Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Geoff Tyree, DOE Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

JOBS: HANFORD SITE HANFORD FUNDS (as of April 26, 2010) Allocated Spent to Date DOE Richland Operations Office 1,634,500,000 414,111,226 DOE Office of River Protection...

2

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office - December 2010 Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office - December 2010 December 2010 Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at DOE-Richland Operations Office The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in the Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC) at the Hanford Site. The EM-23 review included selected programs at the Hanford Site that are under the auspices of the DOE Richland Operations Office. Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations

3

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

April 2013 Operational Awareness of a Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)...

4

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2013 April 2013 Operational Awareness of a Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance [HIAR-RL-2013-04-08] The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an onsite operational awareness review of a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) fire protection surveillance. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2013 More Documents & Publications Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project - February 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 201

5

Richland Operations Office technology summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document has been prepared by the Department of Energy`s Environmental Management Office of Technology Development to highlight its research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation activities funded through the Richland Operations Office. Technologies and processes described have the potential to enhance cleanup and waste management efforts.

Not Available

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

6

Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

treatment and the data should be available by the end of next week. * Status Conduct of Operations There have been several small incidents recently where observations of work...

7

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 2011 June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 June 2011 Hanford Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration [HIAR-RL-2011-06-22] The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an operational awareness review of the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011

8

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 June 2011 Hanford Sludge Treatment Project Review [HIAR-RL-2011-06-17] The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project - February 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - August 2011

9

Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland...

10

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Operations Office - November Richland Operations Office - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The onsite review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from August 13 to 17, 2012. The objective of this assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the DOE-RL has developed and employed appropriate methods for oversight of contractor

11

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Richland Operations Office - April 2011 April 2011 Operational Awareness Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project HIAR-RL-2011-04-07 This Independent Activity Report...

12

Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime Contractors Cite Past Year's Cleanup Progress Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime Contractors Cite Past Year's Cleanup Progress January 5, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Hardy, DOE (509) 376-5365 Cameron.Hardy@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office contractors achieved a great deal of cleanup progress at the Hanford Site in 2010. Below are just some of the major accomplishments of our River Corridor, Central Plateau, and Mission Support contractors: River Corridor To date, approximately half of the cleanup in the Hanford Site's 220-square-mile River Corridor is complete. The River Corridor cleanup

13

Independent Oversight Inspection, Richland Operations Office, Office of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Operations Office, Richland Operations Office, Office of River Protection, and Project Hanford Management Contract - November 2006 Independent Oversight Inspection, Richland Operations Office, Office of River Protection, and Project Hanford Management Contract - November 2006 November 2006 Inspection of Classification and Information Control Programs at the Richland Operations Office, Office of River Protection, and Project Hanford Management Contract This report presents the results of inspection activities by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, Office of Security Evaluations in the area of classification and information control (CIC) at the two DOE offices at the Hanford Site-the Richland Operations Office (RL) and the Office of River Protection (ORP)-each of which

14

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - August...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - August 2011 August 2011 Hanford Sludge Treatment Project HIAR-RL-2011-08-25 This Independent Activity Report...

15

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 2011 June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 June 2011 Hanford Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration [HIAR-RL-2011-06-22] The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an operational awareness review of the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project - February 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June

16

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 January 2011 Presentation of Questions Associated With the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (Onsite) Multi-Canister Overpack Cask [ARPT-RL-2011-001] The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, during a site visit from January 10-14, 2011, presented the results of a technical review of the Safety Analysis Report (SAR) for Packaging (Onsite) Multi-Canister Overpack (MCO) Cask HNF-SD-SARP-017, Rev. 3, to DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) representatives. The presentation was supported by a detailed document that discussed the individual questions.

17

Contractor Fee Payments- Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

See the amount of fees earned on EM's major contracts for each evaluated fee period and the total contract to date at the Richland Operations Office on these charts.

18

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- November - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The onsite review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from August 13 to 17, 2012. The objective of this assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the DOE-RL has developed and employed appropriate methods for oversight of contractor

19

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 April 2011 Operational Awareness Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project [HIAR-RL-2011-04-07] The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. On November 17, 2010, a HSS representative participated in a tour of the STP test facility. The HSS representative was also briefed by the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) Project Engineer, the CHPRC STP Design Manager, and the DOE-RL principal support contract engineer. The HSS representative walked down the major components of the

20

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Operations Office and CH2M Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 April 2012 Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to observe and shadow1 a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) assessment of its contractors at the Hanford Site. The HSS reviewer observed the implementation and effectiveness of the DOE-RL assessment of two of the contractors (CHPRC and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) are committed to continuous improvement and will utilize principles of the DOE Environmental Management (DOE-EM) Partnering Policy to enhance teaming to further execute the Plateau Remediation Contract. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement

22

The Hanford Site Richland Operations Office Office of River Protection Office of Science  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Hanford Site Richland Operations Office Office of River Protection Office of Science Plateau;HANFORDSMALLBUSINESSCOUNCIL Richland Operations Office Sally A. Sieracki Small Business Program Manager E-mail: sally.sieracki@rl.doe.gov Web Site: www.hanford.gov/rl Office of River Protection Susan C. Johnson Small Business Program

23

Operational Awareness Rerview of a Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance, April 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance Dates of Activity : 04/08/2013 - 04/11/2013 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an onsite operational awareness review of a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) fire protection surveillance. Result: During the period April 8-11, 2013, an HSS representative participated in DOE-RL tours of various site facilities to review

24

Operational Awareness Rerview of a Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance, April 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance Dates of Activity : 04/08/2013 - 04/11/2013 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an onsite operational awareness review of a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) fire protection surveillance. Result: During the period April 8-11, 2013, an HSS representative participated in DOE-RL tours of various site facilities to review

25

EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 December 24, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. Workers separate a glove box for removal from Hanford’s Plutonium Finishing Plant. Workers separate a glove box for removal from Hanford's Plutonium Finishing Plant. Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. Workers separate a glove box for removal from Hanford's Plutonium Finishing Plant. RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Richland Operations Office's 2013 accomplishments ranged from cleaning up buildings and waste sites to treating a record

26

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and CH2M and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 April 2012 Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to observe and shadow1 a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) assessment of its contractors at the Hanford Site. The HSS reviewer observed the implementation and effectiveness of the DOE-RL assessment of two of the contractors (CHPRC and

27

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CH2M HILL CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) are committed to continuous improvement and will utilize principles of the DOE Environmental Management (DOE-EM) Partnering Policy to enhance teaming to further execute the Plateau Remediation Contract. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement More Documents & Publications CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company

28

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And Mission Support  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mission Mission Support Alliance, LLC Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And Mission Support Alliance, LLC Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement The U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and the Mission Support Alliance, LLC (MSA) are committed to continuous improvement and will partner together to enchance teaming to further execute the Mission Support Contract. This focused partnership is intended to improve the mission of the Hanford Site cleanup, emphasizing project safety, compliance and delivery completed on time and within cost. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And Mission Support Alliance, LLC Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement

29

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

June 13-17, 2011, at the Sludge Treatment Project at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site. The activity consisted of touring project test facilities and reviewing test...

30

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

June 20-22, 2011, at the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site. The activity consisted of observing an operational assessment of the facility's...

31

DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic Telecommunication  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic Telecommunication Capacity in Benton County - Upgrade improves communications at Hanford Site, schools and libraries DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic Telecommunication Capacity in Benton County - Upgrade improves communications at Hanford Site, schools and libraries March 14, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Fiber Optic Broadband Fiber Optic Broadband Media Contact Cameron Salony, 509-376-0402 Cameron.Salony@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, Wash. - The Department of Energy (DOE), city of Richland, and Benton County's Public Utility District (Benton PUD) jointly implemented a high-capacity fiber optic cable in Richland and at the Hanford Site. The project will improve communications throughout the area.

32

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section March 28, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis An aerial view of Hanford’s 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. An aerial view of Hanford's 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. More than 8,000 feet of pipe — part of the 300 Area’s process sewer system — was removed from the 300-15 Waste Site in the north section. More than 8,000 feet of pipe - part of the 300 Area's process sewer

33

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section March 28, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis An aerial view of Hanford’s 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. An aerial view of Hanford's 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. More than 8,000 feet of pipe — part of the 300 Area’s process sewer system — was removed from the 300-15 Waste Site in the north section. More than 8,000 feet of pipe - part of the 300 Area's process sewer

34

Removal of 1,082-Ton Reactor Among Richland Operations Offices 2014 Accomplishments  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

RICHLAND, Wash. Workers with EMs Richland Operations Office and its contractors made progress this year in several areas of Hanford site cleanup that helped protect employees, the public, environment, and Columbia River.

35

Final Environmental Assessment for the Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

562 562 Environmental Assessment Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office Richland, Washington 99352 Final January 2007 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1562 Environmental Assessment S-1 January 2007 Summary Introduction. This Environmental Assessment (EA) provides information and analyses of proposed U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) activities associated with constructing and operating a new Physical Sciences Facility (PSF) complex on DOE property located in Benton County, north of Richland, Washington. The proposed PSF would replace a number of existing research laboratories in the Hanford

36

Audit of the Richland Operations Office Site Characterization Program, IG-0368  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 1995 0, 1995 IG-1 INFORMATION: Report on "Audit of the Richland Operations Office Site Characterization Program" The Secretary BACKGROUND: With its designation as an environmental cleanup site in 1989, the Hanford Site has represented a major activity of the Department of Energy (Department). The final cleanup of this site is estimated to take over 50 years and cost close to $100 billion. Although there are many factors influencing the operations at Hanford, the Department and the Richland Operations Office (Richland) are ultimately responsible for its success. The Department and Richland are responsible for establishing procedures that ensure program goals are accomplished using the most cost-effective methods. DISCUSSION:

37

Environmental Monitoring Plan United States Department of Energy Richland Operations Office. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Environmental Monitoring Plan was prepared for the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Richland Operations Office (RL) to implement the requirements of DOE Order 5400.1. According to the Order, each DOE site, facility, or activity that uses, generates, releases, or manages significant pollutants or hazardous materials shall prepare a written environmental monitoring plan covering two major activities: (1) effluent monitoring and (2) environmental surveillance. The plan is to contain information discussing the rationale and design criteria for the monitoring programs, sampling locations and schedules, quality assurance requirements, program implementation procedures, analytical procedures, and reporting requirements. The plan`s purpose is to assist DOE in the management of environmental activities at the Hanford Site and to help ensure that operations on the site are conducted in an environmentally safe and sound manner.

NONE

1997-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

38

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance- April 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations

39

Report on Inspection of the Performance Based Incentive Program at the Richland Operations Office, IG-0401  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

(8-89) EFG (07-90) United States Government Department of Energy MEMORANDUM DATE: March 10, 1997 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-1 SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on "Inspection of the Performance Based Incentive Program at the Richland Operations Office" TO: The Acting Secretary BACKGROUND: The subject final report is provided for your information. While conducting other inspection work at the Richland Operations Office (Richland), the Office of Inspector General identified the Fiscal Year 1995 Richland Performance Based Incentive (PBI) Program as an area of concern. Specifically, we were unable to identify any

40

DOE/EA-1660: Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Land's Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, WA (07/20/09)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 2009 July 2009 DOE/EA-1660F Environmental Assessment Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 Final Environmental Assessment July 2009 Sum-1 Summary Introduction. This Environmental Assessment (EA) provides information and analyses of proposed U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) activities associated with consolidating existing communications operations and removing excess facilities and infrastructure within the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve (ALE) at the Hanford Site near the City of Richland, Washington. Purpose and Need. To meet long-term federal agency missions, DOE needs to reduce indirect costs and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

DOE Announces Additional Tour Seats Available: Tours of B Reactor at the Hanford Site Begin and End in Richland, Wash.  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

RICHLAND, Wash. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has made additional seats available for tours of the B Reactor National Historic Landmark this July and August.

42

Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes, November 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oversight Review Oversight Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes November 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2

43

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996 Financial Statements, WR-FS-97-04  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE DURING THE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENT S CONSOLIDATED FISCAL YEAR 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its audit reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov

44

Environmental assessment for the resiting, construction, and operation of the Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This environmental assessment (EA) presents estimated environmental impacts from the resiting, construction, and operation of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), which is proposed to be constructed and operated on land near the south boundary of the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. The EMSL, if constructed, would be a modern research facility in which experimental, theoretical, and computational techniques can be focused on environmental restoration problems, such as the chemical and transport behavior of complex mixtures of contaminants in the environment. The EMSL design includes approximately 18,500 square meters (200,000 square feet) of floor space on a 12-hectare (30-acre) site. The proposed new site is located within the city limits of Richland in north Richland, at the south end of DOE`s 300 Area, on land to be deeded to the US by the Battelle Memorial Institute. Approximately 200 persons are expected to be employed in the EMSL and approximately 60 visiting scientists may be working in the EMSL at any given time. State-of-the-art equipment is expected to be installed and used in the EMSL. Small amounts of hazardous substances (chemicals and radionuclides) are expected to be used in experimental work in the EMSL.

Not Available

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

45

Inspection of surveillance equipment and activities at DOE Field Office, Richland  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this inspection was to review surveillance activities by the Department of Energy's (DOE) Field Office, Richland (RL) and contractor employees at the RL Hanford site for efficiency and economy and compliance with laws and regulations. The scope included surveillance activities, procedures, training, types of surveillance equipment, and management controls over the equipment and activities. We also looked at Departmental policies and procedures regarding the equipment and activities. Allegations of illegal surveillance that came to our attention during the course of this inspection were referred to the Department of Justice. As part of our review, inspectors were on-site at RL from February 11, 1991, through March 1, 1991. Follow-up trips to RL were also made in April, May, and June 1991. We also conducted interviews at Albuquerque, Savannah River, and Germantown of former RL employees and RL contractors who were on travel. Officials from DOE's Office of General Counsel (OGC), Office of Security Affairs, and Office of Safeguards and Security (S S) were also interviewed regarding the Department's purchase and possession of wiretapping and eavesdropping devices. We obtained 75 signed sworn statements from 55 individuals during the course of the inspection. 1 fig., 1 tab.

Not Available

1991-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

46

DOE Names New Richland Operations Manager | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

groundwater. Addthis Related Articles EM Office of River Protection (ORP) Manager Kevin Smith, right, discusses the Low-Activity Waste Facility design and construction with Waste...

47

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Richland Operations Office 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance. 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - RL

48

EIS-0063: Waste Management Operations, Double-Shell Tanks for Defense High Level Radioactive Waste Storage, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy developed this statement to evaluate the existing tank design and consider additional specific design and safety feature alternatives for the thirteen tanks being constructed for storage of defense high-level radioactive liquid waste at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. This statement supplements ERDA-1538, "Final Environmental Statement on Waste Management Operation."

49

Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations, April 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oversight Review of Oversight Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations April 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

50

Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations, April 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review of Independent Oversight Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations April 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

51

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance.

52

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland 2 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance.

53

Report on Follow-up Inspection of the Double Funding of Security for Special Nuclear Material at Richland Operations, IG-0378  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 INFORMATION: Report on "Follow-up Inspection of the Double Funding of Security for Special Nuclear Material at the Richland Operations Office" The Secretary BACKGROUND: On June 3, 1993, the Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Inspections issued a Letter Report to the Department's Acting Chief Financial Officer which stated that during Fiscal Year 1993 the Department had requested and received $60 million, double the funding needed, for the safeguard and security of special nuclear material at the Richland Operations Office. In response to that Report, the Acting Chief Financial Officer took control of the funds and placed them into a management reserve account. A follow-up inspection was initiated to:

54

DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order institutes a DOE wide program for the management of operating experience to prevent adverse operating incidents and facilitate the sharing of good work practices among DOE sites. Cancels DOE O 210.2.

2011-04-08T23:59:59.000Z

55

DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order establishes a DOE wide program for management of operating experience to prevent adverse operating incidents and to expand the sharing of good work practices among DOE sites. Canceled by DOE O 210.2A. Does not cancel other directives.

2006-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

56

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

57

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

58

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

59

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

60

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Assessment of the Plutonium Finishing Plant Criticality Alarm System U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

At the request of the Assistant Manager for Safety and Engineering, the U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (RL) Engineering Support Division, performed an oversight review of the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) nuclear Criticality Alarm System (CAS). The review was conducted to satisfy requirements and agreements associated with Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board (DNFSB) Recommendation 2000-2, ''Vital Safety Systems.'' The PFP is managed by Fluor Hanford, Inc. for RL. The field assessment and staff interviews were conducted August 12 through August 19,2002. This was a limited scope assessment that consisted of a review of the nuclear CAS operations, maintenance, and compliance with National Consensus Standards Requirements. The main purpose of the assessment was to determine the adequacy of the existing alarm system and its associated infrastructure to support the PFP facility mission through the remaining facility lifetime. The Review Plan was modeled upon Criteria and Review Approach Documents (CRAD) developed for DNFSB Recommendation 2000-2 reviews conducted across the Hanford Site. Concerns regarding component degradation and failure, increasing numbers of occurrence reports associated with the alarm system, and reliability issues were addressed. Additionally, RL performed a review of the engineering aspects of the CAS including the functions of design authorities and aspects of systems engineering. However, the focus of the assessment was on operations, maintenance, and reliability of the CAS, associated procurement practices, adequacy of safety and engineering policies and procedures, safety documentation, and fundamental engineering practices including training, qualification, and systems engineering. This assessment revealed that the PFP CAS and its associated infrastructure, administrative procedures, and conduct of operations are generally effective. There are no imminent criticality safety issues associated with the operation of the existing CAS. The Assessment Team believes that the CAS, as it presently exists at the PFP facility, is adequate to support the remaining mission lifetime of the facility while continuing to ensure personnel safety. This conclusion is dependent upon a continued level of funding adequate to support the required maintenance and occasional system upgrade. Two findings were identified during this assessment. Additionally, the report identified eight observations and two recommendations. The assessment revealed that recent changes to OSR compliance procedures and other documents do not contain the signature of the CSR as required by procedure. Lack of appropriate approval signatures is a noncompliance with site-level procedures.

NIRIDER, L.T.

2002-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

62

Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

as needed. Work cooperatively with private landowners to develop elk hunting season strategies that will control elk populations and reduce or eliminate damage problems. 2....

63

Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

AT-45-1I-GEN 21 between the Atomic Energy Commission and the Northern Pacific Railway Company dated December 7, 1948. We have conducted a thorough search and were unable to...

64

Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

co ued c m nain 9)73 11iic 6--3lh anlbhrd Site, inadvertentv failed to include EUI 973 as a prop.osed FE-Ol1 deletion in tihe original renewval application. This...

65

Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

direction of the BED. The Incident 15 Command Post (ICP) is managed by either the senior Hanford Fire Department member present or senior 16 Hanford Patrol member present on the...

66

Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

the defect was repaired. The subsequent driver would review the DVIR and inspect the repair. If the driver agrees that defect was repaired, the driver also signs the DVIR as...

67

Microsoft PowerPoint - DOE presentation RL Site_DOE-RL.pptx ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Richland Operations Office Site Report Survey Purpose * DOE tasked EurekaFacts to conduct a Hanford site-wide (federal and contractor) employee survey * Purpose - evaluate current...

68

Enforcement Letter - Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 1997 7, 1997 Mr. H. J. Hatch [ ] Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., H5-20 P.O. Box 1000 Richland, WA 99352-1000 Subject: Noncompliance Numbers NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0001 NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0002 NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0003 Dear Mr. Hatch: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of potential violations of the Quality Assurance Rule (QA Rule) nuclear safety requirements identified in the subject reports. Fluor Daniel Hanford, Incorporated, as Management and Integrating contractor for the DOE's Hanford site, has responsibility for assuring sub-tier contractors comply with its Quality Assurance Plan. On April 27 and 28, 1997, the Office of Enforcement and Investigation personnel met with members of your staff and representatives from Lockheed Martin Hanford Company (LMHC). Our purpose

69

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of September 30, 1995, WR-FS-96-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE DURING THE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENTmS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995

70

DOE limited standard: Operations assessments  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Purpose of this standard is to provide DOE Field Element assessors with a guide for conducting operations assessments, and provide DOE Field Element managers with the criteria of the EM Operations Assessment Program. Sections 6.1 to 6.21 provide examples of how to assess specific areas; the general techniques of operations assessments (Section 5) may be applied to other areas of health and safety (e.g. fire protection, criticality safety, quality assurance, occupational safety, etc.).

NONE

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Import Statement, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COVER SHEET 1 COVER SHEET 1 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office 2 3 TITLE: 4 Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact 5 Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286D2) 6 7 CONTACT: 8 For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy, A6-38 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352-0550 Telephone: (800) 426-4914 Fax: (509) 372-1926 Email: hsweis@rl.gov For further information on the Department's National Environmental Policy Act process, contact: Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, EH-42 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.

72

Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COVER SHEET COVER SHEET U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office TITLE: Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286F) CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy, A6-38 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352-0550 Telephone: (509) 376-6536 Fax: (509) 372-1926 Email: hsweis@rl.gov For further information on the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, contact: Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, EH-42 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.

73

Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Import Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Link to Main Report Link to Main Report RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: COVER SHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office TITLE: Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286D2) CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy, A6-38 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352-0550 Telephone: (800) 426-4914 Fax: (509) 372-1926 Email: hsweis@rl.gov For further information on the Department's National Environmental Policy Act process,

74

Enforcement Letter - Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

24, 2001 24, 2001 Ms. M.P. Delozier [ ] CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. MSIN: H6-08 2440 Stevens Center Richland, WA 99352 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Ms. Delozier: This letter refers to a recent investigation by the Department of Energy (DOE), regarding potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830, "Nuclear Safety Management," occurring at the Hanford Tank Farms. The investigation reviewed three issues that were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. Two of the NTS reports involve the failure to perform the Technical Safety Requirement (TSR) for [ ] gas monitoring. The initial potential noncompliance occurred in January 2000, in which a Zip Cord was installed in a catch tank without first monitoring for [ ]

75

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

June 5, 2013 June 5, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period May 16, through May 30, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC - Shannon Brennan, DOE-ID, (208) 526-3993. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) [No items to Report] Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) May 15 - 30, 2013: CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC discovered three instances of new information at the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) which have the potential to impact the nuclear safety analysis

76

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

January 6, 2014 January 6, 2014 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period November 01, 2013 through November 30, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Nothing to Report Notable Accomplishments: Contracting companies supporting EM's cleanup program and the Office of Nuclear Energy at the Idaho site volunteered to be among the first to use a new DOE

77

Enforcement Letter-Richland-07/31/1998  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 1998 1, 1998 Mr. R. D. Hanson [ ] Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. P.O. Box 1000 MS/H5-20 Richland, WA 99352-1000 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Number NTS-RL--PHMC-PHMCGENL-1998-0003 Dear Mr. Hanson: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding the failure of Fluor Daniel Hanford, Incorporated (FDH) to effectively complete corrective actions for Enforcement Action 96-02 (EA 96-02), although FDH informed the DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) that such work had been completed. 10 CFR 830.120 (c)(1)(iii) (Quality Improvement) mandates processes to detect and prevent quality problems be established and implemented. 10 CFR 830.120 (c)(2)(i) (Work Processes) requires that work be performed to established technical standards

78

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

18, 2013 18, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period September 30, 2013 through October 31, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) October 15, 2013: A manager at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) determined that the AMWTP Safety Analysis process required review due to an operational trend of fire/combustion events in the Treatment Facility (TF) box lines. Safety analysis for the TF is

79

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

26, 2013 26, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period July 29, 2013 through August 12, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) July 31, 2013: The Idaho Treatment Group, LLC (ITG), the managing contractor for the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project received a warning letter from the State of Idaho's Department of Environmental quality regarding self- reported RCRA permit violations which

80

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18, 2013 - 5:11pm Addthis WASHINGON, D. C. - After conducting a rigorous competitive selection process, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations, LLC (team includes members comprised of Parent Company Fluor Federal Services, Inc., of Arlington, Virginia and major subcontractors MRIGlobal of Kansas City, Missouri; Booz Allen Hamilton of Mclean, Virginia; and ASRC Petroleum Operations and Maintenance of Anchorage, Alaska) has been awarded a management and operating contract valued at $1.46 billion to run DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for the Environmental for the Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 1992 U.S. Department of Energy Richland, Washington 99352 Contents 1 . 0 Summary . . 2.0 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action . . . . . . 3.0 Proposed Action and Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 Proposed Action 3.2 Onsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Offsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . 3.4 No Action Alternative ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 Environmental Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 Construction Impacts 5.1.1 Atmospheric Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2 Terrestrial Impacts . 5.1.3 Impacts on CERCLA Remedial Actions . 5.1.4 Construction Accidents .

82

Red Lion Hotel Richland Hanford House Richland, Washington U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lion Hotel Richland Hanford House Lion Hotel Richland Hanford House Richland, Washington U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange April 13 - 14, 2010 Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange 1 Welcome Dear Participant, On behalf of the Department of Energy and the Savannah River National Laboratory, we welcome you to the Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange. Each of you bring a wealth of experience from a variety of different perspectives that will be essential for the effective and compliant imple- mentation of performance and risk assessments in support of tank closure, site operations, and area completion projects. The Performance Assess-

83

Remedial investigation/feasibility study work plan for the 100-KR-4 operable unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Four areas of the Hanford Site (the 100, 200, 300, and 1100 Areas) have been included on the US Environmental Protection Agency`s (EPA`s) National Priorities List (NPL) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). This work plan and the attached supporting project plans establish the operable unit setting and the objectives, procedures, tasks, and schedule for conducting the CERCLA remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) for the 100-KR-4 operable unit. The 100-K Area consists of the 100-KR-4 groundwater operable unit and three source operable units. The 100-KR-4 operable unit includes all contamination found in the aquifer soils and water beneath the 100-K Area. Source operable units include facilities and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of contamination.

Not Available

1992-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

RCRA facility investigation/corrective measures study work plan for the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 200-UP-2 Operable Unit is one of two source operable units at the U Plant Aggregate Area at the Hanford Site. Source operable units include waste management units and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of radioactive and/or hazardous substance contamination. This work plan, while maintaining the title RFI/CMS, presents the background and direction for conducting a limited field investigation in the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit, which is the first part of the process leading to final remedy selection. This report discusses the background, prior recommendations, goals, organization, and quality assurance for the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit Work Plan. The discussion begins with a summary of the regulatory framework and the role of the work plan. The specific recommendations leading into the work plan are then addressed. Next, the goals and organization of the report are discussed. Finally, the quality assurance and supporting documentation are presented.

Not Available

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

85

DOE to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory DOE to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory February 16, 2006 - 11:55am Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that it intends to seek competitive bids for the management and operations contract for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, Washington. The current five-year contract expires September 30, 2007. "The competitive process is the best method to provide the American taxpayer an optimum management team for PNNL, one of our outstanding national laboratories," Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director of the DOE Office of Science, said. Battelle Memorial Institute, a non-profit organization based in Columbus,

86

Remedial investigation/feasibility study work plan for the 100-BC-2 operable unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This work plan and attached supporting project plans establish the operable unit setting and the objectives, procedures, tasks, and schedule for conducting the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) for the 100-BC-2 operable unit in the 100 Area of the Hanford Site. The 100 Area is one of four areas at the Hanford Site that are on the US Environmental Protection Agency`s (EPA) National Priorities List under CERCLA. The 100-BC-2 operable unit is one of two source operable units in the 100-B/C Area (Figure ES-1). Source operable units are those that contain facilities and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of hazardous substance contamination. The 100-BC-2 source operable unit contains waste sites that were formerly in the 100-BC-2, 100-BC-3, and 100-BC-4 operable units. Because of their size and geographic location, the waste sites from these two operable units were added to 100-BC-2. This allows for a more efficient and effective investigation of the remaining 100-B/C Reactor area waste sites. The investigative approach to waste sites associated with the 100-BC-2 operable unit are listed in Table ES-1. The waste sites fall into three general categories: high priority liquid waste disposal sites, low priority liquid waste disposal sites, and solid waste burial grounds. Several sites have been identified as candidates for conducting an IRM. Two sites have been identified as warranting additional limited field sampling. The two sites are the 116-C-2A pluto crib, and the 116-C-2C sand filter.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 22, 2011 August 22, 2011 CX-006835: Categorical Exclusion Determination 241-T Tank Farm Debris Barrier Fence CX(s) Applied: B1.11 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office, Golden Field Office August 11, 2011 CX-006490: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bat Roost Tower Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.20 Date: 08/11/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 28, 2011 CX-006063: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Firebreak Maintenance on the Hanford Site During Calendar Year 2011 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006092: Categorical Exclusion Determination

88

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Isolation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant April 20, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Bill Taylor Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center (803) 952-8564 Deb Gill U.S. DOE Carlsbad Field Office (575) 234-7270 CARLSBAD, N.M. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC (members comprised of URS Energy & Construction, Inc., of Boise, Idaho, and Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Group, Inc., of Lynchburg, Virginia, and Major Subcontractor, AREVA Federal Services LLC, of Bethesda, Maryland) has been awarded a $1.3 billion contract for management and operating (M&O) at DOE's Waste

89

Richland Environmental Restoration Project management action process document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A critical mission of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is the planning, implementation, and completion of environmental restoration programs at DOE facilities. An integral part of this mission involves the safe and cost-effective environmental restoration of the Hanford Site. For over 40 years the Hanford Site supported United States national defense programs, largely through the production of nuclear materials. One legacy of historical Hanford Site operations is a significant waste inventory of radioactive and/or regulated chemical materials. Releases of these materials have, in some cases, contaminated the Hanford Site environment. The DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) is responsible for protecting human health and the environment from potential Hanford Site environmental hazards by identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks posed by contaminated sites.

NONE

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of...

91

DOE High Performance Computing Operational Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HPCOR DOE High Performance Computing Operational Review (HPCOR) All logos Enabling Data-Driven Scientific Discovery at HPC Facilities June 18-19, 2014 California State University,...

92

Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

"To provide requirements and guidelines for Departmental Elements, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), to use in developing directives, plans, and/or procedures relating to the conduct of operations at DOE facilities. The implementation of these requirements and guidelines should result in improved quality and uniformity of operations. Change 2, 10-23-2001. Canceled by DOE O 422.1.

1990-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

93

DOE Headquarters Contact Information: Employee Concerns Program...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

susan.sparks@lex.doe.gov Princeton Site Office Leif Dietrich 609-243-3759 ldietrich@pppl.gov Richland Operations Office Roger Gordon Bonnie Lazor Phone: 509-376-0000...

94

DOE Oak Ridge Operations managers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Oak Ridge Operations managers As the last few articles have shown, the period immediately following the end of World War II was one of constant and continuing change for Oak Ridge....

95

DOE Issues Request for Proposals for Hanford Site Occupational Medical Services  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

RICHLAND, Wash. The Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for an Occupational Medical Services contract at the Hanford Site. The solicitation is for a small-business contractor to perform occupational medical services for the DOE Richland Operations Office and Office of River Protection.

96

DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator Training System for Supercritical Coal Power Plants DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator Training System for Supercritical Coal Power Plants December 10, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - A new U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) cooperative research and development agreement to develop, test, and deploy a dynamic simulator and operator training system (OTS) could eventually help commercialize important carbon capture technologies at the nation's power plants. The high-fidelity, real-time OTS for a generic supercritical once-through (SCOT) pulverized-coal power plant will be installed at the National Energy Technology Laboratory's (NETL's) Advanced Virtual Energy Simulation

97

Enforcement Letter-Richland-09/22/1995  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 1995 2, 1995 NTS No. NTS-RL-WHC-BPLANT-1995-0001 Westinghouse Hanford Corporation ATTN: D.J. Swaim [ ] P.O. Box 1970 MSIN: B3-51 Richland, WA 99352 Dear Sirs: Subject: Noncompliance with 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at B Plant/Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Hanford B Plant/Waste Encapsulation Facility (WESF). These potential noncompliances were identified by WHC on May 8, 1995, during a self-initiated comprehensive assessment of the facilities Operational Safety Requirements (OSR) program and reported to DOE on May 24, 1995.

98

EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of expansion or continued use of existing sand and gravel pits located on the Hanford Site (Pits F, H, N, 6, 9, 18, 21, 23, 24, 30, and 34) and establishing one new borrow area source in the 100 Area for ongoing construction activities and fill material following remediation activities. The scope of this EA does not include borrow sources for silt-loam material. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 15, 2013 EA-1934: Mitigation Action Plan Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

99

EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, 4: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of expansion or continued use of existing sand and gravel pits located on the Hanford Site (Pits F, H, N, 6, 9, 18, 21, 23, 24, 30, and 34) and establishing one new borrow area source in the 100 Area for ongoing construction activities and fill material following remediation activities. The scope of this EA does not include borrow sources for silt-loam material. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 15, 2013 EA-1934: Mitigation Action Plan Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

100

Environmental Assessment K Pool 'Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOERA-1 11 1 DOERA-1 11 1 Environmental Assessment K Pool 'Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Emrgy Richland, Washington December 1996 DOEEA-1111 ENVIRONMJ3'NTAL ASSESSMENT K POOL 'F'ISH REARING HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RICHLAND, WASHINGTON December 1996 This page intentionally left blank. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. 1 ' U.S. Department of Energy summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has a need to respond to a request to lease facilities at the Hanford Site 100-KE and 100-KW filter plant pools (K Pools) for fish rearing activities. These fish rearing activities would be: (1) business ventures with public h

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

DOE/EA-1728-F Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8-F 8-F Environmental Assessment Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 DOE/EA-1728-F 1 2 3 4 5 6 This page intentionally left blank. 7 8 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1728-F Final Environmental Assessment iii February 2012 CONTENTS 1 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 3 1.1 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT DETERMINATION 4 RECOMMENDATION ...................................................................................................... 1 5 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION ........................................................... 1 6

102

Richland Environmental Restoration Project management action process document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the prescribed means for providing direct input to the US Department of Energy Headquarters regarding the status, accomplishments, strategy, and issues of the Richland Environmental Restoration Project. The project mission, organizational interfaces, and operational history of the Hanford Site are provided. Remediation strategies are analyzed in detail. The document includes a status of Richland Environmental Restoration project activities and accomplishments, and it presents current cost summaries, schedules, and technical baselines.

NONE

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Richland/Office of River Protection | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland/Office of River Protection Richland/Office of River Protection Richland/Office of River Protection Below are compliance agreements and accompanying summaries for the Richland Operations Office and Office of River Protection at the Hanford site. Settlement Agreement re: Washington v. Bodman, January 6, 2006 Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 Summary Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 Summary Tank Stabilization September 30, 1999 Tank Stabilization September 30, 1999 Summary U.S. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement for the Hanford Site, February 7, 1994 U.S. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement for the Hanford Site, February

104

Microsoft Word - DOE-CX-00013 Biological Sampling at WMA C Signed...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

The U.S. Department of Energy, (DOE) Office of River Protection (ORP) and the Richland Operations Office (RL) propose to conduct trapping and sampling of small mammals near...

105

Notice of Intent To Prepare the Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA (DOE/EIS-0391) (2/2/06)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 Federal Register 5 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 22 / Thursday, February 2, 2006 / Notices addressed as follows: Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability (Mail Code OE-20), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0350 (FAX 202-586-5860). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Russell (Program Office) 202-586- 9624 or Michael Skinker (Program Attorney) 202-586-2793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exports of electricity from the United States to a foreign country are regulated and require authorization under section 202(e) of the Federal Power Act (FPA) (16 U.S.C. 824a(e)). On December 14, 2005, the Department of Energy (DOE) received an application from MAG E.S. to transmit electric energy from the United States to Canada. MAG E.S. is a Canadian

106

EIS-0467: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE announces its intent to prepare an EIS for the Acquisition of a Natural Gas Pipeline and Natural Gas Utility Service at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (Natural Gas Pipeline or NGP EIS), and initiate a 30-day public scoping period.

107

Richland Kiwanis Foundation Scholarship Grant Program  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Richland Kiwanis Foundation Scholarship Grant Program Eligible Students The Richland Kiwanis Foundation provides one-year grants to deserving students whose ability to obtain post- secondary education. _______________________________________________________________________ Description of Grants Richland Kiwanis Scholarships: Three grants will be awarded for the 2012-13 school year

Collins, Gary S.

108

DOE News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SMALL BUSINESS SYMPOSIUM TO LINK LOCAL COMPANIES WITH HANFORD CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at the Hanford...

109

EIS-0391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, Washington |  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, 391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, Washington EIS-0391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, Washington Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts for the following three key areas: (1) retrieval, treatment, and disposal of waste from 149 single-shell tanks (SSTs) and 28 double-shell tanks and closure of the SST system, (2) decommissioning of the Fast Flux Test Facility, a nuclear test reactor, and (3) disposal of Hanford's waste and other DOE sites' low-level and mixed low-level radioactive waste. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download December 13, 2013 EIS-0391: Record of Decision Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for

110

Environmental Protection, Safety, and Health Protection Program for DOE Operations  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Order establishes the Environmental Protection, Safety. and Health Protection Program for Department of Energy (DOE) operations. Cancels DOE 5480.1, dated 5-5-1980, its chapters are not canceled. Canceled by DOE O 5480.1B

1981-08-13T23:59:59.000Z

111

EIS-0467: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA 7: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA EIS-0467: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA Summary This EIS will evaluate the environmental impacts of a proposal to enter into a contract with a licensed natural gas supplier in Washington State to construct, operate, and maintain a natural gas pipeline. The pipeline would deliver natural gas to support the Waste Treatment Plant and the 242-A Evaporator operations in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Site. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. For more information, contact: Mr. Douglas Chapin, NEPA Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550, MSIN A5-11 Richland, WA 99352 Documents Available for Download January 23, 2012 EIS-0467: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and

112

EA-1178: 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

78: 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, 78: 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1178: 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for a proposed energy conservation measure for a number of buildings in the 300 Area of the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site. The proposed action includes replacing the centralized heating system with heating units for individual buildings or groups of buildings, constructing new natural gas pipelines to provide a source for many of these units and constructing a central control building to operate and maintain the system. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 12, 1997 EA-1178: Finding of No Significant Impact

113

Town of Richland | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Richland Richland Jump to: navigation, search Name Town of Richland Facility Town of Richland Sector Wind energy Facility Type Small Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Sustainable Energy Development Energy Purchaser Town of Richland Location Richland NY Coordinates 43.56504687°, -76.03708506° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":43.56504687,"lon":-76.03708506,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

114

CRAD, DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility CRAD, DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility January 2005 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a DOE independent oversight assessment of the Y-12 Site Office's programs for oversight of its contractors at the Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, DOE Oversight - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility More Documents & Publications

115

EA-1728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, 728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts from vegetation management in the "project area" of the Hanford Site. The project area excludes most of the Hanford Reach National Monument that is managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) under permit from DOE. Vegetation managment under the EA would be consistent with and complement similar efforts currently being performed by the USFWS on the Monument. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA, and that preparation of

116

EA-1728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

28: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, 28: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1728: Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts from vegetation management in the "project area" of the Hanford Site. The project area excludes most of the Hanford Reach National Monument that is managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) under permit from DOE. Vegetation managment under the EA would be consistent with and complement similar efforts currently being performed by the USFWS on the Monument. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA, and that preparation of

117

Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Cross-referenced to DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations. Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Cross-referenced to DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations. This is an open-book evaluation. Complete the questions, and submit your answers (hand-written or electronically) to the Training Center. Someone will check and grade your answers. If you achieve a score of at least 80%, you will receive a completion certificate. Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide Review Questions More Documents & Publications U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals, Self-Study Guide

118

DOE Selects ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy Laboratory DOE Selects ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy Laboratory July 29, 2008 - 2:40pm Addthis...

119

Protection Program Operations - DOE Directives, Delegations,...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Operations by jcronin Functional areas: Physical Protection, Protective Force, Safeguards, Security, and Emergency Management The Order establishes requirements for the...

120

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5, 2012 5, 2012 CX-009658: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009657: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009656: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facility Safety

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

EA-1562: Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

562: Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility 562: Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington EA-1562: Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of DOE proposed activities associated with constructing and operating a new Physical Sciences Facility (PSF) complex on DOE property located in Benton County, north of Richland, Washington. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD June 14, 2013 EA-1562-SA-1: Supplement Analysis Final Environmental Assessment of Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland,

122

Microsoft Word - DOE-EA-1707D_Revised_Predecisional_EA Closure_NRDWL-SWL08232011.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7D 7D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT AUGUST 2011 Environmental Assessment Closure of Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill (NRDWL) and Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 DOE/EA-1707D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT AUGUST 2011 DOE/EA-1707D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT iii AUGUST 2011 Contents 1 1 Introduction and Purpose and Need ............................................................................................. 1-1 2 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 3 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................... 1-2 4

123

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

422.1 422.1 CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS DOE O 422.1 Conduct of Operations Familiar Level June 2011 1 June 2011 DOE O 422.1 CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What is the purpose of DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations? 2. What are the typical methods of implementing DOE O 422.1 guidelines? 3. What are the specific requirements as described in attachment 2 of DOE O 422.1? 4. How do the DOE Technical Standards support the specific requirements in DOE O 422.1 Note: If you think that you can complete the practice at the end of this level without working through the instructional material and/or the examples, complete the practice

124

Annual Energy Consumption Analysis Report for Richland Middle School  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Richland Middle School is a single story, 90,000 square feet new school located in Richland, WA. The design team proposed four HVAC system options to serve the building. The proposed HVAC systems are listed as following: (1) 4-pipe fan coil units served by electrical chiller and gas-fired boilers, (2) Ground-source closed water loop heat pumps with water loop heat pumps with boiler and cooling tower, and (3) VAV system served by electrical chiller and gas-fired boiler. This analysis estimates the annual energy consumptions and costs of each system option, in order to provide the design team with a reasonable basis for determining which system is most life-cycle cost effective. eQuest (version 3.37), a computer-based energy simulation program that uses the DOE-2 simulation engine, was used to estimate the annual energy costs.

Liu, Bing

2003-12-18T23:59:59.000Z

125

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14, 2012 14, 2012 CX-009693: Categorical Exclusion Determination CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring, December 2012 to December 2013 CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009692: Categorical Exclusion Determination CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Cleanup Actions, December 2012 to December 2013 CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009673: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington

126

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012 CX-007980: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 13, 2012 CX-007979: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.17 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 13, 2012 CX-007978: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington

127

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- June 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 Site Visit Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW - August 2011...

128

Richland Community College | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Richland Community College Richland Community College Jump to: navigation, search Name Richland Community College Facility Richland Community College Sector Wind energy Facility Type Small Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Location Decatur IL Coordinates 39.88666061°, -88.89538586° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.88666061,"lon":-88.89538586,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

129

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site May 29, 2008 - 12:51pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), LLC has been selected as the tank operations contractor to store, retrieve and treat Hanford tank waste and close the tank farms at DOE's Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $7.1 billion over ten years (a five-year base period with options to extend it for up to five years). WRPS is a limited liability company comprised of Washington Group

130

DOE-STD-3006-95; DOE Standard Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3006-95 3006-95 November 1995 SUPERSEDING DOE-STD-3006-93 November 1993 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-3006-95 i PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) FOREWORD 1. DOE 0 425.1 establishes the requirement to conduct Operational Readiness Reviews

131

DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances December 20, 2005 - 11:44am Addthis DOE finds emergency; determines plant will help electric reliability WASHINGTON, D.C. - Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman today issued an order requiring Mirant Corporation's Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia (Mirant) to immediately resume limited operation. The order will help provide electric reliability for Washington, D.C., and will do so at the lowest reasonable impact to the environment. "After weighing all of the information, I believe an emergency situation exists, and that issuance of this order is in the public interest. This order will provide the level of electricity reliability necessary to keep

132

DOE Office of Science Computing Facility Operational Assessment...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Physics Lab NUG Meeting, 17 Sep 2007 Objective * The DOE Office of Science is required to conduct an Operational Assessment (OA) Review of the efficiencies in the steady-state...

133

Operating Experience Level 3, DOE Occupational Radiation Exposures for 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Operating Experience Level 3 (OE-3) document provides an overview summary of radiation doses from occupational exposures at the Department of Energy (DOE), including the National Nuclear Security Administration for the year 2013.

134

Environmental Protection, Safety, and Health Protection Program for DOE Operations  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This order establishes the Environmental Protection, Safety, and Health Protection Program for Department of Energy (DOE) operations. Cancels Interim Management Directive No. 5001, Safety, Health And Environmental Protection dated 9-29-77.

1980-05-05T23:59:59.000Z

135

VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM ONSITE REVIEW, Fluor Federal Services Richland, Washington February 26- March 2, 2001  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report summarizes the results of the HSS DOE-VPP Teams evaluation of Fluor Federal Services Richland, Washington during the period of February 26 - March 2, 2001, and provides the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer with the necessary information to make the final decision regarding the companys continued participation in DOE-VPP as a Star site.

136

NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations - DOE Directives...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations by Diane Johnson The objective of this Order is to define the requirements for establishing and implementing Conduct of...

137

DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-05-3: Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman today issued an order requiring Mirant Corporation's Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia (Mirant) to immediately resume limited operation. The order will help provide electric reliability for Washington, D.C., and will do so at the lowest reasonable impact to the environment. DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances More Documents & Publications Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan

138

Red Lion Hotel Richland Hanford House Richland, Washington U...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of performance and risk assessments in support of tank closure, site operations, and area completion projects. The Performance Assess- ment Community of Practice is viewed as a key...

139

Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Cross-referenced to DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations. Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct...

140

EA-1915: Conveyance of Approximately 1,641 Acres of Unimproved Land to the Tri-City Development Council, the Local Community Reuse Organization, Richland, WA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EA will evaluate the environmental impacts of conveyance of approximately 1,641 acres of unimproved land at DOEs Hanford Site, Richland, Washington to the Tri-City Development Council (TRIDEC), the local community reuse organization (CRO).

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

DOE-EM-STD-5505-96; DOE Limited Standard Operations Assessments  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM-STD-5505-96 EM-STD-5505-96 May 1996 DOE LIMITED STANDARD OPERATIONS ASSESSMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA OPER Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009462 DOE-EM-STD-5505-96 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy limited standard is approved for use by all DOE-EM field components. 2. Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, deletions) and any pertinent data that

142

Operations Jim Irby MIT-PSFC DoE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Operations Operations Jim Irby MIT-PSFC DoE Quarterly 4/28/2005 Outline * Machine status and run statistics * Cryopump Development * Status of other projects * Short term plans DoE Quarterly 4/28/2005 Machine Status and Run Statistics History * C-Mod resumed plasma operation on Feb 4 th 2005 * Number of discharges so far this campaign: 684 * Startup reliability including plasma conditioning period: 75% * Startup reliability last two weeks: 87% Major Tasks * Moly/BN comparison * Commissioning of lower hybrid system * Commissioning of Long Pulse DNB DoE Quarterly 4/28/2005 Status * Pre-boronization run period complete * Vessel is now boronized with very low H/(H+D) * Lower hybrid and DNB commissioning ongoing (detailed talks to follow) * 6.75 weeks of our 17 week campaign have been completed - C-Mod Runs

143

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site May 29, 2008 - 12:51pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), LLC has been selected as the tank operations contractor to store, retrieve and treat Hanford tank waste and close the tank farms at DOE's Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $7.1 billion over ten years (a five-year base period with options to extend it for up to five years). WRPS is a limited liability company comprised of Washington Group

144

EIS-0189: Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS), Richland, WA (Programmatic)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This environmental impact statement evaluates the Department of Energy (DOE)'s, in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), decisions on how to properly manage and dispose of Hanford Site tank waste and encapsulated cesium and strontium to reduce existing and potential future risk to the public, Site workers, and the environment. The waste includes radioactive, hazardous, and mixed waste currently stored in 177 underground storage tanks, approximately 60 other smaller active and inactive miscellaneous underground storage tanks (MUSTs), and additional Site waste likely to be added to the tank waste, which is part of the tank farm system. In addition, DOE proposes to manage and dispose of approximately 1,930 cesium and strontium capsules that are by-products of tank waste. The tank waste and capsules are located in the 200 Areas of the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington.

145

DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances DOE Orders Mirant Power Plant to Operate Under Limited Circumstances December 20, 2005 - 11:44am Addthis DOE finds emergency; determines plant will help electric reliability WASHINGTON, D.C. - Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman today issued an order requiring Mirant Corporation's Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia (Mirant) to immediately resume limited operation. The order will help provide electric reliability for Washington, D.C., and will do so at the lowest reasonable impact to the environment. "After weighing all of the information, I believe an emergency situation exists, and that issuance of this order is in the public interest. This order will provide the level of electricity reliability necessary to keep

146

U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1728-F Final Environmental Assessment F-1 February 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/EA-1728-F DOE/EA-1728-F Final Environmental Assessment F-1 February 2012 APPENDIX F FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR INTEGRATED VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ON THE HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON (DOE/EA-1728) AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY An Environmental Assessment (EA) for Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (DOE/EA-1728) has been prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA); the Council on Environmental Quality's Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations [CFR], Parts 1500-1508); and DOE's National Environmental Policy Act Implementing

147

DOE Community Transition Contacts | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

About Us » Contact Us » DOE Community Transition Contacts About Us » Contact Us » DOE Community Transition Contacts DOE Community Transition Contacts Headquarters David Geiser, Director Office of Legacy Management, LM-1 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 (202) 586-8324 (202) 586-8403 (FAX) david.geiser@hq.doe.gov Field HANFORD Colleen French U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 A7-75 Richland, WA 99352 (509) 373-5985 (509) 373-1563 (FAX) colleen_c_french@rl.gov IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY Jacqie Gernant, Program Manager National Security/Technology Partnership Division 2525 Fremont Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83415 (208) 526-1742 (208) 526-0727 (FAX) gernanja@id.doe.gov MOUND Jane Powell Office of Legacy Management, LM-20 U.S. Department of Energy 10995 Hamilton-Cleves Highway

148

DOE Employment - Hanford Site  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

| Print Print Page |Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size USA JOBS ONLINE All vacancies for the Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL) or Office of River...

149

EIS-0364: Decommissioning of the Fast Flux Test Facility, Hanford Site, Richland, WA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), on proposed decommissioning of the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington.

150

Enforcement Letter-Richland-07/06/1995  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 1995 6, 1995 NTS No. NTS-RL--WHC-PUREX-1995-0001 Westinghouse Hanford Corporation ATTN: Mr. Ronald J. Bliss [ ] P.O. Box 1970 MSIN: B3-04 Richland, WA 99350 Subject: Noncompliance with 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility Gentlemen: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) investigation of an event that occurred between February 22-March 7, 1995, at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility (PUREX) at DOE's Hanford site. The event, which involved the cutting of a highly contaminated canyon exhaust air sampling probe as part of waste disposal activities without adequate management controls, resulted in your decision to

151

Microsoft Word - doe_EIS_0245F-SA-03_080411a.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5F-SA-03 5F-SA-03 Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 August 2011 DOE/EIS-0245F-SA-03 iii Summary 1 This supplement analysis (SA) has been prepared to allow a determination by the U.S. Department of 2 Energy (DOE) on whether further National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) review is needed 3 as DOE continues to manage spent nuclear fuel (SNF), including knockout pot (KOP) product material, in 4 multi-canister overpacks (MCOs) at the Hanford Site's Canister Storage Building (CSB). 5 In January 1996, the DOE issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (K Basins FEIS) on 6

152

E-Print Network 3.0 - area richland washington Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

BUSINESS CENTER Summary: Richland (Sandhill REC) Charleston Charleston Charleston Cherokee Spartanburg... Kershaw Richland (Sandhill REC) Florence Florence Florence (Pee Dee...

153

Order Module--DOE Order 422.1, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Order Module--DOE Order 422.1, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS Order Module--DOE Order 422.1, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS The general approach to implementing DOE O 422.1 is for contractors to...

154

Richland, Mississippi: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Richland, Mississippi: Energy Resources Richland, Mississippi: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 32.2390366°, -90.1584206° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":32.2390366,"lon":-90.1584206,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

155

Richland Electric Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Richland Electric Coop Richland Electric Coop Place Wisconsin Utility Id 15983 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location MRO NERC MRO Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Ag-Residential Service Residential Controlled Air-Conditioner Credit Residential Controlled Water Heater Credit Residential Duel Fuel Rate Large Agricultural Demand Management Rate Commercial Large Commercial Industrial Service- Contracted Service Commercial Large Commercial and Industrial Demand Management Rate Commercial Large Commercial- Industrial Service Commercial

156

Impact of DOE Orders on Waste Management Operation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Department of Energy Orders are the internal documents which govern the management of all Department of Energy facilities and operations. DOE Orders are the vehicles by which Federal and state laws and regulations are applied to Department of Energy activities. A selected set of 22 Department of Energy Orders was reviewed to identify the applicability and impact of each Order on waste management operations at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Of the 22 Orders reviewed, five set forth requirements which have a high degree of impact on waste management activities. Eight Orders have a moderate degree of impact on waste management activities, and the remaining nine Orders have a low degree of impact.

Klein, R.B.; Jennrich, E.A.; Shuman, R.; Sandquist, G.M. (Rogers and Associates Engineering Corp., Salt Lake City, UT (United States)); Rutz, A.C.; Littleton, M.W.; McCauce, C.H. (Wastren, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States))

1989-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 CHAPTER 2 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR OPERATIONAL CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT This guidance is appropriate for high-hazard facilities expected to operate for an extended period. Since DOE facilities vary in hazard level and circumstances of operation, a graded approach to implementation should be adopted. 2.1 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ELEMENT The program management element of a configuration management (CM) program coordinates program development and implementation and ensures overall program effectiveness. This element leads the development of the other CM program elements. Development of an effective CM program should be initiated promptly, where needed, to address known issues, to improve compliance with various DOE Orders, and to produce the benefits of improved safety, reduced errors, and increased efficiency.

158

Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts 70.4_Cooperative_Audit_Strategy_0.pdf 70.5_Contractor_Compensation_-_Variable_Pay_1.pdf 70.7_Introduction_1.pdf 70.7_ch2_Environment,_Safety_and_Health_1.pdf 70.7_ch3_Contractor_Human_Resource_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch4_Security_1.pdf 70.7_ch5_Performance_Measurement_and_Assessment_1.pdf 70.7_ch6_Patent_and_Data_Rights_1.pdf 70.7_ch7_Financial_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch8_Business_and_Contract_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch10_Subcontract_Management_3.pdf 70.7_ch11_Real_Property,_Personal_Property_and_Transportation_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch12_Diversity_Plan,_EEO_and_Small_Business_1.pdf 70.7_appB_Related_Internet_Web_Sites_1.pdf 70.7_appC_Contractor_Purchasing_System_Reviews_Risk_Assessment_Matrix_1.pdf

159

Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts 0 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts 70.4_Cooperative_Audit_Strategy_0.pdf 70.5_Contractor_Compensation_-_Variable_Pay_1.pdf 70.7_Introduction_1.pdf 70.7_ch2_Environment,_Safety_and_Health_1.pdf 70.7_ch3_Contractor_Human_Resource_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch4_Security_1.pdf 70.7_ch5_Performance_Measurement_and_Assessment_1.pdf 70.7_ch6_Patent_and_Data_Rights_1.pdf 70.7_ch7_Financial_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch8_Business_and_Contract_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch10_Subcontract_Management_3.pdf 70.7_ch11_Real_Property,_Personal_Property_and_Transportation_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch12_Diversity_Plan,_EEO_and_Small_Business_1.pdf 70.7_appB_Related_Internet_Web_Sites_1.pdf 70.7_appC_Contractor_Purchasing_System_Reviews_Risk_Assessment_Matrix_1.pdf

160

EA-1860: Richland Renewable Energy Waste-to-Energy Project, Richland, Wisconsin  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE is preparing a draft Environmental Assessment to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed construction and operation of a new wastewater treatment facility and the alternative of not implementing this project.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-93-Pt.2 3-93-Pt.2 November 1993 DOE STANDARD GUIDE FOR OPERATIONAL CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Including the Adjunct Programs of Design Reconstitution and Material Condition and Aging Management PART ll U.S. Department of Energy AREA CMAN Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution Is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. Order No. DE94005408 i CONTENTS FOREWORD .

162

DOE_CX-00032_-_%5B1104270743%5D.pdf  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

32 32 CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A DILUENTS/FLUSH SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED FACILITY, AND AN INSTRUMENTATION, CONTROL, AND ELECTRICAL FACILITY AT THE 241-AW AND 241-AY/AZ TANK FARMS, 200 EAST AREA, HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON Proposed Action The U.S. Department of Energy, (DOE) Office of River Protection (ORP) and the Richland Operations Office (RL) propose to construct and operate a DiluentslFlush system (DFS) and associated facility, as well as an Instrumentation, Control, and Electrical (ICE) facility at the 241-AW and 241-AY/AZ Tank Farms. Location of Action The work will take place within the 200 East Area, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Description of Proposed Action The 241-AW and 241-AY/AZ tank farms require the construction and subsequent operation of electrical

163

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 1, 2011 March 1, 2011 CX-005367: Categorical Exclusion Determination Project T-222 Hazardous Materials Management Emergency Response (HAMMER) Training Facility Water Main Extension for Fire Protection CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.15 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office March 1, 2011 CX-005366: Categorical Exclusion Determination Herbicide Applications Along Gravel and Paved Roads on the Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 31, 2011 CX-005190: Categorical Exclusion Determination Project L-691, 200 West Area Sanitary Sewage Lagoon CX(s) Applied: B1.26 Date: 01/31/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office

164

O:\\HR8PROJS\\COMMON\\FIELDMAN\\FMC Operations\\451-EH-02 DOE P 454...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DOE uses institutional controls as components in - * protection of waste disposal operations, * conduct of normal operations and site security, * maintenance of storage...

165

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

85 85 CHAPTER 4 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR MATERIAL CONDITION AND AGING MANAGEMENT This guidance is appropriate for high-hazard facilities expected to operate for an extended period. Since DOE facilities vary in hazard level and circumstances of operation, a graded approach to implementation should be adopted. As shown in Figure 4-1, Material Condition and Aging Management (MCA) activities are developed and implemented in three distinct phases: a preliminary phase, a detailed or main phase, and an ongoing phase. The preliminary MCA phase includes activities necessary to estimate the facility remaining lifetime and to develop the MCA program plan. The detailed MCA phase builds on the preliminary estimate of facility remaining lifetime with more rigorous evaluations of aging degradation mechanisms

166

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

61 61 CHAPTER 3 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR DESIGN RECONSTITUTION This guidance is appropriate for high-hazard facilities expected to operate for an extended period. Since DOE facilities vary in hazard level and circumstances of operation, a graded approach to implementation should be adopted. The implementation guidance is presented in the general sequence in which the design reconstitution (DR) adjunct program is expected to be developed and implemented. Figure 3-1 presents the top- level flowchart for the DR adjunct program. 3.1 PROGRAM PLANS AND PROCEDURES 3.1.1 DESIGN RECONSTITUTION PROGRAM PLAN The DR program plan should address the topics defined in program criterion 1.3.1.1.c. It should be prepared in accordance with direction set forth by the program management element of the CM

167

RL-721 Document ID Number: REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00081  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

81 81 I. Project Title: 300 Area Electrical Service Project, Hanford Site,Richland, Washington II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions ·e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Currently, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) obtains electrical services on the 300 Area of the Hanford Site from the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office {DOE-RL), Mission Support Alliance (MSA} I and Washington Closure Hanford (WCH). PNNL, with concurrence from the Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) and DOE-RL, is proposing to obtain 300 Area electrical services from the City of Richland (COR). The proposed plan for establishing new 12.47 kV power service is to install overhead power

168

Sensors Chapter of the IEEE Richland Section  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

MEETING MEETING of the Sensors Chapter of the IEEE Richland Section Wednesday, 27 August 2008 Dr. Wassana Yantasee, PNNL presenting Next-generation metal analyzers based on nanomaterials for biomonitoring and environmental monitoring Abstract: Large numbers of industrial workers are regularly expose to toxic heavy metals like mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb), which are known to induce various diseases that are detrimental to human health. In order to monitor workers for multiple toxic metal exposures and to ensure that these exposures are below a threshold for inducing permanent damage to various organ systems, real-time, non-invasive tools for monitoring of workplace and workers for toxic metal exposure is highly desirable. The portable metal analyzers are also highly beneficial to environmental monitoring of these toxic metals (e.g., in surface water, ground water,

169

DOE-HDBK-3012-2003; DOE Handbook Guide to Good Practices for Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Guide  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-96 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) TEAM LEADER'S GUIDE U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 FOREWORD This Department of Energy handbook, Guide to Good Practices for Conducting Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Handbook, is approved for use by all DOE Components and their contractors. The guidance in this document is the distillation of the experience and lessons learned during numerous operational readiness reviews contributed by team leaders with a wide range of backgrounds. There are

170

SFCD Environmental Assessment for Future Development on the South Federal Campus, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Draft Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment for Future Development on the South Federal Campus, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office Richland, Washington 99352 May 2013 DOE/EA-1958 U.S. Department of Energy DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment May 2013 DOE/EA-1958 U.S. Department of Energy DRAFT Summary The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is a multi-program U.S. Department of Energy- Office of Science (DOE-SC) national laboratory conducting research to meet DOE strategic objectives. To enable continued research support, DOE-SC is proposing to construct new facilities and infrastructure

171

SFCD Environmental Assessment for Future Development on the South Federal Campus, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment for Future Development in Proximity to the William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office Richland, Washington 99352 July 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1958 This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment July 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1958 Summary The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is a multi-program U.S. Department of Energy- Office of Science (DOE-SC) national laboratory conducting research to meet DOE strategic objectives. To enable continued research support, DOE-SC is proposing to construct new facilities and infrastructure

172

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington file:///I|/Data%20Migration%20Task/EIS-0189-FEIS-Summary-1996.HTM[6/27/2011 11:21:59 AM] The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires Federal agencies to analyze the potential environmental impacts of their proposed actions to assist them in making informed decisions. A similar Washington State law, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), requires State agencies, including the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), to analyze environmental impacts before making decisions that could impact the environment. A major emphasis of both laws is to promote public awareness of these actions and provide opportunities for public involvement. Because NEPA and SEPA requirements are similar, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Ecology

173

Environmental Protection, Safety, and Health Protection Program for DOE Operations  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This page change transmits a revised Attachment 1, a table of contents, and 6 chapters of DOE O 5480.1.

1980-12-18T23:59:59.000Z

174

Environmental Protection, Safety, and Health Protection Program for DOE Operations  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Page Change transmits a revised table of contents and Attachment 1, and adds four chapters of DOE O 5480.1.

1981-05-22T23:59:59.000Z

175

Environmental Protection, Safety, and Health Protection Program for DOE Operations  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Page Change transmits a revised Attachment 1, a table of contents, and one chapter of DOE O 5480.1.

1981-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

176

Environmental Protection, Safety, and Health Protection Program for DOE Operations  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Page Change transmits a revised Attachment 1, a table of contents, and one chapter of DOE O O 5480.1.

1981-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

177

Conduct of Operations - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

O 422.1 Admin Chg 1, Conduct of Operations by Earl Hughes Functional areas: Administrative Change, Conduct of Operations, Property Management, Safety and Security This Order...

178

Conduct of Operations - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations by Earl Hughes Functional areas: Administrative Change, Conduct of Operations, Safety, Security, Property Management This Order defines...

179

Best Estimate Radiation Flux Value-Added Procedure: Algorithm Operational Details and Explanations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 Best Estimate Radiation Flux Value-Added Procedure: Algorithm Operational Details and Explanations October 2002 Y. Shi and C. N. Long DOE, ARM, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Office of Health and Environmental Research Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Input Data ............................................................................................................................................... 1 3. Configuration Files.................................................................................................................................

180

Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Appliances & Electronics Sealing Your Home Ventilation Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Water Heating Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Clothes Washers: $20 - $30 Refrigerators: $15 Freezers: $15 Water Heaters: $25 Duct Sealing: $400 Controls: $300 Air-source Heat Pumps: $500 - $1,000 Ductless Heat Pumps: $1,500 Geothermal Heat Pumps: $2,000 Insulation: $0.05 - $0.85 per sq ft Windows: $6 per sq ft Richland Energy Services (RES) provides a number of rebates encouraging

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

EA-0915: Waste Tank Safety Program Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to resolve waste tank safety issues at the Hanford Site near the City of Richland, Washington, and to reduce the risks associated with...

182

Approved: 6-29-2010, Conduct of Operations, DOE O 422.1  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

1. PURPOSE. The objective of this Order is to define the requirements for establishing and implementing Conduct of Operations Programs at Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear...

183

Order Module--DOE Order 422.1, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

422.1, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS 422.1, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS Order Module--DOE Order 422.1, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS The general approach to implementing DOE O 422.1 is for contractors to develop, for DOE line management approval, documentation demonstrating implementation of the requirements in the contractor requirements document (CRD). DOE line management means the Federal officials such as Secretarial Officers and heads of field elements responsible for DOE facilities and operations. It is necessary to provide a conduct of operations matrix, which is a list of CRD requirements, citing the specific documentation that implements each item, or providing justification for each item that is not implemented. DOE line management must determine which facilities, other than hazard category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities, require implementation

184

Microsoft Word - DOE-CX-00013 Biological Sampling at WMA C Signed.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 1 CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION FOR SMALL MAMMAL SAMPLING NEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT AREA C, 200 EAST AREA, HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON Proposed Action The U.S. Department of Energy, (DOE) Office of River Protection (ORP) and the Richland Operations Office (RL) propose to conduct trapping and sampling of small mammals near Waste Management Area C (WMA C), in FY 2011. Location of Action The work will take place near and around the perimeter of WMA C, located within the 200 East Area, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Description of Proposed Action The proposed action, small mammal live trapping and sampling, will be performed near and around the perimeter of WMA C as part of a screening level ecological risk assessment for WMA C. The primary small mammal species targeted for collection in the study include

185

DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

DOEEIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic...

186

EA-0930: Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction Projects  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

30: Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction 30: Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction Projects Office, Grand Junction, Colorado EA-0930: Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction Projects Office, Grand Junction, Colorado SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to expand and upgrade the U.S. Department of Energy's Grand Junction Projects Office facilities and operations in Grand Junction, Colorado. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD June 8, 1996 EA-0930: Finding of No Significant Impact Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction Projects Office, Grand Junction, Colorado June 8, 1996 EA-0930: Final Environmental Assessment Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction Projects Office, Grand

187

DOE-STD-1075-94; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5-94 5-94 July 1994 DOE STANDARD STANDARD FOR DEVELOPING AND ISSUING DOE SAFETY GUIDES AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDES U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94018438 DOE-STD-1075-94 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) standard was prepared by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health with the assistance of James E. Konklin of

188

DOE/EIS-0222-SA-O1 Supplement Analysis Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22-SA-O1 22-SA-O1 Supplement Analysis Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 June 2008 DOE/EIS-0222-SA-0 1 SUMMARY In September 1999 the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued the Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan (HCP) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) (DOE/EIS-0222-F). The HCP EIS analyzed the impacts of alternatives for implementing a land-use plan for the DOE's Hanford Site for at least the next 50-year planning period and lasting for as long as DOE retains legal control of some portion of the real estate. In November 1999 DOE issued its Record of Decision (ROD), establishing the Comprehensive Land-Use Plan (CLUP), which consisted of four key elements:

189

Approved: 6-29-2010, Conduct of Operations, DOE O 422.1 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Approved: 6-29-2010, Conduct of Operations, DOE O 422.1 Approved: 6-29-2010, Conduct of Operations, DOE O 422.1 Approved: 6-29-2010, Conduct of Operations, DOE O 422.1 1. PURPOSE. The objective of this Order is to define the requirements for establishing and implementing Conduct of Operations Programs at Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), facilities and projects. A Conduct of Operations Program consists of formal documentation, practices, and actions implementing disciplined and structured operations that support mission success and promote worker, public, and environmental protection. The goal is to minimize the likelihood and consequences of human fallibility or technical and organizational system failures. Conduct of Operations is one of the safety management programs recognized in the Nuclear Safety Rule [Title 10

190

Continuity of Operations (COOP) Implementation Plan | U.S. DOE...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

methods to safeguard personnel, records, and facilities, and ensures the capability to conduct functions at an office of convenience, Alternate Operating Facility (AOF), or...

191

Operations Program Management (OPM) Homepage | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Information Operations Program Management U.S. Department of Energy SC-33Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-8429 F: (301)...

192

Microsoft Word - DOE_EA-1454.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F, 100-H, and 100-N Areas U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 March 2003 DOE/EA-1454 Rev. 0 EA for Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F, 100-H, and 100-N Areas March 2003 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION ................................................... 1-1 2.0 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 2-1 3.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ....................................................... 3-1 3.1 PROPOSED ACTION ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ..........................................

193

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory July 3, 2008 - 2:15pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued its Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of a contractor to manage and operate Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), a DOE Office of Science research facility in Princeton, NJ. PPPL receives approximately $78 million annually from DOE. This is the first competition for a contractor in the history of the laboratory. The RFP describes the criteria DOE will use in selecting a successful future management and operating (M&O) contractor. Key criteria include:

194

Resources | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Resources Resources Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 Resources Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Contact: Pacific Northwest Site Office P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 (509) 372-4005 Public Affairs: Larry Moore (509) 372-4365 Email: larry.moore@pnso.science.doe.gov Links: DOE-Battelle Prime Contract for the Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory External link U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Pacific Northwest National Laboratory External link Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory External link

195

DOE/EIS-0222 Revised Draft Hanford Remedial Action Environmental Impact Statement and Comprehensive Land-Use Plan, April 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Draft Draft Executive Summary Cover Sheet 1 2 3 Lead Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 4 5 Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Department of the Interior (Bureau of Land Management, 6 Bureau of Reclamation, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service); Benton, Franklin, and Grant 7 counties; and the City of Richland 8 9 Consulting Tribal Governments: Nez Perce Tribe Department of Environmental Restoration 10 and Waste Management and the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation 11 12 Title: Revised Draft Hanford Remedial Action Environmental Impact Statement and 13 Comprehensive Land-Use Plan (HRA-EIS), Hanford Site, Richland, Washington 14 15 Contacts: For further information on this EIS call or contact: 16 17 Thomas W. Ferns, HRA-EIS Document Manager 18 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office

196

Town of Richlands, Virginia (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Richlands, Virginia (Utility Company) Richlands, Virginia (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name Town of Richlands Place Virginia Utility Id 15982 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location RFC NERC RFC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Schedule L.G.S. (Large General Electric Service) Industrial Schedule M.G.S. (Medium General Services) Commercial Schedule O.L. (Outdoor Lighting) 100 watt (shared) H.P Sodium Lighting Schedule O.L. (Outdoor Lighting) 100 watt H.P. Sodium Lighting Schedule O.L. (Outdoor Lighting) 100 watt HPS Post Top Lighting

197

Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Conservation and Solar Loan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Conservation and Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Conservation and Solar Loan Program Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Conservation and Solar Loan Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Sealing Your Home Appliances & Electronics Design & Remodeling Windows, Doors, & Skylights Ventilation Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Water Heating Solar Buying & Making Electricity Maximum Rebate $15,000 Equipment Specific Maximums Heat Pump: $10,000 Ductwork: $1,500 Clothes washer $1,500 Refrigerator $3,000 Freezer $800 Electric water heater $700 Solar water heater $4,000 Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Loan Program Rebate Amount up to $15,000

198

Richland Energy Services - Energy Efficient Commercial Lighting Program |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Energy Services - Energy Efficient Commercial Lighting Richland Energy Services - Energy Efficient Commercial Lighting Program Richland Energy Services - Energy Efficient Commercial Lighting Program < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Industrial Institutional Nonprofit Savings Category Other Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Maximum Rebate 70% of the total cost Program Info Expiration Date 9/30/2012 State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount T5/T8 with Electric Ballasts: $10 - $65 Hardwired CFL's: $40 - $80 Screw In CFL's: $3 - $12 Cold Cathode: $3 - $15 Ceramic Metal Halide Fixture: $30 - $50 LED's: $15 - $50 Induction: $80 - $400 High-output T5/T8: $50 - $180 Metal Halide/High Pressure Sodium: $80 - $400 Stairwell/Garage Fluorescent Fixture: $50 Occupancy Sensor/Timer: $30 - $60

199

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

II-A-1 II-A-1 DOE-STD-1073-93 APPENDIX lI-A DESIGN CONTROL Design controls are the measures established to assure that the design process activities are carried out in a planned, orderly, correct, and documented manner. These controls assure the quality of the design requirements and design basis obtained through the design process. Design controls are constraints to the design process that ensure the following results: the correct identification of design inputs and constraints; the design analysis and calculations are complete and correct; and the design outputs are complete and consistent with the design basis. Design controls are implemented through procedures. DOE 5700.6C, Quality Assurance, defines DOE design control requirements. ANSI/ASME NQA-1, Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants, provides additional guidance on design

200

MEMORANDUM FORMA TTHEW S. MCCORMICK MANAGER RICHLAND OPERATIONS...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

at (202) 586-5216. cc: P. Bosco, MA.;SQ D. Chung, EM-2 C. Anderson, EM-3 M. Gilbertson, EM-50 J. Surash, EM-80 T. Harms, EM-4.1 L. Ely, EM-11 W. Whitley, EM-4.1 R. Rimando, EM-10 ...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $800 million per year and is for a five-year base period with the option to extend it for up to five additional years. SRNS is a limited liability corporation consisting of Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., and Newport News

202

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory July 10, 2006 - 2:57pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the issuance of a final Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of an approximately $1.58 billion, five-year management and operating contract for Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). Fermilab is a major DOE Office of Science single program research facility located on 6,800 acres approximately 45 miles west of Chicago, Illinois. "Fermilab is a world leader in high energy physics, which helps the U.S.

203

DOE-HDBK-3012-96; Team Leader's Preparation Guide for Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INCH-POUND INCH-POUND DOE-HDBK-3012-96 June 1996 SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-94 September 1994 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) TEAM LEADER'S GUIDE U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009471 DOE-HDBK-3012-96 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy handbook, Guide to Good Practices for Conducting Operational

204

About | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

About About Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (600KB) Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 About Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Located in Richland, Washington, the Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) provides programmatic, operational, and institutional stewardship and oversight of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in support of the Department's science and technology programs, goals, and objectives. We oversee the current DOE-Battelle Prime Contract for the Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory with our goal being to

205

DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground August 15, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Deb Gill www.wipp.energy.gov 575-234-7270 CARLSBAD, N.M. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced that disposal operations in Panel 5 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) underground repository are complete. Last month, the final contact-handled transuranic (CH-TRU) waste shipment was emplaced in the panel, which took just over two years to fill. "All TRU waste management employees at WIPP and at the generator sites deserve the credit for this accomplishment," National TRU Program Director J.R. Stroble said. "It is through their dedication to performing

206

CRAD, DOE Oversight- Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a DOE independent oversight assessment of the Y-12 Site Office's programs for oversight of its contractors at the Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility.

207

DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II: Response to Public Comments (January 2 DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II: Response to Public Comments (January 2 DOE issued the Draft SEIS for public review and comment by mailings to stakeholders and by announcements in the Federal Register (FR) on November 5, 1999, (64 FR 60430) (Attachment 4 of Volume I) and on November 12, 1999 (64 FR 61635) correcting a document title (Attachment 5 of Volume I). On

208

EIS-0356: Retrieval, Treatment and Disposal of Tank Wastes and Closure of Single-Shell Tanks at the Hanford Site, Richland, WA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS analyzes DOE's proposed retrieval, treatment, and disposal of the waste being managed in the high-level waste (HLW) tank farms at the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington, and closure of the 149 single-shell tanks (SSTs) and associated facilities in the HLW tank farms.

209

RICHLAND COUNTY With 5,644 students and 39,412 alumni, there's no limit  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

campuses, fy 2012) Richland County Baruch Institute Carolina on King USC School of Medicine GreenvilleRICHLAND COUNTY With 5,644 students and 39,412 alumni, there's no limit to Gamecock pride in Richland County. This report highlights the university's impact on your community. January 2013

Almor, Amit

210

DOE Selects ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy Laboratory DOE Selects ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy Laboratory July 29, 2008 - 2:40pm Addthis WASHINGTON - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the Alliance for Sustainable Energy (ASE) LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Golden, Colorado. The cost-plus award-fee contract is valued at approximately $1.1 billion, subject to annual appropriations, over a five-year contract period. The contract includes an option to extend it for up to five additional years. "While there is certainly no 'silver bullet' that will solve the world's energy problems, we know that renewable energy and efficiency technologies

211

DOE-STD-1038-93; Guide to Good Practices for Operations Turnover  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8-93 8-93 June 1993 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONS TURNOVER U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No.1 DOE-STD-1038-93 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Operations Turnover Page/Section Change Concluding Material The Preparing Activity was changed from NE-

212

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Argonne National Laboratory April 19, 2006 - 10:23am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the issuance of a final Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of an approximated $2.54 billion, five-year management and operating contract for Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), a DOE Office of Science multi-program research facility located near Chicago, Illinois. "Argonne lab contributes expert scientists and unique leadership in basic research, which helps the U.S. maintain our global competitiveness," said Office of Science Director, Dr. Raymond L. Orbach. "Through this contracting process, DOE seeks the best possible management of this

213

DOE-STD-1043-93 CN-1; Guide to Good Practices for Operator Aid Postings  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-93 3-93 June 1993 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATOR AID POSTINGS U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No. 1 DOE-STD-1043-93 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Operator Aid Postings Page / Section Change Concluding Material

214

DOE-STD-1034-93; Guide to Good Practices for Timely Orders to Operators  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-93 4-93 March 1993 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TIMELY ORDERS TO OPERATORS U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No. 1 DOE-STD-1034-93 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Timely Orders to Operators Page / Section Change p. 10 / Section 4.3

215

DOE-STD-1037-93; Guide to Good Practices for Operations Aspects of Unique Processes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7-93 7-93 June 1993 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONS ASPECTS OF UNIQUE PROCESSES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No. 1 DOE-STD-1037-93 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Operations Aspects of Unique Processes Page / Section

216

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $800 million per year and is for a five-year base period with the option to extend it for up to five additional years. SRNS is a limited liability corporation consisting of Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., and Newport News

217

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective July 2, 2012 - 3:03pm Addthis Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Former Associate Deputy Secretary

218

DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate WIPP DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate WIPP January 18, 2005 - 9:55am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that it has decided to exercise the five year option in the Washington TRU Solutions LLC ("WTS") contract to continue managing and operating the Department's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), located in New Mexico. The option DOE exercised is a part of the WIPP contract that was competitively procured in 2000. The WTS contract will now run through September 30, 2010 with an estimated value over the five year timeframe of approximately $704 million. "We are very pleased to take this step," said Kyle McSlarrow, Deputy

219

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

its Ames Laboratory its Ames Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Ames Laboratory June 29, 2006 - 2:48pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued its Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of a management and operating (M&O) contractor to operate Ames Laboratory, a DOE Office of Science (SC) research facility in Ames, Iowa. This competition for a contractor is the first in the history of the laboratory. Ames is a laboratory that has been funded at approximately $30 million annually by the Office of Science, other government agencies, and private industry. "Ames Laboratory provides leadership in basic research across a broad spectrum of science, with great expertise in biology, chemistry, physics

220

Deputy Director for Field Operations Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Deputy Director for Field Operations Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Oversight Operations Improvement Committee Contact Information Deputy Director for Field Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-3/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5434 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page The DOE laboratory system is the most comprehensive research system of its kind in the world, and constitutes a critical strategic scientific and technical resource. The Office of Science has responsibility for 10 of the 17 DOE laboratories, helping to ensure they deliver exceptional scientific productivity benefiting the taxpayer. Each laboratory is

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective July 2, 2012 - 3:03pm Addthis Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Former Associate Deputy Secretary

222

Operational Awareness Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project, April 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HIAR-RL-2011-04-07 HIAR-RL-2011-04-07 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Sludge Treatment Project Dates of Activity : 11/17/2010 - 04/07/2011 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Result: On November 17, 2010, a HSS representative participated in a tour of the STP test facility. The HSS representative was also briefed by the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) Project Engineer, the CHPRC STP Design

223

2002 DOE/DNFSB Interface Workshop - Participants  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE/DNFSB Interface Workshop DOE/DNFSB Interface Workshop PARTICIPANTS Amerine, Dave CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Hanford P. O. Box 1500 MSIN: H6-63 Richland, WA 99352 509-376-5107 509-372-1664 (Fax) David_B_Amerine@rl.gov Bailey, Nolan Board Point of Conact, Nevada Operations Office 232 Energy Way North Las Vegas, NA 89030 702-295-4601 702-295-2261 (Fax) bailey@nv.doe.gov Bartlett, William Carlsbad Technical Assistance Contractor, WIPP 4021 National Parks Hwy Carlsbad, NM 88220 505-234-7160 505-234-7198 (Fax) bill.bartlett@wipp.ws Beck, Dave NNSA Assistant Deputy Administrator for Military Application and Stockpile Operations, NA-12 1000 Independence Ave Washington, DC 20585 202-586-4879 Black, Dick Director, EH Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy, EH-53 1000 Independence Ave

224

Field Operations Organization | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Field Operations Organization Field Operations Organization Deputy Director for Field Operations Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Organization Chart .pdf file (77KB) Field Offices Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) Oversight Operations Improvement Committee Contact Information Deputy Director for Field Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-3/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5434 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov Field Operations Organization Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Field Operations is led by Deputy Director Joseph McBrearty and consists of three major elements - Site Offices, a Support Center, and Headquarters

225

DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground DOE Completes Disposal Operations In Panel 5 of the WIPP Underground August 15, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Deb Gill www.wipp.energy.gov 575-234-7270 CARLSBAD, N.M. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced that disposal operations in Panel 5 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) underground repository are complete. Last month, the final contact-handled transuranic (CH-TRU) waste shipment was emplaced in the panel, which took just over two years to fill. "All TRU waste management employees at WIPP and at the generator sites deserve the credit for this accomplishment," National TRU Program Director J.R. Stroble said. "It is through their dedication to performing their jobs safely, compliantly and timely that WIPP and the TRU Waste

226

DOE Considers Natural Gas Utility Service Options: Proposal Includes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Considers Natural Gas Utility Service Options: Proposal Considers Natural Gas Utility Service Options: Proposal Includes 30-mile Natural Gas Pipeline from Pasco to Hanford DOE Considers Natural Gas Utility Service Options: Proposal Includes 30-mile Natural Gas Pipeline from Pasco to Hanford January 23, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Cameron Hardy, DOE , (509) 376-5365, Cameron.Hardy@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is considering natural gas transportation and distribution requirements to support the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) and evaporator operations at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. DOE awarded a task order worth up to $5 million to the local, licensed supplier of natural gas in the Hanford area, Cascade Natural Gas Corporation (Cascade). Cascade will support DOE and its Environmental

227

DOE/EIS0247; Final Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SNS FEIS SNS FEIS Cover Sheet COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source (DOE/EIS-0247) LOCATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE SITES: Illinois, New Mexico, New York, and Tennessee. CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. David Wilfert, EIS Document Manager Oak Ridge Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road, 146/FEDC Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone: (800) 927-9964 Facsimile: (423) 576-4542 E-mail: NSNSEIS@ornl.gov Mr. Jeff Hoy, SNS Program Manager Office of Basic Energy Research U.S. Department of Energy (ER-10) Germantown, MD 20874 Telephone: (301) 903-4924 Facsimile: (301) 903-9513 E-mail: Jeff.Hoy@mailgw.er.doe.gov

228

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory July 10, 2006 - 2:57pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the issuance of a final Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of an approximately $1.58 billion, five-year management and operating contract for Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). Fermilab is a major DOE Office of Science single program research facility located on 6,800 acres approximately 45 miles west of Chicago, Illinois. "Fermilab is a world leader in high energy physics, which helps the U.S. maintain global competitiveness," said Under Secretary for Science, Dr.

229

Operations Improvement Committee | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Operations Improvement Committee Operations Improvement Committee Deputy Director for Field Operations Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Oversight Operations Improvement Committee Contact Information Deputy Director for Field Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-3/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5434 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov Operations Improvement Committee Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science (SC)-the lead federal agency supporting fundamental scientific research for energy and the Nation's largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences-has two principal thrusts: direct support of scientific research and direct

230

DOE High Performance Computing Operational Review (HPCOR): Enabling Data-Driven Scientific Discovery at HPC Facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) High Performance Computing (HPC) facilities are on the verge of a paradigm shift in the way they deliver systems and services to science and engineering teams. Research projects are producing a wide variety of data at unprecedented scale and level of complexity, with community-specific services that are part of the data collection and analysis workflow. On June 18-19, 2014 representatives from six DOE HPC centers met in Oakland, CA at the DOE High Performance Operational Review (HPCOR) to discuss how they can best provide facilities and services to enable large-scale data-driven scientific discovery at the DOE national laboratories. The report contains findings from that review.

Gerber, Richard; Allcock, William; Beggio, Chris; Campbell, Stuart; Cherry, Andrew; Cholia, Shreyas; Dart, Eli; England, Clay; Fahey, Tim; Foertter, Fernanda; Goldstone, Robin; Hick, Jason; Karelitz, David; Kelly, Kaki; Monroe, Laura; Prabhat,; Skinner, David; White, Julia

2014-10-17T23:59:59.000Z

231

DOE-HDBK-5504-95; Guidance for Evaluation of Operational Emergency Plans  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5504-95 5504-95 March 1995 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDANCE FOR EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL EMERGENCY PLANS U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE95012002 DOE-HDBK-5504-95 iii FOREWORD This handbook incorporates emergency planning information from the following EPA and OSHA regulations:

232

DOEEA-1178 Assessment 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Assessment 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. March 1997 , DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liabili- ty or mponsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, appa- ratus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or s e m ' c e by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or

233

CERCLA Preliminary Assessment of DOE'S Nevada Operations Office Nuclear Weapons Testing  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

tudies/B ackground tudies/B ackground Book 1 CERCLA Preliminary Assessment of DOE'S Nevada Operations Office Nuclear Weapons Testing Areas Vol. 11, April 1988 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. CERCLA PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF DOE'S NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE WCILEAR WEAPONS T E S r n G AREAS Prepared by Water Resources Center Desert Research Institute University of Nevada System ,Prepared for U . S . Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada under contract DE-AC08-85NV10384 A p r i l 1988 CONTENTS VOLUME I I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 11. NEVADA TEST SITE TESTING AREAS 2.1 Frenchman Flat (Area 5) 2.1.1 2.2 Yucca Flat (Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 15)

234

DOE Nevada Operations Office Environmental Protection Implementation Plan, November 9, 1993--November 9, 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE Order 5400.1, ``General Environmental Protection Program,`` established environmental protection program requirements, authorities, and responsibilities to assure that the Department of Energy (DOE) operations are in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal department policies. Chapter III of DOE Order 5400.1 required that each field organization prepare a plan for implementing the requirements of this order by no later than November 9, 1989, and update the plan annually. Therefore, the Department of Energy/Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) has prepared this fourth annual update of its Environmental Protection Implementation Plan (EPIP). The Order and corresponding guidances also require estimated budgetary resources necessary for implementation of the Order be identified in the Environmental Protection Implementation Plan. To satisfy this requirement, the estimated costs to effectuate necessary changes in existing programs or processes and to institute new programs or processes for compliance with the Order are provided in the following sections of this plan. The DOE/NV Assistant Manager for Environment, Safety, Security, & Health (AMESSH), in consultation with other organizations responsible for line management of plan implementation, is responsible for annual plan revisions.

Elle, D.R. [USDOE Nevada Operations Office, Las Vegas, NV (United States); Townsend, Y.E. [ed.; Latham, A.R.; Black, S.C. [Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Co., Inc., Las Vegas, NV (United States)

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

Business Policy and Operations Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Organization » BPO Home Organization » BPO Home Business Policy and Operations (BPO) BPO Home Leadership Organization Chart .pdf file (195KB) Business Management and Planning (BMP) Division SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Contact Information Business Policy & Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-45/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-0192 F: (301) 903-2481 More Information » Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page The Office of Business Policy and Operations (BPO) is the provider of information technology and information resource services for systems supporting the DOE Office of Science (SC) Headquarters. We are a focused group committed to implementing the organization's strategic and operating plans, and helping our customers accelerate business innovation through

236

Microsoft Word - CX-BadgerCanyon-RichlandNo1_WoodPoles_FY13.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2013 7, 2013 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR/Pasco SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Walker Miller Electrical Engineer - TPCF-W RICHLAND Proposed Action: Wood pole replacements on the Badger Canyon-Richland #1 transmission line PP&A Project No.: 2670 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.3 Routine maintenance activities. Location: City of Richland, Benton County, WA Transmission Line/ROW Structure # Township Range Section County, State Badger Canyon-Richland #1 4/9 and 4/10 9N 28E 26 Benton, WA Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: BPA, at the expense of the City of Richland, proposes to raise structures 4/9 and 4/10 of the Badger Canyon-Richland #1 115-kilovolt transmission line to

237

EIS-0119: Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Harford Site, Richland, WA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS presents analyses of potential environmental impacts of decommissioning the eight surplus production reactors at the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington.

238

EIS-0119: Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS presents analyses of potential environmental impacts of decommissioning the eight surplus production reactors at the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington.

239

Memorandum requesting a clarification of the circumstances under which a DOE Government Owned Contractor Operated (GOCO) facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Memorandum requesting a clarification of the circumstances under which a DOE Government Owned Contractor Operated (GOCO) facility may be considered a laser manufacturer and subject to FDA laser manufacturer requirements and other points of interpretation of the FDA Exemption Letter, 78EL-01DOE (DOE exemption or exemption) by the LSSG for GOCG facilities.

240

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 25 to June 14, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 to June 14, 2010 5 to June 14, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project No incidents to report. Operational Summary

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For November 15 to December 1, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

15 to December 1, 2010 15 to December 1, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary

242

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Sept. 29 to Oct. 12, 2009  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

29 to Oct. 12, 2009 29 to Oct. 12, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project No incidents to report. Operational Summary

243

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For September 12 to September 26, 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 to September 26, 2011 2 to September 26, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary

244

Impact of DOE Orders on Waste Management Operation. Volume 1: [Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Department of Energy Orders are the internal documents which govern the management of all Department of Energy facilities and operations. DOE Orders are the vehicles by which Federal and state laws and regulations are applied to Department of Energy activities. A selected set of 22 Department of Energy Orders was reviewed to identify the applicability and impact of each Order on waste management operations at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Of the 22 Orders reviewed, five set forth requirements which have a high degree of impact on waste management activities. Eight Orders have a moderate degree of impact on waste management activities, and the remaining nine Orders have a low degree of impact.

Klein, R.B.; Jennrich, E.A.; Shuman, R.; Sandquist, G.M. [Rogers and Associates Engineering Corp., Salt Lake City, UT (United States); Rutz, A.C.; Littleton, M.W.; McCauce, C.H. [Wastren, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

1989-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

Site Environmental Report for calendar year 1998, DOE operations at Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Annual Site Environmental Report for 1998 describes the environmental conditions related to work performed for the Department of Energy (DOE) at Area IV of the Rocketdyne Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) and De Soto facilities. In the past, these operations included development, fabrication, and disassembly of nuclear reactors, reactor fuel, and other radioactive materials, under the Atomics International (AI) Division. Other activities included the operation of large-scale liquid metal facilities for testing of liquid metal fast breeder components at the Energy Technology Engineering Center (ETEC), a government-owned company-operated, test facility within Area IV. AI was merged into Rocketdyne in 1984 and many of the AI functions were transferred to existing Rocketdyne departments. All nuclear work was terminated in 1988, and subsequently, all radiological work has been directed toward decontamination and decommissioning (D and D) of the previously used nuclear facilities and associated site areas. Large-scale D and D activities of the sodium test facilities began in 1996. Results of the radiological monitoring program for the calendar year of 1998 continue to indicate that there are no significant releases of radioactive material from Rocketdyne sites. All potential exposure pathways are sampled and/or monitored, including air, soil, surface water, groundwater, and direct radiation. All radioactive wastes are processed for disposal at DOE disposal sites and other sites approved by DOE and licensed for radioactive waste. Liquid radioactive wastes are not released into the environment and do not constitute an exposure pathway.

Rutherford, P.D. [ed.] [ed.

1999-09-22T23:59:59.000Z

246

NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The objective of this Order is to define the requirements for establishing and implementing Conduct of Operations Programs at Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), facilities and projects. A Conduct of Operations Program consists of formal documentation, practices, and actions implementing disciplined and structured operations that support mission success and promote worker, public, and environmental protection. The goal is to minimize the likelihood and consequences of human fallibility or technical and organizational system failures. Conduct of Operations is one of the safety management programs recognized in the Nuclear Safety Rule [Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 830, Nuclear Safety Management], but it also supports safety and mission success for a wide range of hazardous, complex, or mission-critical operations, and some conduct of operations attributes can enhance even routine operations. It supports the Integrated Safety Management (ISM) System by providing concrete techniques and practices to implement the ISM Core Functions of Develop and Implement Hazard Controls and Perform Work Within Controls. It may be implemented through facility policies, directives, plans, and safety management systems and need not be a stand-alone program.

247

DOE/EA-0767 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF AN INDUSTRIAL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

767 767 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF AN INDUSTRIAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL AT PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT PIKETON, OHIO OCTOBER 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE MAST ~P . L...~ I OOTRlSUTiON· O F THIS OOCl,lJlOO IS lIUi&fJtID Ct( OSTI Environmental Assessment Construction and Operation of an Industrial Solid Waste Landfill at Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Piketon. Ohio October 1995 Prepared by LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS. INC. Environmental Management and Enrichment Facilities P. O. Box 628 Piketon. Ohio 45661 for the U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Under Contract DE-AC05-840R21400 DOE/EA-0767 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES AND TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

248

Transuranic Waste Retrieval from the 218-W-4B and 218-W-4C Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

05 05 Environmental Assessment Transuranic Waste Retrieval from the 218-W-4B and 218-W-4C Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. March 2002 DOE/EA-1405 U.S. Department of Energy Contents Environmental Assessment C-1 March 2002 CONTENTS PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................P-1 GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................ G-1 SCIENTIFIC NOTATION CONVERSION CHART .................................................................... G-2 METRIC CONVERSION CHART...............................................................................................

249

Environmental Survey preliminary report, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site, conducted August 18 through September 5, 1986. The Survey is being conducted by an interdisciplinary team of environmental specialists, led and managed by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health's Office of Environmental Audit. Individual team components are being supplied by a private contractor. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with the Hanford Site. The Survey covers all environmental media and all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. This phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations carried on at the Hanford Site, and interviews with site personnel. The Survey team developed a Sampling and Analysis Plan to assist in further assessing certain of the environmental problems identified during its on-site activities. The Sampling and Analysis Plan will be executed by a DOE National Laboratory or a support contractor. When completed, the results will be incorporated into the Environmental Survey Interim Report for the Hanford Site. The Interim Report will reflect the final determinations of the Hanford Site Survey. 44 refs., 88 figs., 74 tabs.

Not Available

1987-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

City of Richland Center, Wisconsin (Utility Company) | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wisconsin (Utility Company) Wisconsin (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name City of Richland Center Place Wisconsin Utility Id 15978 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location MRO NERC MRO Yes ISO MISO Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Cp-1 Small Power Service Industrial Cp-1 Small Power Service Primary Metering Discount with Parallel Generation(20kW or less) Industrial Cp-1 Small Power Service Primary Metering and Transformer Ownership Discount Industrial Cp-1 Small Power Service Primary Metering and Transformer Ownership Discount with Parallel Generation(20kW or less) Industrial

251

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - DOE-SR News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Release Archive Release Archive DOE-SR News Release Archive 2012 News Releases Savannah River Site Reaches Significant Milestone with Waste Tank Closure SR-2012-06 Adobe Acrobat PDF DOE to Extend Savannah River Nuclear Solutions Contract at Savannah River Site to September 2016 SR-2012-05 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Site Federal Employees Volunteer for United Way Campaign SR-2012-04 Adobe Acrobat PDF Installation of Six Large Process Tanks Mark Big Step in Construction of Critical Waste Cleanup Facility at SRS SR-2012-03 Adobe Acrobat PDF Grouting Begins on First SRS Waste Tanks Since 1997 SR-2012-02 Adobe Acrobat PDF SRS Marks Successful Operational Startup of New Biomass Cogeneration Facility SR-2012-01 Adobe Acrobat PDF 2011 News Releases Recovery Act Funds Test Reactor Dome Removal in Historic D&D Project

252

March 30, 2010, Face to Face Meeting Presentation - DOE FTCP FY10 Operational Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Federal Technical Capability Panel DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel FY10 Operational Plan G l 1 Obj ti 2 Goal 1 Objective 2: Define and implement a standard approach for continuing technical training for personnel in the continuing technical training for personnel in the TQP March 2010 Mark Sundie and Carol Ingram, Co-champions g , p Objectives for Today Goal 1 Objective 2 Goals for Face-to-Face: Goal 1 Objective 2 Goals for Face to Face: Obtain approval of revised wording Obtain approval of revised wording * Obtain FTCP input and buy-in on path forward: forward: Brief Panel on Status of Objective 2 Ensure that outcomes support DOE long-term mission pp g needs and provide management flexibility in TQP implementation G1 O2 Summary Face to Face Mar2010 FINAL Carol Ingram, NNSA/LSO

253

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Feb. 3 to Feb. 22, 2010*  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Feb. 3 to Feb. 22, 2010* Feb. 3 to Feb. 22, 2010* EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. * Because of a problem in collecting the data, this report includes three weeks worth of summaries, rather than the normal two.

254

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Feb. 22 to March 8, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

22 to March 8, 2010 22 to March 8, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. * Because of a problem in collecting the data, this report includes three weeks worth of summaries, rather than the normal two.

255

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - DOE-SR News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Releases Releases DOE-SR News Releases GROUTING TO BEGIN TOMORROW ON TWO ADDITIONAL SRS WASTE TANKS SR-2013-08 Adobe Acrobat PDF PARSONS' SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY PROJECT EARNS DOE VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM MERIT AWARD SR-2013-07 Adobe Acrobat PDF Public Comment Sought for Savannah River Site Workforce Restructuring Plan SR-2013-06 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Site Citizens Advisory Board Seeking New Members SR-2013-05 Adobe Acrobat PDF Salt Waste Processing Facility: New Leadership SR-2013-04 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Site Exceeds Waste Shipment Goals SR-2013-03 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Operations Office Honors Federal Manager of the Year SR-2013-02 Adobe Acrobat PDF SRS Advisory Board to Hold Augusta Public Meeting March 25-26 SR-2013-01 Adobe Acrobat PDF

256

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For March 28 to April 24, 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

28 to April 24, 2012 28 to April 24, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Waste retrieval resumes at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project

257

DOE handbook: Guide to good practices for operational readiness reviews (ORR) team leader`s guide  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This guidance section provides instructions, explanations and examples for the performance of all phases of an Operational Readiness Review (ORR). Details pertinent to the Team Leader (TL), Team Members (TM) and Review Coordinator (RC) are outlined. An appendix contains sample forms and correspondence which are typically used to initiate and perform the ORR. Although this document was written specifically for use by DOE ORR Team Leaders, its use may also be beneficial to contractor ORR Team Leaders. The handbook is also useful for Team Leaders of Readiness Assessments conducted in accordance with requirements of DOE O 425.1. Lessons learned, which are promulgated with this handbook, will benefit any line manager, particularly those preparing a facility or process for startup or restart.

NONE

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For December 1 to December 20, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 to December 20, 2010 1 to December 20, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Dec. 13: An Advanced Waste Treatment Facility employee failed to obtain independent verficiation of data entered into the facility's computerized Fissile Material Tracking System. The error did not cause a reduction in the margin of safety of any of the facility's Mass Control Areas. Operations were placed on hold for an investigation, the procedure was clarified and operations resumed. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0026).

259

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOE/EA-0821 FOR THE OPERATION OF THE GLASS MELTER  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

. - . - ..... . - ... .,. ..... .. :,! ~ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOE/EA-0821 FOR THE OPERATION OF THE GLASS MELTER THERMAL TREATMENT UNIT AT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S MOUND PLANT, MIAMISBURG, OHIO . JUNE,1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY L..-_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ DIS _TRIBunON OF !HIS DocM~Sbli R DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. , ' .. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE . . . .. ..... . .. . ...... .. . . .. .. . . ... . ....... ..*..... ... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... .. . .. . . ...... . .. . .. *.. .. . . . ***....... 1·1 1.1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION .. . . * . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . .. 1-1 1.2 BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . * . . . . * * . * * . . . . . . .. 1·2

260

17.6 - Origin, Characteristics, and Significance of the DOE's Management and Operating  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chapter 17.6 (October 2007) Chapter 17.6 (October 2007) 1 DISCUSSION OF THE ORIGIN, CHARACTERISTICS, AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY's MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING (M&O) FORM OF CONTRACT INTRODUCTION. "Management and operating" (M&O) contract is a term used to describe the contracts that are central to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) business model. The term was adopted formally in a memorandum from the Secretary of Energy, dated October 5, 1983. 1 However, these contracts predate the inception of the term by more than thirty-five years, dating to contracts awarded by the Corps of Engineers during World War II, and other contracts awarded by the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) from its creation in the Atomic Energy Act of 1946.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

New Groundwater Treatment Facility Begins Operation: Boost in Cleanup  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

New Groundwater Treatment Facility Begins Operation: Boost in New Groundwater Treatment Facility Begins Operation: Boost in Cleanup Accelerated by Recovery Act Funding New Groundwater Treatment Facility Begins Operation: Boost in Cleanup Accelerated by Recovery Act Funding January 19, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Andre Armstrong, CH2M HILL (509)376-6773 Andre_L_Armstrong@rl.gov Geoff Tyree, DOE (509) 376-4171 Geoffrey.Tyree@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is boosting its capacity for treating groundwater to remove chromium near the Columbia River by 40 percent with the recent completion of a new treatment facility. Contractor CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M HILL) finished building and started operating the new 100-DX groundwater treatment facility in December. The facility is located near the D and DR Reactors on

262

DOE, Washington Closure complete recycling project at Hanford  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

RICHLAND, Wash. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) recently teamed with contractor Washington Closure Hanford to complete a major recycling effort during cleanup of the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State.

263

Environmental assessment, K Pool fish rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has a need to respond to a request to lease facilities at the Hanford Site 100-KE and 100-KW filter plant pools (K Pools) for fish rearing activities. These fish rearing activities would be: (1) business ventures with public and private funds and (2) long-term enhancement and supplementation programs for game fish populations in the Columbia River Basin. The proposed action is to enter into a use permit or lease agreement with the YIN or other parties who would rear fish in the 100-K Area Pools. The proposed action would include necessary piping, pump, and electrical upgrades of the facility; cleaning and preparation of the pools; water withdrawal from the Columbia River, and any necessary water or wastewater treatment; and introduction, rearing and release of fish. Future commercial operations may be included.

NONE

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

264

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Jan. 19 to Feb. 2, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 to Feb. 2, 2010 9 to Feb. 2, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary Waste Shipments: During the period Jan. 20 through Jan. 26, 2010, BBWI shipped 29.73 cubic meters of mixed low level waste for treatment and disposal at EnergySolutions facility in Clive, UT. BBWI shipped 36.2 cubic meters of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act low level waste for accelerated disposal at the Nevada Test Site.

265

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For September 27 to October 17, 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 to October 17, 2011 7 to October 17, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary Waste Shipments: As of Oct. 15, 2011, a total of 36,625 cubic meters of contact-handled transuranic waste, 106.72 cubic meters of remote-handled transuranic waste, and 4,990 cubic meters of previously-buried transuranic waste have been shipped from Idaho to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico for disposal.

266

Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power DOE Operations annual site environmental report 1997  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report discusses environmental monitoring at two manufacturing and test sites operated in the Los Angeles area by Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power of Boeing North American, Inc. These are identified as Area 4 of the SSFL and the De Soto site. These sites have been used for research and development (R and D), engineering, and testing in a broad range of technical fields primarily in energy research and nuclear reactor technology. The De Soto site had research and development laboratories involved with nuclear research. This work was terminated in 1995 and only D and D activities will have potential for impact on the environment. Since 1956, Area 4 has been used for work with nuclear materials, including fabricating nuclear reactor fuels, testing nuclear reactors, and dissembling used fuel elements. This work ended in 1988 and subsequent efforts have been directed toward decommissioning and decontamination of the former nuclear facilities. The primary purpose of this report is to present information on environmental and effluent monitoring of DOE-sponsored activities to the regulatory agencies responsible for oversight. Information presented here concentrates on Area 4 at SSFL, which is the only area at SSFL where DOE operations were performed.

Robinson, K.S. [ed.

1998-11-23T23:59:59.000Z

267

Does  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Does Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Yu-San Liu Æ Yining Zeng Æ Yonghua Luo Æ Qi Xu Æ Michael E. Himmel Æ Steve J. Smith Æ Shi-You Ding Received: 26 November 2008 / Accepted: 11 May 2009 / Published online: 19 June 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Exoglucanases are key enzymes required for the efficient hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. It has been proposed that exoglucanases hydrolyze cellulose chains in a processive manner to produce primarily cellobiose. Usually, two functional modules are involved in the processive mechanism: a catalytic module and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). In this report, single molecule tracking techniques were used to analyze the molecular motion of CBMs labeled with quantum dots (QDs) and bound to cellulose crystals. By tracking the single QD, we observed that the family 2 CBM from

268

DOE/EIS-0247; Draft Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source, December 1998  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 1998 December 1998 Construction and Operation of the S PALLATION N EUTRON S OURCE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science DOE/EIS-0247 Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source Facility Draft Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science December 1998 DOE/EIS-0247 Draft, December 1998 Cover Sheet COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source (DOE/EIS-0247) LOCATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE SITES: Illinois, New Mexico, New York, and Tennessee. CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. David Wilfert, EIS Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office

269

Expansion of the Volpentest Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response Training and Education Center, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT EXPANSION OF THE VOLPENTEST HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING AND EDUCATION CENTER HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY November 2002 1 November 2002 U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact This page intentionally left blank. 2 November 2002 U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1412, for expanding training and equipment testing facilities at the Volpentest Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response Training and Education Center (HAMMER) on the

270

DOE  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

DOE DOE /E/A- 0202( 83//Q J Sh or t-T er m En er gy O ut lo ok a to m Quar terly Proje ction s Febru ary 1983 Ene rgy Info rma tion Adm inist ratio n Was hing ton, D.C. t rt jrt .or t lor t lor t .lor t- ior t- ior t <.o rt ort . m .er m -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -T erm -T erm -T erm Nrm ue rgy En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y ^n erg y Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Sh ort -T erm 1 Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm

271

Program Overview DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Overview Overview DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal May 13-14, 2003 presented by E. S. Marmar on behalf of the C-Mod Group C Mod Alcator - Physics and Technology Transport Edge/Divertor RF MHD Integrated Thrusts Advanced Tokamak Burning Plasma Support Next Step(s) High Bootstrap, High β N Quasi-Steady State High Field, High Pressure C Mod Alcator - C Mod Alcator - Unique Capabilities ⇒ Address Key Questions * Unique long pulse capability (relative to skin and L/R times) * highly shaped, diverted, high pressure plasma * 5 second pulse length at B = 5 T → Quasi-steady lower hybrid driven AT scenarios * fully relaxed current profiles * High performance, compact, high field capability →Next Step Burning Plasma issues * Tight e-i coupled regimes * H-mode threshold * Pedestal regulation *

272

Supplement Analysis for the System Operation Review EIS (DOE/EIS-0170/SA-1)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20, 2002 20, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the System Operation Review EIS (DOE/EIS-0170/SA-1) Anthony G. White - PGPL-5 Public Utility Specialist and Secretary, United States Entity Proposed Action: Non-Treaty Storage Agreement (NTSA) - Contract Extension, Contract Number DE-MS79- 90BP92754. Proposed By: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and B.C. Hydro and Power Authority (BC Hydro). Location: British Columbia, Canada. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA and BC Hydro propose to extend the existing NTSA for a period of one year. Analysis: On July 5, 1990, BPA and BC Hydro signed the NTSA, which expanded the amount of non- Treaty storage space available in Canada and extended the then-existing agreement from 1993 to

273

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For March 8 to April 11, 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

April 11, 2011 April 11, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project March 10: BBWI, the contractor at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility, received a Notice of Violation from the state of Idaho for $45,192 as a result of noncompliances with the waste acceptance criteria for the AMWTP supercompactor. The waste acceptance criteria prohibits pressurized containers from being treated in the supercompactor. The primary violation involved a charged fire extinguisher - a pressurized container- being treated in the AMWTP supercompactor (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2011-0004).

274

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For November 2 to November 14, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 to November 14, 2010 2 to November 14, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nov. 10: A worker mistakenly allowed a waste drum to be supercompacted at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility without all the proper pre-checks. A non-conformance report was issued, a fact finding held, and all activities involving the Fissile Tracking System were suspended. After the drum was compacted, the assay data was validated and it was determined the drum was acceptable for compaction. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0025).

275

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For June 7 to June 27, 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 to June 27, 2011 7 to June 27, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project June 27: An unanticipated level of dust and debris containing some fissile material accumulated in three areas of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility. Compensatory measures were established for the rooms of concern, and a cleanup and recovery plan is under development. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2011-0008).

276

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Dec. 22, 2009 to Jan. 4, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

22, 2009 to Jan. 4, 2010 22, 2009 to Jan. 4, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Dec. 28: After returning from a shutdown period, workers at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project began assaying waste drums without doing a required inspection of the assay equipment. The shift supervisor placed the assay units in suspension mode and a fact-finding meeting was held. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2009-0015).

277

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For March 8 to March 22, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

March 22, 2010 March 22, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project March 11: Workers at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility determined that the degraded condition of some waste boxes may not meet the expectations of current safety documentation. Interim safety steps, including limiting the retrieval of waste from certain areas, were initiated until an in-depth analysis can be completed. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0009).

278

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For September 14 to September 27, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 to September 27, 2010 4 to September 27, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Sept. 14: While loading drums of transuranic waste into a standard waste box at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project, incorrect data for the drums was entered into the Waste Tracking System. The Waste Tracking System would not accept the data, the shift supervisor was notified and all work was stopped. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0022).

279

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For June 5 to June 18, 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 to June 18, 2012 5 to June 18, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project June 13: A technician performed maintenance on a piece of mechanical equipment at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility without using a required lockout/tagout that would control the hazardous energy presented by the potential mechanical movement of the equipment arm, and the potential activation of the cell CO2 fire suppression system. A fact-finding investigation was ordered. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-0015).

280

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For December 11, 2012 to January 2, 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

11, 2012 to Jan. 2, 2013 11, 2012 to Jan. 2, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Dec. 10: It was discovered that an over-pack waste drum stored at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility had the same barcode number as a waste drum that had been previously shipped to a mixed low-level waste repository. An investigation was initiated and a review undertaken to determine potential duplicate barcode labels on waste containers remaining on site. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-04).

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For August 9 to August 23, 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 to August 23, 2011 9 to August 23, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Aug. 16: A required survey detected radioactive contamination on three support pallets during waste loading processes at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility. No contamination has been found on any of the waste containers in the area. A contamination area and buffer area was established and other surveys taken of the area. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2011-0010).

282

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For February 7 to February 27, 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7, 2012 to February 27, 2012 7, 2012 to February 27, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Feb. 13: While digging a hole for a fence post at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility, a water line was ruptured. A concern was raised that an accompanying heat trace may have been damaged. A 120 volt heat trace was found in the area and, although it was not damaged, its discovery resulted in the categorization of the event as the unexpected discovery of an uncontrolled hazardous energy source. All work was stopped after the leak occurred, and the water line was isolated. The fact that facility drawings were inadequate to identify underground utilities in the area was entered into the issues tracking system for resolution. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-0006).

283

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For August 3 to August 16, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 to August 16, 2010 3 to August 16, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Aug. 4: It was determined that modifications made in remote equipment located at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility were made without consideration of potential impacts on criticality safety. The equipment - floor-mounted manipulators - will remain out of service until a safety evaluation can be completed. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0018).

284

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Sept. 15 to Sept. 28, 2009  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

15 to Sept. 28, 2009 15 to Sept. 28, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Sept. 22: While surveying a trailer at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project, a radiological technician detected contamination on the metal deck of the trailer. The trailer was posted and moved to a contamination area prior to cleanup. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2009-0014).

285

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 15 to June 4, 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 to June 4, 2012 5 to June 4, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project May 15: Required regulatory inspections were not carried out at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility during the week of Nov. 21, 2011. They were completed on Nov. 28, 2011. This was not reported through the ORPS system until May 15. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-0014).

286

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For July 13 to August 2, 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

July 13 to Aug. 2, 2012 July 13 to Aug. 2, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project July 18: While working on a window-mounted air conditioner at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility, a technician drilled a hole in the condensate collection pan and struck a cooling blade. The air conditioner was removed from service. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-0017).

287

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 6 to April 19, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 to April 19, 2010 6 to April 19, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project April 8: A worker assigned to review lock-out/tag out compliance discovered that some maintenance work under way on the Super Compactor Bagless Transfer Port at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility was being performed without the required safety checks. All work involving lock-out/tag-outs was halted until it could be confirmed that the required safety checks had been performed. (EM-ID-BBWI-AMWTF-2010-0011).

288

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Feburary 26, 2013 to March 18, 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6, 2013 to Mar. 18, 2013 6, 2013 to Mar. 18, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project March 6: During inspection, a drum of transuranic material that was scheduled for super-compaction at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility was determined to contain more fissile material than allowed by safety regulations. The drum was placed in administrative hold, and movement of fissile material in the Treatment Facility was stopped pending an investigation. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2013-0005).

289

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For February 28 to March 27, 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

28, 2012 to March 27, 2012 28, 2012 to March 27, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project March 8: Three laborers were moving a safe using a dolly at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility when a wheel of the dolly broke through the floor of the building. Two of the laborers suffered back pain from the incident. Movement of all safes was stopped and plywood was put in place over the damaged floor area. (AMWTF-2012-0009).

290

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For January 29, 2013 to February 11, 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

29, 2013 to Feb. 11, 2013 29, 2013 to Feb. 11, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Feb. 6: On at least two different occasions workers at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility found that filters on their respirators were not functioning properly. The contractor has contacted the manufacturer to help resolve the issue. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2013-0003).

291

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For November 13 to December 10, 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 to Dec. 10, 2012 3 to Dec. 10, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Dec. 1: The Idaho Treatment Group (ITG) is reviewing a draft report looking into issues regarding ITG's implementation and execution of its Issues Management and Performance Improvement Programs. The contractor is conducting a factual accuracy check of the concerns raised by the report and formulating an action plan to address the concerns. (EM-ID-ITG-AMWTF-2012-0023).

292

B3.6 SWCX for Indoor Bench-Scale Research Project and Conventional Lab Operations-  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 SWCX for Indoor Bench-Scale Research Project and Conventional Lab Operations- 6 SWCX for Indoor Bench-Scale Research Project and Conventional Lab Operations- Revision 0 Sitewide Categorical Exclusion for Indoor Bench-Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory Operations Introduction LAs defined in the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Richland Operations Office Integrated Management System Procedure, NEPA Analysis at Hanford, a sitewide categorical exclusion is: An application of DOE categorical exclusions described in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A and B, which may apply to Hanford Site proposed actions (activities) that are "sitewide" in nature and extent, ·which the cognizant DOE Hanford NCO has determined fit \Vithin the scope (i.e., same nature and intent, and of the same or lesser scope) of DOE categorical exclusions described in 10

293

EA-1211: Relocation and Storage of Isotopic Heat Sources, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposal for relocation and storage of the isotopic heat sources at the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site in Richland, Washington.

294

DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Budget and Schedule Budget and Schedule DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal May 13-14, 2003 presented by E. S. Marmar on behalf of the C-Mod Group C Mod Alcator - C Mod Alcator - National Budget Profiles 22,569 96 427 1,934 20,112 FY04 29,887 29,450 28,710 27,610 25,250 National Project Total 137 130 125 120 110 LANL 630 610 585 560 540 U Texas 2,920 2,810 2,700 2,600 2,500 PPPL 26,200 25,900 25,300 24,330 22,100 MIT FY08 FY07 FY06 FY05 FY04 Institution Guidance 5 Year Proposal 2003 2002 Cryopump/Up. Div. Inner Div Up Adv. Tok. n-control, power, long pulse ITB Studies Overview Schedule (Program Planning Budgets) Operations: 25 Run Weeks/Year (04 - 08) Full Facility Utilization RFX Beam CXRS, MSE, BES Calendar Year 2006 2005 2004 Long Pulse Beam Edge Fluctuation Imaging Hard X-Ray Imaging Alcator C-Mod Tang. HIREX Add Horiz Ports

295

DOE-STD-1033-92; Guide to Good Practices for Operations and Administration Updates Through Required Reading  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-92 3-92 December 1992 CHANGE NOTICE NO.1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION UPDATES THROUGH REQUIRED READING U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No.1 DOE-STD-1033-92 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Operations and Administration Updates Through

296

DOE-STD-1032-92 CN 1; Guide to Good Practices for Operations Organization and Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-92 2-92 December 1992 CHANGE NOTICE NO.1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONS ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No.1 DOE-STD-1032-92 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Operations Organization and Administration

297

DOE-STD-1041-93 CN-1; Guide to Good Practices for Shift Routines and Operating Practices  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-93 1-93 June 1998 Change Notice No. 1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR SHIFT ROUTINES AND OPERATING PRACTICES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A:Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No. 1 DOE-STD-1041-93 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Shift Routines and Operating Practices Page / Section Change

298

DOE-HDBK-1002-96; Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-96 2-96 March 1996 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF CHEMICAL OPERATORS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009491 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 FOREWORD The purpose of the Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators is to provide

299

Westinghouse P.O. Box 1970 Hanford COlTlpany Richland, Washington 99352  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Westinghouse P.O. Box 1970 Westinghouse P.O. Box 1970 Hanford COlTlpany Richland, Washington 99352 Hanford Operations and Engineering Contractor for the U S . Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-87RL10930 Approved for Public Release o-vrrorr 91: WHC-MR-0293 Revision 2 _-- Legend and Legacy: Fifty Years of Defense Production at the Hanford Site M. S. Gerber Date Published September 1992 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Manage men t 3 e f e r e n c e WHC-c: INFORMATION RELEASE REEUEST IN 0 Y 3s % - a - - Referencas Available to I n t e n d e d Audience T r a n s m i t to 00E-HQIOffice o f Scienofic and Tacnnical l n f o r m a a o n x u AurhorlRsquestor (PnnredlSignarure) $ & rnS*G&Gec #/L+ f2 lntenaed Audience u a Internal Sponsor s x t e r n

300

Use of Management and Operating or Other Facility Management Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C., Area  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish policies and procedures for management of DOE, including NNSA, Management and Operating (M&O) and other facility management contractor employees assigned to the Washington, D.C., area. Cancels DOE O 350.2.

2003-10-29T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Reservoir characterization of the Mississippian Ratcliffe, Richland County, Montana, Williston Basin. Topical report, September 1997  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This topical report is a compilation of characterizations by different disciplines of the Mississippian Ratcliffe in portions of Richland County, MT. Goals of the report are to increase understanding of the reservoir rocks, oil-in-place, heterogeneity and methods for improved recovery. The report covers investigations of geology, petrography, reservoir engineering and seismic. The Ratcliffe is a low permeability oil reservoir which appears to be developed across much of the study area and occurs across much of the Williston Basin. The reservoir has not been a primary drilling target in the study area because average reserves have been insufficient to payout the cost of drilling and completion despite the application of hydraulic fracture stimulation. Oil trapping does not appear to be structurally controlled. For the Ratcliffe to be a viable drilling objective, methods need to be developed for (1) targeting better reservoir development and (2) better completions. A geological model is presented for targeting areas with greater potential for commercial reserves in the Ratcliffe. This model can be best utilized with the aid of 3D seismic. A 3D seismic survey was acquired and is used to demonstrate a methodology for targeting the Ratcliffe. Other data obtained during the project include oriented core, special formation-imaging log, pressure transient measurements and oil PVT. Although re-entry horizontal drilling was unsuccessfully tested, this completion technology should improve the economic viability of the Ratcliffe. Reservoir simulation of horizontal completions with productivity of three times that of a vertical well suggested two or three horizontal wells in a 258-ha (640-acre) area could recover sufficient reserves for profitable drilling.

Sippel, M.; Luff, K.D.; Hendricks, M.L.

1998-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

DOE/SC-ARM-14-016 ARM Operations and Engineering Procedure Mobile...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Site Log and IOP discussion wiki operational. Figure 3. This graphic shows the Product Tracking to the ARM Data Archive. 7.0 Operation - Operational Start Date Milestone 1....

303

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For March 22 to April 5, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of...

304

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 17 to June 6, 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Idaho Cleanup Project May 19: Liquid nitrogen from tank venting flowed under the work boots of an operator at the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit site, freezing the operator's...

305

DOE Cites Battelle Memorial Institute for Price-Anderson Violations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Memorial Institute for Price-Anderson Violations Memorial Institute for Price-Anderson Violations DOE Cites Battelle Memorial Institute for Price-Anderson Violations January 3, 2008 - 5:04pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to the Battelle Memorial Institute (Battelle) for nuclear safety violations at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Battelle is the managing and operating contractor for PNNL in Richland, Washington. The PNOV today issued a series of violations related to two radiological events that occurred at PNNL during the last year. In December 2006, an airborne release of plutonium from a glovebox in the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory occurred as a result of a split in a vacuum exhaust line caused by an inappropriate modification to the vacuum system. In

306

EA-0993: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, Washington |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

93: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, 93: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, Washington EA-0993: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Site's proposal to place the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) in a radiologically and industrially safe shutdown condition, suitable for a long-term surveillance and maintenance phase prior to final decontamination and decommissioning. This EA addresses the actions associated with Phase I (Facility Transition) and Phase II (Surveillance and Maintenance). PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD May 1, 1995 EA-0993: Finding of No Significant Impact Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility

307

Hydrogen Emergency Response Training for First Responders - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

52 52 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Monte R. Elmore Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Blvd. Richland, WA 99352 Phone: (509) 372-6158 Email: monte.elmore@pnnl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Antonio Ruiz Phone: (202) 586-0729 Email: Antonio.Ruiz@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: * Jennifer Hamilton, California Fuel Cell Partnership (CaFCP), Sacramento, CA * Hanford Fire Department, Richland, WA * Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency

308

Hanford Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration, June 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-22 6-22 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration Dates of Activity : 06/20/2011 - 06/22/2011 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an operational awareness review of the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration. Result: During the period June 20-22, 2011, an HSS representative participated in an operational assessment of the Cold Vacuum

309

Audit Report: WR-B-00-01 | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Audit Report: WR-B-00-01 November 23, 1999 Analytical Laboratory Capabilities at the Hanford Site The Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (Richland) was...

310

SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

SC Systems SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Business Policy and Operations (BPO) BPO Home Leadership Organization Chart .pdf file (195KB) Business Management and Planning (BMP) Division SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Contact Information Business Policy & Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-45/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-0192 F: (301) 903-2481 More Information » SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The SC Systems and Operations Division (SCSO) provides support for the SC HQ users in the areas of operations and maintenance for SC's network infrastructure, operational applications, cyber security, Science web sites and portals, COOP/ disaster recovery, IT property and asset management, and

311

Directions to scanner McCausland Center, Palmetto Health Richland Memorial Hospital  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Directions to scanner McCausland Center, Palmetto Health Richland Memorial Hospital 6 Medical Park light) � Go through next light (Pedestrian crossing light) � Take next right into Heart Hospital and Outpatient surgery lot. Do not park in assigned doctor spaces. � Enter building on Heart Hospital Side (Left

Almor, Amit

312

FY 2007 Operating Plan for DOE--March 16, 2007.xls  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Operating Plan by Appropriation Operating Plan by Appropriation (Dollars in Thousands) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Current Operating Congressional Approp. Plan Request Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and conservation Operation and maintenance........................................... 1,781,242 2,065,474 2,187,943 Construction.................................................................... 31,155 89,030 ---- Total, Energy supply and conservation.............................. 1,812,397 2,154,504 2,187,943 Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology..................................................... -20,000 ---- -58,000 Fossil energy research and development....................... 580,669 592,621 566,801

313

DOE/SC-ARM-12-006 ARM Climate Research Facility Radar Operations...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

in OSS * System(s) performance reviews on a weekly (remote tools) basis * Manage troubleshooting and repairs * Confirm tasking with Operations, Technical Support, and...

314

Energy Department Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Operation of its  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Draft Request for Proposals for Operation Draft Request for Proposals for Operation of its Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Washington Energy Department Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Operation of its Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Washington October 25, 2007 - 3:45pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a draft Request for Proposals (RFP) for prospective contractors who are interested in competing on a full and open basis to manage and operate DOE's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). PNNL is a world-class multi-program national laboratory located in Richland, Washington, whose mission is to deliver science-based solutions for the nation's energy, environmental, and security needs. The draft RFP's Statement of Work highlights the type of work being

315

DOE Order Self Study Modules - 29 CFR 1910.120 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

29 CFR 1910.120 29 CFR 1910.120 HAZARDOUS WASTE OPERATIONS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CENTER Change No: 0 29 CFR 1910.120 Level: Familiar Date: 3/14/05 1 29 CFR 1910.120 HAZARDOUS WASTE OPERATIONS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE FAMILIAR LEVEL _________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to perform the following: 1. Discuss clean-up operations required by the regulation. 2. Discuss corrective actions during clean-up operations covered by the resource conservation and recovery act (RCRA). 3. Discuss operations involving hazardous wastes that are conducted at treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities.

316

Microsoft Word - New Microsoft Word Document (6).docx  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2012 Time: 12:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. (Pacific Standard Time) Location: Richland Public Library - Gallery Room, 955 Northgate Drive, Richland, Washington DOE Richland Operations...

317

Management and Operating (M&O) Contracts | U.S. DOE Office of...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Acquisition and Assistance Management and Operating...

318

Phase I remedial investigation report for the 300-FF-5 operable unit, Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The focus of this remedial investigation (RI) is the 300-FF-5 operable unit, one of five operable units associated with the 300 Area aggregate of the U.S. Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Hanford Site. The 300-FF-5 operable unit is a groundwater operable unit beneath the 300-FF-1, 300-FF-2, and 300-FF-3 source operable units. This operable unit was designated to include all contamination detected in the groundwater and sediments below the water table that emanates from the 300-FF-1, 300-FF-2, and 300-FF-3 operable units (DOE-RL 1990a). In November 1989, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed the 300 Area on the National Priorities List (NPL) contained within Appendix B of the National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP, 53 FR 51391 et seq.). The EPA took this action pursuant to their authority under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA, 42 USC 9601 et seq.). The DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL), the EPA and Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) issued the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement), in May 1989 (Ecology et al. 1992, Rev. 2). This agreement, among other matters, governs all CERCLA efforts at the Hanford Site. In June 1990, a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) workplan for the 300-FF-5 operable unit was issued pursuant to the Tri-Party Agreement.

NONE

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Aug. 18 to Aug. 31, 2009  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

No incidents to report. No incidents to report. Operational Summary Waste shipments: through Aug. 8, 2009, a total of 28,991 cubic meters of stored transuranic waste, 85.35 cubic meters of remote-handled transuranic waste and 1,221 cubic meters of previously buried transuranic waste have been shipped from Idaho to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico for disposal. Idaho Cleanup Project Aug. 13: A front end loader moving soil inside the Advanced Retrieval Project-III facility hit the bucket of an excavator that was in the nearby service bay for repairs. The incident caused a series of events that pushed a ladder about 18 inches into a nearby worker. No one was injured and there was no damage to the equipment. All equipment operations were halted and a "step back" order was initiated by the operations foreman. (EM-ID-CWI-RWMC-2009-0006).

320

Shielded Payload Containers Will Enhance the Safety and Efficiency of the DOE's Remote Handled Transuranic Waste Disposal Operations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) disposal operation currently employs two different disposal methods: one for Contact Handled (CH) waste and another for Remote Handled (RH) waste. CH waste is emplaced in a variety of payload container configurations on the floor of each disposal room. In contrast, RH waste is packaged into a single type of canister and emplaced in pre-drilled holes in the walls of disposal rooms. Emplacement of the RH waste in the walls must proceed in advance of CH waste emplacement. This poses a significant logistical constraint on waste handling operations by requiring significant coordination between waste characterization and preparations for shipping among the various generators. To improve operational efficiency, the Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing a new waste emplacement process for certain RH waste streams that can be safely managed in shielded containers. RH waste with relatively low gamma-emitting activity would be packaged in lead-lined containers, shipped to WIPP in existing certified transportation packages for CH waste, and emplaced in WIPP among the stacks of CH waste containers on the floor of a disposal room. RH waste with high gamma-emitting activity would continue to be emplaced in the boreholes along the walls. The new RH container appears essentially the same as a nominal 208-liter drum, but is built with about 2.5 cm of lead, sandwiched between thick steel sheet. The top and bottom are made of very thick plate steel, for strengthening the package to meet transportation requirements, and provide similar gamma attenuation. This robust configuration provides an overpack for waste that otherwise would be remotely handled. Up to a 3:1 reduction in number of shipments is projected if RH waste were transported in the proposed shielded containers. This paper describes the container design and testing, as well as the regulatory approach used to meet the requirements that apply to WIPP and its associated transportation system. This paper describes the RH transuranic waste inventory that may be candidates for packaging and emplacement in shielded containers. DOE does not propose to use shielded containers to increase the amount of RH waste allowed at WIPP. DOE's approach to gain approval for the transportation of shielded containers and to secure regulatory approval for use of shielded containers from WIPP regulators is discussed. Finally, the paper describes how DOE proposes to count the waste packaged into shielded containers against the RH waste inventory and how this will comply with the volume and radioactivity limitations imposed in the many and sometimes overlapping regulations that apply to WIPP. (authors)

Nelson, R.A. [U. S. Department of Energy, Carlsbad, New Mexico (United States); White, D.S. [Washington Group International, Carlsbad, New Mexico (United States)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Alternative Energy Saving Technology Analysis Report for Richland High School Renovation Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On July 8, 2004, L&S Engineering, Inc. submitted a technical assistance request to Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to help estimate the potential energy savings and cost effectiveness of the solar energy and daylighting design alternatives for Richland High School Renovation Project in Richland, WA. L&S Engineering expected PNNL to evaluate the potential energy savings and energy cost savings, the probable installation costs, incentives or grants to reduce the installed costs and simple payback for the following alternative measures: (1) Daylighting in New Gym; (2) Solar Photovoltaics; (3) Solar Domestic Hot Water Pre-Heat; and (4) Solar Outside Air Pre-Heat Following are the findings of the energy savings and cost-effectiveness analysis of above alternative energy saving technologies.

Liu, Bing

2004-08-09T23:59:59.000Z

322

DOE Site HSPD-12 Card Issuance Performance Measures 10-8-10.xls  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Field Field Sub-Total Savannah River Operations Office / SRS Oak Ridge - ETTP Idaho Operations Office / INL Richland Operations Office / Office of River Protection / Hanford Site Strategic Petroleum Reserve Office / SPR Site National Energy Technology Laboratory Golden Field Office National Renewable Energy Laboratory EMCBC Carlsbad Field Office / Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Portsmouth / Paducah DOE Naval Petroleum Reserves LM - Grand Junction / Ohio / Morgantown / Rocky Flats % of Target Sponsored 98% 99% 100% 96% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 98% 0% 100% % of Target Enrolled 94% 98% 94% 88% 99% 93% 99% 100% 0% 97% 99% 90% 0% 100% % of Target Delivered 90% 97% 93% 80% 89% 89% 98% 100% 0% 97% 91% 90% 0% 96% % of Target Activated 88% 96% 89% 76% 87% 87% 98% 100% 0% 96% 90% 86% 0% 92% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% HSPD-12 Card Issuance -

323

Economics of power plant district and process heating in Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The economic feasibility of utilizing hot water from nuclear reactors to provide district heating for private residences in Richland, Washington, and space and process heating for nearby offices, part of the Hanford Reservation, and the Lamb-Weston potato processing plant is assessed. Specifically, the practicality of using hot water from the Washington Public Power Supply System's WNP-1 reactor, which is currently under construction on the Hanford Reservation, just north of the City of Richland is established. World-wide experience with district heating systems and the advantages of using these systems are described. The GEOCITY computer model used to calculate district heating costs is described and the assumptions upon which the costs are based are presented. District heating costs for the city of Richland, process heating costs for the Lamb-Weston potato processing plant, district heating costs for the Horn Rapids triangle area, and process heating costs for the 300 and 3000 areas are discussed. An economic analysis is discussed and institutional restraints are summarized. (MCW)

Fassbender, L.L.; Bloomster, C.H.

1981-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

Independent Oversight Inspection of Classification and Information Control Programs at the Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 2.2 Authorities ............................................................................... 2 2.3 Guidance ................................................................................. 3 2.4 Training ................................................................................... 3 2.5 Document Reviews ................................................................. 4 2.6 Program Evaluation ................................................................. 4 3.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................ 5 4.0 RATINGS ............................................................................................ 5 5.0 OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT ..................................... 6 APPENDIX A: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

325

Removal of 1,082-Ton Reactor Among Richland Operations Office...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

so the plant can be torn down. Nearly 2,000 capsules of highly radioactive cesium and strontium need to be removed from water-filled storage basins and placed in dry storage....

326

Environmental Monitoring Plan, United States Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes environmental monitoring activities at Hanford Reservation. Attention is focused on effluent monitoring and environmental surveillance. All Hanford contractors reviewed potential sources of contamination. A facility effluent monitoring plan was written for each facility with the potential to release significant quantities of hazardous materials, addressing both radiological and nonradiological effluent monitoring. The environmental surveillance program assesses onsite and offsite environmental impacts and offsite human health exposures. The program monitors air, surface water, sediment, agricultural products, vegetation, soil, and wildlife. In addition, independent onsite surveillance is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of Hanford Site effluent controls in order to comply with applicable environmental standards and regulations.

Not Available

1994-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

327

Power Generation from an Integrated Biomass Reformer and Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SBIR Phase III) - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Quentin Ming (Primary Contact), Patricia Irving InnovaTek, Inc. 3100 George Washington Way, Suite 108 Richland, WA 99354 Phone: (509) 375-1093 Email: ming@innovatek.com DOE Managers HQ: Charles Russomanno Phone: (202) 586-7543 Email: Charles.Russomanno@ee.doe.gov HQ: Kathi Epping Martin Phone: (202) 586-7425 Email: Kathi.Epping@ee.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0004535 Project Start Date: October 1, 2010 Project End Date: September 30, 2013 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Establish the requirements and design for an integrated * fuel cell and fuel processor that will meet the technical and operational needs for distributed energy production. Develop and integrate key system components - *

328

Analysis Results for ARRA Projects: Enabling Fuel Cell Market Transformation - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Jennifer Kurtz (Primary Contact), Keith Wipke, Sam Sprik, Todd Ramsden, Genevieve Saur, and Chris Ainscough National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401-3305 Phone: (303) 275-4061 Email: jennifer.kurtz@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Sara Dillich Phone: (202) 586-7925 Email: Sara.Dillich@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA Project Start Date: August 2009 Project End Date: December 2012, with future evaluations covered under DOE's Technology Validation sub-program Objectives Perform an independent assessment of technology in * real-world operation conditions, focusing on fuel cell

329

Supplemental Requirements for the Use of Management and Operating or Other Facility Management Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C., Area  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Notice supplements review and approval requirements of DOE O 350.2A, Use of Management and Operating (M&O) or Other Facility Management Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C., Area, dated 10-29-03.

2005-10-19T23:59:59.000Z

330

DOE/KEURP site operator program. Year 3, Second Quarter Report, October 1--December 31, 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Kansas State University, with funding support from federal, state, public, and private companies, is participating in the Department of Energy`s Electric Vehicle Site Operator Program. Through participation in this program, Kansas State is displaying, testing, and evaluating electric or hybrid vehicle technology. This participation will provide organizations the opportunity to examine the latest EHV prototypes under actual operating conditions. KSU has purchased several electric cars and proposes to purchase additional electric vehicles. KSU has purchased one G-Van built by Conceptor Industries, Toronto, Canada and has procured two (2) Soleq 1993 Ford EVcort station wagons. During calendar year 1994, the Kansas` electric vehicle program expects to purchase a minimum of four and a maximum of eleven additional electric vehicles. The G-Van was signed in order for the public to be aware that it was an electric vehicle. Financial participants` names have been stenciled on the back door of the van. The Soleq EvCorts have not been signed. In order to demonstrate the technology as feasible, the EvCorts were deliberately not signed. The goal is to generate a public perception that this vehicle is no different from any similar internal combustion engine vehicle. Magnetic signs have been made for special functions to ensure sponsor support is recognized and acknowledged.

Not Available

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

331

Specific Administrative Controls Review at the Hanford Site with EM at DOE-RL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report on its Participation in a Review of Selected Aspects of Nuclear Safety at the Hanford Site Plutonium Finishing Plant, November 29 - December 3, 2010 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in the Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC) at the Hanford Site. The EM-23 review included selected programs at the Hanford Site that are under the auspices of the DOE Richland Operations Office. During the review, Independent Oversight personnel reviewed a few of the SACs applicable to the Plutonium Finishing Plant.

332

Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety and Security Safety and Security Report to the Secretary on the Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1 February 2011 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security HSS Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Department-wide Action Plan for the Columbia Accident and Davis-Besse Event ........... 3 3.0 Comprehensive Operating Experience Program ................................................................. 5

333

Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety and Security Safety and Security Report to the Secretary on the Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1 February 2011 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security HSS Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Department-wide Action Plan for the Columbia Accident and Davis-Besse Event ........... 3 3.0 Comprehensive Operating Experience Program ................................................................. 5

334

DOE/EA-1647: Finding of No Significant for the Proposed Construction and Operation of a Cellulosic Ethanol Plant, Treutlen County, Georgia (01/14/09)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

93 93 January 14, 2009 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT for the PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A CELLULOSIC ETHANOL PLANT, TREUTLEN COUNTY, GEORGIA SUMMARY: In October 2007, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) completed an environmental assessment (EA) that analyzed the potential impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed cellulosic ethanol plant in Treutlen County, Georgia. Subsequent to the issuance of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the October 2007 EA, changes were proposed for the design and operating parameters of the facility. In compliance with NEPA (42 U.S. Code [USe] §§ 4321 et seq.) and DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (10 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Section 1021.330) and procedures, DOE completed a supplemental environmental assessment (SEA) to examine the potential environmental impacts associated with

335

DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01; Supplement Analysis for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oakland Operations Office, Oakland, California Oakland Operations Office, Oakland, California 6833/(0(17 $1$/<6,6 147 &RQWLQXHG 2SHUDWLRQ RI /DZUHQFH /LYHUPRUH 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRU\ DQG 6DQGLD 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRULHV /LYHUPRUH 9ROXPH , 0DLQ 5HSRUW March 1999 DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01 6833/(0(17 $1$/<6,6 147 &RQWLQXHG 2SHUDWLRQ RI /DZUHQFH /LYHUPRUH 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRU\ DQG 6DQGLD 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRULHV /LYHUPRUH 9ROXPH , 0DLQ 5HSRUW March 1999 DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01 Supplement Analysis March 1999 iii CONTENTS NOTATION......................................................................................................................... vii SUMMARY......................................................................................................................... S-1 1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................

336

Responses to Frequently Asked Questions on DOE O 232.2, Occurrence Reporting and Processing of Operations Information  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The intent of the Responses to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on DOE O 232.2 is to provide additional insights for DOE facility personnel consideration and judgment when categorizing reportable occurrences in accordance with the Occurrence Reporting Criteria contained in DOE O 232.2.

337

SITEWIDE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION fOR SITING, CONSTRUCI1NG, MODIFYING, AND OPERATING SMALL-SCALE STRUcrURES, PACIfiC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 SITEWIDE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION fOR SITING, CONSTRUCI1NG, MODIFYING, AND OPERATING SMALL-SCALE STRUcrURES, PACIfiC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON Proposed Action: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) proposes to site, construct, modify, and operate small-scale support buildings and structures. Location of Action: The proposed action would occur on the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Site and in the vicinity ofPNNL facilities in the State of Washington. Description of tbe Proposed Action: DOE proposes to site, construct, modify, and/or operate small-scale support structures. Siting and construction activities would generally be limited to small facilities and support structures, such as parking areas and storage facilities, that are within or

338

LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP AT DOE HANFORD SITE - 12575  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site is located in southeast Washington and consists of 1,518 square kilometers (586 square miles) of land. Established in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project, Hanford workers produced plutonium for our nation's nuclear defense program until the mid 1980's. Since then, the site has been in cleanup mode that is being accomplished in phases. As we achieve remedial objectives and complete active cleanup, DOE will manage Hanford land under the Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) Program until completion of cleanup and the site becomes ready for transfer to the post cleanup landlord - currently planned for DOE's Office of Legacy Management (LM). We define Hanford's LTS Program in the ''Hanford Long-Term Stewardship Program Plan,'' (DOE/RL-201 0-35)[1], which describes the scope including the relationship between the cleanup projects and the LTS Program. DOE designed the LTS Program to manage and provide surveillance and maintenance (S&M) of institutional controls and associated monitoring of closed waste sites to ensure the protection of human health and the environment. DOE's Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and Hanford cleanup and operations contractors collaboratively developed this program over several years. The program's scope also includes 15 key activities that are identified in the DOE Program Plan (DOE/RL-2010-35). The LTS Program will transition 14 land segments through 2016. The combined land mass is approximately 570 square kilometers (220 square miles), with over 1,300 active and inactive waste sites and 3,363 wells. Land segments vary from buffer zone property with no known contamination to cocooned reactor buildings, demolished support facilities, and remediated cribs and trenches. DOE-RL will transition land management responsibilities from cleanup contractors to the Mission Support Contract (MSC), who will then administer the LTS Program for DOE-RL. This process requires an environment of cooperation between the contractors and DOE-RL. Information Management (IM) is a key part of the LTS program. The IM Program identifies, locates, stores, protects and makes accessible Hanford LTS records and data to support the transfer of property ultimately to LM. As such, DOE-RL manages the Hanford LTS Program in a manner consistent with LM's goals, policies, and procedures.

MOREN RJ; GRINDSTAFF KD

2012-01-11T23:59:59.000Z

339

Ray J. Corey- Biography  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Ray Corey currently serves as the Assistance Manager for Safety and Environment at the DOE Richland Operations office (RL).

340

DOE/ex-oooos CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION HANFORD PATROL 200 EAST AREA BUILDING  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ex-oooos ex-oooos CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION HANFORD PATROL 200 EAST AREA BUILDING (PROJECT S-227) HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON PROPOSED ACTION The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to construct an insulated concrete form office building in 200 East Area. The proposed facility provides operational support staff office space and parking for government and private vehicles. LOCATION OF ACTION The location of the proposed action is in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Site. The proposed new building will be directly east of the 2721-E Building. The parking lot will be located south of the proposed new building and south of the 2727-E Building. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action will construct a 12,000 square foot insulated concrete form building to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Evaluation of Machine Guarding course taught in Richland, Washington, September 1--3, 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This section summarizes trainee evaluations for the Safety Training Section course, ``Machine Guarding`` which was conducted September 1-3, 1992 in Richland, Washington. This was the fifth time the course has been taught. This report summarizes the quantitative course evaluations that trainees provided upon completion of the course. Sections 1.3 and 1.4 provide written comments and examination results. Also provided are instructors` suggestions for improvement. Ratings were generally high, especially for the section on Subpart 0 guarding, which was consistent with the trainees` comments. Most of the trainees wanted a more in-depth look at Machine Guarding regulations. Lockout/ragout information and more site tours were frequently requested. In addition, the trainees were not interested in the subsection on personal protective equipment and electrical regulations.

Wright, T.S.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

Evaluation of Machine Guarding course taught in Richland, Washington, September 1--3, 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This section summarizes trainee evaluations for the Safety Training Section course, Machine Guarding'' which was conducted September 1-3, 1992 in Richland, Washington. This was the fifth time the course has been taught. This report summarizes the quantitative course evaluations that trainees provided upon completion of the course. Sections 1.3 and 1.4 provide written comments and examination results. Also provided are instructors' suggestions for improvement. Ratings were generally high, especially for the section on Subpart 0 guarding, which was consistent with the trainees' comments. Most of the trainees wanted a more in-depth look at Machine Guarding regulations. Lockout/ragout information and more site tours were frequently requested. In addition, the trainees were not interested in the subsection on personal protective equipment and electrical regulations.

Wright, T.S.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

343

DOE Launches Natural Gas Infrastructure R&D Program Enhancing Pipeline and Distribution System Operational Efficiency, Reducing Methane Emissions  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Following the White House and the Department of Energy Capstone Methane Stakeholder Roundtable on July 29th, DOE announced a series of actions, partnerships, and stakeholder commitments to help modernize the nations natural gas transmission and distribution systems and reduce methane emissions. Through common-sense standards, smart investments, and innovative research, DOE seeks to advance the state of the art in natural gas system performance. DOEs effort is part of the larger Administrations Climate Action Plan Interagency Strategy to Reduce Methane Emissions.

344

Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA (DOE/EA-1442) (12/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California December 2002 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Oakland Operations Office EA for the Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at LLNL ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), has responsibility for national programs to reduce and counter threats from weapons of mass destruction including nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (bioweapons). NNSA's bioscience work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in support of these missions requires work with infectious agents, including those historically used for bioweapons.

345

U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1958 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/EA-1958 DOE/EA-1958 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO THE WILLIAM R. WILEY ENVIRONMENTAL MOLECULAR SCIENCES LABORATORY, PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON (DOE/EA-1958) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF SCIENCE, PACIFIC NORTHWEST SITE OFFICE Finding of No Significant Impact July 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1958 This page intentionally left blank. Finding of No Significant Impact July 2013

346

DOE/EA-  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA- EA- 0904 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACCESS ROAD FROM STATE ROIYFE 240 TO THE 200 WEST AREA HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FEBRUARY 1994 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United Stata Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their * employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- once herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom. mendation, or favoring by the United States Government

347

Independent Activity Report, Hanford - May 2010 | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

visit to the Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington during the period May 17-19, with DOE-RL managersstaff...

348

TBU-0026- In the Matter of Charles L. Evans  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Charles Evans, a former employee of Fluor Hanford Inc. (Fluor), a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, appeals the DOE Richland Operations Office=s (Richland) dismissal of the whistleblower...

349

Management of Hanford Site non-defense production reactor spent nuclear fuel, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) needs to provide radiologically, and industrially safe and cost-effective management of the non-defense production reactor spent nuclear fuel (SNF) at the Hanford Site. The proposed action would place the Hanford Site`s non-defense production reactor SNF in a radiologically- and industrially-safe, and passive storage condition pending final disposition. The proposed action would also reduce operational costs associated with storage of the non-defense production reactor SNF through consolidation of the SNF and through use of passive rather than active storage systems. Environmental, safety and health vulnerabilities associated with existing non-defense production reactor SNF storage facilities have been identified. DOE has determined that additional activities are required to consolidate non-defense production reactor SNF management activities at the Hanford Site, including cost-effective and safe interim storage, prior to final disposition, to enable deactivation of facilities where the SNF is now stored. Cost-effectiveness would be realized: through reduced operational costs associated with passive rather than active storage systems; removal of SNF from areas undergoing deactivation as part of the Hanford Site remediation effort; and eliminating the need to duplicate future transloading facilities at the 200 and 400 Areas. Radiologically- and industrially-safe storage would be enhanced through: (1) removal from aging facilities requiring substantial upgrades to continue safe storage; (2) utilization of passive rather than active storage systems for SNF; and (3) removal of SNF from some storage containers which have a limited remaining design life. No substantial increase in Hanford Site environmental impacts would be expected from the proposed action. Environmental impacts from postulated accident scenarios also were evaluated, and indicated that the risks associated with the proposed action would be small.

NONE

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

350

DOE/EIS-0075-SA-02: Operational and Engineering Modifications and Regulatory Review Supplemental Analysis of Site-Specific and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statements (September 2009)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS OF SITE-SPECIFIC AND PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS: OPERATIONAL AND ENGINEERING MODIFICATIONS, AND REGULATORY REVIEW U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve 900 Commerce Road East New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 September 2009 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Page 3 of 51 Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office under Contract No. DE-AC96-03PO92207 DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company 850 South Clearview Parkway New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 Page 4 of 51 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Table of Contents I. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 6

351

Environmental Assessment for the Transfer of 1100 AREA, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared to assess potential environmental impacts associated with the U.S. Department of Energy's proposed action: the transfer of the 1100 Area, southern rail connection and rolling stock to a non-federal entity. Impact information contained herein will be used by the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office Manager, to determine if the proposed action is a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. If the proposed action is determined to be major and significant, an environmental impact statement will be prepared. If the proposed action is determined not to be major and significant, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) will be issued and the action can proceed. Criteria used to evaluate significance can be found in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1508.27. This EA was prepared in compliance with the ''National Environmental Policy Act'' (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508), and the U.S. Department of Energy Implementing Procedures for NEPA (10 CFR 1021). The following is a description of each section of the EA. (1) Purpose and Need for Action. This provides a brief statement concerning the problem or opportunity the U.S. Department of Energy is addressing with the proposed action. As necessary, background information is provided. (2) Description of the Proposed Action. A description with sufficient detail to identify potential environmental impacts is provided. (3) Alternatives to the Proposed Action. Reasonable alternative actions, which would address the Purpose and Need, are described. A no action alternative, as required by 10 CFR 1021, also is described. (4) Affected Environment. This provides a brief description of the locale in which the proposed action takes place, and which may be environmentally impacted. (5) Environmental Impacts. The range of environmental impacts, beneficial and adverse, are described for the proposed action. Impacts of alternatives briefly are discussed. (6) Permits and Regulatory Requirements. A brief description of permits and regulatory requirements for the proposed action is provided. (7) Organizations Consulted. Any outside agencies, groups, or individuals contacted as part of environmental assessment documentation preparation are listed. (8) References. Documents used to provide information or data are listed. The appendices contain additional information necessary to support an understanding of the proposed action, alternatives, and potential impacts is provided. Comments resulting from review of the environmental assessment by states and tribes or other stakeholders and the response to those comments will be included in the appendices.

N /A

1998-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

352

EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, WA DOE announces the availability of its Final Tank Closure and Waste Management EIS for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (Final TC & WM EIS, DOE/EIS-0391), prepared pursuant NEPA. This Final EIS addresses all public comments on the Draft TC & WM EIS, which was issued in October 2009, and identifies DOE's preferred alternatives. EIS-0391-FEIS-DOENOA-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications Application to Export Electric Energy OE Docket No. EA-387 Energia Renovable S.C., LLC: Federal Register Notice, Volume 77, No. 241 - Dec. 14, 2012

353

EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0391: DOE Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, WA DOE announces the availability of its Final Tank Closure and Waste Management EIS for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (Final TC & WM EIS, DOE/EIS-0391), prepared pursuant NEPA. This Final EIS addresses all public comments on the Draft TC & WM EIS, which was issued in October 2009, and identifies DOE's preferred alternatives. EIS-0391-FEIS-DOENOA-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications Application to Export Electric Energy OE Docket No. EA-387 Energia Renovable S.C., LLC: Federal Register Notice, Volume 77, No. 241 - Dec. 14, 2012 EIS-0391: EPA Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact

354

Operational Readiness Review Final Report for K Basin Fuel Transfer System  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An Operational Readiness Review (ORR) was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office (RL) to verify that an adequate state of readiness had been achieved for startup of the K Basin Fuel Transfer System (FTS). The DOE ORR was conducted during the period November 6-18, 2002. The DOE ORR team concluded that the K Basin Fuel Transfer System is ready to start operations, subject to completion and verification of identified pre-start findings. The ORR was conducted in accordance with the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) K Basin Fuel Transfer System (FTS) Operational Readiness Review (ORR) Plan of Action and the Operational Readiness Review Implementation Plan for K Basin Fuel Transfer System. Review activities consisted of staff interviews, procedure and document reviews, and observations of normal facility operations, operational upset conditions, and an emergency drill. The DOE ORR Team also reviewed and assessed the adequacy of the contractor ORR3 and the RL line management review. The team concurred with the findings and observations identified in these two reports. The DOE ORR for the FTS evaluated the contractor under single-shift operations. Of concern to the ORR Team was that SNF Project management intended to change from a single-shift FTS operation to a two-shift operation shortly after the completion of the DOE ORR. The ORR team did not assess two-shift FTS operations and the ability of the contractor to conduct a smooth transition from shift to shift. However, the DOE ORR team did observe an operational upset drill that was conducted during day shift and carried over into swing shift; during this drill, swing shift was staffed with fewer personnel as would be expected for two-shift operations. The facility was able to adequately respond to the event with the reduced level of staff. The ORR Team was also able to observe a Shift Manager turnover meeting when one shift manager had to be relieved during the middle of the day. The ORR Team did not have the opportunity to observe a shift turnover from one crew to another. The ORR Team has evaluated the risk of not observing this activity and considers the risk to be minimal based on the fact that operating staff are very familiar with the FTS equipment and its procedures, and because existing Conduct of Operations processes and procedures are adequate and implemented. Because the ORR Team has not observed two-shift FTS operations, we recommend that additional RL oversight be provided at the start of two-shift FTS operations to evaluate the adequacy of crew turnovers.

DAVIES, T.H.

2002-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

355

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL July 2001  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) a monthly summary of the Project Hanford Management Contractor's (PHMC) Environmental Management (EM) performance by Fluor Hanford (FH) and its subcontractors. In addition to project-specific information, it includes some PHMC-level data not detailed elsewhere in the report. Section A, Executive Summary, provides an executive level summary of the cost, schedule, and technical performance described in this report. It summarizes performance for the period covered, highlights areas worthy of management attention, and provides a forward look to some of the upcoming key performance activities as extracted from the PHMC baseline. The remaining sections provide detailed performance data relative to each individual Project (e.g., Waste Management, Spent Nuclear Fuels, etc.), in support of Section A of the report. Unless otherwise noted, the Safety, Conduct of Operations, and Cost/Schedule data contained herein is as of May 31,2001. All other information is updated as of June 27,2001 unless otherwise noted. ''Stoplight'' boxes are used to indicate at a glance the condition of a particular area. Green boxes denote on schedule. Yellows denote behind schedule but recoverable. Red is either missed or unrecoverable.

EDER, D.M.

2001-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

356

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL May 2001  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) a monthly summary of the Project Hanford Management Contractor's (PHMC) Environmental Management (EM) performance by Fluor Hanford (FH) and its subcontractors. In addition to project-specific information, it includes some PHMC-level data not detailed elsewhere in the report. Section A, Executive Summary, provides an executive level summary of the cost, schedule, and technical performance described in this report. It summarizes performance for the period covered, highlights areas worthy of management attention, and provides a forward look to some of the upcoming key performance activities as extracted from the PHMC baseline. The remaining sections provide detailed performance data relative to each individual Project (e g , Waste Management, Spent Nuclear Fuels, etc.), in support of Section A of the report. Unless otherwise noted, the Safety, Conduct of Operations, and Cost/Schedule data contained herein is as of March 31, 2001. All other information is updated as of April 26, 2001 unless otherwise noted. ''Stoplight'' boxes are used to indicate at a glance the condition of a particular area. Green boxes denote on schedule. Yellows denote behind schedule but recoverable. Red is either missed or unrecoverable.

EDER, D.M.

2001-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

357

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL April 2001  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) a monthly summary of the Project Hanford Management Contractor's (PHMC) Environmental Management (EM) performance by Fluor Hanford (FH) and its subcontractors. In addition to project-specific information, it includes some PHMC-level data not detailed elsewhere in the report. Section A, Executive Summary, provides an executive level summary of the cost, schedule, and technical performance described in this report. It summarizes performance for the period covered, highlights areas worthy of management attention, and provides a forward look to some of the upcoming key performance activities as extracted from the PHMC baseline. The remaining sections provide detailed performance data relative to each individual Project (e.g., Waste Management, Spent Nuclear Fuels, etc.), in support of Section A of the report. Unless otherwise noted, the Safety, Conduct of Operations, and Cost/Schedule data contained herein is as of February 28, 2001. All other information is updated as of March 26, 2001 unless otherwise noted. ''Stoplight'' boxes are used to indicate at a glance the condition of a particular area. Green boxes denote on schedule. Yellows denote behind schedule but recoverable. Red is either missed or unrecoverable.

EDER, D.M.

2001-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

358

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL March 2001  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) a monthly summary of the Project Hanford Management Contractor's (PHMC) Environmental Management (EM) performance by Fluor Hanford (FH) and its subcontractors. In addition to project-specific information, it includes some PHMC-level data not detailed elsewhere in the report. Section A, Executive Summary, provides an executive level summary of the cost, schedule, and technical performance described in this report. It summarizes performance for the period covered, highlights areas worthy of management attention, and provides a forward look to some of the upcoming key performance activities as extracted from the PHMC baseline. The remaining sections provide detailed performance data relative to each individual Project (e.g., Waste Management, Spent Nuclear Fuels, etc.), in support of Section A of the report. Unless otherwise noted, the Safety, Conduct of Operations, and Cost/Schedule data contained herein is as of January 31, 2001. All other information is updated as of February 20, 2001 unless otherwise noted. ''Stoplight'' boxes are used to indicate at a glance the condition of a particular area. Green boxes denote on schedule. Yellows denote behind schedule but recoverable. Red is either missed or unrecoverable.

EDER, D.M.

2001-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Implementation of the Clean Air Act, Title V operating permit program requirements for the U.S. DOE Oak Ridge Reservation facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Title V of the Clean Air Act (CAA) establishes a new permit program requiring major sources and sources subject to Title III (Hazardous Air Pollutants) to obtain a state operating permit. Historically, most states have issued operating permits for individual emission units. Under the Title V permit program, a single permit will be issued for all of the emission units at the facility much like the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. The permit will specify all reporting, monitoring, and record-keeping requirements for the facility. Sources required to obtain permits include (a) major sources that emit 100 tons per year or more of any criteria air contaminant, (b) any source subject to the HAP provisions of Title III, (c) any source subject to the acid rain provisions of Title IV, (d) any source subject to New Source Performance Standards, and (e) any source subject to new source review under the nonattainment or Prevention of Significant Deterioration provisions. The State of Tennessee Title V Operating Permit Program was approved by EPA on August 28, 1996. This paper will provide details of initiatives underway at US Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) Facilities for implementation of requirements under the Title V Operating Permit Program. The ORR encompasses three DOE Facilities: the Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP). The Y-12 Plant manufactures component parts for the national nuclear weapons program; the ORNL is responsible for research and development activities including nuclear engineering, engineering technologies, and the environmental sciences; and the ETTP conducts a variety of research and development activities and is the home of a mixed waste incinerator. Each of the three DOE Facilities is considered a major source under Title V of the CAA.

Humphreys, M.P. [Dept. of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, TN (United States). Environmental Protection Div.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

360

Overview and History of DOE's Hanford Site - 12502  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Hanford's DOE offices are responsible for one of the largest nuclear cleanup efforts in the world, cleaning up the legacy of nearly five decades of nuclear weapons production. Nowhere in the DOE Complex is cleanup more challenging than at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington. Hanford cleanup entails remediation of hundreds of large complex hazardous waste sites; disposition of nine production reactors and the preservation of one as a National Historic Landmark; demolition of hundreds of contaminated facilities including five enormous process canyons; remediation of billions of gallons of contaminated groundwater; disposition of millions of tons of low-level, mixed low-level, and transuranic waste; disposition of significant quantities of special nuclear material; storage and ultimate disposition of irradiated nuclear fuel; remediation of contamination deep in the soil that could impact groundwater; decontamination and decommissioning of hundreds of buildings and structures; and treatment of 56 million gallons of radioactive waste in 177 large underground tanks through the construction of a first-of-its-kind Waste Treatment Plant. Cleanup of the Hanford Site is a complex and challenging undertaking. The DOE Richland Operations Office has a vision and a strategy for completing Hanford's cleanup including the transition to post-cleanup activities. Information on the strategy is outlined in the Hanford Site Completion Framework. The framework describes three major components of cleanup - River Corridor, Central Plateau, and Tank Waste. It provides the context for individual cleanup actions by describing the key challenges and approaches for the decisions needed to complete cleanup. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), as regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), is implementing a strategy to achieve final cleanup decisions for the River Corridor portion of the Hanford Site. The DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) and DOE Office of River Protection (ORP) have prepared this document to describe the strategy and to begin developing the approach for making cleanup decisions for the remainder of the Hanford Site. DOE's intent is that the Completion Framework document will facilitate dialogue among the Tri-Parties and with Hanford's diverse interest groups, including Tribal Nations, State of Oregon, Hanford Advisory Board, Natural Resource Trustees, and the public. Future cleanup decisions will be enhanced by an improved understanding of the challenges facing cleanup and a common understanding of the goals and approaches for cleanup completion. The overarching goals for cleanup are sevenfold. - Goal 1: Protect the Columbia River. - Goal 2: Restore groundwater to its beneficial use to protect human health, the environment, and the Columbia River. - Goal 3: Clean up River Corridor waste sites and facilities to: Protect groundwater and the Columbia River. Shrink the active cleanup footprint to the Central Plateau, and support anticipated future uses of the land. - Goal 4: Clean up Central Plateau waste sites, tank farms, and facilities to: Protect groundwater. Minimize the footprint of areas requiring long-term waste management activities. Support anticipated future uses of the land. - Goal 5: Safely manage and transfer legacy materials scheduled for off-site disposition including special nuclear material (including plutonium), spent nuclear fuel, transuranic waste, and immobilized high-level waste. - Goal 6: Consolidate waste treatment, storage, and disposal operations on the Central Plateau. - Goal 7: Develop and implement institutional controls and long-term stewardship activities that protect human health, the environment, and Hanford's unique cultural, historical and ecological resources after cleanup activities are completed. These goals embody more than 20 years of dialogue among the Tri-Party Agencies, Tribal Nations, State of Oregon, stakeholders, and the public. They carry forward key values captured in forums such as the Hanford Future Site Uses

Flynn, Karen; McCormick, Matt [US DOE (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Construction and Operation of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), California (DOE/EA-1426) (2/28/03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), California. AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1426, evaluating the proposed action to construct and operate the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC). Based upon the information and analyses in the EA, the DOE has determined that the proposed federal action does not significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

362

Maintenance and operation of the U.S. DOE Alternative Fuel Center. Final subcontract report, 5 August 1994--4 August 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Alternative Fuel Center (AFC) was established by the US Department of Energy (DOE) as part of the Alternative Fuel Utilization Program (AFUP). The AFC is designed to provide drum quantities of finished transportation fuels from a variety of sources. DOE funded the design, construction, and installation of a hydrogenation pilot plant capable of performing a range of hydrotreating, reforming, and hydrocracking operations. Southwest Research Institute provided the building, utilities, and laboratory and safety systems needed for the pilot plant. The AFC work reported here contributes to the two primary objectives of the AFUP: data for alternative-fuel-capable vehicles to enhance energy security, and data for controlling emissions for improved air quality.

Erwin, J.; Moulton, D.S. [Southwest Research Inst., San Antonio, TX (United States)

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

363

DOE-NE Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program and EPRI Long-Term Operations Program Joint Research and Development Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Nuclear power has contributed almost 20% of the total amount of electricity generated in the United States over the past two decades. High capacity factors and low operating costs make nuclear power plants (NPPs) some of the most economical power generators available. Further, nuclear power remains the single largest contributor (nearly 70%) of non-greenhouse gas-emitting electric power generation in the United States. Even when major refurbishments are performed to extend operating life, these plants continue to represent cost-effective, low-carbon assets to the nations electrical generation capability.

Don Williams

2014-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

364

DOE/EIS-0380: 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory Mitigation Action Plan (December 2008)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Title: Title: 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory (DOE/EIS 0380) Mitigation Action Plan U.S. Department of Energy Date: December 2008 Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer, is operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC52-06NA25396. By acceptance of this article, the publisher recognizes that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. Los Alamos National Laboratory requests that the publisher identify this

365

Environmental consequences of postulated plutonium releases from Exxon Nuclear MOFP, Richland, Washington, as a result of severe natural phenomena  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Potential environmental consequences in terms of radiation dose to people are presented for postulated plutonium releases caused by severe natural phenomena at the Exxon Nuclear Company Mixed Oxide Fabrication Plant (MOFP), Richland, Washington. The severe natural phenomena considered are earthquakes, tornadoes, high straight-line winds, and floods. Maximum plutonium deposition values are given for significant locations around the site. All important potential exposure pathways are examined. The most likely 50-year committed dose equivalents are given for the maximum-exposed individual and the population within a 50-mile radius of the plant. The maximum plutonium deposition values most likely to occur offsite are also given.

Jamison, J.D.; Watson, E.C.

1980-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Phase 1 remedial investigation report for 200-BP-1 operable unit. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site, in Washington State is organized into numerically designated operational areas including the 100, 200, 300, 400, 600, and 1100 Areas. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in November 1989 included the 200 Areas of the Hanford Site on the National Priority List (NPL) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Inclusion on the NPL initiated the remedial investigation (RD process for the 200-BP-1 operable unit. These efforts are being addressed through the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Ecology et al. 1989) which was negotiated and approved by the DOE, the EPA, and the State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) in May 1989. This agreement, known as the Tri-Party Agreement, governs all CERCLA efforts at Hanford. In March of 1990, the Department of Energy, Richland Operations (DOE-RL) issued a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) work plan (DOE-RL 1990a) for the 200-BP-1 operable unit. The work plan initiated the first phase of site characterization activities associated with the 200-BP-1 operable unit. The purpose of the 200-BP-1 operable unit RI is to gather and develop the necessary information to adequately understand the risks to human health and the environment posed by the site and to support the development and analysis of remedial alternatives during the FS. The RI analysis will, in turn, be used by Tri-Party Agreement signatories to make a risk-management-based selection of remedies for the releases of hazardous substances that have occurred from the 200-BP-1 operable unit.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

Microsoft Word - 090512MSCupdate.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office issued a Notice to Proceed to Mission Support Alliance, LLC. DOE had previously announced the selection for the mission support contractor....

368

DOE Backup Power Working Group Best Practices Handbook for Maintenance and Operation of Engine Generators, Volume II  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The lubricating oil system provides a means to introduce a lubricant in the form of a film to reduce friction and wear between surfaces that bear against each other as they move.1 The oil film which is established also cools the parts by carrying generated heat away from hot surfaces, cleans and carries dirt or metal wear particles to the filter media, and helps seal the piston to the cylinder during combustion. Most systems are pressure lubricated and distribute oil under pressure to bearings, gears, and power assemblies. Lubricating oil usually reaches main, connecting rod, and camshaft bearings through drilled passages in the cylinder block and crankshaft or through piping and common manifolds.Many parts rely on oil for cooling, so if the lube oil system fails to perform its function the engine will overheat. Metal to metal surfaces not separated by a thin film of oil rapidly build up frictional heat. As the metals reach their melting point, they tend to weld together in spots or streaks. Lube oil system failures can cause significant damage to an engine in a short period of time. Proper maintenance and operation of the lubricating oil system is essential if your engine is to accomplish its mission.

Gross, R.E.

1998-10-30T23:59:59.000Z

369

DOE Approved Technical Standards | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the safe operation of DOE's defense nuclear facilities. 09302014 DOE-HDBK-1214-2014 Conduct of Operations Assessment Field Handbook This handbook is designed to assist in...

370

DOE Explosives Safety Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Manual describes DOE's explosives safety requirements applicable to operations involving the development, testing, handling, and processing of explosives or assemblies containing explosives.

1996-03-29T23:59:59.000Z

371

the DOE ISMS Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

* Corrective action management * Environmental management * Commercial grade dedication * Conduct of operations "This ISMS review by DOE goes beyond ensuring that we have a...

372

DOE/EA-1647: Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the Construction and Operation of a Proposed Cellulosic Ethanol Plant, Range Fuels Soperton Plant, LLC (January 2009)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

S S u p p l e m e n t a l E n v i r o n m e n t a l A s s e s s m e n t a n d N o t i c e o f W e t l a n d s I n v o l v e m e n t Construction and Operation of a Proposed Cellulosic Ethanol Plant, Range Fuels Soperton Plant, LLC (formerly Range Fuels Inc.) Treutlen County, Georgia DOE/EA 1647 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy January 2009 Contents Section Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................... v 1.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ..........................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action ..........................................................2

373

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-02): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 3/9/01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3/09/01 3/09/01 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-02) Bill Erickson - TFP/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Danger tree clearing on nine ROWs. Locations are: the Franklin-Badger Canyon #2; Hedges Tap; White Bluffs-Richland; Grandview-Richland; Badger Canyon-Richland; Franklin- Riverview; Taylor Flats Tap; Walla Walla-Pendleton; and McNary-Slatt Transmission lines. Location: All ROWs are located in the Walla Walla Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear danger trees from varying widths of the indicated transmission line rights-of way that are approaching electrical clearance zones in

374

CX-006067: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office The DOE's Richland Operations Office and Office of River Protection propose to conduct indoor bench-scale research, conventional laboratory operations, and small-scale...

375

Maintenance and operations contractor plan for transition to the project Hanford management contract (PHMC)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This plan has been developed by Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC), and its subcontractors ICF Kaiser Hanford (ICF KH) and BCS Richland, Inc. (BCSR), at the direction of the US Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office (RL). WHC and its subcontractors are hereafter referred to as the Maintenance and Operations (M and O) Contractor. The plan identifies actions involving the M and O Contractor that are critical to (1) prepare for a smooth transition to the Project Hanford Management Contractor (PHMC), and (2) support and assist the PHMC and RL in achieving transition as planned, with no or minimal impact to ongoing baseline activities. The plan is structured around two primary phases. The first is the pre-award phase, which started in mid-February 1996 and is currently scheduled to be completed on June 1, 1996, at which time the contract is currently planned to be awarded. The second is the follow-on four-month post-award phase from June 1, 1996, until October 1, 1996. Considering the magnitude and complexity of the scope of work being transitioned, completion in four months will require significant effort by all parties. To better ensure success, the M and O Contractor has developed a pre-award phase that is intended to maximize readiness for transition. Priority is given to preparation for facility assessments and processing of personnel, as these areas are determined to be on the critical path for transition. In addition, the M and O Contractor will put emphasis during the pre-award phase to close out open items prior to contract award, to include grievances, employee concerns, audit findings, compliance issues, etc.

Waite, J.L.

1996-04-12T23:59:59.000Z

376

Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for Expansion and Operation of the Central Shops Borrow Pit at the Savannah River Site (DOE/EA-1194)(10/29/03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for Expansion and Operation of the Central Shops Borrow Pit at the Savannah River Site Agency: U. S. Department of Energy Action: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1194) in 1997 for the expansion and operation of the existing Central Shops Borrow Pit (i.e., SRS Facility 632-G) at the Savannah River Site (SRS), located near Aiken, South Carolina. This EA was prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended; the requirements of the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing NEPA (40 CFR 15400-1508); and the DOE Regulations for Implementing NEPA (10 CFR 1021). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that

377

Environmental assessment of SP-100 ground engineering system test site: Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to modify an existing reactor containment building (decommissioned Plutonium Recycle Test Reactor (PRTR) 309 Building) to provide ground test capability for the prototype SP-100 reactor. The 309 Building (Figure 1.1) is located in the 300 Area on the Hanford Site in Washington State. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires that Federal agencies assess the potential impacts that their actions may have on the environment. This Environmental Assessment describes the consideration given to environmental impacts during reactor concept and test site selection, examines the environmental effects of the DOE proposal to ground test the nuclear subsystem, describes alternatives to the proposed action, and examines radiological risks of potential SP-100 use in space. 73 refs., 19 figs., 7 tabs.

Not Available

1988-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

378

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

in to service. NE-ID-BEA-TSD- 2013-0001 July 16, 2013: BEA discovered that a proper lockouttagout had not been installed for work being performed on the Advanced Test Reactor....

379

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Complex (INTEC) to remove sodium from RH-TRU waste The method of separating mixtures with heat will isolate about 100 pounds of ignitable, reactive metal sodium from metal and...

380

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Carlsbad, New Mexico. The waste was generated during nuclear weapons production at the Rocky Flats Plant near Denver, Colorado, and was buried in Idaho from 1954 to 1970. In...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

DOE-STD-1041-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and Operating Practices," Chapter II of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. "Shift Routines and Operating...

382

News & Updates - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

the Workplace NEW - DOE O 452.2E, Nuclear Explosive Safety NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations NEW - DOE P 481.1, DOE's Policy Regarding Laboratories, Plants and...

383

EIS-0089: PUREX Plant and Uranium Oxide Plant Facilities, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy developed this statement to evaluate the environmental impacts of resumption of operations of the PUREX/Uranium Oxide facilities at the Hanford Site to produce plutonium and other special nuclear materials for national defense needs.

384

DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County December 20, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Salony, DOE 509-376-0402, Cameron.Salony@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a contract to the Benton County Sheriff's Office in Kennewick, Wash., to provide law enforcement services at the DOE Hanford Site. The contract has a five-year period of performance, consisting of a one-year base period, with four one-year option periods and an approximate total value of $5 million. As the law enforcement contractor, the sheriff's office will: Ensure site employees obey traffic laws Investigate suspected or reported violations of law Apprehend and arrest those suspected of committing violations of law

385

DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County DOE Awards Hanford Site Law Enforcement Contract to Benton County December 20, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Salony, DOE 509-376-0402, Cameron.Salony@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a contract to the Benton County Sheriff's Office in Kennewick, Wash., to provide law enforcement services at the DOE Hanford Site. The contract has a five-year period of performance, consisting of a one-year base period, with four one-year option periods and an approximate total value of $5 million. As the law enforcement contractor, the sheriff's office will: Ensure site employees obey traffic laws Investigate suspected or reported violations of law Apprehend and arrest those suspected of committing violations of law

386

Operations Security Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish policies, responsibilities and authorities for implementing and sustaining the Department of Energy (DOE) Operations Security (OPSEC) Program. Cancels DOE O 5632.3B. Canceled by DOE O 471.2 of 9-28-1995.

1992-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

387

300 Area steam plant replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington: Environmental assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Steam to support process operations and facility heating is currently produced by a centralized oil-fired plant located in the 300 Area and piped to approximately 26 facilities in the 300 Area. This plant was constructed during the 1940s and, because of tis age, is not efficient, requires a relatively large operating and maintenance staff, and is not reliable. The US Department of Energy is proposing an energy conservation measure for a number of buildings in the 300 Area of the Hanford Site. This action includes replacing the centralized heating system with heating units for individual buildings or groups of buildings, constructing new natural gas pipelines to provide a fuel source for many of these units and constructing a central control building to operate and maintain the system. A new steel-sided building would be constructed in the 300 Area in a previously disturbed area at least 400 m (one-quarter mile) from the Columbia River, or an existing 300 Area building would be modified and used. This Environmental Assessment evaluates alternatives to the proposed actions. Alternatives considered are: (1) the no action alternative; (2) use of alternative fuels, such as low-sulfur diesel oil; (3) construction of a new central steam plant, piping and ancillary systems; (4) upgrade of the existing central steam plant and ancillary systems; and (5) alternative routing of the gas distribution pipeline that is a part of the proposed action. A biological survey and culture resource review and survey were also conducted.

NONE

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

Microsoft Word - MemoToMr. Gottlieb_DOE_, 20090323.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

X X L L XL Sci-Tech, Inc. 3100 George Washington Way Richland, WA 99354 Science & Technology e-mail: BenPeng@XLSciTech.COM MemoToMr. Gottlieb(DOE), 20090323.doc CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 of 2 Memo From: Ben Peng 3100 George Washington Way eFax: 415-962-0426 Richland, WA 99354 BenPeng@XLSciTech.COM To: Mr. Paul A. Gottlieb Telephone: (202) 586-3439 Office of the Assistant General Counsel for GC-62@hq.doe.gov Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue S.W. Washington, DC 20585 ATTN: TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER QUESTIONS Subject: RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF INQUIRY; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PRACTICES AT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LABORATORIES (73 FR 72036) Date: March. 23, 2009 Dear Mr. Gottlieb: Thank you for the opportunity for XL Sci-Tech as a small business concern to respond to the

389

Advanced Materials for Reversible Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (RSOFC), Dual-Mode Operation with Low Degradation - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Eric Tang, Tony Wood, Sofiane Benhaddad, Casey Brown, Hongpeng He, Jeff Nelson, Oliver Grande, Ben Nuttall, Mark Richard, Randy Petri (Primary Contact) Versa Power Systems 10720 Bradford Road #110 Littleton, CO 80127 Phone: (303) 226-0762 Email: randy.petri@versa-power.com DOE Managers HQ: Kathi Epping Martin Phone: (202) 586-7425 Email: Kathi.Epping@ee.doe.gov

390

EIS-0212: Safe Interim Storage of Hanford Tank Wastes, Hanford Site, Richland, WA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This environmental impact statement asseses Department of Energy and Washington State Department of Ecology maintanence of safe storage of high-level radioactive wastes currently stored in the older single-shell tanks, the Watchlist Tank 101-SY, and future waste volumes associated with tank farm and other Hanford facility operations, including a need to provide a modern safe, reliable, and regulatory-compliant replacement cross-site transfer capability. The purpose of this action is to prevent uncontrolled releases to the environment by maintaining safe storage of high-level tank wastes.

391

Measurement of Fukushima Aerosol Debris in Sequim and Richland, WA and Ketchikan, AK  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Aerosol collections were initiated at several locations by PNNL shortly after the Great East Japan Earthquake of May 2011. Aerosol samples were transferred to laboratory high-resolution gamma spectrometers for analysis. Similar to treaty monitoring stations operating across the Northern hemisphere, iodine and other isotopes which could be volatilized at high temperature were detected. Though these locations are not far apart, they have significant variations with respect to water, mountain-range placement, and local topography. Variation in computed source terms will be shown to bound the variability of this approach to source estimation.

Miley, Harry S.; Bowyer, Ted W.; Engelmann, Mark D.; Eslinger, Paul W.; Friese, Judah I.; Greenwood, Lawrence R.; Haas, Derek A.; Hayes, James C.; Keillor, Martin E.; Kiddy, Robert A.; Kirkham, Randy R.; Landen, Jonathan W.; Lepel, Elwood A.; Lidey, Lance S.; Litke, Kevin E.; Morris, Scott J.; Olsen, Khris B.; Thompson, Robert C.; Valenzuela, Blandina R.; Woods, Vincent T.; Biegalski, Steven R.

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

392

Environmental assessment for the relocation and storage of isotopic heat sources, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of a bilateral agreement between the Federal Minister for Research and Technology of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) and the DOE, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) developed processes for the treatment and immobilization of high-level radioactive waste. One element of this bilateral agreement was the production of sealed isotopic heat sources. During the mid-1980s, 30 sealed isotopic heat sources were manufactured. The sources contain a total of approximately 8.3 million curies consisting predominantly of cesium-137 and strontium-90 with trace amounts of transuranic contamination. Currently, the sources are stored in A-Cell of the 324 Building. Intense radiation fields from the sources are causing the cell windows and equipment to deteriorate. Originally, it was not intended to store the isotopic heat sources for this length of time in A-cell. The 34 isotopic heat sources are classified as remote handled transuranic wastes. Thirty-one of the isotopic heat sources are sealed, and seals on the three remaining isotopic heat sources have not been verified. However, a decision has been made to place the remaining three isotopic heat sources in the CASTOR cask(s). The Washington State Department of Health (WDOH) has concurred that isotopic heat sources with verified seals or those placed into CASTOR cask(s) can be considered sealed (no potential to emit radioactive air emissions) and are exempt from WAC Chapter 246-247, Radiation Protection-Air Emissions.

NONE

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

Safe interim storage of Hanford tank wastes, draft environmental impact statement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Draft EIS is prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). DOE and Ecology have identified the need to resolve near-term tank safety issues associated with Watchlist tanks as identified pursuant to Public Law (P.L.) 101-510, Section 3137, ``Safety Measures for Waste Tanks at Hanford Nuclear Reservation,`` of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991, while continuing to provide safe storage for other Hanford wastes. This would be an interim action pending other actions that could be taken to convert waste to a more stable form based on decisions resulting from the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) EIS. The purpose for this action is to resolve safety issues concerning the generation of unacceptable levels of hydrogen in two Watchlist tanks, 101-SY and 103-SY. Retrieving waste in dilute form from Tanks 101-SY and 103-SY, hydrogen-generating Watchlist double shell tanks (DSTs) in the 200 West Area, and storage in new tanks is the preferred alternative for resolution of the hydrogen safety issues.

Not Available

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

394

Implementation Guide - Aviation Management, Operations, Maintenance, Security, and Safety for Use with DOE O 440.2B Chg 1, Aviation Management and Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides detailed information to help all personnel, responsible for a part of the aviation program, understand and comply with the rules and regulations applicable to their assignments. Cancels DOE G 440.2B-2. Canceled by DOE N 251.110.

2008-10-17T23:59:59.000Z

395

DOE Announces Transfer of Depleted Uranium to Advance the U.S. National Security Interests, Extend Operations at Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Transfer to deliver important national security benefits, while keeping Kentucky plant operating for the next year

396

Secretary Moniz Meets with Employees, Tribal Leaders during Hanford...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Special Assistant to the Secretary T.J. Augustine, Secretary Ernest Moniz, EM Senior Advisor Dave Huizenga and DOE Richland Operations Office Deputy Manager Doug Shoop. Energy...

397

Health Safety and Environmental Protection Committee Page 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

has worked and what hasn't from safety representatives. Ed Parsons, Senior Technical Advisor to DOE-Richland Operations (RL) Environmental Health and Safety introduced himself by...

398

Additional Information on the ERDF PA approach  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of Energy Richland Operations Office River Corridor Closure Project DOE's Largest Environmental Cleanup Closure Project October 7, 2014 RIVER CORRIDOR CLOSURE PROJECT Protecting...

399

Department of Energy Small Business Conference Starts Today in...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Solutions, LLC (Richland, WA) Management & Operations Small Business Special Recognition: Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (Princeton, NJ) DOE Mentor of the Year: IBM...

400

Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HSW HSW EIS January 2004 1.6 Figure 1.2. States with Radioactive Waste Disposal Activities Final HSW EIS January 2004 1.12 Figure 1.3. Relationship of the HSW EIS to Other Hanford Cleanup Operations, Material Management Activities, and Key Environmental Reviews 2.17 Final HSW EIS January 2004 Figure 2.6. Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Figure 2.7. X-Ray Image of Transuranic Waste Drum Contents M0212-0286.11 HSW EIS 12-10-02 M0212-0286.12 HSW EIS 12-10-02 2.17 Final HSW EIS January 2004 Figure 2.6. Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Figure 2.7. X-Ray Image of Transuranic Waste Drum Contents M0212-0286.11 HSW EIS 12-10-02 M0212-0286.12 HSW EIS 12-10-02 Final HSW EIS January 2004 2.34 Figure 2.18. Typical Liner System Final HSW EIS January 2004 2.36

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu June 12, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Geoff Tyree Geoffrey.Tyree@rl.doe.gov 509-376-4171 Who: Secretary of Energy Steven Chu What: Speech to employees, followed by 15-minute media availability When: Friday, June 15, 2012, from 9:30 to 11:00 a.m. Where: Howard Amon Park, Richland, Wash. (park no later than 9:30, assemble near the "Fingernail" stage, right side, look for mult-box) Why: To shoot photos and video of the Energy Secretary speaking to Hanford Site employees and ask the Secretary questions during a media availability following his meeting with employees Audio/Video: Video of the Energy Secretary and Hanford Site employees

402

DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

information, use the DOE Phonebook. Latest content created by this user Jan 05, 2015 Conduct of Operations Dec 04, 2014 Certification for DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 1 Jun 29, 2010...

403

WR-B-01-01.PDF  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 AUDIT REPORT RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE FLEET MANAGEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES JANUARY 2001 February 2, 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGERS, RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE AND OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION FROM: Lawrence R. Ackerly, Regional Manager (Signed) Western Regional Audit Office Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Richland Operations Office Fleet Management" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office and the Office of River Protection (together referred to as "Richland") and the Hanford Site's (Site) prime contractors had a fleet of 1,332 light and heavy motor vehicles as

404

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

www.inl.gov Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S....

405

OPERATIONS (OPS)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OPS) OPS) OBJECTIVE OPS.1 The formality and discipline of operations is adequate to conduct work safely and programs are in place to maintain this formality and discipline. (CR 13) Scope: The Conduct of Operations Program was evaluated during the recent KE Basin FTS ORR and was found to be adequately implemented. Based on this result and the subsequent program enhancements, the scope of the review is to be limited to the SWS operating and maintenance evolutions. Criteria * Programmatic elements of conduct of operations are in place for SWS operations. (DOE Order 5480.19) * The SWS operations personnel adequately demonstrate the principles of conduct of operations requirements during the shift performance period. (DOE Order 5480.19)

406

DOE Explosives Safety Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Manual describes the Departments explosive safety requirements applicable to operations involving the development, testing, handling, and processing of explosives or assemblies containing explosives. Cancels DOE M 440.1-1. Canceled by DOE O 440.1B Chg 1.

2006-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

407

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

54 54 Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Draft November 2013 DOE/EA-1954 Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Draft November 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE Idaho Operations Office ii CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................. v

408

Record of Decision for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site (DOE/EIS-0360) (07/20/04)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

49 49 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Notices halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make recommendations to DOE in the areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities. Tentative Agenda 8 a.m.-Introductions, overview of meeting agenda and logistics (Dave Mosby) 8:15 a.m.-Past year evaluation-Board and stakeholder survey results, what worked, what can be improved (Facilitator) 9:50 a.m.-Break 10:05 a.m.-Past year evaluation continued 10:45 a.m.-Summaries and Q&A on the most important issues to DOE, TN Department of Environment & Conservation, and EPA (Facilitator) 11:30 a.m.-Lunch

409

Implementation Guide - Aviation Management, Operations, Maintenance, Security, and Safety for Use with DOE O 440.2B, Aviation Management and Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides detailed information to help all personnel, responsible for a part of the aviation program, understand and comply with the rules and regulations applicable to their assignments. Canceled by DOE G 440.2B-2A.

2003-07-18T23:59:59.000Z

410

EIS-0119-SA-01: Supplement Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington, Richland Operations Office

411

2011-12-0015 DOE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

with Department of Energy (DOE), continues to deploy industry-recognized best practices to improve service delivery and reduce operating costs. Cloud computing is an...

412

DOE Gives Mission Support Alliance Top Safety Award | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Gives Mission Support Alliance Top Safety Award Gives Mission Support Alliance Top Safety Award DOE Gives Mission Support Alliance Top Safety Award January 27, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Cameron Hardy, DOE January 27, 2012 (509) 376-5365, Cameron.Hardy@rl.doe.gov Deanna Smith, MSA (509) 373-0857, Deanna_L_Smith@rl.gov RICHLAND, Wash. - The Department of Energy (DOE) has awarded contractor Mission Support Alliance (MSA) Star Status in the (DOE) Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) for its mission support services. This status is the highest safety honor a contractor can receive through DOE's VPP Program. The star recognizes MSA's mission support services group for excellence in employee safety and health programs. The program promotes safety and health excellence through cooperative efforts among labor, management, and government at the DOE contractor

413

Process Intensification of Hydrogen Unit Operations Using an Electrochemical Device - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Glenn Eisman (Primary Contact), Dylan Share, Chuck Carlstrom H2Pump LLC 11 Northway Lane North Latham, NY 12110 Phone: (518) 783-2241 Email: glenn.eisman@h2pumpllc.com DOE Manager HQ: Richard Farmer Phone: (202) 586-1623 Email: Richard.Farmer@ee.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-SC0002185 Subcontractor: PBI Performance Products, Inc., Rock Hill, SC Project Start Date: Phase II: August 15, 2010 Project End Date: August 15, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop and demonstrate a multi-functional hydrogen production technology based on a polybenzimidazole (PBI) membrane which exhibits: High efficiency (70%) * Up to 100 scfh pumping capability * CO * 2 and CO tolerance

414

DOE Standards Actions, January 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Documents Recently Published Documents Recently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: • DOE-STD-1032-92, Guide to Good Practices for Operations Or- ganization and Administration, December 1992, Change No- tice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1033-92, Guide to Good Practices for Operations and Administration Updates Through Required Reading, December 1992, Change No- tice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1034-93, Guide to Good Practices for Timely Or- ders to Operators, March 1993, Change Notice No. 1, Decem- ber 1998. • DOE-STD-1035-93, Guide to Good Practices for Logkeeping, March 1993, Change Notice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1036-93, Guide to Good Practices for Independent Verification, June 1993, Change Notice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1038-93, Guide to Good Practices for Operations Turn-

415

Supplement Analysis of Environmental Effects of Changes in DOE's Preferred Alternative for Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ll\\k/il:l,lrll?llc)l(F':llrll(F''rl:li of spent Nllhxi3a" III,JE!I fiK1''lrll'I!tlle! ., ,.,.. ,.,P d . . u.. . l'< Il!hls'illlsatthe! Iklr'likx'dl siliE!,, lF!,idllll:lllcll:, "\/'ilklslhllilrllgllhclllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIllllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ,{"gq$ql, ~ &)#l) !Siiilll,,lllll IIIP''IIIP"" 111'(ill!!!'llllrlllrllll'(lll!!!lllr'1111'1111 ,[ll~lllll!lllrllllzllll, lll''~lll~l~'!!sli!s f? Il![!!ldl!l $( 111( Iq,f110 :1 1 ,? II 111 4!, Illlllf.,!i, p "t!?l!~~ggiij /,); /($1 Al 11 g I,!$t "1 'TM . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

416

Record of Decision for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, WA (DOE/EIS-0189), 2/26/97  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

693 693 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 1997 / Notices National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board; Meeting AGENCY: National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board; Education. ACTION: Notice of Meeting. SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a forthcoming meeting of the National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board. This notice also describes the functions of the Board. Notice of this meeting is required under Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This document is intended to notify the public of their opportunity to attend. DATE: March 21, 1997. TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. LOCATION: Room 100, 80 F St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20208-7564. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

417

DOE-STD-1023-95  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Natural Phenomena Hazards Assessment Criteri Replaced by DOE-STD-1020-2012 | Change Notice No. 1 (January 1996) | Reaffirmed with Errata (April 2002) It is the policy of the Department of Energy (DOE) to design, construct, and operate DOE facilities so that workers, the general public, and the environment are protected from the impacts of natural phenomena hazards (NPHs) on DOE facilities.It is the policy of the Department of Energy (DOE) to design, construct, and operate DOE facilities.

418

Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Artifacts Curation and Storage Facility. An Automotive Maintenance Shop and Hanford Fire Station were formerly located in the 400 Area, but have been shut down and...

419

Richland Analytical Building Blocks  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

maintenance of fire protection, emergency services, roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, electrical and other utilities, as well environmental, safety, health, quality and...

420

DOE Under Secretary Kristina Johnson Visits INL  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Under Secretary Kristina Johnson Visits INL Idaho National Laboratory Nuclear Science and Technology Operations Manager Mike Goff discusses operations at the INL Hot Fuel...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

use of nuclear explosives. 2015-01-29T17:37:07Z News Item NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations https:www.directives.doe.govnewsnew-doe-o-422.1-admin-chg-2 The...

422

Fuel Cell Combined Heat and Power Industrial Demonstration - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Kriston P. Brooks (Primary Contact), Siva P. Pilli, Dale A. King Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352 Phone: (509) 372-4343 Email: kriston.brooks@pnnl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Peter Devlin Phone: (202) 586-4905 Email: Peter.Devlin@ee.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-AC05-76RL01830 Subcontractor: ClearEdge Power, Portland, OR Project Start Date: May 2010 Project End Date: September 2012

423

Protection Program Operations  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Order establishes requirements for the management and operation of the Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Protective Forces (FPF), Contractor Protective Forces (CPF), and the Physical Security of property and personnel under the cognizance of DOE.

2014-10-14T23:59:59.000Z

424

Corporate Operating Experience Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program helps to prevent the recurrence of significant adverse events/trends by sharing performance information, lessons learned and good practices across the DOE complex.

425

DOE/EA-1570: Final Environmental Assessment for Construction and Operation of Neutrinos at the Main Injector Off-Axis Electron Neutrino Appearance Experiment at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, and St. Louis County, Minnesota  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

70 70 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Environmental Assessment for Construction and Operation of Neutrinos at the Main Injector Off-Axis Electron Neutrino (ν e ) Appearance Experiment (NOvA) at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, and St. Louis County, Minnesota U.S. Department of Energy, Lead Agency Fermi Site Office Batavia, IL U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cooperating Agency St. Paul District St. Paul, MN June 2008 (DOE/EA-1570) NOvA Environmental Assessment June 2008 ii DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any

426

DOE-STD-1038-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for, Operations Turnover, Chapter XII of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1038-93, Guide to Good...

427

DOE-STD-1034-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for, Timely Orders to Operators, Chapter XV of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1034-93, Guide to Good...

428

DOE-STD-1043-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for, Operator Aid Postings, Chapter XVII of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1043-93 CN-1, Guide to Good...

429

DOE/EIS-0373D; Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Consolidation of Nuclear Operations Related to Production of Radioisotope Power Systems  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

For For additional information or for copies of this Draft EIS, contact: AVAILABILITY OF THE DRAFT CONSOLIDATION EIS Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Timothy A. Frazier, EIS Document Manager NE-50/Germantown Building Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-1290 Telephone: 1-800-919-3706 E-mail: ConsolidationEIS@nuclear.energy.gov This document is available on the Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology's Website (http://consolidationeis.doe.gov) for viewing and downloading. TABLE OF CONTENTS vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet ..................................................................................................................................................................iii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................vii

430

DOE Online  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fermilab's Science Adventures! Fermilab's Science Adventures! DOE Online K-12 Instructional Resources ed.fnal.gov/doe/ The U.S. Department of Energy is committed to helping educate our nation's next generation of scientists. The following resources help teachers integrate the Internet into K-12 classroom instruction. DOE Labs General Instructional Units Online Resources Lesson Plans General References DOE Laboratory and Facility Education Home Pages (www-ed.fnal.gov/doe/doe_labs.html) Direct links for 27 education Websites at DOE national laboratories and facilities. Online Catalog (www-ed.fnal.gov/trc/library) Fermilab's Teacher Resource Center collection of 10,000+ PreK-12 instructional materials in science, mathematics and technology. Materials include tradebooks, curriculum materials, educational

431

Systems Engineering of Chemical Hydride, Pressure Vessel, and Balance of Plant for Onboard Hydrogen Storage - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

34 34 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Jamie D. Holladay (Primary Contact), Kriston P. Brooks, Ewa C.E. Rönnebro, Kevin L. Simmons and Mark R. Weimar. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Blvd Richland, WA 99352 Phone: (509) 371-6692 Email: Jamie.Holladay@pnnl.gov DOE Managers HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov GO: Jesse Adams Phone: (720) 356-1421 Email: Jesse.Adams@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-AC05-76RL01830

432

DOE-STD-1030-96 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

for, Lockouts and Tagouts, Chapter IX of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities DOE-STD-1030-95, DOE Standard Guide...

433

DOE Technical Standards Program: Online Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Online Approved DOE Technical Standards Online Approved DOE Technical Standards No. 1001 – 2000 No. 3001 – 4000 No. 4001 – 5500 No. 5501 – 6000 No. 6001 – 6500 No. 7501 – 7750 Document Number Range 1001 – 2000 Number Title DOE-HDBK-1001-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Instructors (80 pages) PDF (226 KB) DOE-HDBK-1002-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators (70 pages) PDF (311 KB) DOE-HDBK-1003-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Maintenance Personnel (106 pages) PDF (391 KB) DOE-HDBK-1010-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Classical Physics (142 pages) PDF (1120 KB) DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Electrical Science, Volume 1 of 4 (166 pages) PDF (4255 KB)

434

DOE Site List  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Links Links Central Internet Database CID Photo Banner DOE Site List Site Geo Site Code State Operations Office1 DOE Programs Generating Streams at Site DOE Programs Managing Facilities Associated Data2 Acid/Pueblo Canyons ACPC NM Oak Ridge Waste/Media, Facilities Airport Substation CA Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Hill Communication Site CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Substation CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities AL Complex NM Albuquerque DP Facilities Alba Craft ALCL OH Oak Ridge Facilities Albany Research Center AMRC OR Oak Ridge Facilities Alcova Switchyard WY Western Area Power Administration Facilities Aliquippa Forge ALFO PA Oak Ridge Facilities

435

Pacific Northwest Site Office Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 Pacific Northwest Site Office Pictured Right: Pacific Northwest Site Office Staff PNSO Staff Photo 1 of 2 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) is an organization within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science with responsibility to oversee and manage the Management and Operating (M&O) contract for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) External link in Richland, Washington. PNNL is one of ten Office of Science Laboratories and is a multi-program

436

Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (DOE/EIS-0388) (11/29/05)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

90 Federal Register 90 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Nuclear Security Administration Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM AGENCY: Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration. ACTION: Notice of intent. SUMMARY: The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), an agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility (BSL-3 Facility) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in Los Alamos, New Mexico. This EIS is being prepared and considered in accordance

437

DOE/EA-1628: Environmental Assessment for Construction and Operation of a Proposed Lignocellulosic Biorefinery, POET Project LIBERTY, LLC. (September 2008)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and Notice of Wetlands and Notice of Wetlands Involvement Construction and Operation of a Proposed Lignocellulosic Biorefinery, POET Project LIBERTY, LLC. Emmetsburg, Iowa Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy by September 2008 September 2008 i POET Project LIBERTY - Final EA 9-26-08.doc Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................i Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms............................................................................................................iv 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Background......................................................................................................................................

438

DOE PAGES  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

a useful reference. Find out more Do you have questions about DOE PAGESBeta content, procedures, or policies? More information is available at OSTI's Public Access Policy page and...

439

DOE Cites Bechtel National Inc. for Price-Anderson Violations | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 15, 2008 - 3:43pm September 15, 2008 - 3:43pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI) for a nuclear safety violation at DOE's Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. BNI is the contractor responsible for the design and construction of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State. The PNOV cites a violation of 10 C.F.R. Part 708, DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program, that prohibits DOE contractors from retaliating against DOE contractor employees who believe they have disclosed information concerning danger to public health or safety. An alleged retaliation was first reported in 2005 by an employee at the Hanford Site who raised

440

DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu DOE Media Advisory: Media Availability with Energy Secretary Steven Chu June 12, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Geoff Tyree Geoffrey.Tyree@rl.doe.gov 509-376-4171 Who: Secretary of Energy Steven Chu What: Speech to employees, followed by 15-minute media availability When: Friday, June 15, 2012, from 9:30 to 11:00 a.m. Where: Howard Amon Park, Richland, Wash. (park no later than 9:30, assemble near the "Fingernail" stage, right side, look for mult-box) Why: To shoot photos and video of the Energy Secretary speaking to Hanford Site employees and ask the Secretary questions during a media availability following his meeting with employees Audio/Video: Video of the Energy Secretary and Hanford Site employees

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

DOE Cites Bechtel National Incorporated for Price-Anderson Violations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Incorporated for Price-Anderson Incorporated for Price-Anderson Violations DOE Cites Bechtel National Incorporated for Price-Anderson Violations October 4, 2007 - 3:14pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today notified Bechtel National Incorporated (BNI) that it will fine the company $165,000 for violations of the Department's nuclear safety requirements. BNI is the primary design and construction contractor for the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) located at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. The Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) issued today cited a series of violations that occurred during the design and construction of the WTP between October 2001 and February 2006. Violations include failures in quality processes to control design changes, and to ensure vendor-supplied

442

DOE News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

operations will be valuable as we continue to prepare for WTP operations," said Scott Samuelson, Manager for the Office of River Protection. Most recently, Mr. Hamel was the...

443

DOE standard: Radiological control  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed this Standard to assist line managers in meeting their responsibilities for implementing occupational radiological control programs. DOE has established regulatory requirements for occupational radiation protection in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 835 (10 CFR 835), ``Occupational Radiation Protection``. Failure to comply with these requirements may lead to appropriate enforcement actions as authorized under the Price Anderson Act Amendments (PAAA). While this Standard does not establish requirements, it does restate, paraphrase, or cite many (but not all) of the requirements of 10 CFR 835 and related documents (e.g., occupational safety and health, hazardous materials transportation, and environmental protection standards). Because of the wide range of activities undertaken by DOE and the varying requirements affecting these activities, DOE does not believe that it would be practical or useful to identify and reproduce the entire range of health and safety requirements in this Standard and therefore has not done so. In all cases, DOE cautions the user to review any underlying regulatory and contractual requirements and the primary guidance documents in their original context to ensure that the site program is adequate to ensure continuing compliance with the applicable requirements. To assist its operating entities in achieving and maintaining compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835, DOE has established its primary regulatory guidance in the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides. This Standard supplements the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides and serves as a secondary source of guidance for achieving compliance with 10 CFR 835.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

822 822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 DOE/EA-1822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... iii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ vii

445

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

76 76 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 DOE/EA-1776 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... v 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................................................. 2

446

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 DOE/EA-1776 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ iii

447

DOE/ID-Number  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22 22 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 DOE/EA-1822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... iii

448

EA-1488: Draft Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

728D 728D Environmental Assessment Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 Approved for Public Release; Further Disseminat ion Uillimited June 2011 DOE/EA-1728D June 2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 This page intentionally left blank. 7 8 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1728D Draft Environmental Assessment iii June 2011 CONTENTS 1 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 3

449

Estimated airborne release of plutonium from the Exxon Nuclear Mixed Oxide Fuel Plant at Richland, Washington as a result of postulated damage from severe wind and earthquake hazard  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The potential airborne releases of plutonium from postulated damage sustained by the Exxon Nuclear Company's Mixed Oxide Fabrication Plant at Richland, Washington, as a result of various levels of wind and earthquake hazard, are estimated. The releases are based on damage scenarios that range up to 250 mph for wind hazard and in excess of 1.0 g ground acceleration for seismic hazard, which were developed by other specialists. The approaches and factors used to estimate the releases (inventories of dispersible materials at risk, damage levels and ratios, fractional airborne releases of dispersible materials under stress, atmosphere exchange rates, and source term ranges) are discussed. Release estimates range from less than 10/sup -7/ g to greater than 14 g of plutonium over a four-day period.

Mishima, J.; Schwendiman, L.C.; Ayer, J.E.; Owzarski, E.L.

1980-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance for the routine maintenance of DOE Technical Standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 MAINTENANCE OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS

451

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for the routine maintenance of DOE Technical Standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 MAINTENANCE OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS

452

Does one need a 4.5 K screen in cryostats of superconducting accelerator devices operating in superfluid helium? lessons from the LHL  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Superfluid helium is increasingly used as a coolant for superconducting devices in particle accelerators: the lower temperature enhances the performance of superconductors in high-field magnets and reduces BCS losses in RF acceleration cavities, while the excellent transport properties of superfluid helium can be put to work in efficient distributed cooling systems. The thermodynamic penalty of operating at lower temperature however requires careful management of the heat loads, achieved inter alia through proper design and construction of the cryostats. A recurrent question appears to be that of the need and practical feasibility of an additional screen cooled by normal helium at around 4.5 K surrounding the cold mass at about 2 K, in such cryostats equipped with a standard 80 K screen. We introduce the issue in terms of first principles applied to the configuration of the cryostats, discuss technical constraints and economical limitations, and illustrate the argumentation with examples taken from large projects confronted with this issue, i.e. CEBAF, SPL, ESS, LHC, TESLA, European X-FEL, ILC.

Lebrun, Philippe [DG unit, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 (Switzerland); Parma, Vittorio; Tavian, Laurent [TE department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 (Switzerland)

2014-01-29T23:59:59.000Z

453

Lessons from Iowa : development of a 270 megawatt compressed air energy storage project in midwest Independent System Operator : a study for the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Iowa Stored Energy Park was an innovative, 270 Megawatt, $400 million compressed air energy storage (CAES) project proposed for in-service near Des Moines, Iowa, in 2015. After eight years in development the project was terminated because of site geological limitations. However, much was learned in the development process regarding what it takes to do a utility-scale, bulk energy storage facility and coordinate it with regional renewable wind energy resources in an Independent System Operator (ISO) marketplace. Lessons include the costs and long-term economics of a CAES facility compared to conventional natural gas-fired generation alternatives; market, legislative, and contract issues related to enabling energy storage in an ISO market; the importance of due diligence in project management; and community relations and marketing for siting of large energy projects. Although many of the lessons relate to CAES applications in particular, most of the lessons learned are independent of site location or geology, or even the particular energy storage technology involved.

Holst, Kent (Iowa Stored Energy Plant Agency, Traer, IA); Huff, Georgianne; Schulte, Robert H. (Schulte Associates LLC, Northfield, MN); Critelli, Nicholas (Critelli Law Office PC, Des Moines, IA)

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

DOE017-0153  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5525 5525 DOE017-0153 ,-.or/ N"( - ./,'-'S MaryBeth Zimmerman 02/14/2001 11:08AM / -- T ' ,44 L - ( _w _1_'- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .I f . J To: Kenneth Friedman/EE/DOE@DOE, Peggy Podolak/EE/DOE@DOE, Linda Silverman/EE/DOE@DOE, Ed Wall/EE/DOE@DOE, David RodgerslEE/DOE@DOE, Jerry DionlEE/DOE@DOE, Gail McKinley/EE/DOE@DOE. Lawrence MansuetifEE/DOE@DOE cc: John Sullivan/EE/DOE@DOE. Darrell Beschen/EEIDOE@DOE, Michael York/EE/DOE@DOE, Buddy GarlandlEEIDOE@DOE, Nancy Jefferv/EEIDOE@DOE, Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE. Sam Baldwin/EE/DOE@DOE, IEE-ADAS Subject: FW: NEP Draft outline Directions on NEP Assessment paper. Please read all of this very carefully before proceeding: Product Schedule: * Inputs due from sectors to Planning: COB on Thursday (sorry) o Due from EERE to Policy Office: noon on Friday

455

DOE PAGES  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

States Government purposes. (End of Notice) Ref. DEAR970.5227-2 Rights in data-technology transfer DOE-funded authors are free to publish in journals of their choice, including...

456

Synergistically Enhanced Materials and Design Parameters for Reducing the Cost of Hydrogen Storage Tanks - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Kevin L. Simmons (Primary Contact), Kenneth Johnson, and Kyle Alvine Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Blvd Richland, WA 99352 Phone: (509) 375-3651 Email: Kevin.Simmons@pnnl.gov Norman Newhouse (Lincoln Composites, Inc.), Mike Veenstra (Ford Motor Company), Anand V. Rau (TORAY Carbon Fibers America) and Thomas Steinhausler (AOC, L.L.C.) DOE Managers HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov GO: Jesse Adams

457

DOE-HDBK-1139/1-00 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-2006 | CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 (September 2004) Why a DOE Chemical Management Handbook? Chemicals are ubiquitous in DOE's nuclear and non-nuclear operations. Given their...

458

DOE-STD-1031-92 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

direction for, Communications, Chapter IV of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. The practices in this guide should...

459

DOE-STD-1042-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for, "Control Area Activities," Chapter III of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities."Control Area Activities" is an...

460

DOE-STD-1037-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chemistry and Unique Processes, Chapter XIII of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. The practices in this guide should...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

EPA Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Consolidation of Nuclear Operations Related to Production of Radioisotope Related to Production of Radioisotope Power Systems (DOE/EIS-0373D) (07/01/05)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

32 32 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2005 / Notices Severity and Resistance to Control, Amador Ranger District, Eldorado National Forest, Amado County, CA,Wait Period Ends: 08/01/2005, Contact: Patricia Ferrell 530-642- 5146. EIS No. 20050264, Draft EIS, NPS, ID, Minidoka Internment National Monument (Former Minidoka Relocation Center) , General Management Plan, Implementation, Jerome County, ID, Comment Period Ends: 09/19/2005, Contact: Neil King 208-837-4793. EIS No. 20050265, Final EIS, NPS, AZ, Chiricahua National Monument Fire Management Plan (FMP), Implementation, AZ, Wait Period Ends: 08/01/2005, Contact: Alan Whalon 520-824-3560. EIS No. 20050266, Draft EIS, DOE, 00, Proposed Consolidation of Nuclear Operations Related to Production of

462

Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (DOE/EIS-0380) (08/31/06)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 Federal Register 10 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices Coordinator, at the address and phone number listed above. Issued at Washington, DC on August 24, 2006. Carol Matthews, Acting Advisory Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 06-7304 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Nuclear Security Administration Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). ACTION: Notice of comment period extension. SUMMARY: On July 7, 2006, NNSA published a Notice of Availability for the Draft Site-wide Environmental

463

Protection Program Operations  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order establishes requirements for the management and operation of the DOE Federal Protective Forces (FPF), Contractor Protective Forces (CPF), and the Physical Security of property and personnel under the cognizance of DOE. Cancels DOE M 470.4-2A, DOE M 470.4-3A, and DOE M 470.4-8. Appendix C Safeguards and Security Alarm Management and Control Systems, of DOE M 470.4-2A, is retained and incorporated into this Order as Attachment 3, Annex 1.

2011-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

464

The Evolution of LTS at DOE's Hanford Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Hanford's Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) Program has evolved from a small, informal process, with minimal support, to a robust program that provides comprehensive transitions from cleanup contractors to long-term stewardship for post-cleanup requirements specified in the associated cleanup decision documents. The LTS Program has the responsibility for almost 100,000 acres of land, along with over 200 waste sites and will soon have six cocooned reactors. Close to 2,600 documents have been identified and tagged for storage in the LTS document library. The program has successfully completed six consecutive transitions over the last two years in support of the U.S. DOE Richland Operations Office's (DOE-RL) near-term cleanup objectives of significantly reducing the footprint of active cleanup operations for the River Corridor. The program has evolved from one that was initially responsible for defining and measuring Institutional Controls for the Hanford Site, to a comprehensive, post remediation surveillance and maintenance program that begins early in the transition process. In 2013, the first reactor area -- the cocooned 105-F Reactor and its surrounding 1,100 acres, called the F Area was transitioned. In another first, the program is expected to transition the five remaining cocooned reactors into the program through using a Transition and Turnover Package (TTP). As Hanford's LTS Program moves into the next few years, it will continue to build on a collaborative approach. The program has built strong relationships between contractors, regulators, tribes and stakeholders and with the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Legacy Management (LM). The LTS Program has been working with LM since its inception. The transition process utilized LM's Site Transition Framework as one of the initial requirement documents and the Hanford Program continues to collaborate with LM today. One example of this collaboration is the development of the LTS Program's records management system in which, LM has been instrumental. The development of a rigorous data collection and records management systems has been influenced and built off of LMs success, which also ensures compatibility between what Hanford's LTS Program develops and LM. In another example, we are exploring a pilot project to ship records from the Hanford Site directly to LM for long-term storage. This pilot would gain program efficiencies so that records would be handled only once. Rather than storage on-site, then shipment to an interim Federal Records Center in Seattle, records would be shipped directly to LM. The Hanford LTS Program is working to best align programmatic processes, find efficiencies, and to benchmark site transition requirements. Involving the Hanford LTS Program early in the transition process with an integrated contractor and DOE team is helping to ensure that there is time to work through details on the completed remediation of transitioning areas. It also will allow for record documentation and storage for the future, and is an opportunity for the program to mature through the experiences that will be gained by implementing LTS Program activities over time.

Moren, Richard J. [Mission Support Alliance, Richland, WA (United States); Grindstaff, Keith D. [USDOE Richland Operations Office, Richland, WA (United States)

2013-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

465

DOE HANDBOOK  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Handbook on Overseas Assignments Handbook on Overseas Assignments United States Department of Energy Office of Human Capital Management July 2013 2 Introduction This handbook covers all types of Federal employment overseas, including details, both within DOE as well as to other agencies; transfers to approved international organizations; assignments to permanent DOE positions; cost-free experts; and personal services agreements (PSAs). This handbook contains information, guidance, sample service agreements, and related documentation that are to be used to implement the following directives: a. Executive Order 11552, Providing for Details and Transfers of Federal Employees to International Organizations at http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/11552.html;

466

DOE-STD-1020-2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Natural Phenomena Hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of Energy Facilities Replaced by DOE-STD-1020-2012 | Superseding DOE-STD-1020-94 (April 1994) It is the policy of the Department of Energy (DOE) to design, construct, and operate DOE facilities so that workers, the general public, and the environment are protected from the impacts of natural phenomena hazards on DOE facilities.

467

DOE Program/Targets and Workshop Objectives  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation by Nancy Garland to DOE's Fuel Cell Operations at Sub-Freezing Temperatures Workshop held February 1-5, 2005 in Phoenix, Arizona.

468

Personnel Security - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

472.2 Chg 1, Personnel Security by Mark Pekrul Functional areas: Personnel Security, Security, Human Capital The order establishes requirements that will enable DOE to operate a...

469

DOE Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

470

DOE Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

772 772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

471

DOE/EIS-0380  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 FISCAL YEAR 2011 MITIGATION ACTION PLAN ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE 2008 LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APRIL 2012 LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE 3747 West Jemez Road, MS A-316 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 DISCLAIMER: This document was prepared by Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS) in their role as management and operations (M&O) contractor for the Los Alamos National Laboratory, under contract to DOE/NNSA (Contract Number DE-AC52-06NA25396). DOE/NNSA LASO has reviewed this document for content and accuracy. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Officer for DOE/NNSA LASO concurs with this document. LA-UR-11-06159 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

472

Introduction of Afternoon Topics and Expectations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Appreciation and overview remarks by DOE Integrated Safety Management Co-champions Patricia R. Worthington, HSS Director, Office of Health and Safety, HS-10 and Ray J. Corey, Assistant Manager for Safety and Environment, DOE Richland Operations Office.

473

Email Template  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Department of Energy - Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL), provided an update on the remedial river investigation for the 100 BC Area. He said DOE-RL received the first...

474

Hanford Advisory Board Hanford Update  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

August 9, 2012 Burt Hill and Pete Garcia DOE- RL Maintenance Policy * Events at Fukushima challenged the Department of Energy- Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and CH2M...

475

222-S radioactive liquid waste line replacement and 219-S secondary containment upgrade, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to: (1) replace the 222-S Laboratory (222-S) radioactive liquid waste drain lines to the 219-S Waste Handling Facility (219-S); (2) upgrade 219-S by replacing or upgrading the waste storage tanks and providing secondary containment and seismic restraints to the concrete cells which house the tanks; and (3) replace the transfer lines from 219-S to the 241-SY Tank Farm. This environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508), and the DOE Implementing Procedures for NEPA (10 CFR 1021). 222-S is used to perform analytical services on radioactive samples in support of the Tank Waste Remediation System and Hanford Site environmental restoration programs. Activities conducted at 222-S include decontamination of analytical processing and support equipment and disposal of nonarchived radioactive samples. These activities generate low-level liquid mixed waste. The liquid mixed waste is drained through pipelines in the 222-S service tunnels and underground concrete encasements, to two of three tanks in 219-S, where it is accumulated. 219-S is a treatment, storage, and/or disposal (TSD) unit, and is therefore required to meet Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303, Dangerous Waste Regulations, and the associated requirements for secondary containment and leak detection. The service tunnels are periodically inspected by workers and decontaminated as necessary to maintain as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) radiation levels. Although no contamination is reaching the environment from the service tunnels, the risk of worker exposure is present and could increase. 222-S is expected to remain in use for at least the next 30 years to serve the Hanford Site environmental cleanup mission.

NONE

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

DOE-STD-1044-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and Piping Labeling," Chapter XVIII of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1044-93 CN-1, Guide to Good...

477

DOE-STD-1039-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of Equipment and System Status, Chapter VIII of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1039-93, Guide to Good...

478

DOE-STD-1032-92 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Organization and Administration, Chapter I of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1032-92 Change Notice 1,...

479

DOE-STD-1035-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

direction for, Logkeeping, Chapter XI of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1035-93, Guide to Good...

480

DOE Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Operational Management » Freedom of Information Act » Reading Operational Management » Freedom of Information Act » Reading Room » DOE Reports DOE Reports Reading Room / DOE Reports 10 CFR Part 63, YMRP, and Yucca Mountain Repository License Application Cross Reference Matrix. (pdf) Note: Primary Reference Documents Disk 1 and Disk 2 files can be received by contacting the DOE FOIA Office. Phase 1 Decommissioning Plan for the West Valley Demonstration Project Appendix C - Details of DCGL Development and the Intergrated Dose Assessment - Attachment 1. December 5, 2008. (pdf) Phase 1 Decommissioning Plan for the West Valley Demonstration Project (including Appendix C, Attachment 1) December 5, 2008. Note: Files can be received by contacting the DOE FOIA Office. Phase 1 Decommissioning Plan for the West Valley Demonstration Project,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe richland operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

DOE Approved Technical Standards | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Information Center » DOE Technical Standards Program » DOE Information Center » DOE Technical Standards Program » DOE Approved Technical Standards DOE Approved Technical Standards Document ID Filter Document ID sort descending Title Date DOE-HDBK-1001-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Instructors This guide contains good practices for the training and qualification of technical instructors and instructional technologist at DOE reactor and non-reactor nuclear facilities. 05/15/1996 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators The purpose of the Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators is to provide contractor training organizations with information that can be used as a reference to refine existing chemical operator training programs, or develop new training programs where no program exists. 05/14/1996

482

Preparing for Implementation of DOE O 435.1 at Hanford  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Implementation of a new DOE Order at a complex site like Hanford is not as simple as just stating that the Order is to be followed. There are contractual changes, interface adjustments and institutional obstacles to overcome that all must be properly analyzed and dealt with before the actual physical changes embodied in the new requirements can be put into practice. In planning for these changes associated with the new DOE 0 435.1 ''Radioactive Waste Management'', the Richland Operations Office (RL) of the U.S. Department of Energy is attempting to make an orderly and efficient transition to the new Order requirements. In so doing, RL is tasking the Management and Integration contractor for the Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) held by Fluor Daniel Hanford (FDH) to coordinate the planning and integration efforts necessary to ensure that resources needed to implement the new requirements are identified and plans for implementation completed within the first year after issuance of the Order. Implementation at Hanford is complicated not only by the relatively complex contract situation with the PHMC under FDH and its major subcontractors, the Environmental Remediation Contract (under Bechtel), and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (run by Battelle), but also by the newly created Office of River Protection (ORP) which reports directly to EM-1, and not to the Hanford site RL Manager. Despite the obstacles, however, Hanford is making a concerted effort to effectively implement the new requirements, while maximizing use of existing systems, processes and documentation. This paper describes the process and experiences Hanford has developed to accomplish this objective. The interested audience will include others involved in implementation of new DOE Order 435.1 and others interested in the workings of large federal installations such as Hanford. This paper concludes that through use of planning, communications and participation of involved parties, complex new requirements can be appropriately evaluated, analyzed and approaches for their implementation developed and successfully put into place. The approach taken by Hanford to accomplish this mission is set forth in this paper, and lessons learned along the way are described.

FRITZ, D.W.

2000-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

483