National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for document initiation revised

  1. Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents, May 2009 (Revised) (Book)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    www.femp.energy.gov ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program Revised June 2013 DOE/GO-102009-2588 UESCs: Enabling Documents 1 Department of Energy Washington, D.C. Dear Colleagues, The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is pleased to present this third

  2. Document Information Document # FOIA-2009-0054 Revision Title FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Section 1 Document Information Document # FOIA-2009-0054 Revision Title FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 2009-0054) Date 09/02/2009 Originator RIEHLE DC Originator Co. O)OE-RL Recipient JAR VIS R Recipient Co. HEART OF ___ ___ __ ___ __ __ ___ __AMERICA NW References Keywords OCE, FOIA, SENSITIVE, PRIVATE CITIZEN Projects ___________________________ Other Information__________________________ Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 September

  3. Guidance document for revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kudera, D.E.; McMurtrey, C.D.; Meagher, B.G.

    1993-04-01

    This document provides guidance for the revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, ``Radioactive Waste Management.`` Technical Working Groups have been established and are responsible for writing the revised order. The Technical Working Groups will use this document as a reference for polices and procedures that have been established for the revision process. The overall intent of this guidance is to outline how the order will be revised and how the revision process will be managed. In addition, this document outlines technical issues considered for inclusion by a Department of Energy Steering Committee.

  4. Acronyms, initialisms, and abbreviations: Fourth Revision

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Tolman, B.J.

    1994-04-01

    This document lists acronyms used in technical writing. The immense list is supplemented by an appendix containing chemical elements, classified information access, common abbreviations used for functions, conversion factors for selected SI units, a flowcharting template, greek alphabet, metrix terminology, proofreader`s marks, signs and symbols, and state abbreviations.

  5. Idaho National Engineering Laboratory installation roadmap document. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-05-30

    The roadmapping process was initiated by the US Department of Energy`s office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) to improve its Five-Year Plan and budget allocation process. Roadmap documents will provide the technical baseline for this planning process and help EM develop more effective strategies and program plans for achieving its long-term goals. This document is a composite of roadmap assumptions and issues developed for the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) by US Department of Energy Idaho Field Office and subcontractor personnel. The installation roadmap discusses activities, issues, and installation commitments that affect waste management and environmental restoration activities at the INEL. The High-Level Waste, Land Disposal Restriction, and Environmental Restoration Roadmaps are also included.

  6. WP-07 IP Studies & Documentation (wp07/initial)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Initial Proposal Studies and Documentation were provided to rate case parties on CD-ROM at the Prehearing Conference and filed with the hearing clerk via the Rate Case Parties...

  7. Solar Power Tower Design Basis Document, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    ZAVOICO,ALEXIS B.

    2001-07-01

    This report contains the design basis for a generic molten-salt solar power tower. A solar power tower uses a field of tracking mirrors (heliostats) that redirect sunlight on to a centrally located receiver mounted on top a tower, which absorbs the concentrated sunlight. Molten nitrate salt, pumped from a tank at ground level, absorbs the sunlight, heating it up to 565 C. The heated salt flows back to ground level into another tank where it is stored, then pumped through a steam generator to produce steam and make electricity. This report establishes a set of criteria upon which the next generation of solar power towers will be designed. The report contains detailed criteria for each of the major systems: Collector System, Receiver System, Thermal Storage System, Steam Generator System, Master Control System, and Electric Heat Tracing System. The Electric Power Generation System and Balance of Plant discussions are limited to interface requirements. This design basis builds on the extensive experience gained from the Solar Two project and includes potential design innovations that will improve reliability and lower technical risk. This design basis document is a living document and contains several areas that require trade-studies and design analysis to fully complete the design basis. Project- and site-specific conditions and requirements will also resolve open To Be Determined issues.

  8. UMTRA Surface Project management action process document: Final. Revision 2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-06-01

    Title 1 of the UMTRCA authorized the DOE to undertake remedial actions at these designed sites and associated vicinity properties (VP), which contain uranium mill tailings and other residual radioactive materials (RRM) derived from the processing sites. Title 2 of the UMTRCA addresses uranium mill sites that were licensed at the time the UMTRCA was enacted. Cleanup of these Title 2 sites is the responsibility of the licensees. The cleanup of the Title 1 sites has been split into two separate projects: the Surface Project, which deals with the mill buildings, tailings, and contaminated soils at the sites and VPs; and the Ground Water Project, which is limited to the contaminated ground water at the sites. This management action process (MAP) document discusses the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Surface Project. Since its inception through March 1996, the Surface Project (hereinafter called the Project) has cleaned up 16 of the 24 designated processing sites and approximately 5,000 VPs, reducing the risk to human health and the environment posed by the uranium mill tailings. Two of the 24 sites, Belfield and Bowman, North Dakota, will not be remediated at the request of the state, reducing the total number of sites to 22. By the start of FY1998, the remaining 6 processing sites and associated VPs will be cleaned up. The remedial action activities to be funded in FY1998 by the FY1998 budget request are remediation of the remaining Grand Junction, Colorado, VPs; closure of the Cheney disposal cell in Grand Junction, Colorado; and preparation of the completion reports for 4 completed sites.

  9. Document # FOIA-2009-0054 Revision Title FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4] Document Inf ormation Document # FOIA-2009-0054 Revision Title FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 2009-0054) Date 09/02/2009 Originator RIEHLE bC Originator Co. bOE-RL Recipient JAR VI5 R Recipient Co. HEART OF __________AMERICA NW References Keywords OCE, FOTA, SENSITIVE, PRIVATE CITIZEN Projects Other Information___________________________ WHC-SD-W025-RPT-001, Rev. 0 ECN o. TDescription of Change W-025-017 If the installer elects to weld geomembrane seams in ambient temperatures below

  10. Document # FOIA-2009-0054 Revision Title FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOT

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    [ Section 2] Document Inf ormation Document # FOIA-2009-0054 Revision Title FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOT 2009-0054) Date 09/02/2009 Originator RIEHLE DC Originator Co. DOE-RL Recipient JARVIS R Recipient Co. HEART OF ________ ___________ _________AMERICA NW References Keywords OCE, FOIA, SENSITIVE, PRIVATE CITIZEN Projects Other Inf ormation___________________________ 4- O- LLJ 0)44 ' I-, 0 .t 04- 0 to 3 Wd) V 4 4- 4 0ca c.-Mt 4.)D'as 4 )t > 4-0 o 0 - 5'a-a:.-- -- = 0 ) 4 1 W >

  11. Technical support document for proposed 1994 revision of the MEC thermal envelope requirements

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

    1994-03-01

    This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the Council of American Building Officials` (CABO) 1994 supplement to the 1993 Model Energy Code (MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for maximum component U{sub 0}-value. The 1994 amendments to the 1993 MEC were established in last year`s code change cycle and did not change the envelope requirements. The research underlying the proposed MEC revision was conducted by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) for the US Department of Energy (DOE) Building Energy Standards program. The goal of this research was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determines the most cost-effective (least total cost) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) (insulation levels and window types) for residential buildings. This least-cost set of ECMs was used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U{sub 0}-values (thermal transmittances). ECMs include window types (for example, double-pane vinyl) and insulation levels (for example, R-19) for ceilings, walls, and floors.

  12. Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ankrum, A.; Nickolaus, J.; Vinther, R.; Maguire-Moffitt, N.; Hammer, J.; Sherfey, L.; Warner, R.

    1994-08-01

    As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. In addition to updating previous information, Revision 1 adds citations from the NRC Inspection Manual and the Improved Standard Technical Specifications. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Generic Letters, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

  13. IDC System Specification Document.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clifford, David J.

    2014-12-01

    This document contains the system specifications derived to satisfy the system requirements found in the IDC System Requirements Document for the IDC Reengineering Phase 2 project. Revisions Version Date Author/Team Revision Description Authorized by V1.0 12/2014 IDC Reengineering Project Team Initial delivery M. Harris

  14. Technical support document: Survey data used in revising the energy conservation requirements in the manufactured home construction and safety standards

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lee, A.D.; Conner, C.C.

    1992-02-01

    This report documents data used in the development of revised energy conservation standards for manufactured housing. The approach used in developing the proposed standard revision is a cost-benefit analysis in which the costs of energy conservation measures (ECM) are balanced against the benefits of energy savings. The analysis used to develop the recommendations for revision of the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) energy conservation standards for manufactured housing requires information on specific ECMs. This technical support document contains the data from two of the three surveys that were used primarily to characterize the available ECMs and their associated costs. The analyses of these data are provided in separate reports. 5 refs.

  15. Preliminary design requirements document for the initial single-shell tank retrieval system

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hertzel, J.S., Westinghouse Hanford

    1996-07-24

    The scope of this Preliminary Design Requirements Document is to identify and define the functions, with associated requirements, which must be performed to demonstrate and accomplish the initial single-shell tank saltcake retrieval from selected tanks. This document sets forth functions, requirements, performance requirements and design constraints necessary to begin conceptual design for the Initial Single-shell Tank Retrieval System. System and physical interfaces between the Initial Single-shell Tank Retrieval System project and the Tank Waste Remediation are identified. The constraints, performance requirements, and transfer of information and data across a technical interface will be documented in an Interface Control Document. The design requirements provided in this document will be augmented by additional detailed design to be documented by the project.

  16. Small job development software project documentation for the activity management system. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gates, T.A.; Burdick, M.B.

    1994-09-22

    This document contains all the required software development documentation as required by WHC-CM-3-10, software practices.

  17. Document

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    in its place ''Commanding General, Headquarters, U.S. Army Materiel Command, 9301 Chapek Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5527.'' 38. Section 908.7113 is revised to read as...

  18. Document

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    As provided in the rule, DOE is now issuing revised SSPs for use in an SPR drawdown. EFFECTIVE DATE: As of July 7, 2005, these SSPs are adopted for use in the price...

  19. Revisions

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    U.S. proved reserves of crude oil and lease condensate, crude oil, and lease condensate, 2004-14 million barrels Revisions a Net of Sales b New Reservoir Proved d Change Net and and New Field Discoveries Total c Estimated Reserves from Adjustments Revisions Adjustments Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Discoveries Production 12/31 Prior Year Year (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) 2004 80 444 524 37 731 36 159 926 2,001 22,592 -514 2005 237 558 795 327 946 209 57 1,212

  20. Revisions

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    proved reserves of natural gas, wet after lease separation, 2001-14 billion cubic feet Revisions a Net of Sales b New Reservoir Proved d Change Net and and New Field Discoveries Total c Estimated Reserves from Adjustments Revisions Adjustments Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Discoveries Production 12/31 Prior Year Year (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) Total natural gas (billion cubic feet) 2001 1,849 -2,438 -589 2,715 17,183 3,668 2,898 23,749 20,642 191,743 5,233

  1. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    834 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Notices public an opportunity to comment on the Guidance Memoranda prior to their approval. On May 6, 2005, a Notice of Availability was placed in the Federal Register (70 FR 24008) inviting the public to comment on the final draft of the Guidance Memoranda. As a result of public comment we received on the final draft, we have revised the Guidance Memoranda and invite the public to comment on the revised final draft. The

  2. Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Documents Recommendations For Proposed Well Locations In The Pahute Mesa Area At The Nevada Test Site Technical Summation version Stakeholder Summation version DOE Documents Environmental Management SSAB 15 Year Anniversary Paper (presented at the Waste Management Symposium, March 4, 2009)

  3. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    171 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 108 / Monday, June 7, 2010 / Notices an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Electronic Access to This Document You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/

  4. DOCUMENT RELEASE FORM C

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    RELEASE FORM C (1) Document Number: RPP-RPT-431 74 (2) Revision Number: (3) Effective Date: 9/30/2009 (4) Document Type: El Digital Image El Hard copy (a) Number of pages (including the DRF) or 107 E PDF E] Video number of digital images (5) Release Type 0 New El Cancel El Page Change El complete Revision (6) Document Title: 2009 Auto-TOR for Tank 241 -T-204 (7) Change/Release Initial Issuance Description: (8) Change Initial Issuance Justification: (9) Associated (a) Structure Location: (c)

  5. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    52 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 5 / Wednesday, January 8, 2003 / Notices Electronic Access to This Document You may view this document, as well as all other Department of Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/ legislation/FedRegister. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.

  6. Document | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Extracted Pages PDF icon Document More Documents & Publications ADR Policy Federal Register ADR Revised Policy Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc

  7. Supporting documentation for the 1997 revision to the DOE Insulation Fact Sheet

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Stovall, T.K.

    1997-08-22

    The Department of Energy (DOE) Insulation Fact Sheet has been revised to reflect developments in energy conservation technology and the insulation market. A nationwide insulation cost survey was made by polling insulation contractors and builders, and the results are reported here. These costs, along with regional weather data, regional fuel costs, and fuel-specific system efficiencies were used to produce recommended insulation levels for new and existing houses. This report contains all of the methodology, algorithms, assumptions, references, and data resources that were used to produce the 1997 DOE Insulation Fact Sheet.

  8. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    637 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 10, 2008 / Rules and Regulations PART 762-GUARANTEED FARM LOANS I 1. The authority citation for part 762 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1989. § 762.148 [Amended] I 2. Amend § 762.148(d)(1) by removing the second sentence. I 3. Amend § 762.149 by revising paragraphs (b)(1) introductory text, (b)(1)(v), (d) introductory text, (d)(2), (i)(1), and (i)(5) to read as set forth below. § 762.149 Liquidation. * *

  9. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: http:www.ed.gov newsfedregister. To use PDF you must...

  10. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. Rules and Regulations Federal Register 36661 Vol. 71, No. 124 Wednesday, June 28, 2006

  11. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DOE selected this project for an award of financial assistance through a competitive process under the Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) Program. AEP's Mountaineer Commercial ...

  12. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DOE selected this project for an award of financial assistance through a competitive process under the Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) program. The project proposed by HECA ...

  13. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    990 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/ news/fedregister. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ index.html.

  14. Acceptable knowledge document for INEEL stored transuranic waste -- Rocky Flats Plant waste. Revision 2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-01-23

    This document and supporting documentation provide a consistent, defensible, and auditable record of acceptable knowledge for waste generated at the Rocky Flats Plant which is currently in the accessible storage inventory at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. The inventory consists of transuranic (TRU) waste generated from 1972 through 1989. Regulations authorize waste generators and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities to use acceptable knowledge in appropriate circumstances to make hazardous waste determinations. Acceptable knowledge includes information relating to plant history, process operations, and waste management, in addition to waste-specific data generated prior to the effective date of the RCRA regulations. This document is organized to provide the reader a comprehensive presentation of the TRU waste inventory ranging from descriptions of the historical plant operations that generated and managed the waste to specific information about the composition of each waste group. Section 2 lists the requirements that dictate and direct TRU waste characterization and authorize the use of the acceptable knowledge approach. In addition to defining the TRU waste inventory, Section 3 summarizes the historical operations, waste management, characterization, and certification activities associated with the inventory. Sections 5.0 through 26.0 describe the waste groups in the inventory including waste generation, waste packaging, and waste characterization. This document includes an expanded discussion for each waste group of potential radionuclide contaminants, in addition to other physical properties and interferences that could potentially impact radioassay systems.

  15. Document Details Document Number

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Document Details Document Number Date of Document Document Title/Description [Links below to each document] D195066340 Not listed. N/A REVISIONS IN STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE OF COLUMBIA RIVER BASALT GROUP D196000240 Not listed. N/A EPA DENIAL OF LINER LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS D196005916 Not listed. N/A LATE CENOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY AND TECTONIC EVOLUTION WITHIN SUBSIDING BASIN SOUTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON D196025993 RHO-BWI-ST-14 N/A SUPRABASALT SEDIMENTS OF COLD CREEK SYNCLINE AREA

  16. DOCUMENT RELEASE FORM G5

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DOCUMENT RELEASE FORM G5 (1) Document Number: RPP-RPT-431 69 (2) Revision Number: 0 (3) Effective Date: 9/30/2009 (4) Document Type: E] Digital Image l Hard copy (a) Number of pages (including the IDRF) or 125 E PDF ElVideo number of digital images (5) Release Type Z New 0 Cancel El Page Change l complete Revision (6) Document Title: 2009 Auto-TCR for Tank 241 -T-1 11 (7) Change/Release Initial Issuance Description: (8) Change Initial Issuance Justification: (9) Associated (a) Structure

  17. DOCUMENT RELEASE FORM

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    7 (2) Revision Number: 0 1(3) Effective Date: 9/28/2009 (4) Document Type: [] Digital Image [] Hard copy (a) Number of pages (including the DRF) or 76 Z PDF E] Video number of digital images (5) Release Type Z New El cancel E] Page Change El complete Revision (6) Document Title: 2009 Auto-TCR for Tank 241-13-203 (7) Change/Release Initial Issuance Description: (8) Change Initial Issuance Justification: (9) Associated (a) Structure Location: (c) Building Number: Structure, System, and Component

  18. DOCUMENT RELEASE FORM

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8 (2) Revision Number: 0 (3) Effective Date: 9/28/2009 (4) Document Type: [] Digital Image El Hard copy (a) Number of pages (including the DRF) or 74 0PDF E] Video number of digital images (5) Release Type E New El cancel l Page Change El complete Revision (6) Document Title: 2009 Auto-TCR for Tank 241-13-204 (7) Change/Release Initial Issuance Description: (8) Change Initial Issuance Justification: (9) Associated (a) Structure Location: (c) Building Number: Structure, System, and Component N/A

  19. DOCUMENT RELEASE FORM

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    31 97 (2) Revision Number: 0 -- (3) Effective Date: 9/30/2009 (4) Document Type: E] Digital Image l Hard copy (a) Number of pages (including the DRF) or 84 0 POE E Video number of digital images (5) Release Type Z New 1:1 Cancel liiPage Change Elcomplete Revision (6) Document Title: 2009 Auto-TOR for Tank 241 -TY-1 05 (7) Change/Release Initial Issuance Description: (8) Change Initial Issuance Justification: (9) Associated (a) Structure Location: (c) Building Number: Structure, System, and

  20. Document

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    4 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 79 / Thursday, April 24, 2003 / Notices j. Deadline for filing comments and/ or motions: May 19, 2003. All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with: Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Please include the project number (P- 10855-005) on any comments or motions filed. k. Description of Request: Upper Peninsula Power Company (UPPCO) proposes to add additional acreage to

  1. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2011 / Notices it is recommended that documents be transmitted by overnight mail, by electronic mail to Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov, or by facsimile to 202-586-8008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Lawrence (Program Office) 202-586-5260. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exports of electricity from the United States to a foreign country are regulated by the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to sections 301(b) and 402(f) of

  2. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    0017 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2011 / Notices 1 Enforcement of Statutes, Orders, Rules, and Regulations, 132 FERC ¶ 61,216 (2010). Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive copies of the environmental documents, and will be

  3. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    1850 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 137 / Monday, July 19, 2010 / Notices 1 The NOI identified the title of the document as the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Surplus Plutonium Disposition at the Savannah River Site. Issued in Washington, DC, on July 9, 2010. Cathy Zoi, Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. [FR Doc. 2010-17514 Filed 7-16-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No.

  4. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    781 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 100 / Thursday, May 22, 2008 / Notices February 4, 2008. Along with publication in the Federal Register, written notice of the availability of the Draft EIS was also published in four local and regional newspapers (in English and Spanish) and over 200 copies of the document were distributed to federal, state and local government agencies, elected officials, public libraries, interested organizations, and individuals. Public hearings concerning the proposed

  5. Test and evaluation document for DOT Specification 7A Type A Packaging. Revision 3

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-01-30

    The US Department of Energy (DOE) has been conducting, through several of its operating contractors, an evaluation and testing program to qualify Type A radioactive material packagings per US Department of Transportation (DOT) Specification 7A (DOT-7A) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 49, Part 178 (49 CFR 178). The program is currently administered by the DOE, Office of Facility Safety Analysis, DOE/EH-32, at DOE-Headquarters (DOE-HQ) in Germantown, Maryland. This document summarizes the evaluation and testing performed for all of the packagings successfully qualified in this program.

  6. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    February 6, 2004 Part II The President Executive Order 13327-Federal Real Property Asset Management VerDate jul<14>2003 12:11 Feb 05, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\06FEE0.SGM 06FEE0 VerDate jul<14>2003 12:11 Feb 05, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\06FEE0.SGM 06FEE0 Presidential Documents 5897 Federal Register Vol. 69, No. 25 Friday, February 6, 2004 Title 3- The President Executive Order 13327 of February 4, 2004

  7. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Part Executive VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:32 Jan 25, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\26JAE0.SGM 26JAE0 mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS5 Presidential Documents 3919 Federal Register Vol. 72, No. 17 Friday, January 26, 2007 Title 3- The President Executive Order 13423 of January 24, 2007 Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transpor- tation Management By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United

  8. UMTRA Surface Project management action process document. Final report: Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-04-01

    A critical mission of the US Department of Energy (DOE) is the planning, implementation, and completion of environmental restoration (ER) programs at facilities that were operated by or in support of the former Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) from the late 1940s into the 1970s. Among these facilities are the 24 former uranium mill sites designed in the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978 (42 USC {section} 7901 et seq.) Title 1 of the UMTRCA authorized the DOE to undertake remedial actions at these designated sites and associated vicinity properties (VP), which contain uranium mill tailings and other residual radioactive materials (RRM) derived from the processing sites. Title 2 of the UMTRCA addresses uranium mill sites that were licensed at the time the UMTRCA was enacted. Cleanup of these Title 2 sites is the responsibility of the licensees. The cleanup of the Title 1 sites has been split into two separate projects: the Surface Project, which deals with the mill buildings, tailings, and contaminated soils at the sites and VPs; and the Ground Water Project, which is limited to the contaminated ground water at the sites. This management action process (MAP) document discusses the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Surface Project only; a separate MAP document has been prepared for the UMTRA Ground Water Project.

  9. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 155 / Friday, August 9, 1996 / Notices inquiries to the Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996-5000. Individual should provide the full name, Social Security Number, and signature. CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: The Army's rules for accessing records, and for contesting contents and appealing initial agency determinations are contained in Army Regulation 340- 21; 32 CFR part 505; or may be obtained from the system manager. RECORD SOURCE

  10. Microsoft Word - CCP-PO-012-Revision 15

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    PO-012 Revision 15 CCP/Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Interface Document EFFECTIVE DATE: 01/23/2014 Mike Ramirez PRINTED NAME APPROVED FOR USE INFORMATION ONLY CCP-PO-012, Rev. 15 Effective Date: 01/23/2014 CCP/Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Interface Document Page 2 of 54 RECORD OF REVISION Revision Number Date Approved Description of Revision 0 10/21/2003 Initial Issue. 1 12/16/2003 Revised the Scope of the document. Updated Section 2.1 References. Updated Section 3.0, steps 3.7

  11. Addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Patrick Matthews and Christy Sloop

    2012-01-01

    This document constitutes an addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 0), April 2011.

  12. Documentation for initial testing and inspections of Beneficial Uses Shipping System (BUSS) Cask

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lundeen, J.E.

    1994-08-25

    The purpose of this report is to compile data generated during the initial tests and inspections of the Beneficial Uses Shipping System (BUSS) Cask. In addition, this report will verify that the testing criteria identified in section 8.1 of the BUSS Cask Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) was met. The BUSS Cask Model R-1 is a type B shipping container used for shipment of radioactive cesium-137 and strontium-90 capsules to Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF). The BUSS Cask body and lid are each one-piece forgings fabricated from ASTM A473, Type 304 stainless steel. The primary purpose of the BUSS Cask is to provide shielding and confinement as well as impact, puncture, and thermal protection for the capsules under both normal and accident conditions. Chapter 8 of the BUSS Cask SARP requires several acceptance tests and inspections, each intended to evaluate the performance of different components of the BUSS Cask system, to be performed before its first use. The results of the tests and inspections required are included in this document.

  13. Savannah River Site mixed waste Proposed Site Treatment Plan (PSTP). Volumes 1 and 2 and reference document: Revision 2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Helmich, E.; Noller, D.K.; Wierzbicki, K.S.; Bailey, L.L.

    1995-07-13

    The DOE is required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to prepare site treatment plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. This proposed plan contains Savannah River Site`s preferred options and schedules for constructing new facilities, and otherwise obtaining treatment for mixed wastes. The proposed plan consists of 2 volumes. Volume 1, Compliance Plan, identifies the capacity to be developed and the schedules as required. Volume 2, Background, provides a detailed discussion of the preferred options with technical basis, plus a description of the specific waste streams. Chapters are: Introduction; Methodology; Mixed low level waste streams; Mixed transuranic waste; High level waste; Future generation of mixed waste streams; Storage; Process for evaluation of disposal issues in support of the site treatment plans discussions; Treatment facilities and treatment technologies; Offsite waste streams for which SRS treatment is the Preferred Option (Naval reactor wastes); Summary information; and Acronyms and glossary. This revision does not contain the complete revised report, but only those pages that have been revised.

  14. Addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 529: Area 25 Contaminated Materials, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Krauss, Mark J

    2013-10-01

    This document constitutes an addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 529: Area 25 Contaminated Materials, Nevada Test Site, Nevada as described in the document Recommendations and Justifications To Remove Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order dated September 2013. The Use Restriction (UR) Removal document was approved by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection on October 16, 2013. The approval of the UR Removal document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR removals. In conformance with the UR Removal document, this addendum consists of: This page that refers the reader to the UR Removal document for additional information The cover, title, and signature pages of the UR Removal document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the UR Removal document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the UR for CAS 25-23-17, Contaminated Wash (Parcel H). This UR was established as part of FFACO corrective actions and was based on the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbon diesel-range organics contamination at concentrations greater than the NDEP action level at the time of the initial investigation.

  15. IDC System Specification Document Version 1.1.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Harris, James M.; Lober, Randall R.

    2015-02-01

    This document contains the system specifications derived to satisfy the system requirements found in the IDC System Requirements Document for the IDC Reengineering Phase 2 project. Revisions Version Date Author/Team Revision Description Authorized by V1.0 12/2014 IDC Reengineering Project Team Initial delivery M. Harris V1.1 2/2015 IDC Reengineering Project Team Iteration I2 Review Comments M. Harris

  16. CORRECTIVE ACTION DECISION DOCUMENT FOR THE AREA 3 LANDFILL COMPLEX, TONOPAH TEST RANGE, CAU 424, REVISION 0, MARCH 1998

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    DOE /NV

    1998-03-03

    This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) has been prepared for the Area 3 Landfill Complex (Corrective Action Unit [CAU] 424) in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) of 1996. Corrective Action Unit 424 is located at the Tonopah Test Range (TTR) and is comprised of the following Corrective Action Sites (CASs), each an individual landfill located around and within the perimeter of the Area 3 Compound (DOE/NV, 1996a): (1) Landfill A3-1 is CAS No. 03-08-001-A301. (2) Landfill A3-2 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A302. (3) Landfill A3-3 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A303. (4) Landfill A3-4 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A304. (5) Landfill A3-5 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A305. (6) Landfill A3-6 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A306. (7) Landfill A3-7 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A307. (8) Landfill A3-8 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A308. The purpose of this CADD is to identify and provide a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for each CAS. The scope of this CADD consists of the following: (1) Develop corrective action objectives. (2) Identify corrective action alternative screening criteria. (3) Develop corrective action alternatives. (4) Perform detailed and comparative evaluations of the corrective action alternatives in relation to the corrective action objectives and screening criteria. (6) Recommend and justify a preferred corrective action alternative for each CAS. In June and July 1997, a corrective action investigation was performed as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) for CAU No. 424: Area 3 Landfill Complex, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1997). Details can be found in Appendix A of this document. The results indicated four groupings of site characteristics as shown in Table ES-1. Based on the potential exposure pathways, the following corrective action objectives have been identified for CAU No. 424: (1) Prevent or mitigate human exposure to subsurface soils containing waste. (2) Remediate the site per applicable state and federal regulations (NAC, 1996c). (3) Prevent adverse impacts to groundwater quality. Based on the review of existing data, future land use, and current operations at the TTR, the following alternatives were developed for consideration at the Area 3 Landfill Complex CAU: Alternative 1 - No Action; Alternative 2 - Administrative Closure; Alternative 3 - Partial Excavation, Backfill, and Recontouring The corrective action alternatives were evaluated based on four general corrective action standards and five remedy-selection decision factors. Based on the results of this evaluation, preferred alternatives were selected for each CAS as indicated in Table ES-2. The preferred corrective action alternatives were evaluated on their technical merits, focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, and safety. The alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. These alternatives meet all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the site and will reduce potential future exposure pathways to the contents of the landfills. During corrective action implementation, these alternatives will present minimal potential threat to site workers who come in contact with the waste. However, procedures will be developed and implemented to ensure worker health and safety.

  17. Corrrective action decision document for the Cactus Spring Waste Trenches (Corrective Action Unit No. 426). Revision No. 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-06-01

    The Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) for the Cactus Spring Waste Trenches (Corrective Action Unit [CAU] No. 426) has been prepared for the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Nevada Environmental Restoration Project. This CADD has been developed to meet the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) of 1996, stated in Appendix VI, {open_quotes}Corrective Action Strategy{close_quotes} (FFACO, 1996). The Cactus Spring Waste Trenches Corrective Action Site (CAS) No. RG-08-001-RG-CS is included in CAU No. 426 (also referred to as the {open_quotes}trenches{close_quotes}); it has been identified as one of three potential locations for buried, radioactively contaminated materials from the Double Tracks Test. The trenches are located on the east flank of the Cactus Range in the eastern portion of the Cactus Spring Ranch at the Tonopah Test Range (TTR) in Nye County, Nevada, on the northern portion of Nellis Air Force Range. The TTR is approximately 225 kilometers (km) (140 miles [mi]) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada, by air and approximately 56 km (35 mi) southeast of Tonopah, Nevada, by road. The trenches were dug for the purpose of receiving waste generated during Operation Roller Coaster, primarily the Double Tracks Test. This test, conducted in 1963, involved the use of live animals to assess the biological hazards associated with non-nuclear detonation of plutonium-bearing devices (i.e., inhalation uptake of plutonium aerosol). The CAS consists of four trenches that received solid waste and had an overall impacted area of approximately 36 meters (m) (120 feet [ft]) long x 24 m (80 ft) wide x 3 to 4.5 m (10 to 15 ft) deep. The average depressions at the trenches are approximately 0.3 m (1 ft) below land surface.

  18. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 560: Septic Systems, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Grant Evenson

    2010-04-01

    Corrective Action Unit560 comprises seven corrective action sites (CASs): 03-51-01, Leach Pit 06-04-02, Septic Tank 06-05-03, Leach Pit 06-05-04, Leach Bed 06-59-03, Building CP-400 Septic System 06-59-04, Office Trailer Complex Sewage Pond 06-59-05, Control Point Septic System The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 560 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 7, 2008, through February 24, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit560: Septic Systems, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, and Record of Technical Change No.1. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: Determine whether contaminants of concern (COCs) are present. If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The CAU 560 dataset from the investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the dataset for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. The following contaminants were determined to be present at concentrations exceeding their corresponding FALs: No contamination exceeding the FALs was identified at CASs 03-51-01, 06-04-02, and06-59-04. The soil at the base of the leach pit chamber at CAS06-05-03 contains arsenic above the FAL of 23 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs) above the FAL of 0.74 mg/kg, confined vertically from a depth of approximately 5 to 20 feet (ft) below ground surface. The contamination is confined laterally to the walls of the leach pit chamber and leach rock. The contamination present at CAS 06-05-03 within the leach pit was not feasible to remove. The surface and subsurface soils within and surrounding the septic system at CAS 06-05-04 contained PCB concentrations above the FAL of 0.74 mg/kg. Thelateral and vertical extent of COCs was determined for this CAS. Contaminated soils were removed up to within 18 ft of the building. The remaining contamination is confined to subsurface soils adjacent to and beneath BuildingCP-162 and was not feasible to remove. The solid materials within the septic tank and soils immediately surrounding the inlet end of the tank at CAS 06-59-03 contained benzo(a)pyrene above the FAL of 0.21 mg/kg. The soils, tank contents, and tank were removed. Materials remaining at this CAS do not contain contamination exceeding FALs. The solids contained within the septic tank and inlet pipe at CAS 06-59-05 contained the following contaminants above their respective FALs: PCBs, arsenic, lead, benzo(a)pyrene, and pesticides. The tank and inlet pipe contents were removed. Materials remaining at this CAS do not contain contamination exceeding FALs. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) provides the following corrective action recommendations: No further action for CASs 03-51-01, 06-04-02, and 06-59-04, as no contaminants of potential concern were present that exceed FALs. Closure in place for CAS 06-05-03 under a corrective action with a use restriction (UR) for remaining PCB- and arsenic-impacted potential source material (PSM). The UR form and map have been filed in the NNSA/NSO Facility Information Management System, the FFACO database, and NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Closure in place for CAS 06-05-04 under a corrective action with a UR for remaining PCBs in soil adjacent to and beneath Building CP-162. The UR form and map have been filed in the NNSA/NSO Facility Information Management System, the FFACO database, and NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. No further action for CAS 06-59-0

  19. Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 562: Waste Systems Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mark Krause

    2010-08-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) presents information supporting the selection of corrective action alternatives (CAAs) leading to the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 562, Waste Systems, in Areas 2, 23, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, Nevada. This complies with the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management. Corrective Action Unit 562 comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): 02-26-11, Lead Shot 02-44-02, Paint Spills and French Drain 02-59-01, Septic System 02-60-01, Concrete Drain 02-60-02, French Drain 02-60-03, Steam Cleaning Drain 02-60-04, French Drain 02-60-05, French Drain 02-60-06, French Drain 02-60-07, French Drain 23-60-01, Mud Trap Drain and Outfall 23-99-06, Grease Trap 25-60-04, Building 3123 Outfalls The purpose of this CADD is to identify and provide the rationale for the recommendation of CAAs for the 13 CASs within CAU 562. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from July 27, 2009, through May 12, 2010, as set forth in the CAU 562 Corrective Action Investigation Plan. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: Determine whether COCs are present. If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. A data quality assessment (DQA) performed on the CAU 562 data demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the data for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against appropriate final action levels (FALs) to identify the COCs for each CAS. The results of the CAI identified COCs at 10 of the 13 CASs in CAU 562, and thus corrective action is required. Assessment of the data generated from investigation activities conducted at CAU 562 is shown in Table ES-1. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, review of future and current operations at the 13 CASs, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, the following corrective actions are recommended for CAU 562. No further action is the preferred corrective action for CASs 02-60-01, 02-60-06, and 02-60-07. Clean closure is the preferred corrective action for CASs 02-26-11, 02-44-02, 02-59-01, 02-60-02, 02-60-03, 02-60-04, 02-60-05, 23-60-01, 23-99-06, and 25-60-04. The preferred CAAs were evaluated on technical merit focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, safety, and cost. The alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. The alternatives meet all applicable federal and state regulations for closure of the site and will reduce potential exposures to contaminated media to acceptable levels. The DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office provides the following recommendations: No further corrective action is required at CASs 02-60-01, 02-60-06, and 02-60-07. Clean closure is recommended for the remaining 10 CASs in CAU 562. A Corrective Action Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection that contains a detailed description of the proposed actions that will be taken to implement the selected corrective actions.

  20. Phase II Documentation Overview of Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada, Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Greg Ruskauff

    2010-04-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) initiated the Underground Test Area (UGTA) Subproject to assess and evaluate radiologic groundwater contamination resulting from underground nuclear testing at the NTS. These activities are overseen by the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) (1996, as amended March 2010). For Frenchman Flat, the UGTA Subproject addresses media contaminated by the underground nuclear tests, which is limited to geologic formations within the saturated zone or 100 meters (m) or less above the water table. Transport in groundwater is judged to be the primary mechanism of migration for the subsurface contamination away from the Frenchman Flat underground nuclear tests. The intent of the UGTA Subproject is to assess the risk to the public from the groundwater contamination produced as a result of nuclear testing. The primary method used to assess this risk is the development of models of flow and contaminant transport to forecast the extent of potentially contaminated groundwater for the next 1,000 years, establish restrictions to groundwater usage, and implement a monitoring program to verify protectiveness. For the UGTA Subproject, contaminated groundwater is that which exceeds the radiological standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (CFR, 2009) the State of Nevadas groundwater quality standard to protect human health and the environment. Contaminant forecasts are expected to be uncertain, and groundwater monitoring will be used in combination with land-use control to build confidence in model results and reduce risk to the public. Modeling forecasts of contaminant transport will provide the basis for negotiating a compliance boundary for the Frenchman Flat Corrective Action Unit (CAU). This compliance boundary represents a regulatory-based distinction between groundwater contaminated or not contaminated by underground testing. Transport modeling simulations are used to compute radionuclide concentrations in time and space within the CAU for the 1,000-year contaminant boundary. These three-dimensional (3-D) concentration simulations are integrated into probabilistic forecasts of the likelihood of groundwater exceeding or remaining below the radiological standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (CFR, 2009) defined as the contaminant boundary. Contaminant boundaries are not discrete predictions of the location or concentration of contaminants, but instead are spatial representations of the probability of exceeding Safe Drinking Water Act radiological standards. The forecasts provide planning tools to facilitate regulatory decisions designed to protect the health and safety of the public.

  1. Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002) | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002) Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002) PDF icon Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002) More Documents & Publications Operating Guidelines Appendix A B.DOC&#0; DOE HR Guidebook 12_15_05.DOC&#0; Operating Guidelines Appendix C D

  2. ETA-HTP04 - Hybrid Electric Vehicle Constant Speed Range Tests - Revision 1

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 Revision 1 Effective October 1, 2005 Hybrid Electric Vehicle Constant Speed Range Tests Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:_________ Roberta Brayer Approved by: _________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald Karner i Procedure ETA-HTP04 Revision 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Objectives 1 2. Purpose 1 3. Documentation 1 4. Initial Conditions and Prerequisites 1 5. Testing Activity Requirements 4 5.1 Range

  3. ETA-HTP13 Onboard Generator Energy Efficiency Test - Revision 0

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    3 Revision 0 Effective June 28, 2005 Onboard Generator Energy Efficiency Test Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _________________________________ Date: ________ Ryan Harkins Approved by: ____________________________________________________ Date: ____________ Donald Karner i ETA-HTP13 Revision 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Objectives 1 2. Purpose 1 3. Documentation Support 1 4. Initial Conditions and Prerequisites 2 5. Testing Activity Requirements 3 6. Glossary 5 7.

  4. ETA-HTP11 - Vehicle Verification - Revision 1

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    1 Revision 1 Effective October 1, 2005 Vehicle Verification Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Garrett Beauregard Approved by: _________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner ©2004 Electric Transportation Applications All Rights Reserved Procedure ETA-HTP11 Revision 0 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objectives 3 2.0 Purpose 3 3.0 Documentation 3 4.0 Initial Conditions and

  5. ETA-NTP011 Vehicle Verification - Revision 4

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ETA-NTP011 Revision 4 Effective February 1, 2008 Vehicle Verification Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Nick Fengler Date:__________ Approved by: _________________________________________________ Donald B. Karner Date: _______________ 2 Procedure ETA-NTP011 Revision 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objectives 3 2.0 Purpose 3 3.0 Documentation 3 4.0 Initial Conditions and Prerequisites 4 5.0 Verification Requirements 5.1 Minimum Requirements 5

  6. ETA-HAC01 - Control, Close-out and Storage of Documentation

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    1 Revision 0 Effective November 1, 2004 Control, Close-out and Storage of Documentation Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Roberta Brayer Approved by: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner Procedure ETA-HAC01 Revision 0 2 2004 Electric Transportation Applications All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objectives 3 2.0 Purpose 3 3.0 Documentation 3 4.0 Initial

  7. ETA-HIAC01 - Control, Close-out and Storage of Documentation

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    1 Revision 0 Effective May 1, 2004 Control, Close-out and Storage of Documentation Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Roberta Brayer Approved by: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner Procedure ETA-HIAC01 Revision 0 2 2004 Electric Transportation Applications All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objectives 3 2.0 Purpose 3 3.0 Documentation 3 4.0 Initial Conditions

  8. ETA-NAC001 - Control, Close-out and Storage of Documentation

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NAC001 Revision 0 Effective October 15, 2001 Control, Close-out and Storage of Documentation Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Jude M. Clark Approved by: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner Procedure ETA-NAC001 Revision 0 2 2001 Electric Transportation Applications All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objectives 3 2.0 Purpose 3 3.0 Documentation 3 4.0 Initial

  9. ETA-UAC01 - Control, Close-out and Storage of Documentation

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    1 Revision 0 Effective March 23, 2001 Control, Close-out and Storage of Documentation Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Jude M. Clark Approved by: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner Procedure ETA-UAC01 Revision 0 2 ©2001 Electric Transportation Applications All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objectives 3 2.0 Purpose 3 3.0 Documentation 3 4.0 Initial Conditions

  10. DOCUMENT RELEASE FORM

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    6992 (2) Revision Number: 0 1(3) Effective Date: 9.- -, (4) Document Type: Digital Image DHard copy (a) Number of pages (including the DIRF) or Z PDF zVideo number of digital ...

  11. CASL-U-2015-0040-000 Initial Boiling Water

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    0-000 Initial Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) Input Specifications Scott Palmtag Core Physics February 28, 2015 Initial Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) Input Specification Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs ii CASL-U-2015-0040-000 REVISION LOG Revision Date Affected Pages Revision Description 0 02/28/2015 All Original Report for L3:PHI.VCS.P10.02 Document pages that are: Export Controlled NO IP/Proprietary/NDA Controlled NO Sensitive Controlled NO Requested Distribution: To: Copy: Initial

  12. WIPP Documents - Nuclear Safety

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Nuclear Safety DOE/WIPP-07-3372, Revision 4 WIPP Documented Safety Analysis Approved November 2013 The Documented Safety Analysis addresses all hazards (both radiological and nonradiological) and the controls necessary to provide adequate protection to the public, workers, and the environment. The WIPP DSA demonstrates the extent to which the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant can be operated safely with respect to workers, the public, and the environment. DOE/WIPP-07-3373, Revision 4 WIPP Technical

  13. Initial

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Initial operation of a pulse-burst laser system for high-repetition-rate Thomson scattering a... W. S. Harris, 1 D. J. Den Hartog, 1,2 and N. C. Hurst 1 1 Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA 2 Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA ͑Presented 17 May 2010; received 12 May 2010; accepted 31 May 2010; published online 1 October 2010͒ A

  14. Test documentation for converting TWRS baseline data from RDD-100 V3.0.2.2 to V4.0.3. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gneiting, B.C.; Johnston, M.E.

    1996-05-03

    This document describes the test documentation required for converting between two versions of the RDD-100 software application, specifically version 3.0.2.2 and version 4.0.3. The area of focus in the successful conversion of the master data set between two versions of the database tool and their corresponding data structures.

  15. Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Irene Farnham and Sam Marutzky

    2011-07-01

    This CADD/CAP follows the Corrective Action Investigation (CAI) stage, which results in development of a set of contaminant boundary forecasts produced from groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling of the Frenchman Flat CAU. The Frenchman Flat CAU is located in the southeastern portion of the NNSS and comprises 10 underground nuclear tests. The tests were conducted between 1965 and 1971 and resulted in the release of radionuclides in the subsurface in the vicinity of the test cavities. Two important aspects of the corrective action process are presented within this CADD/CAP. The CADD portion describes the results of the Frenchman Flat CAU data-collection and modeling activities completed during the CAI stage. The corrective action objectives and the actions recommended to meet the objectives are also described. The CAP portion describes the corrective action implementation plan. The CAP begins with the presentation of CAU regulatory boundary objectives and initial use restriction boundaries that are identified and negotiated by NNSA/NSO and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP). The CAP also presents the model evaluation process designed to build confidence that the flow and contaminant transport modeling results can be used for the regulatory decisions required for CAU closure. The first two stages of the strategy have been completed for the Frenchman Flat CAU. A value of information analysis and a CAIP were developed during the CAIP stage. During the CAI stage, a CAIP addendum was developed, and the activities proposed in the CAIP and addendum were completed. These activities included hydrogeologic investigation of the underground testing areas, aquifer testing, isotopic and geochemistry-based investigations, and integrated geophysical investigations. After these investigations, a groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was developed to forecast contaminant boundaries that enclose areas potentially exceeding the Safe Drinking Water Act radiological standards at any time within 1,000 years. An external peer review of the groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was completed, and the model was accepted by NDEP to allow advancement to the CADD/CAP stage. The CADD/CAP stage focuses on model evaluation to ensure that existing models provide adequate guidance for the regulatory decisions regarding monitoring and institutional controls. Data-collection activities are identified and implemented to address key uncertainties in the flow and contaminant transport models. During the CR stage, final use restriction boundaries and CAU regulatory boundaries are negotiated and established; a long-term closure monitoring program is developed and implemented; and the approaches and policies for institutional controls are initiated. The model evaluation process described in this plan consists of an iterative series of five steps designed to build confidence in the site conceptual model and model forecasts. These steps are designed to identify data-collection activities (Step 1), document the data-collection activities in the 0CADD/CAP (Step 2), and perform the activities (Step 3). The new data are then assessed; the model is refined, if necessary; the modeling results are evaluated; and a model evaluation report is prepared (Step 4). The assessments are made by the modeling team and presented to the pre-emptive review committee. The decision is made by the modeling team with the assistance of the pre-emptive review committee and concurrence of NNSA/NSO to continue data and model assessment/refinement, recommend additional data collection, or recommend advancing to the CR stage. A recommendation to advance to the CR stage is based on whether the model is considered to be sufficiently reliable for designing a monitoring system and developing effective institutional controls. The decision to advance to the CR stage or to return to step 1 of the process is then made by NDEP (Step 5).

  16. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 571: Area 9 Yucca Flat Plutonium Dispersion Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Matthews, Patrick

    2014-08-01

    The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide documentation and justification that no further corrective action is needed for the closure of CAU 571 based on the implementation of corrective actions. This includes a description of investigation activities, an evaluation of the data, and a description of corrective actions that were performed. The CAIP provides information relating to the scope and planning of the investigation. Therefore, that information will not be repeated in this document.

  17. ETA-HTP01 Revision 2 - Implementation of SAE Standard J2263-Road Load Measurement Using Onboard Anemometry and Coastdown Techniques

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    HTP01 Revision 2 Effective February 1, 2008 Implementation of SAE Standard J2263 "Road Load Measurement Using Onboard Anemometry and Coastdown Techniques" Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date: __________ Garrett Beauregard Approved by: _______________________________________________ Date: ______________ Donald Karner ETA-HTP01 Revision 2 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Objectives 1 2. Purpose 1 3. Documentation 1 4. Initial

  18. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Matthews, Patrick

    2013-11-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. This complies with the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management. The purpose of the CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed.

  19. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Matthews, Patrick

    2014-01-01

    The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 105 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 22, 2012, through May 23, 2013, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices.

  20. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Matthews, Patrick

    2013-09-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 105 comprises the following five corrective action sites (CASs): -02-23-04 Atmospheric Test Site - Whitney Closure In Place -02-23-05 Atmospheric Test Site T-2A Closure In Place -02-23-06 Atmospheric Test Site T-2B Clean Closure -02-23-08 Atmospheric Test Site T-2 Closure In Place -02-23-09 Atmospheric Test Site - Turk Closure In Place The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 105 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 22, 2012, through May 23, 2013, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices.

  1. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 557: Spills and Tank Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Alfred Wickline

    2009-05-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 557, Spills and Tank Sites, in Areas 1, 3, 6, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 557 comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): 01-25-02, Fuel Spill 03-02-02, Area 3 Subdock UST 06-99-10, Tar Spills 25-25-18, Train Maintenance Bldg 3901 Spill Site The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to identify and provide the justification and documentation that supports the recommendation for closure of the CAU 557 CASs with no further corrective action. To achieve this, a corrective action investigation (CAI) was conducted from May 5 through November 24, 2008. The CAI activities were performed as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 557: Spills and Tank Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada.

  2. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 567: Miscellaneous Soil Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Matthews, Patrick

    2014-12-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 567: Miscellaneous Soil Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 567 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. The corrective actions implemented at CAU 567 were developed based on an evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, the assumed presence of COCs at specific locations, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the CAAs. The CAAs were selected on technical merit focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, safety, and cost. The implemented corrective actions meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. The CAAs meet all applicable federal and state regulations for closure of the site. Based on the implementation of these corrective actions, the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 567. The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection issue a Notice of Completion to the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office for closure of CAU 567. CAU 567 be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  3. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 550: Smoky Contamination Area Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Matthews, Patrick K.

    2015-02-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 550: Smoky Contamination Area, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 550 includes 19 corrective action sites (CASs), which consist of one weapons-related atmospheric test (Smoky), three safety experiments (Ceres, Oberon, Titania), and 15 debris sites (Table ES-1). The CASs were sorted into the following study groups based on release potential and technical similarities: Study Group 1, Atmospheric Test Study Group 2, Safety Experiments Study Group 3, Washes Study Group 4, Debris The purpose of this document is to provide justification and documentation supporting the conclusion that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 550 based on implementation of the corrective actions listed in Table ES-1. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed between August 2012 and October 2013 as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 550: Smoky Contamination Area; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan. The approach for the CAI was to investigate and make data quality objective (DQO) decisions based on the types of releases present. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the DQO process. The CAU 550 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs.

  4. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 190: Contaminated Waste Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Alfred Wickline

    2008-03-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 190, Contaminated Waste Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy, Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management (1996, as amended January 2007). Corrective Action Unit 190 is comprised of the following four corrective action sites (CASs): 11-02-01, Underground Centrifuge 11-02-02, Drain Lines and Outfall 11-59-01, Tweezer Facility Septic System 14-23-01, LTU-6 Test Area The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 190 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from March 21 through June 26, 2007. All CAI activities were conducted as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 190: Contaminated Waste Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (NNSA/NSO, 2006). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective process: Determine whether contaminants of concern (COCs) are present. If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The CAU 190 dataset from the investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the dataset for use in fulfilling the data quality objective data needs.

  5. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 371: Johnnie Boy Crater and Pin Stripe Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Patrick Matthews

    2010-07-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit 371, Johnnie Boy Crater and Pin Stripe, located within Areas 11 and 18 at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 371 comprises two corrective action sites (CASs): 11-23-05, Pin Stripe Contamination Area 18-45-01, U-18j-2 Crater (Johnnie Boy) The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 371 based on the implementation of corrective actions. The corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls was implemented at both CASs. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from January 8, 2009, through February 16, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 371: Johnnie Boy Crater and Pin Stripe. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 371 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. Radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were not found to be present in the surface soil. However, it was assumed that radionuclides are present in subsurface media within the Johnnie Boy crater and the fissure at Pin Stripe. Due to the assumption of radiological dose exceeding the FAL, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each site. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 371. A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 371. Corrective Action Unit 371 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  6. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Patrick Matthews

    2011-09-01

    Corrective Action Unit 365 comprises one corrective action site (CAS), CAS 08-23-02, U-8d Contamination Area. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 365 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with a use restriction (UR). Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from January 18, 2011, through August 2, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 365 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in supporting the DQO decisions. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present to the southwest of the Baneberry crater. It was also assumed that radionuclide levels present within the crater and fissure exceed the FAL. Corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of establishing a UR and posting warning signs for the crater, fissure, and the area located to the southwest of the crater where soil concentrations exceeded the FAL. These URs were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions beyond what are described in this document are necessary for CAU 365. (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 365. (3) Corrective Action Unit 365 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  7. ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision 1) More Documents & Publications ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21: AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS Audiovisual Records ADM 21...

  8. Tank Monitor and Control System (TMACS) Version Description Document (VDD)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    BARNES, D.A.

    2000-07-06

    This document updates the Version Description Document with the changes incorporated in the Revision 12.0 software installation on the Tank Monitor and Control System (TMACS).

  9. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Matthews, Patrick and Sloop, Christy

    2011-04-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD)/Closure Report (CR) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 372, Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, located within Areas 18 and 20 at the Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 372 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): 18-45-02, Little Feller I Surface Crater 18-45-03, Little Feller II Surface Crater 20-23-01, U-20k Contamination Area 20-45-01, U-20L Crater (Cabriolet) The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 372 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls at all CASs. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from November 9, 2009, through December 10, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 372 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL was established of 25 millirem per year based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present at all four CASs. It is assumed that radionuclide levels present within the Little Feller I and Cabriolet high contamination areas and within the craters at Palanquin and Cabriolet exceed the FAL. It is also assumed that potential source material in the form of lead bricks at Little Feller I and lead-acid batteries at Palanquin and Cabriolet exceed the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of removing potential source material, where present, and implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each CAS. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 372. A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 372. Corrective Action Unit 372 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  10. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Patrick Matthews

    2011-06-01

    Corrective Action Unit 367 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): 10-09-03, Mud Pit 10-45-01, U-10h Crater (Sedan) 10-45-02, Ess Crater Site 10-45-03, Uncle Crater Site The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation of the corrective actions and site closure activities implemented at CAU 367. A corrective action of closure in place with use restrictions was completed at each of the three crater CASs (10-45-01, 10-45-02, and 10-45-03); corrective actions were not required at CAS 10-09-03. In addition, a limited soil removal corrective action was conducted at the location of a potential source material release. Based on completion of these correction actions, no additional corrective action is required at CAU 367, and site closure is considered complete. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from February 2010 through March 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of non-test or other releases (e.g., migration in washes and potential source material). Based on the proximity of the Uncle, Ess, and Sedan craters, the impact of the Sedan test on the fallout deposited from the two earlier tests, and aerial radiological surveys, the CAU 367 investigation was designed to study the releases from the three crater CASs as one combined release (primary release). Corrective Action Site 10-09-03, Mud Pit, consists of two mud pits identified at CAU 367. The mud pits are considered non-test releases or other releases and were investigated independent of the three crater CASs. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 367 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. For the primary release, radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were not found to be present in the surface or shallow subsurface soil outside the default contamination boundary. However, it was assumed that radionuclides are present in subsurface media within each of the three craters (Sedan, Ess, and Uncle) due to prompt injection of radionuclides from the tests. Based on the assumption of radiological dose exceeding the FAL, corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each crater CAS. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. With regard to other releases, no contaminants of concern were identified at the mud pits or any of the other release locations, with one exception. Potential source material in the form of lead was found at one location. A corrective action of clean closure was implemented at this location, and verification samples indicated that no further action is necessary. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 367. Corrective Action Unit 367 should be promoted from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  11. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 374: Area 20 Schooner Unit Crater, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Patrick Matthews

    2011-07-01

    Corrective Action Unit 374 comprises five corrective action sites (CASs): 18-22-05, Drum 18-22-06, Drums (20) 18-22-08, Drum 18-23-01, Danny Boy Contamination Area 20-45-03, U-20u Crater (Schooner) The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 374 based on the implementation of corrective actions. The corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls was implemented at CASs 18-23-01 and 20-45-03, and a corrective action of removing potential source material (PSM) was conducted at CAS 20-45-03. The other CASs require no further action; however, best management practices of removing PSM and drums at CAS 18-22-06, and removing drums at CAS 18-22-08 were performed. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from May 4 through October 6, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 374: Area 20 Schooner Unit Crater, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigating the primary release of radionuclides and investigating other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 374 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. Radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were found to be present in the surface soil that was sampled. It is assumed that radionuclide levels present in subsurface media within the craters and ejecta fields (default contamination boundaries) at the Danny Boy and Schooner sites exceed the FAL. It is also assumed that PSM in the form of lead-acid batteries at Schooner exceeds the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of removing PSM, where present, and implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at the Danny Boy and Schooner sites. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 374. A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 374. Corrective Action Unit 374 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  12. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 106: Area 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Patrick Matthews and Dawn Peterson

    2011-09-01

    Corrective Action Unit 106 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): (1) 05-20-02, Evaporation Pond; (2) 05-23-05, Atmospheric Test Site - Able; (3) 05-45-04, 306 GZ Rad Contaminated Area; (4) 05-45-05, 307 GZ Rad Contaminated Area. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 106 based on the implementation of corrective actions. The corrective action of clean closure was implemented at CASs 05-45-04 and 05-45-05, while no corrective action was necessary at CASs 05-20-02 and 05-23-05. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 20, 2010, through June 1, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 106: Areas 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of other releases (mechanical displacement and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 106 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Industrial Area exposure scenario (2,250 hours of annual exposure). The only radiological dose exceeding the FAL was at CAS 05-45-05 and was associated with potential source material (PSM). It is also assumed that additional PSM in the form of depleted uranium (DU) and DU-contaminated debris at CASs 05-45-04 and 05-45-05 exceed the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken at these CASs that consisted of removing PSM and collecting verification samples. Results of verification samples show that remaining soil does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 106. (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 106. (3) Corrective Action Unit 106 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  13. Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 5: Landfills, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision No. 0 (with Record of Technical Change No. 1)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

    2003-10-24

    This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies and rationalizes the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's selection of a recommended corrective action alternative (CAA) appropriate to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action (CAU) 5: Landfills, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in Areas 5, 6, 12, 20, and 23 of the NTS, CAU 5 is comprised of eight corrective action sites (CASs). The corrective action investigation (CAI) of CAU 5 was conducted from October 7, 2002 through January 30, 2003, with geophysical surveys completed from March 6 through May 8, 2002, and topographic surveys conducted from March 11 through April 29, 2003. Contaminants of concern (COCs) were identified only at CAS 12-15-01. Those COCs included total petroleum hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, review of future and current operations in Areas 5, 6, 12, 20, and 23 of the Nevada Test Site, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, the following single alternative was developed for consideration. Close in Place with Administrative Controls is the recommended alternative for all of the CASs in CAU 5. This alternative was judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. Additionally, the alternative meets all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the sites and will eliminate inadvertent intrusion into landfills at CAU 5.

  14. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 375: Area 30 Buggy Unit Craters, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Patrick Matthews

    2011-08-01

    Corrective Action Unit 375 comprises three corrective action sites (CASs): (1) 25-23-22, Contaminated Soils Site; (2) 25-34-06, Test Cell A Bunker; and (3) 30-45-01, U-30a, b, c, d, e Craters. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 375 based on the implementation of corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls at CAS 25-23-22, no further action at CAS 25-34-06, and closure in place with administrative controls and removal of potential source material (PSM) at CAS 30-45-01. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from July 28, 2010, through April 4, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 375: Area 30 Buggy Unit Craters. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 375 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were assumed to be present within the default contamination boundaries at CASs 25-23-22 and 30-45-01. No contaminants were identified at CAS 25-34-06, and no corrective action is necessary. Potential source material in the form of lead plate, lead-acid batteries, and oil within an abandoned transformer were identified at CAS 30-45-01, and corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of removing the PSM. Use restrictions and warning signs were implemented for the remaining radiological contamination at CASs 25-23-22 and 30-45-01. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 375; (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 375; and (3) Move CAU 375 from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  15. Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 568. Area 3 Plutonium Dispersion Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Matthews, Patrick

    2015-08-01

    The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide the rationale for the recommendation of corrective action alternatives (CAAs) for the 14 CASs within CAU 568. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from April 2014 through May 2015, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 568: Area 3 Plutonium Dispersion Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the DQO process. The CAU 568 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated that the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, review of future and current operations at the 14 CASs, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, the following corrective actions are recommended for CAU 568: • No further action is the preferred corrective action for CASs 03-23-17, 03-23-22, 03-23-26. • Closure in place is the preferred corrective action for CAS 03-23-19; 03-45-01; the SE DCBs at CASs 03-23-20, 03-23-23, 03-23-31, 03-23-32, 03-23-33, and 03-23-34; and the Pascal-BHCA at CAS 03-23-31. • Clean closure is the preferred corrective action for CASs 03-08-04, 03-23-30, and 03-26-04; and the four well head covers at CASs 03-23-20, 03-23-23, 03-23-31, and 03-23-33.

  16. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 554: Area 23 Release Site Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Evenson, Grant

    2005-07-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit 554, Area 23 Release Site, located in Mercury at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (1996). Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 554 is comprised of one corrective action site (CAS): (1) CAS 23-02-08, USTs 23-115-1, 2, 3/Spill 530-90-002. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 554 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from January 18 through May 5, 2005, as set forth in the ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 554: Area 23 Release Site'' (NNSA/NSO, 2004) and Records of Technical Change No. 1 and No. 2. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: (1) Determine whether contaminants of concern are present. (2) If contaminants of concern are present, determine their nature and extent. (3) Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The CAU 554 dataset from the investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the dataset for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against preliminary action levels (PALs) established in the CAU 554 CAIP for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) benzo(a)pyrene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and trichloroethene (TCE). Specifically: (1) The soil beneath and laterally outward from former underground storage tanks at CAS 23-02-08 contains TPH-diesel-range organics (DRO) above the PAL of 100 milligrams per kilogram, confined vertically from a depth of approximately 400 feet (ft) below ground surface (bgs). The contamination is confined to 12.5 ft bgs to the subsurface media and laterally within approximately 100 ft of the release. (2) A single soil sample collected from the depth of 99 to 100 ft bgs demonstrated the presence of TCE at a concentration above the PAL. (3) Two soil samples collected from depths of 198 to 199 ft bgs and 380 to 382 ft bgs demonstrated the presence of benzo(a)pyrene at a concentration above the PAL. (4) Two soil samples collected from depths of 240 to 241 ft bgs and 290 to 291 ft bgs demonstrated the presence of dibenz(a,h)anthracene at a concentration above the PAL. Tier 2 final action levels (FALs) were then calculated for these contaminants. The Tier 2 FALs for TCE, benzo(a)pyrene, and dibenz(a,h)anthracene were calculated based on a limited exposure to subsurface contamination scenario, and the Tier 2 FAL for TPH-DRO was established as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goal values for the individual hazardous constituents of diesel. The evaluation of TPH-DRO, benzo(a)pyrene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and TCE based on the Tier 2 FALs determined that no FALs were exceeded. Therefore, the DQO data needs were met, and it was determined that no corrective action (based on risk to human receptors) is necessary for the site. As a best management practice for the remaining subsurface diesel contamination present at the site, a use restriction was imposed on future site activities that would not allow for future contact of the subsurface contamination. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective action for CAU 554. (2) No Corrective Action Plan. (3) A Notice of Completion to the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 554. (4) Corrective Action Unit 554 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order.

  17. EM Quality Assurance Policy, Revision 0 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Policy, Revision 0 EM Quality Assurance Policy, Revision 0 Previous EM policy on the use of the corporate Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Rev. 0). This document has been superseded by Revision 1 of the policy, but is still in use at some EM sites. PDF icon EM Quality Assurance Policy, Revision 0 More Documents & Publications Line Management Understanding of QA and Oversight EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) QA Corporate Board Meeting - February 2010 (Teleconference)

  18. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 561: Waste Disposal Areas, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mark Krauss

    2011-08-01

    CAU 561 comprises 10 CASs: (1) 01-19-01, Waste Dump; (2) 02-08-02, Waste Dump and Burn Area; (3) 03-19-02, Debris Pile; (4) 05-62-01, Radioactive Gravel Pile; (5) 12-23-09, Radioactive Waste Dump; (6) 22-19-06, Buried Waste Disposal Site; (7) 23-21-04, Waste Disposal Trenches ; (8) 25-08-02, Waste Dump; (9) 25-23-21, Radioactive Waste Dump; and (10) 25-25-19, Hydrocarbon Stains and Trench. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 561 with no further corrective action. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the DQO process: (1) Determine whether COCs are present; (2) If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent; and (3) Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The following contaminants were determined to be present at concentrations exceeding their corresponding FALs: (1) No contamination exceeding FALs was identified at CASs 01-19-01, 03-19-02, 05-62-01, 12-23-09, and 22-19-06. (2) The surface and subsurface soil within the burn area at CAS 02-08-02 contains arsenic and lead above the FALs of 23 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and 800 mg/kg, respectively. The surface and subsurface soil within the burn area also contains melted lead slag (potential source material [PSM]). The soil within the waste piles contains polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) above the FALs. The contamination within the burn area is spread throughout the area, as it was not feasible to remove all the PSM (melted lead), while at the waste piles, the contamination is confined to the piles. (3) The surface and subsurface soils within Trenches 3 and 5 at CAS 23-21-04 contain arsenic and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) above the FALs of 23 mg/kg and 0.74 mg/kg, respectively. The soil was removed from both trenches, and the soil that remains at this CAS does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Lead bricks and counterweights were also removed, and the soil below these items does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. (4) The concrete-like material at CAS 25-08-02 contains arsenic above the FAL of 23 mg/kg. This concrete-like material was removed, and the soil that remains at this CAS does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Lead-acid batteries were also removed, and the soil below the batteries does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. (5) The surface soils within the main waste dump at the posted southern radioactive material area (RMA) at CAS 25-23-21 contain cesium (Cs)-137 and PCBs above the FALs of 72.9 picocuries per gram (pCi/g) and 0.74 mg/kg, respectively. The soil was removed from the RMA, and the soil that remains at this CAS does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. (6) The surface and subsurface soils at CAS 25-25-19 do not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. In addition, lead bricks were removed, and the soil below these items does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. The following best management practices were implemented: (1) Housekeeping debris at CASs 02-08-02, 23-21-04, 25-08-02, 25-23-21, and 25-25-19 was removed and disposed of; (2) The open trenches at CAS 23-21-04 were backfilled; (3) The waste piles at CAS 25-08-02 were removed and the area leveled to ground surface; and (4) The remaining waste piles at the main waste dump at CAS 25-23-21 were leveled to ground surface. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further action for CASs 01-19-01, 03-19-02, 05-62-01, 12-23-09, and 22-19-06; (2) Closure in place with an FFACO use restriction (UR) at CAS 02-08-02 for the remaining PAH-, arsenic-, and lead-contaminated soil, and the melted lead PSM. The UR form and map have been filed in the NNSA/NSO Facility Information Management System, the FFACO database, and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files; (3) No further corrective action at CAS 23-21-04, as the lead bricks and counterweights (PSM) have been removed, and the COCs of arsenic and PCBs in soil have be

  19. Environmental Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Documents Community Berkeley Global Campus Environmental Documents Tours Community Programs Friends of Berkeley Lab Navigate Section Community Berkeley Global...

  20. Quality Procedure - Document Control | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Control Quality Procedure - Document Control This procedure establishes the responsibilities and process for preparing, managing, and revising EM Headquarters Office of Standards and Quality Assurance controlled documents in accordance with EM-QA-001, Environmental Management Quality Assurance Program. PDF icon Quality Procedure - Document Control More Documents & Publications Quality Procedure - Supplier Qualification Quality Procedure - Approved Suppliers List Quality Procedure - Records

  1. DOCUMENT RELEASE FORM S (1) Document Number: RPP-RPT-42296

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    FORM S (1) Document Number: RPP-RPT-42296 (2) Revision Number: 0 (3) Effective Date: 04122010 (4) Document Type: EQ Digital Image El Hard copy (a) Number of pages (including the...

  2. Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 475.2A, Identifying Classified Information

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2014-03-06

    The revision will incorporate changes that were identified during the 1-year review after initial issuance

  3. Hawaii Revised Statute 182-6 Exploration | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hawaii Revised Statute 182-6 Exploration Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Hawaii Revised Statute 182-6...

  4. EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Previous revision of the Environmental Management Quality Assurance Program. The program is the EM management system to ensure we"do work correctly." This document has been superseded by Revision 1...

  5. 2016 Information Repository Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    6 Information Repository Documents WIPP Annual Waste Minimization Report Class 1* Permit Modifications and NMED Responses Class 1 and Class 1* Modifications WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit EPA I.D. Number NM4890139088-TSDF John E. Kieling/Hazardous Waste Bureau dated January 27, 2016 Class 1* Modification, requiring prior agency approval, seeking to Revise Closure Schedule Dates in Attachment G Class 1 Permit Modifications and NMED Responses Class 1 Permit Modification Notification to the

  6. Great Lakes water quality initiative criteria documents for the protection of wildlife (proposed): DDT, mercury 2,3,7,8-TCDD and PCBs

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bradbury, S.; Nolt, C.; Goodman, B.; Stromborg, K.; Sullivan, J.

    1993-04-01

    The document outlines, for each category of contaminant listed in the title, the relevant literature, the calculation of mammalian wildlife value, the calculation of Avian Wildlife Value, and the Great Lakes Wildlife criterion.

  7. Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc PDF icon Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc More Documents & Publications ADR Revised Policy ADR Policy Federal Register Document

  8. Document Reviews

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Document Reviews, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security information and document declassification efforts promote the release of information needed by an informed citizenry...

  9. Section 20320 of the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    20320 of the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution More Documents & Publications ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005 Energy Policy Act of 2005 Section 129 of the Consolidated...

  10. Major Process Revision of WP&C - Lessons Learned | Department...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Hazard AnalysisControl Subject Matter Expert Involvement Expectations for Workers Lessons Learned Major Process Revision of WP&C - Lessons Learned More Documents &...

  11. Control, Close-out, and Storage of Documentation

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    1 Revision 1 Effective June 2008 Control, Close-out, and Storage of Documentation Prepared ... proper methods for the control of records during and subsequent to testing activities. ...

  12. Uranium hexafluoride: A manual of good practice ORO 651 revision 6

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dyer, R.H.

    1991-12-31

    The United States Department of Energy publishes a document containing UF{sub 6} handling procedures and descriptions of the approved UF{sub 6} cylinders. Since its initial publication in 1966, it has been frequently revised to provide more and better information. The principle additions to the sixth revision which will be discussed are: (1) more detail on the physical and chemical properties of UF{sub 6}; (2) cold trap description and operation; (3) cylinder emptying and filling concepts; (4) basis for cylinder fill limits; (5) short- and long-term cylinder storage; and (6) cylinder photographs and drawings showing major dimensions.

  13. High Level Waste System Plan Revision 9

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Davis, N.R.; Wells, M.N.; Choi, A.S.; Paul, P.; Wise, F.E.

    1998-04-01

    Revision 9 of the High Level Waste System Plan documents the current operating strategy of the HLW System at SRS to receive, store, treat, and dispose of high-level waste.

  14. Other Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    since 2009 5 U.S.C. § 552 10 CFR 1004 Other Documents Transuranic Waste Defense Determination Approval Form

  15. WIPP Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Large file size alert This symbol means the document may be a large file size. Environmental Monitoring Documents about environmental monitoring at WIPP, including annual site environmental reports Environmental Protection Agency Certification Documents about WIPP's EPA certification Federal Regulations Standards and compliance criteria for WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Documents related to the state of New Mexico's oversight of WIPP under the authority of the Resource Conservation and

  16. Environmental Programs Procedure Preparation, Revision, Review, Approval,

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    and Use | Department of Energy Environmental Programs Procedure Preparation, Revision, Review, Approval, and Use Environmental Programs Procedure Preparation, Revision, Review, Approval, and Use The documents included in this listing are additional references not included in the Phase 2 Radiological Release at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Attachment F: Bibliography and References report. The documents were examined and used to develop the final report. PDF icon Environmental Programs

  17. Microsoft Word - CCP-TP-005-Revision 26

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    TP-005 Revision 26 CCP Acceptable Knowledge Documentation EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/12/2013 Mike Ramirez PRINTED NAME APPROVED FOR USE INFORMATION ONLY CCP-TP-005, Rev. 26 Effective Date: 08/12/2013 CCP Acceptable Knowledge Documentation Page 2 of 81 RECORD OF REVISION Revision Number Date Approved Description of Revision 4 01/17/2002 Revised to delete the requirement for signing the AK Summary and other minor changes. Added cis & trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene, Attachment 5. 5 01/24/2002 Minor change

  18. Revised (05/06)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 (Revised 03/12) Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Expires: General Information 1. Purpose Standard Remittance Advice (RA) form is a mandatory form designed to serve as the source document for entries into the Department's accounting records under Public Law 97-425 data from Purchasers concerning payment of their contribution to the Nuclear Waste Fund. 2. Who Shall Submit The RA must be submitted by Purchasers who signed the Standard Contract for Disposal of

  19. Untitled Document

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    689-Rev. 1 Nevada Environmental Restoration Project Site Characterization Work Plan for the Gnome-Coach Site, New Mexico Controlled Copy No.: Revision No.: 1 January 2002 Approved for public release; further dissemination is unlimited. U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office Environmental Restoration Division Available for public sale, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road

  20. Declassified Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Declassified Documents OpenNet provides easy, timely access to recently declassifed documents, including information declassifed in response to Freedom of Information Act requests. OpenNet also references older document collections from multiple DOE sources. OpenNet is updated regularly with new documents and information. www.osti.gov/opennet D E C L A S S I F I E D OpenNet makes information that is no longer classifed more readily available to the public, in support of the Open Government

  1. FTCP Corrective Action Plan - Revision 2 | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Corrective Action Plan - Revision 2 FTCP Corrective Action Plan - Revision 2 FTCP Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations PDF icon FTCP Corrective Action Plan Revision 2 More Documents & Publications FTCP Corrective Action

  2. Untitled Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    For questions on the Environmental Assessment for Conducting Astrophysics and Other Basic Science Experiments at the WIPP Site, email Harold.Johnson@ or call (505) 234-7349. Environmental Assessment for Conducting Astrophysics and Other Basic Science Experiments at the WIPP Site Final - January, 2001 This document has been provided to you in PDF format. Please install Adobe Acrobat Reader before accessing these documents. Cover Sheet, Table of Contents, List of Tables, List of Figures, and

  3. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Sloop, Christy

    2013-04-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 569 comprises the following nine corrective action sites (CASs): 03-23-09, T-3 Contamination Area 03-23-10, T-3A Contamination Area 03-23-11, T-3B Contamination Area 03-23-12, T-3S Contamination Area 03-23-13, T-3T Contamination Area 03-23-14, T-3V Contamination Area 03-23-15, S-3G Contamination Area 03-23-16, S-3H Contamination Area 03-23-21, Pike Contamination Area The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 569 based on the implementation of the corrective actions listed in Table ES-2.

  4. Title 43 CFR 1610.5-6 Revision | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    to library Legal Document- Federal RegulationFederal Regulation: Title 43 CFR 1610.5-6 RevisionLegal Abstract 1610.5-6 Revision under Title 43: Public Lands: Interior of...

  5. Paducah Public Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Outreach » Paducah Public Documents Paducah Public Documents Paducah Key Regulatory Documents Paducah Federal Facility Agreement - The Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) governs the corrective action/response action process from site investigation through site remediation as agreed to by DOE, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Kentucky under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; Kentucky Revised Statute

  6. Paducah Public Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Community Outreach » Paducah Public Documents Paducah Public Documents Paducah Key Regulatory Documents Paducah Federal Facility Agreement - The Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) governs the corrective action/response action process from site investigation through site remediation as agreed to by DOE, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Kentucky under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; Kentucky Revised

  7. System Plan Revision 5 + 6

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Plan Revision 7 General Overview DaBrisha Smith (DOE/ORP) April 10, 2013 System Plan 101 * What is System Planning - A process used by organizations to design, analyze and define future operations possible outcomes. * What is the RRP System Plan - A summary-level document that describes how the technical, cost, and schedule operating scenario (Baseline Case) is integrated to meet the mission demands. - Describes how the RPP mission could be achieved based on a set of assumptions for each

  8. Clean Air Act. Revision 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-02-15

    This Reference Book contains a current copy of the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those regulations that implement the statute and appear to be most relevant to DOE activities. The document is provided to DOE and contractor staff for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. This Reference Book has been completely revised and is current through February 15, 1994.

  9. Part III - List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Updated 9/30/15 to Mod 0588 Contract No. DE-AC04-94AL85000 Modification No. M202 Section J - Page 1 Part III - List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments Section J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Document Appendix A - Personnel Appendix (Revised RAs 1-12 and Mods M0541, M0558) Appendix B - Statement of Work (Revised M244, M264) Appendix C - Special Bank Account Agreement (Revised M248, M271, M461, M497, M508) Appendix D - Key Personnel (Revised M216, M224, M227, M229, M233, M252, M257, M272, M275,

  10. Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization. Revision 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cushing, C.E.

    1992-12-01

    This fifth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Information is presented on climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels, prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. Models are described that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. Federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable for the NEPA documents at the Hanford Site, are provided.

  11. SCADA Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Documents - Sandia Energy Energy Search Icon Sandia Home Locations Contact Us Employee Locator Energy & Climate Secure & Sustainable Energy Future Stationary Power Energy Conversion Efficiency Solar Energy Wind Energy Water Power Supercritical CO2 Geothermal Natural Gas Safety, Security & Resilience of the Energy Infrastructure Energy Storage Nuclear Power & Engineering Grid Modernization Battery Testing Nuclear Fuel Cycle Defense Waste Management Programs Advanced Nuclear Energy

  12. Presidential Documents

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    425 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2014 / Presidential Documents Executive Order 13690 of January 30, 2015 Establishing a Federal Flood Risk Management Standard and a Process for Further Soliciting and Considering Stakeholder Input By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to improve the Nation's resilience to current and future flood risk, I hereby direct the following: Section 1.

  13. Ehron Documents

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Ehron Documents 1993 S-F-1325.12 CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL FORM (11-90) OFFICE OF THE EXECLTIVE SECRETARIAT ACTIVITY ADD DO NOT DETACH FROM ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE 01/19/93 10:17 SOURCE CODE pM PUBLIC MAIL SPEC INT: _ CONTROL N( S93-000578 DATE CORR: 01/13/93 DATERECD: 01/19/93 DATECNTRL: 01/19/93 -DATE DUE: LETTER: MEMO: TWX: _OTHER: MOTION TO:SECY: X DEPSEC: UN SEC: OTHER: ROM:FLOWERS,G PATRICK TX O REMARKS: ENRON CORP. UB J : LEGAL -=--_- LITIGATION FOR USE fY ACT N OFFICE ONLY MOTION FOR LEAVE

  14. Enron Documents

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    6 ,. OFC OU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET IMPORTANT ES NUMBER:- ES96-000274 EXTERNAL kTE OF DOC: 12/28/95 REC'D: 01/04/96 CONTROLLED: 01/04/96 DUE: 01/26/96 FROM: I HAVE A DREAM NOTE REA: SUBJECT INFORMS SECRETARY THAT ENRON SUMMARY: GORP HAS MADE A CONTRIBUTION TO "I HAVE A DREAM - HOUSTON" IN THE SECRETARY HONOR SOURCE: PUBLIC MAIL DOCUMENT TYPE: LETTER ADDRESSED TO: SECRETARY FOR SIGNATURE OF: SECRETARY ACTION TO: OFFICE OF

  15. NEPA Documentation

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Note for: Cynthia Quarterman Keith Harper From: Carol Borgstrom Subject: NEPA Documentation Date: December 3, 2008 Attached, per your request, are two lists: (1) DOE environmental assessments (EAs) issued since 12/1/2006 and (2) DOE environmental impact statements (EISs) issued since 12/1/2006. Also, per your request, is a copy of a general NEPA briefing provided to the Acting Deputy Secretary in May 2008. Please let me know if you have any further questions (carol.borgstrom @hq.doe.gov;

  16. AFFECTED DOCUMENT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ADMIN RCD _ COMM REF _ RESPONSE TRACKING INFORMAnON I lOWED BY: (ORG) I TARGET DATE I I I CLOSING CCN COMPL. DATE I I CLOSING REF I I lOWED BY: (ORG) I I I I I TARGET DATE I CLOSING CCN COMPL DATE CLOSING REF TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION (TSD) BACKFIT (Documents dated prior to 1 November 1988) FUSRAP COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION DOEIORO TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION (CE-53) BECHTEL NATIONAl.. INC. - JOB 14501 AI$Wl E.e... COMM DATE b~5i=-'/T-'-I'''' ADDR CODE I I I I CLOSES CCN WBS 1/~ .. :2 O~

  17. AFFECTED DOCUMENT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    rr-osams ADMIN RCD _ RESPONSE TRACKING INFORMATION I 'OWED BY: (ORG) I TARGET DATE { I CLOSING CCN COMPL. DATE { CLOSING REF I I lOWED BY: (ORG) { { I { { TARGET DATE I CLOSING CCN COMPL DATE CLOSING REF TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION (TSD) BACKFIT (Documents dated prior to 1 November 1988) FUSRAP COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION DOEIORO TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION (CE*53) BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC. -JOB 14501 _-....Iome....:.-R..%.JI&~S::....:::S.::...- TO_---.,!5~Z~IJ~u..~ COMM DATE &6 tlJ t.e

  18. EA-1707: Revised Draft Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    07: Revised Draft Environmental Assessment EA-1707: Revised Draft Environmental Assessment Closure of Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill and Solid Waste Landfill, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal of DOE activities associated with the closure of Hanford's Site Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill. PDF icon EA-1707_FactSheet_1.pdf PDF icon EA-1707_Revised_Predecisional_Draft_EA.pdf PDF icon EA-1707_Appendix_1.pdf More Documents

  19. HNF-53665 Revision 0 Steelhead Redd Monitoring Report for

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    665 Revision 0 Steelhead Redd Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2012 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 P.O. Box 650 Richland, Washington 99352 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-53665 Revision 0 This page intentionally left blank. HNF-53665 Revision 0 Steelhead Redd Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2012 Document Type: RPT

  20. Audit/Investigative Records Schedule (Revision 2) | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Audit/Investigative Records Schedule (Revision 2) Audit/Investigative Records Schedule (Revision 2) This schedule covers both records associated with investigations other than those performed by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) as well as records created by the Department's OIG investigations. PDF icon Audit/Investigative Records Schedule (Revision 2) More Documents & Publications Audit/Investigation Records ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 18: SECURITY, EMERGENCY PLANNING, AND

  1. ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 4: PROPERTY DISPOSAL RECORDS (Revision 2) |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 4: PROPERTY DISPOSAL RECORDS (Revision 2) ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 4: PROPERTY DISPOSAL RECORDS (Revision 2) These records pertain to the sales by agencies of real and personal property surplus to the needs of the Government. PDF icon ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 4: PROPERTY DISPOSAL RECORDS (Revision 2) More Documents & Publications PROPERTY DISPOSAL RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS: PROCUREMENT, SUPPLY, AND GRANT RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 3:

  2. Enron Documents

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    8 :. Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:10 PM Profile Page: 1 Folder Profile Control # 1998000752 Name letter to the Deputy Secretary from the Northeast States for Priority Important Folder Trigger Letter DOE Addressee Source PM-0 Elizabeth Moler I ___I |_______________ Correspondence Date 1/16/98 Subject Text e RE:AIR POLLUTION IMPACTS OF RIDS Information ead of Agency INCREASED DEREGULATION IN THE J ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY: AN INITIAL Sensitivity Not Applicable ANALYSIS - 1115/98 l Classification None

  3. Untitled Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Contact-Handled Bay Waste Related Volatile Organics Monitoring History On January 1, 2007, the WIPP initiated monitoring for volatile organic compounds in the air around contact-handled transuranic waste shipping containers as they are unloaded for disposal. These results will be updated quarterly. Analytes of Interest Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA) Current instruments in use Photovac Voyager field Gas Chromatographs with electron capture detectors Limits of

  4. Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 7

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cushing, C.E. ed.; Baker, D.A.; Chamness, M.A. and others

    1995-09-01

    This seventh revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes up-to-date information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, environmental monitoring, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. More detailed data are available from reference sources cited or from the authors. Chapter 5.0 was not updated from the sixth revision (1994). It describes models, including their principal underlying assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. The updated Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE Orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site, following the structure of Chapter 4.0. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be used directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the Hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

  5. Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 6

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cushing, C.E.; Baker, D.A.; Chamness, M.A.

    1994-08-01

    This sixth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes up-to-date information on climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. More detailed data are available from reference sources cited or from the authors; Chapter 5.0 has been significantly updated from the fifth revision. It describes models, including their principal underlying assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions; The updated Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site, following the structure of Chapter 4.0. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be utilized directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the Hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

  6. Instructions for the Supporting Statement - Revision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the Supporting Statement - Revision Instructions for the Supporting Statement - Revision PDF icon Instructions for the Supporting Statementrev-includes BH table.pdf More Documents & Publications Paperwork Reduction Act Submission (OMB 83-I) Supporting Statement: OE Recovery Act Financial Assistance Grants OMB Control Number 1910-5149

  7. ARM - Conference Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    govPublicationsConference Documents Publications Journal Articles Conference Documents Program Documents Technical Reports Publications Database Public Information Materials Image...

  8. Microsoft Word - AL2005-05Revised.doc | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AL2005-05Revised.doc Microsoft Word - AL2005-05Revised.doc PDF icon Microsoft Word - AL2005-05Revised.doc More Documents & Publications AL2007-03.doc&#0; 2011-31 Attachment Aquisition Letter AcqGuide38pt1.doc&#0;

  9. A:\CHAP05PERFASSM(REVISED).PDF | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    A:\CHAP05PERFASSM(REVISED).PDF&#0; A:\CHAP05PERFASSM(REVISED).PDF&#0; PDF icon A:\CHAP05PERFASSM(REVISED).PDF&#0; More Documents & Publications CHAPTER 7 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Microsoft Word - Appendix A_2006_Jun Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts

  10. Microsoft Word - CHAP02ESH _REVISED1_3.doc | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CHAP02ESH _REVISED1_3.doc Microsoft Word - CHAP02ESH _REVISED1_3.doc PDF icon Microsoft Word - CHAP02ESH _REVISED1_3.doc More Documents & Publications Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts Regulatory Aspects of ISM COMMENTS&#0;

  11. BTO Publishes Two Important BEM Documents

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This week, BTO published two important and related documents regarding its BEM program. The first is the final revision of the BTO multi-year program plan (MYPP). In conjunction with the MYPP, BTO also published a set of program logic models that trace BTO activities to outputs and market outcomes.

  12. Microsoft Word - CCP-QP-002-Revision 39

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CCP-QP-002 Revision 39 CCP Training and Qualification Plan EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/14/2015 Mike Ramirez PRINTED NAME APPROVED FOR USE INFORMATION ONLY CCP-QP-002, Rev. 39 Effective Date: 04/14/2015 CCP Training and Qualification Plan Page 2 of 42 RECORD OF REVISION Revision Number Date Approved Description of Revision 9 02/20/2002 Major rewrite to streamline and create a more concise procedure. Document reduced from 57 pages to 16 pages. 10 06/05/2002 Added References. Changes to CCP Technical

  13. Cray XE Documentation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Cray XE Documentation Cray XE Documentation Last edited: 2014-01-22 15:12:50

  14. A:\ZAPPENDA1Matrix(FAR)(REVISED).PDF | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    A:\ZAPPENDA1Matrix(FAR)(REVISED).PDF&#0; A:\ZAPPENDA1Matrix(FAR)(REVISED).PDF&#0; PDF icon A:\ZAPPENDA1Matrix(FAR)(REVISED).PDF&#0; More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - Appendix A_2006_Jun A:\ZAPPENDA3Matrix(DOEandOther)(REVISED).PDF&#0; Acquisition Guide Chapter 1.0 - Acquisition Regulations System

  15. Revised Interpretation of the Applicability of the Davis-Bacon Act |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Revised Interpretation of the Applicability of the Davis-Bacon Act Revised Interpretation of the Applicability of the Davis-Bacon Act Revised analysis of the applicability of the Davis-Bacon Act requirements to activities funding in whole or in part by the Smart Grid Investment Grant project under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. PDF icon Revised Interpretation of the Applicability of the Davis-Bacon Act More Documents & Publications Davis Bacon Act

  16. General statement of policy and procedures for NRC enforcement actions: Enforcement policy. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-05-01

    This document includes the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s (NRC`s or Commission`s) revised General Statement of Policy and Procedure for Enforcement Actions (Enforcement Policy) as it was published in the Federal Register on May 13, 1998 (63 ER 26630). The Enforcement Policy is a general statement of policy explaining the NRC`s policies and procedures in initiating enforcement actions, and of the presiding officers and the Commission in reviewing these actions. This policy statement is applicable to enforcement matters involving the radiological health and safety of the public, including employees` health and safety, the common defense and security, and the environment.

  17. Golden Reading Room: Office of Acquisition Documents, Better...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Freedom of Information Act Amendment of 1996. Most documents are available in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF). DE-SOL-0005538 Better Buildings Initiative...

  18. Revenue Requirements Model (RRM) documentation. Final report (Revised)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1985-02-01

    The Revenue Requirements Model (RRM) is designed to estimate the impact of various regulatory and economic policy variables on the total revenue requirements of electric utilities. The RRM is built to utilize financial data extracted from the Standard and Poor's (S and P) Compustat II Utility data base (a proprietary data base). The RRM uses a simplified regulatory accounting framework to estimate the cost of service of the electric operations of utilities. The RRM is written in SAS, a proprietary software system. The RRM produces a series of reports including a summary of key data utilized therein, an income statement, revenue requirements, and selected key financial measures. Each report includes estimates for a base case and a hypothetical case. 4 figures, 6 tables.

  19. WIPP Documents - All documents by number

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Note: Documents that do not have document numbers are not included in this listing. Large file size alert This symbol means the document may be a large file size. All documents by number Common document prefixes DOE/CAO DOE/TRU DOE/CBFO DOE/WIPP DOE/EA NM DOE/EIS Other DOE/CAO Back to top DOE/CAO 95-1095, Oct. 1995 Remote Handled Transuranic Waste Study This study was conducted to satisfy the requirements defined by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act and considered by DOE to be a prudent exercise in

  20. Dynamic reduction of dimensions of a document vector in a document search and retrieval system

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Jiao, Yu; Potok, Thomas E.

    2011-05-03

    The method and system of the invention involves processing each new document (20) coming into the system into a document vector (16), and creating a document vector with reduced dimensionality (17) for comparison with the data model (15) without recomputing the data model (15). These operations are carried out by a first computer (11) while a second computer (12) updates the data model (18), which can be comprised of an initial large group of documents (19) and is premised on the computing an initial data model (13, 14, 15) to provide a reference point for determining document vectors from documents processed from the data stream (20).

  1. NREL Job Task Analysis: Retrofit Installer Technician (Revised) |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Retrofit Installer Technician (Revised) NREL Job Task Analysis: Retrofit Installer Technician (Revised) A summary of job task analyses for the position of retrofit installer technician when conducting weatherization work on a residence. PDF icon retrofit_installer_jta_04112012.pdf More Documents & Publications NREL Job Task Analysis: Retrofit Installer Technician NREL Job Task Analysis: Energy Auditor Training Self-Assessment

  2. Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study (EWITS) (Revised) |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study (EWITS) (Revised) Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study (EWITS) (Revised) EWITS was designed to answer questions about technical issues related to a 20% wind energy scenario for electric demand in the Eastern Interconnection. PDF icon 47078.pdf More Documents & Publications Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study: Executive Summary and Project Overview Proceedings of the March 25-26, 2009 Conference

  3. Waste generation forecast for DOE-ORO`s Environmental Restoration OR-1 Project: FY 1995-FY 2002, September 1994 revision

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-12-01

    A comprehensive waste-forecasting task was initiated in FY 1991 to provide a consistent, documented estimate of the volumes of waste expected to be generated as a result of U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations (DOE-ORO) Environmental Restoration (ER) OR-1 Project activities. Continual changes in the scope and schedules for remedial action (RA) and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) activities have required that an integrated data base system be developed that can be easily revised to keep pace with changes and provide appropriate tabular and graphical output. The output can then be analyzed and used to drive planning assumptions for treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities. The results of this forecasting effort and a description of the data base developed to support it are provided herein. The initial waste-generation forecast results were compiled in November 1991. Since the initial forecast report, the forecast data have been revised annually. This report reflects revisions as of September 1994.

  4. SNF AGING SYSTEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    L.L. Swanson

    2005-04-06

    The purpose of this system description document (SDD) is to establish requirements that drive the design of the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) aging system and associated bases, which will allow the design effort to proceed. This SDD will be revised at strategic points as the design matures. This SDD identifies the requirements and describes the system design, as it currently exists, with emphasis on attributes of the design provided to meet the requirements. This SDD is an engineering tool for design control; accordingly, the primary audience and users are design engineers. This SDD is part of an iterative design process. It leads the design process with regard to the flow down of upper tier requirements onto the system. Knowledge of these requirements is essential in performing the design process. The SDD follows the design with regard to the description of the system. The description provided in the SDD reflects the current results of the design process. Throughout this SDD, the term aging cask applies to vertical site-specific casks and to horizontal aging modules. The term overpack is a vertical site-specific cask that contains a dual-purpose canister (DPC) or a disposable canister. Functional and operational requirements applicable to this system were obtained from ''Project Functional and Operational Requirements'' (F&OR) (Curry 2004 [DIRS 170557]). Other requirements that support the design process were taken from documents such as ''Project Design Criteria Document'' (PDC) (BSC 2004 [DES 171599]), ''Site Fire Hazards Analyses'' (BSC 2005 [DIRS 172174]), and ''Nuclear Safety Design Bases for License Application'' (BSC 2005 [DIRS 171512]). The documents address requirements in the ''Project Requirements Document'' (PRD) (Canori and Leitner 2003 [DIRS 166275]). This SDD includes several appendices. Appendix A is a Glossary; Appendix B is a list of key system charts, diagrams, drawings, lists and additional supporting information; and Appendix C is a list of procedures that will be used to operate the system.

  5. 2015 Information Repository Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NWP dated August 17, 2015 Update Figure C-1 Revise a Procedure Number in Table E-1 Editorial Change in Permit Part 4 Editorial Change in Attachment C3 Notification of Class 1...

  6. Microsoft Word - Document1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    RL-2011-85 Revision 0 Sampling and Analysis Plan: Evaluation of Natural Beryllium and Its Ratio to Other Metals in Background Hanford Surface Soils Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited DOE/RL-2011-85 Revision 0 Sampling and Analysis Plan: Evaluation of Natural Beryllium and Its Ratio to Other Metals in Background Hanford Surface Soils Date

  7. Documents - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    regarding Hanford's previous mission of plutonium production. Posting every document dating back to 1943 on this website would be unrealistic. However, certain documents are...

  8. Microsoft Word - Final DOE CBFO 98-3103 Revision 3.docx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    CBFO 98-3103 TRU Waste Transportation Plan Revision 3 Effective Date: October 2012 This document supersedes DOE/CBFO 98-3103, Revision 2 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office DOE/CBFO 98-3103 Revision 3 2 This document has been submitted as required to: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (865) 576-8401 Additional information about this document may be obtained by calling 1-800-336-9477. Unlimited, publicly available

  9. Southface Energy Institute: Advanced Commercial Buildings Initiative...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Southface Energy Institute: Advanced Commercial Buildings Initiative Southface Energy Institute: ... More Documents & Publications Georgia and Arkansas Residential Energy Code ...

  10. Innovative Manufacturing Initiative Recognition Day, Advanced...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    More Documents & Publications Innovative Manufacturing Initiative Recognition Day Advanced Manufacturing Office Overview Unlocking the Potential of Additive Manufacturing in the ...

  11. Document | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Document Document Extracted Pages PDF icon Document More Documents & Publications EIS-0396: Advance Notice of Intent o Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0396: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Meeting Minutes: February 20-21, 2007

  12. Golden Reading Room: Office of Acquisition Documents, Better Buildings

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Initiative Support Services | Department of Energy Better Buildings Initiative Support Services Golden Reading Room: Office of Acquisition Documents, Better Buildings Initiative Support Services Below are electronic versions of Golden Field Office Reading Room documents that were created after November 1, 1996, per the requirements of the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendment of 1996. Most documents are available in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF). DE-SOL-0005538

  13. Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Part 1021 | Department of Energy Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR Part 1021 Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR Part 1021 Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR Part 1021 PDF icon CX rulemaking files More Documents & Publications Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period Notice of Final Rulemaking Notice of proposed rulemaking and public hearing

  14. Attachment 2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green Lease Text

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    | Department of Energy 2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green Lease Text Attachment 2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green Lease Text PDF icon Solicitation for Offers Paragraphs with New and Revised Green Lease Text More Documents & Publications Attachment 1: Green Lease Policies and Procedures for Lease Acquisition Attachment 4: Unrevised SFO Paragraphs Reissued Green Lease Policies and Procedures for Lease Acquisition

  15. Microsoft PowerPoint - 13 DOE PM Workshop UPF Presentation revised - Harry

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Peters [Compatibility Mode] | Department of Energy 3 DOE PM Workshop UPF Presentation revised - Harry Peters [Compatibility Mode] Microsoft PowerPoint - 13 DOE PM Workshop UPF Presentation revised - Harry Peters [Compatibility Mode] PDF icon Microsoft PowerPoint - 13 DOE PM Workshop UPF Presentation revised - Harry Peters [Compatibility Mode] More Documents & Publications The Process, Methods and Tool Used To Integrate Safety During Design of a Category 2 Nuclear Facility Independent

  16. Last Revision Date: 8/16/2010 Last Merged Filing ID:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Revision Date: 8/16/2010 Last Merged Filing ID: Tariffs, Rate Schedules, and Other Tariff Documents Southwestern Power Administration Tariffs, Rate Schedules, and Other Tariff Documents Document Generated On: 10/1/2010 Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................1 PREAMBLE: AUTHORITIES AND OBLIGATIONS

  17. HNF-37489-FP Revision

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    37489-FP Revision 0 Project Hanford Management Contractor foc the US. Deparbnsnt of Energy under Contract DE-ACO6-96RL13200 FLUOR, P.O. Box 1000 Richland, Washington Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-I 189-2008, Appendix A HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-1189- 2008, Appendix A S. K. Omberg Fluor Government Group Date Published April 2008 To Be Presented at The Nuclear Renaissanm. Safety Analysls for the New Nuclear Age

  18. Clean Cities Annual Metrics Report 2009 (Revised)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Johnson, C.

    2011-08-01

    Document provides Clean Cities coalition metrics about the use of alternative fuels; the deployment of alternative fuel vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and idle reduction initiatives; fuel economy activities; and programs to reduce vehicle miles driven.

  19. WIPP RCRA Documents menu

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    RCRA Documents Menu Permit Modifications Available for Public Comment Final Documents Draft Documents None currently available RCRA-Related Documents EEG Preliminary Comments on the Fundamental Bases of the Characterization Requirements for Disposal of Transuranic Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant and Findings and Recommendations of the Transuranic Waste Characterization Task Force Final Report EEG Response to NAS WIPP Committee Questions for May 19, 2003 Meeting Quality Assurance Program

  20. GTT Tranmission Workshop- Documents

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Use the links below to download documents from the GTT Transmission Workshop, held November 1-2, 2012.

  1. SPEAR3 | Technical Documentation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Technical Documentation Hardware Component Database: Mechanical Electrical Drawing shor tcuts BPM Development SSRL | SLAC | Stanford University | SSRL Computing | SLAC Computing...

  2. Classification Documents and Publications

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Certain documents and publications created or issued by the Office of Classification are available from this page.

  3. ARM - XDC Documentation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Documentation External Data Center Order Data Description of External Data Streams Data Viewers and Plots (selected data sets) XDC Documentation XDC Documentation BNL's ARM Related General Report The monthly reports on work done for the ARM Project. Description of External Data Streams Documentation of External Data-Streams includes sources, measurements, area, time-ranges, contacts, etc. External Projects Contacts Includes information on external projects covering ARM ACRF sites. Instructions

  4. Sandia Energy - SCADA Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Documents Home Stationary Power Safety, Security & Resilience of Energy Infrastructure Grid Modernization Cyber Security for Electric Infrastructure National Supervisory Control...

  5. ARM - Data Documentation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Documentation Policies, Plans, Descriptions Data Documentation Home Data Sharing and Distribution Policy Data Management and Documentation Plan Data Product Registration and Submission Statement on Digital Data Management Guidelines for Integrating Data Products and Algorithms to ARM Data Libraries Reading netCDF and HDF Data Files Time in ARM netCDF Data Files Data Archive Documentation ARM Archive's Catalog of Data Streams (Updated monthly) Access to Historical ARM Data More on Understanding

  6. ATVM GOVERNING DOCUMENTS

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Enclosed find a list of documents that make up the statutory and regulatory framework for the ATVM direct loan program.

  7. Revised Manuscript May

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Revised Manuscript May 20, 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A 3 J.E. Purcell a,b , J.H. Kelley a,c , E. Kwan a,d , C.G. Sheu a,d and H.R. Weller a,d a Triangle Universities ...

  8. Revised Manuscript May

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Revised Manuscript May 29, 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A 3 D.R. Tilley a,b , H.R. Weller a,c and H.H. Hasan a,c a Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, NC ...

  9. Corel Office Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Effective Date 08/03/2010 WP 08-PT.08 Revision 6 WIPP Centralized Procurement Program Plan Cognizant Section: Packaging Approved by: Todd Sellmer Working Copy WIPP Centralized Procurement Program Plan WP 08-PT.08, Rev. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................ iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose

  10. Office of Document Reviews

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Document Reviews ensures that all documents prepared at DOE Headquarters are properly marked to identify the level and category of protected information they contain (if any) and to ensure that all documents the Department prepares or is required to review under applicable statutes for public release contain no information requiring protection under law, regulations and Executive orders.

  11. Decommissioning Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Documents Decommissioning Documents PDF icon Decommissioning Documents More Documents & Publications Decommissioning Benchmarking Study Final Report Decommissioning Handbook dg_appendices.pdf

  12. Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines, Revised August 12, 2010 | Department

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    of Energy Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines PDF icon Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines, Revised August 12, 2010 More Documents & Publications Forrestal Garage Parking Procedures Parking Permit Application, Form HQ F 1400.12 DOE HQ F 1400.12

  13. BTO Publishes Two Important Building Energy Modeling Documents

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This week, BTO published two important and related documents regarding its Building Energy Modeling (BEM) program. The first is the final revision of the BTO multi-year program plan (MYPP). In conjunction with the MYPP, BTO also published a set of program logic models that trace BTO activities to outputs and market outcomes.

  14. Document Flowdown Tool

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2010-12-31

    DFTool performs the following: ? A tool to conduct, capture, document, and manage a systematic review and flowdown of contractual requirements/documents to the site, facility, and project-level implementing documents. ? Ability to alert/email document owners to impending changes/updates and impacts to upper-level linked documents. ? Custom ability to generate reports and/or include custom functionalities based on other needs or consideration for site use. ? Ability to be accessed by all personnel (particularly document owners). ? Shows both document flow-up and flow-down. ? Provides visibility where links/flowdown does not currently exist or is incorrect so it can be changed/updated (no visibility currently exists). ? Ability to capture requirements and ultimately link to an existing/proven requirements-based commitment tracking system which can be used (electively) at the facility/organizational-level

  15. Document Flowdown Tool

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    2010-12-31

    DFTool performs the following: • A tool to conduct, capture, document, and manage a systematic review and flowdown of contractual requirements/documents to the site, facility, and project-level implementing documents. • Ability to alert/email document owners to impending changes/updates and impacts to upper-level linked documents. • Custom ability to generate reports and/or include custom functionalities based on other needs or consideration for site use. • Ability to be accessed by all personnel (particularly document owners). •more » Shows both document flow-up and flow-down. • Provides visibility where links/flowdown does not currently exist or is incorrect so it can be changed/updated (no visibility currently exists). • Ability to capture requirements and ultimately link to an existing/proven requirements-based commitment tracking system which can be used (electively) at the facility/organizational-level« less

  16. Microsoft PowerPoint - 12 Holman White PM Conference 2010 Rev 2 revised |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 2 Holman White PM Conference 2010 Rev 2 revised Microsoft PowerPoint - 12 Holman White PM Conference 2010 Rev 2 revised PDF icon Microsoft PowerPoint - 12 Holman White PM Conference 2010 Rev 2 revised More Documents & Publications Microsoft PowerPoint - 5.3 Item 01 Top Kill Operation Status 09 June 1400.pptx Microsoft PowerPoint - Enterprise Top Hat Phases - 07-04-2010.pptx Microsoft PowerPoint - 14 Simpson Bosco final PM Workshop Simpson Mar09_2010 revised

  17. Postdoctoral Initial Discussion Form | Argonne National Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Initial Discussion Form This form outlines initial goals and clarifies expectations between a postdoc and his/her supervisor for a successful and productive relationship. Microsoft Office document icon Postdoctoral Initial Discussion Form.doc

  18. Tank Waste Remediation System Projects Document Control Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Slater, G.D.; Halverson, T.G.

    1994-09-30

    The purpose of this Tank Waste Remediation System Projects Document Control Plan is to provide requirements and responsibilities for document control for the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant (HWVP) Project and the Initial Pretreatment Module (IPM) Project.

  19. Fig 9-revised Flowchart.xls

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Figure 9 Soil Nature and Extent AOI Identification Process d The PRG value for lead is not a calculated PRG, but rather is taken from the EPA guidance document Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Correction Action Facilities (1994). e For surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft), WRW surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft) PRGs are used. For subsurface soil (0.5 ft to a maximum depth of 209 ft), WRW subsurface soil (0.5 to 8 ft) PRGs are used. a Soil "superset" for soil samples collected

  20. TRUPACT-III Content Codes (TRUCON-III), Revision 2, July 2012

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    WIPP 11-3458 Rev. 2 TRUPACT-III CONTENT CODES (TRUCON-III) Revision 2 July 2012 This document supersedes DOE/WIPP 10-3458, Revision 1 DOE/WIPP 11-3458 Rev. 2 TRUPACT-III CONTENT CODES (TRUCON-III) Revision 2 July 2012 Approved by: [Signature on File] Date:_ 12 July 2012 _ J. R. Stroble, Director, Office of the National TRU Program DOE/WIPP 11-3458 Rev. 2, July 2012 3 This document has been submitted as required to: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information PO Box

  1. 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    November 2, 2007 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) is pleased to announce the release of the 2008 Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). This revision replaces the 2005 MERRTT CD-ROM set. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, the 2008 MERRTT has been sent to the Occupational, Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for review. The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary

  2. Bylaws and Other Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Bylaws and Other Documents Postdoc Association Bylaws Bylaws and information about rules of order, meeting conduct, and motions. Contact Postdoc Program Office Email How to go about properly conducting business at a General Assembly Meeting Refer to the postdoc bylaws and other documents, below, for information on how to go about properly conducting business at a LAPA General Assembly (GA) Meeting. The first two documents will be available on the tables at the GA meetings for reference: Bylaws

  3. Community impact documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Community impact documents Community impact documents Fact sheets, program summaries, and other documents provide insight into the Laboratory's community efforts and impact in Northern New Mexico. Contacts Kathy Keith Community Relations & Partnerships (505) 665-4400 Email Making a difference in Northern New Mexico Fact sheets by county Los Alamos (pdf) Rio Arriba (pdf) San Miguel and Mora (pdf) Santa Fe (pdf) Taos (pdf) General Community Commitment Plan (pdf) | Archive Community Leaders

  4. NETL DOCUMENT LIBRARY

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Library NETL Document Library You can search for documents by selecting the appropriate link with in the content section or use the Search feature below Coal Document Library In response to concerns of climate change, the United States is contemplating a complete and rapid transformation of the way it both produces and consumes energy to significantly reduce its carbon emissions. The integrated Coal Program focuses on retaining the benefits of continuing to use coal to produce electric power.

  5. CAPTURE DOCUMENT ORAUTEAM

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    DATA CAPTURE DOCUMENT ORAUTEAM ---- Dose Reconstruction ~v~:7 DISCOVERY AND REVIEW dA'~ Project for NIOSH The attached document may contain Privacy Act data. This information is protected by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. §552a; disclosure to any third party without written consent of the individual to whom the information pertains is strictly prohibited. Data Capture Team or Other ORAU Team Member Capturing Data: Complete all information that applies to the data/document being submitted lor

  6. Archived Publications and Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Archived Publications and Documents Print ALS 20-Year Roadmap, 2003 Presentations made to the BESAC subcommittee on the 20-Year BES Facilities Roadmap, with references and relevant...

  7. Plans, Updates, Regulatory Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Permit for Storm Water Documents Individual Permit NPDES No. NM0030759 (pdf) Storm Water Plans Site Discharge Pollution Prevention Plan (SDPPP) Volume 1 - Los AlamosPueblo...

  8. Portsmouth Remedial Actions Documents

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Remedial Action documents for the Portsmouth Site Process Buildings and Complex Facilities Decontamination and Decommissioning Decision Portsmouth Site Site-Wide Waste Disposition Decision

  9. Hazard Baseline Documentation

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1995-12-04

    This standard establishes uniform Office of Environmental Management (EM) guidance on hazard baseline documents that identify and control radiological and non-radiological hazards for all EM facilities.

  10. ARM - Program Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Videos Publication Resources Submit a Publication Publishing Procedures ARM Style Guide (PDF, 448KB) Acronyms Glossary Logos Contacts RSS for Publications Program Documents Annual...

  11. Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Documents Memorandum from Secretary Moniz on the Freedom of Information Act (PDF) Agency Improvement Plan (PDF) FOIA Backlog Reduction Goals for Fiscal Years 2008, 2009, and 2010...

  12. Enron Documents 1993 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    3 Enron Documents 1993 Enron Documents 1993. enron1993.pdf PDF icon Enron Documents 1993 More Documents & Publications FOIA - Enron Documents Enron Documents 1998 Enron Documents 1996

  13. Enron Documents 1996 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    6 Enron Documents 1996 Enron Documents 1996 PDF icon Enron Documents 1996 More Documents & Publications Enron Documents 2000 FOIA - Enron Documents Enron Documents 2001

  14. Enron Documents 1998 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    8 Enron Documents 1998 Enron Documents 1998 PDF icon Enron Documents 1998 More Documents & Publications FOIA - Enron Documents Enron Documents 1993 Enron Documents 1996

  15. Appendix A: Conceptual Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NREL-Research Support Facilities TABLE OF CONTENTS Solicitation No. RFJ-8-77550 Appendix A: Conceptual Documents Page 1 of 299 February 6, 2008 Appendix A CONCEPTUAL DOCUMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 2 PART 1-PROCEDURES .......................................................................................................... 3 PART 2-PROGRAM

  16. Cray XT Documentation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Cray XT Documentation Cray XT Documentation &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; Last edited: 2011-04-06 11:35:53

  17. Hanford Site National Evnironmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 4

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cushing, C.E.

    1991-12-01

    This fourth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. In Chapter 4.0 are presented summations of up-to-date information about climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels. Chapter 5.0 describes models, including their principal assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclides transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable for environmental impact statements for the Hanford Site, following the structure Chapter 4.0. NO conclusions or recommendations are given in this report.

  18. WIPP Documents - All documents by title

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    All documents by title A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 40 CFR Part 191 Environmental radiation protection standards for management and disposal of spent nuclear fuel, high-level and transuranic radioactive wastes. 40 CFR Part 194 Criteria for the certification and re-certification of theWaste Isolation Pilot Plant's compliance with the 40 CFR Part 191 disposal regulations. A Back to top Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure The Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office's

  19. Documentation - Laboratory for Laser Energetics

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    LLE Cleanroom Procedures and Protocol M-CC-P-001 Visual Inspection Using High Intensity White Light M-CC-P-002 Visual Inspection Using High Intensity Black Light M-CC-P-003 GCC Entering and Exiting Protocol for Initial Installation M-CC-P-004 OMEGA EP Cleanroom Gowning/Degowning Procedure M-CC-P-005 GCC Oxidation Cleaning Procedure M-CC-P-006 LLE Precision Clean Process Comments Address document comments, questions, and corrections to Contamination Control Engineer. For additional information

  20. Sandia Energy - Reference Model Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Documents Home Stationary Power Energy Conversion Efficiency Water Power Reference Model Project (RMP) Reference Model Documents Reference Model DocumentsTara Camacho-Lopez2015-05-...

  1. Microsoft Word - Document1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    plans to lay off 24 LSU System proposed job reductions Furloughs set, vacant jobs cut * By JORDAN BLUM * Advocate Capitol News Bureau * Published: Jul 16, 2009 - Page: 1A The flagship LSU campus is only planning to lay off 24 employees because of state budget cuts to colleges. Another 176 vacant positions are also being axed, according to revised budget plans released Wednesday. The campus has almost 3,300 employees. But nearly half could face furloughs - mandatory time off without pay. The LSU

  2. Frequently Requested Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Frequently Requested Documents Frequently Requested Documents This is an index of frequently requested documents provided by the Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office. You must use the Adobe Acrobat file reader to read the files. If you do not have the reader you can download it free from http://get.adobe.com/reader/. FOIA Requests Received by DOE-ID in 2013 (pdf) May - ID-13-010301-F Workroom Vault Door (20:32) WMA Icon Workroom Door 67-59 (0:48) WMA Icon Door 1A SNM 61 (0:27) WMA Icon

  3. Microsoft Word - Document2

    Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

    09 D I S C L A I M E R This document was designed for the internal use of the United States Department of Energy. This document will be occasionally updated and, therefore, this copy may not reflect the most current version. This document was prepared as account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or

  4. Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization, Revision 15

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Neitzel, Duane A.; Bunn, Amoret L.; Burk, Kenneth W.; Cannon, Sandra D.; Duncan, Joanne P.; Fowler, Richard A.; Fritz, Brad G.; Harvey, David W.; Hendrickson, Paul L.; Horton, Duane G.; Last, George V.; Poston, Ted M.; Prendergast-Kennedy, Ellen L.; Reidel, Steve P.; Scott, Michael J.; Thorne, Paul D.; Woody, Dave M.

    2003-09-01

    This document describes the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site environment. It is updated each year and is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site environment for the many National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents being prepared by DOE contractors. No statements of significance or environmental consequences are provided. This year's report is the thirteenth revision of the original document published in 1988 and is (until replaced by the fourteenth revision) the only version that is relevant for use in the preparation of Hanford NEPA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) documents. The two chapters included in this document (Chapters 4 and 6) are numbered to correspond to the chapters where such information is typically presented in environmental impact statements (Weiss) and other Hanford Site NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes Hanford Site climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological, and historical resources, socioeconomics, occupational safety, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) describes federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and presidential executive orders that are applicable to the NEPA documents prepared for Hanford Site activities.

  5. Geochemistry Technical Basis Document

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Benedict, Jr, F Christopher; Rose, Timothy P; Thomas, James M; Waddell, Richard; Jacobson, Roger

    2004-03-18

    This document presents a methodology whereby geochemical data can more effectively contribute to the development , calibration, and verification of groundwater flow and slute transport models for the Underground Test Area (UGTA) Project.

  6. Controlled Document Tracking Software

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    1992-08-24

    MANTRACK is an automated, controlled document tracking system which does the following and reduces staff time required to perform these tasks: generates transmittal letters/receipts for every controlled copy issued (merged from a current distribution list), tracks the return of transmittal receipts, facilitates the check-in of the large number of transmittal receipts returned (using a barcode reader), generates a reminder list which prompts the cyclic review and evaluation of existing documents, generates overdue reminders for themore » return of past-due transmittal receipts, tracks the number of Procedure Change Directives (PCD) currently in effect for each procedure, generates and maintains current distribution lists for each document, generates a current table of contents when updates to the document (usually a procedure manual) are made.« less

  7. Document (17k)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    document.xml.rels &3; wordrelssettings.xml.rels &3; wordrels &3; worddocument.xml SAM PLE APPROVAL MEMORANDUM FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES ONLY (Updated 2-26-2013) (NOTE: Per...

  8. Appendix G Supporting Documentation

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Supporting Documentation for Focused Feasibility Study This page intentionally left blank Contents Section Ground Water Models for Alternatives 3 and 4 ........................................................................ G .O Human Health Risk Assessment Calculations ........................................................................... G2.0 Cost Analysis ........................................................................................................................... G3.0 This

  9. Development of Onsite Transportation Safety Documents for Nevada Test Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Frank Hand, Willard Thomas, Frank Sciacca, Manny Negrete, Susan Kelley

    2008-05-08

    Department of Energy (DOE) Orders require each DOE site to develop onsite transportation safety documents (OTSDs). The Nevada Test Site approach divided all onsite transfers into two groups with each group covered by a standalone OTSD identified as Non-Nuclear and Nuclear. The Non-Nuclear transfers involve all radioactive hazardous material in less than Hazard Category (HC)-3 quantities and all chemically hazardous materials. The Nuclear transfers involve all radioactive material equal to or greater than HC-3 quantities and radioactive material mated with high explosives regardless of quantity. Both OTSDs comply with DOE O 460.1B requirements. The Nuclear OTSD also complies with DOE O 461.1A requirements and includes a DOE-STD-3009 approach to hazard analysis (HA) and accident analysis as needed. All Nuclear OTSD proposed transfers were determined to be non-equivalent and a methodology was developed to determine if equivalent safety to a fully compliant Department of Transportation (DOT) transfer was achieved. For each HA scenario, three hypothetical transfers were evaluated: a DOT-compliant, uncontrolled, and controlled transfer. Equivalent safety is demonstrated when the risk level for each controlled transfer is equal to or less than the corresponding DOT-compliant transfer risk level. In this comparison the typical DOE-STD-3009 risk matrix was modified to reflect transportation requirements. Design basis conditions (DBCs) were developed for each non-equivalent transfer. Initial DBCs were based solely upon the amount of material present. Route-, transfer-, and site-specific conditions were evaluated and the initial DBCs revised as needed. Final DBCs were evaluated for each transfers packaging and its contents.

  10. Development of an energy-use estimation methodology for the revised Navy Manual MO-303

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Richman, E.E.; Keller, J.M.; Wood, A.G.; Dittmer, A.L.

    1995-01-01

    The U.S. Navy commissioned Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) to revise and/or update the Navy Utilities Targets Manual, NAVFAC MO-303 (U.S. Navy 1972b). The purpose of the project was to produce a current, applicable, and easy-to-use version of the manual for use by energy and facility engineers and staff at all Navy Public Works Centers (PWCs), Public Works Departments (PWDs), Engineering Field Divisions (EFDs), and other related organizations. The revision of the MO-303 manual involved developing a methodology for estimating energy consumption in buildings and ships. This methodology can account for, and equitably allocate, energy consumption within Navy installations. The analyses used to develop this methodology included developing end-use intensities (EUIs) from a vast collection of Navy base metering and billing data. A statistical analysis of the metering data, weather data, and building energy-use characteristics was used to develop appropriate EUI values for use at all Navy bases. A complete Navy base energy reconciliation process was also created for use in allocating all known energy consumption. Initial attempts to use total Navy base consumption values did not produce usable results. A parallel effort using individual building consumption data provided an estimating method that incorporated weather effects. This method produced a set of building EUI values and weather adjustments for use in estimating building energy use. A method of reconciling total site energy consumption was developed based on a {open_quotes}zero-sum{close_quotes} principle. This method provides a way to account for all energy use and apportion part or all of it to buildings and other energy uses when actual consumption is not known. The entire text of the manual was also revised to present a more easily read understood and usable document.

  11. Nevada Revised Statutes | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Not provided DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Nevada Revised Statutes Citation Nevada Revised Statutes (2014). Retrieved...

  12. Oregon Revised Statutes | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Not provided DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Oregon Revised Statutes Citation Oregon Revised Statutes (2014). Retrieved...

  13. Enron Documents 1995

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... The country's foreign reserves which reached 23 billion ... The partnerships forged, projects initiated and policy ... people of China and the United States. Thank you for serving. ...

  14. Hazard baseline documentation

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-08-01

    This DOE limited technical standard establishes uniform Office of Environmental Management (EM) guidance on hazards baseline documents that identify and control radiological and nonradiological hazards for all EM facilities. It provides a road map to the safety and health hazard identification and control requirements contained in the Department`s orders and provides EM guidance on the applicability and integration of these requirements. This includes a definition of four classes of facilities (nuclear, non-nuclear, radiological, and other industrial); the thresholds for facility hazard classification; and applicable safety and health hazard identification, controls, and documentation. The standard applies to the classification, development, review, and approval of hazard identification and control documentation for EM facilities.

  15. Petascale Initiative

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Petascale Initiative Alice Koniges (third from left) led the Computational Science and ... (OSF), NERSC's operations center and was led by principal investigator Alice Koniges. ...

  16. Projects & Initiatives

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Expand Finance & Rates Involvement & Outreach Expand Involvement & Outreach Doing Business Expand Doing Business Skip navigation links Initiatives Columbia River Treaty Non...

  17. Controlling OSHA PSM documentation

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Person, J.S. [Warren-Forthought, Inc., Angleton, TX (United States)

    1997-06-01

    At present, most companies in the hazardous materials process industries are knowledgeable in the requirements of the OSHA Process Safety Management (PSM) standard (29 CFR 1910.119), issued in May of 1992. The current question facing many of these companies is no longer ``How does one comply?`` but rather, ``What does one do with all the documentation generated from the OSHA PSM Standard?``. Using an Electronic Performance Support System (EPSS) for delivering and controlling OSHA PSM documentation will be discussed. This paper will address the important components of an EPSS and successful case studies.

  18. IXPUG ISC15 Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Training » IXPUG ISC15 Documents IXPUG ISC15 Documents Sort by: Default | Name | Date (low-high) | Date (high-low) | Source | Category BoF: IXPUG ISC15 BoF Introduction July 15, 2015 | Author(s): Thomas Steinke, ZIB | Download File: 1Welcome.pdf | pdf | 98 KB Workshop: Intel® Xeon Phi(tm) Processor "Knights Landing" Architectural Overview Author(s): Avinash Sodani, Senior Principal Engineer, Intel Corporation Chief Architect, Knights Landing Processor | Download File:

  19. Documents for Foreign Nationals

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Documents for Foreign Nationals Print All foreign nationals (non-U.S. citizens) intending to work at the ALS must ensure that they have all relevant travel and visa documents completed and approved before they will be permitted to work at Berkeley Lab. Owing to increased security measures, it is particularly important to begin the visa application process early in order to avoid delays that may result in lost beamtime, etc. NOTE: Researchers who are citizens of, or were born in, T4 countries

  20. Documents for Foreign Nationals

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Documents for Foreign Nationals Print All foreign nationals (non-U.S. citizens) intending to work at the ALS must ensure that they have all relevant travel and visa documents completed and approved before they will be permitted to work at Berkeley Lab. Owing to increased security measures, it is particularly important to begin the visa application process early in order to avoid delays that may result in lost beamtime, etc. NOTE: Researchers who are citizens of, or were born in, T4 countries

  1. Ultrafast Laser Diagnostics to Investigate Initiation in Energetic...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Ultrafast Laser Diagnostics to Investigate Initiation in Energetic Materials. Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Ultrafast Laser Diagnostics to Investigate Initiation in...

  2. Ultrafast laser diagnostics for studies of shock initiation in...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    for studies of shock initiation in energetic materials. Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Ultrafast laser diagnostics for studies of shock initiation in energetic ...

  3. Ultrafast Shock Initiation of Exothermic Chemistry in Hydrogen...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Shock Initiation of Exothermic Chemistry in Hydrogen Peroxide Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Ultrafast Shock Initiation of Exothermic Chemistry in Hydrogen Peroxide ...

  4. Initial Experimental Results of a Machine Learning-Based Temperature...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Initial Experimental Results of a Machine Learning-Based Temperature Control System for an RF Gun Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Initial Experimental Results of a...

  5. Ultrafast Shock Initiation of Exothermic Chemistry in Hydrogen...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Journal Article: Ultrafast Shock Initiation of Exothermic Chemistry in Hydrogen Peroxide Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Ultrafast Shock Initiation of Exothermic...

  6. Thermal initiation of explosive materials using photon-based...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Thermal initiation of explosive materials using photon-based active interrogation methods (u) Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Thermal initiation of explosive materials...

  7. Download the SunShot Initiative 2014 Portfolio | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    More Documents & Publications 2014 SunShot Initiative Portfolio Book: Tackling Challenges in Solar Energy 2014 SunShot Initiative Portfolio Book: Photovoltaics 2014 SunShot ...

  8. Download the SunShot Initiative 2014 Portfolio | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    More Documents & Publications 2014 SunShot Initiative Portfolio Book: Tackling Challenges in Solar Energy 2014 SunShot Initiative Portfolio Book: Photovoltaics Revitalizing ...

  9. Recovery Act: Clean Coal Power Initiative | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    A report detailling the Clean Coal Power initiative funded under the American Recovery and Renewal Act of 2009. Recovery Act: Clean Coal Power Initiative More Documents &...

  10. Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 9

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Neitzel, D.A.; Bjornstad, B.N.; Fosmire, C.J.

    1997-08-01

    This ninth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Chapters 4 and 6 in Hanford Site-related NEPA documents. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) includes information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological and historical resources, socioeconomics, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE directives and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site. Not all of the sections have been updated for this revision. The following lists the updated sections: climate and meteorology; ecology (threatened and endangered species section only); culture, archaeological, and historical resources; socioeconomics; all of Chapter 6.

  11. Document clustering methods, document cluster label disambiguation methods, document clustering apparatuses, and articles of manufacture

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Sanfilippo, Antonio (Richland, WA); Calapristi, Augustin J. (West Richland, WA); Crow, Vernon L. (Richland, WA); Hetzler, Elizabeth G. (Kennewick, WA); Turner, Alan E. (Kennewick, WA)

    2009-12-22

    Document clustering methods, document cluster label disambiguation methods, document clustering apparatuses, and articles of manufacture are described. In one aspect, a document clustering method includes providing a document set comprising a plurality of documents, providing a cluster comprising a subset of the documents of the document set, using a plurality of terms of the documents, providing a cluster label indicative of subject matter content of the documents of the cluster, wherein the cluster label comprises a plurality of word senses, and selecting one of the word senses of the cluster label.

  12. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Control modules -- Volume 1, Revision 4

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Landers, N.F.; Petrie, L.M.; Knight, J.R.

    1995-04-01

    SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. This manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for the functional module documentation, and Volume 3 for the documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

  13. Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Documents Memorandum from Secretary Moniz on the Freedom of Information Act (PDF) Agency Improvement Plan (PDF) FOIA Backlog Reduction Goals for Fiscal Years 2008, 2009, and 2010 (PDF) Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources (COMING SOON) Updated Report on Executive Order 13392 Implementation (PDF) Certification DOE Reading Rooms (pdf)

  14. 2014 SunShot Initiative Systems Integration Subprogram Overview...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PDF icon rangapitchumanisisubprogramoverviewsunshot2014.pdf More Documents & Publications 2014 SunShot Initiative Concentrating Solar Power Subprogram Overview Download the ...

  15. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Total natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2014 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and subdivision 12/31/13 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/14 Alaska 7,383 -25 268 690 167 195 146 0 0 305 6,805 Lower 48 States 346,611 4,930 55,060 53,654

  16. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Nonassociated natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2014 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and Subdivision 12/31/13 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/14 Alaska 955 -24 89 137 0 34 138 0 0 101 954 Lower 48 States 294,549 3,533 41,975 44,047

  17. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Associated-dissolved natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2014 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and Subdivision 12/31/13 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/14 Alaska 6,428 -1 179 553 167 161 8 0 0 204 5,851 Lower 48 States 52,062 1,397

  18. On June 21, 2011, the HASQARD Focus Group approved the following revision to Sec

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    June 21, 2011, the HASQARD Focus Group approved the following revision to Section 10 in Volume 1 of the HASQARD replacing the original Section 10 found in Revision 3 of HASQARD in its entirety: 10.0 ASSESSMENTS Assessments document how the organization determines the suitability and effectiveness of the implemented quality system and the performance of the programs to which the quality system applies. Assessments may be performed by agencies or groups that are not under the control of laboratory

  19. Parallel programming with PCN. Revision 2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Foster, I.; Tuecke, S.

    1993-01-01

    PCN is a system for developing and executing parallel programs. It comprises a high-level programming language, tools for developing and debugging programs in this language, and interfaces to Fortran and Cthat allow the reuse of existing code in multilingual parallel programs. Programs developed using PCN are portable across many different workstations, networks, and parallel computers. This document provides all the information required to develop parallel programs with the PCN programming system. It includes both tutorial and reference material. It also presents the basic concepts that underlie PCN, particularly where these are likely to be unfamiliar to the reader, and provides pointers to other documentation on the PCN language, programming techniques, and tools. PCN is in the public domain. The latest version of both the software and this manual can be obtained by anonymous ftp from Argonne National Laboratory in the directory pub/pcn at info.mcs. ani.gov (cf. Appendix A). This version of this document describes PCN version 2.0, a major revision of the PCN programming system. It supersedes earlier versions of this report.

  20. Policy Flash 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    JULY 2013 | Department of Energy 66 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance, JULY 2013 Policy Flash 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance, JULY 2013 Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Richard Bonnell of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division at 202-287-1747 or at richard.bonnell@hq.doe.gov PDF icon Flash 2013-66 Revisions to the Merit Review Guide 2013 WPEA.pdf More Documents & Publications POLICY FLASH 2013-66

  1. POLICY FLASH 2013-58 Revised Guide for Financial Assistance | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy POLICY FLASH 2013-58 Revised Guide for Financial Assistance POLICY FLASH 2013-58 Revised Guide for Financial Assistance Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Ellen Colligan at (202) 287-1776 or Ellen.colligan@hq.doe.gov. PDF icon Policy Flash 2013-58 Revised Guide for Finanacial Assistance.pdf PDF icon THE DOE GUIDE TO FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE More Documents & Publications Guide to Financial Assistance Policy Flash 2013-36 Update to Congressional Notifications -

  2. POLICY FLASH 2013-58 Revised Guide for Financial Assistance | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy 8 Revised Guide for Financial Assistance POLICY FLASH 2013-58 Revised Guide for Financial Assistance Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Ellen Colligan at (202) 287-1776 or Ellen.colligan@hq.doe.gov. PDF icon Policy Flash 2013-58 Revised Guide for Finanacial Assistance.pdf PDF icon THE DOE GUIDE TO FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE More Documents & Publications Guide to Financial Assistance Financial Assistance Letter No. FAL 2010-03 AL2010-03.

  3. POLICY FLASH 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for FInancail Assistance,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    July 2013 | Department of Energy POLICY FLASH 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for FInancail Assistance, July 2013 POLICY FLASH 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for FInancail Assistance, July 2013 Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Richard Bonnell of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division at 202-287-1747 or at richard.bonnell@hq.doe.gov PDF icon Flash 2013-66 Revisions to the Merit Review Guide 2013 WPEA.pdf More Documents & Publications

  4. Waste acceptance criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Revision 4

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1991-12-01

    This Revision 4 of the Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC), WIPP-DOE-069, identifies and consolidates existing criteria and requirements which regulate the safe handling and preparation of Transuranic (TRU) waste packages for transportation to and emplacement in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This consolidation does not invalidate any existing certification of TRU waste to the WIPP Operations and Safety Criteria (Revision 3 of WIPP-DOE--069) and/or Transportation: Waste Package Requirements (TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report for Packaging [SARP]). Those documents being consolidated, including Revision 3 of the WAC, currently support the Test Phase.

  5. Microsoft Word - DOE-CBFO-01-1006-NDA Box PDP Plan-Revision 5-Final 2-5-2015

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    6 Performance Demonstration Program Plan for Nondestructive Assay of Boxed Wastes for the TRU Waste Characterization Program Revision 5 February 2015 This document supersedes Revision 4 of DOE/CBFO-01-1006 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office TRU Sites and Transportation Division DOE/CBFO-01-1006 Revision 5 NDA Box PDP Plan February 2015 2 This document has been submitted as required to: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information PO Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN

  6. GETEM Manuals and Revision Notes

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please refer to these manuals and revision notes prior to downloading and running the Geothermal Electricity Technology Evaluation Model (GETEM). Because this is a beta version, you are urged to...

  7. RPP-RPT-42583 Revision

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations C. S. Henderson T. C. Mackey Washington River Protection Solutions Date Published

  8. Coal Data Publication Revision Policy

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Publication Revision Policy IF this occurs: THEN Survey Manager determines impact: WHAT happens next to the database and in our coal reports: Respondent provides data that are clearly incorrect or revised data for any period in the current reporting year. If National level percentage is > 1%, or If Regional level percentage is > 5%, or If State level percentage is > 10%. Quarterly Coal Report (QCR) and Quarterly Coal Distribution Report (QCDR) will be reposted no further back than the

  9. Archived Publications and Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Archived Publications and Documents Print ALS 20-Year Roadmap, 2003 Presentations made to the BESAC subcommittee on the 20-Year BES Facilities Roadmap, with references and relevant links. Beamline Data Sheets Data sheets for individual ALS beamlines. The Atomic and Molecular Facility on Beamline 10.0.1 A guide to Beamline 10's facilities for general users studying atomic and molecular physics. (LBL PUB-832) World Class Protein Crystallography A guide to the facilities and capabilities of the

  10. Archived Publications and Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Archived Publications and Documents Print ALS 20-Year Roadmap, 2003 Presentations made to the BESAC subcommittee on the 20-Year BES Facilities Roadmap, with references and relevant links. Beamline Data Sheets Data sheets for individual ALS beamlines. The Atomic and Molecular Facility on Beamline 10.0.1 A guide to Beamline 10's facilities for general users studying atomic and molecular physics. (LBL PUB-832) World Class Protein Crystallography A guide to the facilities and capabilities of the

  11. WINDExchange: Document Not Found

    Wind Powering America (EERE)

    EERE Logo WINDExchange WINDExchange Document Not Found The page you are looking for is no longer available. The U.S. Department of Energy Wind Program's stakeholder and engagement outreach information is now available through WINDExchange. WINDExchange continues DOE's efforts to make high-quality information and outreach materials readily available, including: maps of wind resources and installed wind capacity a bimonthly e-newsletter webinars and podcasts publications educational programs

  12. WIPP Documents - Other

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Other Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure The Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office's proposed approach to cleaning up and closing transuranic waste storage sites. August 2004 Solid Waste Management Report Solid Waste Management Unit Activities from May 1, 2004 through July 31, 2004, August 2004 Quarterly Progress Report The Karst and Related Issues at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Dated 6/23/09 Pioneering Nuclear Waste Disposal DOE/CAO-00-3124, Feb. 2000 Documents the 40-plus year

  13. SANSMIC design document.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Weber, Paula D.; Rudeen, David Keith

    2015-07-01

    The United States Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) maintains an underground storage system consisting of caverns that were leached or solution mined in four salt domes located near the Gulf of Mexico in Texas and Louisiana. The SPR comprises more than 60 active caverns containing approximately 700 million barrels of crude oil. Sandia National Labo- ratories (SNL) is the geotechnical advisor to the SPR. As the most pressing need at the inception of the SPR was to create and fill storage volume with oil, the decision was made to leach the caverns and fill them simultaneously (leach-fill). Therefore, A.J. Russo developed SANSMIC in the early 1980s which allows for a transient oil-brine interface (OBI) making it possible to model leach-fill and withdrawal operations. As the majority of caverns are currently filled to storage capacity, the primary uses of SANSMIC at this time are related to the effects of small and large withdrawals, expansion of existing caverns, and projecting future pillar to diameter ratios. SANSMIC was identified by SNL as a priority candidate for qualification. This report continues the quality assurance (QA) process by documenting the "as built" mathematical and numerical models that comprise this document. The pro- gram flow is outlined and the models are discussed in detail. Code features that were added later or were not documented previously have been expounded. No changes in the code's physics have occurred since the original documentation (Russo, 1981, 1983) although recent experiments may yield improvements to the temperature and plume methods in the future.

  14. Document Imaging | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Document Imaging Document Imaging Converting Paper Documents into Electronic Files Converting paper documents into electronic files helps us manage, store, access and archive the organizational information we have "locked up" in paper documents. Utilizing high-quality document scanners, a top-end six-engine Optical Character Recognition (OCR) system and maintaining Quality Controls to provide a successful Imaging solution. Once converted, these electronic files can be indexed and

  15. NEPA Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Services » NEPA Documents NEPA Documents To see a list of available NEPA documents by type and sorted by publication date, click on the links below. Documents listed in this section are available to members of the public. To see documents not electronically available to the public see the Secure NEPA Documents page for more information. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Categorical exclusions are categories of actions that DOE has determined, by regulation, do not individually or

  16. Documents Related to the INL

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Financial Assistance & Solicitations > INL Contract > Documents Related INL Blue Line Free Acrobat Reader Link The documents listed below represent an electronic copy of...

  17. Documents Related to the ICP

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Financial Assistance & Solicitations > ICP Contract > Documents Related ICP Blue Line Free Acrobat Reader Link The documents listed below are related to the Idaho Cleanup...

  18. FOIA - Enron Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    - Enron Documents FOIA - Enron Documents Enron Documents in PDF format PDF icon Enron Documents received from Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs PDF icon Enron Documents 1992 PDF icon Enron Documents 1993 PDF icon Enron Documents 1994 PDF icon Enron Documents 1995 PDF icon Enron Documents 1996 PDF icon Enron Documents 1997 PDF icon Enron Documents 1998 PDF icon Documents Enron 1999 PDF icon Enron Documents 2000 PDF icon Enron Documents 2001 PDF icon Enron Documents 2002 More

  19. Revisions to US EPA Superfund Risk and Dose Assessment Models and Guidance - 13403

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Walker, Stuart A.

    2013-07-01

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund program's six Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) and Dose Compliance Concentration (DCC) internet based calculators for risk and dose assessment at Superfund sites are being revised to reflect better science, revisions to existing exposure scenarios and new scenarios, and changes to match up more closely with the EPA chemical regional screening level calculator. A revised version of the 1999 guidance document that provides an overview for the Superfund risk assessment process at radioactively contaminated sites, 'Radiation Risk Assessment At CERCLA Sites: Q and A', is being completed that will reflect Superfund recommended guidance and other technical documents issued over the past 13 years. EPA is also issuing a series of fact sheets in the document 'Superfund Radiation Risk Assessment: A Community Tool-kit'. This presentation would go over those changes that are expected to be finished by this spring. (authors)

  20. Enron Documents 2000 | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    0 Enron Documents 2000 Enron Documents for 2000, enron2000.pdf PDF icon Enron Documents 2000 More Documents & Publications Enron Documents 1996 FOIA - Enron Documents Documents Enron 1999

  1. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant No-Migration Variance Petition. Revision 1, Volume 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hunt, Arlen

    1990-03-01

    The purpose of the WIPP No-Migration Variance Petition is to demonstrate, according to the requirements of RCRA {section}3004(d) and 40 CFR {section}268.6, that to a reasonable degree of certainty, there will be no migration of hazardous constituents from the facility for as long as the wastes remain hazardous. The DOE submitted the petition to the EPA in March 1989. Upon completion of its initial review, the EPA provided to DOE a Notice of Deficiencies (NOD). DOE responded to the EPA`s NOD and met with the EPA`s reviewers of the petition several times during 1989. In August 1989, EPA requested that DOE submit significant additional information addressing a variety of topics including: waste characterization, ground water hydrology, geology and dissolution features, monitoring programs, the gas generation test program, and other aspects of the project. This additional information was provided to EPA in January 1990 when DOE submitted Revision 1 of the Addendum to the petition. For clarity and ease of review, this document includes all of these submittals, and the information has been updated where appropriate. This document is divided into the following sections: Introduction, 1.0: Facility Description, 2.0: Waste Description, 3.0; Site Characterization, 4.0; Environmental Impact Analysis, 5.0; Prediction and Assessment of Infrequent Events, 6.0; and References, 7.0.

  2. EIA model documentation: Electricity market module - electricity fuel dispatch

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-01-01

    This report documents the National Energy Modeling System Electricity Fuel Dispatch Submodule (EFD), a submodule of the Electricity Market Module (EMM) as it was used for EIA`s Annual Energy Outlook 1997. It replaces previous documentation dated March 1994 and subsequent yearly update revisions. The report catalogues and describes the model assumptions, computational methodology, parameter estimation techniques, model source code, and forecast results generated through the synthesis and scenario development based on these components. This document serves four purposes. First, it is a reference document providing a detailed description of the model for reviewers and potential users of the EFD including energy experts at the Energy Information Administration (EIA), other Federal agencies, state energy agencies, private firms such as utilities and consulting firms, and non-profit groups such as consumer and environmental groups. Second, this report meets the legal requirement of the Energy Information Administration (EIA) to provide adequate documentation in support of its statistical and forecast reports. Third, it facilitates continuity in model development by providing documentation which details model enhancements that were undertaken for AE097 and since the previous documentation. Last, because the major use of the EFD is to develop forecasts, this documentation explains the calculations, major inputs and assumptions which were used to generate the AE097.

  3. SSC Safety Review Document

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Toohig, T.E. [ed.

    1988-11-01

    The safety strategy of the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) Central Design Group (CDG) is to mitigate potential hazards to personnel, as far as possible, through appropriate measures in the design and engineering of the facility. The Safety Review Document identifies, on the basis of the Conceptual Design Report (CDR) and related studies, potential hazards inherent in the SSC project independent of its site. Mitigative measures in the design of facilities and in the structuring of laboratory operations are described for each of the hazards identified.

  4. Complete Experiment Safety Documentation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview Upon receiving beam time: 1. Log in to ALSHub to complete an Experiment Safety Sheet (ESS). The ALS This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it is available to support you through this process. Please contact This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at the email link or at (510) 486-7222 at if you have questions or need more

  5. Complete Experiment Safety Documentation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview Upon receiving beam time: 1. Log in to ALSHub to complete an Experiment Safety Sheet (ESS). The ALS This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it is available to support you through this process. Please contact This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at the email link or at (510) 486-7222 at if you have questions or need more

  6. Complete Experiment Safety Documentation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview Upon receiving beam time: 1. Log in to ALSHub to complete an Experiment Safety Sheet (ESS). The ALS This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it is available to support you through this process. Please contact This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at the email link or at (510) 486-7222 at if you have questions or need more

  7. Complete Experiment Safety Documentation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview Upon receiving beam time: 1. Log in to ALSHub to complete an Experiment Safety Sheet (ESS). The ALS This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it is available to support you through this process. Please contact This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at the email link or at (510) 486-7222 at if you have questions or need more

  8. Complete Experiment Safety Documentation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Complete Experiment Safety Documentation Print User Safety Overview Upon receiving beam time: 1. Log in to ALSHub to complete an Experiment Safety Sheet (ESS). The ALS This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it is available to support you through this process. Please contact This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it at the email link or at (510) 486-7222 at if you have questions or need more

  9. Microsoft Word - Document5

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Serene Fang [mailto:Serene.Fang@aljazeera.net] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 3:17 PM To: Holloway, Jerry N Subject: RE: Media request - WRPS re: Hanford Hello Jerry, Here's a formal FOIA for the media material I'm interested in. If I need to send this to anyone else on the WRPS, ORP, DOE team, please let me know. This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act. I specifically request: - Any inspection video or documentation video or photographs of AY-102, the leaking double-shell tank

  10. Microsoft Word - Document1

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Greg Coulter [mailto:greg.coulter405@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 4:13 PM To: Barhydt, Laura Cc: Armstrong, Ashley; Leon Chapa Ismael Ricardo (GE Infra Energy Subject: GE-Prolec CCE Meeting October 19,2010 Ms. Barhydt, This e-mail documents the GE-Prolec CCE meeting of October 19, 2010 concerning Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014. Mr. Ismael Leon and myself met with Ms. Ashley Armstrong, Ms. Celia Sher, Ms. Stephanie Weiner, and Ms. Laura Barhydt in your offices and discussed the

  11. Document Preparation | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Document Preparation Document Preparation Selected documents on the topic of NEPA Document Preparation. July 29, 2015 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA DOE Offices are encouraged to be inclusive in providing potentially interested parties with opportunities to review NEPA documents. This Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA is primarily intended to supplement lists that Departmental Offices compile for individual projects or facilities. It

  12. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Coalbed methane proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2014 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and Subdivision 12/31/13 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/14 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lower 48 States 12,392 1,796 3,299 1,020 442 680 395 0 0 1,404 15,696 Alabama 413 641 42 40 0 0 0

  13. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Crude oil and lease condensate proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2014 million barrels Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and Subdivision 12/31/13 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/14 Alaska 2,898 1 239 196 125 187 35 0 0 182 2,857 Lower 48 States 33,622 439 5,789 5,416 2,350 2,641 4,986 164 219

  14. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Crude oil proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2014 million barrels Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and Subdivision 12/31/13 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/14 Alaska 2,898 1 238 196 125 186 35 0 0 182 2,855 Lower 48 States 30,473 515 5,077 4,798 2,032 2,234 4,395 151 207 2,692 33,530 Alabama

  15. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Lease condensate proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2014 million barrels Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and Subdivision 12/31/13 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/14 Alaska 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 Lower 48 States 3,149 -76 712 618 318 407 591 13 12 326 3,546 Alabama 14 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 13

  16. SCB initiator

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Bickes Jr., Robert W.; Renlund, Anita M.; Stanton, Philip L.

    1994-11-01

    A detonator for high explosives initiated by mechanical impact includes a cylindrical barrel, a layer of flyer material mechanically covering the barrel at one end, and a semiconductor bridge ignitor including a pair of electrically conductive pads connected by a semiconductor bridge. The bridge is in operational contact with the layer, whereby ignition of said bridge forces a portion of the layer through the barrel to detonate the explosive. Input means are provided for igniting the semiconductor bridge ignitor.

  17. SCB initiator

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Bickes, Jr., Robert W. (Albuquerque, NM); Renlund, Anita M. (Albuquerque, NM); Stanton, Philip L. (Albuquerque, NM)

    1994-01-01

    A detonator for high explosives initiated by mechanical impact includes a cylindrical barrel, a layer of flyer material mechanically covering the barrel at one end, and a semiconductor bridge ignitor including a pair of electrically conductive pads connected by a semiconductor bridge. The bridge is in operational contact with the layer, whereby ignition of said bridge forces a portion of the layer through the barrel to detonate the explosive. Input means are provided for igniting the semiconductor bridge ignitor.

  18. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Miscellaneous -- Volume 3, Revision 4

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Petrie, L.M.; Jordon, W.C.; Edwards, A.L. |

    1995-04-01

    SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice; (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System developments has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. This manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for the functional module documentation, and Volume 3--for the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

  19. Microsoft Word - Document1

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Note from Sam Rashkin: Educating Appraisers Begins with a Consistent Framework More on appraisers later; first some history. Back in April I wrapped up my 'Note From Sam' on the DOE Race to Zero Student Design Competition with a promise to talk about another DOE building science education initiative in the next newsletter. Okay, I lied. It's several issues later, but now I'm ready. The Race to Zero is a great event for inspiring students to pursue careers in sustainable buildings and to

  20. Microsoft Word - TSA _NP Boilerplate- revised 7-29-13

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Boilerplate TSA - Non-Proprietary 1 Revision 2 Initial _____ / _____ January 2011 TECHNICAL SERVICE AGREEMENT No. ___________ Article I. Parties to the Agreement The Parties to this Agreement are The Ames Laboratory, Iowa State University of Science and Technology ("the Laboratory"), operating under Prime Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11358 ("Prime Contract") with the United States Government ("Government") represented by the U. S. Department of Energy ("DOE"),

  1. Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Nickolaus, J.R.; Bohlander, K.L.

    1996-08-01

    As part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program (SRP-UDP), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. The SRP-UDP has been completed and the SRP-Maintenance Program (SRP-MP) is now maintaining this listing. Besides updating previous information, Revision 3 adds approximately 80 citations. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Enforcement Manual, Generic Letters, Inspection Manual, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, Standard Technical Specifications and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

  2. Enron Documents 2001 | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    1 Enron Documents 2001 Enron Documents 2001, enron2001.pdf PDF icon Enron Documents 2001 More Documents & Publications Enron Documents 2002 Biography - Spencer Abraham, Secretary, Department of Energy (PDF ) Enron Documents 1996

  3. Technologist-in-Residence Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Technologist-in-Residence Documents Technologist-in-Residence Documents These documents are related to the Clean Energy Manufacturing Initiative's Technologist-in-Residence Pilot. The Technologist-in-Residence Pilot will help catalyze strong Lab-Industry relationships that result in significant growth in high-impact collaborative research and development. The goals of the pilot are to 1) increase collaborative research and development between national laboratories and private sector companies,

  4. Seismic analyses of equipment in 2736-Z complex. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ocoma, E.C.

    1995-04-01

    This report documents the structural qualification for the existing equipment when subjected to seismic loading in the Plutonium Storage Complex. It replaces in entirety Revision 0 and reconciles the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) comments on Revision 0. The Complex consists of 2736-Z Building (plutonium storage vault), 2736-ZA Building (vault ventilation equipment building), and 2736-ZB Building (shipping/receiving, repackaging activities). The existing equipment structurally qualified in this report are the metal storage racks for 7 inch and lard cans in room 2 of Building 2736-Z; the cubicles, can holders and pedestals in rooms 1, 3, and 4 of Building 2736-Z; the ventilation duct including exhaust fans/motors, emergency diesel generator, and HEPA filter housing in Building 2736-ZA; the repackaging glovebox in Building 2736-ZB; and the interface duct between Buildings 2736-Z and 2736-ZA.

  5. Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision of Chapter 11, Contracting Officer's Representative SUMMARY: The...

  6. Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711)Revision 3: Update Methodology and Key Revisions

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    OHara J. M.; Higgins, J.; Fleger, S.

    2012-07-22

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the human factors engineering (HFE) programs of applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits, operating licenses, standard design certifications, and combined operating licenses. The purpose of these safety reviews is to help ensure that personnel performance and reliability are appropriately supported. Detailed design review procedures and guidance for the evaluations is provided in three key documents: the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711), and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). These documents were last revised in 2007, 2004 and 2002, respectively. The NRC is committed to the periodic update and improvement of the guidance to ensure that it remains a state-of-the-art design evaluation tool. To this end, the NRC is updating its guidance to stay current with recent research on human performance, advances in HFE methods and tools, and new technology being employed in plant and control room design. NUREG-0711 is the first document to be addressed. We present the methodology used to update NUREG-0711 and summarize the main changes made. Finally, we discuss the current status of the update program and the future plans.

  7. Residential Demand Module - NEMS Documentation

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2014-01-01

    Model Documentation - Documents the objectives, analytical approach, and development of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) Residential Sector Demand Module. The report catalogues and describes the model assumptions, computational methodology, parameter estimation techniques, and FORTRAN source code.

  8. Clean Energy Manufacturing Initiative Midwest Regional Summit:

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Lightweighting Breakout Session Summary | Department of Energy Clean Energy Manufacturing Initiative Midwest Regional Summit: Lightweighting Breakout Session Summary Clean Energy Manufacturing Initiative Midwest Regional Summit: Lightweighting Breakout Session Summary Clean Energy Manufacturing Initiative Midwest Regional Summit: Lightweighting Breakout Session Summary June 21, 2013 PDF icon Lightweighting Breakout Session Summary More Documents & Publications Fiber Reinforced Polymer

  9. Document Control Program | The Ames Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Training & Documents Document Control Program The Document Control (DC) Plan ensures that only approved, current versions of such documents are used in the workplace or transmitted...

  10. Target Explanation Document: Onboard Hydrogen Storage for Light-Duty Fuel Cell Vehicles

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Target Explanation Document: Onboard Hydrogen Storage for Light-Duty Fuel Cell Vehicles Revised May 2015 This target explanation is a document of the U.S. DRIVE Partnership. U.S. DRIVE (Driving Research and Innovation for Vehicle efficiency and Energy sustainability) is a voluntary, non-binding, and nonlegal partnership among the U.S. Department of Energy; USCAR, representing Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors; Tesla Motors; five energy companies -BP America,

  11. NEPA Documentation | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NEPA Documentation NEPA Documentation Attached, per your request, are two lists: (1) DOE environmental assessments (EAs) issued since 12/1/2006 and (2) DOE environmental impact statements (EISs) issued since 12/1/2006. Also, per your request, is a copy of a general NEPA briefing provided to the Acting Deputy Secretary in May 2008. Please let me know if you have any further questions (carol.borgstrom @hq.doe.gov; 202-586-4600). NEPA_Documentation.pdf PDF icon NEPA Documentation More Documents

  12. Target Explanation Document: Onboard Hydrogen Storage for Light-Duty Fuel Cell Vehicles

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This document, revised in May 2015, describes the basis for the technical targets for onboard hydrogen storage for light-duty fuel cell vehicles in the Fuel Cell Technologies Office's Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan and includes a detailed explanation of each target.

  13. DOE Standard 3009-2014, Preparation of Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis, Roll Out Training

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Nuclear Safety is performing a series of site visits to provide roll-out training and assistance to Program and Site Offices and their contractors on effective implementation of the new revision to DOE Standard 3009-2014, Preparation of Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis.

  14. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Functional modules F9--F16 -- Volume 2, Part 2, Revision 4

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    West, J.T.; Hoffman, T.J.; Emmett, M.B.; Childs, K.W.; Petrie, L.M.; Landers, N.F.; Bryan, C.B.; Giles, G.E.

    1995-04-01

    SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. The manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for functional module documentation; and Volume 3--for documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries. This volume discusses the following functional modules: MORSE-SGC; HEATING 7.2; KENO V.a; JUNEBUG-II; HEATPLOT-S; REGPLOT 6; PLORIGEN; and OCULAR.

  15. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Functional modules F1--F8 -- Volume 2, Part 1, Revision 4

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Greene, N.M.; Petrie, L.M.; Westfall, R.M.; Bucholz, J.A.; Hermann, O.W.; Fraley, S.K.

    1995-04-01

    SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. The manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation; Volume 2--for functional module documentation; and Volume 3--for documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

  16. Document Splash Screen for Redirecting to Updated Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    The document you are trying to access has been updated. Click the button below to access the most recent version. Go To Publication

  17. EERE Program Management Initiative (PMI) Brochure | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Initiative (PMI) Brochure EERE Program Management Initiative (PMI) Brochure The EERE Program Management Initiative document outlines a coordinated set of actions to improve its program management capabilities. PDF icon pmi_brochure.pdf More Documents & Publications EERE Program Management Guide - About the Program Management Guide EERE Program Management Guide - Appendix I

  18. CONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NSN 7540-01-152-8070 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 CONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED DE-AC02-09CH11466/0220 PAGE OF PAGES 2 2 NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR The Trustees of Princeton University 14. Description of Amendment/Modification (continued): a. The following clauses will be revised or inserted in PART I, SECTION H, SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS, and applicable TABLE OF CONTENTS modified: CLAUSE H.22 - EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION:

  19. Microsoft Word - Document1 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Document1 Microsoft Word - Document1 PDF icon Microsoft Word - Document1 More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - Document2 Microsoft Word - ARRAAttachment12v1.doc Microsoft Word - Frequently_Asked_Questions

  20. Solar Background Document 5 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    5 Solar Background Document 5 Graph illustrating Chinese Development Bank financing to Chinese solar companies. PDF icon Solar Background Document 5.pdf More Documents & Publications Solar Background Document 7 National Solar Jobs Census 2014 Solar Background Document 4

  1. Compliance Documents | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Compliance » Compliance Documents Compliance Documents This photo shows the Savannah River Site’s Heavy Water Components Test Reactor during decommissioning. This photo shows the Savannah River Site's Heavy Water Components Test Reactor during decommissioning. Compliance and other legal documents illustrate and help support the development of effective compliance approaches and strategies, and can assist in promoting greater cooperation, coordination, and consistency with other EM offices,

  2. Documentation - Laboratory for Laser Energetics

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Omega Laser Facility Documentation 3000 LFORM 6950 Incident Review and Reporting 6610 LLE Radiological Controls Manual 9800 Introduction of Computers Into the OMEGA Facility Operations Procedure Document Release Process (M-TM-P-028) Product Data Management (PDM) (look up and administer numbered documents) LLE Clean Room Procedures and Protocol OMEGA Laser System Volume I - System Description (S-AA-M-12) Volume II - System Operation Procedures (S-AA-M-13) Volume III - Subsystem and Component

  3. Reference Documents | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Reference Documents Reference Documents The following are reference documents utilized by CNS staff to perform its functions. Understanding Process Plant Schedule Slippage and Startup Costs A Review of Cost Estimation in New Technologies - Implications for Energy Process Plants Understanding Cost Growth and Performance Shortfalls in Pioneer Process Plants Pioneer Plants Study User's Manual The Formation of Pioneer Plant Projects in Chemical Processing Firms Industry Information Practices and the

  4. Microdrill Initiative - Initial Market Evaluation

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Spears & Associates, Inc

    2003-07-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is launching a major research and development initiative to create a small, fast, inexpensive and environmentally friendly rig for drilling 5000 feet boreholes to investigate potential oil and gas reservoirs. DOE wishes to get input from petroleum industry operators, service companies and equipment suppliers on the operation and application of this coiled-tubing-based drilling unit. To that end, DOE has asked Spears & Associates, Inc. (SAI) to prepare a special state-of-the-market report and assist during a DOE-sponsored project-scoping workshop in Albuquerque near the end of April 2003. The scope of the project is four-fold: (1) Evaluate the history, status and future of demand for very small bore-hole drilling; (2) Measure the market for coiled tubing drilling and describe the state-of-the-art; (3) Identify companies and individuals who should have an interest in micro drilling and invite them to the DOE workshop; and (4) Participate in 3 concurrent workshop sessions, record and evaluate participant comments and report workshop conclusions.

  5. NRC comprehensive records disposition schedule. Revision 3

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-02-01

    Title 44 US Code, ``Public Printing and Documents,`` regulations issued by the General Service Administration (GSA) in 41 CFR Chapter 101, Subchapter B, ``Management and Use of Information and Records,`` and regulations issued by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in 36 CFR Chapter 12, Subchapter B, ``Records Management,`` require each agency to prepare and issue a comprehensive records disposition schedule that contains the NARA approved records disposition schedules for records unique to the agency and contains the NARA`s General Records Schedules for records common to several or all agencies. The approved records disposition schedules specify the appropriate duration of retention and the final disposition for records created or maintained by the NRC. NUREG-0910, Rev. 3, contains ``NRC`s Comprehensive Records Disposition Schedule,`` and the original authorized approved citation numbers issued by NARA. Rev. 3 incorporates NARA approved changes and additions to the NRC schedules that have been implemented since the last revision dated March, 1992, reflects recent organizational changes implemented at the NRC, and includes the latest version of NARA`s General Records Schedule (dated August 1995).

  6. SCALE: A modular code system for performing Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation. Volume 1, Part 2: Control modules S1--H1; Revision 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-03-01

    SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automated the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.3 of the system.

  7. Test and evaluation document for DOT Specification 7A type A packaging. Volume 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kelly, D L

    1997-08-04

    The US Department of Energy (DOE) has been conducting, through several of its operating contractors, an evaluation and testing program to qualify Type A radioactive material packagings per US Department of Transportation (DOT) Specification 7A (DOT-7A) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 49, Part 178 (49 CFR 178). This document summarizes the evaluation and testing performed for all of the packagings successfully qualified in this program. This document supersedes DOE Evaluation Document for DOT-7A Type A Packaging (Edling 1987), originally issued in 1987 by Monsanto Research Corporation Mound Laboratory (MLM), Miamisburg, Ohio, for the Department of Energy, Security Evaluation Program (I)P-4. Mound Laboratory issued four revisions to the document between November 1988 and December 1989. In September 1989, the program was transferred to Westinghouse Hanford Company (Westinghouse Hanford) in Richland, Washington. One additional revision was issued in March 1990 by Westinghouse Hanford. This revision reflects the earlier material and incorporates a number of changes. Evaluation and testing activities on 1208 three DOT-7A Program Dockets resulted in the qualification of three new packaging configurations, which are incorporated herein and summarized. This document presents approximately 300 different packagings that have been determined to meet the requirements for a DOT-7A, type A packaging per 49 CFR 178.350.

  8. Emergency Doses (ED) - Revision 3: A calculator code for environmental dose computations

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rittmann, P.D.

    1990-12-01

    The calculator program ED (Emergency Doses) was developed from several HP-41CV calculator programs documented in the report Seven Health Physics Calculator Programs for the HP-41CV, RHO-HS-ST-5P (Rittman 1984). The program was developed to enable estimates of offsite impacts more rapidly and reliably than was possible with the software available for emergency response at that time. The ED - Revision 3, documented in this report, revises the inhalation dose model to match that of ICRP 30, and adds the simple estimates for air concentration downwind from a chemical release. In addition, the method for calculating the Pasquill dispersion parameters was revised to match the GENII code within the limitations of a hand-held calculator (e.g., plume rise and building wake effects are not included). The summary report generator for printed output, which had been present in the code from the original version, was eliminated in Revision 3 to make room for the dispersion model, the chemical release portion, and the methods of looping back to an input menu until there is no further no change. This program runs on the Hewlett-Packard programmable calculators known as the HP-41CV and the HP-41CX. The documentation for ED - Revision 3 includes a guide for users, sample problems, detailed verification tests and results, model descriptions, code description (with program listing), and independent peer review. This software is intended to be used by individuals with some training in the use of air transport models. There are some user inputs that require intelligent application of the model to the actual conditions of the accident. The results calculated using ED - Revision 3 are only correct to the extent allowed by the mathematical models. 9 refs., 36 tabs.

  9. TECHNICAL BASIS DOCUMENT FOR NATURAL EVENT HAZARDS

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    KRIPPS, L.J.

    2006-07-31

    This technical basis document was developed to support the documented safety analysis (DSA) and describes the risk binning process and the technical basis for assigning risk bins for natural event hazard (NEH)-initiated accidents. The purpose of the risk binning process is to determine the need for safety-significant structures, systems, and components (SSC) and technical safety requirement (TSR)-level controls for a given representative accident or represented hazardous conditions based on an evaluation of the frequency and consequence. Note that the risk binning process is not applied to facility workers, because all facility worker hazardous conditions are considered for safety-significant SSCs and/or TSR-level controls.

  10. SRS ecology: Environmental information document

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Wike, L.D.; Shipley, R.W.; Bowers, J.A.

    1993-09-01

    The purpose of this Document is to provide a source of ecological information based on the exiting knowledge gained from research conducted at the Savannah River Site. This document provides a summary and synthesis of ecological research in the three main ecosystem types found at SRS and information on the threatened and endangered species residing there.

  11. Important Trinity / NERSC-8 Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    RFP » Important Trinity / NERSC-8 Documents Important Trinity / NERSC-8 Documents Trinity / NERSC-8 Use Case Scenarios for Burst Buffer and Power Management [PDF] Facility Limits for Trinity (Updated June 4, 2013) [PDF] Last edited: 2016-02-01 08:07:30

  12. Ultrafast Laser Diagnostics for Studies of Shock Initiation in...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Ultrafast Laser Diagnostics for Studies of Shock Initiation in Energetic Materials. Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Ultrafast Laser Diagnostics for Studies of Shock ...

  13. MARTINI event generator for heavy quarks: Initialization, parton...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    MARTINI event generator for heavy quarks: Initialization, parton evolution, and hadronization Citation Details In-Document Search Title: MARTINI event generator for heavy quarks: ...

  14. Nuclear Safety Workshop Agenda - Post Fukushima Initiatives and...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    of Energy's (DOE) nuclear facilities and identify opportunities for improvement. Nuclear Safety Workshop Agenda - Post Fukushima Initiatives and Results More Documents &...

  15. Energy Data Initiative (EDI) | OpenEI Community

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Energy Data Initiative (EDI) Home > Features > Groups Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Content type Blog entry Discussion Document Event Poll Question Keywords...

  16. Initial Experimental Results of a Machine Learning-Based Temperature...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Temperature Control System for an RF Gun Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Initial Experimental Results of a Machine Learning-Based Temperature Control ...

  17. Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands Initial Technical Assessment

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Baring-Gould, I.; Hunsberger, R.; Visser, C.; Voss, P.

    2011-07-01

    This document is an initial energy assessment for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), the first of many steps in developing a comprehensive energy strategy.

  18. GUIDELINES FOR BREASTFEEDING MOTHERS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE LATEST REVISION DATE: 9/3/96

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    GUIDELINES FOR BREASTFEEDING MOTHERS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE LATEST REVISION DATE: 9/3/96 The material in this document has been developed as part of a NUREG document (1492). The data in this document may also be quoted as a personal communication from the Radiation Internal Dose Information Center. Please contact the center with any questions or comments about the data. Richard E. Toohey, 423-576-3448 phone, 423-576-8673 fax, tooheyr@orau.gov e-mail Audrey T. Stelson, 423-576-3450 phone,

  19. TECHNICAL BASIS FOR VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS IN TANK FARMS OPERATING SPECIFICATIONS DOCUMENTS

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    BERGLIN, E J

    2003-06-23

    This report provides the technical basis for high efficiency particulate air filter (HEPA) for Hanford tank farm ventilation systems (sometimes known as heating, ventilation and air conditioning [HVAC]) to support limits defined in Process Engineering Operating Specification Documents (OSDs). This technical basis included a review of older technical basis and provides clarifications, as necessary, to technical basis limit revisions or justification. This document provides an updated technical basis for tank farm ventilation systems related to Operation Specification Documents (OSDs) for double-shell tanks (DSTs), single-shell tanks (SSTs), double-contained receiver tanks (DCRTs), catch tanks, and various other miscellaneous facilities.

  20. TITLE XVII GOVERNING DOCUMENTS | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    GOVERNING DOCUMENTS TITLE XVII GOVERNING DOCUMENTS TITLE XVII GOVERNING DOCUMENTS The following lists documents that provide the statutory and legislative framework for the Title XVII loan guarantee program. TITLE XVII GOVERNING DOCUMENTS: * FOUNDATIONAL LEGISLATION, RULES, AND DOCUMENTS * APPROPRIATIONS * ADDITIONAL LEGAL REQUIREMENTS * TITLE XVII RELATED LINKS * CLOSED SOLICITATIONS * AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT FOUNDATIONAL LEGISLATION, RULES, AND DOCUMENTS Energy Policy Act of

  1. Advanced Nuclear Technology: Advanced Light Water Reactors Utility Requirements Document Small Modular Reactors Inclusion Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Loflin, Leonard; McRimmon, Beth

    2014-12-18

    This report summarizes a project by EPRI to include requirements for small modular light water reactors (smLWR) into the EPRI Utility Requirements Document (URD) for Advanced Light Water Reactors. The project was jointly funded by EPRI and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The report covers the scope and content of the URD, the process used to revise the URD to include smLWR requirements, a summary of the major changes to the URD to include smLWR, and how to use the URD as revised to achieve value on new plant projects.

  2. REVISED MD-110 REFERENCE GUIDE SEPTERMBER 2015

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    REVISED MD-110 REFERENCE GUIDE SEPTEMBER 2015 BACKGROUND On August 5, 2015, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) approved the first revision to its Management Directive 110 (MD-110) since 1999. The revised MD-110 provides federal agencies with updated Commission policies, procedures, and guidance relating to the federal sector complaint process as set forth in 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 and reflects new developments in case law, as the federal workplace and EEO practices have evolved. The

  3. ADR Revised Policy | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Revised Policy ADR Revised Policy SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to

  4. NMED Presentation on Revised Consent Order

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    At the November 12, 2015 Special NNMCAB Meeting NMED Secretary Ryan Flynn provided a presentation on the Revisions to the 2005 Order on Consent.

  5. Implementation of Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    D'Amico, E.; O'Leary, J.; Bell, S.; Djordjevic, S.; Givens, C,; Shokes, T.; Thompson, S.; Stahl, S.

    2003-02-25

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on July 27, 2001 approved Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report (SAR) and the associated TRUPACT-II Authorized Methods for Payload Control (TRAMPAC). Key initiatives in Revision 19 included matrix depletion, unlimited mixing of shipping categories, a flammability assessment methodology, and an alternative methodology for the determination of flammable gas generation rates. All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites shipping transuranic (TRU) waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) were required to implement Revision 19 methodology into their characterization and waste transportation programs by May 20, 2002. An implementation process was demonstrated by the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) in Golden, Colorado. The three-part process used by RFETS included revision of the site-specific TRAMPAC, an evaluation of the contact-handled TRU waste inventory against the regulations in Revision 19, and design and development of software to facilitate future inventory analyses.

  6. Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 8

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Neitzel, D.A.; Bjornstad, B.N.; Fosmire, C.J.; Fowler, R.A.

    1996-08-01

    This eighth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Chapters 4 and 6 in Hanford Site-related NEPA documents. Chapter 4 (Affected Environment) includes information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, historical, archaeological and cultural resources, socioeconomics, and noise. Chapter 6 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE directives and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site. The following sections were updated in this revision: climate and meteorology; ecology (threatened and endangered species section only); historical; archaeological and cultural resources; and all of chapter 6. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be used directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

  7. Latest Documents and Notices | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Natural Gas Project, Florida October 13, 2015 EA-2022: Draft Environmental Assessment Sleeping Giant Hydropower Project; Helena, Montana October 9, 2015 EIS-0463: Revision to EPA...

  8. Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document This document specifies the top-level...

  9. Public Reading Room: Environmental Documents, Reports

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Public Reading Room: Environmental Documents, Reports Public Reading Room: Environmental Documents, Reports Environmental documents and reports are available online. Hard copies...

  10. Documents and Publications | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Documents and Publications Documents and Publications Real Estate Documents Acquisition Guide for Federal Agencies Certified Reality Specialist Biography DOJ Title Standards for Acquisition

  11. Revised ground-water monitoring compliance plan for the 300 area process trenches

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schalla, R.; Aaberg, R.L.; Bates, D.J.; Carlile, J.V.M.; Freshley, M.D.; Liikala, T.L.; Mitchell, P.J.; Olsen, K.B.; Rieger, J.T.

    1988-09-01

    This document contains ground-water monitoring plans for process-water disposal trenches located on the Hanford Site. These trenches, designated the 300 Area Process Trenches, have been used since 1973 for disposal of water that contains small quantities of both chemicals and radionuclides. The ground-water monitoring plans contained herein represent revision and expansion of an effort initiated in June 1985. At that time, a facility-specific monitoring program was implemented at the 300 Area Process Trenches as part of a regulatory compliance effort for hazardous chemicals being conducted on the Hanford Site. This monitoring program was based on the ground-water monitoring requirements for interim-status facilities, which are those facilities that do not yet have final permits, but are authorized to continue interim operations while engaged in the permitting process. The applicable monitoring requirements are described in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 40 CFR 265.90 of the federal regulations, and in WAC 173-303-400 of Washington State's regulations (Washington State Department of Ecology 1986). The program implemented for the process trenches was designed to be an alternate program, which is required instead of the standard detection program when a facility is known or suspected to have contaminated the ground water in the uppermost aquifer. The plans for the program, contained in a document prepared by the US Department of Energy (USDOE) in 1985, called for monthly sampling of 14 of the 37 existing monitoring wells at the 300 Area plus the installation and sampling of 2 new wells. 27 refs., 25 figs., 15 tabs.

  12. Initial energy density and gluon distribution from the glasma...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Initial energy density and gluon distribution from the glasma in heavy-ion collisions Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Initial energy density and gluon distribution from the ...

  13. Innovative Manufacturing Initiative Recognition Day - Final Participant

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Listing | Department of Energy Day - Final Participant Listing Innovative Manufacturing Initiative Recognition Day - Final Participant Listing PDF icon imi_recogitionday_participants.pdf More Documents & Publications Innovative Manufacturing Initiative Recognition Day 2015 AMO Peer Review Agenda CX-100154 Categorical Exclusion Determination

  14. Innovative Manufacturing Initiative Recognition Day, Advanced Manufacturing

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Office (AMO) | Department of Energy Day, Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO) Innovative Manufacturing Initiative Recognition Day, Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO) PDF icon imi_recogitionday_leo_june2012.pdf More Documents & Publications Innovative Manufacturing Initiative Recognition Day Advanced Manufacturing Office Overview Unlocking the Potential of Additive Manufacturing in the Fuel Cells Industry

  15. Microsoft Word - Nastasi EFRC Technical_Document revised with new name v2.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Materials at Irradiation and Mechanical Extremes EFRC Director: Michael Nastasi Lead Institution: Los Alamos National Laboratory Mission Statement: To understand, at the atomic scale, the behavior of materials subject to extreme radiation doses and mechanical stress in order to synthesize new materials that can tolerate such conditions. Our EFRC addresses two of the five BESAC grand challenges: How do we design and perfect atom and energy-efficient syntheses of revolutionary new forms of matter

  16. Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties (NPS, 1990, revised 1998)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This National Park Service bulletin is meant to assist federal agencies, State Historic Preservation Officers, local governments, Indian tribes, and other historic preservation practitioners in determining whether properties thought to have traditional cultural significance are eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.

  17. Document

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Costs C. Solicitation D. Payment of the Credit Subsidy Cost E. Assessment of Fees F. Financial Structure G. Eligible Lenders H. FCRA I. Default and Audit Provisions J. Tax Exempt...

  18. Documents

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    target"blank">read more

    http:en.openei.orgcommunitydocumentprospects-nuclear-powerdavis-2012comments Energy Systems Integration Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:36:18...

  19. Document

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of alleged research misconduct to determine whether and what corrective actions and sanctions should be taken. Fabrication means making up data or results and recording or...

  20. Document

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the contracting officer to lists of entities and individuals subject to economic sanctions that are available at http: www.epls.govTerList1.html. The contracting officer is...

  1. Document

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    settlement agreement signed by it and the National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation....

  2. Document

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    including through the use of information technology. Dated: February 8, 2011. Darrin A. King, Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management...

  3. Document

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    48 CFR Chapter 1 Federal Acquisition Regulations; Purchases from Federal Prison Industries- Requirement for Market Research and Small Entity Compliance Guide; Interim...

  4. Document

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    ... served as DOE's agent to acquire crude oil using appropriated funds to attempt to meet ... the Government's share of production from the Naval Petroleum Reserve in California. ...

  5. Document

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... The Subcommittee seeks to base its analysis on an up-to-date understanding of the context ... DOE is aware that technology, business, consumer and regulatory issues interact in ...

  6. Document

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    WORK FOR OTHERS & CRADAs 1. WORK FOR OTHERS Work for others performed by DOE contractor personnel for Federal, State, and local government entities, non-Government/non-profit entities, universities, and privately-held corporations. This work is not directly funded by DOE, but is authorized by and administered by DOE. a. Agreement/Contract for Services Agreement executed by DOE, contractor and the requesting Federal, State, local, domestic, or private organization. Agreements stipulate

  7. Document

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Friday, January 9, 2009 Part II Department of Energy Privacy Act of 1974; Publication of Compilation of Privacy Act Systems of Records; Notice VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:08 Jan 08, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09JAN2.SGM 09JAN2 yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES2 994 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2009 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Privacy Act of 1974; Publication of Compilation of Privacy Act Systems of Records AGENCY: U.S. Department

  8. Document

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    contractor should be considered by the contracting officer in deciding appropriate invention rights arrangements. Response: Section 603.860(b) has been modified to instruct the...

  9. Document

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Amendment 39-16582; AD 2011-01-53 RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A Model PIAGGIO P-180 Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration...

  10. Document

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any ... and local agencies with jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to ...

  11. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    401 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 46 / Friday, March 7, 2008 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Fossil Energy Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee; Correction AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting Correction. The Department of Energy published a notice of open meeting announcing a meeting of the Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee, 73 FR 8863. In FR Doc. E8-2891, published on Friday, February 15, 2008, page 8863, under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, first column,

  12. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3623 Friday January 23, 1998 Part III Department of Energy Record of Decision for the Department of Energy's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Phase; Notice Record of Decision for the Department of Energy's Waste Management Program: Treatment and Storage of Transuranic Waste; Notice 3624 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 1998 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Record of Decision for the Department of Energy's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Phase AGENCY: U.S.

  13. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    63 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.-CROSSWALK OF DOE ORDER 4401.1A REQUIREMENTS AND 10 CFR 851 FINAL RULE REQUIREMENTS- Continued DOE order 440.1A requirements Corresponding 10 CFR 851 provisions 12.e. Title 29 CFR, Part 1926, ''Safety and Health Regulations for Con- struction''. .23(a)(7) Safety and health standards. 12.f. Title 29 CFR, Part 1928, ''Occupational Safety and Health Stand- ards for Agriculture''. .23(a)(8) Safety and

  14. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  15. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Monday, August 9, 2010 Part II Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration 29 CFR Part 1926 Cranes and Derricks in Construction; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:33 Aug 06, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09AUR2.SGM 09AUR2 emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES2 DOE/RL-92-36, Hanford Site Hoisting and Rigging Manual Chapter 19.0, OSHA 10 CFR 1926, Subpart CC January 31, 2011 Rev. 1 Page 1 48135 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 152 /

  16. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    194 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 209 / Friday, October 30, 2009 / Notices ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER-FRL-8798-8] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at

  17. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    7189 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 242 / Friday, December 18, 2009 / Notices The potential costs associated with this proposed regulatory action are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and efficiently. In assessing the potential costs and benefits-both quantitative and qualitative-of this proposed regulatory action, we have determined that the benefits of the proposed priority justify the costs.

  18. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    97 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 6, 2010 / Notices 1 DOE anticipates that, pursuant to Cal. Pub. Res. Code section 21000 et seq., California agencies will impose mitigation measures to address potential impacts and project design elements to verify the sequestration of CO 2 injected for EOR. will meet to review, develop and provide recommendations on all aspects of the academic and administrative policies of the University; examine all aspects of professional military

  19. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    10 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations identified by a word and/or topic search, or by the Board docket number. Board decisions will continue to be provided in a widely-used format as future advances in technology occur. (2) Decisions issued prior to January 1, 1992. Decisions rendered by the Board of Veterans' Appeals prior to January 1, 1992, have been indexed to facilitate access to the contents of the decisions (BVA Index I-01-1). The index,

  20. Document

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... facilities in the definition of what could constitute ... about a number of political, regulatory and ... Agreement, but neither party is legally obligated to do ...

  1. Document

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... Determining whether an applicant has met this criterion is a decision committed by law to ... payment, rebate, subsidy, credit, tax benefit, or any other form of direct or ...

  2. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576-4025; Fax (865) 576-2347 or e-mail: halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at http:www.oakridge.doe.govem ssab. SUPPLEMENTARY...

  3. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    to the evaluation of both quantitative (i.e., performance assessment) and qualitative (i.e., assurance requirements) aspects of any compliance application. B. Content of...

  4. Document

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    not limited to, commercial banks, savings and loan institutions, insurance companies, factoring companies, investment banks, institutional investors, venture capital investment...

  5. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Under the National Environmental Policy Act G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 H. Review Under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of...

  6. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... on the reliability of the U.S. electric power supply system. ... Flux Test Facility Decommissioning EIS (FFTF EIS, DOE... with nine nuclear reactors and associated processing ...

  7. Document

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    372 TITLE 28-JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1495 EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 97-164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97-164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. § 1495. Damages for unjust conviction and im- prisonment; claim against United States The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim for damages by any person unjustly convicted of an offense against the United States and

  8. Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    File: ASCRHEPReqRevWPtemplate.docx | docx | 136 KB HEP Exascale Requirements Review Case Study Template June 2, 2015 | Download File: CaseStudyTemplate-HEPrev.docx | docx |...

  9. Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    | Date (low-high) | Date (high-low) | Source | Category HEP Exascale Requirements Review Case Study Template June 2, 2015 | Download File: CaseStudyTemplate-HEPrev.docx | docx |...

  10. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    66 29 CFR Ch. XIV (7-1-04 Edition) § 1614.101 1614.402 Time for appeals to the Commis- sion. 1614.403 How to appeal. 1614.404 Appellate procedure. 1614.405 Decisions on appeals. 1614.406 Time limits. [Reserved] 1614.407 Civil action: Title VII, Age Dis- crimination in Employment Act and Re- habilitation Act. 1614.408 Civil action: Equal Pay Act. 1614.409 Effect of filing a civil action. Subpart E-Remedies and Enforcement 1614.501 Remedies and relief. 1614.502 Compliance with final Commission

  11. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    2776 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Notices 161a); the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.); and the Commission's regulations in Title 10, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 7. Dated: December 17, 2007. Andrew L. Bates, Advisory Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. E7-24869 Filed 12-20-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Personnel Demonstration Project; Pay Banding and Performance-Based Pay Adjustments in the

  12. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    786 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 148 / Thursday, July 31, 2008 / Notices same file as the submission itself, and not as separate files. Petitions will be available for public inspection by appointment with the staff of the USTR Public Reading Room, except for information granted ''business confidential'' status pursuant to 15 CFR 2003.6. If the submission contains business confidential information, a non-confidential version of the submission must also be submitted that indicates where

  13. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... be available on the Advisory Committee's Web site, http: www.ed.govACSFA. To be ... Information regarding the Advisory Committee is available on the Committee's Web site, ...

  14. Document

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    agree upon the contents of the products before advising the Department to adopt the language. The Committee will function solely as an advisory body. The Secretary of Energy has...

  15. Document

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    or research work to be performed by a small business firm or domestic nonprofit organization, except where the work of the subaward contract is subject to an Exceptional...

  16. Document

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Appropriations Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277), requires Federal agencies to issue a Family Policymaking Assessment for any rule or policy that may affect family well- being....

  17. Document:

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL HYDROCARBON TRANSPORT AT THE UC-4 EMPLACEMENT HOLE, CENTRAL NEVADA TEST AREA prepared by Brad F. Lyles, Greg Pohll, Derek Sloop, Charalambos Papelis submitted to Nevada Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy September 1998 DOE/NV/11508-43 Publication No. 45167 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any of their

  18. Document:

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    DATA DECISION ANALYSIS: Project Shoal prepared by Greg Pohll, John Tracy, Frank Forsgren submitted to Nevada Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy January 1999 DOE/NV/11508-42 Publication No. 45166 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or

  19. Document

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    2009-0001, Sequence 6 Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-35; Introduction AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration...

  20. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Notices Security measures require that persons interested in attending the meeting must pre-register with us before 2 p.m., January 25, 2008. We cannot guarantee access for requests received after that time. To pre-register, please contact Ellen Cummings by telephone or send an e-mail to estuary.restoration@usace.army.mil. When leaving a voice mail message or sending an e-mail please provide the name of the individual attending, the

  1. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    28 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2011 / Notices information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any agency's ability to perform its statutory obligations. The Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the information collection. Each

  2. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    3 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 14, 2009 / Notices [FR Doc. E9-24538 Filed 10-13-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820-KF-C DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Adjusted Indemnification Amount AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of adjusted indemnification amount. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is announcing the adjusted amount of indemnification provided under subsection 170d. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (AEA), 42 U.S.C. 2210d., commonly known as the Price- Anderson

  3. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    90 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 33 / Wednesday, February 19, 2003 / Notices ACTION: Notice of availability of a Financial Assistance Solicitation. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the intent to issue Financial Assistance Solicitation No. DE-PS26-03NT41757- 0 entitled, ''Ground Breaking Innovative Technology Concepts For Mining.'' The Department of Energy (DOE), National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) is seeking white paper applications on behalf of the Energy Efficiency and Renewable

  4. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    5 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 14, 2009 / Notices 1 Additionally, the Department is developing a final rule to adopt similar certification and compliance regulations for the remaining types of covered commercial and industrial equipment covered by statute. See 64 FR 69598 (December 13, 1999); 71 FR 25104 (April 28, 2006); 71 FR 42193 (July 25, 2006); 71 FR 71341-42 (December 8, 2006). provisions for consumer products apply ''to the same extent and in the same manner''

  5. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    820 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 1997 / Notices Issued in Washington, DC on March 12, 1997. Dan W. Reicher, Chief of Staff, Department of Energy. [FR Doc. 97-6780 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P Office of General Counsel Unfunded Mandates Reform Act; Intergovernmental Consultation AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of final statement of policy. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) today publishes a final

  6. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    886 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 7, 2004 / Notices of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at: www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ index.html. Dated: June 30, 2004. Troy R. Justesen, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. [FR Doc. 04-15408 Filed 7-6-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-U DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Privacy Act of 1974; Notice of Amendment to an Existing System of Records AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice.

  7. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    4 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2004 / Notices V. Application Review Information Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are in 34 CFR 637.32. VI. Award Administration Information 1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notice (GAN). We may also notify you informally. If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, we notify you. 2.

  8. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    June 30, 2003 Part II Department of Energy Privacy Act of 1974; Publication of Compilation of Systems of Records; Notice VerDate Jan<31>2003 18:47 Jun 27, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\30JNN2.SGM 30JNN2 38756 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2003 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Privacy Act of 1974; Publication of Compilation of Systems of Records AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: As required by the Privacy Act of

  9. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    57 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 198 / Friday, October 10, 2008 / Notices Facilities Associated With the Caliente Rail Alignment DOE also has decided to construct and operate the Nevada Railroad Control Center and the National Transportation Operations Center, co- located with the Upland Staging Yard, along the Caliente alternative segment, rather than one mile from the southern boundary of the geologic repository operations area at the Rail Equipment Maintenance Yard. In making this

  10. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    05 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 16, 2008 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Department of Education. ACTION: Correction Notice. SUMMARY: On January 9, 2008, the Department of Education published a comment period notice in the Federal Register (Page 1609, Column 3) for the information collection, ''Common Core of Data Survey System.'' The abstract is hereby corrected to read, ''The Common Core of Data fiscal data

  11. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 19 / Friday, January 29, 2010 / Notices can bring the new highly energy efficient technology represented by the VRV-WIII product class to the market as soon as possible, thereby allowing the U.S. consumer to benefit from our high technology and high efficiency product, and from competition for other manufacturers who may have already received waivers. Confidential Information DACA makes no request to DOE for confidential treatment of any information contained in

  12. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    45 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Notices No decision will be made to implement any alternative until the U.S. Navy F-35C West Coast Homebasing EIS process is completed and a Record of Decision is signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Energy, Installations and Environment) or designee. Resource areas to be addressed in the U.S. Navy F-35C West Coast Homebasing EIS will include, but not be limited to: Air quality, noise environment, land use,

  13. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    56 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Notices www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and

  14. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    720 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also incorporates your approved application as part of your binding commitments under the grant. 3. Grant Administration: Projects funded under this competition are encouraged to budget for a two-day meeting for project directors

  15. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  16. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    875 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 20, 2000 / Notices characteristics, programs and services and achievements in multiple domains (e.g., employment, postsecondary education). The study will inform special education policy development and support Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measurement and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) reauthorization. Requests for copies of the proposed information collection request may be accessed from

  17. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    7006 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices DRAFT EIS PUBLIC HEARINGS Location Day, date, time Directions Jacumba Highland Center, 44681 Old Highway 80, Jacumba, Cali- fornia 91934. Tuesday, Octo- ber 5, 2010, 7-9 p.m. From the West, take I-8 East and take Exit 73 toward Jacumba. Turn right (South) onto Carrizo Gorge Road and drive South 1.1 miles. Turn right at Old Highway 80. Jacumba Highland Center will be on the left hand side. From the East, take I-8 West

  18. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    87 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 227 / Monday, November 24, 2008 / Notices a franchised service area. The electric energy which CSE proposes to export to Mexico would be surplus energy purchased from electric utilities, Federal power marketing agencies, and other entities within the United States. CSE proposes to export electric energy to Mexico and to arrange for the delivery of those exports over the international transmission facilities presently owned by AEP Texas Central, El Paso Electric

  19. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    1

  20. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    991 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 20, 2007 / Notices open to all students. The Secretary has set three performance indicators to measure this goal: (1) The number of States, including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, with charter school laws, (2) the number of charter schools in operation around the Nation, and (3) the percentage of charter school students who are achieving at or above the proficient level on State examinations in mathematics and reading.

  1. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    811 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 43 / Friday, March 6, 2009 / Notices the Defense Department Advisory Committee on Women in the Services. Individuals submitting a written statement must submit their statement to the Point of Contact listed above at the address detailed above NLT 5 p.m., Thursday, March 19, 2009. If a written statement is not received by Thursday, March 19, 2009, prior to the meeting, which is the subject of this notice, then it may not be provided to or considered by the

  2. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    416 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2004 / Notices Title II Requirements Payments; Court Case Update; Results from the HAVA College Poll Worker Program; Election Day Data Collection Update. The Commission will also receive presentations on EAC Election Day Activities and other items. Presentations will include: Election Day at the EAC Office; Election Day Reports from the Field; Election Day Summary; EAC Plan of Action for 2005. PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Bryan

  3. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    0 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 151 / Friday, August 7, 2009 / Notices DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on September 8, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination. ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Air Force Privacy Act Officer, Office of Warfighting Integration and Chief Information Officer, SAF/XCPPI, 1800 Air Force Pentagon, Suite 220, Washington, DC 20330-1800. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ben Swilley at (703)

  4. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    318 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices most current performance and financial expenditure information as specified by the Secretary in 34 CFR 75.118, 34 CFR 75.720 and in 34 CFR 606.31. 4. Performance Measures: The Secretary has established the following key performance measures for assessing the effectiveness of the Title III, Part A programs: (1) The number of full-time degree-seeking undergraduates enrolling at IHEs. Note that this is a long-term measure,

  5. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    784 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 231 / Friday, November 30, 2001 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Intent To Prepare A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Navigation Improvements at Unalaska, AK AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. ACTION: Notice of intent. SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District, intends to prepare a DEIS for navigation improvements at Unalaska, Alaska. The city of Unalaska, population 4,283, is on

  6. Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    279 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Notices ACTION: Notice of public meeting agenda. DATE AND TIME: Thursday, February 2, 2006, 10 a.m.-1 p.m. PLACE: Hyatt Regency (Valley Forge Room), 400 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20001. (Metro Stop: Union Station). AGENDA: The Commission will receive the following reports: Title II Requirements Payments Update; and updates on other administrative matters. The Commission will receive presentations on the following

  7. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    833 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 188 / Friday, September 26, 2008 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 13101-000] Barrington Hydro LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To Intervene, and Competing Applications September 19, 2008. On January 23, 2008, Barrington Hydro LLC filed an application, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study the feasibility of the

  8. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    3232 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 131 / Friday, July 10, 2009 / Notices 1 The Nuclear Posture Review is a congressionally mandated comprehensive review of U.S. nuclear deterrence policy and strategy that the Secretary of Defense will conduct in consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of State. The requirement for this review can be found in the National Defense Appropriations Act for 2008, Public Law 110-181. SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Advanced

  9. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    90 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Nuclear Security Administration Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM AGENCY: Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration. ACTION: Notice of intent. SUMMARY: The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), an agency within the U.S. Department

  10. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    4543 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 28, 2007 / Notices Relations or Ms. Julie J. Johnson, Assistant Director, Advisory Committee or Student Financial Assistance, Capitol Place, 80 F Street, NW., Suite 413, Washington, DC 20202-7582, (202) 219- 2099. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance is established under Section 491 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 as amended by Public Law 100-50 (20 U.S.C. 1098). The Advisory Committee

  11. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Occupational Safety and Health Admin., Labor § 1926.52 of continuous cloth toweling, conven- ient to the lavatories, shall be pro- vided. (4) Showers. (i) Whenever showers are required by a particular standard, the showers shall be provided in accord- ance with paragraphs (f)(4) (ii) through (v) of this section. (ii) One shower shall be provided for each 10 employees of each sex, or nu- merical fraction thereof, who are re- quired to shower during the same shift. (iii) Body soap or other

  12. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    2401 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 46 / Friday, March 7, 2008 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Fossil Energy Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee; Correction AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting Correction. The Department of Energy published a notice of open meeting announcing a meeting of the Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee, 73 FR 8863. In FR Doc. E8-2891, published on Friday, February 15, 2008, page 8863, under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, first column,

  13. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    3686 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 1999 / Notices management strategies can be implemented if the outcome of proposed management regimes is inconsistent with the HCP goals for the species. It is the Service's position that no additional measures are required to implement the intent and purpose of the HCP. National Environmental Policy Act Determination and Public Comment An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared to accompany this HCP due to the large scale

  14. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    federal register Wednesday December 8, 1999 Part III Department of Energy 10 CFR Part 850 Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program; Final Rule VerDate 29-OCT-99 10:58 Dec 07, 1999 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\A08DE0.189 pfrm04 PsN: 08DER3 68854 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 1999 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 850 [Docket No. EH-RM-98-BRYLM] RIN 1901-AA75 Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program AGENCY:

  15. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    5869 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 3, 2007 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The Historically Black Colleges and Universities Capital Financing Advisory Board AGENCY: The Historically Black Colleges and Universities Capital Financing Board, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice of an open meeting. SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of an upcoming open meeting of the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Capital Financing Advisory

  16. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    6691 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices Each meeting is scheduled for 6-8 p.m. with an open-house format, during which attendees are invited to speak one-on-one with agency and Project representatives. Project presentations will be given at 6:15 and 7:30 p.m. Attendees are welcome to come and go at their convenience throughout the meeting. The purpose of the scoping meetings is to provide information about the proposed Project, review Project maps, answer

  17. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    56260 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 209 / Friday, October 30, 2009 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 86, 87, 89, 90, 94, 98, 1033, 1039, 1042, 1045, 1048, 1051, 1054, 1065 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508; FRL-8963-5] RIN 2060-A079 Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: EPA is promulgating a regulation to require reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from all sectors of the economy. The final

  18. Document

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    22 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 19, 2010 / Notices the public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the application, including the conducting of any safety analyses. The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public comment on the application. The Agency reviews the safety analyses and the public comments, and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be

  19. Acceptable Documents for Identity Proofing

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    It is a requirement that the identity of a DOE Digital Identity Subscriber be verified against acceptable identity source documents. A Subscriber must appear in person and present their Federal...

  20. Renewable Fuels Module - NEMS Documentation

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2014-01-01

    This report documents the objectives, analytical approach, and design of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) Renewable Fuels Module (RFM) as it relates to the production of the Annual Energy Outlook forecasts.

  1. Industrial Demand Module - NEMS Documentation

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2014-01-01

    Documents the objectives, analytical approach, and development of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) Industrial Demand Module. The report catalogues and describes model assumptions, computational methodology, parameter estimation techniques, and model source code.

  2. Transportation Sector Module - NEMS Documentation

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2014-01-01

    Documents the objectives, analytical approach and development of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) Transportation Model (TRAN). The report catalogues and describes the model assumptions, computational methodology, parameter estimation techniques, model source code, and forecast results generated by the model.

  3. AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY:

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    INITIATED BY: http://nnsa.energy.gov/ NNSA Office of Nuclear Safety & Health NNSA/EM SUPPLEMENTAL DIRECTIVE Approved: 6-25-12 DIFFERING PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS (DPO) PROCESS NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SD G 442.2 NNSA/ EM SD G 442.2 1 6-25-12 DIFFERING PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS PROCESS (DPO) 1. PURPOSE. This guidance document describes the process used jointly by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and Office of Environmental

  4. Assessment Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Assessments » Assessment Documents Assessment Documents RSS January 8, 2016 EA Annual Report to Congress Secretary of Energy Ernest J. Moniz has submitted a report to Congress, "Office of Enterprise Assessments Fiscal Year 2015 Independent Oversight Activities Overview." December 30, 2015 Office of Enterprise Assessments Targeted Review of Work Planning and Control and Biological Safety at the Los Alamos National Laboratory - December 2015 Review of Work Planning and Control and

  5. Document Number Q0029500 Introduction

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Introduction 1.0 Introduction This Remedial Investigation (RI) AddendumRocused Feasibility Study (FFS) report updates the 1998 final RI and presents the results of a FFS conducted for Operable Unit (OU) 111, contaminated surface water and ground water, of the Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS). These documents are combined to promote better reference between the updated RI information and the remedy comparisons of the FFS. This document is prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Grand

  6. Assessment Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Services » Assessments » Assessment Documents Assessment Documents RSS December 30, 2015 Office of Enterprise Assessments Targeted Review of Work Planning and Control and Biological Safety at the Los Alamos National Laboratory - December 2015 Review of Work Planning and Control and Biological Safety at the Los Alamos National Laboratory December 29, 2015 Enterprise Assessments Targeted Review of the Safety System Management of the Secondary Confinement System and Power Distribution Safety

  7. Document Library | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Services » Document Library Document Library January 4, 2016 NEAC International Subcommittee Report for December 11, 2015 Meeting January 4, 2016 NEAC Fuel Cycle Research and Development Subcommittee Report for December 11, 2015 Meeting January 4, 2016 NEAC Nuclear Reactor Technology Subcommittee Report for December 11, 2015 Meeting January 4, 2016 MEETING MATERIALS: DECEMBER 11, 2015 Westin Crystal City Crystal Ballroom V (Located on the Second Floor) 1800 Jefferson Davis Highway Arlington, VA

  8. Enforcement Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Enforcement » Enforcement Documents Enforcement Documents RSS December 9, 2015 Consent Order, Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC Worker Safety and Health Enforcement Consent Order issued to Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC relating to an electrical shock event that occurred at the Brookhaven National Laboratory. December 9, 2015 Enforcement Letter, Armor Tower, Inc. Worker Safety and Health Enforcement Letter issued to Armor Tower, Inc. December 9, 2015 Enforcement Letter, Construction

  9. Other Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Documents Other Documents December 16, 2015 EA-2005: Floodplain Statement of Findings Chromium Plume Control Interim Measure and Plume-Center Characterization, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM June 24, 2014 EIS-0501: FERC Project Update Golden Pass LNG Export and Pipeline Project, Texas and Louisiana October 30, 2013 EIS-0283-S2: Amended Interim Action Determination Disposition of Certain Plutonium Materials at the K-Area Complex, Savannah River Site April 25, 2013 EIS-0283-S2:

  10. Department of Energy Quadrennial Technology Review Framing Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Quadrennial Technology Review Framing Document http://energy.gov/QTR 3/14/2011 U.S. Department of ENERGY 2 The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has initiated a review of its energy technology activities (Quadrennial Technology Review, or QTR). This framing document is a principal means of facilitating stakeholder engagement in that process. It describes the nation's energy landscape and challenges, identifies important research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) policy choices to

  11. Microsoft Word - Document1 | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Document1 Microsoft Word - Document1 PDF icon Microsoft Word - Document1 More Documents & Publications 2004 Program Review Meeting 2002 Program Review Meeting Project Reports for Standing Rock Sioux Tribe - 2012 Project

  12. EIS-0286: Notice of Revised Scope | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Notice of Revised Scope EIS-0286: Notice of Revised Scope Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has decided to revise the...

  13. Cryptographic Trust Management System Design Document

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Edgar, Thomas W.; Clements, Samuel L.; Hadley, Mark D.; Maiden, Wendy M.; Manz, David O.; Zabriskie, Sean J.

    2010-08-04

    Deliverable for DOE NSTB Cryptographic Trust Management project. Design document to follow the Requirements document submitted in Sept 2009.

  14. VPP Program Document | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Program Document VPP Program Document VPP Program Document PDF icon VPP Program Document part I PDF icon VPP Program Document Part II PDF icon VPP Program Document Part III PDF icon VPP Program Document Part IV More Documents & Publications Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Idaho Cleanup Project- June 2007 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - March 2009 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, CH2M HILL Analytical Technical Services - January

  15. DOE Exascale Initiative | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Exascale Initiative DOE Exascale Initiative A briefing to the Secretary's Energy Advisory Board on exascale computing prepared by: Dimitri Kusnezov, Senior Advisor to the Secretary, US DOE Steve Binkley, Senior Advisor, Office of Science, US DOE Bill Harrod, Office of Science/ASCR Bob Meisner, Defense Programs/ASC PDF icon DOE Exascale Initiative (pdf) More Documents & Publications Report of the Task Force on Next Generation High Performance Computing Class Patent Waiver W(C)2012-003 Volume

  16. DOE Requests Information on Potential New or Revised Categorical...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    DOE Requests Information on Potential New or Revised Categorical Exclusions DOE Requests Information on Potential New or Revised Categorical Exclusions December 22, 2009 - 10:33am...

  17. Attachment 2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Attachment 2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green Lease Text Attachment 2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green Lease Text PDF icon Solicitation for...

  18. Attachment 2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green Lease Text Attachment 2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green Lease Text PDF icon Solicitation for Offers ...

  19. Commercial Grade Dedication Record (ANL-746 Revised) | Department...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Record (ANL-746 Revised) Commercial Grade Dedication Record (ANL-746 Revised) A sample of a process to recorddocument CGD activities. Forms are included. Commercial Grade...

  20. SunShot Initiative Chart | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    SunShot Initiative Chart SunShot Initiative Chart Enlarged version of SunShot Initiative chart. Image icon lcoewithcoins.jpg More Documents & Publications SunShot Concentrating Solar Power Program SunShot Initiative 2014 Portfolio Overview EERE Science and Technology Policy (STP) Fellowships Application Form

  1. Document Library | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    initiated within DOE's disposal research program. September 30, 2012 Cast Stainless Steel Aging Research Plan This work plan proposes to build a systematic knowledge base for...

  2. State and Regional Hydrogen Initiatives Meeting, Challenges for State and

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regional Hydrogen Initiatives | Department of Energy and Regional Hydrogen Initiatives Meeting, Challenges for State and Regional Hydrogen Initiatives State and Regional Hydrogen Initiatives Meeting, Challenges for State and Regional Hydrogen Initiatives These notes from the State and Regional Hydrogen Initiatives Meeting in March 2007 provides discussion points from the Coalition Management Breakout Session. PDF icon coalition_management_nordstrom.pdf More Documents & Publications

  3. Strategic Initiatives Work Group Status Overview - July 2012 | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy July 2012 Strategic Initiatives Work Group Status Overview - July 2012 Documents Available for Download PDF icon July 2012 Status Overviews More Documents & Publications Strategic Initiatives Work Group Status Overview - September 2012 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview - July 2012 Workforce Retention Work Group Status Overview - July 2012

  4. Strategic Initiatives Work Group Status Overview - September 2012 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy September 2012 Strategic Initiatives Work Group Status Overview - September 2012 Documents Available for Download PDF icon September 2012 Status Overviews More Documents & Publications Strategic Initiatives Work Group Status Overview - July 2012 Focus Group Meeting (Activities Status) Focus Group Meeting (Topical Wrap-Up)

  5. Initial Radionuclide Inventories

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    H. Miller

    2004-09-19

    The purpose of this analysis is to provide an initial radionuclide inventory (in grams per waste package) and associated uncertainty distributions for use in the Total System Performance Assessment for the License Application (TSPA-LA) in support of the license application for the repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. This document is intended for use in postclosure analysis only. Bounding waste stream information and data were collected that capture probable limits. For commercially generated waste, this analysis considers alternative waste stream projections to bound the characteristics of wastes likely to be encountered using arrival scenarios that potentially impact the commercial spent nuclear fuel (CSNF) waste stream. For TSPA-LA, this radionuclide inventory analysis considers U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) high-level radioactive waste (DHLW) glass and two types of spent nuclear fuel (SNF): CSNF and DOE-owned (DSNF). These wastes are placed in two groups of waste packages: the CSNF waste package and the codisposal waste package (CDSP), which are designated to contain DHLW glass and DSNF, or DHLW glass only. The radionuclide inventory for naval SNF is provided separately in the classified ''Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Technical Support Document'' for the License Application. As noted previously, the radionuclide inventory data presented here is intended only for TSPA-LA postclosure calculations. It is not applicable to preclosure safety calculations. Safe storage, transportation, and ultimate disposal of these wastes require safety analyses to support the design and licensing of repository equipment and facilities. These analyses will require radionuclide inventories to represent the radioactive source term that must be accommodated during handling, storage and disposition of these wastes. This analysis uses the best available information to identify the radionuclide inventory that is expected at the last year of last emplacement, currently identified as 2030 and 2033, depending on the type of waste. TSPA-LA uses the results of this analysis to decay the inventory to the year of repository closure projected for the year of 2060.

  6. Radiological control manual. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kloepping, R.

    1996-05-01

    This Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Radiological Control Manual (LBNL RCM) has been prepared to provide guidance for site-specific additions, supplements and interpretation of the DOE Radiological Control Manual. The guidance provided in this manual is one methodology to implement the requirements given in Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 835 (10 CFR 835) and the DOE Radiological Control Manual. Information given in this manual is also intended to provide demonstration of compliance to specific requirements in 10 CFR 835. The LBNL RCM (Publication 3113) and LBNL Health and Safety Manual Publication-3000 form the technical basis for the LBNL RPP and will be revised as necessary to ensure that current requirements from Rules and Orders are represented. The LBNL RCM will form the standard for excellence in the implementation of the LBNL RPP.

  7. Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 326: Areas 6 and 27 Release Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Grant Evenson

    2009-05-01

    This document constitutes an addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 326: Areas 6 and 27 Release Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 1), December 2002 as described in the document Supplemental Investigation Report for FFACO Use Restrictions, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (SIR) dated November 2008. The SIR document was approved by NDEP on December 5, 2008. The approval of the SIR document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR removals. In conformance with the SIR document, this addendum consists of: This page that refers the reader to the SIR document for additional information The cover, title, and signature pages of the SIR document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the SIR document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the UR for CAS 06-25-01, CP-1 Heating Oil Release. This UR was established as part of a Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) corrective action and is based on the presence of contaminants at concentrations greater than the action levels established at the time of the initial investigation (FFACO, 1996). Since this UR was established, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective actions (RBCA) have changed. Therefore, this UR was reevaluated against the current RBCA criteria as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006). This re-evaluation consisted of comparing the original data (used to define the need for the UR) to risk-based final action levels (FALs) developed using the current Industrial Sites RBCA process. The re-evaluation resulted in a recommendation to remove the UR because contamination is not present at the site above the risk-based FALs. Requirements for inspecting and maintaining this UR will be canceled, and the postings and signage at this site will be removed. Fencing and posting may be present at this site that are unrelated to the FFACO UR such as for radiological control purposes as required by the NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual (NNSA/NSO, 2004). This modification will not affect or modify any non-FFACO requirements for fencing, posting, or monitoring at this site.

  8. Document: NA Actionee: Dorothy Riehie

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    SI T op Document: NA Actionee: Dorothy Riehie - 04 2 Document Date: 11/01/2012 Due Date: NO ACTION Author: JOHNSON M Addressee: RIEHLE D ~71ES (), Title: Re: Freedom Of Information Act Request DIR DIV NAME DIR DIV NAME MGR AMRP DEP AMRP CPD AMB AMRP RCD AMB BUD AMISE AMB FIN AMISE EMD AMB HRM AMISE OOD AMIB PRO AMISE SED AMMIS 0CC AMMIS SES OCE Riehle, Dorothy (Actionee) AMIMS ISI ORP AMMS PlC PNSO AMMS SSD RLCI Comments: Original to D. Riehle. Records Schedule Information: ADM-1.28.1 Scan?: Yes

  9. SciTech Connect: Document Availability

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Document Availability Document Availability SciTech Connect contains over 2.4 million bibliographic citations and over 307,000 full-text documents, primarily from 1943 forward. When an electronic document is available, an indicator is provided in the search results and on the bibliographic citation page. The electronic document may be accessed via a link to the document. To view an electronic document, click on the icon. (You must have Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed.) To download an

  10. Macroeconomic Activity Module - NEMS Documentation

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2014-01-01

    Documents the objectives, analytical approach, and development of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) Macroeconomic Activity Module (MAM) used to develop the Annual Energy Outlook for 2014 (AEO2014). The report catalogues and describes the module assumptions, computations, methodology, parameter estimation techniques, and mainframe source code

  11. Coal Market Module - NEMS Documentation

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2014-01-01

    Documents the objectives and the conceptual and methodological approach used in the development of the National Energy Modeling System's (NEMS) Coal Market Module (CMM) used to develop the Annual Energy Outlook 2014 (AEO2014). This report catalogues and describes the assumptions, methodology, estimation techniques, and source code of CMM's two submodules. These are the Coal Production Submodule (CPS) and the Coal Distribution Submodule (CDS).

  12. Commercial Demand Module - NEMS Documentation

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2014-01-01

    Documents the objectives, analytical approach and development of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) Commercial Sector Demand Module. The report catalogues and describes the model assumptions, computational methodology, parameter estimation techniques, model source code, and forecast results generated through the synthesis and scenario development based on these components.

  13. Documentation - Laboratory for Laser Energetics

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    VII System Description Chapter 1: System Overview Chapter 2: Laser Sources (final draft material) Chapter 3: Laser Amplifiers Chapter 4: Power Conditioning Chapter 5: Optomechanical System Chapter 6: Laser Diagnostics Chapter 7: Experimental System Chapter 8: Control System Chapter 9: Facility and Safety Interlocks Comments Address document comments, questions and corrections to the OMEGA EP Associate Laser Facility Manager

  14. Used Fuel Disposition R&D Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Initiatives » Fuel Cycle Technologies » Used Fuel Disposition Research & Development » Used Fuel Disposition R&D Documents Used Fuel Disposition R&D Documents September 26, 2014 Results of Stainless Steel Canister Corrosion Studies and Environmental Sample Investigations. This report documents experimental work evaluating localized corrosion of container and canister materials performed at Sandia National Laboratories. The report also documents the results of analyses of the dust

  15. Document creation, linking, and maintenance system

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Claghorn, Ronald (Pasco, WA)

    2011-02-15

    A document creation and citation system designed to maintain a database of reference documents. The content of a selected document may be automatically scanned and indexed by the system. The selected documents may also be manually indexed by a user prior to the upload. The indexed documents may be uploaded and stored within a database for later use. The system allows a user to generate new documents by selecting content within the reference documents stored within the database and inserting the selected content into a new document. The system allows the user to customize and augment the content of the new document. The system also generates citations to the selected content retrieved from the reference documents. The citations may be inserted into the new document in the appropriate location and format, as directed by the user. The new document may be uploaded into the database and included with the other reference documents. The system also maintains the database of reference documents so that when changes are made to a reference document, the author of a document referencing the changed document will be alerted to make appropriate changes to his document. The system also allows visual comparison of documents so that the user may see differences in the text of the documents.

  16. Hanford Site Wide Transportation Safety Document [SEC 1 Thru 3

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    MCCALL, D L

    2002-06-01

    This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the basis for the US Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office (RL) to approve the Hanford Sitewide Transportation Safety Document (TSD) for onsite Transportation and Packaging (T&P) at Hanford. Hanford contractors, on behalf of DOE-RL, prepared and submitted the Hanford Sitewide Transportation Safety Document, DOE/RL-2001-0036, Revision 0, (DOE/RL 2001), dated October 4, 2001, which is referred to throughout this report as the TSD. In the context of the TSD, Hanford onsite shipments are the activities of moving hazardous materials, substances, and wastes between DOE facilities and over roadways where public access is controlled or restricted and includes intra-area and inter-area movements. The TSD sets forth requirements and standards for onsite shipment of radioactive and hazardous materials and wastes within the confines of the Hanford Site on roadways where public access is restricted by signs, barricades, fences, or other means including road closures and moving convoys controlled by Hanford Site security forces.

  17. IEC documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    link to facebook link to twitter Email Signup Sign up for updates Go Search form Search Office of International Affairs Office of International Affairs Services Initiatives Initiatives Home Climate Action Plan Clean Energy Ministerial DOC-DOE Joint Trade Mission to China Energy and Climate Partnership of the Americas International Commitments International Commitments Home Primer Glossary & Acronyms International Energy Agency Turkey Near-Zero Zone U.S.-Africa Energy Ministerial U.S.-Canada

  18. Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Import Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Link to Main Report RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: COVER SHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office TITLE: Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286D2) CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland

  19. Revised Master Plan for the Hood River Production Program, Technical Report 2008.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation

    2008-04-28

    The Hood River Production Program (HRPP) is a Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) funded program initiated as a mitigation measure for Columbia River hydrosystem effects on anadromous fish. The HRPP began in the early 1990s with the release of spring Chinook and winter steelhead smolts into the basin. Prior to implementation, co-managers, including the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife drafted the Hood River Production Master Plan (O'Toole and ODFW 1991a; O'Toole and ODFW 1991b) and the Pelton Ladder Master Plan (Smith and CTWSR 1991). Both documents were completed in 1991 and subsequently approved by the Council in 1992 and authorized through a BPA-led Environmental Impact Statement in 1996. In 2003, a 10-year programmatic review was conducted for BPA-funded programs in the Hood River (Underwood et al. 2003). The primary objective of the HRPP Review (Review) was to determine if program goals were being met, and if modifications to program activities would be necessary in order to meet or revise program goals. In 2003, an agreement was signed between PacifiCorp and resource managers to remove the Powerdale Dam (RM 10) and associated adult trapping facility by 2010. The HRPP program has been dependant on the adult trap to collect broodstock for the hatchery programs; therefore, upon the dam's removal, some sort of replacement for the trap would be needed to continue the HRPP. At the same time the Hood River Subbasin Plan (Coccoli 2004) was being written and prompted the co-managers to considered future direction of the program. This included revising the numerical adult fish objectives based on the assimilated data and output from several models run on the Hood River system. In response to the Review as well as the Subbasin Plan, and intensive monitoring and evaluation of the current program, the HRPP co-managers determined the spring Chinook program was not achieving the HRPP's defined smolt-to-adult (SAR) survival rate guidelines. The observed low SAR was due to precocity, straying, and incidence of BKD in the spring Chinook program; which ultimately led to the program's inability to achieve the subbasin's overly optimistic biological fish objectives. The summer steelhead hatchery program was not providing the fishery or population benefits anticipated and will be discontinued. The winter steelhead program was performing as planned and no changes are foreseen. This updated Master Plan addresses the several proposed changes to the existing HRPP, which are described.

  20. ARM - Publications: Science Team Meeting Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Revised Treatment of Cirrus Microphysics on the Radiation Budget of the Unified Model Edwards, J.M. (a), Mitchell, D.L. (b), Ivanova, D. (b), and Wilson, D.R. (a), Met Office,...

  1. Widget:DocumentURL | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    DocumentURL Jump to: navigation, search This widget will return the URL for the HTML document. Parameters include: none For example: Widget:DocumentURL Retrieved from "http:...

  2. Microsoft Word - Document2 | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Document2 Microsoft Word - Document2 More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - ARRAAttachment12v1.doc Microsoft Word - Frequently_Asked_Questions Microsoft Word - DRAFT CRB Interview Guidance.doc

  3. Standards Development and Revision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Standards Development and Revision Standards Development and Revision Beginning in the 1970s, Congress enacted a series of laws that established or directed the Department of Energy (DOE) to establish energy efficiency standards for certain appliances and commercial equipment. In addition, DOE is required to review existing standards for covered products at least once every six years and to set standards at levels that achieve the maximum improvement in energy efficiency that is

  4. Lapse Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Lapse Documents Lapse Documents PDF icon DOE Order 137.1b.pdf PDF icon OMB guidance 9-17-13 M-13-22.pdf PDF icon OPM Guidance for Shutdown Furloughs (9-30-13).pdf PDF icon OMB guidance 9-30-13 M-13-24.pdf PDF icon OMB Circ. A-11 section 124 (Ops in Absence of Approps).pdf PDF icon M-96-01(November 9, 1995).pdf PDF icon M-96-02(November 13, 1995).pdf PDF icon M-96-03(November 14, 1995).pdf PDF icon M-96-07(December 14, 1995).pdf PDF icon M-96-08(December 16, 1995).pdf PDF icon M-96-09(December

  5. Engineering Basis Document Review Supporting the Double Shell Tank (DST) System Specification Development

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    LEONARD, M.W.

    2000-03-14

    The Double-Shell Tank (DST) System is required to transition from its current storage mission to a storage and retrieval mission supporting the River Protection Project Phase 1 privatization, defined in HNF-SD-WM-MAR-008, Tank Waste Remediation System Mission Analysis Report. Requirements for the DST subsystems are being developed using the top-down systems engineering process outlined in HNF-SD-WM-SEMP-002, Tank Waste Remediation System Systems Engineering Management Plan. This top-down process considers existing designs to the extent that these designs impose unavoidable constraints on the Phase 1 mission. Existing engineering-basis documents were screened, and the unavoidable constraints were identified. The constraints identified herein will be added to the DST System specification (HNF-SD-WM-TRD-007, System Specification for the Double-Shell Tank System). While the letter revisions of the DST System specification were constructed with a less rigorous review of the existing engineering-basis documents, the Revision 0 release of the specification must incorporate the results of the review documented herein. The purpose of this document is to describe the screening process and criteria used to determine which constraints are unavoidable and to document the screening results.

  6. ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT 1 The Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) and Indian Preference Statutes and Preferences August 5, 2011 I. Background Issue: Does Section 2602(d) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-58) (EPAct) Indian preference program have the necessary language to permit the use of noncompetitive procedures because EPAct provides for procurement procedures "otherwise expressly authorized by statute"? * Short answer: Yes. The plain language and

  7. Documentation - Laboratory for Laser Energetics

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    IX Subsystem Startup and Shutdown Procedures Shot Director Operating Procedures (S-AB-P-010) Laser Sources Operating Procedures (S-AB-P-011) Power Conditioning Operating Procedures (S-AB-P-012) Beamlines Operating Procedures (S-AB-P-013) Experimental System Operating Procedures (S-AB-P-014) Comments Address document comments, questions and corrections to the OMEGA EP Associate Laser Facility Manager. For additional information contact: Director's Administrator University of Rochester -

  8. Documentation - Laboratory for Laser Energetics

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    VIII System Shot Operations Manual Volume VIII Index (S-AB-P-157) Shot Director Operating Checklists Laser Sources Power Conditioning Beamlines Experimental Systems Experimental Diagnostics Comments Address document comments, questions and corrections to the OMEGA EP Associate Laser Facility Manager. For additional information contact: Director's Administrator University of Rochester - Laboratory for Laser Energetics, 250 E. River Rd, Rochester, NY 14623-1299 Last updated: November 14

  9. Fermilab | Directorate | Fermilab Directorate Documents

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Fermilab Directorate Documents Red-Bulleted Items are Restricted to Fermilab Green-Bulleted Items are Unrestricted Final Report of Injury Reduction Plan 2006 Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 between US DOE and Fermi Research Alliance, LLC Institutional Plan 2004-2008 PFX:Procedures for Researchers Fermilab Engineering Manual ; Appendices; Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Note: The Appendices & Risk Assessment Spreadsheet are also linked from the title page of the Fermilab Enginerring Manual

  10. Cray XC30 User Documentation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Software and Tools Coarray Fortran cChapel Shared and Dynamic Libraries Cluster Compatibility Mode Debugging and Profiling Performance and Optimization Cray XC30 Documentation Alva - Test and Development System for Edison HPX - 5 on Edison, Cori and Babbage PDSF Genepool Testbeds Retired Systems Storage & File Systems Data & Analytics Connecting to NERSC Queues and Scheduling Job Logs & Statistics Application Performance Training & Tutorials Software Policies User Surveys NERSC

  11. Document ID Number: RL-721

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ---------------------------------------------------------- Document ID Number: RL-721 REV 4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00066 I. Project Title: Nesting Bird Deterrent Study at the 241-C Tank Farm CX B3.8, "Outdoor Terrestrial Ecological and Environmental Research" II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings,

  12. ISDAC Flight Planning Document: Overview

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Applications Greg McFarquhar ISDAC Breakout Session ARM Science Team Meeting 10-13 March 2008, Norfolk, Virginia. ISDAC Applications * Described in Appendix of flight overview document - Description of needed profiles - Description of probes needed to make measurements to meet applications - Applications listed separately for clouds and aerosols Cloud water closure * Science Motivation: Compare measured bulk cloud water with that calculated by integrating measured size distribution-important

  13. Supplemental information source document : socioeconomics.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Sedore, Lora Jeannette

    2010-08-01

    This document provides information on expenditures and staffing levels at Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM). This report is based on the best available information obtained from Sandia Corporation for Fiscal Years 2008 and 2009, and was prepared in support of future analyses, including those that may be performed as part of the SNL/NM Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement.

  14. Secure NEPA Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents The Department of Energy (DOE) limits electronic access to certain NEPA documents on this website due to the potential security sensitivity of some information these documents may contain. DOE regrets any inconvenience caused by this decision, which reflects an awareness of the need to protect the public. Requesting Secure NEPA Documents You may request copies of documents by e-mail or by leaving a message on our toll-free information line at

  15. Mixed waste characterization reference document

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-09-01

    Waste characterization and monitoring are major activities in the management of waste from generation through storage and treatment to disposal. Adequate waste characterization is necessary to ensure safe storage, selection of appropriate and effective treatment, and adherence to disposal standards. For some wastes characterization objectives can be difficult and costly to achieve. The purpose of this document is to evaluate costs of characterizing one such waste type, mixed (hazardous and radioactive) waste. For the purpose of this document, waste characterization includes treatment system monitoring, where monitoring is a supplement or substitute for waste characterization. This document establishes a cost baseline for mixed waste characterization and treatment system monitoring requirements from which to evaluate alternatives. The cost baseline established as part of this work includes costs for a thermal treatment technology (i.e., a rotary kiln incinerator), a nonthermal treatment process (i.e., waste sorting, macronencapsulation, and catalytic wet oxidation), and no treatment (i.e., disposal of waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)). The analysis of improvement over the baseline includes assessment of promising areas for technology development in front-end waste characterization, process equipment, off gas controls, and monitoring. Based on this assessment, an ideal characterization and monitoring configuration is described that minimizes costs and optimizes resources required for waste characterization.

  16. Revision of the DELFIC Particle Activity Module

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hooper, David A; Jodoin, Vincent J

    2010-09-01

    The Defense Land Fallout Interpretive Code (DELFIC) was originally released in 1968 as a tool for modeling fallout patterns and for predicting exposure rates. Despite the continual advancement of knowledge of fission yields, decay behavior of fission products, and biological dosimetry, the decay data and logic of DELFIC have remained mostly unchanged since inception. Additionally, previous code revisions caused a loss of conservation of radioactive nuclides. In this report, a new revision of the decay database and the Particle Activity Module is introduced and explained. The database upgrades discussed are replacement of the fission yields with ENDF/B-VII data as formatted in the Oak Ridge Isotope Generation (ORIGEN) code, revised decay constants, revised exposure rate multipliers, revised decay modes and branching ratios, and revised boiling point data. Included decay logic upgrades represent a correction of a flaw in the treatment of the fission yields, extension of the logic to include more complex decay modes, conservation of nuclides (including stable nuclides) at all times, and conversion of key variables to double precision for nuclide conservation. Finally, recommended future work is discussed with an emphasis on completion of the overall radiation physics upgrade, particularly for dosimetry, induced activity, decay of the actinides, and fractionation.

  17. Microsoft Word - Document1 | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Microsoft Word - Document1 More Documents & Publications 2004 FUEL ECONOMY GUIDE BEST IN CLASS EPA Mobile Source Rule Update 2010 Vehicle Technologies Market Report...

  18. FTP Document Upload Website | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    FTP Document Upload Website Abstract The Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division's (DWGPD) File Transfer Protocol (FTP) document upload website. The DWGPD is a division...

  19. Documents and Publications | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    and Publications Documents and Publications Real Estate Documents Acquisition Guide for Federal Agencies Certified Reality Specialist Biography DOJ Title Standards for Acquisition...

  20. Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas From the US Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas From the US...