpacks (MCOs) at the Hanford Site's Canister Storage Building (CSB). 5 In January 1996, the DOE issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (K Basins FEIS) on 6

151

FY 2007 Operating Plan for DOE--March 16, 2007.xls | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Plan for DOE--March 16, 2007.xls FY 2007 Operating Plan for DOE--March 16, 2007.xls U.S Department of Energy 2007 operating plan by appropriation. FY 2007 Operating Plan for...

152

Geothermal reservoir technology research at the DOE Idaho Operations Office  

SciTech Connect

Geothermal reservoir technology research projects managed at the Department of Energy Idaho Falls Operations office (DOE-ID) account for a large portion of the Department of Energy funding for reservoir technology research (approximately 7 million dollars in FY-95). DOE-ID managed projects include industry coupled geothermal exploration drilling, cooperative research projects initiated through the Geothermal Technology Organization (GTO), and other geothermal reservoir technology research projects. A solicitation for cost-shared industry coupled drilling has been completed and one zward has been made in FY-95. Another solicitation for industry coupled drilling may be conducted in the spring of 1996. A separate geothermal research technology research, development and demonstration solicitation will result in multiple year awards over the next 2 years. The goals of these solicitations are to ensure competition for federal money and to get the Government and the geothermal industry the most useful information for their research dollars.

Creed, Bob

1996-01-24T23:59:59.000Z

153

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-93-Pt.2 3-93-Pt.2 November 1993 DOE STANDARD GUIDE FOR OPERATIONAL CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Including the Adjunct Programs of Design Reconstitution and Material Condition and Aging Management PART ll U.S. Department of Energy AREA CMAN Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution Is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. Order No. DE94005408 i CONTENTS FOREWORD .

154

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 1, 2011 March 1, 2011 CX-005367: Categorical Exclusion Determination Project T-222 Hazardous Materials Management Emergency Response (HAMMER) Training Facility Water Main Extension for Fire Protection CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.15 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office March 1, 2011 CX-005366: Categorical Exclusion Determination Herbicide Applications Along Gravel and Paved Roads on the Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 31, 2011 CX-005190: Categorical Exclusion Determination Project L-691, 200 West Area Sanitary Sewage Lagoon CX(s) Applied: B1.26 Date: 01/31/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office

155

DOE Field Operations Program EV and HEV Testing  

SciTech Connect

The United States Department of Energys (DOE) Field Operations Program tests advanced technology vehicles (ATVs) and disseminates the testing results to provide fleet managers and other potential ATV users with accurate and unbiased information on vehicle performance. The ATVs (including electric, hybrid, and other alternative fuel vehicles) are tested using one or more methods - Baseline Performance Testing (EVAmerica and Pomona Loop), Accelerated Reliability Testing, and Fleet Testing. The Program (http://ev.inel.gov/sop) and its nine industry testing partners have tested over 30 full-size electric vehicle (EV) models and they have accumulated over 4 million miles of EV testing experience since 1994. In conjunction with several original equipment manufacturers, the Program has developed testing procedures for the new classes of hybrid, urban, and neighborhood EVs. The testing of these vehicles started during 2001. The EVS 18 presentation will include (1) EV and hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) test results, (2) operating experience with and performance trends of various EV and HEV models, and (3) experience with operating hydrogen-fueled vehicles. Data presented for EVs will include vehicle efficiency (km/kWh), average distance driven per charge, and range testing results. The HEV data will include operating considerations, fuel use rates, and range testing results.

Francfort, James Edward; Slezak, L. A.

2001-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

156

DOE_CX-00032_-_%5B1104270743%5D.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32 32 CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A DILUENTS/FLUSH SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED FACILITY, AND AN INSTRUMENTATION, CONTROL, AND ELECTRICAL FACILITY AT THE 241-AW AND 241-AY/AZ TANK FARMS, 200 EAST AREA, HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON Proposed Action The U.S. Department of Energy, (DOE) Office of River Protection (ORP) and the Richland Operations Office (RL) propose to construct and operate a DiluentslFlush system (DFS) and associated facility, as well as an Instrumentation, Control, and Electrical (ICE) facility at the 241-AW and 241-AY/AZ Tank Farms. Location of Action The work will take place within the 200 East Area, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Description of Proposed Action The 241-AW and 241-AY/AZ tank farms require the construction and subsequent operation of electrical

157

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

85 85 CHAPTER 4 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR MATERIAL CONDITION AND AGING MANAGEMENT This guidance is appropriate for high-hazard facilities expected to operate for an extended period. Since DOE facilities vary in hazard level and circumstances of operation, a graded approach to implementation should be adopted. As shown in Figure 4-1, Material Condition and Aging Management (MCA) activities are developed and implemented in three distinct phases: a preliminary phase, a detailed or main phase, and an ongoing phase. The preliminary MCA phase includes activities necessary to estimate the facility remaining lifetime and to develop the MCA program plan. The detailed MCA phase builds on the preliminary estimate of facility remaining lifetime with more rigorous evaluations of aging degradation mechanisms

158

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61 61 CHAPTER 3 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR DESIGN RECONSTITUTION This guidance is appropriate for high-hazard facilities expected to operate for an extended period. Since DOE facilities vary in hazard level and circumstances of operation, a graded approach to implementation should be adopted. The implementation guidance is presented in the general sequence in which the design reconstitution (DR) adjunct program is expected to be developed and implemented. Figure 3-1 presents the top- level flowchart for the DR adjunct program. 3.1 PROGRAM PLANS AND PROCEDURES 3.1.1 DESIGN RECONSTITUTION PROGRAM PLAN The DR program plan should address the topics defined in program criterion 1.3.1.1.c. It should be prepared in accordance with direction set forth by the program management element of the CM

159

Sensors Chapter of the IEEE Richland Section  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MEETING MEETING of the Sensors Chapter of the IEEE Richland Section Wednesday, 27 August 2008 Dr. Wassana Yantasee, PNNL presenting Next-generation metal analyzers based on nanomaterials for biomonitoring and environmental monitoring Abstract: Large numbers of industrial workers are regularly expose to toxic heavy metals like mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb), which are known to induce various diseases that are detrimental to human health. In order to monitor workers for multiple toxic metal exposures and to ensure that these exposures are below a threshold for inducing permanent damage to various organ systems, real-time, non-invasive tools for monitoring of workplace and workers for toxic metal exposure is highly desirable. The portable metal analyzers are also highly beneficial to environmental monitoring of these toxic metals (e.g., in surface water, ground water,

160

RL-721 Document ID Number: REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00081  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81 81 I. Project Title: 300 Area Electrical Service Project, Hanford Site,Richland, Washington II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions ·e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Currently, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) obtains electrical services on the 300 Area of the Hanford Site from the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office {DOE-RL), Mission Support Alliance (MSA} I and Washington Closure Hanford (WCH). PNNL, with concurrence from the Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) and DOE-RL, is proposing to obtain 300 Area electrical services from the City of Richland (COR). The proposed plan for establishing new 12.47 kV power service is to install overhead power

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

REMOTE OPERATION OF DOE-1 ON THE LAWRENCE BERKELEY LABORATORY CDC 7600, 6600 AND 6400 COMPUTERS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

4. Control deck for operating DOE-I. program will write ahourly data contained in a DOE-1 packed file. It puts twoxt. 6782 OperatIon 0 f DOE-Ion Remote e Ber 'k e 1 y

Authors, Various

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

162

DOE-HDBK-3012-2003; DOE Handbook Guide to Good Practices for Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-96 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) TEAM LEADER'S GUIDE U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 FOREWORD This Department of Energy handbook, Guide to Good Practices for Conducting Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Handbook, is approved for use by all DOE Components and their contractors. The guidance in this document is the distillation of the experience and lessons learned during numerous operational readiness reviews contributed by team leaders with a wide range of backgrounds. There are

163

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington file:///I|/Data%20Migration%20Task/EIS-0189-FEIS-Summary-1996.HTM[6/27/2011 11:21:59 AM] The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires Federal agencies to analyze the potential environmental impacts of their proposed actions to assist them in making informed decisions. A similar Washington State law, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), requires State agencies, including the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), to analyze environmental impacts before making decisions that could impact the environment. A major emphasis of both laws is to promote public awareness of these actions and provide opportunities for public involvement. Because NEPA and SEPA requirements are similar, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Ecology

164

SFCD Environmental Assessment for Future Development on the South Federal Campus, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment for Future Development on the South Federal Campus, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office Richland, Washington 99352 May 2013 DOE/EA-1958 U.S. Department of Energy DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment May 2013 DOE/EA-1958 U.S. Department of Energy DRAFT Summary The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is a multi-program U.S. Department of Energy- Office of Science (DOE-SC) national laboratory conducting research to meet DOE strategic objectives. To enable continued research support, DOE-SC is proposing to construct new facilities and infrastructure

165

SFCD Environmental Assessment for Future Development on the South Federal Campus, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment for Future Development in Proximity to the William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office Richland, Washington 99352 July 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1958 This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment July 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1958 Summary The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is a multi-program U.S. Department of Energy- Office of Science (DOE-SC) national laboratory conducting research to meet DOE strategic objectives. To enable continued research support, DOE-SC is proposing to construct new facilities and infrastructure

166

Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Appliances & Electronics Sealing Your Home Ventilation Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Water Heating Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Clothes Washers: $20 - $30 Refrigerators: $15 Freezers: $15 Water Heaters: $25 Duct Sealing: $400 Controls: $300 Air-source Heat Pumps: $500 - $1,000 Ductless Heat Pumps: $1,500 Geothermal Heat Pumps: $2,000 Insulation: $0.05 - $0.85 per sq ft Windows: $6 per sq ft Richland Energy Services (RES) provides a number of rebates encouraging

167

EA-0915: Waste Tank Safety Program Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to resolve waste tank safety issues at the Hanford Site near the City of Richland, Washington, and to reduce the risks associated with...

168

Richland Energy Services- Residential Energy Conservation & Solar Loan Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The City of Richland provides low-interest loans to encourageit residential customers to pursue equipment upgrades and home improvement measures that will increase the energy efficiency of their...

169

Best Estimate Radiation Flux Value-Added Procedure: Algorithm Operational Details and Explanations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 Best Estimate Radiation Flux Value-Added Procedure: Algorithm Operational Details and Explanations October 2002 Y. Shi and C. N. Long DOE, ARM, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Office of Health and Environmental Research Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Input Data ............................................................................................................................................... 1 3. Configuration Files.................................................................................................................................

170

DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 1, Conduct of Operations  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Order defines the requirements for establishing and implementing Conduct of Operations Programs at Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear ...

2010-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

171

Order Module--DOE Order 422.1, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

422.1, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS 422.1, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS Order Module--DOE Order 422.1, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS The general approach to implementing DOE O 422.1 is for contractors to develop, for DOE line management approval, documentation demonstrating implementation of the requirements in the contractor requirements document (CRD). DOE line management means the Federal officials such as Secretarial Officers and heads of field elements responsible for DOE facilities and operations. It is necessary to provide a conduct of operations matrix, which is a list of CRD requirements, citing the specific documentation that implements each item, or providing justification for each item that is not implemented. DOE line management must determine which facilities, other than hazard category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities, require implementation

172

DOE-STD-1075-94; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5-94 5-94 July 1994 DOE STANDARD STANDARD FOR DEVELOPING AND ISSUING DOE SAFETY GUIDES AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDES U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94018438 DOE-STD-1075-94 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) standard was prepared by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health with the assistance of James E. Konklin of

173

Microsoft Word - 2013 (05-22-13) DOE-ID Operations Summary-13...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

May 16, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period April 1 to May 16, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory,...

174

EA-0930: Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30: Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction 30: Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction Projects Office, Grand Junction, Colorado EA-0930: Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction Projects Office, Grand Junction, Colorado SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to expand and upgrade the U.S. Department of Energy's Grand Junction Projects Office facilities and operations in Grand Junction, Colorado. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD June 8, 1996 EA-0930: Finding of No Significant Impact Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction Projects Office, Grand Junction, Colorado June 8, 1996 EA-0930: Final Environmental Assessment Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction Projects Office, Grand

175

DOE G 430.1-1 Chp 9, Operating Costs  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This chapter is focused on capital costs for conventional construction and environmental restoration and waste management projects and examines operating cost ...

1997-03-28T23:59:59.000Z

176

DOE Names Interim Manager for Idaho Operations Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Interim Manager for Idaho Operations Office Dennis Miotla, the Office of Nuclear Energy's Deputy Assistant Secretary Dennis Miotla for Nuclear Power Deployment, has been named the...

177

Approved: 6-29-2010, Conduct of Operations, DOE O 422.1 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Approved: 6-29-2010, Conduct of Operations, DOE O 422.1 Approved: 6-29-2010, Conduct of Operations, DOE O 422.1 Approved: 6-29-2010, Conduct of Operations, DOE O 422.1 1. PURPOSE. The objective of this Order is to define the requirements for establishing and implementing Conduct of Operations Programs at Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), facilities and projects. A Conduct of Operations Program consists of formal documentation, practices, and actions implementing disciplined and structured operations that support mission success and promote worker, public, and environmental protection. The goal is to minimize the likelihood and consequences of human fallibility or technical and organizational system failures. Conduct of Operations is one of the safety management programs recognized in the Nuclear Safety Rule [Title 10

178

Microsoft Word - DOE-CX-00013 Biological Sampling at WMA C Signed.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 1 CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION FOR SMALL MAMMAL SAMPLING NEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT AREA C, 200 EAST AREA, HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON Proposed Action The U.S. Department of Energy, (DOE) Office of River Protection (ORP) and the Richland Operations Office (RL) propose to conduct trapping and sampling of small mammals near Waste Management Area C (WMA C), in FY 2011. Location of Action The work will take place near and around the perimeter of WMA C, located within the 200 East Area, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Description of Proposed Action The proposed action, small mammal live trapping and sampling, will be performed near and around the perimeter of WMA C as part of a screening level ecological risk assessment for WMA C. The primary small mammal species targeted for collection in the study include

179

DOE Idaho Operations Office Manager Elizabeth Sellers leaving...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for Elizabeth Sellers, who is retiring as manager of the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Operations Office. The gathering is open to the public, and is scheduled for Jan. 22...

180

DOE/EIS-0222-SA-O1 Supplement Analysis Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22-SA-O1 22-SA-O1 Supplement Analysis Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 June 2008 DOE/EIS-0222-SA-0 1 SUMMARY In September 1999 the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued the Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan (HCP) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) (DOE/EIS-0222-F). The HCP EIS analyzed the impacts of alternatives for implementing a land-use plan for the DOE's Hanford Site for at least the next 50-year planning period and lasting for as long as DOE retains legal control of some portion of the real estate. In November 1999 DOE issued its Record of Decision (ROD), establishing the Comprehensive Land-Use Plan (CLUP), which consisted of four key elements:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WR-FS-97-04 More Documents & Publications Report on Matters Identified at the Rocky Flats Field Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996...

182

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Position (as of September 30, 1995), IG-FS-96-01 Report on Matters Identified at the Rocky Flats Field Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996...

183

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory July 3, 2008 - 2:15pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued its Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of a contractor to manage and operate Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), a DOE Office of Science research facility in Princeton, NJ. PPPL receives approximately $78 million annually from DOE. This is the first competition for a contractor in the history of the laboratory. The RFP describes the criteria DOE will use in selecting a successful future management and operating (M&O) contractor. Key criteria include:

184

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

II-A-1 II-A-1 DOE-STD-1073-93 APPENDIX lI-A DESIGN CONTROL Design controls are the measures established to assure that the design process activities are carried out in a planned, orderly, correct, and documented manner. These controls assure the quality of the design requirements and design basis obtained through the design process. Design controls are constraints to the design process that ensure the following results: the correct identification of design inputs and constraints; the design analysis and calculations are complete and correct; and the design outputs are complete and consistent with the design basis. Design controls are implemented through procedures. DOE 5700.6C, Quality Assurance, defines DOE design control requirements. ANSI/ASME NQA-1, Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants, provides additional guidance on design

185

Microsoft Word - DOE_EA-1454.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F, 100-H, and 100-N Areas U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 March 2003 DOE/EA-1454 Rev. 0 EA for Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F, 100-H, and 100-N Areas March 2003 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION ................................................... 1-1 2.0 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 2-1 3.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ....................................................... 3-1 3.1 PROPOSED ACTION ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ..........................................

186

Richland Energy Services - Energy Efficient Commercial Lighting Program |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Energy Services - Energy Efficient Commercial Lighting Richland Energy Services - Energy Efficient Commercial Lighting Program Richland Energy Services - Energy Efficient Commercial Lighting Program < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Industrial Institutional Nonprofit Savings Category Other Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Maximum Rebate 70% of the total cost Program Info Expiration Date 9/30/2012 State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount T5/T8 with Electric Ballasts: $10 - $65 Hardwired CFL's: $40 - $80 Screw In CFL's: $3 - $12 Cold Cathode: $3 - $15 Ceramic Metal Halide Fixture: $30 - $50 LED's: $15 - $50 Induction: $80 - $400 High-output T5/T8: $50 - $180 Metal Halide/High Pressure Sodium: $80 - $400 Stairwell/Garage Fluorescent Fixture: $50 Occupancy Sensor/Timer: $30 - $60

187

Town of Richlands, Virginia (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Richlands, Virginia (Utility Company) Richlands, Virginia (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name Town of Richlands Place Virginia Utility Id 15982 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location RFC NERC RFC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Schedule L.G.S. (Large General Electric Service) Industrial Schedule M.G.S. (Medium General Services) Commercial Schedule O.L. (Outdoor Lighting) 100 watt (shared) H.P Sodium Lighting Schedule O.L. (Outdoor Lighting) 100 watt H.P. Sodium Lighting Schedule O.L. (Outdoor Lighting) 100 watt HPS Post Top Lighting

188

Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Conservation and Solar Loan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Conservation and Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Conservation and Solar Loan Program Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Conservation and Solar Loan Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Sealing Your Home Appliances & Electronics Design & Remodeling Windows, Doors, & Skylights Ventilation Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Water Heating Solar Buying & Making Electricity Maximum Rebate $15,000 Equipment Specific Maximums Heat Pump: $10,000 Ductwork: $1,500 Clothes washer $1,500 Refrigerator $3,000 Freezer $800 Electric water heater $700 Solar water heater $4,000 Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Loan Program Rebate Amount up to $15,000

189

Kansas State University (KSU), DOE EV Site Operator Program  

SciTech Connect

Kansas State University, with funding support from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the Department of Energy's Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Through participation in this program, Kansas State is demonstrating, testing, and evaluating electric or hybrid vehicle technology. This participation will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU proposes to purchase one (1) electric or hybrid van and four (4) electric cars during the first two years of this five-year program. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has initiated a procurement order to purchase two (2) Soleq 1992 Ford EVcort station wagons. The G-Van has been signed in order for the public to be aware that this is an electric drive vehicle. Financial participant's names have been stenciled on the back door of the van. This vehicle is available for short term loan to interested utilities and companies. When other vehicles are obtained, the G-Van will be maintained on K-State's campus.

Hague, J.R.

1992-11-17T23:59:59.000Z

190

Kansas State University (KSU), DOE EV Site Operator Program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Kansas State University, with funding support from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the Department of Energy's Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Through participation in this program, Kansas State is demonstrating, testing, and evaluating electric or hybrid vehicle technology. This participation will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU proposes to purchase one (1) electric or hybrid van and four (4) electric cars during the first two years of this five-year program. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has initiated a procurement order to purchase two (2) Soleq 1992 Ford EVcort station wagons. The G-Van has been signed in order for the public to be aware that this is an electric drive vehicle. Financial participant's names have been stenciled on the back door of the van. This vehicle is available for short term loan to interested utilities and companies. When other vehicles are obtained, the G-Van will be maintained on K-State's campus.

Hague, J.R.

1992-11-17T23:59:59.000Z

191

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $800 million per year and is for a five-year base period with the option to extend it for up to five additional years. SRNS is a limited liability corporation consisting of Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., and Newport News

192

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory July 10, 2006 - 2:57pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the issuance of a final Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of an approximately $1.58 billion, five-year management and operating contract for Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). Fermilab is a major DOE Office of Science single program research facility located on 6,800 acres approximately 45 miles west of Chicago, Illinois. "Fermilab is a world leader in high energy physics, which helps the U.S.

193

DOE-HDBK-3012-96; Team Leader's Preparation Guide for Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INCH-POUND INCH-POUND DOE-HDBK-3012-96 June 1996 SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-94 September 1994 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) TEAM LEADER'S GUIDE U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009471 DOE-HDBK-3012-96 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy handbook, Guide to Good Practices for Conducting Operational

194

DOE/EIS-0222 Revised Draft Hanford Remedial Action Environmental Impact Statement and Comprehensive Land-Use Plan, April 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Draft Executive Summary Cover Sheet 1 2 3 Lead Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 4 5 Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Department of the Interior (Bureau of Land Management, 6 Bureau of Reclamation, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service); Benton, Franklin, and Grant 7 counties; and the City of Richland 8 9 Consulting Tribal Governments: Nez Perce Tribe Department of Environmental Restoration 10 and Waste Management and the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation 11 12 Title: Revised Draft Hanford Remedial Action Environmental Impact Statement and 13 Comprehensive Land-Use Plan (HRA-EIS), Hanford Site, Richland, Washington 14 15 Contacts: For further information on this EIS call or contact: 16 17 Thomas W. Ferns, HRA-EIS Document Manager 18 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office

195

DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground August 15, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Deb Gill www.wipp.energy.gov 575-234-7270 CARLSBAD, N.M. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced that disposal operations in Panel 5 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) underground repository are complete. Last month, the final contact-handled transuranic (CH-TRU) waste shipment was emplaced in the panel, which took just over two years to fill. "All TRU waste management employees at WIPP and at the generator sites deserve the credit for this accomplishment," National TRU Program Director J.R. Stroble said. "It is through their dedication to performing

196

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For June 19 to July 12, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

July 12, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

197

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 26 to June 14, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

June 14, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

198

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 17 to June 6, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

June 6, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

199

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 25 to May 14, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

May 14, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

200

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For July 21 to Aug. 3, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Aug. 3, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For December 27, 2011 to January...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

23, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

202

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For November 29 to December 26,...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

26, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

203

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For September 10 to October 1, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oct. 1, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

204

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For December 20 to January 10, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

205

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For August 3 to August 21, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Aug. 21, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

206

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For August 24 to September 12, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

12, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

207

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Nov. 10 to Nov. 23, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nov. 23, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

208

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For October 2 to October 22, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oct. 22, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

209

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For July 20 to August 2, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

August 2, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

210

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 6 to May 24, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

May 24, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

211

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Nov. 24 to Dec. 8, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dec. 8, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

212

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For November 8 to November 28, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

28, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

213

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For February 15 to March 7, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

March 7, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

214

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For July 7 to July 20, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

July 20, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

215

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For August 22 to September 10, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sept. 10, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

216

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 28 to May 11, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

May 11, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

217

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Jan. 5 to Jan. 18, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Jan. 18, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

218

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For January 24, 2012 to February...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

219

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For July 19 to August 8, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

August 8, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

220

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 11 to April 25, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

April 25, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For June 28 to July 18, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

July 18, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

222

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Dec. 9 to Dec. 21, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dec. 21, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

223

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 20 to May 5, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to May 5, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

224

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 26 to May 16, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

May 16, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

225

Resources | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Resources Resources Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 Resources Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Contact: Pacific Northwest Site Office P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 (509) 372-4005 Public Affairs: Larry Moore (509) 372-4365 Email: larry.moore@pnso.science.doe.gov Links: DOE-Battelle Prime Contract for the Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory External link U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Pacific Northwest National Laboratory External link Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory External link

226

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Los Alamos Postdoc Program Office  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Los Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA The Los Alamos Postdoc

227

DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II: Response to Public Comments (January 2 DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II: Response to Public Comments (January 2 DOE issued the Draft SEIS for public review and comment by mailings to stakeholders and by announcements in the Federal Register (FR) on November 5, 1999, (64 FR 60430) (Attachment 4 of Volume I) and on November 12, 1999 (64 FR 61635) correcting a document title (Attachment 5 of Volume I). On

228

About | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

About About Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (600KB) Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 About Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Located in Richland, Washington, the Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) provides programmatic, operational, and institutional stewardship and oversight of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in support of the Department's science and technology programs, goals, and objectives. We oversee the current DOE-Battelle Prime Contract for the Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory with our goal being to

229

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Los Alamos Postdoc Program Office  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Los / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA provide you with an invoice before we receive Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Los Alamos Postdoc Career

230

DOE Selects ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy Laboratory DOE Selects ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy Laboratory July 29, 2008 - 2:40pm Addthis WASHINGTON - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the Alliance for Sustainable Energy (ASE) LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Golden, Colorado. The cost-plus award-fee contract is valued at approximately $1.1 billion, subject to annual appropriations, over a five-year contract period. The contract includes an option to extend it for up to five additional years. "While there is certainly no 'silver bullet' that will solve the world's energy problems, we know that renewable energy and efficiency technologies

231

HANFORD SITE SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAM RICHLAND WASHINGTON - 12464  

SciTech Connect

In support of implementation of Executive Order (EO) 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance, the Hanford Site Sustainability Plan was developed to implement strategies and activities required to achieve the prescribed goals in the EO as well as demonstrate measurable progress in environmental stewardship at the Hanford Site. The Hanford Site Sustainability Program was developed to demonstrate progress towards sustainability goals as defined and established in Executive Order (EO) 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance; EO 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy and Transportation Management, and several applicable Energy Acts. Multiple initiatives were undertaken in Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 to implement the Program and poise the Hanford Site as a leader in environmental stewardship. In order to implement the Hanford Site Sustainability Program, a Sustainability Plan was developed in conjunction with prime contractors, two U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Offices, and key stakeholders to serve as the framework for measuring progress towards sustainability goals. Based on the review of these metrics and future plans, several activities were initiated to proactively improve performance or provide alternatives for future consideration contingent on available funding. A review of the key metric associated with energy consumption for the Hanford Site in FY 2010 and 2011 indicated an increase over the target reduction of 3 percent annually from a baseline established in FY 2003 as illustrated in Figure 1. This slight increase was attributed primarily from the increased energy demand from the cleanup projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in FY 2010 and 2011. Although it is forecasted that the energy demand will decrease commensurate with the completion of ARRA projects, several major initiatives were launched to improve energy efficiency.

FRITZ LL

2012-01-12T23:59:59.000Z

232

DOE-STD-1043-93 CN-1; Guide to Good Practices for Operator Aid Postings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-93 3-93 June 1993 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATOR AID POSTINGS U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No. 1 DOE-STD-1043-93 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Operator Aid Postings Page / Section Change Concluding Material

233

DOE-STD-1034-93; Guide to Good Practices for Timely Orders to Operators  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-93 4-93 March 1993 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TIMELY ORDERS TO OPERATORS U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No. 1 DOE-STD-1034-93 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Timely Orders to Operators Page / Section Change p. 10 / Section 4.3

234

DOE-STD-1038-93; Guide to Good Practices for Operations Turnover  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8-93 8-93 June 1993 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONS TURNOVER U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No.1 DOE-STD-1038-93 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Operations Turnover Page/Section Change Concluding Material The Preparing Activity was changed from NE-

235

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Argonne National Laboratory April 19, 2006 - 10:23am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the issuance of a final Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of an approximated $2.54 billion, five-year management and operating contract for Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), a DOE Office of Science multi-program research facility located near Chicago, Illinois. "Argonne lab contributes expert scientists and unique leadership in basic research, which helps the U.S. maintain our global competitiveness," said Office of Science Director, Dr. Raymond L. Orbach. "Through this contracting process, DOE seeks the best possible management of this

236

DOE-STD-1037-93; Guide to Good Practices for Operations Aspects of Unique Processes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7-93 7-93 June 1993 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONS ASPECTS OF UNIQUE PROCESSES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No. 1 DOE-STD-1037-93 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Operations Aspects of Unique Processes Page / Section

237

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $800 million per year and is for a five-year base period with the option to extend it for up to five additional years. SRNS is a limited liability corporation consisting of Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., and Newport News

238

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective July 2, 2012 - 3:03pm Addthis Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Former Associate Deputy Secretary

239

DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate WIPP DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate WIPP January 18, 2005 - 9:55am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that it has decided to exercise the five year option in the Washington TRU Solutions LLC ("WTS") contract to continue managing and operating the Department's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), located in New Mexico. The option DOE exercised is a part of the WIPP contract that was competitively procured in 2000. The WTS contract will now run through September 30, 2010 with an estimated value over the five year timeframe of approximately $704 million. "We are very pleased to take this step," said Kyle McSlarrow, Deputy

240

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

its Ames Laboratory its Ames Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Ames Laboratory June 29, 2006 - 2:48pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued its Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of a management and operating (M&O) contractor to operate Ames Laboratory, a DOE Office of Science (SC) research facility in Ames, Iowa. This competition for a contractor is the first in the history of the laboratory. Ames is a laboratory that has been funded at approximately $30 million annually by the Office of Science, other government agencies, and private industry. "Ames Laboratory provides leadership in basic research across a broad spectrum of science, with great expertise in biology, chemistry, physics

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Deputy Director for Field Operations Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Deputy Director for Field Operations Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Oversight Operations Improvement Committee Contact Information Deputy Director for Field Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-3/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5434 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page The DOE laboratory system is the most comprehensive research system of its kind in the world, and constitutes a critical strategic scientific and technical resource. The Office of Science has responsibility for 10 of the 17 DOE laboratories, helping to ensure they deliver exceptional scientific productivity benefiting the taxpayer. Each laboratory is

242

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective July 2, 2012 - 3:03pm Addthis Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Former Associate Deputy Secretary

243

DOE KSU EV Site Operator Program. [United States Department of Energy (DOE) Kansas State University (KSU) Electric Vehicle (EV)  

SciTech Connect

Kansas State University, with funding from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the DOE Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Kansas State is demonstrating, testing, and evaluating electric of hybrid vehicle technology. This will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU proposes to purchase one (1) electric or hybrid van and four(4) electric cars during the first two years of this five-year program. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has initiated a procurement order to purchase two (2) Soleq 1992 Ford EVcort station wagons. This quarter's report describes ongoing public relations activities and meetings as well as presenting performance data for the electric vehicles. (GHH)

Hague, J.R.; Steinert, R.A.; Nissen-Pfrang, T.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

244

DOE KSU EV Site Operator Program. [United States Department of Energy (DOE) Kansas State University (KSU) Electric Vehicle (EV)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Kansas State University, with funding from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the DOE Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Kansas State is demonstrating, testing, and evaluating electric of hybrid vehicle technology. This will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU proposes to purchase one (1) electric or hybrid van and four(4) electric cars during the first two years of this five-year program. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has initiated a procurement order to purchase two (2) Soleq 1992 Ford EVcort station wagons. This quarter's report describes ongoing public relations activities and meetings as well as presenting performance data for the electric vehicles. (GHH)

Hague, J.R.; Steinert, R.A.; Nissen-Pfrang, T.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

Operational Awareness Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project, April 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HIAR-RL-2011-04-07 HIAR-RL-2011-04-07 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Sludge Treatment Project Dates of Activity : 11/17/2010 - 04/07/2011 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Result: On November 17, 2010, a HSS representative participated in a tour of the STP test facility. The HSS representative was also briefed by the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) Project Engineer, the CHPRC STP Design

246

Field Operations Organization | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Field Operations Organization Field Operations Organization Deputy Director for Field Operations Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Organization Chart .pdf file (77KB) Field Offices Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) Oversight Operations Improvement Committee Contact Information Deputy Director for Field Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-3/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5434 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov Field Operations Organization Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Field Operations is led by Deputy Director Joseph McBrearty and consists of three major elements - Site Offices, a Support Center, and Headquarters

247

DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground August 15, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Deb Gill www.wipp.energy.gov 575-234-7270 CARLSBAD, N.M. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced that disposal operations in Panel 5 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) underground repository are complete. Last month, the final contact-handled transuranic (CH-TRU) waste shipment was emplaced in the panel, which took just over two years to fill. "All TRU waste management employees at WIPP and at the generator sites deserve the credit for this accomplishment," National TRU Program Director J.R. Stroble said. "It is through their dedication to performing their jobs safely, compliantly and timely that WIPP and the TRU Waste

248

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory July 10, 2006 - 2:57pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the issuance of a final Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of an approximately $1.58 billion, five-year management and operating contract for Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). Fermilab is a major DOE Office of Science single program research facility located on 6,800 acres approximately 45 miles west of Chicago, Illinois. "Fermilab is a world leader in high energy physics, which helps the U.S. maintain global competitiveness," said Under Secretary for Science, Dr.

249

DOE/EIS0247; Final Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SNS FEIS SNS FEIS Cover Sheet COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source (DOE/EIS-0247) LOCATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE SITES: Illinois, New Mexico, New York, and Tennessee. CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. David Wilfert, EIS Document Manager Oak Ridge Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road, 146/FEDC Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone: (800) 927-9964 Facsimile: (423) 576-4542 E-mail: NSNSEIS@ornl.gov Mr. Jeff Hoy, SNS Program Manager Office of Basic Energy Research U.S. Department of Energy (ER-10) Germantown, MD 20874 Telephone: (301) 903-4924 Facsimile: (301) 903-9513 E-mail: Jeff.Hoy@mailgw.er.doe.gov

250

DOE-HDBK-5504-95; Guidance for Evaluation of Operational Emergency Plans  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5504-95 5504-95 March 1995 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDANCE FOR EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL EMERGENCY PLANS U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE95012002 DOE-HDBK-5504-95 iii FOREWORD This handbook incorporates emergency planning information from the following EPA and OSHA regulations:

251

Operations Improvement Committee | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Operations Improvement Committee Operations Improvement Committee Deputy Director for Field Operations Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Oversight Operations Improvement Committee Contact Information Deputy Director for Field Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-3/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5434 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov Operations Improvement Committee Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science (SC)-the lead federal agency supporting fundamental scientific research for energy and the Nation's largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences-has two principal thrusts: direct support of scientific research and direct

252

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Bradbury Science Museum  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Bradbury Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA The historical museum in town (http

253

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Los Alamos Postdoc Program Office  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA 2) The catering company (or appropriate goods/service provider

254

2002 DOE/DNFSB Interface Workshop - Participants  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE/DNFSB Interface Workshop DOE/DNFSB Interface Workshop PARTICIPANTS Amerine, Dave CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Hanford P. O. Box 1500 MSIN: H6-63 Richland, WA 99352 509-376-5107 509-372-1664 (Fax) David_B_Amerine@rl.gov Bailey, Nolan Board Point of Conact, Nevada Operations Office 232 Energy Way North Las Vegas, NA 89030 702-295-4601 702-295-2261 (Fax) bailey@nv.doe.gov Bartlett, William Carlsbad Technical Assistance Contractor, WIPP 4021 National Parks Hwy Carlsbad, NM 88220 505-234-7160 505-234-7198 (Fax) bill.bartlett@wipp.ws Beck, Dave NNSA Assistant Deputy Administrator for Military Application and Stockpile Operations, NA-12 1000 Independence Ave Washington, DC 20585 202-586-4879 Black, Dick Director, EH Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy, EH-53 1000 Independence Ave

255

DOEEA-1178 Assessment 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Assessment 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. March 1997 , DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liabili- ty or mponsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, appa- ratus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or s e m ' c e by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or

256

CERCLA Preliminary Assessment of DOE'S Nevada Operations Office Nuclear Weapons Testing  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

tudies/B ackground tudies/B ackground Book 1 CERCLA Preliminary Assessment of DOE'S Nevada Operations Office Nuclear Weapons Testing Areas Vol. 11, April 1988 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. CERCLA PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF DOE'S NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE WCILEAR WEAPONS T E S r n G AREAS Prepared by Water Resources Center Desert Research Institute University of Nevada System ,Prepared for U . S . Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada under contract DE-AC08-85NV10384 A p r i l 1988 CONTENTS VOLUME I I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 11. NEVADA TEST SITE TESTING AREAS 2.1 Frenchman Flat (Area 5) 2.1.1 2.2 Yucca Flat (Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 15)

257

DOE Nevada Operations Office Environmental Protection Implementation Plan, November 9, 1993--November 9, 1994  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

DOE Order 5400.1, ``General Environmental Protection Program,`` established environmental protection program requirements, authorities, and responsibilities to assure that the Department of Energy (DOE) operations are in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal department policies. Chapter III of DOE Order 5400.1 required that each field organization prepare a plan for implementing the requirements of this order by no later than November 9, 1989, and update the plan annually. Therefore, the Department of Energy/Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) has prepared this fourth annual update of its Environmental Protection Implementation Plan (EPIP). The Order and corresponding guidances also require estimated budgetary resources necessary for implementation of the Order be identified in the Environmental Protection Implementation Plan. To satisfy this requirement, the estimated costs to effectuate necessary changes in existing programs or processes and to institute new programs or processes for compliance with the Order are provided in the following sections of this plan. The DOE/NV Assistant Manager for Environment, Safety, Security, & Health (AMESSH), in consultation with other organizations responsible for line management of plan implementation, is responsible for annual plan revisions.

Elle, D.R. [USDOE Nevada Operations Office, Las Vegas, NV (United States); Townsend, Y.E. [ed.; Latham, A.R.; Black, S.C. [Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Co., Inc., Las Vegas, NV (United States)

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

Business Policy and Operations Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Organization » BPO Home Organization » BPO Home Business Policy and Operations (BPO) BPO Home Leadership Organization Chart .pdf file (195KB) Business Management and Planning (BMP) Division SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Contact Information Business Policy & Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-45/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-0192 F: (301) 903-2481 More Information » Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page The Office of Business Policy and Operations (BPO) is the provider of information technology and information resource services for systems supporting the DOE Office of Science (SC) Headquarters. We are a focused group committed to implementing the organization's strategic and operating plans, and helping our customers accelerate business innovation through

259

DOE O 137.1B, Plan for Operating in the Event of a Lapse in Appropriations  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order established plans and procedures for continuing operations during a lapse in appropriations. Cancels DOE O 137.1A

2011-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

260

DOE Considers Natural Gas Utility Service Options: Proposal Includes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Considers Natural Gas Utility Service Options: Proposal Considers Natural Gas Utility Service Options: Proposal Includes 30-mile Natural Gas Pipeline from Pasco to Hanford DOE Considers Natural Gas Utility Service Options: Proposal Includes 30-mile Natural Gas Pipeline from Pasco to Hanford January 23, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Cameron Hardy, DOE , (509) 376-5365, Cameron.Hardy@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is considering natural gas transportation and distribution requirements to support the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) and evaporator operations at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. DOE awarded a task order worth up to $5 million to the local, licensed supplier of natural gas in the Hanford area, Cascade Natural Gas Corporation (Cascade). Cascade will support DOE and its Environmental

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Microsoft Word - CX-BadgerCanyon-RichlandNo1_WoodPoles_FY13.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2013 7, 2013 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR/Pasco SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Walker Miller Electrical Engineer - TPCF-W RICHLAND Proposed Action: Wood pole replacements on the Badger Canyon-Richland #1 transmission line PP&A Project No.: 2670 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.3 Routine maintenance activities. Location: City of Richland, Benton County, WA Transmission Line/ROW Structure # Township Range Section County, State Badger Canyon-Richland #1 4/9 and 4/10 9N 28E 26 Benton, WA Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: BPA, at the expense of the City of Richland, proposes to raise structures 4/9 and 4/10 of the Badger Canyon-Richland #1 115-kilovolt transmission line to

262

US Department of Energy DOE Nevada Operations Office, Nevada Test Site: Underground safety and health standards  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Nevada Test Site Underground Safety and Health Standards Working Group was formed at the direction of John D. Stewart, Director, Nevada Test Site Office in April, 1990. The objective of the Working Group was to compile a safety and health standard from the California Tunnel Safety Orders and OSHA for the underground operations at the NTS, (excluding Yucca Mountain). These standards are called the NTS U/G Safety and Health Standards. The Working Group submits these standards as a RECOMMENDATION to the Director, NTSO. Although the Working Group considers these standards to be the most integrated and comprehensive standards that could be developed for NTS Underground Operations, the intent is not to supersede or replace any relevant DOE orders. Rather the intent is to collate the multiple safety and health references contained in DOE Order 5480.4 that have applicability to NTS Underground Operations into a single safety and heath standard to be used in the underground operations at the NTS. Each portion of the standard was included only after careful consideration by the Working Group and is judged to be both effective and appropriate. The specific methods and rationale used by the Working Group are outlined as follows: The letter from DOE/HQ, dated September 28, 1990 cited OSHA and the CTSO as the safety and health codes applicable to underground operations at the NTS. These mandated codes were each originally developed to be comprehensive, i.e., all underground operations of a particular type (e.g., tunnels in the case of the CTSO) were intended to be adequately regulated by the appropriate code. However, this is not true; the Working Group found extensive and confusing overlap in the codes in numerous areas. Other subjects and activities were addressed by the various codes in cursory fashion or not at all.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

263

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For November 15 to December 1, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

15 to December 1, 2010 15 to December 1, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary

264

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Sept. 29 to Oct. 12, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

29 to Oct. 12, 2009 29 to Oct. 12, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project No incidents to report. Operational Summary

265

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For September 12 to September 26, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 to September 26, 2011 2 to September 26, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary

266

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 25 to June 14, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 to June 14, 2010 5 to June 14, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project No incidents to report. Operational Summary

267

Safeguards and Nuclear Materials Management: A view from the DOE Chicago Operations Office  

SciTech Connect

Nuclear Materials Safeguards (also known as Material Control and Accountability or MC&A) and Nuclear Materials Management as practiced within the US Department of Energy (DOE) are separate, but related disciplines with differing goals and objectives. Safeguards and Nuclear Materials Management are closely related through the common use of transaction and inventory reporting data from the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System (NMMSS). Adherence to Nuclear Materials management principals may enhance Nuclear Materials Safeguards, and has the potential to result in savings for both program and safeguards costs. Both the Safeguards and Nuclear Materials Management Programs for the Chicago Operations Office are administered by the Safeguards and Security Division, Safeguards Branch. This paper discusses Safeguards and Materials Management issues within the Chicago Operations Office, some of which relate to problems faced by the DOE complex as a whole.

Healy, F.E.; Ahlberg, C.G.

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

DOE handbook: Guide to good practices for training and qualification of chemical operators  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Handbook is to provide contractor training organizations with information that can be used as a reference to refine existing chemical operator training programs, or develop new training programs where no program exists. This guide, used in conjunction with facility-specific job analyses, will provide a framework for training and qualification programs for chemical operators at DOE reactor and nonreactor facilities. Recommendations for qualification are made in four areas: education, experience, physical attributes, and training. Contents include: initial qualification; administrative training; industrial safety training; specialized skills training; on-the-job training; trainee evaluation; continuing training; training effectiveness evaluation; and program records. Two appendices describe Fundamentals training and Process operations. This handbook covers chemical operators in transportation of fuels and wastes, spent fuel receiving and storage, fuel disassembly, fuel reprocessing, and both liquid and solid low-level waste processing.

NONE

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

Site Environmental Report for Calendar Year 1999. DOE Operations at The Boeing Company, Rocketdyne  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

OAK A271 Site Environmental Report for Calendar Year 1999. DOE Operations at The Boeing Company, Rocketdyne. This Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER) for 1999 describes the environmental conditions related to work performed for the Department of Energy (DOE) at Area IV of the Rocketdyne Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). In the past, these operations included development, fabrication, and disassembly of nuclear reactors, reactor fuel, and other radioactive materials under the former Atomics International Division. Other activities included the operation of large-scale liquid metal facilities for testing of liquid metal fast breeder components at the Energy Technology Engineering Center (ETEC), a government-owned, company-operated test facility within Area IV. All nuclear work was terminated in 1988, and subsequently, all radiological work has been directed toward decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) of the previously used nuclear facilities and associated site areas. Large-scale D&D activities of the sodium test facilities began in 1996. This Annual Site Environmental Report provides information showing that there are no indications of any potential impact on public health and safety due to the operations conducted at the SSFL. All measures and calculations of off-site conditions demonstrate compliance with applicable regulations, which provide for protection of human health and the environment.

None

2000-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

`OFFICIAL USE ONLY' An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for DOE/NNSA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

for DOE/NNSA Los Alamos National Laboratory Principal Investigator Questionnaire 1. External Partner, LLC for DOE/NNSA 5. Rights and Inventions Yes No 1. Will any patentable processes (LANL inventions;`OFFICIAL USE ONLY' An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for DOE/NNSA

271

Site Environmental Report for calendar year 1998, DOE operations at Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power  

SciTech Connect

This Annual Site Environmental Report for 1998 describes the environmental conditions related to work performed for the Department of Energy (DOE) at Area IV of the Rocketdyne Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) and De Soto facilities. In the past, these operations included development, fabrication, and disassembly of nuclear reactors, reactor fuel, and other radioactive materials, under the Atomics International (AI) Division. Other activities included the operation of large-scale liquid metal facilities for testing of liquid metal fast breeder components at the Energy Technology Engineering Center (ETEC), a government-owned company-operated, test facility within Area IV. AI was merged into Rocketdyne in 1984 and many of the AI functions were transferred to existing Rocketdyne departments. All nuclear work was terminated in 1988, and subsequently, all radiological work has been directed toward decontamination and decommissioning (D and D) of the previously used nuclear facilities and associated site areas. Large-scale D and D activities of the sodium test facilities began in 1996. Results of the radiological monitoring program for the calendar year of 1998 continue to indicate that there are no significant releases of radioactive material from Rocketdyne sites. All potential exposure pathways are sampled and/or monitored, including air, soil, surface water, groundwater, and direct radiation. All radioactive wastes are processed for disposal at DOE disposal sites and other sites approved by DOE and licensed for radioactive waste. Liquid radioactive wastes are not released into the environment and do not constitute an exposure pathway.

Rutherford, P.D. [ed.] [ed.

1999-09-22T23:59:59.000Z

272

DOE/EA-0767 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF AN INDUSTRIAL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

767 767 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF AN INDUSTRIAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL AT PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT PIKETON, OHIO OCTOBER 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE MAST ~P . L...~ I OOTRlSUTiON· O F THIS OOCl,lJlOO IS lIUi&fJtID Ct( OSTI Environmental Assessment Construction and Operation of an Industrial Solid Waste Landfill at Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Piketon. Ohio October 1995 Prepared by LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS. INC. Environmental Management and Enrichment Facilities P. O. Box 628 Piketon. Ohio 45661 for the U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Under Contract DE-AC05-840R21400 DOE/EA-0767 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES AND TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

273

City of Richland Center, Wisconsin (Utility Company) | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wisconsin (Utility Company) Wisconsin (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name City of Richland Center Place Wisconsin Utility Id 15978 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location MRO NERC MRO Yes ISO MISO Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Cp-1 Small Power Service Industrial Cp-1 Small Power Service Primary Metering Discount with Parallel Generation(20kW or less) Industrial Cp-1 Small Power Service Primary Metering and Transformer Ownership Discount Industrial Cp-1 Small Power Service Primary Metering and Transformer Ownership Discount with Parallel Generation(20kW or less) Industrial

274

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For March 28 to April 24, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

28 to April 24, 2012 28 to April 24, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Waste retrieval resumes at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project

275

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - DOE-SR News  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Release Archive Release Archive DOE-SR News Release Archive 2012 News Releases Savannah River Site Reaches Significant Milestone with Waste Tank Closure SR-2012-06 Adobe Acrobat PDF DOE to Extend Savannah River Nuclear Solutions Contract at Savannah River Site to September 2016 SR-2012-05 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Site Federal Employees Volunteer for United Way Campaign SR-2012-04 Adobe Acrobat PDF Installation of Six Large Process Tanks Mark Big Step in Construction of Critical Waste Cleanup Facility at SRS SR-2012-03 Adobe Acrobat PDF Grouting Begins on First SRS Waste Tanks Since 1997 SR-2012-02 Adobe Acrobat PDF SRS Marks Successful Operational Startup of New Biomass Cogeneration Facility SR-2012-01 Adobe Acrobat PDF 2011 News Releases Recovery Act Funds Test Reactor Dome Removal in Historic D&D Project

276

March 30, 2010, Face to Face Meeting Presentation - DOE FTCP FY10 Operational Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Federal Technical Capability Panel DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel FY10 Operational Plan G l 1 Obj ti 2 Goal 1 Objective 2: Define and implement a standard approach for continuing technical training for personnel in the continuing technical training for personnel in the TQP March 2010 Mark Sundie and Carol Ingram, Co-champions g , p Objectives for Today Goal 1 Objective 2 Goals for Face-to-Face: Goal 1 Objective 2 Goals for Face to Face: Obtain approval of revised wording Obtain approval of revised wording * Obtain FTCP input and buy-in on path forward: forward: Brief Panel on Status of Objective 2 Ensure that outcomes support DOE long-term mission pp g needs and provide management flexibility in TQP implementation G1 O2 Summary Face to Face Mar2010 FINAL Carol Ingram, NNSA/LSO

277

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Feb. 3 to Feb. 22, 2010*  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Feb. 3 to Feb. 22, 2010* Feb. 3 to Feb. 22, 2010* EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. * Because of a problem in collecting the data, this report includes three weeks worth of summaries, rather than the normal two.

278

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Feb. 22 to March 8, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

22 to March 8, 2010 22 to March 8, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. * Because of a problem in collecting the data, this report includes three weeks worth of summaries, rather than the normal two.

279

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - DOE-SR News  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Releases Releases DOE-SR News Releases GROUTING TO BEGIN TOMORROW ON TWO ADDITIONAL SRS WASTE TANKS SR-2013-08 Adobe Acrobat PDF PARSONS' SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY PROJECT EARNS DOE VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM MERIT AWARD SR-2013-07 Adobe Acrobat PDF Public Comment Sought for Savannah River Site Workforce Restructuring Plan SR-2013-06 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Site Citizens Advisory Board Seeking New Members SR-2013-05 Adobe Acrobat PDF Salt Waste Processing Facility: New Leadership SR-2013-04 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Site Exceeds Waste Shipment Goals SR-2013-03 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Operations Office Honors Federal Manager of the Year SR-2013-02 Adobe Acrobat PDF SRS Advisory Board to Hold Augusta Public Meeting March 25-26 SR-2013-01 Adobe Acrobat PDF

280

DOE handbook: Guide to good practices for operational readiness reviews (ORR) team leader`s guide  

SciTech Connect

This guidance section provides instructions, explanations and examples for the performance of all phases of an Operational Readiness Review (ORR). Details pertinent to the Team Leader (TL), Team Members (TM) and Review Coordinator (RC) are outlined. An appendix contains sample forms and correspondence which are typically used to initiate and perform the ORR. Although this document was written specifically for use by DOE ORR Team Leaders, its use may also be beneficial to contractor ORR Team Leaders. The handbook is also useful for Team Leaders of Readiness Assessments conducted in accordance with requirements of DOE O 425.1. Lessons learned, which are promulgated with this handbook, will benefit any line manager, particularly those preparing a facility or process for startup or restart.

NONE

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Transuranic Waste Retrieval from the 218-W-4B and 218-W-4C Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

05 05 Environmental Assessment Transuranic Waste Retrieval from the 218-W-4B and 218-W-4C Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. March 2002 DOE/EA-1405 U.S. Department of Energy Contents Environmental Assessment C-1 March 2002 CONTENTS PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................P-1 GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................ G-1 SCIENTIFIC NOTATION CONVERSION CHART .................................................................... G-2 METRIC CONVERSION CHART...............................................................................................

282

Environmental Survey preliminary report, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site, conducted August 18 through September 5, 1986. The Survey is being conducted by an interdisciplinary team of environmental specialists, led and managed by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health's Office of Environmental Audit. Individual team components are being supplied by a private contractor. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with the Hanford Site. The Survey covers all environmental media and all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. This phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations carried on at the Hanford Site, and interviews with site personnel. The Survey team developed a Sampling and Analysis Plan to assist in further assessing certain of the environmental problems identified during its on-site activities. The Sampling and Analysis Plan will be executed by a DOE National Laboratory or a support contractor. When completed, the results will be incorporated into the Environmental Survey Interim Report for the Hanford Site. The Interim Report will reflect the final determinations of the Hanford Site Survey. 44 refs., 88 figs., 74 tabs.

Not Available

1987-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

Environmental Survey preliminary report, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site, conducted August 18 through September 5, 1986. The Survey is being conducted by an interdisciplinary team of environmental specialists, led and managed by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health's Office of Environmental Audit. Individual team components are being supplied by a private contractor. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with the Hanford Site. The Survey covers all environmental media and all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. This phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations carried on at the Hanford Site, and interviews with site personnel. The Survey team developed a Sampling and Analysis Plan to assist in further assessing certain of the environmental problems identified during its on-site activities. The Sampling and Analysis Plan will be executed by a DOE National Laboratory or a support contractor. When completed, the results will be incorporated into the Environmental Survey Interim Report for the Hanford Site. The Interim Report will reflect the final determinations of the Hanford Site Survey. 44 refs., 88 figs., 74 tabs.

1987-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For December 1 to December 20, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 to December 20, 2010 1 to December 20, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Dec. 13: An Advanced Waste Treatment Facility employee failed to obtain independent verficiation of data entered into the facility's computerized Fissile Material Tracking System. The error did not cause a reduction in the margin of safety of any of the facility's Mass Control Areas. Operations were placed on hold for an investigation, the procedure was clarified and operations resumed. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0026).

285

Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power DOE operations annual site environmental report 1996  

SciTech Connect

Rocketdyne currently operates several facilities in the San Fernando Valley/Simi Valley area, for manufacturing, testing, and research and development (R and D). These operations include manufacturing liquid-fueled rocket engines, such as the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) and engines used for expendable launch vehicles used to place artificial satellites into orbit. This work includes fabrication and testing of rocket engines, lasers, and heat-transfer systems; and R and D in a wide range of high-technology fields, such as the electrical power system for the Space Station. Previously, this work also included development, fabrication, and disassembly of nuclear reactors, reactor fuel, and other radioactive materials, under the Atomics International Division (AI). AI was merged into Rocketdyne in 1984 and many of the AI functions were transferred to existing Rocketdyne departments. This nuclear work was terminated in 1988, and subsequently, all radiological work has been directed toward decontamination and decommissioning (D and D) of the previously used nuclear facilities and associated site areas. The majority of this work is done for the Department of Energy (DOE). This Annual Site Environmental Report for 1996 concentrates on the environmental conditions related to DOE operations at Area IV of SSFL and at De Soto.

Tuttle, R.J. [ed.

1997-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

286

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOE/EA-0821 FOR THE OPERATION OF THE GLASS MELTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

. - . - ..... . - ... .,. ..... .. :,! ~ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOE/EA-0821 FOR THE OPERATION OF THE GLASS MELTER THERMAL TREATMENT UNIT AT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S MOUND PLANT, MIAMISBURG, OHIO . JUNE,1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY L..-_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ DIS _TRIBunON OF !HIS DocM~Sbli R DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. , ' .. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE . . . .. ..... . .. . ...... .. . . .. .. . . ... . ....... ..*..... ... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... .. . .. . . ...... . .. . .. *.. .. . . . ***....... 1·1 1.1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION .. . . * . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . .. 1-1 1.2 BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . * . . . . * * . * * . . . . . . .. 1·2

287

17.6 - Origin, Characteristics, and Significance of the DOE's Management and Operating  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 17.6 (October 2007) Chapter 17.6 (October 2007) 1 DISCUSSION OF THE ORIGIN, CHARACTERISTICS, AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY's MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING (M&O) FORM OF CONTRACT INTRODUCTION. "Management and operating" (M&O) contract is a term used to describe the contracts that are central to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) business model. The term was adopted formally in a memorandum from the Secretary of Energy, dated October 5, 1983. 1 However, these contracts predate the inception of the term by more than thirty-five years, dating to contracts awarded by the Corps of Engineers during World War II, and other contracts awarded by the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) from its creation in the Atomic Energy Act of 1946.

288

DOE KSU EV Site Operator Program. Year 1, fourth quarter report, April 1--June 30, 1992  

SciTech Connect

Kansas State University, with funding from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the DOE Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Kansas State is demonstrating, testing, and evaluating electric of hybrid vehicle technology. This will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU proposes to purchase one (1) electric or hybrid van and four(4) electric cars during the first two years of this five-year program. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has initiated a procurement order to purchase two (2) Soleq 1992 Ford EVcort station wagons. This quarter`s report describes ongoing public relations activities and meetings as well as presenting performance data for the electric vehicles. (GHH)

Hague, J.R.; Steinert, R.A.; Nissen-Pfrang, T.

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For September 27 to October 17, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 to October 17, 2011 7 to October 17, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary Waste Shipments: As of Oct. 15, 2011, a total of 36,625 cubic meters of contact-handled transuranic waste, 106.72 cubic meters of remote-handled transuranic waste, and 4,990 cubic meters of previously-buried transuranic waste have been shipped from Idaho to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico for disposal.

290

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Jan. 19 to Feb. 2, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 to Feb. 2, 2010 9 to Feb. 2, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary Waste Shipments: During the period Jan. 20 through Jan. 26, 2010, BBWI shipped 29.73 cubic meters of mixed low level waste for treatment and disposal at EnergySolutions facility in Clive, UT. BBWI shipped 36.2 cubic meters of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act low level waste for accelerated disposal at the Nevada Test Site.

291

Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power DOE Operations annual site environmental report 1997  

SciTech Connect

This annual report discusses environmental monitoring at two manufacturing and test sites operated in the Los Angeles area by Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power of Boeing North American, Inc. These are identified as Area 4 of the SSFL and the De Soto site. These sites have been used for research and development (R and D), engineering, and testing in a broad range of technical fields primarily in energy research and nuclear reactor technology. The De Soto site had research and development laboratories involved with nuclear research. This work was terminated in 1995 and only D and D activities will have potential for impact on the environment. Since 1956, Area 4 has been used for work with nuclear materials, including fabricating nuclear reactor fuels, testing nuclear reactors, and dissembling used fuel elements. This work ended in 1988 and subsequent efforts have been directed toward decommissioning and decontamination of the former nuclear facilities. The primary purpose of this report is to present information on environmental and effluent monitoring of DOE-sponsored activities to the regulatory agencies responsible for oversight. Information presented here concentrates on Area 4 at SSFL, which is the only area at SSFL where DOE operations were performed.

Robinson, K.S. [ed.

1998-11-23T23:59:59.000Z

292

Environmental assessment, K Pool fish rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has a need to respond to a request to lease facilities at the Hanford Site 100-KE and 100-KW filter plant pools (K Pools) for fish rearing activities. These fish rearing activities would be: (1) business ventures with public and private funds and (2) long-term enhancement and supplementation programs for game fish populations in the Columbia River Basin. The proposed action is to enter into a use permit or lease agreement with the YIN or other parties who would rear fish in the 100-K Area Pools. The proposed action would include necessary piping, pump, and electrical upgrades of the facility; cleaning and preparation of the pools; water withdrawal from the Columbia River, and any necessary water or wastewater treatment; and introduction, rearing and release of fish. Future commercial operations may be included.

NONE

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

293

DOE/EIS-0247; Draft Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source, December 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 1998 December 1998 Construction and Operation of the S PALLATION N EUTRON S OURCE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science DOE/EIS-0247 Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source Facility Draft Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science December 1998 DOE/EIS-0247 Draft, December 1998 Cover Sheet COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source (DOE/EIS-0247) LOCATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE SITES: Illinois, New Mexico, New York, and Tennessee. CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. David Wilfert, EIS Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office

294

New Groundwater Treatment Facility Begins Operation: Boost in Cleanup  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New Groundwater Treatment Facility Begins Operation: Boost in New Groundwater Treatment Facility Begins Operation: Boost in Cleanup Accelerated by Recovery Act Funding New Groundwater Treatment Facility Begins Operation: Boost in Cleanup Accelerated by Recovery Act Funding January 19, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Andre Armstrong, CH2M HILL (509)376-6773 Andre_L_Armstrong@rl.gov Geoff Tyree, DOE (509) 376-4171 Geoffrey.Tyree@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is boosting its capacity for treating groundwater to remove chromium near the Columbia River by 40 percent with the recent completion of a new treatment facility. Contractor CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M HILL) finished building and started operating the new 100-DX groundwater treatment facility in December. The facility is located near the D and DR Reactors on

295

DOE-RL Integrated Safety Management System Description  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Integrated Safety Management System Description (ISMSD) is to describe the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office (RL) ISMS as implemented through the RL Integrated Management System (RIMS). This ISMSD does not impose additional requirements but rather provides an overview describing how various parts of the ISMS fit together. Specific requirements for each of the core functions and guiding principles are established in other implementing processes, procedures, and program descriptions that comprise RIMS. RL is organized to conduct work through operating contracts; therefore, it is extremely difficult to provide an adequate ISMS description that only addresses RL functions. Of necessity, this ISMSD contains some information on contractor processes and procedures which then require RL approval or oversight. This ISMSD does not purport to contain a full description of the contractors' ISM System Descriptions.

SHOOP, D.S.

2000-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA For Participants in the LANS Defined Benefit Pension Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA April for DOE/NNSA Summary of Funding Status LANS and the Department of Energy (DOE) take the funding

297

Expansion of the Volpentest Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response Training and Education Center, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT EXPANSION OF THE VOLPENTEST HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING AND EDUCATION CENTER HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY November 2002 1 November 2002 U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact This page intentionally left blank. 2 November 2002 U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1412, for expanding training and equipment testing facilities at the Volpentest Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response Training and Education Center (HAMMER) on the

298

Review of Operation and Maintenance Experience in the DOE-EPRI Wind Turbine Verification Program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

All the projects within the US Department of Energy (DOE) Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) Wind Turbine Verification Program (TVP) are now in operation. As a result, the emphasis of the owners and operators has shifted from installation and commissioning to a focus on optimizing the operation and maintenance (O and M) activities of the projects. Each project utilizes a unique strategy for performing O and M. O and M personnel for projects in Searsburg, Vermont; Glenmore, Wisconsin; Algona, Iowa; Springview, Nebraska; Kotzebue, Alaska; and Big Spring, Texas include on-site vendor representatives, dedicated utility personnel, and utility personnel who split their time between the wind turbines and other utility responsibilities. Each project has its own set of priorities for balancing turbine availability against safety, minimizing overtime pay, and other utility responsibilities. Various strategies have also been employed to ensure access to tools and spare parts. This paper compares and contrasts the various O and M strategies at TVP projects and reviews the causes of turbine downtime and the frequency and duration of faults.

Conover, K.; VandenBosche, J.; Rhoads, H. (Global Energy Concepts, LLC); Smith, B. (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

2000-09-05T23:59:59.000Z

299

The DOE-JGI Standard Operating Procedure for the Annotations of the Microbial Genomes  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1:63-67 DOI:10.4056/sigs.632 The DOE-JGI Standard OperatingtRNA-Scan, RNAmmer, Rfam, IMG-ER. The DOE-JGI MicrobialAnnotation Pipeline (DOE-JGI MAP) supports gene prediction

Mavromatis, Konstantinos

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

300

http://www.hss.doe.gov/deprep/1995-2/dm95n00b.htm  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Performance Assessment Division U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office Assessment Report AS 95-55 Control of Tank Farms Criticality Authorization Basis Issued:...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA For Participants in the LANS Defined Benefit Pension Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA value of Plan benefits. Those changes

302

Supplement Analysis for the System Operation Review EIS (DOE/EIS-0170/SA-1)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20, 2002 20, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the System Operation Review EIS (DOE/EIS-0170/SA-1) Anthony G. White - PGPL-5 Public Utility Specialist and Secretary, United States Entity Proposed Action: Non-Treaty Storage Agreement (NTSA) - Contract Extension, Contract Number DE-MS79- 90BP92754. Proposed By: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and B.C. Hydro and Power Authority (BC Hydro). Location: British Columbia, Canada. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA and BC Hydro propose to extend the existing NTSA for a period of one year. Analysis: On July 5, 1990, BPA and BC Hydro signed the NTSA, which expanded the amount of non- Treaty storage space available in Canada and extended the then-existing agreement from 1993 to

303

Program Overview DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Overview Overview DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal May 13-14, 2003 presented by E. S. Marmar on behalf of the C-Mod Group C Mod Alcator - Physics and Technology Transport Edge/Divertor RF MHD Integrated Thrusts Advanced Tokamak Burning Plasma Support Next Step(s) High Bootstrap, High β N Quasi-Steady State High Field, High Pressure C Mod Alcator - C Mod Alcator - Unique Capabilities ⇒ Address Key Questions * Unique long pulse capability (relative to skin and L/R times) * highly shaped, diverted, high pressure plasma * 5 second pulse length at B = 5 T → Quasi-steady lower hybrid driven AT scenarios * fully relaxed current profiles * High performance, compact, high field capability →Next Step Burning Plasma issues * Tight e-i coupled regimes * H-mode threshold * Pedestal regulation *

304

Analytical Electron Microscopy examination of uranium contamination at the DOE Fernald operation site  

SciTech Connect

Analytical Electron Microscopy (AEM) has been used to identify uranium-bearing phases present in contaminated soils from the DOE Fernald operation site. A combination of optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy with backscattered electron detection (SEM/BSE), and AEM was used in isolating and characterizing uranium-rich regions of the contaminated soils. Soil samples were prepared for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) by ultramicrotomy using an embedding resin previously employed for aquatic colloids and biological samples. This preparation method allowed direct comparison between SEM and TEM images. At the macroscopic level much of the uranium appears to be associated with clays in the soils; however, electron beam analysis revealed that the uranium is present as discrete phases, including iron oxides, silicates (soddyite), phosphates (autunites), and fluorite. Only low levels of uranium were actually within the clay minerals. The distribution of uranium phases was inhomogeneous at the submicron level.

Buck, E.C.; Dietz, N.L.; Bates, J.K.; Cunnane, J.C.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For August 9 to August 23, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 to August 23, 2011 9 to August 23, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Aug. 16: A required survey detected radioactive contamination on three support pallets during waste loading processes at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility. No contamination has been found on any of the waste containers in the area. A contamination area and buffer area was established and other surveys taken of the area. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2011-0010).

306

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For February 7 to February 27, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7, 2012 to February 27, 2012 7, 2012 to February 27, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Feb. 13: While digging a hole for a fence post at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility, a water line was ruptured. A concern was raised that an accompanying heat trace may have been damaged. A 120 volt heat trace was found in the area and, although it was not damaged, its discovery resulted in the categorization of the event as the unexpected discovery of an uncontrolled hazardous energy source. All work was stopped after the leak occurred, and the water line was isolated. The fact that facility drawings were inadequate to identify underground utilities in the area was entered into the issues tracking system for resolution. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-0006).

307

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For August 3 to August 16, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 to August 16, 2010 3 to August 16, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Aug. 4: It was determined that modifications made in remote equipment located at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility were made without consideration of potential impacts on criticality safety. The equipment - floor-mounted manipulators - will remain out of service until a safety evaluation can be completed. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0018).

308

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Sept. 15 to Sept. 28, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

15 to Sept. 28, 2009 15 to Sept. 28, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Sept. 22: While surveying a trailer at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project, a radiological technician detected contamination on the metal deck of the trailer. The trailer was posted and moved to a contamination area prior to cleanup. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2009-0014).

309

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 15 to June 4, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 to June 4, 2012 5 to June 4, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project May 15: Required regulatory inspections were not carried out at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility during the week of Nov. 21, 2011. They were completed on Nov. 28, 2011. This was not reported through the ORPS system until May 15. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-0014).

310

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For July 13 to August 2, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

July 13 to Aug. 2, 2012 July 13 to Aug. 2, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project July 18: While working on a window-mounted air conditioner at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility, a technician drilled a hole in the condensate collection pan and struck a cooling blade. The air conditioner was removed from service. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-0017).

311

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 6 to April 19, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 to April 19, 2010 6 to April 19, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project April 8: A worker assigned to review lock-out/tag out compliance discovered that some maintenance work under way on the Super Compactor Bagless Transfer Port at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility was being performed without the required safety checks. All work involving lock-out/tag-outs was halted until it could be confirmed that the required safety checks had been performed. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0011).

312

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Feburary 26, 2013 to March 18, 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6, 2013 to Mar. 18, 2013 6, 2013 to Mar. 18, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project March 6: During inspection, a drum of transuranic material that was scheduled for super-compaction at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility was determined to contain more fissile material than allowed by safety regulations. The drum was placed in administrative hold, and movement of fissile material in the Treatment Facility was stopped pending an investigation. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2013-0005).

313

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For March 8 to April 11, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

April 11, 2011 April 11, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project March 10: BBWI, the contractor at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility, received a Notice of Violation from the state of Idaho for $45,192 as a result of noncompliances with the waste acceptance criteria for the AMWTP supercompactor. The waste acceptance criteria prohibits pressurized containers from being treated in the supercompactor. The primary violation involved a charged fire extinguisher - a pressurized container- being treated in the AMWTP supercompactor (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2011-0004).

314

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For November 2 to November 14, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 to November 14, 2010 2 to November 14, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nov. 10: A worker mistakenly allowed a waste drum to be supercompacted at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility without all the proper pre-checks. A non-conformance report was issued, a fact finding held, and all activities involving the Fissile Tracking System were suspended. After the drum was compacted, the assay data was validated and it was determined the drum was acceptable for compaction. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0025).

315

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For June 7 to June 27, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 to June 27, 2011 7 to June 27, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project June 27: An unanticipated level of dust and debris containing some fissile material accumulated in three areas of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility. Compensatory measures were established for the rooms of concern, and a cleanup and recovery plan is under development. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2011-0008).

316

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Dec. 22, 2009 to Jan. 4, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

22, 2009 to Jan. 4, 2010 22, 2009 to Jan. 4, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Dec. 28: After returning from a shutdown period, workers at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project began assaying waste drums without doing a required inspection of the assay equipment. The shift supervisor placed the assay units in suspension mode and a fact-finding meeting was held. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2009-0015).

317

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For March 8 to March 22, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

March 22, 2010 March 22, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project March 11: Workers at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility determined that the degraded condition of some waste boxes may not meet the expectations of current safety documentation. Interim safety steps, including limiting the retrieval of waste from certain areas, were initiated until an in-depth analysis can be completed. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0009).

318

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For September 14 to September 27, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 to September 27, 2010 4 to September 27, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Sept. 14: While loading drums of transuranic waste into a standard waste box at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project, incorrect data for the drums was entered into the Waste Tracking System. The Waste Tracking System would not accept the data, the shift supervisor was notified and all work was stopped. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0022).

319

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For June 5 to June 18, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 to June 18, 2012 5 to June 18, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project June 13: A technician performed maintenance on a piece of mechanical equipment at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility without using a required lockout/tagout that would control the hazardous energy presented by the potential mechanical movement of the equipment arm, and the potential activation of the cell CO2 fire suppression system. A fact-finding investigation was ordered. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-0015).

320

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For December 11, 2012 to January 2, 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

11, 2012 to Jan. 2, 2013 11, 2012 to Jan. 2, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Dec. 10: It was discovered that an over-pack waste drum stored at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility had the same barcode number as a waste drum that had been previously shipped to a mixed low-level waste repository. An investigation was initiated and a review undertaken to determine potential duplicate barcode labels on waste containers remaining on site. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-04).

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For February 28 to March 27, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

28, 2012 to March 27, 2012 28, 2012 to March 27, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project March 8: Three laborers were moving a safe using a dolly at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility when a wheel of the dolly broke through the floor of the building. Two of the laborers suffered back pain from the incident. Movement of all safes was stopped and plywood was put in place over the damaged floor area. (AMWTF-2012-0009).

322

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For January 29, 2013 to February 11, 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

29, 2013 to Feb. 11, 2013 29, 2013 to Feb. 11, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Feb. 6: On at least two different occasions workers at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility found that filters on their respirators were not functioning properly. The contractor has contacted the manufacturer to help resolve the issue. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2013-0003).

323

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For November 13 to December 10, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 to Dec. 10, 2012 3 to Dec. 10, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Dec. 1: The Idaho Treatment Group (ITG) is reviewing a draft report looking into issues regarding ITG's implementation and execution of its Issues Management and Performance Improvement Programs. The contractor is conducting a factual accuracy check of the concerns raised by the report and formulating an action plan to address the concerns. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-0023).

324

Does  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Does Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Yu-San Liu Æ Yining Zeng Æ Yonghua Luo Æ Qi Xu Æ Michael E. Himmel Æ Steve J. Smith Æ Shi-You Ding Received: 26 November 2008 / Accepted: 11 May 2009 / Published online: 19 June 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Exoglucanases are key enzymes required for the efficient hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. It has been proposed that exoglucanases hydrolyze cellulose chains in a processive manner to produce primarily cellobiose. Usually, two functional modules are involved in the processive mechanism: a catalytic module and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). In this report, single molecule tracking techniques were used to analyze the molecular motion of CBMs labeled with quantum dots (QDs) and bound to cellulose crystals. By tracking the single QD, we observed that the family 2 CBM from

325

EA-1211: Relocation and Storage of Isotopic Heat Sources, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposal for relocation and storage of the isotopic heat sources at the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site in Richland, Washington.

326

DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Budget and Schedule Budget and Schedule DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal May 13-14, 2003 presented by E. S. Marmar on behalf of the C-Mod Group C Mod Alcator - C Mod Alcator - National Budget Profiles 22,569 96 427 1,934 20,112 FY04 29,887 29,450 28,710 27,610 25,250 National Project Total 137 130 125 120 110 LANL 630 610 585 560 540 U Texas 2,920 2,810 2,700 2,600 2,500 PPPL 26,200 25,900 25,300 24,330 22,100 MIT FY08 FY07 FY06 FY05 FY04 Institution Guidance 5 Year Proposal 2003 2002 Cryopump/Up. Div. Inner Div Up Adv. Tok. n-control, power, long pulse ITB Studies Overview Schedule (Program Planning Budgets) Operations: 25 Run Weeks/Year (04 - 08) Full Facility Utilization RFX Beam CXRS, MSE, BES Calendar Year 2006 2005 2004 Long Pulse Beam Edge Fluctuation Imaging Hard X-Ray Imaging Alcator C-Mod Tang. HIREX Add Horiz Ports

327

B3.6 SWCX for Indoor Bench-Scale Research Project and Conventional Lab Operations-  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 SWCX for Indoor Bench-Scale Research Project and Conventional Lab Operations- 6 SWCX for Indoor Bench-Scale Research Project and Conventional Lab Operations- Revision 0 Sitewide Categorical Exclusion for Indoor Bench-Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory Operations Introduction LAs defined in the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Richland Operations Office Integrated Management System Procedure, NEPA Analysis at Hanford, a sitewide categorical exclusion is: An application of DOE categorical exclusions described in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A and B, which may apply to Hanford Site proposed actions (activities) that are "sitewide" in nature and extent, ·which the cognizant DOE Hanford NCO has determined fit \Vithin the scope (i.e., same nature and intent, and of the same or lesser scope) of DOE categorical exclusions described in 10

328

DOE  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

DOE DOE /E/A- 0202( 83//Q J Sh or t-T er m En er gy O ut lo ok a to m Quar terly Proje ction s Febru ary 1983 Ene rgy Info rma tion Adm inist ratio n Was hing ton, D.C. t rt jrt .or t lor t lor t .lor t- ior t- ior t <.o rt ort . m .er m -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -T erm -T erm -T erm Nrm ue rgy En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y ^n erg y Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Sh ort -T erm 1 Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm

329

DOE-STD-1033-92; Guide to Good Practices for Operations and Administration Updates Through Required Reading  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-92 3-92 December 1992 CHANGE NOTICE NO.1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION UPDATES THROUGH REQUIRED READING U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No.1 DOE-STD-1033-92 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Operations and Administration Updates Through

330

DOE-STD-1032-92 CN 1; Guide to Good Practices for Operations Organization and Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-92 2-92 December 1992 CHANGE NOTICE NO.1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONS ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No.1 DOE-STD-1032-92 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Operations Organization and Administration

331

DOE-STD-1041-93 CN-1; Guide to Good Practices for Shift Routines and Operating Practices  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-93 1-93 June 1998 Change Notice No. 1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR SHIFT ROUTINES AND OPERATING PRACTICES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A:Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No. 1 DOE-STD-1041-93 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Shift Routines and Operating Practices Page / Section Change

332

DOE-HDBK-1002-96; Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-96 2-96 March 1996 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF CHEMICAL OPERATORS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009491 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 FOREWORD The purpose of the Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators is to provide

333

Westinghouse P.O. Box 1970 Hanford COlTlpany Richland, Washington 99352  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Westinghouse P.O. Box 1970 Westinghouse P.O. Box 1970 Hanford COlTlpany Richland, Washington 99352 Hanford Operations and Engineering Contractor for the U S . Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-87RL10930 Approved for Public Release o-vrrorr 91: WHC-MR-0293 Revision 2 _-- Legend and Legacy: Fifty Years of Defense Production at the Hanford Site M. S. Gerber Date Published September 1992 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Manage men t 3 e f e r e n c e WHC-c: INFORMATION RELEASE REEUEST IN 0 Y 3s % - a - - Referencas Available to I n t e n d e d Audience T r a n s m i t to 00E-HQIOffice o f Scienofic and Tacnnical l n f o r m a a o n x u AurhorlRsquestor (PnnredlSignarure) $ & rnS*G&Gec #/L+ f2 lntenaed Audience u a Internal Sponsor s x t e r n

334

Solar heating, cooling, and hot water systems installed at Richland, Washington. Final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Project Sunburst is a demonstration system for solar space heating and cooling and solar hot water heating for a 14,400 square foot office building in Richland, Washington. The project is part of the US Department of Energy's solar demonstration program, and became operational in April 1978. The solar system uses 6,000 square feet of flat-plate liquid collectors in a closed loop to deliver solar energy through a liquid--liquid heat exchanger to the building heat-pump duct work or 9,000-gallon thermal energy storage tank. A 25-ton Arkla solar-driven absorption chiller provides the cooling, in conjunction with a 2,000 gallon chilled water storage tank and reflective ponds on three sides of the building to reject surplus heat. A near-by building is essentially identical except for having conventional heat-pump heating and cooling, and can serve as an experimental control. An on-going public relations program has been provided from the beginning of the program and has resulted in numerous visitors and tour groups.

Not Available

1979-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

Masters Thesis- Criticality Alarm System Design Guide with Accompanying Alarm System Development for the Radioisotope Production Laboratory in Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

A detailed instructional manual was created to guide criticality safety engineers through the process of designing a criticality alarm system (CAS) for Department of Energy (DOE) hazard class 1 and 2 facilities. Regulatory and technical requirements were both addressed. A list of design tasks and technical subtasks are thoroughly analyzed to provide concise direction for how to complete the analysis. An example of the application of the design methodology, the Criticality Alarm System developed for the Radioisotope Production Laboratory (RPL) of Richland, Washington is also included. The analysis for RPL utilizes the Monte Carlo code MCNP5 for establishing detector coverage in the facility. Significant improvements to the existing CAS were made that increase the reliability, transparency, and coverage of the system.

Greenfield, Bryce A.

2009-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

336

DOE-RL Integrated Safety Management System Program Description  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Program Description (PD) is to describe the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office (RL) ISMS as implemented through the RL Integrated Management System (RIMS). This PD does not impose additional requirements but rather provides an overview describing how various parts of the ISMS fit together. Specific requirements for each of the core functions and guiding principles are established in other implementing processes, procedures, and program descriptions that comprise RIMS. RL is organized to conduct work through operating contracts; therefore, it is extremely difficult to provide an adequate ISMS description that only addresses RL functions. Of necessity, this PD contains some information on contractor processes and procedures which then require RL approval or oversight.

SHOOP, D.S.

2000-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

337

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Los Alamos National Security, HR-B -Revised February 9, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Los Alamos National Security, HR-B - Revised February 9, 2010;An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Los Alamos

338

LA-UR-07-6494 An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LA-UR-07-6494 An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA-6494 An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA · Homeland by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Your Letter of Interest should include the following

339

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Measuring sound in solids at NHMFL  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Measuring Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA 2Unclassified All the science National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA 3Unclassified Linear elasticity--we like it! , / 1 2 TS k l ij ijkl l k

Weston, Ken

340

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For March 19, 2013 to April 3, 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For February 12, 2013 to February...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the...

342

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For January 1, 2013 to January 28...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the...

343

DOE G 151.1-1A, Emergency Management Fundamentals and the Operational Emergency Base Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Guide provides information about the emergency management fundamentals imbedded in the requirements of DOE O 151.1C, as well as acceptable methods of ...

2007-07-11T23:59:59.000Z

344

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For July 6 to July 19, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

activities in this area, including low-level and mixed-low level waste operations, waste handling and warehouse operations will continue. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0014). Operational...

345

EA-0993: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, Washington |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

93: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, 93: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, Washington EA-0993: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Site's proposal to place the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) in a radiologically and industrially safe shutdown condition, suitable for a long-term surveillance and maintenance phase prior to final decontamination and decommissioning. This EA addresses the actions associated with Phase I (Facility Transition) and Phase II (Surveillance and Maintenance). PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD May 1, 1995 EA-0993: Finding of No Significant Impact Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility

346

Integrated Retail & Wholesale Power System Operation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Aliprantis & Leigh Tesfatsion Last Revised: 10 August 2010 1 #12;EPRC-DOE/PNNL Combined Project: Integrated Advisors: David Chassin (DOE/PNNL, Richland, WA) & GridLAB-D Team (PNNL) Todd Hillman and Nivad Navid (MISO Thomas (EPRC Support, ECpE M.S. Student, ISU) Huan Zhao (DOE/PNNL Support, Econ PhD Student, ISU) Start

Tesfatsion, Leigh

347

Microsoft PowerPoint - DOE-PA-Wrkshp_Richland_WA Apr_2010-ASR...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of waste in unlined trenches in 1952 * Received TRU mixed hazardous waste from Rocky Flats * LLW-only disposal began in 1984 in pits 17-20 and disposal of remote handled...

348

SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

SC Systems SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Business Policy and Operations (BPO) BPO Home Leadership Organization Chart .pdf file (195KB) Business Management and Planning (BMP) Division SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Contact Information Business Policy & Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-45/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-0192 F: (301) 903-2481 More Information » SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The SC Systems and Operations Division (SCSO) provides support for the SC HQ users in the areas of operations and maintenance for SC's network infrastructure, operational applications, cyber security, Science web sites and portals, COOP/ disaster recovery, IT property and asset management, and

349

DOE Cites Battelle Memorial Institute for Price-Anderson Violations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorial Institute for Price-Anderson Violations Memorial Institute for Price-Anderson Violations DOE Cites Battelle Memorial Institute for Price-Anderson Violations January 3, 2008 - 5:04pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to the Battelle Memorial Institute (Battelle) for nuclear safety violations at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Battelle is the managing and operating contractor for PNNL in Richland, Washington. The PNOV today issued a series of violations related to two radiological events that occurred at PNNL during the last year. In December 2006, an airborne release of plutonium from a glovebox in the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory occurred as a result of a split in a vacuum exhaust line caused by an inappropriate modification to the vacuum system. In

350

Hanford Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration, June 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-22 6-22 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration Dates of Activity : 06/20/2011 - 06/22/2011 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an operational awareness review of the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration. Result: During the period June 20-22, 2011, an HSS representative participated in an operational assessment of the Cold Vacuum

351

Hydrogen Emergency Response Training for First Responders - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

52 52 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Monte R. Elmore Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Blvd. Richland, WA 99352 Phone: (509) 372-6158 Email: monte.elmore@pnnl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Antonio Ruiz Phone: (202) 586-0729 Email: Antonio.Ruiz@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: * Jennifer Hamilton, California Fuel Cell Partnership (CaFCP), Sacramento, CA * Hanford Fire Department, Richland, WA * Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency

352

FY 2007 Operating Plan for DOE--March 16, 2007.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Operating Plan by Appropriation Operating Plan by Appropriation (Dollars in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Current Operating Congressional Approp. Plan Request Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and conservation Operation and maintenance........................................... 1,781,242 2,065,474 2,187,943 Construction.................................................................... 31,155 89,030 ---- Total, Energy supply and conservation.............................. 1,812,397 2,154,504 2,187,943 Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology..................................................... -20,000 ---- -58,000 Fossil energy research and development....................... 580,669 592,621 566,801

353

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For August 27 to September 13, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Center. Crews also completed constructing containment for Test Reactor Area-603 Hot Cell 3 waste removal activities. Idaho National Laboratory Aug. 26: An operator broke...

354

Internal Site Office Operations | U.S. DOE Office of Science...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

(113KB) Federal Stewardship Internal Site Office Operations Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Ames Site...

355

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For June 15 to July 5, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3, 2010. Idaho Cleanup Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary Decontamination and Decommissioning Work: At the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center, the last...

356

CX-009219: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office (PNSO) and Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL), is proposing to obtain 300 Area electrical services from the City of Richland (COR). CX-009219.pdf More Documents &...

357

DOE Order Self Study Modules - 29 CFR 1910.120 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29 CFR 1910.120 29 CFR 1910.120 HAZARDOUS WASTE OPERATIONS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CENTER Change No: 0 29 CFR 1910.120 Level: Familiar Date: 3/14/05 1 29 CFR 1910.120 HAZARDOUS WASTE OPERATIONS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE FAMILIAR LEVEL _________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to perform the following: 1. Discuss clean-up operations required by the regulation. 2. Discuss corrective actions during clean-up operations covered by the resource conservation and recovery act (RCRA). 3. Discuss operations involving hazardous wastes that are conducted at treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities.

358

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL February 2001  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Environmental Management Performance Report (EMPR) is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office's (DOE-RL's) report of Hanford's Environmental Management (EM) performance by: Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) through Fluor Hanford. Inc. (FH) and its subcontractors; Environmental Restoration Contract through Bechtel Hanford. Inc. (BHI), and its subcontractors; and Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL) for Science and Technology support to the EM Mission. This report is a monthly publication that summarizes EM Site performance under RL, Operations Office. It is organized by the three sections listed above, with each section containing an Executive Summary and Area Performance Summaries. A glossary of terms is provided at the end of this report for reference purposes.

EDER, D.M.

2001-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL November 2001  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Environmental Management Performance Report (EMPR) is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office's (DOE-RL's) report of Hanford's Environmental Management (EM) performance by: Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) through Fluor Hanford, Inc. (FH) and its subcontractors, Environmental Restoration Contract through Bechtel Hanford, Inc. (BHI), and its subcontractors, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL) for Science and Technology support to the EM Mission. This report is a monthly publication that summarizes EM Site performance under RL Operations Office. It is organized by the three sections listed above, with each section containing an Executive Summary and Area Performance Summaries. A glossary of terms is provided at the end of this report for reference purposes.

EDER, D.M.

2001-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL August 2001  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Environmental Management Performance Report (EMPR) is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office's (DOE-RL's) report of Hanford's Environmental Management (EM) performance by: Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) through Fluor Hanford, Inc. (FH) and its subcontractors, Environmental Restoration Contract through Bechtel Hanford, Inc. (BHI), and its subcontractors, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL) for Science and Technology support to the EM Mission. This report is a monthly publication that summarizes EM Site performance under RL Operations Office. It is organized by the three sections listed above, with each section containing an Executive Summary and Area Performance Summaries. A glossary of terms is provided at the end of this report for reference purposes.

EDER, D.M.

2001-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

U N C L A S S I F I E D Operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

U N C L A S S I F I E D Operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA Slide 1 Operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA Slide 2 · General information on Fusion National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA Slide 3 Fusion Energy Sciences (FES) Priorities at LANL: ·Three

362

Energy Department Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Operation of its  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Request for Proposals for Operation Draft Request for Proposals for Operation of its Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Washington Energy Department Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Operation of its Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Washington October 25, 2007 - 3:45pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a draft Request for Proposals (RFP) for prospective contractors who are interested in competing on a full and open basis to manage and operate DOE's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). PNNL is a world-class multi-program national laboratory located in Richland, Washington, whose mission is to deliver science-based solutions for the nation's energy, environmental, and security needs. The draft RFP's Statement of Work highlights the type of work being

363

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Aug. 18 to Aug. 31, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

No incidents to report. No incidents to report. Operational Summary Waste shipments: through Aug. 8, 2009, a total of 28,991 cubic meters of stored transuranic waste, 85.35 cubic meters of remote-handled transuranic waste and 1,221 cubic meters of previously buried transuranic waste have been shipped from Idaho to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico for disposal. Idaho Cleanup Project Aug. 13: A front end loader moving soil inside the Advanced Retrieval Project-III facility hit the bucket of an excavator that was in the nearby service bay for repairs. The incident caused a series of events that pushed a ladder about 18 inches into a nearby worker. No one was injured and there was no damage to the equipment. All equipment operations were halted and a "step back" order was initiated by the operations foreman. (EM-ID-CWI-RWMC-2009-0006).

364

Measurement of environmental radiation exposure rates from Vernita, Hanford Reach, and Richland area shores. Addendum 1  

SciTech Connect

Environmental radiation exposure rate measurements are taken on and around the Hanford Site for Pacific Northwest Laboratory`s Hanford Site Surface Environmental Surveillance Project. In 1992, environmental radiation exposure rate measurements were taken from shoreline and island areas ranging from Vernita, along the Hanford Reach, down to the Richland Pumphouse. Measurements were taken primarily at locations known or expected to have elevated exposure rates as determined by examination of aerial photographs depicting radiation exposure measurements. Results from the 1992 survey indicated radiation exposure rates taken from the Hanford Reach area were elevated in comparison to the measurements taken from the Vernita area with ranges of 8 to 28 {mu}R/hr and 4 to 11 {mu}R/hr, respectively. In January 1994, additional shoreline radiation exposure rate measurements were taken from the Vernita, Hanford Reach, and Richland areas to determine the relationship of radiation exposure rates along the Richland area shores when compared to Vernita and Hanford Reach area exposure rates (measurements along the Richland area were not collected during the 1992 survey). This report discusses the 1994 results and is an addendum to the report that discussed the 1992 survey. An analysis of variance indicated a significant location interaction at a p-value of 0.0014. To determine differences between paried locations a post-hoc comparison of location means was performed on log transformed data using the Scheff{acute e}`s F-test. This test indicated a significant difference between Hanford Reach and Richland area means with a mean difference of 0.075 /{mu}R/hr and a p-value of 0.0014. No significant difference was found between Hanford Reach and Vernita area means: The mean difference was 0.031 {mu}R/hr and the p-value was 0.3138. No significant difference was found between Vernita and Richland area means with a mean difference of 0.044 {mu}R/hr and a p-value of 0.1155.

Cooper, A.T.

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

Shielded Payload Containers Will Enhance the Safety and Efficiency of the DOE's Remote Handled Transuranic Waste Disposal Operations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) disposal operation currently employs two different disposal methods: one for Contact Handled (CH) waste and another for Remote Handled (RH) waste. CH waste is emplaced in a variety of payload container configurations on the floor of each disposal room. In contrast, RH waste is packaged into a single type of canister and emplaced in pre-drilled holes in the walls of disposal rooms. Emplacement of the RH waste in the walls must proceed in advance of CH waste emplacement. This poses a significant logistical constraint on waste handling operations by requiring significant coordination between waste characterization and preparations for shipping among the various generators. To improve operational efficiency, the Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing a new waste emplacement process for certain RH waste streams that can be safely managed in shielded containers. RH waste with relatively low gamma-emitting activity would be packaged in lead-lined containers, shipped to WIPP in existing certified transportation packages for CH waste, and emplaced in WIPP among the stacks of CH waste containers on the floor of a disposal room. RH waste with high gamma-emitting activity would continue to be emplaced in the boreholes along the walls. The new RH container appears essentially the same as a nominal 208-liter drum, but is built with about 2.5 cm of lead, sandwiched between thick steel sheet. The top and bottom are made of very thick plate steel, for strengthening the package to meet transportation requirements, and provide similar gamma attenuation. This robust configuration provides an overpack for waste that otherwise would be remotely handled. Up to a 3:1 reduction in number of shipments is projected if RH waste were transported in the proposed shielded containers. This paper describes the container design and testing, as well as the regulatory approach used to meet the requirements that apply to WIPP and its associated transportation system. This paper describes the RH transuranic waste inventory that may be candidates for packaging and emplacement in shielded containers. DOE does not propose to use shielded containers to increase the amount of RH waste allowed at WIPP. DOE's approach to gain approval for the transportation of shielded containers and to secure regulatory approval for use of shielded containers from WIPP regulators is discussed. Finally, the paper describes how DOE proposes to count the waste packaged into shielded containers against the RH waste inventory and how this will comply with the volume and radioactivity limitations imposed in the many and sometimes overlapping regulations that apply to WIPP. (authors)

Nelson, R.A. [U. S. Department of Energy, Carlsbad, New Mexico (United States); White, D.S. [Washington Group International, Carlsbad, New Mexico (United States)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Independent Oversight Inspection of Classification and Information Control Programs at the Richland Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 2.2 Authorities ............................................................................... 2 2.3 Guidance ................................................................................. 3 2.4 Training ................................................................................... 3 2.5 Document Reviews ................................................................. 4 2.6 Program Evaluation ................................................................. 4 3.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................ 5 4.0 RATINGS ............................................................................................ 5 5.0 OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT ..................................... 6 APPENDIX A: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

367

Environmental Monitoring Plan, United States Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes environmental monitoring activities at Hanford Reservation. Attention is focused on effluent monitoring and environmental surveillance. All Hanford contractors reviewed potential sources of contamination. A facility effluent monitoring plan was written for each facility with the potential to release significant quantities of hazardous materials, addressing both radiological and nonradiological effluent monitoring. The environmental surveillance program assesses onsite and offsite environmental impacts and offsite human health exposures. The program monitors air, surface water, sediment, agricultural products, vegetation, soil, and wildlife. In addition, independent onsite surveillance is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of Hanford Site effluent controls in order to comply with applicable environmental standards and regulations.

Not Available

1994-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

368

Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to further explore the circumstances surrounding the catastrophic failure of exhaust fan EF-1 in the confinement ventilation system (CVS), based upon the number of recent...

369

RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE FLEET MANAGEMENT, WR-B-01-01 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FLEET MANAGEMENT, WR-B-01-01 More Documents & Publications Audit Report on "Hanford Site Radiation and Hazardous Waste Training", WR-B-00-06 Audit Report Analytical Laboratory...

370

DOE/KEURP Site Operator Program year 5 first quarter report, July 1-- September 30, 1995  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Kansas State University, with funding support from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the Department of Energy` s Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Through participation in this program, Kansas State is displaying, testing, and evaluating electric or hybrid vehicle technology. This participation will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU now has two electric cars. Both are electric conversion vehicles from Soleq Corporation out of Chicago. KSU in conjunction with KEURP also initiated procurement for the purchase of four (4) Chevy S-10 pickup trucks. Since the supplier, GE-Spartan, canceled its effort concerning the production of vehicles other appropriate sources were sought. Today, K-State and the Kansas Utilities are working with Troy Design and Manufacturing (TDM), Redford, Michigan. TDM is working with Ford Motor Company and expects to become the first certified electric vehicle Quality Vehicle Modifier (QVM). Kansas State has entered into an agreement to assist TDM in supporting the infrastructure and technical manual development for these vehicles. The Soleq EVcorts have not been signed to illustrate to the public that it is an electric vehicle. Magnetic signs have been made for special functions to ensure sponsor support is recognized and acknowledged. As soon as TDM`s Ford Ranger electric vehicles are delivered they will be used throughout the state by utility companies that are participating with K-State`s Site Operator Program.

NONE

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

Phase I remedial investigation report for the 300-FF-5 operable unit, Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

The focus of this remedial investigation (RI) is the 300-FF-5 operable unit, one of five operable units associated with the 300 Area aggregate of the U.S. Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Hanford Site. The 300-FF-5 operable unit is a groundwater operable unit beneath the 300-FF-1, 300-FF-2, and 300-FF-3 source operable units. This operable unit was designated to include all contamination detected in the groundwater and sediments below the water table that emanates from the 300-FF-1, 300-FF-2, and 300-FF-3 operable units (DOE-RL 1990a). In November 1989, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed the 300 Area on the National Priorities List (NPL) contained within Appendix B of the National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP, 53 FR 51391 et seq.). The EPA took this action pursuant to their authority under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA, 42 USC 9601 et seq.). The DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL), the EPA and Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) issued the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement), in May 1989 (Ecology et al. 1992, Rev. 2). This agreement, among other matters, governs all CERCLA efforts at the Hanford Site. In June 1990, a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) workplan for the 300-FF-5 operable unit was issued pursuant to the Tri-Party Agreement.

NONE

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

Alternative Energy Saving Technology Analysis Report for Richland High School Renovation Project  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

On July 8, 2004, L&S Engineering, Inc. submitted a technical assistance request to Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to help estimate the potential energy savings and cost effectiveness of the solar energy and daylighting design alternatives for Richland High School Renovation Project in Richland, WA. L&S Engineering expected PNNL to evaluate the potential energy savings and energy cost savings, the probable installation costs, incentives or grants to reduce the installed costs and simple payback for the following alternative measures: (1) Daylighting in New Gym; (2) Solar Photovoltaics; (3) Solar Domestic Hot Water Pre-Heat; and (4) Solar Outside Air Pre-Heat Following are the findings of the energy savings and cost-effectiveness analysis of above alternative energy saving technologies.

Liu, Bing

2004-08-09T23:59:59.000Z

373

DOE O 350.2B, Use of Management and Operating or Other Facility Management Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C. Area  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

To establish policies and procedures for management of Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), management and ...

2011-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

374

DOE/KEURP site operator program. Year 3, Second Quarter Report, October 1--December 31, 1993  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Kansas State University, with funding support from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the Department of Energy`s Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Through participation in this program, Kansas State is displaying, testing, and evaluating electric or hybrid vehicle technology. This participation will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU has purchased several electric cars and proposes to purchase additional electric vehicles. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has procured two (2) Soleq 1993 Ford EVcort station wagons. During calendar year 1994, the Kansas` electric vehicle program expects to purchase a minimum of four and a maximum of eleven additional electric vehicles. The G-Van was signed in order for the public to be aware that it was an electric vehicle. Financial participants` names have been stenciled on the back door of the van. The Soleq EvCorts have not been signed. In order to demonstrate the technology as feasible, the EvCorts were deliberately not signed. The goal is to generate a public perception that this vehicle is no different from any similar internal combustion engine vehicle. Magnetic signs have been made for special functions to ensure sponsor support is recognized and acknowledged.

Not Available

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

375

Preliminary definition of the DOE/OCRWM transportation operating system: Final report  

SciTech Connect

This paper is based on the report ''Preliminary Definition of the Transportation Operations System'' and presents a summary of the preliminary definition of transportation operations activities for the cask shipment cycle, commencing with the dispatch of an empty cask, to loading and unloading of cask contents, and preparation of the empty cask for redispatch. It first presents a high-level description of the transportation cycle and then further describes each of the major activities in greater detail. For simplicity of presentation, the highway mode of transport is most often used to describe activities. The reader should keep in mind that the use of other modes will slightly alter the activities and possibly the sequences. Major activities and functions of the system are organized into a first cut of how they could be allocated to specific facilities. The reader should keep in mind that the assignment of functions and the aggregation of these into specific facilities are tasks which have yet to be performed. This paper simply presents a first look at possible groupings of the functions on a facility basis. 12 figs.

Rawl, R.R.; Kline, S.C.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

Confirmatory radiological survey for the 190-C Main Pumphouse Facility decommissioning at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

An independent assessment of remedial action activities at the 190-C Main Pumphouse Facility at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington has been accomplished by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Environmental Assessments Group. The purpose of the assessment was to confirm the site`s compliance with DOE applicable guidelines and provide independent measurements of the activity levels in the 190-C trenches and 105-C process water tunnels. The assessment included reviews of the Decontamination and Decommissioning Plan and data provided in the pre- and post-remedial action surveys. An on-site independent verification survey of the facility was conducted during the period of November 19--21, 1996. The independent verification survey included beta and gamma scans, smears for removable contamination, and direct measurements for beta-gamma activity in the trenches and tunnels. The same measurements and scans, with the addition of alpha measurements, were performed on the floor in the filter repair confinement area. The facility was also spot-checked for direct alpha and beta-gamma activity.

Coleman, R.L. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Forbes, G.H. [Oak Ridge National Lab., Grand Junction, CO (United States). Environmental Technology Section

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

DOE/NV--514 U.S. Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This document presents a general plan to investigate the nature and extent of COPCs at CAUs composed of collection systems and distribution systems (i.e., leachfields) used to dispose of various effluents. All of the features related to the effluent disposal are collectively referred to as "leachfield systems" in this Work Plan. The purpose of the corrective action investigation(s) is to: . Identify the presence, distribution, and nature of COPCs at leachfield systems including septic tanks, leachfields, and associated wastewater collection systems. . Provide sufficient information and data to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for leachfield CAUs. This Work Plan was developed using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) (EPA, 1994c) process to clearly define the goals for collecting and using environmental data and to design a data collection program that will satisfy these goals. General DQOs applicable to the leachfield CAUs were identified in a scoping meeting between the DOE/NV Leachfield Work Plan Section: 1.0 Revision: 1 Date: 12/28/98 and the NDEP as described in Section3.0. Corrective Action Unit-specific DQO scoping meetings will be held prior to the preparation of the CAIPs. 1.2 Scope The scope of this Work Plan is to provide general information concerning the investigation of the leachfield CAUs, thereby eliminating redundant documentation and streamlining the corrective action investigation process. The scope of the CAIPs is the resolution of problem statement(s) identified in the DQO process. The general problem identified for the leachfield CAUs is that various potentially hazardous or radioactive effluents may have been released at the CAUs and that existing data are insufficient to support the d...

Environmental Restoration Division; Controlled Copy No; Revision No

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

378

[Interview]: Alexandre Shvartsburg, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA  

SciTech Connect

Q1. What are your main research activities in ion mobility mass spectrometry (past or present)? My early efforts focused on the structural characterization of atomic (carbon and semiconductor) clusters. After the production of bulk fullerenes, many hoped that other nanoclusters discovered in the gas phase could also coalesce into new materials. As these studies required accurate and robust mobility calculations for any ion geometry, I strived to build the needed theory and implement it in the Mobcal software widely employed today. Since 2004, I have been developing methods and novel applications of differential IMS (FAIMS) at PNNL. The principal achievement has been raising the resolving power by over tenfold (up to ~400 for multiply-charged peptides) using elevated fields, helium and hydrogen-rich buffers, and extended filtering times. This performance broadly allows previously unthinkable separations of very similar species, for example sequence inversions and post-translational modification localization isomers of peptides (including middle-down peptides such as histone tails), lipid regioisomers, and even isotopomers. Another major direction is investigating the dipole alignment of larger proteins, which creates an exceptionally strong FAIMS effect that is a potential tool for structural biology. Q2: What have been the most significant instrumentation or applications developments in the history of ion mobility - mass spectrometry? In 1995 when I started graduate research at Northwestern, only two groups worldwide worked with IMS/MS and the literature meant papers by Bowers (UCSB). Well-wishers counseled me to learn something useful like HPLC, as IMS would never have real utility. This booklet showcases the scale of change since. First, the practical IMS/ToF platforms for complex biological analyses demonstrated by Clemmer have turned IMS/MS from an esoteric physical chemistry technique into a powerful analytical tool. By commercializing the IMS/ToF technology in Synapt instruments, Waters has greatly increased its impact via expanded number and diversity of applications. Concurrently, Guevremont at Canadian NRC has perfected FAIMS coupled to MS, deployed it for real-world bio and environmental analyses, and widely distributed it in the Ionalytics Selectra system (subsequently installed on Thermo MS platforms). The latest breakthrough is ultra-FAIMS by Owlstone, where extreme fields allow numerous qualitatively new separations and operational modes that we just begin to explore. Q3: Where do you see ion mobility - mass spectrometry making the most impact in the next 5 years? Any predictions for where the field will go? Sciences dealing with perturbations in media (such as optics or acoustics) at some point shift from the linear to nonlinear paradigm, where propagation depends on the magnitude of perturbation or its driving force. While the linear part remains industrially important (e.g., eyewear and architectural glass for optics), frontline research moves to nonlinear phenomena. IMS is undergoing that transition now with the rise of FAIMS, which should continue as the fundamental understanding improves, new modalities and applications emerge, and more instrumentation is introduced by vendors. Modifying and augmenting FAIMS separations through vapor dopants that render ion mobilities less linear is becoming routine. I expect this area to advance, extending to more specific interactions and to complexation with solution additives. Another route to higher separation power is integrating FAIMS with conventional IMS; proliferation of both technologies would make such 2-D platforms common. Along with mass spectrometry and conventional IMS, FAIMS will address increasingly large macromolecules, including proteins and their complexes.

Shvartsburg, Alexandre A.

2012-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

DOE Site HSPD-12 Card Issuance Performance Measures 10-8-10.xls  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Field Field Sub-Total Savannah River Operations Office / SRS Oak Ridge - ETTP Idaho Operations Office / INL Richland Operations Office / Office of River Protection / Hanford Site Strategic Petroleum Reserve Office / SPR Site National Energy Technology Laboratory Golden Field Office National Renewable Energy Laboratory EMCBC Carlsbad Field Office / Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Portsmouth / Paducah DOE Naval Petroleum Reserves LM - Grand Junction / Ohio / Morgantown / Rocky Flats % of Target Sponsored 98% 99% 100% 96% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 98% 0% 100% % of Target Enrolled 94% 98% 94% 88% 99% 93% 99% 100% 0% 97% 99% 90% 0% 100% % of Target Delivered 90% 97% 93% 80% 89% 89% 98% 100% 0% 97% 91% 90% 0% 96% % of Target Activated 88% 96% 89% 76% 87% 87% 98% 100% 0% 96% 90% 86% 0% 92% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% HSPD-12 Card Issuance -

380

Kansas State University: DOE/KEURP Site Operator Program. Year 4, fourth quarterly report, April 1, 1995--June 30, 1995  

SciTech Connect

Kansas State University, in support of a DOE and Kansas Electric Utilities Research Program subject contract, continues to test, evaluate, demonstrate, and develop electric vehicle and infrastructure technology. K-State is operating two Soleq EVcort vehicles. During this reporting period both vehicles were brought back to full operational status after warranty service was completed by Soleq. Vehicle failures occurred due to three unrelated battery cable failures in addition to the replacement of one battery. Both vehicles are being operated on a routine basis. K-State, along with York Technical College, has established a relationship with Troy Design and Manufacturing (TDM) Redford, Michigan. K-State has ordered no less than four Ford Ranger electric trucks from TDM. K-State is involved in the steering committee that is monitoring and refining information to direct the design and testing of these new technology vehicles. TDM should become the first automotive manufacturer certified by one of the Big Three under their Quality Vehicle Manufacturer program. Kansas State University and the Kansas Electric Utility Research Program look forward to working with TDM on their new EV program.

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Power Generation from an Integrated Biomass Reformer and Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SBIR Phase III) - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Quentin Ming (Primary Contact), Patricia Irving InnovaTek, Inc. 3100 George Washington Way, Suite 108 Richland, WA 99354 Phone: (509) 375-1093 Email: ming@innovatek.com DOE Managers HQ: Charles Russomanno Phone: (202) 586-7543 Email: Charles.Russomanno@ee.doe.gov HQ: Kathi Epping Martin Phone: (202) 586-7425 Email: Kathi.Epping@ee.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0004535 Project Start Date: October 1, 2010 Project End Date: September 30, 2013 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Establish the requirements and design for an integrated * fuel cell and fuel processor that will meet the technical and operational needs for distributed energy production. Develop and integrate key system components - *

382

Analysis Results for ARRA Projects: Enabling Fuel Cell Market Transformation - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Jennifer Kurtz (Primary Contact), Keith Wipke, Sam Sprik, Todd Ramsden, Genevieve Saur, and Chris Ainscough National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401-3305 Phone: (303) 275-4061 Email: jennifer.kurtz@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Sara Dillich Phone: (202) 586-7925 Email: Sara.Dillich@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA Project Start Date: August 2009 Project End Date: December 2012, with future evaluations covered under DOE's Technology Validation sub-program Objectives Perform an independent assessment of technology in * real-world operation conditions, focusing on fuel cell

383

Operational readiness review implementation plan for K Basin sludge water system  

SciTech Connect

This Implementation Plan (IP) has been prepared consistent with the requirements of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 425.1B, ''Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities'', and DOE-STD-3006-2000, ''Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews'' (ORR) (DOE 2002). The scope of the DOE ORR is described in the RL ''Plan of Action, K Basin Sludge Water System'' (Veitenheimer 2003), prepared by DOE project line management and approved by the RL Manager, the designated Approval Authority, on March 20, 2003. The scope of the contractor ORR is described in the contractor ''Plan of Action for the K Basins Sludge Water System Operational Readiness Review'' (FH 2002a) which was prepared by Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project line management and approved by the DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) Manager on December 19, 2002. DOE Order 425.1B indicates that the Secretarial Officer is the Authorization Authority when substantial modifications are made to a Hazard Category 2 nuclear facility. This Authorization Authority has been delegated to the RL Manager by memorandum from Jessie Hill Roberson, dated February 5, 2003 (Roberson 2003). This IP provides the overall approach and guidelines for performance of the DOE ORR. Appendix A contains the Criteria and Review Approach Documents (CRAD), which define the review objectives and criteria as well as the approach for assessing each objective. ORR results will be published in a final report, as discussed in Section 9.4.

IRWIN, R.M.

2003-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

Specific Administrative Controls Review at the Hanford Site with EM at DOE-RL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report on its Participation in a Review of Selected Aspects of Nuclear Safety at the Hanford Site Plutonium Finishing Plant, November 29 - December 3, 2010 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in the Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC) at the Hanford Site. The EM-23 review included selected programs at the Hanford Site that are under the auspices of the DOE Richland Operations Office. During the review, Independent Oversight personnel reviewed a few of the SACs applicable to the Plutonium Finishing Plant.

385

Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety and Security Safety and Security Report to the Secretary on the Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1 February 2011 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security HSS Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Department-wide Action Plan for the Columbia Accident and Davis-Besse Event ........... 3 3.0 Comprehensive Operating Experience Program ................................................................. 5

386

Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety and Security Safety and Security Report to the Secretary on the Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1 February 2011 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security HSS Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Department-wide Action Plan for the Columbia Accident and Davis-Besse Event ........... 3 3.0 Comprehensive Operating Experience Program ................................................................. 5

387

DOE/EA-1647: Finding of No Significant for the Proposed Construction and Operation of a Cellulosic Ethanol Plant, Treutlen County, Georgia (01/14/09)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

93 93 January 14, 2009 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT for the PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A CELLULOSIC ETHANOL PLANT, TREUTLEN COUNTY, GEORGIA SUMMARY: In October 2007, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) completed an environmental assessment (EA) that analyzed the potential impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed cellulosic ethanol plant in Treutlen County, Georgia. Subsequent to the issuance of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the October 2007 EA, changes were proposed for the design and operating parameters of the facility. In compliance with NEPA (42 U.S. Code [USe] §§ 4321 et seq.) and DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (10 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Section 1021.330) and procedures, DOE completed a supplemental environmental assessment (SEA) to examine the potential environmental impacts associated with

388

DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01; Supplement Analysis for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oakland Operations Office, Oakland, California Oakland Operations Office, Oakland, California 6833/(0(17 $1$/<6,6 147 &RQWLQXHG 2SHUDWLRQ RI /DZUHQFH /LYHUPRUH 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRU\ DQG 6DQGLD 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRULHV /LYHUPRUH 9ROXPH , 0DLQ 5HSRUW March 1999 DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01 6833/(0(17 $1$/<6,6 147 &RQWLQXHG 2SHUDWLRQ RI /DZUHQFH /LYHUPRUH 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRU\ DQG 6DQGLD 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRULHV /LYHUPRUH 9ROXPH , 0DLQ 5HSRUW March 1999 DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01 Supplement Analysis March 1999 iii CONTENTS NOTATION......................................................................................................................... vii SUMMARY......................................................................................................................... S-1 1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................

389

SITEWIDE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION fOR SITING, CONSTRUCI1NG, MODIFYING, AND OPERATING SMALL-SCALE STRUcrURES, PACIfiC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 SITEWIDE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION fOR SITING, CONSTRUCI1NG, MODIFYING, AND OPERATING SMALL-SCALE STRUcrURES, PACIfiC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON Proposed Action: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) proposes to site, construct, modify, and operate small-scale support buildings and structures. Location of Action: The proposed action would occur on the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Site and in the vicinity ofPNNL facilities in the State of Washington. Description of tbe Proposed Action: DOE proposes to site, construct, modify, and/or operate small-scale support structures. Siting and construction activities would generally be limited to small facilities and support structures, such as parking areas and storage facilities, that are within or

390

Geologic map of the Richland 1:100,000 quadrangle, Washington  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This map of the Richland 1:100,000-scale quadrangle, Washington, shows the geology of one of fifteen complete or partial 1:100,000-scale quadrangles that cover the southeast quadrant of Washington. Geologic maps of these quadrangles have been compiled by geologists with the Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources (DGER) and Washington State University and are the principal data sources for a 1:250,000-scale geologic map of the southeast quadrant of Washington, which is in preparation. Eleven of these quadrangles are being released as DGER open-file reports. The map of the Wenatchee quadrangle has been published by the US Geological Survey, and the Moses Lake, Ritzville quadrangles have already been released.

Reidel, S.P.; Fecht, K.R. [comps.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

Operation, modification, and maintenance of DOE/PETC 700 H. P. combustion test facility. Yearly activity report, April 3, 1978--April 1, 1979  

SciTech Connect

The operation, modifications and maintenance of the DOE/PETC 700 H.P. combustion test facility are described. Shakedown and operation limit tests were performed with No. 6 fuel oil and 30% COM. The tests involved flame studies, erosion, corrosion and the examination of boiler deposits. Various construction, modification and maintenance efforts are detailed. The original 100 H.P. test facility was scrapped after 3 months operation under this contract and construction of a new 100-20 H.P. test facility begun. (LTN)

1978-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

392

Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA (DOE/EA-1442) (12/02)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California December 2002 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Oakland Operations Office EA for the Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at LLNL ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), has responsibility for national programs to reduce and counter threats from weapons of mass destruction including nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (bioweapons). NNSA's bioscience work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in support of these missions requires work with infectious agents, including those historically used for bioweapons.

393

LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP AT DOE HANFORD SITE - 12575  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site is located in southeast Washington and consists of 1,518 square kilometers (586 square miles) of land. Established in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project, Hanford workers produced plutonium for our nation's nuclear defense program until the mid 1980's. Since then, the site has been in cleanup mode that is being accomplished in phases. As we achieve remedial objectives and complete active cleanup, DOE will manage Hanford land under the Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) Program until completion of cleanup and the site becomes ready for transfer to the post cleanup landlord - currently planned for DOE's Office of Legacy Management (LM). We define Hanford's LTS Program in the ''Hanford Long-Term Stewardship Program Plan,'' (DOE/RL-201 0-35)[1], which describes the scope including the relationship between the cleanup projects and the LTS Program. DOE designed the LTS Program to manage and provide surveillance and maintenance (S&M) of institutional controls and associated monitoring of closed waste sites to ensure the protection of human health and the environment. DOE's Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and Hanford cleanup and operations contractors collaboratively developed this program over several years. The program's scope also includes 15 key activities that are identified in the DOE Program Plan (DOE/RL-2010-35). The LTS Program will transition 14 land segments through 2016. The combined land mass is approximately 570 square kilometers (220 square miles), with over 1,300 active and inactive waste sites and 3,363 wells. Land segments vary from buffer zone property with no known contamination to cocooned reactor buildings, demolished support facilities, and remediated cribs and trenches. DOE-RL will transition land management responsibilities from cleanup contractors to the Mission Support Contract (MSC), who will then administer the LTS Program for DOE-RL. This process requires an environment of cooperation between the contractors and DOE-RL. Information Management (IM) is a key part of the LTS program. The IM Program identifies, locates, stores, protects and makes accessible Hanford LTS records and data to support the transfer of property ultimately to LM. As such, DOE-RL manages the Hanford LTS Program in a manner consistent with LM's goals, policies, and procedures.

MOREN RJ; GRINDSTAFF KD

2012-01-11T23:59:59.000Z

394

DOE/ex-oooos CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION HANFORD PATROL 200 EAST AREA BUILDING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ex-oooos ex-oooos CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION HANFORD PATROL 200 EAST AREA BUILDING (PROJECT S-227) HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON PROPOSED ACTION The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to construct an insulated concrete form office building in 200 East Area. The proposed facility provides operational support staff office space and parking for government and private vehicles. LOCATION OF ACTION The location of the proposed action is in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Site. The proposed new building will be directly east of the 2721-E Building. The parking lot will be located south of the proposed new building and south of the 2727-E Building. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action will construct a 12,000 square foot insulated concrete form building to

395

A team leadership approach to managing the transition from construction to operations for an environmental project  

SciTech Connect

This presentation describes a team approach, at the totalproject level that focused team members with common objectives, for the transition to start-up and operation of the project. The Integrated Management Team (IMT) approach has been successful for this US Department of Energy (DOE) environmental restoration project at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. The $53.8-million project will collect, treat, and dispose of low-level mixed waste water discharges from the Hanford Site. Construction is scheduled for completion in September 1994 and facility start-up in June 1995. The project challenge is for leadership that is committed to the transition from construction to operation of the environmental restoration project.

Kelly, J.W.

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

396

U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1958 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EA-1958 DOE/EA-1958 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO THE WILLIAM R. WILEY ENVIRONMENTAL MOLECULAR SCIENCES LABORATORY, PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON (DOE/EA-1958) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF SCIENCE, PACIFIC NORTHWEST SITE OFFICE Finding of No Significant Impact July 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1958 This page intentionally left blank. Finding of No Significant Impact July 2013

397

Management of Hanford Site non-defense production reactor spent nuclear fuel, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) needs to provide radiologically, and industrially safe and cost-effective management of the non-defense production reactor spent nuclear fuel (SNF) at the Hanford Site. The proposed action would place the Hanford Site`s non-defense production reactor SNF in a radiologically- and industrially-safe, and passive storage condition pending final disposition. The proposed action would also reduce operational costs associated with storage of the non-defense production reactor SNF through consolidation of the SNF and through use of passive rather than active storage systems. Environmental, safety and health vulnerabilities associated with existing non-defense production reactor SNF storage facilities have been identified. DOE has determined that additional activities are required to consolidate non-defense production reactor SNF management activities at the Hanford Site, including cost-effective and safe interim storage, prior to final disposition, to enable deactivation of facilities where the SNF is now stored. Cost-effectiveness would be realized: through reduced operational costs associated with passive rather than active storage systems; removal of SNF from areas undergoing deactivation as part of the Hanford Site remediation effort; and eliminating the need to duplicate future transloading facilities at the 200 and 400 Areas. Radiologically- and industrially-safe storage would be enhanced through: (1) removal from aging facilities requiring substantial upgrades to continue safe storage; (2) utilization of passive rather than active storage systems for SNF; and (3) removal of SNF from some storage containers which have a limited remaining design life. No substantial increase in Hanford Site environmental impacts would be expected from the proposed action. Environmental impacts from postulated accident scenarios also were evaluated, and indicated that the risks associated with the proposed action would be small.

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

398

DOE/EIS-0075-SA-02: Operational and Engineering Modifications and Regulatory Review Supplemental Analysis of Site-Specific and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statements (September 2009)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS OF SITE-SPECIFIC AND PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS: OPERATIONAL AND ENGINEERING MODIFICATIONS, AND REGULATORY REVIEW U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve 900 Commerce Road East New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 September 2009 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Page 3 of 51 Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office under Contract No. DE-AC96-03PO92207 DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company 850 South Clearview Parkway New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 Page 4 of 51 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Table of Contents I. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 6

399

DOE/EA-  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA- EA- 0904 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACCESS ROAD FROM STATE ROIYFE 240 TO THE 200 WEST AREA HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FEBRUARY 1994 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United Stata Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their * employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- once herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom. mendation, or favoring by the United States Government

400

Operational Readiness Review Implementation Plan for the K Basin Fuel Transfer System  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This implementation plan has been prepared to comply with the requirements of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 425.1A, Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities, and DOE-STD-3006-2000, Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) (DOE 2002). The scope of the ORR is described in the contractor K Basin Fuel Transfer System (FTS) Plan of Action (POA), which was prepared by Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project line management and approved by the DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) Manager on April 4, 2002 (FH 2002a). While the Project Hanford Management Contractor has been revised to include DOE Order 425.1B, the contractor implementing procedure, ''F-PRO-055, Startup Readiness (Revision 9) has not yet been approved by RL for contractor use. Appendix A provides a crosswalk between the requirements of DOE Order 425.1A and DOE Order 425.1B to show that all requirements of DOE 425.1B are covered by this implementation plan. DOE Order 425.1B indicates that the Secretarial Officer is the Authorization Authority when substantial modifications are made to a Hazard Category 2 nuclear facility. This Authorization Authority has been delegated to the RL Manager by memorandum from Jessie Hill Roberson, dated November 20, 2001 (Roberson 2001). The scope of the ORR is described in the RL Plan of Action, K Basin Fuel Transfer System, prepared by DOE project line management and approved by the RL Manager, the designated approval authority, on September 12, 2002 (Schlender 2002). This implementation plan provides the overall approach and guidelines for performance of the DOE ORR. Appendix B contains the Criteria and Review Approach Documents (CRAD), which define the review objectives and criteria as well as the approach for assessing each objective. ORR results will be published in a final report, as discussed in Section 9.4.

DAVIES, T.H.

2002-09-23T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Environmental Assessment for the Transfer of 1100 AREA, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

This environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared to assess potential environmental impacts associated with the U.S. Department of Energy's proposed action: the transfer of the 1100 Area, southern rail connection and rolling stock to a non-federal entity. Impact information contained herein will be used by the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office Manager, to determine if the proposed action is a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. If the proposed action is determined to be major and significant, an environmental impact statement will be prepared. If the proposed action is determined not to be major and significant, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) will be issued and the action can proceed. Criteria used to evaluate significance can be found in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1508.27. This EA was prepared in compliance with the ''National Environmental Policy Act'' (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508), and the U.S. Department of Energy Implementing Procedures for NEPA (10 CFR 1021). The following is a description of each section of the EA. (1) Purpose and Need for Action. This provides a brief statement concerning the problem or opportunity the U.S. Department of Energy is addressing with the proposed action. As necessary, background information is provided. (2) Description of the Proposed Action. A description with sufficient detail to identify potential environmental impacts is provided. (3) Alternatives to the Proposed Action. Reasonable alternative actions, which would address the Purpose and Need, are described. A no action alternative, as required by 10 CFR 1021, also is described. (4) Affected Environment. This provides a brief description of the locale in which the proposed action takes place, and which may be environmentally impacted. (5) Environmental Impacts. The range of environmental impacts, beneficial and adverse, are described for the proposed action. Impacts of alternatives briefly are discussed. (6) Permits and Regulatory Requirements. A brief description of permits and regulatory requirements for the proposed action is provided. (7) Organizations Consulted. Any outside agencies, groups, or individuals contacted as part of environmental assessment documentation preparation are listed. (8) References. Documents used to provide information or data are listed. The appendices contain additional information necessary to support an understanding of the proposed action, alternatives, and potential impacts is provided. Comments resulting from review of the environmental assessment by states and tribes or other stakeholders and the response to those comments will be included in the appendices.

N /A

1998-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, WA DOE announces the availability of its Final Tank Closure and Waste Management EIS for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (Final TC & WM EIS, DOE/EIS-0391), prepared pursuant NEPA. This Final EIS addresses all public comments on the Draft TC & WM EIS, which was issued in October 2009, and identifies DOE's preferred alternatives. EIS-0391-FEIS-DOENOA-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications Application to Export Electric Energy OE Docket No. EA-387 Energia Renovable S.C., LLC: Federal Register Notice, Volume 77, No. 241 - Dec. 14, 2012 EIS-0391: EPA Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact

403

EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, WA DOE announces the availability of its Final Tank Closure and Waste Management EIS for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (Final TC & WM EIS, DOE/EIS-0391), prepared pursuant NEPA. This Final EIS addresses all public comments on the Draft TC & WM EIS, which was issued in October 2009, and identifies DOE's preferred alternatives. EIS-0391-FEIS-DOENOA-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications Application to Export Electric Energy OE Docket No. EA-387 Energia Renovable S.C., LLC: Federal Register Notice, Volume 77, No. 241 - Dec. 14, 2012

404

Environmental Management Performance Report 11/1999  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Environmental Management Performance Report (EMPR) is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office's (DOE-RL's) report of Hanford's Environmental Management performance by: US Department of Energy, Richland Operation

EDER, D.M.

2000-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

DOE-NE Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program and EPRI Long-Term Operations Program Joint Research and Development Plan  

SciTech Connect

Nuclear power has contributed almost 20% of the total amount of electricity generated in the United States over the past two decades. High capacity factors and low operating costs make nuclear power plants (NPPs) some of the most economical power generators available. Further, nuclear power remains the single largest contributor (nearly 70%) of non-greenhouse gas-emitting electric power generation in the United States. Even when major refurbishments are performed to extend operating life, these plants continue to represent cost-effective, low-carbon assets to the nation's electrical generation capability.

Don Williams

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

Maintenance and operation of the U.S. DOE Alternative Fuel Center. Final subcontract report, 5 August 1994--4 August 1995  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Alternative Fuel Center (AFC) was established by the US Department of Energy (DOE) as part of the Alternative Fuel Utilization Program (AFUP). The AFC is designed to provide drum quantities of finished transportation fuels from a variety of sources. DOE funded the design, construction, and installation of a hydrogenation pilot plant capable of performing a range of hydrotreating, reforming, and hydrocracking operations. Southwest Research Institute provided the building, utilities, and laboratory and safety systems needed for the pilot plant. The AFC work reported here contributes to the two primary objectives of the AFUP: data for alternative-fuel-capable vehicles to enhance energy security, and data for controlling emissions for improved air quality.

Erwin, J.; Moulton, D.S. [Southwest Research Inst., San Antonio, TX (United States)

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Construction and Operation of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), California (DOE/EA-1426) (2/28/03)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), California. AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1426, evaluating the proposed action to construct and operate the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC). Based upon the information and analyses in the EA, the DOE has determined that the proposed federal action does not significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

408

DOE/EIS-0380: 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory Mitigation Action Plan (December 2008)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Title: Title: 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory (DOE/EIS 0380) Mitigation Action Plan U.S. Department of Energy Date: December 2008 Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer, is operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC52-06NA25396. By acceptance of this article, the publisher recognizes that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. Los Alamos National Laboratory requests that the publisher identify this

409

POTENTIAL USE OF ACTIVATED CARBON TO RECOVER TC-99 FROM 200 WEST AREA GROUNDWATER AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO MORE EXPENSIVE RESINS HANFORD SITE RICHLAND WASNINGTON  

SciTech Connect

Recent treatability testing performed on groundwater at the 200-ZP-1 Operable Unit at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington, has shown that Purolite{reg_sign} A530E resin very effectively removes Tc-99 from groundwater. However, this resin is expensive and cannot be regenerated. In an effort to find a less expensive method for removing Tc-99 from the groundwater, a literature search was performed. The results indicated that activated carbon may be used to recover technetium (as pertechnetate, TCO{sub 4}{sup -}) from groundwater. Oak Ridge National Laboratory used activated carbon in both batch adsorption and column leaching studies. The adsorption study concluded that activated carbon absorbs TCO{sub 4}{sup -} selectively and effectively over a wide range of pH values and from various dilute electrolyte solutions (< 0.01 molarity). The column leaching studies confirmed a high adsorption capacity and selectivity of activated carbon for TCO{sub 4}{sup -}. Since activated carbon is much less expensive than Purolite A530E resin, it has been determined that a more extensive literature search is warranted to determine if recent studies have reached similar conclusions, and, if so, pilot testing of 200-ZP-1 groundwater wi11 likely be implemented. It is possible that less expensive, activated carbon canisters could be used as pre-filters to remove Tc-99, followed by the use of the more expensive Purolite A530E resin as a polishing step.

BYRNES ME; ROSSI AJ; TORTOSO AC

2009-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

410

Kansas State University DOE/KEURP Site Operator Program. Year 3, Third quarter report, January 1, 1994--March 31, 1994  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Formed on July 15, 1981, the goal of this program is to undertake applied research and development projects that may enhance reliability and minimize the cost of electric service in Kansas. The Kansas Electric Utilities Research Program (KEURP) is a contractual joint venture between six major electric utilities that serve the residents of the State of Kansas. The establishment of KEURP was made possible by the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC). The KCC allowed Kansas electric utilities to include research and development (R & D) costs in their operating expenses, including dues to the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Kansas universities play a unique role in KEURP with representation on the executive, technical and advisory committees of the program. The universities receive significant direct and indirect support from KEURP through direct funded projects as well as KEURP/EPRI co-funded projects. KEURP is working with EPRI researchers on projects to develop or expand Kansans knowledge and expertise in the fields of high technology and economic development. KEURP is a major source of funding in the electric/hybrid vehicle demonstration program.

Hague, J.R.

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Phase 1 remedial investigation report for 200-BP-1 operable unit. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site, in Washington State is organized into numerically designated operational areas including the 100, 200, 300, 400, 600, and 1100 Areas. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in November 1989 included the 200 Areas of the Hanford Site on the National Priority List (NPL) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Inclusion on the NPL initiated the remedial investigation (RD process for the 200-BP-1 operable unit. These efforts are being addressed through the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Ecology et al. 1989) which was negotiated and approved by the DOE, the EPA, and the State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) in May 1989. This agreement, known as the Tri-Party Agreement, governs all CERCLA efforts at Hanford. In March of 1990, the Department of Energy, Richland Operations (DOE-RL) issued a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) work plan (DOE-RL 1990a) for the 200-BP-1 operable unit. The work plan initiated the first phase of site characterization activities associated with the 200-BP-1 operable unit. The purpose of the 200-BP-1 operable unit RI is to gather and develop the necessary information to adequately understand the risks to human health and the environment posed by the site and to support the development and analysis of remedial alternatives during the FS. The RI analysis will, in turn, be used by Tri-Party Agreement signatories to make a risk-management-based selection of remedies for the releases of hazardous substances that have occurred from the 200-BP-1 operable unit.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

412

DOE/EA-1647: Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the Construction and Operation of a Proposed Cellulosic Ethanol Plant, Range Fuels Soperton Plant, LLC (January 2009)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

S S u p p l e m e n t a l E n v i r o n m e n t a l A s s e s s m e n t a n d N o t i c e o f W e t l a n d s I n v o l v e m e n t Construction and Operation of a Proposed Cellulosic Ethanol Plant, Range Fuels Soperton Plant, LLC (formerly Range Fuels Inc.) Treutlen County, Georgia DOE/EA 1647 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy January 2009 Contents Section Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................... v 1.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ..........................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action ..........................................................2

413

Audit Report: WR-B-00-01 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 Audit Report: WR-B-00-01 November 23, 1999 Analytical Laboratory Capabilities at the Hanford Site The Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (Richland) was...

414

Department of Energy Office of Science Pacific Northwest Site Office Environmental Monitoring Plan for the DOE-SC PNNL Site  

SciTech Connect

The Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) manages the contract for operations at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Site in Richland, Washington. Radiological operations at the DOE-SC PNNL Site expanded in 2010 with the completion of facilities at the Physical Sciences Facility. As a result of the expanded radiological work at the site, the Washington State Department of Health (WDOH) has required that offsite environmental surveillance be conducted as part of the PNNL Site Radioactive Air Emissions License. The environmental monitoring and surveillance requirements of various orders, regulations, and guidance documents consider emission levels and subsequent risk of negative human and environmental impacts. This Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) describes air surveillance activities at the DOE-SC PNNL Site. The determination of offsite environmental surveillance needs evolved out of a Data Quality Objectives process (Barnett et al. 2010) and Implementation Plan (Snyder et al. 2010). The entire EMP is a compilation of several documents, which include the Main Document (this text), Attachment 1: Sampling and Analysis Plan, Attachment 2: Data Management Plan, and Attachment 3: Dose Assessment Guidance.

Snyder, Sandra F.; Meier, Kirsten M.; Barnett, J. M.; Bisping, Lynn E.; Poston, Ted M.; Rhoads, Kathleen

2011-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

415

Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

This Final ''Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement'' (HCP EIS) is being used by the Department of Energy (DOE) and its nine cooperating and consulting agencies to develop a comprehensive land-use plan (CLUP) for the Hanford Site. The DOE will use the Final HCP EIS as a basis for a Record of Decision (ROD) on a CLUP for the Hanford Site. While development of the CLUP will be complete with release of the HCP EIS ROD, full implementation of the CLUP is expected to take at least 50 years. Implementation of the CLUP would begin a more detailed planning process for land-use and facility-use decisions at the Hanford Site. The DOE would use the CLUP to screen proposals. Eventually, management of Hanford Site areas would move toward the CLUP land-use goals. This CLUP process could take more than 50 years to fully achieve the land-use goals.

N /A

1999-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Department of Energy Idaho Operations Summary Releases  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Press Box > DOE-Idaho Operations Summary DOE-Idaho Operations Summary These summaries provide information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho....

417

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

when the worker's equipment unintentionally came in contact with an energized 120V transformer. The unintentional contact did not result in any shock or injury to the worker. The...

418

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

reactor tests. The Idaho Cleanup Project will treat the sodium-contaminated debris in a hot cell, where the waste will be sorted and segregated before it is loaded into baskets...

419

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-02): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 3/9/01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3/09/01 3/09/01 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-02) Bill Erickson - TFP/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Danger tree clearing on nine ROWs. Locations are: the Franklin-Badger Canyon #2; Hedges Tap; White Bluffs-Richland; Grandview-Richland; Badger Canyon-Richland; Franklin- Riverview; Taylor Flats Tap; Walla Walla-Pendleton; and McNary-Slatt Transmission lines. Location: All ROWs are located in the Walla Walla Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear danger trees from varying widths of the indicated transmission line rights-of way that are approaching electrical clearance zones in

420

Environmental assessment of SP-100 ground engineering system test site: Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to modify an existing reactor containment building (decommissioned Plutonium Recycle Test Reactor (PRTR) 309 Building) to provide ground test capability for the prototype SP-100 reactor. The 309 Building (Figure 1.1) is located in the 300 Area on the Hanford Site in Washington State. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires that Federal agencies assess the potential impacts that their actions may have on the environment. This Environmental Assessment describes the consideration given to environmental impacts during reactor concept and test site selection, examines the environmental effects of the DOE proposal to ground test the nuclear subsystem, describes alternatives to the proposed action, and examines radiological risks of potential SP-100 use in space. 73 refs., 19 figs., 7 tabs.

1988-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for Expansion and Operation of the Central Shops Borrow Pit at the Savannah River Site (DOE/EA-1194)(10/29/03)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for Expansion and Operation of the Central Shops Borrow Pit at the Savannah River Site Agency: U. S. Department of Energy Action: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1194) in 1997 for the expansion and operation of the existing Central Shops Borrow Pit (i.e., SRS Facility 632-G) at the Savannah River Site (SRS), located near Aiken, South Carolina. This EA was prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended; the requirements of the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing NEPA (40 CFR 15400-1508); and the DOE Regulations for Implementing NEPA (10 CFR 1021). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that

422

Advanced Materials for Reversible Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (RSOFC), Dual-Mode Operation with Low Degradation - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Eric Tang, Tony Wood, Sofiane Benhaddad, Casey Brown, Hongpeng He, Jeff Nelson, Oliver Grande, Ben Nuttall, Mark Richard, Randy Petri (Primary Contact) Versa Power Systems 10720 Bradford Road #110 Littleton, CO 80127 Phone: (303) 226-0762 Email: randy.petri@versa-power.com DOE Managers HQ: Kathi Epping Martin Phone: (202) 586-7425 Email: Kathi.Epping@ee.doe.gov

423

Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact: Widening Trench 36 of the 218-E-12B Low-Level Burial Ground, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

This environmental assessment was prepared to assess potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed action to widen and operate unused Trench 36 in the 218-E-12B Low-Level Burial Ground for disposal of low-level waste. Information contained herein will be used by the Manager, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, to determine if the Proposed Action is a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. If the Proposed Action is determined to be major and significant, an environmental impact statement will be prepared. If the Proposed Action is determined not to be major and significant, a Finding of No Significant Impact will be issued and the action may proceed. Criteria used to evaluate significance can be found in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations 1508.27. This environmental assessment was prepared in compliance with the ''National Environmental Policy Act of1969'', as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of ''National Environmental Policy Act'' (Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations 1500-1508), and the U.S. Department of Energy Implementing Procedures for ''National Environmental Polio Act'' (Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations 1021). The following is a description of each section of this environmental assessment. (1) Purpose and Need for Action. This section provides a brief statement concerning the problem or opportunity the U.S, Department of Energy is addressing with the Proposed Action. Background information is provided. (2) Description of the Proposed Action. This section provides a description of the Proposed Action with sufficient detail to identify potential environmental impacts. (3) Alternatives to the Proposed Action. This section describes reasonable,alternative actions to the Proposed Action, which addresses the Purpose and Need. A No Action Alternative, as required by Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations 1021, also is described. (4) Affected Environment. This section provides a brief description of the locale in which the Proposed Action would take place. (5) Environmental Impacts. This section describes the range of environmental impacts, beneficial and adverse, of the Proposed Action. Impacts of alternatives briefly are discussed. (6) Permits and Regulatory Requirements. This section provides a brief description of permits and regulatory requirements for the Proposed Action. (7) Organizations Consulted. This section lists any outside groups, agencies, or individuals contacted as part of the environmental assessment preparation and/or review. (8) References. This section provides a list of documents used to contribute information or data in preparation of this environmental assessment.

N /A

1999-02-11T23:59:59.000Z

424

Safe interim storage of Hanford tank wastes, draft environmental impact statement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Draft EIS is prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). DOE and Ecology have identified the need to resolve near-term tank safety issues associated with Watchlist tanks as identified pursuant to Public Law (P.L.) 101-510, Section 3137, ``Safety Measures for Waste Tanks at Hanford Nuclear Reservation,`` of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991, while continuing to provide safe storage for other Hanford wastes. This would be an interim action pending other actions that could be taken to convert waste to a more stable form based on decisions resulting from the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) EIS. The purpose for this action is to resolve safety issues concerning the generation of unacceptable levels of hydrogen in two Watchlist tanks, 101-SY and 103-SY. Retrieving waste in dilute form from Tanks 101-SY and 103-SY, hydrogen-generating Watchlist double shell tanks (DSTs) in the 200 West Area, and storage in new tanks is the preferred alternative for resolution of the hydrogen safety issues.

Not Available

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

Environmental assessment for the relocation and storage of isotopic heat sources, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

As part of a bilateral agreement between the Federal Minister for Research and Technology of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) and the DOE, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) developed processes for the treatment and immobilization of high-level radioactive waste. One element of this bilateral agreement was the production of sealed isotopic heat sources. During the mid-1980s, 30 sealed isotopic heat sources were manufactured. The sources contain a total of approximately 8.3 million curies consisting predominantly of cesium-137 and strontium-90 with trace amounts of transuranic contamination. Currently, the sources are stored in A-Cell of the 324 Building. Intense radiation fields from the sources are causing the cell windows and equipment to deteriorate. Originally, it was not intended to store the isotopic heat sources for this length of time in A-cell. The 34 isotopic heat sources are classified as remote handled transuranic wastes. Thirty-one of the isotopic heat sources are sealed, and seals on the three remaining isotopic heat sources have not been verified. However, a decision has been made to place the remaining three isotopic heat sources in the CASTOR cask(s). The Washington State Department of Health (WDOH) has concurred that isotopic heat sources with verified seals or those placed into CASTOR cask(s) can be considered sealed (no potential to emit radioactive air emissions) and are exempt from WAC Chapter 246-247, Radiation Protection-Air Emissions.

NONE

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County December 20, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Salony, DOE 509-376-0402, Cameron.Salony@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a contract to the Benton County Sheriff's Office in Kennewick, Wash., to provide law enforcement services at the DOE Hanford Site. The contract has a five-year period of performance, consisting of a one-year base period, with four one-year option periods and an approximate total value of $5 million. As the law enforcement contractor, the sheriff's office will: Ensure site employees obey traffic laws Investigate suspected or reported violations of law Apprehend and arrest those suspected of committing violations of law

427

DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County December 20, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Salony, DOE 509-376-0402, Cameron.Salony@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a contract to the Benton County Sheriff's Office in Kennewick, Wash., to provide law enforcement services at the DOE Hanford Site. The contract has a five-year period of performance, consisting of a one-year base period, with four one-year option periods and an approximate total value of $5 million. As the law enforcement contractor, the sheriff's office will: Ensure site employees obey traffic laws Investigate suspected or reported violations of law Apprehend and arrest those suspected of committing violations of law

428

OPERATIONS (OPS)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OPS) OPS) OBJECTIVE OPS.1 The formality and discipline of operations is adequate to conduct work safely and programs are in place to maintain this formality and discipline. (CR 13) Scope: The Conduct of Operations Program was evaluated during the recent KE Basin FTS ORR and was found to be adequately implemented. Based on this result and the subsequent program enhancements, the scope of the review is to be limited to the SWS operating and maintenance evolutions. Criteria * Programmatic elements of conduct of operations are in place for SWS operations. (DOE Order 5480.19) * The SWS operations personnel adequately demonstrate the principles of conduct of operations requirements during the shift performance period. (DOE Order 5480.19)

430

Microsoft Word - MemoToMr. Gottlieb_DOE_, 20090323.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

X X L L XL Sci-Tech, Inc. 3100 George Washington Way Richland, WA 99354 Science & Technology e-mail: BenPeng@XLSciTech.COM MemoToMr. Gottlieb(DOE), 20090323.doc CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 of 2 Memo From: Ben Peng 3100 George Washington Way eFax: 415-962-0426 Richland, WA 99354 BenPeng@XLSciTech.COM To: Mr. Paul A. Gottlieb Telephone: (202) 586-3439 Office of the Assistant General Counsel for GC-62@hq.doe.gov Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue S.W. Washington, DC 20585 ATTN: TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER QUESTIONS Subject: RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF INQUIRY; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PRACTICES AT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LABORATORIES (73 FR 72036) Date: March. 23, 2009 Dear Mr. Gottlieb: Thank you for the opportunity for XL Sci-Tech as a small business concern to respond to the

431

Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HSW HSW EIS January 2004 1.6 Figure 1.2. States with Radioactive Waste Disposal Activities Final HSW EIS January 2004 1.12 Figure 1.3. Relationship of the HSW EIS to Other Hanford Cleanup Operations, Material Management Activities, and Key Environmental Reviews 2.17 Final HSW EIS January 2004 Figure 2.6. Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Figure 2.7. X-Ray Image of Transuranic Waste Drum Contents M0212-0286.11 HSW EIS 12-10-02 M0212-0286.12 HSW EIS 12-10-02 2.17 Final HSW EIS January 2004 Figure 2.6. Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Figure 2.7. X-Ray Image of Transuranic Waste Drum Contents M0212-0286.11 HSW EIS 12-10-02 M0212-0286.12 HSW EIS 12-10-02 Final HSW EIS January 2004 2.34 Figure 2.18. Typical Liner System Final HSW EIS January 2004 2.36

432

Record of Decision for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site (DOE/EIS-0360) (07/20/04)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

49 49 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Notices halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make recommendations to DOE in the areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities. Tentative Agenda 8 a.m.-Introductions, overview of meeting agenda and logistics (Dave Mosby) 8:15 a.m.-Past year evaluation-Board and stakeholder survey results, what worked, what can be improved (Facilitator) 9:50 a.m.-Break 10:05 a.m.-Past year evaluation continued 10:45 a.m.-Summaries and Q&A on the most important issues to DOE, TN Department of Environment & Conservation, and EPA (Facilitator) 11:30 a.m.-Lunch

433

Hanford Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Cold Vacuum...

434

SUMMARY REPORT ON INSPECTION OF ALLEGATIONSRELATING TO THE ALBUQUERQUE OPERATIONS OFFICESECURITY SURVEY PROCESS AND THE SECURITY OPERATIONSSELF-ASSESSMENTS AT LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY, DOE/IG-0471  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Office of Inspector General received allegations regarding the conduct of security reviews at the Department of Energys (DOE) Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Specifically, it was...

435

DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu June 12, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Geoff Tyree Geoffrey.Tyree@rl.doe.gov 509-376-4171 Who: Secretary of Energy Steven Chu What: Speech to employees, followed by 15-minute media availability When: Friday, June 15, 2012, from 9:30 to 11:00 a.m. Where: Howard Amon Park, Richland, Wash. (park no later than 9:30, assemble near the "Fingernail" stage, right side, look for mult-box) Why: To shoot photos and video of the Energy Secretary speaking to Hanford Site employees and ask the Secretary questions during a media availability following his meeting with employees Audio/Video: Video of the Energy Secretary and Hanford Site employees

436

DOE News Release - DOE Supports USPS Electric Vehicle Testing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

July 12, 2001 DOE Supports USPS Electric Vehicle Testing The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), through its Field Operations Program, is supporting the U.S. Postal Services' (USPS)...

437

Process Intensification of Hydrogen Unit Operations Using an Electrochemical Device - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Glenn Eisman (Primary Contact), Dylan Share, Chuck Carlstrom H2Pump LLC 11 Northway Lane North Latham, NY 12110 Phone: (518) 783-2241 Email: glenn.eisman@h2pumpllc.com DOE Manager HQ: Richard Farmer Phone: (202) 586-1623 Email: Richard.Farmer@ee.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-SC0002185 Subcontractor: PBI Performance Products, Inc., Rock Hill, SC Project Start Date: Phase II: August 15, 2010 Project End Date: August 15, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop and demonstrate a multi-functional hydrogen production technology based on a polybenzimidazole (PBI) membrane which exhibits: High efficiency (70%) * Up to 100 scfh pumping capability * CO * 2 and CO tolerance

438

WR-B-01-01.PDF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 AUDIT REPORT RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE FLEET MANAGEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES JANUARY 2001 February 2, 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGERS, RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE AND OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION FROM: Lawrence R. Ackerly, Regional Manager (Signed) Western Regional Audit Office Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Richland Operations Office Fleet Management" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office and the Office of River Protection (together referred to as "Richland") and the Hanford Site's (Site) prime contractors had a fleet of 1,332 light and heavy motor vehicles as

439

Operation, modification, and maintenance of DOE/PETC 700 H. P. Combustion Test Facility. Quarterly activity report, January 1, 1979--April 1, 1979  

SciTech Connect

Number six fuel oil tests, 30% COM tests, and 40% COM tests were conducted. Operation, modification, and maintenance of the combustion test facility is described. (LTN)

1979-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

DOE/ID-Number  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

54 54 Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Draft November 2013 DOE/EA-1954 Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Draft November 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE Idaho Operations Office ii CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................. v

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Year Four, 104th Congress, 3rd quarter report, January 1, 1995--March 31, 1995. DOE/KEURP Site Operator Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Kansas State University is participating in the Department of Energy`s Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Kansas State is displaying, testing, and evaluating electric or hybrid vehicle technology. This participation will provide organizations an opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

Record of Decision for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, WA (DOE/EIS-0189), 2/26/97  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

693 693 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 1997 / Notices National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board; Meeting AGENCY: National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board; Education. ACTION: Notice of Meeting. SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a forthcoming meeting of the National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board. This notice also describes the functions of the Board. Notice of this meeting is required under Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This document is intended to notify the public of their opportunity to attend. DATE: March 21, 1997. TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. LOCATION: Room 100, 80 F St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20208-7564. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

443

Supplement Analysis of Environmental Effects of Changes in DOE's Preferred Alternative for Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ll\\k/il:l,lrll?llc)l(F':llrll(F''rl:li of spent Nllhxi3a" III,JE!I fiK1''lrll'I!tlle! ., ,.,.. ,.,P d . . u.. . l'< Il!hls'illlsatthe! Iklr'likx'dl siliE!,, lF!,idllll:lllcll:, "\/'ilklslhllilrllgllhclllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIllllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ,{"gq$ql, ~ &)#l) !Siiilll,,lllll IIIP''IIIP"" 111'(ill!!!'llllrlllrllll'(lll!!!lllr'1111'1111 ,[ll~lllll!lllrllllzllll, lll''~lll~l~'!!sli!s f? Il![!!ldl!l $( 111( Iq,f110 :1 1 ,? II 111 4!, Illlllf.,!i, p "t!?l!~~ggiij /,); /($1 Al 11 g I,!$t "1 'TM . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

444

DOE Gives Mission Support Alliance Top Safety Award | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Gives Mission Support Alliance Top Safety Award Gives Mission Support Alliance Top Safety Award DOE Gives Mission Support Alliance Top Safety Award January 27, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Cameron Hardy, DOE January 27, 2012 (509) 376-5365, Cameron.Hardy@rl.doe.gov Deanna Smith, MSA (509) 373-0857, Deanna_L_Smith@rl.gov RICHLAND, Wash. - The Department of Energy (DOE) has awarded contractor Mission Support Alliance (MSA) Star Status in the (DOE) Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) for its mission support services. This status is the highest safety honor a contractor can receive through DOE's VPP Program. The star recognizes MSA's mission support services group for excellence in employee safety and health programs. The program promotes safety and health excellence through cooperative efforts among labor, management, and government at the DOE contractor

445

DOE Standards Actions, January 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Documents Recently Published Documents Recently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: • DOE-STD-1032-92, Guide to Good Practices for Operations Or- ganization and Administration, December 1992, Change No- tice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1033-92, Guide to Good Practices for Operations and Administration Updates Through Required Reading, December 1992, Change No- tice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1034-93, Guide to Good Practices for Timely Or- ders to Operators, March 1993, Change Notice No. 1, Decem- ber 1998. • DOE-STD-1035-93, Guide to Good Practices for Logkeeping, March 1993, Change Notice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1036-93, Guide to Good Practices for Independent Verification, June 1993, Change Notice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1038-93, Guide to Good Practices for Operations Turn-

446

DOE/EIS-0373D; Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Consolidation of Nuclear Operations Related to Production of Radioisotope Power Systems  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

For For additional information or for copies of this Draft EIS, contact: AVAILABILITY OF THE DRAFT CONSOLIDATION EIS Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Timothy A. Frazier, EIS Document Manager NE-50/Germantown Building Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-1290 Telephone: 1-800-919-3706 E-mail: ConsolidationEIS@nuclear.energy.gov This document is available on the Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology's Website (http://consolidationeis.doe.gov) for viewing and downloading. TABLE OF CONTENTS vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet ..................................................................................................................................................................iii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................vii

447

DOE/EA-1570: Final Environmental Assessment for Construction and Operation of Neutrinos at the Main Injector Off-Axis Electron Neutrino Appearance Experiment at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, and St. Louis County, Minnesota  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

70 70 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Environmental Assessment for Construction and Operation of Neutrinos at the Main Injector Off-Axis Electron Neutrino (ν e ) Appearance Experiment (NOvA) at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, and St. Louis County, Minnesota U.S. Department of Energy, Lead Agency Fermi Site Office Batavia, IL U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cooperating Agency St. Paul District St. Paul, MN June 2008 (DOE/EA-1570) NOvA Environmental Assessment June 2008 ii DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any

448

Kansas State University DOE/KEURP Site Operator User Task Force. Year 3, Fourth quarterly report, April 1--June 30, 1994  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This program relates to demonstration use of electric-powered vehicles. KSU has two electric cars (conversion vehicles) from Soleq. Corp., and is purchasing 4 Chevy trucks for conversion. This document discusses the participating groups, program plan, events, vehicles and components, operations, and procurement.

Hague, J.

1994-06-28T23:59:59.000Z

449

DOE News Release - DOE Helps Place Six Electric Ford Ranges at...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

20, 2001 DOE Helps Place Six Electric Ford Rangers at Three National Parks, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and Two National Forests DOE's Field Operations Program has...

450

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Geothermal  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Geothermal Test Facility, California A Oakland Operations Office site geothermalmap The Geothermal Test Facility site was a research laboratory formerly operated under the DOE...

451

Fuel Cell Combined Heat and Power Industrial Demonstration - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Kriston P. Brooks (Primary Contact), Siva P. Pilli, Dale A. King Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352 Phone: (509) 372-4343 Email: kriston.brooks@pnnl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Peter Devlin Phone: (202) 586-4905 Email: Peter.Devlin@ee.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-AC05-76RL01830 Subcontractor: ClearEdge Power, Portland, OR Project Start Date: May 2010 Project End Date: September 2012

452

DOE/EA-1628: Environmental Assessment for Construction and Operation of a Proposed Lignocellulosic Biorefinery, POET Project LIBERTY, LLC. (September 2008)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Notice of Wetlands and Notice of Wetlands Involvement Construction and Operation of a Proposed Lignocellulosic Biorefinery, POET Project LIBERTY, LLC. Emmetsburg, Iowa Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy by September 2008 September 2008 i POET Project LIBERTY - Final EA 9-26-08.doc Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................i Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms............................................................................................................iv 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Background......................................................................................................................................

453

Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (DOE/EIS-0388) (11/29/05)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

90 Federal Register 90 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Nuclear Security Administration Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM AGENCY: Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration. ACTION: Notice of intent. SUMMARY: The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), an agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility (BSL-3 Facility) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in Los Alamos, New Mexico. This EIS is being prepared and considered in accordance

454

Systems Engineering of Chemical Hydride, Pressure Vessel, and Balance of Plant for Onboard Hydrogen Storage - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

34 34 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Jamie D. Holladay (Primary Contact), Kriston P. Brooks, Ewa C.E. Rönnebro, Kevin L. Simmons and Mark R. Weimar. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Blvd Richland, WA 99352 Phone: (509) 371-6692 Email: Jamie.Holladay@pnnl.gov DOE Managers HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov GO: Jesse Adams Phone: (720) 356-1421 Email: Jesse.Adams@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-AC05-76RL01830

455

DOE Online  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fermilab's Science Adventures! Fermilab's Science Adventures! DOE Online K-12 Instructional Resources ed.fnal.gov/doe/ The U.S. Department of Energy is committed to helping educate our nation's next generation of scientists. The following resources help teachers integrate the Internet into K-12 classroom instruction. DOE Labs General Instructional Units Online Resources Lesson Plans General References DOE Laboratory and Facility Education Home Pages (www-ed.fnal.gov/doe/doe_labs.html) Direct links for 27 education Websites at DOE national laboratories and facilities. Online Catalog (www-ed.fnal.gov/trc/library) Fermilab's Teacher Resource Center collection of 10,000+ PreK-12 instructional materials in science, mathematics and technology. Materials include tradebooks, curriculum materials, educational

456

Pacific Northwest Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 Pacific Northwest Site Office Pictured Right: Pacific Northwest Site Office Staff PNSO Staff Photo 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and manage the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) External link in Richland, Washington. PNNL is one of ten Office of Science Laboratories and is a multi-program

457

DOE Technical Standards Program: Online Approved DOE Technical Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Online Approved DOE Technical Standards Online Approved DOE Technical Standards No. 1001 – 2000 No. 3001 – 4000 No. 4001 – 5500 No. 5501 – 6000 No. 6001 – 6500 No. 7501 – 7750 Document Number Range 1001 – 2000 Number Title DOE-HDBK-1001-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Instructors (80 pages) PDF (226 KB) DOE-HDBK-1002-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators (70 pages) PDF (311 KB) DOE-HDBK-1003-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Maintenance Personnel (106 pages) PDF (391 KB) DOE-HDBK-1010-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Classical Physics (142 pages) PDF (1120 KB) DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Electrical Science, Volume 1 of 4 (166 pages) PDF (4255 KB)

458

DOE Site List  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Links Links Central Internet Database CID Photo Banner DOE Site List Site Geo Site Code State Operations Office1 DOE Programs Generating Streams at Site DOE Programs Managing Facilities Associated Data2 Acid/Pueblo Canyons ACPC NM Oak Ridge Waste/Media, Facilities Airport Substation CA Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Hill Communication Site CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Substation CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities AL Complex NM Albuquerque DP Facilities Alba Craft ALCL OH Oak Ridge Facilities Albany Research Center AMRC OR Oak Ridge Facilities Alcova Switchyard WY Western Area Power Administration Facilities Aliquippa Forge ALFO PA Oak Ridge Facilities

459

DOE Cites Bechtel National Incorporated for Price-Anderson Violations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Incorporated for Price-Anderson Incorporated for Price-Anderson Violations DOE Cites Bechtel National Incorporated for Price-Anderson Violations October 4, 2007 - 3:14pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today notified Bechtel National Incorporated (BNI) that it will fine the company $165,000 for violations of the Department's nuclear safety requirements. BNI is the primary design and construction contractor for the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) located at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. The Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) issued today cited a series of violations that occurred during the design and construction of the WTP between October 2001 and February 2006. Violations include failures in quality processes to control design changes, and to ensure vendor-supplied

460

DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu June 12, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Geoff Tyree Geoffrey.Tyree@rl.doe.gov 509-376-4171 Who: Secretary of Energy Steven Chu What: Speech to employees, followed by 15-minute media availability When: Friday, June 15, 2012, from 9:30 to 11:00 a.m. Where: Howard Amon Park, Richland, Wash. (park no later than 9:30, assemble near the "Fingernail" stage, right side, look for mult-box) Why: To shoot photos and video of the Energy Secretary speaking to Hanford Site employees and ask the Secretary questions during a media availability following his meeting with employees Audio/Video: Video of the Energy Secretary and Hanford Site employees

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

DOE Cites Bechtel National Inc. for Price-Anderson Violations | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 15, 2008 - 3:43pm September 15, 2008 - 3:43pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI) for a nuclear safety violation at DOE's Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. BNI is the contractor responsible for the design and construction of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State. The PNOV cites a violation of 10 C.F.R. Part 708, DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program, that prohibits DOE contractors from retaliating against DOE contractor employees who believe they have disclosed information concerning danger to public health or safety. An alleged retaliation was first reported in 2005 by an employee at the Hanford Site who raised

462

Lessons from Iowa : development of a 270 megawatt compressed air energy storage project in midwest Independent System Operator : a study for the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Iowa Stored Energy Park was an innovative, 270 Megawatt, $400 million compressed air energy storage (CAES) project proposed for in-service near Des Moines, Iowa, in 2015. After eight years in development the project was terminated because of site geological limitations. However, much was learned in the development process regarding what it takes to do a utility-scale, bulk energy storage facility and coordinate it with regional renewable wind energy resources in an Independent System Operator (ISO) marketplace. Lessons include the costs and long-term economics of a CAES facility compared to conventional natural gas-fired generation alternatives; market, legislative, and contract issues related to enabling energy storage in an ISO market; the importance of due diligence in project management; and community relations and marketing for siting of large energy projects. Although many of the lessons relate to CAES applications in particular, most of the lessons learned are independent of site location or geology, or even the particular energy storage technology involved.

Holst, Kent (Iowa Stored Energy Plant Agency, Traer, IA); Huff, Georgianne; Schulte, Robert H. (Schulte Associates LLC, Northfield, MN); Critelli, Nicholas (Critelli Law Office PC, Des Moines, IA)

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

463

DOE standard: Radiological control  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed this Standard to assist line managers in meeting their responsibilities for implementing occupational radiological control programs. DOE has established regulatory requirements for occupational radiation protection in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 835 (10 CFR 835), ``Occupational Radiation Protection``. Failure to comply with these requirements may lead to appropriate enforcement actions as authorized under the Price Anderson Act Amendments (PAAA). While this Standard does not establish requirements, it does restate, paraphrase, or cite many (but not all) of the requirements of 10 CFR 835 and related documents (e.g., occupational safety and health, hazardous materials transportation, and environmental protection standards). Because of the wide range of activities undertaken by DOE and the varying requirements affecting these activities, DOE does not believe that it would be practical or useful to identify and reproduce the entire range of health and safety requirements in this Standard and therefore has not done so. In all cases, DOE cautions the user to review any underlying regulatory and contractual requirements and the primary guidance documents in their original context to ensure that the site program is adequate to ensure continuing compliance with the applicable requirements. To assist its operating entities in achieving and maintaining compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835, DOE has established its primary regulatory guidance in the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides. This Standard supplements the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides and serves as a secondary source of guidance for achieving compliance with 10 CFR 835.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Decommissioning of eight surplus production reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Addendum (Final Environmental Impact Statement)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The first section of this volume summarizes the content of the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) and this Addendum, which together constitute the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) prepared on the decommissioning of eight surplus plutonium production reactors at Hanford. The FEIS consists of two volumes. The first volume is the DEIS as written. The second volume (this Addendum) consists of a summary; Chapter 9, which contains comments on the DEIS and provides DOE`s responses to the comments; Appendix F, which provides additional health effects information; Appendix K, which contains costs of decommissioning in 1990 dollars; Appendix L, which contains additional graphite leaching data; Appendix M, which contains a discussion of accident scenarios; Appendix N, which contains errata; and Appendix 0, which contains reproductions of the letters, transcripts, and exhibits that constitute the rec