Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Supplemental design requirements document, Project W026. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document supplements and extends the Functional Design Criteria, SP-W026-FDC-001, for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility (WRAP), Module 1. It provides additional detailed requirements, summarizes key Westinghouse Hanford Company design guidance, and establishes baseline technical agreements to be used in definitive design of the WRAP-1 facility. Revision 3 of the Supplemental Design Requirements Document has been assigned an Impact Level of 3ESQ based on the content of the entire revision. The actual changes made from Revision 2 have an Impact Level of 3S and the basis for these changes was previously reviewed and approved per WHC correspondence No. 9355770.

Weidert, J.R.

1993-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

2

Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents, May 2009 (Revised) (Book)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

www.femp.energy.gov ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program Revised June 2013 DOE/GO-102009-2588 UESCs: Enabling Documents 1 Department of Energy Washington, D.C. Dear Colleagues, The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is pleased to present this third edition of Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents. These documents provide a selected set of background information materials that clarify the authority for Federal agencies to enter into utility energy services

3

Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents, May 2009 (Revised) (Book)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

www.femp.energy.gov ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program Revised June 2013 DOE/GO-102009-2588 UESCs: Enabling Documents 1 Department of Energy Washington, D.C. Dear Colleagues, The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is pleased to present this third edition of Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents. These documents provide a selected set of background information materials that clarify the authority for Federal agencies to enter into utility energy services

4

Guidance document for revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides guidance for the revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, ``Radioactive Waste Management.`` Technical Working Groups have been established and are responsible for writing the revised order. The Technical Working Groups will use this document as a reference for polices and procedures that have been established for the revision process. The overall intent of this guidance is to outline how the order will be revised and how the revision process will be managed. In addition, this document outlines technical issues considered for inclusion by a Department of Energy Steering Committee.

Kudera, D.E.; McMurtrey, C.D.; Meagher, B.G.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

5

Project Document The Transboundary Protected Areas Research Initiative  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

projects and mobilised international private sector investment. In effect, the South African governmentProject Document The Transboundary Protected Areas Research Initiative A joint initiative of Centre The Transboundary Protected Areas Research Initiative (the Initiative) was founded by a core partnership consisting

6

WP-07 IP Studies & Documentation (wp07/initial)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Initial Proposal Studies and Documentation were provided to rate case parties on CD-ROM at the Prehearing Conference and filed with the hearing clerk via the Rate Case Parties...

7

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory installation roadmap document. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The roadmapping process was initiated by the US Department of Energy`s office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) to improve its Five-Year Plan and budget allocation process. Roadmap documents will provide the technical baseline for this planning process and help EM develop more effective strategies and program plans for achieving its long-term goals. This document is a composite of roadmap assumptions and issues developed for the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) by US Department of Energy Idaho Field Office and subcontractor personnel. The installation roadmap discusses activities, issues, and installation commitments that affect waste management and environmental restoration activities at the INEL. The High-Level Waste, Land Disposal Restriction, and Environmental Restoration Roadmaps are also included.

Not Available

1993-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

8

CSMRI DOCUMENT REPOSITORY INDEX Revised June 15, 2007  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.M. Stoller Corporation May 12, 2006 15 Claypits Investigation - CSMRI The S.M. Stoller Corporation November. Title Author Publication Date 26 Colorado School of Mines Research Institute Site ­ Revised Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study and Proposed Plan The S.M. Stoller Corporation May 2007 2006 SITE INVESTIGATION

9

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory installation roadmap assumptions document. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a composite of roadmap assumptions developed for the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) by the US Department of Energy Idaho Field Office and subcontractor personnel as a key element in the implementation of the Roadmap Methodology for the INEL Site. The development and identification of these assumptions in an important factor in planning basis development and establishes the planning baseline for all subsequent roadmap analysis at the INEL.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Document last revised July 2010 1 Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online www.cteco.uconn.edu  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Document last revised July 2010 1 Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online ­ www (POSM) project. It does not include parcel data from towns located along the Connecticut coastline since July 2010 2 Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online ­ www.cteco.uconn.edu (the assessor's database

Holsinger, Kent

11

Technical support document for proposed revision of the model energy code thermal envelope requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the council of American Building Officials' (CABO) 1993 supplement to the 1992 Model Energy Code (MEC) (referred to as the 1993 MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for single-family and low-rise multifamily residences. The goal of this analysis was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determined the most cost-effective (least total life-cycle cost [LCC]) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) for residences in different locations. The ECMs with the lowest LCC were used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U[sub o]-value (thermal transmittance) curves in the MEC format. The changes proposed here affect the requirements for group R'' residences. The group R residences are detached one- and two-family dwellings (referred to as single-family) and all other residential buildings three stories or less (referred to as multifamily).

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

12

Technical support document for proposed revision of the model energy code thermal envelope requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the council of American Building Officials` (CABO) 1993 supplement to the 1992 Model Energy Code (MEC) (referred to as the 1993 MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for single-family and low-rise multifamily residences. The goal of this analysis was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determined the most cost-effective (least total life-cycle cost [LCC]) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) for residences in different locations. The ECMs with the lowest LCC were used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U{sub o}-value (thermal transmittance) curves in the MEC format. The changes proposed here affect the requirements for ``group R`` residences. The group R residences are detached one- and two-family dwellings (referred to as single-family) and all other residential buildings three stories or less (referred to as multifamily).

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

13

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. In addition to updating previous information, Revision 1 adds citations from the NRC Inspection Manual and the Improved Standard Technical Specifications. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Generic Letters, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Ankrum, A.; Nickolaus, J.; Vinther, R.; Maguire-Moffitt, N.; Hammer, J.; Sherfey, L.; Warner, R. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

14

IDC System Specification Document.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains the system specifications derived to satisfy the system requirements found in the IDC System Requirements Document for the IDC Reengineering Phase 2 project. Revisions Version Date Author/Team Revision Description Authorized by V1.0 12/2014 IDC Reengineering Project Team Initial delivery M. Harris

Clifford, David J.

2014-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

15

Technical support document for proposed 1994 revision of the MEC thermal envelope requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the Council of American Building Officials` (CABO) 1994 supplement to the 1993 Model Energy Code (MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for maximum component U{sub 0}-value. The 1994 amendments to the 1993 MEC were established in last year`s code change cycle and did not change the envelope requirements. The research underlying the proposed MEC revision was conducted by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) for the US Department of Energy (DOE) Building Energy Standards program. The goal of this research was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determines the most cost-effective (least total cost) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) (insulation levels and window types) for residential buildings. This least-cost set of ECMs was used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U{sub 0}-values (thermal transmittances). ECMs include window types (for example, double-pane vinyl) and insulation levels (for example, R-19) for ceilings, walls, and floors.

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

34 Federal Register 34 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Notices public an opportunity to comment on the Guidance Memoranda prior to their approval. On May 6, 2005, a Notice of Availability was placed in the Federal Register (70 FR 24008) inviting the public to comment on the final draft of the Guidance Memoranda. As a result of public comment we received on the final draft, we have revised the Guidance Memoranda and invite the public to comment on the revised final draft. The programmatic regulations also require the concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior and the Governor of Florida on the Guidance Memoranda prior to their approval. An electronic copy of the guidance memoranda document is available at: http:// www.evergladesplan.org/pm/

17

Document  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5/R3 5/R3 Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Terrestrial Plants: 1997 Revision This document has been approved by the East Tennessee Technology Park Technical Information Office for release to the public. Date: ES/ER/TM-85/R3 Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Terrestrial Plants: 1997 Revision R. A. Efroymson M. E. Will G. W. Suter II A. C. Wooten Date Issued-November 1997 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management under budget and reporting code EW 20 LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. managing the Environmental Management Activities at the East Tennessee Technology Park Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Oak Ridge National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant

18

Revised: 10.08.2012 Bb 9(SP13): Adding a Document p. 1 of 4 Adding a Syllabus  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised: 10.08.2012 Bb 9(SP13): Adding a Document p. 1 of 4 Adding a Syllabus Posting course(SP13): Adding a Document p. 2 of 4 3. Click Build Content and a drop down menu will appear. Under.08.2012 Bb 9(SP13): Adding a Document p. 3 of 4 2. The Link Title is an option and allows you rename the link

Qiu, Weigang

19

DOCUMENT RELEASE FORM  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Change El Complete Revision (6) Document Title: Visual Inspection Plan for Single-Shell Tanks and Double-Shell Tanks (7) ChangeRelease Initial Release Description: (8) Change NA...

20

Control of External Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Control of External Documents Process 11_0304 Page 1 of 5 2 Control of External Documents Process 11_0304 Page 1 of 5 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: Control of External Documents Process Document Number P-002 Rev 11_0304 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: Q-001, Quality Manual Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): REG-002, External Document Register P-002 Control of External Documents Process 11_0304 Page 2 of 5 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 11_0304 Changed revision format from alpha character to numbers; modified process to include a step directing addition to REG-002 External Document Register and changed verbiage to clarify and more accurately reflect current process.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Safety System Oversight Program Assessment Criteria and Review Approach Document (CRAD), Revision 0  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of 7 of 7 Safety System Oversight (SSO) Program Implementation Assessment Criteria and Review Approach Documents (CRADs) Revision 0 PROGRAM (PGM) OBJECTIVE PGM.1 An effective SSO Program is established by the Field Element Manager to apply engineering expertise to maintain safety system configuration and to assess system condition and effectiveness of safety management program implementation. Criteria PGM.1.1 The SSO Qualification Program is part of the Technical Qualification Program (DOE M 426.1-1A, Chapter III, Section 1, 2.b (1)). PGM.1.2 The SSO Program establishes appropriate training, qualification, and performance requirements for SSO personnel and the supervisors are held accountable for achieving them (DOE M 426.1-1A, Chapter III, Section 1, 2.b

22

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

-2 -2 Processing Inactive Records Revised Version Issued as P 200.2-2B LM Procedure 200.2-2A, Processing Internal Inactive Records for Storage of 7/18/07, has undergone revision. The revised procedure includes updated references, definitions, and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.2-2A with LM Procedure 200.2-2B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. Procedure 200.2-2B INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 10 pages, 4 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

23

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4-1 4-1 Records Management Self-Assessment Revised Version Issued as P200.4-1B LM Procedure 200.4-1, Records Management Self-Assessment of 4/17/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.4-1A with LM Procedure 200.4-1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 8 pages, 2 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

24

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes Summary of Changes to Procedure 243.1 Records Inventory Revised Version Issued as P 243.1B LM Procedure 243.1A, Records Inventory of 7/18/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and to ensure the references cited and associated forms remain current. Please replace LM Procedure 243.1A with LM Procedure 243.1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 9 pages, 3 attachments

25

Technical support document: Survey data used in revising the energy conservation requirements in the manufactured home construction and safety standards  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents data used in the development of revised energy conservation standards for manufactured housing. The approach used in developing the proposed standard revision is a cost-benefit analysis in which the costs of energy conservation measures (ECM) are balanced against the benefits of energy savings. The analysis used to develop the recommendations for revision of the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) energy conservation standards for manufactured housing requires information on specific ECMs. This technical support document contains the data from two of the three surveys that were used primarily to characterize the available ECMs and their associated costs. The analyses of these data are provided in separate reports. 5 refs.

Lee, A.D.; Conner, C.C.

1992-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 Federal Register 8 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 233 / Monday, December 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 1 A discussion of NEPA applicability is beyond the scope of this guidance. For more information see CEQ, The Citizen's Guide to the National Environmental Policy Act, available at ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/Citizens_Guide_Dec07.pdf. 2 For more information on this announcement, see http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ ceq/initiatives/nepa. 3 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Draft Guidance, Establishing, Applying, and Revising Categorical Exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act, 75 FR 8045, Feb. 23, 2010. COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 40 CFR Parts 1500, 1501, 1502, 1503, 1504, 1505, 1506, 1507, and 1508 Final Guidance for Federal Departments and Agencies on

27

Documentation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Documentation has a bad reputation among software developers. Just mention documentation, and those of us who were raised on traditional waterfall software project methods remember weighty requirements docum...

Patrick Cimolini; Karen Cannell

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

28

Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Discovery of Uranium Discovery of Uranium Uranium was discovered in 1789 by Martin Klaproth, a German chemist, who isolated an oxide of uranium while analyzing pitchblende samples from the Joachimsal silver mines in the former Kingdom of Bohemia located in the present day Czech Republic. more facts >> Mailing List Signup Receive e-mail updates about this project and web site. your e-mail address Sign Me Up Search: OK Button DUF6 Guide DU Uses DUF6 Management and Uses DUF6 Conversion EIS Documents News FAQs Internet Resources Glossary Home » Documents Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Depleted UF6 Management Program Documents Downloadable documents about depleted UF6 management and related topics, including Depleted UF6 Conversion and Programmatic EIS documents

29

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

459 Federal Register 459 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations PART 952-SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES ■ 15. The authority citation for part 952 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 2282a; 2282b; 2282c; 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq. ■ 16. Section 952.247-70 is amended by: ■ a. Revising the date of the clause to read as set forth below; and ■ b. Removing ''or its successor Official Foreign Travel, or any subsequent version of the order'' in the clause and adding in its place ''Official Foreign Travel, or its successor''. The revision reads as follows: 952.247-70 Foreign travel. * * * * * FOREIGN TRAVEL JUN 2010 * * * * * PARTS 928, 931, 932, 933, 936, 937, 941, 942, 950, 951, and 952

30

Documents  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

documents en MHK LCOE Reporting documents en MHK LCOE Reporting Guidance Draft http://en.openei.org/community/document/mhk-lcoe-reporting-guidance-draft To normalize competing claims of LCOE, DOE has developed-for its own use-a standardized cost and performance data reporting process to facilitate uniform calculation of LCOE from MHK device developers. This standardization framework is only the first version in what is anticipated to be an iterative process that involves industry and the broader DOE stakeholder community. Multiple files are attached here for review and comment.document/mhk-lcoe-reporting-guidance-draft" target="_blank">read more http://en.openei.org/community/document/mhk-lcoe-reporting-guidance-draft#comments

31

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

558 Federal Register 558 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 203 / Thursday, October 22, 2009 / Notices If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339. VIII. Other Information Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed under For Further Information Contact in Section VII of this notice. Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ fedregister. To use PDF, you must have Adobe

32

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

58 Federal Register 58 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 207 / Friday, October 24, 2008 / Notices 1 Public Law No. 101-552, section 3, as amended by Public Law 104-320, section 4(a); see 5 U.S.C. 571 note. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Alternative Dispute Resolution AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Revised Policy Statement. SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. 571 et seq. Today, DOE issues a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment

33

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

44 Federal Register 44 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2011 / Notices not anticipate recurrence of violations that gave rise to this PDL. As a result, under the authority in 20 U.S.C. 1234a(j), the Department has determined that compromise of this claim to $675,000 is appropriate. The public is invited to comment on the Department's intent to compromise this claim. Additional information may be obtained by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ fedregister. To use PDF you must have

34

Supporting documentation for the 1997 revision to the DOE Insulation Fact Sheet  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) Insulation Fact Sheet has been revised to reflect developments in energy conservation technology and the insulation market. A nationwide insulation cost survey was made by polling insulation contractors and builders, and the results are reported here. These costs, along with regional weather data, regional fuel costs, and fuel-specific system efficiencies were used to produce recommended insulation levels for new and existing houses. This report contains all of the methodology, algorithms, assumptions, references, and data resources that were used to produce the 1997 DOE Insulation Fact Sheet.

Stovall, T.K.

1997-08-22T23:59:59.000Z

35

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

69 69 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2002 / Notices NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-302] Florida Power Corporation; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted the request of Florida Power Corporation (the licensee) to withdraw its August 14, 2002, application for proposed amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-72 for Crystal River, Unit No. 2, located in Citrus County, Florida. The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical Specifications pertaining to two inoperable control complex chillers. The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment published in

36

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

28 Federal Register 28 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2011 / Notices information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any agency's ability to perform its statutory obligations. The Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the information collection. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5)

37

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

49 Federal Register 49 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Notices with any agency's ability to perform its statutory obligations. The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes that notice containing proposed information collection requests prior to submission of these requests to OMB. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment.

38

Document  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

988 Federal Register 988 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rulemakings. In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to http:// www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm. Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the Commission's calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/ EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related information.

39

Document  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

project for an award of financial assistance through a competitive process under the Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) Program. AEP's Mountaineer Commercial Scale Carbon Capture...

40

Document Control Template-Process  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1_ADocument Control Template - Process.doc Page 1 of 7 1_ADocument Control Template - Process.doc Page 1 of 7 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: Document Control Template - Process Document Number: F-001 Rev. A Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: P-001, Document Control Process Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): N/A F-001_ADocument Control Template - Process.doc Page 2 of 7 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release B C D E F-001_ADocument Control Template - Process.doc Page 3 of 7 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: DocTitle Document Number: P-DocID# Rev Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: David McKay Approver(s): Dennis Murphy Parent Document:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Supplemental design requirements document, Multifunction Waste Tank Facility, Project W-236A. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility (MWTF) consists of four, nominal 1 million gallon, underground double-shell tanks, located in the 200-East area, and two tanks of the same capacity in the 200-West area. MWTF will provide environmentally safe storage capacity for wastes generated during remediation/retrieval activities of existing waste storage tanks. This document delineates in detail the information to be used for effective implementation of the Functional Design Criteria requirements.

Groth, B.D.

1995-01-11T23:59:59.000Z

42

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 9, 2006 Part III Department of Energy 10 CFR Parts 600 and 603 Assistance Regulations; Final Rule VerDate Aug2005 17:47 May 08, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09MYR3.SGM 09MYR3 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES3 27158 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Parts 600 and 603 RIN 1991-AB72 Assistance Regulations AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is adopting, with minor changes, the interim final rule published on November 15, 2005, that established a new part to the DOE assistance regulations and revised 10 CFR part 600, subpart A to conform with the new part. The new part establishes policies and

43

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

69 69 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2002 / Rules and Regulations and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: March 12, 2002. Peter Caulkins, Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows: PART 180-[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346(a) and 371. § 180.434 [Amended] 2. In § 180.434, amend the table in paragraph (b) by revising the ''Expiration/revocation date'' ''12/31/ 01'' for the commodity ''Blueberrries'' to read ''12/31/03.'' [FR Doc. 02-7494 Filed 3-27-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 48 CFR Parts 902, 904, 909, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 925, 931, 933, 950, 952,

44

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

68720 68720 Vol. 74, No. 248 Tuesday, December 29, 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 1021 Request for Information Regarding Categorical Exclusions AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) intends to update its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) categorical exclusions, and seeks input from interested parties to help identify activities that should be considered for new or revised categorical exclusions. DATES: Responses should be e-mailed or postmarked by January 25, 2010. Late responses will be considered to the extent practicable. ADDRESSES: E-mail submissions are encouraged due to the delivery time required for mail, and should be sent to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov. Alternatively, submissions may be faxed

45

Document:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 FUNDAMENTAL MODE FREQUENCY OF THE STORAGE RING SINGLE CELL CAVITY May 6, 1992 Revised May 27, 1992 Yoon W. Kang RF Group Advanced Photon Source The fundamental mode frequency of the prototype storage ring cavity has been measured with various port terminations and cavity temperatures. Since the highest tuned frequency of the prototype cavity with a tuner under the high RF power test condition is measured to be lower than the system specified frequency, a slight dimensional change in the cavity design is required for manufacturing future cavities. In addition to this, an extra dimensional correction is required to compensate the volume changes due to the tuner position and increased port sizes. In the fol- lowing, the measured frequencies and the estimated frequency shift due to the volume changes

46

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

37 Federal Register 37 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 10, 2008 / Rules and Regulations PART 762-GUARANTEED FARM LOANS I 1. The authority citation for part 762 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1989. § 762.148 [Amended] I 2. Amend § 762.148(d)(1) by removing the second sentence. I 3. Amend § 762.149 by revising paragraphs (b)(1) introductory text, (b)(1)(v), (d) introductory text, (d)(2), (i)(1), and (i)(5) to read as set forth below. § 762.149 Liquidation. * * * * * (b) * * * (1) Within 150 days after the payment due date, all lenders will prepare a liquidation plan. Standard eligible and CLP lenders will submit a written liquidation plan to the Agency which includes: * * * * * (v) An estimated loss claim must be filed no later than 150 days past the

47

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

72 72 TITLE 28-JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1495 EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 97-164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97-164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. § 1495. Damages for unjust conviction and im- prisonment; claim against United States The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim for damages by any person unjustly convicted of an offense against the United States and imprisoned. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 97-164, title I, § 133(c)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 102-572, title IX, § 902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on section 729 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed.,

48

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 7, 2005 July 7, 2005 Part II Department of Energy 10 CFR Part 625 Price Competitive Sale of Strategic Petroleum Reserve Petroleum; Standard Sales Provisions; Final Rule VerDate jul2003 19:47 Jul 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\07JYR2.SGM 07JYR2 39364 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 625 RIN 1901-AB15 Price Competitive Sale of Strategic Petroleum Reserve Petroleum; Standard Sales Provisions AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule; revised appendix. SUMMARY: On December 21, 1983, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a final rule governing the price competitive sales of petroleum from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) in the event that the SPR

49

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 Federal Register 3 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 14 / Friday, January 23, 2009 / Notices 1 The GAP Material addressed in this Revised Record of Decision also includes certain non-U.S.- origin unirradiated fuel (fresh fuel) containing HEU. ADDRESSES: Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and Conference Center; 5701 Marinelli Road, North Bethesda, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Perine, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, Germantown Building, Independence Avenue, Washington, DC 20585; Telephone: (301) 903-3081. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is to provide advice and guidance with respect to the basic energy sciences research program. Tentative Agenda: Agenda will include discussions of the following:

50

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

69 Federal Register 69 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 140 / Friday, July 21, 2006 / Rules and Regulations GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 41 CFR Parts 101-48 and 102-41 [FPMR Amendment 2006-05; FPMR Case 2004-101-1; FMR Case 2004-102-2] RIN 3090-AH11 Federal Property Management Regulations; Disposition of Seized, Forfeited, Voluntarily Abandoned, and Unclaimed Personal Property AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services Administration (GSA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is amending the Federal Property Management Regulations (FPMR) by revising coverage on utilization, donation, or disposal of abandoned and forfeited personal property and moving it into the Federal Management Regulation (FMR). A cross-reference is added to the FPMR

51

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 Federal Register 0 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/ news/fedregister. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ index.html. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a; 21 U.S.C. 862(a)(1). Dated: November 10, 2010. James F. Manning, Chief of Staff, Federal Student Aid, U.S. Department of Education. [FR Doc. 2010-28856 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [OE Docket No. PP-371]

52

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

667 Federal Register 667 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 3, 2009 / Notices Part 1 Chapter 3 of the TGDC Recommendations, with the exception of Chapter 3's performance benchmark requirements. Part 1 Chapter 3 of the TGDC Recommendations is primarily a maintenance level upgrade to the 2005 VVSG with minor modifications, clarifications, and a few additions including performance and poll worker usability requirements. (The VSS 2002 contained almost no usability, accessibility, and privacy requirements. As a result, the 2005 VVSG Section 3 was mostly new material based on research, best practices, and standards relating to human factors and the design of user interfaces as they apply to voting systems.) 7. System Security Documentation Requirements-Security documentation

53

Addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document constitutes an addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 0), April 2011.

Patrick Matthews and Christy Sloop

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

54

Test and evaluation document for DOT Specification 7A Type A Packaging. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has been conducting, through several of its operating contractors, an evaluation and testing program to qualify Type A radioactive material packagings per US Department of Transportation (DOT) Specification 7A (DOT-7A) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 49, Part 178 (49 CFR 178). The program is currently administered by the DOE, Office of Facility Safety Analysis, DOE/EH-32, at DOE-Headquarters (DOE-HQ) in Germantown, Maryland. This document summarizes the evaluation and testing performed for all of the packagings successfully qualified in this program.

NONE

1996-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

55

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22 Federal Register 22 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Notices wildlife resources, including protected species; cultural resources; and other impacts identified through scoping, public involvement and interagency coordination. f. Scoping: An initial scoping letter was sent to stakeholders in the southwest Florida region in April, 2006, as notification of the initiation of a Feasibility Study to address the water resource problems in southwest Florida. An additional scoping letter will be used to invite comments on alternatives and issues from Federal, State, and local agencies, affected Indian tribes, and other interested private organizations and individuals. g. DEIS Preparation: The integrated Feasibility Report, including a DEIS, is

56

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

52841 52841 Vol. 67, No. 157 Wednesday, August 14, 2002 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Federal Crop Insurance Corporation 7 CFR Part 457 Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Sugarcane Crop Insurance Provisions AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA. ACTION: Final rule; correction. SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final rule, Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Sugarcane Crop Insurance Provisions that the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation published in the Federal Register on Friday, July 12, 2002 (67 FR 46093- 46096). EFFECTIVE DATE: August 14, 2002. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arden Routh, Risk Management Specialist, Product Development Division, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, United States Department of Agriculture, 6501 Beacon Drive,

57

U.S. Department of Energy, Carlsbad Area Office quality assurance program document. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Mission of the Carlsbad Area Office (CAO) is to protect human health and the environment by opening and operating the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for safe disposal of TRU waste, and establishing an effective system for management of TRU waste from generation to disposal. To help in fulfilling this mission and to ensure that risks and environmental impacts are identified and minimized, and that safety, reliability, and performance are optimized, CAO`s policy is to establish and maintain an effective quality assurance (QA) program that supports compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local regulations, and DOE orders and requirements. This document establishes QA program requirements for all programs, projects, and activities sponsored by CAO.

NONE

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

58

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

79 Federal Register 79 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices of a portion of National Guard Avenue to meet recommended stand-off distance between perimeter fence and mission critical resources and personnel). The decision was based on matters discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Proposed Realignment of National Guard Avenue and New Main Gate Construction, inputs from the public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final EIS was made available to the public on August 13, 2010 through a NOA in the Federal Register (Volume 75, Number 156, Page 49487) with a wait period that ended on September 14, 2010. The ROD documents only the decision of the Air Force with respect to the proposed Air Force actions analyzed

59

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 79 / Thursday, April 24, 2003 / Notices j. Deadline for filing comments and/ or motions: May 19, 2003. All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with: Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Please include the project number (P- 10855-005) on any comments or motions filed. k. Description of Request: Upper Peninsula Power Company (UPPCO) proposes to add additional acreage to the project boundary in the area of the Emergency Fuse Plug. The additional acres are necessary for project operations. l. Location of the Application: A copy of the application is available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference Room,

60

Document  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

July 2, 2008 Part V The President Executive Order 13467-Reforming Processes Related to Suitability for Government Employment, Fitness for Contractor Employees, and Eligibility for Access to Classified National Security Information VerDate Aug2005 18:32 Jul 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\02JYE0.SGM 02JYE0 hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS2 VerDate Aug2005 18:32 Jul 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\02JYE0.SGM 02JYE0 hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS2 Presidential Documents 38103 Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 128 Wednesday, July 2, 2008 Title 3- The President Executive Order 13467 of June 30, 2008 Reforming Processes Related to Suitability for Government Employment, Fitness for Contractor Employees, and Eligi-

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Document  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

44786 Federal Register 44786 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 148 / Thursday, July 31, 2008 / Notices same file as the submission itself, and not as separate files. Petitions will be available for public inspection by appointment with the staff of the USTR Public Reading Room, except for information granted ''business confidential'' status pursuant to 15 CFR 2003.6. If the submission contains business confidential information, a non-confidential version of the submission must also be submitted that indicates where confidential information was redacted by inserting asterisks where material was deleted. In addition, the confidential submission must be clearly marked ''BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL'' in large, bold letters at the top and bottom of every page of the documents. The public version that does not contain

62

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Federal Register 2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2011 / Notices it is recommended that documents be transmitted by overnight mail, by electronic mail to Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov, or by facsimile to 202-586-8008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Lawrence (Program Office) 202-586-5260. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exports of electricity from the United States to a foreign country are regulated by the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to sections 301(b) and 402(f) of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7151(b), 7172(f)) and require authorization under section 202(e) of the FPA (16 U.S.C.824a(e)). On August 31, 1999 the Department of Energy (DOE) issued Order No. EA-216, which authorized TEMUS to transmit electric energy from the United States to

63

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

586 586 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 1999 / Notices Telephone: (202) 205-9817. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1- 800-877-8339. However, the Department is not able to reproduce in an alternate format the standard forms included in the application package. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sylvia Johnson, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW. (room 3318, Switzer Building), Washington, DC 20202-2649. Telephone (202) 205-9312. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1- 800-877-8339. Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print,

64

Document  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

May 22, 2000 Part III Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 261 Regulatory Determination on Wastes from the Combustion of Fossil Fuels; Final Rule VerDate 112000 16:01 May 19, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\22MYR3.SGM pfrm02 PsN: 22MYR3 32214 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 99 / Monday, May 22, 2000 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 261 [FRL-6588-1] RIN 2050-AD91 Notice of Regulatory Determination on Wastes From the Combustion of Fossil Fuels AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Regulatory determination. SUMMARY: This document explains EPA's determination of whether regulation of fossil fuel combustion wastes is warranted under subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Today's action

65

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

945 Federal Register 945 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices 1 The full text of the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage is available at http://www.iaea.org/Publication/ Documents/Infircs/1998/infcirc567.shtml. A detailed interpretation of the CSC and its provisions is contained in ''The 1997 Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage and the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage-Explanatory Texts,'' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (''Explanatory Texts''). International Law Series No. 3 (2007). The Explanatory Texts is available at http://www- pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/ Pub1279_web.pdf . 2 SDR is the unit of account defined by the International Monetary Fund (''IMF'') and used by

66

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

51 Federal Register 51 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2011 / Notices VII. Agency Contact See chart in the Award Information section in this notice for the name, room number and telephone number of the contact person for each competition. You can write to the contact person at the following address: U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2600. If you use a TDD, call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800- 877-8339. VIII. Other Information Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the Grants and Contracts

67

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

902 Federal Register 902 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 15 / Monday, January 25, 2010 / Notices including Comments Resolution Matrixes (CRMs) and track changed documents, will be posted at: http:// www.losangeles.af.mil/library/ factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9364. Please send all CRM comments to Vimal Gopal by 5 February 2010. DATES: 12 February 2010: IS-GPS-200E. 8 a.m.-12 p.m. (Pacific Time). Dial-In Information: Phone: 1-800- FON-SAIC (1-800-366-7242). Code: 4511074. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vimal Gopal, vimal.gopal.ctr@losangeles.af.mil, 1- 310-909-7294 or Captain Neal Roach, neal.roach@losangeles.af.mil, 1-310- 653-3771. Bao-Anh Trinh, Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 2010-1273 Filed 1-22-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-05-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

68

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

945 Federal Register 945 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices 1 The full text of the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage is available at http://www.iaea.org/Publication/ Documents/Infircs/1998/infcirc567.shtml. A detailed interpretation of the CSC and its provisions is contained in ''The 1997 Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage and the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage-Explanatory Texts,'' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (''Explanatory Texts''). International Law Series No. 3 (2007). The Explanatory Texts is available at http://www- pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/ Pub1279_web.pdf . 2 SDR is the unit of account defined by the International Monetary Fund (''IMF'') and used by

69

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

197 Federal Register 197 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 117 / Friday, June 19, 2009 / Notices Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings. Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/ Information Management Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 22209-2133. Dated: May 31, 2009.

70

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 10 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations § 5502.105 Agency procedures. (a) The designated agency ethics official or, with the concurrence of the designated agency ethics official, each of the separate agency components of HHS listed in § 5501.102(a) of this chapter may prescribe procedures for the submission and review of each report filed under this part. These procedures may provide for filing extensions, for good cause shown, totaling not more than 90 days. (b) For good cause, the designated agency ethics official may extend the reporting deadlines for reports required under this part during the initial implementation phase for any reporting requirement, without regard to the 90 day maximum specified in paragraph (a)

71

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21 Federal Register 21 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules republication, the NRC will not initiate a second comment period on this action in the event the direct final rule is withdrawn. A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if: (1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient to require a substantive response in a notice-and- comment process. For example, a substantive response is required when: (a) The comment causes the NRC staff to reevaluate (or reconsider) its position or conduct additional analysis;

72

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 Federal Register 6 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Notices 33 TMCnet, Consumer Interface with the Smart Grid, http://sip-trunking.tmcnet.com/news/2010/ 02/09/4613238.htm (last visited Apr. 27, 2010) existing implementations of these requirements. List of Questions for Commenters The following list of questions represents a preliminary attempt to identify and respond to the issues that have been raised in a variety of public and private forums, including but limited to: DOE's historic investment in Smart Grid technology through the Smart Grid Investment Grants and the Smart Grid Demonstrations projects; Smart Grid Forum blog initiated by the Office of Science and Technology policy titled ''Consumer Interface with the Smart Grid 33 ''; and the National

73

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Department of Energy § 782.5 PART 782-CLAIMS FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT Subpart A-General Sec. 782.1 Purpose. 782.2 Objectives. 782.3 Authority. Subpart B-Requirements and Procedures 782.5 Contents of communication initiating claim. 782.6 Processing of administrative claims. 782.7 Incomplete notice of infringement. 782.8 Indirect notice of infringement. AUTHORITY: Dept. of Energy Organization Act; sec. 651, 91 Stat. 601, 42 U.S.C. 7261; Atomic Energy Act of 1954; sec. 107(d), 88 Stat. 1241, 42 U.S.C. 5817(d); sec. 161(g), 80 Stat. 443, 42 U.S.C. 2201(g); sec. 172, 62 Stat. 933, 42 U.S.C. 2223; Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, sec. 2356, 75 Stat. 440, 22 U.S.C. 2356; Pat- ents, Invention Secrecy Act; sec. 183, 66 Stat. 4, 35 U.S.C. 183; Judiciary and Judical Proce-

74

Golden Reading Room: Office of Acquisition Documents, Better Buildings Initiative Support Services  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Below are electronic versions of Golden Field Office Reading Room documents that were created after November 1, 1996, per the requirements of the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendment of...

75

Document Control Template-Form  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Publication Review and Approval 11_0608.doc608 Page 1 of 3 4 Publication Review and Approval 11_0608.doc608 Page 1 of 3 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Publication Review and Approval Document Number: ITTF-014 Rev. 11_0608 Document Owner: Ben Aragon Backup Owner: Janet Lee Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: ITTP-015 Website Development Maintenance Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): N/A ITTF-014 Publication Review and Approval 11_0608.doc608 Page 2 of 3 Revision History: Rev. Description of Changes A Initial Release 08_0523 Added review section for QA. Added "Approved w/changes" section. Changed "Corrections" and "Reason" to "Recommendations". Adjusted spacing on document. 08_1105 Added review section for Project Manager. Adjusted spacing on document.

76

Document Control Template-Form  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Key Check-Out Form 10_0823 Page 1 of 3 2 Key Check-Out Form 10_0823 Page 1 of 3 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Key Check-Out Form Document Number: MGTF-012 Rev. 10_0823 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: MGTP-003, Control of Customer Property Notify of Changes: MGT, ADM Referenced Document(s): N/A MGTF-012 Key Check-Out Form 10_0823 Page 2 of 3 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change 10_0823 Initial Release MGTF-012 Key Check-Out Form 10_0823 NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Emergency Operations Training Academy Key Check-Out Form Name: Initial Suite Key: Date returned: Furniture Key: Date returned: Building Key: Date returned: Other Key(s): Date returned:

77

Document Control Template-Form  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Equipment Check-Out Form 08_0411 Page 1 of 3 7 Equipment Check-Out Form 08_0411 Page 1 of 3 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Equipment Check-Out Form Document Number: MGTF-007 Rev. 08_0411 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: MGTP-003, Control of Customer Property Notify of Changes: MGT, ADM Referenced Document(s): N/A MGTF-007 Equipment Check-Out Form 08_0411 Page 2 of 3 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 08_0411 Footer removed as document is for internal use only MGTF-007 Equipment Check-Out Form 08_0411 NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Emergency Operations Training Academy EQUIPMENT CHECK-OUT FORM Name: Date taken:

78

Document Control Template-Instruction_Screen Shot  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3_ADocument Control Template - Instruction_Screen Shot.doc_Screen ShotPage 1 of 6 3_ADocument Control Template - Instruction_Screen Shot.doc_Screen ShotPage 1 of 6 EOTA - Business Instruction Document Title: Document Control Template - Instruction-Screen Shot Document Number: F-003 Rev. A Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: P-001, Document Control Process Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): N/A F-003_ADocument Control Template - Instruction_Screen Shot.doc_Screen ShotPage 2 of 6 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release B C D E F-003_ADocument Control Template - Instruction_Screen Shot.doc_Screen ShotPage 3 of 6 EOTA - Business Instruction Document Title: DocTitle Document Number:

79

2007 Wholesale Power Rate Case Initial Proposal : Load Resource Study and Documentation.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Load Resource Study (Study) represents the compilation of the loads, sales, contracts, and resource data necessary for developing BPA wholesale power rates. The results of this Study are used to: (1) provide base data to determine resource costs for the Revenue Requirement Study, WP-07-E-BPA-02; (2) provide regional hydro data for use in the secondary revenue forecast for the Market Power Study, WP-07-E-BPA-03; (3) provide base data to derive billing determinants for the revenue forecast in the Wholesale Power Rate Development Study (WPRDS), WP-07-E-BPA-05; and (4) provide load and resource data for use in calculating risk in the Risk Analysis Study, WP-07-E-BPA-04. This Study provides a synopsis of BPA's load resource analyses. This Study illustrates how each component is completed, how components relate to each other, and how each component fits into the rate development process. Details and results supporting this Study are contained in the Load Resource Documentation, WP-07-E-BPA-01A.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

80

Revised: 6.25.2012 Bb 9: Creating Podcasts & Subscribing in iTunes p. 1 of 6 This document contains step-by-step instructions for using Wimba Podcaster in Blackboard.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised: 6.25.2012 Bb 9: Creating Podcasts & Subscribing in iTunes p. 1 of 6 This document containsTunes" in this document, we mean the iTunes program, not the iTunes store or iTunes U. Preparing to use Wimba Podcaster recording equipment at Hunter College, please see page 5 of this document. To create a podcast episode

Qiu, Weigang

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Savannah River Site mixed waste Proposed Site Treatment Plan (PSTP). Volumes 1 and 2 and reference document: Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE is required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to prepare site treatment plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. This proposed plan contains Savannah River Site`s preferred options and schedules for constructing new facilities, and otherwise obtaining treatment for mixed wastes. The proposed plan consists of 2 volumes. Volume 1, Compliance Plan, identifies the capacity to be developed and the schedules as required. Volume 2, Background, provides a detailed discussion of the preferred options with technical basis, plus a description of the specific waste streams. Chapters are: Introduction; Methodology; Mixed low level waste streams; Mixed transuranic waste; High level waste; Future generation of mixed waste streams; Storage; Process for evaluation of disposal issues in support of the site treatment plans discussions; Treatment facilities and treatment technologies; Offsite waste streams for which SRS treatment is the Preferred Option (Naval reactor wastes); Summary information; and Acronyms and glossary. This revision does not contain the complete revised report, but only those pages that have been revised.

Helmich, E.; Noller, D.K.; Wierzbicki, K.S.; Bailey, L.L.

1995-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

82

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes To Procedure 200.1-5 Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure Revised Version Issued as P 200.1-5B LM Procedure 200.1-5, Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure of 1/19/07, has undergone revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and updates to the attached Plan. Please replace LM Procedure 200.1-5A with LM Procedure 200.1-5B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents.

83

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 563: Septic Systems, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU)563, Septic Systems, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO, 1996; as amended January 2007). The corrective action sites (CASs) for CAU 563 are located in Areas3 and 12 of the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, and are comprised of the following four sites: 03-04-02, Area 3 Subdock Septic Tank 03-59-05, Area 3 Subdock Cesspool 12-59-01, Drilling/Welding Shop Septic Tanks 12-60-01, Drilling/Welding Shop Outfalls The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide the rationale for the recommendation of a corrective action alternative (CAA) for the four CASs within CAU 563. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from July 17 through November 19, 2007, as set forth in the CAU 563 Corrective Action Investigation Plan (NNSA/NSO, 2007). Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against appropriate final action levels (FALs) to identify the contaminants of concern (COCs) for each CAS. The results of the CAI identified COCs at one of the four CASs in CAU 563 and required the evaluation of CAAs. Assessment of the data generated from investigation activities conducted at CAU 563 revealed the following: CASs 03-04-02, 03-59-05, and 12-60-01 do not contain contamination at concentrations exceeding the FALs. CAS 12-59-01 contains arsenic and chromium contamination above FALs in surface and near-surface soils surrounding a stained location within the site. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, review of future and current operations at CAS 12-59-01, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, the following corrective actions are recommended for CAU 563.

Grant Evenson

2008-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

Initial  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Initial operation of a pulse-burst laser system for high-repetition-rate Thomson scattering a... W. S. Harris, 1 D. J. Den Hartog, 1,2 and N. C. Hurst 1 1 Department of Physics,...

85

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0, Including Errata Sheet  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's corrective action alternative recommendation for each of the corrective action sites (CASs) within Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. An evaluation of analytical data from the corrective action investigation, review of current and future operations at each CAS, and a detailed comparative analysis of potential corrective action alternatives were used to determine the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. There are six CASs in CAU 204, which are all located between Areas 1, 2, 3, and 5 on the NTS. The No Further Action alternative was recommended for CASs 01-34-01, 02-34-01, 03-34-01, and 05-99-02; and a Closure in Place with Administrative Controls recommendation was the preferred corrective action for CASs 05-18-02 and 05-33-01. These alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated as well as applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the sites and will eliminate potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated media at CAU 204.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

86

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 560: Septic Systems, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit560 comprises seven corrective action sites (CASs): 03-51-01, Leach Pit 06-04-02, Septic Tank 06-05-03, Leach Pit 06-05-04, Leach Bed 06-59-03, Building CP-400 Septic System 06-59-04, Office Trailer Complex Sewage Pond 06-59-05, Control Point Septic System The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 560 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 7, 2008, through February 24, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit560: Septic Systems, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, and Record of Technical Change No.1. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: Determine whether contaminants of concern (COCs) are present. If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The CAU 560 dataset from the investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the dataset for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. The following contaminants were determined to be present at concentrations exceeding their corresponding FALs: No contamination exceeding the FALs was identified at CASs 03-51-01, 06-04-02, and06-59-04. The soil at the base of the leach pit chamber at CAS06-05-03 contains arsenic above the FAL of 23 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs) above the FAL of 0.74 mg/kg, confined vertically from a depth of approximately 5 to 20 feet (ft) below ground surface. The contamination is confined laterally to the walls of the leach pit chamber and leach rock. The contamination present at CAS 06-05-03 within the leach pit was not feasible to remove. The surface and subsurface soils within and surrounding the septic system at CAS 06-05-04 contained PCB concentrations above the FAL of 0.74 mg/kg. Thelateral and vertical extent of COCs was determined for this CAS. Contaminated soils were removed up to within 18 ft of the building. The remaining contamination is confined to subsurface soils adjacent to and beneath BuildingCP-162 and was not feasible to remove. The solid materials within the septic tank and soils immediately surrounding the inlet end of the tank at CAS 06-59-03 contained benzo(a)pyrene above the FAL of 0.21 mg/kg. The soils, tank contents, and tank were removed. Materials remaining at this CAS do not contain contamination exceeding FALs. The solids contained within the septic tank and inlet pipe at CAS 06-59-05 contained the following contaminants above their respective FALs: PCBs, arsenic, lead, benzo(a)pyrene, and pesticides. The tank and inlet pipe contents were removed. Materials remaining at this CAS do not contain contamination exceeding FALs. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) provides the following corrective action recommendations: No further action for CASs 03-51-01, 06-04-02, and 06-59-04, as no contaminants of potential concern were present that exceed FALs. Closure in place for CAS 06-05-03 under a corrective action with a use restriction (UR) for remaining PCB- and arsenic-impacted potential source material (PSM). The UR form and map have been filed in the NNSA/NSO Facility Information Management System, the FFACO database, and NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Closure in place for CAS 06-05-04 under a corrective action with a UR for remaining PCBs in soil adjacent to and beneath Building CP-162. The UR form and map have been filed in the NNSA/NSO Facility Information Management System, the FFACO database, and NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. No further action for CAS 06-59-0

Grant Evenson

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

Phase II Documentation Overview of Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) initiated the Underground Test Area (UGTA) Subproject to assess and evaluate radiologic groundwater contamination resulting from underground nuclear testing at the NTS. These activities are overseen by the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) (1996, as amended March 2010). For Frenchman Flat, the UGTA Subproject addresses media contaminated by the underground nuclear tests, which is limited to geologic formations within the saturated zone or 100 meters (m) or less above the water table. Transport in groundwater is judged to be the primary mechanism of migration for the subsurface contamination away from the Frenchman Flat underground nuclear tests. The intent of the UGTA Subproject is to assess the risk to the public from the groundwater contamination produced as a result of nuclear testing. The primary method used to assess this risk is the development of models of flow and contaminant transport to forecast the extent of potentially contaminated groundwater for the next 1,000 years, establish restrictions to groundwater usage, and implement a monitoring program to verify protectiveness. For the UGTA Subproject, contaminated groundwater is that which exceeds the radiological standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (CFR, 2009) the State of Nevadas groundwater quality standard to protect human health and the environment. Contaminant forecasts are expected to be uncertain, and groundwater monitoring will be used in combination with land-use control to build confidence in model results and reduce risk to the public. Modeling forecasts of contaminant transport will provide the basis for negotiating a compliance boundary for the Frenchman Flat Corrective Action Unit (CAU). This compliance boundary represents a regulatory-based distinction between groundwater contaminated or not contaminated by underground testing. Transport modeling simulations are used to compute radionuclide concentrations in time and space within the CAU for the 1,000-year contaminant boundary. These three-dimensional (3-D) concentration simulations are integrated into probabilistic forecasts of the likelihood of groundwater exceeding or remaining below the radiological standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (CFR, 2009) defined as the contaminant boundary. Contaminant boundaries are not discrete predictions of the location or concentration of contaminants, but instead are spatial representations of the probability of exceeding Safe Drinking Water Act radiological standards. The forecasts provide planning tools to facilitate regulatory decisions designed to protect the health and safety of the public.

Greg Ruskauff

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

88

Document Control Process  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Document Control Process 11_0304 Page 1 of 7 1 Document Control Process 11_0304 Page 1 of 7 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: Document Control Process Document Number: P-001 Rev 11_0304 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: Q-001, Quality Manual Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): F-001 Document Control Template - Process, F-002 Document Control Template - Instruction, F-003 Document Control Template - Screenshot, F-004 Document Control Template - Form, F-005 Document Control Template - Form - Excel, MGTP-002 Skill Set Model, Q-003 EOTA Processes: Sequence and Interaction, P-003, Control of Records P-001 Document Control Process 11_0304 Page 2 of 7 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change

89

EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Nonconformance Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Nonconformance Report 07_1206.doc 07_1206 Page 1 of 3 5 Nonconformance Report 07_1206.doc 07_1206 Page 1 of 3 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Nonconformance Report Document Number: F-015 Rev. 07_12-06 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: P-011, Nonconforming Material / Product Process Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): N/A F-015 Nonconformance Report 07_1206.doc 07_1206 Page 2 of 3 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 07_1206 Converted form F-015 to a Word Form. Changed layout of form. No content changes were done. C D E F-015 Nonconformance Report 07_1206.doc 07_1206 Page 1 of 1 Nonconformance Report (NCR) General Information NCR # -

90

This document was last updated April 2013 Motivation is defined as the "initiation, direction, intensity, persistence, and quality of behaviour,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This document was last updated April 2013 Motivation Motivation is defined be an important strategy to stay on track. Self monitoring requires constant self evaluation and asking questions or energy". What is is that you need to keep on track? What is your intrinsic motivation? Follow the K

Boonstra, Rudy

91

SHERPA Document SHERPA Document -Institutional Repositories: Staff and Skills Requirements  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SHERPA Document SHERPA Document - Institutional Repositories: Staff and Skills Requirements Mary This document began in response to requests received by the core SHERPA team for examples of job descriptions and UKCORR members. This document will be revised annually (July/August) to reflect changing needs

Southampton, University of

92

Review of technical documents supporting proposed revisions to EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) regulations for the disposal/reuse of sewage sludge under Section 405(D) of the Clean Water Act. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In August 1985 the Environmental Engineering Committee of the Science Advisory Board was asked by the Office of Water Regulations and Standards (OWRS) to review technical documents supporting development of EPA regulations for the disposal/reuse of sewage sludge under Section 405(d) of the Clean Water Act. The Committee was also asked by the Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection (OMEP) to review technical documents supporting revisions of the EPA ocean dumping regulations. The Committee chose to review the two sets of documents together, since they both dealt with a common subject, and since they shared, in some respects, a common methodology. The report, however, covers only the review of the OWRS documents, which consist of a set of risk-assessment methodologies (1,2,3,4) for four sludge disposal/reuse options (landfilling, land application/distribution and marketing, incineration, and ocean disposal). The reviews of the OMEP documents are covered in separate Committee reports. The Committee's principal findings are outlined.

Not Available

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

93

High-level waste storage tank farms/242-A evaporator Standards/Requirements Identification Document (S/RID), Volume 7. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The High-Level Waste Storage Tank Farms/242-A Evaporator Standards/Requirements Identification Document (S/RID) is contained in multiple volumes. This document (Volume 7) presents the standards and requirements for the following sections: Occupational Safety and Health, and Environmental Protection.

Burt, D.L.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

IceCube Collaboration Governance Document IceCube Collaboration Governance Document  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

IceCube Collaboration Governance Document IceCube Collaboration Governance Document Revision 8.1, November 21, 2014 Page 1 of 20 #12;IceCube Collaboration Governance Document IceCube Collaboration Governance Document Revision 8.1, November 21, 2014 Collaboration Objectives The IceCube Collaboration (the

Saffman, Mark

95

Nevada Revised Statutes | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Revised Statutes Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Nevada Revised StatutesLegal Published NA Year Signed or Took...

96

Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This CADD/CAP follows the Corrective Action Investigation (CAI) stage, which results in development of a set of contaminant boundary forecasts produced from groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling of the Frenchman Flat CAU. The Frenchman Flat CAU is located in the southeastern portion of the NNSS and comprises 10 underground nuclear tests. The tests were conducted between 1965 and 1971 and resulted in the release of radionuclides in the subsurface in the vicinity of the test cavities. Two important aspects of the corrective action process are presented within this CADD/CAP. The CADD portion describes the results of the Frenchman Flat CAU data-collection and modeling activities completed during the CAI stage. The corrective action objectives and the actions recommended to meet the objectives are also described. The CAP portion describes the corrective action implementation plan. The CAP begins with the presentation of CAU regulatory boundary objectives and initial use restriction boundaries that are identified and negotiated by NNSA/NSO and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP). The CAP also presents the model evaluation process designed to build confidence that the flow and contaminant transport modeling results can be used for the regulatory decisions required for CAU closure. The first two stages of the strategy have been completed for the Frenchman Flat CAU. A value of information analysis and a CAIP were developed during the CAIP stage. During the CAI stage, a CAIP addendum was developed, and the activities proposed in the CAIP and addendum were completed. These activities included hydrogeologic investigation of the underground testing areas, aquifer testing, isotopic and geochemistry-based investigations, and integrated geophysical investigations. After these investigations, a groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was developed to forecast contaminant boundaries that enclose areas potentially exceeding the Safe Drinking Water Act radiological standards at any time within 1,000 years. An external peer review of the groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was completed, and the model was accepted by NDEP to allow advancement to the CADD/CAP stage. The CADD/CAP stage focuses on model evaluation to ensure that existing models provide adequate guidance for the regulatory decisions regarding monitoring and institutional controls. Data-collection activities are identified and implemented to address key uncertainties in the flow and contaminant transport models. During the CR stage, final use restriction boundaries and CAU regulatory boundaries are negotiated and established; a long-term closure monitoring program is developed and implemented; and the approaches and policies for institutional controls are initiated. The model evaluation process described in this plan consists of an iterative series of five steps designed to build confidence in the site conceptual model and model forecasts. These steps are designed to identify data-collection activities (Step 1), document the data-collection activities in the 0CADD/CAP (Step 2), and perform the activities (Step 3). The new data are then assessed; the model is refined, if necessary; the modeling results are evaluated; and a model evaluation report is prepared (Step 4). The assessments are made by the modeling team and presented to the pre-emptive review committee. The decision is made by the modeling team with the assistance of the pre-emptive review committee and concurrence of NNSA/NSO to continue data and model assessment/refinement, recommend additional data collection, or recommend advancing to the CR stage. A recommendation to advance to the CR stage is based on whether the model is considered to be sufficiently reliable for designing a monitoring system and developing effective institutional controls. The decision to advance to the CR stage or to return to step 1 of the process is then made by NDEP (Step 5).

Irene Farnham and Sam Marutzky

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

97

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 571: Area 9 Yucca Flat Plutonium Dispersion Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide documentation and justification that no further corrective action is needed for the closure of CAU 571 based on the implementation of corrective actions. This includes a description of investigation activities, an evaluation of the data, and a description of corrective actions that were performed. The CAIP provides information relating to the scope and planning of the investigation. Therefore, that information will not be repeated in this document.

Matthews, Patrick

2014-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

98

C:\\Documents and Settings\\fulton\\Local Settings\\Temporary Internet Files\\OLK5F\\Renewing ITFA Revised August 30 2007.doc Revised August 30, 2007  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, extremely broad definition of "Internet access" in ITFA arguably encompasses virtually all goodsC:\\Documents and Settings\\fulton\\Local Settings\\Temporary Internet Files\\OLK5F\\Renewing ITFA Committee, respectively, held hearings on the "Internet Tax Freedom Act" (ITFA). ITFA was enacted in 1998

Shamos, Michael I.

99

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 370: T-4 Atmospheric Test Site, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 370, T-4 Atmospheric Test Site, located in Area 4 at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 370 is comprised of Corrective Action Site (CAS) 04-23-01, Atmospheric Test Site T-4. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 370 due to the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from June 25, 2008, through April 2, 2009, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 370: T-4 Atmospheric Test Site and Record of Technical Change No. 1.

Patrick Matthews

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. This complies with the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management. The purpose of the CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed.

Matthews, Patrick

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 105 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 22, 2012, through May 23, 2013, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices.

Matthews, Patrick

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

102

Cumulative Revision Map  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Unlike static documents, version-controlled documents are edited by one or more authors over a certain period of time. Examples include large scale computer code, papers authored by a team of scientists, and online discussion boards. Such collaborative revision process makes traditional document modeling and visualization techniques inappropriate. In this paper we propose a new visualization technique for version-controlled documents that reveals interesting authoring patterns in papers, computer code and Wikipedia articles. The revealed authoring patterns are useful for the readers, participants in the authoring process, and supervisors.

Kim, Seungyeon; Lebanon, Guy

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Appointments, Promotion & Tenure Document Department of Geography  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appointments, Promotion & Tenure Document Department of Geography Based on Approved 2004 Revision ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Criteria: Tenure Track Faculty....................................................................................... 3 4. Procedures: Tenure Track Faculty

104

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 557: Spills and Tank Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 557, Spills and Tank Sites, in Areas 1, 3, 6, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 557 comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): 01-25-02, Fuel Spill 03-02-02, Area 3 Subdock UST 06-99-10, Tar Spills 25-25-18, Train Maintenance Bldg 3901 Spill Site The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to identify and provide the justification and documentation that supports the recommendation for closure of the CAU 557 CASs with no further corrective action. To achieve this, a corrective action investigation (CAI) was conducted from May 5 through November 24, 2008. The CAI activities were performed as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 557: Spills and Tank Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada.

Alfred Wickline

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

105

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 567: Miscellaneous Soil Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 567: Miscellaneous Soil Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 567 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. The corrective actions implemented at CAU 567 were developed based on an evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, the assumed presence of COCs at specific locations, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the CAAs. The CAAs were selected on technical merit focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, safety, and cost. The implemented corrective actions meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. The CAAs meet all applicable federal and state regulations for closure of the site. Based on the implementation of these corrective actions, the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 567. The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection issue a Notice of Completion to the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office for closure of CAU 567. CAU 567 be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Matthews, Patrick

2014-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 105 comprises the following five corrective action sites (CASs): -02-23-04 Atmospheric Test Site - Whitney Closure In Place -02-23-05 Atmospheric Test Site T-2A Closure In Place -02-23-06 Atmospheric Test Site T-2B Clean Closure -02-23-08 Atmospheric Test Site T-2 Closure In Place -02-23-09 Atmospheric Test Site - Turk Closure In Place The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 105 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 22, 2012, through May 23, 2013, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices.

Matthews, Patrick

2013-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 190: Contaminated Waste Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 190, Contaminated Waste Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy, Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management (1996, as amended January 2007). Corrective Action Unit 190 is comprised of the following four corrective action sites (CASs): 11-02-01, Underground Centrifuge 11-02-02, Drain Lines and Outfall 11-59-01, Tweezer Facility Septic System 14-23-01, LTU-6 Test Area The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 190 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from March 21 through June 26, 2007. All CAI activities were conducted as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 190: Contaminated Waste Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (NNSA/NSO, 2006). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective process: Determine whether contaminants of concern (COCs) are present. If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The CAU 190 dataset from the investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the dataset for use in fulfilling the data quality objective data needs.

Alfred Wickline

2008-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 234: Mud Pits, Cellars, and Mud Spills Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 234, Mud Pits, Cellars, and Mud Spills, located in Areas 2, 3, 4, 12, and 15 at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO,1996; as amended February 2008). Corrective Action Unit 234 is comprised of the following 12 corrective action sites: 02-09-48, Area 2 Mud Plant #1 02-09-49, Area 2 Mud Plant #2 02-99-05, Mud Spill 03-09-02, Mud Dump Trenches 04-44-02, Mud Spill 04-99-02, Mud Spill 12-09-01, Mud Pit 12-09-04, Mud Pit 12-09-08, Mud Pit 12-30-14, Cellar 12-99-07, Mud Dump 15-09-01, Mud Pit The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 234 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 234: Mud Pits, Cellars, and Mud Spills (NNSA/NSO, 2007). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: Determine whether contaminants of concern are present. If contaminants of concern are present, determine their extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The CAU 234 dataset from the investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the dataset for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs.

Grant Evenson

2008-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 371: Johnnie Boy Crater and Pin Stripe Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit 371, Johnnie Boy Crater and Pin Stripe, located within Areas 11 and 18 at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 371 comprises two corrective action sites (CASs): 11-23-05, Pin Stripe Contamination Area 18-45-01, U-18j-2 Crater (Johnnie Boy) The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 371 based on the implementation of corrective actions. The corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls was implemented at both CASs. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from January 8, 2009, through February 16, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 371: Johnnie Boy Crater and Pin Stripe. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 371 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. Radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were not found to be present in the surface soil. However, it was assumed that radionuclides are present in subsurface media within the Johnnie Boy crater and the fissure at Pin Stripe. Due to the assumption of radiological dose exceeding the FAL, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each site. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 371. A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 371. Corrective Action Unit 371 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit 365 comprises one corrective action site (CAS), CAS 08-23-02, U-8d Contamination Area. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 365 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with a use restriction (UR). Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from January 18, 2011, through August 2, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 365 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in supporting the DQO decisions. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present to the southwest of the Baneberry crater. It was also assumed that radionuclide levels present within the crater and fissure exceed the FAL. Corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of establishing a UR and posting warning signs for the crater, fissure, and the area located to the southwest of the crater where soil concentrations exceeded the FAL. These URs were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions beyond what are described in this document are necessary for CAU 365. (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 365. (3) Corrective Action Unit 365 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 410: Waste Disposal Trenches, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada: Revision No. 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report (CADD/CR) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 410: Waste Disposal Trenches, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 410 consists of five Corrective Action Sites (CASs): TA-21-003-TANL; 09-21-001-TA09; TA-19-002-TAB2; TA-21-002-TAAL; and 03-19-001. The CADD and CR have been combined into one report because no further action is recommended for this CAU. The corrective action alternative recommended for CAU 410 is Clean Closure; therefore, no corrective action or corrective action plan is required. No use restrictions are required to be placed on this CAU because the investigation showed no evidence of remaining soil contamination or remaining debris/waste upon completion of all investigation activities.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

112

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit 367 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): 10-09-03, Mud Pit 10-45-01, U-10h Crater (Sedan) 10-45-02, Ess Crater Site 10-45-03, Uncle Crater Site The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation of the corrective actions and site closure activities implemented at CAU 367. A corrective action of closure in place with use restrictions was completed at each of the three crater CASs (10-45-01, 10-45-02, and 10-45-03); corrective actions were not required at CAS 10-09-03. In addition, a limited soil removal corrective action was conducted at the location of a potential source material release. Based on completion of these correction actions, no additional corrective action is required at CAU 367, and site closure is considered complete. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from February 2010 through March 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of non-test or other releases (e.g., migration in washes and potential source material). Based on the proximity of the Uncle, Ess, and Sedan craters, the impact of the Sedan test on the fallout deposited from the two earlier tests, and aerial radiological surveys, the CAU 367 investigation was designed to study the releases from the three crater CASs as one combined release (primary release). Corrective Action Site 10-09-03, Mud Pit, consists of two mud pits identified at CAU 367. The mud pits are considered non-test releases or other releases and were investigated independent of the three crater CASs. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 367 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. For the primary release, radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were not found to be present in the surface or shallow subsurface soil outside the default contamination boundary. However, it was assumed that radionuclides are present in subsurface media within each of the three craters (Sedan, Ess, and Uncle) due to prompt injection of radionuclides from the tests. Based on the assumption of radiological dose exceeding the FAL, corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each crater CAS. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. With regard to other releases, no contaminants of concern were identified at the mud pits or any of the other release locations, with one exception. Potential source material in the form of lead was found at one location. A corrective action of clean closure was implemented at this location, and verification samples indicated that no further action is necessary. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 367. Corrective Action Unit 367 should be promoted from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD)/Closure Report (CR) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 372, Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, located within Areas 18 and 20 at the Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 372 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): 18-45-02, Little Feller I Surface Crater 18-45-03, Little Feller II Surface Crater 20-23-01, U-20k Contamination Area 20-45-01, U-20L Crater (Cabriolet) The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 372 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls at all CASs. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from November 9, 2009, through December 10, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 372 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL was established of 25 millirem per year based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present at all four CASs. It is assumed that radionuclide levels present within the Little Feller I and Cabriolet high contamination areas and within the craters at Palanquin and Cabriolet exceed the FAL. It is also assumed that potential source material in the form of lead bricks at Little Feller I and lead-acid batteries at Palanquin and Cabriolet exceed the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of removing potential source material, where present, and implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each CAS. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 372. A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 372. Corrective Action Unit 372 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Matthews, Patrick and Sloop, Christy

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 106: Area 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit 106 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): (1) 05-20-02, Evaporation Pond; (2) 05-23-05, Atmospheric Test Site - Able; (3) 05-45-04, 306 GZ Rad Contaminated Area; (4) 05-45-05, 307 GZ Rad Contaminated Area. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 106 based on the implementation of corrective actions. The corrective action of clean closure was implemented at CASs 05-45-04 and 05-45-05, while no corrective action was necessary at CASs 05-20-02 and 05-23-05. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 20, 2010, through June 1, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 106: Areas 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of other releases (mechanical displacement and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 106 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Industrial Area exposure scenario (2,250 hours of annual exposure). The only radiological dose exceeding the FAL was at CAS 05-45-05 and was associated with potential source material (PSM). It is also assumed that additional PSM in the form of depleted uranium (DU) and DU-contaminated debris at CASs 05-45-04 and 05-45-05 exceed the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken at these CASs that consisted of removing PSM and collecting verification samples. Results of verification samples show that remaining soil does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 106. (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 106. (3) Corrective Action Unit 106 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews and Dawn Peterson

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 140: Waste Dumps, Burn Pits, and Storage Area, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision No. 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies and rationalizes the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's selection of a recommended corrective action alternative appropriate to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 140: Waste Dumps, Burn Pits, and Storage Area, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in Areas 5, 22, and 23 of the NTS, CAU 140 consists of nine corrective action sites (CASs). Investigation activities were performed from November 13 through December 11, 2002, with additional sampling to delineate the extent of contaminants of concern (COCs) conducted on February 4 and March 18 and 19, 2003. Results obtained from the investigation activities and sampling indicated that only 3 of the 9 CASs at CAU 140 had COCs identified. Following a review of existing data, future land use, and current operations at the NTS, the following preferred alternatives were developed for consideration: (1) No Further Action - six CASs (05-08-02, 05-17-01, 05-19-01, 05-35-01, 05-99-04, and 22-99-04); (2) Clean Closure - one CAS (05-08-01), and (3) Closure-in-Place - two CASs (05-23-01 and 23-17-01). These alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. Additionally, the alternatives meet all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the site and will eliminate potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated media at CAU 140.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-10-17T23:59:59.000Z

116

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 127: Areas 25 and 26 Storage Tanks, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies and rationalizes the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's selection of recommended corrective action alternatives (CAAs) appropriate to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 127: Areas 25 and 26 Storage Tanks, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 127 consists of twelve corrective action sites (CASs). Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from February 24, 2003, through May 2, 2003, with additional sampling conducted on June 6, 2003, June 9, 2003, and June 24, 2003. Analytes detected during these investigation activities were evaluated against preliminary action levels to identify contaminants of concern (COCs) for each CAS, resulting in the determination that only two of the CASs did not have COCs exceeding regulatory levels. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, review of future and current operations in Areas 25 and 26 of the Nevada Test Site, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, the following alternatives were developed for consideration: (1) No Further Action is the preferred corrective action for the two CASs (25-02-13, 26-02-01) identified with no COCs; (2) Clean Closure is the preferred corrective action for eight of the CASs (25-01-05, 25-23-11, 25-12-01, 25-01-06, 26-01-01, 26-01-02, 26-99-01, 26-23-01); and (3) Closure in Place is the preferred corrective action for the remaining two CASs (25-01-07, 25-02-02). These three alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. Additionally, these alternatives meet all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the sites at CAU 127 and will reduce potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated media.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-09-26T23:59:59.000Z

117

Corrective Action Decision Document/ Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 556: Dry Wells and Surface Release Points, Nevada Test Site, Nevada with Errata Sheet, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD)/Closure Report (CR) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit 556, Dry Wells and Surface Release Points, located at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO, 1996; as amended February 2008). Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 556 is comprised of four corrective action sites (CASs): 06-20-04, National Cementers Dry Well 06-99-09, Birdwell Test Hole 25-60-03, E-MAD Stormwater Discharge and Piping 25-64-01, Vehicle Washdown and Drainage Pit The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 556 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities began on February 7 and were completed on June 19, 2008, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 556: Dry Wells and Surface Release Points, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (NNSA/NSO, 2007). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: Determine whether contaminants of concern (COCs) are present. If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The CAU 556 data were evaluated based on the data quality assessment process, which demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the data for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against appropriate final action levels (FALs) to identify the COCs for each CAS. The results of the CAI identified COCs at one of the four CASs in CAU 556 that required the completion of a corrective action. Assessment of the data generated from investigation activities conducted at CAU 556 revealed the following: Corrective Action Sites 06-20-04, 06-99-09, and 25-64-01 do not contain contamination at concentrations exceeding the FALs. Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination above the FAL was identified in the surface and/or shallow subsurface soils at the outfall and around Catch Basin 2, and in soils contained within the catch basins and the manhole at CAS 25-60-03. A corrective action of close in place with a soil removal action and use restriction (UR) was completed at CAS 25-60-03. The PCB-contaminated soils were removed from the outfall area and around Catch Basin 2, and disposed of at a Nevada Test Site landfill as part of a removal action. The catch basins and the manhole were sealed shut by filling them with grout. The end of the outfall pipe was plugged using grout, covered with soil, and the area was regraded. A UR was applied to the entire stormwater system at CAS 25-60-03, which includes the three catch basins, manhole, and associated piping. No further action is the corrective action for CASs 06-20-04, 06-99-09, and 25-64-01. The liquids in the test holes at CAS 06-99-09 were removed for disposal and the features were filled with grout as a best management practice. The drainage pipe between the vehicle washdown pad and the drainage pit at CAS 25-64-01 was sealed at each end as a best management practice. The corrective actions were evaluated on technical merit focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, safety, and cost. They were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. The corrective actions meet all applicable federal and state regulations for closure of the site and will reduce potential exposure pathways to the contaminated media to an acceptable level at CAU 556. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office provides the following recommendations: Maintain a UR for the entire stormwater drainage system (i.e., three catch basins, one manhole, and associated piping) at CAS 25-60-03. No further corrective action for CAU 556. A Notice of Completion to the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada

Grant Evenson

2008-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Microsoft Word - NDA Box PDP Plan-Revision 4-final  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Characterization Program Revision 4 May 2013 This document supersedes Revision 3 of DOECBFO-01-1006 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Office of the National TRU...

119

Technical approach document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978, Public Law 95-604 (PL95-604), grants the Secretary of Energy the authority and responsibility to perform such actions as are necessary to minimize radiation health hazards and other environmental hazards caused by inactive uranium mill sites. This Technical Approach Document (TAD) describes the general technical approaches and design criteria adopted by the US Department of Energy (DOE) in order to implement remedial action plans (RAPS) and final designs that comply with EPA standards. It does not address the technical approaches necessary for aquifer restoration at processing sites; a guidance document, currently in preparation, will describe aquifer restoration concerns and technical protocols. This document is a second revision to the original document issued in May 1986; the revision has been made in response to changes to the groundwater standards of 40 CFR 192, Subparts A--C, proposed by EPA as draft standards. New sections were added to define the design approaches and designs necessary to comply with the groundwater standards. These new sections are in addition to changes made throughout the document to reflect current procedures, especially in cover design, water resources protection, and alternate site selection; only minor revisions were made to some of the sections. Sections 3.0 is a new section defining the approach taken in the design of disposal cells; Section 4.0 has been revised to include design of vegetated covers; Section 8.0 discusses design approaches necessary for compliance with the groundwater standards; and Section 9.0 is a new section dealing with nonradiological hazardous constituents. 203 refs., 18 figs., 26 tabs.

Not Available

1989-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 475.2A, Identifying Classified Information  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The revision will incorporate changes that were identified during the 1-year review after initial issuance

2014-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Document Information Document # FOIA-2009-0054 Revision Title...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of discussions to expand the LLBG. Mr. Evans went on to explain that the LLBG could be expanded to include an additional four square mile area as a new waste management area....

122

Uranium hexafluoride: A manual of good practice ORO 651 revision 6  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The United States Department of Energy publishes a document containing UF{sub 6} handling procedures and descriptions of the approved UF{sub 6} cylinders. Since its initial publication in 1966, it has been frequently revised to provide more and better information. The principle additions to the sixth revision which will be discussed are: (1) more detail on the physical and chemical properties of UF{sub 6}; (2) cold trap description and operation; (3) cylinder emptying and filling concepts; (4) basis for cylinder fill limits; (5) short- and long-term cylinder storage; and (6) cylinder photographs and drawings showing major dimensions.

Dyer, R.H. [Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)

1991-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

123

Document Reviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Document Reviews, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security information and document declassification efforts promote the release of information needed by an informed citizenry...

124

ACCELERATOR TEST FACILITY SAFETY ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT TABLE OF...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Revised: March 1, 2010 i ACCELERATOR TEST FACILITY SAFETY ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITY ......

125

High Level Waste System Plan Revision 9  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Revision 9 of the High Level Waste System Plan documents the current operating strategy of the HLW System at SRS to receive, store, treat, and dispose of high-level waste.

Davis, N.R.; Wells, M.N.; Choi, A.S.; Paul, P.; Wise, F.E.

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

EM Quality Assurance Policy, Revision 0  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Previous EM policy on the use of the corporate Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Rev. 0). This document has been superseded by Revision 1 of the policy, but is still in use at some EM sites.

127

REVISION POLICY  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

REVISION POLICY REVISION POLICY March 2007 Data are collected at the million cubic feet per month level and all calculations mentioned below are carried out at that precision. However, the data published in the Form EIA-914 Monthly Gas Production Report are rounded to the nearest 0.01 billion cubic feet per day (roughly 300 million cubic feet per month). Monthly estimates of gross production published in the Natural Gas Monthly at the national level are rounded to billion cubic feet and those for marketed production at the State level are rounded to million cubic feet. The prior month's production estimate will always be revised each month, when the production estimate for the latest data month is released. For example, a June estimate would be revised when a July estimate is released.

128

Revision notice  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

All Natural Gas Reports U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves With Data for 2013 | Release Date: December 4, 2014 | Revision: December 19, 2014 Next Release Date: December...

129

Document Preparation | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Document Preparation Document Preparation Document Preparation Selected documents on the topic of NEPA Document Preparation. October 29, 2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA DOE Offices are encouraged to be inclusive in providing potentially interested parties with opportunities to review NEPA documents. This Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA is primarily intended to supplement lists that Departmental Offices compile for individual projects or facilities. It complements the EIS Distribution Guidance. The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance updates this Directory annually in July and may issue revisions throughout the year as new information becomes available. September 7, 2012 OMB and CEQ Joint Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict

130

Required Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Required Documents Required Documents Required Documents All foreign nationals, including students and postdocs, must select the foreign nationals employment category to complete the new-hire process. Contact (505) 665-7158 Email Complete following forms before New-Hire Orientation Be sure to bring the forms with you for the orientation event, but do not sign and date: Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification (pdf) - original, unexpired documents for verification of employment eligibility. Please refer to the I-9 verification form titled, "Lists of Acceptable Documents", which was included with your offer letter. (Laminated documents or hospital/temporary birth certificates are not accepted.) Note: Failure to provide required documents will result in delay and/or

131

Using Text Animated Transitions to Support Navigation in Document Histories  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, keeping track of changes to a portion of a document, or quickly seeing what happened to a document sinceUsing Text Animated Transitions to Support Navigation in Document Histories Fanny Chevalier documents. We propose an animation technique for smoothly transitioning between different text revisions

Toronto, University of

132

Global Threat Reduction Initiative | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Reduction Initiative An overview of the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, U.S.-Origin Nuclear Fuel Removals. Global Threat Reduction Initiative More Documents &...

133

Global Threat Reduction Initiative | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Initiative Global Threat Reduction Initiative The Current Status of Gap and U.S.-Origin Nuclear Fuel Removals 2011. Global Threat Reduction Initiative More Documents &...

134

ADR Revised Policy | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Policy Revised Policy ADR Revised Policy SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and othercollaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts. ADR Revised Policy More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc

135

Assessment Documents  

Energy Savers [EERE]

independent-oversight-review-lawrence-livermore-national-laboratory-september-2013" typeof"sioc:Item foaf:Document">

October 2,...

136

Enforcement Documents  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Documents en Consent Order, Battelle Memorial Institute - October 24, 2014 http:energy.goveadownloadsconsent-order-battelle-memorial-institute-october-24-2014

137

INCOMING DOCUMENT CONTROL FORM DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION ORGANIZATIO  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

INCOMING DOCUMENT CONTROL FORM DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION ORGANIZATIO )ATE COMPLETED: ACTION NUMBER: I ! I I DOCUMENT CONTROL DATE INITIALS DATA BASE: ACTION LOG: FILED: To : Doug Tonkay, OTS Decen From: MIchele Landis, dRW Subject: Draft report ~ Result= of the Radiologic; Former Ore Storage Site, Palmerton, Pennsylvania Attached is one copy of the draft report. PIE provide your comments to me by January 16, 1990. tlichele Landis ,9, 1989 "ey at the review and Results of the Radiological SJrvey at the Former Ore S&age Site, Palmerton, PennsylvLnia (PPOOI) J. L Quikd J. W. Cdchdr W. D. &rei ! I : HEALTH AND t5UEI-Y RESEARCH DMSi Waste Management Research and Development Prc (Activity No. AH 10 05 00 0; NEAHOOl) RESULTS OF 'I-HE RADIOLOGICAL SURV

138

Revision History  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revision History Revision History Rev. 0, August 2012 Original submittal for milestone M3FT-12SN0804032 (Sandia programmatic and classification review) Rev. 1, September 2012 Corrected transposition errors in costing tables; recalculated stainless steel overpacks to be carbon steel; corrected various editorial problems. (SAND2012-7979P) Rev. 2, November 2012 Performed peer review and retitled. Submittal for milestone M2FT-13SN0804031 (formerly milestone M2FT- 12SN0804031) (SAND2012-9737P) Unclassified Unlimited Release Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

139

ELM Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ELM Home Documents ELM Plan ELM Tracts Tract Map ELM at Work ELM Home Documents ELM Plan ELM Tracts Tract Map ELM at Work ELM Documents Committee Charter: The formal charge from the Fermilab director to the ELM committee. Committee Membership: A list of the current members of the ELM committee. Tract Management ELM Plan: The site ecological management plan for the current year. Tract List: A list of links to tract summaries from the latest approved ELM plan. Tract Map: An interactive map showing the locations of the various ELM tracts. Fire Management Non-structural Fire Management Plan: (Microsoft Word Document) Burn Histories: View the burn histories for the relevant ELM tracts. Map of Proposed Burns for the current or upcoming fire management season. This map is interactive and can also display the locations of past burn sites.

140

Last Revision Date: 8/16/2010 Last Merged Filing ID:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Revision Date: 8/16/2010 Last Merged Filing ID: Revision Date: 8/16/2010 Last Merged Filing ID: Tariffs, Rate Schedules, and Other Tariff Documents Southwestern Power Administration Tariffs, Rate Schedules, and Other Tariff Documents Document Generated On: 10/1/2010 Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................1 PREAMBLE: AUTHORITIES AND OBLIGATIONS .............................................................................................1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 569 comprises the following nine corrective action sites (CASs): 03-23-09, T-3 Contamination Area 03-23-10, T-3A Contamination Area 03-23-11, T-3B Contamination Area 03-23-12, T-3S Contamination Area 03-23-13, T-3T Contamination Area 03-23-14, T-3V Contamination Area 03-23-15, S-3G Contamination Area 03-23-16, S-3H Contamination Area 03-23-21, Pike Contamination Area The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 569 based on the implementation of the corrective actions listed in Table ES-2.

Sloop, Christy

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

PETSc: Documentation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Documentation Documentation Home Download Features Documentation Manual pages and Users Manual Citing PETSc Tutorials Installation AMS Changes Bug Reporting Code Management FAQ License Linear Solver Table Applications/Publications Miscellaneous External Software Developers Site PETSc is a sophisticated package and fully understanding its usage requires time. However, application programmers can easily begin to use PETSc from a high level and then gradually learn more details according to their needs. Users should read the users manual before attempting to do any serious coding with PETSc! PETSc users manual - pdf (fully searchable with hyperlinks) Index of all help topics Index of all manual pages Strategies for using PETSc with Fortran PETSc Manual Pages and Examples MPI TAO Vector Operations (Vec)

143

Oversight Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

oversight-documents Forrestal Building 1000 oversight-documents Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205851.800.dial.DOE en Independent Oversight Activity Report, Idaho Cleanup Project - November 2013 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/independent-oversight-activity-report-idaho-cleanup-project-november-2013 Independent Oversight Activity Report, Idaho Cleanup Project - November 2013

144

Enforcement Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

enforcement-documents Forrestal Building 1000 enforcement-documents Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205851.800.dial.DOE en Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-04 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/enforcement-letter-wel-2013-04 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-04

145

Revised (05/06)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 (Revised 03/12) Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Expires: General Information 1. Purpose Standard Remittance Advice (RA) form is a mandatory form designed to serve as the source document for entries into the Department's accounting records under Public Law 97-425 data from Purchasers concerning payment of their contribution to the Nuclear Waste Fund. 2. Who Shall Submit The RA must be submitted by Purchasers who signed the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste. Submit Copy 1, 2, and 3 to DOE, Energy Finance and Accounting Service Center and retain Copy 4.

146

Microsoft Word - LBNL-57260-Revision.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7260-Revision 7260-Revision ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the Pharmaceutical Industry An ENERGY STAR ® Guide for Energy and Plant Managers Christina Galitsky, Sheng-chieh Chang, Ernst Worrell, and Eric Masanet Environmental Energy Technologies Division Sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency March 2008 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes

147

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 7  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This seventh revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes up-to-date information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, environmental monitoring, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. More detailed data are available from reference sources cited or from the authors. Chapter 5.0 was not updated from the sixth revision (1994). It describes models, including their principal underlying assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. The updated Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE Orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site, following the structure of Chapter 4.0. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be used directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the Hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

Cushing, C.E. [ed.] ed.; Baker, D.A.; Chamness, M.A. [and others] and others

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 6  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This sixth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes up-to-date information on climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. More detailed data are available from reference sources cited or from the authors; Chapter 5.0 has been significantly updated from the fifth revision. It describes models, including their principal underlying assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions; The updated Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site, following the structure of Chapter 4.0. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be utilized directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the Hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

Cushing, C.E. [ed.; Baker, D.A.; Chamness, M.A. [and others

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

DOE/LX/07-0175&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-10 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-10 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 221 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

150

DOE/LX/07-0170&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-02 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-02 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 213 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

151

DOE/LX/07-0172&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-05 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-05 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 216 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

152

DOE/LX/07-0177&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-12 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-12 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 223 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

153

DOE/LX/07-0300&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-09 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-09 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 220 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 70202, 030105,...

154

DOE/LX/07-0063&D1 Secondary Document DMSA-333-11 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA-333-11 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 266 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 031509 REGULATORY...

155

DOE/LX/07-0178&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-13 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-13 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 224 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

156

DOE/LX/07-0302&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-15 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-15 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 226 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 011511 REGULATORY...

157

DOE/LX/07-0079&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-07 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-07 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 218 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 032404; 030105;...

158

DOE/LX/07-0061&D1 Secondary Document DMSA-333-19 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA-333-19 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 275 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 112502; 031509...

159

DOE/LX/07-0062&D1 Secondary Document DMSA-331-24 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA-331-24 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 255 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 031509 REGULATORY...

160

DOE/LX/07-0299&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-06 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-06 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 217 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 100703, 011511...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

DOE/LX/07-0095 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-44 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-44 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 347 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 33106; 031509...

162

DOE/LX/07-0176&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-11 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-11 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 222 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 070202, 030105,...

163

DOE/LX/07-0301&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-14 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-14 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 225 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 011511...

164

DOE/LX/07-0298&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-04 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-04 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 215 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 011511 REGULATORY...

165

DOE/LX/07-0183&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-18 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-18 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 229 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 52803, 031509...

166

DOE/LX/07-0181&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-16 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-16 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 227 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 022704, 030205,...

167

DOE/LX/07-0182&D1 Secondary Document DMSA OS-17 Solid Waste Management...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Secondary Document DMSA OS-17 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 228 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

168

DOE/LX/07-0295 Secondary Document Rubble Area KY-19 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document Rubble Area KY-19 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 565 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 091309 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: NA REGULATORY STATUS:...

169

ARM - Conference Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

govPublicationsConference Documents Publications Journal Articles Conference Documents Program Documents Technical Reports Publications Database Public Information Materials Image...

170

Untitled Document  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

689-Rev. 1 689-Rev. 1 Nevada Environmental Restoration Project Site Characterization Work Plan for the Gnome-Coach Site, New Mexico Controlled Copy No.: Revision No.: 1 January 2002 Approved for public release; further dissemination is unlimited. U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office Environmental Restoration Division Available for public sale, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 800.553.6847 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: orders@ntis.fedworld.gov Online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm Available electronically at http://www.doe.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors,

171

Untitled Document  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Study - Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Study - Main Menu DOE/CAO 95-1095 REMOTE-HANDLED TRANSURANIC WASTE STUDY U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Area Office Carlsbad, New Mexico October 1995 This document has been reproduced directly from the best possible copy. It is available to DOE and DOE contractors at the following address: Office of Scientific and Technical Information P. O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 For prices contact (615) 576-8401 The local WIPP contact for this document is George Basabilvazo (pronounced Baasa-bill-vaaso) (505) 234-7488 or E-Mail George.Basabilvazo@wipp.ws TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (See below) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (See below) 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Objectives 1.2 Background 2.0 THE TRANSURANIC WASTE DISPOSAL STRATEGY 2.1 Room Configuration

172

CHRG Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Documents Documents Benefit Value Manual Davis-Bacon Act Desk Guide Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 DEAR 970.5204-81 Diversity Plan - Acquisition Letter Directory of Classifications DOE Acquisition Regulations (Chapter 970) DOE F 350.1 - Contractor Salary-Wage Increase Expenditure Report DOE O 311.1A Equal Opportunity and Diversity Program DOE O 350.1 "Contractor Human Resources Programs" DOE O 442.1 Employee Concerns Program Equal Employment Opportunity Preaward Clearance Request Form Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs Procurement Policy Flashes Service Contract Act of 1965 Wage Determination Request Form Wage Determinations On-line Workplace Substance Abuse Programs at DOE Sites Reports Annual Payroll & Residence Report for Oak Ridge Area

173

NEPA Documentation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Note for: Cynthia Quarterman Note for: Cynthia Quarterman Keith Harper From: Carol Borgstrom Subject: NEPA Documentation Date: December 3, 2008 Attached, per your request, are two lists: (1) DOE environmental assessments (EAs) issued since 12/1/2006 and (2) DOE environmental impact statements (EISs) issued since 12/1/2006. Also, per your request, is a copy of a general NEPA briefing provided to the Acting Deputy Secretary in May 2008. Please let me know if you have any further questions (carol.borgstrom @hq.doe.gov; 202-586-4600). cc: Ingrid Kolb, MA-1 (without attachments) Janet Barsy, GC-1 EA Database Listing Document Start FONSI Months Total NEPA Cost Program Number Title Date Date Complete Ops Office Office DOE/EA-1389 Charlie Creek-Williston Transmission 3/20/2001 2/20/2008 83.2 $345,236.21 WAPA

174

Maryland Hybrid Truck Goods Movement Initiative | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

-- Washington D.C. tiarravt063rice2010p.pdf More Documents & Publications Maryland Hybrid Truck Goods Movement Initiative Maryland Hybrid Truck Goods Movement Initiative...

175

EERE Program Management Initiative (PMI) Brochure  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

The EERE Program Management Initiative document outlines a coordinated set of actions to improve its program management capabilities.

176

DOE/LX/07-0092&D1 Secondary Document  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document 1 DMSA C-337-25 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 330 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 010505; 33106; 03...

177

Task Force on Undergraduate Retention and Graduation: Meeting Documentation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Task Force on Undergraduate Retention and Graduation: Meeting Documentation March 17, 2011 Part 1 Altenkirch Charge to the Committee, February 3, 2011 Meeting Date: March 17, 2011; minutes revised on April

Bieber, Michael

178

BSCMeasuresInformationRevisionSept2005.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Procurement System Balanced Scorecard Performance Measures Information Document Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Revised: September 2005 2 Table of Contents Purpose ...................................................................................................... 4 CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE Customer Satisfaction: Timeliness ........................................................................................... 5 Quality ................................................................................................ 7 Effective Service/Partnership ........................................................................... 9 INTERNAL BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE Acquisition Excellence .................................................................................. 11

179

Revised Nov. 2013 Contracting and Procurement Services  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised Nov. 2013 Contracting and Procurement Services Contract and Purchase Order Cover Sheet Procedures The Contract and Purchase Order Cover Sheet is an internal document utilized by Contracting the business purpose of the proposed purchase or contract; 2) Identify courses offered for credit at off campus

Caughman, John

180

Ehron Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ehron Documents Ehron Documents 1993 S-F-1325.12 CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL FORM (11-90) OFFICE OF THE EXECLTIVE SECRETARIAT ACTIVITY ADD DO NOT DETACH FROM ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE 01/19/93 10:17 SOURCE CODE pM PUBLIC MAIL SPEC INT: _ CONTROL N( S93-000578 DATE CORR: 01/13/93 DATERECD: 01/19/93 DATECNTRL: 01/19/93 -DATE DUE: LETTER: MEMO: TWX: _OTHER: MOTION TO:SECY: X DEPSEC: UN SEC: OTHER: ROM:FLOWERS,G PATRICK TX O REMARKS: ENRON CORP. UB J : LEGAL -=--_- LITIGATION FOR USE fY ACT N OFFICE ONLY MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE ACTION REFERRED TO DATE RETURN TO DUE OF NORTHERN NATURAL GAS CO., DATE TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE CO., 2 FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION CO... _3-_ ACTION TO: rr - TYPE ACTION: Appropriate action SIG OF: 3NCURRENCE: i NFORMATION:DS US EP FE ES1 D02 FILE CODE:PMFLOWFRS-ES930'00578 CONTROL ANALYST: B ATCHERSON 6-2255

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 MERRTT Revision Letter 8 MERRTT Revision Letter 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students' understanding of the decontamination dress-down process at an accident scene. Additional enhancements included the streamlining of objectives from the Terminology & Units and Assessing Package Integrity modules into other existing modules. 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter More Documents & Publications 2009 TEPP Annual Report

182

COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS MODEL FOR DWPF CANISTER FILLING, REVISION 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This revision is an extension of the COMSOL Multiphysics model previously developed and documented to simulate the temperatures of the glass during pouring a Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) canister. In that report the COMSOL Multiphysics model used a lumped heat loss term derived from experimental thermocouple data based on a nominal pour rate of 228 lbs./hr. As such, the model developed using the lumped heat loss term had limited application without additional experimental data. Therefore, the COMSOL Multiphysics model was modified to simulate glass pouring and subsequent heat input which, replaced the heat loss term in the initial model. This new model allowed for changes in flow geometry based on pour rate as well as the ability to increase and decrease flow and stop and restart flow to simulate varying process conditions. A revised COMSOL Multiphysics model was developed to predict temperatures of the glass within DWPF canisters during filling and cooldown. The model simulations and experimental data were in good agreement. The largest temperature deviations were {approx} 40 C for the 87 inch thermocouple location at 3000 minutes and during the initial cool down at the 51 inch location occurring at approximately 600 minutes. Additionally, the model described in this report predicts the general temperature trends during filling and cooling as observed experimentally. The revised model incorporates a heat flow region corresponding to the glass pouring down the centerline of the canister. The geometry of this region is dependent on the flow rate of the glass and can therefore be used to see temperature variations for various pour rates. The equations used for this model were developed by comparing simulation output to experimental data from a single pour rate. Use of the model will predict temperature profiles for other pour rates but the accuracy of the simulations is unknown due to only a single flow rate comparison.

Kesterson, M.

2011-09-08T23:59:59.000Z

183

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-05/0-1713-1 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 5. Report Date October 1997 / Revised May 1998 4. Title and Subtitle EVALUATION Zhang, and W. Ronald Hudson 8. Performing Organization Report No. 0-1713-1 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)9

Texas at Austin, University of

184

Incremental Hierarchical Clustering of Text Documents  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in incremental clustering of text documents as a part of Topic Detection and Tracking initiative ([1], [19], [10Incremental Hierarchical Clustering of Text Documents by Nachiketa Sahoo Adviser: Jamie Callan May 5, 2006 Abstract Incremental hierarchical text document clustering algorithms are important

Gordon, Geoffrey J.

185

Basic Research for the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Basic Research for the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative Basic Research for the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative Basic Research for the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative More Documents & Publications FTA -...

186

SRS - ARRA General Provisions and Related Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) General Provisions and Related Documents General Provisions/Terms and Conditions Documents Certifications Solicitation/Subcontract Documents Focused Observation Safety Checklists Construction Subcontract Documents/Forms General Provisions/Terms and Conditions Documents DOCUMENT NUMBER TITLE REVISION # or DATE SRNS-MS-2009-00069 Fixed Price Orders 5 SRNS-MS-2009-00072 Construction Subcontract Exhibit A 7 SRNS-MS-2009-00073 Time and Material / Labor Hour 5 SRNS-MS-2009-00074 Commercial Terms and Conditions for Dismantling, Demolition, or Removal of Improvements 5 SRNS-MS-2009-00075 Corporate Professional Services 6 SRNS-MS-2009-00076 Individual Consultants 5 SRNS-MS-2010-00085 Cost Reimbursement Orders with Educational Institutions 4

187

AFFECTED DOCUMENT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

rr-osams rr-osams ADMIN RCD _ RESPONSE TRACKING INFORMATION I 'OWED BY: (ORG) I TARGET DATE { I CLOSING CCN COMPL. DATE { CLOSING REF I I lOWED BY: (ORG) { { I { { TARGET DATE I CLOSING CCN COMPL DATE CLOSING REF TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION (TSD) BACKFIT (Documents dated prior to 1 November 1988) FUSRAP COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION DOEIORO TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION (CE·53) BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC. -JOB 14501 _-....Iome....:.-R..%.JI&~S::....:::S.::...- TO_---.,!5~Z~IJ~u..~ COMM DATE &6 tlJ t.e ADDR CODE I I I I CLOSES CCN WBS _....:,;},=(J ........ 2._--- _ NUMBER ST SUBJECT CODE 70()O DOE FILE NO. _ SUBJECT NFs S RESIDIJAl.J OIJR;T 1tJ/UL t2U /DffG-./NE.5 ~..:ll..Jll~~l...3Io.,;~..:ll..Jll~~Io....JIo,.;~~~~Io....JIo,.;~~~~Io....JIo,.;:Io....1.~~~"""";:Io....1.~CCN _

188

Enron Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Enron Documents 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 13S. 12 CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL FORM 1) OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT 8CTIVITY ADD DO NOT DETACH FROM ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE 0/03/Y4 10: O0 5OURCECODE PM PUBLIC MAIL :?EC INT: CONTROL NO: ES94-012853 ,ATE CORR: 04/25/94 DATE RECD: 05/02/94 DATE CNTRL: 05/03/94 DATE DUE: NONE :TTER: X MEMO: TWX: _ OTHER: TO: SECY: X DEP SEC: _ UN SEC: OTHER: )M:LAY,KENNETH L \ TX O REMARKS: RELATES TO ES94-009882. i ENRON CORP. J: PUBLIC INFORMATION NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL ---- FOR USE BY ACTION OFFICE ONLY- ACCEPTS INV ITATION TO CONTINUE DUE ACTION REFERRED TO DATE RETURN TO TO SERVE AS A MEMBER OF THE DATE NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL I ___ 21 3 I .CTION TO: FE TYPE ACTION: Appropriate action SIG OF: _ CURRENCE: ORMATION: ES D04

189

Enron Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 ,. OFC OU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET IMPORTANT ES NUMBER:- ES96-000274 EXTERNAL kTE OF DOC: 12/28/95 REC'D: 01/04/96 CONTROLLED: 01/04/96 DUE: 01/26/96 FROM: I HAVE A DREAM NOTE REA: SUBJECT INFORMS SECRETARY THAT ENRON SUMMARY: GORP HAS MADE A CONTRIBUTION TO "I HAVE A DREAM - HOUSTON" IN THE SECRETARY HONOR SOURCE: PUBLIC MAIL DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER ADDRESSED TO: SECRETARY FOR SIGNATURE OF: SECRETARY ACTION TO: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY ACTION TYPE: Prepare final reply ACTION OFFICER: WALLACE ONCURRENCE COPIES TO: NFORMATION COPIES TO: ES1 TEAM NCURRENCES COMPLETED: EMARKS: :XECUTIVE SECRETARIAT CONTACT: G Holloway -------------------------- EXEC SEC INTERNAL USE ----------------- SUBJECT CROSS REF: SPECIAL INT. CODE:

190

ELECTRICAL SUPPORT SYSTEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this revision of the System Design Description (SDD) is to establish requirements that drive the design of the electrical support system and their bases to allow the design effort to proceed to License Application. This SDD is a living document that will be revised at strategic points as the design matures over time. This SDD identifies the requirements and describes the system design as they exist at this time, with emphasis on those attributes of the design provided to meet the requirements. This SDD has been developed to be an engineering tool for design control. Accordingly, the primary audience/users are design engineers. This type of SDD both ''leads'' and ''trails'' the design process. It leads the design process with regard to the flow down of upper tier requirements onto the system. Knowledge of these requirements is essential in performing the design process. The SDD trails the design with regard to the description of the system. The description provided in the SDD is a reflection of the results of the design process to date. Functional and operational requirements applicable to electrical support systems are obtained from the ''Project Functional and Operational Requirements'' (F&OR) (Siddoway 2003). Other requirements to support the design process have been taken from higher-level requirements documents such as the ''Project Design Criteria Document'' (PDC) (Doraswamy 2004), and fire hazards analyses. The above-mentioned low-level documents address ''Project Requirements Document'' (PRD) (Canon and Leitner 2003) requirements. This SDD contains several appendices that include supporting information. Appendix B lists key system charts, diagrams, drawings, and lists, and Appendix C includes a list of system procedures.

S. Roy

2004-06-24T23:59:59.000Z

191

revision:20090902 modified:20090903  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

871 revision:2009­09­02 modified:2009­09­03 A trichotomy of countable, stable, unsuperstable and DMS 0600940 and Israel Science Foundation Grant no. 242/03. Publica­ tion 871. 1 #12; 871 revision of formulas (see Definition 2.3). The origins of these 2 #12; 871 revision:2009­09­02 modified:2009

Shelah, Saharon

192

DOE/LX/07-0324&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-35 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-35 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 289 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 030110...

193

DOE/LX/07-0149&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-08 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-08 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 315 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031909 REGULATORY...

194

DOE/LX/07-0289&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-335-05 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-335-05 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 301 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 122107; 061410...

195

DOE/LX/07-0264&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-03 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-03 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 310 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 061410 REGULATORY...

196

DOE/LX/07-0276&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-09 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-09 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 264 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 061410 REGULATORY...

197

DOE/LX/07-0281&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-28 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-28 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 284 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 061410 REGULATORY...

198

DOE/LX/07-0313&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-07 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-07 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 262 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 030110...

199

DOE/LX/07-0087&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-41 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-41 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 294 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 033106; 031509...

200

DOE/LX/07-0090&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-335-03 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-335-03 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 299 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 33106; 031509...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

DOE/LX/07-0191&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-331-14 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-331-14 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 248 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 072502, 031509...

202

DOE/LX/07-0309&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-03 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-03 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 258 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 030110...

203

DOE/LX/07-0213&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-06 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-06 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 313 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 030109 REGULATORY...

204

DOE/LX/07-0045&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-331-01 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-331-01 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 235 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 031509 REGULATORY...

205

DOE/LX/07-0314&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-12 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-12 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 267 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 030110...

206

DOE/LX/07-0056&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-331-15 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-331-15 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 249 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 121101; 7202; 3...

207

DOE/LX/07-0058&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-331-19 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-331-19 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 251 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 32103; 031509...

208

DOE/LX/07-0084&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-331-12 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-331-12 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 246 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 012403; 030904;...

209

DOE/LX/07-0154&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-17 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-17 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 324 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031909 REGULATORY...

210

DOE/LX/07-0322&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-30 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-30 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 286 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 030110 REGULATORY...

211

DOE/LX/07-0211&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-02 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-02 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 309 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

212

DOE/LX/07-0280&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-25 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-25 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 281 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 061410 REGULATORY...

213

DOE/LX/07-0088&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-43 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-43 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 296 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 32103, 30904, 02...

214

DOE/LX/07-0236&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-12 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-12 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 319 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 030110 REGULATORY...

215

DOE/LX/07-0342&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-34 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-34 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 288 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 061410...

216

DOE/LX/07-0153&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-15 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-15 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 322 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031909 REGULATORY...

217

DOE/LX/07-0151&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-10 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-10 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 317 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031909 REGULATORY...

218

DOE/LX/07-0274&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-335-08 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-335-08 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 304 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 122107, 061410...

219

DOE/LX/07-0319&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-24 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-24 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 280 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 030110...

220

DOE/LX/07-0326&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-04 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-04 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 311 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 030110 REGULATORY...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

DOE/LX/07-0189&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-310-03 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-310-03 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 232 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

222

DOE/LX/07-0308&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-02 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-02 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 257 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 030110...

223

DOE/LX/07-0085&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-331-16 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-331-16 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 250 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 030303; 033106;...

224

DOE/LX/07-0080&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-331-04 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-331-04 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 238 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

225

DOE/LX/07-0067&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-40 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-40 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 293 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 031509 REGULATORY...

226

DOE/LX/07-0288&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-310-02 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-310-02 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 231 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 011003; 122107;...

227

DOE/LX/07-0148&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-07 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-07 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 314 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

228

DOE/LX/07-0209&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-335-06 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-335-06 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 302 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

229

DOE/LX/07-0066&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-39 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-39 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 292 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 031509 REGULATORY...

230

DOE/LX/07-0152&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-14 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-14 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 321 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031909 REGULATORY...

231

DOE/LX/07-0044&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-310-05 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-310-05 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 234 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 031509 REGULATORY...

232

DOE/LX/07-0065&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-37 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-37 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 290 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

233

DOE/LX/07-0190&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-331-11 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-331-11 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 245 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

234

DOE/LX/07-0048&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-331-03 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-331-03 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 237 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 031509 REGULATORY...

235

DOE/LX/07-0311&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-05 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-05 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 260 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 30110...

236

DOE/LX/07-0068&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-335-01 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-335-01 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 297 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 031509 REGULATORY...

237

DOE/LX/07-0327&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-13 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-13 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 320 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 030110 REGULATORY...

238

DOE/LX/07-0310&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-04 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-04 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 259 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 030110...

239

DOE/LX/07-0155&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-18 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-18 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 325 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031909 REGULATORY...

240

DOE/LX/07-0216&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-16 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-16 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 323 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

DOE/LX/07-0321&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-29 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-29 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 285 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 030110 REGULATORY...

242

DOE/LX/07-0320&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-27 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-27 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 283 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 030110...

243

DOE/LX/07-0208&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-335-02 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-335-02 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 298 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

244

DOE/LX/07-0150&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-09 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-09 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 316 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031909 REGULATORY...

245

DOE/LX/07-0210&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-01 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-01 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 308 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

246

DOE/LX/07-0312&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-06 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-06 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 261 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509, 030110...

247

DOE/LX/07-0091&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-335-12 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-335-12 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 307 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 11105; 031509...

248

DOE/LX/07-0214&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-11 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-11 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 318 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 030109 REGULATORY...

249

DOE/LX/07-0283&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-20 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-20 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 327 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 061410 REGULATORY...

250

DOE/LX/07-0089&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-333-01 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-333-01 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 256 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 033106; 031509...

251

DOE/LX/07-0158&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-32 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-32 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 335 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 52908, 031509...

252

DOE/LX/07-0164&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-39 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-39 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 342 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 020205, 031509...

253

DOE/LX/07-0094&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-43 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-43 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 346 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISION: 33106; 031509...

254

DOE/LX/07-0284&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-36 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-36 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 339 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 061410 REGULATORY...

255

DOE/LX/07-0331&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-409-02 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-409-02 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 355 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 083002, 122107,...

256

DOE/LX/07-0328&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-19 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-19 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 326 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 030110 REGULATORY...

257

DOE/LX/07-0167&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-720-02 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-720-02 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 357 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

258

DOE/LX/07-0157&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-30 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-30 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 333 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

259

DOE/LX/07-0238&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-21 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-21 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 328 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 030110 REGULATORY...

260

DOE/LX/07-0285&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-37 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-37 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 340 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 012403; 061410...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

DOE/LX/07-0159&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-33 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-33 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 336 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

262

DOE/LX/07-0242&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-400-05 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-400-05 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 351 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 080502, 122002,...

263

DOE/LX/07-0218&D1 Secondary Document DMSA C-337-31 Solid Waste...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Document DMSA C-337-31 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Assessment Report SWMUAOC NUMBER: 334 DATE OF ORIGINAL SAR: 120100 DATE OF SAR REVISIONS: 031509 REGULATORY...

264

Untitled Document  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Release Schedule Release Schedule The initial release on April 15 includes a "Legislation and Regulations" section that discusses evolving legislative and regulatory issues, a "Market Trends" section which highlights and summarizes selected aspects of the projections for energy markets, and a comparison of AEO2013 with projections from other organizations. Additional issues analyses and its related data will follow on the dates indicated: Analyses Release Date Oil price and production trends in AEO2013 April 17, 2013 U.S. reliance on imported liquid fuels in alternative scenarios April 17, 2013 Competition between coal and natural gas in the electric power sector April, 23, 2013 Nuclear power in AEO2013 April 25, 2013 Updated no sunset and extended policy cases April 30, 2013

265

Enron Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 :. Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:10 PM Profile Page: 1 Folder Profile Control # 1998000752 Name letter to the Deputy Secretary from the Northeast States for Priority Important Folder Trigger Letter DOE Addressee Source PM-0 Elizabeth Moler I ___I |_______________ Correspondence Date 1/16/98 Subject Text e RE:AIR POLLUTION IMPACTS OF RIDS Information ead of Agency INCREASED DEREGULATION IN THE J ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY: AN INITIAL Sensitivity Not Applicable ANALYSIS - 1115/98 l Classification None Topical Index Point of Contact LOHRM -- i-na--u--e--Ap --- o--al 202 586-0471 Lohr, Michael Signature/Approval l _______________________________ _ . A ction O ffice # I l Action Requested Assigned To Appropriate Action _ PO Special Instructions Date Due I I Date Completed 1121/98

266

Addendum to the post-closure permit application for the Bear Creek Hydrogeologic Regime at the Y-12 Plant: Walk-in pits. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The revised Closure Plan was initially intended to apply to A Area, C-West, B Area, and the Walk-In Pits (WIPs) of the Bear Creek Burial Grounds (BCBG). However, a strategy was developed to include the B Area [a solid waste management unit (SWMU)] with the WIPs so that both areas would be closed under one cap. The plan was presented to the State of Tennessee on March 8, 1990, and the Department of Energy was requested to review other unique alternatives to close the site. Therefore, in November 1992, the Closure Plan for B Area and the WIPs was prepared separately from that of the other sites associated with the BCBG and was presented in a RCRA Closure Plan. The Closure Plan revision issued April 1993 was intended to reflect the placement of the Kerr Hollow Quarry debris at the WIPs, revise the closure data, and acknowledge that the disposition of a monitoring well within the closure site could not be verified. A Post-Closure Permit Application (PCPA) was to include the WIPs; however, at the time of submittal, closure of the WIPs had not been certified. This addendum contains information on the WIPs to accompany the BCBG PCPA. The purpose of this document is to supplement the information provided in the BCBG PCPA. This document is not intended to be a stand-alone document. Only additional information regarding the WIPs is included in the sections of this document, which correspond to sections of the PCPA submitted in June 1994.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

Usage and usefulness of technical software documentation: An industrial case study  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

AbstractContext Software documentation is an integral part of any software development process. However, software practitioners are often concerned about the value, degree of usage and usefulness of documentation during development and maintenance. Objective Motivated by the needs of NovAtel Inc. (NovAtel), a world-leading company developing software systems in support of global navigation satellite systems, and based on the results of a former systematic mapping study, we aimed at better understanding of the usage and the usefulness of various technical documents during software development and maintenance. Method We utilized the results of a former systematic mapping study and performed an industrial case study at NovAtel. From the joint definition of the analysis goals, the research method incorporates qualitative and quantitative analysis of 55 documents (design, test and process related) and 1630 of their revisions. In addition, we conducted a survey on the usage and usefulness of documents. A total of 25 staff members from the industrial partner, all having a medium to high level of experience, participated in the survey. Results In the context of the case study, a number of findings were derived. They include that (1) technical documentation was consulted least frequently for maintenance purpose and most frequently as an information source for development, (2) source code was considered most frequently as the preferred information source during software maintenance, (3) there is no significant difference between the usage of various documentation types during both development and maintenance, and (4) initial hypotheses stating that up-to-date information, accuracy and preciseness have the highest impact on usefulness of technical documentation. Conclusions It is concluded that the usage of documentation differs for various purposes and it depends on the type of the information needs as well as the tasks to be completed (e.g., development and maintenance). The results have been confirmed to be helpful for the company under study, and the firm is currently implementing some of the recommendations given.

Golara Garousi; Vahid Garousi-Yusifo?lu; Guenther Ruhe; Junji Zhi; Mahmoud Moussavi; Brian Smith

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

Microsoft Word - Document Numbering Plan.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

document Number Plan 11/3/2005 document Number Plan 11/3/2005 All documents numbers start with a 9 9 _ _ ___ | | | | | Document per chart | Generation (i.e. PSS has 1,2&3, FEEPS has 1&2) Use 0 when the document doesn't apply to any of these System 0- Non system Specific (group wide) 1- PSS 2- Reserved for PSS expansion 3- FEEPS 4- Reserved for FEEPS expansion 5- BLEPS 6- Reserved for BLEPS expansion 7- DIW 8- Reserved for future use 9- Reserved for future use 000-099 Requirements 000 - Statement of work For x.1.4.1.4 - Design Statement of Work For Beamlines - Installation Statement of Work 001-009 Reserved for Statement of Works for upgrade, revisions, add-ons, etc. 010 - Cost Estimate 011-019 Additional Cost Estimates

269

Requesting a Revision to PUB-3000  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual The following procedure describes the process for making changes to Berkeley Lab's ES&H Manual (PUB-3000). It identifies Responsible Authors who participate in the revision process. A request to revise the ES&H Manual may be initiated by any Berkeley Lab employee; however, all requests must be sent to the Responsible Author and approved by the ES&H Manual Manager, Mike Wisherop. If you wish to request a change to a PUB-3000 chapter, follow these steps: Contact the Responsible Author for the chapter in need of revision. Submit PUB-3000 revisions to the Responsible Author and the ES&H Manual Manager. Direct all questions or comments concerning ES&H Manual content to the ES&H Manual Manager.

270

MONITORED GEOLOGIC REPOSITORY SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document establishes the Monitored Geologic Repository system requirements for the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS). These requirements are based on the ''Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document'' (CRD) (DOE 2004a). The ''Monitored Geologic Repository Systems Requirements Document'' (MGR-RD) is developed in accordance with LP-3.3 SQ-OCRWM, ''Preparation, Review, and Approval of Office of Repository Development Requirements Document''. As illustrated in Figure 1, the MGR-RD forms part of the DOE Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Technical Requirements Baseline. Revision 0 of this document identifies requirements for the current phase of repository design that is focused on developing a preliminary design for the repository and will be included in the license application submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a repository at Yucca Mountain in support of receiving a construction authorization and subsequent operating license. As additional information becomes available, more detailed requirements will be identified in subsequent revisions to this document.

V. Trebules

2006-06-02T23:59:59.000Z

271

Waste generation forecast for DOE-ORO`s Environmental Restoration OR-1 Project: FY 1995-FY 2002, September 1994 revision  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A comprehensive waste-forecasting task was initiated in FY 1991 to provide a consistent, documented estimate of the volumes of waste expected to be generated as a result of U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations (DOE-ORO) Environmental Restoration (ER) OR-1 Project activities. Continual changes in the scope and schedules for remedial action (RA) and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) activities have required that an integrated data base system be developed that can be easily revised to keep pace with changes and provide appropriate tabular and graphical output. The output can then be analyzed and used to drive planning assumptions for treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities. The results of this forecasting effort and a description of the data base developed to support it are provided herein. The initial waste-generation forecast results were compiled in November 1991. Since the initial forecast report, the forecast data have been revised annually. This report reflects revisions as of September 1994.

Not Available

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

Document Library | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Document Library Services » Document Library Document Library January 30, 2006 International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative: Annual Report 2005 The International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative (I-NERI) supports the National Energy Policy by conducting research to advance the state of nuclear science and technology in the United States. I-NERI sponsors innovative scientific and engineering research and development (R&D) in cooperation with participating countries. The research performed under the I-NERI umbrella addresses the key issues affecting the future of nuclear energy and its global deployment. September 18, 2005 Agreement between the Department of Energy of the United States of America and the Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique of France To amend Article 12.1 of the Agreement to read as follows:

273

Clean Cities Annual Metrics Report 2009 (Revised)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Document provides Clean Cities coalition metrics about the use of alternative fuels; the deployment of alternative fuel vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and idle reduction initiatives; fuel economy activities; and programs to reduce vehicle miles driven.

Johnson, C.

2011-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement 6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington The revised draft of the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement (HSW EIS) provides environmental and technical information concerning U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposed waste management practices at the Hanford Site. DOE/EIS-0286, Richland Operations Office, Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary (March 2003) EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-01-2003.pdf EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-02-2003_0.pdf More Documents & Publications

275

Microsoft Word - Creston-Bell Revision Sheet__final.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Creston-Bell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Revision Sheet DOE/EA-4406 Summary Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) released the Creston-Bell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA) in April 2012 for public comment. BPA sent the Preliminary EA to agencies and interested parties. Notification that the EA was available and how to request a copy was sent to all others on the mailing list of potentially affected parties. BPA received six comments and responded to these comments in this revision sheet. This revision sheet documents the changes to be incorporated into the EA. The Preliminary EA, with the addition of these changes, constitutes the Final EA, which will not be reprinted.

276

Document # FOIA-2009-0054 Revision Title FREEDOM OF INFORMATION...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

surface is flush with the geocomposite when placed into the repair area. A geotextile patch shall be cut to cover the repair area and extend a minimum of 6 inches onto the...

277

Regulatory guidance document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Program Management System Manual requires preparation of the OCRWM Regulatory Guidance Document (RGD) that addresses licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance. The document provides: regulatory compliance policy; guidance to OCRWM organizational elements to ensure a consistent approach when complying with regulatory requirements; strategies to achieve policy objectives; organizational responsibilities for regulatory compliance; guidance with regard to Program compliance oversight; and guidance on the contents of a project-level Regulatory Compliance Plan. The scope of the RGD includes site suitability evaluation, licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance, in accordance with the direction provided by Section 4.6.3 of the PMS Manual. Site suitability evaluation and regulatory compliance during site characterization are significant activities, particularly with regard to the YW MSA. OCRWM`s evaluation of whether the Yucca Mountain site is suitable for repository development must precede its submittal of a license application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Accordingly, site suitability evaluation is discussed in Chapter 4, and the general statements of policy regarding site suitability evaluation are discussed in Section 2.1. Although much of the data and analyses may initially be similar, the licensing process is discussed separately in Chapter 5. Environmental compliance is discussed in Chapter 6. Safety and Health compliance is discussed in Chapter 7.

NONE

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

278

Representations, Tools, and Techniques for the Complete Integration of Software Development Documents  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

representations, software tools, and user interface services needed for the complete integration of all documents document and link structure with fine­grained revision control, specialized 1 #12; link semantics The proposed research will identify the document representations, software tools, and user interface services

Baumgartner, Gerald

279

Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The CRD addresses the requirements of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 413.3-Change 1, ''Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets'', by providing the Secretarial Acquisition Executive (Level 0) scope baseline and the Program-level (Level 1) technical baseline. The Secretarial Acquisition Executive approves the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management's (OCRWM) critical decisions and changes against the Level 0 baseline; and in turn, the OCRWM Director approves all changes against the Level 1 baseline. This baseline establishes the top-level technical scope of the CRMWS and its three system elements, as described in section 1.3.2. The organizations responsible for design, development, and operation of system elements described in this document must therefore prepare subordinate project-level documents that are consistent with the CRD. Changes to requirements will be managed in accordance with established change and configuration control procedures. The CRD establishes requirements for the design, development, and operation of the CRWMS. It specifically addresses the top-level governing laws and regulations (e.g., ''Nuclear Waste Policy Act'' (NWPA), 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 63, 10 CFR Part 71, etc.) along with specific policy, performance requirements, interface requirements, and system architecture. The CRD shall be used as a vehicle to incorporate specific changes in technical scope or performance requirements that may have significant program implications. Such may include changes to the program mission, changes to operational capability, and high visibility stakeholder issues. The CRD uses a systems approach to: (1) identify key functions that the CRWMS must perform, (2) allocate top-level requirements derived from statutory, regulatory, and programmatic sources, and (3) define the basic elements of the system architecture and operational concept. Project-level documents address CRD requirements by further defining system element functions, decomposing requirements into significantly greater detail, and developing designs of system components, facilities, and equipment. The CRD addresses the identification and control of functional, physical, and operational boundaries between and within CRWMS elements. The CRD establishes requirements regarding key interfaces between the CRWMS and elements external to the CRWMS. Project elements define interfaces between CRWMS program elements. The Program has developed a change management process consistent with DOE Order 413.3-Change 1. Changes to the Secretarial Acquisition Executive and Program-level baselines must be approved by a Program Baseline Change Control Board. Specific thresholds have been established for identifying technical, cost, and schedule changes that require approval. The CRWMS continually evaluates system design and operational concepts to optimize performance and/or cost. The Program has developed systems analysis tools to assess potential enhancements to the physical system and to determine the impacts from cost saving initiatives, scientific and technological improvements, and engineering developments. The results of systems analyses, if appropriate, are factored into revisions to the CRD as revised Programmatic Requirements.

C.A. Kouts

2006-05-10T23:59:59.000Z

280

Standard format and content acceptance criteria for the Material Control and Accounting (MC and A) Reform Amendment: 10 CFR Part 74, Subpart E. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 1987 the NRC revised the material control and accounting requirements for NRC licensees authorized to possess and use a formula quantity (i.e., 5 formula kilograms or more) of strategic special nuclear material. Those revisions issued as 10 CFR 74.51-59 require timely monitoring of in-process inventory and discrete items to detect anomalies potentially indicative of material losses. Timely detection and enhanced loss localization capabilities are beneficial to alarm resolution and also for material recovery in the event of an actual loss. NUREG-1280 was issued in 1987 to present criteria that could be used by applicants, licensees, and NRC license reviewers in the initial preparation and subsequent review of fundamental nuclear material control (FNMC) plans submitted in response to the Reform Amendment. This document is also intended for both licensees and license reviewers with respect to FNMC plan revisions. General performance objectives, system capabilities, process monitoring, item monitoring, alarm resolution, quality assurance, and accounting are addressed. This revision to NUREG-1280 is an expansion of the initial edition, which clarifies and expands upon several topics and addresses issues identified under Reform Amendment implementation experience.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Celgard US Manufacturing Facilities Initiative for Lithium-ion...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications Celgard US Manufacturing Facilities Initiative for Lithium-ion Battery Separator Celgard US Manufacturing Facilities Initiative for Lithium-ion...

282

SciTech Connect: optimal initial conditions for coupling ice...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Conference: optimal initial conditions for coupling ice sheet models to earth system models Citation Details In-Document Search Title: optimal initial conditions for coupling ice...

283

Carolina Blue Skies & Green Jobs Initiative | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

arravt064tiboyer2012o.pdf More Documents & Publications Carolinas Blue Skies & Green Jobs Initiative Carolina Blue Skies & Green Jobs Initiative New York State-wide...

284

Carolina Blue Skies & Green Jobs Initiative | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

arravt064tiboyer2011p.pdf More Documents & Publications Carolinas Blue Skies & Green Jobs Initiative Carolina Blue Skies & Green Jobs Initiative Puget Sound Clean Cities...

285

Sources: http://www.orau.gov/pbm/documents/overview/uc.html http://oaa.osu.edu/irp/AIR_Professional_File_97.pdf  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Sources: http://www.orau.gov/pbm/documents/overview/uc.html http "Yes," the metric should be revised to track quantitative information about the success of the capital

286

EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » EM Quality Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) Previous revision of the Environmental Management Quality Assurance Program. The program is the EM management system to ensure we"do work correctly." This document has been superseded by Revision 1 of the program, but is still in use at some EM sites. EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) More Documents & Publications Quality Assurance Program EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1) SOPP-43, EM-23 Quality Assurance Oversight Waste Management Nuclear Materials & Waste Tank Waste and Waste Processing Waste Disposition Packaging and Transportation Site & Facility Restoration

287

Decommissioning Documents | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Decommissioning Documents Decommissioning Documents More Documents & Publications Decommissioning Benchmarking Study Final Report Decommissioning Handbook dgappendices.pdf...

288

2009 Revisions EIA-914  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

for Texas, which was partially the cause for the review of the EIA-914, which, in turn, led to the development and implementation of this new methodology. Downward revisions in...

289

Laboratory-Specific-Documentation-HHN.docx CHP updated 8/21/13 Virginia Tech  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Laboratory-Specific-Documentation-HHN.docx CHP updated 8/21/13 Virginia Tech Chemistry Department Chemical Hygiene Plan This CHP applies to rooms Current worker beginning a new task Reviewing a revised edition of the CHP 1

Crawford, T. Daniel

290

Initial Conditions  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Before we can run a transient analysis, we must find the appropriate set of initial conditions for the variables. The most important requirement of initial conditions is that they do not contradict any of the ...

Michael Tiller Ph.D.

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

291

Finding Topics in Collections of Documents: A Shared Nearest Neighbor Approach  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Given a set of documents, clustering is often used to group the documents, in the hope that each group will represent documents with a common theme or topic. Initially, hierarchical clustering was used to clus...

Levent Ertz; Michael Steinbach; Vipin Kumar

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

LWR Sustainability Program Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Program Integrated Program Plan, Revision 2, INL-EXT-11-23452, April 2014. pdf DOE-NE Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program and EPRI Long-Term Operations Program -...

293

Revised 05/21/2014 School of Forensic Sciences  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised 05/21/2014 School of Forensic Sciences 1111 West 17th Street Tulsa, OK 741071898 Country Code Area Code Phone Number Re: Request for Verification of Forensics in Forensic Document Examination (FDE) M.S.F.S. Option in Forensic Science Administration

Veiga, Pedro Manuel Barbosa

294

Documents and Records Management  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Walk into many enterprise organizations and ask someone in a department to describe their document storage and processing operations, and they will likely give you a story about how management of documents and...

Robert Garrett

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

Documents for Foreign Nationals  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

documents as outlined in the chart below. Visa Types and Required Documents J1 Visa F1 Visa H1B Visa B1 Visa WB, WT, TN, or CP Visa Passport Passport Passport Passport...

296

Documents: DUF6 Conversion EIS Supporting Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DUF6 Conversion EIS DUF6 Conversion EIS Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents NEPA Compliance: DUF6 Conversion EIS Supporting Documents PDF Icon Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Approach for the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Conversion Facilities Project 38 KB details PDF Icon Press Release: DOE Seeks Public Input for Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Environmental Impact Statement 90 KB details PDF Icon Advance Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facilities 52 KB details PDF Icon Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facilities 60 KB details PDF Icon Overview: Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Management Program

297

SPEAR3 | Technical Documentation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Documentation Hardware Component Database: Mechanical Electrical Drawing shor tcuts BPM Development SSRL | SLAC | Stanford University | SSRL Computing | SLAC Computing last...

298

PDF Document (1182k)  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Only critical information was scanned. Entire document is available upon request - Click here to email a request....

299

Classification Documents and Publications  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Certain documents and publications created or issued by the Office of Classification are available from this page.

300

GTT Tranmission Workshop- Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Use the links below to download documents from the GTT Transmission Workshop, held November 1-2, 2012.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Record of Decision Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision Offer of Conditional Commitment for a Loan Guarantee for, and Electrical Interconnection of, the Shepherds Flat Wind Project; Bonneville Power Administration The U.S. Department of Energy announces its decisions to provide a conditional loan guarantee for, and interconnection to the Federal Columbia River Transmission River (FCRTS) of, the 846-megawatt (MW) Shepherds. DOE/EIS-0183, Revised Record of Decision for Offer of Conditional Commitment for a Loan Guarantee for, and Electrical Interconnection of, the Shepherds Flat Wind Project; Bonneville Power Administration, (October 2010) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision

302

Office of Document Reviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Document Reviews ensures that all documents prepared at DOE Headquarters are properly marked to identify the level and category of protected information they contain (if any) and to ensure that all documents the Department prepares or is required to review under applicable statutes for public release contain no information requiring protection under law, regulations and Executive orders.

303

Classifying Video Documents by Hierarchical Structure of Video Contents  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Copyright 2000 Article Classifying Video Documents by Hierarchical Structure of Video Contents Duen-Ren Liu 1 Chen-Hsien Lin 1 Jing-Jang...1998. Revised 8 August, 2000. Recent advances in video database technology and increasing use of the World......

Duen-Ren Liu; Chen-Hsien Lin; Jing-Jang Hwang

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

304

FINAL APPROVED VERSION Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Document  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FINAL APPROVED VERSION Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Document College of Engineering Revised of the Eligible Faculty 4 3.1.1 Regular Tenure Track Faculty 4 3.1.2 Regular Clinical Track Faculty 4 3.1.3 Regular Research Track Faculty 5 3.1.4 Conflict of Interest 5 3.1.5 Minimum Composition 5 3.2 Promotion

305

APPOINTMENTS, PROMOTION AND TENURE DOCUMENT DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

APPOINTMENTS, PROMOTION AND TENURE DOCUMENT DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY Revised ­April 7, 2014..........................................................................................5 A. Criteria 1. Tenure-track Faculty 2. Tenure-track Faculty -- Regional Campus 3. Clinical Faculty 4. Research Faculty 5. Associated Faculty 6. Courtesy Appointments B. Procedures 1. Tenure-track

306

ASHRAE Cleanroom Benchmarking Paper - REVISED  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8E 8E Cleanroom Energy Efficiency: Metrics and Benchmarking Paul Mathew, William Tschudi, Dale Sartor Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory James Beasley International SEMATECH Manufacturing Initiative October 2010 Published in ASHRAE Journal, v. 53, issue 10 DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe

307

Download the SunShot Initiative 2014 Portfolio | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Download the SunShot Initiative 2014 Portfolio Download the SunShot Initiative 2014 Portfolio SunShot InitiativeTackling Challenges in Solar2014 Portfolio.pdf More Documents &...

308

PROJECT/CAMPAIGN Document Name  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Canopy Chemistry Program (ACCP) Project/Campaign Document Canopy Chemistry Program (ACCP) Project/Campaign Document Summary: TThe Accelerated Canopy Chemistry Program (ACCP) was charged to determine whether a sound theoretical and empirical basis existed for the estimation of nitrogen and lignin concentrations in ecosystem canopies from remote sensing data. Three streams of activity were initiated to meet this charge: 1) new field and remote sensing data acquisitions for well-characterized sites, 2) canopy-level radiosity and ray-tracing modeling, and 3) intercomparison of information extraction techniques. 1991-1992. Table of Contents: 1 Project/Campaign Overview 2 Data Availability 3 Data Access 4 Principal Investigator Information 5 Submitting Investigator Information 6 References 7 Glossary of Terms 8 List of Acronyms

309

January 12, 2013 CHANGES TO THE BID DOCUMENT IN PURSUANCE TO THE PRE BID CONFERENCE ON JAN. 10, 2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 January 12, 2013 CHANGES TO THE BID DOCUMENT IN PURSUANCE TO THE PRE BID CONFERENCE ON JAN. 10, 2013 In continuation to CCMB Open Tender Document No. CCMB/PUR/EQPT./2012-13 dated 31 refer to the revised specifications attached with this document. 2 Fluorescence Microscope - 1 7

Udgaonkar, Jayant B.

310

revision:19960317 modified:19960317  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

restrict our­ self to certain concrete classes then we may be able to retain compactness. In this paper we375 revision:1996­03­17 modified:1996­03­17 Some Compact Logics ­ Results in ZFC Alan H. Mekler order logic is so strong that it fails to have nice model theoretic properties such as compactness

Shelah, Saharon

311

ARM - Data Documentation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Documentation Documentation Policies, Plans, Descriptions Data Documentation Home Data Sharing and Distribution Policy Data Management and Documentation Plan Data Product Registration and Submission Reading netCDF and HDF Data Files Time in ARM netCDF Data Files Data Archive Documentation ARM Archive's Catalog of Data Streams (Updated monthly) Access to Historical ARM Data More on Understanding and Finding ARM Data Data Quality Problem Reporting Data Documentation A day of data files is bundled or processed into a single 24-hour file that represents a data stream, which is then stored at the ARM Data Archive. A day of data files is bundled or processed into a single 24-hour file that represents a data stream, which is then stored at the ARM Data Archive. Data collected through the routine operations and scientific field

312

Documented Safety Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Documented Safety Analysis Documented Safety Analysis FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: A document that provides an adequate description of the hazards of a facility during its design, construction, operation, and eventual cleanup and the basis to prescribe operating and engineering controls through Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) or Administrative Controls (AC). REQUIREMENTS:  10 CFR 830.204, Nuclear Safety Rule  DOE-STD-1027-92, Hazard Categorization, 1992.  DOE-STD-1104-96, Change Notice 1, Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Documents (documented Safety Analyses and Technical Safety Requirements), dated May 2002.  DOE-STD-3009-2002, Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses, Change Notice No. 2, April 2002.

313

SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Control modules -- Volume 1, Revision 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. This manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for the functional module documentation, and Volume 3 for the documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

Landers, N.F.; Petrie, L.M.; Knight, J.R. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)] [and others

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

314

TUchem Documentation Introduction  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

TUchem Documentation Introduction TUchem is an automated chemical inventory database system design for use in academic environments. TUchem can be used to track inventory for locations, provide up

Wolfgang, Paul

315

RMOTC - Library - Environmental Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Environmental Documents The U.S. Department of Energy National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires careful consideration of the potential environmental consequences of all...

316

FTCP Guiding Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Guiding Documents includes Key FTCP Directives, Qualification Standards, Functional Area Qualification Standard (FAQS) Qualification Cards, and Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Accreditation.

317

EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Record of Decision Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project This notice announces the availability of the Revised ROD to offer contract terms for an optional electrical interconnection of the proposed Summit/Westward Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System at a point near the existing Wauna Substation of the Clatskanie People's Utility District (CPUD), Columbia County, Oregon. EIS-0183; Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision for the Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project (October 2004) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Record of Decision EIS-0349: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision

318

EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision 183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project This notice announces the availability of the Revised ROD to offer contract terms for an optional electrical interconnection of the proposed Summit/Westward Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System at a point near the existing Wauna Substation of the Clatskanie People's Utility District (CPUD), Columbia County, Oregon. EIS-0183; Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision for the Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project (October 2004) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Record of Decision

319

KSCI-19033: Kepler Instrument Handbook 7/15/09 Document Control  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;#12;KSCI-19033: Kepler Instrument Handbook 7/15/09 3 of 103 Document Control Ownership Configuration Management system. Changes to this document shall be controlled. Physical Location The physical Instrument Handbook 7/15/09 4 of 103 Known Revisions for Next Version The following items require significant

Sirianni, Marco

320

MODIFICATIONS PROCESSING PROCEDURE This document outlines the DUHS IRB procedure for preparing and processing the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 MODIFICATIONS PROCESSING PROCEDURE 6/2/2011 This document outlines the DUHS IRB procedure to choose. The Mods request asks the PI to submit a point-by-point response as well as revised documents from the PI with submission of the tracked version of the changes. If the PI has not submitted

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Guidelines for Emotion Annotation in AMI (based on the original FeelTrace documentation)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Guidelines for Emotion Annotation in AMI (based on the original FeelTrace documentation) Revision. This scheme uses a program called FEELTRACE to track the perceived emotional state in data continuously over time. This document is an almost exact reproduction of the guidelines that are provided

Edinburgh, University of

322

Intitial Release ISDF-010, After Action Report Revision History:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

405 405 Intitial Release ISDF-010, After Action Report Revision History: Rev. Description of Change Parent Document: Notify of Changes: ISDP-002, Training Production Process EOTA Employees Referenced Documents: Document Owner: Approvers: Mary McLane Melissa Otero Backup Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Company - Business Form Insert Logo Here Document Title: After Action Report Calculation Template Document Number: ISDF-048, After Action Report Caluclation Template Rev 11_0405 NAME OF COURSE Course Dates: Years of Experience in Emergency Operations/Response XX students in the course; only received XX surveys Highest Level of Education DOE/NNSA Federal Employee: 0 0.00% High School/equivalent: 0 0.00% DOE/NNSA Contractor: 0 0.00% Some College: 0 0.00% Other: 0 0.00% Undergraduate: 0 0.00% Total Responses:

323

Appendix A: Conceptual Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NREL-Research Support Facilities TABLE OF CONTENTS NREL-Research Support Facilities TABLE OF CONTENTS Solicitation No. RFJ-8-77550 Appendix A: Conceptual Documents Page 1 of 299 February 6, 2008 Appendix A CONCEPTUAL DOCUMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 2 PART 1-PROCEDURES .......................................................................................................... 3 PART 2-PROGRAM ............................................................................................................... 59 PART 3-PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS .................................................................... 245 APPENDIX LIST .................................................................................................................. 299

324

NEED HELP ? Submitting Documents  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the questions. Have you ever tried to follow a recipe? If you dump all the ingredients in a bowl without first in mind that incomplete documents will not be posted to your record and will be returned to you. 4. Follow students fax in documents and drop off or mail in paper copies. This is twice the work load and slows down

de Lijser, Peter

325

IMPRESS CONNECT DOCUMENT ORDERING  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

IMPRESS CONNECT DOCUMENT ORDERING USER GUIDE FOR UNF August 2010 #12;OFFICEMAX IMPRESS CONNECT USERMax (case sensitive) Click on "Create New Custom Print Order" under Print & Document Services #12;The first landing page. You will see 3 options across the top of the landing page: Order Jobs, Track Jobs, Manage

Asaithambi, Asai

326

Project Documentation Group Members  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

agencies to track client services and outcomes, thus providing sound documentation that justifies stateCSC 4330 Project Documentation 11/30/2009 Group Members: Andy Bursavich Justin Farr Will Folse Chris Miceli Michael Miceli #12;Group Answers I. The Title ­ UREC Client Tracking System II. The project

Kundu, Sukhamay

327

Documents Notes Requirements  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Documents Notes Common Requirements Application Form(typed) with 3 photos attached(3.5 x 4.5cm(including National Intelligence & Security Track), International Trade, International Finance, Korea and East Asia for Application : November 13(Tue), 2012 · Announcement of Documents Screening Results : 2 pm on November 21(Wed

Jang, Ju-Wook

328

Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Tracking Document for Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) 4/17/2013 In the time since Revision 02 of the DOE Challenge Home National Program Requirements was released, DOE has modified, clarified, and refined various aspects of the program documents, primarily in response to partner questions and comments. This document is a summary of these edits, organized by the section of the National Program Requirements in which they appear. DOE has also posted the revised National Program Requirements, labeled Rev. 03, on its Web site at www.buildings.energy.gov/challenge. All revisions are categorized as a Change, Clarification, or Refinement. These are defined as follows: Change - The addition, deletion, or modification of a program requirement. A change will typically result from a partner

329

CAPTURE DOCUMENT ORAUTEAM  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATA DATA CAPTURE DOCUMENT ORAUTEAM ---- Dose Reconstruction ~v~:7 DISCOVERY AND REVIEW dA'~ Project for NIOSH The attached document may contain Privacy Act data. This information is protected by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. §552a; disclosure to any third party without written consent of the individual to whom the information pertains is strictly prohibited. Data Capture Team or Other ORAU Team Member Capturing Data: Complete all information that applies to the data/document being submitted lor uploading to the Site Research Database (SRDB), attach this lonm to the lront olthe document, and send to: ORAU Team, Attention: SRDB Uploading, 4850 Smith Rd., Suite 200, Cincinnati, Ohio 45212. I ~ -!-R"e"guestor and Reviewer 1. Data Requestor: RSET Group 2. Reviewer Name (if different from Requestor): Don Morris 3. Target Data: Document Specified by Requestor Any relevant

330

Cray XT Documentation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Cray XT Documentation Cray XT Documentation Cray XT Documentation & Cray XT Documentation Search Preferences | Advanced Search Home Browse Books Man Pages Glossary Platforms Cray XC30 Cray XE and Cray XK Cray XT Cray Sonexion Cray X2 Cray X1 Knowledge Base by Category by Date by Platform by Title by User Release Announcements @Twitter Cray XT System Documentation Getting Started Cray XT System Overview Cray Linux Environment (CLE) Software Release Overview Cray Linux Environment (CLE) Software Release Overview Supplement Glossary of Terms Programming Environment Cray Application Developer's Environment User's Guide Cray Compiling Environment (CCE) Cray Fortran Reference Manual crayftn man page Cray C and C++ Reference Manual craycc man page crayCC man page Intrinsic function man pages Assign environment man pages

331

HNF-37489-FP Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HNF-37489-FP HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Project Hanford Management Contractor foc the US. Deparbnsnt of Energy under Contract DE-ACO6-96RL13200 FLUOR, P.O. Box 1000 Richland, Washington Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-I 189-2008, Appendix A HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-1189- 2008, Appendix A S. K. Omberg Fluor Government Group Date Published April 2008 To Be Presented at The Nuclear Renaissanm. Safety Analysls for the New Nuclear Age Energy Facility Contractow Group May 3 - 8,2008 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Pmject Hanford Management CcntractOr for the US. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC0696RL132W FLUOR, P.O. Box I000

332

ADR Revised Policy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Revised Policy Statement. SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and other collaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts.

333

CRADA Order Revision  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CRADA Order Revision CRADA Order Revision Linda Field Patent Counsel Department of Energy Goal CRADA Order DOE O 483.1 CRADA Manual DOE M 483.1-1 CRADA Order DOE O XXXX.X Departmental Directive Program Types of Directives Policies Regulations Orders Notices Manuals Guides Technical Standards Departmental Directive Program Directives Life Cycle Development Coordination Implementation Review (Certification) Development Phase *Orders are uploaded to RevCom for review and comment by all affected parties *60 days to develop draft & submit to MA-90 *Solicits input from stakeholders ( incl. field, contractors, and/or program counsel) Coordination Phase *MA-90 parses directive & sets due dates for review & comment *HQ Directives Points of Contact (DPCs) *Have 45 days to submit official comments on behalf of their

334

Development of an energy-use estimation methodology for the revised Navy Manual MO-303  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Navy commissioned Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) to revise and/or update the Navy Utilities Targets Manual, NAVFAC MO-303 (U.S. Navy 1972b). The purpose of the project was to produce a current, applicable, and easy-to-use version of the manual for use by energy and facility engineers and staff at all Navy Public Works Centers (PWCs), Public Works Departments (PWDs), Engineering Field Divisions (EFDs), and other related organizations. The revision of the MO-303 manual involved developing a methodology for estimating energy consumption in buildings and ships. This methodology can account for, and equitably allocate, energy consumption within Navy installations. The analyses used to develop this methodology included developing end-use intensities (EUIs) from a vast collection of Navy base metering and billing data. A statistical analysis of the metering data, weather data, and building energy-use characteristics was used to develop appropriate EUI values for use at all Navy bases. A complete Navy base energy reconciliation process was also created for use in allocating all known energy consumption. Initial attempts to use total Navy base consumption values did not produce usable results. A parallel effort using individual building consumption data provided an estimating method that incorporated weather effects. This method produced a set of building EUI values and weather adjustments for use in estimating building energy use. A method of reconciling total site energy consumption was developed based on a {open_quotes}zero-sum{close_quotes} principle. This method provides a way to account for all energy use and apportion part or all of it to buildings and other energy uses when actual consumption is not known. The entire text of the manual was also revised to present a more easily read understood and usable document.

Richman, E.E.; Keller, J.M.; Wood, A.G.; Dittmer, A.L.

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

Corel Office Document  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Effective Date 08/03/2010 Effective Date 08/03/2010 WP 08-PT.08 Revision 6 WIPP Centralized Procurement Program Plan Cognizant Section: Packaging Approved by: Todd Sellmer Working Copy WIPP Centralized Procurement Program Plan WP 08-PT.08, Rev. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................ iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ...........................................................................................

336

Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: SSAB Members (J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, P. Claire, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters) The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance and direction for restructuring and managing the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards procurement mechanisms that support activities of the Boards. Roberson Memorandum - July 7, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

337

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) 20-page "how-to" guide describing ways to turn a disaster into an opportunity to rebuild with greener energy technologies. It covers such topics as the importance of energy, options for communities, instructions for developing an energy plan, and other considerations. This guide is intended for the community leaders who have experienced a disaster. 45136.pdf More Documents & Publications Greensburg Webinars Q&A From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE

338

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) 20-page "how-to" guide describing ways to turn a disaster into an opportunity to rebuild with greener energy technologies. It covers such topics as the importance of energy, options for communities, instructions for developing an energy plan, and other considerations. This guide is intended for the community leaders who have experienced a disaster. 45136.pdf More Documents & Publications From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE

339

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Content includes EERE subject matter and mentions DOE's role in rebuilding. The layout is designed to be used as a template for other cities in similar situations. 45086.pdf More Documents & Publications NREL Helps Greensburg Set the Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Innovation: The Spectrum of Clean Energy Innovation, NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) A Tale of Two Cities: Greensburg Rebuilds as a National Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Greensburg, Kansas: Building a Model Green Community, How Would You Rebuild a Town - Green? April 2009 (Brochure)

340

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Content includes EERE subject matter and mentions DOE's role in rebuilding. The layout is designed to be used as a template for other cities in similar situations. 45086.pdf More Documents & Publications A Tale of Two Cities: Greensburg Rebuilds as a National Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) NREL Helps Greensburg Set the Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Innovation: The Spectrum of Clean Energy Innovation, NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Greensburg, Kansas: Building a Model Green Community, How Would You Rebuild a Town - Green? April 2009 (Brochure)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

EIS-0218: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revision of the Record of Decision for a Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Revision of the Record of Decision for a Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel DOE has decided to extend the FRR SNF Acceptance Policy for an additional 10 years beyond its current expiration until May 12, 2016, for irradiation of eligible fuel, and until May 12, 2019, for fuel acceptance. DOE has also decided to include the Australian RRR as a reactor eligible to participate in the acceptance program. For the small amount of RRR fuel that would be added to 1996 estimates, DOE will continue limitations on shipment cask curie activity and will ensure that the upper limit estimate for the source term assumed in the FRR SNF EIS accident analysis will not be exceeded. EIS-0218-RevisedROD-2004.pdf More Documents & Publications

342

Lake Michigan Corridor Alternative Fuel Implementation Initiative  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fleet Program (Indiana) 2.4: Document Success and Quantify Impact 2.5: Generation of Smart Green Purchasing Policy Task 3: Barrier Reduction Initiatives 3.1: Weights and...

343

GENII Guidance Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

GENII Computer Code GENII Computer Code Application Guidance for Documented Safety Analysis Final Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety, and Health 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20585-2040 July 2004 GENII Guidance Report July 2004 Final Report INTENTIONALLY BLANK ii GENII Guidance Report July 2004 Final Report FOREWORD This document provides guidance to Department of Energy (DOE) facility analysts in the use of the GENII computer code for supporting Documented Safety Analysis applications. Information is provided herein that supplements information found in the GENII documentation provided by the code developer. GENII is one of six computer codes designated by the DOE Office of Environmental, Safety and Health as a toolbox code for safety analysis.

344

Meeting Decisions and Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Meeting Notices Meeting Decisions & Documents Production Team Indicators System Coastal Resilience Resources Make Our Science Accessible Link Climate Change & Health Provide Data and Tools Coordinate Internationally Meeting Decisions and Documents Print E-mail This page summarizes the decisions made by the National Climate Assessment Development and Advisory Committee (NCADAC) and the documents the committee has adopted in association with those decisions. The documents and decisions concern the operation of the committee, the content of the synthesis report(s), the sustained assessment process, and other important guidance and responsibilities. The full and official meeting records of the NCADAC are available on a dedicated NOAA page. To view the Federal Register notices announcing the meetings of the NCADAC, please click here.

345

Frequently Requested Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Frequently Requested Documents Frequently Requested Documents Frequently Requested Documents This is an index of frequently requested documents provided by the Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office. You must use the Adobe Acrobat file reader to read the files. If you do not have the reader you can download it free from http://get.adobe.com/reader/. FOIA Requests Received by DOE-ID in 2013 (pdf) April - ID-2013-00854 AMWTP - Charcoal filter breakdown in PAPRs - 600 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon Employee Concern - 135 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon All Hands Feedback - 63 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon AMWTP Employee Concern Ltr 1 - 70 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon RE: Please contact - ITG, about the EC interview (by B&W) - 43 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon RE: Please contact - ITG, about the EC interview (by B&W) - 69 KB Adobe Acrobat Icon

346

Transportation System Requirements Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Transportation System Requirements Document (Trans-SRD) describes the functions to be performed by and the technical requirements for the Transportation System to transport spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) from Purchaser and Producer sites to a Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) site, and between CRWMS sites. The purpose of this document is to define the system-level requirements for Transportation consistent with the CRWMS Requirement Document (CRD). These requirements include design and operations requirements to the extent they impact on the development of the physical segments of Transportation. The document also presents an overall description of Transportation, its functions, its segments, and the requirements allocated to the segments and the system-level interfaces with Transportation. The interface identification and description are published in the CRWMS Interface Specification.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

ARM - Program Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Glossary Logos Contacts RSS for Publications Program Documents Annual Reports FY 2013 (PDF, 7.2MB) FY 2012 (PDF, 1.2MB) FY 2011 (PDF, 4.4MB) FY 2010 (PDF, 2.1MB) FY 2009...

348

UESC Enabling Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentationgiven at the Spring 2009 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meetingdiscusses the enabling documents to help federal contract officers establish utility energy service contracts (UESCs).

349

Document Type: Subject Terms  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Title: Authors: Source: Document Type: Subject Terms: Abstract: Full Text Word Count: ISSN the department back on track. The action is to call a meeting of the team leaders and stress the urgency o

Major, Arkady

350

SCB initiator  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A detonator for high explosives initiated by mechanical impact includes a cylindrical barrel, a layer of flyer material mechanically covering the barrel at one end, and a semiconductor bridge ignitor including a pair of electrically conductive pads connected by a semiconductor bridge. The bridge is in operational contact with the layer, whereby ignition of said bridge forces a portion of the layer through the barrel to detonate the explosive. Input means are provided for igniting the semiconductor bridge ignitor.

Bickes, Jr., Robert W. (Albuquerque, NM); Renlund, Anita M. (Albuquerque, NM); Stanton, Philip L. (Albuquerque, NM)

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

351

Revised: 1/29/2013 Supplementary Information Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, NMFS prepared the Environmental Assess- ment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory FlexibilityRevised: 1/29/2013 Supplementary Information Report for the 2013 Annual Deployment Plan foreign fleets to observing domestic fleets. The Observer Pro- gram provides the regulatory framework

352

Nevada Test Site waste acceptance criteria [Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Revision one updates the requirements, terms, and conditions under which the Nevada Test Site (NTS) will accept low-level radioactive and mixed waste for disposal; and transuranic and transuranic mixed waste for interim storage at the NTS. Review each section of this document. This document is not intended to include all of the requirements; rather, it is meant as a guide toward meeting the regulations. All references in this document should be observed to avoid omission of requirements on which acceptance or rejection of waste will be based. The Department of Energy/Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) and support contractors are available to assist you in understanding or interpreting this document.

None

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

353

Parallel programming with PCN. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

PCN is a system for developing and executing parallel programs. It comprises a high-level programming language, tools for developing and debugging programs in this language, and interfaces to Fortran and Cthat allow the reuse of existing code in multilingual parallel programs. Programs developed using PCN are portable across many different workstations, networks, and parallel computers. This document provides all the information required to develop parallel programs with the PCN programming system. It includes both tutorial and reference material. It also presents the basic concepts that underlie PCN, particularly where these are likely to be unfamiliar to the reader, and provides pointers to other documentation on the PCN language, programming techniques, and tools. PCN is in the public domain. The latest version of both the software and this manual can be obtained by anonymous ftp from Argonne National Laboratory in the directory pub/pcn at info.mcs. ani.gov (cf. Appendix A). This version of this document describes PCN version 2.0, a major revision of the PCN programming system. It supersedes earlier versions of this report.

Foster, I.; Tuecke, S.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

354

EA-1086: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) 6: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) EA-1086: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to issue as a final rulemaking an amended version of 10 CFR Part 835, "Occupational Radiation Protection." The amended version provides nuclear safety requirements that, if violated, provide DOE a basis for assessment of civil and criminal penalties under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 31, 1996 EA-1086: Finding of No Significant Impact Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) August 31, 1996 EA-1086: Final Environmental Assessment Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98)

355

Document Normalization Revisited Abdur Chowdhury  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for fundamentally different document collections. We recomputed the normalization for the web track and obtainedDocument Normalization Revisited Abdur Chowdhury America Online Reston, Virginia chowdhury Pivoted Document Length Normalization has reached a point of stability where many researchers

Chowdhury, Abdur

356

EIA model documentation: Electricity market module - electricity fuel dispatch  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the National Energy Modeling System Electricity Fuel Dispatch Submodule (EFD), a submodule of the Electricity Market Module (EMM) as it was used for EIA`s Annual Energy Outlook 1997. It replaces previous documentation dated March 1994 and subsequent yearly update revisions. The report catalogues and describes the model assumptions, computational methodology, parameter estimation techniques, model source code, and forecast results generated through the synthesis and scenario development based on these components. This document serves four purposes. First, it is a reference document providing a detailed description of the model for reviewers and potential users of the EFD including energy experts at the Energy Information Administration (EIA), other Federal agencies, state energy agencies, private firms such as utilities and consulting firms, and non-profit groups such as consumer and environmental groups. Second, this report meets the legal requirement of the Energy Information Administration (EIA) to provide adequate documentation in support of its statistical and forecast reports. Third, it facilitates continuity in model development by providing documentation which details model enhancements that were undertaken for AE097 and since the previous documentation. Last, because the major use of the EFD is to develop forecasts, this documentation explains the calculations, major inputs and assumptions which were used to generate the AE097.

NONE

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

357

Building a Model for Augmented Design Documentation 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

process. The initial focus of the work is on HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) design. We checkers use the documentation to verify whether the project is in accordance with the codes and standards

Endler, Markus

358

documentation | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

documentation documentation Dataset Summary Description (Abstract): The Kenya Country Report describes the energy situation in Kenys and identifies solar and wind energy opportunities. (Purpose): To influence investment decisions by promoting and supporting renewable energy by overcoming informational barriers in solar and wind energy financing. Source Daniel Theuri - SWERA National Team Date Released November 23rd, 2008 (5 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords documentation Kenya renewable energy solar SWERA UNEP wind Data application/pdf icon Download Report (pdf, 9.3 MiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Time Period 2008 License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) Comment Rate this dataset

359

Microsoft Word - Document2  

Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

09 09 D I S C L A I M E R This document was designed for the internal use of the United States Department of Energy. This document will be occasionally updated and, therefore, this copy may not reflect the most current version. This document was prepared as account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by

360

Waste acceptance criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Revision 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Revision 4 of the Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC), WIPP-DOE-069, identifies and consolidates existing criteria and requirements which regulate the safe handling and preparation of Transuranic (TRU) waste packages for transportation to and emplacement in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This consolidation does not invalidate any existing certification of TRU waste to the WIPP Operations and Safety Criteria (Revision 3 of WIPP-DOE--069) and/or Transportation: Waste Package Requirements (TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report for Packaging [SARP]). Those documents being consolidated, including Revision 3 of the WAC, currently support the Test Phase.

Not Available

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Proposed Revisions for Regents Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Proposed Revisions for Regents Policy: Faculty Tenure Arlene Carney Vice Provost for Faculty family friendliness for probationary period #12;Basis for Revisions of Faculty Tenure Policy · Changed definitions of Academic Freedom and Responsibility required changes in the tenure policy. · As more untenured

Amin, S. Massoud

362

REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

predictions October 1964 Report of the FEDERAL RADIATION COUNCIL #12;REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates estimate and does not change the 30-year and 70-year dose estimates made on the basis of the originalREPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates for 1964-1965 and verification of the 1963

363

Microsoft Word - Document1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

strategy to reduce energy waste and greenhouse gases, the TEAM initiative seeks to reduce energy intensity across DOE's nationwide complex by at least 30 percent and to reduce...

364

ENDF-201 Supplement 1. ENDF/B-V. 2 summary documentation. Third edition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the present publication is to provide the summary documentation for Revision 2 of the General Purpose File of ENDF/B-V. Revision 2 embodies a series of updates for important materials in the ENDF/B-V libraries in advance of the more comprehensive changes that will accompany a complete version change to ENDF/B, Verison VI. The summary documents for the evaluations that were completely or extensively modified during Revision 2 are provided. Less extensive changes made to other evaluations are also documented. Modifications made to the fission energy release parameters for fissionable nuclei are described. Finally, a series of modifications made to the covariance files of the major fissionable nuclei, including cross correlation information, is summarized. (LEW)

Magurno, B.A.; Young, P.G. (comps.)

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

Enforcement Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Documents Enforcement Documents RSS December 2, 2014 Consent Order, Battelle Energy Alliance - NCO-2014-02 Nuclear Safety Enforcement Consent Order issued to Battelle Energy...

366

UESC Enabling Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Innovation for Our Energy Future Innovation for Our Energy Future Karen Thomas National Renewable Energy Laboratory Biloxi, Mississippi May 6, 2009 Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents 2009 Interim Update FEMP's UESC Enabling Documents Details: Legislation and Executive actions Legal opinions Agency guidance ...and more www.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/28792.pdf National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future PURPOSE * Designed to assist federal agency and utility staff involved in administering utility energy service projects * Clearly show that federal agencies have the authority to enter

367

Appendix G Supporting Documentation  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Supporting Documentation Supporting Documentation for Focused Feasibility Study This page intentionally left blank Contents Section Ground Water Models for Alternatives 3 and 4 ........................................................................ G .O Human Health Risk Assessment Calculations ........................................................................... G2.0 Cost Analysis ........................................................................................................................... G3.0 This page intentionally left blank Section G1.0 Ground Water Models for Alternatives 3 and 4 This page intentionally left blank D o c o l ~ ~ e n t Nurt~her Q0029500 Appendix G MMTS OU 111 Feasibility Study Ground Water Modeling for Alternative 3: PRB Treatment Objective

368

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 August 29, 2013 - 4:19pm...

369

Miscellaneous States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4...

370

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision 1) ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision 1) This schedule covers audiovisual and related records created by or for...

371

Document Icons and Page Thumbnails: Issues in Construction of Document  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Document Icons and Page Thumbnails: Issues in Construction of Document Thumbnails for Page appropriately. #12;Document Icons and Page Thumbnails: Issues in Construction of Document Thumbnails for Page, called doc- ument icons, are discussed; one algorithm, called log-area, seems most effective. 1

Janssen, Bill

372

Document Normalization Revisited Cosine Pivoted Document Length Normalization has  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

submitted results to the TREC-10 web track. 2. Calibrating the Slope for Ad Hoc Task Using pivoted documentDocument Normalization Revisited Abstract Cosine Pivoted Document Length Normalization has reached for the document collection degrades average precision by as much as 20%. 1. Introduction The cosine measure

373

Fig 9-revised Flowchart.xls  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

9 9 Soil Nature and Extent AOI Identification Process d The PRG value for lead is not a calculated PRG, but rather is taken from the EPA guidance document Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Correction Action Facilities (1994). e For surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft), WRW surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft) PRGs are used. For subsurface soil (0.5 ft to a maximum depth of 209 ft), WRW subsurface soil (0.5 to 8 ft) PRGs are used. a Soil "superset" for soil samples collected from June 28, 1991 through August 22, 2005. c Soil PRGs are defined as 1 x 10 -6 WRW PRGs based on using an HI of 0.1 or a risk of 1 x 10 -6 (the more conservative of the two values was used for the PRG). b Background level is defined as the background M2SD. RI-Ready Soil Data

374

Guidance Document Cryogenic Liquids  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Guidance Document Cryogenic Liquids [This is a brief and general summary. Read the full MSDS for more details before handling.] Introduction: All cryogenic liquids are gases at normal temperature liquefies them. Cryogenic liquids are kept in the liquid state at very low temperatures. Cryogenic liquids

375

ENERGY REVIEW Consultation Document  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENERGY REVIEW Consultation Document JANUARY 2006 Our Energy Challenge Securing clean, affordable energy for the long-term #12;Our Energy Challenge Securing clean, affordable energy for the long term #12;OUR ENERGY CHALLENGE ­ SECURING CLEAN, AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR THE LONG TERM ii Why is the government

376

document accom sumed, therefore  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

S document accom sumed, therefore to submitting the Asper School of iboine Commun River College, an usiness should plete the Applica ness under Track ADMISSION SCHOOL O WITH: ASS ?COLE TEC RED RIVER COLLEGE O ents or Track 2. N REQUIREM F BUSINESS SINIBOINE C CHNIQUE ET R COLLEGE, OF THE NOR ve a minimum C Business

Major, Arkady

377

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 2, 2007 November 2, 2007 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) is pleased to announce the release of the 2008 Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). This revision replaces the 2005 MERRTT CD-ROM set. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, the 2008 MERRTT has been sent to the Occupational, Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for review. The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students'

378

SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Functional modules F9--F16 -- Volume 2, Part 2, Revision 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. The manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for functional module documentation; and Volume 3--for documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries. This volume discusses the following functional modules: MORSE-SGC; HEATING 7.2; KENO V.a; JUNEBUG-II; HEATPLOT-S; REGPLOT 6; PLORIGEN; and OCULAR.

West, J.T.; Hoffman, T.J.; Emmett, M.B.; Childs, K.W.; Petrie, L.M.; Landers, N.F.; Bryan, C.B.; Giles, G.E. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Functional modules F1--F8 -- Volume 2, Part 1, Revision 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. The manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation; Volume 2--for functional module documentation; and Volume 3--for documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

Greene, N.M.; Petrie, L.M.; Westfall, R.M.; Bucholz, J.A.; Hermann, O.W.; Fraley, S.K. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

380

Hanford Facility dangerous waste permit application, general information. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The current Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application is considered to be a single application organized into a General Information Portion (this document, number DOE/RL-91-28) and a treatment, storage, and/or disposal Unit-Specific Portion, which includes documentation for individual TSD units (e.g., document numbers DOE/RL-89-03 and DOE/RL-90-01). Both portions consist of a Part A division and a Part B division. The Part B division consists of 15 chapters that address the content of the Part B checklists prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology 1987) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (40 Code of Federal Regulations 270), with additional information requirements mandated by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 and revisions of Washington Administrative Code 173-303. For ease of reference, the Washington State Department of Ecology checklist section numbers, in brackets, follow the chapter headings and subheadings. Documentation contained in the General Information Portion (i.e., this document, number DOE/RL-91-28) is broader in nature and applies to all treatment, storage, and/or disposal units for which final status is sought. Because of its broad nature, the Part A division of the General Information Portion references the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Part A Permit Application (document number DOE/RL-88-21), a compilation of all Part A documentation for the Hanford Facility.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Latest Documents and Notices | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2011 1, 2011 EA-1793: Final Environmental Assessment Replacement Capability for Disposal of Remote-Handled Low-Level Radioactive Waste Generated at the Department of Energy's Idaho Site December 20, 2011 EA-1851: Finding of No Significant Impact Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application (December 2011) December 20, 2011 EA-1851: Final Environmental Assessment Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application (December 2011) December 20, 2011 EIS-0439: Record of Decision Rice Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, CA December 19, 2011 EA-1919: Notice of Revision to Clearance Policy Recycle of Scrap Metals Originating from Radiological Areas (December 2011)

382

Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7/30/2013 7/30/2013 Vehicle Setup Information Downloadable Dynamometer Database (D 3 )- Test Summary Sheet Vehicle Architecture Alt Fuel- CNG Vehicle Dynamometer Input 2012 Honda Civic GX Test Cell Location Front Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date 7/30/2013 Revision Number 1 Vehicle Dynamometer Input Test weight [lb] 3192 Test Fuel Information MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Revision Number 1 Notes: Test weight [lb] Target A [lb] 3192 22.2037 Target B [lb/mph] Target C [lb/mph^2] 0.45855 0.01263 Test Fuel Information MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Fuel type Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Fuel density [g/ml] Fuel Net HV [BTU/lbm] 0.5872 905.3 Fuel type Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) T e s t I D [ # ] C y c l e C o l d s t a r t ( C S t ) H o t s t a r t

383

Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10/18/2013 10/18/2013 Vehicle Setup Information Downloadable Dynamometer Database (D 3 )- Test Summary Sheet Vehicle Architecture Conventional Vehicle Dynamometer Input 2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI Test Cell Location Front Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date 10/18/2013 Revision Number 1 Vehicle Dynamometer Input Test weight [lb] 3516 Test Fuel Information Revision Number 1 Notes: Test weight [lb] Target A [lb] 3516 30.1456 Target B [lb/mph] Target C [lb/mph^2] 0.37653 0.015662 Test Fuel Information Fuel type 2007 Certification Diesel HF0583 Fuel density [g/ml] Fuel Net HV [BTU/lbm] 0.855 18355 Fuel type 2007 Certification Diesel HF0583 T e s t I D [ # ] C y c l e C o l d s t a r t ( C S t ) H o t s t a r t [ H S t ] D a t e T e s t C e l l T e m p [ C ] T e s t C e l l R H [ % ] T e s t C e l l B a r o [ i n / H g ] V e h i c l e c o o l i n g f a n s p e e d : S p e e d M a t

384

Document Reviews | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Document Reviews Document Reviews Document Reviews The Office of Document Reviews, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security information and document declassification efforts promote the release of information needed by an informed citizenry to understand and oversee the actions of its Government. To meet our mission requirements, the Office of Document Reviews: Conducts pre-publication reviews of documents generated in classified subject areas at Headquarters that are to be released to the public. Conducts document reviews for other HSS and Headquarters organizations to identify classified and controlled unclassified information. Reviews classified documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act for the Department and denies the release of the document in total or provides a redacted copy for release to the requester.

385

Latest Documents and Notices  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

latest-documents-notices Office of National latest-documents-notices Office of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Policy and Compliance 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585 202-586-4600 en EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0488-epa-notice-availability-draft-environmental-impact-statement EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement

386

Solar Background Document 3 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

3 Solar Background Document 3 A list of private sector investment in Solyndra. Solar Background Document 3.pdf More Documents & Publications Solar Background Document 2 GridWise...

387

Document Control Program | The Ames Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Training, Documents, & Records Document Control Program The Document Control (DC) Plan ensures that only approved, current versions of such documents are used in the workplace or...

388

An automatically constructed thesaurus for neural network based document categorization  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper presents a method for computing a thesaurus from a text corpus, and combined with a revised back-propagation neural network (BPNN) learning algorithm for document categorization. Automatically constructed thesaurus is a data structure that accomplished by extracting the relatedness between words. Neural network is one of the efficient approaches for document categorization. However the conventional BPNN has the problems of slow learning and easy to involve into the local minimum. We use a revised algorithm to improve the conventional BPNN that can overcome these problems. A well constructed thesaurus has been recognized as valuable tool in the effective operation of document categorization, it overcome some problem for the document categorization based on bag of words which ignored the relationship between words. To investigate the effectiveness of our method, we conducted the experiments on the standard Reuter-21578. The experimental results show that the proposed model was able to achieve higher categorization effectiveness as measured by the precision, recall and F-measure.

Cheng Hua Li; Wei Song; Soon Cheol Park

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview The steps for authorization of your experiment are described below. The ALS Experiment Coordinators are available to support you through this process. Please This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at any stage if you have questions or need more information. Prior to Your Arrival at the ALS 1. Complete or Update and Experiment Safety Sheet If you did not submit a General User Proposal, you must submit an ESS one month prior to arrival at the ALS. 2. Biological, Radioactive, Hazardous, and Electrical Materials, and Lasers If your experiment involves the use of any of the above materials-no matter how small the quantities are or how innocuous the sample may be-additional authorization may be required. Please submit your ESS early and clearly identify your materials. Our staff will assess the hazards and contact you about any necessary supplementary documentation.

390

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview The steps for authorization of your experiment are described below. The ALS Experiment Coordinators are available to support you through this process. Please This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at any stage if you have questions or need more information. Prior to Your Arrival at the ALS 1. Complete or Update and Experiment Safety Sheet If you did not submit a General User Proposal, you must submit an ESS one month prior to arrival at the ALS. 2. Biological, Radioactive, Hazardous, and Electrical Materials, and Lasers If your experiment involves the use of any of the above materials-no matter how small the quantities are or how innocuous the sample may be-additional authorization may be required. Please submit your ESS early and clearly identify your materials. Our staff will assess the hazards and contact you about any necessary supplementary documentation.

391

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview The steps for authorization of your experiment are described below. The ALS Experiment Coordinators are available to support you through this process. Please This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at any stage if you have questions or need more information. Prior to Your Arrival at the ALS 1. Complete or Update and Experiment Safety Sheet If you did not submit a General User Proposal, you must submit an ESS one month prior to arrival at the ALS. 2. Biological, Radioactive, Hazardous, and Electrical Materials, and Lasers If your experiment involves the use of any of the above materials-no matter how small the quantities are or how innocuous the sample may be-additional authorization may be required. Please submit your ESS early and clearly identify your materials. Our staff will assess the hazards and contact you about any necessary supplementary documentation.

392

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview The steps for authorization of your experiment are described below. The ALS Experiment Coordinators are available to support you through this process. Please This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at any stage if you have questions or need more information. Prior to Your Arrival at the ALS 1. Complete or Update and Experiment Safety Sheet If you did not submit a General User Proposal, you must submit an ESS one month prior to arrival at the ALS. 2. Biological, Radioactive, Hazardous, and Electrical Materials, and Lasers If your experiment involves the use of any of the above materials-no matter how small the quantities are or how innocuous the sample may be-additional authorization may be required. Please submit your ESS early and clearly identify your materials. Our staff will assess the hazards and contact you about any necessary supplementary documentation.

393

North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) Program Information |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) Program Information North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) Program Information North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) Program Information Summary of the Transmission Reliability program's North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) activity area. NASPI supports industry adoption of next-generation monitoring equipment to increase reliability and reduce costs for consumers through the development of secure, highspeed, time-synchronized data about bulk power system conditions. North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) Program Factsheet.pdf More Documents & Publications Synchrophasor Technologies and their Deployment in the Recovery Act Smart Grid Programs (August 2013) 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations

394

343. Document entitled "Develop "Frontier" Resources to Ensure Future Oil and Na  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3. Document entitled "Develop "Frontier" Resources to Ensure Future Oil and Natural Gas 3. Document entitled "Develop "Frontier" Resources to Ensure Future Oil and Natural Gas Supply," dated March 8, 2001. B-5 Exemption - Information withheld (under Exemption 5) consists of deliberative material reflecting comments, recommendations and revisions of draft documents relating to NEPDG. 2 pages. #4139-4140 Withheld 344. Document entitled "The Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve," dated March 7, 2001. B-5 Exemption - Information withheld (under Exemption 5) consists of deliberative material reflecting comments, recommendations and revisions of draft documents relating to NEPDG. 2 pages. #4141-4142 Withheld 345. Document entitled "The Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve," dated March 8, 2001. B- 5 Exemption -

395

OMB Circular A-76 (Revised)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 May 29, 2003 CIRCULAR NO. A-76 (REVISED) TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS SUBJECT: Performance of Commercial Activities 1. Purpose. This circular establishes federal policy for the competition of commercial activities. 2. Supersession. This circular supersedes Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-76 (Revised 1999), August 4, 1983; Circular No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook (Revised 2000), March 1996; Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter 92-1, "Inherently Governmental Functions," September 23, 1992; and OMB Transmittal Memoranda 1 through 25, Performance of Commercial Activities. 3. Authority. Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (31 U.S.C. § 1111); Executive Order 11541; the Office

396

FOR OFFICERS REVISED AND PUBLISHED  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Council 2007 Revision HANOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE #12;To Dartmouth Club Officers: The development) 646-2253 Career Services (603) 646-2215 Club Mailings, Lists, Changes (603) 646-3497 Club Scholarships ............................................................................................................................ 8 Public Information Chair

Lotko, William

397

GETEM Manuals and Revision Notes  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Please refer to these manuals and revision notes prior to downloading and running theGeothermal Electricity Technology Evaluation Model (GETEM). Because this is a beta version, you are urged to...

398

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program (SRP-UDP), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. The SRP-UDP has been completed and the SRP-Maintenance Program (SRP-MP) is now maintaining this listing. Besides updating previous information, Revision 3 adds approximately 80 citations. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Enforcement Manual, Generic Letters, Inspection Manual, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, Standard Technical Specifications and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Nickolaus, J.R.; Bohlander, K.L.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

399

Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711)Revision 3: Update Methodology and Key Revisions  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the human factors engineering (HFE) programs of applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits, operating licenses, standard design certifications, and combined operating licenses. The purpose of these safety reviews is to help ensure that personnel performance and reliability are appropriately supported. Detailed design review procedures and guidance for the evaluations is provided in three key documents: the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711), and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). These documents were last revised in 2007, 2004 and 2002, respectively. The NRC is committed to the periodic update and improvement of the guidance to ensure that it remains a state-of-the-art design evaluation tool. To this end, the NRC is updating its guidance to stay current with recent research on human performance, advances in HFE methods and tools, and new technology being employed in plant and control room design. NUREG-0711 is the first document to be addressed. We present the methodology used to update NUREG-0711 and summarize the main changes made. Finally, we discuss the current status of the update program and the future plans.

OHara J. M.; Higgins, J.; Fleger, S.

2012-07-22T23:59:59.000Z

400

Policy and Guidance Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis HS-20 Home Mission & Functions » Office of Nuclear Safety, Quality Assurance & Environment » Sustainability Support » Environmental Policy & Assistance » Corporate Safety Programs » Analysis Program Contacts What's New? Sustainability Support Environment Corporate Safety Programs Analysis Environment Environmental Policy Environmental Guidance Environmental Reports Environmental Management System Radiation Protection Environmental Compliance Environmental Justice Environmental Training Environmental Tools Search Our Documents Topics & Resources Air Analytical Services Program CERCLA Cultural & Natural Resources DOE Comments on Rulemakings Federal Environmental Laws

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

PCA, Continuous, & Epidural Narcotic Infusion Documentation (07.2013) Documentation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PCA, Continuous, & Epidural Narcotic Infusion Documentation (07.2013) Documentation Required Continuous Narcotic Infusions PCA Only PCA + Basal (Continuous) Infusion Epidural and Epidural PCA Continuous Verification AND Documentation of Dose / Rate of Infusion of · Every 4 hours (may be done as part of change

Oliver, Douglas L.

402

Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial 8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Attached is Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Richard Bonnell of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division at (202) 287-1747 or at richard.bonnell@hq.doe.gov. Flash 2013-38 Revisions to the Merit Review Guide 2013.pdf Merit Review Guide FINAL JULY 2013 ATTACHMENT 1 Sample Merit Rev Panel Appt Letter 1-10.docx ATTACHMENT 2 Sample COI ADDED WB LANGUAGE JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 3 - Sample Evaluation and Selection Plan JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 4 Sample Noncompetitive Review Plan.docx ATTACHMENT 5 Sample Initial Compliance Review 1-16.docx

403

last revision edited by  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The IAEA-NDS-reports should not be considered as formal publications. When a nuclear data library is sent out by the IAEA Nuclear Data Section, it will be accompanied by an IAEA-NDS-report which should give the data user all necessary documentation on contents, format and origin of the data library. IAEA-NDS-reports are updated whenever there is additional information of relevance to the users of the data library. For citations care should be taken that credit is given to the author of the data library and/or to the data centre which issued the data library. The editor of the IAEA-NDS-report is usually not the author of the data library. Neither the originator of the data libraries nor the IAEA assume any liability for their correctness or for any damages resulting from their use.

Naohiko Otsuka; Naohiko Otsuka

404

Cray XC30 User Documentation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Documentation Documentation Cray XC30 User Documentation L Cray XC30 Documentation Search Preferences | Advanced Search Home Browse Books Man Pages Glossary Platforms Cray XC30 Cray XE and Cray XK Cray XT Cray Sonexion Cray X2 Cray X1 Knowledge Base by Category by Date by Platform by Title by User Release Announcements @Twitter Cray XC30 System Documentation This site map also contains legacy documentation. Always consult the latest version of documentation for your site-specific configuration and ask your Cray Customer Service representative for additional guidance on the latest software documents. Getting Started Cray Linux Environment (CLE) Software Release Overview Programming Environment Cray Programming Environments User Guide Cray Compiling Environment (CCE) Cray Fortran Reference Manual

405

Adaptive and Temporallydependent Document Filtering  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Adaptive and Temporally­dependent Document Filtering een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Document Filtering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3 Filtering Filtering Track 57 5.1 What is TREC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 5

Arampatzis, Avi

406

The Revised Austin Energy Code and Comparisons with the Texas State Energy Standard  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

For the past two years the City of Austin Energy Code has been under review using the State Energy Standard and ASHRAE 90.2P as models for the revised Austin Energy Code. The major changes to these documents are presented in this paper....

Crow, G.

407

Recommended HSE-7 documents hierarchy  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report recommends a hierarchy of waste management documents at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL or ``Laboratory``). The hierarchy addresses documents that are required to plan, implement, and document waste management programs at Los Alamos. These documents will enable the waste management group and the six sections contained within that group to satisfy requirements that are imposed upon them by the US Department of Energy (DOE), DOE Albuquerque Operations, US Environmental Protection Agency, various State of New Mexico agencies, and Laboratory management.

Klein, R.B.; Jennrich, E.A.; Lund, D.M.; Danna, J.G. [Rogers and Associates Engineering Corp., Salt Lake City, UT (United States); Davis, K.D.; Rutz, A.C. [Wastren, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

1990-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

408

Recommended HSE-7 documents hierarchy  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report recommends a hierarchy of waste management documents at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL or Laboratory''). The hierarchy addresses documents that are required to plan, implement, and document waste management programs at Los Alamos. These documents will enable the waste management group and the six sections contained within that group to satisfy requirements that are imposed upon them by the US Department of Energy (DOE), DOE Albuquerque Operations, US Environmental Protection Agency, various State of New Mexico agencies, and Laboratory management.

Klein, R.B.; Jennrich, E.A.; Lund, D.M.; Danna, J.G. (Rogers and Associates Engineering Corp., Salt Lake City, UT (United States)); Davis, K.D.; Rutz, A.C. (Wastren, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States))

1990-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

409

From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised) (Fact Sheet) From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised) (Fact Sheet) These Greensburg fact sheet sheets help citizens understand what they can do as a part of the focus. Saving energy & water, using renewable energy (particular interest in small wind), driving "green", general sustainability, & living green. 45138.pdf More Documents & Publications From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE (Fact Sheet) Rebuilding Greensburg, Kansas, as a Model Green Community: A Case Study; NREL's Technical Assistance to Greensburg, June 2007-May 2009 From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding with Renewable Energy after Disaster,

410

Seismic analyses of equipment in 2736-Z complex. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the structural qualification for the existing equipment when subjected to seismic loading in the Plutonium Storage Complex. It replaces in entirety Revision 0 and reconciles the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) comments on Revision 0. The Complex consists of 2736-Z Building (plutonium storage vault), 2736-ZA Building (vault ventilation equipment building), and 2736-ZB Building (shipping/receiving, repackaging activities). The existing equipment structurally qualified in this report are the metal storage racks for 7 inch and lard cans in room 2 of Building 2736-Z; the cubicles, can holders and pedestals in rooms 1, 3, and 4 of Building 2736-Z; the ventilation duct including exhaust fans/motors, emergency diesel generator, and HEPA filter housing in Building 2736-ZA; the repackaging glovebox in Building 2736-ZB; and the interface duct between Buildings 2736-Z and 2736-ZA.

Ocoma, E.C.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Initial Radionuclide Inventories  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this analysis is to provide an initial radionuclide inventory (in grams per waste package) and associated uncertainty distributions for use in the Total System Performance Assessment for the License Application (TSPA-LA) in support of the license application for the repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. This document is intended for use in postclosure analysis only. Bounding waste stream information and data were collected that capture probable limits. For commercially generated waste, this analysis considers alternative waste stream projections to bound the characteristics of wastes likely to be encountered using arrival scenarios that potentially impact the commercial spent nuclear fuel (CSNF) waste stream. For TSPA-LA, this radionuclide inventory analysis considers U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) high-level radioactive waste (DHLW) glass and two types of spent nuclear fuel (SNF): CSNF and DOE-owned (DSNF). These wastes are placed in two groups of waste packages: the CSNF waste package and the codisposal waste package (CDSP), which are designated to contain DHLW glass and DSNF, or DHLW glass only. The radionuclide inventory for naval SNF is provided separately in the classified ''Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Technical Support Document'' for the License Application. As noted previously, the radionuclide inventory data presented here is intended only for TSPA-LA postclosure calculations. It is not applicable to preclosure safety calculations. Safe storage, transportation, and ultimate disposal of these wastes require safety analyses to support the design and licensing of repository equipment and facilities. These analyses will require radionuclide inventories to represent the radioactive source term that must be accommodated during handling, storage and disposition of these wastes. This analysis uses the best available information to identify the radionuclide inventory that is expected at the last year of last emplacement, currently identified as 2030 and 2033, depending on the type of waste. TSPA-LA uses the results of this analysis to decay the inventory to the year of repository closure projected for the year of 2060.

H. Miller

2004-09-19T23:59:59.000Z

412

Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments DRAFT OMB CIRCULAR A-76 (NOVEMBER 14, 2002) REVIEW COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL COMMENTS: The Department of Energy (DOE) supports the overarching goal of OMB Circular A-76 that agencies should obtain "the best deal to the Taxpayer." We also support revisions to the Circular that "Keep the Process Moving" with the end result being: Faster/Cheaper Competitions; Improved Performance and Measures; Enhanced/Expanded Competition; Fairness; Realizing Significant Savings; and the Redirection of Resources to Mission Critical Requirements. Upon review of the draft Circular, the Department believes the proposed changes to Circular reflect a general improvement over the current version. The Department does, however, have

413

DOE Standard 3009-2014, Preparation of Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis, Roll Out Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Nuclear Safety is performing a series of site visits to provide roll-out training and assistance to Program and Site Offices and their contractors on effective implementation of the new revision to DOE Standard 3009-2014, Preparation of Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis.

414

SCALE: A modular code system for performing Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation. Volume 2, Part 3: Functional modules F16--F17; Revision 5  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automated the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.3 of the system.

NONE

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

SCALE: A modular code system for performing Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation. Volume 1, Part 2: Control modules S1--H1; Revision 5  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automated the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.3 of the system.

NONE

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110-5 Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110-5 Policy Flash Revised Continuing Appropriations...

417

Microsoft Word - Document1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Greg Coulter [mailto:greg.coulter405@gmail.com] Greg Coulter [mailto:greg.coulter405@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 4:13 PM To: Barhydt, Laura Cc: Armstrong, Ashley; Leon Chapa Ismael Ricardo (GE Infra Energy Subject: GE-Prolec CCE Meeting October 19,2010 Ms. Barhydt, This e-mail documents the GE-Prolec CCE meeting of October 19, 2010 concerning Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014. Mr. Ismael Leon and myself met with Ms. Ashley Armstrong, Ms. Celia Sher, Ms. Stephanie Weiner, and Ms. Laura Barhydt in your offices and discussed the attached charts concerning this NOPR. We appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and share a dialogue on the existing rule and changes outlined in the latest NOPR. You had specifically asked us to provide additional comments on our Issue #1. After further review, we continue to believe that the variety in

418

Enron Documents 1995  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET IMPORTANT ES NUMBER: ES95-000672 EXTERNAL 'E OF DOC: 01/10/95 REC'D: 01/13/95 CONTROLLED: 01/13/95 DUE: FROM: HILLINGS,E JOSEPH DC O NOTES AREA: ENRON WASHINGTON, INC. SUBJECT ENCLOSES MOST RECENT ISSUE OF SUMMARY: "ENRON BUSINESS" SOURCE: PUBLIC MAIL DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER ADDRESSED TO: SECRETARY FOR SIGNATURE OF: ACTION TO: POLICY ACTION TYPE: For your information ACTION OFFICER: ~~~~~~~NCURRENCE COPIES TO: NCURRENCE COPIES TO: -- FORMATION COPIES TO: ES1 TM2 CURRENCES COMPLETED: :MARKS: :ECUTIVE SECRETARIAT CONTACT: Joyce Harrod 6-5131 --------------------------- EXEC SEC INTERNAL PSE ------------- SUBJECT CROSS REF: SPECIAL INT. CODE: SLATED CODE/NUMBER: SPECIAL INT. DATE:

419

PETSc: Documentation: FAQ  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FAQ FAQ Home Download Features Documentation Manual pages and Users Manual Citing PETSc Tutorials Installation SAWs Changes Bug Reporting Code Management FAQ License Linear Solver Table Applications/Publications Miscellaneous External Software Developers Site General How can I subscribe to the PETSc mailing lists? Any useful books on numerical computing? What kind of parallel computers or clusters are needed to use PETSc? What kind of license is PETSc released under? Why is PETSc programmed in C, instead of Fortran or C++? Does all the PETSc error checking and logging reduce PETSc's efficiency? How do such a small group of people manage to write and maintain such a large and marvelous package as PETSc? For complex numbers will I get better performance using C or C++? How come when I run the same program on the same number of processes

420

Preliminary Safety Assessment Document  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

LCSAD-001, Ver. 2 LCSAD-001, Ver. 2 Linac Commissioning Safety Assessment Document for the National Synchrotron Light Source II Photon Sciences Directorate Version 2 May 11, 2011 Prepared by Brookhaven National Laboratory P.O. Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973-5000 managed by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Basic Energy Science under contract DE-AC02-98CD10886 ii National Synchrotron Light Source II ii LT-C-ESH-LCSAD-001 ii DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Preliminary Safety Assessment Document  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

BCSAD-001 BCSAD-001 Photon Sciences Directorate Booster Commissioning Safety Assessment Document For the National Synchrotron Light Source II Version 2 December 8, 2011 Prepared by Brookhaven National Laboratory P.O. Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973-5000 managed by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Basic Energy Science under contract DE-AC02-98CD10886 ii National Synchrotron Light Source II Photon Sciences Directorate ii DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any

422

Cray XC30 User Documentation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Cray XC30 Cray XC30 Documentation Cray XC30 User Documentation L Cray XC30 Documentation Search Preferences | Advanced Search Home Browse Books Man Pages Glossary Platforms Cray XC30 Cray XE and Cray XK Cray XT Cray Sonexion Cray X2 Cray X1 Knowledge Base by Category by Date by Platform by Title by User Release Announcements @Twitter Cray XC30 System Documentation This site map also contains legacy documentation. Always consult the latest version of documentation for your site-specific configuration and ask your Cray Customer Service representative for additional guidance on the latest software documents. Getting Started Cray Linux Environment (CLE) Software Release Overview Programming Environment Cray Programming Environments User Guide Cray Compiling Environment (CCE) Cray Fortran Reference Manual

423

NEPA Documents | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Documents Documents NEPA Documents To see a list of available NEPA documents by type and sorted by publication date, click on the links below. Documents listed in this section are available to members of the public. To see documents not electronically available to the public see the Secure NEPA Documents page for more information. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Categorical exclusions are categories of actions that DOE has determined, by regulation, do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and for which, therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement normally is required. DOE's categorical exclusions are listed in Appendices A and B to Subpart D of its NEPA regulations,10 CFR Part 1021.

424

Identity Implications of Influence Goals: Initiating, Intensifying, and Ending Romantic Relationships  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The current work explores the generalizability of a revised analysis of face and facework (Wilson, Aleman, & Leatham, 1998) by investigating the potential face threats that concern young adults as they seek to initiate, ...

Kunkel, Adrianne; Wilson, Steven R.; Olufowote, James O.; Robson, Scott

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

Revised evaluations for ENDF/B-VI Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this paper is to report on revised cross-section evaluations for 17 nuclides that have been prepared for ENDF/B-VI Revision 2. The nuclides considered include five fission products and various isotopes of cadmium and hafnium. The previous ENDF/B-VI evaluations for these 17 nuclides were carried over from ENDF/B-V and were completed in the 1974--1980 time period. By utilizing the experimental data that have become available since 1980 the revised evaluations will result in significant improvements in the evaluated nuclear data files. The primary emphasis was placed on the resolved and unresolved resonance regions, but new experimental data were also used to improve the cross sections for energies above the unresolved resonance region. Negative elastic scattering cross sections were encountered in some of the previous evaluations; since the revised evaluations use multilevel Breit-Wigner (MLBW) parameters, rather than single-level Breit-Wigner (SLBW), this problem is eliminated.

Wright, R.Q.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 326: Areas 6 and 27 Release Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document constitutes an addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 326: Areas 6 and 27 Release Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 1), December 2002 as described in the document Supplemental Investigation Report for FFACO Use Restrictions, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (SIR) dated November 2008. The SIR document was approved by NDEP on December 5, 2008. The approval of the SIR document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR removals. In conformance with the SIR document, this addendum consists of: This page that refers the reader to the SIR document for additional information The cover, title, and signature pages of the SIR document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the SIR document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the UR for CAS 06-25-01, CP-1 Heating Oil Release. This UR was established as part of a Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) corrective action and is based on the presence of contaminants at concentrations greater than the action levels established at the time of the initial investigation (FFACO, 1996). Since this UR was established, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective actions (RBCA) have changed. Therefore, this UR was reevaluated against the current RBCA criteria as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006). This re-evaluation consisted of comparing the original data (used to define the need for the UR) to risk-based final action levels (FALs) developed using the current Industrial Sites RBCA process. The re-evaluation resulted in a recommendation to remove the UR because contamination is not present at the site above the risk-based FALs. Requirements for inspecting and maintaining this UR will be canceled, and the postings and signage at this site will be removed. Fencing and posting may be present at this site that are unrelated to the FFACO UR such as for radiological control purposes as required by the NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual (NNSA/NSO, 2004). This modification will not affect or modify any non-FFACO requirements for fencing, posting, or monitoring at this site.

Grant Evenson

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

BPA revises oversupply rate proposal  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

oversupply-rate-proposal Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives...

428

SAVANNAH RIVER SITE COLD WAR HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WAR HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION WAR HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION NARRATIVE AND PHOTOGRAPHY CMX AND TNX SAVANNAH RIVER'S PILOT PLANTS Aiken County, South Carolina SAVANNAH RIVER SITE COLD WAR HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION CMX AND TNX CMX AND TNX SA SA V V ANNAH RIVER'S ANNAH RIVER'S PILOT PLANTS PILOT PLANTS Aiken County, South Carolina NARRATIVE AND PHOTOGRAPHY ii ABSTRACT This documentation was prepared in accordance with a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed by the Department of Energy-Savannah River (DOE-SR) and the South Carolina Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) dated February 27, 2003, as well as the Consolidated MOA of August 2004. The MOA stipulated a thematic study and photographic documentation of 679-T and 678-T, known respectively as the CMX and TNX buildings. Initially, this area was called the CMX-TNX

429

Fermilab Engineering Manual Appendices Revision 1.0  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Fermilab Engineering Manual Appendices Revision 1.0 Page 1 FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY:__________________________ DATE:_________ REVISION NO.________ REVISION ISSUE DATE:____________ #12;Fermilab Engineering Manual ..................................... 166 #12;Fermilab Engineering Manual Appendices Revision 1.0 Page 3 A. REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS

Quigg, Chris

430

Revised ground-water monitoring compliance plan for the 300 area process trenches  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains ground-water monitoring plans for process-water disposal trenches located on the Hanford Site. These trenches, designated the 300 Area Process Trenches, have been used since 1973 for disposal of water that contains small quantities of both chemicals and radionuclides. The ground-water monitoring plans contained herein represent revision and expansion of an effort initiated in June 1985. At that time, a facility-specific monitoring program was implemented at the 300 Area Process Trenches as part of a regulatory compliance effort for hazardous chemicals being conducted on the Hanford Site. This monitoring program was based on the ground-water monitoring requirements for interim-status facilities, which are those facilities that do not yet have final permits, but are authorized to continue interim operations while engaged in the permitting process. The applicable monitoring requirements are described in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 40 CFR 265.90 of the federal regulations, and in WAC 173-303-400 of Washington State's regulations (Washington State Department of Ecology 1986). The program implemented for the process trenches was designed to be an alternate program, which is required instead of the standard detection program when a facility is known or suspected to have contaminated the ground water in the uppermost aquifer. The plans for the program, contained in a document prepared by the US Department of Energy (USDOE) in 1985, called for monthly sampling of 14 of the 37 existing monitoring wells at the 300 Area plus the installation and sampling of 2 new wells. 27 refs., 25 figs., 15 tabs.

Schalla, R.; Aaberg, R.L.; Bates, D.J.; Carlile, J.V.M.; Freshley, M.D.; Liikala, T.L.; Mitchell, P.J.; Olsen, K.B.; Rieger, J.T.

1988-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

431

Revised Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Summit/Westward Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to amend its July 25, 2003, Record of Decision (ROD) regarding the proposed Summit/Westward Project (Project) to offer contract terms for an optional interconnection of this Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). Under this optional interconnection plan, BPA would integrate electric power from the Project into the FCRTS at a point adjacent to Clatskanie People's Utility District (CPUD) existing Wauna Substation. In order to deliver power to this location, CPUD would develop a new substation (Bradbury Substation) at a site near the Project and a new 230-kV transmission line from there to CPUD's Wauna Substation, which is already connected to the FCRTS. As part of this revised decision, BPA will facilitate CPUD development of the Bradbury-Wauna transmission line by allowing joint use of BPA right-of-way. This will involve reconstructing a section of BPA's 115-kV Allston-Astoria No. 1 transmission line from single-circuit H-frame wood-pole design to double-circuit single metal pole design. Terms of BPA participation in CPUD's development of the Bradbury-Wauna transmission line will be documented in a Construction Agreement. This optional interconnection plan is in addition to BPA's previous offer for interconnection of the Project at BPA's Allston Substation, as documented in the July 25, 2003, ROD. As with the initial interconnection plan, the decision to offer terms to interconnect the Project through the optional interconnection plan is consistent with BPA's Business Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (BP EIS) (DOE/EIS-0183, June 1995), and the Business Plan Record of Decision (BP ROD, August 1995). This decision thus is similarly tiered to the Business Plan ROD.

N /A

2004-10-21T23:59:59.000Z

432

Solar Background Document 6 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Background Document 6 Graph illustrating solar cell production in the United States and China from 2002 to 2010. Solar Background Document 6.pdf More Documents & Publications Solar...

433

Reports and Other Documents | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Reports and Other Documents Reports and Other Documents Reports and other documents from DOE and other relevant agencies, listed by topic. AUGUST 2003 BLACKOUT CONTROL SYSTEMS...

434

Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document This document specifies the top-level...

435

Solar Background Document 5 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

5 Solar Background Document 5 Graph illustrating Chinese Development Bank financing to Chinese solar companies. Solar Background Document 5.pdf More Documents & Publications Solar...

436

Solar Background Document 6 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

6 Solar Background Document 6 Graph illustrating solar cell production in the United States and China from 2002 to 2010. Solar Background Document 6.pdf More Documents &...

437

Solar Background Document 4 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

4 Solar Background Document 4 Graph illustrating global distribution of solar manufacturing market share from 1990 to 2010. Solar Background Document 4.pdf More Documents &...

438

Cryogenic System Revised June 1994  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Chapter 9. Cryogenic System Revised June 1994 9.1. Introduction 9.2. Heat Loads and Refrigeration Duties -- 175 -- #12; 176 Cryogenic System #12; Cryogenic System 177 9.3. Two Phase Helium Cooling 9.4. The Refrigerator and Control #12; 178 Cryogenic System 9.5. Cryogen Delivery and Control 9.6. Three Cooling

Brookhaven National Laboratory - Experiment 821

439

(Revised May 25, 2012) Radioactivity  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

(Revised May 25, 2012) Radioactivity GOALS (1) To gain a better understanding of naturally-occurring. (3) To measure the amount of "background radiation" from natural sources. (4) To test whether and man-made radiation sources. (2) To use a Geiger-Mueller tube to detect both beta and gamma radiation

Collins, Gary S.

440

Annotated outlines for documents required by FFA and CERCLA for Oak Ridge Reservation sites  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annotated outlines approved by the Document Content and Response Committee (DCRC) and issued in ``Revision O`` of this document include those for preliminary assessments/site inspections, remedial investigation (RI) work plans, RI reports, feasibility studies, Proposed Plans, interim records of decision (IRODs), and records of decision (RODs). These annotated outlines for documents required by the Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) have been developed by the DCRC to ensure document format consistency across the Oak Ridge Reservation. The outlines have been developed to comply with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCIA), integrating National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Natural Resources Damages Act requirements and other applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements. Additional annotated outlines for documents required by the FFA that the DCRC plans to issue at a later date include outlines for remedial design work plans, remedial design reports, remedial action work plans, and postconstruction reports. As necessary, these outlines will be revised to reflect new regulatory requirements and/or document comments received from the regulatory agencies as the CERCLA remediation process for the various sites progresses. The outlines prepared by the DCRC contain important guidelines and provide logical formats for preparation of defensible and consistent documents for the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) Environmental Restoration (ER) Program. These outlines were prepared using existing regulatory, DOE, and ER Program guidance or requirements, in order to incorporate several requirements into a single summary.

Not Available

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston and Masoniella Vockeroth (Diptera: Tethinidae) GEORGE A O G Y · N U M B E R 6 1 9 A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston and Masoniella Vockeroth. Mathis. A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston and Masoniella Vockeroth (Diptera: Tethinidae

Mathis, Wayne N.

442

AutoCAD discipline layering convention. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a user`s guide to establishing layering standards for drawing development. Uniform layering standards are established to exchange of AutoCAD datasets between organizations and companies. Consistency in the layering conventions assists the user through logical separation and identification of drawing data. This allows the user to view and plot related aspects of a drawing separately or in combination. The use of color and Linetype by layer is the preferred layering convention method, however to accommodate specific needs, colors and linetypes can also be assigned on an entity basis. New drawing setup files (also identified in AutoCAD documentation as Prototype drawings) use this layering convention to establish discipline drawing layers that are routinely used. Additions, deletions or revisions to the layering conventions are encourage.

Nielsen, B.L.

1995-05-17T23:59:59.000Z

443

Microsoft Word - Document3  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Research Power Users Symposium II July 12, 1994 Research Power Users Symposium II July 12, 1994 Parallel Plasma Fluid Turbulence Calculations J. N. Leboeuf, B. A. Carreras, L. A. Charlton, J. B. Drake, V. E. Lynch, D. E. Newman, K. L. Sidikman and D. A. Spong Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8071 The study of plasma turbulence and transport is a complex problem of critical importance for fusion- relevant plasmas. To this day, the fluid treatment of plasma dynamics is the best approach to realistic physics at the high resolution required for certain experimentally relevant calculations. Core and edge turbulence in a magnetic fusion device have been modeled using state-of-the-art, nonlinear, three- dimensional, initial-value fluid and gyrofluid codes. Parallel implementation of these models on diverse

444

Microsoft Word - Document3  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Northern New Mexico Northern New Mexico Math and Science Academy 2012 Evaluation Report Submitted by Barbara Trujillo, PhD. barbt@comcast.net Project Evaluation Period: September 2011 - October 2012 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY It's a kind of synthesis, but with some elements that perhaps you wouldn't have expected in advance. I always like that when it happens, when something comes that is more than the sum of its parts. - Evan Parker, British Jazz Musician This report presents findings of the 2011-2012 formative evaluation of the Northern New Mexico Math and Science Academy (MSA), an initiative of the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The primary objective of MSA is to provide high quality professional development (PD) in order to improve the teaching and learning of

445

Microsoft Word - Document4  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2003 6, 2003 National Petroleum Council Washington, DC Remarks by Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham NATIONAL ENERGY PLAN Today is an important day. It marks the second anniversary of President Bush's National Energy Plan. While it may not rise to the level of a federal holiday, for those of us in the Bush Administration, it's a pretty important date. When President Bush took office, he understood the short and long-term energy problems our nation faced. He also understood that we had to forge new approaches to solve old problems. The National Energy Plan did that by providing a bold vision to help ensure our energy future. I'm proud of what we've been able to accomplish in two short years. With exciting programs such as FreedomCar, the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative, and the

446

WordPerfect Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Motion to Dismiss Name of Case: Gilbert J. Hinojos Date of Filing: April 21, 2003 Case Number: TBZ-0003 This determination will consider a Motion to Dismiss filed by Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies (Honeywell) on April 21, 2003. Honeywell seeks dismissal of the underlying complaint filed by Gilbert J. Hinojos under the Department of Energy's Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. I. Background Mr. Hinojos was employed by Honeywell as a "Material Control Coordinator, Sr." at a DOE facility i n Albuquerque New Mexico. Initially, Mr. Hinojos alleges that he was subject to two acts of retaliation from Honeywell due to his having filed several complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

447

WordPerfect Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 25, 2003 June 25, 2003 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Initial Agency Decision Name of Petitioner: Elaine M. Blakely Date of Filing: September 30, 2002 Case Number: VBH-0086 This Decision involves a whistleblower complaint that Elaine M. Blakely filed under the Department of Energy's (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. From 1986 to April 2002, Ms. Blakely was employed at the DOE's Fernald, Ohio site, most recently by Fluor Fernald, Inc. (FFI). Ms. Blakely alleges that FFI management retaliated against her for activity protected under the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. I. Background A. The DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program The DOE's Contractor Employee Protection Program was established to safeguard "public and employee

448

National Spent Fuel Program Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

define the means to implement the requirements defined in the Level I documents. Implementation is defined through program, strategic, and QA plans; schedules; and procedures...

449

Fermilab | Directorate | Fermilab Directorate Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fermilab Directorate Documents Red-Bulleted Items are Restricted to Fermilab Green-Bulleted Items are Unrestricted Final Report of Injury Reduction Plan 2006 Contract No....

450

Compliance Documents | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Reactor during decommissioning. Compliance and other legal documents illustrate and help support the development of effective compliance approaches and strategies, and can...

451

Document Imaging | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

than manual searches. Electronic files can be stored on file servers and posted on web servers giving broader access to information than paper documents. Office space can be...

452

Emergency Doses (ED) - Revision 3: A calculator code for environmental dose computations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The calculator program ED (Emergency Doses) was developed from several HP-41CV calculator programs documented in the report Seven Health Physics Calculator Programs for the HP-41CV, RHO-HS-ST-5P (Rittman 1984). The program was developed to enable estimates of offsite impacts more rapidly and reliably than was possible with the software available for emergency response at that time. The ED - Revision 3, documented in this report, revises the inhalation dose model to match that of ICRP 30, and adds the simple estimates for air concentration downwind from a chemical release. In addition, the method for calculating the Pasquill dispersion parameters was revised to match the GENII code within the limitations of a hand-held calculator (e.g., plume rise and building wake effects are not included). The summary report generator for printed output, which had been present in the code from the original version, was eliminated in Revision 3 to make room for the dispersion model, the chemical release portion, and the methods of looping back to an input menu until there is no further no change. This program runs on the Hewlett-Packard programmable calculators known as the HP-41CV and the HP-41CX. The documentation for ED - Revision 3 includes a guide for users, sample problems, detailed verification tests and results, model descriptions, code description (with program listing), and independent peer review. This software is intended to be used by individuals with some training in the use of air transport models. There are some user inputs that require intelligent application of the model to the actual conditions of the accident. The results calculated using ED - Revision 3 are only correct to the extent allowed by the mathematical models. 9 refs., 36 tabs.

Rittmann, P.D.

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Services Initiatives | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Services Services Initiatives Services Initiatives The Transportation Team Uses Alternative Fueled Vehicles in HQ Fleet 73% of HQ Fleet is alternative fueled (FY2011). HQ utilizes biodiesel (B20) fueled shuttle buses, a domestic renewable fuel derived from natural oils like soybean oil. Recycled Paper for Copiers and Printers DOE Headquarters purchases a combination of 30% and 100% post-consumer recycled content paper for use in its staffed copy centers, walk-up copiers, and dedicated office printers and copiers. Printing Procurement All documents procured for printing use soy ink instead of petroleum based ink, and use recycled paper. Soy ink is renewable and is very low in Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) which evaporate little and cause no air pollution, whereas

454

Title, Location, Document Number Estimated Cost Description  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Moody to Lev, SUBJECT: NEPA 2012 APS for DOE-SRS, Dated: JAN 25 2012 Moody to Lev, SUBJECT: NEPA 2012 APS for DOE-SRS, Dated: JAN 25 2012 Title, Location, Document Number Estimated Cost Description EA Determination Date: uncertain Transmittal to State: uncertain EA Approval: uncertain FONSI: uncertain EA Determination Date: uncertain Transmittal to State: uncertain EA Approval: uncertain FONSI: uncertain Total Estimated Cost $65,000 Annual NEPA Planning Summary NEPA Reviews of Proposals to Implement Enterprise SRS Initiatives unknown The Savannah River Site Strategic Plan for 2011 - 2015 describes 12 initiatives that Enterprise SRS will pursue by applying SRS's management core competencies in nuclear materials. Implementation of new missions resulting from this effort will likely require NEPA review. However, until firm proposals are developed

455

ENDF-201, ENDF/B-VI summary documentation supplement 1, ENDF/HE-VI summary documentation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC) provides coordination for and serves as the secretariat to the Cross Section Evaluation Working Group (CSWEG). CSEWG is responsible for the oversight of the ENDF/B Evaluated Nuclear Data File. All data are checked and reviewed by CSEWG, and the file is maintained at the NNDC. For a description of the ENDF/B-VI file, see the ENDF-102 Data Formats and Procedures for the Evaluated Nuclear Data File ENDF-6. The purpose of this addendum to the ENDF/B-VI Summary Documentation is to provide documentation of Releases 1, 2, 3, and 4 for the ENDF/B-VI and ENDF/HE-VI evaluated nuclear data libraries. These releases contain many new and revised evaluations for the neutron, photo-atomic interaction, radioactive decay data, spontaneous fission product yield, neutron-induced fission product yield, thermal neutron scattering, proton, deuteron, and triton sublibraries. The summaries have been extracted mainly from the ENDF/B-VI File 1 comments (MT = 451), which have been checked, edited, and may also include supplementary information. Some summaries have been provided by the evaluators in electronic format, while others are extracted from reports on the evaluations. All references have been checked and corrected, or updated where appropriate. A list of the laboratories which have contributed evaluations used in ENDF/B-VI is given.

McLane, V.

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

Acquisition Letter 2015-02- Revision of DOE O 350.1 and Special H Clause  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Acquisition Letter 2015-02 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause The purpose of Acquisition Letter (AL) 2015-02 is to communicate the revisions to Chapter VII, Risk Management and Insurance Programs of DOE Order 350.1, Contractor Human Resource Management Programs (approved on September 30, 2014), and require Contracting Officers to modify applicable contracts no later than January 31, 2015, to include the new STRIPES Special H clause which contains requirements formerly included in the Contractor Requirements Document (CRD) of Chapter VII.

457

ADMF-016 Approved Vendor List 09_0903 EOTA - Business Form Document Title:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Approved Vendor List 09_0903 6 Approved Vendor List 09_0903 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Approved Vendor List (AVL) Document Number: ADMF-016 Rev. 09_0903 Document Owner: Approvers: Elizabeth Sousa Melissa Otero Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Referenced Documents: N/A Parent Document: Notify of Changes: ADMP-002 ADM,MGT 08_1118 Moved vendor to Do Not Use list. 09_0219 Updated vendors per VRT meeting. Moved another vendor to Do Not Use list. Revision History: Rev. Description of Change 08_1110 Intitial Release. ** Note: All Blanket Puchase Authorization Memos will be maintained on file in EOTA Suite 203 office 2. 09_0301 Added additional column to Vendors FY07-09 tab. Column indicates issuance of a Blanket Puchase Authorization Memo for regularly used vendors. Column will indicate that a Blanket Puchase Authorization Memo is on File. ** Cost (Rate/Hr) column removed from FY04-06 tab.

458

RPP Environmental Permits and Related Documentation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains the current list of environmental permits and related documentation for TWRS facilities and activities.

DEXTER, M.L.

2000-11-29T23:59:59.000Z

459

SRS ecology: Environmental information document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this Document is to provide a source of ecological information based on the exiting knowledge gained from research conducted at the Savannah River Site. This document provides a summary and synthesis of ecological research in the three main ecosystem types found at SRS and information on the threatened and endangered species residing there.

Wike, L.D.; Shipley, R.W.; Bowers, J.A. [and others

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

460

WP-07 IP Direct Testimony (wp07/initial)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Initial Proposal Direct Testimony documents were provided to rate case parties on CD-ROM at the Prehearing Conference and filed with the hearing clerk via the Rate Case Parties...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Transuranic waste baseline inventory report. Revision No. 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Transuranic Waste Baseline Inventory Report (TWBIR) establishes a methodology for grouping wastes of similar physical and chemical properties from across the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) transuranic (TRU) waste system into a series of {open_quotes}waste profiles{close_quotes} that can be used as the basis for waste form discussions with regulatory agencies. The purpose of Revisions 0 and 1 of this report was to provide data to be included in the Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM) performance assessment (PA) processes for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Revision 2 of the document expanded the original purpose and was also intended to support the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) requirement for providing the total DOE TRU waste inventory. The document included a chapter and an appendix that discussed the total DOE TRU waste inventory, including nondefense, commercial, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB)-contaminated, and buried (predominately pre-1970) TRU wastes that are not planned to be disposed of at WIPP.

NONE

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

Hanford facility dangerous waste permit application, general information portion. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

For purposes of the Hanford facility dangerous waste permit application, the US Department of Energy`s contractors are identified as ``co-operators`` and sign in that capacity (refer to Condition I.A.2. of the Dangerous Waste Portion of the Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit). Any identification of these contractors as an ``operator`` elsewhere in the application is not meant to conflict with the contractors` designation as co-operators but rather is based on the contractors` contractual status with the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office. The Dangerous Waste Portion of the initial Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit, which incorporated five treatment, storage, and/or disposal units, was based on information submitted in the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application and in closure plan and closure/postclosure plan documentation. During 1995, the Dangerous Waste Portion was modified twice to incorporate another eight treatment, storage, and/or disposal units; during 1996, the Dangerous Waste Portion was modified once to incorporate another five treatment, storage, and/or disposal units. The permit modification process will be used at least annually to incorporate additional treatment, storage, and/or disposal units as permitting documentation for these units is finalized. The units to be included in annual modifications are specified in a schedule contained in the Dangerous Waste Portion of the Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit. Treatment, storage, and/or disposal units will remain in interim status until incorporated into the Permit. The Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application is considered to be a single application organized into a General Information Portion (this document, DOE/RL-91-28) and a Unit-Specific Portion. The scope of the Unit-Specific Portion is limited to individual operating treatment, storage, and/or disposal units for which Part B permit application documentation has been, or is anticipated to be, submitted. Documentation for treatment, storage, and/or disposal units undergoing closure, or for units that are, or are anticipated to be, dispositioned through other options, will continue to be submitted by the Permittees in accordance with the provisions of the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. However, the scope of the General Information Portion includes information that could be used to discuss operating units, units undergoing closure, or units being dispositioned through other options. Both the General Information and Unit-Specific portions of the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application address the contents of the Part B permit application guidance documentation prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, with additional information needs defined by revisions of Washington Administrative Code 173-303 and by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments. Documentation contained in the General Information Portion is broader in nature and could be used by multiple treatment, storage, and/or disposal units (i.e., either operating units, units undergoing closure, or units being dispositioned through other options).

Sonnichsen, J.C.

1997-08-21T23:59:59.000Z

463

RPP-RPT-42583 Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

RPP-RPT-42583 RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations C. S. Henderson T. C. Mackey Washington River Protection Solutions Date Published October 2009 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 ~. washington river ~ protectionso/utions P.O. Box 850 Richland, Washington Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited TRADEMARK

464

Partnering with Utilities and Other Program Administrators to Sustain-Grow Your Energy Efficiency Initiatives  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document contains the transcript for the Partnering with Utilities and Other Program Administrators to Sustain and Grow Your Energy Efficiency Initiatives webinar held on May 8, 2013.

465

BOARD OF GOVERNORS DOCUMENT 2013-5-08A  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 BOARD OF GOVERNORS DOCUMENT 2013-5-08A ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY POLICY 1. PREAMBLE Bishop of indicators set out to track progress and achievements in the area of sustainability. These indicators provide a quantitative, measurable basis for tracking the progress of initiatives on campus, and they allow members

466

IEC documents | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

IEC documents IEC documents IEC documents The U.S. Department of Energy has longstanding cooperative arrangements with foreign governments and international organizations in all areas of its mission - energy supply and security, science and technology, non-proliferation, and the environment, including promoting clean energy technologies to address climate change. The Department has over one hundred active commitments with 70-plus countries and 11 international organizations. Through this site, you can search and access the Department's library of active and historic (expired) commitments. Country or International Organization Algeria Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Canada CERN Chile China Colombia Costa Rica CSLF

467

Implementation of Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on July 27, 2001 approved Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report (SAR) and the associated TRUPACT-II Authorized Methods for Payload Control (TRAMPAC). Key initiatives in Revision 19 included matrix depletion, unlimited mixing of shipping categories, a flammability assessment methodology, and an alternative methodology for the determination of flammable gas generation rates. All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites shipping transuranic (TRU) waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) were required to implement Revision 19 methodology into their characterization and waste transportation programs by May 20, 2002. An implementation process was demonstrated by the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) in Golden, Colorado. The three-part process used by RFETS included revision of the site-specific TRAMPAC, an evaluation of the contact-handled TRU waste inventory against the regulations in Revision 19, and design and development of software to facilitate future inventory analyses.

D'Amico, E.; O'Leary, J.; Bell, S.; Djordjevic, S.; Givens, C,; Shokes, T.; Thompson, S.; Stahl, S.

2003-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

468

Babel 1.0 Release Criteria: A Working Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In keeping with the Open Source tradition, we want our Babel 1.0 release to indicate a certain level of capability, maturity, and stability. From our first release (version 0.5.0) in July of 2001 to our current (18th) release (version 0.9.6) we have continued to add capabilities in response to customer feedback, our observations in the field, and a consistent vision for interoperability. The key to our maturity is without a doubt the ever-increasing demands of our growing user base... both in terms of sheer size and sophistication with the underlying technology. Stability is a special challenge for any research project. With our 1.0 release, we will branch and maintain a stable Babel 1.0 code line for at least a full year. This means no new features and no backward incompatible changes, only bug fixes. All continuing R&D will be performed on a separate development tree. Currently, Babel has a quarterly release cycle with no guarantee for backward compatibility from one release to the next (though we certainly try to make migration as painless as possible). Now is the time where we can see a good point for a Babel 1.0 release. But, seeing that point is different from being there. This list enumerates and explains the outstanding technical issues to be resolved to minimize volatility and help ensure stability for the 1.0 line. The first draft of this document was circulated internally in June 2003. A revised draft was then presented at the July 2003 CCA meeting. A third revision was made into the current working document form & circulated for general comment on the babel-users mailing list and Babel's homepage. The working document was intended to be an open record tracking progress in subsequent Babel releases. A major revision of the document (including adding new items and promoting/demoting items) was done in October 2004, well after the 0.9.6 release.

Kumfert, G; Dahlgren, T; Epperly, T; Leek, J

2004-10-19T23:59:59.000Z

469

Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Robert M. Myers, Director, Contractor Human Resources Policy Division (MA-612) at (202) 287-1584 or robert.myers@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash - DOE O 350 1.pdf Consolidated Model H-Clause 06-27-13.pdf Acquisition Letter - DOE O 350 1 6-27-13.pdf More Documents & Publications GAO-04-539 Department of Energy: Certain Postretirement Benefits for Contractor Employees Are Unfunded and Program Oversight Could Be Improved Chapter 30 - Cost Accounting Standards Administration

470

Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department 2 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Robert M. Myers, Director, Contractor Human Resources Policy Division (MA-612) at (202) 287-1584 or robert.myers@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash - DOE O 350 1.pdf Consolidated Model H-Clause 06-27-13.pdf Acquisition Letter - DOE O 350 1 6-27-13.pdf More Documents & Publications Chapter 30 - Cost Accounting Standards Administration OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides GAO-04-539 Department of Energy: Certain Postretirement Benefits for Contractor Employees Are Unfunded and Program Oversight Could Be Improved

471

Document Library | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Services » Document Library Services » Document Library Document Library January 1, 2014 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Scorecard - January 2014 The scorecard includes news updates, regulatory status, reactor design certification, early site permits, new plant construction progress, and expected operation dates. December 4, 2013 Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) This report documents the first phase of a multi-year project to understand the technical feasibility and logistical implications of direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel in existing dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) and other types of storage casks. November 26, 2013 MEETING MATERIALS: DECEMBER 19, 2013 Washington Marriott at Metro Center Ballroom A 775 12th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 October 31, 2013

472

EVALUATION FORM (Internal Libraries Document)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EVALUATION FORM (Internal Libraries Document) FACULTY MEMBER COMPLETES TOP Date: Rank/Title: Name, Research and Service, respectively for tenure track; 70%-10%-20% for non-tenure track) has been in effect

Stowell, Michael

473

Document Library | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Document Library Services » Document Library Document Library January 1, 2014 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Scorecard - January 2014 The scorecard includes news updates, regulatory status, reactor design certification, early site permits, new plant construction progress, and expected operation dates. December 4, 2013 Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) This report documents the first phase of a multi-year project to understand the technical feasibility and logistical implications of direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel in existing dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) and other types of storage casks. November 26, 2013 MEETING MATERIALS: DECEMBER 19, 2013 Washington Marriott at Metro Center Ballroom A 775 12th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 October 31, 2013

474

Latest revised date: October 26, 2011 Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety S-009  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Latest revised date: October 26, 2011 Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety S-009 Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety S-009 Printed Copies of this Document with the Department of Health & Safety) the type of hand protection required for the specific hand hazard; Provide

deYoung, Brad

475

Light Water Reactor Sustainability Technical Documents | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Initiatives » Nuclear Reactor Technologies » Light Water Reactor Initiatives » Nuclear Reactor Technologies » Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program » Light Water Reactor Sustainability Technical Documents Light Water Reactor Sustainability Technical Documents September 30, 2011 Reactor Pressure Vessel Task of Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program: Initial Assessment of Thermal Annealing Needs and Challenges The most life-limiting structural component in light-water reactors (LWR) is the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) because replacement of the RPV is not considered a viable option at this time. LWR licenses are now being extended from 40y to 60y by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) with intentions to extend licenses to 80y and beyond. The RPV materials exhibit varying degrees of sensitivity to irradiation-induced embrittlement

476

Accelerated_Program_Application_10_31.doc | Revised: 11/4/13 Accelerated Program Application  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Accelerated_Program_Application_10_31.doc | Revised: 11/4/13 Accelerated Program Application OFFICE://www.grad.usf.edu/ STUDENT AGREEMENT Please initial, indicating agreement: I have reviewed the Accelerated Program Requirements and information (http://www.grad.usf.edu/accelerated.php) I have met with my undergraduate

Meyers, Steven D.

477

Monitoring well plugging and abandonment plan, Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (revised)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Plugging and abandonment (P&A) of defunct groundwater monitoring wells is a primary element of the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Groundwater Protection Program (GWPP) (AJA Technical Services, Inc. 1996). This document is the revised groundwater monitoring well P&A plan for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Y-12 Plant located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This plan describes the systematic approach employed by Y-12 Plant GWPP to identify wells that require P&A, the technical methods employed to perform P&A activities, and administrative requirements. Original documentation for Y-12 Plant GWPP groundwater monitoring well P&A was provided in HSW, Inc. (1991). The original revision of the plan specified that a comprehensive monitoring well P&A was provided in HSW, Inc. (1991). The original revision of the plan specified that a comprehensive monitoring well P&A schedule be maintained. Wells are added to this list by issuance of both a P&A request and a P&A addendum to the schedule. The current Updated Subsurface Data Base includes a single mechanism to track the status of monitoring wells. In addition, rapid growth of the groundwater monitoring network and new regulatory requirements have resulted in constant changes to the status of wells. As a result, a streamlined mechanism to identify and track monitoring wells scheduled for P&A has been developed and the plan revised to formalize the new business practices.

NONE

1997-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

478

Document Engineering in User Experience Design  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-founded another company: Document Engineering Services #12;What Is Document Engineering? A methodologyDocument Engineering in User Experience Design Doctrain Vancouver -- 8 May 2008 Bob Glushko? What is document engineering? The need to bridge the "front stage" and "back stage" Document

Glushko, Robert J.

479

Document Filtering With Inference Networks Jamie Callan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Document Filtering With Inference Networks Jamie Callan Computer Science Department University document filtering. The prob­ lems of document retrieval and document filtering are sim­ ilar of the infor­ mation available, are all different. This paper describes a new statistical document filtering

Callan, Jamie

480

A Documentation Consortium Ted Habermann, NOAA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A Documentation Consortium Ted Habermann, NOAA Documentation: It's not just discovery... 50% change this settles the issue.. #12;New Documentation Needs For skeptics, the 1,000 or so e-mails and documents hacked Communities - Users Documentation: communicating with the future #12;Geoffrey Moore has attributed the S

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "document initiation revised" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Document Filtering With Inference Networks Jamie Callan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Document Filtering With Inference Networks Jamie Callan Computer Science Department University document ltering. The prob- lems of document retrieval and document ltering are sim- ilar at an abstract- mation available, are all di erent. This paper describes a new statistical document ltering system called

Callan, Jamie

482

Paper Augmented Digital Documents Franois Guimbretire  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Paper Augmented Digital Documents Fran�ois Guimbreti�re Department of Computer Science Human Digital Documents (PADD), are digital documents that can be manipulated either on a computer screen and the paper worlds. As digital documents, PADD are easy to edit, distribute and archive; as paper documents

Golbeck, Jennifer

483

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Part B Permit Application [for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)]. Volume 5, Chapter D, Appendix D1 (conclusion), Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The reference design for the underground facilities at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant was developed using the best criteria available at initiation of the detailed design effort. These design criteria are contained in the US Department of Energy document titled Design Criteria, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Revised Mission Concept-IIA (RMC-IIA), Rev. 4, dated February 1984. The validation process described in the Design Validation Final Report has resulted in validation of the reference design of the underground openings based on these criteria. Future changes may necessitate modification of the Design Criteria document and/or the reference design. Validation of the reference design as presented in this report permits the consideration of future design or design criteria modifications necessitated by these changes or by experience gained at the WIPP. Any future modifications to the design criteria and/or the reference design will be governed by a DOE Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) covering underground design changes. This procedure will explain the process to be followed in describing, evaluating and approving the change.

Not Available

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

484

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative: GHG Emissions from Stationary  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative: GHG Emissions from Stationary The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative: GHG Emissions from Stationary Combustion Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative: GHG Emissions from Stationary Combustion Agency/Company /Organization: World Resources Institute, World Business Council for Sustainable Development Sector: Energy, Climate Focus Area: Buildings, Greenhouse Gas Phase: Determine Baseline, Evaluate Effectiveness and Revise as Needed Resource Type: Software/modeling tools User Interface: Spreadsheet Website: www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools Cost: Free References: Stationary Combustion Guidance[1] The Greenhouse Gas Protocol tool for stationary combustion is a free Excel spreadsheet calculator designed to calculate GHG emissions specifically

485

Topic initiator detection on the world wide web  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In this paper we introduce a new Web mining and search technique - Topic Initiator Detection (TID) on the Web. Given a topic query on the Internet and the resulting collection of time-stamped web documents which contain the query keywords, the task of ... Keywords: information retrieval, ranking, topic initiator, web mining

Xin Jin; Scott Spangler; Rui Ma; Jiawei Han

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

TWRS privatization bibliography. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this bibliography is to present a select set of documents that may be of interest to the Offeror, covering a variety of subject areas related to the TWRS Privatization Project. This bibliography is not, nor is it intended to be, exhaustive or complete. It was prepared with the intent of providing a sampling of representative documents potentially helpful to Offerors. This bibliography is organized by subject area. The subjects covered are: waste characterization; pre-treatment; high-level waste immobilization; low-level waste immobilization; low-level waste melter test program; performance assessment; general; and safety.

NONE

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

487

Safety Evaluation Report of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Contact Handled (CH) Waste Documented Safety Analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Safety Evaluation Report (SER) documents the Department of Energys (DOE's) review of Revision 9 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Contact Handled (CH) Waste Documented Safety Analysis, DOE/WIPP-95-2065 (WIPP CH DSA), and provides the DOE Approval Authority with the basis for approving the document. It concludes that the safety basis documented in the WIPP CH DSA is comprehensive, correct, and commensurate with hazards associated with CH waste disposal operations. The WIPP CH DSA and associated technical safety requirements (TSRs) were developed in accordance with 10 CFR 830, Nuclear Safety Management, and DOE-STD-3009-94, Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

488

SunShot Initiative  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The SunShot Initiative homepage. The DOE SunShot Initiative is a national collaborative effort to make solar energy cost-competitive with other forms of electricity by the end of the decade.

489

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative: Sector Specific Tools | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Gas Protocol Initiative: Sector Specific Tools Gas Protocol Initiative: Sector Specific Tools Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative: Sector Specific Tools Agency/Company /Organization: World Resources Institute, World Business Council for Sustainable Development Sector: Energy, Climate Focus Area: Industry, Greenhouse Gas Phase: Determine Baseline, Evaluate Effectiveness and Revise as Needed Resource Type: Software/modeling tools User Interface: Spreadsheet Website: www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools Cost: Free References: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative: GHG Emissions from Purchased Electricity[1] The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative: GHG Emissions from Stationary Combustion[2] The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative: GHG Emissions from Transport or Mobil Sources[3]

490

Engineering Basis Document Review Supporting the Double Shell Tank (DST) System Specification Development  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Double-Shell Tank (DST) System is required to transition from its current storage mission to a storage and retrieval mission supporting the River Protection Project Phase 1 privatization, defined in HNF-SD-WM-MAR-008, Tank Waste Remediation System Mission Analysis Report. Requirements for the DST subsystems are being developed using the top-down systems engineering process outlined in HNF-SD-WM-SEMP-002, Tank Waste Remediation System Systems Engineering Management Plan. This top-down process considers existing designs to the extent that these designs impose unavoidable constraints on the Phase 1 mission. Existing engineering-basis documents were screened, and the unavoidable constraints were identified. The constraints identified herein will be added to the DST System specification (HNF-SD-WM-TRD-007, System Specification for the Double-Shell Tank System). While the letter revisions of the DST System specification were constructed with a less rigorous review of the existing engineering-basis documents, the Revision 0 release of the specification must incorporate the results of the review documented herein. The purpose of this document is to describe the screening process and criteria used to determine which constraints are unavoidable and to document the screening results.

LEONARD, M.W.

2000-03-14T23:59:59.000Z

491

2008: Revised Research Plan - An update to the 2003 Strategic Plan  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8: Revised Research Plan - An update to the 2003 Strategic Plan Print E-mail 8: Revised Research Plan - An update to the 2003 Strategic Plan Print E-mail The Revised Research Plan is an update to the 2003 Strategic Plan of the US Climate Change Science Program (CCSP), a document that was developed via a thorough, open and transparent multi-year process involving a wide range of scientists and managers. The Strategic Plan has long-term value to CCSP, but like any strategic plan, it must be supplemented by shorter-term revisions that take into account both advances in the science and changes in societal needs, and CCSP has an ongoing long-range strategic planning process to ensure that these needs are met. The Revised Research Plan (hereinafter referred to as the Research Plan) draws on CCSP's long-range planning process and provides this update, in compliance with the terms of the Global Change Research Act (GCRA) of 1990.

492

Proposed site treatment plan (PSTP) Volumes I & II & reference document, Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Federal Facility Compliance Act requires the Department of Energy to undertake a national effort to develop Site Treatment Plans for each of its sites generating or storing mixed waste. Mixed waste contains both a hazardous waste subject to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and radioactive material subject to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. The Site Treatment Plan for the Savannah River Site proposes how SRS will treat mixed waste that is now stored on the site and mixed waste that Will be generated in the future. Also, the Site Treatment Plan identifies Savannah River Site mixed wastes that other Department of Energy facilities could treat and mixed waste from other facilities that the Savannah River Site could treat. The Site Treatment Plan has been approved by the State of South Carolina. The Department of Energy Will enter into a consent order with the State of South Carolina by October 6, 1995. The consent order will contain enforceable commitments to treat mixed waste.

Helmich, E.; Noller, D.K.; Wierzbicki, K.S. [and others

1995-09-27T23:59:59.000Z

493

Fiscal Year 2016 Budget and 2015 Revisions, document 2014-06  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

that benefit fish and wildlife in the mainstem, tributaries, and estuary Continue the work to reform artificial

494

Revised Master Plan for the Hood River Production Program, Technical Report 2008.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Hood River Production Program (HRPP) is a Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) funded program initiated as a mitigation measure for Columbia River hydrosystem effects on anadromous fish. The HRPP began in the early 1990s with the release of spring Chinook and winter steelhead smolts into the basin. Prior to implementation, co-managers, including the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife drafted the Hood River Production Master Plan (O'Toole and ODFW 1991a; O'Toole and ODFW 1991b) and the Pelton Ladder Master Plan (Smith and CTWSR 1991). Both documents were completed in 1991 and subsequently approved by the Council in 1992 and authorized through a BPA-led Environmental Impact Statement in 1996. In 2003, a 10-year programmatic review was conducted for BPA-funded programs in the Hood River (Underwood et al. 2003). The primary objective of the HRPP Review (Review) was to determine if program goals were being met, and if modifications to program activities would be necessary in order to meet or revise program goals. In 2003, an agreement was signed between PacifiCorp and resource managers to remove the Powerdale Dam (RM 10) and associated adult trapping facility by 2010. The HRPP program has been dependant on the adult trap to collect broodstock for the hatchery programs; therefore, upon the dam's removal, some sort of replacement for the trap would be needed to continue the HRPP. At the same time the Hood River Subbasin Plan (Coccoli 2004) was being written and prompted the co-managers to considered future direction of the program. This included revising the numerical adult fish objectives based on the assimilated data and output from several models run on the Hood River system. In response to the Review as well as the Subbasin Plan, and intensive monitoring and evaluation of the current program, the HRPP co-managers determined the spring Chinook program was not achieving the HRPP's defined smolt-to-adult (SAR) survival rate guidelines. The observed low SAR was due to precocity, straying, and incidence of BKD in the spring Chinook program; which ultimately led to the program's inability to achieve the subbasin's overly optimistic biological fish objectives. The summer steelhead hatchery program was not providing the fishery or population benefits anticipated and will be discontinued. The winter steelhead program was performing as planned and no changes are foreseen. This updated Master Plan addresses the several proposed changes to the existing HRPP, which are described.

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation

2008-04-28T23:59:59.000Z

495

TREM -accede_document.php http://cemadoc.irstea.fr/exl-php/util/documents/accede_document.php 1 sur 4 02/01/2014 11:13  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

TREM - accede_document.php http://cemadoc.irstea.fr/exl-php/util/documents/accede_document.php 1 - accede_document.php http://cemadoc.irstea.fr/exl-php/util/documents/accede_document.php 2 sur 4 02;TREM - accede_document.php http://cemadoc.irstea.fr/exl-php/util/documents/accede_document.php 3 sur 4

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

496

accede_document.php http://cemadoc.irstea.fr/exl-php/util/documents/accede_document.php 1 sur 29 27/01/2014 16:17  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

accede_document.php http://cemadoc.irstea.fr/exl-php/util/documents/accede_document.php 1 sur 29 27;accede_document.php http://cemadoc.irstea.fr/exl-php/util/documents/accede_document.php 2 sur 29 27;accede_document.php http://cemadoc.irstea.fr/exl-php/util/documents/accede_document.php 3 sur 29 27

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

497

Oversight Documents | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26, 2013 26, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Tank Farms - April 2013 Review of Management of Safety Systems at the Hanford Tank Farms April 25, 2013 CRAD, Documented Safety Analysis Development - April 23, 2013 Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (LBL Facilities) (HSS CRAD 45-58, Rev. 0) April 23, 2013 Independent Activity Report, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2013 Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report [HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08] April 22, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - April 2013 Review of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Work Planning and Control

498

Other Documents | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Documents Documents Other Documents October 30, 2013 EIS-0283-S2: Amended Interim Action Determination Disposition of Certain Plutonium Materials at the K-Area Complex, Savannah River Site April 25, 2013 EIS-0283-S2: Interim Action Determination Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (K-Area Materials Storage (KAMS) Area Expansion at the Savannah River Site) January 28, 2013 EIS-0225-SA-05: Supplement Analysis Determination Continued Operation of the Pantex Plant and Associated Storage of Nuclear Weapon Components December 31, 2012 EIS-0470: EPA Notice of Adoption of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Cape Wind Energy Project in Nantucket Sound, Massachusetts June 26, 2012 EIS-0283-S2: Interim Action Determination Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

499

sqas wi9 final document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SQAS96-001 SQAS96-001 Quality Report SQAS96-001 Preparation for a Software Quality Audit June 1996 Software Quality Assurance Subcommittee of the Nuclear Weapons Complex Quality Managers United States Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office Abstract This document will enable a site to prepare for a software quality audit by providing specific guidance. It will also provide guidance to a site that would enable it to perform a software quality audit. Preparation for a Software Quality Audit SQAS96-001 ACKNOWLEDGMENT This document was prepared for the Department of Energy (DOE) by a Working Group of the Nuclear Weapons Complex (NWC) Quality Managers' Software Quality Assurance Subcommittee (SQAS). The following contributed towards the creation of this document:

500

Document Library | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Document Library Services » Document Library Document Library May 1, 2001 Meeting Materials: March 30-31, 1999 NEAC Meeting Crystal City Marriott Arlington, Virginia May 1, 2001 Meeting Materials: April 30 - May 1, 2001 NEAC Meeting Crystal City Marriott Arlington, Virginia April 30, 2001 University Research Reactor Task Force to the Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee In mid-February, 2001 The University Research Reactor (URR) Task Force (TF), a sub-group of the Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee (NERAC), was asked to: * Analyze information collected by DOE, the NERAC "Blue Ribbon Panel," universities, and other sources pertaining to university reactors including their research and training capabilities, costs to operate, and