Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

PEER REVIEW PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect

The Institute for Regulatory Science (RS) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) jointly estab lished a peer-review program. As the program evolved, four types of review were established. A process for stakeholder participation in peer review eetings was also developed. While a committee established by the ASME provided oversight to the peer-review process, the RSI managed the day-to-day operations of peer review panels. In addition to the reports resulting from peer review of specific projects, several documents were prepared to facilitate the review process, all of which were widely distributed.

MOGHISSI, A ALAN; LOVE, BETTY R; STRAJA, SORIN R

2007-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

2

Radioactive Waste Isolation in Salt: Peer review of documents dealing with geophysical investigations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Salt Repository Project, a US Department of Energy program to develop a mined repository in salt for high-level radioactive waste, is governed by a complex and sometimes inconsistent array of laws, administrative regulations, guidelines, and position papers. In conducting multidisciplinary peer reviews of contractor documents in support of this project, Argonne National Laboratory has needed to inform its expert reviewers of these governmental mandates, with particular emphasis on the relationship between issues and the technical work undertaken. This report acquaints peer review panelists with the regulatory framework as it affects their reviews of site characterization plans and related documents, including surface-based and underground test plans. Panelists will be asked to consider repository performance objectives and issues as they judge the adequacy of proposed geophysical testing. All site-specific discussions relate to the Deaf Smith County site in Texas, which was approved for site characterization by the President in May 1986. Natural processes active at the Deaf Smith County site and the status of geophysical testing near the site are reviewed briefly. 25 refs., 4 figs., 5 tabs.

McGinnis, L.D.; Bowen, R.H.

1987-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

3

MELCOR Peer Review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code that models the progression of severe accidents in light water reactor nuclear power plants. The newest version of MELCOR is Version 1.8.1, July 1991. MELCOR development has reached the point that the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission sponsored a broad technical review by recognized experts to determine or confirm the technical adequacy of the code for the serious and complex analyses it is expected to perform. For this purpose, an eight-member MELCOR Peer Review Committee was organized. The Committee has completed its review of the MELCOR code: the review process and findings of the MELCOR Peer Review Committee are documented in this report. The Committee has determined that recommendations in five areas are appropriate: (1) MELCOR numerics, (2) models missing from MELCOR Version 1.8.1, (3) existing MELCOR models needing revision, (4) the need for expanded MELCOR assessment, and (5) documentation.

Boyack, B.E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Dhir, V.K. [Santa Monica, CA. (United States); Gieseke, J.A. [Battelle, Columbus, OH (United States); Haste, T.J. [AEA Technology, Winfrith (United Kingdom); Kenton, M.A. [Gabor, Kenton and Associates, Inc., Westmont, IL (United States); Khatib-Rahbar, M. [Energy Research, Inc., Rockville, MD (United States); Leonard, M.T. [Science Applications International Corp., Wolfheze (Netherlands); Viskanta, R. [Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN (United States). Heat Transfer Lab.

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

4

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rulemaking Rulemaking Peer Review Report - Supporting Documentation Submitted Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy March 2007 Table of Contents PROJECT ABSTRACTS ................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................ 16 SLIDE PRESENTATIONS ON JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .................................................. 104 PEER REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM.................................................................. 201 PEER REVIEW AGENDA JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .........................................................

5

Building Technologies Program: Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program: Peer Review on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Program: Peer Review on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Program: Peer Review on Delicious Rank Building...

6

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review - Sept, 2007 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III...

7

CONTAIN independent peer review  

SciTech Connect

The CONTAIN code was developed by Sandia National Laboratories under the sponsorship of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to provide integrated analyses of containment phenomena. It is used to predict nuclear reactor containment loads, radiological source terms, and associated physical phenomena for a range of accident conditions encompassing both design-basis and severe accidents. The code`s targeted applications include support for containment-related experimental programs, light water and advanced light water reactor plant analysis, and analytical support for resolution of specific technical issues such as direct containment heating. The NRC decided that a broad technical review of the code should be performed by technical experts to determine its overall technical adequacy. For this purpose, a six-member CONTAIN Peer Review Committee was organized and a peer review as conducted. While the review was in progress, the NRC issued a draft ``Revised Severe Accident Code Strategy`` that incorporated revised design objectives and targeted applications for the CONTAIN code. The committee continued its effort to develop findings relative to the original NRC statement of design objectives and targeted applications. However, the revised CONTAIN design objectives and targeted applications. However, the revised CONTAIN design objectives and targeted applications were considered by the Committee in assigning priorities to the Committee`s recommendations. The Committee determined some improvements are warranted and provided recommendations in five code-related areas: (1) documentation, (2) user guidance, (3) modeling capability, (4) code assessment, and (5) technical assessment.

Boyack, B.E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Corradini, M.L. [Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States). Nuclear Engineering Dept.; Denning, R.S. [Battelle Memorial Inst., Columbus, OH (United States); Khatib-Rahbar, M. [Energy Research Inc., Rockville, MD (United States); Loyalka, S.K. [Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO (United States); Smith, P.N. [AEA Technology, Dorchester (United Kingdom). Winfrith Technology Center

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

8

EMSL: External Peer Reviewers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS Additional Information User Portal 2014 Call for Proposals 2014 Proposal Guidance 2014 Proposal Review Criteria Guidance for Letters of Intent to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call Guidance for Full Proposals to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call (Invited Only) 2014 Proposal Planning 2014 Proposal Summary/Extension Previous Calls External Peer Reviewers Fellowships and Awards Nufo, logo External peer reviewers are valuable contributors to EMSL's user proposals process. They provide objective evaluations of the quality of the proposals according to established review criteria, and participate on Review Panels that calibrate the proposals into a ranked order. EMSL is truly grateful to the researchers who donated their time and efforts in fiscal year 2012 to

9

R:\\Eco SSL\\Guidance Document\\Final Peer Review Draft Sent to...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of uncontaminated sites (Table 2-2). Logarithm of Toxicity Threshold Values N u m b e r critical review of soil criteria methods 2-6 Table 2-2. Assessment factors for...

10

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Superconducting Flywheel Development Phil Johnson FESS Program Manager Boeing Phantom Works DOE Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Superconducting Flywheel Development Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 2 Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. 50kW / 5kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Off-Grid Demo System Objective: *Design, build and deliver a flywheel energy storage system tailored for off- grid applications utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) Bearing Goal: *Successfully integrate the FESS system into a demonstration site One of three deployment options for the demo system, shown in relation to

11

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Sept , 2008 Peer Review Sept , 2008 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Superconducting Flywheel Development 2 Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Flywheel Energy Storage Systems Objective: *Design, build and deliver flywheel energy storage systems utilizing high temperature superconducting (HTS) bearings tailored for uninterruptible power systems and off-grid applications Goal: *Successfully integrate FESS into a demonstration site through cooperative agreements with DOE and contracts with Sandia National Labs Deployment of a demo system, shown in relation to diesel genset and balance of system. Over All Status:

12

2007 Annual Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2007 Annual Peer Review 2007 Annual Peer Review September 27, 2007 San Francisco, California Welcoming Remarks Imre Gyuk US Dept. of Energy DOE / ESS Program Overview (View .pdf) John Boyes Sandia National Laboratories PRESENTATIONS\ ECONOMICS - BENEFIT STUDIES Evaluating Value Propositions for Four Modular Electricity Storage Demonstrations in California (View .pdf) Jim Eyer (Distributed Utility Assoc.) Update on Benefit and Cost Comparison of Modular Energy Storage Technologies for Four Viable Value Propositions (View .pdf) Susan Schoenung (Longitude 122 West, Inc.) ECONOMICS - ENVIRONMENT BENEFITS STUDIES Emissions from Traditional & Flywheel Plants for Regulation Services (View .pdf) Rick Fioravanti (KEMA, Inc.) UTILITY & COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS

13

NETL: 2010 - Carbon Sequestration Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carbon Sequestration Peer Review Carbon Sequestration Peer Review During March 15 - 19, 2010, a total of 16 projects from NETL's Carbon Sequestration Program were peer reviewed....

14

NETL: 2013 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs NETL: 2013 - Carbon Capture Peer Review Carbon Storage Peer Review During October 22 - 26, 2012, a total of 16 projects...

15

NETL: 2011 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs Advanced Energy Systems Peer Review Advanced Energy Systems Peer Review During April 23 - 27, 2012, a total of 16 projects...

16

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review - DOE Peer Review - Sept, 2007 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Superconducting Flywheel Development 2 Flywheel Energy Storage Systems Objective: *Design, build and deliver flywheel energy storage systems utilizing high temperature superconducting (HTS) bearings tailored for uninterruptible power systems and off-grid applications Goal: *Successfully integrate FESS into a demonstration site through cooperative agreements with DOE and contracts with Sandia National Labs Deployment of a demo system, shown in relation to diesel genset and balance of system. Status: *The 1 kWh / 3 kW test was successful

17

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review 6 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The agenda and ESS program overview are available below. Day 1 morning session presentations Day 1 afternoon session presentations Day 2 morning session presentations Day 2 afternoon session presentations ESS 2006 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - ESS Program Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications

18

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Peer Review 7 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. The agenda and ESS program overview presentation are below. Presentation categories Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Program Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage

19

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

20

Peer Review 2012 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

12 Peer Review 2012 September 30, 2012 Subject: Department of Energy, Peer Review for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2012 Reviewer: Treasury Inspector General for Tax...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review 2 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations are available through the individual session links. The agenda and participant list are available below. Presentations June 12 - Day 1: Session I, Session II, Session III, Session IV, Session V June 13 - Day 2: Session VI, Session VII 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Agenda 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Participant List More Documents & Publications 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2

22

FEMP Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Panel Report Panel Report September 20-21, 2005 FEMP PEER REVIEW PANEL Paul DeCotis, Chair New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Floyd E. Barwig Iowa Energy Center Richard S. Brent Solar Turbines, Inc. Bruce Gross Dominion Federal Corporation Kenneth L. James Pacific Gas and Electric Company Meg Matt The Matt Group Richard A. Morgan Morgan Marketing Partners Francis J. Murray, Jr. Energy/Environmental Consultant Maria Papadakis James Madison University Polly N. Shaw Consultant Susan E. Stratton Energy Center of Wisconsin James J. Winebrake, Ph.D. Rochester Institute of Technology David B. Zabetakis David B. Zabetakis, LLC November 4, 2005 Mr. Rick Khan, Program Manager Federal Energy Management Program U.S. Department of Energy

23

NETL: 2011 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carbon Capture Peer Review During July 18 - 21, 2011, a total of 16 projects from NETL's Innovations for Existing Plants and Carbon Sequestration Programs were peer reviewed....

24

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review Planning  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Planning Planning Woman participating in a peer review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) begins the peer review planning process by analyzing the purpose of the funds to be distributed. Because each agency's needs are different, ORISE then designs and manages a flexible, scientific peer review process that can be modified based on a sponsor's regulatory, policy and operational requirements. ORISE's existing tools and systems, and knowledge of reviewing proposals from a government agency perspective, are helping to promote the quality and credibility of scientific information and funded research. ORISE's peer review planning process ensures each objective review is completed on schedule, within budget and with a high degree of process integrity.

25

Published Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Published Peer Reviews Published Peer Reviews Published Peer Reviews Peer Review Agenda Vehicle Technologies Annual Merit Review Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 (pdf) Peer Review Plan for influential scientific assessment entitled, "Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1." (pdf) Peer Review Plan for Highly Influential Scientific Assessment entitled, "Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications" (pdf) Peer Review Plan for Highly Influential Scientific Assessment entitled, "Synthesis and Assessment Report on Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario

26

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in

27

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to focus additional resources. Peer Reviews are intended to meet the requirements of DOE Order 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets,...

28

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer...

29

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A consensus peer review of the current technical basis and the planned experimental and modeling program for the prediction of the long-term performance of waste package materials being considered for use in a proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A Compilation of Special Topic Reports Wastepackagematerials_PPRP_final.pdf Evaluation of the Final Report: Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Panel Multi-Purpose_Canister_System_Evaluation.pdf More Documents & Publications Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion Cracking/Fatigue Modeling for Light Water

30

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews Peer Reviews SMART GRID PROGRAM 2012 Agenda and Presentations, San Diego, CA, June 7-8, 2012 2010 Agenda and Presentations, Denver, CO, November 2-4, 2010 2008 Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration Agenda, Red Bank, NJ, October 29-30, 2008 TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY 2013 Reliability & Markets Agenda and Presentations, Ithaca, NY, August 6-7, 2013 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, June 27-28, 2013 2012 Load as a Resource Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, September 20, 2012 2012 Reliability & Markets Agenda and Presentations, Ithaca, NY, August 7-8, 2012 2012 Advanced Applications Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, June 12-13, 2012 2010 Agenda and Presentations, and Final Report, Alexandria, VA,

31

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems...

32

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality...

33

An algorithm to determine peer-reviewers  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The peer-review process is the most widely accepted certification mechanism for officially accepting the written results of researchers within the scientific community. An essential component of peer-review is the identification of competent referees ... Keywords: co-authorship networks, peer-review process

Marko A. Rodriguez; Johan Bollen

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

34

PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report from the Peer Review Panel Report from the Peer Review Panel on activities within the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Team Members: Kathryn Newcomer, The George Washington University (Chair) Irwin Feller, The Pennsylvania State University (Retired) Stephanie Shipman, Government Accountability Office Kathleen Sedlak O'Brien, Environmental Protection Agency Faith Lambert, EERE Final Report February 1, 2008 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) within the U.S. Department of Energy asked a panel of experts with relevant knowledge to review the evaluation activities of the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit (PAE) within EERE's Office of Planning, Budget and

35

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

36

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

37

EERE Peer Review Guide - August 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PEER REVIEW GUIDE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Based on a Survey of Best Practices for In-Progress Peer Review Prepared by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Peer Review Task Force August 2004 EERE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Acknowledgements DOE/EERE, and the Peer Review Task Force particularly, acknowledge the generous and important contributions to this Guide of Review Panel Chairman Ronald N. Kostoff, Office of Naval Research, and expert panel members and reviewers: Greg Stover, NASA; Paul Doremus, NIST; Richard Silberglitt, Rand; Kerry L. Dearfield, EPA; Jim Cassatt, NIH; Daryl Chubin, NACME; Fiona Wood, Australia; Frans van den Beemt, Netherlands; Larry James, DOE; and David Tratt, NASA. Notice This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States

38

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW FINAL REPORT  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT 22106 Background Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) signed a cooperative agreement with DOE on 93004 to develop a novel gasifier concept, which...

39

ENERGY REVIEW Consultation Document  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENERGY REVIEW Consultation Document JANUARY 2006 Our Energy Challenge Securing clean, affordable energy for the long-term #12;Our Energy Challenge Securing clean, affordable energy for the long term #12;OUR ENERGY CHALLENGE ­ SECURING CLEAN, AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR THE LONG TERM ii Why is the government

40

Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review With mounting evidence suggesting an increased probability that malicious attacks may be launched against energy control systems, there is a critical need to understand specific cyber vulnerabilities and corresponding mitigation strategies. This need is being addressed by SCADA/ Energy Management System (EMS) Cyber Security Assessments conducted at the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) facility at INL and at on-site field installations of control systems. Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review More Documents & Publications DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan DOE National SCADA Test Bed Program Multi-Year Plan Vulnerability Analysis of Energy Delivery Control Systems - 2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Conservation Standards Rulemaking Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report Prepared Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy February 2007 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 4 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 6 2. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................... 6 3. SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 7

42

Convergent contemporary software peer review practices  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Software peer review is practiced on a diverse set of software projects that have drastically different settings, cultures, incentive systems, and time pressures. In an effort to characterize and understand these differences we examine two Google-led ... Keywords: Empirical Software Engineering, Inspection, Open source software, Peer code review, Software firms

Peter C. Rigby; Christian Bird

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

43

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on...

44

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The...

45

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Peer Review Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum...

46

NETL: 2010 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (AIGCC) Peer Review Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (AIGCC)...

47

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Home Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...

48

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University...

49

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Economics Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Economics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Economics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September...

50

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the...

51

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems...

52

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AgendaPresentation List Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - AgendaPresentation List The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power...

53

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National...

54

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage...

55

2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available 2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis...

56

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis...

57

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

These reports summarize the comments of expert peer reviewers at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, where each year projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells...

58

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 -...

59

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 -...

60

Document Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Document Reviews Document Reviews Document Reviews The Office of Document Reviews, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security information and document declassification efforts promote the release of information needed by an informed citizenry to understand and oversee the actions of its Government. To meet our mission requirements, the Office of Document Reviews: Conducts pre-publication reviews of documents generated in classified subject areas at Headquarters that are to be released to the public. Conducts document reviews for other HSS and Headquarters organizations to identify classified and controlled unclassified information. Reviews classified documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act for the Department and denies the release of the document in total or provides a redacted copy for release to the requester.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_SAR.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

a Peer Review of a "Synthesis and Assessment Report on a Peer Review of a "Synthesis and Assessment Report on Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario Development and Application" Pursuant to Section V of the "Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under the authority of the Information Quality Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-554), the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) announces a plan for a peer review of its Synthesis and Assessment Report 2.1 entitled "Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario Development and Application" The CCSP (see http://www.climatescience.gov for details) integrates federal

62

SSC Safety Review Document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The safety strategy of the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) Central Design Group (CDG) is to mitigate potential hazards to personnel, as far as possible, through appropriate measures in the design and engineering of the facility. The Safety Review Document identifies, on the basis of the Conceptual Design Report (CDR) and related studies, potential hazards inherent in the SSC project independent of its site. Mitigative measures in the design of facilities and in the structuring of laboratory operations are described for each of the hazards identified.

Toohig, T.E. [ed.

1988-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

63

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW FINAL REPORT  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT 2/21/06 Background Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) signed a cooperative agreement with DOE on 9/30/04 to develop a novel gasifier concept, which is expected to improve the availability and efficiency of gasification-based power plants, and to reduce plant capital and operations costs. On 12/21/05, PWR submitted a proposal to continue development of their gasifier into the next phase. On January 24, 2006, a peer review was performed to review the work that PWR has done to date, their technical approach for future development, and to assess the potential benefit of the PWR gasifier and feed system technologies over state-of-the art coal gasification. The peer reviewers also evaluated a DOE analysis of the PWR refractory, and a DOE system study comparing the

64

Position paper - peer review and design verification of selected activities  

SciTech Connect

Position Paper to develop and document a position on the performance of independent peer reviews on selected design and analysis components of the Title I (preliminary) and Title II (detailed) design phases of the Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility project.

Stine, M.D.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

65

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_CCSP.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Peer Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program the Peer Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Report entitled 'Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications' Pursuant to Section V of the "Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under the authority of the Information Quality Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-554), the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) announces a plan for the peer review of its Synthesis and Assessment Report entitled 'Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications'. The CCSP is an interagency research, planning, and coordinating entity that integrates federal research on climate and global change, as sponsored by thirteen federal agencies and overseen by the Office of Science and Technology

66

Energy Storage Systems 2005 Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on October 20, 2005 in San Francisco, CA. The agenda and ESS program overview presentation are below.

67

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentati...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Electronics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer...

68

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2010 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held June 7-11, 2010 in Washington, D.C.

Not Available

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

69

Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications 23 August 2013 Oklahoma Biological Survey, ES Bridge and WF Frick. In Review. Energetics of and Abundant Aerial Insectivore: The Purple Martin aeroecology: exploring the movements of aerial fauna through radio-wave remote sensing. Biology Letters 8: 698

Kelly, Jeff

70

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. The full presentations are available below. Presentation summaries are also available. 2012 R&M Peer Review - Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs 2012 R&M Peer Review - Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch - Pravin Varaiya 2012 R&M Peer Review - Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman 2012 R&M Peer Review - Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework - Hsiao-Dong Chiang 2012 R&M Peer Review - Essence of Structure Preserving Network Reductions -

71

Energy Storage Systems 2009 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 Peer Review 09 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2009 Peer Review The DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted an annual peer review in Seattle, WA on October 8, 2009. The 1-day conference included welcoming remarks from OE's Imre Gyuk as well as a program overview from John Boyes of Sandia National Laboratories and 11 presentations on individual projects. The agenda, program overview, and project presentations are available below. ESS 2009 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - DOE-ESS Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Long Island Bus NaS Battery Energy Storage Project - Steve Eckroad, EPRI.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Development of an Integrated Power Controller Based on HT SOI and SiC - Joseph Henfling, SNL.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Large Format Carbon Enhanced VRLA Battery Test

72

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Ray Byrne, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - National Assessment of Energy Storage for Grid Balancing and Arbitrage - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-EPRI Energy Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA - Abbas Akhil, SNL More Documents & Publications

73

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Ray Byrne, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - National Assessment of Energy Storage for Grid Balancing and Arbitrage - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-EPRI Energy Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA - Abbas Akhil, SNL More Documents & Publications

74

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer reviewed by qualified specialists before it is disseminated by the federal government. We published a proposed Bulletin on September 15, 2003. Based on public comments, we published a revised proposal for additional comment on April 28, 2004. We are now finalizing the April version, with minor revisions responsive to the public's comments. The purpose of the Bulletin is to enhance the quality and credibility of the government's scientific information. We recognize that different types of peer review are appropriate for different types of information. Under this Bulletin, agencies are granted broad

75

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon 6 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Energy Storage and Wyoming Wind Power - Mindi Farber de Anda, SAIC.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Hybrid Generation Simulator - David Trujillo, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Modular Energy Storage Benefit and Cost for Three Emerging Value Propositions - Susan Schoenung, Longitude 122 West.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Sprint - Kevin Kenny.pdf

76

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning 6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 morning session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - EESAT 2007 Conference Information - Georgianne Peek, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Ultracapacitor EnergyBridge UPS - Chris McKay, Northern Power.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Flywheel-based Frequency Regulation Demonstration Projects - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Design of the FESS 20MW Frequency Regulation Plant -

77

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 1 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Laboratory Scale FACTS Conroller Development - Mariesa Crow, U Missouri, Rolla.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - 100kW Low Cost Energy Storage Inverter - Larry Rinehart, Rinehart Motions.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - ETO Light Power Converter for FACTS & Energy Storage Applications - Alex Huang, NCSU.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-based Power Converter

78

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Converters - Marcelo Schupbach, APEI.pdf ESPE 2008 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-Based Power Converter System - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf ESPE 2008 Peer Review - SiC Power...

79

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applications - Alex Huang, NCSU.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-based Power Converter System - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Optically...

80

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United Silicon Carbide ESS 2012 Peer Review - 15 kV Phase Leg Power Modules with SiC Devices - Ranbir Singh, GeneSiC Semiconductor ESS 2012 Peer Review - Experimental...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage...

82

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted...

83

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Day 1, Session 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update...

84

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports on Facebook Tweet about...

85

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4,...

86

FINAL REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REPORT REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL FEBRUARY 28, 2002 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. Signature Page Preface Executive Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Organization of the Peer Review 1.2 Objectives of the Review 1.3 Content of the Final Report 2. MAIN FINDINGS 2.1 Perspective 2.2 Overall Findings 2.3 Corrosion Degradation Modes 2.4 Higher or Lower Temperature Operating Modes 2.5 Long-Term Uniform Corrosion of Passive Metal 2.6 Alloy Specification and Comparison 2.7 Technical Issues to be Resolved 2.8 Organizational-Managerial Issues 3. SUMMARY OF DEGRADATION MODES AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Repository Conditions: Overview of Time, Temperature, Environment

87

How important tasks are performed: peer review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The advancement of various fields of science depends on the actions of individual scientists via the peer review process. The referees' work patterns and stochastic nature of decision making both relate to the particular features of refereeing and to the universal aspects of human behavior. Here, we show that the time a referee takes to write a report on a scientific manuscript depends on the final verdict. The data is compared to a model, where the review takes place in an ongoing competition of completing an important composite task with a large number of concurrent ones - a Deadline -effect. In peer review human decision making and task completion combine both long-range predictability and stochastic variation due to a large degree of ever-changing external "friction".

Hartonen, T; 10.1038/srep01679

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

88

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Presentation Summaries |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review - Presentation Summaries Review - Presentation Summaries 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Presentation Summaries The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentation summaries are available below. The full presentations are also available. 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Transmission Investment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch - Pravin Varaiya 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework - Hsiao-Dong Chiang 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Essence of Structure Preserving Network

89

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 afternoon 2 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Energy Storage and Wyoming Wind Power - Mindi Farber de Anda, SAIC.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Hybrid Generation Simulator - David Trujillo, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Modular Energy Storage Benefit and Cost for Three Emerging Value Propositions - Susan Schoenung, Longitude 122 West.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Sprint - Kevin Kenny.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Emerson Network Power - Paul Misar.pdf

90

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 morning 1 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 1 morning session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - NAS Battery Performance at Charleston, WV - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Evaluation of the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative System for Energy Storage Potential - Abbas Akhil, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Plant - Bob Haug, ISEPA.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Superconducting Flywheel Development - Phil Johnson, Boeing.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Bipolar NiMH Battery Development and Testing - James

91

ORAU: Scientific and Technical Peer Review Services fact sheet  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to ensure timely and fair assessments for informed funding decisions. Scientific and Technical Peer Review Services Unmatched Access to Scientific and Technical Reviewers ORAU is...

92

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Smart Grid Panel  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Panel Smart Grid Panel Discussion 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Smart Grid Panel Discussion The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the Day 2 Smart Grid panel discussion are below. Moderator: Lee Kreval, SDG&E 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Puesh Kumar, American Public Power Association 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Rogelio Sullivan, NC State University 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Matt Wakefield, EPRI More Documents & Publications Smart Grid Characteristics, Values, and Metrics

93

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARPA-E project presentations from the first poster session on Day 1, chaired by DOE's Mark Johnson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Dispatchable Wind--Wind Power on Demand - Ian Lawson, General Compression ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel Regenerative Fuel Cells based on Anion Exchange Membranes - Katherine Ayers, Proton Onsite ESS 2012 Peer Review - Low Cost, High-Energy Density Flywheel Storage Grid

94

2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations 2 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available 2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis Presentations from two peer reviews in September are now available. The Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology Solutions (CERTS) Transmission Reliability R&D Load as a Resource (LAAR) Program peer review included five presentations on September 20, 2012, hosted by DOE at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. DOE's Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on September 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included nine sessions and two poster sessions. Addthis Related Articles 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available

95

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Session Morning Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the Day 1 morning session are below. Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC - Tom Rizy, ORNL 2012 SG Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Energy Surety, Microgrids - Mike Hightower, SNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Grid Standards and Conformance Testing - Tom Basso, NREL 2012 SG Peer Review - GridLAB-D and Integrated T&D Control - David Chassin,

96

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from Day 2 morning session are below. Moderator: Merrill Smith, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ron Melton, Battelle Memorial Institute 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LADWP Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Project - Mukhlesur Bhuiyan, City of Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: AEP Ohio gridSMART Demonstration

97

Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

emdoe.gov emdoe.gov Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management (ASCEM) Independent Peer Review and Assessment Team Report Technology Innovation and Development Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy September 15, 2010 Table of Contents Transmission Memorandum . . . . . . . . 1 ASCEM IPRA Team . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Findings and Observations . . . . . . . . . 5 Appendices 1: Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2: Biographical Information . . . . . 8 3: ASCEM IPRA CHARTER . . . . . 10 4: Conflict of Interest Form . . . . . 16 i Intentional Blank Page

98

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer...

99

Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t L e s s d e p e n d e n c e o n f o r e i g n o i l t o d a y, a n d t r a n s i t i o n t o a p e t r o l e u m - f r e e , e m i s s i o n s - f r e e v e h i c l e t o m o r r o w . F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m Heavy veHicle SyStemS OptimizatiOn merit review and peer evaluatiOn Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2006 Department of Energy (DOE) Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Peer Review Meeting, held April 18-20, 2006 at Argonne National Laboratory in suburban Chicago, Illinois. The goal of this document is to provide the reader with a summary of the comments and scores from expert reviewers from industry and government on these systems optimization projects.

100

NETL: Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews Coal and Power Systems Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs NETL is conducting a series of independent Peer Reviews of its Strategic Center for Coal Technology Programs in accordance with Departmental guidelines. Using a standard set of selection criteria, each technology program selects between 15 and 20 projects to be peer reviewed that represent the program's project portfolio and a significant portion of their fiscal year budget. Selected projects undergo a rigorous review during which the Principal Investigators summarize the status of their research, accomplishments, and future planned activities to an independent panel of experts. Projects are evaluated using a standard set of metrics to assess the progress of the Project Team towards achieving the Statements of Project Objectives as well as specific project milestones of the research. Following the Peer Review, NETL uses the results to guide and redirect the projects, as appropriate, underscoring NETL's commitment to funding and managing a portfolio of high-quality research.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Commercial Lighting Solutions, Webtool Peer Review Report  

SciTech Connect

The Commercial Lighting Solutions (CLS) project directly supports the U.S. Department of Energys Commercial Building Energy Alliance efforts to design high performance buildings. CLS creates energy efficient best practice lighting designs for widespread use, and they are made available to users via an interactive webtool that both educates and guides the end user through the application of the Lighting Solutions. This report summarizes the peer review of the beta version of the CLS webtool, which contains retail box lighting solutions. The methodology for the peer review process included data collection (stakeholder input), analysis of the comments, and organization of the input into categories for prioritization of the comments against a set of criteria. Based on this process, recommendations were developed about which feedback should be addressed for the release of version 1.0 of the webtool at the Lightfair conference in New York City in May 2009. Due to the volume of data (~500 comments) the methodology for addressing the peer review comments was central to the success of the ultimate goal of improving the tool. The comments were first imported into a master spreadsheet, and then grouped and organized in several layers. Solutions to each comment were then rated by importance and feasibility to determine the practicality of resolving the concerns of the commenter in the short-term or long-term. The rating system was used as an analytical tool, but the results were viewed thoughtfully to ensure that they were not the sole the factor in determining which comments were recommended for near-term resolution. The report provides a list of the top ten most significant and relevant improvements that will be made within the webtool for version 1.0 as well as appendices containing the short-term priorities in additional detail. Peer review comments that are considered high priority by the reviewers and the CLS team but cannot be completed for Version 1.0 are listed as long-term recommendations.

Jones, Carol C.; Meyer, Tracy A.

2009-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

102

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. University project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Strategies for Liquid-Anode Alkali Batteries of High Energy Density Operating at 0 to 100 C - C Austen Angell, AZ State ESS 2012 Peer Review - Iron Based Flow Batteries for Low Cost Grid Level Energy Storage - Jesse Wainright, Case Western Reserve

103

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARRA project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - 20 MW Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Implementation of Community ESS for Grid Support - Haukur Asgeirsson, Detroit Edison ESS 2012 Peer Review - Notrees Wind Storage - Jeff Gates, Duke Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Compressed Air Energy Storage - Robert Booth,

104

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Reviews in June and July Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July June 12, 2012 - 9:31am Addthis The Department of Energy will hold peer reviews for the Real Time Reliability Management program and the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) program this summer. Peer reviews are an opportunity for energy sector stakeholders to hear updates on ongoing and upcoming projects, provide feedback to program managers, and network with experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories. June 12-13, 2012: Real Time Reliability Management (RTGRM) The Transmission Reliability R&D Program will conduct a peer review of the Real Time Grid Reliability Management RTGRM is part of DOE's Transmission Reliability R&D Program and includes projects in support of the North

105

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Afternoon Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Afternoon Session 1 Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from Day 1 afternoon sessions are below. Moderators: Eric Lightner and Merrill Smith 2012 SG Peer Review - GridWise Architecture Council - Ron Melton, PNNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Expanded Demand Response Functionality - Graham Parker, PNNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project - Mani Venkata, Alstom 2012 SG Peer Review - Enhanced DMS Capabilities Supporting Distribution Network DER - Tristan Glenwright, Boeing

106

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through V) are available below. Session I: Dan Trudnowski, Ning Zhou, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session II: Brett Amidan, Bharat Bhargava, Ning Zhou Session III: Ken Martin, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session IV: Jeff Dagle, Jim Dyer, Joe Gracia, Joe Eto Session V: Joe Eto 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Measurement-Based Stability Assessment - Dan Trudnowski, U Montana 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Mode Meter Development - Ning

107

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Ben Hobbs (Johns Hopkins), Kameshwar Poolla (UC Berkeley) Session II: Ray Zimmerman (Cornell), Hsiao-Dong Chiang (Cornell) Session III: Shmuel Oren (UC Berkeley), Dan Tylavsky (U Arizona), Tom Overbye (U Illinois) Session IV: Lindsay Anderson (Cornell), HyungSeon Oh (Cornell) 2013 R&M Peer Review - Assessing Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs, Johns Hopkins 2013 R&M Peer Review - Coordinated Aggregation of Distributed Energy

108

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. SBIR project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Higher Power Motor for ARPA-E Flywheel - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Acid Based Blend Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries - Alan Cisar, Lynntech ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage

109

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Presentations 2 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions VI and VII) are available below. Session VI: Yuri Makarov, Henry Huang, Jim McCalley Session VII: Carlos Martinez, Pete Sauer, Gil Tam 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Real-Time Wide-Area Montoring Tool Based on CELL Method - Yuri Makarov, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Modal Analysis for Grid Operations (MANGO) - Henry Huang, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - New Security Tools for Real-Time Operations - Jim McCalley, Iowa State 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Automatic Reliability Reports

110

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. National lab project presentations from the first poster session on Day 1, chaired by DOE's Mark Johnson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Metrics for Storage and Pre-Standards Analyses - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Oahu Energy Storage Study - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Soowhan Kim, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Engineered Gate Oxides for Wide Bandgap Semiconductor MOSFETs - Jon Ihlefeld, SNL

111

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARRA project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - 20 MW Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Implementation of Community ESS for Grid Support - Haukur Asgeirsson, Detroit Edison ESS 2012 Peer Review - Notrees Wind Storage - Jeff Gates, Duke Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Compressed Air Energy Storage - Robert Booth,

112

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July June 12, 2012 - 9:31am Addthis The Department of Energy will hold peer reviews for the Real Time Reliability Management program and the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) program this summer. Peer reviews are an opportunity for energy sector stakeholders to hear updates on ongoing and upcoming projects, provide feedback to program managers, and network with experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories. June 12-13, 2012: Real Time Reliability Management (RTGRM) The Transmission Reliability R&D Program will conduct a peer review of the Real Time Grid Reliability Management RTGRM is part of DOE's Transmission Reliability R&D Program and includes projects in support of the North

113

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial 7 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to utility, commercial, and rail applications of advanced energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Application of Large-Scale ESS in AEP - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Park - Kent Holst, ISEP.pdf

114

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2011 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 9-13, 2011 in Arlington, Virginia

Satypal, S.

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Electronics Power Electronics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to power electronics are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - StatCom with Energy Storage to Smooth Intermittent Power Output of Wind Farms - Mesut Baran, NC State.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Cyber-Physical Systems Distributed Control - Mariesa

116

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Energy International Energy Storage Program Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage Program Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to international energy storage programs are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - DOE-CEC Energy Storage Program FY07 Projects - Daniel Borneo, SNL.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Joint NYSERDA-DOE Energy Storage Initiative Projects

117

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility & Commercial Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to utility, commercial, and rail applications of advanced energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Application of Large-Scale ESS in AEP - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Park - Kent Holst, ISEP.pdf

118

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Innovations in ESS Innovations in ESS Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to innovations in energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics ESS 2007 Peer Review - Evaluation of Lead-Carbon Storage Devices for Utility Applications - Enders Dickinson, MeadWestvaco.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - High Voltage Electrochemical Capacitor - David

119

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

120

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Visualization and Modeling National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best PracticesStandards Development National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

122

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practice DesignConfiguration National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

123

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Software Engineering Institute National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

124

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Secure Communications National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

125

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wind--Wind Power on Demand - Ian Lawson, General Compression ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel Regenerative Fuel Cells based on Anion Exchange Membranes - Katherine Ayers, Proton Onsite...

126

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for...

127

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

128

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Energy Storage Program Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage Program Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

129

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CECDOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDADOE...

130

Geothermal Technologies Program 2010 Peer Review | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Number NA DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Geothermal Technologies Program 2010 Peer Review Citation Joe Iovenitti....

131

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LLC 35 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421-3102 www.TIAXLLC.com Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update...

132

Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's High Temperature Superconductivity (HTS) for...

133

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_SAR.doc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Publications Microsoft Word - PeerReviewCCSP.doc Microsoft Word - Cross Reference Matrix Introduction.doc DRAFT NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change...

134

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews | U.S...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

135

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 13 presentations over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentations are available through the links. The agenda and list of presentations are included below. The Reliability and Markets activity of the Transmission Reliability program researches, develops, and implements electricity infrastructure and market simulations that integrate economics and engineering principles. The activity helps to ensure electric reliability, while also improving the efficiency and economics of market operations. Day 1: August 6 Session I Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty, Ben Hobbs,

136

2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fact Sheets Meetings & Events Electric Distribution R&D FY05 Annual Program and Peer Review Meeting April 19 & 20, 2005 Georgia Tech Conference Center Atlanta, Georgia Agenda...

137

Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Software peer review has proven to be a successful technique in open source software (OSS) development. In contrast to industry, where reviews are typically assigned to specific individuals, changes are broadcast to hundreds of potentially interested ... Keywords: case studies, grounded theory, open source software, peer review

Peter C. Rigby; Margaret-Anne Storey

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

138

JGI - CSP Review Process & Contract Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review Process and Contract Documents CSP | Overview | How to Propose a Project | Review Process | DOE Relevance Proposal Schedule | FAQ Review Process Full proposals will go...

139

Heavy Vehicle Materials Program 2005 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT HEAVY VEHICLE MATERIALS PROGRAM Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 2005 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Heavy Vehicle Materials Program Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, held September 13-15, 2005 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The goal of this document is to provide the reader with a summary of the comments and scores from expert reviewers from industry and government on these Materials Technologies projects.

140

peer  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 AUDIT REPORT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S PEER REVIEW PRACTICES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES APRIL 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Acting Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION : Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Peer Review Practices" BACKGROUND Fulfilling the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 has presented Federal science agencies with the challenge of defining ways to quantify and evaluate the outcomes of research. Measuring research program performance is particularly important for the Department of Energy because of its substantial investment (approximately $7 billion in Fiscal Year 1996) in research and development

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. Power Electronics (PE) Systems presentations are available below. ESPE 2008 Peer Review - High Power Density Silicon Carbide Power Electronic

142

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. Energy Storage Systems (ESS) presentations are available below. ESPE 2008 Peer Review - EAC Energy Storage Subcommittee - Brad Roberts, S&C

143

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Page 1 of 3 Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Page 1 of 3 U.S. Department of Energy Smart Grid R&D Peer Review San Diego Gas & Electric Energy Innovation Center 4760 Clairemont Mesa Blvd San Diego, California June 7-8, 2012 AGENDA Thursday, June 7, 2012 8:00 am Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 am - 8:40 am Welcome David Geier, Vice President Electric Operations, San Diego Gas & Electric 8:40 am - 9:00 am OE's R&D Division/Smart Grid R&D Program Hank Kenchington/Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy Moderator - Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy 9:00 am - 9:30 am Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC Tom Rizy, ORNL 9:30 am - 10:00 am CERTS Microgrid Test Bed Joe Eto, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

144

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Presentations 1 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through V) are available below. Session I: Dan Trudnowski, Ning Zhou, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session II: Brett Amidan, Bharat Bhargava, Ning Zhou Session III: Ken Martin, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session IV: Jeff Dagle, Jim Dyer, Joe Gracia, Joe Eto Session V: Joe Eto 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Measurement-Based Stability Assessment - Dan Trudnowski, U Montana 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Mode Meter Development - Ning Zhou, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Oscillation Monitoring System

145

2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Information Center » Library » Peer Reviews » 2005 Electric Information Center » Library » Peer Reviews » 2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations 2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations Electric Distribution R&D FY05 Annual Program and Peer Review Meeting April 19 & 20, 2005 Georgia Tech Conference Center Atlanta, Georgia Agenda (PDF 96 KB) Plenary Sessions Welcome and Our New Office of Electricity and Energy Assurance - Kevin Kolevar, DOE Overview of the Electric Distribution R&D - Eric Lightner, DOE Presentation (PDF 883 KB). GridWise Architectural Council - Rik Drummond, Drummond Group, Inc. Presentation (PDF 1.5 MB). Advanced Grid Application Consortium (GridApp) - James Crane, Exelon Corp. Presentation (PDF 1.6 MB). Session 1: Monitoring and Load Management Technologies

146

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting June 16, 2014...

147

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 14, 2010 FY10-42 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-Oak Ridge Associated Universities has appointed Tony Lester as director of the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education's program focused on scientific peer review. Lester has been serving in this role in an acting capacity since September 2009. Tony Lester Tony Lester In his role, Lester manages a research peer review capability that coordinates the use of independent, expert reviewers to determine the scientific technical feasibility of proposals submitted in response to government agency research needs. His team works closely with the federal government to provide liaison, consultation and operations support during the planning and execution of customers' grant management cycles. The

148

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below. Session V: Ken Martin (EPG), Jim Thorp (Virginia Tech), Scott Ghiocel (RPI), Mani Venkatasubramanian (WSU) Session VI: Pete Sauer (U Illinois), Carlos Martinez (ASR), Gil Tam (EPG) 2013 TR Review - Data Validation & Conditioning - Ken Martin, EPG 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Data Conditioning and Validation - Jim Thorp, Virginia Tech 2013 TR Review - PMU-based Voltage Stability - Scott Ghiocel, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2013 TR Review - Oscillation Monitoring System - Mani Venkatasubramanian,

149

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below. Session V: Ken Martin (EPG), Jim Thorp (Virginia Tech), Scott Ghiocel (RPI), Mani Venkatasubramanian (WSU) Session VI: Pete Sauer (U Illinois), Carlos Martinez (ASR), Gil Tam (EPG) 2013 TR Review - Data Validation & Conditioning - Ken Martin, EPG 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Data Conditioning and Validation - Jim Thorp, Virginia Tech 2013 TR Review - PMU-based Voltage Stability - Scott Ghiocel, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2013 TR Review - Oscillation Monitoring System - Mani Venkatasubramanian,

150

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. The final agenda and welcome presentation are below. Presentations

151

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Presentations 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Ben Hobbs (Johns Hopkins), Kameshwar Poolla (UC Berkeley) Session II: Ray Zimmerman (Cornell), Hsiao-Dong Chiang (Cornell) Session III: Shmuel Oren (UC Berkeley), Dan Tylavsky (U Arizona), Tom Overbye (U Illinois) Session IV: Lindsay Anderson (Cornell), HyungSeon Oh (Cornell) 2013 R&M Peer Review - Assessing Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs, Johns Hopkins 2013 R&M Peer Review - Coordinated Aggregation of Distributed Energy Resources - Kameshwar Poolla, UC Berkeley

152

NETL: SECA Workshop Proceedings, Peer Reviews, and Annual Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Solid State Energy Conversion Alliance (SECA) SECA Workshop Proceedings and Peer Reviews The proceedings from the all workshops that the SECA program has sponsored are described on this page. In addition, the Peer Review Results are also summarized. Annual Workshop Proceedings Core Technology Workshop Proceedings Peer Review Results 2008 SECA 9th Annual Workshop & Peer Review CD Cover Annual Workshop Proceedings 13th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2012) 12th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2011) 11th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2010) 10th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2009) 9th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (Aug 2008) 8th Annual SECA Workshop - San Antonio, TX (Aug 2007) 7th Annual SECA Workshop - Philadelphia, PA (Sept 2006)

153

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations are available through individual session links and the agenda is below. Presentations: Day 1: June 7 Morning session | Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE Afternoon sessions | Moderators: Eric Lightner and Merrill Smith, DOE Day 2: June 8 Morning session | Moderator: Merrill Smith, DOE Smart Grid Panel Discussion | Moderator: Lee Krevat, SDG&E First afternoon session | Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE Second afternoon session | Moderator: Eric Lightner, DOE

154

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations are available through the individual session links. The agenda and introduction by Joe Eto, LBNL, are available below. Day 1: June 27 Session I Baselining Studies and Analysis, Bharat Bhargava, EPG Baselining Studies and Analysis, Brett Amidan, PNNL Synchrophasor Standards Support and Development, Ken Martin, EPG Session II Advanced Synchrophasor Metrology, Stan Hadley, ORNL GPS Issue Management, Mark Buckner, ORNL Technology Assessment for Next Generation PMU, Mark Buckner, ORNL Session III Measurement-Based Stability Assessment, Dan Trudnowski, U. Montana

155

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability & Markets Peer Review Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentations and summaries are available through the links and the agenda is included below. Summaries | Full Presentations Day 1: August 7 Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty About Fuel Prices, Technology, Renewables Penetration and Market Responses Using a Multi-State Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch and Distributed Resource Aggregations Development and Testing of New Tools Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework: Phase 2 Essence of Structure Preserving (ESP) Network Reductions for

156

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentati...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems Distributed Control - Mariesa Crow, U Missouri-Rolla.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - SiC Power Converter System Thermal Mgmt and High Temp Packaging - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf...

157

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program...

158

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

159

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review for State and Federal Agencies  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE) supports federal agencies-such as the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), U.S. Department of Homeland Security...

160

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Flow Battery Modeling Energy Storage Systems Peer Review September 26-28, 2012 MJ Martinez (PI), J...

162

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TIAX LLC TIAX LLC 35 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421-3102 www.TIAXLLC.com Flow Battery Membrane Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012...

163

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. The final agenda and welcome presentation are below. Presentations

164

Groupware support for asynchronous document review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The formal document review process has basically remained unchanged since it was first introduced by Fagan in 1976. Central to this process is the review meeting, which all participants attend. However, recent empirical work has indicated that this meeting ... Keywords: asynchrony, computer supported co-operative work, document review, groupware

James Miller; John D. Ferguson; Paul Murphy

1999-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

165

2012 Load as a Resource Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Load as a Resource Program Peer Review Load as a Resource Program Peer Review 2012 Load as a Resource Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Load as a Resource (LAAR) Program peer review included 8 presentations on September 20, 2012 at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Agenda and presentations are below. 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Agenda 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Frequency Response Demand - Jeff Dagle, PNNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Frequency Responsive Load Evaluation and Benefits - Isabelle Snyder, ORNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Load as a Regulation Resource, Phase 2 - Sila Kiliccote, LBNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation - Nasr Alkadi, ORNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Integration and Extension of Direct Load Management of Smart Loads - Anna Scaglioni, UC Davis

166

March, 2010 NIFS Administrative Council External Peer Review Committee  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

21 2010 3 March, 2010 NIFS Administrative Council External Peer Review Committee NIFS Peer DEMO LHD V NIFS-HEAT W Y Li MHD Er2O3 Li Li-Pb FlibeF-BeF2 #12;10 V 4 FlibeF-BeF2 been invoked to enhance the electron current in V3Ga. In the NIFS engineering research, the main goals

Ito, Atsushi

167

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report: May 14-18, 2012, Arlington, VA  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the fiscal year (FY) 2012 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 14-18, 2012, in Arlington, VA.

Not Available

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

Advanced Combustion Engine Program 2005 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle ADVANCED COMBUSTION ENGINE PROGRAM F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 5, 2005 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on April 19-21, 2005 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were provided (with reviewers' names deleted) to the presenters in early June and were used by national laboratory researchers in the development of Annual Operating Plans (AOPs) for fiscal year (FY) 2006. The panel's

169

2010 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2010 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability research area focuses on two key areas: 1) Real-Time Grid Reliability Management and 2) Reliability and Markets. The first area develops monitoring and analysis tools that process synchrophasor data to enable real-time assessment of grid status and stability margins, with the goal of improving power system reliability and visibility through wide-area measurement and control. It is developing advanced technologies and tools to help create a resilient electric transmission system that can better detect disturbances, accommodate a variety of generation sources, and automatically reconfigure the grid to prevent widespread outages and/or rebalance the system. The second area

170

VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS PROGRAM AGENDA Marriott Crystal City at Reagan National Airport 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway Arlington, Virginia 22202 October 18, 2006 7:30 - 8:30 a.m. Continental Breakfast Times CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTROL SYSTEMS SECURITY 8:30 - 8:45 Introduction - Phil Overholt philip.overholt@hq.doe.gov Introduction - Hank Kenchington henry.kenchington@hq.doe.gov 8:45 - 9:15 Overview of Reliability and Markets Bob Thomas, PSERC/Cornell Univ. rjt1@cornell.edu Cyber Security Assessments of Control Systems in the Energy Sector Bob Hill, INL robert.hill@inl.gov 9:15 - 9:45 Market Monitoring Tools Bernard Lesieutre, LBNL bclesieutre@lbnl.gov Cyber Security Assessments of Inter Control Center Communications Protocol Implementations

171

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secure Communications Secure Communications Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Secure Communications National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Secure Communications are below. CEDS 2010 Peer Review - Cryptographic Trust Management - Mark Hadley,

172

Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's High Temperature Superconductivity (HTS) for Electric Systems Program's specific mission is to work in partnership with industry to develop HTS wire and perform other research and development activities leading to the commercialization of HTS-based electric power applications by U.S. companies. This technology contributes to several key performance improvements of the grid. It enhances reliability by increasing capacity, which relieves congestion and helps prevent outages. Efficiency is improved as a result of the reduction of loss during operation which both conserves

173

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Software Engineering Institute Software Engineering Institute Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Software Engineering Institute National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations from Carnegie Mellon University's Software Engineering

174

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Visualization and Modeling Visualization and Modeling Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Visualization and Modeling National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Visualization and Modeling are below.

175

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: Independent Peer Reviews  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen Manufacturing Fuel Cells Applications/Technology Validation Safety Codes and Standards Education Basic Research Systems Analysis Systems Integration Independent Reviews Macro-System Model U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Systems Integration > Independent Peer Reviews Printable Version Independent Peer Reviews DOE's Systems Integrator convenes independent technical reviews to gauge progress toward meeting specific technical targets and to provide technical information necessary for key decisions. These independent reviews are important to the program: They provide an unbiased understanding of the status of the program's technical targets based on the input of independent technical experts. This understanding is critical to program decision-making, budget

176

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Bharat Bhargava (EPG), Brett Amidan (PNNL), Ken Martin (EPG) Session II: Mark Buckner (ORNL) Session III: Dan Trudnowski (U Montana), Ning Zhou (PNNL) Session IV: Frank Tuffner (PNNL), Bernie Lesieutre (U Wisconsin), Harold Kirkham (PNNL), YC Zhang (NREL) 2013 TR Review - Eastern Interconnection Phase Angle Base Lining Study - Bharat Bhargava, EPG 2013 TR Review - Baselining Studies and Analysis - Brett Amidan, PNNL 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Standards Development and Support - Ken Martin, EPG

177

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Bharat Bhargava (EPG), Brett Amidan (PNNL), Ken Martin (EPG) Session II: Mark Buckner (ORNL) Session III: Dan Trudnowski (U Montana), Ning Zhou (PNNL) Session IV: Frank Tuffner (PNNL), Bernie Lesieutre (U Wisconsin), Harold Kirkham (PNNL), YC Zhang (NREL) 2013 TR Review - Eastern Interconnection Phase Angle Base Lining Study - Bharat Bhargava, EPG 2013 TR Review - Baselining Studies and Analysis - Brett Amidan, PNNL 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Standards Development and Support - Ken Martin, EPG

178

Peer Review 2008 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Subject: Report on the Quality Assessment Review of the Investigative Operations of the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Energy Reviewer: U.S. Small...

179

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Program Overview - Eric Lightner, DOE_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - University of HI Renewable and Distributed Systems - Jay Griffen, Univ. of HI.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Dennis Summer, Fort Collins_0.pdf

180

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Three of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Smart Charger Technology Development, Frank Tuffner, PNNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Vehicle to Grid Demonstration - Willett Kempton, U. Delaware.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Estimating and Mitigating Cascading Failure Risk - Paul Hines, U. Vermont.pdf

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel A report for the DOE on the Yucca Mountain Project. Final Report...

182

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion CrackingFatigue Modeling for Light Water Reactor Cooling System Components Working...

183

Peer Review 2009 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2009 Reviewer: Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General The attached report presents the results of our external...

184

Peer Review Policy | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policy Grants & Contracts Guidance Laboratory Scientific Focus Area...

185

2012 CERTS Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

R&M Review August 7-8, 2012 Cornell University Statler Hotel 130 Statler Drive | Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 257-2500 Day 1: August 7, 2011 The meeting will be held in the Statler Hotel...

186

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on AddThis.com... Publications Program Publications Roadmaps Program Plans Reports to Congress Annual Progress Reports

187

Commercial Lighting Solutions Webtool Peer Review Report, Office Solutions  

SciTech Connect

The Commercial Lighting Solutions (CLS) project directly supports the U.S. Department of Energys Commercial Building Energy Alliance efforts to design high performance buildings. CLS creates energy efficient best practice lighting designs for widespread use, and they are made available to users via an interactive webtool that both educates and guides the end user through the application of the Lighting Solutions. This report summarizes the peer review of the CLS webtool for offices. The methodology for the peer review process included data collection (stakeholder input), analysis of the comments, and organization of the input into categories for prioritization of the comments against a set of criteria. Based on this process, recommendations were developed for the release of version 2.0 of the webtool at the Lightfair conference in Las Vegas in May 2010. The report provides a list of the top ten most significant and relevant improvements that will be made within the webtool for version 2.0 as well as appendices containing the comments and short-term priorities in additional detail. Peer review comments that are considered high priority by the reviewers and the CLS team but cannot be completed for Version 2.0 are listed as long-term recommendations.

Beeson, Tracy A.; Jones, Carol C.

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 18 -22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia.

Satyapal, S.

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Vulnerability and Instrusion Detection are below.

190

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Vulnerability and Instrusion Detection are below.

191

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Best Practices/Standards Development Best Practices/Standards Development Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practices/Standards Development National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Best Practices/Standards Development are below.

192

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs.

193

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage 8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Develop advanced power electronics for the grid of the future

194

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program 7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Make energy storage ubiquitous ESS Program Makeup ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - BPA ETO based STATCOM Project - ETO Development Project - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - Iowa Stored Energy Project - Electrolyte Research

195

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Practice Design/Configuration Practice Design/Configuration Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practice Design/Configuration National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Best Practice Design/Configuration are below.

196

2005 Conference Proceedings: SECA Core Technology Program Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program Peer Review Program Peer Review October 25-26, 2005 Table of Contents Disclaimer Papers and Presentations Materials Modeling & Simulation Balance of Plant Cell Components Breakout Sections Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government or any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

197

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Ross Guttromson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Na-ion Intercalation Electrodes for Na-ion Battery - Jun Liu, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Carbon Enhanced VRLA Batteries - David Enos, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Improved Properties of Nanocomposites for Flywheel Applications - Tim Boyle, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Magnetic Composites for Flywheel Energy Storage -

198

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Dan Borneo, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA ESS 2012 Peer Review - Life Cycle Testing and Evaluation of Energy Storage Devices - Summer Ferreira, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Test Pad - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance

199

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Tony Martino, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - CAES Geo Performance for Natural Gas and Salt Reservoirs and TMH Response of GSFs - Payton Gardner, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Thermoelectrochemical Energy Storage - Nick Hudak, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Component Research for Redox Flow Batteries - Tom Zawodzinski, ORNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Nitrogen-Oxygen Battery for Large Scale Energy Storage - Frank Delnick, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium-based Battery Development - Dave Ingersoll,

200

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Program Overview - Eric Lightner, DOE_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - University of HI Renewable and Distributed Systems - Jay Griffen, Univ. of HI.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Dennis Summer, Fort Collins_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Integrated & Automated DG Technologies Demo - Roger

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Ross Guttromson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Na-ion Intercalation Electrodes for Na-ion Battery - Jun Liu, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Carbon Enhanced VRLA Batteries - David Enos, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Improved Properties of Nanocomposites for Flywheel Applications - Tim Boyle, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Magnetic Composites for Flywheel Energy Storage -

202

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Day 3, Day 3, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 3, chaired by PNNL's Landis Kannberg, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Membranes for VRFB - Cy Fujimoto, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Materials for Flow Batteries - Travis Anderson, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Redox Flow Battery Prototype Development - Vincent Sprenkle, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Battery

203

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Intelligent Power Infrastructure Consortium - Deepak Divan, Georgia Institute of Technology.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - HI Sustainable Energy Project, Part 1 - Jennifer Stinebaugh, SNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - HI Sustainable Energy Project, Part 2 - Ben Kroposki, NREL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Marin County Renewables, David Cohen, Infotility.pdf

204

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Borrego Springs Microgrid - Tom Bialek, SDG&E.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Demonstration - Craig Gee, Chevron.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Texas Microgrids for Colonias and Renewable Microgrid STEM Education - Dean Schneider, TCAT.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL.pdf

205

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Dan Borneo, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA ESS 2012 Peer Review - Life Cycle Testing and Evaluation of Energy Storage Devices - Summer Ferreira, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Test Pad - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance

206

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Three Morning Presentations Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Three of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Smart Charger Technology Development, Frank Tuffner, PNNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Vehicle to Grid Demonstration - Willett Kempton, U. Delaware.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Estimating and Mitigating Cascading Failure Risk - Paul Hines, U. Vermont.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - GridWise Architecture - Ronald Melton, PNNL.pdf

207

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The afternoon presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Interoperability of Demand Response Resources in NY - John Giacona, Con Edison.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Integrated Distribution Management System in AL - Joe Schatz, SCS.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Yahia Baghzouz, UNLV.pdf

208

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission August 15, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM revamped and expanded peer reviews for its contracts and projects in the past year with a goal of improving performance and delivering results in the world's largest nuclear cleanup

209

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Stan Attcity, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel High Energy Density Dielectrics for Scalable Capacitor Needs - Geoff Brennecka, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Low Cost, Manufacturable High Voltage Power Module for ESS - Brandon Passmore, APEI ESS 2012 Peer Review - 6.5 kV Silicon Carbide Half-Bridge Power Switch Module for ESS Applications - John Hostetler, United Silicon Carbide ESS 2012 Peer Review - 15 kV Phase Leg Power Modules with SiC Devices -

210

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 1, chaired by Bill Capp of Grid Storage Consulting, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Solution for Smart Grid Renewable Energy Applications - Sheri Nevins, Raytheon & Ron Moss, EnerVault ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Controls for Grid Stability - Ray Byrne, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Secondary Use of Vehicle Batteries in Power Systems

211

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 1, chaired by NETL's Ron Staubly, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wind Firming EnergyFarm - Tom Stepien, Primus Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Grid-Scale Energy Storage Demo for Ancillary Services Using UltraBattery - John Wood, Ecoult ESS 2012 Peer Review - PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting - Steve Willard, PNM ESS 2012 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Sodium Ion Battery for Grid Level Applications - Ted Wiley, Aquion Energy

212

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission August 15, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM revamped and expanded peer reviews for its contracts and projects in the past year with a goal of improving performance and delivering results in the world's largest nuclear cleanup

213

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 1, Session 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 1, chaired by Bill Capp of Grid Storage Consulting, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Solution for Smart Grid Renewable Energy Applications - Sheri Nevins, Raytheon & Ron Moss, EnerVault ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Controls for Grid Stability - Ray Byrne, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Secondary Use of Vehicle Batteries in Power Systems

214

SRS Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review, July 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SRS-2011-07-15 SRS-2011-07-15 Site: Savannah River Site, NA-26 Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review Dates of Activity : 07/12/2011 - 07/15/2011 Report Preparer: James Lockridge Activity Description/Purpose: At the request of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Enterprise Project Management (NA- APM-20), the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), provided an expert to review the Waste Solidification Building (WSB) startup programs and procedures associated with worker safety and health, environment, and security. Criteria for the review was detailed in the Criteria,

215

Peer Review Policies | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Peer Review Policies Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity...

216

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 28, 2012.

217

Peer Merit / Review Policies | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

218

Advanced Combustion, Emission Control, Health Impacts, and Fuels Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06 06 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t L e s s d e p e n d e n c e o n f o r e i g n o i l t o d a y, a n d t r a n s i t i o n t o a p e t r o l e u m - f r e e , e m i s s i o n s - f r e e v e h i c l e t o m o r r o w . F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m AdvAnced combustion, emission controls, HeAltH impActs, And Fuels merit review And peer evAluAtion Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 2006 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2006 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion, Emission Controls, Health Impacts, and Fuels Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 15-18, 2006 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were provided (with reviewers' names deleted) to the presenters in early June and were used by national laboratory

219

b. document identification and review policy  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

documents, as necessary, and for historical purposes; To establish a means in ... In the bottom left-hand corner of each document, a history of the document.

220

Peer Review of NRC Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) Models underwent a Peer Review using ASME PRA standard (Addendum C) as endorsed by NRC in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200. The review was performed by a mix of industry probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) experts and NRC PRA experts. Representative SPAR models, one PWR and one BWR, were reviewed against Capability Category I of the ASME PRA standard. Capability Category I was selected as the basis for review due to the specific uses/applications of the SPAR models. The BWR SPAR model was reviewed against 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements; however, based on the Capability Category I level of review and the absence of internal flooding and containment performance (LERF) logic only 216 requirements were determined to be applicable. Based on the review, the BWR SPAR model met 139 of the 216 supporting requirements. The review also generated 200 findings or suggestions. Of these 200 findings and suggestions 142 were findings and 58 were suggestions. The PWR SPAR model was also evaluated against the same 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements. Of these requirements only 215 were deemed appropriate for the review (for the same reason as noted for the BWR). The PWR review determined that 125 of the 215 supporting requirements met Capability Category I or greater. The review identified 101 findings or suggestions (76 findings and 25 suggestions). These findings or suggestions were developed to identify areas where SPAR models could be enhanced. A process to prioritize and incorporate the findings/suggestions supporting requirements into the SPAR models is being developed. The prioritization process focuses on those findings that will enhance the accuracy, completeness and usability of the SPAR models.

Anthony Koonce; James Knudsen; Robert Buell

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review » Fiscal Peer Review » Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review In November 2011, the Water Power Program held their Annual Peer Review Meeting in Alexandria, Virginia. The purpose of the meeting was to evaluate DOE-funded hydropower and marine and hydrokinetic R&D projects for their contribution to the mission and goals of the Water Power Program and to assess progress made against stated objectives. At the review, approximately 85 projects were presented, representing a DOE investment of over $100 million over the last few years. In addition to the formal review, this event was an excellent opportunity for the water power community to share ideas and solutions to address challenges facing the hydropower and marine and hydrokinetic energy industries.

222

Peer Review Summary Document (7/30/2012)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of oil from Canadian tar sand and other unconventional oil resources is incompatible with the aim. In 2007 Statoil bought the rights to extract oil from tar sand in the fragile boreal forest of Alberta that extraction of unconventional resources, such as tar sand and shale gas, is incompatible with the attempts

223

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Flow Battery Membrane Flow Battery Membrane Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012 Jack Treger treger.jack@tiaxllc.com Washington DC, September 27, 2012 Flow Battery Membrane Background and Purpose 1 Vanadium redox batteries (VRB) for energy storage require improved ion- selective membranes. * Vanadium permeation across current membranes leads to self-discharge and decreases cycling efficiency: - Negative half cell: V 2+ V 3+ + e - E o = -0.255V - Positive half cell: e - + VO 2 + + 2H + VO 2+ + H 2 O E o = 1.00V . * Current perfluorosulfonic acid polymer membranes are costly. * TIAX is developing a novel composite bipolar membrane: - Composite anionic membrane minimizes content of costly perfluorosulfonic acid polymer - Made bipolar by a cationic surface layer to improve selectivity for

224

FY2002 ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS PEER REVIEW AGENDA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM ANNUAL PEER REVIEW November 2-3, 2006 Washington Marriott Hotel, Washington, DC (USA) AGENDA Thursday, November 2, 2004 7:45 AM Continental Breakfast 8:30 Welcome and Overview - Dr. Imre Gyuk, DOE 8:40 DOE Perspective - DOE 9:00 ESS Program Overview - John Boyes, Sandia National Laboratories 9:20 NAS Battery Performance at Charleston, WV - Ali Nourai, AEP Corp. (Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy (DOE/ESS) through Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). 9:40 Evaluation of the Kauai Island Utility Co-operative System for Energy storage Potential - Abbas Akhil, Sandia National Laboratories (Funded by the Kauai Island Utility Co-0p). 10:00 Iowa Stored Energy Plant - Bob Haug, Iowa Stored Energy Plant Agency

225

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program 6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - HybSim Hybrid Storage Model Development Congressionally-Directed Programs - University of Missouri-Rolla - Grid Modernization - Iowa Stored Energy Project - EEI - BiPolar Ni-MH Battery Development - Sprint - Storage for Telecommunications Apps. - Emerson - Network Power - Beacon Power - Frequency Regulation Plant Design - Mead Westvaco - Research on Lead-Carbon Asymmetric Super capacitors (FY05) ESS Program Makeup (cont.) ESS Program Makeup cont. SBIR - Aegis Technology - PII - Arkansas Power Electronic International -

226

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage 9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Significant Events in FY09 Power Electronics Subprogram suffered a large budget cut in FY09 and was dropped as a separate program for FY10. ESSP will reabsorb power electronics development for energy storage applications back into program. Funding Due to a lengthy Congressional continuing resolution, FY09 funding was not received until April Power Electronics Sub-Program ESSP Program Highlights

227

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Flow Battery Modeling Energy Storage Systems Peer Review September 26-28, 2012 MJ Martinez (PI), J Clausen, SM Davison, HK Moffat Flow Battery Modeling Schematic of a Flow Battery PURPOSE: The flow battery modeling task seeks to improve fundamental understanding and enable high-performing, low-cost designs of flow batteries through

228

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 First Afternoon Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

First Afternoon First Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 First Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the first Day 2 afternoon session are below. Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LIPA Smart Energy Corridor Project - Ming Mui, LIPA 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Enhanced Demand and Distribution Management Regional Demonstration - Craig Miller, NRECA 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: NSTAR Automated Mater Reading Based Dynamic Pricing - Douglas Horton, NSTAR Electric & Gas

229

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Second Afternoon Session  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Afternoon Second Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Second Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the second Day 2 afternoon session are below. Moderator: Eric Lightner, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Bill Becker, Spirae 2012 SG Peer Review - Interoperability of Demand Response Resources in New York - Andre Wellington, ConEd NY 2012 SG Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Robert Boehm, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas

230

Thermophysical properties of uranium dioxide - Version 0 for peer review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Data on thermophysical properties of solid and liquid UO{sub 2} have been reviewed and critically assessed to obtain consistent thermophysical property recommendations for inclusion in the International Nuclear Safety Center Database on the World Wide Web (http://www.insc.anl.gov.). Thermodynamic properties that have been assessed are enthalpy, heat capacity, melting point, enthalpy of fusion, thermal expansion, density, surface tension, and vapor pressure. Transport properties that have been assessed are thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, viscosity, and emissivity. Summaries of the recommendations with uncertainties and detailed assessments for each property are included in this report and in the International Nuclear Safety Center Database for peer review. The assessments includes a review of the experiments and data, an examination of previous recommendations, the basis for selecting recommendations, a determination of uncertainties, and a comparison of recommendations with data and with previous recommendations. New data and research that have led to new recommendations include thermal expansion and density measurements of solid and liquid UO{sub 2}, derivation of physically-based equations for the thermal conductivity of solid UO{sub 2}, measurements of the heat capacity of liquid UO{sub 2}, and measurements and analysis of the thermal conductivity of liquid UO{sub 2}.

Fink, J.K.; Petri, M.C.

1997-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

231

Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents The purpose of this guidance is to assist EPA reviewers of NEPA documents in providing accurate, realistic, and consistent comments on the assessment of cumulative impacts. The guidance focuses on specific issues that are critical in EPA's review of NEPA documents under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. The guidance offers information on what issues to look for in the analysis, what practical considerations should be kept in mind when reviewing the analysis, and what should be said in EPA comments concerning the adequacy of the analysis. Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents More Documents & Publications

232

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly. Part II  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In our previous work (Scientometrics 87:293---301, 2011), a numerical model of over-competitive research funding in "peer-group-assessed-grant-based-funding-system" was proposed and the process was firstly investigated quantitatively. The simulation ... Keywords: 60H99, C15, C32, Cosmology, Excessive competition, Mainstream, Peer review, Publications, Research funding

Xuan Zhen Liu; Hui Fang

2012-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

Criteria Review and Approach Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Criteria Review and Approach Documents Criteria Review and Approach Documents Criteria Review and Approach Documents May 31, 2013 CRAD, Criticality Safety Controls Implementation - May 31, 2013 Criticality Safety Controls Implementation with DOE activities and sites (HSS CRAD 45-18) May 6, 2013 CRAD, Review of Safety Basis Development - May 6, 2013 Review of Safety Basis Development for the Los Alamos National Laboratory Transuranic Waste Facility (HSS CRAD 45-59, Rev. 0) April 25, 2013 CRAD, Documented Safety Analysis Development - April 23, 2013 Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (LBL Facilities) (HSS CRAD 45-58, Rev. 0) February 1, 2013 CRAD, Review of Safety Basis Development - January 31, 2013 Review of Safety Basis Development for the Savannah River Site Salt Waste

236

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. The agenda & project list is below. Presentations Energy Storage Systems (ESS) presentations Power Electronics (PE) Systems presentations

237

Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy Subject: Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immob ilization Plant (LBL Facilities) - C riteria and...

238

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Peer Merit / Review Policies Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page

239

2012 SG Peer Review - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review Meeting DOE - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project S. S. (Mani) Venkata Alstom Grid June 7, 2012 December 2008 DOE Integrated Smart...

240

Appendix C: Criteria Review and Approach Documents, National Nuclear  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Appendix C: Criteria Review and Approach Documents, National Appendix C: Criteria Review and Approach Documents, National Nuclear Security Administration Appendix C: Criteria Review and Approach Documents, National Nuclear Security Administration A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of a table of National Nuclear Security Administration Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADS) with links to the CRADs. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. Appendix C: Criteria Review and Approach Documents, National Nuclear Security Administration More Documents & Publications CRAD, Emergency Management - Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Occupational Safety & Health Criteria & Review Approach Documents |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Occupational Safety & Health Criteria & Review Approach Documents Occupational Safety & Health Criteria & Review Approach Documents Occupational Safety & Health Criteria & Review Approach Documents Documents Available for Download CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Contractor ORR

242

Conduct of Operations Criteria, Review, & Approach Documents | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Conduct of Operations Criteria, Review, & Approach Documents Conduct of Operations Criteria, Review, & Approach Documents Conduct of Operations Criteria, Review, & Approach Documents Documents Available for Download CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Contractor ORR CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project

243

Safety Basis Criteria & Review Approach Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Basis Criteria & Review Approach Documents Safety Basis Criteria & Review Approach Documents Safety Basis Criteria & Review Approach Documents Documents Available for Download CRAD, Safety Basis - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility CRAD, Safety Basis - Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II CRAD, Safety Basis - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility CRAD, Safety Basis - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Contractor ORR CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project CRAD, Safety Basis - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility

244

Emergency Management Criteria & Review Approach Documents | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Emergency Management Criteria & Review Approach Documents Emergency Management Criteria & Review Approach Documents Emergency Management Criteria & Review Approach Documents Documents Available for Download CRAD, Emergency Management - Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II CRAD, Emergency Management - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility CRAD, Emergency Management - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility CRAD, Emergency Management - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor CRAD, Emergency Management - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Contractor ORR CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Emergency Management - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide

245

2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations 3 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available September 9, 2013 - 3:25pm Addthis The agendas and presentations from the June and August 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Program reviews are now available for download. The June 27-28 Transmission Reliability Program review combined the North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) and Advanced Application Development subprograms. The 2-day review included an overview of the program and six sessions of presentations from researchers funded by OE. The NASPI working group addresses the installation of synchrophasor networks across the United States with Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grant funds. Advanced Application Development projects include

246

Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process Final Report December 2001 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. CONTENTS Summary Objectives International perspective Recommendations for future assessments 1 Introduction 1.1 Background to the Yucca Mountain Project 1.2 Terms of reference, objectives and scope of the review 1.3 Conduct of the review 1.4 Organisation of this report 2 General Considerations 2.1 Regulatory perspective 2.2 Performance assessment rationale 2.3 General approach to performance assessment 2.4 Documentation 3 Sub-system methodology 3.1 Repository design

247

Responsible Authorship and Peer Review James R. Wilson  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of cold fusion is a striking illustration of what happens when scientists circumvent the normal peer and resources to show that there is no convincing evidence for room-temperature fusion. Much of this effort would not have been necessary had normal scientific procedures been followed. --John R. Huizenga, Cold

248

Full Economic Costing:-Updated guidance notes for peer reviewers  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the level of resources required to undertake the project and not their unit cost. In particular, peer are as follows: 1) Directly Incurred costs: These are costs which are specific to a project and will be charged to the project on the basis of actual costs incurred. They must be supported by an audit record, which

249

Microsoft Word - ASME FY08 Fuel Cell Peer Review Report_FINAL.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Meeting Host Organization Technology & Management Services, Inc. Steven T. Ostheim (412) 386-6485 Review Panel AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Minking K. Chyu, Chair, Peer Review Panel Richard Laudenat, Chair, Peer Review Executive Committee Michael Tinkleman, Director, Research ASME Center for Research and Technology Development (202) 785-7394 Meeting Facilitator and Final Report Ross Brindle, Energetics Incorporated (410) 953-6239 Work Done Under Prime Contract Number DE-AC26-05NT41816 (Subtask 305.01.02.3) FINAL REPORT 2008 STRATEGIC CENTER FOR COAL FUEL CELL PROGRAM PEER REVIEW MEETING Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania April 21-25, 2008 MEETING SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT José D. Figueroa NETL Project Manager and Meeting Coordinator

250

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

251

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

252

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

Department of Energy Quadrennial Technology Review Framing Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quadrennial Technology Review Quadrennial Technology Review Framing Document http://energy.gov/QTR 3/14/2011 U.S. Department of ENERGY 2 The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has initiated a review of its energy technology activities (Quadrennial Technology Review, or QTR). This framing document is a principal means of facilitating stakeholder engagement in that process. It describes the nation's energy landscape and challenges, identifies important research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) policy choices to be made, and summarizes the current status of selected energy technologies and DOE technology program goals. It is intended to serve as the common framework for stakeholder engagement through advisory

255

Documents  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

documents en MHK LCOE Reporting documents en MHK LCOE Reporting Guidance Draft http://en.openei.org/community/document/mhk-lcoe-reporting-guidance-draft To normalize competing claims of LCOE, DOE has developed-for its own use-a standardized cost and performance data reporting process to facilitate uniform calculation of LCOE from MHK device developers. This standardization framework is only the first version in what is anticipated to be an iterative process that involves industry and the broader DOE stakeholder community. Multiple files are attached here for review and comment.document/mhk-lcoe-reporting-guidance-draft" target="_blank">read more http://en.openei.org/community/document/mhk-lcoe-reporting-guidance-draft#comments

256

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy-Efficient Product Procurement (EEPP) Portfolio Meeting: Washington D.C., Dec. 4, 2012 Reviewers: David Goldstein (Chair), Harvey Sachs, Cyndi Vallina, Marina Moses, and Shahzeen Attari Review: Jan. 25, 2013 Summary The Review Committee met in Washington, D.C., and engaged in a day-long discussion with FEMP EEPP staff and contractors. Program staff gave clear and effective presentations, and we had extensive and illuminating discussions with the staff, and to a limited extent with other interested parties who attended. The Committee worked together after the meeting and by email to produce this review. Our review addresses: * strategic issues with respect to the program,

257

Development of Criteria And Review Approach Documents CRADs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRAINING Development of Criteria And Development of Criteria And Review Approach Documents CRADs Readiness Review Official DOE Team Leader Readiness Review Training TRAINING READINESS REVIEW TRAINING Implementation Plan * Prepared by RR Team Leader with assistance of the Team * Documents the process for the RR and rationale for that process * DOE RR should address adequacy of the Contractor RR * On-site visits and discussions often needed in preparation of IP Official DOE Team Leader Readiness Review Training needed in preparation of IP 2 TRAINING READINESS REVIEW TRAINING IP Approval * The IP is approved by the Team Leader * No other approval is required by DOE O425.1D Official DOE Team Leader Readiness Review Training

258

2012 SG Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed g Joe Eto Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 7 June 2012 The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed Objective To lower the cost and improve the performance of clusters of smaller distributed energy resources and loads when operated in an integrated manner when operated in an integrated manner, i.e., as microgrids Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) Prior to FY12, FY13, Out-year(s) Technical Scope The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed is being expanded through the addition of new hardware elements: 1) a CERTS- compatible conventional synchronous generator ; 2) an FY 12 , authorized , requested y ( ) 2500K 1000K 1000K 2500K energy management system relying on software as a service (SaaS) for dispatch; 3) a commercially available, stand-alone

259

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ardalan Kemiab, Southern California Edison  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) ( ) Ed Kamiab Southern California Edison (SCE) 6/8/2012 ISGD Objective SCE' I i S t G id D t ti (ISGD) ill (Insert graphic here) SCE's Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) will demonstrate an integrated, scalable Smart Grid system that includes many of the interlocking pieces of an end- to-end Smart Grid system, from the transmission and distrib tion s stems to cons mer applications s ch as distribution systems to consumer applications such as smart appliances and plug-in electric vehicles. Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY2010 FY2015 1. Energy Smart Customer Devices 2 Year 2020 Distribution System Technical Scope FY2010 - FY2015 $39,612 2. Year 2020 Distribution System 3. Interoperability & Cyber Security 4. Workforce of the Future

260

Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 May 10, 2012 - 11:53am Addthis The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability will hold its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects will be presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. A draft agenda and online registration are available. In conjunction with the peer review, the Smart Grid R&D Program will hold a discussion forum for principle investigators of current projects and select smart grid experts on June 6, 2012. Input on current capabilities and gap areas in need of future R&D will be used to update the Multi-Year Program Plan.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

ForPeerReview Microbiology and performance of a methanogenic biofilm reactor during the1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: Biofilm, Anaerobic digestion, Bioreactor start-up, Microbial population21 dynamics, Methanogenesis-00615442,version1-19Aug2011 #12;ForPeerReview 3 Introduction1 Anaerobic digestion is an effective method). The limitation of4 anaerobic digestion processes resides in the duration and instability of their transitory

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

262

The convergence of digital libraries and the peer-review process  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Pre-print repositories have seen a significant increase in use over the past fifteen years across multiple research domains. Researchers are beginning to develop applications capable of using these repositories to assist the scientific community above ... Keywords: OAI-PMH, Open Archives Initiative, peer-review process, pre-print repositories

Marko A. Rodriguez; Johan Bollen; Herbert Van De Sompel

2006-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

263

PEER-REVIEW Detection Of Lateral Non-Uniformities In Fluidized Bed Combustors  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, greatly influences solid circulation patterns and gas phase mixing which inturn affects various in-bed by Dent etal!! in a Fludized bed combustor. For a vertically rising bubble midway through the two sensorsPEER-REVIEW Detection Of Lateral Non-Uniformities In Fluidized Bed Combustors .. A. Venkata Ramayya

Columbia University

264

MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 1 M. J. Gouge  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, and for plasma discharge termination on demand. #12;MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 3 · Gas fueling prototype testing ­ response time experiments for impurity gas puffing into divertor · Pellet fueling development ­ world/s (deuterium) ­ pellet feed/rotor dynamics for centrifuge injector (with CEA) ­ piston and screw extruder

265

Technical/Peer Review Draft May 2006 PART II OVERVIEW1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Technical/Peer Review Draft May 2006 II-1 PART II OVERVIEW1 2 Energy, Industry, and Waste Fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) are used primarily for their concentration of chemical energy is identified as emissions from energy and emissions from industrial21 processes.22 23 Emissions by Month and

266

Facility Representative Program: Criteria Review and Approach Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Assessment Tools Assessment Tools Surveillance Guides Manager's Guide for Safety and Health Walkthroughs Criteria Review and Approach Document This page provides Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADS) to assist Facility Representatives. Please submit your CRADS for posting by sending them to the HQ FR Program Manager. Please include the subject, date, and a contact person. Communications NASA Benchmarks Communications Assessment Plan Configuration Management Configuration Management Assessment Plan Confined Space Confined Spaces Assessment Plan Conduct of Operations Conduct of Operations Assessment Plan Electrical Assessment Electrical Safety Assessment Plan Facility Procedures Verification and Validation of Facility Procedures Assessment Plan Hoisting and Rigging

267

SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE: 2006 TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW  

SciTech Connect

Prompted by a $10 million Congressional allocation to identify supplemental actions to protect the Columbia River from groundwater contamination beneath the Hanford Reservation, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Clean-up Technology identified twenty-three potential technical projects and then down-selected ten of these for further evaluation. An independent expert peer review was conducted for the ten down-selected proposals. The review panel consisted of twenty-three recognized subject matter experts that broadly represented academia, industry, and federal laboratories. Of the initial ten proposals reviewed, one was given unconditional support, six were given conditional support, and three were not supported as proposed. Three additional proposals were then submitted by DOE for review--these proposals were structured, in part, to respond to the initial round of technical peer review comments. Peer reviews of these additional proposals provided conditional support. For those proposals that received conditional support, DOE requested specific implementation and work plans and assessed whether the plans adequately addressed the technical conditions identified by the review panel. The final list of technology proposals receiving support, or conditional support, primarily focused on understanding and reducing the potential impacts of uranium, chromium, and strontium from facilities adjacent to the Columbia River, with a secondary focus on understanding and limiting the future Columbia River impacts from the large carbon tetrachloride groundwater plume underlying and downgradient of the Hanford Central Plateau facilities. The results and recommendations of the peer reviews informed the final DOE project selections and supported implementation of the selected projects to protect the Columbia River and address groundwater contamination at Hanford.

Looney, B; Dawn Kaback; Gene Leboeuf; Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz; Lynn Lefkoff

2006-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

268

External Peer Review Team Report Underground Testing Area Subproject for Frenchman Flat, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

An external peer review was conducted to review the groundwater models used in the corrective action investigation stage of the Underground Test Area (UGTA) subproject to forecast zones of potential contamination in 1,000 years for the Frenchman Flat area. The goal of the external peer review was to provide technical evaluation of the studies and to assist in assessing the readiness of the UGTA subproject to progress to monitoring activities for further model evaluation. The external peer review team consisted of six independent technical experts with expertise in geology, hydrogeology,'''groundwater modeling, and radiochemistry. The peer review team was tasked with addressing the following questions: 1. Are the modeling approaches, assumptions, and model results for Frenchman Flat consistent with the use of modeling studies as a decision tool for resolution of environmental and regulatory requirements? 2. Do the modeling results adequately account for uncertainty in models of flow and transport in the Frenchman Flat hydrological setting? a. Are the models of sufficient scale/resolution to adequately predict contaminant transport in the Frenchman Flat setting? b. Have all key processes been included in the model? c. Are the methods used to forecast contaminant boundaries from the transport modeling studies reasonable and appropriate? d. Are the assessments of uncertainty technically sound and consistent with state-of-the-art approaches currently used in the hydrological sciences? 3. Are the datasets and modeling results adequate for a transition to Corrective Action Unit monitoring studiesthe next stage in the UGTA strategy for Frenchman Flat? The peer review team is of the opinion that, with some limitations, the modeling approaches, assumptions, and model results are consistent with the use of modeling studies for resolution of environmental and regulatory requirements. The peer review team further finds that the modeling studies have accounted for uncertainty in models of flow and transport in the Frenchman Flat except for a few deficiencies described in the report. Finally, the peer review team concludes that the UGTA subproject has explored a wide range of variations in assumptions, methods, and data, and should proceed to the next stage with an emphasis on monitoring studies. The corrective action strategy, as described in the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, states that the groundwater flow and transport models for each corrective action unit will consider, at a minimum, the following: Alternative hydrostratigraphic framework models of the modeling domain. Uncertainty in the radiological and hydrological source terms. Alternative models of recharge. Alternative boundary conditions and groundwater flows. Multiple permissive sets of calibrated flow models. Probabilistic simulations of transport using plausible sets of alternative framework and recharge models, and boundary and groundwater flows from calibrated flow models. Ensembles of forecasts of contaminant boundaries. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of model outputs. The peer review team finds that these minimum requirements have been met. While the groundwater modeling and uncertainty analyses have been quite detailed, the peer review team has identified several modeling-related issues that should be addressed in the next phase of the corrective action activities: Evaluating and using water-level gradients from the pilot wells at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site in model calibration. Re-evaluating the use of geochemical age-dating data to constrain model calibrations. Developing water budgets for the alluvial and upper volcanic aquifer systems in Frenchman Flat. Considering modeling approaches in which calculated groundwater flow directions near the water table are not predetermined by model boundary conditions and areas of recharge, all of which are very uncertain. Evaluating local-scale variations in hydraulic conductivity on the calculated contaminant boundaries. Evaluat

Sam Marutzky

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

ORISE: Enhancing Peer Review Tools and Services to Support DOE...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to specific presentations prior to the five-day U.S. Department of Energy's Hydrogen Fuel Cells and Vehicle Technologies annual program evaluation and review-the largest for...

270

Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Documents (Documented Safety Analyses and Technical Safety Requirements)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 1996 February 1996 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 2 Date November 2005 DOE STANDARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS DOCUMENTS (DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES AND TECHNICAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS) U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, Fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Adminis tration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000.

271

ORISE: Coordinating Scientific Peer Reviews to Advance Energy Efficiency  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Efficiency Energy Efficiency ORISE Reviews and Evaluates Technologies that Advance Energy Efficiency ORISE Reviews and Evaluates Technologies that Advance Energy Efficiency In addition to renewable energy and changes in individual behavior, energy efficiency is generally achieved through the development of more efficient technologies. Buildings are being constructed with more energy efficient systems, fluorescent light bulbs are replacing incandescent lights, and new vehicle technologies are enabling America to use less petroleum. The Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE) realizes that energy efficiency encompasses a wide spectrum of industries and supports the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in its mission to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil.

272

2012 CERTS Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

R&M Review R&M Review August 7-8, 2012 Cornell University Statler Hotel 130 Statler Drive | Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 257-2500 Day 1: August 7, 2011 The meeting will be held in the Statler Hotel (Yale/Princeton conference rooms) 8:30 Continental Breakfast (Conference Foyer 2) 9:00 Introductions and overview - Bob Thomas 9:15 DOE Vision/Priorities/Future Directions - Phil Overholt 9:30 #1: Transmission Investment Assessment under Uncertainty About Fuel Prices, Technology, Renewables Penetration and Market Responses Using a Multi-Stage Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse Ben Hobbs, Dick Schuler, Francisco Munoz 10:15 #2: Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch And Distributed Resource Aggregation Pravin Varaiya, Felix Wu, K. Poolla, Anand Subramanian

273

2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Puesh Kumar, American Public Power Association  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 San Diego, CA Puesh M. Kumar Director of Engineering & Operations Public Power and APPA * Public power: operated by local governments; reliable, responsive, not-for-profit * 2,000 community-owned electric utilities, 46 million people * Non-profit, non-partisan organization, est. 1940 - Public policy interests - Member services - Reliable electricity at reasonable prices - Proper protection of the environment Public Power in the US 63 648 384 340 308 133 80 30 22 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Less than 10 11 to 1,000 1,001 to 2,000 2,001 to 4000 4,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 20,000 20,001 to 40,000 40,001 - 100,000 More than 100,000 Customers Ser ved Public Power by Number of Customers Served DEED * Demonstration of Energy Efficient Developments * Created in 1980

274

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review and Update Meeting | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Update Meeting and Update Meeting Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review and Update Meeting The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions; the agenda is available below. Presentations are available through the individual session links. Presentations Day 1 Session 1: Chaired by Imre Gyuk, DOE Session 2: Chaired by Ron Staubly, NETL Session 3: Chaired by Bill Capp, Grid Storage Consulting Poster Session: National Lab Projects | ARPA-E Projects Day 2 Session 1: Chaired by Tony Martino, SNL Session 2: Chaired by Ross Guttromson, SNL Session 3: Chaired by Stan Atcitty, SNL Poster Session: SBIR Projects | University Projects | ARRA Projects

275

Criteria Review and Approach Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight » Safety & Emergency Management Evaluations Oversight » Safety & Emergency Management Evaluations » Criteria Review and Approach Documents Criteria Review and Approach Documents June 10, 2009 CRAD, Performance Based Inspection - June 9, 2009 Performance Based Inspection of Worker Safety and Health Utilizing the ISM Core Functions: Inspection Criteria, Approach, and Lines of Inquiry, (HSS CRAD 64-10, Rev. 2) June 1, 2009 CRAD, Nuclear Facility Construction - Structural Steel, May 29, 2009 Nuclear Facility Construction - Structural Steel (HSS CRAD 64-16, Rev. 0) June 1, 2009 CRAD, Nuclear Facility Construction - Structural Concrete, May 29, 2009 Nuclear Facility Construction - Structural Concrete (HSS CRAD 64-15, Rev. 0) February 11, 2009 CRAD, Federal Assurance Capability Plan - February 11, 2009

276

SQA Site Assessments and Criteria Review and Approach Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SQA Site Assessments and Criteria Review and Approach Documents SQA Site Assessments and Criteria Review and Approach Documents DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for use with 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, was issued June 17. 2005. This Guide, referred to as the DOE Safety Software Quality Assurance (SSQA) Guide, includes Appendix F, a Criteria Review and Approach Document (CRAD) associated with the SSQA requirements in DOE O 414.1C. The criteria in the CRAD apply to all safety software regardless of the safety software definition or software type (acquired or custom). The Lines of Inquiry associated with the CRAD should be customized to fit the DOE approved graded approach and ASME NQA-1-2000 or a standard with an equivalent level of SQA requirements approved by DOE. Since the graded approach and standard(s) approved can vary from site-to-site, there is no single set of Lines of Inquiry that could be developed that would be applicable to all sites.

277

Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1045_Peer Reviews Panel_Lehman Workshop Briefing w-headings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Science Science Peer Reviews 101 Daniel R. Lehman, Director Office of Project Assessment Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Peer Review 101 Panel Members Mr. Daniel Lehman, Director, Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Mr. Hanley Lee, Deputy Manager, SLAC Site Office (formerly SC Federal Project Director for the LCLS Project) Mr. James Krupnick, Associate Lab. Director/Chief Operating Officer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (formerly Project Director for the Molecular Foundry Project) Mr. Scott Samuelson, PMP Acting Director, NNSA Office of Major Systems Acquisitions (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) Office of Science Peer Reviews 101 (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) 2 Office of Science Peer Reviews 101

278

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report (Book)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The fiscal year (FY) 2013 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), in conjunction with DOE's Vehicle Technologies Office AMR, was held from May 13-16, 2013, at the Crystal City Marriott and Crystal Gateway Marriott in Arlington, Virginia. This report is a summary of comments by AMR peer reviewers about the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE).

Not Available

2013-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

279

PEER REVIEWED  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

restaurant initiative to increase availability of healthy menu options in Somerville, Massachusetts:

unknown authors

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Second Generation Emissions Study - Rick Fioravanti, DNV KEMA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

number 2012 DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review Second Generation Emissions Study Washington, DC September 26 - 28, 2012 Original KEMA Study on Emission Benefits  Study was conducted in 2007 and compared a flywheel to traditional technologies - Study highlights - Showed emission savings from utilization of storage - Study provided a simple "snapshot" of potential trends - Compared a flywheel to natural gas, coal, and pumped hydro systems - Methodology "vetted" at 2007 EESAT Conference - Next steps called for a "deeper dive into actual performance numbers - Actual simulations of specific ISO  Today, study is still cited as the main "Emission " Study for such applications - Results referenced in many cases as a secondary benefit of storage systems

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

2010 DOE Peer Review Update Conference LIST OF ATTENDEES Last Name First Name Organization Country  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2/2010 2/2010 1 2010 DOE Peer Review Update Conference LIST OF ATTENDEES Last Name First Name Organization Country Aalmans Luc General Compression USA Adams Michael Constellation Energy USA Agar Ertan Drexel University USA Agrawal Poonum Sentech, Inc USA Ahmed Jasim BOSCH USA Akhil Abbas Sandia National Laboratories USA Alexander Iwan Case Western Reserve University USA Alexander Jane USA Amy Fabrice Air Products USA Anderson Dianne Case Western Reserve University USA Anderson Travis Sandia National Laboratories USA Andrews George Oak Ridge National Laboratory USA Arseneaux James Beacon Power Corporation USA Aselage Terrence Sandia National Laboratories USA Asgeirsson Haukur DTE Energy USA Atcitty Stan Sandia National Laboratories USA

282

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Amber Kinetics Flywheel Energy Storage Demo - Ed Chiao, Amber Kinetics  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

amber_kinetics amber_kinetics DOE Peer Review September 2012 Ed Chiao, CEO amber_kinetics Amber Kinetics: Our Flywheel History Start-up launched in 2009, Stanford University Cleantech Entrepreneurship class Established a technology licensing & flywheel development partnership with LLNL; Amber Kinetics identified new material & lower-cost rotor designs for commercialization Awarded a Smart Grid Energy Storage Demonstration grant award for flywheels Awarded a matching grant for development & demonstration of flywheel technology Stanford University Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy California Energy Commission World-class institutions | innovative, deep flywheel technology owned by Amber Amber Kinetics, Inc. - Confidential and Proprietary, All Rights Reserved

283

Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Discovery of Uranium Discovery of Uranium Uranium was discovered in 1789 by Martin Klaproth, a German chemist, who isolated an oxide of uranium while analyzing pitchblende samples from the Joachimsal silver mines in the former Kingdom of Bohemia located in the present day Czech Republic. more facts >> Mailing List Signup Receive e-mail updates about this project and web site. your e-mail address Sign Me Up Search: OK Button DUF6 Guide DU Uses DUF6 Management and Uses DUF6 Conversion EIS Documents News FAQs Internet Resources Glossary Home » Documents Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Depleted UF6 Management Program Documents Downloadable documents about depleted UF6 management and related topics, including Depleted UF6 Conversion and Programmatic EIS documents

284

Microsoft Word - A-14-09-29169 Final DOE Peer Review Ltr.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION BALTIMORE, MD 21235-0001 March 5, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HONORABLE GREGORY H. FRIEDMAN INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SUBJECT: Department of Energy Peer Review for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2009 The attached report presents the results of our external quality control review of the Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General, Office of Audit Services. Your response to the draft report is included as Appendix B. We thank you and your staff for the assistance and cooperation provided during our review. If you have any questions or would like to discuss the report, please call me, or have your staff contact Steven L. Schaeffer, Assistant Inspector General for Audit, at

285

Council Document ISRP 2000-2A Review of the Columbia River Basin  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

#12;Peer Review Group Members for FY2000 Review Richard Alldredge, Washington State University Peter of Montana Thomas Quinn, University of Washington Andrew Sheldon, University of Montana Si Simenstead, University of Washington Alan Springer, University of Alaska Gilbert Sylvia, Hatfield Marine Science Center

286

DOE Hydrogen Program 2004 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This document summarizes the project evaluations and comments from the DOE Hydrogen Program 2004 Annual Program Review. Hydrogen production, delivery and storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; and education R&D projects funded by DOE in FY2004 are reviewed.

Not Available

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

287

Assessment of Financial Savings from Peer Reviews of In-Progress Projects: A Case Study from the Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Results of a study to assess the financial savings to the Department of Energys (DOE) Hydrogen Program due to decisions made from peer reviews.

288

SECA CTP Peer Review Oct. 25-26, 2003 Review Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Components 11 * Modeling 3 * Balance of Plant 2 Topical Area Reviewed 0 20 40 60 80 Percentage Materials & Cell Components Modeling Balance of Plant Review Results Materials &...

289

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

558 Federal Register 558 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 203 / Thursday, October 22, 2009 / Notices If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339. VIII. Other Information Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed under For Further Information Contact in Section VII of this notice. Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ fedregister. To use PDF, you must have Adobe

290

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5R1 Guide for Developing Data Quality Objectives for Ecological Risk Assessment at DOE Oak Ridge Operations Facilities This document has been approved by the K-25 Site Technical...

291

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

44 Federal Register 44 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2011 / Notices not anticipate recurrence of violations that gave rise to this PDL. As a result, under the authority in 20 U.S.C. 1234a(j), the Department has determined that compromise of this claim to $675,000 is appropriate. The public is invited to comment on the Department's intent to compromise this claim. Additional information may be obtained by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ fedregister. To use PDF you must have

292

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Online links at http: www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet access who will eFile a document andor be listed as a contact for an intervenor must...

293

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the EIS and requests to be added to the document mailing list should be addressed to: Dr. Jerry Pell, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20), U.S. Department...

294

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

compliance with Commission submission guidelines at http: www.ferc.govhelpsubmission- guide.asp. Comments may be eFiled. The eFiling option under the Documents & Filings tab on...

295

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: NSTAR Automated Mater Reading Based Dynamic Pricing - Douglas Horton, NSTAR Electric & Gas  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting AMR Based Dynamic Pricing y g Doug Horton NSTAR Electric & Gas Co. 6/8/2012 AMR Based Dynamic Pricing Objective Provide two-way communication of electricity cost & consumption data utilizing the customers existing meter & Internet. Goal to achieve 5% reduction in peak and Goal to achieve 5% reduction in peak and average load. Life-cycle Funding ($K) Total Budget Total DOE Funding to Technical Scope Use customer's existing AMR meter and broadband Internet to achieve two way Total Budget Total DOE Funding Funding to Date $4,900k $2,362k $1,623k broadband Internet to achieve two way communication and "AMI" functionality Cutting-edge solution to integrate: * Existing meters E i ti I t t December 2008 * Existing Internet * Existing billing & CIS

296

2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC - Tom Rizy, ORNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

g g Peer Review Meeting Smart Inverter Controls & Microgrid Interoperation at the Distributed Energy Communications & Controls (DECC) Lab ( ) D. Tom Rizy Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) June 7 th 2012 June 7 th , 2012 Smart Inverter (SI) Controls and Microgrid (MG) Interoperation Microgrid (MG) Interoperation Objectives * D l d SI l f l i l DECC Microgrid * Develop and test SI controls for multiple renewable/nonrenewable DER. * Develop MG controls and communication requirements for high penetration DER. * I l t MG t DECC L b Technical Scope * Implement MG at DECC Lab. * Transfer technology to industry. Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) Prior to FY12 FY13 Out- Technical Scope * Develop advanced smart inverter control consisting of local droop (P-f, Q-V) control integrated with secondary closed

297

Presentation-SNL_RICA-CEDS_Peer_Review_v2a.pptx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems Systems 2010 Peer Review Alexandria, VA July 20-22, 2010 Co-PI: Jason Stamp, Ph.D. Co-PI: Laurie Phillips Sandia National Laboratories Reliability Impacts for Cyber Attack (RICA) Summary Slide: Reliability Impacts for Cyber Attack (RICA) Outcomes:
Quan&ta&ve
impact
analysis of
cyber
a5acks
against
power
grid control
systems
(that
affect
grid
topology and
opera&ons),
including
poten&al mi&ga&on
steps,
using
reliability
metrics. Analyze
large-scale
cases
using
simula&on soCware
in
a
High-Performance Compu&ng
(HPC)
environment. Roadmap
Challenges:
Develop
evidence- based
business
case
to
increase
and shape
investment
in
control
system security.

298

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LIPA Smart Energy Corridor Project - Ming Mui, LIPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting DE-OE0000220 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Ming Mui and Sunil Katwala June 8, 2012 December 2008 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) Fiscal Years 2010 to 2015 DOE Funding $ 12,496K Total Project Cost $ 25,293K* Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) * Additional funding from LIPA and SUNY Research Foundation Smart Energy Corridor will: (1) Validate Smart Grid technologies; (2) Quantify Smart Grid costs and benefits; (3) Validate Smart Grid applications at a scale that can be readily adapted and replicated in individual homes and businesses. * Demonstrate Technolgy (DA, Sub Auto, AMI, DLC) * Marketing (TOU Rates, Webtools, Visualization) * Cyber Security (Vulneribility Testing & Hardening)

299

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance for ESS - Vilayanur Viswanathan, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance for Energy Storage Systems D. Conover, V. Viswanathan, K. Bray and M. Kintner-Meyer (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) D. Schoenwald, D. Rose, and S. Ferreira (Sandia National Laboratory) September 28, 2012 USDOE-OE ESS Peer Review Washington, DC Dr. Imre Gyuk - Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Problem Statement The energy storage market is expanding, with a variety of storage technologies available The lack of a uniform way to evaluate energy storage system (ESS) performance is causing confusion in the market Without an accepted basis for comparing ESS performance, the application and use of storage technology will be hampered

300

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Nitrogen-Oxygen Battery for Large Scale Energy Storage - Frank Delnick, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program Peer Review, Washington, DC Sept. 26-28, 2012 Frank Delnick, David Ingersoll, Karen Waldrip, Peter Feibelman Nitrogen/Oxygen Battery A Transformational Architecture for Large Scale Energy Storage Power Sources Technology Group Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM SAND2012-7881P N 2 /O 2 Battery Project Overview  Air/Air battery.  N 2 electrochemistry enables the redefinition of a gas (diffusion) electrode and the three phase interface.  Operated as redox flow battery.  Provide a very high energy density, very low cost, environmentally benign electrochemical platform for load leveling and for grid-integrated storage of energy generated by wind, solar and other sustainable but intermittent sources.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium Intercalation Battery for Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012 David Ofer Ofer.david@tiaxllc.com Washington DC, September 27, 2012 Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Background and Purpose 2 Large-scale stationary energy storage for integration with renewables and for off-peak energy capture is a new application requiring new rechargeable batteries. * New combination of requirements - Long cycle life under deep cycling use profile - High cycling efficiency - Moderate rate capability - Very low cost - No requirement for particularly high specific energy or energy density * TIAX is developing a novel Na-ion battery - Leverages teachings of Li-ion technology - Targets novel low-cost chemistry and cell design

302

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Photos placed in Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project September 28, 2012 Jim Ellison, Verne Loose, Ray Byrne, Cesar Silva Monroy, and Ryan Elliott Sandia National Laboratories Leigh Tesfatsion Iowa State University DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review 2012 Introduction - Motivation for a New Market Design  Need to eliminate market bias of resource classes such as Energy Storage  Need to accommodate new technologies, without the need to change market rules  Move away from resource-centric markets toward service-centric markets

303

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium-based Battery Development - Dave Ingersoll, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium-based Battery Development Sodium-based Battery Development A Family of Batteries for Large Scale Energy Storage D. Ingersoll, C. Apblett, E. Spoerke, K. Zavadil, R. Cygan, J. Ihlefeld, F. Delnick, & T. Anderson Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM Prof. E. Wachsman University of Maryland, College Park, MD Profs. R. Kee & J. Porter, Dr. H. Zhu Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO S. Bhavaraju & M. Robins Ceramatec, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT D. Beeaff CoorsTek, Inc, Golden, CO J. Martin Boulder Ionics, Golden CO US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program Peer Review, Washington, DC, Sept. 26-28, 2012 Sodium-based batteries  Purpose  Demonstrate a family of sodium-based battery chemistries  sodium-iodine, sodium-bromine, sodium-air, sodium insertion, sodium-metal, etc

304

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wind Firming EnergyFarm - Tom Stepien, Primus Power  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wind Firming EnergyFarm DOE Peer Review September 26, 2012 2 Primus Power is on track to deliver EnergyPods TM to California's Modesto Irrigation District starting 2014 EnergyPod TM 250 kW  1 MWh PowerBox Supports 8 EnergyPods TM 3 How will storage integrate into Modesto's system? Modesto's daily load ? Storage Hydro Coal & Gas Wind Solar 4 Modesto's 25 MW McHenry solar farm 5 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and solar energy 25 MW McHenry Solar Farm 6 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and solar energy 25 MW McHenry Solar Farm 8.7 MW up in 15 min 15 MW down in 15 min 4-Aug-12 7 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and

305

CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Iowa Stored Energy Park DOE Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review Fairmont Hotel Washington, DC September 29, 2008 Kent Holst, Development Director Iowa Stored Energy Park Funding: Congressional Ear-mark CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Today's Presentation Past Present Future Funding CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE c CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Iowa's municipal utilities saw this. 1. Economic feasibility studies. 2. Geologic research. 3. Computer modeling. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Will ISEP make money? 1. Missouri River Energy Services. 2. Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Next steps: 1. Drill two test wells. 2. Pump tests, water & air. 3. Refine computer modeling. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Funding 1. Municipal utilities -$1.15 million. 2. DOE - $6 million. 3. Iowa Power Fund - $3.2 million.

306

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluating Utility Owned Evaluating Utility Owned Electric Energy Storage Systems: A Perspective for State Electric Utility Regulators DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review 2012 September 28, 2012 Dhruv Bhatnagar & Verne Loose Sandia National Laboratories Motivation for this Work  Many state utility regulatory bodies are unfamiliar with electric energy storage systems  The technology  The functional uses  The value of these uses to the grid  This leads to a handicap in their proper evaluation for rate base  May prevent the best (economic) technologies from system integration 2 Source: GE What we are doing  Developing a guidebook:  Inform regulators about the system benefits of energy storage  Identify regulatory challenges to increased

307

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

988 Federal Register 988 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rulemakings. In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to http:// www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm. Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the Commission's calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/ EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related information.

308

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

xxxvi | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Hydrogen Production and Delivery ........................................................................................................... 7 PD-014: Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Analysis .................................................................................. 10 PD-022: Fiber-Reinforced Composite Pipelines ........................................................................................ 14 PD-025: Hydrogen Embrittlement of Structural Steels .............................................................................. 20

309

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ANALYSIS ANALYSIS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 465 2013 - Systems Analysis Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Systems Analysis Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Systems Analysis Program: The reviewers considered the Systems Analysis program to be an essential component of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program's (the Program's) mission. The projects were considered to be appropriately diverse and focused on addressing technical barriers and meeting targets. In general, the reviewers noted that the Systems Analysis program is well managed and demonstrated the ability to address immediate analytical needs and overall objectives and plans, especially to implement the new initiative, H

310

Department of Energy Quadrennial Technology Review Framing Document...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A document entailling DOE-QTR and a context and framework for the Department's energy programs, as well as principles by which to establish program plans with...

311

Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Documents...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

institutional programs in Integrated Safety Management System documents and site-wide manuals was added. p. 13 Sect. 3 Approval Bases for Technical Safety Requirements New...

312

Consideration of Cumulative Impacts in EPA Review of NEPA Documents, EPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Consideration of Cumulative Impacts in EPA Review of NEPA Consideration of Cumulative Impacts in EPA Review of NEPA Documents, EPA Office of Federal Activities Consideration of Cumulative Impacts in EPA Review of NEPA Documents, EPA Office of Federal Activities The purpose of this guidance is to assist EPA reviewers of NEPA documents in providing accurate, realistic, and consistent comments on the assessment of cumulative impacts. The guidance focuses on specific issues that are critical in EPA's review of NEPA documents under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. G-EPA-cumulative_impacts.pdf More Documents & Publications Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents Considering Cumulative Effects Under the National Environmental Policy Act DRAFT NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change and

313

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2004 Marketing Plan, is an entity that has executed a BR contract and is allocated a percentage of the BR. The FP percentages are reviewed during March of each year; and if the...

314

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

951 Federal Register 951 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Notices Act, judicial review of this final action may be sought only in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Petitions for review must be filed by September 28, 2010. Judicial review of this final action may not be obtained in subsequent enforcement proceedings, pursuant to section 307(b)(2) of the Act. As with past authorization and waiver decisions, this action is not a rule as defined by Executive Order 12866. Therefore, it is exempt from review by the Office of Management and Budget as required for rules and regulations by Executive Order 12866. In addition, this action is not a rule as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601(2). Therefore, EPA has

315

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Federal Register 0 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/ news/fedregister. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ index.html. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a; 21 U.S.C. 862(a)(1). Dated: November 10, 2010. James F. Manning, Chief of Staff, Federal Student Aid, U.S. Department of Education. [FR Doc. 2010-28856 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [OE Docket No. PP-371]

316

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

667 Federal Register 667 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 3, 2009 / Notices Part 1 Chapter 3 of the TGDC Recommendations, with the exception of Chapter 3's performance benchmark requirements. Part 1 Chapter 3 of the TGDC Recommendations is primarily a maintenance level upgrade to the 2005 VVSG with minor modifications, clarifications, and a few additions including performance and poll worker usability requirements. (The VSS 2002 contained almost no usability, accessibility, and privacy requirements. As a result, the 2005 VVSG Section 3 was mostly new material based on research, best practices, and standards relating to human factors and the design of user interfaces as they apply to voting systems.) 7. System Security Documentation Requirements-Security documentation

317

Physics Procedia 34 (2012) 70 79 1875-3892 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of the Organising Committee of the CSP 2012  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

/or peer review under responsibility of the Organising Committee of the CSP 2012 Conference. doi:10.1016/j

Berthier, Ludovic

319

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28 Federal Register 28 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2011 / Notices information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any agency's ability to perform its statutory obligations. The Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the information collection. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5)

320

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

52841 52841 Vol. 67, No. 157 Wednesday, August 14, 2002 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Federal Crop Insurance Corporation 7 CFR Part 457 Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Sugarcane Crop Insurance Provisions AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA. ACTION: Final rule; correction. SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final rule, Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Sugarcane Crop Insurance Provisions that the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation published in the Federal Register on Friday, July 12, 2002 (67 FR 46093- 46096). EFFECTIVE DATE: August 14, 2002. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arden Routh, Risk Management Specialist, Product Development Division, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, United States Department of Agriculture, 6501 Beacon Drive,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

VALIDATION VALIDATION 380 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Technology Validation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Technology Validation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Technology Validation Program: In general, the reviewers believed the program area was adequately covered. The role of the Technology Validation program within the structure of the Fuel Cell Technologies Office was clearly identified. Progress relating to projects was clearly presented and plans were identified for addressing issues and challenges. The partnership with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL's) data collection/analysis team was seen as key to the success

322

Energy Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy¬タルs 2010 Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review July 29, 2010 The Department of Energy conducted a Peer Review of its Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) Research and Development Program on July 20-22, during which 28 R&D projects were presented for review by industry stakeholders. More than 65 energy sector stakeholders came to network, present, and learn about DOE projects, while more than 20 joined in by webinar. The CEDS program's national lab, academic, and industry partners-including the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) partners and Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) project- presented DOE-supported efforts involving secured SCADA communications and smart grid applications,

323

Report of the Peer Review Panel on the early site suitability evaluation of the Potential Repository Site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada; Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Yucca mountain Site Characterization Project Office (YMPO) assigned Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), the Technical and Management Support Services (T&MSS) contractor to the YmPo, the task of conducting an Early Site Suitability Evaluation (ESSE) of the Yucca mountain site as a potential site for a high-level radioactive waste repository. First, the assignment called for the development of a method to evaluate a single site against the DOE General Guidelines for Recommendation of Sites for Nuclear Waste Repositories, 10 CFR Part 960. Then, using this method, an evaluation team, the ESSE Core Team, of senior YMP scientists, engineers, and technical experts, evaluated new information obtained about the site since publication of the final Environmental Assessment (DOE, 1986) to determine if new suitability/unsuitability findings could be recommended. Finally, the Core Team identified further information and analyses needed to make final determinations for each of the guidelines. As part of the task, an independent peer review of the ESSE report has been conducted. Expertise was solicited that covered the entire spectrum of siting guidelines in 10 CFR Part 960 in order to provide a complete, in-depth critical review of the data evaluated and cited in the ESSE report, the methods used to evaluate the data, and the conclusions and recommendations offered by the report. Fourteen nationally recognized technical experts (Table 2) served on the Peer Review Panel. The comments from the Panel and the responses prepared by the ESSE Core Team, documented on formal Comment Response Forms, constitute the body of this document.

NONE

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

60 Federal Register 60 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 235 / Friday, December 5, 2008 / Notices use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1- 800-877-8339. [FR Doc. E8-28765 Filed 12-4-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Department of Education. SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before January 5, 2009. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,

325

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

586 586 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 1999 / Notices Telephone: (202) 205-9817. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1- 800-877-8339. However, the Department is not able to reproduce in an alternate format the standard forms included in the application package. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sylvia Johnson, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW. (room 3318, Switzer Building), Washington, DC 20202-2649. Telephone (202) 205-9312. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1- 800-877-8339. Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print,

326

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

May 22, 2000 Part III Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 261 Regulatory Determination on Wastes from the Combustion of Fossil Fuels; Final Rule VerDate 112000 16:01 May 19, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\22MYR3.SGM pfrm02 PsN: 22MYR3 32214 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 99 / Monday, May 22, 2000 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 261 [FRL-6588-1] RIN 2050-AD91 Notice of Regulatory Determination on Wastes From the Combustion of Fossil Fuels AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Regulatory determination. SUMMARY: This document explains EPA's determination of whether regulation of fossil fuel combustion wastes is warranted under subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Today's action

327

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

945 Federal Register 945 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices 1 The full text of the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage is available at http://www.iaea.org/Publication/ Documents/Infircs/1998/infcirc567.shtml. A detailed interpretation of the CSC and its provisions is contained in ''The 1997 Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage and the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage-Explanatory Texts,'' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (''Explanatory Texts''). International Law Series No. 3 (2007). The Explanatory Texts is available at http://www- pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/ Pub1279_web.pdf . 2 SDR is the unit of account defined by the International Monetary Fund (''IMF'') and used by

328

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51 Federal Register 51 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2011 / Notices VII. Agency Contact See chart in the Award Information section in this notice for the name, room number and telephone number of the contact person for each competition. You can write to the contact person at the following address: U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2600. If you use a TDD, call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800- 877-8339. VIII. Other Information Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the Grants and Contracts

329

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

902 Federal Register 902 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 15 / Monday, January 25, 2010 / Notices including Comments Resolution Matrixes (CRMs) and track changed documents, will be posted at: http:// www.losangeles.af.mil/library/ factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9364. Please send all CRM comments to Vimal Gopal by 5 February 2010. DATES: 12 February 2010: IS-GPS-200E. 8 a.m.-12 p.m. (Pacific Time). Dial-In Information: Phone: 1-800- FON-SAIC (1-800-366-7242). Code: 4511074. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vimal Gopal, vimal.gopal.ctr@losangeles.af.mil, 1- 310-909-7294 or Captain Neal Roach, neal.roach@losangeles.af.mil, 1-310- 653-3771. Bao-Anh Trinh, Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 2010-1273 Filed 1-22-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-05-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

330

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

79 Federal Register 79 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices of a portion of National Guard Avenue to meet recommended stand-off distance between perimeter fence and mission critical resources and personnel). The decision was based on matters discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Proposed Realignment of National Guard Avenue and New Main Gate Construction, inputs from the public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final EIS was made available to the public on August 13, 2010 through a NOA in the Federal Register (Volume 75, Number 156, Page 49487) with a wait period that ended on September 14, 2010. The ROD documents only the decision of the Air Force with respect to the proposed Air Force actions analyzed

331

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 79 / Thursday, April 24, 2003 / Notices j. Deadline for filing comments and/ or motions: May 19, 2003. All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with: Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Please include the project number (P- 10855-005) on any comments or motions filed. k. Description of Request: Upper Peninsula Power Company (UPPCO) proposes to add additional acreage to the project boundary in the area of the Emergency Fuse Plug. The additional acres are necessary for project operations. l. Location of the Application: A copy of the application is available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference Room,

332

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

July 2, 2008 Part V The President Executive Order 13467-Reforming Processes Related to Suitability for Government Employment, Fitness for Contractor Employees, and Eligibility for Access to Classified National Security Information VerDate Aug2005 18:32 Jul 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\02JYE0.SGM 02JYE0 hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS2 VerDate Aug2005 18:32 Jul 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\02JYE0.SGM 02JYE0 hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS2 Presidential Documents 38103 Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 128 Wednesday, July 2, 2008 Title 3- The President Executive Order 13467 of June 30, 2008 Reforming Processes Related to Suitability for Government Employment, Fitness for Contractor Employees, and Eligi-

333

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

34 Federal Register 34 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Notices public an opportunity to comment on the Guidance Memoranda prior to their approval. On May 6, 2005, a Notice of Availability was placed in the Federal Register (70 FR 24008) inviting the public to comment on the final draft of the Guidance Memoranda. As a result of public comment we received on the final draft, we have revised the Guidance Memoranda and invite the public to comment on the revised final draft. The programmatic regulations also require the concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior and the Governor of Florida on the Guidance Memoranda prior to their approval. An electronic copy of the guidance memoranda document is available at: http:// www.evergladesplan.org/pm/

334

Document  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

44786 Federal Register 44786 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 148 / Thursday, July 31, 2008 / Notices same file as the submission itself, and not as separate files. Petitions will be available for public inspection by appointment with the staff of the USTR Public Reading Room, except for information granted ''business confidential'' status pursuant to 15 CFR 2003.6. If the submission contains business confidential information, a non-confidential version of the submission must also be submitted that indicates where confidential information was redacted by inserting asterisks where material was deleted. In addition, the confidential submission must be clearly marked ''BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL'' in large, bold letters at the top and bottom of every page of the documents. The public version that does not contain

335

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Federal Register 2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2011 / Notices it is recommended that documents be transmitted by overnight mail, by electronic mail to Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov, or by facsimile to 202-586-8008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Lawrence (Program Office) 202-586-5260. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exports of electricity from the United States to a foreign country are regulated by the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to sections 301(b) and 402(f) of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7151(b), 7172(f)) and require authorization under section 202(e) of the FPA (16 U.S.C.824a(e)). On August 31, 1999 the Department of Energy (DOE) issued Order No. EA-216, which authorized TEMUS to transmit electric energy from the United States to

336

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

945 Federal Register 945 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices 1 The full text of the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage is available at http://www.iaea.org/Publication/ Documents/Infircs/1998/infcirc567.shtml. A detailed interpretation of the CSC and its provisions is contained in ''The 1997 Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage and the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage-Explanatory Texts,'' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (''Explanatory Texts''). International Law Series No. 3 (2007). The Explanatory Texts is available at http://www- pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/ Pub1279_web.pdf . 2 SDR is the unit of account defined by the International Monetary Fund (''IMF'') and used by

337

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5/R3 5/R3 Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Terrestrial Plants: 1997 Revision This document has been approved by the East Tennessee Technology Park Technical Information Office for release to the public. Date: ES/ER/TM-85/R3 Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Terrestrial Plants: 1997 Revision R. A. Efroymson M. E. Will G. W. Suter II A. C. Wooten Date Issued-November 1997 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management under budget and reporting code EW 20 LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. managing the Environmental Management Activities at the East Tennessee Technology Park Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Oak Ridge National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant

338

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

197 Federal Register 197 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 117 / Friday, June 19, 2009 / Notices Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings. Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/ Information Management Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 22209-2133. Dated: May 31, 2009.

339

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

05 Federal Register 05 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 16, 2008 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Department of Education. ACTION: Correction Notice. SUMMARY: On January 9, 2008, the Department of Education published a comment period notice in the Federal Register (Page 1609, Column 3) for the information collection, ''Common Core of Data Survey System.'' The abstract is hereby corrected to read, ''The Common Core of Data fiscal data collection gathers universe information from states about public school districts and schools. Information is collected annually from school districts about the districts and their members schools.'' The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services,

340

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

49 Federal Register 49 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Notices with any agency's ability to perform its statutory obligations. The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes that notice containing proposed information collection requests prior to submission of these requests to OMB. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

17 Federal Register 17 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 25, 2009 / Notices consistent with legislated activities and to determine the dollar share of the Congressional appropriation to be awarded to successful applicants. This information collection is being submitted under the Streamlined Clearance Process for Discretionary Grant Information Collections (1894- 0001). Therefore, the 30-day public comment period notice will be the only public comment notice published for this information collection. Requests for copies of the information collection submission for OMB review may be accessed from http:// edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ''Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number 3958. When you access the information collection,

342

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

986 Federal Register 986 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Notices Washington, DC 20202-4537. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be considered public records. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that Federal agencies provide interested parties an early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. The Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the information collection. The Department of Education is especially interested in

343

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Federal Register 6 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 10, 2009 / Notices opportunity to comment on information collection requests. OMB may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the extent that public participation in the approval process would defeat the purpose of the information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any agency's ability to perform its statutory obligations. The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes that notice containing proposed information collection requests prior to submission of these requests to OMB. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested,

344

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61 Federal Register 61 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 900 RIN 1901-AB18 Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and opportunity for comment. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to amend an interim final rule published elsewhere in today's Federal Register that establishes procedures for DOE coordination of all applicable Federal authorizations for the siting of interstate electric transmission facilities and related environmental reviews pursuant to section 216(h) of the Federal Power Act (FPA). This proposed rule would clarify a provision

345

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

466 Federal Register 466 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Notices approximately 130 monitors, which will result in the addition of 66 respondents. What Is the Next Step in the Process for This ICR? EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Dated: October 5, 2009. Ronald Fraass,

346

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

75 Federal Register 75 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Indian Affairs Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 1813, Draft Report to Congress AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Publication of Draft Report to Congress. SUMMARY: Section 1813 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-58) requires the Department of the Interior and the Department of Energy (Departments) to jointly conduct a study of issues related to energy rights-of-way (ROWs) on tribal lands. The Act further directs the Departments to submit a report to Congress on the findings of the study. The Draft Report to Congress is available for review on the Section 1813 Web site (http://1813.anl.gov). The Departments will hold several

347

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

716 Federal Register 716 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Notices Information Management and Privacy Services, Office of Management, invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13). DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before May 18, 2011. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Education Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, be faxed to (202) 395-5806 or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov with a cc: to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be

348

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

811 Federal Register 811 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 43 / Friday, March 6, 2009 / Notices the Defense Department Advisory Committee on Women in the Services. Individuals submitting a written statement must submit their statement to the Point of Contact listed above at the address detailed above NLT 5 p.m., Thursday, March 19, 2009. If a written statement is not received by Thursday, March 19, 2009, prior to the meeting, which is the subject of this notice, then it may not be provided to or considered by the Defense Department Advisory Committee on Women in the Services until its next open meeting. The Designated Federal Officer will review all timely submissions with the Defense Department Advisory Committee on Women in the Services Chairperson and ensure they are provided to the

349

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 Federal Register 5 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices Submission Requirements: (a) A test publisher must comply with the requirements in § 462.11 of the NRS regulations when submitting an application. (b) In accordance with § 462.10 of the NRS regulations, the deadline for transmittal of applications is October 1, 2010. (c) Whether you submit your application by mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier) or you hand deliver (or use a courier service) your application, you must mail or deliver three copies of your application, on or before the deadline date, to the following address: NRS Assessment Review, c/o American Institutes for Research, 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007. (d) If you submit your application by

350

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

56811 Federal Register 56811 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 190 / Tuesday, September 30, 2008 / Notices with the Committee, you may do so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Elena Melchert at the address or telephone number listed above. You must make your request for an oral statement at least five business days prior to the meeting, and reasonable provisions will be made to include the presentation on the agenda. Public comment will follow the 5 minute rule. Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public review and copying within 60 days at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, Room 1G-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,

351

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29 Federal Register 29 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 212 / Friday, November 2, 2007 / Notices ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER-FRL-6692-6] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 202-564-7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 6, 2007 (72 FR 17156). DRAFT EISs EIS No. 20070286, ERP No. D-BLM- J65331-WY, Kemmerer Field Office Planning Area, Resource Management

352

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

89 Federal Register 89 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 209 / Friday, October 30, 2009 / Notices Abstract: The regulations establish the requirements under which an institution must readmit servicemembers with the same academic status they had at the institution when they last attended before being called to uniformed service. Requests for copies of the information collection submission for OMB review may be accessed from http:// edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ''Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number 4075. When you access the information collection, click on ''Download Attachments '' to view. Written requests for information should be addressed to U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202-4537. Requests may also be electronically

353

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

430 Federal Register 430 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 1, 2011 / Notices Committee may engage the commenter in discussion afterwards. If a person or group requests to make comments in advance, they cannot sign-up to make comments at the meeting. Members of the public will be eligible to make oral comments concerning the reauthorization of the HEA only in accordance with these instructions. The oral comments made will become part of the official record and will be considered by the Department and the NACIQI in their deliberations. Written and Oral Comments Concerning the Agencies/Institutions Scheduled for Review on December 14 and 15, 2011: Two separate Federal Register notices were previously published on August 17, 2011 (76 FR 51014) and [publication date to be

354

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

218 Federal Register 218 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Notices calves three to six months of age may also be biopsy sampled. The original application submitted by the WCNE included a request to conduct research on North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis). At the time of permit issuance, takes for right whales were not authorized. NMFS is now reviewing the right whale portion of the request as an amendment to Permit No. 605-1904. The WCNE requests authorization to harass up to 75 North Atlantic right whales annually during close vessel approaches for photo- identification, behavioral observation, and prey sampling. This work would continue long-term population monitoring to determine status and trends of this species in the North

355

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Federal Register 6 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 17, 2008 / Notices 1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20585-1290; or by fax at 301-903-5492 or by e-mail at Kathy.murphy@hq.doe.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should be directed to the addressees listed above in ADDRESSES. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This package contains: (1) OMB No. 1910- 1800; (2) Package Title: Security; (3) Type of Review: renewal; (4) Purpose: for DOE management to exercise management oversight and control over its contractors; (5) Respondents: 75,858; (6) Estimated Number of Burden Hours: 265,564. Statutory Authority: Department of Energy Organization Act, Public Law 95-91, of

356

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10 Federal Register 10 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations identified by a word and/or topic search, or by the Board docket number. Board decisions will continue to be provided in a widely-used format as future advances in technology occur. (2) Decisions issued prior to January 1, 1992. Decisions rendered by the Board of Veterans' Appeals prior to January 1, 1992, have been indexed to facilitate access to the contents of the decisions (BVA Index I-01-1). The index, which was published quarterly in microfiche form with an annual cumulation, is available for review at Department of Veterans Affairs regional offices and at the Research Center at the Board of Veterans' Appeals in Washington, DC. Information on obtaining a microfiche copy of the index

357

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 10 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations § 5502.105 Agency procedures. (a) The designated agency ethics official or, with the concurrence of the designated agency ethics official, each of the separate agency components of HHS listed in § 5501.102(a) of this chapter may prescribe procedures for the submission and review of each report filed under this part. These procedures may provide for filing extensions, for good cause shown, totaling not more than 90 days. (b) For good cause, the designated agency ethics official may extend the reporting deadlines for reports required under this part during the initial implementation phase for any reporting requirement, without regard to the 90 day maximum specified in paragraph (a)

358

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2004 / Notices V. Application Review Information Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are in 34 CFR 637.32. VI. Award Administration Information 1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notice (GAN). We may also notify you informally. If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, we notify you. 2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify administrative and national policy requirements in the application package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice. We reference the regulations outlining

359

2012 SG Peer Review - SDE&G Borrego Springs Microgrid - Tom Bialek, SDG&E  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting SDG&E Borrego Springs Microgrid Demonstration Project Thomas Bialek, PhD, PE Principal Investigator June 8, 2012 December 2008 Borrego Springs Microgrid Demonstration Project Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) Budget Period 1 FY2008 - FY2010 Budget Period 2 FY2011 - FY2013 Total DOE Funding $1,241 $6,237 $7,477 Technical Scope Conduct a pilot scale "proof-of concept" demonstration of how advanced information- based technologies and distributed energy resources (DER) may increase asset utilization and reliability of the power grid in support of the national agenda. Establish a microgrid demonstration to prove the effectiveness of integrating multiple DER technologies, energy storage, feeder automation system technologies, and outage management

360

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PROGRAM COMMENTS PROGRAM COMMENTS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 529 Program Comments Provided by Reviewers Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Comments Hydrogen Production 1. Was the program area adequately covered? Were important issues and challenges identified? Was progress clearly presented in comparison to the previous year? (Include information presented in the plenary and/or session overview presentations of the program if appropriate.) The Hydrogen Production program area was very well covered-the important issues (including material performance and capital costs for all production pathways) and challenges were clearly described and progress was shown on examples for all research fields (including novel hydrogen production methods)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

AND DELIVERY AND DELIVERY FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 7 2013 - Hydrogen Production and Delivery Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program: This review session evaluated hydrogen production and delivery research and development (R&D) activities in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Office (FCTO) in the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The hydrogen production projects reviewed represented a diverse portfolio of technologies to produce hydrogen from renewable energy sources. Production project sub-categories included water electrolysis, solar-driven thermochemical cycles, photoelectrochemical (PEC) direct water splitting, and biological hydrogen

362

Reactor instrumentation and safety circuit status review and program document  

SciTech Connect

This document has been prepared for internal use by the General Electric Company to serve as a program for evaluating reactor instrumentation and safety circuit equipment needs. It is intended that this document be used as a guide for defining, planning and scheduling engineering effort; budgeting of capital money; and project planning for new instrumentation systems. Effort will be made to periodically evaluate the status of the programs presented and provide updating information accordingly.After a plant has been built and operated for a number of years, it becomes apparent to operating and engineering personnel that certain modifications in controls and monitoring systems would provide both tangible and intangible benefits. Systems which were once thought to be the primary points of control shift in importance as others become recognized. As time passes this shifting spreads the main control focus from the central control desk to various other areas in the control room. Production rate increases cause instrument ranges and scales to be changed so that information on the process can still be obtained from existing equipment. Response times, sensitivity, limits, and time constants which were figured for one level must be used or revised for new levels. Further, it is discovered that the process monitoring points could be relocated or increased in number to provide more and better data on plant operation. New monitoring equipment is developed and installed to fill voids in information so production can continue meeting high standards for safety and process control. Equipment is fitted here and there in an already crowded control room, and some is even relocated to less advantageous positions to make available the necessary panel space. This in brief, is the rather complex status of Hanford Production Reactor instrumentation today.

Deichman, J.L.

1963-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

363

RL-721 Document ID Number: REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of InitiatorEGO signed NRSF to DOE NCO for information only. DOE NCO Page 1 of2 RL-721 Document ID Number: REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM (continued) DOECX-00126, Rev 0 V....

364

RL-721 REV3 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and complete Sitewide Categorical Exclusion Criteria: Page 1 of 2 YES NO NO gJ RL-721 Document ID Number: REV3 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM (continued) DOECX-00057 Sitewide...

365

RL-721 REV4 Document ID Number: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9405630, HCRC2003-200-044, & DOERL-97-56 R1 Additional Attachments: Page 1 of 2 RL-721 Document ID Number: REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM (continued) DOECX-00094 Rev 0 IV....

366

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

D: PROJECTS NOT REVIEWED D: PROJECTS NOT REVIEWED 552 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report List of Projects Not Reviewed Project ID Project Title Principal Investigator Name Organization PD-004 Distributed Bio-Oil Reforming Stefan Czernik National Renewable Energy Laboratory PD-013 Electrolyzer Development for the Copper-Chlorine Thermochemical Cycle Michele Lewis Argonne National Laboratory PD-016 Oil-Free Centrifugal Hydrogen Compression Technology Demonstration Hooshang Heshmat Mohawk Innovative Technology PD-017 Development of a Centrifugal Hydrogen Pipeline Gas Compressor Frank Di Bella Concepts NREC PD-021 Development of High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Tank for Storage and Gaseous Truck Delivery Don Baldwin Hexagon Lincoln PD-027 Solar High-Temperature Water Splitting

367

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS 402 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Safety, Codes and Standards Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Safety, Codes and Standards Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Safety, Codes and Standards Program: The Safety, Codes and Standards program supports research and development (R&D) that provides the critical information needed to define requirements and close gaps in safety, codes, and standards to enable the safe use and handling of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. The program also conducts safety activities focused on promoting safety practices among U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) projects and the development of information resources and best practices. Reviewers recognized that the program continues to provide strong support in the following

368

2010 Solar Program Peer Review Report: An Independent Evaluation of Program Activities for FY2009 and FY2010  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of experts at the DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program's 2010 Program Review meeting, held on May 24?27, 2010, in Washington, D.C.

DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electric Power Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demonstration Project Jodi Startari Ashlawn Energy LLC Briefing Overview * Painesville Municipal Electric Power Plant Project Synopsis * Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Technology * City of Painesville Municipal Electric Plant History * Project Multiple Objectives and Additional Detail * Project Risk Analysis presented at previous Peer Review * Project to date progress * Cost Distribution * Summary/Conclusions * Future Tasks * Questions US Produced Vanadium Redox Flow Battery for Bulk Storage, Peak Shaving * 8 MW Hour redox flow battery (1MW 8 hours) * To be installed at Painesville Municipal Electric Plant (PMEP), a 32 MW coal fired facility * Most efficient PMEP operation is steady state at 26 MW (lowest emissions, lowest operating cost)

370

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION 442 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Market Transformation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Market Transformation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Market Transformation Program: The purpose of the Market Transformation program is to spur market growth for domestically produced hydrogen and fuel cell systems. By supporting increased sales in key early markets, this program helps to identify and overcome non-technical barriers to commercial deployment and to reduce the life cycle costs of fuel cell power by helping to achieve economies of scale. The current focus of the Market Transformation program is to build on past successes in lift truck and emergency backup power applications (part of the U.S. Department of Energy's [DOE's]

371

Peering Information  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peering Information Network Overview Tools Peering Information Interactive Network Map Network Maps Connected Sites Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US)...

372

EPA: Consideration of Cumulative Impacts in EPA Review of NEPA Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Federal Activities (2252A) EPA 315-R-99-002/May 1999 1. INTRODUCTION The combined, incremental effects of human activity, referred to as cumulative impacts, pose a serious threat to the environment. While they may be insignificant by themselves, cumulative impacts accumulate over time, from one or more sources, and can result in the degradation of important resources. Because federal projects cause or are affected by cumulative impacts, this type of impact must be assessed in documents prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The purpose of this guidance is to assist EPA reviewers of NEPA documents in providing accurate, realistic, and consistent

373

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Estimation of Capital and Levelized Cost for Redox Flow Batteries - Vilayanur Viswanathan, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Estimation of Capital and Levelized Estimation of Capital and Levelized Cost for Redox Flow Batteries V. Viswanathan, A. Crawford, L. Thaller 1 , D. Stephenson, S. Kim, W. Wang, G. Coffey, P. Balducci, Z. Gary Yang 2 , Liyu Li 2 , M. Kintner-Meyer, V. Sprenkle 1 Consultant 2 UniEnergy Technology September 28, 2012 USDOE-OE ESS Peer Review Washington, DC Dr. Imre Gyuk - Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability 1 What are we trying to accomplish? PNNL grid analytics team has established ESS cost targets for various applications PNNL cost/performance model estimates cost for redox flow battery systems of various chemistries drives research internally to focus on most important components/parameters/metrics for cost reduction and performance improvement

374

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

A: ATTENDEE LIST A: ATTENDEE LIST FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 511 Attendee List: 2013 Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Last Name First Name Organization Abdel-Baset Tarek Chrysler Group LLC Abraham Judi Conference Management Associates, Inc. Aceves Salvador Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Adams Jesse U.S. Department of Energy, Golden Field Office Adzic Radoslav Brookhaven National Laboratory Afzal Kareem PDC Machines Agar Ertan Drexel University Agrawal Nisha Defense Production Act Committee Ahluwalia Rajesh Argonne National Laboratory Ahmed Aysha National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ahmed Shabbir Argonne National Laboratory Ahn Channing U.S. Department of Energy (IPA from California Institute of Technology) Ahn Sang Hyun National Institute of Standards and Technology

375

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: AEP Ohio gridSMART Demonstration Project - Karen Sloneker, Columbus Southern Power (AEP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting AEP Ohio gridSMART ® Demonstration Project Karen Sloneker AEP Ohio gridSMART Project Director ® December 2008 AEP Ohio gridSMART ® Demonstration Project Objectives * To build an integrated secure smart grid infrastructure. * Attract, educate, enlist and retain consumers using innovative business models that provide tools to reduce costs, consumption and peak demand. * Gather data on technology and smart grid business models to forecast national impact. Life-cycle Funding 2010 - 2013 $73,660,317 Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) * 110,000 AMI meters and associated infrastructure * Consumer Managed Energy Technology (experimental tariffs, consumer programs, web portal; smart appliances, and plug-in electric vehicles) * Innovative Demand Management * Distribution Automation and Reliability

376

2012 SG Peer Review - The Perfect Power Prototype for the Illinois Institute of Technology - Mohmmad Shahidehpour, IIT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Perfect Power Progress Report Perfect Power Progress Report Dr. Mohammad Shahidehpour DOE Peer Review | June 2012 Perfect Power @ IIT Perfect Power @ IIT Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy * $13.6M ($7.6M from DOE, $6M Cost Share) * 5 year project * Located at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) * Involves the entire campus * Partners: IIT, Exelon, S&C Electric, Schweitzer, IPS, Eaton Corporation, ZBB, CIYCOR, Continental Electric, Intelligent Generation This project aligns with the OE mission and the Smart Grid program goals to develop technologies to modernize the electric grid, enhance security and reliability of the energy infrastructure, and facilitate recovery from disruptions to energy supply. Leadership Mohammad Shahidehpour (Principal Investigator) Project Advisor ComEd/Exelon

377

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Sodium Ion Battery for Grid Level Applications - Ted Wiley, Aquion Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Progress Report Progress Report Smart Grid Demonstration Program Ted Wiley, Jay Whitacre Department of Energy Peer Review 26 September, 2012 Confidential Information of Aquion Energy, Inc. 2 Thanks to Our Supporters Confidential Information of Aquion Energy, Inc. 3 About Aquion Energy Founded on the belief that stationary energy storage must be: * Safe: Non-toxic and immune to catastrophic failure events * Reliable: Long lasting and capable of operating in abusive environments * Affordable: Made from abundant, simple materials via a scalable manufacturing process This principle demands a new type of energy storage: Aqueous Hybrid Ion Batteries Designed for stationary, long-duration applications * Utilities-various grid services * Microgrids-telco, mining, commercial/residential solar, military,

378

ESS 2012 Peer Review - PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting - Steve Willard, PNM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mexico (PNM) - Mexico (PNM) - PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting DOE Peer Review Steve Willard, P.E. September 26, 2012 Project Goals - Develop an even more Beneficial Renewable Resource - Transferable Nationwide Renewable Resource Transferable Nationwide *Created a dispatchable, renewables-based peaking resource *Combined PV and storage at a substation targeting 15% peak-load reduction D t ti bi ti th t i lt l iti t lt l l *Demonstrating a combination that can simultaneously mitigate voltage-level fluctuations as well as enable load shifting *Developed power system models (baseline and projected), and cost/benefit economic models eco o c ode s *Generating, collecting, analyzing and sharing resultant data *Enabling distributed solutions that reduce GHG emissions through the

379

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ron Melton, Battelle Memorial Institute  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Overview Overview Ron Melton, Ph.D., Project Director Don Hammerstrom, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Battelle, Pacific Northwest Division Presented at DOE-OE Smart Grid R&D Peer Review June 8, 2012 PNWD-SA-9876 Pacific Northwest Demonstration Project What: * $178M, ARRA-funded, 5-year demonstration * 60,000 metered customers in 5 states Why: * Quantify costs and benefits * Develop communications protocol * Develop standards * Facilitate integration of wind and other renewables Who: Led by Battelle and partners including BPA, 11 utilities, 2 universities, and 5 vendors 2 Project Basics 3 Transactive Control Operational objectives Manage peak demand Facilitate renewable resources Address constrained resources Improve system reliability and efficiency Select economical

380

2012 SG Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Robert Boehm, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

S S t G id P 2012 Smart Grid Program Peer Review Meeting "D ti D d R d ti "Dramatic Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest" Robert F Boehm Robert F. Boehm Center for Energy Research University of Nevada Las Vegas June 8, 2012 "Dramatic Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest" in the Desert Southwest Objective Decrease the peak electrical demand by 65% over code-built houses in a new development of 185 homes. Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY08 - FY13 (now FY15) Technical Scope 1. Build energy conserving residences. 2. Include PV on the residences. FY08 - FY13 (now FY15) $6948k 3. Develop a demand control system that gives the customer options and that is enhanced by an artificial intelligence supplemental system. Instantaneous December 2008 power pricing information will be available

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects The Renaissance Hotel Washington, D.C. September 2012 Presented by Dan Borneo SAND Document 5312608 SAND2012-7453 C...

382

Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1045_Peer Reviews Panel_Lehman Workshop...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

w-headings More Documents & Publications Microsoft PowerPoint - 09 Lehman final 1003 SC PM Workshop Microsoft PowerPoint - 15.1615Cost Estimating Panel Microsoft PowerPoint -...

383

Engineering Basis Document Review Supporting the Double Shell Tank (DST) System Specification Development  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Double-Shell Tank (DST) System is required to transition from its current storage mission to a storage and retrieval mission supporting the River Protection Project Phase 1 privatization, defined in HNF-SD-WM-MAR-008, Tank Waste Remediation System Mission Analysis Report. Requirements for the DST subsystems are being developed using the top-down systems engineering process outlined in HNF-SD-WM-SEMP-002, Tank Waste Remediation System Systems Engineering Management Plan. This top-down process considers existing designs to the extent that these designs impose unavoidable constraints on the Phase 1 mission. Existing engineering-basis documents were screened, and the unavoidable constraints were identified. The constraints identified herein will be added to the DST System specification (HNF-SD-WM-TRD-007, System Specification for the Double-Shell Tank System). While the letter revisions of the DST System specification were constructed with a less rigorous review of the existing engineering-basis documents, the Revision 0 release of the specification must incorporate the results of the review documented herein. The purpose of this document is to describe the screening process and criteria used to determine which constraints are unavoidable and to document the screening results.

LEONARD, M.W.

2000-03-14T23:59:59.000Z

384

Scientometric analysis of publications in the area of nanoenergy based on the materials of the peer-reviewed journal of VINITI RAS Physics of Nanoobjects and Nanotechnology  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Based on the analysis of a range of key publications in the area of nanoenergy, which, among other journals, were reflected in the Physics of Nanoobjects and Nanotechnology issue of the peer-reviewed journal that was published by the All-Russia ... Keywords: nanoenergy, nanomaterials, nanoobjects, nanophysics, scientometrics, solar cells

N. M. Builova; A. I. Osipov

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

A document review to characterize Atomic International SNAP fuels shipped to INEL 1966--1973  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides the results of a document search and review study to obtain information on the spent fuels for the following six Nuclear Auxiliary Power (SNAP) reactor cores now stored at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL): SNAP-2 Experimental Reactor, SNAP-2 Development Reactor, SNAP-10A Ground Test Reactor, SNAP-8 Experimental Reactor, SNAP-8 Development Reactor, and Shield Test Reactor. The report also covers documentation on SNAP fuel materials from four in-pile materials tests: NAA-82-1, NAA-115-2, NAA-117-1, and NAA-121. Pieces of these fuel materials are also stored at INEL as part of the SNAP fuel shipments.

Wahnschaffe, S.D.; Lords, R.E. [eds.; Kneff, D.W.; Nagel, W.E.; Pearlman, H.; Schaubert, V.J.

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

386

Program on Technology Innovation: Cooling Water Review of the Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The EPRI Utility Requirements Document (URD) was developed and last revised in 1999 to provide a list of requirements for the design and construction of new nuclear power plants. The objective of this project was to review URD Vol. III. This volume covers passive advanced light water reactors (ALWRs) for plant design requirements with respect to operations and maintenance (O&M) practices of the plant's cooling water systems (not including the circulating water system used for condenser cooling). The revi...

2007-07-26T23:59:59.000Z

387

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Solid State Li Metal Batteries for Grid...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Review 2012 Mohit Singh, VP R&D and Engineering Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program from the Department of Energy through the National Energy Technology...

388

Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses Plan. Draft for Peer Review: Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) Project staff are developing mathematical models to be used to estimate the radiation dose that individuals may have received as a result of emissions since 1944 from the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. An uncertainty and sensitivity analyses plan is essential to understand and interpret the predictions from these mathematical models. This is especially true in the case of the HEDR models where the values of many parameters are unknown. This plan gives a thorough documentation of the uncertainty and hierarchical sensitivity analysis methods recommended for use on all HEDR mathematical models. The documentation includes both technical definitions and examples. In addition, an extensive demonstration of the uncertainty and sensitivity analysis process is provided using actual results from the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Integrated Codes (HEDRIC). This demonstration shows how the approaches used in the recommended plan can be adapted for all dose predictions in the HEDR Project.

Simpson, J.C.; Ramsdell, J.V. Jr.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Under consideration for publication in Knowledge and Information Systems Expertise-based Peer Selection in Peer-to-Peer  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

is a problem for full-text searching. To be specific, in a document sharing case, one could roughly do two of this approach in the domain of full-text searches, is what information a peer has to tell to another peer so ontology. We evaluate the model in a bibliographic scenario, where peers share bibliographic descriptions

van Harmelen, Frank

390

2006 Peered Reviewed Archival Publications Adjeroh, D.A., Y. Zhang*  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and hybrid electric vehicles. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 56: 898-910. (MAE) Upadhyay properties of rubber-toughened post- industrial glass-fiber reinforced PA 66. Int. Polym. Processing. 21: 189 emissions from heavy-duty diesel vehicles: review and recent data. Journal of Air and Waste Management

Mohaghegh, Shahab

391

Final External Peer Review Report for Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: This reviewer was chosen primarily for his expertise in civil engineering (dredging, wetlands and coastal experience with flood management, wetland restoration, restoration design, marsh restoration, and coastal relative SLR in coastal Louisiana, and the EPA projections of accelerated SLR in the future, will have

US Army Corps of Engineers

392

ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Battery Component Development - Wei Wang, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Battery Component Development Wei Wang, Qingtao Luo, Xiaoliang Wei, Bin Li, Zimin Nie, Baowei Chen, Yuyan Shao, Vijayakumar Murugesan, Amy Chen, Gordon, Xia, Liyu Li, Gary Z. Yang, Vincent Sprenkle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Boulevard P. O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352, USA DOE Stationary Energy Storage Program Review, Washington, DC Sept. 26-28, 2012 Dr. Imre Gyuk 1 2 Review of previous work 2.5M, ~30Wh/L, -5~50 o C Mixed-acid VRB Double Energy Density Extend temperature window Charge Discharge Charge Discharge Charge Discharge Catholyte: VO 2+ + Cl - + H 2 O - e VO 2 Cl + 2H + ε co =1.0 V Anolyte: V 3+ + e V 2+ ε ao =-0.25 Overall: VO 2+ + Cl

393

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LADWP Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Project - Mukhlesur Bhuiyan, City of Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting San Diego, CA Los Angeles Department of Water and Power - Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Program Mukhles Bhuiyan Program Director June 8, 2012 December 2008 Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Program Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY10/11 - FY15/16 $60,280K Match Grant Technical Scope *Integrate Electric Vehicles into the LADWP grid *Demonstrate integrated Demand Response operation and technology. *Develop a comprehensive portfolio of Customer Behavior studies *Demonstrate next generation of Cyber Security *Using test bed sites to deploy and demonstrate an integrated communication, demand response, and electric vehicle infrastructure, protected by the next generation cyber security. *All this will be done in conjunction with consumer behavior studies identifying methods to

394

Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis and Safety Design Basis Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1104-2009 May 2009 Superseding DOE-STD-1104-96 DOE STANDARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS AND SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1104-2009 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards web page at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1104-2009 iii CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. v INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................

395

Habitat Evaluation: Guidance for the Review of Environmental Impact Assessment Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HABITAT EVALUATION: HABITAT EVALUATION: GUIDANCE FOR THE REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTS EPA Contract No. 68-C0-0070 work Assignments B-21, 1-12 January 1993 Submitted to: Jim Serfis U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Federal Activities 401 M Street, SW Washington, DC 20460 Submitted by: Mark Southerland Dynamac Corporation The Dynamac Building 2275 Research Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ... ...... .... ... ................................................. 1 Habitat Conservation .......................................... 2 Habitat Evaluation Methodology ................................... 2 Habitats of Concern ........................................... 3 Definition of Habitat ..................................... 4

396

System specification/system design document comment review: Plutonium Stabilization and Packaging System. Notes of conference  

SciTech Connect

A meeting was held between DOE personnel and the BNFL team to review the proposed resolutions to DOE comments on the initial issue of the system specification and system design document for the Plutonium Stabilization and Packaging System. The objectives of this project are to design, fabricate, install, and start up a glovebox system for the safe repackaging of plutonium oxide and metal, with a requirement of a 50-year storage period. The areas discussed at the meeting were: nitrogen in can; moisture instrumentation; glovebox atmosphere; can marking-bar coding; weld quality; NFPA-101 references; inner can swabbing; ultimate storage environment; throughput; convenience can screw-top design; furnace/trays; authorization basis; compactor safety; schedule for DOE review actions; fire protection; criticality safety; applicable standards; approach to MC and A; homogeneous oxide; resistance welder power; and tray overfill. Revised resolutions were drafted and are presented.

NONE

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

397

2012 CERTS LAAR Program Peer Review - Load as a Regulation Resource, Phase 2 - Sila Kiliccote, LBNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group Load as a Regulation Resource Sila Kiliccote, Jason MacDonald, Livio Fenga and Dave Watson Demand Response Research Center Grid Integration Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory http://drrc.lbl.gov CERTS review September 20, 2012 Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group Outline  Phase 1 summary - Overview of OpenADR - Major Phase 1 accomplishments  Project objectives  Tasks and major technical accomplishments completed  Deliverables and schedule  Risk Factors  Follow-on Work Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group What is OpenADR and how does it work? Signaling- continuous, 2-way, secure messaging system for dynamic prices, emergency and

398

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications Daiwon Choi, Vilayanur V. Viswanathan, Wei Wang, Vincent L. Sprenkle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Blvd., P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352, USA DOE Energy Storage Program Review, Washington, DC Sept. 26-28, 2012 Acknowledgment: Dr. Imre Gyuk - Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability  Investigate the Li-ion battery for stationary energy storage unit in ~kWh level.  Fabrication and optimization of LiFePO 4 / Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 18650 cell.  Li-ion battery energy storage with effective thermal management.  Improve rate and cycle life of Li-ion battery.  Screen possible new cathode/anode electrode materials and its combinations

399

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Essence of Structure Preserving Network Reductions - Dan Tylavsky  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tylavsky & Di Shi Tylavsky & Di Shi Arizona State University Hyungseon Oh University of Buffalo William Schulze, Ray Zimmerman, Dick Shuler, John Taber, Jubo Yan, Charles Marquet Cornell University Dan Shawhan Rensselaer Polytechnic University Overview * Motivation-Develop network Eq's for US for generator investment studies * Review (Modified) Ward-type network equivalent - Apply to EI, ERCOT & WECC - Model accuracy evaluation * Effect of dc model reduction * Effect of ac v. dc approximation * Base case, change cases & OPF * Bus Aggregation--A different approach for reduction * Clustering * Equivalent branch reactances * Accuracy * Conclusions Study Objective * Develop a backbone equivalent network model of the entire United States as a tool (to be made public domain) for the future

400

ESS 2012 Peer Review - ARPA-E Storage Overview - Mark Johnson, DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Storage Overview Storage Overview September 26, 2012 DOE Energy Storage Review Mark Johnson Advanced Research Projects Agency * Energy 2006 Rising Above the Gathering Storm (National Academies) 2007 America COMPETES Act ARPA-E Launched at National Academies: April 27, 2009 First Funding Announcement: May 2, 2009 Innovation based on science and engineering will be primary driver of our future prosperity & security 2009 ARRA ($400M appropriated) A Brief History of of ARPA-E FY11 Budget CR ($180M appropriated) FY12 Budget ($275M appropriated) 2 Advanced Research Projects Agency * Energy Venture Capital and Small Businesses Private Equity/Capital & Large Corporations Government Procurement Office of Science Applied Energy Offices Technology Maturity

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Multi-period Multi-period Stochastic Optimization with Evolving Information Ray Zimmerman, Carlos Murillo-Sánchez, C. Lindsay Anderson, Bob Thomas, Amandeep Gupta, Daniel Muñoz-Álvarez CERTS Review, Cornell University August 7-8, 2012 Outline * Project Overview - progress on underlying tools - current focus * Design of Receding Horizon Framework * Uncertainty in Receding Horizon Input Data (i.e. "feeding the monster") 2 SuperOPF Map 3 MATPOWER SuperOPF Planning Tool 1 st gen SuperOPF AC and DC versions 3 rd gen SuperOPF 2 nd gen SuperOPF AC and DC versions extensible OPF architecture high performance solvers single-period explicit contingencies stochastic cost endogenous reserves 2-stage simulation structure environmental costs

402

2012 CERTS LAAR Program Peer Review - Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation - Nasr Alkadi, ORNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nasr Alkadi, Ph.D. Nasr Alkadi, Ph.D. Michael Starke, PhD Oak Ridge National Laboratory CERTS Internal Program Review FY12 DOE-CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation September 20, 2012 2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Project objective: Scoping of Regulation Reserves in Industrial Sector 2 Alcoa's Smelting Process is a significant regulation asset at Warrick, IN. * Alcoa has demonstrated Regulation Band in the 50 MW range (25/25) * Represents ~10% of BL of 500 MW) 1. Develop an estimate of the amount of regulation that could reasonably be expected from industrial loads based on publicly available information. 2. Analyze the potential impact of regulation on the manufacturing process.

403

Peer review presentation on systems performance modeling and solar advisor support.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Accurate Performance Models are Critical to Project Development and Technology Evaluation - Accuracy and Uncertainty of Commonly-Used Models Unknown and Models Disagree. A Model Evaluation Process Has Been Developed with Industry, and High-Quality Weather and System Performance Data Sets Have Been Collected: (1) Evaluation is Underway using Residual Analysis of Hourly and Sub-Hourly Data for Clear and Diffuse Climates to Evaluate and Improve Models; and (2) Initial Results Have Been or Will Soon Be Presented at Key Conferences. Evaluation of Widely-Used Module, Inverter, and Irradiance Models, Including Those in SAM, PVWatts, and PVSyst, Will Be Completed This Year. Stochastic Modeling Has Been Performed to Support Reliability Task and Will Add Value to Parametric Analysis. An Industry Workshop will be Held This Fall To Review Results, Set Priorities. Support and Analysis has been Provided for TPP's, SETP, and PV Community. Goals for Future Work Include: (1) Improving Understanding of and Validating System Derate Factors; and (2) Developing a Dynamic Electrical Model of Arrays with Shaded or Mismatched Modules to Support Transient Analysis of Large Fields.

Cameron, Christopher P.

2010-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Total energy cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: an energy and environmental analysis. Volume 4: peer review comments on technical report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report compares the energy use, oil use and emissions of electric vehicles (EVs) with those of conventional, gasoline-powered vehicles (CVs) over the total life cycle of the vehicles. The various stages included in the vehicles` life cycles include vehicle manufacture, fuel production, and vehicle operation. Disposal is not included. An inventory of the air emissions associated with each stage of the life cycle is estimated. Water pollutants and solid wastes are reported for individual processes, but no comprehensive inventory is developed. Volume IV includes copies of all the external peer review comments on the report distributed for review in July 1997.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

Safety System Oversight Program Assessment Criteria and Review Approach Document (CRAD), Revision 0  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of 7 of 7 Safety System Oversight (SSO) Program Implementation Assessment Criteria and Review Approach Documents (CRADs) Revision 0 PROGRAM (PGM) OBJECTIVE PGM.1 An effective SSO Program is established by the Field Element Manager to apply engineering expertise to maintain safety system configuration and to assess system condition and effectiveness of safety management program implementation. Criteria PGM.1.1 The SSO Qualification Program is part of the Technical Qualification Program (DOE M 426.1-1A, Chapter III, Section 1, 2.b (1)). PGM.1.2 The SSO Program establishes appropriate training, qualification, and performance requirements for SSO personnel and the supervisors are held accountable for achieving them (DOE M 426.1-1A, Chapter III, Section 1, 2.b

406

CEDS 2010 Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Philip A Craig Jr Philip A Craig Jr Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Real-Time Security State Visualization Real-Time Security State Visualization  Outcomes: Near real-time situational awareness utilizing a diverse set of data feeds with a flexible visualization implementation.  Roadmap Challenge: Fusing perimeter security, network traffic analysis, signature-based intrusion detection systems, routable and serial traffic analysis.  Major Successes: Produced an integrated view of real-time network and physical security events at a power substation  Schedule: Deliver 1 st POC, 2 nd POC Fall 2010  Level of Effort: $325K  Funds Remaining: $75K  Performers: PNNL  Partners: ANL, STI, OSIsoft High Level Illustration of Functions/Components Real-Time Security State Visualization

407

Peer Reviewed Archival Publications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

size during the blending of relatively-inelastic polymer melts. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 23: 135. Characteristics and carbonization behaviors of coal extracts. Fuel Processing Technology 79: 207-215. Stiller, A

Mohaghegh, Shahab

408

CEDS 2010 Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Produced an integrated view of real-time network and physical security events at a power substation Schedule: Deliver 1 st POC, 2 nd POC Fall 2010 Level of Effort:...

409

FEMP Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FEMP's mission and goals * Relevance to technical and market challenges * Management In addition, the panel assessed FEMP's congruence with the mission and goals of the...

410

For Peer Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Here ?E denotes the total time derivative of the total mechanical energy, ..... The distance function dC, which measures the distance to a closed set C, is given by:.

411

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

motor controller inverter system. (In work) * 2008 Task 2 * Continue integration of direct cooled HTS system with the rotor assembly (95% of hardware is complete, last upgrades...

412

Peer Reviewed Archival Publications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. (Roger) Chen Chen, H.L. and Y. He* . 2001. Analysis of an acoustic surface waveguide for AE monitoring, and A.L. Miller. 2001. SO2 removal by leaching coal pyrite. Energy and Fuels 15: 470-476. Dady B. Dadyburjor Zhu+ , J.S., L.P. Norcio, E.L. Kugler, D.B. Dadyburjor, J.L. Yang+ , Z.Y. Liu+ , and B. Zhong

Mohaghegh, Shahab

413

An external peer review of the U.S. Department of Energy`s assessment of ``damages and benefits of the fuel cycles: Estimation methods, impacts, and values``. Final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The need for better assessments of the ``external`` benefits and costs of environmental effects of various fuel cycles was identified during the development of the National Energy Strategy. The growing importance of this issue was emphasized by US Department of Energy (DOE) management because over half of the states were already pursuing some form of social costing in electricity regulation and a well-established technical basis for such decisions was lacking. This issue was identified as a major area of controversy--both scientifically and politically--in developing energy policies at the state and national level. In 1989, the DOE`s Office of Domestic and International Energy Policy commissioned a study of the external environmental damages and benefits of the major fuel cycles involved in electric power generation. Over the next 3-year period, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Resources for the Future conducted the study and produced a series of documents (fuel cycle documents) evaluating the costs of environmental damages of the coal, oil, natural gas, biomass, hydroelectric, and nuclear fuel cycles, as well as the Background Document on methodological issues. These documents described work that took almost 3 years and $2.5 million to complete and whose implications could be far reaching. In 1992, the Secretary of Energy sought advice on the overall concepts underlying the studies and the means employed to estimate environmental externalities. He asked the Secretary of Energy`s Advisory Board to undertake a peer review of the fuel cycle studies and encouraged the Board to turn to outside expertise, as needed.

Not Available

1993-08-09T23:59:59.000Z

414

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2005 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2005 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

415

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2006 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2006 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

416

COMMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ON JUNE 2003 FOURTH EXTERNAL REVIEW DRAFT CRITERIA DOCUMENT FOR PARTICULATE MATTER  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

COMMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/OFFICE OF FOSSIL COMMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/OFFICE OF FOSSIL ENERGY STAFF ON JUNE 2003 FOURTH EXTERNAL REVIEW DRAFT CRITERIA DOCUMENT FOR PARTICULATE MATTER Summary and Conclusions The Fourth External Review Draft Criteria Document for Particulate Matter (henceforth, the CD) is a very comprehensive review of both epidemiological and toxicological research into the health effects of particulate matter (PM) in ambient air. DOE/Office of Fossil Energy offers the following comments on it. OMB's "Principles and Procedures" memorandum to agencies states: "OIRA's [OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs] review also evaluates, on occasion in consultation with the Office of Science and Technology Policy, whether the agency has, in assessing exposure to a risk or an environmental

417

Assessment of Financial Savings from Peer Reviews of In-Progress Projects: A Case Study from the Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Financial Savings Financial Savings From Peer Reviews of In-Progress Projects: A Case Study from the Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program Prepared By: Yaw O. Agyeman, TMS, Inc. with Jeff Dowd, DOE Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Prepared for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy October 2008 Acknowledgments: Special thanks go to the following people who provided inputs to the study or review comments on an earlier draft of this paper. * EERE Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program - JoAnn Milliken, Nancy Garland, Sunita Satyapal, Antonio Ruiz, Roxanne Garland, and John Garbak. * Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis - Darrell Beschen and Randy Steer. * National Renewable Energy Laboratory - Neil Snyder and Bill Babiuch.

418

EVALUATION OF THE FINAL REPORT: WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EVALUATION OF THE FINAL REPORT: WASTE EVALUATION OF THE FINAL REPORT: WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL B00000000-01717-5700-00005 REV 00 August 2002 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. QA: QA B00000000-01717-5700-00005 REV 00 August 2002 Evaluation of the Final Report: Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Panel Prepared by: Jack N. Bailey, Jack D. Cloud, Thomas E. Rodgers, and Tammy S.E. Summers Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office P.O. Box 364629 North Las Vegas, Nevada 89036-8629 Prepared by: Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC 1180 Town Center Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Under Contract Number DE-AC28-01RW12101 Disclaimer Signature Page Change History Acknowledgments

419

This document has undergone formal review and approval and been reviewed by a Derivative Classifier, and its contents have been deemed unclassified, unlimited release.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

include dialog (such as a pretask plan or tailgate meeting), document (such as checklist or permit Expectations Plan Work Review of SNL Jobsite Hazard Evaluation Checklist Understand existing conditions/restrictions identified on the hazard evaluation checklist. Contractor, Subcontractors, and workers are aware

420

Appendix A: Literature Review The objective of this appendix is to document the salient findings of the literature review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

review of public-private partnerships (PPP) before highlighting the findings of the literature review as it pertains to U.S. and international toll roads, respectively. Public-Private Partnerships Public-Private

Texas at Austin, University of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

WP_Peer_Rev_Spec_Top_Rpts.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Package Materials Performance Peer Review Package Materials Performance Peer Review A Compilation of Special Topic Reports Compiled and Edited by Frank M.G. Wong and Joe H. Payer May 31, 2002 Special Topic Reports prepared for the Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review. The Final Report of the Peer Review was submitted to U.S. Department of Energy and Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC on February 28, 2002. ii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Special Topic Reports prepared for the Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review. The Final Report of the Peer Review was submitted to U.S. Department of Energy and Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC on February 28, 2002. iii Table of Contents Introduction Design And Fabrication Factors 1. Fabrication Processes and Metallurgy: Peer Review Sub-Panel Meeting F. Wong

422

Independent peer review panel report on the integrated nonthermal treatment systems study and the comparison of integrated thermal and integrated nonthermal treatment systems for mixed low level waste  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) Office of Science and Technology (OST) has conducted studies of integrated thermal treatment systems and integrated nonthermal treatment systems (INTS) for treating contact handled, alpha and non-alpha mixed low level radioactive waste (MLLW). The MLLW in the DOE complex consists of a wide variety of organic and inorganic solids and liquids contaminated with radioactive substances. Treatment systems are needed to destroy organic material and stabilize residues prior to land disposal. In May 1996 the Deputy Assistant Secretary for OST appointed an Independent Peer Review Panel to: (1) review and comment on the INTS Study; (2) make recommendations on the most promising thermal and nonthermal treatment systems; (3) make recommendations on research and development necessary to prove the performance of nonthermal and thermal technologies; and (4) review and comment on the preliminary draft of the ITTS/INTS Comparison Report. This report presents the primary conclusions and recommendations based on the review of the INTS study and the comparison report. System selection, overviews, comparisons, cost estimations and sensitivity analyses, and recommended R and D engineering needs are then described and discussed.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2009 Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

424

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: KCP&L Green Impact Zone Smart Grid Demonstration - Edward Hedges, Kansas City Power & Light  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting KCP&L Green Impact Zone SmartGrid Demonstration Project Edward T. Hedges, P.E. Manager SmartGrid Technology Planning Kansas City Power & Light Company June 8, 2012 December 2008 KCP&L Green Impact Zone SmartGrid Demonstration Project Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) 2010 - 2014 $23,940,112 Technical Scope First, Create a complete, end-to-end Smart Grid Second, Introduce new technologies, applications, protocols, communications and business models Third, Incorporates a best-in-class approach to technology integration through use of Smart Grid interoperability standards Finally, Support a targeted urban revitalization effort in Kansas City's Green Impact Zone 2 - SmartSubstation - SmartDistribution - SmartGeneration - SmartDR/DER

425

Radioactive waste isolation in salt: Peer review of the Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation's draft report on an issues hierarchy and data needs for site characterization  

SciTech Connect

At the request of the Salt Repository Project (SRPO), Argonne National Laboratory conducted an independent peer review of a report by the Battelle Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation entitled ''Salt Repository Project Issues Hierarchy and Data Needs for Site Characterization (Draft).'' This report provided a logical structure for evaluating the outstanding questions (issues) related to selection and licensing of a site as a high-level waste repository. It also provided a first estimate of the information and data necessary to answer or resolve those questions. As such, this report is the first step in developing a strategy for site characterization. Microfiche copies of ''Draft Issues Hierarchy, Resolution Strategy, and Information Needs for Site Characterization and Environmental/Socioeconomic Evaluation - July, 1986'' and ''Issues Hierarchy and Data Needs for Site Characterization - February, 1985'' are included in the back pocket of this report.

Harrison, W.; Fenster, D.F.; Ditmars, J.D.; Paddock, R.A.; Rote, D.M.; Hambley, D.F.; Seitz, M.G.; Hull, A.B.

1986-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

Overview Documents: Document 0703019  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sites Feedback Overview Documents Page 19 Next - - - > < - Previous U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Minutes of Commissioners' Executive Session 74 - 29 May 13, 1974 Document...

427

Microsoft Word - TRPR 2010 Public Document FINAL.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review i October 2010 Table of Contents Transmission Reliability Program Overview .................................................................................. 1 Long-Term Goal and Milestones .......................................................................................................... 2 Key Technical Challenges and Needs ................................................................................................... 2 Implementation Strategy ....................................................................................................................... 4 The Peer Review ............................................................................................................................. 4

428

Documentation and review of Eastern gas shales technology. Annual report, April 1, 1985-February 28, 1986  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The report provides coverage on a project (1) to provide technology-transfer support for the Eastern Gas Shales Project Area, promoting the awareness and application of the program products through periodic publication of Eastern Devonian Gas Shales Technology Review and (2) to quantify impacts of technology improvements on shale gas cost-supply relationships, in order to aid in guiding the thrust of GRI's research program.

Skrinak, V.M.

1986-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

RL-721 Document ID Number: REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ID Number: ID Number: REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00125, Rev 0 I. Project Title: MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Actions to Conserve Energy or Water under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B5.1 II. Project Description and location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform actions to conserve energy or

430

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Solid State Li Metal Batteries for Grid-Scale Energy Storage - Mohit Singh, Seeo  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Review 2012 Annual Review 2012 Mohit Singh, VP R&D and Engineering Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program from the Department of Energy through the National Energy Technology Laboratory Copyright ©2012 Seeo Inc. All rights reserved Conventional Li Ion Seeo Battery Li Foil Anode Dry Solid Separator Dry Polymer Cathode Composite Al Current Collector Cu Current Collector Porous Graphite Anode Composite Porous Separator Porous Cathode Composite Al Current Collector Element Li Ion Seeo Seeo Benefits Electrolyte Liquid Solid Safety: Non-reactive and non-flammable Energy: Superior specific energy (Wh/kg) Reliability: High temp stability, minimal fade Anode Porous Solid Cathode Porous Solid Seeo's solid polymer battery

431

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-OE FY12 Electrical DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects The Renaissance Hotel Washington, D.C. September 2012 Presented by Dan Borneo SAND Document 5312608 SAND2012-7453 C Acknowledgements I would like to thank the DOE's Office of Electricity and Dr. Imre Gyuk, Program Manager of the Electrical Energy Storage Program, for their support and funding of the Energy Storage Demonstration Projects. 2 EES Emerging Technology Demonstrations Presentation Outline  Project Overview  Problem Statement  Approach  Current Status  Path Forward - Next Steps  Geographical Representation of Projects  Summary Chart of Projects  Brief Descriptions of Individual Projects  Concluding Remarks 3 EES Demonstrations Project Overview  Problem Statement

432

ORISE: Implementing Improvements to Benefit the Scientific Peer...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Application The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) sets the standard for automated scientific peer reviews by continuously implementing process...

433

RL-721 Document ID Number: REV2 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00035  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REV2 REV2 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00035 I. Project Title: LIMITED FIREBREAK MAINTENANCE ON THE HANFORD SITE DURING CALENDAR YEAR 2011 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, etc.): The u.s. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to perform limited firebreak maintenance in selected areas of the Hanford Site during calendar year 2011 using prescribed burning, dis king, and/or blading. Prescribed burning will be conducted by the Hanford Fire Department and only in previously disturbed areas. Similarly, dis king and blading will be conducted by the Hanford Mission Support Contractor Road Maintenance organization and only

434

RL-721 Document ID Number: REV3 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00060  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REV3 REV3 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00060 I. Project Title: Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For CY 2012 Scheduled To Take Place Under CX B1.23, "Demolition and Disposal of Buildings" II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will demolish and dispose of buildings on & near the Hanford Site during Calendar Year 2012. WRPS will perform all activities in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & B to Subpart D, & CX B1.23. WRPS' facilities include all those identified in

435

ACE Merit Review Report FY2004  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Merit Review and Peer Evaluation of FY 2004 DOE Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL May 18-20, 2004 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Program December 2004 Bringing you a prosperous future where energy is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 13, 2004 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2004 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 18-20, 2004 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were

436

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - A Business Model for Retail Aggregation of Responsive Load - Shmuel Oren  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Load Load Control Aggregation Shmuel S. Oren UC Berkeley, California CERTS REVIEW Cornell University, Ithaca NY August 7-8, 2012 PSERC 2 A Smart Grid Vision "Homeostatic Utility Control is an overall concept which tries to maintain an internal equilibrium between supply and demand. Equilibrating forces are obtained over longer time scales (5 minutes and up) by economic principles through an Energy Marketplace using time-varying spot prices. " F.C. Schweppe et al. "HOMEOSTATIC UTILITY CONTROL," IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-99, No. 3, May/June 1980 Offered to commercial and industrial customers with load > 500KW

437

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Hydrogen-Bromine Flow Batteries for Grid-Scale Energy Storage - Vincent Battaglia, LBNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

H H 2 /Br 2 Flow Battery for Grid-Scale Energy Storage Venkat Srinivasan, Adam Weber, & Vince Battaglia Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory * DOE ESS Review * Washington, DC * September 26, 2012 vsbattaglia@lbl.gov Purpose Develop a low-cost, energy-storage system with high power density at 80% efficiency Use H 2 and Br 2 in a flow battery Future Plans Modeling Funding from ARPA-E GRIDS, USDOE LBNL: Kyu Taek Cho (Cell studies); Paul Ridgway (Catalysis studies); Sophia Haussener (Transport modeling) Bosch: Paul Albertus (Cost Modeling); Roel Sanchez-Carrera and Boris Kozinsky (Catalyst theory)

438

Approximate query answering in unstructured peer-to-peer databases.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??Peer-to-peer networks are considered the new generation of distributed databases, termed peer-to-peer databases. With very large size, open architecture, and extreme dynamism and autonomy, approximate (more)

Banaei-Kashani, Farnoush

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Understanding the Effects of Data Quality on Market Functions - Lang Tong  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Data Data Quality and its Effects on Market Functions Lang Tong, Robert J. Thomas, Liyan Jia, and Jinsub Kim School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Cornell University, Ithaca, New York CERTS Review, August 8, 2012 Tong, Thomas, Jia, Kim (Cornell University) Data Quality on Market Functions 8/8/2012 1 / 33 Project Overview Objectives: The main objective of this research is to investigate how data quality affects market functions of current and future grids: develop models and measures of data quality; quantify risks of bad and malicious data; develop techniques to isolate and mitigate effects of bad and malicious data. Tong, Thomas, Jia, Kim (Cornell University) Data Quality on Market Functions 8/8/2012 2 / 33 Project Overview Objectives: The main objective of this research is to investigate how data quality affects market functions of current and future grids: develop models

440

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Evaluating the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand - Tim Mount  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluating the Effects of Managing Evaluating the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand and Distributed Energy Resources Locally on System Performance and Costs Tim Mount and Ray Zimmerman Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Alejandro Dominguez-Garcia Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign CERTS Review, Cornell, August 7-8, 2012 An NSF I/UCRC Collaborative Research on the Smart Grid PSERC Researchers at Cornell Engineers Economists Lindsay Anderson Wooyoung Jeon* Hsiao-Dong Chiang Alberto Lamadrid* Andrew Hunter Jung Youn Mo* Bob Thomas Surin Maneevitjit* Lang Tong Tim Mount Max Zhang Dick Schuler Ray Zimmerman Bill Schulze + Hao Lu* Judy Cardell, Smith College +

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Overview Documents: Document 0706963  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Related Sites Feedback Overview Documents Page 143 Next - - - > < - Previous Atomic Energy Commission Plan for Expansion of Research in Biology and Medicine. Note by the...

442

ORISE: Inter-rater Reliability brings Standardization to Scientific Peer  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standardization of Scientific Peer Reviews Standardization of Scientific Peer Reviews IRR: A New Initiative Aims to Bring Standardization to ORISE Scientific Peer Reviews In some peer reviews, clear instructions on the basis for rating proposals may not be given to reviewers. As a result, the reviewers' final ratings can leave much room for interpretation thanks to varying degrees of reviewer knowledge and experience... all of which contribute to the final rating number. For instance, the rating scale for a particular review is 1 to 5 (with 1 being the highest). One reviewer rates the proposal a 2, and a second reviewer rates the same proposal a 4 but notes "this is the best proposal" he's ever seen. If the proposal was the best ever, why didn't he rate the proposal a 1? And, was the range in their scores due

443

NRC review of Electric Power Research Institute`s advanced light water reactor utility requirements document. Passive plant designs, chapter 1, project number 669  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is preparing a compendium of technical requirements, referred to as the {open_quotes}Advanced Light Water Reactor [ALWR] Utility Requirements Document{close_quotes}, that is acceptable to the design of an ALWR power plant. When completed, this document is intended to be a comprehensive statement of utility requirements for the design, construction, and performance of an ALWR power plant for the 1990s and beyond. The Requirements Document consists of three volumes. Volume 1, {open_quotes}ALWR Policy and Summary of Top-Tier Requirements{close_quotes}, is a management-level synopsis of the Requirements Document, including the design objectives and philosophy, the overall physical configuration and features of a future nuclear plant design, and the steps necessary to take the proposed ALWR design criteria beyond the conceptual design state to a completed, functioning power plant. Volume II consists of 13 chapters and contains utility design requirements for an evolutionary nuclear power plant [approximately 1350 megawatts-electric (MWe)]. Volume III contains utility design requirements for nuclear plants for which passive features will be used in their designs (approximately 600 MWe). In April 1992, the staff of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, issued Volume 1 and Volume 2 (Parts 1 and 2) of its safety evaluation report (SER) to document the results of its review of Volumes 1 and 2 of the Requirements Document. Volume 1, {open_quotes}NRC Review of Electric Power Research Institute`s Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document - Program Summary{close_quotes}, provided a discussion of the overall purpose and scope of the Requirements Document, the background of the staff`s review, the review approach used by the staff, and a summary of the policy and technical issues raised by the staff during its review.

Not Available

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

NRC review of Electric Power Research Institute`s advanced light water reactor utility requirements document. Passive plant designs, chapters 2-13, project number 669  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is preparing a compendium of technical requirements, referred to as the {open_quotes}Advanced Light Water Reactor [ALWR] Utility Requirements Document{close_quotes}, that is acceptable to the design of an ALWR power plant. When completed, this document is intended to be a comprehensive statement of utility requirements for the design, construction, and performance of an ALWR power plant for the 1990s and beyond. The Requirements Document consists of three volumes. Volume I, {open_quotes}ALWR Policy and Summary of Top-Tier Requirements{close_quotes}, is a management-level synopsis of the Requirements Document, including the design objectives and philosophy, the overall physical configuration and features of a future nuclear plant design, and the steps necessary to take the proposed ALWR design criteria beyond the conceptual design state to a completed, functioning power plant. Volume II consists of 13 chapters and contains utility design requirements for an evolutionary nuclear power plant [approximately 1350 megawatts-electric (MWe)]. Volume III contains utility design requirements for nuclear plants for which passive features will be used in their designs (approximately 600 MWe). In April 1992, the staff of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, issued Volume 1 and Volume 2 (Parts 1 and 2) of its safety evaluation report (SER) to document the results of its review of Volumes 1 and 2 of the Requirements Document. Volume 1, {open_quotes}NRC Review of Electric Power Research Institute`s Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document - Program Summary{close_quotes}, provided a discussion of the overall purpose and scope of the Requirements Document, the background of the staff`s review, the review approach used by the staff, and a summary of the policy and technical issues raised by the staff during its review.

Not Available

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS 235:17381752, 2006 REVIEWSA PEER REVIEWED FORUM Molecular Genetic Cascades for External Genitalia Formation: An Emerging  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

External genitalia are anatomical structures located at the posterior embryonic region as part of several urogenital/reproductive organs. The embryonic anlage of the external genitalia, the genital tubercle (GT) develops as a bud-shaped structure with an initial urethral plate and later urethra. Embryonic external genitalia are considered to be one of the appendages. Recent experiments suggest that essential regulatory genes possess similar functions for the outgrowth regulation of the GT and limb appendages. The transient embryonic epithelia located in the distal GT are called the distal urethral epithelium (DUE) regulating, at least in part, the (distal) GT development. This review covers the available data about early patterning of GT and discusses the molecular developmental similarities and points of divergence between the different appendages. Development of the male and female external genitalia is also reviewed. Developmental Dynamics

H. Kataoka; A. Kuroiwa; Y. Chen

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

446

List of Yucca Mountain Archival Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

List of Yucca Mountain Archival Documents List of Yucca Mountain Archival Documents List of Yucca Mountain Archival Documents March 10, 2004 EIS-0250-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada March 1, 2004 Nuclear Waste Policy Act Document on the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 An Act to provide for the development of repositories for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, to establish a program of research, development, and demonstration regarding the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, and for other purposes. April 1, 2003 Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel A report for the DOE on the Yucca Mountain Project.

447

For Peer Review - Optimization Online  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Mar 15, 2008 ... Here T(q, ?q) denotes the total kinetic, and V (q) the total smooth potential energy of the system. The controls is introduced into the equations of...

448

Documents: Transportation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Transportation PDF Icon Transportation Impact Assessment for Shipment of Uranium Hexafluoride (UF6) Cylinders...

449

Lightweight privacy-preserving peer-to-peer data integration  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Peer Data Management Systems (PDMS) are an attractive solution for managing distributed heterogeneous information. When a peer (client) requests data from another peer (server) with a different schema, translations of the query and its answer are done ...

Ye Zhang; Wai-Kit Wong; S. M. Yiu; Nikos Mamoulis; David W. Cheung

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

451

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

452

Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for the Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents, July 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

<: <: iisS Offlct of Hulth , S.ftly ind St curity OFFICE OF SAFETY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT EVALUATIONS PROTOCOL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF CRITERIA AND REVIEW APPROACH DOCUMENTS July 2013 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for the Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents July 2013 Reviewed by: 1 .. ~~·\? Approved by: William E. Mi.lier Date Deputy Director Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight /\ Thomas R. Stak~r Deputy Director for Oversight Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security

453

Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (LBL Facilities), April 23, 2013 (HSS CRAD 45-58, Rev. 0)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of U.S. Department of Energy Subject: Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immob ilization Plant (LBL Facilities) - C riteria and Review Approach D oc um~ HS: HSS CRAD 45-58 Rev: 0 Eff. Date: April 23, 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Acting Di rec or, Office of Safety and Emergency Nltanagement Evaluations Date: Apri l 23 , 20 13 Criteria and Review Approach Document ~~ trd,James Low Date: April 23 , 20 13 1.0 PURPOSE Within the Office of H.ealth, Safety and Security (HSS), the Office of Enforcement and Overs ight, Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) miss io n is to assess the effectiveness of the environment, safety, health, and emergency management systems and practices used by line and

454

External Technical Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » External Technical Reviews External Technical Reviews Documents Available for Download September 1, 2011 Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010 Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download September 1, 2011 Compilation of ETR Summaries ETR Summaries from 2011 February 15, 2011 External Technical Review Report for Small Column Ion Exchange Technology at Savannah River Site Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download September 30, 2009 External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download June 30, 2009 Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of

455

File Marshal: Automatic extraction of peer-to-peer data  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Digital forensic investigators often find peer-to-peer, or file sharing, software present on the computers, or the images of the disks, that they examine. Investigators must first determine what P2P software is present and where the associated information ... Keywords: File sharing, Forensics, LimeWire, P2P, Peer-to-peer

Frank Adelstein; Robert A. Joyce

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

Advances In Peer-To-Peer Content Search  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Peer-to-peer (P2P) computer networks have recently received tremendous attention due to their inherent scalability and flexibility, which facilitates a broad spectrum of innovative multimedia applications. Such networks rely on the power of participant ... Keywords: Content search, Peer-to-peer

Madjid Merabti; Zhu Liu; Heather Yu; Deepa Kundur

2010-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

457

Documents: Other  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Other PDF Icon Investigation of the Chemical Reactivity of Phosgene in Uranium Hexafluoride 2.6 MB details PDF...

458

Document Control Template-Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 Publication Review and Approval 11_0608.doc608 Page 1 of 3 4 Publication Review and Approval 11_0608.doc608 Page 1 of 3 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Publication Review and Approval Document Number: ITTF-014 Rev. 11_0608 Document Owner: Ben Aragon Backup Owner: Janet Lee Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: ITTP-015 Website Development Maintenance Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): N/A ITTF-014 Publication Review and Approval 11_0608.doc608 Page 2 of 3 Revision History: Rev. Description of Changes A Initial Release 08_0523 Added review section for QA. Added "Approved w/changes" section. Changed "Corrections" and "Reason" to "Recommendations". Adjusted spacing on document. 08_1105 Added review section for Project Manager. Adjusted spacing on document.

459

PeerMon: a peer-to-peer network monitoring system  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We present PeerMon, a peer-to-peer resource monitoring system for general purpose Unix local area network (LAN) systems. PeerMon is designed to monitor system resources on a single LAN, but it also could be deployed on several LANs where some inter-LAN ...

Tia Newhall; Janis Libeks; Ross Greenwood; Jeff Knerr

2010-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

460

Review and Documentation of Research and Technologies on Passage and Protection of Downstream Migrating Catadromous Eels at Hydroele ctric Facilities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents current knowledge on behavior of downstream migrating catadromous eels, engineering and operational factors that influence eel injury and mortality during hydroelectric turbine passage, and the effectiveness of physical and behavioral technologies designed to reduce entrainment and guide eels to safe passage routes. This information will be valuable to industry, resource agencies, private-sector environmental organizations, and universities involved in research, management, and prot...

2001-11-20T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

CAPTURE DOCUMENT ORAUTEAM  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATA DATA CAPTURE DOCUMENT ORAUTEAM ---- Dose Reconstruction ~v~:7 DISCOVERY AND REVIEW dA'~ Project for NIOSH The attached document may contain Privacy Act data. This information is protected by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. §552a; disclosure to any third party without written consent of the individual to whom the information pertains is strictly prohibited. Data Capture Team or Other ORAU Team Member Capturing Data: Complete all information that applies to the data/document being submitted lor uploading to the Site Research Database (SRDB), attach this lonm to the lront olthe document, and send to: ORAU Team, Attention: SRDB Uploading, 4850 Smith Rd., Suite 200, Cincinnati, Ohio 45212. I ~ -!-R"e"guestor and Reviewer 1. Data Requestor: RSET Group 2. Reviewer Name (if different from Requestor): Don Morris 3. Target Data: Document Specified by Requestor Any relevant

462

Document | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002) Microsoft Word - Graphics A-76 Post - MEO VV Review Report F.doc A-76 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS...

463

Wellness Peer Program Volunteer Job Description Wellness Peer Programs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Wellness Peer Program Volunteer Job Description Wellness Peer Programs: Leave The Pack Behind & Wellness Centre, UTSC Mental Wellness ­ mental health awareness program focusing on mental health, coping on healthy relationships, sexually transmitted infections and birth control Health & Wellness Centre

Kronzucker, Herbert J.

464

WIPP Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

a large file size. Environmental Monitoring Documents about environmental monitoring at WIPP, including annual site environmental reports Environmental Protection Agency...

465

Dataplot Documentation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Linear Fitting, Data Analysis, and Mathematics", Proceedings of the ... the printed tutorial documentation does not describe ... Filliben, James J. (1981). ...

2013-11-27T23:59:59.000Z

466

Required Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Required Documents Required Documents Required Documents All foreign nationals, including students and postdocs, must select the foreign nationals employment category to complete the new-hire process. Contact (505) 665-7158 Email Complete following forms before New-Hire Orientation Be sure to bring the forms with you for the orientation event, but do not sign and date: Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification (pdf) - original, unexpired documents for verification of employment eligibility. Please refer to the I-9 verification form titled, "Lists of Acceptable Documents", which was included with your offer letter. (Laminated documents or hospital/temporary birth certificates are not accepted.) Note: Failure to provide required documents will result in delay and/or

467

Peer assessment using arop  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Arop is a web-based peer assessment support tool that has been used extensively in a wide variety of settings over the past three years. We describe the design of Arop and how it can be configured, and present some results from a research ...

John Hamer; Catherine Kell; Fiona Spence

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

Workplace Peers and Entrepreneurship  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We examine whether the likelihood of entrepreneurial activity is related to the prior career experiences of an individual's coworkers, using a unique matched employer--employee panel data set. We argue that coworkers can increase the likelihood that ... Keywords: entrepreneurship, organizational studies, peers, personnel

Ramana Nanda; Jesper B. Srensen

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

Diurnal Availability for Peer-to-Peer Systems  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This paper discusses an efficient approach to design and implement a highly available peer- to-peer system irrespective of peer timing and churn. Although peers in P2P system join or leave at whim, it has been found that most of the peers follow diurnal pattern of availability governed by the time of day effect. When considering a global P2P system, the cyclic behavior of peers situated on diff?erent time zones can be found complementary of one another. Our approach utilizes the diurnal pattern of globally dispersed peers to develop a grouping strategy. The objective of each group is to ensure 24x7 data availability within the group. To represent availability pattern we propose to divide 24 hours of a day into multiple slots and then to express the availability of a particular peer in each slot. In our approach, each peer collects slot availability information of a number of peers and forms small groups of 4 to 8 peers in such a way that the combined availability in each slot within a group is close to 100%. ...

Shahriar, Nashid; Ahmed, Reaz; Boutaba, Raouf

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

Documented Safety Analysis  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Documented Safety Analysis Documented Safety Analysis FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: A document that provides an adequate description of the hazards of a facility during its design, construction, operation, and eventual cleanup and the basis to prescribe operating and engineering controls through Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) or Administrative Controls (AC). REQUIREMENTS:  10 CFR 830.204, Nuclear Safety Rule  DOE-STD-1027-92, Hazard Categorization, 1992.  DOE-STD-1104-96, Change Notice 1, Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Documents (documented Safety Analyses and Technical Safety Requirements), dated May 2002.  DOE-STD-3009-2002, Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses, Change Notice No. 2, April 2002.

471

Balancing Peer and Server Energy Consumption in Large Peer-to-Peer File Distribution Systems  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Balancing Peer and Server Energy Consumption in Large Peer-to-Peer File Distribution Systems. This paper investigates the most energy efficient way to distribute a file to a large number of recipients] has been paid to its energy consumption. This paper considers large scale file distribution

Andrew, Lachlan

472

TAO: Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Home Download Documentation Users Manual and Manual pages Example Programs Installation Changes Publications Referencing TAO Impact Who We Are Acknowledgements License Contact Us...

473

Training / Review Record  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 TrainingReview Record 091006 Page 1 of 4 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Training Review Record Document Number: MGTF-003 Rev. 091006 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa...

474

Suspect Counterfeit Items Criteria Review and Approach Document , Phase 1 - Management - Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Suspect/Counterfeit Items Suspect/Counterfeit Items Criteria Review and Approach Document (CRAD) NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division Phase 1 - Management Performance Objective: Management should have a formal system under Quality Assurance with adequate controls defined and implemented to identify and preclude Suspect/Counterfeit Items (S/CI) from being introduced into safety systems and applications that create potential hazards. CRITERIA: Management should have a formal system of controls in place for assurance that all items procured meet the requirements for their intended use. Management should have a system of mechanisms to continuously maintain current, accurate, updated information on SC/Is and associated suppliers using all available sources. Management should have a training program with detailed records that

475

ELM Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ELM Home Documents ELM Plan ELM Tracts Tract Map ELM at Work ELM Home Documents ELM Plan ELM Tracts Tract Map ELM at Work ELM Documents Committee Charter: The formal charge from the Fermilab director to the ELM committee. Committee Membership: A list of the current members of the ELM committee. Tract Management ELM Plan: The site ecological management plan for the current year. Tract List: A list of links to tract summaries from the latest approved ELM plan. Tract Map: An interactive map showing the locations of the various ELM tracts. Fire Management Non-structural Fire Management Plan: (Microsoft Word Document) Burn Histories: View the burn histories for the relevant ELM tracts. Map of Proposed Burns for the current or upcoming fire management season. This map is interactive and can also display the locations of past burn sites.

476

Key Documents  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

AOCS by-laws, code of ethics and anti trust policy established during our 100+ legacy. Key Documents AOCS History and Governance about us aocs committees contact us division council fats governing board history oils professionals science value cen

477

AFFECTED DOCUMENT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REF I I lOWED BY: (ORG) I I I I I TARGET DATE I CLOSING CCN COMPL DATE CLOSING REF TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION (TSD) BACKFIT (Documents dated prior to 1 November 1988) FUSRAP...

478

INCOMING DOCUMENT CONTROL FORM DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION ORGANIZATIO  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

INCOMING DOCUMENT CONTROL FORM DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION ORGANIZATIO )ATE COMPLETED: ACTION NUMBER: I ! I I DOCUMENT CONTROL DATE INITIALS DATA BASE: ACTION LOG: FILED: To : Doug Tonkay, OTS Decen From: MIchele Landis, dRW Subject: Draft report ~ Result= of the Radiologic; Former Ore Storage Site, Palmerton, Pennsylvania Attached is one copy of the draft report. PIE provide your comments to me by January 16, 1990. tlichele Landis ,9, 1989 "ey at the review and Results of the Radiological SJrvey at the Former Ore S&age Site, Palmerton, PennsylvLnia (PPOOI) J. L Quikd J. W. Cdchdr W. D. &rei ! I : HEALTH AND t5UEI-Y RESEARCH DMSi Waste Management Research and Development Prc (Activity No. AH 10 05 00 0; NEAHOOl) RESULTS OF 'I-HE RADIOLOGICAL SURV

479

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Solution for Smart Grid Renewable Energy Applications - Sheri Nevins, Raytheon & Ron Moss, EnerVault  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012, Raytheon Proprietary and EnerVault Corporation, All Rights Reserved. 2012, Raytheon Proprietary and EnerVault Corporation, All Rights Reserved. 1 Sheri Nevins Raytheon Ktech Ron Mosso EnerVault Corporation DEMONSTRATION OF ENERGY STORAGE USING A BREAKTHROUGH REDOX FLOW BATTERY TECHNOLOGY v. 1-0 Copyright ©2012, Raytheon Proprietary and EnerVault Corporation, All Rights Reserved. 2 Disclaimer This material is partially based upon work supported by NYSERDA under PON1200 Project 15880 NYSERDA has not reviewed the information contained herein, and the opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York. This material is partially based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-OE0000225. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States

480

iPlane Nano: Path Prediction for Peer-to-Peer Applications Harsha V. Madhyastha  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

iPlane Nano: Path Prediction for Peer-to-Peer Applications Harsha V. Madhyastha Ethan Katz present the design and implementa- tion of iPlane Nano, a library for delivering Internet path information to peer-to-peer applications. iPlane Nano is itself a peer-to-peer application, and scales to a large

Krishnamurthy, Arvind

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "documents peer reviews" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

White Paper: A Survey of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Technologies Page 1 of 1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

White Paper: A Survey of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Technologies Page 1 of 1 Athens University Technologies White Paper WHP-2002-03 #12;White Paper: A Survey of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Technologies Page 2 of 2 A Survey of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Technologies White Paper Written by Stephanos Androutsellis

Lu, Paul

482

Introducing artificial evolution into peer-to-peer networks with the distributed remodeling framework  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A peer-to-peer (P2P) network is a complex system whose elements (peer nodes, or simply peers) cooperate to implement scalable distributed services. From a general point of view, the activities of a P2P system are consequences of external inputs coming ... Keywords: Artificial evolution, Complex adaptive system, Peer-to-peer network

Michele Amoretti

2013-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

483

PETSc: Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Documentation Documentation Home Download Features Documentation Manual pages and Users Manual Citing PETSc Tutorials Installation AMS Changes Bug Reporting Code Management FAQ License Linear Solver Table Applications/Publications Miscellaneous External Software Developers Site PETSc is a sophisticated package and fully understanding its usage requires time. However, application programmers can easily begin to use PETSc from a high level and then gradually learn more details according to their needs. Users should read the users manual before attempting to do any serious coding with PETSc! PETSc users manual - pdf (fully searchable with hyperlinks) Index of all help topics Index of all manual pages Strategies for using PETSc with Fortran PETSc Manual Pages and Examples MPI TAO Vector Operations (Vec)

484

Echelon: Peer-to-Peer Network Diagnosis with Network Coding  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to minutes or even hours are still valuable. However, such historical and delay-tolerant observations should a historical period of time is referred to as a diagnosis. In this paper, we present Echelon, a time streaming rate, the number of upstream and downstream peers, the latency to neighbor peer