Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Prime Supplier Report  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Report Report September 2013 Prime Supplier Report Released: November 26, 2013 Next Update: December 23, 2013 Legend: Petroleum Data Tables Petroleum Data Tables HTML File HTML File PDF File PDF File The Prime Supplier Report presents data collected on Form EIA-782C, "Monthly Report of Prime Supplier Sales of Petroleum Products Sold for Local Consumption." These data measure primary petroleum product deliveries into the States where they are locally marketed and consumed. Petroleum Data Tables HTML File PDF File --- Prime Supplier Sales Volumes in Petroleum Navigator, HTML, and PDF formats. Previous --- Previous reports are available on the historical page. The EIA-782C respondent frame is comprised of approximately 195 prime suppliers representing producers, importers, and inter-State resellers and

2

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

YTD '09: -8.7% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report September 2009 Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, September 2009 2 Measurement of...

3

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to YTD '09: -10.6% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report August 2009 Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, August 2009 2 Measurement of...

4

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to YTD '09: -11.4% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report July 2009 Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, July 2009 2 Measurement of Petroleum...

5

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

'08 to YTD '09: -14.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report May 2009 Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, May 2009 2 Measurement of Petroleum...

6

Prime Supplier Report Historical - U.S. Energy Information ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Prime Supplier Report Historical. Monthly Report of Prime Supplier Sales of Petroleum Products Sold for Local Consumption. These data measure primary petroleum ...

7

U.S. Energy Information Administration/Prime Supplier Report...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

1.0% Jul '12 to Jul '13: 5.4% YTD '12 to YTD '13: 21.2% Prime Supplier Report July 2013 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, July 2013 Measurement of...

8

Energy Information Administration/Prime Supplier Report, 1  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oct '10 to Oct '11: 13.8% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -1.1% Prime Supplier Report October 2011 Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, 2 October 2011 Energy Information...

9

Table 45. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Table 45. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by Grade, Formulation, PAD District, and State (Thousand Gallons per Day) Continued

10

Table 45. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

U.S. Energy Information Administration/Petroleum Marketing Monthly February 2012 136 Table 45. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by Grade, Formulation,

11

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products by Grade,...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products by Grade, PAD District, and State (Thousand Gallons) Geographic Area Products June 1998 July 1998 August 1998 September 1998...

12

Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Marketing Annual 1998 Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane, and Residual Fuel Oil by PAD District and State (Thousand Gallons per Day) -...

13

Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Marketing Annual 1999 Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane, and Residual Fuel Oil by PAD District and State (Thousand Gallons per Day) -...

14

Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

See footnotes at end of table. 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane, and Residual Fuel Oil by PAD District and State 386 Energy Information...

15

Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane, and Residual Fuel Oil by PAD District and State (Thousand Gallons per Day) Geographic Area

16

Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Marketing Annual 1995 Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane, and Residual Fuel Oil by PAD District and State (Thousand Gallons per Day) -...

17

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jul '10 to Jul '11: +1.9% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -3.4% * Calculated on a per day basis. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, July 2011 2 Measurement of Petroleum...

18

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jun '10 to Jun '11: +0.1% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -3.7% * Calculated on a per day basis. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, June 2011 2 Measurement of Petroleum...

19

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May '10 to May '11: +4.9% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -5.0% * Calculated on a per day basis. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, May 2011 2 Measurement of Petroleum...

20

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Aug '10 to Aug '11: 3.2% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -2.8% * Calculated on a per day basis. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, August 2011 2 Measurement of...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

U.S. Total Gasoline All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

U.S. Total Gasoline All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier (Thousand Gallons per Day) ... Prime Supplier Sales of Motor Gasoline ; U.S. Prices, ...

22

Table 48. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

- - 532.1 532.1 See footnotes at end of table. 48. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by Grade, Formulation, PAD District, and State 356 Energy Information...

23

California Total Gasoline All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

California Total Gasoline All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier (Thousand Gallons per Day) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9;

24

Texas Total Gasoline All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Texas Total Gasoline All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier (Thousand Gallons per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec; 1983: 26,179.1: 26,695.0 ...

25

Table 50. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Distillate Fuel Oils...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

50. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Distillate Fuel Oils and Kerosene by PAD District and State (Thousand Gallons per Day) Geographic Area Month Kerosene No. 1 Distillate No. 2...

26

Colorado Total Gasoline All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Colorado Total Gasoline All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier (Thousand Gallons per Day) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9;

27

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Supplier Report, March 2011 2 Measurement of Petroleum Product Sales Volumes on the EIA-782C Data for the Prime Supplier Report are collected on Form EIA-782C, "Monthly...

28

Energy Information Administration/Prime Supplier Report, 1  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Prime Supplier Report, 1 Prime Supplier Report, 1 October 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan. '99 to Feb. '99: -1.7% Feb. '98 to Feb. '99: +19.8% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +15.0% 4,100 4,400 4,700 5,000 5,300 5,600 5,900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 2009 2010 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '11 to Oct '11: 2.9% Oct '10 to Oct '11: 2.4% YTD '10 to YTD '11: 0.3% 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 2009 2010 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '11 to Oct '11: 11.7% Oct '10 to Oct '11: -1.7% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -12.6% 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 2009 2010 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates*

29

Table 46. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, No. 4 ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

U.S. Energy Information Administration/Petroleum Marketing Monthly February 2012 144 Table 46. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, No. 4 Fuel Oil, Propane,

30

EIA-782C MONTHLY REPORT OF PRIME SUPPLIER SALES OF PETROLEUM ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782C, "Monthly Report of Prime Supplier Sales of Petroleum Products Sold for Local

31

U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier (Thousand Gallons per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec; 1983: 30,535.1 ...

32

Prime Supplier Sales of Motor Gasoline - U.S. Energy ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

-No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Retail prices and Prime ...

33

Prime Supplier Sales of Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

-No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Retail prices and Prime ...

34

,"U.S. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products" Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Motor Gasoline by Grade and Formulation",13,"Monthly","9/2013","1/15/1983" ,"Data 2","Motor Gasoline by Formulation",3,"Monthly","9/2013","10/15/1993" ,"Data 3","Other Products",17,"Monthly","9/2013","1/15/1983" ,"Release Date:","11/26/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","12/23/2013" ,"Excel File Name:","pet_cons_prim_dcu_nus_m.xls"

35

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Sep Sep '01 to Oct '01: +3.2% Oct '00 to Oct '01: +3.1% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +1.7% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '01 to Oct '01: +8.7% Oct '00 to Oct '01: +2.6% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +4.1% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '01 to Oct '01: -1.9% Oct '00 to Oct '01: -12.0% YTD '00 to YTD '01: -0.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '01 to Oct '01: +16.2% Oct '00 to Oct '01: +9.7% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +6.2% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report October 2001 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000

36

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar Mar '04 to Apr '04: +1.7% Apr '03 to Apr '04: +3.4% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +2.2% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* M ar '04 to Apr '04: -2.0% Apr '03 to Apr '04: +5.5% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +1.7% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '04 to Apr '04: +5.2% Apr '03 to Apr '04: +15.0% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +5.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '04 to Apr '04: -22.8% Apr '03 to Apr '04: -0.7% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +3.1% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report April 2004 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900

37

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May May '02 to Jun '02: +0.0% Jun '01 to Jun '02: +2.4% YTD '01 to YTD '02: +3.6% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* M ay '02 to Jun '02: -4.0% Jun '01 to Jun '02: -2.1% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -6.1% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '02 to Jun '02: +3.6% Jun '01 to Jun '02: -5.3% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -4.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '02 to Jun '02: +6.6% Jun '01 to Jun '02: +8.0% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -2.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report June 2002 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100

38

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Feb Feb '03 to Mar '03: +0.7% Mar '02 to Mar '03: -2.0% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -1.7% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '03 to M ar '03: -8.4% M ar '02 to M ar '03: +6.3% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +7.7% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '03 to Mar '03: -1.8% Mar '02 to Mar '03: -10.2% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -5.3% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '03 to Mar '03: -30.2% Mar '02 to Mar '03: -12.1% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +3.7% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report March 2003 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800

39

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jul Jul '02 to Aug '02: +1.2% Aug '01 to Aug '02: +1.6% YTD '01 to YTD '02: +2.9% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '02 to Aug '02: +1.8% Aug '01 to Aug '02: -4.5% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -5.7% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '02 to Aug '02: -4.6% Aug '01 to Aug '02: -9.4% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -5.0% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '02 to Aug '02: +8.7% Aug '01 to Aug '02: -12.5% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -4.7% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report August 2002 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000

40

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May May '03 to Jun '03: +1.2% Jun '02 to Jun '03: -0.2% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -1.6% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* M ay '03 to Jun '03: +0.6% Jun '02 to Jun '03: +2.7% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +4.3% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '03 to Jun '03: +5.1% Jun '02 to Jun '03: -6.7% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -7.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '03 to Jun '03: +11.9% Jun '02 to Jun '03: -12.7% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -2.3% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report June 2003 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

X:\L6046\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Sep Sep '05 to Oct '05: +0.3% Oct '04 to Oct '05: +0.4% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +2.3% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '05 to Oct '05: -1.9% Oct '04 to Oct '05: +0.3% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +1.6% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '05 to Oct '05: -4.4% Oct '04 to Oct '05: +0.9% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +3.8% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '05 to Oct '05: +7.5% Oct '04 to Oct '05: -5.9% YTD '04 to YTD '05: -4.8% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report October 2005 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800

42

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Feb Feb '05 to Mar '05: +2.8% Mar '04 to Mar '05: +3.3% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +3.0% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '05 to M ar '05: +3.2% M ar '04 to M ar '05: +4.3% YTD '04 to YTD '05: -0.2% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '05 to Mar '05: +0.6% Mar '04 to Mar '05: +3.2% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +2.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '05 to Mar '05: -14.9% Mar '04 to Mar '05: +5.3% YTD '04 to YTD '05: -5.7% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report March 2005 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800

43

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oct Oct '01 to Nov '01: -1.5% Nov '00 to Nov '01: +2.0% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +1.7% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '01 to Nov '01: -3.4% Nov '00 to Nov '01: +0.8% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +3.8% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '01 to Nov '01: +11.1% Nov '00 to Nov '01: -2.9% YTD '00 to YTD '01: -0.3% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '01 to Nov '01: -0.8% Nov '00 to Nov '01: -4.5% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +5.1% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report November 2001 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000

44

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr Apr '04 to May '04: +0.5% May '03 to May '04: -0.5% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +1.6% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '04 to M ay '04: -7.9% M ay '03 to M ay '04: +2.2% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +1.8% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '04 to May '04: -5.1% May '03 to May '04: +8.1% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +6.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '04 to May '04: -13.3% May '03 to May '04: +10.6% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +4.0% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report May 2004 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800

45

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar Mar '03 to Apr '03: +2.8% Apr '02 to Apr '03: -3.0% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -2.1% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* M ar '03 to Apr '03: -1.6% Apr '02 to Apr '03: +1.5% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +6.1% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '03 to Apr '03: -4.0% Apr '02 to Apr '03: -11.6% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -6.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '03 to Apr '03: -17.0% Apr '02 to Apr '03: -6.2% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +1.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report April 2003 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900

46

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jun Jun '02 to Jul '02: +0.2% Jul '01 to Jul '02: +3.7% YTD '01 to YTD '02: +3.7% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '02 to Jul '02: -0.1% Jul '01 to Jul '02: +1.0% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -5.1% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '02 to Jul '02: +6.6% Jul '01 to Jul '02: -1.0% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '02 to Jul '02: -9.8% Jul '01 to Jul '02: -11.5% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.8% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report July 2002 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000

47

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nov Nov '03 to Dec '03: +1.5% Dec '02 to Dec '03: +1.5% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -0.2% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '03 to Dec '03: +8.0% Dec '02 to Dec '03: +3.4% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +3.4% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '03 to Dec '03: +2.8% Dec '02 to Dec '03: -6.0% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -8.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '03 to Dec '03: +38.3% Dec '02 to Dec '03: -0.5% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -0.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report December 2003 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800

48

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oct Oct '02 to Nov '02: -2.3% Nov '01 to Nov '02: +0.8% YTD '01 to YTD '02: +2.5% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '02 to Nov '02: -3.8% Nov '01 to Nov '02: -1.6% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -4.6% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '02 to Nov '02: -2.4% Nov '01 to Nov '02: -1.5% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -2.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '02 to Nov '02: +7.2% Nov '01 to Nov '02: +2.3% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -4.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report November 2002 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000

49

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dec Dec '01 to Jan '02: -3.2% Jan '01 to Jan '02: +5.0% YTD '01 to YTD '02: +5.0% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '01 to Jan '02: +9.3% Jan '01 to Jan '02: -10.4% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -10.4% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '01 to Jan '02: -5.2% Jan '01 to Jan '02: -7.9% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -7.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '01 to Jan '02: +9.6% Jan '01 to Jan '02: -11.0% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -11.0% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report January 2002 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900

50

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Aug Aug '02 to Sep '02: -6.8% Sep '01 to Sep '02: +1.9% YTD '01 to YTD '02: +2.8% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '02 to Sep '02: -2.0% Sep '01 to Sep '02: -3.2% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -5.3% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '02 to Sep '02: -0.5% Sep '01 to Sep '02: +10.8% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '02 to Sep '02: +5.0% Sep '01 to Sep '02: -14.9% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -5.8% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report September 2002 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900

51

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nov Nov '01 to Dec '01: -0.8% Dec '00 to Dec '01: +0.2% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +1.6% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '01 to Dec '01: -4.5% Dec '00 to Dec '01: -11.7% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +2.4% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '01 to Dec '01: -2.9% Dec '00 to Dec '01: -6.7% YTD '00 to YTD '01: -0.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '01 to Dec '01: +16.7% Dec '00 to Dec '01: -19.1% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +1.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report December 2001 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900

52

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar Mar '05 to Apr '05: +0.2% Apr '04 to Apr '05: +1.8% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +2.7% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* M ar '05 to Apr '05: -9.6% Apr '04 to Apr '05: -3.3% YTD '04 to YTD '05: -0.9% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '05 to Apr '05: +1.4% Apr '04 to Apr '05: -0.5% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +1.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '05 to Apr '05: -32.2% Apr '04 to Apr '05: -6.5% YTD '04 to YTD '05: -5.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report April 2005 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800

53

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jul Jul '03 to Aug '03: +0.3% Aug '02 to Aug '03: +0.3% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -0.9% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '03 to Aug '03: -2.2% Aug '02 to Aug '03: -1.3% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +3.6% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '03 to Aug '03: +0.8% Aug '02 to Aug '03: -7.7% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -7.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '03 to Aug '03: +3.7% Aug '02 to Aug '03: -3.2% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -0.6% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report August 2003 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900

54

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr Apr '03 to May '03: +4.2% May '02 to May '03: -0.9% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -1.9% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '03 to M ay '03: -5.5% M ay '02 to M ay '03: -1.6% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +4.5% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '03 to May '03: +0.2% May '02 to May '03: -9.1% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -7.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '03 to May '03: -21.5% May '02 to May '03: -15.2% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -0.5% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report May 2003 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900

55

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Aug Aug '03 to Sep '03: -4.1% Sep '02 to Sep '03: +3.4% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -0.5% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '03 to Sep '03: +6.6% Sep '02 to Sep '03: +7.6% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +4.1% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '03 to Sep '03: +0.9% Sep '02 to Sep '03: -6.1% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -7.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '03 to Sep '03: +19.6% Sep '02 to Sep '03: +10.6% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +0.5% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report September 2003 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700

56

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jun Jun '01 to Jul '01: -0.5% Jul '00 to Jul '01: +1.8% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +1.7% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '01 to Jul '01: -2.5% Jul '00 to Jul '01: +2.9% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +5.9% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '01 to Jul '01: +2.0% Jul '00 to Jul '01: +1.5% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +3.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '01 to Jul '01: +10.3% Jul '00 to Jul '01: +15.7% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +7.5% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report July 2001 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000

57

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oct Oct '03 to Nov '03: -4.5% Nov '02 to Nov '03: -1.0% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -0.3% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '03 to Nov '03: -10.0% Nov '02 to Nov '03: -3.4% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +3.4% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '03 to Nov '03: -3.0% Nov '02 to Nov '03: -10.9% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -8.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '03 to Nov '03: -1.7% Nov '02 to Nov '03: -10.3% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -0.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report November 2003 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700

58

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May May '05 to Jun '05: +2.2% Jun '04 to Jun '05: +3.8% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +3.2% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* M ay '05 to Jun '05: +1.8% Jun '04 to Jun '05: +1.6% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +0.5% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '05 to Jun '05: +5.7% Jun '04 to Jun '05: +2.5% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +1.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '05 to Jun '05: +7.2% Jun '04 to Jun '05: -10.0% YTD '04 to YTD '05: -6.7% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report June 2005 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800

59

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dec Dec '04 to Jan '05: -8.2% Jan '04 to Jan '05: +1.1% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +1.1% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '04 to Jan '05: -1.7% Jan '04 to Jan '05: -5.2% YTD '04 to YTD '05: -5.2% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '04 to Jan '05: -5.1% Jan '04 to Jan '05: -0.3% YTD '04 to YTD '05: -0.3% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '04 to Jan '05: -3.1% Jan '04 to Jan '05: -12.1% YTD '04 to YTD '05: -12.1% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report January 2005 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700

60

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jul Jul '04 to Aug '04: -0.1% Aug '03 to Aug '04: -1.2% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +0.5% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '04 to Aug '04: +2.3% Aug '03 to Aug '04: +5.2% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +2.2% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '04 to Aug '04: +3.8% Aug '03 to Aug '04: +9.4% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '04 to Aug '04: +4.7% Aug '03 to Aug '04: +3.8% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +5.5% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report August 2004 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Aug Aug '01 to Sep '01: -6.7% Sep '00 to Sep '01: +0.0% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +1.5% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '01 to Sep '01: -2.0% Sep '00 to Sep '01: -0.7% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +4.3% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '01 to Sep '01: -18.2% Sep '00 to Sep '01: -14.5% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +1.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1999 2000 2001 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '01 to Sep '01: +9.2% Sep '00 to Sep '01: +1.9% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +5.8% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report September 2001 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900

62

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar Mar '02 to Apr '02: +3.1% Apr '01 to Apr '02: +3.3% YTD '01 to YTD '02: +3.5% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* M ar '02 to Apr '02: +2.0% Apr '01 to Apr '02: -4.3% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -8.3% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '02 to Apr '02: -1.9% Apr '01 to Apr '02: -0.2% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -2.8% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '02 to Apr '02: -22.3% Apr '01 to Apr '02: +9.9% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -5.0% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report April 2002 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000

63

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jan Jan '03 to Feb '03: +1.1% Feb '02 to Feb '03: -2.8% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -1.5% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan '03 to Feb '03: -2.9% Feb '02 to Feb '03: +7.1% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +7.3% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan '03 to Feb '03: +4.6% Feb '02 to Feb '03: -3.8% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -2.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan '03 to Feb '03: -10.7% Feb '02 to Feb '03: +16.0% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +10.7% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report February 2003 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700

64

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jun Jun '04 to Jul '04: +0.6% Jul '03 to Jul '04: -0.9% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +0.7% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '04 to Jul '04: -4.8% Jul '03 to Jul '04: +0.2% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +1.8% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '04 to Jul '04: -3.1% Jul '03 to Jul '04: +6.5% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.6% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '04 to Jul '04: +0.6% Jul '03 to Jul '04: +3.6% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +5.7% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report July 2004 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900

65

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr Apr '02 to May '02: +1.9% May '01 to May '02: +4.9% YTD '01 to YTD '02: +3.9% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '02 to M ay '02: -2.2% M ay '01 to M ay '02: -0.5% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -6.7% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '02 to May '02: -3.6% May '01 to May '02: -7.7% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '02 to May '02: -8.3% May '01 to May '02: +5.8% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.5% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report May 2002 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100

66

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nov Nov '04 to Dec '04: +3.0% Dec '03 to Dec '04: +3.3% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +0.6% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '04 to Dec '04: +4.3% Dec '03 to Dec '04: +3.3% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +2.2% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '04 to Dec '04: -0.9% Dec '03 to Dec '04: +4.1% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.3% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '04 to Dec '04: +24.2% Dec '03 to Dec '04: +4.2% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +5.1% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report December 2004 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700

67

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Feb Feb '04 to Mar '04: +4.1% Mar '03 to Mar '04: +4.4% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +1.8% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '04 to M ar '04: -0.4% M ar '03 to M ar '04: +5.6% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +0.6% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '04 to Mar '04: +1.9% Mar '03 to Mar '04: +4.0% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +2.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '04 to Mar '04: -23.5% Mar '03 to Mar '04: +10.6% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +4.7% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report March 2004 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900

68

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jan Jan '04 to Feb '04: +2.2% Feb '03 to Feb '04: +1.1% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +0.6% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan '04 to Feb '04: -3.4% Feb '03 to Feb '04: -3.3% YTD '03 to YTD '04: -1.9% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan '04 to Feb '04: +2.1% Feb '03 to Feb '04: +1.0% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +2.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan '04 to Feb '04: -12.1% Feb '03 to Feb '04: +2.8% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +3.4% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report February 2004 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800

69

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oct Oct '04 to Nov '04: -0.6% Nov '03 to Nov '04: +1.6% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +0.3% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '04 to Nov '04: -0.7% Nov '03 to Nov '04: +6.7% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +2.1% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '04 to Nov '04: -0.1% Nov '03 to Nov '04: +7.1% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.6% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '04 to Nov '04: +14.7% Nov '03 to Nov '04: +16.4% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +5.3% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report November 2004 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700

70

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Feb Feb '02 to Mar '02: +0.2% Mar '01 to Mar '02: +2.1% YTD '01 to YTD '02: +3.6% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '02 to M ar '02: -5.3% M ar '01 to M ar '02: -11.1% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -9.3% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '02 to Mar '02: +5.0% Mar '01 to Mar '02: -0.7% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '02 to Mar '02: -8.2% Mar '01 to Mar '02: -4.4% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -7.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report March 2002 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000

71

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Sep Sep '03 to Oct '03: +1.3% Oct '02 to Oct '03: +1.4% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -0.3% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '03 to Oct '03: +6.3% Oct '02 to Oct '03: +3.8% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +4.0% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '03 to Oct '03: -5.5% Oct '02 to Oct '03: -11.2% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -8.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '03 to Oct '03: +13.3% Oct '02 to Oct '03: -2.3% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +0.2% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report October 2003 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800

72

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nov Nov '02 to Dec '02: -0.8% Dec '01 to Dec '02: +0.5% YTD '01 to YTD '02: +2.4% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '02 to Dec '02: +1.8% Dec '01 to Dec '02: +5.4% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.8% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '02 to Dec '02: -3.6% Dec '01 to Dec '02: -2.2% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -2.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Nov '02 to Dec '02: +24.7% Dec '01 to Dec '02: +9.3% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.4% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report December 2002 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000

73

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Sep Sep '04 to Oct '04: -0.8% Oct '03 to Oct '04: -1.9% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +0.2% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '04 to Oct '04: +0.4% Oct '03 to Oct '04: -3.3% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +1.7% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '04 to Oct '04: -2.0% Oct '03 to Oct '04: +8.4% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Sep '04 to Oct '04: +15.4% Oct '03 to Oct '04: -0.3% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +4.1% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report October 2004 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700

74

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jan Jan '02 to Feb '02: +4.0% Feb '01 to Feb '02: +4.3% YTD '01 to YTD '02: +4.6% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan '02 to Feb '02: -1.8% Feb '01 to Feb '02: -5.5% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -8.1% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan '02 to Feb '02: +7.3% Feb '01 to Feb '02: -2.6% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -5.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2000 2001 2002 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan '02 to Feb '02: -17.6% Feb '01 to Feb '02: -6.6% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -9.2% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report February 2002 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000

75

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dec Dec '03 to Jan '04: -6.2% Jan '03 to Jan '04: -0.4% YTD '03 to YTD '04: -0.4% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '03 to Jan '04: +6.2% Jan '03 to Jan '04: -1.5% YTD '03 to YTD '04: -1.5% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '03 to Jan '04: -1.8% Jan '03 to Jan '04: +0.9% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +0.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '03 to Jan '04: +11.2% Jan '03 to Jan '04: +1.2% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +1.2% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report January 2004 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800

76

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dec Dec '02 to Jan '03: -3.6% Jan '02 to Jan '03: +0.2% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +0.2% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '02 to Jan '03: +11.4% Jan '02 to Jan '03: +7.9% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +7.9% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '02 to Jan '03: -5.3% Jan '02 to Jan '03: -1.2% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -1.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2001 2002 2003 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '02 to Jan '03: +6.5% Jan '02 to Jan '03: +3.6% YTD '02 to YTD '03: +3.6% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report January 2003 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 600 700 800 900 1,000

77

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Aug Aug '04 to Sep '04: -2.5% Sep '03 to Sep '04: +0.0% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +0.4% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '04 to Sep '04: +4.5% Sep '03 to Sep '04: +2.3% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +2.2% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '04 to Sep '04: -2.4% Sep '03 to Sep '04: +5.7% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.6% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2002 2003 2004 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '04 to Sep '04: +7.4% Sep '03 to Sep '04: -6.6% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +4.2% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report September 2004 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700

78

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr Apr '05 to May '05: +1.8% May '04 to May '05: +3.4% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +2.8% U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 4,000 4,300 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '05 to M ay '05: -0.3% M ay '04 to M ay '05: +5.7% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +0.3% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '05 to May '05: -1.0% May '04 to May '05: +3.7% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +1.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2003 2004 2005 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '05 to May '05: -13.7% May '04 to May '05: -7.7% YTD '04 to YTD '05: -6.3% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report May 2005 U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900

79

U.S. Energy Information Administration/Prime Supplier Report, March 2013  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Administration/Prime Supplier Report, March 2013 Administration/Prime Supplier Report, March 2013 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan. '99 to Feb. '99: -1.7% Feb. '98 to Feb. '99: +19.8% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +15.0% 4,100 4,400 4,700 5,000 5,300 5,600 5,900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 2011 2012 2013 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '13 to Jul '13: 0.2% Jul '12 to Jul '13: 1.9% YTD '12 to YTD '13: 2.0% 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 2011 2012 2013 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '13 to Jul '13: 8.3% Jul '12 to Jul '13: -10.2% YTD '12 to YTD '13: -8.6% 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

80

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr '11 to May '11: -1.7% Apr '11 to May '11: -1.7% May '10 to May '11: -0.8% YTD '10 to YTD '11: +0.7% 1,800 1,900 2,000 allons U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales Adjusted Growth Rates* 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 2009 2010 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '11 to May '11: -0.1% May '10 to May '11: -5.1% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -3.0% Prime Supplier Report May 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan. '99 to Feb. '99: -1.7% Feb. '98 to Feb. '99: +19.8% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +15.0% 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 2009 2010 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '11 to May '11: -2.5% May '10 to May '11: -19.2% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -11.1% 1,400

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May '11 to Jun '11: +5.1% May '11 to Jun '11: +5.1% Jun '10 to Jun '11: -0.7% YTD '10 to YTD '11: +0.4% 1,800 1,900 2,000 Gallons U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales Adjusted Growth Rates* 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 2009 2010 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '11 to Jun '11: +2.9% Jun '10 to Jun '11: -4.3% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -3.2% Prime Supplier Report June 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan. '99 to Feb. '99: -1.7% Feb. '98 to Feb. '99: +19.8% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +15.0% 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 2009 2010 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '11 to Jun '11: +8.4% Jun '10 to Jun '11: -8.1% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -10.7% 1,400

82

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jul '11 to Aug '11: 8.4% Jul '11 to Aug '11: 8.4% Aug '10 to Aug '11: 2.4% YTD '10 to YTD '11: 0.2% 1 700 1,800 1,900 2,000 f Gallons U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales Adjusted Growth Rates* J l '11 t A '11 1 9% 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 2009 2010 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '11 to Aug '11: 2.9% Aug '10 to Aug '11: -2.5% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -3.5% Prime Supplier Report August 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan. '99 to Feb. '99: -1.7% Feb. '98 to Feb. '99: +19.8% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +15.0% 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 2009 2010 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '11 to Aug '11: -13.9% Aug '10 to Aug '11: -26.9% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -13.7%

83

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jun '11 to Jul '11: -6.9% Jun '11 to Jul '11: -6.9% Jul '10 to Jul '11: -3.0% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -0.0% 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 of Gallons U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '11 to Jul '11: -2.2% 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 2009 2010 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '11 to Jul '11: -1.1% Jul '10 to Jul '11: -5.6% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -3.6% Prime Supplier Report July 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jan. '99 to Feb. '99: -1.7% Feb. '98 to Feb. '99: +19.8% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +15.0% 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 2009 2010 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '11 to Jul '11: -11.8% Jul '10 to Jul '11: -19.8%

84

Prime Supplier Sales of No. 4 Fuel Oil - U.S. Energy ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

-No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Retail prices and Prime ...

85

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

43,846.3 43,846.3 12,393.4 68,635.1 224,874.7 21,109.7 1,971.5 13,674.3 36,755.5 February ................................. 156,170.6 13,007.4 73,407.9 242,585.9 22,564.3 1,908.0 14,502.1 38,974.4 March ...................................... 165,609.8 10,734.4 75,581.8 251,926.0 23,380.4 1,710.6 14,702.1 39,793.1 April ........................................ 177,434.0 7,401.2 78,075.3 262,910.4 23,176.8 1,110.5 13,692.0 37,979.3 May ......................................... 174,708.3 7,068.3 80,019.0 261,795.6 23,132.0 1,104.4 14,390.1 38,626.5 June ........................................ 180,115.7 7,743.1 82,880.6 270,739.4 23,655.7 1,206.1 14,792.7 39,654.5 July ......................................... 180,612.4 7,571.9 82,769.1 270,953.3 23,780.4 1,164.4 14,979.1 39,923.9 August ....................................

86

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1 1 Oxygenated Reformulated Total Conventional Oxygenated Reformulated Total United States January ................................... 146,590.5 11,788.1 73,965.0 232,343.6 17,670.2 1,837.6 12,128.0 31,635.9 February ................................. 165,557.6 12,617.2 81,634.7 259,809.5 19,814.7 1,826.9 13,320.1 34,961.7 March ...................................... 174,538.0 10,254.9 86,250.1 271,043.0 18,683.5 1,353.6 12,352.3 32,389.4 April ........................................ 175,968.6 8,437.6 86,667.7 271,073.9 18,586.7 1,233.1 12,289.6 32,109.4 May ......................................... 186,155.2 8,456.3 87,548.4 282,159.9 19,801.8 1,235.1 12,873.4 33,910.2 June ........................................ 191,350.9 8,838.3 90,774.7 290,963.9 19,221.5 1,211.3 12,915.6 33,348.4

87

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

61,490.1 61,490.1 12,691.6 83,592.9 257,774.6 16,699.1 1,879.7 11,386.7 29,965.5 February ................................. 169,479.2 12,905.4 87,740.9 270,125.5 17,936.4 1,875.0 11,803.9 31,615.3 March ...................................... 176,634.0 9,994.4 88,685.4 275,313.7 18,499.9 1,406.0 11,830.5 31,736.4 April ........................................ 184,544.5 8,586.9 89,782.2 282,913.6 18,291.7 1,170.0 11,750.9 31,212.6 May ......................................... 190,405.7 8,372.2 92,647.4 291,425.3 17,928.5 1,121.5 11,450.6 30,500.7 June ........................................ 195,590.0 8,653.2 94,413.2 298,656.4 18,322.7 1,200.9 11,366.3 30,889.9 July ......................................... 193,054.1 8,392.8 92,267.7 293,714.6 18,077.0 1,311.4 11,188.0 30,576.5 August ....................................

88

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

1,233.1 12,289.6 32,109.4 May ... 186,155.2 8,456.3 87,548.4 282,159.9 19,801.8 1,235.1 12,873.4 33,910.2 June ......

89

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,271.9 14,759.4 39,254.5 1999 Average ... 170,969.7 9,988.2 79,456.7 260,414.6 22,467.2 1,516.6 14,336.0 38,319.9 PAD District I January...

90

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,515.4 1,515.4 24,168.6 49,958.8 205,642.8 21,325.8 3,583.5 13,512.4 38,421.7 February ................................. 150,955.0 13,660.5 51,987.1 216,602.6 25,038.0 1,397.6 14,426.9 40,862.5 March ...................................... 163,625.6 5,783.8 52,023.6 221,433.1 26,758.2 374.3 14,421.6 41,554.1 April ........................................ 168,026.4 2,480.7 51,915.9 222,423.1 27,004.8 215.3 14,404.6 41,624.7 May ......................................... 176,606.8 2,535.4 54,024.9 233,167.2 27,876.2 223.5 14,812.1 42,911.8 June ........................................ 183,750.5 2,633.2 56,295.9 242,679.6 28,544.1 231.4 15,275.8 44,051.2 July ......................................... 178,005.9 2,548.4 53,761.7 234,316.0 28,345.2 228.4 15,005.0 43,578.6 August ....................................

91

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

a a Oxygenated Reformulated Total Conventional Oxygenated Reformulated Total United States January ................................... 145,473.9 12,853.1 71,584.0 229,911.0 21,437.8 2,118.5 14,630.3 38,186.5 February ................................. 152,443.6 12,574.1 74,038.8 239,056.4 21,643.8 2,053.6 14,806.9 38,504.4 March ...................................... 159,368.9 9,240.4 75,709.6 244,318.9 22,934.3 1,391.4 14,926.4 39,252.1 April ........................................ 166,869.6 7,329.4 77,383.5 251,582.4 23,130.1 1,079.9 14,885.7 39,095.8 May ......................................... 168,973.6 7,229.8 77,450.7 253,654.2 23,375.0 1,046.4 15,162.5 39,583.9 June ........................................ 176,397.4 7,802.8 78,867.3 263,067.5 24,193.9 1,133.7 15,555.5 40,883.1

92

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

47,959.1 47,959.1 11,050.9 67,812.0 226,822.0 21,260.7 1,818.7 15,161.7 38,241.1 February ................................. 154,899.9 10,617.6 70,698.9 236,216.5 22,197.4 1,690.4 15,506.0 39,393.8 March ...................................... 162,738.2 6,536.2 71,600.9 240,875.3 23,091.5 984.2 15,507.0 39,582.7 April ........................................ 169,900.0 3,421.2 73,432.6 246,753.8 24,144.7 484.4 15,580.3 40,209.3 May ......................................... 170,818.8 4,569.6 73,375.3 248,763.8 24,330.4 617.2 15,767.0 40,714.6 June ........................................ 171,972.1 4,606.4 73,655.1 250,233.6 24,625.0 679.7 16,013.5 41,318.2 July ......................................... 178,120.4 4,586.2 75,480.7 258,187.3 26,160.7 674.2 16,449.8 43,284.8 August ....................................

93

Prime Supplier Report Historical  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1998 1999 January PDF January PDF February PDF February PDF March PDF March PDF April PDF April PDF May PDF May PDF June PDF June PDF July PDF July PDF August PDF August PDF...

94

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

229.8 - - 229.8 1,367.1 - - 1,367.1 October ... 241.1 - - 241.1 1,407.1 - - 1,407.1 November ... 238.4 - - 238.4...

95

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

13,621.8 279.0 14,394.5 1996 Average ... 321.0 6.9 7,031.4 2,531.9 241.1 2,772.9 9,804.4 200.0 10,332.3 Connecticut January ......

96

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

... 15,344.6 - 13,358.4 28,703.0 77,240.7 - 52,000.4 129,241.1 August ... 15,201.5 - 13,221.9 28,423.4 76,061.8 -...

97

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

47,959.1 11,050.9 67,812.0 226,822.0 21,260.7 1,818.7 15,161.7 38,241.1 February ... 154,899.9 10,617.6 70,698.9 236,216.5 22,197.4 1,690.4 15,506.0...

98

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

203.8 97.9 - 301.7 1,770.6 698.9 - 2,469.5 2001 Average ... 241.1 36.7 - 277.8 2,168.5 307.0 - 2,475.5 Texas January ......

99

Prime Supplier Report Historical  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2 2013 January HTML PDF January HTML PDF February HTML PDF February HTML PDF March HTML PDF March HTML PDF April HTML PDF April HTML PDF May HTML PDF May HTML PDF June HTML PDF...

100

Supplier Scouting  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... network of manufacturers and suppliers to help ... grew out of MEP's supplier scouting program ... departments of Transportation, Energy, and Defense ...

2012-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Supplier Development  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... sustained. Benefits: Focus on implementation and results for the supplier; Co-investment by all parties-everyone has a stake in it; ...

2012-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

102

Alabama Aviation Gasoline All Sales/Deliveries by Prime ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

View History: Monthly Annual : Download Data (XLS File) Alabama Aviation Gasoline All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier ... Alabama Prices, ...

103

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View History U.S. 376,636.4 362,968.6 362,798.5 365,247.6 354,951.9 347,234.5 1983-2012 East Coast (PADD 1) 134,534.8 128,463.4 129,135.1 128,893.5 125,252.4 119,021.3 1983-2012 New England (PADD 1A) 17,818.7 17,328.6 17,181.3 17,270.6 17,000.4 16,279.8 1983-2012 Connecticut 4,360.7 4,246.8 4,355.4 4,425.7 4,305.0 3,921.4 1983-2012 Maine 2,060.3 1,866.8 1,878.1 1,888.9 1,881.7 1,852.8 1983-2012 Massachusetts 7,598.2 7,425.7 7,022.2 6,997.2 6,993.4 6,821.5 1983-2012 New Hampshire 1,640.1 1,585.1 1,613.9 1,610.0 1,417.5 1,448.0 1983-2012 Rhode Island 1,286.3 1,401.8 1,380.8 1,417.8 1,514.9 1,340.0 1983-2012 Vermont 873.2 802.4 930.9 931.0 887.9 896.0 1983-2012 Central Atlantic (PADD 1B)

104

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

351,699.1 357,563.7 359,454.4 355,964.6 360,621.2 344,753.3 351,699.1 357,563.7 359,454.4 355,964.6 360,621.2 344,753.3 1983-2013 East Coast (PADD 1) 119,156.1 119,239.6 119,547.5 117,708.0 119,558.2 116,411.8 1983-2013 New England (PADD 1A) 16,290.9 16,389.7 16,865.8 17,252.5 17,023.4 15,696.1 1983-2013 Connecticut 3,962.5 3,969.5 4,012.0 3,982.9 4,034.9 3,938.4 1983-2013 Maine 1,996.1 2,019.3 2,115.5 2,325.4 2,352.0 1,993.8 1983-2013 Massachusetts 6,548.1 6,503.0 6,738.6 6,583.4 6,362.9 5,878.6 1983-2013 New Hampshire 1,640.7 1,674.8 1,710.0 1,881.9 1,811.8 1,630.1 1983-2013 Rhode Island 1,251.2 1,324.8 1,380.6 1,455.4 1,427.8 1,331.8 1983-2013 Vermont 892.2 898.4 909.2 1,023.5 1,034.1 923.4 1983-2013 Central Atlantic (PADD 1B) 41,665.6 41,737.2 42,371.2 42,040.6 42,068.1 41,170.2 1983-2013

105

Variable Screw Compressor, Variable Screw Compressor Suppliers ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Variable Screw Compressor Suppliers & air compressor Manufacturers Directory. Source Top Quality Variable Screw Compressor Suppliers, air ...

106

Adequate NQA-1 Suppliers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 J U N 2 2 2069 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION FROM: DAE Y. CHUNG DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS ENVIRONlMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: Issuance of the Office of Environmental Management Nuclear Supplier Alert System The Office of Environmental Management (EM) and the Energy Facility Contractors Group (EFCOG) Quality Assurance (QA) Corporate Board has developed a Nuclear Supplier Alert System as part of its EMIEFCOG QA Improvement Project Plan. This Corporate Board deliverable was approved by the voting members in the last meeting held on March 19,2009. This system is critical to mitigating past weaknesses in supplier qualification and oversight that have resulted in: I ) project cost overages; 2) schedule

107

Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane,  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

41.8 41.8 706.1 57,805.1 57,186.2 19,255.2 18,038.2 37,293.4 February ................................... 603.8 735.2 58,810.1 55,734.5 14,352.8 19,882.7 34,235.5 March ........................................ 693.1 675.6 59,143.7 40,326.8 13,589.5 18,472.2 32,061.7 April .......................................... 816.1 567.3 60,408.7 33,387.8 9,591.6 17,777.5 27,369.1 May ........................................... 925.8 799.7 60,325.7 26,854.4 7,093.1 16,017.5 23,110.5 June .......................................... 950.1 877.4 61,257.3 26,771.1 8,852.7 17,544.1 26,396.8 July ........................................... 1,030.3 884.1 61,401.8 28,838.3 7,254.9 19,950.4 27,205.4 August ...................................... 1,059.8 881.6 61,710.5 34,944.4 7,342.1 20,393.7 27,735.8 September

108

Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane,  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

71.7 71.7 588.5 56,673.6 54,346.7 12,106.5 21,030.6 33,137.1 February ................................... 834.8 890.3 57,750.3 47,277.7 10,579.0 22,424.4 33,003.4 March ........................................ 731.6 757.0 58,791.1 34,964.0 7,414.9 20,425.4 27,840.2 April .......................................... 766.9 730.9 60,322.2 31,714.4 6,811.5 18,166.1 24,977.7 May ........................................... 897.1 789.7 59,572.1 28,454.2 6,772.5 17,383.9 24,156.5 June .......................................... 940.7 714.1 62,704.7 27,177.7 6,415.2 18,715.9 25,131.1 July ........................................... 1,088.6 710.3 62,496.7 28,647.8 7,508.6 19,724.2 27,232.8 August ...................................... 1,028.5 837.4 62,747.5 31,743.2 8,180.1 18,800.6 26,980.7 September

109

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Total Distillate and Kerosene  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

158,110.5 153,279.5 150,543.5 150,826.0 154,151.9 151,155.6 158,110.5 153,279.5 150,543.5 150,826.0 154,151.9 151,155.6 1983-2013 East Coast (PADD 1) 45,616.9 39,584.9 37,386.4 37,249.3 38,108.9 40,198.6 1983-2013 New England (PADD 1A) 7,083.6 5,358.2 4,555.3 4,567.5 4,734.9 5,447.0 1983-2013 Connecticut 1,603.8 1,148.9 910.2 889.6 964.7 1,155.0 1983-2013 Maine 1,265.6 1,082.5 977.7 1,002.5 996.8 1,198.0 1983-2013 Massachusetts 2,233.0 1,639.5 1,372.6 1,377.2 1,415.8 1,509.8 1983-2013 New Hampshire 812.5 588.7 497.7 491.5 480.2 607.0 1983-2013 Rhode Island 656.7 518.7 450.0 478.7 499.4 548.0 1983-2013 Vermont 512.0 379.7 347.0 328.0 378.0 429.1 1983-2013 Central Atlantic (PADD 1B) 18,767.7 14,932.6 14,136.2 14,447.3 14,730.4 16,140.3 1983-2013 Delaware 259.8 215.9 200.5 302.1 236.3 296.3 1983-2013

110

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of No. 2 Distillate  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

168,925.8 160,598.8 145,896.4 153,446.5 154,149.9 151,477.0 168,925.8 160,598.8 145,896.4 153,446.5 154,149.9 151,477.0 1983-2012 East Coast (PADD 1) 55,302.2 49,966.6 46,003.4 46,441.6 45,918.8 42,389.8 1983-2012 New England (PADD 1A) 9,558.8 8,582.8 7,871.9 7,352.8 7,466.6 6,796.8 1983-2012 Connecticut 2,180.4 2,106.3 2,025.6 1,902.3 1,920.9 1,669.3 1983-2012 Maine 1,862.9 1,594.3 1,370.5 1,216.6 1,313.4 1,273.6 1983-2012 Massachusetts 2,862.2 2,511.5 2,225.4 2,059.7 2,088.0 1,925.8 1983-2012 New Hampshire 1,080.6 969.1 892.4 836.0 825.1 740.4 1983-2012 Rhode Island 1,038.7 935.7 907 885.0 855.8 746.0 1983-2012 Vermont 533.9 465.7 451 453.2 463.4 441.7 1983-2012 Central Atlantic (PADD 1B) 22,289.5 19,946.8 18,693.7 19,048.0 18,863.1 16,562.1 1983-2012 Delaware

111

Utah Kerosene All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier (Thousand ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9; 1980's: 1.0: W: W: 0.7: 0.7: W: W: 1990's: 0.9: W: W: 1.2: W: W: W: W: W: W: 2000's: W ...

112

Utah Propane All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier (Thousand ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9; 1980's: 116.2: 110.8: 154.6: 125.2: 144.8: 149.9: 130.8: 1990's: 115.4: 140.7: 136.6 ...

113

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Distillate Fuel Oils and Kerosene...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

824.7 684.2 24,433.3 85,531.2 19,553.6 105,084.8 129,518.1 429.2 131,456.3 July ... 924.3 684.5 23,436.9 87,740.4 20,605.7...

114

Table 48. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

2,271.9 14,759.4 39,254.5 1999 Average ... 170,969.7 9,988.2 79,456.7 260,414.6 22,467.2 1,516.6 14,336.0 38,319.9 PAD District I January...

115

U.S. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View History Motor Gasoline 376,636.4 362,968.6 362,798.5 365,247.6 354,951.9 347,234.5 1983-2012 Regular 320,735.1 314,030.5 313,098.1 315,643.3 309,398.0 301,510.3 1983-2012 Conventional Regular 216,075 207,958.8 208,347.1 210,638.4 204,350.9 200,785.6 1994-2012 Oxygenated Regular - - - - - - 1994-2012 Reformulated Regular 104,660 106,071.7 104,751.1 105,004.9 105,047.1 100,724.7 1994-2012 Midgrade 20,282.6 18,229.4 16,706.5 15,633.9 13,707.6 13,500.5 1989-2012 Conventional Midgrade 14,369.3 13,559.2 12,537.8 11,971.8 10,521.2 10,550.0 1994-2012 Oxygenated Midgrade - - - - - - 1994-2012 Reformulated Midgrade 5,913.4 4,670.2 4,168.7 3,662.1 3,186.4 2,950.5 1994-2012 Premium

116

Table 49. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Aviation Fuels, Propane,  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

64.8 64.8 1,113.8 54,765.4 50,474.8 14,751.6 15,834.7 30,586.3 February ................................... 668.4 1,109.1 51,874.7 53,325.1 15,057.1 18,393.2 33,450.3 March ........................................ 769.5 1,087.5 53,941.3 38,432.9 12,043.4 16,348.0 28,391.3 April .......................................... 802.8 911.4 54,353.2 30,216.7 8,771.4 14,743.5 23,515.0 May ........................................... 973.7 1,080.8 55,284.8 27,798.1 7,705.6 15,130.0 22,835.6 June .......................................... 1,000.6 991.1 56,209.3 28,204.2 9,455.4 13,696.5 23,151.9 July ........................................... 1,063.8 1,300.5 56,468.8 27,811.1 10,786.1 12,367.3 23,153.4 August ...................................... 1,098.5 1,188.9 57,758.7 32,654.7 10,893.1 15,430.4

117

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

58,921.8 56,922.5 55,453.9 54,959.2 53,458.9 54,523.8 1983-2012 58,921.8 56,922.5 55,453.9 54,959.2 53,458.9 54,523.8 1983-2012 East Coast (PADD 1) 15,392.8 16,081.8 15,898.2 15,821.2 15,588.0 15,512.9 1983-2012 New England (PADD 1A) 1,279.6 1,525.1 1,132.7 1,146.9 1,177.7 1,153.8 1983-2012 Connecticut 204.6 192.9 153.5 157.1 W 181.0 1983-2012 Maine 175.6 141.7 134.2 161.7 132.7 125.2 1983-2012 Massachusetts 819.4 1,118 676.6 675.6 720.1 710.2 1983-2012 New Hampshire 15.1 15.4 W 62.0 64.1 38.8 1983-2012 Rhode Island 33.3 30.3 75.7 67.2 W W 1983-2012 Vermont 31.6 26.9 W 23.4 23.8 W 1983-2012 Central Atlantic (PADD 1B) 7,527.2 7,614.5 7,315.1 7,397.0 7,311.6 7,228.9 1983-2012 Delaware 11.2 11.9 8.7 10.1 10.0 14.1 1983-2012 District of Columbia - - - - - - 1983-2012

118

Ohio Kerosene All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier (Thousand ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec; 1983: 350.6: 257.6: 167.9: 127.2: 40.1: 31.9: 25.5: 51.9: 167.0: 155.5: 262.8: 516.4: 1984: 575.1: 281.9: 310.6 ...

119

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Distillate Fuel Oils and Kerosene...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

13,621.8 279.0 14,394.5 1996 Average ... 321.0 6.9 7,031.4 2,531.9 241.1 2,772.9 9,804.4 200.0 10,332.3 Connecticut January ......

120

Table 50. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Distillate Fuel Oils...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

- 2,146.5 June ... 5.4 - 330.3 W W 1,905.5 2,235.7 - 2,241.1 July ... 3.6 - 319.3 1,516.8 237.5 1,754.3 2,073.6 -...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Table 50. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Distillate Fuel Oils...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

July ... W W 332.2 832.2 62.7 895.0 1,227.2 W 1,241.1 August ... 13.8 W 374.0 849.3 65.3 914.6 1,288.6 W...

122

Table 48. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

47,959.1 11,050.9 67,812.0 226,822.0 21,260.7 1,818.7 15,161.7 38,241.1 February ... 154,899.9 10,617.6 70,698.9 236,216.5 22,197.4 1,690.4 15,506.0...

123

Table 48. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

229.8 - - 229.8 1,367.1 - - 1,367.1 October ... 241.1 - - 241.1 1,407.1 - - 1,407.1 November ... 238.4 - - 238.4...

124

Table 48. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

... 15,344.6 - 13,358.4 28,703.0 77,240.7 - 52,000.4 129,241.1 August ... 15,201.5 - 13,221.9 28,423.4 76,061.8 -...

125

Colorado Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

-No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Values shown for the ...

126

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Naphtha-Type Jet Fuel  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

-No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Values shown for the ...

127

Nebraska Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

-No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Values shown for the ...

128

Louisiana Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

-No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Values shown for the ...

129

Minnesota Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 View History; Motor Gasoline: 5,794.2: 5,829.3: 6,309.3: 6,596.7: 6,838.3: 6,655.3: 1983-2013

130

U.S. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

-No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Values shown for the ...

131

Tennessee Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

-No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Values shown for the ...

132

Minnesota Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

-No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Values shown for the ...

133

U.S. Energy Information Administration/Prime Supplier Report...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Sales of Petroleum Products Sold for Local Consumption." These data measure primary petroleum product deliveries into the States where they are locally marketed and consumed....

134

PADD 1 Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

-No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Values shown for the ...

135

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

58,386.8 57,380.8 57,511.7 61,022.4 59,252.0 55,062.2 1983-2013 58,386.8 57,380.8 57,511.7 61,022.4 59,252.0 55,062.2 1983-2013 East Coast (PADD 1) 18,284.2 16,437.1 16,943.8 16,884.2 16,412.3 14,287.5 1983-2013 New England (PADD 1A) 1,211.3 1,172.2 1,228.4 1,207.8 1,432.6 1,121.1 1983-2013 Connecticut 212.1 202.7 207.0 164.4 246.4 169.3 1983-2013 Maine 115.8 127.2 131.1 141.6 144.0 137.8 1983-2013 Massachusetts 738.4 705.5 738.7 743.0 863.8 670.3 1983-2013 New Hampshire 37.4 29.5 35.2 41.8 50.6 44.1 1983-2013 Rhode Island 88.5 W 89.9 89.9 99.2 76.9 1983-2013 Vermont 19.1 W 26.5 27.0 28.7 22.7 1983-2013 Central Atlantic (PADD 1B) 9,320.4 7,996.8 8,594.9 8,104.5 8,284.9 7,114.1 1983-2013 Delaware W W W W W W 1983-2013 District of Columbia W W W W W W 1983-2013

136

Adequate NQA-1 Suppliers | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Adequate NQA-1 Suppliers Adequate NQA-1 Suppliers Scope of Project Milestone Task 2.6: Request the procedures used for qualifying nuclear grade suppliers from each major EM...

137

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Supplier Requirements  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Propane Supplier Propane Supplier Requirements to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Supplier Requirements on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Supplier Requirements on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Supplier Requirements on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Supplier Requirements on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Supplier Requirements on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Supplier Requirements on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Propane Supplier Requirements A retail supplier may only distribute liquefied petroleum gas (LPG or propane) if the supplier holds a license from the Wisconsin Department of

138

Refinery suppliers face tough times  

SciTech Connect

Despite a handful of bright spots in hydroprocessing and petrochemical sectors, economic woes plague much of the refinery and petrochemical catalysts business, as suppliers are feeling the impact of mature markets and refiners` ongoing cost cutting. Industry experts say the doldrums could spur further restructuring in the catalyst business, with suppliers scrambling for market share and jockeying for position in growing sectors. Expect further consolidation over the next several years, says Pierre Bonnifay, president of IFP Enterprises (New York). {open_quotes}There are still too many players for the mature [refinery catalyst] markets.{close_quotes} Others agree. {open_quotes}Only about seven [or] eight major suppliers will survive,{close_quotes} says Robert Allsmiller, v.p./refinery and petrochemical catalysts at United Catalysts Inc. (UCI; Louisville, KY). {open_quotes}Who they [will be] is still up in the air.{close_quotes}

Rotman, D.; Walsh, K.

1997-03-12T23:59:59.000Z

139

New Jersey Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel All Sales/Deliveries by Prime ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

New Jersey Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier (Thousand Gallons per Day) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8

140

Optimization Online - Recruiting Suppliers for Reverse Production ...  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Mar 14, 2007 ... Recruiting Suppliers for Reverse Production Systems: an MDP Heuristics Approach. Wuthichai Wongthatsanekorn(wwongtha ***at***...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

UK mining invests, suppliers profit  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In the midst of a major economic crisis in the United Kingdom, equipment suppliers have been reporting a number of considerable purchases by British coal mining companies. In December 2008, Liebherr-Great Britain delivered the first two of four Rq350 Litronic hydraulic excavators for use at the Broken Cross opencast coal site in Lanarkshire, Scotland. Ten Terex TR100 rigid haulers were delivered to the site in late 2008. Hatfield Colliery at Stainforth, South Yorkshire, has been reopened by PowerFuel. The main equipment for two longwall faces was supplied by Joy Mining Machinery UK Ltd. 2 photos.

NONE

2009-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

142

Window Manufacturer Sees Business Surge As Weatherization Supplier...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Window Manufacturer Sees Business Surge As Weatherization Supplier Window Manufacturer Sees Business Surge As Weatherization Supplier July 29, 2010 - 4:33pm Addthis Joshua DeLung...

143

Primes In Cubic Arithmetic Progressions  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This work proposes a proof of the simplest cubic primes counting problem. It shows that the subset of primes {p = n^3 + 2 is prime : n => 1} is an infinite subset of primes. Further, the expected order of magnitude of the cubic primes counting function is established.

N. A. Carella

2013-02-04T23:59:59.000Z

144

Sandia National Laboratories: Working with Sandia: Current Suppliers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Current Suppliers Current Suppliers Opportunities Potential Suppliers Current Suppliers Accounts Payable Contract Audit Contractor/Bidder Information Construction and Facilities Staff Augmentation What Does Sandia Buy? Enterprise IT Services Working with Sandia Current Suppliers Accounts Payable Provides the information you need to properly submit invoices and has other useful guidelines and tips. Contract Audit Sandia National Laboratories has designated the Contract Audit Department as an independent appraisal function. The department is responsible for the audit of supplier contracts and subcontracts that support the Laboratories' mission. Contract Audit also provides accounting and financial services in connection with the negotiation, administration, and settlement of costs for contracts placed by Sandia Procurement.

145

Prime GLP Inc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GLP Inc GLP Inc Jump to: navigation, search Name Prime GLP Inc Place Anseong, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (Republic) Zip 456-933 Sector Solar Product Korean supplier of scrap silicon to the solar industry. Coordinates 37.019451°, 127.315132° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.019451,"lon":127.315132,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

146

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dec '06 to Jan '07: +9.7% Dec '06 to Jan '07: +9.7% Jan '06 to Jan '07: +2.1% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +2.1% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '06 to Jan '07: +18.7% Jan '06 to Jan '07: -1.4% YTD '06 to YTD '07: -1.4% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '06 to Jan '07: -2.7% Jan '06 to Jan '07: +0.9% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.9% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Dec '06 to Jan '07: -3.8% Jan '06 to Jan '07: +2.6% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +2.6%

147

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr '06 to May '06: +1.5% Apr '06 to May '06: +1.5% May '05 to May '06: +1.4% YTD '05 to YTD '06: -0.3% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2004 2005 2006 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '06 to May '06: +7.0% May '05 to May '06: +2.8% YTD '05 to YTD '06: -12.2% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2004 2005 2006 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '06 to May '06: -0.4% May '05 to May '06: -3.9% YTD '05 to YTD '06: -2.6% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2004 2005 2006 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '06 to May '06: +0.8% May '05 to May '06: -2.3% YTD '05 to YTD '06: -0.8%

148

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar '08 to Apr '08: +3.7% Mar '08 to Apr '08: +3.7% Apr '07 to Apr '08: +1.8% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -3.5% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2006 2007 2008 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '08 to Apr '08: +6.7% Apr '07 to Apr '08 -22.4% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -21.6% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2006 2007 2008 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '08 to Apr '08: +4.8% Apr '07 to Apr '08: -0.5% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -2.0% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2006 2007 2008 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '08 to Apr '08: +2.1% Apr '07 to Apr '08: -1.0% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -2.4%

149

Table 48. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by Grade, Formulation,  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6,610.0 6,610.0 22,435.3 49,088.9 208,134.2 22,186.7 4,984.3 13,786.2 40,957.2 February ................................. 153,634.8 13,112.4 51,743.2 218,490.3 25,891.2 2,648.7 14,587.8 43,127.7 March ...................................... 164,511.0 5,627.4 54,891.2 225,029.5 27,541.1 1,003.3 14,659.5 43,203.8 April ........................................ 171,743.7 3,242.7 64,778.3 239,764.6 26,368.4 481.6 16,027.4 42,877.4 May ......................................... 174,844.7 3,228.7 71,439.4 249,512.7 24,576.4 457.5 16,101.8 41,135.6 June ........................................ 173,854.4 3,274.9 72,458.5 249,587.8 24,566.8 478.5 16,375.5 41,420.8 July ......................................... 177,228.5 3,307.7 70,689.0 251,225.3 25,495.0 485.5 16,323.6 42,304.1 August ....................................

150

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May '06 to Jun '06: -0.6% May '06 to Jun '06: -0.6% Jun '05 to Jun '06: -0.7% YTD '05 to YTD '06: -0.3% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2004 2005 2006 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '06 to Jun '06: -9.0% Jun '05 to Jun '06: -22.8% YTD '05 to YTD '06: -13.9% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2004 2005 2006 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '06 to Jun '06: +5.1% Jun '05 to Jun '06: -4.7% YTD '05 to YTD '06: -3.0% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2004 2005 2006 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '06 to Jun '06: +2.5% Jun '05 to Jun '06: -2.0% YTD '05 to YTD '06: -1.1%

151

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4,100 4,100 4,400 4,700 5,000 5,300 5,600 5,900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Distillate Fuel Sales 2009 2001 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '11 to Mar '11: -1.4% Mar '10 to Mar '11: +1.0% YTD '10 to YTD '11: +2.4% 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 2009 2001 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '11 to Mar '11: +0.8% Mar '10 to Mar '11: -1.7% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -7.3% 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 2009 2001 2011 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '11 to Mar '11: +7.0% Mar '10 to Mar '11: -0.7% YTD '10 to YTD '11: +0.5% 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

152

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Feb '08 to Mar '08: -4.4% Feb '08 to Mar '08: -4.4% Mar '07 to Mar '08: -7.3% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -5.2% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2006 2007 2008 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '08 to Mar '08: -10.3% Mar '07 to Mar '08 -24.3% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -21.0% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2006 2007 2008 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '08 to Mar '08: -0.4% Mar '07 to Mar '08: -3.1% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -2.5% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2006 2007 2008 Adjusted Growth Rates* Feb '08 to Mar '08: +0.2% Mar '07 to Mar '08: -3.5% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -2.9%

153

Table 48. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by Grade, Formulation,  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5,473.9 5,473.9 12,853.1 71,584.0 229,911.0 21,437.8 2,118.5 14,630.3 38,186.5 February ................................. 152,443.6 12,574.1 74,038.8 239,056.4 21,643.8 2,053.6 14,806.9 38,504.4 March ...................................... 159,368.9 9,240.4 75,709.6 244,318.9 22,934.3 1,391.4 14,926.4 39,252.1 April ........................................ 166,869.6 7,329.4 77,383.5 251,582.4 23,130.1 1,079.9 14,885.7 39,095.8 May ......................................... 168,973.6 7,229.8 77,450.7 253,654.2 23,375.0 1,046.4 15,162.5 39,583.9 June ........................................ 176,397.4 7,802.8 78,867.3 263,067.5 24,193.9 1,133.7 15,555.5 40,883.1 July ......................................... 175,934.1 7,670.5 79,172.1 262,776.7 24,363.6 1,128.7 15,903.0 41,395.3 August ....................................

154

Table 48. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by Grade, Formulation,  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

47,959.1 47,959.1 11,050.9 67,812.0 226,822.0 21,260.7 1,818.7 15,161.7 38,241.1 February ................................. 154,899.9 10,617.6 70,698.9 236,216.5 22,197.4 1,690.4 15,506.0 39,393.8 March ...................................... 162,738.2 6,536.2 71,600.9 240,875.3 23,091.5 984.2 15,507.0 39,582.7 April ........................................ 169,900.0 3,421.2 73,432.6 246,753.8 24,144.7 484.4 15,580.3 40,209.3 May ......................................... 170,818.8 4,569.6 73,375.3 248,763.8 24,330.4 617.2 15,767.0 40,714.6 June ........................................ 171,972.1 4,606.4 73,655.1 250,233.6 24,625.0 679.7 16,013.5 41,318.2 July ......................................... 178,120.4 4,586.2 75,480.7 258,187.3 26,160.7 674.2 16,449.8 43,284.8 August ....................................

155

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May '99 to June '99: +5.7% May '99 to June '99: +5.7% June '98 to June '99: +5.4% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +6.8% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1997 1998 1999 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '99 to June '99: +3.3% June '98 to June '99: +0.3% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +1.3% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1997 1998 1999 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '99 to June '99: +2.7% June '98 to June '99: -0.6% YTD '98 to YTD '99: -0.5% U.S. Propane Sales 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1997 1998 1999 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '99 to June '99: +7.9% June '98 to June '99: +4.3% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +6.8%

156

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jul '09 to Aug '09: -1.8% Jul '09 to Aug '09: -1.8% Aug '08 to Aug '09: -9.7% YTD '08 to YTD '09: -10.2% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2007 2008 2009 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '09 to Aug '09: -8.4% Aug '08 to Aug '09: -4.5% YTD '08 to YTD '09: -5.6% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2007 2008 2009 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '09 to Aug '09: -1.9% Aug '08 to Aug '09: -2.4% YTD '08 to YTD '09: -6.7% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2007 2008 2009 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '09 to Aug '09: -1.1% Aug '08 to Aug '09: +1.3% YTD '08 to YTD '09: -0.2%

157

Table 50. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Distillate Fuel Oils and Kerosene  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

048.9 048.9 3,882.7 43,253.5 78,544.5 20,983.0 99,527.5 142,781.0 1,215.1 152,927.6 February ............................. 4,331.5 2,419.0 42,453.9 81,957.0 20,781.0 102,737.9 145,191.8 1,145.6 153,087.9 March .................................. 3,374.8 1,616.3 38,313.8 87,940.5 21,866.1 109,806.6 148,120.5 1,062.2 154,173.8 April .................................... 1,699.2 728.2 28,122.4 90,081.2 20,288.6 110,369.8 138,492.2 639.3 141,558.9 May ..................................... 1,294.6 643.7 22,565.9 88,582.4 20,702.3 109,284.6 131,850.5 482.9 134,271.8 June .................................... 1,675.6 579.4 23,580.9 96,532.1 21,436.8 117,968.9 141,549.8 385.0 144,189.9 July ..................................... 1,577.3 605.1 22,198.4 92,096.8 21,709.0 113,805.8 136,004.2 656.0 138,842.6

158

Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Distillate Fuel Oils and Kerosene by PAD District and State  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7,583.7 7,583.7 5,086.5 57,988.5 72,118.7 20,784.9 92,903.6 150,892.1 2,271.3 165,833.6 February ............................. 7,190.5 4,192.4 55,685.0 76,234.8 22,030.8 98,265.6 153,950.6 2,265.8 167,599.4 March .................................. 3,741.4 1,832.9 42,789.1 78,746.7 20,513.7 99,260.4 142,049.5 1,644.7 149,268.5 April .................................... 1,759.1 694.2 33,643.2 85,180.7 21,967.4 107,148.0 140,791.2 1,157.8 144,402.3 May ..................................... 1,029.0 473.8 25,651.8 83,213.2 21,779.5 104,992.8 130,644.5 661.5 132,808.8 June .................................... 1,148.6 527.8 23,238.7 83,513.2 21,394.3 104,907.5 128,146.2 536.4 130,359.0 July ..................................... 868.0 541.3 22,987.0 82,742.6 20,917.3 103,659.8 126,646.8 517.0 128,573.1

159

Table 48. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Motor Gasoline by Grade, Formulation,  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,515.4 1,515.4 24,168.6 49,958.8 205,642.8 21,325.8 3,583.5 13,512.4 38,421.7 February ................................. 150,955.0 13,660.5 51,987.1 216,602.6 25,038.0 1,397.6 14,426.9 40,862.5 March ...................................... 163,625.6 5,783.8 52,023.6 221,433.1 26,758.2 374.3 14,421.6 41,554.1 April ........................................ 168,026.4 2,480.7 51,915.9 222,423.1 27,004.8 215.3 14,404.6 41,624.7 May ......................................... 176,606.8 2,535.4 54,024.9 233,167.2 27,876.2 223.5 14,812.1 42,911.8 June ........................................ 183,750.5 2,633.2 56,295.9 242,679.6 28,544.1 231.4 15,275.8 44,051.2 July ......................................... 178,005.9 2,548.4 53,761.7 234,316.0 28,345.2 228.4 15,005.0 43,578.6 August ....................................

160

Ohio Jet Fuel Naphtha All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9; 1980's: W: 137.5: W: W: 119.4: 238.7: W: 1990's: 41.6: 227.3: W: 0.0: W: W: W: W: W ...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Alabama Residual Fuel Oil All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9; 1980's: 323.3: 250.8: 232.9: 241.5: 230.3: 313.2: 340.2: 1990's: 334.8: 318.8: W: 274.2 ...

162

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar '03 to Apr '03: -4.0% Apr '02 to Apr '03: -11.6% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -6.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

163

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Jun '04 to Jul '04: -3.1% Jul '03 to Jul '04: +6.5% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.6% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

164

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May '03 to Jun '03: +5.1% Jun '02 to Jun '03: -6.7% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -7.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

165

X:\\L6046\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Apr '08 to May '08: -0.8% May '07 to May '08: -4.6% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -2.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

166

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

May '99 to June '99: +2.7% June '98 to June '99: -0.6% YTD '98 to YTD '99: -0.5% U.S. Propane Sales 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct...

167

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar '05 to Apr '05: +1.4% Apr '04 to Apr '05: -0.5% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +1.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

168

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Dec '04 to Jan '05: -5.1% Jan '04 to Jan '05: -0.3% YTD '04 to YTD '05: -0.3% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

169

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Sep '01 to Oct '01: -1.9% Oct '00 to Oct '01: -12.0% YTD '00 to YTD '01: -0.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

170

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr. '99 to May '99: +2.7% May '98 to May '99: +0.9% YTD '98 to YTD '99: -0.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct...

171

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Mar '08 to Apr '08: +2.1% Apr '07 to Apr '08: -1.0% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -2.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

172

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Oct '03 to Nov '03: -3.0% Nov '02 to Nov '03: -10.9% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -8.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

173

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Dec '03 to Jan '04: -1.8% Jan '03 to Jan '04: +0.9% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +0.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

174

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Sep '04 to Oct '04: -2.0% Oct '03 to Oct '04: +8.4% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

175

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Feb '04 to Mar '04: +1.9% Mar '03 to Mar '04: +4.0% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +2.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

176

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Nov '03 to Dec '03: +2.8% Dec '02 to Dec '03: -6.0% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -8.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

177

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Jan '08 to Feb '08: +3.4% Feb '07 to Feb '08: -2.5% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -2.5% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

178

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Apr '04 to May '04: -5.1% May '03 to May '04: +8.1% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +6.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

179

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Jul '03 to Aug '03: +0.8% Aug '02 to Aug '03: -7.7% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -7.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

180

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Nov '01 to Dec '01: -2.9% Dec '00 to Dec '01: -6.7% YTD '00 to YTD '01: -0.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

May '05 to Jun '05: +5.7% Jun '04 to Jun '05: +2.5% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +1.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

182

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Aug '03 to Sep '03: +0.9% Sep '02 to Sep '03: -6.1% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -7.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

183

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

May '04 to Jun '04: +6.7% Jun '03 to Jun '04: +12.2% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

184

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Mar '02 to Apr '02: -1.9% Apr '01 to Apr '02: -0.2% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -2.8% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

185

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar. '99 to Apr. '99: +2.7% Apr. '98 to Apr. '99: +0.9% YTD '98 to YTD '99: -0.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct...

186

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Aug '04 to Sep '04: -2.4% Sep '03 to Sep '04: +5.7% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.6% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

187

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Oct '01 to Nov '01: +11.1% Nov '00 to Nov '01: -2.9% YTD '00 to YTD '01: -0.3% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

188

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Sep '03 to Oct '03: -5.5% Oct '02 to Oct '03: -11.2% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -8.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

189

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Jan '04 to Feb '04: +2.1% Feb '03 to Feb '04: +1.0% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +2.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

190

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jan '02 to Feb '02: +7.3% Feb '01 to Feb '02: -2.6% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -5.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

191

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Aug '02 to Sep '02: -0.5% Sep '01 to Sep '02: +10.8% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

192

X:\\L6046\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Sep '05 to Oct '05: -4.4% Oct '04 to Oct '05: +0.9% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +3.8% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

193

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Feb '08 to Mar '08: +0.2% Mar '07 to Mar '08: -3.5% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -2.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

194

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nov '04 to Dec '04: -0.9% Dec '03 to Dec '04: +4.1% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.3% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

195

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Apr '02 to May '02: -3.6% May '01 to May '02: -7.7% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

196

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\historical\\2006\\10...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jun '07 to Jul '07: -2.1% Jul '06 to Jul '07: -0.6% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

197

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Feb '07 to Mar '07: +1.6% Mar '06 to Mar '07: +1.1% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +1.5% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

198

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\historical\\2006\\10...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May '07 to Jun '07: +1.2% Jun '06 to Jun '07: +0.1% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

199

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jul '02 to Aug '02: -4.6% Aug '01 to Aug '02: -9.4% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -5.0% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

200

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Sep '02 to Oct '02: -0.0% Oct '01 to Oct '02: +11.5% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -2.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Feb '05 to Mar '05: +0.6% Mar '04 to Mar '05: +3.2% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +2.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

202

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Apr '05 to May '05: -1.0% May '04 to May '05: +3.7% YTD '04 to YTD '05: +1.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

203

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Mar '04 to Apr '04: +5.2% Apr '03 to Apr '04: +15.0% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +5.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

204

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jun '02 to Jul '02: +6.6% Jul '01 to Jul '02: -1.0% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

205

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Feb '02 to Mar '02: +5.0% Mar '01 to Mar '02: -0.7% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -3.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

206

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May '02 to Jun '02: +3.6% Jun '01 to Jun '02: -5.3% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -4.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

207

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Feb '03 to Mar '03: -1.8% Mar '02 to Mar '03: -10.2% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -5.3% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

208

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Jun '01 to Jul '01: +2.0% Jul '00 to Jul '01: +1.5% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +3.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

209

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Apr '03 to May '03: +0.2% May '02 to May '03: -9.1% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -7.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

210

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dec '06 to Jan '07: -3.8% Jan '06 to Jan '07: +2.6% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +2.6% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

211

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\historical\\2006\\10...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar '07 to Apr '07: -0.4% Apr '06 to Apr '07: -0.8% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.7% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

212

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Aug '01 to Sep '01: -18.2% Sep '00 to Sep '01: -14.5% YTD '00 to YTD '01: +1.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

213

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Jun '03 to Jul '03: +1.3% Jul '02 to Jul '03: -11.6% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -8.0% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

214

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Nov '07 to Dec '07: -2.1% Dec '06 to Dec '07: -2.7% YTD '06 to YTD '07: -0.0% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

215

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dec '02 to Jan '03: -5.3% Jan '02 to Jan '03: -1.2% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -1.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

216

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oct '04 to Nov '04: -0.1% Nov '03 to Nov '04: +7.1% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.6% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

217

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

May '06 to Jun '06: +2.5% Jun '05 to Jun '06: -2.0% YTD '05 to YTD '06: -1.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

218

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr '06 to May '06: +0.8% May '05 to May '06: -2.3% YTD '05 to YTD '06: -0.8% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

219

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Nov '02 to Dec '02: -3.6% Dec '01 to Dec '02: -2.2% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -2.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

220

X:\\L6046\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May '08 to Jun '08: -0.8% Jun '07 to Jun '08: -6.6% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -3.5% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Jan '03 to Feb '03: +4.6% Feb '02 to Feb '03: -3.8% YTD '02 to YTD '03: -2.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

222

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oct '02 to Nov '02: -2.4% Nov '01 to Nov '02: -1.5% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -2.1% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

223

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\historical\\2006\\10...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Aug '07 to Sep '07: -4.2% Sep '06 to Sep '07: -0.3% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.3% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

224

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Jul '04 to Aug '04: +3.8% Aug '03 to Aug '04: +9.4% YTD '03 to YTD '04: +7.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

225

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Dec '01 to Jan '02: -5.2% Jan '01 to Jan '02: -7.9% YTD '01 to YTD '02: -7.9% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

226

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\historical\\2006\\10...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jul '07 to Aug '07: +2.5% Aug '06 to Aug '07: -0.1% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

227

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\historical\\2006\\10...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr '07 to May '07: +2.8% May '06 to May '07: +1.3% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.8% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

228

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\current\\ventura\\c007...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Oct '07 to Nov '07: -2.5% Nov '06 to Nov '07: -1.3% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.2% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

229

O:\\Data_Publication\\Prime Supplier Report\\historical\\2006\\10...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Sep '07 to Oct '07: +1.3% Oct '06 to Oct '07: +0.7% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec...

230

EIA-782C MONTHLY REPORT OF PRIME SUPPLIER SALES OF PETROLEUM ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

U.S. Department of Energy Ben Franklin Station PO Box 279 Washington, DC 20044-0279 ... response to an order. The information may be used for

231

X:\L6046\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May '08 to Jun '08: -1.7% May '08 to Jun '08: -1.7% Jun '07 to Jun '08: -3.0% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -3.6% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2006 2007 2008 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '08 to Jun '08: +3.9% Jun '07 to Jun '08 -16.6% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -21.7% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2006 2007 2008 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '08 to Jun '08: +5.0% Jun '07 to Jun '08: -1.4% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -1.7% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2006 2007 2008 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '08 to Jun '08: -0.8% Jun '07 to Jun '08: -6.6% YTD '07 to YTD '08: -3.5%

232

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar. '99 to Apr. '99: -10.2% Mar. '99 to Apr. '99: -10.2% Apr. '98 to Apr. '99: +9.7% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +7.8% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1997 1998 1999 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar. '99 to Apr. '99: +1.9% Apr. '98 to Apr. '99: +1.9% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +1.8% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1997 1998 1999 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar. '99 to Apr. '99: +2.7% Apr. '98 to Apr. '99: +0.9% YTD '98 to YTD '99: -0.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1997 1998 1999 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar. '99 to Apr. '99: -25.6% Apr. '98 to Apr. '99: +6.3% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +7.5%

233

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oct '07 to Nov '07: -3.0% Oct '07 to Nov '07: -3.0% Nov '06 to Nov '07: +3.1% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +2.4% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '07 to Nov '07: +5.2% Nov '06 to Nov '07 -1.3% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +5.6% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '07 to Nov '07: -2.6% Nov '06 to Nov '07: +4.6% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +2.2% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Oct '07 to Nov '07: -2.5% Nov '06 to Nov '07: -1.3% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.2%

234

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Aug '09 to Sep '09: +6.3% Aug '09 to Sep '09: +6.3% Sep '08 to Sep '09: -5.4% YTD '08 to YTD '09: -9.7% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2007 2008 2009 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '09 to Sep '09: -2.0% Sep '08 to Sep '09: -4.1% YTD '08 to YTD '09: -5.5% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2007 2008 2009 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '09 to Sep '09: -1.3% Sep '08 to Sep '09: +3.5% YTD '08 to YTD '09: -5.7% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2007 2008 2009 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '09 to Sep '09: -2.0% Sep '08 to Sep '09: +4.1% YTD '08 to YTD '09: +0.2%

235

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\current\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr. '99 to May '99: -2.9% Apr. '99 to May '99: -2.9% May '98 to May '99: +8.6% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +7.4% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1997 1998 1999 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr. '99 to May '99: +1.0% May '98 to May '99: +1.4% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +1.5% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1997 1998 1999 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr. '99 to May '99: +2.7% May '98 to May '99: +0.9% YTD '98 to YTD '99: -0.4% U.S. Propane Sales 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 1997 1998 1999 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr. '99 to May '99: -18.0% May '98 to May '99: +5.2% YTD '98 to YTD '99: +7.2%

236

New Mexico Jet Fuel Naphtha All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec; 1983: W: W: W: W: W: W: W: 248.4: W: W: 27.9: W: 1984: W: W: 110.3: 220.2: 180.5: 72.6: W: W: W: W: W: W: 1985 ...

237

Electricity Suppliers' Service Area Assignments (Indiana) | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electricity Suppliers' Service Area Assignments (Indiana) Electricity Suppliers&#039; Service Area Assignments (Indiana) Electricity Suppliers' Service Area Assignments (Indiana) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Indiana Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Utility Regulatory Commission To promote efficiency and avoid waste and duplication, rural and

238

The emerging nuclear suppliers: some guidelines for policy (U)  

SciTech Connect

Lewis A. Dunn, a former Assistant Director of the US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and now a senior analyst with Science Applications International Corporation, looks to the future to offer "The Emerging Nuclear Suppliers: Some Guidelines for Policy ." Mr. Dunn notes that although most emerging suppliers are cautious, many are not party to existing nonproliferation treaties. He calls upon the nonproliferation community to continue the present policy of not supporting unsafeguarded nuclear activities. He suggests that the nonproliferation community work within existing standards and infrastructures of nuclear suppliers to convince emerging supplier nations of the merits of nuclear export control.

Dunn, Lewis A.

1988-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

239

buy vsd air compressor - high quality Manufacturers,Suppliers ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

vsd air compressor trade offers directory and vsd air compressor business offers list. Trade leads from vsd air compressor Suppliers and vsd air ...

240

Long-Term Contracts Under the Threat of Supplier Default  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Contracting with suppliers prone to default is an increasingly common problem in some industries, particularly automotive manufacturing. We model this phenomenon as a two-period contracting game with two identical suppliers, a single buyer, deterministic ... Keywords: contracting, financial default, game theory, supply chain management

Robert Swinney; Serguei Netessine

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

A fuzzy-Bayesian model for supplier selection  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The selection supplier problem has received a lot of attention from academics in recent years. Several models were developed in the literature, combining consolidated operations research and artificial intelligence methods and techniques. However, the ... Keywords: Bayesian networks, Fuzzy, Influence diagrams, Supplier selection, Supply chain

Luciano Ferreira; Denis Borenstein

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Comment to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers Comment to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers Comment by Cameco Resources On Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers, 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (July 27, 2010), Section 934 Rule Making. As discussed below, Cameco believes that producers and providers of uranium concentrates and UF6 conversion services, whether directly or as an intermediary, should be excluded from the definition of nuclear supplier. In this regard, Cameco generally agrees with the comments submitted by the Nuclear Energy Institute ("NEI") on behalf of its members; however, Cameco disagrees with the implication of NEl's comments that producers of uranium concentrates and providers of conversion services should be included in the

243

NREL: Education Programs - Kit and Component Supplier List  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Kit and Component Supplier List Kit and Component Supplier List Learn about available kits and component suppliers for NREL's Car Competitions, a classroom-based, hands-on educational program for 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students. Please contact suppliers for pricing. Junior Solar Sprint Suppliers Products Solar Made 2807 North Prospect Colorado Springs, CO 80907 Tel: 1-800-246-7012 Fax: 719-635-5398 E-mail: Sales@SolarMade.com Web Site: Solar Made JSS Kit Includes solar electric panel (3 Volts @ 3 watts), electric motor with lead wires, motor mounting bracket with screws, gears for motor shaft in three sizes, and 2 alligator clips JSS-P Solar electric panel JSS-M Electric motor JSS-B/G Mounting bracket/screws and gears only JSS-ACC Accessory bag contains 2 axle shafts, 4 wheels/tires, 3 spur gear sizes

244

ANIMATION: Crystallography: Gamma Prime - TMS  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Feb 9, 2007 ... This 21-second animation demonstrates the crystal structure of gamma prime in nickel based superalloys. SOURCE: Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H....

245

Japanese suppliers in transition from domestic nuclear reactor vendors to international suppliers  

SciTech Connect

Japan is emerging as a major leader and exporter of nuclear power technology. In the 1990s, Japan has the largest and strongest nuclear power supply industry worldwide as a result of the largest domestic nuclear power plant construction program. The Japanese nuclear power supply industry has moved from dependence on foreign technology to developing, design, building, and operating its own power plants. This report describes the Japanese nuclear power supply industry and examines one supplier--the Mitsubishi group--to develop an understanding of the supply industry and its relationship to the utilities, government, and other organizations.

Forsberg, C.W.; Reich, W.J.; Rowan, W.J.

1994-06-27T23:59:59.000Z

246

Can I choose the electricity supplier where I live? - FAQ - U ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Can I choose the electricity supplier where I live? Some electric utility customers have the option to choose an alternate supplier of electricity.

247

Energy Supplier Obligations and White Certificate Schemes: Comparative  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Energy Supplier Obligations and White Certificate Schemes: Comparative Energy Supplier Obligations and White Certificate Schemes: Comparative Analysis of Results in the European Union Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Energy Supplier Obligations and White Certificate Schemes: Comparative Analysis of Results in the European Union Focus Area: Energy Efficiency Topics: Socio-Economic Website: eec.ucdavis.edu/ACEEE/2010/data/papers/2178.pdf Equivalent URI: cleanenergysolutions.org/content/energy-supplier-obligations-and-white Language: English Policies: "Regulations,Financial Incentives" is not in the list of possible values (Deployment Programs, Financial Incentives, Regulations) for this property. Regulations: Mandates/Targets This paper examines the ways different European Union (EU) member states,

248

Building a framework for determining the optimal supplier shipping performance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Most companies aim for perfect on-time delivery from suppliers, since late deliveries can cause supply disruptions and raise the cost of inventory, transportation and coordination. But this assumes that companies do not ...

Hurd, Maximilian L. (Maximilian Lawrence)

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

249

Improved supplier selection and cost management for globalized automotive production  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

For many manufacturing and automotive companies, traditional sourcing decisions rely on total landed cost models to determine the cheapest supplier. Total landed cost models calculate the cost to purchase a part plus all ...

Franken, Joseph P., II (Joseph Philip)

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

Outsourcing: Pressure on Suppliers to Expand Services and Lower ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As the trend for original-equipment manufacturers (OEMs) is to outsource as many ... The demand for expanded (and lower cost) service from suppliers is ... cut lost-time accidents, speed throughput and deliveries, save on energy costs, and so...

251

Data Compression with Prime Numbers  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A compression algorithm is presented that uses the set of prime numbers. Sequences of numbers are correlated with the prime numbers, and labeled with the integers. The algorithm can be iterated on data sets, generating factors of doubles on the compression.

Gordon Chalmers

2005-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

252

untitled  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to YTD '11: -4.8% * Calculated on a per day basis. Prime Supplier Report February 2011 Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, February 2011 2 Measurement of...

253

Supplier selection and performance evaluation in just-in-time production environments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this paper is to aid just-in-time (JIT) manufacturers in selecting the most appropriate suppliers and in evaluating supplier performance. Many manufacturers employ the JIT philosophy in order to be more competitive in today's global market. ... Keywords: Just-in-time production, Neural network, Supplier performance evaluation, Supplier selection

Asl? Aksoy; Nursel ztrk

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

Product Guide Product Guide Volumes Category Prices Table Crude...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 20,47 prime suppliers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 49...

255

" by Type of Supplier, Census Region, Census Division, Industry Group,"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3. Average Prices of Purchased Electricity and Steam" 3. Average Prices of Purchased Electricity and Steam" " by Type of Supplier, Census Region, Census Division, Industry Group," " and Selected Industries, 1994" " (Estimates in Dollars per Physical Units)" ,," Electricity",," Steam" ,," (kWh)",," (million Btu)" ,,,,,,"RSE" "SIC",,"Utility","Nonutility","Utility","Nonutility","Row" "Code(a)","Industry Group and Industry","Supplier(b)","Supplier(c)","Supplier(b)","Supplier(c)","Factors"

256

" of Supplier, Census Region, Census Division, and Economic Characteristics"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Quantity of Purchased Electricity and Steam by Type" Quantity of Purchased Electricity and Steam by Type" " of Supplier, Census Region, Census Division, and Economic Characteristics" " of the Establishment, 1994" " (Estimates in Btu or Physical Units)" ," Electricity",," Steam" ," (million kWh)",," (billion Btu)" ,,,,,"RSE" " ","Utility","Nonutility","Utility","Nonutility","Row" "Economic Characteristics(a)","Supplier(b)","Supplier(c)","Supplier(b)","Supplier(c)","Factors"

257

Local Suppliers, Local Jobs: Sitting Down with Matthew Coapman | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Local Suppliers, Local Jobs: Sitting Down with Matthew Coapman Local Suppliers, Local Jobs: Sitting Down with Matthew Coapman Local Suppliers, Local Jobs: Sitting Down with Matthew Coapman July 30, 2010 - 10:51am Addthis Joshua DeLung Matthew Coapman sat behind a computer for six years after college, selling advertising space across the country for major brands. When his company starting shutting down, he wasn't defeated - he saw an opportunity to reinvent himself and help his community as well. Changing Charlotte "I realized the biggest need in our community was energy conservation in the places we live and work," says Coapman, now two years into starting his business - Energy Tight. "I knew it would take getting dirty to do it, but having an experience with customers where we can give them a combination of comfort and value in their homes makes it worth it."

258

Local Suppliers, Local Jobs: Sitting Down with Matthew Coapman | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Local Suppliers, Local Jobs: Sitting Down with Matthew Coapman Local Suppliers, Local Jobs: Sitting Down with Matthew Coapman Local Suppliers, Local Jobs: Sitting Down with Matthew Coapman July 30, 2010 - 10:51am Addthis Joshua DeLung Matthew Coapman sat behind a computer for six years after college, selling advertising space across the country for major brands. When his company starting shutting down, he wasn't defeated - he saw an opportunity to reinvent himself and help his community as well. Changing Charlotte "I realized the biggest need in our community was energy conservation in the places we live and work," says Coapman, now two years into starting his business - Energy Tight. "I knew it would take getting dirty to do it, but having an experience with customers where we can give them a combination of comfort and value in their homes makes it worth it."

259

Evaluating Offshore IT Outsourcing in India: Supplier and Customer Scenarios  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This paper presents the findings from an ongoing research study on offshore IT outsourcing. Field work was carried out in India and in the UK to evaluate the scale and scope of outsourcing activities. CEOs and CIOs were interviewed in fifteen supplier firms in India and two customer firms in UK, about strategic positioning in the offshore outsourcing market; benefits and risks from outsourcing; and other demand and supply-side issues. The findings suggest that, though offshore outsourcing offers new business opportunities for IT suppliers, much of the outsourced work continues to be low risk and low value. The challenge for outsourcing suppliers is therefore to devise strategies to move from body-shopping work to low cost, high value contracts, without incurring additional risk. 1.

Naureen Khan; Wendy L. Currie; Vishanth Weerakkody; Bhavini Desai

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

260

Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling: A review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

With globalization and the emergence of the extended enterprise of interdependent organizations, there has been a steady increase in the outsourcing of parts and services. This has led firms to give more importance to the purchasing function and its ... Keywords: Auctions, Decision models, Order sizing, Outsourcing, Purchasing, Supplier selection

Najla Aissaoui; Mohamed Haouari; Elkafi Hassini

2007-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Guidelines for Performance-Based Supplier Audits (NCIG-16)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Performance-based audits offer utilities a means of increasing confidence in supplier controls and ensuring that products received will perform their intended functions. This document, the sixteenth in a series cosponsored with NCIG, provides guidelines for undertaking performance-based audits.

1990-06-04T23:59:59.000Z

262

Supplier relationship management best practices applied to the manufacture of a helicopter airframe in China  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Sikorsky's recently begun program to manufacture the S-76 helicopter airframe at a supplier in China is examined as a case study of supplier relationship management. Best practices and key principles from the literature ...

King, R. Jon (Ralph Jon)

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

263

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\historical\2006\10\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar '07 to Apr '07: -5.5% Mar '07 to Apr '07: -5.5% Apr '06 to Apr '07: +7.6% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +7.6% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '07 to Apr '07: +2.4% Apr '06 to Apr '07: +34.5% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +16.8% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '07 to Apr '07: +2.2% Apr '06 to Apr '07: +3.1% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +1.0% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Mar '07 to Apr '07: -0.4% Apr '06 to Apr '07: -0.8% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.7%

264

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\historical\2006\10\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

May '07 to Jun '07: -2.9% May '07 to Jun '07: -2.9% Jun '06 to Jun '07: +3.3% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +6.7% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '07 to Jun '07: -7.4% Jun '06 to Jun '07: +8.5% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +16.2% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '07 to Jun '07: +6.4% Jun '06 to Jun '07: +3.3% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +1.6% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* May '07 to Jun '07: +1.2% Jun '06 to Jun '07: +0.1% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.7%

265

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\historical\2006\10\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr '07 to May '07: +0.3% Apr '07 to May '07: +0.3% May '06 to May '07: +6.3% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +7.3% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '07 to May '07: -6.7% May '06 to May '07: +17.6% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +16.9% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '07 to May '07: -1.0% May '06 to May '07: +2.5% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +1.3% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Apr '07 to May '07: +2.8% May '06 to May '07: +1.3% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.8%

266

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\historical\2006\10\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jul '07 to Aug '07: +8.9% Jul '07 to Aug '07: +8.9% Aug '06 to Aug '07: +1.6% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +2.2% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '07 to Aug '07: +3.9% Aug '06 to Aug '07 -3.7% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +8.7% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '07 to Aug '07: +3.8% Aug '06 to Aug '07: +2.9% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +2.0% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jul '07 to Aug '07: +2.5% Aug '06 to Aug '07: -0.1% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +0.4%

267

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\historical\2006\10\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Aug '07 to Sep '07: -4.5% Aug '07 to Sep '07: -4.5% Sep '06 to Sep '07: +1.0% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +2.1% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '07 to Sep '07: -6.6% Sep '06 to Sep '07 -0.9% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +7.4% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '07 to Sep '07: -6.4% Sep '06 to Sep '07: +0.0% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +1.7% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Aug '07 to Sep '07: -4.2% Sep '06 to Sep '07: -0.3%

268

O:\Data_Publication\Prime Supplier Report\historical\2006\10\ventura\c007.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jun '07 to Jul '07: -4.6% Jun '07 to Jul '07: -4.6% Jul '06 to Jul '07: -0.2% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +2.3% U.S. Residual Fuel Sales 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '07 to Jul '07: +0.4% Jul '06 to Jul '07: -1.5% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +10.7% U.S. Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Sales 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '07 to Jul '07: -2.8% Jul '06 to Jul '07: +2.8% YTD '06 to YTD '07: +1.8% U.S. Motor Gasoline Sales 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions of Gallons 2005 2006 2007 Adjusted Growth Rates* Jun '07 to Jul '07: -2.1% Jul '06 to Jul '07: -0.6%

269

Multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection using achievement scalarizing functions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper, an integration of Analytic Network Process (ANP) and achievement scalarizing functions is proposed to choose the best suppliers and define the optimum quantities among the selected suppliers by considering tangible-intangible criteria ... Keywords: Achievement scalarizing functions, Analytic network process, Goal programming, Lot-sizing with supplier selection, Multi-criteria decision making

Ozden Ustun; Ezgi Aktar Demirtas

2008-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During recent years, how to determine suitable suppliers in the supply chain has become a key strategic consideration. However, the nature of supplier selection is a complex multi-criteria problem including both quantitative and qualitative factors which ... Keywords: Fuzzy set, Supplier selection, VIKOR

Amir Sanayei; S. Farid Mousavi; A. Yazdankhah

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

271

Improved VIKOR Algorithm Based on AHP and Shannon Entropy in the Selection of Thermal Power Enterprise's Coal Suppliers  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In order to select the thermal power enterprises coal suppliers properly, certain attributes of the suppliers should be carefully analysis. Supplier selection is a multi criteria problem which multi attributions of the suppliers should be considered. ... Keywords: thermal power, VIKOR, Shannon Entropy, AHP

Ma Lihong; Zhang Yanping; Zhao Zhiwei

2008-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

Sandia National Laboratories Supplier Quality Requirements for Build to  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Supplier Quality Requirements for Build to Supplier Quality Requirements for Build to Print Hardware Purchases Subject: First Release:SNL-5-2002, Issue A, 05/16/02 Revised this 18th day'ofNovember, 2004 as F-42(QP-28)04* . Revised By: 11)' I(.~ 't:t' AntOnIO J. ~ora, 14133 14133 Manager ~ c-. m I ~~ <.:-, lL 10252 Manager? \"\\_- - II - 2.3 - 0 'i ~e~7 1 025 8 Manager$::~ R (/.tff7 J Frank A. Villareal Approved By: * The revision of the document in effect at tlte tinre of award of Purchase Order of Subcontract unless otherwise noted on the Procurement Document. F-42(QP-28)O4 Quality Assurance Supplement to Sandia Contracts and Purchase Orders (- rr -°1 I 11/18/04 1.0 Scope: The scope of this document is designed to establish a level of quality for purchases and hardware procured in the form of built to print items,

273

Procedure for matching synfuel users with potential suppliers. Final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A procedure has been developed for matching prospective users and producers of synthetic fuels. The matching procedure, which involves a hierarchical screening process, is designed to assist OFC in: locating a supplier for a firm that wishes to obtain synthetic fuel exemption (Fuel Use Act); determining whether the fuel supplier proposed by a petitioner is technically and economically capable of meeting the petitioner's needs; and assisting the Synthetic Fuels Corporation in evaluating potential markets for synthetic fuels. Application of the screening procedure resulted in the identification of one or more candidates for supplying synthetic fuel to each of the prospective users. In this report the development of the screening procedure is described. Chapter 1 contains a detailed description of the seven screens; Chapter 2 describes the development of the hierarchical procedure for applying the screens to each synthetic fuels project; Chapter 3 describes the modification of the screening procedure for low and medium Btu gas; Chapter 4 describes the application of the procedure. Appendix A is a list of references used in developing the procedure; Appendix B is a detailed listing of proposed and ongoing synthetic fuel projects.

None

1981-09-26T23:59:59.000Z

274

Information for Use in Conducting Audits of Supplier Commercial Grade Item Dedication Programs  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has published a series of documents pertaining to commercial grade item dedication (CGID). Each of these documents was written from a licensees perspective and was intended for use by member utilities. EPRI released six of these documents as copyrighted publications in 2007, making them available to suppliers in the nuclear generation industry. Suppliers can use these documents as guidance for implementing supplier CGID programs. Recent experience conducting N...

2008-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

275

Concentration of U.S. crude oil imports among top five suppliers ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Crude oil imports from the top five foreign suppliers to the United Stateswhich in 2012 were Canada, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Venezuela, and Iraq, in that order ...

276

Screw Air Compressor 220v, Screw Air Compressor 220v Suppliers ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Source Top Quality Screw Air Compressor 220v Suppliers, screw mini air compressor 220v Companies, atlas copco screw compressor Manufacturers. Welcome. ...

277

Suspect/Counterfeit Items Information Guide for Subcontractors/Suppliers  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Counterfeiting of industrial and commercial grade items is an international problem that places worker safety, program objectives, expensive equipment, and security at risk. In order to prevent the introduction of Suspect/Counterfeit Items (S/CI), this information sheet is being made available as a guide to assist in the implementation of S/CI awareness and controls, in conjunction with subcontractor's/supplier's quality assurance programs. When it comes to counterfeit goods, including industrial materials, items, and equipment, no market is immune. Some manufactures have been known to misrepresent their products and intentionally use inferior materials and processes to manufacture substandard items, whose properties can significantly cart from established standards and specifications. These substandard items termed by the Department of Energy (DOE) as S/CI, pose immediate and potential threats to the safety of DOE and contractor workers, the public, and the environment. Failure of certain systems and processes caused by an S/CI could also have national security implications at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Nuclear Safety Rules (federal Laws), DOE Orders, and other regulations set forth requirements for DOE contractors to implement effective controls to assure that items and services meet specified requirements. This includes techniques to implement and thereby minimizing the potential threat of entry of S/CI to LANL. As a qualified supplier of goods or services to the LANL, your company will be required to establish and maintain effective controls to prevent the introduction of S/CI to LANL. This will require that your company warrant that all items (including their subassemblies, components, and parts) sold to LANL are genuine (i.e. not counterfeit), new, and unused, and conform to the requirements of the LANL purchase orders/contracts unless otherwise approved in writing to the Los Alamos National Security (LANS) contract administrator/procurements specialist.

Tessmar, Nancy D. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Salazar, Michael J. [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-09-18T23:59:59.000Z

278

A strategic model using structural equation modeling and fuzzy logic in supplier selection  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Supplier selection attained the state of paramount importance for companies in the current scenario because of increasing global competition. Improper selection of suppliers will have an adverse impact on the overall performance of the company. The number ... Keywords: Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Sensitivity analysis, Structural equation modeling (SEM)

M. Punniyamoorthy; P. Mathiyalagan; P. Parthiban

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

279

Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A concurrent engineering approach integrating analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with quality function deployment (QFD) in combination with cost factor measure (CFM) has been delineated to rank and subsequently select candidate-suppliers under multiple, ... Keywords: CFM, Decision support, Hierarchical MCDM, Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), Quality function deployment (QFD), Supplier selection

Arijit Bhattacharya; John Geraghty; Paul Young

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Integrating GSS and AHP: Experiences from Benchmarking of Buyer-Supplier Relationships  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The increasing overall global competition forces requirements for companies to improve their business performance continuously in every sector. The utilization of external resources, including a supplier network, has become one of the most critical development ... Keywords: Benchmarking, Buyer-Supplier Relationships, GSS, AHP

S. Peltola; M. Torkkeli; J. Tuimala

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Recently, resolving the problem of evaluation and ranking the potential suppliers has become as a key strategic factor for business firms. With the development of intelligent and automated information systems in the information era, the need for more ... Keywords: Entropy measure, Fuzzy logic, GMCDM, Supplier selection, Trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, VIKOR

Ali Shemshadi; Hossein Shirazi; Mehran Toreihi; M. J. Tarokh

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Despite the importance of decision-making (DM) techniques for construction of effective decision models for supplier selection, there is a lack of a systematic literature review for it. This paper provides a systematic literature review on articles published ... Keywords: Decision-making techniques, Literature review, Supplier selection, Uncertainty

Junyi Chai; James N. K. Liu; Eric W. T. Ngai

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

Your're Invited: Join Our Supplier Outreach Event on August 19th |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Your're Invited: Join Our Supplier Outreach Event on August 19th Your're Invited: Join Our Supplier Outreach Event on August 19th Your're Invited: Join Our Supplier Outreach Event on August 19th July 27, 2011 - 6:00pm Addthis On August 19, 2011, the Department of Energy will be co-sponsoring a suppliers outreach event for suppliers who wish to provide services to Service Disabled Veteran Owned Businesses. This event, Showcase Expo and MatchMaker, will be held in Washington D.C., and is co-sponsored by GovConectx. This outreach event is an excellent opportunity for companies interested in working with us to gain insights into the current and future markets for products, services, and requirements to enter or to continue to work on projects with us. Participants will also have the opportunity to interact directly with outreach and procurement personnel working for the Department

284

The prime curriculum - Clinical research training during residency  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

U C AT I O N The Prime Curriculum Clinical Research TrainingDESCRIPTION: The PRIME curriculum utilizes didactic lecture,and educators, our curriculum affords residents the

Kohlwes, R J; Shunk, R L; Avins, A; Garber, J; Bent, S; Shlipak, M G

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

Dual generalized Bernstein basis  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The generalized Bernstein basis in the space @P"n of polynomials of degree at most n, being an extension of the q-Bernstein basis introduced by Philips [Bernstein polynomials based on the q-integers, Ann. Numer. Math. 4 (1997) 511-518], is given by the ... Keywords: Bernstein basis, Big q-Jacobi polynomials, Discrete Bernstein basis, Dual basis, Generalized Bernstein basis, Little q-Jacobi polynomials, Shifted Jacobi polynomials, q -Bernstein basis

Stanis?aw Lewanowicz; Pawe? Wo?ny

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

286

The Determinants of Inter-Firm trust in Supplier-Automaker Relationships In the U.S., Japan, and Korea  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this paper we examine the determinants of supplier trust in the buyer in 453supplier-automaker relationships in the U. S., Japan, and Korea. We define trust and derive a model of its determinants drawing upon (1) an ...

Chu, Wujin

1997-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

287

Prime Solar Pty Ltd | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Prime Solar Pty Ltd Prime Solar Pty Ltd Jump to: navigation, search Name Prime Solar Pty Ltd Place Perth, Western Australia, Australia Zip 6151 Sector Solar Product Prime Solar Australia plans to manufacture polycrystalline silicon and wafers. Coordinates -31.95302°, 115.857239° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":-31.95302,"lon":115.857239,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

288

Prime Sun Power | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sun Power Jump to: navigation, search Name Prime Sun Power Place New York, New York Zip 10005 Sector Solar Product US-based company that is involved with the development of...

289

Microsoft Word - Managing Your iSupplier Profile Job Aid R12 05092012.docx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Contents of Contents Summary of Your iSupplier Profile...........................................................................................................................2 Accessing Your Account for the First Time.............................................................................................................2 Navigating to Your Profile.........................................................................................................................................3 Company Information (a.k.a. Profile Management)............................................................................................4 Organization...............................................................................................................................................................5

290

Lean Aircraft Initiative Implementation Workshop #3: Customer and Supplier Integration Across the Supply Chain  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The integration of customers and suppliers along the supply chain involves a fundamental transformation of the way business is conducted in the Aerospace industry. Lean Aerospace Initiative (LAI) members, as well as ...

Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel

291

Assessment of the ISO 9000 Quality Management System (QMS) Registrar Accreditation and Supplier Certification Processes  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the assessment of key processes associated with administration and implementation of the International Organization for Standardization's (ISO's) family of standards known as ISO 9000. The results of this assessment were used to develop guidance to assist utilities when dedicating commercial-grade items procured from ISO 9000 suppliers. (The resulting guidance is published in EPRI Report 1003105, "Dedicating Commercial-Grade Items Procured From ISO 9000 Suppliers.")

2001-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

292

Sahara Prime City Ltd | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sahara Prime City Ltd Sahara Prime City Ltd Jump to: navigation, search Name Sahara Prime City Ltd. Place Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India Zip 226024 Sector Solar, Wind energy Product Lucknow-based real estate firm setting up wind and solar power projects via its subsidiary Sahara India Power. Coordinates 47.495918°, -92.7388° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.495918,"lon":-92.7388,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

293

Prime BioSolutions | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Prime BioSolutions Prime BioSolutions Jump to: navigation, search Name Prime BioSolutions Place Omaha, Nebraska Zip 68137 Product Ethanol and biogas producer using the closed-loop system. Coordinates 33.180954°, -94.743294° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":33.180954,"lon":-94.743294,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

294

lattice basis - CECM  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Discover an identity using lattice basis reduction. Find integers a and b such that a*Zeta(50)+b*Pi^50 = 0 using lattice basis reduction . First try using quadruple...

295

Distribution of Primes and of Interval Prime Pairs Based on $?$ Function  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

$\\Theta$ function is defined based upon Kronecher symbol. In light of the principle of inclusion-exclusion, $\\Theta$ function of sine function is used to denote the distribution of composites and primes. The structure of Goldbach Conjecture has been analyzed, and $\\Xi$ function is brought forward by the linear diophantine equation; by relating to $\\Theta$ function, the interval distribution of composite pairs and prime pairs (i.e. the Goldbach Conjecture) is thus obtained. In the end, Abel's Theorem (Multiplication of Series) is used to discuss the lower limit of the distribution of the interval prime pairs.

Yifang Fan; Zhiyu Li

2010-04-19T23:59:59.000Z

296

Method for priming and DNA sequencing  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A method is presented for improving the priming specificity of an oligonucleotide primer that is non-unique in a nucleic acid template which includes selecting a continuous stretch of several nucleotides in the template DNA where one of the four bases does not occur in the stretch. This also includes bringing the template DNA in contract with a non-unique primer partially or fully complimentary to the sequence immediately upstream of the selected sequence stretch. This results in polymerase-mediated differential extension of the primer in the presence of a subset of deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates that does not contain the base complementary to the base absent in the selected sequence stretch. These reactions occur at a temperature sufficiently low for allowing the extension of the non-unique primer. The method causes polymerase-mediated extension reactions in the presence of all four natural deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates or modifications. At this high temperature discrimination occurs against priming sites of the non-unique primer where the differential extension has not made the primer sufficiently stable to prime. However, the primer extended at the selected stretch is sufficiently stable to prime.

Mugasimangalam, R.C.; Ulanovsky, L.E.

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

untitled  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,4 3,5,45 prime suppliers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 49...

298

X:\\L6046\\Data_Publication\\Pma\\current\\ventura\\pma.vp  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,4 3,5,45 prime suppliers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 49...

299

Energy Information Administration/Petroleum Marketing Annual  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,4 3,5,45 prime suppliers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 49...

300

X:\\Data_Publication\\Pma\\current\\ventura\\pma00.vp  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,4 3,5,45 prime suppliers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 49...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Two stroke homogenous charge compression ignition engine with pulsed air supplier  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A two stroke homogenous charge compression ignition engine includes a volume pulsed air supplier, such as a piston driven pump, for efficient scavenging. The usage of a homogenous charge tends to decrease emissions. The use of a volume pulsed air supplier in conjunction with conventional poppet type intake and exhaust valves results in a relatively efficient scavenging mode for the engine. The engine preferably includes features that permit valving event timing, air pulse event timing and injection event timing to be varied relative to engine crankshaft angle. The principle use of the invention lies in improving diesel engines.

Clarke, John M. (Chillicothe, IL)

2003-08-05T23:59:59.000Z

302

A process for the agile product realization of electromechanical devices (A-primed)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper describes a product realization process developed at Sandia National Laboratories by the A-PRIMED project that integrates many of the key components of ``agile manufacturing`` (Nagel & Dove, 1992) into a complete, step-by-step, design-to-production process. For two separate product realization efforts, each geared to a different set of requirements, A-PRIMED demonstrated product realization of a custom device in less than a month. A-PRIMED used a discriminator (a precision electro mechanical device) as the demonstration device, but the process is readily adaptable to other electro mechanical products. The process begins with a qualified design parameter space (Diegert et al, 1995). From that point, the product realization process encompasses all facets of requirements development, analysis and testing, design, manufacturing, robot assembly and quality assurance, as well as product data management and concurrent engineering. In developing the product realization process, A-PRIMED employed an iterative approach whereby after each build, the process was reviewed and refinements were made on the basis of lessons learned. This paper describes the integration of project functions and product realization technologies to develop a product realization process that on repeated iterations, was proven successful.

Forsythe, C.; Ashby, M.R.; Benavides, G.L.; Diegert, K.V.; Jones, R.E.; Longcope, D.B.; Parratt, S.W.

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

303

Beyond Design Basis Events  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Beyond Design Basis Events Beyond Design Basis Events Following the March 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant accident in Japan, DOE embarked upon several initiatives to investigate the safety posture of its nuclear facilities relative to beyond design basis events (BDBEs). These initiatives included issuing Safety Bulletin 2011-01, Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis, and conducting two DOE nuclear safety workshops. DOE also issued two reports documenting the results of these initiatives: Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to BDBEs, August 2011, and Report to the Secretary of Energy on Beyond Design Basis Event Pilot Evaluations, Results and Recommendations for Improvements to Enhance Nuclear Safety at DOE Nuclear Facilities, January 2013.

304

About the logic of the prime number distribution  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

There are two basic number sequences which play a major role in the prime number distribution. The first Number Sequence SQ1 contains all prime numbers of the form 6n+5 and the second Number Sequence SQ2 contains all prime numbers of the form 6n+1. All existing prime numbers seem to be contained in these two number sequences, except of the prime numbers 2 and 3. Riemanns Zeta Function also seems to indicate, that there is a logical connection between the mentioned number sequences and the distribution of prime numbers. This connection is indicated by lines in the diagram of the Zeta Function, which are formed by the points s where the Zeta Function is real. Another key role in the distribution of the prime numbers plays the number 5 and its periodic occurrence in the two number sequences SQ1 and SQ2. All non-prime numbers in SQ1 and SQ2 are caused by recurrences of these two number sequences with increasing wave-lengths in themselves, in a similar fashion as Overtones (harmonics) or Undertones derive from a fundamental frequency. On the contrary prime numbers represent spots in these two basic Number Sequences SQ1 and SQ2 where there is no interference caused by these recurring number sequences. The distribution of the non-prime numbers and prime numbers can be described in a graphical way with a -Wave Model- (or Interference Model) -- see Table 2.

Harry K. Hahn

2008-01-28T23:59:59.000Z

305

Safety Basis Report  

SciTech Connect

As part of the internal Integrated Safety Management Assessment verification process, it was determined that there was a lack of documentation that summarizes the safety basis of the current Yucca Mountain Project (YMP) site characterization activities. It was noted that a safety basis would make it possible to establish a technically justifiable graded approach to the implementation of the requirements identified in the Standards/Requirements Identification Document. The Standards/Requirements Identification Documents commit a facility to compliance with specific requirements and, together with the hazard baseline documentation, provide a technical basis for ensuring that the public and workers are protected. This Safety Basis Report has been developed to establish and document the safety basis of the current site characterization activities, establish and document the hazard baseline, and provide the technical basis for identifying structures, systems, and components (SSCs) that perform functions necessary to protect the public, the worker, and the environment from hazards unique to the YMP site characterization activities. This technical basis for identifying SSCs serves as a grading process for the implementation of programs such as Conduct of Operations (DOE Order 5480.19) and the Suspect/Counterfeit Items Program. In addition, this report provides a consolidated summary of the hazards analyses processes developed to support the design, construction, and operation of the YMP site characterization facilities and, therefore, provides a tool for evaluating the safety impacts of changes to the design and operation of the YMP site characterization activities.

R.J. Garrett

2002-01-14T23:59:59.000Z

306

Extracting performance rules of suppliers in the manufacturing industry: an empirical study  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Performance evaluation of suppliers is increasingly recognized as a critical indicator in supply chain cooperation. Traditional performance evaluation methods have the problems of a simple buy/sell relation and in one's subjective views between manufacturers ... Keywords: Data mining techniques, KPI (Key Performance Indicators), Manufacturing industry, Performance evaluation, SCM (Supply Chain Management)

You-Shyang Chen; Ching-Hsue Cheng; Chien-Jung Lai

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

307

Equipment/product classification. [Equipment suppliers for the oil and gas industry  

SciTech Connect

This article contains information about the manufacturers and suppliers of goods for the oil and gas industry, including machines, software, services, and equipment used to build, operate, and maintain energy pipeline systems. The article represents companies around the world and are arranged by product category for ease of use.

Not Available

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Environmental sustainability of a supply chain depends on the purchasing strategy of the supply chain members. Most of the earlier models have focused on cost, quality, lead time, etc. issues but not given enough importance to carbon emission for supplier ... Keywords: Carbon emission, Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy multi-objective linear programming, Green house gas, Supplier selection, Textile supply chain

Krishnendu Shaw; Ravi Shankar; Surendra S. Yadav; Lakshman S. Thakur

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

309

Nuclear Facility Safety Basis  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Basis Safety Basis FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: A fully compliant Nuclear Facility Safety Basis. Program is implemented and maintained across the site. REQUIREMENTS:  10 CFR 830 Subpart B Guidance:  DOE STD 3009  DOE STD 1104  DOE STD  DOE G 421.1-2 Implementation Guide For Use in Developing Documented Safety Analyses To Meet Subpart B Of 10 CFR 830  DOE G 423.1-1 Implementation Guide For Use In Developing Technical Safety Requirements  DOE G 424.1-1 Implementation Guide For Use In Addressing Unreviewed Safety Question Requirements Performance Objective 1: Contractor Program Documentation The site contractor has developed an up-to-date, comprehensive, compliant, documented nuclear facility safety basis and associated implementing mechanisms and procedures for all required nuclear facilities and activities (10 CFR

310

SNS backscattering spectrometer, BASIS  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We describe the design and current performance of the backscattering silicon spectrometer (BASIS), a time-of-flight backscattering spectrometer built at the spallation neutron source (SNS) of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). BASIS is the first silicon-based backscattering spectrometer installed at a spallation neutron source. In addition to high intensity, it offers a high-energy resolution of about 3.5 {mu}eV and a large and variable energy transfer range. These ensure an excellent overlap with the dynamic ranges accessible at other inelastic spectrometers at the SNS.

Mamontov, Eugene [ORNL; Herwig, Kenneth W [ORNL

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

Evolution of Different Generations of Gamma Prime Precipitates in a ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Depending on the cooling rate, either a single or multiple bursts of gamma prime .... in Metal Matrix Composites by In situ X-ray Synchrotron Tomography.

312

Microstructural Evolution of Different Generations of Gamma Prime ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Depending on the cooling rate, either a single or multiple bursts of gamma prime .... Non-Destructive High Energy X-Ray Diffraction Microscopy Studies of Bulk...

313

Three Theorems on modular sieves that suggest the Prime Difference is O(Number of primes n)^1/2))  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This 1964 paper developed as an off-shoot to the foundational query: Do we discover the natural numbers (Platonically), or do we construct them linguistically? The paper also assumes computational significance in the light of Agrawal, Kayal and Saxena's August 2000 paper, "PRIMES is in P", since both the TRIM and Compact Number Generating algorithms - each of which generates all the primes - are deterministic algorithms that run in polynomial time and suggest that the Prime Difference, d(n), is O(Number of primes n)^1/2)).

Bhupinder Singh Anand

2005-12-26T23:59:59.000Z

314

Advanced Nuclear Technology: Supplier Quality Management for New Nuclear Plant Construction Projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides guidance for new nuclear power plant construction projects on supplier quality-related risks associated with the procurement of materials, equipment, and services intended for use in a safety-related plant application. This guidance takes an in-depth look into the procurement-related challenges that new construction projects face and at measures for overcoming these challenges. A methodology is provided for identifying, managing, evaluating, and mitigating quality-related risks ...

2013-06-26T23:59:59.000Z

315

Supply Side Management Kit: Service for Energy Suppliers and Process Industry Customers  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Supply Side Management Kit highlights proposed EPRI's services for energy suppliers and process industries in the supply side area. With the onset of electricity deregulation, process industry customers are increasingly looking at reducing energy costs on the supply of energy. The new environment has created significant opportunities for cost-effective purchase, management, generation, utilization, and sale of energy for process industries. This kit discusses the services offered by EPRI to meet its ...

1999-10-28T23:59:59.000Z

316

Prime Solar Senergy SL | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Solar Senergy SL Solar Senergy SL Jump to: navigation, search Name Prime Solar Senergy SL Place Barcelona, Spain Zip 8021 Product Spanish project developer; obtains regulatory approvals and certifications in the European markets. Coordinates 41.385589°, 2.168745° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":41.385589,"lon":2.168745,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

317

Emulsion based cast booster - a priming system  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper explores the potential of emulsion based cast booster to be used as primer to initiate bulk delivered emulsion explosives used in mines. An attempt has been made for comparative study between conventional cast booster and emulsion based cast booster in terms of the initiation process developed and their capability to develop and maintain the stable detonation process in the column explosives. The study has been conducted using a continuous velocity of detonation (VOD) measuring instrument. During this study three blasts have been monitored. In each blast two holes have been selected for study, the first hole being initiated with conventional cast booster while the other one with emulsion based cast booster. The findings of the study advocates that emulsion based cast booster is capable of efficient priming of bulk delivered column explosive with stable detonation process in the column. Further, the booster had advantages over the conventional PETN/TNT based cast booster. 5 refs., 2 figs., 1 tab., 1 photo.

Gupta, R.N.; Mishra, A.K. [National Institute of Rock Mechanics, KGF (India)

2005-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

318

On SIC-POVMs in Prime Dimensions  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The generalized Pauli group and its normalizer, the Clifford group, have a rich mathematical structure which is relevant to the problem of constructing symmetric informationally complete POVMs (SIC-POVMs). To date, almost every known SIC-POVM fiducial vector is an eigenstate of a "canonical" unitary in the Clifford group. I show that every canonical unitary in prime dimensions p > 3 lies in the same conjugacy class of the Clifford group and give a class representative for all such dimensions. It follows that if even one such SIC-POVM fiducial vector is an eigenvector of such a unitary, then all of them are (for a given such dimension). I also conjecture that in all dimensions d, the number of conjugacy classes is bounded above by 3 and depends only on d mod 9, and I support this claim with computer computations in all dimensions < 48.

Steven T. Flammia

2006-05-04T23:59:59.000Z

319

Some blasthole priming methods can double your costs  

SciTech Connect

This article discusses the effect of priming on total energy release in blasting operations. The authors give and example of how poor priming and its effects can create losses of millions of dollars per year for some operations. The article explains how to choose a primer that is economical and efficient.

Konya, C.J.; Lukovic, S.S.

1987-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

320

Electromagnetic Priming of Ceramic Foam Filters (CFF) for Liquid ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Mark William Kennedy, Shahid Akhtar, Jon Arne Bakken, Ragnhild Elisabeth Aune ... using magnetic field strengths of 0.06-0.2T, for periods of 1-10 minutes. ... obtained for 50 PPI magnetically primed, than for 30 PPI gravity primed filters.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

A Few Equivalences of Wall-Sun-Sun Prime Conjecture  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this paper, we prove a few lemmas concerning Fibonacci numbers modulo primes and provide a few statements that are equivalent to Wall-Sun-Sun Prime Conjecture. Further, we investigate the conjecture through heuristic arguments and propose a few additional conjectures for future research.

Saha, Arpan

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

A MULTIPLE-ITEM MULTIPLE-CONSTRAINT INVENTORY OPTIMIZATION AND SUPPLIER SELECTION MODEL UNDER LEAD TIME DEMAND UNCERTAINTY.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??The objective of this thesis is to solve a multiple-item, one-retailer inventory control and supplier selection problem with multiple constraints and uncertainties. For each item, (more)

Zhu, Rongjia

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

Radioactive Waste Management Basis  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Radioactive Waste Management Basis is to describe the systematic approach for planning, executing, and evaluating the management of radioactive waste at LLNL. The implementation of this document will ensure that waste management activities at LLNL are conducted in compliance with the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, and the Implementation Guide for DOE Manual 435.1-1, Radioactive Waste Management Manual. Technical justification is provided where methods for meeting the requirements of DOE Order 435.1 deviate from the DOE Manual 435.1-1 and Implementation Guide.

Perkins, B K

2009-06-03T23:59:59.000Z

324

V-014: Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager JBoss RMI Services...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4: Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager JBoss RMI Services Let Remote Users Execute Arbitrary Commands V-014: Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager JBoss RMI Services Let...

325

New conjectures in number theory - The distribution of prime numbers  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Since the mathematicians of ancient Greece until Fermat, since Gauss until today; the way how the primes along the numerical straight line are distributed has become perhaps the most difficult math problem; many people believe that their distribution is chaotic, governed only by the laws of chance. In this article the author tries to resolve satisfactorily all matter related to the distance between primes, based on the determination of a lower bound for the primes counting function, the estimate of Legendre's conjecture, and the iterative method for solving equations.

Jonas Castillo Toloza

2013-04-18T23:59:59.000Z

326

Extrapolating ([ital e],[ital e][prime][ital p]) to ([ital e],[ital e][prime])  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Unexplained anomalies in quasielastic ([ital e],[ital e][prime]) measurements motivated ([ital e],[ital e][prime][ital p]) experiments to determine the reaction mechanisms (single-nucleon knockout, multinucleon knockout, delta production, etc.) involved in quasielastic electron scattering. In this paper we use various models to extrapolate from C([ital e],[ital e][prime][ital p]) measurements, where an outgoing proton is detected in a small solid angle centered around the virtual photon angle, to C([ital e],[ital e][prime]) measurements, which integrate over all knockedout particles at all angles. Extrapolated single nucleon knockout ([ital p] and [ital s] shell) only accounts for 25% of the ([ital e],[ital e][prime]) cross section in the dip region and only 40--60 % in the quasielastic region. This indicates that the quasielastic'' region has a large nonquasielastic component. Various multinucleon knockout models (two-nucleon correlations, six-quark bags, and qualitative final state rescattering) are compared to C([ital e],[ital e][prime][ital p]) missing energy spectra and to the difference between the ([ital e],[ital e][prime]) cross section and the extrapolated single-nucleon knockout; none completely describe the data.

Weinstein, L.B. (Department of Physics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529 (United States)); Warren, G.A. (Department of Physics, Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (United States))

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Walton EMC - Prime PowerLoan Program | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Walton EMC - Prime PowerLoan Program Walton EMC - Prime PowerLoan Program Walton EMC - Prime PowerLoan Program < Back Eligibility Commercial Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Sealing Your Home Design & Remodeling Windows, Doors, & Skylights Ventilation Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Water Heating Maximum Rebate $5,500 Program Info State Georgia Program Type Utility Loan Program Rebate Amount up to $5,500 Provider Walton Electric Membership Corporation Walton Electric Membership Corporation (EMC) is an electric cooperative that serves 100,000 customers in ten northeastern Georgia counties. Walton EMC offers the Prime PowerLoan program for both residential and commercial accounts. Customers with good utility payment record, credit application,

329

HYPERPERFECT NUMBERS WITH FIVE AND SIX DIFFERENT PRIME FACTORS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A natural number N is hyperperfect if there exists an integer k such that N ?1 = k[?(N)? N ? 1], where ?(N) is the sum of the positive divisors of N. The classical perfect numbers are hyperperfect numbers corresponding to k = 1. In this paper we exhibit several hyperperfect numbers with five different prime factors and the first known hyperperfect number with six different prime factors. A natural number N is said to be hyperperfect if there exists an integer k such that N ? 1 = k[?(N) ? N ? 1], where ?(N) is the sum of the positive divisors of N. The ordinary perfect numbers, for which ?(N) = 2 N, correspond to the case where k = 1. Hyperperfect numbers have been studied by Minoli [2], [3], [4], Bear [2], te Riele [6], [7], [8], McCranie, [1], and Nash [5]. Several examples have been found of hyperperfect numbers with two, three and four different prime factors and one such number with five different prime factors was discovered be te Riele [8]. In this paper we include some new hyperperfect numbers with five different prime factors and the first known example with six different prime factors as well. These numbers were

Mariano Garcia

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Procedure for matching synfuel users with potential suppliers. Appendix B. Proposed and ongoing synthetic fuel production projects  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

To assist the Department of Energy, Office of Fuels Conversion (OFC), in implementing the synthetic fuel exemption under the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act (FUA) of 1978, Resource Consulting Group, Inc. (RCG), has developed a procedure for matching prospective users and producers of synthetic fuel. The matching procedure, which involves a hierarchical screening process, is designed to assist OFC in: locating a supplier for a firm that wishes to obtain a synthetic fuel exemption; determining whether the fuel supplier proposed by a petitioner is technically and economically capable of meeting the petitioner's needs; and assisting the Synthetic Fuels Corporation or a synthetic fuel supplier in evaluating potential markets for synthetic fuel production. A data base is provided in this appendix on proposed and ongoing synthetic fuel production projects to be used in applying the screening procedure. The data base encompasses a total of 212 projects in the seven production technologies.

None

1981-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

331

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Aug '12: 10.3% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -5.4% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, August 2012 Measurement of Petroleum...

332

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

'11 to Sep '12: 5.7% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -4.3% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, September 2012 Measurement of...

333

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

'12 to May '13: 8.1% YTD '12 to YTD '13: 25.8% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, May 2013 Measurement of Petroleum...

334

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Dec '11: -17.6% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -2.8% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, December 2011 Measurement of...

335

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Jul '12: 10.2% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -7.5% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, July 2012 Measurement of Petroleum...

336

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to May '12: 3.5% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -10.7% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, May 2012 Measurement of Petroleum...

337

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Feb '13: 18.1% YTD '12 to YTD '13: 22.0% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, February 2013 Measurement of...

338

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Jan '12: -18.8% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -18.8% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, January 2012 Measurement of...

339

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

'12 to Jun '13: 7.1% YTD '12 to YTD '13: 23.4% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, June 2013 Measurement of Petroleum...

340

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Apr '13: 43.1% YTD '12 to YTD '13: 29.3% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, April 2013 Measurement of Petroleum...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Nov'11: 2.3% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -0.6% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, November 2011 Measurement of...

342

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Feb '12: -7.4% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -13.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, February 2012 Measurement of...

343

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Mar'13: 40.1% YTD '12 to YTD '13: 26.6% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, March 2013 Measurement of Petroleum...

344

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

'11 to Dec '12: 7.3% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -0.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, December 2012 Measurement of...

345

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Jun '12: -0.1% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -9.5% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, June 2012 Measurement of Petroleum...

346

untitled  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Sep '10 to Sep '11: -1.2% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -2.6% * Calculated on a per day basis. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, September 2011 2 Measurement of...

347

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

'11 to Nov '12: 8.9% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -1.9% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, November 2012 Measurement of...

348

untitled  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jan '10 to Jan '11: -1.1% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -1.1% * Calculated on a per day basis. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, January 2011 2 Measurement of...

349

untitled  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr '10 to Apr '11: -6.3% YTD '10 to YTD '11: -6.4% * Calculated on a per day basis. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, April 2011 2 Measurement of...

350

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Mar '12: -10.0% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -12.8% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, March 2012 Measurement of Petroleum...

351

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

to Apr '12: -7.9% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -12.0% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, April 2012 Measurement of Petroleum...

352

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Millions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

'11 to Oct '12: 6.6% YTD '11 to YTD '12: -3.1% * Calculated on a per day basis. 2 U.S. Energy Information AdministrationPrime Supplier Report, October 2012 Measurement of...

353

Comparison of Prime Movers Suitable for USMC Expeditionary Power Sources  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the results of the ORNL investigation into prime movers that would be desirable for the construction of a power system suitable for the United States Marine Corps (USMC) expeditionary forces under Operational Maneuvers From The Sea (OMFTS) doctrine. Discrete power levels of {approx}1, 5, 15, and 30 kW are considered. The only requirement is that the prime mover consumes diesel fuel. A brief description is given for the prime movers to describe their basic scientific foundations and relative advantages and disadvantages. A list of key attributes developed by ORNL has been weighted by the USMC to indicate the level of importance. A total of 14 different prime movers were scored by ORNL personnel in four size ranges (1,5, 15, & 30 kW) for their relative strength in each attribute area. The resulting weighted analysis was used to indicate which prime movers are likely to be suitable for USMC needs. No single engine or prime mover emerged as the clear-cut favorite but several engines scored as well or better than the diesel engine. At the higher load levels (15 & 30 kW), the results indicate that the open Brayton (gas turbine) is a relatively mature technology and likely a suitable choice to meet USMC needs. At the lower power levels, the situation is more difficult and the market alone is not likely to provide an optimum solution in the time frame desired (2010). Several prime movers should be considered for future developments and may be satisfactory; specifically, the Atkinson cycle, the open Brayton cycle (gas turbine), the 2-stroke diesel. The rotary diesel and the solid oxide fuel cell should be backup candidates. Of all these prime movers, the Atkinson cycle may well be the most suitable for this application but is an immature technology. Additional demonstrations of this engine will be conducted at ORNL. If this analysis is positive, then the performance of a generator set using this engine, the open Brayton and the 2-stroke diesel should be estimated to evaluate its potential suitability for expeditionary forces. The overriding conclusion of this effort is that we feel a suitable prime mover can be found but that the development will be technically challenging and trade-offs will be made before an optimum solution is found.

Theiss, T.J.

2000-04-18T23:59:59.000Z

354

PrimeStar Solar Inc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PrimeStar Solar Inc PrimeStar Solar Inc Jump to: navigation, search Name PrimeStar Solar Inc Place Longmont, Colorado Zip 80504 Product Intends to produce CdTe thin film PV modules using technology licensed by the NREL. Coordinates 40.16394°, -105.100504° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":40.16394,"lon":-105.100504,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

355

Property:Distributed Generation Prime Mover | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Property Property Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Property:Distributed Generation Prime Mover Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Distributed Generation Prime Mover Property Type Page Description Make and model of power sources. Pages using the property "Distributed Generation Prime Mover" Showing 22 pages using this property. D Distributed Generation Study/10 West 66th Street Corp + Ingersoll Rand I-R PowerWorks 70 + Distributed Generation Study/615 kW Waukesha Packaged System + Waukesha VGF 36GLD + Distributed Generation Study/Aisin Seiki G60 at Hooligans Bar and Grille + Aisin Seiki G60 + Distributed Generation Study/Arrow Linen + Coast Intelligen 150-IC with ECS + Distributed Generation Study/Dakota Station (Minnegasco) + Capstone C30 +

356

Microsoft Word - PRIME FULL Report 4-12-02.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PRIME WORKSHOP PRIME WORKSHOP A LONG-TERM E&P INITIATIVE October 23, 2001 Houston, Texas Sponsored by: National Petroleum Technology Office National Energy Technology Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy PRIME WORKSHOP Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name,

357

Mitigating the risk of information leakage in a two-level supply chain through optimal supplier selection  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Information leakage in supply chains is drawing more and more attention in supply chain management. Unlike existing research, which usually focuses on the effect of information leakage on the supply chain's material and information flow, this paper aims ... Keywords: Inference, Information leakage, Information sharing, Optimal supplier selection, Risk mitigation

Da Yong Zhang; Xinlin Cao; Lingyu Wang; Yong Zeng

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

358

The Impact of Product, Market, and Relationship Characteristics on Interorganizational System Integration in Manufacturer-Supplier Dyads  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Firms are increasingly using collaborative systems to enhance supply-chain visibility. A key emphasis of these interorganizational systems (IOS) is to improve the coordination between buyers and suppliers through electronic integration. While such IOS ... Keywords: Collaborative Systems, Electronic Integration, Interorganizational Systems, Supply Chains, Survey Research

Varun Grover; Khawaja Saeed

2007-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

To: University administrators responsible for code of conduct and licensing issues From: The Members of the Designated Suppliers Program (DSP) Working Group  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: The Members of the Designated Suppliers Program (DSP) Working Group Date: September 29, 2006 Re: Revisions to the DSP The Designated Suppliers Program (DSP) Working Group has been meeting since March of this year articulated support for the DSP and expressed a commitment to work together to move the program forward

Holsinger, Kent

360

Mixtures of truncated basis functions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper we propose a framework, called mixtures of truncated basis functions (MoTBFs), for representing general hybrid Bayesian networks. The proposed framework generalizes both the mixture of truncated exponentials (MTEs) framework and the Mixture ... Keywords: Approximations, Hybrid Bayesian networks, Inference, Mixtures of truncated basis functions, Mixtures of truncated exponentials

Helge Langseth; Thomas D. Nielsen; Rafael Rum?; Antonio Salmern

2012-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

A compact FPGA-based montgomery multiplier over prime fields  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This work describes a compact FPGA hardware architecture for computing modular multiplications over GF(p) using the Montgomery method, suitable for public key cryptography for embedded or mobile systems. The multiplier is parameterizable, allowing ... Keywords: coprocessor, finite field arithmetic, fpga, montgomery multiplication, prime fields

Miguel Morales-Sandoval; Arturo Diaz-Perez

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

On elements of prime order in Cr_2(Q)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We show that the plane Cremona group over the field of rational numbers does not contain elements of prime order $\\ge 11$. Also we prove that there is only one conjugacy class of elements of order 7 represented by an automorphism of a 2-dimensional torus constructed by J.-P. Serre.

Dolgachev, Igor V

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

363

Universal Characteristics of Fractal Fluctuations in Prime Number Distribution  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The frequency of occurrence of prime numbers at unit number spacing intervals exhibits selfsimilar fractal fluctuations concomitant with inverse power law form for power spectrum generic to dynamical systems in nature such as fluid flows, stock market fluctuations, population dynamics, etc. The physics of long-range correlations exhibited by fractals is not yet identified. A recently developed general systems theory visualises the eddy continuum underlying fractals to result from the growth of large eddies as the integrated mean of enclosed small scale eddies, thereby generating a hierarchy of eddy circulations, or an inter-connected network with associated long-range correlations. The model predictions are as follows: (i) The probability distribution and power spectrum of fractals follow the same inverse power law which is a function of the golden mean. The predicted inverse power law distribution is very close to the statistical normal distribution for fluctuations within two standard deviations from the mean of the distribution. (ii) Fractals signify quantumlike chaos since variance spectrum represents probability density distribution, a characteristic of quantum systems such as electron or photon. (ii) Fractal fluctuations of frequency distribution of prime numbers signify spontaneous organisation of underlying continuum number field into the ordered pattern of the quasiperiodic Penrose tiling pattern. The model predictions are in agreement with the probability distributions and power spectra for different sets of frequency of occurrence of prime numbers at unit number interval for successive 1000 numbers. Prime numbers in the first 10 million numbers were used for the study.

A. M. Selvam

2008-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

364

CNF and DNF Considered Harmful for Computing Prime Implicants/Implicates  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Several methods to compute the prime implicants and the prime implicates of a negation normal form (NNF) formula are developed and implemented. An algorithm PI is introduced that is an extension to negation normal form of an algorithm given by ... Keywords: dissolution, prime implicants/implicates

Anavai Ramesh; George Becker; Neil V. Murray

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

Optimal ratio between phase basis and bit basis in QKD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In the original BB84 protocol, we use the bit basis and the phase basis with the equal probability. Lo et al (J. of Cryptology, 18, 133-165 (2005)) proposed to modify the ratio between two bases for increasing the final key generation rate in the asymptotic setting. In the present letter, in order to treat this problem the non-asymptotic setting, we optimize the ratio between the two bases with exponential constraints for Eve's information distinguishability and the final error probability.

Hayashi, Masahito

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime Contractors Cite Past Year's Cleanup Progress Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime Contractors Cite Past Year's Cleanup Progress January 5, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Hardy, DOE (509) 376-5365 Cameron.Hardy@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office contractors achieved a great deal of cleanup progress at the Hanford Site in 2010. Below are just some of the major accomplishments of our River Corridor, Central Plateau, and Mission Support contractors: River Corridor To date, approximately half of the cleanup in the Hanford Site's 220-square-mile River Corridor is complete. The River Corridor cleanup

367

Property:Number of Prime Movers | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Property Property Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Property:Number of Prime Movers Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type Number. Pages using the property "Number of Prime Movers" Showing 22 pages using this property. D Distributed Generation Study/10 West 66th Street Corp + 1 + Distributed Generation Study/615 kW Waukesha Packaged System + 1 + Distributed Generation Study/Aisin Seiki G60 at Hooligans Bar and Grille + 1 + Distributed Generation Study/Arrow Linen + 2 + Distributed Generation Study/Dakota Station (Minnegasco) + 1 + Distributed Generation Study/Elgin Community College + 4 + Distributed Generation Study/Emerling Farm + 1 + Distributed Generation Study/Floyd Bennett + 2 + Distributed Generation Study/Harbec Plastics + 25 +

368

PRIME VALUE METHOD TO PRIORITIZE RISK HANDLING STRATEGIES  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Funding for implementing risk handling strategies typically is allocated according to either the risk-averse approach (the worst risk first) or the cost-effective approach (the greatest risk reduction per implementation dollar first). This paper introduces a prime value approach in which risk handling strategies are prioritized according to how nearly they meet the goals of the organization that disburses funds for risk handling. The prime value approach factors in the importance of the project in which the risk has been identified, elements of both risk-averse and cost-effective approaches, and the time period in which the risk could happen. This paper also presents a prioritizer spreadsheet, which employs weighted criteria to calculate a relative rank for the handling strategy of each risk evaluated.

Noller, D

2007-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

369

Structural basis for DNA bending  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The authors report proton NMR studies on DNA oligonucleotides that contain A tracts of lengths known to produce various degrees of bending. Spectra of duplexes in the series 5{prime}-(GGCA{sub n}CGG){center dot}(CCGT{sub n}GCC) (n = 3,4,5,7,9) reveal substantial structural changes within the A{sub n}{center dot}T{sub n} tract as its length is increased. Chemical-shift comparisons show that A tracts with fewer than about seven members do not contain regions of uniform structure. Throughout the series, there is a striking monotonic relationship between the location of an A{center dot}T pair in the A tract and the relative position of its ThyH3 resonance. The direction of this chemical-shift dispersion is opposite to that expected from consideration of ring-current effects alone. This model features a substantial negative base-pair tilt, which has been suggested previously as the source of A-tract bending. In contrast, the nuclear Overhauser effect distances are inconsistent with at least one known crystallographic A-tract structure which lacks appreciable base-pair tilt.

Nadeau, J.G.; Crothers, D.M. (Yale Univ., New Haven, CT (USA))

1989-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

370

The distribution of prime numbers on the square root spiral  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Prime Numbers clearly accumulate on defined spiral graphs,which run through the Square Root Spiral. These spiral graphs can be assigned to different spiral-systems, in which all spiral-graphs have the same direction of rotation and the same -second difference- between the numbers, which lie on these spiral-graphs. A mathematical analysis shows, that these spiral graphs are caused exclusively by quadratic polynomials. For example the well known Euler Polynomial x2+x+41 appears on the Square Root Spiral in the form of three spiral-graphs, which are defined by three different quadratic polynomials. All natural numbers,divisible by a certain prime factor, also lie on defined spiral graphs on the Square Root Spiral (or Spiral of Theodorus, or Wurzelspirale). And the Square Numbers 4, 9, 16, 25, 36 even form a highly three-symmetrical system of three spiral graphs, which divides the square root spiral into three equal areas. Fibonacci number sequences also play a part in the structure of the Square Root Spiral. With the help of the Number-Spiral, described by Mr. Robert Sachs, a comparison can be drawn between the Square Root Spiral and the Ulam Spiral. The shown sections of his study of the number spiral contain diagrams, which are related to my analysis results, especially in regards to the distribution of prime numbers.

Harry K. Hahn; Robert Sachs

2008-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

371

Facility worker technical basis document  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the technical basis for facility worker safety to support the Tank Farms Documented Safety Analysis and described the criteria and methodology for allocating controls to hazardous conditions with significant facility worker consequences and presents the results of the allocation.

EVANS, C.B.

2003-03-21T23:59:59.000Z

372

Reaction hot pressing of {alpha}{prime}- and {beta}{prime}0SiAlON ceramics  

SciTech Connect

Hot pressing kinetics of {alpha}-Si{sub 3}N{sub 4}, AlN, Al{sub 2}O{sub 3}, and Y{sub 2}O{sub 3} powder mixtures forming {alpha}{prime}- and {beta}{prime}-SiAlONs have been studied. Densification proceeds in two steps, first by a small shrinkage upon ternary eutectic oxide melting (SiO{sub 2}-Al{sub 2}O{sub 3}-Y{sub 2}O{sub 3}) at 1340 C, followed by a massive particle rearrangement and further shrinkage at higher temperature when nitride dissolution begins. With better wettability, AlN initially traps the oxide melt and delays densification. In addition, the preferential dissolution of AlN at 1450 C enriches the melt composition in Al, triggering transient precipitation of supersaturated {beta}{prime}-SiAlON. Full densification is readily achieved at 1550 C without complete {alpha}-Si{sub 3}N{sub 4} conversion.

Shyhlung Hwang; Iwei Chen [Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States). Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

FACILITY WORKER TECHNICAL BASIS DOCUMENT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This technical basis document was developed to support RPP-13033, ''Tank Farms Documented Safety Analysis (DSA). It describes the criteria and methodology for allocating controls to hazardous conditions with significant facility worker (FW) consequence and presents the results of the allocation. The criteria and methodology for identifying controls that address FW safety are in accordance with DOE-STD-3009-94, ''Preparation Guide for US Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses''.

SHULTZ, M.V.

2005-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

374

Hanford Generic Interim Safety Basis  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this document is to identify WHC programs and requirements that are an integral part of the authorization basis for nuclear facilities that are generic to all WHC-managed facilities. The purpose of these programs is to implement the DOE Orders, as WHC becomes contractually obligated to implement them. The Hanford Generic ISB focuses on the institutional controls and safety requirements identified in DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports.

Lavender, J.C.

1994-09-09T23:59:59.000Z

375

TCAP Aluminium Dissolution Flowsheet Basis  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Actinide Technology Section has proposed the use of an nitric acid HNO3 and potassium fluoride KF flowsheet for stripping palladium Pd from palladium-coated kieselguhr Pd/K and removing aluminum (Al) metal foam from the TCAP coils. The basis for the HNO3-KF flowsheet is drawn from many sources. A brief review of the sources will be presented. The basic flowsheet involves three process steps, each with its own chemistry.

PIERCE, ROBERTA.

2004-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

" Row: NAICS Codes;" " Column: Supplier Sources of Purchased Electricity, Natural Gas, and Steam;"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8 Number of Establishments by Quantity of Purchased Electricity, Natural Gas, and Steam, 2002;" 8 Number of Establishments by Quantity of Purchased Electricity, Natural Gas, and Steam, 2002;" " Level: National Data; " " Row: NAICS Codes;" " Column: Supplier Sources of Purchased Electricity, Natural Gas, and Steam;" " Unit: Establishment Counts." ,,,"Electricity","Components",,,"Natural","Gas","Components",,"Steam","Components" ,,,,"Electricity","Electricity",,,"Natural Gas","Natural Gas",,,"Steam","Steam" " "," ",,,"from Only","from Both",,,"from Only","from Both",,,"from Only","from Both"," ",," "

377

Scale Free Analysis and the Prime Number Theorem  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We present an elementary proof of the prime number theorem. The relative error follows a golden ratio scaling law and respects the bound obtained from the Riemann's hypothesis. The proof is derived in the framework of a scale free nonarchimedean extension of the real number system exploiting the concept of relative infinitesimals introduced recently in connection with ultrametric models of Cantor sets. The extended real number system is realized as a completion of the field of rational numbers $Q$ under a {\\em new} nonarchimedean absolute value, which treats arbitrarily small and large numbers separately from a finite real number.

Dhurjati Prasad Datta; Anuja Roy Choudhuri

2010-01-10T23:59:59.000Z

378

V-014: Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager JBoss RMI Services Let  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14: Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager JBoss RMI Services 14: Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager JBoss RMI Services Let Remote Users Execute Arbitrary Commands V-014: Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager JBoss RMI Services Let Remote Users Execute Arbitrary Commands November 1, 2012 - 6:00am Addthis PROBLEM: Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager JBoss RMI Services Let Remote Users Execute Arbitrary Commands PLATFORM: All Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager releases prior to release 6.1(1), for both the Microsoft Windows and Linux platforms, are affected by this vulnerability. ABSTRACT: A vulnerability was reported in Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager. REFERENCE LINKS: Cisco Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20121031-dcnm SecurityTracker Alert ID: 1027712 CVE-2012-5417 IMPACT ASSESSMENT: High DISCUSSION: The vulnerability exists because JBoss Application Server Remote Method

379

A practical guide for understanding the Prime Contractor's relationship with b  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

practical guide for understanding the Prime Contractor's relationship with both government practical guide for understanding the Prime Contractor's relationship with both government and corporate environments in the efficient delivery of purchased products and services at the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration's Kansas City Plant. Participate in this procurement forum and you will: * Gain insight on how Honeywell FM&T, a Prime Contractor for the NNSA, procures products and services * Tour the Technology Display Center and see what we do

380

The Combined Otto and Stirling Cycle Prime-Mover-Based Power Plant.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

?? An exploratory study of the combined Otto and Stirling cycle prime mover is presented. The Stirling cycle acts as the bottoming cycle on the (more)

Cullen, Barry, (Thesis)

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

The distribution of the non-prime numbers - A new Sieve  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We present a new sieve that allows us to find the prime numbers by using only regular patterns and, more importantly, avoiding any duplication of elements between them.

Fabio Giraldo-Franco; Phil Dyke

2011-01-19T23:59:59.000Z

382

BASIS Equipment | ORNL Neutron Sciences  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Equipment Equipment BASIS Schematic Schematic of the SNS Backscattering Spectrometer. Helium dewer cooling a sample Helium dewer cooling a sample (bird's eye view). The heart of the work in a typical experiment is setting up the sample in the desired environment. A typical neutron sample ranging from a millimeter to a few centimeters is placed in a specialized cylindrical can and sealed. For liquids, the backscattering instrument often uses an annular can, created by placing a smaller can within a larger can and inserting the liquid sample between the two cans. This picture shows a helium dewer cooling the environment encompassing the sample can, which has been lowered into the beam from the top of the scattering tank. Crystals Crystals. The backscattering spectrometer is defined by the reflection of specific

383

Internal dosimetry technical basis manual  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The internal dosimetry program at the Savannah River Site (SRS) consists of radiation protection programs and activities used to detect and evaluate intakes of radioactive material by radiation workers. Examples of such programs are: air monitoring; surface contamination monitoring; personal contamination surveys; radiobioassay; and dose assessment. The objectives of the internal dosimetry program are to demonstrate that the workplace is under control and that workers are not being exposed to radioactive material, and to detect and assess inadvertent intakes in the workplace. The Savannah River Site Internal Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual (TBM) is intended to provide a technical and philosophical discussion of the radiobioassay and dose assessment aspects of the internal dosimetry program. Detailed information on air, surface, and personal contamination surveillance programs is not given in this manual except for how these programs interface with routine and special bioassay programs.

Not Available

1990-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

384

BASIS Set Exchange (BSE): Chemistry Basis Sets from the William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) Basis Set Library  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

The Basis Set Exchange (BSE) provides a web-based user interface for downloading and uploading Gaussian-type (GTO) basis sets, including effective core potentials (ECPs), from the EMSL Basis Set Library. It provides an improved user interface and capabilities over its predecessor, the EMSL Basis Set Order Form, for exploring the contents of the EMSL Basis Set Library. The popular Basis Set Order Form and underlying Basis Set Library were originally developed by Dr. David Feller and have been available from the EMSL webpages since 1994. BSE not only allows downloading of the more than 200 Basis sets in various formats; it allows users to annotate existing sets and to upload new sets. (Specialized Interface)

Feller, D; Schuchardt, Karen L.; Didier, Brett T.; Elsethagen, Todd; Sun, Lisong; Gurumoorthi, Vidhya; Chase, Jared; Li, Jun

385

SIC-POVMs and MUBs: Geometrical Relationships in Prime Dimension  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The paper concerns Weyl-Heisenberg covariant SIC-POVMs (symmetric informationally complete positive operator valued measures) and full sets of MUBs (mutually unbiased bases) in prime dimension. When represented as vectors in generalized Bloch space a SIC-POVM forms a d^2-1 dimensional regular simplex (d being the Hilbert space dimension). By contrast, the generalized Bloch vectors representing a full set of MUBs form d+1 mutually orthogonal d-1 dimensional regular simplices. In this paper we show that, in the Weyl-Heisenberg case, there are some simple geometrical relationships between the single SIC-POVM simplex and the d+1 MUB simplices. We go on to give geometrical interpretations of the minimum uncertainty states introduced by Wootters and Sussman, and by Appleby, Dang and Fuchs, and of the fiduciality condition given by Appleby, Dang and Fuchs.

D. M. Appleby

2009-05-09T23:59:59.000Z

386

SIC-POVMs and MUBs: Geometrical Relationships in Prime Dimension  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The paper concerns Weyl-Heisenberg covariant SIC-POVMs (symmetric informationally complete positive operator valued measures) and full sets of MUBs (mutually unbiased bases) in prime dimension. When represented as vectors in generalized Bloch space a SIC-POVM forms a d^2-1 dimensional regular simplex (d being the Hilbert space dimension). By contrast, the generalized Bloch vectors representing a full set of MUBs form d+1 mutually orthogonal d-1 dimensional regular simplices. In this paper we show that, in the Weyl-Heisenberg case, there are some simple geometrical relationships between the single SIC-POVM simplex and the d+1 MUB simplices. We go on to give geometrical interpretations of the minimum uncertainty states introduced by Wootters and Sussman, and by Appleby, Dang and Fuchs, and of the fiduciality condition given by Appleby, Dang and Fuchs.

Appleby, D M

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

387

Existing reactor expansion study basis  

SciTech Connect

The latest HAPO Five Year Program review, HW-59633, forecasts substantial increases in Pu production from the eight existing Hanford reactors over the next several years. These production increases would be attained by a combination of several methods which include increased reactor power levels resulting from higher process water flow rates and coolant bulk outlet temperatures, improved time operated efficiency, higher conversion ratios, and reduced transient reactivity losses. In order to provide a realistic basis for budgeting to meet these or other increased production goals, it is necessary that a study program be undertaken to determine in general terms the plant changes required to support these forecasted levels, to evaluate the economic and technical feasibility of achieving the process conditions, and to present an integrated program for achieving these objectives. This study program will necessarily consider the interrelated effects of a number of various facets of reactor and water plant process conditions, operational requirements, and proposed development programs. The purpose of this document is to present a plan for the execution of the proposed study. Included in this outline are a review of the basic study considerations, problem assignments and schedules, and manpower and cost estimates for the performance of the study.

Heacock, H.W.

1959-06-24T23:59:59.000Z

388

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis  

SciTech Connect

This report, commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), provides a comprehensive set of cost data supporting a cost analysis for the relative economic comparison of options for use in the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI) Program. The report describes the AFCI cost basis development process, reference information on AFCI cost modules, a procedure for estimating fuel cycle costs, economic evaluation guidelines, and a discussion on the integration of cost data into economic computer models. This report contains reference cost data for 25 cost modules23 fuel cycle cost modules and 2 reactor modules. The cost modules were developed in the areas of natural uranium mining and milling, conversion, enrichment, depleted uranium disposition, fuel fabrication, interim spent fuel storage, reprocessing, waste conditioning, spent nuclear fuel (SNF) packaging, long-term monitored retrievable storage, near surface disposal of low-level waste (LLW), geologic repository and other disposal concepts, and transportation processes for nuclear fuel, LLW, SNF, transuranic, and high-level waste.

D. E. Shropshire; K. A. Williams; W. B. Boore; J. D. Smith; B. W. Dixon; M. Dunzik-Gougar; R. D. Adams; D. Gombert; E. Schneider

2008-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis  

SciTech Connect

This report, commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), provides a comprehensive set of cost data supporting a cost analysis for the relative economic comparison of options for use in the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI) Program. The report describes the AFCI cost basis development process, reference information on AFCI cost modules, a procedure for estimating fuel cycle costs, economic evaluation guidelines, and a discussion on the integration of cost data into economic computer models. This report contains reference cost data for 26 cost modules24 fuel cycle cost modules and 2 reactor modules. The cost modules were developed in the areas of natural uranium mining and milling, conversion, enrichment, depleted uranium disposition, fuel fabrication, interim spent fuel storage, reprocessing, waste conditioning, spent nuclear fuel (SNF) packaging, long-term monitored retrievable storage, near surface disposal of low-level waste (LLW), geologic repository and other disposal concepts, and transportation processes for nuclear fuel, LLW, SNF, and high-level waste.

D. E. Shropshire; K. A. Williams; W. B. Boore; J. D. Smith; B. W. Dixon; M. Dunzik-Gougar; R. D. Adams; D. Gombert

2007-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis  

SciTech Connect

This report, commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), provides a comprehensive set of cost data supporting a cost analysis for the relative economic comparison of options for use in the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI) Program. The report describes the AFCI cost basis development process, reference information on AFCI cost modules, a procedure for estimating fuel cycle costs, economic evaluation guidelines, and a discussion on the integration of cost data into economic computer models. This report contains reference cost data for 25 cost modules23 fuel cycle cost modules and 2 reactor modules. The cost modules were developed in the areas of natural uranium mining and milling, conversion, enrichment, depleted uranium disposition, fuel fabrication, interim spent fuel storage, reprocessing, waste conditioning, spent nuclear fuel (SNF) packaging, long-term monitored retrievable storage, near surface disposal of low-level waste (LLW), geologic repository and other disposal concepts, and transportation processes for nuclear fuel, LLW, SNF, transuranic, and high-level waste.

D. E. Shropshire; K. A. Williams; W. B. Boore; J. D. Smith; B. W. Dixon; M. Dunzik-Gougar; R. D. Adams; D. Gombert; E. Schneider

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

Another SunShot Success: GE to Make PrimeStar Solar Panels at New Colorado  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Another SunShot Success: GE to Make PrimeStar Solar Panels at New Another SunShot Success: GE to Make PrimeStar Solar Panels at New Colorado Plant Another SunShot Success: GE to Make PrimeStar Solar Panels at New Colorado Plant October 14, 2011 - 4:03pm Addthis Thin film solar panels produced by General Electric’s PrimeStar in Arvada, Colorado | Image courtesy of Edelman. Thin film solar panels produced by General Electric's PrimeStar in Arvada, Colorado | Image courtesy of Edelman. Minh Le Minh Le Program Manager, Solar Program Yesterday, General Electric (GE) announced that it will build a new thin-film photovoltaic (PV) solar panel manufacturing facility in Aurora, Colorado, to produce highly-efficient, low-cost panels that are based on innovative technology originally developed at the Energy Department's

392

Office of Nuclear Facility Basis & Facility Design  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design(HS-31) Reports to the Office of Nuclear Safety About Us The Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design establishes safety...

393

Basis of conversion factors for energy equivalents  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Basis of conversion factors for energy equivalents Conversion factors for energy equivalents are derived from the following relations: ...

394

Generalized multiscale radial basis function networks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A novel modelling framework is proposed for constructing parsimonious and flexible multiscale radial basis function networks (RBF). Unlike a conventional standard single scale RBF network, where all the basis functions have a common kernel width, the ... Keywords: Model term selection, Neural networks, Nonlinear system identification, Orthogonal least squares, Radial basis functions

Stephen A. Billings; Hua-Liang Wei; Michael A. Balikhin

2007-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

395

Beyond Design Basis Events | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Beyond Design Basis Events Beyond Design Basis Events Beyond Design Basis Events Beyond Design Basis Events Following the March 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant accident in Japan, DOE embarked upon several initiatives to investigate the safety posture of its nuclear facilities relative to beyond design basis events (BDBEs). These initiatives included issuing Safety Bulletin 2011-01, Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis, and conducting two DOE nuclear safety workshops. DOE also issued two reports documenting the results of these initiatives: Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to BDBEs, August 2011, and Report to the Secretary of Energy on Beyond Design Basis Event Pilot Evaluations, Results and Recommendations for Improvements to Enhance Nuclear Safety at DOE Nuclear Facilities,

396

SIC~POVMs and Clifford groups in prime dimensions  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We show that in prime dimensions not equal to three, each group covariant symmetric informationally complete positive operator valued measure (SIC~POVM) is covariant with respect to a unique Heisenberg--Weyl (HW) group. Moreover, the symmetry group of the SIC~POVM is a subgroup of the Clifford group. Hence, two SIC~POVMs covariant with respect to the HW group are unitarily or antiunitarily equivalent if and only if they are on the same orbit of the extended Clifford group. In dimension three, each group covariant SIC~POVM may be covariant with respect to three or nine HW groups, and the symmetry group of the SIC~POVM is a subgroup of at least one of the Clifford groups of these HW groups respectively. There may exist two or three orbits of equivalent SIC~POVMs for each group covariant SIC~POVM, depending on the order of its symmetry group. We then establish a complete equivalence relation among group covariant SIC~POVMs in dimension three, and classify inequivalent ones according to the geometric phases associated with fiducial vectors. Finally, we uncover additional SIC~POVMs by regrouping of the fiducial vectors from different SIC~POVMs which may or may not be on the same orbit of the extended Clifford group.

Huangjun Zhu

2010-03-18T23:59:59.000Z

397

SIC-POVMs and Clifford groups in prime dimensions  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We show that in prime dimensions not equal to 3, each group covariant symmetric informationally complete positive operator valued measure (SIC-POVM) is covariant with respect to a unique Heisenberg-Weyl (HW) group. Moreover, the symmetry group of the SIC-POVM is a subgroup of the Clifford group. And two SIC-POVMs covariant with respect to the HW group are unitary or antiunitary equivalent if and only if they are on the same orbit of the extended Clifford group. In dimension 3, each group covariant SIC-POVM may be covariant with respect to 3 or 9 HW groups, and the symmetry group of the SIC-POVM is a subgroup of at least one of the Clifford groups of these HW groups respectively. There may exist 2 or 3 equivalent orbits for each group covariant SIC-POVM. We also establish a complete equivalence relationship of group covariant SIC-POVMs in dimension 3, and classify all inequivalent ones according to the geometric phases associated with fiducial vectors.

Zhu, Huangjun

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

398

INL FCF Basis Review Follow-up  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2: Evaluation Basis Earthquake Event The second Significant Issue related to the EBE event and included several elements, including input parameters to the analysis,...

399

Lawrence Livermore National Laborotory Safety Basis Assessment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and implementation of safety basis documentation and execution of the unreviewed safety question (USQ) process. SCOPE The scope of this assessment includes the plans,...

400

Lawrence Livermore National Laborotory Safety Basis Assessment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the safety basis for LLNL nuclear facilities. It describes the method for categorizing nuclear facilities and summarizes the resulting requirements for the contents of the DSA....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Facility Representative Program: Nuclear Safety Basis Fundamentals...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Qualification Information Qualification Standards DOE Order Self-Study Modules DOE Fundamentals Handbooks Nuclear Safety Basis Self-Study Guide Energy Online Courses Available...

402

Just in Time DSA-The Hanford Nuclear Safety Basis Strategy  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL) is responsible for 30 hazard category 2 and 3 nuclear facilities that are operated by its prime contractors, Fluor Hanford Incorporated (FHI), Bechtel Hanford, Incorporated (BHI) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). The publication of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 830, Subpart B, Safety Basis Requirements (the Rule) in January 2001 imposed the requirement that the Documented Safety Analyses (DSA) for these facilities be reviewed against the requirements of the Rule. Those DSA that do not meet the requirements must either be upgraded to satisfy the Rule, or an exemption must be obtained. RL and its prime contractors have developed a Nuclear Safety Strategy that provides a comprehensive approach for supporting RL's efforts to meet its long term objectives for hazard category 2 and 3 facilities while also meeting the requirements of the Rule. This approach will result in a reduction of the total number of safety basis documents that must be developed and maintained to support the remaining mission and closure of the Hanford Site and ensure that the documentation that must be developed will support: compliance with the Rule; a ''Just-In-Time'' approach to development of Rule-compliant safety bases supported by temporary exemptions; and consolidation of safety basis documents that support multiple facilities with a common mission (e.g. decontamination, decommissioning and demolition [DD&D], waste management, surveillance and maintenance). This strategy provides a clear path to transition the safety bases for the various Hanford facilities from support of operation and stabilization missions through DD&D to accelerate closure. This ''Just-In-Time'' Strategy can also be tailored for other DOE Sites, creating the potential for large cost savings and schedule reductions throughout the DOE complex.

Olinger, S. J.; Buhl, A. R.

2002-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

403

Secretary Bodman Meets with Jordanian Prime Minister to Tout Role of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Jordanian Prime Minister to Tout Role Jordanian Prime Minister to Tout Role of Energy Diversity Secretary Bodman Meets with Jordanian Prime Minister to Tout Role of Energy Diversity January 17, 2008 - 10:23am Addthis Visits Royal Scientific Society and Holds Bilateral Energy Discussions with Senior Government Officials AMMAN, JORDAN - On his first stop of a six-nation swing through the Middle East and Europe, U.S. Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman met with Prime Minister Nader al-Dahabi in Amman, Jordan to highlight the nations' growing energy cooperation aimed at increasing global energy security. Secretary Bodman also visited Jordan's Royal Scientific Society where he met with the Secretary General of the Higher Council for Science and Technology Dr. Walid Al Turk and discussed the role of science and technology in providing

404

Jordan Isomorphisms and Jordan Derivations of Prime Rings with characteristic 2.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??In this thesis, we describe the Jordan isomorphisms and Jordan derivations on prime rings of characteristic 2. We prove that every Jordan isomorphism of Mn(F),n (more)

Tsai, Chia-Fang

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

Modification of {Delta}{sup Prime} by magnetic feedback and kinetic effects  

SciTech Connect

Two possible ways of modifying the linear tearing mode index, by active magnetic feedback and by drift kinetic effects of deeply trapped particles, are analytically investigated. Magnetic feedback schemes, studied in this work, are found generally stabilizing for {Delta}{sup Prime }. The drift kinetic effects from both thermal particles and hot ions tend to reduce the power of the large solution from the outer region. This generally leads to a destabilization of {Delta} Prime for the toroidal analytic equilibria considered here.

Liu Yueqiang; Hastie, R. J.; Hender, T. C. [Euratom/CCFE Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon OX14 3DB (United Kingdom)

2012-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

406

Grey-box radial basis function modelling  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A fundamental principle in data modelling is to incorporate available a priori information regarding the underlying data generating mechanism into the modelling process. We adopt this principle and consider grey-box radial basis function (RBF) modelling ... Keywords: Black-box model, Boundary value constraint, Data modelling, Grey-box model, Orthogonal least squares algorithm, Radial basis function network, Symmetry

Sheng Chen; Xia Hong; Chris J. Harris

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Property:ExplorationBasis | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

ExplorationBasis ExplorationBasis Jump to: navigation, search Property Name ExplorationBasis Property Type Text Description Exploration Basis Why was exploration work conducted in this area (e.g., USGS report of a geothermal resource, hot springs with geothemmetry indicating electrical generation capacity, etc.) Subproperties This property has the following 1 subproperty: M Mercury Vapor At Salt Wells Area (Henkle, Et Al., 2005) Pages using the property "ExplorationBasis" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 2 2-M Probe Survey At Coso Geothermal Area (1977) + Compare directly shallow temperature results with standard geothermal exploration techniques. 2-M Probe Survey At Coso Geothermal Area (1979) + Correct previously analyzed 2-m probe data

408

Design Basis Threat | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Design Basis Threat | National Nuclear Security Administration Design Basis Threat | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Design Basis Threat Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Design Basis Threat Design Basis Threat NNSA has taken aggressive action to improve the security of its nuclear weapons material (often referred to as special nuclear material, or SNM)

409

Basis for UCNI | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Basis for UCNI Basis for UCNI Basis for UCNI What documents contain the legal and policy foundations for the UCNI program? Section 148 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.), is the statutory basis for the UCNI program. 10 CFR Part 1017, Identification and Protection of Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information specifies many detailed policies and requirements concerning the UCNI program. DOE O 471.1B, Identification and Protection of Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information, specifies additional policies and requirements concerning the Department of Energy (DOE) UCNI program. UCNI General Guideline, GG-5, is a record of decisions made by the Director, OC, as to what general subject areas are UCNI. Note: GG-5 may only be used by the Director, OC, to make determinations as to whether

410

Basis for UCNI | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and policy foundations for the UCNI program? Section 148 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.), is the statutory basis for the UCNI program. 10...

411

Fossil Maintenance Basis Optimization: Challenges and Strategies  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report covers many of the process challenges and strategies that were encountered and deployed during the implementation and execution of a preventive maintenance basis optimization (MBO) process at fossil generating stations. This MBO process was executed by several Electric Power Research Institutemember (EPRI-member) companies on a fleetwide basis as part of the members' plant reliability optimization (PRO) efforts. The PRO process covers many of the preventive maintenance (PM) programs at multip...

2010-05-27T23:59:59.000Z

412

ASI Supplier Evaluation Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 Vendor Evaluation Record 11_0203 1 of 4 5 Vendor Evaluation Record 11_0203 1 of 4 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Vendor Evaluation Record Document Number: ADMF-015 Rev. 11_0203 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: ADMP-002, Vendor Selection and Management Process Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): N/A ADMF-015 Vendor Evaluation Record 11_0203 2 of 4 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 08_1016 Added section for vendors that will not be used due to non-conformance of material delivered. 08_1110 Removed section for vendors that will not be used due to non-conformance of material delivered. Do Not Use section will be placed on ADMF-016, Vendor List.

413

Supplier Selection Management Process  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ADMP-002 Vendor Selection and Management Process 11_0203 1 of 9 ADMP-002 Vendor Selection and Management Process 11_0203 1 of 9 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: Vendor Selection and Management Process Document Number: ADMP-002 Rev. 11_0203 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: Q-001, Quality Manual Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): ADMF-009 Vendor Audit Plan, ADMF-010 Vendor Audit Checklist, ADMF-011 Vendor Audit Report, ADMF-015 Vendor Evaluation Record, ADMP-001 Procurement Process, ADMF-016 EOTA Vendor List, REG-003 Record Register ADMP-002 Vendor Selection and Management Process 11_0203 2 of 9 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 08_1110 Added verbiage and reference for ADMF-016, EOTA Vendor List to process.

414

Supplier, Vendor Forms  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

research and development laboratory, LANL seeks to do business with qualified companies that offer value and high quality products and services. Contact Small Business...

415

The concept of primes and the algorithm for counting the greatest common divisor in Ancient China  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

When people mention the number theoretical achievements in Ancient China, the famous Chinese Remainder Theorem always springs to mind. But, two more of them--the concept of primes and the algorithm for counting the greatest common divisor, are rarely spoken. Some scholars even think that Ancient China has not the concept of primes. The aim of this paper is to show that the concept of primes in Ancient China can be traced back to the time of Confuciusor (about 500 B.C.) or more ago. This implies that the concept of primes in Ancient China is much earlier than the concept of primes in Euclid's \\emph{Elements}(about 300 B.C.) of Ancient Greece. We also shows that the algorithm for counting the greatest common divisor in Ancient China is essentially the Euclidean algorithm or the binary gcd algorithm. Donald E. Knuth said that "the binary gcd algorithm was discovered by J. Stein in 1961". Nevertheless, Knuth was wrong. The ancient Chinese algorithm is clearly much earlier than J. Stein's algorithm.

Zhang, Shaohua

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Safety Basis Criteria & Review Approach Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Basis Criteria & Review Approach Documents Safety Basis Criteria & Review Approach Documents Safety Basis Criteria & Review Approach Documents Documents Available for Download CRAD, Safety Basis - Idaho MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility CRAD, Safety Basis - Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II CRAD, Safety Basis - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility CRAD, Safety Basis - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Contractor ORR CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project CRAD, Safety Basis - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility

417

ISOTHERMAL (DELTA)/(ALPHA-PRIME) TRANSFORMATION AND TTT DIAGRAM IN A PLUTONIUM GALLIUM ALLOY  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is used as an alternative approach to determining the tine-temperature-transformation (TTT) diagram for the martensitic delta to alpha-prime transformation in a Pu-2.0 at% Ga alloy. Previous work suggests that the TTT diagram for a similar alloy exhibits an unusual double-C curve for isothermal holds of less than 100 minutes. Here, we extend this diagram to 18 hours, and confirm the double-C curve behavior. When the sample is cooled prior to the isothermal holds, the delta to alpha-prime transformation is observed as several overlapping exothermic peaks. These peaks are very reproducible, and they are believed to be the result of different kinds of delta to alpha-prime martensitic transformation. This may be due to the presence of different nucleation sites and/or different morphologies.

Oudot, B P; Blobaum, K M; Wall, M A; Schwartz, A J

2005-11-11T23:59:59.000Z

418

Outfix-free regular languages and prime outfix-free decomposition  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A string x is an outfix of a string y if there is a string w such that x1wx2 = y, wherex = x1x2 and a set X of strings is outfix-free if no string in X is an outfix of any other string in X. We examine the outfix-free regular languages. Based on the properties of outfix strings, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm that determines the outfix-freeness of regular languages. We consider two cases: A language is given as a set of strings and a language is given by an acyclic deterministic finite-state automaton. Furthermore, we investigate the prime outfix-free decomposition of outfix-free regular languages and design a linear-time prime outfix-free decomposition algorithm for outfix-free regular languages. We demonstrate the uniqueness of prime outfix-free decomposition.

Yo-sub Han; Derick Wood

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

419

Nuclear structure of {sup 10}B studied with (e,e{prime}), ({pi},{pi}{prime}) and ({gamma},{pi}) reactions  

SciTech Connect

The authors studied nuclear structure of {sup 10}B using (e,e{prime}),({pi},{pi}{prime}) and ({gamma},{pi}) reactions under the distorted wave impulse approximation (DWIA). For this purpose the off-shell dependence of the amplitude was taken into account in the momentum space DWIA. They used the off-shell elementary amplitude of ({pi},{pi}) and ({gamma},{pi}) by the model of Nozawa, Blankleider and Lee. The first order core polarization effects were incorporated with the p-shell wave functions of Cohen and Kurath and Hauge and Maripuu. It was shown that the core-polarization effects greatly improve the agreement with the experimental data and that the simultaneous study of these reactions is useful to probe the spin structure of p-shell nuclei.

Sato, T.; Odagawa, N.; Ohtsubo, H. [Osaka Univ., Toyonaka (Japan). Dept. of Physics; Lee, T.S.H. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

Price of Motor Gasoline Through Retail Outlets  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Prices, Sales Volumes & Stocks by State Prices, Sales Volumes & Stocks by State (Dollars per Gallon Excluding Taxes) Data Series: Retail Price - Motor Gasoline Retail Price - Regular Gasoline Retail Price - Midgrade Gasoline Retail Price - Premium Gasoline Retail Price - Aviation Gasoline Retail Price - Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Retail Price - Propane Retail Price - Kerosene Retail Price - No. 1 Distillate Retail Price - No. 2 Distillate Retail Price - No. 2 Fuel Oil Retail Price - No. 2 Diesel Fuel Retail Price - No. 4 Fuel Oil Prime Supplier Sales - Motor Gasoline Prime Supplier Sales - Regular Gasoline Prime Supplier Sales - Midgrade Gasoline Prime Supplier Sales - Premium Gasoline Prime Supplier Sales - Aviation Gasoline Prime Supplier Sales - Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Prime Supplier Sales - Propane (Consumer Grade) Prime Supplier Sales - Kerosene Prime Supplier Sales - No. 1 Distillate Prime Supplier Sales - No. 2 Distillate Prime Supplier Sales - No. 2 Fuel Oil Prime Supplier Sales - No. 2 Diesel Fuel Prime Supplier Sales - No. 4 Fuel Oil Prime Supplier Sales - Residual Fuel Oil Stocks - Finished Motor Gasoline Stocks - Reformulated Gasoline Stocks - Conventional Gasoline Stocks - Motor Gasoline Blending Components Stocks - Kerosene Stocks - Distillate Fuel Oil Stocks - Distillate F.O., 15 ppm and under Sulfur Stocks - Distillate F.O., Greater than 15 to 500 ppm Sulfur Stocks - Distillate F.O., Greater 500 ppm Sulfur Stocks - Residual Fuel Oil Stocks - Propane/Propylene Period: Monthly Annual

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Basis for OUO | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Classification » Official Use Only Information » Services » Classification » Official Use Only Information » Basis for OUO Basis for OUO What documents contain the policy foundation for the OUO program? DOE O 471.3 Admin Chg 1, Identifying and Protecting Official Use Only Information. DOE M 471.3-1 Admin Chg 1, Manual for Identifying and Protecting Official Use Only Information. Training & Reference Materials Basis for OUO OUO Review Requirement Access to OUO Protection of OUO Questions about Making OUO Determinations - OUO and the FOIA Exemptions How is a Document Containing OUO Marked? Controlled Unclassified Information and E.O. 13556 Resources for OUO Enforcement Guidance Oversight Reporting Security Classification Classification Training Institute Official Use Only Information Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information (UCNI)

422

INL FCF Basis Review Follow-up  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2011 , 2011 Independent Review Report Idaho National Laboratory Fuel Conditioning Facility Safety Basis Review Follow-up PURPOSE The purpose of this follow-up review was to verify how and to what extent Idaho National Laboratory (INL) addressed the Significant Issues that were identified in the April 2010 Independent Oversight report on the INL Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF) safety basis review, as well as the consideration given to the recommendations that were made. Significant Issues were defined in that report as problems or concerns that affected the validity of the FCF safety basis documentation. The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) fulfilled this objective by reviewing the draft Safety Analysis Report (SAR) for the FCF,

423

Statefinder diagnostic and $w-w^{\\prime}$ analysis for interacting polytropic gas dark energy model  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The interacting polytropic gas dark energy model is investigated from the viewpoint of statefinder diagnostic tool and $w-w^{\\prime}$ analysis. The dependency of the statefinder parameters on the parameter of the model as well as the interaction parameter between dark matter and dark energy is calculated. We show that different values of the parameters of model and different values of interaction parameter result different evolutionary trajectories in $s-r$ and $w-w^{\\prime}$ planes. The polytropic gas model of dark energy mimics the standard $\\Lambda$CDM model at the early time.

M. Malekjani; A. Khodam-Mohammadi

2012-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

424

Coupled-channel continuum eigenchannel basis  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The goal of this paper is to calculate bound, resonant and scattering states in the coupled-channel formalism without relying on the boundary conditions at large distances. The coupled-channel solution is expanded in eigenchannel bases i.e. in eigenfunctions of diagonal Hamiltonians. Each eigenchannel basis may includes discrete and discretized continuum (real or complex energy) single particle states. The coupled-channel solutions are computed through diagonalization in these bases. The method is applied to a few two-channel problems. The exact bound spectrum of the Poeschl-Teller potential is well described by a basis of real energy continuum states. For the deuteron with the Reid potential the experimental energy and the $S$ and $D$ wave functions content are reproduced in the asymptotic limit of the energy cutoff. For the Noro-Taylor potential, beside the exact bound state energies the resonant state energy is also well reproduced by using the complex energy Berggren basis. It is found that the expansion of the coupled-channel wave functions in these eigenchannel bases require less computational effort than the use of any other basis. The solutions are stable and converge as the energy cutoff increases.

R. M. Id Betan

2013-11-18T23:59:59.000Z

425

Priming, sense-making and help: Analysis of player behaviour in an immersive theatrical experience  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Understanding how people behave in prototypical forms of ubiquitous computing systems can help determine future designs and technical requirements. In a theatrical puzzle game called ''Last Will'' we were able to observe two hundred participants over ... Keywords: Mental model, Pervasive computing, Priming, Situation awareness, Tangible interface, artefacts

Josephine Reid; Richard Hull; Ben Clayton; Gary Porter; Phil Stenton

2010-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

Analysis of Impacts on Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands in Implementing NEPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) memorandum on Analysis of Impacts on Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands in Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act was developed in cooperation with the Department of Agriculture. It updates and supersedes CEQ's previous memorandum on this subject of August 1976.

427

100 million hours of audiovisual content: digital preservation and access in the PrestoPRIME project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We report preliminary results of PrestoPRIME, an EU FP7 integrated project, including audiovisual (AV) archives, academics and industrial partners, focused on long-term digital preservation of AV media objects and on improving access by integrating media ... Keywords: audiovisual archives, broadcast, digital preservation, long-term preservation framework

Matthew Addis; Walter Allasia; Werner Bailer; Laurent Boch; Francesco Gallo; Richard Wright

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

428

Outfix-Free Regular Languages and Prime Outfix-Free Decomposition  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Outfix-Free Regular Languages and Prime Outfix-Free Decomposition Yo-Sub Han and Derick Wood and a set X of strings is outfix-free if no string in X is an outfix of any other string in X. We examine the outfix-free regular languages. Based on the properties of outfix strings, we develop a polynomial

Han, Yo-Sub

429

Method for high-volume sequencing of nucleic acids: random and directed priming with libraries of oligonucleotides  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

Random and directed priming methods for determining nucleotide sequences by enzymatic sequencing techniques, using libraries of primers of lengths 8, 9 or 10 bases, are disclosed. These methods permit direct sequencing of nucleic acids as large as 45,000 base pairs or larger without the necessity for subcloning. Individual primers are used repeatedly to prime sequence reactions in many different nucleic acid molecules. Libraries containing as few as 10,000 octamers, 14,200 nonamers, or 44,000 decamers would have the capacity to determine the sequence of almost any cosmid DNA. Random priming with a fixed set of primers from a smaller library can also be used to initiate the sequencing of individual nucleic acid molecules, with the sequence being completed by directed priming with primers from the library. In contrast to random cloning techniques, a combined random and directed priming strategy is far more efficient. 2 figs.

Studier, F.W.

1995-04-18T23:59:59.000Z

430

GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION POTENTIAL WITH COMBINED HEAT AND POWER WITH DISTRIBUTED GENERATION PRIME MOVERS - ASME 2012  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Pending or recently enacted greenhouse gas regulations and mandates are leading to the need for current and feasible GHG reduction solutions including combined heat and power (CHP). Distributed generation using advanced reciprocating engines, gas turbines, microturbines and fuel cells has been shown to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) compared to the U.S. electrical generation mix due to the use of natural gas and high electrical generation efficiencies of these prime movers. Many of these prime movers are also well suited for use in CHP systems which recover heat generated during combustion or energy conversion. CHP increases the total efficiency of the prime mover by recovering waste heat for generating electricity, replacing process steam, hot water for buildings or even cooling via absorption chilling. The increased efficiency of CHP systems further reduces GHG emissions compared to systems which do not recover waste thermal energy. Current GHG mandates within the U.S Federal sector and looming GHG legislation for states puts an emphasis on understanding the GHG reduction potential of such systems. This study compares the GHG savings from various state-of-the- art prime movers. GHG reductions from commercially available prime movers in the 1-5 MW class including, various industrial fuel cells, large and small gas turbines, micro turbines and reciprocating gas engines with and without CHP are compared to centralized electricity generation including the U.S. mix and the best available technology with natural gas combined cycle power plants. The findings show significant GHG saving potential with the use of CHP. Also provided is an exploration of the accounting methodology for GHG reductions with CHP and the sensitivity of such analyses to electrical generation efficiency, emissions factors and most importantly recoverable heat and thermal recovery efficiency from the CHP system.

Curran, Scott [ORNL; Theiss, Timothy J [ORNL; Bunce, Michael [ORNL

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

431

Thermal evolution behavior of carbides and {gamma} Prime precipitates in FGH96 superalloy powder  

SciTech Connect

The characteristics of rapidly solidified FGH96 superalloy powder and the thermal evolution behavior of carbides and {gamma} Prime precipitates within powder particles were investigated. It was observed that the reduction of powder size and the increase of cooling rate had transformed the solidification morphologies of atomized powder from dendrite in major to cellular structure. The secondary dendritic spacing was measured to be 1.02-2.55 {mu}m and the corresponding cooling rates were estimated to be in the range of 1.4 Multiplication-Sign 10{sup 4}-4.7 Multiplication-Sign 10{sup 5} K{center_dot}s{sup -1}. An increase in the annealing temperature had rendered the phase transformation of carbides evolving from non-equilibrium MC Prime carbides to intermediate transition stage of M{sub 23}C{sub 6} carbides, and finally to thermodynamically stable MC carbides. The superfine {gamma} Prime precipitates were formed at the dendritic boundaries of rapidly solidified superalloy powder. The coalescence, growth, and homogenization of {gamma}' precipitates occurred with increasing annealing temperature. With decreasing cooling rate from 650 Degree-Sign C{center_dot}K{sup -1} to 5 Degree-Sign C{center_dot}K{sup -1}, the morphological development of {gamma} Prime precipitates had been shown to proceed from spheroidal to cuboidal and finally to solid state dendrites. Meanwhile, a shift had been observed from dendritic morphology to recrystallized structure between 900 Degree-Sign C and 1050 Degree-Sign C. Moreover, accelerated evolution of carbides and {gamma}' precipitates had been facilitated by the formation of new grain boundaries which provide fast diffusion path for atomic elements. - Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Microstructural characteristic of FGH96 superalloy powder was investigated. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer The relation between microstructure, particle size, and cooling rate was studied. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Thermal evolution behavior of {gamma} Prime and carbides in loose FGH96 powder was studied.

Zhang Lin, E-mail: zhanglincsu@163.com [State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, Beijing Key Laboratory for Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083 (China); Liu Hengsan, E-mail: lhsj63@sohu.com [State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, Beijing Key Laboratory for Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083 (China); He Xinbo, E-mail: xb_he@163.com [State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, Beijing Key Laboratory for Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083 (China); Rafi-ud-din, E-mail: rafiuddi@gmail.com [State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, Beijing Key Laboratory for Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083 (China); Qu Xuanhui, E-mail: quxh@ustb.edu.cn [State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, Beijing Key Laboratory for Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083 (China); Qin Mingli, E-mail: mlqin75@hotmail.com [State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, Beijing Key Laboratory for Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083 (China); Li Zhou, E-mail: zhouli621@126.com [National Key Lab of High Temperature Structural Materials, Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing, 100095 (China); Zhang Guoqing, E-mail: g.zhang@126.com [National Key Lab of High Temperature Structural Materials, Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing, 100095 (China)

2012-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

432

Radioactive Waste Management BasisApril 2006  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Radioactive Waste Management Basis (RWMB) documents radioactive waste management practices adopted at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) pursuant to Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management. The purpose of this Radioactive Waste Management Basis is to describe the systematic approach for planning, executing, and evaluating the management of radioactive waste at LLNL. The implementation of this document will ensure that waste management activities at LLNL are conducted in compliance with the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, and the Implementation Guide for DOE Manual 435.1-1, Radioactive Waste Management Manual. Technical justification is provided where methods for meeting the requirements of DOE Order 435.1 deviate from the DOE Manual 435.1-1 and Implementation Guide.

Perkins, B K

2011-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

433

Bessel-Zernike Discrete Variable Representation Basis  

SciTech Connect

The connection between the Bessel discrete variable basis expansion and a specific form of an orthogonal set of Jacobi polynomials is demonstrated. These so-called Zernike polynomials provide alternative series expansions of suitable functions over the unit interval. Expressing a Bessel function in a Zernike expansion provides a straightforward method of generating series identities. Furthermore, the Zernike polynomials may also be used to efficiently evaluate the Hankel transform for rapidly decaying functions or functions with finite support.

Cerjan, C J

2005-10-24T23:59:59.000Z

434

Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Structural Basis for Activation Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin Print Wednesday, 30 November 2005 00:00 Cholera is a serious disease that claims thousands of victims each year in third-world, war-torn, and disaster-stricken nations. The culprit is the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, which can be ingested through contaminated food or water and colonizes the mucous membrane of the human small intestine. There, it secretes cholera toxin (CT), a protein whose A1 subunit (CTA1) triggers a series of events culminating in the massive efflux of electrolytes and water into the intestinal cavity, causing the watery diarrhea characteristic of cholera that can lead to severe dehydration and death. Crystal structures of the CTA1 subunit in complex with its activator molecule (ARF6) reveal that binding of the ARF6 "switch" elicits dramatic changes in CTA1 loop regions, exposing the toxin's active site. The extensive CTA1-ARF6 interface mimics recognition of ARF6's normal cellular protein partners, which suggests that the toxin has evolved to exploit the molecular switch's promiscuous binding properties.

435

Business Case Slide 16: High-Volume: Casks - Basis  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Basis Previous Slide Next Slide Table of Contents High-Volume: Casks - Basis Basis Storage casks with high-density shielding can be directly loaded in reactor pools Eliminates a...

436

ORISE: The Medical Basis for Radiation-Accident Preparedness...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Medical Basis for Radiation-Accident Preparedness: Medical Management Proceedings of the Fifth International REACTS Symposium on the Medical Basis for Radiation-Accident...

437

The Molecular Basis for Water Taste in Drosophila  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition.J. , Weissman, J. , Julius, D. Molecular basis of infraredDarnell, J. (2000). Molecular Cell Biology, 4th edition.

Cameron, Peter

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

Online Monitoring Technical Basis and Analysis Framework for...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Online Monitoring Technical Basis and Analysis Framework for Emergency Diesel Generators-Interim Report for FY 2013 Online Monitoring Technical Basis and Analysis Framework for...

439

Central waste complex interim safety basis  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This interim safety basis provides the necessary information to conclude that hazards at the Central Waste Complex are controlled and that current and planned activities at the CWC can be conducted safely. CWC is a multi-facility complex within the Solid Waste Management Complex that receives and stores most of the solid wastes generated and received at the Hanford Site. The solid wastes that will be handled at CWC include both currently stored and newly generated low-level waste, low-level mixed waste, contact-handled transuranic, and contact-handled TRU mixed waste.

Cain, F.G.

1995-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

440

Technical basis for internal dosimetry at Hanford  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford Internal Dosimetry Program, administered by Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the US Department of Energy, provides routine bioassay monitoring for employees who are potentially exposed to radionuclides in the workplace. This report presents the technical basis for routine bioassay monitoring and the assessment of internal dose at Hanford. The radionuclides of concern include tritium, corrosion products (/sup 58/Co, /sup 60/Co, /sup 54/Mn, and /sup 59/Fe), strontium, cesium, iodine, europium, uranium, plutonium, and americium. Sections on each of these radionuclides discuss the sources and characteristics; dosimetry; bioassay measurements and monitoring; dose measurement, assessment, and mitigation; and bioassay follow-up treatment. 64 refs., 42 figs., 118 tabs.

Sula, M.J.; Carbaugh, E.H.; Bihl, D.E.

1989-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Technical basis for internal dosimetry at Hanford  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford Internal Dosimetry Program, administered by Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the US Department of Energy, provides routine bioassay monitoring for employees who are potentially exposed to radionuclides in the workplace. This report presents the technical basis for routine bioassay monitoring and the assessment of internal dose at Hanford. The radionuclides of concern include tritium, corrosion products ({sup 58}Co, {sup 60}Co, {sup 54}Mn, and {sup 59}Fe), strontium, cesium, iodine, europium, uranium, plutonium, and americium,. Sections on each of these radionuclides discuss the sources and characteristics; dosimetry; bioassay measurements and monitoring; dose measurement, assessment, and mitigation and bioassay follow-up treatment. 78 refs., 35 figs., 115 tabs.

Sula, M.J.; Carbaugh, E.H.; Bihl, D.E.

1991-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

MATERIAL-FLOW DATA STRUCTURES AS A BASIS FOR ENERGY INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

K PIPELINE 121 W ~ GULF C " EXXON OF " 2/2/79 FIGURE 3.flows gasoline to and from Exxon facilities in New Jersey;of suppliers and customers for Exxon's New Jersey gasoline

Krishnan, V.V.

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin Print Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin Print Cholera is a serious disease that claims thousands of victims each year in third-world, war-torn, and disaster-stricken nations. The culprit is the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, which can be ingested through contaminated food or water and colonizes the mucous membrane of the human small intestine. There, it secretes cholera toxin (CT), a protein whose A1 subunit (CTA1) triggers a series of events culminating in the massive efflux of electrolytes and water into the intestinal cavity, causing the watery diarrhea characteristic of cholera that can lead to severe dehydration and death. Crystal structures of the CTA1 subunit in complex with its activator molecule (ARF6) reveal that binding of the ARF6 "switch" elicits dramatic changes in CTA1 loop regions, exposing the toxin's active site. The extensive CTA1-ARF6 interface mimics recognition of ARF6's normal cellular protein partners, which suggests that the toxin has evolved to exploit the molecular switch's promiscuous binding properties.

444

Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin Print Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin Print Cholera is a serious disease that claims thousands of victims each year in third-world, war-torn, and disaster-stricken nations. The culprit is the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, which can be ingested through contaminated food or water and colonizes the mucous membrane of the human small intestine. There, it secretes cholera toxin (CT), a protein whose A1 subunit (CTA1) triggers a series of events culminating in the massive efflux of electrolytes and water into the intestinal cavity, causing the watery diarrhea characteristic of cholera that can lead to severe dehydration and death. Crystal structures of the CTA1 subunit in complex with its activator molecule (ARF6) reveal that binding of the ARF6 "switch" elicits dramatic changes in CTA1 loop regions, exposing the toxin's active site. The extensive CTA1-ARF6 interface mimics recognition of ARF6's normal cellular protein partners, which suggests that the toxin has evolved to exploit the molecular switch's promiscuous binding properties.

445

Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin Print Structural Basis for Activation of Cholera Toxin Print Cholera is a serious disease that claims thousands of victims each year in third-world, war-torn, and disaster-stricken nations. The culprit is the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, which can be ingested through contaminated food or water and colonizes the mucous membrane of the human small intestine. There, it secretes cholera toxin (CT), a protein whose A1 subunit (CTA1) triggers a series of events culminating in the massive efflux of electrolytes and water into the intestinal cavity, causing the watery diarrhea characteristic of cholera that can lead to severe dehydration and death. Crystal structures of the CTA1 subunit in complex with its activator molecule (ARF6) reveal that binding of the ARF6 "switch" elicits dramatic changes in CTA1 loop regions, exposing the toxin's active site. The extensive CTA1-ARF6 interface mimics recognition of ARF6's normal cellular protein partners, which suggests that the toxin has evolved to exploit the molecular switch's promiscuous binding properties.

446

Assessing Beyond Design Basis Seismic Events and Implications on Seismic  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Assessing Beyond Design Basis Seismic Events and Implications on Assessing Beyond Design Basis Seismic Events and Implications on Seismic Risk Assessing Beyond Design Basis Seismic Events and Implications on Seismic Risk September 19, 2012 Presenter: Jeffrey Kimball, Technical Specialist (Seismologist) Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Topics Covered: Department of Energy Approach to Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design (Seismic) Design Basis and Beyond Design Basis Seismic Events Seismic Risk Implications - Key Parameters and Insights Conclusions Assessing Beyond Design Basis Seismic Events and Implications on Seismic Risk More Documents & Publications DOE's Approach to Nuclear Facility Safety Analysis and Management Results from Beyond Design Basis Event Pilots Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Test Reactor Probabilistic Risk

447

Branching fractions for {psi}(2S){r_arrow}{gamma}{eta}{sup {prime}} and {gamma}{eta}  

SciTech Connect

We report first measurements of the branching fractions B({psi}{sub 2S}{r_arrow}{gamma}{eta}{sup {prime}})=(1.54{plus_minus}0.31{plus_minus}0.20){times}10{sup {minus}4} and B({psi}{sub 2S}{r_arrow}{gamma}{eta})=(0.53{plus_minus}0.31{plus_minus}0.08){times}10{sup {minus}4}. The {psi}(2S){r_arrow}{gamma}{eta}{sup {prime}} result is consistent with expectations of a model that considers the possibility of {eta}{sup {prime}}-{eta}{sub c}(2S) mixing. The ratio of the {psi}(2S){r_arrow}{gamma}{eta}{sup {prime}} and {psi}(2S){r_arrow}{gamma}{eta} rates is used to determine the pseudoscalar octet-singlet mixing angle. {copyright} {ital 1998} {ital The American Physical Society}

Bai, J.Z.; Bian, J.G.; Chai, Z.W.; Chen, G.P.; Chen, J.C.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.B.; Chen, Y.Q.; Cheng, B.S.; Cui, X.Z.; Ding, H.L.; Ding, L.Y.; Dong, L.Y.; Du, Z.Z.; Feng, S.; Gao, C.S.; Gao, M.L.; Gao, S.Q.; Gu, J.H.; Gu, S.D.; Gu, W.X.; Gu, Y.F.; Guo, Y.N.; Han, S.W.; Han, Y.; He, J.; He, J.T.; Hu, G.Y.; Hu, H.M.; Hu, J.L.; Hu, Q.H.; Hu, T.; Hu, X.Q.; Huang, J.D.; Huang, Y.Z.; Jiang, C.H.; Jin, Y.; Ke, Z.J.; Lai, Y.F.; Lang, P.F.; Li, C.G.; Li, D.; Li, H.B.; Li, J.; Li, P.Q.; Li, R.B.; Li, W.; Li, W.D.; Li, W.G.; Li, X.H.; Li, X.N.; Liu, H.M.; Liu, J.; Liu, J.H.; Liu, R.G.; Liu, Y.; Lu, F.; Lu, J.G.; Lu, J.Y.; Lu, L.C.; Luo, C.H.; Ma, A.M.; Ma, E.C.; Ma, J.M.; Mao, H.S.; Mao, Z.P.; Meng, X.C.; Nie, J.; Qi, N.D.; Qi, X.R.; Qiu, J.F.; Qu, Y.H.; Que, Y.K.; Rong, G.; Shao, Y.Y.; Shen, B.W.; Shen, D.L.; Shen, H.; Shen, X.Y.; Sheng, H.Y.; Shi, H.Z.; Song, X.F.; Sun, F.; Sun, H.S.; Tang, S.Q.; Tong, G.L.; Wang, F.; Wang, L.S.; Wang, L.Z.; Wang, M.; Wang, M.; Wang, P.; Wang, P.L.; Wang, S.M.; Wang, T.J.; Wang, Y.Y.; Wei, C.L.; Wu, Y.G.; Xi, D.M.; Xia, X.M.; Xie, P.P.; Xie, Y.; Xie, Y.H.; Xiong, W.J.; Xu, C.C.; Xu, G.F.; Xue, S.T.; Yan, J.; Yan, W.G.; Yang, C.M.; Yang, C.Y.; Yang, J.; Yang, X.F.; Ye, M.H.; Yi, K.; Yu, C.S.; Yu, C.X.; Yu, Z.Q.; Yu, Z.T.; Yuan, C.Z.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, B.Y.; Zhang, C.C.; Zhang, D.H.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, H.L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.L.; Zhang, J.W.; Zhang, L.S.; Zhang, Q.J.; Zhang, S.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhao, D.X.; Zhao, H.W.; Zhao, J.W.; Zhao, M.; Zhao, W.R.; Zhao, Z.G.; Zheng, J.P.; Zheng, L.S.; Zheng, Z.P.; Zhou, G.P.; Zhou, H.S.; Zhou, L.; Zhu, Q.M.; Zhu, Y.C.; Zhu, Y.S.; Zhuang, B.A. [Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing 100039, Peoples Republic of (China)] [Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing 100039, Peoples Republic of (China); Hitlin, D.G.; Kelsey, M.H.; Oyang, J.; Panetta, J.; Porter, F.; Weaver, M. [California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125 (United States)] [California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125 (United States); Chen, J.; Malchow, R.; Toki, W.; Yang, W. [Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 (United States)] [Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 (United States)

1998-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

448

Radioactive Waste Management BasisSept 2001  

SciTech Connect

This Radioactive Waste Management Basis (RWMB) documents radioactive waste management practices adopted at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) pursuant to Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management. The purpose of this RWMB is to describe the systematic approach for planning, executing, and evaluating the management of radioactive waste at LLNL. The implementation of this document will ensure that waste management activities at LLNL are conducted in compliance with the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, and the Implementation Guide for DOE manual 435.1-1, Radioactive Waste Management Manual. Technical justification is provided where methods for meeeting the requirements of DOE Order 435.1 deviate from the DOE Manual 435.1-1 and Implementation Guide.

Goodwin, S S

2011-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

449

Los Alamos National Laboratory Fission Basis  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report is an overview of two main publications that provide a comprehensive review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Fission Basis. The first is the experimental paper, {sup F}ission Product Data Measured at Los Alamos for Fission Spectrum and Thermal Neutrons on {sup 239}Pu, {sup 235}U, {sup 238}U, [Selby, H. D., et al., Nucl. Data Sheets, Vol. 111 2010, pp. 2891-2922] and the second is the theoretical paper, Fission Product Yields from Fission Spectrum n+ {sup 239}Pu for ENDF/B-VII.1, [Chadwick, M. B., et al., Nucl. Data Sheets, Vol. 111, 2010, pp. 2923-2964]. One important note is that none of this work would have been possible without the great documentation of the experimental details and results by G.W. Knobeloch, G. Butler, C.I. Browne, B. Erdal, B. Bayhurst, R. Prestwood, V. Armijo, J. Hasty and many others. (authors)

Keksis, A.L.; Chadwick, M.B.; Selby, H.D.; Mac Innes, M.R.; Barr, D.W.; Meade, R.A.; Burns, C.J.; Wallstrom, T.C. [Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM 87545 (United States)

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis and Safety Design Basis Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1104-2009 May 2009 Superseding DOE-STD-1104-96 DOE STANDARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS AND SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1104-2009 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards web page at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1104-2009 iii CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. v INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................

451

South Carolina Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel All Sales/Deliveries by ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

South Carolina Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier (Thousand Gallons per Day)

452

Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Climate Change 2001: Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis Get Javascript Other reports in this collection 4. Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases Contents Executive Summary 4.1 Introduction 4.1.1 Sources of Greenhouse Gases 4.1.2 Atmospheric Chemistry and Feedbacks 4.1.3 Trace Gas Budgets and Trends 4.1.4 Atmospheric Lifetimes and Time-Scales 4.2 Trace Gases: Current Observations, Trends and Budgets 4.2.1 Non-CO2 Kyoto Gases 4.2.1.1 Methane (CH4) 4.2.1.2 Nitrous oxide (N2O) 4.2.1.3 Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) 4.2.1.4 Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) 4.2.2 Montreal Protocol Gases and Stratospheric Ozone (O3) 4.2.3 Reactive Gases 4.2.3.1 Carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2) 4.2.3.2 Volatile organic compounds (VOC) 4.2.3.3 Nitrogen oxides (NOx)

453

Technical Basis for U. S. Department of Energy Nuclear Safety...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Basis for U. S. Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy, DOE Policy 420.1, 711 Technical Basis for U. S. Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy, DOE Policy 420.1,...

454

Business Case Slide 27: High-Value: Semiconductors - Basis for...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Semiconductors - Basis for Use Basis for use DUO2 has good electronic properties for semi-conductor applications Have made and tested a diode and transistor which appear superior...

455

Authorization basis status report (miscellaneous TWRS facilities, tanks and components)  

SciTech Connect

This report presents the results of a systematic evaluation conducted to identify miscellaneous TWRS facilities, tanks and components with potential needed authorization basis upgrades. It provides the Authorization Basis upgrade plan for those miscellaneous TWRS facilities, tanks and components identified.

Stickney, R.G.

1998-04-29T23:59:59.000Z

456

Project Hanford nuclear facilities list and authorization basis information  

SciTech Connect

Rev. 4 documents and updates the Nuclear Facilities list and associated Authorization Basis (AB) information for applicable Project Hanford facilities.

EVANS, C.B.

1999-03-03T23:59:59.000Z

457

A Cautionary Tale of Two Basis Sets and Graphene  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Density functional theory is a leading approach for simulating materials. However, the basis set used in calculations can directly affect our understanding of a material. By comparing two basis sets for graphene, this highlights an important subtle point ... Keywords: Density functional theory, basis set, graphene, electronic structure, computational materials science, scientific computing

Derek Stewart

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

Skew-Radial Basis Function Expansions for Empirical Modeling  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We propose a skew-radial basis function (sRBF) expansion for the empirical model fitting problem. sRBFs employ a standard radial term, which is now made asymmetric by modulating, or skewing it with another function. The additional parameters in the skewing ... Keywords: data fitting, data interpolation, function approximation, manifold learning, radial basis function, skew-radial basis function

Arta A. Jamshidi; Michael J. Kirby

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

459

Minimal Realizations of Linear Systems: The "Shortest Basis" Approach  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Given a discrete-time linear system C, a shortest basis for C is a set of linearly independent generators for C with the least possible lengths. A basis B is a shortest basis if and only if it has the predictable span ...

Forney, G. David, Jr.

460

Beyond Design Basis Events Analysis and Response Information | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Beyond Design Basis Events Analysis Beyond Design Basis Events Analysis and Response Information Beyond Design Basis Events Analysis and Response Information September 19-20, 2012 Beyond Design Basis Events Analysis and Response Information DOE's Safety Bulletin No. 2011-01, Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis, March 2011 DOE's Nuclear Safety Workshop Newsletter, June 2011 2011 Nuclear Safety Workshop Presentations, June 2011 Transmittal Memorandum, Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events, September 2011 Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events, August 2011 NRC Report - Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century; The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

CRAD, Engineering Design and Safety Basis - December 22, 2009 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Engineering Design and Safety Basis - December 22, 2009 Engineering Design and Safety Basis - December 22, 2009 CRAD, Engineering Design and Safety Basis - December 22, 2009 December 22, 2009 Engineering Design and Safety Basis Inspection Criteria, Inspection Activities, and Lines of Inquiry (HSS CRAD 64-19, Rev. 0) The engineering design and safety basis inspection will evaluate the effectiveness of programs and processes for the design and safety basis of selected safety structures, systems, and components (SSCs) of a nuclear facility. The nuclear facility may be an existing facility, a major modification to an existing facility, or a new facility under construction. Accordingly, the safety basis for the facility, for example, a documented safety analysis (DSA) or a preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA),

462

CRAD, Engineering Design and Safety Basis - December 22, 2009 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Engineering Design and Safety Basis - December 22, 2009 Engineering Design and Safety Basis - December 22, 2009 CRAD, Engineering Design and Safety Basis - December 22, 2009 December 22, 2009 Engineering Design and Safety Basis Inspection Criteria, Inspection Activities, and Lines of Inquiry (HSS CRAD 64-19, Rev. 0) The engineering design and safety basis inspection will evaluate the effectiveness of programs and processes for the design and safety basis of selected safety structures, systems, and components (SSCs) of a nuclear facility. The nuclear facility may be an existing facility, a major modification to an existing facility, or a new facility under construction. Accordingly, the safety basis for the facility, for example, a documented safety analysis (DSA) or a preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA),

463

Supersymmetry and Gauge Invariance Constraints in a U(1)$\\times $U(1)$^{\\prime }$-Higgs Superconducting Cosmic String Model  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A supersymmetric extension of the $U(1)\\times U(1)^{\\prime }$-Higgs bosonic superconducting cosmic string model is considered,and the constraints imposed upon such a model due to renormalizability, supersymmetry, and gauge invariance are examined. For a simple model with a single $U(1)$ chiral superfield and a single $% U(1)^{\\prime }$ chiral superfield, the Witten mechanism for bosonic superconductivity (giving rise to long range gauge fields outside of the string) does not exist. The simplest model that can accommodate the requisite interactions requires five chiral supermultiplets. This superconducting cosmic string solution is investigated.

J. R. Morris

1995-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

464

Results from Beyond Design Basis Event Pilots | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Results from Beyond Design Basis Event Pilots Results from Beyond Design Basis Event Pilots Results from Beyond Design Basis Event Pilots September 19, 2012 Presenter: Mike Hillman, Program Manager, Office of Health, Safety and Security, US Department of Energy Topics covered: Update DOE safety analysis and emergency management requirements/guidance and perform pilot applications Perform system walkdowns and evaluations at several Cat 1 and 2 DOE nuclear facilities to assess potential susceptibilities to natural phenomena hazards and external BDBEs Conduct emergency drills and exercises at DOE sites with nuclear facilities, focusing on BDBEs Results from Beyond Design Basis Event Pilots More Documents & Publications Development of Guidance for Analysis of Beyond Design Basis Events Report to the Secretary of Energy on Beyond Design Basis Event Pilot

465

SRS FTF Section 3116 Basis for Determination | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FTF Section 3116 Basis for Determination FTF Section 3116 Basis for Determination SRS FTF Section 3116 Basis for Determination Basis for Section 3116 Determination for Closure of F-Tank Farm at the Savannah River Site. In accordance with NDAA Section 3116, certain waste from reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel is not high-level waste if the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the NRC, determines that the criteria in NDAA Section 3116(a) are met. This FTF 3116 Basis Document shows that those criteria are satisfied, to support a determination that the Secretary may make pursuant to NDAA Section 3116. This FTF 3116 Basis Document concerns the stabilized residuals in waste tanks and ancillary structures, those waste tanks, and the ancillary structures (including integral equipment) at the SRS FTF at the time of closure.

466

Groebner Basis Conversion with FGLM - CECM - Simon Fraser ...  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Groebner Basis Conversion with FGLM. Roman Pearce, MITACS project. Simon Fraser University. The FGLM algorithm of Faugere, Gianni, Lazard and Mora,...

467

Evaluation of Authorization Basis Management Systems and Processes...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

related to authorization basis was identified in the 1996 Office of Oversight safety management evaluation of the Pantex Plant. The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB)...

468

CRAD, Safety Basis - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility CRAD, Safety Basis - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide Conversion Facility January 2005 A section of Appendix C to...

469

Review of Safety Basis Development for the Savannah River Site...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Subject: Review of Safety Basis Development for the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility - Inspection Criteria, Approach, and Line: HS: Rev:...

470

Microsoft Word - Final_SRS_FTF_WD_Basis_March_2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TED Total Effective Dose TEDE Total Effective Dose Equivalent TER Technical Evaluation Report TNX Training and Experimental Test Facility U.S. United States Basis for Section...

471

CRAD, Review of Safety Basis Development- May 6, 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of Safety Basis Development for the Los Alamos National Laboratory Transuranic Waste Facility (HSS CRAD 45-59, Rev. 0)

472

Independent Oversight Review of Hanford Tank Farms Safety Basis...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hanford Tank Farms Safety Basis Amendment for Double-Shell Tank Ventilation System Upgrades November 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of...

473

Suppliers Quick Guide to Sandia Electronic Invoicing  

To get the most from e-invoicing please establish electronic payments directly to your bank account. To setup EFT payments please use our . EFT form.

474

Priming the Pump in the Fight against Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Ties that Bind Metals to Proteins The Ties that Bind Metals to Proteins A Novel Nanobio Catalyst for Biofuels Multiple Crystal Cavities for Unlimited X-ray Energy Resolution and Coherence An Intriguing Twist in the Structure of a Cobalt Oxide Catalyst Breaking Records in Neurological Microradiology Science Highlights Archives: 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 2001 | 2000 | 1998 | Subscribe to APS Science Highlights rss feed Priming the Pump in the Fight against Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 Bookmark and Share This ribbon diagram shows the crystal structure of the asymmetric, two-part regulator molecule Rv3066. Each subunit of Rv3066 is composed of nine α helices. Helices α1-α9 (left subunit) and α1'-α9' (right subunit) are labeled. Helices α4 through α9 contribute to the region involved in

475

Intraspecific differentiation of Aureobasidium spp. using universally primed polymerase chain reaction  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Universally primed polymerase chain reaction (UP-PCR) was used to analyze intraspecific variation in previously diagnosed biological species of yeastlike Aureobasidium fungi. No correlation between PCR-polymorphism and the origin of fungal strains was revealed. It is suggested that Aureobasidium species studied differ in the width of their ecological niches: species I is cosmopolitan, whereas species II demonstrates relative substrate specificity. The ability of different universal primers to operate as conservative or variable ones in experiments with different species and genera was confirmed. This ability is explained by different rates of evolution of amplified loci. Hybridization analysis of amplified DNA is suggested as a necessary step in classifying strains with insufficient similarity of PCR patterns as belonging to the same divergent species or to different species. 12 refs., 4 figs., 1 tab.

Mokrousov, I.V. [Pasteur Institute, St. Petersburg (Russian Federation)

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

Effect of Z Prime -mediated flavor-changing neutral current on B {yields} {pi}{pi} decays  

SciTech Connect

We study the effect of Z Prime -mediated flavor-changing neutral current on the B {yields} {pi}{pi} decays. The branching ratios of these decays can be enhanced remarkably in the nonuniversal Z Prime model. Our estimated branching ratios B(B{sup 0} {yields} {pi}{sup 0}{pi}{sup 0}) are enhanced significantly from their standard model (SM) value. For g Prime /g = 1, the branching ratios B(B{sup 0} {yields} {pi}{sup 0}{pi}{sup 0}) are very close to the recently observed experimental values and for higher values of g Prime /g branching ratios are more. Our calculated branching ratios B(B{sup 0} {yields} {pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup -}) and B(B{sup +} {yields} {pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup 0}) are also enhanced from the SM value as well as the recently observed experimental values. These enhancements of branching ratios from their SM value give the possibility of new physics.

Sahoo, S., E-mail: sukadevsahoo@yahoo.com [National Institute of Technology, Department of Physics (India); Das, C. K. [Trident Academy of Technology, Department of Physics (India); Maharana, L. [Krupajal Engineering College, Department of Physics (India)

2011-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

477

Prediction of Critical Desalination Parameters Using Radial Basis Functions Networks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Prediction of critical desalination parameters (recovery and salt rejection) of two distinct processes based on real operational data is presented. The proposed method utilizes the radial basis function network using data clustering and histogram equalization. ... Keywords: neural network, radial basis, reverse osmosis

Mutaz M. Jafar; Ali Zilouchian

2002-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

478

CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) that can be used for assessment of a contractor's Nuclear Facility Safety Basis. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis More Documents & Publications CRAD, Facility Safety - Unreviewed Safety Question Requirements Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 FAQS Job Task Analyses - Nuclear Safety Specialist

479

Exploring continuum structures with a pseudo-state basis  

SciTech Connect

The ability of a recently developed square-integrable discrete basis to represent the properties of the continuum of a two-body system is investigated. The basis is obtained performing a simple analytic local scale transformation to the harmonic oscillator basis. Scattering phase-shifts and the electric transition probabilities B(E1) and B(E2) have been evaluated for several potentials using the proposed basis. Both quantities are found to be in excellent agreement with the exact values calculated from the true scattering states. The basis has been applied to describe the projectile continuum in the {sup 6}He scattering by {sup 12}C and {sup 208}Pb targets at 240 MeV/nucleon and the {sup 11}Be scattering by {sup 12}C at 67 MeV/nucleon. The calculated breakup differential cross sections are found to be in very good agreement with the available experimental data for these reactions.

Lay, J. A.; Moro, A. M.; Arias, J. M.; Gomez-Camacho, J. [Departamento de FAMN, Facultad de Fisica, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. 1065, E-41080 Sevilla (Spain); Departamento de FAMN, Facultad de Fisica, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. 1065, E-41080 Sevilla, Spain and Centro Nacional de Aceleradores, Avda. Thomas A. Edison, E-41092, Sevilla (Spain)

2010-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

480

CRAD, Safety Basis - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Basis - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Basis - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility CRAD, Safety Basis - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for an assessment of the Safety Basis portion of an Operational Readiness Review at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Safety Basis - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "basis prime supplier" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Production Network Supplier Characterization Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... and compare energy and material efficiency across supply chain. No standard activities are presently identified for production network resilience ...

2012-05-29T23:59:59.000Z

482

Microsoft Word - Final_SRS_FTF_WD_Basis_March_2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2-001 2-001 Revision 0 Basis for Section 3116 Determination for Closure of F-Tank Farm at the Savannah River Site March 2012 Basis for Section 3116 Determination DOE/SRS-WD-2012-001 for Closure of F-Tank Farm Revision 0 at the Savannah River Site March 2012 Page ii REVISION SUMMARY REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE OF ISSUE 0 Initial Issue March 2012 Basis for Section 3116 Determination DOE/SRS-WD-2012-001 for Closure of F-Tank Farm Revision 0 at the Savannah River Site March 2012 Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REVISION SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ vi

483

Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project Safety Basis Implementation Strategy  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The objective of the Safety Basis Implementation is to ensure that implementation of activities is accomplished in order to support readiness to move spent fuel from K West Basin. Activities may be performed directly by the Safety Basis Implementation Team or they may be performed by other organizations and tracked by the Team. This strategy will focus on five key elements, (1) Administration of Safety Basis Implementation (general items), (2) Implementing documents, (3) Implementing equipment (including verification of operability), (4) Training, (5) SNF Project Technical Requirements (STRS) database system.

TRAWINSKI, B.J.

2000-02-08T23:59:59.000Z

484

Perspective on Beyond Design Basis Event Analysis and Response | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Perspective on Beyond Design Basis Event Analysis and Response Perspective on Beyond Design Basis Event Analysis and Response Perspective on Beyond Design Basis Event Analysis and Response September 20, 2012 Presenter: John Schwenker, Nuclear Safety Manager for Liquid Operations, Savannah River Remediation, LLC, Savannah River Site Topics Covered: Waste Tanks can contain up to 1.3 Millions Gallons of highly radioactive waste (sludge, salt, supernate). Type III/IIIA Waste Tank Structures and berms are PC-3 Qualified. Tanks may fail in a Beyond Design Basis Seismic Event. Waste could flow above ground to streams and rivers. Unmitigated Tank Explosion exceeds offsite Evaluation Guidelines Hydrogen gas can be trapped in the sludge and saltcake structure. Seismic Event can cause a prompt release of trapped hydrogen. It is not physically practical to install a ventilation system that

485

Development of Guidance for Analysis of Beyond Design Basis Events |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Development of Guidance for Analysis of Beyond Design Basis Events Development of Guidance for Analysis of Beyond Design Basis Events Development of Guidance for Analysis of Beyond Design Basis Events Wednesday, September 19 Presenter: Dr. James O'Brien, Director, Office of Nuclear Safety, Office of Health, Safety and Security, US Department of Energy Topics covered: Types of DOE Facilities ◦ Research Reactors; ◦ Weapons disassembly, maintenance, and testing facilities; ◦ Nuclear material storage facilities; ◦ Processing facilities; and waste disposal facilities. Safety Analysis Framework ◦ DOE Nuclear Safety Policy ◦ Nuclear Safety Rule ◦ Nuclear Safety Analysis Standards ◦ Documented Safety Analysis Guide Development of Guidance for Analysis of Beyond Design Basis Events More Documents & Publications DOE's Approach to Nuclear Facility Safety Analysis and Management

486

CRAD, Safety Basis - Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II CRAD, Safety Basis - Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II February 2006 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line...

487

CRAD, Review of Safety Basis Development- October 11, 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of Safety Basis Development for the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Inspection Criteria, Approach, and Lines of Inquiry (HSS CRAD 45-55, Rev. 0)

488

A Theoretical Basis for Household Energy Conservation UsingProduct...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

A Theoretical Basis for Household Energy Conservation Using Product-Integrated Feedback Speaker(s): Teddy McCalley Date: October 11, 2002 - 12:00pm Location: Bldg. 90 Seminar Host...

489

Efficient Software Implementation for Finite Field Multiplication in Normal Basis  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Abstract. Finite field arithmetic is becoming increasingly important in today's computer systems, particularly for implementing cryptographic operations. Among various arithmetic operations, finite field multiplication is of particular interest since it is a major building block for elliptic curve cryptosystems. In this paper, we present new techniques for efficient software implementation of binary field multiplication in normal basis. Our techniques are more efficient in terms of both speed and memory compared with alternative approaches. 1 Introduction Finite field arithmetic is becoming increasingly important in today's computer systems, particularly for implementing cryptographic operations. Among the more common finite fields in cryptography are odd-characteristic finite fields of degree 1 and even-characteristic finite fields of degree greater than 1. The latter is conventionally known as GF (2m) arithmetic or binary field arithmetic. GF (2m) arithmetic is further classified according to the choice of basis for representing elements of the finite field; two common choices are polynomial basis and normal basis. Fast implementation techniques for GF (2m) arithmetic have been studied intensively in the past twenty years. Among various arithmetic operations, GF (2m) multiplication has attracted most of the attention since it is a major building block for implementing elliptic curve cryptosystems. Depending on the choice of basis, the mathematical formula for a GF (2m) multiplication can be quite different, thus making major differences in practical implementation. Currently, it seems that normal basis representation (especially optimal normal basis) offers the best performance in hardware [9-11], while in software polynomial basis representation is more efficient [2, 3, 8].

Peng Ning; Yiqun Lisa Yin

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

490

Technical Basis Document for PFP Area Monitoring Dosimetry Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document describes the phantom dosimetry used for the PFP Area Monitoring program and establishes the basis for the Plutonium Finishing Plant's (PFP) area monitoring dosimetry program in accordance with the following requirements: Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), part 835, ''Occupational Radiation Protection'' Part 835.403; Hanford Site Radiological Control Manual (HSRCM-1), Part 514; HNF-PRO-382, Area Dosimetry Program; and PNL-MA-842, Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual.

COOPER, J.R.

2000-04-17T23:59:59.000Z

491

Authorization basis supporting documentation for plutonium finishing plant  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The identification and definition of the authorization basis for the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) facility and operations are essential for compliance to DOE Order 5480.21, Unreviewed Safety Questions. The authorization basis, as defined in the Order, consists of those aspects of the facility design basis, i.e., the structures, systems and components (SSCS) and the operational requirements that are considered to be important to the safety of operations and are relied upon by DOE to authorize operation of the facility. These facility design features and their function in various accident scenarios are described in WHC-SD-CP-SAR-021, Plutonium Finishing Plant Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Chapter 9, `Accident Analysis.` Figure 1 depicts the relationship of the Authorization Basis to its components and other information contained in safety documentation supporting the Authorization Basis. The PFP SSCs that are important to safety, collectively referred to as the `Safety Envelope` are discussed in various chapters of the FSAR and in WHC-SD-CP-OSR-010, Plutonium Finishing Plant Operational Safety Requirements. Other documents such as Criticality Safety Evaluation Reports (CSERS) address and support some portions of the Authorization Basis and Safety Envelope.

King, J.P., Fluor Daniel Hanford

1997-03-05T23:59:59.000Z

492

Indochina becoming prime target for foreign investment in E and D  

SciTech Connect

This paper reports that Indochina is emerging as a prime target for investment in oil and gas exploration and development. The Southeast Asian subcontinent offers sharp contrasts: the booming, market oriented economy of Thailand with its friendly climate for foreign investment, compared with the flagging socialist economies of Myanmar (formerly Burma), Cambodia, Laos, and Viet Nam. The contrast extends to the Thai energy sector as well. Aggressive development of Thailand's gas reserves with foreign assistance and capital underpins the buoyant Thai economy and has helped it reduce its dependence on imports to 40% of total energy demand. That contrast may also give impetus to a window of opportunity for oil and gas companies to participate in little tested or rank exploration plays elsewhere in the region. Except for Thailand, the region has seen little exploration and almost none by private companies since the early 1970s. The other countries are just beginning to emerge from years of international isolation caused by war or civil strife, and some are seeking foreign private investment in oil and natural gas for the first time in more than a decade. The need for hard currency capital is keen. Accordingly, industry officials point to nations such as Cambodia offering among the most attractive terms for oil and gas investment in the world.

1992-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

493

Characteristics of polymorphism at a VNTR locus 3[prime] to the apolipoprotein B gene in five human populations  

SciTech Connect

The authors have analyzed the allele frequency distribution at the hypervariable locus 3[prime] to the apolipoprotein B gene (ApoB 3[prime] VNTR) in five well-defined human populations (Kacharis of northeast India, New Guinea Highlanders of Papua New Guinea, Dogrib Indians of Canada, Pehuenche Indians of Chile, and a relatively homogeneous Caucasian population of northern German extraction) by using the PCR technique. A total of 12 segregating alleles were detected in the pooled sample of 319 individuals. A fairly consistent bimodal pattern of allele frequency distribution, apparent in most of these geographically and genetically diverse populations, suggests that the ApoB 3[prime] VNTR polymorphism predates the geographic dispersal of ancestral human populations. In spite of the observed high degree of polymorphism at this locus (expected heterozygosity levels 55%-78%), the genotype distributions in all populations (irrespective of their tribal or cosmopolitan nature) conform to their respective Hardy-Weinberg predictions. Furthermore, analysis of the congruence between expected heterozygosity and the observed number of alleles reveals that, in general, the allele frequency distributions at this locus are in agreement with the predictions of the classical mutation-drift models. The data also show that alleles that are shared by all populations have the highest average frequency within populations. These findings demonstrate the potential utility of highly informative hypervariable loci such as the ApoB 3[prime] VNTR locus in population genetic research, as well as in forensic medicine and determination of biological relatedness of individuals. 38 refs., 2 figs., 3 tabs.

Deka, R.; DeCroo, S.; Ferrell, R.E. (Univ. of Pittsburgh, PA (United States)); Chakraborty, R.; Barton, S.A. (Univ. of Texas, Houston (United States)); Rothhammer, F. (Universidad de Chile, Santiago (Chile))

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

494

CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reactor Contractor ORR Reactor Contractor ORR CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Contractor ORR February 2007 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a February 2007 assessment of the Safety Basis portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Contractor ORR More Documents & Publications CRAD, Engineering - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor

495

BASIS: Backscattering Spectrometer at SNS | ORNL Neutron Sciences  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Backscattering Spectrometer Backscattering Spectrometer View inside the BAIS tank View inside the BASIS tank. BASIS is a near-backscattering, crystal-analyzer spectrometer that provides very fine energy resolution, as low as 3.0 to 3.5 µeV at the elastic peak (depending on sample size). This requires a long initial guide section of 84 m from moderator to sample in order to achieve the timing resolution necessary for obtaining the desired energy resolution. BASIS provides an excellent dynamic range near the elastic peak of about plus and minus 100 µeV in the standard high-intensity operation regime, which, if needed, could be extended to plus and minus 200 µeV and beyond. The spectrometer is optimized for quasielastic scattering but provides about 0.1% resolution in energy transfers up to ~40 meV; the inelastic excitations need to be

496

SAFETY BASIS DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES IMECE2007-42747  

SciTech Connect

'Designing in Safety' is a desired part of the development of any new potentially hazardous system, process, or facility. It is a required part of nuclear safety activities as specified in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 420.B, Facility Safety. This order addresses the design of nuclear related facilities developed under federal regulation IOCFR830, Nuclear Safety Management. IOCFR830 requires that safety basis documentation be provided to identify how nuclear safety is being adequately addressed as a condition for system operation (e.g., the safety basis). To support the development of the safety basis, a safety analysis is performed. Although the concept of developing a design that addresses 'Safety is simple, the execution can be complex and challenging. This paper addresses those complexities and challenges for the design activity of a system to treat sludge, a corrosion product of spent nuclear fuel, at DOE's Hanford Site in Washington State. The system being developed is referred to as the Sludge Treatment Project (STP). This paper describes the portion of the safety analysis that addresses the selection of design basis events using the experience gained from the STP and the development of design requirements for safety features associated with those events. Specifically, the paper describes the safety design process and the application of the process for two types of potential design basis accidents associated with the operation of the system, (1) flashing spray leaks and (2) splash and splatter leaks. Also presented are the technical challenges that are being addressed to develop effective safety features to deal with these design basis accidents.

RYAN GW

2007-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

497

The Functional Requirements and Design Basis for Information Barriers  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes the results of the Information Barrier Working Group workshop held at Sandia National Laboratory in Albuquerque, NM, February 2-4, 1999. This workshop was convened to establish the functional requirements associated with warhead radiation signature information barriers, to identify the major design elements of any such system or approach, and to identify a design basis for each of these major elements. Such information forms the general design basis to be used in designing, fabricating, and evaluating the complete integrated systems developed for specific purposes.

Fuller, James L.

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

498

A Radial Basis Function Method for Global Optimization  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We introduce a method that aims to find the global minimum of a continuous nonconvex function on a compact subset of \\dRd. It is assumed that function evaluations are expensive and that no additional information is available. ... Keywords: Global optimization, P-algorithm, interpolation, radial basis functions

H.-M. Gutmann

2001-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

499

Hierarchical Structure for function approximation using radial basis function  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The hierarchial network proposed (Multi-RBFNN), is composed of complete Radial Basis Function Neural Networks (RBFNNs) that are in charge of a reduced set of input variables with the property of which every Sub-RBFNN can take charge of a set of input ... Keywords: function approximation, hierarchical architectures, input variable selection, radial bases functions

A. Awad; H. Pomares; I. Rojas; L. J. Herrera; A. Guillen; O. Valenzuela

2005-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

500

Canister Storage Building (CSB) Design Basis Accident Analysis Documentation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document provided the detailed accident analysis to support HNF-3553, Spent Nuclear Fuel Project Final Safety Analysis Report, Annex A, ''Canister Storage Building Final Safety Analysis Report''. All assumptions, parameters, and models used to provide the analysis of the design basis accidents are documented to support the conclusions in the Canister Storage Building Final Safety Analysis Report.

CROWE, R.D.; PIEPHO, M.G.

2000-03-23T23:59:59.000Z