Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

2

DOE Greenbook - Needs and Directions in High-Performance Computing for the Office of Science  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The NERSC Users Group (NUG) encompasses all investigators utilizing the NERSC computational and storage resources of the Department of Energy Office of Science facility. At the February 2001 meeting held at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing (NERSC) facility, the NUG executive committee (NUGEX) began the process to assess the role of computational science and determine the computational needs in future Office of Science (OS) programs. The continuing rapid development of the computational science fields and computer technology (both hardware and software) suggest frequent periodic review of user requirements and the role that computational science should play in meeting OS program commitments. Over the last decade, NERSC (and many other supercomputer centers) have transitioned from a center based on vector supercomputers to one almost entirely dedicated to massively parallel platforms (MPPs). Users have had to learn and transform their application codes to make use of these parallel computers. NERSC computer time requests suggest that a vast majority of NERSC users have accomplished this transition and are ready for production parallel computing. Tools for debugging, mathematical toolsets, and robust communication software have enabled this transition. The large memory and CPU power of these parallel machines are allowing simulations at resolutions, timescales, and levels of realism in physics that were never before possible. Difficulties and performance issues in using MPP systems remain linked to the access of non-uniform memory: cache, local, and remote memory. This issue includes both the speed of access and the methods of access to the memory architecture. Optimized mathematical tools to perform standard functions on parallel machines are available. Users should be encouraged to make heavy use of those tools to enhance productivity and system performance. There are at least four underlying components to the computational resources used by OS researchers. (1) High-Performance Computing Technology; (2) Advanced Software Technology and Algorithms; (3) Energy Sciences Network; and (4) Basic Research and Human Resources. In addition to the availability from the vendor community, these components determine the implementation and direction of the development of the supercomputing resources for the OS community. In this document we will identify scientific and computational needs from across the five Office of Science organizations: High Energy and Nuclear Physics, Basic Energy Sciences, Fusion Energy Science, Biological and Environmental Research, and Advanced Scientific Computing Research. We will also delineate the current suite of NERSC computational and human resources. Finally, we will provide a set of recommendations that will guide the utilization of current and future computational resources at the DOE NERSC.

Rotman, D; Harding, P

2002-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

3

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Directives DOE Directives DOE Directives Directives are the Department of Energy's primary means to communicate and institutionalize directives and policies and to establish requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental elements and contractors. DOE O 413.3A - Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets DOE G 413.3-1 - Managing Design and Construction Using Systems Engineering for Use with DOE O 413.3A DOE G 413.3-2 - Quality Assurance Guide for Project Management DOE G 413.3-3 - Safeguards and Security for Program and Project Management DOE G 413.3-8 - Environmental Management (EM) Cleanup Projects DOE G 413.3-9 - U.S. Department of Energy Project Review Guide for Capital Asset Projects DOE G 413.3-10 - Earned Value Management System (EVMS)

4

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship &  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie Hill Roberson (EM-11) To: Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair, INEEL Citizens Advisory Board This letter is in response to a November 21, 2003 letter regarding direction and guidance for implementing direct DOE relationship and funding for Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 12, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Board Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship

5

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship &  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie Hill Roberson (EM-11) To: Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair, INEEL Citizens Advisory Board This letter is in response to a November 21, 2003 letter regarding direction and guidance for implementing direct DOE relationship and funding for Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 12, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Board Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship

6

Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSAB Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSAB From: Designated Federal Officer, Sandra L. Waisley (EM-11) To: SSAB Members (G. Stegner, J. Reising, G. Bowman, T. Taylor, C. Gertz, B. Murphie, S. McCracken, M. Marvin, J. Rampe, A. Doswell, C. Anderson, B. Wethington, S. Brennan, K. Kozeliski, D. Dollins, P. Halsey, Y. Sherman, L. Bratcher, R. Warther, K. Klein, R. Schepens, F. Lockhart, J. Allison, R. Erickson, E. Sellers, K. Carlson, G. Boyd, R. Butler) The memorandum informs of Assistant Secrectary Roberson's direction and guidance for implementing a DOE direct relationship and funding approach for EM's Site-Specific Advisory Board (EMSSAB).

7

DOE Performance Report 2006.qxd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/IG-APP-008 DOE/IG-APP-008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL DOE/IG-APP-008 Annual Performance Report FY 2005 Annual Performance Plan FY 2006 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2005 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN FY 2006 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Message from the Inspector General I am pleased to present the Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year 2005 Annual Performance Report and Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Performance Plan. Our office continues to work vigorously in support of the Department and its mission. During FY 2005, we issued 99 audit and inspection reports containing recommendations for over $619 million in savings; referred 31 criminal cases for prosecution; obtained 14 convictions; recovered over $27.4 million in fines, restitutions and settlements; and,

8

DOE Standards and Corresponding Directives Crosswalk  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Standards and Corresponding Directives Crosswalk DOE Standard Title Date DOE Order(s) Referenced Does DOE Order Reference Standard(s) DOE-TSL-1-99 Department of Energy Standards Index 5/99 ½ None ½ N/A. DOE-TSL-2-98 Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program 1/88 ½ None ½ N/A. DOE-TSL-4-99 Directory of DOE and Contractor Personnel Involved in Non- Government Standards Activities 5/99 ½ None ½ N/A. DOE-STD-0100T-93 Licensed Reactor Nuclear Safety Criteria Applicable to DOE Reactors 11/93 ½ DOE O 5480.6 ½ Order has been cancelled by N 251.4. DOE-STD-101-92 Compilation of Nuclear Safety Criteria for Potential Application to DOE Nonreactor Nuclear Facilities 3/92 ½ DOE O 5480.5 ½ Order has been cancelled by N 1321.140. DOE-HDBK-1001-96

9

Organizational Sustainability - A New Direction for DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Organizational Sustainability: A New Direction for DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security * Issues Facing the Nation * How DOE Fits in the Resolution of these Issues * Problems Impacting DOE's Ability to Resolve Issues * Definition of Sustainability * Intent of Sustainability Pilot Study * Economic Vitality as the Nation's Foundation Discussion Topics Introduction The vitality of the nation's economy forms the foundation of our high quality of life, our national security, and the hope that future generations will inherit ever-greater opportunities. That vitality is derived largely from the productivity of well-trained people and the steady stream of scientific and technical innovations they produce. Without high-quality, knowledge-intensive careers and

10

DOE/IG Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 More Documents & Publications Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY...

11

Technical Standards,DOE Standards and Corresponding Directives...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Corresponding Directives Crosswalk More Documents & Publications Technical Standards, DOE Orders and Applicable CFRsDEAR Crosswalk - February 2, 2002 All Active DOE Technical...

12

New MEA Materials for Improved Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC) Performance, Durability, and Cost - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report James Fletcher (Primary Contact), Philip Cox University of North Florida (UNF) 1 UNF Drive Jacksonville, FL 32224 Phone: (904) 620-1844 Email: jfletche@UNF.edu DOE Managers HQ: Donna Ho Phone: (202) 586-8000 Email: Donna.Ho@ee.doe.gov GO: Katie Randolph Phone: (720) 356-1759 Email: Katie.Randolph@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0000475 Subcontractors: * University of Florida, Gainesville, FL * Northeastern University, Boston, MA * Johnson Matthey Fuel Cells, Swindon, UK

13

DOE SES PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This plan covers Department of Energy SES executives, as well as those Presidential appointees who have retained eligibility for SES performance appraisals and awards under 5 U.S.C. 3392(c).

14

Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY...

15

DOE High Performance Concentrator PV Project  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Much in demand are next-generation photovoltaic (PV) technologies that can be used economically to make a large-scale impact on world electricity production. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) initiated the High-Performance Photovoltaic (HiPerf PV) Project to substantially increase the viability of PV for cost-competitive applications so that PV can contribute significantly to both our energy supply and environment. To accomplish such results, the National Center for Photovoltaics (NCPV) directs in-house and subcontracted research in high-performance polycrystalline thin-film and multijunction concentrator devices with the goal of enabling progress of high-efficiency technologies toward commercial-prototype products. We will describe the details of the subcontractor and in-house progress in exploring and accelerating pathways of III-V multijunction concentrator solar cells and systems toward their long-term goals. By 2020, we anticipate that this project will have demonstrated 33% system efficiency and a system price of $1.00/Wp for concentrator PV systems using III-V multijunction solar cells with efficiencies over 41%.

McConnell, R.; Symko-Davies, M.

2005-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

DOE Directives, Regulations, and Standards Portal - Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Globe Image Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program Home Search Approved Standards Recently Approved RevCom Logo RevCom for TSP Drafts for Review Registered Projects...

17

DOE O 251.1C, Departmental Directives Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

To define requirements and responsibilities for implementing the Department of Energy (DOE) Directives Program in support of the Secretary's memorandum of ...

2009-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

18

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Directions  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio > Fernald > Visitors Center > Directions Ohio > Fernald > Visitors Center > Directions Fernald Preserve Directions Fernald Preserve Directions Fernald Preserve Home Page Visitors Center Directions Event Calendar Community Meeting Room Guided Tour Educational Field Trip Speaker Request Brochures Fact Sheets Presentations BioBlitz Geocaching Pets Policy Fernald Preserve Coordinates NAD83 State Plane Ohio South Easting 1350546 Northing 476599 Latitude 39.288048 N Longitude 84.683540 W Latitude 39 17' 16.974" N Longitude 84 41' 0.746" W Fernald Preserve Addresses Site: 7400 Willey Road Harrison, OH 45013 Mailing: U.S. Department of Energy 10995 Hamilton-Cleves Hwy. Harrison, OH 45030 U.S. Department of Energy Contractor S.M. Stoller Corporation 10995 Hamilton-Cleves Hwy. Harrison, OH 45030

19

Explaining Corporate Environmental Performance: How Does Regulation Matter?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Environmental Performance: How Does Regulation Matter?How and to what extent does regulation matter in shapingof social control, and how does it interact with those

Kagan, Robert A.; Gunningham, Neil; Thornton, Dorothy

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

20

DOE Orders, Directives, Guides and Memos DOE O 142.3A, Unclassified...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Orders, Directives, Guides and Memos DOE O 142.3A, Unclassified Foreign Visits and Assignments Program The Order defines a program for unclassified foreign national access to...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

January 30, 2008, New Directions in Learning: Building a DOE University System  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directions Directions in Learning at DOE: Building a DOE University System FTCP Teleconference January 30, 2008 Dr. Jeff T.H. Pon Chief Human Capital Officer U.S. DOE 1 Mission Critical Function Needed Competencies Assess and/or Certify Possession of Competencies Training & Development Programs Aligned with Competencies IDP To Improve Performance and Close Competency Gaps Mission & Strategic Goals DOE is Implementing a Competency- Centric Learning Framework The DOE Competency Framework Enables Strategic Alignment of Learning & Development Systems to Strategic Goals 2 U = Universal Competencies: universal competencies needed by every individual to be effective in today's work environment. Examples may include: *Resolving Conflict *Emotional Intelligence *Team Skills

22

DOE RFP Seeks Projects for Improving Environmental Performance...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE RFP Seeks Projects for Improving Environmental Performance of Unconventional Natural Gas Technologies DOE RFP Seeks Projects for Improving Environmental Performance of...

23

DOE Field Procurement Offices Where EM Work is Performed | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Management Acquisition DOE Field Procurement Offices Where EM Work is Performed DOE Field Procurement Offices Where EM Work is Performed The following is a list of...

24

Memorandum of American High-Performance Buildings Coalition DOE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorandum of American High-Performance Buildings Coalition DOE Meeting August 19, 2013 Memorandum of American High-Performance Buildings Coalition DOE Meeting August 19, 2013 This...

25

APPLICATION OF DOE-2 TO RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

2 and DO:C-2". ASHRAE- DOE Conference on Thermal PerformanceLeighton, G. ; Ross, H. (1979). "DOE~2: A New State-of-the-Performance Standards". ASHRAE-DOE Conference on Thermal

Lokmanhekim, M.

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

DOE directives: Improving contractor review and compliance systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Department of Energy contractors are regulated by DOE directives. Rigorous and effective contractor administrative systems to review directives and document compliance are essential. WINCO recognized the need to improve its directives review system. Three areas have been addressed: Computerized tracking, documentation of the review itself--at the requirement rather then the directive level, and the role of the directives administrator. The result is a system that generates and captures information for use in the company rather than simply creating files and that attest to work accomplished.

Airmet, D.

1990-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

27

Application of High Performance Computing to the DOE Joint Genomic...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Application of High Performance Computing to the DOE Joint Genomic Institute's Data Challenges January 25-26, 2010 DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA USA -by invitation...

28

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Directions Directions Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) ASCR Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (85KB) ASCR Budget ASCR Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of ASCR Funding Opportunities Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) News & Resources Contact Information Advanced Scientific Computing Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-21/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-7486 F: (301) 903-4846 E: sc.ascr@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Directions to the Office of Advanced Scientific Computing and Research at DOE at Germantown, MD From Washington Dulles International Airport: External link

29

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directions Directions High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (170KB) HEP Budget HEP Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs University Research & National Labs Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page a DOE Headquarters ( Red Star ; floor plan .gif file (100KB); picture .jpg file (87KB); aerial photo .jpg file (924KB)) are located 30 miles NW of Washington, DC in Germantown, MD. Horizontal Divider

30

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directions Directions Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (51KB) BES Budget BES Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Organizational History Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) News & Resources Contact Information Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-22/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3081 F: (301) 903-6594 E: sc.bes@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page DOE Headquarters ( ) is located 30 miles NW of Washington, DC in Germantown, MD Floor plan .gif file (100KB) ; Picture .jpg file (87KB) ; Aerial photo .jpg file (924KB)

31

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directions Directions Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (32KB) NP Budget NP Committees of Visitors Directions Local Map Jobs Labs & Universities Nuclear Physics Related Brochures Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Related Links View local map The DOE office in Germantown, MD are located northwest of Washington, DC. The region is served by 3 airports: BWI - Baltimore-Washington External link

32

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Directions Directions Fusion Energy Sciences (FES) FES Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (104KB) FES Budget FES Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Fusion and Plasmas Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of FES Funding Opportunities Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) News & Resources Contact Information Fusion Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-24/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4941 F: (301) 903-8584 E: sc.fes@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page DOE Headquarters in Germantown, MD is located 30 miles northwest of downtown D.C. on the corner of Rt. 118 South and I-270 U.S. Department of Energy 19901 Germantown Road

33

Review of DOE HQ Emergency Response Plans and Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance March 2003 Prepared by Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of...

34

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Directions Directions Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BER Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (172KB) BER Budget BER Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BER Funding Opportunities Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) News & Resources Contact Information Biological and Environmental Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-23/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3251 F: (301) 903-5051 E: sc.ber@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Directions to Department of Energy, Germantown, Maryland and the Office of Biological and Environmental Research Mailing Address: SC-23/Germantown Building

35

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Directions Directions New Brunswick Laboratory (NBL) NBL Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (189KB) Points of Contact (POCs) History Directions Jobs Programs Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) Training Categorical Exclusion Determinations News Contact Information New Brunswick Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Building 350 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439-4899 P: (630) 252-2442 (NBL) P: (630) 252-2767 (CRM sales) F: (630) 252-6256 E: usdoe.nbl@ch.doe.gov About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The New Brunswick Laboratory is located on the Argonne National Laboratory Site. New Brunswick Laboratory 9800 S. Cass Ave. Building 350 Argonne, IL 60439-4899 To reach Argonne from O'Hare International Airport, take I-294 south to I-55. Exit west on I-55 (toward St. Louis ) and continue for about four

36

2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home 2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to the White House Council on Environmental...

37

Department of Energy (DOE) Energy Savings Performance Contract...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1.2 IDIQ FAQs ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACT (ESPC) INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) 1. DOE's New IDIQ Contract Why did the...

38

DOE Buildings Performance Database, sample Residential data ...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

18px" classApple-style-span>The Buildings PerformanceDatabase will havean API that allows access to the statistics about the data without exposing private...

39

Municipal performance: does mayoral quality matter?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This research addresses the question of what explains municipal performance in terms of delivering social services and fiscal performance. While the existing literature explains governmental performance with political, institutional and socio-demographic factors, I suggest that the greatest influence on municipal performance comes from having qualified managers. Specifically, I argue that that mayoral qualifications influence municipal performance. By qualifications I mean mayors human capital, that is, their educational and job-related experience. The rationale for my proposition rests on the fact that in developing municipalities the mayor is not just the elected leader but also the public manager, as s/he performs not just political but also administrative functions. Under certain circumstances, however, mayoral qualifications may not have the same influential power on municipal performance. Therefore, I also argue that in unfavorable municipal contexts, the potential influence of mayoral qualifications on performance decreases. I use both statistical and survey-experimental methodologies to test the hypotheses derived from the proposed mayoral quality theory. I collected six years of data for the statistical analyses by doing field research across the 40 municipalities that comprise the Colombian Department of Norte of Santander. For the surveyexperimental analysis, I gathered data from interviews and surveys with 120 mayors from 12 Latin American countries, who participated in the II Latin American Congress of Cities and Local Governments held in Cali, Colombia, on July 26-29, 2006. The statistical findings reveal that mayoral qualificationseducation and jobrelated experiencepositively influence municipal performance with respect to education enrollment, tax property collection, and social program investment. However, the positive impact that mayoral qualifications have on such performance indicators decreases under external constraints, such as the presence of illegal armed groups. From the survey-experimental study, findings show that issue salience (or nature of municipal need) moderates the impact that mayoral qualifications have on mayors decision-making. In education issues, for example, qualified mayors are more likely to perform better, while in infrastructure issues they are less likely to do so.

Avellaneda, Claudia Nancy

2007-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

40

Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2008 2008 Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE Entergy Corporation v. EPA; PSEG Fossil LLC v. Riverkeeper, Inc.; Utility Water Group v. Riverkeeper, Inc., S. Ct. Nos. 07-588, 07-589, and 07-597. The question presented in this litigation is whether Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1326(b), authorizes EPA to compare costs and benefits in determining the "best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact" at cooling water intake structures. The Second Circuit held that EPA may not engage in cost-benefit analysis in determining the "best technology available," and that consideration of cost is limited to choosing "a less expensive technology that achieves essentially the same results" as the best technology that industry can reasonably bear. EPA did

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Memorandum of American High-Performance Buildings Coalition DOE Meeting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Memorandum of American High-Performance Buildings Coalition DOE Memorandum of American High-Performance Buildings Coalition DOE Meeting August 19, 2013 Memorandum of American High-Performance Buildings Coalition DOE Meeting August 19, 2013 This memorandum is intended to provide a summary of a meeting between the American HighPerformance Buildings Coalition (AHBPC), a coalition of industry organizations committed to promoting performance-based energy efficiency and sustainable building standards developed through true, consensus-bases processes, and the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) that took place on Monday, August 19, 2013. Memorandum of AHPBC DOE Meeting_8_19_2013_FINAL_SIGNED More Documents & Publications Federal Leadership in High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Memorandum

42

Review of DOE HQ Emergency Response Plans and Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance March 2003 Prepared by Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT AND PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE REVIEW OF DOE HEADQUARTERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS AND PERFORMANCE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted a review of emergency response plans and performance at DOE Headquarters (HQ) in February 2003. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the readiness and effectiveness of the DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) emergency response teams for a postulated emergency at a field site, and the HQ Incident Command Team for an emergency affecting the Forrestal building. In addition,

43

DOE O 413.2B Admin Chg 1, Laboratory Directed Research and Development  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order establishes DOE requirements for laboratory directed research and development (LDRD) while providing the laboratory director broad flexibility for ...

2006-04-19T23:59:59.000Z

44

DOE RFP Seeks Projects for Improving Environmental Performance of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE RFP Seeks Projects for Improving Environmental Performance of DOE RFP Seeks Projects for Improving Environmental Performance of Unconventional Natural Gas Technologies DOE RFP Seeks Projects for Improving Environmental Performance of Unconventional Natural Gas Technologies December 21, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - Research projects to study ways for improving the environmental performance of unconventional gas development are being sought by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), a facility of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy. The research opportunity was released in a request for proposals (RFP) issued by NETL's contractor, the Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America (RPSEA), with a deadline of March 6, 2012. A second RFP, focusing on the needs of small oil and natural gas producers, was released

45

NETL: News Release - DOE Issues Report on Cost and Performance...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7, 2007 DOE Issues Report on Cost and Performance of Fossil Energy Plants Baseline Estimates Will Help Measure Progress and Establish R&D Needs Washington, DC - The U.S. Department...

46

Training Framework to Improve the DOE Performance-Based Culture...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the Department. Training Framework Improve Performance Responsible Contacts N. Tony Nguyen PROGRAM ANALYST E-mail tony.nguyen@hq.doe.gov Phone 202-586-4533 More Documents &...

47

Direct PCR with PowerPlex 18D: Performance and ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. Direct PCR with PowerPlex 18D: Performance and Concordance ... Benefits of Direct PCR Sample set-up convenience: 'punch and go' ...

2011-09-12T23:59:59.000Z

48

Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 During Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, we reviewed a variety of critical areas relevant to the Department's mission priorities. One of our goals, for example, was to examine possible programmatic improvements in Department operations relating to cyber security and contract management. Overall, our efforts resulted in the issuance of over 70 audit and inspection reports containing recommendations for enhancing Departmental operations, with likely savings of over $7 million. Further as a result of our investigative efforts, we obtained 20 criminal convictions, recovered $22.8 million in

49

2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to the White  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to the 2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to the White House Council on Environmental Quality and Office of Management and Budget 2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to the White House Council on Environmental Quality and Office of Management and Budget Sustainability is fundamental to the Department of Energy's research mission and operations as reflected in the Department's Strategic Plan. Our overarching mission is to discover the solutions to power and secure America's future. We are implementing our mission through three strategic goals: Innovation to maintain U.S. global leadership in science and engineering; Energy to build a competitive and sustainable clean energy economy to secure America's energy future; and Security to reduce nuclear

50

DOE site performance assessment activities. Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Information on performance assessment capabilities and activities was collected from eight DOE sites. All eight sites either currently dispose of low-level radioactive waste (LLW) or plan to dispose of LLW in the near future. A survey questionnaire was developed and sent to key individuals involved in DOE Order 5820.2A performance assessment activities at each site. The sites surveyed included: Hanford Site (Hanford), Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site (NTS), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (Paducah), Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (Portsmouth), and Savannah River Site (SRS). The questionnaire addressed all aspects of the performance assessment process; from waste source term to dose conversion factors. This report presents the information developed from the site questionnaire and provides a comparison of site-specific performance assessment approaches, data needs, and ongoing and planned activities. All sites are engaged in completing the radioactive waste disposal facility performance assessment required by DOE Order 5820.2A. Each site has achieved various degrees of progress and have identified a set of critical needs. Within several areas, however, the sites identified common needs and questions.

Not Available

1990-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Performance assessment of DOE spent nuclear fuel and surplus plutonium  

SciTech Connect

Yucca Mountain, in southern Nevada, is under consideration by the US Department of Energy (DOE) as a potential site for the disposal of the nation`s radioactive wastes in a geologic repository. The wastes consist of commercial spent fuel, DOE spent nuclear fuel (SNF), high level waste (HLW), and surplus plutonium. The DOE was mandated by Congress in the fiscal 1997 Energy and Water Appropriations Act to complete a viability assessment (VA) of the repository in September of 1998. The assessment consists of a preliminary design concept for the critical elements of the repository, a total system performance assessment (TSPA), a plan and cost estimate for completion of the license application, and an estimate of the cost to construct and operate the repository. This paper presents the results of the sensitivity analyses that were conducted to examine the behavior of DOE SNF and plutonium waste forms in the environment of the base case repository that was modeled for the TSPA-VA. Fifteen categories of DOE SNF and two Plutonium waste forms were examined and their contribution to radiation dose to humans was evaluated.

Duguid, J.O.; Vallikat, V.; McNeish, J.

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

52

DOE Buildings Performance Database, sample Residential data | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Buildings Performance Database, sample Residential data Buildings Performance Database, sample Residential data Dataset Summary Description This is a non-proprietary subset of DOE's Buildings Performance Database. Buildings from the cities of Dayton, OH and Gainesville, FL areas are provided as an example of the data in full database. Sample data here is formatted as CSV The Buildings Performance Database will have an API that allows access to the statistics about the data without exposing private information about individual buildings. The data available in this sample is limited due to the nature of the original datasets; the Buildings Performance database combines data from multiple sources to improve overall robustness. Data fields stored in the database can be seen in the BPD taxonomy: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/buildingsperformance/taxonomy.html

53

DOE Workshop on Hydrogen Production via Direct Fermentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Workshop on Workshop on H H Y Y D D R R O O G G E E N N P P R R O O D D U U C C T T I I O O N N V V I I A A D D I I R R E E C C T T F F E E R R M M E E N N T T A A T T I I O O N N June 9, 2004 Baltimore, Maryland DOE-OFFICE OF HYDROGEN, FUEL CELLS AND INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................1 Workshop Format ......................................................................................................1 Workshop Results ......................................................................................................2 TABLES Table 1. Results of Group Discussion on Neoterics/NREL Boundary Analysis Report .................................................................................................................

54

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL February 2001  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Environmental Management Performance Report (EMPR) is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office's (DOE-RL's) report of Hanford's Environmental Management (EM) performance by: Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) through Fluor Hanford. Inc. (FH) and its subcontractors; Environmental Restoration Contract through Bechtel Hanford. Inc. (BHI), and its subcontractors; and Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL) for Science and Technology support to the EM Mission. This report is a monthly publication that summarizes EM Site performance under RL, Operations Office. It is organized by the three sections listed above, with each section containing an Executive Summary and Area Performance Summaries. A glossary of terms is provided at the end of this report for reference purposes.

EDER, D.M.

2001-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

55

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL November 2001  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Environmental Management Performance Report (EMPR) is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office's (DOE-RL's) report of Hanford's Environmental Management (EM) performance by: Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) through Fluor Hanford, Inc. (FH) and its subcontractors, Environmental Restoration Contract through Bechtel Hanford, Inc. (BHI), and its subcontractors, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL) for Science and Technology support to the EM Mission. This report is a monthly publication that summarizes EM Site performance under RL Operations Office. It is organized by the three sections listed above, with each section containing an Executive Summary and Area Performance Summaries. A glossary of terms is provided at the end of this report for reference purposes.

EDER, D.M.

2001-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

56

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL August 2001  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Environmental Management Performance Report (EMPR) is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office's (DOE-RL's) report of Hanford's Environmental Management (EM) performance by: Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) through Fluor Hanford, Inc. (FH) and its subcontractors, Environmental Restoration Contract through Bechtel Hanford, Inc. (BHI), and its subcontractors, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL) for Science and Technology support to the EM Mission. This report is a monthly publication that summarizes EM Site performance under RL Operations Office. It is organized by the three sections listed above, with each section containing an Executive Summary and Area Performance Summaries. A glossary of terms is provided at the end of this report for reference purposes.

EDER, D.M.

2001-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

57

APPLICATION OF DOE-2 TO RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  

SciTech Connect

One important requirement emerging from national and international efforts to shift from our present energy-intensive way of life to an energy conservation mode is the development of standards for assessing and regulating energy use and performance in buildings. This paper describes a life-cycle-cost approach to Building Energy Performance Standards (BEPS) calculated by using DOE-2: The Energy Use Analysis of Buildings Computer Program. The procedure outlined raises important questions that must be answered before the energy budgets devised from this approach can be reliably used as a policy tool, The DOE-2 program was used to calculate the energy consumption in prototype buildings and in their modified versions in which energy conservation measures were effected. The energy use of a modified building with lowest life-cycle-cost determines the energy budget for all buildings of that type. These calculations were based on a number of assumptions that may be controversial. These assumptions regard accuracy of the model, comparison of the DOE-2 program with other programs, stability of the energy budget, and sensitivity of the results to variations in the building parameters.

Lokmanhekim, M.; Goldstein, D. B.; Levine, M. D.; Rosenfield, A. H.

1980-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

58

Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, C. Phillips, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters - please see document for full distribution list, including SSAB Administrators, Designated Deputy Federal Officers, SSAB Federal Coordinators and Office Site Managers The letter is in regards to progress made to date in implementing a direct DOE relationship and funding for the EM Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 22, 2003 More Documents & Publications Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management

59

Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, C. Phillips, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters - please see document for full distribution list, including SSAB Administrators, Designated Deputy Federal Officers, SSAB Federal Coordinators and Office Site Managers The letter is in regards to progress made to date in implementing a direct DOE relationship and funding for the EM Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 22, 2003 More Documents & Publications Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management

60

Microsoft Word - DOE-ID-11-002 DOE Direct cooling system [1].doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 SECTION A. Project Title: Cooling System for Substation Bldg CPP-613 SECTION B. Project Description The scope of work includes the purchase and installation of an Energy Star compliant 208V three phase staged cooling system capable of maintaining CPP-613 at a temperature below 85 degrees F. The system shall be designed to operate at an elevation of 5000 feet with outside environmental temperatures ranging from -20°F to 100°F. The cooling system shall be pad mounted on the east side of the building between the two cable feeds. The concrete pad will be provided by DOE. The scope of work includes purchasing an appropriately sized cooling system, placing the unit on the concrete pad, making all necessary wall penetrations into the building, installing ductwork and air handlers inside the building, and installing a

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Material Handling Equipment Demonstration - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Todd Ramsden National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 275-3704 Email: todd.ramsden@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Peter Devlin Phone: (202) 586-4905 Email: Peter.Devlin@ee.doe.gov Subcontractor: Oorja Protonics, Inc., Fremont, CA Project Start Date: June 1, 2010 Project End Date: March 31, 2013 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Operate and maintain fuel-cell-powered material * handling equipment (MHE) using direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) technology. Compile operational data of DMFCs and validate their * performance under real-world operating conditions. Provide an independent technology assessment that * focuses on DMFC system performance, operation, and

62

DOE Office of Indian Energy Foundational Course on Direct Use for Building Heat and Hot Water  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Direct Use for Building Direct Use for Building Heat and Hot Water Webinar (text version) Below is the text version of the Webinar titled "DOE Office of Indian Energy Foundational Courses Renewable Energy Technologies: Direct Use for Building Heat and Hot Water." Slide 1 Amy Hollander: Hello, I'm Amy Hollander with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Welcome to today's webinar on Building Heat and Hot Water sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs. This webinar is being recorded from DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory's new state-of-the-art net zero

63

The EPRI/DOE Utility Wind Turbine Performance Verification Program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In 1992, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and the US Department of Energy (DOE) initiated the Utility Wind Turbine Performance Verification Program (TVP). This paper provides an overview of the TVP, its purpose and goals, and the participating utility projects. Improved technology has significantly reduced the cost of energy from wind turbines since the early 1980s. In 1992, turbines were producing electricity for about $0.07--$0.09/kilowatt-hour (kWh) (at 7 m/s [16 mph sites]), compared with more than $0.30/kWh in 1980. Further technology improvements were expected to lower the cost of energy from wind turbines to $0.05/kWh. More than 17,000 wind turbines, totaling more than 1,500 MW capacity, were installed in the US, primarily in California and Hawaii. The better wind plants had availabilities above 95%, capacity factors exceeding 30%, and operation and maintenance costs of $0.01/kWh. However, despite improving technology, EPRI and DOE recognized that utility use of wind turbines was still largely limited to turbines installed in California and Hawaii during the 1980s. Wind resource assessments showed that other regions of the US, particularly the Midwest, had abundant wind resources. EPRI and DOE sought to provide a bridge from utility-grade turbine development programs under way to commercial purchases of the wind turbines. The TVP was developed to allow utilities to build and operate enough candidate turbines to gain statistically significant operating and maintenance data.

Calvert, S.; Goldman, P. [Department of Energy, Washington, DC (United States); DeMeo, E.; McGowin, C. [Electric Power Research Inst., Palo Alto, CA (United States); Smith, B.; Tromly, K. [National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO (United States)

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

64

Performance objectives and criteria for conducting DOE environmental audits  

SciTech Connect

This document contains the Performance Objectives and Criteria (POC) that have been developed for environmental audits and assessments conducted by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health. The Environmental POC can serve multiple purposes. Primarily, they are to serve as guidelines for the technical specialists conducted the audits and assessments, and for the team management. The POC can also serve as supporting documents for training of technical discipline specialists and Team Leaders and as bases for DOE programs and field offices and contractors conducting audit or assessment activities or improving environmental protection programs. It must be recognized that not all of the POC will necessarily apply to all DOE facilities. The users of this document must rely upon their knowledge of the facility and their professional judgment, or the judgment of qualified environmental professionals to determine the applicability of each POC. The POC cover eleven technical disciplines: air; surface water and drinking water quality; groundwater; waste management; toxic and chemical materials; radiation; quality assurance; inactive waste sites and releases; ecological and cultural resources; the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); and environmental management systems.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

65

DOE Order 435.1- Performance Assessments and Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This page focuses on DOE Order 435.1, Performance Assessments and Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluations.

66

Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE Entergy Corporation v. EPA; PSEG Fossil LLC v. Riverkeeper, Inc.; Utility Water Group v. Riverkeeper, Inc., S. Ct. Nos. 07-588, 07-589, and 07-597. The question presented in this litigation is whether Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1326(b), authorizes EPA to compare costs and benefits in determining the "best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact" at cooling water intake structures. The Second Circuit held that EPA may not engage in cost-benefit analysis in determining the "best technology available," and that consideration of cost is limited to choosing "a less expensive technology that achieves essentially the same results" as the best technology that

67

The Center for Computational Sciences DOE High Performance Computing Research Center at Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 The Center for Computational Sciences DOE High Performance Computing Research Center at Oak Ridge Sciences DOE High Performance Computing Research Center at Oak Ridge National Laboratory Outline · CCS for Computational Sciences DOE High Performance Computing Research Center at Oak Ridge National Laboratory CCS

68

Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Laboratories » LPE Home » Laboratory Directed Laboratories » LPE Home » Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process Laboratory Planning Process Work for Others in the Office of Science Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) DOE's Philosophy on LDRD Frequently Asked Questions Success Stories Brochures Additional Information LDRD Program Contacts Technology Transfer DOE National Laboratories Contact Information Laboratory Policy and Evaluation U.S. Department of Energy SC-32/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5447 F: (202) 586-3119 Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Department of Energy's Engine of Discovery

69

DOE Sustainability Performance Office FY14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OFFICE FY14 BUDGET AT-A-GLANCE DOE SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE OFFICE FY 14 BUDGET AT-A-GLANCE The Sustainability Performance Office (SPO) supports DOE's internal activities to meet goals related to sustainability, including energy; water; land and paper conservation and use; greenhouse gas emission reductions; and other objectives related to sustainability such as the development of DOE's annual Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan (SSPP). The SPO provides support and assistance to the DOE Senior Sustainability Officer, Under Secretaries, Power Marketing Administrations, and National Laboratories and sites, in support of all DOE sustainability efforts. The SPO ensures the integration and coordination of sustainability activities across DOE and, with respect to

70

DOE Office of Indian Energy Foundational Course on Direct Use for Building Heat and Hot Water  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DIRECT USE FOR BUILDING HEAT & HOT WATER Presented by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory Course Outline 2 What we will cover...  About the DOE Office of Indian Energy Education Initiative  Course Introduction  Solar Thermal and Solar Ventilation Air Pre-Heat - Resources, Technology, Examples & Cost, and References  Biomass Heat - Resources, Technology, Examples & Cost, and References  Geothermal Building Heat - Resources, Technology, Examples & Cost, and References  Additional Information & Resources Introduction The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs is responsible for assisting Tribes with energy planning and development, infrastructure, energy costs, and electrification of Indian

71

SUMMARY REPORT OF THE DOE DIRECT LIQUEFACTION PROCESS DEVELOPMENT CAMPAIGN OF THE LATE TWENTIETH CENTURY  

SciTech Connect

Following the petroleum price and supply disruptions of 1973, the U.S. government began a substantial program to fund the development of alternative fuels. Direct coal liquefaction was one of the potential routes to alternative fuels. The direct coal liquefaction program was funded at substantial levels through 1982, and at much lower levels thereafter. Those processes that were of most interest during this period were designed to produce primarily distillate fuels. By 1999, U.S. government funding for the development of direct coal liquefaction ended. Now that the end of this campaign has arrived, it is appropriate to summarize the process learnings derived from it. This report is a summary of the process learnings derived from the DOE direct coal liquefaction process development campaign of the late twentieth century. The report concentrates on those process development programs that were designed to produce primarily distillate fuels and were largely funded by DOE and its predecessors in response to the petroleum supply and price disruptions of the 1970s. The report is structured as chapters written by different authors on most of the major individual DOE-funded process development programs. The focus of the report is process learnings, as opposed to, say, fundamental coal liquefaction science or equipment design. As detailed in the overview (Chapter 2), DOE's direct coal liquefaction campaign made substantial progress in improving the process yields and the quality of the distillate product. Much of the progress was made after termination by 1983 of the major demonstration programs of the ''first generation'' (SRC-II, H-Coal, EDS) processes.

F.P. Burke; S.D. Brandes; D.C. McCoy; R.A. Winschel; D. Gray; G. Tomlinson

2001-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

72

Thermal performance of a geofluid direct-contact heat exchanger  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A sieve-tray direct-contact heat exchanger was used to transfer heat from a 280/sup 0/F geothermal fluid to the working fluid, isobutane, in the Raft River 60kW prototype plant. A series of experiments were run at different working fluid-to-geofluid flow ratios which produced different boiling conditions. In this paper, the results of these experiments are analyzed on the basis of thermal performance. The flow ratio, the geofluid outlet temperature, the working fluid inlet temperature, the amount of working fluid dissolved or entrained in geofluid, and tray efficiency are varied and preheating temperature profiles are calculated. These are compared with the experimentally obtained temperature profiles and the relative effects of the variables are evaluated. From this, it was determined that the approach temperature difference was on the order of .1/sup 0/ after 17 preheating trays, and the tray efficiencies, which appear to be about the same for all trays, reached approx. 70%. It was also determined that entrainment has a negligible effect on column thermal performance. The thermal performance of this column compares favorably with a spray-tower direct-contact heat exchanger and a shell-and-tube heat exchanger in terms of overall heat-transfer coefficient. Distributor tray and boiling tray behavior are discussed. These is some discussion of operations and thermal hydraulics as well.

Wiggins, D.J.; Mines, G.L.; Wahl, E.

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

DOE Science Showcase - High-Performance Computing | OSTI, US...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Science Showcase - High-Performance Computing Supercomputers or massively parallel high-performance computers (HPCs) are machines that employ very large numbers of processors in...

74

Paper on "Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NOTE TO: Cynthia L. Quarterman NOTE TO: Cynthia L. Quarterman Department of Energy Agency Review Team FROM: Janet Z. Barsy Qi Special AssistantO ffice of the General Counsel SUBJECT: Paper on "Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE" DATE: December 5, 2008 At our meeting on November 24, 2008, you expressed an interest in major litigation of direct interest to the Department where DOE has an interest in the outcome of the suit although it is not a party to the litigation. Attached is a paper prepared by the Office of the Deputy General Counsel for Litigation that summarizes such cases. The claims in one of the cases, E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Stanton, are briefly discussed in the Transition Paper entitled Pending Significant Litigation Matters under the section "Alleged Exposures to Radioactive and/or Toxic

75

DOE G 413.3-6A, High Performance Sustainable Building  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Guide provides approaches for implementing the High Performance Sustainable Building (HPSB) requirements of DOE Order 413.3B, Program and Project ...

2011-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

76

DOE-Supported Technology Passes Scale-Up Test Converting CO DOE-Sponsored Research Improves Gas Turbine Performance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

into Valuable Materials into Valuable Materials Publications News Release Release Date: June 17, 2013 DOE-Sponsored Research Improves Gas Turbine Performance DOE Lab Receives Award for Work on Drilling Technology An innovative airfoil manufacturing technology that promises to improve the performance of state-of-the-art gas turbines has been commercialized through research sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy. Photo courtesy of Mikro Systems, Inc. Washington, D.C. - An innovative airfoil manufacturing technology that promises to improve the performance of state-of-the-art gas turbines has been commercialized through research sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The technology - which is expected to contribute to cleaner, more reliable and affordable domestic energy production as well as creating new

77

DOE 2010 Safety and Security Reform Project - HSS Directives Disposition and Status (December 4, 2012)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10 Safety and Security Reform Project - HSS Directives Disposition and Status (December 4, 2012) 10 Safety and Security Reform Project - HSS Directives Disposition and Status (December 4, 2012) Page 1 of 3 2010 HSS Directives Disposition Status Secretary of Energy Notice SEN-35-91, Nuclear Safety Policy Revise Complete - see Policy 420.1. Order 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment Revise Complete - see Order 458.1. Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Revise Complete - see Order 422.1. Order 5480.20A, Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements Revise Complete - see Order 426.2. Order 5480.30, Nuclear Reactor Design Criteria Re-certify Complete - re-certified. Manual 140.1-1B, Interface with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Re-certify Complete - re-certified.

78

Performance of DOE's micellar-polymer project in northwest Oklahoma  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

DOE's Bartlesville Energy Technology Center has completed a micellar-polymer flood in the Delaware Childers Field in NE Oklahoma. Micellar-polymer flooding uses a combination of low interfacial tension and mobility control in producing reservoir that usually has been successfully waterflood. A test site was selected after consideration of other possible sites reasonably close to BETC. The selected micellar-polymer fluids were injected into a central injection well, displaced through the formation, and produced from four surrounding production wells. Eight water injection wells surrounding the test pattern were used to afford an effective outer boundary for fluid containment. 9 refs.

Thomas, R.D.; Spence, K.L.; Burtch, F.W.; Lorenz, P.B.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

79

Program in geothermal well technology directed toward achieving DOE/DGE power-on-line goals  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document presents the material used in an oral presentation to the DOE/Division of Geothermal Energy, which was designed to illustrate the importance of well technology development in reducing geothermal well costs, and to achieve geothermal power-on-line goals. Examination of recent studies of the economics of geothermal energy leads to the conclusion that the overall sensitivity of geothermal power-on-line to well cost is in the range of one to two. Current data suggest that a vigorous R and D program in rotary drilling technology can reduce geothermal drilling costs by about 20%, but a reduction of 40 to 50% is needed to achieve DOE/DGE goals. Research in advanced drilling systems is needed to satisfy this more stringent requirement. Some critical technological deficiencies that occur when current rotary drilling techniques are used for geothermal drilling are discussed. A broadly based development program directed at correcting these deficiencies is defined.

Polito, J.; Varnado, S.G.

1978-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

80

DOE/EA-1837:Final Environmental Assessment for the Performance Verification Laboratory (January 2011)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Assessment for the Performance Verification Laboratory January 2011 DOE/EA-1837 This page left intentionally blank. Performance Verification Laboratory DOE/EA-1837 U.S. Department of Energy Final Environmental Assessment National Energy Technology Laboratory January 2011 i National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Cover Sheet Proposed Action: U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) is proposing to construct and operate a Performance Verification Laboratory (PVL) facility to be located on the Morgantown NETL site in West Virginia. NETL would design, construct, and make operational a DOE PVL facility for verifying the energy performance of selected appliances and equipment to facilitate improved enforcement of DOE energy conservation

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

DOE Hydrogen Analysis Repository: Hydrogen Analysis Projects by Performing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Performing Organization Performing Organization Below are hydrogen analyses and analytical models grouped by performing organization. A B D E F G I L M N O P R S T U W A Aalborg University Wind Power Integration Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Ceramic Membrane Reactors for Converting Natural Gas to Hydrogen Hydrogen Energy Station Validation Anhui University of Technology Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Vehicle Pathways in Shanghai Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) Advanced Vehicle Introduction Decisions (AVID) Model AirCRED Model All Modular Industry Growth Assessment (AMIGA) Model Biofuels in Light-Duty Vehicles Consumer Adoption and Infrastructure Development Including Combined Hydrogen, Heat, and Power Cost Implications of Hydrogen Quality Requirements

82

High performance computing: Clusters, constellations, MPPs, and future directions  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Jim Gray, High Performance Computing: Crays, Clusters,The Marketplace of High-Performance Computing, ParallelHigh Performance Computing Clusters, Constellations, MPPs,

Dongarra, Jack; Sterling, Thomas; Simon, Horst; Strohmaier, Erich

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL December 2000  

SciTech Connect

This section provides an executive level summary of the performance information covered in this report and is intended to bring to Management's attention that information considered to be most noteworthy. All cost, schedule, milestone commitments, performance measures, and safety data is current as of October 31. Accomplishments, Issues and Integration items are current as of November 17 unless otherwise noted. The section begins with a description of notable accomplishments that have occurred since the last report and are considered to have made the greatest contribution toward safe, timely, and cost-effective clean up. Following the accomplishment section is an overall fiscal year-to-date summary analysis addressing cost, schedule, and milestone performance. Overviews of safety ensue. The next segment of the Executive Summary, entitled Critical Issues, is designed to identify the high-level challenges to achieving cleanup progress. The next section includes FY 2001 EM Management Commitment High Visibility Project Milestones and Critical Few Performance Measures. The Key Integration Activities section follows next, highlighting PHMC activities that cross contractor boundaries and demonstrate the shared value of partnering with other Site entities to accomplish the work. Concluding the Executive Summary, a forward-looking synopsis of Upcoming Planned Key Events is provided.

EDER, D.M.

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

Performance of DOE's micellar-polymer project in northwest Oklahoma  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

DOE's Bartlesville Energy Technology Center has completed a micellar-polymer flood in the Delaware-Childers Field in NE Oklahoma. The producing horizon was the oil-wet Bartlesville sandstone, at a depth of 620 to 700 ft., which has a net pay thickness of 52 ft, an average permeability of 100 md, and an average porisity of 21 percent. Estimated oil saturation was 32 to 36 percent of 33/sup 0/ API gravity oil. Injection of the approximately 0.1 PV of micellar fluid was started April 28, 1976, following five months of brine preflush. Micellar injection was completed and polymer injection started October 5, 1976. Injection of the approximately 0.4 PV of polymer was completed in August 1979 and fresh water injection started. Pressure and flow for the injection wells were monitored instrumentally. Spot checks for the quality of injected and produced fluids were made by chemical analysis. The project was not technically or economically a success, but did provide much information that is proving useful in other similar projects. A small amount of tertiary oil was produced by the micellar-polymer system.

Thomas, R.D.; Spence, K.L.; Burtch, F.W.; Lorenz, P.B.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

85

IMPROVING CONSISTENCY OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS IN THE DOE COMPLEX  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The low-level waste (LLW) performance assessment (PA) process has been traditionally focused on disposal facilities at a few United States Department of Energy (USDOE) sites and commercial disposal facilities. In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the scope of the use of PA-like modeling approaches, involving multiple activities, facilities, contractors and regulators. The scope now includes, for example: (1) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) assessments, (2) CERCLA disposal cells, (3) Waste Determinations and High-Level Waste (HLW) Closure activities, (4) Potential on-site disposal of Transuranic (TRU) waste, and (5) In-situ decommissioning (including potential use of existing facilities for disposal). The dramatic increase in the variety of activities requiring more detailed modeling has resulted in a similar increase in the potential for inconsistency in approaches both at a site and complexwide scale. This paper includes a summary of USDOE Environmental Management (EM) sponsored initiatives and activities for improved consistency. New initiatives entitled the Performance Assessment Community of Practice and Performance Assessment Assistance Team are also introduced.

Seitz, R; Elmer Wilhite, E

2009-01-20T23:59:59.000Z

86

Measured and projected performance of plasma direct converters  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Test results from two plasma direct converters and their predicted cost and performance on tandem mirror fusion reactors are present. The tests were done at high power density (approx. 70 W/cm/sup 2/) in steady state to simulate the predicted conditions in a reactor. A single stage unit and a two-stage unit of the Venetian blind type were tested at up to 100 kV and 6 kW for a total time of about 80 hours. Measured efficiencies, when projected to a reactor, are typically about 50% for a single stage unit and 60 to 70% for a two-stage unit, depending on the energy distribution of the ions, the degree of subdivision of the collectors, and on the gas pressure. The high ambipolar potential in tandem mirror devices makes this good efficiency possible. When radiatively cooled grids are used, the incident power density is limited to about 100 W/cm/sup 2/ by the thermionic emission of electrons.

Barr, W.L.; Moir, R.W.

1981-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

87

LABORATORY DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL REPORT TO THE DOE - DECEMBER 2001.  

SciTech Connect

Brookhaven National (BNL) Laboratory is a multidisciplinary laboratory that carries out basic and applied research in the physical, biomedical, and environmental sciences, and in selected energy technologies. It is managed by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC, under contract with the U. S. Department of Energy. BNL's total annual budget has averaged about $450 million. There are about 3,000 employees, and another 4,500 guest scientists and students who come each year to use the Laboratory's facilities and work with the staff. The BNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program reports its status to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) annually in March, as required by DOE Order 4 13.2, ''Laboratory Directed Research and Development,'' March 5, 1997, and the LDRD Annual Report guidance, updated February 12, 1999. The LDRD Program obtains its funds through the Laboratory overhead pool and operates under the authority of DOE Order 4 13.2. The goals and objectives of BNL's LDRD Program can be inferred from the Program's stated purposes. These are to (1) encourage and support the development of new ideas and technology, (2) promote the early exploration and exploitation of creative and innovative concepts, and (3) develop new ''fundable'' R&D projects and programs. The emphasis is clearly articulated by BNL to be on supporting exploratory research ''which could lead to new programs, projects, and directions'' for the Laboratory. As one of the premier scientific laboratories of the DOE, BNL must continuously foster groundbreaking scientific research. At Brookhaven National Laboratory one such method is through its LDRD Program. This discretionary research and development tool is critical in maintaining the scientific excellence and long-term vitality of the Laboratory. Additionally, it is a means to stimulate the scientific community and foster new science and technology ideas, which becomes a major factor in achieving and maintaining staff excellence and a means to address national needs within the overall mission of the DOE and BNL. The LDRD Annual Report contains summaries of all research activities funded during Fiscal Year 2001. The Project Summaries with their accomplishments described in this report reflect the above. Aside from leading to new fundable or promising programs and producing especially noteworthy research, the LDRD activities have resulted in numerous publications in various professional and scientific journals and presentations at meetings and forums. All FY 2001 projects are listed and tabulated in the Project Funding Table. Also included in this Annual Report in Appendix A is a summary of the proposed projects for FY 2002. The BNL LDRD budget authority by DOE in FY 2001 was $6 million. The actual allocation totaled $5.3 million. The following sections in this report contain the management processes, peer review, and the portfolio's relatedness to BNL's mission, initiatives and strategic plans. Also included is a metric of success indicators.

FOX,K.J.

2001-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

88

High Performance Computing at TJNAF| U.S. DOE Office of Science...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

(301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information Spinoff Archives High Performance Computing at TJNAF Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Application...

89

Performance and cost models for the direct sulfur recovery process. Task 1 Topical report, Volume 3  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this project is to develop performance and cost models of the Direct Sulfur Recovery Process (DSRP). The DSRP is an emerging technology for sulfur recovery from advanced power generation technologies such as Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) systems. In IGCC systems, sulfur present in the coal is captured by gas cleanup technologies to avoid creating emissions of sulfur dioxide to the atmosphere. The sulfur that is separated from the coal gas stream must be collected. Leading options for dealing with the sulfur include byproduct recovery as either sulfur or sulfuric acid. Sulfur is a preferred byproduct, because it is easier to handle and therefore does not depend as strongly upon the location of potential customers as is the case for sulfuric acid. This report describes the need for new sulfur recovery technologies.

Frey, H.C. [North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC (United States); Williams, R.B. [Carneigie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States)

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

Optimum Performance of Direct Hydrogen Hybrid Fuel Cell Vehicles  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ultracapacitors, fuel cells and hybrid vehicle design. Dr.on electric and hybrid vehicle technology and applicationsand performance. Hybrid vehicles utilizing a load leveling

Zhao, Hengbing; Burke, Andy

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

Performance directed energy management for main memory and disks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Much research has been conducted on energy management for memory and disks. Most studies use control algorithms that dynamically transition devices to low power modes after they are idle for a certain threshold period of time. The control algorithms ... Keywords: Disk energy management, adaptation algorithms, control algorithms, low-power design, memory energy management, multiple-power mode device, performance guarantee

Xiaodong Li; Zhenmin Li; Yuanyuan Zhou; Sarita Adve

2005-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

DOE-HDBK-1028-2009; Human Performance Improvement Handbook, Volume 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

028-2009 028-2009 June 2009 DOE STANDARD HUMAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT HANDBOOK VOLUME 1: CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES U.S. Department of Energy AREA HFAC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-HDBK-1028-2009 i VOLUME 1: CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES PREFACE ....................................................................................................................... v Reading The Handbook ............................................................................................... vi CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN PERFORMANCE..............1-1

93

Direct estimation of the performance of passive structures  

SciTech Connect

Described is an analytical method of computing solar savings fraction for a given load-to-collector ratio of a passive structure in any location. The key to the computation is the use of an algorithm relating the pattern of clear days to the interaction of the thermal storage with transmittted radiation and heat load as well as a correlation of coefficient of performance with the total number of degree days in the heating season and the fraction of possible sun.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

The Adequacy of DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Performance Goals from an Accident Analysis Perspective  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Adequacy of DOE Natural Adequacy of DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Performance Goals from an Accident Analysis Perspective Jeff Kimball Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Staff Department of Energy NPH Conference October 26, 2011 The views expressed are solely those of the author and no official support or endorsement of this presentation by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board or the federal government is intended or should be inferred. 1 OBJECTIVE: Assess whether the DOE NPH performance goal concept as used in the Documented Safety Analysis process is adequate or needs additional guidance Background * ANS Standard 2.26 and the concept of Seismic Design Categories (SDC) and Limit States (LS) * ASCE Standard 43-05 and the concept of Design Categories

95

Does  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Does Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Yu-San Liu Æ Yining Zeng Æ Yonghua Luo Æ Qi Xu Æ Michael E. Himmel Æ Steve J. Smith Æ Shi-You Ding Received: 26 November 2008 / Accepted: 11 May 2009 / Published online: 19 June 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Exoglucanases are key enzymes required for the efficient hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. It has been proposed that exoglucanases hydrolyze cellulose chains in a processive manner to produce primarily cellobiose. Usually, two functional modules are involved in the processive mechanism: a catalytic module and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). In this report, single molecule tracking techniques were used to analyze the molecular motion of CBMs labeled with quantum dots (QDs) and bound to cellulose crystals. By tracking the single QD, we observed that the family 2 CBM from

96

DOE-HDBK-1028-2009; Human Performance Improvement Handbook, Volume 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

028-2009 028-2009 June 2009 DOE STANDARD HUMAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT HANDBOOK VOLUME 2: HUMAN PERFORMANCE TOOLS FOR INDIVIDUALS, WORK TEAMS, AND MANAGEMENT U.S. Department of Energy AREA HFAC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Website at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-HDBK-1028-2009 Human Performance Tools i Foreword This good practice handbook provides a set of practical methods and techniques for anticipating, preventing, and catching active human errors; and, more importantly, identifying and mitigating latent errors attributable to organizational factors.

97

Power Performance Testing Progress in the DOE/EPRI Turbine Verification Program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

As part of the U.S. Department of Energy/Electric Power Research Institute (DOE-EPRI) Wind Turbine Verification Program (TVP), tests are conducted to characterize the power performance of individual wind turbines at each wind project. The testing is performed in a variety of terrain types, including mountains, plains, deserts, and coastal tundra; and under a wide range of atmospheric conditions, from arid to arctic. Initial results and experiences of the testing were reported the WindPower 2000 conference. This paper presents the status of the power performance testing and new results from the past year.

Smith, B. (National Renewable Energy Laboratory); Randall, G.; McCoy, T; Vandenbosche, J. (Global Energy Concepts, LLC)

2001-07-18T23:59:59.000Z

98

Directions to HEP | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

for non U.S. citizens requires at least one month advanced notice. The Office of High Energy Physics is located on the fourth floor of G-wing and H-wing in the DOE complex. a...

99

Directions to BES | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

for non U.S. citizens requires at least one month advanced notice. The Office of Basic Energy Sciences is located on the fourth floor of E-wing and F-wing in the DOE complex....

100

Directions to NP | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Directions to NP Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About NP NP Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (32KB) NP Budget NP Committees of Visitors Directions to NP Local Map NP Jobs Labs &...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

New directions for QA in basic research: The Fermilab/DOE-CH experience  

SciTech Connect

This paper addresses the underlying problems involved in developing institution-wide QA programs at DOE funded basic research facilities, and suggests concrete ways in which QA professionals and basic researchers can find common ground in describing and analyzing those activities to the satisfaction of both communities. The paper is designed to be a springboard into workshop discussions which can define a path for developing institution-wide QA programs based on the experience gained with DOE-CH and Fermilab.

Bodnarczuk, M.

1989-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

102

DOE  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

DOE DOE /E/A- 0202( 83//Q J Sh or t-T er m En er gy O ut lo ok a to m Quar terly Proje ction s Febru ary 1983 Ene rgy Info rma tion Adm inist ratio n Was hing ton, D.C. t rt jrt .or t lor t lor t .lor t- ior t- ior t <.o rt ort . m .er m -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -T erm -T erm -T erm Nrm ue rgy En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y ^n erg y Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Sh ort -T erm 1 Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm

103

Program Direction and Analysis | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Organization » Program Direction and Organization » Program Direction and Analysis Deputy Director for Resource Management Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Organization Chart .pdf file (77KB) Budget Business Policy and Operations Communications and Public Affairs Grants & Contracts Support Human Resources and Administration Program Direction and Analysis Scientific & Technical Information (OSTI) Contact Information Program Direction & Analysis U.S. Department of Energy SC-46/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-7994 F: (301) 903-8583 More Information » Resource Management Organization Program Direction and Analysis Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page The Program Direction budget supports federal salaries and services that

104

DOE G 430.1-1 Chp 7, Direct/Indirect Costs  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This chapter provides recommended categories for direct and indirect elements developed by the Committee for Cost Methods Development (CCMD) and describes ...

1997-03-28T23:59:59.000Z

105

Directions to ASCR | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

(ASCR) ASCR Home About ASCR ASCR Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (33KB) ASCR Budget ASCR Committees of Visitors Directions to ASCR ASCR Jobs ASCR Research ASCR Facilities...

106

AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Security  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

counterintelligence policy and information requirements applicable to the management of unclassified access approval with U.S. and DOE national security and program-specific policies, requirements, and objectives. b. Secretarial Memorandum, Policy Exclusion for Unclassified Foreign National's Access to Department of Energy

Wechsler, Risa H.

107

The Measure of Human Error: Direct and Indirect Performance Shaping Factors  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The goal of performance shaping factors (PSFs) is to provide measures to account for human performance. PSFs fall into two categoriesdirect and indirect measures of human performance. While some PSFs such as time to complete a task are directly measurable, other PSFs, such as fitness for duty, can only be measured indirectly through other measures and PSFs, such as through fatigue measures. This paper explores the role of direct and indirect measures in human reliability analysis (HRA) and the implications that measurement theory has on analyses and applications using PSFs. The paper concludes with suggestions for maximizing the reliability and validity of PSFs.

Ronald L. Boring; Candice D. Griffith; Jeffrey C. Joe

2007-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

DOE Order 435.1 Performance Assessment Savannah River Site | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Order 435.1 Performance Assessment Savannah River Site Order 435.1 Performance Assessment Savannah River Site DOE Order 435.1 Performance Assessment Savannah River Site Performance Assessments (PA) are analyses conducted for low level radioactive waste disposal facilities (or appropriate CERCLA documentation for a low level radioactive waste disposal facility), and are critical in determining the nature and extent of the controls that need to be put in place at the facility being evaluated. There are specific requirements for the protection of the public, workers, and environment that are critical to maintaining safe and effective disposal of radioactive waste and the PA is a risk analysis of the potential hazards of disposing of low level radioactive waste. The review and approval of these evaluations is

109

High Performance Computing at TJNAF| U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Performance Computing at TJNAF Performance Computing at TJNAF Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Spinoff Applications Spinoff Archives SBIR/STTR Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » Spinoff Archives High Performance Computing at TJNAF Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Application/instrumentation: High Performance Computing Developed at: Thomas Jefferson National Laboratory Developed in: 1998 - 2010 Result of NP research: NP computational studies in LQCD

110

DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lex lex 00023 L Projed Tide: u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Phase IL Determination of manium in ~water. U. Project DeKriptioD a&d LHaDea (iDdudiBg Time Period Ova- wlDdr plopasetl actioB will oceur and Projed' DimeDsioas - e.g.. acres dispJaced/distwbal,. eunatioft ~~ ek..): The objective of this project is to desi~ build, deploy and test a field deployable insttt:tm.ent that can perform near-rea1 ~ fully autonomous measurements of uranium in contaminated groundwater plmnes.. The approximate dimensions of the deployable uranium ~ are Z x 2 x 4 feet. The system periodically samples Y«1lter from existing aquifer tubes., and. the sampies are analyzed for u.ranium concentration using a colorimetric cbelation sysWn.. Analytical teSUlts are

111

Directions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

spacer spacer spacer About DOE Organization News Contact Us Search Search Go spacer U.S. Department of Energy header image Science & Technology Energy Sources Energy Efficiency...

112

AISI-DOE Direct Steelmaking Program. Annual report for the year ending November 30, 1993  

SciTech Connect

This program has completed its 5th year since cost-share funding provided by DOE. The following tasks are reported on: budget, patents, talks, and publications; design and construction of gas cleaning and tempering loop; construction of pressurized smelter and operation of combined smelter and offgas system; study for ironmaking demonstration plant and for steelmaking processes; and laboratory research programs at universities and companies.

Aukrust, E.

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

The performance assessment process for DOE low-level waste disposal facilities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Safety of the low-level waste disposal facilities, as well as al US DOE facilities, is a primary criterion in their design and operation. Safety of low-level waste disposal facilities is evaluated from two perspectives. Operational safety is evaluated based on the perceived level of hazard of the operation. The safety evaluations vary from simple safety assessments to very complex safety analysis reports, depending on the degree of hazard associated with the facility operation. Operational requirements for the Department's low-level waste disposal facilities, including long-term safety are contained in DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Management (1). This paper will focus on the process of conducting long-term performance analyses rather than on operational safety analysis.

Wilhite, E.L.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

The performance assessment process for DOE low-level waste disposal facilities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Safety of the low-level waste disposal facilities, as well as al US DOE facilities, is a primary criterion in their design and operation. Safety of low-level waste disposal facilities is evaluated from two perspectives. Operational safety is evaluated based on the perceived level of hazard of the operation. The safety evaluations vary from simple safety assessments to very complex safety analysis reports, depending on the degree of hazard associated with the facility operation. Operational requirements for the Department`s low-level waste disposal facilities, including long-term safety are contained in DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Management (1). This paper will focus on the process of conducting long-term performance analyses rather than on operational safety analysis.

Wilhite, E.L.

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

DOE passive-solar Class A performance-evaluation program: preliminary results  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The major objective of the DOE Passive Solar Class A Performance Evaluation Program is to collect, analyze, and archive detailed test data for the rigorous validation of analysis/design tools used for passive solar research and design. Elements of the plan for Class A validation are described. A proposed validation methodology, including both analytical and empirical tests, a quantitative definition of validation, minimum data requirements, and a standard reporting format, is outlined. The preliminary testing of this methodology using hourly data from two Class A test facilities is presented. Finally, the collection, analysis, and documentation of preliminary data sets is discussed.

Hunn, B.D.; Turk, W.V.; Wray, W.O.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

Comparison of Projections to Actual Performance in the DOE-EPRI Wind Turbine Verification Program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

As part of the US Department of Energy/Electric Power Research Institute (DOE-EPRI) Wind Turbine Verification Program (TVP), Global Energy Concepts (GEC) worked with participating utilities to develop a set of performance projections for their projects based on historical site atmospheric conditions, turbine performance data, operation and maintenance (O and M) strategies, and assumptions about various energy losses. After a preliminary operation period at each project, GEC compared the actual performance to projections and evaluated the accuracy of the data and assumptions that formed the performance projections. This paper presents a comparison of 1999 power output, turbine availability, and other performance characteristics to the projections for TVP projects in Texas, Vermont, Iowa, Nebraska, Wisconsin, and Alaska. Factors that were overestimated or underestimated are quantified. Actual wind speeds are compared to projections based on long-term historical measurements. Turbine power curve measurements are compared with data provided by the manufacturers, and loss assumptions are evaluated for accuracy. Overall, the projects performed well, particularly new commercial turbines in the first few years of operation. However, some sites experienced below average wind resources and greater than expected losses. The TVP project owners successfully developed and constructed wind power plants that are now in full commercial operation, serving a total of approximately 12,000 households.

Rhoads, H.; VandenBosche, J.; McCoy, T.; Compton, A. (Global Energy Concepts, LLC); Smith, B. (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

2000-09-11T23:59:59.000Z

117

DOE/EIA-0466(86) Energy Information Administration Profiles of Foreign Direct  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6) 6) Energy Information Administration Profiles of Foreign Direct Investment in U.S. Energy 1986 \ This publication is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO). Ordering infor mation and purchase of this and other Energy Information Administration (EIA) publications may be obtained from the GPO or the EIA's National Energy Information Center (NEIC). Questions on energy statistics should be directed to the NEIC. Addresses and telephone numbers appear below. National Energy Information Center, El-231 Energy Information Administration Forrestal Building Room 1F-048 Washington, DC 20585 (202) 586-8800 Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington. DC 20402 (202) 783-3238 Released for Printing December 23, 1987

118

DOE/EIA-0466(85) Energy Information Administration Profiles of Foreign Direct  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5) 5) Energy Information Administration Profiles of Foreign Direct Investme nt in U.S. Energy 1985 is publication is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO). Ordering information and purchase of this and other Energy Information Administration (EIA) publications may be obtained from the GPO or the EIA's National Energy Information Center (NEIC). Questions on energy statistics should be directed to the NEIC. Addresses and telephone numbers appear below. National Energy Information Center, El-20 Energy Information Administration Forrestal Building Room 1F-048 Washington, DC 20585 (202) 586-8800 Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 (202) 783-3238 Released for Printing January 9, 1987

119

Economic assessment of geothermal direct heat technology: A review of five DOE demonstration projects  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In this report the cost of using low temperature geothermal energy resources for direct heating applications is compared to the costs associated with conventional heating fuels. The projects compared all involved replacing conventional fuels (e.g., natural gas and fuel oils) with geothermal energy in existing heating systems. The cost of using geothermal energy in existing systems was also compared with the cost of new coal-fired equipment.

Hederman, William F. Jr.; Cohen, Laura A.

1981-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Does growth subsume the implications of accruals for future firm performance?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Maxwell, and A. Siddique, 2004. Does the stock market under-Li, D. , and L. Zhang, 2000. Does q-theory with investmentDoes growth subsume the implications of accruals for future

Chu, Jenny

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Performance Analysis Tools Working Session | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Performance Analysis Tools Working Performance Analysis Tools Working Session Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) ASCR Home About Research Applied Mathematics Computer Science Exascale Tools Workshop Programming Challenges Workshop Architectures I Workshop External link Architectures II Workshop External link Next Generation Networking Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) Computational Science Graduate Fellowship (CSGF) ASCR SBIR-STTR Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of ASCR Funding Opportunities Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) News & Resources Contact Information Advanced Scientific Computing Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-21/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-7486 F: (301) 903-4846 E: sc.ascr@science.doe.gov More Information »

122

DOE ETV-1 electric test vehicle. Phase III: performance testing and system evaluation. Final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The DOE ETV-1 represents the most advanced electric vehicle in operation today. Engineering tests have been conducted by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in order to characterize its overall system performance and component efficiencies within the system environment. A dynamometer was used in order to minimize the ambient effects and large uncertainties present in track testing. Extensive test requirements have been defined and procedures were carefully controlled in order to maintain a high degree of credibility. Limited track testing was performed in order to corroborate the dynamometer results. Test results include an energy flow analysis through the major subsystems and incorporate and aerodynamic and rolling losses under cyclic and various steady speed conditions. A complete summary of the major output from all relevant dynamometer and track tests is also included as an appendix.

Kurtz, D. W.

1981-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Development of HVAC System Performance Criteria Using Factorial Design and DOE-2 Simulation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A new approach is described for the development of Heating, Ventilating, and Air-conditioning (HVAC) System Performance Criteria for the Texas Building Energy Design Standard. This approach integrates a design of experimental methodology and DOE-2 simulation to identify the effects of control parameters on HVAC system energy performance. Three new criteria - transport, plant, and system performance factors-are used as measures of system performance. The procedure has been applied to the development of criteria for a variable-air-volume (VAV) and a constant-air-volume (CAV) system in three Texas climates. The results show that the air distribution system pressure loss, cooling coil exit temperature set-pint, operation of an economizer, and use of dead band controls have significant effects on air transport energy use and total system performance. The selection of control strategies and set-points have a clear impact on energy use. There is also a great energy-saving potential of converting from a CAV to a VAV system.

Hou, D.; Jones, J. W.; Hunn, B. D.; Banks, J. A.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

The DOE Office of Environmental Management International Collaboration Program Overview: Interactions, Agreements, and Future Direction  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As the lead U.S. agency for the environmental cleanup, the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) carries out international activities in support of U.S. policies and objectives regarding accelerated risk reduction and remediation of the environmental legacy of the nation's nuclear weapons program and government-sponsored nuclear energy research. To achieve this, EM pursues collaborations with foreign government organizations, educational institutions, and private industry to assist in identifying technologies and promote international collaborations that leverage resources and link international experience and expertise. An initiative of the International Program is to link international experience and expertise to the technical needs of the overall EM mission and to foster further collaboration with international partners to promote those needs. This paper will provide an overview of the current international program and how it plans to leverage existing, and when necessary, new international partnerships to support the overall EM cleanup mission. In addition it will examine the future vision of the international program to promote the EM mission through a focus on transformational solutions, science, and technology development.

Marra, James C.; Fox, Kevin M.; Jannik, Gerald T.; Farfan, Eduardo B.; Kim, Dong-Sang; Vienna, John D.; Roach, Jay; Aloy, A. S.; Stefanovsky, S. V.; Lopukh, D. B.; Bondarkov, M. D.; Gerdes, Kurt D.; Han, Ana M.

2010-02-10T23:59:59.000Z

125

Power Performance Testing Activities in the DOE-EPRI Turbine Verification Program  

SciTech Connect

As part of the US Department of Energy/Electric Power Research Institute (DOE-EPRI) Wind Turbine Verification Program, Global Energy Concepts (GEC) is engaged in planning and conducting power performance tests for wind turbines in Searsburg, Vermont; Glenmore, Wisconsin; Algona, Iowa; Springview, Nebraska; Kotzebue, Alaska; and Big Spring, Texas. The turbines under investigation include a 550-kW Zond Z-40 FS, a 600-kW Tacke 600e, two 750-kW Zond Z-50s, a 66-kW AOC 15/50, a 660-kW Vestas V-47, and a 1.65-MW Vestas V-66. The testing is performed in a variety of terrain types, including mountains, plains, deserts, and coastal tundra; and under a wide range of atmospheric conditions from arid to arctic. Because one goal of this testing program is to gain experience with the new International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61400-12 standard, all of the measurements are being performed in accordance with this new standard. This paper presents the status of the power performance testing at each site, the methodologies employed, test results available, and lessons learned from the application of the IEC standard. Any sources of uncertainty are discussed, and attention is given to the relative importance of each aspect of the IEC standard in terms of its contribution to the overall measurement uncertainty.

VandenBosche, J.; McCoy, T.; Rhoads, H. (Global Energy Concepts, LLC); McNiff, B. (McNiff Light Industry); Smith, B. (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

2000-09-11T23:59:59.000Z

126

Practical Experiences with the Implementation of the Energy Performance Buildings Directive in Central Europe  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

European Parliament and the council announced on 16 December 2002, the Directive 2002/91/EC (Energy Performance Building Directive, EPBD). The European countries were asked to implement the EPBD within a time period of 3 years. If the needed experts are not available, a further transition period of two more years is allowed. According to this plan, all European countries should have the EPBD implemented by end of 2008 at the latest.

Therburg, I.

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Role of directional fidelity in multiple extreme performance of F1-ATPase motor  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Quantitative understanding of the best possible performance of nanomotors allowed by physical laws pertains to study of nanomotors from biology as well as nanotechnology. Biological nanomotor F1-ATPase is the best available model system as it is the only nanomotor known for extreme energy conversion near the limit of energy conservation. Using a unified theoretical framework centred on a concept called directional fidelity, we analyze recent experiments in which F1-motor's performance was measured for controlled chemical potentials, and expose from the experiments quantitative evidence for the motor's multiple extreme performance in directional fidelity, speed and catalytic capability close to physical limits. Specifically, the motor nearly exhausts available energy from the fuel to retain the highest possible directional fidelity for arbitrary load, encompassing the motor's extreme energy conversion and beyond. The theory-experiment comparison implies a tight chemomechanical coupling up to stalemate as futil...

Hou, Ruizheng

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

Better Indoor Climate With Less Energy: European Energy Performance of Building Directive (EPBD)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The European Commission's Action Plan on Energy Efficiency (2000) indicated the need for specific measures in the building sector. In response, the European Commission (EC) published the proposed Directive on the Energy Performance of Buildings (EPBD) in May 2001. The European Parliament and Council accepted the text, and it was published in the EU Official Journal in January 2003, at which time the Directive became a European Law. The objective of the EPBD is to promote the improvement of the energy performance of buildings, taking into account outdoor climatic and local conditions, as well as indoor climate requirements. The main objective is to achieve better indoor climate with less energy.

Magyar, Z.; Leitner, A.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Work Performed Under DOE Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-03NT41779  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Gas storage is a critical element in the natural gas industry. Producers, transmission and distribution companies, marketers, and end users all benefit directly from the load balancing function of storage. The unbundling process has fundamentally changed the way storage is used and valued. As an unbundled service, the value of storage is being recovered at rates that reflect

Joel L. Morrison; Sharon L. Elder

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

Are You Ready Phase Two? Pricing Changes and Commercial Products Added to DOE High-Performance Windows Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This article, for publication in Door and Window Manufacturer magazine, describes DOE's High Performance Windows Volume Purchase Program, WVPP, and how PNNL, which manages the program for DOE, is assisting DOE in the transition to the next phase (Phase II), which begins in May. While the foundation of the program will remain relatively unchanged, PNNL is employing several new strategies to continue the momentum built during the program's first full year of implementation. The program helps buyers and manufacturers to develop a market for highly insulating windows and low-E storm windows at affordable prices and thereby overcome the principal barrier of cost.

Mapes, Terry S.

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

DOE017-0153  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5525 5525 DOE017-0153 ,-.or/ N"( - ./,'-'S MaryBeth Zimmerman 02/14/2001 11:08AM / -- T ' ,44 L - ( _w _1_'- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .I f . J To: Kenneth Friedman/EE/DOE@DOE, Peggy Podolak/EE/DOE@DOE, Linda Silverman/EE/DOE@DOE, Ed Wall/EE/DOE@DOE, David RodgerslEE/DOE@DOE, Jerry DionlEE/DOE@DOE, Gail McKinley/EE/DOE@DOE. Lawrence MansuetifEE/DOE@DOE cc: John Sullivan/EE/DOE@DOE. Darrell Beschen/EEIDOE@DOE, Michael York/EE/DOE@DOE, Buddy GarlandlEEIDOE@DOE, Nancy Jefferv/EEIDOE@DOE, Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE. Sam Baldwin/EE/DOE@DOE, IEE-ADAS Subject: FW: NEP Draft outline Directions on NEP Assessment paper. Please read all of this very carefully before proceeding: Product Schedule: * Inputs due from sectors to Planning: COB on Thursday (sorry) o Due from EERE to Policy Office: noon on Friday

132

High Performance Homes That Use 50% Less Energy Than the DOE Building America Benchmark Building  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document describes lessons learned from designing, building, and monitoring five affordable, energy-efficient test houses in a single development in the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) service area. This work was done through a collaboration of Habitat for Humanity Loudon County, the US Department of Energy (DOE), TVA, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).The houses were designed by a team led by ORNL and were constructed by Habitat's volunteers in Lenoir City, Tennessee. ZEH5, a two-story house and the last of the five test houses to be built, provided an excellent model for conducting research on affordable high-performance houses. The impressively low energy bills for this house have generated considerable interest from builders and homeowners around the country who wanted a similar home design that could be adapted to different climates. Because a design developed without the project constraints of ZEH5 would have more appeal for the mass market, plans for two houses were developed from ZEH5: a one-story design (ZEH6) and a two-story design (ZEH7). This report focuses on ZEH6, identical to ZEH5 except that the geothermal heat pump is replaced with a SEER 16 air source unit (like that used in ZEH4). The report also contains plans for the ZEH6 house. ZEH5 and ZEH6 both use 50% less energy than the DOE Building America protocol for energyefficient buildings. ZEH5 is a 4 bedroom, 2.5 bath, 2632 ft2 house with a home energy rating system (HERS) index of 43, which qualifies it for federal energy-efficiency incentives (a HERS rating of 0 is a zero-energy house, and a conventional new house would have a HERS rating of 100). This report is intended to help builders and homeowners build similar high-performance houses. Detailed specifications for the envelope and the equipment used in ZEH5 are compared with the Building America Benchmark building, and detailed drawings, specifications, and lessons learned in the construction and analysis of data gleaned from 94 sensors installed in ZEH5 to monitor electric sub-metered usage, temperature and relative humidity, hot water usage, and heat pump operation for 1 year are presented. This information should be particularly useful to those considering structural insulated panel (SIP) walls and roofing; foundation geothermal heat pumps for space heating and cooling; solar water heaters; and roof-mounted, grid-tied photovoltaic systems. The document includes plans for ZEH6 (adapted from ZEH5), a one-story, high-performance house, as well as projections of how the design might perform in five major metropolitan areas across the TVA service territory. The HERS ratings for this all-electric house vary from 36 (Memphis, Tennessee) to 46 (Bristol, Tennessee).

Christian, J.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

DOE G 413.3-5A, U.S. Department of Energy Performance Baseline Guide  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This guide identifies key PB elements, development processes, and practices; describes the context in which DOE PB development occurs; and suggests ways of ...

2011-09-23T23:59:59.000Z

134

FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

(LDRD) Technology Transfer DOE National Laboratories Contact Information Laboratory Policy and Evaluation U.S. Department of Energy SC-32Forrestal Building 1000 Independence...

135

FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

(LDRD) Technology Transfer DOE National Laboratories Contact Information Laboratory Policy and Evaluation U.S. Department of Energy SC-32Forrestal Building 1000 Independence...

136

FY 2007 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

(LDRD) Technology Transfer DOE National Laboratories Contact Information Laboratory Policy and Evaluation U.S. Department of Energy SC-32Forrestal Building 1000 Independence...

137

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record 9017: On-Board Hydrogen Storage Systems … Projected Performance and Cost Parameters  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record Record #: 9017 Date: July 02, 2010 Title: On-Board Hydrogen Storage Systems - Projected Performance and Cost Parameters Originators: Robert C. Bowman and Ned Stetson Approved by: Sunita Satyapal Date: August 10, 2010 This record summarizes the current technical assessments of hydrogen (H 2 ) storage system capacities and projected manufacturing costs for the scenario of high-volume production (i.e., 500,000 units/year) for various types of "on-board" vehicular storage systems. These analyses were performed within the Hydrogen Storage sub-program of the DOE Fuel Cell Technologies (FCT) program of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Item: It is important to note that all system capacities are "net useable capacities" able to be delivered to the

138

JGI - Directions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Map to JGI Directions from Directions from key local start points, public transit Home > About Us > Map to JGI UC logo DOE logo Contact Us Credits Disclaimer Access...

139

Performance of solid oxide fuel cells operated with coal syngas provided directly from a gasification process  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are presently being developed for gasification integrated power plants that generate electricity from coal at 50+% efficiency. The interaction of trace metals in coal syngas with the Ni-based SOFC anodes is being investigated through thermodynamic analyses and in laboratory experiments, but direct test data from coal syngas exposure are sparsely available. This research effort evaluates the significance of SOFC performance losses associated with exposure of a SOFC anode to direct coal syngas. SOFC specimen of industrially relevant composition are operated in a unique mobile test skid that was deployed to the research gasifier at the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC) in Wilsonville, AL. The mobile test skid interfaces with a gasifier slipstream to deliver hot syngas (up to 300C) directly to a parallel array of 12 button cell specimen, each of which possesses an active area of approximately 2 cm2. During the 500 hour test period, all twelve cells were monitored for performance at four discrete operating current densities, and all cells maintained contact with a data acquisition system. Of these twelve, nine demonstrated good performance throughout the test, while three of the cells were partially compromised. Degradation associated with the properly functioning cells was attributed to syngas exposure and trace material attack on the anode structure that was accelerated at increasing current densities. Cells that were operated at 0 and 125 mA/cm degraded at 9.1 and 10.7% per 1000 hours, respectively, while cells operated at 250 and 375 mA/cm degraded at 18.9 and 16.2% per 1000 hours, respectively. Post-trial spectroscopic analysis of the anodes showed carbon, sulfur, and phosphorus deposits; no secondary Ni-metal phases were found.

Hackett, Gregory A.; Gerdes, Kirk R.; Song, Xueyan; Chen, Yun; Shutthanandan, V.; Engelhard, Mark H.; Zhu, Zihua; Thevuthasan, Suntharampillai; Gemmen, Randall

2012-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

140

Direct Current Fast Charger System Characterization: Standards, Penetration Potential, Testing, and Performance Evaluation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The importance of direct current (dc) fast charging of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) is expected to grow in the near future. This report presents a brief overview of the various standards and protocols in use and in development along with a market assessment of various dc fast chargers and compatible vehicles planned. Modeling and analysis were performed to evaluate the penetration of dc fast chargers based on vehicle driving patterns, region, and charger power. A 200-V, three-phase fast charger was i...

2011-12-14T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Annual Performance Report FY 2004 Annual Performance Plan FY...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

142

Hodges residence: performance of a direct gain passive solar home in Iowa  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Results are presented for the performance of the Hodges Residence, a 2200-square-foot earth-sheltered direct gain passive solar home in Ames, Iowa, during the 1979-80 heating season, its first occupied season. No night insulation was used on its 500 square feet of double-pane glass. Total auxiliary heat required was 43 GJ (41 MBTU) gross and 26 GJ (25 MBTU) net, amounting, respectively, to 60 and 36 kJ/C/sup 0/-day-m/sup 2/ (2.9 and 1.8 BTU/F/sup 0/-day-ft/sup 2/). The heating season was unusually cloudy and included the cloudiest January in the 21 years of Ames insolation measurements. Results are also presented for the performance of the hollow-core floor which serves as the main storage mass and for the comfort range in the house.

Hodges, L.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

143

DOE Fuel Cell Technologies Office Record 13010: Onboard Type IV Compressed Hydrogen Storage Systems - Current Performance and Cost  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Fuel Cell Technologies Office Record Record #: 13010 Date: June 11, 2013 Title: Onboard Type IV Compressed Hydrogen Storage Systems - Current Performance and Cost Originators: Scott McWhorter and Grace Ordaz Approved by: Sunita Satyapal Date: July 17, 2013 Item: This record summarizes the current status of the projected capacities and manufacturing costs of Type IV, 350- and 700-bar compressed hydrogen storage systems, storing 5.6 kg of usable hydrogen, for onboard light-duty automotive applications when manufactured at a volume of 500,000 units per year. The current projected performance and cost of these systems are presented in Table 1 against the DOE Hydrogen Storage System targets. These analyses were performed in support of the Hydrogen Storage

144

Performance of solid oxide fuel cells operaated with coal syngas provided directly from a gasification process  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are being developed for integrated gasification power plants that generate electricity from coal at 50% efficiency. The interaction of trace metals in coal syngas with Ni-based SOFC anodes is being investigated through thermodynamic analyses and in laboratory experiments, but test data from direct coal syngas exposure are sparsely available. This effort evaluates the significance of performance losses associated with exposure to direct coal syngas. Specimen are operated in a unique mobile test skid that is deployed to the research gasifier at NCCC in Wilsonville, AL. The test skid interfaces with a gasifier slipstream to deliver hot syngas to a parallel array of twelve SOFCs. During the 500 h test period, all twelve cells are monitored for performance at four current densities. Degradation is attributed to syngas exposure and trace material attack on the anode structure that is accelerated at increasing current densities. Cells that are operated at 0 and 125 mA cm{sup 2} degrade at 9.1 and 10.7% per 1000 h, respectively, while cells operated at 250 and 375 mA cm{sup 2} degrade at 18.9 and 16.2% per 1000 h, respectively. Spectroscopic analysis of the anodes showed carbon, sulfur, and phosphorus deposits; no secondary Ni-metal phases were found.

Hackett, G.; Gerdes, K.; Song, X.; Chen, Y.; Shutthanandan, V.; Englehard, M.; Zhu, Z.; Thevuthasan, S.; Gemmen, R.

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

Final Report for DOE Grant DE-FG02-06ER64160 Retrieval of Cloud Properties and Direct Testing of Cloud and Radiation Parameterizations using ARM Observations.  

SciTech Connect

This report briefly summaries the work performed at KNMI under DOE Grant DE-FG02-06ER64160 which, in turn was conducted in support of DOE Grant DE-FG02-90ER61071 lead by E. Clothieux of Penn. State U. The specific work at KNMI revolved around the development and application of the EarthCARE simulator to ground-based multi-sensor simulations.

Donovan, David Patrick [KNMI

2013-07-26T23:59:59.000Z

146

FY 2006 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards 6 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2007 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2006 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Ames: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 Argonne: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 BNL: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 Fermilab: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 LBNL: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 ORNL: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 PNNL: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 PPPL: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006

147

Audit of the DOE's Commercial Laboratory Quality Assurance Evaluation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ombudsman FOIA Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work...

148

Audit Report: DOE/IG-0851 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

149

Inspection Report: DOE-IG-0882 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FOIA Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About...

150

Inspection Report: DOE/IG-0853 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FOIA Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About...

151

Data-Based Performance Assessments for the DOE Hydropower Advancement Project  

SciTech Connect

The U. S. Department of Energy s Hydropower Advancement Project (HAP) was initiated to characterize and trend hydropower asset conditions across the U.S.A. s existing hydropower fleet and to identify and evaluate the upgrading opportunities. Although HAP includes both detailed performance assessments and condition assessments of existing hydropower plants, this paper focuses on the performance assessments. Plant performance assessments provide a set of statistics and indices that characterize the historical extent to which each plant has converted the potential energy at a site into electrical energy for the power system. The performance metrics enable benchmarking and trending of performance across many projects in a variety contexts (e.g., river systems, power systems, and water availability). During FY2011 and FY2012, assessments will be performed on ten plants, with an additional fifty plants scheduled for FY2013. This paper focuses on the performance assessments completed to date, details the performance assessment process, and describes results from the performance assessments.

March, Patrick [Hydro Performance Processes, Inc.; Wolff, Dr. Paul [WolffWare Ltd.; Smith, Brennan T [ORNL; Zhang, Qin Fen [ORNL; Dham, Rajesh [U.S. Department of Energy

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards 10 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Ames: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 Argonne: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 BNL: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 Fermilab: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 LBNL: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 ORNL: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 PNNL: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 PPPL: October 1, 2009 - September 30, 2010 SLAC: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 JLab: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards

153

FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards 1 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Ames: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 Argonne: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 BNL: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 Fermilab: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 LBNL: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 ORNL: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 PNNL: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 PPPL: October 1, 2010 - September 30, 2011 SLAC: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 JLab: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards

154

FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards 3 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Ames: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 Argonne: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 BNL: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 Fermilab: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 LBNL: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 ORNL: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 PNNL: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 PPPL: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 SLAC: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 JLab: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards

155

FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards 2 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Ames: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 Argonne: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 BNL: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 Fermilab: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 LBNL: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 ORNL: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 PNNL: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 PPPL: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 SLAC: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 JLab: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards

156

DOE N 472.3, Implementation of Presidential Policy Directive 19, Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Notice implements Presidential Policy Directive 19, Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information, which was issued by President Obama ...

2013-07-10T23:59:59.000Z

157

Semi-empirical method for estimating the performance of direct gain passive solar heated buildings  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The sunspot code for performance analysis of direct gain passive solar heated buildings is used to calculate the annual solar fraction for two representative designs in ten American cities. The two representative designs involve a single thermal storage mass configuration which is evaluated with and without night insulation. In both cases the solar aperture is double glazed. The results of the detailed thermal network calculations are then correlated using the monthly solar load ratio method which has already been successfully applied to the analysis of both active solar heated buildings and passive thermal storage wall systems. The method is based on a correlation between the monthly solar heating fraction and the monthly solar load ratio. The monthly solar load ratio is defined as the ratio of the monthly solar energy transmitted through the glazing aperture to the building's monthly thermal load. The procedure using the monthly method for any location is discussed in detail. In addition, a table of annual performance results for 84 cities is presented, enabling the designer to bypass the monthly method for these locations.

Wray, W.O.; Balcomb, J.D.; McFarland, R.D.

1979-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

Direct-Steam Linear Fresnel Performance Model for NREL's System Advisor Model  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This paper presents the technical formulation and demonstrated model performance results of a new direct-steam-generation (DSG) model in NREL's System Advisor Model (SAM). The model predicts the annual electricity production of a wide range of system configurations within the DSG Linear Fresnel technology by modeling hourly performance of the plant in detail. The quasi-steady-state formulation allows users to investigate energy and mass flows, operating temperatures, and pressure drops for geometries and solar field configurations of interest. The model includes tools for heat loss calculation using either empirical polynomial heat loss curves as a function of steam temperature, ambient temperature, and wind velocity, or a detailed evacuated tube receiver heat loss model. Thermal losses are evaluated using a computationally efficient nodal approach, where the solar field and headers are discretized into multiple nodes where heat losses, thermal inertia, steam conditions (including pressure, temperature, enthalpy, etc.) are individually evaluated during each time step of the simulation. This paper discusses the mathematical formulation for the solar field model and describes how the solar field is integrated with the other subsystem models, including the power cycle and optional auxiliary fossil system. Model results are also presented to demonstrate plant behavior in the various operating modes.

Wagner, M. J.; Zhu, G.

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

DOE O 331.1C Admin Chg 2, Employee Performance Management and Recognition Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

To establish requirements and responsibilities for the performance management program for all supervisory and non-supervisory employees at grades GS-15 and ...

2010-10-15T23:59:59.000Z

160

Cost and Performance Report for the ASTD Reuse of Concrete Within DOE from D&D Projects  

SciTech Connect

This cost and performance report describes the Accelerated Site Technology Deployment project that developed the Protocol for Development of Authorized Release Limits for Concrete at U.S. DOE Sites, which identifies the steps for obtaining approval to reuse concrete from Deactivation and Decommissioning of facilities. This protocol compares the risk and cost of various disposition paths for the concrete and follows the authorized release approach described in the DOE's draft handbook, Controlling Release for Reuse or Recycle of Property Containing Residual Radioactive Material. This approach provides for the development of authorized release limits through a series of prescribed steps before approval for release is granted. A case study was also completed on a previously decommissioned facility.

Kamboj, S.; Arnish, J.; Chen, S. Y.; Phillips, Ann Marie; Meservey, Richard Harlan; Tripp, Julia Lynn

2000-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Services Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Energy Savings Contracts (Utility Energy Savings Contracts [UESCs] and Energy Savings Performance Contracts [ESPCs]) allow federal agencies to accomplish energy projects for their facilities without depending on special appropriations to pay for the improvements. The contractor conducts

162

DOE Site HSPD-12 Card Issuance Performance Measures 10-8-10.xls  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Field Field Sub-Total Savannah River Operations Office / SRS Oak Ridge - ETTP Idaho Operations Office / INL Richland Operations Office / Office of River Protection / Hanford Site Strategic Petroleum Reserve Office / SPR Site National Energy Technology Laboratory Golden Field Office National Renewable Energy Laboratory EMCBC Carlsbad Field Office / Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Portsmouth / Paducah DOE Naval Petroleum Reserves LM - Grand Junction / Ohio / Morgantown / Rocky Flats % of Target Sponsored 98% 99% 100% 96% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 98% 0% 100% % of Target Enrolled 94% 98% 94% 88% 99% 93% 99% 100% 0% 97% 99% 90% 0% 100% % of Target Delivered 90% 97% 93% 80% 89% 89% 98% 100% 0% 97% 91% 90% 0% 96% % of Target Activated 88% 96% 89% 76% 87% 87% 98% 100% 0% 96% 90% 86% 0% 92% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% HSPD-12 Card Issuance -

163

From Gasoline to Grassoline: Microbes Produce Fuels Directly from Biomass | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

From Gasoline to Grassoline: Microbes Produce Fuels Directly from Biomass From Gasoline to Grassoline: Microbes Produce Fuels Directly from Biomass Stories of Discovery & Innovation From Gasoline to Grassoline: Microbes Produce Fuels Directly from Biomass Enlarge Photo Image by Eric Steen, JBEI Once E. coli have secreted oil, they sequester themselves from the droplets as shown by this optical image, thereby facilitating oil recovery. Currently, biochemical processing of cellulosic biomass requires costly enzymes for sugar liberation. By giving the E. coli the capacity to ferment both cellulose and hemicellulose without the 03.28.11 From Gasoline to Grassoline: Microbes Produce Fuels Directly from Biomass A microbe that can produce an advanced biofuel directly from biomass was developed by researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy's Joint BioEnergy

164

Analytical performance of direct-hydrogen-fueled polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) systems for transportation applications.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The performance of a stand-alone polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) system directly fueled by hydrogen has been evaluated for transportation vehicles. The study was carried out using a systems analysis code and a vehicle analysis code. The systems code includes models for the various PEFC components and is applicable for steady-state and transient situations. At the design point the system efficiency is above 50% for a 50-kW system. The efficiency improves under partial load and approaches 60% at 40% load, as the fuel cell operating point moves to lower current densities on the V-I polarization curve. At much lower loads, the system efficiency drops because of the deterioration in the performance of the compressor, expander, and eventually the fuel cell. The system performance suffers at lower temperatures, as the V-I characteristic curve for the fuel cell shifts downward because of the increased ohmic losses. The results of the transient analysis indicate that the hydrogen-fueled PEFC system can start rather rapidly, within seconds from ambient conditions. However, the warm-up time constant to reach the design operating temperatures is about 180 s. It is important during this period for the coolant to bypass the system radiator until the coolant temperature approaches the design temperature for the fuel cell. The systems analysis code has been applied to two mid-size vehicles: the near-term Ford AIV Sable and the future P2000 vehicle. The results of this study show that the PEFC system in these vehicles can respond well to the demands of the FUDS and Highway driving cycles, with both warm and cold starting conditions. The results also show that the fuel-cell AIV Sable vehicle has impressive gains in fuel economy over that of the internal combustion engine vehicle. However, this vehicle will not be able to meet the PNGV goal of 80 mpg. On the other hand, the P2000 vehicle approaches this goal with variable efficiency of the compressor and expander. It is expected to exceed that goal by a big margin, if the efficiency of the compressor and expander can be maintained constant (at 0.8) over the power range of the fuel cell system.

Doss, E. D.

1998-06-02T23:59:59.000Z

165

Fair Share on High Performance Computing Systems: What Does Fair Really Mean?  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We report on a performance evaluation of a Fair Sharesystem at the ASCI Blue Mountain supercomputer cluster.We study the impacts of share allocation under Fair Shareon wait times and expansion factor. We also measure theService Ratio, a typical figure ...

Stephen D. Kleban; Scott H. Clearwater

2003-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

166

FROM: STEPHEN M. SMITH, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATIONS, ME-43 TO: DIRECTIVES POINTS OF CONTACT SUBJECT: DRAFT DOE G 430.1-1X, DOE Cost Estimating Guidefor Program  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This is to notify you that the subject draft Guide has been posted in the Draft section of the DOE Directives Portal system for simultaneous use and coordination. The purpose of this Guide is to provide uniform guidance and best practices that describe the methods and procedures used in all programs and projects at DOE for preparing cost estimates. Comments in the Guide are due June 15, 2004. Comments on Guides should not be designated major or suggested, they should be simply labeled as comments. Because Guides provide nonmandatory, supplemental information about acceptable methods for implementing requirements, comments supplied will be considered advisory in nature The following procedures should be followed for the submission of comments:

unknown authors

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

JGI - Directions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directions Address DOE Joint Genome Institute 2800 Mitchell Drive Walnut Creek, CA 94598 From Oakland Airport Follow Airport exit signs onto AIRPORT DR. Turn RIGHT onto HEGENBERGER...

168

E AREA LOW LEVEL WASTE FACILITY DOE 435.1 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Performance Assessment for the Savannah River Site E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility was prepared to meet requirements of Chapter IV of the Department of Energy Order 435.1-1. The Order specifies that a Performance Assessment should provide reasonable assurance that a low-level waste disposal facility will comply with the performance objectives of the Order. The Order also requires assessments of impacts to water resources and to hypothetical inadvertent intruders for purposes of establishing limits on radionuclides that may be disposed near-surface. According to the Order, calculations of potential doses and releases from the facility should address a 1,000-year period after facility closure. The point of compliance for the performance measures relevant to the all pathways and air pathway performance objective, as well as to the impact on water resources assessment requirement, must correspond to the point of highest projected dose or concentration beyond a 100-m buffer zone surrounding the disposed waste following the assumed end of active institutional controls 100 years after facility closure. During the operational and institutional control periods, the point of compliance for the all pathways and air pathway performance measures is the SRS boundary. However, for the water resources impact assessment, the point of compliance remains the point of highest projected dose or concentration beyond a 100-m buffer zone surrounding the disposed waste during the operational and institutional control periods. For performance measures relevant to radon and inadvertent intruders, the points of compliance are the disposal facility surface for all time periods and the disposal facility after the assumed loss of active institutional controls 100 years after facility closure, respectively. The E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility is located in the central region of the SRS known as the General Separations Area. It is an elbow-shaped, cleared area, which curves to the northwest, situated immediately north of the Mixed Waste Management Facility. The E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility is comprised of 200 acres for waste disposal and a surrounding buffer zone that extends out to the 100-m point of compliance. Disposal units within the footprint of the low-level waste facilities include the Slit Trenches, Engineered Trenches, Component-in-Grout Trenches, the Low-Activity Waste Vault, the Intermediate-Level Vault, and the Naval Reactor Component Disposal Area. Radiological waste disposal operations at the E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility began in 1994. E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility closure will be conducted in three phases: operational closure, interim closure, and final closure. Operational closure will be conducted during the 25-year operation period (30-year period for Slit and Engineered Trenches) as disposal units are filled; interim closure measures will be taken for some units. Interim closure will take place following the end of operations and will consist of an area-wide runoff cover along with additional grading over the trench units. Final closure of all disposal units in the E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility will take place at the end of the 100-year institutional control period and will consist of the installation of an integrated closure system designed to minimize moisture contact with the waste and to serve as a deterrent to intruders. Radiological dose to human receptors is analyzed in this PA in the all-pathways analysis, the inadvertent intruder analysis and the air pathway analysis, and the results are compared to the relevant performance measures. For the all-pathways analysis, the performance measure of relevance is a 25-mrem/yr EDE to representative members of the public, excluding dose from radon and its progeny in air. For the inadvertent intruder, the applicable performance measures are 100-mrem/yr EDE and 500 mrem/yr EDE for chronic and exposure scenarios, respectively. The relevant performance measure for the air pathway is 10-mrem/yr EDE via the air pathway, excluding dose from radon and its progeny in air. Protecti

Wilhite, E

2008-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

169

Status of Art & Practice of Performance Assessment within the DOE Complex  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- - Status of Art and Practice Roger R. Seitz Advisory Scientist 05 March 2009 Phoenix, Arizona USA High-Level Waste Corporate Board SRNL-MS-2009-00036 2 High-Level Waste Corporate Board - March 5, 2009 Background Performance (Safety) Assessment Process has a long history of successful use around the world Relatively good agreement about fundamental process, technical approaches continually evolving Essential blend of regulatory and science and engineering Managing uncertainties associated with complex systems over long time frames is primary challenge Emphasize iterative process rather than calculations 1. Assessment context 2. Describe system 3. Develop and justify scenarios 4. Formulate and implement models 5. Run analyses 7. Compare

170

PROJECT HANFORD MANAGEMENT CONTRACT COSTSAND PERFORMANCE, IG...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

171

Un Nio Puede Agarrar un Perro: Childrens Use and Uptake of Directives in the Context of Play and Performance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Edgar: Childrens Directives in Play and Performance 47 SoThere okay? Childrens Directives in Play and Performanceyou dont snore please? Directives in young childrens role-

Bhimji, Fazila

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

172

Report on Performance of Prototype Dynatronix Power Supplies Developed Under a Phase I DOE SBIR  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prototype power supplies fabricated by Dynatronix, Inc. This project supports the advancement of electroforming capabilities to produce ultra-high purity copper. Ultra-high purity copper is an essential material used for a range of current and future fundamental nuclear physics programs such as the MAJORANA DEMONSTRATOR. The Mach 30 power supplies are a new design built to the specifications from the requirements of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) with regard to timing, voltage, current output, and the required tolerances. The parameters used in these tests were developed empirically over a number of years based on a combination of thermodynamic and kinetics of the electroplating process. The power supplies were operated in a typical cleanroom environment for the production electroforming at PNNL. The units that were received by PNNL in July, 2010 have performed satisfactorily and have demonstrated short term durability.

Hoppe, Eric W.; Merriman, Jason H.

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

DOE Online  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fermilab's Science Adventures! Fermilab's Science Adventures! DOE Online K-12 Instructional Resources ed.fnal.gov/doe/ The U.S. Department of Energy is committed to helping educate our nation's next generation of scientists. The following resources help teachers integrate the Internet into K-12 classroom instruction. DOE Labs General Instructional Units Online Resources Lesson Plans General References DOE Laboratory and Facility Education Home Pages (www-ed.fnal.gov/doe/doe_labs.html) Direct links for 27 education Websites at DOE national laboratories and facilities. Online Catalog (www-ed.fnal.gov/trc/library) Fermilab's Teacher Resource Center collection of 10,000+ PreK-12 instructional materials in science, mathematics and technology. Materials include tradebooks, curriculum materials, educational

174

Proceedings of the ASHRAE/DOE/BTECC Conference, Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Buildings VII, Clearwater Beach, Florida, December 7-11, 1998  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LBNL-41694 BS-384 Proceedings of the ASHRAE/DOE/BTECC Conference, Thermal Performance. Sullivan L. Beltran E.S. Lee M. Rubin, Ph.D. S. E. Selkowitz Member ASHRAE ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Research

175

US-DOE Fusion-Breeder Program: blanket design and system performance  

SciTech Connect

Conceptual design studies are being used to assess the technical and economic feasibility of fusion's potential to produce fissile fuel. A reference design of a fission-suppressed blanket using conventional materials is under development. Theoretically, a fusion breeder that incorporates this fusion-suppressed blanket surrounding a 3000-MW tandem mirror fusion core produces its own tritium plus 5600 kg of /sup 233/U per year. The /sup 233/U could then provide fissile makeup for 21 GWe of light-water reactor (LWR) power using a denatured thorium fuel cycle with full recycle. This is 16 times the net electric power produced by the fusion breeder (1.3 GWe). The cost of electricity from this fusion-fission system is estimated to be only 23% higher than the cost from LWRs that have makeup from U/sub 3/O/sub 8/ at present costs (55 $/kg). Nuclear performance, magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), radiation effects, and other issues concerning the fission-suppressed blanket are summarized, as are some of the present and future objectives of the fusion breeder program.

Lee, J.D.

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

NEUTRON MULTIPLICITY AND ACTIVE WELL NEUTRON COINCIDENCE VERIFICATION MEASUREMENTS PERFORMED FOR MARCH 2009 SEMI-ANNUAL DOE INVENTORY  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Analytical Development (AD) Section field nuclear measurement group performed six 'best available technique' verification measurements to satisfy a DOE requirement instituted for the March 2009 semi-annual inventory. The requirement of (1) yielded the need for SRNL Research Operations Department Material Control & Accountability (MC&A) group to measure the Pu content of five items and the highly enrich uranium (HEU) content of two. No 14Q-qualified measurement equipment was available to satisfy the requirement. The AD field nuclear group has routinely performed the required Confirmatory Measurements for the semi-annual inventories for fifteen years using sodium iodide and high purity germanium (HpGe) {gamma}-ray pulse height analysis nondestructive assay (NDA) instruments. With appropriate {gamma}-ray acquisition modeling, the HpGe spectrometers can be used to perform verification-type quantitative assay for Pu-isotopics and HEU content. The AD nuclear NDA group is widely experienced with this type of measurement and reports content for these species in requested process control, MC&A booking, and holdup measurements assays Site-wide. However none of the AD HpGe {gamma}-ray spectrometers have been 14Q-qualified, and the requirement of reference 1 specifically excluded a {gamma}-ray PHA measurement from those it would accept for the required verification measurements. The requirement of reference 1 was a new requirement for which the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) Research Operations Department (ROD) MC&A group was unprepared. The criteria for exemption from verification were: (1) isotope content below 50 grams; (2) intrinsically tamper indicating or TID sealed items which contain a Category IV quantity of material; (3) assembled components; and (4) laboratory samples. Therefore all (SRNL) Material Balance Area (MBA) items with greater than 50 grams total Pu or greater than 50 grams HEU were subject to a verification measurement. The pass/fail criteria of reference 7 stated 'The facility will report measured values, book values, and statistical control limits for the selected items to DOE SR...', and 'The site/facility operator must develop, document, and maintain measurement methods for all nuclear material on inventory'. These new requirements exceeded SRNL's experience with prior semi-annual inventory expectations, but allowed the AD nuclear field measurement group to demonstrate its excellent adaptability and superior flexibility to respond to unpredicted expectations from the DOE customer. The requirements yielded five SRNL items subject to Pu verification and two SRNL items subject to HEU verification. These items are listed and described in Table 1.

Dewberry, R.; Ayers, J.; Tietze, F.; Klapper, K.

2010-02-05T23:59:59.000Z

177

Hanford Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) Performance Assessment 2001 Version [Formerly DOE/RL-97-69] [SEC 1 & 2  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Performance Assessment examines the long-term environmental and human health effects associated with the planned disposal of the vitrified low-activity fraction of waste presently contained in Hanford Site tanks. The tank waste is the byproduct of separating special nuclear materials from irradiated nuclear fuels over the past 50 years. This waste is stored in underground single- and double-shell tanks. The tank waste is to be retrieved, separated into low-activity and high-level fractions, and then immobilized by vitrification. The US. Department of Energy (DOE) plans to dispose of the low-activity fraction in the Hanford Site 200 East Area. The high-level fraction will be stored at the Hanford Site until a national repository is approved. This report provides the site-specific long-term environmental information needed by the DOE to modify the current Disposal Authorization Statement for the Hanford Site that would allow the following: construction of disposal trenches; and filling of these trenches with ILAW containers and filler material with the intent to dispose of the containers.

MANN, F.M.

2000-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

178

Performance Calculations and Optimization of a Fresnel Direct Steam Generation CSP Plant with Heat Storage.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

?? This master thesis deals with the performance calculations of a 9MW linear Fresnel CSP plant withdirect steam generation built by the Solar Division of (more)

Schlaifer, Perrine

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

179

Human Performance Management and Optimization: Strategic R&D Directions for Human-Centered Technologies, Tools, and Methods  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report applies a human-centered filter to identify crosscutting strategic research and development (R&D) directions for improving workforce productivity and reliability throughout the energy sector, enhancing the performance and capabilities of the energy infrastructure, and maximizing the benefits of electrification to society.

2002-06-28T23:59:59.000Z

180

Radiochemistry Student, Postdoc and Invited Speaker Support for New Directions in Isotope Production, Nuclear Forensics and Radiochemistry Supported by the DOE  

SciTech Connect

The Division of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology (NUCL) of the American Chemistry Society (ACS) is sponsoring a symposium entitled "New Directions in Isotope Production, Nuclear Forensics and Radiochemistry Supported by the DOE" at the 240th ACS National Meeting in Boston, MA 22-26 August 2010. Radiochemistry and nuclear science is a critical area of research and funding for which the DOE has provided support over the years. Radiochemistry is undergoing a renaissance in interdisciplinary areas including medicine, materials, nanotechnology, nuclear forensics and energy. For example, interest in nuclear energy is growing in response to global warming. The field of nuclear forensics has grown significantly since 9/11 in response to potential terror threats and homeland security. Radioactive molecular imaging agents and targeted radiotherapy are revolutionizing molecular medicine. The need for radiochemists is growing, critical, and global. The NUCL Division of the ACS has been involved in various areas of radiochemistry and nuclear chemistry for many years, and is the host of the DOE supported Nuclear Chemistry Summer Schools. This Symposium is dedicated to three of the critical areas of nuclear science, namely isotope production, nuclear forensics and radiochemistry. An important facet of this meeting is to provide support for young radiochemistry students/postdoctoral fellows to attend this Symposium as participants and contributors. The funding requested from DOE in this application will be used to provide bursaries for U.S. students/postdoctoral fellows to enable them to participate in this symposium at the 240th ACS National Meeting, and for invited scientists to speak on the important issues in these areas.

Jurisson, Silvia, S.

2011-04-11T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Simulation-based Performance Analysis and Tuning for a Two-level Directly Connected System  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Hardware and software co-design is becoming increasingly important due to complexities in supercomputing architectures. Simulating applications before there is access to the real hardware can assist machine architects in making better design decisions that can optimize application performance. At the same time, the application and runtime can be optimized and tuned beforehand. BigSim is a simulation-based performance prediction framework designed for these purposes. It can be used to perform packet-level network simulations of parallel applications using existing parallel machines. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of BigSim in analyzing and optimizing parallel application performance for future systems based on the PERCS network. We present simulation studies using benchmarks and real applications expected to run on future supercomputers. Future petascale systems will have more than 100,000 cores, and we present simulations at that scale.

Totoni, E; Bhatele, A; Bohm, E J; Jain, N; Mendes, C L; Mokos, R M; Zheng, G; Kale, L V

2011-09-19T23:59:59.000Z

182

Influence of water injection on performance and emissions of a direct-injection hydrogen research engine.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The application of hydrogen (H{sub 2}) as an internal combustion (IC) engine fuel has been under investigation for several decades. The favorable physical properties of hydrogen make it an excellent alternative fuel for IC engines and hence it is widely regarded as the energy carrier of the future. Direct injection of hydrogen allows optimizing this potential as it provides multiple degrees of freedom to influence the in-cylinder combustion processes and consequently engine efficiency and exhaust emissions.

Nande, A. M.; Wallner, T.; Naber, J. (Energy Systems); (MIchigan Technological Univ.)

2008-10-06T23:59:59.000Z

183

DOE O 484.1 Admin Chg 1, Reimbursable Work for the Department of Homeland Security  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Order establishes DOE policies and procedures for the acceptance, performance, and administration of reimbursable work directly funded by the Department of ...

2006-08-17T23:59:59.000Z

184

DOE OIG Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2003-2008 | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

185

Performance calculations and research direction for a water enhanced regenerative gas turbine cycle  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A cycle has been conceived that combines compressor cooling, humidification, and regenerative air heating with the added enhancement of direct injection of water into the air flow. In this cycle it is proposed that a fine mist of water be injected into the compressor air stream and a spray or film of water into the regenerator air stream. Water injection into the compressor air flow realizes several benefits: it cools the air flow, reducing the power required for compression and increasing the potential for exhaust heat recovery; it adds mass to the air stream, increasing the power produced by expansion; and it reduces the amount of cooling bleed air required by increasing the specific heat and decreasing the temperature of the cooling air stream. The greatest benefit would be derived from spraying a fine mist of water directly into the existing air flow into or before the compressor so that cooling and compression would occur simultaneously. This may be accomplished by entraining the water droplets in the inlet air flow or by introducing the water in stages during compression. An alternative and less technically challenging approach is to extract the air stream to a saturation chamber and then reintroduce the air stream into the compressor. This approach is not as desirable because it would increase the equipment cost and add a significant pressure drop penalty. The second use of water in this cycle is in water-assisted regeneration.

Rogers, L.H. [USDOE Morgantown Energy Technology Center, WV (United States); Archer, D.H. [Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States)

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

SQA Directives and Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SQA Directives and Guidance SQA Directives and Guidance SQA Directives and Guidance DOE O 414.1D, Quality Assurance DOE G 414.1-4, Software Guide for use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance DOE Order O 414.1D, Quality Assurance, includes Attachment 4 addressing SQA requirements for nuclear safety applications at DOE nuclear facilities. The DOE O 414.1D was issued April 25, 2011. This Order and its associated Guide for safety software, DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements. The Order identifies 10 software quality work activities that are to be performed using the graded approach specified in the Order. These 10 work activities are: (1) software project management, (2) software risk

187

High Performance, Low Cost Hydrogen Generation from Renewable Energy - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Dr. Katherine Ayers (Primary Contact), Andy Roemer Proton Energy Systems d/b/a Proton OnSite 10 Technology Drive Wallingford, CT 06492 Phone: (203) 678-2190 Email: kayers@protononsite.com DOE Managers HQ: Erika Sutherland Phone: (202) 586-3152 Email: Erika.Sutherland@ee.doe.gov GO: Dave Peterson Phone: (720) 356-1747 Email: David.Peterson@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE000276 Subcontractors: * Entegris, Inc., Chaska, MN * The Electrochemical Engine Center at Penn State, University Park, PA * Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN Project Start Date: September 1, 2009

188

Department of Energy (DOE) Work For Others (WFO) Information Distribution Policies October 4, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.1C, Paragraph 4: REQUIREMENTS. It is Departmental policy that DOE/NNSA resources are made available to non-DOE/non- NNSA entities. Requirements of DOE/NNSA directives, applicable regulations, and the following requirements must be satisfied before work is performed. a. In operating DOE/NNSA Federally Funded

189

Office of Inspector General Annual Performance Plan 2012 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

190

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Annual Performance Results and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

191

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Annual Performance Results and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FOIA Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About...

192

DOE Order on Quality Assurance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INITIATED BY: INITIATED BY: www.directives.doe.gov Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 4-25-2011 SUBJECT: QUALITY ASSURANCE 1. PURPOSE. a. To ensure that Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), products and services meet or exceed customers' requirements and expectations. b. To achieve quality for all work based upon the following principles: (1) All work, as defined in this Order, is conducted through an integrated and effective management system; (2) Management support for planning, organization, resources, direction, and control is essential to quality assurance (QA); (3) Performance and quality improvement require thorough, rigorous

193

DOE Solar Decathlon: Directions & Transportation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

it into the event parking lot. Screen reader users: click here for plain HTML Go to Google Maps Home Orange County Great Park, Irvine, CA Loading... Map Sat Ter Did you mean a...

194

ANNUAL HEATING AND COOLING REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN DAY PERFORMANCE FOR A RESIDENTIAL MODEL IN SIX CLIMATES: A COMPARISON OF NBSLD, BLAST 2, AND DOE-2.1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DOE-2 (SWF)3 DOE-2 (I ') 3 . PHOENIX NBSLD BLAST DOE-2 (S~JF) 3 DOE-2 (CWF)3TAMPA NBSLD BLAST DOE-2 DOE-2 (I Feb YJ.8.r o. o. o. o. O.

Carroll, William L.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

LFRG DOE Order 435.1 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LFRG DOE Order 435.1 LFRG DOE Order 435.1 LFRG DOE Order 435.1 Chapter 4 of the DOE Manual on Order 435.1, Low-level Waste Requirements, addresses the procedures whereby Department of Energy LLW Disposal Facilities will operated and maintained. Section P and Section Q describe the Performance Assessment and Composite Analysis documents that each DOE disposal facility will submit to the LFRG. To view the entire DOE Order, Manual, and Implementation Guidance documents, choose the link below to get to the main DOE Directives portal and follow the search requirements. DOE Directives, Regulations, and Standards Portal Note - For DOE O 435.1 Chg 1 (08-28-01), please use the above link and follow the search option to locate this document. P. Disposal. Low-level waste disposal facilities shall meet the following

196

DOE O 130.1, Budget Formulation  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

DOE N 251.45, dated 5/29/02, extends this directive until 5/1/03. Cancels DOE 5100.3, DOE 5100.4, DOE 5100.5, DOE 5100.6A.

1995-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

197

Does Management Matter? Evidence from India  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DOES MANAGEMENT MATTER? EVIDENCE FROM INDIA Nicholas Bloombadly managed? Our experiment does not directly answer thisworks, imagine a plant that does not record quality defects.

Bloom, Nicholas; Eifert, Benn; Mahajan, Aprajit; McKenzie, David; Roberts, John

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

198

DOE HANDBOOK  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Handbook on Overseas Assignments Handbook on Overseas Assignments United States Department of Energy Office of Human Capital Management July 2013 2 Introduction This handbook covers all types of Federal employment overseas, including details, both within DOE as well as to other agencies; transfers to approved international organizations; assignments to permanent DOE positions; cost-free experts; and personal services agreements (PSAs). This handbook contains information, guidance, sample service agreements, and related documentation that are to be used to implement the following directives: a. Executive Order 11552, Providing for Details and Transfers of Federal Employees to International Organizations at http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/11552.html;

199

DOE Policies | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Policies DOE Policies DOE Policies Cyber Security DOE O 205.1B Department of Energy Cyber Security Management (Approved May 16, 2011) Information Management Planning DOE Guide to IT Capital Planning and Investment, September 2010 (pdf) DOE IRM Strategic Plan, FY 2009 - 2011 (pdf) DOE N 203.1, Software Quality Assurance (pdf) DOE G 242.1-1, Forms Management Guide (pdf) DOE O 203.1 Limited Personal Use of Government Office Equipment Including Information Technology (pdf) Information Management Program Order, DOE O 200.1A (pdf) (Access to this document is restricted to DOE employees only) Records Management DOE Directive, O 243.1, Records Management Program (pdf) DOE Directive, O 243.2, Vital Records (pdf) DOE Directive, O 200.2, Information Collection Management Program

200

Laboratory Report on Performance Evaluation of Key Constituents during Pre-Treatment of High Level Waste Direct Feed  

SciTech Connect

The analytical capabilities of the 222-S Laboratory are tested against the requirements for an optional start up scenario of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant on the Hanford Site. In this case, washed and in-tank leached sludge would be sent directly to the High Level Melter, bypassing Pretreatment. The sludge samples would need to be analyzed for certain key constituents in terms identifying melter-related issues and adjustment needs. The analyses on original tank waste as well as on washed and leached material were performed using five sludge samples from tanks 241-AY-102, 241-AZ-102, 241-AN-106, 241-AW-105, and 241-SY-102. Additionally, solid phase characterization was applied to determine the changes in mineralogy throughout the pre-treatment steps.

Huber, Heinz J.

2013-06-24T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

The FESAC Subcommittee formed to address the DOE Office of Science charge on proposed scientific user facilities invites community input in the form of short, directed white papers. The  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

user facilities invites community input in the form of short, directed white papers. The instructions for composing these white papers are given below. The final report for this charge must be delivered to DOE the DUE DATE FOR WHITE PAPERS IS THURSDAY, FEB 14. Documents pertaining to this call for white papers

202

On the performance of a direct parallel method for solving separable elliptic equations based on block cyclic reduction  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Keywords: block cyclic reduction, direct method, parallel computing, partial fractions, separable elliptic

Kevin Kelleher; S. Lakshmivarahan; Sudarshan Dhall

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

Performance and Economics of Catalytic Glow Plugs and Shields in Direct Injection Natural Gas Engines for the Next Generation Natural Gas Vehicle Program: Final Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Subcontractor report details work done by TIAX and Westport to test and perform cost analysis for catalytic glow plugs and shields for direct-injection natural gas engines for the Next Generation Natural Gas Vehicle Program.

Mello, J. P.; Bezaire, D.; Sriramulu, S.; Weber, R.

2003-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

DOE Competencies | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Competencies DOE Competencies DOE Competencies Definition of a Competency Office of Personnel Management (OPM) defines a competency as a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that are needed to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully. Competencies are developed, attained, and sustained through training, rotational and developmental assignments, experience (both professional and personal), education, and self development. Attainment of a certain level of competency is assed based on demonstrated abilities to apply the competency in different situations and/or circumstances. Attainment is based not just on performance in a role over time, nor is it necessarily directly tied to grade. Competencies are the personal and professional attributes that are critical

205

DOE O 412.1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

All Departmental Elements Office of Field Management U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. SUBJECT: WORK AUTHORIZATION SYSTEM 1. OBJECTIVES. To establish a work authorization and control process for work performed by designated management and operating (M&O), management and integrating (M&I), environmental restoration management contracts (ERMC) and other contracts determined by the Procurement Executive (hereafter referred to as M&O contractors). 2. CANCELLATION. DOE 5700.7C, WORK AUTHORIZATION SYSTEM, dated 5-18- 92. Cancellation of a directive does not, by itself, modify or otherwise affect any contractual obligation to comply with such a directive. Canceled directives that are incorporated by reference in a contract remain in effect until the contract is modified to

206

Effects of piston surface treatments on performance and emissions of a methanol-fueled, direct injection, stratified charge engine  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of thermal barrier coatings and/or surface treatments on the performance and emissions of a methanol-fueled, direct-injection, stratified-charge (DISC) engine. A Ricardo Hydra Mark III engine was used for this work and in previous experiments at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The primary focus of the study was to examine the effects of various piston insert surface treatments on hydrocarbon (HC) and oxides of nitrogen (NO{sub x}) emissions. Previous studies have shown that engines of this class have a tendency to perform poorly at low loads and have high unburned fuel emissions. A blank aluminum piston was modified to employ removable piston bowl inserts. Four different inserts were tested in the experiment: aluminum, stainless steel with a 1.27-mm (0.050-in.) air gap (to act as a thermal barrier), and two stainless steel/air-gap inserts with coatings. Two stainless steel inserts were dimensionally modified to account for the coating thickness (1.27-mm) and coated identically with partially stabilized zirconia (PSZ). One of the coated inserts then had an additional seal-coat applied. The coated inserts were otherwise identical to the stainless steel/air-gap insert (i.e., they employed the same 1.27-mm air gap). Thermal barrier coatings were employed in an attempt to increase combustion chamber surface temperatures, thereby reducing wall quenching and promoting more complete combustion of the fuel in the quench zone. The seal-coat was applied to the zirconia to reduce the surface porosity; previous research suggested that despite the possibly higher surface temperatures obtainable with a ceramic coating, the high surface area of a plasma-sprayed coating may actually allow fuel to adhere to the surface and increase the unburned fuel emissions and fuel consumption.

West, B.; Green, J.B. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

207

Preliminary report on the baseline thermal and hydraulic performance tests of a sieve tray direct contact heat exchanger  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A sieve tray direct contact heat exchanger was designed, built and then tested in a binary power cycle at the Raft River geothermal test site. A series of baseline thermal and hydraulic tests were conducted with an isobutane working fluid. The evaluation of these tests is reported. The testing of the DCHX confirmed that the repeated forming and coalescence of the working fluid drops in the sieve tray column produce excellent heat transfer performance. Tray thermal efficiencies were at or above the design value of 70% and the pinch points were well under the design goal of 1/sup 0/F (too small to be measured with installed instrumentation). From a hydraulic standpoint, the column operated at the working fluid velocities from the plate holes corresponding to the predicted condition of maximum total drop surface area (or minimum drop size) when the unit was operating near the flooding limits, or throughputs. This is the recommended working fluid hole velocity for use in designing sieve tray columns. The geothermal flow limits encountered (at flooding) corresponded roughly to the thermal rise velocity of a 1/32-inch drop. This is a drop size commonly used for specifying the terminal velocity (or continuous fluid velocity) in the design of columns for mass transfer applications.

Mines, G.L.

1982-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

First Name Last Name Title Company Email David Alman Director-Material Performance Division National Energy Technology Laboratory david.alman@netl.doe.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technologies Collaborative National Conference - June 10, 2013 - Attendees Technologies Collaborative National Conference - June 10, 2013 - Attendees First Name Last Name Title Company Email David Alman Director-Material Performance Division National Energy Technology Laboratory david.alman@netl.doe.gov Tim Avampato Program Manager Eaton timjavampato@eaton.com Sharon Beermann-Curtin Program Officer Office of Naval Research sharon.beermanncurti@navy.mil Seth Blumsack Associate Professor Pennsylvania State University sab51@psu.edu Phil Bolin Chief Engineer Power Systems Group Mitsubishi Electric Power Products, Inc. phil.bolin@meppi.com Dushan Boroyevich Professor. Co-Director Virginia Tech - CPES mhawthor@vt.edu Steve Bossart Senior Analyst National Energy Technology Laboratory steven.bossart@netl.doe.gov Gary Bowers Commercial-Industrial Director S&C Electric Company gary.bowers@sandc.com

209

DOE Guidance on the Elements Necessary to Qualify as an Energy Conservation Measure under an Energy Savings Performance Contract  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance on the Elements Necessary to Qualify as an Energy Guidance on the Elements Necessary to Qualify as an Energy Conservation Measure under an Energy Savings Performance Contract August 2013 This document provides guidance on the statutory definition of "energy conservation measure" (ECM) for the purpose of an energy savings performance contract (ESPC), including clarification that multiple ECMs under the same ESPC may be "bundled" when evaluating lifecycle cost-effectiveness. Additionally, this document clarifies that an ESPC may include, or be limited to, a single ECM applied across multiple Federal buildings and facilities. Background and Introduction The term "energy savings performance contract," as defined by statute, means: [A] contract for the performance of services for the design, acquisition, installation, testing,

210

DOE Guidance on the Elements Necessary to Qualify as an Energy Conservation Measure under an Energy Savings Performance Contract  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance on the Elements Necessary to Qualify as an Energy Guidance on the Elements Necessary to Qualify as an Energy Conservation Measure under an Energy Savings Performance Contract August 2013 This document provides guidance on the statutory definition of "energy conservation measure" (ECM) for the purpose of an energy savings performance contract (ESPC), including clarification that multiple ECMs under the same ESPC may be "bundled" when evaluating lifecycle cost-effectiveness. Additionally, this document clarifies that an ESPC may include, or be limited to, a single ECM applied across multiple Federal buildings and facilities. Background and Introduction The term "energy savings performance contract," as defined by statute, means: [A] contract for the performance of services for the design, acquisition, installation, testing,

211

2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Review PresentationCOST AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENTS FOR A PEM FUEL CELL TURBOCOMPRESSOR  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The objectives of the program during the past year was to complete Technical Objectives 2 and 3 and initiate Technical Objective 4 are described. To assist the Department of Energy in the development of a low cost, reliable and high performance air compressor/expander. Technical Objective 1: Perform a turbocompressor systems PEM fuel cell trade study to determine the enhanced turbocompressor approach. Technical Objective 2: Using the results from technical objective 1, an enhanced turbocompressor will be fabricated. The design may be modified to match the flow requirements of a selected fuel cell system developer. Technical Objective 3: Design a cost and performance enhanced compact motor and motor controller. Technical Objective 4: Turbocompressor/motor controller development.

Mark K. Gee

2005-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

212

Proceedings of the tenth annual DOE low-level waste management conference: Session 2: Site performance assessment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document contains twelve papers on various aspects of low-level radioactive waste management. Topics of this volume include: performance assessment methodology; remedial action alternatives; site selection and site characterization procedures; intruder scenarios; sensitivity analysis procedures; mathematical models for mixed waste environmental transport; and risk assessment methodology. Individual papers were processed separately for the database. (TEM)

Not Available

1988-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

ANNUAL HEATING AND COOLING REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN DAY PERFORMANCE FOR A RESIDENTIAL MODEL IN SIX CLIMATES: A COMPARISON OF NBSLD, BLAST 2, AND DOE-2.1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

I-' O'l Annual Heating Requirements NBSLD BLAST DOE-2 (SWF)Cooling Requirements (10 6 Btu) Btu) I'" I NBSLD III DOE-2 (DOE-2.1 predictions of annual heating and cooling requirements

Carroll, William L.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

214

ANALYSIS OF THE PERFORMANCE AND COST EFFECTIVENESS OF NINE SMALL WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS FUNDED BY THE DOE SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

p.11. Ibid. , p.13 U.S. DOE. Annual Report to Congress. Q2.Cit. p.155, Table 22. (a)DOE/EIA 1980 Annualto Congress, Vol.2, (DOE/EIA-0173(80)/2) Data represent

Kay, J.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

215

DOE General Competencies  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The DOE General Competencies are the personal and professional attributes that are critical to successful performance. A competency model is a collection of competencies that together define...

216

DOE-DARPA High-Performance Corrosion-Resistant Materials (HPCRM), Annual HPCRM Team Meeting & Technical Review  

SciTech Connect

The overall goal is to develop high-performance corrosion-resistant iron-based amorphous-metal coatings for prolonged trouble-free use in very aggressive environments: seawater & hot geothermal brines. The specific technical objectives are: (1) Synthesize Fe-based amorphous-metal coating with corrosion resistance comparable/superior to Ni-based Alloy C-22; (2) Establish processing parameter windows for applying and controlling coating attributes (porosity, density, bonding); (3) Assess possible cost savings through substitution of Fe-based material for more expensive Ni-based Alloy C-22; (4) Demonstrate practical fabrication processes; (5) Produce quality materials and data with complete traceability for nuclear applications; and (6) Develop, validate and calibrate computational models to enable life prediction and process design.

Farmer, J; Brown, B; Bayles, B; Lemieux, T; Choi, J; Ajdelsztajn, L; Dannenberg, J; Lavernia, E; Schoenung, J; Branagan, D; Blue, C; Peter, B; Beardsley, B; Graeve, O; Aprigliano, L; Yang, N; Perepezko, J; Hildal, K; Kaufman, L; Lewandowski, J; Perepezko, J; Hildal, K; Kaufman, L; Lewandowski, J; Boudreau, J

2007-09-21T23:59:59.000Z

217

U.S. Department of Energy High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Implementation Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Energy High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Implementation Plan August 15, 2008 U.S. Department of Energy High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Implementation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS................................................................................................................................. iii 1 DOE COMMITMENT TO HPSB .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Federal HPSB Drivers and Commitments ........................................................................... 1 1.2 DOE-Specific HPSB Commitments .................................................................................... 2 2 DOE HPSB DIRECTIVES..................................................................................................... 3

218

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, Contents, 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 1, 2009 iii 1. The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) The DOE Directives System includes a hierarchy of documents that describe how the Department...

219

DOE-STD-1082-94 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE requirements are identified in DOE Rules, Orders, Notices, Immediate Action Directives, and Manuals (hereinafter referred to as DOE requirements documents). Preparation,...

220

Delegating to a Powerless Intermediary: Does It Reduce Punishment?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Powerless Intermediary: Does it Reduce Punishment? ? Reginefact that the dictator does not directly determine the ?nala way of avoiding punishment does not signi?cantly increase

Grossman, Zachary; Oexl, Regine

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

DOE Building Energy Performance Taxonomy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ehicle s toragemaintenance Service --- I ndustrial s hop Service --- D ry---cleaningLaundry Service --- A rtVideoPhotography S tudio Service --- O ther s ervice Parking G...

222

ANNUAL HEATING AND COOLING REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN DAY PERFORMANCE FOR A RESIDENTIAL MODEL IN SIX CLIMATES: A COMPARISON OF NBSLD, BLAST 2, AND DOE-2.1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and gains. BLAST DOE-2.1 (eWF) r 7SOF - 680F 75.SoF - 70.5DOE-2 ( SWF) _o_~_"'_ DOE-2 (eWF) I i I rI '"d C\\! -10 o H

Carroll, William L.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

223

DOE F 1325  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 21, 2010 Report No. OAS-L-10-07 July 21, 2010 Report No. OAS-L-10-07 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A10RL006) SUBJECT: Report on "Integrated Safety Management at the Office of River Protection" TO: Manager, Office of River Protection INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy (Department) regulates and inspects the safety of its own facilities and operations, many of which involve radioactive or hazardous materials. On October 15, 1996, the Department issued DOE Policy 450.4, Safety Management System Policy, which recognizes that Safety Management Systems provide a formal, organized process whereby people can plan, perform, assess, and improve the safe conduct of work. The Safety Management System process is institutionalized through Department directives and is incorporated into contracts to establish Department-wide safety

224

A review of potential turbine technology options for improving the off-design performance of direct coal-fired gas turbines in base load service. Second topical report  

SciTech Connect

The January, 1988 draft topical report, entitled ``An Assessment of Off-Design Particle Control Performance on Direct Coal-Fired Gas Turbine Systems`` [Ref.1.1], identified the need to assess potential trade-offs in turbine aerodynamic and thermodynamic design which may offer improvements in the performance, operational and maintenance characteristics of open-cycle, direct coal-fired, combustion gas turbines. In this second of a series of three topical reports, an assessment of the technical options posed by the above trade-offs is presented. The assessment is based on the current status of gas turbine technology. Several industry and university experts were contacted to contribute to the study. Literature sources and theoretical considerations are used only to provide additional background and insight to the technology involved.

Thomas, R.L.

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

225

A review of potential turbine technology options for improving the off-design performance of direct coal-fired gas turbines in base load service  

SciTech Connect

The January, 1988 draft topical report, entitled An Assessment of Off-Design Particle Control Performance on Direct Coal-Fired Gas Turbine Systems'' (Ref.1.1), identified the need to assess potential trade-offs in turbine aerodynamic and thermodynamic design which may offer improvements in the performance, operational and maintenance characteristics of open-cycle, direct coal-fired, combustion gas turbines. In this second of a series of three topical reports, an assessment of the technical options posed by the above trade-offs is presented. The assessment is based on the current status of gas turbine technology. Several industry and university experts were contacted to contribute to the study. Literature sources and theoretical considerations are used only to provide additional background and insight to the technology involved.

Thomas, R.L.

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

226

The European Performance of Buildings Directive - Case Study: New Headquarters of the European Central Bank in Frankfurt am Main  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The EPBD was passed as a Directive in 2002 paving the way for national legislation, the German version of which is the EnEV 2007, passed in October 2007. These dates mark roughly the start and end of the feasibility and design phase for the design of the New ECB Premises. The paper aims to show how, in the absence of approved legislation, the client and design team have worked together to pre-empt legislative requirements before these were officially published in 2007. Lessons learned from the implementation of the new calculation methods required by EnEV2007 will be discussed and the adopted calculation procedure outlined. The talk is given from the perspective of a building owner/user. Lessons learnt from the operation of the client's existing buildings will be highlighted and shown how these were incorporated into the requirements for the new building.

Neeson, M.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

High Performance Direct Gravitational N-body Simulations on Graphics Processing Unit I: An implementation in Cg  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We present the results of gravitational direct $N$-body simulations using the commercial graphics processing units (GPU) NVIDIA Quadro FX1400 and GeForce 8800GTX, and compare the results with GRAPE-6Af special purpose hardware. The force evaluation of the $N$-body problem was implemented in Cg using the GPU directly to speed-up the calculations. The integration of the equations of motions were, running on the host computer, implemented in C using the 4th order predictor-corrector Hermite integrator with block time steps. We find that for a large number of particles ($N \\apgt 10^4$) modern graphics processing units offer an attractive low cost alternative to GRAPE special purpose hardware. A modern GPU continues to give a relatively flat scaling with the number of particles, comparable to that of the GRAPE. The GRAPE is designed to reach double precision, whereas the GPU is intrinsically single-precision. For relatively large time steps, the total energy of the N-body system was conserved better than to one in $10^6$ on the GPU, which is impressive given the single-precision nature of the GPU. For the same time steps, the GRAPE gave somewhat more accurate results, by about an order of magnitude. However, smaller time steps allowed more energy accuracy on the grape, around $10^{-11}$, whereas for the GPU machine precision saturates around $10^{-6}$ For $N\\apgt 10^6$ the GeForce 8800GTX was about 20 times faster than the host computer. Though still about a factor of a few slower than GRAPE, modern GPUs outperform GRAPE in their low cost, long mean time between failure and the much larger onboard memory; the GRAPE-6Af holds at most 256k particles whereas the GeForce 8800GTX can hold 9 million particles in memory.

Simon Portegies Zwart; Robert Belleman; Peter Geldof

2007-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

228

DOE O 481.1A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

All Departmental Elements Office of Management and Administration U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 01-03-01 Sunset Review: 01-03-03 Expires: 01-03-05 SUBJECT: WORK FOR OTHERS (NON-DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FUNDED WORK) 1. OBJECTIVES. Work for Others (WFO) is the performance of work for non-Department of Energy (DOE) entities by DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and/or their respective contractor personnel or the use of DOE/NNSA facilities that is not directly funded by DOE appropriations. WFO has the following objectives. a. To provide assistance to other Federal agencies and non-Federal entities in accomplishing goals that may otherwise be unattainable and to avoid the possible duplication of effort at Federal facilities.

229

Office of Nuclear Safety - Directives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nuclear and Facility Safety Directives Nuclear and Facility Safety Directives The HSS Office of Nuclear Safety is the responsible office for the development, interpretation, and revision of the following Department of Energy (DOE) directives. Go to DOE's Directives Web Page to view these directives. DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards Program DOE O 252.1A promotes DOE's use of Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCS) as the primary method for application of technical standards and establishes and manages the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP) including technical standards development, information, activities, issues, and interactions. HS-30 Contact: Jeff Feit DOE Policy (P) 420.1, Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy DOE P 420.1, documents the Department's nuclear safety policy to design, construct, operate, and decommission its nuclear facilities in a manner that ensures adequate protection of workers, the public, and the environment.

230

DOE G 414  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INITIATED BY: INITIATED BY: http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

231

DOE G 414  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

232

ANALYSIS OF THE PERFORMANCE AND COST EFFECTIVENESS OF NINE SMALL WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS FUNDED BY THE DOE SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

national access to foreign oil, the federal government hasalmost exclusively and on oil foreign oil. shale costs ofprincipal bases. First, foreign oil does find its way into

Kay, J.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

DOE Onboarding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

One-Year Passport to Success One-Year Passport to Success What is On-boarding? Orientation On-boarding  Transactional focus and goals  Less than one week  Executed by HR Office  Address new employee needs  Completed paperwork  Strategic focus and goals  Starts before first day through first year  Supervisor & Senior Leadership involvement  Integrate multiple offices, functions and individuals  Address employee needs  Maximizes employee engagement and retention 2 On-boarding Program Goals 3  Build and sustain high-performance culture by accelerating time for new employee to become productive  Create learning opportunities that allow new employees to successfully integrate into their new DOE organization  Provide employees with the tools and resources to

234

Performance assessment of the direct disposal in unsaturated tuff or spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste owned by USDOE: Volume 2, Methodology and results  

SciTech Connect

This assessment studied the performance of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel in a hypothetical repository in unsaturated tuff. The results of this 10-month study are intended to help guide the Office of Environment Management of the US Department of Energy (DOE) on how to prepare its wastes for eventual permanent disposal. The waste forms comprised spent fuel and high-level waste currently stored at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) and the Hanford reservations. About 700 metric tons heavy metal (MTHM) of the waste under study is stored at INEL, including graphite spent nuclear fuel, highly enriched uranium spent fuel, low enriched uranium spent fuel, and calcined high-level waste. About 2100 MTHM of weapons production fuel, currently stored on the Hanford reservation, was also included. The behavior of the waste was analyzed by waste form and also as a group of waste forms in the hypothetical tuff repository. When the waste forms were studied together, the repository was assumed also to contain about 9200 MTHM high-level waste in borosilicate glass from three DOE sites. The addition of the borosilicate glass, which has already been proposed as a final waste form, brought the total to about 12,000 MTHM.

Rechard, R.P. [ed.

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

Laboratory Directed Research and Development LDRD-FY-2011  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides a summary of the research conducted at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) during Fiscal Year (FY) 2011. This report demonstrates the types of cutting edge research the INL is performing to help ensure the nation's energy security. The research conducted under this program is aligned with our strategic direction, benefits the Department of Energy (DOE) and is in compliance with DOE order 413.2B. This report summarizes the diverse research and development portfolio with emphasis on the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) mission, encompassing both advanced nuclear science and technology and underlying technologies.

Dena Tomchak

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

236

DOE Federal Quality Council: Activities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Section B Crosswalk of DOE O 414.1D, ISO 9001, and NQA-1 - Task Planning Document (TPD) DOE QA Requirement Training Performance Metrics for QA Program Effectiveness (Note: For a...

237

Natural phenomena hazards assessment criteria for DOE sites: DOE Standard DOE-STD-1023-95  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper summarizes hazard assessment criteria (DOE-STD-1023-95) for Natural Phenomena Hazards (NPH) at DOE sites. The DOE has established policy and requirements for NPH mitigation for DOE sites and facilities using a graded approach by DOE Order 5480.28. The graded approach is implemented by five performance categories established for structures, systems, and components (SSCs) at DOE facilities based on criteria provided by DOE-STD-1021-93. In applying the design/evaluation criteria of DOE-STD-1020-94 for DOE facilities subjected to one of the natural phenomena hazards, the establishment of design basis load levels consistent with the corresponding performance category is required. This standard provides general criteria as well as specific criteria for natural phenomena hazard assessments to ensure that adequate design basis load levels are established for design and/or evaluation of DOE facilities.

Chen, J.C.; Lu, S.C.; Boissonnade, A.C. [and others

1995-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

238

Outline Development of Direct PCR Benefits of Direct PCR ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... 1 Direct PCR Amplification of STR Loci: Protocols and Performance ... Benefits of direct PCR Collection media: FTA and 903 paper ...

2011-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

239

Performance Assessment of Bi-Directional Knotless Tissue-Closure Devices in Juvenile Chinook Salmon Surgically Implanted with Acoustic Transmitters, 2009 - Final Report  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this report is to assess the performance of bi-directional knotless tissue-closure devices for use in tagging juvenile salmon. This study is part of an ongoing effort at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to reduce unwanted effects of tags and tagging procedures on the survival and behavior of juvenile salmonids, by assessing and refining suturing techniques, suture materials, and tag burdens. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of the knotless (barbed) suture, using three different suture patterns (treatments: 6-point, Wide N, Wide N Knot), to the current method of suturing (MonocrylTM monofilament, discontinuous sutures with a 2222 knot) used in monitoring and research programs with a novel antiseptic barrier on the wound (Second Skin).

Woodley, Christa M.; Wagner, Katie A.; Bryson, Amanda J.

2012-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

240

Presentation to the EAC - Strategic Plan for DOE OE - Peter Bonner (Bill Parks)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Strategic Strategic Planning Process As Is/Situation Assessment Mission, Vision & Values Strategic Challenges Strategic Options/Choices Uncertainties/ Scenarios/ Constraints Strategic Goals, Objectives,& Actions Performance Measures & Accountability Strategic Plan Phase 2: Integration of Strategic Plan DOE-OE Strategic Planning Outcomes * Adaptive strategies and plans to lead OE into a sustainable future with clear performance indicators * External leadership in R&D, security, permitting/siting, and analytics/modeling * Internal clarity on OE strengths, cross-OE/DOE/government partnerships, organization capacity, and emerging leaders * Strategic direction, priorities, and commitment of resources consistent with direction and priorities * Alignment with tacit and explicit DOE mission and strategy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


242

Presented at the ASHRAE/DOE/BTECC Conference, Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Buildings VII, Clearwater Beach, Florida, December 7-11, 1998, and published in the Proceedings.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LBNL-41352 TA-421 Presented at the ASHRAE/DOE/BTECC Conference, Thermal Performance of the Exterior, Christian Köhler, Howdy Goudey, Daniel Türler, and Dariush Arasteh P.E., ASHRAE member Windows Griffith, Christian Köhler, Howdy Goudey, Daniel Türler, and Dariush Arasteh P.E., ASHRAE member ABSTRACT

243

DOE Patents Database - Widget  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Get the DOepatents Widget... Get the DOepatents Widget... Download the DOepatents widget to find DOE patent data, read news about DOE inventions, and browse the most-viewed patents. You may download and install this widget using the html inclusion code. Get the DOepatents widget and many other great free widgets at Widgetbox! Not seeing a widget? (More info) Widget Features Search: Find patent information resulting from DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) dating from the 1940s to today. Most Viewed: Browse the most frequently viewed patent records. News: Read about highlighted DOE inventions and inventors. Featured: View recently issued patents and patents owned exclusively by DOE. Contact: Send comments or questions about this collection. XML: Link directly to the DOepatents XML data service, with help and

244

The Effect of Airborne Contaminants on Fuel Cell Performance and Durability - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

63 63 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Jean St-Pierre (Primary Contact), Yunfeng Zhai, Michael Angelo, Trent Molter, Leonard Bonville, Ugur Pasaogullari, Mark Aindow, William Collins, Silvia Wessel Hawaii Natural Energy Institute 1680 East-West Road Honolulu, HI 96822 Phone: (808) 956-3909 Email: jsp7@hawaii.edu DOE Managers HQ: Nancy Garland Phone: (202) 586-5673 Email: Nancy.Garland@ee.doe.gov GO: Reginald Tyler Phone: (720) 356-1805 Email: Reginald.Tyler@go.doe.gov Technical Advisor Walt Podolski Phone: (630) 252-7558 Email: podolski@anl.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0000467 Subcontractors: * University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT * UTC Power, South Windsor, CT * Ballard Power Systems, Burnaby, BC, Canada

245

Investigation of Micro- and Macro-Scale Transport Processes for Improved Fuel Cell Performance - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Jon P. Owejan (Primary Contact), Matthew Mench, Michael Hickner, Satish Kandlikar, Thomas Trabold, Jeffrey Gagliardo, Anusorn Kongkanand, Wenbin Gu, Paul Nicotera General Motors 10 Carriage Street Honeoye Falls, NY 14472 Phone: (585) 953-5558 Email: jon.owejan@gm.com DOE Managers HQ: Donna Ho Phone: (202) 586-8000 Email: Donna.Ho@ee.doe.gov GO: David Peterson Phone: (720) 356-1747 Email: David.Peterson@go.doe.gov Technical Advisor John Kopasz Phone: (630) 252-7531 Email: kopasz@anl.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0000470 Subcontractors: * Penn State University, University Park, PA * University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN

246

Performance Management Plan  

SciTech Connect

This Performance Management Plan describes the approach for accelerating cleanup activities of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office (NNSA/NV) Environmental Management (EM) Program. This approach accelerates the reduction of risk at NNSA/NV sites while performing the work responsibly, effectively, and more efficiently. In May 2002, NNSA/NV EM and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection signed a Letter of Intent formalizing an agreement to pursue accelerated risk reduction and cleanup for activities within the State of Nevada. This Performance Management Plan provides the strategic direction for implementing the Letter of Intent.

IT Corporation, Las Vegas, NV

2002-08-21T23:59:59.000Z

247

DOE News Release - DOE Conducts Hybrid Electric Vehicle Testing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

21, 2003 DOE conducts Hybrid Electric Vehicle testing The U.S. Department of Energy, through its Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity, is Baseline Performance and Fleet testing the...

248

DOE Solar Decathlon: Directions and Transportation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Transportation Visit the U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon 2013 at the Orange Country Great Park in Irvine, California The Great Park is situated in the geographic...

249

Quality Assurance: Policy and Directives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Policy and Directives The Office of Quality Assurance is responsible for DOE's quality assurance (QA) policy and requirements, and for providing assistance with QA implementation....

250

Final Project Report: DOE Award FG02?04ER25606 Overlay Transit Networking for Scalable, High Performance Data Communication across Heterogeneous Infrastructure  

SciTech Connect

As the flood of data associated with leading edge computational science continues to escalate, the challenge of supporting the distributed collaborations that are now characteristic of it becomes increasingly daunting. The chief obstacles to progress on this front lie less in the synchronous elements of collaboration, which have been reasonably well addressed by new global high performance networks, than in the asynchronous elements, where appropriate shared storage infrastructure seems to be lacking. The recent report from the Department of Energy on the emerging 'data management challenge' captures the multidimensional nature of this problem succinctly: Data inevitably needs to be buffered, for periods ranging from seconds to weeks, in order to be controlled as it moves through the distributed and collaborative research process. To meet the diverse and changing set of application needs that different research communities have, large amounts of non-archival storage are required for transitory buffering, and it needs to be widely dispersed, easily available, and configured to maximize flexibility of use. In today's grid fabric, however, massive storage is mostly concentrated in data centers, available only to those with user accounts and membership in the appropriate virtual organizations, allocated as if its usage were non-transitory, and encapsulated behind legacy interfaces that inhibit the flexibility of use and scheduling. This situation severely restricts the ability of application communities to access and schedule usable storage where and when they need to in order to make their workflow more productive. (p.69f) One possible strategy to deal with this problem lies in creating a storage infrastructure that can be universally shared because it provides only the most generic of asynchronous services. Different user communities then define higher level services as necessary to meet their needs. One model of such a service is a Storage Network, analogous to those used within computation centers, but designed to operate on a global scale. Building on a basic storage service that is as primitive as possible, such a Global Storage Network would define a framework within which higher level services can be created. If this framework enabled a variety of more specialized middleware and supported a wide array of applications, then interoperability and collaboration could occur based on that common framework. The research in Logistical Networking (LN) carried out under the DOE's SciDAC program tested the value of this approach within the context of several SciDAC application communities. Below we briefly describe the basic design of the LN storage network and some of the results that the Logistical Networking community has achieved.

Micah Beck; Terry Moore

2007-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

251

New High Performance Water Vapor Membranes to Improve Fuel Cell Balance of Plant Efficiency and Lower Costs (SBIR Phase I) - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Earl H. Wagener (Primary Contact), Brad P. Morgan, Jeffrey R. DiMaio Tetramer Technologies L.L.C. 657 S. Mechanic St. Pendleton, SC 29670 Phone: (864) 646-6282 Email: earl.wagener@tetramertechnologies.com DOE Manager HQ: Nancy Garland Phone: (202) 586-5673 Email: Nancy.Garland@ee.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-SC0006172 Project Start Date: June 17, 2011 Project End Date: March 16, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Demonstrate water vapor transport membrane with * >18,000 gas permeation units (GPU) Water vapor membrane with less than 20% loss in * performance after stress tests Crossover leak rate: <150 GPU * Temperature Durability of 90°C with excursions to * 100°C Cost of <$10/m

252

DOE Grids Service Transition  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Grids Service Transition DOE Grids Service Transition Services Overview ECS Audio/Video Conferencing Fasterdata IPv6 Network Network Performance Tools (perfSONAR) ESnet OID Registry PGP Key Service Virtual Circuits (OSCARS) DOE Grids Service Transition Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net DOE Grids Service Transition Background ESnet has decided to transition support and management for the certificate services provided by the DOE Grids public key infrastructure (PKI) to the Open Sciences Grid (OSG). OSG and ESnet provide service to many of the same user communities, and have long been collaborators in the areas of identity

253

Geothermal Technologies Program: Direct Use  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This general publication describes geothermal direct use systems, and how they have been effectively used throughout the country. It also describes the DOE program R&D efforts in this area, and summarizes several projects using direct use technology.

Not Available

2004-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

DOE-STD-3026-99 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-99 6-99 DOE-STD-3026-99 February 24, 2009 Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan Superseding DOE NE F 3-44 July 1986 This standard was developed primarily for application in U.S. Department of Energy programs. It contains specific direction for HEPA filter testing performed at a DOE-accepted HEPA Filter Test Facility (FTF). Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, deletions) and any pertinent data that may improve this document should be sent to the Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards (EH-31), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585, by letter or by using the self-addressed Document Improvement Proposal form (DOE F 1300.3) appearing at the end of this document. DOE-STD-3026-99: Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan More Documents & Publications

255

The life cycle CO2 emission performance of the DOE/NASA solar power satellite system: a comparison of alternative power generation systems in Japan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Solar power generation and, in particular, space solar power generation seem to be one of the most promising electric power generation technologies for reducing emissions of global warming gases (denoted collectively as CO2 emissions below). ... Keywords: Alternative technology, CO, Department of Energy (DOE)/NASA reference system, life cycle assessment (LCA), power generation, solar power satellite (SPS)

H. Hayami; M. Nakamura; K. Yoshioka

2005-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

Summary of the Special Analysis of Savannah River Depleted Uranium Trioxide Demonstrating the Before and After Impacts on the DOE Order 435.1 Performance Objective and the Peak Dose  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report summarizes the special analysis (SA) of the Savannah River Depleted Uranium Trioxide waste stream (SVRSURANIUM03, Revision 1) demonstrating the before and after impacts of the waste stream to the DOE Order 435.1 performance objective at the disposal facility, and the peak dose. The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) requested this SA and asked the Nevada Site Office (NSO) to run the SA deterministically and assume that all the model conditions remain the same regardless of the length of time to the peak dose. Although the NDEP accepts that DOE Order 435.1 requires a compliance period of 1,000 years, it also requested to know what year, if any, the specific DOE performance objectives will be exceeded. Given the NDEPs requested model conditions, the SA demonstrates the Rn-222 peak dose will occur in about 2 million years and will exceed the performance objective in about 6,000 years. The 0.25 mSv y-1 all-pathway performance objective was not exceeded for the resident scenario after reaching the 4 million year peak dose.

Shott, G.J.

2011-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

257

EFCOG / DOE Electrical Safety  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

&D Decontamination and Decommissioning dc direct current DOE Department of Energy EFCOG Energy Facility Contractors Purpose: This tool is intended to determine the severity of an electrical energy event based reportability. Scope: This tool establishes a standardized approach for tracking and trending electrical energy

258

DOE Average Results  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE DOE Average Results FY 12 DOE Target FY 12 Customer Perspective: Customer Satisfaction: -Timeliness 92 88 -Quality 94 92 Effective Service Partnership: -Extent of Customer Satisfaction with the responsiveness, etc. 90 92 Internal Business Perspective: Acquisition Excellence: -Extent to which internal quality control systems are effective 90 88 Most Effective Use of Contracting Approaches to Maximize Efficiency and Cost Effectiveness: Use of Competition: -% of total $'s obligated on competitive acquisitions >$3000 (Agency Level Only) 94 85 -% of acquisition actions competed for actions > $3000 (Agency Level Only) 65 68 Performance Based Acquisition: - % PBA actions relative to total eligible new acquisition actions (applicable to new actions > $25K) 82

259

Facility Representatives, DOE-STD-1063-2011, Change Notice 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Industry Documents ... 3 2.1.1 DOE Directives (Polices, Orders, Manuals, Guides) ... 3 2.1.2 DOE...

260

DOE-STD-3020-97; DOE Standard Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

POUND POUND DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 Supersedes DOE NE F3-45 January 1987 DOE STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HEPA FILTERS USED BY DOE CONTRACTORS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DE97000782 DOE-STD-3020-97 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy standard supersedes DOE NE F3-45 and is approved for use by

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

DOE-STD-3022-98; DOE Standard DOE HEPA Filter Test Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22-98 22-98 May 1998 Superseding DOE NE F 3-42 January 1987 DOE STANDARD DOE HEPA FILTER TEST PROGRAM U.S. Department of Energy FSC 4460 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Order No. DE98001294 DOE-STD-3022-98 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard is approved for use by all DOE components and contractors.

262

DOE F 331.2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy Senior Executive Service Performance Appraisal DOE F 331.2 (10-01-01) Name: Title: Organization: Duty Station: Performance Rating Period: From: To:...

263

DOE-2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

standards in the U.S. and other countries. DOE-2 is also the basis of numerous handbooks on energy-efficient buildings and building components. Many design and consulting...

264

Technical Standards, DOE-STD-1082-94 - November 29, 1995 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

plans for DOE nuclear safety requirements. DOE requirements are identified in DOE Rules, Orders, Notices, Immediate Action Directives, and Manuals (hereinafter referred...

265

Order Module--DOE G 450.4-1B, INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDE |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

G 450.4-1B, INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM G 450.4-1B, INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDE Order Module--DOE G 450.4-1B, INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDE This Guide has two purposes. One purpose is to assist DOE contractors in developing, describing, and implementing an ISMS to comply with DOE P 450.4, Safety Management system Policy; DOE P 450.5, Line Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight; DOE P 450.6, Secretarial Policy Statement Environment, Safety and Health; DOE P 411.1, Safety Management FRAM; and the following provisions of the DEAR: 48 CFR 970.5223-1, which requires integration of environment, safety, and health into work planning and execution; 48 CFR 970.5204-2, which deals with laws, regulations, and DOE directives; and 48 CFR 970.1100-1, which requires performance-based contracting.

266

Joint DOE-Rosatom Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement Statement on the U.S. - Russian Excess Weapon-grade Plutonium Disposition Program The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the Federal Atomic Energy Agency, Russian Federation (Rosatom), as the Executive Agents for the implementation of the 2000 Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement, hereby reaffirm their commitment to implementing the 2000 Agreement and effective and transparent disposition of 34 metric tons each of weapon- grade plutonium designated as no longer required for defense purposes. They confirm that the preferred disposition method for such plutonium to implement the 2000 Agreement is irradiation of nuclear fuel in reactors. Their expert groups are directed to: * Provide for the performance of technical analysis that will contribute to both

267

Data Collection for Project Management and Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Data Collection for Project Management and Performance Donald Macdonald November 19, 2009 DOE's PM Approach Provide DOE with project information to allow DOE to adequately...

268

4th Annual DOE-ERSP PI Meeting: Abstracts  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Focus Areas PresentationsDOE National Laboratories 1:30of the liquid-solid interface does not alter the segregationof contaminants at DOE field sites. Hy- potheses directed

Hazen, Terry C.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

www.netl.doe.gov Impact of Load Following on Power Plant Cost and Performance: Literature Review and Industry Interviews Prepared By  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed therein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United

Jim Black; Paul Myles; Steve Herron

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

DOE Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

271

DOE Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

772 772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

272

DOE-STD-1045-93 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5-93 5-93 DOE-STD-1045-93 December 14,1998 Guide to Good Practices for Notifications and Investigation of Abnormal Events Change Notice No. 1 (December 1998) | Reaffirmed 2001 "Notifications" and "Investigation of Abnormal Events" are elements of an effective Conduct of Operations program. The complexity and array of activities performed in DOE facilities dictate the necessity for a coordinated notifications program and a consistent method for investigating abnormal events to promote safe and efficient operations. DOE-STD-1045-93, Guide to Good Practices for Notifications and Investigation of Abnormal Events More Documents & Publications OPS 9.7 Notifications 8/24/98 OPS 9.6 Investigation of Abnormal Events 8/24/98 Technical Standards,DOE Standards and Corresponding Directives

273

Software Quality Assurance: Directives and Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directives and Guidance Directives and Guidance DOE O 414.1D, Quality Assurance DOE G 414.1-4, Software Guide for use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance DOE Order O 414.1D, Quality Assurance, includes Attachment 4 addressing SQA requirements for nuclear safety applications at DOE nuclear facilities. The DOE O 414.1D was issued April 25, 2011. This Order and its associated Guide for safety software, DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements. The Order identifies 10 software quality work activities that are to be performed using the graded approach specified in the Order. These 10 work activities are: (1) software project management, (2) software risk management, (3) software configuration management, (4) procurement and vendor management, (5) software requirements identification and management, (6) software design and implementation, (7) software safety design, (8) verification and validation, (9) problem reporting and corrective action, and (10) training of personnel in the design, development, use and evaluation of safety software. These 10 work activities were consolidated from practices and activities identified in several well known consensus standards and federal requirements. Safety software must be acquired, developed and implemented using ASME NQA-1-2008 with the NQA-1a-2009 addenda (or later edition), Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications, Part 1 and Subpart 2.7, or other national or international consensus standards that provide an equivalent level of quailty assurance requirements as NQA-1-2008.

274

Performance evaluation of the technical capabilities of DOE sites for disposal of mixed low-level waste: Volume 3, Site evaluations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A team of analysts designed and conducted a performance evaluation to estimate the technical capabilities of fifteen Department of Energy sites for disposal of mixed low-level waste (i.e., waste that contains both low-level radioactive materials and hazardous constituents). Volume 1 summarizes the process for selecting the fifteen sites, the methodology used in the evaluation, and the conclusions derived from the evaluation. Volume 2 provides details about the site-selection process, the performance-evaluation methodology, and the overall results of the analysis. Volume 3 contains detailed evaluations of the fifteen sites and discussion of the results for each site.

Waters, R.D.; Gruebel, M.M. [eds.] [eds.

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

DOE/EIA-0206(85)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5) 5) 1985 This publication is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO). Ordering information purchase of this other Energy Information Administration (EIA) publications may be obtained from the GPO or the EIA's National Energy Information Center (NEIC), Questions on energy statistics should be directed to the NEIC, Addresses and telephone numbers below. An order form is enclosed for your convenience. National Energy Information Center, El-20 Energy Information Administration DC Superintendent of" Documents U.S. Government, Printing Office Washington, DC for Printing January 15, 1987 DOE/EIA-0206(85) Distribution Category UC-98 Performance Profiles of Major Energy Producers 1985 Energy Information Administration

276

A high performance differential amplifier through the direct monolithic integration of InP HBTs and Si CMOS on silicon substrates  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We present results on the direct monolithic integration of III-V devices and Si CMOS on a silicon substrate. InP HBTs (0.5 times 5 um2 emitter) with ft and fmax > 200 GHz were grown directly in windows adjacent to CMOS ...

Bulsara, Mayank

277

DOE`s Advanced Turbine Systems Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper discusses the Advanced Turbine Systems (ATS) Program, which is necessary to achieve METC`s vision for future IGCC systems. This major new program is a cooperative effort in which DOE`s Office of Fossil Energy (FE) and Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy (CE) are joining forces with the private sector to develop ultra-high efficiency gas turbine systems. A goal of this Program is to have a utility-size gas turbine with a 60 percent efficiency (lower heating value basis (LHV)) ready for commercialization by the year 2002. (While this paper focuses on utility-size turbines which are the primary interest of this audience, an ultra-high efficiency, industrial-size gas turbine will also be developed in the ATS Program with a comparable improvement in efficiency.) Natural gas is the target fuel of the Program, a recognition by DOE that natural gas will play a significant role in supplying future power generation needs in the US. However, to insure that the US has fuel supply options, ATS designs will be adaptable to coal and biomass fuels. Therefore, the ATS Program will directly benefit IGCC and other advanced coal based power generation systems. Cost and efficiency improvements in the turbine system as well as in the gasification and gas stream cleanup plant sections will enable IGCC to reach a cost target of $1,000--$1,280/kW and an efficiency goal of 52 percent (higher heating value basis (HHV)) in the post-2000 market.

Bechtel, T.F.; Bajura, R.A.; Salvador, L.A.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

278

Directed Nano-Scale and Macro-Scale Architectures for Semiconductor Absorbers and Transparent Conducting Substrates for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Thomas F. Jaramillo (Primary Contact), Arnold J. Forman, Zhebo Chen Dept. of Chemical Engineering, 381 N-S Axis Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 Phone: (650) 498-6879 Email: jaramillo@stanford.edu DOE Manager HQ: Eric Miller Phone: (202) 287-5829 Email: Eric.Miller@hq.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-AC36-08GO28308 Subcontract Number: NFT-9-88567-01 Subcontractor: Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Stanford, CA Project Start Date: December 18, 2008 Projected End Date: September 30, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives The main objective of this project is to develop third- generation materials and structures with new properties that can potentially meet DOE targets (2013 and 2018) for

279

Performance evaluation of the technical capabilities of DOE sites for disposal of mixed low-level waste. Volume 1: Executive summary  

SciTech Connect

A team of analysts designed and conducted a performance evaluation (PE) to estimate the technical capabilities of fifteen Department of Energy sites for disposal of mixed low-level waste (i.e., waste that contains both low-level radioactive materials and hazardous constituents). Volume 1 summarizes the process for selecting the fifteen sites, the methodology used in the evaluation, and the conclusions derived from the evaluation. Volume 1 is an executive summary both of the PE methodology and of the results obtained from the PEs. While this volume briefly reviews the scope and method of analyses, its main objective is to emphasize the important insights and conclusions derived from the conduct of the PEs. Volume 2 provides details about the site-selection process, the performance-evaluation methodology, and the overall results of the analysis. Volume 3 contains detailed evaluations of the fifteen sites and discussions of the results for each site.

NONE

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Performance evaluation of the technical capabilities of DOE sites for disposal of mixed low-level waste. Volume 2: Technical basis and discussion of results  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A team of analysts designed and conducted a performance evaluation to estimate the technical capabilities of fifteen Department of Energy sites for disposal of mixed low-level waste (i.e., waste that contains both low-level radioactive materials and hazardous constituents). Volume 1 summarizes the process for selecting the fifteen sites, the methodology used in the evaluation, and the conclusions derived from the evaluation. Volume 2 first describes the screening process used to determine the sites to be considered in the PEs. This volume then provides the technical details of the methodology for conducting the performance evaluations. It also provides a comparison and analysis of the overall results for all sites that were evaluated. Volume 3 contains detailed evaluations of the fifteen sites and discussions of the results for each site.

Waters, R.D.; Gruebel, M.M.; Hospelhorn, M.B. [and others

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Performative architecture  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The following thesis explores two central hypotheses. On the one hand it introduces the idea of performative architecture (performance in design), and has done so with the desire to contribute directly to the expansion of ...

Araya, Sergio (Sergio Alejandro)

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

DOE-STD-1160-2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Occupational Safety Functional Area Qualification Standard The Occupational Safety technical functional area qualification standard (FAQS) establishes common functional area competency requirements for all DOE occupational safety personnel who provide assistance, or direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOEs defense nuclear facilities.

283

P2 performance measurement tools workbook: Draft  

SciTech Connect

The underlying purpose of the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention (WMin/P2) Program is compliance with the waste management regulations set forth by the DOE, the federal government, and individual state and local agencies 1. In addition to these regulatory mandates, the increases in waste management costs and public interest in environmental issues have created other drivers to develop and demonstrate an effective WMin/P2 Program. The Waste Minimization Division (EM-334) must have adequate methods to calculate and roll up pollution prevention (P2) progress to meet the WMin/P2 requirements; these requirements support DOE and national objectives and direct funding. This document outlines a system to evaluate DOE`s P2 progress towards the waste reduction requirements. The emphasis of these pollution prevention measurements is to evaluate whether P2 activities are effective, (i.e., has the required amount of waste been reduced as a result of the P2 activities) and to evaluate the cost management of P2 projects. The performance evaluation system presented in this document encompass these aspects: (1) site requirements that apply to all DOE waste generating organizations, (2) a baseline that is not affected by short-term waste generation, and (3) key indicators that can be rolled up across DOE sites and across specific Cognizant Secretarial Officers` (CSO) sites. In a performance-based management system, requirements are the fundamental link between the planning and measurement process. The site requirements are {open_quotes}targets{close_quotes} at the process or activity level. Measuring DOE`s P2 progress toward these requirements provides the necessary feedback to (1) compare performance with the requirements/standards (i.e., whether the reduction requirement of 50% by 1999 is achievable) (2) detect departures from planned levels of performance, and (3) restore performance to the planned levels or achieve new levels of performance.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

DOE Building Technologies Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Overview Overview September 2013 Buildings.energy.gov/BPD BuildingsPerformanceDatabase@ee.doe.gov 2 * The BPD statistically analyzes trends in the energy performance and physical & operational characteristics of real commercial and residential buildings. The Buildings Performance Database 3 Design Principles * The BPD contains actual data on existing buildings - not modeled data or anecdotal evidence. * The BPD enables statistical analysis without revealing information about individual buildings. * The BPD cleanses and validates data from many sources and translates it into a standard format. * In addition to the BPD's analysis tools, third parties will be able to create applications using the

285

Facility Representative Program: Program Directives and Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facility Representative of the Year Award FR Program Assessment Guide (Appendix B, DOE STD 1063-2011) Program Directives and Guidance FR Program Standard, DOE STD 1063-2011,...

286

GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- - a,- p^A CU ^ ^JL\ CC6p^ w b A GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS Office of Management, November 2008 The DOE Headquarters Forrestal and Germantown buildings have award-winning energy conservation and environmental quality programs focused on making our buildings as green as possible and, enabling them to serve as showcases for the entire Department. Both the Forrestal and the Germantown facilities have earned EPA's Energy Star designation, ranking them among the nation's top buildings in terms of energy performance. Of all the buildings in the U.S. only approximately 4000 have earned this distinction. In addition, the Forrestal Building is one of only two Federal Energy Star Buildings in Washington DC. DOE Headquarters achieved these designations after years of effort by the facility managers and staffs to incorporate energy

287

ANALYSIS OF THE PERFORMANCE AND COST EFFECTIVENESS OF NINE SMALL WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS FUNDED BY THE DOE SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect

This report presents an analysis of the technical performance and cost effectiveness of nine small wind energy conversion systems (SWECS) funded during FY 1979 by the U.S. Department of Energy. Chapter 1 gives an analytic framework with which to evaluate the systems. Chapter 2 consists of a review of each of the nine projects, including project technical overviews, estimates of energy savings, and results of economic analysis. Chapter 3 summarizes technical, economic, and institutional barriers that are likely to inhibit widespread dissemination of SWECS technology.

Kay, J.

1982-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

Methodology to determine the technical performance and value proposition for grid-scale energy storage systems : a study for the DOE energy storage systems program.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As the amount of renewable generation increases, the inherent variability of wind and photovoltaic systems must be addressed in order to ensure the continued safe and reliable operation of the nation's electricity grid. Grid-scale energy storage systems are uniquely suited to address the variability of renewable generation and to provide other valuable grid services. The goal of this report is to quantify the technical performance required to provide di erent grid bene ts and to specify the proper techniques for estimating the value of grid-scale energy storage systems.

Byrne, Raymond Harry; Loose, Verne William; Donnelly, Matthew K. [Montana Tech of The University of Montana, Butte, MT; Trudnowski, Daniel J. [Montana Tech of The University of Montana, Butte, MT

2012-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

NETL: Methane Hydrates - DOE/NETL Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1, 2008 Project End: March 31, 2012 Project Funding Information: Phase 1 12 months, DOE Contribution: 622,131; Performer Contribution: 615,584 Phase 2 12 months, DOE...

290

DOE LM/GJ596  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Puerto Rico May 2005 Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. DE-AC01-02GJ79491 Approved for public release;...

291

DOE LM/GJ596  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

2005 Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. DE-AC01-02GJ79491 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited....

292

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE STD 1063, Facility Representatives  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

63-2011 63-2011 FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES DOE-STD-1063-2011 Familiar Level August 2011 1 DOE-STD-1063-2011 FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What are the purpose and scope of DOE-STD-1063-2011? 2. What are the definitions of the terms listed in section 3 of DOE-STD-1063-2011? 3. What are the duties, responsibilities, and authorities of facility representatives (FRs) and other key personnel? 4. What are the requirements of the FR program? 5. What are the Department of Energy (DOE)-wide FR performance indicators (PIs)? 6. How are DOE-wide FR PIs calculated? 7. What are the FR program objectives that should be measured by an FR program

293

Facility Representative Program: Program Performance Indicators  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program Performance Indicators DOE Corporate Reporting Data (ORPS, CAIRS, Others) Facility Representative Performance Indicator Guidance -- Appendix A in DOE-STD-1063-2011,...

294

Federal Energy Management Program: DOE Enhances Management of...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program DOE Enhances Management of Energy Savings Performance Contracts U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary...

295

DOE-HDBK-1092-98; DOE Handbook Electrical Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

092-98 092-98 January 1998 DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE98001290 DOE-HDBK-1092-98 DOE-HDBK-1092-98 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 3.0 ELECTRICAL PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 4.0 GROUNDING 5.0 SPECIAL OCCUPANCIES 6.0 REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT

296

Effective System Performance (ESP) Benchmark  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

System Performance (ESP) Benchmark It is now generally recognized in the high performance computing community that peak performance does not adequately predict the usefulness...

297

Optimizing the Low Temperature Cooling Energy Supply: Experimental Performance of an Absorption Chiller, a Compression Refrigeration Machine and Direct Cooling - a Comparison  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A strategy to optimize the low temperature cooling energy supply of a newly build office building is discussed against the background of a changing energy system. It is focused on, what production way - Direct Cooling, the Compression Refrigeration Machine or the Absorption Chiller provided with heat from Combined Heat and Power Plants - has the lowest primary energy consumption at what load level. For low levels this is direct cooling. If demand exceeds the capacity of direct cooling, the absorption chiller is the option to choose. However, in future the compression refrigeration machine is more efficient at providing high load levels than the Absorption Chiller. The operation analysis shows that flow rates are often held constant and the re-cooling temperatures are often above the ambient temperature. By the integration of automatic flow rate control and lowering the re-cooling temperature of the chillers, electricity consumption of pumps can be reduced and energy efficiency enhanced.

Uhrhan, S.; Gerber, A.

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

DOE CONTRACTOR PENSION PLANS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-13 1-13 For use in M&O and non-M&O cost reimbursement solicitations and contracts where work had been previously performed under a DOE M&O contract and the successor Contractor is (a) required to employ all or part of the former Contractor's workforce and sponsors the employee pension and benefit plans; or (b) retains sponsorship of benefit plans that survive performance of the contract work scope. Contracts in this latter category include, but are not limited to, environmental remediation, infrastructure services and other site-specific project completion contracts. DOE-H-1002 EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION: PAY AND BENEFITS (a) Contractor Employee Compensation Plan The Contractor shall submit, for Contracting Officer approval, by (fill-in

299

DOE-1 BDL SUMMARY. DOE-1 GROUP.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

may be this command. DOE~! Reference Manual. placed in BDL-3W-7405-EN ons c BDl, SUMMARY DOE~ I l.awrence , Californiaused in conjunction with other DOE~l documentation. Table of

Authors, Various

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

300

SWIMSAT: A Real-Aperture Radar to Measure Directional Spectra of Ocean Waves from SpaceMain Characteristics and Performance Simulation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The project SWIMSAT aims to measure the directional spectra of waves from space using a real-aperture radar with a low-incidence, conical-scanning beam. This systems design is based on airborne versions developed in France and the United States. ...

Danile Hauser; Elbatoul Soussi; Eric Thouvenot; Laurent Rey

2001-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

The Airborne Demonstrator for the Direct-Detection Doppler Wind Lidar ALADIN on ADM-Aeolus. Part II: Simulations and Rayleigh Receiver Radiometric Performance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In the frame of the Atmospheric Dynamics Mission Aeolus (ADM-Aeolus) satellite mission by the European Space Agency (ESA), a prototype of a direct-detection Doppler wind lidar was developed to measure wind from ground and aircraft at 355 nm. Wind ...

Ulrike Paffrath; Christian Lemmerz; Oliver Reitebuch; Benjamin Witschas; Ines Nikolaus; Volker Freudenthaler

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

Active DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Active DOE Technical Standards Active DOE Technical Standards Document Number Document Title Responsible SLM DOE-HDBK-1001-96 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 DOE-HDBK-1003-96 DOE-HDBK-1010-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/4-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1015/1-93

303

DOE Code:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

we1rbox installatiOn we1rbox installatiOn ____:....;...=.~;;....:..;=-+- DOE Code: - - !- Project Lead: Wes R1esland NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY J 3-24-10 1 Date: Project Information 1. Project Overview What are tne enwonmental mpacts? Contractor~~ _ _ _ _ ] 11 The purpose of this project is to prepare a pad for a 90 ton crane to get 1nto positiOn and ng up so we can 1 set our new weir box into position We will widen the existing road around 20 feet at the north end and taper our fill to about5 feet at the south end for a total of about 200 feeL and budd a near level pad for them tong up the crane on We will use the d1rt from the hill irnrnedJateiy north of the work to oe done 2. 3 4 What*s the legal location? What IS the durabon of the prOJed?

304

DOE F  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

420.2 420.2 All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Burden Disclosure Statement Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Records Management Division, IM-11 GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20585; and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), Washington, DC 20503. U.S. Department of Energy Personal Property Loan Agreement DOE-PMR 109-1.5103 1. CONTROL

305

DOE 11  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE A ward N o.: D E--NT0005665 Final T echnical R eport (October 2 008 - S eptember 2 012) Source c haracterization a nd t emporal variation o f m ethane s eepage f rom thermokarst l akes o n t he A laska N orth S lope in r esponse t o A rctic c limate c hange Submitted b y: University o f A laska Fairbanks, A K 9 9775 Prepared for: United S tates D epartment o f E nergy National E nergy T echnology L aboratory May 29 th 2013 Office of Fossil Energy 2 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any

306

DOE Pulse  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

go! go! home about archives subscribe Profile Dr. Isaac Gamwo (left) works with Dr. Ward Burgess (right) at the National Energy Technology Laboratory. Photo Credit: NETL. The practical application of an elite researcher's life: Isaac K. Gamwo For a man whose expertise includes reactive multiphase fluid dynamics, complex fluid properties, and chemical looping combustion processes, Dr. Isaac Gamwo is surprisingly easy to comprehend. "The research we do in this lab is not confined to the world of academia," he notes, "it has tangible impacts on the way we produce energy." As senior research chemical engineer at DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Dr. Gamwo is currently focused on complex fluid properties at high temperatures and pressures. His recent work includes

307

[an error occurred while processing this directive  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

[an error occurred while processing this directive] ... Thus, many systems administrators do not regularly update non ... works well but it does not protect ...

308

[an error occurred while processing this directive  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

[an error occurred while processing this directive] These are ... of commercial products within NIST web pages is for information only; it does not imply ...

309

DOE Information Center  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Information Center The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Center provides citizens a consolidated facility to obtain information and records related to the DOE's...

310

DOE Mentoring Program Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

our employees have fulfilling and productive careers within the Department. DOE Strategic Plan (May 2011) DOE Mentoring Program Page 2 June 2012 Table of Contents DOE...

311

DOE-STD-0100T; DOE Standard Licensed Reactor Nuclear Safety Criteria Applicable to DOE Reactors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

00T 00T November 1993 Superseding DOE/NE-0100T April 1991 DOE STANDARD LICENSED REACTOR NUCLEAR SAFETY CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO DOE REACTORS U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 AREA SAFT DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly frorn the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94005221 CONTENTS

312

Breakout Session -- TEC Direction  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

III: TEC III: TEC Direction and Priorities Presented to: Transportation External Coordination Working Group Presented by: Alex Thrower Office of Logistics Management February 7, 2008 San Antonio, Texas 2 Topics of Discussion * Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) charter and membership * Topic group functions * Meeting format 3 TEC Charter and Membership * Mission - TEC was formed in 1992 to improve coordination among the Department of Energy (DOE) and external groups interested in the Department's transportation activities The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) co-chairs TEC with DOE's Environmental Management Program Provides an opportunity for broad based input and information exchange from varied organizations - Members meet semi-annually to participate in

313

DOE FUNDAMENTALS HANDBOOK  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Electrical Science Fundamentals Handbook was developed to assist nuclear facility operating contractors provide operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff with the necessary fundamentals training to ensure a basic understanding of electrical theory, terminology, and application. The handbook includes information on alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) theory, circuits, motors, and generators; AC power and reactive components; batteries; AC and DC voltage regulators; transformers; and electrical test instruments and measuring devices. This information will provide personnel with a foundation for understanding the basic operation of various types of DOE nuclear facility electrical equipment.

unknown authors

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

314

DOE Sustainability Assistance Network (SAN) Notes, Thursday,...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Page 1 of 4 DOE Sustainability Assistance Network (SAN) Notes Thursday, November 15, 2012 1. Sustainability Performance Office Highlights Paul Estabrooks, SPO The Sustainability...

315

Living Direct: Order (2011-CE-1904)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE ordered Living Direct, Inc. to pay a $6,000 civil penalty after finding Living Direct had failed to certify that certain models of dishwashers, refrigerator-freezers and freezers comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.

316

FAQS Job Task Analyses - DOE AVIATION SAFETY OFFICER (ASO)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SAFETY OFFICER (ASO) - JOB TASK ANALYSIS SAFETY OFFICER (ASO) - JOB TASK ANALYSIS Job Analysis Worksheet for Task DOE AVIATION SAFETY OFFICER Task Source Importance Frequency A Gathers, trends, and analyzes aviation safety performance data to ensure the safety of the field aviation program. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 4 3 B Conducts periodic assessments of aviation activities to ensure that requirements, policies, and procedures are implemented and followed and prepares reports documenting assessment findings, concerns, and recommendations and tracks corrective actions to help prevent similar occurrences. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 4 3 C Participates as directed in aviation accident or incident investigations and provides assistance to accident investigation boards during their investigations.

317

DOE-HDBK-1132-99; DOE Handbook Design Considerations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32-99 32-99 April 1999 DOE HANDBOOK DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS U.S. Department of Energy AREA EDCN Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-HDBK-1132-99 TABLE OF CONTENTS PARAGRAPH PAGE iii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix FOREWORD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii PART I: DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

318

DOE-STD-1091-96; DOE Standard Firearms Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-96 1-96 February 1996 DOE STANDARD FIREARMS SAFETY U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009493 DOE-STD-1091-96 iii CONTENTS PARAGRAPH PAGE Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

319

Ecological risks of DOE`s programmatic environmental restoration alternatives  

SciTech Connect

This report assesses the ecological risks of the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Environmental Restoration Program. The assessment is programmatic in that it is directed at evaluation of the broad programmatic alternatives outlined in the DOE Implementation Plan. It attempts to (1) characterize the ecological resources present on DOE facilities, (2) describe the occurrence and importance of ecologically significant contamination at major DOE facilities, (3) evaluate the adverse ecological impacts of habitat disturbance caused by remedial activities, and (4) determine whether one or another of the programmatic alternatives is clearly ecologically superior to the others. The assessment focuses on six representative facilities: the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL); the Fernald Environmental Management Project (FEMP); the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), including the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Y-12 plant, and K-25 plant; the Rocky Flats Plant; the Hanford Reservation; and the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant.

Not Available

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

320

About DOE Green Energy  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

About DOE Green Energy Search DOE Green Energy to find publicly available bibliographic citations, technical reports and patent information on different types of renewable energy resources and energy conservation, such as solar, wind, bioenergy, hydroelectric and geothermal. For example, R&D on different types of vehicle technology, as well as studies regarding electricity and other power sources, are available. Subject areas include but are not limited to hydrogen, solar energy, tidal and wave power, energy storage, and direct energy conversion. When you search the Green Energy portal, your keyword query will be mapped to scientific concepts. This semantic technique, called "keyword to concept" mapping, is applied to your search behind the scenes and helps hone your search for more efficient knowledge access and discovery. This means that you will receive results that allow you to explore more narrow concepts, related concepts, or even broader concepts. DOE Green Energy affords you the use of the familiar and simple search box - yet still provides the benefits of an advanced search technology to help get at the information you need.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

DOE Energy Challenge Project  

SciTech Connect

Project Objectives: 1. Promote energy efficiency concepts in undergraduate and graduate education. 2. Stimulate and interest in pulp and paper industrial processes, which promote and encourage activities in the area of manufacturing design efficiency. 3. Attract both industrial and media attention. Background and executive Summary: In 1997, the Institute of Paper Science and Technology in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy developed a university design competition with an orientation to the Forest Products Industry. This university design competition is in direct alignment with DOEs interests in instilling in undergraduate education the concepts of developing energy efficient processes, minimizing waste, and providing environmental benefits and in maintaining and enhancing the economic competitiveness of the U.S. forest products industry in a global environment. The primary focus of the competition is projects, which are aligned with the existing DOE Agenda 2020 program for the industry and the lines of research being established with the colleges comprising the Pulp and Paper Education and Research Alliance (PPERA). The six design competitions were held annually for the period 1999 through 2004.

Frank Murray; Michael Schaepe

2009-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

322

JGI - DOE Bioenergy Research Centers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Bioenergy Research Centers DOE Bioenergy Research Centers DOE JGI performs sequencing on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Research Centers. The Centers are intended to accelerate basic research in the development of cellulosic ethanol and other biofuels, advancing the federal initiative that seeks to reduce U.S. gasoline consumption by 20% within 10 years through increased efficiency and diversification of clean energy sources. The three Centers are located in geographically distinct areas and use different plants both for laboratory research and for improving feedstock crops. DOE BioEnergy Science Center led by DOE's Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This center will focus on the resistance of plant fiber to breakdown into sugars and is studying the potential energy crops

323

NSNFP Activities in Support of Repository Licensing for Disposal of DOE SNF  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management is in the process of preparing the Yucca Mountain license application for submission to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as the nations first geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level waste. Because the DOE SNF will be part of the license application, there are various components of the license application that will require information relative to the DOE SNF. The National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program (NSNFP) is the organization that directs the research, development, and testing of treatment, shipment, and disposal technologies for all DOE SNF. This report documents the work activities conducted by the NSNFP and discusses the relationship between these NSNFP technical activities and the license application. A number of the NSNFP activities were performed to provide risk insights and understanding of DOE SNF disposal as well as to prepare for anticipated questions from the regulatory agency.

Henry H. Loo; Brett W.. Carlsen; Sheryl L. Morton; Larry L. Taylor; Gregg W. Wachs

2004-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

DOE HSPD-12 Card Issuance Site Performance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

13111 Y-12 Site 6881 6,881 6881 6847 6530 6463 100% 100% 95% 94% As of 3411 Kansas City Plant Honeywell Kirtland 2,667 2,667 2667 2665 2640 2601 100% 100% 99% 98% As of 3...

325

DOE Science Showcase - Carbon Capture research in DOE Databases...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Sciences Division, DOE Office of Science DOE Key R&D Programs and Initiatives, DOE DOE Fossil Energy Techline, DOE What is carbon sequestration? NETL 2010 Carbon Sequestration...

326

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA In May 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a policy in...

327

DOE Reg. Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 21, 2011 March 21, 2011 Page 1 March 21, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the Federal Register on February 3, 2011 requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. AHRI is the trade association representing manufacturers of heating, cooling, water heating, and commercial refrigeration equipment. More than 300 members strong, AHRI is an internationally recognized advocate for the industry, and develops standards for and certifies the performance of

328

Supplement to Administrator's Record of Decision on Bonneville Power Administration's Service to Direct Service Industrial (DSI) Customers for Fiscal Years 2007-2011 (DOE/EIS-0183) (05/31/06)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SUPPLEMENT TO ADMINISTRATOR'S RECORD OF DECISION ON SUPPLEMENT TO ADMINISTRATOR'S RECORD OF DECISION ON BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION'S SERVICE TO DIRECT SERVICE INDUSTRIAL (DSI) CUSTOMERS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2007-2011 ADMINISTRATOR'S RECORD OF DECISION Bonneville Power Administration U.S. Department of Energy May 31, 2006 1 Supplement to Administrator's Record of Decision on Bonneville Power Administration's Service to Direct Service Industrial (DSI) Customers for Fiscal Years 2007-2011 I. Background On February 4, 2005, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) sent a letter to customers and constituents describing a public process for comments on certain issues related to service by BPA to its remaining direct service industrial (DSI) customers that had not been finally decided in the Policy For Power Supply Role For Fiscal Years 2007-

329

DOE Privacy Steering Committee Charter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Privacy Steering Committee Charter Privacy Steering Committee Charter A. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the Department of Energy (DOE) Privacy Steering Committee (EPSC) is to advise the Senior Agency Official for Privacy (SAOP) and the Department's Privacy Program, providing recommendations to improve policies and program initiatives including breach response and notification, Privacy Impact Assessments, and other privacy matters. The EPSC is an essential component of DOE's ongoing efforts to identify processes to eliminate the unnecessary use of SSNs, and to safeguard Personally Identifiable Information (PII) while mitigating risks where the use of SSNs is authorized by a law, regulation or DOE Directive to fulfill a mission of the Department. B. AUTHORITY The EPSC is established at the direction of the Senior Agency Official for Privacy (SAOP).

330

Thermal and hydraulic performance tests of a sieve-tray direct-contact heat exchanger vaporizing pure and mixed-hydrocarbon Rankine-cycle working fluids  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Experiments investigating a sieve-tray direct-contact heat exchanger were conducted at the Raft River Geothermal Test Site in southeastern Idaho using the 60-kW Mobile Heat Cycle Research Facility operating in the thermal loop mode (without a turbine). Isobutane, propane, and several hydrocarbon mixtures were heated and boiled in the direct-contact column, which is approx. 12 in. in diameter and 19-1/2 ft. high, using the energy from a 280/sup 0/F geothermal resource. Using pure fluids, isobutane or propane, the column operated much as intended, with 17 trays used for preheating and one or two accomplishing the boiling. For the pure fluids, individual tray efficiencies were found to be 70% or higher for preheating, and close to 100% for boiling; column pinch points were projected to be well under 1/sup 0/F with some runs reaching values as low as approx. 0.02/sup 0/F. Maximum geofluid throughputs for the isobutane tests corresponded roughly to the terminal rise velocity of a 1/32 in. working fluid droplet in geofluid. Boiling was found to occur in as many as 12 trays for the mixtures having the highest concentrations of the minor component, with overall efficiencies in the boiling section estimated on the order of 25 or 30%. Preheating tray efficiencies appeared to be fairly independent of working fluid, with pinch points ranging from as low as approx. 0.03/sup 0/F for a 0.95 isobutane/0.05 hexane mixture to approx. 2.3/sup 0/F for a 0.85 isobutane/0.05 hexane mixture. Column operation was noticeably less stable for the mixtures than for the pure fluids, with maximum throughputs dropping to as low as 40 to 50% of those for the pure fluids.

Mines, G.L.; Demuth, O.J.; Wiggins, D.J.

1983-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Performance Assessment Scoping - Hanford Example  

Performance Assessment Scoping - Hanford Example Linda Suttora Office of Environmental Compliance DOE-HQ Waste Processing Technical Exchange 2010

332

DOE LLW classification rationale  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report was about the rationale which the US Department of Energy had with low-level radioactive waste (LLW) classification. It is based on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's classification system. DOE site operators met to review the qualifications and characteristics of the classification systems. They evaluated performance objectives, developed waste classification tables, and compiled dose limits on the waste. A goal of the LLW classification system was to allow each disposal site the freedom to develop limits to radionuclide inventories and concentrations according to its own site-specific characteristics. This goal was achieved with the adoption of a performance objectives system based on a performance assessment, with site-specific environmental conditions and engineered disposal systems.

Flores, A.Y.

1991-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

333

DOE LLW classification rationale  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report was about the rationale which the US Department of Energy had with low-level radioactive waste (LLW) classification. It is based on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s classification system. DOE site operators met to review the qualifications and characteristics of the classification systems. They evaluated performance objectives, developed waste classification tables, and compiled dose limits on the waste. A goal of the LLW classification system was to allow each disposal site the freedom to develop limits to radionuclide inventories and concentrations according to its own site-specific characteristics. This goal was achieved with the adoption of a performance objectives system based on a performance assessment, with site-specific environmental conditions and engineered disposal systems.

Flores, A.Y.

1991-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

334

DOE/EA-1261 Rev.  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1 1 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Riverton, Wyoming, Uranium Mill Tailings Site Final September 1998 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13 -96GJ87335 for the U.S. Department of Energy This page intentionally left blank DOE Grand Junction Office Page iii EA of Ground Water Compliance at Riverton Final September 1998 Contents Page Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v 1.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Site Location and Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2 Site Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.0 Need for DOE Compliance Action . . . . . .

335

DOE Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review 2007 Review 2007 AWA Facility Update, High Gradient Wakefield Generation, and Future Upgrades Manoel Conde, Sergey Antipov, Felipe Franchini, Wei Gai, Feng Gao, Chunguang Jing, Richard Konecny, Wanming Liu, Jidong Long, John Power, Haitao Wang, Zikri Yusof Argonne Wakefield Accelerator Group High Energy Physics Division April 25 - 27, 2007 2 Outline Description of AWA Facililty. Wakefield structures built and tested. Measurements and simulations. List of next experiments to be performed. Plans for Facility upgrades. 3 AWA Drive Beamline Drive Gun Linac & Steering Coils Quads Wakefield Structure Experimental Chambers 4.5 m GV GV YAG1 YAG2 Spectrometer YAG5 Dump/ Faraday Cup Slits YAG4 YAG3 ICT1 ICT2 BPM Single bunch operation - Q=1-100 nC - Energy=15 MeV - High Current = 10 kAmp

336

Laboratory Directed Research and Development FY 2000  

SciTech Connect

The Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab or LBNL) is a multi-program national research facility operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy (DOE). As an integral element of DOE's National Laboratory System, Berkeley Lab supports DOE's missions in fundamental science, energy resources, and environmental quality. Berkeley Lab programs advance four distinct goals for DOE and the nation: (1) To perform leading multidisciplinary research in the computing sciences, physical sciences, energy sciences, biosciences, and general sciences in a manner that ensures employee and public safety and protection of the environment. (2) To develop and operate unique national experimental facilities for qualified investigators. (3) To educate and train future generations of scientists and engineers to promote national science and education goals. (4) To transfer knowledge and technological innovations and to foster productive relationships among Berkeley Lab's research programs, universities, and industry in order to promote national economic competitiveness. Annual report on Laboratory Directed Research and Development for FY2000.

Hansen, Todd; Levy, Karin

2001-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

337

Laboratory Directed Research and Development FY 2000  

SciTech Connect

The Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab or LBNL) is a multi-program national research facility operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy (DOE). As an integral element of DOE's National Laboratory System, Berkeley Lab supports DOE's missions in fundamental science, energy resources, and environmental quality. Berkeley Lab programs advance four distinct goals for DOE and the nation: (1) To perform leading multidisciplinary research in the computing sciences, physical sciences, energy sciences, biosciences, and general sciences in a manner that ensures employee and public safety and protection of the environment. (2) To develop and operate unique national experimental facilities for qualified investigators. (3) To educate and train future generations of scientists and engineers to promote national science and education goals. (4) To transfer knowledge and technological innovations and to foster productive relationships among Berkeley Lab's research programs, universities, and industry in order to promote national economic competitiveness. Annual report on Laboratory Directed Research and Development for FY2000.

Hansen, Todd; Levy, Karin

2001-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

338

Supplement to Administrator's Record of Decision on Bonneville Power Administration's Service to Direct Service Industrial (DSI) Customers for Fiscal Years 2007-2011 (DOE/EIS-0183) (06/19/06)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

266 Federal Register 266 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices Education, Room 5C141, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202. [FR Doc. 06-5528 Filed 6-16-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-M DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Bonneville Power Administration Supplement to Administrator's Record of Decision on Bonneville Power Administration's Service to Direct Service Industrial (DSI) Customers for Fiscal Years 2007-2011 AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of final policy. SUMMARY: BPA Administrator Stephen J. Wright signed a supplement to the Administrator's Record of Decision (ROD) on Bonneville Power Administration's Service to Direct Service Industrial (DSI) Customers for Fiscal Years 2007-2011. The original

339

EIS-0450: DOE Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0450: DOE Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement TransWest Express 600 kV Direct...

340

Microsoft Word - DOE-ID-INL-12-015.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

direction of Waste Generator Services (WGS). DOE-ID NEPA CX DETERMINATION IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY Page 2 of 2 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-12-015 Releasing Contaminants - The...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

DOE Roadmap: Chapter 3  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3. Human Radiation Experiments Associated With DOE and Its Predecessors 3. Human Radiation Experiments Associated With DOE and Its Predecessors Introduction This section contains a listing, description, and selected references for documented human radiation experiments sponsored, supported, or performed by the Department of Energy or its predecessors. The list represents work completed by the Office of Human Radiation Experiments through December 1994, and is a work in progress. Additional experiments will be added as they are identified, documented, and confirmed. The experiment list is available on the Internet and will be updated over time. This list includes experiments released at Secretary O'Leary's June 1994 press conference, as well as additional studies identified during the six months that followed. Cross-references are provided for experiments originally released at the press conference. Some of the 48 experiments released in June 1994 are not listed here, as continuing research is necessary. In the interest of assembling the most comprehensive information possible, a list of experiments described in the 1986 congressional report entitled American Nuclear Guinea Pigs: Three Decades of Radiation Experiments on U.S. Citizens is provided as an appendix. It should be noted that information about some studies in American Nuclear Guinea Pigs has been updated and included in the current DOE list; further update efforts are ongoing.

342

DOE Research and Development Accomplishments QR Code  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

including URLs that can direct users to websites. The QR code for access to DOE R&D Accomplishments is available on this web page. Top Some links on this page may take...

343

Agenda for 2013 DOE Earth Week Celebrations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

regarding any of these events may be directed to Beverly Whitehead, Office of Sustainability Support, at (202) 586-6073 or Beverly.Whitehead@hq.doe.gov; or Kristina Wheeler,...

344

DOE-STD-1063-97; DOE Standard Establishing and Maintaining a Facility Representative Program at DOE Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-97 3-97 October 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1063-93 DOE STANDARD ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE PROGRAM AT DOE FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA FACR Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE98001286 DOE-STD-1063-97 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy standard is approved for use by all DOE Components.

345

DOE-HDBK-1114-98  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE-HDBK-1114-98: Guide to Good Practices for Line and Training Manager Activities Superseding DOE-STD-1056-93 (February 1993) The purpose of this guide is to provide direction for line and training managers in carrying out their responsibilities for training and qualifying assigned personnel and to verify that existing training activities are effective.

346

High-Performance Corrosion-Resistant Materials: Iron-Based Amorphous-Metal Thermal-Spray Coatings: SAM HPCRM Program ? FY04 Annual Report ? Rev. 0 - DARPA DSO & DOE OCRWM Co-Sponsored Advanced Materials Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The multi-institutional High Performance Corrosion Resistant Materials (HPCRM) Team is cosponsored by the Defense Advanced Projects Agency (DARPA) Defense Science Office (DSO) and the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM), and has developed new corrosion-resistant, iron-based amorphous metals that can be applied as coatings with advanced thermal spray technology. Two compositions have corrosion resistance superior to wrought nickel-based Alloy C-22 (UNS No. N06022) in very aggressive environments, including concentrated calcium-chloride brines at elevated temperature. Corrosion costs the Department of Defense billions of dollars every year, with an immense quantity of material in various structures undergoing corrosion. For example, in addition to fluid and seawater piping, ballast tanks, and propulsions systems, approximately 345 million square feet of structure aboard naval ships and crafts require costly corrosion control measures. The use of advanced corrosion-resistant materials to prevent the continuous degradation of this massive surface area would be extremely beneficial. The Fe-based corrosion-resistant, amorphous-metal coatings under development may prove of importance for applications on ships. Such coatings could be used as an 'integral drip shield' on spent fuel containers, as well as protective coatings that could be applied over welds, thereby preventing exposure to environments that might cause stress corrosion cracking. In the future, such new high-performance iron-based materials could be substituted for more-expensive nickel-based alloys, thereby enabling a reduction in the $58-billion life cycle cost for the long-term storage of the Nation's spent nuclear fuel by tens of percent.

Farmer, J; Haslam, J; Wong, F; Ji, S; Day, S; Branagan, D; Marshall, M; Meacham, B; Buffa, E; Blue, C; Rivard, J; Beardsley, M; Buffa, E; Blue, C; Rivard, J; Beardsley, M; Weaver, D; Aprigliano, L; Kohler, L; Bayles, R; Lemieux, E; Wolejsza, T; Martin, F; Yang, N; Lucadamo, G; Perepezko, J; Hildal, K; Kaufman, L; Heuer, A; Ernst, F; Michal, G; Kahn, H; Lavernia, E

2007-09-19T23:59:59.000Z

347

DOE-1 USERS GUIDE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

systems, etc. b. c. Run DOE-Ion each building design.ECONOMICS (It is assumed that DOE-l has already been run onthe baseline costs). vi. Run DOE-l vii. ECONOMICS report E03

Authors, Various

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

DOE News Release - DOE Completes Hydrogen/CNG Blended Fuels Performanc...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4, 2004 DOE Completes HydrogenCNG Blended Fuels Performance and Emissions Vehicle Testing The U.S. Department of Energy, through its Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity, has...

349

DOE M 483.1-1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Approved: 1-12-01 Approved: 1-12-01 Sunset Review: 1-12-03 Expiration: 1-12-05 DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS MANUAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Science and Technology Policy Analysis DISTRIBUTION: INITIATED BY: All Departmental Elements Office of Science and Technology Policy Analysis DOE M 483.1-1 DOE M 483.1-1 i (and ii) 1-12-01 DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS MANUAL 1. PURPOSE. This Manual provides detailed requirements to supplement DOE O 483.1, DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, dated 1- 12-01, which establishes requirements for the performance of technology transfer through the use of Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs). 2. REFERENCE. DOE O 483.1, DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND

350

FY 2009 Annual Performance Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AnnuAl PerformAnce rePort Working to Save the Planet DOE/CF-0044 CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 Mission ...........................................................................................................................................2 Message from the Secretary ...........................................................................................................3 Performance Background...............................................................................................................5 High Priority Performance Goals ...................................................................................................7

351

DOE-HDBK-1028-2009 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2009 Human Performance Improvement Handbook Volume 1 of 2 This Human Performance Improvement Handbook is a reference for anyone working in the Department of Energy (DOE)...

352

Notes from the October 14, 2010 DOE Fugitive Emissions Working...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(SPO) then presented on the Role of Fugitive Emissions and FEWG in DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan: * The Sustainability Performance Office (SPO) will be staffed...

353

Researching DOE Records  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy (DOE) welcomes researchers interested in documenting the Department's history. Significant portions of DOE's records, including declassified materials on the nuclear...

354

Formatting paragraph numbering for directives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 440.1-8 12-27-06 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE for use with 10 CFR PART 851 WORKER SAFETY AND HEALTH PROGRAM [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: www.directives.doe.gov Office of Health, Safety and Security DOE G 440.1-8 i (and ii) 12-27-06 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is available for use by all DOE components and their contractors. Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, and deletions) and pertinent data that may

355

Improving DOE Recruitment and Hiring Processes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF ALL DEPARTMENTAL ELEMEI\lTS MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF ALL DEPARTMENTAL ELEMEI\lTS HUMAI\l RESOURCES DIRECTORS FROM: MICHAELC. KANE~~~ CHIEF HUMAN CAPITAL ~ c· SUBJECT: IMPROVING DOE RECRUITMENT AND HIRING PROCESSES This is a follow-up to the Deputy Secretary's Memorandum dated October 6, 2010 where he communicated the need to implement the Action Plan developed to improve the recruitment and hiring processes throughout the Department. One of the central tenets of the President's reform efforts and the Department's Action Plan is management's commitment and attention to an efficient and effective hiring process that yields quality employees. This was clearly articulated in the President's Memorandum dated May 11, 2010 where he directed that management be held accountable through the performance evaluation system for their role

356

EERE: Sustainability Performance Office Home Page  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

hard hats talking among multiple rows of photovoltaic arrays. News DOE Releases 2011 Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan October 31, 2011 DOE Releases Strategic...

357

DOE Roadmap: Chapter 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Chapter 1. Overview of the DOE Project Chapter 1. Overview of the DOE Project Introduction On April 10, 1945, medical staff of the U.S. Manhattan Engineer District in Oak Ridge, TN, injected plutonium into the victim of a car accident. American scientists had only recently begun producing plutonium, and thousands of workers were laboring to produce the quantities required for the first atomic bombs. While aware that plutonium was hazardous, project officials were uncertain how much exposure would cause harm. Desire for information about human metabolism and retention of plutonium led to this first injection in Oak Ridge. Over the next 2 years, 17 other people also received plutonium injections. The Manhattan Project and its postwar successor, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), also carried out human experiments with uranium, polonium, americium, and other radioactive substances. Radiation tests continued after the war; some of these studies took place under AEC supervision and had direct defense-related applications. The agency also sponsored substantial programs in the medical applications of radiation and in basic biomedical research. In addition, independent physicians and researchers at universities and hospitals conducted many postwar human radiation studies to develop the techniques of present-day nuclear medicine.

358

DOE-EERC jointly sponsored research program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Cooperative Agreement DE-FC21-93MC30098 funded through the Office of Fossil Energy and administered at the Federal Energy Technology Center (FETC) supported the performance of a Jointly Sponsored Research Program (JSRP) at the Energy and Environmental Research Center (EERC) with a minimum 50% nonfederal cost share to assist industry in commercializing and effectively applying efficient, nonpolluting energy technologies that can compete effectively in meeting market demands for clean fuels, chemical feedstocks, and electricity in the 21st century. The objective of the JSRP was to advance the deployment of advanced technologies for improving energy efficiency and environmental performance through jointly sponsored research on topics that would not be adequately addressed by the private sector alone. Examples of such topics include the barriers to hot-gas cleaning impeding the deployment of high-efficiency power systems and the search for practical means for sequestering CO{sub 2} generated by fossil fuel combustion. The selection of particular research projects was guided by a combination of DOE priorities and market needs, as provided by the requirement for joint venture funding approved both by DOE and the private sector sponsor. The research addressed many different energy resource and related environmental problems, with emphasis directed toward the EERC's historic lead mission in low-rank coals (LRCs), which represent approximately half of the U.S. coal resources in the conterminous states, much larger potential resources in Alaska, and a major part of the energy base in the former U.S.S.R., East Central Europe, and the Pacific Rim. The Base and JSRP agreements were tailored to the growing awareness of critical environmental issues, including water supply and quality, air toxics (e.g., mercury), fine respirable particulate matter (PM{sub 2.5}), and the goal of zero net CO{sub 2} emissions.

Hendrikson, J.G.; Sondreal, E.A.

1999-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

DOE-HDBK-1203-97  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE-HDBK-1203-97: Guide to Good Practices for Training of Technical Staff and Managers Supersedes DOE-STD-1008-92 July 1992 Training programs at Department of Energy (DOE) facilities should prepare personnel to safely and efficiently operate the facilities in accordance with DOE requirements. This guide contains information that can be used to develop or validate training programs for technical staff and managers at DOE nuclear facilities. Training programs based on the content of this guide should provide assurance that these personnel perform their jobs safely and competently.

360

To: Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

'J| 'J| MaryBeth Zinmerman 0212212001 10:37 AM ',U To: Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE cc: Nancy Jeffery/EE/DOE@DOE Subject: Old Chpt 2, new Chap 3 Can you work on answering the editor's questions on this? Forwarded by MaryBeth Zimmenman/EE/DOE on 22/2001 10:36 AM "'"- . . Michael York 02/21/2001 01:13 PM To: commcoll@aol.com cc: MaryBeth Zimmerman/EE/DOE@DOE Subject: Chapter 2 Joan, attached is the first chapter to edit. We will be sending you the next chapter as soon as it is available. If you have any questions, please call me at (202) 586-5669. Thanks! Michael York Chapter 2_Energy Impacts_2.16.01.d 22894 DOE024-0300 JOEL RUBIN 02/22/2001 03:00 PM To: Marybeth Zimmerman cc: Nancy Jeffery, Darrell Beschen/EE/DOE@DOE, Michael York Subject Chapter 2 Updates MBZ - This draft incorporates (in blue ink) updates based upon the comments from Joan. Ive deleted Joan's

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

JM to Revise DOE O 150.1, Continuity Programs  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The revision will bring DOE O 150.1 into compliance with mandatory Department of Homeland Security (DHS) directives published since the Order was issued in ...

2013-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

362

DOE-STD-1037-93 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

enhance understanding of, and provide direction for, Operations Aspects of Facility Chemistry and Unique Processes, Chapter XIII of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5480.19,...

363

DOE Shipment Activities: What We Accomplished and a Look Forward  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

* Depleted Uranium Oxide (DUO) from Portsmouth and Paducah 6 7 DOE Manual 460.2-1 * Manuals are being eliminated from Directives System * Requirements from Manual will be...

364

Lodging | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Email: ffigermantown@baywoodhotels.com Located directly across from the Department of Energy (DOE) (walking distance). Equipped with: Complimentary High-Speed Internet,...

365

Hydrogen Safety Knowledge Tools - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Hydrogen Incident Reporting and Lessons Learned * Collect information and share lessons...

366

Modular Pebble-Bed Reactor Project: Laboratory-Directed Research and Development Program FY 2002 Annual Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the results of our research in FY-02 on pebble-bed reactor technology under our Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) project entitled the Modular Pebble-Bed Reactor. The MPBR is an advanced reactor concept that can meet the energy and environmental needs of future generations under DOEs Generation IV initiative. Our work is focused in three areas: neutronics, core design and fuel cycle; reactor safety and thermal hydraulics; and fuel performance.

Petti, David Andrew; Dolan, Thomas James; Miller, Gregory Kent; Moore, Richard Leroy; Terry, William Knox; Ougouag, Abderrafi Mohammed-El-Ami; Oh, Chang H; Gougar, Hans D

2002-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY2004  

SciTech Connect

The Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab or LBNL) is a multi-program national research facility operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy (DOE). As an integral element of DOE's National Laboratory System, Berkeley Lab supports DOE's missions in fundamental science, energy resources, and environmental quality. Berkeley Lab programs advance four distinct goals for DOE and the nation: (1) To perform leading multidisciplinary research in the computing sciences, physical sciences, energy sciences, biosciences, and general sciences in a manner that ensures employee and public safety and protection of the environment. (2) To develop and operate unique national experimental facilities for qualified investigators. (3) To educate and train future generations of scientists and engineers to promote national science and education goals. (4) To transfer knowledge and technological innovations and to foster productive relationships among Berkeley Lab's research programs, universities, and industry in order to promote national economic competitiveness. Berkeley Lab's research and the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program support DOE's Strategic Goals that are codified in DOE's September 2003 Strategic Plan, with a primary focus on Advancing Scientific Understanding. For that goal, the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 LDRD projects support every one of the eight strategies described in the plan. In addition, LDRD efforts support the goals of Investing in America's Energy Future (six of the fourteen strategies), Resolving the Environmental Legacy (four of the eight strategies), and Meeting National Security Challenges (unclassified fundamental research that supports stockpile safety and nonproliferation programs). The LDRD supports Office of Science strategic plans, including the 20 year Scientific Facilities Plan and the draft Office of Science Strategic Plan. The research also supports the strategic directions periodically under review by the Office of Science Program Offices, such as strategic LDRD projects germane to new research facility concepts and new fundamental science directions.

Hansen, Todd C.

2005-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

368

Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY2004  

SciTech Connect

The Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab or LBNL) is a multi-program national research facility operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy (DOE). As an integral element of DOE's National Laboratory System, Berkeley Lab supports DOE's missions in fundamental science, energy resources, and environmental quality. Berkeley Lab programs advance four distinct goals for DOE and the nation: (1) To perform leading multidisciplinary research in the computing sciences, physical sciences, energy sciences, biosciences, and general sciences in a manner that ensures employee and public safety and protection of the environment. (2) To develop and operate unique national experimental facilities for qualified investigators. (3) To educate and train future generations of scientists and engineers to promote national science and education goals. (4) To transfer knowledge and technological innovations and to foster productive relationships among Berkeley Lab's research programs, universities, and industry in order to promote national economic competitiveness. Berkeley Lab's research and the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program support DOE's Strategic Goals that are codified in DOE's September 2003 Strategic Plan, with a primary focus on Advancing Scientific Understanding. For that goal, the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 LDRD projects support every one of the eight strategies described in the plan. In addition, LDRD efforts support the goals of Investing in America's Energy Future (six of the fourteen strategies), Resolving the Environmental Legacy (four of the eight strategies), and Meeting National Security Challenges (unclassified fundamental research that supports stockpile safety and nonproliferation programs). The LDRD supports Office of Science strategic plans, including the 20 year Scientific Facilities Plan and the draft Office of Science Strategic Plan. The research also supports the strategic directions periodically under review by the Office of Science Program Offices, such as strategic LDRD projects germane to new research facility concepts and new fundamental science directions.

Hansen, Todd C.

2005-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

369

DOE LM/GJ596  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LM/GJ596 LM/GJ596 2004 - - U.S. Department of Energy Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan for the Boiling Nuclear Superheater (BONUS) Reactor Facility, Rincón, Puerto Rico May 2005 Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. DE-AC01-02GJ79491 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Office of Legacy Management Office of Legacy Management Office of Legacy Management Office of Legacy Management S0109100 DOE-LM/GJ596-2004 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan for the Boiling Nuclear Superheater (BONUS) Reactor Facility Rincón, Puerto Rico May 2005 Work Performed by S.M. Stoller Corporation under DOE Contract No. DE-AC01-02GJ79491 for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Grand Junction, Colorado

370

DOE-HDBK-1078-94; DOE Handbook Training Program Handbook: A Systematic Approach to Training  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-1078-94 August 1994 Supercedes DOE-STD-0102T, TAP-2 DOE HANDBOOK TRAINING PROGRAM HANDBOOK: A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO TRAINING U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615)576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703)487-4650. Order No. DE94018722 DOE-HDBK-1078-94 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook, DOE-HDBK-1078-94, Training Program

371

DOE-STD-3003-2000; Backup Power Sources for DOE Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-3003-2000 January 2000 Superseding DOE-STD-3003-94 September 1994 DOE STANDARD BACKUP POWER SOURCES FOR DOE FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA EDCN Washington, D.C. 20858 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. METRIC This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3003-2000 iii FOREWORD 1. This Standard is approved for use by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). This

372

Does plant richness influence animal richness? the mammals of Catalonia (NE Spain)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

B.A. & Porter, E.E. (2003) Does herbivore diversity depend247252 BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH Does plant richness influencenot directly causal. This does not mean that plants do not

Hawkins, Bradford A.; Pausas, J G

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

Direct-Cooled Power Electronics Substrate  

SciTech Connect

The goal of the Direct-Cooled Power Electronics Substrate project is to reduce the size and weight of the heat sink for power electronics used in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). The concept proposed in this project was to develop an innovative power electronics mounting structure, model it, and perform both thermal and mechanical finite-element analysis (FEA). This concept involved integrating cooling channels within the direct-bonded copper (DBC) substrate and strategically locating these channels underneath the power electronic devices. This arrangement would then be directly cooled by water-ethylene glycol (WEG), essentially eliminating the conventional heat sink and associated heat flow path. The concept was evaluated to determine its manufacturability, its compatibility with WEG, and the potential to reduce size and weight while directly cooling the DBC and associated electronics with a coolant temperature of 105 C. This concept does not provide direct cooling to the electronics, only direct cooling inside the DBC substrate itself. These designs will take into account issues such as containment of the fluid (separation from the electronics) and synergy with the whole power inverter design architecture. In FY 2008, mechanical modeling of substrate and inverter core designs as well as thermal and mechanical stress FEA modeling of the substrate designs was performed, along with research into manufacturing capabilities and methods that will support the substrate designs. In FY 2009, a preferred design(s) will be fabricated and laboratory validation testing will be completed. In FY 2010, based on the previous years laboratory testing, the mechanical design will be modified and the next generation will be built and tested in an operating inverter prototype.

Wiles, R.; Ayers, C.; Wereszczak, A.

2008-12-23T23:59:59.000Z

374

Galvin Electricity Initiative DOE RFI DOE RFI 2010-23251: Addressing Policy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Galvin Electricity Initiative DOE RFI DOE RFI 2010-23251: Galvin Electricity Initiative DOE RFI DOE RFI 2010-23251: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Galvin Electricity Initiative DOE RFI DOE RFI 2010-23251: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation The Galvin Electricity Initiative, a non-profit organization, has dedicated its resources to researching and developing both prototypes and policy reforms that demonstrate the art of the possible in terms of grid performance. Galvin Electricity Initiative DOE RFI DOE RFI 2010-23251: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation More Documents & Publications ABB Response to Smart Grid RFI. November 1, 2010 Comments of Santiago Grijalva: High-Level Response to DOE RFI on Smart Grid

375

DOE standard: The Department of Energy Laboratory Accreditation Program for radiobioassay  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This technical standard describes the US Department of Energy Laboratory Accreditation Program (DOELAP) for Radiobioassay, for use by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and DOE Contractor radiobioassay programs. This standard is intended to be used in conjunction with the general administrative technical standard that describes the overall DOELAP accreditation process--DOE-STD-1111-98, Department of Energy Laboratory Accreditation Program Administration. This technical standard pertains to radiobioassay service laboratories that provide either direct or indirect (in vivo or in vitro) radiobioassay measurements in support of internal dosimetry programs at DOE facilities or for DOE and DOE contractors. Similar technical standards have been developed for other DOELAP dosimetry programs. This program consists of providing an accreditation to DOE radiobioassay programs based on successful completion of a performance-testing process and an on-site evaluation by technical experts. This standard describes the technical requirements and processes specific to the DOELAP Radiobioassay Accreditation Program as required by 10 CFR 835 and as specified generically in DOE-STD-1111-98.

NONE

1998-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205851.800.dial.DOE en DOE-STD-1150-2013 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-1150-2013 doe-std-1150-2013" class="title-link">DOE-STD-1150-2013

377

DOE-STD-1065-94; DOE Standard Guideline to Good Practices For Postmaintenance Testing at DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

65-94 65-94 June 1994 DOE STANDARD GUIDELINE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR POSTMAINTENANCE TESTING AT DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MNTY Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94014953 DOE-STD-1065-94 FOREWORD The purpose of the Guide to Good Practices for Postm aintenance T esting at DOE Nuclear Facilities is to provide contractor maintenance

378

DOE-STD-1068-94; DOE Standard Guideline to Good Practices For Maintenance History at DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8-94 8-94 June 1994 DOE STANDARD GUIDELINE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR MAINTENANCE HISTORY AT DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MNTY Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94014950 DOE-STD-1068-94 FOREW ORD The purpose of the Guideline to Good Practices for Maintenance History at DOE Nuclear Facilities is to provide contractor maintenance organizations with information

379

DOE-STD-1055-93; DOE Standard Guideline to Good Practices For Maintenance Management Involvement at DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1055-93 March 1993 DOE STANDARD GUIDELINE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT AT DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MNTY Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. Order No. DE93013953 DOE-STD-1055-93 FOREWORD The purpose of the Guideline to Good Practices for M

380

DOE-STD-1064-94; DOE Standard Guideline to Good Practices For Seasonal Facility Preservation at DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

64-94 64-94 June 1994 DOE STANDARD GUIDELINE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR SEASONAL FACILITY PRESERVATION AT DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 AREA MNTY DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94014954 DOE-STD-1064-94 FOREWORD The Guideline to Good Practices for Seasonal Facility Preservation at DOE Nuclear Facilities provides contractor maintenance organizations with information

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

DOE-STD-1107-97; DOE Standard Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities For Key Radiation Protection Positions at DOE Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

STANDARD STANDARD KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES FOR KEY RADIATION PROTECTION POSITIONS AT DOE FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1107-97 January 1997 Reaffirmed June 2005 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE97003656 Reaffirmation with Errata DOE-HDBK-1107-97 Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities for Key Radiation Protection Positions at DOE

382

Comparisons of HVAC Simulations between EnergyPlus and DOE-2.2 for Data Centers  

SciTech Connect

This paper compares HVAC simulations between EnergyPlus and DOE-2.2 for data centers. The HVAC systems studied in the paper are packaged direct expansion air-cooled single zone systems with and without air economizer. Four climate zones are chosen for the study - San Francisco, Miami, Chicago, and Phoenix. EnergyPlus version 2.1 and DOE-2.2 version 45 are used in the annual energy simulations. The annual cooling electric consumption calculated by EnergyPlus and DOE-2.2 are reasonablely matched within a range of -0.4percent to 8.6percent. The paper also discusses sources of differences beween EnergyPlus and DOE-2.2 runs including cooling coil algorithm, performance curves, and important energy model inputs.

Hong, Tianzhen; Sartor, Dale; Mathew, Paul; Yazdanian, Mehry

2008-08-13T23:59:59.000Z

383

Guideline to good practices for control of maintenance activities at DOE nuclear facilities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Guideline to Good Practices for Control of Maintenance Activities at DOE Nuclear Facilities is to provide contractor maintenance organizations with information that may be used for the development and implementation of a rigorously controlled maintenance program directed at achieving high quality work performance, personnel safety, radiological protection, operating equipment/system protection, and overall site safety and reliability at DOE nuclear facilities. This document is intended to be an example guideline for the implementation of DOE Order 4330.4A, Maintenance Management Program, Chapter II, Element 7. DOE contractors should not feel obligated to adopt all parts of this guide. Rather, they should use the information contained herein as a guide for developing maintenance programs that are applicable to their facility.

Not Available

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

Future Directions [Irradiation Performance] - Nuclear Engineering...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Achievements Awards Patents Argonne Distinguished Fellows Professional Societies About Nuclear Energy Reactors Designed by Argonne Argonne's Nuclear Science and Technology...

385

DISCL group Performance Model Directed Data Sieving  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

--control code for a thermo- stat and a nuclear reactor. We then pass the generated automata to the HyTech model prototype--written in MATLAB. We analyzed the control code for a simple thermostat and for a nuclear reactor. The theory of hybrid automata. In Logic in Computer Science, 1996. LICS '96. Proceedings., Eleventh

Gelfond, Michael

386

DOE Lessons Learned Documents and Information  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Corporate Operating Experience Review Program Corporate Operating Experience Review Program Home Contact Us Documents & Info DOE LL Database LL Links Special Operations Reports Safety Advisories Safety Alerts Special Reports Safety Bulletins OE Summaries Just-In-Time Reports Defense Nuclear Security Lessons Learned Center (DNS-LLC) HSS Logo Corporate Operating Experience Program DOE Corporate Operating Experience (OE) Program: The Department of Energy's (DOE) corporate OE Program helps to prevent the recurrence of significant adverse events/trends by sharing performance information, lessons learned and good practices across the DOE complex. This program includes: DOE Site Performance Information, ORPS Weekly Summary of Significant Occurrences DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Collection Jump to the Lessons Learned products which make up the major sections of this web page.

387

CEMENTITIOUS BARRIERS PARTNERSHIP ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RELEVANCE TO THE DOE COMPLEX  

SciTech Connect

The Cementitious Barriers Partnership (CBP) was initiated to reduce risk and uncertainties in the performance assessments that directly impact U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) environmental cleanup and closure programs. The CBP is supported by the DOE Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) and has been specifically addressing the following critical EM program needs: (i) the long-term performance of cementitious barriers and materials in nuclear waste disposal facilities and (ii) increased understanding of contaminant transport behavior within cementitious barrier systems to support the development and deployment of adequate closure technologies. To accomplish this, the CBP has two initiatives: (1) an experimental initiative to increase understanding of changes in cementitious materials over long times (> 1000 years) over changing conditions and (2) a modeling initiative to enhance and integrate a set of computational tools validated by laboratory and field experimental data to improve understanding and prediction of the long-term performance of cementitious barriers and waste forms used in nuclear applications. In FY10, the CBP developed the initial phase of an integrated modeling tool that would serve as a screening tool which could help in making decisions concerning disposal and tank closure. The CBP experimental programs are underway to validate this tool and provide increased understanding of how CM changes over time and under changing conditions. These initial CBP products that will eventually be enhanced are anticipated to reduce the uncertainties of current methodologies for assessing cementitious barrier performance and increase the consistency and transparency of the DOE assessment process. These tools have application to low activity waste forms, high level waste tank closure, D&D and entombment of major nuclear facilities, landfill waste acceptance criteria, and in-situ grouting and immobilization of vadose zone contamination. This paper summarizes the recent work provided by the CBP to support DOE operations and regulatory compliance and the accomplishments over the past 2 years. Impacts of this work include: (1) a forum for DOE-NRC technical exchange, (2) material characterization to support PA predictions, (3) reducing uncertainty in PA predictions, (4) establishing base case performance to improve PA predictions, and (5) improving understanding and quantification of moisture and contaminant transport used in PAs. Additional CBP accomplishments include: sponsorship of a national test bed workshop to obtain collaboration in establishing the path forward in obtaining actual data to support future predictions on cementitious barrier performance evaluations, and participation in an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Cooperative Research Project on the use of cementitious barriers for low-level radioactive waste treatment and disposal.

Burns, H.; Langton, C.; Flach, G.; Kosson, D.

2010-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

388

Renewable Electrolysis Integrated Systems Development and Testing - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Kevin Harrison National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 384-7091 Email: Kevin.Harrison@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Eric Miller Phone: (202) 287-5829 Email: Eric.Miller@hq.doe.gov Contributors: Chris Ainscough and Michael Peters Subcontractor: Marc Mann, Spectrum Automation Controls, Arvada, CO Project Start Date: October 1, 2003 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Validate stack and system efficiency and contributing * sub-system performance of DOE-awarded advanced electrolysis systems Collaborate with industry to optimize and demonstrate *

389

DOE-HDBK-1105-2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Radiological Training for Tritium Facilities, Replaced by DOE-HDBK-1105-2002 | Superseding DOE-HDBK-1105-96 (December 1996) The goal of the training program is to provide a baseline knowledge for those individuals completing the training. Use of the DOE developed material provides personnel with the information necessary to perform their assigned duties at a predetermined level of expertise. Implementing the training program helps ensure consistent and appropriate training of personnel

390

DOE-STD-1111-98  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Laboratory Accreditation Program Administration Replaced by DOE-STD-1111-2013 The purpose of this technical standard is to establish procedures for administering DOELAP and acquiring accreditation. Specific performance testing requirements and site assessment criteria for accreditation are contained in: DOE-STD-1095-95, Department of Energy Laboratory Accreditation Program for Personnel Dosimetry Systems and DOE-STD-1112-98, Department of Energy Laboratory Accreditation for Radiobioassay.

391

DOE Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Receives EPA Recertification | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Receives EPA Recertification Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Receives EPA Recertification DOE Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Receives EPA Recertification March 29, 2006 - 9:42am Addthis CARLSBAD, NM - The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office today reached a significant milestone when its Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) was recertified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This decision indicates that after a thorough evaluation of the physical state and performance of the facility, the WIPP meets EPA regulatory requirements for facilities that dispose of transuranic waste. The waste facility recertification process occurs every five years and is directed by Congress in the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA). "EPA's recertification reinforces the important mission of WIPP to safely

392

DOE Mercury Control Research  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mercury Control Research Mercury Control Research Air Quality III: Mercury, Trace Elements, and Particulate Matter September 9-12, 2002 Rita A. Bajura, Director National Energy Technology Laboratory www.netl.doe.gov 169330 RAB 09/09/02 2 Potential Mercury Regulations MACT Standards * Likely high levels of Hg reduction * Compliance: 2007 Clean Power Act of 2001 * 4-contaminant control * 90% Hg reduction by 2007 Clear Skies Act of 2002 * 3-contaminant control * 46% Hg reduction by 2010 * 70% Hg reduction by 2018 * Hg emission trading President Bush Announcing Clear Skies Initiative February 14, 2002 169330 RAB 09/09/02 3 Uncertainties Mercury Control Technologies * Balance-of-plant impacts * By-product use and disposal * Capture effectiveness with low-rank coals * Confidence of performance 169330 RAB 09/09/02 4

393

DOE-STD-1070-94; DOE Standard Guidelines for Evalation of Nuclear...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

criteria for the evaluation of training programs developed to meet the requirements of DOE Orders 5480.18A and 5480.20, and other directives that address training and...

394

DOE Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Management Environmental Management Project and Contract Management Improvement Timeline Improving DOE contract and project management is a top priority of the Department's senior management and entire organization. The DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) has put in place a "Roadmap" for Journey to Excellence that sets specific performance expectations for continuous improvements in contract and project management. Following are some highlights of EM's improvement actions over the past five years. In 2006, the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) began a study of EM, which included acquisition and project management among its key focus areas. The resultant report from the study,

395

DOE New Technology: Sharing New Frontiers, April 1, 1993--September 30, 1993  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of DOE New Technology is to provide information on how to access specific technologies developed through research sponsored by DOE and performed by DOE laboratories or by DOE-contracted researchers. This document describes technologies identified as having potential for commercial applications in addition to a catalog of current patent applications and patents available for licensing from DOE and DOE contractors.

Tamura, A.T.; Henline, D.M. [eds.

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

396

Carbon Dioxide Sequestration by Direct Mineral Carbonation: Results...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sequestration by Direct Mineral Carbonation: Results from Recent Studies and Current Status W.K. OConnor (oconnor@alrc.doe.gov) D.C. Dahlin (dahlin@alrc.doe.gov) D.N Nilsen...

397

Modification Number M017 Applicable Directives (List B)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in whole or in part, and in accordance with Clause, 970.5204-78, Laws, Regulations, and DOE Directives (June 1997). ORDER DATE TITLE DOE O 130.1 092995 Budget Formulation...

398

Directional Validation of Wave Predictions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A methodology for quantitative, directional validation of a long-term wave model hindcast is described and applied. Buoy observations are used as ground truth and the method does not require the application of a parametric model or data-adaptive ...

W. Erick Rogers; David W. C. Wang

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

399

Buildings Performance Database  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Buildings Performance DOE Buildings Performance Database Paul Mathew Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory pamathew@lbl.gov (510) 486 5116 April 3, 2013 Standard Data Spec API 2 | Building Technologies Office eere.energy.gov Purpose & Objectives Problem Statement: * Large-scale high-quality empirical data on building energy performance is critical to support decision- making and increase confidence in energy efficiency investments. * While there are a many potential sources for such data,

400

SC Laboratory Appraisal Process | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

SC Laboratory SC Laboratory Appraisal Process Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2007 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2006 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Planning Process Work for Others in the Office of Science Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Technology Transfer DOE National Laboratories Contact Information Laboratory Policy and Evaluation U.S. Department of Energy SC-32/Forrestal Building

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Understanding the function and performance of carbon-enhanced lead-acid batteries : milestone report for the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (FY11 Quarter 4: July through September 2011).  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report describes the status of research being performed under CRADA No. SC10/01771.00 (Lead/Carbon Functionality in VRLA Batteries) between Sandia National Laboratories and East Penn Manufacturing, conducted for the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Storage Systems Program. The Quarter 4 Milestone was completed on time. The milestone entails the initiation of high rate, partial state of charge (HRPSoC) cycling of the carbon enhanced batteries. The morphology, porosity, and porosity distribution within the plates after 1k and 10k cycles were documented, illustrating the changes which take place in the early life of the carbon containing batteries, and as the battery approaches failure due to hard sulfation for the control battery. Longer term cycling on a subset of the received East Penn cells containing different carbons (and a control) continues, and will progress into FY12. Carbon has been explored as an addition to lead-acid battery electrodes in a number of ways. Perhaps the most notable to date has been the hybrid 'Ultrabattery' developed by CSIRO where an asymmetric carbon-based electrochemical capacitor is combined with a lead-acid battery into a single cell, dramatically improving high-rate partial-state-of-charge (HRPSoC) operation. As illustrated below, the 'Ultrabattery' is a hybrid device constructed using a traditional lead-acid battery positive plate (i.e., PbO2) and a negative electrode consisting of a carbon electrode in parallel with a lead-acid negative plate. This device exhibits a dramatically improved cycle life over traditional VRLA batteries, as well as increased charge power and charge acceptance. The 'Ultrabattery' has been produced successfully by both The Furukawa Battery Co. and East Penn Manufacturing. An example illustrating the dramatic improvement in cycle life of the Ultrabattery over a conventional VRLA battery is shown in a graph. In addition to the aforementioned hybrid device, carbon has also been added directly to traditional VRLA batteries as an admixture in both the positive and negative plates, the latter of which has been found to result in similar improvements to battery performance under high-rate partial-state-of-charge (HRPSoC) operation. It is this latter construction, where carbon is added directly to the negative active material (NAM) that is the specific incarnation being evaluated through this program. Thus, the carbon-modified (or Pb-C) battery (termed the 'Advanced' VRLA battery by East Penn Manufacturing) is a traditional VRLA battery where an additional component has been added to the negative electrode during production of the negative plate. The addition of select carbon materials to the NAM of VRLA batteries has been demonstrated to increase cycle life by an order of magnitude or more under (HRPSoC) operation. Additionally, battery capacity increases on cycling and, in fact, exceeds the performance of the batteries when new.

Ferreira, Summer Rhodes; Shane, Rodney (East Penn Manufacturing, Lyon Station, PA); Enos, David George

2011-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

Understanding the function and performance of carbon-enhanced lead-acid batteries : milestone report for the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (FY11 Quarter 4: July through September 2011).  

SciTech Connect

This report describes the status of research being performed under CRADA No. SC10/01771.00 (Lead/Carbon Functionality in VRLA Batteries) between Sandia National Laboratories and East Penn Manufacturing, conducted for the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Storage Systems Program. The Quarter 4 Milestone was completed on time. The milestone entails the initiation of high rate, partial state of charge (HRPSoC) cycling of the carbon enhanced batteries. The morphology, porosity, and porosity distribution within the plates after 1k and 10k cycles were documented, illustrating the changes which take place in the early life of the carbon containing batteries, and as the battery approaches failure due to hard sulfation for the control battery. Longer term cycling on a subset of the received East Penn cells containing different carbons (and a control) continues, and will progress into FY12. Carbon has been explored as an addition to lead-acid battery electrodes in a number of ways. Perhaps the most notable to date has been the hybrid 'Ultrabattery' developed by CSIRO where an asymmetric carbon-based electrochemical capacitor is combined with a lead-acid battery into a single cell, dramatically improving high-rate partial-state-of-charge (HRPSoC) operation. As illustrated below, the 'Ultrabattery' is a hybrid device constructed using a traditional lead-acid battery positive plate (i.e., PbO2) and a negative electrode consisting of a carbon electrode in parallel with a lead-acid negative plate. This device exhibits a dramatically improved cycle life over traditional VRLA batteries, as well as increased charge power and charge acceptance. The 'Ultrabattery' has been produced successfully by both The Furukawa Battery Co. and East Penn Manufacturing. An example illustrating the dramatic improvement in cycle life of the Ultrabattery over a conventional VRLA battery is shown in a graph. In addition to the aforementioned hybrid device, carbon has also been added directly to traditional VRLA batteries as an admixture in both the positive and negative plates, the latter of which has been found to result in similar improvements to battery performance under high-rate partial-state-of-charge (HRPSoC) operation. It is this latter construction, where carbon is added directly to the negative active material (NAM) that is the specific incarnation being evaluated through this program. Thus, the carbon-modified (or Pb-C) battery (termed the 'Advanced' VRLA battery by East Penn Manufacturing) is a traditional VRLA battery where an additional component has been added to the negative electrode during production of the negative plate. The addition of select carbon materials to the NAM of VRLA batteries has been demonstrated to increase cycle life by an order of magnitude or more under (HRPSoC) operation. Additionally, battery capacity increases on cycling and, in fact, exceeds the performance of the batteries when new.

Ferreira, Summer Rhodes; Shane, Rodney (East Penn Manufacturing, Lyon Station, PA); Enos, David George

2011-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

403

Contractor Past Performance Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2009) December 2009) 1 Contractor Performance Information Guiding Principles The primary purpose of past performance evaluations is to ensure that accurate data on contractor performance is current and available for use in source selections. A past performance evaluation report provides a record of a contractor's performance, both positive and negative, on a given contract during a specified period of time. The quality of the narrative component supporting the past performance information evaluation is critical. If the evaluator takes the time to prepare an accurate and complete report, the evaluator helps ensure better quality in the products and services DOE buys now and those DOE plans to buy in the future.

404

Submitting a Proposal to DOE | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Submitting a Proposal to DOE Submitting a Proposal to DOE Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Selecting a Host DOE Laboratory Developing a Research Proposal Recommender Information Student Participants Submitting a Proposal to DOE Application Selection Process and Notification Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Submitting a Proposal to DOE Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Through direct collaboration with research staff at DOE host laboratories, the VFP program provides an opportunity for faculty to help create innovative new capabilities and make discoveries germane to DOE science missions. Through the experience, visiting faculty members also develop integrated skills that translate to programs at their home institutions,

405

DOE-STD-7501-99; The DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7501-99 7501-99 December 1999 Superseding DOE-STD-7501-95 Including Change Notice No. 1 September 1997 DOE STANDARD THE DOE CORPORATE LESSONS LEARNED PROGRAM U.S. Department of Energy AREA MGMT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-7501-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy Technical Standard is approved for use by all DOE Components and

406

DOE-TSL-2-2002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-2002 2-2002 DOE-TSL-2-2002 September 24, 2002 Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program Replaced by DOE-TSL-2-2006 | Supersedes DOE-TSL-2-98 (January 1998) This TSL supplements DOE manuals, directives, orders, and standards. It provides basic and fundamental information for DOE Component personnel involved in identifying standardization documents. It also provides listings of points of contact within DOE and identifies links to points of contact within the Department of Defense (DoD) for coordination of standardization activities. DOE-TSL-2-2002, Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program More Documents & Publications Technical Standards, Newsletter-June 1997 DOE-TSL-1-2002 Diversity Employment and Recruitment Sources

407

DOE-STD-1107-97 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7-97 7-97 DOE-STD-1107-97 November 08,2007 DOE-STD-1107-97: Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities for Key Radiation Protection Positions at DOE Facilities Change Notice No. 1 (November 2007) This document provides detailed qualification criteria for contractor key radiation protection personnel. Although federal key radiation protection positions are also identified in Table 1, qualification standards for federal positions are provided in DOE O 360.1B, October 2001 and the DOE Technical Qualifications Program. DOE-STD-1107-97: Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities for Key Radiation Protection Positions at DOE Facilities More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-1107-97 Technical Standards, DOE Orders and Applicable CFRs/DEAR Crosswalk - February 2, 2002 Technical Standards,DOE Standards and Corresponding Directives Crosswalk -

408

The DOE Artificial Retina Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ENvisioNiNG siGht for thE BLiND ENvisioNiNG siGht for thE BLiND The DOE Artificial Retina Project Leveraging DOE expertise to enhance the quality of life for millions Major advances achieved by researchers in the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Artificial Retina Project are beginning to offer some hope to millions of people blinded by retinal diseases worldwide. In a breakthrough operation performed by project leaders at the Doheny Eye Institute (University of Southern California) in 2002, doctors threaded an electrode-studded array through an incision into the eye of a man who had been blind for 50 years and tacked it onto his damaged retina. Within weeks, the 77-year-old patient could see patterns of light and dark that allowed him to detect motion and locate and differentiate

409

Direct-Current Resistivity Survey At Hualalai Northwest Rift Area (Thomas,  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Hualalai Northwest Rift Area (Thomas, Hualalai Northwest Rift Area (Thomas, 1986) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Direct-Current Resistivity Survey At Hualalai Northwest Rift Area (Thomas, 1986) Exploration Activity Details Location Hualalai Northwest Rift Area Exploration Technique Direct-Current Resistivity Survey Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown Notes A total of seven Schlumberger soundings were performed on Hualalai. References Donald M. Thomas (1 January 1986) Geothermal Resources Assessment In Hawaii Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Direct-Current_Resistivity_Survey_At_Hualalai_Northwest_Rift_Area_(Thomas,_1986)&oldid=510528" Category: Exploration Activities What links here Related changes

410

DOE Mentoring Program Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

If you are interested in continuous learning and self-development, the DOE Mentoring Program is for you. This guide will provide you with general information regarding mentoring at DOE. Learning...

411

DOE MENTOR-PROTG  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

goal , 52% small business subcontracting goal, and statutory socio-economic goals 2 HISTORY OF DOE MENTOR-PROTG PROGRAM June 9, 1995 The DOE Mentor Protg Program Initiative...

412

DOE MENTOR-PROTG  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

goal, 52% small business subcontracting goal, and statutory socio-economic goal 2 HISTORY OF DOE MENTOR-PROTG PROGRAM June 9, 1995 The DOE Mentor Protg Program Initiative...

413

DOE Federal Quality Council  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Federal Quality Council Note: Membership can be updated without re-approval of the Charter Name Org. Location Email Phone Colette Broussard HSS GTN colette.broussard@hq.doe.gov...

414

DOE Data Explorer  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DDE Discovering data and non-text information in the Department of Energy DOE Data Explorer What's New About DDE DOE Data Centers OSTI's Data ID Service Featured Collection...

415

Completed DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Completed) Completed) Project Number Title Document ID SLM / ORG Author / Phone / Email Status / Review Date P1020-2002REV National Phenomena hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for DOE Facilities DOE-STD-1020-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30) P1066-1999REV Fire Protection and Emergency Services Program and Design Criteria (revision to DOE-STD-1066-99) DOE-STD-1066-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30)

416

DOE/NNSA  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... 1 Kansas City Plant DOE/NNSA Product Tolerance Representation ... Way Forward: Progress Shared Agendas Mandates NNSA (KCP) ...

2012-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

417

FY 2011 DOE Agency Financial Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Provides key financial and performance information that demonstrates DOE's accountability to ensure Americas security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental, and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions.

418

Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-3020-2005 DOE-STD-3020-2005 December 2005 Supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FOREWARD This U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. This standard was developed primarily for application in DOE programs. It provides guidance to DOE contractors for procurement and required testing of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters used in DOE nuclear facilities. Required testing is performed by the filter manufacturer and

419

Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-3020-2005 DOE-STD-3020-2005 December 2005 Supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FOREWARD This U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. This standard was developed primarily for application in DOE programs. It provides guidance to DOE contractors for procurement and required testing of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters used in DOE nuclear facilities. Required testing is performed by the filter manufacturer and

420

DOE/WIPP-13-3507  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE/WIPP-13-3507 DOE/WIPP-13-3507 2 This page intentionally left blank Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2012 DOE/WIPP-13-3507 3 2012 Annual Site Environmental Report To our readers: This Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Annual Site Environmental Report for 2012 presents summary environmental data to (1) characterize site environmental management performance; (2) summarize environmental occurrences and responses reported during the calendar year; (3) confirm compliance with environmental standards and requirements; and (4) highlight the WIPP Environmental Management System (EMS), significant environmental programs, and accomplishments, including progress toward U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Sustainability Goals.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

DOE-STD-1020-2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for Department of Energy Facilities Supersedes DOE-STD-1020-2002 This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard (STD)-1020-2012, Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for DOE Facilities, provides criteria and guidance for the analysis and design of facility structures, systems, and components (SSCs) that are necessary to implement the requirements of DOE Order (O) 420.1C, Facility Safety, and to ensure that the SSCs will be able to effectively perform their intended safety functions under the effects of natural phenomena hazards (NPHs).

422

DOE 2008 Occupational Radiation Exposure October 2009  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A major priority of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is to ensure the health, safety, and security of DOE employees, contractors, and subcontractors. The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) provides the corporate-level leadership and strategic vision necessary to better coordinate and integrate health, safety, environment, security, enforcement, and independent oversight programs. One function that supports this mission is the DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program that provides collection, analysis, and dissemination of performance indicators, such as occupational radiation exposure information. This analysis supports corporate decision-making and synthesizes operational information to support continuous environment, safety, and health improvement across the DOE complex.

U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Health, Safety and Security

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

DOE-STD-1067; DOE Standard Guideline to Good Practices for Maintenance Facilities, Equipment, and Tools at DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7-94 7-94 June 1994 DOE STANDARD GUIDELINE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, AND TOOLS AT DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MNTY Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703)487-4650. Order No. DE94014952 DOE-STD-1067-94 FOREW ORD The Guideline to Good Practices for Maintenance Facilities, Equipment, and Tools at

424

DOE-STD-1072-94; DOE Standard Guideline to Good Practices for Facility Condition Inspections at DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-94 2-94 June 1994 DOE STANDARD GUIDELINE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR FACILITY CONDITION INSPECTIONS AT DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 AREA MNTY DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94014948 DOE-STD-1072-94 iii FOREWORD The purpose of the Guideline to Good Practices for Facility Condition Inspections

425

DOE-HDBK-3012-96  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Guide to Good Practices For Operational Readiness Reviews Replaced by DOE-STD-3006-2000 | SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-94 (September 1994) This guidance section provides instructions, explanations and examples for the performance of all phases of an Operational Readiness Review (ORR). Details pertinent to the Team Leader (TL), Team Members (TM) and Review Coordinator (RC) are outlined. An appendix contains sample forms and correspondence which are typically used to initiate and perform the ORR.

426

Final Report to DOE  

SciTech Connect

This final report summarizes the accomplished goals and provide a list of the publications and presentations made during the project. The goals of the project were accomplished through the various publications submitted to Journals and presentations done at the DOE and international meetings and conferences. The 8 journal articles related to the goals of this project were accepted or submitted. The 23 presentations related to goals of the project were presented at the meetings. There were some minor changes regarding to project goals because of issues encountered during the analysis of the data. For example, a total water probe sensor mounted on the Convair-580 that can be used for defining mixed phase conditions and parameterization, had some problems to estimate magnitude of total water mass, and this resulted in issues providing an accurate parameterization for cloud fraction. Variability related aerosol number concentrations and their composition for direct and indirect effects were studied and published. Results were given to explain aerosol and ice microphysical effects on climate change studies. It is suggested that developed parameterizations should consider the variability in aerosol and ice parameters over the Arctic regions.

Ismail Gultepe

2012-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

427

Direct-Current Resistivity Survey At Beowawe Hot Springs Area...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Activity Details Location Beowawe Hot Springs Area Exploration Technique Direct-Current Resistivity Survey Activity Date Usefulness useful DOE-funding Unknown References Sabodh...

428

Direct-Current Resistivity Survey At Mauna Loa Northeast Rift...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Details Location Mauna Loa Northeast Rift Area Exploration Technique Direct-Current Resistivity Survey Activity Date Usefulness useful DOE-funding Unknown Notes The vertical...

429

DOE Philosophy on LDRD | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

DOE's Philosophy on LDRD DOE's Philosophy on LDRD Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process Laboratory Planning Process Work for Others in the Office of Science Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) DOE's Philosophy on LDRD Frequently Asked Questions Success Stories Brochures Additional Information LDRD Program Contacts Technology Transfer DOE National Laboratories Contact Information Laboratory Policy and Evaluation U.S. Department of Energy SC-32/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5447 F: (202) 586-3119 Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) DOE's Philosophy on LDRD Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Department of Energy's Engine of Discovery

430

DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements March 16, 2010 - 4:28pm...

431

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18, 2013...

432

DOE ISM CHAMPIONS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9/27/12 9/27/12 DOE ISM CHAMPIONS Organization Points of Contact Phone E-mail DOE ISM Co- Champion (HSS) Pat Worthington (301) 903-5926 pat.worthington@hq.doe.gov DOE ISM Co- Champion (EM) Ray Corey (509) 376-0108 ray_j_corey@rl.gov Ames Cindy Baebler (630) 252-1563 cynthia.baebler@ch.doe.gov Argonne Joanna M. Livengood (630) 252-2366 joanna.livengood@ch.doe.gov Brookhaven Bob Desmarais (631) 344-5434 rdesmarais@bnl.gov CBFO Josef A. Sobieraj (575) 234-7499 Josef.sobieraj@wipp.ws CDNS Don F. Nichols (202) 586-8216 don.nichols@nnsa.doe.gov Chicago Justin Zamirowski (630) 252-2248 justin.zamirowski@ch.doe.gov CNS-Energy Chip Lagdon (301) 903-4218 (202) 586-0799 chip.lagdon@hq.doe.gov EE Gary Staffo (202) 586-9577 gary.staffo@ee.doe.gov EM James A. Hutton (202) 586-0975 james.hutton@em.doe.gov

433

DOE Information Center  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Information Center DOE Information Center The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Center provides citizens a consolidated facility to obtain information and records related to the DOE's various programs in Oak Ridge and abroad. Employees at the DOE Information Center are available to assist with your requests and searches from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EST), Monday through Friday, except for federal holidays. Requests Documents can be requested in person or by telephone, email, or fax. Reproduction Please allow DOE Information Center staff adequate time to reproduce documents. Some material requires special handling, security reviews, etc. Delivery Unless special arrangements have been made with DOE Information Center staff, documents should be picked up during normal business hours.

434

DOE Patents Database - FAQ's  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Why was this database developed and by whom? How is this collection different than the one at the United States Patent and Trademark Office? What are the criteria for including patent records in this collection? How do you determine these patents were sponsored by DOE? How many patents are in this collection? Does the collection include all of DOE's patents? Does this collection include the full text for each patent? What time frame is covered by DOepatents? How often is this collection and Web site updated? Does the U.S. Government have exclusive rights to these inventions? What is OSTI? Where can I find information about doing business with DOE? How can I find additional information on the patenting process? Where can I find patents that are not related to DOE?

435

DOE O 442.1A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

442.1A 442.1A 6-6-01 THIS PAGE IS TO REMAIN WITH DOE O 442.1A THIS PAGE TRANSMITS AN ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE TO DOE O 442.1, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAM, DATED 2-1-99. THIS PAGE ALSO CANCELS DOE O 442.1 AND REISSUES IT AS DOE O 442.1A, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAM, DATED 6-6-01. THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE THAT OCCURRED WAS TO BRING THIS DIRECTIVE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. Distribution: Initiated By: All Departmental Elements Office Economic Impact and Diversity Office of Employee Concerns DOE O 442.1A Approved: 6-6-01 U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAM 1. OBJECTIVE. As a service to all Departmental Elements, the following will be to establish a

436

Soladigm DOE Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect

Soladigm's research has produced a fundamental improvement in the technology for dynamic windows by successfully transitioning a low-cost, high-performance dynamic glass fabrication process from a simple 2" research prototype into a full-scale manufacturing environment capable of producing commercial dynamic insulated glass units (IGUs), and developing and optimizing the production process to meet all specifications for mass commercial production. The technology developed under this project is a revolutionary process for fabricating electrochromic glass that today exceeds DOE's 2020 performance and reliability targets at a compelling consumer price point. Before this project, we had demonstrated 2" prototypes using our deposition process that met these performance targets. The goal of this project was to prove that we could transition this lab-scale process to a scalable, "inline" manufacturing process, leveraging existing manufacturing tools capable of achieving a commercially attractive pricepoint in the near-term. Under this project we demonstrated the technical effectiveness of our manufacturing process by achieving or exceeding all of our technical and performance targets for inline fabrication of electrochromic IGUs. These performance specifications exceed DOE's 2020 performance and reliability targets. We also demonstrated the economic feasibility of our manufacturing process by reaching an initial production process that will achieve our target costs, which are compatible with mass adoption.

None

2011-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

437

DOE Office of Indian Energy Foundational Course on Direct Use...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Biomass Heat - Resources, Technology, Examples & Cost, and References Geothermal Building Heat - Resources, Technology, Examples & Cost, and References ...

438

``Clean`` fuels: Does the new direction make environmental sense?  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This paper examines the ramifications of this a three-pronged energy philosophy, with special reference to its expected environmental impact if it is fully implemented as policy. To recapitulate, the three prongs are to rely on a free energy market to determine winners and losers, which could certainly include Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) if it remains relatively cheap and clean; refocus the bulk of government-sponsored transportation energy research toward a ``great leap ahead`` to fully renewable and essentially pollution-free fuels such as hydrogen and fuel cells; and discontinue AFV pump priming. Of special interest is a premise that appears common to all prongs--that none of these measures represents a retreat from environmental goals or accomplishments on record since the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 was passed.

Saricks, C.L.; Wang, M.Q.

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

NETL: News Release -DOE-Funded Technology Improves Directional...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Energy-funded technology has demonstrated the capability to dramatically reduce costs and improve safety and efficiency in drilling America's oil and natural gas wells....

440

Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 - DOE HSPD-12 Implementati...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Office of Health, Safety and Security HSS Logo Department of Energy Seal Left Tab SEARCH Right Tab TOOLS Right Tab Left Tab HOME Right Tab Left Tab ABOUT US Right Tab Left Tab...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

DNFSB Review Coordination - DOE Directives Workshop April 2007  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and implementation of the standards relating to the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of defense nuclear facilities of the Department of Energy (including all...

442

Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the "best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact" at cooling water intake structures. The Second Circuit held that EPA may not engage in cost-benefit...

443

Paper on "Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the "best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact" at cooling water intake structures. The Second Circuit held that EPA may not engage in cost-benefit...

444

DOE Office of Indian Energy Foundational Course on Direct Use...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

cafeterias, laundries, and hotels. An example of residential space heating would be solar heating of water for a home boiler, or a hydronic heat system. High temperature solar can...

445

DOE Fire Protection Handbook, Volume I  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) Fire Protection Program is delineated in a number of source documents including; the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), DOE Policy Statements and Orders, DOE and national consensus standards (such as those promulgated by the National Fire Protection Association), and supplementary guidance, This Handbook is intended to bring together in one location as much of this material as possible to facilitate understanding and ease of use. The applicability of any of these directives to individual Maintenance and Operating Contractors or to given facilities and operations is governed by existing contracts. Questions regarding applicability should be directed to the DOE Authority Having Jurisdiction for fire safety. The information provided within includes copies of those DOE directives that are directly applicable to the implementation of a comprehensive fire protection program. They are delineated in the Table of Contents. The items marked with an asterisk (*) are included on the disks in WordPerfect 5.1 format, with the filename noted below. The items marked with double asterisks are provided as hard copies as well as on the disk. For those using MAC disks, the files are in Wordperfect 2.1 for MAC.

NONE

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

446

DOE Sustainability Assistance Network (SAN) Notes, Thursday,...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan (SSPP) will begin as soon as the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) directions for its completion are available. 2. Savannah River...

447

Direct Use for Building Heat and Hot Water Presentation Slides and Text Version  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Download presentation slides from the DOE Office of Indian Energy webinar on direct use for building heat and hot water.

448

Chapter 22 - Direct Loans and Loan Guarantees  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8-31-11 8-31-11 22-1 CHAPTER 22 DIRECT LOANS AND LOAN GUARANTEES 1. PURPOSE. This chapter establishes the Department of Energy (DOE) accounting policy and procedures for direct loans and loan guarantees for non-Federal borrowers. 2. APPLICABILITY. a. Departmental Applicability. The applicability of this chapter is specified in Chapter 1, "Accounting Overview." b. DOE Contractors. This chapter does not apply to contractors. 3. REQUIREMENTS. a. Federal Credit Reform Act. The policies and procedures for credit programs reflect the requirements of the "Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (FCRA)," as amended. The FCRA is found

449

DOE-TSL-2-2002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-2002 2-2002 DOE-TSL-2-2002 September 24, 2002 Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program Replaced by DOE-TSL-2-2006 | Supersedes DOE-TSL-2-98 (January 1998) This TSL supplements DOE manuals, directives, orders, and standards. It provides basic and fundamental information for DOE Component personnel involved in identifying standardization documents. It also provides listings of points of contact within DOE and identifies links to points of contact within the Department of Defense (DoD) for coordination of standardization activities. DOE-TSL-2-2002, Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter- April 2008

450

DOE-STD-1066-99; Fire Protection Design Criteria  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-99 6-99 July 1999 Superseding DOE-STD-1066-97 DOE STANDARD FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN CRITERIA U.S. Department of Energy AREA FIRP Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1066-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard is approved for use by all DOE elements and their contractors. DOE Standards are part of the DOE Directives System and are issued to provide supplemental

451

Memorandum, Principles Governing Departmental Directives - September 10,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Principles Governing Departmental Directives - Principles Governing Departmental Directives - September 10, 2007 Memorandum, Principles Governing Departmental Directives - September 10, 2007 September 10, 2007 The Department of Energy uses directives as its primary means to establish, communicate, and institutionalize policies, requirements, and procedures for Departmental Elements and, in some instances, our contractors. The Department of Energy uses directives as its primary means to establish, communicate, and institutionalize policies, requirements, and procedures for Departmental Elements and, in some instances, our contractors. Directives help ensure that the Department operates in a safe, secure, efficient, and cost-effective manner. They promote operational consistency throughout the DOE complex, foster sound management, and

452

Search Results from DOE Databases  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Climate Modeling Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D...

453

Major DOE Biofuels Project Locations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(St. Joseph, MO) Abengoa Biochemica Agricultural Residue (Hugoton, KS) DOE Joint Bioenergy Institute (Berkeley, CA) DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (Madison, WI) DOE...

454

DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program - Library  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Library DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program DOELAP Regulatory Basis 10 CFR 835.402, Individual Monitoring, as amended DOELAP Program Administration DOE-STD 1111-98, DOE Laboratory...

455

DOE-STD-1077-94; DOE Standard Training Accreditation Program Standard: Requirements and Guidelines  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7-94 7-94 August 1994 Supercedes DOE-STD-0101T, TAP-1, and DOE-STD-0103T, TAP-3 DOE STANDARD TRAINING ACCREDITATION PROGRAM STANDARD: REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 FSC 6910 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94018723 DOE-STD-1077-94 FOREWORD The Training Accreditation Program was established by the Department of Energy

456

DOE-STD-1070-94; DOE Standard Guidelines for Evalation of Nuclear Facility Training Programs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-1070-94 June 1994 DOE STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION OF NUCLEAR FACILITY TRAINING PROGRAMS U.S. Department of Energy FSC-6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615)576-8401. Available to the public from the U. S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA. 22161; (703)487-4650. Order No. DE94015536 DOE-STD-1070-94 iii FOREWORD The Department of Energy (DOE) Guidelines for Evaluation of Nuclear Facility Training

457

DOE-STD-3006-95; DOE Standard Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3006-95 3006-95 November 1995 SUPERSEDING DOE-STD-3006-93 November 1993 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-3006-95 i PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) FOREWORD 1. DOE 0 425.1 establishes the requirement to conduct Operational Readiness Reviews

458

DOE-STD-1030-95; DOE Standard Guide to Good Practices For Lockouts and Tagouts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1030-96 1030-96 May 1996 Supercedes DOE-STD-1030-92 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR LOCKOUTS AND TAGOUTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009465 DOE-STD-1030-96 iii FOREWORD The purpose of this Guide to Good Practices is to provide Department of Energy (DOE) contractors with information that can be used to validate and/or modify existing programs

459

DOE-STD-1075-94; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5-94 5-94 July 1994 DOE STANDARD STANDARD FOR DEVELOPING AND ISSUING DOE SAFETY GUIDES AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDES U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94018438 DOE-STD-1075-94 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) standard was prepared by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health with the assistance of James E. Konklin of

460

DOE technical standards list: Directory of points of contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Department of Energy (DOE) technical standards list (TSL) has been prepared by the Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards (EH-31). This TSL is approved for use by all DOE Components (i.e., all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories). This TSL supplements DOE manuals, directives, orders, and standards. It provides basic and fundamental information for DOE Component personnel involved in identifying standardization documents. It also provides listings of points of contact within DOE and identifies links to points of contact within the Department of Defense (DoD) for coordination of standardization activities. This TSL will be updated to reflect changes in organizations, addresses, and responsibilities as necessary.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Laboratory Directed Research and Development FY-10 Annual Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The FY 2010 Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Annual Report is a compendium of the diverse research performed to develop and ensure the INL's technical capabilities can support the future DOE missions and national research priorities. LDRD is essential to the INL -- it provides a means for the laboratory to pursue novel scientific and engineering research in areas that are deemed too basic or risky for programmatic investments. This research enhances technical capabilities at the laboratory, providing scientific and engineering staff with opportunities for skill building and partnership development.

Dena Tomchak

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 460.1C Packaging and Transportation Safety and DOE O 460.2A Departmental Materials Transportation and Packaging Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

60.1C 60.1C PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY DOE O 460.2A DEPARTMENTAL MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION AND PACKAGING MANAGEMENT DOE O 460.1C and 460.2A Familiar Level June 2011 1 DOE O 460.1C PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY DOE O 460.2A DEPARTMENTAL MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION AND PACKAGING MANAGEMENT FAMILIAR LEVEL _________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to perform the following: 1. What are the objectives of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) O 460.1C? 2. What is the DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) exemption process in DOE O 460.1C? 3. What are the onsite safety requirements specified by DOE O 460.1C? 4. What are the objectives of DOE O 460.2A?

463

DOE Science Showcase - Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases Search Results from DOE Databases View research documents, citations, accomplishments, patents, and projects related to climate change, one of the primary scientific challenges addressed through the Incite Program. Climate Change Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Climate Modeling Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Ocean Turbulence and Climate Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Cloud Simulation and Models Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Global Warming Information Bridge Energy Citations Database

464

Direct conversion technology  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The overall objective of the Direct Conversion Technology task is to develop an experimentally verified technology base for promising direct conversion systems that have potential application for energy conservation in the end-use sectors. This report contains progress of research on the Alkali Metal Thermal-to-Electric Converter (AMTEC) and on the Two-Phase Liquid-Metal MHD Electrical Generator (LMMHD) for the period January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991. Research on AMTEC and on LMMHD was initiated during October 1987. Reports prepared on previous occasions (Refs. 1--5) contain descriptive and performance discussions of the following direct conversion concepts: thermoelectric, pyroelectric, thermionic, thermophotovoltaic, thermoacoustic, thermomagnetic, thermoelastic (Nitionol heat engine); and also, more complete descriptive discussions of AMTEC and LMMHD systems.

Massier, P.F.; Back, L.H.; Ryan, M.A.; Fabris, G.

1992-01-07T23:59:59.000Z

465

DOE handbook electrical safety  

SciTech Connect

Electrical Safety Handbook presents the Department of Energy (DOE) safety standards for DOE field offices or facilities involved in the use of electrical energy. It has been prepared to provide a uniform set of electrical safety guidance and information for DOE installations to effect a reduction or elimination of risks associated with the use of electrical energy. The objectives of this handbook are to enhance electrical safety awareness and mitigate electrical hazards to employees, the public, and the environment.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Principles Governing Departmental Directives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

efficient, and cost-effective manner. They promote operational consistency throughout the DOE complex, foster sound management, and facilitate achievement of DOE'S strategic goals....

467

DOE Hydrogen Analysis Repository: Cost Analysis of Proton Exchange Membrane  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cost Analysis of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Systems for Cost Analysis of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Systems for Transportation Project Summary Full Title: Cost Analysis of Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Systems for Transportation Project ID: 196 Principal Investigator: Eric Carlson Keywords: Fuel cells, fuel cell vehicles (FCV), transportation, costs Purpose Assess the cost of an 80 kW direct hydrogen fuel cell system relative to the DOE 2005 target of $125/kW. The system includes the fuel cell stack and balance-of-plant (BOP) components for water, thermal, and fuel management, but not hydrogen storage. Performer Principal Investigator: Eric Carlson Organization: TIAX, LLC Address: 15 Acorn Park Cambridge, MA 02140-2328 Telephone: 617-498-5903 Email: carlson.e@tiaxllc.com Additional Performers: P. Kopf, TIAX, LLC; J. Sinha, TIAX, LLC; S. Sriramulu, TIAX, LLC

468

DOE Corporate Overview - 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy, 2012 Section One, page 1 U.S. Department of Energy, 2012 Section One, page 1 SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Welcome to the Department of Energy. This book provides an overview of the Department of Energy (DOE). The opening sections describe the mission areas, organizational structure and upcoming critical issues of the Department, followed by brief descriptions of DOE's goals and programs. Later sections provide overviews of the Department's budget, staffing, contract management, project management, Congressional jurisdiction, Government Accountability Office (GAO) and DOE's Inspector General (IG) oversight and DOE high-visibility

469

JGI - DOE Mission Relevance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

User Programs User Programs Project Management Office Community Science Program Emerging Technologies Opportunity Program Technology Development Pilot Program Genomic Encyc. of Bacteria and Archaea MyJGI: Information for Collaborators DOE Mission Relevance CSP | Overview | How to Propose a Project | Review Process | DOE Relevance Proposal Schedule | FAQ The Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (DOE JGI) is managed by the Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research (OBER) to produce high-throughput DNA sequencing and analysis in support of its missions in alternative energy, global carbon cycling, and biogeochemistry. These areas mirror DOE and national priorities to develop abundant sources of clean energy, to control greenhouse gas accumulation in

470

DOE Glass Publications Portal  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

coated glass products. The Glass IOF is sponsored by the Department of Energy (DOE) Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Industrial Technologies Program (ITP) which...

471

DOE Science Showcase - Nanotechnology  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

valuable way to spotlight needs and target resources in this critical area of science and technology. Nanotechnology Research Results in DOE Databases DOepatents ScienceCinema...

472

DOE G 414  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initial Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes, Memorandum to Linton Brooks, Defense Programs and Jessie Hill Roberson, Office of Environmental Management, March 28, 2003. DOE-STD-3009-94,...

473

2012 DOE Sustainability Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2012 DOE Sustainability Awards PSO Site Title EE National Renewable Energy Laboratory Comprehensive Energy Management EM Headquarters - EM Environmental Management's Sustainability...

474

JGI - DOE Sequencing Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Sequencing Projects For status information, see the Genome Projects section Organism Est. Genome Size Branchiostoma floridae (Florida lancelet) 600 Mb Chlamydomonas reinhardtii...

475

DOE/ID-Number  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

hole assembly BOPE blow-out prevention equipment BRC Blue Ribbon Commission BWR boiling water reactor CSH calcium-silicate-hydrate DBD deep borehole disposal DOE Department of...

476

DOE Green Energy  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

A SCIENCE Accelerator Resource Search the DOE Green Energy knowledge base: Search Search Behind the scenes, your keyword query will be mapped to related scientific concepts. This...

477

DOE - Fossil Energy:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Trends Button National Security Button Safety and Health Button DOE Office of Fossil Energy Web Site Fossil Energy - Clean Coal Technologies - Carbon Capture,...

478

Attached PARTICIPANTS: NRC DOE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will provide a walk-through of its license application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain,

unknown authors

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

479

DOE Coordination Meeting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the formation of a Safety Review Panel, by 2004; * Integrate safety procedures into all DOE project funding procurements. This will ensure that all projects that involve the...

480

DOE Sustainability Assistance Network (SAN) Notes Thursday, July...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2012 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan (SSPP) was sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) in June. The 2012...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "doe directives performance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a