Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "atascosa wharton fayette" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fayette Fayette County, Pennsylvania to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO

2

Atascosa County, Texas ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Atascosa County, Texas ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Atascosa County, Texas ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number...

3

Fayette, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

| Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Fayette, Utah: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates...

4

Coweta-Fayette EMC- Home Plus Loan Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation (EMC) provides electric and natural gas service to 58,000 customers in Georgia's Coweta, Fayette, Meriwether, Heard, Troop and Fulton counties....

5

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fayette County Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Digg

6

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia) Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia) < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Solar Water Heating Program Info State Georgia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Existing Homes Solar Water Heater: $750 New Homes Solar Water Heater: $1,250 - $1,500 Provider Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation (EMC) provides electric and natural gas service to 58,000 customers in Georgia's Coweta, Fayette, Meriwether, Heard, Troop and Fulton counties. Currently, Coweta-Fayette EMC offers rebates on solar water heaters from $750 up to $1,500 as part of the Touchstone Energy Home Program. Solar

7

Coweta-Fayette EMC- Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation (EMC) provides electric and natural gas service to 58,000 customers in Georgia's Coweta, Fayette, Meriwether, Heard, Troop and Fulton counties.

8

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Water Heating Windows, Doors, & Skylights Maximum Rebate Double-Pane/Storm Windows: $500 Programmable Thermostat: $50 per home Program Info State Georgia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Existing Homes Electric Heat Pumps: $150 - $300 Dual Fuel Heat Pumps: $200 Geothermal Heat Pumps: $1000 Water Heaters: $250 Attic Insulation: $90 - $150 Floor Insulation: $150 Double-Pane/Storm Windows: $50/window Programmable Thermostat: $25/unit

9

Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Jump to: navigation, search Name Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Place Georgia Utility Id 4432 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Additional Residential Meter Option Residential Electric Heat Rates Residential Large Commercial Commercial Large Commercial* Commercial Outdoor Lighting Town and Country 100 W Lighting Outdoor Lighting Traditionaire 150 W Lighting Residential Residential Residential Time-Of-Use Residential Small Commercial Commercial

10

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - LaFayette High School | U.S.  

Office of Science (SC) Website

LaFayette High School LaFayette High School National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - LaFayette High School Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The LaFayette High School team tours the National Mall in Washington, DC on

11

Wharton County Elec Coop, Inc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wharton County Elec Coop, Inc Wharton County Elec Coop, Inc Place Texas Utility Id 20472 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location TRE NERC ERCOT Yes ISO Ercot Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Commercial - LP3 Commercial Commercial and Small Power Service Commercial Flood Light Fixtures-1000 w Mercury, Metallic or HPS Lighting Flood Light Fixtures-400 w Mercury, Metallic or HPS Lighting Industrial - LP3 Industrial Irrigation and Seasonal Agricultural Service Commercial Large Industrial Industrial Large Industrial-Primary Voltage Industrial

12

Award Recipient of ENERGY STAR Challenge for Industry JM Eagle Wharton Plastic Pipe Manufacturing Plant  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wharton Plastic Pipe Manufacturing Plant JM Eagle 10807 U.S. 59 Road Wharton, TX 77488 The Wharton Plastic Pipe Manufacturing Plant, located on an old cattle field, opened in 1985 by first manufacturing PVC pipe. The manufacturing of injection molding was added in 1988, corrugated pipe was added in 2009, and corrugated fittings were added in 2011. There are expectations for the plant to expand into manufacturing PE pipe fittings in the future. The Wharton plant achieved the ENERGY STAR Challenge for Industry in June 2010. The plant achieved a 15.5% reduction in energy intensity in the first year following its baseline. The success of achieving the Challenge for Industry came principally from an energy conservation program that focused on not operating equipment other than that needed for current production,

13

PDF Document (387k)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

) ) " ) " ) " ) " ) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Houston Webb Duval Frio Kerr Edwards Uvalde Bee Bexar Zavala Kinney Dimmit La Salle Kimble Medina Matagorda Travis Lee Sutton Nueces Real Maverick DeWitt Kleberg Lavaca Calhoun Hays Goliad Atascosa Wharton

14

Atascosa County, Texas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

8661281°, -98.5721016° 8661281°, -98.5721016° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":28.8661281,"lon":-98.5721016,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

15

Fayette, Ohio: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ohio: Energy Resources Ohio: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.6733839°, -84.3268925° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":41.6733839,"lon":-84.3268925,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

16

Fayette County, Kentucky: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

°, -84.4802606° °, -84.4802606° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.0606478,"lon":-84.4802606,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

17

Fayette County, Iowa: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

°, -91.9099238° °, -91.9099238° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.9258199,"lon":-91.9099238,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

18

Fayette County, West Virginia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

81.0754657° 81.0754657° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.0615913,"lon":-81.0754657,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

19

Fayette County, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9.6502105° 9.6502105° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.9272324,"lon":-79.6502105,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

20

Fayette County, Tennessee: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

27°, -89.4742177° 27°, -89.4742177° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":35.1257427,"lon":-89.4742177,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "atascosa wharton fayette" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Fayette County, Ohio: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3.4643551° 3.4643551° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.5919809,"lon":-83.4643551,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

22

Fayette County, Georgia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

°, -84.4802606° °, -84.4802606° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":33.4502206,"lon":-84.4802606,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

23

Fayette County, Indiana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

85.1479364° 85.1479364° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.5920377,"lon":-85.1479364,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

24

Fayette County, Texas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2°, -96.8350999° 2°, -96.8350999° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":29.8896442,"lon":-96.8350999,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

25

Fayette County, Alabama: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

63333° 63333° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":33.6871392,"lon":-87.7763333,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

26

Fayette County, Illinois: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

669568°, -89.0179332° 669568°, -89.0179332° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.0669568,"lon":-89.0179332,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

27

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Technologies Building Insulation, Heat pumps, Programmable Thermostats, Water Heaters, Windows, Geothermal Heat Pumps Active Incentive Yes Implementing Sector Utility Energy...

28

Better Buildings: Workforce: Spotlight on Fayette County, Pennsylvania...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

a BPI certified technician to perform a home energy assessment in order for the homeowner to qualify for an energy efficiency upgrade rebate. To achieve the program's goals,...

29

Wharton, New Jersey: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

31546°, -74.5818254° 31546°, -74.5818254° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":40.8931546,"lon":-74.5818254,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

30

Wharton County, Texas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

0932°, -96.1526985° 0932°, -96.1526985° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":29.3690932,"lon":-96.1526985,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

31

Award Recipient of the ENERGY STAR Challenge for Industry Wharton...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

manufacturing resources K-12 school resources Multifamily housing resources Restaurant resources Retail resources Senior care resources Small business resources State and...

32

2010 DOE National Science Bowl Photos - LaFayette High School...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Facebook Facebook External link Share with Twitter Twitter External link Share with Google Bookkmarks Google Bookmarks External link Email a Friend Email link to: send 2010 DOE...

33

San Antonio Regional Middle School Science Bowl | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Bexar, Kendall, Bandera, Medina, Atascosa, Wilson, Guadalupe, Comal Date of Electric Car Competition: 2222013 Please contact the regional coordinator for more information on...

34

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

nstant-lighting-discounts-program-illinois Rebate Coweta-Fayette EMC- Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia) Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation (EMC)...

35

Tax Credits, Rebates & Savings | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia) Georgia Residential Heating & Cooling Solar Water Heating Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership...

36

Tax Credits, Rebates & Savings | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Water Heating Windows, Doors, & Skylights Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation Coweta-Fayette EMC...

37

NIST WTC Public-Private Response Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... IAFSS, ASME, LANL, MIT, Princeton, Northwestern, UT Austin, Georgia Tech, Penn State, Drexel, Wharton, Columbia, Lehigh, UMd, WPI, ...

2012-10-17T23:59:59.000Z

38

WTC Technical Conference  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... IAFSS, ASME, LANL, MIT, Princeton, Northwestern, UT Austin, Georgia Tech, Penn State, Drexel, Wharton, Columbia, Lehigh, UMd, WPI, ...

2011-08-05T23:59:59.000Z

39

No Slide Title  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... IAFSS, ASME, LANL, MIT, Princeton, Northwestern, UT Austin, Georgia Tech, Penn State, Drexel, Wharton, Columbia, Lehigh, UMd, WPI, ...

2011-11-17T23:59:59.000Z

40

NETL F 451.1/1-1, Categorical Exclusion Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky Solid-Fueled Pressurized Chemical Looping with Flue-Gas Turbine Combined Cycle for Improved Plant... Validation of the Solid-Fueled...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "atascosa wharton fayette" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Step 5b: Help Program...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the Necessary Equipment Reducing the Equipment Cost Barrier To help local contractors enter the program more quickly and offset start-up expenses, the Fayette County Better...

42

NETL F 451.1/1-1, Categorical Exclusion Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5113 - 43016 Nicholas D'Amico Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky Low Temperature NOx Storage and Reduction Using Engineered Materials Work at the U. of Kentucky will focus...

43

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DE-FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE DE-FE0000699 315 10 Donald Krastman 5110 -10112 Lexington, Fayette County, KY COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) ANALYSIS DENSITY...

44

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE 315 10 Donald Krastman 5110 -10112 Lexington, Fayette County, KY CHEMICAL STABILIZATION OF FINE COAL WASTE: ELIMINATION OF SLURRY...

45

View / Download  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

University of Pennsylvania's School of. Engineering and Applied Science and the Wharton School. Her development of CermeTi has opened the door to many...

46

An Improved Algorithm for the Generalized Quadratic Assignment ...  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania ... Operations and Information Management, The Wharton School,. University .... feasible solution generators, Lagrangean relaxation, and subgradient optimization to solve hard.

47

GLADY CASSIT Y VANDALIA MURPHY CR EEK BU CKHN-CENT URY CLAY  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

OWN OAKFORD TWENTY-MILE CR EEK CARMICH AELS GOULD KAN ZIGG H ILL CADIZ LEOPOLD MT DAVIS BEARSVILLE AU GU STA FAYETT E C ITY FINK CR EEK HEADSVILLE CAMERON-GARNER TERRA ALTA...

48

Modification date 19 June 2012 18:22:10 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Home Plus Loan Program (Georgia) + (19 June 2012 20:12:34) GIZ-Thailand-National energy efficiency plan as a core element for an activity- and evidence-based...

49

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE DE-FE0000699 315 10 Donald Krastman 5110 -10112 Lexington, Fayette County, KY BENEFICIATION OF FINE SIZE POWDER RIVER BASIN COAL Evaluate a...

50

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DE-FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE DE-FE0000699 315 10 Donald Krastman 5110 -10112 Lexington, Fayette County, KY Dewatering of Fine Coal Pellets Demonstrating the...

51

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE DE-FE0000699 315 10 Donald Krastman 5110 -10112 Lexington, Fayette County, KY DEVELOPMENT OF STRATEGIES TO MINIMIZE THE RELEASE OF TOXIC...

52

R&D Tax Policy During the 1980s: Success of Failure?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1992. "Tax Incentives for R&D: What Do the Data Tell Us?"Implicit Tax Effects of the R&D Tax Credit." Wharton School,on Canadian Industrial R&D Expenditures." Canadian Public

Hall, Bronwyn H.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Process for...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Shari Stevens Region VII Steve Wharton Robert Koke Region III Barbara O'Korn Root Robert Davis Region VIII Gerry Henningsen, Ph.D.,D.V.M. Region IV Lynn Wellman Dale Hoff, Ph.D....

54

Capturing Carbon Will it work to cool the world?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Capturing Carbon Will it work to cool the world? Speakers: Dr. Malcolm Wilson Chief Executive in Exploration Geophysics Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary Theme Leader for Secure Carbon Storage, Carbon Management Canada Don Wharton Vice-President, Sustainable Development TransAlta Corporation

Calgary, University of

55

{Timko Bio 09-11 w-pic.1 } As the Chief Technology & Strategy Officer for Pitney Bowes, Joe Timko leads a portfolio that  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and technology to this role. He joined Pitney Bowes in 2010 from McKinsey & Company where he was a Partner, and operations. Prior to McKinsey, Joe was a product manager and R&D leader for Bell Laboratories Bell and McKinsey, Joe was recognized as a people developer. Joe received an MBA from The Wharton

Lin, Xiaodong

56

Climate Zone Number 2 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2 is defined as 2 is defined as Hot - Humid(2A) with IP Units 6300 < CDD50ºF ≤ 9000 and SI Units 3500 < CDD10ºC ≤ 5000 Dry(2B) with IP Units 6300 < CDD50ºF ≤ 9000 and SI Units 3500 < CDD10ºC ≤ 5000 . The following places are categorized as class 2 climate zones: Acadia Parish, Louisiana Alachua County, Florida Allen Parish, Louisiana Anderson County, Texas Angelina County, Texas Appling County, Georgia Aransas County, Texas Ascension Parish, Louisiana Assumption Parish, Louisiana Atascosa County, Texas Atkinson County, Georgia Austin County, Texas Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana Bacon County, Georgia Baker County, Florida Baker County, Georgia Baldwin County, Alabama Bandera County, Texas Bastrop County, Texas Bay County, Florida Beauregard Parish, Louisiana Bee County, Texas

57

Climate Zone 2A | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Climate Zone 2A Climate Zone 2A Jump to: navigation, search A type of climate defined in the ASHRAE 169-2006 standard consisting of Climate Zone Number 2 and Climate Zone Subtype A. Climate Zone 2A is defined as Hot - Humid with IP Units 6300 < CDD50ºF ≤ 9000 and SI Units 3500 < CDD10ºC ≤ 5000 . The following places are categorized as class 2A climate zones: Acadia Parish, Louisiana Alachua County, Florida Allen Parish, Louisiana Anderson County, Texas Angelina County, Texas Appling County, Georgia Aransas County, Texas Ascension Parish, Louisiana Assumption Parish, Louisiana Atascosa County, Texas Atkinson County, Georgia Austin County, Texas Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana Bacon County, Georgia Baker County, Florida Baker County, Georgia Baldwin County, Alabama Bastrop County, Texas

58

CX-003605: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Categorical Exclusion Determination 5: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003605: Categorical Exclusion Determination Competitive Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Awards CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 07/20/2010 Location(s): Fayette County, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office Fayette County, Pennsylvania will use the Department of Energy funding under the Competitive Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Award to support an energy efficiency and awareness outreach/marketing campaign, a series of residential and non-residential energy audits (which includes assistance in the identification and handoff to qualified implementation subcontractors) as well as project management, assessment and reporting efforts over the three year life of the project.

59

CX-002038: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

38: Categorical Exclusion Determination 38: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-002038: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Community Bike Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/20/2010 Location(s): Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government would use $175,000 in Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant funds to purchase and install equipment associated with a bicycle sharing program throughout downtown Lexington. The proposed bicycle sharing program includes 9 bike stations and 50 bikes at specified locations. Stations would be placed at two major university campuses and several retail areas that are within a short bike-riding distance from downtown. Stations would also be placed along the

60

Data:2588a0d5-6dec-406b-a182-e40a9aebe06a | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

-6dec-406b-a182-e40a9aebe06a -6dec-406b-a182-e40a9aebe06a No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: City of LaFayette, Georgia (Utility Company) Effective date: 2013/04/08 End date if known: Rate name: Residential Service Sector: Residential Description: Source or reference: https://cas.sharepoint.illinoisstate.edu/grants/Sunshot/Lists/DATA%20ENTRY%20Additional%20Information%20Obtained/Attachments/72/City%20of%20LaFayette%20GA%20rates.pdf Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months): Energy (kWh) Minimum (kWh): Maximum (kWh): History (months):

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "atascosa wharton fayette" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31 - 24340 of 29,416 results. 31 - 24340 of 29,416 results. Rebate CoServ- Solar Energy Rebate (Texas) '''''NOTE: Available funding for fiscal year 2012 has been exhausted for the CoServ Solar PV Rebate Program.''''' http://energy.gov/savings/coserv-solar-energy-rebate-texas Rebate CoServ Electric Cooperative- Commercial Energy Efficient Lighting Rebate Program CoServ Electric Cooperative provides rebates for commercial and industrial customers who upgrade to high efficiency lighting for the workplace. A rebate of $0.30/watt saved is available on custom... http://energy.gov/savings/coserv-electric-cooperative-commercial-energy-efficient-lighting-rebate-program Rebate Coweta-Fayette EMC- Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia) Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation (EMC) provides electric and

62

Data:9db2d411-bd2c-432d-9456-bd74299e78a9 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

d411-bd2c-432d-9456-bd74299e78a9 d411-bd2c-432d-9456-bd74299e78a9 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: City of LaFayette, Georgia (Utility Company) Effective date: 2013/04/08 End date if known: Rate name: Large General Service Sector: Commercial Description: Source or reference: https://cas.sharepoint.illinoisstate.edu/grants/Sunshot/Lists/DATA%20ENTRY%20Additional%20Information%20Obtained/Attachments/72/City%20of%20LaFayette%20GA%20rates.pdf Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months): Energy (kWh) Minimum (kWh): Maximum (kWh): History (months):

63

Update on Enhanced Mercury Capture by SO2 Controls  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes the interim results of two projects that focus on understanding and enhancing mercury capture by wet gas desulfurization (FGD) systems. The first project is collecting data from bench scale experiments to determine the reactions and kinetics governing the fate of oxidized memory absorbed by wet FGD liquors. The second project is a 200-MW-scale demonstration of a low-temperature mercury oxidation catalyst at Lower Colorado River Authority's (LCRA's) Fayette Power Project.

2008-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

64

Argonne Transportation Technology R&D Center - Lithium-ion Batteries,  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Alternative Fuels Autonomie Batteries Downloadable Dynamometer Database Engines Green Racing GREET Hybrid Electric Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Materials Modeling, Simulation & Software Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles PSAT Smart Grid Student Competitions Technology Analysis Transportation Research and Analysis Computing Center Working With Argonne Contact TTRDC Photo of battery developers that links to story Press Coverage What's New Multimedia Logo of the Wharton School of Business Dec. 13. Knowledge@Wharton. Green SPorts and Transportation: The Elephant in the Room Logo of Crain's Chicago Business Dec. 10. Crain's Chicago Business. Argonne chemist Pete Chupas named one of Crain's 2013 "40 under 40" Logo of the Sioux City Journal Dec. 2. Sioux City Journal. Ethanol Supporters Say the Numbers Support Their Industry

65

SAS Output  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

and Number of Mines by State, County, and Mine Type, 2012" and Number of Mines by State, County, and Mine Type, 2012" "(thousand short tons)" ,"Underground",,"Surface",,"Total" "Coal-Producing","Number of Mines","Production","Number of Mines","Production","Number of Mines","Production" "State and County" "Alabama",8,12570,38,6752,46,19321 " Bibb","-","-",2,119,2,119 " Blount","-","-",2,236,2,236 " Fayette",1,2249,"-","-",1,2249 " Franklin","-","-",2,137,2,137 " Jackson","-","-",3,152,3,152 " Jefferson",3,3589,9,1106,12,4695

66

"1. W A Parish","Coal","NRG Texas Power LLC",3664 "2. South Texas Project","Nuclear","STP Nuclear Operating Co",2560  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Texas" Texas" "1. W A Parish","Coal","NRG Texas Power LLC",3664 "2. South Texas Project","Nuclear","STP Nuclear Operating Co",2560 "3. Martin Lake","Coal","TXU Generation Co LP",2425 "4. Comanche Peak","Nuclear","TXU Generation Co LP",2406 "5. Monticello","Coal","TXU Generation Co LP",1890 "6. Sabine","Gas","Entergy Texas Inc.",1814 "7. Limestone","Coal","NRG Texas Power LLC",1689 "8. Fayette Power Project","Coal","Lower Colorado River Authority",1641 "9. Forney Energy Center","Gas","FPLE Forney LP",1640

67

SAS Output  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Average Sales Price of Coal by State, County, and Number of Mines, 2012" Average Sales Price of Coal by State, County, and Number of Mines, 2012" "Coal-Producing State and County","Number of Mines","Sales","Average Sales Price" ,,"(thousand short tons)","(dollars per short ton)" "Alabama",39,19021,106.57 " Bibb",1,"w","w" " Blount",2,"w","w" " Fayette",1,"w","w" " Franklin",1,"w","w" " Jackson",2,"w","w" " Jefferson",11,4298,146.04 " Marion",1,"w","w" " Tuscaloosa",7,8599,111.55 " Walker",11,2370,81.88

68

Combined cycle and waste heat recovery power systems based on a novel thermodynamic energy cycle utilizing low-temperature heat for power generation  

SciTech Connect

A new thermodynamic energy cycle has been developed, using a multicomponent working agent. Condensation is supplemented with absorption, following expansion in the turbine. Several combined power systems based on this cycle have been designed and cost-estimated. Efficiencies of these new systems are 1.35 to 1.5 times higher than the best Rankine Cycle system, at the same border conditions. Investment cost per unit of power output is about two-thirds of the cost of a comparable Rankine Cycle system. Results make cogeneration economically attractive at current energy prices. The first experimental installation is planned by Fayette Manufacturing Company and Detroit Diesel Allison Division of General Motors.

Kalina, A.I.

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

69

Data:2721ebf0-ef63-4cc2-9eaf-16c1fdd040fb | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

ebf0-ef63-4cc2-9eaf-16c1fdd040fb ebf0-ef63-4cc2-9eaf-16c1fdd040fb No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: City of LaFayette, Georgia (Utility Company) Effective date: 2013/04/08 End date if known: Rate name: Small General Service Sector: Commercial Description: Source or reference: https://cas.sharepoint.illinoisstate.edu/grants/Sunshot/Lists/DATA%20ENTRY%20Additional%20Information%20Obtained/Attachments/72/City%20of%20LaFayette%20GA%20rates.pdf Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months): Energy (kWh) Minimum (kWh): Maximum (kWh): History (months):

70

Data:Dde6ed62-e484-4ffc-a3dc-f6680a6b86c5 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Dde6ed62-e484-4ffc-a3dc-f6680a6b86c5 Dde6ed62-e484-4ffc-a3dc-f6680a6b86c5 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: City of LaFayette, Georgia (Utility Company) Effective date: 2013/04/08 End date if known: Rate name: Economic Development Rate - ED1 Sector: Description: Source or reference: https://cas.sharepoint.illinoisstate.edu/grants/Sunshot/Lists/DATA%20ENTRY%20Additional%20Information%20Obtained/Attachments/72/City%20of%20LaFayette%20GA%20rates.pdf Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months): Energy (kWh) Minimum (kWh): Maximum (kWh): History (months):

71

Evidence from the Natural Gas Industry  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

country. It was founded in 1969 through a grant from Oppenheimer & Company in honor of its late partner, Rodney L. White. The Center receives support from its endowment and from annual contributions from its Members. The Center sponsors a wide range of financial research. It publishes a working paper series and a reprint series. It holds an annual seminar, which for the last several years has focused on household financial decision making. The Members of the Center gain the opportunity to participate in innovative research to break new ground in the field of finance. Through their membership, they also gain access to the Wharton Schools faculty

Christopher C. Geczy; Bernadette A. Minton; Catherine Schrand

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

72

Step-by-Step Instructions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Indiana Indiana based upon the simple prescriptive option of the 2012 IECC. It does not provide a guarantee for meeting the IECC. This guide is not designed to reflect the actual energy code, with amendments, if any, adopted in Indiana and does not, therefore, provide a guarantee for meeting the state energy code. For details on the energy code adopted by Indiana, including how it may differ from the IECC, please contact your local building code official. Additional copies of this guide are available on www.reca-codes.com. CLIMATE ZONE 5 Adams Elkhart Jay Noble Tipton Allen Fayette Johnson Owen Union Bartholomew Fountain Kosciusko Parke Vermillion Benton Franklin La Porte Porter Vigo Blackford Fulton Lagrange Pulaski Wabash Boone Grant Lake Putnam Warren

73

Step-by-Step Instructions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ohio. The requirements Ohio. The requirements in the 2009 IECC are the same for windows used in new buildings, remodeling & additions to existing buildings, and as replacements of existing windows. Step-by-Step Instructions 1. Using the climate zone map or table, match the jurisdiction to the appropriate IECC climate zone. Use the "IECC Prescriptive Window Energy Efficiency Requirements" (on the back of this sheet) to determine the window performance requirements associated with the climate zone. 2. Construct the home with windows that have area weighted average U-factor and SHGC values less than or equal to the values for the climate zone and meet the code maximum air leakage requirements. IECC CLIMATE ZONE 5 Allen Fayette Lorain Preble Ashland Franklin Lucas Putnam

74

Step-by-Step Instructions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

West West Virginia based upon the simple prescriptive option of the 2012 IECC. It does not provide a guarantee for meeting the IECC. This guide is not designed to reflect the actual energy code, with amendments, if any, adopted in West Virginia and does not, therefore, provide a guarantee for meeting the state energy code. For details on the energy code adopted by West Virginia, including how it may differ from the IECC, please contact your local building code official. Additional copies of this guide are available on www.reca-codes.com. CLIMATE ZONE 5 Barbour Lewis Raleigh Brooke Marion Randolph Doddridge Marshall Summers Fayette Mineral Taylor Grant Monongalia Tucker Greenbrier Nicholas Upshur Hampshire Ohio Webster Hancock Pendleton Wetzel

75

Step-by-Step Instructions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Kentucky Kentucky based upon the simple prescriptive option of the 2012 IECC. It does not provide a guarantee for meeting the IECC. This guide is not designed to reflect the actual energy code, with amendments, if any, adopted in Kentucky and does not, therefore, provide a guarantee for meeting the state energy code. For details on the energy code adopted by Kentucky, including how it may differ from the IECC, please contact your local building code official. Additional copies of this guide are available on www.reca-codes.com. CLIMATE ZONE 4 Adair Edmonson Knox Nicholas Allen Elliott LaRue Ohio Anderson Estill Laurel Oldham Ballard Fayette Lawrence Owen Barren Fleming Lee Owsley Bath Floyd Leslie Pendleton Bell Franklin Letcher Perry Boone Fulton Lewis Pike

76

EA-1642: Design and Construction of an Early Lead Mini Fischer-Tropsch  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

42: Design and Construction of an Early Lead Mini 42: Design and Construction of an Early Lead Mini Fischer-Tropsch Refinery at the University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research Near Lexington, Kentucky EA-1642: Design and Construction of an Early Lead Mini Fischer-Tropsch Refinery at the University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research Near Lexington, Kentucky SUMMARY DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory prepared this environmental assessment to analyze the potential environmental impacts of providing funding for the proposed Early Lead Mini Fischer-Tropsch Refinery. The early lead facility would be located at the University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research in Fayette County Kentucky. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

77

Data:1a79e18a-cd6c-473c-9851-80eefe8e60e5 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

e18a-cd6c-473c-9851-80eefe8e60e5 e18a-cd6c-473c-9851-80eefe8e60e5 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: 2007/04/01 End date if known: Rate name: Electric Heat Rates Sector: Residential Description: Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

78

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: A11 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21, 2010 21, 2010 CX-003190: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cherokee Nation Businesses CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.1 Date: 07/21/2010 Location(s): Kay County, Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 20, 2010 CX-003605: Categorical Exclusion Determination Competitive Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Awards CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 07/20/2010 Location(s): Fayette County, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 20, 2010 CX-003603: Categorical Exclusion Determination Competitive Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Awards - Oregon Coast Regional Transit Program CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 07/20/2010 Location(s): Columbia County, Oregon Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

79

Data:D59705d8-229b-450b-a477-c2dbdef17ed2 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

705d8-229b-450b-a477-c2dbdef17ed2 705d8-229b-450b-a477-c2dbdef17ed2 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Small Commercial Sector: Commercial Description: Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

80

Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use July 27, 2010 - 1:00pm Addthis How does it work? Software tracks energy usage, greenhouse gas levels and analyzes utility bills. County could see savings and cost recoveries of $100,000 to $200,000. Information allows county to make energy usage changes and identify retrofit needs. For county officials conscious of energy efficiency, deciphering complex utility bills and identifying both municipal energy-use trends and potential savings opportunities can be complex without sophisticated software. "We knew we needed a better system," says James Bush, energy manager for Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky. Last month, the county invested $140,000 of a $2.7 million Energy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "atascosa wharton fayette" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Step-by-Step Instructions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Iowa based Iowa based upon the simple prescriptive option of the 2012 IECC. It does not provide a guarantee for meeting the IECC. This guide is not designed to reflect the actual energy code, with amendments, if any, adopted in Iowa and does not, therefore, provide a guarantee for meeting the state energy code. For details on the energy code adopted by Iowa, including how it may differ from the IECC, please contact your local building code official. Additional copies of this guide are available on www.reca-codes.com. CLIMATE ZONE 6 Allamakee Clay Hancock Palo Alto Black Hawk Clayton Hardin Plymouth Bremer Delaware Howard Pocahontas Buchanan Dickinson Humboldt Sac Buena Vista Emmet Ida Sioux Butler Fayette Kossuth Webster Calhoun Floyd Lyon Winnebago Cerro Gordo Franklin

82

T OF ENERG Y EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETE~llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTI\IEN DEPARTI\IEN T OF ENERG Y EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETE~llNATION RECIPIENT:lexington·Fayette Urnan County Govemment PROJECf TITLE: eeCBG Program Community Bike Project Page 1 of2 STATE: KY Funding Opportunity Announc:tment Number Proc:urtmtnt Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE· EEOOOO728.Q0 1 0 Bastd on my rtview of the information c:onc:erning the proposed ac:tion, as NEPA Complianc:e Offic:er (authorized under DOE Order 4SI.tA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B5.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

83

O R I G I N A L P A P E R Biolistic  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Biolistic Biolistic transformation of elite genotypes of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) Zachary R. King * Adam L. Bray * Peter R. LaFayette * Wayne A. Parrott Received: 14 July 2013 / Revised: 25 September 2013 / Accepted: 18 October 2013 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract Key message With a novel elite genotype, SA37, and an improved transformation protocol, it is now possible to routinely and efficiently engineer switchgrass using biolistic transformation. Abstract Transformation of elite switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) genotypes would facilitate the characterization of genes related to cell wall recalcitrance to saccharification. However, transformation of explants from switchgrass plants has remained difficult. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop a biolistic transformation protocol for elite genotypes. Three switchgrass genotypes

84

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Pennsylvania | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 20, 2010 July 20, 2010 CX-003605: Categorical Exclusion Determination Competitive Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Awards CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 07/20/2010 Location(s): Fayette County, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 14, 2010 CX-003121: Categorical Exclusion Determination Next-Generation Low-Cost Reflector CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/14/2010 Location(s): Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 12, 2010 CX-002980: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renewable Energy Certificate Program CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 07/12/2010 Location(s): St. Francis University, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

85

 

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

KY Kentucky Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations KY Kentucky Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations All $ 25,382,500 KY Kentucky State Energy Office $ 10,427,000 KY Bowling Green City $ 585,600 KY Covington City $ 188,500 KY Florence City $ 126,400 KY Frankfort City $ 132,100 KY Henderson City $ 123,100 KY Hopkinsville City $ 143,600 KY Lexington-Fayette City $ 2,753,800 KY Louisville/Jefferson City $ 7,000,400 KY Owensboro City $ 557,200 KY Richmond City $ 145,600 KY Boone County $ 368,100 KY Bullitt County $ 289,900 KY Campbell County $ 351,600 KY Hardin County $ 426,500 KY Kenton County $ 465,200

86

USE OF SLIMHOLE DRILLING TO REDUCE WELL COSTS 30-50%: ARNIM PROSPECT  

SciTech Connect

This report highlights the drilling of two shallow oil wells in Fayette County, Texas. The operator of these two wells was Stanton Mineral Development, Inc. The aim of this project was to successfully complete the two (2) wells, emphasizing tight oversight of the technological aspects, neglect of which are the primary causes of failure in this mature producing region as well as unnecessarily expensive wells. Discussions contained here within are not limited to just the execution of the project itself, but a historical and technical analysis which forms a basis for the decisions made both during drilling and completion. Additionally, there is substantial dialogue covering the financial benefits associated with the findings of this project.

WM. Stanton McDonald; Christopher M. Long

2002-06-13T23:59:59.000Z

87

Extra cogeneration step seen boosting output 20%  

SciTech Connect

Cogenerators can now buy a prototype 6.5 MW, pre-packaged cogeneration system that incorporates an added step to its cycle to reduce fuel use by 21%. Larger, custom-designed systems will be on the market in 1985. Fayette Manufacturing Co. will offer the Kalina Cycle system at a discount price of $8.2 million (1200/kW) until the systems are competitive with conventional units. The system varies from conventional cogeneration systems by adding a distillation step, which permits the use of two fluids for the turbine steam and operates at a higher thermodynamic efficiency, with boiling occuring at high temperature and low pressure. Although theoretically correct, DOE will withhold judgment on the system's efficiency until the first installation is operating.

Burton, P.

1984-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

88

W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project, Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0473)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

W.A. W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture and Sequestration Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Summary February 2013 DOE/EIS-0473 Office of Fossil Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COVER SHEET Responsible Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Title: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture and Sequestration Project, Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0473) Location: Southeastern Texas, including Fort Bend, Wharton, and Jackson counties Contacts: For further information about this Environmental Impact Statement, contact: For general information on the DOE process for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act, contact: Mark W. Lusk U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory 3610 Collins Ferry Road Morgantown, WV 26507-0880 (304) 285-4145 or Mark.Lusk@netl.doe.gov

89

EIS-0473-DEIS-Summary-2012.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture and Sequestration Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement Summary September 2012 DOE/EIS-0473D Office of Fossil Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COVER SHEET Responsible Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Title: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture and Sequestration Project, Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0473D) Location: Southeastern Texas, including Fort Bend, Wharton, and Jackson Counties Contacts: For further information about this Environmental Impact Statement, contact: For general information on the DOE process for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act, contact: Mark W. Lusk U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory

90

An applied paleoecology case study: Bahia Grande, Texas prior to construction of the Brownsville Ship Channel  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Bahia Grande is a large lagoon located within Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge in Cameron County, Texas. When the Brownsville Ship Channel was built along the southern end of the lagoon in 1936, Bahia Grande was cut off from the marine water of Laguna Madre. Since that time, Bahia Grande has been primarily dry with only ephemeral fresh water coming from heavy rainfall events, resulting in a severe decline in biological productivity. A restoration project led by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed to cut new channels between Bahia Grande and the Ship Channel to restore the connection with Laguna Madre. This is a large-scale project with major implications for the water quality, surrounding ecology, and associated biota in the region. Unfortunately, because very little is known about Bahia Grande prior to isolation, it is difficult to predict whether the results of the restoration will be comparable to the pre-Ship Channel environment. Paleoecological data provide the best opportunity to understand what Bahia Grande was like in the past. This study uses statistical analyses of the molluscan death assemblages from Bahia Grande to gain a better understanding of the environmental conditions in the lagoon before it was isolated. The first question addressed is how does Bahia Grande relate to other water bodies on the Texas coast? This may provide a modern analog to the past conditions in Bahia Grande. The second question inquires whether there are any local patterns or variations within Bahia Grande and several smaller surrounding lagoons. These results provide an important baseline for comparison with the restored lagoon. The results of this investigation show that, in a regional context, Bahia Grande was most similar to Alazan Bay and Baffin Bay, which are mostly enclosed shallow bays with high salinities due to the arid climate and limited freshwater inflow. Within Bahia Grande, there are several distinct molluscan assemblages. Salinity and water coverage are the most likely environmental factors responsible for the differences within Bahia Grande. Additionally, data from surrounding lagoons strongly indicate that some connections with Bahia Grande existed in the past.

Lichlyter, Stephen Alvah

2003-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

Foraging ecology of wintering wading birds along the Gulf of Mexico coast  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

I studied flock composition, distribution and foraging ecology of wintering wading birds along the Gulf of Mexico coast. I focused on geographic variability in wintering wading bird assemblages, the processes that structured these assemblages and habitat use by wading birds. I found considerable variation among three sites, Aransas National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), Texas; Marsh Island Wildlife Refuge (MIWR), Louisiana; and Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge (CNWR), Florida. Species comprising wintering wading bird assemblages varied regionally. ANWR had the most species-rich assemblage, with eight species. MIWR had only six wading bird species. And CNWR had only three different species. Processes that structured wintering wading bird assemblages also varied regionally. In ANWR, Texas, the Random Fraction niche apportionment model (RF model) best explained the empirical abundance data for ANWR. For abundance data from MIWR a good fit was obtained with the MacArthur Fraction (MF) model and the Power Fraction (PF) models. None of the models fully explained the CNWR abundance data. I also examined patterns of habitat partitioning among wintering wading birds at three different scales at two sites, Matagorda Island National Wildlife Refuge (MINWR) and Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge (LANWR). At the macrohabitat level, wintering wading birds showed interspecific differences in macrohabitat use of both open water habitats and vegetated flats. At the mesohabitat level all species at MINWR used the category nearest the edge most often, alternatively, at LANWR wading birds were most often in the mesohabitat category of 8.1- 12 m. from the edge. In both locations wading birds partitioned habitat based on water depth. Finally, I found that Great Egrets and Snowy Egrets participated more often in flock foraging and derived more benefits from feeding in flocks than other species. Great Egrets feeding in flocks had a higher mean strike rate than those foraging alone, whereas Snowy Egrets had a higher success rate foraging in flocks than those foraging alone. In the case of the darkercolored species (e.g., Great Blue Herons, etc.) they either showed no difference in behaviors between birds foraging in flocks versus those foraging alone or they actually did worse when they foraged in flocks.

Sherry, Dawn Ann

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

1472-6750-11-74[1].pdf  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Switchgrass Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) ubiquitin gene (PvUbi1 and PvUbi2) promoters for use in plant transformation BMC Biotechnology 2011, 11:74 doi:10.1186/1472-6750-11-74 David GJ Mann (dmann1@utk.edu) Zachary R King (zrking@uga.edu) Wusheng Liu (wliu2@utk.edu) Blake L Joyce (bjoyce3@utk.edu) Ryan J Percifield (ryanpercifield@gmail.com) Jennifer S Hawkins (jenshawkins@gmail.com) Peter R LaFayette (plaf@uga.edu) Barbara J Artelt (bartelt@uga.edu) Jason N Burris (jburris1@utk.edu) Mitra Mazarei (mmazarei@utk.edu) Jeffrey L Bennetzen (maize@uga.edu) Wayne A Parrott (wparrott@uga.edu) C Neal Stewart Jr (nealstewart@utk.edu) ISSN 1472-6750 Article type Research article Submission date 20 April 2011 Acceptance date 11 July 2011 Publication date 11 July 2011 Article URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/11/74 Like all articles in BMC journals,

93

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FE0000699 FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE 315 10 Donald Krastman 5/1/10 -10/1/12 Lexington, Fayette County, KY CAVITATION PRETREATMENT OF A FLOTATION FEEDSTOCK FOR ENHANCED COAL RECOVERY A test program is proposed to evaluate and quantify the technical feasibility and economic benefits of using a cavitation system to pre-aerate flotation feed for conventional flotation cells and flotation 05 12 2010 Donald Krastman Digitally signed by Donald Krastman DN: cn=Donald Krastman, o=NETL, ou=315, email=krastman@netl.doe.gov, c=US Reason: I am approving this document Date: 2010.05.12 15:06:30 -04'00' 05 19 2010 john ganz Digitally signed by john ganz DN: cn=john ganz, o=NETL- DOE, ou=140 OPFC, email=john.ganz@netl.doe.gov, c=US Date: 2010.05.19 09:16:52 -04'00' This CX is approved for University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY bench-scale laboratory testing only.

94

Gatewaycompatible vectors for highthroughput gene functional analysis in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and other monocot species  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Gateway-compatible Gateway-compatible vectors for high-throughput gene functional analysis in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and other monocot species David G.J. Mann 1,5,†* , Peter R. LaFayette 2,3,5 , Laura L. Abercrombie 1,5 , Zachary R. King 3,5 , Mitra Mazarei 1,5 , Mathew C. Halter 1 , Charleson R. Poovaiah 1,5 , Holly Baxter 1,5 , Hui Shen 4,5 , Richard A. Dixon 4,5 , Wayne A. Parrott 2,3,5 and C. Neal Stewart Jr 1,5 1 Department of Plant Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA 2 Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA 3 Institute for Plant Breeding, Genetics & Genomics, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA 4 Plant Biology Division, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK, USA 5 The BioEnergy Science Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA Received 31 May 2011; revised 12 June 2011; accepted 10 August 2011.

95

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Coal Report 2012  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Average Sales Price of Coal by State, County, and Number of Mines, 2012 Average Sales Price of Coal by State, County, and Number of Mines, 2012 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Coal Report 2012 Table 30. Average Sales Price of Coal by State, County, and Number of Mines, 2012 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Coal Report 2012 Coal-Producing State and County Number of Mines Sales (thousand short tons) Average Sales Price (dollars per short ton) Alabama 39 19,021 106.57 Bibb 1 w w Blount 2 w w Fayette 1 w w Franklin 1 w w Jackson 2 w w Jefferson 11 4,298 146.04 Marion 1 w w Tuscaloosa 7 8,599 111.55 Walker 11 2,370 81.88 Winston 2 w w Alaska 1 w w Yukon-Koyukuk 1 w w Arizona 1 w w Navajo 1 w w Arkansas 1 w w Sebastian 1 w w Colorado 12 28,856 37.54 Delta 1 w w Gunnison 2 w w La Plata

96

LAKESHORE AVON BR ANT-EDEN ALD EN-LANC ASTER AU BURN W SH ELDON  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

81 81 § ¨ ¦ 81 LAKESHORE AVON BR ANT-EDEN ALD EN-LANC ASTER AU BURN W SH ELDON CALEDONIA HURON C REEK LEIC EST ER COL DEN ASH FORD INDIAN FALLS LAWTONS SAR DINIA RPD-037 -2 GLENWOOD PU LASKI PAVILION CON CORD COL LINS N ELM A ORC HARD PARK-H AMBU RG DANLEY CORNERS ST ILLWAT ER CHAFF EE-ARCAD E FAYETT E-WATERLOO LAKEVIEW JAVA SEN EC A W ELLER Y AU RORA E ZOAR BU FFALO TIOGA SILVER LAKE AKR ON ROM E RAT HBON E ALM A BET HANY WYOMING ULYSSES BR ANCH W SAN DY CREEK COL LINS BLOOMFIELD E LEBANON STATE LINE ALLEN CHUR CHVILLE BATH ATT ICA ELLI COT VILLE ROU LETT E BR ADFORD BU FFALO CREEK PEN N YAN N BEECH HILL-INDEPENDENC E GERRY-CH ARLOTTE STAGECOACH CHIPMUN K HEBRON VIN CENT BALD WI NSVILLE AKELEY OLEAN COWLESVILLE AN NIN SMET HPORT BR ADLEY BR OOK BU STI FIVE MILE BLOOMFIELD W SEN EC A FALLS NILE STAGECOACH LEWIS R UN BR ADFORD CAMDEN VAN ETT EN ROAN OKE SH ARON RICHBU RG FULTON N FINN EGAN H ILL TONAWANDA

97

Data:550854e5-5f2d-4c68-9b34-7da6a9a2fc1e | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4e5-5f2d-4c68-9b34-7da6a9a2fc1e 4e5-5f2d-4c68-9b34-7da6a9a2fc1e No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: 2007/04/01 End date if known: Rate name: Residential Sector: Residential Description: Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

98

Data:0e80b50c-faab-40da-9338-d6078a1bb0d4 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

0c-faab-40da-9338-d6078a1bb0d4 0c-faab-40da-9338-d6078a1bb0d4 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Large Commercial Sector: Commercial Description: Rate Structure: Service charge: $45 First 10,000 kWh/mo. 12.80¢/kWh Over 10,000 kWh/mo. 10.60¢/kWh All consumption in excess of 200kWh per kW of demand, which is also in excess of 1,000 kWh 4.20¢/kWh All consumption in excess of 400 kWh per kW of demand, which is also in excess of 1,000 kWh 3.70¢/kWh Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

99

Pontotoc Co. Greene Co. Hale Co. OAK GROVE C OAL D EGAS CEDAR COVE  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

COAL D EGAS BLU E CREEK COAL DEGAS BR OOKWOOD C OAL D EGAS ST AR ROBIN SONS BEND COAL D EGAS BLU FF COR INNE MOU NDVILLE COAL D EGAS BLU EGU T CR EEK WH ITE OAK CREEK COAL DEGAS BEAVERT ON BLU FF FAYETTE W SN EAD S CREEK SPLU NGE PAR HAM N MUSGR OVE CR EEK MCCRAC KEN MOU NTAIN DAVIS C HAPEL BAC ON BLOOMING GROVE MT Z ION FAIRVIEW JASPER BLOWHORN CREEK MAPLE BRAN CH KEN NEDY COAL F IRE CR EEK MCGEE LAKE SILOAM MILLPOR T FERNBANK DAVIS C HAPEL NE DETROIT E BEANS F ERRY LEXIN GT ON PET ERSON COAL D EGAS CALEDONIA ABERD EEN HOL T COAL D EGAS MULDON ELD RIDGE MCKINLEY CREEK TREBLOC HEARTLIN E SH ANNON TROY_MS_D BOXES CREEK WISE GAP NOR THSID E TREMONT VAN VLEET HOL LY BET HEL CHU RCH ABERD EEN S ST RONG BAN KST ON MOLLOY WR EN COR INTH WELLS THORN REID REID HOU STON ST AR DEERLICK CREEK COAL D EGAS OAK GROVE COAL D EGAS BIG SANDY CREEK COAL D EGAS MABEN LITT LE SAND Y CREEK COAL D

100

Data:5c83babc-c230-4d9d-86fc-3222d1b48c58 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3babc-c230-4d9d-86fc-3222d1b48c58 3babc-c230-4d9d-86fc-3222d1b48c58 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: 2007/04/01 End date if known: Rate name: Additional Residential Meter Option Sector: Residential Description: Additional Info: The second meter option is for members that have a shop, garage, barn, well pump or some other meter on their property that uses less than 500 kWh per month. The given charges are subject to "Wholesale Power Cost Adjustment". Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "atascosa wharton fayette" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Pontotoc Co. Greene Co. Hale Co. OAK GROVE C OAL D EGAS CEDAR COVE COAL DEGAS  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

COAL DEGAS COAL DEGAS BLU E CREEK COAL DEGAS BR OOKWOOD C OAL D EGAS ST AR ROBIN SONS BEND COAL DEGAS BLU FF COR INNE MOU NDVILLE COAL DEGAS BLU EGU T CR EEK WH ITE OAK CREEK COAL DEGAS BEAVERT ON BLU FF FAYETTE W SN EAD S CREEK SPLU NGE PAR HAM N MUSGR OVE CR EEK MCCRAC KEN MOU NTAIN DAVIS C HAPEL BAC ON BLOOMING GROVE MT Z ION FAIRVIEW JASPER BLOWHORN CREEK MAPLE BRAN CH KEN NEDY COAL F IRE CR EEK MCGEE LAKE SILOAM MILLPOR T FERNBANK DAVIS C HAPEL NE DETROIT E BEANS F ERRY LEXIN GT ON PET ERSON COAL DEGAS CALEDONIA ABERD EEN HOL T COAL DEGAS MULDON ELD RIDGE MCKINLEY CREEK TREBLOC HEARTLIN E SH ANNON TROY_MS_D BOXES CREEK WISE GAP NOR THSID E TREMONT VAN VLEET HOL LY BET HEL CHU RCH ABERD EEN S ST RONG BAN KST ON MOLLOY WR EN COR INT H WELLS THORN REID REID HOU STON ST AR DEERLICK CR EEK C OAL DEGAS OAK GROVE C OAL D EGAS BIG SANDY C REEK COAL D EGAS MABEN LITT LE SAND Y CREEK COAL DEGAS

102

Data:A015c265-9a9d-4143-99f3-f80f1f306fd8 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

A015c265-9a9d-4143-99f3-f80f1f306fd8 A015c265-9a9d-4143-99f3-f80f1f306fd8 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: 2007/04/01 End date if known: Rate name: Residential Time-Of-Use Sector: Residential Description: Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

103

Data:960599e9-2a81-459a-99a9-6f93f3da58c9 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

60599e9-2a81-459a-99a9-6f93f3da58c9 60599e9-2a81-459a-99a9-6f93f3da58c9 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Outdoor Lighting Traditionaire 150 W Sector: Lighting Description: Source or reference: http://www.utility.org/otherServices/securityLighting.aspx Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months): Energy (kWh) Minimum (kWh): Maximum (kWh): History (months): Service Voltage Minimum (V): Maximum (V): Character of Service Voltage Category: Phase Wiring: << Previous 1 2

104

Biomass power for rural development. Technical progress report, January 1, 1997--March 31, 1997  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Detailed task progress reports and schedules are provided for the DOE/USDA sponsored Biomass Power for Rural Development project. The focus of the project is on developing commercial energy crops for power generation by the year 2000. The New York based Salix Consortium project is a multi-partner endeavor, implemented in three stages. Phase-1, Final Design and Project Development, will conclude with the preparation of construction and/or operating permits, feedstock production plans, and contracts ready for signature. Field trials of willow (Salix) have been initiated at several locations in New York (Tully, Lockport, King Ferry, La Fayette, Massena, and Himrod) and co-firing tests are underway at Greenidge Station (NYSEG) and Dunkirk Station (NMPC). Phase-II of the project will focus on scale-up of willow crop acreage, construction of co-firing facilities at Dunkirk Station (NMPC), and final modifications for Greenidge Station. Cofiring willow is also under consideration for GPU`s Seward Station where testing is under way. There will be an evaluation of the energy crop as part of the gasification trials occurring at BED`s McNeill power station. Phase-III will represent fullscale commercialization of the energy crop and power generation on a sustainable basis.

Neuhauser, E.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

105

Biomass power for rural development. Technical progress report, April 1, 1997--June 30, 1997  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Detailed task progress reports and schedules are provided for the DOE/USDA sponsored Biomass Power for Rural Development project. The focus of the project is on developing commercial energy crops for power generation by the year 2000. The New York based Salix Consortium project is a multi-partner endeavor, implemented in three stages. Phase-I, Final Design and Project Development, will conclude with the preparation of construction and/or operating permits, feedstock production plans, and contracts ready for signature. Field trials of willow (Salix) have been initiated at several locations in New York (Tully, Lockport, King Ferry, La Fayette, Massena, and Himrod) and co-firing tests are underway at Greenidge Station (NYSEG) and Dunkirk Station (NMPC). Phase-H of the project will focus on scale-up of willow crop acreage, construction of co-firing facilities at Dunkirk Station (NMPC), and final modifications for Greenidge Station. Cofiring willow is also under consideration for GPU`s Seward Station where testing is under way. There will be an evaluation of the energy crop as part of the gasification trials occurring at BED`s McNeill power station. Phase-III will represent fullscale commercialization of the energy crop and power generation on a sustainable basis.

Neuhauser, E.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

Biomass power for rural development. Technical progress report, October 1--December 31, 1997  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The focus of the DOE/USDA sponsored biomass power for rural development project is to develop commercial energy crops for power generation by the year 2000. The New York based Salix Consortium project is a multi-partner endeavor, implemented in three stages. Phase-1, Final Design and Project Development, will conclude with the preparation of construction and/or operating permits, feedstock production plans, and contracts ready for signature. Field trials of willow (Salix) have been initiated at several locations in New York (Tully, Lockport, King Ferry, La Fayette, Massena, and Himrod) and co-firing tests are underway at Greenidge Station (NYSEG) and Dunkirk Station (NMPC). Phase-2 of the project will focus on scale-up of willow crop acreage, construction of co-firing facilities at Dunkirk Station (NMPC), and final modifications for Greenidge Station. Cofiring willow is also under consideration for GPU`s Seward Station where testing is underway. There will be an evaluation of the energy crop as part of the gasification trials occurring at BED`s McNeill Power Station. Phase-3 will represent fullscale commercialization of the energy crop and power generation on a sustainable basis. During the fourth quarter of 1997 the Consortium submitted a Phase-2 proposal. A few of the other more important milestones are outlined below. The first quarter of 1998 will be dominated by pre-planting activity in the spring.

Neuhauser, E.

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

Economic feasibility of ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice in Texas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Environmental and political concerns centered on energy use from gasoline have led to a great deal of research on ethanol production. The goal of this thesis is to determine if it is profitable to produce ethanol in Texas using sweet sorghum juice. Four different areas, Moore, Hill, Willacy, and Wharton Counties, using two feedstock alternatives, sweet sorghum only and sweet sorghum and corn, will be analyzed using Monte Carlo simulation to determine the probability of economic success. Economic returns to the farmers in the form of a contract price for the average sweet sorghum yield per acre in each study area and to the ethanol plant buying sweet sorghum at the contract price will be simulated and ranked. The calculated sweet sorghum contract prices offered to farmers are $9.94, $11.44, $29.98, and $36.21 per ton in Wharton, Willacy, Moore, and Hill Counties, respectively. The contract prices are equal to the next most profitable crop returns or ten percent more than the total cost to produce sweet sorghum in the study area. The wide variation in the price is due to competing crop returns and the sweet sorghum growing season. Ethanol production using sweet sorghum and corn is the most profitable alternative analyzed for an ethanol plant. A Moore County ethanol plant has the highest average net present value of $492.39 million and is most preferred overall when using sweet sorghum and corn to produce ethanol. Sweet sorghum ethanol production is most profitable in Willacy County but is not economically successful with an average net present value of $-11.06 million. Ethanol production in Hill County is least preferred with an average net present value of $-712.00 and $48.40 million when using sweet sorghum only and sweet sorghum and corn, respectively. Producing unsubsidized ethanol from sweet sorghum juice alone is not profitable in Texas. Sweet sorghum ethanol supplemented by grain is more economical but would not be as profitable as producing ethanol from only grain in the Texas Panhandle. Farmers profit on average from contract prices for sweet sorghum when prices cover total production costs for the crop.

Morris, Brittany Danielle

2008-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

Banks as Secret Keepers ?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Banks are optimally opaque institutions. They produce debt for use as a transaction medium (bank money), which requires that information about the backing assets not be revealed, so that bank money does not fluctuate in value, reducing its efficiency in trade. This need for opacity conflicts with the production of information about investment projects, necessary for allocative efficiency. How can information be produced and not revealed? Financial intermediaries exist to hide such information; they are created and structured to keep secrets. For the economy as a whole, this can be accomplished by a separation in how firms finance themselves; they divide into bank finance and capital market/stock market finance based on how well they can be used to maintain information away from liquidity markets. Firms with large projects, risky projects or projects easy to evaluate are less likely to be financed by banks. We thank Michael Woodford and seminar participants at Columbia, MIT, Rutgers, Universite de Montreal, Wharton and the SED Meetings at Cyprus for useful comments. The usual waiver of liability applies.

Tri Vi

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

Small boiler uses waste coal  

SciTech Connect

Burning coal waste in small boilers at low emissions poses considerable problem. While larger boiler suppliers have successfully installed designs in the 40 to 80 MW range for some years, the author has been developing small automated fluid bed boiler plants for 25 years that can be applied in the range of 10,000 to 140,000 lbs/hr of steam. Development has centered on the use of an internally circulating fluid bed (CFB) boiler, which will burn waste fuels of most types. The boiler is based on the traditional D-shaped watertable boiler, with a new type of combustion chamber that enables a three-to-one turndown to be achieved. The boilers have all the advantages of low emissions of the large fluid boilers while offering a much lower height incorporated into the package boiler concept. Recent tests with a waste coal that had a high nitrogen content of 1.45% demonstrated a NOx emission below the federal limit of 0.6 lbs/mm Btu. Thus a NOx reduction on the order of 85% can be demonstrate by combustion modification alone. Further reductions can be made by using a selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) system and sulfur absorption of up to 90% retention is possible. The article describes the operation of a 30,000 lbs/hr boiler at the Fayette Thermal LLC plant. Spinheat has installed three ICFB boilers at a nursing home and a prison, which has been tested on poor-grade anthracite and bituminous coal. 2 figs.

Virr, M.J. [Spinheat Ltd. (United States)

2009-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

110

Energy technologies advancement program underway  

SciTech Connect

The State of California is reducing the risk of developing new, innovative energy technologies under its Energy Technologies Advancement Program (ETAP), which is administered by the California Energy Commission (CEC). In the first funding round, 38 applications were received, and the Energy Commission's Research, Development, and Demonstration Committee has recommended six projects from private companies for initial funding. They are: ARCO Solar Inc. - research for $925,000 to develop thin film photovoltaic modules that capture the sun's rays and convert them into electricity; Alternative Energy Institute - research for $135,000 to collect and concentrate sunlight via a series of tracking parabolic dishes (heliostats), and transfer collected light into the interior of a commercial building; Solar Turbines Inc. - research for $52,500 to test a liquid fuel injection system that results in a reduction of oxides of nitrogen in cogeneration gas turbines; Pacific Gas and Electric Company - research for $500,000 to establish a program for field testing and evaluating emerging new photovoltaic technologies; San Diego Gas and Electric Company - research contract to test and evaluate the largest geothermal power plant in the world using an organic rankine cycle steam turbine, which uses a fluid with a lower-than-normal boiling point, thereby potentially generating electricity with lower temperature heat; and Fayette Manufacturing Corporation - loan contract for $1,250,000 to demonstrate the technical and economic feasibility of a new heat cycle process called the Kalina Cycle. The CEC will soon be releasing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for both private and public organizations for the second-round ETAP solicitation.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Biomass power for rural development. Technical progress report, July 1--September 30, 1997  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The focus of the DOE/USDA sponsored biomass power for rural development project is to develop commercial energy crops for power generation by the year 2000. The New York based Salix Consortium project is a multi-partner endeavor, implemented in three stages. Phase-1, Final Design and Project Development, will conclude with the preparation of construction and/or operating permits, feedstock production plans, and contracts ready for signature. Field trials of willow (Salix) have been initiated at several locations in New York (Tully, Lockport, King Ferry, La Fayette, Massena, and Himrod) and co-firing tests are underway at Greenidge Station (NYSEG) and Dunkirk Station (NMPC). Phase-2 of the project will focus on scale-up of willow crop acreage, construction of co-firing facilities at Dunkirk Station (NMPC), and final modifications for Greenidge Station. Cofiring willow is also under consideration for GPU`s Seward Station where testing is underway. There will be an evaluation of the energy crop as part of the gasification trials occurring at BED`s McNeill power station. Phase-3 will represent fullscale commercialization of the energy crop and power generation on a sustainable basis. During the third quarter of 1997, much of the Consortium`s effort has focused on outreach activities, continued feedstock development, fuel supply planning, and fuel contract development, and preparation for 1998 scale-up activities. The Consortium also submitted a Phase-1 extension proposal during this period. A few of the more important milestones are outlined below. The fourth quarter of 1997 is expected to be dominated by Phase-II proposal efforts and planning for 1998 activities.

Neuhauser, E.

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

The Demand for Homeowners Insurance with Bundled Catastrophe Coverages *  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this paper we estimate demand for homeowner insurance in Florida. Since we are interested in a number of factors influencing demand, we approach the problem from two directions. Using 3SLS estimation, we first estimate two hedonic equations representing the price mark-up and the level of premiums per contract. We are interested in how the contracts are bundled and how the various terms influence the price mark-up and the overall level of premiums. Second, we estimate the demand for homeowners insurance using the ISO's indicated loss cost as our proxy forreal insurance services demanded. We assume that the demand for coverage is essentially a joint demand and thus we can estimate the demand for cat cover separately from the demand for non-cat cover. Two notable results are that cat coverage is more price sensitive than non-cat coverage and that cat coverage is an inferior good. This research is supported by the Wharton Project on Managing Catastrophic Risks. This paper will contribute to a report that will be jointly written and published by the Insurance Services Office (ISO) and the authors. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of ISO in providing much of the data used in this analysis and of the companies who have allowed their exposure data to be used for this research project. The efforts of Michael Murray of ISO deserve particular recognition. James Ament, Howard Kunreuther, Neil Doherty, Michael Murray and Steven Nivin provided helpful comments on an earlier draft. This paper is still preliminary and many revisions still remain to be made. The Demand for Catastrophe Insurance with Bundled Catastrophic Coverages

Martin F. Grace; Robert W. Klein; Paul R. Kleindorfer

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Analysis of alternative-fuel price trajectories  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Findings are presented from a study to (1) acquire, analyze, and report alternative published price projections including both oil- and coal-price trajectories, and to (2) apply the fixed-annuity formula to the updated primary source projections (Energy Information Administration; Data Resources, Inc.; and Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates, Inc.) and to the newly acquired price projections. This report also encompasses: comparisons of key assumptions underlying the price projections, and a discussion of the applicability of the fixed-annuity formula as used in the alternative-cost calculation. Section II contains graphic presentations of all updated and newly acquired coal and oil price forecasts and the corresponding calculated annuity equivalents, tabulated presentations and discussions of each forecast and underlying assumptions, and a description of how each forecast price series was transformed into input for the present-value formulas. Section III presents the fixed-annuity formula employed and discusses its appropriateness for this application. Section IV discusses the applicability of the net present value approach for comparing alternate-fuel price trajectories. Appendix A contains a listing of contacts as potential sources of price forecasts. Appendix B contains the raw forecast data from each forecast source and the coal and oil price series derived from the raw data which were actually input into the cost calculation procedure. Appendix C contains a description and listing of the computer program developed to implement the cost calculation procedure. Finally, Appendix D contains tabulations and discussions of other alternative world crude price forecasts that were identified, but for which no corresponding coal-price projections were available. (MCW)

Not Available

1980-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

114

Faculty, Staff, and Student Cooperators About Our Cover Spigelia marilandica, Indian Pink, is an  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

in southern Kentucky (Wharton and Barbour 1971), it is found as a roadside plant on a variety of soil types. Over its rangeFlorida into east Texas, southeast Oklahoma, southwest Indiana, northwest Georgia, and east South Carolinait is common (Duncan and Duncan 1999). The red tubular flowers with five folded lobes showing the yellow interior color are stunning; they stop people dead in their tracks (Armitage 1997). An average of 13 (8-17 on 68 stems on a five-yearold division) of the 2-inch (5-cm) upright flowers are found on a one-sided cyme. The glossy ovate, opposite, sessile leaves add to the attractive appearance of the plant. West Kentucky plants grow 18-24 inches (46-61 cm) tall in sun or shade landscape environments. The bloom period starts in late May and continues through June; occasionally scattered blooms will occur in the fall. Rick Darke (2002) says they will re-bloom heavily if cut back after June flowering. Individual plants in the University of Kentucky Research and Education Center Botanical Garden, Princeton, KY are now seven years old and show signs of indefinite longevity. Spigelia marilandica is known to attract hummingbirds (Cullina 2000; Glick 2002). This characteristic, added to the beauty of the flowers, the size of the plant, its environmental and pest tolerances, and longevity in the landscape, indicate Spigelia marilandica is an plant that should be more widely used in landscapesin particular, Kentucky landscapes. A quick search of catalogs and nursery contacts indicate that the plant is much more available than in the past thanks to tissue culture propagation. Spigelia marilandica won Kentuckys 2010 Theodore Klein Plant Award (go to

unknown authors

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Full-Scale Testing of a Mercury Oxidation Catalyst Upstream of a Wet FGD System  

SciTech Connect

This document presents and discusses results from Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-06NT42778, 'Full-scale Testing of a Mercury Oxidation Catalyst Upstream of a Wet FGD System,' which was conducted over the time-period July 24, 2006 through June 30, 2010. The objective of the project was to demonstrate at full scale the use of solid honeycomb catalysts to promote the oxidation of elemental mercury in pulverized-coal-fired flue gas. Oxidized mercury is removed downstream in wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) absorbers and collected with the byproducts from the FGD system. The project was co-funded by EPRI, the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA), who also provided the host site, Great River Energy, Johnson Matthey, Southern Company, Salt River Project (SRP), the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), NRG Energy, Ontario Power and Westar. URS Group was the prime contractor and also provided cofunding. The scope of this project included installing and testing a gold-based catalyst upstream of one full-scale wet FGD absorber module (about 200-MW scale) at LCRA's Fayette Power Project (FPP) Unit 3, which fires Powder River Basin coal. Installation of the catalyst involved modifying the ductwork upstream of one of three wet FGD absorbers on Unit 3, Absorber C. The FGD system uses limestone reagent, operates with forced sulfite oxidation, and normally runs with two FGD modules in service and one spare. The full-scale catalyst test was planned for 24 months to provide catalyst life data. Over the test period, data were collected on catalyst pressure drop, elemental mercury oxidation across the catalyst module, and mercury capture by the downstream wet FGD absorber. The demonstration period began on May 6, 2008 with plans for the catalyst to remain in service until May 5, 2010. However, because of continual increases in pressure drop across the catalyst and concerns that further increases would adversely affect Unit 3 operations, LCRA decided to end the demonstration early, during a planned unit outage. On October 2, 2009, Unit 3 was taken out of service for a fall outage and the catalyst upstream of Absorber C was removed. This ended the demonstration after approximately 17 months of the planned 24 months of operation. This report discusses reasons for the pressure drop increase and potential measures to mitigate such problems in any future application of this technology. Mercury oxidation and capture measurements were made on Unit 3 four times during the 17-month demonstration. Measurements were performed across the catalyst and Absorber C and 'baseline' measurements were performed across Absorber A or B, which did not have a catalyst upstream. Results are presented in the report from all four sets of measurements during the demonstration period. These results include elemental mercury oxidation across the catalyst, mercury capture across Absorber C downstream of the catalyst, baseline mercury capture across Absorber A or B, and mercury re-emissions across both absorbers in service. Also presented in the report are estimates of the average mercury control performance of the oxidation catalyst technology over the 17-month demonstration period and the resulting mercury control costs.

Gary Blythe; Jennifer Paradis

2010-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

116

Advanced Liquid Natural Gas Onboard Storage System  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Cummins Westport Incorporated (CWI) has designed and developed a liquefied natural gas (LNG) vehicle fuel system that includes a reciprocating pump with the cold end submerged in LNG contained in a vacuum-jacketed tank. This system was tested and analyzed under the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced LNG Onboard Storage System (ALOSS) program. The pumped LNG fuel system developed by CWI and tested under the ALOSS program is a high-pressure system designed for application on Class 8 trucks powered by CWI's ISX G engine, which employs high-pressure direct injection (HPDI) technology. A general ALOSS program objective was to demonstrate the feasibility and advantages of a pumped LNG fuel system relative to on-vehicle fuel systems that require the LNG to be ''conditioned'' to saturation pressures that exceeds the engine fuel pressure requirements. These advantages include the capability to store more fuel mass in given-size vehicle and station tanks, and simpler lower-cost LNG refueling stations that do not require conditioning equipment. Pumped LNG vehicle fuel systems are an alternative to conditioned LNG systems for spark-ignition natural gas and port-injection dual-fuel engines (which typically require about 100 psi), and they are required for HPDI engines (which require over 3,000 psi). The ALOSS program demonstrated the feasibility of a pumped LNG vehicle fuel system and the advantages of this design relative to systems that require conditioning the LNG to a saturation pressure exceeding the engine fuel pressure requirement. LNG tanks mounted on test carts and the CWI engineering truck were repeatedly filled with LNG saturated at 20 to 30 psig. More fuel mass was stored in the vehicle tanks as well as the station tank, and no conditioning equipment was required at the fueling station. The ALOSS program also demonstrated the general viability and specific performance of the CWI pumped LNG fuel system design. The system tested as part of this program is designed to be used on Class 8 trucks with CWI ISX G HPDI engines. Extensive test cart and engineering truck tests of the pump demonstrated good durability and the high-pressure performance needed for HPDI application. The LNG tanks manufactured by Taylor-Wharton passed SAE J2343 Recommended Practice drop tests and accelerated road-load vibration tests. NER and hold-time tests produced highly consistent results. Additional tests confirmed the design adequacy of the liquid level sensor, vaporizer, ullage volume, and other fuel system components. While the testing work performed under this program focused on a high-pressure pumped LNG fuel system design, the results also validate the feasibility of a low-pressure pumped fuel system. A low-pressure pumped fuel system could incorporate various design refinements including a simpler and lighter-weight pump, which would decrease costs somewhat relative to a high-pressure system.

Greg Harper; Charles Powars

2003-10-31T23:59:59.000Z