Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

DOE Superconductivity Program Stakeholders | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Stakeholders Map showing the stakeholders involved in High Temperature Superconductivity work with the DOE. DOE Superconductivity Program Stakeholders More Documents &...

2

Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA DOE Offices are encouraged to be inclusive in providing potentially interested parties with opportunities to review NEPA documents. This Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA is primarily intended to supplement lists that Departmental Offices compile for individual projects or facilities. It complements the EIS Distribution Guidance. The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance updates this Directory annually in July and may issue revisions throughout the year as new information becomes available. NEPAStakeholdersDirectory_10_29_13.pdf More Documents & Publications Diversity Employment and Recruitment Sources

3

U.S. DOE Turbine Program Stakeholder Road Mapping Session  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

U.S. DOE Turbine Program Stakeholder Road Mapping Session U.S. DOE Turbine Program Stakeholder Road Mapping Session July 29-30, 2003 Table of Contents Disclaimer Papers and Presentations Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government or any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

4

2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Issued  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA 2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Issued 2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Issued July 31, 2013 - 5:02pm Addthis 2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Issued The Stakeholder Directory, now in its 30th edition, identifies contacts in federal agencies; states, territories, and state government associations; and nongovernmental organizations for reviewing environmental impact statements and environmental assessments, and for other NEPA public involvement and consultation activities. The Directory is primarily intended to supplement lists that Departmental Offices compile for individual projects or facilities. Addthis Related Articles Obama Officials Announce Steps to Promote the Clean Energy Potential of the

5

2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Issued  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA 2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Issued 2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Issued July 31, 2013 - 5:02pm Addthis 2013 Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Issued The Stakeholder Directory, now in its 30th edition, identifies contacts in federal agencies; states, territories, and state government associations; and nongovernmental organizations for reviewing environmental impact statements and environmental assessments, and for other NEPA public involvement and consultation activities. The Directory is primarily intended to supplement lists that Departmental Offices compile for individual projects or facilities. Addthis Related Articles Secretary Chu Announces Efforts to Strengthen U.S. Electric Transmission

6

DOE Commercial Building Energy Asset Rating Program Focus Groups with Primary Stakeholders in Seattle -- Final Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Commercial Building Commercial Building Energy Asset Rating Program Focus Groups with Primary Stakeholders in Seattle Final Report G Redmond Wolf J Dohack LD Winges Battelle Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation Seattle, Washington Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Washington, D.C. February 2012 DOE Commercial Building Energy Asset Rating Program Focus Groups with Primary Stakeholders in Seattle Final Report G Redmond Wolf J Dohack LD Winges Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation Seattle, Washington Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Washington, D.C. February 2012 Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1

7

National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Transportation Stakeholders Forum...

8

Project X Broader Impacts  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Part-3 of "Project X: Accelerator Reference Design, Physics Opportunities, Broader Impacts". The proposed Project X proton accelerator at Fermilab, with multi-MW beam power and highly versatile beam formatting, will be a unique world-class facility to explore particle physics at the intensity frontier. Concurrently, however, it can also facilitate important scientific research beyond traditional particle physics and provide unprecedented opportunities in applications to problems of great national importance in the nuclear energy and security sector.

Asner, D M; Henderson, S; Plunkett, R; Wootan, D W; Peterson, M A; Senor, D; Tschirhart, R; Grasselino, A; Romanenko, A; MacDougall, G; Heffner, R H

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

Stakeholder Relations | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Stakeholder Relations Stakeholder Relations Stakeholder Relations Site tours, like this one near Rifle, Colorado, allow stakeholders to learn more about LM projects. Site tours, like this one near Rifle, Colorado, allow stakeholders to learn more about LM projects. Public meetings give stakeholders an opportunity to gain information about DOE and LM activities. This public meeting was held in Riverton, Wyoming. Public meetings give stakeholders an opportunity to gain information about DOE and LM activities. This public meeting was held in Riverton, Wyoming. Site tours, like this one near Rifle, Colorado, allow stakeholders to learn more about LM projects. Public meetings give stakeholders an opportunity to gain information about DOE and LM activities. This public meeting was held in Riverton, Wyoming.

10

Building Technologies Office: Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholde...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Stakeholder's Meeting - Spring 2011 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Building America program held the Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder's Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia,...

11

NEPA Stakeholders Directory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Policy Act N E P A DIRECTORY of POTENTIAL STAKEHOLDERS for DOE ACTIONS under NEPA 28 th Edition July 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE: July 28, 201 1 REPLY TO ATN OF: Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (C. Chen, GC-54,202-586-0733) SUBJECT: Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA: 2gth Edition TO: DOE NEPA Community I am pleased to announce that the 2sth edition of the Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA, dated July 20 1 1, is now posted on the DOE NEPA website (http://ne-pa. enerm. gov/documents/StakeholdersDirectory. pdfl. The Directory is intended to supplement distribution lists that DOE Offices compile for particular projects or facilities

12

DOE Convenes Multi-stakeholder Process to Address Privacy for Data Enabled by Smart Grid Technologies  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE's Office of Electricy Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) issued a notice of an open meeting on Tuesday, February 26, 2013 (9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. ET) of the smart grid data privacy multi...

13

Memorandum, Broader Consensual Listening | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Broader Consensual Listening Broader Consensual Listening Memorandum, Broader Consensual Listening July 20, 2011 Broader Consensual Listening Memo; outlines the procedures to be followed when consensual listening is appropriate. The Federal Information Resources Management Regulations, 41 CFR 201-21.603, set forth the limited circumstances under which agencies were authorized to engage in consensual listening. Consistent with these regulations, the Department adopted consensual listening procedures and codified them in Department of Energy (DOE) Order 1450.4, Consensual Listening-In To or Recording Telephone/Radio Conversations. Under those procedures, the Office ofthe Chieflnformation Officer (OCIO) reviewed and approved consensual listening plans and procedures at field sites. Recently, 41 CFR 201-21.603 was rescinded. Based in part on this

14

DOE Superconductivity Program Stakeholders  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Air Force Research Laboratory Air Force Research Laboratory Air Liquide Air Products and Chemicals Inc. American Electric Power American Superconductor Argonne National Laboratory BOC Group Brookhaven National Laboratory Composite Technology Development Consolidated Edison Cryo-Industries of America Inc. Delta Star Inc. Directed Vapor Technologies Department of Defense Department of Homeland Security Electric Power Research Institute Entergy Florida State University Long Island Power Authority Los Alamos National Laboratory Metal Oxide Technologies Inc. Mipox International Corp. National Grid National Institute for Standards & Tech. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Nissan Electric Co. Ltd. Nexans nkt Cables Group Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oxford Superconducting Technology Pacific Gas and Electric

15

NERSC Stakeholders  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NERSC Allocation Managers at DOE Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) DOE Phonebook Advisory Groups NERSC Users Group The NERSC Users Group (NUG) provides...

16

OSTI Establishes OAI Server, Achieves Broader Exposure for Records | OSTI,  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Establishes OAI Server, Achieves Broader Exposure for Records Establishes OAI Server, Achieves Broader Exposure for Records June 2005 Oak Ridge, TN - OSTI is pleased to announce the establishment of an Open Archives Initiative (OAI) server, which immediately opened more than 108,000 DOE scientific and technical reports for harvesting by the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) and other OAI users. Establishment of an OAI server achieves broader exposure of searchable science through OSTI's suite of R&D databases. By becoming a data provider adopting the OAI technical framework, OSTI took another step toward easing access and search of the deep Web. This is in keeping with OSTI's mission to advance science and sustain technological creativity by making R&D findings available and useful to DOE researchers and the American people.

17

Building Technologies Office: Engaging Stakeholders  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Engaging Stakeholders on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Engaging Stakeholders on Delicious Rank...

18

Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting - Spring 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting - Spring 2012 Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting - Spring 2012 Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting - Spring 2012 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Building America program held the second annual Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting on February 29-March 2, 2012, in Austin, Texas. At this meeting, hundreds of building industry professionals came together to share their perspective on the most current innovation projects in the residential buildings sector. This meeting provided an opportunity for researchers and industry stakeholders to showcase and discuss the latest in cutting-edge, energy-efficient residential building technologies and practices. The meeting also included working sessions from each Standing Technical Committee (STC), which outlined work that will best assist in overcoming

19

2012 Independent Communication and Outreach Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Independent Communication and Outreach Stakeholder 2 Independent Communication and Outreach Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey 2012 Independent Communication and Outreach Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey DOE-LM periodically surveys its stakeholders to collect their feedback on DOE-LM performance at both a local and national level. The first customer satisfaction survey was conducted in 2005 and focused primarily on DOE-LM's "business lines": records management; site management; personal/real property; and transition management. In 2012, LM updated and expanded on that survey by conducting a communications and outreach stakeholder satisfaction survey to gauge the effectiveness of DOE-LM's communication and outreach strategies. Independent Communication and Outreach Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey More Documents & Publications

20

Hanford stakeholder participation in evaluating innovative technologies: VOC product line, Passive soil vapor extraction using borehole flux tunable hybrid plasma  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A three-phased stakeholder participation program was conducted to support the Volatile Organic Compounds Arid Site Integrated Demonstration (VOC-Arid ID). The US DOE`s Office of Technology Development (OTD) sponsored and directed the VOC-Arid ID. Its purpose was to develop and demonstrate new technologies for remediating VOC contamination in soil and ground water. The integrated demonstration, hosted by the Hanford site in Washington State, is being transitioned into the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Plume Focus Area. The Plume Focus Area has the same basic objectives as the ID, but is broader in scope and is a team effort with technology developers and technology users. The objective is to demonstrate a promising technology once, and if results warrant deploy it broadly across the DOE complex and in private sector applications.

Peterson, T.; McCabe, G.; Niesen, K.; Serie, P.

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Spring 2013 National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Meeting...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Spring 2013 National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Meeting, New York Spring 2013 National Transportation Stakeholders Forum...

22

Building Technologies Office: Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting - Spring 2012 Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting - Spring 2012 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Building America program held the second annual Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting on February 29-March 2, 2012, in Austin, Texas. At this meeting, hundreds of building industry professionals came together to share their perspective on the most current innovation projects in the residential buildings sector. This meeting provided an opportunity for researchers and industry stakeholders to showcase and discuss the latest in cutting-edge, energy-efficient residential building technologies and practices. The meeting also included working sessions from each Standing Technical Committee (STC), which outlined work that will best assist in overcoming technical challenges and delivering Building America research results to the market. Learn more about the STCs and the research planning process.

23

Buried Waste Integrated Demonstration stakeholder involvement model  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Buried Waste Integrated Demonstration (BWID) is a program funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Technology Development. BWID supports the applied research, development, demonstration, and evaluation of a suite of advanced technologies that together form a comprehensive remediation system for the effective and efficient remediation of buried waste. Stakeholder participation in the DOE Environmental Management decision-making process is critical to remediation efforts. Appropriate mechanisms for communication with the public, private sector, regulators, elected officials, and others are being aggressively pursued by BWID to permit informed participation. This document summarizes public outreach efforts during FY-93 and presents a strategy for expanded stakeholder involvement during FY-94.

Kaupanger, R.M.; Kostelnik, K.M.; Milam, L.M.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

24

FUSRAP Stakeholder Report_3.cdr  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FUSRAP FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Stakeholder Report May 2013 ENERGY Legacy Management U.S. DEPARTMENT OF The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has operated the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) since 1974. During that time, we have accomplished many activities to identify and remediate to a safe condition sites that became contaminated with radioactive materials in support of the nation's early atomic energy programs. DOE is responsible for 30 remediated FUSRAP sites (see the map on the next page). Our mission is to keep these sites protective of human health and the environment.To accomplish this, DOE has evaluated risk for the sites and defined long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) requirements to monitor site

25

National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) Charter | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Waste Management » Packaging and Transportation » Services » Waste Management » Packaging and Transportation » National Transportation Stakeholders Forum » National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) Charter National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) Charter The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) is the mechanism through which DOE engages at a national level with states, tribes, federal agencies and other interested stakeholders about the Department's shipments of radioactive waste and materials, as well as occasional high- visibility shipments that are nonradioactive. The purpose of the NTSF is to bring transparency, openness, and accountability to DOE's offsite transportation activities through collaboration with state and tribal governments. DOE will work through existing agreements and

26

National Transportation Stakeholders Forum  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transportation Stakeholders Forum Transportation Stakeholders Forum May 14-16, 2013 Tuesday, May 14 7:00 am - 5:00 pm Registration Niagara Foyer 7:00 am - 7:45 am Breakfast and Networking Grand A 8:00 am - 10:00 am National Updates for Transportation Stakeholder Groups and Guests - Panel Grand BC Moderator: John Giarrusso Jr., MA Emergency Management Agency / Northeast High-Level Radioactive Waste Transportation Task Force Co-Chair US Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management - Steve O'Connor, Director, Office of Packaging & Transportation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Earl P. Easton, Senior Level Advisor (retired) and David W. Pstrak, Transportation and Storage Specialist, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation

27

Connecting Stakeholders, Achieving Green  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

If Green is gold, why is progress so slow? The public understanding of Green is evolving. Standards are being developed, but there is still much work to be done. Achieving Green is difficult. Necessary conditions include: A plan that is realistic and sustainable; Partnership that share the efforts and benefits of Green results; and A continuous improvement process, i.e. the flexibility to evolve with a dynamic industry and market. A successful Green plan combines vision, initiative, and a willingness to invest in the right tools. To implement a successful plan, leaders have recognized that, in light of the barriers that exist, real progress cannot be made alone. Because of common interest, core stakeholders are natural and necessary allies. As the public acceptance of Green increases, core stakeholders are challenging the status quo. Consequently, stakeholders are not risking inaction, and are connecting to achieve the rewards of being Green.

Rouse, S.; Nolan, B.

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

28

Energy-Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy-Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's 2010 Energy-Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's 2010 Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review Energy-Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's 2010 Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review The Department of Energy conducted a Peer Review of its Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) Research and Development Program on July 20-22, 2010 during which 28 R&D projects were presented for review by industry stakeholders. More than 65 energy sector stakeholders came to network, present, and learn about DOE projects, while more than 20 joined in by webinar. Energy Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's 2010 Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review More Documents & Publications

29

National Transportation Stakeholders Forum  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRANSPORTATION STAKEHOLDERS TRANSPORTATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM Activities and Accomplishments May 16, 2013 Buffalo, New York NTSF RESOURCES  Wiki Site  Private domain / Registration required  Repository of information  Users are allowed editing capabilities  Webinars  Cover a variety of topics (NRC Rulemaking, Section 180(c), BRC Recommendations, Strategy for Management and Disposal of UNF and HLRW, etc.)  Recording are available on the wiki site  Input is needed for future content NTSF Working Groups COMMUNICATIONS WORKING GROUP  Webinars  Development Guide  LLW Fact Sheet  Table of Waste Types  New Fact Sheets  Newsletter  NFSTPP Communications Products TEPP WORKING GROUP  Formed a TEPP Working Group after the 2012 NTSF to

30

National Transportation Stakeholders Forum  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

N N ti l T t ti National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Chicago, IL, May 26, 2010 Ahmad Al-Daouk Date and page number - 1 Director, National Security Department National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center - Albuquerque, NM National Transportation Stakeholders Forum OSRP * NNSA Contractors transporting in commerce, are required law to comply with applicable regulations required law to comply with applicable regulations (e.g. federal, local, tribal) * Great majority of NNSA shipments are non-secured * Off-Site Source Recovery Program (OSRP) - OSRP is a U.S. Government activity sponsored and overseen by NNSA Office of Global Threat Reduction and the program is managed by LANL Mi i i t t d b d d Date and page number - 2 - Mission is to remove excess, unwanted, abandoned, or

31

Sixth national stakeholder workshop summary report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

On June 17--18, 1998, the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Office of Worker and Community Transition convened its sixth National Stakeholder Workshop at the Ramada Plaza Hotel Old Town in Alexandria, Virginia. Approximately 325 stakeholders attended representing DOE headquarters and field offices, contractors, labor organizations, state and local government, education and community interest groups. The meeting addressed the progress made on the issues and challenges identified at the last stakeholder`s meeting in Oakland, California on April 9--11, 1997. Also discussed were the full range of the Department`s work force issues and creative solutions to the inherent challenges of simultaneously implementing the Department`s post Cold-War mission, work force restructuring guidance, contract reform objectives, asset disposition, performance-based management requirements, and business process improvement policies. The format of the Workshop included several plenary sessions and a number of small group discussion sessions. The small group sessions focused on topics related to labor issues, work force restructuring, work force planning, community transition, and employee concerns. The sessions provided a wide range of views on worker and community transition issues. The plenary sessions of the Workshop included presentations on the following topics: welcome and introductions; opening remarks; building a better labor-management relationship; keynote speech from Secretary of Energy Federico Pena; meeting tomorrow`s challenges (early site closures); harnessing the contracting process to encourage local growth; and, the British experience in economic conversion.

NONE

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

Enclosures STC Stakeholder Meeting Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enclosures STC Enclosures STC Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - Austin, Texas Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - Austin, Texas 2 Enclosures STC Agenda 2011 REVIEW IDENTIFY & REVIEW NEW GAPS COLLABORATION & 2012 PLAN QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION STRATEGIC GOALS Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - Austin, Texas 3 Enclosures STC 2011 REVIEW Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - Austin, Texas 4  New + Existing, Single + Multi-Family  ROOFS  WALLS  FOUNDATIONS  FENESTRATIONS  AIRTIGHTNESS  MATERIALS  OTHER Enclosures STC Categories Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting Wednesday, February 29, 2012 -

33

National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) is the mechanism through which DOE communicates at a national level with states and tribes about the Department's shipments of radioactive waste and materials, as well as occasional high-visibility shipments that are nonradioactive. The purpose of the NTSF is to bring transparency, openness, and accountability to DOE's offsite transportation activities through collaboration with state and tribal governments. The NTSF meetings and webinars will be particularly relevant for personnel with responsibilities in packaging and transportation, emergency management, security, inspection and enforcement, and radiation protection. Send your

34

Energy-Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy-Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Energy-Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review Energy-Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review August 15, 2011 - 1:12pm Addthis The Department of Energy conducted a Peer Review of its Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) Research and Development Program on July 20-22, during which 28 R&D projects were presented for review by industry stakeholders. More than 65 energy sector stakeholders came to network, present, and learn about DOE projects, while more than 20 joined in by webinar. The CEDS program's national lab, academic, and industry partners-including the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) partners and Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG)

35

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Contacts  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

alliances to communicate wind's benefits and challenges to state stakeholders. Contacts | Website Policies | U.S. Department of Energy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 10112012...

36

WIPP Stakeholder Information Page  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WIPP Stakeholder Information Page Closure of Underground Hazardous Waste Disposal Unit Notification of Panel 6 Closure and Final Waste Emplacement dated November 5, 2013 Notification of Last Waste Emplacement and Intent to Commence Closure of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Hazardous Waste Disposal Unit Panel 5 dated March 30, 2011 Submittal of Final Audit Reports Audit Report A-07-16 for INL/CCP RH Waste Characterization Activities dated November 22, 2006 Transmittal of the Certification Audit Report for SRS A-07-01 dated November 21, 2006 CEMRC-CCP Final Audit Report Transmittal dated March 27, 2007 Transmittal of the Final Report of CBFO Recertification Audit A-06-06 of the INL Analytical Laboratories dated June 13, 2007 Transmittal of the Certification Audit Report for the INL/CCP Audit A-07-19 dated June 20, 2007

37

Building America Spring 2012 Stakeholder Meeting Report - Austin, Texas: February 29 - March 2, 2012  

SciTech Connect

The Building America Spring 2012 Stakeholder Meeting was held on February 29-March 2, 2012, in Austin, Texas, and outlined stakeholder needs, collaboration opportunities, and research results as they relate to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Residential Buildings Program. Presenters represented key industry stakeholders, as well as the 10 DOE Building America teams. Attendees represented a variety of industries, including manufacturing, government, nonprofit, and private sector programs.

Not Available

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

38

Building America Spring 2012 Stakeholder Meeting Report - Austin, Texas: February 29 - March 2, 2012  

SciTech Connect

The Building America Spring 2012 Stakeholder Meeting was held on February 29-March 2, 2012, in Austin, Texas, and outlined stakeholder needs, collaboration opportunities, and research results as they relate to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Residential Buildings Program. Presenters represented key industry stakeholders, as well as the 10 DOE Building America teams. Attendees represented a variety of industries, including manufacturing, government, nonprofit, and private sector programs.

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

Spring 2011 National Transportation Stakeholder Forum Meetings, Colorado |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 National 1 National Transportation Stakeholder Forum Meetings, Colorado Spring 2011 National Transportation Stakeholder Forum Meetings, Colorado NTSF Spring 2011 Agenda Final Agenda NTSF Presentations Activities and Accomplishments Developing a Regulatory Framework for Extended Storage and Transportation DOE Railcar Fleet Asset Planning & Lessons Learned DOE Shipment Activities: What We Accomplished and a Look Forward DOE-Idaho's Packaging and Transportation Perspective Enhancing Railroad Hazardous Materials Transportation Safety Evaluation of Shortline Railroads & SNF/HLW Rail Shipment Inspections Tasked for the Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Gamma Industry Processing Alliance Overview Global Threat Reduction Initiative National Nuclear Security Administration Overview

40

OSTI Establishes OAI Server, Achieves Broader Exposure for Records  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

of an OAI server achieves broader exposure of searchable science through OSTI's suite of R&D databases. By becoming a data provider adopting the OAI technical framework, OSTI took...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Position Paper: Modelling with stakeholders  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Stakeholder engagement, collaboration, or participation, shared learning or fact-finding, have become buzz words and hardly any environmental assessment or modelling effort today can be presented without some kind of reference to stakeholders and their ... Keywords: Co-learning, Co-management, Collaborative decision making, Companion modelling, Participatory modelling, Shared learning

Alexey Voinov; Francois Bousquet

2010-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

DOE Order 440. 1 B: Worker Protection Program for DOE (Including...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0. 1 B: Worker Protection Program for DOE (Including NNSA) Federal Employees DOE Order 440. 1 B: Worker Protection Program for DOE (Including NNSA) Federal Employees Stakeholders:...

43

FUSRAP Stakeholder Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S.Department of Energy (DOE) has operated the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) since 1974. During that time,we have accomplished many activities to identify and...

44

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Webinar: Jobs and Economic Development  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Webinar: Jobs and Economic Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Webinar: Jobs and Economic Development Impacts of Offshore Wind Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Webinar: Jobs and Economic Development Impacts of Offshore Wind November 20, 2013 3:00PM EST Online Starting more than a year ago, NREL initiated work to expand the Jobs and Economic Development Impacts (JEDI) model to include fixed-bottom offshore wind technology. Following the completion of the model (and in partnership with the DOE Wind Program, Illinois State University, and James Madison University), NREL supported the analysis of the regional jobs and economic impacts of offshore wind for the Great Lakes, Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, and Gulf Coast regions. The November Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach webinar will provide an overview of the new offshore wind JEDI model and

45

National Transportation Stakeholders Forum | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transportation Stakeholders Forum National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Presentation by Ahmad Al-Daouk, Director of National Security Department NNSA Service Center National...

46

Smart Grid Stakeholder Roundtable Group Perspectives - September...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Stakeholder Roundtable Group Perspectives - September 2009 Smart Grid Stakeholder Roundtable Group Perspectives - September 2009 This document is designed to capture key questions...

47

Advancing sustainable bioenergy: Evolving stakeholder interests and the relevance of research  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The sustainability of future bioenergy production rests on more than continual improvements in its environmental, economic, and social impacts. The emergence of new biomass feedstocks, an expanding array of conversion pathways, and expected increases in overall bioenergy production are connecting diverse technical, social, and policy communities. These stakeholder groups have different and potentially conflicting values and cultures, and therefore different goals and decision making processes. Our aim is to discuss the implications of this diversity for bioenergy researchers. The paper begins with a discussion of bioenergy stakeholder groups and their varied interests, and illustrates how this diversity complicates efforts to define and promote sustainable bioenergy production. We then discuss what this diversity means for research practice. Researchers, we note, should be aware of stakeholder values, information needs, and the factors affecting stakeholder decision making if the knowledge they generate is to reach its widest potential use. We point out how stakeholder participation in research can increase the relevance of its products, and argue that stakeholder values should inform research questions and the choice of analytical assumptions. Finally, we make the case that additional natural science and technical research alone will not advance sustainable bioenergy production, and that important research gaps relate to understanding stakeholder decision making and the need, from a broader social science perspective, to develop processes to identify and accommodate different value systems. While sustainability requires more than improved scientific and technical understanding, the need to understand stakeholder values and manage diversity presents important research opportunities.

Johnson, Timothy L [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Raleigh, North Carolina; Bielicki, Dr Jeffrey M [University of Minnesota; Dodder, Rebecca [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Hilliard, Michael R [ORNL; Kaplan, Ozge [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Miller, C. Andy [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

48

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: News  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

News News This page lists all of the news referenced on the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's website. Also follow news from the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative by subscribing to its newsletter or through an RSS Feed Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative News RSS Feed . Learn about RSS Feeds. Search the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's Database Choose a Subject Category All Agricultural Public Power Schools Small Wind Economic Development Policy Choose # of Records per Page Default (10 per page) 5 25 50 To search the titles, enter a word or phrase. Start Search Clear Contents Total of 464 records found. Page 1 of 93, Sorted by descending date Filtered by: News 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

49

Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Development Technical Support and General Environmental Studies Report on Outreach to Stakeholders for Fiscal Year 2009  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Report on activities working with stakeholders in the emerging marine and hydrokinetic energy industry during FY09, for DOE EERE Office of Waterpower.

Copping, Andrea E.; Geerlofs, Simon H.

2010-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

50

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Contacts  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Staff Contacts Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Staff Contacts This page introduces the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach team. If you have questions, please contact the Webmaster. Photo of Patrick Gilman Patrick Gilman Wind Energy Deployment Manager, U.S. Department of Energy 720-356-1420 Photo of Ben Chicoski Ben Chicoski Senior Analyst, Energetics Incorporated 202-406-4149 Photo of Debbie Schultheis Debbie Schultheis Technical Project Officer, U.S. Department of Energy 720-356-1811 Photo of Mark Bolinger Mark Bolinger Research Scientist, Electricity Markets and Policy Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 603-795-4937 Photo of Tessa Dardani Tessa Dardani Administrative Analyst, National Renewable Energy Laboratory 303-384-6962 Photo of Ben Hoen Ben Hoen Principal Research Associate, Electricity Markets and Policy Group,

51

Clean Cities: 2011 Clean Cities Stakeholder Summit  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Events Events Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Clean Cities: 2011 Clean Cities Stakeholder Summit to someone by E-mail Share Clean Cities: 2011 Clean Cities Stakeholder Summit on Facebook Tweet about Clean Cities: 2011 Clean Cities Stakeholder Summit on Twitter Bookmark Clean Cities: 2011 Clean Cities Stakeholder Summit on Google Bookmark Clean Cities: 2011 Clean Cities Stakeholder Summit on Delicious Rank Clean Cities: 2011 Clean Cities Stakeholder Summit on Digg Find More places to share Clean Cities: 2011 Clean Cities Stakeholder Summit on AddThis.com... Conferences & Workshops Clean Cities 20th Anniversary Electric Vehicle Community Readiness Stakeholder Summit Waste-to-Wheels Plug-In Vehicle & Infrastructure Fuel & Vehicle Strategy 2011 Clean Cities Stakeholder Summit

52

A Broader Perspective about Organization and Coherence in Biological Systems  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The implications of large-scale coherence in biological systems and possible links to quantum theory are only beginning to be explored. Whether quantum-like coherent phenomena are relevant, or even possible at all, at the high temperatures of biological systems remains unsettled. Here, we present a broader perspective on biological organization and how quantum-like dynamics and coherence might shape the very fabric from which complex biological systems are organized. Regardless of its exact nature, a unique form of coherence seems apparent at multiple scales in biology and its better characterization may have broad consequences for the understanding of living organisms as complex systems.

Martin Robert

2012-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

53

Stakeholder collaboration and engagement in virtual projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Stakeholder management is an important and common practice in any project, as it allows managers to better manage process, performance and risk. In virtual projects, collaboration and engagement with stakeholders is relatively more complex, challenging, ...

Ofer Zwikael; Arun A. Elias; Mark J. Ahn

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

54

Stakeholder Priorities in Wind Energy (Presentation)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This presentation provides an overview of stakeholder priorities as they relate to wind power, including priorities by region and type.

Lantz, E.

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

55

FINAL_2013_Stakeholder-Letter  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Send a letter to local officials/stakeholders about your participation in EPA's 2013 ENERGY STAR National Send a letter to local officials/stakeholders about your participation in EPA's 2013 ENERGY STAR National Building Competition by customizing the text below with your organization's information and whether you're also participating in the communications category of the competition. Dear [Name of official], [Name of buildings/space], owned/managed by [organization], has been selected to participate in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) 2013 ENERGY STAR National Building Competition: Battle of the Buildings to help improve the energy efficiency of commercial buildings and protect the environment. In the spirit of popular weight-loss competitions, [name of buildings/space] will battle it out against thousands of other teams representing buildings and

56

Does  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Does Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Yu-San Liu Æ Yining Zeng Æ Yonghua Luo Æ Qi Xu Æ Michael E. Himmel Æ Steve J. Smith Æ Shi-You Ding Received: 26 November 2008 / Accepted: 11 May 2009 / Published online: 19 June 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Exoglucanases are key enzymes required for the efficient hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. It has been proposed that exoglucanases hydrolyze cellulose chains in a processive manner to produce primarily cellobiose. Usually, two functional modules are involved in the processive mechanism: a catalytic module and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). In this report, single molecule tracking techniques were used to analyze the molecular motion of CBMs labeled with quantum dots (QDs) and bound to cellulose crystals. By tracking the single QD, we observed that the family 2 CBM from

57

DOE  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

DOE DOE /E/A- 0202( 83//Q J Sh or t-T er m En er gy O ut lo ok a to m Quar terly Proje ction s Febru ary 1983 Ene rgy Info rma tion Adm inist ratio n Was hing ton, D.C. t rt jrt .or t lor t lor t .lor t- ior t- ior t <.o rt ort . m .er m -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -T erm -T erm -T erm Nrm ue rgy En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y ^n erg y Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Sh ort -T erm 1 Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm

58

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ChicNorth_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

at the site, and DOE does not require on-site monitoring or surveillance. Office of Legacy Management activities consist of managing site records and responding to stakeholder...

59

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ColumbusEast_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

owned site, and DOE does not require on-site monitoring or surveillance. Office of Legacy Management activities consist of managing site records and responding to stakeholder...

60

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Chupadera_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

at the site, and DOE does not require on-site monitoring or surveillance. Office of Legacy Management activities consist of managing site records and responding to stakeholder...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Aliquippa2_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

at the site, and DOE does not require on-site monitoring or surveillance. Office of Legacy Management activities consist of managing site records and responding to stakeholder...

62

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Publications  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Publications Publications This page lists all of the publications referenced on the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's website. Search the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's Database Choose a Subject Category All Agricultural Public Power Schools Small Wind Economic Development Policy Choose # of Records per Page Default (10 per page) 5 25 50 To search the titles, enter a word or phrase. Start Search Clear Contents Total of 449 records found. Page 1 of 90, Sorted by descending date Filtered by: Publication 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 Next Page >>

63

Wind Energy Stakeholder Outreach and Education  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Since August of 2001, Bob Lawrence and Associates, Inc. (BL&A) has applied its outreach and support services to lead a highly effective work effort on behalf of Wind Powering America (WPA). In recent years, the company has generated informative brochures and posters, researched and created case studies, and provided technical support to key wind program managers. BL&A has also analyzed Lamar, Colorados 162MW wind project and developed a highly regarded 'wind supply chain' report and outreach presentation. BL&As efforts were then replicated to characterize similar supply chain presentations in New Mexico and Illinois. Note that during the period of this contract, the recipient met with members of the DOE Wind Program a number of times to obtain specific guidance on tasks that needed to be pursued on behalf of this grant. Thus, as the project developed over the course of 5 years, the recipient varied the tasks and emphasis on tasks to comply with the on-going and continuously developing requirements of the Wind Powering America Program. This report provides only a brief summary of activities to illustrate the recipient's work for advancing wind energy education and outreach from 2001 through the end of the contract period in 2006. It provides examples of how the recipient and DOE leveraged the available funding to provide educational and outreach work to a wide range of stakeholder communities.

Bob Lawrence; Craig Cox; Jodi Hamrick; DOE Contact - Keith Bennett

2006-07-27T23:59:59.000Z

64

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- CEER  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

for maintaining records for the CEER site transferred to DOE's Office of Legacy Management in 2006. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For...

65

Property:DIA/Stakeholders | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Property Property Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Property:DIA/Stakeholders Jump to: navigation, search Property Name DIA/Stakeholders Property Type String Description A list of stakeholders for DIA related tools Pages using the property "DIA/Stakeholders" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) A Applied Dynamic Analysis of the Global Economy (ADAGE) Model + economic consultants +, environmental professionals +, government policymakers + Asia-Pacific Integrated Model (AIM) + Government policymakers +, economic consultants +, environmental professionals +, ... E E3MG + economic consultants +, environmental professionals +, academics +, ... Electricity Markets Analysis (EMA) Model + government policymakers +, economic consultants +, environmental professionals +

66

Building Technologies Office: Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholde...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder's Meeting - Spring 2011 on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office:...

67

Independent Communication and Outreach Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management December 2012 Independent Communication and Outreach Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey Independent Communication and Outreach Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey December 2012 Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 1

68

Business process innovation based on stakeholder perceptions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The literature offers a multitude of modeling and assessment techniques to represent differing enterprise stakeholder perspectives and interests in business process innovation. While each technique yields valuable insights into possibilities for innovating ... Keywords: Business process innovation, soft systems thinking, stakeholder analysis

Mark Lewis; Brett Young; Lars Mathiassen; Arun Rai; Richard Welke

2007-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

69

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Information Resources  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Information Information Resources Printable Version Bookmark and Share Publications Success Stories Webinars Podcasts Videos Stakeholder Interviews Lessons Learned Wind Working Groups Economic Impact Studies Wind Turbine Ordinances Information Resources These information resources include links to wind energy videos, audio files, and publications. A photo of the wind turbine next to the greenhouse. Ponderosa High School administrators in Flagstaff, Arizona have taken on projects like the greenhouse and the renewable energy installation and a number of others around their campus in order to make it a school of opportunity and a school that's a great example for others. Success Stories Read about the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's success stories. Stakeholder Interviews

70

Building America Spring 2012 Stakeholder Meeting Report: Austin...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Building America Spring 2012 Stakeholder Meeting Report: Austin, Texas; February 29 - March 2, 2012 Building America Spring 2012 Stakeholder Meeting Report: Austin, Texas; February...

71

Nuclear waste transportation: Case studies of identifying stakeholder risk information needs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for the cleanup of our nations nuclear legacy, involving complex decisions about how and where to dispose of nuclear waste and how to transport it to its ultimate disposal site. It is widely recognized that a broad range of stakeholders and tribes should be involved in this kind of decision. All too frequently, however, stakeholders and tribes are only invited to participate by commenting on processes and activities that are near completion; they are not included in the problem formulation stages. Moreover, it is often assumed that high levels of complexity and uncertainty prevent meaningful participation by these groups. Considering the types of information that stakeholders and tribes need to be able to participate in the full life cycle of decision making is critical for improving participation and transparency of decision making. Toward this objective, the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP) participated in three public processes relating to nuclear waste transportation and disposal in 19971998. First, CRESP organized focus groups to identify concerns about nuclear waste transportation. Second, CRESP conducted exit surveys at regional public workshops held by DOE to get input from stakeholders on intersite waste transfer issues. Third, CRESP developed visual tools to synthesize technical information and allow stakeholders and tribes with varying levels of knowledge about nuclear waste to participate in meaningful discussion. In this article we share the results of the CRESP findings, discuss common themes arising from these interactions, and comment on special considerations needed to facilitate stakeholder and tribal participation in similar decision-making processes. Key words: environmental information, hazardous waste, risk communication, risk perception, stakeholders. Environ Health Perspect

Christina H. Drew; Deirdre A. Grace; Susan M. Silbernagel; Erin S. Hemmings; Alan Smith; William C. Griffith; Timothy K. Takaro; Elaine M. Faustman

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

72

Tribal and stakeholder involvement in systems analysis  

SciTech Connect

Beginning in early 1995, U.S. Department of Energy began an experiment to link tribal and stakeholder representatives into technology assessment activities related to an Integrated Nonthermal Treatment System (INTS) study. The INTS study moved outside the framework of after-the-fact public involvement by providing the opportunity for technical and non-technical stakeholders alike to work together in the early predecision stages of the criteria development and assessment of options for innovative mixed waste treatment. The stakeholders gained an appreciation of the intense level of effort required to complete such an analysis. The engineers and scientists conducting the systems analyses had the opportunity (some for the first time) to learn more about tribal and stakeholder issues and how they might apply to the technical tasks related to technology assessment and selection.

McClure, L. [Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company, Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Swartz, G. [Swartz and Associates, Boulder City, NV (United States); Cooley, C. [Department of Energy, Germantown, MD (United States)

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

DOE Convenes Multi-stakeholder Process to Address Privacy for...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Experience: New Guide Offers Utilities' Insights on Engaging with Smart Grid Customers Green Button: Enabling Energy Innovation Department of Energy Seeks Information on Smart...

74

The DOE Efficiency Standards Stakeholder Process: An Approach...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

According to the US Department of Energy, Office of Codes and Standards, "U.S. homeowners spend 110 billion each year to power such home appliances as refrigerators,...

75

The value of adding regional to local stakeholder involvement in evaluating the acceptability of innovative technologies  

SciTech Connect

Technology is urgently needed to clean up contamination by volatile organic compounds at United States Department of Energy (DOE) sites. In many cases, however, existing technology is too slow, inefficient, or expensive. The record of technology development is, in some cases, similarly disappointing. Remediation technologies developed at great expense and evaluated piecemeal over long periods have not been deployed because, in the end, the public judged them ineffective or unacceptable. The need for successful methods of remediation is too great and resources too limited to continue with ineffective technology evaluation. In order to make good decisions about which technologies to deploy, remedial project managers need to know stakeholders` requirements for the performance of proposed technologies. Expanding stakeholder involvement regionally identifies the concerns of a broad range of stakeholders at and DOE sites throughout the West -- issues that must be taken into account if technologies are to be accepted for wide deployment.

Peterson, T.S.; McCabe, G. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States); Niesen, K.; Serie, P. [Environmental Issues Management, Inc., Seattle, WA (United States)

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

Wind Program: Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Outreach Outreach Printable Version Bookmark and Share The Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative of the U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Program is designed to educate, engage, and enable critical stakeholders to make informed decisions about how wind energy contributes to the U.S. electricity supply. Highlights Resources Wind Resource Maps State Activities What activities are happening in my state? AK AL AR AZ CA CO CT DC DE FL GA HI IA ID IL IN KS KY LA MA MD ME MI MN MO MS MT NC ND NE NH NJ NM NV NY OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VA VT WA WI WV WY Installed wind capacity maps. Features A image of a house with a residential-scale small wind turbine. Small Wind for Homeowners, Farmers, and Businesses Stakeholder Engagement & Outreach Projects

77

Community stakeholder responses to advocacy advertising  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Focus group research was used to examine how community stakeholders, a group with local industry experience, responded to coal industry advocacy messages. The stakeholders expressed beliefs about both the advertiser and the coal industry, and while their knowledge led to critical consideration of the industry campaign, they also expressed a desire to identify with positive messages about their community. Applying a postpositivist research perspective, a new model is introduced to integrate these beliefs in terms of advertiser trust and industry accountability under the existing theoretical framework of persuasion knowledge. Agent and topic knowledge are combined in this model based on responses to the industry advocacy campaign. In doing so, this study integrates a priori theory within a new context, extending the current theoretical framework to include an understanding of how community stakeholders - a common target for marketplace advocacy - interpret industry messages.

Miller, B.; Sinclair, J. [Elon University, Elon, NC (United States). School Community

2009-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

78

Energy Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy¬タルs 2010 Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review July 29, 2010 The Department of Energy conducted a Peer Review of its Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) Research and Development Program on July 20-22, during which 28 R&D projects were presented for review by industry stakeholders. More than 65 energy sector stakeholders came to network, present, and learn about DOE projects, while more than 20 joined in by webinar. The CEDS program's national lab, academic, and industry partners-including the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) partners and Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) project- presented DOE-supported efforts involving secured SCADA communications and smart grid applications,

79

Spring 2013 National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Meeting, New York |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Transportation Stakeholders Forum » Spring 2013 National National Transportation Stakeholders Forum » Spring 2013 National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Meeting, New York Spring 2013 National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Meeting, New York Spring 2013 National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Meeting, New York Save the Date NTSF Registration Announcement NTSF 2013 Agenda EM's Huizenga Gives Keynote Address at National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Spring 2013 NTSF Presentations May 14, 2013 Presentations Communication Is Key to Packaging and Transportation Safety and Compliance North American Standard Level VI Inspection Program Update: Ensuring Safe Transportation of Radioactive Material Enhancing Railroad Hazardous Materials Transportation Safety Rail Routing U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board: Roles and Priorities

80

Arid sites stakeholder participation in evaluating innovative technologies: VOC-Arid Site Integrated Demonstration  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Developing and deploying innovative environmental cleanup technologies is an important goal for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), which faces challenging remediation problems at contaminated sites throughout the United States. Achieving meaningful, constructive stakeholder involvement in cleanup programs, with the aim of ultimate acceptance of remediation decisions, is critical to meeting those challenges. DOE`s Office of Technology Development sponsors research and demonstration of new technologies, including, in the past, the Volatile Organic Compounds Arid Site Integrated Demonstration (VOC-Arid ID), hosted at the Hanford Site in Washington State. The purpose of the VOC-Arid ID has been to develop and demonstrate new technologies for remediating carbon tetrachloride and other VOC contamination in soils and ground water. In October 1994 the VOC-Arid ID became a part of the Contaminant Plume Containment and Remediation Focus Area (Plume Focus Area). The VOC Arid ID`s purpose of involving stakeholders in evaluating innovative technologies will now be carried on in the Plume Focus Area in cooperation with Site Technology Coordination Groups and Site Specific Advisory Boards. DOE`s goal is to demonstrate promising technologies once and deploy those that are successful across the DOE complex. Achieving that goal requires that the technologies be acceptable to the groups and individuals with a stake in DOE facility cleanup. Such stakeholders include groups and individuals with an interest in cleanup, including regulatory agencies, Native American tribes, environmental and civic interest groups, public officials, environmental technology users, and private citizens. This report documents the results of the stakeholder involvement program, which is an integral part of the VOC-Arid ID.

Peterson, T.S.; McCabe, G.H.; Brockbank, B.R. [and others

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Notice of an Open Meeting on February 26, 2013 of the Multi-stakeholder  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

an Open Meeting on February 26, 2013 of the an Open Meeting on February 26, 2013 of the Multi-stakeholder Process To Develop a Voluntary Code of Conduct for Smart Grid Data Privacy: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 28 - Feb. 11, 2013 Notice of an Open Meeting on February 26, 2013 of the Multi-stakeholder Process To Develop a Voluntary Code of Conduct for Smart Grid Data Privacy: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 28 - Feb. 11, 2013 The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (DOE OE) will convene the first meeting of the smart grid data privacy multi-stakeholder process concerning the development of an Voluntary Code of Conduct for utility and third parties providing consumer energy use services. The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 26, 2013

82

Phase 1 involvement for potential stakeholders of the VOC-Arid Integrated Demonstration  

SciTech Connect

This report describes Phase I of a three-phased study to support evaluation of new cleanup technologies for federal facilities. It directly supports the Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)-Arid Site Integrated Demonstration (VOC-Arid ID) being conducted at the Hanford Site. The purpose of the activity is to develop and demonstrate new technologies for cleaning up carbon tetrachloride and other VOCs in soils and groundwater. The institutional assessment task of the VOC-Arid ID, which is being performed by Battelle Seattle Research Center, is assessing regulatory and public acceptability of new technologies. Phase I focuses on gathering Hanford stakeholder input on how to evaluate technologies. Phase II will involve stakeholders applying the technology evaluation criteria to actual demonstration technologies. In Phase III, the task will evaluate stakeholder acceptability of innovative technologies at other DOE candidate sites. Only if a technology performs effectively during demonstration, and is accepted by the regulatory community and the public, can it be recommended for deployment. Phase I consisted of a series of stakeholder interviews and two stakeholder workshops, both designed to receive input about the criteria to be used to evaluate innovative technologies.

McCabe, G.H. [Battelle Seattle Research Center, WA (United States)

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA In May 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a policy in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for decommissioning surplus DOE facilities consistent with the requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This policy ensures protection of the environment, worker health and public health, provides opportunities for stakeholder involvement, and achieves risk reduction without unnecessary delay. Consistent with the jointly issued "Guidance on Accelerating CERCLA Environmental Restoration at Federal Facilities" (August 22, 1994), this decommissioning policy encourages streamlined decision-making. This

84

Energy-Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program on July 20-22, during which 28 R&D projects were presented for review by industry stakeholders. More than 65 energy sector stakeholders came to network, present, and...

85

Clean Cities 2011 Stakeholders Summit - Electric Drive Vehicles...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Department of Energy's Vehicle Technologies Program Vehicle Technologies Program - Clean Cities 2011 Stakeholders Summit - Electric Drive Vehicles and Charging Infrastructure...

86

Home Energy Score: Program Update for Interested Stakeholders  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Home Energy Score: Home Energy Score: Program Update for Interested Stakeholders Joan Glickman Senior Advisor/Program Manager U.S. Department of Energy July 23, 2012 1 eere.energy.gov DOE's objectives for the Home Energy Score Program * Strengthen the home energy improvement market * Provide an affordable and credible means for homeowners to understand - their home's energy performance, - how their home compares to others in their area, and - how to improve its efficiency. * Build on and complement existing home energy improvement efforts * Help trained workers enter the private sector energy improvement market, as Weatherization work funded by the Recovery Act ramps down 2 eere.energy.gov Better Information: Home Energy Score * Voluntary MPG rating for homes and

87

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Wind Working Groups  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Information Information Resources Printable Version Bookmark and Share Publications Success Stories Webinars Podcasts Videos Stakeholder Interviews Lessons Learned Wind Working Groups Economic Impact Studies Wind Turbine Ordinances Wind Working Groups Wind Powering America educates, equips, and supports state wind working groups that form strategic alliances to communicate wind's benefits and challenges to state stakeholders. State Wind Working Groups The U.S. map below shows which states have wind working groups. Click on a state to read about its wind working group. Text version of states with Wind Working Groups Alaska Arizona Arkansas Colorado Connecticut Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Michigan Montana Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New Mexico North Carolina

88

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Agricultural Podcasts  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Information Information Resources Printable Version Bookmark and Share Publications Success Stories Webinars Podcasts Videos Stakeholder Interviews Lessons Learned Wind Working Groups Economic Impact Studies Wind Turbine Ordinances Agricultural Podcasts Wind Powering America Podcasts Handout Wind Powering America provides this printable postcard as an outreach tool. Wind Powering America and the National Association of Farm Broadcasters produces a series of radio interviews on wind energy aimed at a rural stakeholder audience. To subscribe, click on the PODCAST button below to open up the feed. Copy the URL from your browser's address bar into your podcast subscription software. For a list of podcast software, see Podcasting News' list of podcast software clients. Podcast Title: Wind Energy Forum Enhances Positives of Wind Production

89

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Webinar Podcasts  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Webinar Podcasts Webinar Podcasts The Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative hosts a series of webinars on current wind energy issues. Audiovisual files and text versions of each webinar are available. To subscribe, click on the PODCAST button below to open up the feed. Copy the URL from your browser's address bar into your podcast subscription software. For a list of podcast software, see Podcasting News' list of podcast software clients. Podcast Title: Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Webinar: Jobs and Economic Development Impacts of Offshore Wind Speaker: Aaron Smith, Suzanne Tegen, David Keyser, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Date: November 20, 2013 Running time: 1 hour Title: Small Wind Standards and Policy Update: A WPA Webinar Speaker: Heather Rhoads-Weaver, eFormative Options; Matt Gagne, eFormative

90

ONE of SIX SMART GRID STAKEHOLDER BOOKS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ONE of SIX SMART GRID STAKEHOLDER BOOKS ONE of SIX SMART GRID STAKEHOLDER BOOKS utilities consumer advocates regulators environmental groups technology providers policymakers WHAT THE SMART GRID MEANS TO AMERICANS. A smarter electrical grid can save us energy, protect consumers, safeguard our environment and ultimately save money for all Americans. 2 DISCLAIMER PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Litos Strategic Communication, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that

91

Fifth national stakeholder workshop summary report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

On April 9--11, 1997, the Department of Energy`s Office of Worker and Community Transition convened its fifth National Stakeholder Workshop. The workshop addressed a wide range of work force restructuring and community transition issues critical to the future success of the Department. Two important elements of the meeting were: (1) reviewing progress made on the challenges identified during the March 1996f stakeholder`s meeting in Atlanta, Georgia; and (2) identifying areas that needed priority attention during the early months of the second Clinton Administration. The format of the Workshop included several plenary sessions and a number of small group discussion sessions. The small group sessions focused on topics related to labor issues, work force restructuring, work force planning, community transition, and employee concerns. The sessions provided a wide range of views on worker and community transition issues. The workshop included presentations on the following topics: Welcome and introductions; Opening remarks; Community reuse organizations: recent accomplishments; Privatization: policy, practice and potential pitfalls; Department of Energy`s integrated training initiatives; Congressional perspective on work force restructuring; and, Privatization and the Ten Year Plan.

NONE

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

92

Nearly 200 Attend National Transportation Stakeholders Forum | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

200 Attend National Transportation Stakeholders Forum 200 Attend National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Nearly 200 Attend National Transportation Stakeholders Forum May 21, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis EM Senior Advisor Dave Huizenga provides the keynote address at the recent National Transportation Stakeholders Forum meeting. EM Senior Advisor Dave Huizenga provides the keynote address at the recent National Transportation Stakeholders Forum meeting. NE's Jeff Williams discusses the status of the Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project. NE's Jeff Williams discusses the status of the Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project. Richard Arnold, with the Pahrump Paiute Tribe, provides an overview of Tribal Caucus action items and initiatives for enhanced national transportation coordination.

93

Energy Systems Integration Facility (ESIF) External Stakeholders Workshop: Workshop Proceedings, 9 October 2008, Golden, Colorado  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

On October 9, 2008, NREL hosted a workshop to provide an opportunity for external stakeholders to offer insights and recommendations on the design and functionality of DOE's planned Energy Systems Infrastructure Facility (ESIF). The goal was to ensure that the planning for the ESIF effectively addresses the most critical barriers to large-scale energy efficiency (EE) and renewable energy (RE) deployment. This technical report documents the ESIF workshop proceedings.

Komomua, C.; Kroposki, B.; Mooney, D.; Stoffel, T.; Parsons, B.; Hammond, S.; Kutscher, C.; Remick, R.; Sverdrup, G.; Hawsey, R.; Pacheco, M.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

10 C.F.R. 820: Procedural Rules for DOE Nuclear Activities |...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20: Procedural Rules for DOE Nuclear Activities 10 C.F.R. 820: Procedural Rules for DOE Nuclear Activities Stakeholders: DOE employees Scope: 10 C.F.R. 820 outlines the appropriate...

95

DOE hydrogen program. Monthly progress report, February 2, 1996--February 29, 1996  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The objective of this program is to conduct program planning, systems analysis and stakeholder outreach activities for the DOE Hydrogen Program. Progress is described.

NONE

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

96

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For March 19, 2013 to April 3, 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the...

97

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For February 12, 2013 to February...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the...

98

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For January 1, 2013 to January 28...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the...

99

Memorandum: Participation of the EM SSAB, Stakeholders, and Regulators in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Participation of the EM SSAB, Stakeholders, and Participation of the EM SSAB, Stakeholders, and Regulators in EM Budget Requests Memorandum: Participation of the EM SSAB, Stakeholders, and Regulators in EM Budget Requests From: Merle L. Sykes, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Program Planning and Budget (EM-30) This memorandum provides information on the involvement of the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Board (SSAB), stakeholders, and regulators in the EM budget formulation process for fiscal year (FY) 2011 and future fiscal years. Any future guidance and updates on EM SSAB and other stakeholders' involvement will be provided as part of EM's annual spring budget guidance. Sykes Memorandum - June 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications Memorandum: Guidance for Participation of the EM SSAB, Stakeholders,

100

Integration of MEA Components-Status and Technology Gaps: A Stakeholders Perspective  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Fuel Cell Pre-Solicitation Workshop DOE Fuel Cell Pre-Solicitation Workshop March 16-17, 2010 Denver, CO 3M Fuel Cell Components Program Mark Debe, Steve Hamrock, Radoslav Atanasoski, Pinar Serim, Eric Funkenbusch, Mike Yandrasits, Stan Garnsworthy and Customers Integration of MEA Components - Status and Technology Gaps - A Stakeholder's Perspective 2 Outline: 1. What does MEA integration mean? 2. Where the technology may be going with regard to 2015 3. Status and relative gaps for 2015 at the individual component level 4. Status and relative gaps for 2015 at the MEA integration level 5. Suggestions where DOE should concentrate its efforts in the near future 6. Other general suggestions and recommendations Integration of MEA Components 3M perspectives on technology development needs and gaps. 3M U.S. DOE Fuel Cell Pre-Solicitation Workshop Denver, CO, March 16-17, 2010

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Wind Energy Videos  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Wind Energy Videos Wind Energy Videos This page lists wind energy videos. Search the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's Database Choose a Subject Category All Agricultural Public Power Schools Small Wind Economic Development Policy Choose # of Records per Page Default (10 per page) 5 25 50 To search the titles, enter a word or phrase. Start Search Clear Contents Total of 30 records found. Page 1 of 6, Sorted by descending date Filtered by: Video 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page >> Date sort by ascending date sort by descending date State sort by ascending state sort by descending state Type of Information Program Area Title sort by ascending title sort by descending title 1/29/2013 KS News Video Kansas State University Videos Explore Wind Energy [..More] 10/22/2012 NE News

102

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Wind Turbine Ordinances  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Information Information Resources Printable Version Bookmark and Share Publications Success Stories Webinars Podcasts Videos Stakeholder Interviews Lessons Learned Wind Working Groups Economic Impact Studies Wind Turbine Ordinances Wind Turbine Ordinances This page lists 135 state and local wind turbine ordinances. State and local governments and policymakers can use this collection of example wind turbine ordinances when drafting a new wind energy ordinance in a town or county without existing ordinances. Due to increasing energy demands in the United States and more installed wind projects, rural communities and local governments with limited or no experience with wind energy now have the opportunity to become involved in this industry. Communities with good wind resources may be approached by

103

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Public Power Resources  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Public Power Public Power Resources Regional Activities State Activities State Lands Siting Public Power Resources This page lists wind-related information resources such as publications, websites, and news for public power. Search the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's Database Choose a Type of Information All News Publications Web Resource Videos Choose # of Records per Page Default (10 per page) 5 25 50 To search the titles, enter a word or phrase. Start Search Clear Contents Total of 81 records found. Page 1 of 17, Sorted by descending date Filtered by: Public Power 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next Page >> Date sort by ascending date sort by descending date State sort by ascending state sort by descending state Type of Information Program Area Title sort by ascending title sort by descending title

104

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Native American Resources  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Resources Resources This page lists resources and tools specifically for Native Americans. Read personal interviews with Native Americans who have experience installing wind power on Native American lands, find wind resource maps that have Indian Reservation boundaries, and watch a video about installing wind power on Native American lands. Search the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's Database Choose a Type of Information All News Publications Web Resource Videos Choose # of Records per Page Default (10 per page) 5 25 50 To search the titles, enter a word or phrase. Start Search Clear Contents Total of 42 records found. Page 1 of 9, Sorted by descending date Filtered by: Native Americans 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Page >> Date sort by ascending date sort by descending date State sort by ascending state sort by descending state Type of Information Program Area Title sort by ascending title sort by descending title

105

Building Technologies Office: Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholde...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Webinars Building America Residential Research Better Buildings Alliance Solid-State Lighting Events DOE Challenge Home Zero Net-Energy-Ready Home Training September 23, 2013 EEBA...

106

NETL Publications: Stakeholder Workshop for Advanced Sensing...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National Energy Technology Laboratory Presentation PDF-5.34MB U.S. DOE Office of Fossil Energy Overview Regis Conrad, Advanced Research Program Manager Presentation...

107

Decision insight into stakeholder conflict for ERN.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Participatory modeling has become an important tool in facilitating resource decision making and dispute resolution. Approaches to modeling that are commonly used in this context often do not adequately account for important human factors. Current techniques provide insights into how certain human activities and variables affect resource outcomes; however, they do not directly simulate the complex variables that shape how, why, and under what conditions different human agents behave in ways that affect resources and human interactions related to them. Current approaches also do not adequately reveal how the effects of individual decisions scale up to have systemic level effects in complex resource systems. This lack of integration prevents the development of more robust models to support decision making and dispute resolution processes. Development of integrated tools is further hampered by the fact that collection of primary data for decision-making modeling is costly and time consuming. This project seeks to develop a new approach to resource modeling that incorporates both technical and behavioral modeling techniques into a single decision-making architecture. The modeling platform is enhanced by use of traditional and advanced processes and tools for expedited data capture. Specific objectives of the project are: (1) Develop a proof of concept for a new technical approach to resource modeling that combines the computational techniques of system dynamics and agent based modeling, (2) Develop an iterative, participatory modeling process supported with traditional and advance data capture techniques that may be utilized to facilitate decision making, dispute resolution, and collaborative learning processes, and (3) Examine potential applications of this technology and process. The development of this decision support architecture included both the engineering of the technology and the development of a participatory method to build and apply the technology. Stakeholder interaction with the model and associated data capture was facilitated through two very different modes of engagement, one a standard interface involving radio buttons, slider bars, graphs and plots, while the other utilized an immersive serious gaming interface. The decision support architecture developed through this project was piloted in the Middle Rio Grande Basin to examine how these tools might be utilized to promote enhanced understanding and decision-making in the context of complex water resource management issues. Potential applications of this architecture and its capacity to lead to enhanced understanding and decision-making was assessed through qualitative interviews with study participants who represented key stakeholders in the basin.

Siirola, John; Tidwell, Vincent Carroll; Benz, Zachary O.; Stansbury, Melanie; Richards, Elizabeth H.; Turnley, Jessica Glicken (Galisteo Consulting); Warrender, Christina E.; Morrow, James Dan

2012-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

DOE Response to Japan  

SciTech Connect

DOE/NNSA NA?40 was requested to provide support with consequence management activities following the incident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. The response involved the deployment of several DOE/NNSA NA?40 assets to provide specialized capabilities analysts, scientists, doctors, nurses, specialized equipment and systems to characterize the deposition for the protection of the public and the environment. General response activities revolved around the concepts of: predictive modeling; monitoring and data collection from the air and on the ground; assessing the collected data and other relevant information; interpreting the data; and coordinating the communication of the interpreted data to the appropriate stakeholders.

Wendy Pemberton and RaJah Mena

2011-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

109

Spring 2010 National Transportation Stakeholder Forum Meetings, Illinois |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 National 0 National Transportation Stakeholder Forum Meetings, Illinois Spring 2010 National Transportation Stakeholder Forum Meetings, Illinois NTSF Spring 2010 Agenda Final Agenda NTSF Presentations Applying Risk Communication to the Transportation of Radioactive Materials Department of Energy Office of Science Transportation Overview Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Activities EM Waste and Materials Disposition & Transportation National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management Status and Future of TRANSCOM Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program - Making A Difference Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Status and Plans - 2010 Meeting Summary Meeting Summary Notes

110

Spring 2012 National Transportation Stakeholder Forum Meetings, Tennessee |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Waste Management » Packaging and Transportation » Services » Waste Management » Packaging and Transportation » National Transportation Stakeholders Forum » Spring 2012 National Transportation Stakeholder Forum Meetings, Tennessee Spring 2012 National Transportation Stakeholder Forum Meetings, Tennessee NTSF Registration Website Save The Date! NTSF Spring 2012 Agenda NTSF Agenda Midwestern Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee Agenda Northeast High-Level Radioactive Waste Transportation Task Force Agenda Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group Agenda Western Governor's Association Agenda NTSF Presentations Session Newcomers' Orientation Plenary Sessions Keynote Address Oak Ridge Operations Office of Environmental Management Overview Global Threat Reduction Initiative Task Force for Strategic Developments to Blue Ribbon Commission

111

White House Energy Security Stakeholders Forum | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Security Stakeholders Forum Energy Security Stakeholders Forum White House Energy Security Stakeholders Forum July 27, 2010 - 1:04pm Addthis Remarks as Prepared for Delivery U.S. Deputy Secretary of Energy Daniel Poneman White House Energy Security Stakeholders Forum Tuesday, July 27, 2010 Good afternoon. Thank you Secretary Mabus and Carol Browner for your leadership on these important issues. It's a pleasure to be here today with all of our distinguished panelists and guests. Before I begin my remarks, I want to take a moment to thank all the men and women here today who work day in and day out to keep our country safe. We greatly appreciate your sacrifice and service. It is fitting that today's forum includes representatives from both the energy and defense sectors, from academia and the business community. Our

112

White House Energy Security Stakeholders Forum | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

White House Energy Security Stakeholders Forum White House Energy Security Stakeholders Forum White House Energy Security Stakeholders Forum July 27, 2010 - 1:04pm Addthis Remarks as Prepared for Delivery U.S. Deputy Secretary of Energy Daniel Poneman White House Energy Security Stakeholders Forum Tuesday, July 27, 2010 Good afternoon. Thank you Secretary Mabus and Carol Browner for your leadership on these important issues. It's a pleasure to be here today with all of our distinguished panelists and guests. Before I begin my remarks, I want to take a moment to thank all the men and women here today who work day in and day out to keep our country safe. We greatly appreciate your sacrifice and service. It is fitting that today's forum includes representatives from both the energy and defense sectors, from academia and the business community. Our

113

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Subscribe to News and Events  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Subscribe to News and Events Subscribe to News and Events Follow news from the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative by subscribing to its newsletter, or following its news and events RSS feeds. Newsletter The Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Newsletter informs partners and stakeholders every other week of events and webinars, financial opportunities, new publications, state successes, and other program activities. Enter your e-mail address below to begin the registration process. After you subscribe to the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Newsletter, you can choose to subscribe to other energy efficiency and renewable energy news. Archived copies are not available, but all of the news items can be found on this website under news, events, and publications. Enter your email address:

114

Stakeholder-assisted modeling and policy design for engineering systems  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

There is a growing realization that stakeholder involvement in decision-making for large- scale engineering systems is necessary and crucial, both from an ethical perspective, as well as for improving the chances of success ...

Mostashari, Ali, 1974-

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Managing Stakeholder Requirements in High Performance Computing Procurement  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Managing Stakeholder Requirements in High Performance Computing Procurement John Rooksby1 , Mark Department of Management, Lancaster University High Performance Computing (HPC) facilities are provided strategy can rigorously meet the demands of the potential users. 1 Introduction High Performance Computing

Sommerville, Ian

116

Negotiating equity for management of DOE wastes  

SciTech Connect

One important factor frustrating optimal management of Department of Energy (DOE)-complex wastes is the inability to use licensed and permitted facilities systematically. Achieving the goal of optimal use of DOE`s waste management facilities is politically problematic for two reasons. First, no locale wants to bear a disproportionate burden from DOE wastes. Second, the burden imposed by additional wastes transported from one site to another is difficult to characterize. To develop a viable framework for equitably distributing these burdens while achieving efficient use of all DOE waste management facilities, several implementation and equity issues must be addressed and resolved. This paper discusses stakeholder and equity issues and proposes a framework for joint research and action that could facilitate equity negotiations among stakeholder and move toward a more optimal use of DOE`s waste management capabilities.

Carnes, S.A.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

Negotiating equity for management of DOE wastes  

SciTech Connect

One important factor frustrating optimal management of DOE-complex wastes is inability to use licensed and permitted facilities systematically. Achieving the goal of optimal use of DOE`s waste management facilities is politically problematic for two reasons. First, no locale wants to bear a disproportionate burden from DOE wastes. Second, the burden imposed by additional wastes transported from one site to another is difficult to characterize. To develop a viable framework for equitably distributing these burdens while achieving efficient use of all DOE waste management facilities, several implementation and equity issues must be addressed and resolved. This paper discusses stakeholders and equity issues and proposes a framework for joint research and action that could facilitate equity negotiations among stakeholders and move toward a more optimal use of DOE`s waste management capabilities.

Carnes, S.A.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

ENHANCING STAKEHOLDER ACCEPTANCE OF BIOREMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES  

SciTech Connect

This project inquired into the judgments and beliefs of people living near DOE reservations and facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Hanford, Washington; and Los Alamos, Tennessee about bioremediation of subsurface contamination. The purpose of the investigation was to identify strategies based on these judgments and beliefs for enhancing public support of bioremediation. Several methods were used to collect and analyze data including content analysis of transcripts of face-to-face personal interviews, factor analysis of subjective perspectives using Q methodology, and statistical analysis of results from a large-sample randomized telephone survey. Content analysis of interview transcripts identified themes about public perceptions and constructions of contamination risk, risk management, and risk managers. This analysis revealed that those who have no employment relationship at the sites and are not engaged in technical professions are most concerned about contamination risks. We also found that most interviewees are unfamiliar with subsurface contamination risks and how they can be reduced, believe they have little control over exposure, are frustrated with the lack of progress in remediation, are concerned about a lack of commitment of DOE to full remediation, and distrust site managers to act in the public interest. Concern is also expressed over frequent site management turnover, excessive secrecy, ineffective and biased communication, perceived attempts to talk the public into accepting risk, and apparent lack of concern about community welfare. In the telephone survey, we asked respondents who were aware of site contamination about their perceptions of risk from exposure to subsurface contamination. Response analysis revealed that most people believe that they are at significant risk from subsurface contamination but they acknowledge that more education is needed to calibrate risk perceptions against scientific risk assessments. Most rate their personal control over exposure as low. Slightly more than half believe that risk reduction should be balanced against cost. We also found that distrust of DOE and its contractors exists, primarily due to the perception that site managers do not share public values; hence, the public is generally unwilling to defer to DOE in its decision-making. The concomitant belief of inefficacy confounds distrust by generating frustration that DOE does not care. Moreover, the public is split with respect to trust of each other, primarily because of the belief that citizens lack technical competence. With respect to bioremediation support, we found that more than 40% of the public has no opinion. However, of those who do, 3 of 4 are favorably disposed particularly among those who believe that risk is lower and who are more trusting of site management. We presented survey respondents with four alternative participation strategies based on the results of the Q analysis and asked their judgments of each. The public prefers strategies that shifts power to them. The least empowered strategy (feedback) was supported by 46%; support grew as public power increased, reaching 66% support for independently facilitated deliberation. More DOE distrust generates more support for high power strategies. We offer the following recommendations to enhance public acceptance. First, and perhaps most importantly, site managers should pursue robust trust-building efforts to gain public confidence in DOE risk management that meets public expectations. Public trust decreases risk perception, which increases public willingness to defer to site managers discretion in decision-making, which in turn increases public acceptance of the decisions that result. Second, site managers should address public concerns about bioremediation such as its effectiveness in reducing risk, performance compared to other remediation alternatives, costs compared against benefits, time required to start and complete remediation, level of risk that is currently posed by contamination, and scope of application. Third, more should be d

Focht, Will; Albright, Matt; Anex, Robert P., Jr., ed.

2009-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

119

User satisfaction of the community education program as perceived by stakeholders in the north east independent school district in san antonio, texas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The primary purpose of this study was to determine user satisfaction of the community education program as perceived by stakeholders in North East Independent School District. A secondary purpose of this study was to examine the impact of community education support of a bond vote affecting the regular K-12 school program. Participants for the investigation were 522 stakeholders attending community education classes in North East Independent School District. Stakeholders responded to a questionnaire that provided data for this research. Research findings of this study: 1. Stakeholders participating in community education programs were found to be well satisfied with the classes they attended. 2. No difference existed in the perception of attitudes between adults 18 to 54 and those 55 and older who were taking community education classes. 3. Participation in community education classes does affect the stakeholdersâ?? attitudes toward the regular K-12 school program. Recommendations for future study: 1. Studies of this type should be conducted for adults who are not participating in community education programs within North East Independent School District to determine their educational, recreational, and vocational training needs. 2. Program staff, including administrative and instructional personnel, should receive training regarding the importance and benefits of creating learning communities. 3. A longitudinal study of stakeholders extending over several years should be undertaken to evaluate the long-term impact of community education programs.

Tharp, Twain Owens

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

From public participation to stakeholder involvement: The rocky road to more inclusiveness  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Surviving always at the edge of extinction, public participation in environmental decision making has an uncertain and problematic history. From its emergence from the urban planning and delivery system efforts of the 1960s to many siting and non-siting uses today, it remains a battleground, with few successes and many failures. While some compelling structural, organizational and cultural explanations for this state of affairs exist, the author offers a further one--a too-limited definition and vision of public participation. One then can argue for a more inclusive process such as stakeholder involvement (SI) to enable a more viable approach to decision making. One can argue that the narrow conceptualization offered in the term public participation (PP) is partly responsible for the meager results of decades of efforts by earnest practitioners. Because of the limited, unique, and self-selected publics that respond to the major PP mechanisms such as public hearings, PP has become largely the province of organized activist groups and is largely accepted as such by most parties, including PP professionals. The author reviews the roles of Congress, federal agencies/proponents, local governments, activist groups and PP professionals in creating the current limited PP processes. She discusses trends and prospects for moving to broader based, more inclusive SI approaches. The emerging SI approach presents major methodological and organizational challenges, but offers the promise of outcomes more likely to be legitimated and potentially more lasting.

Peelle, E.

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Collegiate Wind Competition  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Wind for Schools Project Wind for Schools Project Collegiate Wind Competition School Project Locations Education & Training Programs Curricula & Teaching Materials Resources Collegiate Wind Competition The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Collegiate Wind Competition challenges undergraduate students from multiple disciplines to design and construct a lightweight wind turbine. The students will investigate innovative wind energy concepts; gain experience designing, building, and testing a wind turbine to perform according to a customized, market data-derived business plan; and increase their knowledge of wind industry barriers. Illustration with a summary of the Collegiate Wind Competition and its principal contests. Challenging collegiate teams to design and construct a lightweight, transportable wind turbine to power small electric devices. Build and test a wind turbine, present on wind energy topics, and deliver a cohesive business plan.

122

Geothermal Stakeholder Feedback on the GRR | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Stakeholder Feedback on the GRR Geothermal Stakeholder Feedback on the GRR Home > Groups > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 13 December, 2012 - 10:01 feedback GRR As we head into the holiday season, we thought we'd share with you some of the feedback we've received from industry, agency, consultant and other stakeholder personnel. Thanks again to all, and Happy Holidays! General "GRR is a much needed tool for navigating the geothermal regulatory environment. It will go a long way towards facilitating more geothermal energy development." (agency) "Very impressive product. The workshop [at GRC] was very helpful and thought provoking. Participants very engaged." (industry) "Good, forward-thinking initiative. Highly needed."

123

Memorandum: Guidance for Participation of the EM SSAB, Stakeholders,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance for Participation of the EM SSAB, Guidance for Participation of the EM SSAB, Stakeholders, Regulators, and Tribal Governments in EM FY 2013 Budget Request Memorandum: Guidance for Participation of the EM SSAB, Stakeholders, Regulators, and Tribal Governments in EM FY 2013 Budget Request From: Dae Y. Chung, Principle Deputy Assistant Secretary for EM (EM-2) Subject: Guidance for Participation of the EM SSAB, Stakeholders, Regulators, and Tribal Governments in EM FY 2013 Budget Request The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit guidance for formal, routine, and structured involvement of the public; including, but not limited to, the Environmental Management (EM) Site-Specific Advisory Board (SSAB) members, state regulators , local government officials, community groups, and Tribal government officials (herein

124

DOE Technical Assistance Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii Collection of Customer Data for Better Buildings Guidelines For Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utility Keith Freischlag and Curtis Framel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project DOE Technical Assistance Program Team 4 - Program & Project Development & Implementation December 16, 2010 Guidelines for Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities Webinar Overview * Technical Assistance Program (TAP) * Discussion of Identifying Utility Stakeholders * Discussion of Procuring Customer Usage Data * Suggestions to Streamline Data Collection Processes * Overview of Data Reporting Requirements * Q&A Guidelines for Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities * Questions and discussion after presentation

125

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: About Wind Powering America  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

About About Printable Version Bookmark and Share Awards Contacts About the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Initiative This initiative is focused at advancing the appropriate deployment of wind energy systems while educating communities about the potential impacts of wind development, through supporting projects and activities: Delivering unbiased, relevant, and actionable information to policy and permitting processes, Expanding or preserving access to quality wind resources, Making decisions on wind deployment more certain and predictable for all stakeholders by reducing uncertainty around wind deployment related issues, Developing and providing tools to help communities understand the impact and benefits of potential wind development, and Supporting the development of a national wind workforce though the

126

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: State Wind Activities  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Federal, Federal, State, & Local Printable Version Bookmark and Share Economic Development Policy Public Lands Public Power Regional Activities State Activities State Lands Siting State Wind Activities The U.S. map below summarizes Wind Powering America's state activities as of February 2010, which include Wind Working Groups, validated wind maps, anemometer loan programs, small wind guides, Wind for Schools Wind Applications Centers, exhibits, and workshops or webcasts. To read more state-specific news, click on a state. You can also view an enlarged map or print the state wind activities map. U.S. map showing Wind Powering America's activities in each state. Washington has an inactive/evolved wind working group, validated wind map, and a small wind guide. Exhibits have been displayed. Oregon has a wind working group, validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts. California has an inactive/evolved wind working group and valided wind map. Exhibits have been displayed. Idaho has an inactive/evolved wind working group, validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, has had workshops or Webcasts, exhibits have been displayed, and it has a Wind for Schools Wind Applications Center. Nevada has a wind working group, validated wind map, a small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts and exhibits. Montana has a wind working group, validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts, exhibits have been displayed, and it has a Wind for Schools Wind Applications Center. Wyoming has a wind working group, validated wind map, small wind guide, anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts and exhibits. Utah has a wind working group, validated wind map, a small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts. Arizona has a wind working group, validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, has had workshops or Webcasts, and exhibits have been displayed. Colorado has a wind working group, a validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, has had workshops or Webcasts, exhibits have been displayed, and it has a Wind for Schools Wind Applications Center. New Mexico has a wind working group, validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, has had workshops or Webcasts, and exhibits have been displayed. North Dakota has a wind working group, validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts and exhibits. South Dakota has a wind working group, a validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, has had workshops or Webcasts, exhibits have been displayed, and it has a Wind for Schools Wind Applications Center. Nebraska has a wind working group, a validated wind map, a small wind guide, has had workshops or Webcasts, exhibits have been displayed, and it has a Wind for Schools Wind Applications Center. Kansas has a wind working group, a validated wind map, a small wind guide, has had workshops or Webcasts, exhibits have been displayed, and it has a Wind for Schools Wind Applications Center. Oklahoma has a wind working group, validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts. Texas currently does not have any Wind Powering America activities. Minnesota has a small wind guide. Iowa has a small wind guide and has had exhibits. Missouri has a wind working group, validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts. Arkansas has a wind working group, validated wind map, and workshops or Webcasts. Lousiana currently does not have any Wind Powering America activities. Mississippi currently does not have any Wind Powering America activities. Alabama currently does not have any Wind Powering America activities. Georgia has a wind working group, a validated wind map, and has had workshops or Webcasts. Florida currently does not have any Wind Powering America activities. South Carolina has a wind working group. Alaska has a wind working group, validated wind map, an anemometer loan program, has had workshops or Webcasts, and it has a Wind for Schools Wind Applications Center. Hawaii has a wind working group, validated wind map, a small wind guide, and has had exhibits. Puerto Rico has a validated wind map and a planned wind working group. Wisconsin has a wind working group, a small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts. Illinois has a wind working group, validated wind map, a small wind guide, and has had workshops or Webcasts. Michigan has a wind working group, validated wind map, a small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts and exhibits. Indiana has a wind working group, a validated wind map, a small wind guide, and has had workshops or Webcasts and exhibits. Kentucky has a wind working group and a validated wind map. Tennessee has a wind working group, a validated wind map, small wind guide, anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts. North Carolina has a wind working group, validated wind map, a small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, has had workshops or Webcasts, exhibits have been displayed, and it has a Wind for Schools Wind Applications Center. Virginia has a wind working group, a validated wind map, a small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, has had workshops or Webcasts, exhibits have been displayed, and it has a Wind for Schools Wind Applications Center. West Virginia has a wind working group, a validated wind map, and has had workshops or Webcasts. Ohio has a wind working group, validated wind map, a small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts. Maryland has a wind working group, a validated wind map, a small wind guide, and an anemometer loan program. Pennsylvania has a wind working group, a validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, has had workshops or Webcasts, and it has a Wind for Schools Wind Applications Center. Delaware has a validated wind map and a small wind guide. New Jersey has a wind working group, validated wind map, a small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts. Connecticut has a wind working group and a validated wind map. New York has a small wind guide. Vermont has a validated wind map and a small wind guide. Massachusetts has a wind working group, validated wind map, a small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had exhibits. New Hampshire has a validated wind map and small wind guide. Maine has a wind working group, validated wind map, small wind guide, an anemometer loan program, and has had workshops or Webcasts. Rhode Island has a validated wind map and small wind guide. The U.S. Virgin Islands have a validated wind map.

127

Hydro Stakeholder Collaboration and Public Involvement Planning Case Studies  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes nine utility case applications of the hydro stakeholder communications and public involvement tools presented in a recent EPRI report. The resulting experience can assist utilities in developing an effective public outreach program that will pay off in long-term public support for hydro relicensing and operations.

1998-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

128

Stakeholders' roles in virtual project environment: A case study  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The rising cost of resources within an organization, increasing capability of information technology, the need to conduct project at different places and availability of competent and inexpensive manpower elsewhere have promoted many companies to adopt ... Keywords: Communication, D83, Management, O22, Project of projects, Stakeholders, Virtual environment

Shaligram Pokharel

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

DOE-Idaho's Packaging and Transportation Perspective  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idaho's Packaging and Idaho's Packaging and T t ti P ti Transportation Perspective Richard Provencher Manager DOE Idaho Operations Office DOE Idaho Operations Office Presented to the DOE National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Stakeholders Forum May 12, 2011 DOE's Idaho site ships and receives a wide variety of radioactive materials 2 Engineering Test Reactor vessel excavated, transported across the site and disposed 3 Navy SNF moved from wet to dry storage storage 4 5 Left: Contact-handled TRU shipments Right: A remote-handled TRU shipment Right: A remote handled TRU shipment 6 NAC spent nuclear fuel container on its trailer, prior to installation of its impact limiters 7 Examples of dry (CPP-603) and wet (CPP-666) storage in Idaho (CPP 666) storage in Idaho 8 INL's Materials and Fuels Complex Hot Fuel Examination

130

DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Hanford Site Occupational  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Hanford Site Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Hanford Site Occupational Medical Services - Agency Solicits Input from Industry, Stakeholders, and Workforce DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals for Hanford Site Occupational Medical Services - Agency Solicits Input from Industry, Stakeholders, and Workforce July 19, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Geoff Tyree, DOE Geoffrey.Tyree@rl..doe.gov 509-376-4171 The Department of Energy today issued a Draft Request for Proposals (RFP) for an Occupational Medical Services acquisition at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The Draft RFP is one step in the process toward awarding a contract and provides an opportunity for companies, Hanford stakeholders, and the site's workforce to provide input on the Draft RFP. DOE will provide

131

Building America Spring 2012 Stakeholder Meeting Report: Austin, Texas; February 29 - March 2, 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Building America Building America Spring 2012 Stakeholder Meeting Report Austin, Texas: February 29-March 2, 2012 May 2012 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, subcontractors, or affiliated partners makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply

132

New England Wind Forum: Interviews with Wind Industry Stakeholders and  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Small Wind Small Wind Large Wind Newsletter Perspectives Events Quick Links to States CT MA ME NH RI VT Bookmark and Share Interviews With Wind Industry Stakeholders and Pioneers in New England The New England Wind Forum will interview different stakeholders actively shaping the wind power landscape in New England and wind pioneers to examine how they have laid the groundwork for today's New England wind energy market. Stephan Wollenburg, Green Energy Program Director of Energy Consumers Alliance of New England January 2013 A Panel of Seven Offer Insight into the Evolving Drivers and Challenges Facing Wind Development in New England June 2011 John Norden, Manager of Renewable Resource Integration, Independent System Operator-New England September 2010 Angus King, Former Governor of Maine and Co-Founder of Independence Wind

133

2013 US Department of Energy National Transportation Stakeholders Forum  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 US Department of Energy National Transportation 3 US Department of Energy National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Hello Everyone, It's time to register for the 2013 U.S. Department of Energy National Transportation Stakeholders Forum being held in Buffalo, New York on May 14-16. Please access the entitled link to proceed directly to the official registration website. Once you have entered the site you will be able to register for the meeting, select activities (regional/working meetings, group breakout sessions, TRANSCOM training and the West Valley tour) to attend, view the draft agenda and make lodging reservations. While the event is over two months away, please register at your earliest opportunity as it will greatly

134

Energy Department Partners with State, City and Industry Stakeholders to  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Partners with State, City and Industry Partners with State, City and Industry Stakeholders to Help Hoboken Region Improve Its Electric Grid in the Aftermath of Hurricane Sandy Energy Department Partners with State, City and Industry Stakeholders to Help Hoboken Region Improve Its Electric Grid in the Aftermath of Hurricane Sandy June 13, 2013 - 1:29pm Addthis NEWS MEDIA CONTACT (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON - As part of the Obama Administration's ongoing commitment to provide support to communities affected by Hurricane Sandy, the Energy Department today announced that it will partner with the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, City of Hoboken and Public Service Electric & Gas Company (PSE&G) to help assess and develop strategies for improving the reliability and resiliency of the local electric grid in Hoboken. The

135

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Perspectives: Personal Interviews With  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Perspectives: Perspectives: Personal Interviews With Wind Industry Stakeholders, Pioneers, Advocates, and Electric Cooperatives Wind Powering America interviewed various industry stakeholders to show different perspectives of wind energy's value. Wind Powering America also interviewed wind pioneers to examine how they have laid the groundwork for today's U.S. wind energy market. These interviews are one of a kind and provide an insider view of how the wind industry has evolved and is influenced today. Wind Powering America is also interviewing Native Americans to examine their experiences and future plans. Finally, included, are wind power advocate interviews, electric cooperative interviews, and public power pioneer interviews. Public Power Wind Pioneer Interviews Photo of Patricia Bigner and Phil Dougherty

136

Identifying Stakeholders, Applications and Impacts of AMI Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Utilities are eager to understand what the impacts and benefits are from advanced metering infrastructure (AMI). There have been many cost benefit studies done on AMI but very little information is available on realized benefits and actual costs from AMI deployments. In 2013 the IntelliGrid program will launch a project document the applications, impacts, value chains, benefits and costs of AMI deployments. This paper provides background information for this project by defining the stakeholders in ...

2012-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

137

DER Stakeholder Collaboration at Work: Shaping a California DER Procurement  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes a 2004 pilot project in which stakeholders collaborated to help Southern California Edison (SCE) comply with a 2003 California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Order to evaluate distributed generation (DG) as an alternative to distribution system upgrades, and develop a procurement approach and model contract that could serve that purpose. Its overall intent was to support SCEs objectives to design a DG procurement process consistent with CPUC directives that would meet the needs ...

2006-06-28T23:59:59.000Z

138

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For June 19 to July 12, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

July 12, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

139

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 26 to June 14, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

June 14, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

140

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 17 to June 6, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

June 6, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 25 to May 14, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

May 14, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

142

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For July 21 to Aug. 3, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Aug. 3, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

143

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For December 27, 2011 to January...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

23, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

144

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For November 29 to December 26,...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

26, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

145

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For September 10 to October 1, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oct. 1, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

146

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For December 20 to January 10, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

147

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For August 3 to August 21, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Aug. 21, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

148

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For August 24 to September 12, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

12, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

149

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Nov. 10 to Nov. 23, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nov. 23, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

150

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For October 2 to October 22, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oct. 22, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

151

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For July 20 to August 2, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

August 2, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

152

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 6 to May 24, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

May 24, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

153

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Nov. 24 to Dec. 8, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dec. 8, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

154

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For November 8 to November 28, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

28, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

155

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For February 15 to March 7, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

March 7, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

156

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For July 7 to July 20, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

July 20, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

157

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For August 22 to September 10, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sept. 10, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

158

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 28 to May 11, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

May 11, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

159

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Jan. 5 to Jan. 18, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Jan. 18, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

160

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For January 24, 2012 to February...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For July 19 to August 8, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

August 8, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

162

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 11 to April 25, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

April 25, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

163

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For June 28 to July 18, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

July 18, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

164

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Dec. 9 to Dec. 21, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dec. 21, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

165

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 20 to May 5, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to May 5, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

166

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 26 to May 16, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

May 16, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more...

167

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

June 5, 2013 June 5, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period May 16, through May 30, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC - Shannon Brennan, DOE-ID, (208) 526-3993. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) [No items to Report] Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) May 15 - 30, 2013: CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC discovered three instances of new information at the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) which have the potential to impact the nuclear safety analysis

168

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

January 6, 2014 January 6, 2014 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period November 01, 2013 through November 30, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Nothing to Report Notable Accomplishments: Contracting companies supporting EM's cleanup program and the Office of Nuclear Energy at the Idaho site volunteered to be among the first to use a new DOE

169

DOE Science Showcase - Wind Power  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Science Showcase - Wind Power DOE Science Showcase - Wind Power Wind Powering America Wind Powering America is a nationwide initiative of the U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Program designed to educate, engage, and enable critical stakeholders to make informed decisions about how wind energy contributes to the U.S. electricity supply. Wind Power Research Results in DOE Databases IEA Wind Task 26: The Past and Future Cost of Wind Energy, Work Package 2, Energy Citations Database NREL Triples Previous Estimates of U.S. Wind Power Potential, Energy Citations Database Dynamic Models for Wind Turbines and Wind Power Plants, DOE Information Bridge 2012 ARPA-E Energy Innovation Summit: Profiling General Compression: A River of Wind, ScienceCinema, multimedia Solar and Wind Energy Resource Assessment (SWERA) Data from the

170

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

26, 2013 26, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period July 29, 2013 through August 12, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) July 31, 2013: The Idaho Treatment Group, LLC (ITG), the managing contractor for the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project received a warning letter from the State of Idaho's Department of Environmental quality regarding self- reported RCRA permit violations which

171

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

18, 2013 18, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period September 30, 2013 through October 31, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) October 15, 2013: A manager at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) determined that the AMWTP Safety Analysis process required review due to an operational trend of fire/combustion events in the Treatment Facility (TF) box lines. Safety analysis for the TF is

172

DOE Order 440. 1 B: Worker Protection Program for DOE (Including NNSA)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0. 1 B: Worker Protection Program for DOE (Including 0. 1 B: Worker Protection Program for DOE (Including NNSA) Federal Employees DOE Order 440. 1 B: Worker Protection Program for DOE (Including NNSA) Federal Employees Stakeholders: DOE and NNSA employees Scope: DOE Order 440.1 B establishes the framework for an effective worker protection program that will reduce or prevent injuries, illnesses, and accidental losses by providing Department of Energy, including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Federal workers with a safe and healthful workplace. Summary: Among the requirements of DOE Order 440.1 B, the Department must provide its employees, including NNSA, a number of protections relating to whistle blowing guidelines. The relevant section of requirements includes: 4. REQUIREMENTS. DOE elements must:

173

The DOE s In-Plant Training (INPLT) Model to Promote Energy Efficiency in the Industrial Sector  

SciTech Connect

In-Plant Training (INPLT) is a new model for developing energy efficiency expertise within the US manufacturing companies participating in the U.S. Department of Energy s (DOE s) Better Buildings, Better Plants Program-a nationwide initiative to drive a 25% reduction in industrial energy intensity in 10 years. INPLTs are designed to fill a market niche by providing hands on training in a real world manufacturing plant environment. Through INPLTs, participants from multiple manufacturing plants, supply chains, utilities, and other external stakeholders learn how to conduct energy assessments, use energy analysis tools to analyze energy saving opportunities, develop energy management systems, and implement energy savings projects. Typical INPLT events are led by DOE-certified Energy Experts and range from 2-4 days. Topics discussed include: identification of cross-cutting or system specific opportunities; introduction to ISO 50001 Energy Management Systems; and energy project implementation and replication. This model is flexible, and can be tailored to suit the needs of specific industries. The INPLTs are a significant departure from the traditional single plant energy assessment model previously employed by DOE. INPLTs shift the focus from the concept of a single-plant s energy profile to a broader focus on training and capacity building among multiple industrial participants. The objective is to enable trainees to identify, quantify, implement and replicate future energy saving projects without continued external assistance. This paper discusses the INPLT model and highlights some of the initial outcomes from the successfully delivered INPLTs and the overall impact in terms of numbers of plants/participants trained, impacted energy footprints, and potential replication of identified opportunities.

Alkadi, Nasr E [ORNL; Nimbalkar, Sachin U [ORNL; De Fontaine, Mr. Andre [United States Department of Energy (DOE), Industrial Technology Program; Schoeneborn, Fred C [ORNL

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

About DOE Green Energy  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

About DOE Green Energy Search DOE Green Energy to find publicly available bibliographic citations, technical reports and patent information on different types of renewable energy resources and energy conservation, such as solar, wind, bioenergy, hydroelectric and geothermal. For example, R&D on different types of vehicle technology, as well as studies regarding electricity and other power sources, are available. Subject areas include but are not limited to hydrogen, solar energy, tidal and wave power, energy storage, and direct energy conversion. When you search the Green Energy portal, your keyword query will be mapped to scientific concepts. This semantic technique, called "keyword to concept" mapping, is applied to your search behind the scenes and helps hone your search for more efficient knowledge access and discovery. This means that you will receive results that allow you to explore more narrow concepts, related concepts, or even broader concepts. DOE Green Energy affords you the use of the familiar and simple search box - yet still provides the benefits of an advanced search technology to help get at the information you need.

175

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Resources and Tools for Siting Wind  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Federal, Federal, State, & Local Printable Version Bookmark and Share Economic Development Policy Public Lands Public Power Regional Activities State Activities State Lands Siting Resources & Tools Resources for Siting Wind Turbines This page lists information resources such as publications, websites, and news for siting wind turbines. Search the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's Database Choose a Type of Information All News Publications Web Resource Videos Choose # of Records per Page Default (10 per page) 5 25 50 To search the titles, enter a word or phrase. Start Search Clear Contents Total of 39 records found. Page 1 of 8, Sorted by descending date Filtered by: Siting 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Page >> Date sort by ascending date sort by descending date State sort by ascending state sort by descending state Type of Information Program Area Title sort by ascending title sort by descending title

176

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Resources for Public Lands  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Resources Public Power Regional Activities State Activities State Lands Siting Resources for Public Lands This page lists wind-related resources and tools such as publications, Web resources, and news about public lands. Search the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's Database Choose a Type of Information All News Publications Web Resource Videos Choose # of Records per Page Default (10 per page) 5 25 50 To search the titles, enter a word or phrase. Start Search Clear Contents Total of 24 records found. Page 1 of 5, Sorted by descending date Filtered by: Public Lands 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page >> Date sort by ascending date sort by descending date State sort by ascending state sort by descending state Type of Information Program Area Title sort by ascending title sort by descending title

177

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Wind Economic Development Resources  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Development Resources and Tools Development Resources and Tools This page lists wind-related economic development resources and tools such as publications, Web resources, and news. Search the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's Database Choose a Type of Information All News Publications Web Resource Videos Choose # of Records per Page Default (10 per page) 5 25 50 To search the titles, enter a word or phrase. Start Search Clear Contents Total of 198 records found. Page 1 of 40, Sorted by descending date Filtered by: Econ. Dev. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Next Page >> Date sort by ascending date sort by descending date State sort by ascending state sort by descending state Type of Information Program Area Title sort by ascending title sort by descending title

178

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Wind Resource Maps and Anemometer Loan  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Maps & Data Maps & Data Printable Version Bookmark and Share Utility-Scale Land-Based Maps Offshore Maps Community-Scale Maps Residential-Scale Maps Anemometer Loan Programs & Data Wind Resource Maps and Anemometer Loan Program Data The Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative provides wind maps and validation to help states and regions build capacity to support and accelerate wind energy deployment. Read about the available wind maps for utility-, community-, and residential-scale wind development. A wind resource map of the United States showing land-based with offshore resources. The Energy Department, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and AWS Truepower provide the wind resource map that shows land-based with offshore resources. This map is the first to provide wind developers and policy

179

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Wind Farm Economic Impact Studies  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Information Information Resources Printable Version Bookmark and Share Publications Success Stories Webinars Podcasts Videos Stakeholder Interviews Lessons Learned Wind Working Groups Economic Impact Studies Wind Turbine Ordinances Wind Farm Economic Impact Studies Wind Powering America compiled studies about the economic impact of wind farms in rural communities in order to compared them side by side. The studies explore the types of information gathered when undertaking an economic impact study, what kind of information is most helpful in using these studies to further promote wind energy development in rural communities, and the limitations on collecting data for these studies. Pedden, M. (September 2004). "Analysis: Economic Impacts of Wind Applications in Rural Communities." Overview of data collection and

180

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Policy Resources and Tools  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Policy Resources and Tools Policy Resources and Tools This page lists wind-related policy resources and tools such as publications, Web resources, and news. Search the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's Database Choose a Type of Information All News Publications Web Resource Videos Choose # of Records per Page Default (10 per page) 5 25 50 To search the titles, enter a word or phrase. Start Search Clear Contents Total of 120 records found. Page 1 of 24, Sorted by descending date Filtered by: Policy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next Page >> Date sort by ascending date sort by descending date State sort by ascending state sort by descending state Type of Information Program Area Title sort by ascending title sort by descending title

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Education and School Resources  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Education and School Resources Education and School Resources Filter the Wind Powering America database for information resources about Wind for Schools, education and training programs, news, and educational links. Search the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's Database Choose a Type of Information All News Publications Web Resource Videos Choose # of Records per Page Default (10 per page) 5 25 50 To search the titles, enter a word or phrase. Start Search Clear Contents Total of 139 records found. Page 1 of 28, Sorted by descending date Filtered by: Schools 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next Page >> Date sort by ascending date sort by descending date State sort by ascending state sort by descending state Type of Information Program Area Title sort by ascending title sort by descending title

182

Wall Street vs. Main Street: Firm Strategies for Defending Legitimacy and Their Impact on Different Stakeholders  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We assess the effect of firm strategies to defend legitimacy on two different stakeholder groupsthe public (Main Street) and the investment community (Wall Street). We identify four types of firm strategies in response ... Keywords: crisis response, legitimacy, stakeholder theory, stigma management, thought worlds

Anna Lamin; Srilata Zaheer

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

Microsoft Word - Summary and Guide for Stakeholders 01-03-11 AFD.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

423 423 January 2011 F F inal inal Lo Lo ng- ng- T T e e r r m m M M a a n n a a g g e e me me nt a nt a n n d d S S t t or or a a g g e e of of El El e e m m en en t t a a l l M M e e rc rc u u r r y y En En vironmental Impac vironmental Impac t Statement t Statement Summary and Guide for Stakeholders U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Washington, DC For additional information on this Final Mercury Storage EIS, contact: AVAILABILITY OF THIS FINAL LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE OF ELEMENTAL MERCURY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT David Levenstein, Document Manager Office of Environmental Compliance (EM-41) U.S. Department of Energy Post Office Box 2612 Germantown, MD 20874 Website: http://www.mercurystorageeis.com Fax: 877-274-5462 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Cover Sheet Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

184

Rocky Flats Closure: the Role of Models in Facilitating Scientific Communication With Stakeholder Groups  

SciTech Connect

The Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) was a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) environmental cleanup site for a previous manufacturing plant that made components for the U.S. nuclear weapons arsenal. The facility was shut down in 1989 to address environmental and safety concerns, and left behind a legacy of contaminated facilities, soils, surface and ground water. In 1995, the Site contractor established the Actinide Migration Evaluation (AME) advisory group to provide advice and technical expertise on issues of actinide behavior and mobility in the air, surface water, groundwater, and soil. Through a combination of expert judgment supported by state-of-the-art scientific measurements, it was shown that under environmental conditions at Rocky Flats, plutonium and americium form insoluble oxides that adhere to small soil, organic, and mineral particles and colloids, or are colloidal materials themselves. A series of models ranging from conceptual, geostatistical, and large-scale wind and surface water erosion models were used to guide stakeholder interactions. The nature of these models, and their use in public communication is described.

Clark, D.L.; Choppin, G.R.; Dayton, C.S.; Janecky, D.R.; Lane, L.J.; Paton, I.

2009-05-28T23:59:59.000Z

186

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hallam  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Nebraska Nebraska Hallam, Nebraska, Decommissioned Reactor Site A D&D Program Site hallam_map As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Hallam Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Hallam site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Inspection/Sampling Schedule Hallam Decommissioned Reactor Site Mapping and Monitoring (GEMS)

187

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Agricultural and Rural Resources and  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Agricultural and Rural Resources and Tools Agricultural and Rural Resources and Tools This page lists resources and tools specifically for the agricultural community. Currently the page lists an online calculator that provides quick, detailed economic evaluation of potential utility-scale wind energy projects and the page links to other Web sites. Search the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative's Database Choose a Type of Information All News Publications Web Resource Videos Choose # of Records per Page Default (10 per page) 5 25 50 To search the titles, enter a word or phrase. Start Search Clear Contents Total of 137 records found. Page 1 of 28, Sorted by descending date Filtered by: Agricultural 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next Page >> Date sort by ascending date sort by descending date State sort by ascending state sort by descending state Type of Information Program Area Title sort by ascending title sort by descending title

188

Safeguards-By-Design: Guidance and Tools for Stakeholders  

SciTech Connect

Effective implementation of the Safeguards-by-Design (SBD) approach can help meet the challenges of global nuclear energy growth, by designing facilities that have improved safeguardability and reduced safeguards-related life cycle costs. The ultimate goal of SBD is to implement effective and efficient safeguards that reduce the burden to both the facility operator and the International Atomic Energy Agency. Since 2008, the National Nuclear Security Administration's Next Generation Safeguards Initiative's Safeguards By Design Project has initiated multiple studies and workshops with industry and regulatory stakeholders, including the IAEA, to develop relevant documents to support the implementation of SBD. These 'Good Practices Guides' describe facility and process design features that will facilitate implementation of effective nuclear material safeguards starting in the earliest phases of design through to final design. These guides, which are in their final editorial stages, start at a high level and then narrow down to specific nuclear fuel cycle facilities such as Light Water Reactors, Generation III/IV Reactors, High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors, and Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Plants. Most recently, NGSI has begun development of a facility safeguardability assessment toolkit to assist the designer. This paper will review the current status of these efforts, provide some examples of these documents, and show some standard IAEA Unattended Instrumentation that is permanently installed in nuclear facilities for monitoring.

Mark Schanfein; Shirley Johnson

2012-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

DOE Online  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fermilab's Science Adventures! Fermilab's Science Adventures! DOE Online K-12 Instructional Resources ed.fnal.gov/doe/ The U.S. Department of Energy is committed to helping educate our nation's next generation of scientists. The following resources help teachers integrate the Internet into K-12 classroom instruction. DOE Labs General Instructional Units Online Resources Lesson Plans General References DOE Laboratory and Facility Education Home Pages (www-ed.fnal.gov/doe/doe_labs.html) Direct links for 27 education Websites at DOE national laboratories and facilities. Online Catalog (www-ed.fnal.gov/trc/library) Fermilab's Teacher Resource Center collection of 10,000+ PreK-12 instructional materials in science, mathematics and technology. Materials include tradebooks, curriculum materials, educational

190

Strategic management for large engineering projects : the stakeholder value network approach  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A critical element of the challenges and opportunities for today's large engineering projects are associated with the multi-type and networked relationships between these projects and their various stakeholders. This ...

Feng, Wen, Ph. D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

191

Mitigating New York City's Heat Island: Integrating Stakeholder Perspectives and Scientific Evaluation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This study of New York City, New York's, heat island and its potential mitigation was structured around research questions developed by project stakeholders working with a multidisciplinary team of researchers. Meteorological, remotely-sensed, ...

Cynthia Rosenzweig; William D. Solecki; Jennifer Cox; Sara Hodges; Lily Parshall; Barry Lynn; Richard Goldberg; Stuart Gaffin; Ronald B. Slosberg; Peter Savio; Mark Watson; Frank Dunstan

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

192

An interactive, online Geographic Information System (GIS) for stakeholder participation in environmental site selection  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

An interactive, online geographic information system (GIS) was developed to enhance the involvement of stakeholders in the public participation processes of site selection issues in the marine environment. Displaying ...

Adams, Christiaan Scott, 1973-

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

Climate Hazard Assessment for Stakeholder Adaptation Planning in New York City  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper describes a time-sensitive approach to climate change projections that was developed as part of New York Citys climate change adaptation process and that has provided decision support to stakeholders from 40 agencies, regional planning ...

Radley M. Horton; Vivien Gornitz; Daniel A. Bader; Alex C. Ruane; Richard Goldberg; Cynthia Rosenzweig

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

Trading zones : cooperating for water resource and ecosystem management when stakeholders have apparently irreconcilable differences  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Disputes over the management of water resources in the United States often seem irreconcilable because stakeholders' differences in values, beliefs, and identities are so hard to resolve. Yet, while many efforts to resolve ...

Fuller, Boyd

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

EAC Recommendations for DOE Action on PMAs - June 18, 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EAC Recommendations for DOE Action Regarding the EAC Recommendations for DOE Action Regarding the Power Marketing Administrations June 18, 2012 The Electricity Advisory Committee ("EAC") recommends that the Department of Energy ("DOE") encourage the Western Area Power Administration ("WAPA") and the Southwestern Power Administration ("SWPA") to exercise their authority under Section 1222 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ("EPAct"), following consultation with their preference customers and other stakeholders. Pursuant to that provision, WAPA and SWPA can accept funding from third parties for new transmission projects and transmission upgrades, consistent with transmission needs identified by the appropriate transmission organization or approved regional reliability organization.

196

DOE Learning & Development Competency Governance Structure Senior HC Leadership  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Learning & Development Learning & Development Competency Governance Structure Senior HC Leadership HC DOE L&D BOD HC-20 Other HR Functions (e.g. Staffing) (Competency Steward) Competency Management HC-23 Other DOE Working and Users Groups Lead Competency Stakeholders (CMWG and CMUG) Management Program (e.g. Union Reps, (CMP) to ensure validity and career & professional consistency of competencies development programs Lead Implementation and Operation of automated Competency Management System (CMS) Competency Steward -Supplies HR/Competency Development subject matter expertise -Maintains DOE Competency Framework and Competency Dictionary to ensure common, valid approaches are used to develop and

197

DOE-2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

standards in the U.S. and other countries. DOE-2 is also the basis of numerous handbooks on energy-efficient buildings and building components. Many design and consulting...

198

DOE017-0153  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5525 5525 DOE017-0153 ,-.or/ N"( - ./,'-'S MaryBeth Zimmerman 02/14/2001 11:08AM / -- T ' ,44 L - ( _w _1_'- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .I f . J To: Kenneth Friedman/EE/DOE@DOE, Peggy Podolak/EE/DOE@DOE, Linda Silverman/EE/DOE@DOE, Ed Wall/EE/DOE@DOE, David RodgerslEE/DOE@DOE, Jerry DionlEE/DOE@DOE, Gail McKinley/EE/DOE@DOE. Lawrence MansuetifEE/DOE@DOE cc: John Sullivan/EE/DOE@DOE. Darrell Beschen/EEIDOE@DOE, Michael York/EE/DOE@DOE, Buddy GarlandlEEIDOE@DOE, Nancy Jefferv/EEIDOE@DOE, Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE. Sam Baldwin/EE/DOE@DOE, IEE-ADAS Subject: FW: NEP Draft outline Directions on NEP Assessment paper. Please read all of this very carefully before proceeding: Product Schedule: * Inputs due from sectors to Planning: COB on Thursday (sorry) o Due from EERE to Policy Office: noon on Friday

199

DOE Issues Energy Sector Cyber Organization NOI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Issues National Energy Sector Cyber Organization Notice of Intent Issues National Energy Sector Cyber Organization Notice of Intent February 11, 2010 The Department of Energy's (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) announced on Jan. 7 that it intends to issue a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) for a National Energy Sector Cyber Organization, envisioned as a partnership between the federal government and energy sector stakeholders to protect the bulk power electric grid and aid the integration of smart grid technology to enhance the security of the grid. The cyber organization is expected to have the knowledge, expertise, capabilities, and capacity, at a minimum to: * Identify and prioritize cyber security research and development issues.

200

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Wind Power on State Lands  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Wind Power on State Lands Wind Power on State Lands Wind development can be an attractive revenue option for states that have viable wind resources on their trust lands. Wind can provide much higher revenue per acre than many other sources of typical revenue. An added benefit is that harvesting the wind does not deplete any finite resources. Several state land offices are already pursuing wind development on state trust lands. The first such wind project, in west Texas, is a joint project by the Texas General Land Office and the Lower Colorado River Authority, a public utility in central Texas. Wind Powering America Assistance to State Land Offices Analysis of State Land Potential NREL can assist state land offices in analyzing their trust lands for wind development potential. By overlaying wind resource maps with land use,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Incorporating Wind in Cap and Trade  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Incorporating Wind in Cap and Trade Programs Incorporating Wind in Cap and Trade Programs There are various methods of allocating allowances to renewable energy sources under cap and trade programs, such as renewable energy set asides and output-based approaches. Background materials and presentations from the January 12, 2006 Webcast below, provide information on why it is important to include wind and other renewables in cap and trade programs and how best to incorporate them. Implications of Carbon Regulation for Green Power Markets Bird, L.; Holt, E.; Carroll, G. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, April 2007. January 12, 2006 Webcast: Incorporating Renewable Energy under the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Co-Sponsors American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) U.S. DOE/NREL Wind Powering America

202

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Funding School Wind Projects  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Funding School Wind Projects Funding School Wind Projects Securing funding for school wind installations can be challenging in today's economy. Although the DOE's Wind for Schools project ended on September 30, 2013, the following examples of methods used to fund Wind for Schools projects may be applicable for funding other wind turbine installations at schools. Photo of children in front of a school. PIX17945 Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning presented a $16,000 check for the Wind for Schools project at the Pleasanton High School on September 15, 2010. Pleasanton is one of several Nebraska schools receiving money from a SEP environmental grant fund funded by fines from polluters. Federal Funds In addition to funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, many Wind for Schools projects have received federal grants. The United States

203

GRR 2nd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR 2nd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting GRR 2nd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Home > Groups > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 2 May, 2013 - 14:06 analysis Categorical Exclusions Coordinating Permit Office Cost Mechanisms Cost Recovery geothermal NEPA permitting quarterly meeting White Papers Last week, we held the GRR Stakeholder Update at the Denver Renaissance Hotel in Denver, CO. The meeting was well-attended with over 50 attendees, including in-person and webinar attendance. Thanks to all who attended! Presentation During the meeting, we reviewed the current status of the GRR efforts, including: * Roadmap Development: expansion to Colorado and Texas * Regulatory Analyses: including NEPA, Funding Mechanisms, and Permit Coordination Offices

204

GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Home > Groups > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 9 July, 2013 - 20:57 Alaska analysis appropriations Categorical Exclusions Coordinating Permit Office Cost Mechanisms Cost Recovery geothermal Hawaii NEPA permitting quarterly meeting White Papers On June 26th, we held the 3rd Quarter GRR Stakeholder Update at the Grand Sierra Resort in Reno, NV. The meeting was well-attended with over 40 attendees, including in-person and webinar attendance. Thanks to all who attended! Presentation During the meeting, we reviewed the current status of the GRR efforts, including: * Roadmap Development: expansion to Colorado and Texas - both sets of flowcharts are developed and available online!

205

The Community Environmental Monitoring Program: Reducing Public Perception of Risk through Stakeholder Involvement  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Community Environmental Monitoring Program (CEMP) has promoted stakeholder involvement, awareness, and understanding of radiological surveillance in communities surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS) since 1981. It involves stakeholders in the operation, data collection, and dissemination of information obtained from a network of 29 stations across a wide area of Nevada, Utah and California. It is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administrations Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) and administered by the Desert Research Institute (DRI) of the Nevada System of Higher Education. Integration of a near real-time communications system, a public web site, training workshops for involved stakeholders, and educational programs all help to alleviate public perception of risk of health effects from past activities conducted at the NTS.

William T. Hartwell

2007-05-21T23:59:59.000Z

206

DOE HANDBOOK  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Handbook on Overseas Assignments Handbook on Overseas Assignments United States Department of Energy Office of Human Capital Management July 2013 2 Introduction This handbook covers all types of Federal employment overseas, including details, both within DOE as well as to other agencies; transfers to approved international organizations; assignments to permanent DOE positions; cost-free experts; and personal services agreements (PSAs). This handbook contains information, guidance, sample service agreements, and related documentation that are to be used to implement the following directives: a. Executive Order 11552, Providing for Details and Transfers of Federal Employees to International Organizations at http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/11552.html;

207

DOE Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

208

DOE Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

772 772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

209

DOE/EERE OBP December 29, 2010 Page | 1 Algae Biomass Supply  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) of the total 36-BGY RFS2 biofuels production target by 2022. Fuels derived from algal biomass qualify for Biofuels Production Research, Development, and Demonstration (RD&D) Description: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is seeking input from industry, academia, and other biofuels stakeholders regarding supply

Reuter, Martin

210

Method and Tools to Support Stakeholder Engagement in Policy Development: The OCOPOMO Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Good governance and open government principles require more participative, open, transparent, accountable, and collaborative. However, in public policy development, the negligence of these principles loomed particularly large until recently. In consequence, ... Keywords: Agent-Based Modelling, Good Governance Principles, Open Collaboration, Policy Development, Scenario Building, Stakeholder Involvement

Maria Wimmer; Sabrina Scherer; Scott Moss; Melanie Bicking

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

Stakeholder-Assisted Modeling and Policy Design Process for Engineering Systems Ali Mostashari  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

decision-making, and explored its merits and drawbacks in applying it to the Cape Wind offshore wind energy and Islands Renewable Energy Planning project. The Cape Wind case study showed that a stakeholder 1.3 Dissertation Objective: A Better Engineering Systems Decision-making Process...25 1

de Weck, Olivier L.

212

Stakeholder driven update and improvement of a national water resources model  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

It is generally acknowledged that water management must be based on an integrated approach, considering the entire freshwater cycle. This has in particularly been endorsed in Europe by the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) imposing integrated ... Keywords: Denmark, Groundwater, Integrated modelling, Model updating, National model, Stakeholder involvement

Anker Lajer HJberg; Lars Troldborg; Simon Stisen; Britt B. S. Christensen; Hans JRgen Henriksen

2013-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

Socially responsible modeling: a stakeholder approach to the implementation of ethical modeling in operations research  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A common dilemma for modelers in operations research (OR) involves how to construct ethically sensitive models. Concern for ethical modeling has recently become more widespread in the OR literature. Arguably, however, this concern has not manifested ... Keywords: Decision making, Ethics, Management science, Operations research, Social performance, Stakeholders

Matthew J. Drake; Virginia W. Gerde; David M. Wasieleski

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

214

Terms of Reference Stakeholder Engagement Plan SE-24 Report Site Transition Working Group  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This Terms of Reference was prepared to ensure a mutual understanding of objectives and process. This working group has been established to provide stakeholders the opportunity for input and feedback to the IESO on the impact on their business to accommodate a change in the report format, move to a single location for report retrieval and the restructuring of the reports to improve report

unknown authors

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

215

How does participation in the framing, review, and incorporation of scientific information affect stakeholder perspectives on resource management decisions?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The conventional environmental impact statement (EIS) decision-making process, governed by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), represents the prevailing practice with regard to public involvement in science-intensive ...

Peyser, Jennifer Leigh

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

216

Incorporating Stakeholder Decision Support Needs into an Integrated Regional Earth System Model  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A new modeling effort exploring the opportunities, constraints, and interactions between mitigation and adaptation at regional scale is utilizing stakeholder engagement in an innovative approach to guide model development and demonstration, including uncertainty characterization, to effectively inform regional decision making. This project, the integrated Regional Earth System Model (iRESM), employs structured stakeholder interactions and literature reviews to identify the most relevant adaptation and mitigation alternatives and decision criteria for each regional application of the framework. The information is used to identify important model capabilities and to provide a focus for numerical experiments. This paper presents the stakeholder research results from the first iRESM pilot region. The pilot region includes the Great Lakes Basin in the Midwest portion of the United States as well as other contiguous states. This geographic area (14 states in total) permits cohesive modeling of hydrologic systems while also providing gradients in climate, demography, land cover/land use, and energy supply and demand. The results from the stakeholder research indicate that iRESM should prioritize addressing adaptation alternatives in the water resources, urban infrastructure, and agriculture sectors, such as water conservation, expanded water quality monitoring, altered reservoir releases, lowered water intakes, urban infrastructure upgrades, increased electric power reserves in urban areas, and land use management/crop selection changes. Regarding mitigation alternatives, the stakeholder research shows a need for iRESM to focus on policies affecting the penetration of renewable energy technologies, and the costs and effectiveness of energy efficiency, bioenergy production, wind energy, and carbon capture and sequestration.

Rice, Jennie S.; Moss, Richard H.; Runci, Paul J.; Anderson, K. L.; Malone, Elizabeth L.

2012-03-21T23:59:59.000Z

217

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Piqua  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio Ohio Piqua, Ohio, Decommissioned Reactor Site A D&D Program Site piqua_map As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Piqua Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Piqua site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Inspection/Sampling Schedule Piqua Decommissioned Reactor Site Mapping and Monitoring (GEMS) Last Updated: 6/13/2011

218

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bonus  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Boiling Nuclear Superheater (BONUS), Puerto Rico, Decommissioned Reactor Site La Antiqua Central Nuclear de Aqua Hirviente Sobrecalentada Reactor Fuera de Servico Activo A D&D Program Site bonus_map3 As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Boiling Nuclear Superheater (BONUS) Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2004 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the BONUS site, view the fact sheet.

219

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Columbus  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Columbus, Ohio, Sites Columbus, Ohio, Sites Other Regulatory Framework columbusClosure2013 The Columbus, Ohio, Sites consist of two separate properties owned by the Battelle Memorial Institute: the King Avenue site, located in the city of Columbus, and the West Jefferson site, located approximately 15 miles west of Columbus. Battelle conducted extensive nuclear research at both locations for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies between 1943 and 1986. The facilities have been decontaminated and released for unrestricted use. Responsibility for maintaining records for the Columbus sites transferred to DOE's Office of Legacy Management in 2008. The sites require records management and stakeholder support. For more information about the Columbus sites, view the fact sheet.

220

DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award April 19, 2006 - 10:21am Addthis Vice President Cheney Presents DOE contractor with the nation's highest Presidential honor for performance excellence and quality achievement WASHINGTON, DC - Vice President Richard Cheney today presented DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company, operator of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), with the 2005 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The Baldrige award is the nation's highest Presidential honor for performance excellence and quality achievement and is presented annually to organizations that distinguish themselves through management excellence and continuous improvement to stakeholders.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

DOE Strengthens Collaboration at Intergovernmental Meeting | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Strengthens Collaboration at Intergovernmental Meeting DOE Strengthens Collaboration at Intergovernmental Meeting DOE Strengthens Collaboration at Intergovernmental Meeting December 20, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Senior Advisor for Environmental Management David Huizenga, left, provides an update on the EM program at the recent Intergovernmental Meeting with the DOE as California Office of the Attorney General Supervising Deputy Attorney General Brian Hembacher listens. Senior Advisor for Environmental Management David Huizenga, left, provides an update on the EM program at the recent Intergovernmental Meeting with the DOE as California Office of the Attorney General Supervising Deputy Attorney General Brian Hembacher listens. NEW ORLEANS - EM and stakeholders met to discuss and collaborate on issues impacting nuclear cleanup across the complex. More than 150 people

222

March 16, 2010, DOE Union Roundtable - Meeting Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010: DOE Roundtable with Labor Unions 2010: DOE Roundtable with Labor Unions Meeting Summary "Our objective is to enhance productivity and achieve the Department's mission goals while maintaining the highest standards of safe and secure operations at our facilities." Daniel Poneman, Deputy Secretary of Energy Deputy Secretary Poneman held a DOE/Union roundtable discussion with 13 labor union representatives on March 16 to engage worker stakeholders in the Department's Safety and Security Reform efforts. DOE Under Secretaries Tom D'Agostino (NNSA), Dr. Steven Koonin (Science) and Dr. Kristina Johnson (Energy and Environment) were in attendance to provide Line perspectives. Glenn Podonsky, Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer, who is tasked with assisting in a DOE

223

CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments highlighting four issues: 1. DOE's Regulatory Coordination & Harmonization Responsibilities; 2. The Cumulative Costs of Regulations; 3. Retrospective Review of Regulations; and 4. Stakeholder Participation. DOE REGULATORY COORDINATION & HARMONIZATION RESPONSIBILITIES

224

DOE Code:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

we1rbox installatiOn we1rbox installatiOn ____:....;...=.~;;....:..;=-+- DOE Code: - - !- Project Lead: Wes R1esland NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY J 3-24-10 1 Date: Project Information 1. Project Overview What are tne enwonmental mpacts? Contractor~~ _ _ _ _ ] 11 The purpose of this project is to prepare a pad for a 90 ton crane to get 1nto positiOn and ng up so we can 1 set our new weir box into position We will widen the existing road around 20 feet at the north end and taper our fill to about5 feet at the south end for a total of about 200 feeL and budd a near level pad for them tong up the crane on We will use the d1rt from the hill irnrnedJateiy north of the work to oe done 2. 3 4 What*s the legal location? What IS the durabon of the prOJed?

225

DOE F  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

420.2 420.2 All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Burden Disclosure Statement Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Records Management Division, IM-11 GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20585; and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), Washington, DC 20503. U.S. Department of Energy Personal Property Loan Agreement DOE-PMR 109-1.5103 1. CONTROL

226

DOE Onboarding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

One-Year Passport to Success One-Year Passport to Success What is On-boarding? Orientation On-boarding  Transactional focus and goals  Less than one week  Executed by HR Office  Address new employee needs  Completed paperwork  Strategic focus and goals  Starts before first day through first year  Supervisor & Senior Leadership involvement  Integrate multiple offices, functions and individuals  Address employee needs  Maximizes employee engagement and retention 2 On-boarding Program Goals 3  Build and sustain high-performance culture by accelerating time for new employee to become productive  Create learning opportunities that allow new employees to successfully integrate into their new DOE organization  Provide employees with the tools and resources to

227

DOE 11  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE A ward N o.: D E--NT0005665 Final T echnical R eport (October 2 008 - S eptember 2 012) Source c haracterization a nd t emporal variation o f m ethane s eepage f rom thermokarst l akes o n t he A laska N orth S lope in r esponse t o A rctic c limate c hange Submitted b y: University o f A laska Fairbanks, A K 9 9775 Prepared for: United S tates D epartment o f E nergy National E nergy T echnology L aboratory May 29 th 2013 Office of Fossil Energy 2 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any

228

DOE Pulse  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

go! go! home about archives subscribe Profile Dr. Isaac Gamwo (left) works with Dr. Ward Burgess (right) at the National Energy Technology Laboratory. Photo Credit: NETL. The practical application of an elite researcher's life: Isaac K. Gamwo For a man whose expertise includes reactive multiphase fluid dynamics, complex fluid properties, and chemical looping combustion processes, Dr. Isaac Gamwo is surprisingly easy to comprehend. "The research we do in this lab is not confined to the world of academia," he notes, "it has tangible impacts on the way we produce energy." As senior research chemical engineer at DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Dr. Gamwo is currently focused on complex fluid properties at high temperatures and pressures. His recent work includes

229

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Calendar of Wind Power-Related Events  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Events Events Printable Version Bookmark and Share Past Events Calendar of Wind Power-Related Events This page provides and extensive list of wind power-related events. Web developers are welcome to download an Excel file containing a list of these events to expedite inclusion on their websites (last updated 12/5/13). The Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative also makes its calendar available through an RSS Feed Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative events RSS feed . Learn about RSS Feeds. View Events by State Go to the text version of states with events. View Events by Month To view a list of events by month, select a month from the drop down box below. Make a selection All Events December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014

230

DOE-1 BDL SUMMARY. DOE-1 GROUP.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

may be this command. DOE~! Reference Manual. placed in BDL-3W-7405-EN ons c BDl, SUMMARY DOE~ I l.awrence , Californiaused in conjunction with other DOE~l documentation. Table of

Authors, Various

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

231

Active DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Active DOE Technical Standards Active DOE Technical Standards Document Number Document Title Responsible SLM DOE-HDBK-1001-96 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 DOE-HDBK-1003-96 DOE-HDBK-1010-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/4-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1015/1-93

232

Cooperative Extension Service & Wind Powering America Collaborate to Provide Wind Energy Information to Rural Stakeholders (Poster)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Cooperative Extension's presence blankets much of the United States and has been a trusted information source to rural Americans. By working together, Cooperative Extension, Wind Powering America, and the wind industry can better educate the public and rural stakeholders about wind energy and maximize the benefits of wind energy to local communities. This poster provides an overview of Cooperative Extension, wind energy issues addressed by the organization, and related activities.

Jimenez, A.; Flower, L.; Hamlen, S.

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

Stakeholder identification of advanced technology opportunities at international ports of entry  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As part of the Advanced Technologies for International and Intermodal Ports of Entry (ATIPE) Project, a diverse group of stakeholders was engaged to help identify problems experienced at inland international border crossings, particularly those at the US-Mexican border. The fundamental issue at international ports of entry is reducing transit time through the required documentation and inspection processes. Examples of other issues or problems, typically manifested as time delays at border crossings, repeatedly mentioned by stakeholders include: (1) lack of document standardization; (2) failure to standardize inspection processes; (3) inadequate information and communications systems; (4) manual fee and tariff collection; (5) inconsistency of processes and procedures; and (6) suboptimal cooperation among governmental agencies. Most of these issues can be addressed to some extent by the development of advanced technologies with the objective of allowing ports of entry to become more efficient while being more effective. Three categories of technologies were unambiguously of high priority to port of entry stakeholders: (1) automated documentation; (2) systems integration; and (3) vehicle and cargo tracking. Together, these technologies represent many of the technical components necessary for pre-clearance of freight approaching international ports of entry. Integration of vehicle and cargo tracking systems with port of entry information and communications systems, as well as existing industry legacy systems, should further enable border crossings to be accomplished consistently with optimal processing times.

Parker, S.K. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States). Energy Policy and Planning Dept.; Icerman, L. [Icerman and Associates, Santa Fe, NM (United States)

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

Stakeholder behavior and legislative influence: A case study of recreational water rights in Colorado  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Colorado water law is based on 150 years of legal, constitutional, and administrative precedent. Much of this precedent encourages traditional consumptive uses of water and impedes non-consumptive uses. Throughout Colorados history, the water law system has evolved to include new codified uses of water. This paper analyzes the behavior of stakeholder groups that drove legislative changes in the Colorado General Assembly in the most recent example of this evolutionthe inclusion of non-consumptive recreational in-channel water rights as a codified use of water. Using a qualitative case study research method, this study finds that collaboration among formerly disenfranchised stakeholders explains their legislative success despite the lesser degree of influence these groups have over water rights in Colorado. 2008 Western Social Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Groups of policy actors influence the policy process significantly and can take the form of interrelated actors in policy communities (Kingdon, 2003), or coalitions of stakeholders within and outside government (Sabatier & Jenkins-Smith, 1993). These groups use internal coordinated action to promote their preferred versions of policy change. This paper analyzes the role that groups played in the process of policy change in the case of recreational water

Deserai Anderson Crow

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

DOE Information Center  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Information Center The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Center provides citizens a consolidated facility to obtain information and records related to the DOE's...

236

DOE Mentoring Program Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

our employees have fulfilling and productive careers within the Department. DOE Strategic Plan (May 2011) DOE Mentoring Program Page 2 June 2012 Table of Contents DOE...

237

DOE Hosts Workshop on Transition to Electric Vehicles | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Hosts Workshop on Transition to Electric Vehicles DOE Hosts Workshop on Transition to Electric Vehicles DOE Hosts Workshop on Transition to Electric Vehicles July 21, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis Washington, DC - On Thursday, July 22, 2010, the Department of Energy will host an electric vehicle workshop at DOE Headquarters in Washington, DC, bringing together more than 150 city officials, vehicle manufacturers, utility companies and other stakeholders. The workshop will help participants better coordinate their efforts to expand the availability and use of electric cars, trucks and buses by discussing the infrastructure investments needed to support the broad deployment of plug-in electric vehicles. Throughout the day, the workshop will focus the discussion on high-impact steps regions can pursue in the near-term to better prepare for

238

Active Labor Unions and Organizations Interfacing With DOE | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Outreach & Collaboration » Focus Groups » Active Services » Outreach & Collaboration » Focus Groups » Active Labor Unions and Organizations Interfacing With DOE Active Labor Unions and Organizations Interfacing With DOE This information book is intended to provide an overview of what HSS has learned through our interface with representative labor unions and stakeholders since the inception of the Focus Group, along with accomplishments and current efforts to address identified areas of weakness. Handbook of Active Labor Unions and Organizations Interfacing With DOE More Documents & Publications HSS/Union Leadership Meeting on DOE Safety and Security Reform HSS Work Group Telecom (Draft Charters) Deputy Secretary Roundtable Meeting with Unions Enforcement Guidance Oversight Reporting Security Classification

239

CEA memo to DOE re ex parte communication.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 7, 2012 November 7, 2012 Re: Docket No. EERE-2011-BT-NOA-0067 and RIN Number 1904-AC52 Ex parte communication Department of Energy Telephone conference of November 2, 2012 This memorandum for the record provides a summary of a November 2, 2012, telephone call with U.S. Department of Energy staff concerning negotiations on a potential voluntary agreement among stakeholders regarding set-top box energy efficiency. Meeting attendees: Daniel Cohen (DOE Office of General Counsel) John Cymbalsky (DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy) Jeremy Dommu (DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy) Paul Glist (National Cable & Telecommunications Association) Neal Goldberg (National Cable & Telecommunications Association) Kathleen Hogan (DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy)

240

Hydrogen Storage … DOE Program/Targets and Workshop Objectives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory August 14, 2002 JoAnn Milliken Neil Rossmeissl Hydrogen, Fuel Cells & Infrastructure Technologies Program Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Hydrogen Storage - DOE Program/Targets and Workshop Objectives Outline * The Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Program * Role of FreedomCAR * R&D Priorities * DOE Fuel Cell & Hydrogen Activities * DOE Targets/Status * Workshop Objectives Hydrogen and Fuel Cells are a High Priority within EERE Hydrogen Vision/Roadmap Workshops held Nov 2001 & April 2002 with industry stakeholders * Hydrogen Vision complete * Hydrogen Roadmap draft completed * www.eren.doe.gov/hydrogen/features.html Technology development for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles is the thrust of the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Stakeholder Representation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... would impact the workability of the Steering Group and Management Council. ... providers), but not too much effort on the demand side (relying parties ...

2012-03-20T23:59:59.000Z

242

Other Stakeholders  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio 45343 (937) 847-6636 E-mail: ellen.stanifer@cityofmiamisburg.com Mound Science and Energy Museum (MSEM) 1075 Mound Road Miamisburg, Ohio 45342-6714 Website: http:...

243

Summary of Needs and Opportunities from the 2011 Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholders Meeting: Atlanta, Georgia -- March 16-18, 2011  

SciTech Connect

This summary report outlines needs and issues for increasing energy efficiency of new and existing U.S homes, as identified at the U.S Department of Energy Building America program Spring 2011 stakeholder meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

244

Analytic Framework for Evaluation of State Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Policies with Reference to Stakeholder Drivers  

SciTech Connect

This report presents the framework that was developed to analyze energy efficiency and renewable energy policies on the state level based on how well they meet the stakeholder drivers.

Brown, E.; Mosey, G.

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

The role of science, stakeholder engagement, and decision making process design in advancing innovation around water management in Massachusetts  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Sustainable Water Management Initiative is a multi-stakeholder process that the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs convened in early 2010 to seek advice on how to more sustainably manage ...

Corson-Rikert, Tyler Andrew

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

246

DOE Science Showcase - Carbon Capture research in DOE Databases...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Sciences Division, DOE Office of Science DOE Key R&D Programs and Initiatives, DOE DOE Fossil Energy Techline, DOE What is carbon sequestration? NETL 2010 Carbon Sequestration...

247

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA In May 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a policy in...

248

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ashtabula  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ohio Ohio Ashtabula, Ohio, Site Other Regulatory Framework ashtabula2013 The Ashtabula, Ohio, Site is a 42.5-acre, privately owned site adjacent to the city of Ashtabula, about 55 miles east of Cleveland. From 1962 to 1988 Reactive Metals, Inc. (RMI) operated a facility on the property that manufactured metallic uranium tubes and rods and experimental quantities of thorium metal for use in the Hanford, Washington; and Savannah River, Georgia, weapons program reactors. RMI also extruded depleted uranium and nonradioactive materials, primarily copper-based, for the private sector. The site has been decontaminated and released for unrestricted use. Responsibility for maintaining records for the Ashtabula site was transferred to DOE's Office of Legacy Management in 2010. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For more information about the Ashtabula site, view the fact sheet.

249

THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES  

SciTech Connect

Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials. Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities. Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites in the complex. Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in DOE's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure strategy and contractor integration analysis. Interstate waste and materials shipments. Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from December 31, 1997 through April 30, 1998 under the NGA project. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; and provided ongoing support to state-DOE interactions in preparation for the March 30-31, 1998 NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force Meeting with DOE. maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, DOE's Environmental Management Budget, and DOE's proposed Intersite Discussions.

NONE

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

Social Acceptance of Wind Power in the United States: Evaluating Stakeholder Perspectives (Poster)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

As the wind industry strives to achieve 20% wind energy by 2030, maintaining high levels of social acceptance for wind energy will become increasingly important. Wind Powering America is currently researching stakeholder perspectives in the U.S. market and reviewing findings from wind energy projects around the world to better understand social acceptance barriers. Results from European studies show that acceptance varies widely depending on local community values. A preliminary survey shows similar results in the United States. Further research will be conducted to refine our understanding of key social acceptance barriers and evaluate the best ways to mitigate negative perspectives on wind power.

Tegen, S.; Lantz, E.

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

251

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Brunswick2_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

a certification of protectiveness to the State regulator and stakeholders. Office of Legacy Management activities also include managing site records and responding to stakeholder...

252

Overview of DOE-Supported Infrastructure Analyses Webinar  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Overview of DOE-Supported Overview of DOE-Supported Infrastructure Analyses Webinar U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Office July 24, 2013 2 | Fuel Cell Technologies Office eere.energy.gov * Introduction and webinar objectives * Analyses and Models * Examples * Component-level Models * Market Penetration * Transition Scenarios * Financial Models * Impact of Policies * Regional Models * Model enhancements * Next steps Agenda 3 | Fuel Cell Technologies Office eere.energy.gov H 2 USA is being formed as a public/private partnership among DOE and other Federal Agencies, automakers, hydrogen and industrial gas suppliers, state governments, academic institutions, and additional stakeholders to promote the widespread adoption of fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs).

253

DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award April 19, 2006 - 10:21am Addthis Vice President Cheney Presents DOE contractor with the nation's highest Presidential honor for performance excellence and quality achievement WASHINGTON, DC - Vice President Richard Cheney today presented DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company, operator of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), with the 2005 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The Baldrige award is the nation's highest Presidential honor for performance excellence and quality achievement and is presented annually to organizations that distinguish themselves through management excellence and continuous improvement to stakeholders.

254

DOE Releases Excess Uranium Inventory Plan | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Excess Uranium Inventory Plan Excess Uranium Inventory Plan DOE Releases Excess Uranium Inventory Plan December 16, 2008 - 8:51am Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - The United States Department of Energy (DOE) today issued its Excess Uranium Inventory Management Plan (the Plan), which outlines the Department's strategy for the management and disposition of its excess uranium inventories. The Plan highlights DOE's ongoing efforts to enhance national security and promote a healthy domestic nuclear infrastructure through the efficient and cost-effective management of its excess uranium inventories. The Department has a significant inventory of uranium that is excess to national defense needs and is expensive both to manage and secure. "The Plan provides the general public and interested stakeholders more

255

THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials. Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities. Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites in the complex. Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in DOE's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure strategy and contractor integration analysis. Interstate waste and materials shipments. Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from April 30, 1998 through June 30, 1998 under the NGA project. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; and provided ongoing support to state-DOE interactions. maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, DOE's Environmental Management Budget, and DOE's proposed Intersite Discussions.

NONE

1998-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

Stakeholder Database from the Center for Bioenergy Sustainability (Learn who the experts are)  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

The Center for BioEnergy Sustainability (CBES) is a leading resource for dealing with the environmental impacts and the ultimate sustainability of biomass production for conversion to biofuels and bio-based products. Its purpose is to use science and analysis to understand the sustainability (environmental, economic, and social) of current and potential future bioenergy production and distribution; to identify approaches to enhance bioenergy sustainability; and to serve as an independent source of the highest quality data and analysis for bioenergy stakeholders and decision makers. ... On the operational level, CBES is a focal point and business-development vehicle for ORNLs capabilities related to bioenergy sustainability and socioeconomic analyses. As such, it complements the BioEnergy Science Center (BESC), also located at ORNL, which focuses on the problem of converting lignocellulosic biomass into reactive intermediaries necessary for the cellulosic biofuel industry. Together, these centers provide a strong integrating mechanism and business-development tool for ORNL's science and technology portfolio in bioenergy [taken and edited from http://web.ornl.gov/sci/ees/cbes/. The Stakeholder Database allows you to find experts in bioenergy by their particular type of expertise, their affiliations or locations, their specific research areas or research approaches, etc.

257

Systems analysis of emerging IPTV entertainment platform : stakeholders, threats and opportunities  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Why do certain types of companies, goods, services survive and others do not. Why does one set continuously reinvent themselves and others wither away and die? Why does Cisco continue to provide exciting and innovative ...

Sharma, Shantnu

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

Transform, Protect and Advance - DOE's IT Modernization Strategy |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transform, Protect and Advance - DOE's IT Modernization Transform, Protect and Advance - DOE's IT Modernization Strategy Transform, Protect and Advance - DOE's IT Modernization Strategy September 5, 2012 - 12:57pm Addthis The Obama Administration's Digital Government Strategy provides a vision for a 21st century government that lays a strong foundation for modernizing technology services across the Federal Government. At Energy, we're implementing a three-pillar approach -- Transform, Protect and Advance - as part of this broader strategy, driving more secure, cost-effective, and efficient IT infrastructure and services. Transforming IT architecture to drive cost savings and streamlined operations The Department is leveraging new tools and services that will further reduce costs and streamline operations - making our IT infrastructure

259

Transform, Protect and Advance - DOE's IT Modernization Strategy |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transform, Protect and Advance - DOE's IT Modernization Transform, Protect and Advance - DOE's IT Modernization Strategy Transform, Protect and Advance - DOE's IT Modernization Strategy September 5, 2012 - 12:57pm Addthis The Obama Administration's Digital Government Strategy provides a vision for a 21st century government that lays a strong foundation for modernizing technology services across the Federal Government. At Energy, we're implementing a three-pillar approach -- Transform, Protect and Advance - as part of this broader strategy, driving more secure, cost-effective, and efficient IT infrastructure and services. Transforming IT architecture to drive cost savings and streamlined operations The Department is leveraging new tools and services that will further reduce costs and streamline operations - making our IT infrastructure

260

DOE-1 USERS GUIDE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

systems, etc. b. c. Run DOE-Ion each building design.ECONOMICS (It is assumed that DOE-l has already been run onthe baseline costs). vi. Run DOE-l vii. ECONOMICS report E03

Authors, Various

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

10 C.F.R. 708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program 708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program 10 C.F.R. 708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program Stakeholders: Employee(s) of DOE contractor(s) Scope: 10 C.F.R. 708 establishes criteria and procedures for the investigation, hearing, and review of allegations from DOE contractor employees of employer reprisal resulting from employee disclosure of information to DOE, to members of Congress, or to the contractor; employee participation in proceedings before Congress or pursuant to this subpart; or employee refusal to engage in illegal or dangerous activities, when such disclosure, participation, or refusal pertains to employer practices which the employee believes to be unsafe; to violate laws, rules, or regulations; or to involve fraud, mismanagement, waste, or abuse.

262

DOE Manual 442.1-1 Differing Professional Opinions Manual for Technical  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Manual 442.1-1 Differing Professional Opinions Manual for Manual 442.1-1 Differing Professional Opinions Manual for Technical Issues Involving Environment, Safety, and Health DOE Manual 442.1-1 Differing Professional Opinions Manual for Technical Issues Involving Environment, Safety, and Health Stakeholders: DOE Employees, contractors, and subcontractors Scope: DOE Manual 442.1-1 seeks to establish a Differing Professional Opinion (DPO) process. This process is to encourage DOE employees to discuss and resolve DPO's regarding environment, safety, and health (ES&H) issues in DOE facilities. The process outlined in this manual is intended to supplement DOE O 442.1A. Summary: For ES&H nuclear safety issues the Central Technical Authorities are responsible. For non nuclear ES&H issue The Under Secretaries or Deputy

263

Researching DOE Records  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy (DOE) welcomes researchers interested in documenting the Department's history. Significant portions of DOE's records, including declassified materials on the nuclear...

264

To: Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

'J| 'J| MaryBeth Zinmerman 0212212001 10:37 AM ',U To: Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE cc: Nancy Jeffery/EE/DOE@DOE Subject: Old Chpt 2, new Chap 3 Can you work on answering the editor's questions on this? Forwarded by MaryBeth Zimmenman/EE/DOE on 22/2001 10:36 AM "'"- . . Michael York 02/21/2001 01:13 PM To: commcoll@aol.com cc: MaryBeth Zimmerman/EE/DOE@DOE Subject: Chapter 2 Joan, attached is the first chapter to edit. We will be sending you the next chapter as soon as it is available. If you have any questions, please call me at (202) 586-5669. Thanks! Michael York Chapter 2_Energy Impacts_2.16.01.d 22894 DOE024-0300 JOEL RUBIN 02/22/2001 03:00 PM To: Marybeth Zimmerman cc: Nancy Jeffery, Darrell Beschen/EE/DOE@DOE, Michael York Subject Chapter 2 Updates MBZ - This draft incorporates (in blue ink) updates based upon the comments from Joan. Ive deleted Joan's

265

Heat island mitigation benefits from the collaboration between researchers and stakeholders, interdisciplinary methods, and neighborhood-scale strategies that account for  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

York (NYC), the heat island impacts interact with aging energy and water infrastructure, key stakeholders included Con Edison, the local utility responsible for the majority of electricity

266

The community environmental monitoring program: a model for stakeholder involvement in environmental monitoring  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Since 1981, the Community Environmental Monitoring Program (CEMP) has involved stakeholders directly in its daily operation and data collection, as well as in dissemination of information on radiological surveillance in communities surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS), the primary location where the United States (US) conducted nuclear testing until 1992. The CEMP is funded by the US Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, and is administered by the Desert Research Institute (DRI) of the Nevada System of Higher Education. The CEMP provides training workshops for stakeholders involved in the program, and educational outreach to address public concerns about health risk and environmental impacts from past and ongoing NTS activities. The network includes 29 monitoring stations located across an approximately 160,000 km{sup 2} area of Nevada, Utah and California in the southwestern US. The principal radiological instruments are pressurized ion chambers for measuring gamma radiation, and particulate air samplers, primarily for alpha/beta detection. Stations also employ a full suite of meteorological instruments, allowing for improved interpretation of the effects of meteorological events on background radiation levels. Station sensors are wired to state-of-the-art data-loggers that are capable of several weeks of on-site data storage, and that work in tandem with a communications system that integrates DSL and wireless internet, land line and cellular phone, and satellite technologies for data transfer. Data are managed through a platform maintained by the Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC) that DRI operates for the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The WRCC platform allows for near real-time upload and display of current monitoring information in tabular and graphical formats on a public web site. Archival data for each station are also available on-line, providing the ability to perform trending analyses or calculate site-specific exposure rates. This configuration also allows for remote programming and troubleshooting of sensors. Involvement of stakeholders in the monitoring process provides a number of benefits, including increased public confidence in monitoring results, as well as decreasing costs by more than 50 percent from when the program was managed entirely by U.S. federal employees. Additionally, the CEMP provides an ideal platform for testing new environmental sensors. (authors)

Hartwell, William T. [Division of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, Nevada (United States); Shafer, David S. [Division of Hydrological Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, Nevada (United States)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

ABSTRACT: The Community Environmental Monitoring Program: Reducing Public Perception of Risk Through Stakeholder Involvement  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Between 1951 and 1992, 928 nuclear tests were conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS), including 100 atmospheric and 828 underground tests. Initial public reaction to the tests was largely supportive, but by the late 1950s this began to change, largely as a result of fear of the potential for adverse health effects to be caused by exposure to ionizing radiation resulting from the tests. The nuclear power plant accident at Three Mile Island in 1979 served to heighten these fears, as well as foster a general distrust of the federal agencies involved and low public confidence in monitoring results. Modeled after a similar program that involved the public in monitoring activities around the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant, the Community Environmental Monitoring Program (CEMP) has promoted stakeholder involvement, awareness, and understanding of radiological surveillance in communities surrounding the NTS since 1981. It involves stakeholders in the operation, data collection, and dissemination of information obtained from a network of 29 stations across a wide area of Nevada, Utah, and California. It is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) and administered by the Desert Research Institute (DRI) of the Nevada System of Higher Education. Since assuming administration of the program in 2000, DRI has accomplished significant enhancements to the network's data collection and transmission capabilities. A robust datalogging and communications system allows for the near real-time transmission of data to a platform maintained by DRI's Western Regional Climate Center, where the data are uploaded and displayed on a publicly accessible web site (http://cemp.dri.edu/). Additionally, the CEMP can serve as part of an emergency response network in the event of an unplanned radiological release from the NTS, and also provides an excellent platform for testing new environmental sensor technologies. Finally, the CEMP provides training workshops for involved stakeholders, and educational programs, which help to alleviate public perception of risk of health effects from past activities conducted at the NTS.

T. Hartwell

2007-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

268

Mobilizing Public Markets to Finance Renewable Energy Projects: Insights from Expert Stakeholders  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mobilizing Public Markets to Mobilizing Public Markets to Finance Renewable Energy Projects: Insights from Expert Stakeholders Paul Schwabe and Michael Mendelsohn National Renewable Energy Laboratory Felix Mormann Steyer-Taylor Center for Energy Policy and Finance Stanford University Douglas J. Arent Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-55021 June 2012 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Mobilizing Public Markets to Finance Renewable Energy Projects: Insights from Expert

269

Microsoft PowerPoint - WH Energy and Climate Stakeholders 10-7-09 final.ppt  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laying the Foundation for a Laying the Foundation for a Generation of Clean Energy Jobs Energy and Climate Stakeholders Briefing October 7, 2009 The message We need a new industrial revolution to ensure American competitiveness, decrease our dependency on foreign oil, and mitigate climate change. The United States has the opportunity to be the innovation leader. 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 5 25 20 15 10 0 Production Consumption Million barrels per day We are dependent on foreign oil US became a net oil importer in the 1940s 4 June 2009 summary of climate change impacts on the United States. Sources include the IPCC and CCSP (Climate Change Science Program) 5 Days above 90º F Chicago: ~ 10 days to 75 -90 days greater than 90°F St. Louis: ~ 45 days to ~ 120 days (1/3 of the year) We are also behind in other energy

270

EVALUATING INTERNAL STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVES ON RISK-INFORMED REGULATORY PRACTICES FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has begun a program to create a risk-informed environment within the reactor program. The first step of the process is to evaluate the existing environment and internal NRC stakeholder perceptions of risk-informed regulatory practices. This paper reports on the results of the first phase of this evaluation: assessing the current environment, including the level of acceptance of risk-informed approaches throughout the reactor program, the level of integration, areas of success, and areas of difficulty. The other two phases of the evaluation will identify barriers to the integration of risk into NRC activities and gather input on how to move to a risk-informed environment.

Peterson, L.K.; Wight, E.H.; Caruso, M.A.

2003-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

271

Stakeholder perspectives on the Clean Air Interstate and the Clean Air Mercury Rules  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In a follow-up to last month's detailed overviews of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) and the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR), this month EM presents perspectives on the two rules from representatives of a range of stakeholders, including EPA, the states, the regulated community, and the environmental community. Titles of the perspectives are: A Multipollutant Approach to Emissions Reductions; Clean Air Lessons from the Myth of Sisyphus; Reactions to EPA's Clean Air Interstate and Clean Air Mercury Rules; The Case for Coal Rank Subcategorization to Regulate Mercury Emissions; EPA's Mercury Rule: The Latest Delay Tactic; EPA's Mercury Rule: With Technology Today, We Can Do Better; STAPPA/ALAPCO's Perspectives on CAMR and CAIR. 16 refs.

C.V. Mathai; Jeffrey Holmstead; Michael Shore; Skiles Boyd; Vicky Sullivan; Dan Weiss; John Kinsman; Steve Lomax; Michael Rossler; David Steele; Greg Schaefer; Felice Stadler; David Foerter; William Becker [Arizona Public Services, Phoenix, AZ (US)

2005-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES  

SciTech Connect

Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials; Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities; Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites in the complex; Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis; Interstate waste and materials shipments; and Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from May 1, 1999, through July 30, 1999, under the NGA grant. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, external regulation of DOE; and continued to facilitate interactions between the states and DOE to develop a foundation for an ongoing substantive relationship between the Governors of key states and Secretary Richardson.

Ann M. Beauchesne

1999-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

273

THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES  

SciTech Connect

Through the National Governors Association (NGA) project ``Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials; Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities; Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites in the complex; Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis; Interstate waste and materials shipments; and Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the period from October 1, 1999 through January 31, 2000, under the NGA grant. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past three months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; convened and facilitated the October 6--8 NGA FFCA Task Force Meeting in Oak Ridge, Tennessee; maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, external regulation of DOE; and continued to facilitate interactions between the states and DOE to develop a foundation for an ongoing substantive relationship between the Governors of key states and the Department.

Ann M. Beauchesne

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205851.800.dial.DOE en DOE-STD-1150-2013 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-1150-2013 doe-std-1150-2013" class="title-link">DOE-STD-1150-2013

275

DOE Launches New Smart Grid Web Portal | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Web Portal Smart Grid Web Portal DOE Launches New Smart Grid Web Portal January 13, 2011 - 5:54pm Addthis Today, the DOE General Counsel's Office is launching a new Smart Gird web portal. In October, the General Counsel's office released two reports exploring technological and legal issues critical for the continued development of the Smart Grid. Drawing upon significant public participation, the reports recommended several next steps to assist utilities and other stakeholders in the rollout of Smart Grid technologies and applications. One of these recommendations was to provide a public portal for information on a variety of issues, including data access and privacy, priority of service, wireless spectrum, and network reliability. The newly-designed and enhanced Smart Grid Information web page can be

276

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- SiteA  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Illinois Illinois Site A/Plot M, Illinois, Decommissioned Reactor Site A D&D Program Site sitea_map As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Site A/Plot M Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Site A/Plot M site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Inspection/Sampling Schedule Site A/Plot M Decommissioned Reactor Mapping and Monitoring (GEMS)

277

DOE Regional Partnership Successfully Demonstrates Terrestrial CO2 Storage  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Successfully Demonstrates Terrestrial CO2 Successfully Demonstrates Terrestrial CO2 Storage Practices in Great Plains Region of U.S. and Canada DOE Regional Partnership Successfully Demonstrates Terrestrial CO2 Storage Practices in Great Plains Region of U.S. and Canada August 19, 2010 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - A field test demonstrating the best approaches for terrestrial carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in the heartland of North America has been successfully completed by one of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) seven Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships (RCSPs). The Plains CO2 Reduction (PCOR) Partnership , a collaboration of over 80 U.S. and Canadian stakeholders, conducted the field test at sites in the Prairie Pothole Region, extending from central Iowa into Northern Alberta,

278

DOE Hosts Workshop on Transition to Electric Vehicles | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Workshop on Transition to Electric Vehicles Workshop on Transition to Electric Vehicles DOE Hosts Workshop on Transition to Electric Vehicles July 21, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis Washington, DC - On Thursday, July 22, 2010, the Department of Energy will host an electric vehicle workshop at DOE Headquarters in Washington, DC, bringing together more than 150 city officials, vehicle manufacturers, utility companies and other stakeholders. The workshop will help participants better coordinate their efforts to expand the availability and use of electric cars, trucks and buses by discussing the infrastructure investments needed to support the broad deployment of plug-in electric vehicles. Throughout the day, the workshop will focus the discussion on high-impact steps regions can pursue in the near-term to better prepare for

279

14th Annual Joint DOE/EFCOG Chemical Safety and Worker Safety and Health  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4th Annual Joint DOE/EFCOG Chemical Safety and Worker Safety and 4th Annual Joint DOE/EFCOG Chemical Safety and Worker Safety and Health Program (10 CFR 851) Workshop 14th Annual Joint DOE/EFCOG Chemical Safety and Worker Safety and Health Program (10 CFR 851) Workshop Workshop Dates: March 13-15, 2012 The workshop served to promote continuous improvement in the implementation of 851 through the shared experiences and enhancements of a variety of DOE stakeholder communities. Panel members from Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, the United Steel Workers, the DOE Offices of Environmental Management and the National Nuclear Security Administration, and the HSS Offices of Worker Safety and Health Policy and Enforcement and Oversight, provided 851 implementation perspectives and an opportunity for interactive discussion and exchange with attendees.

280

State and Local Government Partnership - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Joel M. Rinebold Connecticut Center for Advanced Technology (CCAT), Inc. 222 Pitkin Street, Suite 101 East Hartford, CT 06108 Phone: (860) 291-8832 Email: Jrinebold@ccat.us DOE Managers HQ: Connie Bezanson Phone: (202) 586-8055 Email: Connie.Bezanson@ee.doe.gov GO: Gregory Kleen Phone: (720) 356-1672 Email: Gregory.Kleen@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FC36-08GO18116 / 003 Project Start Date: September 1, 2008 Project End Date: December 31, 2011 Project Objectives Foster strong relationships among federal, state, and * local government officials, industry, and appropriate stakeholders. Serve as a conduit between the DOE and state and local *

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials. Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities. Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites in the complex. Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis. Interstate waste and materials shipments. Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the period from April 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001, under the NGA grant.

Ethan W. Brown

2001-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials; Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities; Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites in the complex; Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis; Interstate waste and materials shipments; and Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from February 1, 1999, through April 30, 1999, under the NGA grant. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, external regulation of DOE; and EM Integration activities; and continued to serve as a liaison between the NGA FFCA Task Force states and the Department.

Ann M. Beauchesne

1999-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

283

THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: (1) Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials; (2) Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities; (3) Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites in the complex; (4) Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis; (5) Interstate waste and materials shipments; and (6) Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from October 1, 1998 through January 31, 1999, under the NGA grant. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: (1) maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; (2) maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, external regulation of DOE; and EM Integration activities; and (3) continued to serve as a liaison between the NGA FFCA Task Force states and the Department.

Ann M. Beauchesne

1999-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

284

THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES  

SciTech Connect

Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: (1) Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials; (2) Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities; (3) Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites in the complex; (4) Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis; (5) Interstate waste and materials shipments; and (6) Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from June 1, 1998 through September 30, 1998, under the NGA grant. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: (1) maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; (2) maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, external regulation of DOE; and EM Integration activities; and (3) continued to serve as a liaison between the NGA FFCA Task Force states and the Department.

Ann B. Beauchesne

1998-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

285

EM Reports Success in Drive to Meet DOE Fleet Reduction Goals | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Success in Drive to Meet DOE Fleet Reduction Goals Reports Success in Drive to Meet DOE Fleet Reduction Goals EM Reports Success in Drive to Meet DOE Fleet Reduction Goals July 18, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Secretary Chu, right, discusses electric vehicles with Brian Wynne, president of the Electric Drive Transportation Association, at an event in 2011. Secretary Chu, right, discusses electric vehicles with Brian Wynne, president of the Electric Drive Transportation Association, at an event in 2011. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM is on pace to meet the first of a series of goals to reduce its vehicle fleet and help DOE accomplish a broader initiative to cut greenhouse gas emissions and decrease petroleum consumption across the complex. In January 2011, Secretary Chu challenged DOE to reduce its vehicle fleet by 35 percent over three years, and EM committed to a 15 percent drop in

286

EM Reports Success in Drive to Meet DOE Fleet Reduction Goals | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM Reports Success in Drive to Meet DOE Fleet Reduction Goals EM Reports Success in Drive to Meet DOE Fleet Reduction Goals EM Reports Success in Drive to Meet DOE Fleet Reduction Goals July 18, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Secretary Chu, right, discusses electric vehicles with Brian Wynne, president of the Electric Drive Transportation Association, at an event in 2011. Secretary Chu, right, discusses electric vehicles with Brian Wynne, president of the Electric Drive Transportation Association, at an event in 2011. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM is on pace to meet the first of a series of goals to reduce its vehicle fleet and help DOE accomplish a broader initiative to cut greenhouse gas emissions and decrease petroleum consumption across the complex. In January 2011, Secretary Chu challenged DOE to reduce its vehicle fleet by 35 percent over three years, and EM committed to a 15 percent drop in

287

DOE Mentoring Program Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

If you are interested in continuous learning and self-development, the DOE Mentoring Program is for you. This guide will provide you with general information regarding mentoring at DOE. Learning...

288

DOE MENTOR-PROTG  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

goal , 52% small business subcontracting goal, and statutory socio-economic goals 2 HISTORY OF DOE MENTOR-PROTG PROGRAM June 9, 1995 The DOE Mentor Protg Program Initiative...

289

DOE MENTOR-PROTG  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

goal, 52% small business subcontracting goal, and statutory socio-economic goal 2 HISTORY OF DOE MENTOR-PROTG PROGRAM June 9, 1995 The DOE Mentor Protg Program Initiative...

290

DOE Federal Quality Council  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Federal Quality Council Note: Membership can be updated without re-approval of the Charter Name Org. Location Email Phone Colette Broussard HSS GTN colette.broussard@hq.doe.gov...

291

DOE Data Explorer  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DDE Discovering data and non-text information in the Department of Energy DOE Data Explorer What's New About DDE DOE Data Centers OSTI's Data ID Service Featured Collection...

292

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Geothermal  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Office, California. After remediation, the site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2005. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For...

293

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maxey  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

and Liability Act (CERCLA) regulations. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2004 and requires records-related activities and stakeholder support....

294

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- MURR  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Office, California. After remediation, the site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2005. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For...

295

DOE Releases Electricity Subsector Cybersecurity Risk Management...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

that help them manage their cybersecurity risks more effectively." Feedback provided by industry, vendors, and other electricity subsector stakeholders during two comment periods...

296

Completed DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Completed) Completed) Project Number Title Document ID SLM / ORG Author / Phone / Email Status / Review Date P1020-2002REV National Phenomena hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for DOE Facilities DOE-STD-1020-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30) P1066-1999REV Fire Protection and Emergency Services Program and Design Criteria (revision to DOE-STD-1066-99) DOE-STD-1066-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30)

297

DOE/NNSA  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... 1 Kansas City Plant DOE/NNSA Product Tolerance Representation ... Way Forward: Progress Shared Agendas Mandates NNSA (KCP) ...

2012-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

298

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Offshore 90-Meter Wind Maps and Wind  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Offshore 90-Meter Wind Maps and Wind Resource Potential Offshore 90-Meter Wind Maps and Wind Resource Potential The Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative provides 90-meter (m) height, high-resolution wind maps and estimates of the total offshore wind potential that would be possible from developing the available offshore areas. The offshore wind resource maps can be used as a guide to identify regions for commercial wind development. A map of the United States showing offshore wind resource. Washington offshore wind map. Oregon offshore wind map. California offshore wind map. Texas offshore wind map. Minnesota offshore wind map. Lousiana offshore wind map. Wisconsin offshore wind map. Michigan offshore wind map. Michigan offshore wind map. Illinois offshore wind map. Indiana offshore wind map. Ohio offshore wind map. Georgia offshore wind map. South Carolina offshore wind map. North Carolina offshore wind map. Virginia offshore wind map. Maryland offshore wind map. Pennsylvania offshore wind map. Delaware offshore wind map. New Jersey offshore wind map. New York offshore wind map. Maine offshore wind map. Massachusetts offshore wind map. Rhode Island offshore wind map. Connecticut offshore wind map. Hawaii offshore wind map. Delaware offshore wind map. New Hampshire offshore wind map.

299

The Resource Handbook on DOE Transportation Risk Assessment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In an attempt to bring forth increased efficiency and effectiveness in assessing transportation risks associated with radioactive materials or wastes, the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) National Transportation Program (NTP) published a resource handbook in 2002. The handbook draws from the broad technical expertise among DOE national laboratories and industry, which reflects the extensive experience gained from DOE's efforts in conducting assessments (i.e., environmental impact assessments) within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in the past 20 years. The handbook is intended to serve as a primary source of information regarding the approach and basis for conducting transportation risk assessments under normal or accidental conditions that are associated with shipping radioactive materials or wastes. It is useful as a reference to DOE managers, NEPA assessors, technical analysts, contractors, and also stakeholders. It provides a summary of pertinent U.S. policies and regulations on the shipment of radioactive materials, existing guidance on preparing transportation risk assessments, a review of previous transportation risk assessments by DOE and others, a description of comprehensive and generally accepted transportation risk assessment methodologies, and a compilation of supporting data, parameters, and assumptions. The handbook also provides a discussion paper on an issue that has been identified as being important in the past. The discussion paper focuses on cumulative impacts, illustrating the ongoing evolution of transportation risk assessment. The discussion may be expanded in the future as emerging issues are identified. The handbook will be maintained and periodically updated to provide current and accurate information.

Chen, S. Y.; Kapoor, A. K.

2003-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

300

Guidelines for risk-based prioritization of DOE activities  

SciTech Connect

This standard describes issues that should be considered when comparing, selecting, or implementing risk-based prioritization (RBP) systems. It also discusses characteristics that should be used in evaluating the quality of an RBP system and its associated results. The purpose of this standard is to provide guidance for selecting or developing an RBP system so that when implemented, it will: (a) improve the quality of the RBP systems employed by DOE and its contractors; (b) improve the consistency and comparability of RBP system results; (c) satisfy DOE requests to perform RBP; (d) help ensure that limited resources are used efficiently and effectively; (e) help ensure that characteristics for evaluating RBP systems are met and properly balanced; (f) promote greater understanding, use, and acceptance of RBP systems; (g) promote greater understanding between DOE and its stakeholders and regulators; (h) improve the quality of resource allocation, planning, and scheduling decisions. This standard is applicable to any and all uses of RBP by DOE elements, including cases in which RBP is requested by DOE or is used to help allocate resources among alternatives that compete for resources. Prioritizing alternatives that compete for limited resources encompasses many policy issues that are inherent to an RBP effort. It is the position of this standard that policy issues should be determined by the decision maker(s) requesting the prioritization. For additional information on policy issues, refer to section 10 on Application Guidance for Policy Issues.

NONE

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

DOE ISM CHAMPIONS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9/27/12 9/27/12 DOE ISM CHAMPIONS Organization Points of Contact Phone E-mail DOE ISM Co- Champion (HSS) Pat Worthington (301) 903-5926 pat.worthington@hq.doe.gov DOE ISM Co- Champion (EM) Ray Corey (509) 376-0108 ray_j_corey@rl.gov Ames Cindy Baebler (630) 252-1563 cynthia.baebler@ch.doe.gov Argonne Joanna M. Livengood (630) 252-2366 joanna.livengood@ch.doe.gov Brookhaven Bob Desmarais (631) 344-5434 rdesmarais@bnl.gov CBFO Josef A. Sobieraj (575) 234-7499 Josef.sobieraj@wipp.ws CDNS Don F. Nichols (202) 586-8216 don.nichols@nnsa.doe.gov Chicago Justin Zamirowski (630) 252-2248 justin.zamirowski@ch.doe.gov CNS-Energy Chip Lagdon (301) 903-4218 (202) 586-0799 chip.lagdon@hq.doe.gov EE Gary Staffo (202) 586-9577 gary.staffo@ee.doe.gov EM James A. Hutton (202) 586-0975 james.hutton@em.doe.gov

302

DOE Information Center  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Information Center DOE Information Center The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Center provides citizens a consolidated facility to obtain information and records related to the DOE's various programs in Oak Ridge and abroad. Employees at the DOE Information Center are available to assist with your requests and searches from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EST), Monday through Friday, except for federal holidays. Requests Documents can be requested in person or by telephone, email, or fax. Reproduction Please allow DOE Information Center staff adequate time to reproduce documents. Some material requires special handling, security reviews, etc. Delivery Unless special arrangements have been made with DOE Information Center staff, documents should be picked up during normal business hours.

303

DOE Patents Database - FAQ's  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Why was this database developed and by whom? How is this collection different than the one at the United States Patent and Trademark Office? What are the criteria for including patent records in this collection? How do you determine these patents were sponsored by DOE? How many patents are in this collection? Does the collection include all of DOE's patents? Does this collection include the full text for each patent? What time frame is covered by DOepatents? How often is this collection and Web site updated? Does the U.S. Government have exclusive rights to these inventions? What is OSTI? Where can I find information about doing business with DOE? How can I find additional information on the patenting process? Where can I find patents that are not related to DOE?

304

DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements March 16, 2010 - 4:28pm...

305

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18, 2013...

306

Search Results from DOE Databases  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Climate Modeling Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D...

307

Major DOE Biofuels Project Locations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(St. Joseph, MO) Abengoa Biochemica Agricultural Residue (Hugoton, KS) DOE Joint Bioenergy Institute (Berkeley, CA) DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (Madison, WI) DOE...

308

DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program - Library  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Library DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program DOELAP Regulatory Basis 10 CFR 835.402, Individual Monitoring, as amended DOELAP Program Administration DOE-STD 1111-98, DOE Laboratory...

309

DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II: Response to Public Comments (January 2 DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II: Response to Public Comments (January 2 DOE issued the Draft SEIS for public review and comment by mailings to stakeholders and by announcements in the Federal Register (FR) on November 5, 1999, (64 FR 60430) (Attachment 4 of Volume I) and on November 12, 1999 (64 FR 61635) correcting a document title (Attachment 5 of Volume I). On

310

News Release: DOE Hosting Public Meeting to Discuss the Riverton UMTRCA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Hosting Public Meeting to Discuss the Riverton DOE Hosting Public Meeting to Discuss the Riverton UMTRCA Site News Release: DOE Hosting Public Meeting to Discuss the Riverton UMTRCA Site April 9, 2012 - 2:37pm Addthis News Contact: News Contact: Judy Miller, S.M. Stoller Corporation Public Affairs (970) 248-6363 jmiller@lm.doe.gov The U.S. Department of Energy will host an informational public meeting for Riverton, Wyoming, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Site stakeholders from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., on Wednesday, May 2, 2012, at the Central Wyoming College Arts Theater, 2660 Peck Avenue, Riverton, Wyoming. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss recent events and ongoing work at the Riverton site. The discussion will include an update on the current state of the groundwater remediation strategy, the alternative water supply

311

Stakeholder Input to Planning ProcessSTATE OF CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

annual budget plans for natural gas research, development and demonstration (RD&D) activities. Currently, the Energy Commission is developing the budget plan for fiscal year 2013-14 and estimates that a total of $24 million will be available for natural gas RD&D. As part of this process, we seek ideas for natural gas research initiatives in the following areas: energy efficiency, renewable energy, natural gas infrastructure, natural gas related environmental research, and natural gas related transportation research. If you have research ideas, please complete the attached initiative template. This template asks you to discuss the issues/barriers your research will overcome, as well as provide a description of the initiative, stakeholders, background and justification. The information contained in your template should be no more than two pages. Complete one template per initiative. In 2004, California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) designated the Energy Commission as the administrator for the natural gas research program. In the last several years, the CPUC allocated an annual funding level of $24 million and defined public interest natural gas research as those that are directed towards developing science or technology, and 1) the benefits of which accrue to California citizens and 2) are not adequately addressed by competitive or regulated entities. The decision also directs that natural gas RD&D projects meet the following criteria: Focus on energy efficiency, renewable technologies, conservation, and environmental issues. Support state energy policy. Offer a reasonable probability of providing benefits to the general public. Consider opportunities for collaboration and co funding opportunities with other entities. Please email your suggested initiatives by December 14, 2012, to Jessie Rosales at

Edmund G. Brown

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

312

DOE Science Showcase - Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases Search Results from DOE Databases View research documents, citations, accomplishments, patents, and projects related to climate change, one of the primary scientific challenges addressed through the Incite Program. Climate Change Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Climate Modeling Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Ocean Turbulence and Climate Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Cloud Simulation and Models Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Global Warming Information Bridge Energy Citations Database

313

DOE G 414  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INITIATED BY: INITIATED BY: http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

314

DOE G 414  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

315

DOE handbook electrical safety  

SciTech Connect

Electrical Safety Handbook presents the Department of Energy (DOE) safety standards for DOE field offices or facilities involved in the use of electrical energy. It has been prepared to provide a uniform set of electrical safety guidance and information for DOE installations to effect a reduction or elimination of risks associated with the use of electrical energy. The objectives of this handbook are to enhance electrical safety awareness and mitigate electrical hazards to employees, the public, and the environment.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

Fiscal year 1996 annual report to stakeholders, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This is the Fiscal Year (FY) 1996 annual report on the status of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project. In 1978, Congress directed the DOE to assess and clean up contamination at 24 designated former uranium processing sites. The DOE is also responsible for cleaning up properties in the vicinity of the sites where wind and water erosion deposited tailings or people removed them from the site for use in construction of landscaping. Cleanup is being undertaken in cooperation with state governments and Indian tribes within whose boundaries the sites are located. It is being conducted in two phases: the surface project and the ground water project. This report addresses specifics about the surface phase of the UMTRA Project.

NONE

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

317

Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project fiscal year 1997 annual report to stakeholders  

SciTech Connect

The fiscal year (FY) 1997 annual report is the 19th report on the status of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project. In 1978, Congress directed the DOE to assess and clean up contamination at 24 designated former uranium processing sites. The DOE is also responsible for cleaning up properties in the vicinity of the sites where wind and water erosion deposited tailings or people removed them from the site for use in construction or landscaping. Cleanup has been undertaken in cooperation with state governments and Indian tribes within whose boundaries the sites are located. It is being conducted in two phases: the surface project and the groundwater project. This report addresses specifics about the UMTRA surface project.

NONE

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

318

JGI - DOE Mission Relevance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

User Programs User Programs Project Management Office Community Science Program Emerging Technologies Opportunity Program Technology Development Pilot Program Genomic Encyc. of Bacteria and Archaea MyJGI: Information for Collaborators DOE Mission Relevance CSP | Overview | How to Propose a Project | Review Process | DOE Relevance Proposal Schedule | FAQ The Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (DOE JGI) is managed by the Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research (OBER) to produce high-throughput DNA sequencing and analysis in support of its missions in alternative energy, global carbon cycling, and biogeochemistry. These areas mirror DOE and national priorities to develop abundant sources of clean energy, to control greenhouse gas accumulation in

319

DOE Glass Publications Portal  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

coated glass products. The Glass IOF is sponsored by the Department of Energy (DOE) Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Industrial Technologies Program (ITP) which...

320

DOE Science Showcase - Nanotechnology  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

valuable way to spotlight needs and target resources in this critical area of science and technology. Nanotechnology Research Results in DOE Databases DOepatents ScienceCinema...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

DOE General Competencies  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The DOE General Competencies are the personal and professional attributes that are critical to successful performance. A competency model is a collection of competencies that together define...

322

DOE G 414  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initial Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes, Memorandum to Linton Brooks, Defense Programs and Jessie Hill Roberson, Office of Environmental Management, March 28, 2003. DOE-STD-3009-94,...

323

2012 DOE Sustainability Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2012 DOE Sustainability Awards PSO Site Title EE National Renewable Energy Laboratory Comprehensive Energy Management EM Headquarters - EM Environmental Management's Sustainability...

324

JGI - DOE Sequencing Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Sequencing Projects For status information, see the Genome Projects section Organism Est. Genome Size Branchiostoma floridae (Florida lancelet) 600 Mb Chlamydomonas reinhardtii...

325

DOE/ID-Number  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

hole assembly BOPE blow-out prevention equipment BRC Blue Ribbon Commission BWR boiling water reactor CSH calcium-silicate-hydrate DBD deep borehole disposal DOE Department of...

326

DOE Green Energy  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

A SCIENCE Accelerator Resource Search the DOE Green Energy knowledge base: Search Search Behind the scenes, your keyword query will be mapped to related scientific concepts. This...

327

DOE - Fossil Energy:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Trends Button National Security Button Safety and Health Button DOE Office of Fossil Energy Web Site Fossil Energy - Clean Coal Technologies - Carbon Capture,...

328

Attached PARTICIPANTS: NRC DOE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will provide a walk-through of its license application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain,

unknown authors

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

329

DOE Coordination Meeting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the formation of a Safety Review Panel, by 2004; * Integrate safety procedures into all DOE project funding procurements. This will ensure that all projects that involve the...

330

DOE Corporate Overview - 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy, 2012 Section One, page 1 U.S. Department of Energy, 2012 Section One, page 1 SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Welcome to the Department of Energy. This book provides an overview of the Department of Energy (DOE). The opening sections describe the mission areas, organizational structure and upcoming critical issues of the Department, followed by brief descriptions of DOE's goals and programs. Later sections provide overviews of the Department's budget, staffing, contract management, project management, Congressional jurisdiction, Government Accountability Office (GAO) and DOE's Inspector General (IG) oversight and DOE high-visibility

331

EM Rolls Ahead of DOE Goals to Trim Vehicle Fleet Inventory | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rolls Ahead of DOE Goals to Trim Vehicle Fleet Inventory Rolls Ahead of DOE Goals to Trim Vehicle Fleet Inventory EM Rolls Ahead of DOE Goals to Trim Vehicle Fleet Inventory March 12, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Workers use this mobile survey vehicle in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act work at the Hanford site to survey remediated areas for radiological contamination. Workers use this mobile survey vehicle in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act work at the Hanford site to survey remediated areas for radiological contamination. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM exceeded a DOE goal to reduce its vehicle fleet inventory, advancing the Department's broader initiative to cut greenhouse gas emissions and decrease petroleum consumption across the complex. With a 45 percent cut to its fleet in fiscal year 2012, EM beat the Department's goal of a 35 percent drop by fiscal year 2013 a year early.

332

DOE-owned spent nuclear fuel strategic plan. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for safely and efficiently managing DOE-owned spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and SNF returned to the US from foreign research reactors (FRR). The fuel will be treated where necessary, packaged suitable for repository disposal where practicable, and placed in interim dry storage. These actions will remove remaining vulnerabilities, make as much spent fuel as possible ready for ultimate disposition, and substantially reduce the cost of continued storage. The goal is to complete these actions in 10 years. This SNF Strategic Plan updates the mission, vision, objectives, and strategies for the management of DOE-owned SNF articulated by the SNF Strategic Plan issued in December 1994. The plan describes the remaining issues facing the EM SNF Program, lays out strategies for addressing these issues, and identifies success criteria by which program progress is measured. The objectives and strategies in this plan are consistent with the following Em principles described by the Assistance Secretary in his June 1996 initiative to establish a 10-year time horizon for achieving most program objectives: eliminate and manage the most serious risks; reduce mortgage and support costs to free up funds for further risk reduction; protect worker health and safety; reduce generation of wastes; create a collaborative relationship between DOE and its regulators and stakeholders; focus technology development on cost and risk reduction; and strengthen management and financial control.

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

DOE standard: Radiological control  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed this Standard to assist line managers in meeting their responsibilities for implementing occupational radiological control programs. DOE has established regulatory requirements for occupational radiation protection in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 835 (10 CFR 835), ``Occupational Radiation Protection``. Failure to comply with these requirements may lead to appropriate enforcement actions as authorized under the Price Anderson Act Amendments (PAAA). While this Standard does not establish requirements, it does restate, paraphrase, or cite many (but not all) of the requirements of 10 CFR 835 and related documents (e.g., occupational safety and health, hazardous materials transportation, and environmental protection standards). Because of the wide range of activities undertaken by DOE and the varying requirements affecting these activities, DOE does not believe that it would be practical or useful to identify and reproduce the entire range of health and safety requirements in this Standard and therefore has not done so. In all cases, DOE cautions the user to review any underlying regulatory and contractual requirements and the primary guidance documents in their original context to ensure that the site program is adequate to ensure continuing compliance with the applicable requirements. To assist its operating entities in achieving and maintaining compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835, DOE has established its primary regulatory guidance in the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides. This Standard supplements the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides and serves as a secondary source of guidance for achieving compliance with 10 CFR 835.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Basal cell carcinoma does metastasize  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Basal cell carcinoma does metastasize Doruk Ozgediz MD 1 ,illustrates that, in fact, BCC does metastasize and if left

Ozgediz, Doruk; Smith, EB; Zheng, Jie; Otero, Jose; Tabatabai, Z Laura; Corvera, Carlos U

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

Starbucks cups : trash or treasure? : an example of facilitated systems thinking assisting stakeholders in designing their own system to recycle take-away cups  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A mixed methods, action-research study was conducted to assess the efficacy and usefulness of Facilitated Systems Thinking as an intervention for system design in complex, multi-stakeholder systems, especially where the ...

Czaika, Ellen Gail

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

336

Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project, fiscal year 1995 annual report to stakeholders  

SciTech Connect

In 1978, Congress authorized the DOE to assess and clean up contamination at 24 designated former uranium processing sites. The DOE is also responsible for cleaning up properties in the vicinity of the sites where wind and water erosion deposited tailings or people removed them from the site for use in construction or landscaping projects. Cleanup is being undertaken in cooperation with state governments and Indian tribes within whose boundaries the sites are located. It is being conducted in two phases: the surface project and the ground water project. This report addresses specifics about both phases of the UMTRA Project. DOE`s UMTRA Project is the world`s largest materials management project ever undertaken to reduce or eliminate risk to the general public from exposure to potentially hazardous and radioactive materials. With an estimated cost at completion of nearly $2 billion for both phases of the UMTRA Project, and with the responsibility for encapsulating and isolating almost one-fourth of all the uranium mill tailings generated across the entire US (more than 44 million cubic yards), the UMTRA Project and its people have achieved a long record of safely and effectively completing its mission. It continually enhances its national reputation through its diligent process and cost efficiency as well as its international recognition for its technological innovation.

NONE

1995-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

337

DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 of 139 3.0 HAZARD ANALYSIS 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter provides tools for assessing electrical hazards error. This chapter does not provide an exhaustive list of sources of electrical energy

338

DOE Information Bridge  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DOE Information Bridge, a component of EnergyFiles, provides free, convenient, and quick access to full-text DOE research and development reports in physics, chemistry, materials, biology, environmental sciences, energy technologies, engineering, computer and information science, renewable energy, and other topics. This vast collection includes over 43,000 reports that have been received and processed by OSTI since January 1995.

United States. Department of Energy. Office of Scientific and Technical Information

339

DOE/ID-Number  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

54 54 Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Draft November 2013 DOE/EA-1954 Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Draft November 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE Idaho Operations Office ii CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................. v

340

DOE Patents Database - About  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

About DOepatents About DOepatents DOepatents, developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), is a searchable database of patent information resulting from DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D). Included here are patents that DOE sponsored through a variety of funding mechanisms, including grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements. Comprehensive coverage of DOE patent information is one way to demonstrate the Department's contribution to scientific progress in the physical sciences and other disciplines. Publicly available patent information from DOE R&D, historic and current, is presented here, excluding patent applications. DOepatents consists of bibliographic records, with full text where available, either via a PDF file or an HTML link to the record at the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

DOE Energy Innovation Hubs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Research » DOE Energy Research » DOE Energy Innovation Hubs Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Materials Sciences & Engineering (MSE) Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences (CSGB) Accelerator and Detector Research Research Conduct Policies DOE Energy Innovation Hubs Energy Frontier Research Centers National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) News & Resources Contact Information Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-22/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3081 F: (301) 903-6594 E: sc.bes@science.doe.gov More Information » Research DOE Energy Innovation Hubs Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds

342

DOE CORPORATE REPORTING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7/23/2010 7/23/2010 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) CORPORATE REPORTING To ensure projects are effectively managed and delivering on the goals of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act), DOE will collect data on project management and execution, risk management, job creation, and key project milestones, in addition to what is required by Section 1512 of the Recovery Act. In most cases, monthly data will be used internally for managerial purposes only, but where DOE does intend to publicize monthly data, it will clearly indicate it to be "preliminary/informal and subject to change." Recipients are required to provide DOE information on, but not limited to, the following issues:

343

DOE Patents Database - Widget  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Get the DOepatents Widget... Get the DOepatents Widget... Download the DOepatents widget to find DOE patent data, read news about DOE inventions, and browse the most-viewed patents. You may download and install this widget using the html inclusion code. Get the DOepatents widget and many other great free widgets at Widgetbox! Not seeing a widget? (More info) Widget Features Search: Find patent information resulting from DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) dating from the 1940s to today. Most Viewed: Browse the most frequently viewed patent records. News: Read about highlighted DOE inventions and inventors. Featured: View recently issued patents and patents owned exclusively by DOE. Contact: Send comments or questions about this collection. XML: Link directly to the DOepatents XML data service, with help and

344

DOE Grids Service Transition  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Grids Service Transition DOE Grids Service Transition Services Overview ECS Audio/Video Conferencing Fasterdata IPv6 Network Network Performance Tools (perfSONAR) ESnet OID Registry PGP Key Service Virtual Circuits (OSCARS) DOE Grids Service Transition Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net DOE Grids Service Transition Background ESnet has decided to transition support and management for the certificate services provided by the DOE Grids public key infrastructure (PKI) to the Open Sciences Grid (OSG). OSG and ESnet provide service to many of the same user communities, and have long been collaborators in the areas of identity

345

DOE-2 basics  

SciTech Connect

DOE-2 provides the building design and research communities with an up-to-date, unbiased, well-documented public-domain computer program for building energy analysis. DOE-2 predicts the hourly energy use and energy cost of a building given hourly weather information and a description of the building and its HVAC equipment and utility rate structure. DOE-2 is a portable FORTRAN program that can be used on a large variety of computers, including PC`s. Using DOE-2, designers can determine the choice of building parameters that improve energy efficiency while maintaining thermal comfort. The purpose of DOE-2 is to aid in the analysis of energy usage in buildings; it is not intended to be the sole source of information relied upon for the design of buildings. The judgment and experience of the architect/engineer still remain the most important elements of building design.

Not Available

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

DOE-2 basics  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

DOE-2 provides the building design and research communities with an up-to-date, unbiased, well-documented public-domain computer program for building energy analysis. DOE-2 predicts the hourly energy use and energy cost of a building given hourly weather information and a description of the building and its HVAC equipment and utility rate structure. DOE-2 is a portable FORTRAN program that can be used on a large variety of computers, including PC's. Using DOE-2, designers can determine the choice of building parameters that improve energy efficiency while maintaining thermal comfort. The purpose of DOE-2 is to aid in the analysis of energy usage in buildings; it is not intended to be the sole source of information relied upon for the design of buildings. The judgment and experience of the architect/engineer still remain the most important elements of building design.

Not Available

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Residential-Scale 30-Meter Wind Maps  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Residential-Scale 30-Meter Wind Maps Residential-Scale 30-Meter Wind Maps The Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative provides 30-meter (m) height, high-resolution wind resource maps for the United States. Businesses, farms, and homeowners use residential-scale wind resource maps to identify wind sites that may be appropriate for small-scale wind projects. A wind resource map of the United States. Go to the California wind resource map. Go to the Washington wind resource map. Go to the Oregon wind resource map. Go to the Idaho wind resource map. Go to the Nevada wind resource map. Go to the Montana wind resource map. Go to the Wyoming wind resource map. Go to the Utah wind resource map. Go to the Colorado wind resource map. Go to the Arizona wind resource map. Go to the New Mexico wind resource map. Go to the North Dakota wind resource map. Go to the South Dakota wind resource map. Go to the Nebraska wind resource map. Go to the Kansas wind resource map. Go to the Oklahoma wind resource map. Go to the Texas wind resource map. Go to the Minnesota wind resource map. Go to the Iowa wind resource map. Go to the Missouri wind resource map. Go to the Arkansas wind resource map. Go to the Louisiana wind resource map. Go to the Wisconsin wind resource map. Go to the Illinois wind resource map. Go to the Indiana wind resource map. Go to the Michigan wind resource map. Go to the Ohio wind resource map. Go to the Kentucky wind resource map. Go to the Tennessee wind resource map. Go to the Mississippi wind resource map. Go to the Alabama wind resource map. Go to the Florida wind resource map. Go to the Georgia wind resource map. Go to the South Carolina wind resource map. Go to the North Carolina wind resource map. Go to the Virginia wind resource map. Go to the West Virginia wind resource map. Go to the Pennsylvania wind resource map. Go to the Maryland wind resource map. Go to the Delaware wind resource map. Go to the New Jersey wind resource map. Go to the New York wind resource map. Go to the Connecticut wind resource map. Go to the Rhode Island wind resource map. Go to the Massachusetts wind resource map. Go to the Vermont wind resource map. Go to the New Hampshire wind resource map. Go to the Maine wind resource map. Go to the Alaska wind resource map. Go to the Hawaii wind resource map.

348

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Community-Scale 50-Meter Wind Maps  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Community-Scale 50-Meter Wind Maps Community-Scale 50-Meter Wind Maps The Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach initiative provides 50-meter (m) height, high-resolution wind resource maps for most of the states and territories of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands in the United States. Counties, towns, utilities, and schools use community-scale wind resource maps to locate and quantify the wind resource, identifying potentially windy sites determining a potential site's economic and technical viability. Map of the updated wind resource assessment status for the United States. Go to the Washington wind resource map. Go to the Oregon wind resource map. Go to the California wind resource map. Go to the Nevada wind resource map. Go to the Idaho wind resource map. Go to the Utah wind resource map. Go to the Arizona wind resource map. Go to the Montana wind resource map. Go to the Wyoming wind resource map. Go to the Colorado wind resource map. Go to the New Mexico wind resource map. Go to the North Dakota wind resource map. Go to the South Dakota wind resource map. Go to the Nebraska wind resource map. Go to the Kansas wind resource map. Go to the Oklahoma wind resource map. Go to the Missouri wind resource map. Go to the Alaska wind resource map. Go to the Hawaii wind resource map. Go to the Michigan wind resource map. Go to the Illinois wind resource map. Go to the Indiana wind resource map. Go to the Ohio wind resource map. Go to the North Carolina wind resource map. Go to the Virginia wind resource map. Go to the Maryland wind resource map. Go to the West Virginia wind resource map. Go to the Pennsylvania wind resource map. Go to the Rhode Island wind resource map. Go to the Connecticut wind resource map. Go to the Massachusetts wind resource map. Go to the Vermont wind resource map. Go to the New Hampshire wind resource map. Go to the Maine wind resource map. Go to the Kentucky wind resource map. Go to the Tennessee wind resource map. Go to the Arkansas wind resource map. Go to the Puerto Rico wind resource map. Go to the U.S. Virgin Islands wind resource map. Go to the New Jersey wind resource map. Go to the Delaware wind resource map.

349

DOE`s Advanced Turbine Systems Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper discusses the Advanced Turbine Systems (ATS) Program, which is necessary to achieve METC`s vision for future IGCC systems. This major new program is a cooperative effort in which DOE`s Office of Fossil Energy (FE) and Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy (CE) are joining forces with the private sector to develop ultra-high efficiency gas turbine systems. A goal of this Program is to have a utility-size gas turbine with a 60 percent efficiency (lower heating value basis (LHV)) ready for commercialization by the year 2002. (While this paper focuses on utility-size turbines which are the primary interest of this audience, an ultra-high efficiency, industrial-size gas turbine will also be developed in the ATS Program with a comparable improvement in efficiency.) Natural gas is the target fuel of the Program, a recognition by DOE that natural gas will play a significant role in supplying future power generation needs in the US. However, to insure that the US has fuel supply options, ATS designs will be adaptable to coal and biomass fuels. Therefore, the ATS Program will directly benefit IGCC and other advanced coal based power generation systems. Cost and efficiency improvements in the turbine system as well as in the gasification and gas stream cleanup plant sections will enable IGCC to reach a cost target of $1,000--$1,280/kW and an efficiency goal of 52 percent (higher heating value basis (HHV)) in the post-2000 market.

Bechtel, T.F.; Bajura, R.A.; Salvador, L.A.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

350

Memorandum To: GENERAL COUNSEL, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) From: JONATHAN MELCHI, HEATING, AIR-CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

To: GENERAL COUNSEL, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) To: GENERAL COUNSEL, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) From: JONATHAN MELCHI, HEATING, AIR-CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION DISTRIBUTORS INTERNATIONAL (HARDI) Date: 1/12/2012 Subject: EX PARTE COMMUNICATION MEMO DOE ATTENDEES: Ashley Armstrong, John Cymbalsky, David Case, Laura Barhydt HARDI ATTENDEES: Talbot Gee, Jonathan Melchi AREAS OF DISCUSSION: DOE Framework Document and Stakeholder Meeting regarding the Enforcement of the updated Energy Conservation Standards for Air Conditioners, Furnaces and Heat Pumps. The meeting took place on Thursday January 5 th , 2012 from 2pm to 3-pm. The following topics were discussed. 1.) Sell-Through. HARDI asked for clarification on the DOE's notation on the Framework Document

351

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: External Coordination  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mission and Goals Mission and Goals Organization Chart and Contacts Background Budget Timeline Program Activities Advisory Panels External Coordination U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > About > External Coordination Printable Version External Coordination The DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program leverages the vast capabilities and experience of its stakeholders through cooperative partnerships. Coordination of these activities will be one of the keys to achieving national hydrogen and fuel cell technology program goals. Federal Agencies/Interagency Task Force A number of federal agencies support hydrogen and fuel cell research, development, demonstration, and deployment activities. There are two interagency bodies that coordinate this work: The Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Interagency Working Group (IWG) is a

352

DOE Policies | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Policies DOE Policies DOE Policies Cyber Security DOE O 205.1B Department of Energy Cyber Security Management (Approved May 16, 2011) Information Management Planning DOE Guide to IT Capital Planning and Investment, September 2010 (pdf) DOE IRM Strategic Plan, FY 2009 - 2011 (pdf) DOE N 203.1, Software Quality Assurance (pdf) DOE G 242.1-1, Forms Management Guide (pdf) DOE O 203.1 Limited Personal Use of Government Office Equipment Including Information Technology (pdf) Information Management Program Order, DOE O 200.1A (pdf) (Access to this document is restricted to DOE employees only) Records Management DOE Directive, O 243.1, Records Management Program (pdf) DOE Directive, O 243.2, Vital Records (pdf) DOE Directive, O 200.2, Information Collection Management Program

353

DOE G 200  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

G 200.1-1A G 200.1-1A Department of Energy (DOE) Systems Engineering Methodology Version 3 The DOE Systems Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for Information Technology Investments September 2002 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of the Chief Information Officer Date: September 2002 Page Rev Date: i TITLE PAGE Document Name: Department of Energy Systems Engineering Methodology (SEM) The DOE Systems Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for Information Technology Investments Publication Date: Original March 1996; Revised November 1997 Version 2 March 1999 Version 3 September 2002 Approval: ___________________________________ Karen Evans, Chief Information Officer ___________________________________ Brenda Coblentz, Program Manager, Software Quality & Systems Engineering

354

DOE Digital Photo Archive  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

The DOE Digital Photo Archive is a resource made available to the DOE community as well as the general public for the purposes of enhancing communication, education, and ultimately the overall mission of the Department of Energy (DOE). The images in the Archive are downloadable as low resolution JPG files and may easily and quickly be requested in high resolution. The database can be browsed or is searchable by science program, sites by name, geographic locations, etc. Each photo has a caption or brief summary, and most are not copyrighted.

355

DOE Site List  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Links Links Central Internet Database CID Photo Banner DOE Site List Site Geo Site Code State Operations Office1 DOE Programs Generating Streams at Site DOE Programs Managing Facilities Associated Data2 Acid/Pueblo Canyons ACPC NM Oak Ridge Waste/Media, Facilities Airport Substation CA Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Hill Communication Site CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Substation CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities AL Complex NM Albuquerque DP Facilities Alba Craft ALCL OH Oak Ridge Facilities Albany Research Center AMRC OR Oak Ridge Facilities Alcova Switchyard WY Western Area Power Administration Facilities Aliquippa Forge ALFO PA Oak Ridge Facilities

356

DOE Distribution Workshop Attendees  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Laurie Actman Deputy Director EEB Hub Chris Ainscough Senior Engineer National renewable Energy Joe Allen Director of Government Relations Caterpillar / Solar Turbines Robert Anders Mr. U.S. Department of Energy - EERE David Anderson Technology Development Manager Department of Energy Sam Baldwin Chief Science Officer EERE/DOE Thomas Baldwin Conv Renewables Group Lead Idaho National Venkat Banunarayanan Grid Integration & Solar Forecasting Department of Energy - SunShot Vincent Battaglia Deputy Department Head ESDR LBNL Gil Bindewald General Engineer US DOE/Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Anjan Bose Grid Tech Team Lead DOE/Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Ralph Braccio

357

DOE Average Results  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE DOE Average Results FY 12 DOE Target FY 12 Customer Perspective: Customer Satisfaction: -Timeliness 92 88 -Quality 94 92 Effective Service Partnership: -Extent of Customer Satisfaction with the responsiveness, etc. 90 92 Internal Business Perspective: Acquisition Excellence: -Extent to which internal quality control systems are effective 90 88 Most Effective Use of Contracting Approaches to Maximize Efficiency and Cost Effectiveness: Use of Competition: -% of total $'s obligated on competitive acquisitions >$3000 (Agency Level Only) 94 85 -% of acquisition actions competed for actions > $3000 (Agency Level Only) 65 68 Performance Based Acquisition: - % PBA actions relative to total eligible new acquisition actions (applicable to new actions > $25K) 82

358

ESTABLISHING FINAL END STATE FOR A RETIRED NUCLEAR WEAPONS PRODUCTION REACTOR; COLLABORATION BETWEEN STAKEHOLDERS, REGULATORS, AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT - 11052  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Savannah River Site (SRS) is a 310-square-mile United States Department of Energy nuclear facility located along the Savannah River (SRS) near Aiken, South Carolina. Nuclear weapons material production began in the early 1950s, utilizing five production reactors. In the early 1990s all SRS production reactor operations were terminated. The first reactor closure end state declaration was recently institutionalized in a Comprehensive Environmental Response and Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Early Action Record of Decision. The decision for the final closure of the 318,000 square foot 105-P Reactor was determined to be in situ decommissioning (ISD). ISD is an acceptable and cost effective alternative to off-site disposal for the reactor building, which will allow for consolidation of remedial action wastes generated from other cleanup activities within the P Area. ISD is considered protective by the regulators, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), public and stakeholders as waste materials are stabilized/immobilized, and radioactivity is allowed to naturally decay, thus preventing future exposure to the environment. Stakeholder buy-in was critical in the upfront planning in order to achieve this monumental final decision. Numerous public meetings and workshops were held in two different states (covering a 200 mile radius) with stakeholder and SRS Citizens Advisory Board participation. These meetings were conducted over an eight month period as the end state decision making progressed. Information provided to the public evolved from workshop to workshop as data became available and public input from the public meetings were gathered. ISD is being considered for the balance of the four SRS reactors and other hardened facilities such as the chemical Separation Facilities (canyons).

Bergren, C.; Flora, M.; Belencan, H.

2010-11-17T23:59:59.000Z

359

ESTABLISHING FINAL END STATE FOR A RETIRED NUCLEAR WEAPONS PRODUCTION REACTOR; COLLABORATION BETWEEN STAKEHOLDERS, REGULATORS AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Savannah River Site (SRS) is a 310-square-mile United States Department of Energy nuclear facility located along the Savannah River (SRS) near Aiken, South Carolina. Nuclear weapons material production began in the early 1950s, utilizing five production reactors. In the early 1990s all SRS production reactor operations were terminated. The first reactor closure end state declaration was recently institutionalized in a Comprehensive Environmental Response and Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Early Action Record of Decision. The decision for the final closure of the 318,000 square foot 105-P Reactor was determined to be in situ decommissioning (ISD). ISD is an acceptable and cost effective alternative to off-site disposal for the reactor building, which will allow for consolidation of remedial action wastes generated from other cleanup activities within the P Area. ISD is considered protective by the regulators, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), public and stakeholders as waste materials are stabilized/immobilized, and radioactivity is allowed to naturally decay, thus preventing future exposure to the environment. Stakeholder buy-in was critical in the upfront planning in order to achieve this monumental final decision. Numerous public meetings and workshops were held in two different states (covering a 200 mile radius) with stakeholder and SRS Citizens Advisory Board participation. These meetings were conducted over an eight month period as the end state decision making progressed. Information provided to the public evolved from workshop to workshop as data became available and public input from the public meetings were gathered. ISD is being considered for the balance of the four SRS reactors and other hardened facilities such as the chemical processing canyons.

Bergren, C

2009-01-16T23:59:59.000Z

360

DOE Strengthens Public Registry to Track Greenhouse Gas Emissions |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Registry to Track Greenhouse Gas Emissions Public Registry to Track Greenhouse Gas Emissions DOE Strengthens Public Registry to Track Greenhouse Gas Emissions April 17, 2006 - 10:20am Addthis Announces Revised Guidelines for U.S. Companies to Report and Register Reductions WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman today announced revised guidelines for the department's Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, known as "1605 (b)" that encourage broader reporting of emissions and sequestration by utilities, and industries, as well as small businesses and institutions. The revised guidelines strengthen the existing public registry for emissions and sequestration data and introduce new methods for U.S. businesses and institutions to calculate entity-wide emission reductions that contribute to the President's goal of substantially

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Summary of Needs and Opportunities from the 2011 Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholders Meeting: Atlanta, Georgia -- March 16-18, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Needs and Needs and Opportunities from the 2011 Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholders Meeting Atlanta, Georgia - March 16-18, 2011 May 2011 ii NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or

362

Environmental Justice and Federal Facilities: Recommendations for Improving Stakeholder Relations Between Federal Facilities and Enviornmental Justice Communities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

J J FEDERAL FACILITIES R IMPROVING S R BETWEEN FEDERAL F E JUSTICE COMMUNITIES October 2004 Prepared by the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council Waste and Facility Siting Subcommittee Federal Facilities Working Group NVIRONMENTAL USTICE AND ECOMMENDATIONS FOR TAKEHOLDER ELATIONS ACILITIES AND NVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND FEDERAL FACILITIES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS BETWEEN FEDERAL FACILITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES October 2004 Prepared by the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council Waste and Facility Siting Subcommittee Federal Facilities Working Group ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Federal Facilities Working Group of the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council's (NEJAC) Waste and Facility Siting Subcommittee wishes to acknowledge and thank the organizations and individuals

363

Final Report - Facilitating Wind Energy: Addressing Challenges around Visual Impacts, Noise, Credible Data, and Local Benefits through Creative Stakeholder Engagement  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The project team consisting of the Consensus Building Institute, Inc., Raab Associates, Ltd., and the MIT-Harvard Program on Negotiation created a model and set of tools for building the capacity of state officials to effectively collaborate with diverse stakeholders in advancing wind development policy formation, wind facility siting, and transmission policy and siting. The model was used to enhance the ability of state officials to advance wind development in their states. Training was delivered in Cambridge, MA, in Spring 2011. The training and associated materials, including a Wind Energy Workbook, website, and simulations, is available for ongoing and widespread dissemination throughout the US.

Kate Harvey; Patrick Field; Elizabeth Fierman; Dr. Jonathan Raab; Dr. Lawrence Susskind

2011-08-04T23:59:59.000Z

364

DOE/EA-1807  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE WIND ENERGY PROJECT NORMAL, MCLEAN COUNTY, ILLINOIS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office DECEMBER 2010 DOE/EA 1807 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE WIND ENERGY PROJECT NORMAL, MCLEAN COUNTY, ILLINOIS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office DECEMBER 2010 DOE/EA 1807 iii December 2010 C OV E R S HE E T R E SPONSI B L E A G E NC Y : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) T I T L E : Final Environmental Assessment for Heartland Community College Wind Energy Project, Normal, McLean County, Illinois (DOE/EA 1807). C ONT A C T : For additional copies or more information on this Environmental Assessment

365

DOE Conducts Annual  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

INSIDE 2 Collider Detectors Emerge 3 KTeV Tests Cesium Iodide Calorimeter 4 Annual Funding Cycle Begins 5 DOE Moves Toward U.S.-CERN Collaboration 8 Pine Street Entrance to...

366

DOE Data Explorer  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

OSTI Home DDE Home DDE FAQs Help Site Map Contact Us Save searches, create alerts and export data :Sign In orCreate Account DOE Data Explorer Search Find Advanced Search Options...

367

DOE Data Explorer -  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

OSTI Home DDE Home DDE FAQs Help Site Map Contact Us Save searches, create alerts and export data :Sign In orCreate Account DOE Data Explorer Search Find Advanced Search Options...

368

DOE Removes Brookhaven Contractor  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Removes DOE Removes Brookhaven Contractor Peña sends a message to DOE facilities nationwide INSIDE 2 Accelerator Rx 4 FermiKids 6 Spring at Fermilab Photos courtesy of Brookhaven National Laboratory by Judy Jackson, Office of Public Affairs Secretary of Energy Federico Peña announced on Thursday, May 1, that the Department of Energy would immediately terminate the current management contract with Associated Universities, Inc. at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York. Peña said that he made the decision after receiving the results of a laboratory safety management review conducted by the independent oversight arm of DOE's Office of Environment, Safety and Health. In addition, the Secretary said he found unacceptable "the continued on page 8 Volume 20 Friday, May 16, 1997

369

DOE Reg. Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 4, 2012 January 4, 2012 Page 1 January 4, 2012 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. AHRI had submitted comments on March 21, 2011 in response to the previous Request for Information (RFI) issued by DOE in February of 2011. We appreciate DOE's commitment to maintaining a plan for regular, periodic review of its existing regulations and reporting

370

DOE Robotics Project  

SciTech Connect

This document provide the bimonthly progress reports on the Department of Energy (DOE) Robotics Project by the University of Michigan. Reports are provided for the time periods of December 90/January 91 through June 91/July 91. (FI)

Not Available

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

DOE Differing Professional Opinions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE has established a variety of work processes for its employees (including DOE Federal, contractor, and subcontractor employees) to raise concerns so that they are assessed and appropriate actions are taken. Employees are to use these processes to resolve issues at the lowest possible level. In rare cases, an employee may decide that despite those efforts, there remains a concern about a technical issue with a potential for a significant impact on environment, safety or health.

372

DOE to Invest $250 Million in New Bioenergy Centers | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

$250 Million in New Bioenergy Centers $250 Million in New Bioenergy Centers DOE to Invest $250 Million in New Bioenergy Centers August 2, 2006 - 4:48pm Addthis Basic Genomics Research on the Development of Biofuels to be Accelerated JOLIET, IL - U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Samuel W. Bodman announced today that DOE will spend $250 million to establish and operate two new Bioenergy Research Centers to accelerate basic research on the development of cellulosic ethanol and other biofuels. The Secretary made the announcement with Congressman Jerry Weller (IL-11th), local officials and biofuels stakeholders during a visit to Channahon, IL. "This is an important step toward our goal of replacing 30 percent of transportation fuels with biofuels by 2030," Secretary Bodman said. "The

373

DOE Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Summaries  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Summaries DOE Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Summaries February 21, 2013 - 2:35pm Addthis DOE's Grid Tech Team issued a notice of availability and request for comments on the Electrical Grid Integration Technical Workshop summaries. Public comments on summaries from the distribution system and transmission system workshops will be accepted until March 25, 2013. The complete Federal Register Notice, including details on how to submit comments, is available for download. Addthis Related Articles DOE Convenes Multi-stakeholder Process to Address Privacy for Data Enabled by Smart Grid Technologies Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for Electric Transmission Projects Requiring

374

DOE Issues Energy Sector Cyber Organization NOI, Feb 2010 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Issues Energy Sector Cyber Organization NOI, Feb 2010 Issues Energy Sector Cyber Organization NOI, Feb 2010 DOE Issues Energy Sector Cyber Organization NOI, Feb 2010 The Department of Energy's (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) announced on Jan. 7 that it intends to issue a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) for a National Energy Sector Cyber Organization, envisioned as a partnership between the federal government and energy sector stakeholders to protect the bulk power electric grid and aid the integration of smart grid technology to enhance the security of the grid. DOE Issues Energy Sector Cyber Organization NOI More Documents & Publications FAQ: Funding Opportunity Announcement-Smart Grid Investment Grants Grantsdown.xls Before the House Science and Technology Subcommittee on Energy and

375

Summary and Findings from the NREL/DOE Hydrogen Sensor Workshop (June 8, 2011)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

On June 8, 2011, DOE/NREL hosted a hydrogen sensor workshop attended by nearly forty participants from private organizations, government facilities, and academic institutions . The workshop participants represented a cross section of stakeholders in the hydrogen community, including sensor developers, end users, site safety officials, and code and standards developers. The goals of the workshop were to identify critical applications for the emerging hydrogen infrastructure that require or would benefit from hydrogen sensors, to assign performance specifications for sensor deployed in each application, and to identify shortcomings or deficiencies (i.e., technical gaps) in the ability of current sensor technology to meet the assigned performance requirements.

Buttner, W.; Burgess, R.; Post, M.; Rivkin, C.

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

Toward a broader vision for Information Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In December of 2009, several founders of the Information Systems (IS) academic discipline gathered for a panel discussion at the International Conference on Information Systems to present their visions for the future of the field, and their comments ... Keywords: Design science, emerging technologies, health care, information systems impacts, information systems vision, innovations, model of graduate, model of professional, new technologies, professional communications, publications, research methods, systems requirements, university-wide resource

Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr.; Robert O. Briggs

2011-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

Researchers Say 'Frustrated Magnets' Hint at Broader ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... including the assembly of quarks and other minuscule components into atoms, the ... a phase transition, at which a highly symmetrical, long-range ...

2013-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

378

DOE Technical Standards Program: Recently Approved DOE Technical...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Recently Approved DOE Technical Standards Office of Nuclear Safety This page lists DOE technical standards that have been approved and added to the distribution. If they are...

379

DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(DOE) Electricity Advisory Committee (EAC) released three reports prepared for the Secretary of Energy's consideration. These reports review challenges facing DOE and the Nation...

380

DOE Launches New Website to Bring Energy Technology Information to the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New Website to Bring Energy Technology Information to New Website to Bring Energy Technology Information to the Public DOE Launches New Website to Bring Energy Technology Information to the Public December 9, 2009 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - Secretary Chu announced today that the Department of Energy is launching Open Energy Information (www.openEI.org) - a new open-source web platform that will make DOE resources and open energy data widely available to the public. The data and tools housed on the free, editable and evolving wiki-platform will be used by government officials, the private sector, project developers, the international community, and others to help deploy clean energy technologies across the country and around the world. The website was launched as part of a broader effort at DOE, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and across

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

USDA and DOE Fund 10 Research Projects to Accelerate Bioenergy Crop  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

USDA and DOE Fund 10 Research Projects to Accelerate Bioenergy Crop USDA and DOE Fund 10 Research Projects to Accelerate Bioenergy Crop Production and Spur Economic Impact USDA and DOE Fund 10 Research Projects to Accelerate Bioenergy Crop Production and Spur Economic Impact August 11, 2011 - 3:55pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC -- The U.S. Departments of Energy and Agriculture have awarded 10 grants totaling $12.2 million to spur research into improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of growing biofuel and bioenergy crops. The investments are part of a broader effort by the Obama administration to develop domestic renewable energy and advanced biofuels, providing a more secure future for America's energy needs and creating new opportunities for the American farming industry. "Biofuels, along with other advanced vehicle technologies, hold the

382

USDA and DOE Fund 10 Research Projects to Accelerate Bioenergy Crop  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

USDA and DOE Fund 10 Research Projects to Accelerate Bioenergy Crop USDA and DOE Fund 10 Research Projects to Accelerate Bioenergy Crop Production and Spur Economic Impact USDA and DOE Fund 10 Research Projects to Accelerate Bioenergy Crop Production and Spur Economic Impact August 11, 2011 - 3:55pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC -- The U.S. Departments of Energy and Agriculture have awarded 10 grants totaling $12.2 million to spur research into improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of growing biofuel and bioenergy crops. The investments are part of a broader effort by the Obama administration to develop domestic renewable energy and advanced biofuels, providing a more secure future for America's energy needs and creating new opportunities for the American farming industry. "Biofuels, along with other advanced vehicle technologies, hold the

383

When Does Aid Conditionality Work?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

GR. Aid conditionality: does foreign aid support autocrats,New York: Routledge; 1998. Knack S. Does foreign aid promotePress; 2000. Remmer KL. Does foreign aid promote the

Montinola, Gabriella R.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

DOE Technical Standards Program: Overview  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of Nuclear Safety Vision The culture of the DOE community will be based on standards. Technical standards will formally integrate part of all DOE facility, program and...

385

DOE Policies | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Regulations OMB Policies Cybersecurity DOE O 205.1B Department of Energy Cyber Security Management (pdf) (Approved May 16, 2011) Information Management Planning DOE...

386

DOE Retro Analysis Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Retro Analysis Plan Retro Analysis Plan August 2, 2011 Page 1 August 2, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the July 11, 2011 Federal Register requesting comments on the Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules. We are encouraged by DOE's efforts to implement Executive Order 13563. We appreciate the actions already taken by DOE to address our concerns regarding the Final Rule on Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Regulations for Consumer Products and Commercial and

387

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices. Please send updates to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov Oct 04, 2013 Forrestal (FORS) Addresses: Germantown (GTN) Addresses: 1000 Independence Ave SW 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585-1290 . Use for U.S. Postal Service mail. 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Use for EXPRESS DELIVERY (e.g. Federal Express, UPS). NAME, OFFICE, E-MAIL FAX ADDRESS PHONE william.bierbower@hq.doe.gov Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy 202-287-6585 FORS AR-1 20585 ARPA-E William Bierbower lori.gray@go.doe.gov Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office 720-356-1568 720-356-1350 Department of Energy

388

DOE F 284  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-284 DOE-284 (10-88) MANDATORY DATA COLLECTION AUTHORIZED BY Public Laws 83-703, 93-438 Previous editions are obsolete. OMB CONTROL NO. 1910-1800 Public Reporting Notice Disclosure on Back NUCLEAR MATERIAL TRANSFER REPORT NUCLEAR MATERIAL ON TRANSFER SHIPPING DATE MATERIAL HAS BEEN VERIFIED AS FOLLOWS (CHECH ONE): DATE RECEIVED FROM (RIS) PIECE COUNT OTHER: SHIPPER'S WEIGHTS AND NUCLEAR MATERIAL CONTENTS ARE ACCEPTED PENDING FINAL VERIFICATION MEASUREMENTS AND COMPLETION OF DOE/NRC FORM 741 CONTAINER COUNT BY (ACCOUNTABILITY REPRESENTATIVE) (See instructions for provisions regarding confidentiality.) GROSS WEIGHT CHECK TO (RIS) NO. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 18. U.S.C., SECTION 1001, ACT OF JUNE 25, 1948; 62 STAT. 749, MAKES IT A CRIMINAL OFFENSE TO MAKE A WILLFULLY FALSE STATEMENT OR REPRESENTATION TO ANY DEPARTMENT

389

DOE Exascale Initiative  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Exascale Initiative Dimitri Kusnezov, Senior Advisor to the Secretary, US DOE Steve Binkley, Senior Advisor, Office of Science, US DOE Bill Harrod, Office of Science/ASCR Bob Meisner, Defense Programs/ASC Briefing to the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, September 13, 2013 The Department of Energy is planning for a major computer and computational science initiative anchored in our mission challenges. We use the term 'exascale' to capture the successful transition to the next era of computing in the 2020 timeframe. Change is coming in many ways, not just technology. For instance: World we were in World we are going to Processing/ Processing expensive/ Processing free/ Memory: memory free memory expensive Ecosystem US micro-electronics Globalization of supply chain

390

DOE Roadmap: Chapter 2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2. Narratives and Records Series Descriptions 2. Narratives and Records Series Descriptions Introduction This chapter contains two kinds of information. The first consists of brief narrative histories that discuss the involvement of the Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies with human radiation experiments. These histories cover agency headquarters elements and the various field sites that had significant involvement in experiment activities. The second category of information is series descriptions for groups of original records that are pertinent to either individual experiments or to the organizational context in which they took place. Since many of these records still reside at DOE sites, series descriptions are appended to the narrative for each facility. Where records are not in the custody of DOE, they are listed under their custodial organization (such as the National Archives).

391

DOE/EIS-0380  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 FISCAL YEAR 2011 MITIGATION ACTION PLAN ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE 2008 LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APRIL 2012 LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE 3747 West Jemez Road, MS A-316 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 DISCLAIMER: This document was prepared by Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS) in their role as management and operations (M&O) contractor for the Los Alamos National Laboratory, under contract to DOE/NNSA (Contract Number DE-AC52-06NA25396). DOE/NNSA LASO has reviewed this document for content and accuracy. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Officer for DOE/NNSA LASO concurs with this document. LA-UR-11-06159 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

392

DOE Hydrogen Program Overview  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Fuel Cells and Fuel Cells Mark Paster U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Program January, 2005 A Bold New Approach is Required 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Petroleum (MMB/Day Oil Equivalent) Actual Projection U.S. Oil Production EIA 2003 Base Case Extended Oil Consumption With Average Fuel Efficiency Automobile & Light Truck Oil Use U.S. Transportation Oil Consumption U.S. Refinery Capacity Source: DOE/EIA, International Petroleum Statistics Reports, April 1999; DOE/EIA 0520, International Energy Annual 1997, DOE/EIA0219(97), February 1999. 0 20 40 60 80 100 Rest of World OPEC US Percentage of Total Consumption Production Reserves 2% 12% 26% 7% 41% 77% 67% 47% 21% World Oil Reserves are Consolidating in OPEC Nations 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

393

DOE | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

DOE DOE Dataset Summary Description Source EERE Date Released September 27th, 2010 (4 years ago) Date Updated September 27th, 2010 (4 years ago) Keywords buildings commercial buildings DOE energy use Data application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon New construction (xlsx, 277.8 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon Post-1980 construction (in or after 1980) (xlsx, 277.9 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon Pre-1980 construction (xlsx, 253 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Time Period License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) Comment Rate this dataset Usefulness of the metadata

394

GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- - a,- p^A CU ^ ^JL\ CC6p^ w b A GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS Office of Management, November 2008 The DOE Headquarters Forrestal and Germantown buildings have award-winning energy conservation and environmental quality programs focused on making our buildings as green as possible and, enabling them to serve as showcases for the entire Department. Both the Forrestal and the Germantown facilities have earned EPA's Energy Star designation, ranking them among the nation's top buildings in terms of energy performance. Of all the buildings in the U.S. only approximately 4000 have earned this distinction. In addition, the Forrestal Building is one of only two Federal Energy Star Buildings in Washington DC. DOE Headquarters achieved these designations after years of effort by the facility managers and staffs to incorporate energy

395

Wind Powering America's Regional Stakeholder Meetings and Priority State Reports: FY11 Summary  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Beginning in 2010, DOE conducted an assessment of Wind Powering America (WPA) activities to determine whether the methods the department had used to help grow the wind industry to provide 2% of the nation's electrical energy should be the same methods used to achieve 20% of the nation's energy from wind (as described in the report 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy's Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply). After the assessment, it was determined that the initiative's state-based activities should be phased out as part of a shift to regional-based approaches. To assist with this transition, WPA hosted a series of 1-day regional meetings at six strategic locations around the country and a single teleconference for island states, U.S. territories, and remote communities. This report summarizes the results of the inaugural regional meetings and the state reports with a focus on ongoing wind deployment barriers in each region.

Not Available

2013-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

396

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Directives DOE Directives DOE Directives Directives are the Department of Energy's primary means to communicate and institutionalize directives and policies and to establish requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental elements and contractors. DOE O 413.3A - Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets DOE G 413.3-1 - Managing Design and Construction Using Systems Engineering for Use with DOE O 413.3A DOE G 413.3-2 - Quality Assurance Guide for Project Management DOE G 413.3-3 - Safeguards and Security for Program and Project Management DOE G 413.3-8 - Environmental Management (EM) Cleanup Projects DOE G 413.3-9 - U.S. Department of Energy Project Review Guide for Capital Asset Projects DOE G 413.3-10 - Earned Value Management System (EVMS)

397

DOE/ID-Number  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

822 822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 DOE/EA-1822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... iii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ vii

398

DOE/ID-Number  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

76 76 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 DOE/EA-1776 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... v 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................................................. 2

399

DOE/CF-0073  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 DOE/CF-0073 Volume 3 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas

400

Anonymity, accountability & John Doe  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper addresses the issues of anonymity and accountability on the Internet, and the controversy surrounding anonymous message posters who are implicated in defamation lawsuits. "Anonymity ensures governments cannot spy on citizens and thus guarantees ... Keywords: John Doe lawsuits, cyberlibel, internet accountability, internet anonymity

Kristina A. Keesom

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

EFCOG / DOE Electrical Safety  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

&D Decontamination and Decommissioning dc direct current DOE Department of Energy EFCOG Energy Facility Contractors Purpose: This tool is intended to determine the severity of an electrical energy event based reportability. Scope: This tool establishes a standardized approach for tracking and trending electrical energy

402

Does Smoothing Matter?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We study how inhomogeneities modify large scale parameters in General Relativity. For a particular model, we obtain exact results: we compare an infinite string of extremal black holes to a corresponding smooth line with the same mass and charge in five dimensions. We find that the effective energy density does not differ significantly.

Martin Rocek; Patrick van Nieuwenhuizen

2006-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

403

DOE/ID-Number  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 DOE/EA-1776 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ iii

404

DOE/ID-Number  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22 22 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 DOE/EA-1822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... iii

405

DOE Affirms National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Affirms National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Designations DOE Affirms National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Designations DOE Affirms National Interest...

406

DOE Competency Framework | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

managers, and supervisors. DOE Competency Framework More Documents & Publications Federal Employee Training Desk Reference DOE Competency Dictionary DOE General Competencies...

407

DOE | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

DOE DOE Home DOE Wind Vision Community Description: The DOE Wind Program, in close cooperation with the wind industry, is launching a new initiative to revisit the findings of the 2008 DOE 20% The DOE Wind Program, in close cooperation with the wind industry, is launching a new initiative to revisit the findings of the 2008 DOE 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report, and to develop a renewed vision for U.S. wind power research, development, and deployment. Included in this effort will be: community DOE forum Wind Graham7781's picture Submitted by Graham7781(1992) Super contributor 26 April, 2013 - 11:05 OpenEI Showcased in Geothermal Exploration Best Practices Workshop DOE geothermal GTO OpenEI This week, Denver hosted the US DOE Geothermal Technologies Office (GTO) 2013 Peer Review. The purpose of the peer review is to offer geothermal

408

Past DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Information Center DOE Technical Standards Program DOE Technical Standards Procedures Past DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures Past DOE Technical Standards Program...

409

Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Scientific and Technical Information DOE Scientific and Technical Information DOE * OSTI * Go Mobile Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information FAQ * Widget...

410

Approved DOE Technical Standards | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical Standards Approved DOE Technical Standards DOE Technical Standards Program August 16, 2013 Technical Standards, DOE-HDBK-1108-2002 Change Notice 2 (July 2013)...

411

DOE Science Showcase - Neutron Science Research from DOE Databases | OSTI,  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Science Showcase - Neutron Science Research from DOE Databases DOE Science Showcase - Neutron Science Research from DOE Databases Additional neutron science research in DOE Databases Information Bridge Neutron scattering research was pioneered in 1946 by ORNL's Clifford G. Shull, winner of 1994 Nobel Prize in Physics. Access Shull's early research records in Energy Citations Database. Neutron scattering research was pioneered in 1946 by ORNL's Clifford G. Shull, winner of 1994 Nobel Prize in Physics. Access Shull's early research records in Energy Citations Database. Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments DOE R&D Project Summaries DOE Data Explorer DOepatents Researchers at DOE labs, including Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), and Oak Ridge National Laboratory

412

DOE enforcement program roles and responsibilities: DOE handbook  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Price-Anderson Act provides indemnification to DOE contractors who manage and conduct nuclear activities in the DOE complex. The government acts as an insurer for these contractors against any findings of liability from the nuclear activities of the contractor within the scope of its contract. 10 CFR Part 820 establishes the legal framework for implementing DOE`s Nuclear Safety Enforcement Program. Integration with other DOE organizations and programs would assure that the enforcement process properly considers the actual or potential safety significance of a violation when determining an appropriate enforcement sanction. Achieving a proactive contractor compliance assurance rather than a heavy enforcement hand, will require a foundation of cooperation and teamwork across DOE organizations. This handbook identifies the areas of interface for the DOE Enforcement Program and provides guidance on roles and responsibilities for the key DOE organizational areas. It complements DOE-HDBK-1087-95 and 1089-95.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

413

DOE Technical Standards Program: Online Approved DOE Technical Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Online Approved DOE Technical Standards Online Approved DOE Technical Standards No. 1001 – 2000 No. 3001 – 4000 No. 4001 – 5500 No. 5501 – 6000 No. 6001 – 6500 No. 7501 – 7750 Document Number Range 1001 – 2000 Number Title DOE-HDBK-1001-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Instructors (80 pages) PDF (226 KB) DOE-HDBK-1002-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators (70 pages) PDF (311 KB) DOE-HDBK-1003-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Maintenance Personnel (106 pages) PDF (391 KB) DOE-HDBK-1010-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Classical Physics (142 pages) PDF (1120 KB) DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Electrical Science, Volume 1 of 4 (166 pages) PDF (4255 KB)

414

A successful rural school model as perceived by local stakeholders in the Pinewoods Independent School District, Texas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This research was a qualitative case study involving 24 participants of a rural junior/senior high school in East Texas. The purpose of this study was to document the perceptions of students, faculty, administration, and community members in a small rural Texas community, exploring why they perceive their school to be a successful learning environment. The main objective of this basic interpretative case study was to interpret the meaning of how the participants make sense of their lives and their worlds. This study was guided by the following research questions: What factors determine success as identified by stakeholders in Pinewoods Independent School District? How do stakeholders in Pinewoods Independent School District perceive success in their junior/senior high school? The method of inquiry was an informal conversational interview with each participant. These interviews triangulated with a focus group, examination of historical documents, observations, and member checks. The themes revealed in the research included: (a) the rural advantage with three sub-themes, community safe and supportive of its citizens, a community without racial tension, and a nurturing community; (b) pride and tradition with two sub-themes, high expectations and competitive nature of school and school pride; and (c) quality of the school, Pinewoods style with four sub-themes, good discipline in school, dedicated teachers, high expectations in academic and extracurricular activities, and Pinewoods as a successful school. There are implications for policy, practice, and additional research that are necessary for all demographic factors of a rural community. The demographic factors include administrators, teachers, students, and citizens. The intent of the researcher is that the findings of this study be shared with other interested individuals throughout the state and nation to help them better understand how students are taught by a dedicated faculty, staff, and administration, while working through various difficulties such as low socioeconomic students, a continually decreasing community economy, and a lack of sufficient resources for the school.

Centilli, Jeroladette

2008-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

Reducing Onshore Natural Gas and Oil Exploration and Production Impacts Using a Broad-Based Stakeholder Approach  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Never before has the reduction of oil and gas exploration and production impacts been as important as it is today for operators, regulators, non-governmental organizations and individual landowners. Collectively, these stakeholders are keenly interested in the potential benefits from implementing effective environmental impact reducing technologies and practices. This research project strived to gain input and insight from such a broad array of stakeholders in order to identify approaches with the potential to satisfy their diverse objectives. The research team examined three of the most vital issue categories facing onshore domestic production today: (1) surface damages including development in urbanized areas, (2) impacts to wildlife (specifically greater sage grouse), and (3) air pollution, including its potential contribution to global climate change. The result of the research project is a LINGO (Low Impact Natural Gas and Oil) handbook outlining approaches aimed at avoiding, minimizing, or mitigating environmental impacts. The handbook identifies technical solutions and approaches which can be implemented in a practical and feasible manner to simultaneously achieve a legitimate balance between environmental protection and fluid mineral development. It is anticipated that the results of this research will facilitate informed planning and decision making by management agencies as well as producers of oil and natural gas. In 2008, a supplemental task was added for the researchers to undertake a 'Basin Initiative Study' that examines undeveloped and/or underdeveloped oil and natural gas resources on a regional or geologic basin scope to stimulate more widespread awareness and development of domestic resources. Researchers assessed multi-state basins (or plays), exploring state initiatives, state-industry partnerships and developing strategies to increase U.S. oil and gas supplies while accomplishing regional economic and environmental goals.

Amy Childers

2011-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

416

DOE Patents Database - Innovations  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Innovations DOE Innovations Breakthroughs and Award Winners from the last 2 decades... Capillary Electrophoresis Ames Laboratory This technology allows multiple samples of substances to be analyzed simultaneously, providing both speed and accuracy. Has won multiple R&D 100 awards for inventor Ed Yeung and has been licensed by Spectromedix. U.S. Patent Nos. 5,324,401 and 5,582,705. Ultrananocrystalline Diamond (UNCD) Argonne National Laboratory Greatly surpasses other diamond film technologies with commercial potential, and can be used in a broad and diverse range of applications from macro to nanodevices, 2006 FLC Award Winner. U.S. Patent Nos. 5,620,512 and others. T7 Gene Expression System Brookhaven National Laboratory This patent family has been licensed to over 700 commercial entities

417

DOE/EIS-0284  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2007 A-1 2007 A-1 APPENDIX A. OTHER RELATED GHG PROGRAMS AND INITIATIVES The Program is only one program aimed at reducing GHG emissions. There are a number of actions by international entities, presidential initiatives, DOE, other federal agencies, state jurisdictions, and NGOs that, in some way, complement the intent of the Program. The following list of GHG reduction programs is provided for information purposes (and is not necessarily inclusive of all GHG programs and initiatives). A.1 INTERNATIONAL TREATIES, PROGRAMS, AND POLICIES The Rio Climate Treaty was signed in June 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil by more than 150 nations including the U.S. It has been ratified by many nations and seeks to stabilize the concentration of GHG concentrations; however, it does not set binding emissions limitations. Nations are urged to adopt their

418

DOE STGWG Group  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

STGWG Group STGWG Group The State and Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) is one of the intergovernmental organizations with which the DOE EM office works with. They meet twice yearly for updates to the EM projects. They were formed in 1989. It is comprised of several state legislators and tribal staff and leadership from states in proximity to DOE's environmental cleanup sites of the following states: New York, South Carolina, Ohio, Washington, New Mexico, Idaho, California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, Nevada, Oregon, Tennessee and Texas. The tribal membership is composed of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, the Isleta Pueblo, Jemez Pueblo, Navajo Nation, Nez Perce Tribe, Santa Clara Pueblo, Pueblo de San Ildefonso, Seneca Nation of Indians, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the

419

DOE-MIRMISBWG  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FEE-13-1998 14:45 FEE-13-1998 14:45 . . - . DOE-MIRMISBWG 7 2 . r i-.1 I-' ? * \,, ? / :' , 2' .' 513 I365 4489 P. 02/11 .1??y 7 -- RADIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY OF FO,RMER MONSANTO FACILITIES (Unit III and Warehouse) DAYTON, OHIO Report Date: 4 September 1997 Survey Date: 27 Ahgust 1997 Prepared by: Mark L, Mays, Chief Radiation Safety Branch Sponsored by: Miamisburg Environmental Management Project Office Ohio Field Office U.S. Department of Energy Conducted by: Radiation Safety Branch Offke of Environmental Management ggth Air Base Wing U.S. Department of the Air Force In Cooperation With: Southwest District Office Ohio Environmental Protection Agency UaEKi Ohio Environmedal Protection Agency Bureau of Radiological Health Ohio Department of Health FEB-13-1998 14:46 DOE-MIFIMISBURG 513 865 4489 P.03111

420

DOE Federal Register Questions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMENTS-PAGE 1 COMMENTS-PAGE 1 Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration On May 11, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Request for Information (RFI) (NBP RFI: Communications Requirements) seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in understanding the communications requirement of utilities, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the Smart Grid. The RFI also seeks to collect information about electricity infrastructure's current and projected communications requirements, as well as the types of networks and communications services that may be used for grid modernization, including specifically information on what types of communications capabilities utilities think that they will need and what type of communications capabilities the communications carriers think that they can

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

DOE/SEA-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM 10 ). As a result of the study, on August 19, 2005, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) issued a letter to Mirant requesting that Mirant "undertake such action as is necessary to ensure protection of human health and the environment, in the area surrounding the Potomac River Generating Station, including the potential reduction of levels of operation, or potential shutdown of the facility." On August 24, 2005, in response to VDEQ's August 19, 2005, letter, Mirant decided to shut down all five generating units at the Plant. Figure S-1. The location of the Plant in relation to the central Washington, D.C. area. DOE/SEA-04 November 2006 S-3 DOE Action On August 24, 2005, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) filed an

422

DOE/SEA-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

μm in aerodynamic μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM 10 ). As a result of the study, on August 19, 2005, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) issued a letter to Mirant requesting that Mirant "undertake such action as is necessary to ensure protection of human health and the environment, in the area surrounding the Potomac River Generating Station, including the potential reduction of levels of operation, or potential shutdown of the facility." On August 24, 2005, in response to VDEQ's August 19, 2005, letter, Mirant decided to shut down all five generating units at the Plant. Figure S-1. The location of the Plant in relation to the central Washington, D.C. area. DOE/SEA-04 November 2006 S-3 DOE Action On August 24, 2005, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) filed an

423

BPA / Doe Memo Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-90) Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-90) David Byrnes TO: Fish and Wildlife Project Manager, KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Naches River Water Treatment Plant Intake Screening Project Project No: 2002-052-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 4.23 Intake and Return Diversion Screens, 9.23 Construction: Erosion and Sediment Control Structures. Location: Yakima, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the City of Yakima Description of the Proposed Action: BPA is proposing to fund the upgrade of the intake structure for the City of Yakima's Water Treatment Plant. The existing traveling water screen at

424

DOE Data Explorer  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DDE DDE Discovering data and non-text information in the Department of Energy DOE Data Explorer What's New About DDE DOE Data Centers OSTI's Data ID Service Featured Collection Featured Data Collection Visit CEDR View the archive Search Find Advanced Search Options × Full Text: Bibliographic Data: Creator/Author: Title: Subject: Identifier Numbers: Host Website: Research Org: Sponsor/Funding Org: Contributing Orgs: Type: Select Type Publication Date: from Date: to to Date: Sort: By Relevance By Title Limit to: Matches with DOI only Collections only (no DOIs) Clear Find Advanced Search Basic Search Browse DDE Content All Titles (alphabetically) Sponsor/Funding Organizations Types of Data and Non-text Other Related Organizations Subject Categories Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their

425

DOE Reg. Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 21, 2011 March 21, 2011 Page 1 March 21, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the Federal Register on February 3, 2011 requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. AHRI is the trade association representing manufacturers of heating, cooling, water heating, and commercial refrigeration equipment. More than 300 members strong, AHRI is an internationally recognized advocate for the industry, and develops standards for and certifies the performance of

426

DOE CONTRACTOR PENSION PLANS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-13 1-13 For use in M&O and non-M&O cost reimbursement solicitations and contracts where work had been previously performed under a DOE M&O contract and the successor Contractor is (a) required to employ all or part of the former Contractor's workforce and sponsors the employee pension and benefit plans; or (b) retains sponsorship of benefit plans that survive performance of the contract work scope. Contracts in this latter category include, but are not limited to, environmental remediation, infrastructure services and other site-specific project completion contracts. DOE-H-1002 EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION: PAY AND BENEFITS (a) Contractor Employee Compensation Plan The Contractor shall submit, for Contracting Officer approval, by (fill-in

427

DOE's Offices of Environmental  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement of Intent (SOI) Statement of Intent (SOI) between the US Dept of Energy (DOE) and the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) on decommissioning and waste management was renewed for a further five years during the Waste Management conference in Phoenix, AZ in March. The signatories to the SOI were the DOE's Offices of Environmental Management (EM) and Nuclear Energy (NE) and the NDA, with NE being a new addition to the arrangement. The Office of Environment Management is responsible for the clean-up of the former nuclear weapons' sites and the relationship between them and the NDA has already resulted in collaboration in a number of areas such as thermal treatments for stabilization of wastes, plutonium management, aging facilities management, non-standard fuels

428

DOE - Office of Legacy Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Services Calibration Facilities Ecosystem Management Team Environmental Justice Environmental Management System Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance Post-Closure Benefits Property Records Management Stakeholder Relations Sites Considered Sites LM Sites Sites Pending Transfer to LM Programmatic Framework Mission News About Us LM Sites Select a Site Acid/Pueblo Canyon Adrian Site Albany Site Aliquippa Site Ambrosia Lake Site Amchitka Site Ashtabula Site Bayo Canyon Site Berkeley Site Beverly Site Bluewater Site BONUS Site Buffalo Site Burrell Site Canonsburg Site CEER Sites Chariot Site Chicago North Site Chicago South Site Chupadera Mesa Site CNTA Site Colonie Site Columbus Sites Columbus

429

DOE F 5634  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 (09/2012) Replaces DOE F470.8 (05-05) All Other Editions are Obsolete U.S. Department of Energy SURVEY/INSPECTION REPORT FORM 1. Type: Survey: Initial Periodic Special Termination OA Reviews: NPR EPR Self-Assessment 2. Report #: 3. Facility Name: 4. a. Facility Code: b. RIS Code: 5. Survey Date(s): 6. a. Findings: Yes No b. Findings Against Other Facilities:

430

DOE/CF-0088  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Volume 5 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-0088 Volume 5 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Volume 5 Table of Contents Section Appropriation Account Summary .......................................................................................................................................... AP Appropriation Language .................................................................................................................................................... EM-1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................ EM-3

431

Natural phenomena hazards assessment criteria for DOE sites: DOE Standard DOE-STD-1023-95  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper summarizes hazard assessment criteria (DOE-STD-1023-95) for Natural Phenomena Hazards (NPH) at DOE sites. The DOE has established policy and requirements for NPH mitigation for DOE sites and facilities using a graded approach by DOE Order 5480.28. The graded approach is implemented by five performance categories established for structures, systems, and components (SSCs) at DOE facilities based on criteria provided by DOE-STD-1021-93. In applying the design/evaluation criteria of DOE-STD-1020-94 for DOE facilities subjected to one of the natural phenomena hazards, the establishment of design basis load levels consistent with the corresponding performance category is required. This standard provides general criteria as well as specific criteria for natural phenomena hazard assessments to ensure that adequate design basis load levels are established for design and/or evaluation of DOE facilities.

Chen, J.C.; Lu, S.C.; Boissonnade, A.C. [and others

1995-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

432

DOE F 740-MX  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Form 740M Form 740M (10-88) MANDATORY DATA COLLECTION AUTHORIZED BY 10 CFR 30, 40, 50, 70, 75, 150, Public Laws 83-703, 93-438, 95-91 OMB Control No. 1910-1800 4. REPORTING PERIOD 3. RIS 2. ATTACHMENT TO a. DOE/NRC 741 a. SHIPPER'S RIS b. RECEIVER'S RIS c. TRANS. NO. d. CORR NO. e. PC f. AC g. DATA CODE b. DOE/NRC 742 c. DOE/NRC 742c 5. TRANSACTION DATA 1. NAME 8a. LINE NO. 9. SIGNATURE (See instructions for provisions regarding confidentiality.) To the best of my knowledge and belief, the information given above and in any attached schedules is true, complete, and correct. 10. TITLE 11. DATE b. ENTRY REFERENCE c. TEXT OF CONCISE NOTE STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE FROM 6. REPORTING DATE 7. LICENSE NUMBERS TO Public Reporting Notice Disclosure on Back U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

433

DOE-HTGR-88111  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HTGR-88111 HTGR-88111 Revision 0 AUG 0 5 1991 . _ I . .....~ .. . . . . . - . . . . . . GRAPHITE DESIGN HANDBOOK AUTHORSICONTRACTORS GENERAL ATOMICS BUnON OF THIS DOCUMENT I S UNLlMmD ISSUED BY GENERAL ATOMICS FOR THE DEPARTMEW OF ENERGY CONTRACT DE-AC03-88SF17367 SEPTEMBER 1988 D 0 E- H TG R- 8 8 1 1 1 Revision 0 9 0 9 5 9 7 / 0 p b 7 ~ rJ T shall be made of c ~ c A R G D DOE Patent Coun 7 - 4 - S ( GRAPHITE DESIGN HANDBOOK DtSPRIBUflON OF THIS DOCUMENP I S UNLlMm Thle daoument is Issued By General Atomics P.O. Box 85608 San Diego, California 92138-5608 DOE CONTRACT DE-AC03-88SF17367 GA Project 6 3 0 0 SEPTEMBER 1988 RoU 2\66 GA 1 4 8 5 (REV 4/88) GENERAL ATOMICS IISCIPLINE SYSTEM 0 11 ISSUE SUMMARY DOC. TYPE PROJECT ISSUE NO./LTR. MAN 6300 DOE-HTGR-88111 0 l U A L l T Y ASSURANCE LEVEL N /A

434

DOE Energy Challenge Project  

SciTech Connect

Project Objectives: 1. Promote energy efficiency concepts in undergraduate and graduate education. 2. Stimulate and interest in pulp and paper industrial processes, which promote and encourage activities in the area of manufacturing design efficiency. 3. Attract both industrial and media attention. Background and executive Summary: In 1997, the Institute of Paper Science and Technology in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy developed a university design competition with an orientation to the Forest Products Industry. This university design competition is in direct alignment with DOEs interests in instilling in undergraduate education the concepts of developing energy efficient processes, minimizing waste, and providing environmental benefits and in maintaining and enhancing the economic competitiveness of the U.S. forest products industry in a global environment. The primary focus of the competition is projects, which are aligned with the existing DOE Agenda 2020 program for the industry and the lines of research being established with the colleges comprising the Pulp and Paper Education and Research Alliance (PPERA). The six design competitions were held annually for the period 1999 through 2004.

Frank Murray; Michael Schaepe

2009-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

435

DOE Roadmap: Chapter 3  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3. Human Radiation Experiments Associated With DOE and Its Predecessors 3. Human Radiation Experiments Associated With DOE and Its Predecessors Introduction This section contains a listing, description, and selected references for documented human radiation experiments sponsored, supported, or performed by the Department of Energy or its predecessors. The list represents work completed by the Office of Human Radiation Experiments through December 1994, and is a work in progress. Additional experiments will be added as they are identified, documented, and confirmed. The experiment list is available on the Internet and will be updated over time. This list includes experiments released at Secretary O'Leary's June 1994 press conference, as well as additional studies identified during the six months that followed. Cross-references are provided for experiments originally released at the press conference. Some of the 48 experiments released in June 1994 are not listed here, as continuing research is necessary. In the interest of assembling the most comprehensive information possible, a list of experiments described in the 1986 congressional report entitled American Nuclear Guinea Pigs: Three Decades of Radiation Experiments on U.S. Citizens is provided as an appendix. It should be noted that information about some studies in American Nuclear Guinea Pigs has been updated and included in the current DOE list; further update efforts are ongoing.

436

DOE Takes Steps to Fulfill Obligation Under the Energy Independence and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Takes Steps to Fulfill Obligation Under the Energy Independence Takes Steps to Fulfill Obligation Under the Energy Independence and Security Act DOE Takes Steps to Fulfill Obligation Under the Energy Independence and Security Act July 27, 2010 - 4:19pm Addthis Seeks Comments on the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Today, as required by Congress, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) soliciting comments from nuclear suppliers, nuclear insurance providers, and other stakeholders on the development of regulations to carry out section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), which implements the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC). The CSC provides for a world-wide approach to assure prompt and equitable compensation in the event of certain nuclear incidents, and features the

437

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For November 15 to December 1, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

15 to December 1, 2010 15 to December 1, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary

438

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Sept. 29 to Oct. 12, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

29 to Oct. 12, 2009 29 to Oct. 12, 2009 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project No incidents to report. Operational Summary

439

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For March 28 to April 24, 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

28 to April 24, 2012 28 to April 24, 2012 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Waste retrieval resumes at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project

440

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For September 12 to September 26, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 to September 26, 2011 2 to September 26, 2011 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For May 25 to June 14, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 to June 14, 2010 5 to June 14, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project No incidents to report. Operational Summary

442

Microsoft Word - Letter to DOE re Request for Information.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2012 8, 2012 Lamont Jackson Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Mail Code: OE-20 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Re: DOE Request for Information on Questions Related to Permitting of Transmission Lines, 77 Fed. Reg. 11517 (Feb. 27, 2012) Dear Mr. Jackson: I am writing in response to the above-referenced Department of Energy (DOE) Request for Information that was published in the Federal Register on February 27, 2012. WGA is currently engaged in an open and transparent stakeholder process to develop recommendations that will address the challenges of siting and permitting major transmission projects in the Western States. We will release a draft report for comment soon and we are sponsoring an

443

DOE to Host Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Natural Gas Subcommittee  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Host Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Natural Gas to Host Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Natural Gas Subcommittee Meeting DOE to Host Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Natural Gas Subcommittee Meeting May 27, 2011 - 12:00am Addthis Washington, DC - On Wednesday, June 1 and Thursday, June 2, 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy will host the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Natural Gas Subcommittee meeting. The meeting will allow subcommittee members to hear from key stakeholders as it works to identify immediate steps that can be taken to improve the safety and environmental performance of hydraulic fracturing. Media wishing to attend should contact Niketa Kumar at niketa.kumar@hq.doe.gov by 5pm on Tuesday, May 31. Requests received after 5pm on May 31 will be accommodated if possible. What: Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Natural Gas Subcommittee Meeting

444

DOE Science Showcase - Wind Power | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Science Showcase - Wind Power Science Showcase - Wind Power Wind Powering America is a nationwide initiative of the U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Program designed to educate, engage, and enable critical stakeholders to make informed decisions about how wind energy contributes to the U.S. electricity supply. Wind Power Research Results in DOE Databases IEA Wind Task 26: The Past and Future Cost of Wind Energy, Work Package 2, Energy Citations Database NREL Triples Previous Estimates of U.S. Wind Power Potential, Energy Citations Database Dynamic Models for Wind Turbines and Wind Power Plants, DOE Information Bridge 2012 ARPA-E Energy Innovation Summit: Profiling General Compression: A River of Wind, ScienceCinema, multimedia Solar and Wind Energy Resource Assessment (SWERA) Data from the

445

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Feb. 3 to Feb. 22, 2010*  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Feb. 3 to Feb. 22, 2010* Feb. 3 to Feb. 22, 2010* EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. * Because of a problem in collecting the data, this report includes three weeks worth of summaries, rather than the normal two.

446

DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For Feb. 22 to March 8, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

22 to March 8, 2010 22 to March 8, 2010 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a regular summary of operations at DOE's Idaho Site. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the laboratory. The report is broken down by contractor: Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This summary will be sent to everyone on INL's regular news release distribution list every other week. To be added to this distribution list, please call Brad Bugger at (208) 526-0833. * Because of a problem in collecting the data, this report includes three weeks worth of summaries, rather than the normal two.

447

DOE Takes Steps to Fulfill Obligation Under the Energy Independence and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Takes Steps to Fulfill Obligation Under the Energy Independence Takes Steps to Fulfill Obligation Under the Energy Independence and Security Act DOE Takes Steps to Fulfill Obligation Under the Energy Independence and Security Act July 27, 2010 - 4:19pm Addthis Seeks Comments on the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Today, as required by Congress, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) soliciting comments from nuclear suppliers, nuclear insurance providers, and other stakeholders on the development of regulations to carry out section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), which implements the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC). The CSC provides for a world-wide approach to assure prompt and equitable compensation in the event of certain nuclear incidents, and features the

448

DOE News Release - DOE Supports USPS Electric Vehicle Testing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

July 12, 2001 DOE Supports USPS Electric Vehicle Testing The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), through its Field Operations Program, is supporting the U.S. Postal Services' (USPS)...

449

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18, 2013 - 5:11pm Addthis WASHINGON, D. C. - After conducting a rigorous competitive selection process, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations, LLC (team includes members comprised of Parent Company Fluor Federal Services, Inc., of Arlington, Virginia and major subcontractors MRIGlobal of Kansas City, Missouri; Booz Allen Hamilton of Mclean, Virginia; and ASRC Petroleum Operations and Maintenance of Anchorage, Alaska) has been awarded a management and operating contract valued at $1.46 billion to run DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR)

450

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-10  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TECHNICAL STANDARDS TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM PROCEDURES DOE-TSPP-10 Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS TO NON-GOVERNMENT STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-10 Conversion Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1

451

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-6  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Date: July 1, 2009 COORDINATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 Coordination DOE-TSPP-6 Revision: 7 DOE Technical Standards Program Date: July 1, 2009 1 CONTENTS 1. SCOPE....................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Applicability .................................................................................................................1 2. DOCUMENT COORDINATION...............................................................................................1

452

DOE-TSPP-06; Coordination of DOE Technical Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Date: July 2004 COORDINATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-6 Coordination Revision: 6 Date: July 2004 DOE Technical Standards Program 2 CONTENTS 1. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Applicability ................................................................................................................. 3 2. DOCUMENT COORDINATION......................................................................................................3

453

DOE O 420 Briefing Slides  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Order (O) 420.1C Order (O) 420.1C Facility Safety Changes to DOE O 420 1C and Changes to DOE O 420.1C and Expectations for Effective Implementation Pranab Guha, HS-31 Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design February y 2013 1 Objectives Objectives  Obtain feedback and/or address issues or concerns concerns  Understand the history of DOE O 420.1  Understand the drivers for changes in DOE O Understand the drivers for changes in DOE O 420.1C  Understand the major differences between Understand the major differences between DOE O 420.1B and DOE O 420.1C  Understand DOE exp pectation for effective implementation 2 History of DOE Order 420 1 History of DOE Order 420.1  DOE Order 420.1 issued in October 1995 and combined the following DOE Orders:  DOE Order 6430.1A, General Design Criteria

454

USDA and DOE Partnership Seeks to Develop Better Plants for Bioenergy |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Partnership Seeks to Develop Better Plants for Partnership Seeks to Develop Better Plants for Bioenergy USDA and DOE Partnership Seeks to Develop Better Plants for Bioenergy September 2, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON, Sept. 2, 2010 -- Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today announced research awards under a joint DOE-USDA program aimed at improving and accelerating genetic breeding programs to create plants better suited for bioenergy production. The $8.9 million investment is part of the Obama Administration's broader effort to diversify the nation's energy portfolio and to accelerate the development of new energy technologies designed to decrease the nation's dependence on foreign oil. "Cost-effective, sustainable biofuels are crucial to building a clean energy economy," said Secretary Chu. "By harnessing the power of science

455

PNC/DOE Remote Monitoring Project at Japan`s Joyo Facility  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation (PNC) of Japan and the US Department of Energy (DOE) are cooperating on the development of a remote monitoring system for nuclear nonproliferation efforts. This cooperation is part of a broader safeguards agreement between PNC and DOE. A remote monitoring system is being installed in a spent fuel storage area at PNC`s experimental reactor facility Joyo in Oarai. The system has been designed by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) and is closely related to those used in other SNL remote monitoring projects. The Joyo project will particularly study the unique aspects of remote monitoring in contribution to nuclear nonproliferation. The project will also test and evaluate the fundamental design and implementation of the remote monitoring system in its application to regional and international safeguards efficiency. This paper will present a short history of the cooperation, the details of the monitoring system and a general schedule of activities.

Ross, M.; Hashimoto, Yu [Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corp., Oarai, Ibaraki (Japan). Oarai Engineering Center; Senzaki, Masao; Shigeto, Toshinori [Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corp., Tokyo (Japan); Sonnier, C. [Jupiter Corp., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Dupree, S.; Ystesund, K.; Hale, W. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States)

1996-07-25T23:59:59.000Z

456

DOE Matching Grant Program  

SciTech Connect

Funding used to support a portion of the Nuclear Engineering Educational Activities. Upgrade of teaching labs, student support to attend professional conferences, salary support for graduate students. The US Department of Energy (DOE) has funded Purdue University School of Nuclear Engineering during the period of five academic years covered in this report starting in the academic year 1996-97 and ending in the academic year 2000-2001. The total amount of funding for the grant received from DOE is $416K. In the 1990's, Nuclear Engineering Education in the US experienced a significant slow down. Student enrollment, research support, number of degrees at all levels (BS, MS, and PhD), number of accredited programs, University Research and Training Reactors, all went through a decline to alarmingly low levels. Several departments closed down, while some were amalgamated with other academic units (Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, etc). The School of Nuclear Engineering at Purdue University faced a major challenge when in the mid 90's our total undergraduate enrollment for the Sophomore, Junior and Senior Years dropped in the low 30's. The DOE Matching Grant program greatly strengthened Purdue's commitment to the Nuclear Engineering discipline and has helped to dramatically improve our undergraduate and graduate enrollment, attract new faculty and raise the School of Nuclear Engineering status within the University and in the National scene (our undergraduate enrollment has actually tripled and stands at an all time high of over 90 students; total enrollment currently exceeds 110 students). In this final technical report we outline and summarize how the grant was expended at Purdue University.

Tsoukalas, L.

2002-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

457

DOE/EIS-0284  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

B. CARBON SEQUESTRATION PROJECTS, INITIATIVES B. CARBON SEQUESTRATION PROJECTS, INITIATIVES AND TECHNOLOGIES This appendix provides details about existing and ongoing carbon sequestration research projects, initiatives and technologies. Although some of the projects and initiatives described here are being sponsored by DOE, the majority are sponsored by other government agencies, the private sector, or foreign governments. These descriptions are provided for both: * technologies that are in the very earliest stages of research, where deployment at the demonstration or commercial scale would not occur before 2012, and * existing and ongoing projects in the U.S and other countries, where the descriptions help exemplify the types and scales of research being conducted around the world.

458

DOE/CF-0084  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Volume 1 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-0084 Volume 1 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors

459

DOE/EA-  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EA-1605 EA-1605 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR BIOMASS COGENERATION AND HEATING FACILITIES AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE AUGUST 2008 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE DOE/EA-1605 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR BIOMASS COGENERATION AND HEATING FACILITIES AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE AUGUST 2008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE This page intentionally left blank - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Background and Proposed Action ...............................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................4

460

DOE F 5634  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 (09/2012) Replaces DOE F 470.2 (05-05) All Other Editions Are Obsolete U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FACILITY DATA AND APPROVAL RECORD (FDAR) 1. Facility Code: 2. Reason for Action: Awaiting Activation Add 3. Previous FDAR No: Date: 4. FDAR No: 5a. Facility Name: 5b. Doing Business As: 6. Acronym 7. Importance Rating: A Is this facility considered a Critical National Infrastructure? 8. Facility Type: 9. Facility Location: 10. Item Numbers Modified: 11. Unclassified Mailing Address: 12. Offices: a. Cognizant Security Agency: ________________ Agreement Date: ________ b. Program Secretarial Office: ________________ c. Cognizant Security Office: ________________ d. Designated Responsible Office: ________________

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

DOE/FE-0564  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Prepared by: U.S. Department of Energy Natural Gas Imports and Exports First Quarter Report 2013 LNG Trinidad and Tobago Canada Mexico Qatar Yemen NATURAL GAS IMPORTS AND EXPORTS FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2013 Office of Natural Gas Regulatory Activities Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy 202-586-9478 ngreports@hq.doe.gov Table of Contents Summary ......................................................................... 1 1 Quarterly Summary ...................................................... 3 Maps of Imports & Exports by Point of Entry/Exit ................................... 5 Tabular Summaries & Comparisons .................................................................. 11 1a Quarter in Review ...................................................................................................13

462

DOE Building Technologies Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Overview Overview September 2013 Buildings.energy.gov/BPD BuildingsPerformanceDatabase@ee.doe.gov 2 * The BPD statistically analyzes trends in the energy performance and physical & operational characteristics of real commercial and residential buildings. The Buildings Performance Database 3 Design Principles * The BPD contains actual data on existing buildings - not modeled data or anecdotal evidence. * The BPD enables statistical analysis without revealing information about individual buildings. * The BPD cleanses and validates data from many sources and translates it into a standard format. * In addition to the BPD's analysis tools, third parties will be able to create applications using the

463

DOE/CF-0089  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Volume 6 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 DOE/CF-0089 Volume 6 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration

464

space booklet_DOE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

U U C L E A R E N E R G Y DOE/NE-0071 U . S . D e p a r t m e n t o f E n e r g y O f f i c e o f N u c l e a r E n e r g y , S c i e n c e a n d T e c h n o l o g y N UCLEAR Power in Space 2

465

DOE F 5631  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(07/03) OFFICIAL USE ONLY OMB Control No. 1910-5122 (07/03) OFFICIAL USE ONLY OMB Control No. 1910-5122 Replaces DOE F 5631.35 A ll other editions obsolete. 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HUMAN RELIABILITY PROGRAM (HRP) CERTIFICATION NAME: INITIAL [ ] ANNUAL [ ] POSITION:_____________________________ DRUG TESTING DATE:___________________ EMPLOYER:___________________________ ALCOHOL TESTING DATE:_______________ ANNIVERSARY/DUE DATE:_____________ TRAINING COMPLETION DATE:__________ COUNTERINTELLIGENCE EVALUATION APPROVAL DATE: __________________________________ SECTION A - SUPERVISORY REVIEW I have reviewed all available information regarding this individual and have no reason to believe that this individual may represent a security or safety concern. (If you cannot make such an affirmation, then do not sign here and

466

DOE FUNDAMENTALS HANDBOOK  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Electrical Science Fundamentals Handbook was developed to assist nuclear facility operating contractors provide operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff with the necessary fundamentals training to ensure a basic understanding of electrical theory, terminology, and application. The handbook includes information on alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) theory, circuits, motors, and generators; AC power and reactive components; batteries; AC and DC voltage regulators; transformers; and electrical test instruments and measuring devices. This information will provide personnel with a foundation for understanding the basic operation of various types of DOE nuclear facility electrical equipment.

unknown authors

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

DOE O 451  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51.1B Chg 3 51.1B Chg 3 1-19-12 ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE TO DOE O 451.1B CHG 3, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM LOCATION OF CHANGES: Page Paragraph Changed To 1 footer [Update to reflect disestablishment of EH in October 2006] Delete: "Office of Environment, Safety and Health" Insert: "Office of the General Counsel" 2 4 [Insertion to reflect policy expressed in 2nd paragraph of Deputy Secretary's memorandum on "Public Involvement in the Environmental Assessment Process" (July 16, 2010)] Insert: "h. Opportunity,

468

DOE F 1325  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Department's Implementation The Department's Implementation of the "Energy Annex, Emergency Support Function 12" to the National Response Framework DOE/IG-0847 January 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 January 31, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report on The Department's Implementation of the "Energy Annex, Emergency Support Function 12" to the National Response Framework BACKGROUND As required by the National Response Framework (NRF), the Department of Energy, in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), plays an active role in responding to national-level disasters and emergencies. As described in the "Energy Annex,

469

DOE/EM-51  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SOURCE EVALUATION BOARD REPORT TEMPLATE SOURCE EVALUATION BOARD REPORT TEMPLATE JUNE 2010 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [ACQUISITION OFFICE NAME] [INITIAL/FINAL] SOURCE EVALUATION BOARD REPORT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NUMBER __________ [ACQUISITION TITLE] SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104 This report covers the [initial/final] evaluation by the Source Evaluation Board (SEB) for the: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) [ACQUISITION OFFICE NAME] [ACQUISITION TITLE] SOLICITATION NUMBER _________________ Distribution is limited to those on a need-to-know basis, and this report must be treated as "OFFICIAL USE ONLY." THIS REPORT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED. If transmitted by

470

THE ROLE OF LAND USE IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING AT THREE DOE MEGA-CLEANUP SITES FERNALD & ROCKY FLATS & MOUND  

SciTech Connect

This paper explores the role that future land use decisions have played in the establishment of cost-effective cleanup objectives and the setting of environmental media cleanup levels for the three major U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites for which cleanup has now been successfully completed: the Rocky Flats, Mound, and Fernald Closure Sites. At each site, there are distinct consensus-building histories throughout the following four phases: (1) the facility shut-down and site investigation phase, which took place at the completion of their Cold War nuclear-material production missions; (2) the decision-making phase, whereby stakeholder and regulatory-agency consensus was achieved for the future land-use-based environmental decisions confronting the sites; (3) the remedy selection phase, whereby appropriate remedial actions were identified to achieve the future land-use-based decisions; and (4) the implementation phase, whereby the selected remedial actions for these high-profile sites were implemented and successfully closed out. At each of the three projects, there were strained relationships and distrust between the local community and the DOE as a result of site contamination and potential health effects to the workers and local residents. To engage citizens and interested stakeholder groups - particularly in the role of final land use in the decision-making process, the site management teams at each respective site developed new public-participation strategies to open stakeholder communication channels with site leadership, technical staff, and the regulatory agencies. This action proved invaluable to the success of the projects and reaching consensus on appropriate levels of cleanup. With the implementation of the cleanup remedies now complete, each of the three DOE sites have become models for future environmental-remediation projects and associated decision making.

JEWETT MA

2011-01-14T23:59:59.000Z

471

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A TECHNICAL STANDARD U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-2 Need Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE...

472

DOE Challenge Home Label Methodology  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 2012 1 October 2012 1 Label Methodology DOE Challenge Home Label Methodology October 2012 DOE Challenge Home October 2012 2 Label Methodology Contents Background ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Comfort/Quiet .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Healthy Living ........................................................................................................................................... 7

473

DOE Federal Quality Council: Activities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Section B Crosswalk of DOE O 414.1D, ISO 9001, and NQA-1 - Task Planning Document (TPD) DOE QA Requirement Training Performance Metrics for QA Program Effectiveness (Note: For a...

474

DOE O 130.1, Budget Formulation  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

DOE N 251.45, dated 5/29/02, extends this directive until 5/1/03. Cancels DOE 5100.3, DOE 5100.4, DOE 5100.5, DOE 5100.6A.

1995-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

475

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bayo_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

in conjunction with cleanup activities for the entire Los Alamos site. Office of Legacy Management activities consist of managing site records and responding to stakeholder...

476

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Acid_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

in conjunction with cleanup activities for the entire Los Alamos site. Office of Legacy Management activities consist of managing site records and responding to stakeholder...

477

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gen_Atomics  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Office, California. After remediation, the site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2005. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For...

478

Gen IV Materials (ASME-DOE Project) - Programmaster.org  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... reactors, ASME Standards Technology, LLC (ASME ST-LLC) has been working with major stakeholders from industry, government, and academia to develop...

479

Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TECHNICAL STANDARDS TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM PROCEDURES DOE-TSPP-9 Revision: 5 Date: August 1, 2000 MAINTENANCE OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-9 Maintenance Revision: 5 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1

480

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS TO NON-GOVERNMENT STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-10 Conversion Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1 2. CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS.................................................................... 1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "broader doe stakeholder" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

DOE Patents Database - Inventor Resources  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Research and Small Business Technology Transfer Research DOE Technology Transfer EERE Technology Commercialization Portal EERE Advanced Manufacturing Office Related...

482

DOE Guidance-Category Rating  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This memorandum is to establish the Department of Energy's (DOE's) policy for the use of Category Rating.

483

DOE Plans | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management Certifications and Professional Development Real Estate History DOE Strategic Plans Strategic Plan for the Department of Energy Environmental Restoration...

484

DOE Patents Database - Site Index  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Site Index Home Advanced Search About Patent News Recent Inventions Technology Transfer Resources DOE Innovations FAQ Help RSS Contact Us...