Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Audit Report - Office of Secure Transportation Capabilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Secure Transportation Office of Secure Transportation Capabilities OAS-M-12-05 June 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 29, 2012 UN MEMORANDUM FOR THE ASSISTANT DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR, OFFICE OF SECURE TRANSPORTATION FROM: George W. Collard Assistant Inspector General for Audits Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Office of Secure Transportation Capabilities" BACKGROUND The National Nuclear Security Administration's Office of Secure Transportation (OST) is responsible for safely and securely transporting nuclear weapons, weapon components and special nuclear material for customers such as the Department of Energy, Department of Defense and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Specifically, OST shipments support the nuclear

2

DATE: October 3, 2003 Audit Report Number: OAS-L-04-01 REPLY TO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8,, 8,, United ,tates Government Department of Energ memorandum DATE: October 3, 2003 Audit Report Number: OAS-L-04-01 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-35 (A03DC010) SUBJECT: Audit of "Audit of Resolution of Safety Deficiencies" TO: Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health Director, Policy and Internal Controls Management Director, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Director, Office of Science INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy (Department) is responsible for ensuring the safety and health of people who work at and live near its facilities. A primary means of carrying out this responsibility is through the conduct of both internal and independent evaluations to identify safety deficiencies. Many systems, both at the contractor and Department sites,

3

Memorandum DATE: April 19, 2004 Audit Report Number: OAS-L-04-14  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SDOW F 1325 8 SDOW F 1325 8 TF, 07-,O C) SUnited States Government -Department of Jaw y Memorandum DATE: April 19, 2004 Audit Report Number: OAS-L-04-14 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-30 SUBJECT: Review of Selected Issues Pertaining to Vapor Inhalation Allegations at the Hanford Site TO: Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE In May 2003, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) initiated a Department-wide audit addressing whether the Department's Computerized Accident/Incident Reporting System (CAIRS) contained accurate data. During the course of this audit, the OIG became aware of concerns regarding safety and health matters at the Hanford Site. At the request of the Secretary of Energy, the OIG subsequently began a criminal investigation into related allegations publicized in a September 2003 report issued by

4

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the Plutonium of the Plutonium Finishing Plant Closure Project OAS-RA-L-11-01 November 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: November 10, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-01 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A10RA040) SUBJECT: Report on "Management of the Plutonium Finishing Plant Closure Project" TO: Manager, Richland Operations Office INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy's (Department) Richland Operations Office (Richland) awarded a contract, effective October 1, 2008, to CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) to remediate the Hanford Site's Central Plateau. Part of the contract's scope includes completion of the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) Closure Project - a major

5

United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: May 15, 2006 Audit Report Number: OAS-L-06-14  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: May 15, 2006 Audit Report Number: OAS-L-06-14 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A05TG027) SUBJECT: Report on Audit of "The Department's Development and Implementation of the Corporate Human Resource Information System" TO: Chief Financial Officer, CF-1 Chief Human Capital Officer, HR-1 Chief Information Officer, IM-1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy (Department) began the development of its Corporate Human Resource Information System (CHRIS) in 1996. It is the official human resource system of record for the Department's Federal employees. CHRIS consists of several components, including the Human Resource Management System, which maintains training and personnel records; Employee Self Service, which provides employees with web-based access to personnel and payroll data

6

Office of Inspector General audit report on small disadvantaged business program at the Chicago Operations Office  

SciTech Connect

The Office of Inspector General performed audits of the Small Disadvantaged Business Program at five management and operating contractors in FY 1994. The audits disclosed that none of the contractors fully met the intent of the Act and implementing regulations. The contractors awarded some subcontracts to firms of questionable program eligibility. Also, two of the contractors concentrated awards among a limited number of small disadvantaged businesses, and used procurement practices that precluded opportunities for many small disadvantaged businesses to participate. The objective of this audit was to determine whether Chicago was providing the maximum practicable opportunity for small disadvantaged businesses to participate in contract awards.

NONE

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

7

Memorandum DATE: September 28, 2007 Audit Report No.: OAS-L-07-26  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: September 28, 2007 Audit Report No.: OAS-L-07-26 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A07TG029) SUBJECT: Report on "Department's Implementation of the Strategic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System - Transition Planning, Interfaces, and Testing" TO: Chief Financial Officer, CF-1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Strategic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System (STRIPES) initiative is an important component of the Department of Energy's (Department or DOE) I-MANAGE program. Consistent with the President's Management Agenda and laws such as the E-Government Act, the STRIPES project has been undertaken to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of awarding and administering acquisition instruments - including managing and operating contracts, interagency and blanket purchase

8

United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: November 20, 2003 Audit Report Number: OAS-L-04-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOb F 1325.8 DOb F 1325.8 (8-89) EFG (07-90) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: November 20, 2003 Audit Report Number: OAS-L-04-05 REPLY TO: IG-30 (A03AL036) SUBJECT: Audit of Controls Over Expenditures Within the Office of Secure Transportation TO: Michael Kane, Associate Administrator for Management and Administration INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Office of Secure Transportation (OST) supports the Department of Energy's (Department) national security core programs by safely and securely transporting nuclear weapons, special nuclear materials, and components between Department facilities and Department of Defense destinations. OST's primary field facility locations are the Transportation Safeguards Training Center

9

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Resolution Audit Resolution and Follow-up Process DOE/IG-0766 May 2007 Department sf Energy WasliingTon, DC 20585 May 2 4 , 2007 MEMORANDUM FOR THMECRE5-TARY FROM: SUBJECT: +* Greg ry . Friedman Inspector General INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department's Audit Resolution and Follow-up Process" BACKGROUND - - Over the years, the Office of Inspector General has issued findings and recoinmendations addressing numerous aspects of the Department of Energy's programs, operations and management hnctions. I n many cases, the Department has concurred with the findings and reported that corrective actions to resolve problems or improve the efficiency of its operations have been implemented. Clearly, ensuring that identified internal control

10

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services Recovery of Highly Enriched Uranium Provided to Foreign Countries DOEIG-O638 February 2004...

11

United States Government. Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: September 28, 2007 Audit Report No.: OAS-L-07-25  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Government. Department of Energy Government. Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: September 28, 2007 Audit Report No.: OAS-L-07-25 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A07TG028) SUBJECT: Report on Audit of "Remote Access to the Department's Unclassified Information Systems" TO: Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration, NA-1 Under Secretary for Science, SC-1 Acting Under Secretary of Energy, NE-1 Chief Information Officer, IM-1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE To help accomplish its strategic goals and mission requirements, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) utilizes numerous interconnected computer networks and individual systems, including ones accessed remotely. While remote access by authorized individuals can provide numerous advantages such as the capability to perform business-related functions, retrieve electronic mail, and access business

12

NUCLEAR SUBSTANCE LABORATORY SELF-AUDIT CHECKLIST Office of Environmental Health and Safety Title: Radiation Safety Self-Audit Checklist  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

NUCLEAR SUBSTANCE LABORATORY SELF-AUDIT CHECKLIST Office of Environmental Health and Safety Title for Handling Packages Containing Nuclear Substances" posters posted. Storage area signed, included 24 hour contact information Nuclear Substance Permit and all attachments posted (eg. Conditions ­ general, special

Beaumont, Christopher

13

Report on Audit of the Department of Energy Program Offices' Use of Management and Operating Contractor Employees, IG-0392  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PROGRAM OFFICES' USE OF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distrution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the

14

Audit Report on "Credit Card Usage at the Ohio Field Office and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report on "Credit Card Usage at the Ohio Field Office and the Fernald and Miamisburg Environmental Management Projects," ER-B-99-04 Audit Report on "Credit Card Usage at the Ohio...

15

Audit of Department of Energy Support Service Contracting, CR-B-95-06  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SUPPORT SERVICE CONTRACTING Report Number: Capital Regional Audit Office Date of Issue: Germantown, MD 20874 REPORT NO. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RELEASE DATE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL CR-B-95-06 JUNE 30, 1995 _________________________________________________________________ _______________________ AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SUPPORT SERVICE CONTRACTING

16

Audit Report: Modular Office Facilities for Recovery Act Program Activities at the Hanford Site, OAS-RA-13-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Audit Report Modular Office Facilities for Recovery Act Program Activities at the Hanford Site OAS-RA-L-13-04 July 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 9, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo, Director Western Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Modular Office Facilities for Recovery Act Program Activities at the Hanford Site" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Richland Operations Office (Richland) awarded a contract, effective October 1, 2008, to CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) to remediate select portions of the Hanford Site's Central Plateau. As part of the American Recovery and

17

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Audit Services  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management Challenges at the Management Challenges at the Department of Energy DOE/IG-0580 December 2002 Audit Report Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Performance Management DOE/IG-0627 November 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 24, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAI COMMISSION FROM: Gregory H. Friedman N, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Performance Management" BACKGROUND The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, as an independent, five-member body, regulates certain aspects of the oil, natural gas, and electricity industries, and licenses hydroelectric projects. As required by the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, the Commission developed performance goals in four major areas to help guide

18

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary of Special Report Summary of Special Report National Security Technologies, LLC Internal Audit Implementation Design This document provides a summary of a Special Report that is not publicly releasable. Public release is controlled pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. OAS-M-07-05 August 2007 This is u surnrnurji of Special Report, OAS-M-07-Oj, entitled "Nutional Security Tec/znofog~es, L2LC' Internrrl Audit Implementatiotl Design." The rotnplete report is not rr\~uiluble.for public disclosure. BACKGROUND Generally accepted government auditing standards and the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards) require audit activities to be independent and auditors to be objective in performing their

19

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Services Audit Services Audit Report The Department of Energy's Management of Contractor Fines, Penalties and Legal Costs Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 30,2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: 46 Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Management of Contractor Fines, Penalties and Legal Costs" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy reimburses its facility contractors for millions of dollars in settlement costs and for fees paid to outside law firms for legal research, litigation and consulting activities. Because of contract reform initiatives, the Department increased contractor financial responsibility for certain legal costs. For example, fines and penalties for violations of laws and regulations, which totaled almost $12 million over the

20

Audit of the Richland Operations Office Site Characterization Program, IG-0368  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 1995 0, 1995 IG-1 INFORMATION: Report on "Audit of the Richland Operations Office Site Characterization Program" The Secretary BACKGROUND: With its designation as an environmental cleanup site in 1989, the Hanford Site has represented a major activity of the Department of Energy (Department). The final cleanup of this site is estimated to take over 50 years and cost close to $100 billion. Although there are many factors influencing the operations at Hanford, the Department and the Richland Operations Office (Richland) are ultimately responsible for its success. The Department and Richland are responsible for establishing procedures that ensure program goals are accomplished using the most cost-effective methods. DISCUSSION:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Office of Inspector General audit report on Bechtel Jacobs payroll creation  

SciTech Connect

The Oak Ridge Operations Office (Operations Office) awarded a contract to the Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC (Bechtel Jacobs) in December 1997. The terms of the contract require Bechtel Jacobs to create new jobs in the Oak Ridge area with a cumulative payroll of $427 million through Fiscal year (FY) 2003. In FY 1998, the contract required Bechtel Jacobs to create $11 million in new payroll. The objective of the audit was to determine if Bechtel Jacobs met its commitment to create at least $11 million in new payroll in the Oak Ridge, Tennessee area through September 30, 1998.

1999-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

22

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 440.2B-1A 9-19-05 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE AVIATION PROGRAM PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (METRICS) for use with DOE O 440.2B, Aviation Management and Safety [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and may not be construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: www.directives.doe.gov Office of Aviation Management/OMBE/CFO DOE G 440.2B-1A i (and ii) 9-19-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Aviation Program performance indicators interim guide is approved by the Office of Aviation Management (OAM) and is available for use by all DOE and

23

NSTec Internal Audit  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: June 8, 2011 Audit Report Number: OAS- L-11-04 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-36 (A10LV009) SUBJECT: Audit Report on the "Follow-up Audit of National Nuclear Security Administration's Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Program" TO: Manager, Pantex Site Office INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE One of the primary missions of the Department of Energy's (Department) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is to maintain the safety, security, and reliability of the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile. Many of the nuclear explosive operations related to this mission, including assembly, disassembly, surveillance, refurbishment, and dismantlement of nuclear weapons, are performed at the Pantex Plant

24

/ United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: August 8, 2005 Audit Report Number OAS-L-05-12  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Government Department of Energy United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: August 8, 2005 Audit Report Number OAS-L-05-12 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-32 (A05AL036) SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Limited Life Component Exchange Program" TO: Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs, National Nuclear Security Administration INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The goal of the Limited Life Component Exchange (LLCE) Program is to schedule, build and deliver limited life components such as tritium reservoirs and neutron generators. In order for weapon systems to remain operational, these components must be periodically replaced. The objective of this audit was to determine whether the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) limited life component exchange program has sufficient capacity to provide all components needed to meet stockpile requirements.

25

Report on Matters Identified at the Rocky Flats Field Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996 Financial Statements, WR-FS-97-03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE ROCKY FLATS FIELD OFFICE DURING THE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENTmS CONSOLIDATED FISCAL YEAR 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its audit reports as customer friendly and cost effective as

26

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 DATE: April 25, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) - Public Access SUMMARY: On April 15, 2011, the public side of the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) website was launched. This means that information posted to FAPIIS on and after this date, with the exception of past performance reviews, will be accessible by the public. Public access to information posted to FAPIIS prior to April 15, 2011, will be subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) process. (See paragraph (b)(3) of

27

Audit of the Contractor Incentive Program at the Nevada Operations Office, IG-0412  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20, 1997 20, 1997 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: John C. Layton Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on "Audit of the Contractor Incentive Program at the Nevada Operations Office" BACKGROUND: The Department of Energy (Department) is using performance-based contracts to address problems associated with its traditional management and operating contracts. Under this approach, contractor performance is to be evaluated against performance measures which are clearly stated, results-oriented, and established prior to performance. The performance measures, which reflect the Department's expectations of the contractor, are the basis for rewarding superior contractor performance

28

Audit of Program Administration by the Office of Energy Research, IG-0376  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1995 1995 IG-1 INFORMATION: "Audit of Program Administration by the Office of Energy Research" The Secretary BACKGROUND: Congressional and Departmental initiatives envision improved contract and program performance by requiring program managers to set measurable performance expectations. Congress recognized the need for performance expectations in passing Public Law 103D62 entitled "Government Performance and Results Act of 1993." The Act required agencies to set performance goals, measure program performance against those goals, and report publicly on program progress. Also, the Department's Contract Reform Team noted that the pursuit and use of clear expectations, accurate performance metrics, and evaluation

29

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61 61 DATE: June 19, 2013 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 and How It Affects Federal Employee Non-Disclosure Policies, Forms, Certificates, Agreements and Acknowledgments SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2013-08 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2013-05 provide Contracting Officers with notice of the recently passed, Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 (WPEA), Pub.L. 112- 199, and the DOECAST issued in response on April 24, 2013. This AL/FAL informs DOE/NNSA Contracting Officers to update any Non-Disclosure Policies, Forms, Certificates, Agreements, and Acknowledgements

30

Office of Inspector General audit report on credit card usage at the Ohio Field Office and the Fernald and Miamisburg Environmental Management Projects  

SciTech Connect

In 1994 the Department of Energy (Department) obtained the services of Rocky Mountain BankCard System, through the use of a General Services Administration contract, as a means for the Department and its contractors to make small purchases. The use of credit cards was expected to simplify small purchase procedures and improve cash management. The Ohio Field Office (Field Office) uses the credit card system and oversees usage by its area offices. Contractors under the Field Office also use the credit card system to make small purchases. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued one audit report concerning the use of credit cards. In April 1996, the OIG issued Report WR-B-96-06, Audit of Bonneville Power Administration`s Management of Information Resources. The audit concluded that improvements could be made in implementing credit card and property procedures in Bonneville`s management of computer-related equipment. Specifically, many credit card purchases were made by employees whose authority to buy was not properly documented, and the purchasing files often lacked invoices that would show what was purchased. Additionally, some cardholders split purchases to avoid credit card limits. The objective of this audit was to determine whether the Field Office, Fernald and Miamisburg Environmental Management Projects, Fluor Daniel, and B and W were using credit cards for the appropriate purposes and within the limitations established by Federal and Departmental regulations.

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

31

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 DATE: May 12, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Letter AL 2011-05/Financial Acquisition Letter FAL 2011-01 Congressional Notification of Pending Award of a Contract Action, Announcement of Selected Applications for Negotiation of Financial Assistance Awards, or to Award a Financial Assistance Action in excess of $1 Million SUMMARY: AL 2011-05/FAL 2011-01 (AL/FAL) implements statutory and non-statutory Congressional notification of pending award of a contract action, announcement of selected applications for negotiation of financial assistance awards, or to award a financial assistance

32

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-45 3-45 DATE: April 16, 2013 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 15.1 Source Selection Guide SUMMARY: Attached is a revised Source Selection Guide. The Guide has been updated to reflect changes to DOE policies and practices and includes new topics such as Flow of the Source Selection Process, Source Selection Official Designation, Confidentiality and Conflict of Interest Certificates, Source Selection Training and Roles and Responsibilities. This Flash and its attachments will be available online within a day, at the following website: http://energy.gov/management/office-management/operational-

33

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATE: DATE: AUG 12 1991 REPLY TO ATTN OF: EM-421 (J. Wagoner, 3-8147) SUBIECT: Elimination of the Duriron Company Site TO: The File I have reviewed the attached site summary and elimination recommendation for the Duriron Company Site in Dayton, Ohio. I have determined that there is little likelihood of radioactive contamination at this site. Based on the above, the Ouriron Company Site is hereby eliminated from further consideration under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. W. Ale~ander~illiams,~PhD Designation and Certification Manager Off-Site Branch Division of Eastern Area Programs Office of Environmental Restoration Attachment -: bee: Weston EM-40 (2) P. Hevner Review: - OTS NOTE DATE: July 15, 1991 TO: Alexander WiTliams FROM: Dan Stou tF

34

Key Dates | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Key Dates Key Dates Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship (AEF) Program Einstein Fellowship Home Eligibility Benefits Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Key Dates Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Key Dates for the 2014-2015 Einstein Fellowship Application process. On-line Application Opens September 24, 2013 Application Deadline 5:00pm EST December 4, 2013 Application Review 7-8 weeks Notification to Semi-Finalists [Travel Arrangements made for Interviews in Washington, DC] Late January 2014 Interviews in Washington, DC February 23-25, 2014 Finalists Notifications March 2014 Congressional Fellows Placement Interviews June - July 2014 Fellows Arrive in Washington, DC August 2014 Orientation meeting for the 2014-2015 Einstein Fellows

35

Key Dates | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Key Dates Key Dates Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) SULI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Key Dates Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page At the submission deadline (shown in red) the application system will close, and no materials will be accepted after the submission deadline has passed. The Application System closes at 5:00 PM Eastern Time. SULI Internship Term: Spring 2014 Summer 2014* Fall 2013 On-line Application Opens August 6, 2013 October 18, 2013 May 1, 2013 Applications Due October, 1, 2013 5:00 PM ET January 10, 2014 5:00 PM ET June 12, 2013 5:00 PM ET Offer Notification Period Begins on or around October, 15, 2013 January 20, 2014 June 24, 2013

36

Key Dates | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Key Dates Key Dates Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Key Dates Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page At the submission deadline (shown in red) the application system will close, and no materials will be accepted after the submission deadline has passed. The Application System closes at 5:00 PM Eastern Time. VFP Term: Summer 2014 On-line Application Opens October 18, 2013 Applications Due January 10, 2014 5:00 PM ET* Offer Notification Period Begins January 20, 2014 All DOE Offers and Notifications Complete April 1, 2014 *A research proposal co-developed with a DOE laboratory researcher must be electronically submitted by all faculty applicants as part of their

37

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility System Leases at the East Utility System Leases at the East Tennessee Technology Park DOE/IG-0609 June 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 25, 2003 FROM: Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Utility System Leases at the East Tennessee Technology Park" BACKGROUND In 1998, the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Operations Office entered into a series of utility leases with the Community Reuse Organization of East Tennessee (CROET). Under the lease terms, CROET was to manage a variety of Government-owned utility systems - including steam, compressed air, nitrogen, water, and natural gas - at the Department's East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP). By agreement, the Department leased its utility systems to CROET at no charge. In turn, CROET was to contract with a

38

Audit Report: IG-0572 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

program-level business related systems. Audit Report: IG-0572 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0436 Office of Inspector General Quarterly Report Audit Report: IG-0686...

39

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

53 53 DATE: May 15, 2013 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: Implementation of Division F, Title I, Title II, and Title III and Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113-6 SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2013-06 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2013-04 provides implementing instructions and guidance for Division F, Title I, Title II, and Title III and Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113-6. The AL addresses the following: Appropriations Act Section 301(a) Unfunded Requests for Proposals

40

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

POLICY FLASH 2013-12 POLICY FLASH 2013-12 DATE: December 7, 2012 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: Section 301(b) Congressional Notification of Multi-year Contract Award Report Revision for Fiscal Year 2013 SUMMARY: With reference to Acquisition Letter (AL) 2012-08 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2012-02 regarding Section 301(b) Congressional Notification of Multi-year Contract Award, the spreadsheet is revised for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 reporting. The revised spreadsheet will now have 5 funding columns that must be filled in for each 301(b) notification instead of 4 columns. The amounts in columns I through L should equal to the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

POLICY FLASH 2011-96 POLICY FLASH 2011-96 DATE: August 19, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: RFP Section H Clause Templates SUMMARY: On May 3, 2011, twenty two draft Section H clause templates were distributed for Procurement Director (PD), Head of Contracting Activity (HCA), General Counsel and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) review and comment. All comments received were considered and changes were made as appropriate including the elimination of six clauses. The final version of the sixteen RFP Section H clause templates identified below will be available in STRIPES. 1) COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNET PROTOCOL VERSION 6 (IPV6) IN ACQUIRING

42

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 DATE: April 25, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Implementation of Division B, Title I, Section 1101(a)(2) of the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter 2011-04 provides implementing instructions and guidance for Section 1101(a)(2) of the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, Pub. L. 112-10 (hereinafter "Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011). Section 1101(a)(2) of the Act provides that, unless otherwise specified, the authority and conditions provided for projects or activities (including the costs of direct loans and loan guarantees) appropriated, authorized, or

43

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2- 36 2- 36 DATE: April 23, 2012 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Implementation of Division B, Title III, Title V and Division C Title VII, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, Pub. L. No.112- 74 and Related Conference Report SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2012-08 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2012-01 provides implementing instructions and guidance for Division B, Title III, Title V and Division C Title VII, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, Pub. L. No.112-74 and Related Conference Report. The AL addresses the following: Appropriations Act * Section 301(a) Unfunded Requests for Proposals

44

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22 22 DATE: February 1, 2012 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Letter AL 2012-07/Financial Acquisition Letter FAL 2012-01 Congressional Notification of Pending Award of a Contract Action, Announcement of Selected Applications for Negotiation of Financial Assistance Awards, or to Award a Financial Assistance Action in Excess of $1 Million SUMMARY: AL 2012-07/FAL 2012-01 (AL/FAL) implements statutory Congressional notification of pending award of a contract action, announcement of selected applications for negotiation of financial assistance awards, or to award a financial assistance action in excess of $1 million. The total value of the award includes options, budget periods and cost share. The

45

Public Affairs Office: Livermore Lab Physicist Dates Lifetime of Solar  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dating the Solar System: Where Were You When the Solar System Was Being Formed? Dating the Solar System: Where Were You When the Solar System Was Being Formed? Chemistry & Materials Science Directorate, LLNL Chronology of the early Solar System from chondrule-bearing calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions Nature, April 21, 2005 Building Planets at PSI: The Origin of the Solar System Planetary Science Institute Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Contact: Anne M. Stark Phone: (925) 422-9799 E-mail: stark8@llnl.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 20, 2005 NR-05-04-02 Livermore Lab physicist dates lifetime of solar nebula at two million years LIVERMORE, Calif. - The oxygen and magnesium content of some of the oldest objects in the universe are giving clues to the lifetime of the

46

Report on audit of the Department of Energy Program Offices` use of management and operating contractor employees  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (Department) and predecessor agencies established program offices at Headquarters to administer mission responsibilities in areas such as defense programs, energy efficiency and renewable energy, environmental management, energy research, and national security. These program offices relied on several hundred employees from the Department`s management and operating contractors, especially Department laboratories, to perform a variety of functions to meet mission objectives. The purpose of the audit was to review the activities of management and operating contractor employee (laboratory employee) support provided directly to Department program offices located in the Washington, D.C. area for periods of six months or longer. The objective of the audit was to assess the nature and extent of support provided by laboratory employees assigned.

NONE

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

Audit of Work Force Restructuring at the Oak Ridge Operations Office, ER-B-95-06  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF WORK FORCE RESTRUCTURING AT THE OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov Department of Energy Headquarters Anonymous FTP vm1.hqadmin.doe.gov U.S. Department of Energy Human Resources and Administration Home Page

48

Audits | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audits Audits Audits The Audit Resolution team (AR Team) manages the audit coordination and resolution activities for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE). They coordinate Recovery Act audits, non-Recovery Act audits, Single Audits and the execution of audit resolution and follow-up activities. The AR Team reviews, and evaluates program operations, activities, and internal controls to ensure effective controls and compliance with policies and best practice. The AR Team collects and validates corrective action data and artifacts to support closure of audit recommendations. Responsibilities Resolves and coordinates all audits Updates all audit statuses on relevant enterprise tracking systems Follows up and coordinates with program offices and field elements

49

Office of Inspector General audit of alternatives to testing at the Tonopah Test Range  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Since the 1950s, the Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies have done weapons program testing at the Tonopah Test Range (Tonopah). Beginning the in 1990s, DOE`s testing at Tonopah declined dramatically. This decline was coincident with the signing of various international treaties, the end of the Cold War, and the movement of some types of tests to other ranges. As a result, Tonopah was left with some bomb and work-for-others testing. The objective of this audit was to determine if there were viable, cost effective alternatives to testing at Tonopah. During the early 1990s, DOE`s Albuquerque Operations Office (Albuquerque) and Sandia National Laboratories (Sandia), which operates Tonopah for DOE, explored the alternative of testing elsewhere. Some of the data gathered by Albuquerque and Sandia provided indications that testing at another range would be practical and economical. This audit followed up on the Albuquerque/Sandia studies and also indicated that testing could be done elsewhere, at a potential cost savings of several million dollars annually. Therefore, it was recommended that Albuquerque conduct a comprehensive study of all testing alternatives. Albuquerque agreed to implement this recommendation but raised technical questions regarding issues such as environmental permits, scheduling flexibility, and cost components, which warrant a more detailed examination as part of the recommended study. It was also recommended that, if the study found that it was not feasible or economical to move the testing elsewhere, Albuquerque reduce the cost of Tonopah to the minimum level necessary to support testing requirements. Albuquerque agreed to this recommendation and stated that it and Sandia continued to actively pursue cost reductions at Tonopah.

Friedman, G.H.

1998-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

50

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

a? a? ,itbd States Government memorandum Department of Energy DATE: APR 15 893 REPLY TO EM-421 (W. Williams, 903-8149) ATTN OF: Authorization for Remedial Action at the Former Associate Aircraft Site in SUBJECT: Fairfield, Ohio TO: W. Seay, DOE Oak Ridge Field Office The former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing, Inc., site at 3660 Dixie Highway, Fairfield, Ohio, is designated for remedial action under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). Force Control Industries is the current occupant of the site. This designation is based on the results of radiological surveys and conclusions from an authority review. Copies of the radiological survey reports and the authority review are provided for information. The site has been assigned a low priority under the FUSRAP protocol. The

51

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996 Financial Statements, WR-FS-97-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE DURING THE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENT S CONSOLIDATED FISCAL YEAR 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its audit reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov

52

Audit Report on "The Office of Science's Management of Information Technology Resources"  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy's Office of Science (Science) and its facility contractors are aggressive users of information technology (IT) to support fundamental research in areas such as energy, environmental remediation and computational sciences. Of its $4 billion Fiscal Year 2008 budget, Science spent about $287 million to manage its IT program. This included cyber security activities, acquisition of hardware and software, and support service costs used to maintain the operating environments necessary to support the missions of the program. Prior Office of Inspector General reports have identified various issues with Science's management of its IT programs and resources. For instance, our report on Facility Contractor Acquisition and Management of Information Technology Hardware (DOE/IG-0768, June 2007) noted that the Science sites reviewed spent more than necessary when acquiring IT hardware. In another example, our review of The Department's Efforts to Implement Common Information Technology Services at Headquarters (DOE/IG-0763, March 2007) disclosed that Science's reluctance to adopt the Department of Energy Common Operating Environment (DOE-COE) at Headquarters contributed to the Department's inability to fully realize potential cost savings through consolidation and economies of scale. In light of the magnitude of the Office of Science IT program and previously identified program weaknesses, we initiated this audit to determine whether Science adequately managed its IT resources. Science had taken a number of actions to improve its cyber security posture and align its program to Federal requirements. Yet, our review disclosed that it had not taken some basic steps to enhance security and reduce costs. In particular, we found that: (1) For their non-scientific computing environments, all seven of the field sites reviewed (two Federal, five contractor) had implemented security configurations that were less stringent than those included in the Federal Desktop Core Configuration. This configuration was designed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology and its use was mandated by the Office of Management and Budget; (2) Although we previously highlighted weaknesses and recommended corrective actions, Science still had not fully established or enforced IT hardware standards for acquiring hardware such as desktop and laptop computers or related peripherals, contributing to significant unnecessary expenditures; and (3) While we have noted in a series of past reports that significant savings could be realized from aggregating demand for IT services and products across the enterprise, Science had not implemented a common infrastructure for users at its Federal sites and continued to maintain an IT environment independent of the Department's Common IT Operating Environment. The weaknesses identified were attributable, at least in part, to a lack of adequate policies and procedures for ensuring effective cyber security and hardware acquisition practices. In addition, Science had not effectively monitored the performance of its field sites to ensure that previously reported internal control weaknesses were addressed and had not implemented an appropriate mechanism to track its IT-related costs. Without improvements, Science may be unable to realize the benefits of improved security over its information systems, reduce costs associated with hardware acquisition, and lower IT support costs through consolidation of services. In particular, we determined that Science could potentially realize savings of more than $3.3 million over the next three years by better controlling hardware costs and implementing standards for certain equipment. Furthermore, Science could continue to pay for duplicative IT support services and fail to take advantage of opportunities to lower costs and apply potential savings to mission-related work. During the course of our audit work, we learned from Science officials that they had initiated the process of revising the Program Cyber Security Plan to better clarify its policy for implementing

None

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

Audit Report on "The Office of Science's Management of Information Technology Resources"  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy's Office of Science (Science) and its facility contractors are aggressive users of information technology (IT) to support fundamental research in areas such as energy, environmental remediation and computational sciences. Of its $4 billion Fiscal Year 2008 budget, Science spent about $287 million to manage its IT program. This included cyber security activities, acquisition of hardware and software, and support service costs used to maintain the operating environments necessary to support the missions of the program. Prior Office of Inspector General reports have identified various issues with Science's management of its IT programs and resources. For instance, our report on Facility Contractor Acquisition and Management of Information Technology Hardware (DOE/IG-0768, June 2007) noted that the Science sites reviewed spent more than necessary when acquiring IT hardware. In another example, our review of The Department's Efforts to Implement Common Information Technology Services at Headquarters (DOE/IG-0763, March 2007) disclosed that Science's reluctance to adopt the Department of Energy Common Operating Environment (DOE-COE) at Headquarters contributed to the Department's inability to fully realize potential cost savings through consolidation and economies of scale. In light of the magnitude of the Office of Science IT program and previously identified program weaknesses, we initiated this audit to determine whether Science adequately managed its IT resources. Science had taken a number of actions to improve its cyber security posture and align its program to Federal requirements. Yet, our review disclosed that it had not taken some basic steps to enhance security and reduce costs. In particular, we found that: (1) For their non-scientific computing environments, all seven of the field sites reviewed (two Federal, five contractor) had implemented security configurations that were less stringent than those included in the Federal Desktop Core Configuration. This configuration was designed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology and its use was mandated by the Office of Management and Budget; (2) Although we previously highlighted weaknesses and recommended corrective actions, Science still had not fully established or enforced IT hardware standards for acquiring hardware such as desktop and laptop computers or related peripherals, contributing to significant unnecessary expenditures; and (3) While we have noted in a series of past reports that significant savings could be realized from aggregating demand for IT services and products across the enterprise, Science had not implemented a common infrastructure for users at its Federal sites and continued to maintain an IT environment independent of the Department's Common IT Operating Environment. The weaknesses identified were attributable, at least in part, to a lack of adequate policies and procedures for ensuring effective cyber security and hardware acquisition practices. In addition, Science had not effectively monitored the performance of its field sites to ensure that previously reported internal control weaknesses were addressed and had not implemented an appropriate mechanism to track its IT-related costs. Without improvements, Science may be unable to realize the benefits of improved security over its information systems, reduce costs associated with hardware acquisition, and lower IT support costs through consolidation of services. In particular, we determined that Science could potentially realize savings of more than $3.3 million over the next three years by better controlling hardware costs and implementing standards for certain equipment. Furthermore, Science could continue to pay for duplicative IT support services and fail to take advantage of opportunities to lower costs and apply potential savings to mission-related work. During the course of our audit work, we learned from Science officials that they had initiated the process of revising the Program Cyber Security Plan to better clarif

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

54

Radiological audit of remedial action activities at the processing sites Mexican Hat, Utah and Monument Valley, Arizona. Audit date: May 3--7, 1993, Final report  

SciTech Connect

The Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project`s Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC) performed a radiological audit of the Remedial Action Contractor (RAC), MK-Ferguson and CWM Federal Environmental Services, Inc., at the processing sites in Mexican Hat, Utah, and Monument Valley, Arizona. This audit was conducted May 3--7, 1993, by Bill James and Gerry Simiele of the TAC. Three site-specific findings and four observations were identified during the audit and are presented in this report. The overall conclusion from the audit is that the majority of the radiological aspects of the Mexican Hat, Utah, and Monument Valley, Arizona, remedial action programs are performed adequately. However, the findings identify that there is some inconsistency in following procedures and meeting requirements for contamination control, and a lack of communication between the RAC and the DOE on variances from the published remedial action plan (RAP).

NONE

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

55

Audit Report: IG-0376 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 Audit Report: IG-0376 August 2, 1995 Audit of Program Administration by the Office of Energy Research Audit Report: IG-0376 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0457...

56

Office of Inspector General audit report on vehicle fleet management at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

In a prior report, Audit of Light Vehicle Fleet Management at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, WR-B-93-7, September 29, 1993, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) concluded that vehicle fleet operations might be done more cost effectively by the General Services Administration (GSA) than by Idaho Operations Office (Idaho) and its contractor. The report also concluded that a significant number of vehicles were underused and the fleet was too large. Accordingly, the report contained recommendations that a cost comparison study be conducted to ascertain the most economical and efficient method of managing fleet operations and that vehicle usage data be reviewed periodically by the contractor, with prompt reassignment or disposal of significantly underused vehicles. Thus, the purpose of this audit was to determine if action has been taken to implement recommendations in the prior report. Specifically, the objectives of the current audit were to determine whether a cost comparison had been performed and whether the fleet was still too large. In this report, the authors recommend that Idaho annually review individual vehicle use against mileage standards and promptly dispose of or reassign vehicles not meeting the standards. The authors also recommend that the Idaho Deputy Manager be provided a vehicle assignment report for review and approval.

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

57

Office of Inspector General report on audit of shutdown and transition of the Mound Plant  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

With the end of the Cold War, the Department of Energy (Department) has greatly reduced the production of nuclear weapons and redirected the capabilities and focus of the weapons complex. As part of this redirection, the Mound Plant was transferred from a Defense Program site to an Environmental Management site with emphasis on accelerated cleanup and transition of facilities and personal property to the local community. This audit was initiated to determine if the shutdown and transition of the Mound Plant was progressing effectively and efficiently. The Department prepared a Nonnuclear Consolidation Plan (NCP) designed to reduce its costs of operation by closing and consolidating facilities. In contrast to the goal of the NCP, the Department plans to keep a portion of the Mound Plant open solely to perform work for other Federal agencies. Specifically, the Department has decided to continue assembling and testing isotopic heat sources and radioisotope thermoelectric generators (HS/RTG) at the Mound Plant despite the transfer or planned transfer of all other production operations.The Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology decided to continue its HS/RTG operations at the Mound Plant without adequately considering the overall economic goals of the Department. As a result, the Department may not achieve the savings envisioned by the NCP. Also, the Department may incur between $4 million and $8.5 million more than necessary each year to continue its HS/RTG operations at the Mound Plant. Additionally, if the HS/RTG operations stay at the Mound Plant, the Department will spend more than $3 million to consolidate these operations into one location.

NONE

1997-06-24T23:59:59.000Z

58

Audit of Economic Development Grants and a Cooperative Agreement with East Tennessee Not-For-Profit Organizations, ER-B-97-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AUDIT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANTS AND A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH EAST TENNESSEE NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS Report Number: ER-B-97-01 Eastern Regional Audit Office Date of Issue: October 22, 1996 AUDIT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANTS AND A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH EAST TENNESSEE NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS

59

United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: April 17,2008 Audit Report Number: OAS-L-08-09  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 17,2008 Audit Report Number: OAS-L-08-09 April 17,2008 Audit Report Number: OAS-L-08-09 REPLY TO ATN OF: IG-34 (A07GT038) SUNECT: Report on Survey of "The Department's Controls over Leased Space in the National Capital Area" TO: Director, Office of Management, MA- 1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy (Department) manages a sizeable inventory of real property, including both owned and leased properties. The Office of Management is responsible for the Department's real estate function, which includes acquisition by lease or purchase, inventory, utilization surveys, tracking and disposal of real property assets. In Fiscal Year 2007, the Department had approximately 10 million square feet of leased property at a cost of approximately $168 million. This included approximately 2.3 million square feet in the Washington, D.C.

60

Radiological audit of remedial action activities at the processing site, transfer site, and Cheney disposal site Grand Junction, Colorado: Audit date, August 9--11, 1993. Final report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Uranium Mill Tailing Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project`s Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC) performed a radiological audit of the Remedial Action Contractor (RAC), MK-Ferguson and CWM Federal Environmental Services, Inc., at the processing site, transfer site, and Cheney disposal site in Grand Junction, Colorado. Jim Hylko and Bill James of the TAC conducted this audit August 9 through 11, 1993. Bob Cornish and Frank Bosiljevec represented the US Department of Energy (DOE). This report presents one programmatic finding, eleven site-specific observations, one good practice, and four programmatic observations.

Not Available

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

GAO Audit Reports | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

GAO Audit Reports GAO Audit Reports Budget Budget Home About Budget by Program GAO Audit Reports External Links Contact Information Budget U.S. Department of Energy SC-41/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3541 F: (301) 903-9524 More Information » GAO Audit Reports Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page America COMPETES - GAO-11-127R (October 2010) .pdf file (1012KB) Technology Transfer - GAO-09-548 (June 2009) .pdf file (656KB) Science Project Management - GAO-08-641 (May 2008) .pdf file (912KB) Fusion Energy - GAO-08-30 (October 2007) .pdf file (2.7MB) Climate Change Research Data Sharing - GAO-07-1172 (September 2007) .pdf file (1.3MB) SBIR - GAO-07-38 (October 2006) .pdf file (628KB) Last modified: 3/18/2013 10:59:29 AM

62

FOLLOW-UP AUDIT OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION BY THE OFFICE OF SCIENCE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

guidance to the laboratories after specific projects have been selected. In FY 1999, SC provided 1.7 billion to the laboratories for research projects. FOLLOW-UP AUDIT OF...

63

Audit of Work Force Restructuring at the Fernald Environmental Management Project, ER-B-96-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Inspector General AUDIT OF WORK FORCE RESTRUCTURING AT THE FERNALD ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT Report Number: ER-B-96-01 Eastern Regional Audit Office Date of Issue: April 23, 1996 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 AUDIT OF WORK FORCE RESTRUCTURING AT THE FERNALD ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PART I - APPROACH AND OVERVIEW 3 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Scope and Methodology . . . . . . . . 3

64

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

be performed without further CRM office involvement. Generating and Managing Waste - Industrial waste in the form of general construction debris such as waste concrete, scrap...

65

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Ofice of Audit Services  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspector General Inspector General Ofice of Audit Services Audit Report n - F - 7 7 - -- - - - , 7 . 7 - ) - - The National Nuclear Sec I I . =- a Administration's B61 Spin Rocket I Motor Project ... Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 26, 2006 MEMORANDUh1 FOR T W SECRETARY FROM: regor H. Frie man &- Inspector General SUBJECT INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The National Nuclear Security Administration's B61 Spin Rocket Motor Project" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Sandia National Laboratories are refurbishing the Spin Rocket Motor, a prime component of the B61 nuclear weapon system. Both the originai motor produced in i966 and the version last produced in 1991 are the subjects of the refurbishment. Both motors, which are essentially identical, produce thrust to arm the

66

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Ofice of Audit Services  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspector General Inspector General Ofice of Audit Services Audit Report n - F - 7 7 - -- - - - , 7 . 7 - ) - - The National Nuclear Sec I I . =- a Administration's B61 Spin Rocket I Motor Project ... Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 26, 2006 MEMORANDUh1 FOR T W SECRETARY FROM: regor H. Frie man &- Inspector General SUBJECT INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The National Nuclear Security Administration's B61 Spin Rocket Motor Project" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Sandia National Laboratories are refurbishing the Spin Rocket Motor, a prime component of the B61 nuclear weapon system. Both the originai motor produced in i966 and the version last produced in 1991 are the subjects of the refurbishment. Both motors, which are essentially identical, produce thrust to arm the

67

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of September 30, 1995, WR-FS-96-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE DURING THE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENTmS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995

68

Audit Report: IG-0392 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 Audit Report: IG-0392 July 8, 1996 The Department of Energy Program Offices' Use of Management and Operating Contractor Employees Audit Report: IG-0392 More Documents &...

69

Audit Report: IG-0651 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Audit Report: IG-0651 June 18, 2004 Audit Report on Management of the Department's Personnel Security and Access Control Information Systems For several years, the Office of...

70

Date  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

award of the (Date) ENERGY STAR: Plant name Plant street address Plant city, state, zip code As documented by the attached Statement of Energy Performance, I affirm that the...

71

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades: Modular Office Units SECTION B. Project Description: MFC Infrastructure Upgrades - General The number of researchers and operators at MFC has significantly increased, and is projected to increase further in the future to support the expanding research activities at the facility. These activities will require Infrastructure upgrades (office space, potable water, wastewater treatment, communications, etc.) to accommodate the increasing number of personnel and work shifts. The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) will prepare a separate environmental checklist (EC) and conduct the appropriate level of environmental review for each infrastructure improvement project.

72

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades: Modular Office Units SECTION B. Project Description: MFC Infrastructure Upgrades - General The number of researchers and operators at MFC has significantly increased, and is projected to increase further in the future to support the expanding research activities at the facility. These activities will require Infrastructure upgrades (office space, potable water, wastewater treatment, communications, etc.) to accommodate the increasing number of personnel and work shifts. The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) will prepare a separate environmental checklist (EC) and conduct the appropriate level of environmental review for each infrastructure improvement project.

73

Dates  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dates Dates Nature Bulletin No. 511-A December 15, 1973 Forest Preserve District of Cook County George W. Dunne, President Roland F. Eisenbeis, Supt. of Conservation DATES When the wise men from the east, guided by a mysterious new star, traveled to Jerusalem and thence to Bethlehem where they worshipped the infant Jesus and presented Him with gifts, you can be sure that, in addition to gold and frankincense and myrrh, they carried dates as food to sustain them on their long journey. The Date Palm had been cultivated along the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers since the time of the Sumerians, 3000 years before the birth of Christ. This tree, like the coconut palm, is unknown today in its wild state but is believed to have originated in Ethiopia. In early times it was abundant in Palestine and the scientific name, Phoenix, given to the date palm by the Greeks, may be due to the fact that they first saw it in Phoenicia. The "tree of life, " variously referred to in the Bible, was probably this palm.

74

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Use of Oversight Funds by the Use of Oversight Funds by the State of Nevada and Affected Units of Local Government DOE/IG-0696 July 2005 REPORT ON USE OF OVERSIGHT FUNDS BY THE STATE OF NEVADA AND AFFECTED UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Use of Oversight Funds Details of Finding.......................................................................................1 Recommendations and Comments .............................................................5 Appendices 1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology .....................................................6 2. Prior Audit Reports ...............................................................................8 3. Management Comments........................................................................9

75

Audit Resolution  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Science's Office of Science's Management of Information Technology Resources DOE/IG-0831 November 2009 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 20, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: Audit Report on "The Office of Science's Management of Information Technology Resources" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Office of Science (Science) and its facility contractors are aggressive users of information technology (IT) to support fundamental research in areas such as energy, environmental remediation and computational sciences. Of its $4 billion Fiscal Year 2008 budget, Science spent about $287 million to manage its IT program. This included cyber security activities, acquisition of hardware and software, and support

76

Audit Report: IG-0447 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Audit Report: IG-0447 July 7, 1999 The U.S. Department of Energy's Audit Follow-up Process Audit follow-up is an integral part of good management. According to Office of...

77

Internal Audit Preparation Worksheet  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 Vendor Audit Schedule 07_1211 1 of 3 9 Vendor Audit Schedule 07_1211 1 of 3 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Vendor Audit Schedule Document Number: ADMF-009 Rev. 07_1211 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: ADMP-002 Notify of Changes: MGT ADM Referenced Document(s): N/A ADMF-009 Vendor Audit Schedule 07_1211 2 of 3 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 07_1211 Changed some formatting of form. ADMF-009 Vendor Audit Schedule 07_1211 3 of 3 Vendor Audit Schedule Audit #: Enter Company: Criteria: ISO 9001:2008 Standard Date: Team: Audit Lead: Objective: Scope: 1) Business/Quality System 2) Vendor Process 3) Order Processing Day/Date: Enter Arrive @ Facility

78

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

-RL5- DATE: September 13, 1990 TO: Alexander Williams (w 39 fusrap6 I FROM: Ed Mitchellzm SUBJECT: Elimination Recommendation for American Machine and Foundry in New York City The purpose of this note is to provide the following with respect to the former American Machine and Foundry Company (AMF) in New York City, New York--FUSRAP Considered Site Recommendation (g/13/90). 1 he recommendation is to eliminate the AMF New York City sites. If you agree, then please return an "approved" and dated copy of this note. Upon receipt of it, we will update the Considered-Sites Data Base for FUSRAP of DOE's intent to eliminate the site. Please call me at 353-1281 if you have +ny questions. cc: J. Wagoner D. Tonkay file FUSRAP NY.59 -------------------------------~---------------------------

79

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades - Technical Support Building SECTION B. Project Description: Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades - General The number of researchers and operators at the Materials and Fuels Complex has significantly increased, and is projected to increase further in the future to support the expanding research activities at the facility. These activities will require infrastructure upgrades (office space, potable water, wastewater treatment, communications, etc.) to accommodate the increasing number of personnel and work shifts. The INL will prepare a separate environmental checklist (EC) and conduct the appropriate level of environmental review for each

80

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security Over Wireless Networking Security Over Wireless Networking Technologies DOE/IG-0617 August 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 25, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THQ SECIjETARY FROM: Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Security Over Wireless Networking Technologies" BACKGROUND An increasing number of the Department of Energy's organizations are using wireless communications devices and networks. Such technologies enable the transmission of data without physical connection using radio frequency. Wireless technologies range from such complex systems as wireless local area networks, cell phones, and personal digital assistants to relatively simple devices that do not process or store information, such as wireless headphones, and microphones.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Date  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2009 3, 2009 Tim Meeks, Administrator Western Area Power Administration P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, CO 80228-8213 Dear Administrator Meeks: East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (East River) offers this letter as comment to the Western Area Power Administration's (Western) Federal Register Notice (FRN), (dated March 4, 2009, pp.9392-9393) concerning implementation of Western's new transmission loan or construction authority. East River is a wholesale electric power supply cooperative which provides twenty rural electric cooperatives and one municipal electric system transmission and power supply services. These twenty-one non-profit retail electric providers, which collectively own East River, serve about 90,000 residential, commercial

82

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 SECTION A. Project Title: TRA-653 HVAC Modifications SECTION B. Project Description: The proposed project plans to replace the existing blowers, swamp coolers and electric heaters in the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Test Reactor Area-653 (TRA-653) office area with three roof mounted heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) units; and install six roof mounted HVAC units at the TRA-653 machine shop area. These modifications are needed to enhance workplace habitability, maintain a more consistent building environment, and achieve a more energy efficient system. The TRA- 653 machine shop currently uses portable swamp coolers to cool their shop. TRA-653 is eligible for the National Historic Register, however, the activity as described is exempt from cultural resource review (INL Cultural Resource Management Plan;

83

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 SECTION A. Project Title: TRA-653 HVAC Modifications SECTION B. Project Description: The proposed project plans to replace the existing blowers, swamp coolers and electric heaters in the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Test Reactor Area-653 (TRA-653) office area with three roof mounted heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) units; and install six roof mounted HVAC units at the TRA-653 machine shop area. These modifications are needed to enhance workplace habitability, maintain a more consistent building environment, and achieve a more energy efficient system. The TRA- 653 machine shop currently uses portable swamp coolers to cool their shop. TRA-653 is eligible for the National Historic Register, however, the activity as described is exempt from cultural resource review (INL Cultural Resource Management Plan;

84

Audits & Inspections | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Audits & Inspections Audits & Inspections Audits & Inspections Audits & Inspections The Office of Audits and Inspections provides all internal and contracted audit activities, inspections, and reviews for Department programs and operations, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The Office also performs all OIG intelligence oversight and reporting as required by Executive Order and statue. The Office works as an agent for positive change and continuous improvement in the Department's management and program operations; and strives to provide reliable, credible financial and performance information to senior Department management, the Congress and taxpayers. The Office of Audits and Inspections consists of a Headquarters

85

Audit Resolution  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department's WinSAGA System for Department's WinSAGA System for Energy Grants Management Under the Recovery Act OAS-RA-10-05 March 2010 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 March 25, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY, ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Management Controls over the Department's WinSAGA System for Energy Grants Management Under the Recovery Act" BACKGROUND As a result of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), the Department of Energy (Department) received $8.1 billion for formula grant programs supporting

86

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 SECTION A. Project Title: Smoking Shelters SECTION B. Project Description. Install up to three prefabricated outdoor shelters for smokers. Design and install a shelter base so that shelters can be movable. The base shall be designed to prevent shelters from moving or tipping over due to high winds. Specific location for shelters is to be determined, but the shelter bases will be placed atop existing concrete or asphalt such that no subsurface soil disturbance is expected. SECTION C. Environmental Aspects / Potential Sources of Impact none SECTION D. Determine the Level of Environmental Review (or Documentation) and Reference(s): Identify the applicable categorical exclusion from 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B, give the appropriate justification, and the approval date..

87

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 SECTION A. Project Title: Smoking Shelters SECTION B. Project Description. Install up to three prefabricated outdoor shelters for smokers. Design and install a shelter base so that shelters can be movable. The base shall be designed to prevent shelters from moving or tipping over due to high winds. Specific location for shelters is to be determined, but the shelter bases will be placed atop existing concrete or asphalt such that no subsurface soil disturbance is expected. SECTION C. Environmental Aspects / Potential Sources of Impact none SECTION D. Determine the Level of Environmental Review (or Documentation) and Reference(s): Identify the applicable categorical exclusion from 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B, give the appropriate justification, and the approval date..

88

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy's Spent Department of Energy's Spent Nuclear Fuel Canisters and Transportation Casks DOE/IG-0608 June 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 20, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE, SECRETARY FROM: Greg +2 y 2- nedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Spent Nuclear Fuel Canisters and Transportation Casks" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy manages about 2,500 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel generated from research and development, plutonium production, and the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (Naval Reactors). Under current national policy, the Department is to permanently dispose of its spent fuel in an underground repository, but an appropriate repository is not expected to be available until at least 201 0. Until then, the Department

89

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Reduction Plans for the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory DOE/IG-0611 July 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 7, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE$ECRETARY e - FROM: 'Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Waste Reduction Plans for the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory" BACKGROUND Since the early 1970s, the Department of Energy has stored about 65,000 cubic meters of transuranic (TRU) waste and mixed low-level waste at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), near Idaho Falls, Idaho. Most of the waste was generated at the Rocky Flats Plant near Denver, Colorado, and was shipped to the INEEL

90

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Rocky Flats the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site's Low-Level Mixed Waste DOE/IG-0612 July 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 8, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETWY FROM: Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Disposal of the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site's Low-Level Mixed Waste" BACKGROUND In February 2000, the Department of Energy entered into a contract with Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC to close the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site by December 15,2006. Under the terms of the contract, Kaiser-Hill is responsible for treating and packaging low-level mixed waste (LLMW) greater than 10 nanocuries per gram, and the Department is responsible for providing a disposal site for the waste. Kaiser-Hill has

91

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reconfiguration of the Kansas City Reconfiguration of the Kansas City Plant DOE/IG-0616 August 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 13, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR T ~ E C R E T A R Y FROM: & * regor H. ne man Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on the " Reconfiguration of the Kansas City Plant'' BACKGROUND In 1994, the Department of Energy announced its intention to study options for consolidating production operations throughout the complex. In response, the contractor at the Kansas City Plant submitted a plan to significantly reduce the size of its operations. In March 1997, the Department approved Kansas City's Stockpile Management Restructuring Initiative (SMRI), currently estimated to cost $138 million. The Department's approval was based on projected operational savings of $35.4 million per

92

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Remote-Handled Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE/IG-0613 July 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 18, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY / ' - FROM: I /+.- Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Disposal of Remote- Handled Transuranic Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant" BACKGROUND The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), located near Carlsbad, New Mexico, is the Department of Energy's underground repository for defense-generated Transuranic (TRU) waste. TRU waste consists of items such as clothing, gloves, and tools contaminated with small amounts of radioactive elements. Most TRU wastes can be handled by workers using minimal specialized protective gear and is referred to as

93

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Funds Provided to Local Oversight Funds Provided to Local Governments in the State of Nevada DOE/IG-0600 May 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 May 23, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR T FROM: & S Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Oversight Funds Provided to Local Governments in the State of Nevada" BACKGROUND Under the terms of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, the State of Nevada and affected local governments are entitled to exercise oversight of the Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain Project. Oversight funds provided by the Department may be used to review Yucca Mountain activities with the potential to affect local economies, public health and safety, and the environment. In Fiscal Years 2001 and 2002, ten local governments received

94

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sensitive Equipment Sensitive Equipment at Selected Locations DOE/IG-0606 June 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 16, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman &??ikA-J-+ Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Management of Sensitive Equipment at Selected Locations" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy and its facilities' management contractors have come under increased scrutiny regarding the management of sensitive personal property. The Department defined sensitive property as equipment susceptible to misappropriation for personal use or readily convertible to cash. Generally, this includes equipment such as computers, personal digital assistants, cameras, and communications equipment. The Department has made a significant investment in sensitive property. For example, our

95

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration's National Nuclear Security Administration's Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Evaluation Process DOE/IG-0614 August 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 5 , 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregor . Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on the "National Nuclear Security Administration's Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Evaluation Process" BACKGROUND The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) was established in March 2000 as a semi-autonomous agency within the Department of Energy. At NNSA's inception, management committed to implementing a Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Evaluation (PPBE) process, modeled on the system used by the Department of Defense. A PPBE process uses short-term and long-term planning to define program requirements

96

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Site's Waste Savannah River Site's Waste Solidification Building DOE/IG-IG-0618 September 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 4, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR FROM: Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Savannah River Site's Waste Solidification Building" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) plans to spend about $58 million to design and construct a facility at the Savannah River Site which will treat radioactive liquid wastes. The proposed facility, commonly referred to as the Waste Solidification Building (WSB), will produce several waste forms acceptable for disposal at existing sites around the complex. This effort is a part of the Department's Plutonium Disposition Program. NNSA approved the conceptual design for the WSB in

97

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Protective Forces DOE/IG-0602 June 2003 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 J u n e 3 , 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE, SECRETARY FROM: +&k Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Management of the Department's Protective Forces'' BACKGROUND The Department of Energy and its contractors are responsible for protecting materials and facilities critical to the Nation's nuclear defense program, as well as those used to support scientific, research, and environmental-related missions. While the security of Department sites has been a priority for many years, in the wake of the terrorist attacks of September 11,2001, the Department took action to enhance security at its facilities. One

98

Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Administration's B61 Spin Rocket Motor Project DOE/IG-0740 September 2006 Department of Energy Washington, DC 2 0 5 8 5 September 26, 2006 MEMORANDURI FOR FROM: 1nspictor General SUBJECT INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The National Nuclear Security Administration's B61 Spin Rocket Motor Project" BACKGROUND The Department cf Energy's Sandia National Laboratories are refurbishing the Spin Rocket Motor, a 1:rime component of the B61 nuclear weapon system. Both the originai motor produced i2 i906 and the version last produced in 1991 are the subjects of the refurbishment. Rvth motors, which are essentially identical, produce thrust to arm thz weapon. In Deceinber 2001, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) received Nuclear Weapons Council Standing and Safety Committee (NWCSSC) approval

99

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

OOE F 1325.3 OOE F 1325.3 m e m o randum DATE: SEP 23 1988 Department of Energy IL_. 9 REPLY TO AlTN OF, NE-23 SUElJECT. Owner Searches for Potential Sites in Chicago IL, (7 TO: W . Cottrell, ORNL 0. Kozlouski, OTS W h ile in Chicago, Illinois, on September 13, 14, and 15, 1988, I drove to the suspected addresses of several potential FUSRAP sites. No owners were contacted during this activity because most of the work was done after normal working hours or while on the way to the airport when tim e would not permit the visit. I .?I ' - Former C-B Tool Products Co. 956 E. 58th Street Chicago, Illinois The University of Chicago Ingleside Hall is located at this address. It is the University O ffice of Employment and contains a U.S. Post O ffice. The structure is several stories and looks like it may have existed in the

100

Audit Report: WR-FS-97-04 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Operations Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996 Financial Statements Audit Report: WR-FS-97-04 More Documents & Publications Audit Report:...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Audit Report: OAS-L-07-10  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Audit of the Department of Energy's Community and Regulatory Support Funding at the Carlsbad Field Office

102

Office of Inspector General audit report on the U.S. Department of Energy`s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 1998  

SciTech Connect

The Department prepared the Fiscal Year 1998 Accountability Report to combine critical financial and program performance information in a single report. The Department`s consolidated financial statements and the related audit reports are included as major components of the Accountability Report. The Office of Inspector General audited the Department`s consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended September 30, 1998 and 1997. In the opinion of the Office of Inspector General, except for the environmental liabilities lines items in Fiscal year 1998, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Department as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and its consolidated net cost, changes in net position, budgetary resources, financing activities, and custodial activities for the years then ended in conformity with Federal accounting standards. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, the Office of Inspector General issued a separate report on the Department internal controls. This report discusses needed improvements to the environmental liabilities estimating process and the reporting of performance measure information.

NONE

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Part I, General Audit Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and subrecipients of and subrecipients of federal financial assistance from the Department of Energy (DOE). Such compliance audits must be conducted in accordance with the requirements and guidance set forth in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 117, Compliance Audits (SAS 117) and generally accepted government auditing standards (GAGAS). See section C below for more detail. The audit procedures provided in this Audit Program are the minimum necessary for uniform and consistent audit coverage. Auditors conducting audits of entities subject to the requirements of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations, should not use this Audit Program and should instead refer to the Circular and the

104

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Science's Energy Frontier Office of Science's Energy Frontier Research Centers OAS-RA-L-10-09 August 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: August 27, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-10-09 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-32 (A10RA003) SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Office of Science's Energy Frontier Research Centers" TO: Associate Director, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, SC-22 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE In 2008, the Department of Energy's (Department) Office of Science (Science) issued a Funding Opportunity Announcement seeking applications from the scientific community for the establishment of Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs). The purpose of the EFRCs is to integrate the talent and expertise of leading scientists to accelerate the rate of

105

Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project Black-Cell and Hard-to-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review of the Independent Oversight Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Black-Cell and Hard-To-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 2

106

Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project Black-Cell and Hard-to-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review of the Independent Oversight Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Black-Cell and Hard-To-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 2

107

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General report on audit of the Department of Energy`s Site Safeguards and Security Plans  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (Department) is required to protect its nuclear facilities from unauthorized access and theft, diversion, or destruction of special nuclear materials such as plutonium and uranium-235. The steps taken by the field sites to meet these requirements are outlined in a document entitled the ``Site Safeguards and Security Plan`` (SSSP). The authors initiated the audit at the request of the Office of Nonproliferation and National Security to evaluate the progress made in the SSSP process. The audit was performed to determine whether SSSP guidance was used as policy to evaluate and approve the site plans and whether new security requirements established by the guidance were justified. Of the five locations visited, three had identified facilities that would be pushed above the Office of Safeguards and Security`s acceptable level of low risk when new security (consequence) values were incorporated. Each of the sites will need to devise and install additional compensatory measures because of the increase in consequence values. The authors recommended that the Office of Nonproliferation and National Security discontinue using guidance as policy for evaluation, approval, and concurrence of Site Safeguards and Security Plans until they had been formally coordinated and concurred on by program and field elements. They also recommended that all proposed policy changes and guidance, when used as policy, be coordinated with affected program and field offices through the Department`s Directives System.

NONE

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-12 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-12 July 23, 2009 Agreed-Upon Procedures for Federal Payroll The Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 07-04 (Bulletin), "Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements," dated September 4, 2007, amended august 25, 2008, requires an annual audit of civilian payroll of executive departments and other Government agencies. Auditors are required to follow the agreed-upon procedures in Section 11 of the Bulletin to assess the reasonableness of life insurance, health benefits, and retirement with holdings and contributions. Topic: Management and Administration Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-12 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: OAS-L-08-16 Agreed-lJpon Procedures for Federal Payroll, OAS-L-08-16 Audit Report: OAS-L-07-14

109

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2009 9, 2009 CX-000177: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ohio County Franklin CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 11/09/2009 Location(s): Franklin County, Ohio Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 9, 2009 CX-000280: Categorical Exclusion Determination Smoking Shelters CX(s) Applied: B1.5 Date: 11/09/2009 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Idaho Operations Office, Nuclear Energy November 9, 2009 CX-000047: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tempe's Consultants and Studies, Revolving Loan Program, Lighting/Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning/Streetlight Retrofits, Audits, and Solar Photovoltaic CX(s) Applied: B5.1, B1.32, B2.5, A9, A11 Date: 11/09/2009 Location(s): Tempe, Arizona Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

110

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

17, 2011 17, 2011 CX-005428: Categorical Exclusion Determination Improved Structure and Fabrication of Large High-Power Kinetic Hydropower System Rotors -Year 2 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1, B5.1 Date: 03/17/2011 Location(s): New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 17, 2011 CX-005407: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program -Farm Audit Implementation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/17/2011 Location(s): Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 17, 2011 CX-005398: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - Illinois-City-Schaumburg, Village of CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 03/17/2011 Location(s): Schaumburg, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

111

Audit Memo Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 1, 2013 May 1, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ACTING SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: External Peer Review Report on the Office of Audits The Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, prescribe that all audit organizations must have an external peer review performed by an independent organization once every 3years. Earlier this year, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) conducted the required peer review of my Office of Audits. It is our responsibility, under the Government Auditing Standards, to circulate the results of the peer review to the responsible agency head and to the members of Congress. Attached for your information is a copy of the recently completed peer review. I am pleased to

112

Audit Report: OAS-L-03-13 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Audit Report: OAS-L-03-13 April 22, 2003 Audit of Performance Measures in the Office of Science The purpose of this report is to inform you of the results of our audit of Office...

113

Audit Report: IG-0418 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Audit Report: IG-0418 March 13, 1998 Audit of Alternatives to Testing at the Tonopah Test Range The Office of Inspector General has issued several recent reports concerning ways...

114

Review Dates (updated October 2013) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Review Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Construction Photos Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Project Location Date National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II) Mini Review GTN 12/4/13 12 GeV Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) Upgrade Mini Review GTN 12/9/13 National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II) BNL 1/29-30/14

115

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2047: Categorical Exclusion Determination 2047: Categorical Exclusion Determination Irma Charing Cross Sidewalk Project American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/20/2010 Location(s): Irmo, South Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 20, 2010 CX-001899: Categorical Exclusion Determination XLD Reject Reclamation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/20/2010 Location(s): Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 20, 2010 CX-001855: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant City of St. Petersburg - Commercial Energy Efficiency Audit Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/20/2010 Location(s): St. Petersburg, Florida

116

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2009 4, 2009 CX-006676: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Technologies Program CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B5.1, B5.2 Date: 12/14/2009 Location(s): Casper, Wyoming Office(s): RMOTC December 14, 2009 CX-000127: Categorical Exclusion Determination United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians Energy Efficiency and Conservation Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1, A9 Date: 12/14/2009 Location(s): Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy December 14, 2009 CX-000126: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians Community Center Energy Efficiency Audit CX(s) Applied: B5.1, A9, A11 Date: 12/14/2009 Location(s): California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy December 11, 2009 CX-000817: Categorical Exclusion Determination Closure of Septic Tanks 607-12G, -31G and -32G

117

Interim Transmittal Letter dated July 27 2005 | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Interim Transmittal Letter dated July 27 2005 Interim Transmittal Letter dated July 27 2005 High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP) HEPAP Home Meetings Members .pdf file (20KB) Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (44KB) HEP Committees of Visitors HEP Home Charges/Reports Interim Transmittal Letter dated July 27 2005 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page July 27, 2005 Harold T. Shapiro, Chair Sally Dawson, Vice Chair Elementary Particle Physics 2010 Committee The National Academies 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20001 Dear Harold and Sally, Thank you again for your letter of March 15, 2005 to me as Chair of the High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP) and for the opportunity to answer your questions about the International Linear Collider (ILC) along the broad themes of 1) the physics case, 2) the research and development

118

Audit Report: Department of Energy's Controls over Recovery Act Spending at the Idaho National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audits and Inspections Audits and Inspections Audit Report Department of Energy's Controls over Recovery Act Spending at the Idaho National Laboratory OAS-RA-L-11-10 July 2011 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: July 21, 2011 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-10 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-35 (A10RA038) SUBJECT: Report on "Department of Energy's Controls over Recovery Act Spending at the Idaho National Laboratory" TO: Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Environmental Management, EM-1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy's (Department) Office of Environmental Management (EM) oversees two major contracts for cleaning up the legacy contamination at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The 7 year, $2.9 billion contract with CH2M♦WG Idaho, LLC

119

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

. . POLICY FLASH 2010-616 July 8,201 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Single Audit Act Initiatives by the Office of Risk Management, Office of the Chief Financial Officer Activities SUMMARY: This Flash forwards a memorandum from the Chief Financial Officer on new initiatives relating to the Single Audit Act and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-1 33. The Office of Risk Management will provide services to assist DOE'S acquisition and financial assistance personnel in the review and use of audits performed under the Act and Circular. This Policy Flash will be available online at the following website: http:l/mananement.ener~.~ov/_~olic~ miidancel~olic~ flashes.htm.

120

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Services Audit Services Management Controls over the Use of Service Contracts at the Office of River Protection OAS-M-09-02 April 2009 Audit Report Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 29, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION FROM: George W. Collard Assistant Inspector General for Performance Audits Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Management Controls over the Use of Service Contracts at the Office of River Protection" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's (Department) Office of River Protection (ORP) is responsible for the storage, treatment, and disposal of over 53 million gallons of highly

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Audit Report: OAS-L-08-15  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE: August 7,2008 Audit Report No. OAS-L-08-15 DATE: August 7,2008 Audit Report No. OAS-L-08-15 REPLY TO ATTN OF- IG-34 (A08ID013) SUBJECT Report on "Resolution of Personal Safety Issues at the Department of Energy" TO: . Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer INTRODUCTION AND 0B.TECTIVE The Department of Energy's (Department) Corrective Action Management Program (CAMP) is a systematic process for developing, tracking, reporting, and implementing corrective actions to resolve safety findings. It is also used to determine the effectiveness of completed corrective actions in preventing the recurrence of safety issues. The Department's Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) oversees CAMP and performs safety program assessments at each major Department site every one to three years to

122

Audit Report: IG-0826 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IG-0826 Audit Report: IG-0826 September 30, 2009 Cooperative Research and Development Agreements at the Department of Energy's Office of Science Laboratories Technology transfer,...

123

Audit Report: IG-526 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sciences Laboratory In response to a 1995 Office of Inspector General report entitled, Audit of Department of Energy's Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL),...

124

Audit Report: IG-0676 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Audit Report: IG-0676 February 14, 2005 Department of Energy Contractor Home Office Expenses Our review of five contracts for national laboratories and disclosed that the...

125

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2010 5, 2010 CX-000919: Categorical Exclusion Determination Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/25/2010 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 25, 2010 CX-000917: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ocean Thermal Energy Converter Life Cycle Cost Analysis Date: 02/25/2010 Location(s): Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 25, 2010 CX-000916: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ocean Thermal Extractable Energy Visualization CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 02/25/2010 Location(s): Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 25, 2010 CX-000862: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mount Laurel Energy Audit Implementation Project

126

FEBRUARY 21, 2013 AUDIT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEBRUARY 21, 2013 AUDIT REPORT REPORT NO. IG-13-009 (ASSIGNMENT NO. A-12-014-00) OFFICE OF AUDITS Unallocated Future Expenses #12;FEBRUARY 21, 2013 REPORT NO. IG-13-009 OVERVIEW MARS ATMOSPHERE AND VOLATILE and In Tracking Their Performance," May 4, 2008. #12;FEBRUARY 21, 2013 REPORT NO. IG-13-009 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION

127

Audit report: ER-FS-99-02 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Operations Office During the Audit Of The Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1998 Financial Statements The Government Management Reform Act of 1994 requires that audited...

128

Summary Audit Report on Contractor Employee Relocation and Temporary Living Costs, IG-0400  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE: January 27, 1997 DATE: January 27, 1997 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-1 SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Summary Audit Report on Contractor Employee Relocation andTemporary Living Costs TO: The Acting Secretary This summary report highlights systemic problems with contractor charges for contractor employee relocation and temporary living costs. Over the past 5 years, the Office of Inspector General issued nine audit reports that identified unreasonable and unallowable charges for employee relocation and temporary living costs by contractors and their subcontractors. We found that contractors were reimbursed for these costs because the Department of Energy (Department) did not use clearly defined contract provisions

129

Audit Report: IG-0473 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

473 473 Audit Report: IG-0473 May 31, 2000 Campaigning Activities by Political Appointees In a letter to the Office of Inspector General dated February 29, 2000, the Chairman, Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, requested information concerning the political activities conducted by Departmental employees. The Committee also made similar requests to other Executive Branch Inspectors General. We performed an audit to determine whether campaigning activities by Departmental employees in politically sensitive positions were in accordance with applicable laws and policies and were not interfering with their official duties. We examined 90 trips taken during the 2-year period from March 1, 1998, through March 1, 2000, including trips in which you participated. We also reviewed trips taken by Deputy

130

Audit Report: IG-0473 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IG-0473 IG-0473 Audit Report: IG-0473 May 31, 2000 Campaigning Activities by Political Appointees In a letter to the Office of Inspector General dated February 29, 2000, the Chairman, Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, requested information concerning the political activities conducted by Departmental employees. The Committee also made similar requests to other Executive Branch Inspectors General. We performed an audit to determine whether campaigning activities by Departmental employees in politically sensitive positions were in accordance with applicable laws and policies and were not interfering with their official duties. We examined 90 trips taken during the 2-year period from March 1, 1998, through March 1, 2000, including trips in which you participated. We also reviewed trips taken by Deputy

131

Office of Inspector General audit report on the U.S. Department of Energy`s management of Associated Western Universities grant programs  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE), recognizing the need to maintain a strong science and engineering base at a time when enrollments in these disciplines were declining, implemented several educational programs. Among these were educational programs to provide faculty and students of US colleges and universities with energy-related training and research experience. Associated Western Universities (AWU), a nonprofit organization, administered post-secondary educational programs for DOE through grants and, occasionally, subcontracts. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether: (1) DOE was achieving its goal of enhancing US science and engineering education and (2) AWU was appropriately accumulating and classifying its costs. It was found that DOE was not fully achieving its objective of enhancing science and engineering education for students of US colleges and universities. In addition, it was found that AWU had not complied with cost principles for nonprofit organizations as required under the terms of the grants. Specifically, AWU misclassified a $13,000 overrun of direct program cost as indirect cost, incurred $40,000 of idle facility costs that were unallowable under the terms of the grant, misclassified indirect costs as direct costs, and claimed reimbursement for consultant costs that were inappropriate under the terms of the consulting contract. These discrepancies resulted in $53,000 of questionable costs, as well as costs having been charged to the Office of Energy Research (ER) grant that should have been charged to the Richland and Idaho grants. The authors recommended that the Managers of the Richland and Idaho Operations offices take actions to ensure that the objectives of DOE`s educational programs are met. In addition, they recommended that the Manager, Idaho Operations Office, direct the Contracting Officer to have AWU comply with the appropriate cost principles for nonprofit organizations.

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

Development and Application of Expert Systems in Audit Services  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The authors evaluate research and development in the design of expert systems for the audit domain, providing an overview of the domain of expert judgment involved in the audit process. A framework used to present and analyze work to date and to guide ... Keywords: audit complexity, audit domain, audit process, auditing, expert judgment, expert system validation, expert systems, future efforts, knowledge acquisition, knowledge representation, representational forms, rule-based systems

E. L. Denna; J. V. Hansen; R. D. Meservy

1991-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

Audit Report: OAS-L-07-19 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

19 Audit Report: OAS-L-07-19 August 13, 2007 Executive Compensation at Selected Office of Science Sites Audit Report: OAS-L-07-19 More Documents & Publications Audit Report:...

134

THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S AUDIT FOLLOW-UP PROCESS, IG-0447...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AUDIT FOLLOW-UP PROCESS, IG-0447 THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S AUDIT FOLLOW-UP PROCESS, IG-0447 Audit follow-up is an integral part of good management. According to Office of...

135

Audit Report: OAS-L-03-14 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report: OAS-L-03-14 Audit Report: OAS-L-03-14 April 17, 2003 Audit of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's (EE) Grants, Subsidies, and Cost Sharing...

136

Audit of the Management of the Department of Energy's Leased Administrative Facilities, IG-0402  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorandum Memorandum DATE: April 1, 1997 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-1 SUBJECT: INFORMATION: "Audit of the Management of the Department of Energy's Leased Administrative Facilities" TO: The Secretary BACKGROUND: The Department is accountable for a large inventory of real property made up of owned, leased, and government-controlled property. The Office of Human Resources and Administration and the Office of Field Management are responsible for the Department's real property leasing program. These two offices, in conjunction with the Operations Offices in the field, procure space or authorize the procurement of space by contractors. Departmental records from Fiscal Year 1996 showed

137

Audit Report: CR-B-98-01 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 Audit Report: CR-B-98-01 October 8, 1997 Audit of the Internal Control Structure of the Department of Energy's Working Capital Fund The Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development of the Committee on Appropriations, in its report dated July 16, 1996, approved the implementation of a Working Capital Fund (Fund) at the U.S. Department of Energy. The Subcommittee also directed the Office of Inspector General to conduct periodic audits of the Fund. This audit was conducted to determine if the Department established an effective system of controls over the Fund. Our specific objectives were to determine if internal controls were sufficient to ensure that appropriate costs were allocated in a reasonable and unbiased manner and in a way that was consistent with the expectations

138

Audit Report: CR-B-98-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Audit Report: CR-B-98-01 October 8, 1997 Audit of the Internal Control Structure of the Department of Energy's Working Capital Fund The Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development of the Committee on Appropriations, in its report dated July 16, 1996, approved the implementation of a Working Capital Fund (Fund) at the U.S. Department of Energy. The Subcommittee also directed the Office of Inspector General to conduct periodic audits of the Fund. This audit was conducted to determine if the Department established an effective system of controls over the Fund. Our specific objectives were to determine if internal controls were sufficient to ensure that appropriate costs were allocated in a reasonable and unbiased manner and in a way that was consistent with the expectations

139

Office of Inspector General audit report on waste treatment plans at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

The Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (Laboratory) stores nearly 65,000 cubic meters of waste generated on site or brought to the State of Idaho (Idaho) from Department of Energy (DOE) sites across the country since 1970. This represents approximately 62 percent of the stored waste that DOE plans to ship and permanently dispose of at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in Carlsbad, New Mexico. In December 1996, DOE met the first milestone by awarding a fixed-price contract to a private company to construct and operate the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility (Treatment Facility) -- nearly 6 months ahead of schedule. Because the Treatment Facility would not be available to meet the 3,100 cubic meter milestone by December 31, 2002, DOE decided to dispose of untreated waste using the characterization process that was in place in 1989, and adapting it to meet new characterization requirements. The purpose of the audit was to determine whether it is in the best interest of the Government to defer processing the 3,100 cubic meters of waste until the new Treatment Facility can do so. The analysis showed that waiting until the Treatment Facility can process the 3,100 cubic meters of waste would be more economic and reduce the environmental risks to Laboratory employees. Therefore, a compromise between DOE and Idaho officials allowing such a deferral would be in the best interest of the Government.

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-06  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorandum Memorandum DATE. March 6, 2009 De~artment of Enerav Audit Report Number: OAS-L-09-06 REPLY TO A T ~ N OF IG-30 (A08FN005) SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Federal R4anagers1 Financial Integrity P.ctf' TO: Chief Financial Officer, CF- I 'The Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA) of 1982 requires agency heads to provide an annual assurance statement on whether internal control and financial systems provide reasonable assurance that the integrity of Federal programs and operations is protected. [n response. the Department of Energy (Department) developed a program for evaluating the adequacy of its internal controls and determining whether they conform to the principles and standards established by the Office of Management and Budget and the Government

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

LoanSTAR Monitoring and Analysis Program Building Energy Monitoring Workbook Submitted to the Texas Governors Energy Office by the Improved Energy Audit Process Task (Aug. 1992)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This building energy monitoring workbook has been prepared for the Texas Governor's Energy Office by the Improved Energy Audit Task of the LoanSTAR Monitoring and Analysis Program. This workbook is intended to be a stand-alone survival guide to acquiring energy use and environmental data in buildings. It includes monitoring procedures and data analysis routines developed for the Texas LoanSTAR program and is copyrighted for distribution in the public domain.

Haberl, J. S.; Lopez, R.; Sparks, R. J.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

Audit of Electrical System Construction Projects at the Nevada Operations Office, WR-B-97-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AT THE NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost-effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov Department of Energy Headquarters Anonymous FTP vm1.hqadmin.doe.gov Department of Energy Human Resources and Administration Home Page http://www.hr.doe.gov/refshelf.html Your comments would be appreciated and can be provided on the Customer Response form attached to the report. This report can be obtained from the U.S. Department of Energy

143

AUDIT REPORT REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE IDAHO OPERATIONS...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE IDAHO OPERATIONS OFFICE DURING THE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENT'S CONSOLIDATED FISCAL YEAR 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, WR-FS-99-01 AUDIT REPORT REPORT...

144

Audit Report on "Security Overtime at the Oak Ridge Operations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home Audit Report on "Security Overtime at the Oak Ridge Operations Office", ER-B-00-02 Audit Report on "Security Overtime at the Oak...

145

Audit of Work Force Restructuring at the Oak Ridge Operations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home Audit of Work Force Restructuring at the Oak Ridge Operations Office, ER-B-95-06 Audit of Work Force Restructuring at the Oak Ridge...

146

Reimbursable Agreements Coordination Office  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... In response to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit in 2010, NIST was required to make significant changes in the way we accept ...

2013-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

147

Audit Report on Management Controls over the Use of Service Contracts at the Office of River Protection  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy's (Department) Office of River Protection (ORP) is responsible for the storage, treatment, and disposal of over 53 million gallons of highly radioactive waste from over 40 years of plutonium production at the Hanford Site. Because of the diversity, complexity, and large scope of its mission, coupled with its small staff, ORP told us that it has found it necessary to engage in service contracts to obtain consulting services, technical expertise, and support staff. Federal policy generally permits contractors to perform a wide range of support service activities, including, in most situations, the drafting of Government documents subject to the review and approval of Federal employees. Federal policy issued by the Office of Management and Budget, however, prohibits contractors from drafting agency responses to Congressional inquiries and reports issued by the Office of Inspector General and Government Accountability Office (GAO) because they are so closely related to the public interest and provide the appearance of private influence. To provide a majority of its needed services, ORP issued a Blanket Purchase Agreement to Project Assistance Corporation (PAC) in 2003. Through the Blanket Purchase Agreement, ORP acquired services in the areas of project management, risk assessment, program assessment, quality assurance, safety, cost and schedule estimating, budgeting and finance, and engineering. PAC has, in turn, subcontracted with various other firms to obtain some of the services needed by ORP. From 2005 to 2008, the total annual cost for the contract with PAC had grown from $4.7 million to $9.2 million. Because of the extent of the services provided and growing costs of the contract, we conducted this review to determine whether ORP appropriately administered its contract with the Project Assistance Corporation. Our review disclosed that, in some instances, ORP had not appropriately administered all work performed under the PAC contract. Specifically, ORP allowed PAC employees to perform work that was inherently governmental and created situations where a potential conflict of interest occurred. Specifically: (1) ORP assigned PAC employees responsibility for providing information and responses to Congressional inquiries and reports issued by the GAO and the Department of Energy's Office of Inspector General (OIG); and (2) PAC employees were also allowed to perform functions that created potential conflicts of interest. ORP permitted PAC employees, for example, to develop statements of work and approve funding of work to be performed under PAC's own contract. We concluded that these problems occurred, at least in part, because ORP had not established controls necessary to effectively administer the PAC contract. Federal procurement regulations recommended that agencies provide additional management controls over contractors whose work has the potential to influence the action of government officials. ORP, however, had not implemented the controls specifically recommended in Federal policy guidance for administering contracts, including: (1) Performing conflict of interest reviews; and (2) Separating contractor and Department employees either physically or organizationally. By not effectively administering its contract with PAC, ORP increased the risk that decisions based on work performed by the contractor may not have been made in the best interests of the Department. For example, ORP increased the risk that approved work would be unnecessary or too costly. As we also recently noted in our report on 'Management Challenges at the Department of Energy' (DOE/IG-0808, December 2008), contract administration issues such as those discussed in this report remain a significant vulnerability. Continued efforts to improve this area are vitally important since the risk that contractors receive payments for unallowable costs could also increase as the Department expands its contracting activities under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. To its credit, however, ORP has recognized that there are weakn

None

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

Audit Report: IG-0474 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Audit Report: IG-0474 June 27, 2000 Experimental Breeder Reactor II Termination Activities In February 1994, Congress directed that the Department of Energy immediately terminate its Advanced Liquid Metal Reactor Program (Reactor Program) and close the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR II). The Reactor Program was a scientific effort to test and develop advanced nuclear reactor technology using EBR II. The Reactor Program and EBR II are located at the Argonne National Laboratory-West site in Idaho. The Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology (Nuclear Energy), is the Headquarters program office responsible for this effort. To date, the Department has provided about $444 million for termination activities, of which about $55 million has been spent specifically on EBR II closure. The

149

Audit Report: IG-0881 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report: IG-0881 Audit Report: IG-0881 Audit Report: IG-0881 February 19, 2013 National Nuclear Security Administration Contractor Governance Since July 2007, the Department of Energy (Department) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) have required contractors to implement self-assessment systems to measure performance and help ensure effective and efficient mission accomplishment. In essence, contractors assessed and evaluated their own performance with some level of Federal oversight. Our audit found that despite at least 5 years of effort, NNSA and its support offices and site contractors had not yet implemented fully functional and effective contractor assurance systems. During recent Office of Inspector General (OIG) reviews, we identified significant

150

Audit of the internal control structure of the Department of Energy`s Working Capital Fund  

SciTech Connect

The Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development of the Committee on Appropriations, in its report dated July 16, 1996, approved the implementation of a Working Capital Fund (Fund) at the U.S. Department of Energy. The Subcommittee also directed the Office of Inspector General to conduct periodic audits of the Fund. This audit was conducted to determine if the Department established an effective system of controls over the Fund. The specific objectives were to determine if internal controls were sufficient to ensure that appropriate costs were allocated in a reasonable and unbiased manner and in a way what was consistent with the expectations established by the Congress.

1997-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

151

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11, 2010 11, 2010 CX-004575: Categorical Exclusion Determination Native Village of Council Alaska Energy Efficiency Retrofits CX(s) Applied: A1, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 01/11/2010 Location(s): Council, Alaska Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy January 11, 2010 CX-004618: Categorical Exclusion Determination Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma - Residential and Commercial Building Energy Audits CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 01/11/2010 Location(s): Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy January 8, 2010 CX-004576: Categorical Exclusion Determination Native Village of Kivalina of Alaska Energy Distribution CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/08/2010 Location(s): Kivalina, Alaska Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy January 8, 2010 CX-004600: Categorical Exclusion Determination

152

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 26, 2009 October 26, 2009 CX-004629: Categorical Exclusion Determination Seneca Nation of New York Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategies CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 10/26/2009 Location(s): New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy October 26, 2009 CX-004628: Categorical Exclusion Determination Seneca Nation of New York Energy Efficiency and Conservation Programs for Buildings and Facilities CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 10/26/2009 Location(s): New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy October 26, 2009 CX-004627: Categorical Exclusion Determination Seneca Nation of New York Energy Audits CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 10/26/2009 Location(s): New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy October 23, 2009

153

Audit Report: IG-0753  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Resolution of Significant Finding Resolution of Significant Finding Investigation Recommendations DOE/IG- November 2002 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services Recovery of Costs for the Proprietary Use of the Advanced Photon Source DOE/IG-0753 January 2007 Department of Energy Washing<~n, DC 20585 January 11, 2007 MEMORANDUM FOR TEE SECRETARY FROM: Greg + ? * y . n e man Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Recovery of Costs for the Proprietary Use of the Advanced Photon Source1' BACKGROUND The Department of Energy is responsible for the operation of the Advanced Photon Source, a light source user facility at the Argonne National Laboratory. The facility was, until recently, operated for the Department by the University of Chicago. It is currently

154

Southwestern Federal Power System 1995 Financial Statement audit under the Chief Financial Officers Act (WR-FC-96-02)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Southwestern Federal Power System encompasses the operation of 24 hydroelectric power plants by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the marketing of power and energy from those plants by the Southwestern Power Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy. To integrate the operation of these hydroelectric generating plants and to transmit power from the dams to its customers, Southwestern Power Administration (Southwestern) maintains 2,220 kilometers (1,380 miles) of high-voltage transmission lines, 24 substations, and 46 microwave and VHF radio sites. Southwestern`s headquarters are in Tulsa, Oklahoma; its dispatch center is in Springfield, Missouri; and its maintenance crews are based in Jonesboro, Arkansas, in Gore and Tupelo, Oklahoma, and in Springfield, Missouri. Three offices - Power Marketing and Delivery, Maintenance, and Administration and Rates - are responsible for meeting Southwestern`s mission. Twelve of the 24 generating plants are scheduled directly by Southwestern, and a total of 19 contribute to the interconnected system operations. Generation at the five remaining projects (Denison, Narrows, Sam Rayburn, Whitney, and Willis) is used to serve specific customer loads. At the end of fiscal year 1995, Southwestern marketed power and energy to 10 generation and transmission cooperatives, one distribution cooperative, three military installations, 44 municipal utilities, and three municipal utility joint-action agencies. One of the joint-action agencies has its own allocation of power from Southwestern; the other two serve 33 municipal utilities to whom Southwestern has allocated power. The total number of power allocation customers is 92. Additionally, excess energy is occasionally sold to non-allocation utilities.

NONE

1996-02-22T23:59:59.000Z

155

Fermilab | Directorate | Internal Audit Services | Risk Assessment and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Risk Assessment and Planning Risk Assessment and Planning How are topics selected for an internal audit? A Year At A Glance Throughout the year we collect ideas and input from the Board of Directors Audit Committee, Management, DOE Fermi Site Office and DOE Office of Inspector General. We also reference the Contractor Assurance System (CAS) web pages for information about the structure of the systems. In addition, CAS (management system) owners are interviewed with respect to Internal Audit's risk assessments and audit plans. We prepare reports that summarize the results of individual audits, as well issue an annual report of activities. Internal audit reports are distributed as they are issued, to a wide audience including the Audit Committee, Management, the DOE Fermi Site Office, the DOE Chicago Office,

156

Audit Report: IG-0840 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

40 40 Audit Report: IG-0840 September 23, 2010 The Department of Energy's Audit Resolution and Follow-up Process The Department of Energy's audit resolution and follow-up process provides an important mechanism for assisting management in improving the performance of the Department and its programs. Over the last 5 years, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) has completed over 350 audits, which included recommendations for corrective actions or improvements in programs, operations, and management functions. Ensuring that these recommendations are addressed and resolved timely is a critical component of the audit process. With this goal in mind, Department Order 224.3, Audit Resolution and Followup Program, generally requires that audit reports and all associated recommendations be closed within one year and that

157

Audit Report - Department of Energy's Isotope Development and Production for Research and Applications Program's Fiscal Year 2010 Balance Sheet Audit, OAS-FS-13-09  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audits and Inspections Audits and Inspections Audit Report Department of Energy's Isotope Development and Production for Research and Applications Program's Fiscal Year 2010 Balance Sheet Audit OAS-FS-13-09 January 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF SCIENCE FROM: Daniel M. Weeber Assistant Inspector General for Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION Production for Research and Applications Program's Fiscal Year 2010 Balance Sheet Audit The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Department of Energy's Isotope Development and Production for Research and Applications Program's (Isotope Program) and 2009. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) engaged the independent public accounting firm of

158

Audit Manual release 3.0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This manual consolidates into one document the policies, procedures, standards, technical guidance and other techniques to be followed by the Assistant Inspector General for Audits and staff in planning and conducting audit work within DOE and in preparing related reports on behalf of the Office of Inspector General.

Not Available

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services Audit Report The State of Illinois Weatherization Assistance Program OAS-RA-11-01 October 2010 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 14, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The State of Illinois Weatherization Assistance Program" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program received $5 billion under the

160

Audit Report: OAS-L-09-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7325.8 7325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: October 30,2008 Audit Report Nuniber: OAS-L-09-01 REPLY TO AITN OF: IG-30 (A08GT053) SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Review of the Department of Energy's Contract with AHTNA Government Services Corporation Contract No: DE-AC52-04NA25282" TO: Director, Office of Field Financial Management, NNSA INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) awarded a general construction contract to AHTNA Government Services Corporation (AHTNA), an Alaskan Native Corporation (ANC), in September 2004. The contract was awarded under the Small Business Administration (SBA) Section 8(a) small disadvantaged business program to provide design, construction, and engineering services for radiation sensors and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Audit Report: IG-0527 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 Audit Report: IG-0527 September 28, 2001 Idaho Operations Office Mixed Low-Level Waste Disposal Plans During the 1970s and 1980s, about 65,000 cubic meters of reinsurance waste...

162

Audit Report: IG-0434 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 Audit Report: IG-0434 December 18, 1998 Waste Inventory Data at Oak Ridge and Savannah River The Oak Ridge and Savannah River Operations Offices are responsible for maintaining...

163

Audit Report: IG-0435 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 Audit Report: IG-0435 January 7, 1999 Review of the U.S. Department of Energy's Aircraft Activities On October 19, 1998, you asked that the Office of Inspector General (OIG)...

164

Audit Report: IG-0498 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 Audit Report: IG-0498 March 21, 2001 Bechtel Jacobs Company LLC's Management and Integration Contract at Oak Ridge In December 1997, the Oak Ridge Operations Office entered into...

165

Audit Report: IG-0560 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Audit Report: IG-0560 June 24, 2002 The Department of Energy's Tritium Extraction Facility On March 19, 2002, you asked the Office of Inspector General to conduct an expedited...

166

Audit Report: IG-0514 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

14 July 19, 2001 Administrative Control of the Hanford Reach National Monument In January 1997, the Office of Inspector General issued Report DOEIG-0399, Audit of the U.S....

167

Audit Report: IG-0515 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

30, 2001 Control of Classified Matter at Paducah From April 2001 through May 2001 the Office of the Inspector General conducted an audit to determine whether the Department and...

168

Audit Report: IG-0631 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 Audit Report: IG-0631 December 12, 2003 Implementation of Indications, Warning, Analysis and Reporting Capability A significant number of the Department of Energy (Department) sites were not taking appropriate action to report computer attacks, probes, or compromises. Specifically, computer incidents were not always being reported to the Computer Incident Advisory Capability (CIAC) as required by Departmental guidance. Office of Inspector General Technology Crimes Section (Technology Crimes) and Federal counterintelligence officials were also not always notified of incidents as appropriate. Audit Report: IG-0631 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0500 The Department's Cyber Security Incident Management Program, IG-0787 Audit Report: IG-0787

169

Special Audit of Pension Plans for Department of Energy Contract Employees of the University of California, IG-0394  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(08-93) United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE: August 19, 1996 REPLY TO ATTN. OF: IG-1 SUBJECT INFORMATION: Report on "Special Audit of Pension Plans for Department of Energy Contract Employees of the University of California" TO: The Secretary BACKGROUND: The Office of Inspector General has issued several audit reports on the pension plans operated for Departmental contract employees, including those for the employees of the University of California operated laboratories. In general, the reports have recommended methods for improved Departmental management of the pension plans for those employees. On May 15, 1996, the Department of Energy

170

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20,20 10 20,20 10 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: DOE Office of Inspector General Audit Report "The Department of Energy's Management of Contractor Fines, Penalties and Legal Costs" SUMMARY: Please review the attached DOE Office of Inspector General Audit Report "The Department of Energy's Management of Contractor Fines, Penalties and Legal Costs," especially Recommendation 2.a. That Recommendation requires the Senior Procurement Executive, in conjunction with the field site Counsels, to review high-value (which you should define as above $SoOK) outside law f i r m invoices for the period identified in the report to ensure no unallowable

171

Southwestern Federal Power System's Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Statement Audit, OAS-FS-13-06  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Southwestern Federal Power Southwestern Federal Power System's Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Statement Audit OAS-FS-13-06 November 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits & Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 29, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION FROM: Daniel M. Weeber Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Administration Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Southwestern Federal Power System's Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Statement Audit" The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Southwestern Federal Power System's (SWFPS) combined balance sheets, as of September 30,

172

Environmental Audit of the Alaska Power Administration  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report documents the results of the Comprehensive Baseline Environmental Audit of the Alaska Power Administration (APA) headquartered in Juneau, Alaska. This Audit was conducted by the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Office of Environmental Audit (EH-24) from August 24 to December 8, 1992. The scope of the Audit was comprehensive, covering all environmental programs and activities with the exception of those relating to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Specifically considered was the compliance status of APA regarding Federal, state, and local statutes and regulations, DOE Orders and Directives, and best management practices. The technical disciplines addressed by the Audit were: air, surface water/drinking water, groundwater, waste management, toxic and chemical materials, quality assurance, inactive waste sites, and environmental management. Due to the nature of the activities carried out at the two Federal hydroelectric projects operated by APA, the area of radiation was not investigated during the Audit.

Not Available

1992-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

Environmental Audit of the Alaska Power Administration  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report documents the results of the Comprehensive Baseline Environmental Audit of the Alaska Power Administration (APA) headquartered in Juneau, Alaska. This Audit was conducted by the US Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Environmental Audit (EH-24) from August 24 to December 8, 1992. The scope of the Audit was comprehensive, covering all environmental programs and activities with the exception of those relating to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Specifically considered was the compliance status of APA regarding Federal, state, and local statutes and regulations, DOE Orders and Directives, and best management practices. The technical disciplines addressed by the Audit were: air, surface water/drinking water, groundwater, waste management, toxic and chemical materials, quality assurance, inactive waste sites, and environmental management. Due to the nature of the activities carried out at the two Federal hydroelectric projects operated by APA, the area of radiation was not investigated during the Audit.

Not Available

1992-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

Internal Audit Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Internal Audit Services Internal Audit Services Berkeley Lab Internal Audit Services Internal Audit Services Berkeley Lab Contacts Organizational Chart IAS Search Staff Only Lab Search Phone Book A-Z Index Privacy and Security Notice "Internal Auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization's operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control and governance processes." The Institute of Internal Auditors Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing About IAS | Audit Committee | Audit Planning | Ethics & Investigations | External Audit Coordination Advisory Services | Other Relevant Audit Links | Contacts | Organizational

175

Audit Report on "The Department's Management of Nuclear Materials Provided to Domestic Licensees"  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The objective if to determine whether the Department of Energy (Department) was adequately managing its nuclear materials provided to domestic licensees. The audit was performed from February 2007 to September 2008 at Department Headquarters in Washington, DC, and Germantown, MD; the Oak Ridge Office and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, TN. In addition, we visited or obtained data from 40 different non-Departmental facilities in various states. To accomplish the audit objective, we: (1) Reviewed Departmental and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements for the control and accountability of nuclear materials; (2) Analyzed a Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System (NMMSS) report with ending inventory balances for Department-owned nuclear materials dated September 30, 2007, to determine the amount and types of nuclear materials located at non-Department domestic facilities; (3) Held discussions with Department and NRC personnel that used NMMSS information to determine their roles and responsibilities related to the control and accountability over nuclear materials; (4) Selected a judgmental sample of 40 non-Department domestic facilities; (5) Met with licensee officials and sent confirmations to determine whether their actual inventories of Department-owned nuclear materials were consistent with inventories reported in the NMMSS; and, (6) Analyzed historical information related to the 2004 NMMSS inventory rebaselining initiative to determine the quantity of Department-owned nuclear materials that were written off from the domestic licensees inventory balances. This performance audit was conducted in accordance with generally accepted Government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objective. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. The audit included tests of controls and compliance with laws and regulations related to managing the Department-owned nuclear materials provided to non-Departmental domestic licensees. Because our review was limited it would not necessarily have disclosed all internal control deficiencies that may have existed at the time of our audit. We examined the establishment of performance measures in accordance with Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, as they related to the audit objective. We found that the Department had established performance measures related to removing or disposing of nuclear materials and radiological sources around the world. We utilized computer generated data during our audit and performed procedures to validate the reliability of the information as necessary to satisfy our audit objective. As noted in the report, we questioned the reliability of the NMMSS data.

None

2009-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

Audit Followup 020904  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Resolution Audit Resolution Process DOE/IG-0639 February 2004 Audit Resolution Process Details of Finding ........................................................................1 Recommendations and Comments .............................................5 Appendices 1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology ......................................6 2. Prior Audit Reports .................................................................7 3. Management Comments ........................................................8 THE DEPARTMENT'S AUDIT RESOLUTION PROCESS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Recommendation Resolution and Closure Process The Department of Energy's (Department) current audit resolution process does not always ensure timely and appropriate closure of audit

177

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management of the NSLS-II Project Management of the NSLS-II Project OAS-RA-L-10-01 April 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (4/93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: April 6, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-10-01 REPLY TO ATTN TO: IG-32 (A10RA006) SUBJECT: Report on "The Department of Energy's Management of the NSLS-II Project" TO: Manager, Brookhaven Site Office, SC-BHSO INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy's (Department) Office of Science is currently constructing the National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (Brookhaven) in Upton, New York. The NSLS-II is designed to replace the existing

178

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department's Infrastructure Department's Infrastructure Modernization Projects under the Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 OAS-RA-L-11-04 March 2011 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: March 2, 2011 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-04 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A10RA032) SUBJECT: Report on "The Department's Infrastructure Modernization Projects under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009" TO: Manager, Oak Ridge Office Manager, Berkeley Site Office INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) was enacted on February 17, 2009. The goals of the Recovery Act are to retain or create jobs, increase

179

Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River Protection  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 Site: HANFORD - Office of River Protection Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Operational Awareness at the Office of River Protection Dates of Activity : 05/13-23/2013 Report Preparer: Robert. E. Farrell Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the Office of River Protection (ORP) to observe contractor efforts to develop a hazards analysis for the Low Activity Waste facility of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), tour the WTP construction site, observe ORP's quality assurance audit of the WTP contractor (Bechtel National, Inc.), tour the

180

Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River Protection  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 Site: HANFORD - Office of River Protection Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Operational Awareness at the Office of River Protection Dates of Activity : 05/13-23/2013 Report Preparer: Robert. E. Farrell Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the Office of River Protection (ORP) to observe contractor efforts to develop a hazards analysis for the Low Activity Waste facility of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), tour the WTP construction site, observe ORP's quality assurance audit of the WTP contractor (Bechtel National, Inc.), tour the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Department of Energy's Isotope Development and Production for Research and Applications Program's Fiscal Year 2010 Balance Sheet Audit, OAS-FS-13-11  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy's Isotope Development and Production for Research and Applications Program's Fiscal Year 2010 Balance Sheet Audit OAS-FS-13-11 February 2013 January 31, 2013 Mr. Gregory Friedman, Inspector General Dr. Jehanne Gillo, Director, Facilities and Project Management Division, Office of Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Dear Mr. Friedman and Dr. Gillo: We have audited the balance sheet of the United States Department of Energy's (Department or DOE) Isotope Development and Production for Research and Applications Program (the Program) (a component of the Department) as of September 30, 2010, and have issued our report thereon dated December 21, 2012. In planning and performing our audit of the balance sheet, in accordance with auditing standards

182

Management Letter on the Department of Energy's Isotope Development and Production for Research and Applications Program's Fiscal Year 2009 Balance Sheet Audit, OAS-FS-12-09  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 Balance 09 Balance Sheet Audit OAS-FS-12-09 June 2012 January 30, 2012 Mr. Gregory Friedman, Inspector General Dr. Jehanne Gillo, Director, Facilities and Project Management Division, Office of Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Dear Mr. Friedman and Dr. Gillo: We have audited the balance sheet of the United States Department of Energy's (Department or DOE) Isotope Development and Production for Research and Applications Program (the Program) (a component of the Department) as of September 30, 2009, and have issued our report thereon dated January 30, 2012. In planning and performing our audit of the balance sheet, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, we considered the Program's internal control over financial

183

Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-07-06 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

06 Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-07-06 January 21, 2007 Office of Science's Implementation of the Federal Information Security Management Act Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-12-06 More...

184

Audit Report: WR-B-97-03 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Audit Report: WR-B-97-03 November 15, 1996 Audit of Groundwater Monitoring at Hanford The Department of Energy (Department), Richland Operations Office (Richland) is responsible...

185

Audit Report: OAS-L-08-16 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Audit Report: OAS-L-08-16 August 18, 2008 Agreed-Upon Procedures for Federal Payroll The Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 07-04 (Bulletin), "Audit Requirements for...

186

Audit Report: OAS-L-03-11 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OAS-L-03-11 Audit Report: OAS-L-03-11 February 26, 2003 Audit of the Office of Science Infrastructure Modernization Initiatives The purpose of this report is to inform you of the...

187

Two Stories of Successful Energy Audits | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Two Stories of Successful Energy Audits Two Stories of Successful Energy Audits Two Stories of Successful Energy Audits September 16, 2008 - 3:37pm Addthis Elizabeth Spencer Communicator, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Hello, everyone! Last week, John Lippert gave an excellent and extremely thorough overview of the energy audit process, including what an audit is, how it works, and how you can find an auditor. To further emphasize how an energy audit can help you, I decided to go out and interview two people here in the office who had energy audits done to their homes. The two people I interviewed lived in very different areas, with very different homes, and yet their energy audits identified significant areas for improvement for both of them. This only goes to prove that no matter how efficient you think you are, or how new your home may be, you can

188

Two Stories of Successful Energy Audits | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Two Stories of Successful Energy Audits Two Stories of Successful Energy Audits Two Stories of Successful Energy Audits September 16, 2008 - 3:37pm Addthis Elizabeth Spencer Communicator, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Hello, everyone! Last week, John Lippert gave an excellent and extremely thorough overview of the energy audit process, including what an audit is, how it works, and how you can find an auditor. To further emphasize how an energy audit can help you, I decided to go out and interview two people here in the office who had energy audits done to their homes. The two people I interviewed lived in very different areas, with very different homes, and yet their energy audits identified significant areas for improvement for both of them. This only goes to prove that no matter how efficient you think you are, or how new your home may be, you can

189

DATE: TO:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41 41 4 DATE: TO: September 2,2008 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Procurement Data System Coding (FPDS) for Hurricane Gustav SUMMARY: An emergency declaration was made in preparation for Hurricane Gustav. The effective date for this declaration was August 29,2008. FPDS has been updated to include Hurricane Gustav as a choice in the data field "National Interest Action." When making an award to support the emergency, please ensure FPDS is properly coded. This Flash will be available online within a day, at the following website: http://www.rnananement.ener~y.~ov/policy guidance/policy flasheshtm. Questions concerning this policy flash should be

190

DATE: TO:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28 28 - DATE: TO: v POLICY FLASH 2008-28 February 19,2008 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA41 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2008-06, Domestic and Foreign Procurement Preference Requirements SUMMARY: AL 2008-06 (attached) replaces AL 2002-06, dated 08/14/02, "Domestic and Foreign Procurement Preference Rules," which is hereby canceled. AL 2002-06 disseminated deviations to FAR provisions and clauses relating to foreign acquisition for use by Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and Power Marketing Administration (PMA) contracting activities. This new AL provides updated deviations to the FAR provisions and clauses for use by DOE,

191

Enterprise-Wide Audit-Data Management  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Direct Auditing Devices Normalize Audit Data Reduce Audit Data Store Audit Data Detect Local Events Report Local Events ...

2012-10-26T23:59:59.000Z

192

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Inspector General Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services Audit Report Department of Energy Efforts to Manage Information Technology Resources in an Energy-Efficient and Environmentally Responsible Manner OAS-RA-09-03 May 2009 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 May 27, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Department of Energy Efforts to Manage Information Technology Resources in an Energy-Efficient and Environmentally Responsible Manner" BACKGROUND The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 emphasizes energy efficiency and conservation as critical to the Nation's economic vitality; its goal of reducing dependence

193

Audit Report: IG-0441 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 Audit Report: IG-0441 March 16, 1999 Cost Sharing at Basic Energy Sciences' User Facilities The Department of Energy's Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES) funds the construction and operation of 17 designated user facilities that are recognized as being critical to scientific research. BES provides the base-operating budget for its user facilities and generally makes the facilities available on a no-charge basis to all qualified researchers. The objective of the audit was to determine whether the Department could enhance scientific research at BES user facilities by seeking more opportunities for cost sharing. Audit Report: IG-0441 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0562 Audit Report: IG-0753 Semiannual Report to Congress: October 1, 1998 - March 31

194

Internal Audit Process  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 Internal Audit Process 110304 Page 1 of 7 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: Internal Audit Process Document Number: P-007 Rev. 110304 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa...

195

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report Audit Report The Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for the City of Phoenix - Agreed-Upon Procedures OAS-RA-11-03 November 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 30, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: "The Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for the City of Phoenix - Agreed-Upon Procedures" Audit Report No.: OAS-RA-11-03

196

DATE: TO: POLICY FLASH L 110-  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

L 110- L 110- June 1,2010 Procurement Directors FROM: Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 1 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Supplemental Audit Services SUMMARY: The Office of Procurement and Assistance Management (OPAM) awarded a contract for supplemental audit services on May 12,20 10. The purpose of this contract is to perform audit services in support of both financial assistance and contractual instrument awards department-wide. Although the focus of this contract is for auditing ARRA work, other non- ARRA auditing services may also be ordered. The contract is with KPMG LLP and is an Indefinite-Delivery-Indefinite-Quantity type and was awarded on a Time-and-Materials basis. The contract runs through May 1 1,20 15 and has a

197

Summary of Audit Report: IG-0772  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services The National Nuclear Security Administration's Management of Classified Weapons Parts DOE/IG-0772 July 2007 This document provides a summary of an Audit Report that is not publicly releasable. Public release is controlled pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act This is ( I .sr~mmclry qf A ut fit Report IG-0 772, entitled "The Natiotoncl I Nucleclr Seczdritj' Administr~rtion's Munrcgement of Clnssrfieci Weapons Purls. " The complete report is not crvc~il~rhle for p~dhlic disclosu~e. BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) maintains the safety, security, reliability and perfomiance of the United States nuclear

198

Audit Report: IG-0878 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report: IG-0878 Audit Report: IG-0878 Audit Report: IG-0878 December 11, 2012 Follow-up Audit of the Department's Cyber Security Incident Management Program The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 requires each agency to implement procedures for detecting, reporting and responding to cyber security incidents, including notifying and consulting with the Federal information security incident center, law enforcement agencies and Inspectors General. To meet this requirement and counter the threat posed by cyber attacks, the Department's Office of the Chief Information Officer, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and a number of field sites established organizations to provide expertise in preventing, detecting, responding to and recovering from cyber security incidents. In

199

Audit of The U.S. Department of Energy's Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (as of September 30, 1995), IG-FS-96-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES AUDIT OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION (As of September 30, 1995)

200

Review of Selected Home Energy Auditing Tools  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REVIEW OF SELECTED HOME REVIEW OF SELECTED HOME ENERGY AUDITING TOOLS In Support of the Development of a National Building Performance Assessment and Rating Program Prepared for: The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Prepared by: SENTECH, Inc. (now part of SRA International, Inc.) November 2, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... 2 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 4 3. ENERGY AUDIT TOOL TYPES ................................................................................. 5

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL ISEMIANNUAL REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Office of Inspector General INTERNAL AUDIT CHARTER Introduction Internal auditing is an independent procedures for the Office of Inspector General have been established and presented for review to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes. The Office

Christian, Eric

202

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2009 6, 2009 CX-000077: Categorical Exclusion Determination Alexandria's Audits, Revolving Loan, Fleet Hybrid Vehicles, Renewable Energy Feasibility Study (Streetlight and Green Roof Retrofits) CX(s) Applied: B5.1, A1, A9, A11 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Alexandria, Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy November 16, 2009 CX-000308: Categorical Exclusion Determination Connecticut Revision 2 - Retrofit 9 State Buildings CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B1.3, B1.4, B1.5, B1.15, B1.23, B1.24, B1.31, B2.1, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 12, 2009 CX-000076: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tanana Chiefs Conference Traffic Signals and Street Lighting

203

2. audit committee bylaws  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

PROMOTING THE GLOBAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROFESSIONS CONCERNED WITH MINERALS,METALS,AND MATERIALS. AUDIT COMMITTEE...

204

Audit Committee - TMS  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Audit Committee ... Electronic Packaging and Interconnection Materials, ---- Energy Conversion and Storage, ---- Magnetic Materials, ---- Nanomaterials, ---- Thin...

205

Audit Report: IG-0457 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

57 57 Audit Report: IG-0457 January 24, 2000 Follow-up Audit of Program Administration by the Office of Science The Office of Science (SC), formerly known as the Office of Energy Research (ER), is responsible for approving and managing research projects funded at the Department's national laboratories. The laboratories submit field proposals for research projects to the SC for funding consideration. The proposals are evaluated and selected for funding by SC program managers, with support from a peer review process. The program managers approve the tasks and provide work authorizations and other funding guidance to the laboratories after specific projects have been selected. In FY 1999, SC provided $1.7 billion to the laboratories for research projects. Audit Report: IG-0457

206

Audit Report: IG-0457 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 7 Audit Report: IG-0457 January 24, 2000 Follow-up Audit of Program Administration by the Office of Science The Office of Science (SC), formerly known as the Office of Energy Research (ER), is responsible for approving and managing research projects funded at the Department's national laboratories. The laboratories submit field proposals for research projects to the SC for funding consideration. The proposals are evaluated and selected for funding by SC program managers, with support from a peer review process. The program managers approve the tasks and provide work authorizations and other funding guidance to the laboratories after specific projects have been selected. In FY 1999, SC provided $1.7 billion to the laboratories for research projects. Audit Report: IG-0457

207

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Preliminary Audit Report Preliminary Audit Report Management Controls over the Commonwealth of Virginia's Efforts to Implement the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Weatherization Assistance Program OAS-RA-10-11 May 2010 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 May 26, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY FROM: George W. Collard Assistant Inspector General for National Security and Energy Audits Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Preliminary Audit Report on "Management Controls over the Commonwealth of Virginia's Efforts to Implement the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Weatherization Assistance Program" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's (Department) Weatherization Assistance Program received $5 billion

208

Audit Report: WR-FS-97-03 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Flats Field Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996 Financial Statements The Government Management Reform Act of 1994 requires that the...

209

Audit Report: OAS-RA-12-06 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Management of Post-Recovery Act Workforce Transition at Office of Environmental Management Sites We conducted an audit to determine whether the Department of Energy...

210

Audit of the US Department of Energy`s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 1997  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report contains information on the Office of Inspector General audit of the Department`s Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of September 30, 1997.

NONE

1998-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

211

Audit Resolution  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Accounting and Reporting for the Accounting and Reporting for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act by the Department of Energy's Funding Recipients OAS-RA-10-06 April 2010 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 1, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Accounting and Reporting for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act by the Department of Energy's Funding Recipients" BACKGROUND The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) was established to jumpstart the U.S. economy, create or save millions of jobs, and invest in the Nation's energy future. The Department of Energy received approximately $37 billion through the Recovery Act

212

Audit Resolution  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Industrial Carbon Capture and Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage Program Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act OAS-RA-13-15 March 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 March 21, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage Program Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act" INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy received nearly $1.5 billion through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) to invest in clean industrial technologies and sequestration projects through the Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage Program (Carbon Program). The National Energy Technology Laboratory awarded 46 cooperative agreements to a

213

Audit Resolution  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

West Virginia West Virginia OAS-RA-11-09 June 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 13, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program Funded under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in the State of West Virginia" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program (Weatherization Program) received $5 billion under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) to improve the energy efficiency of residences owned or occupied by low-income persons. The Department subsequently awarded a three-year Recovery Act Weatherization Program grant of

214

Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspector General Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Work Plan for FY 2013 Audits Central Audits Division  Ecotality  Funding Overlap  Follow-up on Smart Grid Investment Grant  DOE's Loan Program Office's Portfolio Management  Office of Fossil Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships  Advanced Manufacturing Office's Combined Heat and Power Systems  DOE's Management of Contaminated Non-EM Facilities  Unneeded Real Estate  Review of For-Profit Grantees for selected DOE programs  Commercialization Efforts at National Laboratories  Research Misconduct at Office of Science  Public Dissemination of Research Results  BPA's Management of Borrowing Authority Construction  Controls Over PMA's Use of Hedging Instruments

215

Audit Report: IG-0878 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Audit Report: IG-0878 December 11, 2012 Follow-up Audit of the Department's Cyber Security Incident Management Program The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 requires each agency to implement procedures for detecting, reporting and responding to cyber security incidents, including notifying and consulting with the Federal information security incident center, law enforcement agencies and Inspectors General. To meet this requirement and counter the threat posed by cyber attacks, the Department's Office of the Chief Information Officer, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and a number of field sites established organizations to provide expertise in preventing, detecting, responding to and recovering from cyber security incidents. In

216

Audit Report: IG-0539 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Audit Report: IG-0539 January 11, 2002 Passive Magnetic Resonance Anomaly Mapping at Environmental Management Sites The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management supports the development and deployment of innovative environmental cleanup technologies. Environmental Management's Office of Science and Technology (OST) manages and directs a national program that provides the scientific foundation, new approaches, and new technologies that are intended to significantly reduce the risk, cost, and schedule for completion of the Department's cleanup mission. OST's policy is to perform peer reviews to evaluate the technical merit and plausibility of new technologies prior to expending Department resources on field tests. Audit Report: IG-0539 More Documents & Publications

217

Audit Report: IG-0771  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security Over Personally Identifiable Security Over Personally Identifiable Information DOE/IG-0771 July 2007 Department of Energy 'Sv'ashinyton, DC 20585 J u l y 30, 2007 MEMORAhTDUM FOR FROM: inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Security over Personally Identifiable Information" Industry experts have reported that more than 100 million personal privacy records have been lost or stolen over the past two years, including information maintained by corporations, educational institutions, and Federal government agencies. In fact, over the past several years, the Department of Energy has experienced the loss of personal privacy records. On June 23,2006, in response to security incidents involving the loss or compromise of sensitive personal information by several Federal agencies, the Office of

218

Audit Report: IG-0810  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Potential Uses for Depleted Uranium Potential Uses for Depleted Uranium Oxide DOE/IG-0810 January 2009 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 January 9 , 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR - I THYSECRETARY - FROM: Inspector General SUBJECT': INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Potential Uses For Depleted Uranium Oxide" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) manages approximately 700,000 metric tons of depleted uranium hexafluoride at the gaseous diffusion plants located near Paducah, Kentucky. and Portsmouth, Ohio. It plans to convert the depleted uranium hexafluoride to a stable material. The conversion process will produce approximately 55 1,000 metric tons of depleted uranium oxide - a relatively stable form that can be handled and disposed of by direct burial or, potentially, used in

219

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services Audit Report The Disposition of Uranium-233 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory DOE/IG-0834 February 2010 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 February 18, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Disposition of Uranium-233 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory" BACKGROUND As a result of the Department of Energy's nuclear weapons program legacy, its Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) stores about 1.4 metric tons of uranium containing 450 kilograms of uranium-233 (U-233). The material is currently stored in a

220

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department's Management of Cloud Department's Management of Cloud Computing Services OAS-RA-L-11-06 April 2011 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: April 1, 2011 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-06 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A11TG021) SUBJECT: Report on "Department's Management of Cloud Computing Services" TO: Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration Acting Under Secretary of Energy Under Secretary for Science Chief Information Officer INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Cloud computing enables convenient, on-demand access to shared computing resources that can be rapidly provided to users. According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and industry experts, benefits of the cloud computing model include the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management of the Tank Farm Management of the Tank Farm Recovery Act Infrastructure Upgrades Project OAS-RA-L-11-03 February 2011 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: February 9, 2011 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-03 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A10RA043) SUBJECT: Report on "Management of the Tank Farm Recovery Act Infrastructure Upgrades Project" TO: Manager, Office of River Protection INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) the Department of Energy (Department) awarded Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) approximately $324 million to accelerate completion of infrastructure upgrades for the Hanford Site's tank farms during the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009-2011 timeframe. These funds

222

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Warranties Involving Newly Constructed and Renovated Facilities at National Defense Laboratories OAS-M-10-02 June 2010 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 15, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGERS, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE, LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE, AND SANDIA SITE OFFICE FROM: George W. Collard Assistant Inspector General for National Security and Energy Audits Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Management Controls over Warranties Involving Newly Constructed and Renovated Facilities at National Defense Laboratories" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's (Department) National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) research, surveillance, and manufacturing capabilities are carried out in facilities, many of which

223

Internal Audit Preparation Worksheet  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 Internal Audit Preparation Job Aid 11_0304 Page 1 of 5 2 Internal Audit Preparation Job Aid 11_0304 Page 1 of 5 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Internal Audit Preparation Job Aid Document Number: F-012 Rev. 11_0304 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: P-007, Internal Audit Process Notify of Changes: Internal Auditors Referenced Document(s): F-011 Internal Audit Report F-012 Internal Audit Preparation Job Aid 11_0304 Page 2 of 5 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 11_0304 Change title from Worksheet to Job Aid and changed revision from alpha to numeric for consistency. F-012 Internal Audit Preparation Job Aid 11_0304 Page 3 of 5 Internal Audit Preparation Worksheet F-012 Internal Audit Preparation Job Aid 11_0304 Page 4 of 5

224

Office of Inspector General report on audit of the Department of Energy`s grant for economic development at the Mound Plant  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The downsizing of the Department of Energy`s (Department) facilities as a result of the end of the Cold War had a negative impact on communities that were heavily dependent on the Department`s operations for economic stability. To lessen the impact, the Department provided financial assistance to local communities through Federal grants and cooperative agreements. The objective of this audit was to determine whether funding provided for economic development at the Mount Plant was used for the Department`s intended purposes. Overall, the authors found that the Department`s funds were used for their intended purposes. However, contrary to Federal regulations, the Department advanced the City of Miamisburg, Ohio (City) $2.6 million more than the minimum funds needed to meet immediate cash requirements, and the City kept the majority of the funds in non-interest bearing accounts. The funds were provided to fulfill commitments previously made to the City by senior Department officials, and the Department did not require the City to comply with Federal regulations or grant terms regarding cash advances. As a result, the City held a cash advance of $2.6 million for more than a year and remitted only $10,000 in interest earned on the advance. Management agreed with the finding and recommendations and initiated the appropriate corrective actions.

NONE

1997-02-14T23:59:59.000Z

225

Office of Inspector General audit report on ``The U.S. Department of Energy`s X-Change 1997: The global D and D marketplace conference``  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy and Florida International University (FIU), a state university, cosponsored the X-Change 1997: The Global D and D Marketplace conference (X-Change Conference) that was held December 1--5, 1997, in Miami, Florida. The purpose of the conference was to disseminate information on decontamination and decommissioning problems, solutions, and technologies to an international audience of government, industry, and academia. Through a contract with the Department, FIU was responsible for conference planning, organization, and logistical support. FIU awarded a subcontract to ICF, Inc. to work on the conference. ICF, Inc. is a major Department contractor with responsibilities for projects at Hanford, Argonne National laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory. The audit objectives were to determine whether FIU had controls in place to ensure that public funds were used appropriately, and whether fiscal practices associated with the conference were consistent with Government requirements and Department policy. FIU implemented accounting and budget mechanisms to identify and control the sources and uses of funds. However, the absence of a Departmental policy on funding conferences resulted in questionable fiscal practices associated with the conference. These are discussed.

1998-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

226

Southwestern Federal Power System's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Southwestern Federal Power Southwestern Federal Power System's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit OAS-FS-13-13 August 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 12, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION FROM: Daniel M. Weeber Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Administration Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Southwestern Federal Power System's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Southwestern Federal Power System's (SWFPS) combined balance sheets, as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related combined statements of changes in

227

Audit Report: IG-0481 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81 81 Audit Report: IG-0481 September 12, 2000 The Decontamination and Decommissioning Contract at the East Tennessee Technology Park The East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP), formerly known as the K-25 Site, contains about 400 buildings and 4,700 acres on the Oak Ridge Reservation. The K-25 Site was established in 1942 to produce enriched uranium. Since the production mission ended in 1987, the Oak Ridge Operations Office (Operations Office) has focused on environmental management of the site. Audit Report: IG-0481 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0611 Preliminary Notice of Violation, BNFL, Inc - EA-2003-01 Above on the left is K-25, at Oak Ridge before and after the 844,000 sq-ft demolition. In addition, on the right: K Cooling Tower at Savannah River Site demolition.

228

Audit Report: IG-0639 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Audit Report: IG-0639 February 17, 2004 The Department's Audit Resolution Process At the Department of Energy, as with all government agencies, correcting internal control weaknesses is essential to improving the effectiveness and efficiency of activities. Over the past several years, the Office of Inspector General and the U.S. General Accounting Office have issued a number of findings and recommendations addressing numerous aspects of the Department's programs, operations, and management functions. In many cases, the Department concurred with the findings and took or is in the process of taking corrective actions to resolve problems or improve the efficiency of its operations. Audit Report: IG-0639 More Documents & Publications Semiannual Report to Congress: October 1, 2003 - March 31, 2004

229

Lighting energy audit workbook  

SciTech Connect

A simple test to determine the need for a lighting energy audit is followed by how-to information on conducting the audit, identifying savings opportunities, and developing an energy management plan for lighting.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

Energy Saver 101 Infographic: Home Energy Audits | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Saver 101 Infographic: Home Energy Audits Saver 101 Infographic: Home Energy Audits Energy Saver 101 Infographic: Home Energy Audits August 15, 2013 - 3:19pm Addthis New Energy Saver 101 infographic breaks down a home energy audit, explaining what energy auditors look for and the special tools they use to determine where a home is wasting energy. | Infographic by Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. New Energy Saver 101 infographic breaks down a home energy audit, explaining what energy auditors look for and the special tools they use to determine where a home is wasting energy. | Infographic by Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Rebecca Matulka Rebecca Matulka Digital Communications Specialist, Office of Public Affairs What are the key facts? A home energy audit is the first step to saving energy and money.

231

Management and Operating Contractors' Subcontract Audit Coverage, IG-0885  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management and Operating Management and Operating Contractors' Subcontract Audit Coverage DOE/IG-0885 April 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 17, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report on "Management and Operating Contractors' Subcontract Audit Coverage" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (Department) employs 28 Management and Operating (M&O) contractors that perform essential mission work under cost reimbursable contracts. To achieve the Department's mission, M&O contractors often utilize the services of subcontractors, which

232

Audit of energy research telecommunications data networks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Research is implementing a new telecommunications data network called the Energy Sciences Network (ESNET). The purpose of our audit was to determine if ESNET will be a cost-effective means of upgrading networking support for Energy Research programs.

Not Available

1989-07-20T23:59:59.000Z

233

Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-10-02  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8-25-93 8-25-93 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE: October 2 1,2009 ~ u d i t Report Number: OAS-L- 10-02 ~~.~~ IG-32 1 (A08LV022) SUBJECT: Report on the "Follow-up Audit of Test Readiness at the Nevada ~ e s t Site" Manager, Nevada Site Office INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE As part of a self-imposed moratorium on testing, the United States has not conducted an explosive nuclear test since 1992. Since that time, the Department of Energy's (Department) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has used the Stockpile Stewardship Program, an effort that includes analytical simulation, laboratory experiments, and weapons refurbishments, to maintain the stockpile without nuclear testing. Under current national policy, however, the Department may be called upon, within a three-year timeframe, to

234

Audit Report: IG-0396 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 Audit Report: IG-0396 September 13, 1996 Audit of the Department of Energy's Contractor Liability Insurance Costs Audit Report: IG-0396 More Documents & Publications Audit...

235

Audit Report: IG-0405 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 Audit Report: IG-0405 May 20, 1997 Audit of the Savannah River Site's Quality Control Program for Groundwater Sampling Audit Report: IG-0405 More Documents & Publications Audit...

236

Audit Report: IG-0371 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 Audit Report: IG-0371 April 7, 1995 Audit of the Department of Energy's Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory Audit Report: IG-0371 More Documents & Publications Audit...

237

Audit Report: IG-0375 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 Audit Report: IG-0375 June 20, 1995 Audit of the Department of Energy's Management of Precious Metals Audit Report: IG-0375 More Documents & Publications Audit Report:...

238

Audit Report: IG-0407 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 Audit Report: IG-0407 June 17, 1997 Audit of the Department of Energy's Scientific and Technical Information Process Audit Report: IG-0407 More Documents & Publications Audit...

239

Audit Report: IG-0382 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 Audit Report: IG-0382 December 1, 1995 Audit of the Department of Energy's Site Safeguards and Security Plans Audit Report: IG-0382 More Documents & Publications Audit Report:...

240

Audit Report: IG-0374 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 Audit Report: IG-0374 June 20, 1995 Audit of the DOE's Commercial Laboratory Quality Assurance Evaluation Program Audit Report: IG-0374 More Documents & Publications Audit...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Audit Report: IG-0410 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 Audit Report: IG-0410 July 15, 1997 Audit of Environmental Restoration at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Audit Report: IG-0410 More Documents & Publications Audit Report:...

242

Department of Energy's Nuclear Waste Fund's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nuclear Nuclear Waste Fund's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statements OAS-FS-13-05 November 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits & Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 28, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF STANDARD CONTRACT MANAGEMENT, OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Department of Energy's Nuclear Waste Fund's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit" The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Department of Energy's Nuclear Waste Fund's (Fund) Fiscal Year 2012 balance sheet and the

243

Analytical laboratory quality audits  

SciTech Connect

Analytical Laboratory Quality Audits are designed to improve laboratory performance. The success of the audit, as for many activities, is based on adequate preparation, precise performance, well documented and insightful reporting, and productive follow-up. Adequate preparation starts with definition of the purpose, scope, and authority for the audit and the primary standards against which the laboratory quality program will be tested. The scope and technical processes involved lead to determining the needed audit team resources. Contact is made with the auditee and a formal audit plan is developed, approved and sent to the auditee laboratory management. Review of the auditee's quality manual, key procedures and historical information during preparation leads to better checklist development and more efficient and effective use of the limited time for data gathering during the audit itself. The audit begins with the opening meeting that sets the stage for the interactions between the audit team and the laboratory staff. Arrangements are worked out for the necessary interviews and examination of processes and records. The information developed during the audit is recorded on the checklists. Laboratory management is kept informed of issues during the audit so there are no surprises at the closing meeting. The audit report documents whether the management control systems are effective. In addition to findings of nonconformance, positive reinforcement of exemplary practices provides balance and fairness. Audit closure begins with receipt and evaluation of proposed corrective actions from the nonconformances identified in the audit report. After corrective actions are accepted, their implementation is verified. Upon closure of the corrective actions, the audit is officially closed.

Kelley, William D.

2001-06-11T23:59:59.000Z

244

Office of Inspector General | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites

Inspector General Inspector General Search Search form Search Office of Inspector General Office of Inspector General Services Services Home Hotline Whistleblower Ombudsman FOIA Reports Reports Home Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Recovery Act Home Recovery Act Reports Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission Mission Home Audits & Inspections Investigations Management & Administration About Us About Us Home Leadership Careers Careers Home Auditor Criminal Investigator Inspector Other Positions Vacancies Audits & Inspections Investigations Management & Administration Field Offices Contact Us Offices You are here Energy Department » Office of Inspector General Office of Inspector General Office of Inspector General

245

Audit Report: IG-0666 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

666 666 Audit Report: IG-0666 November 30, 2004 Audit Report on "The Los Alamos Neutron Science Center" The Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE), located at Los Alamos National Laboratory (Los Alamos), was constructed in 1972. LANSCE is a national user facility that provices pulsed protons and spallation neutrons for defense and civilian research and related applications. Its primary mission is to support the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) stockpile stewardship activities; the Oiffice of Science in the areas of neutron scattering and nuclear physcis research; and, the Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology in radioactive isotope production. NNSA provided $65 million of LANSCE's $90 million Fiscal Year 2003 budget and

246

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solar - Roof Mounted - Ebay CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02082011 Location(s): South Jordan, Utah Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February...

247

Audit Report: IG-0476 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

76 76 Audit Report: IG-0476 July 7, 2000 Best Practices for Environmental Management Baseline Development In February 1999, you directed the Office of Environmental Management (EM) to implement controls to correct weaknesses in the environmental liability estimate identified during the Fiscal Year 1998 financial statement audit. You also requested the Office of Inspector General (OIG) to conduct an interim status review to ensure that these controls were sufficient to correct the weaknesses. In August 1999, the OIG reported that completed and planned corrective actions by EM and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) should improve the liability estimate. These actions also had a positive impact on EM's project management through improvements in its baseline development processes.

248

Audit Report: WR-FS-99-01 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9-01 9-01 Audit Report: WR-FS-99-01 March 16, 1999 Report On Mater Identified At the Idaho Operations Office During The Audit Of The Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1998 Financial Statements The Government Management Reform Act of 1994 requires that the Department of Energy (DOE) annually submit audited financial statements to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). A Departmentwide audit was conducted to determine whether there was reasonable assurance that DOE's consolidated Fiscal Year (FY) 1998 financial statements were free of material misstatements. We conducted a portion of the Departmentwide audit at the Idaho Operations Office (Idaho) and its management and operating contractor, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company (Lockheed). Audit Report: WR-FS-99-01

249

Issue Date: Expiration Date:  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Discussion: Enclosed for your review and comment are the draft revisions to the FSME Procedure SA-103, Reviewing the Common Indicator, Technical Staffing and Training. SA-103 procedure describes the process and guidelines to be used by IMPEP team members when reviewing the adequacy of an NRC Region or States program for the staffing and training of technical personnel. We would appreciate receiving your comments within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this communication, please contact me at 301-415-3340 or the individual named below.

Training; Robert J. Lewis; Robert J. Lewis; A. Duncan White

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

Audit Report: OAS-L-11-03 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Audit Report: OAS-L-11-03 March 8, 2011 Audit of National Security Technologies, LLS Internal Audit Function National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), has managed and operated the Nevada National Security Site since July 1, 2006, for the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Nevada Site Office. NSTec is a joint venture between Northrop Grumman Corporation (Northrop Grumman), AECOM, CH2M Hill, and Nuclear Fuel Services. The contract requires NSTec to establish and maintain an independent internal audit function and to develop an Internal Audit Implementation Design that describes the audit organization, lines of reporting, oversight responsibilities, and auditing standards to be followed. Topic: Management & Administration Audit Report: OAS-L-11-03

251

Audit Report - Follow-up Audit on Term Assignments of Contractor Employees, DOE-IG-0890  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Term on Term Assignments of Contractor Employees DOE/IG-0890 July 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 2, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Follow-up Audit on Term Assignments of Contractor Employees" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy frequently assigns facility contractor personnel to the Washington, DC, area on a temporary basis when program officials consider it necessary to obtain technical expertise not available locally. Commonly referred to as term assignments, the estimated cost of all such assignments for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 was over $37 million, all of which was

252

Transmittal of Department of Energy-Chief Information Officer...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Information Officer-Enterprise Architecture Guidance More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0686 OCIO Organization Chart (printable version) US Department of Energy...

253

MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE DURING...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE DURING THE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENT'S CONSOLIDATEDFISCAL YEAR...

254

Audit Report: OAS-M-07-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy's Department of Energy's Superconductivity Partnerships OAS-M-07-01 January 2007 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 January 18, 2007 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY FROM: SIJBJ ECT: ?. ' J 1 , -i' /[ ( ''4 [l/ - 6 . Collard - ~'ksistarh lnspector General for Perfomlance Audits Office of Inspector General INFORMATION: Audit Report 011 "Management Controls over the Department of Energy's Superconductivity Partnerships" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy, through its Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, funds Superconductivity Partnerships. Each Superconductivity Partnership (Partnership) receives financial assistance primarily through a cooperative agreement

255

Office of Inspector General | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Department » Office of Inspector General Energy Department » Office of Inspector General Office of Inspector General Office of Inspector General Latest Reports January 2, 2014 Special Report: DOE/IG-0901 NNSA's Management of the $245 million Nuclear Materials Safeguards and Security Upgrades Project Phase II at Los Alamos National Laboratory December 20, 2013 Audit Report: OAS-FS-14-04 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2013 Financial Statement Audit December 12, 2013 Audit Report: OAS-FS-14-03 Department of Energy's Fiscal Year 2013 Consolidated Financial Statements December 11, 2013 Audit Report: OAS-FS-14-02 Department of Energy's Nuclear Waste Fund's Fiscal Year 2013 Financial Statement Audit More Reports > Contact the Hotline BY PHONE D.C. Metro Area: (202) 586-4073 Toll free: (800) 541-1625

256

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32 32 April 1,2009 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 1 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act FAR Cases Published as Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-032 SUMMARY: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act FAR Cases were published as Federal Acquisition Circular 32 in this morning's Federal Register. A summary is attached. The Circular also includes a case allowing GAO the right to interview current contractor employees when conducting audits. This Flash and its attachment will be posted online at the following website: httv://www.management.ener~~.gov/volicy guidance/policy flashes.htm. Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Richard Langston at

257

Audit of the DOE's Commercial Laboratory Quality Assurance Evaluation Program, IG-0374  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20, 1995 20, 1995 IG-1 INFORMATION: "Audit of the Department of Energy's Commercial Laboratory Quality Assurance Evaluation Program" The Secretary BACKGROUND: The audit was undertaken because of problems identified during prior Office of Inspector General audit work. This audit work identified problems related to quality assurance at both subcontract commercial laboratories and M&O contractor operated laboratories. DISCUSSION: The audit disclosed that contractors conducted redundant quality assurance evaluations of commercial laboratories, did not evaluate others, applied standards inconsistently, produced inconsistent results, and did not communicate those results among contractors. We found that 103 of the 206 quality

258

Audit Report: IG-0470 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 Audit Report: IG-0470 May 11, 2000 Follow-up Audit of Health Benefit Costs at the Department's Management and Operating Contractors In Calendar Year (CY) 1998, the Department of Energy (Department) spent about $480 million to provide health benefits for employees of its contractors. In 1994, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) evaluated the system in place at that time to determine if contractor employee health benefit costs were reasonable. In our June 1994 report, DOE/IG-0350, Audit of Health Benefit Costs at the Department's Management and Operating Contractors, we reported that the Department paid more than its fair share of management and operating contractors' employee health benefit costs. We recommended that the Department (1) publish quantitative measurement

259

Audit Report: IG-0412 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 Audit Report: IG-0412 October 20, 1997 Audit of the Contractor Incentive Program at the Nevada Operations Office The Department of Energy (Department) is using performance-based contracts to address problems associated with its traditional management and operating contracts. Under this approach, contractor performance is to be evaluated against performance measures which are clearly stated, results-oriented, and established prior to performance. The performance measures, which reflect the Department's expectations of the contractor, are the basis for rewarding superior contractor performance through the use of incentive fees. The purpose of our audit was to determine whether performance-based contracting, as incorporated in the Bechtel Nevada Corporation (Bechtel) contract for the management of the Department's

260

Audit Report: IG-0574 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Audit Report: IG-0574 November 14, 2002 Calutron Isotope Production Capabilities In August 2002, the Department of Energy (Department) formalized its plan to permanently disable the only domestic facility capable of producing electromagnetically enriched stable isotopes. The Department intended to dismantle the equipment in the facility, called calutrons, and rely on existing isotope inventories, isotopes produced by Russia, or the adaptation of other isotope separation technologies to meet the domestic demand for stable isotopes. This plan was based on the premise that the calutrons were excess to mission needs and not economical. Audit Report: IG-0574 More Documents & Publications Office of Inspector General Quarterly Report Audit Report: IG-0709 Semiannual Report to Congress: October 1, 2002 - March 31, 2003

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Audit Report: IG-0459 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

59 59 Audit Report: IG-0459 February 15, 2000 Unclassified Computer Network Security at Selected Field Sites Improving security for unclassified information systems is one of the top issues facing government organizations today. This issue developed as Federal agencies migrated from a closed architecture, limited-access, mainframe environment to a web-based, client/server architecture, where literally the world may access government systems. The U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) confirmed this reality in a series of reports to the Congress culminating in the designation of information system security as a "new Government-wide high-risk area." Audit Report: IG-0459 More Documents & Publications Evaluation Report: IG-0519 Audit Report: IG-0568 Evaluation Report: IG-0856

262

HOSPITAL ENERGY AUDITS: A BIBLIOGRAPHY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

J.W. "Professional Energy Audit Points Way to $100,000to) I '-.J Spielvogel (Energy Audits) W I Stein Stroeh Total1974 February; 18:57-9. "Energy Audit Procedures. Ii Federal

Pollack, R. I.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

263

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A9 Date: 09092010 Location(s): New Mexico Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office September 9, 2010 CX-003713: Categorical Exclusion...

264

Audit Report: OAS-L-10-09 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Audit Report: OAS-L-10-09 September 30, 2010 Subcontract Auditing at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore's contract incorporated Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation clauses 970.5232-3 and 970.5244-1 that required Livermore to provide for periodic post-award audits of cost-reimbursement subcontractors and subcontracts where costs incurred are a factor in determining the amount payable. To ensure the integrity and reliability of contractor cost data, the Office of Inspector General (OIG), the Office of the Chief Financial Officer, the Office of Procurement and Assistance Management, and the Contractor Internal Audit Council, developed the Cooperative Audit Strategy (Strategy). The Strategy became a contractual requirement under Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation 970.5232-3, in November 2004,

265

Audit Report: OAS-L-10-09 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OAS-L-10-09 OAS-L-10-09 Audit Report: OAS-L-10-09 September 30, 2010 Subcontract Auditing at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore's contract incorporated Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation clauses 970.5232-3 and 970.5244-1 that required Livermore to provide for periodic post-award audits of cost-reimbursement subcontractors and subcontracts where costs incurred are a factor in determining the amount payable. To ensure the integrity and reliability of contractor cost data, the Office of Inspector General (OIG), the Office of the Chief Financial Officer, the Office of Procurement and Assistance Management, and the Contractor Internal Audit Council, developed the Cooperative Audit Strategy (Strategy). The Strategy became a contractual requirement under

266

Audit Report: IG-0525 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 Audit Report: IG-0525 September 24, 2001 Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response Training and Education Center's Marketing Program The Fiscal Year (FY) 1994 National Defense Authorization Act authorized the establishment of Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response (HAMMER) Training and Education Centers at Department of Energy sites to provide training for handling hazardous materials. The legislation envisioned HAMMER training centers as user facilities for the Department, other federal agencies, and regional response personnel. The only center built to date is located at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. This center, opened in September 1997, has an average annual operating budget of $5.5 million. Audit Report: IG-0525

267

Issue Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Report on Financial Statements and Federal Single Audit Please find attached our report on the City of Issaquahs financial statements and compliance with federal laws and regulations. We are issuing this report in order to provide information on the Citys financial condition.

Brian Sonntag; City Council; City Of Issaquah; Brian Sonntag Cgfm

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

Utility Line Inspections and Audits  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Utility Line Inspections and Audits provides utility engineers with a concise reference for the pros, cons, and how to related to performing various line inspections and audits.

2007-03-21T23:59:59.000Z

269

How well do home energy audits serve the homeowner?  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

How well do home energy audits serve the homeowner? How well do home energy audits serve the homeowner? Title How well do home energy audits serve the homeowner? Publication Type Conference Proceedings LBNL Report Number LBNL-5712E Year of Publication 2012 Authors Ingle, Aaron, Mithra M. Moezzi, Loren Lutzenhiser, and Richard C. Diamond Conference Name 2012 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings Date Published 05/2012 Conference Location Pacific Grove, CA, USA Abstract Home energy audits administered by utilities and government typically provide homeowners with lists of technical upgrade recommendations intended to increase the technical energy efficiency of the house. Audits proceed with assessment of physical characteristics, subsequently processed with a computational model and transformed into a report, sometimes customized by the auditor. While the design of an energy audit reflects program and policy points of view - balancing program cost with expected program savings, educating people about the value of energy efficiency, etc. - it is crucial to consider the criteria for a good home energy audit and recommendations from homeowners' points of view. How well do home energy audits currently meet these criteria? How well do asset-based assessments match what homeowners seem to want? We consider these questions based on a study of 286 homeowners who participated in a Seattle City Light home energy audit program. Findings suggest that there is substantial opportunity to reorient audit programs to better fit the realities of why homeowners undertake energy audits and retrofits. In the Seattle City Light program, participating homeowners found certain elements of the audit they received - interaction with professional auditors, blower door testing, and customized, specific upgrade recommendations - to be more compelling than the standardized and quantitative elements. Rather than being engaged with increasing energy efficiency, as invited by an asset perspective and asset-based efficiency scores, homeowners wanted to build better understanding of their home's energy use and to learn how to solve specific problems, especially reflecting their household's actual energy use practices.

270

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant's Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant's Waste Diversion Efforts OAS-M-13-01 March 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 March 15, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, PORTSMOUTH/PADUCAH PROJECT OFFICE FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant's Waste Diversion Efforts" INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management, mandates that each Federal facility maintain a cost-effective waste prevention and recycling program. Further, Executive Order 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance, requires that Federal agencies achieve a 50 percent

271

Security auditing course development  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As people increasingly depend on computers and network systems, security auditing has become one of the most effective security practices to achieve defense-in-depth in organizations. It follows an effective process to measure policies, procedures ... Keywords: IT audit, IT education, curriculum development, security

Yin Pan

2007-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

Audit Report: IG-0487 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Audit Report: IG-0487 October 31, 2000 The Restructure of Security Services by the Oak Ridge Operations Office In Fiscal Year (FY) 1998, the Oak Ridge Operations Office (Operations Office) decided to restructure its security services in an effort to reduce cost, gain more administrative control, and to capitalize on the efficiencies associated with a centralized approach to security. This new approach was thoroughly vetted with senior Department officials at Headquarters. To achieve its objectives, in FY 2000 the Operations Office awarded a 3-year base term contract for security services valued at $218 million to Wackenhut Services, Incorporated (Wackenhut). In its analysis justifying the new approach, the Operations Office estimated that cost savings of approximately $5 million a year would result from this new

273

Eastern Audits Division  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Work Plan for FY 2014 Work Plan for FY 2014 Eastern Audits Division  Follow-up of the Reindustrialization Program at East Tennessee Technology Park  Audit of the Department's Management of High-Risk Property  Audit of the Department's Efforts to Reduce Mercury Contamination at the Y-12 National Security Complex  Non-conforming Equipment and Parts at the Savannah River Site  Audit of the Department's Facility Contractors' Use of No Bid Subcontracts  Decontamination and Decommissioning Activities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory  The Department's Audit Resolution and Follow-up Process  Legacy Management Activities at Selected Sites  Department's Contract Awards Made to Alaska Native Corporation  Readiness of the Saltstone Disposal Facility at the Savannah River Site

274

Audit Report: IG-0437 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 7 Audit Report: IG-0437 January 25, 1999 Aircraft and Air Service Management Programs The Department of Energy's (Department) Albuquerque Operations Office (Albuquerque) owns seven aircraft that support defense programs, research and development efforts, emergency response programs, and official travel of Government and contractor employees. An Office of Inspector General (OIG) report, issued in 1994, identified concerns with Albuquerque's cost for air service. Since that report, there have been reductions in cost and personnel indicating changes in air service requirements. We conducted this audit to determine (1) whether costs to operate Albuquerque's aircraft were excessive and (2) if individual aircraft in the fleet were justified. On January 7, 1999, the OIG issued a separate report on its Review of the U.S.

275

Audit Report: IG-0368 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 Audit Report: IG-0368 March 20, 1995 Audit of the Richland Operations Office Site Characterization Program In 1989 the Secretary of Energy changed the mission of the Richland Operations Office (Richland) from supporting weapons production to environmental restoration and waste management. Richland's new mission required close coordination with Federal and State Environmental Regulatory Agencies. On May 15, 1989, Richland, the Washington State Department of Ecology, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency negotiated and signed the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement). Through this agreement, Richland was required to survey Hanford for contaminants, analyze samples, and determine the most cost-effective method to clean up the waste identified. The objective of

276

Audit Report: IG-0526 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Audit Report: IG-0526 September 26, 2001 Dissemination of Research from the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory In response to a 1995 Office of Inspector General report entitled, Audit of Department of Energy's Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), Department of Energy officials stated that the laboratory would offer unique interactive and synergistic scientific exploration capabilities and would be equipped with state-of-the-art and first-of-a-kind equipment. Subsequently, the Department constructed and currently operates the EMSL in Richland, Washington. The $229 million EMSL opened in October 1997 as a National User Facility. Under contract with the Richland Operations Office (Richland), Battelle Memorial Institute (Battelle) operates the EMSL as

277

Tax Deduction for Home Energy Audits and Energy Efficiency Improvements |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tax Deduction for Home Energy Audits and Energy Efficiency Tax Deduction for Home Energy Audits and Energy Efficiency Improvements Tax Deduction for Home Energy Audits and Energy Efficiency Improvements < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Other Maximum Rebate $1,000 per return per year; $2,000 cumulatively per taxpayer Program Info Start Date 01/01/2009 State Missouri Program Type Personal Deduction Rebate Amount 100% of the cost of eligible improvements In July 2008, Missouri enacted legislation allowing homeowners to take an income tax deduction of the cost of home energy audits and associated energy efficiency improvements. The tax deduction is valid for expenses incurred on or after January 1, 2009. Any deduction shall be claimed for the tax year in which the qualified home energy audit was conducted or in

278

Office of Inspector General INTERNAL AUDIT CHARTER  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

containing a graphical user interface, through which the inspector accesses the live imagery for remote for the inspector, is time con­ suming, and suffers at times from being ineffective due to inspector fatigue or boredom. 2 Enhanced remote visual inspection could allow the inspector to safely, quickly and accurately

Richman, Fred

279

SWR-B-01-02 AUDIT REPORT PREDICTION AND MAPPING CAPABILITIES FOR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SWR-B-01-02 SWR-B-01-02 AUDIT REPORT PREDICTION AND MAPPING CAPABILITIES FOR ATMOSPHERIC RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MARCH 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 March 7, 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE FROM: Lawrence R. Ackerly, Regional Manage g e P . Western Regional Audit Office Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Prediction and Mapping Capabilities for Atmospheric Releases of Hazardous Materials" BACKGROUND Since the development of nuclear weapons, the Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessors have sought to track and mitigate the impact of any atmospheric dispersion of hazardous materials, primarily radioactive particles. Today, DOE sites generally

280

Follow-up Audit of the Department of Energy's Financial Assistance for Integrated Biorefinery Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department Department of Energy's Financial Assistance for Integrated Biorefinery Projects DOE/IG-0893 September 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 9, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Follow-up Audit of the Department of Energy's Financial Assistance for Integrated Biorefinery Projects" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Bioenergy Technologies Office (Program) supports the development of biomass resources into commercially viable biofuels, bioproducts and biopower. The Program provides financial assistance for integrated biorefinery projects to assist in building

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

AUDIT REPORT: OAS-L-03-03 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

AUDIT REPORT: OAS-L-03-03 AUDIT REPORT: OAS-L-03-03 AUDIT REPORT: OAS-L-03-03 December 3, 2002 Follow-Up Audit on the Department's Managment of Field Contractor Employees Assigned to Headquarters and Other Federal Agencies In December 1997, the Office of Inspector General issued the Audit of the Department of Energy's Management of Field Contractor Employees Assigned to Headquarters and Other Federal Agencies (DOE/IG-0414). The audit noted that the Department needed to take corrective actions to improve the controls over and properly account for field contractors assigned to Headquarters. Based on our audit recommendations, the Department issued DOE Order 350.2 to clarify and modify the policies and procedures for managing facility contractor employees assigned to Headquarters. This Order officially

282

Audit Report: OAS-FS-07-02 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

OAS-FS-07-02 OAS-FS-07-02 Audit Report: OAS-FS-07-02 November 13, 2006 Report on the Department of Energy's Fiscal Year 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheet In response to requirements established by the Government Management Reform Act of 1994, the Office of Inspector General engages the independent public accounting for of KMPG LLP to audit the Department of Energy's Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 consolidated balance sheet. The contractor was engages to audit only the balance sheet because a material weakness in financila control and reporting resulted in a disclaimer of opinion on the FY 2005 Audit of the Department's Consolidated Financial Statements. Audit Report: OAS-FS-07-02 More Documents & Publications Financial Statement: OAS-FS-07-02 Audit Report: OAS-FS-12-04 Audit Report: OAS-FS-11-04

283

4.5 Audit Requirements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Requirements Audit Requirements Audit requirements are now contained in 2 separate sub-sections. Subsection 4.5.1 contains the audit requirements for States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations while subsection 4.5.2 contains the audit requirements for For-Profit Organizations. 4.5.1 Audit Requirements for States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations (a) General. All States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations that expend over $500,000 in Federal funds in any year are required to have a single audit conducted in accordance with OMB Circular A-133. This requirement flows down to subrecipients that meet the dollar threshold. An independent auditor shall perform the audit in accordance with the Government Auditing Standards and must: 1) audit and provide opinions on the fair presentation of the

284

Audit Report: IG-0387 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Audit Report: IG-0387 March 22, 1996 Report on Audit of Architect and Engineering Costs at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Audit Report: IG-0387 More Documents &...

285

Audit Report: IG-0390 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 Audit Report: IG-0390 May 8, 1996 Department of Energy Management and Operating Contractor Available Fees Audit Report: IG-0390 More Documents & Publications Audit Report:...

286

Audit Report: IG-0404 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 Audit Report: IG-0404 May 7, 1997 Audit of Department of Energy Contractor Occupational Injury and Illness Reporting Practices Audit Report: IG-0404 More Documents & Publications...

287

Audit Report: IG-0380 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

80 Audit Report: IG-0380 October 11, 1995 Audit of the Department of Energy's Transportation Accident Resistant Container Program Audit Report: IG-0380 More Documents &...

288

Audit Report: IG-0402 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 Audit Report: IG-0402 April 1, 1997 Audit of the Management of the Department of Energy's Leased Administrative Facilities Audit Report: IG-0402 More Documents & Publications...

289

Audit Report: IG-0395 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 Audit Report: IG-0395 August 19, 1996 Audit of the Department of Energy's User Facilities Audit Report: IG-0395 More Documents & Publications Semiannual Report to Congress: April...

290

Industrial Energy Audit Guidebook: Guidelines for Conducting...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Industrial Energy Audit Guidebook: Guidelines for Conducting an Energy Audit in Industrial Facilities Jump to: navigation, search Name Industrial Energy Audit Guidebook: Guidelines...

291

Routine environmental audit of the Sandia National Laboratories, California, Livermore, California  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the results of the Routine Environmental Audit of the Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California (SNL/CA). During this audit the activities the Audit Team conducted included reviews of internal documents and reports from preview audits and assessments; interviews with US Department of Energy (DOE), State of California regulators, and contractor personnel; and inspections and observations of selected facilities and operations. The onsite portion of the audit was conducted from February 22 through March 4, 1994, by the DOE Office of Environmental Audit (EH-24), located within the Office of Environment, Safety, and Health (EH). The audit evaluated the status of programs to ensure compliance with Federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations; compliance with DOE Orders, guidance, and directives; and conformance with accepted industry practices and standards of performance. The audit also evaluated the status and adequacy of the management systems developed to address environmental requirements. The audit`s functional scope was comprehensive and included all areas of environmental management and a programmatic evaluation of NEPA and inactive waste sites.

Not Available

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

Audit of Department of Energy International Charter Flights, IG-0397 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Department of Energy International Charter Flights, of Department of Energy International Charter Flights, IG-0397 Audit of Department of Energy International Charter Flights, IG-0397 In our November 1994 report entitled, "Audit of Department of Energy International Charter Flights," we reported that the Department had not established a systematic and costeffective process to acquire international air services. We suggested that the Department establish written policy and procedures for acquiring international air service including clarification of the responsibilities for all interested parties. We stated that the written policy and procedures should clarify the responsibilities of the Office of Human Resources and Administration, Headquarters Procurement, and Office of Aviation Policy. In addition,

293

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Secure Transportation DC-9 Office of Secure Transportation DC-9 Aircraft Refurbishment DOE/IG-0815 May 2009 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 May 6, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Office of Secure Transportation DC-9 Aircraft Refurbishment" BACKGROUND The National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Office of Secure Transportation (OST) maintains a fleet of seven aircraft to transport sensitive items, equipment and security personnel. Based on increasing requirements for transporting components and security personnel, OST decided to add a heavy transport aircraft to meet the Department's weapons surety and emergency response missions. In 2004, as a

294

Audit Report: IG-0629 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 Audit Report: IG-0629 December 8, 2003 Central Office Expenses for the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility The Southeastern Universities Research Association is the Department of Energy's (Department) contractor for the operation of the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Jefferson Lab). The Jefferson Lab contract provided for reimbursement of central office expenses that are allowed by the cost principles contained in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations. In general, central office expenses are general and administrative expenses incurred by a contractor. Among other things, for a cost to be allowable it must be reasonable, allocable, conform to limitations and exclusions set forth in

295

FRA, LLC Internal Audit Charter  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

I. In I. In A. M policies a office wh Laborator FRA Aud the Board performan Prime Co B. O FRA and Practice Auditors, 1 2 3 4 5 C. A the FRA access to their miss full and p concerns nternal Aud Mission. All and controls hich reports a ry, works in dit Committe d of Directo nce of the in ontract betwe Objectives. T d Laboratory of Internal , that: . Internal a protecting . Internal ac unallowab . Operation i.e., opera . Appropria . Internal co assure effi security. Authority. Th President an all FRA per sion to the ex private acces and findings dit Charter: Fermi Resea are subject t administrativ consultation ee. This prov ors, with an nternal contro een FRA and The objective managemen Auditing an accounting c g the assets of ccounting co ble costs.

296

Fiscal Year 2011 Audit of the Work Performed Under the Work for Others Program at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report Fiscal Year 2011 Audit of the Work Performed Under the Work for Others Program at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory OAS-L-13-10 June 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 24, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, BERKLEY SITE OFFICE FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Fiscal Year 2011 Audit of the Work Performed Under the Work for Others Program at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The attached report presents the results of the audit of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's (Berkeley) Work for Others (WFO) Program. The Office of Inspector General contracted with

297

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary of Audit Report Summary of Audit Report National Nuclear Security Administration's Use of Innovative Technologies to Meet Security Requirements This document provides a summary of an Audit Report that is not publicly releasable. Public release is controlled pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act OAS-L-09-02 October 2008 The following is a summary o f a Special Access Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information Audit Report, OAS-L-09-02, dated October 31, 2008, entitled "National Nuclear Security Administration's Use o f Innovative Technologies to Meet Security Requirements. The com~lete report is not available for public disclosure. BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (Department) developed the Design Basis Threat policy (DBT), which identified the most credible threats posed by potential adversaries to Departmental assets and

298

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

d d POLICY FLASH 2010-64 DATE: TO: FROM: July 7,201 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 I Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-42 SUMMARY: Attached for your information is a summary of Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-42 which makes changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The FAC has eleven rules (seven final and four interim) and one technical amendment. Attached is a short overview of the rules to include its effective date and applicability date. To view FAC 2005-42 go to the Federal Register Browse web link at http://www.~~oaccess.~ov/fr/browse.html and search for the Federal Register Volume 75, Number 115 for Wednesday, June 16,2010.

299

Audit of Groundwater Remediation Plans at Savannah River, ER-B-96-02  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AUDIT OF GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION PLANS AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible.

300

Audit of the US Department of Energy`s consolidated financial statements for Fiscal Year 1996  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Office of Inspector General audited the Department`s Consolidated Statement of Financial position as of September 30, 1996, and the related Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Position for the year ended. Results are described.

NONE

1997-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Audit Report: ER-B-99-04 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 Audit Report: ER-B-99-04 March 15, 1999 Credit Card Usage at the Ohio Field Office and the Fernald and Miamisburg Environmental Management Projects The Department of Energy...

302

Audit Report: WR-B-00-01 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 Audit Report: WR-B-00-01 November 23, 1999 Analytical Laboratory Capabilities at the Hanford Site The Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (Richland) was...

303

Special Report on the Audit of the Management of Department of...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Projects at the Nevada Operations Office, WR-B-97-01 Audit of Construction of an Environmental, Safety, and Health Analytical Laboratory at the Pantex Plant, WR-B-96-02...

304

Audit Report: CR-B-02-02 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report: CR-B-02-02 Audit Report: CR-B-02-02 August 22, 2002 Procurement Administration at Brookhaven National Laboratory In May 1999, the Office of Inspector General evaluated...

305

Audit Report: OAS-L-08-11 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Audit Report: OAS-L-08-11 June 3, 2008 Certification and Accreditation of the Office of Science National Security Systems (Science) (OUO Not Available for Viewing) More Documents...

306

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2010 Financial Statement Audit  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN TO: IG-34 (A10FN002) SUBJECT: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2010 Financial Statement Audit Report No.: OAS-FS-11-02 TO: Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Fiscal Year 2010 balance sheet and the related statements of net cost, changes in net position, budgetary resources, and custodial activity. To fulfill the Office of Inspector General's audit responsibilities, we contracted with the independent public accounting firm of KPMG LLP (KPMG) to conduct the audit, subject to our review. KPMG is responsible for expressing an opinion on the

307

Environmental audit of the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL)  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the results of the environmental audit conducted at the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL) at the Savannah River Site (SRS), principally in Aiken and Barnwell Counties, South Carolina. The audit was conducted by the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s), Office of Environmental Audit (EH-24), beginning September 13, 1993, and ending September 23, 1993. The scope of the audit at SREL was comprehensive, addressing environmental activities in the technical areas of air; surface water/drinking water; groundwater/soil, sediment, and biota; waste management; toxic and chemical materials; inactive Waste sites; radiation; quality assurance; and environmental management. Specifically assessed was the compliance of SREL operations and activities with Federal, state, and local regulations; DOE Orders; and best management practices.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recovery and Reinvestment Act State Energy Program - Estacada School District Biomass Boilers CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08032010 Location(s): Estacada, Oregon Office(s): Energy...

309

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03172010 Location(s): Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 17, 2010 CX-001327: Categorical...

310

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for High Performance Hospitals CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 09302010 Location(s): San Francisco, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National...

311

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New Reactor Technology for Hydro processing Bio-oils to Produce Gasoline, Diesel and Jet Fuel CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 05022011 Location(s): Maryland Office(s): Energy...

312

Energy Metering Audit Procedure  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This paper describes the recent audit of the utility distribution meters in a petrochemical plant. These meters measure the steam, condensate, natural gas, water, nitrogen and air flows to the different process units within the plant. This audit started as an attempt to resolve discrepancies between the 650 PSIG steam distribution and supply meters. Theoretically the sum of the 650 PSIG steam flows to the units should have matched the total of the steam supplied to the plant. However, in this plant the monthly totals of the distribution were consistently 15% - 25% lower than the supply meter totals. The plant is billed on the basis of the supply meters. Therefore, these discrepancies represented a significant utility cost, approximately $150,000 a year, that was arbitrarily allocated among the different units. The plant commissioned an audit of the 650 PSIG distribution and supply meters. The purpose of this audit was to: 1. Certify that there were no users not monitored by the existing distribution meters. 2. Verify the operability and accuracy of the meters. Hopefully, the results of the audit would allow the plant to account for at least 90% of the steam supplied. This accounting was necessary for equitable distribution of utility costs and accurate determination of unit production costs. The project was eventually expanded to include all utility streams. The audit of the following utilities was funded and implemented due to their relatively high unit costs: 650 PSIG steam, 200 PSIG steam, natural gas, and nitrogen. The audit of the other utilities is planned but a schedule has not been established.

Whitaker, W. S.

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

Fermilab | Directorate | Internal Audit Services | Internal Audit Process  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Internal Audit Process Internal Audit Process What happens during an internal audit? Announcement Before an audit begins, we distribute an announcement letter to those who will serve as our primary audit contacts. The letter briefly outlines the preliminary audit objectives, and the general audit process. Planning Planning is the first phase of the audit. During planning, we review policies and procedures in order to gain an understanding of how work is accomplished. We typically conduct several transaction walk-throughs by tracing transactions from beginning to end. Policies, procedures, walk-throughs, and discussions with personnel enable us to identify controls and assess associated risks. The planning phase helps us fine-tune our approach and finalize our work program. It is our goal to use electronic data whenever possible. Frequently we

314

OCR Audit Program: 2012 HIPAA Privacy and Security Audits  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Background Structure Audit Subject Selection ... OCR 16 Breakdown of First 20 Auditees Level 1 Entities ... enabled clinical /business work streams ...

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

315

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

> POLICY FLASH 2010-25 DATE: TO: FROM: February 22,201 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 1.4 Establishing the Position of Source Evaluation Board (SEB) Secretariat and Knowledge Manager SUMMARY: As discussed at the December 2009 Procurement Directors' Meeting, a position titled "Source Evaluation Board (SEB) Secretariat and Knowledge Manager" has been established in the Acquisition Planning and Liaison Division, MA-621 Attached is the subject new DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 1.4 which provides guidance on the establishment of the aforementioned position and the duties and responsibilities of the position.

316

Los Alamos Lab: Ethics and Audit, EA: Homepage  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search Director's Office Ethics and Audit, EA Ethics and Audit Home ORG STRUCTURE Directorates, Divisions, Programs CONTACTS Ethics & Audit Director Terry L. Brendlinger Office Administrator Jutta Kayser (505) 665-3104 Fax: (505) 667-7340 Integrity rippling across the Laboratory YourOrgName YourOrgName Making Ethics a Best Practice Ethics is responsible for defining and developing standards of conduct for ethical business behavior, communicating those standards to employees, and monitoring compliance with the standards. The group is also responsible for reviewing and approving requests for outside employment, reviewing and advising management on conflict-of-interest issues, maintaining the Employee Concerns Program, and assisting the Investigations Workgroup to resolve employee concerns.

317

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of Non-Contaminating Cryogenic Fracturing Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12202011 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s):...

318

Audit Report: IG-0512 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Audit Report: IG-0512 July 10, 2001 Recruitment and Retention of Scientific and Technical Personnel The Department of Energy (Department), as a result of budget reduction and Government-wide downsizing goals, reduced Federal staff by about 24 percent between 1995 and 1998. This massive downsizing created mission-critical staffing needs in a number of technical areas. As of May 2001, the Department's Federal workforce consisted of about 9,900 permanent employees, including about 4,600 scientific and technical staff. In a November 2000 report, the Office of Inspector General identified Human Capital as one of the most significant challenges facing the Department. The purpose of this audit was to determine whether the Department has been able to recruit and retain scientific and technical personnel.

319

Audit Report: IG-0624 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Audit Report: IG-0624 Octover 23, 2003 Transuranic Waste Retrieval and Processing at the Hanford Site In 1996, the Department of Energy (Department) amended its Tri-Party Agreement with the Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Washington regarding cleanup of the Hanford Site. Included in the amendment was an enforceable milestone that the Department would remove about 10,000 containers of transuranic (TRU) waste from Trench 4, located in Hanford's Low-Level Burial Grounds, by the end of Fiscal Year (FY) 2004. The Richland Operations Office established a related goal to process and ship all of the site's legacy TRU waste - estimated at about 38,000 containers - to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) by 2027. Audit Report: IG-0624 More Documents & Publications

320

Audit Report: IG-0855 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IG-0855 IG-0855 Audit Report: IG-0855 September 27, 2011 Management Alert on Protective Force Training Facility Utilization at the Pantex Plant As part of an ongoing audit to determine whether the Department of Energy is effectively utilizing its protective force training facilities, we determined that the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Office of Secure Transportation (OST) plans to spend approximately $2 million for a new Physical Training/Intermediate Use of Force (PT/IUF) facility at the Pantex Plant (Pantex) near Amarillo, Texas. Our preliminary analysis suggests that the new facility may not be needed, making the $2 million expenditure unwarranted. Specifically, we noted that OST plans to construct the PT/IUF facility although Pantex has

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Audit Report: IG-0665 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 Audit Report: IG-0665 October 28, 2004 Restoration of the Monticello Mill Site at Monticello, Utah Beginning in the 1940's and continuing until the early 1960's, the Department of Energy's predecessor agencies were heavily involved in mining and milling vanadium and uranium in Monticello, Utah, for the weapons complex. Since these operations ceased, the Department's Grand Junction Projects Office has expended about $250 million to remediate and stabilise the Monticello Mill site. One of the final phases of the project was to restore the mill site. The restoration was to include placing a soil barrier to cover hot spots, grading to provide proper surface drainage and re-vegetating to minimize erosion. Audit Report: IG-0665 More Documents & Publications

322

Audit Report: IG-0855 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

55 55 Audit Report: IG-0855 September 27, 2011 Management Alert on Protective Force Training Facility Utilization at the Pantex Plant As part of an ongoing audit to determine whether the Department of Energy is effectively utilizing its protective force training facilities, we determined that the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Office of Secure Transportation (OST) plans to spend approximately $2 million for a new Physical Training/Intermediate Use of Force (PT/IUF) facility at the Pantex Plant (Pantex) near Amarillo, Texas. Our preliminary analysis suggests that the new facility may not be needed, making the $2 million expenditure unwarranted. Specifically, we noted that OST plans to construct the PT/IUF facility although Pantex has existing facilities that have the capability and capacity to fulfill OST's

323

Audit Report: IG-0839 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Audit Report: IG-0839 September 20, 2010 Environment and Worker Safety Control Systems at the National Nuclear Security Administration's Kansas City Plant The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration's Kansas City Plant is located within the Bannister Federal Complex in Kansas City, Missouri, which also houses the General Services Administration and other agencies. Current and former employees and families of former employees of the Bannister Complex have recently raised concerns about serious illnesses, in some cases leading to death, resulting from exposure to toxins at the Complex. Due to the seriousness of the health issues that were raised, the Office of Inspector General initiated an audit to determine whether the Kansas City Plant had controls in place to protect

324

Audit Report: IG-0624 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

24 24 Audit Report: IG-0624 Octover 23, 2003 Transuranic Waste Retrieval and Processing at the Hanford Site In 1996, the Department of Energy (Department) amended its Tri-Party Agreement with the Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Washington regarding cleanup of the Hanford Site. Included in the amendment was an enforceable milestone that the Department would remove about 10,000 containers of transuranic (TRU) waste from Trench 4, located in Hanford's Low-Level Burial Grounds, by the end of Fiscal Year (FY) 2004. The Richland Operations Office established a related goal to process and ship all of the site's legacy TRU waste - estimated at about 38,000 containers - to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) by 2027. Audit Report: IG-0624 More Documents & Publications

325

Southwestern Federal Power System's Fiscal Year 2010 Financial Statement Audit, OAS-FS-12-10  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 Financial 10 Financial Statement Audit OAS-FS-12-10 July 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 30, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION FROM: Daniel M. Weeber Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Administration Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Southwestern Federal Power System's Fiscal Year 2010 Financial Statement Audit The attached report present the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Southwestern Federal Power System's (SWFPS) combined balance sheets, as of September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related combined statements of revenues and expenses, changes in net Federal investment and cash flows. To fulfill the Office of Inspector General's (OIG) audit responsibilities, we contracted with the

326

Audit Report: ER-B-98-01 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8-01 8-01 Audit Report: ER-B-98-01 October 23, 1997 Audit of the Deactivation, Decontamination, and Disposal of Surplus Facilities at the Savannah River Site Westinghouse Savannah River Company (Westinghouse) is responsible for managing the Department of Energy's (Department) surplus facilities at the Savannah River Site (Site). In Fiscal Year (FY) 1996, the Site had 162 surplus facilities and anticipated that 118 more would become surplus within the next 5 years. The objective of this audit was to determine whether the Savannah River Operations Office (Operations Office) and Westinghouse had economically and promptly deactivated, decontaminated, and disposed of surplus facilities at the Site. Audit Report: ER-B-98-01 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0684

327

Audit Report: OAS-FS-12-07 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 7 Audit Report: OAS-FS-12-07 March 15, 2012 Performance Audit of the Department of Energy's Improper Payment Reporting in the Fiscal Year 2011 Agency Financial Report To fulfill the Office of Inspector General's Audit Responsibilities we contracted with the independent public accounting firm of KPMG, LLP to express an opinion on whether the Department of Energy (Department) met the Office of Management and Budget's criteria for compliance with the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act (IPERA). The objective of this audit was to complete an evaluation of the accuracy and completeness of agency reporting, and evaluate agency performance in reducing and recapturing improper payments under IPERA. This audit found that the Department did not comply with the requirements of IPERA pertaining to site

328

Audit Report: OAS-FS-14-01 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4-01 4-01 Audit Report: OAS-FS-14-01 November 25, 2013 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2013 Financial Statement Audit The Office of Inspector General contracted with the independent public accounting firm of KPMG, LLP (KPMG) to conduct the audit, subject to our review. KPMG is responsible for expressing an opinion on the Commission's financial statements and reporting on applicable internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations. The Office of Inspector General monitored audit progress and reviewed the audit report and related documentation. KPMG concluded that the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Commission as of and for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and its net costs, changes in

329

Increasing Federal Office Building Water Efficiency, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) (Fact Sheet)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Quick guide to increasing Federal office building water efficiency, water management planning, performing a water audit, calculating a water balance, and best management practices.

Not Available

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Audits that Make a Difference  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper presents guidance on how to perform internal audits that get management's attention and result in effective corrective action. It assumes that the reader is already familiar with the basic constructs of auditing and knows how to perform them. Instead, it focuses on additional techniques that have proven to be effective in our internal auditing program. Examples using a theoretical audit of a calibration program are included.

Malsbury, Judith

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Audit Report: OAS-FS-10-02 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Audit Report: OAS-FS-10-02 November 12, 2009 Report on "The Department of Energy's FiscalYear 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements" This is to inform you that the Department of Energy's (Department) Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 have received an unqualified opinion. Pursuant to requirements established by the Government Management Reform Act of 1994, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) engaged the independent public accounting firm of KPMG LLP (KPMG) to perform an audit of the Department's FY 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements. The audit was performed in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in the Government Auditing

332

Audit Report: OAS-L-07-16  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit of Contract Transition Audit of Contract Transition Activities at Los Alamos National Laboratory OAS-L-07-16 August 2007 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE: August 7, 2007 Audit Report No: OAS-L-07- I6 REPLY TO ATTN OF: I(;-32 (AObLA046) SUBJECT: Report on "Audit of Contract Transition Activities at Los Alanios National Laboratory" TO: Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs, Natiolial Nuclear Security Administration INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTlV' Los Alanios National Laboratory (Los Alanios) is a federally-funded facility located in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Los Alanios' mission is to strengthen the nation's security, enhance tlie nation's defense, and reduce global terrorism threats related to weapons of mass destruction. The University of California was the sole

333

Follow-up Audit of the Department's Cyber Security Incident Management Program, IG-0878  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department's Department's Cyber Security Incident Management Program DOE/IG-0878 December 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits & Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 11, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Follow-up Audit of the Department's Cyber Security Incident Management Program" INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy operates numerous networks and systems to help accomplish its strategic missions in the areas of energy, defense, science and the environment. The systems are frequently subjected to sophisticated cyber attacks that could impact the Department's

334

Residential Energy Audits  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A series of events coupled with the last five years experience performing Residential Conservation Service (RCS) audits have resulted in renewed efforts by utilities to evaluate the role of residential energy audits. There are utilities where the RCS program is considered very successful; however, the majority of utilities have found that the costs far exceed the benefits. Typically, the response rates are low (less than 1% per year for Texas utilities), the audits primarily reach upper income persons, and consumers only implement the low-cost recommendations. The Texas PUC is on record as being opposed to the RCS as well as the Commercial and Apartment Conservation Service (CACS) and now requires Energy Efficiency Plans with detailed cost and savings information on utility end user programs.

Brown, W.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

Audit Report: IG-0739 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

739 739 Audit Report: IG-0739 September 20, 2006 Performance-Based Contract Incentives at the Hanford Site In 2002. the Office of Environmental Management (EM) directed its field organization LO ensure thar the structure of environmental remediation contracts emphasized he completior~o f specific tasks. Many of these tasks were acknowledged to be a,,~ oressive and technologically challenging. As part of this initiative, EM'S field activities at the Hanford Washington site, the Richland Operations Office (Richland) and the Office of River Protection (ORP), incorporated results-oriented work scopes in the~cro ntracts and increased the potential fees that the contractors could earn for completing especially challenging work. Richland, for example, accelerated work on at least ten majrjor projects. It also increased the

336

Audit Report: IG-0739 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Audit Report: IG-0739 September 20, 2006 Performance-Based Contract Incentives at the Hanford Site In 2002. the Office of Environmental Management (EM) directed its field organization LO ensure thar the structure of environmental remediation contracts emphasized he completior~o f specific tasks. Many of these tasks were acknowledged to be a,,~ oressive and technologically challenging. As part of this initiative, EM'S field activities at the Hanford Washington site, the Richland Operations Office (Richland) and the Office of River Protection (ORP), incorporated results-oriented work scopes in the~cro ntracts and increased the potential fees that the contractors could earn for completing especially challenging work. Richland, for example, accelerated work on at least ten majrjor projects. It also increased the

337

Audit Report: OAS-M-11-02 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Audit Report: OAS-M-11-02 March 22, 2011 Solar Technology Pathway Partnerships Cooperative Agreements The Department of Energy's (Department) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy established the Solar Technology Pathway Partnerships (Solar TPP) program as part of an effort to make solar energy cost-competitive with conventional forms of electricity by 2015. The program focused on new solar energy photovoltaic systems. To implement the program, the Department, beginning in 2007, established cooperative agreements with 12 for-profit financial assistance recipients who in turn established partnerships with universities, non-profit organizations, and the Department's national laboratories. To date, cooperative agreements with 9 of the 12 original recipients remain active. Of the three

338

MEMORANDUfl DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATE DATE cl e-w --we-- SUBJECT: __------------------------ _ OWNER (S) -----w-e Pamt a __---------------------- current: -------------------_______ Owner contacted 0 yes 0 no; if yes, date contacted --------w-w-- TYPE OF OPERATION ------------- erearch & Development a Facility Typr Praduction scale trstinq Pilot Scale Bench Seal e Process Theoretical Studies Sample & Analysis n Production 0 Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRACT ---------------- 0 Prim* 7z Subcontract& Purchase Order . Mmuf l cturing University Research Organization Government Sponsored Facility Rther ----B.-------------- 0 Othrr information (i.e., cost + fixrd fee, unit prier, time 81 material, rte) -m-M--- -------------------------- ---------------------------- Contract/Purchase Order M

339

MEMORANDUM DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATE DATE :;++, -m--s B-w- -w---m-- SUBJECT: , ::;:: JLLiucd ALTERN&TE e---e---- --------------------------- CITY&da NCIME: ---------------------- - --------------------- J&f STATE: OWNER ( S 1 -----m-e Past 0 Current: ------------------------ Owner contacted 0 -------------------------- 0 yes no; if ye=, date contacted ------w---s-- TYPE OF OPERATION ----w------------ F Research & Development 0 Facility Type 0 Production scale testing F Pilot Scale 0 Manufacturing 0 Bench Scale Process 0 University Research 0 Theoretical 0 Organization Studies 0 Sample & Analysis 0 Government Sponsored Facility 0 Other --------------------- 0 Production 0 Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRfiCT a--------------- 0 Prim- 0 Subcontract& s Purchase Order

340

FROM: DATE: TO:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE: DATE: TO: POLICY FLASH 2010-48 May 06,20 1 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 1 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition LetterIFinancial Assistance Letter (ALIFAL) 201 0-06, Acquiring Information Technology, Requirement to Comply With Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) SUMMARY: ALIFAL 201 0-06 provides notice that the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council are issuing a final rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to require that Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) compliant products be included in all new information technology (IT) acquisitions using Internet Protocol (IP). ALIFAL 2010-06, accordingly, updates the IPv6 guidance provided in AL-2006-04.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

HIPAA 2013 - 2012 Audits of Covered Entity Compliance with ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Accepted Government Auditing Standards (The Yellow Book) ... audit criteria ... 5 Page 6. Who Can Be Audited? Any Covered Entity ...

2013-05-20T23:59:59.000Z

342

J DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ICY FLASH 2010-5- - ICY FLASH 2010-5- - J DATE: TO: FROM: June 10,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 13 Policy and Operating Procedures for Use of the GSA Smartpay2 Purchase Card SUMMARY: Attached for your information is an updated and revised copy of DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 13, Purchase Card Policy and Operating Procedures. This Flash and its attachment will be posted online, at the following website: http:llwww.mananement.enerliy.gov/~olicy guidance/policy flashes.htm. Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Denise Clarke at (202) 287-1 748 or DeniseT.Clarke@,hq.doe.~ov . Director Office of Procurement and

343

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-7' -7' August 20,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Class Deviation by General Services Administration (GSA) to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 51.1, Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources, for Time and Material or Labor Hour Procurements SUMMARY: The attached GSA class deviation to FAR Part 51, Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources, dated October 8,2009, permits contracting officers to authorize all GSA contractors, who are performing an order on a time and material (T&M) or labor-hour (LH) basis, to purchase supplies and service from other schedule contractors or process requisitions through the GSA Supply Program. This deviation is effective for five years to October 7,2014,

344

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1,2008 1 1,2008 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBTECT: Past Performance Data SIJMMARY: Beginning October 01,2008, all contractor past performance data shall be submitted through the Department of Defense (DoD) Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) at htt~://www.c~ars.csd.disa.mil/cr>arsmain.htm. Thus, the Department will no longer use the National Institute of Health (NIH) Contractor Performance System (CPS). To ensure all Contracting Officers understand how to use this new system, Web Cast Training has been scheduled for the following dates and times: October 8- 1:30-430 including construction and A/E training during the last hour November 6- 1:30-4:30 including construction and A/E training during the last hour

345

Energy Audits in Process Units  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Emphasis is placed on practical considerations in the effective organization and execution of a successful in-house energy audit of a process unit, based upon experience gained in several such audits of Gulf Coast petrochemical units. Staffing requirements, membership qualifications, probable time span for the audit, cost-benefit ratios, and necessary line management commitment are discussed. The scope and importance of pre-audit preparation and related responsibilities are explained. Activities of the Audit Team are likely to fall naturally into six general phases, each of which is reviewed in detail.

Corwin, J. D.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

Audit Report: IG-0468 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 Audit Report: IG-0468 April 26, 2000 Facilities Information Management System In July 1995, the Department of Energy implemented a $2 million corporate database which was to contain up-to-date, reliable and comprehensive real property information. The specific intent was to provide the Department's decisionmakers at Headquarters and in the field with the data needed to make informed judgments regarding the management of the Department's real property inventory. At the time of our audit, the database, the Facilities Information Management System (FIMS), included over 100 million gross square feet of building space, 2 million acres of land, $7 billion worth of other structures and facilities, and $900 million of deferred maintenance items. With its multi-billion dollar inventory of real property at sites

347

Audit Report: IG-0709 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Audit Report: IG-0709 November 17, 2005 Management of the Department's Isotope Program Dating back to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, the Development Isotopes Department of Energy's (Department) predecessor agency, the Atomic Energy Commission, was authorized to distribute stable and radioactive isotopes at no charge to assist and encourage research on peaceful uses of isotopes involving medical therapy. More recently, the 1990 Energy and Water Appropriations Act consolidated all isotope production and distribution activities under one Department Program and established a revolving fund for the Isotope Program. Congress authorized this fund to, among other things, produce isotopes for use in research and development (R&D). Audit Report: IG-0709 More Documents & Publications

348

Audit Costs for the 1986 Texas Energy Cost Containment Program  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Direct program costs for detailed audits of 13.5 million square feet of institutional building space in the 1986 Texas Energy Cost Containment Program were $0.047/SF. The building area was 63 percent simple (offices, schools, and universities) and 37 percent complex (medical buildings and power plants). Allowing for the influence of one large facility which received less-extensive treatment due to previous work, thorough audits were obtained for an average cost of $0.050/SF. Large medical buildings (greater than about 170,000 square feet) were audited for $0.050/SF or less, and program costs for survey audits of 17.2 million square feet were $0.0028/SF. The effect on audit costs of complexity of recommended modifications, amount of savings determined, amount of implementation costs, building size, and building complexity are discussed. Primary effects on audit costs are size and complexity of buildings. Program guidelines limited consideration of projects with greater than a four year payback.

Heffington, W. M.; Lum, S. K.; Bauer, V. A.; Turner, W. D.

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

Office of Inspector General report on audit of Southwestern Federal Power System combined financial statements and supplemental schedules (with independent auditors` reports thereon) for the years ended September 30, 1997 and 1996  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Southwestern Federal Power System (SWFPS) encompasses the operation of 24 hydroelectric power plants by the US Army Corps of Engineers and the marketing of power and energy from those plants by the Southwestern Power Administration (Southwestern) of the US Department of Energy. This report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants` audit of the SWFPS`s combined power system statements of assets, Federal investments and liabilities, and the related combined statements of revenues, expenses and accumulated net revenues, and cash flows.

NONE

1998-10-06T23:59:59.000Z

350

Energy Audits | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Audits Energy Audits Energy Audits September 9, 2008 - 11:30am Addthis John Lippert What does this mean for me? Energy audits can help you determine whether your home wastes energy, and pinpoint where energy is lost -- so you can evaluate what measures you can take to make your home more energy efficient. Autumn officially begins soon, and with it comes cooler weather and fewer hours of daylight. Fall is a great time to start thinking of a home energy audit so that you can prepare your home for winter, saving energy and money in the process. The main purpose of an energy audit is to determine whether your home wastes energy, and to pinpoint where energy is being lost so you can evaluate what measures you can take to make your home more energy efficient. Audits also determine the efficiency of your home's heating

351

Energy Audits | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Audits Energy Audits Energy Audits September 9, 2008 - 11:30am Addthis John Lippert What does this mean for me? Energy audits can help you determine whether your home wastes energy, and pinpoint where energy is lost -- so you can evaluate what measures you can take to make your home more energy efficient. Autumn officially begins soon, and with it comes cooler weather and fewer hours of daylight. Fall is a great time to start thinking of a home energy audit so that you can prepare your home for winter, saving energy and money in the process. The main purpose of an energy audit is to determine whether your home wastes energy, and to pinpoint where energy is being lost so you can evaluate what measures you can take to make your home more energy efficient. Audits also determine the efficiency of your home's heating

352

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04192011 Location(s): Sarasota, Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 19,...

353

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Electricity Delivery...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Planning and Priorities CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 04222010 Location(s): Denver, Colorado Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy...

354

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Golden Field Office | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX-003201: Categorical Exclusion Determination Baseload Nitrate Salt Central Receiver Power Plant Design CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08042010 Location(s): Colorado Office(s):...

355

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A7 Date: 10052011 Location(s): West Jordan, Utah Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology...

356

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applied: A9, A11 Date: 05132010 Location(s): Lone Pine, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy May 13, 2010 CX-002320: Categorical Exclusion...

357

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

B5.1 Date: 11012010 Location(s): Mobile, Alabama Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy November 1, 2010 CX-004316: Categorical Exclusion Determination Commercial...

358

Audit of the Department of Energy's Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Year 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit of Audit of the Department of Energy's Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Year 2011 OAS-FS-12-05 February 2012 i MANAGEMENT LETTER January 26, 2012 Mr. Gregory Friedman Inspector General U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 5D-039 Washington, DC 20585 Dear Mr. Friedman: We have audited the consolidated financial statements of the United States Department of Energy (Department or DOE) as of and for the year ended September 30, 2011, and have issued our report thereon dated November 14, 2011. In planning and performing our audit of the consolidated financial statements, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in

359

Audit Report: IG-0763 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Audit Report: IG-0763 March 30, 2007 The Department's Efforts to Implement Common Information Technology Services at Headquarters The Department of Energy invested more than $980 million on consolidated infrastructure, office automation, and telecommunications in Fiscal Year (FY) 2006. In an effort to increase efficiency and purchasing power and reduce overall expenditures, the Department launched an initiative in FY 2003 to consolidate all aspects of common information technology (IT) systems including: computer desktop support, application hosting, and equipment distribution services that had previously been managed separately by various Headquarters organizations. The initiative, originally known as the Extended Common Integrated Technology Environment, is now known as the

360

Audit Report: IG-0736 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Audit Report: IG-0736 August 16, 2006 The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management's Corrective Action Program Under the Department of Energy's (Department's) Corrective Action Program (CAP), the Yucca Mountain Project staff was instructed to report potential conditions adverse to quality (hereafter referred to as conditions) or safety into the Program database. Potential conditions include all failures, deficiencies, defective items, safety issues, and nonconformances with Quality Assurance requirements, which could affect the quality of the supporting technical information. As an alternative, employees who wish their identity to remain confidential can report potential conditions through the Employee Concerns Program (ECP). However, all conditions

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Audit Report: IG-0509 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Audit Report: IG-0509 June 28, 2001 Report on the Integrated Planning, Accountability, and Budgeting System - Information System The Department of Energy (Department) is responsible for the world's largest environmental remediation program resulting from the legacy of this Nation's nuclear weapons program and government-sponsored nuclear energy research activities. About $6 billion, or one-third of the Department's annual budget, is devoted to this critical mission component. To support its mission, the Department's Office of Environmental Management (EM) developed a corporate-level project management system known as the Integrated Planning, Accountability, and Budgeting System - Information System (IPABS-IS). This system, coupled with the EM Corporate Database, was

362

Audit Report: IG-0814 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Audit Report: IG-0814 April 23, 2009 The Procurement of Safety Class/Safety-Significant Items at the Savannah River Site The Department of Energy operates several nuclear facilities at its Savannah River Site, and several additional facilities are under construction. This includes the National Nuclear Security Administration's Tritium Extraction Facility (TEF) which is designated to help maintain the reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. The Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility (MOX Facility) is being constructed to manufacture commercial nuclear reactor fuel assemblies from weapon-grade plutonium oxide and depleted uranium. The Interim Salt Processing (ISP) project, managed by the Office of Environmental Management, will treat radioactive waste.

363

Audit Report: IG-0537 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Audit Report: IG-0537 December 21, 2001 Telecommunications Infrastructure The Department of Energy has developed an extensive telecommunications infrastructure to support its diverse mission responsibilities. Currently, the Department spends more than $26 million annually to support the telecommunications component of its information technology infrastructure. Approximately $15 million is used to maintain and operate Departmentwide mission- and business-related networks, including classified and emergency communications. The Department also spends over $11 million annually on long distance telephone, Internet, and video teleconferencing services. The Department's Chief Information Officer is responsible for developing policy governing the telecommunications infrastructure.

364

Audit Report: IG-0841 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Audit Report: IG-0841 September 30, 2010 The Department's Information Technology Capital Planning and Investment Control Activities The Department of Energy spends approximately $2.2 billion annually on information technology (IT) resources to help accomplish its science, security, energy supply and environmental mission objectives. The Department's capital planning and investment control (CPIC) process is an essential tool for managing IT investments. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requires that agencies implement a well-managed CPIC process to enhance the ability to properly set spending priorities, control investments and evaluate the success of those investments once completed. As part of its current focus on eliminating under-performing investments,

365

SIGNATURE OF THIS MEMORAND TES A RECORD OF THIS DECISION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEMORAND MEMORAND TES A RECORD OF THIS DECISION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature: EPA Compliance Officer Date: (93 Page 1 of 2 INIC*EF2a U.S. DEPARTI\ LENT OF ENERGY F.ERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DETERI\ 11-NATION RECIPIENT:Tennessee Tech University STATE: TN PROJECT TITLE : Recovery Act: Multi-level Energy Storage and Controls for Large-scale Wind Energy Integration Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-PS36-09G099009 DE-EE0001 383 GF0-10-010 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including

366

DATE: TO:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, , ' > POLICY FLASH 2010-47 May 6,2010 Procurement Directors FROM: Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Letter/ Financial Assistance Letter (AL/FAL 2010-05) - Contract Periods of Performance Exceeding 5 Years SUMMARY: AL/FAL 2010-05 provides guidance and instructions with respect to the Department of Energy's processes and procedures for approving contract periods of performance in excess of five years under the requirements of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 17.204(e). This FAR permissive authority is intended to allow agencies the flexibility, consistent with fiscal law, labor law, and other restrictions, to address the requirements of an instant acquisition and seek approval to extend the contract period of performance beyond 5 years as

367

Routine environmental audit of the Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the results of the routine environmental audit of the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant (Y-12 Plant), Anderson County, Tennessee. During this audit, the activities conducted by the audit team included reviews of internal documents and reports from previous audits and assessments; interviews with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), State of Tennessee regulatory, and contractor personnel; and inspections and observations of selected facilities and operations. The onsite portion of the audit was conducted August 22-September 2, 1994, by the DOE Office of Environmental Audit (EH-24), located within the Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH). DOE 5482.1 B, {open_quotes}Environment, Safety, and Health Appraisal Program,{close_quotes} establishes the mission of EH-24 to provide comprehensive, independent oversight of DOE environmental programs on behalf of the Secretary of Energy. The ultimate goal of EH-24 is enhancement of environmental protection and minimization of risk to public health and the environment. EH-24 accomplishes its mission by conducting systematic and periodic evaluations of DOE`s environmental programs within line organizations, and by using supplemental activities that strengthen self-assessment and oversight functions within program, field, and contractor organizations. The audit evaluated the status of programs to ensure compliance with Federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations; compliance with DOE Orders, guidance, and directives; and conformance with accepted industry practices and standards of performance. The audit also evaluated the status and adequacy of the management systems developed to address environmental requirements.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

WHAT'S NEW FOR CONTRACTING OFFICERS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

GUIDE ___________________________________________________________CHAPTER 42.101 GUIDE ___________________________________________________________CHAPTER 42.101 WHAT'S NEW FOR CONTRACTING OFFICERS The Contracting Officer must obtain a waiver from the Procurement Director before electing to forgo obtaining any audit services for each proposal considered for award in a competition for a cost-reimbursement contract expected to exceed $1,000,000. The waiver request must document explicitly how the Contracting Officer plans to perform cost realism analysis without audit support. A waiver from the Procurement Director is not required for a competition for a cost-reimbursement contract not expected to exceed $1,000,000, but the Contracting Officer must document the contract file to explain explicitly how he or she plans to perform cost

369

Facility Owner Contractor Award Date End Date Options/Award Term  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OptionsAward Term Ultimate Potential Expiration Date Contract FY Competed Parent Companies LLC Partners DOE Site Procurement Director DOE Contracting Officer SLAC National...

370

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report Audit Report Progress in Implementing the Advanced Batteries and Hybrid Components Program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act OAS-RA-L-10-04 April 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (4/93) United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE: April 27, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-10-04 REPLY TO ATTN TO: IG-32 (A10RA025) SUBJECT: Report on "Progress in Implementing the Advanced Batteries and Hybrid Components Program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act" TO: Deputy Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) was enacted to

371

MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT, BUDGET AND EVALUATION/CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 5, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT, BUDGET AND EVALUATION/CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER FROM: William S. Maharay Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act Audit Report Audit Report Audit Report No.: OAS-L-04-06 We reviewed selected aspects of the Department of Energy's implementation of the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA) of 1982. The objective of FMFIA, and the Department's Management Control Program, is to ensure that controls are working effectively and that program and administrative functions are performed in an economic and efficient manner consistent with applicable laws. During the past year, the Department has undertaken an aggressive campaign to mitigate issues

372

MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT, BUDGET EV LUATION/CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ES January 10, 2003 ES January 10, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT, BUDGET EV LUATION/CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER FROM: / J ti .Maharay FR Assistant Inspector General for Audit Services S Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act Audit Report Audit Report No.: OAS-L-03-05 We reviewed selected aspects of the Department of Energy's implementation of the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA) of 1982. The objective of the FMFIA, and the Department's Management Control Program, is to ensure that controls are working effectively and that programs and administrative functions are performed in an economic and efficient manner consistent with applicable laws. In addition to our audit work in this area, we also recently issued our annual report on

373

Audit Report - Management Letter on the Audit of the Department of Energy's Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Year 2012, OAS-FS-13-08  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit of Audit of the Department of Energy's Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Year 2012 OAS-FS-13-08 January 2013 i MANAGEMENT LETTER December 17, 2012 Mr. Gregory Friedman Inspector General U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 5D-039 Washington, DC 20585 Dear Mr. Friedman: We have audited the consolidated financial statements and special-purpose financial statements of the United States Department of Energy (Department or DOE) as of and for the year ended September 30, 2012, and have issued our reports thereon dated November 14, 2012. In planning and performing our audit of the consolidated financial statements and special-purpose financial statements, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to

374

Audit Report: ER-B-98-07 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ER-B-98-07 ER-B-98-07 Audit Report: ER-B-98-07 April 6, 1998 Personal Property at the Oak Ridge Operations Office and the Office of Scientific and Technical Information The Oak Ridge Operations Office (Operations Office) and the Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) are responsible for safeguarding and controlling personal property in their possession and in the possession of their contractors. Categories of personal property include vehicles, heavy mobile equipment, computers and software, office furniture and equipment, laboratory equipment, security and protection equipment, and shop equipment. The objective of this audit was to determine whether the Operations Office and OSTI adequately safeguarded and properly accounted for personal property in their possession and in the possession

375

Audit Report: ER-B-98-07 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 7 Audit Report: ER-B-98-07 April 6, 1998 Personal Property at the Oak Ridge Operations Office and the Office of Scientific and Technical Information The Oak Ridge Operations Office (Operations Office) and the Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) are responsible for safeguarding and controlling personal property in their possession and in the possession of their contractors. Categories of personal property include vehicles, heavy mobile equipment, computers and software, office furniture and equipment, laboratory equipment, security and protection equipment, and shop equipment. The objective of this audit was to determine whether the Operations Office and OSTI adequately safeguarded and properly accounted for personal property in their possession and in the possession

376

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services Audit Report The Department of Energy's Implementation of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program under the Recovery and Reinvestment Act: A Status Report OAS-RA-10-16 August 2010 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 11, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: The Department of Energy's Implementation of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: A Status Report BACKGROUND The purpose of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) was to stimulate the U.S. economy, create or save jobs and invest in the Nation's energy future. The

377

Energy Audit Equipment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The tools (equipment) needed to perform an energy audit include those items which assist the auditor in measuring the energy used by equipment or lost in inefficiency. Each tool is designed for a specific measurement. They can be inexpensive simple tools or expensive technically complex or multifunctional tools. In general, tools are needed which measure light, temperature and humidity, electricity, air flow, heat loss, and general energy information.

Phillips, J.

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

378

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2011 0, 2011 CX-006072: Categorical Exclusion Determination Disconnection of Utilities CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 06/20/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 20, 2011 CX-006071: Categorical Exclusion Determination Relocation and Operation of Machinery and Equipment CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 06/20/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 20, 2011 CX-006068: Categorical Exclusion Determination Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/20/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 17, 2011 CX-006093: Categorical Exclusion Determination Missouri Independent Energy Efficiency Program: Onesteel Grinding Systems -

379

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-006067: Categorical Exclusion Determination Indoor Bench-Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006065: Categorical Exclusion Determination Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office

380

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-006069: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006067: Categorical Exclusion Determination Indoor Bench-Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Audit Report: IG-0653 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

53 53 Audit Report: IG-0653 June 30, 2004 Management of Oak Ridge Radio Transition Projects Department of Energy sites rely heavily on radio communications to support or facilitate activities such as site emergency response, maintenance, physical security, and protections. The Oark Ridge Reservation, which consists of the Oak Ridge Operations Office, Oake Ridge National Laboratory, East Tennessee Technology Park, and the Y-12 National Security Complex, is dependent on radio communications to link these co-located but separately managed organizations. The Manager of the Oak Ridge Operations Office has been designated the lead Federal manager for radio communications on the Reservation and provides general direction regarding system plans, certification requests, and frequency authorizations for a

382

Audit Report: IG-0815 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Audit Report: IG-0815 May 6, 2009 Office of Secure Transportation DC-9 Aircraft Refurbishment The National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Office of Secure Transportation (OST) maintains a fleet of seven aircraft to transport sensitive items, equipment and security personnel. Based on increasing requirements for transporting components and security personnel, OST decided to add a heavy transport aircraft to meet the Department's weapons surety and emergency response missions. In 2004, as a replacement following the sale of a portion of its fleet, OST acquired a DC-9 cargo aircraft that had been excessed by the U.S. military. Prior to integrating the DC-9 into its fleet, NNSA ordered a refurbishment of the aircraft. This refurbishment project was to permit the aircraft to be certified to civil air standards

383

Audit Report: IG-0450 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 Audit Report: IG-0450 July 26, 1999 The U.S. Department of Energy's Non-Nuclear Materials Inventory at the Kansas City Plant The Department of Energy (Department) maintains the majority of non-nuclear components of nuclear weapons at its Kansas City Plant. Allied Signal Federal Manufacturing and Technologies (Allied Signal) manages and operates the plant, while the Albuquerque Operations Office and its Kansas City Area Office are responsible for administering the contract with Allied Signal. In recent years, the United States has significantly reduced the number of weapons maintained in the stockpile. As a result, a large quantity of non-nuclear materials accumulated at the Kansas City Plant. The value of the inventory, as of October 1998, was $575 million. The objective of this

384

Audit Report: IG-0690 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Audit Report: IG-0690 May 20, 2005 Contractor Post-Retirement Health Benefits at the Oak Ridge Reservation The Department of Energy (Department), including the National Requirements Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), was inconsistent in its reimbursement for contractor post-retirement health benefit costs. Further, as a result of these inconsistencies, contractors were reimbursed for unreasonable costs. Specifically, while NNSA reimbursed BWXT Y-12, LLC (BWXT Y-12) for the post-retirement health benefits of corporate transferees, the Oak Ridge Operations Office (Operations Office) disallowed similar costs from the Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC (Bechtel Jacobs) contract for the East Tennessee Technology Park and denied a request from UT-Battelle, LLC (UT-Battelle), to provide similar benefits for the

385

Audit Report: IG-0653 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Audit Report: IG-0653 June 30, 2004 Management of Oak Ridge Radio Transition Projects Department of Energy sites rely heavily on radio communications to support or facilitate activities such as site emergency response, maintenance, physical security, and protections. The Oark Ridge Reservation, which consists of the Oak Ridge Operations Office, Oake Ridge National Laboratory, East Tennessee Technology Park, and the Y-12 National Security Complex, is dependent on radio communications to link these co-located but separately managed organizations. The Manager of the Oak Ridge Operations Office has been designated the lead Federal manager for radio communications on the Reservation and provides general direction regarding system plans, certification requests, and frequency authorizations for a

386

Audit of Consultant Agreements at Los Alamos National Laboratory, WR-B-96-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF CONSULTANT AGREEMENTS AT LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through

387

Special Report on the Audit of the Management of Department of Energy Construction Projects, IG-0398  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL SPECIAL REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF THE MANAGEMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after

388

Audit of the Department of Energy's Contractor Liability Insurance Costs, IG-0396  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S CONTRACTOR LIABILITY INSURANCE COSTS The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses:

389

Audit of Department of Energy's Contractor Salary Increase Funds, CR-B-97-02  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S CONTRACTOR SALARY INCREASE FUND The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses:

390

Monthly Highlights from Rutgers New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station April 2009 Sustainable Greenhouse Practices begin with Energy Audits  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

& Graphics ·State Property Accounting ·Facility Audits ·MailTech ·Business Office ·Central Warehouse · Strategic Planning · Capital Planning · Emergency Planning · Information Systems · Utility Budgets · Energy

Goodman, Robert M.

391

Audit Report: IG-0403 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Audit Report: IG-0403 May 2, 1997 Audit of the Use of Intra-Departmental Requisitions Audit Report: IG-0403 More Documents & Publications Semiannual Report to Congress: April 1 -...

392

Audit Report: IG-0394 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 Audit Report: IG-0394 August 19, 1996 Special Audit of Pension Plans for Department of Energy Contract Employees of the University of California Audit Report: IG-0394 More...

393

Audit Report: IG-0399 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 Audit Report: IG-0399 January 8, 1997 Audit of the U.S. Department of Energy's Identification and Disposal of Nonessential Land Audit Report: IG-0399 More Documents &...

394

Plant energy auditing | ENERGY STAR  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

track, and benchmark Improve energy performance ENERGY STAR industrial partnership Energy guides Energy efficiency and air regulation Plant energy auditing Industrial...

395

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Databases  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Office Databases The Fuel Cell Technologies Office is developing databases to make it easier for users to find up-to-date...

396

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit, OAS-FS-13-03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Energy Regulatory Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit OAS-FS-13-03 November 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 15, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) balance sheets as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of net costs, changes in net position, budgetary

397

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Statement Audit, OAS-FS-12-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Financial Statement Audit OAS-FS-12-01 November 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 15, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Statement Audit The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) Fiscal Year 2011 balance sheet and the related statements of net cost, changes in net position, budgetary resources, and custodial activity.

398

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 < 1 < DATE: TO: FROM: July 1,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Revised DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 71.1 Headquarters Business Clearance Process SUMMARY: There was mention in the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) report titled "Managing at the Speed of Light - Improving Mission Support Performance" that Departmental procurement personnel don't understand the Business Clearance (BC) process. In an effort to address this issue, each Procurement Director (PD) and Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) was ask to review Acquisition Guide Chapter 7 1.1 Headquarters Business Clearance Process and identify anything that was unclear, as well as recommend changes or ideas which

399

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 DATE: TO: FROM: March 25,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Rescind Policy Flashes 201 0-04 "Cease All Funding of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)" and 201 0-06 "Additional Documentation Regarding Policy Flash Number 201 0-04" SUMMARY: The purpose of this flash to inform you that on March 10,201 0, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued an opinion regarding ACORN. In its opinion, the District Court concluded that the funding prohibitions regarding ACORN and related entities in FY 201 0 Continuing Resolution and in several of FY 201 0 appropriations acts

400

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

65 65 ' July 7,20 1 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Notification of Employee Rights under the National Labor Relations Act SUMMARY: This Flash forwards a draft Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause, 52.222- 40, Notification of Employee Rights under the National Labor Relations Act. Executive Order (EO) 13496, Notification of Employee Rights under Federal Labor Laws, dated January 30,2009, requires contractors and subcontractors to post a notice that informs employees of their rights under Federal labor laws, including the National Labor Relations Act. This Act encourages collective bargaining and protects the exercise by workers of their freedom

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: - - -- . POLICY FLASH 2005-18 February 14, 2005 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, ME-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Small Business Contracting Policy Update SUMMARY: This Policy Flash forwards (1) information on locating Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSBs) and (2) a solicitation provision which provides guidance to prospective offerors on the impact of teaming arrangements on their small business status. 1 -- -- --------- 1. To locate SDVOSBs, you can go to the Department of Veteran Affairs' website for the Center for Veterans Enterprise site at http://www.vetbiz.gov/default2.htm. From that site you can link to the "Search for a Business" at http://vip.vetbiz.gov/search/default.asp to find SDVQSBs. 2. The following provision is recommended for solicitations

402

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 . 1 . January 20,20 1 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Commercial Items Test Program SUMMARY: Attached for your information is a copy of Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC) Letter 2009-04. It advises that the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 201 0, Section 8 16 authorizes extension of the Commercial Items Test Program from January 1,20 10 to January 1,20 12 and that an expedited FAR Case is being processed to insert the new date at FAR 13.500(d). Also attached is a class deviation authorizing the use of simplified acquisition procedures for commercial items up to $5.5 million [$I1 million for acquisitions of commercial items under FAR

403

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

POLICY FLASH 2010-08 POLICY FLASH 2010-08 DATE: TO: FROM: October 28,2009 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 1 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Amendment to Extend the Partnership Agreement between the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Department of Energy (DOE) SUMMARY: The purpose of this flash is to advise you that an amendment was issued pursuant to Section VII of the Partnership Agreement (PA) between the SBA and the DOE. The amendment extends the current PA until November 30,2009. All other terms and conditions of the PA remain unchanged. This flash and its attachment will be available online at the following website: http://mana~ement.enerm.nov/policy nuidancelpolicy flashes.htm.

404

Release Date: April 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

April 2010 DOE/EIA-0121 (2009/04Q) April 2010 DOE/EIA-0121 (2009/04Q) Next Release Date: June 2010 Quarterly Coal Report October - December 2009 April 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric, and Alternate Fuels U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 _____________________________________________________________________________ This report is available on the Web at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/quarterly/qcr.pdf _____________________________________________ This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the independent statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this

405

Audit Report: OAS-FS-13-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report: OAS-FS-13-01 Audit Report: OAS-FS-13-01 Audit Report: OAS-FS-13-01 September 30, 2012 Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund's Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Statement Audit The Office of Inspector General (OIG) engaged the independent public accounting firm of KPMG, LLP (KPMG) to perform an audit of the United States Department of Energy's Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Fund's FY 2011 financial statements. KPMG concluded that the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the D&D Fund as of September 30, 2011, and its net costs, changes in net position, and budgetary resources, in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles. As part of this review, the auditors also considered the D&D Fund's

406

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 10182010 Location(s): Connersville, Indiana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office October 18, 2010 CX-004284:...

407

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Projects CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04132010 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 13, 2010 CX-001689:...

408

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11022009 Location(s): St. Paul, Minnesota Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 2, 2009 CX-000035:...

409

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Landfill CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06082011 Location(s): Happauge, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office June 8, 2011 CX-006060:...

410

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04202010 Location(s): Champaign, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 20, 2010 CX-001877:...

411

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05182010 Location(s): Sacramento, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 18, 2010 CX-002402:...

412

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08192010 Location(s): South Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 19, 2010 CX-003496:...

413

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A9, A11, B3.1, B5.1 Date: 12022009 Location(s): San Diego County, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 2, 2009 CX-000102:...

414

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04072010 Location(s): Kern County, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 7, 2010 CX-001642:...

415

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Study CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06242011 Location(s): Brookston, Indiana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office June 23, 2011 CX-006309:...

416

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Geothermal Systems CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04162010 Location(s): California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 16, 2010 CX-001694:...

417

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12202009 Location(s): Berks County, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 20, 2009 CX-000258:...

418

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lake CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09072010 Location(s): Salt Lake County, Utah Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office September 7, 2010 CX-003875:...

419

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Award CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B3.8, B5.1 Date: 09172010 Location(s): New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office September 17, 2010 CX-003913:...

420

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 11182009 Location(s): Howard County, Maryland Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 18, 2009 CX-000195:...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Remote Sensing CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 05112011 Location(s): Colorado Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 10, 2011 CX-005789:...

422

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 02162011 Location(s): Hull, Massachusetts Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 16, 2011 CX-005199:...

423

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-Phase 1 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 12142010 Location(s): Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 14, 2010 CX-004735:...

424

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 09092011 Location(s): Chicago, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office September 9, 2011 CX-006782:...

425

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 09152010 Location(s): West Palm Beach, Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office September 15, 2010 CX-003911:...

426

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11172010 Location(s): New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 17, 2010 CX-004412:...

427

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cost Assessment CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09202011 Location(s): Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office September 20, 2011 CX-006860:...

428

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applied: B3.3, B3.6 Date: 05252011 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 25, 2011 CX-006015:...

429

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rebate Request B CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 10082010 Location(s): Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office October 8, 2010 CX-004059:...

430

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Generator CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04122011 Location(s): Ann Arbor, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 12, 2011 CX-005693:...

431

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Prize CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 03302011 Location(s): Massachusetts Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 30, 2011 CX-005522:...

432

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 11162011 Location(s): Nationwide Office(s): Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Oak Ridge Office (ORO) November 16, 2011...

433

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Turbines CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B3.3 Date: 07152011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 15, 2011 CX-006238:...

434

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waters CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01132011 Location(s): West Oahu, Hawaii Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office January 13, 2011 CX-005007:...

435

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 02112010 Location(s): Los Alamos County, New Mexico Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 10, 2010 CX-000658:...

436

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

City Irvine CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11112009 Location(s): Irvine, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 11, 2009...

437

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Building Materials CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03292010 Location(s): Caledonia, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 29, 2010...

438

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Housing at University at Albany CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 03232010 Location(s): Albany, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office...

439

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solar - Roof Mounted - Ebay CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02082011 Location(s): South Jordan, Utah Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February...

440

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06232010 Location(s): Arcola, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office June 23, 2010 CX-002798:...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03122010 Location(s): Palestine, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 12, 2010 CX-001234: Categorical...

442

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6, B5.1 Date: 07262010 Location(s): Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 26, 2010 CX-003149:...

443

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01202010 Location(s): Tulsa, Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office January 20, 2010 CX-000620:...

444

Audit Report: IG-0878 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Audit Report: IG-0878 December 11, 2012 Follow-up Audit of the Department's Cyber Security Incident Management Program The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002...

445

Audit of Departmental Integrated Standardized Core Accounting...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit of Departmental Integrated Standardized Core Accounting System (DISCAS) Operations at Selected Field Sites, AP-FS-97-02 Audit of Departmental Integrated Standardized Core...

446

Audit Report: IG-0570 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the facility's reliability. Audit Report: IG-0570 More Documents & Publications Fiscal Year 2010 Agency Financial Report Audit Report: OAS-L-08-01 Data Center Optimization Plan...

447

Audit Report: IG-0799 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IG-0799 Audit Report: IG-0799 July 31, 2008 Sandia National Laboratories Nuclear Weapons Safety Program (U) The following is an unclassified summary of the classified Audit Report...

448

Audit Report: IG-0670 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report: IG-0670 Audit Report: IG-0670 January 3, 2005 Well Decommissioning Activities at the Hanford Site Hanford site waste has contaminated the groundwate through various...

449

Audit Report: IG-0876 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report: IG-0876 Audit Report: IG-0876 November 6, 2012 The Department of Energy's Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer Programs The...

450

Audit Report: IG-0417 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 Audit Report: IG-0417 March 13, 1998 Audit of the Department of Energy's Management of Research and Development Integration The Congress, independent task forces, and advisory...

451

Audit Report: IG-0494 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report: IG-0494 Audit Report: IG-0494 February 13, 2001 The U.S. Department of Energy's Corporate Human Resource Information System The Department of Energy maintains...

452

Audit Report: IG-0379 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Report: IG-0379 September 8, 1995 Report on Audit of Bonneville Power Administration's Energy Resource Programs Audit Report: IG-0379 More Documents & Publications EIS-0145:...

453

Audit Report: IG-0416 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 Audit Report: IG-0416 December 23, 1997 Audit of Support Services Subcontracts at Argonne National Laboratory Departmental policy prohibits the use of subcontracts awarded by...

454

Audit Report: IG-0366 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

15, 1995 Audit of Management of the Site Characterization Program at Yucca Mountain Audit Report: IG-0366 More Documents & Publications EIS-0250-S1: Draft Supplemental...

455

Audit Report: IG-0414 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IG-0414 Audit Report: IG-0414 December 5, 1997 Audit of the Department of Energy's Management of Field Contractor Employees Assigned to Headquarters and Other Federal Agencies The...

456

Audit Report: IG-0669 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

activities. Audit Report: IG-0669 More Documents & Publications Management Challenges at the Department of Energy, IG-0667 Special Report: IG-0667 Audit Report: IG-0670...

457

Environmental Compliance Audit & Assessment Program Manual  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Audit & Assessment Program Manual C-5 Appendix C. ExamplesAudit & Assessment Program Manual Prepared by: Environment,1 Original Issue All Rename manual; allow for internal and

Thorson, Patrick

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

Audit Report: IG-0799 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 Audit Report: IG-0799 July 31, 2008 Sandia National Laboratories Nuclear Weapons Safety Program (U) The following is an unclassified summary of the classified Audit Report on...

459

Audit of EPA Protocol Gas Suppliers  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... 2008 NIST was chosen as the independent analytical laboratory for EPA audits. ... Only a limited number of vendors were sampled for the 2006 audit. ...

2012-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

460

Enhancing Trust by Enhancing the Audit Process  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Focussing on security ? Clear requirements what is to be audited in the audit ? Accreditation of auditors and Certification of CAs Jens Bender ...

2013-04-10T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Does Customer Auditing Help Chinese Workers?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Alberto Brause. 2007. Does monitoring improve labourDoes Customer Auditing Help Chinese Workers? Guojun He* andworkers well-being. Auditing does not affect the suppliers

He, Goujun; Perloff, Jeffrey M.

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

Audit Report: IG-0789 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 Audit Report: IG-0789 March 13, 2008 Audit Report on Management of the Department's Publicly Accessible Websites The Department of Energy and its prime contractors operate...

463

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cooperative Research and Cooperative Research and Development Agreements at the Department of Energy's Office of Science Laboratories DOE/IG-0826 September 2009 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 30, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Cooperative Research and Development Agreements at the Department of Energy's Office of Science Laboratories: BACKGROUND Technology transfer, disseminating technology developed by the Department of Energy's laboratories to the general science community and the public, including non-Federal technology partners, and private firms, is one of the Department's top priorities. One of the ways in which this transfer is accomplished is through the use of Cooperative

464

Audit Report: ER-B-99-06 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 Audit Report: ER-B-99-06 April 14, 1999 Bechtel Jacobs Payroll Creation The Oak Ridge Operations Office (Operations Office) awarded a contract to the Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC (Bechtel Jacobs) in December 1997. The terms of the contract require Bechtel Jacobs to create new jobs in the Oak Ridge area with a cumulative payroll of $427 million through Fiscal Year (FY) 2003. In FY 1998, the contract required Bechtel Jacobs to create $11 million in new payroll. The objective of the audit was to determine if Bechtel Jacobs met its commitment to create at least $11 million in new payroll in the Oak Ridge, Tennessee area through September 30, 1998. Audit Report: ER-B-99-06 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0498 Semiannual Report to Congress: April 1 - September 30, 1999

465

Audit Report: ER-B-98-02 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 Audit Report: ER-B-98-02 October 24, 1997 Audit of Environmental Monitoring and Health Physics Laboratories at the Savannah River Site The Environmental Monitoring and Health Physics Laboratories at the Department of Energy's (Department) Savannah River Site are over 40 years old and are approaching the end of their useful lives. The managing and operating contractor, Westinghouse Savannah River Company (Westinghouse), and the Savannah River Operations Office (Operations Office) proposed to build two new facilities to replace them. We conducted this audit to determine whether the construction of new laboratories was the most cost-effective alternative to accomplish the site's environmental monitoring and health physics missions. Audit Report: ER-B-98-02

466

Audit Report: ER-B-98-02 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ER-B-98-02 ER-B-98-02 Audit Report: ER-B-98-02 October 24, 1997 Audit of Environmental Monitoring and Health Physics Laboratories at the Savannah River Site The Environmental Monitoring and Health Physics Laboratories at the Department of Energy's (Department) Savannah River Site are over 40 years old and are approaching the end of their useful lives. The managing and operating contractor, Westinghouse Savannah River Company (Westinghouse), and the Savannah River Operations Office (Operations Office) proposed to build two new facilities to replace them. We conducted this audit to determine whether the construction of new laboratories was the most cost-effective alternative to accomplish the site's environmental monitoring and health physics missions. Audit Report: ER-B-98-02

467

Microsoft Word - Transmittal of Final Audit Report A-13-02, SRS-CCP.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DSM:MAG:13-1490:UFC 2300.00 DSM:MAG:13-1490:UFC 2300.00 Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221 August 6, 2013 Mr. John E. Kieling, Chief Hazardous Waste Bureau New Mexico Environment Department 2905 Rodeo Park Drive East, Building 1 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 Subject: Transmittal of the Final Audit Report for Recertification Audit A-13-02, SRS/CCP Dear Mr. Kieling: This letter transmits the Final Audit Report for Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) Recertification Audit A-13-02 of the Savannah River Site Central Characterization Program (SRS/CCP) for processes performed to characterize and certify waste in accordance with the Waste Isolation

468

Audit Report: OAS-FS-12-03 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 Audit Report: OAS-FS-12-03 November 2, 2011 The Department of Energy's Nuclear Waste Fund's Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Statements The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Department of Energy's Nuclear Waste Fund's (Fund) Fiscal Year 2011 balance sheet and the related statements of net cost, changes in net position, and budgetary resources.To fulfill the Office of Inspector General's audit responsibilities, we contracted with the independent public accounting firm of KPMG LLP (KPMG) to conduct the audit, subject to our review. KPMG is responsible for expressing an opinion on the Fund's financial statements and reporting on applicable internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations. The Office of Inspector

469

Audit Report: OAS-M-12-05 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report: OAS-M-12-05 Audit Report: OAS-M-12-05 Audit Report: OAS-M-12-05 June 29, 2012 Office of Secure Transportation Capabilities The National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Office of Secure Transportation (OST) is responsible for safely and securely transporting nuclear weapons, weapon components and special nuclear material for customers such as the Department of Energy, Department of Defense and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The demand for OST services is expected to increase significantly over the next 7 years as a result of current Presidential initiatives and international nonproliferation efforts. OST forecasts show an increase in mission demand through 2019. Due to the importance of OST's mission to safely and securely transport nuclear weapons, we performed this audit to evaluate the challenges OST faces in

470

DATE: February 7, 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: July 8, 2011 Report Number: INS-L-11-02 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-40 (S10IS001) SUBJECT: Letter Report on "Implementation of Nuclear Weapons Quality Assurance Requirements at Los Alamos National Laboratory" TO: Manager, Los Alamos Site Office INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Los Alamos National Laboratory (Los Alamos) is a multidisciplinary research and production institution responsible for the design and production of nuclear weapons components. In its effort to attain the highest quality in weapons engineering design and manufacturing, the Department of Energy

471

Industrial Energy Audit Basics by an Energy Auditor  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The purpose of an energy audit is the first step in energy cost control. There are two types of energy audits - Traditional and Investment grades. The process of an energy audit consists of collecting and then processing data, specifying changes, and finally producing an action plan. Before visiting the site utility bills need to be obtained. Building information and weather data should be gathered and any information on major equipment should be gathered. When the auditor goes to the site, safety if of prime importance. Before starting a walk-thru, a meeting with plant managers and equipment operators should take place, then the collecting of data. After returning to the office the data is analyzed and energy conservation opportunities are developed and a report written. A Traditional energy audit is technical. It is a snapshot that assumes all conditions stay the same. It is about 75 percent accurate. It consists of all the steps above but its weaknesses is that it is focused on equipment, ignoring the human element, and is generic in its recommendations. No commitment is obtained from management and no measurement or verification is established. The Investment Grade audit is the Traditional audit plus Risk Assessment. It reduces uncertainty, increases consistency, and produces a 95 to 115 percent accuracy. It looks at ancillary equipment, provides a maintenance program, and looks at future plans. The Investment Grade audit considers the PEOPLE factor which includes management commitment, operator training, budget, and maintenance. It also considers Financial and Legal factors as well as Air Quality issues. Generally, utility bills should exceed $500,000 to justify an Investment Grade audit. Time is also an issue in that money is going out in fees and expenses and not coming in as savings. There must also be a project manager assigned to coordinate communications. The Investment Grade audit makes continuous commissioning and performance contracting possible. With the high cost of energy today, energy audits are a worthwhile consideration for any business. Know what is available in the market and who is qualified. You are loosing money every hour equipment is operating inefficiently.

Phillips, J.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

Please Distribute and Post STANFORD UNIVERSITY OFFICE MEMORANDUM  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

(IG-13-003, November 15, 2012) The Office of Inspector General contracted with the independent public with the Government Accountability Office's Government Auditing Standards and the Office of Management and Budget section of NASA's FY 2012 Agency Financial Report for the Inspector General's transmittal letter and Pw

Ford, James

473

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WR-FS-97-04 More Documents & Publications Report on Matters Identified at the Rocky Flats Field Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996...

474

Report on Matters Identified at the Rocky Flats Field Office...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rocky Flats Field Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996 Financial Statements, WR-FS-97-03 Report on Matters Identified at the Rocky Flats Field...

475

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Position (as of September 30, 1995), IG-FS-96-01 Report on Matters Identified at the Rocky Flats Field Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996...

476

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2009 1, 2009 CX-000184: Categorical Exclusion Determination Maine State Energy Office CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/11/2009 Location(s): Maine Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 11, 2009 CX-000183: Categorical Exclusion Determination Illinois County McHenry CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/11/2009 Location(s): McHenry County, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 11, 2009 CX-000182: Categorical Exclusion Determination Florida State Energy Office CX(s) Applied: A8, A9, A11, B2.2, B3.1, B3.6, B5.1 Date: 11/11/2009 Location(s): Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 11, 2009 CX-000181: Categorical Exclusion Determination Florida County Escambia

477

Date Event  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Timeline of DOE's review of the Solyndra Loan Guarantee Application Timeline of DOE's review of the Solyndra Loan Guarantee Application Date Event 2005 Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program created (as part of EPAct 2005) Aug. 8, 2006 DOE issues solicitation seeking pre-applications for Title XVII loan guarantees Dec. 28, 2006 Solyndra submits pre-application, seeking funding for its Fab 1 manufacturing facility April - June 2007 DOE conducts financial and technical review of Solyndra pre-application Oct. 4, 2007 DOE invites Solyndra, and 15 other applicants, to submit full applications May 6, 2008 Company submits full application, seeking funding for its Fab 2 manufacturing facility. DOE begins due diligence. Sept. 4, 2008 DOE loan programs staff draft memorandum indicating that Solyndra was the "earliest mover" and may receive conditional commitment by January 16, 2009

478

Audit of the Replacement High Level Waste Evaporator at Savannah River, ER-B-95-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF THE REPLACEMENT HIGH LEVEL WASTE EVAPORATOR AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE The Office of Audit Services wants to make the distribution of its audit reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electroni- cally through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doc.gov Department of Energy Headquarters Anonymous FTP vm1.hqadmin.doe.gov U.S. Department of Energy Human Resources and Administration

479

Audit Report: IG-0807  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Practices at the Bonneville Power Practices at the Bonneville Power Administration DOE/IG-0807 December 2008 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 9, 2 0 0 8 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Inspector General SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Cyber Security Risk Management Practices at the Bonneville Power Administration" BACKGROUND The Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville) provides electrical power to millions of custoniers in eight states in the Pacific Northwest. To support this critical function, Bonneville makes extensive use of a number of information systems to conduct various activities, including financial management, operation of extensive electricity transmission systems, and marketing and transferring wholesale electrical power. Some of

480

Audit Report: IG-0749  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy, Science, Energy, Science, and Environment Sites' Implementation of the Design Basis Threat DOE/IG-0749 December 2006 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 14, 2006 MEMORANDUM FOR .13HEfiECREJARY 4 - Crregor . Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "'I'he Department's Energy, Science, and Environment Sites' Implenneritation of the Design Basis Threat" BACKGROUND 'Phe Department of Energy uses the "Design Basis Threat" (DBT) process to guide and manage its safeguards and security program throughout the complex. The DBT identifies the most credible threats posed by adversaries to highly sensitive and classified Departmental qssets and operations. In essence, the DBT sets the standards that site

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "audit office date" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Audit Report: IG-0773  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Confirmatory Bioassay Testing at Confirmatory Bioassay Testing at Selected Sites DOE/IG-0773 August 2007 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 17, 2007 MEMORANDUM FOR FROM: Inspector General S U BJ ECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Confirmatory Bioassay Testing at Selected Sites" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy maintains a significant inventory of radioactive substances at facilities throughout the United States. To help ensure the safety of its workforce, the Department established a two-tiered approach to biological or "bioassay" testing of workers to determine whether and to what extent they may have absorbed radioactive material. The more intense process mandates biological testing and applies to the

482

Audit Report: IG-0758  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2007 2, 2007 MEMORANDUM FOR FROM: Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The National Nuclear Security Administration's Implementation of the Federal Information Security Management Act" BACKGROUND The National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) mission includes maintaining and enhancing the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile, reducing global danger from weapons of mass destruction, and providing safe and effective nuclear propulsion. To achieve its mission goals, the NNSA utilizes many classified and unclassified computer networks and individual systems. Given the sensitivity of the infonnation residing on these networks and systems, strong cyber security measures are essential for protecting operational, personally identifiable, and other critical data from compromise. In Fiscal

483

Audit Report: IG-0805  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Practice at the Southeastern, Practice at the Southeastern, Southwestern, and Western Area Power Administrations DOE/IG-0805 November 2008 Department of Energy Washington, DC 2 0 5 8 5 November 2 0 , 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR FROM: lnspector General SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Cyber Security Risk Management Practices at the Southeastern, Southwestern, and Western Area Power Administrations" BACKGROUND The Southeastern, Southwestern, and Western Area Power Administrations provide electrical power to customers in 29 states. To support this critical function, the Power Marketing Administrations (PMAs) utilize infornlation systems to conduct various activities, including financial management, marketing, and transferring wholesale electrical power across the Nation's electrical grids. In particular, Southwestern and

484

Audit Report: IG-0787  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Department's Cyber Security The Department's Cyber Security Incident Management Program DOE/IG-0787 January 2008 Department sf Energy Washington, DC 20585 January 1 6 , 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR THE, SECRETARY FROM: /%* Greg y H. riedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department's Cyber Security Incident Management Program'' BACKGROUND The Department of Energy operates numerous interconnected computer networks and systems to help accon~plish its strategic missions in the areas of energy, defense, science, and the environment. These systems are frequently subjected to sophisticated cyber attacks that could potentially affect the Department's ability to carry out its mission. During Fiscal Year 2006, the Department experienced 132 incidents of sufficient severity

485

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report Audit Report The Department of Energy's Appliance and Equipment Standards Program OAS-M-13-05 August 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 16, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Appliance and Equipment Standards Program" BACKGROUND The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 established a national-level energy conservation program for major appliances and called for setting efficiency targets. This Act, along with subsequent Acts, established mandatory energy efficiency and water conservation

486

Vehicle Technologies Office: Active Solicitations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Active Solicitations to Active Solicitations to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Active Solicitations on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: Active Solicitations on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Active Solicitations on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Active Solicitations on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: Active Solicitations on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: Active Solicitations on AddThis.com... Active Solicitations To explore current financial opportunity solicitations, click on the opportunity titles in the table below. To sort the list, click on the arrows in the column headings. Technology Solicitation Title Open Date Close Date Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Research and Development for Hydrogen Storage

487

Compressed Air Audits using AIRMaster  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Air compressors are a significant industrial energy user and therefore a prime target for industrial energy audits. The project goal was to develop a software tool, AIRMaster, and supporting methodology for performing compressed air system audits. Seven field audits were conducted to refine the software and methodology as well as assess the savings potential of six common Operation and Maintenance measures. Audit results yielded significant savings with short payback periods. Total estimated savings for the project were 4,056,000 kWh or 49.2% of annual compressor energy for a cost savings of $152,000. Total implementation costs were $94,700 for a project payback period of 0.6 years. Capital benefits of delaying or avoiding the cost of a new compressor might double the energy benefits if a new compressor is being considered. The methodology proved to be a simple and effective audit tool.

Wheeler, G. M.; McGill, R. D.; Bessey, E. G.; Vischer, K.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

488

Audit Report Contract Awards to Small Businesses Under the Mentor-  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contract Awards to Small Contract Awards to Small Businesses Under the Mentor- Protégé Program DOE/IG-0898 November 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 20, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Contract Awards to Small Businesses Under the Mentor-Protégé Program" BACKGROUND The goal of the Department of Energy's Mentor-Protégé Program is to provide an opportunity for eligible small businesses to receive developmental assistance in business and technical areas. The Program is designed to improve capabilities to perform contracts and subcontracts for the

489

Semiannual report to Congress on Inspector General Audit Reports, October 1, 1994--March 31, 1995  

SciTech Connect

This is the Secretary of Energy`s twelfth Semiannual Report to Congress submitted under the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act Amendments of 1988 (Public Law 100-504), agency heads are to report to Congress on the status of final action taken on audit report recommendations. This report complements a report prepared by the Department`s Office of Inspector General that provides information on audit reports issued during the period and on the status of management decisions made on Inspector General audit reports. During the period covered by this report, October 1, 1994 through March 31, 1995, the Department took final action on 32 operational, financial, and preaward audit reports. At the end of the period 90 reports awaited final action. Final action was taken on four contract and financial assistance audits, leaving four reports requiring final action at the end of the period. This report has three sections. The first section outlines significant audit resolution and followup accomplishments achieved by the Department during the reporting period. The second section contains the statistical tables that illustrate the status of final action on Inspector General audit reports. The third lists the audit reports that are one year or more past management decision and have not completed final action. This section also provides the status of corrective actions on each of these reports.

NONE

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

490

Office of Information Resources  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Database Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Database Bureau: DOE-ID Project Unique ID: Date: May 8,2008 A. CONTACT INFORMATION 1. Who is the person completing this document? Nicole Brooks Title: FOIA/PA Officer Organization: DOE-ID Public Affairs Office Address: 1955 N. Fremont Ave, MS 1203 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 2. Who is the system owner? Nicole Brooks, FOIA/PA Officer U.S. DOE, Idaho Operations Office DOE-ID Public Affairs Office Address: 1955 N. Fremont Ave, MS 1203 Idaho Falls, Idaho 834 15 3. Who is the system manager for this system o r application? Nicole Brooks, FOIA/PA Officer U.S. DOE, Idaho Operations Office DOE-ID Public Affairs Office Address: 1955 N. Fremont Ave, MS 1203 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 4. Who is the IT Security Manager who reviewed this document?

491

Office of Information Resources  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Billing System Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Billing System Bureau: Department of Energy Project Unique ID: 01 9-1 0-01 -22-02-3048-00 Date: 02/08/2008 A. CONTACT INFORMATION 1) Who is the person completing this document? Joanne Csordas (HS-1.21), Office of Business Operations, Office of Resource Management, Office of Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, HS-1.21, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20585, (301) 903-3573 2) Who is the system owner? Joanne Csordas (HS-1.2 l), Office of Business Operations, Office of Resource Management, Office of Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, HS- 1.2 1, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20585, (301) 903-3573 3) Who is the system manager for this system or application?

492

Audit of construction management at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

The Secretary of Energy`s streamlining initiatives, coupled with established policy, require the Idaho Operations Office (Idaho) to ensure that its construction projects are necessary and justified. Accordingly, the objectives of this audit were to determine if Idaho was validating project plans; identifying and evaluating construction project alternatives; and reassessing the need for planned construction in accordance with the Laboratory`s decreasing mission needs.

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

493

Audit Report: DOE/IG-0893  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Follow-up Audit of the Department of Energy's Financial Assistance for Integrated Biorefinery Projects

494

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy's Nuclear Department of Energy's Nuclear Waste Fund's Fiscal Year 2013 Financial Statement Audit OAS-FS-14-02 December 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 11, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF STANDARD CONTRACT MANAGEMENT FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Department of Energy's Nuclear Waste Fund's Fiscal Year 2013 Financial Statement Audit" The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Department of Energy's Nuclear Waste Fund's Fiscal Year 2013 balance sheet and the related statements of net cost, changes in net position and combined statements of budgetary resources.

495

Audit Report: OAS-L-04-05 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Audit Report: OAS-L-04-05 November 20, 2003 Audit of Controls Over Expenditures Within the Office of Secure Transportation The National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Office of Secure Transportation (OST) supports the Department of Energy's (Department) national security core programs by safely and securely transporting nuclear weapons, special nuclear materials, and components between Department facilities and Department of Defense destinations. OST's primary field facility locations are the Transportation Safeguards Training Center at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas, and its Federal Agent Facilities in Albuquerque, New Mexico; Amarillo, Texas; and Oak Ridge, Tennessee. OST's budget for Fiscal Year.2002 was about $160 million. At NNSA's request, the Office of Inspector General conducted the audit to

496

A Guide to Energy Audits  

SciTech Connect

Energy audits are a powerful tool for uncovering operational and equipment improvements that will save energy, reduce energy costs, and lead to higher performance. Energy audits can be done as a stand-alone effort or as part of a larger analysis across a group of facilities, or across an owner's portfolio. The purpose of an energy audit (sometimes called an 'energy assessment' or 'energy study') is to determine where, when, why and how energy is used in a facility, and to identify opportunities to improve efficiency. Energy auditing services are offered by energy services companies (ESCOs), energy consultants and engineering firms. The energy auditor leads the audit process but works closely with building owners, staff and other key participants throughout to ensure accuracy of data collection and appropriateness of energy efficiency recommendation. The audit typically begins with a review of historical and current utility data and benchmarking of your building's energy use against similar buildings. This sets the stage for an onsite inspection of the physical building. The main outcome of an energy audit is a list of recommended energy efficiency measures (EEMs), their associated energy savings potential, and an assessment of whether EEM installation costs are a good financial investment.

Baechler, Michael C.

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

497

United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28/07 10:24 FAX 301 903 4656 CAPITAL REGION [a 002 28/07 10:24 FAX 301 903 4656 CAPITAL REGION [a 002 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL DATE: November 28, 2007 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A07TG029) . Audit Report No.: OAS-L-08-02 SUBJECT: Report on "Department's Implementation of the Strateg:ic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System - Overall Project Planning" TO: Chief Financial Officer, CF-1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE On September 28, 2007, we issued a report on the Department's Implementation of the Strategic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System - Transition Planning, Interfaces, and Testing (OAS-L-07-26). This was the first in a series of reports to address the Department of Energy's (Department) initiative and to determine whether ongoing efforts

498

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 09242012 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 24, 2012 CX-009336: Categorical Exclusion...

499

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2012 CX-008228: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hydropower Energy Resource (HyPER) Harvester CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04112012 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): Golden...

500

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Golden Field Office November 24, 2010 CX-004532: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tidal Energy System for On-Shore Power Generation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 11242010...