Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Environment/Health/Safety/Security (EHSS): Construction Safety Assurance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EH&S EH&S Construction Safety Assurance For Sub-Contractors Home EHS0470-GERT OSHA and Federal Postings JHA Templates Tool Box Safety Topics Pub-3000 Ch. 10 - Construction Safety Manual Administrative Policies Pub-3000 Ch. 10 Appx. A Pub-3000 Ch. 10 Appx. B Construction Safety Startup Kit 2013 All Contractor's & their employees entering LBNL property to do any type of work are required to take the LBNL "General Employee Radiation Training" (this can be done online) & "Construction Subcontractor Safety Orientation" (onsite) courses. These courses must be completed prior to the start of any work. Construction Safety Orientation-GERT Training INSTRUCTIONS FOR TAKING GERT: To prepare for taking the online training course, click on the link

2

Environment, Safety, and Health Assurance Program Standard: analysis in the context of Department of Energy environment, safety, and health requirements  

SciTech Connect

An Environment, Safety and Health (ES and H) Assurance Program Standard is presented. The Standard was published for comments in a previous document, and has been revised as a result of those comments. The benefits of using the Standard are described and, through the use of comparisons, it is demonstrated that the requirements of the applicable Department of Energy (DOE) Orders are satisfied by a program designed in accordance with the Standard.

Ellingson, A.C.; Trauth, C.A. Jr.

1979-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

3

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1988 to the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health: Part 5, Environment, safety, health, and quality assurance  

SciTech Connect

This document summarizes the research programs now underway at Battelle's Pacific Northwest Laboratory in the areas of environmental safety, health, and quality assurance. Topics include internal irradiation, emergency plans, dose equivalents, risk assessment, dose equivalents, surveys, neutron dosimetry, and radiation accidents. (TEM)

Faust, L.G.; Pennell, W.T.; Selby, J.M.

1989-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

4

Nuclear Safety: Software Quality Assurance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nuclear Safety: Software Quality Assurance Nuclear Safety: Software Quality Assurance cd Welcome to the Department of Energy's Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Software Quality Assurance (SQA) homepage. The purpose of this Web site is to promote continuous improvement and the sharing of knowledge of safety software quality assurance among interested parties across the DOE complex. It consolidates information and contains links to subject matter experts, procedures, training material, program descriptions, good practices, lessons learned and the Central Registry Toolbox Codes. The Portal also provides capabilities for member collaboration in product development and threaded discussions. Central Registry: The Central Registry provides a library of DOE "Toolbox" Codes covering site boundary accident dose consequences, fire accident source terms, leakpath factors, chemical release/dispersion and consequence, and radiological dispersion and consequence.

5

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1987 to the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health: Part 5: Environment, safety, health, and quality assurance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Part 5 of the 1987 Annual Report to the US Department of Energy's Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health presents Pacific Northwest Laboratory's progress on work performed for the Office of Nuclear Safety, the Office of Environmental Guidance and Compliance, the Office of Environmental Audit, and the Office of National Environmental Policy Act Project Assistance. For each project, as identified by the Field Work Proposal, articles describe progress made during fiscal year 1987. Authors of these articles represent a broad spectrum of capabilities derived from five of the seven technical centers of the Laboratory, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the work.

Faust, L.G.; Steelman, B.L.; Selby, J.M.

1988-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

6

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1989 to the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health - Part 5: Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality Assurance  

SciTech Connect

Part 5 of the 1989 Annual Report to the US Department of Energy's Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health presents Pacific Northwest Laboratory's progress on work performed for the Office of Environmental Guidance and Compliance, the Office of Environmental Audit, the Office of National Environmental Policy Act Project Assistance, the Office of Nuclear Safety, the Office of Safety Compliance, and the Office of Policy and Standards. For each project, as identified by the Field Work Proposal, there is an article describing progress made during fiscal year 1989. Authors of these articles represent a broad spectrum of capabilities derived from five of the seven technical centers of the Laboratory, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the work. 35 refs., 1 fig.

Faust, L.G.; Doctor, P.G.; Selby, J.M.

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

7

DNFSB 2002-1 Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan Commitment 4.2.1.2: Safety Quality Assurance Plan and Criteria for the Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-Criteria 2-Criteria Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2002-1 Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan Commitment 4.2.1.2: Software Quality Assurance Plan and Criteria for the Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and Health 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20585-2040 November 2003 Software Quality Assurance Criteria for Safety Analysis Codes November 2003 INTENTIONALLY BLANK ii Software Quality Assurance Criteria for Safety Analysis Codes November 2003 FOREWORD This document discusses the Software Quality Assurance plan, and criteria and implementation procedures to be used to evaluate designated, safety-related computer software for the

8

Safety Software Quality Assurance: Training  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Training Training classroom DOE is committed to provide qualified staff to assist, guide, direct, oversee and evaluate its safety software. The Department's Safety Software Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard (FAQS) establishes common functional area competency requirements for its personnel. Additionally, specific Office/Facility-Specific Qualification Standard supplements the technical FAQS and establishes unique operational competency requirements. DOE O 426.1, Federal Technical Capability defines the requirements and responsibilities for developing a technically competent workforce to accomplish DOE missions in a safe and efficient manner through the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). This accomplished through the Technical Qualification Program (TQP) which applies to DOE technical employess whose duties and responsibilities require them to provide assistance, guidance, direction, or oversight that could affect the safe operation of a defense nuclear facility, including evaluation of contractor activities at those facilities. The TQP, along with the supporting technical Functional Area Qualification Standards, complements the personnel processes that support DOE's drive for technical excellence. Detailed operating requirements for the TQP and Functional Area Qualification Standards are described in DOE M 426.1-1.

9

Quality assurance and testing for safety systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper we identify special quality assurance and test requirements of software for safety systems and show that even the best currently available practices meet these requirements only at very high cost and by application of empirical ...

Herbert Hecht; Myron Hecht

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

FAQS Qualification Card - Safety Software Quality Assurance | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Software Quality Assurance Safety Software Quality Assurance FAQS Qualification Card - Safety Software Quality Assurance A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-SafetySoftwareQualityAssurance.docx Description Safety Software Quality Assurance Qualification Card More Documents & Publications

11

Safety Assurance for Irradiating Experiments in the Advanced Test Reactor  

SciTech Connect

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), located at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), was specifically designed to provide a high neutron flux test environment for conducting a variety of experiments. This paper addresses the safety assurance process for two general types of experiments conducted in the ATR facility and how the safety analyses for experiments are related to the ATR safety basis. One type of experiment is more routine and generally represents greater risks; therefore, this type of experiment is addressed in more detail in the ATR safety basis. This allows the individual safety analysis for this type of experiment to be more standardized. The second type of experiment is defined in more general terms in the ATR safety basis and is permitted under more general controls. Therefore, the individual safety analysis for the second type of experiment tends to be more unique and is tailored to each experiment.

T. A. Tomberlin; S. B. Grover

2004-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

12

Safety Software Quality Assurance - Central Registry | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Software Quality Assurance - Central Registry Safety Software Quality Assurance - Central Registry Safety Software Quality Assurance - Central Registry A significant improvement in the quality assurance of safety software used at the Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities was achieved with the establishment of a list of "toolbox" codes that are compliant with the DOE Safety Software Quality Assurance (SSQA) requirements of DOE O 414.1D, Quality Assurance, and its safety software guidance, DOE G 414.1-4. The toolbox codes are used by DOE contractors to perform calculations and to develop data used to establish the safety basis for DOE facilities and their operation, and to support the variety of safety analyses and safety evaluations developed for these facilities. The following list of toolbox

13

Focused Review of Environment, Safety and Health and Emergency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environment, Safety and Health and Emergency Management at the Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance ISM Summary Report OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0...

14

SAFETY SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Software Safety Software Quality Assurance Qualification Standard Reference Guide MARCH 2011 This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iii PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... 1

15

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Safety and Health Standards Set for LBNL Environment, Safety and Health Standards Set for LBNL Due to a recent Contract 31 action, the Necessary and Sufficient process...

16

Mission Assurance Challenges within the Military Environment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Virtually all modern organizations have embedded information and communication technologies into their core processes as a means to increase operational efficiency, improve decision quality, and reduce operational costs. However, this dependence can ... Keywords: Cyber Mission Assurance, Embedded Information and Communication Technologies, Mission Assurance, Mission-to-Cyber Relationships, Risk Management

Scott Musman, Michael R. Grimaila

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

Nanotech/Environment, Health & Safety Portal  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Home > Nanotech/Environment, Health & Safety Portal. Nanotech/Environment, Health & Safety Portal. Programs and ...

2013-05-16T23:59:59.000Z

18

ORISE: Contact Environment, Safety & Health  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety Integrated Safety Management Voluntary Protection Program VPP Star Status Environment Work Smart Standards Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education Contact Us Use the form...

19

Environment, Safety & Health  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Links Links ESSH Policy Site Environmental Reports Environmental Regulators Upton Ecological and Research Reserve Pollution Prevention Organizations ES&H Directorate Environmental Protection Division Environmental Restoration Division Safety & Health Services Other BNL Site Index Can't View PDFs? Environment, Safety & Health Brookhaven National Lab is committed to continual improvement in environmental, safety, security, and health (ESSH) performance. Full policy description. Restoration Projects Brookhaven Graphite Research Reactor decommissioning, High Flux Beam Reactor decommissioning Groundwater Projects Peconic River Cleanup Peconic River Working Group Environmental Restoration Projects green tech ISB-inspired Greening Strategies for Your Home or Office Being green isn't rocket science. Several strategies that earned the ISB its LEED Gold certification can help reduce energy usage and make any building more environmentally friendly.

20

Environment, Safety and Health Thesaurus/Dictionary  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Environment, Safety and Health Thesaurus/Dictionary, was developed for the Office of Safety and Quality Assurance (EH-30) by the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI). This thesaurus/dictionary is to provide a single departmental reference for: (1) definitions or semantic structure of environment, safety, and health terms that will help assure consistent DOE-wide understanding of these terms, and (2) synonyms and related terms that will improve the logic of a user's analytical strategy for word searches in computerized environment, safety, and health information systems. In addition to special data fields found within the individual word blocks, the most noteworthy features of the document are the three appendices following the main body of the thesaurus. These appendices include: (1) a listing of all thesaurus acronyms and their reciprocal phrases; (2) a listing of all thesaurus terms under broader subject categories; and (3) a separate mini-thesaurus for the DOE FRASE (Factor Relationship and Sequence of Events) vocabulary used on the Safety Performance Measurement System (SPMS). Eventually, an electronic version of the thesaurus/dictionary will be available on the Safety Performance Measurement System (SPMS) to improve users' search and analytical capabilities.

Clayton, D.C. (ed.)

1991-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Pantex Plant, Technical Appendices, Volume II, February 2005 Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Pantex Plant, Technical Appendices, Volume II, February 2005 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at the DOE Pantex Plant during January and February 2005. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. OA reports to the Director of the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance, who reports directly to the Secretary of Energy. This volume of the report provides four technical appendices (C through F)

22

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Technical Appendices, Volume II, December 2004 Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Technical Appendices, Volume II, December 2004 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), within the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance (SSA), conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) during October and November 2004. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. Volume II of this report provides four technical appendices (C through F)

23

Safety assured financial evaluation of maintenance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Management decisions in complex industrial facilities usually consider both the economic and environmental aspects of the plant's performance. For nuclear power plants (NPPs), safety is also a very substantial issue. The objectives of this dissertation are to develop and demonstrate a novel useful conceptual model that could be used to allocate maintenance funds for a nuclear power plant in such a way as to meet all specified safety requirements and objectives, while achieving a high degree of economic performance. The model is based on the general theory that the reliability of a plant at any time is a function of its initial reliability and the maintenance history of the individual plant components (Smith, 1997). Such a model can assist in evaluating strategic management decisions regarding allocation of funds for nuclear power plant maintenance. It could be used as a simulation tool; various scenarios could be studied to answer "what if" questions. Simulations of this type will allow a better understanding of the relationship between maintenance, economic performance, and safety, and consequently will lead to better decision making. The novelty of this model is tied to the intimate relationship that it develops between maintenance activities at a nuclear plant, and their relationship to prescribed safety requirements and to the economic performance of that plant.

Erguina, Vera

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

24

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to assist Berkeley Lab supervisors and managers in conducting discussions on environment, safety and health topics with their staff. Each slide delivers focused talking...

25

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

recommendations to the Laboratory Director on the development and implementation of Environment, Safety & Health (ES&H) policy, guidelines, codes and regulatory interpretation. It...

26

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Concerns Training SubcontractorsVendors (SJHA) Waste Management What We Do The EnvironmentHealthSafety division helps Berkeley Lab staff perform their work safely and in an...

27

Safety Software Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-2011 2-2011 March 2011 DOE STANDARD SAFETY SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1172-2011 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1172-2011 INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1172-2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPROVAL ............................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................................ i

28

The Environment, Health and Safety  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Health and Safety Program at the MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Catherine Fiore PSFC Office of ES&H May 14, 2003 C Mod Alcator Design of the EHS system for...

29

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Argonne National Laboratory, Technical Appendices, Volume II, May 2005 Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Argonne National Laboratory, Technical Appendices, Volume II, May 2005 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) inspected environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at the DOE Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) during April and May 2005. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. This volume of the report provides four technical appendices (C through F) containing detailed results of the OA review. Appendix C provides the results of the review of the application of the core functions of ISM for

30

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health and Emergency Management at  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health and Emergency Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health and Emergency Management at the Nevada Test Site - Summary Report, October 2002 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health and Emergency Management at the Nevada Test Site - Summary Report, October 2002 The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) and emergency management programs at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Nevada Test Site (NTS) in September and October 2002. The inspection was performed as a joint effort by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations and the Office of Emergency Management Oversight. As discussed throughout this report, the emergency management program at

31

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Appendices, Volume II, May 2005 Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Appendices, Volume II, May 2005 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) inspected environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at DOE Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) during March and April 2005. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. This volume of the report provides four technical appendices (C through F) containing detailed results of the OA review. Appendix C provides the results of the review of the application of the core functions of ISM for

32

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Waste  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - Volume I, August 2002 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - Volume I, August 2002 The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) and emergency management programs at the Department of Energy (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in July and August 2002. The inspection was performed as a joint effort by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations and the Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This volume discusses the results of the review of the WIPP ES&H programs. The results of the review of the WIPP emergency management program are

33

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Appendices, Volume II, May 2005 Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Appendices, Volume II, May 2005 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) inspected environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at DOE Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) during March and April 2005. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. This volume of the report provides four technical appendices (C through F) containing detailed results of the OA review. Appendix C provides the

34

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Argonne  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Argonne National Laboratory - East, Volume I, May 2002 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Argonne National Laboratory - East, Volume I, May 2002 The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs and emergency management programs at the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) in April and May 2002. The inspection was performed as a joint effort by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations and the Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This volume discusses the results of the review of ANL ES&H programs. The results of the review of the ANL emergency

35

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Engineering  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety Engineering Safety Engineering provides occupational safety services to support the Lab's mission. This includes injury and illness prevention and loss control systems for...

36

AN L-88-12 Environment. Safety and Health Department  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8-12 Environment. Safety and Health Department Environment. Safety and Health Department Environment. Safety and Hearth Department 4rivironment Safety and ni.r.prfrwTanf...

37

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Hanford  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Hanford Site, March 2002 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Hanford Site, March 2002 The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) management at the Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site in January-February 2002. Overall, RL and FHI have made significant improvements and established the framework for an effective ISM program. RL and FHI have provided leadership and devoted resources to ES&H programs and ISM, including innovative tools and aggressive efforts to address worker concerns. Section 2 provides an overall discussion of the results of the review of

38

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Minute  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(PDF, PPT) Badge Return (LBNL) (PDF, PPT) Battery Management (PDF, PPT) Bicycle Safety (PDF, PPT) Construction-Related Mercury Spills (PDF, PPT) Construction Vehicle Safety...

39

Independent Oversight Lessons Learned Report - Environment, Safety, and Health Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environment, Safety, and Health Evaluations Independent Oversight Lessons Learned Report Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance U. S. Department of Energy OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................1 2.0 RESULTS .................................................................................3 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE INSPECTION AREAS OF EMPHASIS...........................................................7 APPENDIX A - FOCUS AREA RESULTS ....................................8 APPENDIX B - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ................25 Abbreviations Used in This Report AAAHC Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable CAIRS Computerized Accident and Injury Reporting System

40

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Laser Safety  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Laser Safety Home Whom to Call Analysis of Laser Safety Occurrences: 2005-2011 Laser Bio-effects Laser Classification Laser Disposal Guide Laser Forms Laser Newsletter Laser Lab...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

LM Environment, Safety, and Health Policy | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environment, Safety, and Health Policy LM Environment, Safety, and Health Policy LM Policy 450.9 - Environment, Safety, and Health Policy (Last ReviewUpdate 11292011 ) LM...

42

DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Guide provides acceptable methods for implementing the safety software quality assurance requirements of draft DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance. Certified ...

2005-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

43

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Minute  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Numbers & Contacts (PDF, PPT) Emergency Response Guide (PDF, PPT) Occurence Reporting (ORPS) (PDF, PPT) Reporting Hazardous Conditions (PDF, PPT) Reporting Safety Concerns (PDF,...

44

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Minute  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

at Home (PDF, PPT) Emergency Response - Tips for Home (PDF, PPT) Household Hazardous Waste (PDF, PPT) Preventing Fires at Home (PDF, PPT) Tire Safety (PDF, PPT) Vehicle Inspections...

45

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Minute  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Shop Area (PDF, PPT) Chemical Inventory (PDF, PPT) Chemical Management System - Consumer Products (PDF, PPT) Earthquake Restraints (PDF, PPT) Equipment Use (PDF, PPT) Ladder Safety...

46

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Minute  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mistakes in Managing (PDF, PPT) Biohazardous Waste, Managing (PDF, PPT) Chemical Inventory (PDF, PPT) Chemical Management System - Consumer Products (PDF, PPT) Chemical Safety...

47

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LBNL/PUB-3092 LBNL/PUB-3092 Guidelines for Generators to Meet HWHF Acceptance Requirements for Hazardous, Radioactive, and Mixed Wastes at Berkeley Lab Waste Management Group Environment, Health, and Safety Division Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of California Berkeley, California 94720 Revision 7.1 October 2011 1. Hazardous Wastes. 1- 1 Summary of Hazardous Waste Requirements. 1- 2 1.1 How Do I Know If My Waste Is Hazardous?. 1- 3 1.1.1 Characteristic Waste. 1- 4 1.1.1.1 Ignitability. 1- 4 1.1.1.2 Corrosivity. 1- 4 1.1.1.3 Reactivity. 1- 5 1.1.1.4 Toxicity. 1- 5 1.1.2 Listed Waste. 1- 6 1.1.3 Chemical Compatibility. 1- 7 1.1.4 Excess Laboratory Chemicals and Laboratory Cleanouts. 1- 10 1.1.5 Unknowns. 1- 10

48

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Savannah River Operations Office and Savannah River Site, January 2010 Independent Oversight...

49

PNNL: Procurement: Contractor Environment, Safety & Health: Manuals  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search PNNL Home About Research Publications Jobs News Contacts Business Contractor Environment, Safety & Health PNNL Visitor Orientation PNNL Visitors Guide Manuals PNNL...

50

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

S S A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z SAAR - Supervisor's Accident Analysis Report SAAR for Division Safety Coordinators Safety Concerns/Comments Safety Engineering (Division) Safety Committee Safety Advisory Committee (LBNL) Safety Coordinator and Liaison Resources Safety Flicks Safety Shoes Safety Walk Around Check List Safety Walk Around Check List for Managers Satellite Accumulation Areas Security call x5472 Security and Emergency Operations Shipping & Transporting Hazardous Materials Shoemobile (schedule) (form) Site Access (parking permits, gate passes, buses) Site Environmental Report Site Map SJHA Spot Award Program Stop Work Policy Stretch Break Software-RSIGuard Subcontractor Job Hazard Analysis

51

Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH EVALUATIONS APPRAISAL PROCESS GUIDE July 2009 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and...

52

Management of National Nuclear Power Programs for assured safety  

SciTech Connect

Topics discussed in this report include: nuclear utility organization; before the Florida Public Service Commission in re: St. Lucie Unit No. 2 cost recovery; nuclear reliability improvement and safety operations; nuclear utility management; training of nuclear facility personnel; US experience in key areas of nuclear safety; the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission - function and process; regulatory considerations of the risk of nuclear power plants; overview of the processes of reliability and risk management; management significance of risk analysis; international and domestic institutional issues for peaceful nuclear uses; the role of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO); and nuclear safety activities of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Connolly, T.J. (ed.)

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

Focused Review of Environment, Safety and Health and Emergency Management at the Kansas City Plant - Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environment, Safety and Health Environment, Safety and Health and Emergency Management at the Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance ISM Summary Report OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ..............................................................................1 2.0 Status and Results ....................................................................3 3.0 Conclusions ..............................................................................8 4.0 Ratings .................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION .................13 APPENDIX B - SITE-SPECIFIC FINDINGS .............................15 Abbreviations Used in This Report AL Albuquerque Operations Office DOE U.S. Department of Energy

54

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health at the Los Alamos National Laboratory - Volume I  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Alamos Los Alamos National Laboratory Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy April 2002 ISM Volume I INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT AT THE LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY Volume I April 2002 i INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT AT THE LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY Volume I TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Status and Results .......................................................................................................................3

55

The Development of Quality Assurance and Visualization for Safety Assessment System  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Site Information and Total Environmental data management System (SITES) is an integrated program for overall data acquisition, environmental monitoring, and safety analysis. SITES is composed of three main modules such as site database system, safety assessment system and environmental monitoring system named SECURE, SAINT and SUDAL, respectively. SAINT abbreviated for Safety Assessment Integration system is the integrated interface for the radioactive waste safety assessment codes in the SITES. SAINT is developed for the application and analysis of data from SECURE and for the systematic management of the resulted data from the safety assessment. The Quality Assurance module in SAINT is implemented to enhance the reliability of safety assessment results. The visualization in SAINT is purposed of reliability, comprehension of safety assessment results and user's convenience which can easily recognize the assessment results using the geographic information. (authors)

Lak Kim, C.; Yo Yun, B.; Lee, K.J.; Moon Park, S.; Wan Park, J.; Ho Choi, S. [Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co. LTD. (KHNP) (Korea, Republic of)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

56

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

R A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Radiation Protection Radiation Safety Radiation Safety Committee REMS - Radiation Exposure Monitoring System Report Accident...

57

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

I A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Plan Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Plan Archives Industrial Hygiene Injury and Illness...

58

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

D A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Databases - EHS Disability Management Division ISM Division Safety Committee Division Safety Coordinators Dosimetry Downloads...

59

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

L A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Laser Management System Laser Safety LBNL Safety Advisory Committee LCATS - LBNL Corrective Action Tracking System Lessons...

60

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

P A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z PUB-3000 - Health & Safety Manual PUB-3092 - Waste Generator Guidelines PUB-3140 - Integrated Safety Management Plan (ISM)...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Environment and safety research status report: 1993  

SciTech Connect

The 1993 status report discusses ongoing and planned research activities in the GRI Environment and Safety Program. The objectives and goals, accomplishments, and strategy along with the basis for each project area are presented for the supply, end use, and gas operations subprograms. Within the context of these subprograms, contract status summaries under their conceptual titles are given for the following project areas: Gas Supply Environmental and Safety Research, Air Quality Research, End Use Equipment Safety Research, Gas Operations Safety Research, Liquefied Natural Gas, Safety Research, and Gas Operations Environmental Research.

Not Available

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

62

Environment/Health/Safety Division: News  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

How EHS Helped Build A First-Of-Its-Kind Accelerator A two-part series follows the EnvironmentHealthSafety (EHS) Division as a partner on the BELLA project from before its...

63

Environment/Health/Safety/Security Concerns  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

hardhat EnvironmentHealthSafetySecurity Concerns construction workers If you have a life-threatening emergency, please dial 7-911 or 911 from Lab phones and 911 from a cell...

64

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Oak Ridge  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Oak Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Oak Ridge Operations Office and East Tennessee Technology Park - Volume I, May 2003 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Oak Ridge Operations Office and East Tennessee Technology Park - Volume I, May 2003 The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) and emergency management programs at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) site in April-May 2003. The inspection was performed as a joint effort by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations and the Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This volume discusses the results of the review of the ETTP ES&H

65

DOE Standard Integration Of Environment,Safety, and Health Into...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standard Integration Of Environment,Safety, and Health Into Facility Disposition Activities DOE Standard Integration Of Environment,Safety, and Health Into Facility Disposition...

66

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

F A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Facility Safety Plan Feedback Fire Department 510-486-6015 Fire DepartmentProtection First Aid...

67

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

C A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z CATS (Corrective Action Tracking System) Chair Massage Program Checklist - Safety Walk Around Check List for Managers Chemical...

68

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

O A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z One Minute 4 Safety Org Chart (EH&S Division) Org Chart (OCFOASD - EH&S) ORPS - Occurrence Reporting OSHA's Form 300A: Annual...

69

Environment, Safety and Health | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

About Environment, Safety and ... Environment, Safety and Health In performing Y-12's mission and in modernizing the Y-12 Complex, we are fully committed to ensuring the safety...

70

Environment, safety, and health considerations for a new accelerator facility  

SciTech Connect

A study of siting considerations for possible future accelerators at Fermilab is underway. Each candidate presents important challenges in environment, safety, and health (ES&H) that are reviewed generically in this paper. Some of these considerations are similar to those that have been encountered and solved during the construction and operation of other accelerator facilities. Others have not been encountered previously on the same scale. The novel issues will require particular attention coincident with project design efforts to assure their timely cost-effective resolution. It is concluded that with adequate planning, the issues can be addressed in a manner that merits the support of the Laboratory, the US Department of Energy (DOE), and the public.

J. Donald Cossairt [and others

2001-04-23T23:59:59.000Z

71

Environment, Safety and Health Bulletin 2005-12: Working Safely...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to events whose subject matter represents significant Departmental safety concerns. Environment, Safety and Health Alerts are issued to initiate immediate action on potentially...

72

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Response Organization ES&H Environment, Safety, and Health ISM Integrated Safety Management NNSA National Nuclear Security Administration OA Office of Independent Oversight and...

73

Brookhaven National Laboratory Industrial Hygiene Group Environment, Safety, Health Directorate  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Safety & Health Services Division Industrial Hygiene Laboratory R. Wilson (0.8) __________________ 06Brookhaven National Laboratory Industrial Hygiene Group Environment, Safety, Health Directorate

Homes, Christopher C.

74

Brookhaven National Laboratory Industrial Hygiene Group Environment, Safety, Health Directorate  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Safety & Health Services Division Industrial Hygiene Laboratory/ HEPA Filter Surveillance TestingBrookhaven National Laboratory Industrial Hygiene Group Environment, Safety, Health Directorate

Homes, Christopher C.

75

Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations - Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Reports Review Reports 2010 Review of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project, October 2010 Site Visit Report - Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility, June 2010 Independent Oversight Inspection of the Hanford Site Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program, June 2010 Site Visit Report - Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Fire Protection Design Review Process, May 2010 Independent Oversight Assessment of Environmental Monitoring at the Idaho National Laboratory Site, May 2010 Independent Oversight Focus Area Review of Specific Administrative Controls at DOE Nuclear Facilities, April 2010

76

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety and Health Management at the Sandia National Laboratories - New Mexico - Volume I  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sandia National Sandia National Laboratories - New Mexico Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy February 2003 ISM Volume I INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT AT THE SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES - NEW MEXICO Volume I February 2003 i INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT AT THE SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES/NEW MEXICO Volume I Table of Contents Acronyms .........................................................................................................................................iii 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................1

77

Environment, Safety & Health Directorate Assistant Laboratory Director (ALD)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Environment, Safety & Health Directorate Assistant Laboratory Director (ALD) Environmental Division (4) Matrixed from Safety & Health Services Division (5) Matrixed from Procurement & Property Procurement Support (5) D&D Manager Work Control Manager Safety & Health Manager (4) Facility Configuration

Homes, Christopher C.

78

Environment, Safety, Health, & Security | Princeton Plasma Physics Lab  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sustainable PPPL Joint Working Group for Fusion Safety Procurement Division Technology Transfer Furth Plasma Physics Library Contact Us Lab Leadership Directory Careers/ Human Resources Environment, Safety & Health Sustainable PPPL Joint Working Group for Fusion Safety Procurement Division Technology Transfer Furth Plasma Physics Library Environment, Safety, Health, & Security About PPPL ESH&S The Environment, Safety, Health, & Security Department provides safety oversight and assistance for the wide variety of plasma and fusion research projects undertaken at the Laboratory as well as stewardship for the environment and our property and assets. The department is comprised of four divisions: Environmental Services, Safety, Health Physics, and Site

79

Nuclear Power - Operation, Safety and Environment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Today's nuclear reactors are safe and highly efficient energy systems that offer electricity and a multitude of co-generation energy products ranging from potable water to heat for industrial applications. At the same time, catastrophic earthquake and tsunami events in Japan resulted in the nuclear accident that forced us to rethink our approach to nuclear safety, design requirements and facilitated growing interests in advanced nuclear energy systems, next generation nuclear reactors, which are inherently capable to withstand natural disasters and avoid catastrophic consequences without any environmental impact. This book is one in a series of books on nuclear power published by InTech. Under the single-volume cover, we put together such topics as operation, safety, environment and radiation effects. The book is not offering a comprehensive coverage of the material in each area. Instead, selected themes are highlighted by authors of individual chapters representing contemporary interests worldwide. With all diversity of topics in 16 chapters, the integrated system analysis approach of nuclear power operation, safety and environment is the common thread. The goal of the book is to bring nuclear power to our readers as one of the promising energy sources that has a unique potential to meet energy demands with minimized environmental impact, near-zero carbon footprint, and competitive economics via robust potential applications. The book targets everyone as its potential readership groups - students, researchers and practitioners - who are interested to learn about nuclear power.

Tsvetkov, Pavel

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

80

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Division Liaisons  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Division Liaisons EHSS Division Liaisons are responsible for putting you in touch with the right person and for assuring that your EHSS problems are addressed promptly. Please also...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

NREL: Environment, Safety, Health and Quality - Quality  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

expertise, and supporting infrastructure required to deliver quality research, products, services, and work processes by implementing our Quality Assurance Program. Using this...

82

Glossary of Environment, Safety and Health Terms  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-HDBK-1188-2006 DOE-HDBK-1188-2006 January 2006 DOE HANDBOOK GLOSSARY OF ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH TERMS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SDMP Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-1188-2006 2 Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE-HDBK-1188-2006 3 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................................4 1.1 Purpose.............................................................................................................................................................................4

83

Fuzzy-algebra uncertainty analysis for abnormal-environment safety assessment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Many safety (risk) analyses depend on uncertain inputs and on mathematical models chosen from various alternatives, but give fixed results (implying no uncertainty). Conventional uncertainty analyses help, but are also based on assumptions and models, the accuracy of which may be difficult to assure. Some of the models and assumptions that on cursory examination seem reasonable can be misleading. As a result, quantitative assessments, even those accompanied by uncertainty measures, can give unwarranted impressions of accuracy. Since analysis results can be a major contributor to a safety-measure decision process, risk management depends on relating uncertainty to only the information available. The uncertainties due to abnormal environments are even more challenging than those in normal-environment safety assessments, and therefore require an even more cautious approach. A fuzzy algebra analysis is proposed in this report that has the potential to appropriately reflect the information available and portray uncertainties well, especially for abnormal environments.

Cooper, J.A.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

DOE-STD-1172-2003; Safety Software Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

72-2003 72-2003 December 2003 DOE STANDARD SAFETY SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1172-2003 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1172-2003

85

Quality Assurance Exchange, September 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 7 I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : Focus on Quality Assurance 1 Use of QA Consensus Standards 1 What is the Analytical Services Program? 3 SQA Work Activity #6: Safety Software Design & Implementation 4 HSS QA Activity Corner 6 Upcoming Meetings & Conferences 7 Just for Fun 8 Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E E X C H A N G E HSS FOCUS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE health, as well as the environment, de- crease and productivity increases with the appropriate rigor of quality assurance. The corporate responsibility for ensuring implementation of these five principles rests within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). HS-20, the Office of Nuclear Safety and Environment, inter- prets QA requirements and develops pol- icy; HS-30, the Office of Corporate Safety

86

Comprehensive environment, health, and safety program report, FY 1978  

SciTech Connect

A description is given of the environment, health, and safety research, development, and demonstration activities carried out and in progress. Discussion is presented under the following section headings: a comprehensive environment, health, and safety program: concept and implementation approach; the DOE Office of Environment - program and selected activities; environmental, health, and safety activities of other DOE offices; and, environmental, health, and safety activities of other federal agencies; titles of the four appendixes are: definition of research categories; summary of energy-related environment, health, and safety concerns; environment, health, and safety laws and regulations governing activities of the Department of Energy; and environmental, health, and safety activities of federal agencies participating in the Federal Inventory. (JGB)

1979-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

Environment/Health/Safety Division: News  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8.2.2013 8.2.2013 Bringing One-of-A-Kind Laser Accelerator Online A two-part series follows the Environment/Health/Safety (EHS) Division as a partner on the BELLA project from before its green light in 2009, to a record of one petawatt of peak power, to final approval in early 2013. MEDIA Laser bay image of workers testing equipment photo of laser equipment inoperation It isn't often when a review team makes its way up the hill to inspect and give its blessing on a new accelerator. The last time was in 1993 when the Advanced Light Source started hurtling electrons at just under the speed of light. An accelerator readiness review team - comprised of experts from Berkeley Lab, SLAC, and Argonne - made the trek to Building 71 last December to put their stamp of approval on the Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator (BELLA).

88

Gas Research Institute environment and safety research program. Status report  

SciTech Connect

The 1992 status report describes ongoing planned activities in the Environment and Safety Research Program. The objectives and goals, accomplishments, and strategies are discussed for the supply, end use, and gas operations subprograms. Contract status summaries are presented for the following project areas: Gas Supply Environmental and Safety Research, Air Quality Research, Combustion Systems Emissions Control, End Use Equipment Safety Research, Gas Operations Safety Research, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Safety Research, Gas Operations Environmental Research, and End Use Bioengineering.

Not Available

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

89

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Personal Protective Equipment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

However, PPE is not a substitute for appropriate engineering controls. The Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S) Division advises on the protective equipment required for...

90

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS):SAC: DSC: Membership  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sciences Vivi Fissekidou 5610 Engineering Weyland Wong Marshall Granados 6045 7915 EnvironmentHealthSafetySecurity Patrick Thorson Mike Ruggieri 5852 5440 Environmental Energy...

91

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy DPOC Divisional Point of Contact EM DOE Headquarters Office of Environmental Management EMS Environmental Management System ES&H Environment, Safety, and Health FADB Field...

92

Environment, Health, & Safety Training Program EOC-011 An Introduction...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8.5.11 Environment, Health, & Safety Training Program EOC-011 An Introduction to the National Response Framework (FEMA ICS-800.b) COURSE SYLLABUS Subject Category: Emergency...

93

Letter Report, Environment, Safety & Health Issues at the Ashtabula...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Letter Report, Environment, Safety & Health Issues at the Ashtabula Environmental Management Project,...

94

Environment, Health, & Safety Training Program EHS-156 Building...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Health, & Safety Training Program EHS-156 Building Managers Orientation COURSE SYLLABUS Subject Category: Building Managers Schedule: As requested Course Length: 2.0...

95

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Savannah River Operations Office and Savannah River Site, January 2010 Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Savannah River Operations Office and Savannah River Site, January 2010 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), inspected environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at the DOE Savannah River Site (SRS) during August and September 2009. The inspection was performed by the Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations to support site management in the execution of the SRS mission. This 2009 Independent Oversight inspection was conducted during a period in

96

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Savannah  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Savannah River Site, February 2006 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Savannah River Site, February 2006 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight (Independent Oversight) conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at the DOE Savannah River Site (SRS) during January and February 2006. The inspection was performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. Most aspects of EM/SR, NNSA/SRSO, and WSRC ISM systems are conceptually sound, and many aspects are effectively implemented. For the most part, WSRC managers and workers were well qualified and demonstrated their understanding of and commitment to safety. WSRC has devoted significant

97

Environment, Safety and Health Self-Assessment Report Fiscal Year 2010  

SciTech Connect

The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Self-Assessment Program was established to ensure that Integrated Safety Management (ISM) is implemented institutionally and by all divisions. The ES&H Self-Assessment Program, managed by the Office of Contractor Assurance (OCA), provides for an internal evaluation of all ES&H programs and systems at LBNL. The primary objective of the program is to ensure that work is conducted safely and with minimal negative impact to workers, the public, and the environment. Self-assessment follows the five core functions and guiding principles of ISM. Self-assessment is the mechanism used to promote the continuous improvement of the Laboratory's ES&H programs. The process is described in the Environment, Safety, and Health Assurance Plan (PUB-5344) and is composed of three types of self-assessments: Division ES&H Self-Assessment, ES&H Technical Assurance Program Assessment, and Division ES&H Peer Review. The Division ES&H Self-Assessment Manual (PUB-3105) provides the framework by which divisions conduct formal ES&H self-assessments to systematically identify program deficiencies. Issue-specific assessments are designed and implemented by the divisions and focus on areas of interest to division management. They may be conducted by teams and involve advance planning to ensure that appropriate resources are available. The ES&H Technical Assurance Program Manual (PUB-913E) provides the framework for systematic reviews of ES&H programs and processes. The ES&H Technical Assurance Program Assessment is designed to evaluate whether ES&H programs and processes are compliant with guiding regulations, are effective, and are properly implemented by LBNL divisions. The Division ES&H Peer Review Manual provides the framework by which division ISM systems are evaluated and improved. Peer Reviews are conducted by teams under the direction of senior division management and focus on higher-level management issues. Peer Review teams are selected on the basis of members knowledge and experience in the issues of interest to the division director. LBNL periodically requests in-depth independent assessments of selected ES&H programs. Such assessments augment LBNL's established assessment processes and provide an objective view of ES&H program effectiveness. Institutional Findings, Observations, and Noteworthy Practices identified during independent assessments are specifically intended to help LBNL identify opportunities for program improvement. This report includes the results of the Division ES&H Self-Assessment, ES&H Technical Assurance Program Assessment, and Division ES&H Peer Review, respectively.

Robinson, Scott

2011-03-23T23:59:59.000Z

98

Probability of loss of assured safety in systems with multiple time-dependent failure modes.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Weak link (WL)/strong link (SL) systems are important parts of the overall operational design of high-consequence systems. In such designs, the SL system is very robust and is intended to permit operation of the entire system under, and only under, intended conditions. In contrast, the WL system is intended to fail in a predictable and irreversible manner under accident conditions and render the entire system inoperable before an accidental operation of the SL system. The likelihood that the WL system will fail to deactivate the entire system before the SL system fails (i.e., degrades into a configuration that could allow an accidental operation of the entire system) is referred to as probability of loss of assured safety (PLOAS). Representations for PLOAS for situations in which both link physical properties and link failure properties are time-dependent are derived and numerically evaluated for a variety of WL/SL configurations, including PLOAS defined by (i) failure of all SLs before failure of any WL, (ii) failure of any SL before failure of any WL, (iii) failure of all SLs before failure of all WLs, and (iv) failure of any SL before failure of all WLs. The effects of aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty in the definition and numerical evaluation of PLOAS are considered.

Helton, Jon Craig; Pilch, Martin M.; Sallaberry, Cedric M.

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

PNNL: About PNNL: Environment, Health, Safety & Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Health, Safety and Security Environment, Health, Safety and Security The success of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is, in part, dependent upon operational excellence. At PNNL, "operational excellence" means harnessing the energy and passion of every staff member to accomplish our mission: delivering outstanding research results in science and technology while cost effectively managing the Laboratory with the highest standards of good citizenship, safety, health, and environmental stewardship. The Environment, Health, Safety and Security business unit of PNNL contributes to operational success by providing efficient and effective systems, processes, tools and services that enable staff to conduct their work in a safe, compliant and environmentally sound manner.

100

Better safe than sorry: collaboration in safety-critical environments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Collaboration in safety-critical environment introduces special challenges for the tools in use, as the tools need to reliably support work tasks conducted in challenging and verifying situations. Examples of these types of environments include industrial ... Keywords: design methods, ethnographic studies, hci, safety-critical systems

Elina Vartiainen; Kristoffer Husy; Clint Heyer

2013-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

UMTRA Project: Environment, Safety, and Health Plan  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy has prepared this UMTRA Project Environment, Safety, and Health (ES and H) Plan to establish the policy, implementing requirements, and guidance for the UMTRA Project. The requirements and guidance identified in this plan are designed to provide technical direction to UMTRA Project contractors to assist in the development and implementation of their ES and H plans and programs for UMTRA Project work activities. Specific requirements set forth in this UMTRA Project ES and H Plan are intended to provide uniformity to the UMTRA Project`s ES and H programs for processing sites, disposal sites, and vicinity properties. In all cases, this UMTRA Project ES and H Plan is intended to be consistent with applicable standards and regulations and to provide guidance that is generic in nature and will allow for contractors` evaluation of site or contract-specific ES and H conditions. This plan specifies the basic ES and H requirements applicable to UMTRA Project ES and H programs and delineates responsibilities for carrying out this plan. DOE and contractor ES and H personnel are expected to exercise professional judgment and apply a graded approach when interpreting these guidelines, based on the risk of operations.

Not Available

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

102

Quality Assurance Requirements and Description  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

QjCivilianRadioactive QjCivilianRadioactive Was'fe Management QA: QA QVALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND DESCRIPTION DOEIRW-0333P Revisiol1 20 Effective Date: 10-01-2008 LarrY Newman, DlrectQr Office of Quality As,surance ~~--~-_._._- Edward F. Spr at III, Di or Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Date I/Jf/4t' , . - - - Date OCRWM Title: Quality Assurance Requirements and Description DOEIRW-0333P, Revision 20 Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Quality Assurance Policy Page: 2 of 160 Successful implementation of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Quality Assurance (QA) program is essential for the OCRWM to carry out its mission. Our mission is to manage and dispose ofbigh-Ievel radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel in a manner that protects health, safety, and the environment; enhances national and energy security; and merits

103

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Lessons Learned  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lessons Learned Lessons Learned Lessons Home Lessons Learned Database Lessons Learned The Berkeley Lab Lessons Learned Program is managed by the Office of Contract Assurance (OCA). It was developed to help the Laboratory community learn from our mistakes (and the mistakes of others) so that we don't repeat them. Through various sources, we identify events such as accidents, mishaps and near misses and translate them into corrective actions to prevent their recurrence. The ultimate goal of the Lessons Learned Program is to continually improve our performance on an ongoing basis. This is one of the central tenets of the Laboratory's assurance program. We use several different sources of information for our Lessons Learned Program. These include: The Lessons Learned database. Use the Lessons Learned database to enter Lessons Learned and Best Practices, and to view the Lessons Learned Library.

104

Environment, Safety, and Health Self-Assessment Report, Fiscal Year 2008  

SciTech Connect

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Self-Assessment Program ensures that Integrated Safety Management (ISM) is implemented institutionally and by all divisions. The Self-Assessment Program, managed by the Office of Contract Assurance (OCA), provides for an internal evaluation of all ES&H programs and systems at LBNL. The functions of the program are to ensure that work is conducted safely, and with minimal negative impact to workers, the public, and the environment. The Self-Assessment Program is also the mechanism used to institute continuous improvements to the Laboratory's ES&H programs. The program is described in LBNL/PUB 5344, Environment, Safety, and Health Self-Assessment Program and is composed of four distinct assessments: the Division Self-Assessment, the Management of Environment, Safety, and Health (MESH) review, ES&H Technical Assurance, and the Appendix B Self-Assessment. The Division Self-Assessment uses the five core functions and seven guiding principles of ISM as the basis of evaluation. Metrics are created to measure performance in fulfilling ISM core functions and guiding principles, as well as promoting compliance with applicable regulations. The five core functions of ISM are as follows: (1) Define the Scope of Work; (2) Identify and Analyze Hazards; (3) Control the Hazards; (4) Perform the Work; and (5) Feedback and Improvement. The seven guiding principles of ISM are as follows: (1) Line Management Responsibility for ES&H; (2) Clear Roles and Responsibilities; (3) Competence Commensurate with Responsibilities; (4) Balanced Priorities; (5) Identification of ES&H Standards and Requirements; (6) Hazard Controls Tailored to the Work Performed; and (7) Operations Authorization. Performance indicators are developed by consensus with OCA, representatives from each division, and Environment, Health, and Safety (EH&S) Division program managers. Line management of each division performs the Division Self-Assessment annually. The primary focus of the review is workplace safety. The MESH review is an evaluation of division management of ES&H in its research and operations, focusing on implementation and effectiveness of the division's ISM plan. It is a peer review performed by members of the LBNL Safety Review Committee (SRC), with staff support from OCA. Each division receives a MESH review every two to four years, depending on the results of the previous review. The ES&H Technical Assurance Program (TAP) provides the framework for systematic reviews of ES&H programs and processes. The intent of ES&H Technical Assurance assessments is to provide assurance that ES&H programs and processes comply with their guiding regulations, are effective, and are properly implemented by LBNL divisions. The Appendix B Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan (PEMP) requires that LBNL sustain and enhance the effectiveness of integrated safety, health, and environmental protection through a strong and well-deployed system. Information required for Appendix B is provided by EH&S Division functional managers. The annual Appendix B report is submitted at the close of the fiscal year. This assessment is the Department of Energy's (DOE) primary mechanism for evaluating LBNL's contract performance in ISM.

Chernowski, John

2009-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

105

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Radiation Protection Group: Radiation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Who To Call Who To Call Rad Training Dosimetry Telemetry Laser Safety Radiation Safety Committee Pub-3000 Ch. 21 Forms RPG Procedures RPG Internal Radiation Safety Committee Charter Purpose The Berkeley Lab Radiation Safety Committee (RSC) is appointed by, and reports to, the Laboratory Director and is responsible for advising LBNL Management on all matters related to occupational and environmental radiation safety. The Radiation Safety Committee reviews and recommends approval of radiation safety policies and guides the Environment, Health and Safety Division and radiation user divisions in carrying out these programs. The scope of its actions will generally be in issues of broad institutional concern and impact, or areas of potential high consequence either in terms of safety or institutional needs.

106

Glossary of Environment, Safety and Health Terms  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Code of Federal Regulations, are treated as variances.) EH62dd1 205. EVALUATION GUIDELINES. The radioactive material dose value that the safety analysis evaluates against. The...

107

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

functions of safety management for various work activities. The OA inspection team used a selective sampling approach to determine the effectiveness of NV and NTS in implementing...

108

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Databases  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

System) (for findings 122005 to present) Chemical Management System Confined Spaces Inventory Electrical Safety Emergency Services Program Database Ergonomics Database (to read...

109

Environment/Health/Safety/Security (EHSS): Tool Box Safety Topics  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Tool Box Safety Topics Tool Box Safety Topics A Review of Haz com standards A Single Second Accident Prevention Acetone Use and Care Aerial Work Platforms Afterthoughts and Regrets Alcohol & the Job Allergies, Antihistamines Appreciating the Hazards, Oxyacetylene Attitude and Behavior Avoid Common Office Injuries Avoiding Electrical Shocks Back Care Back Injury Prevention Backing into Trouble Basic Machine Safety Battery Charging Hazards Be Cautious with Sulfuric Acid Be Prepared for Emergencies Bench & Pedestal Grinders Blood Borne Pathogens Carbon Monoxide Care for Half-Mask Respirators Carelessness Cargo Dock Safety CDT's-How you prevent them Chocking and Blocking Cold Medication.Drowsiness Cold Weather Hazards for Propane Powered Vehicles Come-a-Longs, Hoists & Chains Common Sense & Accidents

110

March 7, 2012, USW Health Safety and Environment Conference Presentations - Improving Safety Culture at DOE Sites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Improving Safety Culture Improving Safety Culture at DOE Sites William Eckroade Principal Deputy Chief for Mission Support Operations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy USW Health, Safety and Environment Conference HSS Workshop March 7, 2012 2 BACKGROUND WHAT IS SAFETY CULTURE? * Safety Culture: An organization's values and behaviors modeled by its leaders and internalized by its members, which serve to make safe performance of work the overriding priority to protect workers, the public, and the environment. KEY REGUALTORY DRIVERS: * DOE Policy 420.1, Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy * DOE Order 450.2, Integrated Safety Management * DOE Guide 450.4-1C, Integrated Safety Management System

111

NREL: Environment, Safety, Health and Quality Home Page  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Photo of meadow and trees with Flatirons in background. Photo of meadow and trees with Flatirons in background. For years NREL has successfully maintained an outstanding record of safety and sustainability within the Department of Energy's national labs. The laboratory has supplemented this performance record with the achievement of several prestigious, internationally recognized certifications that illustrate NREL's environmental, safety, and quality leadership. In 2011, NREL received International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14001: 2004 (environment) certification and OHSAS 18001 (health and safety) certification. In addition, NREL achieved ISO 9001:2008 certification covering a portion of its operations, including Environment, Health, Safety, Security, Quality, Performance Measurement, and Requirements

112

Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review, Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review, Department of Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review, Department of Energy Laboratories - August 2008 Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review, Department of Energy Laboratories - August 2008 At the request of the Secretary of Energy, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed a Special Review of work practices for nanoscale material activities at DOE Laboratories. Representatives from DOE line management organizations - the Office of Science (SC) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) - as well as nanoscale science subject matter experts from national laboratories and representatives from the HSS Office of Health and Safety, contributed to the Special Review.

113

Department of Energy Environment, Safety and Health Management Plan. Fiscal year 1996  

SciTech Connect

This report describes efforts by the Department of Energy (DOE) to effectively plan for environment, safety and health activities that protect the environment, workers and the public from harm. This document, which covers fiscal year 1996, reflects planning by operating contractors and Program Offices in early 1994, updated to be consistent with the President`s FY 1996 budget submittal to Congress, and subsequent Department of Energy Program refinements. Prior to 1992, only a small number of facilities had a structured process for identifying environment, safety and health (ES and H) needs, reporting the costs (in both direct and indirect budgets) of ES and H requirements, prioritizing and allocating available resources, and efficiently communicating this information to DOE. Planned costs for ES and H activities were usually developed as an afterthought to program budgets. There was no visible, consistently applied mechanism for determining the appropriate amount of resources that should be allocated to ES and H, or for assuring that significant ES and H vulnerabilities were planned to be funded. To address this issue, the Secretary (in November 1991) directed DOE to develop a Safety and Health Five-Year Plan to serve as a line management tool to delineate DOE-wide programs to reduce and manage safety and health risks, and to establish a consistent framework for risk-based resource planning and allocation.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

Environment, Health, & Safety Training Program EHS-511, EHS-512...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5.11 Environment, Health, & Safety Training Program EHS-511, EHS-512, EHS-513, EHS-514, and EHS-515 LBNL Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Training Program COURSE SYLLABUS...

115

Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S): Industrial Hygiene Group...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EH&S A-Z Site Map Organization Chart EHS Internal Search EH&S Find a Lab Employee Environment, Health, & Safety Division Groups JHA Training Whom to Call Databases Ergonomics...

116

Our Commitment to Environment, Security, Safety and Health | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Commitment to Environment, Security, Safety and Commitment to Environment, Security, Safety and Health Our Commitment to Environment, Security, Safety and Health FE's 2011 ESS&H Annual Report The Office of Fossil Energy is committed to conducting our mission to achieve the greatest benefit for all our stakeholders, including our employees and the public, while actively adhering to the highest applicable standards for environment, security, safety and health (ESS&H). We are working to continuously improve our practices through effective integration of ESS&H into all facets of work planning and execution. We intend to make consistent, measurable progress in implementing this Commitment throughout our operations while striving to eliminate injuries, incidents, and environmental releases.

117

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Ambulatory Health Care BWXT BWXT Pantex, LLC DOE U.S. Department of Energy EAL Emergency Action Level ERO Emergency Response Organization ES&H Environment, Safety, and...

118

Summary Report Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Achievable CMR Chemistry and Metallurgy Research DOE U.S. Department of Energy EM&R Emergency Management and Response ESH LANL Environment, Safety and Health Division ES&H...

119

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Concerns Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Concerns Concerns TOP Last upd EHSS Safety Concerns Please use this form to submit your safety concerns. Please provide your name and email address to receive updates. You may select the anonymous option below if you wish, but you will not receive status updates. * = Required Information. Report Date* MM/DD/YY Incident Location* Building or Street Name or Landmark Requester First/Last Name Division AFRD ALS BSO CSD CRD ESD ENG EETD EHS FAC GEN CFO HR IT LSD MSD NERSC NSD PAD PSD PBD PHY SND OPS Institutional or Divisional Institutional Divisional Email Address @lbl.gov Urgency* High: Fatality or injury probable if not corrected -- Medium: Injury possible if not corrected -- Low: Injury unlikely if not corrected, but non-compliant condition/behavior Low Medium High Detailed Description*

120

Environment and safety: major goals for MARS  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Mirror Advanced Reactor Study (MARS) is a conceptual design study for a commercial fusion power reactor. One of the major goals of MARS is to develop design guidance so that fusion reactors can meet reasonable expectations for environmental health and safety. One of the first steps in the assessment of health and safety requirements was to examine what the guidelines might be for health and safety in disposal of radioactive wastes from fusion reactors. Then, using these quidelines as criteria, the impact of materials selection upon generation of radioactive wastes through neutron activation of structural materials was investigated. A conclusion of this work is that fusion power systems may need substantial engineering effort in new materials development and selection to meet the probable publicly acceptable levels of radioactivity for waste disposal in the future.

Maninger, R.C.

1983-03-16T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Office of Quality Assurance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Quality Assurance Quality Assurance QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DOE has established Quality Policy, Principles and Value Added Requirement Attributes that apply to all work and are focused on performance, customer expectations, and improvement. When properly implemented, the principles and requirements form a management system to plan, perform, assess, and improve work. The requirements are performance oriented and offer unlimited implementation flexibility. The DOE quality management system moves beyond the traditional quality assurance requirements that had become narrowly focused on safety systems, paper, compliance, and inspections. The management system is designed to link with an organization's strategic plan to support mission achievement and the delivery of products and services. The Department's commitment to environment, safety, and health also relies, upon work being conducted within an effective management system. DOE line managers and contracting officers must understand these two fundamental purposes for the QA requirements and ensure the QA Order and rule are specified in each major contract (including those contracts using the Work Smart Standards process to satisfy DOE Acquisition regulation 48 CFR 970.5223-1).

122

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & SAFETY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Additional requirements for the Qualified Person are set forth in NFPA 70E Article 110.6 (D)(1). A person can and according to the applicable codes (OSHA, NFPA 70E, etc.). DEFINITIONS A Competent Person is an individual and NFPA, has received safety training on the hazards involved with electricity, and by virtue of training

Loudon, Catherine

123

Environment, Safety, and Health Risk Assessment Program (ESHRAP)  

SciTech Connect

The Environment, Safety and Health Risk Assessment Program (ESHRAP) models human safety and health risk resulting from waste management and environmental restoration activities. Human safety and health risks include those associated with storing, handling, processing, transporting, and disposing of radionuclides and chemicals. Exposures to these materials, resulting from both accidents and normal, incident-free operation, are modeled. In addition, standard industrial risks (falls, explosions, transportation accidents, etc.) are evaluated. Finally, human safety and health impacts from cleanup of accidental releases of radionuclides and chemicals to the environment are estimated. Unlike environmental impact statements and safety analysis reports, ESHRAP risk predictions are meant to be best estimate, rather than bounding or conservatively high. Typically, ESHRAP studies involve risk predictions covering the entire waste management or environmental restoration program, including such activities as initial storage, handling, processing, interim storage, transportation, and final disposal. ESHRAP can be used to support complex environmental decision-making processes and to track risk reduction as activities progress.

Eide, Steven Arvid; Thomas Wierman

2003-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Site Map  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Website Map Website Map EHS Home spacer image arrow image EHS Division ISM Plan EHS A-Z Index Org Chart EH&S Internal Groups arrow image Environmental Services arrow image Health Services spacer image • Clinical Services spacer image • SAAR arrow image Industrial Hygiene spacer image • Group Members spacer image • Organizational Chart spacer image • Programs and Databases arrow image Operations spacer image • Admin Help Desk (EHSS) spacer image • IT Systems spacer image • Organization Chart arrow image Security and Emergency Operations spacer image • Emergency Services spacer image • Fire Department/Protection spacer image • ISSM spacer image • Site Access & Security arrow image Radiation Protection spacer image • Laser Safety spacer image • Radiation Safety

125

System theoretic framework for assuring safety and dependability of highly integrated aero engine control systems  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The development of complex, safety-critical systems for aero-engine control is subject to the, often competing, demands for higher safety and reduced development cost. Although the commercial aerospace industry has a general ...

Atherton, Malvern J

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Concerns Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Admin Help Desk Admin Help Desk Welcome to the EHSS Administrative Help Desk! This page is for the EHSS Division only and is intended as a starting point for core administrative support needs. Click here for examples of core administrative needs. Please use the form below to submit a request to the EHSS Admin Help Desk. Or, you can call x4094. Click here to check on request status. Click here to provide feedback. Examples of EHSS Admin Help Desk Please use this form to submit a request to the EHSS Admin Help Desk. * = Required Information. Request Date* MM/DD/YY Due Date* MM/DD/YY Requester* First Name / Last Name (ex: John Doe) Requester's Group* Division Office Environmental Services Radiation Protection Waste Management Technical Services Occupational Safety Industrial Hygiene Health

127

Safety Assurance of Pecans by Irradiation without a Detrimental Effect on Quality  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Pecan nuts might become contaminated with foodborne pathogens, such as Salmonella and E. coli., through birds and other potential sources of contamination that can lead to serious illness or even death, as well as financial losses. For example, the outbreak of Salmonella in pecan products in Texas caused major product recalls in 2010. Irradiation with electron beams could be an effective method of preventing potential outbreaks without changing the pecans' taste, color and flavor and without causing any risk of recontamination before the product reaches the consumer. However, when irradiation is applied alone, the shelf life of the product is decelerated because of the detrimental effect of lipid oxidation. Therefore, to extend the shelf of the pecans while assuring their safety, irradiation of pecans under modified atmosphere packing (MAP) conditions could be a viable option. This research showed that when treated with electron beams, surrogates of Escherichia coli (a cocktail of BAA-1427, BAA-1428, and BAA-1430), and Salmonella (S. Typhimurium LT2) were more resistant to ionizing radiation (higher D10 values) when packed under vacuum (VP) than under air or other MAP conditions. This research also showed that lipid oxidation in pecans (due to exposure to ionizing radiation) shows a lag phase, probably due to the antioxidants present in pecan nuts. The lag phase represents a delay period before the pecan nuts start to get rancid (increase in PV formation), and it is best described by a modified Gompertz model. Kinetic evaluation of the lipid oxidation reaction suggests that the dose level has a more drastic effect in PV formation than the type of package used during the irradiation treatment, e.g., vacuum packed versus nitrogen-packed. Moreover, accelerated shelf life studies (4 weeks at 48.9oC) showed that vacuum-packed (VP) pecans can be stored at -25 degrees C up to three years, while irradiated (at 3.0 kGy) VP pecans can be stored only for eight months, without the detrimental effects of lipid oxidation. Therefore, irradiation of pecans under air at 3.0 kGy reduces the shelf life of the nuts in terms of rancidity, but vacuum-packaging can be used to extend their shelf-life. Irradiation in oxygen packaging increases rancidity and the oxidation reaction rate accelerates with increasing dose. Irradiation under nitrogen packaging requires lower doses to achieve the almost same number of log reductions in microbial population. The use of nitrogen packaging also inhibits the oxidative reaction leading to rancidity in pecans. Although there are some drawbacks to the application of nitrogen packaging in an irradiation plant (special machinery and packaging films (permeability specifications for N2 gas)), the savings induced by avoiding recalls may make this technology worthy of consideration.

Karagoz, Isin 1983-

2012-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

Radiation Safety - Protecting the Public and the Environment | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Radiation Safety - Protecting the Public and the Environment Radiation Safety - Protecting the Public and the Environment Radiation Safety - Protecting the Public and the Environment The Department of Energy has a stringent program for protecting its workers, the public, and the environment from radiation. This web area has links to tools and aids for the radiation protection of the public. Some links apply to the clearance (i.e., radiological release) of property. "Clearance" permits real property (land and buildings) to be released from radiological control for reuse without radiation protection requirements. In addition, there is the clearance of personal property, such as, equipment, materials, wastes, and privately owned property (such as jewelry, clothing, tools, etc.) to be removed from radiological areas for continued use or reuse.

129

Independent Oversight Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant, December 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Targeted Review of the Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant December 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 2

130

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): JHA FAQ  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Job Hazards Analysis FAQ Job Hazards Analysis FAQ Topics JHA Basics Accessing the JHA Benefits of the JHA Work Lead JHA Work Groups Taking Your JHA Correcting Your JHA Training Profile JHA Basics Back to top Q: What is a JHA? A: The Job Hazards Analysis (JHA) process provides a documented mechanism to answer the question "How do I know that I'm doing my job safely?" It is a methodical analysis tool used by highly effective organizations to identify and eliminate workplace hazards before they can cause harm. Job Hazards Analysis is a tool used by LBNL to address the five core functions of Integrated Safety Management namely Plan the Work by identifying the tasks to be performed; Analyze the Hazards of the Work; Determine the Controls necessary to safely perform the Work; Perform the Work utilizing the prescribed Controls; and

131

Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, July 29, 2009 Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, July 29, 2009 This guide is a subordinate document to the Independent Oversight Appraisal Process Protocols. While the protocols provide general guidance common to all appraisal activities, this document provides additional detail and guidance regarding procedures and methods specific to ES&H appraisals conducted by Independent Oversight. DOE Order 470.2B is an important reference document that defines program requirements and, in particular, defines processes for sites to respond to identified vulnerabilities and to develop corrective action plans. The processes described in this guide are used for all ES&H appraisals, including periodic inspections, special

132

Quality Assurance requirements - Safety Analysis Reports for Packaging. An effective approach in developing QA requirements  

SciTech Connect

Application of QA requirements for packaging and transportation of radioactive materials should not be solely based on safety-related considerations. The operability of items, components, and systems must be considered as equally important. The nuclear industry has begun to recognize operability considerations along with safety concerns. This has resulted in a new approach in establishing QA requirements for packaging.

Fabian, R.R.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

Radiation monitoring system for the environment and safety project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The project RAMSES (Radiation Monitoring System for the Environment and Safety) will provide LHC with a state of the art radiation monitoring and alarm system. RAMSES will survey the LHC accelerator, the LHC experimental areas and the environment of the LHC. The TIS (Technical Inspection and Safety) division will exploit this system to assess radiation risks and to control the releases of radioactivity. In addition, it will be integrated into the control rooms of the LHC accelerator and the LHC experiments. Obviously, RAMSES will already take into account CERN wide needs to renew the radiation monitoring system around the other CERN facilities. The requirements of the system are derived from CERN's own safety standards (CERN's Radiation Protection Manual, SAPOCO), from those of the CERN's two host states and from European standards. The mandate of the project team covers the system specification, prototyping, tendering, installation and integration of radiation monitors and industrial control equipment for sa...

Forkel-Wirth, Doris; Scibile, L; Segura, G; Vojtyla, P; CERN. Geneva. ST Division

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

134

Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S): Biosafety Manual: 5.0...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Control Plans (ECPs). PIs, work leads, workers, Division Safety Coordinators, and Environment, Health, and Safety (EH&S) Division Biosafety Program personnel have access to...

135

Quality Assurance Exchange September 2005, Volume 1 Issue 2 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance Exchange September 2005, Volume 1 Issue 2 Quality Assurance Exchange September 2005, Volume 1 Issue 2 Quality Assurance Exchange September 2005, Volume 1 Issue 2 Quality Assurance Exchange September 2005, Volume 1 Issue 2 U.S. Department of Energy, Off ice of Corporate Performance Assessment Off ice of Quality Assurance Programs (EH-31) IN THE SPOTLIGHT: INTERVIEW WITH CHIP LAGDON Acting Chief of Nuclear Safety Energy, Science and Environment In a recent interview, Chip Lagdon, Acting Chief of Nuclear Safety for Energy, Science and Environment (ESE) briefly discussed the role of the Central Technical Authority (CTA) and his role in the new organization. In addition, he highlighted the challenges for and the benefits to DOE as a result of the recently issued DOE Order 414.1C, Quality Assurance. Quality Assurance Exchange September 2005, Volume 1 Issue 2

136

Software Quality Assurance Improvment Plan: ALOHA Gap Analysis, Final Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final-ALOHA Final-ALOHA Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2002-1 Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan Commitment 4.2.1.3: Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan: ALOHA Gap Analysis Final Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and Health 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20585-2040 May 2004 ALOHA Gap Analysis May 2004 Final Report INTENTIONALLY BLANK ii ALOHA Gap Analysis May 2004 Final Report FOREWORD This report documents the outcome of an evaluation of the Software Quality Assurance (SQA) attributes of the chemical source term and atmospheric dispersion computer code, ALOHA 5.2.3, relative to established

137

Nuclear Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Nuclear Safety information site that provides assistance and resources to field elements in implementation of requirements and resolving nuclear safety, facility safety, and quality assurance issues.

138

March 7, 2012, USW Health Safety and Environment Conference Presentations - Integrated Approach to Health, Safety and Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Integrated Approach Integrated Approach to Health, Safety and Security Labor Union and Stakeholder Outreach and Collaboration William Eckroade Principal Deputy Chief for Mission Support Operations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy USW Health, Safety and Environment Conference HSS Workshop March 7, 2012 2  October 2006: Secretary created the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) - To provide an integrated DOE-HQ-level function for health, safety and security - Establishes centralized corporate responsibility - Advises the Office of the Secretary on all matters related to health, safety and security across the complex - Serves as the Departmental Representative to the DNFSB Office of Health, Safety and Security

139

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health and Emergency Management...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Health and Emergency Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Summary Report Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of...

140

Verification test problems for the calculation of probability of loss of assured safety in temperature-dependent systems with multiple weak and strong links.  

SciTech Connect

Four verification test problems are presented for checking the conceptual development and computational implementation of calculations to determine the probability of loss of assured safety (PLOAS) in temperature-dependent systems with multiple weak links (WLs) and strong links (SLs). The problems are designed to test results obtained with the following definitions of loss of assured safety: (1) Failure of all SLs before failure of any WL, (2) Failure of any SL before failure of any WL, (3) Failure of all SLs before failure of all WLs, and (4) Failure of any SL before failure of all WLs. The test problems are based on assuming the same failure properties for all links, which results in problems that have the desirable properties of fully exercising the numerical integration procedures required in the evaluation of PLOAS and also possessing simple algebraic representations for PLOAS that can be used for verification of the analysis.

Johnson, Jay Dean (ProStat, Mesa, AZ); Oberkampf, William Louis; Helton, Jon Craig (Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ)

2006-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Environmental Services Group (ESG)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Services Group Environmental Services Group Whom To Call Operating Permits For LBNL Activities Publications Advisories Internal Documents Environmental Management System Environmental Restoration Program Weather Data Image of Chicken Creek The Environmental Services Group, within the Environment, Health and Safety Division, provides a comprehensive range of cost-effective environmental management services to Berkeley Lab by working with research and support staff. Services include: Your visit may be enhanced by upgrading or installing the latest Flash Player. ESG sampling activity Air and Water Quality Management Hazardous Materials Management Environmental Monitoring Radiological Dose and Environmental Risk Assessment Environmental Management System Environmental Restoration News & Updates

142

Environment, Safety and Health Progress Assessment of the Hanford Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the result of the US Department of Energy (DOE) Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Progress Assessment of the Hanford Site, in Richland, Washington. The assessment, which was conducted from May 11 through May 22, 1992, included a selective-review of the ES&H management systems and programs of the responsible DOE Headquarters Program Offices the DOE Richland Field Office, and the site contractors. The ES&H Progress Assessments are part of the Secretary of Energy`s continuing effort to institutionalize line management accountability and the self-assessment process throughout DOE and its contractor organizations. The purpose of the Hanford Site ES&H Progress Assessment is to provide the Secretary with an independent assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of the DOE and contractor management structures, resources, and systems to address ES&H problems and requirements. They are not intended to be comprehensive compliance assessments of ES&H activities. The point of reference for assessing programs at the Hanford Site was, for the most part, the Tiger Team Assessment of the Hanford Site, which was conducted from May 21 through July 18, 1990. A summary of issues and progress in the areas of environment, safety and health, and management is included.

Not Available

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

143

Safety Assurance and Rescue Communication Systems in High-Stress Environments -A Mining  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

in Tasmania, Australia [1]; Sago coal mine disaster in West Virginia, USA [2]; Shandong coal mine flood [3 to that of air. 6 #12;· Ionized air: Air ionizes as a result of fires inside the mine. The self- ignition of coal) The TTA communication technique refers to radio communication used in mines. Both metalliferous and coal

New South Wales, University of

144

Occupational health and environment research 1983: Health, Safety, and Environment Division. Progress report  

SciTech Connect

The primary responsibility of the Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) Division at the Los Alamos National Laboratory is to provide comprehensive occupational health and safety programs, waste processing, and environmental protection. These activities are designed to protect the workers, the public, and the environment. Evaluation of respiratory protective equipment included the XM-30 and M17A1 military masks, use of MAG-1 spectacles in respirators, and eight self-contained units. The latter units were used in an evaluation of test procedures used for Bureau of Mines approval of breathing apparatuses. Analyses of air samples from field studies of a modified in situ oil shale retorting facility were performed for total cyclohexane extractables and selected polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Aerosols generation and characterization of effluents from oil shale processing were continued as part of an inhalation toxicology study. Additional data on plutonium excretion in urine are presented and point up problems in using the Langham equation to predict plutonium deposition in the body from long-term excretion data. Environmental surveillance at Los Alamos during 1983 showed the highest estimated radiation dose from Laboratory operations to be about 26% of the natural background radiation dose. Several studies on radionuclides and their transport in the Los Alamos environment are described. The chemical quality of surface and ground water near the geothermal hot dry rock facility is described. Short- and long-term consequences to man from releases of radionuclides into the environment can be simulated by the BIOTRAN computer model, which is discussed brirfly.

Voelz, G.L. (comp.)

1985-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

Order Module--DOE O 231.1B, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH REPORTING |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

O 231.1B, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH O 231.1B, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH REPORTING Order Module--DOE O 231.1B, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH REPORTING To ensure the DOE receives timely and accurate information about events that have affected or could adversely affect the health, safety, and security of the public or workers, the environment, the operations of DOE facilities, or the credibility of the Department. This will be accomplished through timely collection, reporting, analysis, and dissemination of data pertaining to environment, safety, and health issues as required by law, or regulations, or in support of United States political commitments to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 231.1A Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting

146

Order Module--DOE O 231.1B, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH REPORTING |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

231.1B, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH 231.1B, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH REPORTING Order Module--DOE O 231.1B, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH REPORTING To ensure the DOE receives timely and accurate information about events that have affected or could adversely affect the health, safety, and security of the public or workers, the environment, the operations of DOE facilities, or the credibility of the Department. This will be accomplished through timely collection, reporting, analysis, and dissemination of data pertaining to environment, safety, and health issues as required by law, or regulations, or in support of United States political commitments to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 231.1A Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting More Documents & Publications

147

March 7, 2012, USW Health Safety and Environment Conference Presentations - DOE Worker Safety and Health Regulatory Enforcement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Worker Safety and Health Worker Safety and Health Regulatory Enforcement Kevin Dressman Director, Office of Worker Safety and Health Enforcement (HS-41) Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy http://www.hss.energy.gov/enforce/ USW Health, Safety and Environment Conference HSS Workshop March 7, 2012 2 Office of Health, Safety and Security Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer HS-10 HS-20 HS-70 HS-80 HS-90 HS-1.1 HS-1 HS-11 HS-12 HS-13 HS-14 HS-21 HS-22 HS-23 HS-24 HS-81 HS-82 HS-83 HS-91 HS-92 HS-93 HS-94 Office of Departmental Representative to DNFSB and Liaison Outreach Office of Communications and Congressional Affairs Chief Medical Officer Office of Health and Safety Office of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support,

148

DOE O 442.2, Differing Professional Opinions for Technical Issues Involving Environment, Safety and Health  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Order establishes the DOE Differing Professional Opinion process for employees to raise technical concerns related to environment, safety, and health which ...

2011-07-29T23:59:59.000Z

149

Energy systems programs funded by the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health: FY 1993--FY 1994  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document presents an overview of work at Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., (Energy Systems) during FY 1993--FY 1994 that was funded by the Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health (ASEH). To illustrate the programmatic breadth of Energy Systems and to establish the context within which this work was accomplished, this document also includes representative descriptions of ASEH-related work at Energy Systems done for other sponsors. Activities for ASEH cover a wide variety of subjects that are geared towards the environmental, safety, and health aspects of DOE operations. Subjects include the following: environmental compliance, environmental guidance, environmental audits, NEPA oversight, epidemiology and health surveillance, transportation and packaging safety, safety and quality assurance; technical standards, performance indicators, occurrence reporting, health physics instrumentation, risk management, security evaluations, and medical programs. The technical support section describes work in progress for ASEH, including specific program accomplishments. The work for others section describes work for non-ASEH sponsors that reinforces and supplements the ASEH work. Appendix A includes a list of FY 1993--FY 1994 publications related to the ASEH work.

Buttram, A.W. [ed.

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

150

Integrated Environment and Safety and Health Management System (ISMS) Implementation Project Plan  

SciTech Connect

The Integrated Environment, Safety and Health Management System (ISMS) Implementation Project Plan serves as the project document to guide the Fluor Hanford, Inc (FHI) and Major Subcontractor (MSC) participants through the steps necessary to complete the integration of environment, safety, and health into management and work practices at all levels.

MITCHELL, R.L.

2000-01-10T23:59:59.000Z

151

Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, July 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH EVALUATIONS APPRAISAL PROCESS GUIDE July 2009 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide Preface July 2009 i Preface The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), published its Appraisal Process Protocols to describe the philosophy, scope, and general procedures applicable to all Independent Oversight appraisal activities. The Office of Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Evaluations (HS-64) initially prepared this companion guide as part of a continuing effort to enhance the quality and consistency of ES&H oversight appraisals. The

152

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Services Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Environment, Safety and Health is a vital component within the ISC that helps Office of Science's line managers perform their responsibilities, while protecting the Department's assets and resources. The ISC assists management and ensures environment, safety, and health performance

153

Inspection Of Environment, Safety, And Health Management At The Y-12 National Security Complex  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 National Security Y-12 National Security Complex Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy April 2003 ISM OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................1 2.0 RESULTS ..................................................................................3 3.0 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................8 4.0 RATINGS ................................................................................ 10 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ...................... 11 APPENDIX B - SITE-SPECIFIC FINDINGS .................................. 12 APPENDIX C - GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION ..................................... 13

154

Quality Assurance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Assurance Assurance Quality Assurance QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DOE has established Quality Policy, Principles and Value Added Requirement Attributes that apply to all work and are focused on performance, customer expectations, and improvement. When properly implemented, the principles and requirements form a management system to plan, perform, assess, and improve work. The requirements are performance oriented and offer unlimited implementation flexibility. The DOE quality management system moves beyond the traditional quality assurance requirements that had become narrowly focused on safety systems, paper, compliance, and inspections. The management system is designed to link with an organization's strategic plan to support mission achievement and the

155

Effect of delayed link failure on probability of loss of assured safety in temperature-dependent systems with multiple weak and strong links.  

SciTech Connect

Weak link (WL)/strong link (SL) systems constitute important parts of the overall operational design of high consequence systems, with the SL system designed to permit operation of the system only under intended conditions and the WL system designed to prevent the unintended operation of the system under accident conditions. Degradation of the system under accident conditions into a state in which the WLs have not deactivated the system and the SLs have failed in the sense that they are in a configuration that could permit operation of the system is referred to as loss of assured safety. The probability of such degradation conditional on a specific set of accident conditions is referred to as probability of loss of assured safety (PLOAS). Previous work has developed computational procedures for the calculation of PLOAS under fire conditions for a system involving multiple WLs and SLs and with the assumption that a link fails instantly when it reaches its failure temperature. Extensions of these procedures are obtained for systems in which there is a temperature-dependent delay between the time at which a link reaches its failure temperature and the time at which that link actually fails.

Johnson, J. D. (ProStat, Mesa, AZ); Oberkampf, William Louis; Helton, Jon Craig (Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ)

2007-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

156

Quality Assurance Exchange, March 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 , I ssu e 1 M a r c h 2 0 0 6 I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : In the Spotlight: Interview with Patrice Bubar, DAS for Office of Corporate Performance 1 "How To" Series on Performing Assessments: Auditing Tools & Techniques 1 Lessons Learned: Quality Assurance Related to Fastener Torque Requirements 2 Washington Closure Hanford Safety Software Surveillance Completed 3 Announcements, Updates, & Activities 8 Upcoming Workshops, Training, & Courses 10 Upcoming Meetings & Conferences 9 Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E E X C H A N G E Earlier this year, Patrice M. Bubar was appointed as the Deputy Assistant Secre- tary for Corporate Performance Assess- ment (EH-3) within the Office of Environ- ment, Safety and Health (EH). Ms. Bubar

157

Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), published its Appraisal Process Protocols to describe the...

158

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety and Health...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Limit LIWG Line Implementation Working Group MDL Microelectronics Development Laboratory MOU Memorandum of Understanding mrem Millirem MSDS Material Safety Data Sheet NCAR...

159

Environment/Health/Safety/Security (EHSS): Industrial Hygiene...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Connelly Joy Fleming Ron Acord Beryllium Tim Roberts Biosafety Bruce King Vivian Xian Eileen Lloyd Chemical Hygiene and Safety Larry McLouth Kurt Ettinger Chemical Inventory Dan...

160

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety and Health...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Health FY Fiscal Year HAD Hazards Assessment Document ISM Integrated Safety Management KAFB Kirtland Air Force Base MDL Microelectronics Development Laboratory NNSA...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

documentation of OSO safety activities and observations (other than WTS records), OA's selective review of OSO activities and WTS records confirms that OSO personnel are...

162

Focused Review of Environment, Safety and Health at the Kansas...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(e.g., buildings, enclosures, safety systems, ventilation systems, alarm systems, controls, and instrumentation), PPE (e.g., protective clothing and respirators), and...

163

Using virtual environments to support electrical safety awareness in construction  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Safety is important to the construction industry. Every year lives are lost due to accidents that could have been prevented with proper training and awareness of workplace hazards. Electrical safety hazards are the cause of about a quarter of all deaths ...

Dong Zhao; Jason Lucas; Walid Thabet

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

Supporting the verification of compliance to safety standards via model-driven engineering: Approach, tool-support and empirical validation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Context: Many safety-critical systems are subject to safety certification as a way to provide assurance that these systems cannot unduly harm people, property or the environment. Creating the requisite evidence for certification can be a challenging ... Keywords: Model-driven engineering, Safety certification, Safety evidence, Safety standards, UML, UML profiles

Rajwinder Kaur Panesar-Walawege; Mehrdad Sabetzadeh; Lionel Briand

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

165

Guidance for the design and management of a maintenance plan to assure safety and improve the predictability of a DOE nuclear irradiation facility. Final report  

SciTech Connect

A program is recommended for planning the maintenance of DOE nuclear facilities that will help safety and enhance availability throughout a facility`s life cycle. While investigating the requirements for maintenance activities, a major difference was identified between the strategy suitable for a conventional power reactor and one for a research reactor facility: the latter should provide a high degree of predicted availability (referred to hereafter as ``predictability``) to its users, whereas the former should maximize total energy production. These differing operating goals necessitate different maintenance strategies. A strategy for scheduling research reactor facility operation and shutdown for maintenance must balance safety, reliability,and predicted availability. The approach developed here is based on three major elements: (1) a probabilistic risk analysis of the balance between assured reliability and predictability (presented in Appendix C), (2) an assessment of the safety and operational impact of maintenance activities applied to various components of the facility, and (3) a data base of historical and operational information on the performance and requirements for maintenance of various components. These factors are integrated into a set of guidelines for designing a new highly maintainable facility, for preparing flexible schedules for improved maintenance of existing facilities, and for anticipating the maintenance required to extend the life of an aging facility. Although tailored to research reactor facilities, the methodology has broader applicability and may therefore be used to improved the maintenance of power reactors, particularly in anticipation of peak load demands.

Booth, R.S.; Kryter, R.C.; Shepard, R.L.; Smith, O.L. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Upadhyaya, B.R. [Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States). Dept. of Nuclear Engineering; Rowan, W.J.

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

166

DOE Standard Integration Of Environment,Safety, and Health Into Facility  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Standard Integration Of Environment,Safety, and Health Into DOE Standard Integration Of Environment,Safety, and Health Into Facility Disposition Activities DOE Standard Integration Of Environment,Safety, and Health Into Facility Disposition Activities The original release of DOE-STD-1120-98 provided integrated safety management guidance for enhancing worker, public, and environmental protection during all facility disposition activities. Volume One of this Standard has been revised to provide a Department of Energy (DOE) approved methodology for preparing a Documented Safety Analysis (DSA) for decommissioning of nuclear facilities, as well as environmental restoration activities that involve work not done within a permanent structure. Methodologies provided in this Standard are intended to be compliant with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part

167

DOE Standard Integration Of Environment,Safety, and Health Into Facility  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standard Integration Of Environment,Safety, and Health Into Standard Integration Of Environment,Safety, and Health Into Facility Disposition Activities DOE Standard Integration Of Environment,Safety, and Health Into Facility Disposition Activities The original release of DOE-STD-1120-98 provided integrated safety management guidance for enhancing worker, public, and environmental protection during all facility disposition activities. Volume One of this Standard has been revised to provide a Department of Energy (DOE) approved methodology for preparing a Documented Safety Analysis (DSA) for decommissioning of nuclear facilities, as well as environmental restoration activities that involve work not done within a permanent structure. Methodologies provided in this Standard are intended to be compliant with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part

168

Environment/Health/Safety/Security (EHSS): In case of an Emergency  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Incident Stop Work Policy Environment, Health & Safety Concerns In case of an Emergency Call for Assistance: If this is a life threatening emergency, call x7911 or 9-911...

169

Environment Health & Safety Research Program. Organization and 1979-1980 Publications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document was prepared to assist readers in understanding the organization of Pacific Northwest Laboratory, and the organization and functions of the Environment, Health and Safety Research Program Office. Telephone numbers of the principal management staff are provided. Also included is a list of 1979 and 1980 publications reporting on work performed in the Environment, Health and Safety Research Program, as well as a list of papers submitted for publication.

none,

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Software Quality Assurance Improvment Plan: CFAST Gap Analysis, Final Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EH-4.2.1.3-CFAST-Gap Analysis EH-4.2.1.3-CFAST-Gap Analysis Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2002-1 Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan Commitment 4.2.1.3: Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan: CFAST Gap Analysis Final Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and Health 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20585-2040 May 2004 CFAST Gap Analysis May 2004 Final Report ii INTENTIONALLY BLANK CFAST Gap Analysis May 2004 Final Report iii FOREWORD This report documents the outcome of an evaluation of the Software Quality Assurance (SQA) attributes of the CFAST computer code for accident analysis applications, relative to established requirements. This evaluation, a "gap analysis," is performed to meet commitment 4.2.1.3 of the Department of Energy's

171

Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S): Biosafety Manual: Appendix...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

adult humans, and present minimal potential hazard to laboratory personnel and the environment. BL1 laboratories are not necessarily separated from the general traffic patterns...

172

Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S): Biosafety Manual: Appendix...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in hosts such as laboratory workers, the general public, and other organisms in the environment. The decontamination process, level, antimicrobial, frequency, and specific method...

173

ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & SAFETY Risk Management Services, University of Alberta  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of contracted testing (air quality) Biosafety Provide technical expertise and support to ensure a safe working Management Plan and ACM database management Chemical Safety Management Occupational Hygiene evaluations e.g. noise, chemical exposures, etc Air quality assessments. Laboratory Audits WHMIS / Chemical Spill

Machel, Hans

174

Quality Assurance: Library and Training  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Quality Assurance Library/Training Quality Assurance Library/Training DOE Quality Assurance Criteria Review and Approach Document (CRAD) Management Assessment Tools Software Quality Assurance CRAD QA Program Document Examples: These QA Programs are available to serve as examples from three different types of DOE organizations. Management System for Quality and Safety Management EM HQ DOE-ID DOE Nuclear Safety QA Regulation Enforcement Guide: DOE Enforcement Program Roles and Responsibilities Training, Qualification, and Orientation Materials: See also SQA Training U.S. Nuclear QA Principles, Practices and Requirements - Part I (August 2005) U.S. Nuclear QA Principles, Practices and Requirements - Part II-A Tutorial (August 2005) Suspect/Counterfeit Items Training Materials DOE-STD-1150-2002, Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard

175

Volume II, Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review of Work Practices  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Volume II, Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review of Work Volume II, Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review of Work Practices for Nanoscale Material Activities at Department of Energy Laboratories, August 2008 Volume II, Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review of Work Practices for Nanoscale Material Activities at Department of Energy Laboratories, August 2008 At the request of the Secretary of Energy, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed a Special Review of Work Practices for Nanoscale Material Activities at Department of Energy Laboratories. The Special Review included onsite field reviews of work practices at the 8 of the 16 laboratories currently performing nanoscale activities. The eight selected DOE sites, which were reviewed during May-July 2008.

176

Volume II, Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review of Work Practices  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Volume II, Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review of Work Volume II, Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review of Work Practices for Nanoscale Material Activities at Department of Energy Laboratories, August 2008 Volume II, Environment, Safety, and Health Special Review of Work Practices for Nanoscale Material Activities at Department of Energy Laboratories, August 2008 At the request of the Secretary of Energy, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed a Special Review of Work Practices for Nanoscale Material Activities at Department of Energy Laboratories. The Special Review included onsite field reviews of work practices at the 8 of the 16 laboratories currently performing nanoscale activities. The eight selected DOE sites, which were reviewed during May-July 2008.

177

Security aspects of cyber-physical device safety in assistive environments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As more devices that affect their environment come into use, their proper functioning to protect the welfare of their charges is a concern. Examples include assistive transport devices, robotics, drug delivery systems, etc. Here privacy is not the primary ... Keywords: assistive-environments, cyber-physical systems, pervasive computing, safety, security, standards

Steven J. Templeton

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

178

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Radiation Protection Group  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Radiation Protection Group Radiation Protection Group Under the direction of Radiological Control Manager (RCM) David Kestell, the Radiation Protection Group (RPG) provides radiation safety-related technical assistance to the lab community to ensure that all work is performed safely, efficiently and in compliance with applicable regulations and guidelines. BELLA facility BELLA facility BELLA facility BELLA facility BELLA NDCX NDCX Gretina Gamma particle device PET Scanner APEX APEX APEX LASER LASER Rifle, CO Rifle, CO The group: Authorizes work with radioactive material and radiation-producing machines Manages the site inventory of radioactive and nuclear material Provides coverage for: Radiological operations Radiological engineering and shielding design Internal / external dosimetry services Radiation Safety and Transportation training

179

Quality Assurance Exchange August 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office The Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) reorganized in May 2011, and within HSS, the Office of Quality Assurance Policy and Assistance (HS-23) is now the Office of Quality Assurance (HS-33) (see http://www.hss.doe.gov/orgchart.html). The Office of Quality Assurance reports to the newly formed Office of Nuclear Safety (HS-30) whose Director reports to the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer, Mr. Glenn Podonsky. While the name of my office has changed slightly, our mission and functions remain the same. The entire staff of HS-33 is excited about this change and looks forward to the new interfaces, endeavors, and challenges in the coming years. Other exciting news is that DOE Order (O) 414.1D, Quality Assurance, was approved and issued

180

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) SLAC Site Office (SSO) SSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Contact Information SLAC Site Office U.S. Department of Energy Bldg 41, M/S 08A 2575 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 P: (650) 926-2505 Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Office of Science (SC) has a NEPA Compliance Officer on staff to coordinate all NEPA compliance and support matters at its laboratories. Responsibilities include managing the review and approval of NEPA documentation of SC Headquarter programs, and working with Department of Energy (DOE) Science programs and other DOE Headquarters Program Offices conducting research at SC facilities. SC takes a proactive approach in

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Fermi Site Office (FSO) FSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Fermi Site Office U.S. Department of Energy MS 118 P.O. Box 2000 Kirk Road and Pine Street Batavia, IL 60510 P: (630) 840-3281 F: (630) 840-3285 Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Office of Science (SC) has a NEPA Compliance Officer on staff to coordinate all NEPA compliance and support matters at its laboratories. Responsibilities include managing the review and approval of NEPA documentation of SC Headquarter programs, and working with Department of Energy (DOE) Science programs and other DOE Headquarters Program Offices

182

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Argonne Site Office (ASO) ASO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Argonne Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 9800 South Cass Avenue Building 201 Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-8637 Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Office of Science (SC) has a NEPA Compliance Officer on staff to coordinate all NEPA compliance and support matters at its laboratories. Responsibilities include managing the review and approval of NEPA documentation of SC Headquarter programs, and working with Department of Energy (DOE) Science programs and other DOE Headquarters Program Offices conducting research at SC facilities. SC takes a proactive approach in

183

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Princeton Site Office (PSO) PSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Contact Information Princeton Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 102 Princeton, NJ 08543 P: (609) 243-3700 F: (609) 243-2032 Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Office of Science (SC) has a NEPA Compliance Officer on staff to coordinate all NEPA compliance and support matters at its laboratories. Responsibilities include managing the review and approval of NEPA documentation of SC Headquarter programs, and working with Department of Energy (DOE) Science programs and other DOE Headquarters Program Offices conducting research at SC facilities. SC takes a proactive approach in

184

March 7, 2012, USW Health Safety and Environment Conference Presentations - 851 Rule Implementation Improvement Efforts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

851 Rule Implementation 851 Rule Implementation Improvement Efforts Bill McArthur Director, Office of Worker Safety and Health Policy Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy USW Health, Safety and Environment Conference HSS Workshop March 7, 2012 2 10 CFR 851~ Worker Safety and Health Program 3 10 CFR 851 ~ Background *Jan 23, 2002 ~ Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 * Amend Atomic Energy Act, new Section 234 C require Secretary to promulgate regulations for worker safety and health * Based on DOE O 440.1A, Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees * Applies Only to Contractors covered under the AEC *10 CFR 851, Worker Safety and Health Program * February 9, 2006 ~ published in federal register

185

Quality Assurance Exchange, August 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

American Recovery and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 (Public Law 111-5), also called stimulus package and referred to as the Recovery Act, is an economic stimulus package enacted by the 111th United States Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama on February 17, 2009. The Recovery Act is intended to provide a stimulus to the U.S. economy in the wake of the economic downturn. The measures are nominally worth $787 billion nationwide and include federal tax cuts, expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare provisions, and domestic spending in education, health care, and infrastructure, including the energy sector. IN THE SPOTLIGHT: OFFICE OF NUCLEAR SAFETY, QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ENVIRONMENT Interview with Andrew C. Lawrence, Director

186

Environment/Health/Safety/Security (EHSS): Security and Emergency Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Security and Emergency Services Security and Emergency Services SEO Home page collage Documents Organization Chart Related Sites Fire Department Security Services EMERGENCY SERVICES The purpose of Berkeley Lab's Emergency Services is to ensure emergency resources are in maximum readiness, before, during, and after any emergency. ISSM: Integrated Safeguards and Security Management Security Updates MISSION STATEMENT: Provide integrated and efficient life safety, emergency and security services to all employees, guests, and users at the main Berkeley site and off-site facilities. Also, promote continuous improvement of the Lab's scientific and supportive activities. The core competencies of the group are: Emergency response to include fire suppression, emergency medical and hazmat response services

187

March 1, 2013, DOE/Union Leadership Safety Culture Meeting - Presentation: Safety Culture and the Behaviors Important for a Healthy Safety Conscious Work Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Culture and the Behaviors Culture and the Behaviors Important for a Healthy Safety Conscious Work Environment Presented by: Sonja B. Haber, Ph.D. Human Performance Analysis, Corp. y p March 1, 2013 Background Background * Industrial catastrophes of modern times have led to p increased attention on many human performance components * Safety statistics still attribute between 50 and 90 percent of the causes of industrial accidents to human error error * Human errors associated with industrial accidents are varied in origin BUT are generally part of larger varied in origin BUT are generally part of larger organizational behaviors Methodological Premises f ki i i i ibl i h ff i o Safe working environment is impossible without an effective organizational safety culture. o Organizational culture consists of the context within which

188

Integrating environment, safety and health training at a national laboratory  

SciTech Connect

In a multi-purpose research laboratory, innovation and creativity are required to satisfy the training requirements for hazards to people and the environment. A climate that encourages excellence in research and enhances hazard minimization skills is created by combining technical expertise with instructional design talent.

Larson, D.R.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

Integrating environment, safety and health training at a national laboratory  

SciTech Connect

In a multi-purpose research laboratory, innovation and creativity are required to satisfy the training requirements for hazards to people and the environment. A climate that encourages excellence in research and enhances hazard minimization skills is created by combining technical expertise with instructional design talent.

Larson, D.R.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

190

NREL: Environment, Safety, Health and Quality - Environmental Protection  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Protection Environmental Protection Photo of tree silouhetted against pink clouds and blue sky. Credit: Steve Wilcox Protecting the environment is at the heart of NREL's mission to develop new renewable energy technologies. Workers have a responsibility to incorporate the principles of environmental stewardship and sustainability in their work activities. When planning activities and performing daily tasks, our staff considers the potential impacts to the environment: The amount and type of wastes generated and reduced, The potential release of contaminants to air, land, or water, and The effect activities might have on NREL's wildlife, vegetation, and other natural resources. Links to our most recent wildlife and vegetation surveys are below. NREL's Environmental Management System integrates the components of

191

Environment/Health/Safety/Security (EHSS): Industrial Hygiene Group Members  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Do not enter signage Confined Space Program meter image Confined spaces are difficult to enter and exit, and are generally not designed for continuous human occupancy. When a confined space contains a hazard, they can be extremely dangerous. Every year there are a number of fatalities that occur from confined space accidents, and often this includes someone who was just trying to help rescue a coworker. Examples of confined spaces at the LBNL include round manholes, vaults, research vessels, tanks and ducts. The Confined Space Inventory provides a guide to these spaces. The LBNL procedures that must be followed to ensure your safety are in Chapter 34 of PUB 3000. If you, or a coworker, must enter a space that might be a confined space, become familiar with the LBNL procedures that are in place to protect your

192

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Thomas Jefferson Site Office (TJSO) TJSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Thomas Jefferson Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 12000 Jefferson Avenue Newport News, VA 23606 P: (757) 269-7140 Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Office of Science (SC) has a NEPA Compliance Officer on staff to coordinate all NEPA compliance and support matters at its laboratories. Responsibilities include managing the review and approval of NEPA documentation of SC Headquarter programs, and working with Department of Energy (DOE) Science programs and other DOE Headquarters Program Offices conducting research at SC facilities. SC takes a proactive approach in

193

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Ames Site Office (AMSO) AMSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Ames Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-6167 F: (630) 252-2855 Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Office of Science (SC) has a NEPA Compliance Officer on staff to coordinate all NEPA compliance and support matters at its laboratories. Responsibilities include managing the review and approval of NEPA documentation of SC Headquarter programs, and working with Department of Energy (DOE) Science programs and other DOE Headquarters Program Offices conducting research at SC facilities. SC takes a proactive approach in

194

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Office of Science (SC) has a NEPA Compliance Officer on staff to coordinate all NEPA compliance and support matters at its laboratories. Responsibilities include managing the review and approval of NEPA documentation of SC Headquarter programs, and working with Department of Energy (DOE) Science programs and other DOE Headquarters Program Offices conducting research at SC facilities. SC takes a proactive approach in

195

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Environmental Restoration Program (ERP)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ERP ERP ESG Home ERP Home Documents Photo Gallery Contact Us Links Environmental Restoration Program Welcome to the Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) website dedicated to its Environmental Restoration Program (ERP). The ERP is part of a nationwide effort by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) to identify and clean up contaminated areas at its facilities. The mission of the ERP is to protect human health and the environment by investigating and cleaning up soil and groundwater contaminated by past activities at Berkeley Lab. Berkeley Lab operates its Hazardous Waste Handling Facility under a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Permit issued by the California Environmental Protection Agency Department of Toxic Substances

196

The Office of Health, Safety and Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HSS Logo Department of Energy Seal HSS Logo Department of Energy Seal Left Tab SEARCH Right Tab TOOLS Right Tab Left Tab HOME Right Tab Left Tab ABOUT US Right Tab Left Tab FUNCTIONS Right Tab Left Tab RESOURCES Right Tab Left Tab NEWSFEEDS Right Tab Left Tab VIDEOS Right Tab Left Tab EVENTS Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis HS-20 Home Mission & Functions » Office of Nuclear Safety, Quality Assurance & Environment » Sustainability Support » Environmental Policy & Assistance » Corporate Safety Programs » Analysis Program Contacts What's New? Sustainability Support Environment Corporate Safety Programs Analysis Environment Environmental Policy Environmental Guidance Environmental Reports Environmental Management System

197

Safety Bulletins  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2009-01: Sulfur Hexafluoride Awareness Safety Bulletin 2008-03: Reporting Work-Related Heart Attacks Safety Bulletin 2008-02: Quality Assurance Concern at Wright Industries, Inc....

198

Integrated Safety Management Policy | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » Integrated Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » Integrated Safety Management Policy Integrated Safety Management Policy This Integrated Safety Management (ISM) System Description (ISMSD) defines how the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) integrates environment, safety, and health requirements and controls into Federal work activities, and oversees implementation of ISM within EM federal and contractor activities. It explains our safety values, objectives and approach for ensuring protection to the public, worker and the environment, consistent with DOE Policy 450.4, Safety Management System Policy. The ISMSD describes how EM conducts work following the seven ISM Guiding Principles, the five ISM core functions, and also incorporates the

199

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 231.1A Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

231.1B 231.1B ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH REPORTING DOE O 231.1B Familiar Level August 2011 1 DOE O 231.B ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH REPORTING FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What is the purpose of DOE O 231.1B? 2. Who must be provided limited access to OSHA Form No. 300? 3. What happens to accident records when the contract between DOE and one of its contractors is terminated? 4. Under what conditions must a work-related injury be reported to the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer? 5. What is the purpose of the radiological source registry and tracking database? 6. Which DOE position is responsible to report total hours worked by DOE employees each

200

JM to revise DOE G 414.1-1B, Management and Independent Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR, Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

Management and Independent Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR, Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety ...

2013-04-18T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Quality Assurance: Quality Policy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Policy Policy It is the policy of the Department of Energy to establish quality requirements to ensure that risks and environmental impacts are minimized and that safety, reliability, and performance are maximized through the application of effective management systems commensurate with the risks posed by the facility or activity and its work. The Department implements this policy through the QA Order and the QA rule directives to ensure quality assurance requirements are clearly specified for the broad spectrum of work performed by DOE and its contractors. Objective The objective of the QA requirements are to establish an effective management system (i.e., quality assurance programs) using the performance requirements coupled technical standards where appropriate that ensure:

202

DOE standard: Integration of environment, safety, and health into facility disposition activities. Volume 1: Technical standard  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard (referred to as the Standard) provides guidance for integrating and enhancing worker, public, and environmental protection during facility disposition activities. It provides environment, safety, and health (ES and H) guidance to supplement the project management requirements and associated guidelines contained within DOE O 430.1A, Life-Cycle Asset Management (LCAM), and amplified within the corresponding implementation guides. In addition, the Standard is designed to support an Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), consistent with the guiding principles and core functions contained in DOE P 450.4, Safety Management System Policy, and discussed in DOE G 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Guide. The ISMS guiding principles represent the fundamental policies that guide the safe accomplishment of work and include: (1) line management responsibility for safety; (2) clear roles and responsibilities; (3) competence commensurate with responsibilities; (4) balanced priorities; (5) identification of safety standards and requirements; (6) hazard controls tailored to work being performed; and (7) operations authorization. This Standard specifically addresses the implementation of the above ISMS principles four through seven, as applied to facility disposition activities.

NONE

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

SOPP-43, EM-23 Quality Assurance Oversight  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

. POLICY: The Office of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance program . POLICY: The Office of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance program requirements and expectations are documented in the EM Quality Assurance Program (QAP), EM-QA-001, dated October 2008. The QAP is the EM management system to ensure that all EM organizations "do work correctly." The QAP meets the requirements of DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, and 10 CFR 830 Subpart A "Quality Assurance Requirements." The QAP demonstrates how QA and the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) are fully integrated in EM. The QAP also provides consistent QA implementation across EM while allowing both for grading based on importance to the EM mission and safety, and for site-specific requirements to be addressed (e.g., DOE/RW-0333P, Quality Assurance

204

FAQS Qualification Card - Quality Assurance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Qualification Card - Quality Assurance Qualification Card - Quality Assurance FAQS Qualification Card - Quality Assurance A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-QualityAssurance.docx Description Quality Assurance Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Quality Assurance

205

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1990 to the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health  

SciTech Connect

Part 5 of the 1990 Annual Report to the US Department of Energy's Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health presents Pacific Northwest Laboratory's progress on work performed for the Office of Environmental Guidance, the Office of Environmental Compliance, the Office of Environmental Audit, the Office of National Environmental Policy Act Project Assistance, the Office of Nuclear Safety, the Office of Safety Compliance, and the Office of Policy and Standards. For each project, as identified by the Field Work Proposal, there is an article describing progress made during fiscal year 1990. Authors of these articles represent a broad spectrum of capabilities derived from five of the seven technical centers of the Laboratory, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the work.

Faust, L.G.; Moraski, R.V.; Selby, J.M.

1991-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

US Department of Energy Environment, Safety and Health Progress Assessment of the Nevada Test Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the result of the US Department of Energy (DOE) Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Progress Assessment of the Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nye County, Nevada. The assessment, which was conducted from July 20 through August 4, 1992, included a selective review of the ES&H management systems and progress of the responsible DOE Headquarters Program Offices; the DOE Nevada Field Office (NV); and the site contractors. The ES&H Progress Assessments are part of the Secretary of Energy`s continuing effort to institutionalize line management accountability and the self-assessment process throughout DOE and its contractor organizations. This report presents a summary of issues and progress in the areas of environment, safety and health, and management.

Not Available

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

207

March 7, 2012, USW Health Safety and Environment Conference Presentations - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-07-12 -07-12 2012 Health, Safety and Environment Conference 1:30 - 1:35 Introduction of HSS..........................................................................Carol Landry USW Vice President (At Large) 1:35 - 1:40 Who is HSS? Opening Remarks/Introductions......................................................William Eckroade Principal Deputy Chief for Mission Support Operations 1:40 - 1:50 HSS Focus Group........................................................................William Eckroade 1:50 - 2:25 HSS Panel Presentations/Q&As: Moderator..........................................................................................Earl Carnes

208

Safety Resources  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Resources Print LBNLPub-3000: Health and Safety Manual Berkeley Lab safety guide, policies and procedures. Environment, Health, and Safety (EH&S) Staff Contact information for the...

209

Environment  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment Environment Environment LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. Contact Operator Los Alamos National Laboratory (505) 667-5061 LANL has a strategy to clean up the past, control current operations, and move toward a sustainable future in which waste is minimized and other effects on the environment are reduced or eliminated. We work safely, securely, ethically, and in a manner that protects the environment We understand that the health and viability of the Laboratory depend in part on a record of environmental performance, building confidence of the public and our regulators. To gain the right to do what we do, we must work

210

Task Group report to the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health on oversight of chemical safety at the Department of Energy. Volume 2, Appendices  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents the results of a preliminary review of chemical safety within the Department of Energy (DOE). The review was conducted by Chemical Safety Oversight Review (CSOR) Teams composed of Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH) staff members and contractors. The primary objective of the CSOR was to assess, the safety status of DOE chemical operations and identify any significant deficiencies associated with such operations. Significant was defined as any situation posing unacceptable risk, that is, imminent danger or threat to workers, co-located workers, the general public, or the environment, that requires prompt action by EH or the line organizations. A secondary objective of the CSOR was to gather and analyze technical and programmatic information related to chemical safety to be used in conjunction with the longer-range EH Workplace Chemical Accident Risk Review (WCARR) Program. The WCARR Program is part of the ongoing EH oversight of nonnuclear safety at all DOE facilities. `` The program objective is to analyze DOE and industry chemical safety programs and performance and determine the need for additional or improved safety guidance for DOE. During the period June 6, 1992, through July 31, 1992, EH conducted CSORs at five DOE sites. The sites visited were Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Savannah River Site (SRS), the Y-12 Plant (Y-12), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL).

Not Available

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S): Biosafety Manual: 1.0 Introduction  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1.0 Introduction 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Policy Work with or potential exposure to biological materials in the course of performing research or other work activities at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) must be conducted in a safe, ethical, environmentally sound, and compliant manner. Work must be conducted in accordance with established biosafety standards, the principles and functions of Integrated Safety Management (ISM), this Biosafety Manual, Chapter 26 (Biosafety) of the Health and Safety Manual (PUB-3000), and applicable standards and LBNL policies. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of the Biosafety Program is to protect workers, the public, agriculture, and the environment from exposure to biological agents or materials that may cause disease or other detrimental effects in humans,

212

DOE-STD-1120-2005; Integration of Environment Safety and Health into Facility Disposition Activities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20-2005 20-2005 Volume 1 of 2 April 2005 DOE STANDARD INTEGRATION OF ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH INTO FACILITY DISPOSITION ACTIVITIES Volume 1 of 2: Documented Safety Analysis for Decommissioning and Environmental Restoration Projects U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE TS i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000.

213

Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S): Biosafety Manual: 6.0 Assessment  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6.0 Assessment and Improvement check mark 6.0 Assessment and Improvement check mark The fifth core function of Integrated Safety Management (ISM) requires that feedback and continuous improvement are incorporated into the work cycle for activities that involve work with biological materials or exposure to biological materials. This function is accomplished when supervisors, work leads, principal investigators (PIs), line management, Environment, Health, and Safety (EH&S), and others assess and continuously improve the biosafety of work conducted at LBNL. See PUB-3000, Chapter 26, Section 26.9, for a description of how LBNL assessment and improvement processes are incorporated into work with biological materials and the Biosafety Program. The bulleted paragraphs below provide an overview of assessment and improvement processes and

214

Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality Plan for the Buried Waste Integrated Demonstration Program  

SciTech Connect

The Buried Waste Integrated Demonstration (BWID) is a program funded by the US Department of Energy Office of Technology Development. BWID supports the applied research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation of a suite of advanced technologies that together form a comprehensive remediation system for the effective and efficient remediation of buried waste. This document describes the Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality requirements for conducting BWID activities at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. Topics discussed in this report, as they apply to BWID operations, include Federal, State of Idaho, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations, Health and Safety Plans, Quality Program Plans, Data Quality Objectives, and training and job hazard analysis. Finally, a discussion is given on CERCLA criteria and System and Performance audits as they apply to the BWID Program.

Walker, S.

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

215

DOE Order on Quality Assurance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INITIATED BY: INITIATED BY: www.directives.doe.gov Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 4-25-2011 SUBJECT: QUALITY ASSURANCE 1. PURPOSE. a. To ensure that Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), products and services meet or exceed customers' requirements and expectations. b. To achieve quality for all work based upon the following principles: (1) All work, as defined in this Order, is conducted through an integrated and effective management system; (2) Management support for planning, organization, resources, direction, and control is essential to quality assurance (QA); (3) Performance and quality improvement require thorough, rigorous

216

Quality Assurance Corporate Board | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance » Quality Quality Assurance » Quality Assurance Corporate Board Quality Assurance Corporate Board The Office of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance Corporate Board is an executive board that includes both senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and contractor representatives who are involved with construction, operating, and decommissioning projects. The Board acts in an advisory capacity to the EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Safety and Security Program, who is the Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board. Decisions on the Corporate Board's recommendations are acted on by EM senior management. The Corporate Board provides the management structure to integrate the independently managed federal and contractor Quality Assurance Programs into a single corporate entity. The Board serves as a consensus-building

217

Technology Development, Evaluation, and Application (TDEA) FY 1999 Progress Report, Environment, Safety, and Health (ESH) Division  

SciTech Connect

This progress report presents the results of 10 projects funded ($500K) in FY99 by the Technology Development, Evaluation, and Application (TDEA) Committee of the Environment, Safety, and Health Division. Five are new projects for this year; seven projects have been completed in their third and final TDEA-funded year. As a result of their TDEA-funded projects, investigators have published thirty-four papers in professional journals, proceedings, or Los Alamos reports and presented their work at professional meetings. Supplemental funds and in-kind contributions, such as staff time, instrument use, and work space, were also provided to TDEA-funded projects by organizations external to ESH Division.

Larry G. Hoffman

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

Pacific Northwest Laboratory: Annual report for 1986 to the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health: Part 5, Nuclear and operational safety  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Part 5 of the 1986 Annual Report to the Department of Energy's Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health presents Pacific Northwest Laboratory's progress on work performed for the Office of Nuclear Safety, the Office of Operational Safety, and for the Office of Environmental Analysis. For each project, as identified by the Field Task Proposal/Agreement, articles describe progress made during fiscal year 1986. Authors of these articles represent a broad spectrum of capabilities derived from three of the seven research departments of the Laboratory, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the work.

Faust, L.G.; Kennedy, W.E.; Steelman, B.L.; Selby, J.M.

1987-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

219

FAQS Qualification Card - Weapon Quality Assurance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Weapon Quality Assurance Weapon Quality Assurance FAQS Qualification Card - Weapon Quality Assurance A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-WeaponQualityAssurance.docx Description Weapon Quality Assurance Qualification Card More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-1025-2008

220

Signed Quality Assurance Hub Memo  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

:I I! DR. STEVEN L. KRAHN DEPUTY ASSISTANT SEC SAFETY AND SECCTRITY PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Performance Assessment, Commitment, and Corrective Action Management Program Launch In a memorandum to the FieldlSite Managers dated July 10,2009, it was announced that the Office of Standards and Quality Assurance (EM-23) had deployed a pilot prototype web-based system (Hub) to facilitate providing real-time status of Quality Assurance (QA) performance assessments and associated corrective actions and commitments. The pilot phase of the system has been completed with exceptional cooperation from the various sites involved. The system has now been transferred to a secured Department of Energy Environmental Management (EM)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Quality Assurance Exchange, June 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

V V o lu m e 2 , I ssu e 2 J un e 2 0 0 6 I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : Secretary Bodman Emphasizes Quality Assurance 1 In the Spotlight: Interview with Ava Holland Quality Assurance Manager CBFO/WIPP 1 "How To" Series on Performing Assessments: Audit Meetings 1 DOE Contractor receives the 2005 Malcolm Baldrige Award for Performance Excellence 2 SQA Work Activity #3: Software Configuration Management 3 Safety Software Central Registry Activities 8 Activities, Updates, & Announcements 9 Upcoming Meetings, Conferences & Training Courses 10 Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E E X C H A N G E Ava Holland is the Quality Assurance Manager for the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) at the Waste Isolation Plant (WIPP). Ms. Holland is responsible for

222

Safety Advisories  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety Advisories Safety Advisories 2010 2010-08 Safety Advisory - Software Quality Assurance Firmware Defect in Programmable Logic Controller 2010-07 Safety Advisory - Revised Counterfeit Integrated Circuits Indictment 2010-06 Safety Advisory - Counterfeit Integrated Circuits Indictment 2010-05 Safety Advisory - Contact with Overhead Lines and Ground Step Potential 2010-04 Update - Leaking Acetylene Cylinder Shutoff Valves 2010-03 - Software Quality Assurance Microsoft Excel Software Issue 2010-02 - Leaking Acetylene Cylinder Shutoff Valves 2010-01 Update - Defective Frangible Ammunition 2009 2009-05 Software Quality Assurance - Errors in MACCS2 x/Q Calculations 2009-04 Update - SEELER Exothermic Torch 2009-03 - Defective Frangible Ammunition 2009-02 - Recall of Defense Technology Distraction Devices

223

Quality Assurance Exchange August 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

With the help of dedicated quality With the help of dedicated quality professionals across the complex and beyond, I am pleased to announce that this issue of the Quality Assurance Exchange (QAE) newsletter focuses on hard hitting issues, as well as opportunities to explore abatement methods in regards to our quality assurance (QA) challenges. Within, you will find a brief discussion on the Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Quality Council and its Calendar Year 2011 accomplishments; an exploration of Safety Software QA activities including an overview of the annual meeting; an update on the Safety Software Communication Forum; and activities surrounding new and upcoming guides and systems. Also, you will get an inside look on the Differing Professional Opinions Process; read an exclusive interview

224

Assuring Mechanical Integrity of Refinery Equipment Through Global ON-Stream Inspection  

SciTech Connect

The development of global on-stream inspection technology will have a dramatic effect on how refinery operations are managed in the U.S. in the future. Global on-stream inspection will provide assurance of the mechanical integrity of critical plant equipment and will allow refineries to operate more efficiently with less impact on our environment and with an increased margin of safety.

John W. Berthold

2006-02-22T23:59:59.000Z

225

Software Quality Assurance: Directives and Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directives and Guidance Directives and Guidance DOE O 414.1D, Quality Assurance DOE G 414.1-4, Software Guide for use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance DOE Order O 414.1D, Quality Assurance, includes Attachment 4 addressing SQA requirements for nuclear safety applications at DOE nuclear facilities. The DOE O 414.1D was issued April 25, 2011. This Order and its associated Guide for safety software, DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements. The Order identifies 10 software quality work activities that are to be performed using the graded approach specified in the Order. These 10 work activities are: (1) software project management, (2) software risk management, (3) software configuration management, (4) procurement and vendor management, (5) software requirements identification and management, (6) software design and implementation, (7) software safety design, (8) verification and validation, (9) problem reporting and corrective action, and (10) training of personnel in the design, development, use and evaluation of safety software. These 10 work activities were consolidated from practices and activities identified in several well known consensus standards and federal requirements. Safety software must be acquired, developed and implemented using ASME NQA-1-2008 with the NQA-1a-2009 addenda (or later edition), Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications, Part 1 and Subpart 2.7, or other national or international consensus standards that provide an equivalent level of quailty assurance requirements as NQA-1-2008.

226

DOE standard: Integration of environment, safety, and health into facility disposition activities. Volume 2: Appendices  

SciTech Connect

This volume contains the appendices that provide additional environment, safety, and health (ES and H) information to complement Volume 1 of this Standard. Appendix A provides a set of candidate DOE ES and H directives and external regulations, organized by hazard types that may be used to identify potentially applicable directives to a specific facility disposition activity. Appendix B offers examples and lessons learned that illustrate implementation of ES and H approaches discussed in Section 3 of Volume 1. Appendix C contains ISMS performance expectations to guide a project team in developing and implementing an effective ISMS and in developing specific performance criteria for use in facility disposition. Appendix D provides guidance for identifying potential Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) when decommissioning facilities fall under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, Liability Act (CERCLA) process. Appendix E discusses ES and H considerations for dispositioning facilities by privatization. Appendix F is an overview of the WSS process. Appendix G provides a copy of two DOE Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards memoranda that form the bases for some of the guidance discussed within the Standard. Appendix H gives information on available hazard analysis techniques and references. Appendix I provides a supplemental discussion to Sections 3.3.4, Hazard Baseline Documentation, and 3.3.6, Environmental Permits. Appendix J presents a sample readiness evaluation checklist.

NONE

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

Experiment Safety Assurance Package for the 40- to 52-GWd/MT Burnup Phase of Mixed Oxide Fuel Irradiation in Small I-hole Positions in the Advanced Test Reactor  

SciTech Connect

This experiment safety assurance package (ESAP) is a revision of the last mixed uranium and plutonium oxide (MOX) ESAP issued in June 2002). The purpose of this revision is to provide a basis to continue irradiation up to 52 GWd/MT burnup [as predicted by MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle) transport code The last ESAP provided basis for irradiation, at a linear heat generation rate (LHGR) no greater than 9 kW/ft, of the highest burnup capsule assembly to 50 GWd/MT. This ESAP extends the basis for irradiation, at a LHGR no greater than 5 kW/ft, of the highest burnup capsule assembly from 50 to 52 GWd/MT.

S. T. Khericha; R. C. Pedersen

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

June 2010, Risk Assessment in Support of DOE Nuclear Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Nuclear Safety, Quality Assurance and Environment Information Notice June 2010 1 BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: On August 12, 2009, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) issued Recommendation 2009-1, Risk Assessment Methodologies at Defense Nuclear Facilities. This recommendation focused on the need for clear direction on use of quantitative risk assessments in nuclear safety applications at defense nuclear facilities. The Department of Energy (DOE) is presently analyzing directives, standards, training, and other tools that may support more effective development and use of

229

Quality Assurance Exchange March 2006, Volume 2 Issue 1 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2006, Volume 2 Issue 1 March 2006, Volume 2 Issue 1 Quality Assurance Exchange March 2006, Volume 2 Issue 1 Quality Assurance Exchange March 2006, Volume 2 Issue 1 U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Corporate Performance Assessment Office of Quality Assurance Programs (EH-31) IN THE SPOTLIGHT: INTERVIEW WITH PATRICE BUBAR DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OFFICE O F CORPORATE P ERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT Earlier this year, Patrice M. Bubar was appointed as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Corporate Performance Assessment (EH-3) within the Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH). Ms. Bubar holds a B.S. in environmental engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. Her extensive background includes many years of experience with the National Water Program, the Superfund Program, and the Radiation Protection Program at the

230

Guidelines for the Selection, Procurement, and Acceptance of Nuclear Safety-Related Mild Environment Motor Insulation for Rewinds  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As existing nuclear power plants mature, a need exists to provide high quality repair services for safety-related electric motors. This guideline supplements previous EPRI efforts to provide guidance on the selection, procurement, acceptance, and dedication of the insulating materials used during the rewinding of motors located in mild environment plant areas.

1994-09-14T23:59:59.000Z

231

Guidelines for the Qualification of Insulation Systems for Use in Rewinding Nuclear Safety-Related Harsh Environment Motors  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document provides guidance on the selection, procurement, acceptance, and dedication of the insulating materials used during the rewinding of environmentally qualified (EQ) motors located in plant harsh environment areas. This guideline is the third in a series of documents published by EPRI to facilitate the repair of safety-related motors.

1997-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

232

Experiment Safety Assurance Package for the 40- to 50-GWd/MT Burnup Phase of Mixed Oxide Fuel Irradiation in Small I-Hole Positions in the Advanced Test Reactor  

SciTech Connect

This experiment safety assurance package (ESAP) is a revision of the last MOX ESAP issued in February 2001(Khericha 2001). The purpose of this revision is to identify the changes in the loading pattern and to provide a basis to continue irradiation up to ~42 GWd/MT burnup (+ 2.5% as predicted by MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle) transport code before the preliminary postirradiation examination (PIE) results for 40 GWd/MT burnup are available. Note that the safety analysis performed for the last ESAP is still applicable and no additional analysis is required (Khericha 2001). In July 2001, it was decided to reconfigure the test assembly using the loading pattern for Phase IV, Part 3, at the end of Phase IV, Part 1, as the loading pattern for Phase IV, Parts 2 and 3. Three capsule assemblies will be irradiated until the highest burnup capsule assembly accumulates: ~50 GWd/MT burnup, based on the MCNP code predictions. The last ESAP suggests that at the end of Phase IV, Part 1, we remove the two highest burnup capsule assemblies (@ ~40 GWd/MT burnup) and send them to ORNL for PIE. Then, irradiate the test assembly using the loading pattern for Phase IV, Part 2, until the highest burnup capsule reaches ~40 GWd/MT burnup per MCNP-predicted values.

Khericha, Soli T

2002-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

Experiment Safety Assurance Package for the 40- to 50-GWd/MT Burnup Phase of Mixed Oxide Fuel Irradiation in Small I-Hole Positions in the Advanced Test Reactor  

SciTech Connect

This experiment safety assurance package (ESAP) is a revision of the last MOX ESAP issued in February 2001(Khericha 2001). The purpose of this revision is to identify the changes in the loading pattern and to provide a basis to continue irradiation up to {approx}42 GWd/MT burnup (+ 2.5%) as predicted by MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle) transport code before the preliminary postirradiation examination (PIE) results for 40 GWd/MT burnup are available. Note that the safety analysis performed for the last ESAP is still applicable and no additional analysis is required (Khericha 2001). In July 2001, it was decided to reconfigure the test assembly using the loading pattern for Phase IV, Part 3, at the end of Phase IV, Part 1, as the loading pattern for Phase IV, Parts 2 and 3. Three capsule assemblies will be irradiated until the highest burnup capsule assembly accumulates: {approx}50 GWd/MT burnup, based on the MCNP code predictions. The last ESAP suggests that at the end of Phase IV, Part 1, we remove the two highest burnup capsule assemblies ({at} {approx}40 GWd/MT burnup) and send them to ORNL for PIE. Then, irradiate the test assembly using the loading pattern for Phase IV, Part 2, until the highest burnup capsule reaches {approx}40 GWd/MT burnup per MCNP-predicted values.

Khericha, S.T.

2002-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

234

Developing A Safety Culture In A Research And Development Environment: Air Traffic Management Domain  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Measuring safety climate has been undertaken in many industries (e.g. oil, nuclear, aviation) over the past twenty years, as a proactive method of collecting safety information about the current level of safety in the organisation. However, there has been little work undertaken to develop the safety culture of the designers of these technological systems, to ensure that their designs are endeavouring to reach the highest levels of safety. A tool was developed to measure the current level of safety culture of designers in an air traffic navigation R&D organisation and contains 21 sub-sections under the following four main headings: i) Management Demonstration of Safety; ii) Planning and Organising for Safety; iii) Communication, Trust & Responsibility for Safety and iv) Measuring, Auditing and Reviewing. The findings indicated that the main areas for improvement are: i) the safety management system; ii) team integration; iii) responsibility for safety. Based on the survey findings some changes were undertaken in an attempt to improve the safety culture at the centre and a repeat survey is planned for April, 2005 to assess any improvements. This paper will describe the survey method and findings, the safety improvement plan, preliminary findings from the follow-up survey and lessons learnt during the change process. 1.

Rachael Gordon; Barry Kirwan

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

Quality Assurance Exchange, December 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 D e c e m be r 2 0 0 5 I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : In the Spotlight: Interview with Colette Broussard, Quality Assurance Administrator, Office of EM 1 "How To" Series on Performing Assessments: Preparing for Auditing Success 1 Lessons Learned: BNL conducts 3rd Consecutive Third- Party Evaluation of its Assessment Program 2 SQA Work Activity 2 Software Risk Management 3 Announcements, Updates, and Activities 7 Upcoming Meetings &Workshops 9 Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E E X C H A N G E Colette Broussard has extensive back- ground in DOE as a Quality Assurance Engineer, along with experience in safety engineering and environmental management. Colette joined the DOE in 1983 as a QA Engineer at the Pinel- las Plant. She transferred to Headquar-

236

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Hanford Site, March 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site Hanford Site Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy March 2002 ISM OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STATUS AND RESULTS ...................................................................................... 3 3.0 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................... 7 4.0 RATINGS ................................................................................................................... 9 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ....................................... 10 APPENDIX B - SITE-SPECIFIC FINDINGS .......................................................

237

Design and implementation of a fuzzy expert system for performance assessment of an integrated health, safety, environment (HSE) and ergonomics system: The case of a gas refinery  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The objective of this study is to design a fuzzy expert system for performance assessment of health, safety, environment (HSE) and ergonomics system factors in a gas refinery. This will lead to a robust control system for continuous assessment and improvement ... Keywords: Environment, Ergonomics, Expert system, Fuzzy logic, Health, Safety

A. Azadeh; I. M. Fam; M. Khoshnoud; M. Nikafrouz

2008-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

238

Environment, Safety and Health Progress Assessment of the Argonne Illinois Site  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the results of the US Department of Energy (DOE) Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Progress Assessment of the Argonne Illinois Site (AIS), near Chicago, Illinois, conducted from October 25 through November 9, 1993. During the Progress Assessment, activities included a selective review of the ES&H management systems and programs with principal focus on the DOE Office of Energy Research (ER); CH, which includes the Argonne Area Office; the University of Chicago; and the contractor`s organization responsible for operation of Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The ES&H Progress Assessments are part of DOE`s continuing effort to institutionalize line management accountability and the self-assessment process throughout DOE and its contractor organizations. The purpose of the AIS ES&H Progress Assessment was to provide the Secretary of Energy, senior DOE managers, and contractor management with concise independent information on the following: change in culture and attitude related to ES&H activities; progress and effectiveness of the ES&H corrective actions resulting from the previous Tiger Team Assessment; adequacy and effectiveness of the ES&H self-assessment process of the DOE line organizations, the site management, and the operating contractor; and effectiveness of DOE and contractor management structures, resources, and systems to effectively address ES&H problems and new ES&H initiatives.

Not Available

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

239

Utilize Common Criteria Methodology for Secure Ubiquitous Healthcare Environment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

RFID technology is widely used in healthcare environments to ensure patient safety. Therefore, the testing of RFID tags, such as performance tests and security evaluations, is necessary to ensure inter-operational functional compatibility with standards. ... Keywords: Common criteria, ISO/IEC 15408, RFID, Security assurance, Security evaluation

Yao-Chang Yu; Ting-Wei Hou

2012-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

CRAD, Federal Assurance Capability Plan - February 11, 2009 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Assurance Capability Plan - February 11, 2009 Federal Assurance Capability Plan - February 11, 2009 CRAD, Federal Assurance Capability Plan - February 11, 2009 February 11, 2009 Federal Assurance Capability Plan Inspection Criteria and Approach, DNFSB 2004-1, Commitment 16 (HSS CRAD 64-40, Rev. 0) Federal Assurance Capability Review Plan provides a plan, including criteria, approaches, and the lines of inquiry, to be used for assessing the effectiveness of areas relating to the establishment of a robust Federal assurance capability. The review plan covers all areas in Section 5.1 of the DOE Implementation Plan (IP) except for Section 5.1.3, Instituting a Nuclear Safety Research Function. CRAD, Federal Assurance Capability Plan - February 11, 2009 More Documents & Publications CRAD, Operating Experience - February 11, 2009

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Focused Review of Environment, Safety and Health at the Kansas City Plant - Volume I  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

at the at the Volume I Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance ISM OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ..............................................................................1 2.0 Status and Results ....................................................................3 3.0 Conclusions ..............................................................................7 4.0 Ratings ......................................................................................9 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ................10 APPENDIX B - SITE-SPECIFIC FINDINGS ............................ 11 APPENDIX C - CORE FUNCTION IMPLEMENTATION FOR PRODUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (CORE FUNCTIONS #1-4) ............................12 APPENDIX D - FEEDBACK AND CONTINUOUS

242

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management and Emergency Management at the Pantex Plant - Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pantex Plant Pantex Plant Summary Report Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy November 2002 OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1 2.0 RESULTS ................................................................................. 4 2.1 Positive Attributes .............................................................4 2.2 Program Weaknesses ........................................................6 3.0 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................9 4.0 RATINGS ................................................................................13 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ................... 14 APPENDIX B - SITE-SPECIFIC FINDINGS

243

MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT AN INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENT SAFETY & HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ISMS) CORE FUNCTION FOR FEEDBACK & CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Management assessment is required of US Department of Energy contractors by 10 CFR 830.122 and DOE Order 414.1. The management assessment process is a rigorous, preplanned, forward-looking review. It is required to be performed by owners of the processes that are being assessed. Written from the perspective of the Assessment Program Director and an Assessment Specialist, this paper describes the evolution of the process used by CH2MHILL to implement its management assessment program over the past two years including: roles, responsibilities, and details about our program improvement project designed to produce a clear picture of management processes and to identify opportunities for improvement. The management assessment program is essential to successful implementation, maintenance, and improvement of the CH2MHILL Integrated Environment, Safety, and Health Management System (ISMS). The management assessment program implements, in part, ISMS Core Function No. 5. ''Feedback and Continuous Improvement''. Organizations use the management assessment process to assess ISMS implementation and effectiveness. Management assessments evaluate the total picture of how well management processes are meeting organizational objectives and the customer's requirements and expectations. The emphasis is on management issues affecting performance, systems, and processes such as: strategic planning, qualification, training, staffing, organizational interfaces, communication, cost and schedule control and mission objectives. Management assessments should identify any weaknesses in the management aspects of performance and make process improvements. All managers from first line supervisors to the president and general manager are involved in the management assessment process. More senior managers, in conducting their assessment, will use data from lower levels of management. This approach will facilitate the objective of having managers closer to the work under review focusing on more compliance- and process-oriented aspects of work performance, while senior managers will concentrate on more strategic issues, having more access to information generated from assessments by their subordinates.

VON WEBER, M.

2005-07-26T23:59:59.000Z

244

Environment, Safety, and Health Self-Assessment Report, Fiscal Year 2008  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Processing System (ORPS), Non-compliance TrackingFour electrical safety ORPS reports were filed during FYcorrective actions for both the ORPS and DOE assessment have

Chernowski, John

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

DOE-STD-1120-2005; Integration of Environment Safety and Health...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INTO FACILITY DISPOSITION ACTIVITIES Volume 1 of 2: Documented Safety Analysis for Decommissioning and Environmental Restoration Projects U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT...

246

Environment, Safety & Health | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

the Division Director Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Phone Listing .pdf file (129KB) SC Categorical Exclusions and NEPA Documents SLI & SS Budget Contact Information Safety,...

247

DOE O 231.1B Admin Chg 1, Environment, Safety and Health Reporting  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order addresses DOE/NNSA receiving timely, accurate information about events that have affected or could adversely affect the health, safety and security ...

2011-06-27T23:59:59.000Z

248

Calibration and Measurement Assurance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... "Measurement assurance program for weighings of respirable coal mine dust samples," J. Quality Tech, 13(3), pp. 157-165. ...

249

Waste Management Quality Assurance Plan  

SciTech Connect

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory`s Environment Department addresses its responsibilities through activities in a variety of areas. The need for a comprehensive management control system for these activities has been identified by the Department of Energy (DOE). The WM QA (Waste Management Quality Assurance) Plan is an integral part of a management system that provides controls necessary to ensure that the department`s activities are planned, performed, documented, and verified. This WM QA Plan defines the requirements of the WM QA program. These requirements are derived from DOE Order 5700.6C, Quality Assurance, the LBL Operating and Assurance Program Plan (OAP, LBL PUB-3111), and other environmental compliance documents applicable to WM activities. The requirements presented herein, as well as the procedures and methodologies that direct the implementation of these requirements, will undergo review and revisions as necessary. The provisions of this QA Plan and its implementing documents apply to quality-affecting activities performed by and for WM. It is also applicable to WM contractors, vendors, and other LBL organizations associated with WM activities, except where such contractors, vendors, or organizations are governed by their own WM-approved QA programs. References used in the preparation of this document are (1) ASME NQA-1-1989, (2) ANSI/ASQC E4 (Draft), (3) Waste Management Quality Assurance Implementing Management Plan (LBL PUB-5352, Rev. 1), (4) LBL Operating and Assurance Program Plan (OAP), LBL PUB-3111, 2/3/93. A list of terms and definitions used throughout this document is included as Appendix A.

Not Available

1993-11-30T23:59:59.000Z

250

Energy Department Announces Creation of New Health, Safety and Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Creation of New Health, Safety and Creation of New Health, Safety and Security Office Energy Department Announces Creation of New Health, Safety and Security Office August 30, 2006 - 8:53am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the creation of a new office to strengthen and improve the health, safety, and security of the DOE workers, facilities and the public. The new office, called the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), will help formulate and implement health, safety and security policy for the Department, provide assistance to DOE sites, conduct oversight through rigorous field inspections, and carry out enforcement activities previously carried out by the Offices of Environment, Safety and Health (EH) and Security and Safety Performance Assurance (SSA). This move builds on a number of actions the

251

Current Safety Performance Trends  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis HS-20 Home Mission & Functions Office of Sustainability, Environment, Safety and Anaylsis (SESA) ...

252

Human Missions to Mars: Designing decision-support tools for a safety critical environment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Whitely,I. Bogatyreva,O. Johnson,C.W. Wolff,M. Townend,M. Proceedings of the 3rd International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety (IAASS) Conference, ??Building a safer space together??, International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety (IAASS) Rome, Italy

Whitely, I.; Bogatyreva, O.; Johnson, C.W.

253

High assurance smart grid  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As electrical grids evolve through the introduction of additional 'smart' sensors and actuators, cyber security becomes an even more significant factor. Information Assurance controls must be implemented throughout the grid, from large scale power generating ... Keywords: Smart Grid, cyber security, information assurance, standards, trust model

Thomas M. Overman; Terry L. Davis; Ronald W. Sackman

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

Quality Assurance Exchange, October 2008  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 , I s s u e 2 O c t o b e r 2 0 0 8 I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : In the Spotlight: Larry Newman, Director of the Office of Quality Assurance, OCRWM 1 SQA Work Activity: Personnel Training in Design, Development, Use & Evaluation of Safety Software 4 Safety Bulletin: Quality Assurance Concern Wright Industries, Inc. 5 HSS QA Activity Corner 6 Just for Fun 7 QA-Related Meetings & Conferences 8 Director's Note 8 Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E E X C H A N G E Mr. Larry Newman has broad experience in managing nuclear reactors and power plants, both in the government and the private sec- tor. He has over 20 years' experience in the civilian nuclear field. He has worked at nu- merous civilian nuclear power reactors, where he has twice been a Nuclear Regula- tory Commission (NRC)-licensed senior re-

255

Quality assurance for gamma knives  

SciTech Connect

This report describes and summarizes the results of a quality assurance (QA) study of the Gamma Knife, a nuclear medical device used for the gamma irradiation of intracranial lesions. Focus was on the physical aspects of QA and did not address issues that are essentially medical, such as patient selection or prescription of dose. A risk-based QA assessment approach was used. Sample programs for quality control and assurance are included. The use of the Gamma Knife was found to conform to existing standards and guidelines concerning radiation safety and quality control of external beam therapies (shielding, safety reviews, radiation surveys, interlock systems, exposure monitoring, good medical physics practices, etc.) and to be compliant with NRC teletherapy regulations. There are, however, current practices for the Gamma Knife not covered by existing, formalized regulations, standards, or guidelines. These practices have been adopted by Gamma Knife users and continue to be developed with further experience. Some of these have appeared in publications or presentations and are slowly finding their way into recommendations of professional organizations.

Jones, E.D.; Banks, W.W.; Fischer, L.E. [Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States)

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

Fermilab | FRA Contractor Assurance System (CAS) | Home  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FRA Contractor Assurance System (CAS) FRA Contractor Assurance System (CAS) photo The FRA CAS is governed by Section H.13 of the FNAL prime contract, executed by the FRA Board of Directors and implemented throughout the FNAL organization. This system provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of the contractor management systems below are being accomplished in accordance with the requirements of the contract. The Fermilab Assurance Council (AC) is a key element of the CAS. The members of the AC are Management System owners and/or major process owners. A major function of the AC is to identify and track issues that arise though an awareness of changes in the laboratory's operating environment, applicable laws and regulations, self-assessments and the various review processes of the laboratory. The AC executes this function through the FRA

257

Determinants of quality assurance for common good in an e-environment of man-machine symbiosis: "quality is the sine qua non of the digital economy"  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Marketing in a computer mediated environment presents numerous challenges. The emergence of internet-based business has radically transformed the global political, economic and social landscape over the past decade. Man-machine symbiosis is an expected ... Keywords: common good, e-marketing, individual quality, quality determinants, systemic quality

Ralph Palliam; Rawda Awwad

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

Environment, Safety and Health Self-Assessment Report Fiscal Year 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Training Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter Hearing Conservation Program Heavy Elements Research Laboratory Hazard ManagementManagement Safety Walkthrough Program Job Hazards Evaluations Hazardous Waste Management Management of Satellite Hazardous Waste Accumulation Areas On-the-Job Training

Robinson, Scott

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

Office of Standards & Quality Assurance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards & Quality Standards & Quality Assurance Office of Standards & Quality Assurance Hanford 100-HX facility Joe Guyette, Quality Assurance, inspects equipment ready for operations to begin in the 100-HX groundwater treatment facility. Hanford 100-HX facility Joe Guyette, Quality Assurance, inspects equipment ready for operations to begin in the 100-HX groundwater treatment facility. The Office of Standards and Quality Assurance ensures that the necessary technical, safety and quality requirements and standards are properly identified and put in place for all line-item, EM capital and major operating projects and facilities in a timely and technically sound manner. Major Responsibilities Ensure Quality Assurance (QA) standards are being consistently applied so that all EM projects are completed safely and correctly.

260

Quality Assurance: Policy and Directives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Policy and Directives The Office of Quality Assurance is responsible for DOE's quality assurance (QA) policy and requirements, and for providing assistance with QA implementation....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Safety problems of water-development works designed for land reclamation  

SciTech Connect

A safety declaration is a fundamental document assuring the safety of water-development works, their correspondence to safety criteria, the design, and active technical regulations and rules.

Shchedrin, V. N. [Russian Academy of Agriculture Sciences (Russian Federation); Kosichenko, Yu. M. [FGNU RocNIIPM, Novocherkassk (Russian Federation)

2011-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

262

Environment, safety, health, and quality plan for the TRU- Contaminated Arid Soils Project of the Landfill Stabilization Focus Area Program  

SciTech Connect

The Landfill Stabilization Focus Area (LSFA) is a program funded by the US Department of Energy Office of Technology Development. LSFA supports the applied research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation of a suite of advanced technologies that together form a comprehensive remediation system for the effective and efficient remediation of buried waste. The TRU-Contaminated Arid Soils project is being conducted under the auspices of the LSFA Program. This document describes the Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality requirements for conducting LSFA/Arid Soils activities at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. Topics discussed in this report, as they apply to LSFA/Arid Soils operations, include Federal, State of Idaho, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations, Health and Safety Plans, Quality Program, Data Quality Objectives, and training and job hazard analysis. Finally, a discussion is given on CERCLA criteria and system and performance audits as they apply to the LSFA Program.

Watson, L.R.

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

263

Quality Assurance Exchange August 2007, Volume 3 Issue 2 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 2007, Volume 3 Issue 2 August 2007, Volume 3 Issue 2 Quality Assurance Exchange August 2007, Volume 3 Issue 2 Quality Assurance Exchange August 2007, Volume 3 Issue 2 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Corporate Safety Analysis EM INITIATES QA EVALUATION PLAN In response to Secretary Bodman's memorandum "Improving Quality Assurance" (April 2006), and in an effort to improve quality assurance issues within line item construction and operational projects, the Office of Environmental Management (EM) has developed a QA Initiative Evaluation Plan. Quality Assurance Exchange August 2007, Volume 3 Issue 2 More Documents & Publications QUALITY ASSURANCE EXCHANGE December 2005 Volume 1 Issue 3 DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance

264

Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S): Biosafety Manual: Appendix E -  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Appendix E Biosafety Cabinets E.1 Introduction and Scope Biological safety cabinets or biosafety cabinets (BSCs) are hoods with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters that provide personnel, environmental, and product protection when appropriate practices and procedures are followed. Key BSC information and requirements are summarized in Section 5.6.4.2. This appendix provides the following information and requirements on BSCs: Classifications Work practices and procedures Decontamination Installation and engineering Testing and certification Information in this appendix primarily contains information that was excerpted and adapted from Appendix A (Primary Containment for Biohazards: Selection, Installation, and Use of Biological Safety Cabinets) of Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories

265

Report: EM Quality Assurance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM QUALITY ASSURANCE EM QUALITY ASSURANCE September 25, 2008 Submitted by the EMAB Quality Assurance Subcommittee Background: In Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, the Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) was tasked to dialogue with the Office of Quality Assurance (EM-60, QA) as it works to revitalize standards and institutionalize QA into Departmental and EM processes. In addition, EMAB was directed to dialogue with EM-60 on incorporating QA and engineering into the procurement process. Board members reviewed and discussed the topics of QA and EM-60's functions during their public meeting on May 7, 2008, in Washington D.C. The EMAB QA Subcommittee comprised of Dr. Lawrence Papay, Mr. G. Brian Estes, and Mr. Tom Winston, continued to explore the issues presented in May and engaged in follow-up

266

Environment  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment Environment Our good neighbor pledge: to contribute to quality of life in Northern New Mexico through economic development, excellence in education, and active employee...

267

Hanford Site Environment Safety and Health (ES and H) FY 1999 and FY 2000 Execution Commitment Summary  

SciTech Connect

All sites in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Complex prepare this report annually for the DOE Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH). The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the previous and current year's Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) execution commitments and the S&H resources that support these activities. The fiscal year (FY) 1999 and 2000 information (Sieracki 1999) and data contained in the ''Hanford Site Environment, Safety and Health Fiscal Year 2001 Budget-Risk Management Summary'' (RL 1999) were the basis for preparing this report. Fiscal year 2000 finding of Office of Environmental Management (EM) and Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology (NE) activities is based on the President's budget of $1,065.1 million and $28.0 million, plus $2.7 million carryover finding, respectively, as of October 31, 1999. Any funding changes as a result of the Congressional appropriation process will be reflected in the Fiscal Year 2002 ES&H Budget-Risk Management Summary to be issued in May 2000. This report provides the end-of-year status of FY 1999 ES&H execution commitments, including actual S&H expenditures, and describes planned FY 2000 ES&H execution commitments and the S&H resources needed to support those activities. This requirement is included in the ES&H ''Guidance for FY200l Budget Formulations and Execution'' (DOE 1999).

REEP, I.E.

1999-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

Next Generation CANDU Performance Assurance  

SciTech Connect

AECL is developing a next generation CANDU design to meet market requirements for low cost, reliable energy supplies. The primary product development objective is to achieve a capital cost substantially lower than the current nuclear plant costs, such that the next generation plant will be competitive with alternative options for large-scale base-load electricity supply. However, other customer requirements, including safety, low-operating costs and reliable performance, are being addressed as equally important design requirements. The main focus of this paper is to address the development directions that will provide performance assurance. The next generation CANDU is an evolutionary extension of the proven CANDU 6 design. There are eight CANDU 6 units in operation in four countries around the world and further three units are under construction. These units provide a sound basis for projecting highly reliable performance for the next generation CANDU. In addition, the next generation CANDU program includes development and qualification activities that will address the new features and design extensions in the advanced plant. To limit product development risk and to enhance performance assurance, the next generation CANDU design features and performance parameters have been carefully reviewed during the concept development phase and have been deliberately selected so as to be well founded on the existing CANDU knowledge base. Planned research and development activities are required only to provide confirmation of the projected performance within a modest extension of the established database. Necessary qualification tests will be carried out within the time frame of the development program, to establish a proven design prior to the start of a construction project. This development support work coupled with ongoing AECL programs to support and enhance the performance and reliability of the existing CANDU plants will provide sound assurance that the next generation CANDU plants will meet customer expectations. (authors)

Wren, David J.; Allsop, P.J.; Hopwood, J.M. [Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Ontario (Canada)

2002-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

A method for critical software event execution reliability in high assurance systems  

SciTech Connect

This paper presents a method for Critical Software Event Execution Reliability (Critical SEER). The Critical SEER method is intended for high assurance software that operates in an environment where transient upsets could occur, causing a disturbance of the critical software event execution order, which could cause safety or security hazards. The method has a finite automata based module that watches (hence SEER) and tracks the critical events and ensures they occur in the proper order or else a fail safe state is forced. This method is applied during the analysis, design and implementation phases of software engineering.

Kidd, M.E.C.

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

Safety Software Quality Assurance: Central Registry  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IMBA IMBA Expert (tm) USDOE Edition V4.0.28 2006 UK Health Protection Agency (HPA) MACCS2 V1.13.1 2004 Sandia National Laboratory (SNL) MELCOR V1.8.5 2004 Sandia National...

271

Safety Software Quality Assurance - Central Registry | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IMBA IMBA Expert (tm) USDOE Edition V4.0.28 2006 UK Health Protection Agency (HPA) MACCS2 V1.13.1 2004 Sandia National Laboratory (SNL) MELCOR V1.8.5 2004 Sandia National...

272

Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S): Biosafety Manual: 7.0 Standards,  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7.0 Standards, Policies, References, and Resources 7.0 Standards, Policies, References, and Resources 7.1 Standards 7 CFR 331 and 9 CFR 121, Possession, Use, and Transfer of Biological Agents and Toxins, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) 7 CFR 330, Plant Pest Regulations; General; Plant Pests; Soil, Stone, and Quarry Products; Garbage. Importation of Plant Pests, USDA/APHIS 9 CFR Parts 92, 94, 95 96, 122 and 130 (note especially Part 122, Organisms and Vectors). Importation of Etiologic Agents of Livestock, Poultry, and Other Animal Diseases; USDA/APHIS 10 CFR 851, Worker Safety and Health Program, Department of Energy (DOE) 29 CFR 1904.8, Recording criteria for needle stick and sharps injuries, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

273

N Reactor standby program plan; Part 5: Safety and environment FY-90 update  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

N Reactor was shutdown by order of DOE in January 1987 to permit implementation of a series of hardware and software safety enhancements. These upgrades were designed to enhance the safe operation of N Reactor and provide comparability to commercial nuclear industry standards and requirements. The enhancements were identified by a series of external independent reviews and were managed under the N Reactor Safety Enhancement Program. In February 1988, DOE directed that N Reactor would be placed in standby. Additional guidance in FY-88 directed that the reactor would be placed in a dry layup status based on preceding Westinghouse Hanford Studies directed at defining a cost effective layup method which would preserve the ability to subsequently restart and operate N Reactor if required. The FY-88 directives also stipulated that the ability to restart N Reactor in a 2--3 year period from date of notification be preserved. 7 figs., 8 tabs.

NONE

1989-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Quality Assurance Exchange, January 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 J a n u a r y 2 0 0 7 I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : Departmental Elements Respond to "Improving QA" 1 "How To" Series on Performing Assessments: Post Field Investigation Activities 1 Best Practices: Appropriate Metrics Facilitate Data-Driven IT Decisions 4 SQA Work Activity #4: Procurement and Supplier Management 6 Safety Software Central Registry Activities 7 Upcoming Conferences & Training (relating to DOE / Nuclear & General QA) 8 Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E E X C H A N G E In his memorandum "Improving Quality As- surance," dated April 26, 2006, the Secretary of Energy stated the Department's priority of implementing an effective Quality Assurance program (QAP) and promulgating a quality culture throughout the DOE complex. The

275

Quality Assurance Exchange, Winter 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

new year brings new challenges new year brings new challenges for DOE and the Office of Environmental Management (EM) is no exception, especially with the acceleration and revamping of projects due to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). A recent reorganization which has restructured EM senior leadership by adding new positions and changing reporting lines for many EM offices has brought about new objectives and challenges. In an effort to understand these changes and expectations, we spoke with Robert Murray, Acting Director of the Office of Standards and Quality Assurance (EM-23) within the Office of Safety and Security Program. In the following interview, Mr. Murray discusses the changes, challenges, and objectives for EM-23 in FY 2010. (Continued on page 2)

276

RMOTC - Testing - Flow Assurance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Flow Assurance Flow Assurance RMOTC Flow Loop Facility Layout Notice: As of July 15th 2013, the Department of Energy announced the intent to sell Naval Petroleum Reserve Number 3 (NPR3). The sale of NPR-3 will also include the sale of all equipment and materials onsite. A decision has been made by the Department of Energy to complete testing at RMOTC by July 1st, 2014. RMOTC will complete testing in the coming year with the currently scheduled testing partners. For more information on the sale of NPR-3 and sale of RMOTC equipment and materials please join our mailing list here. Over a decade ago, RMOTC began cooperatively building a full-scale facility to test new flow assurance technology, mainly in the areas of hydrates and paraffins. Today, RMOTC's test facility consists of five individual loop

277

Quality Assurance REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1150-2002 July 2012 Reference Guide The Functional Area Qualification Standard References Guides are developed to assist operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff in the acquisition of technical competence and qualification within the Technical Qualification Program. Please direct your questions or comments related to this document to the Office of Leadership and Career Management, Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Manager, Albuquerque Complex. This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... ii TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ iii

278

Office of Standards and Quality Assurance Correspondence | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » Office of Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » Office of Standards and Quality Assurance Correspondence Office of Standards and Quality Assurance Correspondence The Safety and Security Program (EM-20) and subsequently the Office of Standards and Quality Assurance (EM-23) place a large emphasis on the fact that the Environmental Management (EM) work of safely cleaning up the environmental legacy of the Cold War is performed in the Field. A primary role of our Headquarters (HQ) office is assisting the Field to achieve mission success and recognizing that we are accountable for the quality, timeliness, and efficiency of our efforts, products, and support to the Field. EM-23 also embraces the EM Business Model which emphasizes completing these support functions in a proactive manner, not simply identifying issues.

279

Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S): Biosafety Manual: 4.0 Biosafety  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4.0 Biosafety Principles and Levels 4.0 Biosafety Principles and Levels To determine which controls are required to mitigate hazards and perform work safely, supervisors and work leads must understand and apply the processes and requirements for defining work, identifying hazards, and assessing risks, as discussed in Section 3.0 of this manual. Controls are safeguards employed to contain biological agents or materials and therefore prevent the exposure of workers, other people, or the environment to agents that may harm them. In biosafety, the term "containment" describes the set of controls, including safe methods, equipment, and facilities needed to protect workers and the environment from biohazardous materials or agents. Controls used for containment in laboratories are described in Biosafety in

280

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Orientation Visit to the Nevada National Security Site - January 11-13, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SUBJECT: Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health SUBJECT: Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Orientation Visit to the Nevada National Security Site - January 11-13, 2011 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an orientation visit to the DOE Nevada Site Office (NSO) and the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) from January 11-13, 2011. The purpose of the visit was to discuss the nuclear safety oversight strategy, initiate the site lead program, increase HSS personnel's operational awareness of the site's activities, and to determine how HSS can carry out its independent oversight and mission support responsibilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1980 to the DOE Assistant Secretary for Environment. Part 5. Environmental assessment, control, health and safety  

SciTech Connect

Pacific Northwest Laboratory's (PNL) 1980 annual report to the DOE Assistant Secretary for Environment describes research in environment, health, and safety conducted during fiscal year 1980. Part 5 includes technology assessments for natural gas, enhanced oil recovery, oil shale, uranium mining, magnetic fusion energy, solar energy, uranium enrichment and industrial energy utilization; regional analysis studies of environmental transport and community impacts; environmental and safety engineering for LNG, oil spills, LPG, shale oil waste waters, geothermal liquid waste disposal, compressed air energy storage, and nuclear/fusion fuel cycles; operational and environmental safety studies of decommissioning, environmental monitoring, personnel dosimetry, and analysis of criticality safety; health physics studies; and epidemiological studies. Also included are an author index, organization of PNL charts and distribution lists of the annual report, along with lists of presentations and publications. (DLS)

Baalman, R.W.; Hays, I.D. (eds.)

1981-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1980 to the DOE Assistant Secretary for Environment. Part 5. Environmental assessment, control, health and safety  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Pacific Northwest Laboratory's (PNL) 1980 annual report to the DOE Assistant Secretary for Environment describes research in environment, health, and safety conducted during fiscal year 1980. Part 5 includes technology assessments for natural gas, enhanced oil recovery, oil shale, uranium mining, magnetic fusion energy, solar energy, uranium enrichment and industrial energy utilization; regional analysis studies of environmental transport and community impacts; environmental and safety engineering for LNG, oil spills, LPG, shale oil waste waters, geothermal liquid waste disposal, compressed air energy storage, and nuclear/fusion fuel cycles; operational and environmental safety studies of decommissioning, environmental monitoring, personnel dosimetry, and analysis of criticality safety; health physics studies; and epidemiological studies. Also included are an author index, organization of PNL charts and distribution lists of the annual report, along with lists of presentations and publications. (DLS)

Baalman, R.W.; Hays, I.D. (eds.)

1981-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S): Biosafety Manual: Appendix A -  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

A A Glossary Terms, acronyms, and abbreviations used in this manual are defined in this appendix. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a virus that infects humans and some other primate species. AAV is a very attractive candidate for creating viral vectors because it is not known to cause disease in humans, can infect both dividing and nondividing cells, and may incorporate its genome into that of the host cell. American Biological Safety Association (ABSA) is a professional association that promotes biosafety as a scientific discipline and serves the growing needs of biosafety professionals throughout the world. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) that is responsible for protecting and promoting U.S. agricultural health, administering the Animal Welfare Act,

284

Environment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

...O. Jonas, Corrosion of Steam Turbines, Corrosion: Environments and Industries, Vol 13C, ASM Handbook, ASM International, 2006, p 469??476...

285

2005 Elec. Safety-rev1.pmd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory ORPS Occurrence Reporting and Processing System OSHA Occupational Safety and health...

286

Micronutrients Measurement Quality Assurance Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Hpital Purpan, Toulouse, France Life Sciences Group ... Measurement Quality Assurance Program: Helping ... to Improve their Long-term Measurement ...

2012-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

287

Waste Management Quality Assurance Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Department of Energy (DOE) Order 414.1C, Quality Assurance,DOE, federal, and state regulations and compliance orders.

Waste Management Group

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

Waste Management Quality Assurance Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

PROGRAM .4 Organizational Structure ..4 Management Quality Assurance Functions 5 Planning 5 2.0 PERSONNEL TRAINING AND

Waste Management Group

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

Environmental and radiological safety studies: interaction of /sup 238/PuO/sub 2/ heat sources with terrestrial and aquatic environments. Progress report, April 1- June 30, 1982  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Although existing radioisotope thermoelectric generator designs have proved more than adequately safe, more information is continually sought about the heat sources to improve their safety. The work here includes studies of the effects on the heat sources on terrestrial and aquatic environments and also of the effects of the heat sources on various simulated environments. This progress report presents recent data from environmental chamber and aquatic experiments and gives the present status of the experiments.

Matlack, G.M.; Patterson, J.H.; Stalnaker, N.D.

1982-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Environmental and radiological safety studies: Interaction of /sup 238/PuO/sub 2/ heat sources with terrestrial and aquatic environments. Progress report, September 26-December 25, 1981  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Although existing radioisotope thermoelectric generator designs have proved more than adequately safe, more information is continually sought about the heat sources to improve their safety. The work here includes studies of the effects on the heat sources of terrestrial and aquatic environments and also of the effect of the heat sources on various simulated environments. This progress report presents recent data from environmental chamber and aquatic experiments and gives the present status of the experiments.

Matlack, G.M.; Patterson, J.H.

1982-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

291

Measurement quality assurance  

SciTech Connect

The quality of a radiation protection program can be no better than the quality of the measurements made to support it. In many cases, that quality is unknown and is merely implied on the basis of a calibration of a measuring instrument. If that calibration is inappropriate or is performed improperly, the measurement result will be inaccurate and misleading. Assurance of measurement quality can be achieved if appropriate procedures are followed, including periodic quality control actions that demonstrate adequate performance. Several national measurement quality assurance (MQA) programs are operational or under development in specific areas. They employ secondary standards laboratories that provide a high-quality link between the National Bureau of Standards and measurements made at the field use level. The procedures followed by these secondary laboratories to achieve MQA will be described, as well as plans for similar future programs. A growing general national interest in quality assurance, combined with strong specific motivations for MQA in the area of ionizing radiation, will provide continued demand for appropriate national programs. Such programs must, however, employ procedures that are cost effective and must be developed with participation by all affected parties.

Eisenhower, E.H.

1988-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

EM Quality Assurance Assessment Schedule FY 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DR. STFDlN L. KRAHN DR. STFDlN L. KRAHN DEPUTY ASSlS SAFETY ENVIRONhtENTAL MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: U p d a t e d F i Year 2010 Environmental Mmagemmt Quality Assurance Assessment Schedule AWhed for planuing and coordination purposes is t h e updated Ql&ty Amtrance {OA) asesmmt schedule for the remainder of fiscal year $Y) 2010. . - , The schedule is organized per the various types of QA asmmum@ that will k led by the Office of S t a n e and Quality Assurance (EM-23) or the Field elements. Please provide your feedbadc on the suggested self-atxwssment dates by Monday, Apd 12,2010 (item 2, below). Tht scope a n d tim'mg of plaoned asseasments are designed to be relevant, timely, and & I value to enhaace QA performame of specific projects. EM-23 has developed the attached oversight prioritization methodology plan that takes into

293

Chemical analysis quality assurance at the ICPP  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document discusses the chemical analysis quality assurance program at the ICPP which involves records management, analytical methods quality control, analysis procedures and training and qualification. Since 1979, the major portion of the quality assurance program has been implemented on a central analytical computer system. The individual features provided by the system are storage, retrieval, and search capabilities over all general request and sample analysis information, automatic method selection for all process streams, automation of all method calculations, automatic assignment of bias and precision estimates at all analysis levels, with-method-use requalification, untrained or unqualified analyst method lockout, statistical testing of all process stream results for replicate agreement, automatic testing of process results against pre- established operating, safety, or failure limits at varying confidence levels, and automatic transfer and report of all analysis data plus all statistical testing to the Production Department.

Hand, R.L.

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

294

State Energy Program Assurances - Mississippi Governor Barbour...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Mississippi Governor Barbour State Energy Program Assurances - Mississippi Governor Barbour Letter from Mississippi Governor Barbour providing...

295

State Energy Program Assurances - Washington Governor Gregoire...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Washington Governor Gregoire State Energy Program Assurances - Washington Governor Gregoire Letter from Washington Governor Gregoire providing...

296

Environment  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment Environment Environment Photo Gallery A repository for images showing environmental cleanup and protection efforts around the Lab. Click thumbnails to enlarge. Photos arranged by most recent first, horizontal formats before vertical. See Flickr for more sizes and details. Workers sample contents of LANL's Material Disposal Area B (MDA-B) before excavation Workers sample contents of LANL's Material Disposal Area B (MDA-B) before excavation Shipment #159 of TRU waste from LANL to WIPP, 2011 Shipment #159 of TRU waste from LANL to WIPP, 2011 Kathy Johns-Hughes oversees Los Alamos National Laboratory's TRU Waste Program Kathy Johns-Hughes oversees Los Alamos National Laboratory's TRU Waste Program Worker moves drums of transuranic (TRU) waste at a staging area

297

Safety, Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety, Security Safety, Security Safety, Security LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. Contact Operator Los Alamos National Laboratory (505) 667-5061 We do not compromise safety for personal, programmatic, or operational reasons. Safety: we integrate safety, security, and environmental concerns into every step of our work Our commitments We conduct our work safely and responsibly to achieve our mission. We ensure a safe and healthful environment for workers, contractors, visitors, and other on-site personnel. We protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. We do not compromise safety for personal, programmatic, or

298

Recovery Act: Enhancing State Energy Assurance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Enhancing State Enhancing State Energy Assurance Recovery Act: Enhancing State Energy Assurance States are using these funds to plan for energy supply disruption risks and vulnerabilities to lessen the devastating impact that such incidents can have on the economy and the health and safety of the public. Each state is required to track energy emergencies to assess the restoration and recovery times of any supply disruptions; to train appropriate personnel on energy infrastructure and supply systems; and conduct and participate in state and regional energy emergency exercises to evaluate the effectiveness of their energy assurance plans. The awards for energy assurance capabilities also help states address cyber security concerns and prepare for the challenges of integrating smart grid

299

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety and Health Management and Emergency Management at the Sandia National Laboratories - New Mexico - Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sandia National Sandia National Laboratories - New Mexico Summary Report Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy February 2003 OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1 2.0 RESULTS ................................................................................. 3 2.1 Positive Attributes ............................................................ 3 2.2 Program Weaknesses ........................................................ 5 3.0 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................9 4.0 RATINGS ................................................................................13 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ...................

300

Summary Report Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health and Emergency Management at the Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Alamos Los Alamos National Laboratory Summary Report Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy April 2002 OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1 2.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................... 3 2.1 Positive Program Attributes ...................................................... 3 2.2 Program Weaknesses .................................................................. 6 3.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................ 9 4.0 RATINGS ........................................................................................... 13 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

73 Federal Register 73 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 48 / Monday, March 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule

302

Technical and Analytical Support Services to the Office of Environmental Analysis, Office of Environment, Safety and Health. Final report  

SciTech Connect

The primary purpose of this contract was to provide technical analyses, studies, and reviews related to land use/water issues and energy resource development in support of the activities of the Office of Environmental Analysis, Office of Environment, Safety and Health. Tasks under this contract included: Issue Papers. Energetics provided issue papers on a number of specific energy and environmental issue areas. Each issue paper consisted of a systematic review and analysis of major factors (technical, legal, environmental, economic, energy, health and social) that could enter into DOE`s environmental/energy policy decisions; Special Analyses. Energetics conducted special in-depth technical analyses as requested by the Contracting Officer`s Technical Representative (COTR); and Critical Review and Evaluation of Program Reports. Energetics performed critical reviews of a number of technical reports arising from DOE program activities. These documents included issue papers and reports resulting from special technical analyses of specific issues, technologies, or broad areas of concern. Reviews focused on both the technical and programmatic impact of the report. Energetics made recommendations and gave input to assist DOE in determining the environmental impacts of energy policies and projects.

NONE

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

303

Quality Assurance Exchange March 2011, Volume 7 Issue 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Software Development and Success Through Software Development and Success Through Project Management and Six Sigma Director's Note The Office of Quality Assurance Policy and Assistance (HS-23) began in 2011 with a focus on the revision to Department of Energy (DOE) Order (O) 414.1C, Quality Assurance. In November 2009, the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) began the reform effort to streamline requirements and eliminate directives that do not add value to safety and security. DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, is on an expedited review schedule. I am happy to report that as of February 11, 2011, DOE O 414.1D has completed the RevCom process. This version of the Order has been streamlined, requirements have been clarified, and where appropriate, requirements that are covered in other directives are simply referred to

304

Analysis of environment, safety, and health (ES{ampersand}H) management systems for Department of Energy (DOE) Defense Programs (DP) facilities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary analysis and comparison of various environment, safety, and health (ES&H) management systems required of, or suggested for use by, the Departrnent of Energy Defense Programs` sites. The summary analysis is provided by means of a comparison matrix, a set of Vean diagrams that highlights the focus of the systems, and an `End Gate` filter diagram that integrates the three Vean diagrams. It is intended that this paper will act as a starting point for implementing a particular system or in establishing a comprehensive site-wide integrated ES&H management system. Obviously, the source documents for each system would need to be reviewed to assure proper implementation of a particular system. The matrix compares nine ES&H management systems against a list of elements generated by identifying the unique elements of all the systems. To simplify the matrix, the elements are listed by means of a brief title. An explanation of the matrix elements is provided in Attachment 2 entitled, `Description of System Elements.` The elements are categorized under the Total Quality Management (TQM) `Plan, Do, Check, Act` framework with the added category of `Policy`. (The TQM concept is explained in the `DOE Quality Management implementation Guidelines,` July 1997 (DOE/QM- 0008)). The matrix provides a series of columns and rows to compare the unique elements found in each of the management systems. A `V` is marked if the element is explicitly identified as part of the particular ES&H management system. An `X` is marked if the element is not found in the particular ES&H management system, or if it is considered to be inadequately addressed. A `?` is marked if incorporation of the element is not clear. Attachment I provides additional background information which explains the justification for the marks in the matrix cells. Through the Vean diagrams and the `End Gate` filter in Section 3, the paper attempts to pictorially display the focus of each system with respect to ES&H, the hazard of concern, and any limitations with respect to the TQM categories. A summary evaluation and explanation of each of the systems is provided in Section 4 of the paper. Several other ES&H systems were reviewed in preparation of the paper, but were not specifically included as a system in this matrix. Only those ES&H management systems that are potentially applicable to DOE Defense Program sites were included as part of the matrix comparison. A description of other ES&H management systems that were evaluated, but not specifically incorporated in this matrix comparison, are provided in Attachment 3 entitled, `Other ES&H Management Systems Reviewed.` In the past, it has been difficult integrating ES&H into work planning for several reasons. One barrier to this integration has been the complexity caused by the existence of several `stove pipe` ES&H systems. By analyzing the unique elements of the various ES&H systems, as well as their strengths and limitations, and their similarities and differences, it is envisioned that this paper will aid in facilitating the integration of ES&H into work planning. This paper was developed by the Office of Defense Programs (DP-45) and all questions or comments should be directed to Anthony Neglia of that office at (301) 903-3531 or Anthony.Neglia@dp.doe.gov.

Neglia, A. V., LLNL

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

International Quality Assurance Standards (Presentation)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Tests to make quantitative predictions about photovoltaic (PV) modules are needed. This presentation proposes the creation of international quality assurance standards for PV modules.

Kurtz, S.; Hacke, P.; Wohlgemuth, J.; Kempe, M.; Yamamichi, M.

2011-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

306

Quality Assurance Exchange August 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for DOE personnel who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of safety software that includes: * Safety system software; * Safety and hazard...

307

Navy Heat Source Safety Tests  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of these tests was to validate the integrity of the Navy Heat Source after imposing conditions which might, in the extreme, be encountered singly or serially so that safety would be assured.

Anderson, C. G.; Cartmill, W. B.

1975-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

308

Safety Basis Information System  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Analysis (SESA) SESA Home Mission & Functions Office of Sustainability, Environment, Safety and Anaylsis (SESA) Sustainability Support Environmental Policy & Assistance ...

309

Program desk manual for occupational safety and health -- U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations, Office of Environment Safety and Health  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The format of this manual is designed to make this valuable information easily accessible to the user as well as enjoyable to read. Each chapter contains common information such as Purpose, Scope, Policy and References, as well as information unique to the topic at hand. This manual can also be provided on a CD or Hanford Internet. Major topics include: Organization and program for operational safety; Occupational medicine; Construction and demolition; Material handling and storage; Hoisting and rigging; Explosives; Chemical hazards; Gas cylinders; Electrical; Boiler and pressure vessels; Industrial fire protection; Industrial hygiene; and Safety inspection checklist.

Musen, L.G.

1998-08-27T23:59:59.000Z

310

Technical Basis for U. S. Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy, DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Basis for U. S. Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy, DOE Policy 420.1 This document provides the technical basis for the Department of Energy (DOE) Policy (P) 420.1, Nuclear Safety Policy, dated 2-8-2011. It includes an analysis of the revised Policy to determine whether it provides the necessary and sufficient high-level expectations that will lead DOE to establish and implement appropriate requirements to assure protection of the public, workers, and the environment from the hazards of DOE's operation of nuclear facilities. In developing the revised Policy and performing this analysis, DOE reviewed the current Nuclear Safety Policy (Secretary of Energy Notice [SEN] 35-91, Nuclear Safety Policy) and safety policies established by other safety

311

Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 December 2000 Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites The initial joint review was conducted between October 15 and December 15, 2000, by the Offices of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), Security and Emergency Operations (SO), and Environment, Safety and Health (EH). The purpose of the initial joint review was to assess the abilities of DOE sites to prevent and respond to wildland fires and provide recommendations for pertinent site-specific and DOE-wide improvements. Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0760

312

EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I I ~ r h b 1tv2om m ~ e e of Environments1M a ~ f p ~ ~ ! n n t (EM) Snbjeet: E M Quality Asamnee Program (QBP) Policies, Procedures, APPROVED: and Plans Principal Deputy Secretary for Environmental Management 1.0 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE The purpose of this document is to describe the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance Program (QAP). The QAP is the EM management system to ensure we "do work correctly." The QAP meets the requirements of DOE 0 414. IC, Quality Assurance, and 10 CFR 830 Subpart A "Quality Assurance Requirements." It is intended that the requirements of DOE 0 414.1C and 10 CFR 830 Subpart A are met by implementing this QAP. The QAP provides EM expectations for implementing quality assurance (QA) across the EM complex. The QAP

313

Safety Communications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Communications Communications New Staff & Guests Safety Topics ISM Plan Safety Communications Questions about safety and environmental compliance should first be directed to your supervisor or work lead. The Life Sciences Division Safety Coordinator Scott Taylor at setaylor@lbl.gov , 486-6133 (office), or (925) 899-4355 (cell); and Facilities Manager Peter Marietta at PMarietta@lbl.gov, 486-6031 (office), or 967-6596 (cell), are also sources of information. Your work group has a representative to the Division Environment, Health, & Safety Committee. This representative can provide safety guidance and offer a conduit for you to pass on your concerns or ideas. A list of current representatives is provided below. Additional safety information can be obtained on-line from the Berkeley Lab

314

The Office of Health, Safety and Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sustainability, Environment, Safety and Anaylsis (SESA) Sustainability Support Environmental Policy & Assistance Corporate Safety Programs Analysis Program Contacts...

315

LANL Safeguards and Security Assurance Program. Revision 6  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Safeguards and Security (S and S) Assurance Program provides a continuous quality improvement approach to ensure effective, compliant S and S program implementation throughout the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Any issues identified through the various internal and external assessments are documented, tracked and closed using the Safeguards and Security Issue Management Program. The Laboratory utilizes an integrated S and S systems approach to protect US Department of Energy (DOE) interests from theft or diversion of special nuclear material (SNM), sabotage, espionage, loss or theft of classified/controlled matter or government property, and other hostile acts that may cause unacceptable impacts on national security, health and safety of employees and the public, and the environment. This document explains the basis, scope, and conduct of the S and S process to include: self-assessments, issue management, risk assessment, and root cause analysis. It also provides a discussion of S and S topical areas, roles and responsibilities, process flow charts, minimum requirements, methodology, terms, and forms.

NONE

1995-04-03T23:59:59.000Z

316

Quality Assurance Exchange Setpebmer 2007, Volume 3 Issue 3 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Setpebmer 2007, Volume 3 Issue 3 Setpebmer 2007, Volume 3 Issue 3 Quality Assurance Exchange Setpebmer 2007, Volume 3 Issue 3 Quality Assurance Exchange Setpebmer 2007, Volume 3 Issue 3 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Corporate Safety Analysis HSS FOCUS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE It permeates every aspect of our work from the shortest memorandum to the most complex nuclear operation, and yet it is often misunderstood, undervalued, and overlooked as an integral component of line management. "It" is Quality Assurance -- in principle and in application - and "it" is at the heart of every successful corporation, institution, and Federal agency. Quality Assurance Exchange Setpebmer 2007, Volume 3 Issue 3 More Documents & Publications Quality Assurance Exchange September 2005, Volume 1 Issue 2

317

Quality Assurance Exchange August 2011, Volume 7 Issue 2 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance Exchange August 2011, Volume 7 Issue 2 Quality Assurance Exchange August 2011, Volume 7 Issue 2 Quality Assurance Exchange August 2011, Volume 7 Issue 2 Quality Assurance Order Revised As part of the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Directives reform initiative, DOE issued a revision to DOE Order (O) 414.1C,Quality Assurance on April 25, 2011. The DOE Quality Council, DOE Departmental Elements, Site Offices, and contractors participated in the review and update ofthe Order. DOE O 414.1D does not impose any new requirements, however, its content was streamlined; existing requirements and responsibilities were clarified; andthe sections were reorganized to reduce redundancy. Quality Assurance Exchange August 2011 Vol 7 Issue 2 More Documents & Publications

318

Safety System Oversight Workshop (May 12-13, 2010) Presentation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facility Representatives and Safety System Oversight Personnel DOE Oversight Policy DOE P 226.1A, Department of Energy Oversight Policy Comprehensive & rigorous assurance system at...

319

Order Module--SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE FOR USE WITH 10 CFR 830, SUBPART A,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE FOR USE WITH 10 CFR 830, SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE FOR USE WITH 10 CFR 830, SUBPART A, QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND DOE O 414.1C, QUALITY ASSURANCE Order Module--SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE FOR USE WITH 10 CFR 830, SUBPART A, QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND DOE O 414.1C, QUALITY ASSURANCE According to DOE-STD-1146-2007, General Technical Base Qualification Standard, this module was to summarize the quality assurance information found in attachments 3, 4, and 5, of DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, and its supporting guides, DOE G 414.1-3, Suspect/Counterfeit Items Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1B, Quality Assurance, DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O

320

State Energy Program Assurances - Pennsylvania Governor Rendell...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pennsylvania Governor Rendell State Energy Program Assurances - Pennsylvania Governor Rendell Letter from Pennsylvania Governor Rendell providing Secretary Chu with the assurances...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

State Energy Program Assurances - Connecticut Governor Rell ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Connecticut Governor Rell State Energy Program Assurances - Connecticut Governor Rell Letter from Connecticut Governor Rell providing Secretary...

322

State Energy Program Assurances - Colorado Governor Ritter |...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Colorado Governor Ritter State Energy Program Assurances - Colorado Governor Ritter Letter from Colorado Governor Ritter providing Secretary Chu...

323

State Energy Program Assurances - Michigan Governor Granholm...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Michigan Governor Granholm State Energy Program Assurances - Michigan Governor Granholm Letter from Michigan Governor Granholm providing Secretary...

324

State Energy Program Assurances - Vermont Governor Douglas |...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Vermont Governor Douglas State Energy Program Assurances - Vermont Governor Douglas Letter from Vermont Governor Douglas providing Secretary Chu...

325

State Energy Program Assurances - Louisiana Governor Jindal ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Louisiana Governor Jindal State Energy Program Assurances - Louisiana Governor Jindal Letter from Louisiana Governor Jindal providing Secretary...

326

State Energy Program Assurances - Ohio Governor Strickland |...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ohio Governor Strickland State Energy Program Assurances - Ohio Governor Strickland Letter from Ohio Governor Strickland Sanford providing Secretary Chu with the assurances needed...

327

Power Assure | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

energy efficiency in data centers. The company manages both IT and mechanical electrical load to match IT demand. References Power Assure1 LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase...

328

Safeguarding Health Information: Building Assurance through ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This event page is for the 2013 Safeguarding Health Information: Building Assurance through HIPAA Security conference. ...

2013-05-28T23:59:59.000Z

329

NIF Projects Controls and Information Systems Software Quality Assurance Plan  

SciTech Connect

Quality achievement for the National Ignition Facility (NIF) and the National Ignition Campaign (NIC) is the responsibility of the NIF Projects line organization as described in the NIF and Photon Science Directorate Quality Assurance Plan (NIF QA Plan). This Software Quality Assurance Plan (SQAP) is subordinate to the NIF QA Plan and establishes quality assurance (QA) activities for the software subsystems within Controls and Information Systems (CIS). This SQAP implements an activity level software quality assurance plan for NIF Projects as required by the LLNL Institutional Software Quality Assurance Program (ISQAP). Planned QA activities help achieve, assess, and maintain appropriate quality of software developed and/or acquired for control systems, shot data systems, laser performance modeling systems, business applications, industrial control and safety systems, and information technology systems. The objective of this SQAP is to ensure that appropriate controls are developed and implemented for management planning, work execution, and quality assessment of the CIS organization's software activities. The CIS line organization places special QA emphasis on rigorous configuration control, change management, testing, and issue tracking to help achieve its quality goals.

Fishler, B

2011-03-18T23:59:59.000Z

330

Mixed Waste Integrated Program Quality Assurance requirements plan  

SciTech Connect

Mixed Waste Integrated Program (MWIP) is sponsored by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Technology Development, Waste Management Division. The strategic objectives of MWIP are defined in the Mixed Waste Integrated Program Strategic Plan, and expanded upon in the MWIP Program Management Plan. This MWIP Quality Assurance Requirement Plan (QARP) applies to mixed waste treatment technologies involving both hazardous and radioactive constituents. As a DOE organization, MWIP is required to develop, implement, and maintain a written Quality Assurance Program in accordance with DOE Order 4700.1 Project Management System, DOE Order 5700.6C, Quality Assurance, DOE Order 5820.2A Radioactive Waste Management, ASME NQA-1 Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Facilities and ANSI/ASQC E4-19xx Specifications and Guidelines for Quality Systems for Environmental Data Collection and Environmental Technology Programs. The purpose of the MWIP QA program is to establish controls which address the requirements in 5700.6C, with the intent to minimize risks and potential environmental impacts; and to maximize environmental protection, health, safety, reliability, and performance in all program activities. QA program controls are established to assure that each participating organization conducts its activities in a manner consistent with risks posed by those activities.

1994-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

331

Energy Assurance Daily | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Assurance Daily Energy Assurance Daily Energy Assurance Daily Energy Assurance Daily provides a summary of public information concerning current energy issues. Published Monday through Friday to inform stakeholders of developments affecting energy systems, flows, and markets, it provides highlights of energy issues rather than a comprehensive coverage. Energy Assurance Daily covers: Major energy developments Electricity, petroleum, and natural gas industries Other relevant news Energy prices The Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration (ISER) Division cannot guarantee the accuracy of the material in the Energy Assurance Daily. Any further use is subject to the copyright restrictions of the source document. The Energy Assurance Daily has workable hypertext links to the

332

Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations, January 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 2

333

2005 Elec. Safety-rev1.pmd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Electrical Safety During Excavations and Penetrations Independent Oversight Lessons Learned Report Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance U. S. Department of Energy SSA Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 1 2.0 RESULTS ......................................................................................... 3 3.0 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................. 7 4.0 OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT ................................... 9 Abbreviations Used in This Report CFR Code of Federal Regulations DOE U.S. Department of Energy EM Office of Environmental Management

334

Safety and Technical Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety and Technical Services Safety and Technical Services Minimize The Safety and Technical Services (STS) organization is a component of the Office of Science's (SC's) Oak Ridge Integrated Support Center. The mission of STS is to provide excellent environmental, safety, health, quality, and engineering support to SC laboratories and other U.S. Department of Energy program offices. STS maintains a full range of technically qualified Subject Matter Experts, all of whom are associated with the Technical Qualifications Program. Examples of the services that we provide include: Integrated Safety Management Quality Assurance Planning and Metrics Document Review Tracking and trending analysis and reporting Assessments, Reviews, Surveillances and Inspections Safety Basis Support SharePoint/Dashboard Development for Safety Programs

335

Catalogue of OSD and HID Offshore Research by Key Human Factor Elements 2002 Revision. Prepared by AEA Technology Environment for the Health and Safety Executive  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The catalogue of OSD and HID Offshore human factors research was conceived by HSE OSD OD6 as an aid to OSD Inspectors and the offshore Industry. It was originally published in 1999 under Project 3696. This catalogue has now been updated by AEA Technology Environment. OSD Offshore has been renamed HID Offshore and hence the catalogue contains both OSD and HID Offshore human factors research, although the majority of the projects included date from the HSE Offshore Safety Division era. The catalogue provides: description of the human factor elements as derived by AEA Technology from the Revision

Angela Crosbie; Fiona Davies

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

336

Quality Assurance Plan for site electrical replacements at substation line item subproject: 69 KV Substation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The 69 KV Substation Project is based on the recognized need to provide a continuous, reliable source of power and to improve the firm capacity of the electrical service to all production facilities at Mound. The project consists of the following major element: 69 KV Substation: (1) Install a 69 KV Substation and associated equipment with two parallel 18 MVA transformers. (2) Install duct bank as required and provide 15 KV feeder cable from new substation to existing Substation 95 for connection to Mound`s existing primary distribution system. (3) Install duct bank for underground routing of the 15 KV feeder cable from Manhole 5C to the existing power house cable pit. (4) Reconfigure existing Dayton Power and Light Co. 15 KV switchgear in P Building. The purpose of this Quality Assurance Plan (QA Plan) is to assure that the objectives of the United States Department of Energy (D.O.E.) and EG&G Mound Applied Technologies, Miamisburg, Ohio (Mound) are met for this non-weapons project relative to health and safety, protection of the environment, reliability and continuity of operations, and documentation of quality efforts. This QA Plan identifies the activities and responsibilities which are necessary in the design, procurement, fabrication, installation, and start up of this project in order to meet these objectives.

Ohler, C.K.

1991-05-21T23:59:59.000Z

337

Environmental Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan  

SciTech Connect

The Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) is intended to document the quality assurance of the Environmental Monitoring Program. The Quality Assurance Project Plan has two parts and is written to become a chapter in the Environmental Monitoring Plan. Part A describes the management responsibilities and activities performed to assure the quality of the Environmental Monitoring Program. Part B covers the documentation requirements for changes in the Monitoring Program, and provides details on control of the design and implementation of quality assurance activities.

Holland, R.C.

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

DOE: Assessment Criteria and Guidelines for Determining the Adequacy of Software Used in the Safety Analysis and Design of Defense Nuclear Facilities, 10j/24/03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document contains software quality assurance (SQA) assessment criteria and guidelines for assessing the safety software currently in use in the safety analysis and design of structures,...

339

Energy Assurance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Assurance Assurance Energy Assurance The Energy Sector consists of thousands of electricity, oil, and natural gas assets that are geographically dispersed and connected by systems and networks. Therefore, interdependency within the sector and across the Nation's critical infrastructure sectors is critical. The energy infrastructure provides fuel to the Nation, and in turn depends on the Nation's transportation, communications, finance, and government infrastructures. The energy systems and networks cross the Nation's borders, making international collaboration a necessary component of the Energy Sector's efforts. Protecting and improving the resiliency of the Energy Sector in the face of both manmade and natural disasters is an ongoing effort that requires continued vigilance, contingency planning, and training. With partnership

340

Weapons Quality Assurance Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5-2008 5-2008 September 2008 DOE STANDARD WEAPON QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD NNSA Weapon Quality Assurance Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1025-2008 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1025-2008 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1025-2008 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................................ vii PURPOSE....................................................................................................................................

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Dam Safety Program (Maryland)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Dam Safety Division within the Department of the Environment is responsible for administering a dam safety program to regulate the construction, operation, and maintenance of dams to prevent...

342

Standard guide for establishing a quality assurance program for uranium conversion facilities  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1.1 This guide provides guidance and recommended practices for establishing a comprehensive quality assurance program for uranium conversion facilities. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate health and safety practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.3 The basic elements of a quality assurance program appear in the following order: FUNCTION SECTION Organization 5 Quality Assurance Program 6 Design Control 7 Instructions, Procedures & Drawings 8 Document Control 9 Procurement 10 Identification and Traceability 11 Processes 12 Inspection 13 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 14 Handling, Storage and Shipping 15 Inspection, Test and Operating Status 16 Control of Nonconforming Items 17 Corrective Actions 18 Quality Assurance Records 19 Audits 20 TABLE 1 NQA-1 Basic Requirements Relat...

American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

343

Quality Assurance Exchange August 2011, Volume 7 Issue 2 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 2011, Volume 7 Issue 2 August 2011, Volume 7 Issue 2 Quality Assurance Exchange August 2011, Volume 7 Issue 2 Quality Assurance Order Revised As part of the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Directives reform initiative, DOE issued a revision to DOE Order (O) 414.1C,Quality Assurance on April 25, 2011. The DOE Quality Council, DOE Departmental Elements, Site Offices, and contractors participated in the review and update ofthe Order. DOE O 414.1D does not impose any new requirements, however, its content was streamlined; existing requirements and responsibilities were clarified; andthe sections were reorganized to reduce redundancy. Quality Assurance Exchange August 2011 Vol 7 Issue 2 More Documents & Publications Quality Assurance Exchange March 2011, Volume 7 Issue 1

344

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Safety Analysis Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The following provides a summary of the specific issues addressed in this FY-95 Annual Update as they relate to the CH TRU safety bases: Executive Summary; Site Characteristics; Principal Design and Safety Criteria; Facility Design and Operation; Hazards and Accident Analysis; Derivation of Technical Safety Requirements; Radiological and Hazardous Material Protection; Institutional Programs; Quality Assurance; and Decontamination and Decommissioning. The System Design Descriptions`` (SDDS) for the WIPP were reviewed and incorporated into Chapter 3, Principal Design and Safety Criteria and Chapter 4, Facility Design and Operation. This provides the most currently available final engineering design information on waste emplacement operations throughout the disposal phase up to the point of permanent closure. Also, the criteria which define the TRU waste to be accepted for disposal at the WIPP facility were summarized in Chapter 3 based on the WAC for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.`` This Safety Analysis Report (SAR) documents the safety analyses that develop and evaluate the adequacy of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Contact-Handled Transuranic Wastes (WIPP CH TRU) safety bases necessary to ensure the safety of workers, the public and the environment from the hazards posed by WIPP waste handling and emplacement operations during the disposal phase and hazards associated with the decommissioning and decontamination phase. The analyses of the hazards associated with the long-term (10,000 year) disposal of TRU and TRU mixed waste, and demonstration of compliance with the requirements of 40 CFR 191, Subpart B and 40 CFR 268.6 will be addressed in detail in the WIPP Final Certification Application scheduled for submittal in October 1996 (40 CFR 191) and the No-Migration Variance Petition (40 CFR 268.6) scheduled for submittal in June 1996. Section 5.4, Long-Term Waste Isolation Assessment summarizes the current status of the assessment.

NONE

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

345

Occupational Safety and Health Program at the West Valley Demonstration Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The West Valley Nuclear Services Co. LLC (WVNS) is committed to provide a safe, clean, working environment for employees, and to implement U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) requirements affecting worker safety. The West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) Occupational Safety and Health Program is designed to protect the safety, health, and well-being of WVDP employees by identifying, evaluating, and controlling biological, chemical, and physical hazards in the work place. Hazards are controlled within the requirements set forth in the reference section at the end of this report. It is the intent of the WVDP Occupational Safety and Health Program to assure that each employee is provided with a safe and healthy work environment. This report shows the logical path toward ensuring employee safety in planning work at the WVDP. In general, planning work to be performed safely includes: combining requirements from specific programs such as occupational safety, industrial hygiene, radiological control, nuclear safety, fire safety, environmental protection, etc.; including WVDP employees in the safety decision-making processes; pre-planning using safety support re-sources; and integrating the safety processes into the work instructions. Safety management principles help to define the path forward for the WVDP Occupational Safety and Health Program. Roles, responsibilities, and authority of personnel stem from these ideals. WVNS and its subcontractors are guided by the following fundamental safety management principles: ''Protection of the environment, workers, and the public is the highest priority. The safety and well-being of our employees, the public, and the environment must never be compromised in the aggressive pursuit of results and accomplishment of work product. A graded approach to environment, safety, and health in design, construction, operation, maintenance, and deactivation is incorporated to ensure the protection of the workers, the public, and the environment.'' These principles are demonstrated through: Conducting all activities in an atmosphere of trust and confidence based on open, honest, and responsive communication. Using innovative and effective approaches to risk identification and management. Applying a systematic approach to planning and execution of all activities that affect the environment, safety, and health through use of the Integrated Environment, Safety, and Health Management System. Holding line management fully accountable to effectively plan and integrate environment, safety, and health activities into field activities. Providing clear policy and direction on environment, safety, and health issues to guide field work. Encouraging and promoting the sharing of environment, safety, and health information and resources. Empowering employees through training, information, tools, and program involvement to effectively protect themselves and the environment. Ensuring it is every employees' responsibility to identify and report potential safety and health hazards and environmental noncompliance. Together, as a team, we accomplish our mission while protecting the environment and preserving the safety and health of each employee and the public.

L. M. Calderon

1999-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

346

DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance "This Department of Energy (DOE or Department) Guide provides information plus acceptable methods for implementing the safety software quality assurance (SQA) requirements of DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, dated 6-17-05. DOE O 414.1C requirements supplement the quality assurance program (QAP) requirements of Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 830, Subpart A, Quality Assurance, for DOE nuclear facilities and activities. The safety SQA requirements for DOE, including the National Nuclear Security

347

Standards Working Groups - Safety and Operating ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

*. Bookmark and Share. Safety and Operating Environment Working Group. Scope: These two areas have been combined ...

2010-12-27T23:59:59.000Z

348

Flow assurance and multiphase pumping  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A robust understanding and planning of production enhancement and flow assurance is required as petroleum E&P activities are targeting deepwaters and long distances. Different flow assurance issues and their solutions are put together in this work. The use of multiphase pumps as a flow assurance solution is emphasized. Multiphase pumping aids flow assurance in different ways. However, the problem causing most concern is sand erosion. This work involved a detection-based sand monitoring method. Our objectives are to investigate the reliability of an acoustic sand detector and analyze the feasibility of gel injection as a method to mitigate sand erosion. Use of a sand detector coupled with twin-screw pumps is studied under varying flow conditions. The feasibility of gel injection to reduce slip and transport produced solids through twin-screw pump is investigated. A unique full-scale laboratory with multiphase pumps was utilized to carry out the experimental tests. The test results indicate that acoustic sand detection works in a narrow window around the calibration signature. An empirical correlation for predicting the twin-screw pump performance with viscous fluids was developed. It shows good agreement in the practical operational limits 50% to 100% speed. The results indicate that viscous gel injection should be an effective erosion mitigation approach as it reduces slip, the principle cause of erosive wear. To correlate the performance of viscous fluid injection to hydroabrasive wear, further experimental investigation is needed.

Nikhar, Hemant G.

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

SHSD Manager Safety Engineering Group Manager  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Safety, Excavation Safety, Scaffold Safety D. Cubillo: Division Database Programmer J. Durnan: Design. Horn (0.5) ORPS Categorizer S. Moss (Emeritus) S. Kane, Group Manager 9/7/10 Environment, Safety

350

State and Local Energy Assurance Planning | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

State and Local Energy Assurance Planning State and Local Energy Assurance Planning OE works closely with State and local governments on energy assurance issues. The office...

351

Coiled Tubing Safety Manual  

SciTech Connect

This document addresses safety concerns regarding the use of coiled tubing as it pertains to the preservation of personnel, environment and the wellbore.

Crow, W.

1999-04-06T23:59:59.000Z

352

Energy Assurance and Interdependency Workshop | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Assurance and Interdependency Workshop Energy Assurance and Interdependency Workshop December 2, 2013 8:00AM EST to December 3, 2013 5:00PM EST Fairmont Hotel in Washington, DC....

353

Life Cycle Asset Management - Quality Assurance -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

17 17 Quality Assurance March 1996 Department of Energy Office of Field Management Office of Project and Fixed Asset Management Contents GPG-FM-017 March 1996 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Graded Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. PRINCIPLES AND PROCESSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1 Goals, Principles and Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1.1 Quality Assurance Goals and Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1.2 Quality Assurance Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 Quality Assurance and Project Phases . . . . .

354

Booz Allen Hamilton Cyber Assurance Testing Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Booz Allen Hamilton Cyber Assurance Testing Laboratory. NVLAP Lab Code: 200423-0. Address and Contact Information: ...

2013-08-16T23:59:59.000Z

355

Proceedings of Workshop on Software Security Assurance ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. NIST Special Publication 500-265 Proceedings of Workshop on Software Security Assurance Tools, Techniques, and Metrics ...

2013-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

356

Technical Standards, Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes - November 2003 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes - November 2003 Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes - November 2003 Technical Standards, Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes - November 2003 November 2003 Software Quality Assurance Plan and Criteria for the Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes Safety analysis software for the DOE "toolbox" was designated by DOE/EH in March 2003 (DOE/EH, 2003). The supporting basis for this designation was provided by a DOE-chartered Safety Analysis Software Group in the technical report, Selection of Computer Codes for DOE Safety Analysis Applications, (August, 2002). Technical Standards, Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes More Documents & Publications DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance Technical Standards, MELCOR - Gap Analysis - May 3, 2004

357

Large hadron collider (LHC) project quality assurance plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The LHC Quality Assurance Plan is a set of operating principles, requirements, and practices used to support Berkeley Lab's participation in the Large Hadron Collider Project. The LHC/QAP is intended to achieve reliable, safe, and quality performance in the LHC project activities. The LHC/QAP is also designed to fulfill the following objectives: (1) The LHC/QAP is Berkeley Lab's QA program document that describes the elements necessary to integrate quality assurance, safety management, and conduct of operations into the Berkeley Lab's portion of the LHC operations. (2) The LHC/QAP provides the framework for Berkeley Lab LHC Project administrators, managers, supervisors, and staff to plan, manage, perform, and assess their Laboratory work. (3) The LHC/QAP is the compliance document that conforms to the requirements of the Laboratory's Work Smart Standards for quality assurance (DOE O 414.1, 10 CFR 830.120), facility operations (DOE O 5480.19), and safety management (DOE P 450.4).

Gullo, Lisa; Karpenko, Victor; Robinson, Kem; Turner, William; Wong, Otis

2002-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

358

CLASSIFICATION OF THE MGR HEALTH SAFETY SYSTEM  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this analysis is to document the Quality Assurance (QA) classification of the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) health safety system structures, systems and components (SSCs) performed by the MGR Safety Assurance Department. This analysis also provides the basis for revision of YMP/90-55Q, Q-List (YMP 1998). The Q-List identifies those MGR SSCs subject to the requirements of DOE/RW-0333P, ''Quality Assurance Requirements and Description'' (QARD) (DOE 1998).

J.A. Ziegler

1999-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

359

Establishing the Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DISTRIBUTIO DISTRIBUTIO FROM: DAE Y. CHUNG DEPUTY ASSISTA@SECRETARY FOR SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS SUBJECT: Establishing the Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board The purpose of this memorandum is to introduce the Office of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance (QA) Corporate Board which implements EM'S policy and guidance and promotes lessons learned and best practices across the sites. The Corporate Board provides the management structure to integrate the independently managed federal and contractor QA Programs into a single corporate entity. The Board serves as a consensus-building body to facilitate institutionalization of a QA Management System across the EM-Complex. The Corporate Board concept originated from the EM Quality Improvement Initiative in

360

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Minute  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(PDF, PPT) Badge Return (LBNL) (PDF, PPT) Counterintelligence (PDF, PPT) Export Control (PDF, PPT) Fraud, Waste and Abuse at LBNL (PDF, PPT) International Researchers & Scholars...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Minute  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Training (PDF, PPT) Job Hazards Analysis (JHA) (PDF, PPT) Job Hazards Analysis (JHA): Updating Your JHA (PDF, PPT) Job Hazards Analysis (JHA): Working Safely (PDF, PPT) Radiation...

362

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Minute  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Authorizations (PDF, PPT) Job Hazards Analysis (JHA) (PDF, PPT) Job Hazards Analysis (JHA): Updating Your JHA (PDF, PPT) Job Hazards Analysis (JHA): Working Safely (PDF, PPT) Work...

363

NREL: Environment, Safety, Health and Quality - Safety  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to NREL. The steps are applied similarly to a job as simple as changing a light bulb or to a complex laboratory activity. Step 1: Define the scope of work Step 2:...

364

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Safety Minute  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidelines - 1 of 2 (PDF, PPT) Computer Monitor Height Guidelines - 2 of 2 (PDF, PPT) Computers: Do You Know Your Keyboard Shortcuts (Windows)? (PDF, PPT) Computers: Take Frequent...

365

Maintaining plant safety margins  

SciTech Connect

The Final Safety Analysis Report Forms the basis of demonstrating that the plant can operate safely and meet all applicable acceptance criteria. In order to assure that this continues through each operating cycle, the safety analysis is reexamined for each reload core. Operating limits are set for each reload core to assure that safety limits and applicable acceptance criteria are not exceeded for postulated events within the design basis. These operating limits form the basis for plant operation, providing barriers on various measurable parameters. The barriers are refereed to as limiting conditions for operation (LCO). The operating limits, being influenced by many factors, can change significantly from cycle to cycle. In order to be successful in demonstrating safe operation for each reload core (with adequate operating margin), it is necessary to continue to focus on ways to maintain/improve existing safety margins. Existing safety margins are a function of the plant type (boiling water reactor/pressurized water reactor (BWR/PWR)), nuclear system supply (NSSS) vendor, operating license date, core design features, plant design features, licensing history, and analytical methods used in the safety analysis. This paper summarizes the experience at Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC) in its efforts to provide adequate operating margin for the plants that it supports.

Bergeron, P.A.

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Quality Assurance Exchange January 2007, Volume 3 Issue 1 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 2007, Volume 3 Issue 1 January 2007, Volume 3 Issue 1 Quality Assurance Exchange January 2007, Volume 3 Issue 1 Quality Assurance Exchange January 2007, Volume 3 Issue 1 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Corporate Safety Analysis DEPARTMENTAL ELEMENTS RESPOND TO "IMPROVING QA" In his memorandum "Improving Quality Assurance," dated April 26, 2006, the Secretary of Energy stated the Department's priority of implementing an effective Quality Assurance program (QAP) and promulgating a quality culture throughout the DOE complex. The Secretary acknowledged the negative impacts on the DOE mission when quality is not applied consistently to Departmental programs. These impacts include rework, delays, and increased program costs in addition to increased risk to workers, public, and the

367

Quality Assurance Exchange April 2009, Volume 5 Issue 1 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 2009, Volume 5 Issue 1 April 2009, Volume 5 Issue 1 Quality Assurance Exchange April 2009, Volume 5 Issue 1 Quality Assurance Exchange April 2009, Volume 5 Issue 1 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Quality Assurance Policy and Assistance IN THE SPOTLIGHT: GEORGE DETSIS, PROGRAM MANAGER Analytical Services Program Office of Corporate Safety Programs The Analytical Services Program (ASP) encompasses approximately 40 annual qualification audits of analytical laboratories and commercial waste operation vendors, semi-annual quality assurance (QA) proficiency testing of 120 domestic and international analytical laboratories, and the development of software and field training to assist the field sites in its systematic planning and environmental sampling programs. In a recent interview, Mr. George Detsis, Department of Energy (DOE) headquarters'

368

QUALITY ASSURANCE EXCHANGE December 2005 Volume 1 Issue 3 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2005 Volume 1 Issue 3 December 2005 Volume 1 Issue 3 QUALITY ASSURANCE EXCHANGE December 2005 Volume 1 Issue 3 QUALITY ASSURANCE EXCHANGE December 2005 Volume 1 Issue 3 U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Corporate Performance Assessment Office of Quality Assurance Programs (EH-31) IN THE SPOTLIGHT: INTERVIEW WITH COLETTE BROUSSARD, QUAL ITY A S SURANCE A DMINISTRATOR, OFFICE OF E NVIRONMENTAL MANAGMENT Colette Broussard has extensive background in DOE as a Quality Assurance Engineer, along with experience in safety engineering and environmental management. Colette joined the DOE in 1983 as a QA Engineer at the Pinellas Plant. She transferred to Headquarters with the Office of Defense Programs in the early 90's and then to the Office of Environmental Management (EM) in 1994 where she has held various environmental restoration and waste

369

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Visit at the LANL CMRR Project Facility Construction Site, November 1-5, 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Visit at the LANL CMRR Project Facility Construction Site, November 1-5, 2010 The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an orientation visit on November 1-5, 2010, at the Chemical and Metallurgy Research Replacement (CMRR) project site at the Department of Energy Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The purpose of the visit was to determine ways in which HSS would be able to carry out its independent oversight responsibilities with respect to this project in a method that encourages integration with DOE-LANL. The orientation visit was conducted by the HSS LANL Site Lead and an HSS contractor.

370

Electrical safety guidelines  

SciTech Connect

The Electrical Safety Guidelines prescribes the DOE safety standards for DOE field offices or facilities involved in the use of electrical energy. It has been prepared to provide a uniform set of electrical safety standards and guidance for DOE installations in order to affect a reduction or elimination of risks associated with the use of electrical energy. The objectives of these guidelines are to enhance electrical safety awareness and mitigate electrical hazards to employees, the public, and the environment.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

DOE handbook electrical safety  

SciTech Connect

Electrical Safety Handbook presents the Department of Energy (DOE) safety standards for DOE field offices or facilities involved in the use of electrical energy. It has been prepared to provide a uniform set of electrical safety guidance and information for DOE installations to effect a reduction or elimination of risks associated with the use of electrical energy. The objectives of this handbook are to enhance electrical safety awareness and mitigate electrical hazards to employees, the public, and the environment.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

UMTRA technical assistance contractor quality assurance program plan  

SciTech Connect

This Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) provides the primary requirements for the integration of quality functions into all Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC) Project organization activities. The QAPP is the written directive authorized by the TAc Program Manager to accomplish this task and to implement procedures that provide the controls and sound management practices needed to ensure TAC contractual obligations are met. The QA program is designed to use monitoring, audit, and surveillance functions as management tools to ensure that all Project organization functions are executed in a manner that will protect public health and safety, promote the success of the Project, and meet or exceed contract requirements.

Not Available

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

Quality Assurance Exchange August 2012, Volume 8 Issue 1 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance Exchange August 2012, Volume 8 Issue 1 Quality Assurance Exchange August 2012, Volume 8 Issue 1 Quality Assurance Exchange August 2012, Volume 8 Issue 1 Interview with Jeff Feit, Technical Standards Program Manager Mr. Jeffrey D. Feit is the Manager for the Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP), Office of Nuclear Safety (HS-30), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). In this position, he is responsible for developing and implementing DOE policy and requirements on matters related to technical standards, including non-Government Voluntary Consensus Standards. Mr. Feit has been with the DOE TSP since its inception over 20 years ago. Among many of his duties,he helped to establish and maintain the Program's infrastructure and process procedures, and has

374

IT Quality Assurance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Quality Quality Assurance IT Quality Assurance Quality, error-free work holds down costs. Avoiding mistakes and rework saves valuable time, effort, and materials. Quality assurance provides the mechanisms for paying close attention to details so that tasks are completed correctly and accurately every step of the way. A quality assurance role should be established for all projects. Software Quality Assurance Plan Example (pdf) An example of a software quality assurance plan developed from an actual DOE project SQA plan based on DOE G 200.1-1A, Software Engineering Methodology. Structured Walkthrough Training and Guidance (pdf) Classroom or individual project team training and materials on how to conduct structured walkthroughs (peer review of products/code). This process guide describes how to conduct a structured walkthrough during the

375

State Energy Assurance Guidelines | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Assurance Guidelines State Energy Assurance Guidelines State Energy Assurance Guidelines The State Energy Assurance Guidelines were developed by the National Association of State Energy Officials (NASEO) with the assistance of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) under the direction of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE). The guidelines integrate the lessons learned from responding to energy emergencies in recent years and from the dialogue that has occurred at conferences, exercises and meetings on energy assurance. They encompass many topics that states may wish to consider incorporating into their plans. Foremost among these is how energy assurance can improve: planning and responding quickly and effectively to

376

Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations, January 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review of the Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 2

377

Ames Laboratory integrated safety management self-assessment report  

SciTech Connect

The implementation of Integrated Safety Management (ISM) at Ames Laboratory began with the signing of the ISM Implementation Charter on February 24, 1997 (see Appendix A). The first step toward implementation of ISM at Ames Laboratory is the performance of a Self-Assessment (SA). In preparation for the SA, a workshop on ISM was provided to the Laboratory`s Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Coordinators, Safety Review Committee members, and the Environment, Safety, Health and Assurance (ESH&A) staff. In addition, a briefing was given to the Laboratory`s Executive Council and Program Directors. Next, an SA Team was organized. The Team was composed of four Ames Laboratory and four Department of Energy-Chicago Operations Office (DOE-CH) staff members. The purpose of this SA was to determine the current status of ES&H management within Ames Laboratory, as well as to identify areas which need to be improved during ISM implementation. The SA was conducted by reviewing documents, interviewing Ames Laboratory management and staff, and performing walkthroughs of Laboratory areas. At the conclusion of this SA, Ames Laboratory management was briefed on the strengths, weaknesses, and the areas of improvement which will assist in the implementation of ISM.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

378

Energy Assurance Daily (EAD): May 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Assurance Daily provides a summary of public information concerning current energy issues. Published Monday through Friday to inform stakeholders of developments affecting energy systems,...

379

Energy Assurance Daily (EAD): July 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Assurance Daily provides a summary of public information concerning current energy issues. Published Monday through Friday to inform stakeholders of developments affecting energy systems,...

380

Energy Assurance Daily (EAD): January - March 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Assurance Daily provides a summary of public information concerning current energy issues. Published Monday through Friday to inform stakeholders of developments affecting energy systems,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Energy Assurance Daily (EAD): April 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Assurance Daily provides a summary of public information concerning current energy issues. Published Monday through Friday to inform stakeholders of developments affecting energy systems,...

382

EM Quality Assurance Assessment Schedule FY 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Attached for planning and coordination purposes is the updated Quality Assurance(QA) assessment schedule for the remainder of fiscal year (FY) 2010.

383

Energy Assurance Daily (EAD): June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Assurance Daily provides a summary of public information concerning current energy issues. Published Monday through Friday to inform stakeholders of developments affecting energy systems,...

384

Office of Quality Assurance - Mission and Functions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Serves as the office of primary interest for QA policies, guidance and other QA directives. Develops and revises QA and software quality assurance (SQA) directives and...

385

FAQS Reference Guide Weapon Quality Assurance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This reference guide addresses the competency statements in the August 2008 edition of DOE-STD-1025-2008, Weapon Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard.

386

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1985 to the DOE Office of the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health. Part 5. Overview and assessment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This volume is progress on work performed for the Office of Nuclear Safety, the Office of Operational Safety, and for the Office of Environmental Analysis for each project. Separate abstracts have been prepared for individual projects. ACR

Faust, L.G.

1986-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

387

OIA: Office of Contract Assurance: Assurance Systems: Issues Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Issues Management Program Issues Management Program Overview The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) Issues Management Program encompasses issue identification, causal analysis, corrective action development, tracking and implementation, and corrective action verification of completion and validation of effectiveness. The program also includes monitoring and analysis of adverse trends and conditions, and sharing of lessons learned and best practices. The issues that are relevant to this program pertain to any safety or operational event, condition, or circumstance that: results or could result in injury, damage, loss, or noncompliance (Example: actual or near miss incidents); represents a program, safety or operational deficiency (Example: audit or assessment finding, performance weakness); or

388

Integrated Safety Management (ISM)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Integrated Safety Management Integrated Safety Management Home ISM Policy ISM Champions ISM Workshops Resources Archives Contact Us Health and Safety HSS Logo Integrated Safety Management (ISM) ism logo Welcome to the Department of Energy's Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Web Site. The Department and its contractors remain firmly committed to ISM as first defined in 1996. The objective of ISM is to perform work in a safe and environmentally sound manner. More specifically, as described in DOE P 450.4, Safety Management System Policy: "The Department and Contractors must systematically integrate safety into management and work practices at all levels so that missions are accomplished while protecting the public, the worker, and the environment. This is to be accomplished through effective integration of safety management into all facets of work planning and execution." "

389

Criticality Safety  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Left Tab EVENTS Office of Nuclear Safety (HS-30) Office of Nuclear Safety Home Directives Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy Rules Nuclear Safety Workshops Technical...

390

Quality Assurance of Computational Model  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Computational of Computational Models Presented at the Annual Department of Presented at the Annual Department of Energy Quality Council Meeting Subir K. Sen Sub . Se Office of Quality Assurance, HS-33 December 7, 2011 Outline Outline * Introduction Introduction * GAO Report 11-143 i l h C il * National Research Council Focus * DOE Model Validation/Performance * Summary 2 Introduction Introduction * Computer models are used in EM's massive Computer models are used in EM s massive clean up effort to model physical and biogeochemical processes biogeochemical processes. * Results from these computational models are often used to make costly cleanup decisions often used to make costly cleanup decisions including selection, performance assessment and annual

391

Quality Assurance Exchange, April 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 , I s s u e 1 M a r c h / A p r i l 2 0 0 9 I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : In the Spotlight: George Detsis, Program Manager, ASP 1 Special Feature: Blurred Vision: Do Our Business Leaders See What Quality is All About? 3 SQA Work Activity: Problem Reporting and Corrective Action 7 HSS QA Activity Corner 8 Quality Council 9 QA-Related Meetings & Conferences 10 Director's Note 10 Lessons Learned: Insufficient Training Causes Near Miss Events and Injuries 5 Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E E X C H A N G E The Analytical Services Program (ASP) encompasses approximately 40 annual qualification audits of analytical laboratories and commercial waste operation vendors, semi-annual quality assurance (QA) proficiency testing of 120 domestic and international analytical laboratories, and the

392

National Policy Assurances - July 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2005) July 2005) To the extent that a term does not apply to a particular type of activity or award, it is self-deleting. Nondiscrimination By signing this agreement or accepting funds under this agreement, the recipient assures that it will comply with applicable provisions of the following, national policies prohibiting discrimination: a. On the basis of race, color, or national origin, in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d, et seq.), as implemented by DOE regulations at 10 CFR part 1040. b. On the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, in Executive Order 11246 [3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339], as implemented by Department of Labor regulations at 41 CFR part 60. c. On the basis of sex or blindness, in Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681, et seq.), as implemented

393

Safety Basis Requirements for Nonnuclear Facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site-Specific Work Smart Standard Revision 3 December 2006  

SciTech Connect

This standard establishes requirements that, when coupled with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) methods and other Work Smart Standards for assuring worker safety, assure that the impacts of nonnuclear operations authorized in LLNL facilities are well understood and controlled in a manner that protects the health of workers, the public, and the environment. All LLNL facilities shall be classified based on potential for adverse impact of operations to the health of co-located (i.e., nearby) workers and the public in accordance with this standard, Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 830, Subpart B, and Department of Energy Order (DOE O) 420.2A.

Beach, D; Brereton, S; Failor, R; Hildum, J; Ingram, C; Spagnolo, S; van Warmerdam, C

2007-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

394

Quality assurance manual: Volume 2, Appendices  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper contains quality assurance information on departments of the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Particular quality assurance policies and standards discussed are on: Mechanical Systems; Klystron and Microwave Department; Electronics Department; Plant Engineering; Accelerator Department; Purchasing; and Experimental Facilities Department. (LSP)

Oijala, J.E.

1988-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

395

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Berkeley Lab Recycling Guide Berkeley Lab Recycling Guide The Berkeley Lab supports the philosophy that prevention is superior to remediation. The goal of waste minimization is to incorporate pollution prevention into the decision-making process at every level throughout the Lab. Additionally, where waste generation is unavoidable, the preference is to reuse or recycle. Reduce Source reduction is to garbage what preventive medicine is to health: a means of eliminating a problem before it can happen. Reduce the amount of paper you use. Use electronic transfer of information. Reduce disposal costs: By decreasing office waste you can dramatically lower the costs of garbage pick-up service. Reduce pollution: The manufacturing of new paper products from recycled materials results in a 74 percent reduction in air pollution and

396

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

M A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Massage Master Emergency Plan Medical - Health Services at the Lab Memorandum of Understanding - UCBLBNL Moving Hazardous...

397

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

E A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z EHS Databases EHS Photo Management System EHS Standards Set for LBNL EHS Training Electrical Equipment Inspection Electrical...

398

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EHS A-Z Index A A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Accident Statistics Accident Statistics Archive Acronyms AccidentIncident Reporting Activity Hazard Document...

399

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Health Services HS Home Clinical Services Policies and Procedures Forms Contact Us EH&S Training images Building 26 (510) 486-6266 Mon-Fri, 7:30 am - 3:30 pm In case of Emergency:...

400

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

J A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z JHA - Job Hazards Analysis JHA (Subcontractor)...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

V A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Vendor Ventilation Database Visitor: Request Gate Pass and Visitor Request Form...

402

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

H A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Hazardous Materials Business Plan Hazardous Materials Transportation & Shipping Hazardous Waste Requisition Hazardous Waste...

403

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

A-Z Index B A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Badging Battery Disposal Beryllium Web Course Biosafety Authorization System Biosafety Manual (LBNL-3435E) Building...

404

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

W A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Waste (E-Waste) Waste (Hazardous Waste) Waste Management Waste (Mixed Waste) Waste (Radioactive Waste) Website Map Who To Call...

405

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

T A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Telemetry Training - EHS Transporting & Shipping Hazardous Materials...

406

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

G A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z GERT - General Employee Radiological Training (EHS0470)...

407

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

storage tanks with environmentally safe double walled tanks, the renovation of many cooling towers, the reengineering of the main photographic shop to fully electronic...

408

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1984 to the DOE Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Safety, and Environment. Part 5. Overview and assessment  

SciTech Connect

Research conducted in 1984 is briefly described. Research areas include: (1) uncertainties in modeling source/receptor relations for acidic deposition; (2) health physics support and assistance to the DOE; (3) technical guidelines for radiological calibrations; (4) personnel neutron dosemeter evaluation and upgrade program; (5) beta measurement evaluation and upgrade; (6) accreditation program for occupational exposure measurements; (7) assurance program for Remedial Action; (8) environmental protection support and assistance; (9) hazardus waste risk assessment; and (10) radiation policy studies. (ACR)

Bair, W.J.

1985-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

409

National Policy Assurances to be Incorporated as Award Terms | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Policy Assurances to be Incorporated as Award Terms National Policy Assurances to be Incorporated as Award Terms National Policy Assurances to be Incorporated as Award Terms The following are the National Policy Assurances which are incorporated by reference as Award Terms at time of Award. The National Policy Assurances which apply to the award are those in effect on the date of award. For example, the August 2008 version applies to all awards from August 2008 through the present. National_Policy_Assurances-September_ 2011.pdf National Policy Assurances - August 2008 National Policy Assurances - September 2007 National Policy Assurances - May 2006 National Policy Assurances - July 2005 National Policy Assurances - October 2004 More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - NationalPolicyAssurances5-06.doc

410

The Office of Health, Safety and Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Home Sub Offices Security Evaluations Cyber Security Evaluations Emergency Management Oversight Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations...

411

Quality Assurance Exchange, September 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 5 I N T H E S P O T L I G H T : I N T E R V I E W W I T H C H I P L A G D O N A C T I N G C H I E F O F N U C L E A R S A F E T Y E N E R G Y , S C I E N C E A N D E N V I R O N M E N T I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : In the Spotlight: Interview with Chip Lagdon, acting CENS 1 Lessons Learned from SQA Assessments 2 SQA Work Activity 1-Software Project Manage- ment & Quality Planning & ASME NQA-1-2000 3 Announcements, Updates, and Activities 7 DOE Order 414.1C Rollout 1 Upcoming Meetings &Workshops 8 S/CI Items Video Conference 6 Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E E X C H A N G E DOE ORDER 414.1C ROLLOUT The Quality Assurance Order Rollout Video Conferences were held July 25 th and August 4 th , 2005, at the DOE For- restal Building, Washington, D.C. Over 20 DOE sites nationwide participated in the video conferences. The primary

412

About Fermilab - Safety  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety and the Environment at Fermilab Safety at Fermilab There is no higher priority at Fermilab than carrying out our scientific mission safely-for employees, users, contractors and visitors on our site. Fermilab Profiles in Safety Fermilab employees continually work to make the lab a safer place to work. Fermilab Profiles in Safety highlight just a few of the employees who have contributed improvements. Our Environment and Our Neighbors For more than 30 years, the Department of Energy's Fermilab has earned international recognition for world-class research in high-energy physics. At the same time, Fermilab has also taken special care in the role of good steward of the land and guardian of the environment for the safety and enjoyment of our employees, visitors and the public. In a time of rapid suburban development, the 6,800 acres of land at Fermilab have become an increasingly valuable environmental community asset for environmental research, recreation and the enjoyment of nature.

413

Nuclear Safety Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

[6450-01-P] [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 830 Nuclear Safety Management AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Final Rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing a final rule regarding Nuclear Safety Management. This Part establishes requirements for the safe management of DOE contractor and subcontractor work at the Department's nuclear facilities. Today's rule adopts the sections that will make up the generally applicable provisions for Part 830. It also adopts the specific section on provisions for developing and implementing a formalized quality assurance program. EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation becomes effective [insert 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Hawkins, U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Safety

414

Safety for Users  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety for Users Safety for Users Safety for Users Print Safety at the ALS The mission of the ALS is "Support users in doing outstanding science in a safe environment." All users and staff participate in creating a culture and environment where performing research using the proper safeguards and fulfilling all safety requirements result in the success of the facility and its scientific program. The documents and guidance below will assist users and staff to achieve these goals. How Do I...? A series of fact sheets that explain what users need to know and do when preparing to conduct experiments at the ALS. Complete Experiment Safety Documentation? Work with Biological Materials? Work with Chemicals? Work with Regulated Soil? Bring and Use Electrical Equipment at the ALS?

415

State Energy Program Assurances - New Hampshire Governor Lynch...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New Hampshire Governor Lynch State Energy Program Assurances - New Hampshire Governor Lynch Letter from New Hampshire Governor Lynch providing Secretary Chu with the assurances...

416

State Energy Program Assurances - Arizona Governor Brewer | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Arizona Governor Brewer State Energy Program Assurances - Arizona Governor Brewer Letter from Arizona Governor Brewer providing Secretary Chu with the assurances needed so that...

417

State Energy Program Assurances - South Carolina Governor Sanford...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - South Carolina Governor Sanford State Energy Program Assurances - South Carolina Governor Sanford Letter from South Carolina Governor Sanford...

418

State Energy Program Assurances - West Virginia Governor Manchin...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - West Virginia Governor Manchin State Energy Program Assurances - West Virginia Governor Manchin Letter from West Virginia Governor Manchin...

419

State Energy Program Assurances - Maine Governor Baldacci | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Maine Governor Baldacci State Energy Program Assurances - Maine Governor Baldacci Letter from Maine Governor Baldacci Rounds providing Secretary...

420

Microsoft Word - National Policy AssurancesAwardTermsREVJuly2005...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Word - National Policy AssurancesAwardTermsREVJuly2005.doc Microsoft Word - National Policy AssurancesAwardTermsREVJuly2005.doc More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word -...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

State Energy Program Assurances - Utah Governor Huntsman | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utah Governor Huntsman State Energy Program Assurances - Utah Governor Huntsman Letter from Utah Governor Huntsman providing Secretary Chu with the assurances needed so that...

422

Cyberspace Policy Review: Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy Review: Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information and Communications Infrastructure Cyberspace Policy Review: Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information and...

423

Establishing the Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Establishing the Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board Establishing the Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board The...

424

NMMSS Software Quality Assurance Plan | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance Plan The Software Quality Assurance Plan (SQAP) for the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguard System (NMMSS) software upgrade project (an actual DOE...

425

State Energy Program Assurances - Texas Governor Perry | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Texas Governor Perry State Energy Program Assurances - Texas Governor Perry Letter from Texas Governor Perry providing Secretary Chu with the...

426

State Energy Program Assurances - Illinois Governor Quinn | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Illinois Governor Quinn State Energy Program Assurances - Illinois Governor Quinn Letter from Rhode Island Governor Carcieri providing Secretary Chu with the assurances needed so...

427

State Energy Program Assurances - South Dakota Governor Rounds...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Administration Other Agencies You are here Home State Energy Program Assurances - South Dakota Governor Rounds State Energy Program Assurances - South Dakota Governor...

428

SAPHIRE 8 Software Quality Assurance Oversight  

SciTech Connect

The software quality assurance oversight consists of updating and maintaining revision control of the SAPHIRE 8 quality assurance program documentation and of monitoring revision control of the SAPHIRE 8 source code. This report summarizes the oversight efforts through description of the revision control system (RCS) setup, operation and contents. Documents maintained under revision control include the Acceptance Test Plan (ATP), Configuration Management Plan, Quality Assurance Plan, Software Project Plan, Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM), System Test Plan, SDP Interface Training Manual, and the SAPHIRE 8, 'New Features and Capabilities Overview'.

Kurt G. Vedros

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

2. Electrical safety  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Correct use of medical equipment within the clinical environment is of prime importance. This includes awareness of the safety issues regarding equipment, particular when it is an electrically powered device. Incidents can occur in the clinic in which ...

Jacques Jossinet

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

430

Safety harness  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A safety harness to be worn by a worker, especially a worker wearing a plastic suit thereunder for protection in a radioactive or chemically hostile environment, which safety harness comprises a torso surrounding portion with at least one horizontal strap for adjustably securing the harness about the torso, two vertical shoulder straps with rings just forward of the of the peak of the shoulders for attaching a life-line and a pair of adjustable leg supporting straps releasibly attachable to the torso surrounding portion. In the event of a fall, the weight of the worker, when his fall is broken and he is suspended from the rings with his body angled slightly back and chest up, will be borne by the portion of the leg straps behind his buttocks rather than between his legs. Furthermore, the supporting straps do not restrict the air supplied through hoses into his suit when so suspended.

Gunter, Larry W. (615 Sand Pit Rd., Leesville, SC 29070)

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

431

Safety harness  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A safety harness to be worn by a worker, especially a worker wearing a plastic suit thereunder for protection in a radioactive or chemically hostile environment. The safety harness comprises a torso surrounding portion with at least one horizontal strap for adjustably securing the harness about the torso, two vertical shoulder straps with rings just forward of the of the peak of the shoulders for attaching a life-line and a pair of adjustable leg supporting straps releasibly attachable to the torso surrounding portion. In the event of a fall, the weight of the worker, when his fall is broken and he is suspended from the rings with his body angled slightly back and chest up, will be borne by the portion of the leg straps behind his buttocks rather than between his legs. Furthermore, the supporting straps do not restrict the air supplied through hoses into his suit when so suspended.

Gunter, L.W.

1991-04-08T23:59:59.000Z

432

Quality Assurance Program Plan | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance Program Plan Quality Assurance Program Plan Quality Assurance Program Plan The achievement of quality in LM activities and products requires implementation of a formal Quality Assurance (QA) Program. This program establishes principles, requirements, practices, and methods for integrating quality into the daily operations of our programs and projects. The QA Program functions as a management tool to ensure that quality objectives are achieved throughout LM's technical, administrative, and operational functions. Achieving quality is the responsibility of managers as well as those who perform the work. Each employee is expected to do the job in accordance with procedures and other requirements. The name LM must represent quality to us, our customers, our service providers, and our

433

Assured Reconfiguration of Fail-Stop Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Hardware dependability improvements have led to a situation in which it is sometimes unnecessary to employ extensive hardware replication to mask hardware faults. Expanding upon our previous work on assured reconfiguration for single processes and building ...

Elisabeth A. Strunk; John C. Knight; M. Anthony Aiello

2005-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

Quality Assurance Procedures for Mesoscale Meteorological Data  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Mesoscale meteorological data present their own challenges and advantages during the quality assurance (QA) process because of their variability in both space and time. To ensure data quality, it is important to perform quality control at many ...

Christopher A. Fiebrich; Cynthia R. Morgan; Alexandria G. McCombs; Peter K. Hall Jr.; Renee A. McPherson

2010-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

Quality Assurance Procedures in the Oklahoma Mesonetwork  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

High quality data sources are critical to scientists, engineers, and decision makers alike. The models that scientists develop and test with quality-assured data eventually become used by a wider community, from policy makers long-term ...

Mark A. Shafer; Christopher A. Fiebrich; Derek S. Arndt; Sherman E. Fredrickson; Timothy W. Hughes

2000-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

436

Office of Quality Assurance: Newsletters and Bulletins  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Quality Assurance Newsletters and Bulletins Quality Assurance Newsletters and Bulletins The Quality Assurance Exchange is a forum for the exchange of ideas and the sharing of experience related to QA issues among DOE field offices, contractors, and DOE headquarters. Readers are strongly encouraged to contribute articles on the implementation of QA requirements, on lessons learned and to offer suggestions. Please forward your input to duli.agarwal@hq.doe.gov. If your contact information has changed or if you would like to receive the QA Exchange Newsletter, forward the following information to qaexchange@hq.doe.gov. Name Phone Number E-mail address Federal or Contractor personnel DOE Organization or company name and site name, if applicable Quality Assurance Exchange August 2012, Volume 8 Issue 1

437

Quality assurance | Princeton Plasma Physics Lab  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Quality assurance Quality assurance Subscribe to RSS - Quality assurance Quality: the characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs. Quality Assurance: the planned and systematic activities implemented to provide confidence that a product or service will fulfill its requirements for quality. PPPL teams up with USDA to produce new egg pasteurization method Researchers at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have developed a novel technique and device for rapidly pasteurizing eggs in the shell without damaging the delicate egg white. The process could lead to a sharp reduction in illnesses caused by egg-borne salmonella bacteria, a widespread public health concern.

438

The ARRA EAP Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

JULY 9, 2012 THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT VOLUME 3, NUMBER 3 JULY 9, 2012 THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT VOLUME 3, NUMBER 3 Need to Know DOE/OE National Energy Assurance Conference Action Items Final Energy Assurance Plans and Reporting Deadlines News from the States California Approves Energy Efficiency Standards Energy Assurance Success Stories Heber Light & Power Takes Lead on Local EA Planning Upcoming Events NASEO/NARUC Environmental Protection & Clean, Reliable Energy Conference "Camp NARUC" GFIRST 2012 Conference Energy Utility Basics Course Guidance from PTI Know the Primary Contacts and Related Partners Alice Lippert, EAP Program Manager Alice.Lippert@hq.doe.gov DOE/OE Website http://www.oe.energy.gov Welcome to the eleventh issue of the quarterly Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin, a service

439

A quality assurance program for software maintenance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper presents the description of a quality assurance (QA) program applied to software maintenance projects. The QA program is a set of checks or inspections overlaid on the steps of the maintenance project. The relationship between the QA program ...

John W. Center

1982-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

Quality Assurance for Critical Decision Reviews RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The purpose of this Quality Assurance for Capital Project Critical Decision Review Module (QARM) is to identify, integrate, and clarify the QA performance objectives, criteria, and guidance needed...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Financial Policy and Assurance .:. Lawrence Berkeley National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& Assurance Financial Policy & Training Home OCFO Home Berkeley Lab Home US Department of Energy Home Quicklinks: A-Z Index for the OCFO Berkeley Lab Home Contact Us: By Group...

442

WEAPONS QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Weapon Weapon Quality Assurance Qualification Standard Reference Guide AUGUST 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

443

Robust Automated Quality Assurance of Radiosonde Temperatures  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper presents a description of the fully automated quality-assurance (QA) procedures that are being applied to temperatures in the Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive (IGRA). Because these data are routinely used for monitoring variations ...

Imke Durre; Russell S. Vose; David B. Wuertz

2008-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

Strategies for Evaluating Quality Assurance Procedures  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The evaluation strategies outlined in this paper constitute a set of tools beneficial to the development and documentation of robust automated quality assurance (QA) procedures. Traditionally, thresholds for the QA of climate data have been based ...

Imke Durre; Matthew J. Menne; Russell S. Vose

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

Idaho National Laboratory Integrated Safety Management System FY 2012 Effectiveness Review and Declaration Report  

SciTech Connect

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) performed an Annual Effectiveness Review of the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), per 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 970.5223 1, Integration of Environment, Safety and Health into Work Planning and Execution. The annual review assessed Integrated Safety Management (ISM) effectiveness, provided feedback to maintain system integrity, and identified target areas for focused improvements and assessments for fiscal year (FY) 2013. Results of the FY 2012 annual effectiveness review demonstrated that the INLs ISMS program was significantly strengthened. Actions implemented by the INL demonstrate that the overall Integrated Safety Management System is sound and ensures safe and successful performance of work while protecting workers, the public, and environment. This report also provides several opportunities for improvement that will help further strengthen the ISM Program and the pursuit of safety excellence. Demonstrated leadership and commitment, continued surveillance, and dedicated resources have been instrumental in maturing a sound ISMS program. Based upon interviews with personnel, reviews of assurance activities, and analysis of ISMS process implementation, this effectiveness review concludes that ISM is institutionalized and is Effective.

Farren Hunt

2012-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

446

QualityAssurance&Testing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Testing and Testing Manufacturing Technologies The Manufacturing Science & Technology Center provides customers with manufacturing quality requirements, testing standards and specifica- tions for new product designs, including the implementation of these requirements into final product acceptance complete with documenta- tion. Technical support and procedures are fur- nished for Interagency Product Acceptance. Capabilities * Will inspect printed circuit (PC) boards, wire wrap boards, boxes, chassis, cables, racks, systems, etc. * Work from sketches or formal drawings * Review drawings and requirements * Visual inspections for layout, markings, solder joints, components, mechanical assembly, general workmanship, safety * Point-to-point continuity checks

447

EM Quality Assurance Centralized Training Platform Project Plan for 2009-2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE EM CENTRALIZED TRAINING PLATFORM PROJECT PLAN Prepared by: Date: Approved by: Date: Revision 0 Page 3 of 30 05/11/09 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Department of Energy (DOE) expertise in quality assurance (QA) has degraded significantly over the last 10 years due to workforce attrition and the lack of emphasis on QA principles. Since the 2007 establishment and subsequent implementation of the Office of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance Improvement Initiative, the need for trained QA specialists and personnel familiar with the role of QA in integrated safety management and project management is becoming critical. As EM Field Offices struggle to identify sufficient resources to properly implement the EM Quality

448

Quality assurance program for isotopic power systems  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the Sandia National Laboratories Quality Assurance Program that applies to non-weapon (reimbursable) Radioisotopic Thermoelectric Generators. The program has been implemented over the past 16 years on power supplies used in various space and terrestrial systems. The quality assurance (QA) activity of the program is in support of the Department of Energy, Office of Space Nuclear Projects. Basic elements of the program are described in the report and examples of program decumentation are presented.

Hannigan, R.L.; Harnar, R.R.

1982-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

449

Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Implementation Study  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Many power producers are required to include a Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Plan in their first Title V permit renewal application. In developing the CAM plan, sources must provide a reasonable assurance of compliance with the applicable emission limit(s) for each affected unit. Currently, only particulate mass emissions are of concern to power producers. Therefore, CAM plans must be based on measurable parameters that can be related to particulate emissions in a reliable manner. Since the regul...

2003-10-16T23:59:59.000Z

450

Safety Management System Policy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

POLICY POLICY Washington, D.C. Approved: 4-25-11 SUBJECT: INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT POLICY PURPOSE AND SCOPE To establish the Department of Energy's (DOE) expectation for safety, 1 including integrated safety management that will enable the Department's mission goals to be accomplished efficiently while ensuring safe operations at all departmental facilities and activities. This Policy cancels and supersedes DOE Policy (P) 411.1, Safety Management Functions, Responsibilities, and Authorities Policy, dated 1-28-97; DOE P 441.1, DOE Radiological Health and Safety Policy, dated 4-26-96; DOE P 450.2A, Identifying, Implementing and Complying with Environment, Safety and Health Requirements, dated 5-15-96; DOE P 450.4, Safety Management

451

Surveillance Guide - MAS 10.1 Implementation of the Integrated Safety Management System Process in Maintenance Activities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementation of the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Process in Implementation of the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Process in Maintenance Activities 1.0 Objective The objective of this surveillance is to evaluate the effectiveness of the contractor's ISMS process with regard to maintenance activities. Surveillance activities encompass work planning and control, equipment status control, performance of maintenance, return to service, and closeout documentation. 2.0 References 2.1 DOE 4330.4B Maintenance Management Program 2.2 DOE 5480.19 Conduct of Operations for DOE Facilities 2.3 48 CFR 970.5204-2 Implementation of Environment, Safety, and Health into Work Planning and Execution 2.4 10 CFR 830.120 Quality Assurance 3.0 Requirements Implemented This surveillance is conducted to implement requirements of the

452

International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor U.S. Home Team Quality Assurance Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) project is unique in that the work is divided among an international Joint Central Team and four Home Teams, with the overall responsibility for the quality of activities performed during the project residing with the ITER Director. The ultimate responsibility for the adequacy of work performed on tasks assigned to the U.S. Home Team resides with the U.S. Home Team Leader and the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fusion Energy (DOE-OFE). This document constitutes the quality assurance plan for the ITER U.S. Home Team. This plan describes the controls exercised by U.S. Home Team management and the Performing Institutions to ensure the quality of tasks performed and the data developed for the Engineering Design Activities assigned to the U.S. Home Team and, in particular, the Research and Development Large Projects (7). This plan addresses the DOE quality assurance requirements of 10 CFR 830.120, "Quality Assurance." The plan also describes U.S. Home Team quality commitments to the ITER Quality Assurance Program. The ITER Quality Assurance Program is based on the principles described in the International Atomic Energy Agency Standard No. 50-C-QA, "Quality Assurance for Safety in Nuclear Power Plants and Other Nuclear Facilities." Each commitment is supported with preferred implementation methodology that will be used in evaluating the task quality plans to be submitted by the Performing Institutions. The implementing provisions of the program are based on guidance provided in American National Standards Institute/American Society of Mechanical Engineers NQA-1 1994, "Quality Assurance." The individual Performing Institutions will implement the appropriate quality program provisions through their own established quality plans that have been reviewed and found to comply with U.S. Home Team quality assurance plan commitments to the ITER Quality Assurance Program. The extent of quality program provisions applied to any specific task is proportional to, and appropriate for, the safety and/or project success significance of the task, as determined by the cognizant Technical Manager and the U.S. Home Team Quality Coordinator. In general, the research and development activities will have only those controls appropriate to ensure the quality of the manufacturing activity and validate the resultant data.

Sowder, W. K.

1998-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Safety and Security What do Safety/Security work with?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Safety and Security on campus #12;Agenda · What do Safety/Security work with? · If something happens · Opening hours · Remember · Website · How to find us #12;The Section for Safety and Security work with; · Security revolving work environment · Handle locks, keys, alarms, surveillance · Responsible

454

The Groundwater Performance Assessment Project Quality Assurance Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document provides the quality assurance guidelines that will be followed by the groundwater project.

Walker, Thomas G.

2005-01-26T23:59:59.000Z

455

Quality Assurance Lessons Learned 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Quality Council Lessons Learned Quality Council Lessons Learned Vendor Supplier Deficiencies: Myers Drum Concerns at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) The Office of Packaging and Transportation, in the DOE Office of Environmental Management, issued a Safety Alert in January 12, 2010, (Issue Number: DOE/OPT/SA-01) alerting the DOE packaging and transportation community about potential failure associated with 55 and 30-gallon carbon steel drum closure rings. On January 13, 2010, HSS issued a Data Collection Sheet (DCS) to all DOE sites citing the concerns as well. Those concerns arose while contractors were performing receipt inspections on several lots of drums and drum rings received at the Hanford site and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). It was determined that the drum

456

Quality Assurance: Underlying Quality Principles  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Underlying Quality Principles Underlying Quality Principles These principles are consistent with Integrated Safety Management Policy, P 450.4A and support ISM implementation. Define Policies and Objectives--Ensure they are Understood and Accepted. Management must set expectations for the organization as a whole before employees can do their jobs, satisfy their customers, and strive to improve the quality of their work. This is accomplished by developing and implementing specific policies and objectives that reflect the operating philosophy of the facility's management. Once these policies and objectives have been established, all managers must take the necessary actions to ensure that each employee shares their vision of the organization's purpose. Specify Roles and Responsibilities--Ensure they are Understood and Accepted.

457

Quality Assurance Exchange April 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 A p r i l 2 0 0 7 I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : EM Initiates QA Evaluation Plan 1 WTS Shares Issues Management Program 1 "How To" Series on Performing Assessments: Preparing to be Audited 2 SQA Work Activity #5 Software Requirements Identification and Management 4 Communication is Key When Auditing Suppliers 5 Safety Software Central Registry Activities 6 Activities, Updates, & Announcements 6 Upcoming Meetings & Conferences 7 Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E E X C H A N G E Identifying and correcting problems at an effective level at a DOE nuclear facility is absolutely essential. Ineffective approaches may lead to unsafe working conditions, high cost, and tarnished performance records. Washington TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) is the managing and operating (M&O) contrac-

458

About Fermilab - Safety  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety and the Environment at Fermilab Safety and the Environment at Fermilab Questions people ask about safety at Fermilab Is it safe to live near Fermilab? Yes. Fermilab's activities produce no harmful effects on the environment or on the people who live nearby. The laboratory poses no radiation hazard to surrounding communities. Fermilab has a comprehensive environmental monitoring program to ensure the health and safety of both the laboratory site and the neighboring community. Can the accelerators "melt down" or blow up? No. In the event of a power interuption or failure of other equipment, each Fermilab accelerator simply switches off, like a light bulb or television set. Accelerators contain no harmful materials: the particle beams just stop. When equipment is fixed and power restored, operators are able to turn back on the accelerators.

459

Microsoft Word - 2011 Pantex Quality Assurance Survey Activity Report _May 2-6, 2011_ final  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PTX-2011-05-06 PTX-2011-05-06 Site: Pantex Plant Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Pantex Site Office Quality Assurance Survey Dates of Activity : 05/02/2011 - 05/06/2011 Report Preparer William Macon Activity Description/Purpose: In coordination with the Pantex Site Office (PXSO), the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) site lead participated in a National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)/PXSO Quality Assurance Survey (QAS 1) of the contractor's weapon quality program conducted May 2-5, 2011. Result: The HSS site lead participated in the QAS 1 as a member of the survey team and was responsible for reviewing the following Department of Energy/NNSA Weapon Quality Policy (QC-1) elements: 2.1 Risk-Based Program, 2.2 Quality

460

Safety | Argonne National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety Safety Biosafety Safety Safety is integral to Argonne's scientific research and engineering technology mission. As a leading U.S. Department of Energy multi-program research laboratory, our obligation to the American people demands that we conduct our research and operations safely and responsibly. As a recognized leader in safety, we are committed to making ethical decisions that provide a safe and healthful workplace and a positive presence within the larger Chicagoland community. Argonne's Integrated Safety Management program is the foundation of the laboratory's ongoing effort to provide a safe and productive environment for employees, users, other site personnel, visitors and the public. Related Sites U.S. Department of Energy Lessons Learned Featured Media

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Joint Working Group for Fusion Safety | Princeton Plasma Physics...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Human Resources Environment, Safety & Health Sustainable PPPL Joint Working Group for Fusion Safety Procurement Division Technology Transfer Furth Plasma Physics Library Contact...

462

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

are anticipated, so this authority is not currently needed. The LSO Integrated Safety Management System Description and Environment, Safety and Health Functions,...

463

Demonstrating Usability and Safety The Role and Use of the ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Page 8. In safety critical environments, ... Page 9. Who else believes in the relationship between usability and safety? ... Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ...

2012-05-23T23:59:59.000Z

464

Review of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Integrated Safety...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Criteria, Review and Approach Document DNFSB Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board DOE U.S. Department of Energy ESH&Q Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality FBP...

465

The ARRA EAP Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2012 THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1 3, 2012 THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1 Need to Know DOE/OE National-Level Energy Assurance Conference Action Items DOE to Request Sharing of State EA Plans Exercise and Reporting Deadlines News from the States Texas Home Weatherization Program is a Success Energy Assurance Success Stories Western Regional Energy Assurance Exercise Recap Other Useful Information and Links Introduction to Energy Infrastructure Interdependencies Cyber Security Concerns for LEAP Planning Upcoming Events NARUC National Electricity Forum NASEO Energy Policy & Technology Outlook Conference Guidance from PTI Know the Local Government Energy Profile Alice Lippert, EAP Program Manager Alice.Lippert@hq.doe.gov OE Website

466

The ARRA EAP Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2012 THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT VOLUME 3, NUMBER 2 2, 2012 THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT VOLUME 3, NUMBER 2 Need to Know DOE/OE National Energy Assurance Conference Action Items DOE Requests Sharing of State EA Plans Exercise and Reporting Deadlines Energy Assurance Success Stories West Virginia News from the States California is Top Renewable State Upcoming Events NMU "The Basics" Courses Smart Grid Customer Education Symposium National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Other Useful Information and Links PTI releases new documents Energy Emergency Assurance Coordinator (EEAC) Training Guidance for Use of Unallocated Grant Funds Alice Lippert, EAP Program Manager Alice.Lippert@hq.doe.gov OE Website http://www.oe.energy.gov

467

Princeton Plasma Physics Lab - Quality assurance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

quality-assurance Quality: the quality-assurance Quality: the characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.Quality Assurance: the planned and systematic activities implemented to provide confidence that a product or service will fulfill its requirements for quality. en PPPL teams up with USDA to produce new egg pasteurization method http://www.pppl.gov/news/press-releases/2013/09/pppl-teams-usda-produce-new-egg-pasteurization-method

Researchers at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have developed a novel technique

468

Highly Integrated Quality Assurance An Empirical Case  

SciTech Connect

Highly Integrated Quality Assurance An Empirical Case Drake Kirkham1, Amy Powell2, Lucas Rich3 1Quality Manager, Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) Program, Idaho National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1625 M/S 6122, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-6122 2Quality Engineer, RPS Program, Idaho National Laboratory 3Quality Engineer, RPS Program, Idaho National Laboratory Contact: Voice: (208) 533-7550 Email: Drake.Kirkham@inl.gov Abstract. The Radioisotope Power Systems Program of the Idaho National Laboratory makes an empirical case for a highly integrated Quality Assurance function pertaining to the preparation, assembly, testing, storage and transportation of 238Pu fueled radioisotope thermoelectric generators. Case data represents multiple campaigns including the Pluto/New Horizons mission, the Mars Science Laboratory mission in progress, and other related projects. Traditional Quality Assurance models would attempt to reduce cost by minimizing the role of dedicated Quality Assurance personnel in favor of either functional tasking or peer-based implementations. Highly integrated Quality Assurance adds value by placing trained quality inspectors on the production floor side-by-side with nuclear facility operators to enhance team dynamics, reduce inspection wait time, and provide for immediate, independent feedback. Value is also added by maintaining dedicated Quality Engineers to provide for rapid identification and resolution of corrective action, enhanced and expedited supply chain interfaces, improved bonded storage capabilities, and technical resources for requirements management including data package development and Certificates of Inspection. A broad examination of cost-benefit indicates highly integrated Quality Assurance can reduce cost through the mitigation of risk and reducing administrative burden thereby allowing engineers to be engineers, nuclear operators to be nuclear operators, and the cross-functional team to operate more efficiently. Applicability of this case extends to any high-value, long-term project where traceability and accountability are determining factors.

Drake Kirkham; Amy Powell; Lucas Rich

2011-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

Surveillance Guides - QAS 2.6 Quality Assurance Records  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 1.0 Objective The objective of this surveillance is to evaluate the effectiveness of the contractor's implementation of the program to identify, collect and maintain quality assurance records. The surveillance encompasses records associated with design, maintenance, and operations. In addition to evaluating the effectiveness of the contractor's implementation, the Facility Representative also evaluates compliance with applicable DOE requirements. 2.0 References 2.1 DOE 5700.6C, Quality Assurance 2.2 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants. 2.3 NQA-1-1989, Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Facilities

470

Software assurance by bounded exhaustive testing  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The contribution of this paper is an experiment that shows the potential value of a combination of selective reverse engineering to formal specifications and bounded exhaustive testing to improve the assurance levels of complex software. A key problem ... Keywords: TestEra, automated test case generation, bounded exhaustive testing, formal methods, reverse engineering, specification-based testing

Kevin Sullivan; Jinlin Yang; David Coppit; Sarfraz Khurshid; Daniel Jackson

2004-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

October 21, 2003, Board Public Meeting Presentations - ESE Safety Oversight Policy, Practices, and Implementation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy, Science and Environment Energy, Science and Environment Before the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Hearing October 21, 2003 Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the Board for inviting me to address you today. I welcome this opportunity to tell you about the progress the Department has made in assuring safe operations while accomplishing its missions. For my part, I am proud of the record to date. First, we need to understand the historical context underlying the actions of this Administration. The DOE of the 80's was in denial of its defense environmental responsibilities, liabilities and risks. This culminated in the FBI raid on Rocky Flats in 1989. The DOE of the 90's acknowledged the responsibilities and liabilities but didn't understand the risks and couldn't develop systems and processes for addressing them.

472

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Orientation Visit to the Nevada National Security Site - January 11-13, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Orientation Visit to the Nevada National Orientation Visit to the Nevada National Security Site - January 11-13, 2011 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an orientation visit to the DOE Nevada Site Office (NSO) and the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) from January 11-13, 2011. The purpose of the visit was to discuss the nuclear safety oversight strategy, initiate the site lead program, increase HSS personnel's operational awareness of the site's activities, and to determine how HSS can carry out its independent oversight and mission support responsibilities. Staff from NSO, National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory provided HSS personnel with detailed

473

ORISE: Safety is our top priority  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety Safety Integrated Safety Management Voluntary Protection Program VPP Star Status Environment Work Smart Standards Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education Safety at ORISE At the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) safety is our number one priority. We not only have a tradition of safety at work, but strongly encourage our employees to carry this mindset beyond the workplace and into their homes and communities. Employees are trained in how to work safely and are required to sign a safety pledge that affirms their commitment to safety. The pledge also obligates them to watch out for each another, challenge and report unsafe working conditions, follow all safety policies and procedures, and never take shortcuts at the expense of safety. For ORISE employees, the word "safety" includes the environment, as

474

Pipeline Safety  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Pipeline Safety. Summary: Our goal is to provide standard test methods and critical data to the pipeline industry to improve safety and reliability. ...

2012-11-13T23:59:59.000Z

475

State of Arkansas-State Energy Program Assurances | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State of Arkansas-State Energy Program Assurances State of Arkansas-State Energy Program Assurances A letter describing the intentions of Arkansas's share of the 3.1 billion...

476

State Energy Program Assurances - Washington D.C. Mayor Fenty...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Washington D.C. Mayor Fenty State Energy Program Assurances - Washington D.C. Mayor Fenty Letter from Washington D.C. Mayor Fenty providing...

477

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Energy Assurance Planning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Energy Assurance The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Energy Assurance Planning (EAP) Bulletin, January 3 2012, Volume 3 No. 1 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Energy Assurance Planning (EAP) Bulletin, January 3 2012, Volume 3 No. 1 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Energy Assurance Planning (EAP) Bulletin provides information on energy assurance planning resources, upcoming events, training opportunities, and important grant deliverable dates. VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1. January 2012 Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin Volume 3 No 1.pdf More Documents & Publications The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Energy Assurance Planning (EAP) Bulletin, July 1 2010, Volume 1 No. 3 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Energy Assurance Planning

478

2012 National Energy Assurance Planning Conference After-Action...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Assurance Planning Conference After-Action Report (August 2012) 2012 National Energy Assurance Planning Conference After-Action Report (August 2012) On June 28-29, 2012, the...

479

July 2012 ARRA Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin Available  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department released the July 2012 issue of the ARRA Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin (EAPB). The ARRA EAPB is issued quarterly to provide information on energy assurance planning resources,...

480

April 2012 ARRA Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin Available | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ARRA Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin Available ARRA Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin Available April 2012 ARRA Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin Available April 2, 2012 - 2:15pm Addthis The Department released the April 2012 issue of the ARRA Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin (EAPB). The ARRA EAPB is issued quarterly to provide information on energy assurance planning resources, upcoming events, training opportunities, and important grant deliverable dates. This is the tenth issue of the EAP Bulletin; previous issues are available for download. Addthis Related Articles January 2012 ARRA Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin Available July 2012 ARRA Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin Available April 2012 ARRA Energy Assurance Planning Bulletin Available LM's New Role for the DOE Title X Reimbursement Program

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assurance environment safety" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory - Safety at SLAC  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety at SLAC PHOTO: Landscape of oak tree and green grass SLAC is committed to protecting the health and safety of our staff, the community and the environment as we carry out...

482

A Basic Guide to EMs Quality Assurance Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Brief booklet discussion of highlights from the EM Corporate Quality Assurance Program (based on Revision 0 of the program).

483

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, SAFETY CULTURE, AND SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT RESEARCH FACILITIES.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Organizational culture surveys of research facilities conducted several years ago and archival occupational injury reports were used to determine whether differences in safety performance are related to general organizational factors or to ''safety culture'' as reflected in specific safety-related dimensions. From among the organizations surveyed, a pair of facilities was chosen that were similar in size and scientific mission while differing on indices of work-related injuries. There were reliable differences in organizational style between the facilities, especially among workers in environment, safety, and health functions; differences between the facilities (and among job categories) on the safety scale were more modest and less regular.

BROWN,W.S.

2000-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

484

DOE Celebrates the 40th Earth Day  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis HS-20 Home Mission & Functions Office of Nuclear Safety, Quality Assurance & Environment ...

485

Quality assurance program plan for radionuclide airborne emissions monitoring  

SciTech Connect

This Quality Assurance Program Plan identifies quality assurance program requirements and addresses the various Westinghouse Hanford Company organizations and their particular responsibilities in regards to sample and data handling of radiological airborne emissions. This Quality Assurance Program Plan is prepared in accordance with and to written requirements.

Boom, R.J.

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY & HEALTH DIVISION 8 July 2011 SLAC-I-730-0A21C-032-R000 1 of 4  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

), Decommissioning Handbook: Procedures and Practices for Decommissioning (DOE/EM-0383). #12;SLAC National of Environmental Management (EM), Decommissioning Handbook: Procedures and Practices for Decommissioning (DOE/EM in a manner that does not endanger personnel or harm the environment. They cover temporary and permanent

Wechsler, Risa H.

487

Focused Safety Management Evaluation of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Oak Ridge National Laboratory Focused Safety Management Evaluation of the Office of Environment, Safety and Health Oversight Environment, Safety and Health Integrated Safety Management ISM OVERSIGHT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................ 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 5 2.0 INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM................................... 9 2.1 Line Management Responsibility for Safety ......................................10 2.2 Clear Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities .................................14 2.3 Competence Commensurate With Responsibilities .........................17

488

Safety and Security Enforcement Process Overview  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SAFETY AND SECURITY SAFETY AND SECURITY ENFORCEMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW August 2012 OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OVERSIGHT OFFICE OF HEALTH, SAFETY AND SECURITY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AUGUST 2012 DOE ENFORCEMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW PREFACE i Preface Over the years, the United States Congress has given the Secretary of Energy authority to promulgate rules to provide assurance that U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) contractors provide a workplace free from recognized hazards, that the operations of our nuclear facilities minimize potential danger to life and property, and that our classified matter is protected from disclosure in the interest of national security. Congress institutionalized these mandates through amendments to the Atomic Energy Act, and Congress also provided DOE with enforcement authority to assure compliance

489

ORISE: Integrated Safety Management (ISM)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) is committed to performing work safely as it operates the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE). ORAU supports the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) policy of using management systems to integrate safety into work practices at all levels. ORAU defines "safety" as encompassing environment, safety and health, and also includes waste minimization and pollution prevention. All ORAU programs and departments actively pursue continuous improvement, and the addition of Integrated Safety Management (ISM) concepts further strengthens safety as a standard in ORISE's culture. ORAU has accepted the ISM concept by contract under DOE Acquisition Regulations Clause 970.5204-2 and DOE Policy 450.4, Safety Management System Policy.

490

U.S. Railroad Safety Statistics and Trends  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Railroad Safety Statistics and Trends Railroad Safety Statistics and Trends Robert E. Fronczak, P.E. Assistant VP- Environment & Hazmat Association of American Railroads Transportation External Coordination Working Group Meeting September 21, 2005 Railroad Safety: Topics Safety Statistics & Trends Train Safety (Train Accidents) Employee Safety Hazardous Materials Safety U.S. Railroad Safety Statistics: Main Themes Railroads have dramatically improved safety over the last two and a half decades. Railroads compare favorably with other industries & transportation modes. The most troubling railroad safety problems arise from factors largely outside railroad control. Railroads have implemented numerous and effective technological improvements and company-wide safety programs.

491

2012 Quality Assurance Improvement Project Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE HQ/EFCOG Project Plan Rev. 0 DOE HQ/EFCOG Project Plan Rev. 0 2 Office of Environmental Management and Energy Facility Contractors Group 2012 Quality Assurance Improvement Project Plan Introduction: This Project Plan is jointly developed by the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) and the Energy Facility Contractors Group (EFCOG), to provide execution support to the EM Quality Assurance (QA) Corporate Board. The Board serves a vital and critical role in ensuring that the EM mission is completed safely, correctly, and efficiently. The joint EM-EFCOG approach to enhancing QA signifies the inherent commitment to partnership and collaboration that is required between the contractor community and DOE to proactively improve performance of the EM mission and projects. This mandate is more

492

Quality Assurance for Critical Decision Reviews RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance for Quality Assurance for Critical Decision Reviews Module March 2010 CD-0 O 0 OFFICE OF Q C CD-1 F ENVIRO Standard R Quality A Rev Critical Decis CD-2 M ONMENTAL Review Plan Assuranc view Module sion (CD) Ap CD March 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) e (QA) e pplicability D-3 EMENT CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-1189-2008,

493

Report: Acquisition, Project Management, and Quality Assurance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition, Project Management, and Quality Assurance Acquisition, Project Management, and Quality Assurance September 30, 2009 Submitted by the EMAB Acquisition and Project Management Subcommittee Background For FY 2009 EMAB was tasked to review the management and delivery of EM's Construction Projects and confirm whether or not the program is headed in the right direction or needs to make some adjustments in order to improve efficiency. EMAB reviewed and discussed the topics of Acquisition and Project Management during its public meetings. The Acquisition and Project Management subcommittee, comprised of Mr. G. Brian Estes, Dr. Lawrence Papay, and Mr. David Swindle, engaged in teleconferences on August 7 and September 4 with EM senior personnel. Findings and Observations