Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National...

2

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage...

3

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for...

4

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CECDOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDADOE...

5

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting June 16, 2014...

6

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program 7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Make energy storage ubiquitous ESS Program Makeup ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - BPA ETO based STATCOM Project - ETO Development Project - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - Iowa Stored Energy Project - Electrolyte Research

7

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage 8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Develop advanced power electronics for the grid of the future

8

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: Independent Peer Reviews  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen Manufacturing Fuel Cells Applications/Technology Validation Safety Codes and Standards Education Basic Research Systems Analysis Systems Integration Independent Reviews Macro-System Model U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Systems Integration > Independent Peer Reviews Printable Version Independent Peer Reviews DOE's Systems Integrator convenes independent technical reviews to gauge progress toward meeting specific technical targets and to provide technical information necessary for key decisions. These independent reviews are important to the program: They provide an unbiased understanding of the status of the program's technical targets based on the input of independent technical experts. This understanding is critical to program decision-making, budget

9

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 18 -22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia.

Satyapal, S.

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program 6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - HybSim Hybrid Storage Model Development Congressionally-Directed Programs - University of Missouri-Rolla - Grid Modernization - Iowa Stored Energy Project - EEI - BiPolar Ni-MH Battery Development - Sprint - Storage for Telecommunications Apps. - Emerson - Network Power - Beacon Power - Frequency Regulation Plant Design - Mead Westvaco - Research on Lead-Carbon Asymmetric Super capacitors (FY05) ESS Program Makeup (cont.) ESS Program Makeup cont. SBIR - Aegis Technology - PII - Arkansas Power Electronic International -

11

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage 9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Significant Events in FY09 Power Electronics Subprogram suffered a large budget cut in FY09 and was dropped as a separate program for FY10. ESSP will reabsorb power electronics development for energy storage applications back into program. Funding Due to a lengthy Congressional continuing resolution, FY09 funding was not received until April Power Electronics Sub-Program ESSP Program Highlights

12

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2010 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held June 7-11, 2010 in Washington, D.C.

Not Available

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

13

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review - Sept, 2007 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III...

14

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

15

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

18

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

20

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Peer Merit / Review Policies Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE Smart Grid Demonstration Program ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Demonstration Program Smart Grid Energy Storage Demonstrations Overview Ron Staubly - National Energy Technology Laboratory DOE Smart Grid Demonstration Program The Program At a...

22

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems...

23

ORISE: Enhancing Peer Review Tools and Services to Support DOE...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to specific presentations prior to the five-day U.S. Department of Energy's Hydrogen Fuel Cells and Vehicle Technologies annual program evaluation and review-the largest for...

24

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

25

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Superconducting Flywheel Development Phil Johnson FESS Program Manager Boeing Phantom Works DOE Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Superconducting Flywheel Development Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 2 Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. 50kW / 5kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Off-Grid Demo System Objective: *Design, build and deliver a flywheel energy storage system tailored for off- grid applications utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) Bearing Goal: *Successfully integrate the FESS system into a demonstration site One of three deployment options for the demo system, shown in relation to

26

Peer Review Policy | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policy Grants & Contracts Guidance Laboratory Scientific Focus Area...

27

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Sept , 2008 Peer Review Sept , 2008 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Superconducting Flywheel Development 2 Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Flywheel Energy Storage Systems Objective: *Design, build and deliver flywheel energy storage systems utilizing high temperature superconducting (HTS) bearings tailored for uninterruptible power systems and off-grid applications Goal: *Successfully integrate FESS into a demonstration site through cooperative agreements with DOE and contracts with Sandia National Labs Deployment of a demo system, shown in relation to diesel genset and balance of system. Over All Status:

28

2007 Annual Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2007 Annual Peer Review 2007 Annual Peer Review September 27, 2007 San Francisco, California Welcoming Remarks Imre Gyuk US Dept. of Energy DOE / ESS Program Overview (View .pdf) John Boyes Sandia National Laboratories PRESENTATIONS\ ECONOMICS - BENEFIT STUDIES Evaluating Value Propositions for Four Modular Electricity Storage Demonstrations in California (View .pdf) Jim Eyer (Distributed Utility Assoc.) Update on Benefit and Cost Comparison of Modular Energy Storage Technologies for Four Viable Value Propositions (View .pdf) Susan Schoenung (Longitude 122 West, Inc.) ECONOMICS - ENVIRONMENT BENEFITS STUDIES Emissions from Traditional & Flywheel Plants for Regulation Services (View .pdf) Rick Fioravanti (KEMA, Inc.) UTILITY & COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS

29

Peer Review Policies | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Peer Review Policies Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity...

30

Peer Merit / Review Policies | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

31

2010 DOE Peer Review Update Conference LIST OF ATTENDEES Last Name First Name Organization Country  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2/2010 2/2010 1 2010 DOE Peer Review Update Conference LIST OF ATTENDEES Last Name First Name Organization Country Aalmans Luc General Compression USA Adams Michael Constellation Energy USA Agar Ertan Drexel University USA Agrawal Poonum Sentech, Inc USA Ahmed Jasim BOSCH USA Akhil Abbas Sandia National Laboratories USA Alexander Iwan Case Western Reserve University USA Alexander Jane USA Amy Fabrice Air Products USA Anderson Dianne Case Western Reserve University USA Anderson Travis Sandia National Laboratories USA Andrews George Oak Ridge National Laboratory USA Arseneaux James Beacon Power Corporation USA Aselage Terrence Sandia National Laboratories USA Asgeirsson Haukur DTE Energy USA Atcitty Stan Sandia National Laboratories USA

32

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review - DOE Peer Review - Sept, 2007 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Superconducting Flywheel Development 2 Flywheel Energy Storage Systems Objective: *Design, build and deliver flywheel energy storage systems utilizing high temperature superconducting (HTS) bearings tailored for uninterruptible power systems and off-grid applications Goal: *Successfully integrate FESS into a demonstration site through cooperative agreements with DOE and contracts with Sandia National Labs Deployment of a demo system, shown in relation to diesel genset and balance of system. Status: *The 1 kWh / 3 kW test was successful

33

Building Technologies Program: Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program: Peer Review on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Program: Peer Review on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Program: Peer Review on Delicious Rank Building...

34

PEER REVIEW PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect

The Institute for Regulatory Science (RS) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) jointly estab lished a peer-review program. As the program evolved, four types of review were established. A process for stakeholder participation in peer review eetings was also developed. While a committee established by the ASME provided oversight to the peer-review process, the RSI managed the day-to-day operations of peer review panels. In addition to the reports resulting from peer review of specific projects, several documents were prepared to facilitate the review process, all of which were widely distributed.

MOGHISSI, A ALAN; LOVE, BETTY R; STRAJA, SORIN R

2007-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

35

CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Iowa Stored Energy Park DOE Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review Fairmont Hotel Washington, DC September 29, 2008 Kent Holst, Development Director Iowa Stored Energy Park Funding: Congressional Ear-mark CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Today's Presentation Past Present Future Funding CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE c CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Iowa's municipal utilities saw this. 1. Economic feasibility studies. 2. Geologic research. 3. Computer modeling. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Will ISEP make money? 1. Missouri River Energy Services. 2. Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Next steps: 1. Drill two test wells. 2. Pump tests, water & air. 3. Refine computer modeling. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Funding 1. Municipal utilities -$1.15 million. 2. DOE - $6 million. 3. Iowa Power Fund - $3.2 million.

36

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to focus additional resources. Peer Reviews are intended to meet the requirements of DOE Order 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets,...

37

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in

38

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Economics Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Economics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Economics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September...

39

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AgendaPresentation List Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - AgendaPresentation List The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power...

40

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

These reports summarize the comments of expert peer reviewers at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, where each year projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on...

42

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW FINAL REPORT  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT 22106 Background Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) signed a cooperative agreement with DOE on 93004 to develop a novel gasifier concept, which...

43

EMSL: External Peer Reviewers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS Additional Information User Portal 2014 Call for Proposals 2014 Proposal Guidance 2014 Proposal Review Criteria Guidance for Letters of Intent to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call Guidance for Full Proposals to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call (Invited Only) 2014 Proposal Planning 2014 Proposal Summary/Extension Previous Calls External Peer Reviewers Fellowships and Awards Nufo, logo External peer reviewers are valuable contributors to EMSL's user proposals process. They provide objective evaluations of the quality of the proposals according to established review criteria, and participate on Review Panels that calibrate the proposals into a ranked order. EMSL is truly grateful to the researchers who donated their time and efforts in fiscal year 2012 to

44

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentati...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Electronics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer...

45

EERE Peer Review Guide - August 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PEER REVIEW GUIDE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Based on a Survey of Best Practices for In-Progress Peer Review Prepared by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Peer Review Task Force August 2004 EERE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Acknowledgements DOE/EERE, and the Peer Review Task Force particularly, acknowledge the generous and important contributions to this Guide of Review Panel Chairman Ronald N. Kostoff, Office of Naval Research, and expert panel members and reviewers: Greg Stover, NASA; Paul Doremus, NIST; Richard Silberglitt, Rand; Kerry L. Dearfield, EPA; Jim Cassatt, NIH; Daryl Chubin, NACME; Fiona Wood, Australia; Frans van den Beemt, Netherlands; Larry James, DOE; and David Tratt, NASA. Notice This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States

46

DOE Hydrogen Program 2004 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This document summarizes the project evaluations and comments from the DOE Hydrogen Program 2004 Annual Program Review. Hydrogen production, delivery and storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; and education R&D projects funded by DOE in FY2004 are reviewed.

Not Available

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

Microsoft Word - A-14-09-29169 Final DOE Peer Review Ltr.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION BALTIMORE, MD 21235-0001 March 5, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HONORABLE GREGORY H. FRIEDMAN INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SUBJECT: Department of Energy Peer Review for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2009 The attached report presents the results of our external quality control review of the Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General, Office of Audit Services. Your response to the draft report is included as Appendix B. We thank you and your staff for the assistance and cooperation provided during our review. If you have any questions or would like to discuss the report, please call me, or have your staff contact Steven L. Schaeffer, Assistant Inspector General for Audit, at

48

NETL: 2010 - Carbon Sequestration Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carbon Sequestration Peer Review Carbon Sequestration Peer Review During March 15 - 19, 2010, a total of 16 projects from NETL's Carbon Sequestration Program were peer reviewed....

49

NETL: 2013 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs NETL: 2013 - Carbon Capture Peer Review Carbon Storage Peer Review During October 22 - 26, 2012, a total of 16 projects...

50

NETL: 2011 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs Advanced Energy Systems Peer Review Advanced Energy Systems Peer Review During April 23 - 27, 2012, a total of 16 projects...

51

MELCOR Peer Review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code that models the progression of severe accidents in light water reactor nuclear power plants. The newest version of MELCOR is Version 1.8.1, July 1991. MELCOR development has reached the point that the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission sponsored a broad technical review by recognized experts to determine or confirm the technical adequacy of the code for the serious and complex analyses it is expected to perform. For this purpose, an eight-member MELCOR Peer Review Committee was organized. The Committee has completed its review of the MELCOR code: the review process and findings of the MELCOR Peer Review Committee are documented in this report. The Committee has determined that recommendations in five areas are appropriate: (1) MELCOR numerics, (2) models missing from MELCOR Version 1.8.1, (3) existing MELCOR models needing revision, (4) the need for expanded MELCOR assessment, and (5) documentation.

Boyack, B.E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Dhir, V.K. [Santa Monica, CA. (United States); Gieseke, J.A. [Battelle, Columbus, OH (United States); Haste, T.J. [AEA Technology, Winfrith (United Kingdom); Kenton, M.A. [Gabor, Kenton and Associates, Inc., Westmont, IL (United States); Khatib-Rahbar, M. [Energy Research, Inc., Rockville, MD (United States); Leonard, M.T. [Science Applications International Corp., Wolfheze (Netherlands); Viskanta, R. [Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN (United States). Heat Transfer Lab.

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

52

Energy Storage Systems 2005 Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on October 20, 2005 in San Francisco, CA. The agenda and ESS program overview presentation are below.

53

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage...

54

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted...

55

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Day 1, Session 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update...

56

Energy Storage Systems 2009 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 Peer Review 09 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2009 Peer Review The DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted an annual peer review in Seattle, WA on October 8, 2009. The 1-day conference included welcoming remarks from OE's Imre Gyuk as well as a program overview from John Boyes of Sandia National Laboratories and 11 presentations on individual projects. The agenda, program overview, and project presentations are available below. ESS 2009 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - DOE-ESS Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Long Island Bus NaS Battery Energy Storage Project - Steve Eckroad, EPRI.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Development of an Integrated Power Controller Based on HT SOI and SiC - Joseph Henfling, SNL.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Large Format Carbon Enhanced VRLA Battery Test

57

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW FINAL REPORT  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT 2/21/06 Background Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) signed a cooperative agreement with DOE on 9/30/04 to develop a novel gasifier concept, which is expected to improve the availability and efficiency of gasification-based power plants, and to reduce plant capital and operations costs. On 12/21/05, PWR submitted a proposal to continue development of their gasifier into the next phase. On January 24, 2006, a peer review was performed to review the work that PWR has done to date, their technical approach for future development, and to assess the potential benefit of the PWR gasifier and feed system technologies over state-of-the art coal gasification. The peer reviewers also evaluated a DOE analysis of the PWR refractory, and a DOE system study comparing the

58

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review 6 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The agenda and ESS program overview are available below. Day 1 morning session presentations Day 1 afternoon session presentations Day 2 morning session presentations Day 2 afternoon session presentations ESS 2006 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - ESS Program Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications

59

CONTAIN independent peer review  

SciTech Connect

The CONTAIN code was developed by Sandia National Laboratories under the sponsorship of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to provide integrated analyses of containment phenomena. It is used to predict nuclear reactor containment loads, radiological source terms, and associated physical phenomena for a range of accident conditions encompassing both design-basis and severe accidents. The code`s targeted applications include support for containment-related experimental programs, light water and advanced light water reactor plant analysis, and analytical support for resolution of specific technical issues such as direct containment heating. The NRC decided that a broad technical review of the code should be performed by technical experts to determine its overall technical adequacy. For this purpose, a six-member CONTAIN Peer Review Committee was organized and a peer review as conducted. While the review was in progress, the NRC issued a draft ``Revised Severe Accident Code Strategy`` that incorporated revised design objectives and targeted applications for the CONTAIN code. The committee continued its effort to develop findings relative to the original NRC statement of design objectives and targeted applications. However, the revised CONTAIN design objectives and targeted applications. However, the revised CONTAIN design objectives and targeted applications were considered by the Committee in assigning priorities to the Committee`s recommendations. The Committee determined some improvements are warranted and provided recommendations in five code-related areas: (1) documentation, (2) user guidance, (3) modeling capability, (4) code assessment, and (5) technical assessment.

Boyack, B.E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Corradini, M.L. [Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States). Nuclear Engineering Dept.; Denning, R.S. [Battelle Memorial Inst., Columbus, OH (United States); Khatib-Rahbar, M. [Energy Research Inc., Rockville, MD (United States); Loyalka, S.K. [Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO (United States); Smith, P.N. [AEA Technology, Dorchester (United Kingdom). Winfrith Technology Center

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

60

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Peer Review 7 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. The agenda and ESS program overview presentation are below. Presentation categories Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Program Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

ESS 2012 Peer Review - ARPA-E Storage Overview - Mark Johnson, DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Storage Overview Storage Overview September 26, 2012 DOE Energy Storage Review Mark Johnson Advanced Research Projects Agency * Energy 2006 Rising Above the Gathering Storm (National Academies) 2007 America COMPETES Act ARPA-E Launched at National Academies: April 27, 2009 First Funding Announcement: May 2, 2009 Innovation based on science and engineering will be primary driver of our future prosperity & security 2009 ARRA ($400M appropriated) A Brief History of of ARPA-E FY11 Budget CR ($180M appropriated) FY12 Budget ($275M appropriated) 2 Advanced Research Projects Agency * Energy Venture Capital and Small Businesses Private Equity/Capital & Large Corporations Government Procurement Office of Science Applied Energy Offices Technology Maturity

62

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer...

63

Peer Review 2012 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

12 Peer Review 2012 September 30, 2012 Subject: Department of Energy, Peer Review for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2012 Reviewer: Treasury Inspector General for Tax...

64

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon 6 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Energy Storage and Wyoming Wind Power - Mindi Farber de Anda, SAIC.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Hybrid Generation Simulator - David Trujillo, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Modular Energy Storage Benefit and Cost for Three Emerging Value Propositions - Susan Schoenung, Longitude 122 West.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Sprint - Kevin Kenny.pdf

65

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning 6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 morning session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - EESAT 2007 Conference Information - Georgianne Peek, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Ultracapacitor EnergyBridge UPS - Chris McKay, Northern Power.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Flywheel-based Frequency Regulation Demonstration Projects - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Design of the FESS 20MW Frequency Regulation Plant -

66

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 1 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Laboratory Scale FACTS Conroller Development - Mariesa Crow, U Missouri, Rolla.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - 100kW Low Cost Energy Storage Inverter - Larry Rinehart, Rinehart Motions.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - ETO Light Power Converter for FACTS & Energy Storage Applications - Alex Huang, NCSU.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-based Power Converter

67

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

68

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Energy Storage Program Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage Program Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

69

FEMP Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Panel Report Panel Report September 20-21, 2005 FEMP PEER REVIEW PANEL Paul DeCotis, Chair New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Floyd E. Barwig Iowa Energy Center Richard S. Brent Solar Turbines, Inc. Bruce Gross Dominion Federal Corporation Kenneth L. James Pacific Gas and Electric Company Meg Matt The Matt Group Richard A. Morgan Morgan Marketing Partners Francis J. Murray, Jr. Energy/Environmental Consultant Maria Papadakis James Madison University Polly N. Shaw Consultant Susan E. Stratton Energy Center of Wisconsin James J. Winebrake, Ph.D. Rochester Institute of Technology David B. Zabetakis David B. Zabetakis, LLC November 4, 2005 Mr. Rick Khan, Program Manager Federal Energy Management Program U.S. Department of Energy

70

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects The Renaissance Hotel Washington, D.C. September 2012 Presented by Dan Borneo SAND Document 5312608 SAND2012-7453 C...

71

NETL: 2011 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carbon Capture Peer Review During July 18 - 21, 2011, a total of 16 projects from NETL's Innovations for Existing Plants and Carbon Sequestration Programs were peer reviewed....

72

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARPA-E project presentations from the first poster session on Day 1, chaired by DOE's Mark Johnson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Dispatchable Wind--Wind Power on Demand - Ian Lawson, General Compression ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel Regenerative Fuel Cells based on Anion Exchange Membranes - Katherine Ayers, Proton Onsite ESS 2012 Peer Review - Low Cost, High-Energy Density Flywheel Storage Grid

73

2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations 2 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available 2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis Presentations from two peer reviews in September are now available. The Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology Solutions (CERTS) Transmission Reliability R&D Load as a Resource (LAAR) Program peer review included five presentations on September 20, 2012, hosted by DOE at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. DOE's Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on September 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included nine sessions and two poster sessions. Addthis Related Articles 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available

74

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review Planning  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Planning Planning Woman participating in a peer review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) begins the peer review planning process by analyzing the purpose of the funds to be distributed. Because each agency's needs are different, ORISE then designs and manages a flexible, scientific peer review process that can be modified based on a sponsor's regulatory, policy and operational requirements. ORISE's existing tools and systems, and knowledge of reviewing proposals from a government agency perspective, are helping to promote the quality and credibility of scientific information and funded research. ORISE's peer review planning process ensures each objective review is completed on schedule, within budget and with a high degree of process integrity.

75

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Energy International Energy Storage Program Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage Program Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to international energy storage programs are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - DOE-CEC Energy Storage Program FY07 Projects - Daniel Borneo, SNL.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Joint NYSERDA-DOE Energy Storage Initiative Projects

76

Published Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Published Peer Reviews Published Peer Reviews Published Peer Reviews Peer Review Agenda Vehicle Technologies Annual Merit Review Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 (pdf) Peer Review Plan for influential scientific assessment entitled, "Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1." (pdf) Peer Review Plan for Highly Influential Scientific Assessment entitled, "Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications" (pdf) Peer Review Plan for Highly Influential Scientific Assessment entitled, "Synthesis and Assessment Report on Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario

77

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 afternoon 2 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Energy Storage and Wyoming Wind Power - Mindi Farber de Anda, SAIC.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Hybrid Generation Simulator - David Trujillo, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Modular Energy Storage Benefit and Cost for Three Emerging Value Propositions - Susan Schoenung, Longitude 122 West.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Sprint - Kevin Kenny.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Emerson Network Power - Paul Misar.pdf

78

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 morning 1 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 1 morning session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - NAS Battery Performance at Charleston, WV - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Evaluation of the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative System for Energy Storage Potential - Abbas Akhil, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Plant - Bob Haug, ISEPA.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Superconducting Flywheel Development - Phil Johnson, Boeing.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Bipolar NiMH Battery Development and Testing - James

79

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rulemaking Rulemaking Peer Review Report - Supporting Documentation Submitted Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy March 2007 Table of Contents PROJECT ABSTRACTS ................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................ 16 SLIDE PRESENTATIONS ON JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .................................................. 104 PEER REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM.................................................................. 201 PEER REVIEW AGENDA JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .........................................................

80

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Session Morning Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the Day 1 morning session are below. Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC - Tom Rizy, ORNL 2012 SG Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Energy Surety, Microgrids - Mike Hightower, SNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Grid Standards and Conformance Testing - Tom Basso, NREL 2012 SG Peer Review - GridLAB-D and Integrated T&D Control - David Chassin,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from Day 2 morning session are below. Moderator: Merrill Smith, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ron Melton, Battelle Memorial Institute 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LADWP Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Project - Mukhlesur Bhuiyan, City of Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: AEP Ohio gridSMART Demonstration

82

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer...

83

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. National lab project presentations from the first poster session on Day 1, chaired by DOE's Mark Johnson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Metrics for Storage and Pre-Standards Analyses - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Oahu Energy Storage Study - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Soowhan Kim, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Engineered Gate Oxides for Wide Bandgap Semiconductor MOSFETs - Jon Ihlefeld, SNL

84

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews Peer Reviews SMART GRID PROGRAM 2012 Agenda and Presentations, San Diego, CA, June 7-8, 2012 2010 Agenda and Presentations, Denver, CO, November 2-4, 2010 2008 Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration Agenda, Red Bank, NJ, October 29-30, 2008 TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY 2013 Reliability & Markets Agenda and Presentations, Ithaca, NY, August 6-7, 2013 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, June 27-28, 2013 2012 Load as a Resource Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, September 20, 2012 2012 Reliability & Markets Agenda and Presentations, Ithaca, NY, August 7-8, 2012 2012 Advanced Applications Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, June 12-13, 2012 2010 Agenda and Presentations, and Final Report, Alexandria, VA,

85

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Electronics Power Electronics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to power electronics are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - StatCom with Energy Storage to Smooth Intermittent Power Output of Wind Farms - Mesut Baran, NC State.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Cyber-Physical Systems Distributed Control - Mariesa

86

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility & Commercial Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to utility, commercial, and rail applications of advanced energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Application of Large-Scale ESS in AEP - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Park - Kent Holst, ISEP.pdf

87

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Innovations in ESS Innovations in ESS Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to innovations in energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics ESS 2007 Peer Review - Evaluation of Lead-Carbon Storage Devices for Utility Applications - Enders Dickinson, MeadWestvaco.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - High Voltage Electrochemical Capacitor - David

88

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality...

89

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. University project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Strategies for Liquid-Anode Alkali Batteries of High Energy Density Operating at 0 to 100 C - C Austen Angell, AZ State ESS 2012 Peer Review - Iron Based Flow Batteries for Low Cost Grid Level Energy Storage - Jesse Wainright, Case Western Reserve

90

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARRA project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - 20 MW Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Implementation of Community ESS for Grid Support - Haukur Asgeirsson, Detroit Edison ESS 2012 Peer Review - Notrees Wind Storage - Jeff Gates, Duke Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Compressed Air Energy Storage - Robert Booth,

91

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Reviews in June and July Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July June 12, 2012 - 9:31am Addthis The Department of Energy will hold peer reviews for the Real Time Reliability Management program and the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) program this summer. Peer reviews are an opportunity for energy sector stakeholders to hear updates on ongoing and upcoming projects, provide feedback to program managers, and network with experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories. June 12-13, 2012: Real Time Reliability Management (RTGRM) The Transmission Reliability R&D Program will conduct a peer review of the Real Time Grid Reliability Management RTGRM is part of DOE's Transmission Reliability R&D Program and includes projects in support of the North

92

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. SBIR project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Higher Power Motor for ARPA-E Flywheel - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Acid Based Blend Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries - Alan Cisar, Lynntech ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage

93

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARRA project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - 20 MW Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Implementation of Community ESS for Grid Support - Haukur Asgeirsson, Detroit Edison ESS 2012 Peer Review - Notrees Wind Storage - Jeff Gates, Duke Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Compressed Air Energy Storage - Robert Booth,

94

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July June 12, 2012 - 9:31am Addthis The Department of Energy will hold peer reviews for the Real Time Reliability Management program and the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) program this summer. Peer reviews are an opportunity for energy sector stakeholders to hear updates on ongoing and upcoming projects, provide feedback to program managers, and network with experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories. June 12-13, 2012: Real Time Reliability Management (RTGRM) The Transmission Reliability R&D Program will conduct a peer review of the Real Time Grid Reliability Management RTGRM is part of DOE's Transmission Reliability R&D Program and includes projects in support of the North

95

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial 7 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to utility, commercial, and rail applications of advanced energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Application of Large-Scale ESS in AEP - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Park - Kent Holst, ISEP.pdf

96

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. Power Electronics (PE) Systems presentations are available below. ESPE 2008 Peer Review - High Power Density Silicon Carbide Power Electronic

97

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. Energy Storage Systems (ESS) presentations are available below. ESPE 2008 Peer Review - EAC Energy Storage Subcommittee - Brad Roberts, S&C

98

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations are available through individual session links and the agenda is below. Presentations: Day 1: June 7 Morning session | Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE Afternoon sessions | Moderators: Eric Lightner and Merrill Smith, DOE Day 2: June 8 Morning session | Moderator: Merrill Smith, DOE Smart Grid Panel Discussion | Moderator: Lee Krevat, SDG&E First afternoon session | Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE Second afternoon session | Moderator: Eric Lightner, DOE

99

2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Information Center » Library » Peer Reviews » 2005 Electric Information Center » Library » Peer Reviews » 2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations 2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations Electric Distribution R&D FY05 Annual Program and Peer Review Meeting April 19 & 20, 2005 Georgia Tech Conference Center Atlanta, Georgia Agenda (PDF 96 KB) Plenary Sessions Welcome and Our New Office of Electricity and Energy Assurance - Kevin Kolevar, DOE Overview of the Electric Distribution R&D - Eric Lightner, DOE Presentation (PDF 883 KB). GridWise Architectural Council - Rik Drummond, Drummond Group, Inc. Presentation (PDF 1.5 MB). Advanced Grid Application Consortium (GridApp) - James Crane, Exelon Corp. Presentation (PDF 1.6 MB). Session 1: Monitoring and Load Management Technologies

100

An algorithm to determine peer-reviewers  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The peer-review process is the most widely accepted certification mechanism for officially accepting the written results of researchers within the scientific community. An essential component of peer-review is the identification of competent referees ... Keywords: co-authorship networks, peer-review process

Marko A. Rodriguez; Johan Bollen

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report from the Peer Review Panel Report from the Peer Review Panel on activities within the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Team Members: Kathryn Newcomer, The George Washington University (Chair) Irwin Feller, The Pennsylvania State University (Retired) Stephanie Shipman, Government Accountability Office Kathleen Sedlak O'Brien, Environmental Protection Agency Faith Lambert, EERE Final Report February 1, 2008 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) within the U.S. Department of Energy asked a panel of experts with relevant knowledge to review the evaluation activities of the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit (PAE) within EERE's Office of Planning, Budget and

102

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program...

103

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

104

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review for State and Federal Agencies  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE) supports federal agencies-such as the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), U.S. Department of Homeland Security...

105

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel A report for the DOE on the Yucca Mountain Project. Final Report...

106

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. The final agenda and welcome presentation are below. Presentations

107

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. The final agenda and welcome presentation are below. Presentations

108

Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review With mounting evidence suggesting an increased probability that malicious attacks may be launched against energy control systems, there is a critical need to understand specific cyber vulnerabilities and corresponding mitigation strategies. This need is being addressed by SCADA/ Energy Management System (EMS) Cyber Security Assessments conducted at the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) facility at INL and at on-site field installations of control systems. Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review More Documents & Publications DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan DOE National SCADA Test Bed Program Multi-Year Plan Vulnerability Analysis of Energy Delivery Control Systems - 2011

109

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Software Engineering Institute Software Engineering Institute Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Software Engineering Institute National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations from Carnegie Mellon University's Software Engineering

110

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Visualization and Modeling Visualization and Modeling Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Visualization and Modeling National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Visualization and Modeling are below.

111

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Conservation Standards Rulemaking Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report Prepared Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy February 2007 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 4 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 6 2. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................... 6 3. SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 7

112

Convergent contemporary software peer review practices  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Software peer review is practiced on a diverse set of software projects that have drastically different settings, cultures, incentive systems, and time pressures. In an effort to characterize and understand these differences we examine two Google-led ... Keywords: Empirical Software Engineering, Inspection, Open source software, Peer code review, Software firms

Peter C. Rigby; Christian Bird

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 28, 2012.

114

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Program Overview - Eric Lightner, DOE_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - University of HI Renewable and Distributed Systems - Jay Griffen, Univ. of HI.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Dennis Summer, Fort Collins_0.pdf

115

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The...

116

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Peer Review Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum...

117

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secure Communications Secure Communications Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Secure Communications National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Secure Communications are below. CEDS 2010 Peer Review - Cryptographic Trust Management - Mark Hadley,

118

NETL: 2010 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (AIGCC) Peer Review Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (AIGCC)...

119

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Home Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...

120

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the...

122

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems...

123

2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available 2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis...

124

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis...

125

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 -...

126

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 -...

127

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Dan Borneo, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA ESS 2012 Peer Review - Life Cycle Testing and Evaluation of Energy Storage Devices - Summer Ferreira, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Test Pad - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance

128

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Dan Borneo, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA ESS 2012 Peer Review - Life Cycle Testing and Evaluation of Energy Storage Devices - Summer Ferreira, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Test Pad - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance

129

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_SAR.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

a Peer Review of a "Synthesis and Assessment Report on a Peer Review of a "Synthesis and Assessment Report on Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario Development and Application" Pursuant to Section V of the "Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under the authority of the Information Quality Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-554), the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) announces a plan for a peer review of its Synthesis and Assessment Report 2.1 entitled "Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario Development and Application" The CCSP (see http://www.climatescience.gov for details) integrates federal

130

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-EPRI Energy Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA - Abbas Akhil, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EPRI Electricity DOE/EPRI Electricity Storage Handbook - in Collaboration with NRECA 28 September 2012 Abbas Akhil Dr. Imre Gyuk and the Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability support is gratefully acknowledged. Electricity Storage Handbook  Objective:  Compile a "how-to" Handbook that presents the technology capabilities, costs, tools and process for implementing electricity storage projects in the US.  Approach:  Publish an open domain DOE Electricity Storage Handbook in partnership with EPRI  Collaboration with NRECA - leverage their knowledge base and reaches the large co-operative utility base  Handbook draws from and updates large body of work of prior work 2 Handbook Chapters  Introduction

131

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-OE FY12 Electrical DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects The Renaissance Hotel Washington, D.C. September 2012 Presented by Dan Borneo SAND Document 5312608 SAND2012-7453 C Acknowledgements I would like to thank the DOE's Office of Electricity and Dr. Imre Gyuk, Program Manager of the Electrical Energy Storage Program, for their support and funding of the Energy Storage Demonstration Projects. 2 EES Emerging Technology Demonstrations Presentation Outline  Project Overview  Problem Statement  Approach  Current Status  Path Forward - Next Steps  Geographical Representation of Projects  Summary Chart of Projects  Brief Descriptions of Individual Projects  Concluding Remarks 3 EES Demonstrations Project Overview  Problem Statement

132

VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS PROGRAM AGENDA Marriott Crystal City at Reagan National Airport 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway Arlington, Virginia 22202 October 18, 2006 7:30 - 8:30 a.m. Continental Breakfast Times CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTROL SYSTEMS SECURITY 8:30 - 8:45 Introduction - Phil Overholt philip.overholt@hq.doe.gov Introduction - Hank Kenchington henry.kenchington@hq.doe.gov 8:45 - 9:15 Overview of Reliability and Markets Bob Thomas, PSERC/Cornell Univ. rjt1@cornell.edu Cyber Security Assessments of Control Systems in the Energy Sector Bob Hill, INL robert.hill@inl.gov 9:15 - 9:45 Market Monitoring Tools Bernard Lesieutre, LBNL bclesieutre@lbnl.gov Cyber Security Assessments of Inter Control Center Communications Protocol Implementations

133

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_CCSP.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Peer Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program the Peer Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Report entitled 'Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications' Pursuant to Section V of the "Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under the authority of the Information Quality Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-554), the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) announces a plan for the peer review of its Synthesis and Assessment Report entitled 'Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications'. The CCSP is an interagency research, planning, and coordinating entity that integrates federal research on climate and global change, as sponsored by thirteen federal agencies and overseen by the Office of Science and Technology

134

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Ross Guttromson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Na-ion Intercalation Electrodes for Na-ion Battery - Jun Liu, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Carbon Enhanced VRLA Batteries - David Enos, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Improved Properties of Nanocomposites for Flywheel Applications - Tim Boyle, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Magnetic Composites for Flywheel Energy Storage -

135

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Tony Martino, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - CAES Geo Performance for Natural Gas and Salt Reservoirs and TMH Response of GSFs - Payton Gardner, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Thermoelectrochemical Energy Storage - Nick Hudak, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Component Research for Redox Flow Batteries - Tom Zawodzinski, ORNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Nitrogen-Oxygen Battery for Large Scale Energy Storage - Frank Delnick, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium-based Battery Development - Dave Ingersoll,

136

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Program Overview - Eric Lightner, DOE_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - University of HI Renewable and Distributed Systems - Jay Griffen, Univ. of HI.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Dennis Summer, Fort Collins_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Integrated & Automated DG Technologies Demo - Roger

137

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Ross Guttromson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Na-ion Intercalation Electrodes for Na-ion Battery - Jun Liu, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Carbon Enhanced VRLA Batteries - David Enos, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Improved Properties of Nanocomposites for Flywheel Applications - Tim Boyle, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Magnetic Composites for Flywheel Energy Storage -

138

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Day 3, Day 3, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 3, chaired by PNNL's Landis Kannberg, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Membranes for VRFB - Cy Fujimoto, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Materials for Flow Batteries - Travis Anderson, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Redox Flow Battery Prototype Development - Vincent Sprenkle, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Battery

139

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Ray Byrne, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - National Assessment of Energy Storage for Grid Balancing and Arbitrage - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-EPRI Energy Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA - Abbas Akhil, SNL More Documents & Publications

140

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Ray Byrne, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - National Assessment of Energy Storage for Grid Balancing and Arbitrage - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-EPRI Energy Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA - Abbas Akhil, SNL More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

2012 SG Peer Review - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review Meeting DOE - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project S. S. (Mani) Venkata Alstom Grid June 7, 2012 December 2008 DOE Integrated Smart...

142

DOE Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review 2007 Review 2007 AWA Facility Update, High Gradient Wakefield Generation, and Future Upgrades Manoel Conde, Sergey Antipov, Felipe Franchini, Wei Gai, Feng Gao, Chunguang Jing, Richard Konecny, Wanming Liu, Jidong Long, John Power, Haitao Wang, Zikri Yusof Argonne Wakefield Accelerator Group High Energy Physics Division April 25 - 27, 2007 2 Outline Description of AWA Facililty. Wakefield structures built and tested. Measurements and simulations. List of next experiments to be performed. Plans for Facility upgrades. 3 AWA Drive Beamline Drive Gun Linac & Steering Coils Quads Wakefield Structure Experimental Chambers 4.5 m GV GV YAG1 YAG2 Spectrometer YAG5 Dump/ Faraday Cup Slits YAG4 YAG3 ICT1 ICT2 BPM Single bunch operation - Q=1-100 nC - Energy=15 MeV - High Current = 10 kAmp

143

Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications 23 August 2013 Oklahoma Biological Survey, ES Bridge and WF Frick. In Review. Energetics of and Abundant Aerial Insectivore: The Purple Martin aeroecology: exploring the movements of aerial fauna through radio-wave remote sensing. Biology Letters 8: 698

Kelly, Jeff

144

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. The full presentations are available below. Presentation summaries are also available. 2012 R&M Peer Review - Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs 2012 R&M Peer Review - Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch - Pravin Varaiya 2012 R&M Peer Review - Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman 2012 R&M Peer Review - Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework - Hsiao-Dong Chiang 2012 R&M Peer Review - Essence of Structure Preserving Network Reductions -

145

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer reviewed by qualified specialists before it is disseminated by the federal government. We published a proposed Bulletin on September 15, 2003. Based on public comments, we published a revised proposal for additional comment on April 28, 2004. We are now finalizing the April version, with minor revisions responsive to the public's comments. The purpose of the Bulletin is to enhance the quality and credibility of the government's scientific information. We recognize that different types of peer review are appropriate for different types of information. Under this Bulletin, agencies are granted broad

146

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Vulnerability and Instrusion Detection are below.

147

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Vulnerability and Instrusion Detection are below.

148

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Best Practices/Standards Development Best Practices/Standards Development Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practices/Standards Development National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Best Practices/Standards Development are below.

149

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs.

150

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Practice Design/Configuration Practice Design/Configuration Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practice Design/Configuration National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Best Practice Design/Configuration are below.

151

Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review » Fiscal Peer Review » Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review In November 2011, the Water Power Program held their Annual Peer Review Meeting in Alexandria, Virginia. The purpose of the meeting was to evaluate DOE-funded hydropower and marine and hydrokinetic R&D projects for their contribution to the mission and goals of the Water Power Program and to assess progress made against stated objectives. At the review, approximately 85 projects were presented, representing a DOE investment of over $100 million over the last few years. In addition to the formal review, this event was an excellent opportunity for the water power community to share ideas and solutions to address challenges facing the hydropower and marine and hydrokinetic energy industries.

152

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Stan Attcity, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel High Energy Density Dielectrics for Scalable Capacitor Needs - Geoff Brennecka, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Low Cost, Manufacturable High Voltage Power Module for ESS - Brandon Passmore, APEI ESS 2012 Peer Review - 6.5 kV Silicon Carbide Half-Bridge Power Switch Module for ESS Applications - John Hostetler, United Silicon Carbide ESS 2012 Peer Review - 15 kV Phase Leg Power Modules with SiC Devices -

153

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 1, chaired by Bill Capp of Grid Storage Consulting, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Solution for Smart Grid Renewable Energy Applications - Sheri Nevins, Raytheon & Ron Moss, EnerVault ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Controls for Grid Stability - Ray Byrne, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Secondary Use of Vehicle Batteries in Power Systems

154

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 1, chaired by NETL's Ron Staubly, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wind Firming EnergyFarm - Tom Stepien, Primus Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Grid-Scale Energy Storage Demo for Ancillary Services Using UltraBattery - John Wood, Ecoult ESS 2012 Peer Review - PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting - Steve Willard, PNM ESS 2012 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Sodium Ion Battery for Grid Level Applications - Ted Wiley, Aquion Energy

155

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 1, Session 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 1, chaired by Bill Capp of Grid Storage Consulting, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Solution for Smart Grid Renewable Energy Applications - Sheri Nevins, Raytheon & Ron Moss, EnerVault ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Controls for Grid Stability - Ray Byrne, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Secondary Use of Vehicle Batteries in Power Systems

156

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review 2 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations are available through the individual session links. The agenda and participant list are available below. Presentations June 12 - Day 1: Session I, Session II, Session III, Session IV, Session V June 13 - Day 2: Session VI, Session VII 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Agenda 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Participant List More Documents & Publications 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2

157

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Converters - Marcelo Schupbach, APEI.pdf ESPE 2008 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-Based Power Converter System - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf ESPE 2008 Peer Review - SiC Power...

158

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applications - Alex Huang, NCSU.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-based Power Converter System - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Optically...

159

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United Silicon Carbide ESS 2012 Peer Review - 15 kV Phase Leg Power Modules with SiC Devices - Ranbir Singh, GeneSiC Semiconductor ESS 2012 Peer Review - Experimental...

160

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports on Facebook Tweet about...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4,...

162

How important tasks are performed: peer review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The advancement of various fields of science depends on the actions of individual scientists via the peer review process. The referees' work patterns and stochastic nature of decision making both relate to the particular features of refereeing and to the universal aspects of human behavior. Here, we show that the time a referee takes to write a report on a scientific manuscript depends on the final verdict. The data is compared to a model, where the review takes place in an ongoing competition of completing an important composite task with a large number of concurrent ones - a Deadline -effect. In peer review human decision making and task completion combine both long-range predictability and stochastic variation due to a large degree of ever-changing external "friction".

Hartonen, T; 10.1038/srep01679

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

163

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Presentation Summaries |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review - Presentation Summaries Review - Presentation Summaries 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Presentation Summaries The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentation summaries are available below. The full presentations are also available. 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Transmission Investment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch - Pravin Varaiya 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework - Hsiao-Dong Chiang 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Essence of Structure Preserving Network

164

ORAU: Scientific and Technical Peer Review Services fact sheet  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to ensure timely and fair assessments for informed funding decisions. Scientific and Technical Peer Review Services Unmatched Access to Scientific and Technical Reviewers ORAU is...

165

Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

emdoe.gov emdoe.gov Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management (ASCEM) Independent Peer Review and Assessment Team Report Technology Innovation and Development Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy September 15, 2010 Table of Contents Transmission Memorandum . . . . . . . . 1 ASCEM IPRA Team . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Findings and Observations . . . . . . . . . 5 Appendices 1: Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2: Biographical Information . . . . . 8 3: ASCEM IPRA CHARTER . . . . . 10 4: Conflict of Interest Form . . . . . 16 i Intentional Blank Page

166

2005 Conference Proceedings: SECA Core Technology Program Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program Peer Review Program Peer Review October 25-26, 2005 Table of Contents Disclaimer Papers and Presentations Materials Modeling & Simulation Balance of Plant Cell Components Breakout Sections Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government or any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

167

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 First Afternoon Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

First Afternoon First Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 First Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the first Day 2 afternoon session are below. Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LIPA Smart Energy Corridor Project - Ming Mui, LIPA 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Enhanced Demand and Distribution Management Regional Demonstration - Craig Miller, NRECA 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: NSTAR Automated Mater Reading Based Dynamic Pricing - Douglas Horton, NSTAR Electric & Gas

168

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Second Afternoon Session  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Afternoon Second Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Second Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the second Day 2 afternoon session are below. Moderator: Eric Lightner, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Bill Becker, Spirae 2012 SG Peer Review - Interoperability of Demand Response Resources in New York - Andre Wellington, ConEd NY 2012 SG Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Robert Boehm, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas

169

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. The agenda & project list is below. Presentations Energy Storage Systems (ESS) presentations Power Electronics (PE) Systems presentations

170

NETL: Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews Coal and Power Systems Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs NETL is conducting a series of independent Peer Reviews of its Strategic Center for Coal Technology Programs in accordance with Departmental guidelines. Using a standard set of selection criteria, each technology program selects between 15 and 20 projects to be peer reviewed that represent the program's project portfolio and a significant portion of their fiscal year budget. Selected projects undergo a rigorous review during which the Principal Investigators summarize the status of their research, accomplishments, and future planned activities to an independent panel of experts. Projects are evaluated using a standard set of metrics to assess the progress of the Project Team towards achieving the Statements of Project Objectives as well as specific project milestones of the research. Following the Peer Review, NETL uses the results to guide and redirect the projects, as appropriate, underscoring NETL's commitment to funding and managing a portfolio of high-quality research.

171

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A consensus peer review of the current technical basis and the planned experimental and modeling program for the prediction of the long-term performance of waste package materials being considered for use in a proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A Compilation of Special Topic Reports Wastepackagematerials_PPRP_final.pdf Evaluation of the Final Report: Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Panel Multi-Purpose_Canister_System_Evaluation.pdf More Documents & Publications Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion Cracking/Fatigue Modeling for Light Water

172

Commercial Lighting Solutions, Webtool Peer Review Report  

SciTech Connect

The Commercial Lighting Solutions (CLS) project directly supports the U.S. Department of Energys Commercial Building Energy Alliance efforts to design high performance buildings. CLS creates energy efficient best practice lighting designs for widespread use, and they are made available to users via an interactive webtool that both educates and guides the end user through the application of the Lighting Solutions. This report summarizes the peer review of the beta version of the CLS webtool, which contains retail box lighting solutions. The methodology for the peer review process included data collection (stakeholder input), analysis of the comments, and organization of the input into categories for prioritization of the comments against a set of criteria. Based on this process, recommendations were developed about which feedback should be addressed for the release of version 1.0 of the webtool at the Lightfair conference in New York City in May 2009. Due to the volume of data (~500 comments) the methodology for addressing the peer review comments was central to the success of the ultimate goal of improving the tool. The comments were first imported into a master spreadsheet, and then grouped and organized in several layers. Solutions to each comment were then rated by importance and feasibility to determine the practicality of resolving the concerns of the commenter in the short-term or long-term. The rating system was used as an analytical tool, but the results were viewed thoughtfully to ensure that they were not the sole the factor in determining which comments were recommended for near-term resolution. The report provides a list of the top ten most significant and relevant improvements that will be made within the webtool for version 1.0 as well as appendices containing the short-term priorities in additional detail. Peer review comments that are considered high priority by the reviewers and the CLS team but cannot be completed for Version 1.0 are listed as long-term recommendations.

Jones, Carol C.; Meyer, Tracy A.

2009-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

173

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Afternoon Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Afternoon Session 1 Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from Day 1 afternoon sessions are below. Moderators: Eric Lightner and Merrill Smith 2012 SG Peer Review - GridWise Architecture Council - Ron Melton, PNNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Expanded Demand Response Functionality - Graham Parker, PNNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project - Mani Venkata, Alstom 2012 SG Peer Review - Enhanced DMS Capabilities Supporting Distribution Network DER - Tristan Glenwright, Boeing

174

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through V) are available below. Session I: Dan Trudnowski, Ning Zhou, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session II: Brett Amidan, Bharat Bhargava, Ning Zhou Session III: Ken Martin, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session IV: Jeff Dagle, Jim Dyer, Joe Gracia, Joe Eto Session V: Joe Eto 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Measurement-Based Stability Assessment - Dan Trudnowski, U Montana 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Mode Meter Development - Ning

175

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Ben Hobbs (Johns Hopkins), Kameshwar Poolla (UC Berkeley) Session II: Ray Zimmerman (Cornell), Hsiao-Dong Chiang (Cornell) Session III: Shmuel Oren (UC Berkeley), Dan Tylavsky (U Arizona), Tom Overbye (U Illinois) Session IV: Lindsay Anderson (Cornell), HyungSeon Oh (Cornell) 2013 R&M Peer Review - Assessing Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs, Johns Hopkins 2013 R&M Peer Review - Coordinated Aggregation of Distributed Energy

176

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Presentations 2 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions VI and VII) are available below. Session VI: Yuri Makarov, Henry Huang, Jim McCalley Session VII: Carlos Martinez, Pete Sauer, Gil Tam 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Real-Time Wide-Area Montoring Tool Based on CELL Method - Yuri Makarov, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Modal Analysis for Grid Operations (MANGO) - Henry Huang, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - New Security Tools for Real-Time Operations - Jim McCalley, Iowa State 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Automatic Reliability Reports

177

FY2002 ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS PEER REVIEW AGENDA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM ANNUAL PEER REVIEW November 2-3, 2006 Washington Marriott Hotel, Washington, DC (USA) AGENDA Thursday, November 2, 2004 7:45 AM Continental Breakfast 8:30 Welcome and Overview - Dr. Imre Gyuk, DOE 8:40 DOE Perspective - DOE 9:00 ESS Program Overview - John Boyes, Sandia National Laboratories 9:20 NAS Battery Performance at Charleston, WV - Ali Nourai, AEP Corp. (Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy (DOE/ESS) through Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). 9:40 Evaluation of the Kauai Island Utility Co-operative System for Energy storage Potential - Abbas Akhil, Sandia National Laboratories (Funded by the Kauai Island Utility Co-0p). 10:00 Iowa Stored Energy Plant - Bob Haug, Iowa Stored Energy Plant Agency

178

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

179

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Visualization and Modeling National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

180

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best PracticesStandards Development National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practice DesignConfiguration National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

182

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Software Engineering Institute National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

183

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Secure Communications National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

184

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wind--Wind Power on Demand - Ian Lawson, General Compression ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel Regenerative Fuel Cells based on Anion Exchange Membranes - Katherine Ayers, Proton Onsite...

185

Geothermal Technologies Program 2010 Peer Review | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Number NA DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Geothermal Technologies Program 2010 Peer Review Citation Joe Iovenitti....

186

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LLC 35 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421-3102 www.TIAXLLC.com Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update...

187

Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's High Temperature Superconductivity (HTS) for...

188

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_SAR.doc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Publications Microsoft Word - PeerReviewCCSP.doc Microsoft Word - Cross Reference Matrix Introduction.doc DRAFT NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change...

189

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews | U.S...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

190

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 13 presentations over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentations are available through the links. The agenda and list of presentations are included below. The Reliability and Markets activity of the Transmission Reliability program researches, develops, and implements electricity infrastructure and market simulations that integrate economics and engineering principles. The activity helps to ensure electric reliability, while also improving the efficiency and economics of market operations. Day 1: August 6 Session I Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty, Ben Hobbs,

191

2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fact Sheets Meetings & Events Electric Distribution R&D FY05 Annual Program and Peer Review Meeting April 19 & 20, 2005 Georgia Tech Conference Center Atlanta, Georgia Agenda...

192

Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Software peer review has proven to be a successful technique in open source software (OSS) development. In contrast to industry, where reviews are typically assigned to specific individuals, changes are broadcast to hundreds of potentially interested ... Keywords: case studies, grounded theory, open source software, peer review

Peter C. Rigby; Margaret-Anne Storey

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

peer  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 AUDIT REPORT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S PEER REVIEW PRACTICES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES APRIL 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Acting Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION : Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Peer Review Practices" BACKGROUND Fulfilling the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 has presented Federal science agencies with the challenge of defining ways to quantify and evaluate the outcomes of research. Measuring research program performance is particularly important for the Department of Energy because of its substantial investment (approximately $7 billion in Fiscal Year 1996) in research and development

194

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2011 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 9-13, 2011 in Arlington, Virginia

Satypal, S.

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t L e s s d e p e n d e n c e o n f o r e i g n o i l t o d a y, a n d t r a n s i t i o n t o a p e t r o l e u m - f r e e , e m i s s i o n s - f r e e v e h i c l e t o m o r r o w . F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m Heavy veHicle SyStemS OptimizatiOn merit review and peer evaluatiOn Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2006 Department of Energy (DOE) Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Peer Review Meeting, held April 18-20, 2006 at Argonne National Laboratory in suburban Chicago, Illinois. The goal of this document is to provide the reader with a summary of the comments and scores from expert reviewers from industry and government on these systems optimization projects.

196

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report (Book)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The fiscal year (FY) 2013 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), in conjunction with DOE's Vehicle Technologies Office AMR, was held from May 13-16, 2013, at the Crystal City Marriott and Crystal Gateway Marriott in Arlington, Virginia. This report is a summary of comments by AMR peer reviewers about the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE).

Not Available

2013-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

197

Assessment of Financial Savings from Peer Reviews of In-Progress Projects: A Case Study from the Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Results of a study to assess the financial savings to the Department of Energys (DOE) Hydrogen Program due to decisions made from peer reviews.

198

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Page 1 of 3 Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Page 1 of 3 U.S. Department of Energy Smart Grid R&D Peer Review San Diego Gas & Electric Energy Innovation Center 4760 Clairemont Mesa Blvd San Diego, California June 7-8, 2012 AGENDA Thursday, June 7, 2012 8:00 am Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 am - 8:40 am Welcome David Geier, Vice President Electric Operations, San Diego Gas & Electric 8:40 am - 9:00 am OE's R&D Division/Smart Grid R&D Program Hank Kenchington/Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy Moderator - Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy 9:00 am - 9:30 am Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC Tom Rizy, ORNL 9:30 am - 10:00 am CERTS Microgrid Test Bed Joe Eto, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

199

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2005 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2005 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

200

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2006 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2006 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Presentations 1 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through V) are available below. Session I: Dan Trudnowski, Ning Zhou, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session II: Brett Amidan, Bharat Bhargava, Ning Zhou Session III: Ken Martin, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session IV: Jeff Dagle, Jim Dyer, Joe Gracia, Joe Eto Session V: Joe Eto 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Measurement-Based Stability Assessment - Dan Trudnowski, U Montana 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Mode Meter Development - Ning Zhou, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Oscillation Monitoring System

202

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

203

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

204

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2009 Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

205

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 14, 2010 FY10-42 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-Oak Ridge Associated Universities has appointed Tony Lester as director of the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education's program focused on scientific peer review. Lester has been serving in this role in an acting capacity since September 2009. Tony Lester Tony Lester In his role, Lester manages a research peer review capability that coordinates the use of independent, expert reviewers to determine the scientific technical feasibility of proposals submitted in response to government agency research needs. His team works closely with the federal government to provide liaison, consultation and operations support during the planning and execution of customers' grant management cycles. The

206

Heavy Vehicle Materials Program 2005 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT HEAVY VEHICLE MATERIALS PROGRAM Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 2005 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Heavy Vehicle Materials Program Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, held September 13-15, 2005 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The goal of this document is to provide the reader with a summary of the comments and scores from expert reviewers from industry and government on these Materials Technologies projects.

207

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below. Session V: Ken Martin (EPG), Jim Thorp (Virginia Tech), Scott Ghiocel (RPI), Mani Venkatasubramanian (WSU) Session VI: Pete Sauer (U Illinois), Carlos Martinez (ASR), Gil Tam (EPG) 2013 TR Review - Data Validation & Conditioning - Ken Martin, EPG 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Data Conditioning and Validation - Jim Thorp, Virginia Tech 2013 TR Review - PMU-based Voltage Stability - Scott Ghiocel, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2013 TR Review - Oscillation Monitoring System - Mani Venkatasubramanian,

208

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below. Session V: Ken Martin (EPG), Jim Thorp (Virginia Tech), Scott Ghiocel (RPI), Mani Venkatasubramanian (WSU) Session VI: Pete Sauer (U Illinois), Carlos Martinez (ASR), Gil Tam (EPG) 2013 TR Review - Data Validation & Conditioning - Ken Martin, EPG 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Data Conditioning and Validation - Jim Thorp, Virginia Tech 2013 TR Review - PMU-based Voltage Stability - Scott Ghiocel, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2013 TR Review - Oscillation Monitoring System - Mani Venkatasubramanian,

209

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Presentations 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Ben Hobbs (Johns Hopkins), Kameshwar Poolla (UC Berkeley) Session II: Ray Zimmerman (Cornell), Hsiao-Dong Chiang (Cornell) Session III: Shmuel Oren (UC Berkeley), Dan Tylavsky (U Arizona), Tom Overbye (U Illinois) Session IV: Lindsay Anderson (Cornell), HyungSeon Oh (Cornell) 2013 R&M Peer Review - Assessing Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs, Johns Hopkins 2013 R&M Peer Review - Coordinated Aggregation of Distributed Energy Resources - Kameshwar Poolla, UC Berkeley

210

NETL: SECA Workshop Proceedings, Peer Reviews, and Annual Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Solid State Energy Conversion Alliance (SECA) SECA Workshop Proceedings and Peer Reviews The proceedings from the all workshops that the SECA program has sponsored are described on this page. In addition, the Peer Review Results are also summarized. Annual Workshop Proceedings Core Technology Workshop Proceedings Peer Review Results 2008 SECA 9th Annual Workshop & Peer Review CD Cover Annual Workshop Proceedings 13th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2012) 12th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2011) 11th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2010) 10th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2009) 9th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (Aug 2008) 8th Annual SECA Workshop - San Antonio, TX (Aug 2007) 7th Annual SECA Workshop - Philadelphia, PA (Sept 2006)

211

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations are available through the individual session links. The agenda and introduction by Joe Eto, LBNL, are available below. Day 1: June 27 Session I Baselining Studies and Analysis, Bharat Bhargava, EPG Baselining Studies and Analysis, Brett Amidan, PNNL Synchrophasor Standards Support and Development, Ken Martin, EPG Session II Advanced Synchrophasor Metrology, Stan Hadley, ORNL GPS Issue Management, Mark Buckner, ORNL Technology Assessment for Next Generation PMU, Mark Buckner, ORNL Session III Measurement-Based Stability Assessment, Dan Trudnowski, U. Montana

212

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability & Markets Peer Review Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentations and summaries are available through the links and the agenda is included below. Summaries | Full Presentations Day 1: August 7 Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty About Fuel Prices, Technology, Renewables Penetration and Market Responses Using a Multi-State Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch and Distributed Resource Aggregations Development and Testing of New Tools Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework: Phase 2 Essence of Structure Preserving (ESP) Network Reductions for

213

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentati...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems Distributed Control - Mariesa Crow, U Missouri-Rolla.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - SiC Power Converter System Thermal Mgmt and High Temp Packaging - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf...

214

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below....

215

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Flow Battery Modeling Energy Storage Systems Peer Review September 26-28, 2012 MJ Martinez (PI), J...

216

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TIAX LLC TIAX LLC 35 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421-3102 www.TIAXLLC.com Flow Battery Membrane Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012...

217

2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review 2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review 2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review The 2013 Department of Energy (DOE) Building Technologies Office Program Review was held April 2-4, 2013 in Washington, DC. This inaugural review encompassed active work done by the Building Technologies Office (BTO), with a total of 59 individual activities reviewed. Sixty independent experts assessed the progress and contributions of each project toward BTO's mission and goals, and these assessments will be used to enhance the management of existing efforts, gauge the effectiveness of projects, and design future programs. The meeting also provided an opportunity to promote collaborations, partnerships, and technology transfers. 2013 Program Peer Review Report | 2013 Program Peer Review Presentations

218

2012 Load as a Resource Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Load as a Resource Program Peer Review Load as a Resource Program Peer Review 2012 Load as a Resource Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Load as a Resource (LAAR) Program peer review included 8 presentations on September 20, 2012 at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Agenda and presentations are below. 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Agenda 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Frequency Response Demand - Jeff Dagle, PNNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Frequency Responsive Load Evaluation and Benefits - Isabelle Snyder, ORNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Load as a Regulation Resource, Phase 2 - Sila Kiliccote, LBNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation - Nasr Alkadi, ORNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Integration and Extension of Direct Load Management of Smart Loads - Anna Scaglioni, UC Davis

219

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2008 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen Program George Thomas, Sandia National Laboratory, retired This award recognizes George Thomas' past and continued technical excellence and outstanding dedication to the DOE Hydrogen Program in support of the President's Advanced Energy Initiative and the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative. Thomas' contributions to the Hydrogen Storage activity have

220

Peer Review Improves Undergraduate Science Writing Skills  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

a. ) Does the discussion follow a logical order? (b. ) Doa. ) Does the discussion follow a logical order? (b. ) Do

Conte, Debra

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

March, 2010 NIFS Administrative Council External Peer Review Committee  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

21 2010 3 March, 2010 NIFS Administrative Council External Peer Review Committee NIFS Peer DEMO LHD V NIFS-HEAT W Y Li MHD Er2O3 Li Li-Pb FlibeF-BeF2 #12;10 V 4 FlibeF-BeF2 been invoked to enhance the electron current in V3Ga. In the NIFS engineering research, the main goals

Ito, Atsushi

222

SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE: 2006 TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW  

SciTech Connect

Prompted by a $10 million Congressional allocation to identify supplemental actions to protect the Columbia River from groundwater contamination beneath the Hanford Reservation, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Clean-up Technology identified twenty-three potential technical projects and then down-selected ten of these for further evaluation. An independent expert peer review was conducted for the ten down-selected proposals. The review panel consisted of twenty-three recognized subject matter experts that broadly represented academia, industry, and federal laboratories. Of the initial ten proposals reviewed, one was given unconditional support, six were given conditional support, and three were not supported as proposed. Three additional proposals were then submitted by DOE for review--these proposals were structured, in part, to respond to the initial round of technical peer review comments. Peer reviews of these additional proposals provided conditional support. For those proposals that received conditional support, DOE requested specific implementation and work plans and assessed whether the plans adequately addressed the technical conditions identified by the review panel. The final list of technology proposals receiving support, or conditional support, primarily focused on understanding and reducing the potential impacts of uranium, chromium, and strontium from facilities adjacent to the Columbia River, with a secondary focus on understanding and limiting the future Columbia River impacts from the large carbon tetrachloride groundwater plume underlying and downgradient of the Hanford Central Plateau facilities. The results and recommendations of the peer reviews informed the final DOE project selections and supported implementation of the selected projects to protect the Columbia River and address groundwater contamination at Hanford.

Looney, B; Dawn Kaback; Gene Leboeuf; Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz; Lynn Lefkoff

2006-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

223

2010 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2010 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability research area focuses on two key areas: 1) Real-Time Grid Reliability Management and 2) Reliability and Markets. The first area develops monitoring and analysis tools that process synchrophasor data to enable real-time assessment of grid status and stability margins, with the goal of improving power system reliability and visibility through wide-area measurement and control. It is developing advanced technologies and tools to help create a resilient electric transmission system that can better detect disturbances, accommodate a variety of generation sources, and automatically reconfigure the grid to prevent widespread outages and/or rebalance the system. The second area

224

Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's High Temperature Superconductivity (HTS) for Electric Systems Program's specific mission is to work in partnership with industry to develop HTS wire and perform other research and development activities leading to the commercialization of HTS-based electric power applications by U.S. companies. This technology contributes to several key performance improvements of the grid. It enhances reliability by increasing capacity, which relieves congestion and helps prevent outages. Efficiency is improved as a result of the reduction of loss during operation which both conserves

225

Advanced Combustion Engine Program 2005 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle ADVANCED COMBUSTION ENGINE PROGRAM F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 5, 2005 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on April 19-21, 2005 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were provided (with reviewers' names deleted) to the presenters in early June and were used by national laboratory researchers in the development of Annual Operating Plans (AOPs) for fiscal year (FY) 2006. The panel's

226

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report: May 14-18, 2012, Arlington, VA  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the fiscal year (FY) 2012 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 14-18, 2012, in Arlington, VA.

Not Available

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Bharat Bhargava (EPG), Brett Amidan (PNNL), Ken Martin (EPG) Session II: Mark Buckner (ORNL) Session III: Dan Trudnowski (U Montana), Ning Zhou (PNNL) Session IV: Frank Tuffner (PNNL), Bernie Lesieutre (U Wisconsin), Harold Kirkham (PNNL), YC Zhang (NREL) 2013 TR Review - Eastern Interconnection Phase Angle Base Lining Study - Bharat Bhargava, EPG 2013 TR Review - Baselining Studies and Analysis - Brett Amidan, PNNL 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Standards Development and Support - Ken Martin, EPG

228

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Bharat Bhargava (EPG), Brett Amidan (PNNL), Ken Martin (EPG) Session II: Mark Buckner (ORNL) Session III: Dan Trudnowski (U Montana), Ning Zhou (PNNL) Session IV: Frank Tuffner (PNNL), Bernie Lesieutre (U Wisconsin), Harold Kirkham (PNNL), YC Zhang (NREL) 2013 TR Review - Eastern Interconnection Phase Angle Base Lining Study - Bharat Bhargava, EPG 2013 TR Review - Baselining Studies and Analysis - Brett Amidan, PNNL 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Standards Development and Support - Ken Martin, EPG

229

Peer Review 2008 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Subject: Report on the Quality Assessment Review of the Investigative Operations of the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Energy Reviewer: U.S. Small...

230

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2010 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2010 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen Program Team Awards (with special recognition for outstanding technical contributions): Production and Delivery Jamie Holladay, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) This award recognizes Jamie Holladay for his outstanding contributions to hydrogen production and delivery. He completed a two-year assignment in July, 2009, with the Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies (FCT)

231

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2011 Annual Merit Review Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2011 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2011 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Team Awards (with special recognition for outstanding technical contributions): Production Tom Jaramillo, Stanford University This award recognizes Tom Jaramillo for the invaluable contributions he has made to the program in the field of photoelectrochemical (PEC) hydrogen production. Dr. Jaramillo has been an instrumental driving force in EERE's

232

Position paper - peer review and design verification of selected activities  

SciTech Connect

Position Paper to develop and document a position on the performance of independent peer reviews on selected design and analysis components of the Title I (preliminary) and Title II (detailed) design phases of the Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility project.

Stine, M.D.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Three of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Smart Charger Technology Development, Frank Tuffner, PNNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Vehicle to Grid Demonstration - Willett Kempton, U. Delaware.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Estimating and Mitigating Cascading Failure Risk - Paul Hines, U. Vermont.pdf

234

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion CrackingFatigue Modeling for Light Water Reactor Cooling System Components Working...

235

Peer Review 2009 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2009 Reviewer: Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General The attached report presents the results of our external...

236

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review and Update Meeting | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Update Meeting and Update Meeting Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review and Update Meeting The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions; the agenda is available below. Presentations are available through the individual session links. Presentations Day 1 Session 1: Chaired by Imre Gyuk, DOE Session 2: Chaired by Ron Staubly, NETL Session 3: Chaired by Bill Capp, Grid Storage Consulting Poster Session: National Lab Projects | ARPA-E Projects Day 2 Session 1: Chaired by Tony Martino, SNL Session 2: Chaired by Ross Guttromson, SNL Session 3: Chaired by Stan Atcitty, SNL Poster Session: SBIR Projects | University Projects | ARRA Projects

237

DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 Agency Sub- agency RIN OMB Control Number Title of Initiative RulelCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date...

238

2012 CERTS Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

R&M Review August 7-8, 2012 Cornell University Statler Hotel 130 Statler Drive | Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 257-2500 Day 1: August 7, 2011 The meeting will be held in the Statler Hotel...

239

FINAL REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REPORT REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL FEBRUARY 28, 2002 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. Signature Page Preface Executive Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Organization of the Peer Review 1.2 Objectives of the Review 1.3 Content of the Final Report 2. MAIN FINDINGS 2.1 Perspective 2.2 Overall Findings 2.3 Corrosion Degradation Modes 2.4 Higher or Lower Temperature Operating Modes 2.5 Long-Term Uniform Corrosion of Passive Metal 2.6 Alloy Specification and Comparison 2.7 Technical Issues to be Resolved 2.8 Organizational-Managerial Issues 3. SUMMARY OF DEGRADATION MODES AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Repository Conditions: Overview of Time, Temperature, Environment

240

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on AddThis.com... Publications Program Publications Roadmaps Program Plans Reports to Congress Annual Progress Reports

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Commercial Lighting Solutions Webtool Peer Review Report, Office Solutions  

SciTech Connect

The Commercial Lighting Solutions (CLS) project directly supports the U.S. Department of Energys Commercial Building Energy Alliance efforts to design high performance buildings. CLS creates energy efficient best practice lighting designs for widespread use, and they are made available to users via an interactive webtool that both educates and guides the end user through the application of the Lighting Solutions. This report summarizes the peer review of the CLS webtool for offices. The methodology for the peer review process included data collection (stakeholder input), analysis of the comments, and organization of the input into categories for prioritization of the comments against a set of criteria. Based on this process, recommendations were developed for the release of version 2.0 of the webtool at the Lightfair conference in Las Vegas in May 2010. The report provides a list of the top ten most significant and relevant improvements that will be made within the webtool for version 2.0 as well as appendices containing the comments and short-term priorities in additional detail. Peer review comments that are considered high priority by the reviewers and the CLS team but cannot be completed for Version 2.0 are listed as long-term recommendations.

Beeson, Tracy A.; Jones, Carol C.

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

2013 Buiulding Technologies Office Program Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Photo Credits Photo Credits (top to bottom) 1. Multifamily apartment building; photo courtesy of istock.com. 2. Zero-energy single family home; photo courtesy of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, images.nrel.gov, image 6310910. 3. Office building; photo courtesy of istock.com. 4. View of researcher using Linked-View Parallel Coordinate Plot Renderer software to analyze DOE's Roof Savings Calculator data on Oak Ridge National Laboratory's (ORNL's) Exploratory Visual Environment for Research in Science and Technology (EVEREST): photo courtesy of ORNL. 5. Sandia Cooler; photo courtesy of Sandia National Laboratories. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

243

2013 Buiulding Technologies Office Program Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Photo Credits Photo Credits (top to bottom) 1. Multifamily apartment building; photo courtesy of istock.com. 2. Zero-energy single family home; photo courtesy of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, images.nrel.gov, image 6310910. 3. Office building; photo courtesy of istock.com. 4. View of researcher using Linked-View Parallel Coordinate Plot Renderer software to analyze DOE's Roof Savings Calculator data on Oak Ridge National Laboratory's (ORNL's) Exploratory Visual Environment for Research in Science and Technology (EVEREST): photo courtesy of ORNL. 5. Sandia Cooler; photo courtesy of Sandia National Laboratories. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

244

Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Denver Marriott West Golden, Colorado AGENDA Tuesday, November 2, 2010 8:00 am Registration and Continental Breakfast 9:00 am-9:10 am Welcome Dr. Robert Hawsey, Associate Laboratory Director for Renewable Electricity and End Use Systems, US DOE-National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9:10 am-9:25 am Overview of Smart Grid Program Eric Lightner, U.S. Department of Energy 9:25 am-9:40 am Overview of Smart Grid Research and Development Activities Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy Moderator - Merrill Smith, U.S. Department of Energy 9:40 am-10:10 am University of Hawaii Renewable and Distributed Systems Jay Griffin, University of Hawaii 10:10 am-10:40 am Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System Dennis Sumner, City of Fort Collins

245

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Intelligent Power Infrastructure Consortium - Deepak Divan, Georgia Institute of Technology.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - HI Sustainable Energy Project, Part 1 - Jennifer Stinebaugh, SNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - HI Sustainable Energy Project, Part 2 - Ben Kroposki, NREL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Marin County Renewables, David Cohen, Infotility.pdf

246

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Borrego Springs Microgrid - Tom Bialek, SDG&E.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Demonstration - Craig Gee, Chevron.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Texas Microgrids for Colonias and Renewable Microgrid STEM Education - Dean Schneider, TCAT.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL.pdf

247

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Three Morning Presentations Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Three of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Smart Charger Technology Development, Frank Tuffner, PNNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Vehicle to Grid Demonstration - Willett Kempton, U. Delaware.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Estimating and Mitigating Cascading Failure Risk - Paul Hines, U. Vermont.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - GridWise Architecture - Ronald Melton, PNNL.pdf

248

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: NSTAR Automated Mater Reading Based Dynamic Pricing - Douglas Horton, NSTAR Electric & Gas  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting AMR Based Dynamic Pricing y g Doug Horton NSTAR Electric & Gas Co. 6/8/2012 AMR Based Dynamic Pricing Objective Provide two-way communication of electricity cost & consumption data utilizing the customers existing meter & Internet. Goal to achieve 5% reduction in peak and Goal to achieve 5% reduction in peak and average load. Life-cycle Funding ($K) Total Budget Total DOE Funding to Technical Scope Use customer's existing AMR meter and broadband Internet to achieve two way Total Budget Total DOE Funding Funding to Date $4,900k $2,362k $1,623k broadband Internet to achieve two way communication and "AMI" functionality Cutting-edge solution to integrate: * Existing meters E i ti I t t December 2008 * Existing Internet * Existing billing & CIS

249

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The afternoon presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Interoperability of Demand Response Resources in NY - John Giacona, Con Edison.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Integrated Distribution Management System in AL - Joe Schatz, SCS.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Yahia Baghzouz, UNLV.pdf

250

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission August 15, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM revamped and expanded peer reviews for its contracts and projects in the past year with a goal of improving performance and delivering results in the world's largest nuclear cleanup

251

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission August 15, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM revamped and expanded peer reviews for its contracts and projects in the past year with a goal of improving performance and delivering results in the world's largest nuclear cleanup

252

SRS Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review, July 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SRS-2011-07-15 SRS-2011-07-15 Site: Savannah River Site, NA-26 Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review Dates of Activity : 07/12/2011 - 07/15/2011 Report Preparer: James Lockridge Activity Description/Purpose: At the request of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Enterprise Project Management (NA- APM-20), the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), provided an expert to review the Waste Solidification Building (WSB) startup programs and procedures associated with worker safety and health, environment, and security. Criteria for the review was detailed in the Criteria,

253

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Second Generation Emissions Study - Rick Fioravanti, DNV KEMA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

number 2012 DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review Second Generation Emissions Study Washington, DC September 26 - 28, 2012 Original KEMA Study on Emission Benefits  Study was conducted in 2007 and compared a flywheel to traditional technologies - Study highlights - Showed emission savings from utilization of storage - Study provided a simple "snapshot" of potential trends - Compared a flywheel to natural gas, coal, and pumped hydro systems - Methodology "vetted" at 2007 EESAT Conference - Next steps called for a "deeper dive into actual performance numbers - Actual simulations of specific ISO  Today, study is still cited as the main "Emission " Study for such applications - Results referenced in many cases as a secondary benefit of storage systems

254

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Amber Kinetics Flywheel Energy Storage Demo - Ed Chiao, Amber Kinetics  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

amber_kinetics amber_kinetics DOE Peer Review September 2012 Ed Chiao, CEO amber_kinetics Amber Kinetics: Our Flywheel History Start-up launched in 2009, Stanford University Cleantech Entrepreneurship class Established a technology licensing & flywheel development partnership with LLNL; Amber Kinetics identified new material & lower-cost rotor designs for commercialization Awarded a Smart Grid Energy Storage Demonstration grant award for flywheels Awarded a matching grant for development & demonstration of flywheel technology Stanford University Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy California Energy Commission World-class institutions | innovative, deep flywheel technology owned by Amber Amber Kinetics, Inc. - Confidential and Proprietary, All Rights Reserved

255

Peer Review of NRC Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) Models underwent a Peer Review using ASME PRA standard (Addendum C) as endorsed by NRC in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200. The review was performed by a mix of industry probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) experts and NRC PRA experts. Representative SPAR models, one PWR and one BWR, were reviewed against Capability Category I of the ASME PRA standard. Capability Category I was selected as the basis for review due to the specific uses/applications of the SPAR models. The BWR SPAR model was reviewed against 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements; however, based on the Capability Category I level of review and the absence of internal flooding and containment performance (LERF) logic only 216 requirements were determined to be applicable. Based on the review, the BWR SPAR model met 139 of the 216 supporting requirements. The review also generated 200 findings or suggestions. Of these 200 findings and suggestions 142 were findings and 58 were suggestions. The PWR SPAR model was also evaluated against the same 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements. Of these requirements only 215 were deemed appropriate for the review (for the same reason as noted for the BWR). The PWR review determined that 125 of the 215 supporting requirements met Capability Category I or greater. The review identified 101 findings or suggestions (76 findings and 25 suggestions). These findings or suggestions were developed to identify areas where SPAR models could be enhanced. A process to prioritize and incorporate the findings/suggestions supporting requirements into the SPAR models is being developed. The prioritization process focuses on those findings that will enhance the accuracy, completeness and usability of the SPAR models.

Anthony Koonce; James Knudsen; Robert Buell

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

Merit Review of BER Activities at the DOE Laboratories | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Merit Review of BER Activities at the DOE Laboratories Merit Review of BER Activities at the DOE Laboratories Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BER Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BER Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policy Grants & Contracts Guidance Laboratory Scientific Focus Area Guidance SBIR/STTR Funding Opportunities Merit Review of BER Activities at the DOE Laboratories Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) News & Resources Contact Information Biological and Environmental Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-23/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3251 F: (301) 903-5051 E: sc.ber@science.doe.gov More Information »

257

Advanced Combustion, Emission Control, Health Impacts, and Fuels Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06 06 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t L e s s d e p e n d e n c e o n f o r e i g n o i l t o d a y, a n d t r a n s i t i o n t o a p e t r o l e u m - f r e e , e m i s s i o n s - f r e e v e h i c l e t o m o r r o w . F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m AdvAnced combustion, emission controls, HeAltH impActs, And Fuels merit review And peer evAluAtion Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 2006 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2006 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion, Emission Controls, Health Impacts, and Fuels Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 15-18, 2006 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were provided (with reviewers' names deleted) to the presenters in early June and were used by national laboratory

258

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ANALYSIS ANALYSIS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 465 2013 - Systems Analysis Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Systems Analysis Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Systems Analysis Program: The reviewers considered the Systems Analysis program to be an essential component of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program's (the Program's) mission. The projects were considered to be appropriately diverse and focused on addressing technical barriers and meeting targets. In general, the reviewers noted that the Systems Analysis program is well managed and demonstrated the ability to address immediate analytical needs and overall objectives and plans, especially to implement the new initiative, H

259

Energy Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy¬タルs 2010 Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review July 29, 2010 The Department of Energy conducted a Peer Review of its Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) Research and Development Program on July 20-22, during which 28 R&D projects were presented for review by industry stakeholders. More than 65 energy sector stakeholders came to network, present, and learn about DOE projects, while more than 20 joined in by webinar. The CEDS program's national lab, academic, and industry partners-including the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) partners and Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) project- presented DOE-supported efforts involving secured SCADA communications and smart grid applications,

260

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Flow Battery Membrane Flow Battery Membrane Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012 Jack Treger treger.jack@tiaxllc.com Washington DC, September 27, 2012 Flow Battery Membrane Background and Purpose 1 Vanadium redox batteries (VRB) for energy storage require improved ion- selective membranes. * Vanadium permeation across current membranes leads to self-discharge and decreases cycling efficiency: - Negative half cell: V 2+ V 3+ + e - E o = -0.255V - Positive half cell: e - + VO 2 + + 2H + VO 2+ + H 2 O E o = 1.00V . * Current perfluorosulfonic acid polymer membranes are costly. * TIAX is developing a novel composite bipolar membrane: - Composite anionic membrane minimizes content of costly perfluorosulfonic acid polymer - Made bipolar by a cationic surface layer to improve selectivity for

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Flow Battery Modeling Energy Storage Systems Peer Review September 26-28, 2012 MJ Martinez (PI), J Clausen, SM Davison, HK Moffat Flow Battery Modeling Schematic of a Flow Battery PURPOSE: The flow battery modeling task seeks to improve fundamental understanding and enable high-performing, low-cost designs of flow batteries through

262

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Smart Grid Panel  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Panel Smart Grid Panel Discussion 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Smart Grid Panel Discussion The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the Day 2 Smart Grid panel discussion are below. Moderator: Lee Kreval, SDG&E 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Puesh Kumar, American Public Power Association 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Rogelio Sullivan, NC State University 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Matt Wakefield, EPRI More Documents & Publications Smart Grid Characteristics, Values, and Metrics

263

Thermophysical properties of uranium dioxide - Version 0 for peer review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Data on thermophysical properties of solid and liquid UO{sub 2} have been reviewed and critically assessed to obtain consistent thermophysical property recommendations for inclusion in the International Nuclear Safety Center Database on the World Wide Web (http://www.insc.anl.gov.). Thermodynamic properties that have been assessed are enthalpy, heat capacity, melting point, enthalpy of fusion, thermal expansion, density, surface tension, and vapor pressure. Transport properties that have been assessed are thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, viscosity, and emissivity. Summaries of the recommendations with uncertainties and detailed assessments for each property are included in this report and in the International Nuclear Safety Center Database for peer review. The assessments includes a review of the experiments and data, an examination of previous recommendations, the basis for selecting recommendations, a determination of uncertainties, and a comparison of recommendations with data and with previous recommendations. New data and research that have led to new recommendations include thermal expansion and density measurements of solid and liquid UO{sub 2}, derivation of physically-based equations for the thermal conductivity of solid UO{sub 2}, measurements of the heat capacity of liquid UO{sub 2}, and measurements and analysis of the thermal conductivity of liquid UO{sub 2}.

Fink, J.K.; Petri, M.C.

1997-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

264

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Nitrogen-Oxygen Battery for Large Scale Energy Storage - Frank Delnick, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program Peer Review, Washington, DC Sept. 26-28, 2012 Frank Delnick, David Ingersoll, Karen Waldrip, Peter Feibelman Nitrogen/Oxygen Battery A Transformational Architecture for Large Scale Energy Storage Power Sources Technology Group Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM SAND2012-7881P N 2 /O 2 Battery Project Overview  Air/Air battery.  N 2 electrochemistry enables the redefinition of a gas (diffusion) electrode and the three phase interface.  Operated as redox flow battery.  Provide a very high energy density, very low cost, environmentally benign electrochemical platform for load leveling and for grid-integrated storage of energy generated by wind, solar and other sustainable but intermittent sources.

265

Using Protons to Peer into Metal Solidification | U.S. DOE Office of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Using Protons to Peer into Metal Solidification Using Protons to Peer into Metal Solidification Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) News & Resources Contact Information Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-22/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3081 F: (301) 903-6594 E: sc.bes@science.doe.gov More Information » June 2013 Using Protons to Peer into Metal Solidification Proton radiography is a new tool for imaging melting and solidification of metals. Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Click to enlarge photo. Enlarge Photo Image courtesy of LANL Protons and x-rays permit direct, nondestructive imaging of melting and

266

Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly. Part II  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In our previous work (Scientometrics 87:293---301, 2011), a numerical model of over-competitive research funding in "peer-group-assessed-grant-based-funding-system" was proposed and the process was firstly investigated quantitatively. The simulation ... Keywords: 60H99, C15, C32, Cosmology, Excessive competition, Mainstream, Peer review, Publications, Research funding

Xuan Zhen Liu; Hui Fang

2012-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

ORISE: Coordinating Scientific Peer Reviews to Advance Energy Efficiency  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Efficiency Energy Efficiency ORISE Reviews and Evaluates Technologies that Advance Energy Efficiency ORISE Reviews and Evaluates Technologies that Advance Energy Efficiency In addition to renewable energy and changes in individual behavior, energy efficiency is generally achieved through the development of more efficient technologies. Buildings are being constructed with more energy efficient systems, fluorescent light bulbs are replacing incandescent lights, and new vehicle technologies are enabling America to use less petroleum. The Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE) realizes that energy efficiency encompasses a wide spectrum of industries and supports the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in its mission to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil.

268

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2012 Annual Merit Review Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2012 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program presents "Program Awards" for contributions to the overall efforts of the Program, and "Sub-Program Awards" to recognize achievements in specific areas. This year, the Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Office and the Vehicle Technologies Office also presented a joint "Special Recognition Award." Special Recognition Award from the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and the Vehicle Technologies Office Judi Abraham, Conference Management Associates, Inc. As a special tribute, the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office recognize Ms. Judi Abraham for her exceptional

269

Construction Review | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policies EFRCs FOA Applications from Universities and Other Research...

270

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2012 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to Congress Policies and Acts Financial Opportunities Related Links U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Library > Annual...

271

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2004 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to Congress Policies and Acts Financial Opportunities Related Links U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Library > Annual...

272

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: Annual Merit Review and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to Congress Policies and Acts Financial Opportunities Related Links U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Library > Annual...

273

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LIPA Smart Energy Corridor Project - Ming Mui, LIPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting DE-OE0000220 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Ming Mui and Sunil Katwala June 8, 2012 December 2008 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) Fiscal Years 2010 to 2015 DOE Funding $ 12,496K Total Project Cost $ 25,293K* Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) * Additional funding from LIPA and SUNY Research Foundation Smart Energy Corridor will: (1) Validate Smart Grid technologies; (2) Quantify Smart Grid costs and benefits; (3) Validate Smart Grid applications at a scale that can be readily adapted and replicated in individual homes and businesses. * Demonstrate Technolgy (DA, Sub Auto, AMI, DLC) * Marketing (TOU Rates, Webtools, Visualization) * Cyber Security (Vulneribility Testing & Hardening)

274

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Photos placed in Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project September 28, 2012 Jim Ellison, Verne Loose, Ray Byrne, Cesar Silva Monroy, and Ryan Elliott Sandia National Laboratories Leigh Tesfatsion Iowa State University DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review 2012 Introduction - Motivation for a New Market Design  Need to eliminate market bias of resource classes such as Energy Storage  Need to accommodate new technologies, without the need to change market rules  Move away from resource-centric markets toward service-centric markets

275

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium-based Battery Development - Dave Ingersoll, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium-based Battery Development Sodium-based Battery Development A Family of Batteries for Large Scale Energy Storage D. Ingersoll, C. Apblett, E. Spoerke, K. Zavadil, R. Cygan, J. Ihlefeld, F. Delnick, & T. Anderson Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM Prof. E. Wachsman University of Maryland, College Park, MD Profs. R. Kee & J. Porter, Dr. H. Zhu Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO S. Bhavaraju & M. Robins Ceramatec, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT D. Beeaff CoorsTek, Inc, Golden, CO J. Martin Boulder Ionics, Golden CO US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program Peer Review, Washington, DC, Sept. 26-28, 2012 Sodium-based batteries  Purpose  Demonstrate a family of sodium-based battery chemistries  sodium-iodine, sodium-bromine, sodium-air, sodium insertion, sodium-metal, etc

276

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wind Firming EnergyFarm - Tom Stepien, Primus Power  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wind Firming EnergyFarm DOE Peer Review September 26, 2012 2 Primus Power is on track to deliver EnergyPods TM to California's Modesto Irrigation District starting 2014 EnergyPod TM 250 kW  1 MWh PowerBox Supports 8 EnergyPods TM 3 How will storage integrate into Modesto's system? Modesto's daily load ? Storage Hydro Coal & Gas Wind Solar 4 Modesto's 25 MW McHenry solar farm 5 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and solar energy 25 MW McHenry Solar Farm 6 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and solar energy 25 MW McHenry Solar Farm 8.7 MW up in 15 min 15 MW down in 15 min 4-Aug-12 7 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and

277

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluating Utility Owned Evaluating Utility Owned Electric Energy Storage Systems: A Perspective for State Electric Utility Regulators DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review 2012 September 28, 2012 Dhruv Bhatnagar & Verne Loose Sandia National Laboratories Motivation for this Work  Many state utility regulatory bodies are unfamiliar with electric energy storage systems  The technology  The functional uses  The value of these uses to the grid  This leads to a handicap in their proper evaluation for rate base  May prevent the best (economic) technologies from system integration 2 Source: GE What we are doing  Developing a guidebook:  Inform regulators about the system benefits of energy storage  Identify regulatory challenges to increased

278

2012 SG Peer Review - SDE&G Borrego Springs Microgrid - Tom Bialek, SDG&E  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting SDG&E Borrego Springs Microgrid Demonstration Project Thomas Bialek, PhD, PE Principal Investigator June 8, 2012 December 2008 Borrego Springs Microgrid Demonstration Project Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) Budget Period 1 FY2008 - FY2010 Budget Period 2 FY2011 - FY2013 Total DOE Funding $1,241 $6,237 $7,477 Technical Scope Conduct a pilot scale "proof-of concept" demonstration of how advanced information- based technologies and distributed energy resources (DER) may increase asset utilization and reliability of the power grid in support of the national agenda. Establish a microgrid demonstration to prove the effectiveness of integrating multiple DER technologies, energy storage, feeder automation system technologies, and outage management

279

2012 CERTS Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

R&M Review R&M Review August 7-8, 2012 Cornell University Statler Hotel 130 Statler Drive | Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 257-2500 Day 1: August 7, 2011 The meeting will be held in the Statler Hotel (Yale/Princeton conference rooms) 8:30 Continental Breakfast (Conference Foyer 2) 9:00 Introductions and overview - Bob Thomas 9:15 DOE Vision/Priorities/Future Directions - Phil Overholt 9:30 #1: Transmission Investment Assessment under Uncertainty About Fuel Prices, Technology, Renewables Penetration and Market Responses Using a Multi-Stage Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse Ben Hobbs, Dick Schuler, Francisco Munoz 10:15 #2: Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch And Distributed Resource Aggregation Pravin Varaiya, Felix Wu, K. Poolla, Anand Subramanian

280

2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations 3 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available September 9, 2013 - 3:25pm Addthis The agendas and presentations from the June and August 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Program reviews are now available for download. The June 27-28 Transmission Reliability Program review combined the North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) and Advanced Application Development subprograms. The 2-day review included an overview of the program and six sessions of presentations from researchers funded by OE. The NASPI working group addresses the installation of synchrophasor networks across the United States with Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grant funds. Advanced Application Development projects include

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Graphic of the White House with text that refers to the DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, Washington, DC, June 9 - 13, 2008. Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the DOE Hydrogen Program's Annual Merit Review on June 9-13 in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations Production & Delivery Distributed BILI Production Electrolysis High-Temperature Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative Biomass Gasification Biological Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen From Coal

282

Responsible Authorship and Peer Review James R. Wilson  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of cold fusion is a striking illustration of what happens when scientists circumvent the normal peer and resources to show that there is no convincing evidence for room-temperature fusion. Much of this effort would not have been necessary had normal scientific procedures been followed. --John R. Huizenga, Cold

283

Full Economic Costing:-Updated guidance notes for peer reviewers  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the level of resources required to undertake the project and not their unit cost. In particular, peer are as follows: 1) Directly Incurred costs: These are costs which are specific to a project and will be charged to the project on the basis of actual costs incurred. They must be supported by an audit record, which

284

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

AND DELIVERY AND DELIVERY FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 7 2013 - Hydrogen Production and Delivery Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program: This review session evaluated hydrogen production and delivery research and development (R&D) activities in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Office (FCTO) in the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The hydrogen production projects reviewed represented a diverse portfolio of technologies to produce hydrogen from renewable energy sources. Production project sub-categories included water electrolysis, solar-driven thermochemical cycles, photoelectrochemical (PEC) direct water splitting, and biological hydrogen

285

Microsoft Word - ASME FY08 Fuel Cell Peer Review Report_FINAL.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Meeting Host Organization Technology & Management Services, Inc. Steven T. Ostheim (412) 386-6485 Review Panel AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Minking K. Chyu, Chair, Peer Review Panel Richard Laudenat, Chair, Peer Review Executive Committee Michael Tinkleman, Director, Research ASME Center for Research and Technology Development (202) 785-7394 Meeting Facilitator and Final Report Ross Brindle, Energetics Incorporated (410) 953-6239 Work Done Under Prime Contract Number DE-AC26-05NT41816 (Subtask 305.01.02.3) FINAL REPORT 2008 STRATEGIC CENTER FOR COAL FUEL CELL PROGRAM PEER REVIEW MEETING Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania April 21-25, 2008 MEETING SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT José D. Figueroa NETL Project Manager and Meeting Coordinator

286

DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 | Department of...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Report May 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 May2012 ReportDOE525.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report...

287

USCMS DOE/NSF Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

January 17-19 , 2007 University of Texas, Arlington Charge to the committee pdf The Report on the Joint DOENSF Review to the U.S. Department of Energy pdf (Link to main review...

288

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS 402 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Safety, Codes and Standards Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Safety, Codes and Standards Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Safety, Codes and Standards Program: The Safety, Codes and Standards program supports research and development (R&D) that provides the critical information needed to define requirements and close gaps in safety, codes, and standards to enable the safe use and handling of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. The program also conducts safety activities focused on promoting safety practices among U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) projects and the development of information resources and best practices. Reviewers recognized that the program continues to provide strong support in the following

289

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy-Efficient Product Procurement (EEPP) Portfolio Meeting: Washington D.C., Dec. 4, 2012 Reviewers: David Goldstein (Chair), Harvey Sachs, Cyndi Vallina, Marina Moses, and Shahzeen Attari Review: Jan. 25, 2013 Summary The Review Committee met in Washington, D.C., and engaged in a day-long discussion with FEMP EEPP staff and contractors. Program staff gave clear and effective presentations, and we had extensive and illuminating discussions with the staff, and to a limited extent with other interested parties who attended. The Committee worked together after the meeting and by email to produce this review. Our review addresses: * strategic issues with respect to the program,

290

2012 SG Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed g Joe Eto Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 7 June 2012 The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed Objective To lower the cost and improve the performance of clusters of smaller distributed energy resources and loads when operated in an integrated manner when operated in an integrated manner, i.e., as microgrids Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) Prior to FY12, FY13, Out-year(s) Technical Scope The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed is being expanded through the addition of new hardware elements: 1) a CERTS- compatible conventional synchronous generator ; 2) an FY 12 , authorized , requested y ( ) 2500K 1000K 1000K 2500K energy management system relying on software as a service (SaaS) for dispatch; 3) a commercially available, stand-alone

291

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ardalan Kemiab, Southern California Edison  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) ( ) Ed Kamiab Southern California Edison (SCE) 6/8/2012 ISGD Objective SCE' I i S t G id D t ti (ISGD) ill (Insert graphic here) SCE's Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) will demonstrate an integrated, scalable Smart Grid system that includes many of the interlocking pieces of an end- to-end Smart Grid system, from the transmission and distrib tion s stems to cons mer applications s ch as distribution systems to consumer applications such as smart appliances and plug-in electric vehicles. Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY2010 FY2015 1. Energy Smart Customer Devices 2 Year 2020 Distribution System Technical Scope FY2010 - FY2015 $39,612 2. Year 2020 Distribution System 3. Interoperability & Cyber Security 4. Workforce of the Future

292

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION 442 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Market Transformation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Market Transformation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Market Transformation Program: The purpose of the Market Transformation program is to spur market growth for domestically produced hydrogen and fuel cell systems. By supporting increased sales in key early markets, this program helps to identify and overcome non-technical barriers to commercial deployment and to reduce the life cycle costs of fuel cell power by helping to achieve economies of scale. The current focus of the Market Transformation program is to build on past successes in lift truck and emergency backup power applications (part of the U.S. Department of Energy's [DOE's]

293

ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

leading U.S. public clean energy programs. ESTAP* Overview Purpose: Create new DOE-state energy storage partnerships and advance energy storage, with technical assistance from...

294

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage in the Southeast - Jim...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initial Results a Objectives * Determine whether energy storage can reduce the costs of delivering electricity in a coal-heavy, vertically integrated system that does not expect...

295

Fuels Technologies Program 2005 Merit Review & Peer Evaluation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for industry program participants (engine manufacturers, emission control manufacturers, vehicle manufacturers, etc.) to shape the DOE-sponsored R&D program so that the highest...

296

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Computational Tool (ESCT...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

analyticalapproach * DOE will hold webinars to demonstrate the tool to Smart Grid Demonstration Program recipients before the end of the year. QUESTIONS?? 9 Key...

297

Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 May 10, 2012 - 11:53am Addthis The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability will hold its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects will be presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. A draft agenda and online registration are available. In conjunction with the peer review, the Smart Grid R&D Program will hold a discussion forum for principle investigators of current projects and select smart grid experts on June 6, 2012. Input on current capabilities and gap areas in need of future R&D will be used to update the Multi-Year Program Plan.

298

ForPeerReview Microbiology and performance of a methanogenic biofilm reactor during the1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: Biofilm, Anaerobic digestion, Bioreactor start-up, Microbial population21 dynamics, Methanogenesis-00615442,version1-19Aug2011 #12;ForPeerReview 3 Introduction1 Anaerobic digestion is an effective method). The limitation of4 anaerobic digestion processes resides in the duration and instability of their transitory

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

299

The convergence of digital libraries and the peer-review process  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Pre-print repositories have seen a significant increase in use over the past fifteen years across multiple research domains. Researchers are beginning to develop applications capable of using these repositories to assist the scientific community above ... Keywords: OAI-PMH, Open Archives Initiative, peer-review process, pre-print repositories

Marko A. Rodriguez; Johan Bollen; Herbert Van De Sompel

2006-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

300

PEER-REVIEW Detection Of Lateral Non-Uniformities In Fluidized Bed Combustors  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, greatly influences solid circulation patterns and gas phase mixing which inturn affects various in-bed by Dent etal!! in a Fludized bed combustor. For a vertically rising bubble midway through the two sensorsPEER-REVIEW Detection Of Lateral Non-Uniformities In Fluidized Bed Combustors .. A. Venkata Ramayya

Columbia University

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 1 M. J. Gouge  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, and for plasma discharge termination on demand. #12;MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 3 · Gas fueling prototype testing ­ response time experiments for impurity gas puffing into divertor · Pellet fueling development ­ world/s (deuterium) ­ pellet feed/rotor dynamics for centrifuge injector (with CEA) ­ piston and screw extruder

302

Technical/Peer Review Draft May 2006 PART II OVERVIEW1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Technical/Peer Review Draft May 2006 II-1 PART II OVERVIEW1 2 Energy, Industry, and Waste Fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) are used primarily for their concentration of chemical energy is identified as emissions from energy and emissions from industrial21 processes.22 23 Emissions by Month and

303

Review and Selection of Research Projects | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Review and Selection of Research Projects Review and Selection of Research Projects High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Peer Merit / Review Policies Review and Selection of Research Projects Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page All research projects supported by the Office of High Energy Physics (HEP)

304

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen, fuel cell, and vehicle technologies projects at the 2009 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 18-22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Graphic of the Lincoln Memorial lit up at dusk with the text: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting which was held in Arlington, Virginia, on May 18-22, 2009 From here, access presentations and posters from the AMR: Plenary Session Hydrogen Program Vehicle Technologies Program Hydrogen Program

305

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

306

ESS 2012 Peer Review and Update Meeting - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tuesday, September 25 PRE-MEETING REGISTRATION 4:00 pm - 6:00 pm Registration Wednesday, September 26 TIME PROJECT SPEAKER 7:00 am Registration (all day) & Complimentary Breakfast Sponsored by Aquion Energy 8:30 am - Welcome: Georgianne Huff, SNL Session Chair: Dr. Imre Gyuk, DOE 8:35 Welcome and DOE Perspective Dr. Imre Gyuk - US Department of Energy / Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability 8:50 DOE / OE Program Overview Dr. Imre Gyuk - US Department of Energy / Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability

307

ESS 2012 Peer Review - NYSERDA Energy Storage Projects - Dhruv...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Storage Program in the DOE Office of Electricity for its support in this work. LIPA Tariff Time Energy Charge (kWh) Demand Charge (kWmonth) I. Off peak 11pm - 7am...

308

ESS 2012 Peer Review - International Energy Storage Database...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Database Janice Lin Site Admin: storage.exchange@strategen.com; 510-665-7811 Special thanks to the DOE Energy Storage Program and Dr. Imre Gyuk US Department of...

309

2012 SG Peer Review - The Perfect Power Prototype for the Illinois Institute of Technology - Mohmmad Shahidehpour, IIT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Perfect Power Progress Report Perfect Power Progress Report Dr. Mohammad Shahidehpour DOE Peer Review | June 2012 Perfect Power @ IIT Perfect Power @ IIT Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy * $13.6M ($7.6M from DOE, $6M Cost Share) * 5 year project * Located at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) * Involves the entire campus * Partners: IIT, Exelon, S&C Electric, Schweitzer, IPS, Eaton Corporation, ZBB, CIYCOR, Continental Electric, Intelligent Generation This project aligns with the OE mission and the Smart Grid program goals to develop technologies to modernize the electric grid, enhance security and reliability of the energy infrastructure, and facilitate recovery from disruptions to energy supply. Leadership Mohammad Shahidehpour (Principal Investigator) Project Advisor ComEd/Exelon

310

External Peer Review Team Report Underground Testing Area Subproject for Frenchman Flat, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

An external peer review was conducted to review the groundwater models used in the corrective action investigation stage of the Underground Test Area (UGTA) subproject to forecast zones of potential contamination in 1,000 years for the Frenchman Flat area. The goal of the external peer review was to provide technical evaluation of the studies and to assist in assessing the readiness of the UGTA subproject to progress to monitoring activities for further model evaluation. The external peer review team consisted of six independent technical experts with expertise in geology, hydrogeology,'''groundwater modeling, and radiochemistry. The peer review team was tasked with addressing the following questions: 1. Are the modeling approaches, assumptions, and model results for Frenchman Flat consistent with the use of modeling studies as a decision tool for resolution of environmental and regulatory requirements? 2. Do the modeling results adequately account for uncertainty in models of flow and transport in the Frenchman Flat hydrological setting? a. Are the models of sufficient scale/resolution to adequately predict contaminant transport in the Frenchman Flat setting? b. Have all key processes been included in the model? c. Are the methods used to forecast contaminant boundaries from the transport modeling studies reasonable and appropriate? d. Are the assessments of uncertainty technically sound and consistent with state-of-the-art approaches currently used in the hydrological sciences? 3. Are the datasets and modeling results adequate for a transition to Corrective Action Unit monitoring studiesthe next stage in the UGTA strategy for Frenchman Flat? The peer review team is of the opinion that, with some limitations, the modeling approaches, assumptions, and model results are consistent with the use of modeling studies for resolution of environmental and regulatory requirements. The peer review team further finds that the modeling studies have accounted for uncertainty in models of flow and transport in the Frenchman Flat except for a few deficiencies described in the report. Finally, the peer review team concludes that the UGTA subproject has explored a wide range of variations in assumptions, methods, and data, and should proceed to the next stage with an emphasis on monitoring studies. The corrective action strategy, as described in the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, states that the groundwater flow and transport models for each corrective action unit will consider, at a minimum, the following: Alternative hydrostratigraphic framework models of the modeling domain. Uncertainty in the radiological and hydrological source terms. Alternative models of recharge. Alternative boundary conditions and groundwater flows. Multiple permissive sets of calibrated flow models. Probabilistic simulations of transport using plausible sets of alternative framework and recharge models, and boundary and groundwater flows from calibrated flow models. Ensembles of forecasts of contaminant boundaries. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of model outputs. The peer review team finds that these minimum requirements have been met. While the groundwater modeling and uncertainty analyses have been quite detailed, the peer review team has identified several modeling-related issues that should be addressed in the next phase of the corrective action activities: Evaluating and using water-level gradients from the pilot wells at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site in model calibration. Re-evaluating the use of geochemical age-dating data to constrain model calibrations. Developing water budgets for the alluvial and upper volcanic aquifer systems in Frenchman Flat. Considering modeling approaches in which calculated groundwater flow directions near the water table are not predetermined by model boundary conditions and areas of recharge, all of which are very uncertain. Evaluating local-scale variations in hydraulic conductivity on the calculated contaminant boundaries. Evaluat

Sam Marutzky

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

USCMS DOE/NSF Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

February 7-8 , 2006 February 7-8 , 2006 University of California San Diego Charge to the committee [pdf] Main UCSD review page Agenda Logistics Attendees Documentation Agenda: Copies of the slides presented will be available for the meeting. Tuesday February 7, 2006 Start of Meeting 8:30 am Pacific Time (other time zones) Time Title Speaker/Chair Duration 8:30 AM Executive Session 30' 9:00 AM U.S. CMS Overview and CMS Computing [pdf] Lothar Bauerdick 30'+5' 9:35 AM CMS Software and Preparations for Physics[pdf] Avi Yagil 20'+5" 10:00 Coffee 15' 10:15 U.S. CMS S&C Status and Plans[pdf] Ian Fisk 35'+5' 10:55 U.S. CMS Tier-2 Program [pdf] Ken Bloom 20'+5' 11:20 DISUN Status and Plans [pdf] Frank Wuerthwein 20'+5' 11:45 Executive Session 15' 12:00 PM

312

Peer Review of the Hydrogen Program Hydrogen Briefing  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) Program Transferred from NSF to DOE Energy Storage Program in 1978 Hydrogen R&D Program becomes budget. Hydrogen storage system that can provide 6% by weight hydrogen and 250 ­ 400 miles of range. Validate-fossil sources. 3. Initiated a number of collaborations with Wind, CSP and DER programs using energy storage. 4

313

Merit Review of BER Activities at the DOE Laboratories | U.S...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policy Grants & Contracts Guidance Laboratory Scientific Focus Area...

314

2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Puesh Kumar, American Public Power Association  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 San Diego, CA Puesh M. Kumar Director of Engineering & Operations Public Power and APPA * Public power: operated by local governments; reliable, responsive, not-for-profit * 2,000 community-owned electric utilities, 46 million people * Non-profit, non-partisan organization, est. 1940 - Public policy interests - Member services - Reliable electricity at reasonable prices - Proper protection of the environment Public Power in the US 63 648 384 340 308 133 80 30 22 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Less than 10 11 to 1,000 1,001 to 2,000 2,001 to 4000 4,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 20,000 20,001 to 40,000 40,001 - 100,000 More than 100,000 Customers Ser ved Public Power by Number of Customers Served DEED * Demonstration of Energy Efficient Developments * Created in 1980

315

Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1045_Peer Reviews Panel_Lehman Workshop Briefing w-headings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Science Science Peer Reviews 101 Daniel R. Lehman, Director Office of Project Assessment Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Peer Review 101 Panel Members Mr. Daniel Lehman, Director, Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Mr. Hanley Lee, Deputy Manager, SLAC Site Office (formerly SC Federal Project Director for the LCLS Project) Mr. James Krupnick, Associate Lab. Director/Chief Operating Officer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (formerly Project Director for the Molecular Foundry Project) Mr. Scott Samuelson, PMP Acting Director, NNSA Office of Major Systems Acquisitions (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) Office of Science Peer Reviews 101 (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) 2 Office of Science Peer Reviews 101

316

ESS 2012 Peer Review - PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting - Steve Willard, PNM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mexico (PNM) - Mexico (PNM) - PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting DOE Peer Review Steve Willard, P.E. September 26, 2012 Project Goals - Develop an even more Beneficial Renewable Resource - Transferable Nationwide Renewable Resource Transferable Nationwide *Created a dispatchable, renewables-based peaking resource *Combined PV and storage at a substation targeting 15% peak-load reduction D t ti bi ti th t i lt l iti t lt l l *Demonstrating a combination that can simultaneously mitigate voltage-level fluctuations as well as enable load shifting *Developed power system models (baseline and projected), and cost/benefit economic models eco o c ode s *Generating, collecting, analyzing and sharing resultant data *Enabling distributed solutions that reduce GHG emissions through the

317

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ron Melton, Battelle Memorial Institute  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Overview Overview Ron Melton, Ph.D., Project Director Don Hammerstrom, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Battelle, Pacific Northwest Division Presented at DOE-OE Smart Grid R&D Peer Review June 8, 2012 PNWD-SA-9876 Pacific Northwest Demonstration Project What: * $178M, ARRA-funded, 5-year demonstration * 60,000 metered customers in 5 states Why: * Quantify costs and benefits * Develop communications protocol * Develop standards * Facilitate integration of wind and other renewables Who: Led by Battelle and partners including BPA, 11 utilities, 2 universities, and 5 vendors 2 Project Basics 3 Transactive Control Operational objectives Manage peak demand Facilitate renewable resources Address constrained resources Improve system reliability and efficiency Select economical

318

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Logo for the 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, May 15-18, Washington, D.C. Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the DOE Hydrogen Program's Annual Merit Review on May 15-18, 2007 in Washington, D.C. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations Distributed Production Biological Production Separations Electrolysis Photoelectrochemical Production Hi-Temp Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen from Coal Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative Posters Central Biomass Biological Production Compressed/Liquid Tanks

319

Radioactive Waste Isolation in Salt: Peer review of documents dealing with geophysical investigations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Salt Repository Project, a US Department of Energy program to develop a mined repository in salt for high-level radioactive waste, is governed by a complex and sometimes inconsistent array of laws, administrative regulations, guidelines, and position papers. In conducting multidisciplinary peer reviews of contractor documents in support of this project, Argonne National Laboratory has needed to inform its expert reviewers of these governmental mandates, with particular emphasis on the relationship between issues and the technical work undertaken. This report acquaints peer review panelists with the regulatory framework as it affects their reviews of site characterization plans and related documents, including surface-based and underground test plans. Panelists will be asked to consider repository performance objectives and issues as they judge the adequacy of proposed geophysical testing. All site-specific discussions relate to the Deaf Smith County site in Texas, which was approved for site characterization by the President in May 1986. Natural processes active at the Deaf Smith County site and the status of geophysical testing near the site are reviewed briefly. 25 refs., 4 figs., 5 tabs.

McGinnis, L.D.; Bowen, R.H.

1987-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

320

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012 DOE EO 13563 December 2012 Update Report and Burden...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

PEER REVIEWED  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

restaurant initiative to increase availability of healthy menu options in Somerville, Massachusetts:

unknown authors

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

Transparency and Openness in the DOE Quandrennial Technology Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A letter written under the secretary of science, Steven Koonin, to the meeting participants discussing the DOE Quandrennial Technology Review.

323

Peering into a Quantum Well | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Peering into a Quantum Well Peering into a Quantum Well Discovery & Innovation Stories of Discovery & Innovation Brief Science Highlights SBIR/STTR Highlights Contact Information Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5430 09.01.11 Peering into a Quantum Well Supercomputer simulation illuminates mysterious "droop" in solid-state lighting. Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Gallium nitride light-emitting diode. Image courtesy of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Gallium nitride light-emitting diode. Despite being cool, ultra-efficient, and long-lasting, solid-state lighting has yet to conquer the general lighting market partly due to a problem called "efficiency droop." New findings from simulations carried out at

324

Comparative Review FOA Rules for Proposal Submission | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Comparative Review Comparative Review High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Comparative Review Annual Solicitation Progress Reports and Final Report Conferences Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Guidelines Comparative Review Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page

325

SECA CTP Peer Review Oct. 25-26, 2003 Review Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Components 11 * Modeling 3 * Balance of Plant 2 Topical Area Reviewed 0 20 40 60 80 Percentage Materials & Cell Components Modeling Balance of Plant Review Results Materials &...

326

Comparative Review FOA Rules for Proposal Submission | U.S. DOE...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

327

Review and Selection of Research Projects | U.S. DOE Office of...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

328

Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 May 2013 Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities This report summarizes and analyzes the results of independent reviews of IVR and associated processes at eight DOE sites conducted by Independent Oversight from August 2011 to September 2012. The purpose of the Independent Oversight review was to evaluate the processes and methods used for verifying the implementation of safety basis hazard controls and periodically re-verifying that the controls remain in place. Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation

329

Audit of the DOE's Commercial Laboratory Quality Assurance Evaluation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ombudsman FOIA Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work...

330

Microsoft Word - Q2 2010 DOE Report Aug 26.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

engineering peer review and presented results, under the title of Decision and Risk Analysis, to DOE project partners via teleconference on April 8. All design decisions were...

331

Audit Report: DOE/IG-0851 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

332

Inspection Report: DOE-IG-0882 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FOIA Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About...

333

Inspection Report: DOE/IG-0853 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FOIA Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About...

334

Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April 2010 Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April 2010 April 2010 Review of Specific Administrative Controls at DOE Nuclear Facilities The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health Safety and Security occasionally reviews specific focus areas. Focus areas are aspects of safety programs that Independent Oversight determines warrant increased management attention based on reviews of performance data, inspection results, and operating experience across DOE sites. Due, in part, to operating experience and previous inspection results. DOE selected specific administrative controls (SACs) as a focus area. SACs are new or revised technical safety requirements (TSRs)

335

DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review Proceeding before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on DOE's application for a license to construct a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada; DOE moves for interlocutory review of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's order suspending briefing and consideration of DOE's motion to withdraw its application. Yucca Mountain - U.S. Department of Energy's Petition for Interlocutory Review More Documents & Publications Motion to Withdraw from Yucca Mountain application U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL OF THE BOARD'S RULING ON THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW Yucca Mountain - U.S. Department of Energy's Brief in Support of Review and

336

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the 2012 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 14-18 in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Presentations and posters are grouped by topic and subtopic where applicable and appear in the order in which they were presented within those categories. See the 2012 AMR schedule for a full listing of oral presentation and poster presentation dates and times. Plenary Session - Part I: Joint Plenary, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells

337

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the 2011 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 9-13 in Washington, D.C. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Presentations and posters are grouped by topic and subtopic where applicable and appear in the order in which they were presented within those categories. See the 2011 AMR schedule for a full listing of oral presentation and poster presentation dates and times. Joint Plenary Session Plenary Session Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program

338

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the 2013 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 13-17 in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Presentations and posters are grouped by topic and subtopic where applicable and appear in the order in which they were presented within those categories. See the 2013 AMR schedule for a full listing of oral presentation and poster presentation dates and times. Plenary Session - Part I: Joint Plenary, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells

339

2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC - Tom Rizy, ORNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

g g Peer Review Meeting Smart Inverter Controls & Microgrid Interoperation at the Distributed Energy Communications & Controls (DECC) Lab ( ) D. Tom Rizy Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) June 7 th 2012 June 7 th , 2012 Smart Inverter (SI) Controls and Microgrid (MG) Interoperation Microgrid (MG) Interoperation Objectives * D l d SI l f l i l DECC Microgrid * Develop and test SI controls for multiple renewable/nonrenewable DER. * Develop MG controls and communication requirements for high penetration DER. * I l t MG t DECC L b Technical Scope * Implement MG at DECC Lab. * Transfer technology to industry. Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) Prior to FY12 FY13 Out- Technical Scope * Develop advanced smart inverter control consisting of local droop (P-f, Q-V) control integrated with secondary closed

340

Presentation-SNL_RICA-CEDS_Peer_Review_v2a.pptx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems Systems 2010 Peer Review Alexandria, VA July 20-22, 2010 Co-PI: Jason Stamp, Ph.D. Co-PI: Laurie Phillips Sandia National Laboratories Reliability Impacts for Cyber Attack (RICA) Summary Slide: Reliability Impacts for Cyber Attack (RICA) Outcomes:
Quan&ta&ve
impact
analysis of
cyber
a5acks
against
power
grid control
systems
(that
affect
grid
topology and
opera&ons),
including
poten&al mi&ga&on
steps,
using
reliability
metrics. Analyze
large-scale
cases
using
simula&on soCware
in
a
High-Performance Compu&ng
(HPC)
environment. Roadmap
Challenges:
Develop
evidence- based
business
case
to
increase
and shape
investment
in
control
system security.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance for ESS - Vilayanur Viswanathan, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance for Energy Storage Systems D. Conover, V. Viswanathan, K. Bray and M. Kintner-Meyer (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) D. Schoenwald, D. Rose, and S. Ferreira (Sandia National Laboratory) September 28, 2012 USDOE-OE ESS Peer Review Washington, DC Dr. Imre Gyuk - Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Problem Statement The energy storage market is expanding, with a variety of storage technologies available The lack of a uniform way to evaluate energy storage system (ESS) performance is causing confusion in the market Without an accepted basis for comparing ESS performance, the application and use of storage technology will be hampered

342

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium Intercalation Battery for Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012 David Ofer Ofer.david@tiaxllc.com Washington DC, September 27, 2012 Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Background and Purpose 2 Large-scale stationary energy storage for integration with renewables and for off-peak energy capture is a new application requiring new rechargeable batteries. * New combination of requirements - Long cycle life under deep cycling use profile - High cycling efficiency - Moderate rate capability - Very low cost - No requirement for particularly high specific energy or energy density * TIAX is developing a novel Na-ion battery - Leverages teachings of Li-ion technology - Targets novel low-cost chemistry and cell design

343

DOE Review of Regulations- Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is pleased to submit these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on how DOE can best review its existing regulations and to identify whether any...

344

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE 13563 and ICR Report - Final.pdf More Documents & Publications...

345

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

xxxvi | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Hydrogen Production and Delivery ........................................................................................................... 7 PD-014: Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Analysis .................................................................................. 10 PD-022: Fiber-Reinforced Composite Pipelines ........................................................................................ 14 PD-025: Hydrogen Embrittlement of Structural Steels .............................................................................. 20

346

Review of DOE HQ Emergency Response Plans and Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance March 2003 Prepared by Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of...

347

Literature Review of Uncertainty of Analysis Methods, (DOE-2 Program), Report to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This literature review covers the DOE-2 simulation program, which is one of the legacy programs in the ESLs Emissions Calculator (eCalc), a web-based emissions reductions calculator. The eCalc program is a tool for those who want to see how their energy savings have reduced NOx emissions, which are produced by on-site combustion of natural gas, or at fossil-fuel burning power plants that supply the electricity. This report includes a brief history of the development of the DOE-2 program, and includes an analysis of the reported accuracies of the DOE-2 program. For the validation of the DOE-2 program, peer-reviewed literature that presented case studies using one of three methodologies (empirical, comparative, or analytical) were reviewed and summarized.

Haberl, J. S.; Cho, S.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energys (DOEs) May 15, 2012 request for comments and information regarding regulations that...

349

Physics Procedia 34 (2012) 70 79 1875-3892 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of the Organising Committee of the CSP 2012  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

/or peer review under responsibility of the Organising Committee of the CSP 2012 Conference. doi:10.1016/j

Berthier, Ludovic

351

Independent Oversight Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance, March 2003 Independent Oversight Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance, March 2003 The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted a review of emergency response plans and performance at DOE Headquarters (HQ) in February 2003. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the readiness and effectiveness of the DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) emergency response teams for a postulated emergency at a field site, and the HQ Incident Command Team for an emergency affecting the Forrestal building. In addition, OA was tasked to evaluate the current status of DOE's Continuity of Operations (COOP) program plans and provide recommendations

352

NERSC/DOE HEP 2012 Review Logistics  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NERSC HPC Achievement Awards Home Science at NERSC HPC Requirements Reviews High Energy Physics (HEP) Logistics Hotel Information Location The review will be held at...

353

Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 DOE Hydrogen 1 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and

354

Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Hydrogen DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and

355

Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Hydrogen DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and

356

Report of the Peer Review Panel on the early site suitability evaluation of the Potential Repository Site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada; Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Yucca mountain Site Characterization Project Office (YMPO) assigned Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), the Technical and Management Support Services (T&MSS) contractor to the YmPo, the task of conducting an Early Site Suitability Evaluation (ESSE) of the Yucca mountain site as a potential site for a high-level radioactive waste repository. First, the assignment called for the development of a method to evaluate a single site against the DOE General Guidelines for Recommendation of Sites for Nuclear Waste Repositories, 10 CFR Part 960. Then, using this method, an evaluation team, the ESSE Core Team, of senior YMP scientists, engineers, and technical experts, evaluated new information obtained about the site since publication of the final Environmental Assessment (DOE, 1986) to determine if new suitability/unsuitability findings could be recommended. Finally, the Core Team identified further information and analyses needed to make final determinations for each of the guidelines. As part of the task, an independent peer review of the ESSE report has been conducted. Expertise was solicited that covered the entire spectrum of siting guidelines in 10 CFR Part 960 in order to provide a complete, in-depth critical review of the data evaluated and cited in the ESSE report, the methods used to evaluate the data, and the conclusions and recommendations offered by the report. Fourteen nationally recognized technical experts (Table 2) served on the Peer Review Panel. The comments from the Panel and the responses prepared by the ESSE Core Team, documented on formal Comment Response Forms, constitute the body of this document.

NONE

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

357

Assessment of Financial Savings from Peer Reviews of In-Progress Projects: A Case Study from the Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Financial Savings Financial Savings From Peer Reviews of In-Progress Projects: A Case Study from the Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program Prepared By: Yaw O. Agyeman, TMS, Inc. with Jeff Dowd, DOE Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Prepared for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy October 2008 Acknowledgments: Special thanks go to the following people who provided inputs to the study or review comments on an earlier draft of this paper. * EERE Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program - JoAnn Milliken, Nancy Garland, Sunita Satyapal, Antonio Ruiz, Roxanne Garland, and John Garbak. * Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis - Darrell Beschen and Randy Steer. * National Renewable Energy Laboratory - Neil Snyder and Bill Babiuch.

358

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

VALIDATION VALIDATION 380 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Technology Validation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Technology Validation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Technology Validation Program: In general, the reviewers believed the program area was adequately covered. The role of the Technology Validation program within the structure of the Fuel Cell Technologies Office was clearly identified. Progress relating to projects was clearly presented and plans were identified for addressing issues and challenges. The partnership with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL's) data collection/analysis team was seen as key to the success

359

Joint DOE/NSF Review of U.S. LHC Software and Computing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Joint DOENSF Review of U.S. LHC Software and Computing January 16-17, 2003 at LBNL Purpose: Independent peer review of the U.S. LHC Software and Computing projects to continue...

360

A Review of DOE/NETLs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

China Workshop on Mercury Control from Coal Combustion, October 31-November 2, 2005, Beijing, China Fate of Mercury in Coal Byproducts from DOE's Mercury Control Technology Field...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Independent Oversight Review, DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 April 2013 Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities This report provides lessons learned from the 2012 reviews performed by Independent Oversight. The reviews performed during the fall of 2011 and throughout 2012 were at DOE/NNSA sites with hazard category 1 and 2 nuclear facilities, some of which also have significant quantities of hazardous chemicals on site. The purpose of the Independent Oversight review was to determine the state of emergency preparedness of selected sites by examining the sites' processes for evaluating plausible severe NPEs;

362

Independent peer review panel report on the integrated nonthermal treatment systems study and the comparison of integrated thermal and integrated nonthermal treatment systems for mixed low level waste  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) Office of Science and Technology (OST) has conducted studies of integrated thermal treatment systems and integrated nonthermal treatment systems (INTS) for treating contact handled, alpha and non-alpha mixed low level radioactive waste (MLLW). The MLLW in the DOE complex consists of a wide variety of organic and inorganic solids and liquids contaminated with radioactive substances. Treatment systems are needed to destroy organic material and stabilize residues prior to land disposal. In May 1996 the Deputy Assistant Secretary for OST appointed an Independent Peer Review Panel to: (1) review and comment on the INTS Study; (2) make recommendations on the most promising thermal and nonthermal treatment systems; (3) make recommendations on research and development necessary to prove the performance of nonthermal and thermal technologies; and (4) review and comment on the preliminary draft of the ITTS/INTS Comparison Report. This report presents the primary conclusions and recommendations based on the review of the INTS study and the comparison report. System selection, overviews, comparisons, cost estimations and sensitivity analyses, and recommended R and D engineering needs are then described and discussed.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

363

Independent Oversight Review, DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Headquarters Facilities - March DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 Independent Oversight Review, DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 March 2002 Review of the Headquarters Facilities Emergency Response Plans The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance conducted a review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters facilities emergency response plans in February 2002. The purpose of this review was to assess the Department's readiness to respond to emergency events, such as fires and hazardous material releases (inside and outside the building), that occur at any of the following facilities: the two primary DOE Headquarters facilities, namely, the James V. Forrestal building, which is located in Washington, D.C., and the main Germantown, Maryland, facility; and the 270 Corporate Center and Cloverleaf

364

DOE OIG Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2003-2008 | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

365

Review of DOE HQ Emergency Response Plans and Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance March 2003 Prepared by Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT AND PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE REVIEW OF DOE HEADQUARTERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS AND PERFORMANCE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted a review of emergency response plans and performance at DOE Headquarters (HQ) in February 2003. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the readiness and effectiveness of the DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) emergency response teams for a postulated emergency at a field site, and the HQ Incident Command Team for an emergency affecting the Forrestal building. In addition,

366

DOE Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Safety |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Safety DOE Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Safety July 1, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Kevin Dressman, director of the DOE Office of Worker Safety and Health Enforcement, addresses LATA Kentucky employees during a training session. The June regulatory assistance review was aimed at ensuring worker safety. Kevin Dressman, director of the DOE Office of Worker Safety and Health Enforcement, addresses LATA Kentucky employees during a training session. The June regulatory assistance review was aimed at ensuring worker safety. PADUCAH, Ky. - DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security headquarters representatives recently spent three days at the Paducah site helping EM cleanup contractor LATA Kentucky better identify and correct issues before

367

DOE-STD-3006-95; DOE Standard Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3006-95 3006-95 November 1995 SUPERSEDING DOE-STD-3006-93 November 1993 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-3006-95 i PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) FOREWORD 1. DOE 0 425.1 establishes the requirement to conduct Operational Readiness Reviews

368

RD&I meeting Review DOE Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23,...

369

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Proceedings The Annual Merit Review provides an opportunity for peer evaluation of the projects funded by the Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program. An opening plenary...

370

DOE Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dataset on its Environmental Reviews Dataset on its Environmental Reviews DOE Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews January 28, 2010 - 1:44pm Addthis Washington, DC - To further transparency and openness in its implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Department of Energy (DOE) has created a comprehensive database of categorical exclusion (CX) determinations. The information is available at Data.gov and the DOE NEPA Website. This initiative supports the Obama Administration's Open Government Directive and provides easy access to useful information regarding DOE's compliance with NEPA. "This sets a new standard of transparency for the Federal government's implementation of NEPA," said Scott Blake Harris, DOE General Counsel, "and shines a light on an important part of our

371

DOE Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews DOE Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews January 28, 2010 - 1:44pm Addthis Washington, DC - To further transparency and openness in its implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Department of Energy (DOE) has created a comprehensive database of categorical exclusion (CX) determinations. The information is available at Data.gov and the DOE NEPA Website. This initiative supports the Obama Administration's Open Government Directive and provides easy access to useful information regarding DOE's compliance with NEPA. "This sets a new standard of transparency for the Federal government's implementation of NEPA," said Scott Blake Harris, DOE General Counsel, "and shines a light on an important part of our

372

DoE CBM Review 03-12-2012 final  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Condition Based Monitoring of Gas Turbine Combustion Components Program Review Nancy Ulerich Ph.D. Getnet Kidane Nikolai Tevs Ph.D. Siemens Energy, Inc. DoE Funding Opportunity No....

373

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE O 425.1D through PXSO Procedure 425.1BC, Pantex Site Office Startup and Restart of Pantex Plant Activities to provide PXSO confidence that the readiness review program is...

374

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PROGRAM COMMENTS PROGRAM COMMENTS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 529 Program Comments Provided by Reviewers Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Comments Hydrogen Production 1. Was the program area adequately covered? Were important issues and challenges identified? Was progress clearly presented in comparison to the previous year? (Include information presented in the plenary and/or session overview presentations of the program if appropriate.) The Hydrogen Production program area was very well covered-the important issues (including material performance and capital costs for all production pathways) and challenges were clearly described and progress was shown on examples for all research fields (including novel hydrogen production methods)

375

ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Battery Component Development - Wei Wang, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Battery Component Development Wei Wang, Qingtao Luo, Xiaoliang Wei, Bin Li, Zimin Nie, Baowei Chen, Yuyan Shao, Vijayakumar Murugesan, Amy Chen, Gordon, Xia, Liyu Li, Gary Z. Yang, Vincent Sprenkle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Boulevard P. O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352, USA DOE Stationary Energy Storage Program Review, Washington, DC Sept. 26-28, 2012 Dr. Imre Gyuk 1 2 Review of previous work 2.5M, ~30Wh/L, -5~50 o C Mixed-acid VRB Double Energy Density Extend temperature window Charge Discharge Charge Discharge Charge Discharge Catholyte: VO 2+ + Cl - + H 2 O - e VO 2 Cl + 2H + ε co =1.0 V Anolyte: V 3+ + e V 2+ ε ao =-0.25 Overall: VO 2+ + Cl

376

Accident analysis and safety review of DOE Category B reactors  

SciTech Connect

DOE is employing the principle of comparability with the NRC requirements to guide its safety program. Since the safety record of research reactors licensed by the NRC has been established and accepted, the comparison of DOE Orders applicable to DOE research reactors with the NRC regulations applicable to research reactors would identify strengths and weaknesses of the DOE Orders. The comparison was made in 14 general topics of safety which are labeled Areas of Safety Concerns. This paper focuses on the Area of accident analysis and safety review and presents recommendations in these areas. 12 refs.

Kimura, C.Y.

1990-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

377

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

D: PROJECTS NOT REVIEWED D: PROJECTS NOT REVIEWED 552 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report List of Projects Not Reviewed Project ID Project Title Principal Investigator Name Organization PD-004 Distributed Bio-Oil Reforming Stefan Czernik National Renewable Energy Laboratory PD-013 Electrolyzer Development for the Copper-Chlorine Thermochemical Cycle Michele Lewis Argonne National Laboratory PD-016 Oil-Free Centrifugal Hydrogen Compression Technology Demonstration Hooshang Heshmat Mohawk Innovative Technology PD-017 Development of a Centrifugal Hydrogen Pipeline Gas Compressor Frank Di Bella Concepts NREC PD-021 Development of High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Tank for Storage and Gaseous Truck Delivery Don Baldwin Hexagon Lincoln PD-027 Solar High-Temperature Water Splitting

378

Summary of DOE/PERF water program review.  

SciTech Connect

For many years, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has supported and sponsored various types of water research relating to the oil and gas industry through its Office of Fossil Energy and its National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). In early 2005, the Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (PERF) submitted a proposal to DOE for funding an upcoming PERF meeting that would feature water research in the petroleum industry. PERF is a nonprofit organization created in 1986 to provide a stimulus to and a forum for the collection, exchange, and analysis of research information related to the development of technology concerning the petroleum industry, and a mechanism for establishing joint research projects in that field. Additional information on PERF can be accessed at http://www.perf.org. DOE agreed to provide funding to hold a review of its water research program in conjunction with the fall 2005 PERF meeting. Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) was asked to coordinate and host the meeting, which was referred to as the DOE/PERF Water Program Review. The program review was held on November 1-4, 2005, in Annapolis, Maryland, at the Historic Inns of Annapolis. The purpose of the program review was to provide a forum for sharing information, reviewing current programs (especially recent unpublished research), and reviewing industry and regulatory needs regarding water use and reuse issues. PERF and DOE/NETL can use this information to plan for future water-related research projects. The water program review provided a unique opportunity in several ways. First, DOE was able to have all of the contractors currently receiving DOE funds for water research present in one room at the same time. Each contractor described his or her research and was able to learn about the research being conducted by the other researchers. Second, this forum allowed representatives of many large oil and gas companies to hear about the DOE research projects and offer their reactions to DOE and the researchers. Third, most oil and gas meetings focus on either upstream (the exploration and production sector) or downstream (the refining sector) issues. Typically, there is little overlap in content between the two industry sectors. At the program review, attendees with upstream and downstream orientations were able to spend much of their time in joint sessions and could learn more about the other sector.

Veil, J.; Gasper, J.; Puder, M.; Leath, P.; Environmental Science Division

2006-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

379

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electric Power Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demonstration Project Jodi Startari Ashlawn Energy LLC Briefing Overview * Painesville Municipal Electric Power Plant Project Synopsis * Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Technology * City of Painesville Municipal Electric Plant History * Project Multiple Objectives and Additional Detail * Project Risk Analysis presented at previous Peer Review * Project to date progress * Cost Distribution * Summary/Conclusions * Future Tasks * Questions US Produced Vanadium Redox Flow Battery for Bulk Storage, Peak Shaving * 8 MW Hour redox flow battery (1MW 8 hours) * To be installed at Painesville Municipal Electric Plant (PMEP), a 32 MW coal fired facility * Most efficient PMEP operation is steady state at 26 MW (lowest emissions, lowest operating cost)

380

2012 CERTS LAAR Program Peer Review - Load as a Regulation Resource, Phase 2 - Sila Kiliccote, LBNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group Load as a Regulation Resource Sila Kiliccote, Jason MacDonald, Livio Fenga and Dave Watson Demand Response Research Center Grid Integration Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory http://drrc.lbl.gov CERTS review September 20, 2012 Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group Outline  Phase 1 summary - Overview of OpenADR - Major Phase 1 accomplishments  Project objectives  Tasks and major technical accomplishments completed  Deliverables and schedule  Risk Factors  Follow-on Work Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group What is OpenADR and how does it work? Signaling- continuous, 2-way, secure messaging system for dynamic prices, emergency and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications Daiwon Choi, Vilayanur V. Viswanathan, Wei Wang, Vincent L. Sprenkle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Blvd., P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352, USA DOE Energy Storage Program Review, Washington, DC Sept. 26-28, 2012 Acknowledgment: Dr. Imre Gyuk - Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability  Investigate the Li-ion battery for stationary energy storage unit in ~kWh level.  Fabrication and optimization of LiFePO 4 / Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 18650 cell.  Li-ion battery energy storage with effective thermal management.  Improve rate and cycle life of Li-ion battery.  Screen possible new cathode/anode electrode materials and its combinations

382

2012 CERTS LAAR Program Peer Review - Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation - Nasr Alkadi, ORNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nasr Alkadi, Ph.D. Nasr Alkadi, Ph.D. Michael Starke, PhD Oak Ridge National Laboratory CERTS Internal Program Review FY12 DOE-CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation September 20, 2012 2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Project objective: Scoping of Regulation Reserves in Industrial Sector 2 Alcoa's Smelting Process is a significant regulation asset at Warrick, IN. * Alcoa has demonstrated Regulation Band in the 50 MW range (25/25) * Represents ~10% of BL of 500 MW) 1. Develop an estimate of the amount of regulation that could reasonably be expected from industrial loads based on publicly available information. 2. Analyze the potential impact of regulation on the manufacturing process.

383

Vehicle Technologies Office: 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2012 DOE Hydrogen and 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer

384

CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments highlighting four issues: 1. DOE's Regulatory Coordination & Harmonization Responsibilities; 2. The Cumulative Costs of Regulations; 3. Retrospective Review of Regulations; and 4. Stakeholder Participation. DOE REGULATORY COORDINATION & HARMONIZATION RESPONSIBILITIES

385

Peering Information  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peering Information Network Overview Tools Peering Information Interactive Network Map Network Maps Connected Sites Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US)...

386

Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December December 2000 A Report to the Secretary of Energy Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites OVERSIGHT Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................... 5 2.0 Summary of Review Results .............................................................. 8 2.1 Wildland Fire Management Policy ............................................. 8 2.2 Fire/Emergency Hazards Assessments ....................................... 9 2.3 Wildland Fire Prevention and Response .................................. 11 2.4 Offsite Interfaces and Agreements ........................................... 13 2.5 Feedback and Continuous Improvement

387

2010 Solar Program Peer Review Report: An Independent Evaluation of Program Activities for FY2009 and FY2010  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of experts at the DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program's 2010 Program Review meeting, held on May 24?27, 2010, in Washington, D.C.

DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

ORISE: Providing Support for DOE Scientific Research  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Decision-Makers The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) serves as the primary coordinator of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science peer reviews....

389

DOE directives: Improving contractor review and compliance systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Department of Energy contractors are regulated by DOE directives. Rigorous and effective contractor administrative systems to review directives and document compliance are essential. WINCO recognized the need to improve its directives review system. Three areas have been addressed: Computerized tracking, documentation of the review itself--at the requirement rather then the directive level, and the role of the directives administrator. The result is a system that generates and captures information for use in the company rather than simply creating files and that attest to work accomplished.

Airmet, D.

1990-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

390

NETL: 2010 Conference Proceedings - DOE/EPA Collaborative Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE/EPA Collaborative Review - Tracking Geologically - Sequestered CO2: Monitoring, Verification, & Accounting (MVA), Simulation, and Risk Assessment DOE/EPA Collaborative Review - Tracking Geologically - Sequestered CO2: Monitoring, Verification, & Accounting (MVA), Simulation, and Risk Assessment March 23-24, 2010 Table of Contents Disclaimer Presentations PRESENTATIONS Welcoming Remarks Bill Aljoe, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory Program Overview [PDF-1.2MB] Sean Plasynski, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory Program Overview [PDF-954KB] Barbara Klieforth, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Research Session 1 - Risk Assessment Overview of DOE National Risk Assessment Program for CO2 Sequestration [PDF-2.1MB] George Guthrie, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory Risks Posed by Brines Containing Dissolved Carbon Dioxide [PDF-1.3MB]

391

DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review The U.S. Department of Energy has issued for public review and comment a draft environmental assessment of the potential environmental impacts of building an internal road to safely ship radioactive material within the Idaho National Laboratory. DOE�s preferred alternative under the environmental assessment is to develop a new, internal road that would connect the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center with the Materials and Fuels Complex, a distance of about 20 miles. It would allow the INL to safely ship nuclear materials from the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center and the Materials and Fuels Complex without having to utilize public roads, like Highway 20, which adds additional cost and security considerations to each shipment.

392

DOE - NETL Internal Program Review - June 10, 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D DOE-CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D Internal Program Review: Load as a Resource (LAAR) September 20, 2012 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Building 90 Room TBD: signage will be posted at the building entrance Agenda 8:00 am Light refreshments available Welcome, Introductions, DOE remarks Phil Overholt, DOE, and Joe Eto, LBNL 8:30 Frequency Responsive Demand Jeff Dagle, PNNL 9:10 Frequency Responsive Load Evaluation and Benefits on Power System Grid Isabelle Snyder, ORNL (by phone) 9:50 Break 10:20 Load as a Regulation Resource, Phase 2 Sila Kiliccote, LBNL 11:00 Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation Nasr Alkadi, ORNL 11:40 Integration and Extension of Direct Load Management of Smart Loads Anna Scaglioni, UC Davis

393

DOE | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

DOE DOE Home DOE Wind Vision Community Description: The DOE Wind Program, in close cooperation with the wind industry, is launching a new initiative to revisit the findings of the 2008 DOE 20% The DOE Wind Program, in close cooperation with the wind industry, is launching a new initiative to revisit the findings of the 2008 DOE 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report, and to develop a renewed vision for U.S. wind power research, development, and deployment. Included in this effort will be: community DOE forum Wind Graham7781's picture Submitted by Graham7781(1992) Super contributor 26 April, 2013 - 11:05 OpenEI Showcased in Geothermal Exploration Best Practices Workshop DOE geothermal GTO OpenEI This week, Denver hosted the US DOE Geothermal Technologies Office (GTO) 2013 Peer Review. The purpose of the peer review is to offer geothermal

394

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 15, 2013 February 15, 2013 Agency/ Sub- agency RIN/ OMB Control Number Title of Initiative/ Rule/lCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits Progress updates and anticipated accomplish- ments Notes DOE/GC N/A Request for information on reducing regulatory burden DOE is continually engaging in review of its rules to determine whether there are burdens on the public that can be avoided by amending or rescinding existing requirements. To that end, while DOE is always open to receiving information about the impact of its regulations, it published this RFI to solicit public input. August 8, 2012 (77 FR 47328) This information solicitation is expected

395

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Low-Cost, High-Performance Hybrid Membranes...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DESIGN 2008 www.PosterPresentations.com Low-Cost, High-Performance Hybrid Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries Hongxing Hu, Amsen Technologies LLC DOE SBIR Project, Program...

396

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Estimation of Capital and Levelized Cost for Redox Flow Batteries - Vilayanur Viswanathan, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Estimation of Capital and Levelized Estimation of Capital and Levelized Cost for Redox Flow Batteries V. Viswanathan, A. Crawford, L. Thaller 1 , D. Stephenson, S. Kim, W. Wang, G. Coffey, P. Balducci, Z. Gary Yang 2 , Liyu Li 2 , M. Kintner-Meyer, V. Sprenkle 1 Consultant 2 UniEnergy Technology September 28, 2012 USDOE-OE ESS Peer Review Washington, DC Dr. Imre Gyuk - Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability 1 What are we trying to accomplish? PNNL grid analytics team has established ESS cost targets for various applications PNNL cost/performance model estimates cost for redox flow battery systems of various chemistries drives research internally to focus on most important components/parameters/metrics for cost reduction and performance improvement

397

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

A: ATTENDEE LIST A: ATTENDEE LIST FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 511 Attendee List: 2013 Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Last Name First Name Organization Abdel-Baset Tarek Chrysler Group LLC Abraham Judi Conference Management Associates, Inc. Aceves Salvador Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Adams Jesse U.S. Department of Energy, Golden Field Office Adzic Radoslav Brookhaven National Laboratory Afzal Kareem PDC Machines Agar Ertan Drexel University Agrawal Nisha Defense Production Act Committee Ahluwalia Rajesh Argonne National Laboratory Ahmed Aysha National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ahmed Shabbir Argonne National Laboratory Ahn Channing U.S. Department of Energy (IPA from California Institute of Technology) Ahn Sang Hyun National Institute of Standards and Technology

398

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: AEP Ohio gridSMART Demonstration Project - Karen Sloneker, Columbus Southern Power (AEP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting AEP Ohio gridSMART ® Demonstration Project Karen Sloneker AEP Ohio gridSMART Project Director ® December 2008 AEP Ohio gridSMART ® Demonstration Project Objectives * To build an integrated secure smart grid infrastructure. * Attract, educate, enlist and retain consumers using innovative business models that provide tools to reduce costs, consumption and peak demand. * Gather data on technology and smart grid business models to forecast national impact. Life-cycle Funding 2010 - 2013 $73,660,317 Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) * 110,000 AMI meters and associated infrastructure * Consumer Managed Energy Technology (experimental tariffs, consumer programs, web portal; smart appliances, and plug-in electric vehicles) * Innovative Demand Management * Distribution Automation and Reliability

399

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Sodium Ion Battery for Grid Level Applications - Ted Wiley, Aquion Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Progress Report Progress Report Smart Grid Demonstration Program Ted Wiley, Jay Whitacre Department of Energy Peer Review 26 September, 2012 Confidential Information of Aquion Energy, Inc. 2 Thanks to Our Supporters Confidential Information of Aquion Energy, Inc. 3 About Aquion Energy Founded on the belief that stationary energy storage must be: * Safe: Non-toxic and immune to catastrophic failure events * Reliable: Long lasting and capable of operating in abusive environments * Affordable: Made from abundant, simple materials via a scalable manufacturing process This principle demands a new type of energy storage: Aqueous Hybrid Ion Batteries Designed for stationary, long-duration applications * Utilities-various grid services * Microgrids-telco, mining, commercial/residential solar, military,

400

2012 SG Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Robert Boehm, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

S S t G id P 2012 Smart Grid Program Peer Review Meeting "D ti D d R d ti "Dramatic Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest" Robert F Boehm Robert F. Boehm Center for Energy Research University of Nevada Las Vegas June 8, 2012 "Dramatic Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest" in the Desert Southwest Objective Decrease the peak electrical demand by 65% over code-built houses in a new development of 185 homes. Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY08 - FY13 (now FY15) Technical Scope 1. Build energy conserving residences. 2. Include PV on the residences. FY08 - FY13 (now FY15) $6948k 3. Develop a demand control system that gives the customer options and that is enhanced by an artificial intelligence supplemental system. Instantaneous December 2008 power pricing information will be available

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Scientometric analysis of publications in the area of nanoenergy based on the materials of the peer-reviewed journal of VINITI RAS Physics of Nanoobjects and Nanotechnology  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Based on the analysis of a range of key publications in the area of nanoenergy, which, among other journals, were reflected in the Physics of Nanoobjects and Nanotechnology issue of the peer-reviewed journal that was published by the All-Russia ... Keywords: nanoenergy, nanomaterials, nanoobjects, nanophysics, scientometrics, solar cells

N. M. Builova; A. I. Osipov

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

Reviews | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reviews Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Reviews NP Early Career Opportunities & Awardees Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » Funding Opportunities Reviews Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page To ensure that funding is allocated as efficiently as possible, the NP program has developed a system of planning and priority setting that relies heavily on input from groups of outside experts. NP has also instituted a

403

Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process Final Report December 2001 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. CONTENTS Summary Objectives International perspective Recommendations for future assessments 1 Introduction 1.1 Background to the Yucca Mountain Project 1.2 Terms of reference, objectives and scope of the review 1.3 Conduct of the review 1.4 Organisation of this report 2 General Considerations 2.1 Regulatory perspective 2.2 Performance assessment rationale 2.3 General approach to performance assessment 2.4 Documentation 3 Sub-system methodology 3.1 Repository design

404

2012 SG Peer Review - University of Hawaii Renewable and Distributed Systems - Jay Griffin, Univ. of Hawaii  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE RDSI Maui Smart Grid Project DOE RDSI Maui Smart Grid Project James "Jay" Griffin, PhD Hawai'i Natural Energy Institute University of Hawai'i at Manoa June 7, 2012 December 2008 DOE RDSI Maui Smart Grid Project Managing Distribution Energy Resources (DER) for Transmission- and Distribution-Level Benefits Objectives Life-cycle Funding ($k) FY09 - FY13 Project Budget DOE: Cost Share: $ 6,995 $ 7,383 Total: $ 14,383 OBJECTIVES D, T Reduce distribution circuit loading and transmission congestion D Help consumers better manage energy use D Improve service quality D, T Use more as-available renewable energy resources (wind and solar PV) D Demonstrate flexible, expandable, architecture compatible with legacy systems TECHNICAL SCOPE Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) * load research * power quality monitoring

405

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Acid Based Blend Membranes for Redox Flow...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acid Based Blend Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries DOE Grant No: DE-SC0006306 Alan Cisar* and Chris Rhodes Lynntech, Inc., 2501 Earl Rudder Freeway South, College Station, TX...

406

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-EPRI Energy Storage Handbook in Collaborati...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Abbas Akhil Dr. Imre Gyuk and the Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability support is gratefully acknowledged. Electricity Storage Handbook ...

407

An Interested-based Architecture for Peer-to-Peer Network Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Improving search performance is an important issue in peer-to-peer (P2P) network systems. Although Distributed Hash Tables (DHTs) route queries more efficiently than flooding does, it's complicated for DHTs to support keyword-based searches. Emerging ... Keywords: overlay networks, peer-to-peer networks,Interest groups

Wen-Tsuen Chen; Chi-Hong Chao; Jeng-Long Chiang

2006-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of Energy NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of...

409

DOE … NETL Internal Program Review … June 10, 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OE TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY PROGRAM OE TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY PROGRAM North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) and Advanced Applications Research and Development (AARD) Internal Program Review June 27-28, 2013 L'Enfant Plaza Hotel | 480 L'Enfant Plaza Hotel SW, Washington, DC 20024 RENOIR ROOM-Second Floor Meeting logistics: Dana Robson, LBNL (cell: 415-335-1679) Draft Agenda Thursday, June 27 (Day 1) 7:30 am Morning refreshments available 8:00 am Welcome, Introductions, DOE remarks Joe Eto, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Phil Overholt, US DOE, OE Transmission Reliability Program SESSION I (all sessions allow 20 minutes for presentations/10 minutes for Q&A) 8:30 am Baselining Studies and Analysis Bharat Bhargava, Electric Power Group 9:00 am Baselining Studies and Analysis

410

1992 DOE/Sandia crystalline photovoltaic technology project review meeting  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document serves as the proceedings for the annual project review meeting held by Sandia National Laboratories` Photovoltaic Technology and Photovoltaic Evaluation Departments. It contains information supplied by organizations making presentations at the meeting, which was held July 14--15, 1992 at the Sheraton Old Town Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Overview sessions covered the Department of Energy (DOE) program, including those at Sandia and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), and non-DOE programs, including the EPRI concentrator collector program, The Japanese crystalline silicon program, and some concentrating photovoltaic activities in Europe. Additional sessions included papers on Sandia`s Photovoltaic Device Fabrication Laboratory`s collaborative research, cell processing research, the activities of the participants in the Concentrator Initiative Program, and photovoltaic technology evaluation at Sandia and NREL.

Maish, A. [ed.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

DoE CBM Review 03-12-2012 final  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Condition Based Monitoring of Gas Condition Based Monitoring of Gas Turbine Combustion Components Program Review Nancy Ulerich Ph.D. Getnet Kidane Nikolai Tevs Ph.D. Siemens Energy, Inc. DoE Funding Opportunity No. DE-PS26-08NT00440-1B DoE Award Cooperative Agreement No. DE-NT0006833 March 2012 03-14-2012 2 Siemens Energy, Inc. Gas Turbine Combustion Section Online Condition Monitoring Needs Compressor Combustor Turbine Hot section combustion components of gas turbine engine are exposed to harsh operating conditions and high temperatures. As a result, combustion parts have shorter design lives and more frequent maintenance inspection interval requirements than other parts of the turbine engine. Frequent maintenance inspection outages affect engine availability and reliability. Use of sensor technology that directly detect and monitor hardware life online can

412

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty & Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty & High Renewable Penetration: Representing Market Response using a Multi-stage Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse Model Approach with Recourse Benjamin F. Hobbs & Francisco Munoz Geography & Environmental Engineering Applied Math & Stat Geography & Environmental Engineering, Applied Math & Stat. Environment, Energy, Sustainability & Health Institute The Johns Hopkins University Richard E Schuler Richard E. Schuler Civil & Environmental Engineering, and Economics Cornell University August 2, 2011 Thanks to Saamrat Kasina and Harry van der Weijde for their assistance, and DOE CERTS for funding and DOE CERTS for funding O i Overview 1. The problem 1. The problem

413

R:\\Eco SSL\\Guidance Document\\Final Peer Review Draft Sent to...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of uncontaminated sites (Table 2-2). Logarithm of Toxicity Threshold Values N u m b e r critical review of soil criteria methods 2-6 Table 2-2. Assessment factors for...

414

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Solid State Li Metal Batteries for Grid...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Review 2012 Mohit Singh, VP R&D and Engineering Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program from the Department of Energy through the National Energy Technology...

415

TUCAP-ETO-STATCOM Project Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW 11/02/06 ETO Light Power Converter for FACTS & Energy Storage Applications Principal Investigator: Prof Alex Q. Huang Semiconductor Power Electronics Center (SPEC) North Carolina State University, Raleigh SNL Project Manager: Stan Atcitty DOE Manager: Dr. Imre Gyuk 2 DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW 11/02/06 Develop a modular VSC for multiple FACTS and energy storage applications with goals of achieving 1. Lower cost * Using lower cost power devices * Reducing component parts * Modular approach 2. Higher reliability * Reducing components parts 3. High power density * Better utilization of silicon * Reducing component parts FY2006 Project Objectives 3 DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW 11/02/06 ETO Light TM Power Converter Light triggered ETO 4500V/4000A 2 kW heatpipe

416

Microsoft PowerPoint - Peer Review Results Overview 3-03.ppt  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

63 28 4 3.a 116 1 14 58 27 0 3.b 112 2 7 70 22 3 4.a 113 1 13 68 18 3 Sub-Total 649 8 51 413 151 24 Government (non-DOE) No Rating Not at All Marginal Significant Superior...

417

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage in the Southeast - Jim Ellison, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initial Results Initial Results a Objectives * Determine whether energy storage can reduce the costs of delivering electricity in a coal-heavy, vertically integrated system that does not expect significant renewables deployment. Is there a business case? * Determine whether there is a business case for energy storage in the face of: * coal unit shutdowns * Increases in natural gas pricing * How does a high resolution (5-10 min) model affect these results? * Can regulation requirements be reduced from current rule of thumb? What role can energy storage play? What is the value of energy storage in a coal-heavy vertically integrated system? Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed

418

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Controls for Grid Stability - Ray Byrne, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Controls for Energy Storage Controls for Grid Stability Wednesday, September 26, 2012 Ray Byrne, Ph.D. Jason Neely, Ph.D. Cesar Monroy, Ph.D. David Schoenwald, Ph.D. * Dan Trudnowski, Ph.D. * Matt Donnelly, Ph.D. * Montana Tech University Acknowledgements 2  The work was performed under funding from the DOE Energy Storage Program managed by Dr. Imre Gyuk of the DOE Office of Electricity. Energy Storage Controls for Grid Stability  Power systems are susceptible to low frequency oscillations caused by generators separated by long transmission lines that oscillate against each other  These oscillations are not as well damped as higher frequency "local" oscillations  Energy storage-based damping controllers can mitigate these oscillations 3

419

2006 Peered Reviewed Archival Publications Adjeroh, D.A., Y. Zhang*  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and hybrid electric vehicles. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 56: 898-910. (MAE) Upadhyay properties of rubber-toughened post- industrial glass-fiber reinforced PA 66. Int. Polym. Processing. 21: 189 emissions from heavy-duty diesel vehicles: review and recent data. Journal of Air and Waste Management

Mohaghegh, Shahab

420

Final External Peer Review Report for Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: This reviewer was chosen primarily for his expertise in civil engineering (dredging, wetlands and coastal experience with flood management, wetland restoration, restoration design, marsh restoration, and coastal relative SLR in coastal Louisiana, and the EPA projections of accelerated SLR in the future, will have

US Army Corps of Engineers

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 December 2000 Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites The initial joint review was conducted between October 15 and December 15, 2000, by the Offices of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), Security and Emergency Operations (SO), and Environment, Safety and Health (EH). The purpose of the initial joint review was to assess the abilities of DOE sites to prevent and respond to wildland fires and provide recommendations for pertinent site-specific and DOE-wide improvements. Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0760

422

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Nevada Energy Storage Study - Jim Ellison, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NVEnergy Storage Study NVEnergy Storage Study Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND No. 2011-XXXXP Objectives To answer the following questions: * Is there a business case for energy storage in Nevada? * What value can energy storage provide to Nevada in the face of increasing renewables penetration? * What is the appropriate type, size, and location to maximize this value? * Does sub-hourly production cost modeling show improved value and performance for energy storage

423

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LADWP Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Project - Mukhlesur Bhuiyan, City of Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting San Diego, CA Los Angeles Department of Water and Power - Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Program Mukhles Bhuiyan Program Director June 8, 2012 December 2008 Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Program Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY10/11 - FY15/16 $60,280K Match Grant Technical Scope *Integrate Electric Vehicles into the LADWP grid *Demonstrate integrated Demand Response operation and technology. *Develop a comprehensive portfolio of Customer Behavior studies *Demonstrate next generation of Cyber Security *Using test bed sites to deploy and demonstrate an integrated communication, demand response, and electric vehicle infrastructure, protected by the next generation cyber security. *All this will be done in conjunction with consumer behavior studies identifying methods to

424

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Computational Tool (ESCT) - Colette Lamontagne, Navigant  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Computational Computational Tool (ESCT) v1.2 Overview Developed under DOE Contract DE-FE0004001 Task 430.05 September 26, 2012 Energy Storage Computational Tool (ESCT) 1 Characteristics of ESCT v1.2 Advantages Primary Purpose The ESCT is primarily designed to identify, quantify, and monetize the costs and benefits of an operational ES project. So, many of the inputs represent measured data. * Straightforward to use * Lends itself to quality control * Provides a consistent and credible method for identification and calculation of benefits * Ensures consistency of results across projects * Well suited for long term analysis Secondary Purpose The ESCT can also help the user evaluate the potential costs and benefits of a proposed or hypothetical project. It could also help to optimize the size, type, and location of

425

ESS 2012 Peer Review - International Energy Storage Database - Janice Lin, StrateGen  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Database Energy Storage Database Janice Lin Site Admin: storage.exchange@strategen.com; 510-665-7811 Special thanks to the DOE Energy Storage Program and Dr. Imre Gyuk US Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, Energy Storage Program Sandia National Laboratories Purpose: Establish the go-to source of open-access, reference-grade information on energy storage projects and policies. Status: The database beta is fully functional and is currently in the population stage, with over 70 entries vetted and published, and additional user-submitted entries being added regularly. The beta can be seen at http://sandia.gov/ess/database. Future Plans: We will continue to vet and maintain the entry data, as well as implement a variety of capabilities that will enhance functionality, and allow for a broader

426

Microsoft PowerPoint - 2010 CEDS Peer Review SEI CERT RMM [Read-Only]  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Adapting CERT-RMM to the Electricity Sector Adapting CERT-RMM to the Electricity Sector Summary: Adapting CERT-RMM to the Electricity Sector Outcomes: A subset of CERT-RMM tailored to the electricity sector Roadmap Challenge: Limited ability to measure and assess cyber security posture No consistent cyber security metrics No consistent cyber security metrics Poor understanding of cyber risks Weak business case for cyber security investments Major Successes: Presented RMM to leading utilities and received strong validation of need and applicability Schedule: pilot kickoff 9/10 Level of Effort: $225K Funds Remaining: $215K Performers: SEI Partners: piloting utilities Resilience defined The physical property of a material that can return to its original shape or position after deformation that does

427

2012 SG Peer Review - GridWise Architecture Council - Ron Melton, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Architecture and Standards and GridWise® Architecture and Standards and GridWise® Architecture Council (GWAC) Ron Melton, GWAC Administrator Pacific Northwest National Laboratory PNNL-SA-88349 June 7, 2012 December 2008 Architecture and Standards GridWise Architecture Council Objective Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) Prior to FY 12 FY12, authorized FY13, requested Out-year(s) $5,400K $560K $200K $500K/yr Technical Scope 2 Advance interoperability to enable full-scale smart grid deployments by engaging stakeholders in defining interoperability principles, methods, and tools. Provide DOE related point of coordination for NIST in response to EISA 2007 legislation. Organizational (Pragmatics) 8: Economic/Regulatory Policy 7: Business Objectives 6: Business Procedures Informational (Semantics) 5: Business Context

428

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Acid Based Blend Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries - Alan Cisar, Lynntech  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acid Based Blend Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries Acid Based Blend Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries DOE Grant No: DE-SC0006306 Alan Cisar* and Chris Rhodes Lynntech, Inc., 2501 Earl Rudder Freeway South, College Station, TX 77845 *E-mail: alan.cisar@lynntech.com, Phone: 979.764.2311 Prof. Arumugam Manthiram University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 Prof. Fuqiang Liu University of Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 Conclusions Lynntech, in conjunction with the University of Texas and the University of Texas at Arlington, developed a new series of low-cost polymer blend membranes with high proton conductivity and ultralow vanadium ion permeability. The proton conductivity and physical properties of these membranes are tunable by adjusting the ratio of acid and base components. Membrane conductivity was found to be more critical to

429

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Membranes for VRFB - Cy Fujimoto, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Photos placed in Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Advanced Membranes for VRFB. A Collaboration with SNL, PNNL and ORNL September 28, 2012 Cy Fujimoto Project 2 * VRFB Proven technology; 6MWh VRB on a 32 MW wind farm in Japan. * Near Commercialization; Prudent Energy and UniEnergy Technologies * Separation of energy and power * At the electrodes only electron transport is occurs. Allows for deep discharge, long life cycles and little capacity fade The problem is cost, DOE capital cost target $100/kWh 1 According to a recent study, 1 current capital costs is $380/kwh 1. M. Zhang, M. Moore, J.S. Watson, T.A. Zawodzinski, R.M. Counce; J. Electrochem. Soc., 159, A1184-A1188, 2012.

430

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Compressed Air Energy Storage - Robert Booth, PG&E-BAI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMPRESSED AIR ENERGY STORAGE IN CALIFORNIA COMPRESSED AIR ENERGY STORAGE IN CALIFORNIA Michael Medeiros, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Francisco, CA Robert Booth, Booth & Associates International, San Francisco, CA September 2012 Introduction The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) initiative in evaluating the technical and economic feasibility of compressed air energy storage (CAES) using porous rock reservoirs in California. PG&E was awarded funding from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the California Energy Commission (CEC), and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to determine the feasibility of a 300 MW CAES facility utilizing up to 10 hours of storage in a

431

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Low Cost, Manufacturable High Voltage Power Module for ESS - Brandon Passmore, APEI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

W. Research Center Blvd. * Fayetteville, AR 72701 * (479) 443-5759 W. Research Center Blvd. * Fayetteville, AR 72701 * (479) 443-5759 Design and Development of a Low Cost, Manufacturable High Voltage Power Module for Energy Storage Systems Phase I SBIR September 27, 2012 Brandon Passmore, PhD Sr. Electronics Packaging Research Engineer Email: bpassmo@apei.net Acknowledgements * I would like to thank Dr. Imre Gyuk of the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program and Dr. Stan Atcitty for technical support * I would also like to thank 2 Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

432

Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses Plan. Draft for Peer Review: Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) Project staff are developing mathematical models to be used to estimate the radiation dose that individuals may have received as a result of emissions since 1944 from the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. An uncertainty and sensitivity analyses plan is essential to understand and interpret the predictions from these mathematical models. This is especially true in the case of the HEDR models where the values of many parameters are unknown. This plan gives a thorough documentation of the uncertainty and hierarchical sensitivity analysis methods recommended for use on all HEDR mathematical models. The documentation includes both technical definitions and examples. In addition, an extensive demonstration of the uncertainty and sensitivity analysis process is provided using actual results from the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Integrated Codes (HEDRIC). This demonstration shows how the approaches used in the recommended plan can be adapted for all dose predictions in the HEDR Project.

Simpson, J.C.; Ramsdell, J.V. Jr.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

433

2012 SG Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Bill Becker, Spirae  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fort Collins RDSI Project Fort Collins RDSI Project Bill Becker, Oliver Pacific Spirae Inc. June 8, 2012 December 2008 Fort Collins RDSI Objective Life-cycle Funding FY09 - FY12 DOE: $6,323,380 Community: $4,729,569 Total: $11,052,949 Technical Scope I. Demonstrate the ability to reduce electric system distribution feeder peak load by 20% or more through the coordinated use of Distributed Energy Resources (DER). II. Advance the expertise, technologies and infrastructure necessary to achieve the vision of the Fort Collins Zero Energy District (FortZED) Integrate multiple and varied distributed energy resources (DER) from five partner sites with an active management platform that could coordinate the participation of these assets to achieve both project and community goals. 2 December 2008 Needs and Project Targets

434

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Essence of Structure Preserving Network Reductions - Dan Tylavsky  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tylavsky & Di Shi Tylavsky & Di Shi Arizona State University Hyungseon Oh University of Buffalo William Schulze, Ray Zimmerman, Dick Shuler, John Taber, Jubo Yan, Charles Marquet Cornell University Dan Shawhan Rensselaer Polytechnic University Overview * Motivation-Develop network Eq's for US for generator investment studies * Review (Modified) Ward-type network equivalent - Apply to EI, ERCOT & WECC - Model accuracy evaluation * Effect of dc model reduction * Effect of ac v. dc approximation * Base case, change cases & OPF * Bus Aggregation--A different approach for reduction * Clustering * Equivalent branch reactances * Accuracy * Conclusions Study Objective * Develop a backbone equivalent network model of the entire United States as a tool (to be made public domain) for the future

435

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Multi-period Multi-period Stochastic Optimization with Evolving Information Ray Zimmerman, Carlos Murillo-Sánchez, C. Lindsay Anderson, Bob Thomas, Amandeep Gupta, Daniel Muñoz-Álvarez CERTS Review, Cornell University August 7-8, 2012 Outline * Project Overview - progress on underlying tools - current focus * Design of Receding Horizon Framework * Uncertainty in Receding Horizon Input Data (i.e. "feeding the monster") 2 SuperOPF Map 3 MATPOWER SuperOPF Planning Tool 1 st gen SuperOPF AC and DC versions 3 rd gen SuperOPF 2 nd gen SuperOPF AC and DC versions extensible OPF architecture high performance solvers single-period explicit contingencies stochastic cost endogenous reserves 2-stage simulation structure environmental costs

436

Proceedings of the 1993 DOE/NREL Hydrogen Program Review  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy has conducted programs of research and development in hydrogen and related technologies since 1975. The current program is conducted in accordance with the DOE Hydrogen Program Plan FY 1993--FY 1997 which was published in June 1992. The plan establishes program priorities and guidance for the allocation of funding. The core program. currently under the Office of Energy Management, supports projects in the areas of hydrogen production, storage and systems research. A program review is held annually to evaluate each research project for technical quality, progress and programmatic benefit. The evaluation is conducted by a panel of technical experts. This proceedings of the Program Review conducted in May 1993 is a compilation of all research projects supported by the Hydrogen Program during FY 1993. It is produced in the anticipation that will serve as a useful technical reference for those interested in the status of hydrogen technologies. Selected papers have been indexed separately for inclusion in the Energy Science and Technology Database.

Not Available

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

DOE-HDBK-3012-2003; DOE Handbook Guide to Good Practices for Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-96 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) TEAM LEADER'S GUIDE U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 FOREWORD This Department of Energy handbook, Guide to Good Practices for Conducting Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Handbook, is approved for use by all DOE Components and their contractors. The guidance in this document is the distillation of the experience and lessons learned during numerous operational readiness reviews contributed by team leaders with a wide range of backgrounds. There are

438

Peer review presentation on systems performance modeling and solar advisor support.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Accurate Performance Models are Critical to Project Development and Technology Evaluation - Accuracy and Uncertainty of Commonly-Used Models Unknown and Models Disagree. A Model Evaluation Process Has Been Developed with Industry, and High-Quality Weather and System Performance Data Sets Have Been Collected: (1) Evaluation is Underway using Residual Analysis of Hourly and Sub-Hourly Data for Clear and Diffuse Climates to Evaluate and Improve Models; and (2) Initial Results Have Been or Will Soon Be Presented at Key Conferences. Evaluation of Widely-Used Module, Inverter, and Irradiance Models, Including Those in SAM, PVWatts, and PVSyst, Will Be Completed This Year. Stochastic Modeling Has Been Performed to Support Reliability Task and Will Add Value to Parametric Analysis. An Industry Workshop will be Held This Fall To Review Results, Set Priorities. Support and Analysis has been Provided for TPP's, SETP, and PV Community. Goals for Future Work Include: (1) Improving Understanding of and Validating System Derate Factors; and (2) Developing a Dynamic Electrical Model of Arrays with Shaded or Mismatched Modules to Support Transient Analysis of Large Fields.

Cameron, Christopher P.

2010-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Total energy cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: an energy and environmental analysis. Volume 4: peer review comments on technical report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report compares the energy use, oil use and emissions of electric vehicles (EVs) with those of conventional, gasoline-powered vehicles (CVs) over the total life cycle of the vehicles. The various stages included in the vehicles` life cycles include vehicle manufacture, fuel production, and vehicle operation. Disposal is not included. An inventory of the air emissions associated with each stage of the life cycle is estimated. Water pollutants and solid wastes are reported for individual processes, but no comprehensive inventory is developed. Volume IV includes copies of all the external peer review comments on the report distributed for review in July 1997.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

Second Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site Completed; Report Now Available Online Second Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site Completed; Report Now Available Online February 3, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Danielle Miller (DOE-ID) 208-526-5709 An Idaho Cleanup Project team has completed work on the site-wide five-year review of cleanup at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Idaho site. "This report verifies that the performance of cleanup actions at the Idaho Site continues to be protective of human health and the environment," said Nicole Hernandez, DOE's project manager for the five-year review. "The findings in the report demonstrate a strong collaborative effort by CH2M-WG Idaho (CWI), DOE, the Environmental

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Hydrogen-Bromine Flow Batteries for Grid-Scale Energy Storage - Vincent Battaglia, LBNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

H H 2 /Br 2 Flow Battery for Grid-Scale Energy Storage Venkat Srinivasan, Adam Weber, & Vince Battaglia Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory * DOE ESS Review * Washington, DC * September 26, 2012 vsbattaglia@lbl.gov Purpose Develop a low-cost, energy-storage system with high power density at 80% efficiency Use H 2 and Br 2 in a flow battery Future Plans Modeling Funding from ARPA-E GRIDS, USDOE LBNL: Kyu Taek Cho (Cell studies); Paul Ridgway (Catalysis studies); Sophia Haussener (Transport modeling) Bosch: Paul Albertus (Cost Modeling); Roel Sanchez-Carrera and Boris Kozinsky (Catalyst theory)

442

EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to request for...

443

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

if their product or equipment cannot be tested under the DOE test procedure, or if testing under the DOE test procedure would evaluate the product or equipment in a manner...

444

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2010 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2010 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell...

445

CEDS 2010 Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Philip A Craig Jr Philip A Craig Jr Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Real-Time Security State Visualization Real-Time Security State Visualization  Outcomes: Near real-time situational awareness utilizing a diverse set of data feeds with a flexible visualization implementation.  Roadmap Challenge: Fusing perimeter security, network traffic analysis, signature-based intrusion detection systems, routable and serial traffic analysis.  Major Successes: Produced an integrated view of real-time network and physical security events at a power substation  Schedule: Deliver 1 st POC, 2 nd POC Fall 2010  Level of Effort: $325K  Funds Remaining: $75K  Performers: PNNL  Partners: ANL, STI, OSIsoft High Level Illustration of Functions/Components Real-Time Security State Visualization

446

Peer Reviewed Archival Publications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

size during the blending of relatively-inelastic polymer melts. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 23: 135. Characteristics and carbonization behaviors of coal extracts. Fuel Processing Technology 79: 207-215. Stiller, A

Mohaghegh, Shahab

447

CEDS 2010 Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Produced an integrated view of real-time network and physical security events at a power substation Schedule: Deliver 1 st POC, 2 nd POC Fall 2010 Level of Effort:...

448

FEMP Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FEMP's mission and goals * Relevance to technical and market challenges * Management In addition, the panel assessed FEMP's congruence with the mission and goals of the...

449

For Peer Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Here ?E denotes the total time derivative of the total mechanical energy, ..... The distance function dC, which measures the distance to a closed set C, is given by:.

450

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

motor controller inverter system. (In work) * 2008 Task 2 * Continue integration of direct cooled HTS system with the rotor assembly (95% of hardware is complete, last upgrades...

451

Peer Reviewed Archival Publications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. (Roger) Chen Chen, H.L. and Y. He* . 2001. Analysis of an acoustic surface waveguide for AE monitoring, and A.L. Miller. 2001. SO2 removal by leaching coal pyrite. Energy and Fuels 15: 470-476. Dady B. Dadyburjor Zhu+ , J.S., L.P. Norcio, E.L. Kugler, D.B. Dadyburjor, J.L. Yang+ , Z.Y. Liu+ , and B. Zhong

Mohaghegh, Shahab

452

Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

strengthen the Department's capabilities in preventing and responding to wildland fires. DOE orders and policy guidance do not clearly establish or convey expectations for...

453

NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of Energy NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of Energy Unpublished order of the D.C. Circuit dismissing the National Association of Regulatory Utiliy Commissioners' petition for review; Petioners requested that the Court issue three orders: (1) that the Secretary conduct an annual assessment under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, (2) that the Nuclear Waste Fund fee be suspended pending completion of his annual assessment; and (3) that the Secretary suspend the NWF fee in light of the current status of DOE's waste disposal program; Court dismissed the first two claims as moot and the third claim as unripe. NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States

454

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings The US Department of Energy Hydrogen Program held its 2005 Annual Merit Review May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. Principal investigators presented their project status and results in these presentations and posters. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations A. Distributed Production Technologies B. DOE Fossil Energy C. Separations D. Biomass Reforming E. Biological Production F. Photoelectrochemical Production G. Electrolysis H. DOE Nuclear Energy I. Hi-Temp Thermochemical J. Hydrogen Delivery Posters A. Distributed Production Technologies B. DOE Fossil Energy C. Separations D. Biomass Reforming E. Biological Production F. Photoelectrochemical Production

455

DOE-STD-1082-94; DOE Standard Preparation, Review, and Approval of Implementaiton Plans For Nuclear Safety Requirements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

82-94 82-94 October 1994 DOE STANDARD PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615)576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE95001461 DOE-STD-1082-94 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard has been prepared by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health with the assistance of Steve

456

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Logo for the 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Review, May 16-19, Washinton, D.C. The DOE Hydrogen Program held its Annual Merit Review May 16-19, 2006 in Arlington, Virginia. Principal investigators presented their project status and results in these oral and poster presentations. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations Distributed Production Photoelectrochemical Production Electrolysis Nuclear Energy Initiative Hi-Temp Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen from Coal Posters Distributed Production Separations Biomass Reforming Biological Production Photoelectrochemical Electrolysis Nuclear Energy Initiative Hi-Temp Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery

457

2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Review: Hydrogen Codes and Standards  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A PowerPoint presentation given as part of the 2005 Hydrogen Program Review, May 24, 2005, in Washington, D.C.

Ohi, J.

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2004 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Proceedings The U.S. Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program held its 2004 Annual Merit Review May 24-27, 2004 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Principal investigators presented the...

459

Does the Use of Co-teaching Models in Algebra Result in an Increase in Student Achievement Among Students with Disabilities and Their Non-disabled Peers?.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

?? This study investigated high school students with special needs and their non-disabled peers in a Maryland public school system who were taught by co-teachers (more)

Whisted, Melissa Lembo

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

460

Review of DOE Waste Package Program. Semiannual report, October 1984-March 1985. Volume 8  

SciTech Connect

A large number of technical reports on waste package component performance were reviewed over the last year in support of the NRC`s review of the Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Environmental Assessment reports. The intent was to assess in some detail the quantity and quality of the DOE data and their relevance to the high-level waste repository site selection process. A representative selection of the reviews is presented for the salt, basalt, and tuff repository projects. Areas for future research have been outlined. 141 refs.

Davis, M.S. (ed.)

1985-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

DOE Petitions for NRC Review in Yucca Mountain Proceeding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The United States Department of Energy today filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission a petition requesting that the Commission review and reverse an order by the NRCs Atomic Safety and...

462

McCray DOE Review 8.22.12.ppt  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23,...

463

Review of Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) Assessments for the DOE Hanford Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this review is to assess the need for updating Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) assessments for the DOE's Hanford Site, as required by DOE Order 420.1B Chapter IV, Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation, based on significant changes in state-of-the-art NPH assessment methodology or site-specific information. This review is an update and expansion to the September 2010 review of PNNL-19751, Review of Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) Assessments for the Hanford 200 Areas (Non-Seismic).

Snow, Robert L.; Ross, Steven B.

2011-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

464

Joint DOE/NSF Review of U.S. LHC Software and Computing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Joint DOENSF Status Meeting of U.S. LHC Software and Computing July 8, 2004 at DOE, Germantown, MD Agenda | Documentation | Attendees | Report Purpose: Status review of the U.S....

465

DOE Energy in Indian Country Conference and Annual Tribal Energy Program Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The 2012 DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Tribal Energy Program Review in Denver, Colorado, will provide an overview of the wide range of renewable energy and energy efficiency...

466

WP_Peer_Rev_Spec_Top_Rpts.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Package Materials Performance Peer Review Package Materials Performance Peer Review A Compilation of Special Topic Reports Compiled and Edited by Frank M.G. Wong and Joe H. Payer May 31, 2002 Special Topic Reports prepared for the Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review. The Final Report of the Peer Review was submitted to U.S. Department of Energy and Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC on February 28, 2002. ii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Special Topic Reports prepared for the Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review. The Final Report of the Peer Review was submitted to U.S. Department of Energy and Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC on February 28, 2002. iii Table of Contents Introduction Design And Fabrication Factors 1. Fabrication Processes and Metallurgy: Peer Review Sub-Panel Meeting F. Wong

467

Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the DOE Complex  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Follow-up Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the Department of Energy Complex OVERSIGHT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 3 2.0 STATUS OF DOE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS ...................................................... 5 Overall Assessment .......................................................................... 5 Improvements to Emergency Management Programs at DOE Sites Since 1998 .................................................................. 5 Continuing Weaknesses ................................................................... 7 Underlying Causes ...........................................................................

468

Proceedings of the 1995 U.S. DOE hydrogen program review, Volume 1  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document containes reports from the proceedings of the 1995 U.S. DOE hydrogen program review. Reports are organized under the topics of systems analysis, utilization, storage, and production. This volume, Volume I, contains the reports concerned with systems analysis and utilization. Individual reports were processed separately for the DOE data bases.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

1990 DOE/SANDIA crystalline photovoltaic technology project review meeting  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document serves as the proceedings for the annual project review meeting held by Sandia's Photovoltaic Cell Research Division and Photovoltaic Technology Division. It contains information supplied by each organization making a presentation at the meeting, which was held August 7 through 9, 1990 at the Sheraton Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Sessions were held to discuss national photovoltaic programs, one-sun crystalline silicon cell research, concentrator silicon cell research, concentrator 3-5 cell research, and concentrating collector development.

Ruby, D.S. (ed.)

1990-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

An external peer review of the U.S. Department of Energy`s assessment of ``damages and benefits of the fuel cycles: Estimation methods, impacts, and values``. Final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The need for better assessments of the ``external`` benefits and costs of environmental effects of various fuel cycles was identified during the development of the National Energy Strategy. The growing importance of this issue was emphasized by US Department of Energy (DOE) management because over half of the states were already pursuing some form of social costing in electricity regulation and a well-established technical basis for such decisions was lacking. This issue was identified as a major area of controversy--both scientifically and politically--in developing energy policies at the state and national level. In 1989, the DOE`s Office of Domestic and International Energy Policy commissioned a study of the external environmental damages and benefits of the major fuel cycles involved in electric power generation. Over the next 3-year period, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Resources for the Future conducted the study and produced a series of documents (fuel cycle documents) evaluating the costs of environmental damages of the coal, oil, natural gas, biomass, hydroelectric, and nuclear fuel cycles, as well as the Background Document on methodological issues. These documents described work that took almost 3 years and $2.5 million to complete and whose implications could be far reaching. In 1992, the Secretary of Energy sought advice on the overall concepts underlying the studies and the means employed to estimate environmental externalities. He asked the Secretary of Energy`s Advisory Board to undertake a peer review of the fuel cycle studies and encouraged the Board to turn to outside expertise, as needed.

Not Available

1993-08-09T23:59:59.000Z

471

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: KCP&L Green Impact Zone Smart Grid Demonstration - Edward Hedges, Kansas City Power & Light  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting KCP&L Green Impact Zone SmartGrid Demonstration Project Edward T. Hedges, P.E. Manager SmartGrid Technology Planning Kansas City Power & Light Company June 8, 2012 December 2008 KCP&L Green Impact Zone SmartGrid Demonstration Project Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) 2010 - 2014 $23,940,112 Technical Scope First, Create a complete, end-to-end Smart Grid Second, Introduce new technologies, applications, protocols, communications and business models Third, Incorporates a best-in-class approach to technology integration through use of Smart Grid interoperability standards Finally, Support a targeted urban revitalization effort in Kansas City's Green Impact Zone 2 - SmartSubstation - SmartDistribution - SmartGeneration - SmartDR/DER

472

Radioactive waste isolation in salt: Peer review of the Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation's draft report on an issues hierarchy and data needs for site characterization  

SciTech Connect

At the request of the Salt Repository Project (SRPO), Argonne National Laboratory conducted an independent peer review of a report by the Battelle Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation entitled ''Salt Repository Project Issues Hierarchy and Data Needs for Site Characterization (Draft).'' This report provided a logical structure for evaluating the outstanding questions (issues) related to selection and licensing of a site as a high-level waste repository. It also provided a first estimate of the information and data necessary to answer or resolve those questions. As such, this report is the first step in developing a strategy for site characterization. Microfiche copies of ''Draft Issues Hierarchy, Resolution Strategy, and Information Needs for Site Characterization and Environmental/Socioeconomic Evaluation - July, 1986'' and ''Issues Hierarchy and Data Needs for Site Characterization - February, 1985'' are included in the back pocket of this report.

Harrison, W.; Fenster, D.F.; Ditmars, J.D.; Paddock, R.A.; Rote, D.M.; Hambley, D.F.; Seitz, M.G.; Hull, A.B.

1986-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

Order Module--DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS AND SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS Order Module--DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS AND SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS The familiar level of this module is divided into two sections that are intended to provide only an overview of the material contained in DOE-STD-1104-2009, which should be consulted for complete information. The first section covers the introduction, applicability, and chapters 1 and 2. The second section covers chapters 3, 4, and 5. We have provided examples throughout the module to help familiarize you with the material. The examples will also help prepare you for the practice at the end of this module and for the criterion test.

474

Building Technologies Office: 2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review 2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review The 2013 Department of Energy (DOE) Building Technologies Office Program Review was held April 2-4, 2013 in Washington, DC. This inaugural review encompassed active work done by the Building Technologies Office (BTO), with a total of 59 individual activities reviewed. Sixty independent experts assessed the progress and contributions of each project toward BTO's mission and goals, and these assessments will be used to enhance the management of existing efforts, gauge the effectiveness of projects, and design future programs. The meeting also provided an opportunity to promote collaborations, partnerships, and technology transfers. 2013 Program Peer Review Report | 2013 Program Peer Review Presentations

475

DOE-STD-1134-99 Review Guide for Criticality Safety Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-99 4-99 September 1999 DOE STANDARD REVIEW GUIDE FOR CRITICALITY SAFETY EVALUATIONS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1134-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy Standard is approved for use by all DOE criticality safety personnel. It contains guidelines that should be followed when reviewing Criticality Safety Evaluations that

476

Review of four DOE-sponsored low temperature steam systems  

SciTech Connect

The system characteristics and limited operating experience of four DOE-sponsored low temperature steam system field tests are described. The West Point Peperell (Honeywell) installation in Farifax, Alabama, has been operational for nine months but has experienced numerous minor equipment and system problems and a major problem with its shadow bar tracker. The other three installations are not operational yet. Johnson and Johnson (Acurex) in Sherman, Texas, is currently in the startup and checkout phase and will be operational in December, 1979. Home Laundry (Jacobs-Del) in Pasadena, California, and Tropicana Products (General Electric) in Bradenton, Florida, are both well into the construction phase and expect to be operational in February, 1980.

Gerich, J.W.

1979-11-20T23:59:59.000Z

477

Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 5-29-12.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29, 2012 29, 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel, Room 6A245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted via e-mail to: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Dear DOE staff: The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is again asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. Though DOE has just granted an extension of the comment deadline in today's Federal Register from today to June 19, 2012, we are filing these comments now so DOE can have the benefit of our views.

478

DOE-HDBK-3012-96; Team Leader's Preparation Guide for Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INCH-POUND INCH-POUND DOE-HDBK-3012-96 June 1996 SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-94 September 1994 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) TEAM LEADER'S GUIDE U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009471 DOE-HDBK-3012-96 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy handbook, Guide to Good Practices for Conducting Operational

479

Specific Administrative Controls Review at the Hanford Site with EM at DOE-RL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report on its Participation in a Review of Selected Aspects of Nuclear Safety at the Hanford Site Plutonium Finishing Plant, November 29 - December 3, 2010 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in the Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC) at the Hanford Site. The EM-23 review included selected programs at the Hanford Site that are under the auspices of the DOE Richland Operations Office. During the review, Independent Oversight personnel reviewed a few of the SACs applicable to the Plutonium Finishing Plant.

480

ACE Merit Review Report FY2004  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Merit Review and Peer Evaluation of FY 2004 DOE Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL May 18-20, 2004 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Program December 2004 Bringing you a prosperous future where energy is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 13, 2004 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2004 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 18-20, 2004 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Merit Review System | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Grants Policy and Guidance » Merit Review System Grants Policy and Guidance » Merit Review System Grants & Contracts Support Grants & Contracts Support Home About Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) DOE National Laboratory Announcements Grants Process Grants Policy and Guidance Grant/Cooperative Agreement Forms FAQs Resources Contract Information Contact Information Grants & Contracts Support U.S. Department of Energy SC-43/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 301-903-2859 E: sc.grantsandcontracts@science.doe.gov Grants Policy and Guidance Merit Review System Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Action: Notice (Published in the Federal Register) Background Summary: The Office of Science (SC) (Formerly Office of Energy Research) published this revision to its Merit Review System in the Federal

482

Relationship between the DOE loan guaranty and California Environmental Quality Act environmental review processes  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is involved in numerous geothermal research, development, demonstration, and loan guaranty projects in the State of California. These projects often require the preparation of both an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), as required by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Impact Statement (EIS) as required under NEPA. DOE adoption or utilization of information contained in EIR's to meet that agency's NEPA requirements and thereby reduce duplication of effort is dependent on four critical issues: (1) the scope of the proposed action analyzed, (2) the completeness of treatment of environmental issues, (3) the level of DOE involvement in EIR preparation, and (4) the timing of DOE involvement in EIR preparation. At this time, several constraints prevent the integration of the DOE Loan Guaranty and CEQA environmental review and documentation processes. First, the time required to complete an EIR (up to 2 years in some cases) is not compatible with DOE's goal of processing loan guaranty applications within a 4 month period. Second, the CEQA process is usually initiated and completed prior to DOE's involvement in the project. Therefore, DOE often has no role in document preparation and must verify the content of an EIR before adopting or using that document and often must prepare a separate DOE EA even though an EIR exists.

Mezga, L.J.; Brechbill, R.A.

1980-09-09T23:59:59.000Z