Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

DOE Requires Westinghouse to Cease Sales of Two Light Bulb Models and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Requires Westinghouse to Cease Sales of Two Light Bulb Models Requires Westinghouse to Cease Sales of Two Light Bulb Models and Allows Sale of Another DOE Requires Westinghouse to Cease Sales of Two Light Bulb Models and Allows Sale of Another October 18, 2010 - 10:27am Addthis As a part of DOE's continuing enforcement action against Westinghouse Lighting Corporation, the company must cease sales of two light bulb models - medium based CFL basic model 15GLOBE/65/2 (Westinghouse product code 3800400) and general service fluorescent lamp model F40T12/CWE (Westinghouse product code 07521000) - because they do not meet DOE's energy efficiency standards. Based on test data provided by Westinghouse for basic model 15GLOBE/65/2, DOE has issued a Notice of Non-Compliance Determination to Westinghouse Lighting Corporation, requiring Westinghouse to halt sales and notify all

2

DOE Requires Westinghouse to Cease Sales of Two Light Bulb Models and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Requires Westinghouse to Cease Sales of Two Light Bulb Models Requires Westinghouse to Cease Sales of Two Light Bulb Models and Allows Sale of Another DOE Requires Westinghouse to Cease Sales of Two Light Bulb Models and Allows Sale of Another October 18, 2010 - 10:27am Addthis As a part of DOE's continuing enforcement action against Westinghouse Lighting Corporation, the company must cease sales of two light bulb models - medium based CFL basic model 15GLOBE/65/2 (Westinghouse product code 3800400) and general service fluorescent lamp model F40T12/CWE (Westinghouse product code 07521000) - because they do not meet DOE's energy efficiency standards. Based on test data provided by Westinghouse for basic model 15GLOBE/65/2, DOE has issued a Notice of Non-Compliance Determination to Westinghouse Lighting Corporation, requiring Westinghouse to halt sales and notify all

3

DOE Initiates Enforcement Proceedings against Westinghouse and Mitsubishi  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Initiates Enforcement Proceedings against Westinghouse and Initiates Enforcement Proceedings against Westinghouse and Mitsubishi for Failure to Certify (Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty Issued) DOE Initiates Enforcement Proceedings against Westinghouse and Mitsubishi for Failure to Certify (Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty Issued) April 21, 2010 - 10:42am Addthis The Office of General Counsel has issued Notices of Proposed Civil Penalty to Westinghouse Lighting Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. for failing to certify that certain of their products meet the applicable energy conservation standards as required by the Energy Policy Conservation Act (EPCA) and DOE regulations. The Notice issued to Westinghouse proposes payments to the government of $350,400 for failure to certify over 71 types of light bulbs. The Notice issued to Mitsubishi

4

DOE Initiates Enforcement Proceedings against Westinghouse and...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Civil Penalty to Westinghouse Lighting Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. for failing to certify that certain of their products meet the applicable energy...

5

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Westinghouse Atomic Power Development  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Atomic Power Atomic Power Development Plant - PA 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: WESTINGHOUSE ATOMIC POWER DEVELOPMENT PLANT (PA.04 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: East Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania PA.04-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 PA.04-2 Site Operations: Research and development on uranium oxide fuel elements in the 1940s. PA.04-3 PA.04-5 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Radiation levels below criteria PA.04-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium, Zirconium PA.04-3 PA.04-4 Radiological Survey(s): Yes PA.04-1 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP PA.04-5 Also see Documents Related to WESTINGHOUSE ATOMIC POWER DEVELOPMENT PLANT

6

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Westinghouse Advanced Reactors Div  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Advanced Reactors Div Advanced Reactors Div Plutonium and Advanced Fuel Labs - PA 10 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: WESTINGHOUSE ADVANCED REACTORS DIV., PLUTONIUM FUEL LABORATORIES, AND THE ADVANCED FUEL LAB (PA.10 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Cheswick , Pennsylvania PA.10-1 Evaluation Year: Circa 1987 PA.10-1 PA.10-4 Site Operations: 1960s and 1970s - Produced light water and fast breeder reactor fuels on a development and pilot plant scale. Closed in 1979. PA.10-2 PA.10-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Decommissioned and decontaminated under another Federal program. Release condition confirmed by radiological surveys. PA.10-1 PA.10-2 PA.10-3 PA.10-4 PA.10-5 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes

7

Microsoft Word - DOE-ID-14-089 Westinghouse EC B3-6.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 SECTION A. Project Title: Development of Thermo-Acoustic Sensors for Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors - Westinghouse Electric Company LLC SECTION B. Project Description Westinghouse...

8

Westinghouse Hanford Company Conduct of Operations Manual: GOCO Cross-Cultivation Committee, Operational Excellence Task Force  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This manual has been prepared to establish guidelines that are to be used at all Westinghouse Government Operations Business Unit (GOBU) sites and Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC). The purpose of the manual is to establish standards that comply with the requirements of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities'' and that will be used at all Westinghouse Government Operations Business Unit sites and Westinghouse Savannah River Company.

Schilperoort, D.

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

Westinghouse Hanford Company Conduct of Operations Manual: GOCO Cross-Cultivation Committee, Operational Excellence Task Force  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This manual has been prepared to establish guidelines that are to be used at all Westinghouse Government Operations Business Unit (GOBU) sites and Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC). The purpose of the manual is to establish standards that comply with the requirements of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, ``Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities`` and that will be used at all Westinghouse Government Operations Business Unit sites and Westinghouse Savannah River Company.

Schilperoort, D.

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Westinghouse and Fuzhou Permitted to Restart Distribution of Light Bulb  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Westinghouse and Fuzhou Permitted to Restart Distribution of Light Westinghouse and Fuzhou Permitted to Restart Distribution of Light Bulb Products Westinghouse and Fuzhou Permitted to Restart Distribution of Light Bulb Products August 6, 2010 - 4:26pm Addthis The Department has issued Notices of Allowance to Westinghouse Lighting Corporation and Fuzhou Sunlight Lighting Electrical Appliance Company determining, based on corrected test data provided by Westinghouse, that the incandescent reflector lamps listed below are compliant with the federal energy conservation standard and may be sold in the United States. These 11 Westinghouse brand lamps, usually used in recessed light fixtures, correspond to 7 basic models, which are manufactured in China by Fuzhou. DOE had previously issued Notices requiring Fuzhou and Westinghouse to

11

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - EA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - EA 98-09 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - EA 98-09 September 21, 1998 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company, related to Bioassay Program Deficiencies at the Savannah River Site, (EA-98-09) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of the facts and circumstances concerning deficiencies in Westinghouse Savannah River Company's (WSRC) bioassay participation requirements and WSRC's corrective actions to remedy those deficiencies. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - EA 98-09 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company -

12

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hanford Corporation - September Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 September 22, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Operational Safety Requirements Implementation at the B Plant/Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility at the Hanford Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Hanford B Plant/Waste Encapsulation Facility (WESF). These potential noncompliances were identified by WHC on May 8, 1995, during a self-initiated comprehensive assessment of the facilities Operational Safety Requirements (OSR) program

13

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Westinghouse Atomic Power Div - PA 16  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Power Div - PA Power Div - PA 16 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: WESTINGHOUSE ATOMIC POWER DIV. (PA.16 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Route 30 (Forrest Hills) , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania PA.16-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 PA.16-1 Site Operations: Processed uranium metal for research and development and pilot-scale production of uranium oxide fuel elements. Prepared uranium metal for Enrico Fermi's Stagg Field experiment. PA.16-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Radiation levels below criteria PA.16-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium PA.16-1 Radiological Survey(s): Yes PA.16-3 Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP

14

Technical review of Westinghouse`s Advanced Turbine Systems Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

US DOE`s ATS program has the goals of increased efficiency of natural gas-fired power generation plants, decreased cost of electricity, and a decrease in harmful emissions. The Westinghouse ATS plant is based on an advanced gas turbine design combined with an advanced steam turbine and a high efficiency generator. Objectives of the ATS Program Phase 2 are to select the ATS cycle and to develop technologies required to achieve ATS Program goals: combustion, cooling, aerodynamics, leakage control, coatings, materials. This paper describes progress on each.

Diakunchak, I.S.; Bannister, R.L.

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

15

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waste Isolation Division - October Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 October 3, 2000 Issued to Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division related to Quality Assurance and Occupational Radiation Protection Noncompliances at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of four noncompliances with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Rule (10 CFR 830.120) and/or the Occupational Radiation Protection Rule (10 CFR 835) at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - July 21, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997

16

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waste Isolation Division - October Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 October 3, 2000 Issued to Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division related to Quality Assurance and Occupational Radiation Protection Noncompliances at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of four noncompliances with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Rule (10 CFR 830.120) and/or the Occupational Radiation Protection Rule (10 CFR 835) at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - July 21, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997

17

Westinghouse Savannah River Company: Report from the DOE Voluntary Protection Program onsite reviews, February 24--March 7, 1997, and June 15--19, 1998  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the Department of Energy Voluntary Protection Program (DOE-VPP) Initial and Update Review Teams` findings from the onsite evaluations of the Westinghouse Savannah River Site (SRS), conducted February 24--March 7, 1997, and June 15-19, 1998. The site was evaluated against the program requirements contained in US Department of Energy Voluntary Protection Program, Part 1: Program Elements to determine its success in implementing the five tenets of DOE-VPP. The Initial Review Team concluded that WSRC met or surpassed all DOE-VPP requirements, with the exception of 12 minor findings and 5 recommendations. WSRC was asked to resolve the findings within 90 days. During a follow-up visit in January 1996, representatives of the Team verified that all 90-day actions were completed. The Update Team detected though that the program did not demonstrate thorough and meaningful employee involvement. The ability to attain and sustain VPP-level performance on employee involvement is a significant challenge. Large companies with multiple layers of management and geographically disperse personnel have particular difficulty.

NONE

1999-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

18

Westinghouse Lighting: Noncompliance Determination (2010-CE-09/1001) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Westinghouse Lighting: Noncompliance Determination Westinghouse Lighting: Noncompliance Determination (2010-CE-09/1001) Westinghouse Lighting: Noncompliance Determination (2010-CE-09/1001) June 14, 2010 DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Westinghouse Lighting Corporation finding that various models of incandescent reflector lamps do not comport with the energy conservation standards. DOE determined the products were noncompliant based on the company's own testing. Westinghouse Lighting must immediately notify each person (or company) to whom Westinghouse Lighting distributed the noncompliant products that the products do not meet Federal standards. In addition, Westinghouse Lighting must provide to DOE documents and records showing the number of units Westinghouse Lighting distributed and to whom. The manufacturer

19

Westinghouse Lighting: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-09/1001) | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Westinghouse Lighting: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-09/1001) Westinghouse Lighting: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-09/1001) Westinghouse Lighting: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-09/1001) April 19, 2010 DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Westinghouse Lighting Corporation failed to certify various flourescent and incandescent reflector lamps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. DOE regulations require a manufacturer (which includes importers) to submit reports certifying that its products have been tested and meet the applicable energy conservation standards. This civil penalty notice advises the company of the potential penalties and DOE's administrative process, including the company's right to a hearing. Westinghouse Lighting: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-09/1001) More Documents & Publications

20

DOE Challenge Home, Washington Program Requirements | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

More Documents & Publications DOE Challenge Home, California Program Requirements Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) DOE...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September September 22, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 September 22, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Operational Safety Requirements Implementation at the B Plant/Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility at the Hanford Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Hanford B Plant/Waste Encapsulation Facility (WESF). These potential noncompliances were identified by WHC on May 8, 1995, during a self-initiated comprehensive assessment of the facilities Operational Safety Requirements (OSR) program and reported to DOE on May 24, 1995.

22

DOE Challenge Home, California Program Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE Challenge Home, California Program Requirements, as posted on the U.S. Department of Energy's DOE Challenge Home website.

23

Westinghouse Test Stand Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2014 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved MT-14-12 Westinghouse VERA Test Stand Zero Power Physics Test Simulations for the AP1000 PWR Fausto Franceschini,...

24

Microsoft Word - 1aDOE-ID-12-047 Westinghouse EC B3-6 NRC.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 SECTION A. Project Title: Development of LWR Fuels Enhanced Accident Tolerance - Westinghouse Electric Company LLC SECTION B. Project Description The Westinghouse team, which includes General Atomics, Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Texas A&M University, Edison Welding Institute, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Southern Nuclear Operating Company, will work to develop fuel and cladding concepts with strong potential to replace the currently used Zr + UO2 fuel system with and enhanced accident tolerant fuel. This will be done by investigating a new fuel system comprised of a cladding capable of surviving high temperatures and significantly reducing any in-core reactions with steam and a high density fuel of increased U-235

25

Westinghouse Pays $50,000 Civil Penalty to Resolve Light Bulb Efficiency  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Westinghouse Pays $50,000 Civil Penalty to Resolve Light Bulb Westinghouse Pays $50,000 Civil Penalty to Resolve Light Bulb Efficiency Violations Westinghouse Pays $50,000 Civil Penalty to Resolve Light Bulb Efficiency Violations December 13, 2010 - 2:12pm Addthis The Department of Energy has successfully resolved the enforcement case against Westinghouse Lighting Corporation for failure to certify its light bulbs as compliant with DOE's federal efficiency requirements and for the sale of at least 29,000 general service fluorescent and medium base compact fluorescent lamps that used more energy than permitted by law. This case reflects DOE's renewed commitment to enforce the federal efficiency requirements systematically and fairly to level the competitive playing field and to ensure that American consumers are buying products that

26

Westinghouse conduct of operations manual as a tool  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This presentation discusses the Westinghouse Government-Owned and Contractor-Operated (GOCO) Conduct of Operations Manual and how it compares with US Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19 and with the Price Anderson Safety Guide, 10 CFR 830.310. This presentation will focus on what has been added to the requirements of the DOE order and how these items can be used as tools to create excellence in operation.

Schilperoort, D.L.; Scanlan, P.R.

1992-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

27

DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

information, use the DOE Phonebook. Latest content created by this user Jan 05, 2015 Conduct of Operations Dec 04, 2014 Certification for DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 1 Jun 29, 2010...

28

DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

use of nuclear explosives. 2015-01-29T17:37:07Z News Item NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations https:www.directives.doe.govnewsnew-doe-o-422.1-admin-chg-2 The...

29

DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Phonebook. Latest content created by this user Nov 21, 2014 Nuclear Explosive and Weapon Surety Program (Informational Purposes Only) Aug 05, 2014 Nuclear Explosive and Weapon...

30

DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

information, use the DOE Phonebook. Latest content created by this user Aug 26, 2005 Safeguards and Security Program Planning and Management Jul 26, 2011 Safeguards and Security...

31

Personnel Security - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

472.2 Chg 1, Personnel Security by Mark Pekrul Functional areas: Personnel Security, Security, Human Capital The order establishes requirements that will enable DOE to operate a...

32

Westinghouse Lighting: Noncompliance Determination (2010-CE-09/1001) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Noncompliance Determination Noncompliance Determination (2010-CE-09/1001) Westinghouse Lighting: Noncompliance Determination (2010-CE-09/1001) October 8, 2010 DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Westinghouse Lighting Corporation finding that model F40T12/CWE (Westinghouse product code 07521000), a general service fluorescent lamp, and model 15GLOBE/65/2 (Westinghouse product code 3800400), a medium base compact fluorescent lamp, do not comport with the energy conservation standards. DOE determined the products were noncompliant based on the company's own testing. Westinghouse must immediately notify each person (or company) to whom Westinghouse distributed the noncompliant products that the products do not meet Federal standards. In addition, Westinghouse must provide to

33

Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

"To provide requirements and guidelines for Departmental Elements, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), to use in developing directives, plans, and/or procedures relating to the conduct of operations at DOE facilities. The implementation of these requirements and guidelines should result in improved quality and uniformity of operations. Change 2, 10-23-2001. Canceled by DOE O 422.1.

1990-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

34

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Company - April 15, Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997 April 15, 1997 Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Potential Violations of Quality Assurance and Work Process Requirements at the Savannah River Site On February 11, 1997, the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-10) met with members of your staff and the DOE Savannah River Operations Office (DOE-SR) to review your progress in correcting the noncompliances identified in the subject Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports. A summary of our meeting and assessment of the information provided is enclosed with this letter. Your evaluation of the events and conditions leading to each of the occurrences, reported to EH-10 in the subject NTS reports, has identified

35

DOE Challenge Home, Washington Program Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Challenge Home Washington Program Requirements 9-1-2013 To qualify as a DOE Challenge Home, a home shall meet the minimum requirements specified below, be verified and field-tested in accordance with HERS Standards by an approved verifier, and meet all applicable codes. Builders may meet the requirements of either the Performance Path or the Prescriptive path to qualify a home. 1 Single family detached and attached dwelling units, and dwelling units in multifamily buildings with 3 stories or fewer above-grade 2,3 are eligible for qualification. DOE Challenge Home Prescriptive Path The prescriptive path provides a single set of measures that can be used to construct a DOE Challenge Home labeled home. Modeling is not required, but no tradeoffs are allowed. Follow these steps to use the prescriptive path:

36

DOE Challenge Home, California Program Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Challenge Home California Program Requirements These Program Requirements shall only be used in the State of California. To qualify as a DOE Challenge Home, a home shall meet the minimum requirements specified below, be verified and field-tested in accordance with HERS Standards by an approved verifier, and meet all applicable codes. Builders may meet the requirements of either the Performance Path or the Prescriptive path to qualify a home. 1 Single family detached and attached dwelling units, and dwelling units in multifamily buildings with 3 stories or fewer above-grade 2,3 are eligible for qualification. DOE Challenge Home Prescriptive Path The prescriptive path provides a single set of measures that can be used to construct a DOE Challenge Home labeled

37

News & Updates - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Cancellation of Directives Document Actions NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations by Diane Johnson The objective of this Order is to define the requirements for...

38

DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: MINIMUM CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: MINIMUM CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: MINIMUM CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: CORE COMPETENCY...

39

Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Cross-referenced to DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations. Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Cross-referenced to DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations. This is an open-book evaluation. Complete the questions, and submit your answers (hand-written or electronically) to the Training Center. Someone will check and grade your answers. If you achieve a score of at least 80%, you will receive a completion certificate. Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide Review Questions More Documents & Publications U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals, Self-Study Guide

40

DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS: CA DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS: CA DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS. Key Cyber...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Westinghouse thermal barrier coatings development  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Westinghouse, in conjunction with the Department of Energy and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, has embarked upon a program for the development of advanced thermal barrier coatings for industrial gas turbines. Development of thermal barrier coatings (TBC`s) for industrial gas turbines has relied heavily on the transfer of technology from the aerospace industry. Significant differences in the time/temperature/stress duty cycles exist between these two coating applications. Coating systems which perform well in aerospace applications may not been optimized to meet power generation performance requirements. This program will focus on development of TBC`s to meet the specific needs of power generation applications. The program is directed at developing a state-of-the-art coating system with a minimum coating life of 25,000 hours at service temperatures required to meet increasing operating efficiency goals. Westinghouse has assembled a team of university and industry leaders to accomplish this goal. Westinghouse will coordinate the efforts of all program participants. Chromalloy Turbine Technologies, Inc. and Sermatech International, Inc. will be responsible for bond coat and TBC deposition technology. Praxair Specialty Powders, Inc. will be responsible for the fabrication of all bond coat and ceramic powders for the program. Southwest Research Institute will head the life prediction modelling effort; they will also be involved in coordinating nondestructive evaluation (NDE) efforts. Process modelling will be provided by the University of Arizona.

Goedjen, J.G.; Wagner, G. [Westinghouse Electric Corp., Orlando, FL (United States)

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUEST BY SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORP. FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORP. FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORP. FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN INVENTION RIGHTS UNDER DOE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. DE-FC26-03NT41891; W(A)-04-013, CH-1183 The Petitioner, Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation, (Siemens) was awarded this cooperative agreement for the performance of work entitled, "Catalytic Combustion for Fuel Flexible Turbines." The purpose of the cooperative agreement is to develop and demonstrate a cost effective, fuel flexible (syngas/natural gas) catalytic combustor that will achieve 2 ppm NOx emissions at the gas turbine exit and meet all other engine operational requirements. To meet the goals of High Efficiency Engines and Turbines (HEET), this program will develop an ultra-low-NOx catalytic combustor to burn coal-derived synthesis gas (syngas) and natural gas in existing and

43

POLICY GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM #33 - Requirements for DOE Delegated...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - Requirements for DOE Delegated Examining Procedures POLICY GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM 33 - Requirements for DOE Delegated Examining Procedures The purpose of this guidance is to...

44

DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: MINIMUM CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: MINIMUM CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS: CA Cybersecurity Program Manager (CSPM...

45

Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Cross-referenced to DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations. Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct...

46

Westinghouse thermal barrier coatings development  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Westinghouse, in conjunction with the Department of Energy and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, has embarked upon a program for the development of advanced thermal barrier coatings for industrial gas turbines. Development of thermal barrier coatings (TBC`s) for industrial gas turbines has relied heavily on the transfer of technology from the aerospace industry. Significant differences in the time/temperature/stress duty cycles exist between these two coating applications. Coating systems which perform well in aerospace applications may not been optimized to meet power generation performance requirements. This program will focus on development of TBC`s to meet the specific needs of power generation applications.

Goedjen, J.G.; Wagner, G.

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

47

News & Updates - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

the Workplace NEW - DOE O 452.2E, Nuclear Explosive Safety NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations NEW - DOE P 481.1, DOE's Policy Regarding Laboratories, Plants and...

48

Certification Memos - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Chg 1 Certification for DOE P 456.1 Certification for DOE G 440.1-7A Certification for DOE G 441.1-1C Certification for DOE G 414.1-4 Certification for DOE M 441.1-1 and DOE O...

49

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Westinghouse Savannah River Westinghouse Savannah River Company - EA-97-12 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - EA-97-12 December 5, 1997 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company, related to an Unplanned Radioactive Material Intake at the Savannah River Site, (EA-97-12) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding an unplanned intake of radioactive material [ ] by a worker that resulted in the worker receiving an occupational whole body dose of [a specifed value] Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE). The intake, which exceeds the regulatory limit of 5 rems, was identified in April 1997 during a review of the worker's routine bioassay sample results. Subsequent investigation by the Westinghouse

50

Westinghouse Earns Mine Safety Award for Exceptional Underground Operations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Westinghouse Earns Mine Safety Award Westinghouse Earns Mine Safety Award For Exceptional Underground Operations CARLSBAD, N.M., October 5, 2000 - For the 14 th consecutive year, the Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division (WID) has been recognized for "excellence in underground operations" at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). On September 19, New Mexico State Inspector of Mines Gilbert Miera and the New Mexico Mining Association presented Westinghouse with the "Mine Operator of the Year" award. The presentation took place at the New Mexico Mining Association's annual convention in Farmington. The "Mine Operator of the Year" award recognizes Westinghouse's close attention to safety in a mining environment. WID received the award in the category of "non-producing

51

Justification Memoranda - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirement...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

to Revise DOE G 414.1-1B, Management and Independent Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR, Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated...

52

? Westinghouse Completes its AP1000...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

this Issue... Westinghouse Completes its AP1000 Test Stand VERA-CS Coupled Multi-physics Capability demonstrated in a Full-core Simulation TVA provides Watts Bar...

53

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents Return to Download Page The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index includes: NEPA Guidance and Requirements Documents Issued by Published A Brief Guide - DOE-wide Contracts For NEPA Documentation DOE 2003 A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA - Having Your Voice Heard CEQ 2007 A Resource Handbook on DOE Transportation Risk Assessment DOE 2002 Actions During the NEPA Process - Interim Actions DOE 2003 Administrative Record Guidance DOJ 1991 Aligning the NEPA Process with EMS CEQ 2007 Alternative Actions For Analysis in Site-wide NEPA Reviews DOE 1992 Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance EPA 2012 Analysis of Impacts on Prime and Unique Agricultural Lands and NEPA

54

Westinghouse program overview  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Westinghouse Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Development Program has been making rapid progress towards commercialization. The vision of a cost-competitive, ultra-high efficiency, environmentally friendly SOFC power generation product line for distributed power and cogeneration applications is nearing reality. This vision is centered around Pressurized SOFC/Gas Turbine Combined Cycle power generation systems in the 1-100 MWe power range, which are capable of producing electricity at efficiencies between 60 and 75%, depending on size and specific turbines selected. The fuel cell is air electrode supported.

George, R.

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

55

Westinghouse Lighting: Order (2010-CE-09/1001) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Order (2010-CE-09/1001) Order (2010-CE-09/1001) Westinghouse Lighting: Order (2010-CE-09/1001) December 9, 2010 DOE ordered Westinghouse Lighting Corporation to pay a $50,000 civil penalty after finding Westinghouse Lighting had failed to certify that certain models of general service flourescent and incandescent reflector lamps comply with the applicable energy conservation standards. DOE also found that Westinghouse Lighting had manufactured and distributed noncompliant products in commerce in the U.S. The Order adopted a Compromise Agreement, which reflected settlement terms between DOE and Westinghouse Lighting. Westinghouse Lighting: Order (2010-CE-09/1001) More Documents & Publications DuraLamp USA: Order (2010-CE-0912) Lumiram Electric: Order (2010-CE-1014) Philips: Order (2012-SE-2605

56

NERSC/DOE HEP Requirements Workshop Presentations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Workshop GoalsOverview November 12, 2009 | Author(s): Yukiko Sekine | Workshop Logistics November 12, 2009 | Author(s): Harvey Wasserman | DOE HEP Overview November 12, 2009...

57

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - July 6...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 6, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - July 6, 1995 July 6, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Radiological Work Control...

58

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 22, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 September 22, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Operational...

59

Enforcement of DOE Classified Information Security Requirements Under Title  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of DOE Classified Information Security Requirements of DOE Classified Information Security Requirements Under Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 824 Enforcement of DOE Classified Information Security Requirements Under Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 824 In publishing 10 CFR Part 824, DOE has determined that civil penalties under Part 824 will only be assessed for violations of requirements for the protection of classified information (Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data and National Security Information). The rule does not include civil penalties relating to failure to protect sensitive but unclassified information. IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE More Documents & Publications Safety and Security Enforcement Process Overview Preliminary Notice, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC, SEA-2011-01

60

PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION EAST PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION EAST PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA Work performed by the Health and Safety Research Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 March 1980 OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION for the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY as part of the Formerly Utilized Sites-- Remedial Action Program WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION EAST PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA At the request of the Department of Energy (DOE, then ERDA), a preliminary survey was performed at the Westinghouse Electric Corporation's East Pittsburgh Plant in East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (see Fig. l), on October 22, 1976, to assess the radiological status of those facilities utilized under AEC/MED contract during an early phase of the Manhattan

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

News - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nuclear Explosive and Weapon Surety Program - Read More... NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations - by Diane Johnson - last modified Jan 05, 2015 03:39 PM The...

62

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index is a one-stop solution providing you with DOE's Guidance and Requirements documents combined into one file for easy download and use. The compressed (.zip) file contains all of these documents in their optimized and machine-readable format. The file also contains a "search index" that can be used to search for keywords and phrases in all the documents from one search form, without the need to install a separate program. Please direct any questions, comments, or feedback to: John.Jediny@hq.doe.gov Review the documents included in the Search Index as a List or Table NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index.zip

63

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index is a one-stop solution providing you with DOE's Guidance and Requirements documents combined into one file for easy download and use. The compressed (.zip) file contains all of these documents in their optimized and machine-readable format. The file also contains a "search index" that can be used to search for keywords and phrases in all the documents from one search form, without the need to install a separate program. Please direct any questions, comments, or feedback to: John.Jediny@hq.doe.gov Review the documents included in the Search Index as a List or Table NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index.zip

64

Delegation Procedures - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy's primary means of establishing policies, requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental elements and contractors. Directives Program Management Camille...

65

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Table of Table of Contents DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents Return to Download Page The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index includes: NEPA Guidance and Requirements Documents Issued by Published A Brief Guide - DOE-wide Contracts For NEPA Documentation DOE 2003 A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA - Having Your Voice Heard CEQ 2007 A Resource Handbook on DOE Transportation Risk Assessment DOE 2002 Actions During the NEPA Process - Interim Actions DOE 2003 Administrative Record Guidance DOJ 1991 Aligning the NEPA Process with EMS CEQ 2007 Alternative Actions For Analysis in Site-wide NEPA Reviews DOE 1992 Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance EPA 2012 Analysis of Impacts on Prime and Unique Agricultural Lands and NEPA

66

DOE RFI 2010-11129 NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Titled...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy" DOE RFI 2010-11129 NBP RFI: Communications...

67

What are my DOE reporting requirements? | Scientific and Technical  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

What are my DOE reporting requirements? What are my DOE reporting requirements? Print page Print page Email page Email page DOE reporting requirements for DOE financial assistance recipients are specified as scientific/technical reporting deliverables on the Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist (DOE F 4600.2). Other awardees such as Non-major Site/facility Management Contractors technical reporting requirements are identified in Section J, List of Attachments, of the contract as part of the Performance Work Statement/Statement of Work or as a separate attachment. Each required Scientific/Technical Report deliverable is to be submitted to DOE in electronic format as indicated in the award instrument/contractual agreement. Electronic documents should be submitted in one integrated file that contains all text, tables, diagrams, photographs, schematic, graphs,

68

Westinghouse Earns 15th Consecutive Mine Safety Award  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Earns 15 Earns 15 th Consecutive Mine Safety Award CARLSBAD, N.M., September 26, 2001 - Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) has been recognized for "excellence in underground operations and an outstanding record for safety" at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This is the 15 th consecutive year Westinghouse has received the award in the category of "large, non-producing mine." A non-producing mine is one that does not mine a product for profit. This award recognizes Westinghouse's close attention to safety in a mining environment. WTS is the management and operating contractor for the DOE at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). On September 17, New Mexico State Inspector of Mines Gilbert Miera and New

69

Delegation Procedures - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Accessibility Text size: (Requires JavaScript) Large Normal Small This site uses the Open Source Content Management System Plone and has been designed to be completely accessible...

70

NERSC/DOE ASCR Requirements Workshop Logistics  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Logistics Workshop Logistics Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Advanced Scientific Computing Research January 5-6, 2011 Location The workshop will be held at...

71

NERSC/DOE NP Requirements Workshop Logistics  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hotel Hotel Arrangements Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Nuclear Physics May 26-27, 2011 Location The workshop will be held at Hyatt Regency Bethesda One...

72

Contact Form - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Contact Form by Diane Johnson Directives are the Department of Energy's Primary means of establishing policies, requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental...

73

Personnel Security - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2.2 Admin Chg 1, Personnel Security by Mark Pekrul Functional areas: Administrative Change, Personnel Security, Safety and Security The order establishes requirements that will...

74

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - List of Contents |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

List of List of Contents DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - List of Contents Return to Download Page The NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index includes: A Brief Guide - DOE-wide Contracts For NEPA Documentation [DOE][2003] A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA - Having Your Voice Heard [CEQ][2007] A Resource Handbook on DOE Transportation Risk Assessment [DOE][2002] Actions During the NEPA Process - Interim Actions [DOE][2003] Administrative Record Guidance [DOJ][1991] Aligning the NEPA Process with EMS [CEQ][2007] Alternative Actions For Analysis in Site-wide NEPA Reviews [DOE][1992] Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance [EPA][2012] Analysis of Impacts on Prime and Unique Agricultural Lands and NEPA [CEQ][1980] Analysis of Impacts to Workers in NEPA Documentation [DOE][1988]

75

NERSC/DOE BER Requirements Workshop Presentations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Christopher Kerr | Global Cloud Resolving Model May 7, 2009 | Author(s): David Randall | IO Requirements for a Global Cloud Resolving Model May 7, 2009 | Author(s): Bruce...

76

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - EA-2000-02 March 6, 2000 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company, related to Procurement Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement Deficiencies at the Savannah River Site. This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of quality assurance deficiencies with the procurement of items for use at nuclear facilities under your control. DOE conducted an investigation and issued an Investigation Summary Report on December 21, 1999, detailing its findings. An Enforcement Conference was held with management of the Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) to discuss these matters on January 11, 2000. The Enforcement Conference Summary Report is enclosed.

77

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - July 6, 1995 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 6, 1995 July 6, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - July 6, 1995 July 6, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Radiological Work Control Deficiencies at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility at the Hanford Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) investigation of an event that occurred between February 22-March 7, 1995, at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility (PUREX) at DOE's Hanford site. The event, which involved the cutting of a highly contaminated canyon exhaust air sampling probe as part of waste disposal activities without adequate management controls, resulted in your decision to temporarily curtail waste cutting activities. Based on your investigation of the event,

78

DOE Requires Manufacturer and Labeler to Cease Sale of Incandescent...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Manufacturer and Labeler to Cease Sale of Incandescent Reflector Lamps DOE Requires Manufacturer and Labeler to Cease Sale of Incandescent Reflector Lamps June 24, 2010 - 2:40pm...

79

EXC-12-0011 - In the Matter of Westinghouse Lighting Corporation |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 - In the Matter of Westinghouse Lighting Corporation 1 - In the Matter of Westinghouse Lighting Corporation EXC-12-0011 - In the Matter of Westinghouse Lighting Corporation On September 17, 2012, OHA issued a decision granting an Application for Exception filed by Westinghouse Lighting Corporation (Westinghouse) for relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430, Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards and Test Procedures for General Service Fluorescent Lamps and Incandescent Reflector Lamps (Lighting Efficiency Standards). In its exception request, Westinghouse asserted that it will suffer a serious hardship, gross inequity and an unfair distribution of burdens if required to adhere to the Lighting Efficiency Standards, which became effective July 14, 2012 (2009 Final Rule), with respect to its 700 series T8 General Service Fluorescent Lamps (GSFL).

80

DOE RFI 2010-11129 NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Titled  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

RFI 2010-11129 NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Titled RFI 2010-11129 NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Titled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy" DOE RFI 2010-11129 NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Titled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy" Grid Net, Inc. Comments on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy DOE RFI 2010-11129 NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Titled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy"

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 - Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 Updated 4/9/2012 DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments DOE received comments on the draft DOE Challenge Home specifications and requirements from December 15, 2011 through January 31, 2012. This document summarizes the comments received, DOE's responses, and the resulting policy change, if any. All comments were reviewed. Similar comments were grouped together in the responses. Editorial comments and general observations were considered, but are not listed in the responses below unless they involved a significant clarification to the DOE Challenge Home provisions. DOE is not responsible for any typographical errors or omissions.

82

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

97-12 97-12 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - EA-97-12 December 5, 1997 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company, related to an Unplanned Radioactive Material Intake at the Savannah River Site, (EA-97-12) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding an unplanned intake of radioactive material [ ] by a worker that resulted in the worker receiving an occupational whole body dose of [a specifed value] Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE). The intake, which exceeds the regulatory limit of 5 rems, was identified in April 1997 during a review of the worker's routine bioassay sample results. Subsequent investigation by the Westinghouse

83

Implementation of DOE NPH Requirements at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), a Non-Nuclear DOE Lab  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Implementation of DOE NPH Requirements at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), a Non-Nuclear DOE Lab David Luke, DOE, Thomas Jefferson Site Office Stephen McDuffie, DOE, Office of the Chief of Nuclear Safety

84

DOE Challenge Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) April 17, 2013 Effective for Homes Revised April 17, 2013 Page 1 of 8 Permitted Starting 6/17/2013 To qualify as a DOE Challenge Home, a home shall meet the minimum requirements specified below, be verified and field-tested in accordance with HERS Standards by an approved verifier, and meet all applicable codes. Builders may meet the requirements of either the Performance Path or the Prescriptive path to qualify a home. 1 Single family detached and attached dwelling units, and dwelling units in multifamily buildings with 3 stories or fewer above-grade 2,3 are eligible for qualification. DOE Challenge Home Prescriptive Path The prescriptive path provides a single set of measures that can be used to construct a DOE Challenge Home labeled

85

Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC Earns Small Business Program Award  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

For Immediate Release For Immediate Release Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC Earns Small Business Program Award CARLSBAD, N.M., July 10, 2001 - Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) was recognized recently by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) with the Outstanding HUBZone Business Achievement Award. WTS was selected for the award by DOE's Secretarial Small Business Program "This award is a reflection of our commitment to DOE's Small Business Program to provide opportunities for small business concerns," said John Lee, WTS General Manager. "I am proud of the work our procurement group does in this regard." WTS was selected to receive the HUBZone Business Achievement Award based on the amount of money the company spent and the percentage of purchases it made in

86

CERTIFICATION DOCKET WESTINGHOUSE ATOMIC POWER DEVELOPMENT PLANT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

WESTINGHOUSE ATOMIC POWER DEVELOPMENT PLANT WESTINGHOUSE ATOMIC POWER DEVELOPMENT PLANT EAST PITTSBURGH PLANT FOREST HILLS PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Terminal Waste Disposal and Remedial Action Division of Remedial Action Projects ..-.. --__- _".-.-l--_--l -_._ _- --- ~~~. . ..~ CONTENTS Page - - I NTRODUCTI ON 1 Purpose 1 Docket Contents 1 Exhibit I: Summary of Activities at Westinghouse Atomic Power Development Plant, East Pittsburgh Plant, Forest Hills, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania I-l Exhibit II: Documents Supporting the Certification of Westinghouse Atomic Power Development Plant, East Pittsburgh Plant, Forest Hills, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania iii II-1 . . .- .__.^ I ^_... _.-__^-____-. - CERTIFICATION DOCKET WESTINGHOUSE ATOMIC POWER DEVELOPMENT PLANT

87

DOE-STD-1077-94; DOE Standard Training Accreditation Program Standard: Requirements and Guidelines  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7-94 7-94 August 1994 Supercedes DOE-STD-0101T, TAP-1, and DOE-STD-0103T, TAP-3 DOE STANDARD TRAINING ACCREDITATION PROGRAM STANDARD: REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 FSC 6910 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94018723 DOE-STD-1077-94 FOREWORD The Training Accreditation Program was established by the Department of Energy

88

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 426.2 Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6.2 6.2 PERSONNEL SELECTION, TRAINING, QUALIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES DOE O 426.2 Familiar Level June 2011 1 DOE O 426.2 PERSONNEL SELECTION, TRAINING, QUALIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FAMILIAR LEVEL ___________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able answer the following questions: 1. What is the purpose of DOE O 426.2, Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities? 2. What are the DOE field elements requirements associated with DOE O 426.2? 3. What are the general contractor requirements specified in the contractor requirements

89

REQUEST BY SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RIGHTS IN  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RIGHTS IN SUBJECT INVENTIONS MADE IN THE COURSE OF OR UNDER LOCKHEED MARTIN SUBCONTRACT NO. 4500004925 UNDER DOE CONTRACT NO. DE-AC05-960R22464; AND FOR CERTAIN LARGE BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTS THEREUNDER; DOE WAIVER DOCKET W(A)99-011 [ORO-744] Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation (Siemens Westinghouse) has made a timely request for an advance waiver to worldwide rights in Subject Inventions conceived or made in the course of or under Lockheed Martin Energy Research Subcontract No. 4500004925 under DOE Contract No. DE-AC05-960R22464 and under certain subcontracts entered thereunder with parties who do not qualify for treatment under Public Law 96-517. The primary program goal of this work, entitled,

90

Westinghouse TRU Solutions Launches New Web Site  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

TRU Solutions LLC Launches New Web Site TRU Solutions LLC Launches New Web Site CARLSBAD, N.M., February 2, 2001 - Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) today launched its new Web site. WTS is the new management and operating contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The Web site, www.trusolutionsnm.com, is designed to provide up-to-date information about WTS and establish a mechanism for receiving feedback. "We want to make the transition to the new company as smooth as possible," said Hank Herrera, WTS President and General Manager. "The Web site enables us to effectively communicate the WTS role, objectives, and challenges to employees, clients, elected officials, and other stakeholders." The Web site contains sections about the formation of TRU Solutions, the new

91

Personnel Selection, Qualification, and Training Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish selection, qualification, and training requirements for management and operating (M&O) contractor personnel involved in the operation, maintenance, and technical support of Department of Energy and National Nuclear Security Administration Category A and B reactors and non-reactor nuclear facilities. Canceled by DOE O 426.2

2001-07-12T23:59:59.000Z

92

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Company - July 21, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - March 29, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000...

93

NERSC/DOE BES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - Peter Cummings  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Peter Cummings Peter Cummings Peter Cummings BES Requirements Worksheet 1.1. Project Information - Molecular-Based Simulation of Complex and Nanostructured Fluids Document Prepared By Peter Cummings Project Title Molecular-Based Simulation of Complex and Nanostructured Fluids Principal Investigator Peter Cummings Participating Organizations Vanderbilt University Funding Agencies DOE SC DOE NSA NSF NOAA NIH Other: DOE/EERE 2. Project Summary & Scientific Objectives for the Next 5 Years Please give a brief description of your project - highlighting its computational aspect - and outline its scientific objectives for the next 3-5 years. Please list one or two specific goals you hope to reach in 5 years. We perform primarily molecular dynamics simulations of nanostructured

94

DOE-STD-6002-96; DOE Standard Safety of Magnetic Fusion Facilities: Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6002-96 6002-96 May 1996 DOE STANDARD SAFETY OF MAGNETIC FUSION FACILITIES: REQUIREMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009495 DOE-STD-6002-96 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD....................................................................................................................... v

95

Westinghouse Cementation Facility of Solid Waste Treatment System - 13503  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During NPP operation, several waste streams are generated, caused by different technical and physical processes. Besides others, liquid waste represents one of the major types of waste. Depending on national regulation for storage and disposal of radioactive waste, solidification can be one specific requirement. To accommodate the global request for waste treatment systems Westinghouse developed several specific treatment processes for the different types of waste. In the period of 2006 to 2008 Westinghouse awarded several contracts for the design and delivery of waste treatment systems related to the latest CPR-1000 nuclear power plants. One of these contracts contains the delivery of four Cementation Facilities for waste treatment, s.c. 'Follow on Cementations' dedicated to three locations, HongYanHe, NingDe and YangJiang, of new CPR-1000 nuclear power stations in the People's Republic of China. Previously, Westinghouse delivered a similar cementation facility to the CPR-1000 plant LingAo II, in Daya Bay, PR China. This plant already passed the hot functioning tests successfully in June 2012 and is now ready and released for regular operation. The 'Follow on plants' are designed to package three 'typical' kind of radioactive waste: evaporator concentrates, spent resins and filter cartridges. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview on the Westinghouse experience to design and execution of cementation facilities. (authors)

Jacobs, Torsten; Aign, Joerg [Westinghouse Electric Germany GmbH, Global Waste Management, Tarpenring 6, D- 22419 Hamburg (Germany)] [Westinghouse Electric Germany GmbH, Global Waste Management, Tarpenring 6, D- 22419 Hamburg (Germany)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

96

NERSC/DOE FES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - Stephane Ethier  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Stephane Ethier Stephane Ethier Stephane Ethier FES Requirements Worksheet 1.1. Project Information - Global Gyrokinetic PIC Simulations of Plasma Microturbulence Document Prepared By Stephane Ethier Project Title Global Gyrokinetic PIC Simulations of Plasma Microturbulence Principal Investigator Weixing Wang Participating Organizations PPPL Funding Agencies DOE SC DOE NSA NSF NOAA NIH Other: 2. Project Summary & Scientific Objectives for the Next 5 Years Please give a brief description of your project - highlighting its computational aspect - and outline its scientific objectives for the next 3-5 years. Please list one or two specific goals you hope to reach in 5 years. We use global, gyrokinetic particle-in-cell simulations to study all aspects of plasma micro-turbulence in the core of tokamak fusion devices.

97

NERSC/DOE FES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - Frank Tsung  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Frank Tsung Frank Tsung Frank Tsung FES Requirements Worksheet 1.1. Project Information - Large Scale Particle-in-Cell Simulations of Laser Plasma Interactions Relevant to Inertial Fusion En Document Prepared By Frank Tsung Project Title Large Scale Particle-in-Cell Simulations of Laser Plasma Interactions Relevant to Inertial Fusion En Principal Investigator Frank Tsung Participating Organizations UCLA Funding Agencies DOE SC DOE NSA NSF NOAA NIH Other: 2. Project Summary & Scientific Objectives for the Next 5 Years Please give a brief description of your project - highlighting its computational aspect - and outline its scientific objectives for the next 3-5 years. Please list one or two specific goals you hope to reach in 5 years. The goal of this project is to use state-of-art particle-in-cell tools

98

NERSC/DOE FES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - Xianzhu Tang  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Xianzhu Tang Xianzhu Tang Xianzhu Tang FES Requirements Worksheet 1.1. Project Information - Plasma materials interaction Document Prepared By Xianzhu Tang Project Title Plasma materials interaction Principal Investigator Xianzhu Tang Participating Organizations Los Alamos National Laboratory Funding Agencies DOE SC DOE NSA NSF NOAA NIH Other: 2. Project Summary & Scientific Objectives for the Next 5 Years Please give a brief description of your project - highlighting its computational aspect - and outline its scientific objectives for the next 3-5 years. Please list one or two specific goals you hope to reach in 5 years. This project combines kinetic modeling of boundary plasma and atomistic modeling of wall material response to plasma irradiation to understand the

99

NERSC/DOE BES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - Mark Jarrell  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Mark Jarrell Mark Jarrell Mark Jarrell BES Requirements Worksheet 1.1. Project Information - SciDAC: Next Generation Multi-Scale Quantum Simulation Software for Strongly Correlated Materials Document Prepared By Mark Jarrell Project Title SciDAC: Next Generation Multi-Scale Quantum Simulation Software for Strongly Correlated Materials Principal Investigator Mark Jarrell Participating Organizations Louisiana State University Ohio SuperComputer Center UC Davis ORNL Funding Agencies DOE SC DOE NSA NSF NOAA NIH Other: 2. Project Summary & Scientific Objectives for the Next 5 Years Please give a brief description of your project - highlighting its computational aspect - and outline its scientific objectives for the next 3-5 years. Please list one or two specific goals you hope to reach in 5

100

NERSC/DOE FES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - Alex Friedman  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Alex Friedman Alex Friedman Alex Friedman FES Requirements Worksheet 1.1. Project Information - Simulation of intense beams for heavy-ion-fusion science (HEDLP / Inertial Fusion Energy) Document Prepared By Alex Friedman Project Title Simulation of intense beams for heavy-ion-fusion science (HEDLP / Inertial Fusion Energy) Principal Investigator Alex Friedman Participating Organizations LBNL, LLNL, PPPL, Univ. of Maryland Funding Agencies DOE SC DOE NSA NSF NOAA NIH Other: 2. Project Summary & Scientific Objectives for the Next 5 Years Please give a brief description of your project - highlighting its computational aspect - and outline its scientific objectives for the next 3-5 years. Please list one or two specific goals you hope to reach in 5 years. The US Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory (HIFS-VNL), a

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

NERSC/DOE BES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - Jeffrey B. Neaton  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Jeffrey B. Neaton Jeffrey B. Neaton Jeffrey B. Neaton BES Requirements Worksheet 1.1. Project Information - Charge Transport and Excited States at Interfaces in Nanostructured Materials Document Prepared By Jeffrey B. Neaton Project Title Charge Transport and Excited States at Interfaces in Nanostructured Materials Principal Investigator Jeffrey B. Neaton Participating Organizations Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Funding Agencies DOE SC DOE NSA NSF NOAA NIH Other: 2. Project Summary & Scientific Objectives for the Next 5 Years Please give a brief description of your project - highlighting its computational aspect - and outline its scientific objectives for the next 3-5 years. Please list one or two specific goals you hope to reach in 5 years. Over the next 3-5 years, we seek to develop and apply first-principles

102

NERSC/DOE FES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - Zhihong Lin  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Zhihong Lin Zhihong Lin Zhihong Lin FES Requirements Worksheet 1.1. Project Information - SciDAC GSEP Center and GPS-TTBP Center Document Prepared By Zhihong Lin Project Title SciDAC GSEP Center and GPS-TTBP Center Principal Investigator Zhihong Lin Participating Organizations University of California, Irvine Funding Agencies DOE SC DOE NSA NSF NOAA NIH Other: 2. Project Summary & Scientific Objectives for the Next 5 Years Please give a brief description of your project - highlighting its computational aspect - and outline its scientific objectives for the next 3-5 years. Please list one or two specific goals you hope to reach in 5 years. The SciDAC GSEP project will further extend the first-principles global gyrokinetic simulations to study new physics in the energetic particle

103

NERSC/DOE FES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - CS Chang  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

CS Chang CS Chang CS Chang FES Requirements Worksheet 1.1. Project Information - Center for Plasma Edge Simulation Document Prepared By CS Chang Project Title Center for Plasma Edge Simulation Principal Investigator CS Chang Participating Organizations New York University, ORNL, PPPL, LBNL, MIT, Columbia U., Rutgers U. Lehigh U., Georgia Tech, Auburn U., U. Colorado, U. California at Irvine, Caltech, Hinton Associates Funding Agencies DOE SC DOE NSA NSF NOAA NIH Other: 2. Project Summary & Scientific Objectives for the Next 5 Years Please give a brief description of your project - highlighting its computational aspect - and outline its scientific objectives for the next 3-5 years. Please list one or two specific goals you hope to reach in 5 years. Develop the XGC large scale edge kinetic codes further for higher fidelity

104

Westinghouse and Fuzhou Permitted to Restart Distribution of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Westinghouse and Fuzhou Permitted to Restart Distribution of Light Bulb Products Westinghouse and Fuzhou Permitted to Restart Distribution of Light Bulb Products August 6, 2010 -...

105

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUEST BY SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION (SWPC)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

S* * S* * STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUEST BY SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION (SWPC) FOR AN ADVANCED WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN PATENT RIGHTS UNDER CONTRACT NO. DE-FC02-00CH11048, CH-1053, W(A)-01-006 The Petitioner, Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation (SWPC), has requested a waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights for all subject inventions under DOE Contract No. DE-FC02-00CH11048, "Research and Development for Advanced Materials in Advanced Industrial Gas Turbines". In order to avoid fragmenting the technology, and thus adversely affect its assimilation and commercial development, as well as to enable SWPC to meet its cost sharing commitment, SWPC has requested that the waiver extend to both its own employees and those of its subcontractors, except subcontractors eligible to retain title to inventions

106

IDENTIFICATION OF DOE'S POST-CLOSURE MONITORING NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 2006 plan sets an ambitious agenda for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM) and the remediation of sites contaminated by decades of nuclear weapons production activities. The plan's primary objective is to reduce overall clean up costs by first eliminating the environmental problems that are most expensive to control and safely maintain. In the context of the 2006 Plan, closure refers to the completion of area or facility specific cleanup projects. The cleanup levels are determined by the planned future use of the site or facility. Use restrictions are still undecided for most sites but are highly probable to exclude residential or agricultural activities. Most of the land will be remediated to ''industrial use'' levels with access restrictions and some areas will be closed-off through containment. Portions of the site will be reserved for waste disposal, either as a waste repository or the in-situ immobilization of contaminated soil and groundwater, and land use will be restricted to waste disposal only. The land used for waste disposal will require monitoring and maintenance activities after closure. Most of the land used for industrial use may also require such postclosure activities. The required postclosure monitoring and maintenance activities will be imposed by regulators and stakeholders. Regulators will not approve closure plans without clearly defined monitoring methods using approved technologies. Therefore, among all other more costly and labor-intensive closure-related activities, inadequate planning for monitoring and lack of appropriate monitoring technologies can prevent closure. The purpose of this project is to determine, document, and track the current and evolving postclosure monitoring requirements at DOE-EM sites. This information will aid CMST-CP in guiding its postclosure technology development and deployment efforts.

M.A. Ebadian, Ph.D.

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Division related to four noncompliances with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Rule andor the Occupational Radiation Protection Rule at DOE's Waste Isolation...

108

Comparison of selected DOE and non-DOE requirements, standards, and practices for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document results from the Secretary of Energy`s response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 94--2. The Secretary stated that the US Department of Energy (DOE) would ``address such issues as...the need for additional requirements, standards, and guidance on low-level radioactive waste management. `` The authors gathered information and compared DOE requirements and standards for the safety aspects Of low-level disposal with similar requirements and standards of non-DOE entities.

Cole, L. [Cole and Associates (United States); Kudera, D.; Newberry, W. [Lockheed Idaho Technologies Co., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- November 14, 2003  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Criticality Safety Violations at the Savannah River Site

110

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- April 19, 2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Employee Reprisal at the Savannah River Site

111

Microsoft Word - DOE RFI - NBP RFI Communications Requirements.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Donahue Ferry Road P.O. Box 5000 Pineville, LA 71361-5000 www.cleco.com Tel. 318-484-7400 July 12, 2010 U. S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave, SW, Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585 Subject: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Introduction Cleco Corporation greatly appreciates the opportunity to provide information to the Department of Energy (DOE) on the communications needs of utilities. Cleco is an energy services company based in central Louisiana, serving approximately 276,000 residential, commercial and industrial customers since 1934. Cleco manages over 3,000 megawatts of electric capacity through its regulated Cleco Power LLC and unregulated Cleco Midstream Resources LLC businesses, utilizing a diverse fuel mix of lignite, coal, petcoke and natural gas. With 1,300 employees, Cleco manages and operates 70 transmission

112

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-01 2-01 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - EA-2002-01 March 19, 2002 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Safety Basis and Radiation Protection Violations at the Savannah River Site, During the period December 11-13, 2001, the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) conducted an on-site investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding ten events that were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) and/or the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) during 2001. These events included work control deficiencies that resulted in violations of your facility safety basis requirements, and As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) deficiencies that

113

POLICY GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM #33- Requirements for DOE Delegated Examining Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The purpose of this guidance is to establish the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Delegated Examining policy and procedures in order to ensure an effective competitive examining program that supports...

114

New Justification Memos - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirement...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Justification Memos by Diane Johnson DOE N 200.1 - Notice of Intent to Develop an Information Sharing and Safeguarding Program Notice DOE G 580.1-1 - Notice of Intent to Revise...

115

Notice of Intent to Develop DOE O 470.5, Integrating Existing Technical Security Program Requirements  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This memorandum provides justification for the development of one integrated and consolidated set of requirements for the Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Security Program (TSP). This Order will combine the existing necessary requirements from DOE Manual (M) 205.1-3, Telecommunications Security Manual, dated 4-17-2006 and DOE M 470.4-4A chg.1, Information Security Manual, dated 10-12-2010; Section D -Technical Surveillance Countermeasures, into a single DOE Order defining the DOE TSP.

2013-08-21T23:59:59.000Z

116

Applying DOE O 414.1C and NQA-1 Requirements to ISM Software...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

More Documents & Publications DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance...

117

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUEST BY SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORP. FOR AN ADVANCE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORP. FOR AN ADVANCE WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORP. FOR AN ADVANCE WAIIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN INVENTION RIGHTS UNDER DOE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. DE-FC26-03NT41907; W(A)-04-018, CH-1187 The Petitioner, Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation, (Siemens) was awarded this subcontract under a cooperative agreement with the Energy and Environmental Research Corporation (EERC) for the performance of work entitled, "Water Extraction from Coal-Fired Power Plant Flue Gas." The purpose of the cooperative agreement is to develop a liquid desiccant- based, flue gas dehydration process technology to reduce water consumption in power plants. Specifically, the objective of the program is to generate sufficient sub-scale test data and conceptual commercial power plant evaluation to assess the process feasibility and merits for

118

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUEST BY SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN INVENTION RIGHTS UNDER DOE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT No. DE-FC26-01NT41232 W(A)-02-020, CH-1103 The Petitioner, Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation (Siemens), was awarded this cooperative agreement for the performance of work entitled, "On-Line Thermal Barrier Coating Monitor for Real-Time Failure Protection and Life Maximization." The purpose of the cooperative agreement is to develop and demonstrate an on-line thermal barrier coatingi (TBC) monitor for critical engine components, row 1 turbine blades and vanes. This on-line TBC monitor represents an important advancement toward achieving the program goals of improved reliability availability and maintainability (RAM) of existing and advanced gas turbine power plants by

119

Radioactive waste isolation in salt: peer review of Westinghouse Electric Corporation's report on reference conceptual designs for a repository waste package  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the findings of the peer panel constituted by Argonne National Laboratory to review Region A of Westinghouse Electric Corporation's report entitled Waste Package Reference Conceptual Designs for a Repository in Salt. The panel determined that the reviewed report does not provide reasonable assurance that US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements for waste packages will be met by the proposed design. It also found that it is premature to call the design a ''reference design,'' or even a ''reference conceptual design.'' This review report provides guidance for the preparation of a more acceptable design document.

Rote, D.M.; Hull, A.B.; Was, G.S.; Macdonald, D.D.; Wilde, B.E.; Russell, J.E.; Kruger, J.; Harrison, W.; Hambley, D.F.

1985-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

DOE Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 04)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 04), April 21, 2014.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

DOE Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Minimum Appliance Standards DOE Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners Violating Minimum Appliance Standards June 3, 2010 - 2:17pm Addthis...

122

Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor balance of plant and supporting systems design  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor (SMR) is an 800 MWt (>225 MWe) integral pressurized water reactor (iPWR), in which all of the components typically associated with the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) of a nuclear power plant are incorporated within a single reactor pressure vessel. This paper is the second in a series of four papers which describe the design and functionality of the Westinghouse SMR. It focuses, in particular, upon the supporting systems and the balance of plant (BOP) designs of the Westinghouse SMR. Several Westinghouse SMR systems are classified as safety, and are critical to the safe operation of the Westinghouse SMR. These include the protection and monitoring system (PMS), the passive core cooling system (PXS), and the spent fuel cooling system (SFS) including pools, valves, and piping. The Westinghouse SMR safety related systems include the instrumentation and controls (I and C) as well as redundant and physically separated safety trains with batteries, electrical systems, and switch gears. Several other incorporated systems are non-safety related, but provide functions for plant operations including defense-in-depth functions. These include the chemical volume control system (CVS), heating, ventilation and cooling (HVAC) systems, component cooling water system (CCS), normal residual heat removal system (RNS) and service water system (SWS). The integrated performance of the safety-related and non-safety related systems ensures the safe and efficient operation of the Westinghouse SMR through various conditions and transients. The turbine island consists of the turbine, electric generator, feedwater and steam systems, moisture separation systems, and the condensers. The BOP is designed to minimize assembly time, shipping challenges, and on-site testing requirements for all structures, systems, and components. (authors)

Memmott, M. J.; Stansbury, C.; Taylor, C. [Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, 600 Cranberry Woods Drive, Cranberry Twp. PA 16066 (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Enforcement handbook: Enforcement of DOE nuclear safety requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Handbook provides detailed guidance and procedures to implement the General Statement of DOE Enforcement Policy (Enforcement Policy or Policy). A copy of this Enforcement Policy is included for ready reference in Appendix D. The guidance provided in this Handbook is qualified, however, by the admonishment to exercise discretion in determining the proper disposition of each potential enforcement action. As discussed in subsequent chapters, the Enforcement and Investigation Staff will apply a number of factors in assessing each potential enforcement situation. Enforcement sanctions are imposed in accordance with the Enforcement Policy for the purpose of promoting public and worker health and safety in the performance of activities at DOE facilities by DOE contractors (and their subcontractors and suppliers) who are indemnified under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act. These indemnified contractors, and their suppliers and subcontractors, will be referred to in this Handbook collectively as DOE contractors. It should be remembered that the purpose of the Department`s enforcement policy is to improve nuclear safety for the workers and the public, and this goal should be the prime consideration in exercising enforcement discretion.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

DOE's General Counsel Announces New Policy Requiring Online Posting of NEPA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE's General Counsel Announces New Policy Requiring Online Posting DOE's General Counsel Announces New Policy Requiring Online Posting of NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determinations to Further Transparency DOE's General Counsel Announces New Policy Requiring Online Posting of NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determinations to Further Transparency October 15, 2009 - 10:09am Addthis Washington, DC - Consistent with the President's commitment to "disclose information rapidly in forms that the public can readily find and use," DOE announced today a new policy requiring all DOE program and field offices to document certain categorical exclusion determinations and post them online. Categorical exclusions are classes of actions that DOE has determined by regulation do not have a significant effect on the environment, and, therefore, normally do not require detailed environmental

125

NERSC/DOE BES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - Normand Modine  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Modine BES Requirements Worksheet 1.1. Project Information - Center for Integrated Nanotechnology (CINT) - Theory and Simulation Thrust Document Prepared By Normand Modine Project...

126

NERSC/DOE FES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - Alex Friedman  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Friedman FES Requirements Worksheet 1.1. Project Information - Simulation of intense beams for heavy-ion-fusion science (HEDLP Inertial Fusion Energy) Document Prepared By...

127

NERSC/DOE FES Requirements Workshop Worksheet - Brian Wirth  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Brian Wirth Brian Wirth Brian Wirth 1.1. Project Information - Modeling plasma - surface interactions Document Prepared By Brian Wirth Project Title Modeling plasma - surface interactions Principal Investigator Brian Wirth Participating Organizations University of California, Berkeley; University of Tennessee; Oak Ridge National Laboratory Funding Agencies DOE SC DOE NSA NSF NOAA NIH Other: 2. Project Summary & Scientific Objectives for the Next 5 Years Please give a brief description of your project - highlighting its computational aspect - and outline its scientific objectives for the next 3-5 years. Please list one or two specific goals you hope to reach in 5 years. It is acknowledged that plasma-material interactions pose an immense scientific challenge and are one of the most critical issues in magnetic

128

Confined space entry program for the Westinghouse Hanford Company  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To comply with anticipated OSHA regulatory requirements concerning Permit-Required Confined Spaces, Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) created a Confined Spaces Task Team. The primary focus of the task team was to prepare a formal Confined Space Entry (CSE) Program that would ensure full compliance with the anticipated OSHA requirements. A comprehensive training plan was also prepared and submitted for approval as soon as the new CSE Program was approved and released for implementation. On January 14, 1993, OSHA released their final ruling which contained several further changes, requiring the WHC Confined Space Entry Program and Training Plan to be revised. The revised training manual and lessons learned in establishing a Confined Space Entry Program are presented.

Cornell, T.M.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Security Requirements for Remote Access to DOE and Applicable Contractor Information Technology Systems  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Notice establishes DOE policy requirements and responsibilities for remote connections to DOE and contractor information technology systems. The Notice will also ensure compliance with the requirements of DOE O 205.1, Department of Energy Cyber Security Management Program, dated 3-21-03, to protect DOE information and information technology systems commensurate with the risk and magnitude of harm that could result from their unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification or destruction. DOE N 205.15, dated 3/18/05, extends this directive until 3/18/06. No cancellations.

2004-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

130

DOE-STD-1082-94; DOE Standard Preparation, Review, and Approval of Implementaiton Plans For Nuclear Safety Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

82-94 82-94 October 1994 DOE STANDARD PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615)576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE95001461 DOE-STD-1082-94 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard has been prepared by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health with the assistance of Steve

131

Assembly of radioisotope power systems at Westinghouse Hanford Company  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Long-term space flight requires reliable long-term power sources. For the purpose of supplying a constant supply of power in deep space, the radioisotope thermoelectric generator has proven to be a successful power source. Westinghouse Hanford Company is installing the Radioisotope Power Systems Facility which is located in the Fuels and Material Examination Facility on the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington, for assembling the generators. The radioisotope thermoelectric generator assembly process is base upon one developed at Mound Laboratory in Miamisburg, Ohio (presently operated by EG G Mound Applied Technologies). Westinghouse Hanford Company is modernizing the process to ensure the heat source assemblies are produced in a manner that maximizes operator safety and is consistent with today's environmental and operational safety standards. The facility is being prepared to assemble the generators required by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration missions for CRAF (Comet Rendezvous Asteroid Flyby) in 1995 and Cassini, an investigation of Saturn and its moons, in 1996. The facility will also have the capability to assemble larger radioisotope power generators designed for dynamic power generation. 4 refs., 11 figs.

Alderman, C.J.

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

SSN comments to DOE NBP RFI communications requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Comms Requirements Comms Requirements 12 July 2010 1/6 Michael Jung // Policy Director // Silver Spring Networks 888.406.1882 // mjung@silverspringnet.com (1) What are the current and future communications needs of utilities, including for the deployment of new Smart Grid applications, and how are these needs being met? Utilitiesʼ current communications needs are diverse, with considerable variation from utility to utility. Current communications needs that are related to, but generally pre-date, smart grid include: * System control and data acquisition (SCADA) * Drive-by meter reading * One-way direct load control * Mobile workforce management * Demand response, dynamic pricing for commercial/industrial customers In the smart grid-enabled future, utility smart grid applications will require

133

DOE-HDBK-1163-2003; Integration of Multiple Hazard Analysis Requirements and Activities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-HDBK-1163-2003 October 2003 DOE HANDBOOK INTEGRATION OF MULTIPLE HAZARD ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS AND ACTIVITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS DOE-HDBK-1163-2003 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. It is available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-HDBK-1163-2003 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) standard is approved for use by all DOE Components and

134

Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Tracking Document for Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) 4/17/2013 In the time since Revision 02 of the DOE Challenge Home National Program Requirements was released, DOE has modified, clarified, and refined various aspects of the program documents, primarily in response to partner questions and comments. This document is a summary of these edits, organized by the section of the National Program Requirements in which they appear. DOE has also posted the revised National Program Requirements, labeled Rev. 03, on its Web site at www.buildings.energy.gov/challenge. All revisions are categorized as a Change, Clarification, or Refinement. These are defined as follows: Change - The addition, deletion, or modification of a program requirement. A change will typically result from a partner

135

Introduction to DOE Order 435.1 Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Introduction to DOE Order 435.1 Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Requirements Christine Gelles*, U.S. Department of Energy ; Edward Regnier, U.S. Department of Energy; Andrew Wallo, U.S. Department of Energy Abstract: The Atomic Energy Act gives the U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE), the authority to regulate the management of radioactive waste generated by US DOE. This session will discuss DOE Order 435.1, which is protective of workers, public, and environment through specific requirements for the generation, treatment, storage, and disposal of US DOE radioactive waste. The Order is divided into four chapters: General Requirements, High-Level Waste, Transuranic Waste and Low-Level Waste. The requirements are consistent with existing promulgated Federal requirements but are specific to waste generated and disposed at US DOE facilities. A technical standard with requirements for documentation supporting the Disposal Authorization for a facility is also being prepared as well as a guide to accompany the Order. US DOE is in the process of updating the Order to maintain consistency with current practices and to increase efficiency in waste management. The draft Order will be available for public comment prior to being finalized.

136

DOE Order 458.1 Property Clearance Requirements and Factors Considered to Update Its Clearance Limits  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE Order 458.1 Property Clearance Requirements and Factors Considered to Update Its Clearance Limits Carlos Corredor*, U.S. Department of Energy ;Gustavo Vasquez, U.S. Department of Energy; Derek Favret, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation will provide an explanation of the property clearance requirements contained in DOE O 458.1, including the methods to release or clear property: process knowledge and authorized limits. In addition, it will provide a special focus on the efforts to update the surface guidelines table in DOE directives. In planning to update its property clearance criteria DOE is considering many factors; such as their protectiveness, whether they are dose-based, consistency with voluntary consensus standards and national and international radiation protection recommendations, and consistency with DOE dose constraints. One option being considered is a hybrid approach using a national consensus standard for personal property and DOE derived values for real property.

137

Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes selection, training, qualification, and certification requirements for contractor personnel who can impact the safety basis through their involvement in the operation, maintenance, and technical support of Hazard Category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities. Cancels DOE O 5480.20A. Admin Chg 1, dated 7-29-13, cancels DOE O 426.2.

2010-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

138

Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03), 4/17/2013, from the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy website.

139

Westinghouse-CASL team wins major computing award for reactor...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

throughout the world. In 1957 the company supplied the world's first PWR in Shippingport, Pennsylvania. Today, Westinghouse technology is the basis for approximately...

140

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- June 4, 1996  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Potential Violations of the Quality Assurance and Occupational Radiation Protection Rules at the Savannah River Site

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

REQUEST BY WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ELECTRIC CORPORATION ELECTRIC CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RIGHTS IN SUBJECT INVENTIONS MADE IN THE COURSE OF OR UNDER DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. DE-FC26-97FT34139; DOE WAIVER DOCKET W(A)-97-007 [CH0918] The Westinghouse Electric Corporation has made a timely request for an advance waiver of worldwide rights in Subject Inventions made in the course of or under Department of Energy (DOE) Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC26-97FT34139. The goal of this project is to continue development of the tubular solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology and address the key barrier issues to its commercialization. In addition, Westinghouse will operate prototype megawatt class combined cycle (Solid Oxide Fuel Cell/Gas Turbine) power systems which are

142

Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan (SRP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Standard Review Plan (SRP), Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities, was developed by the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS)1, Office of the Under Secretary for Nuclear Security, to help strengthen the technical rigor of line management oversight and federal monitoring of DOE nuclear facilities. This SRP (hereafter refers to as the Engineering SRP) provides consistent review guidance to assure that engineering and technical requirements are appropriately applied for the design, operations and disposition2 of DOE nuclear facilities. It is one of a series of three SRPs developed by the CNS. The other two SRPs address: 1) nuclear safety basis program review; and 2) application of requirements of DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, and DOE-STD-1189, Integration of Safety into the Design Process, for DOE Critical Decision (CD) review and approval. These SRPs may be revised in the future to reflect changes in the DOE requirements, lessons learned, and experience/insights from nuclear facility design, operations, and disposition.

143

Westinghouse gasification technology development and projects status  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A joint program between Westinghouse, the Department of Energy, and the Gas Research Institute has shown, through the use of a 35 ton-per-day coal feed process development unit (PDU), that the fluidized bed gasifier is technically feasible and economically attractive. The process has been shown to be simple, controllable, and safe in converting many types of coals, including reactive western coals, caking eastern coals, high ash coals, and run-of-mine coals. The process is efficient because it utilizes many coals at high conversion efficiency with relatively low use of oxidant and steam. Because of its simplicity, its use of available hardware technology, and the absence of tars in the product gas, the system has low capital and operating costs. It can be employed with little adverse environmental impact because of its efficiency, low pollutant output, low water usage, and disposal ash product. Process advantages have been confirmed by independent conceptual designs and cost estimates for commercial-scale applications, including substitute natural gas (SNG), industrial fuel gas, liquid synfuels, and combined cycle power generation. The development program includes unique cost-effective integration of hot and cold small-scale experimental models, a commercial-scale cold flow model, and analytical modeling, together with the PDU, to provide commercial design procedures. Westinghouse commercial designs are utilizing these design tools and the process is now being scaled-up for a commercial-scale demonstration facility.

Daugherty, D. P.; Schmidt, D. K.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

TA-55 Final Safety Analysis Report Comparison Document and DOE Safety Evaluation Report Requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides an overview of changes to the currently approved TA-55 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) that are included in the upgraded FSAR. The DOE Safety Evaluation Report (SER) requirements that are incorporated into the upgraded FSAR are briefly discussed to provide the starting point in the FSAR with respect to the SER requirements.

Alan Bond

2001-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

Westinghouse Modular Grinding Process - Enhancement of Volume Reduction for Hot Resin Supercompaction - 13491  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In nuclear power plants (NPP) ion exchange (IX) resins are used in several systems for water treatment. Spent resins can contain a significant amount of contaminates which makes treatment for disposal of spent resins mandatory. Several treatment processes are available such as direct immobilization with technologies like cementation, bitumisation, polymer solidification or usage of a high integrity container (HIC). These technologies usually come with a significant increase in final waste volume. The Hot Resin Supercompaction (HRSC) is a thermal treatment process which reduces the resin waste volume significantly. For a mixture of powdered and bead resins the HRSC process has demonstrated a volume reduction of up to 75 % [1]. For bead resins only the HRSC process is challenging because the bead resins compaction properties are unfavorable. The bead resin material does not form a solid block after compaction and shows a high spring back effect. The volume reduction of bead resins is not as good as for the mixture described in [1]. The compaction properties of bead resin waste can be significantly improved by grinding the beads to powder. The grinding also eliminates the need for a powder additive.Westinghouse has developed a modular grinding process to grind the bead resin to powder. The developed process requires no circulation of resins and enables a selective adjustment of particle size and distribution to achieve optimal results in the HRSC or in any other following process. A special grinding tool setup is use to minimize maintenance and radiation exposure to personnel. (authors)

Fehrmann, Henning [Westinghouse Electric Germany GmbH, Dudenstr. 44, D-68167 Mannheim (Germany)] [Westinghouse Electric Germany GmbH, Dudenstr. 44, D-68167 Mannheim (Germany); Aign, Joerg [Westinghouse Electric Germany GmbH, Global D and D and Waste Management, Tarpenring 6, D-22419 Hamburg (Germany)] [Westinghouse Electric Germany GmbH, Global D and D and Waste Management, Tarpenring 6, D-22419 Hamburg (Germany)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

DOE, Westinghouse to Partner with NMJC To Train Radiological...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

to Partner with NMJC To Train Radiological and Waste Handling Technicians Hobbs, NM, December 5, 2001 -- Representatives of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) yesterday...

147

Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC Announces Scholarship Awards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Eddy and Lea counties. Eddy and Lea counties. In Eddy County, $1,000 scholarships were awarded to high school seniors Ashley Fry, Bethany Fry and Katherine Bergstrom, all of Carlsbad; Aaron Navarrete, Loving; and Trenton Guthrie, Artesia. Scholarship funds were directly managed by school officials to target the needs of students. Funds could be used toward higher math and science education degrees, community college associate degrees, technical and vocational programs, tuition, books, or room and board. Westinghouse scholarships also went to Lea County students Felix Gaytan, Jr., Eunice; Joshua Hill, Jal; Vidal Ramirez, Tatum; and Heather Maker, Lovington. Hobbs High School seniors Laura Smith and Robert Edwards shared honors, each receiving a $500 award. "These scholarships reflect the commitment our company has - and I personally

148

Does  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Does Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Yu-San Liu Æ Yining Zeng Æ Yonghua Luo Æ Qi Xu Æ Michael E. Himmel Æ Steve J. Smith Æ Shi-You Ding Received: 26 November 2008 / Accepted: 11 May 2009 / Published online: 19 June 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Exoglucanases are key enzymes required for the efficient hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. It has been proposed that exoglucanases hydrolyze cellulose chains in a processive manner to produce primarily cellobiose. Usually, two functional modules are involved in the processive mechanism: a catalytic module and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). In this report, single molecule tracking techniques were used to analyze the molecular motion of CBMs labeled with quantum dots (QDs) and bound to cellulose crystals. By tracking the single QD, we observed that the family 2 CBM from

149

DOE Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners Violating Minimum Appliance Standards DOE Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners Violating Minimum Appliance Standards June 3, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis Washington, DC - Today, the Department of Energy announced that three manufacturers -- Aspen Manufacturing, Inc., Summit Manufacturing, and Advanced Distributor Products -- must stop distributing 61 heat pump models and 1 air conditioner model that DOE has determined do not comply with federal energy conservation standards. The manufacturers also must notify all of their customers that have been sold noncompliant units. The Department determined that these models were noncompliant based on certification information submitted to DOE for these manufacturers.

150

DOE Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners Violating Minimum Appliance Standards DOE Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners Violating Minimum Appliance Standards June 3, 2010 - 2:17pm Addthis Today, the Department of Energy announced that three manufacturers -- Aspen Manufacturing, Inc., Summit Manufacturing, and Advanced Distributor Products -- must stop distributing 61 heat pump models and 1 air conditioner model that DOE has determined do not comply with federal energy conservation standards. The manufacturers also must notify all of their customers that have been sold noncompliant units. The Department determined that these models were noncompliant based on certification information submitted to DOE for these manufacturers.

151

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Hanford Company - EA-96-02 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hanford Company - Hanford Company - EA-96-02 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Hanford Company - EA-96-02 July 16, 1996 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Westinghouse Hanford Company related to an Unplanned Extremity Exposure to a Worker, (EA-96-02) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding an unplanned [ ] extremity exposure to a worker. The exposure occurred on February 13, 1996, during the removal of a highly contaminated thermocouple tree from a [ ] radioactive waste storage tank at the Hanford Tank Farms facility. The thermocouple tree, which is located within [the tank], was originally used to monitor temperature changes within the tank. A Type C Investigation Board was subsequently convened to investigate this event; the Board issued its

152

Attachment 6, Certification of Intent to Comply with DOE NEPA Requirements/Complete Environmental Questionnaire  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 CERTIFICATION OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH DOE NEPA REQUIREMENTS/COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE The Applicant, , if (name of institution) selected for award under Program Solicitation DE-PS26-02NT41430, "Support of Advanced Fossil Resource Utilization Research by Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Other Minority Institutions," agrees that, it will complete the Environmental Questionnaire within thirty (30) days of request, and provide any other environmental-related data as requested by DOE to satisfy NEPA requirements. (Signature of Authorized Official)

153

Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes selection, training, qualification, and certification requirements for contractor personnel who can impact the safety basis through their involvement in the operation, maintenance, and technical support of Hazard Category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities. Cancels DOE O 5480.20A. Admin Chg 1, dated 7-29-13.

2010-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

154

DOE's General Counsel Announces New Policy Requiring Online Posting of NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determinations to Further Transparency  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Washington, DC - Consistent with the President's commitment to "disclose information rapidly in forms that the public can readily find and use," DOE announced today a new policy requiring all DOE...

155

Siemens Westinghouse Power Generation SWPG | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Siemens Westinghouse Power Generation SWPG Siemens Westinghouse Power Generation SWPG Jump to: navigation, search Name Siemens Westinghouse Power Generation (SWPG) Place Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Zip PA 15235-5 Product Siemens Westinghouse Power Generation is the fuel cell subsidiary of Siemens Power Generation. It develops and manufactures stationary solide oxide fuel cells. Coordinates 40.438335°, -79.997459° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":40.438335,"lon":-79.997459,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

156

Siemens Westinghouse Advanced Turbine Systems Program Final Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE ADVANCED TURBINE SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE ADVANCED TURBINE SYSTEMS PROGRAM FINAL SUMMARY Ihor S. Diakunchak Greg R. Gaul Gerry McQuiggan Leslie R. Southall Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation 4400 Alafaya Trail Orlando, Florida 32826-2399 ABSTRACT This paper summarises achievements in the Siemens Westinghouse Advanced Turbine Systems (ATS) Program. The ATS Program, co-funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, was a very successful multi-year (from 1992 to 2001) collaborative effort between government, industry and participating universities. The program goals were to develop technologies necessary for achieving significant gains in natural gas-fired power generation plant efficiency, a reduction in emissions, and a decrease in cost of electricity, while maintaining current

157

Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC Earns Superior Star Award for...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

our number one priority at WIPP," said Dr. Triay. "Westinghouse has built an outstanding safety culture at WIPP and demonstrates a superior commitment to the safety and health of...

158

LWZ-0031- In the Matter of Westinghouse Hanford Company  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This determination will consider a Motion to Dismiss filed by Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) on April 5, 1994. In its Motion, WHC seeks the dismissal of the underlying complaint and hearing...

159

DOE Requires Air-Con International to Cease Sales of Inefficient Air  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Requires Air-Con International to Cease Sales of Inefficient Requires Air-Con International to Cease Sales of Inefficient Air Conditioners and Proposes Penalties DOE Requires Air-Con International to Cease Sales of Inefficient Air Conditioners and Proposes Penalties September 21, 2010 - 6:43pm Addthis The Department has issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination and Proposed Civil Penalty to Air-Con, International, requiring Air-Con to cease the sale of certain air-conditioning systems in the United States and proposing a civil penalty of $231,090 for sales of these products in violation of the applicable energy efficiency standards. This action reflects the Department's continued commitment to act aggressively to remove unlawful products from the market. In March, 2010, the Department issued a subpoena requiring Air-Con to

160

DOE Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners Violating Minimum Appliance Standards DOE Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners Violating Minimum Appliance Standards June 3, 2010 - 2:17pm Addthis Today, the Department of Energy announced that three manufacturers -- Aspen Manufacturing, Inc., Summit Manufacturing, and Advanced Distributor Products -- must stop distributing 61 heat pump models and 1 air conditioner model that DOE has determined do not comply with federal energy conservation standards. The manufacturers also must notify all of their customers that have been sold noncompliant units. The Department determined that these models were noncompliant based on certification information submitted to DOE for these manufacturers.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-02: DOE Enforcement Activities of Internal Dosimetry Program Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedure entitled Enforcement of DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements under Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH Enforcement) to issue clarifying guidance in a timely manner with respect to the processes used in its enforcement activities. The focus of this enforcement guidance clarifies internal dosimetry program requirements identified by the Department of Energy’s nuclear safety requirements in 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection Programs) and 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements). To develop the enforcement guidance, EH Enforcement convened a DOE working group which included representatives from the Field Office elements and the Office of Worker Protection Programs and Hazards Management, which is the office responsible for the content and technical clarifications of 10 CFR 835. The guide discusses the following areas: (1) prospective determination of employees that are “likely to receive” 100 millirem (mrem) or greater per 10 CFR 835.402, (Individual Monitoring); (2) application of enforcement policy in taking credit for respiratory protection in prospective determinations; (3) use of contractor’s policies regarding personnel internal exposure to radioactive material; (4) As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) programs; (5) clarification of enforcement with regard to internal dosimetry programs; and Final Comments.

162

Modification of the U.S. Department of Energy`s (DOE) sytem of radiation protection requirements and guidance  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE has undertaken a major modification of its system of radiation protection guidance and requirements. The objectives of this modification are to (1) eliminate unnecessary and redundant requirements, (2) clearly delineate requirements from guidance, (3) codify all radiation protection requirements, and (4) move from a compliance based approach towards a performance based approach. To achieve these objectives DOE has (1) canceled DOE Order 5480.11, {open_quotes}Radiation Protection for DOE Workers,{close_quotes} DOE Order 5480.15, {open_quotes}Department of Energy Laboratory Accreditation Program (DOELAP) for Personnel Dosimetry,{close_quotes} and DOE Notice 5400.13, {open_quotes}Sealed Radioactive Source Accountability,{close_quotes} (2) converted the DOE Radiological Control (RadCon) Manual from mandatory to non mandatory status, and (3) issued DOE Notice 441.1 to maintain those requirements (not in 10 CFR 835) considered necessary for radiation protection of workers. DOE has initiated actions to (1) amend 10 CFR 835 (the Federal rule on occupational radiation protection in the DOE complex) to incorporate the requirements, or their equivalent, in DOE Notice 441.1, (2) issue a technical standard containing guidance on DOELAP, (3) reissue the DOE RadCon Manual as a non mandatory technical standard that reflects the amendments to 10 CFR 835, and (4) revise the implementation guides on radiation protection for consistency with 10 CFR 835 and the RadCon Manual. As a result of these modifications, the system of radiation protection in the DOE will become more comparable with the system of radiation protection used by commercial industry and with the system of protection applied to other areas of worker health and safety.

O`Connell, P.V.; Rabovsky, J.L.; Zobel, S.G. [Department of Energy, Germantown, MD (United States)

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

163

REQUEST BY WESTINGHOUSE POWER GENERATION, A FORMER DIVISION OF CBS CORPORATION, FOR AN  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CONTRACT NO. CONTRACT NO. DE-AC21-95MC30247; DOE WAIVER DOCKET W(A)-98-006 [ORO-737] Westinghouse Power Generation, a former division of CBS Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "the Contractor"), has requested an advance waiver of worldwide rights in Subject Inventions made in the course of or under Department of Energy (DOE) Contract No. DE-AC21- 95MC30247. This contract covers Phase 2 of DOE's Advance Turbine System (ATS) program. The goal of the ATS program is to develop and commercialize ultra-high efficiency, environmentally superior, and cost-competitive gas turbine systems for base-load applications in the utility, independent power producer, and industrial markets. The purposes of Phase 2 were to complete conceptual design of a selected system, identify technical barrier issues and begin

164

REQUEST BY WESTINGHOUSE POWER GENERATION, A FORMER DIVISION OF CBS CORPORATION, FOR AN  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COOPERATIVE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. DE-FC21-95MC32267; DOE WAIVER DOCKET W(A)-96-002 [ORO-620] Westinghouse Power Generation, a former division of CBS Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "the Participant"), has made a timely request for an advance waiver of worldwide rights in Subject Inventions made in the course of or under Department of Energy (DOE) Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC21-95MC32267. The goal of this project is to continue development of the advance turbine system (ATS) technology and address the key barrier issues to its commercialization. In particular, the Participant will demonstrate (at an appropriate scale) the technology readiness of parts and subsystems critical to its gas-fired ATS. The work is sponsored by the Office of Fossil Energy. This cooperative agreement is Phase 3 of DOE's ATS

165

Westinghouse earns top award from quality new mexico  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Earns Top Award Earns Top Award From Quality New Mexico CARLSBAD, N.M., January 11, 2000 - The Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division led a group of three Carlsbad organizations recognized by Quality New Mexico as a recipient of the highest honor in the 1999 New Mexico Quality Awards program. Westinghouse was one of only two organizations statewide to garner the coveted Quality New Mexico Zia Award. Los Alamos National Bank was the other Zia winner. " I congratulate the leaders and employees of the Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division and Los Alamos National Bank for receiving the state' s highest award for quality achievement," said New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, who attended the awards presentation. " The fact that your organizations are recipients of only the third and fourth

166

DOE-HDBK-1139/3-03 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

03 03 DOE-HDBK-1139/3-03 October 23, 2003 Chemical Management (Volume 3 of 3) This Department of Energy Handbook was prepared under the sponsorship of the joint Department of Energy (DOE)/Energy Facility Contractors Group (EFCOG) Chemical Safety Topical Committee (CSTC). It was prepared over a span of four years by the CSTC's Chemical User Safety and Health Requirements Roadmap team (the CUSHR team), consisting of representatives from several sites and DOE headquarters, chaired by Dr. Dave Quigley, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory and co-chaired by Mr. James Morgan, Westinghouse Savannah River Company and Ms. Gail Kleiner, DOE/EH-52. DOE-HDBK-1139/3-03, Chemical Management ( Volume 3 of 3) More Documents & Publications DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2005

167

Microsoft Word - TIA Reply Comments DOE NBP RFI Smart Grid Communications Requirements.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26, 2010 26, 2010 US Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585 Re: NBP RFI-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy The Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) is pleased to provide comments on the communications requirements of electric utilities relevant to smart grid policy. TIA appreciates the proactive role the Department of Energy (DOE) is taking in executing the recommendations from the FCC in the National Broadband Plan. Electric utilities and the ICT industry share a long tradition of partnering to build and maintain the communications networks contributing to the security and reliability of the grid.

168

REQUEST BY SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RIGHTS IN  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U5-30-Z002 04:U5pm Frorm-NlIIUNAL I Nf-NWCY L;CHNULULOY LABUKAI UKY -YI-U4L b4LL 1-411 r.uu6/uuJ U5-30-Z002 04:U5pm Frorm-NlIIUNAL I Nf-NWCY L;CHNULULOY LABUKAI UKY -YI-U4L b4LL 1-411 r.uu6/uuJ r -J Statement of Considerations REQUEST BY SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RIGHTS IN SUBJECT INVENTIONS MADE IN THE COURSE OF OR UNDER DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONTRACT NO. DE-AC26-98FT40355; DOE WAIVER DOCKET W(A)-98-009 [CH-0967] Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "SWPC"), has made a timely request for an advance waiver to worldwide rights in Subject Inventions made in the course of or under Department of Energy (DOE) Contract No. DE-AC26-98FT40355. The scope of the work calls for SWPC to perform a conceptual design and feasibility study of a High Efficiency Fossil-Fueled Power Plant (HEFPP) that incorporates a pressurized tubular solid oxide

169

Analysis of waste treatment requirements for DOE mixed wastes: Technical basis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The risks and costs of managing DOE wastes are a direct function of the total quantities of 3wastes that are handled at each step of the management process. As part of the analysis of the management of DOE low-level mixed wastes (LLMW), a reference scheme has been developed for the treatment of these wastes to meet EPA criteria. The treatment analysis in a limited form was also applied to one option for treatment of transuranic wastes. The treatment requirements in all cases analyzed are based on a reference flowsheet which provides high level treatment trains for all LLMW. This report explains the background and basis for that treatment scheme. Reference waste stream chemical compositions and physical properties including densities were established for each stream in the data base. These compositions are used to define the expected behavior for wastes as they pass through the treatment train. Each EPA RCRA waste code was reviewed, the properties, chemical composition, or characteristics which are of importance to waste behavior in treatment were designated. Properties that dictate treatment requirements were then used to develop the treatment trains and identify the unit operations that would be included in these trains. A table was prepared showing a correlation of the waste physical matrix and the waste treatment requirements as a guide to the treatment analysis. The analysis of waste treatment loads is done by assigning wastes to treatment steps which would achieve RCRA compliant treatment. These correlation`s allow one to examine the treatment requirements in a condensed manner and to see that all wastes and contaminant sets are fully considered.

NONE

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- EA-2000-02  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company, related to Procurement Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement Deficiencies at the Savannah River Site.

171

Factory Acceptance Test Procedure Westinghouse 100 ton Hydraulic Trailer  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Factory Acceptance Test Procedure (FAT) is for the Westinghouse 100 Ton Hydraulic Trailer. The trailer will be used for the removal of the 101-SY pump. This procedure includes: safety check and safety procedures; pre-operation check out; startup; leveling trailer; functional/proofload test; proofload testing; and rolling load test.

Aftanas, B.L. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States)

1994-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

172

Disposition of weapons-grade plutonium in Westinghouse reactors  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We have studied the feasibility of using weapons-grade plutonium in the form of mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel in existing Westinghouse reactors. We have designed three transition cycles from an all LEU core to a partial MOX core. We found that four...

Alsaed, Abdelhalim Ali

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

173

Westinghouse independent safety review of Savannah River production reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Westinghouse Electric Corporation has performed a safety assessment of the Savannah River production reactors (K,L, and P) as requested by the US Department of Energy. This assessment was performed between November 1, 1988, and April 1, 1989, under the transition contract for the Westinghouse Savannah River Company's preparations to succeed E.I. du Pont de Nemours Company as the US Department of Energy contractor for the Savannah River Project. The reviewers were drawn from several Westinghouse nuclear energy organizations, embody a combination of commercial and government reactor experience, and have backgrounds covering the range of technologies relevant to assessing nuclear safety. The report presents the rationale from which the overall judgment was drawn and the basis for the committee's opinion on the phased restart strategy proposed by E.I. du Pont de Nemours Company, Westinghouse, and the US Department of Energy-Savannah River. The committee concluded that it could recommend restart of one reactor at partial power upon completion of a list of recommended upgrades both to systems and their supporting analyses and after demonstration that the organization had assimilated the massive changes it will have undergone.

Leggett, W.D.; McShane, W.J. (Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (USA)); Liparulo, N.J.; McAdoo, J.D.; Strawbridge, L.E. (Westinghouse Electric Corp., Pittsburgh, PA (USA). Nuclear and Advanced Technology Div.); Toto, G. (Westinghouse Electric Corp., Pittsburgh, PA (USA). Nuclear Services Div.); Fauske, H.K. (Fauske and Associates, Inc., Burr Ridge, IL (USA)); Call, D.W. (Westinghouse Savannah R

1989-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

REQUEST BY SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RIGHTS IN  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

POWER CORPORATION FOR POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RIGHTS IN SUBJECT INVENTIONS MADE UNDER SUBCONTRACT NO. C-93-0016532 UNDER DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. DE-FC21-90MC25140; DOE WAIVER DOCKET W(A) 03-012 [CH1139] The Petitioner, Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation (SWPC), is a subcontractor to Southern Company Services, Inc. (SCS) under the subject cost shared cooperative agreement titled "Research and Development of the Hot Gas Cleanup Test Facility for Gasification and Pressurized Combustion." The overall scope of the Department of Energy (DOE) cooperative agreement with SCS calls for the design, construction, and operation of a facility to provide long- term hot gas cleanup and process testing for gasification systems and pressurized fluidized bed

175

REQUEST BY SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

POWER POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RIGHTS IN SUBJECT INVENTIONS MADE IN THE COURSE OF OR UNDER DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONTRACT NO. DE-AC26-98FT40002; DOE WAIVER DOCKET W(A)-98-022 [CH-0988] Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "SWPC"), has made a timely request for an advance waiver to worldwide rights in Subject Inventions made in the course of or under Department of Energy (DOE) Contract No. DE-AC26-98NT40002. The scope of the work calls for SWPC to identify and address the key hot corrosion and oxidation issues that are associated with the utilization of porous metal filter media in pressurized fluidized bed combustion systems. The work is sponsored by the Office of Fossil Energy. The dollar amount of the contract is $1,511,527 with SWPC cost sharing $347,651, or

176

REQUEST BY WESTINGHOUSE POWER GENERATION, A FORMER DIVISION OF CBS CORPORATION, FOR AN  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

GRANT NO. GRANT NO. DE-FG21-94MC32071; DOE WAIVER DOCKET W(A)-98-005 [ORO-736] Westinghouse Power Generation, a former division of CBS Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "the Grantee"), has requested an advance waiver of worldwide rights in Subject Inventions made in the course of or under Department of Energy (DOE) Grant No. DE-FG21-94MC32071. The goal of the grant was to perform system analysis, selection and optimization to develop the next generation of gas-fired advanced turbine systems (ATS's) for green field and repowered electricity generation applications. The goal of the ATS program is to develop and commercialize ultra-high efficiency, environmentally superior, and cost-competitive gas turbine systems for base- load applications in the utility, independent power producer, and industrial markets. This work

177

"Order Module--DOE O 426.2, PERSONNEL SELECTION, TRAINING, QUALIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

"To establish selection, training, qualification, and certification requirements for contractor personnel who can impact the safety basis through their involvement in the operation, maintenance,...

178

Energy Conservation at Westinghouse R&D  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

sumption of electricity (see Figure 2). The first OPEC oil embargo in 1973 caused Westing house to take a strong position to emphasize con servation of fossil fuels in all of its physical plant facilities including R&D. Figure 3 is a his tory of our... CONSERVATION - ENERGY AUDITS What criteria can we develop to measure achievements and establish goals? Figure 10 shows a range of en ergy requirements for schools in Northern United States of America in t~rms of M Btu/sq.ft./year. Figure 11 compares...

Norelli, P.; Roy, V.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

179

DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2003; Chemical Management (Volume 3 of 3) Consolidated Chemical User Safety and Health Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TS TS NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2003 DOE HANDBOOK CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT (Volume 3 of 3) Consolidated Chemical User Safety and Health Requirements U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. September 2003 DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2003 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. It is available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. It is available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

180

DOE  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

DOE DOE /E/A- 0202( 83//Q J Sh or t-T er m En er gy O ut lo ok a to m Quar terly Proje ction s Febru ary 1983 Ene rgy Info rma tion Adm inist ratio n Was hing ton, D.C. t rt jrt .or t lor t lor t .lor t- ior t- ior t <.o rt ort . m .er m -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -T erm -T erm -T erm Nrm ue rgy En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y ^n erg y Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Sh ort -T erm 1 Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

DOE-STD-1033-92; Guide to Good Practices for Operations and Administration Updates Through Required Reading  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-92 3-92 December 1992 CHANGE NOTICE NO.1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION UPDATES THROUGH REQUIRED READING U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No.1 DOE-STD-1033-92 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Operations and Administration Updates Through

182

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- EA-2002-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Safety Basis and Radiation Protection Violations at the Savannah River Site, March 19, 2002 (EA-2002-01)

183

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- EA 98-09  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company, related to Bioassay Program Deficiencies at the Savannah River Site, (EA-98-09)

184

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- EA-2000-08  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company, related to Unplanned Exposures and Radioactive Material Intakes at the Savannah River Site (EA-2000-08)

185

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- EA-97-12  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company, related to an Unplanned Radioactive Material Intake at the Savannah River Site, (EA-97-12)

186

Design and Preliminary Performance Tests of the Westinghouse Electrostatic Generator  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Design and performance characteristics of the Westinghouse electrostatic generator are discussed. Steady voltages of 1.3 Mv at atmospheric pressure and up to a maximum to date of 3.7 Mv at about 75 lb./sq. in. have been used to accelerate hydrogen ions. The maximum steady voltage is limited mainly by sparking along the belts. The voltage remains constant to within 0.5 percent for observing times of several minutes, and at times to within 0.2 percent for a half-minute or so.

W. H. Wells; R. O. Haxby; W. E. Stephens; W. E. Shoupp

1940-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

187

DOE Order 458.1 Property Clearance Requirements and Factors Considered...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

contained in DOE O 458.1, including the methods to release or clear property: process knowledge and authorized limits. In addition, it will provide a special focus on the efforts...

188

Suspect/Counterfeit Items Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1B, Quality Assurance  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides guidance to assist DOE/NNSA and its contractors in mitigating the safety threat of suspect/counterfeit items (S/CIs). Cancels DOE G 440.1-6, Implementation Guide for use with Suspect/Counterfeit Items Requirements of DOE O 440.1, Worker Protection Management; 10 CFR 830.120; and DOE O 5700.6C, Quality Assurance, dated 6-30-97. Canceled by DOE G 414.1-2B.

2004-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

189

DOE Issues Request for Information for Scope Requirements Planning at Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Cincinnati – The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center (EMCBC) today issued a Sources Sought/Request for Information (RFI) seeking 8(a) small business concerns with the capabilities to provide architect-engineer-like services to support a potential upcoming Environmental Management (EM) procurement at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL).

190

Social brains, simple minds: does social complexity really require cognitive complexity?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...social engagement than does interpreting social...us how, at the most fundamental neuronal level, our...system. In The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology...Miller, L.CStories are fundamental to meaning and memory...mind. In The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology...

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

191

LWJ-0004 - In the Matter of Westinghouse Hanford Company | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LWJ-0004 - In the Matter of Westinghouse Hanford Company LWJ-0004 - In the Matter of Westinghouse Hanford Company LWJ-0004 - In the Matter of Westinghouse Hanford Company On February 28, 1994, Helen "Gai" Oglesbee filed a request for hearing under the Department of Energy's Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. This request has been assigned Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Case No. LWA-0006. On May 31, 1994, Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) filed a request that the OHA issue a Protective Order concerning certain documents which the company has agreed to provide to the Government Accountability Project (GAP) and Thad M. Guyer, counsel for Ms. Oglesbee. lwj0004.pdf More Documents & Publications LWZ-0031 - In the Matter of Westinghouse Hanford Company LWA-0006 - In the Matter of Helen Gaidine Oglesbee

192

DOE Requires Air-Con International to Cease Sales of Inefficient...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

requiring Air-Con to submit detailed information about the energy consumption of its products and how Air-Con marketed and sold them in the United States. Based on Air-Con's...

193

G. A. Antaki Westinghouse Savannah River Company Savannah River Site  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

W S R C: M S- 9 5 -0 0 0 8 W S R C: M S- 9 5 -0 0 0 8 Analytical Considerations in the Code Qualification of Piping Systems (U) by G. A. Antaki Westinghouse Savannah River Company Savannah River Site Aiken, South Carolina 29808 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or respnsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark,

194

User requirements for wearable smart textiles: does the usage context matter (medical vs. sports)?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Wearable smart textiles are a promising approach to provide health related services (e.g., permanent monitoring of vital parameters), and can be used in different context (such as sports or health care). But so far, smart textiles [ST] have not significantly ... Keywords: medical technology, smart textiles, technology acceptance, user diversity, user requirements

Julia van Heek, Anne Kathrin Schaar, Bianka Trevisan, Patrycja Bosowski, Martina Ziefle

2014-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

Stability tests of the Westinghouse coil in the International Fusion Superconducting Magnet Test Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Westinghouse coil is one of three forced-flow coils in the six-coil toroidal array of the International Fusion Superconducting Magnet Test Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is wound with an 18-kA, Nb/sub 3/Sn/Cu, cable-in-conduit superconductor structurally supported by aluminum plates and cooled by 4-K, 15-atm supercritical helium. The coil is instrumented to permit measurement of helium temperature, pressure, and flow rate; structure temperature and strain; field; and normal zone voltage. A resistive heater has been installed to simulate nuclear heating, and inductive heaters have been installed to facilitate stability testing. The coil has been tested both individually and in the six-coil array. The tests covered charging to full design current and field, measuring the current-sharing threshold temperature using the resistive heaters, and measuring the stability margin using the pulsed inductive heaters. At least one section of the conductor exhibits a very broad resistive transition (resistive transition index = 4). The broad transition, though causing the appearance of voltage at relatively low temperatures, does not compromise the stability margin of the coil, which was greater than 1.1 J/cm/sup 3/ of strands. In another, nonresistive location, the stability margin was between 1.7 and 1.9 J/cm/sup 3/ of strands. The coil is completely stable in operation at 100% design current in both the single- and six-coil modes.

Dresner, L.; Fehling, D.T.; Lubell, M.S.; Lue, J.W.; Luton, J.N.; McManamy, T.J.; Shen, S.S.; Wilson, C.T.

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

196

Stability tests of the Westinghouse coil in the International Fusion Superconducting Magnet Test Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Westinghouse coil is one of three forced-flow coils in the six-coil toroidal array of the International Fusion Superconducting Magnet Test Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is wound with an 18-kA, Nb/sub 3/Sn/Cu, cable-in-conduit superconductor structurally supported by aluminum plates and cooled by 4-K, 15-atm supercritical helium. The coil has been tested both individually and in the six-coil array. The tests covered charging to full design current and field, measuring the current-sharing threshold temperature using the resistive heaters, and measuring the stability margin using the pulsed inductive heaters. At least one section of the conductor exhibits a very broad resistive transition. The broad transition, though causing the appearance of voltage at relatively low temperatures, does not compromise the stability margin of the coil, which was greater than 1.1J/cm/sup 3/ of strands. In another nonresistive location, the stability margin was between 1.7 and 1.9 J/cm/sup 3/ of strands. The coil is completely stable in operation at 100% design current in both the single- and six-coil modes.

Dresner, L.; Fehling, D.T.; Lubell, M.S.; Lue, J.W.; Luton, J.N.; McManamy, T.J.; Shen, S.S.; Wilson, C.T.

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

197

L1:PAC.P6.04 Westinghouse Test Stand Technical Readiness Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PAC.P6.04 Westinghouse Test Stand Technical Readiness Review Andrew Godfrey ORNL Completed: June 25, 2013 CASL- -2013-01 -000 Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs Consortium...

198

Westinghouse Waste Simulation and Optimization Software Tool - 13493  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Radioactive waste is produced during NPP operation and NPP D and D. Different kinds of waste with different volumes and properties have to be treated. Finding a technically and commercially optimized waste treatment concept is a difficult and time consuming process. The Westinghouse waste simulation and optimization software tool is an approach to study the total life cycle cost of any waste management facility. The tool enables the user of the simulation and optimization software to plan processes and storage buildings and to identify bottlenecks in the overall waste management design before starting detailed planning activities. Furthermore, application of the software enables the user to optimize the number of treatment systems, to determine the minimum design capacity for onsite storage facilities, to identify bottlenecks in the overall design and to identify the most cost-effective treatment paths by maintaining optimal waste treatment technologies. In combination with proven waste treatment equipment and integrated waste management solutions, the waste simulation and optimization software provides reliable qualitative results that lead to an effective planning and minimization of the total project planning risk of any waste management activity. (authors)

Mennicken, Kim [Westinghouse Electric Germany GmbH, Global Waste Management, Dudenstrasse 44, D-68167 Mannheim (Germany)] [Westinghouse Electric Germany GmbH, Global Waste Management, Dudenstrasse 44, D-68167 Mannheim (Germany); Aign, Joerg [Westinghouse Electric Germany GmbH, Global Waste Management, Tarpenring 6, D-22419 Hamburg (Germany)] [Westinghouse Electric Germany GmbH, Global Waste Management, Tarpenring 6, D-22419 Hamburg (Germany)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

Fire protection review, Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Company, Idaho Falls, Idaho  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A fire protection survey was conducted for the Department of Energy at the Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Company, INC., Idaho Falls, Idaho, on April 24--27, April 30--May 4, June 4--8, and June 11--15, 1990. The purpose of the survey was to review the facility's fire protection program and to make recommendations according to the following criteria established by the Department of Energy: (1) Recommendations which would be made as the result of an improved risk or Highly Protected Risk (HPR) fire inspection of an industrial insured facility. (2) Identification of areas which are presently not protected or are inadequately protected where provision of automatic protection would reduce a fire or explosion loss to less than $1 million. (3) Identification of areas where loss potentials exceed $50 million assuming a failure of automatic protection systems and subsequent reliance only on separation and fire walls. (4) Evaluation of adequacy of compliance with recommendations made in prior surveys. Findings and recommendations in this report reflect to some degree the relative importance of the operation and the time to restore it to useful condition in the event that a loss were to occur.

Dobson, P.H.

1990-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

200

Quality Assurance Management System Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides information on principles and practices used to establish and implement an effective quality assurance program or quality management system in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 830. Cancels DOE G 414.1-2. Canceled by DOE G 414.1-2B.

2005-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Supplemental Requirements for the Use of Management and Operating or Other Facility Management Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C., Area  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Notice supplements review and approval requirements of DOE O 350.2A, Use of Management and Operating (M&O) or Other Facility Management Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C., Area, dated 10-29-03.

2005-10-19T23:59:59.000Z

202

Formation of the K30 (group I) capsule in Escherichia coli O9:K30 does not require attachment to lipopolysaccharide lipid A-core.  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...covalent linkage to the LPS core, nor does it require association with KLPS. KLps...proteinase K-treated whole-cell lysates does not preclude the presence of trace amounts...138-186. In E. T. Reitschel (ed.), Handbook of endotoxin. I. chemistry of endotoxin...

P R MacLachlan; W J Keenleyside; C Dodgson; C Whitfield

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

A proliferation resistant hexagonal tight lattice BWR fueled core for increased burnup and reduced fuel storage requirements. Annual progress report: August, 1999 to July, 2000 [DOE NERI  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

(OAK/B204) A proliferation resistant hexagonal tight lattice BWR fueled core for increased burnup and reduced fuel storage requirements. Annual progress report: August, 1999 to July, 2000 [DOE NERI

Hiroshi Takahashi; Upendra Rohatgi; T.J. Downar

2000-08-04T23:59:59.000Z

204

Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides acceptable methods for implementing the safety software quality assurance requirements of draft DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance. Certified 11-3-10. No cancellation.

2005-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

205

DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

"This Department of Energy (DOE or Department) Guide provides information plus acceptable methods for implementing the safety software quality assurance (SQA) requirements of DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, dated 6-17-05. DOE O 414.1C requirements supplement the quality assurance program (QAP) requirements of Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 830, Subpart A, Quality Assurance, for DOE nuclear facilities and activities. The safety SQA requirements for DOE, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and its contractors are necessary to implement effective quality assurance (QA) processes and achieve safe nuclear facility operations. DOE promulgated the safety software requirements and this guidance to control or eliminate the hazards and associated postulated accidents posed by nuclear operations, including radiological operations. Safety software failures or unintended output can lead to unexpected system or equipment failures and undue risks to the DOE/NNSA mission, the environment, the public, and the workers. Thus DOE G 414.1-4 has been developed to provide guidance on establishing and implementing effective QA processes tied specifically to nuclear facility safety software applications. DOE also has guidance1 for the overarching QA program, which includes safety software within its scope. This Guide includes software application practices covered by appropriate national and international consensus standards and various processes currently in use at DOE facilities.2 This guidance is also considered to be of sufficient rigor and depth to ensure acceptable reliability of safety software at DOE nuclear facilities. This guidance should be used by organizations to help determine and support the steps necessary to address possible design or functional implementation deficiencies that might exist and to reduce operational hazards-related risks to an acceptable level. Attributes such as the facility life-cycle stage and the hazardous nature of each facility’s operations should be considered when using this Guide. Alternative methods to those described in this Guide may be used provided they result in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 830 Subpart A and DOE O 414.1C. Another objective of this guidance is to encourage robust software quality methods to enable the development of high quality safety applications."

206

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli CFT073 Is Adapted to Acetatogenic Growth but Does Not Require Acetate during Murine Urinary Tract Infection  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...d-serine (Fig. 1a), though CFT073 does reach stationary phase slightly sooner...sodium acetate as a sole carbon source than does MG1655 as shown in Fig. 1d. These data...metabolism, dissimilatory acetate metabolism does play a role in colonization of the murine...

Andrew T. Anfora; David K. Halladin; Brian J. Haugen; Rodney A. Welch

2008-10-06T23:59:59.000Z

207

ORNL/Sub/79-24712/4 ENGINEERING FIELD EVALUATION OF THE WESTINGHOUSE/DOE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-840R21400 #12;Printed ........................................ 4-1 4.1 Delivered Heating and Cooling .......................... 4-1 4.2 Energy Consumption ................................ 4-5 i #12;4.5 Refrigeration System State Points ...................... 4-5 4.6 Data Acquisition

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

208

DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements March 16, 2010 - 4:28pm...

209

REQUEST BY SIEMENS WESTINGHOUSE POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AND FOREIGN RIGHTS IN SUBJECT INVENTIONS MADE IN THE COURSE OF OR UNDER DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONTRACT NO. DE-AC26-98FT40002; DOE WAIVER DOCKET W(A)-98-022 CH-0988 Siemens...

210

1992 Environmental Summer Science Camp Program evaluation. The International Environmental Institute of Westinghouse Hanford Company  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the 1992 Westinghouse Hanford Company/US Department of Energy Environmental Summer Science Camp. The objective of the ``camp`` was to motivate sixth and seventh graders to pursue studies in math, science, and the environment. This objective was accomplished through hands-on fun activities while studying the present and future challenges facing our environment. The camp was funded through Technical Task Plan, 424203, from the US Department of Energy-Headquarters, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Technology Development,to Westinghouse Hanford Company`s International Environmental Institute, Education and Internship Performance Group.

Not Available

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

Policy Flash 2014-33 Revised Department of Energy (DOE) Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.2 Strategic Sourcing Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Mike Larson at 202-287-1426 or email at Michael.Larson@hq.doe.gov

212

Westinghouse Hanford Company FY 1995 Materials Management Plan (MMP)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The safe and sound operation of facilities and storage of nuclear material are top priorities within Hanford`s environmental management, site restoration mission. The projected materials estimates, based on the Materials Management Plan (MMP) assumptions outlined below, were prepared for Department of Energy (DOE) use in long-range planning. The Hanford MMP covers the period FY 1995 through FY 2005, as directed by DOE. All DOE Richland Operations (RL) Office facilities are essentially funded by the Office of Transition and Facilities Management, Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM). These facilities include PUREX, the UO{sub 3} plant, N-Reactor, T-Plant, K-Basins, FFTF, PFP and the 300 Area Fuel Fabrication facilities. Currently DP provides partial funding for the latter two facilities. Beginning in FY 1996 (in accordance with DOE-HQ MMP assumptions), EM will fund expenses related to the storage, monitoring, and safeguarding of all Special Nuclear Material (SNM) in the PFP. Ownership and costs related to movement and/or stabilization of that material will belong to EM programs (excluding NE material). It is also assumed that IAEA will take over inventory validation and surveillance of EM owned SNM at this time (FY 1996).

Higginson, M.C.

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

Risk-Informed Safety Requirements for H2 Codes and Standards Development - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Aaron Harris (Primary Contact), Jeffrey LaChance, Katrina Groth Sandia National Laboratories P.O. Box 969 Livermore, CA 94551-0969 Phone: (925) 294-4530 Email: apharri@sandia.gov DOE Manager HQ: Antonio Ruiz Phone: (202) 586-0729 Email: Antonio.Ruiz@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: October 1, 2003 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Present results of indoor refueling risk assessment to the * National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Fueling Working Group. Perform and document required risk assessment (with * input from NFPA 2 and others) for developing science- based risk-informed codes and standards for indoor

214

Computer Recommendations for incoming students in 2012-2013 The college of Engineering and Computer Science does not require students to have their own  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Computer Recommendations for incoming students in 2012-2013 The college of Engineering and Computer Science does not require students to have their own personal computer. Students will have access to computers through their department, college, and university here on campus. However we do feel that having

Wu, Shin-Tson

215

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- EA 2004-03  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This letter refers to the Department of Energy’s Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) investigation of the facts and circumstances concerning the unnecessary radiation exposure of three Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) personnel and the subsequent falsification of radiation dose

216

DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy. doeresponseschallengehomecomments.pdf More Documents & Publications Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) DOE...

217

DOE-FLEX: DOE's Telework Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes the requirements and responsibilities for the Departments telework program. Cancels DOE N 314.1.

2013-02-11T23:59:59.000Z

218

Inspection of Westinghouse Savannah River Company Fees for Managing and Operating the Savannah River Site, IG-0377  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

IG-1 IG-1 INFORMATION: Report on "Inspection of Westinghouse Savannah River Company Fees for Managing and Operating the Savannah River Site" The Secretary BACKGROUND: During the first five years of its contract with the Department of Energy, Westinghouse Savannah River Company was paid over $130 million in fees to manage and operate the Savannah River Site. Fees paid to Westinghouse steadily increased over the five year period. For example, fees paid for the last six months of this five year period were over three times as large as fees paid for the first six months. The purpose of this inspection was to review the Department's annual negotiation of total available fees with Westinghouse, and to examine the reasons for the growth

219

Implementation of the Clean Air Act, Title V operating permit program requirements for the U.S. DOE Oak Ridge Reservation facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Title V of the Clean Air Act (CAA) establishes a new permit program requiring major sources and sources subject to Title III (Hazardous Air Pollutants) to obtain a state operating permit. Historically, most states have issued operating permits for individual emission units. Under the Title V permit program, a single permit will be issued for all of the emission units at the facility much like the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. The permit will specify all reporting, monitoring, and record-keeping requirements for the facility. Sources required to obtain permits include (a) major sources that emit 100 tons per year or more of any criteria air contaminant, (b) any source subject to the HAP provisions of Title III, (c) any source subject to the acid rain provisions of Title IV, (d) any source subject to New Source Performance Standards, and (e) any source subject to new source review under the nonattainment or Prevention of Significant Deterioration provisions. The State of Tennessee Title V Operating Permit Program was approved by EPA on August 28, 1996. This paper will provide details of initiatives underway at US Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) Facilities for implementation of requirements under the Title V Operating Permit Program. The ORR encompasses three DOE Facilities: the Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP). The Y-12 Plant manufactures component parts for the national nuclear weapons program; the ORNL is responsible for research and development activities including nuclear engineering, engineering technologies, and the environmental sciences; and the ETTP conducts a variety of research and development activities and is the home of a mixed waste incinerator. Each of the three DOE Facilities is considered a major source under Title V of the CAA.

Humphreys, M.P. [Dept. of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, TN (United States). Environmental Protection Div.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

220

Westinghouse P.O. Box 1970 Hanford COlTlpany Richland, Washington 99352  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Westinghouse P.O. Box 1970 Westinghouse P.O. Box 1970 Hanford COlTlpany Richland, Washington 99352 Hanford Operations and Engineering Contractor for the U S . Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-87RL10930 Approved for Public Release o-vrrorr 91: WHC-MR-0293 Revision 2 _-- Legend and Legacy: Fifty Years of Defense Production at the Hanford Site M. S. Gerber Date Published September 1992 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Manage men t 3 e f e r e n c e WHC-c: INFORMATION RELEASE REEUEST IN 0 Y 3s % - a - - Referencas Available to I n t e n d e d Audience T r a n s m i t to 00E-HQIOffice o f Scienofic and Tacnnical l n f o r m a a o n x u AurhorlRsquestor (PnnredlSignarure) $ & rnS*G&Gec #/L+ f2 lntenaed Audience u a Internal Sponsor s x t e r n

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

DOE-FLEX: DOE's Telework Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The directive establishes the requirements and responsibilities for the Department’s telework program. Canceled by DOE O 314.1.

2011-07-05T23:59:59.000Z

222

DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

O 325.2, Position Management and Classification Sep 24, 2014 Nuclear Explosive and Weapon Surety Program Sep 24, 2014 Nuclear Explosive and Weapon Surety Program Sep 24, 2014...

223

DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

search form enables you to find content on the site by specifying one or more search terms. Remember that you can use the quick search anytime, it's normally good enough, this...

224

Westinghouse Hanford Company operational environmental monitoring annual report, calendar year 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document presents the results of the Westinghouse Hanford Company near-facility operational environmental monitoring for 1994 in the 100, 200/600, and 300/400 Areas of the Hanford Site, in south-central Washington State. Surveillance activities included sampling and analyses of ambient air surface water, groundwater, soil, sediments, and biota. Also, external radiation measurements and radiological surveys were taken at waste disposal sites, radiologically controlled areas, and roads. These activities were conducted to assess and control the effects of nuclear facilities and waste sites on the local environment. In addition, diffuse sources were monitored to determine compliance with Federal, State, and/or local regulations. In general, although effects from nuclear facilities are still seen on the Hanford Site and radiation levels are slightly elevated when compared to offsite locations, the differences are less than in previous years.

Schmidt, J.; Fassett, J.W.; Johnson, A.R.; Johnson, V.G.; Markes, B.M.; McKinney, S.M.; Moss, K.J.; Perkins, C.J.; Richterich, L.R.

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

225

Order Module--SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE FOR USE WITH 10 CFR 830, SUBPART A, QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND DOE O 414.1C, QUALITY ASSURANCE  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

 According to DOE-STD-1146-2007, General Technical Base Qualification Standard, this module was to summarize the quality assurance information found in attachments 3, 4, and 5, of DOE O 414.1C,...

226

The Fe-type nitrile hydratase from Comamonas testosteroni Ni1 does not require an activator accessory protein for expression in Escherichia coli  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

We report herein the functional expression of an Fe-type nitrile hydratase (NHase) without the co-expression of an activator protein or the Escherichia coli chaperone proteins GroES/EL. Soluble protein was obtained when the {alpha}- and {beta}-subunit genes of the Fe-type NHase Comamonas testosteroni Ni1 (CtNHase) were synthesized with optimized E. coli codon usage and co-expressed. As a control, the Fe-type NHase from Rhodococcus equi TG328-2 (ReNHase) was expressed with (ReNHase{sup +Act}) and without (ReNHase{sup -Act}) its activator protein, establishing that expression of a fully functional, metallated ReNHase enzyme requires the co-expression of its activator protein, similar to all other Fe-type NHase enzymes reported to date, whereas the CtNHase does not. The X-ray crystal structure of CtNHase was determined to 2.4 {angstrom} resolution revealing an {alpha}{beta} heterodimer, similar to other Fe-type NHase enzymes, except for two important differences. First, two His residues reside in the CtNHase active site that are not observed in other Fe-type NHase enzymes and second, the active site Fe(III) ion resides at the bottom of a wide solvent exposed channel. The solvent exposed active site, along with the two active site histidine residues, are hypothesized to play a role in iron incorporation in the absence of an activator protein.

Kuhn, Misty L.; Martinez, Salette; Gumataotao, Natalie; Bornscheuer, Uwe; Liu, Dali; Holz, Richard C. (Loyola); (Greifswald)

2012-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

227

DOE Explosives Safety Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Manual describes DOE's explosives safety requirements applicable to operations involving the development, testing, handling, and processing of explosives or assemblies containing explosives.

1996-03-29T23:59:59.000Z

228

Ukraine Loads U.S. Nuclear Fuel into Power Plant as Part of DOE-Ukraine Nuclear Fuel Qualification Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

fficials from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy today (April 8, 2010) participated in a ceremony in Ukraine to mark the insertion of Westinghouse-produced nuclear fuel into a nuclear power plant in Ukraine.

229

The States Training and Education Program (STEP): A success story of Department of Energy (DOE) interacting with other state and federal agencies  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE facilities, if not already faced with the need, could be confronted with the necessity of or request to train civil authorities near DOE facilities. SARA Title 3 and the recent high visibility of DOE safety programs have prompted civil authorities to seek out specialized emergency response training for their community's first responders. In 1988, the states through which the DOE is scheduled to transport transuranic (TRU) waste for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant expressed the concerns that their fire, medical, and law enforcement personnel were not prepared to handle an accident involving shipments of TRU waste. In response, the DOE authorized their contractor, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, to develop and deliver a training program to emergency responders along the transportation routes to mitigate this specific institutional concern. The lessons learned by DOE and Westinghouse in creating, coordinating, and delivering this program could be modified to apply to the concerns of governmental jurisdictions, including adjoining DOE facilities.

Kouba, S.C.; Eaton, O.W.

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

Plan for fully decontaminating and decommissioning of the Westinghouse Advanced Reactors Division Fuel Laboratories at Cheswick, Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The project scope of work included the complete decontamination and decommissioning (D and D) of the Westinghouse ARD Fuel Laboratories at the Cheswick Site in the shortest possible time. This has been accomplished in the following four phases: (1) preparation of documents and necessary paperwork; packaging and shipping of all special nuclear materials in an acceptable form to a reprocessing agency; (2) decontamination of all facilities, glove boxes and equipment; loading of generated waste into bins, barrels and strong wooden boxes; (3) shipping of all bins, barrels and boxes containing waste to the designated burial site; removal of all utility services from the laboratories; (4) final survey of remaining facilities and certification for nonrestricted use; preparation of final report. This volume contains the following 3 attachments: (1) Plan for Fully Decontamination and Decommissioning of the Westinghouse Advanced Reactors Division Fuel Laboratories at Cheswick; (2) Environmental Assessment for Decontamination and Decommissioning the Westinghouse Advanced Reactors Division Plutonium Fuel Laboratories, Cheswick, PA; and (3) WARD-386, Quality Assurance Program Description for Decontamination and Decommissioning Activities.

Not Available

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

231

Radiological Protection for DOE Activities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes radiological protection program requirements that, combined with 10 CFR 835 and its associated implementation guidance, form the basis for a comprehensive program for protection of individuals from the hazards of ionizing radiation in controlled areas. Extended by DOE N 441.3. Cancels DOE 5480.11, DOE 5480.15, DOE N 5400.13, DOE N 5480.11; please note: the DOE radiological control manual (DOE/EH-0256T)

1995-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

232

User Requirements Gathered for  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Workshops to derive and document each DOE SC Office's HPC requirements for NERSC in 2013-14" * Deliverables: Reports that includes both the HPC requirements and supporting...

233

BES Science Network Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

the Basic Energy Sciences Network Requirements Workshop Conducted June 4-5, 2007 BES Science Network Requirements Workshop Basic Energy Sciences Program Office, DOE Office of...

234

DOE G 414  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INITIATED BY: INITIATED BY: http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

235

DOE G 414  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

236

DOE-HDBK-1122-99; Radiological Control Technician Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Radiological Control Technician Training Fundamental Academic Training Instructor's Guide Phase I Coordinated and Conducted for Office of Environment, Safety & Health U.S. Department of Energy DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technician Instructor's Guide ii This page intentionally left blank. DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technician Instructor's Guide iii Course Developers William Egbert Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dave Lent Coleman Research Michael McNaughton Los Alamos National Laboratory Bobby Oliver Lockheed Martin Energy Systems Richard Cooke Argonne National Laboratory Brian Thomson Sandia National Laboratory Michael McGough Westinghouse Savannah River Company Brian Killand Fluor Daniel Hanford Corporation Course Reviewers Technical Standards Managers

237

Functions and requirements for Hanford single-shell tank leakage detection and monitoring  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides the initial functions and requirements for leakage detection and monitoring applicable to past and potential future leakage from the Hanford Site`s 149 single-shell high-level waste tanks. This mission is a part of the overall mission of the Westinghouse Hanford Company Tank Waste Remediation System division to remediate the tank waste in a safe and acceptable manner. Systems engineering principles are being applied to this effort. This document reflects the an initial step in the systems engineering approach to decompose the mission into primary functions and requirements. The document is considered approximately 30% complete relative to the effort required to produce a final version that can be used to support demonstration and/or procurement of technologies. The functions and requirements in this document apply to detection and monitoring of below ground leaks from SST containment boundaries and the resulting soil contamination. Leakage detection and monitoring is invoked in the TWRS Program in three fourth level functions: (1) Store Waste, (2) Retrieve Waste, and (3) Disposition Excess Facilities (as identified in DOE/RL-92-60 Rev. 1, Tank Waste Remediation System Functions and Requirements).

Cruse, J.M.; Ohl, P.C.

1995-04-19T23:59:59.000Z

238

ANNUAL HEATING AND COOLING REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN DAY PERFORMANCE FOR A RESIDENTIAL MODEL IN SIX CLIMATES: A COMPARISON OF NBSLD, BLAST 2, AND DOE-2.1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

glass. The thermal resistance is equivalent to a V-value ofequivalent to the DOE-2.1 parameter GLASS-CONDUCTANCE '" 1.39, when the inside film resistance

Carroll, William L.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

239

DOE standard: Radiological control  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed this Standard to assist line managers in meeting their responsibilities for implementing occupational radiological control programs. DOE has established regulatory requirements for occupational radiation protection in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 835 (10 CFR 835), ``Occupational Radiation Protection``. Failure to comply with these requirements may lead to appropriate enforcement actions as authorized under the Price Anderson Act Amendments (PAAA). While this Standard does not establish requirements, it does restate, paraphrase, or cite many (but not all) of the requirements of 10 CFR 835 and related documents (e.g., occupational safety and health, hazardous materials transportation, and environmental protection standards). Because of the wide range of activities undertaken by DOE and the varying requirements affecting these activities, DOE does not believe that it would be practical or useful to identify and reproduce the entire range of health and safety requirements in this Standard and therefore has not done so. In all cases, DOE cautions the user to review any underlying regulatory and contractual requirements and the primary guidance documents in their original context to ensure that the site program is adequate to ensure continuing compliance with the applicable requirements. To assist its operating entities in achieving and maintaining compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835, DOE has established its primary regulatory guidance in the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides. This Standard supplements the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides and serves as a secondary source of guidance for achieving compliance with 10 CFR 835.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

Waste Receiving and Packaging, Module 2A, Supplemental Design Requirements Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Supplemental Design Requirements Document (SDRD) is used to communicate plant design information from Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) to the US Department of Energy (DOE) and the cognizant Architect Engineer (A/E). Information in the SDRD serves two purposes: to convey design requirements that are too detailed for inclusion in a Functional Design Criteria (FDC) report; and to serve as a means of change control for design commitments in the Conceptual Design Report. The mission of WRAP 2A on the Hanford site is the treatment of contact handled low level mixed waste (MW) for final disposal. The overall systems engineering steps used to reach construction and operation of WRAP 2A are depicted in Figure 1. The WRAP 2A SDRD focuses on the requirements to address the functional analysis provided in Figure 1. This information is provided in sections 2 through 5 of this SDRD. The mission analysis and functional analysis are to be provided in a separate supporting document. The organization of sections 2 through 5 corresponds to the requirements identified in the WRAP 2A functional analysis.

Lamberd, D.L.; Boothe, G.F.; Hinkle, A.L.; Horgos, R.M.; LeClair, M.D.; Nash, C.R.; Ocampo, V.P.; Pauly, T.R.; Stroup, J.L.; Weingardt, K.M.

1994-04-26T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Westinghouse Hanford Company Conduct of Operations Manual: GOCO cross-cultivation committee. Revision 1, Operational excellence task force  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Conduct of Operations is a set of standards which establishes an overall philosophy for achieving excellence in the operation of DOE facilities. These standards have application in many facets of our business and shall be considered by each organization that conducts or supports Operations in their efforts to improve overall organizational performance. The formality and accuracy resulting from the implementation of the elements of this manual will enhance safe operations and result in a higher quality product. The elements of the Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities (DOE 5480.19) are tools to do our work. In like manner the tools and methods given in the Maintenance Management Program (DOE 4330.3A) are complementary and are to be used to the fullest. These DOE documents taken together and integrated into site implementation provide the framework for well operated facilities committed to excellence and not just compliance. The goal of this manual is to promote greater ownership and accountability by each individual worker and supervisor. Evidence of our success will include accountability by workers on the floor and in technical inquisitiveness at all levels. Striving for excellence involves all of us and we should not wait for someone else to find our problems.

Not Available

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

DOE safety goals comparison using NUREG-1150 PRA (probabilistic risk assessment) methodology  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A full-scope Level 3 probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) including external events has been performed for N Reactor, a US Department of Energy (DOE) Category A production reactor. This four-year, multi-million dollar task was a joint effort by Westinghouse Hanford Company, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). Technical lead in external events and NUREG-1150 methodology was provided by SNL. SAIC led the effort in the Level 1 analysis for the internally initiated events. Westinghouse Hanford supported the task in many key areas, such as data collection and interpretation, accident progression, system interaction, human factor analyses, expert elicitation, peers review, etc. The main objective of this Level 3 PRA are to assess the risks to the public and onsite workers posed by the operation of N Reactor, to identify modifications to the plant that could reduce the overall risk, and to compare those risks to the proposed DOE and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) quantitative safety goals. This paper presents the methodology adopted by Westinghouse Hanford and SNL for estimating individual health risks, and the comparison of the N Reactor results and DOE quantitative nuclear safety guidelines. This paper is devoted to DOE quantitative safety guidelines interpretation and comparison; the NRC safety objectives are also presented in order to compare N Reactor results to commercial nuclear power plants included in the NUREG-1150 study. 7 refs., 7 tabs.

Wang., O.S.; Zentner, M.D.; Rainey, T.E.

1990-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA In May 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a policy in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for decommissioning surplus DOE facilities consistent with the requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This policy ensures protection of the environment, worker health and public health, provides opportunities for stakeholder involvement, and achieves risk reduction without unnecessary delay. Consistent with the jointly issued "Guidance on Accelerating CERCLA Environmental Restoration at Federal Facilities" (August 22, 1994), this decommissioning policy encourages streamlined decision-making. This

244

DOE ORDER 5480.14, PHASE I - INSTALLATION ASSESSMENT FOR THE BETTIS ATOMIC POWER LABORATORY  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DOE ORDER 5480.14, PHASE I - INSTALLATION ASSESSMENT FOR THE BETTIS ATOMIC POWER LABORATORY Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy by Westinghouse Electric Corporation West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122-0079 i' Vendor Contract Number: DE-ACll-76PN00014 : IAELE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ............................................. 2. Introduction .................................................. a. Background......;.........................................i b. Authority .......................................................... : ; c. Purpose I ........................................................ 3 d Scope..................................................~..! e: Methodology...............................................! ........

245

Supplemental design requirements document enhanced radioactive and mixed waste storage: Phase 5, Project W-113  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Supplemental Design Requirements Document (SDRD) is used to communicate Project W-113 specific plant design information from Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) to the United States Department of Energy (DOE) and the cognizant Architect Engineer (A/E). The SDRD is prepared after the completion of the project Conceptual Design report (CDR) and prior to the initiation of definitive design. Information in the SDRD serves two purposes: to convey design requirements that are too detailed for inclusion in the Functional Design Criteria (FDC) report and to serve as a means of change control for design commitments in the Title I and Title II design. The Solid Waste Retrieval Project (W-113) SDRD has been restructured from the equipment based outline used in previous SDRDs to a functional systems outline. This was done to facilitate identification of deficiencies in the information provided in the initial draft SDRD and aid design confirmation. The format and content of this SDRD adhere as closely as practicable to the requirements of WHC-CM-6-1, Standard Engineering Practices for Functional Design Criteria.

Ocampo, V.P.

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

246

Promulgating Nuclear Safety Requirements  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Applies to all Nuclear Safety Requirements Adopted by the Department to Govern the Conduct of its Nuclear Activities. Cancels DOE P 410.1. Canceled by DOE N 251.85.

1996-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

247

Supplemental design requirements document enhanced radioactive and mixed waste storage Phase V Project W-112  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides additional and supplemental information to WHC-SD-W112-FDC-001, Project W-112 for radioactive and mixed waste storage. It provides additional requirements for the design and summarizes Westinghouse Hanford Company key design guidance and establishes the technical baseline agreements to be used for definitive design of the Project W-112 facilities.

Ocampo, V.P.; Boothe, G.F.; Greager, T.M.; Johnson, K.D.; Kooiker, S.L.; Martin, J.D.

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

248

Feed tank transfer requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document presents a definition of tank turnover; DOE responsibilities; TWRS DST permitting requirements; TWRS Authorization Basis (AB) requirements; TWRS AP Tank Farm operational requirements; unreviewed safety question (USQ) requirements; records and reporting requirements, and documentation which will require revision in support of transferring a DST in AP Tank Farm to a privatization contractor for use during Phase 1B.

Freeman-Pollard, J.R.

1998-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

249

DOE Challenge Home Recommended Quality Management Provisions...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Quality Management Provisions. qm6-14-13.pdf More Documents & Publications Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) DOE...

250

DOE Information Center  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Information Center DOE Information Center The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Center provides citizens a consolidated facility to obtain information and records related to the DOE's various programs in Oak Ridge and abroad. Employees at the DOE Information Center are available to assist with your requests and searches from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EST), Monday through Friday, except for federal holidays. Requests Documents can be requested in person or by telephone, email, or fax. Reproduction Please allow DOE Information Center staff adequate time to reproduce documents. Some material requires special handling, security reviews, etc. Delivery Unless special arrangements have been made with DOE Information Center staff, documents should be picked up during normal business hours.

251

DOE Explosives Safety Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Manual describes the Departments explosive safety requirements applicable to operations involving the development, testing, handling, and processing of explosives or assemblies containing explosives. Cancels DOE M 440.1-1. Canceled by DOE O 440.1B Chg 1.

2006-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

252

Analysis of a 4-inch small-break loss-of-coolant accident in a Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactor using TRAC-PF1/MOD1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the transient response of a Westinghouse 4- loop PWR using 17x17 fuel assemblies in a 14-ft. long reactor core to a 4-inch diameter SBLOCA with the computer code TRAC-PF1/MOD1, This is unique in that there are only two Westinghouse PWRs with 14-ft. cores (The... 4-inch SBLOCAs 65 XI. Comparison of RESAR-3S, TRAC and RELAP SBLOCAs . . 70 LIST OF ACRONYMS Acronym Name CCFL CVCS ECCS EPRI FSAR HPI INEL LB LOCA LOCA LPI MSIV NRC PCT PORV PWR RCP RCS RESAR RHR SI SBLOCA Argonne National...

Knippel, Kimberley I.R.

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

253

Supplemental design requirements document solid waste operations complex  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides additional and supplemental information to the WHC-SD-W112-FDC-001, WHC-SD-W113-FDC-001, and WHC-SD-W100-FDC-001. It provides additional requirements for the design and summarizes Westinghouse Hanford Company key design guidance and establishes the technical baseline agreements to be used for definitive design common to the Solid Waste Operations Complex (SWOC) Facilities (Project W-112, Project W-113, and WRAP 2A).

Ocampo, V.P.; Boothe, G.F.; Broz, D.R.; Eaton, H.E.; Greager, T.M.; Huckfeldt, R.A.; Kooiker, S.L.; Lamberd, D.L.; Lang, L.L.; Myers, J.B. [and others

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

ASCR Science Network Requirements  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ASCR Science Network Requirements Office of AdvancedScientific Computing Research, DOE Office of ScienceEnergy Sciences Network Gaithersburg, MD — April 15 and 16,

Dart, Eli

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

255

Transuranic Waste Requirements  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The guide provides criteria for determining if a waste is to be managed in accordance with DOE M 435.1-1, Chapter III, Transuranic Waste Requirements.

1999-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

256

DOE CORPORATE REPORTING  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7/23/2010 7/23/2010 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) CORPORATE REPORTING To ensure projects are effectively managed and delivering on the goals of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act), DOE will collect data on project management and execution, risk management, job creation, and key project milestones, in addition to what is required by Section 1512 of the Recovery Act. In most cases, monthly data will be used internally for managerial purposes only, but where DOE does intend to publicize monthly data, it will clearly indicate it to be "preliminary/informal and subject to change." Recipients are required to provide DOE information on, but not limited to, the following issues:

257

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Directives DOE Directives DOE Directives Directives are the Department of Energy's primary means to communicate and institutionalize directives and policies and to establish requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental elements and contractors. DOE O 413.3A - Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets DOE G 413.3-1 - Managing Design and Construction Using Systems Engineering for Use with DOE O 413.3A DOE G 413.3-2 - Quality Assurance Guide for Project Management DOE G 413.3-3 - Safeguards and Security for Program and Project Management DOE G 413.3-8 - Environmental Management (EM) Cleanup Projects DOE G 413.3-9 - U.S. Department of Energy Project Review Guide for Capital Asset Projects DOE G 413.3-10 - Earned Value Management System (EVMS)

258

DOE Order on Quality Assurance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The purpose of this order is to ensure that Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), products and services meet or exceed customers’ requirements and...

259

DOE Cooperative Research and Development Agreements  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes policy, requirements, and responsibilities for the oversight, management, and administration of Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) activities at DOE facilities. Cancels DOE O 483.1 Admin Chg 1 and DOE M 483.1-1.

2013-11-06T23:59:59.000Z

260

Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Corrosion and degradation of test materials in the Westinghouse 15 ton/day Coal Gasification Process Development Unit  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Two periods of in-plant exposures of candidate materials in the Westinghouse PDU have been completed. Coupons were exposed in the gasifier, hot-gas cyclone, quench scrubber, and gas cooler vessels. Corrosion monitoring of test materials is currently being conducted in the Westinghouse Coal Gasification Process Development Unit (PDU) coal gasification pilot plant. The corrosion data presented are from work during 1981 through 1984. During these two exposure periods, several coals ranging from lignites to bituminous coals and two petroleum cokes were gasified in the steam-oxygen mode. Fouling was observed on most corrosion racks. The effect of this process-related material was to promote corrosion. In the gasifier environment, alloys 6B, IN 671, and 18SR were the best performing alloys. Nickel-base alloys with Ni/Cr ratios >1.5, namely IN-617, IN-825, and alloy X, incurred severe corrosion attack in both exposures. Other alloys, although generally acceptable in corrosion performance, were not immune to solids-induced corrosion around coupon mounting holes. Several refractories such as Brickram 90, Harbison-Walker Ruby, and Chemal 85B showed little degradation in both gasifier exposures. Nitride bonded silicon carbon Refrax 20 had the greatest reduction in abrasion resistance as well as other properties. Single-phase structural ceramics including siliconized SiC, sintered ..cap alpha..-SiC, and Al/sub 2/O/sub 3/ did not suffer any noticeable damage. Materials evaluation in the hot-gas cyclone showed IN-671 and 26-1 to be more resistant than Type 310 and Type 310 aluminized. 18 refs., 23 figs., 24 tabs.

Yurkewycz, R.

1985-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

262

DECONTAMINATION AND BENEFICIAL REUSE OF DREDGED ESTUARINE SEDIMENT: THE WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA VITRIFICATION PROCESS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of the New York/New Jersey Harbor requires regular dredging. The offshore dumping facility has been closed and liquid effluents met discharge requirements. Pilot plant data were then used to prepare preliminary plant designs for a 76,000 cubic meter per year Demonstration Plant (100,000 yd3 /yr) and a 380,000 cubic meter

Brookhaven National Laboratory

263

Finding of No Significant Impact; Energy Efficient Performance Requirements for New Federal Commercial and Residential Buildings (DOE/EA-1463) (1/11/08)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 Federal Register 7 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Notices Energy; and provide comments and recommendations and priorities for the Department of Energy Annual Plan requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Subtitle J, Section 999. Tentative Agenda: 7:30 a.m.-8 a.m. Registration 8 a.m.-12 p.m. Welcome & Introductions, Opening Remarks by the Designated Federal Officer, Update Status of the 2007 Program, Overview of 2008 Annual Plan Draft, and Overview of the National Energy Technology Laboratory Complementary Research Program. 12 p.m.-1 p.m. Lunch. 1 p.m.-4 p.m. Committee Discussions. 4 p.m.-4:30 p.m. New Business: Plans for 2008-2010 Federal Advisory Committee. 4:30 p.m.-5 p.m. Public Comments. 5 p.m. Adjourn. Public Participation: The meeting is

264

DOE-STD-1077-94  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Training Accreditation Program Standard: Requirements and Guidelines Canceled | Supercedes DOE-STD-0101T, TAP-1, and DOE-STD-0103T, TAP-3 The purpose of this Standard is to provide requirements, information, and guidance for the effective implementation of the DOE Training Accreditation Program established by DOE Order 5480.18B, “Nuclear Facility Training Accreditation Program.”

265

DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements March 16, 2010 - 4:28pm Addthis DOE-initiated testing has revealed that a Samsung refrigerator (model RF26VAB), which the company had claimed was Energy Star compliant, consumed more energy than permitted by the Energy Star program. Test results for the Samsung model at issue show that, when tested in accordance with DOE's test procedure, it consumed between 7 and 11.4 percent more energy than the Energy Star requirement. Samsung is no longer manufacturing this model, although it may still be available from some retail outlets. Based on this testing, DOE is referring Samsung Model RF26VAB to the U.S.

266

DOE Online  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fermilab's Science Adventures! Fermilab's Science Adventures! DOE Online K-12 Instructional Resources ed.fnal.gov/doe/ The U.S. Department of Energy is committed to helping educate our nation's next generation of scientists. The following resources help teachers integrate the Internet into K-12 classroom instruction. DOE Labs General Instructional Units Online Resources Lesson Plans General References DOE Laboratory and Facility Education Home Pages (www-ed.fnal.gov/doe/doe_labs.html) Direct links for 27 education Websites at DOE national laboratories and facilities. Online Catalog (www-ed.fnal.gov/trc/library) Fermilab's Teacher Resource Center collection of 10,000+ PreK-12 instructional materials in science, mathematics and technology. Materials include tradebooks, curriculum materials, educational

267

General Responsibilities and Requirements  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The material presented in this guide provides suggestions and acceptable ways of implementing DOE M 435.1-1 and should not be viewed as additional or mandatory requirements. The objective of the guide is to ensure that responsible individuals understand what is necessary and acceptable for implementing the requirements of DOE M 435.1-1.

1999-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

268

Integrated Management Requirements mapping  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains five appendices documenting how Sandia implemented the DOE Conduct of Operations (5480.19) and DOE Quality Assurance (5700.6C) orders. It provides a mapping of the Sandia integrated requirements to the specific requirements of each Order and a mapping to Sandia`s approved program for implementing the Conduct of Operations Order.

Holmes, J.T.; Andrews, N.S.

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

Integrated Management Requirements mapping  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains five appendices documenting how Sandia implemented the DOE Conduct of Operations (5480.19) and DOE Quality Assurance (5700.6C) orders. It provides a mapping of the Sandia integrated requirements to the specific requirements of each Order and a mapping to Sandia's approved program for implementing the Conduct of Operations Order.

Holmes, J.T.; Andrews, N.S.

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Policy Technical Position NSEP-TP-2007- 1, Technical Position on the Requirement in DOE 0 420.1B to Use National Consensus Industry Standards and the Model Building CodesTechnical Position NS  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

All new construction required to follow the provisions of Department of Energy(DOE) Order 420. lB, Facility Safety, must comply with national consensus industrystandards and the model building...

271

DOE enforcement program roles and responsibilities: DOE handbook  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Price-Anderson Act provides indemnification to DOE contractors who manage and conduct nuclear activities in the DOE complex. The government acts as an insurer for these contractors against any findings of liability from the nuclear activities of the contractor within the scope of its contract. 10 CFR Part 820 establishes the legal framework for implementing DOE`s Nuclear Safety Enforcement Program. Integration with other DOE organizations and programs would assure that the enforcement process properly considers the actual or potential safety significance of a violation when determining an appropriate enforcement sanction. Achieving a proactive contractor compliance assurance rather than a heavy enforcement hand, will require a foundation of cooperation and teamwork across DOE organizations. This handbook identifies the areas of interface for the DOE Enforcement Program and provides guidance on roles and responsibilities for the key DOE organizational areas. It complements DOE-HDBK-1087-95 and 1089-95.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technical Training, Oral Examination Boards Phase III, Part 8 of 9  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Environment, Safety & Health U.S. Department of Energy DOE-HDBK-1122-99 ii This page intentionally left blank DOE-HDBK-1122-99 iii Course Developers William Egbert Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dave Lent Coleman Research Michael McNaughton Los Alamos National Laboratory Bobby Oliver Lockheed Martin Energy Systems Richard Cooke Argonne National Laboratory Brian Thomson Sandia National Laboratory Michael McGough Westinghouse Savannah River Company Brian Killand Fluor Daniel Hanford Corporation Course Reviewers Technical Standards Managers U.S. Department of Energy Peter O'Connell U.S. Department of Energy William D. Ulicny ATL International, Inc. DOE-HDBK-1122-99

273

DOE PAGES  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

a useful reference. Find out more Do you have questions about DOE PAGESBeta content, procedures, or policies? More information is available at OSTI's Public Access Policy page and...

274

DOE News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SMALL BUSINESS SYMPOSIUM TO LINK LOCAL COMPANIES WITH HANFORD CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at the Hanford...

275

DOE-STD-1030-96 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

for, Lockouts and Tagouts, Chapter IX of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities DOE-STD-1030-95, DOE Standard Guide...

276

Feed tank transfer requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document presents a definition of tank turnover. Also, DOE and PC responsibilities; TWRS DST permitting requirements; TWRS Authorization Basis (AB) requirements; TWRS AP Tank Farm operational requirements; unreviewed safety question (USQ) requirements are presented for two cases (i.e., tank modifications occurring before tank turnover and tank modification occurring after tank turnover). Finally, records and reporting requirements, and documentation which will require revision in support of transferring a DST in AP Tank Farm to a privatization contractor are presented.

Freeman-Pollard, J.R.

1998-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

277

Mandatory Supervisory Training Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mandatory Supervisory Training Requirements Mandatory Supervisory Training Requirements All DOE supervisors, managers, and executives will comply with mandatory supervisory training requirements (5 CFR 412; 5 CFR 315.801; 5 CFR 315.901; DOE O 360.1; and DOE O 320.1): * New supervisors: 80 hours of supervisory training, with 40 hours required to be completed during the supervisory probationary period. * Experienced supervisors: minimum of 8 hours of supervisory training each year. The Office of Learning and Workforce Development has developed an inventory of training and developmental activities that will meet the supervisory training requirements. The DOE courses Supervisory Essentials (32 hours) and Navigating the Federal Hiring Process (8 hours) are required to fulfill the first year 40-hour training

278

DOE Form  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

1991) PROJECT: U.S. Department of Energy Requirements Change Notice Baseline List of Required Compliance Documents CONTRACTOR: Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC...

279

DOE Form  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

11991) PROJECT: U.S. Department of Energy Requirements Change Notice Baseline List of Required Compliance Documents CONTRACTOR: Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC...

280

Drafts - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

O 452.2E Facility Safety Acquisition Career Management Program Nuclear Explosive and Weapon Surety Program Implementation Guide for Use in Developing Technical Safety...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Redelegation Procedures - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirement...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Redelegation Procedures by Website Administrator Text version available here. Delegation Procedures Re-Delegation Procedures Document Actions Redelegation Procedures Redelegating...

282

Delegation Procedures - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Delegation Procedures Text Delegation Procedures Delegation Template Text Redelegation Procedures Redelegation Template Delegation Procedures Redelegation Procedures...

283

NERSC/DOE HEP Requirements Workshop Presentations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Advanced Modeling for Particle Accelerators November 12, 2009 | Author(s): Lie-Quan Lee | Astrophysical Data Analysis November 12, 2009 | Author(s): Alex Szalay | Astrophysical...

284

Directives - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Analysis 300 Human Resources 400 Work Processes 500 Business and Support Services 1100 Org. Authorities, Functions and Internal Relationships 1200 External...

285

NERSC/DOE BER Requirements Workshop Agenda  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NERSC) 10:15 am - Break 10:30 pm - Case Studies: Climate Science (Lawrence Buja, David Randall, Co-leads) Noon - Working Lunch 1:00 pm - Case Studies: Climate Science, continued...

286

DPC list - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DPC list by Website Administrator PDF document icon DPC list 9-9-14.pdf - PDF document, 390 KB (399650 bytes...

287

Redelegation Template - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Redelegation Template by Website Administrator Microsoft Word Document icon Re-delegation Template Rev3 10-3-11 (1).doc - Microsoft Word Document, 39 KB (40448 bytes)...

288

Delegation Template - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Template by Website Administrator Microsoft Word Document icon delegationtemplate (1).doc - Microsoft Word Document, 39 KB (40448 bytes) Document Actions...

289

NERSC/DOE ASCR Requirements Workshop Presentations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

charge to committee January 5, 2011 | Author(s): Yukiko Sekine | Workshop outline, logistics, format January 5, 2011 | Author(s): Harvey Wasserman | ASCR Program Office Research...

290

NERSC/DOE BER Requirements Meeting Logistics  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Logistics Hotel Information Location The workshop was held at the Hilton Washington DCRockville Executive Meeting Center. Address is 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland,...

291

NERSC/DOE HEP Requirements Workshop Logistics  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Logistics Workshop Logistics Workshop Location Hilton Washington DCRockville Executive Meeting Center 1750 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD, 20852 The hotel is about 27 miles...

292

NERSC/DOE BER Requirements Workshop Presentations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

(high-low) Workshop GoalsOverview May 7, 2009 | Author(s): Yukiko Sekine | Workshop Logistics May 7, 2009 | Author(s): Harvey Wasserman | BER Overview May 7, 2009 | Author(s):...

293

NERSC/DOE BES Requirements Workshop Presentations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Workshop Goals February 9, 2010 | Author(s): Yukiko Sekine | Workshop outline, logistics, format, procedures February 9, 2010 | Author(s): Richard Gerber | BES Program...

294

Justification Memoranda - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirement...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Justification Memoranda by Diane Johnson Notice of Intent to Revise Department of Energy Order 350.1, Contractor Human Resources Management Program - by Robert Myers - last...

295

Email Alerts - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Email Alerts by Diane Johnson Use this form to subscribeunsubscribe to email alerts. Please select the type of email alert that you would like to receive. Your Name Please enter...

296

Updates - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Updates by Diane Johnson Email Alerts Subscribe to automatic e-mail notification about updates to the portal. Email Alerts...

297

References - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Regulations (DEAR) CFR Code of Federal Regulations CFR (annual edition) 10 CFR 430 10 CFR 830 10 CFR 835 10 CFR 850 10 CFR 851 Directives Review Board Directives Review Board...

298

NERSC/DOE HEP Requirements Review Participants  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

for ASCR Stefan Hoeche SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Particle physics phenomenology, in particular perturbative QCD and the construction of Monte Carlo event...

299

DOE Federal Register Questions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COMMENTS-PAGE 1 COMMENTS-PAGE 1 Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration On May 11, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Request for Information (RFI) (NBP RFI: Communications Requirements) seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in understanding the communications requirement of utilities, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the Smart Grid. The RFI also seeks to collect information about electricity infrastructure's current and projected communications requirements, as well as the types of networks and communications services that may be used for grid modernization, including specifically information on what types of communications capabilities utilities think that they will need and what type of communications capabilities the communications carriers think that they can

300

DOE-HDBK-1122-99; Radiological Control Technician Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Radiological Control Technician Training Technician Qualification Standard Coordinated and Conducted for Office of Environment, Safety & Health U.S. Department of Energy DOE-HDBK-1122-99 ii This page intentionally left blank. DOE-HDBK-1122-99 iii Course Developers Dave Lent Coleman Research Joe DeMers EG&G Mound Applied Technologies (formerly) Andy Hobbs FERMCO Dennis Maloney RUST - GJPO Richard Cooke Argonne National Laboratory Bobby Oliver Lockheed Martin Energy Systems Michael McNaughton Los Alamos National Laboratory Eva Lauber West Valley Nuclear Services Michael McGough Westinghouse Savannah River Corporation Brian Killand Fluor Daniel Hanford Corporation Course Reviewers Technical Standards Managers U.S. Department of Energy Peter O'Connell U.S. Department of Energy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

DOE-HDBK-1122-99; Radiological Control Technician Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Radiological Control Technician Training Fundamental Academic Training Study Guide Phase I Coordinated and Conducted for Office of Environment, Safety & Health U.S. Department of Energy DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technician Study Guide ii This page intentionally left blank. DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technician Study Guide iii Course Developers William Egbert Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dave Lent Coleman Research Michael McNaughton Los Alamos National Laboratory Bobby Oliver Lockheed Martin Energy Systems Richard Cooke Argonne National Laboratory Brian Thomson Sandia National Laboratory Michael McGough Westinghouse Savannah River Company Brian Killand Fluor Daniel Hanford Corporation Course Reviewers Technical Standards Managers U.S. Department of Energy

302

DOE-HDBK-1122-99; Radiological Control Technician Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 of 9 6 of 9 Radiological Control Technician Training Site Academic Training Study Guide Phase I Coordinated and Conducted for Office of Environment, Safety & Health U.S. Department of Energy DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technician Study Guide ii This page intentionally left blank. DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technician Study Guide iii Course Developers William Egbert Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dave Lent Coleman Research Michael McNaughton Los Alamos National Laboratory Bobby Oliver Lockheed Martin Energy Systems Richard Cooke Argonne National Laboratory Brian Thomson Sandia National Laboratory Michael McGough Westinghouse Savannah River Company Brian Killand Fluor Daniel Hanford Corporation Course Reviewers Technical Standards Managers U.S. Department of Energy

303

Comparison of risk-dominant scenario assumptions for several TRU waste facilities in the DOE complex  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In order to gain a risk management perspective, the DOE Rocky Flats Field Office (RFFO) initiated a survey of other DOE sites regarding risks from potential accidents associated with transuranic (TRU) storage and/or processing facilities. Recently-approved authorization basis documents at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) have been based on the DOE Standard 3011 risk assessment methodology with three qualitative estimates of frequency of occurrence and quantitative estimates of radiological consequences to the collocated worker and the public binned into three severity levels. Risk Class 1 and 2 events after application of controls to prevent or mitigate the accident are designated as risk-dominant scenarios. Accident Evaluation Guidelines for selection of Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs) are based on the frequency and consequence bin assignments to identify controls that can be credited to reduce risk to Risk Class 3 or 4, or that are credited for Risk Class 1 and 2 scenarios that cannot be further reduced. This methodology resulted in several risk-dominant scenarios for either the collocated worker or the public that warranted consideration on whether additional controls should be implemented. RFFO requested the survey because of these high estimates of risks that are primarily due to design characteristics of RFETS TRU waste facilities (i.e., Butler-type buildings without a ventilation and filtration system, and a relatively short distance to the Site boundary). Accident analysis methodologies and key assumptions are being compared for the DOE sites responding to the survey. This includes type of accidents that are risk dominant (e.g., drum explosion, material handling breach, fires, natural phenomena, external events, etc.), source term evaluation (e.g., radionuclide material-at-risk, chemical and physical form, damage ratio, airborne release fraction, respirable fraction, leakpath factors), dispersion analysis (e.g., meteorological assumptions, distance to receptors, plume meander, deposition, and other factors affecting the calculated {chi}/Q), dose assessments (specific activities, inhalation dose conversion factors, breathing rates), designated frequency of occurrence, and risk assignment per the DOE Standard 3011 methodology. Information from the sites is being recorded on a spreadsheet to facilitate comparisons. The first response from Westinghouse Safety Management Solutions for the Savannah River Site (SRS) also provided a detailed analysis of the major differences in methods and assumptions between RFETS and SRS, which forms much of the basis for this paper. Other sites responding to the survey include the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), Hanford, and the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL).

Foppe, T.L. [Foppe and Associates, Inc., Golden, CO (United States); Marx, D.R. [Westinghouse Safety Management Solutions, Inc., Aiken, SC (United States)

1999-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

304

DOE017-0153  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5525 5525 DOE017-0153 ,-.or/ N"( - ./,'-'S MaryBeth Zimmerman 02/14/2001 11:08AM / -- T ' ,44 L - ( _w _1_'- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .I f . J To: Kenneth Friedman/EE/DOE@DOE, Peggy Podolak/EE/DOE@DOE, Linda Silverman/EE/DOE@DOE, Ed Wall/EE/DOE@DOE, David RodgerslEE/DOE@DOE, Jerry DionlEE/DOE@DOE, Gail McKinley/EE/DOE@DOE. Lawrence MansuetifEE/DOE@DOE cc: John Sullivan/EE/DOE@DOE. Darrell Beschen/EEIDOE@DOE, Michael York/EE/DOE@DOE, Buddy GarlandlEEIDOE@DOE, Nancy Jefferv/EEIDOE@DOE, Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE. Sam Baldwin/EE/DOE@DOE, IEE-ADAS Subject: FW: NEP Draft outline Directions on NEP Assessment paper. Please read all of this very carefully before proceeding: Product Schedule: * Inputs due from sectors to Planning: COB on Thursday (sorry) o Due from EERE to Policy Office: noon on Friday

305

DOE PAGES  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

States Government purposes. (End of Notice) Ref. DEAR970.5227-2 Rights in data-technology transfer DOE-funded authors are free to publish in journals of their choice, including...

306

DOE Annual Site Environmental Reports (ASER)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

ASERs are required by DOE O 231.1B. The ASERs provide important information needed by site managers and DOE Headquarters to assess field environmental program performance, site-wide environmental monitoring and surveillance effectiveness, and confirm compliance with environmental standards and requirements. They are also the means by which DOE sites demonstrate compliance with the radiological protection requirements of DOE O 458.1. In addition, ASERs are an important means of conveying DOE's environmental protection performance to stakeholders and members of the public living near DOE sites.

307

DOE Approved Technical Standards | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Technical Standards Program » DOE DOE Technical Standards Program » DOE Approved Technical Standards DOE Approved Technical Standards Document ID Filter Document ID sort ascending Title Date DOE-STD-7501-99 The DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Programs Superseding DOE-STD-7501-95 Including Change Notice No. 1 (September 1997) This technical standard provides management expectations and a framework for the DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Program. The framework is intended to support development and implementation of a DOE-wide lessons learned infrastructure 01/20/2000 DOE-STD-6005-01 Industrial Hygiene Practices This standard recommends industrial hygiene practices to support components of the Worker Protection Program required by Department of Energy (DOE) Order 440.1A, “Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees. 04/30/2001

308

Supplemental design requirements document, Project W026. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document supplements and extends the Functional Design Criteria, SP-W026-FDC-001, for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility (WRAP), Module 1. It provides additional detailed requirements, summarizes key Westinghouse Hanford Company design guidance, and establishes baseline technical agreements to be used in definitive design of the WRAP-1 facility. Revision 3 of the Supplemental Design Requirements Document has been assigned an Impact Level of 3ESQ based on the content of the entire revision. The actual changes made from Revision 2 have an Impact Level of 3S and the basis for these changes was previously reviewed and approved per WHC correspondence No. 9355770.

Weidert, J.R.

1993-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

309

DOE-STD-3006-2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Planning and Conducting Readiness Reviews Superseding DOE-STD-3006-2000 (June 2000) This Standard provides standardized methods and approaches for planning and conducting RRs. This Standard also provides guidance for preparation of exemption requests in accordance with DOE O 251.1C. DOE O 425.1D requirements for RRs apply both to responsible contractors and to DOE

310

DOE Cooperative Research and Development Agreements Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Manual provides detailed requirements to supplement DOE O 483.1, DOE Cooperative Research and Development Agreements, dated 1-12-01, which establishes requirements for the performance of technology transfer through the use of Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs). Canceled by DOE O 483.1A.

2001-01-12T23:59:59.000Z

311

Regulators, Requirements, Statutes  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Regulators, Requirements, Statutes Regulators, Requirements, Statutes Regulators, Requirements, Statutes The Laboratory must comply with environmental laws and regulations that apply to Laboratory operations. Contact Environmental Communication & Public Involvement P.O. Box 1663 MS M996 Los Alamos, NM 87545 (505) 667-0216 Email Environmental laws and regulations LANL complies with more than 30 state and federal regulations and policies designed to protect human health and the environment. Regulators Regulators Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) EPA Homepage EPA - Region VI U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DOE Homepage DOE Environmental Policy DOE Citizen's Advisory Board U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Southwest Region 2 New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) NMED Homepage NMED DOE Oversight Office

312

Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To define the program for the management of cost-effective maintenance of Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities. Guidance for compliance with this Order is contained in DOE G 433.1-1, Nuclear Facility Maintenance Management Program Guide for use with DOE O 433.1, which references Federal regulations, DOE directives, and industry best practices using a graded approach to clarify requirements and guidance for maintaining DOE-owned Government property. (Cancels DOE 4330.4B, Chapter II, Maintenance Management Program, dated 2-10-94.) Cancels DOE 4330.4B (in part). Canceled by DOE O 433.1A.

2001-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

Microsoft Word - Directives Requiring Additional Documentation...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Chg 2 Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment 24 DOE O 5480.19, Chg 2 Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities 25 DOE O 5480.20A, Chg 1 Personnel...

314

Technical Safety Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Requirements Safety Requirements FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: Contractor has developed, maintained, and received DOE Field Office Approval for the necessary operating conditions of a facility. The facility has also maintained an inventory of safety class and safety significant systems and components. REQUIREMENTS: ï‚· 10 CFR 830.205, Nuclear Safety Rule. ï‚· DOE-STD-3009-2002, Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses. ï‚· DOE-STD-1186-2004, Specific Administrative Controls. Guidance: ï‚· DOE G 423.1-1, Implementation Guide for Use in Developing Technical Safety Requirements. ï‚· NSTP 2003-1, Use of Administrative Controls for Specific Safety Functions. Performance Objective 1: Contractor Program Documentation

315

Goals and Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Sustainability Performance Office (SPO) is committed to meeting the goals of Executive Order (E.O.) 13514, E.O. 13423, and related statutory requirements through the Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan (SSPP).

316

DOE HANDBOOK  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Handbook on Overseas Assignments Handbook on Overseas Assignments United States Department of Energy Office of Human Capital Management July 2013 2 Introduction This handbook covers all types of Federal employment overseas, including details, both within DOE as well as to other agencies; transfers to approved international organizations; assignments to permanent DOE positions; cost-free experts; and personal services agreements (PSAs). This handbook contains information, guidance, sample service agreements, and related documentation that are to be used to implement the following directives: a. Executive Order 11552, Providing for Details and Transfers of Federal Employees to International Organizations at http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/11552.html;

317

DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technical Training, Practical Training Phase II, Part 7 of 9  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Radiological Control Technician Training Radiological Control Technician Training Practical Training Phase II Part 7 of 9 Coordinated and Conducted for Office of Environment, Safety & Health U.S. Department of Energy DOE-HDBK-1122-99 ii This page intentionally left blank. DOE-HDBK-1122-99 iii Course Developers William Egbert Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dave Lent Coleman Research Michael McNaughton Los Alamos National Laboratory Bobby Oliver Lockheed Martin Energy Systems Richard Cooke Argonne National Laboratory Brian Thomson Sandia National Laboratory Michael McGough Westinghouse Savannah River Company Brian Killand Fluor Daniel Hanford Corporation Course Reviewers Technical Standards Managers U.S. Department of Energy

318

DOE-STD-1031-92 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

direction for, Communications, Chapter IV of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. The practices in this guide should...

319

DOE-STD-1042-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for, "Control Area Activities," Chapter III of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities."Control Area Activities" is an...

320

DOE-STD-1037-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chemistry and Unique Processes, Chapter XIII of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. The practices in this guide should...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

DOE-STD-1041-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and Operating Practices," Chapter II of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. "Shift Routines and Operating...

322

DOE Challenge Home Policy Record, November 8, 2013 | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Home website. chpolicyrecord11082013.pdf More Documents & Publications Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) DOE...

323

DOE Standards Actions, January 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Documents Recently Published Documents Recently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: • DOE-STD-1032-92, Guide to Good Practices for Operations Or- ganization and Administration, December 1992, Change No- tice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1033-92, Guide to Good Practices for Operations and Administration Updates Through Required Reading, December 1992, Change No- tice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1034-93, Guide to Good Practices for Timely Or- ders to Operators, March 1993, Change Notice No. 1, Decem- ber 1998. • DOE-STD-1035-93, Guide to Good Practices for Logkeeping, March 1993, Change Notice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1036-93, Guide to Good Practices for Independent Verification, June 1993, Change Notice No. 1, December 1998. • DOE-STD-1038-93, Guide to Good Practices for Operations Turn-

324

DOE Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

325

DOE Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

772 772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

326

Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees Guide for use with DOE O 440.1  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This implementation guide provides general information and methodologies that DOE finds acceptable in meeting the Department's requirements defined in DOE O 440.1.

1997-07-10T23:59:59.000Z

327

DOE-STD-1172-2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Safety Software Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard This SSQA FAQS identifies the minimum technical competency requirements for DOE personnel who have a responsibility for safety software. Although there may be other competency requirements associated with the positions held by DOE personnel, this technical FAQS is limited to identifying the specific technical competencies required throughout all defense nuclear facilities.

328

DOE-HDBK-1092-98; DOE Handbook Electrical Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

092-98 092-98 January 1998 DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE98001290 DOE-HDBK-1092-98 DOE-HDBK-1092-98 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 3.0 ELECTRICAL PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 4.0 GROUNDING 5.0 SPECIAL OCCUPANCIES 6.0 REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT

329

DOE Hydrogen Program Overview  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Fuel Cells and Fuel Cells Mark Paster U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Program January, 2005 A Bold New Approach is Required 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Petroleum (MMB/Day Oil Equivalent) Actual Projection U.S. Oil Production EIA 2003 Base Case Extended Oil Consumption With Average Fuel Efficiency Automobile & Light Truck Oil Use U.S. Transportation Oil Consumption U.S. Refinery Capacity Source: DOE/EIA, International Petroleum Statistics Reports, April 1999; DOE/EIA 0520, International Energy Annual 1997, DOE/EIA0219(97), February 1999. 0 20 40 60 80 100 Rest of World OPEC US Percentage of Total Consumption Production Reserves 2% 12% 26% 7% 41% 77% 67% 47% 21% World Oil Reserves are Consolidating in OPEC Nations 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

330

Order Module--DOE O 433.1B, MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

33.1B, MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE 33.1B, MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES Order Module--DOE O 433.1B, MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES "The familiar level of this module is designed to summarize the basic information in DOE O 433.1B, Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities. This Order canceled DOE O 433.1A. This module is divided into three sections. Section one contains the objective, general requirements, and the responsibilities assigned to field element managers. Section two includes the requirements in attachment 2 of the Order, Maintenance Management Program Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities. Section three is a summary of the guidance provided in DOE G 433.1-1, Facility Maintenance Management Program Guide for Use with DOE O 433.1.The

331

Analysis of a natural circulation cooldown transients in a Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactor using TRAC-PF1/MOD1 and TRAC-PF1/MOD2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Circulation Cooldown Transient in a Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactor Using TRAC-PF1/MOD1 and TRAC-PF1/MOD2. (December 1988) Evelyn Marie Breiner, B. S. , Texas AgtM University Chair of Advisory Committee; Dr. B. Nassersharif To perform transient.... 22). The four-loop model differs from the two-loop 35 TABLE 5 Component Actuation Timing Component Action Transient Time (s) 4-Loo Mod 1 Transient Time (s) 2-Loo M 1 4" break occurs CVCS initiation Low pressurizer pressure trip Reactor trip...

Breiner, Evelyn Marie

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

332

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE STD 1063, Facility Representatives  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

63-2011 63-2011 FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES DOE-STD-1063-2011 Familiar Level August 2011 1 DOE-STD-1063-2011 FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What are the purpose and scope of DOE-STD-1063-2011? 2. What are the definitions of the terms listed in section 3 of DOE-STD-1063-2011? 3. What are the duties, responsibilities, and authorities of facility representatives (FRs) and other key personnel? 4. What are the requirements of the FR program? 5. What are the Department of Energy (DOE)-wide FR performance indicators (PIs)? 6. How are DOE-wide FR PIs calculated? 7. What are the FR program objectives that should be measured by an FR program

333

DOE Cooperative Research and Development Agreements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

To establish Department of Energy (DOE) policy, requirements, and responsibilities for the oversight, management, and administration of Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)...

334

CRAD, Feedback and Continuous Improvement - DOE Headquarters...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

2, quality assurance requirements (as stated in 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 830, Subpart A, DOE Order 414.1 C, Quality Assurance, or other applicable...

335

DOE-STD-1038-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for, Operations Turnover, Chapter XII of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1038-93, Guide to Good...

336

DOE-STD-1034-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for, Timely Orders to Operators, Chapter XV of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1034-93, Guide to Good...

337

DOE-STD-1044-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and Piping Labeling," Chapter XVIII of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1044-93 CN-1, Guide to Good...

338

DOE-STD-1039-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of Equipment and System Status, Chapter VIII of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1039-93, Guide to Good...

339

DOE-STD-1032-92 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Organization and Administration, Chapter I of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1032-92 Change Notice 1,...

340

DOE-STD-1043-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for, Operator Aid Postings, Chapter XVII of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1043-93 CN-1, Guide to Good...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

DOE-STD-1035-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

direction for, Logkeeping, Chapter XI of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. DOE-STD-1035-93, Guide to Good...

342

Introduction to DOE Order 435.1 Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Introduction to DOE Order 435.1 Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Requirements Introduction to DOE Order 435.1 Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Requirements Christine...

343

DOE O 483.1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 01-12-01 Sunset Review: 01-12-03 Expiration: 01-12-05 SUBJECT: DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS 1. OBJECTIVES. a. To establish Department of Energy (DOE) policy, requirements, and responsibilities for the oversight, management, and administration of Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) activities at DOE facilities. b. Through the use of CRADAs, consistent with the terms of the facility contract or delegation of authority, DOE and its facilities will- (1) facilitate the efficient and expeditious development, transfer, and exploitation of Federally owned or originated technology to non-DOE entities for the public benefit and to enhance the accomplishment of DOE missions;

344

DOE F 4600.2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FEDERAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REPORTING CHECKLIST U.S. Department of Energy For instructions see FAL Management of Report Deliverables DOE F 4600.2 (10/01) All Other Editions are Obsolete 1. Identification Number: 2. Program/Project Title: 3. Recipient: 4. Reporting Requirements: Frequency No. of Copies Addressees MANAGEMENT REPORTING Progress Report Special Status Report (see Special Instructions) SCIENTIFIC/TECHNICAL REPORTING (Reports/Products must be submitted with appropriate DOE F 241. The 241 forms are available at .) www.osti.gov/elink Report/Product Form Final Scientific/Technical Report Conference papers/proceedings* Software/Manual Other (see special instructions) * Scientific and technical conferences only DOE F 241.3 DOE F 241.3 DOE F 241.4 DOE F 241.3 FINANCIAL REPORTING CLOSEOUT REPORTING OTHER REPORTING SF-269, Financial Status Report SF- 269A, Financial

345

Probabilistic analysis and operational data in response to NUREG-0737, Item II. K. 3. 2 for Westinghouse NSSS plants. [Modifications to reduce LOCA due to stuck-open power-operated relief valve  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes various modifications to Westinghouse plants since TMI and, using probabilistic analysis via event trees, estimates the effect of the post-TMI changes, including an automatic (PORV) (power operated relief valve) isolation concept identified in NUREG-0731 item II.K.3.1. The requested safety valve operational data is included as an appendix. A significant reduction in the frequency of a small break LOCA, due to a stuck open PORV has already been achieved by the modifications made subsequent to TMI. Domestic Westinghouse operating plant data (based on 181 reactor years of operation) has been collected and evaluated. An auto block valve closure system has been evaluated. The analysis is generally applicable to all Westinghouse plants which have incorporated the post-TMI hardware and procedural changes relative to stuck-open PORVs.

Wood, D.C.; Gottshall, C.L.

1981-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance on the conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCSs), also referred to as non-Government standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government

347

DOE Makes Available $8 Million for Pre-Conceptual Design of Next Generation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Makes Available $8 Million for Pre-Conceptual Design of Next Makes Available $8 Million for Pre-Conceptual Design of Next Generation Nuclear Plants DOE Makes Available $8 Million for Pre-Conceptual Design of Next Generation Nuclear Plants September 28, 2006 - 9:01am Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that DOE's Idaho National Laboratory (INL) will make awards valued at about $8 million to three companies to perform engineering studies and develop a pre-conceptual design to guide research on the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP). The INL will issue a contract later this week to Westinghouse Electric Company for the pre-conceptual design of the NGNP, and will later issue contracts to AREVA NP and General Atomics to perform complimentary engineering studies in the areas of technology and design

348

DOE-STD-1168-2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Confinement Ventilation and Process Gas Treatment Functional Area Qualification Standard The Confinement Ventilation and Process Gas Treatment Functional Area Qualification Standard establishes common functional area competency requirements for all DOE CV&PGT personnel who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

349

DOE-STD-1183-2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Nuclear Safety Specialist Functional Area Qualification Standard Replaced by DOE-STD-1183-2007 The Nuclear Safety Specialist Functional Area Qualification Standard establishes common functional area competency requirements for Department of Energy personnel who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

350

DOE-STD-1027-92  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports Change Notice No. 1 (September 1997) The purpose of this DOE Standard is to establish guidance for the preparation and review of hazard categorization and accident analyses techniques as required in DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports.

351

DOE-STD-1183-2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Nuclear Safety Specialist Functional Area Qualification Standard The Nuclear Safety Specialist FAQS establishes common functional area competency requirements for all DOE nuclear safety specialist personnel who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

352

DOE-STD-1174-2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Radiation Protection Functional Area Qualification Standard The Radiation Protection Functional Area Qualification Standard (FAQS) establishes common functional area competency requirements for all DOE Radiation Protection personnel who provide assistance, or direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

353

DOE-STD-1173-2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Criticality Safety Functional Areq Qualification Standard The Criticality Safety FAQS establishes common functional area competency requirements for DOE criticality safety personnel who provide assistance, or direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s nuclear facilities.

354

DOE-STD-1173-2003  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Criticality Safety Functional Areq Qualification Standard Replaced by DOE-STD-1173-2009 The Criticality Safety Functional Area Qualification Standard establishes common functional area competency requirements for Department of Energy criticality safety personnel who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

355

DOE-STD-1185-2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Functional Area Qualification Standard Replaced by DOE-STD-1185-2007 The Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Functional Area Qualification Standard establishes common functional area competency requirements for Department of Energy personnel who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

356

DOE-STD-1160-2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Occupational Safety Functional Area Qualification Standard The Occupational Safety technical functional area qualification standard (FAQS) establishes common functional area competency requirements for all DOE occupational safety personnel who provide assistance, or direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

357

DOE-STD-1175-2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Senior Technical Safety Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard The STSM FAQS establishes common functional area competency requirements for all DOE STSMs who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

358

DOE-STD-1146-2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

General Technical Base Qualification Standard The General Technical Base Qualification Standard establishes common technical competency requirements for all DOE personnel who provide assistance in, direction or guidance to, or oversight or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

359

DOE-STD-1170-2003  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Electrical Systems Functional Area Qualification Standard Replaced by DOE-STD-1170-2007 The Electrical Systems Functional Area Qualification Standard establishes common functional area competency requirements for Department of Energy personnel who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

360

DOE Onboarding  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

One-Year Passport to Success One-Year Passport to Success What is On-boarding? Orientation On-boarding ï‚— Transactional focus and goals ï‚— Less than one week ï‚— Executed by HR Office ï‚— Address new employee needs ï‚— Completed paperwork ï‚— Strategic focus and goals ï‚— Starts before first day through first year ï‚— Supervisor & Senior Leadership involvement ï‚— Integrate multiple offices, functions and individuals ï‚— Address employee needs ï‚— Maximizes employee engagement and retention 2 On-boarding Program Goals 3 ï‚— Build and sustain high-performance culture by accelerating time for new employee to become productive ï‚— Create learning opportunities that allow new employees to successfully integrate into their new DOE organization ï‚— Provide employees with the tools and resources to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

DOE 11  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE A ward N o.: D E--NT0005665 Final T echnical R eport (October 2 008 - S eptember 2 012) Source c haracterization a nd t emporal variation o f m ethane s eepage f rom thermokarst l akes o n t he A laska N orth S lope in r esponse t o A rctic c limate c hange Submitted b y: University o f A laska Fairbanks, A K 9 9775 Prepared for: United S tates D epartment o f E nergy National E nergy T echnology L aboratory May 29 th 2013 Office of Fossil Energy 2 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any

362

DOE Pulse  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

go! go! home about archives subscribe Profile Dr. Isaac Gamwo (left) works with Dr. Ward Burgess (right) at the National Energy Technology Laboratory. Photo Credit: NETL. The practical application of an elite researcher's life: Isaac K. Gamwo For a man whose expertise includes reactive multiphase fluid dynamics, complex fluid properties, and chemical looping combustion processes, Dr. Isaac Gamwo is surprisingly easy to comprehend. "The research we do in this lab is not confined to the world of academia," he notes, "it has tangible impacts on the way we produce energy." As senior research chemical engineer at DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Dr. Gamwo is currently focused on complex fluid properties at high temperatures and pressures. His recent work includes

363

DOE Code:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

we1rbox installatiOn we1rbox installatiOn ____:....;...=.~;;....:..;=-+- DOE Code: - - !- Project Lead: Wes R1esland NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY J 3-24-10 1 Date: Project Information 1. Project Overview What are tne enwonmental mpacts? Contractor~~ _ _ _ _ ] 11 The purpose of this project is to prepare a pad for a 90 ton crane to get 1nto positiOn and ng up so we can 1 set our new weir box into position We will widen the existing road around 20 feet at the north end and taper our fill to about5 feet at the south end for a total of about 200 feeL and budd a near level pad for them tong up the crane on We will use the d1rt from the hill irnrnedJateiy north of the work to oe done 2. 3 4 What*s the legal location? What IS the durabon of the prOJed?

364

DOE F  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

420.2 420.2 All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Burden Disclosure Statement Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Records Management Division, IM-11 GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20585; and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), Washington, DC 20503. U.S. Department of Energy Personal Property Loan Agreement DOE-PMR 109-1.5103 1. CONTROL

365

Active DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Active DOE Technical Standards Active DOE Technical Standards Document Number Document Title Responsible SLM DOE-HDBK-1001-96 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 DOE-HDBK-1003-96 DOE-HDBK-1010-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/4-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1015/1-93

366

Re: DOE Request for Information - Implementing the National Broadband...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

or "DOE") regarding the current and future communications requirements of utilities, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the Smart Grid, in an effort to...

367

Re: DOE Request for Information - Implementing the National Broadband...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

or "DOE") regarding the current and future communications requirements of utilities, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the Smart Grid in an effort to...

368

DOE M 483.1-1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Approved: 1-12-01 Approved: 1-12-01 Sunset Review: 1-12-03 Expiration: 1-12-05 DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS MANUAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Science and Technology Policy Analysis DISTRIBUTION: INITIATED BY: All Departmental Elements Office of Science and Technology Policy Analysis DOE M 483.1-1 DOE M 483.1-1 i (and ii) 1-12-01 DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS MANUAL 1. PURPOSE. This Manual provides detailed requirements to supplement DOE O 483.1, DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, dated 1- 12-01, which establishes requirements for the performance of technology transfer through the use of Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs). 2. REFERENCE. DOE O 483.1, DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND

369

DOE N 203.1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

All Departmental Elements Office of the Chief Information Officer DOE N 203.1 U.S. Department of Energy NOTICE Washington, D.C. Approved: 10-02-00 Expires: 06-02-01 SUBJECT: SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE 1. OBJECTIVES. To define requirements and responsibilities for software quality assurance (SQA) within the Department of Energy (DOE) to ensure that- a. all software owned or maintained by DOE, as referenced in paragraph 3c, Applicability, is subjected to formal quality assurance; b. all DOE software engineering follows identified standards and best practices throughout the project and product lifecycle; c. due to the spectrum of requirements, the degree of SQA is risk-based; and d. personnel are capable of correctly developing, using, and managing software.

370

DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technical Training, Facility Practical Training Attachment Phase IV, Part 9 0f 9  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Radiological Control Technician Training Facility Practical Training Attachment Phase IV Coordinated and Conducted for Office of Environment, Safety & Health U.S. Department of Energy DOE-HDBK-1122-99 ii This page intentionally left blank DOE-HDBK-1122-99 iii Course Developers William Egbert Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dave Lent Coleman Research Michael McNaughton Los Alamos National Laboratory Bobby Oliver Lockheed Martin Energy Systems Richard Cooke Argonne National Laboratory Brian Thomson Sandia National Laboratory Michael McGough Westinghouse Savannah River Company Brian Killand Fluor Daniel Hanford Corporation Course Reviewers Technical Standards Managers U.S. Department of Energy

371

DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2005  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Chemical Management Replaced by DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2008 This chapter identifies and consolidates existing user safety and health requirements found in DOE and Federal chemical-related safety and health regulations and National Standards that address hazard analysis of activities involving chemicals (see definition) and chemical products (see definition). State and local codes and requirements are NOT included.

372

DOE-HDBK-6004-99  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Supplementary Guidance and Design Experience for the Fusion Safety Standards DOE-STD-6002-96 and DOE-STD-6003-96 The first of these standards identifies requirements that subscribers to that standard must meet to achieve safety in fusion facilities. The second standard contains guidance to assist in meeting the requirements identified in the first.

373

DOE-STD-1022-94  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Natural Phenomena Hazards Characterization Criteria Replaced by DOE-STD-1020-2012 | Change Notice No. 1 (January 1996) | Reaffirmed with Errata (April 2002) The Department of Energy (DOE) has established policy and requirements for natural phenomena hazard (NPH) mitigation for DOE sites and facilities using a graded approach as specified by DOE O 420.1, “Facility Safety” and associated NPH Guide G 420.1-2.

374

DOE CONTRACTOR PENSION PLANS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-13 1-13 For use in M&O and non-M&O cost reimbursement solicitations and contracts where work had been previously performed under a DOE M&O contract and the successor Contractor is (a) required to employ all or part of the former Contractor's workforce and sponsors the employee pension and benefit plans; or (b) retains sponsorship of benefit plans that survive performance of the contract work scope. Contracts in this latter category include, but are not limited to, environmental remediation, infrastructure services and other site-specific project completion contracts. DOE-H-1002 EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION: PAY AND BENEFITS (a) Contractor Employee Compensation Plan The Contractor shall submit, for Contracting Officer approval, by (fill-in

375

Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order defines the safety management program required by 10 CFR 830.204(b)(5) for maintenance and the reliable performance of Structures, Systems and Components (SSCs) that are part of the safety basis required by 10 CFR 830.202.1 at hazard category 1, 2 and 3 Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities. Cancels DOE O 433.1. Canceled by DOE O 433.1B.

2007-02-13T23:59:59.000Z

376

Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order defines the safety management program required by 10 CFR 830.204(b)(5) for maintenance and the reliable performance of structures, systems and components that are part of the safety basis required by 10 CFR 830.202 at hazard category 1, 2 and 3 DOE nuclear facilities. Cancels DOE O 433.1A. Admin Chg 1, dated 3-12-2013, cancels DOE O 433.1B.

2010-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

377

DOE Names Interim Manager for Idaho Operations Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1990 with more than 16 years of experience at the Westinghouse Electric Corporation's Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania. At Bettis, he held a variety of...

378

DOE Order 440. 1 B: Worker Protection Program for DOE (Including NNSA)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0. 1 B: Worker Protection Program for DOE (Including 0. 1 B: Worker Protection Program for DOE (Including NNSA) Federal Employees DOE Order 440. 1 B: Worker Protection Program for DOE (Including NNSA) Federal Employees Stakeholders: DOE and NNSA employees Scope: DOE Order 440.1 B establishes the framework for an effective worker protection program that will reduce or prevent injuries, illnesses, and accidental losses by providing Department of Energy, including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Federal workers with a safe and healthful workplace. Summary: Among the requirements of DOE Order 440.1 B, the Department must provide its employees, including NNSA, a number of protections relating to whistle blowing guidelines. The relevant section of requirements includes: 4. REQUIREMENTS. DOE elements must:

379

E-Print Network 3.0 - accelerator facilities doe Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

JUSTIFICATION MEMO ON REVISION OF DOE O Summary: ON REVISION OF DOE O 5480.19, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS FOR DOE FACILITIES Executive Summary... will be applicable to DOE...

380

Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING NNSA) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING NNSA) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES The familiar level of this module is divided into two sections. In the first section, we will discuss the objective, requirements, and the responsibilities assigned to the heads of field elements. In the second section, we will discuss the content of attachment 1, Functional Area Requirements. We have provided examples and a practice to help familiarize you with the material. The practice will also help prepare you for the criterion test. DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 440.1B, Worker Protection Management for DOE (Including the National Nuclear Security Administration) Federal

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

DOE Technical Assistance Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii Collection of Customer Data for Better Buildings Guidelines For Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utility Keith Freischlag and Curtis Framel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project DOE Technical Assistance Program Team 4 - Program & Project Development & Implementation December 16, 2010 Guidelines for Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities Webinar Overview * Technical Assistance Program (TAP) * Discussion of Identifying Utility Stakeholders * Discussion of Procuring Customer Usage Data * Suggestions to Streamline Data Collection Processes * Overview of Data Reporting Requirements * Q&A Guidelines for Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities * Questions and discussion after presentation

382

DOE F 1325  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

The Department's Implementation The Department's Implementation of the "Energy Annex, Emergency Support Function 12" to the National Response Framework DOE/IG-0847 January 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 January 31, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report on The Department's Implementation of the "Energy Annex, Emergency Support Function 12" to the National Response Framework BACKGROUND As required by the National Response Framework (NRF), the Department of Energy, in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), plays an active role in responding to national-level disasters and emergencies. As described in the "Energy Annex,

383

DOE Order on Quality Assurance  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INITIATED BY: INITIATED BY: www.directives.doe.gov Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 4-25-2011 SUBJECT: QUALITY ASSURANCE 1. PURPOSE. a. To ensure that Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), products and services meet or exceed customers' requirements and expectations. b. To achieve quality for all work based upon the following principles: (1) All work, as defined in this Order, is conducted through an integrated and effective management system; (2) Management support for planning, organization, resources, direction, and control is essential to quality assurance (QA); (3) Performance and quality improvement require thorough, rigorous

384

DOE FOIA Request Form  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Administration FOIA Request Form Administration FOIA Request Form To make an Electronic FOIA (E-FOIA) request, please provide the information below. Failure to enter accurate and complete information may render your FOIA request impossible to fulfill. * Requests submitted under the Privacy Act must be signed and, therefore, cannot be submitted on this form. Name: (Required) Organization: Address: (Required) Phone: FAX: Email: Reasonably Describe Records Describe the specific record (s) you seek with sufficient detail that a knowledgeable official of the activity may locate the record with a reasonable amount of effort. Such detail should include: dates, titles, file designations, and offices to be searched. Since most DOE records are not retained permanently, the more information that you provide, the better the opportunity there is to determine if the

385

Development Requirements for Advanced Industrial Heat Pumps  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DOE is attempting to advance the use of heat pumps to save energy in industrial processes. The approach has emphasized developing better heat pump technology and transferring that technology to the private sector. DOE requires that heat pump...

Chappell, R. N.; Priebe, S. J.; Bliem, C. J.; Mills, J. I.

386

SEISMIC DESIGN EVALUATION GUIDELINES FOR BURIED PIPING FOR THE DOE HLW FACILITIES'  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

6 1 6 1 7 1 1 SEISMIC DESIGN EVALUATION GUIDELINES FOR BURIED PIPING FOR THE DOE HLW FACILITIES' Chi-Wen Lin Consultant, Martinez, CA George Antaki Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC Kamal Bandyopadhyay Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY ABSTRACT This paper presents the seismic design and evaluation guidelines for underground piping for the Department of Energy (DOE) High-Level-Waste (HLW) Facilities. The underground piping includes both single and double containment steel pipes and concrete pipes with steel lining, with particular emphasis on the double containment piping. The design and evaluation guidelines presented in this paper follow the generally accepted beam-on-elastic- foundation analysis principle and the inertial response calculation method, respectively, for piping directly

387

DOE-HDBK-1122-99; Radiological Control Technician Training, Part 5 of 9  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 of 9 5 of 9 Radiological Control Technician Training Site Academic Training Instructor's Guide Phase I Coordinated and Conducted for Office of Environment, Safety & Health U.S. Department of Energy DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technician Instructor's Guide ii This page intentionally left blank. DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technician Instructor's Guide iii Course Developers William Egbert Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dave Lent Coleman Research Michael McNaughton Los Alamos National Laboratory Bobby Oliver Lockheed Martin Energy Systems Richard Cooke Argonne National Laboratory Brian Thomson Sandia National Laboratory Michael McGough Westinghouse Savannah River Company Brian Killand Fluor Daniel Hanford Corporation Course Reviewers Technical Standards Managers

388

Competition Requirements  

Energy Savers [EERE]

* Policy Flash 2008-39, "Contract Change Order Administration of Department of Energy (DOE) Prime Contracts" * Acquisition Guide 15.4-1, "Pricing Contract Modifications" Overview...

389

Order Module--DOE STD-1098-2008, DOE STANDARD: RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

STD-1098-2008, DOE STANDARD: RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL STD-1098-2008, DOE STANDARD: RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL Order Module--DOE STD-1098-2008, DOE STANDARD: RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL "The radiological control program discussed in DOE-STD-1098-2008 goes beyond the scope of, and includes more details than, the documented radiation protection program (RPP) required by 10 CFR 835, -Occupational Radiation Protection.‖ To ensure implementation of a comprehensive and coherent radiological control program that exceeds basic requirements and provides a substantial safety margin, DOE encourages its contractors to implement the provisions of DOE-STD-1098- 2008 to the extent appropriate to facility hazards and operations, consistent with DOE's integrated safety management program. Should any conflicts arise between the site-specific radiological control manual and the documented RPP, the

390

Microsoft Word - DOE-ID-14-016 Arizona State EC B3-6.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

or permit requirements for environmental, safety, and health, including requirements of DOE orders; 2) require siting and construction or major expansion of waste storage,...

391

DOE-STD-3006-95  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Planning and Conduct of Operation Readiness Reviews Replaced by DOE-STD-3006-2000 DOE 0 425.1 specifies the conditions and circumstances when an Operational Readiness Review (ORR) or a Readiness Assessment (RA) is required as part of a new start or restart process. This standard provides guidance on the planning and conduct of the Operational Readiness Reviews. This standard also provides guidance for requesting exemptions. The requirements for ORRs and RAs apply both to responsible contractors and to DOE. This standard addresses the requirements and suggests methods and approaches for both.

392

Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3020-2005 DOE-STD-3020-2005 December 2005 Supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FOREWARD This U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. This standard was developed primarily for application in DOE programs. It provides guidance to DOE contractors for procurement and required testing of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters used in DOE nuclear facilities. Required testing is performed by the filter manufacturer and

393

Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3020-2005 DOE-STD-3020-2005 December 2005 Supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FOREWARD This U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. This standard was developed primarily for application in DOE programs. It provides guidance to DOE contractors for procurement and required testing of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters used in DOE nuclear facilities. Required testing is performed by the filter manufacturer and

394

DOE Standard: Fire protection design criteria  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The development of this Standard reflects the fact that national consensus standards and other design criteria do not comprehensively or, in some cases, adequately address fire protection issues at DOE facilities. This Standard provides supplemental fire protection guidance applicable to the design and construction of DOE facilities and site features (such as water distribution systems) that are also provided for fire protection. It is intended to be used in conjunction with the applicable building code, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Codes and Standards, and any other applicable DOE construction criteria. This Standard replaces certain mandatory fire protection requirements that were formerly in DOE 5480.7A, ``Fire Protection``, and DOE 6430.1A, ``General Design Criteria``. It also contains the fire protection guidelines from two (now canceled) draft standards: ``Glove Box Fire Protection`` and ``Filter Plenum Fire Protection``. (Note: This Standard does not supersede the requirements of DOE 5480.7A and DOE 6430.1A where these DOE Orders are currently applicable under existing contracts.) This Standard, along with the criteria delineated in Section 3, constitutes the basic criteria for satisfying DOE fire and life safety objectives for the design and construction or renovation of DOE facilities.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

395

DOE-TSPP-8-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary -2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards DOE-TSPP-8-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - September 16, 2013 This procedure provides guidance on the conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCSs). This procedure applies to all Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as Technical Standards Program (TSP) participants) working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards Program. DOE-TSPP-8-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards

396

Enforcement Documents | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Operational Safety Requirements...

397

CRAD, Facility Safety - Unreviewed Safety Question Requirements...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Facility Safety - Unreviewed Safety Question Requirements...

398

About / FAQ | DOE PAGES  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

transition to a full release. DOE PAGESBeta represents DOE's response to the February 2013 Office of Science and Technology Policy memorandum that called on federal agencies to...

399

DOE-HDBK-1215-2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Optimizing Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment for use with DOE O 458.1, ALARA Requirements This Handbook addresses the development and use of a process to keep radiation exposures of the public and environment, and releases of radioactive material to the environment from DOE activities as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), that is; an ALARA process to implement and comply with DOE O 458.1, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment.

400

DOE-STD-3006-2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews Replaced by DOE-STD-3006-2010 | Superseding DOE-STD-3006-95 (November 1995) DOE O 425.1B specifies the conditions and circumstances when an Operational Readiness Review (ORR) or a Readiness Assessment (RA) is required as part of a new start or restart process. This standard provides guidance on the planning and conduct of the ORRs and RAs

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

DOE-HDBK-1122-2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Radiological Control Technician Training Replaced by DOE-HDBK-1122-2009, Part 1: Radiological Control Technician Training and Part 5: Radiological Control Technician Training, Site Academic Training Instructors Guide Phase I, Change Notice 2 (2011) This guide defines and describes the DOE Radiological Control Technician (RCT) Core Training & Qualification Program, material development requirements, standards and policies, and administration. The guide applies to RCT Training & Qualification Programs at all DOE sites

402

To: Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

'J| 'J| MaryBeth Zinmerman 0212212001 10:37 AM ',U To: Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE cc: Nancy Jeffery/EE/DOE@DOE Subject: Old Chpt 2, new Chap 3 Can you work on answering the editor's questions on this? Forwarded by MaryBeth Zimmenman/EE/DOE on 22/2001 10:36 AM "'"- . . Michael York 02/21/2001 01:13 PM To: commcoll@aol.com cc: MaryBeth Zimmerman/EE/DOE@DOE Subject: Chapter 2 Joan, attached is the first chapter to edit. We will be sending you the next chapter as soon as it is available. If you have any questions, please call me at (202) 586-5669. Thanks! Michael York Chapter 2_Energy Impacts_2.16.01.d 22894 DOE024-0300 JOEL RUBIN 02/22/2001 03:00 PM To: Marybeth Zimmerman cc: Nancy Jeffery, Darrell Beschen/EE/DOE@DOE, Michael York Subject Chapter 2 Updates MBZ - This draft incorporates (in blue ink) updates based upon the comments from Joan. Ive deleted Joan's

403

RPAM & Energy Order Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

430.1C, Real Property Asset Management 430.1C, Real Property Asset Management and DOE O 430.2B, Departmental Energy, Renewable Energy and Transportation Management Requirements, Overlap & Differences Office of Engineering and Construction Management September 2009 2 10/27/2009 Energy Order & RPAM Order Requirements DOE O 430.1C - RPAM DOE O 430.2B ENERGY ORDER Energy Efficiency Water Consumption Utility Metering ESPCs & USPCs Personnel - Energy Training Environmental Management System (EMS) Real Property Performance Indicators Sustainable Buildings Facilities Information Management System (FIMS) Personnel - Certified Realty Specialists Ten Year Site Plans Sustainable & Integrated Design TEAM Executable Plans High Performance Building Plan OVERLAP Real Property

404

DOE Contracting Officers and Contract Specialists | Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE DOE DOE Contracting Officers and Contract Specialists Print page Print page Email page Email page A Contracting Officer is the DOE official authorized to execute awards on behalf of DOE and is responsible for the business management and non-program aspects of the financial assistance process. They are responsible for ensuring that the receipt of required interim and final scientific/technical reporting deliverables as identified on DOE F 4600.2, Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist, and in the contract are monitored and provided to DOE/OSTI. Identification of Required DOE Deliverables The Departmental requirement for scientific/technical reporting for this type of award or contract is stated in DOE O 241.1B, 10 CFR 600, and 48 CFR 935.010. The initiator of the procurement request, usually the sponsoring program

405

Order Module--DOE Order 225.1B, ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE O 225.1B prescribes organizational responsibilities, authorities, and requirements for conducting investigations of certain accidents occurring at DOE sites, facilities, areas, operations, and...

406

Why did DOE issue a DEC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

did DOE issue a DEC? did DOE issue a DEC? DOE issued the DEC to more effectively promote U.S. manufacturing of new technologies developed under certain DOE funding agreements (e.g. cooperative agreements), a key objective of the Bayh-Dole Act. What does the DEC do? It allows DOE to require all applicants, regardless of type, to submit U.S. manufacturing plans, use U.S. manufacturing plans to evaluate and select applications, and ensure compliance of U.S. manufacturing plans. What is a U.S. manufacturing plan? A U.S. manufacturing plan is an applicant's measurable commitment to support U.S. manufacturing of the technologies related to their DOE funding agreement. The range of commitment may include, for example, manufacturing certain products in the U.S., investing in U.S. facilities or a licensing strategy

407

DOE-SPEC-3018-96 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

8-96 DOE-SPEC-3018-96 September 12, 1996 DOE Specification, Flooded-Type Lead-Acid Storage Batteries Canceled This specification defines requirements for flooded-type, lead-acid...

408

DOE-STD-1040-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for, Control of On-Shift Training, Chapter V of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. "Control of On-Shift Training" is...

409

DOE-STD-1156-2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard The Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard establishes common functional area competency requirements for Department of Energy personnel who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities impacting the safe operation of DOE’s most hazardous facilities.

410

DOE-HDBK-1108-2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Radiological Safety Training for Accelerator Facilities Reaffirmation with Change Notice 2 (July 2013) This non-mandatory Handbook describes a recommended implementation process for conducting the radiation safety training required by Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Occupational Radiation Protection, (10 CFR 835) Subpart J and as outlined in the DOE standard DOE-STD-1098-99, Radiological Control (RCS).

411

DOE-STD-1182-2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Civil/Structural Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard The Civil/Structural Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard establishes common functional area competency requirements for Department of Energy personnel who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

412

DOE-STD-1091-96  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Firearms Safety Cancellation (January 31, 2008) The purpose of this Technical Standard is to facilitate the development, implementation, and maintenance of a comprehensive firearms safety program so as to achieve the policy objectives and fulfill the requirements delineated in DOE O 440.1, "Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees."

413

DOE-STD-1128-2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide of Good Practices for Occupational Radiological Protection in Plutonium Facilities Replaced by DOE-STD-1128-2013 This Technical Standard (TS) does not contain any new requirements. Its purpose is to provide a guide to good practice, update existing reference material, and discuss practical lessons learned relevant to the safe handling of plutonium.

414

DOE-STD-1128-98  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide of Good Practices for Occupational Radiological Protection in Plutonium Facilities Replaced by DOE-STD-1128-2008 | Reaffirmation with Errata (May 2003) | Change Notice 2 (December 2006) This Technical Standard (TS) does not contain any new requirements. Its purpose is to provide guides to good practice, update existing reference material, and discuss practical lessons learned relevant to the safe handling of plutonium.

415

DOE-STD-1128-98  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide of Good Practices for Occupational Radiological Protection in Plutonium Facilities Replaced by DOE-STD-1128-98 | Reaffirmation with Errata (May 2003) | Change Notice 1 (February 2005) This Technical Standard (TS) does not contain any new requirements. Its purpose is to provide guides to good practice, update existing reference material, and discuss practical lessons learned relevant to the safe handling of plutonium.

416

DOE-STD-1166-2003  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Deactivation and Decommission Functional Area Qualification Standard The Deactivation and Decommissioning Functional Area Qualification Standard establishes common functional area competency requirements for Department of Energy personnel who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

417

DOE Roadmap: Chapter 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Chapter 1. Overview of the DOE Project Chapter 1. Overview of the DOE Project Introduction On April 10, 1945, medical staff of the U.S. Manhattan Engineer District in Oak Ridge, TN, injected plutonium into the victim of a car accident. American scientists had only recently begun producing plutonium, and thousands of workers were laboring to produce the quantities required for the first atomic bombs. While aware that plutonium was hazardous, project officials were uncertain how much exposure would cause harm. Desire for information about human metabolism and retention of plutonium led to this first injection in Oak Ridge. Over the next 2 years, 17 other people also received plutonium injections. The Manhattan Project and its postwar successor, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), also carried out human experiments with uranium, polonium, americium, and other radioactive substances. Radiation tests continued after the war; some of these studies took place under AEC supervision and had direct defense-related applications. The agency also sponsored substantial programs in the medical applications of radiation and in basic biomedical research. In addition, independent physicians and researchers at universities and hospitals conducted many postwar human radiation studies to develop the techniques of present-day nuclear medicine.

418

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18,...

419

DOE Prepares Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Agency or only require updates as the PEIS progresses. A meeting was held with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on November 9, 2011, and DOE initiated the informal consultation...

420

DOE-STD-1025-2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Weapons Quality Assurance Qualification Standard This technical FAQS identifies the minimum technical competency requirements for DOE Weapon Quality Assurance personnel. These positions are the Weapon Quality Assurance Specialist, and the Weapon Quality Assurance Engineer/Scientist.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

DOE-HDBK-1211-2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Activity-Level Work Planning and Control Implementation This Handbook describes non-mandatory approaches for implementing Department of Energy (DOE) requirements for activity-level work planning and control (WP&C).

422

Supervisory Training Requirements | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Supervisory Training Requirements Supervisory Training Requirements Supervisory Training Requirements The Office of Learning and Workforce Development has developed an inventory of training and developmental activities that will meet the supervisory training requirements. The DOE courses, Supervisory Essentials and Navigating the Federal Hiring Process are required to fulfill the first 40-hour of the probationary period mandatory training requirement for new supervisors. All other courses listed in the training framework are suggested to meet overall continual learning requirements. Supervisory Training Requirements More Documents & Publications EM's Development Program for New Managers/Supervisors Presentation DOE F 3315.1 Supervisory - Non-Supervisory Employee Performance Management and

423

Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

40.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE 40.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING NNSA) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING NNSA) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES The familiar level of this module is divided into two sections. In the first section, we will discuss the objective, requirements, and the responsibilities assigned to the heads of field elements. In the second section, we will discuss the content of attachment 1, Functional Area Requirements. We have provided examples and a practice to help familiarize you with the material. The practice will also help prepare you for the criterion test. DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 440.1B, Worker Protection Management for DOE (Including the National Nuclear Security Administration) Federal Employees

424

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

422.1 422.1 CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS DOE O 422.1 Conduct of Operations Familiar Level June 2011 1 June 2011 DOE O 422.1 CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What is the purpose of DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations? 2. What are the typical methods of implementing DOE O 422.1 guidelines? 3. What are the specific requirements as described in attachment 2 of DOE O 422.1? 4. How do the DOE Technical Standards support the specific requirements in DOE O 422.1 Note: If you think that you can complete the practice at the end of this level without working through the instructional material and/or the examples, complete the practice

425

An Assessment of Fault Current Limiter Testing Requirements ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

An Assessment of Fault Current Limiter Testing Requirements An Assessment of Fault Current Limiter Testing Requirements The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Electricity...

426

Crosswalk Tables: DOE O 5820.2A vs. DOE O 435.1/M 435.1-1  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

These crosswalk tables have been prepared to assist in understanding how the requirements that are currently in 5820.2A are addressed in the DOE O 435.1 and DOE M 435.1-1.

1999-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

427

DOE-HDBK-1163-2003  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Integration of Multiple Hazard Analysis Requirements and Activities During Fiscal Year 2001, the joint DOE/EFCOG Chemical Safety Topical Committee (CSTC) formed a team consisting of representatives from several sites and DOE headquarters to evaluate possible methods for integrating hazard analysis activities with potential overlap such as radiological, chemical, emergency preparedness, environmental and others. The CSTC Team identified and reviewed hazard analysis requirements and issues, collected numerous sources of good practices information and evaluated possible methods for integrating hazard analysis activities.

428

Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order defines the safety management program required by 10 CFR 830.204(b)(5) for maintenance and the reliable performance of structures, systems and components that are part of the safety basis required by 10 CFR 830.202 at hazard category 1, 2 and 3 DOE nuclear facilities. Admin Chg 1, dated 3-12-2013. Cancels DOE O 433.1A.

2010-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

429

DOE Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE Lessons Learned Information Services Catches the Eye of Corporations and Educational Institutions

430

DOE Approved Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE.

431

DOE International Energy Advisors  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE’s Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's (OE) Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration Division (ISER) has coordinated and executed interagency support agreements with five of the geographic Combatant Commands to assign a DOE representative — a DOE Energy Advisor — to each of their headquarters.

432

DOE Awards Contract for Management of WIPP  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NEWS NEWS MEDIA CONTACTS: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tom Welch, 202/586-4316 October 12, 2000 Greg Sahd (Carlsbad), 505/234-7532 Department of Energy Competitively Awards Contract for the Management of Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson today announced that the Energy Department will award a $500 million, five-year contract for the management and operation of the department's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in Carlsbad, New Mexico, to Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC. Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC, based in Carlsbad, is a joint venture between Westinghouse Government Environmental Services Company LLC and Roy F. Weston, Inc. "By holding an open competition, the department was able to challenge industry to bring their best ideas forward on actions needed to maintain and improve WIPP's safety and operational

433

Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205851.800.dial.DOE en DOE-STD-1150-2013 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-1150-2013 doe-std-1150-2013" class="title-link">DOE-STD-1150-2013

434

Summary of New DOE-STD-1020-2011 NPH Analysis and Design Criteria for DOE Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of New DOE-STD-1020-2011 Summary of New DOE-STD-1020-2011 NPH Analysis and Design Criteria for DOE Facilities (Proposed) Quazi Hossain, LLNL Joe Hunt, BWXT/Y-12 Robert Kennedy, RPK Consulting Carl Mazzola, Shaw Environmental, Inc. Steve McDuffie, DOE Gerald Meyers, DOE DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Workshop October 25-26, 2011 Purpose of Revising the current version of DOE-STD-1020 * To conform to the new DOE O 420.1C (in review) that no longer refers to the Natural Phenomena Hazards (NPH) guidance document, DOE G 420.1-2 * To provide a single/central guidance document that the new DOE O 420.1C can require for NPH analysis and design criteria * To put back analysis and design requirements for all major NPHs in a single document that were fragmented when, with the issuance of STD-

435

Implementation Guide for DOE Fire Protection and Emergency Services Programs for Use with DOE O 420.1B, Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide facilitates the implementation of requirements of DOE O 420.1B by providing an acceptable approach to meet the requirements for Fire Protection Programs. Cancels DOE G 440.1-5.

2007-09-27T23:59:59.000Z

436

DOE F 3511.1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ORGANIZATION CODE ORGANIZATION CODE 5. SENSITIVITY (Circle Number) 6. FINANCIAL STATEMENT REQUIRED (Circle) 21. FUNCTIONAL CLASS CODE FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS 25. Comp. Level 25. Comp. Area Signature 28. Agency Code 17. Pay Plan Classification Title (continued) 13. DOE F 3511.1 (06-94) (Formerly DOE F 3200.5) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY POSITION DESCRIPTION To be completed by Personnel 1. POSITION NUMBER 3. ACTION (Circle Letter) A=ADD C=CHG D=DEL PART I: TO BE COMPLETED BY THE INITIATING OFFICE 4. ORGANIZATIONAL LOCATION OF POSITION a. First Subdivision (Below DOE) b. Second Subdivision c. Third Subdivision d. Fourth Subdivision e. Fifth Subdivision f. Sixth Subdivision 7. COMPUTER POSITION 8. LEVEL OF ACCESS 9. DUTY STATION

437

Liquefaction Evaluations at DOE Sites  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LIQUEFACTION EVALUATIONS AT LIQUEFACTION EVALUATIONS AT DOE SITES M. Lewis, M. McHood, R. Williams, B. Gutierrez October 25, 2011 Agenda  Background  Purpose and Objective  Liquefaction Methods  Site Evaluations  Aging  Conclusions 2 Background 3 Liquefaction at DOE Sites Background  Liquefaction evaluations are required at all DOE sites  Methods have evolved over the years, but there is currently only one consensus methodology;  Youd et al., 2001  Two other methods have emerged in the last few years;  Cetin et al., 2004  Idriss & Boulanger, 2008 4 Background  Youd et al., was the result of two workshops (NCEER/NSF) held in the late 1990s, culminating in a NCEER report and a ASCE publication in 2001. The method is widely used.  Cetin et al., was the result of several doctoral

438

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

18, 2013 18, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period September 30, 2013 through October 31, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) October 15, 2013: A manager at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) determined that the AMWTP Safety Analysis process required review due to an operational trend of fire/combustion events in the Treatment Facility (TF) box lines. Safety analysis for the TF is

439

DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 1, 2009 July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance on the conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCSs), also referred to as non-Government standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications

440

DOE/WIPP-13-3507  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE/WIPP-13-3507 DOE/WIPP-13-3507 2 This page intentionally left blank Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2012 DOE/WIPP-13-3507 3 2012 Annual Site Environmental Report To our readers: This Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Annual Site Environmental Report for 2012 presents summary environmental data to (1) characterize site environmental management performance; (2) summarize environmental occurrences and responses reported during the calendar year; (3) confirm compliance with environmental standards and requirements; and (4) highlight the WIPP Environmental Management System (EMS), significant environmental programs, and accomplishments, including progress toward U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Sustainability Goals.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

DOE-STD-1021-93  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Natural Phenomena Hazards Performance Categorization Guidelines for Structures, Systems, and Components Replaced by DOE-STD-1020-2012 | Change Notice No. 1 (January 1996) | Reaffirmed with Errata (April 2002) The purpose of this standard is as follows: (a) To provide, for the purpose of Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) design and evaluation, criteria for selecting performance categories (PCs) of structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in accordance with the requirements specified in DOE Order 420.1 (Reference 10) and the NPH Guide to DOE O 420.1 (DOE G 420.1-2) (Reference 11).

442

DOE-STD-1020-2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for Department of Energy Facilities Supersedes DOE-STD-1020-2002 This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard (STD)-1020-2012, Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for DOE Facilities, provides criteria and guidance for the analysis and design of facility structures, systems, and components (SSCs) that are necessary to implement the requirements of DOE Order (O) 420.1C, Facility Safety, and to ensure that the SSCs will be able to effectively perform their intended safety functions under the effects of natural phenomena hazards (NPHs).

443

DOE Technical Standards Program Standards Actions Newsletter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

* * New DOE Standard, Communicating Waste Characterization and DOT Hazard Classification Requirements * Workshops and Events * The Annual Energy Facility Contractors Group Safety Analysis Workshop * 2012 Chemical Safety and Life Cycle Management Workshop * Nuclear Safety- Related Standards Activity INSIDE THIS ISSUE April 2012 Standards Actions Technical Standards Program Newsletter www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ New DOE Standard, Communicating Waste Characterization and DOT Hazard Classification Requirements The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) has a challenging mission to solve many problems posed by the legacy of the Cold War, including the transportation of unprecedented amounts of contaminated waste,

444

DOE O 534.1B  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Departmental Elements Departmental Elements Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE O 534.1B U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 01-06-03 SUBJECT: ACCOUNTING 1. OBJECTIVE. To prescribe the requirements and responsibilities for the accounting and financial management of the Department of Energy (DOE). 2. CANCELLATION. DOE O 534.1A, Accounting, dated 7-5-01. Cancellation of an Order does not, by itself, modify or otherwise affect any contractual obligation to comply with such an Order. Canceled Orders incorporated by reference in a contract remain in effect until the contract is modified to delete the reference to the requirements in the canceled Orders. 3. APPLICABILITY. a. DOE Elements. To ensure sound financial management and overall consistency in exercising the financial management statutory authorities that vest in the

445

Building Technologies Office: DOE Challenge Home  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Challenge Home DOE Challenge Home Since 2008, the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Builders Challenge program has recognized hundreds of leading builders for their achievements in energy efficiency-resulting in over 14,000 energy efficient homes and millions of dollars in energy savings. The DOE Challenge Home - an ambitious successor to the Builders Challenge program - represents a whole new level of home performance, with rigorous requirements that ensure outstanding levels of energy savings, comfort, health, and durability. Find partners & homes Locate top builders and zero net-energy ready homes Find partners & homes Technical Resources Requirements for building and certifying a DOE Challenge Home Technical Resources Become a Partner Complete online registration to become a partner

446

AMS/DOE Graduate Fellowship  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The American Meteorological Society (AMS) Fellowship Program was established in 1991. To date, AMS has awarded over 150 Fellowships. This five year DOE award provided for one Fellowship a year for five years. The objective of this program is to provide enough funding to a student so as to allow the student to focus solely on coursework requirements, thus allowing them to begin their research at an earlier date.

NONE- Award was administerd by AMS Director of Development Stepahanie Armstrong

2011-06-15T23:59:59.000Z

447

DOE F 4600.2 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

4600.2 DOE F 4600.2 Form provides a checklist of reporting requirements related to programs or projects receiving federal financial assistance. FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REPORTING...

448

DOE/EIA-0202(92/1Q)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

production will be limited to domestic requirements plus a small volume of exports to Jordan. This assumes the United Nations embargo against Iraq continues and Iraq does not...

449

Nuclear Explosive and Weapon Surety Program - DOE Directives...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Order provides requirements and responsibilities to prevent unintendedunauthorized detonation and deliberate unauthorized use of nuclear explosives. Cancels DOE O 452.1B....

450

Nuclear Explosive and Weapon Surety Program - DOE Directives...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Order provides requirements and responsibilities to prevent unintendedunauthorized detonation and deliberate unauthorized use of nuclear explosives. Cancels DOE O 452.1. Canceled...

451

Nuclear Explosive and Weapon Surety Program - DOE Directives...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Order provides requirements and responsibilities to prevent unintendedunauthorized detonation and deliberate unauthorized use of nuclear explosives. Cancels DOE O 452.1A....

452

DOE ZERH Orientation Webinar: Better Business for Builders  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Description: The DOE Zero Energy Ready Home represents a whole new level of home performance, with rigorous requirements that ensure outstanding levels of energy savings, comfort, health, and...

453

DOE Adopts Rules to Improve Energy Efficiency Enforcement | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Appliance Standards Investigation for Certain Air Con International Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps DOE Announces Tougher Enforcement of Appliance Standards Reporting Requirements...

454

DOE Steps Lead to Significant Increase in Compliance with Energy...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Department of Energy Subpoenas Compliance Data from AeroSys, Inc. DOE Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners Violating Minimum Appliance Standards...

455

DOE-STD-3020-2005 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Supersedes DOE NE F3-45 (January 1987) This standard establishes specification and testing requirements for High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters procured to provide...

456

DOE-CBFO-09-3441 FRAM REV 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

MATRIX Directive No. Directive Title Responsible CBFO Org Contractor Requirements Document (CRD)? DOE O 100.1 Secretarial Succession, Threat Level Notification, and...

457

DOE-STD-1195-2011 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

05, 2011 Design of Safety Significant Safety Instrumented Systems Used at DOE Non-Reactor Nuclear Facilities This standard provides requirements and guidance for the design,...

458

DRAFT - DOE O 333.1, Administering Work Force Discipline  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To provide requirements and responsibilities for administering workforce discipline that includes disciplinary, adverse, and alternative corrective actions in the Department of Energy (DOE).

459

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- BurrisPark_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

by UC-Berkeley require no further remediation. Final Conditions- The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed maintenance-only responsibility for the remaining contamination in...

460

Nonreactor Nuclear Safety Design Guide for use with DOE O 420.1C, Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides an acceptable approach for safety design of DOE hazard category 1, 2 and 3 nuclear facilities for satisfying the requirements of DOE O 420.1C. Cancels DOE G 420.1-1.

2012-12-04T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Nuclear Facility Maintenance Management Program Guide for Use with DOE O 433.1  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide describes a maintenance management program that would be acceptable to DOE for meeting the requirements of DOE O 433.1. Canceled by DOE G 433.1-1A.

2001-09-05T23:59:59.000Z

462

DOE M 231.1-2  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

M 231.1-2 M 231.1-2 Approved: 08-19-03 OCCURRENCE REPORTING AND PROCESSING OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE M 231.1-2 Page i (and ii) 08-19-03 SUBJECT: OCCURRENCE REPORTING AND PROCESSING OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION 1. PURPOSE. This Manual provides detailed requirements to supplement DOE O 231.1A, Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting, dated 08-19-03. This Manual is approved for use by all DOE Elements and their contractors. 2. REFERENCE. DOE O 231.1A, Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting, dated 08-19-03. 3. CANCELLATION. DOE M 232.1-1A, Occurrence Reporting and Processing of Operations Information, dated 7-21-97. Cancellation of a Manual does not, by itself, modify or otherwise

463

LFRG DOE Order 435.1 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LFRG DOE Order 435.1 LFRG DOE Order 435.1 LFRG DOE Order 435.1 Chapter 4 of the DOE Manual on Order 435.1, Low-level Waste Requirements, addresses the procedures whereby Department of Energy LLW Disposal Facilities will operated and maintained. Section P and Section Q describe the Performance Assessment and Composite Analysis documents that each DOE disposal facility will submit to the LFRG. To view the entire DOE Order, Manual, and Implementation Guidance documents, choose the link below to get to the main DOE Directives portal and follow the search requirements. DOE Directives, Regulations, and Standards Portal Note - For DOE O 435.1 Chg 1 (08-28-01), please use the above link and follow the search option to locate this document. P. Disposal. Low-level waste disposal facilities shall meet the following

464

DOE Challenge Home Recommended Quality Management Provisions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Recommended Quality Recommended Quality Management Provisions RECOMMENDED QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS QM Provision Builder Documentation & Verification Requirements Rater/Verifier Requirements QM #1: Project Documentation Complete construction documents shall be qualified as Designed to Earn ENERGY STAR and document all additional provisions and specifications required for DOE Challenge Home including mandatory provisions: 2012 IECC envelope insulation levels, ENERGY STAR windows, duct work in conditioned space, hot water distribution requirements requirements for indoor fixtures, EPA Indoor airPLUS checklist, and Renewable Energy Ready Home Checklists. Develop and store construction documents which, at a minimum, shall include all content required to consistently implement

465

Competition Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chapter 6.1 (July 2011) Chapter 6.1 (July 2011) 1 Competition Requirements [Reference: FAR 6 and DEAR 906] Overview This section discusses competition requirements and provides a model Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC). Background The Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) of 1984 requires that all acquisitions be made using full and open competition. Seven exceptions to using full and open competition are specifically identified in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.3. Documentation justifying the use of any of these exceptions is required. The exception, with supporting documentation, must be certified and approved at certain levels that vary according to the dollar value of the

466

Competition Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Chapter 6.1 (February 2011) 1 Competition Requirements [Reference: FAR 6 and DEAR 906] Overview This section discusses competition requirements and provides a model Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC). Background The Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) of 1984 requires that all acquisitions be made using full and open competition. Seven exceptions to using full and open competition are specifically identified in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.3. Documentation justifying the use of any of these exceptions is required. The exception, with supporting documentation, must

467

DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Administered by the HSS Office of Corporate Safety Programs, the DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program (DOELAP) is responsible for implementing performance standards for DOE contractor external dosimetry and radiobioassay programs through periodic performance testing and on-site program assessments.

468

Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

ehss908241 Approved DOE Technical Standards en DOE-STD-3009-2014 http:energy.govehssdownloadsdoe-std-3009-2014

469

DOE G 414  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE)...

470

2012 DOE Sustainability Awards  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

In 2012, DOE Sustainability Awards recognized 20 teams and individuals representing DOE national laboratories for their outstanding sustainability contributions, including accomplishments in managing pollution, waste, energy, water, and vehicle fleets.

471

The physical and chemical state of Westinghouse Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell assemblies after long term operation: Surface and near-surface analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An attempt was made to correlate performance losses with materials compatibility and compositional changes in Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell (PAFC) electrode assemblies as a function of operation time. Westinghouse PAFC stacks were run under a constant operating regime and portions of some of the single cells were analysed after stack operation for 5000 hrs and for 16,000 hrs along with appropriate reference samples. The PAFC assemblies were disassembled, sectioned where appropriate and analyzed using scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM), Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS), electron microprobe analysis (EMP), and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The profiles of the Pt catalyst in both the anode and the cathode layer did not show any preferential loss or peaking. The most pronounced change in cell composition detected following stack operation for 5000 and for 16,000 hours was the increase in Pt/C ratio, that was related to loss of carbon from the cathode electrocatalyst. In contrast, the anode catalyst layer maintains the same ratio of Pt/C following 16,000 hours of operation. The loss of carbon is thought to occur by an electrochemical mechanism and is enhanced at the higher potentials experienced by the air cathode in the fuel cell. In addition, TEM results clearly demonstrate the well recognized phenomenon of Pt particle agglomeration in the cathode catalyst layer, which is seen to be quite substantial after 5000 hours of stack operation. The mechanical integrity of the assemblies was found to be quite satisfactory after 5000 hours, but much less so after 16,000 hours. Questions regarding carbon and Pt corrosion, Pt migration, and the mechanical and physical integrity of the PAFC structures are addressed and are all postulated to be contributing to the observed cell performance losses. 10 refs., 17 figs.

Paffett, M.T.; Hutchinson, W.; Farr, J.D.; Papin, P.; Beery, J.G.; Gottesfeld, S. (Los Alamos National Lab., NM (USA)); Feret, J. (Westinghouse Electric Corp., Pittsburgh, PA (USA))

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

DOE-STD-6003-96  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Safety of Magnetic Fusion Facilities: Guidance This document provides guidance for the implementation of the requirements identified in DOE-STD-6002-96, Safety of Magnetic Fusion Facilities: Requirements. This guidance is intended for the managers, designers, operators, and other personnel with safety responsibilities for facilities designated as magnetic fusion facilities.

473

Completed DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Completed) Completed) Project Number Title Document ID SLM / ORG Author / Phone / Email Status / Review Date P1020-2002REV National Phenomena hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for DOE Facilities DOE-STD-1020-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30) P1066-1999REV Fire Protection and Emergency Services Program and Design Criteria (revision to DOE-STD-1066-99) DOE-STD-1066-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30)

474

Implementation Guide for Use in Developing Technical Safety Requirements  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides elaboration for the content of TSRs. Section 10 CFR 830.205 of the Nuclear Safety Management rule, requires Department of Energy (DOE) contractors responsible for category 1, 2, and 3 DOE nuclear facilities to develop Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs). These TSRs identify the limitations to each DOE owned, contractor operated nuclear facility based on the documented safety analysis (DSA) and any additional safety requirements established for the facility. Does not cancel other directives.

2010-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

475

Implementation Guide for Use in Developing Technical Safety Requirements  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides elaboration for the content of TSRs. Section 10 CFR 830.205 of the Nuclear Safety Management rule, requires Department of Energy (DOE) contractors responsible for category 1, 2, and 3 DOE nuclear facilities to develop Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs). These TSRs identify the limitations to each DOE owned, contractor operated nuclear facility based on the documented safety analysis (DSA) and any additional safety requirements established for the facility. Cancels DOE G 423.1-1.

2010-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

476

Cyber Security Requirements for Wireless Devices and Information Systems  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Notice establishes DOE policy requirements and responsibilities for using wireless networks and devices within DOE and implements the requirements of DOE 0 205.1, Department of Energy Cyber Security Management Program, dated 3-21-03, including requirements for cyber resource protection, risk management, program evaluation, and cyber security plan development and maintenance. No cancellation. DOE N 205.15, dated 3/18/05, extends this directive until 3/18/06.

2004-02-11T23:59:59.000Z

477

Extension of DOE Directives  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Notice extends the following directives until 2/16/04: DOE N 205.2, Foreign National Access to DOE Cyber Systems, and DOE N 205.3, Password Generation, Protection, and Use, dated 11/23/99-7/1/00.

2003-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

478

EFCOG / DOE Electrical Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of electrical hazards used in the DOE Electrical Safety Handbook and laboratory programs. Thus, portionsEFCOG / DOE Electrical Safety Improvement Project Project Area 4 ­Performance Measurement personnel. This tool is also intended to assist DOE organizations in determining and classifying ORPS

479

DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-1092 and others guidance for the "Analyze the Hazard" step of DOE's Integrated Safety Management (ISM

480

NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations - DOE Directives...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations by Diane Johnson The objective of this Order is to define the requirements for establishing and implementing Conduct of...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe requires westinghouse" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Order Module--DOE STD-1098-2008, DOE STANDARD: RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

"The radiological control program discussed in DOE-STD-1098-2008 goes beyond the scope of, and includes more details than, the documented radiation protection program (RPP) required by 10 CFR 835, ...

482

10 C.F.R. Part 820- Procedural Rules for DOE Nuclear Activities  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This part sets forth the procedures to govern the conduct of persons involved in DOE nuclear activities and, in particular, to achieve compliance with the DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements by all persons subject to those requirements.

483

DOE-STD-1027-92 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1027-92 DOE-STD-1027-92 DOE-STD-1027-92 December 12, 1997 Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports Change Notice No. 1 (September 1997) The purpose of this DOE Standard is to establish guidance for the preparation and review of hazard categorization and accident analyses techniques as required in DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports. DOE-STD-1027-92, Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques For Compliance With DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports More Documents & Publications NSTP 2002-2 Methodology for Final Hazard Categorization for Nuclear Facilities from Category 3 to Radiological (11/13/02). DOE-EM-STD-5502-94 INTERPRETATION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD 1027-92,

484

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 440.1B, Worker Protection Management for DOE (Including the National Nuclear Security Administration) Federal Employees  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0.1B 0.1B WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES DOE O 440.1B Familiar Level June 2011 1 DOE O 440.1B WORKER PROTECTION MANAGEMENT FOR DOE (INCLUDING THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What are the objectives of DOE O 440.1B? 2. What are the requirements that DOE elements must meet according to DOE O 440.1B? 3. What is the hazard prevention/abatement process that must be implemented according to DOE O 440.1B? 4. What are three responsibilities assigned by DOE O 440.1B for heads of field elements?

485

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 460.1C Packaging and Transportation Safety and DOE O 460.2A Departmental Materials Transportation and Packaging Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

60.1C 60.1C PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY DOE O 460.2A DEPARTMENTAL MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION AND PACKAGING MANAGEMENT DOE O 460.1C and 460.2A Familiar Level June 2011 1 DOE O 460.1C PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY DOE O 460.2A DEPARTMENTAL MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION AND PACKAGING MANAGEMENT FAMILIAR LEVEL _________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to perform the following: 1. What are the objectives of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) O 460.1C? 2. What is the DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) exemption process in DOE O 460.1C? 3. What are the onsite safety requirements specified by DOE O 460.1C? 4. What are the objectives of DOE O 460.2A?

486

DOE ISM CHAMPIONS  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9/27/12 9/27/12 DOE ISM CHAMPIONS Organization Points of Contact Phone E-mail DOE ISM Co- Champion (HSS) Pat Worthington (301) 903-5926 pat.worthington@hq.doe.gov DOE ISM Co- Champion (EM) Ray Corey (509) 376-0108 ray_j_corey@rl.gov Ames Cindy Baebler (630) 252-1563 cynthia.baebler@ch.doe.gov Argonne Joanna M. Livengood (630) 252-2366 joanna.livengood@ch.doe.gov Brookhaven Bob Desmarais (631) 344-5434 rdesmarais@bnl.gov CBFO Josef A. Sobieraj (575) 234-7499 Josef.sobieraj@wipp.ws CDNS Don F. Nichols (202) 586-8216 don.nichols@nnsa.doe.gov Chicago Justin Zamirowski (630) 252-2248 justin.zamirowski@ch.doe.gov CNS-Energy Chip Lagdon (301) 903-4218 (202) 586-0799 chip.lagdon@hq.doe.gov EE Gary Staffo (202) 586-9577 gary.staffo@ee.doe.gov EM James A. Hutton (202) 586-0975 james.hutton@em.doe.gov

487

DOE Patents Database - FAQ's  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Why was this database developed and by whom? How is this collection different than the one at the United States Patent and Trademark Office? What are the criteria for including patent records in this collection? How do you determine these patents were sponsored by DOE? How many patents are in this collection? Does the collection include all of DOE's patents? Does this collection include the full text for each patent? What time frame is covered by DOepatents? How often is this collection and Web site updated? Does the U.S. Government have exclusive rights to these inventions? What is OSTI? Where can I find information about doing business with DOE? How can I find additional information on the patenting process? Where can I find patents that are not related to DOE?

488

DOE Challenge Home Verification  

Energy Savers [EERE]

X Compliance with Mandator y Appliance Requir ements X Compliance with Mandator y Light ing Requirements X Compliance with Mandatory Fan Efficiency Requirements X...

489

DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity Advisory Committee DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity Advisory Committee January 15, 2009 -...

490

VFP: Program Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Program Requirements Program Requirements Home Welcome Researcher! Preparing for Your Visit Your Arrival Your First Day Weekly Activities Program Requirements Checkout FAQ The DOE WDTS site has comprehensive information on Participant Obligations. Consult that site for more information on all deliverables except the Fermilab Summer Interns website. Attendance: Complete the full ten-week program and attend all scheduled events including lectures, tours and group activities. Entrance Survey: Complete the entrance survey within your first week at Fermilab. One-page Peer Review Provide a one-page written peer review of another SULI intern' talk or poster. Abstract for General Audience Complete and submit an abstract summarizing your research experience. Oral or Poster Presentation: Deliver an oral or poster presentation to mentors and peers the final week

491

BER Science Network Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Network Network Requirements Report of the Biological and Environmental Research Network Requirements Workshop Conducted July 26 and 27, 2007 BER Science Network Requirements Workshop Biological and Environmental Research Program Office, DOE Office of Science Energy Sciences Network Bethesda, MD - July 26 and 27, 2007 ESnet is funded by the US Dept. of Energy, Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) program. Dan Hitchcock is the ESnet Program Manager. ESnet is operated by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, which is operated by the University of California for the US Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. This work was supported by the Directors of the Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Facilities Division, and the Office of Biological &

492

SULI: Program Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Program Requirements Program Requirements Home Welcome Intern! Preparing for Your Internship Your Arrival Your First Day Weekly Activities Program Requirements Checkout FAQ The DOE WDTS site has comprehensive information on Participant Obligations. Consult that site for more information on all deliverables except the Fermilab Summer Interns website. Attendance: Complete the full ten-week program and attend all scheduled events including lectures, tours and group activities. Entrance Survey: First create an account by following the link, educationLink New Account Setup. After creating the account, you can login to the educationLink site. Complete the entrance survey posted on your EduLink site within your first week at Fermilab. One-page Peer Review Provide a one-page written peer review of another SULI intern' talk or

493

DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM SSAB » DOE Manual - EM SSAB » DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM This Manual supplements the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Title 5 United States Code (U.S.C.), Appendix 2, as amended, and the General Services Administration's (GSA's) final rule "Federal Advisory Committee Management" Title 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 102-3, which establishes the policies and minimum requirements for Federal agencies to manage and administer advisory committees. The Manual provides detailed Department of Energy (DOE or Department) requirements, responsibilities, processes, and procedures for the establishment, operation, and management of advisory committees. DOE Manual - Advisory Committee Management Program

494

DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM SSAB » DOE Manual - EM SSAB » DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM This Manual supplements the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Title 5 United States Code (U.S.C.), Appendix 2, as amended, and the General Services Administration's (GSA's) final rule "Federal Advisory Committee Management" Title 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 102-3, which establishes the policies and minimum requirements for Federal agencies to manage and administer advisory committees. The Manual provides detailed Department of Energy (DOE or Department) requirements, responsibilities, processes, and procedures for the establishment, operation, and management of advisory committees. DOE Manual - Advisory Committee Management Program

495

Required Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Required Documents Required Documents Required Documents All foreign nationals, including students and postdocs, must select the foreign nationals employment category to complete the new-hire process. Contact (505) 665-7158 Email Complete following forms before New-Hire Orientation Be sure to bring the forms with you for the orientation event, but do not sign and date: Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification (pdf) - original, unexpired documents for verification of employment eligibility. Please refer to the I-9 verification form titled, "Lists of Acceptable Documents", which was included with your offer letter. (Laminated documents or hospital/temporary birth certificates are not accepted.) Note: Failure to provide required documents will result in delay and/or

496

Competition Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chapter 6.1 (April 2009) Chapter 6.1 (April 2009) Competition Requirements [Reference: FAR 6 and DEAR 906] Overview This section discusses competition requirements and provides a model Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC). Background The Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) of 1984 requires that all acquisitions be made using full and open competition. Seven exceptions to using full and open competition are specifically identified in FAR Part 6. Documentation justifying the use of any of these exceptions is required. The exception, with supporting documentation, must be certified and approved at certain levels that vary according to the dollar value of the acquisition. The information that must be included in each justification is

497

Competition Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chapter 6.1 (April 2010) Chapter 6.1 (April 2010) 1 Competition Requirements [Reference: FAR 6 and DEAR 906] Overview This section discusses competition requirements and provides a model Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC). Background The Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) of 1984 requires that all acquisitions be made using full and open competition. Seven exceptions to using full and open competition are specifically identified in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.3. Documentation justifying the use of any of these exceptions is required. The exception, with supporting documentation, must be certified and approved at certain levels that vary according to the dollar value of the acquisition. The information that must be included in each justification is identified in FAR

498

Waste to Energy Power Production at DOE and DOD Sites  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Waste to Energy Power Production Waste to Energy Power Production at DOE and DOD Sites January 13, 2011 Overview - Federal Agency Innovations DOE: S avannah River S ite * Biomass Heat and Power US AF: Hill Air Force Base * Landfill Gas to Energy Generation Ameresco independent DOES avannah River S ite DOES avannah River S ite (DOE-S R) * Georgia / S outh Carolina border * 300+ sq miles extending into 3 counties * Began operations in 1950s Challenges faced by DOE-S R * Aging Infrastructure Ameresco independent * Coal and fuel oil power plants * Increased / new clean air requirements * New energy efficiency / sustainability requirements Business Case Analysis S ite need for both steam and power Repair, renovate, or replace Mandates and desire for renewable energy solution Appropriated funds not available

499

Revision to DOE Order 435.1 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Management » Compliance » Revision to DOE Program Management » Compliance » Revision to DOE Order 435.1 Revision to DOE Order 435.1 The Office of Environmental Management has primary responsibility, within DOE, for DOE Order 435.1, the self-regulation of radioactive waste management. As part of this responsibility, EM has decided to update the Order to incorporate several changes to the regulatory process that have taken place over the last decade as well as streamline the Order to improve management of the waste. A comprehensive complex-wide review of DOE radioactive waste management activities associated with implementation of the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, was conducted in 2010 in order to gather feedback on the effectiveness of the DOE Order 435.1 requirements (not to assess compliance with the

500

DOE-STD-1187-2005 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1187-2005 DOE-STD-1187-2005 DOE-STD-1187-2005 May 12, 2005 Beryllium-Associated Worker Registry Data Collection and Management Guidance Replaced by DOE-STD-1187-2007 This standard provides acceptable methods for compliance with the requirements of title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 850.39 (10 CFR 850.39) "Recordkeeping and Use of Information. '" It should be used by resposnbile employers subject to the requirements of 10 CFR 850 "Chronic Beryllium Disease Preventopm Program" to guide their submission of information to the Department of Energy (DOE) Beryllium-Associated Worker Registry. DOE-STD-1187-2005, Beryllium-Associated Worker Registry Data Collection and Management Guidance More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-1187-2007 DOE-STD-1190-2007