Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Program on Technology Innovation: Utility Requirements Document - Revision 9  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Revision 9 updates the Utility Requirements Document (URD) with a comprehensive set of detailed requirements for new light water reactor (LWR) designs. The revision is based on industry research and development (R&D) accomplished since the document's last revision. By providing plant designers with a thorough set of industry requirements, the URD allows designers to better understand utility expectations and provide compliant nuclear plant designs. Due to the large number of requirements and the need to ...

2008-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

2

Supplemental design requirements document, Project W026. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect

This document supplements and extends the Functional Design Criteria, SP-W026-FDC-001, for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility (WRAP), Module 1. It provides additional detailed requirements, summarizes key Westinghouse Hanford Company design guidance, and establishes baseline technical agreements to be used in definitive design of the WRAP-1 facility. Revision 3 of the Supplemental Design Requirements Document has been assigned an Impact Level of 3ESQ based on the content of the entire revision. The actual changes made from Revision 2 have an Impact Level of 3S and the basis for these changes was previously reviewed and approved per WHC correspondence No. 9355770.

Weidert, J.R.

1993-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

3

Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents, May 2009 (Revised) (Book)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

www.femp.energy.gov ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program Revised June 2013 DOE/GO-102009-2588 UESCs: Enabling Documents 1 Department of Energy Washington, D.C. Dear Colleagues, The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is pleased to present this third edition of Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents. These documents provide a selected set of background information materials that clarify the authority for Federal agencies to enter into utility energy services

4

Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents, May 2009 (Revised) (Book)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

www.femp.energy.gov ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program Revised June 2013 DOE/GO-102009-2588 UESCs: Enabling Documents 1 Department of Energy Washington, D.C. Dear Colleagues, The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is pleased to present this third edition of Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents. These documents provide a selected set of background information materials that clarify the authority for Federal agencies to enter into utility energy services

5

Transportation system requirements document. Revision 1 DCN01. Supplement  

SciTech Connect

The original Transportation System Requirements Document described the functions to be performed by and the technical requirements for the Transportation System to transport spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) from Purchaser and Producer sites to a Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) site, and between CRWMS sites. The purpose of that document was to define the system-level requirements. These requirements include design and operations requirements to the extent they impact on the development of the physical segments of Transportation. The document also presented an overall description of Transportation, its functions, its segments, and the requirements allocated to the segments and the system-level interfaces with Transportation. This revision of the document contains only the pages that have been modified.

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

6

Guidance document for revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document provides guidance for the revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, ``Radioactive Waste Management.`` Technical Working Groups have been established and are responsible for writing the revised order. The Technical Working Groups will use this document as a reference for polices and procedures that have been established for the revision process. The overall intent of this guidance is to outline how the order will be revised and how the revision process will be managed. In addition, this document outlines technical issues considered for inclusion by a Department of Energy Steering Committee.

Kudera, D.E.; McMurtrey, C.D.; Meagher, B.G.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

7

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory installation roadmap document. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

The roadmapping process was initiated by the US Department of Energy`s office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) to improve its Five-Year Plan and budget allocation process. Roadmap documents will provide the technical baseline for this planning process and help EM develop more effective strategies and program plans for achieving its long-term goals. This document is a composite of roadmap assumptions and issues developed for the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) by US Department of Energy Idaho Field Office and subcontractor personnel. The installation roadmap discusses activities, issues, and installation commitments that affect waste management and environmental restoration activities at the INEL. The High-Level Waste, Land Disposal Restriction, and Environmental Restoration Roadmaps are also included.

1993-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

8

Acronyms, initialisms, and abbreviations: Fourth Revision  

SciTech Connect

This document lists acronyms used in technical writing. The immense list is supplemented by an appendix containing chemical elements, classified information access, common abbreviations used for functions, conversion factors for selected SI units, a flowcharting template, greek alphabet, metrix terminology, proofreader`s marks, signs and symbols, and state abbreviations.

Tolman, B.J. [comp.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

Environmental restoration and decontamination & decommissioning safety documentation. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This document presents recommendations of a working group designated by the Environmental Restoration and Remediation (ER) and Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) subcommittees of the Westinghouse M&O (Management and Operation) Nuclear Facility Safety Committee. A commonalty of approach to safety documentation specific to ER and D&D activities was developed and is summarized below. Allowance for interpretative tolerance and documentation flexibility appropriate to the activity, graded for hazard category, duration, and complexity, was a primary consideration in development of this guidance.

Hansen, J.L. [Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC (United States); Frauenholz, L.H. [Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Co., Inc. (United States); Kerr, N.R. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States)

1993-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

10

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory installation roadmap assumptions document. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This document is a composite of roadmap assumptions developed for the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) by the US Department of Energy Idaho Field Office and subcontractor personnel as a key element in the implementation of the Roadmap Methodology for the INEL Site. The development and identification of these assumptions in an important factor in planning basis development and establishes the planning baseline for all subsequent roadmap analysis at the INEL.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

11

Solar Power Tower Design Basis Document, Revision 0  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report contains the design basis for a generic molten-salt solar power tower. A solar power tower uses a field of tracking mirrors (heliostats) that redirect sunlight on to a centrally located receiver mounted on top a tower, which absorbs the concentrated sunlight. Molten nitrate salt, pumped from a tank at ground level, absorbs the sunlight, heating it up to 565 C. The heated salt flows back to ground level into another tank where it is stored, then pumped through a steam generator to produce steam and make electricity. This report establishes a set of criteria upon which the next generation of solar power towers will be designed. The report contains detailed criteria for each of the major systems: Collector System, Receiver System, Thermal Storage System, Steam Generator System, Master Control System, and Electric Heat Tracing System. The Electric Power Generation System and Balance of Plant discussions are limited to interface requirements. This design basis builds on the extensive experience gained from the Solar Two project and includes potential design innovations that will improve reliability and lower technical risk. This design basis document is a living document and contains several areas that require trade-studies and design analysis to fully complete the design basis. Project- and site-specific conditions and requirements will also resolve open To Be Determined issues.

ZAVOICO,ALEXIS B.

2001-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

12

UMTRA Surface Project management action process document: Final. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Title 1 of the UMTRCA authorized the DOE to undertake remedial actions at these designed sites and associated vicinity properties (VP), which contain uranium mill tailings and other residual radioactive materials (RRM) derived from the processing sites. Title 2 of the UMTRCA addresses uranium mill sites that were licensed at the time the UMTRCA was enacted. Cleanup of these Title 2 sites is the responsibility of the licensees. The cleanup of the Title 1 sites has been split into two separate projects: the Surface Project, which deals with the mill buildings, tailings, and contaminated soils at the sites and VPs; and the Ground Water Project, which is limited to the contaminated ground water at the sites. This management action process (MAP) document discusses the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Surface Project. Since its inception through March 1996, the Surface Project (hereinafter called the Project) has cleaned up 16 of the 24 designated processing sites and approximately 5,000 VPs, reducing the risk to human health and the environment posed by the uranium mill tailings. Two of the 24 sites, Belfield and Bowman, North Dakota, will not be remediated at the request of the state, reducing the total number of sites to 22. By the start of FY1998, the remaining 6 processing sites and associated VPs will be cleaned up. The remedial action activities to be funded in FY1998 by the FY1998 budget request are remediation of the remaining Grand Junction, Colorado, VPs; closure of the Cheney disposal cell in Grand Junction, Colorado; and preparation of the completion reports for 4 completed sites.

NONE

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

13

Technical support document for proposed revision of the model energy code thermal envelope requirements  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the council of American Building Officials` (CABO) 1993 supplement to the 1992 Model Energy Code (MEC) (referred to as the 1993 MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for single-family and low-rise multifamily residences. The goal of this analysis was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determined the most cost-effective (least total life-cycle cost [LCC]) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) for residences in different locations. The ECMs with the lowest LCC were used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U{sub o}-value (thermal transmittance) curves in the MEC format. The changes proposed here affect the requirements for ``group R`` residences. The group R residences are detached one- and two-family dwellings (referred to as single-family) and all other residential buildings three stories or less (referred to as multifamily).

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

14

Technical support document for proposed revision of the model energy code thermal envelope requirements  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the council of American Building Officials' (CABO) 1993 supplement to the 1992 Model Energy Code (MEC) (referred to as the 1993 MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for single-family and low-rise multifamily residences. The goal of this analysis was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determined the most cost-effective (least total life-cycle cost [LCC]) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) for residences in different locations. The ECMs with the lowest LCC were used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U[sub o]-value (thermal transmittance) curves in the MEC format. The changes proposed here affect the requirements for group R'' residences. The group R residences are detached one- and two-family dwellings (referred to as single-family) and all other residential buildings three stories or less (referred to as multifamily).

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

15

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

34 Federal Register 34 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Notices public an opportunity to comment on the Guidance Memoranda prior to their approval. On May 6, 2005, a Notice of Availability was placed in the Federal Register (70 FR 24008) inviting the public to comment on the final draft of the Guidance Memoranda. As a result of public comment we received on the final draft, we have revised the Guidance Memoranda and invite the public to comment on the revised final draft. The programmatic regulations also require the concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior and the Governor of Florida on the Guidance Memoranda prior to their approval. An electronic copy of the guidance memoranda document is available at: http:// www.evergladesplan.org/pm/

16

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5/R3 5/R3 Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Terrestrial Plants: 1997 Revision This document has been approved by the East Tennessee Technology Park Technical Information Office for release to the public. Date: ES/ER/TM-85/R3 Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Terrestrial Plants: 1997 Revision R. A. Efroymson M. E. Will G. W. Suter II A. C. Wooten Date Issued-November 1997 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management under budget and reporting code EW 20 LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. managing the Environmental Management Activities at the East Tennessee Technology Park Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Oak Ridge National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant

17

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. In addition to updating previous information, Revision 1 adds citations from the NRC Inspection Manual and the Improved Standard Technical Specifications. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Generic Letters, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Ankrum, A.; Nickolaus, J.; Vinther, R.; Maguire-Moffitt, N.; Hammer, J.; Sherfey, L.; Warner, R. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

18

Technical support document for proposed 1994 revision of the MEC thermal envelope requirements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the Council of American Building Officials` (CABO) 1994 supplement to the 1993 Model Energy Code (MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for maximum component U{sub 0}-value. The 1994 amendments to the 1993 MEC were established in last year`s code change cycle and did not change the envelope requirements. The research underlying the proposed MEC revision was conducted by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) for the US Department of Energy (DOE) Building Energy Standards program. The goal of this research was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determines the most cost-effective (least total cost) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) (insulation levels and window types) for residential buildings. This least-cost set of ECMs was used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U{sub 0}-values (thermal transmittances). ECMs include window types (for example, double-pane vinyl) and insulation levels (for example, R-19) for ceilings, walls, and floors.

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

Safety System Oversight Program Assessment Criteria and Review Approach Document (CRAD), Revision 0  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of 7 of 7 Safety System Oversight (SSO) Program Implementation Assessment Criteria and Review Approach Documents (CRADs) Revision 0 PROGRAM (PGM) OBJECTIVE PGM.1 An effective SSO Program is established by the Field Element Manager to apply engineering expertise to maintain safety system configuration and to assess system condition and effectiveness of safety management program implementation. Criteria PGM.1.1 The SSO Qualification Program is part of the Technical Qualification Program (DOE M 426.1-1A, Chapter III, Section 1, 2.b (1)). PGM.1.2 The SSO Program establishes appropriate training, qualification, and performance requirements for SSO personnel and the supervisors are held accountable for achieving them (DOE M 426.1-1A, Chapter III, Section 1, 2.b

20

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Federal Register 8 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 233 / Monday, December 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 1 A discussion of NEPA applicability is beyond the scope of this guidance. For more information see CEQ, The Citizen's Guide to the National Environmental Policy Act, available at ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/Citizens_Guide_Dec07.pdf. 2 For more information on this announcement, see http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ ceq/initiatives/nepa. 3 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Draft Guidance, Establishing, Applying, and Revising Categorical Exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act, 75 FR 8045, Feb. 23, 2010. COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 40 CFR Parts 1500, 1501, 1502, 1503, 1504, 1505, 1506, 1507, and 1508 Final Guidance for Federal Departments and Agencies on

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Preliminary design requirements document for the initial single-shell tank retrieval system  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The scope of this Preliminary Design Requirements Document is to identify and define the functions, with associated requirements, which must be performed to demonstrate and accomplish the initial single-shell tank saltcake retrieval from selected tanks. This document sets forth functions, requirements, performance requirements and design constraints necessary to begin conceptual design for the Initial Single-shell Tank Retrieval System. System and physical interfaces between the Initial Single-shell Tank Retrieval System project and the Tank Waste Remediation are identified. The constraints, performance requirements, and transfer of information and data across a technical interface will be documented in an Interface Control Document. The design requirements provided in this document will be augmented by additional detailed design to be documented by the project.

Hertzel, J.S., Westinghouse Hanford

1996-07-24T23:59:59.000Z

22

Small job development software project documentation for the activity management system. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This document contains all the required software development documentation as required by WHC-CM-3-10, software practices.

Gates, T.A.; Burdick, M.B.

1994-09-22T23:59:59.000Z

23

Control of External Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 Control of External Documents Process 11_0304 Page 1 of 5 2 Control of External Documents Process 11_0304 Page 1 of 5 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: Control of External Documents Process Document Number P-002 Rev 11_0304 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: Q-001, Quality Manual Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): REG-002, External Document Register P-002 Control of External Documents Process 11_0304 Page 2 of 5 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 11_0304 Changed revision format from alpha character to numbers; modified process to include a step directing addition to REG-002 External Document Register and changed verbiage to clarify and more accurately reflect current process.

24

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4-1 4-1 Records Management Self-Assessment Revised Version Issued as P200.4-1B LM Procedure 200.4-1, Records Management Self-Assessment of 4/17/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.4-1A with LM Procedure 200.4-1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 8 pages, 2 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

25

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes Summary of Changes to Procedure 243.1 Records Inventory Revised Version Issued as P 243.1B LM Procedure 243.1A, Records Inventory of 7/18/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and to ensure the references cited and associated forms remain current. Please replace LM Procedure 243.1A with LM Procedure 243.1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 9 pages, 3 attachments

26

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

-2 -2 Processing Inactive Records Revised Version Issued as P 200.2-2B LM Procedure 200.2-2A, Processing Internal Inactive Records for Storage of 7/18/07, has undergone revision. The revised procedure includes updated references, definitions, and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.2-2A with LM Procedure 200.2-2B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. Procedure 200.2-2B INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 10 pages, 4 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

27

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

transmission systems are based on a TRR that includes CVP and other non-Federal generator costs for providing VAR Support. The proposed revision to the TRR will remove the...

28

Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Discovery of Uranium Discovery of Uranium Uranium was discovered in 1789 by Martin Klaproth, a German chemist, who isolated an oxide of uranium while analyzing pitchblende samples from the Joachimsal silver mines in the former Kingdom of Bohemia located in the present day Czech Republic. more facts >> Mailing List Signup Receive e-mail updates about this project and web site. your e-mail address Sign Me Up Search: OK Button DUF6 Guide DU Uses DUF6 Management and Uses DUF6 Conversion EIS Documents News FAQs Internet Resources Glossary Home » Documents Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Depleted UF6 Management Program Documents Downloadable documents about depleted UF6 management and related topics, including Depleted UF6 Conversion and Programmatic EIS documents

29

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

459 Federal Register 459 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations PART 952-SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES ■ 15. The authority citation for part 952 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 2282a; 2282b; 2282c; 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq. ■ 16. Section 952.247-70 is amended by: ■ a. Revising the date of the clause to read as set forth below; and ■ b. Removing ''or its successor Official Foreign Travel, or any subsequent version of the order'' in the clause and adding in its place ''Official Foreign Travel, or its successor''. The revision reads as follows: 952.247-70 Foreign travel. * * * * * FOREIGN TRAVEL JUN 2010 * * * * * PARTS 928, 931, 932, 933, 936, 937, 941, 942, 950, 951, and 952

30

Documents  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

documents en MHK LCOE Reporting documents en MHK LCOE Reporting Guidance Draft http://en.openei.org/community/document/mhk-lcoe-reporting-guidance-draft To normalize competing claims of LCOE, DOE has developed-for its own use-a standardized cost and performance data reporting process to facilitate uniform calculation of LCOE from MHK device developers. This standardization framework is only the first version in what is anticipated to be an iterative process that involves industry and the broader DOE stakeholder community. Multiple files are attached here for review and comment.document/mhk-lcoe-reporting-guidance-draft" target="_blank">read more http://en.openei.org/community/document/mhk-lcoe-reporting-guidance-draft#comments

31

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

558 Federal Register 558 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 203 / Thursday, October 22, 2009 / Notices If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339. VIII. Other Information Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed under For Further Information Contact in Section VII of this notice. Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ fedregister. To use PDF, you must have Adobe

32

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

58 Federal Register 58 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 207 / Friday, October 24, 2008 / Notices 1 Public Law No. 101-552, section 3, as amended by Public Law 104-320, section 4(a); see 5 U.S.C. 571 note. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Alternative Dispute Resolution AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Revised Policy Statement. SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. 571 et seq. Today, DOE issues a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment

33

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5R1 Guide for Developing Data Quality Objectives for Ecological Risk Assessment at DOE Oak Ridge Operations Facilities This document has been approved by the K-25 Site Technical...

34

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

44 Federal Register 44 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2011 / Notices not anticipate recurrence of violations that gave rise to this PDL. As a result, under the authority in 20 U.S.C. 1234a(j), the Department has determined that compromise of this claim to $675,000 is appropriate. The public is invited to comment on the Department's intent to compromise this claim. Additional information may be obtained by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ fedregister. To use PDF you must have

35

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Online links at http: www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet access who will eFile a document andor be listed as a contact for an intervenor must...

36

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the EIS and requests to be added to the document mailing list should be addressed to: Dr. Jerry Pell, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20), U.S. Department...

37

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

compliance with Commission submission guidelines at http: www.ferc.govhelpsubmission- guide.asp. Comments may be eFiled. The eFiling option under the Documents & Filings tab on...

38

Preliminary design requirements document (DRD) for Project W-236B, ``Initial Pretreatment Module``  

SciTech Connect

The scope of this Design Requirements Document (DRD) is to identify and define the functions, with associated requirements, which must be performed to separate Hanford Site tank waste supernatants into low-level and high-level fractions. This documents sets forth function requirements, performance requirements, and design constraints necessary to begin conceptual design for the Initial Pretreatment Module (IPM). System and physical interfaces between the IPM project and the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) are identified. The constraints, performance requirements, and transfer of information and data across a technical interface will be documented in an Interface Control Document. Supplemental DRDs will be prepared to provide more detailed requirements specific to systems described in the DRD.

Swanson, L.M.

1995-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

39

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28 Federal Register 28 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2011 / Notices information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any agency's ability to perform its statutory obligations. The Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the information collection. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5)

40

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

49 Federal Register 49 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Notices with any agency's ability to perform its statutory obligations. The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes that notice containing proposed information collection requests prior to submission of these requests to OMB. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

69 69 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2002 / Notices NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-302] Florida Power Corporation; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted the request of Florida Power Corporation (the licensee) to withdraw its August 14, 2002, application for proposed amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-72 for Crystal River, Unit No. 2, located in Citrus County, Florida. The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical Specifications pertaining to two inoperable control complex chillers. The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment published in

42

Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document, Volume 2, Revision 8: ALWR Evolutionary Plant  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

EPRI's ALWR Program has been an industry-wide effort to establish the technical foundation for design of the advanced light water reactor (ALWR). This program included participation and sponsorship of several international utility companies and close cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy. The cornerstone of the ALWR Program is a set of utility design requirements, which are contained in the ALWR Utility Requirements Document. The purpose of this document is to present a clear, complete statement...

1999-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

43

Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document, Volume 3, Revision 8: ALWR Passive Plant  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

EPRI's ALWR Program has been an industry-wide effort to establish the technical foundation for design of the advanced light water reactor (ALWR). This program included participation and sponsorship of several international utility companies and close cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy. The cornerstone of the ALWR Program is a set of utility design requirements, which are contained in the ALWR Utility Requirements Document. The purpose of this document is to present a clear, complete statement...

1999-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

44

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

988 Federal Register 988 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rulemakings. In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to http:// www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm. Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the Commission's calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/ EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related information.

45

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

72 72 TITLE 28-JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1495 EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 97-164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97-164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. § 1495. Damages for unjust conviction and im- prisonment; claim against United States The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim for damages by any person unjustly convicted of an offense against the United States and imprisoned. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 97-164, title I, § 133(c)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 102-572, title IX, § 902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on section 729 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed.,

46

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 7, 2005 July 7, 2005 Part II Department of Energy 10 CFR Part 625 Price Competitive Sale of Strategic Petroleum Reserve Petroleum; Standard Sales Provisions; Final Rule VerDate jul2003 19:47 Jul 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\07JYR2.SGM 07JYR2 39364 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 625 RIN 1901-AB15 Price Competitive Sale of Strategic Petroleum Reserve Petroleum; Standard Sales Provisions AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule; revised appendix. SUMMARY: On December 21, 1983, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a final rule governing the price competitive sales of petroleum from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) in the event that the SPR

47

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Federal Register 3 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 14 / Friday, January 23, 2009 / Notices 1 The GAP Material addressed in this Revised Record of Decision also includes certain non-U.S.- origin unirradiated fuel (fresh fuel) containing HEU. ADDRESSES: Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and Conference Center; 5701 Marinelli Road, North Bethesda, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Perine, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, Germantown Building, Independence Avenue, Washington, DC 20585; Telephone: (301) 903-3081. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is to provide advice and guidance with respect to the basic energy sciences research program. Tentative Agenda: Agenda will include discussions of the following:

48

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 9, 2006 Part III Department of Energy 10 CFR Parts 600 and 603 Assistance Regulations; Final Rule VerDate Aug2005 17:47 May 08, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09MYR3.SGM 09MYR3 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES3 27158 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Parts 600 and 603 RIN 1991-AB72 Assistance Regulations AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is adopting, with minor changes, the interim final rule published on November 15, 2005, that established a new part to the DOE assistance regulations and revised 10 CFR part 600, subpart A to conform with the new part. The new part establishes policies and

49

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

69 69 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2002 / Rules and Regulations and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: March 12, 2002. Peter Caulkins, Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows: PART 180-[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346(a) and 371. § 180.434 [Amended] 2. In § 180.434, amend the table in paragraph (b) by revising the ''Expiration/revocation date'' ''12/31/ 01'' for the commodity ''Blueberrries'' to read ''12/31/03.'' [FR Doc. 02-7494 Filed 3-27-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 48 CFR Parts 902, 904, 909, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 925, 931, 933, 950, 952,

50

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

68720 68720 Vol. 74, No. 248 Tuesday, December 29, 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 1021 Request for Information Regarding Categorical Exclusions AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) intends to update its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) categorical exclusions, and seeks input from interested parties to help identify activities that should be considered for new or revised categorical exclusions. DATES: Responses should be e-mailed or postmarked by January 25, 2010. Late responses will be considered to the extent practicable. ADDRESSES: E-mail submissions are encouraged due to the delivery time required for mail, and should be sent to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov. Alternatively, submissions may be faxed

51

Document:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 FUNDAMENTAL MODE FREQUENCY OF THE STORAGE RING SINGLE CELL CAVITY May 6, 1992 Revised May 27, 1992 Yoon W. Kang RF Group Advanced Photon Source The fundamental mode frequency of the prototype storage ring cavity has been measured with various port terminations and cavity temperatures. Since the highest tuned frequency of the prototype cavity with a tuner under the high RF power test condition is measured to be lower than the system specified frequency, a slight dimensional change in the cavity design is required for manufacturing future cavities. In addition to this, an extra dimensional correction is required to compensate the volume changes due to the tuner position and increased port sizes. In the fol- lowing, the measured frequencies and the estimated frequency shift due to the volume changes

52

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

37 Federal Register 37 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 10, 2008 / Rules and Regulations PART 762-GUARANTEED FARM LOANS I 1. The authority citation for part 762 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1989. § 762.148 [Amended] I 2. Amend § 762.148(d)(1) by removing the second sentence. I 3. Amend § 762.149 by revising paragraphs (b)(1) introductory text, (b)(1)(v), (d) introductory text, (d)(2), (i)(1), and (i)(5) to read as set forth below. § 762.149 Liquidation. * * * * * (b) * * * (1) Within 150 days after the payment due date, all lenders will prepare a liquidation plan. Standard eligible and CLP lenders will submit a written liquidation plan to the Agency which includes: * * * * * (v) An estimated loss claim must be filed no later than 150 days past the

53

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

69 Federal Register 69 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 140 / Friday, July 21, 2006 / Rules and Regulations GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 41 CFR Parts 101-48 and 102-41 [FPMR Amendment 2006-05; FPMR Case 2004-101-1; FMR Case 2004-102-2] RIN 3090-AH11 Federal Property Management Regulations; Disposition of Seized, Forfeited, Voluntarily Abandoned, and Unclaimed Personal Property AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services Administration (GSA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is amending the Federal Property Management Regulations (FPMR) by revising coverage on utilization, donation, or disposal of abandoned and forfeited personal property and moving it into the Federal Management Regulation (FMR). A cross-reference is added to the FPMR

54

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Federal Register 0 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/ news/fedregister. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ index.html. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a; 21 U.S.C. 862(a)(1). Dated: November 10, 2010. James F. Manning, Chief of Staff, Federal Student Aid, U.S. Department of Education. [FR Doc. 2010-28856 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [OE Docket No. PP-371]

55

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

667 Federal Register 667 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 3, 2009 / Notices Part 1 Chapter 3 of the TGDC Recommendations, with the exception of Chapter 3's performance benchmark requirements. Part 1 Chapter 3 of the TGDC Recommendations is primarily a maintenance level upgrade to the 2005 VVSG with minor modifications, clarifications, and a few additions including performance and poll worker usability requirements. (The VSS 2002 contained almost no usability, accessibility, and privacy requirements. As a result, the 2005 VVSG Section 3 was mostly new material based on research, best practices, and standards relating to human factors and the design of user interfaces as they apply to voting systems.) 7. System Security Documentation Requirements-Security documentation

56

Acceptable knowledge document for INEEL stored transuranic waste -- Rocky Flats Plant waste. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document and supporting documentation provide a consistent, defensible, and auditable record of acceptable knowledge for waste generated at the Rocky Flats Plant which is currently in the accessible storage inventory at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. The inventory consists of transuranic (TRU) waste generated from 1972 through 1989. Regulations authorize waste generators and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities to use acceptable knowledge in appropriate circumstances to make hazardous waste determinations. Acceptable knowledge includes information relating to plant history, process operations, and waste management, in addition to waste-specific data generated prior to the effective date of the RCRA regulations. This document is organized to provide the reader a comprehensive presentation of the TRU waste inventory ranging from descriptions of the historical plant operations that generated and managed the waste to specific information about the composition of each waste group. Section 2 lists the requirements that dictate and direct TRU waste characterization and authorize the use of the acceptable knowledge approach. In addition to defining the TRU waste inventory, Section 3 summarizes the historical operations, waste management, characterization, and certification activities associated with the inventory. Sections 5.0 through 26.0 describe the waste groups in the inventory including waste generation, waste packaging, and waste characterization. This document includes an expanded discussion for each waste group of potential radionuclide contaminants, in addition to other physical properties and interferences that could potentially impact radioassay systems.

NONE

1998-01-23T23:59:59.000Z

57

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

52841 52841 Vol. 67, No. 157 Wednesday, August 14, 2002 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Federal Crop Insurance Corporation 7 CFR Part 457 Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Sugarcane Crop Insurance Provisions AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA. ACTION: Final rule; correction. SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final rule, Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Sugarcane Crop Insurance Provisions that the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation published in the Federal Register on Friday, July 12, 2002 (67 FR 46093- 46096). EFFECTIVE DATE: August 14, 2002. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arden Routh, Risk Management Specialist, Product Development Division, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, United States Department of Agriculture, 6501 Beacon Drive,

58

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22 Federal Register 22 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Notices wildlife resources, including protected species; cultural resources; and other impacts identified through scoping, public involvement and interagency coordination. f. Scoping: An initial scoping letter was sent to stakeholders in the southwest Florida region in April, 2006, as notification of the initiation of a Feasibility Study to address the water resource problems in southwest Florida. An additional scoping letter will be used to invite comments on alternatives and issues from Federal, State, and local agencies, affected Indian tribes, and other interested private organizations and individuals. g. DEIS Preparation: The integrated Feasibility Report, including a DEIS, is

59

Advanced Nuclear Technology Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document, Revision 12  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The utility requirement document (URD) is an industry-developed technical foundation for the design of advanced light water reactors (ALWRs). It was created with the objective of providing a comprehensive set of plant functional requirements that are considered important to utilities considering the construction of a nuclear plant and in ensuring successful deployment and operation of the plant. The scope of the URD is broad, addressing the entire plant (including the nuclear steam supply system, ...

2013-12-16T23:59:59.000Z

60

Supplemental design requirements document, Multifunction Waste Tank Facility, Project W-236A. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

The Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility (MWTF) consists of four, nominal 1 million gallon, underground double-shell tanks, located in the 200-East area, and two tanks of the same capacity in the 200-West area. MWTF will provide environmentally safe storage capacity for wastes generated during remediation/retrieval activities of existing waste storage tanks. This document delineates in detail the information to be used for effective implementation of the Functional Design Criteria requirements.

Groth, B.D.

1995-01-11T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

586 586 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 1999 / Notices Telephone: (202) 205-9817. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1- 800-877-8339. However, the Department is not able to reproduce in an alternate format the standard forms included in the application package. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sylvia Johnson, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW. (room 3318, Switzer Building), Washington, DC 20202-2649. Telephone (202) 205-9312. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1- 800-877-8339. Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print,

62

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

May 22, 2000 Part III Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 261 Regulatory Determination on Wastes from the Combustion of Fossil Fuels; Final Rule VerDate 112000 16:01 May 19, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\22MYR3.SGM pfrm02 PsN: 22MYR3 32214 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 99 / Monday, May 22, 2000 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 261 [FRL-6588-1] RIN 2050-AD91 Notice of Regulatory Determination on Wastes From the Combustion of Fossil Fuels AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Regulatory determination. SUMMARY: This document explains EPA's determination of whether regulation of fossil fuel combustion wastes is warranted under subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Today's action

63

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

945 Federal Register 945 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices 1 The full text of the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage is available at http://www.iaea.org/Publication/ Documents/Infircs/1998/infcirc567.shtml. A detailed interpretation of the CSC and its provisions is contained in ''The 1997 Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage and the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage-Explanatory Texts,'' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (''Explanatory Texts''). International Law Series No. 3 (2007). The Explanatory Texts is available at http://www- pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/ Pub1279_web.pdf . 2 SDR is the unit of account defined by the International Monetary Fund (''IMF'') and used by

64

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51 Federal Register 51 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2011 / Notices VII. Agency Contact See chart in the Award Information section in this notice for the name, room number and telephone number of the contact person for each competition. You can write to the contact person at the following address: U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2600. If you use a TDD, call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800- 877-8339. VIII. Other Information Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the Grants and Contracts

65

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

902 Federal Register 902 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 15 / Monday, January 25, 2010 / Notices including Comments Resolution Matrixes (CRMs) and track changed documents, will be posted at: http:// www.losangeles.af.mil/library/ factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9364. Please send all CRM comments to Vimal Gopal by 5 February 2010. DATES: 12 February 2010: IS-GPS-200E. 8 a.m.-12 p.m. (Pacific Time). Dial-In Information: Phone: 1-800- FON-SAIC (1-800-366-7242). Code: 4511074. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vimal Gopal, vimal.gopal.ctr@losangeles.af.mil, 1- 310-909-7294 or Captain Neal Roach, neal.roach@losangeles.af.mil, 1-310- 653-3771. Bao-Anh Trinh, Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 2010-1273 Filed 1-22-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-05-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

66

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

79 Federal Register 79 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices of a portion of National Guard Avenue to meet recommended stand-off distance between perimeter fence and mission critical resources and personnel). The decision was based on matters discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Proposed Realignment of National Guard Avenue and New Main Gate Construction, inputs from the public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final EIS was made available to the public on August 13, 2010 through a NOA in the Federal Register (Volume 75, Number 156, Page 49487) with a wait period that ended on September 14, 2010. The ROD documents only the decision of the Air Force with respect to the proposed Air Force actions analyzed

67

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 79 / Thursday, April 24, 2003 / Notices j. Deadline for filing comments and/ or motions: May 19, 2003. All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with: Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Please include the project number (P- 10855-005) on any comments or motions filed. k. Description of Request: Upper Peninsula Power Company (UPPCO) proposes to add additional acreage to the project boundary in the area of the Emergency Fuse Plug. The additional acres are necessary for project operations. l. Location of the Application: A copy of the application is available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference Room,

68

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

July 2, 2008 Part V The President Executive Order 13467-Reforming Processes Related to Suitability for Government Employment, Fitness for Contractor Employees, and Eligibility for Access to Classified National Security Information VerDate Aug2005 18:32 Jul 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\02JYE0.SGM 02JYE0 hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS2 VerDate Aug2005 18:32 Jul 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\02JYE0.SGM 02JYE0 hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS2 Presidential Documents 38103 Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 128 Wednesday, July 2, 2008 Title 3- The President Executive Order 13467 of June 30, 2008 Reforming Processes Related to Suitability for Government Employment, Fitness for Contractor Employees, and Eligi-

69

Document  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

44786 Federal Register 44786 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 148 / Thursday, July 31, 2008 / Notices same file as the submission itself, and not as separate files. Petitions will be available for public inspection by appointment with the staff of the USTR Public Reading Room, except for information granted ''business confidential'' status pursuant to 15 CFR 2003.6. If the submission contains business confidential information, a non-confidential version of the submission must also be submitted that indicates where confidential information was redacted by inserting asterisks where material was deleted. In addition, the confidential submission must be clearly marked ''BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL'' in large, bold letters at the top and bottom of every page of the documents. The public version that does not contain

70

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Federal Register 2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2011 / Notices it is recommended that documents be transmitted by overnight mail, by electronic mail to Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov, or by facsimile to 202-586-8008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Lawrence (Program Office) 202-586-5260. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exports of electricity from the United States to a foreign country are regulated by the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to sections 301(b) and 402(f) of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7151(b), 7172(f)) and require authorization under section 202(e) of the FPA (16 U.S.C.824a(e)). On August 31, 1999 the Department of Energy (DOE) issued Order No. EA-216, which authorized TEMUS to transmit electric energy from the United States to

71

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

945 Federal Register 945 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices 1 The full text of the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage is available at http://www.iaea.org/Publication/ Documents/Infircs/1998/infcirc567.shtml. A detailed interpretation of the CSC and its provisions is contained in ''The 1997 Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage and the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage-Explanatory Texts,'' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (''Explanatory Texts''). International Law Series No. 3 (2007). The Explanatory Texts is available at http://www- pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/ Pub1279_web.pdf . 2 SDR is the unit of account defined by the International Monetary Fund (''IMF'') and used by

72

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

197 Federal Register 197 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 117 / Friday, June 19, 2009 / Notices Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings. Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/ Information Management Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 22209-2133. Dated: May 31, 2009.

73

Test and evaluation document for DOT Specification 7A Type A Packaging. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has been conducting, through several of its operating contractors, an evaluation and testing program to qualify Type A radioactive material packagings per US Department of Transportation (DOT) Specification 7A (DOT-7A) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 49, Part 178 (49 CFR 178). The program is currently administered by the DOE, Office of Facility Safety Analysis, DOE/EH-32, at DOE-Headquarters (DOE-HQ) in Germantown, Maryland. This document summarizes the evaluation and testing performed for all of the packagings successfully qualified in this program.

NONE

1996-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

74

UMTRA Surface Project management action process document. Final report: Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A critical mission of the US Department of Energy (DOE) is the planning, implementation, and completion of environmental restoration (ER) programs at facilities that were operated by or in support of the former Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) from the late 1940s into the 1970s. Among these facilities are the 24 former uranium mill sites designed in the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978 (42 USC {section} 7901 et seq.) Title 1 of the UMTRCA authorized the DOE to undertake remedial actions at these designated sites and associated vicinity properties (VP), which contain uranium mill tailings and other residual radioactive materials (RRM) derived from the processing sites. Title 2 of the UMTRCA addresses uranium mill sites that were licensed at the time the UMTRCA was enacted. Cleanup of these Title 2 sites is the responsibility of the licensees. The cleanup of the Title 1 sites has been split into two separate projects: the Surface Project, which deals with the mill buildings, tailings, and contaminated soils at the sites and VPs; and the Ground Water Project, which is limited to the contaminated ground water at the sites. This management action process (MAP) document discusses the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Surface Project only; a separate MAP document has been prepared for the UMTRA Ground Water Project.

NONE

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

75

RECON: a computer program for analyzing repository economics. Documentation and user's manual. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

From 1981 through 1984 the Pacific Northwest Laboratory has been developing a computer model named RECON to calculate repository costs from parametric data input. The objective of the program has been to develop the capability to evaluate the effect on costs of changes in repository design parameters and operating scenario assumptions. This report documents the development of the model through September of 1984. Included in the report are: (1) descriptions of model development and the underlying equations, assumptions and definitions; (2) descriptions of data input using either card images or an interactive data input program; and (3) detailed listings of the program and definitions of program variables. Cost estimates generated using the model have been verified against independent estimates and good agreement has been obtained. 2 refs.

Clark, L.L.; Schutz, M.E.; Luksic, A.T.

1985-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 10 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations § 5502.105 Agency procedures. (a) The designated agency ethics official or, with the concurrence of the designated agency ethics official, each of the separate agency components of HHS listed in § 5501.102(a) of this chapter may prescribe procedures for the submission and review of each report filed under this part. These procedures may provide for filing extensions, for good cause shown, totaling not more than 90 days. (b) For good cause, the designated agency ethics official may extend the reporting deadlines for reports required under this part during the initial implementation phase for any reporting requirement, without regard to the 90 day maximum specified in paragraph (a)

77

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21 Federal Register 21 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules republication, the NRC will not initiate a second comment period on this action in the event the direct final rule is withdrawn. A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if: (1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient to require a substantive response in a notice-and- comment process. For example, a substantive response is required when: (a) The comment causes the NRC staff to reevaluate (or reconsider) its position or conduct additional analysis;

78

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Federal Register 6 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Notices 33 TMCnet, Consumer Interface with the Smart Grid, http://sip-trunking.tmcnet.com/news/2010/ 02/09/4613238.htm (last visited Apr. 27, 2010) existing implementations of these requirements. List of Questions for Commenters The following list of questions represents a preliminary attempt to identify and respond to the issues that have been raised in a variety of public and private forums, including but limited to: DOE's historic investment in Smart Grid technology through the Smart Grid Investment Grants and the Smart Grid Demonstrations projects; Smart Grid Forum blog initiated by the Office of Science and Technology policy titled ''Consumer Interface with the Smart Grid 33 ''; and the National

79

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Department of Energy § 782.5 PART 782-CLAIMS FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT Subpart A-General Sec. 782.1 Purpose. 782.2 Objectives. 782.3 Authority. Subpart B-Requirements and Procedures 782.5 Contents of communication initiating claim. 782.6 Processing of administrative claims. 782.7 Incomplete notice of infringement. 782.8 Indirect notice of infringement. AUTHORITY: Dept. of Energy Organization Act; sec. 651, 91 Stat. 601, 42 U.S.C. 7261; Atomic Energy Act of 1954; sec. 107(d), 88 Stat. 1241, 42 U.S.C. 5817(d); sec. 161(g), 80 Stat. 443, 42 U.S.C. 2201(g); sec. 172, 62 Stat. 933, 42 U.S.C. 2223; Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, sec. 2356, 75 Stat. 440, 22 U.S.C. 2356; Pat- ents, Invention Secrecy Act; sec. 183, 66 Stat. 4, 35 U.S.C. 183; Judiciary and Judical Proce-

80

Addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This document constitutes an addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 0), April 2011.

Patrick Matthews and Christy Sloop

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Document Control Template-Process  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1_ADocument Control Template - Process.doc Page 1 of 7 1_ADocument Control Template - Process.doc Page 1 of 7 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: Document Control Template - Process Document Number: F-001 Rev. A Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: P-001, Document Control Process Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): N/A F-001_ADocument Control Template - Process.doc Page 2 of 7 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release B C D E F-001_ADocument Control Template - Process.doc Page 3 of 7 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: DocTitle Document Number: P-DocID# Rev Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: David McKay Approver(s): Dennis Murphy Parent Document:

82

Documentation for initial testing and inspections of Beneficial Uses Shipping System (BUSS) Cask  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this report is to compile data generated during the initial tests and inspections of the Beneficial Uses Shipping System (BUSS) Cask. In addition, this report will verify that the testing criteria identified in section 8.1 of the BUSS Cask Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) was met. The BUSS Cask Model R-1 is a type B shipping container used for shipment of radioactive cesium-137 and strontium-90 capsules to Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF). The BUSS Cask body and lid are each one-piece forgings fabricated from ASTM A473, Type 304 stainless steel. The primary purpose of the BUSS Cask is to provide shielding and confinement as well as impact, puncture, and thermal protection for the capsules under both normal and accident conditions. Chapter 8 of the BUSS Cask SARP requires several acceptance tests and inspections, each intended to evaluate the performance of different components of the BUSS Cask system, to be performed before its first use. The results of the tests and inspections required are included in this document.

Lundeen, J.E.

1994-08-25T23:59:59.000Z

83

Addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 529: Area 25 Contaminated Materials, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This document constitutes an addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 529: Area 25 Contaminated Materials, Nevada Test Site, Nevada as described in the document Recommendations and Justifications To Remove Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order dated September 2013. The Use Restriction (UR) Removal document was approved by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection on October 16, 2013. The approval of the UR Removal document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR removals. In conformance with the UR Removal document, this addendum consists of: This page that refers the reader to the UR Removal document for additional information The cover, title, and signature pages of the UR Removal document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the UR Removal document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the UR for CAS 25-23-17, Contaminated Wash (Parcel H). This UR was established as part of FFACO corrective actions and was based on the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbon diesel-range organics contamination at concentrations greater than the NDEP action level at the time of the initial investigation.

Krauss, Mark J.

2013-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

Savannah River Site mixed waste Proposed Site Treatment Plan (PSTP). Volumes 1 and 2 and reference document: Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

The DOE is required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to prepare site treatment plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. This proposed plan contains Savannah River Site`s preferred options and schedules for constructing new facilities, and otherwise obtaining treatment for mixed wastes. The proposed plan consists of 2 volumes. Volume 1, Compliance Plan, identifies the capacity to be developed and the schedules as required. Volume 2, Background, provides a detailed discussion of the preferred options with technical basis, plus a description of the specific waste streams. Chapters are: Introduction; Methodology; Mixed low level waste streams; Mixed transuranic waste; High level waste; Future generation of mixed waste streams; Storage; Process for evaluation of disposal issues in support of the site treatment plans discussions; Treatment facilities and treatment technologies; Offsite waste streams for which SRS treatment is the Preferred Option (Naval reactor wastes); Summary information; and Acronyms and glossary. This revision does not contain the complete revised report, but only those pages that have been revised.

Helmich, E.; Noller, D.K.; Wierzbicki, K.S.; Bailey, L.L.

1995-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

85

Special initiatives FY 1996 multi-year program plan (MYPP) WBS 5.0. Revision 1  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Special Initiatives mission supports programmatic requests for service to DOE offices, other organizations and agencies. These requests can include the following: Supporting priority DOE initiatives, researching special programs, studying locating new activities ar the Hanford Site, producing specialty materials, providing consulting support to other sites, and managing a broad spectrum of US and international test programs. The Special Initiatives Program discussed in this plan consists of the following elements: space power programs, advanced programs, special programs, and program strategy.

Howald, S.C.

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

86

Document Control Template-Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 Publication Review and Approval 11_0608.doc608 Page 1 of 3 4 Publication Review and Approval 11_0608.doc608 Page 1 of 3 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Publication Review and Approval Document Number: ITTF-014 Rev. 11_0608 Document Owner: Ben Aragon Backup Owner: Janet Lee Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: ITTP-015 Website Development Maintenance Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): N/A ITTF-014 Publication Review and Approval 11_0608.doc608 Page 2 of 3 Revision History: Rev. Description of Changes A Initial Release 08_0523 Added review section for QA. Added "Approved w/changes" section. Changed "Corrections" and "Reason" to "Recommendations". Adjusted spacing on document. 08_1105 Added review section for Project Manager. Adjusted spacing on document.

87

Document Control Template-Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 Key Check-Out Form 10_0823 Page 1 of 3 2 Key Check-Out Form 10_0823 Page 1 of 3 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Key Check-Out Form Document Number: MGTF-012 Rev. 10_0823 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: MGTP-003, Control of Customer Property Notify of Changes: MGT, ADM Referenced Document(s): N/A MGTF-012 Key Check-Out Form 10_0823 Page 2 of 3 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change 10_0823 Initial Release MGTF-012 Key Check-Out Form 10_0823 NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Emergency Operations Training Academy Key Check-Out Form Name: Initial Suite Key: Date returned: Furniture Key: Date returned: Building Key: Date returned: Other Key(s): Date returned:

88

Document Control Template-Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 Equipment Check-Out Form 08_0411 Page 1 of 3 7 Equipment Check-Out Form 08_0411 Page 1 of 3 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Equipment Check-Out Form Document Number: MGTF-007 Rev. 08_0411 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: MGTP-003, Control of Customer Property Notify of Changes: MGT, ADM Referenced Document(s): N/A MGTF-007 Equipment Check-Out Form 08_0411 Page 2 of 3 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 08_0411 Footer removed as document is for internal use only MGTF-007 Equipment Check-Out Form 08_0411 NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Emergency Operations Training Academy EQUIPMENT CHECK-OUT FORM Name: Date taken:

89

Document | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002) Microsoft Word - Graphics A-76 Post - MEO VV Review Report F.doc A-76 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS...

90

Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management System Requirements Document More Documents & Publications Transportation, Aging and Disposal Canister System Performance Specification: Revision 1 FY 2007 Total...

91

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes To Procedure 200.1-5 Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure Revised Version Issued as P 200.1-5B LM Procedure 200.1-5, Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure of 1/19/07, has undergone revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and updates to the attached Plan. Please replace LM Procedure 200.1-5A with LM Procedure 200.1-5B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents.

92

Document Control Template-Instruction_Screen Shot  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3_ADocument Control Template - Instruction_Screen Shot.doc_Screen ShotPage 1 of 6 3_ADocument Control Template - Instruction_Screen Shot.doc_Screen ShotPage 1 of 6 EOTA - Business Instruction Document Title: Document Control Template - Instruction-Screen Shot Document Number: F-003 Rev. A Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: P-001, Document Control Process Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): N/A F-003_ADocument Control Template - Instruction_Screen Shot.doc_Screen ShotPage 2 of 6 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release B C D E F-003_ADocument Control Template - Instruction_Screen Shot.doc_Screen ShotPage 3 of 6 EOTA - Business Instruction Document Title: DocTitle Document Number:

93

Corrective Action Decision Document, Area 15 Environmental Protection Agency Farm Laboratory Building, Corrective Action Unit No. 95, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report is the Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) for the Nevada Test Site (NTS) Area 15 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Farm, Laboratory Building (Corrective Action Unit [CAU] No. 95), at the Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada. The scope of this CADD is to identify and evaluate potential corrective action alternatives for the decommissioning and decontamination (D and D) of the Laboratory Building, which were selected based on the results of investigative activities. Based on this evaluation, a preferred corrective action alternative is recommended. Studies were conducted at the EPA Farm from 1963 to 1981 to determine the animal intake and retention of radionuclides. The main building, the Laboratory Building, has approximately 370 square meters (4,000 square feet) of operational space. Other CAUS at the EPA Farm facility that will be investigated and/or remediated through other environmental restoration subprojects are not included in this CADD, with the exception of housekeeping sites. Associated structures that do not require classification as CAUS are considered in the evaluation of corrective action alternatives for CAU 95.

NONE

1997-08-18T23:59:59.000Z

94

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0, Including Errata Sheet  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's corrective action alternative recommendation for each of the corrective action sites (CASs) within Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. An evaluation of analytical data from the corrective action investigation, review of current and future operations at each CAS, and a detailed comparative analysis of potential corrective action alternatives were used to determine the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. There are six CASs in CAU 204, which are all located between Areas 1, 2, 3, and 5 on the NTS. The No Further Action alternative was recommended for CASs 01-34-01, 02-34-01, 03-34-01, and 05-99-02; and a Closure in Place with Administrative Controls recommendation was the preferred corrective action for CASs 05-18-02 and 05-33-01. These alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated as well as applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the sites and will eliminate potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated media at CAU 204.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

95

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 528: Polychlorinated Biphenyls Contamination, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) identifies and rationalizes the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's selection of a recommended corrective action alternative appropriate to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 528: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Contamination, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in Area 25 of the NTS, CAU 528 consists of one Corrective Action Site (CAS): 25-27-03, Polychlorinated Biphenyls Surface Contamination. Corrective Action Unit 528 was created to address the presence of PCBs around the Test Cell C concrete pad. Corrective action investigation activities were performed from August 24, 2003, through January 8, 2004. The PCBs and total petroleum hydrocarbons-diesel range organics were identified as contaminants of concern in the surface and shallow subsurface soils in 12 areas (Areas 1 through 12) at CAS 25-27-03. Based on the review of existing data, future use, and current operations at the NTS, the following alternatives have been developed for consideration: Alternative 1 - No Further Action; Alternative 2 - Clean Closure; Alternative 3 - Closure in Place with Administrative Controls. The three corrective action alternatives were evaluated on their technical merits, focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, and safety. Alternative 3 is the preferred corrective action for CAS 25-27-03. The selected alternative was judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated for closure of the sites and additionally to minimize potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated media at CAU 528.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2004-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

96

CORRECTIVE ACTION DECISION DOCUMENT FOR THE AREA 3 LANDFILL COMPLEX, TONOPAH TEST RANGE, CAU 424, REVISION 0, MARCH 1998  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) has been prepared for the Area 3 Landfill Complex (Corrective Action Unit [CAU] 424) in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) of 1996. Corrective Action Unit 424 is located at the Tonopah Test Range (TTR) and is comprised of the following Corrective Action Sites (CASs), each an individual landfill located around and within the perimeter of the Area 3 Compound (DOE/NV, 1996a): (1) Landfill A3-1 is CAS No. 03-08-001-A301. (2) Landfill A3-2 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A302. (3) Landfill A3-3 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A303. (4) Landfill A3-4 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A304. (5) Landfill A3-5 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A305. (6) Landfill A3-6 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A306. (7) Landfill A3-7 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A307. (8) Landfill A3-8 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A308. The purpose of this CADD is to identify and provide a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for each CAS. The scope of this CADD consists of the following: (1) Develop corrective action objectives. (2) Identify corrective action alternative screening criteria. (3) Develop corrective action alternatives. (4) Perform detailed and comparative evaluations of the corrective action alternatives in relation to the corrective action objectives and screening criteria. (6) Recommend and justify a preferred corrective action alternative for each CAS. In June and July 1997, a corrective action investigation was performed as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) for CAU No. 424: Area 3 Landfill Complex, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1997). Details can be found in Appendix A of this document. The results indicated four groupings of site characteristics as shown in Table ES-1. Based on the potential exposure pathways, the following corrective action objectives have been identified for CAU No. 424: (1) Prevent or mitigate human exposure to subsurface soils containing waste. (2) Remediate the site per applicable state and federal regulations (NAC, 1996c). (3) Prevent adverse impacts to groundwater quality. Based on the review of existing data, future land use, and current operations at the TTR, the following alternatives were developed for consideration at the Area 3 Landfill Complex CAU: Alternative 1 - No Action; Alternative 2 - Administrative Closure; Alternative 3 - Partial Excavation, Backfill, and Recontouring The corrective action alternatives were evaluated based on four general corrective action standards and five remedy-selection decision factors. Based on the results of this evaluation, preferred alternatives were selected for each CAS as indicated in Table ES-2. The preferred corrective action alternatives were evaluated on their technical merits, focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, and safety. The alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. These alternatives meet all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the site and will reduce potential future exposure pathways to the contents of the landfills. During corrective action implementation, these alternatives will present minimal potential threat to site workers who come in contact with the waste. However, procedures will be developed and implemented to ensure worker health and safety.

DOE /NV

1998-03-03T23:59:59.000Z

97

Corrrective action decision document for the Cactus Spring Waste Trenches (Corrective Action Unit No. 426). Revision No. 1  

SciTech Connect

The Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) for the Cactus Spring Waste Trenches (Corrective Action Unit [CAU] No. 426) has been prepared for the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Nevada Environmental Restoration Project. This CADD has been developed to meet the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) of 1996, stated in Appendix VI, {open_quotes}Corrective Action Strategy{close_quotes} (FFACO, 1996). The Cactus Spring Waste Trenches Corrective Action Site (CAS) No. RG-08-001-RG-CS is included in CAU No. 426 (also referred to as the {open_quotes}trenches{close_quotes}); it has been identified as one of three potential locations for buried, radioactively contaminated materials from the Double Tracks Test. The trenches are located on the east flank of the Cactus Range in the eastern portion of the Cactus Spring Ranch at the Tonopah Test Range (TTR) in Nye County, Nevada, on the northern portion of Nellis Air Force Range. The TTR is approximately 225 kilometers (km) (140 miles [mi]) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada, by air and approximately 56 km (35 mi) southeast of Tonopah, Nevada, by road. The trenches were dug for the purpose of receiving waste generated during Operation Roller Coaster, primarily the Double Tracks Test. This test, conducted in 1963, involved the use of live animals to assess the biological hazards associated with non-nuclear detonation of plutonium-bearing devices (i.e., inhalation uptake of plutonium aerosol). The CAS consists of four trenches that received solid waste and had an overall impacted area of approximately 36 meters (m) (120 feet [ft]) long x 24 m (80 ft) wide x 3 to 4.5 m (10 to 15 ft) deep. The average depressions at the trenches are approximately 0.3 m (1 ft) below land surface.

NONE

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

98

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 560: Septic Systems, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit560 comprises seven corrective action sites (CASs): 03-51-01, Leach Pit 06-04-02, Septic Tank 06-05-03, Leach Pit 06-05-04, Leach Bed 06-59-03, Building CP-400 Septic System 06-59-04, Office Trailer Complex Sewage Pond 06-59-05, Control Point Septic System The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 560 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 7, 2008, through February 24, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit560: Septic Systems, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, and Record of Technical Change No.1. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: Determine whether contaminants of concern (COCs) are present. If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The CAU 560 dataset from the investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the dataset for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. The following contaminants were determined to be present at concentrations exceeding their corresponding FALs: No contamination exceeding the FALs was identified at CASs 03-51-01, 06-04-02, and06-59-04. The soil at the base of the leach pit chamber at CAS06-05-03 contains arsenic above the FAL of 23 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs) above the FAL of 0.74 mg/kg, confined vertically from a depth of approximately 5 to 20 feet (ft) below ground surface. The contamination is confined laterally to the walls of the leach pit chamber and leach rock. The contamination present at CAS 06-05-03 within the leach pit was not feasible to remove. The surface and subsurface soils within and surrounding the septic system at CAS 06-05-04 contained PCB concentrations above the FAL of 0.74 mg/kg. Thelateral and vertical extent of COCs was determined for this CAS. Contaminated soils were removed up to within 18 ft of the building. The remaining contamination is confined to subsurface soils adjacent to and beneath BuildingCP-162 and was not feasible to remove. The solid materials within the septic tank and soils immediately surrounding the inlet end of the tank at CAS 06-59-03 contained benzo(a)pyrene above the FAL of 0.21 mg/kg. The soils, tank contents, and tank were removed. Materials remaining at this CAS do not contain contamination exceeding FALs. The solids contained within the septic tank and inlet pipe at CAS 06-59-05 contained the following contaminants above their respective FALs: PCBs, arsenic, lead, benzo(a)pyrene, and pesticides. The tank and inlet pipe contents were removed. Materials remaining at this CAS do not contain contamination exceeding FALs. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) provides the following corrective action recommendations: No further action for CASs 03-51-01, 06-04-02, and 06-59-04, as no contaminants of potential concern were present that exceed FALs. Closure in place for CAS 06-05-03 under a corrective action with a use restriction (UR) for remaining PCB- and arsenic-impacted potential source material (PSM). The UR form and map have been filed in the NNSA/NSO Facility Information Management System, the FFACO database, and NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Closure in place for CAS 06-05-04 under a corrective action with a UR for remaining PCBs in soil adjacent to and beneath Building CP-162. The UR form and map have been filed in the NNSA/NSO Facility Information Management System, the FFACO database, and NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. No further action for CAS 06-59-0

Grant Evenson

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

CORRECTIVE ACTION DECISION DOCUMENT FOR AREA 9 UXO LANDFILL, TONOPAH TEST RNGE, CAU 453, REVISION 0, MARCH 1998  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) has been prepared for the Area 9 Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Landfill (Corrective Action Unit [CAU] 453) in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) of 1996. Corrective Action Unit 453 is located at the Tonopah Test Range (TTR), Nevada, and is comprised of three individual landfill cells located northwest of Area 9. The cells are listed as one Corrective Action Site (CAS) 09-55-001-0952. The landfill cells have been designated as: ? Cell A9-1 ? Cell A9-2 ? Cell A9-3 The purpose of this CADD is to identify and provide a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for CAU 453. The scope of this CADD consists of the following tasks: ? Develop corrective action objectives. ? Identify corrective action alternative screening criteria. ? Develop corrective action alternatives. ? Perform detailed and comparative evaluations of the corrective action alternatives in relation to the corrective action objectives and screening criteria. ? Recommend and justify a preferred corrective action alternative for the CAU. In June and July 1997, a corrective action investigation was performed that consisted of activities set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) (DOE/NV, 1997). Subsurface investigation of the soils surrounding the cells revealed no contaminants of concern (COCs) above preliminary action levels. The cell contents were not investigated due to the potential for live UXO. Details concerning the analytical and investigation results can be found in Appendix A of this CADD. Based on the potential exposure pathways, the following corrective action objectives have been identified for CAU 453: ? Prevent or mitigate human exposure to subsurface soils containing COCs, solid waste, and/or UXO. ? Prevent adverse impacts to groundwater quality. Based on the review of existing data, future land use, and current operations at the TTR, the following alternatives have been developed for consideration at the Area 9 UXO Landfill CAU: ? Alternative 1 - No Further Action ? Alternative 2 - Closure in Place by Administrative Controls ? Alternative 3 - Closure in Place by Capping ? Alternative 4 - Clean Closure by Removal The corrective action alternatives were evaluated based on four general corrective action standards and five remedy selection decision factors. Based on the results of this evaluation, Alternative 2, Closure in Place by Administrative Controls, was selected as the preferred corrective action alternative. The preferred corrective action alternative was evaluated on its technical merits, focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, and safety. The alternative was judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated and to represent the most cost-effective corrective action. The alternative meets all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the site and will reduce potential future exposure pathways to the contents of the landfill. During corrective action implementation, this alternative will present minimal potential threat to site workers. However, appropriate health and safety procedures will be developed and implemented.

none

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 562: Waste Systems Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) presents information supporting the selection of corrective action alternatives (CAAs) leading to the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 562, Waste Systems, in Areas 2, 23, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, Nevada. This complies with the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management. Corrective Action Unit 562 comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): 02-26-11, Lead Shot 02-44-02, Paint Spills and French Drain 02-59-01, Septic System 02-60-01, Concrete Drain 02-60-02, French Drain 02-60-03, Steam Cleaning Drain 02-60-04, French Drain 02-60-05, French Drain 02-60-06, French Drain 02-60-07, French Drain 23-60-01, Mud Trap Drain and Outfall 23-99-06, Grease Trap 25-60-04, Building 3123 Outfalls The purpose of this CADD is to identify and provide the rationale for the recommendation of CAAs for the 13 CASs within CAU 562. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from July 27, 2009, through May 12, 2010, as set forth in the CAU 562 Corrective Action Investigation Plan. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: Determine whether COCs are present. If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. A data quality assessment (DQA) performed on the CAU 562 data demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the data for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against appropriate final action levels (FALs) to identify the COCs for each CAS. The results of the CAI identified COCs at 10 of the 13 CASs in CAU 562, and thus corrective action is required. Assessment of the data generated from investigation activities conducted at CAU 562 is shown in Table ES-1. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, review of future and current operations at the 13 CASs, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, the following corrective actions are recommended for CAU 562. No further action is the preferred corrective action for CASs 02-60-01, 02-60-06, and 02-60-07. Clean closure is the preferred corrective action for CASs 02-26-11, 02-44-02, 02-59-01, 02-60-02, 02-60-03, 02-60-04, 02-60-05, 23-60-01, 23-99-06, and 25-60-04. The preferred CAAs were evaluated on technical merit focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, safety, and cost. The alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. The alternatives meet all applicable federal and state regulations for closure of the site and will reduce potential exposures to contaminated media to acceptable levels. The DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office provides the following recommendations: No further corrective action is required at CASs 02-60-01, 02-60-06, and 02-60-07. Clean closure is recommended for the remaining 10 CASs in CAU 562. A Corrective Action Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection that contains a detailed description of the proposed actions that will be taken to implement the selected corrective actions.

Mark Krause

2010-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Phase II Documentation Overview of Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) initiated the Underground Test Area (UGTA) Subproject to assess and evaluate radiologic groundwater contamination resulting from underground nuclear testing at the NTS. These activities are overseen by the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) (1996, as amended March 2010). For Frenchman Flat, the UGTA Subproject addresses media contaminated by the underground nuclear tests, which is limited to geologic formations within the saturated zone or 100 meters (m) or less above the water table. Transport in groundwater is judged to be the primary mechanism of migration for the subsurface contamination away from the Frenchman Flat underground nuclear tests. The intent of the UGTA Subproject is to assess the risk to the public from the groundwater contamination produced as a result of nuclear testing. The primary method used to assess this risk is the development of models of flow and contaminant transport to forecast the extent of potentially contaminated groundwater for the next 1,000 years, establish restrictions to groundwater usage, and implement a monitoring program to verify protectiveness. For the UGTA Subproject, contaminated groundwater is that which exceeds the radiological standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (CFR, 2009) the State of Nevadas groundwater quality standard to protect human health and the environment. Contaminant forecasts are expected to be uncertain, and groundwater monitoring will be used in combination with land-use control to build confidence in model results and reduce risk to the public. Modeling forecasts of contaminant transport will provide the basis for negotiating a compliance boundary for the Frenchman Flat Corrective Action Unit (CAU). This compliance boundary represents a regulatory-based distinction between groundwater contaminated or not contaminated by underground testing. Transport modeling simulations are used to compute radionuclide concentrations in time and space within the CAU for the 1,000-year contaminant boundary. These three-dimensional (3-D) concentration simulations are integrated into probabilistic forecasts of the likelihood of groundwater exceeding or remaining below the radiological standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (CFR, 2009) defined as the contaminant boundary. Contaminant boundaries are not discrete predictions of the location or concentration of contaminants, but instead are spatial representations of the probability of exceeding Safe Drinking Water Act radiological standards. The forecasts provide planning tools to facilitate regulatory decisions designed to protect the health and safety of the public.

Greg Ruskauff

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

102

APPENDIX D. REVISED PROJECT DOCUMENTATION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of an algal based green oil (green oil) from lignocellulosic (wood) extract. The green oil would be sold to an offsite refinery for processing into a bio-based fuel. We are...

103

Document Control Process  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 Document Control Process 11_0304 Page 1 of 7 1 Document Control Process 11_0304 Page 1 of 7 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: Document Control Process Document Number: P-001 Rev 11_0304 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: Q-001, Quality Manual Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): F-001 Document Control Template - Process, F-002 Document Control Template - Instruction, F-003 Document Control Template - Screenshot, F-004 Document Control Template - Form, F-005 Document Control Template - Form - Excel, MGTP-002 Skill Set Model, Q-003 EOTA Processes: Sequence and Interaction, P-003, Control of Records P-001 Document Control Process 11_0304 Page 2 of 7 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change

104

EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Nonconformance Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 Nonconformance Report 07_1206.doc 07_1206 Page 1 of 3 5 Nonconformance Report 07_1206.doc 07_1206 Page 1 of 3 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Nonconformance Report Document Number: F-015 Rev. 07_12-06 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: P-011, Nonconforming Material / Product Process Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): N/A F-015 Nonconformance Report 07_1206.doc 07_1206 Page 2 of 3 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 07_1206 Converted form F-015 to a Word Form. Changed layout of form. No content changes were done. C D E F-015 Nonconformance Report 07_1206.doc 07_1206 Page 1 of 1 Nonconformance Report (NCR) General Information NCR # -

105

Overview Documents: Document 0703019  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sites Feedback Overview Documents Page 19 Next - - - > < - Previous U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Minutes of Commissioners' Executive Session 74 - 29 May 13, 1974 Document...

106

Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This CADD/CAP follows the Corrective Action Investigation (CAI) stage, which results in development of a set of contaminant boundary forecasts produced from groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling of the Frenchman Flat CAU. The Frenchman Flat CAU is located in the southeastern portion of the NNSS and comprises 10 underground nuclear tests. The tests were conducted between 1965 and 1971 and resulted in the release of radionuclides in the subsurface in the vicinity of the test cavities. Two important aspects of the corrective action process are presented within this CADD/CAP. The CADD portion describes the results of the Frenchman Flat CAU data-collection and modeling activities completed during the CAI stage. The corrective action objectives and the actions recommended to meet the objectives are also described. The CAP portion describes the corrective action implementation plan. The CAP begins with the presentation of CAU regulatory boundary objectives and initial use restriction boundaries that are identified and negotiated by NNSA/NSO and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP). The CAP also presents the model evaluation process designed to build confidence that the flow and contaminant transport modeling results can be used for the regulatory decisions required for CAU closure. The first two stages of the strategy have been completed for the Frenchman Flat CAU. A value of information analysis and a CAIP were developed during the CAIP stage. During the CAI stage, a CAIP addendum was developed, and the activities proposed in the CAIP and addendum were completed. These activities included hydrogeologic investigation of the underground testing areas, aquifer testing, isotopic and geochemistry-based investigations, and integrated geophysical investigations. After these investigations, a groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was developed to forecast contaminant boundaries that enclose areas potentially exceeding the Safe Drinking Water Act radiological standards at any time within 1,000 years. An external peer review of the groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was completed, and the model was accepted by NDEP to allow advancement to the CADD/CAP stage. The CADD/CAP stage focuses on model evaluation to ensure that existing models provide adequate guidance for the regulatory decisions regarding monitoring and institutional controls. Data-collection activities are identified and implemented to address key uncertainties in the flow and contaminant transport models. During the CR stage, final use restriction boundaries and CAU regulatory boundaries are negotiated and established; a long-term closure monitoring program is developed and implemented; and the approaches and policies for institutional controls are initiated. The model evaluation process described in this plan consists of an iterative series of five steps designed to build confidence in the site conceptual model and model forecasts. These steps are designed to identify data-collection activities (Step 1), document the data-collection activities in the 0CADD/CAP (Step 2), and perform the activities (Step 3). The new data are then assessed; the model is refined, if necessary; the modeling results are evaluated; and a model evaluation report is prepared (Step 4). The assessments are made by the modeling team and presented to the pre-emptive review committee. The decision is made by the modeling team with the assistance of the pre-emptive review committee and concurrence of NNSA/NSO to continue data and model assessment/refinement, recommend additional data collection, or recommend advancing to the CR stage. A recommendation to advance to the CR stage is based on whether the model is considered to be sufficiently reliable for designing a monitoring system and developing effective institutional controls. The decision to advance to the CR stage or to return to step 1 of the process is then made by NDEP (Step 5).

Irene Farnham and Sam Marutzky

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 370: T-4 Atmospheric Test Site, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 370, T-4 Atmospheric Test Site, located in Area 4 at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 370 is comprised of Corrective Action Site (CAS) 04-23-01, Atmospheric Test Site T-4. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 370 due to the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from June 25, 2008, through April 2, 2009, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 370: T-4 Atmospheric Test Site and Record of Technical Change No. 1.

Patrick Matthews

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. This complies with the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management. The purpose of the CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed.

Matthews, Patrick

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 137: Waste Disposal Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 0) with ROTC 1 and 2  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 137 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from February 28 through August 17, 2006, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 137: Waste Disposal Sites. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective process: Determine whether contaminants of concern (COCs) are present. If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. ROTC-1: Downgrade FFACO UR at CAU 137, CAS 07-23-02, Radioactive Waste Disposal Site to an Administrative UR. ROTC-2: Downgrade FFACO UR at CAU 137, CAS 01-08-01, Waste Disposal Site to an Administrative UR.

Krauss, Mark J

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 557: Spills and Tank Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 557, Spills and Tank Sites, in Areas 1, 3, 6, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 557 comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): 01-25-02, Fuel Spill 03-02-02, Area 3 Subdock UST 06-99-10, Tar Spills 25-25-18, Train Maintenance Bldg 3901 Spill Site The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to identify and provide the justification and documentation that supports the recommendation for closure of the CAU 557 CASs with no further corrective action. To achieve this, a corrective action investigation (CAI) was conducted from May 5 through November 24, 2008. The CAI activities were performed as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 557: Spills and Tank Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada.

Alfred Wickline

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Overview Documents: Document 0706963  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Related Sites Feedback Overview Documents Page 143 Next - - - > < - Previous Atomic Energy Commission Plan for Expansion of Research in Biology and Medicine. Note by the...

112

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 234: Mud Pits, Cellars, and Mud Spills Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 234, Mud Pits, Cellars, and Mud Spills, located in Areas 2, 3, 4, 12, and 15 at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO,1996; as amended February 2008). Corrective Action Unit 234 is comprised of the following 12 corrective action sites: 02-09-48, Area 2 Mud Plant #1 02-09-49, Area 2 Mud Plant #2 02-99-05, Mud Spill 03-09-02, Mud Dump Trenches 04-44-02, Mud Spill 04-99-02, Mud Spill 12-09-01, Mud Pit 12-09-04, Mud Pit 12-09-08, Mud Pit 12-30-14, Cellar 12-99-07, Mud Dump 15-09-01, Mud Pit The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 234 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 234: Mud Pits, Cellars, and Mud Spills (NNSA/NSO, 2007). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: Determine whether contaminants of concern are present. If contaminants of concern are present, determine their extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The CAU 234 dataset from the investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the dataset for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs.

Grant Evenson

2008-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 371: Johnnie Boy Crater and Pin Stripe Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit 371, Johnnie Boy Crater and Pin Stripe, located within Areas 11 and 18 at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 371 comprises two corrective action sites (CASs): 11-23-05, Pin Stripe Contamination Area 18-45-01, U-18j-2 Crater (Johnnie Boy) The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 371 based on the implementation of corrective actions. The corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls was implemented at both CASs. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from January 8, 2009, through February 16, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 371: Johnnie Boy Crater and Pin Stripe. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 371 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. Radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were not found to be present in the surface soil. However, it was assumed that radionuclides are present in subsurface media within the Johnnie Boy crater and the fissure at Pin Stripe. Due to the assumption of radiological dose exceeding the FAL, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each site. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 371. A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 371. Corrective Action Unit 371 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 546: Injection Well and Surface Releases Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit 546, Injection Well and Surface Releases, at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO, 1996; as amended February 2008). Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 546 is comprised of two corrective action sites (CASs): 06-23-02, U-6a/Russet Testing Area 09-20-01, Injection Well The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 546. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from May 5 through May 28, 2008, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 546: Injection Well and Surface Releases, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (NNSA/NSO, 2008). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: Determine whether a contaminant of concern is present at a given CAS. Determine whether sufficient information is available to evaluate potential corrective action alternatives at each CAS. The CAU 546 dataset from the investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the dataset for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Because DQO data needs were met, and corrective actions have been implemented, it has been determined that no further corrective action (based on risk to human receptors) is necessary for the CAU 546 CASs. The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are needed for CAU 546 CASs. No Corrective Action Plan is required. A Notice of Completion to the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 546. Corrective Action Unit 546 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels established in this document. No analytes were detected at concentrations exceeding final action levels. However, contaminants of concern were presumed to be present in the subsurface soil at CAS 09-20-01. Therefore, the corrective action of close in place was selected as the preferred alternative for this CAS. Potential source material was removed from CAS 06-23-02; therefore, the corrective action of clean closure was selected as the preferred alternative at this CAS.

Alfred Wickline

2008-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit 365 comprises one corrective action site (CAS), CAS 08-23-02, U-8d Contamination Area. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 365 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with a use restriction (UR). Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from January 18, 2011, through August 2, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 365 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in supporting the DQO decisions. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present to the southwest of the Baneberry crater. It was also assumed that radionuclide levels present within the crater and fissure exceed the FAL. Corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of establishing a UR and posting warning signs for the crater, fissure, and the area located to the southwest of the crater where soil concentrations exceeded the FAL. These URs were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions beyond what are described in this document are necessary for CAU 365. (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 365. (3) Corrective Action Unit 365 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 410: Waste Disposal Trenches, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada: Revision No. 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report (CADD/CR) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 410: Waste Disposal Trenches, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 410 consists of five Corrective Action Sites (CASs): TA-21-003-TANL; 09-21-001-TA09; TA-19-002-TAB2; TA-21-002-TAAL; and 03-19-001. The CADD and CR have been combined into one report because no further action is recommended for this CAU. The corrective action alternative recommended for CAU 410 is Clean Closure; therefore, no corrective action or corrective action plan is required. No use restrictions are required to be placed on this CAU because the investigation showed no evidence of remaining soil contamination or remaining debris/waste upon completion of all investigation activities.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

117

CORRRECTIVE ACTION DECISION DOCUMENT FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNIT 427: AREA 3 SEPTIC WASTE SYSTEMS 2 AND 6, TONOPAH TEST RANGE, NEVADA, REVISION 0, JUNE 1998  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document has been prepared for the Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 2 and 6 (Corrective Action Unit 427) in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order of 1996 (FFACO, 1996). Corrective Action Unit 427 is located at the Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, and is comprised of the following Corrective Action Sites, each an individual septic waste system (DOE/NV, 1996a): (1) Septic Waste System 2 is Corrective Action Site Number 03-05-002-SW02. (2) Septic Waste System 6 is Corrective Action Site Number 03-05-002-SW06. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for each Corrective Action Site. The scope of this Correction Action Decision Document consists of the following tasks: (1) Develop corrective action objectives. (2) Identify corrective action alternative screening criteria. (3) Develop corrective action alternatives. (4) Perform detailed and comparative evaluations of the corrective action alternatives in relation to the corrective action objectives and screening criteria. (5) Recommend and justify a preferred corrective action alternative for each CAS. From November 1997 through January 1998, a corrective action investigation was performed as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit No. 427: Area 3 Septic Waste System Numbers 2 and 6, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1997b). Details can be found in Appendix A of this document. The results indicated that contamination is present in some portions of the CAU and not in others as described in Table ES-1 and shown in Figure A.2-2 of Appendix A. Based on the potential exposure pathways, the following corrective action objectives have been identified for Corrective Action Unit 427: (1) Prevent or mitigate human exposure to subsurface soils containing TPH at concentrations greater than 100 milligrams per kilogram (NAC, 1996b). (2) Close Sep tic Tank 33-5 in accordance with Nevada Administrative Code 459 (NAC, 1996c). (3) Prevent adverse impacts to groundwater quality. Based on the review of existing data, future land use, and current operations at the Tonopah Test Range, the following alternatives were developed for consideration at the Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 2 and 6: Alternative 1 - No Further Action; Alternative 2 - Closure of Septic Tank 33-5 and Administrative Controls; Alternative 3 - Closure of Septic Tank 33-5, Excavation, and Disposal The corrective action alternatives were evaluated based on four general corrective action standards and five remedy selection decision factors. Based on the results of this evaluation, the preferred alternative for Corrective Action Unit 427 is Alternative 2, Closure of Septic Tank 33-5 and Administrative Controls. The preferred corrective action alternative was evaluated on technical merit, focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, and safety. The alternative was judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. The alternative meets all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the site and will reduce potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated soils. During corrective action implementation, this alternative will present minimal potential threat to site workers who come in contact with the waste. However, procedures will be developed and implemented to ensure worker health and safety.

DOE /NV

1998-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

118

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 374: Area 20 Schooner Unit Crater, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 374 comprises five corrective action sites (CASs): 18-22-05, Drum 18-22-06, Drums (20) 18-22-08, Drum 18-23-01, Danny Boy Contamination Area 20-45-03, U-20u Crater (Schooner) The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 374 based on the implementation of corrective actions. The corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls was implemented at CASs 18-23-01 and 20-45-03, and a corrective action of removing potential source material (PSM) was conducted at CAS 20-45-03. The other CASs require no further action; however, best management practices of removing PSM and drums at CAS 18-22-06, and removing drums at CAS 18-22-08 were performed. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from May 4 through October 6, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 374: Area 20 Schooner Unit Crater, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigating the primary release of radionuclides and investigating other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 374 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. Radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were found to be present in the surface soil that was sampled. It is assumed that radionuclide levels present in subsurface media within the craters and ejecta fields (default contamination boundaries) at the Danny Boy and Schooner sites exceed the FAL. It is also assumed that PSM in the form of lead-acid batteries at Schooner exceeds the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of removing PSM, where present, and implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at the Danny Boy and Schooner sites. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 374. A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 374. Corrective Action Unit 374 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 367 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): 10-09-03, Mud Pit 10-45-01, U-10h Crater (Sedan) 10-45-02, Ess Crater Site 10-45-03, Uncle Crater Site The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation of the corrective actions and site closure activities implemented at CAU 367. A corrective action of closure in place with use restrictions was completed at each of the three crater CASs (10-45-01, 10-45-02, and 10-45-03); corrective actions were not required at CAS 10-09-03. In addition, a limited soil removal corrective action was conducted at the location of a potential source material release. Based on completion of these correction actions, no additional corrective action is required at CAU 367, and site closure is considered complete. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from February 2010 through March 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of non-test or other releases (e.g., migration in washes and potential source material). Based on the proximity of the Uncle, Ess, and Sedan craters, the impact of the Sedan test on the fallout deposited from the two earlier tests, and aerial radiological surveys, the CAU 367 investigation was designed to study the releases from the three crater CASs as one combined release (primary release). Corrective Action Site 10-09-03, Mud Pit, consists of two mud pits identified at CAU 367. The mud pits are considered non-test releases or other releases and were investigated independent of the three crater CASs. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 367 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. For the primary release, radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were not found to be present in the surface or shallow subsurface soil outside the default contamination boundary. However, it was assumed that radionuclides are present in subsurface media within each of the three craters (Sedan, Ess, and Uncle) due to prompt injection of radionuclides from the tests. Based on the assumption of radiological dose exceeding the FAL, corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each crater CAS. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. With regard to other releases, no contaminants of concern were identified at the mud pits or any of the other release locations, with one exception. Potential source material in the form of lead was found at one location. A corrective action of clean closure was implemented at this location, and verification samples indicated that no further action is necessary. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 367. Corrective Action Unit 367 should be promoted from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD)/Closure Report (CR) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 372, Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, located within Areas 18 and 20 at the Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 372 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): 18-45-02, Little Feller I Surface Crater 18-45-03, Little Feller II Surface Crater 20-23-01, U-20k Contamination Area 20-45-01, U-20L Crater (Cabriolet) The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 372 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls at all CASs. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from November 9, 2009, through December 10, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 372 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL was established of 25 millirem per year based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present at all four CASs. It is assumed that radionuclide levels present within the Little Feller I and Cabriolet high contamination areas and within the craters at Palanquin and Cabriolet exceed the FAL. It is also assumed that potential source material in the form of lead bricks at Little Feller I and lead-acid batteries at Palanquin and Cabriolet exceed the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of removing potential source material, where present, and implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each CAS. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 372. A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 372. Corrective Action Unit 372 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Matthews, Patrick and Sloop, Christy

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 106: Area 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 106 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): (1) 05-20-02, Evaporation Pond; (2) 05-23-05, Atmospheric Test Site - Able; (3) 05-45-04, 306 GZ Rad Contaminated Area; (4) 05-45-05, 307 GZ Rad Contaminated Area. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 106 based on the implementation of corrective actions. The corrective action of clean closure was implemented at CASs 05-45-04 and 05-45-05, while no corrective action was necessary at CASs 05-20-02 and 05-23-05. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 20, 2010, through June 1, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 106: Areas 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of other releases (mechanical displacement and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 106 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Industrial Area exposure scenario (2,250 hours of annual exposure). The only radiological dose exceeding the FAL was at CAS 05-45-05 and was associated with potential source material (PSM). It is also assumed that additional PSM in the form of depleted uranium (DU) and DU-contaminated debris at CASs 05-45-04 and 05-45-05 exceed the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken at these CASs that consisted of removing PSM and collecting verification samples. Results of verification samples show that remaining soil does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 106. (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 106. (3) Corrective Action Unit 106 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews and Dawn Peterson

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

122

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0 with ROTC 1, 2, and Errata  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 204 Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE); and the U.S. Department of Defense (FFACO, 1996). The NTS is approximately 65 miles (mi) north of Las Vegas, Nevada (Figure 1-1). The Corrective Action Sites (CASs) within CAU 204 are located in Areas 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the NTS, in Nye County, Nevada (Figure 1-2). Corrective Action Unit 204 is comprised of the six CASs identified in Table 1-1. As shown in Table 1-1, the FFACO describes four of these CASs as bunkers one as chemical exchange storage and one as a blockhouse. Subsequent investigations have identified four of these structures as instrumentation bunkers (CASs 01-34-01, 02-34-01, 03-34-01, 05-33-01), one as an explosives storage bunker (CAS 05-99-02), and one as both (CAS 05-18-02). The six bunkers included in CAU 204 were primarily used to monitor atmospheric testing or store munitions. The ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) for Corrective Action Unit 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site, Nevada'' (NNSA/NV, 2002a) provides information relating to the history, planning, and scope of the investigation; therefore, it will not be repeated in this CADD. This CADD identifies potential corrective action alternatives and provides a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for each CAS within CAU 204. The evaluation of corrective action alternatives is based on process knowledge and the results of investigative activities conducted in accordance with the CAIP (NNSA/NV, 2002a) that was approved prior to the start of the Corrective Action Investigation (CAI). Record of Technical Change (ROTC) No. 1 to the CAIP (approval pending) documents changes to the preliminary action levels (PALs) agreed to by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) and DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO). This ROTC specifically discusses the radiological PALs and their application to the findings of the CAU 204 corrective action investigation.

Wickline, Alfred

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 140: Waste Dumps, Burn Pits, and Storage Area, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision No. 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies and rationalizes the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's selection of a recommended corrective action alternative appropriate to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 140: Waste Dumps, Burn Pits, and Storage Area, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in Areas 5, 22, and 23 of the NTS, CAU 140 consists of nine corrective action sites (CASs). Investigation activities were performed from November 13 through December 11, 2002, with additional sampling to delineate the extent of contaminants of concern (COCs) conducted on February 4 and March 18 and 19, 2003. Results obtained from the investigation activities and sampling indicated that only 3 of the 9 CASs at CAU 140 had COCs identified. Following a review of existing data, future land use, and current operations at the NTS, the following preferred alternatives were developed for consideration: (1) No Further Action - six CASs (05-08-02, 05-17-01, 05-19-01, 05-35-01, 05-99-04, and 22-99-04); (2) Clean Closure - one CAS (05-08-01), and (3) Closure-in-Place - two CASs (05-23-01 and 23-17-01). These alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. Additionally, the alternatives meet all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the site and will eliminate potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated media at CAU 140.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-10-17T23:59:59.000Z

124

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 5: Landfills, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision No. 0 (with Record of Technical Change No. 1)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies and rationalizes the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's selection of a recommended corrective action alternative (CAA) appropriate to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action (CAU) 5: Landfills, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in Areas 5, 6, 12, 20, and 23 of the NTS, CAU 5 is comprised of eight corrective action sites (CASs). The corrective action investigation (CAI) of CAU 5 was conducted from October 7, 2002 through January 30, 2003, with geophysical surveys completed from March 6 through May 8, 2002, and topographic surveys conducted from March 11 through April 29, 2003. Contaminants of concern (COCs) were identified only at CAS 12-15-01. Those COCs included total petroleum hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, review of future and current operations in Areas 5, 6, 12, 20, and 23 of the Nevada Test Site, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, the following single alternative was developed for consideration. Close in Place with Administrative Controls is the recommended alternative for all of the CASs in CAU 5. This alternative was judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. Additionally, the alternative meets all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the sites and will eliminate inadvertent intrusion into landfills at CAU 5.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-10-24T23:59:59.000Z

125

Tank Monitoring and Control System (TMACS) Version Description Document (VDD)  

SciTech Connect

This document updates the Version Description Document with the changes incorporated in the Revision 11.2 software installation on the Tank Monitor and Control System (TMACS).

BARNES, D.A.

2000-03-02T23:59:59.000Z

126

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 375: Area 30 Buggy Unit Craters, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 375 comprises three corrective action sites (CASs): (1) 25-23-22, Contaminated Soils Site; (2) 25-34-06, Test Cell A Bunker; and (3) 30-45-01, U-30a, b, c, d, e Craters. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 375 based on the implementation of corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls at CAS 25-23-22, no further action at CAS 25-34-06, and closure in place with administrative controls and removal of potential source material (PSM) at CAS 30-45-01. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from July 28, 2010, through April 4, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 375: Area 30 Buggy Unit Craters. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 375 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were assumed to be present within the default contamination boundaries at CASs 25-23-22 and 30-45-01. No contaminants were identified at CAS 25-34-06, and no corrective action is necessary. Potential source material in the form of lead plate, lead-acid batteries, and oil within an abandoned transformer were identified at CAS 30-45-01, and corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of removing the PSM. Use restrictions and warning signs were implemented for the remaining radiological contamination at CASs 25-23-22 and 30-45-01. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 375; (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 375; and (3) Move CAU 375 from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 545: Dumps, Waste Disposal Sites, and Buried Radioactive Materials Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD)/Closure Report (CR) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 545, Dumps, Waste Disposal Sites, and Buried Radioactive Materials, in Areas 2, 3, 9, and 20 of the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management (1996, as amended February 2008). Corrective Action Unit 545 is comprised of the following eight Corrective Action Sites (CASs): 02-09-01, Mud Disposal Area 03-08-03, Mud Disposal Site 03-17-01, Waste Consolidation Site 3B 03-23-02, Waste Disposal Site 03-23-05, Europium Disposal Site 03-99-14, Radioactive Material Disposal Area 09-23-02, U-9y Drilling Mud Disposal Crater 20-19-01, Waste Disposal Site While all eight CASs are addressed in this CADD/CR, sufficient information was available for the following three CASs; therefore, a field investigation was not conducted at these sites: For CAS 03-08-03, though the potential for subsidence of the craters was judged to be extremely unlikely, the data quality objective (DQO) meeting participants agreed that sufficient information existed about disposal and releases at the site and that a corrective action of close in place with a use restriction is recommended. Sampling in the craters was not considered necessary. For CAS 03-23-02, there were no potential releases of hazardous or radioactive contaminants identified. Therefore, the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for CAU 545 concluded that: Sufficient information exists to conclude that this CAS does not exist as originally identified. Therefore, there is no environmental concern associated with CAS 03-23-02. This CAS is closed with no further action. For CAS 03-23-05, existing information about the two buried sources and lead pig was considered to be sufficient, and safety concerns existed about the stability of the crater component. Therefore, a corrective action of close in place with a use restriction is recommended, and sampling at the site was not considered necessary. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation to support the recommendation for closure of CAU 545 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from August 20 through November 02, 2007, as set forth in the CAU 545 Corrective Action Investigation Plan. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the DQO process: Determine whether contaminants of concern (COCs) are present. If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The CAU 545 dataset from the investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the dataset for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels established in this CADD/CR. The results of the CAI identified no COCs at the five CASs investigated in CAU 545. As a best management practice, repair of the fence enclosing CAS 03-08-03 has been completed. Therefore, the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office provides the following recommendations: Close in place COCs at CASs 03-08-03 and 03-23-05 with use restrictions. No further corrective action for CAU 545. No Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Unit 545 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. A Notice of Completion to the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 545.

Alfred Wickline

2008-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 127: Areas 25 and 26 Storage Tanks, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies and rationalizes the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's selection of recommended corrective action alternatives (CAAs) appropriate to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 127: Areas 25 and 26 Storage Tanks, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 127 consists of twelve corrective action sites (CASs). Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from February 24, 2003, through May 2, 2003, with additional sampling conducted on June 6, 2003, June 9, 2003, and June 24, 2003. Analytes detected during these investigation activities were evaluated against preliminary action levels to identify contaminants of concern (COCs) for each CAS, resulting in the determination that only two of the CASs did not have COCs exceeding regulatory levels. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, review of future and current operations in Areas 25 and 26 of the Nevada Test Site, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, the following alternatives were developed for consideration: (1) No Further Action is the preferred corrective action for the two CASs (25-02-13, 26-02-01) identified with no COCs; (2) Clean Closure is the preferred corrective action for eight of the CASs (25-01-05, 25-23-11, 25-12-01, 25-01-06, 26-01-01, 26-01-02, 26-99-01, 26-23-01); and (3) Closure in Place is the preferred corrective action for the remaining two CASs (25-01-07, 25-02-02). These three alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. Additionally, these alternatives meet all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the sites at CAU 127 and will reduce potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated media.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-09-26T23:59:59.000Z

129

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 554: Area 23 Release Site Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit 554, Area 23 Release Site, located in Mercury at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (1996). Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 554 is comprised of one corrective action site (CAS): (1) CAS 23-02-08, USTs 23-115-1, 2, 3/Spill 530-90-002. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 554 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from January 18 through May 5, 2005, as set forth in the ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 554: Area 23 Release Site'' (NNSA/NSO, 2004) and Records of Technical Change No. 1 and No. 2. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: (1) Determine whether contaminants of concern are present. (2) If contaminants of concern are present, determine their nature and extent. (3) Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The CAU 554 dataset from the investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the dataset for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against preliminary action levels (PALs) established in the CAU 554 CAIP for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) benzo(a)pyrene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and trichloroethene (TCE). Specifically: (1) The soil beneath and laterally outward from former underground storage tanks at CAS 23-02-08 contains TPH-diesel-range organics (DRO) above the PAL of 100 milligrams per kilogram, confined vertically from a depth of approximately 400 feet (ft) below ground surface (bgs). The contamination is confined to 12.5 ft bgs to the subsurface media and laterally within approximately 100 ft of the release. (2) A single soil sample collected from the depth of 99 to 100 ft bgs demonstrated the presence of TCE at a concentration above the PAL. (3) Two soil samples collected from depths of 198 to 199 ft bgs and 380 to 382 ft bgs demonstrated the presence of benzo(a)pyrene at a concentration above the PAL. (4) Two soil samples collected from depths of 240 to 241 ft bgs and 290 to 291 ft bgs demonstrated the presence of dibenz(a,h)anthracene at a concentration above the PAL. Tier 2 final action levels (FALs) were then calculated for these contaminants. The Tier 2 FALs for TCE, benzo(a)pyrene, and dibenz(a,h)anthracene were calculated based on a limited exposure to subsurface contamination scenario, and the Tier 2 FAL for TPH-DRO was established as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goal values for the individual hazardous constituents of diesel. The evaluation of TPH-DRO, benzo(a)pyrene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and TCE based on the Tier 2 FALs determined that no FALs were exceeded. Therefore, the DQO data needs were met, and it was determined that no corrective action (based on risk to human receptors) is necessary for the site. As a best management practice for the remaining subsurface diesel contamination present at the site, a use restriction was imposed on future site activities that would not allow for future contact of the subsurface contamination. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective action for CAU 554. (2) No Corrective Action Plan. (3) A Notice of Completion to the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 554. (4) Corrective Action Unit 554 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order.

Evenson, Grant

2005-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 322: Areas 1 and 3 Release Sites and Injection Wells Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0 with ROTC 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 322, Areas 1 and 3 Release Sites and Injection Wells, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (1996). Corrective Action Unit 322 is comprised of the following corrective action sites (CASs): (1) 01-25-01 - AST Release Site; (2) 03-25-03 - Mud Plant and AST Diesel Release; and (3) 03-20-05 - Injection Wells and BOP Shop. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide the rationale for the recommendation of a corrective action alternative for each CAS within CAU 322. Corrective action investigation activities were performed from April 2004 through September 2004, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan. The purposes of the activities as defined during the data quality objectives process were: (1) Determine if contaminants of concern (COCs) are present; (2) If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent; and (3) Provide sufficient information and data to recommend appropriate corrective actions for the CASs. Analytes detected during the corrective action investigation were evaluated against appropriate preliminary action levels to identify contaminants of concern for each corrective action site. Radiological field measurements were compared to unrestricted release criteria. Assessment of the data generated from investigation activities revealed the following: (1) CAS 01-25-01 contains an AST berm contaminated with total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) diesel-range organics (DRO). (2) CAS 03-25-03 includes two distinct areas: Area A where no contamination remains from a potential spill associated with an AST, and Area B where TPH-DRO contamination associated with various activities at the mud plant was identified. The Area B contamination was found at various locations and depths. (3) CAS 03-25-03 Area B contains TPH-DRO contamination at various locations and depths in the area associated with the Mud Plant. (4) CAS 03-20-05 contains TPH-DRO, metals, and radiological contamination within the injection well casing soil and TPH-DRO contamination at the depth coincidental with the bottom of the injection well sump. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the corrective action investigation, review of future and current operations in Areas 1 and 3 of the Nevada Test Site, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential corrective action alternatives, the following corrective actions are recommended for the Corrective Action Unit 322 CASs. Closure in Place with Administrative Controls is the preferred corrective action for the following CASs: (1) CAS 01-25-01, removal of TPH-DRO contamination would pose a significant safety hazard due to the site location. (2) CAS 03-25-03 No contamination remains at Area A (AST Berm); and thus, no further action is the preferred alternative at this part of the CAS. However at Area B, TPH-DRO contamination is varied in concentration and location and the footprint of the CAS is large, removal of contaminated ''pockets'' would be laborious and cost prohibitive. The plutonium-239 surface contamination identified at CAS 03-25-03 Area B has been removed and drummed as a best management practice. (3) CAS 03-20-05, TPH-DRO, metals, and radiological contamination are present in the injection well casing soils. Recommend corrective action includes removal of the liquid in the injection well sump (approximately 3 feet (ft) of liquid at 60 ft below ground surface), grouting the sump, and the area within the injection well casing. The plutonium-239 surface contamination identified at CAS 03-20-05 has been removed and drummed as a best management practice and will be disposed of as low-level radioactive waste. It is recommended that the liquids be removed from the holding tank wells and the sumps of the two outer holding tanks within the BOP Shop, and the sumps be grouted, and the holding tanks filled in to the BOP Shop floor surface. The preferred corrective action alternatives were ev

Boehlecke, Robert

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

Documents: Transportation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Transportation PDF Icon Transportation Impact Assessment for Shipment of Uranium Hexafluoride (UF6) Cylinders...

132

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 561: Waste Disposal Areas, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

CAU 561 comprises 10 CASs: (1) 01-19-01, Waste Dump; (2) 02-08-02, Waste Dump and Burn Area; (3) 03-19-02, Debris Pile; (4) 05-62-01, Radioactive Gravel Pile; (5) 12-23-09, Radioactive Waste Dump; (6) 22-19-06, Buried Waste Disposal Site; (7) 23-21-04, Waste Disposal Trenches ; (8) 25-08-02, Waste Dump; (9) 25-23-21, Radioactive Waste Dump; and (10) 25-25-19, Hydrocarbon Stains and Trench. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 561 with no further corrective action. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the DQO process: (1) Determine whether COCs are present; (2) If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent; and (3) Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The following contaminants were determined to be present at concentrations exceeding their corresponding FALs: (1) No contamination exceeding FALs was identified at CASs 01-19-01, 03-19-02, 05-62-01, 12-23-09, and 22-19-06. (2) The surface and subsurface soil within the burn area at CAS 02-08-02 contains arsenic and lead above the FALs of 23 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and 800 mg/kg, respectively. The surface and subsurface soil within the burn area also contains melted lead slag (potential source material [PSM]). The soil within the waste piles contains polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) above the FALs. The contamination within the burn area is spread throughout the area, as it was not feasible to remove all the PSM (melted lead), while at the waste piles, the contamination is confined to the piles. (3) The surface and subsurface soils within Trenches 3 and 5 at CAS 23-21-04 contain arsenic and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) above the FALs of 23 mg/kg and 0.74 mg/kg, respectively. The soil was removed from both trenches, and the soil that remains at this CAS does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Lead bricks and counterweights were also removed, and the soil below these items does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. (4) The concrete-like material at CAS 25-08-02 contains arsenic above the FAL of 23 mg/kg. This concrete-like material was removed, and the soil that remains at this CAS does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Lead-acid batteries were also removed, and the soil below the batteries does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. (5) The surface soils within the main waste dump at the posted southern radioactive material area (RMA) at CAS 25-23-21 contain cesium (Cs)-137 and PCBs above the FALs of 72.9 picocuries per gram (pCi/g) and 0.74 mg/kg, respectively. The soil was removed from the RMA, and the soil that remains at this CAS does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. (6) The surface and subsurface soils at CAS 25-25-19 do not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. In addition, lead bricks were removed, and the soil below these items does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. The following best management practices were implemented: (1) Housekeeping debris at CASs 02-08-02, 23-21-04, 25-08-02, 25-23-21, and 25-25-19 was removed and disposed of; (2) The open trenches at CAS 23-21-04 were backfilled; (3) The waste piles at CAS 25-08-02 were removed and the area leveled to ground surface; and (4) The remaining waste piles at the main waste dump at CAS 25-23-21 were leveled to ground surface. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further action for CASs 01-19-01, 03-19-02, 05-62-01, 12-23-09, and 22-19-06; (2) Closure in place with an FFACO use restriction (UR) at CAS 02-08-02 for the remaining PAH-, arsenic-, and lead-contaminated soil, and the melted lead PSM. The UR form and map have been filed in the NNSA/NSO Facility Information Management System, the FFACO database, and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files; (3) No further corrective action at CAS 23-21-04, as the lead bricks and counterweights (PSM) have been removed, and the COCs of arsenic and PCBs in soil have be

Mark Krauss

2011-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

Related Documents  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Subject: ESP-SCSI for Parameter Data This proposal defines a mechanism for applying SA parameter data to descriptors that are transferred in data-in buffer and/or data-out buffer parameter data. Revision History r0 r1 Original revision Revise based on comments from April CAP Security WG, Matt Ball, and Paul Entzel Also increased the sequence count fields to 8 bytes (64 bits) and updated for combined encryption/integrity modes

From Ralph; O. Weber

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

134

Documents: Other  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Other PDF Icon Investigation of the Chemical Reactivity of Phosgene in Uranium Hexafluoride 2.6 MB details PDF...

135

Great Lakes water quality initiative criteria documents for the protection of wildlife (proposed): DDT, mercury 2,3,7,8-TCDD and PCBs  

SciTech Connect

The document outlines, for each category of contaminant listed in the title, the relevant literature, the calculation of mammalian wildlife value, the calculation of Avian Wildlife Value, and the Great Lakes Wildlife criterion.

Bradbury, S.; Nolt, C.; Goodman, B.; Stromborg, K.; Sullivan, J.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

136

Document Number  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

I am enclosing a copy of the revised decommissioning plan for the University of Illinois Advanced TRIGA reactor facility. The revised plan is submitted in its entirety. I am also enclosing the Final Status Survey plan per our discussion. If there are any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 20, 2007. Sincerely,

Reactor Adminsdtrator; Richard L. Holm; Tom Mclaughlin; Richard L. Holmn; Revised R. Holm; Kevin E. Taylor; Lee G. Penney

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

Preliminary hazards analysis of thermal scrap stabilization system. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This preliminary analysis examined the HA-21I glovebox and its supporting systems for potential process hazards. Upon further analysis, the thermal stabilization system has been installed in gloveboxes HC-21A and HC-21C. The use of HC-21C and HC-21A simplified the initial safety analysis. In addition, these gloveboxes were cleaner and required less modification for operation than glovebox HA-21I. While this document refers to glovebox HA-21I for the hazards analysis performed, glovebox HC-21C is sufficiently similar that the following analysis is also valid for HC-21C. This hazards analysis document is being re-released as revision 1 to include the updated flowsheet document (Appendix C) and the updated design basis (Appendix D). The revised Process Flow Schematic has also been included (Appendix E). This Current revision incorporates the recommendations provided from the original hazards analysis as well. The System Design Description (SDD) has also been appended (Appendix H) to document the bases for Safety Classification of thermal stabilization equipment.

Lewis, W.S.

1994-08-23T23:59:59.000Z

138

Microsoft Word - NDA Box PDP Plan-Revision 4-final  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Characterization Program Revision 4 May 2013 This document supersedes Revision 3 of DOECBFO-01-1006 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Office of the National TRU...

139

WIPP Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

a large file size. Environmental Monitoring Documents about environmental monitoring at WIPP, including annual site environmental reports Environmental Protection Agency...

140

Dataplot Documentation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Linear Fitting, Data Analysis, and Mathematics", Proceedings of the ... the printed tutorial documentation does not describe ... Filliben, James J. (1981). ...

2013-11-27T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

REVISION POLICY  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

REVISION POLICY REVISION POLICY March 2007 Data are collected at the million cubic feet per month level and all calculations mentioned below are carried out at that precision. However, the data published in the Form EIA-914 Monthly Gas Production Report are rounded to the nearest 0.01 billion cubic feet per day (roughly 300 million cubic feet per month). Monthly estimates of gross production published in the Natural Gas Monthly at the national level are rounded to billion cubic feet and those for marketed production at the State level are rounded to million cubic feet. The prior month's production estimate will always be revised each month, when the production estimate for the latest data month is released. For example, a June estimate would be revised when a July estimate is released.

142

Required Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Required Documents Required Documents Required Documents All foreign nationals, including students and postdocs, must select the foreign nationals employment category to complete the new-hire process. Contact (505) 665-7158 Email Complete following forms before New-Hire Orientation Be sure to bring the forms with you for the orientation event, but do not sign and date: Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification (pdf) - original, unexpired documents for verification of employment eligibility. Please refer to the I-9 verification form titled, "Lists of Acceptable Documents", which was included with your offer letter. (Laminated documents or hospital/temporary birth certificates are not accepted.) Note: Failure to provide required documents will result in delay and/or

143

Guidelines for PWR Steam Generator Tubing Specifications and Repair: Volume 2, Revision 1: Guidelines for Procurement of Alloy 690 S team Generator Tubing  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This revised document provides guidelines for procuring Alloy 690 steam generator tubing and sleeve material.

1999-04-14T23:59:59.000Z

144

TAO: Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Home Download Documentation Users Manual and Manual pages Example Programs Installation Changes Publications Referencing TAO Impact Who We Are Acknowledgements License Contact Us...

145

EPRI Maintenance Excellence Matrix Revision Status  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the progress in revising the Electric Power Research Institute EPRI 2002 Report 1004705, Maintenance Excellence Matrix Assessment Guideline for Fossil Power Plants, which provides utilities a comprehensive self-assessment guideline for improving maintenance processes.

2008-12-23T23:59:59.000Z

146

Document Preparation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Document Preparation Document Preparation Document Preparation Selected documents on the topic of NEPA Document Preparation. October 29, 2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA DOE Offices are encouraged to be inclusive in providing potentially interested parties with opportunities to review NEPA documents. This Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA is primarily intended to supplement lists that Departmental Offices compile for individual projects or facilities. It complements the EIS Distribution Guidance. The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance updates this Directory annually in July and may issue revisions throughout the year as new information becomes available. September 7, 2012 OMB and CEQ Joint Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict

147

DRAFT REVISION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Self-Evaluation Guide, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), 2001 Web Edition The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document...

148

ELM Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ELM Home Documents ELM Plan ELM Tracts Tract Map ELM at Work ELM Home Documents ELM Plan ELM Tracts Tract Map ELM at Work ELM Documents Committee Charter: The formal charge from the Fermilab director to the ELM committee. Committee Membership: A list of the current members of the ELM committee. Tract Management ELM Plan: The site ecological management plan for the current year. Tract List: A list of links to tract summaries from the latest approved ELM plan. Tract Map: An interactive map showing the locations of the various ELM tracts. Fire Management Non-structural Fire Management Plan: (Microsoft Word Document) Burn Histories: View the burn histories for the relevant ELM tracts. Map of Proposed Burns for the current or upcoming fire management season. This map is interactive and can also display the locations of past burn sites.

149

Key Documents  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

AOCS by-laws, code of ethics and anti trust policy established during our 100+ legacy. Key Documents AOCS History and Governance about us aocs committees contact us division council fats governing board history oils professionals science value cen

150

AFFECTED DOCUMENT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REF I I lOWED BY: (ORG) I I I I I TARGET DATE I CLOSING CCN COMPL DATE CLOSING REF TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION (TSD) BACKFIT (Documents dated prior to 1 November 1988) FUSRAP...

151

A Revised Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document is the result of a survey that gathered new or updated descriptions of currently available implementations of X.500, including commercial products and openly available offerings. This document is a revision of RFC 1292. We contacted each ...

A. Getchell; S. Sataluri

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

INCOMING DOCUMENT CONTROL FORM DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION ORGANIZATIO  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

INCOMING DOCUMENT CONTROL FORM DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION ORGANIZATIO )ATE COMPLETED: ACTION NUMBER: I ! I I DOCUMENT CONTROL DATE INITIALS DATA BASE: ACTION LOG: FILED: To : Doug Tonkay, OTS Decen From: MIchele Landis, dRW Subject: Draft report ~ Result= of the Radiologic; Former Ore Storage Site, Palmerton, Pennsylvania Attached is one copy of the draft report. PIE provide your comments to me by January 16, 1990. tlichele Landis ,9, 1989 "ey at the review and Results of the Radiological SJrvey at the Former Ore S&age Site, Palmerton, PennsylvLnia (PPOOI) J. L Quikd J. W. Cdchdr W. D. &rei ! I : HEALTH AND t5UEI-Y RESEARCH DMSi Waste Management Research and Development Prc (Activity No. AH 10 05 00 0; NEAHOOl) RESULTS OF 'I-HE RADIOLOGICAL SURV

153

Revision History  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision History Revision History Rev. 0, August 2012 Original submittal for milestone M3FT-12SN0804032 (Sandia programmatic and classification review) Rev. 1, September 2012 Corrected transposition errors in costing tables; recalculated stainless steel overpacks to be carbon steel; corrected various editorial problems. (SAND2012-7979P) Rev. 2, November 2012 Performed peer review and retitled. Submittal for milestone M2FT-13SN0804031 (formerly milestone M2FT- 12SN0804031) (SAND2012-9737P) Unclassified Unlimited Release Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

154

PETSc: Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Documentation Documentation Home Download Features Documentation Manual pages and Users Manual Citing PETSc Tutorials Installation AMS Changes Bug Reporting Code Management FAQ License Linear Solver Table Applications/Publications Miscellaneous External Software Developers Site PETSc is a sophisticated package and fully understanding its usage requires time. However, application programmers can easily begin to use PETSc from a high level and then gradually learn more details according to their needs. Users should read the users manual before attempting to do any serious coding with PETSc! PETSc users manual - pdf (fully searchable with hyperlinks) Index of all help topics Index of all manual pages Strategies for using PETSc with Fortran PETSc Manual Pages and Examples MPI TAO Vector Operations (Vec)

155

Oversight Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

oversight-documents Forrestal Building 1000 oversight-documents Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205851.800.dial.DOE en Independent Oversight Activity Report, Idaho Cleanup Project - November 2013 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/independent-oversight-activity-report-idaho-cleanup-project-november-2013 Independent Oversight Activity Report, Idaho Cleanup Project - November 2013

156

Enforcement Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

enforcement-documents Forrestal Building 1000 enforcement-documents Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205851.800.dial.DOE en Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-04 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/enforcement-letter-wel-2013-04 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-04

157

Referenced Documents  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 1   Thermal spray resource documents...www.aws.org ??A Guide to the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act? ? (U.K.) 1974, L1 ISBN 0 7176 044441 1 Free ??Risk Radar? software download ? Software Program Managers Network www.riskradarprogram.com...

158

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 569 comprises the following nine corrective action sites (CASs): 03-23-09, T-3 Contamination Area 03-23-10, T-3A Contamination Area 03-23-11, T-3B Contamination Area 03-23-12, T-3S Contamination Area 03-23-13, T-3T Contamination Area 03-23-14, T-3V Contamination Area 03-23-15, S-3G Contamination Area 03-23-16, S-3H Contamination Area 03-23-21, Pike Contamination Area The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 569 based on the implementation of the corrective actions listed in Table ES-2.

Sloop, Christy

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

ADR Revised Policy | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Policy Revised Policy ADR Revised Policy SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and othercollaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts. ADR Revised Policy More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc

160

Untitled Document  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

689-Rev. 1 689-Rev. 1 Nevada Environmental Restoration Project Site Characterization Work Plan for the Gnome-Coach Site, New Mexico Controlled Copy No.: Revision No.: 1 January 2002 Approved for public release; further dissemination is unlimited. U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office Environmental Restoration Division Available for public sale, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 800.553.6847 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: orders@ntis.fedworld.gov Online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm Available electronically at http://www.doe.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

CHRG Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Documents Documents Benefit Value Manual Davis-Bacon Act Desk Guide Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 DEAR 970.5204-81 Diversity Plan - Acquisition Letter Directory of Classifications DOE Acquisition Regulations (Chapter 970) DOE F 350.1 - Contractor Salary-Wage Increase Expenditure Report DOE O 311.1A Equal Opportunity and Diversity Program DOE O 350.1 "Contractor Human Resources Programs" DOE O 442.1 Employee Concerns Program Equal Employment Opportunity Preaward Clearance Request Form Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs Procurement Policy Flashes Service Contract Act of 1965 Wage Determination Request Form Wage Determinations On-line Workplace Substance Abuse Programs at DOE Sites Reports Annual Payroll & Residence Report for Oak Ridge Area

162

Untitled Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Study - Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Study - Main Menu DOE/CAO 95-1095 REMOTE-HANDLED TRANSURANIC WASTE STUDY U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Area Office Carlsbad, New Mexico October 1995 This document has been reproduced directly from the best possible copy. It is available to DOE and DOE contractors at the following address: Office of Scientific and Technical Information P. O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 For prices contact (615) 576-8401 The local WIPP contact for this document is George Basabilvazo (pronounced Baasa-bill-vaaso) (505) 234-7488 or E-Mail George.Basabilvazo@wipp.ws TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (See below) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (See below) 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Objectives 1.2 Background 2.0 THE TRANSURANIC WASTE DISPOSAL STRATEGY 2.1 Room Configuration

163

NEPA Documentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Note for: Cynthia Quarterman Note for: Cynthia Quarterman Keith Harper From: Carol Borgstrom Subject: NEPA Documentation Date: December 3, 2008 Attached, per your request, are two lists: (1) DOE environmental assessments (EAs) issued since 12/1/2006 and (2) DOE environmental impact statements (EISs) issued since 12/1/2006. Also, per your request, is a copy of a general NEPA briefing provided to the Acting Deputy Secretary in May 2008. Please let me know if you have any further questions (carol.borgstrom @hq.doe.gov; 202-586-4600). cc: Ingrid Kolb, MA-1 (without attachments) Janet Barsy, GC-1 EA Database Listing Document Start FONSI Months Total NEPA Cost Program Number Title Date Date Complete Ops Office Office DOE/EA-1389 Charlie Creek-Williston Transmission 3/20/2001 2/20/2008 83.2 $345,236.21 WAPA

164

Ehron Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ehron Documents Ehron Documents 1993 S-F-1325.12 CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL FORM (11-90) OFFICE OF THE EXECLTIVE SECRETARIAT ACTIVITY ADD DO NOT DETACH FROM ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE 01/19/93 10:17 SOURCE CODE pM PUBLIC MAIL SPEC INT: _ CONTROL N( S93-000578 DATE CORR: 01/13/93 DATERECD: 01/19/93 DATECNTRL: 01/19/93 -DATE DUE: LETTER: MEMO: TWX: _OTHER: MOTION TO:SECY: X DEPSEC: UN SEC: OTHER: ROM:FLOWERS,G PATRICK TX O REMARKS: ENRON CORP. UB J : LEGAL -=--_- LITIGATION FOR USE fY ACT N OFFICE ONLY MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE ACTION REFERRED TO DATE RETURN TO DUE OF NORTHERN NATURAL GAS CO., DATE TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE CO., 2 FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION CO... _3-_ ACTION TO: rr - TYPE ACTION: Appropriate action SIG OF: 3NCURRENCE: i NFORMATION:DS US EP FE ES1 D02 FILE CODE:PMFLOWFRS-ES930'00578 CONTROL ANALYST: B ATCHERSON 6-2255

165

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization. Revision 5  

SciTech Connect

This fifth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Information is presented on climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels, prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. Models are described that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. Federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable for the NEPA documents at the Hanford Site, are provided.

Cushing, C.E. [ed.] [ed.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

166

Clean Air Act. Revision 5  

SciTech Connect

This Reference Book contains a current copy of the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those regulations that implement the statute and appear to be most relevant to DOE activities. The document is provided to DOE and contractor staff for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. This Reference Book has been completely revised and is current through February 15, 1994.

Not Available

1994-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

167

The IMU's Electronic Initiatives (Revised Feb 2002)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Feb 15, 2002 ... This is a complicated world, for example, the CMS adheres to the IMU .... Queen Mary & Westfield College, London, UK; w.hodges@qmw.ac.uk...

168

Enron Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enron Documents 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 13S. 12 CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL FORM 1) OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT 8CTIVITY ADD DO NOT DETACH FROM ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE 0/03/Y4 10: O0 5OURCECODE PM PUBLIC MAIL :?EC INT: CONTROL NO: ES94-012853 ,ATE CORR: 04/25/94 DATE RECD: 05/02/94 DATE CNTRL: 05/03/94 DATE DUE: NONE :TTER: X MEMO: TWX: _ OTHER: TO: SECY: X DEP SEC: _ UN SEC: OTHER: )M:LAY,KENNETH L \ TX O REMARKS: RELATES TO ES94-009882. i ENRON CORP. J: PUBLIC INFORMATION NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL ---- FOR USE BY ACTION OFFICE ONLY- ACCEPTS INV ITATION TO CONTINUE DUE ACTION REFERRED TO DATE RETURN TO TO SERVE AS A MEMBER OF THE DATE NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL I ___ 21 3 I .CTION TO: FE TYPE ACTION: Appropriate action SIG OF: _ CURRENCE: ORMATION: ES D04

169

AFFECTED DOCUMENT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

rr-osams rr-osams ADMIN RCD _ RESPONSE TRACKING INFORMATION I 'OWED BY: (ORG) I TARGET DATE { I CLOSING CCN COMPL. DATE { CLOSING REF I I lOWED BY: (ORG) { { I { { TARGET DATE I CLOSING CCN COMPL DATE CLOSING REF TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION (TSD) BACKFIT (Documents dated prior to 1 November 1988) FUSRAP COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION DOEIORO TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION (CE·53) BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC. -JOB 14501 _-....Iome....:.-R..%.JI&~S::....:::S.::...- TO_---.,!5~Z~IJ~u..~ COMM DATE &6 tlJ t.e ADDR CODE I I I I CLOSES CCN WBS _....:,;},=(J ........ 2._--- _ NUMBER ST SUBJECT CODE 70()O DOE FILE NO. _ SUBJECT NFs S RESIDIJAl.J OIJR;T 1tJ/UL t2U /DffG-./NE.5 ~..:ll..Jll~~l...3Io.,;~..:ll..Jll~~Io....JIo,.;~~~~Io....JIo,.;~~~~Io....JIo,.;:Io....1.~~~"""";:Io....1.~CCN _

170

Enron Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 ,. OFC OU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET IMPORTANT ES NUMBER:- ES96-000274 EXTERNAL kTE OF DOC: 12/28/95 REC'D: 01/04/96 CONTROLLED: 01/04/96 DUE: 01/26/96 FROM: I HAVE A DREAM NOTE REA: SUBJECT INFORMS SECRETARY THAT ENRON SUMMARY: GORP HAS MADE A CONTRIBUTION TO "I HAVE A DREAM - HOUSTON" IN THE SECRETARY HONOR SOURCE: PUBLIC MAIL DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER ADDRESSED TO: SECRETARY FOR SIGNATURE OF: SECRETARY ACTION TO: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY ACTION TYPE: Prepare final reply ACTION OFFICER: WALLACE ONCURRENCE COPIES TO: NFORMATION COPIES TO: ES1 TEAM NCURRENCES COMPLETED: EMARKS: :XECUTIVE SECRETARIAT CONTACT: G Holloway -------------------------- EXEC SEC INTERNAL USE ----------------- SUBJECT CROSS REF: SPECIAL INT. CODE:

171

Revised (05/06)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 (Revised 03/12) Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Expires: General Information 1. Purpose Standard Remittance Advice (RA) form is a mandatory form designed to serve as the source document for entries into the Department's accounting records under Public Law 97-425 data from Purchasers concerning payment of their contribution to the Nuclear Waste Fund. 2. Who Shall Submit The RA must be submitted by Purchasers who signed the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste. Submit Copy 1, 2, and 3 to DOE, Energy Finance and Accounting Service Center and retain Copy 4.

172

EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1) EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1) The purpose of this document is to describe the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of...

173

Integrated test vehicle program plan: revision C  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This edition dated August 26, 1977, is Revision C of the Integrated Test Vehicle, Program Plan, Phase II - Deliverable Item 2-7-1. The original edition was issued on May 27, 1977. Corrections were made and issued as Proposed Modifications for Integrated Test Vehicle, Program Plan, dated July 8, 1977. For the purpose of documenting changes, the July 8, 1977, version is caled Revision A. The edition dated August 5, 1977, is called Revision B. Each paragraph in this edition is marked to indicate technical changes from previous editions.

Not Available

1977-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

174

Addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 406: Area 3 Building 03-74 & Building 03-58 Underground Discharge Points and Corrective Action Unit 429: Area 3 Building 03-55 & Area 9 Building 09-52 Underground Discharge Points, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document constitutes an addendum to the March 2000, Corrective Action Decision Document / Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 406: Area 3 Building 03-74 & 03-58 Underground Discharge Points and Corrective Action Unit 429: Area 3 Building 03-55 & Area 9 Building 09-52 Underground Discharge Points (TTR) as described in the document Recommendations and Justifications for Modifications for Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (UR Modification document) dated February 2008. The UR Modification document was approved by NDEP on February 26, 2008. The approval of the UR Modification document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR modifications. In conformance with the UR Modification document, this addendum consists of: This cover page that refers the reader to the UR Modification document for additional information The cover and signature pages of the UR Modification document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the UR Modification document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the UR for CAS 03-51-001-0355 Photo Shop UDP, Drains in CAU 429. It should be noted that there are no changes to CAU 406. This UR was established as part of a Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) corrective action and is based on the presence of contaminants at concentrations greater than the action levels established at the time of the initial investigation (FFACO, 1996; as amended August 2006). Since this UR was established, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective actions (RBCA) have changed. Therefore, this UR was re-evaluated against the current RBCA criteria as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006c). This re-evaluation consisted of comparing the original data (used to define the need for the UR) to risk-based final action levels (FALs) developed using the current Industrial Sites RBCA process. The re-evaluation resulted in a recommendation to remove the UR because contamination is not present at the site above the risk-based FALs. Requirements for inspecting and maintaining this UR will be canceled, and the postings and signage at this site will be removed. Fencing and posting may be present at this site that are unrelated to the FFACO UR such as for radiological control purposes as required by the NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual (NNSA/NSO, 2004f). This modification will not affect or modify any non-FFACO requirements for fencing, posting, or monitoring at this site.

Lynn Kidman

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

Last Revision Date: 8/16/2010 Last Merged Filing ID:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Revision Date: 8/16/2010 Last Merged Filing ID: Revision Date: 8/16/2010 Last Merged Filing ID: Tariffs, Rate Schedules, and Other Tariff Documents Southwestern Power Administration Tariffs, Rate Schedules, and Other Tariff Documents Document Generated On: 10/1/2010 Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................1 PREAMBLE: AUTHORITIES AND OBLIGATIONS .............................................................................................1

176

Enron Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 :. Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:10 PM Profile Page: 1 Folder Profile Control # 1998000752 Name letter to the Deputy Secretary from the Northeast States for Priority Important Folder Trigger Letter DOE Addressee Source PM-0 Elizabeth Moler I ___I |_______________ Correspondence Date 1/16/98 Subject Text e RE:AIR POLLUTION IMPACTS OF RIDS Information ead of Agency INCREASED DEREGULATION IN THE J ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY: AN INITIAL Sensitivity Not Applicable ANALYSIS - 1115/98 l Classification None Topical Index Point of Contact LOHRM -- i-na--u--e--Ap --- o--al 202 586-0471 Lohr, Michael Signature/Approval l _______________________________ _ . A ction O ffice # I l Action Requested Assigned To Appropriate Action _ PO Special Instructions Date Due I I Date Completed 1121/98

177

Untitled Document  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Release Schedule Release Schedule The initial release on April 15 includes a "Legislation and Regulations" section that discusses evolving legislative and regulatory issues, a "Market Trends" section which highlights and summarizes selected aspects of the projections for energy markets, and a comparison of AEO2013 with projections from other organizations. Additional issues analyses and its related data will follow on the dates indicated: Analyses Release Date Oil price and production trends in AEO2013 April 17, 2013 U.S. reliance on imported liquid fuels in alternative scenarios April 17, 2013 Competition between coal and natural gas in the electric power sector April, 23, 2013 Nuclear power in AEO2013 April 25, 2013 Updated no sunset and extended policy cases April 30, 2013

178

Microsoft Word - LBNL-57260-Revision.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7260-Revision 7260-Revision ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the Pharmaceutical Industry An ENERGY STAR ® Guide for Energy and Plant Managers Christina Galitsky, Sheng-chieh Chang, Ernst Worrell, and Eric Masanet Environmental Energy Technologies Division Sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency March 2008 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes

179

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this revision of the System Description Document (SDD) is to establish requirements that drive the design of the electrical power system and their bases to allow the design effort to proceed to License Application. This SDD is a living document that will be revised at strategic points as the design matures over time. This SDD identifies the requirements and describes the system design as they exist at this time, with emphasis on those attributes of the design provided to meet the requirements. This SDD has been developed to be an engineering tool for design control. Accordingly, the primary audience are design engineers. This type of SDD leads and follows the design process. It leads the design process with regard to the flow down of upper tier requirements onto the system. Knowledge of these requirements is essential to performing the design process. This SDD follows the design with regard to the description of the system. The description provided in the SDD is a reflection of the results of the design process to date. Functional and operational requirements applicable to this system are obtained from ''Project Functional and Operational Requirements'' (F&OR) (Siddoway, 2003). Other requirements to support the design process have been taken from higher level requirements documents such as ''Project Design Criteria Document'' (PDC) (Doraswamy 2004), the fire hazards analyses, and the preclosure safety analysis. The above mentioned low-level documents address ''Project Requirements Document'' (PRD) (Canori and Leitner 2003) requirements. This SDD includes several appendices with supporting information. Appendix B lists key system charts, diagrams, drawings, and lists; and Appendix C is a list of system procedures.

M. Maniyar

2004-06-22T23:59:59.000Z

180

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 168: Areas 25 and 26 Contaminated Materials and Waste Dumps, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0, Including Record of Technical Change No. 1  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies and rationalizes the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's selection of recommended corrective action alternatives (CAAs) to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU)168: Areas 25 and 26 Contaminated Materials and Waste Dumps, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in Areas 25 and 26 at the NTS in Nevada, CAU 168 is comprised of twelve Corrective Action Sites (CASs). Review of data collected during the corrective action investigation, as well as consideration of current and future operations in Areas 25 and 26 of the NTS, led the way to the development of three CAAs for consideration: Alternative 1 - No Further Action; Alternative 2 - Clean Closure; and Alternative 3 - Close in Place with Administrative Controls. As a result of this evaluation, a combination of all three CAAs is recommended for this CAU. Alternative 1 was the preferred CAA for three CASs, Alternative 2 was the preferred CAA for six CASs (and nearly all of one other CAS), and Alternative 3 was the preferred CAA for two CASs (and a portion of one other CAS) to complete the closure at the CAU 168 sites. These alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated as well as all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the sites and elimination of potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated soils at CAU 168.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-08-08T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Document clustering with committees  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Document clustering is useful in many information retrieval tasks: document browsing, organization and viewing of retrieval results, generation of Yahoo-like hierarchies of documents, etc. The general goal of clustering is to group data elements such that the intra-group similarities are high and the inter-group similarities are low. We present a clustering algorithm called CBC (Clustering By Committee) that is shown to produce higher quality clusters in document clustering tasks as compared to several well known clustering algorithms. It initially discovers a set of tight clusters (high intra-group similarity), called committees, that are well scattered in the similarity space (low inter-group similarity). The union of the committees is but a subset of all elements. The algorithm proceeds by assigning elements to their most similar committee. Evaluating cluster quality has always been a difficult task. We present a new evaluation methodology that is based on the editing distance between output clusters and manually constructed classes (the answer key). This evaluation measure is more intuitive and easier to interpret than previous evaluation measures.

Patrick Pantel; Dekang Lin

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 7  

SciTech Connect

This seventh revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes up-to-date information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, environmental monitoring, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. More detailed data are available from reference sources cited or from the authors. Chapter 5.0 was not updated from the sixth revision (1994). It describes models, including their principal underlying assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. The updated Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE Orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site, following the structure of Chapter 4.0. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be used directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the Hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

Cushing, C.E. [ed.] ed.; Baker, D.A.; Chamness, M.A. [and others] and others

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 6  

SciTech Connect

This sixth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes up-to-date information on climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. More detailed data are available from reference sources cited or from the authors; Chapter 5.0 has been significantly updated from the fifth revision. It describes models, including their principal underlying assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions; The updated Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site, following the structure of Chapter 4.0. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be utilized directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the Hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

Cushing, C.E. [ed.; Baker, D.A.; Chamness, M.A. [and others

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

Steam Generator Management Program Administrative Procedures, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Steam Generator Management Program (SGMP) developed many of the guidelines that implement NEI 97-06, Steam Generator Program Guidelines, including a 2001 document that defined and formalized the programmatic elements of SGMP itself. This revision of SGMP Administrative Procedures aligns SGMP with the May 2003 guideline NEI 03-08, which addressed several recent issues involving materials degradation. The revision defines how guidelines are to be revised and approved and presents the SGMP charter, whic...

2004-12-09T23:59:59.000Z

185

ELECTRICAL SUPPORT SYSTEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this revision of the System Design Description (SDD) is to establish requirements that drive the design of the electrical support system and their bases to allow the design effort to proceed to License Application. This SDD is a living document that will be revised at strategic points as the design matures over time. This SDD identifies the requirements and describes the system design as they exist at this time, with emphasis on those attributes of the design provided to meet the requirements. This SDD has been developed to be an engineering tool for design control. Accordingly, the primary audience/users are design engineers. This type of SDD both ''leads'' and ''trails'' the design process. It leads the design process with regard to the flow down of upper tier requirements onto the system. Knowledge of these requirements is essential in performing the design process. The SDD trails the design with regard to the description of the system. The description provided in the SDD is a reflection of the results of the design process to date. Functional and operational requirements applicable to electrical support systems are obtained from the ''Project Functional and Operational Requirements'' (F&OR) (Siddoway 2003). Other requirements to support the design process have been taken from higher-level requirements documents such as the ''Project Design Criteria Document'' (PDC) (Doraswamy 2004), and fire hazards analyses. The above-mentioned low-level documents address ''Project Requirements Document'' (PRD) (Canon and Leitner 2003) requirements. This SDD contains several appendices that include supporting information. Appendix B lists key system charts, diagrams, drawings, and lists, and Appendix C includes a list of system procedures.

S. Roy

2004-06-24T23:59:59.000Z

186

Documents: Final PEIS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Final PEIS Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Final Programmatic EIS DOEEIS-0269 Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for...

187

Documents: NEPA Support  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents NEPA Support PDF Icon Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Management Program: Data Compilation for the Paducah Site...

188

ARM - XDC Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Documentation External Data Center Order Data Description of External Data Streams Data Viewers and Plots (selected data sets) XDC Documentation XDC Documentation BNL's ARM Related...

189

ZeptoOS // Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Documentation Visit the ZeptoOS Documentation Wiki for a complete ZeptoOS documentation, including a list of features, requirements, limitations, and changes from previous...

190

SRS - ARRA General Provisions and Related Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) General Provisions and Related Documents General Provisions/Terms and Conditions Documents Certifications Solicitation/Subcontract Documents Focused Observation Safety Checklists Construction Subcontract Documents/Forms General Provisions/Terms and Conditions Documents DOCUMENT NUMBER TITLE REVISION # or DATE SRNS-MS-2009-00069 Fixed Price Orders 5 SRNS-MS-2009-00072 Construction Subcontract Exhibit A 7 SRNS-MS-2009-00073 Time and Material / Labor Hour 5 SRNS-MS-2009-00074 Commercial Terms and Conditions for Dismantling, Demolition, or Removal of Improvements 5 SRNS-MS-2009-00075 Corporate Professional Services 6 SRNS-MS-2009-00076 Individual Consultants 5 SRNS-MS-2010-00085 Cost Reimbursement Orders with Educational Institutions 4

191

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 MERRTT Revision Letter 8 MERRTT Revision Letter 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students' understanding of the decontamination dress-down process at an accident scene. Additional enhancements included the streamlining of objectives from the Terminology & Units and Assessing Package Integrity modules into other existing modules. 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter More Documents & Publications 2009 TEPP Annual Report

192

BSCMeasuresInformationRevisionSept2005.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Procurement System Balanced Scorecard Performance Measures Information Document Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Revised: September 2005 2 Table of Contents Purpose ...................................................................................................... 4 CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE Customer Satisfaction: Timeliness ........................................................................................... 5 Quality ................................................................................................ 7 Effective Service/Partnership ........................................................................... 9 INTERNAL BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE Acquisition Excellence .................................................................................. 11

193

Planning and initiation of detailed engineering design for the Great Plains coal gasification project. Final report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During the course of detailed engineering it was expected that preliminary engineering documents would need to be modified. In a number of instances, however, especially for flow diagrams and specifications, the revised preliminary engineering documents became the final approved for construction (AFC) documents. P and ID's and plot plans were updated as a result of the detailed piping design. Equipment data sheets which initially contained basic process data were made mechanically complete and then further updated to reflect the equipment actually purchased. The initial issue of the preliminary engineering documents represent a necessary baseline for monitoring project design changes. Foundation work, equipment specifications and status of engineering in the various process operations are discussed.

Not Available

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS MODEL FOR DWPF CANISTER FILLING, REVISION 1  

SciTech Connect

This revision is an extension of the COMSOL Multiphysics model previously developed and documented to simulate the temperatures of the glass during pouring a Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) canister. In that report the COMSOL Multiphysics model used a lumped heat loss term derived from experimental thermocouple data based on a nominal pour rate of 228 lbs./hr. As such, the model developed using the lumped heat loss term had limited application without additional experimental data. Therefore, the COMSOL Multiphysics model was modified to simulate glass pouring and subsequent heat input which, replaced the heat loss term in the initial model. This new model allowed for changes in flow geometry based on pour rate as well as the ability to increase and decrease flow and stop and restart flow to simulate varying process conditions. A revised COMSOL Multiphysics model was developed to predict temperatures of the glass within DWPF canisters during filling and cooldown. The model simulations and experimental data were in good agreement. The largest temperature deviations were {approx} 40 C for the 87 inch thermocouple location at 3000 minutes and during the initial cool down at the 51 inch location occurring at approximately 600 minutes. Additionally, the model described in this report predicts the general temperature trends during filling and cooling as observed experimentally. The revised model incorporates a heat flow region corresponding to the glass pouring down the centerline of the canister. The geometry of this region is dependent on the flow rate of the glass and can therefore be used to see temperature variations for various pour rates. The equations used for this model were developed by comparing simulation output to experimental data from a single pour rate. Use of the model will predict temperature profiles for other pour rates but the accuracy of the simulations is unknown due to only a single flow rate comparison.

Kesterson, M.

2011-09-08T23:59:59.000Z

195

CSMRI DOCUMENT REPOSITORY INDEX Revised June 15, 2007  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) limits, but on average the material would not be classified as hazardous concentrations of metals (but below TCLP limits) and potential areas with limited radionuclide activity that are in excess of the TCLP limits for lead (40CFR261.24, table 1, EPA hazardous waste number - D008). The Class 1

196

Decommissioning Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Documents Decommissioning Documents Decommissioning Documents More Documents & Publications CX-002246: Categorical Exclusion Determination Decommissioning Handbook CX-003134:...

197

Decommissioning Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Documents Decommissioning Documents Decommissioning Documents More Documents & Publications CX-002246: Categorical Exclusion Determination Decommissioning Handbook CX-000018:...

198

Microsoft Word - Document Numbering Plan.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

document Number Plan 11/3/2005 document Number Plan 11/3/2005 All documents numbers start with a 9 9 _ _ ___ | | | | | Document per chart | Generation (i.e. PSS has 1,2&3, FEEPS has 1&2) Use 0 when the document doesn't apply to any of these System 0- Non system Specific (group wide) 1- PSS 2- Reserved for PSS expansion 3- FEEPS 4- Reserved for FEEPS expansion 5- BLEPS 6- Reserved for BLEPS expansion 7- DIW 8- Reserved for future use 9- Reserved for future use 000-099 Requirements 000 - Statement of work For x.1.4.1.4 - Design Statement of Work For Beamlines - Installation Statement of Work 001-009 Reserved for Statement of Works for upgrade, revisions, add-ons, etc. 010 - Cost Estimate 011-019 Additional Cost Estimates

199

Document Library | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Document Library Services » Document Library Document Library January 30, 2006 International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative: Annual Report 2005 The International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative (I-NERI) supports the National Energy Policy by conducting research to advance the state of nuclear science and technology in the United States. I-NERI sponsors innovative scientific and engineering research and development (R&D) in cooperation with participating countries. The research performed under the I-NERI umbrella addresses the key issues affecting the future of nuclear energy and its global deployment. September 18, 2005 Agreement between the Department of Energy of the United States of America and the Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique of France To amend Article 12.1 of the Agreement to read as follows:

200

Documents: Cost Analysis  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Analysis Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Cost Analysis PDF Icon Summary of the Cost Analysis Report for the Long-term Management of Depleted UF6...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Sourcebook for Plant Layup and Equipment Preservation (Revision 1)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This revision of a 1987 sourcebook documents preferred industry layup practices for the various systems and components of PWR and BWR nuclear plants. Plants that have not implemented layup programs will find the sourcebook a useful reference document in program development.

1992-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

202

Generic safety documentation model  

SciTech Connect

This document is intended to be a resource for preparers of safety documentation for Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico facilities. It provides standardized discussions of some topics that are generic to most, if not all, Sandia/NM facilities safety documents. The material provides a ``core`` upon which to develop facility-specific safety documentation. The use of the information in this document will reduce the cost of safety document preparation and improve consistency of information.

Mahn, J.A.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

Requesting a Revision to PUB-3000  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual The following procedure describes the process for making changes to Berkeley Lab's ES&H Manual (PUB-3000). It identifies Responsible Authors who participate in the revision process. A request to revise the ES&H Manual may be initiated by any Berkeley Lab employee; however, all requests must be sent to the Responsible Author and approved by the ES&H Manual Manager, Mike Wisherop. If you wish to request a change to a PUB-3000 chapter, follow these steps: Contact the Responsible Author for the chapter in need of revision. Submit PUB-3000 revisions to the Responsible Author and the ES&H Manual Manager. Direct all questions or comments concerning ES&H Manual content to the ES&H Manual Manager.

204

Edison Systems Technology Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technology Documentation Systems Technology Documentation Downloads CrayXC30Networking.pdf | Adobe Acrobat PDF file Cray XC30 Networking SonexionBrochure.pdf | Adobe Acrobat PDF...

205

Regulatory guidance document  

SciTech Connect

The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Program Management System Manual requires preparation of the OCRWM Regulatory Guidance Document (RGD) that addresses licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance. The document provides: regulatory compliance policy; guidance to OCRWM organizational elements to ensure a consistent approach when complying with regulatory requirements; strategies to achieve policy objectives; organizational responsibilities for regulatory compliance; guidance with regard to Program compliance oversight; and guidance on the contents of a project-level Regulatory Compliance Plan. The scope of the RGD includes site suitability evaluation, licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance, in accordance with the direction provided by Section 4.6.3 of the PMS Manual. Site suitability evaluation and regulatory compliance during site characterization are significant activities, particularly with regard to the YW MSA. OCRWM`s evaluation of whether the Yucca Mountain site is suitable for repository development must precede its submittal of a license application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Accordingly, site suitability evaluation is discussed in Chapter 4, and the general statements of policy regarding site suitability evaluation are discussed in Section 2.1. Although much of the data and analyses may initially be similar, the licensing process is discussed separately in Chapter 5. Environmental compliance is discussed in Chapter 6. Safety and Health compliance is discussed in Chapter 7.

NONE

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

SNF AGING SYSTEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this system description document (SDD) is to establish requirements that drive the design of the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) aging system and associated bases, which will allow the design effort to proceed. This SDD will be revised at strategic points as the design matures. This SDD identifies the requirements and describes the system design, as it currently exists, with emphasis on attributes of the design provided to meet the requirements. This SDD is an engineering tool for design control; accordingly, the primary audience and users are design engineers. This SDD is part of an iterative design process. It leads the design process with regard to the flow down of upper tier requirements onto the system. Knowledge of these requirements is essential in performing the design process. The SDD follows the design with regard to the description of the system. The description provided in the SDD reflects the current results of the design process. Throughout this SDD, the term aging cask applies to vertical site-specific casks and to horizontal aging modules. The term overpack is a vertical site-specific cask that contains a dual-purpose canister (DPC) or a disposable canister. Functional and operational requirements applicable to this system were obtained from ''Project Functional and Operational Requirements'' (F&OR) (Curry 2004 [DIRS 170557]). Other requirements that support the design process were taken from documents such as ''Project Design Criteria Document'' (PDC) (BSC 2004 [DES 171599]), ''Site Fire Hazards Analyses'' (BSC 2005 [DIRS 172174]), and ''Nuclear Safety Design Bases for License Application'' (BSC 2005 [DIRS 171512]). The documents address requirements in the ''Project Requirements Document'' (PRD) (Canori and Leitner 2003 [DIRS 166275]). This SDD includes several appendices. Appendix A is a Glossary; Appendix B is a list of key system charts, diagrams, drawings, lists and additional supporting information; and Appendix C is a list of procedures that will be used to operate the system.

L.L. Swanson

2005-04-06T23:59:59.000Z

207

Integrated Materials Information DVD - Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This EPRI Materials Initiative Document Suite on CD is an interim step toward implementation of an internet-based system for presentation and maintenance of EPRI materials initiative documents and associated links to key EPRI products. The EPRI materials initiative was developed to address NEI 03-08, "Guideline for the Management of Materials Issues." NEI 03-08 outlines the policy and practices that the industry has committed to follow in managing materials aging issues. Two standing committees were esta...

2011-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

208

Quality System Documentation Management  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Quality System Documentation Management. ... Minutes, summaries, or notes from Management Meetings of significance are archived here. ...

2012-08-21T23:59:59.000Z

209

F.2 DOCUMENT CHARACTERISTICS TITLE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

eam3gui3_e20_ri_web Edition Number 2.0 Edition Date 21-03-2006 The previous versions of EAM 3 / GUI 3 were produced before the approval of ESARR 1 and the entry into force of the SES Regulations. As such, their enactment has necessitated a review of the documentin order to ensure its consistency with this new regulatory material. As a first step in this review process, the SRC has produced this version of EAM 3 / GUI 3 to include a new table with guidance on the criteria for the assessment of compliance with ESARR 3. This table replaces the former highlevel checklists included in previous versions of the document. Apart from the new table, no other contents have currently been modified. However, it is intended to produce a fully revised version of EAM 3 / GUI 3 to provide NSAs with guidance on the safety oversight of ESARR 3-related requirements.

Eam Gui; Eam Gui

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

CANISTER HANDLING FACILITY DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this facility description document (FDD) is to establish requirements and associated bases that drive the design of the Canister Handling Facility (CHF), which will allow the design effort to proceed to license application. This FDD will be revised at strategic points as the design matures. This FDD identifies the requirements and describes the facility design, as it currently exists, with emphasis on attributes of the design provided to meet the requirements. This FDD is an engineering tool for design control; accordingly, the primary audience and users are design engineers. This FDD is part of an iterative design process. It leads the design process with regard to the flowdown of upper tier requirements onto the facility. Knowledge of these requirements is essential in performing the design process. The FDD follows the design with regard to the description of the facility. The description provided in this FDD reflects the current results of the design process.

J.F. Beesley

2005-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

211

Solar America Initiative | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solar America Initiative. Solar America Initiative More Documents & Publications Low Cost High Concentration PV Systems for Utility Power Generation Amonix, Inc. Low Cost High...

212

Documents: DUF6 Conversion EIS Supporting Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DUF6 Conversion EIS DUF6 Conversion EIS Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents NEPA Compliance: DUF6 Conversion EIS Supporting Documents PDF Icon Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Approach for the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Conversion Facilities Project 38 KB details PDF Icon Press Release: DOE Seeks Public Input for Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Environmental Impact Statement 90 KB details PDF Icon Advance Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facilities 52 KB details PDF Icon Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facilities 60 KB details PDF Icon Overview: Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Management Program

213

Document Control Template-Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5ADocument Control Template - ExcelForm EOTA - Business Form Document Title: P-001, Document Control Process Document Number: Document Control Template - Excel Form EOTA...

214

Document Control Template-Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4Document Control Template - Form 110815.doc 110815 Page 1 of 5 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Document Control Template - Form Document Number: F-004 Rev. 110815...

215

Microsoft Word - Creston-Bell Revision Sheet__final.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Creston-Bell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Revision Sheet DOE/EA-4406 Summary Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) released the Creston-Bell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA) in April 2012 for public comment. BPA sent the Preliminary EA to agencies and interested parties. Notification that the EA was available and how to request a copy was sent to all others on the mailing list of potentially affected parties. BPA received six comments and responded to these comments in this revision sheet. This revision sheet documents the changes to be incorporated into the EA. The Preliminary EA, with the addition of these changes, constitutes the Final EA, which will not be reprinted.

216

EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement 6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington The revised draft of the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement (HSW EIS) provides environmental and technical information concerning U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposed waste management practices at the Hanford Site. DOE/EIS-0286, Richland Operations Office, Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary (March 2003) EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-01-2003.pdf EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-02-2003_0.pdf More Documents & Publications

217

WIPP Documents - EPA Certification  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(PCBs) at WIPP This document provides EPA approval for the disposal of TRU and TRU-Mixed waste containing PCBs at the WIPP. Attached to this document is a list of conditions...

218

Acceptable NSLS Safety Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Acceptable NSLS Safety Documentation Print NSLS users who have completed NSLS Safety Module must present a copy of one of the following documents to receive ALS 1001: Safety at the...

219

2009 Revisions EIA-914  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

for Texas, which was partially the cause for the review of the EIA-914, which, in turn, led to the development and implementation of this new methodology. Downward revisions in...

220

Waste generation forecast for DOE-ORO`s Environmental Restoration OR-1 Project: FY 1995-FY 2002, September 1994 revision  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A comprehensive waste-forecasting task was initiated in FY 1991 to provide a consistent, documented estimate of the volumes of waste expected to be generated as a result of U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations (DOE-ORO) Environmental Restoration (ER) OR-1 Project activities. Continual changes in the scope and schedules for remedial action (RA) and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) activities have required that an integrated data base system be developed that can be easily revised to keep pace with changes and provide appropriate tabular and graphical output. The output can then be analyzed and used to drive planning assumptions for treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities. The results of this forecasting effort and a description of the data base developed to support it are provided herein. The initial waste-generation forecast results were compiled in November 1991. Since the initial forecast report, the forecast data have been revised annually. This report reflects revisions as of September 1994.

Not Available

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

GTT Tranmission Workshop- Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Use the links below to download documents from the GTT Transmission Workshop, held November 1-2, 2012.

222

PDF Document (1188k)  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Only critical information was scanned. Entire document is available upon request - Click here to email a request....

223

Frequently Requested Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This is an index of frequently requested documents provided by the Department of Energy Headquarters and Field Organizations.

224

Document Status & Schedules  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document graphically displays the milestone dates and projected schedules of key Environmental Impact Statements (updated monthly).

225

Required Calibrations Legal Document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... This document is a Calibration Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (C-CRADA) between your company and NIST. ...

2013-07-17T23:59:59.000Z

226

Clean Cities Annual Metrics Report 2009 (Revised)  

SciTech Connect

Document provides Clean Cities coalition metrics about the use of alternative fuels; the deployment of alternative fuel vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and idle reduction initiatives; fuel economy activities; and programs to reduce vehicle miles driven.

Johnson, C.

2011-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

Basic Research for the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Basic Research for the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative Basic Research for the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative Basic Research for the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative More Documents & Publications...

228

Documented Safety Analysis  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Documented Safety Analysis Documented Safety Analysis FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: A document that provides an adequate description of the hazards of a facility during its design, construction, operation, and eventual cleanup and the basis to prescribe operating and engineering controls through Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) or Administrative Controls (AC). REQUIREMENTS:  10 CFR 830.204, Nuclear Safety Rule  DOE-STD-1027-92, Hazard Categorization, 1992.  DOE-STD-1104-96, Change Notice 1, Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Documents (documented Safety Analyses and Technical Safety Requirements), dated May 2002.  DOE-STD-3009-2002, Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses, Change Notice No. 2, April 2002.

229

ARM - Data Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Documentation Documentation Policies, Plans, Descriptions Data Documentation Home Data Sharing and Distribution Policy Data Management and Documentation Plan Data Product Registration and Submission Reading netCDF and HDF Data Files Time in ARM netCDF Data Files Data Archive Documentation ARM Archive's Catalog of Data Streams (Updated monthly) Access to Historical ARM Data More on Understanding and Finding ARM Data Data Quality Problem Reporting Data Documentation A day of data files is bundled or processed into a single 24-hour file that represents a data stream, which is then stored at the ARM Data Archive. A day of data files is bundled or processed into a single 24-hour file that represents a data stream, which is then stored at the ARM Data Archive. Data collected through the routine operations and scientific field

230

EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » EM Quality Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) Previous revision of the Environmental Management Quality Assurance Program. The program is the EM management system to ensure we"do work correctly." This document has been superseded by Revision 1 of the program, but is still in use at some EM sites. EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) More Documents & Publications Quality Assurance Program EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1) SOPP-43, EM-23 Quality Assurance Oversight Waste Management Nuclear Materials & Waste Tank Waste and Waste Processing Waste Disposition Packaging and Transportation Site & Facility Restoration

231

Status of Revisions to ASHRAE Standard 62  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 62- 1989 "Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor air Quality", adopted in 1989, is widely used by HVAC engineers to determine ventilation rates for various occupancies. This standard has also been cited in court to help demonstrate compliance with state-of the- art indoor environmental design. In August 1996, ASHRAE released for public review Standard 62-1989R, the highly controversial proposed revisions to the Standard 62- 1989. Over 8,000 comments were received on the proposed revision. Due to the significant number of concerns expressed by ASHRAE members as well as others, ASHRAE withdrew the proposed new standard and placed the current standard in "continuous maintenance." As part of the continuous maintenance process ASHRAE is transforming the current Standard 62- 1989 from a design standard to code ready document. Furthermore, two code documents will be produced4ne for low-rise residential buildings and another for other types of occupancy. Finally, two new documents, a user's manual and an IAQ guideline, will be written concurrent with the code documents. The guideline document is intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance to designers while good IAQ practices not appropriate for codification will be incorporated into the guideline. It is likely that many of the provision in Standard 62-1989R will survive in some manner in one or more of the new documents to be produced. This paper will detail some of the more significant changes that were proposed in Standard 62-1989R and review the current state of standard development.

Gallo, F. M.

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

232

WIPP RCRA Documents menu  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the Transuranic Waste Characterization Task Force Final Report EEG Response to NAS WIPP Committee Questions for May 19, 2003 Meeting Quality Assurance Program Document Rev. 9...

233

Geothermal: Hot Documents Search  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

GEOTHERMAL TECHNOLOGIES LEGACY COLLECTION - Hot Documents Search Geothermal Technologies Legacy Collection HelpFAQ | Site Map | Contact Us | Admin Log On HomeBasic Search About...

234

PETSc: Documentation: AMS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Argonne Memory Snooper Home Download Features Documentation Manual pages and Users Manual Citing PETSc Tutorials Installation AMS Changes Bug Reporting Code Management FAQ...

235

PETSc: Documentation: Installation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Installation Home Download Features Documentation Manual pages and Users Manual Citing PETSc Tutorials Installation AMS Changes Bug Reporting Code Management FAQ License Linear...

236

ISO Standards Documents  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

ISO/TC 34: Food products and TC 34/SC 17: Management systems for food safety ISO Standards Documents iso3rss ISO Standards Development ISO Standards Development

237

(1) Shaw AREVA MOX Services Revised Updated Reply to Notice of Violation 70-  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Materials" This letter corrects an error in our letter of September 1,2011. In that letter, we stated in Item 5 on Page 6 of the Enclosure, that document DCSOI-ZMJ-DS-NTE-N-65973 had been revised. The revision was not approved until September 6, 2011. The Enclosure has been revised accordingly. If you have any questions, please contact Jim O'Dell, Regulatory Compliance Manager, at (803) 819-2234. Sincerely,

Kelly Trice; Eric Chassard; Mox Services; Sam Glenn Nnsa/srs; William Gloersen Nrc/rii; Mark Gober; Mox Services; Dealis Gwyn; Mox Services; Melvin Shannon Nrc/srs

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

238

Standard format and content acceptance criteria for the Material Control and Accounting (MC and A) Reform Amendment: 10 CFR Part 74, Subpart E. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

In 1987 the NRC revised the material control and accounting requirements for NRC licensees authorized to possess and use a formula quantity (i.e., 5 formula kilograms or more) of strategic special nuclear material. Those revisions issued as 10 CFR 74.51-59 require timely monitoring of in-process inventory and discrete items to detect anomalies potentially indicative of material losses. Timely detection and enhanced loss localization capabilities are beneficial to alarm resolution and also for material recovery in the event of an actual loss. NUREG-1280 was issued in 1987 to present criteria that could be used by applicants, licensees, and NRC license reviewers in the initial preparation and subsequent review of fundamental nuclear material control (FNMC) plans submitted in response to the Reform Amendment. This document is also intended for both licensees and license reviewers with respect to FNMC plan revisions. General performance objectives, system capabilities, process monitoring, item monitoring, alarm resolution, quality assurance, and accounting are addressed. This revision to NUREG-1280 is an expansion of the initial edition, which clarifies and expands upon several topics and addresses issues identified under Reform Amendment implementation experience.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

239

PROJECT/CAMPAIGN Document Name  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Canopy Chemistry Program (ACCP) Project/Campaign Document Canopy Chemistry Program (ACCP) Project/Campaign Document Summary: TThe Accelerated Canopy Chemistry Program (ACCP) was charged to determine whether a sound theoretical and empirical basis existed for the estimation of nitrogen and lignin concentrations in ecosystem canopies from remote sensing data. Three streams of activity were initiated to meet this charge: 1) new field and remote sensing data acquisitions for well-characterized sites, 2) canopy-level radiosity and ray-tracing modeling, and 3) intercomparison of information extraction techniques. 1991-1992. Table of Contents: 1 Project/Campaign Overview 2 Data Availability 3 Data Access 4 Principal Investigator Information 5 Submitting Investigator Information 6 References 7 Glossary of Terms 8 List of Acronyms

240

Appendix A: Conceptual Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NREL-Research Support Facilities TABLE OF CONTENTS NREL-Research Support Facilities TABLE OF CONTENTS Solicitation No. RFJ-8-77550 Appendix A: Conceptual Documents Page 1 of 299 February 6, 2008 Appendix A CONCEPTUAL DOCUMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 2 PART 1-PROCEDURES .......................................................................................................... 3 PART 2-PROGRAM ............................................................................................................... 59 PART 3-PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS .................................................................... 245 APPENDIX LIST .................................................................................................................. 299

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Cray XT Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cray XT Documentation Cray XT Documentation Cray XT Documentation & Cray XT Documentation Search Preferences | Advanced Search Home Browse Books Man Pages Glossary Platforms Cray XC30 Cray XE and Cray XK Cray XT Cray Sonexion Cray X2 Cray X1 Knowledge Base by Category by Date by Platform by Title by User Release Announcements @Twitter Cray XT System Documentation Getting Started Cray XT System Overview Cray Linux Environment (CLE) Software Release Overview Cray Linux Environment (CLE) Software Release Overview Supplement Glossary of Terms Programming Environment Cray Application Developer's Environment User's Guide Cray Compiling Environment (CCE) Cray Fortran Reference Manual crayftn man page Cray C and C++ Reference Manual craycc man page crayCC man page Intrinsic function man pages Assign environment man pages

242

CAPTURE DOCUMENT ORAUTEAM  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATA DATA CAPTURE DOCUMENT ORAUTEAM ---- Dose Reconstruction ~v~:7 DISCOVERY AND REVIEW dA'~ Project for NIOSH The attached document may contain Privacy Act data. This information is protected by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. §552a; disclosure to any third party without written consent of the individual to whom the information pertains is strictly prohibited. Data Capture Team or Other ORAU Team Member Capturing Data: Complete all information that applies to the data/document being submitted lor uploading to the Site Research Database (SRDB), attach this lonm to the lront olthe document, and send to: ORAU Team, Attention: SRDB Uploading, 4850 Smith Rd., Suite 200, Cincinnati, Ohio 45212. I ~ -!-R"e"guestor and Reviewer 1. Data Requestor: RSET Group 2. Reviewer Name (if different from Requestor): Don Morris 3. Target Data: Document Specified by Requestor Any relevant

243

Document Imaging | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Document Imaging Document Imaging Employee Services Cafeterias Conferencing and Special Events Copy Services Document Imaging Exchange Visitors Program Facility Operations Food...

244

Documents: DUF6 Fact Sheets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fact Sheets Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents DUF6 Fact Sheets PDF Icon Overview of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Management Program 174 KB...

245

Document Control Template-Instruction  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2ADocument Control Template - Instruction.doc Page 1 of 6 EOTA - Business Instruction Document Title: Document Control Template - Instruction Document Number: F-002 Rev. A...

246

Document Control Template-Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Media Requests 080904 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: ITTP-018, Media Inventory Control Document Number: Media Requests ITT, ADM Ben Aragon NA Referenced Documents: Parent...

247

EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Record of Decision Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision Offer of Conditional Commitment for a Loan Guarantee for, and Electrical Interconnection of, the Shepherds Flat Wind Project; Bonneville Power Administration The U.S. Department of Energy announces its decisions to provide a conditional loan guarantee for, and interconnection to the Federal Columbia River Transmission River (FCRTS) of, the 846-megawatt (MW) Shepherds. DOE/EIS-0183, Revised Record of Decision for Offer of Conditional Commitment for a Loan Guarantee for, and Electrical Interconnection of, the Shepherds Flat Wind Project; Bonneville Power Administration, (October 2010) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision

248

Technical Repair Guidelines for Limitorque Model SMB-000 Valve Actuators: Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This technical repair guide (TRG) for Limitorque motor-operated valve (MOV) actuator model SMB-000 is the first in a series of documents devoted to the comprehensive maintenance and repair of Limitorque actuators. This guide provides instructions for engineering, operations, and maintenance personnel on MOV actuator repair, maintenance, adjustment, and troubleshooting methods. Originally published in 1989, this document has now been thoroughly revised (Revision 1) to incorporate new information and techn...

1994-10-02T23:59:59.000Z

249

Corel Office Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Effective Date 08/03/2010 Effective Date 08/03/2010 WP 08-PT.08 Revision 6 WIPP Centralized Procurement Program Plan Cognizant Section: Packaging Approved by: Todd Sellmer Working Copy WIPP Centralized Procurement Program Plan WP 08-PT.08, Rev. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................ iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ...........................................................................................

250

ASHRAE Cleanroom Benchmarking Paper - REVISED  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8E 8E Cleanroom Energy Efficiency: Metrics and Benchmarking Paul Mathew, William Tschudi, Dale Sartor Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory James Beasley International SEMATECH Manufacturing Initiative October 2010 Published in ASHRAE Journal, v. 53, issue 10 DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe

251

Forensic Database Questioned Documents Table  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... specific user requirements. There is an API through which digital documents can be passed for analysis. Documents such ...

2013-06-06T23:59:59.000Z

252

Support System Initiating Events  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents current methods to identify and quantify support system initiating events SSIEs used in probabilistic risk assessment PRA. This report updates the guidance provided in an EPRI report published in 2006, Support System Initiating Events: Identification and Quantification Guideline 1013490, and has been developed with input from a broad spectrum of the PRA community. Cooperation with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC and Idaho National Laboratory INL, under the provisions of t...

2008-12-19T23:59:59.000Z

253

GENII Guidance Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

GENII Computer Code GENII Computer Code Application Guidance for Documented Safety Analysis Final Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety, and Health 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20585-2040 July 2004 GENII Guidance Report July 2004 Final Report INTENTIONALLY BLANK ii GENII Guidance Report July 2004 Final Report FOREWORD This document provides guidance to Department of Energy (DOE) facility analysts in the use of the GENII computer code for supporting Documented Safety Analysis applications. Information is provided herein that supplements information found in the GENII documentation provided by the code developer. GENII is one of six computer codes designated by the DOE Office of Environmental, Safety and Health as a toolbox code for safety analysis.

254

Meeting Decisions and Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Meeting Notices Meeting Decisions & Documents Production Team Indicators System Coastal Resilience Resources Make Our Science Accessible Link Climate Change & Health Provide Data and Tools Coordinate Internationally Meeting Decisions and Documents Print E-mail This page summarizes the decisions made by the National Climate Assessment Development and Advisory Committee (NCADAC) and the documents the committee has adopted in association with those decisions. The documents and decisions concern the operation of the committee, the content of the synthesis report(s), the sustained assessment process, and other important guidance and responsibilities. The full and official meeting records of the NCADAC are available on a dedicated NOAA page. To view the Federal Register notices announcing the meetings of the NCADAC, please click here.

255

Frequently Requested Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Frequently Requested Documents Frequently Requested Documents Frequently Requested Documents This is an index of frequently requested documents provided by the Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office. You must use the Adobe Acrobat file reader to read the files. If you do not have the reader you can download it free from http://get.adobe.com/reader/. FOIA Requests Received by DOE-ID in 2013 (pdf) April - ID-2013-00854 AMWTP - Charcoal filter breakdown in PAPRs - 600 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon Employee Concern - 135 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon All Hands Feedback - 63 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon AMWTP Employee Concern Ltr 1 - 70 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon RE: Please contact - ITG, about the EC interview (by B&W) - 43 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon RE: Please contact - ITG, about the EC interview (by B&W) - 69 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon

256

Integrated XML Document Management  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

XML has become a widely accepted data format for exchange and representation of semi-structured data. Efficiently managing XML as well as traditional business documents and content in an integrated fashion is a necessity for companies to be successful ...

Hui-I Hsiao; Joshua Hui; Ning Li; Parag Tijare

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

257

WIPP Documents - Other  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Karst and Related Issues at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Dated 62309 Pioneering Nuclear Waste Disposal DOECAO-00-3124, Feb. 2000 Documents the 40-plus year history of...

258

Transportation System Requirements Document  

SciTech Connect

This Transportation System Requirements Document (Trans-SRD) describes the functions to be performed by and the technical requirements for the Transportation System to transport spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) from Purchaser and Producer sites to a Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) site, and between CRWMS sites. The purpose of this document is to define the system-level requirements for Transportation consistent with the CRWMS Requirement Document (CRD). These requirements include design and operations requirements to the extent they impact on the development of the physical segments of Transportation. The document also presents an overall description of Transportation, its functions, its segments, and the requirements allocated to the segments and the system-level interfaces with Transportation. The interface identification and description are published in the CRWMS Interface Specification.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

System specification/system design document comment review: Plutonium Stabilization and Packaging System. Notes of conference  

SciTech Connect

A meeting was held between DOE personnel and the BNFL team to review the proposed resolutions to DOE comments on the initial issue of the system specification and system design document for the Plutonium Stabilization and Packaging System. The objectives of this project are to design, fabricate, install, and start up a glovebox system for the safe repackaging of plutonium oxide and metal, with a requirement of a 50-year storage period. The areas discussed at the meeting were: nitrogen in can; moisture instrumentation; glovebox atmosphere; can marking-bar coding; weld quality; NFPA-101 references; inner can swabbing; ultimate storage environment; throughput; convenience can screw-top design; furnace/trays; authorization basis; compactor safety; schedule for DOE review actions; fire protection; criticality safety; applicable standards; approach to MC and A; homogeneous oxide; resistance welder power; and tray overfill. Revised resolutions were drafted and are presented.

NONE

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

260

HNF-37489-FP Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HNF-37489-FP HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Project Hanford Management Contractor foc the US. Deparbnsnt of Energy under Contract DE-ACO6-96RL13200 FLUOR, P.O. Box 1000 Richland, Washington Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-I 189-2008, Appendix A HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-1189- 2008, Appendix A S. K. Omberg Fluor Government Group Date Published April 2008 To Be Presented at The Nuclear Renaissanm. Safety Analysls for the New Nuclear Age Energy Facility Contractow Group May 3 - 8,2008 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Pmject Hanford Management CcntractOr for the US. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC0696RL132W FLUOR, P.O. Box I000

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

ADR Revised Policy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Revised Policy Statement. SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and other collaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts.

262

CRADA Order Revision  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CRADA Order Revision CRADA Order Revision Linda Field Patent Counsel Department of Energy Goal CRADA Order DOE O 483.1 CRADA Manual DOE M 483.1-1 CRADA Order DOE O XXXX.X Departmental Directive Program Types of Directives Policies Regulations Orders Notices Manuals Guides Technical Standards Departmental Directive Program Directives Life Cycle Development Coordination Implementation Review (Certification) Development Phase *Orders are uploaded to RevCom for review and comment by all affected parties *60 days to develop draft & submit to MA-90 *Solicits input from stakeholders ( incl. field, contractors, and/or program counsel) Coordination Phase *MA-90 parses directive & sets due dates for review & comment *HQ Directives Points of Contact (DPCs) *Have 45 days to submit official comments on behalf of their

263

INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION (DRAFT)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADBs Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Royal Government of Bhutan Asian Development Bank

I. Executive Summary

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

264

Hanford Site National Evnironmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 4  

SciTech Connect

This fourth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. In Chapter 4.0 are presented summations of up-to-date information about climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels. Chapter 5.0 describes models, including their principal assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclides transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable for environmental impact statements for the Hanford Site, following the structure Chapter 4.0. NO conclusions or recommendations are given in this report.

Cushing, C.E. [ed.

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

265

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization, Revision 15  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site environment. It is updated each year and is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site environment for the many National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents being prepared by DOE contractors. No statements of significance or environmental consequences are provided. This year's report is the thirteenth revision of the original document published in 1988 and is (until replaced by the fourteenth revision) the only version that is relevant for use in the preparation of Hanford NEPA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) documents. The two chapters included in this document (Chapters 4 and 6) are numbered to correspond to the chapters where such information is typically presented in environmental impact statements (Weiss) and other Hanford Site NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes Hanford Site climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological, and historical resources, socioeconomics, occupational safety, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) describes federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and presidential executive orders that are applicable to the NEPA documents prepared for Hanford Site activities.

Neitzel, Duane A.; Bunn, Amoret L.; Burk, Kenneth W.; Cannon, Sandra D.; Duncan, Joanne P.; Fowler, Richard A.; Fritz, Brad G.; Harvey, David W.; Hendrickson, Paul L.; Horton, Duane G.; Last, George V.; Poston, Ted M.; Prendergast-Kennedy, Ellen L.; Reidel, Steve P.; Scott, Michael J.; Thorne, Paul D.; Woody, Dave M.

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

266

Microsoft Word - Document2  

Buildings Energy Data Book (EERE)

09 09 D I S C L A I M E R This document was designed for the internal use of the United States Department of Energy. This document will be occasionally updated and, therefore, this copy may not reflect the most current version. This document was prepared as account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by

267

documentation | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

documentation documentation Dataset Summary Description (Abstract): The Kenya Country Report describes the energy situation in Kenys and identifies solar and wind energy opportunities. (Purpose): To influence investment decisions by promoting and supporting renewable energy by overcoming informational barriers in solar and wind energy financing. Source Daniel Theuri - SWERA National Team Date Released November 23rd, 2008 (5 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords documentation Kenya renewable energy solar SWERA UNEP wind Data application/pdf icon Download Report (pdf, 9.3 MiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Time Period 2008 License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) Comment Rate this dataset

268

Document clustering methods, document cluster label disambiguation methods, document clustering apparatuses, and articles of manufacture  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

Document clustering methods, document cluster label disambiguation methods, document clustering apparatuses, and articles of manufacture are described. In one aspect, a document clustering method includes providing a document set comprising a plurality of documents, providing a cluster comprising a subset of the documents of the document set, using a plurality of terms of the documents, providing a cluster label indicative of subject matter content of the documents of the cluster, wherein the cluster label comprises a plurality of word senses, and selecting one of the word senses of the cluster label.

Sanfilippo, Antonio (Richland, WA); Calapristi, Augustin J. (West Richland, WA); Crow, Vernon L. (Richland, WA); Hetzler, Elizabeth G. (Kennewick, WA); Turner, Alan E. (Kennewick, WA)

2009-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

269

UESC Enabling Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Innovation for Our Energy Future Innovation for Our Energy Future Karen Thomas National Renewable Energy Laboratory Biloxi, Mississippi May 6, 2009 Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents 2009 Interim Update FEMP's UESC Enabling Documents Details: Legislation and Executive actions Legal opinions Agency guidance ...and more www.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/28792.pdf National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future PURPOSE * Designed to assist federal agency and utility staff involved in administering utility energy service projects * Clearly show that federal agencies have the authority to enter

270

Appendix G Supporting Documentation  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Supporting Documentation Supporting Documentation for Focused Feasibility Study This page intentionally left blank Contents Section Ground Water Models for Alternatives 3 and 4 ........................................................................ G .O Human Health Risk Assessment Calculations ........................................................................... G2.0 Cost Analysis ........................................................................................................................... G3.0 This page intentionally left blank Section G1.0 Ground Water Models for Alternatives 3 and 4 This page intentionally left blank D o c o l ~ ~ e n t Nurt~her Q0029500 Appendix G MMTS OU 111 Feasibility Study Ground Water Modeling for Alternative 3: PRB Treatment Objective

271

Automatic Document Orientation Detection and Categorization through Document Vectorization  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Automatic Document Orientation Detection and Categorization through Document Vectorization Shijian, Kent Ridge, 117543 {lusj, tancl@comp.nus.edu.sg} ABSTRACT This paper presents an automatic orientation carry out orientation detection and cate- gorization through document vectorization, which encodes

Tan, Chew Lim

272

EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Record of Decision Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project This notice announces the availability of the Revised ROD to offer contract terms for an optional electrical interconnection of the proposed Summit/Westward Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System at a point near the existing Wauna Substation of the Clatskanie People's Utility District (CPUD), Columbia County, Oregon. EIS-0183; Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision for the Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project (October 2004) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Record of Decision EIS-0349: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision

273

EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision 183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project This notice announces the availability of the Revised ROD to offer contract terms for an optional electrical interconnection of the proposed Summit/Westward Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System at a point near the existing Wauna Substation of the Clatskanie People's Utility District (CPUD), Columbia County, Oregon. EIS-0183; Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision for the Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project (October 2004) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Record of Decision

274

Why inverse document frequency?  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Inverse Document Frequency (IDF) is a popular measure of a word's importance. The IDF invariably appears in a host of heuristic measures used in information retrieval. However, so far the IDF has itself been a heuristic. In this paper, we show IDF to ...

Kishore Papineni

2001-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

PETSc: Documentation: Changes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Changes Home Download Features Documentation Manual pages and Users Manual Referencing PETSc Tutorials Installation AMS Changes dev 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0.0 2.3.3 2.3.2 2.3.1 2.3.0...

276

Computer-aided documentation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Current standards for high-quality documentation of complex computer systems include many criteria, based on the application and user levels. Important points common to many systems are: targeting to specific user groups; being complete, concise, and structured; containing both tutorials and reference material; being field-tested; and being timely in appearance relative to the software delivery. To achieve these goals, uniform quality standards should be more vigorously applied, the documentation development cycle should be shortened, more documentation/software help should be available on line, and more user interaction should be solicited. For future computer systems, the proposal is made that the documentation be machine comprehensible. This should be phased in, with the immediate goal being to facilitate user querying for information, and with an ultimate goal of providing a database for programmer apprentice artificial-intelligence programs that assist software development. This new functionality will be the result of several trends, including the drastically reduced cost of read-only online random-access storage via video optical disks, the ongoing successes of artificial-intelligence programs when applied to limited application areas, and the ever increasing cost of software programmers. 3 references.

Rosenberg, S.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

277

ENERGY REVIEW Consultation Document  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENERGY REVIEW Consultation Document JANUARY 2006 Our Energy Challenge Securing clean, affordable energy for the long-term #12;Our Energy Challenge Securing clean, affordable energy for the long term #12;OUR ENERGY CHALLENGE ­ SECURING CLEAN, AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR THE LONG TERM ii Why is the government

278

Defining computer documentation audiences  

SciTech Connect

The paper is intended to enlighten technical writers in the computer field to the importance of defining their audiences. Observations are made about audiences in general, realms of experience, levels of usage, numbers of documents, grouping audiences and writing for specific audiences.

Tanner, R.D.

1976-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

279

Characterizing Web Document Change  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The World Wide Web is growing and changing at an astonishing rate. For the information in the web to be useful, web information systems such as search engines have to keep up with the growth and change of the web. In this paper we study how web documents ...

Lipyeow Lim; Min Wang; Sriram Padmanabhan; Jeffrey Scott Vitter; Ramesh C. Agarwal

2001-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Intitial Release ISDF-010, After Action Report Revision History:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

405 405 Intitial Release ISDF-010, After Action Report Revision History: Rev. Description of Change Parent Document: Notify of Changes: ISDP-002, Training Production Process EOTA Employees Referenced Documents: Document Owner: Approvers: Mary McLane Melissa Otero Backup Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Company - Business Form Insert Logo Here Document Title: After Action Report Calculation Template Document Number: ISDF-048, After Action Report Caluclation Template Rev 11_0405 NAME OF COURSE Course Dates: Years of Experience in Emergency Operations/Response XX students in the course; only received XX surveys Highest Level of Education DOE/NNSA Federal Employee: 0 0.00% High School/equivalent: 0 0.00% DOE/NNSA Contractor: 0 0.00% Some College: 0 0.00% Other: 0 0.00% Undergraduate: 0 0.00% Total Responses:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Clemson University Standard Terms of Purchase Revision B Effective April 1, 2011  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Clemson University Standard Terms of Purchase ­ Revision B Effective April 1, 2011 This document contains standard terms and conditions that apply to all solicitations and procurements made by Clemson University. Any Supplier terms and conditions included with Supplier's invoice or any other document provided

Stuart, Steven J.

282

Development of Onsite Transportation Safety Documents for Nevada Test Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Department of Energy (DOE) Orders require each DOE site to develop onsite transportation safety documents (OTSDs). The Nevada Test Site approach divided all onsite transfers into two groups with each group covered by a standalone OTSD identified as Non-Nuclear and Nuclear. The Non-Nuclear transfers involve all radioactive hazardous material in less than Hazard Category (HC)-3 quantities and all chemically hazardous materials. The Nuclear transfers involve all radioactive material equal to or greater than HC-3 quantities and radioactive material mated with high explosives regardless of quantity. Both OTSDs comply with DOE O 460.1B requirements. The Nuclear OTSD also complies with DOE O 461.1A requirements and includes a DOE-STD-3009 approach to hazard analysis (HA) and accident analysis as needed. All Nuclear OTSD proposed transfers were determined to be non-equivalent and a methodology was developed to determine if equivalent safety to a fully compliant Department of Transportation (DOT) transfer was achieved. For each HA scenario, three hypothetical transfers were evaluated: a DOT-compliant, uncontrolled, and controlled transfer. Equivalent safety is demonstrated when the risk level for each controlled transfer is equal to or less than the corresponding DOT-compliant transfer risk level. In this comparison the typical DOE-STD-3009 risk matrix was modified to reflect transportation requirements. Design basis conditions (DBCs) were developed for each non-equivalent transfer. Initial DBCs were based solely upon the amount of material present. Route-, transfer-, and site-specific conditions were evaluated and the initial DBCs revised as needed. Final DBCs were evaluated for each transfers packaging and its contents.

Frank Hand, Willard Thomas, Frank Sciacca, Manny Negrete, Susan Kelley

2008-05-08T23:59:59.000Z

283

Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tracking Document for Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) 4/17/2013 In the time since Revision 02 of the DOE Challenge Home National Program Requirements was released, DOE has modified, clarified, and refined various aspects of the program documents, primarily in response to partner questions and comments. This document is a summary of these edits, organized by the section of the National Program Requirements in which they appear. DOE has also posted the revised National Program Requirements, labeled Rev. 03, on its Web site at www.buildings.energy.gov/challenge. All revisions are categorized as a Change, Clarification, or Refinement. These are defined as follows: Change - The addition, deletion, or modification of a program requirement. A change will typically result from a partner

284

Coal Data Publication Revision Policy  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

THEN Survey Manager determines impact: WHAT happens next to the database and in our coal reports: Respondent provides data that are clearly incorrect or revised data for any...

285

EPA Revises Emissions Estimation Methodology  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

The changes to the historical emission estimates are the result of revisions to the data and estimation ... b K.D . Smythe, RAND ... RAND Environmental Science and ...

286

Efficiently Clustering Documents with Committees  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Abstract. The general goal of clustering is to group data elements such that the intragroup similarities are high and the inter-group similarities are low. We present a clustering algorithm called CBC (Clustering By Committee) that is shown to produce higher quality clusters in document clustering tasks as compared to several well known clustering algorithms. It initially discovers a set of tight clusters (high intra-group similarity), called committees, that are well scattered in the similarity space (low inter-group similarity). The union of the committees is but a subset of all elements. The algorithm proceeds by assigning elements to their most similar committee. Evaluating cluster quality has always been a difficult task. We present a new evaluation methodology based on the editing distance between output clusters and manually constructed classes (the answer key). This evaluation measure is more intuitive and easier to interpret than previous evaluation measures. 1

Patrick Pantel; Dekang Lin

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

287

Selection of 3013 containers for field surveillance: LA-14310, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This document is the fifth in a series of reports that document the binning, statistical sampling, and sample selection of 3013 containers for field surveillance. 1,2,3,39 Revisions to binning assignments documented in this report are primarily a result of new prompt gamma data. This report also documents changes to the random sample specification resulting from these binning changes and identifies and provides the rationale for the engineering judgment sample items for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 and 2009. This revision also updates the changes to the previous surveillance sample resulting from changes to the order that specific containers undergo surveillance. This report will continue to be reviewed regularly and revised as needed to meet the requirements of the surveillance program.

Peppers, Larry; Kelly, Elizabeth; McClard, James; Friday, Gary; Venetz, Theodore; Stakebake, Jerry

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

Latest Documents and Notices  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

latest-documents-notices Office of National latest-documents-notices Office of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Policy and Compliance 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585 202-586-4600 en EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0488-epa-notice-availability-draft-environmental-impact-statement EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement

289

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview The steps for authorization of your experiment are described below. The ALS Experiment Coordinators are available to support you through this process. Please This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at any stage if you have questions or need more information. Prior to Your Arrival at the ALS 1. Complete or Update and Experiment Safety Sheet If you did not submit a General User Proposal, you must submit an ESS one month prior to arrival at the ALS. 2. Biological, Radioactive, Hazardous, and Electrical Materials, and Lasers If your experiment involves the use of any of the above materials-no matter how small the quantities are or how innocuous the sample may be-additional authorization may be required. Please submit your ESS early and clearly identify your materials. Our staff will assess the hazards and contact you about any necessary supplementary documentation.

290

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview The steps for authorization of your experiment are described below. The ALS Experiment Coordinators are available to support you through this process. Please This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at any stage if you have questions or need more information. Prior to Your Arrival at the ALS 1. Complete or Update and Experiment Safety Sheet If you did not submit a General User Proposal, you must submit an ESS one month prior to arrival at the ALS. 2. Biological, Radioactive, Hazardous, and Electrical Materials, and Lasers If your experiment involves the use of any of the above materials-no matter how small the quantities are or how innocuous the sample may be-additional authorization may be required. Please submit your ESS early and clearly identify your materials. Our staff will assess the hazards and contact you about any necessary supplementary documentation.

291

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview The steps for authorization of your experiment are described below. The ALS Experiment Coordinators are available to support you through this process. Please This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at any stage if you have questions or need more information. Prior to Your Arrival at the ALS 1. Complete or Update and Experiment Safety Sheet If you did not submit a General User Proposal, you must submit an ESS one month prior to arrival at the ALS. 2. Biological, Radioactive, Hazardous, and Electrical Materials, and Lasers If your experiment involves the use of any of the above materials-no matter how small the quantities are or how innocuous the sample may be-additional authorization may be required. Please submit your ESS early and clearly identify your materials. Our staff will assess the hazards and contact you about any necessary supplementary documentation.

292

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview The steps for authorization of your experiment are described below. The ALS Experiment Coordinators are available to support you through this process. Please This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at any stage if you have questions or need more information. Prior to Your Arrival at the ALS 1. Complete or Update and Experiment Safety Sheet If you did not submit a General User Proposal, you must submit an ESS one month prior to arrival at the ALS. 2. Biological, Radioactive, Hazardous, and Electrical Materials, and Lasers If your experiment involves the use of any of the above materials-no matter how small the quantities are or how innocuous the sample may be-additional authorization may be required. Please submit your ESS early and clearly identify your materials. Our staff will assess the hazards and contact you about any necessary supplementary documentation.

293

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Content includes EERE subject matter and mentions DOE's role in rebuilding. The layout is designed to be used as a template for other cities in similar situations. 45086.pdf More Documents & Publications A Tale of Two Cities: Greensburg Rebuilds as a National Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) NREL Helps Greensburg Set the Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Innovation: The Spectrum of Clean Energy Innovation, NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Greensburg, Kansas: Building a Model Green Community, How Would You Rebuild a Town - Green? April 2009 (Brochure)

294

Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: SSAB Members (J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, P. Claire, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters) The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance and direction for restructuring and managing the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards procurement mechanisms that support activities of the Boards. Roberson Memorandum - July 7, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

295

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) 20-page "how-to" guide describing ways to turn a disaster into an opportunity to rebuild with greener energy technologies. It covers such topics as the importance of energy, options for communities, instructions for developing an energy plan, and other considerations. This guide is intended for the community leaders who have experienced a disaster. 45136.pdf More Documents & Publications Greensburg Webinars Q&A From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE

296

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) 20-page "how-to" guide describing ways to turn a disaster into an opportunity to rebuild with greener energy technologies. It covers such topics as the importance of energy, options for communities, instructions for developing an energy plan, and other considerations. This guide is intended for the community leaders who have experienced a disaster. 45136.pdf More Documents & Publications From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE

297

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Content includes EERE subject matter and mentions DOE's role in rebuilding. The layout is designed to be used as a template for other cities in similar situations. 45086.pdf More Documents & Publications NREL Helps Greensburg Set the Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Innovation: The Spectrum of Clean Energy Innovation, NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) A Tale of Two Cities: Greensburg Rebuilds as a National Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Greensburg, Kansas: Building a Model Green Community, How Would You Rebuild a Town - Green? April 2009 (Brochure)

298

EIS-0218: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision of the Record of Decision for a Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Revision of the Record of Decision for a Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel DOE has decided to extend the FRR SNF Acceptance Policy for an additional 10 years beyond its current expiration until May 12, 2016, for irradiation of eligible fuel, and until May 12, 2019, for fuel acceptance. DOE has also decided to include the Australian RRR as a reactor eligible to participate in the acceptance program. For the small amount of RRR fuel that would be added to 1996 estimates, DOE will continue limitations on shipment cask curie activity and will ensure that the upper limit estimate for the source term assumed in the FRR SNF EIS accident analysis will not be exceeded. EIS-0218-RevisedROD-2004.pdf More Documents & Publications

299

SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Control modules -- Volume 1, Revision 4  

SciTech Connect

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. This manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for the functional module documentation, and Volume 3 for the documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

Landers, N.F.; Petrie, L.M.; Knight, J.R. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)] [and others

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

300

REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates for 1964-1965 and verification of the 1963 predictions October 1964 Report of the FEDERAL RADIATION COUNCIL #12;REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates - #12;SUMMARY On the basis of information available in June 1964, new estimates of the levels of fallout

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Recent Revisions to PVWATTS  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

PVWATTS is an Internet-accessible software program that allows the user to easily calculate the energy production and cost savings for grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems located throughout the United States. To ensure that PVWATTS continues to meet its users' needs, an online survey form was provided to users to identify areas for improvement. The results of the survey were used to prioritize improvements to PVWATTS in FY2005. PVWATTS was revised by changing the PV system specification input for system size from an AC power rating to a nameplate DC power rating; adding an input for an overall DC to AC derate factor; updating the residential electric rates; adding monthly and yearly solar radiation values for the PV array; and simplifying the user interface for Version 2.

Marion, B.; Anderberg, M.; Gray-Hann, P.

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 2, 2007 November 2, 2007 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) is pleased to announce the release of the 2008 Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). This revision replaces the 2005 MERRTT CD-ROM set. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, the 2008 MERRTT has been sent to the Occupational, Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for review. The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students'

303

Forecast Technical Document Technical Glossary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Forecast Technical Document Technical Glossary A document defining some of the terms used in the 2011 Production Forecast technical documentation. Tom Jenkins Robert Matthews Ewan Mackie Lesley in the Forecast documentation. In some cases, the terms and the descriptions are "industry standard", in others

304

Development of an energy-use estimation methodology for the revised Navy Manual MO-303  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Navy commissioned Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) to revise and/or update the Navy Utilities Targets Manual, NAVFAC MO-303 (U.S. Navy 1972b). The purpose of the project was to produce a current, applicable, and easy-to-use version of the manual for use by energy and facility engineers and staff at all Navy Public Works Centers (PWCs), Public Works Departments (PWDs), Engineering Field Divisions (EFDs), and other related organizations. The revision of the MO-303 manual involved developing a methodology for estimating energy consumption in buildings and ships. This methodology can account for, and equitably allocate, energy consumption within Navy installations. The analyses used to develop this methodology included developing end-use intensities (EUIs) from a vast collection of Navy base metering and billing data. A statistical analysis of the metering data, weather data, and building energy-use characteristics was used to develop appropriate EUI values for use at all Navy bases. A complete Navy base energy reconciliation process was also created for use in allocating all known energy consumption. Initial attempts to use total Navy base consumption values did not produce usable results. A parallel effort using individual building consumption data provided an estimating method that incorporated weather effects. This method produced a set of building EUI values and weather adjustments for use in estimating building energy use. A method of reconciling total site energy consumption was developed based on a {open_quotes}zero-sum{close_quotes} principle. This method provides a way to account for all energy use and apportion part or all of it to buildings and other energy uses when actual consumption is not known. The entire text of the manual was also revised to present a more easily read understood and usable document.

Richman, E.E.; Keller, J.M.; Wood, A.G.; Dittmer, A.L.

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

2013-2014 Additions and Revisions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The 2013 2014 Additions and Revisions are now available with seven new methods, including three for testing 3-MCPD, and revisions to 25 previously approved methods. 2013-2014 Additions and Revisions Hardback Books Methods - Analyses Books Methods - An

306

Document Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Document Reviews Document Reviews Document Reviews The Office of Document Reviews, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security information and document declassification efforts promote the release of information needed by an informed citizenry to understand and oversee the actions of its Government. To meet our mission requirements, the Office of Document Reviews: Conducts pre-publication reviews of documents generated in classified subject areas at Headquarters that are to be released to the public. Conducts document reviews for other HSS and Headquarters organizations to identify classified and controlled unclassified information. Reviews classified documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act for the Department and denies the release of the document in total or provides a redacted copy for release to the requester.

307

Policy and Guidance Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis HS-20 Home Mission & Functions » Office of Nuclear Safety, Quality Assurance & Environment » Sustainability Support » Environmental Policy & Assistance » Corporate Safety Programs » Analysis Program Contacts What's New? Sustainability Support Environment Corporate Safety Programs Analysis Environment Environmental Policy Environmental Guidance Environmental Reports Environmental Management System Radiation Protection Environmental Compliance Environmental Justice Environmental Training Environmental Tools Search Our Documents Topics & Resources Air Analytical Services Program CERCLA Cultural & Natural Resources DOE Comments on Rulemakings Federal Environmental Laws

308

SSC Safety Review Document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The safety strategy of the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) Central Design Group (CDG) is to mitigate potential hazards to personnel, as far as possible, through appropriate measures in the design and engineering of the facility. The Safety Review Document identifies, on the basis of the Conceptual Design Report (CDR) and related studies, potential hazards inherent in the SSC project independent of its site. Mitigative measures in the design of facilities and in the structuring of laboratory operations are described for each of the hazards identified.

Toohig, T.E. [ed.

1988-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

309

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 9  

SciTech Connect

This ninth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Chapters 4 and 6 in Hanford Site-related NEPA documents. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) includes information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological and historical resources, socioeconomics, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE directives and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site. Not all of the sections have been updated for this revision. The following lists the updated sections: climate and meteorology; ecology (threatened and endangered species section only); culture, archaeological, and historical resources; socioeconomics; all of Chapter 6.

Neitzel, D.A. [ed.] [ed.; Bjornstad, B.N.; Fosmire, C.J. [and others] [and others

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

SURFACE INDUSTRIAL HVAC SYSTEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this system description document (SDD) is to establish requirements that drive the design of the surface industrial heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) system and its bases to allow the design effort to proceed to license application. This SDD will be revised at strategic points as the design matures. This SDD identifies the requirements and describes the system design, as it currently exists, with emphasis on attributes of the design provided to meet the requirements. This SDD is an engineering tool for design control; accordingly, the primary audience and users are design engineers. This SDD is part of an iterative design process. It leads the design process with regard to the flowdown of upper tier requirements onto the system. Knowledge of these requirements is essential to performing the design process. The SDD follows the design with regard to the description of the system. The description that provided in this SDD reflects the current results of the design process.

M.M. Ansari

2005-04-05T23:59:59.000Z

311

Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10/18/2013 10/18/2013 Vehicle Setup Information Downloadable Dynamometer Database (D 3 )- Test Summary Sheet Vehicle Architecture Conventional Vehicle Dynamometer Input 2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI Test Cell Location Front Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date 10/18/2013 Revision Number 1 Vehicle Dynamometer Input Test weight [lb] 3516 Test Fuel Information Revision Number 1 Notes: Test weight [lb] Target A [lb] 3516 30.1456 Target B [lb/mph] Target C [lb/mph^2] 0.37653 0.015662 Test Fuel Information Fuel type 2007 Certification Diesel HF0583 Fuel density [g/ml] Fuel Net HV [BTU/lbm] 0.855 18355 Fuel type 2007 Certification Diesel HF0583 T e s t I D [ # ] C y c l e C o l d s t a r t ( C S t ) H o t s t a r t [ H S t ] D a t e T e s t C e l l T e m p [ C ] T e s t C e l l R H [ % ] T e s t C e l l B a r o [ i n / H g ] V e h i c l e c o o l i n g f a n s p e e d : S p e e d M a t

312

Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7/30/2013 7/30/2013 Vehicle Setup Information Downloadable Dynamometer Database (D 3 )- Test Summary Sheet Vehicle Architecture Alt Fuel- CNG Vehicle Dynamometer Input 2012 Honda Civic GX Test Cell Location Front Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date 7/30/2013 Revision Number 1 Vehicle Dynamometer Input Test weight [lb] 3192 Test Fuel Information MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Revision Number 1 Notes: Test weight [lb] Target A [lb] 3192 22.2037 Target B [lb/mph] Target C [lb/mph^2] 0.45855 0.01263 Test Fuel Information MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Fuel type Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Fuel density [g/ml] Fuel Net HV [BTU/lbm] 0.5872 905.3 Fuel type Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) T e s t I D [ # ] C y c l e C o l d s t a r t ( C S t ) H o t s t a r t

313

EIA model documentation: Electricity market module - electricity fuel dispatch  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the National Energy Modeling System Electricity Fuel Dispatch Submodule (EFD), a submodule of the Electricity Market Module (EMM) as it was used for EIA`s Annual Energy Outlook 1997. It replaces previous documentation dated March 1994 and subsequent yearly update revisions. The report catalogues and describes the model assumptions, computational methodology, parameter estimation techniques, model source code, and forecast results generated through the synthesis and scenario development based on these components. This document serves four purposes. First, it is a reference document providing a detailed description of the model for reviewers and potential users of the EFD including energy experts at the Energy Information Administration (EIA), other Federal agencies, state energy agencies, private firms such as utilities and consulting firms, and non-profit groups such as consumer and environmental groups. Second, this report meets the legal requirement of the Energy Information Administration (EIA) to provide adequate documentation in support of its statistical and forecast reports. Third, it facilitates continuity in model development by providing documentation which details model enhancements that were undertaken for AE097 and since the previous documentation. Last, because the major use of the EFD is to develop forecasts, this documentation explains the calculations, major inputs and assumptions which were used to generate the AE097.

NONE

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

314

Topical Report on Reactivity Initiated Accident: Bases for RIA Fuel and Core Coolability Criteria  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Revised acceptance criteria have been developed for the response of light water reactor (LWR) fuel under reactivity initiated accidents (RIA). Development of these revisions is part of an industry effort to extend burnup levels beyond currently licensed limits. The revised criteria are proposed for use in licensing burnup extensions or new fuel designs.

2002-05-22T23:59:59.000Z

315

Latest Documents and Notices | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2011 1, 2011 EA-1793: Final Environmental Assessment Replacement Capability for Disposal of Remote-Handled Low-Level Radioactive Waste Generated at the Department of Energy's Idaho Site December 20, 2011 EA-1851: Finding of No Significant Impact Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application (December 2011) December 20, 2011 EA-1851: Final Environmental Assessment Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application (December 2011) December 20, 2011 EIS-0439: Record of Decision Rice Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, CA December 19, 2011 EA-1919: Notice of Revision to Clearance Policy Recycle of Scrap Metals Originating from Radiological Areas (December 2011)

316

Building Technologies Office: Standards Development and Revision  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Revision to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Standards Development and Revision on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Standards Development...

317

Guidelines for Electromagnetic Interference Testing in Power Plants: Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Concern about the effect of electromagnetic emissions on the safe, reliable operation of digital equipment has resulted in requirements for utilities to create detailed emissions maps. This guide identifies emissions sources in nuclear power plants, recommends susceptibility and emissions standards, and details design and layout practices for minimizing susceptibility to electromagnetic interference (EMI). Revision 1 reflects modifications to the original document, which received NRC approval in a Safety...

1997-04-16T23:59:59.000Z

318

Fig 9-revised Flowchart.xls  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

9 9 Soil Nature and Extent AOI Identification Process d The PRG value for lead is not a calculated PRG, but rather is taken from the EPA guidance document Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Correction Action Facilities (1994). e For surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft), WRW surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft) PRGs are used. For subsurface soil (0.5 ft to a maximum depth of 209 ft), WRW subsurface soil (0.5 to 8 ft) PRGs are used. a Soil "superset" for soil samples collected from June 28, 1991 through August 22, 2005. c Soil PRGs are defined as 1 x 10 -6 WRW PRGs based on using an HI of 0.1 or a risk of 1 x 10 -6 (the more conservative of the two values was used for the PRG). b Background level is defined as the background M2SD. RI-Ready Soil Data

319

PETSc: Documentation: FAQ  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FAQ FAQ Home Download Features Documentation Manual pages and Users Manual Citing PETSc Tutorials Installation SAWs Changes Bug Reporting Code Management FAQ License Linear Solver Table Applications/Publications Miscellaneous External Software Developers Site General How can I subscribe to the PETSc mailing lists? Any useful books on numerical computing? What kind of parallel computers or clusters are needed to use PETSc? What kind of license is PETSc released under? Why is PETSc programmed in C, instead of Fortran or C++? Does all the PETSc error checking and logging reduce PETSc's efficiency? How do such a small group of people manage to write and maintain such a large and marvelous package as PETSc? For complex numbers will I get better performance using C or C++? How come when I run the same program on the same number of processes

320

Preliminary Safety Assessment Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LCSAD-001, Ver. 2 LCSAD-001, Ver. 2 Linac Commissioning Safety Assessment Document for the National Synchrotron Light Source II Photon Sciences Directorate Version 2 May 11, 2011 Prepared by Brookhaven National Laboratory P.O. Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973-5000 managed by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Basic Energy Science under contract DE-AC02-98CD10886 ii National Synchrotron Light Source II ii LT-C-ESH-LCSAD-001 ii DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Microsoft Word - Document1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Greg Coulter [mailto:greg.coulter405@gmail.com] Greg Coulter [mailto:greg.coulter405@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 4:13 PM To: Barhydt, Laura Cc: Armstrong, Ashley; Leon Chapa Ismael Ricardo (GE Infra Energy Subject: GE-Prolec CCE Meeting October 19,2010 Ms. Barhydt, This e-mail documents the GE-Prolec CCE meeting of October 19, 2010 concerning Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014. Mr. Ismael Leon and myself met with Ms. Ashley Armstrong, Ms. Celia Sher, Ms. Stephanie Weiner, and Ms. Laura Barhydt in your offices and discussed the attached charts concerning this NOPR. We appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and share a dialogue on the existing rule and changes outlined in the latest NOPR. You had specifically asked us to provide additional comments on our Issue #1. After further review, we continue to believe that the variety in

322

Enron Documents 1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET IMPORTANT ES NUMBER: ES95-000672 EXTERNAL 'E OF DOC: 01/10/95 REC'D: 01/13/95 CONTROLLED: 01/13/95 DUE: FROM: HILLINGS,E JOSEPH DC O NOTES AREA: ENRON WASHINGTON, INC. SUBJECT ENCLOSES MOST RECENT ISSUE OF SUMMARY: "ENRON BUSINESS" SOURCE: PUBLIC MAIL DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER ADDRESSED TO: SECRETARY FOR SIGNATURE OF: ACTION TO: POLICY ACTION TYPE: For your information ACTION OFFICER: ~~~~~~~NCURRENCE COPIES TO: NCURRENCE COPIES TO: -- FORMATION COPIES TO: ES1 TM2 CURRENCES COMPLETED: :MARKS: :ECUTIVE SECRETARIAT CONTACT: Joyce Harrod 6-5131 --------------------------- EXEC SEC INTERNAL PSE ------------- SUBJECT CROSS REF: SPECIAL INT. CODE: SLATED CODE/NUMBER: SPECIAL INT. DATE:

323

Preliminary Safety Assessment Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

BCSAD-001 BCSAD-001 Photon Sciences Directorate Booster Commissioning Safety Assessment Document For the National Synchrotron Light Source II Version 2 December 8, 2011 Prepared by Brookhaven National Laboratory P.O. Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973-5000 managed by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Basic Energy Science under contract DE-AC02-98CD10886 ii National Synchrotron Light Source II Photon Sciences Directorate ii DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any

324

Document classification utilising ontologies and relations between documents  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Two major types of relational information can be utilized in automatic document classification as background information: relations between terms, such as ontologies, and relations between documents, such as web links or citations in articles. We introduce ... Keywords: document classification, ontologies, relational models

Katariina Nyberg; Tapani Raiko; Teemu Tiinanen; Eero Hyvnen

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

325

XTRACT: Learning Document Type Descriptors from XML Document Collections  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

XML is rapidly emerging as the new standard for data representation and exchange on the Web. Unlike HTML, tags in XML documents describe the semantics of the data and not how it is to be displayed. In addition, an XML document can be accompanied by a ... Keywords: Document Type Descriptor (DTD), Extensible Markup Language (XML), MDL principle, regular expressions

Minos Garofalakis; Aristides Gionis; Rajeev Rastogi; S. Seshadri; Kyuseok Shim

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

326

Reference: Revised Tariff Sheet  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Company (TrAILCo), a revised tariff sheet to correct the FERC Form No. 1 line reference in TrAILCos formula rate. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the Director, Division of Electric Power Regulation- East, under 18 C.F.R. 375.307, your submittal filed in the above referenced docket is accepted for filing, effective May 17, 2010, as requested. 1 Notice of the filing was published in the Federal Register, with comments, protests, or interventions due on or before June 3, 2010. No protests or adverse comments were filed. American Municipal Power, Inc. and PJM Interconnection, LLC filed timely motions to intervene. Notices of intervention and unopposed timely filed motions to intervene are granted pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 C.F.R. 385.214). Any opposed or untimely filed motion to intervene is governed by the provisions of Rule 214. This acceptance for filing shall not be construed as constituting approval of any rate, charge, classification or any rule, regulation, or practice affecting such rate or 1

Stephen Angle Esq; Dear Mr. Angle; Jignasa P. Gadani

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

327

EA-1086: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) 6: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) EA-1086: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to issue as a final rulemaking an amended version of 10 CFR Part 835, "Occupational Radiation Protection." The amended version provides nuclear safety requirements that, if violated, provide DOE a basis for assessment of civil and criminal penalties under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 31, 1996 EA-1086: Finding of No Significant Impact Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) August 31, 1996 EA-1086: Final Environmental Assessment Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98)

328

OMB Circular A-76 (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 May 29, 2003 CIRCULAR NO. A-76 (REVISED) TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS SUBJECT: Performance of Commercial Activities 1. Purpose. This circular establishes federal policy for the competition of commercial activities. 2. Supersession. This circular supersedes Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-76 (Revised 1999), August 4, 1983; Circular No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook (Revised 2000), March 1996; Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter 92-1, "Inherently Governmental Functions," September 23, 1992; and OMB Transmittal Memoranda 1 through 25, Performance of Commercial Activities. 3. Authority. Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (31 U.S.C. § 1111); Executive Order 11541; the Office

329

Preference revision via declarative debugging  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Preference criteria are rarely static. Often they are subject to modification and aggregation. The resulting preference criteria may not satisfy the properties of the original ones and must therefore be revised. This paper investigates the problem of ...

Pierangelo DellAcqua; Lus Moniz Pereira

2005-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Cray XC30 User Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Documentation Documentation Cray XC30 User Documentation L Cray XC30 Documentation Search Preferences | Advanced Search Home Browse Books Man Pages Glossary Platforms Cray XC30 Cray XE and Cray XK Cray XT Cray Sonexion Cray X2 Cray X1 Knowledge Base by Category by Date by Platform by Title by User Release Announcements @Twitter Cray XC30 System Documentation This site map also contains legacy documentation. Always consult the latest version of documentation for your site-specific configuration and ask your Cray Customer Service representative for additional guidance on the latest software documents. Getting Started Cray Linux Environment (CLE) Software Release Overview Programming Environment Cray Programming Environments User Guide Cray Compiling Environment (CCE) Cray Fortran Reference Manual

331

Darshan Updated data repository documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Updated data repository documentation June 18th, 2013 The documentation for the public ALCF IO Data Repository has been updated. Please note that there is a new technical report...

332

Optimization Online - ALGORITHM & DOCUMENTATION: MINRES ...  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Jan 12, 2013 ... ALGORITHM & DOCUMENTATION: MINRES-QLP for Singular Symmetric and Hermitian Linear Equations and Least-Squares Problems.

333

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents  

SciTech Connect

As part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program (SRP-UDP), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. The SRP-UDP has been completed and the SRP-Maintenance Program (SRP-MP) is now maintaining this listing. Besides updating previous information, Revision 3 adds approximately 80 citations. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Enforcement Manual, Generic Letters, Inspection Manual, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, Standard Technical Specifications and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Nickolaus, J.R.; Bohlander, K.L.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Cray XC30 User Documentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cray XC30 Cray XC30 Documentation Cray XC30 User Documentation L Cray XC30 Documentation Search Preferences | Advanced Search Home Browse Books Man Pages Glossary Platforms Cray XC30 Cray XE and Cray XK Cray XT Cray Sonexion Cray X2 Cray X1 Knowledge Base by Category by Date by Platform by Title by User Release Announcements @Twitter Cray XC30 System Documentation This site map also contains legacy documentation. Always consult the latest version of documentation for your site-specific configuration and ask your Cray Customer Service representative for additional guidance on the latest software documents. Getting Started Cray Linux Environment (CLE) Software Release Overview Programming Environment Cray Programming Environments User Guide Cray Compiling Environment (CCE) Cray Fortran Reference Manual

335

NEPA Documents | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Documents Documents NEPA Documents To see a list of available NEPA documents by type and sorted by publication date, click on the links below. Documents listed in this section are available to members of the public. To see documents not electronically available to the public see the Secure NEPA Documents page for more information. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Categorical exclusions are categories of actions that DOE has determined, by regulation, do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and for which, therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement normally is required. DOE's categorical exclusions are listed in Appendices A and B to Subpart D of its NEPA regulations,10 CFR Part 1021.

336

WordPerfect Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Motion to Dismiss Name of Case: Gilbert J. Hinojos Date of Filing: April 21, 2003 Case Number: TBZ-0003 This determination will consider a Motion to Dismiss filed by Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies (Honeywell) on April 21, 2003. Honeywell seeks dismissal of the underlying complaint filed by Gilbert J. Hinojos under the Department of Energy's Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. I. Background Mr. Hinojos was employed by Honeywell as a "Material Control Coordinator, Sr." at a DOE facility i n Albuquerque New Mexico. Initially, Mr. Hinojos alleges that he was subject to two acts of retaliation from Honeywell due to his having filed several complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

337

Microsoft Word - Document3  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Research Power Users Symposium II July 12, 1994 Research Power Users Symposium II July 12, 1994 Parallel Plasma Fluid Turbulence Calculations J. N. Leboeuf, B. A. Carreras, L. A. Charlton, J. B. Drake, V. E. Lynch, D. E. Newman, K. L. Sidikman and D. A. Spong Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8071 The study of plasma turbulence and transport is a complex problem of critical importance for fusion- relevant plasmas. To this day, the fluid treatment of plasma dynamics is the best approach to realistic physics at the high resolution required for certain experimentally relevant calculations. Core and edge turbulence in a magnetic fusion device have been modeled using state-of-the-art, nonlinear, three- dimensional, initial-value fluid and gyrofluid codes. Parallel implementation of these models on diverse

338

Microsoft Word - Document3  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Northern New Mexico Northern New Mexico Math and Science Academy 2012 Evaluation Report Submitted by Barbara Trujillo, PhD. barbt@comcast.net Project Evaluation Period: September 2011 - October 2012 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY It's a kind of synthesis, but with some elements that perhaps you wouldn't have expected in advance. I always like that when it happens, when something comes that is more than the sum of its parts. - Evan Parker, British Jazz Musician This report presents findings of the 2011-2012 formative evaluation of the Northern New Mexico Math and Science Academy (MSA), an initiative of the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The primary objective of MSA is to provide high quality professional development (PD) in order to improve the teaching and learning of

339

Microsoft Word - Document4  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2003 6, 2003 National Petroleum Council Washington, DC Remarks by Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham NATIONAL ENERGY PLAN Today is an important day. It marks the second anniversary of President Bush's National Energy Plan. While it may not rise to the level of a federal holiday, for those of us in the Bush Administration, it's a pretty important date. When President Bush took office, he understood the short and long-term energy problems our nation faced. He also understood that we had to forge new approaches to solve old problems. The National Energy Plan did that by providing a bold vision to help ensure our energy future. I'm proud of what we've been able to accomplish in two short years. With exciting programs such as FreedomCar, the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative, and the

340

WordPerfect Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 25, 2003 June 25, 2003 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Initial Agency Decision Name of Petitioner: Elaine M. Blakely Date of Filing: September 30, 2002 Case Number: VBH-0086 This Decision involves a whistleblower complaint that Elaine M. Blakely filed under the Department of Energy's (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. From 1986 to April 2002, Ms. Blakely was employed at the DOE's Fernald, Ohio site, most recently by Fluor Fernald, Inc. (FFI). Ms. Blakely alleges that FFI management retaliated against her for activity protected under the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. I. Background A. The DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program The DOE's Contractor Employee Protection Program was established to safeguard "public and employee

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Miscellaneous -- Volume 3, Revision 4  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice; (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System developments has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. This manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for the functional module documentation, and Volume 3--for the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

Petrie, L.M.; Jordon, W.C. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Edwards, A.L. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)]|[Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States)] [and others

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments DRAFT OMB CIRCULAR A-76 (NOVEMBER 14, 2002) REVIEW COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL COMMENTS: The Department of Energy (DOE) supports the overarching goal of OMB Circular A-76 that agencies should obtain "the best deal to the Taxpayer." We also support revisions to the Circular that "Keep the Process Moving" with the end result being: Faster/Cheaper Competitions; Improved Performance and Measures; Enhanced/Expanded Competition; Fairness; Realizing Significant Savings; and the Redirection of Resources to Mission Critical Requirements. Upon review of the draft Circular, the Department believes the proposed changes to Circular reflect a general improvement over the current version. The Department does, however, have

343

343. Document entitled "Develop "Frontier" Resources to Ensure Future Oil and Na  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3. Document entitled "Develop "Frontier" Resources to Ensure Future Oil and Natural Gas 3. Document entitled "Develop "Frontier" Resources to Ensure Future Oil and Natural Gas Supply," dated March 8, 2001. B-5 Exemption - Information withheld (under Exemption 5) consists of deliberative material reflecting comments, recommendations and revisions of draft documents relating to NEPDG. 2 pages. #4139-4140 Withheld 344. Document entitled "The Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve," dated March 7, 2001. B-5 Exemption - Information withheld (under Exemption 5) consists of deliberative material reflecting comments, recommendations and revisions of draft documents relating to NEPDG. 2 pages. #4141-4142 Withheld 345. Document entitled "The Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve," dated March 8, 2001. B- 5 Exemption -

344

Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711)Revision 3: Update Methodology and Key Revisions  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the human factors engineering (HFE) programs of applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits, operating licenses, standard design certifications, and combined operating licenses. The purpose of these safety reviews is to help ensure that personnel performance and reliability are appropriately supported. Detailed design review procedures and guidance for the evaluations is provided in three key documents: the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711), and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). These documents were last revised in 2007, 2004 and 2002, respectively. The NRC is committed to the periodic update and improvement of the guidance to ensure that it remains a state-of-the-art design evaluation tool. To this end, the NRC is updating its guidance to stay current with recent research on human performance, advances in HFE methods and tools, and new technology being employed in plant and control room design. NUREG-0711 is the first document to be addressed. We present the methodology used to update NUREG-0711 and summarize the main changes made. Finally, we discuss the current status of the update program and the future plans.

OHara J. M.; Higgins, J.; Fleger, S.

2012-07-22T23:59:59.000Z

345

FACILITY WORKER TECHNICAL BASIS DOCUMENT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This technical basis document was developed to support RPP-13033, ''Tank Farms Documented Safety Analysis (DSA). It describes the criteria and methodology for allocating controls to hazardous conditions with significant facility worker (FW) consequence and presents the results of the allocation. The criteria and methodology for identifying controls that address FW safety are in accordance with DOE-STD-3009-94, ''Preparation Guide for US Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses''.

SHULTZ, M.V.

2005-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

346

SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Functional modules F1--F8 -- Volume 2, Part 1, Revision 4  

SciTech Connect

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. The manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation; Volume 2--for functional module documentation; and Volume 3--for documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

Greene, N.M.; Petrie, L.M.; Westfall, R.M.; Bucholz, J.A.; Hermann, O.W.; Fraley, S.K. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised) (Fact Sheet) From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised) (Fact Sheet) These Greensburg fact sheet sheets help citizens understand what they can do as a part of the focus. Saving energy & water, using renewable energy (particular interest in small wind), driving "green", general sustainability, & living green. 45138.pdf More Documents & Publications From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE (Fact Sheet) Rebuilding Greensburg, Kansas, as a Model Green Community: A Case Study; NREL's Technical Assistance to Greensburg, June 2007-May 2009 From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding with Renewable Energy after Disaster,

348

Management Earnings Forecasts and Value of Analyst Forecast Revisions  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Prior studies evaluate the relative importance of the sources of value that financial analysts bring to the market based on the price impact of forecast revisions over the event time. We find that management earnings forecasts influence the timing and precision of analyst forecasts. More importantly, evidence suggests that prior studies finding of weaker (stronger) stock-price responses to forecast revisions in the period immediately after (before) the prior-quarter earnings announcement is likely to be the artifact of a temporal pattern of management earnings forecasts over the event time. To the extent that management earnings forecasts are public disclosures, our results suggest that the relative importance of analysts ' information discovery role documented in prior studies is likely to be overstated.

Yongtae Kim; Minsup Song

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial 8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Attached is Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Richard Bonnell of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division at (202) 287-1747 or at richard.bonnell@hq.doe.gov. Flash 2013-38 Revisions to the Merit Review Guide 2013.pdf Merit Review Guide FINAL JULY 2013 ATTACHMENT 1 Sample Merit Rev Panel Appt Letter 1-10.docx ATTACHMENT 2 Sample COI ADDED WB LANGUAGE JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 3 - Sample Evaluation and Selection Plan JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 4 Sample Noncompetitive Review Plan.docx ATTACHMENT 5 Sample Initial Compliance Review 1-16.docx

350

Facility worker technical basis document  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the technical basis for facility worker safety to support the Tank Farms Documented Safety Analysis and described the criteria and methodology for allocating controls to hazardous conditions with significant facility worker consequences and presents the results of the allocation.

EVANS, C.B.

2003-03-21T23:59:59.000Z

351

SRS ecology: Environmental information document  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Document is to provide a source of ecological information based on the exiting knowledge gained from research conducted at the Savannah River Site. This document provides a summary and synthesis of ecological research in the three main ecosystem types found at SRS and information on the threatened and endangered species residing there.

Wike, L.D.; Shipley, R.W.; Bowers, J.A. [and others

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

352

Forecast Technical Document Forecast Types  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Forecast Technical Document Forecast Types A document describing how different forecast types are implemented in the 2011 Production Forecast system. Tom Jenkins Robert Matthews Ewan Mackie Lesley Halsall #12;PF2011 ­ Forecast Types Background Different `types' of forecast are possible for a specified area

353

Forecast Technical Document Volume Increment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Forecast Technical Document Volume Increment Forecasts A document describing how volume increment is handled in the 2011 Production Forecast. Tom Jenkins Robert Matthews Ewan Mackie Lesley Halsall #12;PF2011 ­ Volume increment forecasts Background A volume increment forecast is a fundamental output of the forecast

354

Forecast Technical Document Tree Species  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Forecast Technical Document Tree Species A document listing the tree species included in the 2011 Production Forecast Tom Jenkins Justin Gilbert Ewan Mackie Robert Matthews #12;PF2011 ­ List of tree species The following is the list of species used within the Forecast System. Species are ordered alphabetically

355

Consumer price index revision electricity workbook  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Since electricity is considered one of the more difficult ELIs to price, the Revision Electricity Workbook has been developed to serve as a reference for Economic Assistants when pricing and initiating electricity quotes. As there are relatively few outlets available, (typically one per PSU), and electricity is published for each publication area, any error made when pricing electricity can seriously impact the CPI. To best utilize this workbook, read through it entirely and review the examples found in Section IV. The `Industry Overview` and `Electricity Sampling` sections provide background information that may be useful when interacting with the respondent. The `Specifications Review` section contains detailed descriptions of the checklist specifications as well as examples of how to correctly complete certain specification elements. Examples of how to handle rate schedules, complicated tax structures, refunds, etc., are grouped together in Section IV. The `Initiation` section provides procedural guidelines which must be used during initiation. The final section in the workbook outlines the procedures to be used when pricing CPI/PPI Overlap outlets (companies which participate in both the CPI and PPI surveys). As stated above, this workbook is to be used as a reference guide. If a situation arises that is not covered in this workbook, please contact your regional office for assistance.

NONE

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

356

Solar Background Document 5 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 Solar Background Document 5 Graph illustrating Chinese Development Bank financing to Chinese solar companies. Solar Background Document 5.pdf More Documents & Publications Solar...

357

b. document identification and review policy  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

documents, as necessary, and for historical purposes; To establish a means in ... In the bottom left-hand corner of each document, a history of the document.

358

Documents: Disposal of DUF6 Conversion Products  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DUF6 Conversion Products Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Disposal of DUF6 Conversion Products PDF Icon Engineering Analysis for Disposal of...

359

Program Documents | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Documents Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Human Resources > Employee Concerns Program > Program Documents Program Documents Reference Guide Process...

360

Presentation, Marking OUO Documents - August 2013 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Presentation, Marking OUO Documents - August 2013 Presentation, Marking OUO Documents - August 2013 August 2013 This presentation is solely on how to mark documents containing OUO...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

SRS - SRNS General Provisions and Related Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SRNS General Provisions and Related Documents General ProvisionsTerms and Conditions Documents Certifications SolicitationSubcontract Documents Focused Observation Safety...

362

Solar Background Document 6 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Background Document 6 Graph illustrating solar cell production in the United States and China from 2002 to 2010. Solar Background Document 6.pdf More Documents & Publications Solar...

363

Infrared Thermography Guide (Revision 3)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Costly equipment outages can be reduced by implementing a comprehensive predictive maintenance program. Infrared thermography (IR), a fundamental component of such programs, uses nonintrusive techniques to monitor the operating condition of equipment and components. This revised report provides updated information to assist utilities in implementing an effective IR program.

2002-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

364

Tank safety screening data quality objective. Revision 1  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Tank Safety Screening Data Quality Objective (DQO) will be used to classify 149 single shell tanks and 28 double shell tanks containing high-level radioactive waste into safety categories for safety issues dealing with the presence of ferrocyanide, organics, flammable gases, and criticality. Decision rules used to classify a tank as ``safe`` or ``not safe`` are presented. Primary and secondary decision variables used for safety status classification are discussed. The number and type of samples required are presented. A tabular identification of each analyte to be measured to support the safety classification, the analytical method to be used, the type of sample, the decision threshold for each analyte that would, if violated, place the tank on the safety issue watch list, and the assumed (desired) analytical uncertainty are provided. This is a living document that should be evaluated for updates on a semiannual basis. Evaluation areas consist of: identification of tanks that have been added or deleted from the specific safety issue watch lists, changes in primary and secondary decision variables, changes in decision rules used for the safety status classification, and changes in analytical requirements. This document directly supports all safety issue specific DQOs and additional characterization DQO efforts associated with pretreatment and retrieval. Additionally, information obtained during implementation can assist in resolving assumptions for revised safety strategies, and in addition, obtaining information which will support the determination of error tolerances, confidence levels, and optimization schemes for later revised safety strategy documentation.

Hunt, J.W.

1995-04-27T23:59:59.000Z

365

InitiativesTalkingPoints | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ativesTalkingPoints&0; More Documents & Publications Suggested Talking Points for Hydrogen Road Tour &8220;C-3E&8221; WOMEN&8217;S INITIATIVE: Renewable Energy and a Smart Grid...

366

Search Committee Guide revised 05/29/2013 #420 Page 1 of 17  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Search Committee Guide revised 05/29/2013 #420 Page 1 of 17 Search Committee Guide for Non-Faculty Positions INTRODUCTION This document provides an information resource for search committees for non are available upon request to brief search committees on this guide. Links to online resources are included

367

Orientation Checklist revised 06/11/10 #100 page 1 of 1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Orientation Checklist revised 06/11/10 #100 page 1 of 1 New Employee Orientation Checklist INSTRUCTIONS This form is intended as a guide for HR Liaisons to document a new employee's orientation at Texas on employee orientations is available on the website at http://employees.tamu.edu/managers/liaisonResources/Orientation

368

Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision of Chapter 11, Contracting Officer's Representative SUMMARY: The...

369

2011-2012 Methods Additions and Revisions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Additions and revisions (new, updated, or revised methods) are included in print form. Corrections (minor typographical errors) are included in an accompanying CD-ROM. 2011-2012 Methods Additions and Revisions DVD & CD-ROMs Soft Bound Books Methods - An

370

IEC documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IEC documents IEC documents IEC documents The U.S. Department of Energy has longstanding cooperative arrangements with foreign governments and international organizations in all areas of its mission - energy supply and security, science and technology, non-proliferation, and the environment, including promoting clean energy technologies to address climate change. The Department has over one hundred active commitments with 70-plus countries and 11 international organizations. Through this site, you can search and access the Department's library of active and historic (expired) commitments. Country or International Organization Algeria Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Canada CERN Chile China Colombia Costa Rica CSLF

371

Towards automatic building of document keywords  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Document keywords are associated to documents as summarized versions of the documents' content. Considering that the number of documents is quickly growing every day, the availability of these keywords is very important. Although, usually keywords are ...

Joaquim Silva; Gabriel Lopes

2010-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands Initial Technical Assessment  

SciTech Connect

This document is an initial energy assessment for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), the first of many steps in developing a comprehensive energy strategy.

Baring-Gould, I.; Hunsberger, R.; Visser, C.; Voss, P.

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

DuPont's Safety Model and Sustainability Initiatives | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initiatives More Documents & Publications Sustainability Outreach Program Brochure Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb TheManhattanProject2010.pdf...

374

Title, Location, Document Number Estimated Cost Description  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Moody to Lev, SUBJECT: NEPA 2012 APS for DOE-SRS, Dated: JAN 25 2012 Moody to Lev, SUBJECT: NEPA 2012 APS for DOE-SRS, Dated: JAN 25 2012 Title, Location, Document Number Estimated Cost Description EA Determination Date: uncertain Transmittal to State: uncertain EA Approval: uncertain FONSI: uncertain EA Determination Date: uncertain Transmittal to State: uncertain EA Approval: uncertain FONSI: uncertain Total Estimated Cost $65,000 Annual NEPA Planning Summary NEPA Reviews of Proposals to Implement Enterprise SRS Initiatives unknown The Savannah River Site Strategic Plan for 2011 - 2015 describes 12 initiatives that Enterprise SRS will pursue by applying SRS's management core competencies in nuclear materials. Implementation of new missions resulting from this effort will likely require NEPA review. However, until firm proposals are developed

375

Document Library | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Services » Document Library Services » Document Library Document Library January 1, 2014 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Scorecard - January 2014 The scorecard includes news updates, regulatory status, reactor design certification, early site permits, new plant construction progress, and expected operation dates. December 4, 2013 Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) This report documents the first phase of a multi-year project to understand the technical feasibility and logistical implications of direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel in existing dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) and other types of storage casks. November 26, 2013 MEETING MATERIALS: DECEMBER 19, 2013 Washington Marriott at Metro Center Ballroom A 775 12th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 October 31, 2013

376

Annotation persistence over dynamic documents  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Annotations, as a routine practice of actively engaging with reading materials, are heavily used in the paper world to augment the usefulness of documents. By annotation, we include a large variety of creative manipulations ...

Wang, Shaomin, 1969-

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

A Step Towards Automatic Documentation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This paper describes a system which automatically generates program documentation. Starting with a plan generated by analyzing the program, the system computes several kinds of summary information about the program. The ...

Frank, Claude

378

Reactor operation environmental information document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This volume is a reactor operation environmental information document for the Savannah River Plant. Topics include meteorology, surface hydrology, transport, environmental impacts, and radiation effects. 48 figs., 56 tabs. (KD)

Bauer, L.R.; Hayes, D.W.; Hunter, C.H.; Marter, W.L.; Moyer, R.A.

1989-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

Document Library | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Document Library Services » Document Library Document Library January 1, 2014 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Scorecard - January 2014 The scorecard includes news updates, regulatory status, reactor design certification, early site permits, new plant construction progress, and expected operation dates. December 4, 2013 Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) This report documents the first phase of a multi-year project to understand the technical feasibility and logistical implications of direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel in existing dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) and other types of storage casks. November 26, 2013 MEETING MATERIALS: DECEMBER 19, 2013 Washington Marriott at Metro Center Ballroom A 775 12th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 October 31, 2013

380

SAVANNAH RIVER SITE COLD WAR HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WAR HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION WAR HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION NARRATIVE AND PHOTOGRAPHY CMX AND TNX SAVANNAH RIVER'S PILOT PLANTS Aiken County, South Carolina SAVANNAH RIVER SITE COLD WAR HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION CMX AND TNX CMX AND TNX SA SA V V ANNAH RIVER'S ANNAH RIVER'S PILOT PLANTS PILOT PLANTS Aiken County, South Carolina NARRATIVE AND PHOTOGRAPHY ii ABSTRACT This documentation was prepared in accordance with a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed by the Department of Energy-Savannah River (DOE-SR) and the South Carolina Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) dated February 27, 2003, as well as the Consolidated MOA of August 2004. The MOA stipulated a thematic study and photographic documentation of 679-T and 678-T, known respectively as the CMX and TNX buildings. Initially, this area was called the CMX-TNX

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

RPP-RPT-42583 Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

RPP-RPT-42583 RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations C. S. Henderson T. C. Mackey Washington River Protection Solutions Date Published October 2009 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 ~. washington river ~ protectionso/utions P.O. Box 850 Richland, Washington Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited TRADEMARK

382

Document:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 Experimental Study of Coupling Impedance Part I Longitudinal Impedance Measurement Techniques J. J. Song Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 60439 October 22, 1991 Abstract Beam coupling impedances for the 7-GeV APS storage ring have been numerically esti- mated [1]. In order to confirm these calculations, measurements of the coupling impedance of various vacuum components around the main storage ring were done with a coaxial wire meth- od. In this paper, the procedure of the longitudinal impedance measurement techniques will be described. As an example, sections of the Cu beam chamber, the Cu beam+antechambers, and the Al beam+antechambers were used as a device under test (DUT) to obtain the results. The transverse impedance measurements will be described in a separate paper.

383

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

717 Federal Register 717 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 20, 2010 / Notices this discussion is protected by exemptions 2 and 6 of section 552b(c) of Title 5 U.S.C. Individuals who will need accommodations for a disability in order to attend the meeting (e.g., interpreting services, assistive listening devices, or material in alternative format) should notify Terrie Nelson at (202) 401-0424 no later than October 25, 2010. We will make every attempt to meet requests for accommodations after this date, but, cannot guarantee their availability. The meeting site is accessible to individuals with disabilities. Public Comment: Time is scheduled on the agenda to receive public comment at approximately 3 p.m.-5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time November 4, 2010. OR Those members of the

384

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Federal Register 8 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Notices (b) Increased incorporation of mental health research findings into practice or policy. The RRTC must contribute to this outcome by coordinating with appropriate NIDRR-funded knowledge translation grantees to advance or add to their work in the following areas: (1) Developing and implementing procedures to evaluate the readiness of mental health research findings for translation into practice. (2) Collaborating with stakeholder groups to develop, evaluate, or implement strategies to increase utilization of mental health research findings. (3) Conducting training, technical assistance, and dissemination activities to increase utilization of mental health research findings. Information on knowledge translation

385

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

05 Federal Register 05 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices turtles, provide information on population dynamics to improve stock assessments, and to better understand the distribution of turtles in time and space. Turtles that are incidentally captured during resource assessment cruises would be used by the SEFSC in their assessments of distribution and abundance of turtles, as well as the cumulative impact of the relevant fishery on the stocks. The incidental capture would accrue to and be authorized by the fisheries being researched. The SEFSC would annually handle, identify, examine, measure, weigh, photograph, flipper tag, passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag, skin biopsy, and release or salvage the carcass, tissue, and parts of up to 6

386

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

50 50 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 33 / Friday, February 18, 2005 / Notices Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877- 8339. [FR Doc. E5-663 Filed 2-17-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION Sunshine Act Notice; Meeting AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission. ACTION: Notice of public meeting for the Technical Guidelines Development Committee. DATE & TIME: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 8:30 am to 5:30 pm. PLACE: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Building 101, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8900. STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public. There is no fee to attend, but, due to security requirements, advance registration is required. Registration information is available at: https:// rproxy.nist.gov/CRS/

387

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Federal Register 8 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 27, 2011 / Notices Tentative Agenda: October 19, 2011. 2 p.m.-5 p.m. E.D.T. 1:30 p.m.-2 p.m. Registration. 2 p.m.-2:15 p.m. Welcome and Introductions. 2:15 p.m.-3:15 p.m. Presentation on U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Vision of a Future Grid. 3:15 p.m.-3:30 p.m. Break. 3:30 p.m.-4:15 p.m. Response to DOE's Vision of a Future Grid. 4:15 p.m.-5 p.m. EAC Member Roundtable Discussion on DOE's Vision of a Future Grid. 5 p.m. Adjourn Day One of EAC Meeting . 5:30 p.m.-7:30 p.m. EAC Member Dutch Treat Meeting-Venue TBD. October 20, 2011. 8 a.m.-4 p.m. E.D.T. 7:30 a.m.-8 a.m. Registration. Continental Breakfast and Networking (EAC members only). 8 a.m.-8:15 a.m. Day Two Opening Remarks. 8:15 a.m.-9:30 a.m. Panel Discussion

388

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

267 Federal Register 267 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 30, 2009 / Notices Dated: June 24, 2009. William Modzeleski, Acting Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools. [FR Doc. E9-15489 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy. ACTION: Notice of open meeting. SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92- 463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register. DATES: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. (EST). ADDRESSES: TMS, Inc., 955 L'Enfant Plaza North, SW., Suite 1500, Washington, DC 20024.

389

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20 Federal Register 20 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 10, 2010 / Notices ADDRESSES: Sugar Land Marriott Town Square, 16090 City Walk, Sugar Land, Texas 77479-6539. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elena Melchert, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Oil and Natural Gas, Washington, DC 20585. Phone: 202- 586-5600. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Committee: The purpose of the Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee is to provide advice on development and implementation of programs related to ultra-deepwater architecture and technology to the Secretary of Energy and provide comments and recommendations and priorities for the Department of Energy Annual Plan per requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999D. Tentative Agenda

390

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61 Federal Register 61 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 900 RIN 1901-AB18 Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and opportunity for comment. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to amend an interim final rule published elsewhere in today's Federal Register that establishes procedures for DOE coordination of all applicable Federal authorizations for the siting of interstate electric transmission facilities and related environmental reviews pursuant to section 216(h) of the Federal Power Act (FPA). This proposed rule would clarify a provision

391

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

05 Federal Register 05 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 16, 2008 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Department of Education. ACTION: Correction Notice. SUMMARY: On January 9, 2008, the Department of Education published a comment period notice in the Federal Register (Page 1609, Column 3) for the information collection, ''Common Core of Data Survey System.'' The abstract is hereby corrected to read, ''The Common Core of Data fiscal data collection gathers universe information from states about public school districts and schools. Information is collected annually from school districts about the districts and their members schools.'' The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services,

392

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

869 Federal Register 869 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 3, 2007 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The Historically Black Colleges and Universities Capital Financing Advisory Board AGENCY: The Historically Black Colleges and Universities Capital Financing Board, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice of an open meeting. SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of an upcoming open meeting of the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Capital Financing Advisory Board. The notice also describes the functions of the Board. Notice of this meeting is required by Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and is intended to notify the public of their opportunity to attend. DATES: Friday, April 20, 2007. Time: 10 a.m.-2 p.m.

393

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

466 Federal Register 466 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Notices approximately 130 monitors, which will result in the addition of 66 respondents. What Is the Next Step in the Process for This ICR? EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Dated: October 5, 2009. Ronald Fraass,

394

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

91 Federal Register 91 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Notices correction mechanism ensures the accuracy of the Inventory without imposing an unreasonable burden on the chemical industry. Without the Inventory correction mechanism, a company that submitted incorrect information would have to file a pre- manufacture notification (PMN) under TSCA section 5 to place the correct chemical substance on the Inventory whenever the previously reported substance is found to be misidentified. This would impose a much greater burden on both EPA and the submitter than the existing correction mechanism. This information collection applies to reporting and recordkeeping activities associated with the correction of misreported chemical substances found

395

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

84 Federal Register 84 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 198 / Friday, October 13, 2006 / Notices burden of the information collections, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the information collections on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Comments regarding this collection must be received on or before November 13, 2006. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, please advise the OMB Desk Officer of your intention to make a submission as

396

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 1, 2003 Part II Department of Defense General Services Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration 48 CFR Parts 1, 2, et al. Federal Acquisition Regulations; Final and Interim Rules VerDate jul2003 16:45 Sep 30, 2003 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\01OCR2.SGM 01OCR2 56668 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 190 / Wednesday, October 1, 2003 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 48 CFR Chapter 1 Federal Acquisition Circular 2001-16; Introduction AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Summary presentation of final and interim rules, and technical

397

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

63 Federal Register 63 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 217 / Friday, November 9, 2007 / Notices to obtain all necessary permits for road construction. In 2040, the lease agreement expires and the developer is obligated to demolish the 300 housing units. During development of the EIS, the Navy will evaluate the no-action alternative and several alternative road alignments which will provide unimpeded access from the Laurelwood housing area to a State primary or secondary road without adversely impacting NWS Earle security or operational/mission capability. In addition to the natural and cultural environment located along the various road alignments, the Navy will evaluate the potential impacts to local school systems, base security, community services, and traffic impacts at proposed

398

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 15, 2009 Part III Department of Defense General Services Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration 48 CFR Parts 2, 3, 12 et al. Federal Acquisition Regulation; Final Rules and Small Entity Compliance Guide VerDate Nov2008 21:31 Jan 14, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\15JAR3.SGM 15JAR3 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES 2710 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 48 CFR Chapter 1 [Docket FAR 2009-0012, Sequence 1] Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-30; Introduction AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA),

399

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

43 Federal Register 43 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 22, 2010 / Notices you may do so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Melea Baker via FAX at 301-903-4846 or via e-mail (Melea.Baker@science.doe.gov). You must make your request for an oral statement at least 5 business days prior to the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made to include the scheduled oral statements on the agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will conduct the meeting to facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Public comment will follow the 10-minute rule. This notice is being published less than 15 days before the date of the meeting due to programmatic issues.

400

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

073 073 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices 1 Record of Decision for the Department's Waste Management Program: Treatment and Disposal of Low-Level Waste and Mixed Low-Level Waste; Amendment of the Record of Decision for the Nevada Test Site (65 FR 10061, February 25, 2000). 2 Record of Decision for the Solid Waste Program, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington: Storage and Treatment of Low-Level Waste and Mixed Low- Level Waste; Disposal of Low-Level Waste and Mixed Low-Level Waste, and Storage, Processing and Certification of Transuranic Waste for Shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (69 FR 39449, June 30, 2004. core academic outcomes of reading and writing, mathematics, and science will be emphasized, as will discipline and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 9, 2009 January 9, 2009 Part II Department of Energy Privacy Act of 1974; Publication of Compilation of Privacy Act Systems of Records; Notice VerDate Nov2008 15:08 Jan 08, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09JAN2.SGM 09JAN2 yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES2 994 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2009 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Privacy Act of 1974; Publication of Compilation of Privacy Act Systems of Records AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: As required by the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130, the Department of Energy including the National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) (hereinafter referred to collectively as

402

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

87 Federal Register 87 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 227 / Monday, November 24, 2008 / Notices a franchised service area. The electric energy which CSE proposes to export to Mexico would be surplus energy purchased from electric utilities, Federal power marketing agencies, and other entities within the United States. CSE proposes to export electric energy to Mexico and to arrange for the delivery of those exports over the international transmission facilities presently owned by AEP Texas Central, El Paso Electric Company, Central Power & Light Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Sharyland Utilities, and Comision Federal de Electricidad, the national electric utility of Mexico. The construction, operation, maintenance, and connection of each of the international transmission facilities

403

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

846 Federal Register 846 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Notices 1 The regional reliability organizations under FPA section 215 are the Florida Reliability Coordinating Council, the Midwest Reliability Organization, the Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Reliability First Corporation, SERC Reliability Corporation, the Southwest Power Pool, the Texas Regional Entity (TRE), and the Western Electricity Coordinating Council. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Electric Transmission Congestion Study AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Request for written comments and notice of technical workshops. SUMMARY: Section 216(a)(1) of the Federal Power Act (FPA) requires the Department of Energy (Department or

404

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Federal Register 3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Notices 1 e.g. municipalities, public power entities and electric cooperatives. 2 A smart meter is a good example of an enabling Smart Grid technology that can empower both utilities and consumers to extract value from two- way communications and real-time access to usage data. Smart meters play an important role in the success of the Smart Grid because they can generate an array of useful data including historical energy consumption data, real-time data, and price-and- demand-response data. 3 Dep't of Energy, What the Smart Grid Means to Americans, 2, 23 (Aug. 31, 2009), available at http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/ ConsumerAdvocates.pdf. 4 Fed. Commc'n Comm'n, Connecting America:

405

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Register Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Notices www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA

406

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

37002 Federal Register 37002 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 129 / Friday, July 6, 2007 / Notices the Designated Federal Officer, Subcommittee presentations and reports. 1 p.m.-4:30 p.m.-Facilitated Discussions by the members regarding subcommittee reports; approval of final Committee recommendations. 4:30 p.m.-5 p.m.-Public Comments. 5 p.m.-Adjourn. Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The Designated Federal Officer, the Chairman of the Committee and a Facilitator will lead the meeting for the orderly conduct of business. If you would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Elena Melchert or Bill Hochheiser at the

407

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

782 Federal Register 782 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2008 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [OE Docket No. PP-334] Application for Presidential Permit; Baja Wind U.S. Transmission, LLC AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE. ACTION: Notice of Application. SUMMARY: Sempra Generation, on behalf of Baja Wind U.S. Transmission, LLC (Baja Wind), has applied for a Presidential permit to construct, operate, maintain, and connect an electric transmission line across the U.S. border with Mexico. DATES: Comments, protests, or requests to intervene must be submitted on or before March 24, 2008. ADDRESSES: Comments, protests, or requests to intervene should be addressed as follows: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20), U.S. Department of

408

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16 16 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2004 / Notices Title II Requirements Payments; Court Case Update; Results from the HAVA College Poll Worker Program; Election Day Data Collection Update. The Commission will also receive presentations on EAC Election Day Activities and other items. Presentations will include: Election Day at the EAC Office; Election Day Reports from the Field; Election Day Summary; EAC Plan of Action for 2005. PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566- 3100. DeForest B. Soaries, Jr. Chairman, U.S. Election Assistance Commission. [FR Doc. 04-25339 Filed 11-9-04; 3:50 pm] BILLING CODE 6820-YN-M DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [Docket No. EA-298] Application To Export Electric Energy; ISO New England Inc.

409

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

44 Federal Register 44 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 18, 2011 / Notices December 1, 2011, 1 p.m.-4 p.m., Local Time. The above-referenced meetings will be held at: DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel, 5400 Computer Drive, Westborough, Massachusetts 01581. The above-referenced meetings are open to stakeholders. Further information may be found at http://www.iso-ne.com. The discussions at the meetings described above may address matters at issue in the following proceedings: Docket No. ER11-4021, ISO New England Inc., Northeast Utilities Service Company. Docket No. ER11-4022, ISO New England Inc., Northeast Utilities Service Company. Docket No. ER11-4023, ISO New England Inc., Northeast Utilities Service Company. Docket No. ER11-49, National Grid Transmission Services Corporation.

410

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8864 Federal Register 8864 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Notices This notice announces a meeting of the Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee. Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that notice of these meetings be announced in the Federal Register. DATES: Wednesday, March 13, 2008, 1 to 3 p.m. ADDRESSES: TMS, Inc., 955 L'Enfant Plaza North, SW., Suite 1500, Washington, DC 20024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elena Melchert or Bill Hochheiser, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Oil and Natural Gas, Washington, DC 20585. Phone: 202-586-5600. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Committee: The purpose of the Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee is to provide advice on

411

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Federal Register 2 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 98 / Friday, May 22, 2009 / Notices proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Issued in Washington, DC, on May 15, 2009. Owen F. Barwell, Deputy Chief Financial Officer. [FR Doc. E9-11995 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P

412

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 Federal Register 04 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 165 / Monday, August 25, 2008 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Environmental Management Site- Specific Advisory Board Chairs AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting. SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB) Chairs. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register. DATES: Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.; Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. ADDRESSES: Key Bridge Marriott, 1401 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia, Phone: (703) 524-6400, Fax: (703) 524- 8964. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: E. Douglas Frost, Designated Federal

413

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

781 Federal Register 781 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 231 / Monday, December 1, 2008 / Notices Management Plan (35 points) * The extent to which the offeror provides a description of its plan for managing the project in a clear and sequential fashion, and the extent to which that plan provides credible evidence that the management of personnel, physical resources, activities, and work production will result in a robust portal with a 99.99 percent ''uptime rate.'' (20 points) * The quality of the offeror's plans to establish and work with an advisory committee that has appropriate expertise to advise the offeror on its implementation of the project. (5 points) * The extent to which the time commitments of the offeror's staff are appropriate to operating and maintaining U.S.A. Learns Web Portal.

414

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20 Federal Register 20 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 24 / Friday, February 5, 2010 / Notices The discussions at each of the meetings described above may address matters at issue in pending proceedings including the following: Docket Nos. EL07-39 and ER08-695, New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Docket No. EL09-57, Astoria Gas Turbine Power LLC v. New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Docket No. EL10-033, New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Docket No. ER01-3155, New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Docket Nos. ER01-3001-021/ER03- 647-012 and ER01-3001-022/ER03- 647-013, New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Docket No. ER04-449, New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Docket No. ER04-230, New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Docket No. ER07-612, New York

415

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

75 Federal Register 75 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Indian Affairs Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 1813, Draft Report to Congress AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Publication of Draft Report to Congress. SUMMARY: Section 1813 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-58) requires the Department of the Interior and the Department of Energy (Departments) to jointly conduct a study of issues related to energy rights-of-way (ROWs) on tribal lands. The Act further directs the Departments to submit a report to Congress on the findings of the study. The Draft Report to Congress is available for review on the Section 1813 Web site (http://1813.anl.gov). The Departments will hold several

416

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

981 Federal Register 981 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules Paperwork Reduction Act This proposed rule contains no new information collection or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). List of Subjects 7 CFR Part 318 Cotton, Cottonseeds, Fruits, Guam, Hawaii, Plant diseases and pests, Puerto Rico, Quarantine, Transportation, Vegetables, Virgin Islands. 7 CFR Part 319 Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rice, Vegetables. Accordingly, we are proposing to amend 7 CFR parts 318 and 319 as follows: PART 318-STATE OF HAWAII AND TERRITORIES QUARANTINE NOTICES 1. The authority citation for part 318

417

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

886 886 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 7, 2004 / Notices of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at: www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ index.html. Dated: June 30, 2004. Troy R. Justesen, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. [FR Doc. 04-15408 Filed 7-6-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-U DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Privacy Act of 1974; Notice of Amendment to an Existing System of Records AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: As required by the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130, the Department of Energy (DOE) is publishing a notice of a proposed amendment to an existing system of records. DOE proposes to amend DOE-50 ''Personnel Assurance

418

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

60 Federal Register 60 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 207 / Friday, October 24, 2008 / Notices 1 The nuclear weapons stockpile consists of nuclear weapons that are both deployed to the military services (''operationally deployed'') and ''reserve weapons'' that could be used to augment the operationally deployed weapons or to provide replacements for warheads that experience safety or reliability problems. Informed Commitment-Confirm willingness and availability of appropriate agency leadership and staff at all levels to commit to principles of engagement, and ensure commitment to participate in good faith with open mindset to new perspectives. Balanced, Voluntary Representation- Ensure balanced inclusion of affected/ concerned interests; all parties should be willing and able to participate and select

419

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

716 Federal Register 716 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Notices Information Management and Privacy Services, Office of Management, invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13). DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before May 18, 2011. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Education Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, be faxed to (202) 395-5806 or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov with a cc: to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be

420

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

83 Federal Register 83 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Notices end of the public hearing, and received by 4:30 p.m. EDT on Aug 18, 2010. Written testimony should be submitted via e-mail at testimony@eac.gov, via mail addressed to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission 1201 New York Avenue NW., Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005, or by fax at 202-566-1392. All correspondence that contains written testimony must have in the subject/attention line (or on the envelope if by mail): Written testimony on proposed NVRA regulations. Members of the public may observe but not participate in EAC meetings unless this notice provides otherwise. Members of the public may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the proceedings. The use of other

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32 Federal Register 32 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Notices DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before June 25, 2007. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. OMB may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the extent that public participation in the approval process would defeat the purpose of the information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any agency's ability to perform its statutory obligations. The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information

422

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 Federal Register 9 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 32 / Thursday, February 19, 2009 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Technical Workshop in Support of DOE 2009 Congestion Study AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE. ACTION: Notice of Technical Workshop. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) will conduct a Technical Workshop to receive input from subject matter experts on the historical transmission data in the Western and Eastern Interconnections and on studies of future transmission projections within the two Interconnections. The input received will be used by DOE in preparing the 2009 Congestion Study which will be submitted to Congress by August 8, 2009. Specific issues to be addressed at

423

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 21, 2003 August 21, 2003 Part III Department of Energy 10 CFR Part 600 Financial Assistance Regulations; Final Rule VerDate jul2003 17:53 Aug 20, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\21AUR2.SGM 21AUR2 50646 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 162 / Thursday, August 21, 2003 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 600 RIN 1991-AB57 Financial Assistance Regulations AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is amending its Assistance Regulations by adding a new subpart, making minor amendments to existing subparts to reflect this change, and eliminating a section that contains internal procedures for DOE officials or requirements that are contained in other sections. The new subpart establishes

424

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

92 Federal Register 92 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices llllllllllllllllll l c. Provide a brief explanation of the applicant's ability to receive and use, or receive and distribute, Federal power as of [date]: llllllllllllllllll l 6. Other Information. The applicant may provide any other information pertinent to receiving an allocation: llllllllllllllllll l 7. Signature: Western requires the signature and title of an appropriate official who is able to attest to the validity of the APD and who is authorized to submit the request for an allocation. By signing below, I certify the APD which I have provided is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature Title Record Keeping Requirements: If Western accepts an application and the

425

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

684 Federal Register 684 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 169 / Wednesday, September 1, 2010 / Notices income students for school year 2010- 2011. Also, in determining whether to approve an application for a new award (including the amount of the award) from an applicant with a current grant under this program, the Department will consider the amount of any carryover funds under the existing grant. VI. Award Administration Information 1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notification (GAN). We may notify you informally, also. If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, we notify you. 2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify administrative and national policy

426

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

83 Federal Register 83 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2011 / Notices 1 Notice of Technical Conference re Priorities for Addressing Risks to the Reliability of the Bulk- Power System, 76 FR 2369 (January 13, 2011), as supplemented by the Reliability Technical Conference Agenda issued January 7, 2011. Secretary Richard K. Sullivan, Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, Attn: MEPA Office [Aisling O' Shea], EEA No. 14696, 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900, Boston, MA 02114. To send comments by e-mail or fax, or for questions regarding the MEPA process, contact Aisling O'Shea, MEPA Analyst at: e-mail: aisling.o'shea@state.ma.us; Fax: (617) 626-1181 or Phone: (617) 626-1024. In addition, please file a copy of your comments with the Federal Energy

427

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Federal Register 7 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 122 / Friday, June 26, 2009 / Notices June 10, 2009. Patricia L. Toppings, OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. E9-15116 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06-C DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [OE Docket No. EA-249-B] Application To Export Electric Energy; Exelon Generation Company, LLC AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE. ACTION: Notice of Application. SUMMARY: Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) has applied to renew its authority to transmit electric energy from the United States to Canada pursuant to section 202(e) of the Federal Power Act. DATES: Comments, protests, or requests to intervene must be submitted on or before July 27, 2009. ADDRESSES: Comments, protests or

428

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

611 Federal Register 611 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 113 / Monday, June 14, 2010 / Notices August 19, 2005, in Order No. EA-182- B. That Order will expire on August 21, 2010. On May 13, 2010, HQUS filed an application with DOE for renewal of the export authority contained in Order No. EA-182-B for an additional five-year term. The electric energy that HQUS proposes to export to Canada would be surplus energy purchased from electric utilities, Federal power marketing agencies and other entities within the United States. The existing international transmission facilities to be utilized by HQUS have previously been authorized by Presidential permits issued pursuant to Executive Order 10485, as amended, and are appropriate for open access transmission by third parties.

429

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

811 Federal Register 811 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 43 / Friday, March 6, 2009 / Notices the Defense Department Advisory Committee on Women in the Services. Individuals submitting a written statement must submit their statement to the Point of Contact listed above at the address detailed above NLT 5 p.m., Thursday, March 19, 2009. If a written statement is not received by Thursday, March 19, 2009, prior to the meeting, which is the subject of this notice, then it may not be provided to or considered by the Defense Department Advisory Committee on Women in the Services until its next open meeting. The Designated Federal Officer will review all timely submissions with the Defense Department Advisory Committee on Women in the Services Chairperson and ensure they are provided to the

430

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

477 Federal Register 477 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 230 / Friday, November 28, 2008 / Notices EIS No. 20080338, ERP No. F-FHW- J40180-UT, UT-108 Transportation Improvement Project, To Improve Local and Regional Mobility from UT-108 between UT-127 (Antelope Drive) to UT-126 (1900 West) Located in Syracuse, West Point and Clinton in Dave County, and Roy and West Haven in Weber County, UT. Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns about mobile source air toxics. However, EPA is pleased that FHWA has addressed previous concerns raised about other construction emission BMPs and mitigation measures for impacts to sensitive receptors. EIS No. 20080367, ERP No. F-FHW- J40178-UT, Mountain View Corridor (MVC) Project, Proposed Transportation Improvement 2030 Travel Demand in Western Salt Lake

431

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

73 73 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2002 / Rules and Regulations referred to in paragraph (g)(1) of this clause is not allowable. (4) The term ''contractor's managerial personnel'' is defined in the Property clause in this contract. (k) The contractor may at its own expense and not as an allowable cost procure for its own protection insurance to compensate the contractor for any unallowable or unreimbursable costs incurred in connection with contract performance. (l) If any suit or action is filed or any claim is made against the contractor, the cost and expense of which may be reimbursable to the contractor under this contract, and the risk of which is then uninsured or is insured for less than the amount claimed, the contractor shall- (1) Immediately notify the contracting

432

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3970 Federal Register 3970 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 2006 / Notices These advances in technology are the driving factor for this expansion. Alternative I was chosen because it best meets the Army's need for additional training land. There are impacts to many natural resources expected as part of the proposed action. Mitigation has been proposed to offset the impacts identified in the SFEIS. Even taking into account this mitigation, however, there will still be significant impacts to threatened and endangered species, loss of vegetation cover, loss and disruption of soil surfaces, and loss of wilderness characteristics to adjacent wideness areas. The decision also restates the army's continuing commitment to environmental stewardship by implementing mitigation and

433

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 Federal Register 5 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices Submission Requirements: (a) A test publisher must comply with the requirements in § 462.11 of the NRS regulations when submitting an application. (b) In accordance with § 462.10 of the NRS regulations, the deadline for transmittal of applications is October 1, 2010. (c) Whether you submit your application by mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier) or you hand deliver (or use a courier service) your application, you must mail or deliver three copies of your application, on or before the deadline date, to the following address: NRS Assessment Review, c/o American Institutes for Research, 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007. (d) If you submit your application by

434

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

70 Federal Register 70 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 207 / Friday, October 24, 2008 / Notices and Operational Needs, Funding and U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit, City of Missoula, Missoula County, MT. Summary: EPA expressed concern about air and water construction impacts and recommended additional analysis and information to fully assess and mitigate impacts of the proposed action. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20080365, ERP No. D-NPS- C61012-NY, Fort Stanwix National Monument General Management Plan, Implementation, Funding, City of Rome, Oneida County, NY. Summary: EPA has no objections to the preferred alternative. Rating LO. Final EISs EIS No. 20080339, ERP No. F-BLM- J65497-UT, Monticello Field Office Resource Management Plan, To Guide the Management of Public Land, Southern two-third of San Juan

435

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21 21 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 51 / Thursday, March 17, 2005 / Notices SW., Washington, DC 20585-0350 (FAX 202-287-5736). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Xavier Puslowski (Program Office) 202- 586-4708 or Michael Skinker (Program Attorney) 202-586-2793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exports of electricity from the United States to a foreign country are regulated and require authorization under section 202(e) of the Federal Power Act (FPA) (16 U.S.C. 824a(e)). On November 13, 2001, the Office of Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of Energy (DOE) issued Order No. EA-247 which authorized Constellation (formerly AES NewEnergy, Inc.) to transmit electric energy from the United States to Mexico as a power marketer. On April 10, 2003, FE issued Order No. EA-247-A in which it renewed that

436

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 December 2000 4 December 2000 FACT SHEET EPA TO REGULATE MERCURY AND OTHER AIR TOXICS EMISSIONS FROM COAL- AND OIL-FIRED POWER PLANTS TODAY'S ACTION ! To reduce the risk mercury poses to people's health, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing that it will regulate emissions of mercury and other air toxics from coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units (power plants). ! EPA is focusing today's decision on mercury, because mercury has been identified as the toxic of greatest concern among all the air toxics emitted from power plants. Coal-fired power plants are the nation's largest source of mercury air emissions. ! Also today, EPA is finding that such regulation will not be necessary for units fueled by natural gas - with the exception of combustion turbines.

437

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2004 Marketing Plan, is an entity that has executed a BR contract and is allocated a percentage of the BR. The FP percentages are reviewed during March of each year; and if the...

438

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

has signed a Base Resource contract is a Base Resource Customer and is allocated a percentage of the Base Resource. Base Resource is primarily CVP and Washoe Project power output...

439

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Transmission Project, the Pacific Alternating Current Intertie, and Information on the Path 15 Transmission Upgrade-Rate Order No. WAPA-156; Notice VerDate...

440

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Act Western has determined that this rule is exempt from congressional notification requirements under 5 U.S.C. 801 because the action is a rulemaking of particular...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 Federal Register 9 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 122 / Friday, June 26, 2009 / Notices 1 DOE's NEPA regulations state at 10 CFR 1021.343(c) that the Secretary of Energy must provide written approval of any variance under that section. However, this authority has been delegated to the General Counsel pursuant to Department of Energy Delegation Order No. 00-015.00A to the General Counsel. 1 As noted in Western's Notice of Intent to prepare a Big Stone II EIS, Western became the lead agency for preparation of the EIS because the construction of Big Stone II would incorporate a major new generation resource into Western's Continued DOE's existing NEPA regulations provide for certain variances ''soundly based on the interests of national security or the public health, safety, or

442

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

56811 Federal Register 56811 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 190 / Tuesday, September 30, 2008 / Notices with the Committee, you may do so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Elena Melchert at the address or telephone number listed above. You must make your request for an oral statement at least five business days prior to the meeting, and reasonable provisions will be made to include the presentation on the agenda. Public comment will follow the 5 minute rule. Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public review and copying within 60 days at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, Room 1G-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,

443

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

78 Federal Register 78 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2010 / Notices 1 Western has authority to prepare and approve EISs for integrating transmission facilities with its system pursuant to an October 4, 1999 Delegation Order from the DOE Assistant Secretary for Environment, Health and Safety. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Western Area Power Administration Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Staff Assessment for the Solar Reserve LLC Rice Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, CA (DOE/ EIS-0439) and Possible California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE. ACTION: Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Staff Assessment. SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act

444

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

84 Federal Register 84 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Dated: June 25, 2010. Edward Loeb, Director, Acquisition Policy Division. Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without Change Accordingly, the interim rule amending 48 CFR parts 2, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, 26, and 52, which was published in the Federal Register at 74 FR 52847 on October 14, 2009, is adopted as a final rule without change. [FR Doc. 2010-15914 Filed 7-1-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 48 CFR Parts 4 and 52 [FAC 2005-43; FAR Case 2010-008; Item III; Docket 2010-0008, Sequence 1] RIN 9000-AL63 Federal Acquisition Regulation; FAR Case 2010-008, Recovery Act Subcontract Reporting Procedures

445

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

17 Federal Register 17 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 25, 2009 / Notices consistent with legislated activities and to determine the dollar share of the Congressional appropriation to be awarded to successful applicants. This information collection is being submitted under the Streamlined Clearance Process for Discretionary Grant Information Collections (1894- 0001). Therefore, the 30-day public comment period notice will be the only public comment notice published for this information collection. Requests for copies of the information collection submission for OMB review may be accessed from http:// edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ''Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number 3958. When you access the information collection,

446

Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

December 7, 2000 December 7, 2000 Part II Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 9, 141, and 142 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Radionuclides; Final Rule VerDate 112000 13:43 Dec 06, 2000 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\07DER2.SGM pfrm11 PsN: 07DER2 76708 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 236 / Thursday, December 7, 2000 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 9, 141, and 142 [FRL-6909-3] RIN 2040-AC98 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Radionuclides; Final Rule AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: Today, EPA is finalizing maximum contaminant level goals (MCLGs), maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), and monitoring, reporting, and public notification requirements for radionuclides. Today's rule is only

447

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

57 Federal Register 57 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 198 / Friday, October 10, 2008 / Notices Facilities Associated With the Caliente Rail Alignment DOE also has decided to construct and operate the Nevada Railroad Control Center and the National Transportation Operations Center, co- located with the Upland Staging Yard, along the Caliente alternative segment, rather than one mile from the southern boundary of the geologic repository operations area at the Rail Equipment Maintenance Yard. In making this selection, DOE recognizes that locating these facilities at the Upland Staging Yard would require the use of private land, but believes that locating these facilities nearer Caliente, Nevada, is responsive to public comments received on the draft Rail Alignment EIS.

448

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 33 / Wednesday, February 19, 2003 / Notices ACTION: Notice of availability of a Financial Assistance Solicitation. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the intent to issue Financial Assistance Solicitation No. DE-PS26-03NT41757- 0 entitled, ''Ground Breaking Innovative Technology Concepts For Mining.'' The Department of Energy (DOE), National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) is seeking white paper applications on behalf of the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Mining Industries of the Future Program, for advanced concepts that span the mining industry and are capable of revolutionizing the industry as a whole or for discrete segments as regards energy intensity (i.e. energy used to achieve a unit output). DATES: The solicitation will be available

449

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2877 Federal Register 2877 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 25, 2009 / Notices Dated: August 19, 2009. John M. Andersen, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. E9-20500 Filed 8-24-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [FAR Case 2009-009; Docket 2009-0011, Sequence 1] Federal Acquisition Regulation; FAR Case 2009-009, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act)-Reporting Requirements AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense

450

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 Federal Register 5 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Notice of Availability of Draft Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement AGENCY: Office of Nuclear Energy, U.S. Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Availability and Public Hearings. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability of the Draft Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Draft GNEP PEIS, DOE/EIS- 0396). The Draft GNEP PEIS provides an analysis of the potential environmental consequences of the reasonable alternatives to support expansion of domestic and international nuclear energy production while reducing the risks associated with nuclear proliferation and reducing the impacts

451

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

79 Federal Register 79 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Notices ACTION: Notice of public meeting agenda. DATE AND TIME: Thursday, February 2, 2006, 10 a.m.-1 p.m. PLACE: Hyatt Regency (Valley Forge Room), 400 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20001. (Metro Stop: Union Station). AGENDA: The Commission will receive the following reports: Title II Requirements Payments Update; and updates on other administrative matters. The Commission will receive presentations on the following topics: Implementation of the EAC Voting System Certification Program. This meeting will be open to the public. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Whitener. Telephone: (202) 566- 3100. Ray Martinez III, Vice-Chairman, U.S. Election Assistance Commission. [FR Doc. 06-607 Filed 1-18-06; 3:32 pm]

452

Document:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

No 193 No 193 BPM Button Characterization for Offset Calibration Y. Chung March, 1992 Abstract In this note, a basic theory of wave propagation in dielectric media is discussed in con- junction with S parameters to derive the button gain coefficient g e and an analytic expression for the signal from time domain reflectometry (TDR) measurement on a cable and a button. The results can be used to measure the button capacitance and the characteristic impedances of the cable and the button feedthrough. Since g e is a function of S parameters and the button capaci- tance C p , a suggestion is made to make the gain coefficients the same for all four buttons in a BPM by carefully matching the buttons and the cables. 1. Introduction In order to achieve the stringent performance specifications for the beam position moni-

453

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

75 Federal Register 75 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 146 / Friday, July 31, 2009 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Navy Meeting of the Ocean Research and Resources Advisory Panel AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD. ACTION: Notice of open meeting. SUMMARY: The Ocean Research and Resources Advisory Panel (ORRAP) will hold its third regularly scheduled meeting of the year. The meeting will be open to the public. DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and Wednesday, August 12, 2009 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Members of the public should submit their comments one week in advance of the meeting to the meeting Point of Contact. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the offices of the Consortium of Ocean Leadership, 1201 New York Avenue,

454

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 Federal Register 04 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 19 / Monday, January 30, 2006 / Notices 1 The term ''cogeneration facility'' typically describes a facility that produces electric and/or thermal energy independent of or interconnected to the local electricity supplier (grid). 16 U.S.C. 796(18)(A). Similarly, ''small power production The National Energy Technology Laboratory's (NETL) Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil program mission is to enhance U.S. security by ensuring the Nation has a reliable energy supply. The Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil seeks to accomplish this critical goal by advancing environmentally responsible technological solutions that bolster domestic oil and natural gas recovery. Priority will be given to projects in the noted areas of interest-the Williston

455

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

60 Federal Register 60 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 235 / Friday, December 5, 2008 / Notices use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1- 800-877-8339. [FR Doc. E8-28765 Filed 12-4-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Department of Education. SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before January 5, 2009. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,

456

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

986 Federal Register 986 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Notices Washington, DC 20202-4537. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be considered public records. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that Federal agencies provide interested parties an early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. The Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the information collection. The Department of Education is especially interested in

457

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

62 Federal Register 62 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 237 / Friday, December 10, 2010 / Notices Deletions Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification I certify that the following action will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors considered for this certification were: 1. If approved, the action will not result in additional reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities. 2. If approved, the action may result in authorizing small entities to provide the services to the Government. 3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner- O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-48c) in connection with the services proposed for deletion from the Procurement List.

458

Document:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL HYDROCARBON TRANSPORT AT THE UC-4 EMPLACEMENT HOLE, CENTRAL NEVADA TEST AREA prepared by Brad F. Lyles, Greg Pohll, Derek Sloop, Charalambos Papelis submitted to Nevada Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy September 1998 DOE/NV/11508-43 Publication No. 45167 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party's use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference

459

Document:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 Operational Aspects of Experimental Accelerator Physics Glenn A. Decker Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Orbit Measurement and Correction 2.1 Beam Position Monitoring Systems 2.1.1 BPM Sensors 2.1.2 BPM Signal Processing 2.2 Orbit Correction 2.2.1 Reference Orbit Determination 2.2.2 Global Orbit Correction 2.2.3 Local Orbit Correction 3 Betatron Tune Measurement 3.1 Preliminary 3.2 Betatron Tune Measurement Instrumentation 4 Synchrotron Tune Measurement 5 Beam Intensity Measurement 5.1 Intensity Monitor Application 6 Special Topics 6.1 Coupling 6. 2 Dispersion and Chromaticity 6.3 Beta Function Measurement 6.3.1 Quadrupole Massage Technique 6.3.2 Closed-Orbit Difference Technique 7 Acknowledgments 8 References 1 Introduction During the normal course of high energy storage ring operations, it is customary for

460

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

91 Federal Register 91 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 39 / Monday, March 2, 2009 / Notices Counsel, LP-7, Bonneville Power Administration, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, OR 97208-3621; via e-mail at pjburger@bpa.gov; or by telephone at 503-230-4148. Mr. Bennett may be contacted as follows: by U.S. Mail at Mr. Barry Bennett, Office of General Counsel, LC-7, Bonneville Power Administration, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, OR 97208-3621; via e-mail at bbennett@bpa.gov; or by telephone at 503-230-4053. Issued this 20 day of February, 2009. Stephen J. Wright, Administrator and Chief Executive Officer. [FR Doc. E9-4323 Filed 2-27-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Bonneville Power Administration Lyle Falls Fish Passage Project AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Federal Register 1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 19 / Friday, January 29, 2010 / Notices can bring the new highly energy efficient technology represented by the VRV-WIII product class to the market as soon as possible, thereby allowing the U.S. consumer to benefit from our high technology and high efficiency product, and from competition for other manufacturers who may have already received waivers. Confidential Information DACA makes no request to DOE for confidential treatment of any information contained in this Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver. Conclusion Daikin AC (Americas), Inc. Corporation respectfully requests DOE to grant its Petition for Waiver of the applicable test procedure to DACA for the VRV-WIII product design, and to grant its Application for Interim Waiver.

462

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

885 885 Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 4 Thursday, January 7, 2010 Title 3- The President Proclamation 8469 of December 31, 2009 40th Anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act, 2010 By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation Forty years ago, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was signed into law with overwhelming bipartisan support, ushering in a new era of environmental awareness and citizen participation in government. NEPA elevated the role of environmental considerations in proposed Federal agency actions, and it remains the cornerstone of our Nation's modern environmental protections. On this anniversary, we celebrate this milestone in our Nation's rich history of conservation, and we renew our commitment to preserve

463

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81 Federal Register 81 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 237 / Friday, December 10, 2010 / Notices December 7, 1971 (36 FR 23939), and promulgated on April 6, 1973 (38 FR 8826). This standard applies to all extraction plants, ceramic plants, foundries, incinerators, and propellant plants which process beryllium ore, beryllium, beryllium oxide, beryllium alloys, or beryllium-containing waste. The standard also applies to machine shops which process beryllium, beryllium oxides, or any alloy when such alloy contains more than five percent beryllium by weight. All sources known to have caused, or have the potential to cause, dangerous levels of beryllium in the ambient air are covered by the Beryllium NESHAP. This information is being collected to ensure compliance with 40 CFR part 61,

464

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

40174 Federal Register 40174 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 11, 2009 / Notices Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The Designated Federal Officer and the Chairman of the Committee will lead the meeting for the orderly conduct of business. If you would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Elena Melchert at the address or telephone number listed above. You must make your request for an oral statement at least five business days prior to the meeting, and reasonable provisions will be made to include the presentation on the agenda. Public comment will follow the 5 minute rule.

465

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29 Federal Register 29 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 212 / Friday, November 2, 2007 / Notices ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER-FRL-6692-6] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 202-564-7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 6, 2007 (72 FR 17156). DRAFT EISs EIS No. 20070286, ERP No. D-BLM- J65331-WY, Kemmerer Field Office Planning Area, Resource Management

466

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

44 Federal Register 44 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 29, 2008 / Notices toll-free, (866) 208-3676 or TTY, (202) 502-8659. Specifically, Columbia Gulf proposes to design and construct three 20-inch side taps and various appurtenant facilities on its existing Line Nos. 100, 200, and 300, including electronic flow measurement and telemetry, overpressure protection equipment, and approximately 300 feet of interconnecting pipeline of varying size. Columbia Gulf estimates the cost of construction to be $980,000, with all costs associated with the facilities to be reimbursed by KMLP. Columbia Gulf states that the new point of interconnection will provide Columbia Gulf with the ability to receive up to 1,500 MMcf/d of revaporized LNG from KMLP into Columbia Gulf's natural gas

467

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

44 Federal Register 44 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2011 / Notices source reduction activities (Part II: Sec. 8.10, 8.10.1-4). * Remove the ''Yes'' box and enlarge the text section for the question on optional pollution prevention information (Part II: Section 8.11). Rationale: The current form requests information on ''any source reduction activities for this chemical during the reporting year;'' but the Reporting Forms and Instructions request information on ''newly implemented'' source reduction activities. These form changes will remove this difference, allow facilities to distinguish between new and ongoing source reduction activities, and provide additional optional information on source reduction, recycling, or pollution control activities on the form itself (in