Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Manhattan Project: The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

(Unofficial) MED emblem, 1946 THE MANHATTAN ENGINEER DISTRICT (Unofficial) MED emblem, 1946 THE MANHATTAN ENGINEER DISTRICT (1945-1946) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present With the end of the Second World War, American policymakers anticipated that the Manhattan Project's infrastructure would be turned over to and managed by a largely civilian commission. General Leslie Groves initially thought this would happen soon after the ending of hostilities. His strategy for interim management of the complex was thus one of "hold the line," where he sought to maintain the essential soundness of the physical plant and the personnel that ran it, complete ongoing construction, and promote efficiency and economy. One of his first decisions was to close down marginal operations such as the S-50 Thermal Diffusion Plant in the K-25 area and the Alpha racetracks of the Y-12 electromagnetic separations plant at Oak Ridge. His most serious short-term problem was in retaining personnel, particularly at Los Alamos where many scientists and technicians were eager to return to civilian pursuits.

2

MANHATTAN PROJECT NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department, as the direct descendent of the Manhattan Engineer District, owns and manages the Federal properties at most of the major Manhattan Project sites, including Oak Ridge, Tennessee;...

3

The Manhattan Project  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Project Project Sites and Their Contributions · Key Events · Scientists · Its Story · Additional Information · Related Information President Roosevelt Establishes the Manhattan Project President Roosevelt instructs the Army to take responsibility for construction of atomic weapons complex. The Army delegates the task to the Corps of Engineers, which establishes the Manhattan Engineer District. Courtesy of National Nuclear Security Administration The 70th anniversary of the establishment of the Manhattan Project on August 13, 1942, is celebrated this year. The Manhattan Project played an essential role in bringing World War II to an end through the building of the atomic bomb. This major achievement was possible because the U.S. government conducted a massive, secret, nationwide enterprise that took science from the laboratory and into combat with an entirely new type of weapon.

4

MANHATTAN PROJECT | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

MANHATTAN PROJECT MANHATTAN PROJECT MANHATTAN PROJECT MANHATTAN PROJECT The Department of Energy traces its origins to World War II and the Manhattan Project effort to build the first atomic bomb. As the direct descendent of the Manhattan Engineer District, the organization set up by the Army Corps of Engineers to develop and build the bomb, the Department continues to own and manage the Federal properties at most of the major Manhattan Project sites, including Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Hanford, Washington; and Los Alamos, New Mexico. In a national survey at the turn of the millennium, both journalists and the public ranked the dropping of the atomic bomb and the end of the Second World War as the top news stories of the twentieth-century. The Manhattan Project is the story of some of the most renowned scientists of the century

5

Manhattan Project: Fuller Lodge  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

FULLER LODGE FULLER LODGE Los Alamos Boys Ranch School and Los Alamos (The Town) Resources > Photo Gallery Fuller Lodge Fuller Lodge was one of the main structures of the Los Alamos Boys Ranch School, serving as its headquarters in its later years. It was converted into a mess hall and guest quarters during the Manhattan Project. In the photograph above, part of the guest house is visible in the distance to the right. The photograph above is courtesy the Los Alamos National Laboratory. It is also reproduced in Edith C. Truslow, with Kasha V. Thayer, ed., Manhattan Engineer District: Nonscientific Aspects of Los Alamos Project Y, 1942 through 1946 (Los Alamos, NM: Manhattan Engineer District, ca. 1946; first printed by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory as LA-5200, March 1973; reprinted in 1997 by the Los Alamos Historical Society), 57. The additional photographs below are:

6

Manhattan Project: Library  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

LIBRARY LIBRARY Resources A number of government publications relating to the Manhattan Project are available either as web pages or as .pdf documents. Cover of the Manhattan Project publication Department of Energy Publications Fehner and Gosling, Origins of the Nevada Test Site Fehner and Gosling, Battlefield of the Cold War: The Nevada Test Site Gosling, Manhattan Project, 1999 Gosling, Manhattan Project, 2010 Harnessed Atom United States Nuclear Tests, 1945-1992 Wahlen, History of 100-B Area Los Alamos National Laboratory Publications Bainbridge, Trinity Fakley, "The British Mission" Hawkins, MDH: Project Y, Vol. 1 Los Alamos: Beginning of an Era, 1943-1945 Malik, Yields of Hiroshima and Nagasaki "Oppenheimer Years" Serber, Los Alamos Primer Truslow, MDH: Project Y, Vol. 2

7

Manhattan Project: Maps  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

MAPS MAPS Resources Scroll down to view thumbnails of each map. Leslie Groves looks at a map of Japan. Manhattan Project: General Manhattan Project Facilities Places map "Signature Facilities of the MED" map Hanford Hanford map Hanford (black and white) map Hanford Site Diagram Hanford Site Location Map Hanford: Native Peoples map Hanford: Town map Los Alamos Map of Los Alamos, New Mexico Los Alamos: "Tech Area" map Oak Ridge Map of Clinton Engineer Works, Oak Ridge Clinton Engineer Works, Oak Ridge (black and white) map Oak Ridge: Projected Site for Atomic Production Plants, 1942, map Other Flight paths for Hiroshima and Nagasaki missions map Map of the Trinity Test Site Post-War U.S. Nuclear Tests map Manhattan Project Facilities Manhattan Project Facilities

8

Manhattan Project: Places  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Places Places "Met Lab" (Metallurgical Laboratory) Oak Ridge: Clinton Engineer Works Hanford Engineer Works Los Alamos Other Places Places of the Manhattan Project Places PLEASE NOTE: The Places pages are not yet available. Links to the pages listed below and to the left will be activated as content is developed. Select topics relating to the places where the Manhattan Project occurred have been grouped into the categories listed to the left. A quick overview of places involved in the Manhattan Project can be obtained by reading the summary pages for each of the categories, located in the left navigation bar. Each summary page also has a listing of all the subtopics included within that category. For a complete menu of all place pages, see the comprehensive list of topics below.

9

Manhattan Project: People Images  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

PEOPLE IMAGES PEOPLE IMAGES Resources > Photo Gallery Scroll down to see each of these images individually. The images are: 1. J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Ernest Lawrence (courtesy the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory); 2. Hanford, Washington, workers sending money home (reproduced from the photo insert in F. G. Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb (Washington: History Division, Department of Energy, October 2001)); 3. Oppenheimer and Leslie Groves at the Trinity Site, September 1945 (reproduced from the cover of the Office of History and Heritage Resources publication: The Signature Facilities of the Manhattan Project (Washington: History Division, Department of Energy, 2001)); 4. A WAC detachment marching at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, June 1945 (courtesy the Army Corps of Engineers; it is reprinted in Rachel Fermi and Esther Samra, Picturing the Bomb: Photographs from the Secret World of the Manhattan Project (New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., Publishers, 1995), 40);

10

Manhattan Project: Suggested Readings  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SUGGESTED READINGS SUGGESTED READINGS Resources > Readings The literature on the Manhattan Project is extensive. The purpose of this web page is not to catalogue it, but only to suggest a very select few places to start. For more exhaustive lists of secondary works relating to the early history of nuclear energy, consult the bibliographies of the books listed below. Suggested Surveys of the Manhattan Project Gosling, F. G. The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb. DOE/MA-0001; Washington: History Division, Department of Energy, January 1999. An overview history by the Chief Historian of the Department of Energy and the basis for most of the "Events" in this web site. The best short survey for the general reader. Revised with additional photographs in January 2010 as DOE/MA-0002 Revised and available in .pdf format.

11

Manhattan Project: Science  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Science Science In the Laboratory Particle Accelerators and Other Technologies The Atom and Atomic Structure Nuclear Physics Bomb Design and Components Radioactivity Science and technology of the Manhattan Project Science PLEASE NOTE: The Science pages are not yet available. Links to the pages listed below and to the left will be activated as content is developed. Select topics relating to the science and technology of the Manhattan Project have been grouped into the categories listed to the left. A quick overview of scientific topics useful for understanding the Manhattan Project can be obtained by reading the summary pages for each of the categories, located in the left navigation bar. Each summary page also has a listing of all the subtopics included within that category. For a complete menu of all science pages, see the comprehensive list of topics below.

12

Manhattan Project: Tech Area Gallery  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SMALL) SMALL) Los Alamos: The Laboratory Resources > Photo Gallery All of the photographs below are of the "Tech Area" at Los Alamos during or shortly after the wartime years. If you have a fast internet connection, you may wish to click here for a photo gallery with larger versions of the same images. There is a map of the Tech Area at the top and again at the bottom. The first image below is courtesy the Los Alamos National Laboratory. All of the other photographs are reproduced from Edith C. Truslow, with Kasha V. Thayer, ed., Manhattan Engineer District: Nonscientific Aspects of Los Alamos Project Y, 1942 through 1946 (Los Alamos, NM: Manhattan Engineer District, ca. 1946; first printed by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory as LA-5200, March 1973; reprinted in 1997 by the Los Alamos Historical Society). This is a reprint of an unpublished volume originally written in 1946 by 2nd Lieutenant Edith C. Truslow, a member of the Women's Army Corps, as a contribution to the Manhattan Engineer District History.

13

Manhattan Project: Tech Area Gallery  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

TECH AREA GALLERY (LARGE) TECH AREA GALLERY (LARGE) Los Alamos: The Laboratory Resources > Photo Gallery All of the photographs below are of the "Tech Area" at Los Alamos during or shortly after the wartime years. If this page is taking a long time to load, click here for a photo gallery with smaller versions of the same images. There is a map of the Tech Area at the top and again at the bottom. The first image below is courtesy the Los Alamos National Laboratory. All of the other photographs are reproduced from Edith C. Truslow, with Kasha V. Thayer, ed., Manhattan Engineer District: Nonscientific Aspects of Los Alamos Project Y, 1942 through 1946 (Los Alamos, NM: Manhattan Engineer District, ca. 1946; first printed by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory as LA-5200, March 1973; reprinted in 1997 by the Los Alamos Historical Society). This is a reprint of an unpublished volume originally written in 1946 by 2nd Lieutenant Edith C. Truslow, a member of the Women's Army Corps, as a contribution to the Manhattan Engineer District History.

14

Manhattan Project: People  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

People People Administrators Scientists Civilian Organizations Military Organizations Non-Technical Personnel J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Ernest Lawrence People PLEASE NOTE: The People pages are not yet available. Links to the pages listed below and to the left will be activated as content is developed. Select people and organizations of the Manhattan Project have been grouped into the categories listed to the left. A quick overview of the groups of people contributing to the success of the Manhattan Project can be obtained by reading the summary pages for each of the categories, located in the left navigation bar. Each summary page also has a listing of all the people included in that category. For a complete menu of all people pages, see the comprehensive list of people below.

15

Manhattan Project: Processes  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Processes Processes Uranium Mining, Milling, and Refining Uranium Isotope Separation Plutonium Production Bomb Design, Development, and Production Bomb Testing and Weapon Effects Processes PLEASE NOTE: The Processes pages are not yet available. Links to the pages listed below and to the left will be activated as content is developed. Select topics relating to the industrial processes of the Manhattan Project have been grouped into the categories listed to the left. A quick overview of processes involved in the mission of the Manhattan Project can be obtained by reading the summary pages for each of the categories, located in the left navigation bar. Each summary page also has a listing of all the subtopics included within that category. For a complete menu of all process pages, see the comprehensive list of topics below.

16

Manhattan Project: Events  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Time Periods Time Periods 1890s-1939: Atomic Discoveries 1939-1942: Early Government Support 1942: Difficult Choices 1942-1944: The Uranium Path to the Bomb 1942-1944: The Plutonium Path to the Bomb 1942-1945: Bringing It All Together 1945: Dawn of the Atomic Era 1945-present: Postscript -- The Nuclear Age Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard Events The events of the Manhattan Project have been grouped under the time periods listed to the left. A quick overview of the Manhattan Project can be obtained by reading the summaries on each of the eight "Time Periods" pages, located in the left navigation bar. Each summary page also has a listing of the events pages for that particular time period. For a complete menu of all events pages, see the comprehensive list of events below.

17

Manhattan Project: Image Retouching`  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Image Retouching Image Retouching Resources > Photo Gallery Smyth Report (original) Smyth Report (retouched) Images on this web site have sometimes been "retouched." In every case, however, the intention has been only to restore the image as much as possible to its original condition. Above is a rather extreme example-"before and after" versions of the cover of the Smyth Report (Henry DeWolf Smyth, Atomic Energy for Military Purposes: The Official Report on the Development of the Atomic Bomb under the Auspices of the United States Government, 1940-1945 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1945)). The Smyth Report was commissioned by Leslie Groves and originally issued by the Manhattan Engineer District. Princeton University Press reprinted it in book form as a "public service" with "reproduction in whole or in part authorized and permitted.") Larger versions of the same images are below.

18

Manhattan Project: Site Map  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SITE MAP SITE MAP Resources > Site Map THE MANHATTAN PROJECT Events 1890s-1939: Atomic Discoveries A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 1939-1942: Early Government Support Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 1942: Difficult Choices More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 1942-1944: The Uranium Path to the Bomb Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943

19

Manhattan Project National Historical Park | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Manhattan Project National Historical Park Manhattan Project National Historical Park Manhattan Project National Historical Park The Department, as the direct descendent of the Manhattan Engineer District, owns and manages the Federal properties at most of the major Manhattan Project sites, including Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Hanford, Washington; and Los Alamos, New Mexico. For over a decade, the Department, in cooperation with other Federal agencies, state and local governments, and other stakeholders, has pursued the possibility of including its most significant Manhattan Project properties within a Manhattan Project National Historical Park. A panel of distinguished historic preservation experts convened in 2001 by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at the request of the Department of Energy recommended that the "ultimate goal" for

20

Manhattan Project: The Venona Intercepts  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Venona intercept regarding Theodore Hall THE VENONA INTERCEPTS (Washington, D.C., 1946-1980) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Soviet intelligence officers in the United States regularly communicated with their superiors in Moscow via telegraphic cables. These messages were encrypted of course, but in 1946 the United States, with the assistance of Great Britain, began to decrypt a good number of these messages. This program led to the eventual capture of several Soviet spies within the Manhattan Project. The VENONA intercepts, as they were codenamed, remained a closely-guarded secret, known only to a handful of government officials, until the program was declassified in 1995. Meredith Gardner (left) and some of his team of cryptanalysts.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Manhattan Project: Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Klaus Fuchs's Los Alamos security badge photo ESPIONAGE AND THE MANHATTAN PROJECT Klaus Fuchs's Los Alamos security badge photo ESPIONAGE AND THE MANHATTAN PROJECT (1940-1945) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 Security was a way of life for the Manhattan Project. The goal was to keep the entire atomic bomb program secret from Germany and Japan. In this, Manhattan Project security officials succeeded. They also sought, however, to keep word of the atomic bomb from reaching the Soviet Union. Although an ally of Britain and the United States in the war against Germany, the Soviet Union remained a repressive dictatorship and a potential future enemy. Here, security officials were less successful. Soviet spies penetrated the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos and several other locations, sending back to Russia critical information that helped speed the development of the Soviet bomb.

22

Manhattan Project: The Manhattan Project and the Second World War,  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Oak Ridgers celebrate V-J Day THE MANHATTAN PROJECT AND THE SECOND WORLD WAR Oak Ridgers celebrate V-J Day THE MANHATTAN PROJECT AND THE SECOND WORLD WAR (1939-1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the surrender of Japan were the last acts of the Second World War. The most destructive weapon in the history of combat had helped bring an end to the most destructive conflict in human history.

23

Manhattan Project Signature Facilities | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Manhattan Manhattan Project Signature Facilities Manhattan Project Signature Facilities Manhattan Project Signature Facilities The Department of Energy, in the mid-1990s, developed a list of eight Manhattan Project properties that were designated as "Signature Facilities." These properties, taken together, provided the essential core for successfully interpreting for the American public the Manhattan Project mission of developing an atomic bomb. The Department's goal was to move foward in preserving and interpreting these properties by integrating departmental headquarters and field activities and joining in a working partnership with all interested outside entities, organizations, and individuals, including Congress, state and local governments, the Department's contractors, and various other stakeholders.

24

President Roosevelt Establishes Manhattan Project | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Establishes Manhattan Project | National Nuclear Establishes Manhattan Project | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our History > NNSA Timeline > President Roosevelt Establishes Manhattan Project President Roosevelt Establishes Manhattan Project June 17, 1942 Washington, DC President Roosevelt Establishes Manhattan Project

25

The Manhattan Project -- Its Story  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Project -- Its Story Project -- Its Story Establishment · Operations · Immediate Influences · Long-term Influences · Other Info More About the Manhattan Project atom image Courtesy Argonne National Laboratory The Manhattan Project -- Its Background This year is the 70th anniversary of the establishment of the Manhattan Project, a predecessor of the U.S. Department of Energy. To honor its impacts on science and history, various aspects of its background, establishment, operations, and immediate and long-term influences will be revisited. It started during the fall of 1939, when President F. D. Roosevelt was made aware of the possibility that German scientists were racing to build an atomic bomb and was warned that Hitler would be more than willing to resort to such a weapon. As a result, Roosevelt set up the Advisory Committee on Uranium, consisting of both civilian and military representatives, to study the current state of research on uranium and to recommend an appropriate role for the federal government. The result was limited military funding for isotope separation and the work on chain reactions by Enrico Fermi and Leo Szilard at Columbia University.

26

Manhattan Project: A Note on Sources  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

A NOTE ON SOURCES A NOTE ON SOURCES Resources > Note on Sources The text for this web site is a combination of original material and adaptations from previous publications of the Department of Energy (including contractors), its predecessor agencies (primarily the Atomic Energy Commission and the Manhattan Engineer District), and other government agencies. Adaptations run the gamut from summaries to close paraphrases to text being taken directly. This material was gathered and adapted for use by the DOE's Office of History and Heritage Resources. For detailed notes on what sources were used for any particular page, see the footnote at the bottom of the page or its entry in Sources and Notes. For a discussion of the best general sources on the Manhattan Project, see the Suggested Readings.

27

Manhattan Project: Informing the Public, August 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The Smyth Report, August 1945. INFORMING THE PUBLIC The Smyth Report, August 1945. INFORMING THE PUBLIC (August 1945) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present The atomic bombing of Japan in early August 1945 suddenly thrust the Manhattan Project into the center of the public eye. What formerly had been privy to a select few now became the object of intense public curiosity and scrutiny. Manhattan Project officials, however, had no intent to release what they viewed as essential military secrets. To both allay inordinate inquisitiveness and satisfy the legitimate public need to know, officials in early 1944 began a carefully designed public relations program in anticipation of when they would have to announce the news to the world. They perceived that, from the standpoint of security, the release of some selected information would make it easier to maintain the secrecy of the highly classified aspects of the project. The public relations program had two parts: preparation of a series of public releases and preparation of an administrative and scientific history of the project.

28

Manhattan Project: Berkeley Meeting  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Resources Resources About this Site How to Navigate this Site Library Maps Note on Sources Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know Photo Gallery Site Map Sources and Notes Suggested Readings BERKELEY MEETING University of California, Berkeley (March 29, 1940) Resources > Photo Gallery Lawrence, A. Compton, Bush, Conant, K. Compton, and Loomis A meeting regarding the 184-inch cyclotron project, held at the University of California, Berkeley, on March 29, 1940. Left to right: Ernest O. Lawrence, Arthur H. Compton, Vannevar Bush, James B. Conant, Karl T. Compton, and Alfred L. Loomis. The photograph is reprinted in Richard G. Hewlett and Oscar E. Anderson, Jr., The New World, 1939-1946: Volume I, A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission (Washington: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1972), opposite page 33.

29

Manhattan Project: Potsdam Note  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

POTSDAM NOTE POTSDAM NOTE Potsdam, Germany (July 1945) Resources > Photo Gallery Note written by President Harry S. Truman, in which he brags that Stalin did not understand when Truman hinted at Potsdam of a powerful new American weapon. (Scroll down to see the note.) Due to the success of Soviet espionage, however, Truman was incorrect-in fact, Stalin knew about the atomic bomb project three years before Truman did. Truman wrote this note on the back of a photograph of the Potsdam Conference taken on July 19, 1945. In the photograph Stalin talks with Truman and Secretary of State James Byrnes (both have their backs to the camera). The photograph of Potsdam is courtesy the Office of the Chief Signal Officer, War Department, U.S. Army; this image, and the photograph of Truman's writing on the back of it, are courtesy the National Archives.

30

The Manhattan Project National Security History Series  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

The Manhattan Project National Security History Series 5 Visit our Manhattan Project web site: http://www.cfo.doe.gov/me70/manhattan/index.htm 5 DOE/MA-0002 Revised F. G. Gosling Office of History and Heritage Resources Executive Secretariat Office of Management Department of Energy January 2010 The Manhattan Project National Security History Series 5 National Security History Series Volume I: The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb Volume II: Building the Nuclear Arsenal: Cold War Nuclear Weapons Development and Production, 1946-1989 (in progress) Volume III: Nonproliferation and Stockpile Stewardship: The Nuclear Weapons Complex in the Post-Cold War World (projected) The National Security History Series is a joint project of the Office

31

Manufacturing Fuel Cell Manhattan Project  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

to to DOE Fuel Cell Manufacturing Workshop 2011 John Christensen, PE NREL Consultant DOE Fuel Cell Market Transformation Support August 11, 2011 Manufacturing Fuel Cell Manhattan Project √ Identify manufacturing cost drivers to achieve affordability √ Identify best practices in fuel cell manufacturing technology √ Identify manufacturing technology gaps √ Identify FC projects to address these gaps MFCMP Objectives Completed Final Report due out Nov 2010 B2PCOE Montana Tech SME's Industry Academia Government FC Consortiums Power ranges * <0.5 kW (man portable / man wearable) * 0.5 kW< Power range < 10 kW (mobile power) Fuels: Hydrogen and reformed hydrocarbons *Packaged Fuels < 0.5 kW * Near term solution * Move through the supply chain like batteries

32

Manhattan Project: Solvay Physics Conference  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SOLVAY PHYSICS CONFERENCE SOLVAY PHYSICS CONFERENCE Brussels, Belgium (October 1933) Resources > Photo Gallery Solvay Physics Conference, Brussels, 1933 The Solvay Physics Conference, held in Brussels, Belgium, October 22-29, 1933. Attendees included two future key Manhattan Project scientists (Fermi and Lawrence), the future head of the Nazi atomic bomb program (Heisenberg), and numerous leading pre-war physicists. A partial list of those attending: Niels Bohr (seated, third from left) James Chadwick (seated, farthest right) J. B. Cockroft (middle row, third from right) Marie Curie (seated, fifth from left) Enrico Fermi (middle row, fifth from left) Werner Heisenberg (middle row, fourth from left) Ernest O. Lawrence (back row, second from right) Lise Meitner (seated, second from right)

33

Manhattan Project: Sources and Notes  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SOURCES AND NOTES SOURCES AND NOTES Resources > Sources Below are the collected specific notes for the text and images used on the pages of this web site. For a discussion of the most important works on the Manhattan Project, see the "Suggested Readings." For a general discussion of the use of sources in this web site, see "A Note on Sources." To scan the sources and notes for various categories, choose from the list below. To view the sources and notes for a specific web page, see the footnote at the bottom of each page (exceptions include this page and the home page; the sources and notes for the home page are the first ones listed below). Home Events 1890s-1939: Atomic Discoveries 1939-1942: Early Government Support 1942: Difficult Choices

34

Manhattan Project: Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-Present  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Joseph Stalin, Yalta, Russia, February 9, 1945 FIRST STEPS TOWARD INTERNATIONAL CONTROL Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Joseph Stalin, Yalta, Russia, February 9, 1945 FIRST STEPS TOWARD INTERNATIONAL CONTROL (1941-July 1945) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Throughout most of the Second World War, officials gave little consideration to the postwar atom. Even at the top echelons of government, few knew of the Manhattan Project, and among those who did the primary concern was the ultimate success of the bomb development and not possible impact of the bomb on postwar international relations. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Vannevar Bush, director of the Office of Science and Research and Development and perhaps the President’s closest adviser on the bomb, discussed "after-war control" on October 9, 1941, "at some length" but there was no follow-up.

35

Manhattan Project: Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-Present  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Joe 1, the first Soviet atomic test, August 29, 1949. NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION Joe 1, the first Soviet atomic test, August 29, 1949. NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION (1949-Present) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Even before the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, many of the scientists of the Manhattan Project were arguing that international control of atomic energy was essential. Any modern, industrialized state, they reasoned, could eventually build its own atomic bomb if it so chose. There was no "secret" scientific theory or principle concerning the bomb. Its possibility was fundamental to modern physics. Then as now, the primary difficulties were engineering related: separating uranium-235 or producing plutonium and designing and building the actual weapon.

36

Manhattan Project: Groves and the MED, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Colonel James Marshall, 1946 GROVES AND THE MED Colonel James Marshall, 1946 GROVES AND THE MED (1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 The summer of 1942 proved to be a troublesome one for the fledgling bomb project. Colonel James C. Marshall (right) received the assignment of directing the Laboratory for the Development of Substitute Metals, or DSM, the military's initial cover name for the project. Marshall immediately moved from Syracuse, where he served in the Corps's Syracuse Engineer District, to New York City. Concerned that the name DSM would attract too much attention, the military set up the Manhattan Engineer District (MED), established by general order on August 13. Marshall, like most other Army officers, knew nothing of nuclear physics. Furthermore, Marshall and his Army superiors were disposed to move cautiously. In one case, for instance, Marshall delayed purchase of an excellent production site in Tennessee pending further study, while the scientists who had been involved in the project from the start were pressing for immediate purchase. Although Vannevar Bush had carefully managed the transition to Army control, there was not yet a mechanism to arbitrate disagreements between the S-1 Committee and the military. The resulting lack of coordination complicated attempts to gain a higher priority for scarce materials and boded ill for the future of the entire bomb project.

37

Manhattan Project: The "Big House"  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

THE "BIG HOUSE" THE "BIG HOUSE" Los Alamos Boys Ranch School and Los Alamos (The Town) Resources > Photo Gallery The "Big House," Los Alamos. The "Big House" was the dormitory for the Los Alamos Boys Ranch School. Students slept year-round on its unheated porches. During the Manhattan Project, the Big House contained, among other things, a library, the Chaplain's Office, and the Red Cross headquarters. Privileged guests and high-ranking civilians also sometimes stayed there. The photograph above is reproduced from Edith C. Truslow, with Kasha V. Thayer, ed., Manhattan Engineer District: Nonscientific Aspects of Los Alamos Project Y, 1942 through 1946 (Los Alamos, NM: Manhattan Engineer District, ca. 1946; first printed by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory as LA-5200, March 1973; reprinted in 1997 by the Los Alamos Historical Society), 58. The photograph below is of a group of Ranch School students in front of the Big House; it is reproduced from "Dateline: Los Alamos," a special issue of the monthly publication of Los Alamos National Laboratory (1995), 7. At the bottom is an "establishing shot" of Los Alamos in which Fuller Lodge and the Big House are visible in the distance to the left and the right, respectively; click here for more information on this photograph.

38

Work of Manhattan Project-era photographer Ed Westcott lives...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Work of Manhattan ... Work of Manhattan Project-era photographer Ed Westcott lives on Posted: June 13, 2012 - 1:30pm Ed Westcott mans the shutter release for another historic...

39

Manhattan Project: Kasparov, Kamen, and Kheifits  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

KASPAROV, KAMEN, AND KHEIFITS KASPAROV, KAMEN, AND KHEIFITS California? (n.d.) Resources > Photo Gallery Kasparov, Kamen, and Kheifits This surveillance photograph was taken by Manhattan Project security officials. On the right is Gregory Kheifits (KHARON), the NKGB Resident in San Francisco from 1941 to July 1944. On the left is his successor, Gregory Kasparov (DAR). In between them is Martin Kamen, a chemist at the University of California, Berkeley's "Rad Lab." (Kamen was later dismissed as a "security risk.") The photo is courtesy the National Security Agency. For more on Kheifits and Kasparov, see "The Venona Story." See also "The Venona Intercepts, 1946-1980." See also the group photograph of the staff at the Rad Lab in 1939, which includes Kamen, Ernest O. Lawrence, Robert Oppenheimer, and numerous other Manhattan Project scientists. Lawrence is bottom row center; Kamen is over Lawrence's left shoulder; and Oppenheimer is over Kamen's right shoulder.

40

The Manhattan Project: An Interactive History  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer In a national survey at the turn of the millennium, both journalists and the public ranked the dropping of the atomic bomb and the end of the Second World War as the top news stories of the twentieth-century. The advent of nuclear weapons, made possible by the Manhattan Project, not only helped bring an end to the Second World War-it ushered in the atomic age and determined how the next war, the Cold War, would be fought. The Manhattan Project: An Interactive History is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of the Manhattan Project. Five main topical areas-Events, People, Places, Processes, and Science-are further divided into sub-sections, each with an introductory page and as many as a dozen or more sub-pages. The site is interactive in the sense that it is designed with the flexibility to meet the needs of a variety of users. Those seeking a brief overview of the Manhattan Project, for example, should start with the introductory pages for the eight sub-sections of the Events Section. Users wanting a more in-depth chronological history should read, in order, the fifty-six Events sub-pages. Numerous internal links within the content of the pages allows the reader to easily move from page to page, wherever his or her interests lead. There are thus multiple ways for the user to approach the site. In addition, the Resources Section provides access to a variety of resource materials, including photos, documents, maps, and published histories.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Manhattan Project: About the Site  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

ABOUT THIS SITE ABOUT THIS SITE Resources Project Directors: Terrence R. Fehner, Chief Historian F. G. Gosling, former Chief Historian (retired) Assisted By: David Rezelman, Glenn T. Seaborg Fellow in Nuclear History Stephanie Young, Edward Teller Fellow in Science and National Security Studies Andrew Mamo, Edward Teller Fellow in Science and National Security Studies Emily Hamilton, Edward Teller Fellow in Science and National Security Studies Douglas O’Reagan, Edward Teller Fellow in Science and National Security Studies James Skee, Edward Teller Fellow in Science and National Security Studies Site Designer: Jennifer Johnson, Archivist Summary Words (estimate): 120,000 Total Pages if Printed (estimate): 430 Total Images: 500+ Photographs: 450+ Maps and Diagrams: 64 Total Images (counting varying sizes, etc.): 1,000+

42

Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb F.G. Gosling. The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb. DOE/MA-0002 Revised. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy, 2010. 115 pp., with 38 pp. photo gallery). From the Forward to the 2010 Edition: "In a national survey at the turn of the millennium, journalists and historians ranked the dropping of the atomic bomb and the surrender of Japan to end the Second World War as the top story of the twentieth century. The advent of nuclear weapons, brought about by the Manhattan Project, not only helped bring an end to World War II but ushered in the atomic age and determined how the next war-the Cold War-would be fought. The Manhattan Project also became the organizational model behind

43

Manhattan Project: F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

F REACTOR PLUTONIUM PRODUCTION COMPLEX F REACTOR PLUTONIUM PRODUCTION COMPLEX Hanford Engineer Works, 1945 Resources > Photo Gallery Plutonium production area, Hanford, ca. 1945 The F Reactor plutonium production complex at Hanford. The "boxy" building between the two water towers on the right is the plutonium production reactor; the long building in the center of the photograph is the water treatment plant. The photograph was reproduced from Henry DeWolf Smyth, Atomic Energy for Military Purposes: The Official Report on the Development of the Atomic Bomb under the Auspices of the United States Government, 1940-1945 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1945). The Smyth Report was commissioned by Leslie Groves and originally issued by the Manhattan Engineer District. Princeton University Press reprinted it in book form as a "public service" with "reproduction in whole or in part authorized and permitted."

44

Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup A Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) excavation crew working on an American Recovery and Reinvestment Act cleanup project has uncovered the remnants of a 1940s military truck buried in a Manhattan Project landfill. The truck was unearthed inside a sealed building where digging is taking place at Material Disposal Area B (MDA-B), the Lab's first hazardous and radioactive waste landfill. MDA-B was used from 1944 to 1948. Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup More Documents & Publications Los Alamos Lab Completes Excavation of Waste Disposal Site Used in the 1940s Protecting Recovery Act Cleanup Site During Massive Wildfire

45

Manhattan Project Resources | Y-12 National Security Complex  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Manhattan Project Resources Manhattan Project Resources Manhattan Project Resources Building 9731 was the first building completed at Y-12 and was the "Pilot Plant" for the Calutron electromagnetic separation of uranium. The Manhattan Project web pages are designed to disseminate information and documentation on the Manhattan Project to a broad audience including scholars, students, and the general public. These web pages are a joint collaboration between DOE's Office of Classification and Office of History and Heritage Resources. The Y-12 History Center is proud to recommend them highly as they contain very helpful information. The site brings together an enormous amount of material, much of it never before released. An example of the key resource information provided is the update and

46

Manhattan Project: How to Navigate this Site  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS SITE HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS SITE Resources > Navigation There are five main topical areas on this web site: Events, People, Places, Processes, and Science. These are further divided into sub-sections, each with its own introduction. The main topical areas can be accessed by clicking on a button on the horizontal bar above. Sub-sections can be accessed by clicking on a topic in the vertical column to your left. If you would like to begin with a quick survey of the Manhattan Project, try reading, in order, the eight Event sub-section pages, beginning with Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939. In addition to the main topical areas, the Resources section on the above button bar provides access to a variety of resource materials, including photos, documents, maps, and published histories.

47

Manhattan Project: Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-Present  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Bernard Baruch presents the United States plan for international control of atomic energy to the United Nations, June 14, 1946. NEGOTIATING INTERNATIONAL CONTROL Bernard Baruch presents the United States plan for international control of atomic energy to the United Nations, June 14, 1946. NEGOTIATING INTERNATIONAL CONTROL (December 1945-1946) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present After American, British, and Canadian officials agreed at the November 1945 Washington meeting to a negotiating approach on international control, Secretary of State James F. Byrnes quickly arranged for the Big Three foreign ministers to meet in Moscow in mid-December. Atomic energy, which the Soviets placed last on a long list of agenda items, was discussed only in terms of the United Nations proposal. Surprising Byrnes with their willingness to cooperate, the Soviets acquiesced to the American proposal, which was based on the Washington joint declaration, but with one exception. They agreed that the commission should be set up by the United Nations General Assembly, but, counter to the American plan, they insisted that the commission report to the Security Council and be accountable to it "in matters affecting security." This was no mere procedural difference. Most of the members in the General Assembly, where decisions were made by majority rule, were more closely aligned to the United States than to the Soviet Union. In the Security Council, the Soviet Union possessed the veto and could effectively halt any commission actions that it found objectionable.

48

Manhattan Project: Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-Present  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson and Secretary of State James F. Byrnes arrive at the Gatow Airport in Berlin for the Potsdam Conference, July 15, 1945. SEARCH FOR A POLICY ON INTERNATIONAL CONTROL Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson and Secretary of State James F. Byrnes arrive at the Gatow Airport in Berlin for the Potsdam Conference, July 15, 1945. SEARCH FOR A POLICY ON INTERNATIONAL CONTROL (August to November 1945) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present In the immediate aftermath of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, President Harry S. Truman and his top officials viewed the Soviet Union as the primary stumbling block in the move toward international control of the atomic bomb. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson and Secretary of State James F. Byrnes represented the two poles of an uncertain and divided policy. Despite his ongoing misgivings concerning the Soviets, Stimson determined that unless the United States offered full partnership in the development of atomic energy the Soviet Union would begin "a secret armament race of a rather desperate character." Byrnes, on the eve of the first postwar foreign ministers conference to be held in London, remained adamant in opposition to any attempt to cooperate with the Soviets on atomic energy and viewed the bomb as a diplomatic asset that would make the Soviets more amenable. As Stimson observed in his diary, Byrnes went to London fully set on having "the implied threat of the bomb in his pocket during the conference."

49

EA-1903: Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, Manhattan,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3: Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, 3: Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, Manhattan, Kansas EA-1903: Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, Manhattan, Kansas SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to use Congressional Directed funds to develop the Great Plains Wind Energy Consortium aimed at increasing the penetration of wind energy via distributed wind power generation throughout the region. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD October 21, 2013 EA-1903: Notice of Extension Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, Manhattan, Kansas September 11, 2013 EA-1903: Draft Environmental Assessment Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, Manhattan, Kansas September 11, 2013

50

New Manhattan Project Resource Page Launched | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Manhattan Project Resource Page Launched Manhattan Project Resource Page Launched New Manhattan Project Resource Page Launched July 16, 2013 - 5:48pm Addthis General Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer are pictured here at the Trinity Test site in New Mexico, 1945. General Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer are pictured here at the Trinity Test site in New Mexico, 1945. Terry Fehner Terry Fehner Historian, Federal Preservation Officer Andy Weston-Dawkes Director of the Office of Classification What are the key facts? From Trinity to today -- learn about the Department's direct connection with the Manhattan Project here. Sixty-eight years ago today, on an isolated corner of the Alamogordo Bombing Range in southern New Mexico, the atomic age began. At precisely 5:30 a.m., a device fueled with about 13½ pounds of plutonium, in a weapon

51

MANHATTAN PROJECT NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

PARK MANHATTAN PROJECT NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK Shift change at the Y-12 facility in Oak Ridge, TN, where uranium-235 was separated from uranium-238. August 1945. Shift change...

52

Manhattan Project: Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer EVALUATIONS OF TRINITY Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer EVALUATIONS OF TRINITY (July 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Only minutes after the world's first ever atomic explosion, Leslie Groves and Robert Oppenheimer (above) began composing their report for the Secretary of War and President Truman. There was a sense of urgency surrounding this notification, as Truman had already arrived at Potsdam (outside of Berlin) to confer with other Allied leaders on the conclusion of the war with Japan. Now that the potential of the bomb had been proven, the calculations behind the Potsdam negotiations were dramatically different.

53

Historic Manhattan Project Sites at Los Alamos  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

The Manhattan Project laboratory constructed at Los Alamos, New Mexico, beginning in 1943, was intended from the start to be temporary and to go up with amazing speed. Because most of those WWII-era facilities were built with minimal materials and so quickly, much of the original infrastructure was torn down in the late '40s and early '50s and replaced by more permanent facilities. However, a few key facilities remained, and are being preserved and maintained for historic significance. Four such sites are visited briefly in this video, taking viewers to V-Site, the buildings where the first nuclear explosive device was pre-assembled in preparation for the Trinity Test in Southern New Mexico. Included is another WWII area, Gun Site. So named because it was the area where scientists and engineers tested the so-called "gun method" of assembling nuclear materials -- the fundamental design of the Little Boy weapon that was eventually dropped on Hiroshima. The video also goes to Pajarito Site, home of the "Slotin Building" and "Pond Cabin." The Slotin Building is the place where scientist Louis Slotin conducted a criticality experiment that went awry in early 1946, leading to his unfortunate death, and the Pond Cabin served the team of eminent scientist Emilio Segre who did early chemistry work on plutonium that ultimately led to the Fat Man weapon.

McGehee, Ellen

2014-05-22T23:59:59.000Z

54

Recovery Act milestone: Excavation begins at Manhattan Project landfill  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Recovery Act milestone Recovery Act milestone Recovery Act milestone: Excavation begins at Manhattan Project landfill The six-acre site contains a series of trenches used from 1944 to 1948 to dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous trash from Manhattan Project labs and buildings. July 1, 2010 Los Alamos National Laboratory sits on top of a once-remote mesa in northern New Mexico with the Jemez mountains as a backdrop to research and innovation covering multi-disciplines from bioscience, sustainable energy sources, to plasma physics and new materials. Los Alamos National Laboratory sits on top of a once-remote mesa in northern New Mexico with the Jemez mountains as a backdrop to research and innovation covering multi-disciplines from bioscience, sustainable energy sources, to plasma physics and new materials.

55

Manhattan Project: Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The Smyth Report, August 1945. NUCLEAR ENERGY AND THE The Smyth Report, August 1945. NUCLEAR ENERGY AND THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO KNOW Resources > Openness Given ongoing concerns with terrorism and nuclear proliferation, a word about secrecy, the information presented on this web site, and the public's right to know is in order. The information on this web site is currently available, and has long been available, in any major university library. The basic story of the Manhattan Project was first released to the public in August 1945 in the "Smyth Report" (right), a book-length study of the Manhattan Project. It was personally reviewed by Leslie Groves, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest O. Lawrence, and others, to ensure that it contained no information that would be of assistance to anyone who might try to build a nuclear weapon. The information from the Smyth Report and other contemporary MED press releases has been supplemented in subsequent years by numerous other histories of the Manhattan Project, including a comprehensive official history produced by the Atomic Energy Henry D. Smyth confers with Ernest O. Lawrence about the Smyth Report, Berkeley, fall 1944. Commission (AEC) historians Richard G. Hewlett and Oscar E. Anderson, Jr. As for the most potentially-sensitive category of entries on this web site, "Science," most of the text for these entries was taken directly from an unclassified 1963 AEC publication, The Atomic Energy Deskbook. Created under the personal supervision of AEC Chairman Glenn T. Seaborg, the Deskbook was intended from the start to be a reference work for the public. The intent of all of these publications was to reveal what could be revealed and to keep secret what needed to be kept secret. Accordingly, this web site has been reviewed by the Department of Energy's Office of Classification and confirmed to be unclassified. (For more information on Manhattan Project-related publications, see the list of "Suggested Readings.")

56

Manhattan Project: Postscript--The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Government-suggested fallout shelter design, 1950s POSTSCRIPT--THE NUCLEAR AGE Government-suggested fallout shelter design, 1950s POSTSCRIPT--THE NUCLEAR AGE (1945-Present) Events Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Joe 1, the first Soviet atomic test, August 29, 1949. The end of the Second World War brought with it a whole new set of issues and problems, not least of which was the dilemma of what to do with the nuclear genie now that he had been let out of the bottle. In the United States, and around the world, news of the atomic bomb created among the public a sense of shock and awe. Manhattan Engineer District officials took certain obvious steps such as slowing down the program from its wartime pace, but the assembly of additional nuclear weapons did quietly continue.

57

Manhattan Project: Picking Horses, November 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

General Leslie Groves PICKING HORSES General Leslie Groves PICKING HORSES (November 1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 Leslie Groves (right) moved swiftly to make good on his new timetable by scheduling a decisive meeting of the Military Policy Committee for November 12, 1942, and of the S-1 Executive Committee for November 14. The scientists at each of the institutions doing isotope separation research knew these meetings would determine the uranium-235 separation method to be used in the bomb project; therefore, the keen competition among the institutions added to the sense of urgency created by the war. Ernest Lawrence's team working on the electromagnetic method at the University of California, Berkeley, remained the most optimistic team working on uranium enrichment. The gaseous diffusion research being conducted at Columbia University continued to meet serious difficulties, but it was still considered a viable option. The big loser of the November meetings was the centrifuge process, which was finally dropped from consideration.

58

Manhattan Project: The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

American troops approaching the beach, D-Day, June 6, 1944. THE WAR ENTERS ITS FINAL PHASE American troops approaching the beach, D-Day, June 6, 1944. THE WAR ENTERS ITS FINAL PHASE (1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Harry Truman being sworn in as president, April 12, 1945. On April 12, 1945, only weeks before Germany's unconditional surrender on May 7, President Franklin Roosevelt died suddenly in Warm Springs, Georgia. Vice President Harry S. Truman, a veteran of the United States Senate, was now president. Truman had not been privy to many of Roosevelt's internal policy deliberations and had to be briefed extensively in his first weeks in office. One of these briefings, provided by Secretary of War Henry Stimson on April 25, concerned S-1 (the Manhattan Project). Stimson, with Leslie Groves present during part of the meeting, traced the history of the Manhattan Project, summarized its status, and detailed the timetable for testing and combat delivery. Truman asked numerous questions during the forty-five minute meeting and made it clear that he understood the relevance of the atomic bomb to upcoming diplomatic and military initiatives.

59

Manhattan Project: Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Trinity test radiation safety team SAFETY AND THE TRINITY TEST Trinity test radiation safety team SAFETY AND THE TRINITY TEST (Trinity Test Site, July 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Bunker at S-10,000 The "Trinity" atomic test was the most violent man-made explosion in history to that date. It also posed the single most significant safety hazard of the entire Manhattan Project. Understanding this, test planners chose a flat, desert scrub region in the northwest corner of the isolated Alamogordo Bombing Range in south central New Mexico for the test. This location, 210 miles south of Los Alamos, was only twenty miles from the nearest offsite habitation. If the explosion was considerably larger than predicted, the dangers could be extreme to the test personnel and surrounding areas.

60

Manhattan Project: Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Trinity, July 16, 1945 DAWN OF THE ATOMIC ERA (1945) Events The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 As the war entered its final phase, the Manhattan Project became an increasingly important and controversial element in American strategy. Debate over how to use the bomb began in earnest in early summer of 1945. The Trinity atomic test of July 16 (right) confirmed that the stakes for this decision were very high. With a blast equivalent of approximately 21 kilotons of TNT, the test explosion was greater than had been predicted, and the dispersal of radioactive fallout following the test made safety something of a near thing. News of the success at Trinity reached President Harry S. Truman at the Potsdam Conference.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Manhattan Project: Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Entrance to the Los Alamos "Tech Area" ESTABLISHING LOS ALAMOS Entrance to the Los Alamos "Tech Area" ESTABLISHING LOS ALAMOS (Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1942-1943) Events > Bringing it All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 Map of Los Alamos, New Mexico. The final link in the Manhattan Project's far-flung network was the bomb research and development laboratory at Los Alamos, located in the mountains of northern New Mexico. Codenamed "Project Y," the laboratory that designed and fabricated the first atomic bombs began to take shape in spring 1942 when James Conant suggested to Vannevar Bush that the Office of Scientific and Research Development and the Army form a committee to study bomb development. Bush agreed and forwarded the recommendation to Vice President Henry Wallace, Secretary of War Henry Stimson, and General George Marshall (the Top Policy Group). By the time of his appointment in late September, Leslie Groves had orders to set up a committee to study military applications of the bomb. Meanwhile, sentiment was growing among the Manhattan Project scientists that research on the bomb project needed to be better coordinated. Robert Oppenheimer, among others, advocated a central facility where theoretical and experimental work could be conducted according to standard scientific protocols. This would insure accuracy and speed progress. Oppenheimer suggested that the bomb design laboratory operate secretly in an isolated area but allow free exchange of ideas among the scientists on the staff. Groves accepted Oppenheimer's suggestion and began seeking an appropriate location. By the end of the year, they had settled on an unlikely site for the laboratory: an isolated boys' school on a mesa high in the Jemez Mountains (map at left).

62

Manhattan Project: Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Ernest Lawrence, Arthur Compton, Vannevar Bush, James Conant, Karl Compton, and Alfred Loomis, Berkeley, 1940 DEBATE OVER HOW TO USE THE BOMB Ernest Lawrence, Arthur Compton, Vannevar Bush, James Conant, Karl Compton, and Alfred Loomis, Berkeley, 1940 DEBATE OVER HOW TO USE THE BOMB (Washington, D.C., Late Spring 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Ernest Lawrence In early May 1945, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, with the approval of President Harry S. Truman, formed an Interim Committee of top officials charged with recommending the proper use of atomic weapons in wartime and developing a position for the United States on postwar atomic policy. Stimson headed the advisory group composed of Vannevar Bush, James Conant, Karl T. Compton, Under Secretary of the Navy Ralph A. Bard, Assistant Secretary of State William L. Clayton, and future Secretary of State James F. Byrnes. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, Arthur Compton, and Ernest Lawrence served as scientific advisors (the Scientific Panel), while General George Marshall represented the military. The committee met on May 31 and then again the next day with leaders from the business side of the Manhattan Project, including Walter S. Carpenter of DuPont, James C. White of Tennessee Eastman, George H. Bucher of Westinghouse, and James A. Rafferty of Union Carbide.

63

Manhattan Project: Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Norris Bradbury, Robert Oppenheimer, Richard Feynman, Enrico Fermi, and others, Los Alamos, 1946 BASIC RESEARCH AT LOS ALAMOS Norris Bradbury, Robert Oppenheimer, Richard Feynman, Enrico Fermi, and others, Los Alamos, 1946 BASIC RESEARCH AT LOS ALAMOS (Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1943-1944) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 Enrico Fermi The first few months at Los Alamos were occupied with briefings on nuclear physics for the technical staff and with planning research priorities and organizing the laboratory. Leslie Groves called once again on Warren Lewis to head a committee, this time to evaluate the Los Alamos program. The committee's recommendations resulted in the coordinated effort envisioned by those who advocated a unified laboratory for bomb research. Enrico Fermi (left) took control of critical mass experiments and standardization of measurement Hans Bethe techniques. Plutonium purification work, begun at the Met Lab, became high priority at Los Alamos, and increased attention was paid to metallurgy. The committee also recommended that an engineering division be organized to collaborate with physicists on bomb design and fabrication. The laboratory was thus organized into four divisions: theoretical (Hans A. Bethe, right); experimental physics (Robert F. Bacher); chemistry and metallurgy (Joseph W. Kennedy); and ordnance (Navy Captain William S. "Deke" Parsons). Like other Manhattan Project installations, Los Alamos soon began to expand beyond initial expectations.

64

Manhattan Project: Operation Crossroads, Bikini Atoll, July 1946  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Crossroads Baker, Bikini Atoll, July 25, 1946 OPERATION CROSSROADS Crossroads Baker, Bikini Atoll, July 25, 1946 OPERATION CROSSROADS (Bikini Atoll, July 1946) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Even after the Trinity test and the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, military officials still knew far less than they would have liked about the effects, especially on naval targets, of nuclear weapons. Accordingly, the Joint Chiefs of Staff requested and received presidential approval to conduct a series of tests during summer 1946. Vice Admiral W. H. P. Blandy, head of the test series task force, proposed calling the series Operation "Crossroads." "It was apparent," he noted, "that warfare, perhaps civilization itself, had been brought to a turning point by this revolutionary weapon."

65

Economic Development Project Districts (Indiana)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Redevelopment commissions may petition legislative bodies to designate economic development project districts in cities with populations between 80,500 and 500,000. Such districts may be...

66

Manhattan Project: The Cold War, 1945-1990  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

West Berliner talks to the East, Berlin Wall, November 1962 THE COLD WAR West Berliner talks to the East, Berlin Wall, November 1962 THE COLD WAR (1945-1990) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Joseph Stalin (with Vyacheslav Molotov), February 1945 The postwar organization of atomic energy took place against the backdrop of growing tension with the Soviet Union. Relations between the United States and the Soviet Union had been strained ever since the revolution of 1917 had first brought communists to power in Russia. This mutual distrust further deepened following the Soviet "non-aggression" treaty with Nazi Germany in August 1939 and the Soviet Union's subsequent invasions of Poland, Finland, and the Baltic Republics. Although Britain was allied with the Soviet Union following Germany's June 1941 invasion of Russia, as was the United States in the aftermath of Pearl Harbor, mutual suspicion lingered throughout the Second World War. The failure of the United States and Britain to tell the Soviet Union about the atomic bomb in anything other than the most vague terms only heightened the extreme suspicions of the Soviet dictator, Joseph Stalin (right). Not only did the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki help end the Second World War, but they also played a role in setting the stage for the half-century of conflict with the Soviet Union that followed it -- the Cold War.

67

Special Resource Study/Environmental Assessment for Manhattan Project Sites, DOE/EA-1868 (September 2010)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The purpose of this study is to comply with the Manhattan Project National Historical Park Study Act (Public Law 108-340), passed in 2004, which directed the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a...

68

Manhattan Project: The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Diffusion columns, S-50 Thermal Diffusion Plant, Oak Ridge, 1945. THE NAVY AND THERMAL DIFFUSION Diffusion columns, S-50 Thermal Diffusion Plant, Oak Ridge, 1945. THE NAVY AND THERMAL DIFFUSION (Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1944) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 As problems with both Y-12 and K-25 reached crisis proportions in spring and summer 1944, the Manhattan Project received help from an unexpected source: the United States Navy. President Roosevelt had instructed that the atomic bomb effort be an Army program and that the Navy be excluded from deliberations. Navy research on atomic power, conducted primarily for submarines, received no direct aid from Leslie Groves, who, in fact, was not up-to-date on the state of Navy efforts when he received a letter on the subject from Robert Oppenheimer late in April 1944.

69

Manhattan Project: The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 THE ATOMIC BOMBING OF NAGASAKI Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 THE ATOMIC BOMBING OF NAGASAKI (Nagasaki, Japan, August 9, 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 The next break in the weather over Japan was due to appear just three days after the attack on Hiroshima, to be followed by at least five more days of prohibitive weather. The plutonium implosion bomb, nicknamed "Fat Man," was rushed into readiness to take advantage of this window. No further orders were required for the attack. Truman's order of July 25th had authorized the dropping of additional bombs as soon as they were ready. At 3:47 a.m. on August 9, 1945, a B-29 named Bock's Car lifted off from Tinian and headed toward the primary target: Kokura Arsenal, a massive collection of war industries adjacent to the city of Kokura.

70

Manhattan Project: Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Japanese envoys arrive on board the U.S.S. Missouri for the surrender ceremony, Tokyo Bay, September 2, 1945. JAPAN SURRENDERS Japanese envoys arrive on board the U.S.S. Missouri for the surrender ceremony, Tokyo Bay, September 2, 1945. JAPAN SURRENDERS (August 10-15, 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Prior to the atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, elements existed within the Japanese government that were trying to find a way to end the war. In June and July 1945, Japan attempted to enlist the help of the Soviet Union to serve as an intermediary in negotiations. No direct communication occurred with the United States about peace talks, but American leaders knew of these maneuvers because the United States for a long time had been intercepting and decoding many internal Japanese diplomatic communications. From these intercepts, the United States learned that some within the Japanese government advocated outright surrender. A few diplomats overseas cabled home to urge just that.

71

Manhattan Project: The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 THE ATOMIC BOMBING OF HIROSHIMA Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 THE ATOMIC BOMBING OF HIROSHIMA (Hiroshima, Japan, August 6, 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 In the early morning hours of August 6, 1945, a B-29 bomber named Enola Gay took off from the island of Tinian and headed north by northwest toward Japan. The bomber's primary target was the city of Hiroshima, located on the deltas of southwestern Honshu Island facing the Inland Sea. Hiroshima had a civilian population of almost 300,000 and was an important military center, containing about 43,000 soldiers.

72

Manhattan Project: Implosion Becomes a Necessity, Los Alamos, 1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Implosion IMPLOSION BECOMES A NECESSITY Implosion IMPLOSION BECOMES A NECESSITY (Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1944) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 An early implosion experiment, Los Alamos, 1944 Because the gun-type bomb design seemed so simple and practical, Deke Parsons had assigned implosion studies a low priority and placed the emphasis on the more familiar artillery method. Consequently, Seth H. Neddermeyer performed his early implosion tests in relative obscurity. Neddermeyer found it difficult to achieve symmetrical implosions at the low velocities he had achieved. When the Princeton mathematician John von Neumann, a Hungarian refugee, visited Los Alamos late in 1943, he suggested that high-speed assembly and high velocities would prevent predetonation and achieve more symmetrical explosions. A relatively small, subcritical mass could be placed under so much pressure by a symmetrical implosion that an efficient detonation would occur. Less fissionable material would be required, bombs could be ready earlier, and extreme purification of plutonium would be unnecessary. Von Neumann's theories excited Robert Oppenheimer, who assigned Parsons's deputy, George B. Kistiakowsky, the task of perfecting implosion techniques. (Kistiakowsky would later become President Dwight D. Eisenhower's science adviser.) Because Parsons and Neddermeyer did not get along, it was Kistiakowsky who worked with the scientists on the implosion project.

73

Manhattan Project: Bringing it All Together, 1942-1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Eric Jette, Charles Critchfield, and J. Robert Oppenheimer, Los Alamos BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER Eric Jette, Charles Critchfield, and J. Robert Oppenheimer, Los Alamos BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER (1942-1945) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 No matter how much enriched uranium and plutonium might be produced at Oak Ridge and Hanford, it would all come to nothing if workable weapon designs could not be developed in time. To this end, in late 1942 Leslie Groves established a bomb research and development laboratory at Los Alamos in the remote mountains of northern New Mexico. The early work at Los Alamos concentrated primarily on defining the problems that needed to be solved. Basic research on a variety of theoretical issues continued throughout 1943. By 1944, it had become clear that, while a simple and reliable "gun-type" design could be used for a uranium bomb, the considerably more complicated implosion method would be required to produce a plutonium weapon. With the successful Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer Allied landings in France on "D-Day," June 6, 1944, the war in Europe appeared to be entering its final phase. Germany ceased to be the primary intended target. General Groves and his advisers turned their sights on Japan, and the rush was on to complete the atomic bomb in time to end the war in the Pacific.

74

Manhattan Project: The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Trinity test, July 16, 1945 THE TRINITY TEST Trinity test, July 16, 1945 THE TRINITY TEST (Trinity Test Site, July 16, 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Bunker at S-10,000 Until the atomic bomb could be tested, doubt would remain about its effectiveness. The world had never seen a nuclear explosion before, and estimates varied widely on how much energy would be released. Some scientists at Los Alamos continued privately to have doubts that it would work at all. There was only enough weapons-grade uranium available for one bomb, and confidence in the gun-type design was high, so on July 14, 1945, most of the uranium bomb ("Little Boy") began its trip westward to the Pacific without its design having ever been fully tested. A test of the plutonium bomb seemed vital, however, both to confirm its novel implosion design and to gather data on nuclear explosions in general. Several plutonium bombs were now "in the pipeline" and would be available over the next few weeks and months. It was therefore decided to test one of these.

75

Manhattan Project: Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex at Hanford, 1945 HANFORD BECOMES OPERATIONAL F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex at Hanford, 1945 HANFORD BECOMES OPERATIONAL (Hanford Engineer Works, 1943-1944) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 The plutonium production facilities at the Hanford Engineer Works took shape with the same wartime urgency as did the uranium facilities at Oak Ridge. In February 1943, Colonel Matthias returned to the location he had helped select the previous December and set up a temporary headquarters. In late March, Matthias received his assignment. The three water-cooled production reactor (piles), designated by the letters B, D, and F, would be built about six miles apart on the south bank of the Columbia River. The four chemical separation plants would be built in pairs at two sites nearly ten miles south of the piles. A facility to produce slugs and perform tests would be approximately twenty miles southeast of the separation plants near Richland. Temporary quarters for construction workers would be put up at the Hanford town site, while permanent facilities for other personnel would be located down the road in Richland, safely removed from the production and separation plants. Life at Hanford would soon come to resemble that of the other "atomic boomtowns" of the Manhattan Project, Los Alamos and Oak Ridge.

76

The Manhattan Project By Terrence R. Fehner and F.G. Gosling  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Manhattan Project Manhattan Project By Terrence R. Fehner and F.G. Gosling April 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Management Office of the Executive Secretariat Office of History and Heritage Resources 1 Introduction In a national survey at the turn of the millennium, both journalists and the public ranked the dropping of the atomic bomb and the end of the Second World War as the top news stories of the twentieth-century. The Manhattan Project is the story of some of the most renowned scientists of the century combining with industry, the military, and tens of thousands of ordinary Americans working at sites across the country to translate original

77

Background report for the formerly utilized Manhattan Engineer District/Atomic Energy Commission sites program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy is conducting a program to determine radiological conditions at sites formerly used by the Army Corps of Engineers' Manhattan Engineer District and the Atomic Energy Commission in the early years of nuclear energy development. Also included in the program are sites used in the Los Alamos plutonium development program and the Trinity atomic bomb test site. Materials, equipment, buildings, and land became contaminated, primarily with naturally occurring radioactive nuclides. They were later decontaminated in accordance with the standards and survey methods in use at that time. Since then, however, radiological criteria, and proposed guidelines for release of such sites for unrestricted use have become more stringent as research on the effects of low-level radiation has progressed. In addition, records documenting some of these decontamination efforts cannot be found, and the final radiological conditions of the sites could not be adequately determined from the records. As a result, the Formerly Utilized Sites Program was initiated in 1974 to identify these formerly used sites and to reevaluate their radiological status. This report covers efforts through June 1980 to determine the radiological status of sites for which the existing conditions could not be clearly defined. Principal contractor facilities and associated properties have already been identified and activities are continuing to identify additional sites. Any new sites located will probably be subcontractor facilities and areas used for disposal of contractor waste or equipment; however, only limited information regarding this equipment and material has been collected to date. As additional information becomes available, supplemental reports will be published.

None

1980-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

78

Mitigation of Selected Hanford Site Manhattan Project and Cold War Era Artifacts  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the first time that Manhattan Project and Cold War era artifacts from the Hanford Site have been assembled within a publication. The publication presents photographic and written documentation of a number of Manhattan Project and Cold War era artifacts that were identified and tagged during assessment walk throughs of historic buildings on the Hanford Site but which could not be curated within the Hanford collection because they were too large for long-term storage and/or exhibit purposes or were radiologically contaminated. The significance of the artifacts in this publication and a proposed future appendix is based not on the individual significance of any single artifact but on their collective contribution to the science and engineering of creating plutonium and advancing nuclear technology in nuclear fuel and power.

Kennedy, Ellen P.; Harvey, David W.

2006-09-08T23:59:59.000Z

79

Manhattan Project buildings and facilities at the Hanford Site: A construction history  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document thoroughly examines the role that the Hanford Engineer Works played in the Manhattan project. The historical aspects of the buildings and facilities are characterized. An in depth look at the facilities, including their functions, methods of fabrication and appearance is given for the 100 AREAS, 200 AREAS, 300 AREAS, 500, 800 and 900 AREAS, 600 AREA, 700 AREA, 1100 AREA and temporary construction structures.

Gerber, M.S.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

80

Workers Safely Tear Down Towers at Manhattan Project Site | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

uncontaminated and in a non-posted area. Addthis Related Articles Oak Ridge's K-1206 F Fire Water Tower falls into an empty field during a recent demolition project. Oak Ridge's...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Manhattan Project: Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, 1944 OAK RIDGE AND HANFORD COME THROUGH Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, 1944 OAK RIDGE AND HANFORD COME THROUGH (Oak Ridge [Clinton] and Hanford, 1944-1945) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 None of Los Alamos's bomb design work would be of any use if Oak Ridge or Hanford did not come through with enough uranium-235 or plutonium for at least one bomb. Spending on the Manhattan Project reached $100 million per month by mid-1944, yet it was still far from clear that enough of either fissionable substance could be produced before war's end. In the summer of 1944, Oak Ridge's Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant (above) was plagued by operational problems, and the ongoing barrier crisis at the K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant threatened to render it useless. At Hanford, the first production reactor had not yet been completed. In addition, officials feared that not enough of the uranium-containing slugs to feed the pile would be available. Even assuming that enough uranium or plutonium could be delivered by Oak Ridge or Hanford, there was no guarantee that the Los Alamos laboratory would be able to design and fabricate weapons in time. Only the most optimistic in the Manhattan Project would have predicted, as Groves did when he met with Marshall in August of 1944, that a bomb or bombs powerful enough to make a difference in the current war would be ready by August 1, 1945.

82

Manhattan Project: Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Werner Heisenberg, the leader of the German atomic weapons program. ATOMIC RIVALS AND THE ALSOS MISSION Werner Heisenberg, the leader of the German atomic weapons program. ATOMIC RIVALS AND THE ALSOS MISSION (Germany and Japan, 1938-1945) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 For most of the Second World War, scientists and administrators of the Manhattan Project firmly believed that they were in a race with Germany to develop the atomic bomb. As it turns out, the German atomic program did not come close to developing a useable weapon. Allied planners were only able to confirm this, however, through the ALSOS intelligence mission to Europe toward the end of the war. Atomic research was also conducted in Japan, but as was suspected by the Allies, it did not get very far.

83

PEP Classroom Observation Protocol Project # _______ District __________________________ School ________________________________________  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PEP Classroom Observation Protocol Project # _______ District __________________________ School (mark all that apply) Demonstrate or confirm known concepts/procedures Demonstrate or confirm known concepts/procedures Explore ideas, test conjectures, look for patterns Explore ideas, test conjectures

Lee, Carl

84

Manhattan Project: CP-1 Goes Critical, Met Lab, December 2, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Painting of CP-1 going critical CP-1 GOES CRITICAL Painting of CP-1 going critical CP-1 GOES CRITICAL (Met Lab, December 2, 1942) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 While arrangements were proceeding for the construction of full-size plutonium production reactors, critical questions remained about their basic design. The Italian physicist Enrico Fermi hoped to answer some of these questions with CP-1, his experimental "Chicago Pile #1" at the University of Chicago. On December 2, 1942, after a series of frustrating delays, CP-1 first achieved a self-sustaining fission chain reaction. After the end of the war, Leslie Groves, commander of the Manhattan Project, described the first time CP-1 went critical as the single most important scientific event in the development of atomic power.

85

Manhattan Project: Early Bomb Design, Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1943-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Little Boy at Tinian Island, August 1945 EARLY BOMB DESIGN Little Boy at Tinian Island, August 1945 EARLY BOMB DESIGN (Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1943-1944) Events > Bringing it All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 Early work on the design of the atomic bomb began even as scientists continued to arrive at Los Alamos throughout 1943. The properties of uranium were reasonably well understood, those of plutonium less so, and knowledge of fission explosions entirely theoretical. That 2.2 secondary neutrons were produced when uranium-235 fissioned was accepted, but while Glenn Seaborg's team had proven in March 1941 that plutonium underwent neutron-induced fission, it was not known yet if plutonium released secondary neutrons during bombardment. Further, the exact sizes of the "cross sections" of various fissionable substances had yet to be determined in experiments using the various particle accelerators then being shipped to Los Alamos. The theoretical consensus was that fission Fission chain reaction chain reactions (left) did take place with sufficient speed to produce powerful releases of energy (and not simply result in the explosion of the critical mass itself), but only experiments could test this theory. The optimum size of the critical mass remained to be established, as did the optimum shape. When enough data were gathered to establish optimum critical mass, optimum effective mass still had to be determined. That is, it was not enough simply to start a chain reaction in a critical mass; it was necessary to start one in a mass that would release the greatest possible amount of energy before it was destroyed in the explosion.

86

Manhattan Project: Potsdam and the Final Decision to Use the Bomb, July  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Joseph Stalin, Harry Truman, and Winston Churchill at the Potsdam Conference, July 1945 POTSDAM AND THE FINAL DECISION TO USE THE BOMB Joseph Stalin, Harry Truman, and Winston Churchill at the Potsdam Conference, July 1945 POTSDAM AND THE FINAL DECISION TO USE THE BOMB (Potsdam, Germany, July 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Potsdam, July 19, 1945. Truman wrote a note on the back of the photograph in which he states incorrectly that Stalin did not know about the atomic bomb. After President Harry S. Truman received word of the success of the Trinity test, his need for the help of the Soviet Union in the war against Japan was greatly diminished. The Soviet leader, Joseph Stalin, had promised to join the war against Japan by August 15th. Truman and his advisors now were not sure they wanted this help. If use of the atomic bomb made victory possible without an invasion, then accepting Soviet help would only invite them into the discussions regarding the postwar fate of Japan. During the second week of Allied deliberations at Potsdam, on the evening of July 24, 1945, Truman approached Stalin without an interpreter and, as casually as he could, told him that the United States had a "new weapon of unusual destructive force." Stalin showed little interest, replying only that he hoped the United States would make "good use of it against the Japanese." The reason for Stalin's composure became clear later: Soviet intelligence had been receiving information about the atomic bomb program since fall 1941.

87

Manhattan Project: Final Bomb Design, Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1944-1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The first 0.11 seconds of the nuclear age, Trinity, July 16, 1945. FINAL BOMB DESIGN The first 0.11 seconds of the nuclear age, Trinity, July 16, 1945. FINAL BOMB DESIGN (Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1944-1945) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 American troops approaching the beach, D-Day, June 6, 1944. Late in 1944, Los Alamos began to shift from research to development and bomb production. Increased production at Oak Ridge and Hanford seemed to promise that enough plutonium and enriched uranium would be available for at least one bomb using each. Germany no longer was the intended primary target. The war in Europe (left) appeared to be entering its final phase, and evidence uncovered by the ALSOS mission in November 1944 indicated that the German atomic program had not gone beyond the research phase. Already by summer 1944, Groves and his advisers had turned their sights toward Japan. The atomic bomb would justify the years of effort, including both the vast expenditures and the judgment of everyone responsible, by bringing the war in the Pacific to a fiery end. J. Robert Oppenheimer Ongoing problems continued to complicate the efforts of Robert Oppenheimer (right) to finalize bomb design. Foremost among these were continuing personnel shortages, particularly of physicists, and supply difficulties. The procurement system, designed to protect the secrecy of the Los Alamos project, led to frustrating delays and, when Herb Lehr, SED, holding the Gadget's core, July 1945. combined with persistent late war shortages, proved a constant headache. The lack of contact between the remote laboratory and its supply sources exacerbated the problem, as did the relative lack of experience the academic scientists had with logistical matters. Leslie Groves and James Conant were determined not to let mundane problems compromise the bomb effort, and in fall 1944 they made several changes to prevent this possibility. Conant shipped as many scientists as could be spared from the Met Lab and Oak Ridge to Los Alamos, hired every civilian machinist he could lay his hands on, and arranged for Army enlisted men to supplement the work force (these GIs were known as SEDS ("Special Engineering Detachment"). Hartley Rowe, an experienced industrial engineer, provided help in easing the transition from research to production. Los Alamos also arranged for a rocket research team at the California Institute of Technology to aid in procurement, test fuses, and contribute to component development. These changes kept Los Alamos on track as design work reached its final stages.

88

Trinity Public Utilities District Direct Interconnection Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LEAD FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy LEAD FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy COOPERATING AGENCIES: U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation TITLE: Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Trinity Public Utilities District Direct Interconnection Project, DOE/EIS-0389 LOCATION: Trinity County, California CONTACT: For additional information on this For general information on the final environmental impact U.S. Department of Energy National statement, contact: Environmental Policy Act process, write or call: Mr. Mark J. Wieringa Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director Western Area Power Administration Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance P.O. Box 281213 Health, Safety and Security (GC-20) Lakewood, CO 80228 U.S. Department of Energy

89

Regional Drinking Water Security District Level Pilot Project  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Regional Drinking Water Security District Level Pilot Project Concept Note Milind Sohoni Head that most habitations of several talukas will face drinking water stress for much of the coming year. The central objective of the project will be to ensure regional drinking water security for a district

Sohoni, Milind

90

Sacramento Municipal Utility District Projects | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sacramento Municipal Utility District Projects Sacramento Municipal Utility District Projects Sacramento Municipal Utility District Projects November 13, 2013 - 10:45am Addthis The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) in Sacramento, California, is looking to local renewable resources to help meet its aggressive renewable energy retail sales goal of 37% by 2020. To help achieve this goal, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) provided more than $5 million in funding for five SMUD Community Renewable Energy Deployment (CommRE) projects. Simply Solar SMUD's CommRE portfolio of projects included one solar project. Initially, the utility intended to team with CalTrans and SolFocus to deploy the Sacramento Solar Highways effort. SMUD released a solicitation for a developer for the Solar Highways effort and did not receive an economically

91

Tushino - 3 district heating project/Moscow  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The contract for supply and installation of Honeywell control equipment at the district heating plant in Moscow suburb of Tushino was signed between the Mayor of Moscow and Honeywell in December 1991. Total contract value is US$3 million. The aim is to demonstrate on a pilot project the potential energy savings and improved pleat safety which can be achieved by means of electronic control of latest design. The Honeywell contract basically covers modernization of instrumentation and control of the gas fired heating plant, comprising water preparation and 4 boilers, of 100 Gcal/h each, i.e., 400 Gcal/h total. The plant is feeding the hot water network which has 60 heat exchanger stations connected. The heat exchangers (thermal rating between 2 to 10 Gcal/h each) supply hot water mainly to residential building blocks for apartment heating and domestic hot water. Honeywell`s responsibility covers engineering, supply of TDC 3000 micro-processor based control system for the boilers and DeltaNet Excel control for the Heat Exchangers. The contract also includes installation and start-up of the total control system.

Mayer, H.W.

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

Snohomish County Public Utilities District Smart Grid Project | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

District Smart Grid Project District Smart Grid Project Jump to: navigation, search Project Lead Snohomish County Public Utilities District Country United States Headquarters Location Everett, Washington Recovery Act Funding $15,825,817.00 Total Project Value $31,651,634.00 Coverage Area Coverage Map: Snohomish County Public Utilities District Smart Grid Project Coordinates 47.9789848°, -122.2020794° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

93

Modesto Irrigation District Smart Grid Project | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

District Smart Grid Project District Smart Grid Project Jump to: navigation, search Project Lead Modesto Irrigation District Recovery Act Funding $1,493,149.00 Total Project Value $2,986,298.00 Coverage Area Coverage Map: Modesto Irrigation District Smart Grid Project Coordinates 37.6390972°, -120.9968782° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

94

Stanton County Public Power District Smart Grid Project | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Stanton County Public Power District Smart Grid Project Stanton County Public Power District Smart Grid Project Jump to: navigation, search Project Lead Stanton County Public Power District Country United States Headquarters Location Stanton, Nebraska Recovery Act Funding $397,000.00 Total Project Value $794,000.00 Coverage Area Coverage Map: Stanton County Public Power District Smart Grid Project Coordinates 41.950284°, -97.2239336° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

95

Manhattan Project: DuPont and Hanford, Hanford Engineer Works, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The president of DuPont, Walter Carpenter, with Generals Levin H. Campbell, Everett Hughes, and Charles T. Harris. DUPONT AND HANFORD The president of DuPont, Walter Carpenter, with Generals Levin H. Campbell, Everett Hughes, and Charles T. Harris. DUPONT AND HANFORD (Hanford Engineer Works, 1942) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 The scientists of the Met Lab had the technical expertise to design a production pile, but construction and management on an industrial scale required an outside contractor. The DuPont Corporation was an ideal candidate, but the giant chemical firm was hesitant to join the project due to concern over accusations that it had profiteered during World War I. On October 3, 1942, DuPont agreed to design and build the chemical separation plant for the production pile facility then planned for Oak Ridge. Leslie Groves tried to entice further DuPont participation by having the firm prepare an appraisal of the pile (reactor) project and by placing three DuPont staff members on the Lewis Committee. DuPont ultimately agreed to become the primary contractor for plutonium-related work, but because of continuing sensitivity about its public image its contract called for a total payment of only dollar over actual costs. In addition, DuPont vowed to stay out of the bomb business after the war and offered all patents to the United States government.

96

Manhattan Project: A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb<!--Include title  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

President Franklin Roosevelt's note to Vannevar Bush giving Bush the tentative go-ahead to build the atomic bomb. A TENTATIVE DECISION TO BUILD THE BOMB President Franklin Roosevelt's note to Vannevar Bush giving Bush the tentative go-ahead to build the atomic bomb. A TENTATIVE DECISION TO BUILD THE BOMB Washington, D.C.(1941-1942) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 Vannevar Bush moved swiftly to take advantage of the positive MAUD Report. Without waiting for Arthur Compton's latest committee to finish its work confirming the MAUD Committee's conclusions, Bush on October 9, 1941, met with President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Vice President Henry A. Wallace (who had been briefed on uranium research in July). Bush summarized the British findings, discussed cost and duration of a bomb project, and emphasized the uncertainty of the situation. He also received the President's permission to explore construction needs with the Army. Roosevelt instructed him to move as quickly as possible but not to go beyond research and development. Bush, then, was to find out if a bomb could be built and at what cost but not to proceed to the production stage without further presidential authorization. Roosevelt indicated that he could find a way to finance the project and asked Bush to draft a letter so that the British government could be approached "at the top.

97

Elkton Schools District Wind Project | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Elkton Schools District Wind Project Elkton Schools District Wind Project Jump to: navigation, search Name Elkton Schools District Wind Project Facility Elkton Schools District Sector Wind energy Facility Type Community Wind Location SD Coordinates 44.229973°, -96.482101° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.229973,"lon":-96.482101,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

98

Juneau School District Wind Project | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

School District Wind Project School District Wind Project Jump to: navigation, search Name Juneau School District Wind Project Facility Juneau School District Sector Wind energy Facility Type Community Wind Location AK Coordinates 58.299496°, -134.413254° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":58.299496,"lon":-134.413254,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

99

Townsend School District Wind Project | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Townsend School District Wind Project Townsend School District Wind Project Jump to: navigation, search Name Townsend School District Wind Project Facility Townsend School District Sector Wind energy Facility Type Community Wind Location MT Coordinates 46.321682°, -111.521049° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.321682,"lon":-111.521049,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

100

Yankton School District Wind Project | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

School District Wind Project School District Wind Project Jump to: navigation, search Name Yankton School District Wind Project Facility Yankton School District Sector Wind energy Facility Type Community Wind Location SD Coordinates 42.896858°, -97.41584° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.896858,"lon":-97.41584,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Manhattan Project: Nagasaki  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

NAGASAKI IMAGES NAGASAKI IMAGES Nagasaki, Japan (August 9, 1945) Resources > Photo Gallery Aerial photographs of the mushroom cloud forming over Nagasaki, August 9, 1945. The photographs are courtesy the Federation of American Scientists, except for the last one, which is courtesy the Office of War Information (via the National Archives). Scroll down to see each image separately. At the bottom is an additional photograph similar to the fourth photograph, courtesy the Library of Congress. (Click here for a 1.9 MB .tif version of the this image.) First Nagasaki Cloud Photograph Second Nagasaki Cloud Photograph Third Nagasaki Cloud Photograph Fourth Nagasaki Cloud Photograph Mushroom Cloud over Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Mushroom Cloud over Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Click on a link below to return to:

102

Manhattan Project: Blast  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Blast (Animation) Blast (Animation) Yucca Flat, Nevada (March 17, 1953) Resources > Photo Gallery Blast Animation The eight images above are a sequence of photographs of a house constructed 3,500 feet from "ground zero" at the Nevada Test Site being destroyed by the Annie test shot. The only source of light was the blast itself, detonated on March 17, 1953. The final image is two-and-one-third seconds after detonation. In the second image the house is actually on fire, but in the third image the fire has already been blown out by the blast. Annie, part of the "Upshot-Knothole" test series, had a yield of 16 kilotons, roughly the same size as the Trinity, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki explosions. Two photographs of the Annie mushroom cloud are at the bottom of this page.

103

Manhattan Project: Photo Gallery  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer PHOTO GALLERY Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer PHOTO GALLERY Resources Additional information is available regarding the following "animated gifs" and other photographs: Alpha Racetrack, Y-12 Berkeley Meeting The "Big House" Blast (Animation) Events Images First Atomic Energy Commissioners Fuller Lodge F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex Hiroshima Images Image Retouching Kasparov, Kamen, and Kheifits Los Alamos Scientists Los Alamos Street Scene "Met Lab" Alumni Nagasaki Images Nixon and the Atomic Pioneers People Images Places Images Potsdam Note "Rad Lab" Staff S-1 Committee San Ildefonso Pueblo Party Science Images Solvay Physics Conference Tech Area Gallery (Large) Tech Area Gallery (Small) Trinity Images Trinity (Color Photograph)

104

Manhattan Project: Places Images  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

PLACES IMAGES PLACES IMAGES Resources > Photo Gallery Scroll down to see each of these images individually. The images are: 1. Remains of a Shinto Shrine, Nagasaki, October 1945 (courtesy the United States Marine Corps, Lieutenant R. J. Battersby, photographer, via the National Archives); 2. University of California, Berkeley, 1940 (courtesy the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory); 3. Aerial photograph of the Trinity Site after the test (courtesy the Federation of American Scientists); 4. Aerial photograph of Hiroshima before the bombing; 5. Columbia University, 1903 (courtesy the Library of Congress; this photograph originated from the Detroit Publishing Company; it was a 1949 gift to the Library of Congress from the State Historical Society of Colorado).

105

Manhattan Project: Trinity Images  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

IMAGES IMAGES Trinity Test Site (July 16, 1945) Resources > Photo Gallery The first 0.11 seconds of the Nuclear Age These seven photographs of the Trinity test were taken by time-lapse cameras. The last is 109 milliseconds, or 0.109 seconds, after detonation. Scroll down to view each individual image. The photographs are courtesy the Los Alamos National Laboratory, via the Federation of American Scientists web site. The animation is original to the Office of History and Heritage Resources. The dawn of the Nuclear Age (Trinity image #1) The dawn of the Nuclear Age Trinity image #2 Trinity image #3 Trinity image #4 Trinity image #5 Trinity, 0.09 seconds after detonation (Trinity image #6) Trinity, 0.09 seconds after detonation Trinity, 0.11 seconds after detonation (Trinity image #7)

106

Manhattan Project: Events Images  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Resources Resources About this Site How to Navigate this Site Library Maps Note on Sources Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know Photo Gallery Site Map Sources and Notes Suggested Readings EVENTS IMAGES Resources > Photo Gallery Page Content Here Scroll down to see each of these images individually. The images are: 1. Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard (courtesy the Federation of American Scientists); 2. Painting of CP-1 going critical (courtesy the National Archives); 3. An Alpha Racetrack inside the Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant, Clinton Engineer Works, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; 4. Eric Jette, Charles Critchfield, and J. Robert Oppenheimer, Los Alamos, New Mexico (this photograph is reprinted from Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos: Beginning of an Era, 1943-1945 (Los Alamos: Public Relations Office, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, ca. 1967-1971), 20);

107

Manhattan Project: Science Images  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SCIENCE IMAGES SCIENCE IMAGES Resources > Photo Gallery Scroll down to see each of these images individually. The images are: 1. Fission (this graphic is adapted from a graphic originally produced by the Washington State Department of Health; the modifications are original to the History Division, now Office of History and Heritage Resources, 2003); 2. Fat Man (plutonium bomb), August 1945 (courtesy the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (via theNational Archives)); 3. F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex Hanford, Washington, 1945; 4. A Cockroft-Walton machine at Los Alamos, New Mexico (courtesy the Los Alamos National Laboratory; it is reprinted in John F. Hogerton, ed., "Cockroft-Walton Machine," The Atomic Energy Deskbook (New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation, 1963, prepared under the auspices of the Division of Technical Information, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission), 102);

108

Manhattan Project: Resources  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

web site, a number of additional resources are also provided: Reference Materials Maps Photo Gallery To Learn More Library Suggested Readings Background on this Site About this...

109

Sacramento Municipal Utility District Smart Grid Project | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sacramento Municipal Utility District Sacramento Municipal Utility District Country United States Headquarters Location Sacramento, California Recovery Act Funding $127506261 Total Project Value $308406477 Coverage Area Coverage Map: Sacramento Municipal Utility District Smart Grid Project Coordinates 38.5815719°, -121.4943996° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

110

Cuming County Public Power District Smart Grid Project | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Cuming County Public Power District Cuming County Public Power District Country United States Headquarters Location West Point, Nebraska Recovery Act Funding $1,874,994.00 Total Project Value $3,749,988.00 Coverage Area Coverage Map: Cuming County Public Power District Smart Grid Project Coordinates 41.8416659°, -96.7086432° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

111

Central Lincoln People's Utility District Smart Grid Project | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Central Lincoln People's Utility District Central Lincoln People's Utility District Country United States Headquarters Location Newport, Oregon Recovery Act Funding $9,894,450.00 Total Project Value $19,788,900.00 Coverage Area Coverage Map: Central Lincoln People's Utility District Smart Grid Project Coordinates 44.6367836°, -124.0534505° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

112

Project Cost The Bondo District is  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

their livelihood. Community members dig wells up to 200 feet deep by hand to find water, or walk miles to Lake building materials for fu- ture use in the project. It was confirmed that much of the water is contaminated members can treat their water on an individual basis. The project will be considered successful when

Reisslein, Martin

113

Hospital chilled water loop assessment Miami District Cooling project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a progress report on a Miami District cooling project for Civic Center Hospitals. An underground distribution system to link the hospitals was devised to minimize capital cost and the maximize savings on operating costs. This study develops a technical and economic analysis and a proposal management structure to provide an equitable distribution of costs and savings. 11 figs., 19 tabs. (FSD)

Not Available

1990-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

NETL: Gasification Systems - Projects by State with Congressional District  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Projects by State Projects by State Gasification Systems Projects by State with Congressional District State Performer Congressional District Alabama National Carbon Capture Center at the Power Systems Development Facility-Project List Modification of the Developmental Pressure Decoupled Advanced Coal (PDAC) Feeder Long-Term Refractory Durability Tests (Transport Gasifier) Long-Term Candle Filter Tests (Transport Gasifier) Water-Gas Shift Tests to Reduce Steam Use Southern Company Services, Inc. AL07 High Hydrogen, Low Methane Syngas from Low-Rank Coals for Coal-to-Liquids Production Southern Research Institute AL07 California Dry Solids Pump Coal Feed Technology Aerojet Rocketdyne CA30 Colorado A Cost-Effective Oxygen Separation System Based on Open Gradient Magnetic Field by Polymer Beads ITN Energy Systems CO01

115

Trinity Public Utilities District Direct Interconnection Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Final Environmental Impact Statement DOE/EIS-0395 JULY 2007 COVER SHEET LEAD FEDERAL AGENCIES: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Western Area Power Administration (Western), and Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) COOPERATING AGENCIES: U.S. Department of the Navy (Navy), U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), City of Yuma TITLE: San Luis Rio Colorado Project Final Environmental Impact Statement, DOE/EIS-0395 LOCATION: Yuma County, Arizona CONTACT: For additional information on DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) activities, please contact Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, GC-20, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue S.W., Washington D.C. 20585, phone: 1-800-472-2756 or visit the

116

MHK Projects/Third Reach District | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Reach District Reach District < MHK Projects Jump to: navigation, search << Return to the MHK database homepage Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":5,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"500px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"File:Aquamarine-marker.png","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":29.9538,"lon":-90.0292,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"http:\/\/prod-http-80-800498448.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com\/w\/images\/7\/74\/Aquamarine-marker.png","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

117

Site surveillance and maintenance program for Palos Park, report for 1985. [Part of Manhattan Engineering District project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The results of the environmental monitoring program conducted at Site A/Plot M in the Palos Park area for CY 1985 are presented. The monitoring program is the ongoing remedial action that resulted from the radiological characterization of the site. The current program consists of sample collection and analysis of air, surface and subsurface water, and bottom sediment to determine the migration pathway of water from the burial ground (Plot M) to the wells, establish if other buried radionuclides have migrated, and otherwise characterize the radiological environment of the area. Earlier studies had determined that hydrogen-3 (as tritiated water) migrated from the burial ground and was detected in two nearby hand-pumped picnic wells. Hydrogen-3 in the Red Gate Woods picnic well continued to show the same pattern of elevated levels in the winter and low concentrations in the summer, but the magnitude of the winter peak (2.5 nCi/L) was significantly less than in earlier years. Tritiated water continues to be monitored at a number of wells, boreholes, and surface streams where it has been detected in the past. For many years it was the only radionuclide found to have migrated until recent measurements indicated the presence of strontium-90 in borehole water next to Plot M. The presence of the strontium-90 is an indicator of migration of radionuclides other than tritiated water from the Plot. However, the results of the program indicates that the radioactivity remaining at Site A/Plot M does not endanger the health or safety of the public visiting the site or those living in the vicinity.

Golchert, N.W.; Sedlet, J.

1986-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Atomic Bombs, Winning the War and Women in Pants: Voices of the Manhattan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Atomic Bombs, Winning the War and Women in Pants: Voices of the Atomic Bombs, Winning the War and Women in Pants: Voices of the Manhattan Project Speak of the Nation's History Atomic Bombs, Winning the War and Women in Pants: Voices of the Manhattan Project Speak of the Nation's History November 28, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Manhattan Project veteran Ralph Gates (far right) celebrates Christmas in 1945. Gates contributed to the Voices of the Manhattan Project, a storytelling project launched by the Atomic Heritage Foundation and Los Alamos Historical Society. Manhattan Project veteran Ralph Gates (far right) celebrates Christmas in 1945. Gates contributed to the Voices of the Manhattan Project, a storytelling project launched by the Atomic Heritage Foundation and Los Alamos Historical Society. WASHINGTON, D.C. - A year out of high school in 1944, Nashville native

119

Manhattan Project: S-1 Committee  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Resources Resources About this Site How to Navigate this Site Library Maps Note on Sources Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know Photo Gallery Site Map Sources and Notes Suggested Readings S-1 COMMITTEE Bohemian Grove (September 13, 1942) Resources > Photo Gallery S-1 Committee, Bohemian Grove, September 13, 1942 S-1 Committee members at Bohemian Grove, September 13, 1942. Left to right: Harold C. Urey, Ernest O. Lawrence, James B. Conant, Lyman J. Briggs, Eger V. Murphree, and Arthur H. Compton. The photograph is courtesy Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Click on a link below to return to: Civilian Organizations Enter the Army, 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD)

120

Manhattan Project: Los Alamos Scientists  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Resources Resources About this Site How to Navigate this Site Library Maps Note on Sources Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know Photo Gallery Site Map Sources and Notes Suggested Readings LOS ALAMOS SCIENTISTS Los Alamos (Laboratory) (August 1946) Resources > Photo Gallery Los Alamos, August 1946 Scientists attending a colloquium at Los Alamos, August 1946. Left to right, first row: Norris E. Bradbury, John H. Manley, Enrico Fermi, J. M. B. Kellogg. Second row: Robert Oppenheimer, Richard P. Feynman, Phil B. Porter. Third row: Gregory Breit (partially hidden), Arthur Hemmendinger, Arthur D. Schelberg. The photograph is courtesy Los Alamos National Laboratory. The identifications are from Richard G. Hewlett and Francis Duncan, Atomic Shield, 1947-1952: Volume II, A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission (Washington: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1972), opposite page 46.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Manhattan Project: Facts About Fallout  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

FACTS ABOUT FALLOUT FACTS ABOUT FALLOUT Federal Civil Defense Administration, National Archives (1955) Resources > Library Below is Facts About Fallout, an eight-page civil defense pamphlet on fallout published by the Federal Civil Defense Administration in 1955. At the bottom of this page there are also three photographs of government-suggested fallout shelter designs and a "Fallout Shelter" sign. The pamphlet is courtesy the National Archives, as are the three photographs of the fallout shelters (courtesy the Federal Emergency Management Agency). The image of the "fallout shelter" sign is courtesy the Environmental Protection Agency. Facts About Fallout, p. 1 Facts About Fallout, p. 2 Facts About Fallout, p. 3 Facts About Fallout, p. 4 Facts About Fallout, p. 5

122

Manhattan Project: Difficult Choices, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

"Met Lab" alumni at the University of Chicago -- Fermi is on the far left of the front row; Zinn is on Fermi's left; Anderson is on the far right of the front row; and Szilard is over Anderson's right shoulder. DIFFICULT CHOICES "Met Lab" alumni at the University of Chicago -- Fermi is on the far left of the front row; Zinn is on Fermi's left; Anderson is on the far right of the front row; and Szilard is over Anderson's right shoulder. DIFFICULT CHOICES (1942) Events More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 By early 1942, as the United States suffered a series of military defeats in the Pacific, top officials in Washington tentatively had decided to proceed with the construction of an atomic bomb. Two paths seemed possible. A uranium bomb could be achieved if sufficient uranium-235 could be produced by one or more of the three isotope separation methods under consideration: gaseous diffusion, centrifuge, and electromagnetic. A plutonium bomb might provide a quicker route, but it required demonstration that plutonium could be produced in a uranium pile and then be separated in usable quantities. To this end, Arthur Compton consolidated most plutonium research at the new Metallurgical Laboratory (Met Lab) at the University of Chicago.

123

Manhattan Project: Trinity (Color Photograph)  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

(COLOR PHOTOGRAPH) (COLOR PHOTOGRAPH) Trinity Test Site (July 16, 1945) Resources > Photo Gallery Trinity, July 16, 1945 (This is the page for the photograph only; see "The Trinity Test" for more information about the test itself.) The photo is courtesy Los Alamos National Laboratories; it is reproduced on the front cover of Los Alamos: Beginning of an Era, 1943-1945 (Los Alamos: Public Relations Office, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, ca. 1967-1971). The inside of the front cover describes the history of the photograph this way: Although colored movies were taken of the Trinity test, they were of poor quality and have since deteriorated. This cover photograph, also showing the ravages of time, is the only existing color shot of the test. It was taken, surprisingly enough, by an amateur using his own camera. Jack Aeby, now [ca. 1967-1971] of H-6, was working at Trinity with Emilio Segrè studying delayed gamma rays. Segrè secured permission for Aeby to carry his camera to the site to record the group's activities. Came the test and, as Aeby says, 'it was there so I shot it.' The picture was taken from just outside Base Camp with a Perfex 33 camera using 33 mm film. The photograph provided the basis for the Theoretical Division's earliest calculations of the Trinity weapon's yield and was shortly confiscated by the Army and first published after the announcement was made of the bombing of Japan.

124

Manhattan Project: Einstein's Letter, 1939  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 EINSTEIN'S LETTER Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 EINSTEIN'S LETTER (1939) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 On October 11, 1939, Alexander Sachs, Wall Street economist and longtime friend and unofficial advisor to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, met with the President to discuss a letter written by Albert Einstein the previous August (right). Einstein had written to inform Roosevelt that recent research on fission chain reactions utilizing uranium made it probable that large amounts of power could be produced by a chain reaction and that, by harnessing this power, the construction of "extremely powerful bombs" was conceivable. Einstein believed the German government was actively supporting research in this area and urged the United States government to do likewise. Sachs read from a cover letter he had prepared and briefed Roosevelt on the main points contained in Einstein's letter. Initially the President was noncommittal and expressed concern over locating the necessary funds, but at a second meeting over breakfast the next morning Roosevelt became convinced of the value of exploring atomic energy.

125

EA-0923: Winnett School District Boiler Replacement Project, Winnett, Montana  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to replace the Winnett School District complex's existing oil-fired heating system with a new coal-fired heating system with funds...

126

The Walls Come Tumbling Down: Decontamination and Demolition of 29 Manhattan Project and Cold War-Era Buildings and Structures at Los Alamos National Laboratory-12301  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

When the nation's top scientists and military leaders converged on Los Alamos, New Mexico in the 1943, to work on the Manhattan Project, the facilities they used to conduct their top-secret work were quickly constructed and located in the middle of what eventually became the Los Alamos town site. After one of these early facilities caught on fire, it seemed wise to build labs and production facilities farther away from the homes of the town's residents. They chose to build facilities on what was then known as Delta Prime (DP) Mesa and called it Technical Area 21, or TA-21. With wartime urgency, a number of buildings were built at TA-21, some in as little as a few months. Before long, DP Mesa was populated with several nondescript metal and cinder-block buildings, including what became, immediately following the war, the world's first plutonium production facility. TA-21 also housed labs that used hazardous chemicals and analyzed americium, tritium and plutonium. TA-21 was a bustling center of research and production for the next several decades. Additional buildings were built there in the 1960's, but by the 1990's many of them had reached the end of their service lives. Labs and offices were moved to newer, more modern buildings. When Los Alamos National Laboratory received $212 million in funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in July 2009 for environmental cleanup projects, about $73 million of the funds were earmarked to decontaminate and demolish 21 of the old buildings at TA-21. Although some D and D of TA-21 buildings was performed in the 1990's, many of the facilities at DP Site remained relatively untouched for nearly three decades following their final operational use. In 2006, there were over three dozen buildings or structures on the mesa to be removed so that soil cleanup could be completed (and the land made available for transfer and reuse). The total footprint of buildings across the mesa was approximately 18,580 m{sup 2} (200,000 ft{sup 2}). The initially approved baseline for the ARRA D and D Project was to remove 22 buildings and structures that included approximately 14,680 m{sup 2} (158,000 ft{sup 2}) of footprint. By employing efficiencies during subcontracting, demolition, and waste segregation, the savings allowed an additional 1,580 m{sup 2} (17,000 ft{sup 2}) of footprint to be removed using ARRA funds. Additionally, the lessons learned from this experience were used to apply NNSA funding to the removal of six additional non-contaminated buildings and structures. In the end, 29 buildings and structures, including stacks, cooling towers and tanks, were removed from the mesa. The entire DP East area was cleared of buildings and sub-grade structures and the soils cleaned to residential standards. The total footprint reduction at TA-21 as a result of this effort was in excess of 17,650 m{sup 2} (190,000 ft{sup 2}). The use of a Laboratory self-performance team to start demolition of non-contaminated structures resulted in steady work performance early in the project while subcontracts were being put in place to perform more complicated abatement and contaminated demolition activities. Most importantly, there were no serious worker injuries and the minor injuries recorded were those common to construction type activities. Extensive monitoring along the site boundary demonstrated that no hazardous chemicals or radioactive contamination were released and radiological dose to the public was negligible. The ARRA demolition activities were completed six months in advance of the deadline for employing ARRA funds. Additionally, over 17,585 m{sup 3} (23,000 yds{sup 3}) of building demolition debris was safely removed from DP Mesa. All of the major buildings have been removed, unencumbered access to the SWMUs that are required to be cleaned up by the Consent Order with the state of New Mexico, has been achieved, and a significant portion of the mesa has been prepared to support a process that will eventually transfer this land from federal government control for further use. (authors)

Chaloupka, Allan B.; Finn, Kevin P.; Parsons, Duane A. [Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

BSU GHP District Heating and Cooling System (PHASE I) Geothermal Project |  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

BSU GHP District Heating and Cooling System (PHASE I) Geothermal Project BSU GHP District Heating and Cooling System (PHASE I) Geothermal Project Jump to: navigation, search Last modified on July 22, 2011. Project Title BSU GHP District Heating and Cooling System (PHASE I) Project Type / Topic 1 Recovery Act - Geothermal Technologies Program: Ground Source Heat Pumps Project Type / Topic 2 Topic Area 1: Technology Demonstration Projects Project Description The Project will result in the construction of the largest ground source geothermal-based closed loop GHP heating and cooling system in America. Phase I of the Project began with the design, competitive bidding, and contract award for the drilling and "looping" of 1,800 boreholes in sports fields and parking lots on the north side of campus. The components of the entire Project include: (1) 4,100 four hundred feet deep boreholes spread over about 25 acres of sport fields and parking lots (Phase I will involve 1,800 boreholes spread over about 8 acres); (2) Each Phase will require a district energy station (about 9,000 sq. feet) that will each contain (A) two 2,500 ton heat pump chillers (which can produce 150 degree (F) water for heating purposes and 42 degree (F) water for cooling purposes); and (B) a variety of water pumps, electrical and other control systems; (3) a closed loop piping system that continuously circulates about 20,000 gallons of water (no anti-freeze) per minute through the boreholes, energy stations, a (two pipe) hot water loop and a (two pipe) chilled water loop (no water is drawn from the aquifer at any point in the operation); and (4) hot/chilled water-to-air heat exchangers in each of the buildings.

128

Geothermal district heating systems  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Ten district heating demonstration projects and their present status are described. The projects are Klamath County YMCA, Susanville District Heating, Klamath Falls District Heating, Reno Salem Plaza Condominium, El Centro Community Center Heating/Cooling, Haakon School and Business District Heating, St. Mary's Hospital, Diamond Ring Ranch, Pagosa Springs District Heating, and Boise District Heating.

Budney, G.S.; Childs, F.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

MHK Projects/Western Irrigation District | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

< MHK Projects < MHK Projects Jump to: navigation, search << Return to the MHK database homepage Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":5,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"500px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"File:Aquamarine-marker.png","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":51.0841,"lon":-113.784,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"http:\/\/prod-http-80-800498448.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com\/w\/images\/7\/74\/Aquamarine-marker.png","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

130

Microsoft PowerPoint - Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Branson Conf. 6-2-10 .pptx  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Vicksburg Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Blakely Mountain Hydro DeGray Hydro DeGray Hydro Narrows Hydro Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #1 ll Rotor Installation Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 l l Coil Removal Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 l Pole Key Design Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 i l i h l d Removing Pole Key With Sledge Hammer Blakely Rewind Unit #2 Bigger Hammer & Operator Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 l h Removing Rotor Poles With A Saw Blakely Mountain Surge Tank f b h Refurbishment Blakely Mountain Surge Tank f b h Refurbishment Blakely Mountain Switchyard d Disconnect Upgrades Blakely Mountain Switchyard l Oil Containment DeGray Rewind Unit # 2 bl Disassembly DeGray Rewind Unit #2 l l First Coil Samples

131

Finding of No Significant Impact for the I'SOT Canby District Heating Project, Modoc County, California Final Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Coiorado 80401-3393 Coiorado 80401-3393 March 7, 2003 DOEEA-1460 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT For the IN SEARCH OF TRUTH CANBY DISTRICT HEATING PROJECT CANBY, MODOC COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy, Golden Field Office ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) conducted an Environmental ,4ssessment (EA) of the In Search of Truth (I'SOT) Canby District Heating Project, Modoc County, California, to evaluate potential environmental impacts of project construction and operations for three years. DOE would provide partial fundin g, through its National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), to I'SOT for the development and field verification of a small-scale, geothermal district heating system. Local district heating projects have the potential for widespread

132

City of Manhattan Beach Community Development  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Sacramento, Ca. 95814 Attention: Joe Loyer j mloycr@cncrgy.stalc.ca.us Subject: City of Manhattan Beach the City of Manhattan Beach adoption of our local more stringent energy efficiency standards. In accordance California Codes that includes the energy standards amendment and a study with supporting energy saving data

133

Project Profile: The Sacramento Municipal Utility District Consumnes Power Plant Solar Augmentation Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), under the Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) Heat Integration for Baseload Renewable Energy Development (HIBRED) program, is demonstrating a hybrid CSP solar energy system that takes advantage of an existing electrical generator for its power block and transmission interconnection.

134

RECIPIENT: District Energy u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE to analyze the entire construction of the Adult Detention Facility and the District Energy Center. The construction of the Adult Detention Facility and District Energy...

135

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Hidalgo County Irrigation District No. 2 (San Juan) - Relining Lateral A - Final  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

irrigation district rehabilitation efforts and largely responsible for successful collaborative efforts of involved stakeholders. We wish him well with his new endeavors with the Montana Forestry Service. Nick... District No. 2 (San Juan) page xvi of 52 Economic and Conservation Analysis Features of RGIDECON? RGIDECON? is an Excel spreadsheet developed by TAES/TCE economists to investigate the economic and conservation merits of capital renovation projects proposed...

Popp, Michael; Robinson, John; Sturdivant, Allen; Lacewell, Ronald; Rister, Edward

136

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Project: Hidalgo County Irrigation District No. 2 (San Juan) - Relining Lateral A Preliminary  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

; Nick Palacios. These engineers and managers with the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) have provided valuable feedback on the methodology and data, as well as insights on accommodating the requirements.../TCE economists to investigate the economic and conservation merits of capital renovation projects proposed by Rio Grande Basin Irrigation Districts. RGIDECON facilitates integration and analysis of information pertaining to proposed projects costs, productive...

Rister, M. Edward; Lacewell, Ronald D.; Sturdivant, Allen W.; Robinson, John R.C.; Popp, Michael C.

137

I'SOT Canby District Heating Project, Modoc County, California Final Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 17, 2003 Dear Stakeholder: SUBJECT: NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED IN SEARCH OF TRUTH CANBY DISTRICT HEATING PROJECT, MODOC COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (DOE/EA 1460) The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Golden Field Office (GO) has issued the final Environmental Assessment (EA) and a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the subject geothermal project. These documents are available online in the GO electronic reading room at www.golden.doe.gov. Copies of the documents can be obtained by contacting Steve Blazek at the address and telephone number listed below. GO has prepared the final EA and FONSI in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and DOE's NEPA implementation guidance.

138

Manhattan Project: More Piles and Plutonium, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

"Met Lab" alumni at the University of Chicago -- Fermi is on the far left of the front row; Zinn is on Fermi's left; Anderson is on the far right of the front row; and Szilard is over Anderson's right shoulder. MORE PILES AND PLUTONIUM "Met Lab" alumni at the University of Chicago -- Fermi is on the far left of the front row; Zinn is on Fermi's left; Anderson is on the far right of the front row; and Szilard is over Anderson's right shoulder. MORE PILES AND PLUTONIUM (1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 At the University of Chicago, meanwhile, Arthur Compton had consolidated most fission research at his new Metallurgical Laboratory(Met Lab). Compton decided to combine all pile research by stages. He continued to fund Enrico Fermi's pile research at Columbia University, while Fermi began preparations to move his work to Chicago. Funding continued as well for the theoretical work of Eugene Wigner at Princeton and of J. Robert Oppenheimer at the University of California, Berkeley. Compton also appointed Leo Szilard head of materials acquisition and arranged for Glenn T. Seaborg to move his plutonium work from Berkeley to Chicago in April 1942.

139

Manhattan Project: The Maud Report, 1941  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The first page of the MAUD Report. THE MAUD REPORT The first page of the MAUD Report. THE MAUD REPORT (1941) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 The most influential study of the feasibility of the atomic bomb originated on the other side of the Atlantic. In July 1941, just days after finding the second National Academy of Sciences report so disappointing, Vannevar Bush received a copy of a draft report forwarded from the National Defense Research Committee liaison office in London. The report, prepared by a group codenamed the MAUD Committee and set up by the British in spring 1940 to study the possibility of developing a nuclear weapon, maintained that a sufficiently purified critical mass of uranium-235 could fission even with fast neutrons. Building upon theoretical work on atomic bombs performed by refugee physicists Rudolf Peierls and Otto Frisch in 1940 and 1941, the MAUD report estimated that a critical mass of ten kilograms would be large enough to produce an enormous explosion. A bomb this size could be loaded on existing aircraft and be ready in approximately two years.

140

Manhattan Project: More Uranium Research, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Cubes of uranium metal, Los Alamos, 1945 MORE URANIUM RESEARCH Cubes of uranium metal, Los Alamos, 1945 MORE URANIUM RESEARCH (1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 During the first half of 1942, several routes to a bomb via uranium continued to be explored. At Columbia University, Harold Urey worked on the gaseous diffusion and centrifuge systems for isotope separation in the codenamed SAM (Substitute or Special Alloy Metals) Laboratory. At Berkeley, Ernest Lawrence continued his investigations on electromagnetic separation using the "calutron" he had converted from his thirty-seven-inch cyclotron. Phillip Abelson, who had moved from the Carnegie Institution and the National Bureau of Standards to the Naval Research Laboratory, continued his work on liquid thermal diffusion but with few positive results, and he had lost all contact with the S-1 Section of the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Meanwhile Eger Murphree's group hurriedly studied ways to move from laboratory experiments to production facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Manhattan Project: Los Alamos Street Scene  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

LOS ALAMOS STREET SCENE LOS ALAMOS STREET SCENE Los Alamos (The Town) Resources > Photo Gallery Los Alamos street scene. Fuller Lodge and the "Big House" are visible in the distance (see below). Above is a view of Los Alamos (looking north). In the distance, Fuller Lodge and the "Big House" are visible to the left and right, respectively (see below). The photograph is reproduced from Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos: Beginning of an Era, 1943-1945 (Los Alamos: Public Relations Office, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, ca. 1967-1971), 13. The labels and "close-ups" below were made by the Office of History and Heritage Resources. Los Alamos street scene (labeled) Close-up of Fuller Lodge Close-up of the "Big House" Click on a link below to return to:

142

Manhattan Project: Einstein's Letter to Roosevelt  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

EINSTEIN'S LETTER TO ROOSEVELT Albert Einstein (with Leo Szilard) to President Franklin Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 Resources > Library Below are photographs of both pages of the letter written by Albert Einstein, with the help of Leo Szilard, to President Franklin Roosevelt on August 2, 1939, warning Roosevelt of the dangers posed by nuclear energy. Click here for more background on the writing of this letter. The photographs of the pages themselves are courtesy the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum. First page of Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939. Second page of Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939. Click on a link below to return to Einstein's Letter, 1939 Albert Einstein Library Sources and notes for this page.

143

Manhattan Project: Adventures Inside the Atom  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

ADVENTURES INSIDE THE ATOM ADVENTURES INSIDE THE ATOM General Electric, National Archives (1948) Resources > Library Below is Adventures Inside the Atom, a comic book history of nuclear energy that was produced in 1948 by the General Electric Company. Scroll down to view the full-size images of each page. This publication was produced at the request of the the Assistant Manager for Public Education, Oak Ridge Operations Office, Atomic Energy Commission. It is reproduced here via the National Archives. Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 1 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 2 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 3 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 4 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 5 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 6 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 7 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 8 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 9

144

Manhattan Project: Y-12 Construction, 1943  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Groundbreaking for Y-12, Oak Ridge Y-12: CONSTRUCTION Groundbreaking for Y-12, Oak Ridge Y-12: CONSTRUCTION (Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1943) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 Groundbreaking for the Alpha plant of the Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant took place at Oak Ridge on February 18, 1943 (right). Soon blueprints could not be produced fast enough to keep up with construction as Stone & Webster labored to meet Leslie Groves's deadline. The Beta facility was actually begun before formal authorization. While laborers were aggressively recruited, there was always a shortage of workers skilled Y-12 construction, Oak Ridge enough to perform jobs according to the rigid specifications. (A further complication was that some tasks could be performed only by workers with security clearances.) Huge amounts of material had to be obtained (38 million board feet of lumber, for instance), and the magnets needed so much copper for windings that the Army had to borrow almost 15,000 tons of silver bullion from the United States Treasury to fabricate into strips and wind on to coils as a substitute for copper. Treasury silver was also used to manufacture the busbars that ran around the top of the racetracks.

145

Manhattan Project: Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. ATOMIC DISCOVERIES Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. ATOMIC DISCOVERIES (1890s-1939) Events A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 Philosophers of Ancient Greece reasoned that all matter in the universe must be composed of fundamental, unchangeable, and indivisible objects, which they called "atoma" ("ατoµα"). The exact nature of these atoms remained elusive, however, despite centuries of attempts by alchemists to create a "philosopher's stone" that could transmute atoms of lead to gold, prove the Greeks wrong, and make its inventors Modern model of an atom very rich. It was only in the late 1890s and the early twentieth-century that this view of a solid atom, bouncing around the universe like a billiard ball, was replaced by an atom that resembled more a miniature solar system, its electrons orbiting around a small nucleus. Explorations into the nature of the atom from 1919 to 1932 confirmed this new model, especially with Ernest Rutherford's 1919 success in finally transmuting an atom of one substance into another and with James Chadwick's 1932 discovery of the elusive final basic particle of the atom, the neutron. From 1932 to 1938, scientists around the world learned a great deal more about atoms, primarily by bombarding the nuclei of atoms and using a variety of particle accelerators. In 1938, word came from Berlin of the most startling result of them all: the nucleus of an atom could actually be split in two, or "fissioned." This breakthrough was quickly confirmed in the United States and elsewhere. According to the theories of Albert Einstein, the fission of an atom should result in a release of energy. An "atomic bomb" was now no longer just science fiction -- it was a distinct possibility.

146

Manhattan Project: Fission Comes to America, 1939  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. FISSION COMES TO AMERICA Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. FISSION COMES TO AMERICA (1939) Events > Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939 A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 News of the fission experiments of Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann, and of the Meitner-Frisch calculations that confirmed them, spread rapidly. Meitner and Frisch communicated their results to Niels Bohr, who was in Copenhagen preparing to depart for the United States via Sweden and England. Bohr confirmed the validity of the findings while sailing to New York City, arriving on January 16, 1939. Ten days later Bohr, accompanied by Enrico Fermi, communicated the latest developments to some European émigré scientists who had preceded him to this country and to members of the American scientific community at the opening session of a conference on theoretical physics in Washington, D.C.

147

Manhattan Project: Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Solvay Physics Conference, Brussels, October 1933 ATOMIC BOMBARDMENT Solvay Physics Conference, Brussels, October 1933 ATOMIC BOMBARDMENT (1932-1938) Events > Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939 A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 M. Stanley Livingston and Ernest O. Lawrence in front of a 27-inch cyclotron, Rad Lab, University of California, Berkeley, 1934. In the 1930s, scientists learned a tremendous amount about the structure of the atom by bombarding it with sub-atomic particles. Ernest O. Lawrence's cyclotron, the Cockroft-Walton machine, and the Van de Graaff generator, developed by Robert J. Van de Graaff at Princeton University, were particle accelerators designed to bombard the nuclei of various elements to disintegrate atoms. Attempts of the early 1930s to split atoms, however, required huge amounts of energy because the first accelerators used proton beams and alpha particles as sources of energy. Since protons and alpha particles are positively charged, they Albert Einstein met substantial resistance from the positively charged target nucleus when they attempted to penetrate atoms. Even high-speed protons and alpha particles scored direct hits on a nucleus only approximately once in a million tries. Most simply passed by the target nucleus. Not surprisingly, Ernest Rutherford, Albert Einstein (right), and Niels Bohr regarded particle bombardment as useful in furthering knowledge of nuclear physics but believed it unlikely to meet public expectations of harnessing the power of the atom for practical purposes anytime in the near future. In a 1933 interview, Rutherford called such expectations "moonshine." Einstein compared particle bombardment with shooting in the dark at scarce birds, while Bohr, the Danish Nobel laureate, agreed that the chances of taming atomic energy were remote.

148

Manhattan Project: Enter the Army, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Army parade, Los Alamos ENTER THE ARMY Army parade, Los Alamos ENTER THE ARMY (1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 The decision to proceed with planning for the production of enriched uranium and of plutonium led directly to the involvement of the Army, specifically the Corps of Engineers. President Roosevelt had approved Army involvement on October 9, 1941, and Vannevar Bush had arranged for Army participation at S-1 meetings beginning in March 1942. The need for security suggested placing the S-1 program within one of the armed forces, and the construction expertise of the Corps of Engineers made it the logical choice to build the production facilities envisioned in the Conant report of May 23.

149

The Manhattan Project | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Fehner and Gosling, Origins of the Nevada Test Site Fehner and Gosling, Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing, 1951-1963. Battlefield of the Cold War: The Nevada Test Site,...

150

Manhattan Project | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

celebration of Y-12's 70th anniversary, a short film capturing highlights of the site's history now is available for viewing on the Y-12 public Web site at http:www.y12.doe.gov...

151

Solar For Schools: A Case Study in Identifying and Implementing Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Projects in Three California School Districts: Preprint  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy's (DOE) Solar America Showcase program seeks to accelerate demand for solar technologies among key end use market sectors. As part of this activity the DOE provides Technical Assistance through its national laboratories to large-scale, high-visibility solar installation projects. The Solar Schools Assessment and Implementation Project (SSAIP) in the San Francisco Bay area was selected for a 2009 DOE Solar American Showcase award. SSAIP was formed through the efforts of the nonprofit Sequoia Foundation and includes three school districts: Berkeley, West Contra Costa, and Oakland Unified School Districts. This paper summarizes the technical assistance efforts that resulted from this technical assistance support. It serves as a case study and reference document detailing the steps and processes that could be used to successfully identify, fund, and implement solar PV projects in school districts across the country.

Kandt, A.

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

A Platinum Anniversary for U.S. Atomic Heritage - EM's Historic Manhattan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

A Platinum Anniversary for U.S. Atomic Heritage - EM's Historic A Platinum Anniversary for U.S. Atomic Heritage - EM's Historic Manhattan Project Sites Gain International Media Attention A Platinum Anniversary for U.S. Atomic Heritage - EM's Historic Manhattan Project Sites Gain International Media Attention September 1, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - Traditionally, a platinum anniversary marks 70-years. The Manhattan roject legacy reached that special milestone this summer, highlighting a remarkable history nvolving the Oak Ridge and Hanford sites and Los Alamos National Laboratory. Bipartisan legislation making its way through Congress could commemorate America's atomic history by turning these sites into a national park, a prospect that continues to gain national and international media attention in print, online and on TV and

153

District of Columbia | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

28, 2012 28, 2012 Manhattan Project veteran Ralph Gates (far right) celebrates Christmas in 1945. Gates contributed to the Voices of the Manhattan Project, a storytelling project launched by the Atomic Heritage Foundation and Los Alamos Historical Society. Atomic Bombs, Winning the War and Women in Pants: Voices of the Manhattan Project Speak of the Nation's History WASHINGTON, D.C. - A year out of high school in 1944, Nashville native Colleen Black joined the Manhattan Project at the Oak Ridge site in Tennessee. Her parents and other family members were also working on the secretive project to help the war effort. November 26, 2012 Office of Science CFC Holiday Bake Sale Buy donated baked goods to support the CFC. November 26, 2012 OE Country Club Office Golf Play golf to benefit the CFC.

154

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Hidalgo County Irrigation District No. 1 (Edinburg) - North Branch / East Main - Final  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

TR-242 October 2003 Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Hidalgo County Irrigation District No. 1 (Edinburg) North Branch / East Main Final M. Edward Rister Ronald D. Lacewell Allen W. Sturdivant John R. C.... Robinson Michael C. Popp Texas Water Resources Institute Texas A&M University Authors Note: The original analysis reporting on the North Branch / East Main was contained in a two- component report (i.e., TR-205) which was published in November 2002...

Rister, M. Edward; Lacewell, Ronald D.; Sturdivant, Allen W.; Robinson, John R.C.; Popp, Michael C.

155

Manhattan, Kansas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Manhattan, Kansas: Energy Resources Manhattan, Kansas: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 39.1836082°, -96.5716694° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.1836082,"lon":-96.5716694,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

156

Hospital chilled water loop assessment Miami District Cooling Project: (Final report)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A strategy of linking primary chilled water plants at each hospital through a common underground distribution system was devised to minimize the capital cost for new centralized equipment while achieving the savings associated with district cooling systems. The study developed the technical and economic analyses and proposed a management structure to provide a mechanism for the equitable distribution of costs and savings.

Not Available

1989-08-08T23:59:59.000Z

157

Assessment of district heating/cooling potential for the Frenchman's Cove redevelopment project. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A study undertaken to evaluate the potential for district heating/cooling (DHC) in the City of Ecorse, Michigan is documented. the purpose of the study was to assess the concept of delivering energy from a centralized source (or several sources) through a piping network to many end users for heating domestic (tap) hot water, space heating, and space cooling. The primary focus of the study was the proposed redevelopment of eighty acres in Ecorse along the Detroit River waterfront known as Frenchman's Cove. As planned, the complete development would place nearly 2 million square feet of new, mixed use structures/facilities on the site and an eighteen acre undeveloped island located 300 feet offshore. Other areas of the city were also examined to identify and evaluate existing supply and end use possibilities. In addition, several neighboring communities were examined to determine the feasibility of downriver DHC network. Six large thermal energy producers identified in the study area include the Detroit Edison River Rouge power plant (DECo.-RR), the Wyandotte Municipal Services Commission (WMSC) power plant, a BASF/Wyandotte Corporation plant, a Marathon Oil refinery, the Great Lakes Steel complex, and the E.C. Levy Company slag processing site. Each was examined for potential as a thermal supplier on a district heating network.

Not Available

1982-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

Oregon's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Oregon. Oregon. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Oregon's 5th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Oregon's 5th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Oregon's 5th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Oregon's 5th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in Oregon's 5th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in Oregon's 5th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Oregon's 5th congressional district Central Lincoln People's Utility District Smart Grid Project Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Oregon's 5th congressional district Clean Edge Inc Registered Policy Organizations in Oregon's 5th congressional district

159

Revolving Loan Fund for Energy Efficiency Projects in School Districts and Political Subdivisions  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

[http://le.utah.gov/~2007/bills/hbillenr/hb0351.pdf HB 351], signed in 2007, created a $5 million revolving loan fund to provide zero-interest loans for energy efficiency projects in K-12 schools...

160

California's 27th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 27th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 27th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 27th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 27th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in California's 27th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 27th congressional district Burbank Water and Power Smart Grid Project Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 27th congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 27th congressional district

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: United Irrigation District of Hidalgo County (United) Rehabilitation of Main Canal, Laterals, and Diversion Pump Station Final  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of United Irrigation Districts Office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3 Detailed Location of United Irrigation Districts Office in Mission, TX . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 4 Illustrated Layout of United Irrigation District...-2003 . . . . . . . . . . 55 2 Historic Water Use (acre-feet) for United Irrigation District, 1999-2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 3 Selected Summary Information for United Irrigation District, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4 Data Summary for United Irrigation...

Rister, M. Edward; Lacewell, Ronald D.; Sturdivant, Allen W.

162

California's 29th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 29th congressional district 3 Registered Networking Organizations in California's 29th congressional district 4 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 29th congressional district 5 Registered Energy Companies in California's 29th congressional district 6 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 29th congressional district 7 Utility Companies in California's 29th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 29th congressional district Burbank Water and Power Smart Grid Project City of Glendale Water and Power Smart Grid Project Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 29th congressional

163

California's 32nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2nd congressional district 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 32nd congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 32nd congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 32nd congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 32nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 32nd congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Southern California Edison Company Smart Grid Demonstration Project Southern California Edison Company Smart Grid Demonstration Project (2) Registered Research Institutions in California's 32nd congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 32nd congressional district

164

Nebraska's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Nebraska. Nebraska. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Nebraska's 1st congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Nebraska's 1st congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Nebraska's 1st congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Nebraska's 1st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Nebraska's 1st congressional district Cuming County Public Power District Smart Grid Project Stanton County Public Power District Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Nebraska's 1st congressional district University of Nebraska-Lincoln and University of Florida (Building Energy Efficient Homes for America) Registered Energy Companies in Nebraska's 1st congressional district Axis Technologies Group Inc

165

North Carolina's 4th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4th congressional district 4th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in North Carolina's 4th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in North Carolina's 4th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in North Carolina's 4th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in North Carolina's 4th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in North Carolina's 4th congressional district Progress Energy Service Company, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in North Carolina's 4th congressional district N.C. Solar Center Registered Policy Organizations in North Carolina's 4th congressional district NC Sustainable Energy Association Registered Energy Companies in North Carolina's 4th congressional district

166

California's 46th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 46th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 46th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 46th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 46th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 46th congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 46th congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 46th congressional district Clean Tech Los Angeles Registered Energy Companies in California's 46th congressional district

167

California's 31st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1st congressional district 1st congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 31st congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 31st congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 31st congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 31st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 31st congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 31st congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 31st congressional district Clean Tech Los Angeles Registered Energy Companies in California's 31st congressional district

168

California's 35th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 35th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 35th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 35th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 35th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 35th congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 35th congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 35th congressional district Clean Tech Los Angeles Registered Energy Companies in California's 35th congressional district

169

California's 36th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 36th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 36th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 36th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 36th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 36th congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 36th congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 36th congressional district Clean Tech Los Angeles Registered Energy Companies in California's 36th congressional district

170

California's 25th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 25th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 25th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 25th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 25th congressional district 6 Energy Generation Facilities in California's 25th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 25th congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 25th congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 25th congressional district

171

California's 39th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 39th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 39th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 39th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 39th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 39th congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 39th congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 39th congressional district Clean Tech Los Angeles Registered Energy Companies in California's 39th congressional district

172

California's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

district district 2 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 5th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in California's 5th congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in California's 5th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in California's 5th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 5th congressional district Sacramento Municipal Utility District Smart Grid Project Registered Policy Organizations in California's 5th congressional district California Energy Commission Registered Energy Companies in California's 5th congressional district Aerojet American Energy Power Systems Inc AEPS Anuvu Inc Ardent Energy Group Inc Atlantis Energy Systems Inc Aztec Solar California State Assembly Clean Energy Systems

173

California's 34th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4th congressional district 4th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 34th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 34th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 34th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 34th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 34th congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 34th congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 34th congressional district Clean Tech Los Angeles Registered Energy Companies in California's 34th congressional district

174

California's 33rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3rd congressional district 3rd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 33rd congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 33rd congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 33rd congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 33rd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 33rd congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 33rd congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 33rd congressional district Clean Tech Los Angeles Registered Energy Companies in California's 33rd congressional district

175

California's 37th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 37th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 37th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 37th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 37th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 37th congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 37th congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 37th congressional district Clean Tech Los Angeles Registered Energy Companies in California's 37th congressional district

176

ELECTRICAL DISTRICT No.  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL DISTRICT No. 4 PINAL COUNTY POST OFFICE BOX 605- ELOY, ARIZONA 85131 Telephone: (520) 468-7338 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: DISTRICT MANAGER: MARK HAMILTON, CHAIRMAN RON McEACHERN CHARLES BUSH ThOMAS W. SCM JAMES F. SHEDD WILLIAM WARREN VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO: DSWFPP~2wapa.gov July 19, 2010 Mr. Darrick Moe Desert Southwest Regional Manager Western Area Power Authority P.O. Box 6457 Phoenix, AZ 85005-6457 Re: SPPR Proposed ED5 to Palo Verde Transmission Project Electrical District Number Four of Pinal County ("ED4") and Electrical District Number Five of Pinal County ("ED5") are members of the Southwest Public Power Resource ("SPPR") Group and support the ED5 to Palo Verde Project Statement of Interest ("SOT") submitted by the SPPR Group. ED4 is also a participant in the Southeast Valley C'SEV") Project and has offered to

177

California's 50th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

California. California. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 50th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 50th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 50th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 50th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 50th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in California's 50th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 50th congressional district San Diego Gas and Electric Company Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 50th congressional district EcoElectron Ventures Inc Global Energy Network Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 50th congressional district

178

Washington's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Contents Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 5th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 5th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 5th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 5th congressional district Avista Utilities Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 5th congressional district Washington State University Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district Itron ReliOn Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 5th congressional district Kettle Falls Biomass Facility

179

California's 53rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

This page represents a congressional district in California. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 53rd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 53rd congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 53rd congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 53rd congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 53rd congressional district 6 Utility Companies in California's 53rd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 53rd congressional district San Diego Gas and Electric Company Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 53rd congressional district Global Energy Network Institute

180

California's 51st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

California. California. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 51st congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 51st congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 51st congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 51st congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 51st congressional district 6 Energy Generation Facilities in California's 51st congressional district 7 Utility Companies in California's 51st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 51st congressional district San Diego Gas and Electric Company Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 51st congressional district

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

California's 52nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

California. California. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 52nd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 52nd congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 52nd congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 52nd congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 52nd congressional district 6 Utility Companies in California's 52nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 52nd congressional district San Diego Gas and Electric Company Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 52nd congressional district Global Energy Network Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 52nd congressional district

182

Oregon's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Oregon. Oregon. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Oregon's 3rd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Oregon's 3rd congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Oregon's 3rd congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Oregon's 3rd congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in Oregon's 3rd congressional district 6 Utility Companies in Oregon's 3rd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Oregon's 3rd congressional district Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Oregon's 3rd congressional district Clean Edge Inc Registered Policy Organizations in Oregon's 3rd congressional district Bonneville Environmental Foundation

183

Manhattan Project: Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Ernest Rutherford (and James Chadwick, on the far right) EXPLORING THE ATOM Ernest Rutherford (and James Chadwick, on the far right) EXPLORING THE ATOM (1919-1932) Events > Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939 A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 The road to the atomic bomb began in earnest in 1919 with the first artificial transmutation of an element. The New Zealander Ernest Rutherford, working in the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge University in England, changed several atoms of nitrogen into oxygen. The final addition to the atomic "miniature solar system" first proposed by Niels Bohr came in 1932 when James Chadwick, Rutherford's colleague at Cambridge, identified the third and final basic particle of the atom: the neutron.

184

Manhattan Project: "Met Lab" Alumni  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Resources Resources About this Site How to Navigate this Site Library Maps Note on Sources Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know Photo Gallery Site Map Sources and Notes Suggested Readings "MET LAB" ALUMNI University of Chicago (December 2, 1946) Resources > Photo Gallery Met Lab alumni pose at the University of Chicago, December 2, 1946. Alumni of the Met Lab pose on the steps of Eckhart Hall on the campus of the University of Chicago on December 2, 1946 (the fourth anniversary of CP-1 first going critical). Front row, left to right: Enrico Fermi, Walter Zinn, Albert Wattenberg, and Herbert Anderson. Middle row, left to right: Harold Agnew, William Sturm, Harold Lichtenberger, Leona W. Marshall, and Leo Szilard. Back row, left to right: Norman Hilberry, Samuel Allison, Thomas Brill, Robert Nobles, Warren Nyer, and Marvin Wilkening.

185

Manhattan Project: Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Enrico Fermi PILES AND PLUTONIUM Enrico Fermi PILES AND PLUTONIUM (1939-1942) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 The Uranium Committee's first report, issued on November 1, 1939, recommended that, despite the uncertainty of success, the government should immediately obtain four tons of graphite and fifty tons of uranium oxide. This recommendation led to the first outlay of government funds -- $6,000 in February 1940 -- and reflected the importance attached to the Fermi-Szilard pile (reactor) experiments already underway at Columbia University. Building upon the Fission chain reaction work performed in 1934 demonstrating the value of moderators in producing slow neutrons, Enrico Fermi thought that a mixture of the right moderator and natural uranium could produce a self-sustaining fission chain reaction. Fermi and Leo Szilard increasingly focused their attention on carbon in the form of graphite. Perhaps graphite could slow down, or moderate, the neutrons coming from the fission reaction, increasing the probability of their causing additional fissions in sustaining the chain reaction. A pile containing a large amount of natural uranium could then produce enough secondary neutrons to keep a reaction going.

186

Manhattan Project: A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

John Joseph Thomson A MINIATURE SOLAR SYSTEM John Joseph Thomson A MINIATURE SOLAR SYSTEM (1890s-1919) Events > Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939 A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 The modern effort to uncover the inner structure of the atom began with the discovery of the electron by the English physicist J. J. Thomson (above) in 1897. Thomson proved that cathode rays were not some sort of undefined process occurring in "ether" but were in fact composed of extremely small, negatively charged particles. Dubbed electrons, their exact charge and mass were soon determined by John Townsend and Robert Millikan. Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. At the same time, discoveries relating to the curious phenomenon of radioactivity had also begun to propel atomic research forward. In 1896, the French physicist Antoine Becquerel detected the three basic forms of radioactivity, which were soon named alpha, beta, and gamma by Ernest Rutherford, a student of Thomson from New Zealand. Also in 1896, the husband-and-wife team of Marie and Pierre Curie began work in Paris on the emission of radiation by uranium and thorium. The Curies soon announced their discoveries of radium and polonium; they also proved that beta particles were negatively charged. In 1900, Becquerel realized that beta particles and electrons were the same things.

187

Manhattan Project: Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

REORGANIZATION AND ACCELERATION REORGANIZATION AND ACCELERATION (1940-1941) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 Ernest Lawrence, 1935 During 1939 and 1940, most of the work done on uranium isotope separation and the chain reaction pile was performed in university laboratories by academic scientists funded primarily by private foundations. Although the federal government began supporting uranium research in 1940, the pace appeared too leisurely to the scientific community and failed to convince scientists that their work was of high priority. Certainly few were more inclined to this view than Ernest O. Lawrence (right), director of the Radiation Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley. Lawrence was among those who thought that it was merely a matter of time before the United States was drawn into World War II, and he wanted the government to mobilize its scientific forces as rapidly as possible.

188

Manhattan Project: Production Reactor (Pile) Design, Met Lab, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Schematic of the X-10 Graphite Reactor, Oak Ridge PRODUCTION REACTOR (PILE) DESIGN Schematic of the X-10 Graphite Reactor, Oak Ridge PRODUCTION REACTOR (PILE) DESIGN (Met Lab, 1942) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 By 1942, scientists had established that some of the uranium exposed to radioactivity in a reactor (pile) would eventually decay into plutonium, which could then be separated by chemical means from the uranium. Important theoretical research on this was ongoing, but the work was scattered at various universities from coast to coast. In early 1942, Arthur Compton arranged for all pile research to be moved to the Met Lab at the University of Chicago.

189

Manhattan Project: Order to Drop the Atomic Bomb  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

ORDER TO DROP THE ATOMIC BOMB Handy to Spaatz, National Archives (July 25, 1945) Resources > Library The document below is the order to attack Japanese cities with atomic bombs. In it, the Acting Army Chief of Staff, Thomas Handy, orders Commanding General Carl Spaatz, Army Strategic Air Forces, to "deliver [the] first special bomb as soon as weather will permit . . . after about 3 August 1945." The target list: "Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata, and Nagasaki." Further attacks were also authorized: "additional bombs will be delivered on the above targets as soon as made ready." Handy was the acting chief of staff because George Marshall was with President Harry S. Truman at the Potsdam Conference. The letter explicitly notes that this order was approved by Marshall and Secretary of War Henry Stimson. Truman, of course, provided the ultimate authorization for dropping the bomb.

190

Manhattan Project: "Rad Lab" Staff  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

"RAD LAB" STAFF "RAD LAB" STAFF University of California, Berkeley (1939) Resources > Photo Gallery Rad Lab Staff, 1939 Lawrence Radiation Laboratory caption: "Early Radiation Laboratory staff framed by the magnet for 60-inch cyclotron in 1939. Front row, left to right: John H. Lawrence, Robert Serber, Franz N. D. Kurie, Raymond T. Birge, Ernest O. Lawrence, Donald Cooksey, Arthur H. Snell, Luis W. Alvarez, Philip H. Abelson. Second Row: John Backus, Wilfred B. Mann, Paul C. Aebersold, Edwin M. McMillan, Ernest Lyman, Martin D. Kamen, D. C. Kalbfell, W. W. Salisbury. Last row: Alex S. Langsdorf, Jr., Sam Simmons, Joseph G. Hamilton, David H. Sloan, J. Robert Oppenheimer, William Brobeck, Robert Cornog, Robert R. Wilson, Eugene Viez, J. J. Livingood."

191

Manhattan Project: Y-12: Design, 1942-1943  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Ernest Lawrence slumps in his chair from fatigue in front of a cyclotron control panel while conducting calutron-related experiments, Berkeley, 1943. Y-12: DESIGN Ernest Lawrence slumps in his chair from fatigue in front of a cyclotron control panel while conducting calutron-related experiments, Berkeley, 1943. Y-12: DESIGN (Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1942-1943) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 Although the Lewis Report had placed gaseous diffusion ahead of the electromagnetic approach, many were still betting in early 1943 that Ernest Lawrence (right) and his "calutron" would eventually predominate. Lawrence and his laboratory of mechanics at the University of California, Berkeley, continued to experiment with the giant 184-inch cyclotron magnet, trying to reach a consensus on which shims, sources, and Electromagnetic method for the enrichment of uranium collectors to incorporate into the Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant that was to be built at Oak Ridge. Research on magnet size and placement and beam resolution led Lawrence and his group in fall 1942 to propose an arrangement of huge electromagnetic coils connected by a bus bar in an oval racetrack configuration, as seen from above. Forty-eight gaps in the racetrack between the coils would each contain two vacuum tanks. With two racetracks per building, ten buildings would be necessary to provide the estimated 2,000 sources and collectors needed to separate 100 grams of uranium-235 daily. The Berkeley researchers hoped that improvements in calutron design, or placing multiple sources and collectors in each tank, might increase efficiency and reduce the number of tanks and buildings required, but experimental results were inconclusive even as Stone & Webster of Boston, the Y-12 contractor at Oak Ridge, prepared to break ground.

192

Manhattan Project: The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn, Kaiser-Wilhelm Institute, Berlin THE DISCOVERY OF FISSION Berlin, Germany (1938-1939) Events > Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939 A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 The English word "atom" derives from the Greek word "atomon" ("ατομον"), which means "that which cannot be divided." In 1938, the scientific community proved the Greek philosophers wrong by dividing the atom. Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. Fission, the basis of the atomic bomb, was discovered in Nazi Germany less than a year before the beginning of the Second World War. It was December 1938 when the radiochemists Otto Hahn (above, with Lise Meitner) and Fritz Strassmann, while bombarding elements with neutrons in their Berlin laboratory, made their unexpected discovery. They found that while the nuclei of most elements changed somewhat during neutron bombardment, uranium nuclei changed greatly and broke into two roughly equal pieces. They split and became not the new transuranic elements that some thought Enrico Fermi had discovered but radioactive barium isotopes (barium has the atomic number 56) and other fragments of the uranium itself. The substances Fermi had created in his experiments, that is, did more than resemble lighter elements -- they were lighter elements. The products of the Hahn-Strassmann experiment weighed less than that of the original uranium nucleus, and herein lay the primary significance of their findings. It folIowed from Albert Einstein's E=mc2 equation that the loss of mass resulting from the splitting process must have been converted into energy in the form of kinetic energy that could in turn be converted into heat.

193

Manhattan Project: Y-12 Operation, 1943-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Alpha Racetrack, Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant, Oak Ridge Y-12: OPERATION Alpha Racetrack, Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant, Oak Ridge Y-12: OPERATION (Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1943-1944) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 During the summer and fall of 1943, the Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant at Oak Ridge began to take shape. The huge buildings to house the operating equipment were readied as manufacturers began delivering everything from electrical switches to motors, valves, and tanks. While construction and outfitting proceeded, almost 5,000 operating and maintenance personnel were hired and trained. Then, between October and mid-December, Y-12 paid the price for being a new technology that had not been put through its paces in a pilot plant. Vacuum tanks in the first Alpha racetrack leaked and shimmied out of line due to magnetic pressure, welds failed, electrical circuits malfunctioned, and operators made frequent mistakes. Most seriously, the magnet coils shorted out because of rust and sediment in the cooling oil.

194

Manhattan Project: San Ildefonso Pueblo Party</FONT>  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SAN ILDEFONSO PUEBLO PARTY SAN ILDEFONSO PUEBLO PARTY Los Alamos (December 1945) Resources > Photo Gallery San Ildefonso Pueblo party, December 1945 A special 1995 issue of the monthly publication of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, "Dateline: Los Alamos," described the party this way: "On a cold December night in 1945, the San Ildefonso Pueblo, a tribe of Native Americans living next to Los Alamos, invited a group of Los Alamos square dancers to their pueblo for an evening of fun and entertainment. The two communities had seen a lot of each other during the war as men and women from the pueblo commuted daily to work at Los Alamos. The association produced a cross fertilization of cultures. "Bernice Brode wrote: 'Some of us had more Indian crafts in our Army apartments than the Indians had in their homes, (and) modern American conveniences such as refrigerators and linoleum began cropping up in the pueblo.' At the dance, the Indians performed for the square dancers and the square dancers performed for the Indians. After the demonstrations, members from the two groups began dancing with each other. Charlie Masters, a teacher at the Los Alamos school, wrote: 'This fiesta-hoedown I like to remember as the climax of our relations with the natives.'

195

Manhattan Project: Early Government Support, 1939-1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard EARLY GOVERNMENT SUPPORT Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard EARLY GOVERNMENT SUPPORT (1939-1942) Events Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 As the news of the fission breakthrough spread from Berlin in early 1939, many physicists within the United States (and elsewhere) immediately realized the potential danger posed by atomic energy. Especially concerned were émigré physicists who had fled their native countries because of the expansion of Nazi Germany and sought to obtain governmental support for further, secret nuclear research. Convincing busy government officials of the seriousness of this esoteric new scientific development was at first slow going. One month before the Second World War formally began with the September 1, 1939, invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany, Leo Szilard enlisted the help of Albert Einstein in personally calling President Franklin Roosevelt's attention to the matter. Roosevelt responded by creating a government committee to coordinate and provide modest funding for early uranium research. Work also proceeded during this period on the design of an atomic pile that could demonstrate the potential of atomic energy and possibly provide a second path to the atomic bomb besides uranium.

196

Manhattan Project: Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Ernest Lawrence, Arthur Compton, Vannevar Bush, and James Conant discuss uranium research, Berkeley, March 29, 1940. EARLY URANIUM RESEARCH Ernest Lawrence, Arthur Compton, Vannevar Bush, and James Conant discuss uranium research, Berkeley, March 29, 1940. EARLY URANIUM RESEARCH (1939-1941) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 President Franklin D. Roosevelt responded to the call for government support of uranium research quickly but cautiously. He appointed Lyman J. Briggs, director of the National Bureau of Standards, head of the Advisory Committee on Uranium, which met for the first time on October 21, 1939. The committee, including both civilian and military representation, was to coordinate its activities with Alexander Sachs and look into the current state of research on uranium to recommend an appropriate role for the federal government. In early 1940, only months after the outbreak of war in Europe, the Uranium Committee recommended that the government fund limited research on isotope separation as well as Enrico Fermi's and Leo Szilard's work on fission chain reactions at Columbia University (below).

197

Manhattan Project truck unearthed at landfill cleanup site  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

truck we found was used for," said Bruce Schappell, LANL's deputy associate director for Environmental Programs. "It's in pretty bad shape." The truck will be crushed, packaged...

198

Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

truck we found was used for," said Bruce Schappell, LANL's deputy associate director for Environmental Programs. "It's in pretty bad shape." The truck will be crushed, packaged...

199

Work of Manhattan Project-era photographer Ed Westcott lives...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Media Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Video Gallery Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home NNSA Blog Work...

200

Susanville District Heating District Heating Low Temperature...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Susanville District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Susanville District Heating District Heating Low Temperature...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Texas's 22nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Texas. Texas. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 22nd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 22nd congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 22nd congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Texas's 22nd congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Texas's 22nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 22nd congressional district CenterPoint Energy Smart Grid Project Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 22nd congressional district Institute for Energy Research Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 22nd congressional district Air and Liquid Advisors ALA American Electric Technologies Inc

202

Massachusetts's 9th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9th congressional district: Energy Resources 9th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Massachusetts. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Massachusetts's 9th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Massachusetts's 9th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Massachusetts's 9th congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Massachusetts's 9th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Massachusetts's 9th congressional district NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation Smart Grid Demonstration Project NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation Smart Grid Demonstration Project

203

Virginia's 8th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Virginia's 8th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Virginia's 8th congressional district 2 Registered Policy Organizations in Virginia's 8th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Virginia's 8th congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Virginia's 8th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Virginia's 8th congressional district National Rural Electric Cooperative Association Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Policy Organizations in Virginia's 8th congressional district Bordeaux International Energy Consulting, LLC Conservation International Millennium Institute The Nature Conservancy Tropical Forest Foundation Registered Energy Companies in Virginia's 8th congressional district AES Corporation AES Solar

204

BSU GHP District Heating and Cooling System (Phase I) | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

BSU GHP District Heating and Cooling System (Phase I) BSU GHP District Heating and Cooling System (Phase I) Project objectives: Create a campus geothermal heating and cooling...

205

Iowa's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Iowa's 3rd congressional district Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Iowa's 3rd congressional district AgraGate Carbon...

206

California's 30th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

0th congressional district 0th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 30th congressional district 3 Registered Networking Organizations in California's 30th congressional district 4 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 30th congressional district 5 Registered Energy Companies in California's 30th congressional district 6 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 30th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 30th congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 30th congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Networking Organizations in California's 30th congressional

207

Pennsylvania's 15th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district th congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 15th congressional district 3 Registered Financial Organizations in Pennsylvania's 15th congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Pennsylvania's 15th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Pennsylvania's 15th congressional district PPL Electric Utilities Corp. Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 15th congressional district Air Products Chemicals Inc Akrion Inc Minerals Technologies PPL Energy Services Holdings LLC PPL EnergyPlus LLC PPT Research Inc Protium Energy Technologies Registered Financial Organizations in Pennsylvania's 15th congressional district Sustainable Energy Fund of Central Eastern Pennsylvania Utility Companies in Pennsylvania's 15th congressional district

208

North Carolina's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2nd congressional district 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in North Carolina's 2nd congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in North Carolina's 2nd congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in North Carolina's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in North Carolina's 2nd congressional district Progress Energy Service Company, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in North Carolina's 2nd congressional district N.C. Solar Center Registered Policy Organizations in North Carolina's 2nd congressional district NC Sustainable Energy Association Registered Energy Companies in North Carolina's 2nd congressional district Advanced Vehicle Research Center of North Carolina Agri Ethanol Products LLC AEPNC

209

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Brownsville Irrigation District 72" and 48" Pipeline Replacing Main Canal Final  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, if applicable. 6 Note the pipeline - leak repair expense is not included in determining O&M costs for the first two years as the contractors warranty is expected to cover any extraordinary repair-type expense (Holdar). 7 On average, the District diverts water..., if applicable. 6 Note the pipeline - leak repair expense is not included in determining O&M costs for the first two years as the contractors warranty is expected to cover any extraordinary repair-type expense (Holdar). 7 On average, the District diverts water...

Rister, M. Edward; Lacewell, Ronald D.; Sturdivant, Allen W.; Robinson, John R.C.; Popp, Michael C.

210

Illinois' 6th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Illinois. Illinois. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Illinois' 6th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Illinois' 6th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Illinois' 6th congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Illinois' 6th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Illinois' 6th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Illinois' 6th congressional district City of Naperville, Illinois Smart Grid Project Registered Networking Organizations in Illinois' 6th congressional district Chicago Clean Energy Alliance Registered Energy Companies in Illinois' 6th congressional district Acciona Wind Energy USA LLC Aerotecture International Inc American Bar Association Section on Environment

211

California's 28th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Contents Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 28th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 28th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 28th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 28th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 28th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 28th congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 28th congressional district University of Southern California-Energy Institute Registered Policy Organizations in California's 28th congressional district Clean Tech Los Angeles

212

Manhattan Beach, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Manhattan Beach, California: Energy Resources Manhattan Beach, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 33.8847361°, -118.4109089° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":33.8847361,"lon":-118.4109089,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

213

SUMMARY of the PORTLAND DISTRICT VE STUDIES related to Fish Activities CENWP Status of Participants in the study Days to Cost for only Net Project Project  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Participants in the study Days to Cost for only Net Project Project VE ID # Description of the Study Contract

214

California's 14th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4th congressional district 4th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in California's 14th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 14th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 14th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 14th congressional district 6 Energy Incentives for California's 14th congressional district Registered Research Institutions in California's 14th congressional district Environmental Business Cluster Global Climate and Energy Project Google.org Stanford - Woods Institute for the Environment Stanford- Global Climate and Energy Project Stanford- Precourt Energy Efficiency Center Technology Ventures Corporation Registered Networking Organizations in California's 14th congressional

215

California's 9th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

district district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 9th congressional district 3 Registered Networking Organizations in California's 9th congressional district 4 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 9th congressional district 5 Registered Energy Companies in California's 9th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 9th congressional district Seeo, Inc Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in California's 9th congressional district Energy BioSciences Institute Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) UC Berkeley- Energy Institute UC Berkeley-Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory UC Berkeley-Transportation Sustainability Research Center UC Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of

216

District of Columbia | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2012 4, 2012 Curiosity, left, at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, in late November 2011. Shown here is the flight hardware that was being assembled prior to shipment to Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida for the launch. | Photo Credit Dr. Robert C. Nelson Environmental Management Scientist Sets His Sights on Mars An Energy Department scientist helped assemble Curiosity, the most recent Mars rover. September 1, 2012 A Platinum Anniversary for U.S. Atomic Heritage - EM's Historic Manhattan Project Sites Gain International Media Attention WASHINGTON, D.C. - Traditionally, a platinum anniversary marks 70-years. The Manhattan Project legacy reached that special milestone this summer, highlighting a remarkable history involving the Oak Ridge and Hanford sites

217

Drainage, Sanitation, and Public Facilities Districts (Virginia) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Drainage, Sanitation, and Public Facilities Districts (Virginia) Drainage, Sanitation, and Public Facilities Districts (Virginia) Drainage, Sanitation, and Public Facilities Districts (Virginia) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Developer Industrial Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Municipal/Public Utility Rural Electric Cooperative Systems Integrator Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Water Buying & Making Electricity Home Weatherization Program Info State Virginia Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Local Governments and Districts This legislation provides for the establishment of sanitary, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities districts in Virginia. Designated districts are public bodies, and have the authority to regulate the construction and development of sanitation and waste disposal projects in their

218

Idaho's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Idaho's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Idaho's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Idaho. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Idaho's 1st congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Idaho's 1st congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Idaho's 1st congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in Idaho's 1st congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Idaho's 1st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Idaho's 1st congressional district Idaho Power Company Smart Grid Project M2M Communications Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Idaho's 1st congressional district

219

Texas's 18th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

8th congressional district: Energy Resources 8th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Texas. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 18th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 18th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 18th congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Texas's 18th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Texas's 18th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 18th congressional district CenterPoint Energy Smart Grid Project Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 18th congressional district

220

Texas's 9th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9th congressional district: Energy Resources 9th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Texas. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 9th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 9th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 9th congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Texas's 9th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Texas's 9th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 9th congressional district CenterPoint Energy Smart Grid Project Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 9th congressional district

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Arizona's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Arizona's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources Arizona's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Arizona. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Arizona's 5th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Arizona's 5th congressional district 3 Registered Networking Organizations in Arizona's 5th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Arizona's 5th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Arizona's 5th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Arizona's 5th congressional district Salt River Project Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Arizona's 5th congressional district

222

Florida's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3rd congressional district: Energy Resources 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Florida. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Florida's 3rd congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Florida's 3rd congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Florida's 3rd congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in Florida's 3rd congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Florida's 3rd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Florida's 3rd congressional district Intellon Corporation Smart Grid Project JEA Smart Grid Project Registered Networking Organizations in Florida's 3rd congressional district

223

Texas's 14th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district: Energy Resources th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Texas. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 14th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 14th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Texas's 14th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 14th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in Texas's 14th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in Texas's 14th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 14th congressional district CenterPoint Energy Smart Grid Project Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC Smart Grid Project

224

Texas's 29th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9th congressional district: Energy Resources 9th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Texas. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 29th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 29th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 29th congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Texas's 29th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Texas's 29th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 29th congressional district CenterPoint Energy Smart Grid Project Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 29th congressional district

225

California's 21st congressional district: Energy Resources |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

California's 21st congressional district Dinuba Biomass Facility Fresno Biomass Facility Sun Harvest Solar Project Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleCalifornia...

226

California's 20th congressional district: Energy Resources |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

district Delano Biomass Facility Fresno Biomass Facility Mendota Biomass Facility Sun Harvest Solar Project Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleCalifornia...

227

California's 19th congressional district: Energy Resources |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Facility Fresno Biomass Facility Madera Biomass Facility SPI Sonora Biomass Facility Sun Harvest Solar Project Utility Companies in California's 19th congressional district...

228

Texas's 21st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Texas. Texas. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 21st congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 21st congressional district 3 Registered Networking Organizations in Texas's 21st congressional district 4 Registered Policy Organizations in Texas's 21st congressional district 5 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 21st congressional district 6 Registered Financial Organizations in Texas's 21st congressional district 7 Utility Companies in Texas's 21st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 21st congressional district Center for the Commercialization of Electric Technologies Smart Grid Demonstration Project Pecan Street Project, Inc. Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 21st congressional district

229

Texas's 25th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Contents Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 25th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 25th congressional district 3 Registered Networking Organizations in Texas's 25th congressional district 4 Registered Policy Organizations in Texas's 25th congressional district 5 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 25th congressional district 6 Registered Financial Organizations in Texas's 25th congressional district 7 Utility Companies in Texas's 25th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 25th congressional district Center for the Commercialization of Electric Technologies Smart Grid Demonstration Project Pecan Street Project, Inc. Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 25th congressional district

230

Texas's 10th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district: Energy Resources th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Texas. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 10th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 10th congressional district 3 Registered Networking Organizations in Texas's 10th congressional district 4 Registered Policy Organizations in Texas's 10th congressional district 5 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 10th congressional district 6 Registered Financial Organizations in Texas's 10th congressional district 7 Utility Companies in Texas's 10th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 10th congressional district

231

Colorado's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3rd congressional district 3rd congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Colorado's 3rd congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Colorado's 3rd congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Colorado's 3rd congressional district 5 Energy Incentives for Colorado's 3rd congressional district 6 Utility Companies in Colorado's 3rd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Colorado's 3rd congressional district Black Hills/Colorado Electric Utility Co. Smart Grid Project Registered Networking Organizations in Colorado's 3rd congressional district Haiti Repowered Peak Oil Awareness Network Peak Oil Food Network Registered Policy Organizations in Colorado's 3rd congressional district Sustainability Center of the Rockies Registered Energy Companies in Colorado's 3rd congressional district

232

Colorado's 4th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4th congressional district 4th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Colorado's 4th congressional district 3 Registered Networking Organizations in Colorado's 4th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Colorado's 4th congressional district 5 Energy Incentives for Colorado's 4th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in Colorado's 4th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Colorado's 4th congressional district City of Fort Collins Utilities Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Colorado's 4th congressional district CSU - Institute for the Built Environment Renewable Energy Tech School Registered Networking Organizations in Colorado's 4th congressional district Northern Colorado Clean Cities Registered Energy Companies in Colorado's 4th congressional district

233

Ohio's 7th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7th congressional district: Energy Resources 7th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Ohio. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Ohio's 7th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Ohio's 7th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Ohio's 7th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Ohio's 7th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Ohio's 7th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Ohio's 7th congressional district Columbus Southern Power Company (doing business as AEP Ohio) Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Networking Organizations in Ohio's 7th congressional district

234

Oregon's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Oregon's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Oregon's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Oregon. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Oregon's 1st congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Oregon's 1st congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Oregon's 1st congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Oregon's 1st congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in Oregon's 1st congressional district 6 Utility Companies in Oregon's 1st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Oregon's 1st congressional district Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative Smart Grid Project

235

Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district 3 Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 2nd congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 2nd congressional district Snohomish County Public Utilities District Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district Mercurius Biofuels LLC

236

Tennessee's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tennessee's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Tennessee's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Tennessee. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Tennessee's 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Tennessee's 2nd congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Tennessee's 2nd congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Tennessee's 2nd congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Tennessee's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Tennessee's 2nd congressional district Knoxville Utilities Board Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Tennessee's 2nd congressional district

237

Washington's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1st congressional district: Energy Resources 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 1st congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 1st congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Washington's 1st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 1st congressional district Snohomish County Public Utilities District Smart Grid Project Registered Networking Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional

238

Ohio's 15th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

5th congressional district: Energy Resources 5th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Ohio. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Ohio's 15th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Ohio's 15th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Ohio's 15th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Ohio's 15th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Ohio's 15th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Ohio's 15th congressional district Columbus Southern Power Company (doing business as AEP Ohio) Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Networking Organizations in Ohio's 15th congressional district

239

Texas's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Texas's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources Texas's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Texas. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 13th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 13th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 13th congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Texas's 13th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 13th congressional district Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 13th congressional district Alternative Energy Institute Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 13th congressional district

240

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Cameron County Irrigation District No. 2 (San Benito) - Infrastructure Rehabilitation - Final  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Reclamation (BOR). The proposed project involves rehabilitating 42+ miles of canals, laterals, and pipelines. Both nominal and real estimates of water and energy savings and expected economic and financial costs of those savings are identified throughout...

Rister, M. Edward; Lacewell, Ronald D.; Sturdivant, Allen W.; Robinson, John R.; Popp, Michael C.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Cameron County Irrigation District No. 2 (San Benito) Infrastructure Rehabilitation Preliminary  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Reclamation (BOR). The proposed project involves rehabilitating 42+ miles of canals, laterals, and pipelines. Both nominal and real estimates of water and energy savings and expected economic and financial costs of those savings are identified throughout...

Rister, M. Edward; Lacewell, Ronald D.; Sturdivant, Allen W.; Robinson, John R.C.; Popp, Michael C.

242

Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Wisconsin. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district Madison Gas and Electric Company Smart Grid Project Wisconsin Power and Light Company Smart Grid Project

243

New Mexico's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Mexico's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Mexico's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in New Mexico. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New Mexico's 1st congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New Mexico's 1st congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in New Mexico's 1st congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in New Mexico's 1st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New Mexico's 1st congressional district Ktech Corporation Smart Grid Demonstration Project Public Service Company of New Mexico Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in New Mexico's 1st congressional district

244

Ohio's 12th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2th congressional district: Energy Resources 2th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Ohio. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Ohio's 12th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Ohio's 12th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Ohio's 12th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Ohio's 12th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Ohio's 12th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Ohio's 12th congressional district City of Westerville, OH Smart Grid Project Columbus Southern Power Company (doing business as AEP Ohio) Smart Grid Demonstration Project

245

Massachusetts's 6th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

6th congressional district: Energy Resources 6th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Massachusetts. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Massachusetts's 6th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Massachusetts's 6th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Massachusetts's 6th congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Massachusetts's 6th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Massachusetts's 6th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Massachusetts's 6th congressional district Honeywell International, Inc Smart Grid Project Marblehead Municipal Light Department Smart Grid Project

246

Idaho's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2nd congressional district: Energy Resources 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Idaho. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Idaho's 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Idaho's 2nd congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Idaho's 2nd congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Idaho's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Idaho's 2nd congressional district Idaho Power Company Smart Grid Project M2M Communications Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Idaho's 2nd congressional district Boise State University, CAES Energy Efficiency Research Institute

247

Cedarville School District Retrofit of Heating and Cooling Systems...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Last modified on July 22, 2011. Project Title Cedarville School District Retrofit of Heating and Cooling Systems with Geothermal Heat Pumps and Ground Source Water Loops Project...

248

Pennsylvania's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Pennsylvania's 1st congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 1st congressional district 3 Registered Financial Organizations in Pennsylvania's 1st congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Pennsylvania's 1st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Pennsylvania's 1st congressional district PECO Energy Company Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 1st congressional district Advanced Renewables LLC Aircuity Inc AlumiFuel Power Inc Biofuel Advanced Research and Development LLC BARD BlackGold Biofuels Blue Hill Investment Partners LLC CDI Corporation Chameleon Optics Inc Clean Markets Energy Cooperative Association of Pennsylvania

249

PAD District  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

District District and State Production Capacity Alkylates Aromatics Asphalt and Road Oil Isomers Lubricants Marketable Petroleum Coke Sulfur (short tons/day) Hydrogen (MMcfd) Table 2. Production Capacity of Operable Petroleum Refineries by PAD District and State as of January 1, 2013 (Barrels per Stream Day, Except Where Noted) a 91,429 10,111 26,500 110,165 21,045 21,120 74 1,127 PAD District I Delaware 11,729 5,191 0 6,000 0 13,620 40 596 Georgia 0 0 24,000 0 0 0 0 0 New Jersey 37,200 0 63,500 4,000 12,000 7,500 31 290 Pennsylvania 42,500 4,920 22,065 16,500 2,945 0 0 240 West Virginia 0 0 600 0 6,100 0 3 1 268,106 95,300 159,000 260,414 9,100 158,868 584 7,104 PAD District II Illinois 83,900 19,900 38,100 16,000 0 70,495 202 2,397 Indiana 27,200 16,800 33,700 27,100 0 10,000 0 653

250

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Hidalgo County Irrigation District No. 1 (Edinburg) - Curry Main - Final  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

American Development Bank. The proposed project involves installing 1 mile of 72" pipeline to replace a segment of the Curry Main canal. Both nominal and real estimates of water and energy savings and expected economic and financial costs of those savings...

Rister, M. Edward; Lacewell, Ronald D.; Sturdivant, Allen W.; Robinson, John R.C.; Popp, Michael C.

251

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Brownsville Irrigation District 72" and 54" Pipeline Replacing Main Canal Preliminary  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) and Bureau of Reclamation (BOR). The proposed project involves constructing a 72" and 54" pipeline to replace 2.29 miles of the Main Canal. Both nominal and real estimates of water and energy savings and expected economic and financial costs of those...

Rister, M. Edward; Lacewell, Ronald D.; Sturdivant, Allen W.; Robinson, John R.C.; Popp, Michael C.

252

Florida's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Florida. Florida. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Florida's 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Florida's 2nd congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Florida's 2nd congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in Florida's 2nd congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Florida's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Florida's 2nd congressional district City of Quincy, FL Smart Grid Project City of Tallahassee Smart Grid Project Talquin Electric Cooperative, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Florida's 2nd congressional district SunCity Registered Energy Companies in Florida's 2nd congressional district Center for Advanced Power Systems CAPS

253

ELECTRICAL DISTRICT NUMBER EIGHT  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ELECTRICAL DISTRICT NUMBER EIGHT ELECTRICAL DISTRICT NUMBER EIGHT Board of Directors Reply to: Ronald Rayner C. W. Adams James D. Downing, P.E. Chairman Billy Hickman 66768 Hwy 60 Brian Turner Marvin John P.O. Box 99 Vice-Chairman Jason Pierce Salome, AZ 85348 Denton Ross Jerry Rovey Secretary James N. Warkomski ED8@HARCUVARCO.COM John Utz Gary Wood PHONE:(928) 859-3647 Treasurer FAX: (928) 859-3145 Sent via e-mail Mr. Darrick Moe, Regional Manager Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region P. O. Box 6457 Phoenix, AZ 85005-6457 moe@wapa.gov; dswpwrmrk@wapa.gov Re: ED5-Palo Verde Hub Project Dear Mr. Moe, In response to the request for comments issued at the October 6 Parker-Davis Project customer th meeting, and in conjunction with comments previously submitted by the Southwest Public Power

254

New York's 7th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7th congressional district: Energy Resources 7th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in New York. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 7th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New York's 7th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in New York's 7th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in New York's 7th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in New York's 7th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in New York's 7th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 7th congressional district Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid

255

California's 49th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district: Energy Resources th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in California. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 49th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 49th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 49th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 49th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 49th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in California's 49th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 49th congressional district

256

New York's 21st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1st congressional district: Energy Resources 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in New York. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 21st congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New York's 21st congressional district 3 Registered Networking Organizations in New York's 21st congressional district 4 Registered Policy Organizations in New York's 21st congressional district 5 Registered Energy Companies in New York's 21st congressional district 6 Registered Financial Organizations in New York's 21st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 21st congressional district

257

New York's 11th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district: Energy Resources th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in New York. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 11th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New York's 11th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in New York's 11th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in New York's 11th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in New York's 11th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in New York's 11th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 11th congressional district Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid

258

Regional Districts (Texas)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Adjacent Water Control and Improvement Districts and Municipal Utility Districts can opt to form a Regional District to oversee water issues. Such districts may be created:(1) to purchase, own,...

259

Vermont's At-large congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Vermont's At-large congressional district: Energy Resources Vermont's At-large congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Vermont. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Vermont's At-large congressional district 2 Registered Policy Organizations in Vermont's At-large congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Vermont's At-large congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in Vermont's At-large congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Vermont's At-large congressional district Vermont Transco, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Policy Organizations in Vermont's At-large congressional district Clean Energy States Alliance

260

New York's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3th congressional district 3th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New York's 13th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in New York's 13th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in New York's 13th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in New York's 13th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in New York's 13th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 13th congressional district Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Demonstration Project Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in New York's 13th congressional district Endeavor Global GlobalData United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Vencon Management, Inc

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

South Dakota's At-large congressional district: Energy Resources | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Dakota's At-large congressional district: Energy Resources Dakota's At-large congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in South Dakota. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in South Dakota's At-large congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in South Dakota's At-large congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in South Dakota's At-large congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in South Dakota's At-large congressional district 5 Utility Companies in South Dakota's At-large congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in South Dakota's At-large congressional district Black Hills Power, Inc. Smart Grid Project

262

Pennsylvania's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Pennsylvania's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources Pennsylvania's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Pennsylvania. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Pennsylvania's 13th congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 13th congressional district 3 Registered Financial Organizations in Pennsylvania's 13th congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Pennsylvania's 13th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Pennsylvania's 13th congressional district PECO Energy Company Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 13th congressional district Advanced Renewables LLC

263

New York's 16th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

New York's 16th congressional district New York's 16th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New York's 16th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in New York's 16th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in New York's 16th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in New York's 16th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in New York's 16th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 16th congressional district Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Demonstration Project Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in New York's 16th congressional district Endeavor Global GlobalData United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

264

Maine's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Maine's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Maine's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Maine. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Maine's 1st congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Maine's 1st congressional district 3 Registered Financial Organizations in Maine's 1st congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Maine's 1st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Maine's 1st congressional district Central Maine Power Company Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Maine's 1st congressional district Ascendant Energy Company Inc Criterium Engineers International WoodFuels LLC

265

Tennessee's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3rd congressional district: Energy Resources 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Tennessee. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Tennessee's 3rd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Tennessee's 3rd congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Tennessee's 3rd congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Tennessee's 3rd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Tennessee's 3rd congressional district Electric Power Board of Chattanooga Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Tennessee's 3rd congressional district Energy Technology Data Exchange Oak Ridge National Laboratory

266

Massachusetts's 4th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4th congressional district: Energy Resources 4th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Massachusetts. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Massachusetts's 4th congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Massachusetts's 4th congressional district 3 Registered Financial Organizations in Massachusetts's 4th congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Massachusetts's 4th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Massachusetts's 4th congressional district NSTAR Electric Company Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Massachusetts's 4th congressional district Acela Energy Group Inc Aclara Software

267

New York's 10th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

0th congressional district 0th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New York's 10th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in New York's 10th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in New York's 10th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in New York's 10th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in New York's 10th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 10th congressional district Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Demonstration Project Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in New York's 10th congressional district Endeavor Global GlobalData United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Vencon Management, Inc

268

Water Protection Projects and Practices (Iowa)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This statute calls on soil and water conservation districts to carry out district-wide and multiple-district projects to support water protection practices, including projects to protect the state...

269

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- TA-1 Manhattan Laboratory - NM 11  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

TA-1 Manhattan Laboratory - NM 11 TA-1 Manhattan Laboratory - NM 11 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TA-1 MANHATTAN LABORATORY (NM.11 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Main Technical Area LASL LANL NM.11-1 NM.11-2 NM.11-3 Location: Los Alamos , New Mexico NM.11-3 Evaluation Year: 1985 NM.11-1 Site Operations: Nuclear weapons research and development. NM.11-1 NM.11-3 Site Disposition: Site Disposition NM.11-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium , Plutonium, Fission Products NM.11-1 NM.11-3 Radiological Survey(s): Yes NM.11-2 NM.11-3 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP NM.11-1 Also see Documents Related to TA-1 MANHATTAN LABORATORY NM.11-1 - DOE Memorandum/Checklist; Jones to File; Subject:

270

A machine learning model of Manhattan air pollution at high spatial resolution  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A machine-learning model was created to predict air pollution at high spatial resolution in Manhattan, New York using taxi trip data. Urban air pollution increases morbidity and mortality through respiratory and cardiovascular ...

Keeler, Rachel H. (Rachel Heiden)

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

271

Stratigraphy, structural geology and metamorphism of the Inwood Marble Formation, northern Manhattan, NYC, NY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of recrystallized dolomite and subordinate calcite marble the Inwood Marble was used for quarrying and mineral of northern Manhattan and by the late 1700s commercial quarries were in full operation. This work continued

Merguerian, Charles

272

UNITED STATE% ENGINEER OFFICE I" RaCLI MANHATTAN D' ISTRICT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

A-; . - .-.. w-1 - ,.. P..*e ,e.arzUE.m -JuTm-&a- . . . UNITED STATE% ENGINEER OFFICE I" RaCLI MANHATTAN D' ISTRICT RLFSR TO ; I. 0. eox a ,. STATJON J N E W YORK, N....

273

New York's 15th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

York. York. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 15th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New York's 15th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in New York's 15th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in New York's 15th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in New York's 15th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in New York's 15th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 15th congressional district Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Demonstration Project Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in New York's 15th congressional district Endeavor Global

274

Texas's 7th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Texas. Texas. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 7th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 7th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 7th congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Texas's 7th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Texas's 7th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 7th congressional district CenterPoint Energy Smart Grid Project Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 7th congressional district Institute for Energy Research Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 7th congressional district Air and Liquid Advisors ALA American Electric Technologies Inc American Photovoltaics

275

Texas's 8th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Texas. Texas. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 8th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 8th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 8th congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Texas's 8th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Texas's 8th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 8th congressional district CenterPoint Energy Smart Grid Project Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 8th congressional district Institute for Energy Research Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 8th congressional district Air and Liquid Advisors ALA American Electric Technologies Inc American Photovoltaics

276

New York's 14th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

New York. New York. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 14th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New York's 14th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in New York's 14th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in New York's 14th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in New York's 14th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in New York's 14th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 14th congressional district Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Demonstration Project Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in New York's 14th congressional district Endeavor Global

277

Texas's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Texas. Texas. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 2nd congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 2nd congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Texas's 2nd congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Texas's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 2nd congressional district CenterPoint Energy Smart Grid Project Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Texas's 2nd congressional district Institute for Energy Research Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 2nd congressional district Agribiofuels LLC Air and Liquid Advisors ALA American Electric Technologies Inc

278

New York's 17th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

York. York. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 17th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New York's 17th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in New York's 17th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in New York's 17th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in New York's 17th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in New York's 17th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 17th congressional district Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Demonstration Project Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in New York's 17th congressional district Endeavor Global

279

New York's 8th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

New York. New York. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 8th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New York's 8th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in New York's 8th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in New York's 8th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in New York's 8th congressional district 6 Utility Companies in New York's 8th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 8th congressional district Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Demonstration Project Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in New York's 8th congressional district Endeavor Global

280

Pagosa Springs District Heating District Heating Low Temperature...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Pagosa Springs District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Pagosa Springs District Heating District Heating Low...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Boise City Geothermal District Heating District Heating Low Temperatur...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Boise City Geothermal District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Boise City Geothermal District Heating District Heating...

282

San Bernardino District Heating District Heating Low Temperature...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

San Bernardino District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility San Bernardino District Heating Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating...

283

Kethcum District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Kethcum District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Kethcum District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal...

284

Philip District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Philip District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Philip District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal...

285

Midland District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Midland District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Midland District Heating Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location Midland,...

286

Elko County School District District Heating Low Temperature...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Elko County School District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Elko County School District District Heating Low Temperature...

287

California's 26th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

26th congressional district: Energy Resources 26th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in California. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 26th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 26th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 26th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 26th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 26th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 26th congressional district Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Demonstration

288

District heating campaign in Sweden  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During the fall of 1994 a district heating campaign was conducted in Sweden. The campaign was initiated because the Swedish district heating companies agreed that it was time to increase knowledge and awareness of district heating among the general public, especially among potential customers. The campaign involved many district heating companies and was organized as a special project. Advertising companies, media advisers, consultants and investigators were also engaged. The campaign was conducted in two stages, a national campaign followed by local campaign was conducted in two stages, a national campaign followed by local campaigns. The national campaign was conducted during two weeks of November 1994 and comprised advertising on commercial TV and in the press.

Stalebrant, R.E. [Swedish District Heating Association, Stockholm (Sweden)

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

International District Energy Association  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Since its formation in 1909, the International District Energy Association (IDEA) has served as a principal industry advocate and management resource for owners, operators, developers, and suppliers of district heating and cooling systems in cities, campuses, bases, and healthcare facilities. Today, with over 1,400 members in 26 countries, IDEA continues to organize high-quality technical conferences that inform, connect, and advance the industry toward higher energy efficiency and lower carbon emissions through innovation and investment in scalable sustainable solutions. With the support of DOE, IDEA performs industry research and market analysis to foster high impact projects and help transform the U.S. energy industry. IDEA was an active participant in the original Vision and Roadmap process and has continued to partner with DOE on combined heat and power (CHP) efforts across the country.

290

California's 8th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

8th congressional district: Energy Resources 8th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in California. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 8th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 8th congressional district 3 Registered Networking Organizations in California's 8th congressional district 4 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 8th congressional district 5 Registered Energy Companies in California's 8th congressional district 6 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 8th congressional district 7 Energy Generation Facilities in California's 8th congressional district

291

California's 12th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

California's 12th congressional district: Energy Resources California's 12th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in California. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 12th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in California's 12th congressional district 3 Registered Networking Organizations in California's 12th congressional district 4 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 12th congressional district 5 Registered Energy Companies in California's 12th congressional district 6 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 12th congressional district 7 Energy Generation Facilities in California's 12th congressional district

292

Florida's 6th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Florida's 6th congressional district Florida's 6th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Florida's 6th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Florida's 6th congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Florida's 6th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Florida's 6th congressional district City of Leesburg, Florida Smart Grid Project JEA Smart Grid Project Registered Networking Organizations in Florida's 6th congressional district North Florida Global Warming Study Group Registered Energy Companies in Florida's 6th congressional district American Solar Energy Barry Rutenberg and Associates Battery Park Industries Inc formerly Moltech Power Systems Inc Florida Home Energy and Resources Organization (Florida H.E.R.O.) G.W. Robinson Homes

293

North Carolina's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

th congressional district: Energy Resources th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in North Carolina. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in North Carolina's 13th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in North Carolina's 13th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in North Carolina's 13th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in North Carolina's 13th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in North Carolina's 13th congressional district Progress Energy Service Company, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in North Carolina's 13th congressional

294

Louisiana's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1st congressional district 1st congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Louisiana's 1st congressional district 3 Energy Incentives for Louisiana's 1st congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Louisiana's 1st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Louisiana's 1st congressional district Entergy New Orleans, Inc. Smart Grid Project Entergy Services, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Louisiana's 1st congressional district GT Energy Green Coast Enterprises New Orleans Preservation Research Center Sun Energy Group LLC Wayne Troyer & Associates Energy Incentives for Louisiana's 1st congressional district Climate Action Plan (New Orleans) JOB1 Workforce Development and Business Support (New Orleans, Louisiana) Net Metering (New Orleans, Louisiana)

295

Louisiana's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2nd congressional district 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Louisiana's 2nd congressional district 3 Energy Incentives for Louisiana's 2nd congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Louisiana's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Louisiana's 2nd congressional district Entergy New Orleans, Inc. Smart Grid Project Entergy Services, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Louisiana's 2nd congressional district GT Energy Green Coast Enterprises New Orleans Preservation Research Center Sun Energy Group LLC Wayne Troyer & Associates Energy Incentives for Louisiana's 2nd congressional district Climate Action Plan (New Orleans) JOB1 Workforce Development and Business Support (New Orleans, Louisiana) Net Metering (New Orleans, Louisiana)

296

Tennessee's 4th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tennessee. Tennessee. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Tennessee's 4th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Tennessee's 4th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Tennessee's 4th congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Tennessee's 4th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Tennessee's 4th congressional district Electric Power Board of Chattanooga Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Tennessee's 4th congressional district Energy Technology Data Exchange Oak Ridge National Laboratory Registered Energy Companies in Tennessee's 4th congressional district Big Biodiesel LLC Dogwood Energy LLC Eco Energy Inc Oak Ridge Micro Energy Inc SIAG Aerisyn LLC UtiliFlex Utility Companies in Tennessee's 4th congressional district

297

Legacy of a Bomb: The Manhattan Projects Impact on the Scientific Community  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1993. Atomic Harvest: Hanford and the Lethal Toll ofs technological innovations. Hanford Site remained a nucleartechnology. Some in Hanford and most of the structures were

Gao, Jany Huan

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

New Mexico's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

New Mexico. New Mexico. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New Mexico's 3rd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New Mexico's 3rd congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in New Mexico's 3rd congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in New Mexico's 3rd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New Mexico's 3rd congressional district Ktech Corporation Smart Grid Demonstration Project Public Service Company of New Mexico Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in New Mexico's 3rd congressional district Howe Group LLC Sandia National Laboratories Registered Energy Companies in New Mexico's 3rd congressional district Advent Solar Inc Affordable Solar Group Array Technologies, Inc.

299

New Mexico's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Mexico. Mexico. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New Mexico's 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in New Mexico's 2nd congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in New Mexico's 2nd congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in New Mexico's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New Mexico's 2nd congressional district Ktech Corporation Smart Grid Demonstration Project Public Service Company of New Mexico Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Research Institutions in New Mexico's 2nd congressional district Sandia National Laboratories Registered Energy Companies in New Mexico's 2nd congressional district Advent Solar Inc Affordable Solar Group Array Technologies, Inc. Avalon Solar LLC

300

Industrial Revenue Bond Program (District of Columbia)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The District provides below market bond financing to lower the costs of borrowing for qualified capital construction and renovation projects. The program is available to non-profits, institutions,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Virginia's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Registered Research Institutions in Virginia's 5th congressional district Registered Research Institutions in Virginia's 5th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Virginia's 5th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Virginia's 5th congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in Virginia's 5th congressional district Registered Research Institutions in Virginia's 5th congressional district The Global Innovation Commons Registered Networking Organizations in Virginia's 5th congressional district Virginia Energy Project Registered Energy Companies in Virginia's 5th congressional district Aker Wade Power Technologies LLC Apex Wind Energy Inc Fiberight LLC Greenlight Biofuels Greenlight Energy Resources Inc GER Multitrade Biomass Holdings LLC Sol Sage Energy Energy Generation Facilities in Virginia's 5th congressional district

302

District of Columbia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Columbia: Energy Resources Columbia: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia GeoNames ID 4138106 This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. The District of Columbia is the capital of the United States of America. Contents 1 State Energy Program Funding 2 Related Information 2.1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in District of Columbia 2.2 Registered Research Institutions in District of Columbia 2.3 Registered Networking Organizations in District of Columbia 2.4 Registered Policy Organizations in District of Columbia 2.5 Registered Energy Companies in District of Columbia 2.6 Registered Financial Organizations in District of Columbia 2.7 Energy Incentives for District of Columbia 2.8 Utility Companies in District of Columbia 3 References

303

District Wide Geothermal Heating Conversion Blaine County School...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Conversion Blaine County School District This project will impact the geothermal energy development market by showing that ground source heat pump systems using production...

304

Wisconsin's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Project Registered Energy Companies in Wisconsin's 5th congressional district A.O. Smith Johnson Controls Kohl's Magnatek Inc Optima Batteries Oskosh Tech Laboratories Inc WE...

305

Florida's 8th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Florida. Florida. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Florida's 8th congressional district Intellon Corporation Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Florida's 8th congressional district Alternative Concepts and Technology Florida Power Electronics Center FPEC Florida Solar Energy Center (Building America Partnership for Improved Residential Construction FuelClinic Iosil Energy Corporation Kinetic Energy Systems Planar Energy Devices Energy Generation Facilities in Florida's 8th congressional district Space Coast Next Generation Solar Energy Center Solar Power Plant Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Florida%27s_8th_congressional_district&oldid=182793" Categories: Places Stubs Congressional Districts What links here Related changes

306

Indiana's 7th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Indiana. Indiana. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Indiana's 7th congressional district Indianapolis Power and Light Company Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Indiana's 7th congressional district Clean Wave Ventures Corporate Systems Engineering EnerDel Government of Indiana Indiana Office of Energy Defense Development Indiana Soybean Alliance Indianapolis Power Light Simon Property Group Utility Companies in Indiana's 7th congressional district Indianapolis Power & Light Co Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Indiana%27s_7th_congressional_district&oldid=188396" Categories: Places Stubs Congressional Districts What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Browse properties 429 Throttled (bot load)

307

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Cameron County Irrigation District No. 2 (San Benito) Interconnect Between Canals 39 and 13-A1 and Replacement of Rio Grande Diversion Pumping Plant  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of the Bureau of Reclamations evaluation of proposed projects: c60 Number of acre-feet of water saved per dollar of construction costs; c60 Number of British Thermal Units (BTU) of energy saved per dollar of construction costs; and c60 Dollars of annual... Documentation for Sonia Kaniger, March, 2003 Manager, Cameron County Irrigation District No. 2 (San Benito) page ii of 82 associated with energy savings. There are energy savings both from pumping less water forthcoming from reducing leaks and from improving...

Rister, M. Edward; Lacewell, Ronald D.; Sturdivant, Allen W.; Robinson, John R.C.; Popp, Michael C.; Ellis, John R.

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

Roadmap to the Project: Experiments List  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

List of Experiments Plutonium Injection PI-1. Plutonium Injection Studies DURING 1945 TO 1947, 18 persons were injected with amounts of plutonium at the Manhattan Engineer District Hospital in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, (1 patient), at Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, New York (11 patients), at Billings Hospital of the University of Chicago (3 patients), and at the University Hospital of the University of California in San Francisco (3 patients). Excreta were obtained from patients and sent to Los Alamos for plutonium analysis. These data were used to establish mathematical equations describing plutonium excretion rates. This research was funded by the Manhattan Engineer District; follow-up studies were supported by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration. (This experiment was referenced in the Markey report and included in The DOE Roadmap of February 1995.)

309

Florida's 20th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Florida. Florida. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Florida's 20th congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Florida's 20th congressional district 3 Registered Financial Organizations in Florida's 20th congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Florida's 20th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Florida's 20th congressional district Florida Power & Light Company Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Florida's 20th congressional district Advanced Green Technologies BTX Holdings Inc Biodiesel of South Florida LLC Biofuels Digest Cambridge Project Development Car Charging Group Inc Caribbean Energy Resources Corp ClimeCo Corporation Electron Solar Energy Formerly Envigra Inc Ener1 Inc EnerFuel Enventure Partners Ltd

310

Co-sponsored second quarter progress review conference on district heating  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A summary of the progress review conference on district heating and cooling systems is presented. The agenda and lists of speakers and attendees are presented. A history of district heating and some present needs and future policies are given and an excerpt from the National District Heating Program Strategy (DOE, March 1980) is included. Following the presentation, District Heating and Cooling Systems Program, by Alan M. Rubin, a fact sheet on DOE's Integrated Community Energy Systems Program and information from an oral presentation, District Heating and Cooling Systems for Communities Through Power Plant Retrofit Distribution Network, are given. The Second Quarterly Oral Report to the US DOE on the District Heating and Cooling Project in Detroit; the executive summary of the Piqua, Ohio District Heating and Cooling Demonstration Project; the Second Quarterly Report of the Moorehead, Minnesota District Heating Project; and the report from the Moorehead, Minnesota mayor on the Hot Water District Heating Project are presented.

None

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

Ohio's 16th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

6th congressional district: Energy Resources 6th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Ohio. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Ohio's 16th congressional district City of Wadsworth, OH Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Ohio's 16th congressional district Four Seasons Windpower, LLC King Machine & Tool Co. Liquid Resources LLC Magnetech Industrial Services Morning Mist LLC Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Proe Power Systems SOFCo EFS Holdings LLC Wind Turbines of Ohio LLC Utility Companies in Ohio's 16th congressional district City of Wadsworth, Ohio (Utility Company) Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Ohio%27s_16th_congressional_district&oldid=196994"

312

Pennsylvania's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2nd congressional district 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 2nd congressional district 3 Registered Financial Organizations in Pennsylvania's 2nd congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Pennsylvania's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Pennsylvania's 2nd congressional district PECO Energy Company Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 2nd congressional district Advanced Renewables LLC Aircuity Inc AlumiFuel Power Inc Biofuel Advanced Research and Development LLC BARD BlackGold Biofuels Blue Hill Investment Partners LLC CDI Corporation Chameleon Optics Inc Clean Markets Energy Cooperative Association of Pennsylvania Epuron LLC Gamesa Energy USA Princeton Energy Systems PES Real WinWin Rohm and Haas Co

313

Kansas's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1st congressional district: Energy Resources 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Kansas. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Kansas's 1st congressional district Midwest Energy Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Kansas's 1st congressional district Conestoga Energy Partners LLC ESE Alcohol Gateway Ethanol LLC formerly Wildcat Bio Energy LLC Kansas Ethanol LLC Nesika Energy LLC Orion Ethanol Reeve Agri Energy Inc Western Plains Energy LLC Utility Companies in Kansas's 1st congressional district Midwest Energy Inc Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Kansas%27s_1st_congressional_district&oldid=189120

314

A Process for Predicting Manhole Events in Manhattan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We present a knowledge discovery and data mining process developed as part of the Columbia/Con Edison project on manhole event prediction. This process can assist with real-world prioritization problems that involve raw ...

Isaac, Delfina

315

A Geothermal District-Heating System and Alternative Energy Research...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

District-Heating System and Alternative Energy Research Park on the NM Tech Campus Geothermal Project Jump to: navigation, search Last modified on July 22, 2011. Project Title A...

316

Financing Energy Upgrades for K-12 School Districts  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Oxford Area Community School District (Michigan) Oxford Area Community School District (Michigan) In 2007, Michigan's Oxford Area Community School District (OACSD) entered into an energy savings performance contract (ESPC) and issued limited tax general obligation bonds to fund the up-front costs of almost $3 million of energy-related improvements. The school district partnered with an energy services company (ESCO) to complete the project and has realized significant annual savings - approximately $70,000 of positive cash flow ($340,000 gross savings) annually. Efficiency Enables the Replacement of Aging Equipment The school district's administrators were motivated to pursue energy efficiency primarily by

317

Wyoming's At-large congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wyoming's At-large congressional district: Energy Resources Wyoming's At-large congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Wyoming. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Wyoming's At-large congressional district Cheyenne Light, Fuel and Power Company Smart Grid Project Powder River Energy Corporation Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Wyoming's At-large congressional district Blue Sky Batteries Inc Blue Sky Group Inc HTH Wind Energy Inc LappinTech LLC Nacel Energy Nanomaterials Discovery Corporation NDC Pathfinder Renewable Wind Energy PowerSHIFT Energy Company Inc TMA Global Wind Energy Systems TriLateral Energy LLC Utility Companies in Wyoming's At-large congressional district

318

Michigan's 14th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4th congressional district: Energy Resources 4th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Michigan. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Michigan's 14th congressional district Detroit Edison Company Smart Grid Project The Detroit Edison Company Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Energy Companies in Michigan's 14th congressional district DTE DTE Energy Venture formerly EdVenture Capital Corporation EaglePicher Horizon Batteries LLC Ford Ford Electric Battery Group Ford Motor Co Sustainable Technologies and Hybrid Programme General Motors NextEnergy Trenton Forging Utility Companies in Michigan's 14th congressional district Detroit Edison Co

319

Florida's 21st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Florida's 21st congressional district: Energy Resources Florida's 21st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Florida. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Florida's 21st congressional district Florida Power & Light Company Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Florida's 21st congressional district Biodiesel of South Florida LLC Biofuels Digest Cambridge Project Development Caribbean Energy Resources Corp ClimeCo Corporation Electron Solar Energy Formerly Envigra Inc Enventure Partners Ltd Lennar Homes & Lennar Urban MGM International SRT Group Inc Utility Companies in Florida's 21st congressional district Florida Power & Light Co.

320

Category:Congressional Districts | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Congressional Districts Congressional Districts Jump to: navigation, search This category contains all congressional districts in the United States of America. Pages in category "Congressional Districts" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 437 total. (previous 200) (next 200) A Alabama's 1st congressional district Alabama's 2nd congressional district Alabama's 3rd congressional district Alabama's 4th congressional district Alabama's 5th congressional district Alabama's 6th congressional district Alabama's 7th congressional district Alaska's At-large congressional district Arizona's 1st congressional district Arizona's 2nd congressional district Arizona's 3rd congressional district Arizona's 4th congressional district Arizona's 5th congressional district Arizona's 6th congressional district

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

North Carolina's 12th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

12th congressional district: Energy Resources 12th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in North Carolina. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in North Carolina's 12th congressional district Duke Energy Business Services LLC Smart Grid Project Duke Energy Business Services, LLC Smart Grid Demonstration Project Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in North Carolina's 12th congressional district Abundant Power Bank of America Camstar Systems Inc Celgard LLC Coalogix Inc Dragonfly Capital Duke Power Greenwood Capital Partners MCF Advisors LLC Methane Credit Metso Power National Gypsum NewGen Fuel Technologies Ltd NewGen Technologies Inc Formerly Bongiovi Entertainment Inc

322

Missouri's 9th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9th congressional district: Energy Resources 9th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Missouri. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Missouri's 9th congressional district City of Fulton, Missouri Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Missouri's 9th congressional district AFuels Technologies LLC Aperion Energy Systems East Central Ag Products MEMC Electronic Materials Inc Mid America Biofuels LLC Missouri Bio Products Missouri Department of National Resources Energy Center Mo DNR Missouri Ethanol LLC National Ethanol Vehicle Coalition NEVC Northeast Missouri Grain LLC Renewable Alternatives LLC US Ethanol Vehicle Coalition Utility Companies in Missouri's 9th congressional district

323

Missouri's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3rd congressional district: Energy Resources 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Missouri. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Missouri's 3rd congressional district The Boeing Company Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Energy Companies in Missouri's 3rd congressional district A2Wind Limited Affinity Wind LLC Akermin Inc Armstrong Teasdale Future Energy Group Clean Power Design CleanTech Biofuels International Fuel Technology Inc Secure Energy Inc Solar Night Industries Inc Solutia Supercritical Recovery Systems LLC Wind Capital Group Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Missouri%27s_3rd_congressional_district&oldid=194599

324

Pennsylvania's 8th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2 Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 8th congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 8th congressional district 3 Registered Financial Organizations in Pennsylvania's 8th congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Pennsylvania's 8th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Pennsylvania's 8th congressional district PECO Energy Company Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 8th congressional district Advanced Renewables LLC Aircuity Inc AlumiFuel Power Inc Biofuel Advanced Research and Development LLC BARD BlackGold Biofuels Blue Hill Investment Partners LLC CDI Corporation Chameleon Optics Inc Clean Markets DrexelSolar Energy Cooperative Association of Pennsylvania Epuron LLC Fibrominn LLC Fibrowatt LLC Gamesa Energy USA Homeland Renewable Energy LLC

325

Florida's 24th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

district: Energy Resources district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Florida. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Florida's 24th congressional district Intellon Corporation Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Florida's 24th congressional district Alternative Concepts and Technology Etatech Inc Florida Power Electronics Center FPEC Florida Solar Energy Center (Building America Partnership for Improved Residential Construction FuelClinic Iosil Energy Corporation Planar Energy Devices Solis Energy Inc Energy Generation Facilities in Florida's 24th congressional district Space Coast Next Generation Solar Energy Center Solar Power Plant

326

Missouri's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1st congressional district: Energy Resources 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Missouri. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Missouri's 1st congressional district The Boeing Company Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Energy Companies in Missouri's 1st congressional district A2Wind Limited Affinity Wind LLC Akermin Inc Armstrong Teasdale Future Energy Group Clean Power Design CleanTech Biofuels Confluence Solar International Fuel Technology Inc Secure Energy Inc Solar Night Industries Inc Solutia Wind Capital Group Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Missouri%27s_1st_congressional_district&oldid=194597

327

Surveys of the distribution of seabirds found in the vicinity of proposed geothermal project subzones in the District of Puna, Hawaii. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 1993, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) entered into an interagency agreement with the Department of Energy (DOE) to conduct specific biological surveys to identify potential impacts of the proposed geothermal development on the natural resources of the East Rift Zone. This report presents information from published literature information and new field data on seabird populations on the island of Hawaii. These data are analyzed with regard to potential impacts of geothermal development on seabird populations in this area. Fifteen species of seabirds, waterbirds, and shorebirds are documented or suspected of being found using habitats within or immediately adjacent to the three geothermal subzones located in the Puna district on the island of Hawai`i. Of these species, two are on the federal Endangered Species List, three are on the State of Hawaii Endangered Species List, and all 15 are protected by the federal Migratory Bird Act.

Reynolds, M.; Ritchotte, G.; Viggiano, A.; Dwyer, J.; Nielsen, B.; Jacobi, J.D. [Fish and Wildlife Service, Hawaii National Park, HI (United States). Hawaii Research Station

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

District of Columbia | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 17, 2010 March 17, 2010 Deputy Secretary Daniel Poneman's Remarks to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy March 17, 2010 March 15, 2010 District of Columbia Recovery Act State Memo The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) is making a meaningful down payment on the nation's energy and environmental future. The Recovery Act investments in the District of Columbia reflect a broad range of clean energy projects, from energy efficiency and the smart grid to renewable energy and advanced battery manufacturing. Through these investments, the District of Columbia's businesses, non-profits, and local governments are creating quality jobs today and positioning the District of Columbia to play an important role in the new energy economy of the future. March 1, 2010

329

Modesto Irrigation District | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Modesto Irrigation District Modesto Irrigation District (Redirected from MID) Jump to: navigation, search Name Modesto Irrigation District Place Modesto, California Utility Id 12745 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location WECC NERC WECC Yes ISO CA Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Transmission Yes Activity Buying Transmission Yes Activity Distribution Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes Activity Bundled Services Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] SGIC[2] Energy Information Administration Form 826[3] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Modesto Irrigation District Smart Grid Project was awarded $1,493,149

330

Geothermal district piping - A primer  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Transmission and distribution piping constitutes approximately 40 -60% of the capital costs of typical geothermal district heating systems. Selections of economical piping suitable for the fluid chemistry is critical. Presently, most piping (56%) in geothermal systems is of asbestos cement construction. Some fiberglass (19%) and steel (19%) is also in use. Identification of an economical material to replace asbestos cement is important to future project development. By providing information on relative costs, purchase considerations, existing material performance and new products, this report seeks to provide a background of information to the potential pipe purchaser. A brief discussion of the use of uninsulated piping in geothermal district heating systems is also provided. 5 refs., 19 figs., 1 tab.

Rafferty, K.

1989-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Manhattan Project: The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Alpha Racetrack, Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant, Oak Ridge THE URANIUM PATH TO THE BOMB Alpha Racetrack, Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant, Oak Ridge THE URANIUM PATH TO THE BOMB (1942-1944) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 The uranium path to the atomic bomb ran through Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Only if the new plants built at Oak Ridge produced enough enriched uranium-235 would a uranium bomb be possible. General Groves placed two methods into production: 1) electromagnetic, based on the principle that charged particles of the lighter isotope would be deflected more when passing through a magnetic field; and 2) gaseous diffusion, based on the principle that molecules of the lighter isotope, uranium-235, would pass more readily through a porous barrier. Full-scale electromagnetic and gaseous diffusion production plants were built at Oak Ridge at sites designated as "Y-12" and "K-25", respectively.

332

Manhattan Project: Final Approval to Build the Bomb, Washington, D.C.,  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

President Roosevelt signs declaration of war with Japan, December 8, 1941. FINAL APPROVAL TO BUILD THE BOMB President Roosevelt signs declaration of war with Japan, December 8, 1941. FINAL APPROVAL TO BUILD THE BOMB (Washington, D.C., December 1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 Anxious as he was to get moving, Leslie Groves decided to make one final quality control check. On November 18, 1942, Groves appointed Warren K. Lewis of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to head a final review committee, comprised of himself and three DuPont representatives. During the final two weeks of November, the committee traveled from New York to Chicago to Berkeley and back again through Chicago. It endorsed the work on gaseous diffusion at Columbia, though it made some organizational recommendations; in fact, the Lewis committee advocated elevating gaseous diffusion to first priority and expressed reservations about the electromagnetic program despite an impassioned presentation by Ernest Lawrence in Berkeley. Upon returning to Chicago, Crawford H. Greenewalt, a member of the Lewis committee, was present at Stagg Field when CP-1 (Chicago Pile #1) first went critical. (For more on CP-1, skip ahead to "Early Pile Design, 1942.") Significant as this moment was in the history of physics, it came after the Lewis committee endorsed moving piles to the pilot stage and one day after Groves instructed DuPont to move into pile design and construction.

333

Manhattan Project: Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Oak Ridge WORKING K-25 INTO THE MIX K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Oak Ridge WORKING K-25 INTO THE MIX (Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1943-1944) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 In 1941 and 1942, gaseous diffusion had been considered by many as the most promising method of enriching uranium. The British in the influential 1941 MAUD Report had advocated the use of gaseous diffusion alone, and the 1942 Lewis committee placed it first among isotope separation methods. Despite the soundness of the theory, the process had yet to produce any samples of enriched uranium when the K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant was authorized in late 1942.

334

Manhattan Project: Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Schematic of the X-10 Graphite Reactor, Oak Ridge FINAL REACTOR DESIGN AND X-10 Schematic of the X-10 Graphite Reactor, Oak Ridge FINAL REACTOR DESIGN AND X-10 (Met Lab and Oak Ridge [Clinton], 1942-1943) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 Before any plutonium could be chemically separated from uranium for a bomb, however, that uranium would first have to be irradiated in a production pile. CP-1 had been a success as a scientific experiment, but the pile was built on such a small scale that recovering any significant amounts of plutonium from it was impractical. In the fall of 1942, scientists of the Met Lab had decided to build a second Fermi pile at Argonne as soon as his experiments on the first were completed and to proceed with the "Mae West" design for a helium-cooled production pile as well. When DuPont engineers assessed the Met Lab's plans in the late fall, they agreed that helium should be given first priority. They placed heavy water second and urged an all-out effort to produce more of this highly effective moderator. Bismuth and water were ranked third and fourth in DuPont's analysis. Priorities began to change when Enrico Fermi's CP-1 calculations demonstrated a higher value for the neutron reproduction factor k (for a theoretical reactor of infinite size) than anyone had anticipated. Met Lab scientists concluded that a water-cooled pile was now feasible. Crawford Greenewalt, head of the DuPont effort, continued, however, to support helium cooling.

335

Manhattan Project: Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, Met Lab, 1942-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Glenn T. Seaborg looks through a microscope at the world's first sample of pure plutonium, Met Lab, August 20, 1942. SEABORG AND PLUTONIUM CHEMISTRY Glenn T. Seaborg looks through a microscope at the world's first sample of pure plutonium, Met Lab, August 20, 1942. SEABORG AND PLUTONIUM CHEMISTRY (Met Lab, 1942-1944) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 While the Met Lab labored to make headway on pile (reactor) design, Glenn T. Seaborg (right) and his coworkers were trying to learn enough about transuranium chemistry to ensure that plutonium could be chemically separated from the uranium that would be irradiated in a production pile. Using lanthanum fluoride as a carrier, Seaborg isolated a weighable sample of plutonium in August 1942. At the same time, Isadore Perlman and William J. Knox explored the peroxide method of separation; John E. Willard studied various materials to determine which best adsorbed (gathered on its surface) plutonium; Theodore T. Magel and Daniel K. Koshland, Jr., researched solvent-extraction processes; and Harrison S. Brown and Orville F. Hill performed experiments into volatility reactions. Basic research on plutonium's chemistry continued as did work on radiation and fission products.

336

Manhattan Project: The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Painting of CP-1 going critical THE PLUTONIUM PATH TO THE BOMB Painting of CP-1 going critical THE PLUTONIUM PATH TO THE BOMB (1942-1944) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 Plutonium, produced in a uranium-fueled reactor (pile), was the second path taken toward achieving an atomic bomb. Design work on a full-scale plutonium production reactor began at the Met Lab in June 1942. Scientists at the Met Lab had the technical expertise to design a production pile, but construction and management on an industrial scale required an outside contractor. General Groves convinced the DuPont Corporation to become the primary contractor for plutonium production. With input from the Met Lab and DuPont, Groves selected a site at Hanford, Washington, on the Columbia River, to build the full-scale production reactors.

337

Recovery Act Helps Y-12 Exceed Cleanup Goal at Manhattan Project...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Office. "It has also allowed us to contribute to the two primary goals of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act-- support jobs and spur...

338

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Edinburg Irrigation District Hidalgo County No. 1 - 72" Pipeline Replacing Delivery Canal and Multi-Size Pipeline Replacing Delivery Canal  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

). Both nominal and real, expected economic and financial costs of water and energy savings are identified throughout the anticipated useful lives for both components of the proposed project (i.e., 72" pipeline replacing a segment of delivery canal along...

Rister, M. Edward; Lacewell, Ronald D.; Sturdivant, Allen W.; Robinson, John R.C.; Popp, Michael C.; Ellis, John R.

339

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Hidalgo County Irrigation District No. 2 (San Juan) - 48" Pipeline Replacing Wisconsin Canal - Final  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Development Bank (NADBank) and Bureau of Reclamation. The proposed project involves constructing a 48" pipeline to replace the Wisconsin Canal. Both nominal and real estimates of water and energy savings and expected economic and financial costs of those...

Rister, Edward; Lacewell, Ronald; Sturdivant, Allen; Robinson, John; Popp, Michael

340

Indiana's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

5th congressional district: Energy Resources 5th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Indiana. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Indiana's 5th congressional district Indianapolis Power and Light Company Smart Grid Project Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Indiana's 5th congressional district Central Indiana Ethanol LLC Clean Wave Ventures Corporate Systems Engineering E Biofuels LLC EnerDel Government of Indiana Indiana Office of Energy Defense Development Indiana Soybean Alliance Indianapolis Power Light National Renewables Cooperative Organization NRCO Simon Property Group

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Towards Intelligent District Heating.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??A district heating system consists of one or more production units supplying energy in the form of heated water through a distribution pipe network to (more)

Johansson, Christian

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

District cooling gets hot  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Utilities across the country are adopting cool storage methods, such as ice-storage and chilled-water tanks, as an economical and environmentally safe way to provide cooling for cities and towns. The use of district cooling, in which cold water or steam is pumped to absorption chillers and then to buildings via a central community chiller plant, is growing strongly in the US. In Chicago, San Diego, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, and elsewhere, independent district-energy companies and utilities are refurbishing neglected district-heating systems and adding district cooling, a technology first developed approximately 35 years ago.

Seeley, R.S.

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

343

Financing Energy Upgrades for K-12 School Districts  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Financing Energy Upgrades for K-12 School Districts Financing Energy Upgrades for K-12 School Districts Page 2 Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 What This Guide Covers .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter 1: Principles of Financing Energy Upgrades for Schools .................................................................................................. 7 Principle 1. Start with Clear Project Objectives.......................................................................................................................................... 7

344

Assessment of district energy supply from Schiller Generating Station  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper addresses the feasibility analysis of retrofitting the Public Service of New Hampshire Schiller Generating Station to supply district heating to potential customers. The project involved analysis of power plant retrofit and comparison of district heating cost to the cost of heat supplied with gas boilers for a housing development in close proximity to the Schiller Station.

Hitchko, M. [Public Service Company of New Hampshire, Portsmouth, NH (United States); Major, W. [Joseph Technology Corporation, Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ (United States)

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

345

Hawaii Geothermal Project annotated bibliography: Biological resources of the geothermal subzones, the transmission corridors and the Puna District, Island of Hawaii  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Task 1 of the Hawaii Geothermal Project Interagency Agreement between the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Department of Energy-Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE) includes an annotated bibliography of published and unpublished documents that cover biological issues related to the lowland rain forest in Puna, adjacent areas, transmission corridors, and in the proposed Hawaii Geothermal Project (HGP). The 51 documents reviewed in this report cover the main body of biological information for these projects. The full table of contents and bibliography for each document is included along with two copies (as requested in the Interagency Agreement) of the biological sections of each document. The documents are reviewed in five main categories: (1) geothermal subzones (29 documents); (2) transmission cable routes (8 documents); (3) commercial satellite launching facility (Spaceport; 1 document); (4) manganese nodule processing facility (2 documents); (5) water resource development (1 document); and (6) ecosystem stability and introduced species (11 documents).

Miller, S.E.; Burgett, J.M. [Fish and Wildlife Service, Honolulu, HI (United States). Pacific Islands Office

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

City of Klamath Falls District Heating District Heating Low Temperatur...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name City of Klamath Falls District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility City of Klamath...

347

Economic and Conservation Evaluation of Capital Renovation Projects: Hidalgo County Irrigation District No. 2 (San Juan) - Rehabilitation of Alamo Main Canal - Final  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

). The proposed project primarily consists of relining the Alamo Main canal and installing a flow-management system in the Alamo Main canal. Both nominal and real estimates of water and energy savings and expected economic and financial costs of those savings...

Rister, M. Edward; Lacewell, Ronald D.; Sturdivant, Allen W.

348

IRRIGATION & ELECTRICAL DISTRICTS  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

IRRIGATION & ELECTRICAL DISTRICTS IRRIGATION & ELECTRICAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA R.D. JUSTICE SUITE 140 WILLIAM H. STACY PRESIDENT 340 E. PALM LANE SECRETARY-TREASURER PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85004-4603 ELSTON GRUBAUGH (602) 254-5908 ROBERT S. LYNCH VICE-PRESIDENT Fax (602) 257-9542 COUNSEL AND

349

IRRIGATION & ELECTRICAL DISTRICTS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

IRRIGATION & ELECTRICAL DISTRICTS IRRIGATION & ELECTRICAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA R. GALE PEARCE SUITE 140 ELSTON GRUBAUGH PRESIDENT 340 E. PALM LANE SECRETARY-TREASURER PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85004-4603 R.D. JUSTICE (602) 254-5908 ROBERT S. LYNCH VICE-PRESIDENT Fax (602) 257-9542 ASSISTANT SECRETARY-TREASURER

350

California's 4th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

district: Energy Resources district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in California. Registered Energy Companies in California's 4th congressional district American River Ventures ClipperCreek Inc Connect Renewable Energy Inc DayStar Solar LLC formerly International Energy Trading LLC Environmental Capital Group LLC Green Energy Project Development INC G E P D Pacific Power Management SMA America SMA America, LLC Solar Power Inc SPI United Natural Foods Energy Generation Facilities in California's 4th congressional district Oroville Biomass Facility Rocklin Biomass Facility SPI Lincoln Biomass Facility SPI Loyalton Biomass Facility Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=California%27s_4th_congressional_district&oldid=18156

351

New Jersey's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jersey's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources Jersey's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in New Jersey. Registered Energy Companies in New Jersey's 13th congressional district Deepwater Wind Fuel Bio One LLC Gibbs Energy LLC IDT Energy Innovation Fuels Public Service Electric & Gas Public Service Enterprise Group (PSE&G) Public Service Enterprise Group PSEG Soltage Inc TurtleEnergy LLC Ultralife Corporation formerly Ultralife Batteries Inc Energy Generation Facilities in New Jersey's 13th congressional district Steven's Institute Solar Project Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=New_Jersey%27s_13th_congressional_district&oldid=195835"

352

District of Columbia Recovery Act State Memo | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

District of Columbia Recovery Act State Memo District of Columbia Recovery Act State Memo District of Columbia Recovery Act State Memo The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) is making a meaningful down payment on the nation's energy and environmental future. The Recovery Act investments in the District of Columbia reflect a broad range of clean energy projects, from energy efficiency and the smart grid to renewable energy and advanced battery manufacturing. Through these investments, the District of Columbia's businesses, non-profits, and local governments are creating quality jobs today and positioning the District of Columbia to play an important role in the new energy economy of the future. Washington, D.C. Recovery Act State Memo More Documents & Publications New York Recovery Act State Memo

353

Return temperature influence of a district heating network on the CHP plant production costs.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

?? The aim of this Project is to study the influence of high return temperatures in district heating on the costs for heat and power (more)

Sallent, Roger

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

354

Microsoft Word - CX-AlveyDistrictWoodPoles-FY14_WEB.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2014 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-Alvey SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Stacey Hensley Project Manager - TEP-TPP-4 Proposed Action: 2014 Alvey District Wood Pole...

355

Georgia's 9th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Georgia. Georgia. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Georgia's 9th congressional district Tri State Electric Membership Corporation Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Georgia's 9th congressional district Conservation Resource Solutions ECO Solutions LLC Greenleaf Environmental Solutions Wilson and Dalton Utility Companies in Georgia's 9th congressional district Tri-State Electric Member Corp Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Georgia%27s_9th_congressional_district&oldid=185474" Categories: Places Stubs Congressional Districts What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Browse properties About us Disclaimers Energy blogs Linked Data Developer services OpenEI partners with a broad range of international organizations to grow

356

Georgia's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

5th congressional district: Energy Resources 5th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Georgia. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Georgia's 5th congressional district Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Georgia's 5th congressional district Ajeetco Alpha Renewable Energy American Process Inc C2 Biofuels Empower Energy Technology Ethanol Capital Funding Future Energy Resources G2 Energy GE Energy Formerly GE Power Systems GE Wind Energy Geoplasma LLC Georgia Power Global Energy Holdings Group formerly Xethanol Corporation Home Depot Foundation International Truck Navajo Wind Energy Plum Combustion

357

Maryland's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Maryland. Maryland. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Maryland's 2nd congressional district Baltimore Gas and Electric Company Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Maryland's 2nd congressional district Alten Industries Inc Constellation Energy Group Sea Solar Power International Inc Solar Style Inc ThermoChem Recovery International Inc Utility Companies in Maryland's 2nd congressional district Baltimore Gas & Electric Co Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Maryland%27s_2nd_congressional_district&oldid=193462" Categories: Places Stubs Congressional Districts What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Browse properties 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load)

358

Texas's 4th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4th congressional district: Energy Resources 4th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Texas. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 4th congressional district Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 4th congressional district 10Charge Inc 21 Century Solar Inc AEP Wind Energy LLC ASAlliances Biofuels Defunct AT T Inc American Renewable Fuels Biodiesel Investment Group Biomass Energy Resources BroadStar Wind Systems Catalyst Renewables Climate Leaders Joint Venture Consolidated Biofuels Inc Continental Biofuels Corporation Digital Gas Inc Distribution Drive Durra Building Systems

359

Nevada's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3rd congressional district: Energy Resources 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Nevada. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Nevada's 3rd congressional district NV Energy, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Nevada's 3rd congressional district Algodyne Ethanol Energy Inc Bio Solutions Manufacturing Inc Innovative Energy Solutions Inc K2 Energy Solutions formerly Peak Energy Solutions Li ion Motors Corp formerly EV Innovations Inc Merlin Contracting Power Efficiency Corporation PEFF Powered by Renewables formerly Nevada Wind Renewable Capital Renewable Energy Resources Inc Renewable Powertech Inc Sol-Up USA, LLC Summit Energy Ventures LLC

360

Texas's 32nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Texas's 32nd congressional district: Energy Resources Texas's 32nd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Texas. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 32nd congressional district Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 32nd congressional district 10Charge Inc 1Soltech Inc 21-Century Silicon, Inc. AEP Wind Energy LLC ASAlliances Biofuels Defunct AT T Inc American Renewable Fuels Biodiesel Investment Group Biomass Energy Resources BroadStar Wind Systems Catalyst Renewables Climate Leaders Joint Venture Continental Biofuels Corporation Digital Gas Inc Distribution Drive DistributionDrive

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Nevada's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1st congressional district: Energy Resources 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Nevada. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Nevada's 1st congressional district NV Energy, Inc. Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Nevada's 1st congressional district Algodyne Ethanol Energy Inc Bio Solutions Manufacturing Inc Innovative Energy Solutions Inc Li ion Motors Corp formerly EV Innovations Inc Merlin Contracting Power Efficiency Corporation PEFF Powered by Renewables formerly Nevada Wind Renewable Capital Renewable Energy Resources Inc Renewable Powertech Inc Sol-Up USA, LLC Summit Energy Ventures LLC UNLV Center for Energy Research CER

362

Tennessee's 7th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tennessee. Tennessee. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Tennessee's 7th congressional district Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Tennessee's 7th congressional district Agri Energy Inc Biofuels America Inc Eco Energy Inc Memphis Biofuels LLC Nashville Electric Service NES Ocean Motion International LLC Solar Pathfinder Universal Lighting Technologies Utility Companies in Tennessee's 7th congressional district City of Memphis, Tennessee (Utility Company) Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Tennessee%27s_7th_congressional_district&oldid=204325" Categories: Places Stubs Congressional Districts What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Browse properties 429 Throttled (bot load)

363

Ohio's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3th congressional district: Energy Resources 3th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Ohio. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Ohio's 13th congressional district FirstEnergy Service Company Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Ohio's 13th congressional district A.J. Rose Manufacturing Company Advanced Hydro Solutions Akrong Machine Services Castle Energy Services Echogen Power Systems, Inc. FirstEnergy Free Energy Alliance Green Energy Technologies Green Energy Technologies LLC GreenField Solar Corp. Jennings The Energy Factory Pier Associates, Inc. Randa Energy Solutions LLC R A Energy Solutions Raymond Plumbing & Heating

364

Texas's 26th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

6th congressional district: Energy Resources 6th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Texas. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 26th congressional district Denton County Electric Cooperative d/b/a CoServ Electric Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 26th congressional district Aecom Government Services AGS American Alternative Energy Systems Caprock Roofing ENTECH Energy Financing Inc Entech Inc Entech Solar Inc formerly WorldWater Solar Technologies ExxonMobil Fluor Corp GreenHunter Energy Inc Higher Power Energy LLC InfiniRel Corporation NatEl Paquin Energy and Fuel Power Generating Inc Shermco Industries Inc Sunluz

365

Validating the Estimated Cost of Saving Water Through Infrastructure Rehabilitation in the Texas Lower Rio Grande Valley (Hidalgo County Irrigation District No. 1)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A Case Study Using Actual Construction Costs for the Curry Main Pipeline Project, Hidalgo County Irrigation District No. 1 (Edinburg)...

Lacewell, R. D.; Rister, M.; Sturdivant, A. W.

366

Monitoring peak power and cooling energy savings of shade trees and white surfaces in the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) service area: Project design and preliminary results  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Urban areas in warm climates create summer heat islands of daily average intensity of 3--5{degrees}C, adding to discomfort and increasing air-conditioning loads. Two important factors contributing to urban heat islands are reductions in albedo (lower overall city reflectance) and loss of vegetation (less evapotranspiration). Reducing summer heat islands by planting vegetation (shade trees) and increasing surface albedos, saves cooling energy, allows down-sizing of air conditioners, lowers air-conditioning peak demand, and reduces the emission of CO{sub 2} and other pollutants from electric power plants. The focus of this multi-year project, jointly sponsored by SMUD and the California Institute for Energy Efficiency (CIEE), was to measure the direct cooling effects of trees and white surfaces (mainly roofs) in a few buildings in Sacramento. The first-year project was to design the experiment and obtain base case data. We also obtained limited post retrofit data for some sites. This report provides an overview of the project activities during the first year at six sites. The measurement period for some of the sites was limited to September and October, which are transitional cooling months in Sacramento and hence the interpretation of results only apply to this period. In one house, recoating the dark roof with a high-albedo coating rendered air conditioning unnecessary for the month of September (possible savings of up to 10 kWh per day and 2 kW of non-coincidental peak power). Savings of 50% relative to an identical base case bungalow were achieved when a school bungalow`s roof and southeast wall were coated with a high-albedo coating during the same period. Our measured data for the vegetation sites do not indicate conclusive results because shade trees were small and the cooling period was almost over. We need to collect more data over a longer cooling season in order to demonstrate savings conclusively.

Akbari, H.; Bretz, S.; Hanford, J.; Rosenfeld, A.; Sailor, D.; Taha, H. [Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (United States); Bos, W. [Sacramento Municipal Utility District, CA (United States)

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

District of Columbia | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

United States » District of Columbia United States » District of Columbia District of Columbia October 16, 2013 Pacific Power - FinAnswer Express Pacific Power's FinAnswer Express Program includes incentives and technical assistance for lighting, HVAC and other equipment upgrades that increase energy efficiency and exceed code requirements in commercial and industrial facilities. Both retrofits of existing equipment and new construction projects are eligible for incentives. For retrofits, the utility may need to verify existing equipment. Prescriptive rebates and custom incentives calculated from energy savings are available. October 16, 2013 Pacific Power - Energy FinAnswer Pacific Power's Energy FinAnswer program provides cash incentives to help its commercial and industrial customers improve their heating, cooling,

368

Pennsylvania's 14th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Pennsylvania's 14th congressional US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Pennsylvania's 14th congressional district 44 Tech Inc. Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Energy Companies in Pennsylvania's 14th congressional district Alcoa BPL Global Enerlogics Networks IBACOS Kurt J Lesker Company PNC Financial Services Plextronics Plextronics Inc Propel IT Inc. Siemens Westinghouse Power Generation SWPG Strategic Energy Sunnyside Ethanol The Penn State Center - Pittsburgh United Oil Company University of Pittsburgh VIPO Energy Resources Inc Walnut Capital Acquisitions Registered Financial Organizations in Pennsylvania's 14th congressional district Sustainable Technology Capital, LP Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Pennsylvania%27s_14th_congressional_district&oldid=198284"

369

New York's 18th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 18th congressional US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 18th congressional district Power Authority of the State of New York Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Energy Companies in New York's 18th congressional district Andlinger Company Inc Business Council of Westchester County (NY) ConEdison Solutions Jasper Energy LLC Malcolm Pirnie Mercury Energy formerly Aquus Energy Mercury Solar Systems Microgy Cogeneration Systems Inc NorthWinds Renewables REgeneration Finance Schott North America Inc Sure Sustainable Renewable Energies - SURE Energy Registered Financial Organizations in New York's 18th congressional district US Renewables Group (New York) Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=New_York%27s_18th_congressional_district&oldid=195981

370

The Forest Preserve District  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Forest Preserve District Forest Preserve District Nature Bulletin No. 109 March 29, 1947 Forest Preserve District of Cook County William N. Erickson, President Roberts Mann, Supt. of Conservation THE FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT Forest Preserve Districts, in Illinois, are separate municipal bodies governed by a Board of Forest Preserve Commissioners consisting of the elected county commissioners, as in Cook County, or by a committee of the county board of supervisors, as in 7 other counties. The legislative act which provided for such a district, if authorized by referendum vote of the people, became a law on July 1, 1914. Under that act, the commissioners are empowered to levy taxes, issue bonds, and to acquire lands containing forests "for the purpose of protecting and preserving the flora, fauna and scenic beauties.... and to restore, restock, protect and preserve the natural forests and said lands with their flora and fauna, as nearly as may be in their natural state and condition for the purpose of the education, pleasure and recreation of the public". A limit of 35,000 acres was set; later increased to 39,000.

371

Pittsburgh LED Street Lighting Research Project Performance Criteria  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A Pittsburgh LED Street Lighting Research Project document on Technical and Aesthetic Performance for Business District LED Lighting.

372

California's 13th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 13th congressional US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in California's 13th congressional district Amber Kinetics, Inc. Smart Grid Demonstration Project Primus Power Corporation Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Networking Organizations in California's 13th congressional district Boots on the Roof Registered Energy Companies in California's 13th congressional district Advanced Power Projects Aurora BioFuels Inc BizLink Technology CalStar Products Catalytic Device International LLC Comverge Crown Renewable Energy LLC Deeya Energy EXAR Corporation Energy Recovery Inc Envia systems Fulcrum Bioenergy Inc Intematix Corporation Leyden Energy formerly known as Mobius Power Makani Power Makani Power Inc Mendel Biotechnology Inc Meridian Energy USA OSIsoft Oorja Protonics Oorja Protonics Inc

373

Pagosa Springs District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Pagosa Springs District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Pagosa Springs District Heating Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location Pagosa Springs, Colorado Coordinates 37.26945°, -107.0097617° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

374

Elko County School District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County School District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal County School District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Elko County School District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Elko County School District Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location Elko, Nevada Coordinates 40.8324211°, -115.7631232° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

375

Inland Navigation Districts and Florida Inland Navigation District Law  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Inland Navigation Districts and Florida Inland Navigation District Inland Navigation Districts and Florida Inland Navigation District Law (Florida) Inland Navigation Districts and Florida Inland Navigation District Law (Florida) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Water Buying & Making Electricity Home Weatherization Program Info State Florida Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) The first part of this legislation establishes Inland Navigation Districts,

376

Warm Springs Water District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Water District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Water District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Warm Springs Water District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Warm Springs Water District Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location Boise, Idaho Coordinates 43.6135002°, -116.2034505° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

377

City of Klamath Falls District Heating District Heating Low Temperature  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

District Heating District Heating Low Temperature District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name City of Klamath Falls District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility City of Klamath Falls District Heating Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location Klamath Falls, Oregon Coordinates 42.224867°, -121.7816704° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

378

Kethcum District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Kethcum District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Kethcum District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Kethcum District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Kethcum District Heating Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location Ketchum, Idaho Coordinates 43.6807402°, -114.3636619° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

379

San Bernardino District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bernardino District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Bernardino District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name San Bernardino District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility San Bernardino District Heating Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location San Bernardino, California Coordinates 34.1083449°, -117.2897652° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

380

Boise City Geothermal District Heating District Heating Low Temperature  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Boise City Geothermal District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Boise City Geothermal District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Boise City Geothermal District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Boise City Geothermal District Heating Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location Boise, Idaho Coordinates 43.6135002°, -116.2034505° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Philip District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Philip District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Philip District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Philip District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Philip District Heating Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location Philip, South Dakota Coordinates 44.0394329°, -101.6651441° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

382

Midland District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Midland District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Midland District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Midland District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Midland District Heating Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location Midland, South Dakota Coordinates 44.0716539°, -101.1554178° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

383

Susanville District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Susanville District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Susanville District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Susanville District Heating District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Susanville District Heating Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location Susanville, California Coordinates 40.4162842°, -120.6530063° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

384

Utah's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Utah. Utah. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Utah's 2nd congressional district Western Electricity Coordinating Council Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Utah's 2nd congressional district Energy & Geoscience Institute Energy & Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah Registered Energy Companies in Utah's 2nd congressional district Amp Resources Blue Source LLC Ciralight Emery Energy Company Eneco Inc EnergySolutions Inc Genifuel Green Joules GreenFire Energy LLC Heliocentric InterContinental Hotels Group Materials and Systems Research MSRI N2Solar Pan Am Biofuels Inc Romeric Solar Unlimited USA Sound Geothermal Corporation Sunton United Energy LLC Tasco Engineering Inc Verdi Energy Group Wasatch Solar Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Utah%27s_2nd_congressional_district&oldid=20529

385

New York's 22nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

York. York. US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in New York's 22nd congressional district New York State Electric & Gas Corporation Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Networking Organizations in New York's 22nd congressional district New York Solar Energy Industries Association The Solar Energy Consortium Registered Energy Companies in New York's 22nd congressional district Cornell Fuel Cell Institute Distributed Generation Technologies DGT LighthouseSolar (New Paltz) NYSEG Novomer Performance Systems Development Precision Flow Technologies Solartech Renewables LLC SunWize Technologies Inc Sunwize Taitem Engineering Taylor Biomass Energy LLC TBE The Solar Energy Consortium TSEC Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=New_York%27s_22nd_congressional_district&oldid=195986

386

Modesto Irrigation District | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jump to: navigation, search Jump to: navigation, search Name Modesto Irrigation District Place Modesto, California Utility Id 12745 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location WECC NERC WECC Yes ISO CA Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Transmission Yes Activity Buying Transmission Yes Activity Distribution Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes Activity Bundled Services Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] SGIC[2] Energy Information Administration Form 826[3] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Modesto Irrigation District Smart Grid Project was awarded $1,493,149 Recovery Act Funding with a total project value of $2,986,298.

387

Truckee Donner Public Utility District - Energy Conservation Rebate Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Public Utility District - Energy Conservation Rebate Public Utility District - Energy Conservation Rebate Program Truckee Donner Public Utility District - Energy Conservation Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Commercial Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Cooling Appliances & Electronics Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Sealing Your Home Ventilation Heat Pumps Commercial Lighting Lighting Water Heating Maximum Rebate Lighting (Residential): see program web site Lighting (Commercial): $10,000 Program Info State California Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Clothes Washers: $100 Refrigerators/Freezers: $100 Dishwashers: $100 Electric Water Heaters: $2/gallon Geothermal Heat Pumps: $200/ton Lighting (Residential): $2/fluorescent bulb Lighting (Commercial): 1/3 of project costs

388

Ortigas Greenways: Demonstrating Innovation in Walkable Districts | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ortigas Greenways: Demonstrating Innovation in Walkable Districts Ortigas Greenways: Demonstrating Innovation in Walkable Districts Jump to: navigation, search Name Ortigas Greenways: Demonstrating Innovation in Walkable Districts Agency/Company /Organization Clean Air Asia, Asian Development Bank (ADB), Ortigas Greenways Project Team, Paulo G. Alcazaren & Associates (PGAA) Partner Asian Development Bank (ADB), Ministry of Planning Sector Land Focus Area People and Policy, Transportation Topics Co-benefits assessment, - Environmental and Biodiversity, Implementation, Low emission development planning, -LEDS, Policies/deployment programs Website http://cleanairinitiative.org/ Program Start 2011 Program End 2012 Country Philippines South-Eastern Asia References Ortigas Greenways[1] Terms of Reference[2] Overview

389

Forestry Policies (District of Columbia)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Forest policy and guidelines in Washington D.C. are focused on urban forestry, and are managed by the District Department of Transportation's Urban Forestry Administration. In 2010 The District...

390

Size quantization effects in atomic level broadening near thin metallic films Macdonald Laboratory, Department of Physics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506-2601  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.R. ¡ Macdonald Laboratory, Department of Physics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506-2601 and Garden Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 P. Ku¨rpick* J.R. ¡ Macdonald Laboratory, Department

Thumm, Uwe

391

Northern Lakes District of MAPLE project  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Wisconsin-Madison Settlement in Vilas and Oneida Counties #12;Seasonally occupied 47% Owner occupied 37

392

ProjectRanking(Economic) USACE District  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

WATERWAY (0081253) TX X 94 Galveston SWD FREEPORT HARBOR (0006170) TX X 95 Galveston SWD TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX (0018130) TX X 101 Galveston SWD MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL (0010810) TX X 115 Galveston SWD TEXAS 2 Galveston SWD HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL (0007780) TX X 13 Galveston SWD GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL

US Army Corps of Engineers

393

Project  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Exploring the Standard Model Exploring the Standard Model       You've heard a lot about the Standard Model and the pieces are hopefully beginning to fall into place. However, even a thorough understanding of the Standard Model is not the end of the story but the beginning. By exploring the structure and details of the Standard Model we encounter new questions. Why do the most fundamental particles have the particular masses we observe? Why aren't they all symmetric? How is the mass of a particle related to the masses of its constituents? Is there any other way of organizing the Standard Model? The activities in this project will elucidate but not answer our questions. The Standard Model tells us how particles behave but not necessarily why they do so. The conversation is only beginning. . . .

394

The Ames Project (1942-1946)  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

The Ames Laboratory was officially founded on May 17, 1947, following development of a process to purify uranium metal for the historic Manhattan Project. From 1942 to 1946, Ames Lab scientists produced over two-million pounds of uranium metal. A U.S. Department of Energy national research laboratory, the Ames Laboratory creates materials and energy solutions. Iowa State University operates Ames Laboratory under contract with the DOE.

None

2013-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

395

California Fleets and Workplace Alternative Fuels Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

information. 2014 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Review Presentation Damian Breen Deputy Air Pollution Control Officer Bay Area Air Quality Management District Project ID: TI035...

396

Texas's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 5th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Texas's 5th congressional district Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 5th congressional district 10Charge Inc 21 Century Solar Inc AEP Wind Energy LLC ASAlliances Biofuels Defunct AT T Inc American Renewable Fuels Biodiesel Investment Group Biomass Energy Resources BroadStar Wind Systems Catalyst Renewables Climate Leaders Joint Venture Continental Biofuels Corporation Digital Gas Inc Distribution Drive ES Alternatives Englehard/ICC Evolution Energy formerly Earth Biofuels Inc FAS Technologies LLC G3 Energy LLC Havoco Wind Energy LLC Hudson Ranch Power I LLC Lighting Science Group Meridian Biorefining Corporation Panda Energy International Inc Southridge Enterprises

397

North Carolina's 8th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

8th congressional 8th congressional district Duke Energy Business Services LLC Smart Grid Project Duke Energy Business Services, LLC Smart Grid Demonstration Project Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in North Carolina's 8th congressional district Abundant Power Bank of America Camstar Systems Inc Celgard LLC Coalogix Inc Dragonfly Capital Duke Power Greenwood Capital Partners MCF Advisors LLC Methane Credit Metso Power National Gypsum NewGen Fuel Technologies Ltd NewGen Technologies Inc Formerly Bongiovi Entertainment Inc Nexxus Lighting Inc Power Sources Inc ReFuel America Rollcast Energy Inc SCR Tech LLC SPX Corporation Sencera International Corporation Sequentric Energy Systems Utility Companies in North Carolina's 8th congressional district Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC

398

North Carolina's 9th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9th congressional 9th congressional district Duke Energy Business Services LLC Smart Grid Project Duke Energy Business Services, LLC Smart Grid Demonstration Project Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in North Carolina's 9th congressional district Abundant Power Applied Energy Management Bank of America Camstar Systems Inc Celgard LLC Coalogix Inc Dragonfly Capital Duke Power Greenwood Capital Partners MCF Advisors LLC Methane Credit Metso Power National Gypsum NewGen Fuel Technologies Ltd NewGen Technologies Inc Formerly Bongiovi Entertainment Inc Nexxus Lighting Inc Power Sources Inc ReFuel America Rollcast Energy Inc SCR Tech LLC SPX Corporation Sencera International Corporation Sequentric Energy Systems Utility Companies in North Carolina's 9th congressional district

399

A Geothermal District-Heating System and Alternative Energy Research Park  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal District-Heating System and Alternative Energy Research Park Geothermal District-Heating System and Alternative Energy Research Park on the NM Tech Campus Geothermal Project Jump to: navigation, search Last modified on July 22, 2011. Project Title A Geothermal District-Heating System and Alternative Energy Research Park on the NM Tech Campus Project Type / Topic 1 Recovery Act: Geothermal Technologies Program Project Type / Topic 2 Geothermal Energy Production from Low Temperature Resources, Coproduced Fluids from Oil and Gas Wells, and Geopressured Resources Project Type / Topic 3 Low Temperature Resources Project Description With prior support from the Department of Energy (GRED III Program), New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (NM Tech) has established that this resource likely has sufficient permeability (3000 Darcies) and temperatures (80-112 oC) to develop a campus-wide district heating system.

400

Elko District Heat District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility |  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Heat District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Heat District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Elko District Heat District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Elko District Heat Sector Geothermal energy Type District Heating Location Elko, Nevada Coordinates 40.8324211°, -115.7631232° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Modesto Irrigation District - Photovoltaic Rebate Program | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Modesto Irrigation District - Photovoltaic Rebate Program Modesto Irrigation District - Photovoltaic Rebate Program Modesto Irrigation District - Photovoltaic Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Local Government Nonprofit Residential State Government Savings Category Solar Buying & Making Electricity Maximum Rebate 50% of total project costs. Program Info State California Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Systems >1 kW to 30 kW: $1.00/W AC. Systems >30 kW to 1 MW: performance-based incentive of $0.10/kWh for 5 years. Provider PV Program Coordinator Modesto Irrigation District offers a photovoltaic rebate program for all of their electric customers. The peak output capacity of a system must be 1 kW or greater to participate. Systems up to 30 kilowatts (kW) in capacity can

402

1District health services research: 2011 District health  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

meDicine anD Primary care, faculty of meDicine anD HealtH sciences, stellenboscH university #12RoDUctIon...................................................................................................................................... clInIcal famIly meDIcIne anD DIstRIct health caRe systems1District health services research: 2011 District health services research: 2011Division of family

Geldenhuys, Jaco

403

Compare All CBECS Activities: District Heat Use  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

District Heat Use District Heat Use Compare Activities by ... District Heat Use Total District Heat Consumption by Building Type Commercial buildings in the U.S. used a total of approximately 433 trillion Btu of district heat (district steam or district hot water) in 1999. There were only five building types with statistically significant district heat consumption; education buildings used the most total district heat. Figure showing total district heat consumption by building type. If you need assistance viewing this page, please call 202-586-8800. District Heat Consumption per Building by Building Type Health care buildings used the most district heat per building. Figure showing district heat consumption per building by building type. If you need assistance viewing this page, please call 202-586-8800.

404

FUSRAP - 45 DOE cleanup projects across the country  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) program designed to address radiological contamination exceeding acceptable cleanup standards at 45 sites throughout the United States. The DOE and its predecessor agencies, the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), used many of these sites for processing and storing uranium and thorium ores as part of the nation`s early nuclear production activities. While some of the sites are owned by the federal government, most of the sites were, and are, privately owned.

Price, L.K. [Dept. of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Harbert, R.R.; Palau, G.L.

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

405

Research District Seeing Growth  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Monthly economic diversity column for the Tri-City Herald (May 2012) - excerpt follows: Its been a while since Ive updated you on the Tri-Cities Research District, most certainly not for lack of new activity over the past several months. In fact, much has happened, and theres more to come. I think many of us see new land development and construction as indicative of current or impending economic growth. So those of you who have ventured into North Richland either via Stevens Drive or George Washington Way lately have probably begun sensing and anticipating that such growth is afoot.

Madison, Alison L.

2012-05-13T23:59:59.000Z

406

Surveys on the distribution and abundance of the Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) in the vicinity of proposed geothermal project subzones in the District of Puna, Hawaii. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 1993 the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) entered into an interagency agreement with the Department of Energy (DOE) to conduct wildlife surveys relative to identifying potential impacts of geothermal resource development on the native biota of the east rift zone of Kilauea volcano in the Puna district on the island of Hawaii. This report presents data on the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat (Hawaiian bat), or opeapea (Lasiurus cinereus semotus), within the proposed Hawaii geothermal subzones. Potential effects of geothermal development on Hawaiian bat populations are also discussed. Surveys were conducted to determine the distribution and abundance of bats throughout the District of Puna. Baseline information was collected to evaluate the status of bats within the study area and to identify important foraging habitats. Little specific data exists in the published literature on the population status and potential limiting factors affecting the Hawaiian bat. A USFWS recovery plan does not exist for this endangered species.

Reynolds, M.; Ritchotte, G.; Dwyer, J.; Viggiano, A.; Nielsen, B.; Jacobi, J.D. [Fish and Wildlife Service, Hawaii National Park, HI (United States). Hawaii Research Station

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Modesto Irrigation District - Commercial New Construction Rebate Program |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Modesto Irrigation District - Commercial New Construction Rebate Modesto Irrigation District - Commercial New Construction Rebate Program Modesto Irrigation District - Commercial New Construction Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Industrial Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Other Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Maximum Rebate 50% of the incremental cost of the project(s) included in the application. The maximum annual payment cap is determined per account, by the applicable MID electric rate schedule: $15,000 (GS-1); $25,000 (P-3); $50,000 (GS-2); $125,000 (GS-TOU); $250,000 (GS-3); $500,000 (IC-25). Program Info Expiration Date 12/15/2013 State California Program Type

408

ProjectRanking(Economic) District Potentially Impacted USACE Navigation Projects  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

;102 Detroit DETROIT RIVER MICHIGAN (0004710) MI 1 X 137 Detroit ST. CLAIR RIVER MICHIGAN (0017300) MI 1 X 152 Detroit ROUGE RIVER MICHIGAN (0015590) MI 1 X 156 Detroit BELLE RIVER, MI (0074197) MI 1 X 161 Detroit CHANNELS IN LAKE ST. CLAIR MICHIGAN (0002940) MI 1 X 170 Detroit CLINTON RIVER, MI (0003490) MI 1 X 193

US Army Corps of Engineers

409

ProjectRanking(Economic) District Potentially Impacted USACE Navigation Projects  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FREEPORT HARBOR (0006170) TX 6 X X X X X X 95 Galveston TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX (0018130) TX 6 X X X X X X 101 Galveston MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL (0010810) TX 6 X X X X X X 115 Galveston TEXAS CITY CHANNEL (0076085) TX 1 X 338 Galveston CHANNEL TO PORT MANSFIELD, TEXAS (0074847) TX 6 X X X X X X 340 Galveston

US Army Corps of Engineers

410

ProjectRanking(Economic) District Potentially Impacted USACE Navigation Projects  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FREEPORT HARBOR (0006170) TX 6 X X X X X X 95 Galveston TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX (0018130) TX 6 X X X X X X 101 Galveston MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL (0010810) TX 6 X X X X X X 115 Galveston TEXAS CITY CHANNEL(PE) Opossumpipefish(SoC) Queenconch(C) Rabbitsfoot(T) Alabamashad(SoC) 17 12 12 17 17 17 2 1 2 Galveston HOUSTON SHIP

US Army Corps of Engineers

411

Public Utility District #1 Of Jefferson County  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Of Jefferson County Board of Commissioners July 2,2008 Dana Roberts, District 1 M. Kelly Hays, District 2 Wayne G. King, District 3 Mark Gendron, Vice President Northwest...

412

Podhale (South Poland) geothermal district heating system  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The search for geothermal resources in the Podhale Region began in the late 1980s. The Banska IG-1 well, drilled in 1981, served as the starting point for an expansion of those research activities. A geothermal pilot plant was put into operation in 1993. During that same year the company Geotermia Podhalanska (GP) was founded and the pilot project, including the first distribution network for 20 customers, was constructed. After the initial phase of project implementation from 1993 to 1995, during which a pilot plant was constructed and put into operation for demonstration purposes by the Polish Academy for Sciences using the first geothermal doublet (a production well in Banska Nizna and a reinjection well in Bialy Dunajec), and connection of 200 households through a small district heating network, the World Bank got involved in the geothermal district heating project. Since then, significant progress has been made, increasing the overall heat capacity and geothermal output as well as the service area to the City of Zakopane, approx. 14 km from the production wells. In November 2001 the first geothermal heat was delivered to customers in Zakopane.

Piotr Dlugosz

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

413

Architecture 2030 District Toolkit- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Cindy Regnier, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory This project aims to create programmatic guidance and a technical toolkit to support the promotion, development, and execution of 2030 District energy efficiency savings programs for small commercial office and retail buildings across the nation.

414

California's 42nd congressional district: Energy Resources |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Scheuten Solar USA Inc US South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD Western Ethanol Company LLC Utility Companies in California's 42nd congressional district City of...

415

Litchfield Correctional Center District Heating Low Temperature...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Correctional Center District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Litchfield Correctional Center District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal...

416

Montana Association of Conservation Districts Webpage | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Districts Webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Montana Association of Conservation Districts Webpage Abstract Homepage of...

417

District Energy Technologies | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

through the centralized system. District energy systems often operate with combined heat and power (CHP) and waste heat recovery technologies. Learn more about district...

418

Community Renewable Energy Success Stories Webinar: District...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

District Heating with Renewable Energy (text version) Community Renewable Energy Success Stories Webinar: District Heating with Renewable Energy (text version) Below is the text...

419

The Sudbury Mining District  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for Digital Scholarship. http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu Submitted to the School of Engineering of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a course in Mining Engineering ran THE SUDBURY MINING DISTRICT. A D i s s e r t a t i o... n P r e s e n t e d t o the F a c u l t y o f the SCHOOL OP ENGINEERING i n the UNIVERSITY OP KANSAS. F o r the Completion o f a Course i n MINING ENGINEERING. fey Prank G. B e d e l l . June 1906. PREFACE I n t h i s paper w i l l be g i...

Bedell, Frank G.

1906-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

ENLACE Mentor Project **.......................................................... Student Affairs  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.............................. .. Engineering and Computer Science 8 8 Project SHINE Grant Programs A guide to Student Enrichment, Pre-Professional and Research Opportunities at CSUF: Students must have graduated from the Santa Ana School District and pursuing higher education. Benefits

de Lijser, Peter

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Financing Energy Upgrades for K-12 School Districts  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Local Option Capital Asset Lending Program (Washington) Local Option Capital Asset Lending Program (Washington) In 2009, Washington's Centralia School District pulled together several sources of funding to make $1.3 million in facilities improvements that reduced the school district's energy and water usage. In addition to a $500,000 state grant and $200,000 in incentives from the utility, Centralia financed much of the project through the state's low-cost Local Option Capital Asset Lending (LOCAL) program, which aggregates lease-purchase financing demand from public entities

422

Public Utility District No 1 of Snohomish County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

District No 1 of Snohomish County District No 1 of Snohomish County Jump to: navigation, search Name Public Utility District No 1 of Snohomish County Address 2320 California Street PO Box 1107 Place Everett Zip 98206 Sector Marine and Hydrokinetic Phone number 425-783-1825 Website http://www.snopud.com Region United States LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This company is listed in the Marine and Hydrokinetic Technology Database. This company is involved in the following MHK Projects: Admirality Inlet Tidal Energy Project Deception Pass Tidal Energy Hydroelectric Project Guemes Channel Tidal Energy Project San Juan Channel Tidal Energy Project Spieden Channel Tidal Energy Project This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Retrieved from

423

Cedarville School District Retrofit of Heating and Cooling Systems with  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

School District Retrofit of Heating and Cooling Systems with School District Retrofit of Heating and Cooling Systems with Geothermal Heat Pumps and Ground Source Water Loops Geothermal Project Jump to: navigation, search Last modified on July 22, 2011. Project Title Cedarville School District Retrofit of Heating and Cooling Systems with Geothermal Heat Pumps and Ground Source Water Loops Project Type / Topic 1 Recovery Act - Geothermal Technologies Program: Ground Source Heat Pumps Project Type / Topic 2 Topic Area 1: Technology Demonstration Projects Project Description - Improve the indoor air quality and lower the cost of cooling and heating the buildings that make up the campus of Cedarville High School, Middle School and Elementary School. - Provide jobs, and reduce requirements of funds for the capital budget of the School District, and thus give relief to taxpayers in this rural region during a period of economic recession. - The new Heat Pumps will be targeted to perform at very high efficiency with EER (energy efficiency ratios) of 22+/-. System capacity is planned at 610 tons. - Remove unusable antiquated existing equipment and systems from the campus heating and cooling system, but utilize ductwork, piping, etc. where feasible. The campus is served by antiquated air conditioning units combined with natural gas, and with very poor EER estimated at 6+/-. - Monitor for 3 years the performance of the new systems compared to benchmarks from the existing system, and provide data to the public to promote adoption of Geothermal technology. - The Geothermal installation contractor is able to provide financing for a significant portion of project funding with payments that fall within the energy savings resulting from the new high efficiency heating and cooling systems.

424

District of Columbia | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2011 6, 2011 16 R&D Projects Across 11 States to Advance Hydropower in U.S. Today, Secretary Chu announced that the Energy Department is funding 16 projects that will make hydropower production even more efficient, cost-effective and environmentally friendly. September 2, 2011 Response to Hurricane Irene - Restoring Power on the East Coast Hurricane Irene struck the East coast last Friday, making landfall in North Carolina. Over the weekend, the storm traveled up the East Coast and into the mid-Atlantic and New England areas of the U.S. In response to Irene, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia declared a State of

425

Groundwater Conservation Districts: Success Stories  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Demand for water is increasing, so our aquifers must be conserved and protected. The Groundwater Conservation Districts in Texas are carrying out a number of successful programs in the areas of education and public awareness, technical assistance...

Porter, Dana; Persyn, Russell A.; Enciso, Juan

1999-09-06T23:59:59.000Z

426

Texas's 24th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

24th congressional district 24th congressional district Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 24th congressional district 10Charge Inc AEP Wind Energy LLC ASAlliances Biofuels Defunct AT T Inc Aecom Government Services AGS American Renewable Fuels Applied Optical Systems Biodiesel Investment Group Biomass Energy Resources BroadStar Wind Systems Caprock Roofing Catalyst Renewables Climate Leaders Joint Venture Continental Biofuels Corporation Demilec Digital Gas Inc Distribution Drive DistributionDrive ENTECH ES Alternatives Energy Financing Inc Englehard/ICC Entech Solar Inc formerly WorldWater Solar Technologies Evolution Energy formerly Earth Biofuels Inc ExxonMobil FAS Technologies LLC Fluor Corp G3 Energy LLC GreenHunter Energy Inc

427

Omaha Public Power District - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Omaha Public Power District - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Omaha Public Power District - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs Omaha Public Power District - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs < Back Eligibility Commercial Industrial Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Maximum Rebate Lighting: $20,000 or up to 20% of cost Program Info State Nebraska Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Fluorescent Lighting: $5 - $32/fixture High Intensity Discharge Lighting: $5 - $75/unit Exit Sign: $5/unit LED Lighting: $6 - $55/unit Incandescent: $4 - $8 Lamp Upgrade: $1 - $1.50/unit Custom Lighting Measures: Contact Utility Heat Pump: $50/nominal ton Innovative Energy Efficiency Project: 50% of study cost and $400/kW of peak

428

Minnesota's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Policy Organizations in Minnesota's 5th congressional district Policy Organizations in Minnesota's 5th congressional district Windustry Registered Energy Companies in Minnesota's 5th congressional district Advanced Bioenergy LLC Best Buy Best Power International LLC Bison Renewable Energy LLC Clear Wind Renewable Power Delphi Financial Corporation Deltak LLC Despatch Industries EcoSystem Corporation Emerald Renewable Energy FC3 Group FreEner-g Freener g Genmar Holdings Inc Great Plains Institute Honor the Earth International Green Power IGP MagStar Technologies NRG Thermal LLC National Wind National Wind Assessments formerly Romuld Wind Consulting Natural Resource Group Navitas Energy Inc Project Resources Corporation Ryan Companies U.S. Sunnyside Technologies Inc Superior Process Technology Inc Target The Center for Energy and the Environment

429

Texas's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

rd congressional district rd congressional district Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 3rd congressional district 10Charge Inc 1Soltech Inc 21 Century Solar Inc 21-Century Silicon, Inc. AEP Wind Energy LLC ASAlliances Biofuels Defunct AT T Inc American Renewable Fuels Applied Optical Systems Biodiesel Investment Group Biomass Energy Resources BroadStar Wind Systems Catalyst Renewables Climate Leaders Joint Venture Consolidated Biofuels Inc Continental Biofuels Corporation Digital Gas Inc Distribution Drive ES Alternatives Englehard/ICC Evolution Energy formerly Earth Biofuels Inc FAS Technologies LLC G3 Energy LLC Havoco Wind Energy LLC Hudson Ranch Power I LLC InfiniRel Corporation Lighting Science Group Meridian Biorefining Corporation

430

Texas's 30th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

0th congressional district 0th congressional district Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC Smart Grid Demonstration Project Registered Energy Companies in Texas's 30th congressional district 10Charge Inc AEP Wind Energy LLC ASAlliances Biofuels Defunct AT T Inc American Renewable Fuels Biodiesel Investment Group Biomass Energy Resources BroadStar Wind Systems Catalyst Renewables Climate Leaders Joint Venture Continental Biofuels Corporation Digital Gas Inc Distribution Drive ES Alternatives Englehard/ICC Evolution Energy formerly Earth Biofuels Inc FAS Technologies LLC G3 Energy LLC Havoco Wind Energy LLC Hudson Ranch Power I LLC Lighting Science Group Meridian Biorefining Corporation Panda Energy International Inc Southridge Enterprises Southridge Ethanol SunFuel Midstream Tang Group Energy Ltd The Marc Group

431

Review of Prior Commercial Building Energy Efficiency Retrofit Evaluation: A Report to Snohomish Public Utilities District  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Snohomish County Public Utilities District (the District or Snohomish PUD) provides electricity to about 325,000 customers in Snohomish County, Washington. The District has an incentive programs to encourage commercial customers to improve energy efficiency: the District partially reimburses the cost of approved retrofits if they provide a level of energy performance improvement that is specified by contract. In 2013 the District contracted with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory to provide a third-party review of the Monitoring and Verification (M&V) practices the District uses to evaluate whether companies are meeting their contractual obligations. This work helps LBNL understand the challenges faced by real-world practitioners of M&V of energy savings, and builds on a body of related work such as Price et al. (2013). The District selected a typical project for which they had already performed an evaluation. The present report includes the District's original evaluation as well as LBNL's review of their approach. The review is based on the document itself; on investigation of the load data and outdoor air temperature data from the building evaluated in the document; and on phone discussions with Bill Harris of the Snohomish County Public Utilities District. We will call the building studied in the document the subject building, the original Snohomish PUD report will be referred to as the Evaluation, and this discussion by LBNL is called the Review.

Price, Phillip

2014-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

432

District cooling and heating development in Stamford, CT. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the development options for introducing district cooling and heating in downtown Stamford, Connecticut. A district energy system as defined for the Stamford project is the production of chilled and hot water at a central energy plant, and its distribution underground to participating building in the vicinity. The objective of the study was to investigate implementation of a district energy system in conjunction with cogeneration as a means to encourage energy conservation and provide the city with an economic development tool. Analysis of the system configuration focused on selecting an arrangement which offered a realistic opportunity for implementation. Three main alternatives were investigated: (1) construction of an 82 MW cogeneration plant and a district heating and cooling system to serve downtown buildings, (2) construction of a small (4 MW) in-fence cogeneration plant combined with cooling and heating, and (3) construction of a district cooling and heating plant to supply selected buildings. Option (1) was determined to be unfeasible at this time due to low electricity prices. The analysis demonstrated that alternatives (2) and (3) were feasible. A number of recommendations are made for detailed cost estimates and ownership, leasing, and financial issues. 12 figs., 10 tabs.

NONE

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

433

Feasibility analysis of geothermal district heating for Lakeview, Oregon  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An analysis of the geothermal resource at Lakeview, Oregon, indicates that a substantial resource exists in the area capable of supporting extensive residential, commercial and industrial heat loads. Good resource productivity is expected with water temperatures of 200{degrees}F at depths of 600 to 3000 feet in the immediate vicinity of the town. Preliminary district heating system designs were developed for a Base Case serving 1170 homes, 119 commercial and municipal buildings, and a new alcohol fuel production facility; a second design was prepared for a downtown Mini-district case with 50 commercial users and the alcohol plant. Capital and operating costs were determined for both cases. Initial development of the Lakeview system has involved conducting user surveys, well tests, determinations of institutional requirements, system designs, and project feasibility analyses. A preferred approach for development will be to establish the downtown Mini-district and, as experience and acceptance are obtained, to expand the system to other areas of town. Projected energy costs for the Mini-district are $10.30 per million Btu while those for the larger Base Case design are $8.20 per million Btu. These costs are competitive with costs for existing sources of energy in the Lakeview area.

Not Available

1980-12-23T23:59:59.000Z

434

Building Energy Code for the District of Columbia | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Building Energy Code for the District of Columbia Building Energy Code for the District of Columbia Building Energy Code for the District of Columbia < Back Eligibility Commercial Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Building Energy Code Provider District Department of the Environment ''Much of the information presented in this summary is drawn from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program and the Building Codes Assistance Project (BCAP). For more detailed information about building energy codes, visit the [http://www.energycodes.gov/states/ DOE] and [http://bcap-ocean.org/ BCAP] websites.'' The DC Energy Conservation Code is updated regularly as national codes are

435

Modular approach for modelling a multi-energy district boiler Julien Eynard, Stphane Grieu1 and Monique Polit  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Modular approach for modelling a multi-energy district boiler Julien Eynard, Stéphane Grieu1 with the modelling of a district boiler (city of La Rochelle, west coast of France), as part of the OptiEnR research project. This "multi- energy" boiler supplies domestic hot water and heats residential and public

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

436

International District Energy Association | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

International District Energy Association International District Energy Association International District Energy Association November 1, 2013 - 11:40am Addthis International District Energy Association logo Since its formation in 1909, the International District Energy Association (IDEA) has served as a principal industry advocate and management resource for owners, operators, developers, and suppliers of district heating and cooling systems in cities, campuses, bases, and healthcare facilities. Today, with over 1,400 members in 26 countries, IDEA continues to organize high-quality technical conferences that inform, connect, and advance the industry toward higher energy efficiency and lower carbon emissions through innovation and investment in scalable sustainable solutions. With the support of DOE, IDEA

437

Evaluating Water Transfers in Irrigation Districts  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The participation of irrigation districts (IDs) in surface water transfers from agriculture-to-municipal uses is studied by examining IDs economic and political behavior, comparing their performance with non-districts (non-IDs), and analyzing...

Ghimire, Narishwar

2013-04-11T23:59:59.000Z

438

NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT: CUSTOMER MEETING ON ENERGY ALTERNATIVES - SUMMARY OF RESULTS  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT CUSTOMER MEETING ON ENERGY ALTERNATIVES SUMMARY OF RESULTS August 19, 2003 Prepared by: The Public Decision Partnership: Will Guild, Ph.D. Ron Lehr Dennis Thomas, Ph.D. i Table of Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................1 Summary of the Process....................................................................................................5 Contact persons ..................................................................................................................8 Response to Proposed Projects .........................................................................................9 Do you think NPPD should go forward with a 200 megawatt wind farm?

439

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PITTSBURGH DISTRICT 1000 LIBERTY AVENUE, 22  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ­ PITTSBURGH DISTRICT 1000 LIBERTY AVENUE, 22 ND FLOOR, PITTSBURGH, PA 15222 WWW.LRP.USACE.ARMY.MIL Corps of Engineers to Continue Leading Clean-up of SLDA Project PITTSBURGH to lead the Shallow Land Disposal Area (SLDA) radioactive waste clean-up project in Parks Township, Pa

US Army Corps of Engineers

440

Vacant District Chair Positions (as of 1/28/2014)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) District 83 ­ Kings County (Visalia) District 84 ­ Tulare County (Porterville) REGION 12: INLAND EMPIRE: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA District 10/11 ­ Siskiyou County, Humboldt & Eureka Counties District 13 ­ Modoc, Lassen, Plumas Counties District 15 ­ Yuba & Sutter Counties District 16 ­ Tri-County Area (includes Red

Cohen, Ronald C.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Project Project HQ City HQ State ARRA Funding Total Value Additional  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Burbank Water and Power Burbank Water and Power Smart Grid Project Burbank California Central Lincoln People s Utility District Smart Grid Project Central Lincoln People s Utility District Smart Grid Project Newport Oregon City of Anaheim Smart Grid Project City of Anaheim Smart Grid Project Anaheim California City of Auburn IN Smart Grid Project City of Auburn IN Smart Grid Project Auburn Indiana City of Fort Collins Utilities Smart Grid Project City of Fort Collins Utilities Smart Grid Project Fort Collins Colorado City of Leesburg Florida Smart Grid Project City of Leesburg Florida Smart Grid Project Leesburg Florida City of Naperville Illinois Smart Grid Project City of Naperville Illinois Smart Grid Project Naperville Illinois City of Wadsworth OH Smart Grid Project City of Wadsworth OH Smart

442

PROPOSAL FOR BIOCOMPLEXITY EDUCATION PROJECT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to develop curriculum and facilitate cross- cultural teaching strategies for natural resource management, population growth, resource management, recreation, policy, etc. BTWF & Thompson School District will include at http://biocomplexity.cnr.colostate.edu/project_desc.htm. Approach: The Project plans to partner

443

Operations Cost Allocation Project  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Operations Consolidation Project Operations Consolidation Project Operations Consolidation Project (OCP) Cost Allocation Presentation - September 20, 2011 OCP Cost Allocation Customer Presentation List of Acronyms OCP Cost Allocation Spreadsheets OCP Cost Allocation Customer Presentation - Questions and Answers - September 19 - 20, 2011 Additional Questions and Answers Customer Comments/Questions and Answers: Arizona Municipal Power Users Association Arizona Power Authority Central Arizona Project Colorado River Commission Colorado River Energy Distributors Association City of Gilbert, AZ Irrigation and Electrical Districts Association of Arizona Town of Marana, AZ City of Mesa, AZ Town of Wickenburg, AZ Western's Final Decision Regarding the Long-Term Cost Allocation Methodology for Operations Staff Costs

444

Economic Improvement Districts (Indiana) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Improvement Districts (Indiana) Improvement Districts (Indiana) Economic Improvement Districts (Indiana) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fuel Distributor Industrial Installer/Contractor Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Municipal/Public Utility Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Indiana Program Type Bond Program Industry Recruitment/Support Provider Indiana Economic Development Corporation A legislative body may adopt an ordinance establishing an economic improvement district and an Economic Improvement Board to manage development in a respective district. The Board can choose to issue revenue

445

Empire District Electric - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Empire District Electric - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Empire District Electric - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Empire District Electric - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate < Back Eligibility Construction Multi-Family Residential Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Sealing Your Home Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Cooling Appliances & Electronics Construction Design & Remodeling Other Ventilation Water Heating Windows, Doors, & Skylights Program Info State Missouri Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount ENERGY STAR Home Performance Retrofit: 400 ENERGY STAR Qualified Home Designation: 800 Air Conditioner: 400 - 500; varies depending on SEER rating Provider Empire District Electric Company The Empire District Electric Company offers rebates for customers who

446

Geothermal district heating in Turkey: The Gonen case study  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The status of geothermal district heating in Turkey and its future prospects are reviewed. A description is given of the Gonen project in Balikesir province, the first system to begin citywide operation in the country. The geology and geothermal resources of the area, the history of the project's development, the problems encountered, its economic aspects and environmental contributions are all discussed. The results of this and other such systems installed in Turkey have confirmed that, in this country, heating an entire city based on geothermal energy is a significantly cleaner, cheaper option than using fossil fuels or other renewable energy resources.

Zuhal Oktay; Asiye Aslan

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

District of Columbia County, District of Columbia: Energy Resources | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Columbia County, District of Columbia: Energy Resources Columbia County, District of Columbia: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 38.9059849°, -77.0334179° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.9059849,"lon":-77.0334179,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

448

BLM Winnemucca District Office | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

BLM Winnemucca District Office BLM Winnemucca District Office Jump to: navigation, search Name BLM Winnemucca District Office Short Name Winnemucca Parent Organization BLM Nevada State Office Address 5100 E. Winnemucca Blvd. Place Winnemucca, Nevada Zip 89445 Phone number 775-623-1500 Website http://www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo References Winnemucca District Office website[1] Divisions Place BLM Humboldt River Field Office Winnemucca, Nevada This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. BLM Winnemucca District Office is an organization based in Winnemucca, Nevada. References ↑ "Winnemucca District Office website" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=BLM_Winnemucca_District_Office&oldid=640908" Categories: Government Agencies Stubs

449

District of Columbia | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

United States » District of Columbia United States » District of Columbia District of Columbia October 16, 2013 Vera Irrigation District #15 - Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Vera Irrigation District #15 offers rebates to electric customers who improve energy efficiency. Rebates are available for water heaters, windows, heat pumps, clothes washer, duct sealing and appliance recycling. Certain efficiency standards must be met in order to receive a rebate for water heaters or windows. Vera Irrigation District also provides a $450 rebate for the installation of energy-efficient heat pumps; ductless heat pumps are eligible incentives of up to $1,500. See the program web site or contact the utility for more information about this program. October 16, 2013 Underground Storage Tank Management (District of Columbia)

450

Central Oregon Irrigation District | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Oregon Irrigation District Oregon Irrigation District Jump to: navigation, search Name Central Oregon Irrigation District Place Redmond, Oregon Zip 97756 Sector Hydro Product Corporation of the State of Oregon that provides municipal, industrial, and agricultural water, as well as hydropower, for central Oregon. References Central Oregon Irrigation District[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Central Oregon Irrigation District is a company located in Redmond, Oregon . References ↑ "Central Oregon Irrigation District" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Oregon_Irrigation_District&oldid=343383" Categories: Clean Energy Organizations

451

Kenston School District | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Kenston School District Kenston School District Jump to: navigation, search Name Kenston School District Facility Kenston School District Sector Wind energy Facility Type Community Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Kenston School District Developer Kenston School District Energy Purchaser Kenston School District Location Chagrin Falls OH Coordinates 41.39386574°, -81.30529761° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":41.39386574,"lon":-81.30529761,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

452

California's 15th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

5th congressional district 5th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in California's 15th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in California's 15th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in California's 15th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in California's 15th congressional district Registered Research Institutions in California's 15th congressional district Environmental Business Cluster Registered Networking Organizations in California's 15th congressional district MetaMatrix Groupe Registered Policy Organizations in California's 15th congressional district Silicon Valley Clean Tech Alliance Solar San Jose Registered Energy Companies in California's 15th congressional district AE Biofuels Inc formerly American Ethanol Inc

453

Project ELLA: English Language and Literacy Acquisition  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PORTE ISD GOOSE CREEK ISD CLEAR CREEK ISD PASADENA ISD HUMBLE ISD HUFFMAN ISD CROSBY ISD Houston Texas CONTEXT OF THE STUDY Aldine ISD is a Learning First Alliance District and a Two-time Broad Finalist GOALS FOR PROJECT ELLA... PORTE ISD GOOSE CREEK ISD CLEAR CREEK ISD PASADENA ISD HUMBLE ISD HUFFMAN ISD CROSBY ISD Houston Texas CONTEXT OF THE STUDY Aldine ISD is a Learning First Alliance District and a Two-time Broad Finalist GOALS FOR PROJECT ELLA...

Lara-Alecio, Rafael; Irby, Beverly J.; Mathes, Patricia G.

2010-10-11T23:59:59.000Z

454

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

33-1 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA 33-2 2. Imperial Beach, Silver Strand Shoreline, CA 33-2 3. LA-LB Harbors (LA Harbor), CA 33-2 4. Los Angeles Harbor Main Channel Deepen, CA 33-2 5. Marina Del Rey, CA 33-3 6. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 33-3 7. Newport

US Army Corps of Engineers

455

Comprehensive list of Danish lit-erature and R&D projects  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in district heating networks July 2007 Klaus Ellehauge Thomas Engberg Pedersen Ellehauge & Kildemoes storages in district heating networks ANNEX 5/34 Ellehauge & Kildemoes, COWI A/S Preface 6 1 Literature 7 2 Projects carried out in Denmark 14 3 Danish companies 31 #12;6/34 Solar heat storages in district heating

456

FIA-12-0004 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District 4 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance FIA-12-0004 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance The Office of Hearings and Appeals issued one Decision relating to two appeals filed by California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance (CANDO) from two determination letters issued by the Loan Guarantee Program Office (LGPO) of the Department of Energy (DOE) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). CANDO filed requests for information in which it sought copies of specified documents related to loan guarantee contracts for the Gila Bend (Case No. FIA-12-0004) and Agua Caliente (Case No.FIA-12-0005) Solar Energy Projects. In determination letters issued on

457

FIA-12-0005 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District 5 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance FIA-12-0005 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance The Office of Hearings and Appeals issued one Decision relating to two appeals filed by California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance (CANDO) from two determination letters issued by the Loan Guarantee Program Office (LGPO) of the Department of Energy (DOE) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). CANDO filed requests for information in which it sought copies of specified documents related to loan guarantee contracts for the Gila Bend (Case No. FIA-12-0004) and Agua Caliente (Case No.FIA-12-0005) Solar Energy Projects. In determination letters issued on

458

Energy Sources and Systems Analysis: 40 South Lincoln Redevelopment District (Full Report)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results of a case study to analyze district energy systems for their potential use in a project that involves redeveloping 270 units of existing public housing, along with other nearby sites. When complete, the redevelopment project will encompass more than 900 mixed-income residential units, commercial and retail properties, and open space. The analysis estimated the hourly heating, cooling, domestic hot water, and electric loads required by the community; investigated potential district system technologies to meet those needs; and researched available fuel sources to power such systems.

Not Available

2011-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

459

Solar Schools Assessment and Implementation Project: Financing Options on Solar Installations on K-12 Schools  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

This report focuses on financial options developed specifically for renewable energy and energy efficiency projects in three California public school districts.

460

RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Project and Cold War Era Historic District Treatment Plan" (DOERL-97-56); the "Cultural Resources Management Plan" (DOERL-98-10), and other applicable guidance documents and...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "district manhattan project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


First Page Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11