Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

2

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

3

Published Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Published Peer Reviews Published Peer Reviews Published Peer Reviews Peer Review Agenda Vehicle Technologies Annual Merit Review Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 (pdf) Peer Review Plan for influential scientific assessment entitled, "Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1." (pdf) Peer Review Plan for Highly Influential Scientific Assessment entitled, "Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications" (pdf) Peer Review Plan for Highly Influential Scientific Assessment entitled, "Synthesis and Assessment Report on Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario

4

Building Technologies Program: Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program: Peer Review on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Program: Peer Review on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Program: Peer Review on Delicious Rank Building...

5

PEER REVIEW PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect

The Institute for Regulatory Science (RS) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) jointly estab lished a peer-review program. As the program evolved, four types of review were established. A process for stakeholder participation in peer review eetings was also developed. While a committee established by the ASME provided oversight to the peer-review process, the RSI managed the day-to-day operations of peer review panels. In addition to the reports resulting from peer review of specific projects, several documents were prepared to facilitate the review process, all of which were widely distributed.

MOGHISSI, A ALAN; LOVE, BETTY R; STRAJA, SORIN R

2007-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

6

MELCOR Peer Review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code that models the progression of severe accidents in light water reactor nuclear power plants. The newest version of MELCOR is Version 1.8.1, July 1991. MELCOR development has reached the point that the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission sponsored a broad technical review by recognized experts to determine or confirm the technical adequacy of the code for the serious and complex analyses it is expected to perform. For this purpose, an eight-member MELCOR Peer Review Committee was organized. The Committee has completed its review of the MELCOR code: the review process and findings of the MELCOR Peer Review Committee are documented in this report. The Committee has determined that recommendations in five areas are appropriate: (1) MELCOR numerics, (2) models missing from MELCOR Version 1.8.1, (3) existing MELCOR models needing revision, (4) the need for expanded MELCOR assessment, and (5) documentation.

Boyack, B.E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Dhir, V.K. [Santa Monica, CA. (United States); Gieseke, J.A. [Battelle, Columbus, OH (United States); Haste, T.J. [AEA Technology, Winfrith (United Kingdom); Kenton, M.A. [Gabor, Kenton and Associates, Inc., Westmont, IL (United States); Khatib-Rahbar, M. [Energy Research, Inc., Rockville, MD (United States); Leonard, M.T. [Science Applications International Corp., Wolfheze (Netherlands); Viskanta, R. [Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN (United States). Heat Transfer Lab.

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

7

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review - Sept, 2007 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III...

8

CONTAIN independent peer review  

SciTech Connect

The CONTAIN code was developed by Sandia National Laboratories under the sponsorship of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to provide integrated analyses of containment phenomena. It is used to predict nuclear reactor containment loads, radiological source terms, and associated physical phenomena for a range of accident conditions encompassing both design-basis and severe accidents. The code`s targeted applications include support for containment-related experimental programs, light water and advanced light water reactor plant analysis, and analytical support for resolution of specific technical issues such as direct containment heating. The NRC decided that a broad technical review of the code should be performed by technical experts to determine its overall technical adequacy. For this purpose, a six-member CONTAIN Peer Review Committee was organized and a peer review as conducted. While the review was in progress, the NRC issued a draft ``Revised Severe Accident Code Strategy`` that incorporated revised design objectives and targeted applications for the CONTAIN code. The committee continued its effort to develop findings relative to the original NRC statement of design objectives and targeted applications. However, the revised CONTAIN design objectives and targeted applications. However, the revised CONTAIN design objectives and targeted applications were considered by the Committee in assigning priorities to the Committee`s recommendations. The Committee determined some improvements are warranted and provided recommendations in five code-related areas: (1) documentation, (2) user guidance, (3) modeling capability, (4) code assessment, and (5) technical assessment.

Boyack, B.E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Corradini, M.L. [Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States). Nuclear Engineering Dept.; Denning, R.S. [Battelle Memorial Inst., Columbus, OH (United States); Khatib-Rahbar, M. [Energy Research Inc., Rockville, MD (United States); Loyalka, S.K. [Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO (United States); Smith, P.N. [AEA Technology, Dorchester (United Kingdom). Winfrith Technology Center

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

ESS 2012 Peer Review - National Assessment of Energy Storage...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Assessment of Energy Storage for Grid Balancing and Arbitrage October 2, 2012 1 Authors: M. Kintner-Meyer, P. Balducci, W. Colella, M. Elizondo, C. Jin, T. Nguyen, V. Viswanathan,...

10

EMSL: External Peer Reviewers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS Additional Information User Portal 2014 Call for Proposals 2014 Proposal Guidance 2014 Proposal Review Criteria Guidance for Letters of Intent to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call Guidance for Full Proposals to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call (Invited Only) 2014 Proposal Planning 2014 Proposal Summary/Extension Previous Calls External Peer Reviewers Fellowships and Awards Nufo, logo External peer reviewers are valuable contributors to EMSL's user proposals process. They provide objective evaluations of the quality of the proposals according to established review criteria, and participate on Review Panels that calibrate the proposals into a ranked order. EMSL is truly grateful to the researchers who donated their time and efforts in fiscal year 2012 to

11

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Superconducting Flywheel Development Phil Johnson FESS Program Manager Boeing Phantom Works DOE Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Superconducting Flywheel Development Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 2 Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. 50kW / 5kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Off-Grid Demo System Objective: *Design, build and deliver a flywheel energy storage system tailored for off- grid applications utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) Bearing Goal: *Successfully integrate the FESS system into a demonstration site One of three deployment options for the demo system, shown in relation to

12

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Sept , 2008 Peer Review Sept , 2008 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Superconducting Flywheel Development 2 Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Flywheel Energy Storage Systems Objective: *Design, build and deliver flywheel energy storage systems utilizing high temperature superconducting (HTS) bearings tailored for uninterruptible power systems and off-grid applications Goal: *Successfully integrate FESS into a demonstration site through cooperative agreements with DOE and contracts with Sandia National Labs Deployment of a demo system, shown in relation to diesel genset and balance of system. Over All Status:

13

2007 Annual Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2007 Annual Peer Review 2007 Annual Peer Review September 27, 2007 San Francisco, California Welcoming Remarks Imre Gyuk US Dept. of Energy DOE / ESS Program Overview (View .pdf) John Boyes Sandia National Laboratories PRESENTATIONS\ ECONOMICS - BENEFIT STUDIES Evaluating Value Propositions for Four Modular Electricity Storage Demonstrations in California (View .pdf) Jim Eyer (Distributed Utility Assoc.) Update on Benefit and Cost Comparison of Modular Energy Storage Technologies for Four Viable Value Propositions (View .pdf) Susan Schoenung (Longitude 122 West, Inc.) ECONOMICS - ENVIRONMENT BENEFITS STUDIES Emissions from Traditional & Flywheel Plants for Regulation Services (View .pdf) Rick Fioravanti (KEMA, Inc.) UTILITY & COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS

14

NETL: 2010 - Carbon Sequestration Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carbon Sequestration Peer Review Carbon Sequestration Peer Review During March 15 - 19, 2010, a total of 16 projects from NETL's Carbon Sequestration Program were peer reviewed....

15

NETL: 2013 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs NETL: 2013 - Carbon Capture Peer Review Carbon Storage Peer Review During October 22 - 26, 2012, a total of 16 projects...

16

NETL: 2011 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs Advanced Energy Systems Peer Review Advanced Energy Systems Peer Review During April 23 - 27, 2012, a total of 16 projects...

17

Assessment of Financial Savings from Peer Reviews of In-Progress Projects: A Case Study from the Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Results of a study to assess the financial savings to the Department of Energys (DOE) Hydrogen Program due to decisions made from peer reviews.

18

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review - DOE Peer Review - Sept, 2007 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Superconducting Flywheel Development 2 Flywheel Energy Storage Systems Objective: *Design, build and deliver flywheel energy storage systems utilizing high temperature superconducting (HTS) bearings tailored for uninterruptible power systems and off-grid applications Goal: *Successfully integrate FESS into a demonstration site through cooperative agreements with DOE and contracts with Sandia National Labs Deployment of a demo system, shown in relation to diesel genset and balance of system. Status: *The 1 kWh / 3 kW test was successful

19

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_SAR.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

a Peer Review of a "Synthesis and Assessment Report on a Peer Review of a "Synthesis and Assessment Report on Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario Development and Application" Pursuant to Section V of the "Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under the authority of the Information Quality Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-554), the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) announces a plan for a peer review of its Synthesis and Assessment Report 2.1 entitled "Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario Development and Application" The CCSP (see http://www.climatescience.gov for details) integrates federal

20

Peer assessment using arop  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Arop is a web-based peer assessment support tool that has been used extensively in a wide variety of settings over the past three years. We describe the design of Arop and how it can be configured, and present some results from a research ...

John Hamer; Catherine Kell; Fiona Spence

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_CCSP.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Peer Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program the Peer Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Report entitled 'Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications' Pursuant to Section V of the "Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under the authority of the Information Quality Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-554), the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) announces a plan for the peer review of its Synthesis and Assessment Report entitled 'Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications'. The CCSP is an interagency research, planning, and coordinating entity that integrates federal research on climate and global change, as sponsored by thirteen federal agencies and overseen by the Office of Science and Technology

22

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

23

Peer Review 2012 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

12 Peer Review 2012 September 30, 2012 Subject: Department of Energy, Peer Review for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2012 Reviewer: Treasury Inspector General for Tax...

24

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. The full presentations are available below. Presentation summaries are also available. 2012 R&M Peer Review - Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs 2012 R&M Peer Review - Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch - Pravin Varaiya 2012 R&M Peer Review - Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman 2012 R&M Peer Review - Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework - Hsiao-Dong Chiang 2012 R&M Peer Review - Essence of Structure Preserving Network Reductions -

25

ORAU: Scientific and Technical Peer Review Services fact sheet  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to ensure timely and fair assessments for informed funding decisions. Scientific and Technical Peer Review Services Unmatched Access to Scientific and Technical Reviewers ORAU is...

26

FEMP Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Panel Report Panel Report September 20-21, 2005 FEMP PEER REVIEW PANEL Paul DeCotis, Chair New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Floyd E. Barwig Iowa Energy Center Richard S. Brent Solar Turbines, Inc. Bruce Gross Dominion Federal Corporation Kenneth L. James Pacific Gas and Electric Company Meg Matt The Matt Group Richard A. Morgan Morgan Marketing Partners Francis J. Murray, Jr. Energy/Environmental Consultant Maria Papadakis James Madison University Polly N. Shaw Consultant Susan E. Stratton Energy Center of Wisconsin James J. Winebrake, Ph.D. Rochester Institute of Technology David B. Zabetakis David B. Zabetakis, LLC November 4, 2005 Mr. Rick Khan, Program Manager Federal Energy Management Program U.S. Department of Energy

27

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW FINAL REPORT  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT 2/21/06 Background Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) signed a cooperative agreement with DOE on 9/30/04 to develop a novel gasifier concept, which is expected to improve the availability and efficiency of gasification-based power plants, and to reduce plant capital and operations costs. On 12/21/05, PWR submitted a proposal to continue development of their gasifier into the next phase. On January 24, 2006, a peer review was performed to review the work that PWR has done to date, their technical approach for future development, and to assess the potential benefit of the PWR gasifier and feed system technologies over state-of-the art coal gasification. The peer reviewers also evaluated a DOE analysis of the PWR refractory, and a DOE system study comparing the

28

NETL: 2011 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carbon Capture Peer Review During July 18 - 21, 2011, a total of 16 projects from NETL's Innovations for Existing Plants and Carbon Sequestration Programs were peer reviewed....

29

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review Planning  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Planning Planning Woman participating in a peer review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) begins the peer review planning process by analyzing the purpose of the funds to be distributed. Because each agency's needs are different, ORISE then designs and manages a flexible, scientific peer review process that can be modified based on a sponsor's regulatory, policy and operational requirements. ORISE's existing tools and systems, and knowledge of reviewing proposals from a government agency perspective, are helping to promote the quality and credibility of scientific information and funded research. ORISE's peer review planning process ensures each objective review is completed on schedule, within budget and with a high degree of process integrity.

30

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in

31

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to focus additional resources. Peer Reviews are intended to meet the requirements of DOE Order 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets,...

32

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rulemaking Rulemaking Peer Review Report - Supporting Documentation Submitted Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy March 2007 Table of Contents PROJECT ABSTRACTS ................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................ 16 SLIDE PRESENTATIONS ON JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .................................................. 104 PEER REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM.................................................................. 201 PEER REVIEW AGENDA JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .........................................................

33

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer...

34

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews Peer Reviews SMART GRID PROGRAM 2012 Agenda and Presentations, San Diego, CA, June 7-8, 2012 2010 Agenda and Presentations, Denver, CO, November 2-4, 2010 2008 Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration Agenda, Red Bank, NJ, October 29-30, 2008 TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY 2013 Reliability & Markets Agenda and Presentations, Ithaca, NY, August 6-7, 2013 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, June 27-28, 2013 2012 Load as a Resource Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, September 20, 2012 2012 Reliability & Markets Agenda and Presentations, Ithaca, NY, August 7-8, 2012 2012 Advanced Applications Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, June 12-13, 2012 2010 Agenda and Presentations, and Final Report, Alexandria, VA,

35

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems...

36

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality...

37

NETL: Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews Coal and Power Systems Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs NETL is conducting a series of independent Peer Reviews of its Strategic Center for Coal Technology Programs in accordance with Departmental guidelines. Using a standard set of selection criteria, each technology program selects between 15 and 20 projects to be peer reviewed that represent the program's project portfolio and a significant portion of their fiscal year budget. Selected projects undergo a rigorous review during which the Principal Investigators summarize the status of their research, accomplishments, and future planned activities to an independent panel of experts. Projects are evaluated using a standard set of metrics to assess the progress of the Project Team towards achieving the Statements of Project Objectives as well as specific project milestones of the research. Following the Peer Review, NETL uses the results to guide and redirect the projects, as appropriate, underscoring NETL's commitment to funding and managing a portfolio of high-quality research.

38

An algorithm to determine peer-reviewers  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The peer-review process is the most widely accepted certification mechanism for officially accepting the written results of researchers within the scientific community. An essential component of peer-review is the identification of competent referees ... Keywords: co-authorship networks, peer-review process

Marko A. Rodriguez; Johan Bollen

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through V) are available below. Session I: Dan Trudnowski, Ning Zhou, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session II: Brett Amidan, Bharat Bhargava, Ning Zhou Session III: Ken Martin, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session IV: Jeff Dagle, Jim Dyer, Joe Gracia, Joe Eto Session V: Joe Eto 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Measurement-Based Stability Assessment - Dan Trudnowski, U Montana 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Mode Meter Development - Ning

40

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Ben Hobbs (Johns Hopkins), Kameshwar Poolla (UC Berkeley) Session II: Ray Zimmerman (Cornell), Hsiao-Dong Chiang (Cornell) Session III: Shmuel Oren (UC Berkeley), Dan Tylavsky (U Arizona), Tom Overbye (U Illinois) Session IV: Lindsay Anderson (Cornell), HyungSeon Oh (Cornell) 2013 R&M Peer Review - Assessing Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs, Johns Hopkins 2013 R&M Peer Review - Coordinated Aggregation of Distributed Energy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

FEMP Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FEMP's mission and goals * Relevance to technical and market challenges * Management In addition, the panel assessed FEMP's congruence with the mission and goals of the...

42

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 13 presentations over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentations are available through the links. The agenda and list of presentations are included below. The Reliability and Markets activity of the Transmission Reliability program researches, develops, and implements electricity infrastructure and market simulations that integrate economics and engineering principles. The activity helps to ensure electric reliability, while also improving the efficiency and economics of market operations. Day 1: August 6 Session I Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty, Ben Hobbs,

43

PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report from the Peer Review Panel Report from the Peer Review Panel on activities within the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Team Members: Kathryn Newcomer, The George Washington University (Chair) Irwin Feller, The Pennsylvania State University (Retired) Stephanie Shipman, Government Accountability Office Kathleen Sedlak O'Brien, Environmental Protection Agency Faith Lambert, EERE Final Report February 1, 2008 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) within the U.S. Department of Energy asked a panel of experts with relevant knowledge to review the evaluation activities of the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit (PAE) within EERE's Office of Planning, Budget and

44

Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process Final Report December 2001 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. CONTENTS Summary Objectives International perspective Recommendations for future assessments 1 Introduction 1.1 Background to the Yucca Mountain Project 1.2 Terms of reference, objectives and scope of the review 1.3 Conduct of the review 1.4 Organisation of this report 2 General Considerations 2.1 Regulatory perspective 2.2 Performance assessment rationale 2.3 General approach to performance assessment 2.4 Documentation 3 Sub-system methodology 3.1 Repository design

45

Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

emdoe.gov emdoe.gov Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management (ASCEM) Independent Peer Review and Assessment Team Report Technology Innovation and Development Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy September 15, 2010 Table of Contents Transmission Memorandum . . . . . . . . 1 ASCEM IPRA Team . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Findings and Observations . . . . . . . . . 5 Appendices 1: Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2: Biographical Information . . . . . 8 3: ASCEM IPRA CHARTER . . . . . 10 4: Conflict of Interest Form . . . . . 16 i Intentional Blank Page

46

EERE Peer Review Guide - August 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PEER REVIEW GUIDE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Based on a Survey of Best Practices for In-Progress Peer Review Prepared by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Peer Review Task Force August 2004 EERE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Acknowledgements DOE/EERE, and the Peer Review Task Force particularly, acknowledge the generous and important contributions to this Guide of Review Panel Chairman Ronald N. Kostoff, Office of Naval Research, and expert panel members and reviewers: Greg Stover, NASA; Paul Doremus, NIST; Richard Silberglitt, Rand; Kerry L. Dearfield, EPA; Jim Cassatt, NIH; Daryl Chubin, NACME; Fiona Wood, Australia; Frans van den Beemt, Netherlands; Larry James, DOE; and David Tratt, NASA. Notice This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States

47

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Presentations 1 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through V) are available below. Session I: Dan Trudnowski, Ning Zhou, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session II: Brett Amidan, Bharat Bhargava, Ning Zhou Session III: Ken Martin, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session IV: Jeff Dagle, Jim Dyer, Joe Gracia, Joe Eto Session V: Joe Eto 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Measurement-Based Stability Assessment - Dan Trudnowski, U Montana 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Mode Meter Development - Ning Zhou, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Oscillation Monitoring System

48

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW FINAL REPORT  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT 22106 Background Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) signed a cooperative agreement with DOE on 93004 to develop a novel gasifier concept, which...

49

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Conservation Standards Rulemaking Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report Prepared Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy February 2007 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 4 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 6 2. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................... 6 3. SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 7

50

Convergent contemporary software peer review practices  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Software peer review is practiced on a diverse set of software projects that have drastically different settings, cultures, incentive systems, and time pressures. In an effort to characterize and understand these differences we examine two Google-led ... Keywords: Empirical Software Engineering, Inspection, Open source software, Peer code review, Software firms

Peter C. Rigby; Christian Bird

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on...

52

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The...

53

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Peer Review Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum...

54

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations are available through the individual session links. The agenda and introduction by Joe Eto, LBNL, are available below. Day 1: June 27 Session I Baselining Studies and Analysis, Bharat Bhargava, EPG Baselining Studies and Analysis, Brett Amidan, PNNL Synchrophasor Standards Support and Development, Ken Martin, EPG Session II Advanced Synchrophasor Metrology, Stan Hadley, ORNL GPS Issue Management, Mark Buckner, ORNL Technology Assessment for Next Generation PMU, Mark Buckner, ORNL Session III Measurement-Based Stability Assessment, Dan Trudnowski, U. Montana

55

NETL: 2010 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (AIGCC) Peer Review Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (AIGCC)...

56

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Home Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...

57

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University...

58

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Economics Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Economics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Economics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September...

59

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the...

60

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AgendaPresentation List Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - AgendaPresentation List The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power...

62

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National...

63

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage...

64

2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available 2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis...

65

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis...

66

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

These reports summarize the comments of expert peer reviewers at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, where each year projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells...

67

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 -...

68

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 -...

69

Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review With mounting evidence suggesting an increased probability that malicious attacks may be launched against energy control systems, there is a critical need to understand specific cyber vulnerabilities and corresponding mitigation strategies. This need is being addressed by SCADA/ Energy Management System (EMS) Cyber Security Assessments conducted at the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) facility at INL and at on-site field installations of control systems. Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review More Documents & Publications DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan DOE National SCADA Test Bed Program Multi-Year Plan Vulnerability Analysis of Energy Delivery Control Systems - 2011

70

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Presentations 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Ben Hobbs (Johns Hopkins), Kameshwar Poolla (UC Berkeley) Session II: Ray Zimmerman (Cornell), Hsiao-Dong Chiang (Cornell) Session III: Shmuel Oren (UC Berkeley), Dan Tylavsky (U Arizona), Tom Overbye (U Illinois) Session IV: Lindsay Anderson (Cornell), HyungSeon Oh (Cornell) 2013 R&M Peer Review - Assessing Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs, Johns Hopkins 2013 R&M Peer Review - Coordinated Aggregation of Distributed Energy Resources - Kameshwar Poolla, UC Berkeley

71

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability & Markets Peer Review Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentations and summaries are available through the links and the agenda is included below. Summaries | Full Presentations Day 1: August 7 Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty About Fuel Prices, Technology, Renewables Penetration and Market Responses Using a Multi-State Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch and Distributed Resource Aggregations Development and Testing of New Tools Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework: Phase 2 Essence of Structure Preserving (ESP) Network Reductions for

72

Energy Storage Systems 2005 Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on October 20, 2005 in San Francisco, CA. The agenda and ESS program overview presentation are below.

73

International Review Team Report: A Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain IMARC Total System Performance Assessment EPRI Model  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Since 1989, EPRI has been conducting independent assessments of the proposed deep geologic repository for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. EPRI pioneered application of the total system performance assessment (TSPA) approach for evaluating performance of geologic repository systems on a probabilistic basis. Along the way, EPRI developed the Integrated Multiple Assumptions and Release Code (IMARC) as its primary analytical tool for TSPA-based e...

2009-04-22T23:59:59.000Z

74

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentati...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Electronics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer...

75

VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS PROGRAM AGENDA Marriott Crystal City at Reagan National Airport 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway Arlington, Virginia 22202 October 18, 2006 7:30 - 8:30 a.m. Continental Breakfast Times CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTROL SYSTEMS SECURITY 8:30 - 8:45 Introduction - Phil Overholt philip.overholt@hq.doe.gov Introduction - Hank Kenchington henry.kenchington@hq.doe.gov 8:45 - 9:15 Overview of Reliability and Markets Bob Thomas, PSERC/Cornell Univ. rjt1@cornell.edu Cyber Security Assessments of Control Systems in the Energy Sector Bob Hill, INL robert.hill@inl.gov 9:15 - 9:45 Market Monitoring Tools Bernard Lesieutre, LBNL bclesieutre@lbnl.gov Cyber Security Assessments of Inter Control Center Communications Protocol Implementations

76

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review 6 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The agenda and ESS program overview are available below. Day 1 morning session presentations Day 1 afternoon session presentations Day 2 morning session presentations Day 2 afternoon session presentations ESS 2006 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - ESS Program Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications

77

Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications 23 August 2013 Oklahoma Biological Survey, ES Bridge and WF Frick. In Review. Energetics of and Abundant Aerial Insectivore: The Purple Martin aeroecology: exploring the movements of aerial fauna through radio-wave remote sensing. Biology Letters 8: 698

Kelly, Jeff

78

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Peer Review 7 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. The agenda and ESS program overview presentation are below. Presentation categories Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Program Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage

79

Energy Storage Systems 2009 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 Peer Review 09 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2009 Peer Review The DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted an annual peer review in Seattle, WA on October 8, 2009. The 1-day conference included welcoming remarks from OE's Imre Gyuk as well as a program overview from John Boyes of Sandia National Laboratories and 11 presentations on individual projects. The agenda, program overview, and project presentations are available below. ESS 2009 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - DOE-ESS Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Long Island Bus NaS Battery Energy Storage Project - Steve Eckroad, EPRI.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Development of an Integrated Power Controller Based on HT SOI and SiC - Joseph Henfling, SNL.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Large Format Carbon Enhanced VRLA Battery Test

80

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer reviewed by qualified specialists before it is disseminated by the federal government. We published a proposed Bulletin on September 15, 2003. Based on public comments, we published a revised proposal for additional comment on April 28, 2004. We are now finalizing the April version, with minor revisions responsive to the public's comments. The purpose of the Bulletin is to enhance the quality and credibility of the government's scientific information. We recognize that different types of peer review are appropriate for different types of information. Under this Bulletin, agencies are granted broad

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

2010 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2010 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability research area focuses on two key areas: 1) Real-Time Grid Reliability Management and 2) Reliability and Markets. The first area develops monitoring and analysis tools that process synchrophasor data to enable real-time assessment of grid status and stability margins, with the goal of improving power system reliability and visibility through wide-area measurement and control. It is developing advanced technologies and tools to help create a resilient electric transmission system that can better detect disturbances, accommodate a variety of generation sources, and automatically reconfigure the grid to prevent widespread outages and/or rebalance the system. The second area

82

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon 6 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Energy Storage and Wyoming Wind Power - Mindi Farber de Anda, SAIC.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Hybrid Generation Simulator - David Trujillo, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Modular Energy Storage Benefit and Cost for Three Emerging Value Propositions - Susan Schoenung, Longitude 122 West.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Sprint - Kevin Kenny.pdf

83

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning 6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 morning session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - EESAT 2007 Conference Information - Georgianne Peek, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Ultracapacitor EnergyBridge UPS - Chris McKay, Northern Power.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Flywheel-based Frequency Regulation Demonstration Projects - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Design of the FESS 20MW Frequency Regulation Plant -

84

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 1 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Laboratory Scale FACTS Conroller Development - Mariesa Crow, U Missouri, Rolla.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - 100kW Low Cost Energy Storage Inverter - Larry Rinehart, Rinehart Motions.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - ETO Light Power Converter for FACTS & Energy Storage Applications - Alex Huang, NCSU.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-based Power Converter

85

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review 2 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations are available through the individual session links. The agenda and participant list are available below. Presentations June 12 - Day 1: Session I, Session II, Session III, Session IV, Session V June 13 - Day 2: Session VI, Session VII 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Agenda 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Participant List More Documents & Publications 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2

86

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Converters - Marcelo Schupbach, APEI.pdf ESPE 2008 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-Based Power Converter System - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf ESPE 2008 Peer Review - SiC Power...

87

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applications - Alex Huang, NCSU.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-based Power Converter System - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Optically...

88

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United Silicon Carbide ESS 2012 Peer Review - 15 kV Phase Leg Power Modules with SiC Devices - Ranbir Singh, GeneSiC Semiconductor ESS 2012 Peer Review - Experimental...

89

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage...

90

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted...

91

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Day 1, Session 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update...

92

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports on Facebook Tweet about...

93

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4,...

94

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Ray Byrne, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - National Assessment of Energy Storage for Grid Balancing and Arbitrage - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-EPRI Energy Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA - Abbas Akhil, SNL More Documents & Publications

95

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Ray Byrne, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - National Assessment of Energy Storage for Grid Balancing and Arbitrage - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-EPRI Energy Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA - Abbas Akhil, SNL More Documents & Publications

96

How important tasks are performed: peer review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The advancement of various fields of science depends on the actions of individual scientists via the peer review process. The referees' work patterns and stochastic nature of decision making both relate to the particular features of refereeing and to the universal aspects of human behavior. Here, we show that the time a referee takes to write a report on a scientific manuscript depends on the final verdict. The data is compared to a model, where the review takes place in an ongoing competition of completing an important composite task with a large number of concurrent ones - a Deadline -effect. In peer review human decision making and task completion combine both long-range predictability and stochastic variation due to a large degree of ever-changing external "friction".

Hartonen, T; 10.1038/srep01679

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

97

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Presentation Summaries |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review - Presentation Summaries Review - Presentation Summaries 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Presentation Summaries The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentation summaries are available below. The full presentations are also available. 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Transmission Investment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch - Pravin Varaiya 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework - Hsiao-Dong Chiang 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Essence of Structure Preserving Network

98

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 afternoon 2 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Energy Storage and Wyoming Wind Power - Mindi Farber de Anda, SAIC.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Hybrid Generation Simulator - David Trujillo, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Modular Energy Storage Benefit and Cost for Three Emerging Value Propositions - Susan Schoenung, Longitude 122 West.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Sprint - Kevin Kenny.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Emerson Network Power - Paul Misar.pdf

99

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 morning 1 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 1 morning session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - NAS Battery Performance at Charleston, WV - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Evaluation of the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative System for Energy Storage Potential - Abbas Akhil, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Plant - Bob Haug, ISEPA.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Superconducting Flywheel Development - Phil Johnson, Boeing.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Bipolar NiMH Battery Development and Testing - James

100

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARPA-E project presentations from the first poster session on Day 1, chaired by DOE's Mark Johnson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Dispatchable Wind--Wind Power on Demand - Ian Lawson, General Compression ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel Regenerative Fuel Cells based on Anion Exchange Membranes - Katherine Ayers, Proton Onsite ESS 2012 Peer Review - Low Cost, High-Energy Density Flywheel Storage Grid

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations 2 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available 2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis Presentations from two peer reviews in September are now available. The Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology Solutions (CERTS) Transmission Reliability R&D Load as a Resource (LAAR) Program peer review included five presentations on September 20, 2012, hosted by DOE at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. DOE's Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on September 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included nine sessions and two poster sessions. Addthis Related Articles 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available

102

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Session Morning Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the Day 1 morning session are below. Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC - Tom Rizy, ORNL 2012 SG Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Energy Surety, Microgrids - Mike Hightower, SNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Grid Standards and Conformance Testing - Tom Basso, NREL 2012 SG Peer Review - GridLAB-D and Integrated T&D Control - David Chassin,

103

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from Day 2 morning session are below. Moderator: Merrill Smith, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ron Melton, Battelle Memorial Institute 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LADWP Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Project - Mukhlesur Bhuiyan, City of Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: AEP Ohio gridSMART Demonstration

104

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer...

105

Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review » Fiscal Peer Review » Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review In November 2011, the Water Power Program held their Annual Peer Review Meeting in Alexandria, Virginia. The purpose of the meeting was to evaluate DOE-funded hydropower and marine and hydrokinetic R&D projects for their contribution to the mission and goals of the Water Power Program and to assess progress made against stated objectives. At the review, approximately 85 projects were presented, representing a DOE investment of over $100 million over the last few years. In addition to the formal review, this event was an excellent opportunity for the water power community to share ideas and solutions to address challenges facing the hydropower and marine and hydrokinetic energy industries.

106

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A consensus peer review of the current technical basis and the planned experimental and modeling program for the prediction of the long-term performance of waste package materials being considered for use in a proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A Compilation of Special Topic Reports Wastepackagematerials_PPRP_final.pdf Evaluation of the Final Report: Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Panel Multi-Purpose_Canister_System_Evaluation.pdf More Documents & Publications Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion Cracking/Fatigue Modeling for Light Water

107

Commercial Lighting Solutions, Webtool Peer Review Report  

SciTech Connect

The Commercial Lighting Solutions (CLS) project directly supports the U.S. Department of Energys Commercial Building Energy Alliance efforts to design high performance buildings. CLS creates energy efficient best practice lighting designs for widespread use, and they are made available to users via an interactive webtool that both educates and guides the end user through the application of the Lighting Solutions. This report summarizes the peer review of the beta version of the CLS webtool, which contains retail box lighting solutions. The methodology for the peer review process included data collection (stakeholder input), analysis of the comments, and organization of the input into categories for prioritization of the comments against a set of criteria. Based on this process, recommendations were developed about which feedback should be addressed for the release of version 1.0 of the webtool at the Lightfair conference in New York City in May 2009. Due to the volume of data (~500 comments) the methodology for addressing the peer review comments was central to the success of the ultimate goal of improving the tool. The comments were first imported into a master spreadsheet, and then grouped and organized in several layers. Solutions to each comment were then rated by importance and feasibility to determine the practicality of resolving the concerns of the commenter in the short-term or long-term. The rating system was used as an analytical tool, but the results were viewed thoughtfully to ensure that they were not the sole the factor in determining which comments were recommended for near-term resolution. The report provides a list of the top ten most significant and relevant improvements that will be made within the webtool for version 1.0 as well as appendices containing the short-term priorities in additional detail. Peer review comments that are considered high priority by the reviewers and the CLS team but cannot be completed for Version 1.0 are listed as long-term recommendations.

Jones, Carol C.; Meyer, Tracy A.

2009-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

108

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. University project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Strategies for Liquid-Anode Alkali Batteries of High Energy Density Operating at 0 to 100 C - C Austen Angell, AZ State ESS 2012 Peer Review - Iron Based Flow Batteries for Low Cost Grid Level Energy Storage - Jesse Wainright, Case Western Reserve

109

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARRA project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - 20 MW Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Implementation of Community ESS for Grid Support - Haukur Asgeirsson, Detroit Edison ESS 2012 Peer Review - Notrees Wind Storage - Jeff Gates, Duke Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Compressed Air Energy Storage - Robert Booth,

110

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Reviews in June and July Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July June 12, 2012 - 9:31am Addthis The Department of Energy will hold peer reviews for the Real Time Reliability Management program and the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) program this summer. Peer reviews are an opportunity for energy sector stakeholders to hear updates on ongoing and upcoming projects, provide feedback to program managers, and network with experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories. June 12-13, 2012: Real Time Reliability Management (RTGRM) The Transmission Reliability R&D Program will conduct a peer review of the Real Time Grid Reliability Management RTGRM is part of DOE's Transmission Reliability R&D Program and includes projects in support of the North

111

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Afternoon Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Afternoon Session 1 Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from Day 1 afternoon sessions are below. Moderators: Eric Lightner and Merrill Smith 2012 SG Peer Review - GridWise Architecture Council - Ron Melton, PNNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Expanded Demand Response Functionality - Graham Parker, PNNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project - Mani Venkata, Alstom 2012 SG Peer Review - Enhanced DMS Capabilities Supporting Distribution Network DER - Tristan Glenwright, Boeing

112

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. SBIR project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Higher Power Motor for ARPA-E Flywheel - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Acid Based Blend Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries - Alan Cisar, Lynntech ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage

113

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Presentations 2 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions VI and VII) are available below. Session VI: Yuri Makarov, Henry Huang, Jim McCalley Session VII: Carlos Martinez, Pete Sauer, Gil Tam 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Real-Time Wide-Area Montoring Tool Based on CELL Method - Yuri Makarov, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Modal Analysis for Grid Operations (MANGO) - Henry Huang, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - New Security Tools for Real-Time Operations - Jim McCalley, Iowa State 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Automatic Reliability Reports

114

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. National lab project presentations from the first poster session on Day 1, chaired by DOE's Mark Johnson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Metrics for Storage and Pre-Standards Analyses - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Oahu Energy Storage Study - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Soowhan Kim, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Engineered Gate Oxides for Wide Bandgap Semiconductor MOSFETs - Jon Ihlefeld, SNL

115

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARRA project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - 20 MW Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Implementation of Community ESS for Grid Support - Haukur Asgeirsson, Detroit Edison ESS 2012 Peer Review - Notrees Wind Storage - Jeff Gates, Duke Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Compressed Air Energy Storage - Robert Booth,

116

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July June 12, 2012 - 9:31am Addthis The Department of Energy will hold peer reviews for the Real Time Reliability Management program and the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) program this summer. Peer reviews are an opportunity for energy sector stakeholders to hear updates on ongoing and upcoming projects, provide feedback to program managers, and network with experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories. June 12-13, 2012: Real Time Reliability Management (RTGRM) The Transmission Reliability R&D Program will conduct a peer review of the Real Time Grid Reliability Management RTGRM is part of DOE's Transmission Reliability R&D Program and includes projects in support of the North

117

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial 7 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to utility, commercial, and rail applications of advanced energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Application of Large-Scale ESS in AEP - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Park - Kent Holst, ISEP.pdf

118

Peer Review 2008 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Subject: Report on the Quality Assessment Review of the Investigative Operations of the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Energy Reviewer: U.S. Small...

119

Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly. Part II  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In our previous work (Scientometrics 87:293---301, 2011), a numerical model of over-competitive research funding in "peer-group-assessed-grant-based-funding-system" was proposed and the process was firstly investigated quantitatively. The simulation ... Keywords: 60H99, C15, C32, Cosmology, Excessive competition, Mainstream, Peer review, Publications, Research funding

Xuan Zhen Liu; Hui Fang

2012-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Electronics Power Electronics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to power electronics are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - StatCom with Energy Storage to Smooth Intermittent Power Output of Wind Farms - Mesut Baran, NC State.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Cyber-Physical Systems Distributed Control - Mariesa

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Energy International Energy Storage Program Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage Program Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to international energy storage programs are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - DOE-CEC Energy Storage Program FY07 Projects - Daniel Borneo, SNL.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Joint NYSERDA-DOE Energy Storage Initiative Projects

122

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility & Commercial Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to utility, commercial, and rail applications of advanced energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Application of Large-Scale ESS in AEP - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Park - Kent Holst, ISEP.pdf

123

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Innovations in ESS Innovations in ESS Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to innovations in energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics ESS 2007 Peer Review - Evaluation of Lead-Carbon Storage Devices for Utility Applications - Enders Dickinson, MeadWestvaco.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - High Voltage Electrochemical Capacitor - David

124

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

125

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Visualization and Modeling National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

126

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best PracticesStandards Development National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

127

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practice DesignConfiguration National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

128

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Software Engineering Institute National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

129

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Secure Communications National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

130

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wind--Wind Power on Demand - Ian Lawson, General Compression ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel Regenerative Fuel Cells based on Anion Exchange Membranes - Katherine Ayers, Proton Onsite...

131

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for...

132

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

133

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Energy Storage Program Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage Program Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

134

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CECDOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDADOE...

135

Geothermal Technologies Program 2010 Peer Review | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Number NA DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Geothermal Technologies Program 2010 Peer Review Citation Joe Iovenitti....

136

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LLC 35 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421-3102 www.TIAXLLC.com Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update...

137

Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's High Temperature Superconductivity (HTS) for...

138

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_SAR.doc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Publications Microsoft Word - PeerReviewCCSP.doc Microsoft Word - Cross Reference Matrix Introduction.doc DRAFT NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change...

139

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews | U.S...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

140

2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fact Sheets Meetings & Events Electric Distribution R&D FY05 Annual Program and Peer Review Meeting April 19 & 20, 2005 Georgia Tech Conference Center Atlanta, Georgia Agenda...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Software peer review has proven to be a successful technique in open source software (OSS) development. In contrast to industry, where reviews are typically assigned to specific individuals, changes are broadcast to hundreds of potentially interested ... Keywords: case studies, grounded theory, open source software, peer review

Peter C. Rigby; Margaret-Anne Storey

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

ESS 2012 Peer Review - National Assessment of Energy Storage for Grid Balancing and Arbitrage - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Assessment of Energy Storage Assessment of Energy Storage for Grid Balancing and Arbitrage October 2, 2012 1 Authors: M. Kintner-Meyer, P. Balducci, W. Colella, M. Elizondo, C. Jin, T. Nguyen, V. Viswanathan, Y.Zhang Pacific Northwest National Laboratory MICHAEL KINTNER-MEYER Energy Storage Analytics Agenda October 2, 2012 2 National Assessment of Energy Storage Considering Regional Differences October 2, 2012 3 PHASE I WECC PHASE II EIC + ERCOT Objectives: Determine: future balancing requirements needed by 2020 to accommodate assumed 20% RPS, market size for storage and respective cost targets for balancing and energy arbitrage by regions most cost-effective technologies to meet add'l balancing requirements. Value: Provides plausible market potential estimates of energy storage for the

143

peer  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 AUDIT REPORT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S PEER REVIEW PRACTICES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES APRIL 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Acting Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION : Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Peer Review Practices" BACKGROUND Fulfilling the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 has presented Federal science agencies with the challenge of defining ways to quantify and evaluate the outcomes of research. Measuring research program performance is particularly important for the Department of Energy because of its substantial investment (approximately $7 billion in Fiscal Year 1996) in research and development

144

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. Power Electronics (PE) Systems presentations are available below. ESPE 2008 Peer Review - High Power Density Silicon Carbide Power Electronic

145

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. Energy Storage Systems (ESS) presentations are available below. ESPE 2008 Peer Review - EAC Energy Storage Subcommittee - Brad Roberts, S&C

146

Total energy cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: an energy and environmental analysis. Volume 4: peer review comments on technical report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report compares the energy use, oil use and emissions of electric vehicles (EVs) with those of conventional, gasoline-powered vehicles (CVs) over the total life cycle of the vehicles. The various stages included in the vehicles` life cycles include vehicle manufacture, fuel production, and vehicle operation. Disposal is not included. An inventory of the air emissions associated with each stage of the life cycle is estimated. Water pollutants and solid wastes are reported for individual processes, but no comprehensive inventory is developed. Volume IV includes copies of all the external peer review comments on the report distributed for review in July 1997.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

147

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Page 1 of 3 Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Page 1 of 3 U.S. Department of Energy Smart Grid R&D Peer Review San Diego Gas & Electric Energy Innovation Center 4760 Clairemont Mesa Blvd San Diego, California June 7-8, 2012 AGENDA Thursday, June 7, 2012 8:00 am Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 am - 8:40 am Welcome David Geier, Vice President Electric Operations, San Diego Gas & Electric 8:40 am - 9:00 am OE's R&D Division/Smart Grid R&D Program Hank Kenchington/Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy Moderator - Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy 9:00 am - 9:30 am Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC Tom Rizy, ORNL 9:30 am - 10:00 am CERTS Microgrid Test Bed Joe Eto, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

148

2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Information Center » Library » Peer Reviews » 2005 Electric Information Center » Library » Peer Reviews » 2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations 2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations Electric Distribution R&D FY05 Annual Program and Peer Review Meeting April 19 & 20, 2005 Georgia Tech Conference Center Atlanta, Georgia Agenda (PDF 96 KB) Plenary Sessions Welcome and Our New Office of Electricity and Energy Assurance - Kevin Kolevar, DOE Overview of the Electric Distribution R&D - Eric Lightner, DOE Presentation (PDF 883 KB). GridWise Architectural Council - Rik Drummond, Drummond Group, Inc. Presentation (PDF 1.5 MB). Advanced Grid Application Consortium (GridApp) - James Crane, Exelon Corp. Presentation (PDF 1.6 MB). Session 1: Monitoring and Load Management Technologies

149

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting June 16, 2014...

150

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 14, 2010 FY10-42 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-Oak Ridge Associated Universities has appointed Tony Lester as director of the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education's program focused on scientific peer review. Lester has been serving in this role in an acting capacity since September 2009. Tony Lester Tony Lester In his role, Lester manages a research peer review capability that coordinates the use of independent, expert reviewers to determine the scientific technical feasibility of proposals submitted in response to government agency research needs. His team works closely with the federal government to provide liaison, consultation and operations support during the planning and execution of customers' grant management cycles. The

151

Assessment of Financial Savings from Peer Reviews of In-Progress Projects: A Case Study from the Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Financial Savings Financial Savings From Peer Reviews of In-Progress Projects: A Case Study from the Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program Prepared By: Yaw O. Agyeman, TMS, Inc. with Jeff Dowd, DOE Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Prepared for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy October 2008 Acknowledgments: Special thanks go to the following people who provided inputs to the study or review comments on an earlier draft of this paper. * EERE Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program - JoAnn Milliken, Nancy Garland, Sunita Satyapal, Antonio Ruiz, Roxanne Garland, and John Garbak. * Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis - Darrell Beschen and Randy Steer. * National Renewable Energy Laboratory - Neil Snyder and Bill Babiuch.

152

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below. Session V: Ken Martin (EPG), Jim Thorp (Virginia Tech), Scott Ghiocel (RPI), Mani Venkatasubramanian (WSU) Session VI: Pete Sauer (U Illinois), Carlos Martinez (ASR), Gil Tam (EPG) 2013 TR Review - Data Validation & Conditioning - Ken Martin, EPG 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Data Conditioning and Validation - Jim Thorp, Virginia Tech 2013 TR Review - PMU-based Voltage Stability - Scott Ghiocel, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2013 TR Review - Oscillation Monitoring System - Mani Venkatasubramanian,

153

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below. Session V: Ken Martin (EPG), Jim Thorp (Virginia Tech), Scott Ghiocel (RPI), Mani Venkatasubramanian (WSU) Session VI: Pete Sauer (U Illinois), Carlos Martinez (ASR), Gil Tam (EPG) 2013 TR Review - Data Validation & Conditioning - Ken Martin, EPG 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Data Conditioning and Validation - Jim Thorp, Virginia Tech 2013 TR Review - PMU-based Voltage Stability - Scott Ghiocel, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2013 TR Review - Oscillation Monitoring System - Mani Venkatasubramanian,

154

Thermophysical properties of uranium dioxide - Version 0 for peer review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Data on thermophysical properties of solid and liquid UO{sub 2} have been reviewed and critically assessed to obtain consistent thermophysical property recommendations for inclusion in the International Nuclear Safety Center Database on the World Wide Web (http://www.insc.anl.gov.). Thermodynamic properties that have been assessed are enthalpy, heat capacity, melting point, enthalpy of fusion, thermal expansion, density, surface tension, and vapor pressure. Transport properties that have been assessed are thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, viscosity, and emissivity. Summaries of the recommendations with uncertainties and detailed assessments for each property are included in this report and in the International Nuclear Safety Center Database for peer review. The assessments includes a review of the experiments and data, an examination of previous recommendations, the basis for selecting recommendations, a determination of uncertainties, and a comparison of recommendations with data and with previous recommendations. New data and research that have led to new recommendations include thermal expansion and density measurements of solid and liquid UO{sub 2}, derivation of physically-based equations for the thermal conductivity of solid UO{sub 2}, measurements of the heat capacity of liquid UO{sub 2}, and measurements and analysis of the thermal conductivity of liquid UO{sub 2}.

Fink, J.K.; Petri, M.C.

1997-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. The final agenda and welcome presentation are below. Presentations

156

NETL: SECA Workshop Proceedings, Peer Reviews, and Annual Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Solid State Energy Conversion Alliance (SECA) SECA Workshop Proceedings and Peer Reviews The proceedings from the all workshops that the SECA program has sponsored are described on this page. In addition, the Peer Review Results are also summarized. Annual Workshop Proceedings Core Technology Workshop Proceedings Peer Review Results 2008 SECA 9th Annual Workshop & Peer Review CD Cover Annual Workshop Proceedings 13th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2012) 12th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2011) 11th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2010) 10th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2009) 9th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (Aug 2008) 8th Annual SECA Workshop - San Antonio, TX (Aug 2007) 7th Annual SECA Workshop - Philadelphia, PA (Sept 2006)

157

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations are available through individual session links and the agenda is below. Presentations: Day 1: June 7 Morning session | Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE Afternoon sessions | Moderators: Eric Lightner and Merrill Smith, DOE Day 2: June 8 Morning session | Moderator: Merrill Smith, DOE Smart Grid Panel Discussion | Moderator: Lee Krevat, SDG&E First afternoon session | Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE Second afternoon session | Moderator: Eric Lightner, DOE

158

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentati...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems Distributed Control - Mariesa Crow, U Missouri-Rolla.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - SiC Power Converter System Thermal Mgmt and High Temp Packaging - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf...

159

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program...

160

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review for State and Federal Agencies  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE) supports federal agencies-such as the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), U.S. Department of Homeland Security...

162

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below....

163

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Flow Battery Modeling Energy Storage Systems Peer Review September 26-28, 2012 MJ Martinez (PI), J...

164

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TIAX LLC TIAX LLC 35 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421-3102 www.TIAXLLC.com Flow Battery Membrane Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012...

165

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. The final agenda and welcome presentation are below. Presentations

166

2012 Load as a Resource Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Load as a Resource Program Peer Review Load as a Resource Program Peer Review 2012 Load as a Resource Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Load as a Resource (LAAR) Program peer review included 8 presentations on September 20, 2012 at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Agenda and presentations are below. 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Agenda 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Frequency Response Demand - Jeff Dagle, PNNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Frequency Responsive Load Evaluation and Benefits - Isabelle Snyder, ORNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Load as a Regulation Resource, Phase 2 - Sila Kiliccote, LBNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation - Nasr Alkadi, ORNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Integration and Extension of Direct Load Management of Smart Loads - Anna Scaglioni, UC Davis

167

March, 2010 NIFS Administrative Council External Peer Review Committee  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

21 2010 3 March, 2010 NIFS Administrative Council External Peer Review Committee NIFS Peer DEMO LHD V NIFS-HEAT W Y Li MHD Er2O3 Li Li-Pb FlibeF-BeF2 #12;10 V 4 FlibeF-BeF2 been invoked to enhance the electron current in V3Ga. In the NIFS engineering research, the main goals

Ito, Atsushi

168

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secure Communications Secure Communications Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Secure Communications National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Secure Communications are below. CEDS 2010 Peer Review - Cryptographic Trust Management - Mark Hadley,

169

Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's High Temperature Superconductivity (HTS) for Electric Systems Program's specific mission is to work in partnership with industry to develop HTS wire and perform other research and development activities leading to the commercialization of HTS-based electric power applications by U.S. companies. This technology contributes to several key performance improvements of the grid. It enhances reliability by increasing capacity, which relieves congestion and helps prevent outages. Efficiency is improved as a result of the reduction of loss during operation which both conserves

170

Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1045_Peer Reviews Panel_Lehman Workshop Briefing w-headings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Science Science Peer Reviews 101 Daniel R. Lehman, Director Office of Project Assessment Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Peer Review 101 Panel Members Mr. Daniel Lehman, Director, Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Mr. Hanley Lee, Deputy Manager, SLAC Site Office (formerly SC Federal Project Director for the LCLS Project) Mr. James Krupnick, Associate Lab. Director/Chief Operating Officer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (formerly Project Director for the Molecular Foundry Project) Mr. Scott Samuelson, PMP Acting Director, NNSA Office of Major Systems Acquisitions (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) Office of Science Peer Reviews 101 (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) 2 Office of Science Peer Reviews 101

171

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Software Engineering Institute Software Engineering Institute Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Software Engineering Institute National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations from Carnegie Mellon University's Software Engineering

172

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Visualization and Modeling Visualization and Modeling Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Visualization and Modeling National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Visualization and Modeling are below.

173

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: Independent Peer Reviews  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen Manufacturing Fuel Cells Applications/Technology Validation Safety Codes and Standards Education Basic Research Systems Analysis Systems Integration Independent Reviews Macro-System Model U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Systems Integration > Independent Peer Reviews Printable Version Independent Peer Reviews DOE's Systems Integrator convenes independent technical reviews to gauge progress toward meeting specific technical targets and to provide technical information necessary for key decisions. These independent reviews are important to the program: They provide an unbiased understanding of the status of the program's technical targets based on the input of independent technical experts. This understanding is critical to program decision-making, budget

174

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Bharat Bhargava (EPG), Brett Amidan (PNNL), Ken Martin (EPG) Session II: Mark Buckner (ORNL) Session III: Dan Trudnowski (U Montana), Ning Zhou (PNNL) Session IV: Frank Tuffner (PNNL), Bernie Lesieutre (U Wisconsin), Harold Kirkham (PNNL), YC Zhang (NREL) 2013 TR Review - Eastern Interconnection Phase Angle Base Lining Study - Bharat Bhargava, EPG 2013 TR Review - Baselining Studies and Analysis - Brett Amidan, PNNL 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Standards Development and Support - Ken Martin, EPG

175

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Bharat Bhargava (EPG), Brett Amidan (PNNL), Ken Martin (EPG) Session II: Mark Buckner (ORNL) Session III: Dan Trudnowski (U Montana), Ning Zhou (PNNL) Session IV: Frank Tuffner (PNNL), Bernie Lesieutre (U Wisconsin), Harold Kirkham (PNNL), YC Zhang (NREL) 2013 TR Review - Eastern Interconnection Phase Angle Base Lining Study - Bharat Bhargava, EPG 2013 TR Review - Baselining Studies and Analysis - Brett Amidan, PNNL 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Standards Development and Support - Ken Martin, EPG

176

Position paper - peer review and design verification of selected activities  

SciTech Connect

Position Paper to develop and document a position on the performance of independent peer reviews on selected design and analysis components of the Title I (preliminary) and Title II (detailed) design phases of the Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility project.

Stine, M.D.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

177

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Program Overview - Eric Lightner, DOE_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - University of HI Renewable and Distributed Systems - Jay Griffen, Univ. of HI.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Dennis Summer, Fort Collins_0.pdf

178

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Three of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Smart Charger Technology Development, Frank Tuffner, PNNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Vehicle to Grid Demonstration - Willett Kempton, U. Delaware.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Estimating and Mitigating Cascading Failure Risk - Paul Hines, U. Vermont.pdf

179

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel A report for the DOE on the Yucca Mountain Project. Final Report...

180

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion CrackingFatigue Modeling for Light Water Reactor Cooling System Components Working...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Peer Review 2009 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2009 Reviewer: Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General The attached report presents the results of our external...

182

Peer Review Policy | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policy Grants & Contracts Guidance Laboratory Scientific Focus Area...

183

2012 CERTS Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

R&M Review August 7-8, 2012 Cornell University Statler Hotel 130 Statler Drive | Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 257-2500 Day 1: August 7, 2011 The meeting will be held in the Statler Hotel...

184

FINAL REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REPORT REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL FEBRUARY 28, 2002 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. Signature Page Preface Executive Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Organization of the Peer Review 1.2 Objectives of the Review 1.3 Content of the Final Report 2. MAIN FINDINGS 2.1 Perspective 2.2 Overall Findings 2.3 Corrosion Degradation Modes 2.4 Higher or Lower Temperature Operating Modes 2.5 Long-Term Uniform Corrosion of Passive Metal 2.6 Alloy Specification and Comparison 2.7 Technical Issues to be Resolved 2.8 Organizational-Managerial Issues 3. SUMMARY OF DEGRADATION MODES AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Repository Conditions: Overview of Time, Temperature, Environment

185

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on AddThis.com... Publications Program Publications Roadmaps Program Plans Reports to Congress Annual Progress Reports

186

Commercial Lighting Solutions Webtool Peer Review Report, Office Solutions  

SciTech Connect

The Commercial Lighting Solutions (CLS) project directly supports the U.S. Department of Energys Commercial Building Energy Alliance efforts to design high performance buildings. CLS creates energy efficient best practice lighting designs for widespread use, and they are made available to users via an interactive webtool that both educates and guides the end user through the application of the Lighting Solutions. This report summarizes the peer review of the CLS webtool for offices. The methodology for the peer review process included data collection (stakeholder input), analysis of the comments, and organization of the input into categories for prioritization of the comments against a set of criteria. Based on this process, recommendations were developed for the release of version 2.0 of the webtool at the Lightfair conference in Las Vegas in May 2010. The report provides a list of the top ten most significant and relevant improvements that will be made within the webtool for version 2.0 as well as appendices containing the comments and short-term priorities in additional detail. Peer review comments that are considered high priority by the reviewers and the CLS team but cannot be completed for Version 2.0 are listed as long-term recommendations.

Beeson, Tracy A.; Jones, Carol C.

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

187

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 18 -22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia.

Satyapal, S.

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Vulnerability and Instrusion Detection are below.

189

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Vulnerability and Instrusion Detection are below.

190

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Best Practices/Standards Development Best Practices/Standards Development Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practices/Standards Development National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Best Practices/Standards Development are below.

191

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs.

192

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage 8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Develop advanced power electronics for the grid of the future

193

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program 7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Make energy storage ubiquitous ESS Program Makeup ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - BPA ETO based STATCOM Project - ETO Development Project - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - Iowa Stored Energy Project - Electrolyte Research

194

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Practice Design/Configuration Practice Design/Configuration Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practice Design/Configuration National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Best Practice Design/Configuration are below.

195

2005 Conference Proceedings: SECA Core Technology Program Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program Peer Review Program Peer Review October 25-26, 2005 Table of Contents Disclaimer Papers and Presentations Materials Modeling & Simulation Balance of Plant Cell Components Breakout Sections Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government or any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

196

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Ross Guttromson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Na-ion Intercalation Electrodes for Na-ion Battery - Jun Liu, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Carbon Enhanced VRLA Batteries - David Enos, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Improved Properties of Nanocomposites for Flywheel Applications - Tim Boyle, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Magnetic Composites for Flywheel Energy Storage -

197

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Dan Borneo, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA ESS 2012 Peer Review - Life Cycle Testing and Evaluation of Energy Storage Devices - Summer Ferreira, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Test Pad - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance

198

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Tony Martino, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - CAES Geo Performance for Natural Gas and Salt Reservoirs and TMH Response of GSFs - Payton Gardner, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Thermoelectrochemical Energy Storage - Nick Hudak, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Component Research for Redox Flow Batteries - Tom Zawodzinski, ORNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Nitrogen-Oxygen Battery for Large Scale Energy Storage - Frank Delnick, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium-based Battery Development - Dave Ingersoll,

199

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Program Overview - Eric Lightner, DOE_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - University of HI Renewable and Distributed Systems - Jay Griffen, Univ. of HI.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Dennis Summer, Fort Collins_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Integrated & Automated DG Technologies Demo - Roger

200

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Ross Guttromson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Na-ion Intercalation Electrodes for Na-ion Battery - Jun Liu, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Carbon Enhanced VRLA Batteries - David Enos, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Improved Properties of Nanocomposites for Flywheel Applications - Tim Boyle, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Magnetic Composites for Flywheel Energy Storage -

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Day 3, Day 3, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 3, chaired by PNNL's Landis Kannberg, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Membranes for VRFB - Cy Fujimoto, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Materials for Flow Batteries - Travis Anderson, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Redox Flow Battery Prototype Development - Vincent Sprenkle, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Battery

202

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Intelligent Power Infrastructure Consortium - Deepak Divan, Georgia Institute of Technology.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - HI Sustainable Energy Project, Part 1 - Jennifer Stinebaugh, SNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - HI Sustainable Energy Project, Part 2 - Ben Kroposki, NREL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Marin County Renewables, David Cohen, Infotility.pdf

203

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Borrego Springs Microgrid - Tom Bialek, SDG&E.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Demonstration - Craig Gee, Chevron.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Texas Microgrids for Colonias and Renewable Microgrid STEM Education - Dean Schneider, TCAT.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL.pdf

204

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Dan Borneo, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA ESS 2012 Peer Review - Life Cycle Testing and Evaluation of Energy Storage Devices - Summer Ferreira, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Test Pad - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance

205

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Three Morning Presentations Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Three of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Smart Charger Technology Development, Frank Tuffner, PNNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Vehicle to Grid Demonstration - Willett Kempton, U. Delaware.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Estimating and Mitigating Cascading Failure Risk - Paul Hines, U. Vermont.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - GridWise Architecture - Ronald Melton, PNNL.pdf

206

SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE: 2006 TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW  

SciTech Connect

Prompted by a $10 million Congressional allocation to identify supplemental actions to protect the Columbia River from groundwater contamination beneath the Hanford Reservation, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Clean-up Technology identified twenty-three potential technical projects and then down-selected ten of these for further evaluation. An independent expert peer review was conducted for the ten down-selected proposals. The review panel consisted of twenty-three recognized subject matter experts that broadly represented academia, industry, and federal laboratories. Of the initial ten proposals reviewed, one was given unconditional support, six were given conditional support, and three were not supported as proposed. Three additional proposals were then submitted by DOE for review--these proposals were structured, in part, to respond to the initial round of technical peer review comments. Peer reviews of these additional proposals provided conditional support. For those proposals that received conditional support, DOE requested specific implementation and work plans and assessed whether the plans adequately addressed the technical conditions identified by the review panel. The final list of technology proposals receiving support, or conditional support, primarily focused on understanding and reducing the potential impacts of uranium, chromium, and strontium from facilities adjacent to the Columbia River, with a secondary focus on understanding and limiting the future Columbia River impacts from the large carbon tetrachloride groundwater plume underlying and downgradient of the Hanford Central Plateau facilities. The results and recommendations of the peer reviews informed the final DOE project selections and supported implementation of the selected projects to protect the Columbia River and address groundwater contamination at Hanford.

Looney, B; Dawn Kaback; Gene Leboeuf; Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz; Lynn Lefkoff

2006-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

207

External Peer Review Team Report Underground Testing Area Subproject for Frenchman Flat, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

An external peer review was conducted to review the groundwater models used in the corrective action investigation stage of the Underground Test Area (UGTA) subproject to forecast zones of potential contamination in 1,000 years for the Frenchman Flat area. The goal of the external peer review was to provide technical evaluation of the studies and to assist in assessing the readiness of the UGTA subproject to progress to monitoring activities for further model evaluation. The external peer review team consisted of six independent technical experts with expertise in geology, hydrogeology,'''groundwater modeling, and radiochemistry. The peer review team was tasked with addressing the following questions: 1. Are the modeling approaches, assumptions, and model results for Frenchman Flat consistent with the use of modeling studies as a decision tool for resolution of environmental and regulatory requirements? 2. Do the modeling results adequately account for uncertainty in models of flow and transport in the Frenchman Flat hydrological setting? a. Are the models of sufficient scale/resolution to adequately predict contaminant transport in the Frenchman Flat setting? b. Have all key processes been included in the model? c. Are the methods used to forecast contaminant boundaries from the transport modeling studies reasonable and appropriate? d. Are the assessments of uncertainty technically sound and consistent with state-of-the-art approaches currently used in the hydrological sciences? 3. Are the datasets and modeling results adequate for a transition to Corrective Action Unit monitoring studiesthe next stage in the UGTA strategy for Frenchman Flat? The peer review team is of the opinion that, with some limitations, the modeling approaches, assumptions, and model results are consistent with the use of modeling studies for resolution of environmental and regulatory requirements. The peer review team further finds that the modeling studies have accounted for uncertainty in models of flow and transport in the Frenchman Flat except for a few deficiencies described in the report. Finally, the peer review team concludes that the UGTA subproject has explored a wide range of variations in assumptions, methods, and data, and should proceed to the next stage with an emphasis on monitoring studies. The corrective action strategy, as described in the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, states that the groundwater flow and transport models for each corrective action unit will consider, at a minimum, the following: Alternative hydrostratigraphic framework models of the modeling domain. Uncertainty in the radiological and hydrological source terms. Alternative models of recharge. Alternative boundary conditions and groundwater flows. Multiple permissive sets of calibrated flow models. Probabilistic simulations of transport using plausible sets of alternative framework and recharge models, and boundary and groundwater flows from calibrated flow models. Ensembles of forecasts of contaminant boundaries. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of model outputs. The peer review team finds that these minimum requirements have been met. While the groundwater modeling and uncertainty analyses have been quite detailed, the peer review team has identified several modeling-related issues that should be addressed in the next phase of the corrective action activities: Evaluating and using water-level gradients from the pilot wells at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site in model calibration. Re-evaluating the use of geochemical age-dating data to constrain model calibrations. Developing water budgets for the alluvial and upper volcanic aquifer systems in Frenchman Flat. Considering modeling approaches in which calculated groundwater flow directions near the water table are not predetermined by model boundary conditions and areas of recharge, all of which are very uncertain. Evaluating local-scale variations in hydraulic conductivity on the calculated contaminant boundaries. Evaluat

Sam Marutzky

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t L e s s d e p e n d e n c e o n f o r e i g n o i l t o d a y, a n d t r a n s i t i o n t o a p e t r o l e u m - f r e e , e m i s s i o n s - f r e e v e h i c l e t o m o r r o w . F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m Heavy veHicle SyStemS OptimizatiOn merit review and peer evaluatiOn Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2006 Department of Energy (DOE) Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Peer Review Meeting, held April 18-20, 2006 at Argonne National Laboratory in suburban Chicago, Illinois. The goal of this document is to provide the reader with a summary of the comments and scores from expert reviewers from industry and government on these systems optimization projects.

209

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The afternoon presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Interoperability of Demand Response Resources in NY - John Giacona, Con Edison.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Integrated Distribution Management System in AL - Joe Schatz, SCS.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Yahia Baghzouz, UNLV.pdf

210

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission August 15, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM revamped and expanded peer reviews for its contracts and projects in the past year with a goal of improving performance and delivering results in the world's largest nuclear cleanup

211

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Stan Attcity, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel High Energy Density Dielectrics for Scalable Capacitor Needs - Geoff Brennecka, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Low Cost, Manufacturable High Voltage Power Module for ESS - Brandon Passmore, APEI ESS 2012 Peer Review - 6.5 kV Silicon Carbide Half-Bridge Power Switch Module for ESS Applications - John Hostetler, United Silicon Carbide ESS 2012 Peer Review - 15 kV Phase Leg Power Modules with SiC Devices -

212

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 1, chaired by Bill Capp of Grid Storage Consulting, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Solution for Smart Grid Renewable Energy Applications - Sheri Nevins, Raytheon & Ron Moss, EnerVault ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Controls for Grid Stability - Ray Byrne, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Secondary Use of Vehicle Batteries in Power Systems

213

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 1, chaired by NETL's Ron Staubly, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wind Firming EnergyFarm - Tom Stepien, Primus Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Grid-Scale Energy Storage Demo for Ancillary Services Using UltraBattery - John Wood, Ecoult ESS 2012 Peer Review - PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting - Steve Willard, PNM ESS 2012 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Sodium Ion Battery for Grid Level Applications - Ted Wiley, Aquion Energy

214

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission August 15, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM revamped and expanded peer reviews for its contracts and projects in the past year with a goal of improving performance and delivering results in the world's largest nuclear cleanup

215

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 1, Session 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 1, chaired by Bill Capp of Grid Storage Consulting, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Solution for Smart Grid Renewable Energy Applications - Sheri Nevins, Raytheon & Ron Moss, EnerVault ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Controls for Grid Stability - Ray Byrne, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Secondary Use of Vehicle Batteries in Power Systems

216

SRS Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review, July 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SRS-2011-07-15 SRS-2011-07-15 Site: Savannah River Site, NA-26 Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review Dates of Activity : 07/12/2011 - 07/15/2011 Report Preparer: James Lockridge Activity Description/Purpose: At the request of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Enterprise Project Management (NA- APM-20), the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), provided an expert to review the Waste Solidification Building (WSB) startup programs and procedures associated with worker safety and health, environment, and security. Criteria for the review was detailed in the Criteria,

217

Peer Review Policies | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Peer Review Policies Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity...

218

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 28, 2012.

219

Peer Merit / Review Policies | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

220

Peer Review of NRC Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) Models underwent a Peer Review using ASME PRA standard (Addendum C) as endorsed by NRC in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200. The review was performed by a mix of industry probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) experts and NRC PRA experts. Representative SPAR models, one PWR and one BWR, were reviewed against Capability Category I of the ASME PRA standard. Capability Category I was selected as the basis for review due to the specific uses/applications of the SPAR models. The BWR SPAR model was reviewed against 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements; however, based on the Capability Category I level of review and the absence of internal flooding and containment performance (LERF) logic only 216 requirements were determined to be applicable. Based on the review, the BWR SPAR model met 139 of the 216 supporting requirements. The review also generated 200 findings or suggestions. Of these 200 findings and suggestions 142 were findings and 58 were suggestions. The PWR SPAR model was also evaluated against the same 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements. Of these requirements only 215 were deemed appropriate for the review (for the same reason as noted for the BWR). The PWR review determined that 125 of the 215 supporting requirements met Capability Category I or greater. The review identified 101 findings or suggestions (76 findings and 25 suggestions). These findings or suggestions were developed to identify areas where SPAR models could be enhanced. A process to prioritize and incorporate the findings/suggestions supporting requirements into the SPAR models is being developed. The prioritization process focuses on those findings that will enhance the accuracy, completeness and usability of the SPAR models.

Anthony Koonce; James Knudsen; Robert Buell

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

An external peer review of the U.S. Department of Energy`s assessment of ``damages and benefits of the fuel cycles: Estimation methods, impacts, and values``. Final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The need for better assessments of the ``external`` benefits and costs of environmental effects of various fuel cycles was identified during the development of the National Energy Strategy. The growing importance of this issue was emphasized by US Department of Energy (DOE) management because over half of the states were already pursuing some form of social costing in electricity regulation and a well-established technical basis for such decisions was lacking. This issue was identified as a major area of controversy--both scientifically and politically--in developing energy policies at the state and national level. In 1989, the DOE`s Office of Domestic and International Energy Policy commissioned a study of the external environmental damages and benefits of the major fuel cycles involved in electric power generation. Over the next 3-year period, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Resources for the Future conducted the study and produced a series of documents (fuel cycle documents) evaluating the costs of environmental damages of the coal, oil, natural gas, biomass, hydroelectric, and nuclear fuel cycles, as well as the Background Document on methodological issues. These documents described work that took almost 3 years and $2.5 million to complete and whose implications could be far reaching. In 1992, the Secretary of Energy sought advice on the overall concepts underlying the studies and the means employed to estimate environmental externalities. He asked the Secretary of Energy`s Advisory Board to undertake a peer review of the fuel cycle studies and encouraged the Board to turn to outside expertise, as needed.

Not Available

1993-08-09T23:59:59.000Z

222

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2010 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held June 7-11, 2010 in Washington, D.C.

Not Available

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

223

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Flow Battery Membrane Flow Battery Membrane Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012 Jack Treger treger.jack@tiaxllc.com Washington DC, September 27, 2012 Flow Battery Membrane Background and Purpose 1 Vanadium redox batteries (VRB) for energy storage require improved ion- selective membranes. * Vanadium permeation across current membranes leads to self-discharge and decreases cycling efficiency: - Negative half cell: V 2+ V 3+ + e - E o = -0.255V - Positive half cell: e - + VO 2 + + 2H + VO 2+ + H 2 O E o = 1.00V . * Current perfluorosulfonic acid polymer membranes are costly. * TIAX is developing a novel composite bipolar membrane: - Composite anionic membrane minimizes content of costly perfluorosulfonic acid polymer - Made bipolar by a cationic surface layer to improve selectivity for

224

FY2002 ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS PEER REVIEW AGENDA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM ANNUAL PEER REVIEW November 2-3, 2006 Washington Marriott Hotel, Washington, DC (USA) AGENDA Thursday, November 2, 2004 7:45 AM Continental Breakfast 8:30 Welcome and Overview - Dr. Imre Gyuk, DOE 8:40 DOE Perspective - DOE 9:00 ESS Program Overview - John Boyes, Sandia National Laboratories 9:20 NAS Battery Performance at Charleston, WV - Ali Nourai, AEP Corp. (Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy (DOE/ESS) through Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). 9:40 Evaluation of the Kauai Island Utility Co-operative System for Energy storage Potential - Abbas Akhil, Sandia National Laboratories (Funded by the Kauai Island Utility Co-0p). 10:00 Iowa Stored Energy Plant - Bob Haug, Iowa Stored Energy Plant Agency

225

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program 6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - HybSim Hybrid Storage Model Development Congressionally-Directed Programs - University of Missouri-Rolla - Grid Modernization - Iowa Stored Energy Project - EEI - BiPolar Ni-MH Battery Development - Sprint - Storage for Telecommunications Apps. - Emerson - Network Power - Beacon Power - Frequency Regulation Plant Design - Mead Westvaco - Research on Lead-Carbon Asymmetric Super capacitors (FY05) ESS Program Makeup (cont.) ESS Program Makeup cont. SBIR - Aegis Technology - PII - Arkansas Power Electronic International -

226

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage 9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Significant Events in FY09 Power Electronics Subprogram suffered a large budget cut in FY09 and was dropped as a separate program for FY10. ESSP will reabsorb power electronics development for energy storage applications back into program. Funding Due to a lengthy Congressional continuing resolution, FY09 funding was not received until April Power Electronics Sub-Program ESSP Program Highlights

227

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Flow Battery Modeling Energy Storage Systems Peer Review September 26-28, 2012 MJ Martinez (PI), J Clausen, SM Davison, HK Moffat Flow Battery Modeling Schematic of a Flow Battery PURPOSE: The flow battery modeling task seeks to improve fundamental understanding and enable high-performing, low-cost designs of flow batteries through

228

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Smart Grid Panel  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Panel Smart Grid Panel Discussion 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Smart Grid Panel Discussion The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the Day 2 Smart Grid panel discussion are below. Moderator: Lee Kreval, SDG&E 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Puesh Kumar, American Public Power Association 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Rogelio Sullivan, NC State University 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Matt Wakefield, EPRI More Documents & Publications Smart Grid Characteristics, Values, and Metrics

229

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 First Afternoon Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

First Afternoon First Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 First Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the first Day 2 afternoon session are below. Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LIPA Smart Energy Corridor Project - Ming Mui, LIPA 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Enhanced Demand and Distribution Management Regional Demonstration - Craig Miller, NRECA 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: NSTAR Automated Mater Reading Based Dynamic Pricing - Douglas Horton, NSTAR Electric & Gas

230

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Second Afternoon Session  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Afternoon Second Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Second Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the second Day 2 afternoon session are below. Moderator: Eric Lightner, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Bill Becker, Spirae 2012 SG Peer Review - Interoperability of Demand Response Resources in New York - Andre Wellington, ConEd NY 2012 SG Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Robert Boehm, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas

231

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

232

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. The agenda & project list is below. Presentations Energy Storage Systems (ESS) presentations Power Electronics (PE) Systems presentations

234

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Peer Merit / Review Policies Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page

235

2012 SG Peer Review - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review Meeting DOE - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project S. S. (Mani) Venkata Alstom Grid June 7, 2012 December 2008 DOE Integrated Smart...

236

2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations 3 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available September 9, 2013 - 3:25pm Addthis The agendas and presentations from the June and August 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Program reviews are now available for download. The June 27-28 Transmission Reliability Program review combined the North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) and Advanced Application Development subprograms. The 2-day review included an overview of the program and six sessions of presentations from researchers funded by OE. The NASPI working group addresses the installation of synchrophasor networks across the United States with Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grant funds. Advanced Application Development projects include

237

Heavy Vehicle Materials Program 2005 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT HEAVY VEHICLE MATERIALS PROGRAM Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 2005 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Heavy Vehicle Materials Program Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, held September 13-15, 2005 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The goal of this document is to provide the reader with a summary of the comments and scores from expert reviewers from industry and government on these Materials Technologies projects.

238

Responsible Authorship and Peer Review James R. Wilson  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of cold fusion is a striking illustration of what happens when scientists circumvent the normal peer and resources to show that there is no convincing evidence for room-temperature fusion. Much of this effort would not have been necessary had normal scientific procedures been followed. --John R. Huizenga, Cold

239

Full Economic Costing:-Updated guidance notes for peer reviewers  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the level of resources required to undertake the project and not their unit cost. In particular, peer are as follows: 1) Directly Incurred costs: These are costs which are specific to a project and will be charged to the project on the basis of actual costs incurred. They must be supported by an audit record, which

240

2012 CERTS Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

R&M Review R&M Review August 7-8, 2012 Cornell University Statler Hotel 130 Statler Drive | Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 257-2500 Day 1: August 7, 2011 The meeting will be held in the Statler Hotel (Yale/Princeton conference rooms) 8:30 Continental Breakfast (Conference Foyer 2) 9:00 Introductions and overview - Bob Thomas 9:15 DOE Vision/Priorities/Future Directions - Phil Overholt 9:30 #1: Transmission Investment Assessment under Uncertainty About Fuel Prices, Technology, Renewables Penetration and Market Responses Using a Multi-Stage Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse Ben Hobbs, Dick Schuler, Francisco Munoz 10:15 #2: Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch And Distributed Resource Aggregation Pravin Varaiya, Felix Wu, K. Poolla, Anand Subramanian

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Microsoft Word - ASME FY08 Fuel Cell Peer Review Report_FINAL.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Meeting Host Organization Technology & Management Services, Inc. Steven T. Ostheim (412) 386-6485 Review Panel AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Minking K. Chyu, Chair, Peer Review Panel Richard Laudenat, Chair, Peer Review Executive Committee Michael Tinkleman, Director, Research ASME Center for Research and Technology Development (202) 785-7394 Meeting Facilitator and Final Report Ross Brindle, Energetics Incorporated (410) 953-6239 Work Done Under Prime Contract Number DE-AC26-05NT41816 (Subtask 305.01.02.3) FINAL REPORT 2008 STRATEGIC CENTER FOR COAL FUEL CELL PROGRAM PEER REVIEW MEETING Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania April 21-25, 2008 MEETING SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT José D. Figueroa NETL Project Manager and Meeting Coordinator

242

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

244

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

246

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy-Efficient Product Procurement (EEPP) Portfolio Meeting: Washington D.C., Dec. 4, 2012 Reviewers: David Goldstein (Chair), Harvey Sachs, Cyndi Vallina, Marina Moses, and Shahzeen Attari Review: Jan. 25, 2013 Summary The Review Committee met in Washington, D.C., and engaged in a day-long discussion with FEMP EEPP staff and contractors. Program staff gave clear and effective presentations, and we had extensive and illuminating discussions with the staff, and to a limited extent with other interested parties who attended. The Committee worked together after the meeting and by email to produce this review. Our review addresses: * strategic issues with respect to the program,

247

2012 SG Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed g Joe Eto Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 7 June 2012 The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed Objective To lower the cost and improve the performance of clusters of smaller distributed energy resources and loads when operated in an integrated manner when operated in an integrated manner, i.e., as microgrids Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) Prior to FY12, FY13, Out-year(s) Technical Scope The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed is being expanded through the addition of new hardware elements: 1) a CERTS- compatible conventional synchronous generator ; 2) an FY 12 , authorized , requested y ( ) 2500K 1000K 1000K 2500K energy management system relying on software as a service (SaaS) for dispatch; 3) a commercially available, stand-alone

248

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ardalan Kemiab, Southern California Edison  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) ( ) Ed Kamiab Southern California Edison (SCE) 6/8/2012 ISGD Objective SCE' I i S t G id D t ti (ISGD) ill (Insert graphic here) SCE's Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) will demonstrate an integrated, scalable Smart Grid system that includes many of the interlocking pieces of an end- to-end Smart Grid system, from the transmission and distrib tion s stems to cons mer applications s ch as distribution systems to consumer applications such as smart appliances and plug-in electric vehicles. Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY2010 FY2015 1. Energy Smart Customer Devices 2 Year 2020 Distribution System Technical Scope FY2010 - FY2015 $39,612 2. Year 2020 Distribution System 3. Interoperability & Cyber Security 4. Workforce of the Future

249

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2011 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 9-13, 2011 in Arlington, Virginia

Satypal, S.

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

Advanced Combustion Engine Program 2005 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle ADVANCED COMBUSTION ENGINE PROGRAM F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 5, 2005 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on April 19-21, 2005 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were provided (with reviewers' names deleted) to the presenters in early June and were used by national laboratory researchers in the development of Annual Operating Plans (AOPs) for fiscal year (FY) 2006. The panel's

251

Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 May 10, 2012 - 11:53am Addthis The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability will hold its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects will be presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. A draft agenda and online registration are available. In conjunction with the peer review, the Smart Grid R&D Program will hold a discussion forum for principle investigators of current projects and select smart grid experts on June 6, 2012. Input on current capabilities and gap areas in need of future R&D will be used to update the Multi-Year Program Plan.

252

ForPeerReview Microbiology and performance of a methanogenic biofilm reactor during the1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: Biofilm, Anaerobic digestion, Bioreactor start-up, Microbial population21 dynamics, Methanogenesis-00615442,version1-19Aug2011 #12;ForPeerReview 3 Introduction1 Anaerobic digestion is an effective method). The limitation of4 anaerobic digestion processes resides in the duration and instability of their transitory

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

253

The convergence of digital libraries and the peer-review process  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Pre-print repositories have seen a significant increase in use over the past fifteen years across multiple research domains. Researchers are beginning to develop applications capable of using these repositories to assist the scientific community above ... Keywords: OAI-PMH, Open Archives Initiative, peer-review process, pre-print repositories

Marko A. Rodriguez; Johan Bollen; Herbert Van De Sompel

2006-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

PEER-REVIEW Detection Of Lateral Non-Uniformities In Fluidized Bed Combustors  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, greatly influences solid circulation patterns and gas phase mixing which inturn affects various in-bed by Dent etal!! in a Fludized bed combustor. For a vertically rising bubble midway through the two sensorsPEER-REVIEW Detection Of Lateral Non-Uniformities In Fluidized Bed Combustors .. A. Venkata Ramayya

Columbia University

255

MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 1 M. J. Gouge  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, and for plasma discharge termination on demand. #12;MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 3 · Gas fueling prototype testing ­ response time experiments for impurity gas puffing into divertor · Pellet fueling development ­ world/s (deuterium) ­ pellet feed/rotor dynamics for centrifuge injector (with CEA) ­ piston and screw extruder

256

Technical/Peer Review Draft May 2006 PART II OVERVIEW1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Technical/Peer Review Draft May 2006 II-1 PART II OVERVIEW1 2 Energy, Industry, and Waste Fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) are used primarily for their concentration of chemical energy is identified as emissions from energy and emissions from industrial21 processes.22 23 Emissions by Month and

257

ORISE: Enhancing Peer Review Tools and Services to Support DOE...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to specific presentations prior to the five-day U.S. Department of Energy's Hydrogen Fuel Cells and Vehicle Technologies annual program evaluation and review-the largest for...

258

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Summary: Transmission Investment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty about Fuel Prices, Technology, Renewables Penetration and Market Responses using a Multi-Stage Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse (Year...

259

2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Matt Wakefield...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Field Crews, AMI, DA, CVR, Substation, Restoration * EPRI services related to the FAN - Planning and estimating network deployment - New technology assessment - Collaborate:...

260

ORISE: Coordinating Scientific Peer Reviews to Advance Energy Efficiency  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Efficiency Energy Efficiency ORISE Reviews and Evaluates Technologies that Advance Energy Efficiency ORISE Reviews and Evaluates Technologies that Advance Energy Efficiency In addition to renewable energy and changes in individual behavior, energy efficiency is generally achieved through the development of more efficient technologies. Buildings are being constructed with more energy efficient systems, fluorescent light bulbs are replacing incandescent lights, and new vehicle technologies are enabling America to use less petroleum. The Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE) realizes that energy efficiency encompasses a wide spectrum of industries and supports the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in its mission to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Puesh Kumar, American Public Power Association  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 San Diego, CA Puesh M. Kumar Director of Engineering & Operations Public Power and APPA * Public power: operated by local governments; reliable, responsive, not-for-profit * 2,000 community-owned electric utilities, 46 million people * Non-profit, non-partisan organization, est. 1940 - Public policy interests - Member services - Reliable electricity at reasonable prices - Proper protection of the environment Public Power in the US 63 648 384 340 308 133 80 30 22 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Less than 10 11 to 1,000 1,001 to 2,000 2,001 to 4000 4,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 20,000 20,001 to 40,000 40,001 - 100,000 More than 100,000 Customers Ser ved Public Power by Number of Customers Served DEED * Demonstration of Energy Efficient Developments * Created in 1980

262

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review and Update Meeting | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Update Meeting and Update Meeting Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review and Update Meeting The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions; the agenda is available below. Presentations are available through the individual session links. Presentations Day 1 Session 1: Chaired by Imre Gyuk, DOE Session 2: Chaired by Ron Staubly, NETL Session 3: Chaired by Bill Capp, Grid Storage Consulting Poster Session: National Lab Projects | ARPA-E Projects Day 2 Session 1: Chaired by Tony Martino, SNL Session 2: Chaired by Ross Guttromson, SNL Session 3: Chaired by Stan Atcitty, SNL Poster Session: SBIR Projects | University Projects | ARRA Projects

263

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report (Book)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The fiscal year (FY) 2013 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), in conjunction with DOE's Vehicle Technologies Office AMR, was held from May 13-16, 2013, at the Crystal City Marriott and Crystal Gateway Marriott in Arlington, Virginia. This report is a summary of comments by AMR peer reviewers about the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE).

Not Available

2013-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

264

Multiple peer-assessment modes to augment online student question-generation processes  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In view of the current theoretical and empirical support for a student-generated questions approach to learning along with the advantageous features of network technology, several online student question-generation learning systems with a peer-assessment ... Keywords: Applications in subject areas, Computer-mediated communication, Cooperative/collaborative learning, Teaching/learning strategies

Fu-Yun Yu

2011-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

265

Advanced Combustion, Emission Control, Health Impacts, and Fuels Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06 06 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t L e s s d e p e n d e n c e o n f o r e i g n o i l t o d a y, a n d t r a n s i t i o n t o a p e t r o l e u m - f r e e , e m i s s i o n s - f r e e v e h i c l e t o m o r r o w . F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m AdvAnced combustion, emission controls, HeAltH impActs, And Fuels merit review And peer evAluAtion Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 2006 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2006 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion, Emission Controls, Health Impacts, and Fuels Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 15-18, 2006 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were provided (with reviewers' names deleted) to the presenters in early June and were used by national laboratory

266

Radioactive Waste Isolation in Salt: Peer review of documents dealing with geophysical investigations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Salt Repository Project, a US Department of Energy program to develop a mined repository in salt for high-level radioactive waste, is governed by a complex and sometimes inconsistent array of laws, administrative regulations, guidelines, and position papers. In conducting multidisciplinary peer reviews of contractor documents in support of this project, Argonne National Laboratory has needed to inform its expert reviewers of these governmental mandates, with particular emphasis on the relationship between issues and the technical work undertaken. This report acquaints peer review panelists with the regulatory framework as it affects their reviews of site characterization plans and related documents, including surface-based and underground test plans. Panelists will be asked to consider repository performance objectives and issues as they judge the adequacy of proposed geophysical testing. All site-specific discussions relate to the Deaf Smith County site in Texas, which was approved for site characterization by the President in May 1986. Natural processes active at the Deaf Smith County site and the status of geophysical testing near the site are reviewed briefly. 25 refs., 4 figs., 5 tabs.

McGinnis, L.D.; Bowen, R.H.

1987-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

PEER REVIEWED  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

restaurant initiative to increase availability of healthy menu options in Somerville, Massachusetts:

unknown authors

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Second Generation Emissions Study - Rick Fioravanti, DNV KEMA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

number 2012 DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review Second Generation Emissions Study Washington, DC September 26 - 28, 2012 Original KEMA Study on Emission Benefits  Study was conducted in 2007 and compared a flywheel to traditional technologies - Study highlights - Showed emission savings from utilization of storage - Study provided a simple "snapshot" of potential trends - Compared a flywheel to natural gas, coal, and pumped hydro systems - Methodology "vetted" at 2007 EESAT Conference - Next steps called for a "deeper dive into actual performance numbers - Actual simulations of specific ISO  Today, study is still cited as the main "Emission " Study for such applications - Results referenced in many cases as a secondary benefit of storage systems

269

2010 DOE Peer Review Update Conference LIST OF ATTENDEES Last Name First Name Organization Country  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2/2010 2/2010 1 2010 DOE Peer Review Update Conference LIST OF ATTENDEES Last Name First Name Organization Country Aalmans Luc General Compression USA Adams Michael Constellation Energy USA Agar Ertan Drexel University USA Agrawal Poonum Sentech, Inc USA Ahmed Jasim BOSCH USA Akhil Abbas Sandia National Laboratories USA Alexander Iwan Case Western Reserve University USA Alexander Jane USA Amy Fabrice Air Products USA Anderson Dianne Case Western Reserve University USA Anderson Travis Sandia National Laboratories USA Andrews George Oak Ridge National Laboratory USA Arseneaux James Beacon Power Corporation USA Aselage Terrence Sandia National Laboratories USA Asgeirsson Haukur DTE Energy USA Atcitty Stan Sandia National Laboratories USA

270

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Amber Kinetics Flywheel Energy Storage Demo - Ed Chiao, Amber Kinetics  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

amber_kinetics amber_kinetics DOE Peer Review September 2012 Ed Chiao, CEO amber_kinetics Amber Kinetics: Our Flywheel History Start-up launched in 2009, Stanford University Cleantech Entrepreneurship class Established a technology licensing & flywheel development partnership with LLNL; Amber Kinetics identified new material & lower-cost rotor designs for commercialization Awarded a Smart Grid Energy Storage Demonstration grant award for flywheels Awarded a matching grant for development & demonstration of flywheel technology Stanford University Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy California Energy Commission World-class institutions | innovative, deep flywheel technology owned by Amber Amber Kinetics, Inc. - Confidential and Proprietary, All Rights Reserved

271

Microsoft Word - A-14-09-29169 Final DOE Peer Review Ltr.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION BALTIMORE, MD 21235-0001 March 5, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HONORABLE GREGORY H. FRIEDMAN INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SUBJECT: Department of Energy Peer Review for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2009 The attached report presents the results of our external quality control review of the Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General, Office of Audit Services. Your response to the draft report is included as Appendix B. We thank you and your staff for the assistance and cooperation provided during our review. If you have any questions or would like to discuss the report, please call me, or have your staff contact Steven L. Schaeffer, Assistant Inspector General for Audit, at

272

APPENDIX: TUNED MODELS OF PEER ASSESSMENT IN MOOCS CHRIS PIECH, JONATHAN HUANG, ZHENGHAO CHEN,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

in our paper. 1. Gibbs sampling for Model PG1 Model PG1 is given as follows: (Reliability) v G(0, 0APPENDIX: TUNED MODELS OF PEER ASSESSMENT IN MOOCS CHRIS PIECH, JONATHAN HUANG, ZHENGHAO CHEN: P(Z|{su}uU ,{bv}vG, {v}vG) = u P(su|µ0, 0) · v P(bv|0) · P(v|0, 0) zv u P(zv u|su, bv, v

Pratt, Vaughan

273

SECA CTP Peer Review Oct. 25-26, 2003 Review Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Components 11 * Modeling 3 * Balance of Plant 2 Topical Area Reviewed 0 20 40 60 80 Percentage Materials & Cell Components Modeling Balance of Plant Review Results Materials &...

274

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: NSTAR Automated Mater Reading Based Dynamic Pricing - Douglas Horton, NSTAR Electric & Gas  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting AMR Based Dynamic Pricing y g Doug Horton NSTAR Electric & Gas Co. 6/8/2012 AMR Based Dynamic Pricing Objective Provide two-way communication of electricity cost & consumption data utilizing the customers existing meter & Internet. Goal to achieve 5% reduction in peak and Goal to achieve 5% reduction in peak and average load. Life-cycle Funding ($K) Total Budget Total DOE Funding to Technical Scope Use customer's existing AMR meter and broadband Internet to achieve two way Total Budget Total DOE Funding Funding to Date $4,900k $2,362k $1,623k broadband Internet to achieve two way communication and "AMI" functionality Cutting-edge solution to integrate: * Existing meters E i ti I t t December 2008 * Existing Internet * Existing billing & CIS

275

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report: May 14-18, 2012, Arlington, VA  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the fiscal year (FY) 2012 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 14-18, 2012, in Arlington, VA.

Not Available

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC - Tom Rizy, ORNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

g g Peer Review Meeting Smart Inverter Controls & Microgrid Interoperation at the Distributed Energy Communications & Controls (DECC) Lab ( ) D. Tom Rizy Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) June 7 th 2012 June 7 th , 2012 Smart Inverter (SI) Controls and Microgrid (MG) Interoperation Microgrid (MG) Interoperation Objectives * D l d SI l f l i l DECC Microgrid * Develop and test SI controls for multiple renewable/nonrenewable DER. * Develop MG controls and communication requirements for high penetration DER. * I l t MG t DECC L b Technical Scope * Implement MG at DECC Lab. * Transfer technology to industry. Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) Prior to FY12 FY13 Out- Technical Scope * Develop advanced smart inverter control consisting of local droop (P-f, Q-V) control integrated with secondary closed

277

Presentation-SNL_RICA-CEDS_Peer_Review_v2a.pptx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems Systems 2010 Peer Review Alexandria, VA July 20-22, 2010 Co-PI: Jason Stamp, Ph.D. Co-PI: Laurie Phillips Sandia National Laboratories Reliability Impacts for Cyber Attack (RICA) Summary Slide: Reliability Impacts for Cyber Attack (RICA) Outcomes:
Quan&ta&ve
impact
analysis of
cyber
a5acks
against
power
grid control
systems
(that
affect
grid
topology and
opera&ons),
including
poten&al mi&ga&on
steps,
using
reliability
metrics. Analyze
large-scale
cases
using
simula&on soCware
in
a
High-Performance Compu&ng
(HPC)
environment. Roadmap
Challenges:
Develop
evidence- based
business
case
to
increase
and shape
investment
in
control
system security.

278

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LIPA Smart Energy Corridor Project - Ming Mui, LIPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting DE-OE0000220 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Ming Mui and Sunil Katwala June 8, 2012 December 2008 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) Fiscal Years 2010 to 2015 DOE Funding $ 12,496K Total Project Cost $ 25,293K* Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) * Additional funding from LIPA and SUNY Research Foundation Smart Energy Corridor will: (1) Validate Smart Grid technologies; (2) Quantify Smart Grid costs and benefits; (3) Validate Smart Grid applications at a scale that can be readily adapted and replicated in individual homes and businesses. * Demonstrate Technolgy (DA, Sub Auto, AMI, DLC) * Marketing (TOU Rates, Webtools, Visualization) * Cyber Security (Vulneribility Testing & Hardening)

279

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance for ESS - Vilayanur Viswanathan, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance for Energy Storage Systems D. Conover, V. Viswanathan, K. Bray and M. Kintner-Meyer (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) D. Schoenwald, D. Rose, and S. Ferreira (Sandia National Laboratory) September 28, 2012 USDOE-OE ESS Peer Review Washington, DC Dr. Imre Gyuk - Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Problem Statement The energy storage market is expanding, with a variety of storage technologies available The lack of a uniform way to evaluate energy storage system (ESS) performance is causing confusion in the market Without an accepted basis for comparing ESS performance, the application and use of storage technology will be hampered

280

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Nitrogen-Oxygen Battery for Large Scale Energy Storage - Frank Delnick, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program Peer Review, Washington, DC Sept. 26-28, 2012 Frank Delnick, David Ingersoll, Karen Waldrip, Peter Feibelman Nitrogen/Oxygen Battery A Transformational Architecture for Large Scale Energy Storage Power Sources Technology Group Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM SAND2012-7881P N 2 /O 2 Battery Project Overview  Air/Air battery.  N 2 electrochemistry enables the redefinition of a gas (diffusion) electrode and the three phase interface.  Operated as redox flow battery.  Provide a very high energy density, very low cost, environmentally benign electrochemical platform for load leveling and for grid-integrated storage of energy generated by wind, solar and other sustainable but intermittent sources.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium Intercalation Battery for Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012 David Ofer Ofer.david@tiaxllc.com Washington DC, September 27, 2012 Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Background and Purpose 2 Large-scale stationary energy storage for integration with renewables and for off-peak energy capture is a new application requiring new rechargeable batteries. * New combination of requirements - Long cycle life under deep cycling use profile - High cycling efficiency - Moderate rate capability - Very low cost - No requirement for particularly high specific energy or energy density * TIAX is developing a novel Na-ion battery - Leverages teachings of Li-ion technology - Targets novel low-cost chemistry and cell design

282

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Photos placed in Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project September 28, 2012 Jim Ellison, Verne Loose, Ray Byrne, Cesar Silva Monroy, and Ryan Elliott Sandia National Laboratories Leigh Tesfatsion Iowa State University DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review 2012 Introduction - Motivation for a New Market Design  Need to eliminate market bias of resource classes such as Energy Storage  Need to accommodate new technologies, without the need to change market rules  Move away from resource-centric markets toward service-centric markets

283

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium-based Battery Development - Dave Ingersoll, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium-based Battery Development Sodium-based Battery Development A Family of Batteries for Large Scale Energy Storage D. Ingersoll, C. Apblett, E. Spoerke, K. Zavadil, R. Cygan, J. Ihlefeld, F. Delnick, & T. Anderson Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM Prof. E. Wachsman University of Maryland, College Park, MD Profs. R. Kee & J. Porter, Dr. H. Zhu Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO S. Bhavaraju & M. Robins Ceramatec, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT D. Beeaff CoorsTek, Inc, Golden, CO J. Martin Boulder Ionics, Golden CO US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program Peer Review, Washington, DC, Sept. 26-28, 2012 Sodium-based batteries  Purpose  Demonstrate a family of sodium-based battery chemistries  sodium-iodine, sodium-bromine, sodium-air, sodium insertion, sodium-metal, etc

284

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wind Firming EnergyFarm - Tom Stepien, Primus Power  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wind Firming EnergyFarm DOE Peer Review September 26, 2012 2 Primus Power is on track to deliver EnergyPods TM to California's Modesto Irrigation District starting 2014 EnergyPod TM 250 kW  1 MWh PowerBox Supports 8 EnergyPods TM 3 How will storage integrate into Modesto's system? Modesto's daily load ? Storage Hydro Coal & Gas Wind Solar 4 Modesto's 25 MW McHenry solar farm 5 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and solar energy 25 MW McHenry Solar Farm 6 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and solar energy 25 MW McHenry Solar Farm 8.7 MW up in 15 min 15 MW down in 15 min 4-Aug-12 7 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and

285

CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Iowa Stored Energy Park DOE Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review Fairmont Hotel Washington, DC September 29, 2008 Kent Holst, Development Director Iowa Stored Energy Park Funding: Congressional Ear-mark CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Today's Presentation Past Present Future Funding CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE c CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Iowa's municipal utilities saw this. 1. Economic feasibility studies. 2. Geologic research. 3. Computer modeling. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Will ISEP make money? 1. Missouri River Energy Services. 2. Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Next steps: 1. Drill two test wells. 2. Pump tests, water & air. 3. Refine computer modeling. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Funding 1. Municipal utilities -$1.15 million. 2. DOE - $6 million. 3. Iowa Power Fund - $3.2 million.

286

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluating Utility Owned Evaluating Utility Owned Electric Energy Storage Systems: A Perspective for State Electric Utility Regulators DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review 2012 September 28, 2012 Dhruv Bhatnagar & Verne Loose Sandia National Laboratories Motivation for this Work  Many state utility regulatory bodies are unfamiliar with electric energy storage systems  The technology  The functional uses  The value of these uses to the grid  This leads to a handicap in their proper evaluation for rate base  May prevent the best (economic) technologies from system integration 2 Source: GE What we are doing  Developing a guidebook:  Inform regulators about the system benefits of energy storage  Identify regulatory challenges to increased

287

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Transmission Investment Assessment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Distributed Generation Technology Generation D d Technology Costs Efficiency Measures Demand Response Carbon Tax Electric Vehicles Transmission Planner - Generators respond:...

288

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

xxxvi | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Hydrogen Production and Delivery ........................................................................................................... 7 PD-014: Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Analysis .................................................................................. 10 PD-022: Fiber-Reinforced Composite Pipelines ........................................................................................ 14 PD-025: Hydrogen Embrittlement of Structural Steels .............................................................................. 20

289

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ANALYSIS ANALYSIS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 465 2013 - Systems Analysis Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Systems Analysis Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Systems Analysis Program: The reviewers considered the Systems Analysis program to be an essential component of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program's (the Program's) mission. The projects were considered to be appropriately diverse and focused on addressing technical barriers and meeting targets. In general, the reviewers noted that the Systems Analysis program is well managed and demonstrated the ability to address immediate analytical needs and overall objectives and plans, especially to implement the new initiative, H

290

R:\\Eco SSL\\Guidance Document\\Final Peer Review Draft Sent to...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of uncontaminated sites (Table 2-2). Logarithm of Toxicity Threshold Values N u m b e r critical review of soil criteria methods 2-6 Table 2-2. Assessment factors for...

291

Physics Procedia 34 (2012) 70 79 1875-3892 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of the Organising Committee of the CSP 2012  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

/or peer review under responsibility of the Organising Committee of the CSP 2012 Conference. doi:10.1016/j

Berthier, Ludovic

293

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

VALIDATION VALIDATION 380 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Technology Validation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Technology Validation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Technology Validation Program: In general, the reviewers believed the program area was adequately covered. The role of the Technology Validation program within the structure of the Fuel Cell Technologies Office was clearly identified. Progress relating to projects was clearly presented and plans were identified for addressing issues and challenges. The partnership with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL's) data collection/analysis team was seen as key to the success

294

Energy Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy¬タルs 2010 Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review July 29, 2010 The Department of Energy conducted a Peer Review of its Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) Research and Development Program on July 20-22, during which 28 R&D projects were presented for review by industry stakeholders. More than 65 energy sector stakeholders came to network, present, and learn about DOE projects, while more than 20 joined in by webinar. The CEDS program's national lab, academic, and industry partners-including the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) partners and Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) project- presented DOE-supported efforts involving secured SCADA communications and smart grid applications,

295

2012 SG Peer Review - SDE&G Borrego Springs Microgrid - Tom Bialek, SDG&E  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting SDG&E Borrego Springs Microgrid Demonstration Project Thomas Bialek, PhD, PE Principal Investigator June 8, 2012 December 2008 Borrego Springs Microgrid Demonstration Project Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) Budget Period 1 FY2008 - FY2010 Budget Period 2 FY2011 - FY2013 Total DOE Funding $1,241 $6,237 $7,477 Technical Scope Conduct a pilot scale "proof-of concept" demonstration of how advanced information- based technologies and distributed energy resources (DER) may increase asset utilization and reliability of the power grid in support of the national agenda. Establish a microgrid demonstration to prove the effectiveness of integrating multiple DER technologies, energy storage, feeder automation system technologies, and outage management

296

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PROGRAM COMMENTS PROGRAM COMMENTS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 529 Program Comments Provided by Reviewers Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Comments Hydrogen Production 1. Was the program area adequately covered? Were important issues and challenges identified? Was progress clearly presented in comparison to the previous year? (Include information presented in the plenary and/or session overview presentations of the program if appropriate.) The Hydrogen Production program area was very well covered-the important issues (including material performance and capital costs for all production pathways) and challenges were clearly described and progress was shown on examples for all research fields (including novel hydrogen production methods)

297

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

AND DELIVERY AND DELIVERY FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 7 2013 - Hydrogen Production and Delivery Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program: This review session evaluated hydrogen production and delivery research and development (R&D) activities in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Office (FCTO) in the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The hydrogen production projects reviewed represented a diverse portfolio of technologies to produce hydrogen from renewable energy sources. Production project sub-categories included water electrolysis, solar-driven thermochemical cycles, photoelectrochemical (PEC) direct water splitting, and biological hydrogen

298

Assessing physical workload for human-robot peer-based teams  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Peer-based human-robot teams involve both teammates working in the same physical space and contributing to the same goals. Predictions of human performance based upon environmental, internal, task and organizational influences have proven useful, but ... Keywords: Human performance moderator functions, Human-robot peer-based teams, Physical workload

Caroline E. Harriott, Tao Zhang, Julie A. Adams

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

D: PROJECTS NOT REVIEWED D: PROJECTS NOT REVIEWED 552 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report List of Projects Not Reviewed Project ID Project Title Principal Investigator Name Organization PD-004 Distributed Bio-Oil Reforming Stefan Czernik National Renewable Energy Laboratory PD-013 Electrolyzer Development for the Copper-Chlorine Thermochemical Cycle Michele Lewis Argonne National Laboratory PD-016 Oil-Free Centrifugal Hydrogen Compression Technology Demonstration Hooshang Heshmat Mohawk Innovative Technology PD-017 Development of a Centrifugal Hydrogen Pipeline Gas Compressor Frank Di Bella Concepts NREC PD-021 Development of High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Tank for Storage and Gaseous Truck Delivery Don Baldwin Hexagon Lincoln PD-027 Solar High-Temperature Water Splitting

300

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS 402 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Safety, Codes and Standards Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Safety, Codes and Standards Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Safety, Codes and Standards Program: The Safety, Codes and Standards program supports research and development (R&D) that provides the critical information needed to define requirements and close gaps in safety, codes, and standards to enable the safe use and handling of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. The program also conducts safety activities focused on promoting safety practices among U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) projects and the development of information resources and best practices. Reviewers recognized that the program continues to provide strong support in the following

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electric Power Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demonstration Project Jodi Startari Ashlawn Energy LLC Briefing Overview * Painesville Municipal Electric Power Plant Project Synopsis * Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Technology * City of Painesville Municipal Electric Plant History * Project Multiple Objectives and Additional Detail * Project Risk Analysis presented at previous Peer Review * Project to date progress * Cost Distribution * Summary/Conclusions * Future Tasks * Questions US Produced Vanadium Redox Flow Battery for Bulk Storage, Peak Shaving * 8 MW Hour redox flow battery (1MW 8 hours) * To be installed at Painesville Municipal Electric Plant (PMEP), a 32 MW coal fired facility * Most efficient PMEP operation is steady state at 26 MW (lowest emissions, lowest operating cost)

302

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION 442 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Market Transformation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Market Transformation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Market Transformation Program: The purpose of the Market Transformation program is to spur market growth for domestically produced hydrogen and fuel cell systems. By supporting increased sales in key early markets, this program helps to identify and overcome non-technical barriers to commercial deployment and to reduce the life cycle costs of fuel cell power by helping to achieve economies of scale. The current focus of the Market Transformation program is to build on past successes in lift truck and emergency backup power applications (part of the U.S. Department of Energy's [DOE's]

303

Report of the Peer Review Panel on the early site suitability evaluation of the Potential Repository Site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada; Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Yucca mountain Site Characterization Project Office (YMPO) assigned Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), the Technical and Management Support Services (T&MSS) contractor to the YmPo, the task of conducting an Early Site Suitability Evaluation (ESSE) of the Yucca mountain site as a potential site for a high-level radioactive waste repository. First, the assignment called for the development of a method to evaluate a single site against the DOE General Guidelines for Recommendation of Sites for Nuclear Waste Repositories, 10 CFR Part 960. Then, using this method, an evaluation team, the ESSE Core Team, of senior YMP scientists, engineers, and technical experts, evaluated new information obtained about the site since publication of the final Environmental Assessment (DOE, 1986) to determine if new suitability/unsuitability findings could be recommended. Finally, the Core Team identified further information and analyses needed to make final determinations for each of the guidelines. As part of the task, an independent peer review of the ESSE report has been conducted. Expertise was solicited that covered the entire spectrum of siting guidelines in 10 CFR Part 960 in order to provide a complete, in-depth critical review of the data evaluated and cited in the ESSE report, the methods used to evaluate the data, and the conclusions and recommendations offered by the report. Fourteen nationally recognized technical experts (Table 2) served on the Peer Review Panel. The comments from the Panel and the responses prepared by the ESSE Core Team, documented on formal Comment Response Forms, constitute the body of this document.

NONE

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

304

Peering Information  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peering Information Network Overview Tools Peering Information Interactive Network Map Network Maps Connected Sites Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US)...

305

PROGRAM REVIEW Rubric for Assessing the Integration of Student Learning Assessment into Program Reviews  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to improve their work. Well-qualified internal and external reviewers evaluate the program's learningPROGRAM REVIEW Rubric for Assessing the Integration of Student Learning Assessment into Program Reviews Criterion Initial Emerging Developed Highly Developed Required Elements of the Self-Study Program

306

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Estimation of Capital and Levelized Cost for Redox Flow Batteries - Vilayanur Viswanathan, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Estimation of Capital and Levelized Estimation of Capital and Levelized Cost for Redox Flow Batteries V. Viswanathan, A. Crawford, L. Thaller 1 , D. Stephenson, S. Kim, W. Wang, G. Coffey, P. Balducci, Z. Gary Yang 2 , Liyu Li 2 , M. Kintner-Meyer, V. Sprenkle 1 Consultant 2 UniEnergy Technology September 28, 2012 USDOE-OE ESS Peer Review Washington, DC Dr. Imre Gyuk - Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability 1 What are we trying to accomplish? PNNL grid analytics team has established ESS cost targets for various applications PNNL cost/performance model estimates cost for redox flow battery systems of various chemistries drives research internally to focus on most important components/parameters/metrics for cost reduction and performance improvement

307

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

A: ATTENDEE LIST A: ATTENDEE LIST FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 511 Attendee List: 2013 Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Last Name First Name Organization Abdel-Baset Tarek Chrysler Group LLC Abraham Judi Conference Management Associates, Inc. Aceves Salvador Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Adams Jesse U.S. Department of Energy, Golden Field Office Adzic Radoslav Brookhaven National Laboratory Afzal Kareem PDC Machines Agar Ertan Drexel University Agrawal Nisha Defense Production Act Committee Ahluwalia Rajesh Argonne National Laboratory Ahmed Aysha National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ahmed Shabbir Argonne National Laboratory Ahn Channing U.S. Department of Energy (IPA from California Institute of Technology) Ahn Sang Hyun National Institute of Standards and Technology

308

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: AEP Ohio gridSMART Demonstration Project - Karen Sloneker, Columbus Southern Power (AEP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting AEP Ohio gridSMART ® Demonstration Project Karen Sloneker AEP Ohio gridSMART Project Director ® December 2008 AEP Ohio gridSMART ® Demonstration Project Objectives * To build an integrated secure smart grid infrastructure. * Attract, educate, enlist and retain consumers using innovative business models that provide tools to reduce costs, consumption and peak demand. * Gather data on technology and smart grid business models to forecast national impact. Life-cycle Funding 2010 - 2013 $73,660,317 Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) * 110,000 AMI meters and associated infrastructure * Consumer Managed Energy Technology (experimental tariffs, consumer programs, web portal; smart appliances, and plug-in electric vehicles) * Innovative Demand Management * Distribution Automation and Reliability

309

2012 SG Peer Review - The Perfect Power Prototype for the Illinois Institute of Technology - Mohmmad Shahidehpour, IIT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Perfect Power Progress Report Perfect Power Progress Report Dr. Mohammad Shahidehpour DOE Peer Review | June 2012 Perfect Power @ IIT Perfect Power @ IIT Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy * $13.6M ($7.6M from DOE, $6M Cost Share) * 5 year project * Located at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) * Involves the entire campus * Partners: IIT, Exelon, S&C Electric, Schweitzer, IPS, Eaton Corporation, ZBB, CIYCOR, Continental Electric, Intelligent Generation This project aligns with the OE mission and the Smart Grid program goals to develop technologies to modernize the electric grid, enhance security and reliability of the energy infrastructure, and facilitate recovery from disruptions to energy supply. Leadership Mohammad Shahidehpour (Principal Investigator) Project Advisor ComEd/Exelon

310

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Sodium Ion Battery for Grid Level Applications - Ted Wiley, Aquion Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Progress Report Progress Report Smart Grid Demonstration Program Ted Wiley, Jay Whitacre Department of Energy Peer Review 26 September, 2012 Confidential Information of Aquion Energy, Inc. 2 Thanks to Our Supporters Confidential Information of Aquion Energy, Inc. 3 About Aquion Energy Founded on the belief that stationary energy storage must be: * Safe: Non-toxic and immune to catastrophic failure events * Reliable: Long lasting and capable of operating in abusive environments * Affordable: Made from abundant, simple materials via a scalable manufacturing process This principle demands a new type of energy storage: Aqueous Hybrid Ion Batteries Designed for stationary, long-duration applications * Utilities-various grid services * Microgrids-telco, mining, commercial/residential solar, military,

311

ESS 2012 Peer Review - PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting - Steve Willard, PNM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mexico (PNM) - Mexico (PNM) - PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting DOE Peer Review Steve Willard, P.E. September 26, 2012 Project Goals - Develop an even more Beneficial Renewable Resource - Transferable Nationwide Renewable Resource Transferable Nationwide *Created a dispatchable, renewables-based peaking resource *Combined PV and storage at a substation targeting 15% peak-load reduction D t ti bi ti th t i lt l iti t lt l l *Demonstrating a combination that can simultaneously mitigate voltage-level fluctuations as well as enable load shifting *Developed power system models (baseline and projected), and cost/benefit economic models eco o c ode s *Generating, collecting, analyzing and sharing resultant data *Enabling distributed solutions that reduce GHG emissions through the

312

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ron Melton, Battelle Memorial Institute  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Overview Overview Ron Melton, Ph.D., Project Director Don Hammerstrom, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Battelle, Pacific Northwest Division Presented at DOE-OE Smart Grid R&D Peer Review June 8, 2012 PNWD-SA-9876 Pacific Northwest Demonstration Project What: * $178M, ARRA-funded, 5-year demonstration * 60,000 metered customers in 5 states Why: * Quantify costs and benefits * Develop communications protocol * Develop standards * Facilitate integration of wind and other renewables Who: Led by Battelle and partners including BPA, 11 utilities, 2 universities, and 5 vendors 2 Project Basics 3 Transactive Control Operational objectives Manage peak demand Facilitate renewable resources Address constrained resources Improve system reliability and efficiency Select economical

313

2012 SG Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Robert Boehm, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

S S t G id P 2012 Smart Grid Program Peer Review Meeting "D ti D d R d ti "Dramatic Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest" Robert F Boehm Robert F. Boehm Center for Energy Research University of Nevada Las Vegas June 8, 2012 "Dramatic Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest" in the Desert Southwest Objective Decrease the peak electrical demand by 65% over code-built houses in a new development of 185 homes. Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY08 - FY13 (now FY15) Technical Scope 1. Build energy conserving residences. 2. Include PV on the residences. FY08 - FY13 (now FY15) $6948k 3. Develop a demand control system that gives the customer options and that is enhanced by an artificial intelligence supplemental system. Instantaneous December 2008 power pricing information will be available

314

Scientometric analysis of publications in the area of nanoenergy based on the materials of the peer-reviewed journal of VINITI RAS Physics of Nanoobjects and Nanotechnology  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Based on the analysis of a range of key publications in the area of nanoenergy, which, among other journals, were reflected in the Physics of Nanoobjects and Nanotechnology issue of the peer-reviewed journal that was published by the All-Russia ... Keywords: nanoenergy, nanomaterials, nanoobjects, nanophysics, scientometrics, solar cells

N. M. Builova; A. I. Osipov

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

315

DOE Hydrogen Program 2004 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This document summarizes the project evaluations and comments from the DOE Hydrogen Program 2004 Annual Program Review. Hydrogen production, delivery and storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; and education R&D projects funded by DOE in FY2004 are reviewed.

Not Available

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Solid State Li Metal Batteries for Grid...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Review 2012 Mohit Singh, VP R&D and Engineering Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program from the Department of Energy through the National Energy Technology...

317

Microsoft PowerPoint - 2010 CEDS Peer Review SEI CERT SCALe  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

increasingly sophisticated hacker tools Major Successes: Preliminary analysis of SCADA system completed Schedule: Draft TR 710; assessment and certification of commercial...

318

A Review of World Hydrocarbon Resource Assessments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This study reviews assessments of world oil, natural gas, and oil shale resources made between the end of World War II and the end of 1980. Details are provided on the methods used in developing these assessments, geographic coverage, time horizons, and major assumptions (e.g., about discovery rates and recovery factor). Conclusions on the current state of knowledge concerning each of these hydrocarbon resources are presented.

1982-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

2006 Peered Reviewed Archival Publications Adjeroh, D.A., Y. Zhang*  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and hybrid electric vehicles. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 56: 898-910. (MAE) Upadhyay properties of rubber-toughened post- industrial glass-fiber reinforced PA 66. Int. Polym. Processing. 21: 189 emissions from heavy-duty diesel vehicles: review and recent data. Journal of Air and Waste Management

Mohaghegh, Shahab

320

Final External Peer Review Report for Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: This reviewer was chosen primarily for his expertise in civil engineering (dredging, wetlands and coastal experience with flood management, wetland restoration, restoration design, marsh restoration, and coastal relative SLR in coastal Louisiana, and the EPA projections of accelerated SLR in the future, will have

US Army Corps of Engineers

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Microsoft PowerPoint - 2010 CEDS Peer Review SEI OCTAVE BES.pptx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CERT OCTAVE BES CERT OCTAVE BES Summary Slide: CERT OCTAVE BES Guidance in Identifying and Managing Electricity Sector Risk Outcomes: An operational cyber security risk assessment approach for the BES community. Roadmap Challenges: Limited ability to measure and assess cyber security posture, lack of consistent security posture, lack of consistent cyber security metrics, poor understanding of cyber risks, and weak business case for cyber security investments. Major Successes: Assessment methodology codified and first pilot scheduled to begin in August. Schedule: Pilot (08/10), Draft Methodology Report (09/10), Pilots 2 and 3 (10/10), Final Report and Training available (12/10). Level of Effort: $300K Funds Remaining: $234K Performers: SEI Partners: NERC CIP, AECC, and

322

ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Battery Component Development - Wei Wang, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Battery Component Development Wei Wang, Qingtao Luo, Xiaoliang Wei, Bin Li, Zimin Nie, Baowei Chen, Yuyan Shao, Vijayakumar Murugesan, Amy Chen, Gordon, Xia, Liyu Li, Gary Z. Yang, Vincent Sprenkle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Boulevard P. O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352, USA DOE Stationary Energy Storage Program Review, Washington, DC Sept. 26-28, 2012 Dr. Imre Gyuk 1 2 Review of previous work 2.5M, ~30Wh/L, -5~50 o C Mixed-acid VRB Double Energy Density Extend temperature window Charge Discharge Charge Discharge Charge Discharge Catholyte: VO 2+ + Cl - + H 2 O - e VO 2 Cl + 2H + ε co =1.0 V Anolyte: V 3+ + e V 2+ ε ao =-0.25 Overall: VO 2+ + Cl

323

Microsoft PowerPoint - 2010 CEDS Peer Review SEI CERT SCALe  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Robert C. Seacord Robert C. Seacord CERT / Software Engineering Institute Source Code Analysis Laboratory (SCALe) Summary Slide: SCALe Outcomes: Create an operational capability for application conformance testing and certification against CERT secure coding standards. Roadmap Challenge: Limited SCALe Merged Diagnostics Probable Confirmed Diagnostics Analysis Tool Analysis Tool Analysis Tool Client Code Diagnostics Build Environment Roadmap Challenge: Limited ability to measure and assess cyber security posture/no consistent cyber security metrics/increasingly sophisticated hacker tools Major Successes: Preliminary analysis of SCADA system completed Schedule: Draft TR 7/10; assessment and certification of commercial SCADA application 11/10 Level of Effort: $250K Funds Remaining:

324

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LADWP Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Project - Mukhlesur Bhuiyan, City of Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting San Diego, CA Los Angeles Department of Water and Power - Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Program Mukhles Bhuiyan Program Director June 8, 2012 December 2008 Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Program Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY10/11 - FY15/16 $60,280K Match Grant Technical Scope *Integrate Electric Vehicles into the LADWP grid *Demonstrate integrated Demand Response operation and technology. *Develop a comprehensive portfolio of Customer Behavior studies *Demonstrate next generation of Cyber Security *Using test bed sites to deploy and demonstrate an integrated communication, demand response, and electric vehicle infrastructure, protected by the next generation cyber security. *All this will be done in conjunction with consumer behavior studies identifying methods to

325

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Summary: Transmission Investment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty about Fuel Prices, Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty about Fuel Prices, Technology, Renewables Penetration and Market Responses using a Multi-Stage Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse (Year 2) Project Lead: Hobbs Co-investigators: Schuler, Zimmerman July 20, 2012 1. Project objective To develop and apply a methodology for evaluating the impact of market, technology, and policy uncertainties upon transmission planning on a regional and multi-decadal time scale. The methodology will integrate transmission capacity expansion decisions and OPF methodologies in a decomposition scheme in order to rigorously capture operational constraints such as security constraints, ramp limitations, and transmission flow limits, as well as longer term investment issues. The methodology would address questions such

326

2012 CERTS LAAR Program Peer Review - Load as a Regulation Resource, Phase 2 - Sila Kiliccote, LBNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group Load as a Regulation Resource Sila Kiliccote, Jason MacDonald, Livio Fenga and Dave Watson Demand Response Research Center Grid Integration Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory http://drrc.lbl.gov CERTS review September 20, 2012 Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group Outline  Phase 1 summary - Overview of OpenADR - Major Phase 1 accomplishments  Project objectives  Tasks and major technical accomplishments completed  Deliverables and schedule  Risk Factors  Follow-on Work Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Department  Grid Integration Group What is OpenADR and how does it work? Signaling- continuous, 2-way, secure messaging system for dynamic prices, emergency and

327

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications Daiwon Choi, Vilayanur V. Viswanathan, Wei Wang, Vincent L. Sprenkle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Blvd., P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352, USA DOE Energy Storage Program Review, Washington, DC Sept. 26-28, 2012 Acknowledgment: Dr. Imre Gyuk - Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability  Investigate the Li-ion battery for stationary energy storage unit in ~kWh level.  Fabrication and optimization of LiFePO 4 / Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 18650 cell.  Li-ion battery energy storage with effective thermal management.  Improve rate and cycle life of Li-ion battery.  Screen possible new cathode/anode electrode materials and its combinations

328

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Essence of Structure Preserving Network Reductions - Dan Tylavsky  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tylavsky & Di Shi Tylavsky & Di Shi Arizona State University Hyungseon Oh University of Buffalo William Schulze, Ray Zimmerman, Dick Shuler, John Taber, Jubo Yan, Charles Marquet Cornell University Dan Shawhan Rensselaer Polytechnic University Overview * Motivation-Develop network Eq's for US for generator investment studies * Review (Modified) Ward-type network equivalent - Apply to EI, ERCOT & WECC - Model accuracy evaluation * Effect of dc model reduction * Effect of ac v. dc approximation * Base case, change cases & OPF * Bus Aggregation--A different approach for reduction * Clustering * Equivalent branch reactances * Accuracy * Conclusions Study Objective * Develop a backbone equivalent network model of the entire United States as a tool (to be made public domain) for the future

329

ESS 2012 Peer Review - ARPA-E Storage Overview - Mark Johnson, DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Storage Overview Storage Overview September 26, 2012 DOE Energy Storage Review Mark Johnson Advanced Research Projects Agency * Energy 2006 Rising Above the Gathering Storm (National Academies) 2007 America COMPETES Act ARPA-E Launched at National Academies: April 27, 2009 First Funding Announcement: May 2, 2009 Innovation based on science and engineering will be primary driver of our future prosperity & security 2009 ARRA ($400M appropriated) A Brief History of of ARPA-E FY11 Budget CR ($180M appropriated) FY12 Budget ($275M appropriated) 2 Advanced Research Projects Agency * Energy Venture Capital and Small Businesses Private Equity/Capital & Large Corporations Government Procurement Office of Science Applied Energy Offices Technology Maturity

330

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Multi-period Multi-period Stochastic Optimization with Evolving Information Ray Zimmerman, Carlos Murillo-Sánchez, C. Lindsay Anderson, Bob Thomas, Amandeep Gupta, Daniel Muñoz-Álvarez CERTS Review, Cornell University August 7-8, 2012 Outline * Project Overview - progress on underlying tools - current focus * Design of Receding Horizon Framework * Uncertainty in Receding Horizon Input Data (i.e. "feeding the monster") 2 SuperOPF Map 3 MATPOWER SuperOPF Planning Tool 1 st gen SuperOPF AC and DC versions 3 rd gen SuperOPF 2 nd gen SuperOPF AC and DC versions extensible OPF architecture high performance solvers single-period explicit contingencies stochastic cost endogenous reserves 2-stage simulation structure environmental costs

331

2012 CERTS LAAR Program Peer Review - Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation - Nasr Alkadi, ORNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nasr Alkadi, Ph.D. Nasr Alkadi, Ph.D. Michael Starke, PhD Oak Ridge National Laboratory CERTS Internal Program Review FY12 DOE-CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation September 20, 2012 2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Project objective: Scoping of Regulation Reserves in Industrial Sector 2 Alcoa's Smelting Process is a significant regulation asset at Warrick, IN. * Alcoa has demonstrated Regulation Band in the 50 MW range (25/25) * Represents ~10% of BL of 500 MW) 1. Develop an estimate of the amount of regulation that could reasonably be expected from industrial loads based on publicly available information. 2. Analyze the potential impact of regulation on the manufacturing process.

332

Performance assessment review for Department of Energy  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The United State Department of Energy (US DOE) disposes of low-level radioactive waste in near-surface disposal facilities. Safety of the disposal operations is evaluated for operational safety as well as long-term safety. Operational safety is evaluated based on the perceived level of hazard of the operation and may vary from a simple safety assessment to a safety analysis report. Long-term safety of all low-level waste disposal systems is evaluated through the conduct of a radiological performance assessment. The US DOE has established radiological performance objectives for disposal of low-level waste. They are to protect a member of the general public from receiving over 25 mrem/y, and an inadvertent intruder into the waste from receiving over 100 mrem/y continuous exposure or 400 mrem from a single exposure. For a disposal system to be acceptable, a performance assessment (PA) must be prepared which must be technically accurate and provide reasonable assurance that these performance objectives are met. Technical quality of the performance assessments is reviewed by a panel of experts. A number of lessons have been learned from conducting several preliminary reviews of performance assessments. These lessons are shared among the various US DOE sites to improve the process of evaluating low-level waste disposal sites for long-term performance.

Wilhite, E.L.

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

Performance assessment review for Department of Energy  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The United State Department of Energy (US DOE) disposes of low-level radioactive waste in near-surface disposal facilities. Safety of the disposal operations is evaluated for operational safety as well as long-term safety. Operational safety is evaluated based on the perceived level of hazard of the operation and may vary from a simple safety assessment to a safety analysis report. Long-term safety of all low-level waste disposal systems is evaluated through the conduct of a radiological performance assessment. The US DOE has established radiological performance objectives for disposal of low-level waste. They are to protect a member of the general public from receiving over 25 mrem/y, and an inadvertent intruder into the waste from receiving over 100 mrem/y continuous exposure or 400 mrem from a single exposure. For a disposal system to be acceptable, a performance assessment (PA) must be prepared which must be technically accurate and provide reasonable assurance that these performance objectives are met. Technical quality of the performance assessments is reviewed by a panel of experts. A number of lessons have been learned from conducting several preliminary reviews of performance assessments. These lessons are shared among the various US DOE sites to improve the process of evaluating low-level waste disposal sites for long-term performance.

Wilhite, E.L.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Microsoft PowerPoint - 2010 CEDS Peer Review SEI CERT RMM [Read-Only]  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Adapting CERT-RMM to the Electricity Sector Adapting CERT-RMM to the Electricity Sector Summary: Adapting CERT-RMM to the Electricity Sector Outcomes: A subset of CERT-RMM tailored to the electricity sector Roadmap Challenge: Limited ability to measure and assess cyber security posture No consistent cyber security metrics No consistent cyber security metrics Poor understanding of cyber risks Weak business case for cyber security investments Major Successes: Presented RMM to leading utilities and received strong validation of need and applicability Schedule: pilot kickoff 9/10 Level of Effort: $225K Funds Remaining: $215K Performers: SEI Partners: piloting utilities Resilience defined The physical property of a material that can return to its original shape or position after deformation that does

335

2012 SG Peer Review - LANL Smart Grid Technology Test Bed - Scott Backhaus, LANL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Test Bed Technology Test Bed Scott Backhaus Los Alamos National Laboratory June 8, 2012 December 2008 Smart Grid Technology Test Bed Objectives Life-cycle Funding ($K) Technical Scope - Create and demonstrate a replicable DER control system-focus on small electrical utilities and co-operatives - Integration of renewables - Planning of DER portfolios - Assess economic DER value - Development/characterization of DER - Commercial HVAC - Run-of-river hydro  Model predictive control (MPC) of diverse portfolios of distributed resources  Optimal/controllable modification of the statistics of PV variability  Data-driven models for control of HVAC in large commercial buildings  Models/control of run-of-river hydro-river impacts 2 FY10-11 FY12 FY13 Request FY14 Request 350 300 400 400

336

Peer review presentation on systems performance modeling and solar advisor support.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Accurate Performance Models are Critical to Project Development and Technology Evaluation - Accuracy and Uncertainty of Commonly-Used Models Unknown and Models Disagree. A Model Evaluation Process Has Been Developed with Industry, and High-Quality Weather and System Performance Data Sets Have Been Collected: (1) Evaluation is Underway using Residual Analysis of Hourly and Sub-Hourly Data for Clear and Diffuse Climates to Evaluate and Improve Models; and (2) Initial Results Have Been or Will Soon Be Presented at Key Conferences. Evaluation of Widely-Used Module, Inverter, and Irradiance Models, Including Those in SAM, PVWatts, and PVSyst, Will Be Completed This Year. Stochastic Modeling Has Been Performed to Support Reliability Task and Will Add Value to Parametric Analysis. An Industry Workshop will be Held This Fall To Review Results, Set Priorities. Support and Analysis has been Provided for TPP's, SETP, and PV Community. Goals for Future Work Include: (1) Improving Understanding of and Validating System Derate Factors; and (2) Developing a Dynamic Electrical Model of Arrays with Shaded or Mismatched Modules to Support Transient Analysis of Large Fields.

Cameron, Christopher P.

2010-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

Review and validation of exposure assessment methods  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The purpose of this research is twofold, to standardize and to validate exposure assessment methods. First, the attempt is made to standardize the manner in which exposure assessment methods are developed. Literature on the subject is reviewed and seven common elements discovered to be common are discussed. The seven elements are causative agents, exposure groups, exposure-modifying parameters, industrial hygiene measurement data, misclassification issues, validation issues, and reliability issues. It is believed that thinking in terms of these elements will yield more consistent and complete exposure assessment models. Three types of exposure estimation methods are reviewed in this form. These methods are selected because they are the most thorough and represent the most frequently used and referenced types of estimation strategies: the statistical model, the deterministic model, and the multiplicative model. Second, the paper reports on an attempt to validate a semiquantitative exposure assessment model against industrial hygiene data collected from employees of one firm in the maritime industry. The set of data contains 440 samples with 75 percent of them censored by the method limit of detection. Methods to calculate an average concentration with nondetectable data are discussed. It is concluded that (1) the model does not predict the data well, (2) the industrial hygiene data does not properly fit the tails of a lognormal distribution, and (3) that average exposure to benzene in the (un)loading of petrochemicals from tankers is decidedly below exposure limits.

Shaw, Eduardo

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

CEDS 2010 Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Philip A Craig Jr Philip A Craig Jr Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Real-Time Security State Visualization Real-Time Security State Visualization  Outcomes: Near real-time situational awareness utilizing a diverse set of data feeds with a flexible visualization implementation.  Roadmap Challenge: Fusing perimeter security, network traffic analysis, signature-based intrusion detection systems, routable and serial traffic analysis.  Major Successes: Produced an integrated view of real-time network and physical security events at a power substation  Schedule: Deliver 1 st POC, 2 nd POC Fall 2010  Level of Effort: $325K  Funds Remaining: $75K  Performers: PNNL  Partners: ANL, STI, OSIsoft High Level Illustration of Functions/Components Real-Time Security State Visualization

339

Peer Reviewed Archival Publications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

size during the blending of relatively-inelastic polymer melts. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 23: 135. Characteristics and carbonization behaviors of coal extracts. Fuel Processing Technology 79: 207-215. Stiller, A

Mohaghegh, Shahab

340

CEDS 2010 Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Produced an integrated view of real-time network and physical security events at a power substation Schedule: Deliver 1 st POC, 2 nd POC Fall 2010 Level of Effort:...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

For Peer Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Here ?E denotes the total time derivative of the total mechanical energy, ..... The distance function dC, which measures the distance to a closed set C, is given by:.

342

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

motor controller inverter system. (In work) * 2008 Task 2 * Continue integration of direct cooled HTS system with the rotor assembly (95% of hardware is complete, last upgrades...

343

Peer Reviewed Archival Publications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. (Roger) Chen Chen, H.L. and Y. He* . 2001. Analysis of an acoustic surface waveguide for AE monitoring, and A.L. Miller. 2001. SO2 removal by leaching coal pyrite. Energy and Fuels 15: 470-476. Dady B. Dadyburjor Zhu+ , J.S., L.P. Norcio, E.L. Kugler, D.B. Dadyburjor, J.L. Yang+ , Z.Y. Liu+ , and B. Zhong

Mohaghegh, Shahab

344

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2005 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2005 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

345

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2006 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2006 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

346

WP_Peer_Rev_Spec_Top_Rpts.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Package Materials Performance Peer Review Package Materials Performance Peer Review A Compilation of Special Topic Reports Compiled and Edited by Frank M.G. Wong and Joe H. Payer May 31, 2002 Special Topic Reports prepared for the Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review. The Final Report of the Peer Review was submitted to U.S. Department of Energy and Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC on February 28, 2002. ii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Special Topic Reports prepared for the Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review. The Final Report of the Peer Review was submitted to U.S. Department of Energy and Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC on February 28, 2002. iii Table of Contents Introduction Design And Fabrication Factors 1. Fabrication Processes and Metallurgy: Peer Review Sub-Panel Meeting F. Wong

347

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty & Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty & High Renewable Penetration: Representing Market Response using a Multi-stage Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse Model Approach with Recourse Benjamin F. Hobbs & Francisco Munoz Geography & Environmental Engineering Applied Math & Stat Geography & Environmental Engineering, Applied Math & Stat. Environment, Energy, Sustainability & Health Institute The Johns Hopkins University Richard E Schuler Richard E. Schuler Civil & Environmental Engineering, and Economics Cornell University August 2, 2011 Thanks to Saamrat Kasina and Harry van der Weijde for their assistance, and DOE CERTS for funding and DOE CERTS for funding O i Overview 1. The problem 1. The problem

348

Independent peer review panel report on the integrated nonthermal treatment systems study and the comparison of integrated thermal and integrated nonthermal treatment systems for mixed low level waste  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) Office of Science and Technology (OST) has conducted studies of integrated thermal treatment systems and integrated nonthermal treatment systems (INTS) for treating contact handled, alpha and non-alpha mixed low level radioactive waste (MLLW). The MLLW in the DOE complex consists of a wide variety of organic and inorganic solids and liquids contaminated with radioactive substances. Treatment systems are needed to destroy organic material and stabilize residues prior to land disposal. In May 1996 the Deputy Assistant Secretary for OST appointed an Independent Peer Review Panel to: (1) review and comment on the INTS Study; (2) make recommendations on the most promising thermal and nonthermal treatment systems; (3) make recommendations on research and development necessary to prove the performance of nonthermal and thermal technologies; and (4) review and comment on the preliminary draft of the ITTS/INTS Comparison Report. This report presents the primary conclusions and recommendations based on the review of the INTS study and the comparison report. System selection, overviews, comparisons, cost estimations and sensitivity analyses, and recommended R and D engineering needs are then described and discussed.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2009 Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

350

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: KCP&L Green Impact Zone Smart Grid Demonstration - Edward Hedges, Kansas City Power & Light  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting KCP&L Green Impact Zone SmartGrid Demonstration Project Edward T. Hedges, P.E. Manager SmartGrid Technology Planning Kansas City Power & Light Company June 8, 2012 December 2008 KCP&L Green Impact Zone SmartGrid Demonstration Project Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) 2010 - 2014 $23,940,112 Technical Scope First, Create a complete, end-to-end Smart Grid Second, Introduce new technologies, applications, protocols, communications and business models Third, Incorporates a best-in-class approach to technology integration through use of Smart Grid interoperability standards Finally, Support a targeted urban revitalization effort in Kansas City's Green Impact Zone 2 - SmartSubstation - SmartDistribution - SmartGeneration - SmartDR/DER

351

Radioactive waste isolation in salt: Peer review of the Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation's draft report on an issues hierarchy and data needs for site characterization  

SciTech Connect

At the request of the Salt Repository Project (SRPO), Argonne National Laboratory conducted an independent peer review of a report by the Battelle Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation entitled ''Salt Repository Project Issues Hierarchy and Data Needs for Site Characterization (Draft).'' This report provided a logical structure for evaluating the outstanding questions (issues) related to selection and licensing of a site as a high-level waste repository. It also provided a first estimate of the information and data necessary to answer or resolve those questions. As such, this report is the first step in developing a strategy for site characterization. Microfiche copies of ''Draft Issues Hierarchy, Resolution Strategy, and Information Needs for Site Characterization and Environmental/Socioeconomic Evaluation - July, 1986'' and ''Issues Hierarchy and Data Needs for Site Characterization - February, 1985'' are included in the back pocket of this report.

Harrison, W.; Fenster, D.F.; Ditmars, J.D.; Paddock, R.A.; Rote, D.M.; Hambley, D.F.; Seitz, M.G.; Hull, A.B.

1986-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

352

2010 Solar Program Peer Review Report: An Independent Evaluation of Program Activities for FY2009 and FY2010  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of experts at the DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program's 2010 Program Review meeting, held on May 24?27, 2010, in Washington, D.C.

DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

353

Photovoltaic markets: a review and assessment  

SciTech Connect

Available information on potential markets for photovoltaic power systems is reviewed. A set of key parameters which affect the rate of photovoltaic market penetration is used to develop a simple anaytical structure that characterizes potential markets. Completed studies on photovoltaic markets were reviewed to describe potential markets using this structure. Selected markets were then examined in greater detail in a market demand workshop attended by potential purchasers in these markets. Available information, while sufficient to provide a rudimentary indication of how markets might develop, does not allow the construction of any single market scenario in which a high level of confidence can be placed. Major uncertainties in the available information on photovoltaic markets are highlighted.

Posner, D. M.

1979-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

354

DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review The U.S. Department of Energy has issued for public review and comment a draft environmental assessment of the potential environmental impacts of building an internal road to safely ship radioactive material within the Idaho National Laboratory. DOE�s preferred alternative under the environmental assessment is to develop a new, internal road that would connect the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center with the Materials and Fuels Complex, a distance of about 20 miles. It would allow the INL to safely ship nuclear materials from the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center and the Materials and Fuels Complex without having to utilize public roads, like Highway 20, which adds additional cost and security considerations to each shipment.

355

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Solid State Li Metal Batteries for Grid-Scale Energy Storage - Mohit Singh, Seeo  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Review 2012 Annual Review 2012 Mohit Singh, VP R&D and Engineering Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program from the Department of Energy through the National Energy Technology Laboratory Copyright ©2012 Seeo Inc. All rights reserved Conventional Li Ion Seeo Battery Li Foil Anode Dry Solid Separator Dry Polymer Cathode Composite Al Current Collector Cu Current Collector Porous Graphite Anode Composite Porous Separator Porous Cathode Composite Al Current Collector Element Li Ion Seeo Seeo Benefits Electrolyte Liquid Solid Safety: Non-reactive and non-flammable Energy: Superior specific energy (Wh/kg) Reliability: High temp stability, minimal fade Anode Porous Solid Cathode Porous Solid Seeo's solid polymer battery

356

ORISE: Implementing Improvements to Benefit the Scientific Peer...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Application The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) sets the standard for automated scientific peer reviews by continuously implementing process...

357

EA-1617: Draft Environmental Assessment for Public Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment for Public Review Environmental Assessment for Public Review DOE/EA-1617 Lovell-Yellowtail and Basin-Lovell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Big Horn County, Wyoming and Big Horn and Carbon Counties, Montana U.S. Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration Rocky Mountain Region Loveland, Colorado Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service July 2011 Montana Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Assessment for Public Review DOE/EA-1617 Lovell-Yellowtail and Basin-Lovell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Big Horn and Carbon Counties, Montana and Big Horn County, Wyoming U.S. Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration Rocky Mountain Region Loveland, Colorado Cooperating Agencies:

358

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - A Business Model for Retail Aggregation of Responsive Load - Shmuel Oren  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Load Load Control Aggregation Shmuel S. Oren UC Berkeley, California CERTS REVIEW Cornell University, Ithaca NY August 7-8, 2012 PSERC 2 A Smart Grid Vision "Homeostatic Utility Control is an overall concept which tries to maintain an internal equilibrium between supply and demand. Equilibrating forces are obtained over longer time scales (5 minutes and up) by economic principles through an Energy Marketplace using time-varying spot prices. " F.C. Schweppe et al. "HOMEOSTATIC UTILITY CONTROL," IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-99, No. 3, May/June 1980 Offered to commercial and industrial customers with load > 500KW

359

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Hydrogen-Bromine Flow Batteries for Grid-Scale Energy Storage - Vincent Battaglia, LBNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

H H 2 /Br 2 Flow Battery for Grid-Scale Energy Storage Venkat Srinivasan, Adam Weber, & Vince Battaglia Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory * DOE ESS Review * Washington, DC * September 26, 2012 vsbattaglia@lbl.gov Purpose Develop a low-cost, energy-storage system with high power density at 80% efficiency Use H 2 and Br 2 in a flow battery Future Plans Modeling Funding from ARPA-E GRIDS, USDOE LBNL: Kyu Taek Cho (Cell studies); Paul Ridgway (Catalysis studies); Sophia Haussener (Transport modeling) Bosch: Paul Albertus (Cost Modeling); Roel Sanchez-Carrera and Boris Kozinsky (Catalyst theory)

360

Approximate query answering in unstructured peer-to-peer databases.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??Peer-to-peer networks are considered the new generation of distributed databases, termed peer-to-peer databases. With very large size, open architecture, and extreme dynamism and autonomy, approximate (more)

Banaei-Kashani, Farnoush

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Review of the Diablo Canyon probabilistic risk assessment  

SciTech Connect

This report details the review of the Diablo Canyon Probabilistic Risk Assessment (DCPRA). The study was performed under contract from the Probabilistic Risk Analysis Branch, Office of Nuclear Reactor Research, USNRC by Brookhaven National Laboratory. The DCPRA is a full scope Level I effort and although the review touched on all aspects of the PRA, the internal events and seismic events received the vast majority of the review effort. The report includes a number of independent systems analyses sensitivity studies, importance analyses as well as conclusions on the adequacy of the DCPRA for use in the Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.

Bozoki, G.E.; Fitzpatrick, R.G.; Bohn, M.P. [Sandia National Lab., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Sabek, M.G. [Atomic Energy Authority, Nuclear Regulatory and Safety Center, Cairo (Egypt); Ravindra, M.K.; Johnson, J.J. [EQE Engineering, San Francisco, CA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Understanding the Effects of Data Quality on Market Functions - Lang Tong  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Data Data Quality and its Effects on Market Functions Lang Tong, Robert J. Thomas, Liyan Jia, and Jinsub Kim School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Cornell University, Ithaca, New York CERTS Review, August 8, 2012 Tong, Thomas, Jia, Kim (Cornell University) Data Quality on Market Functions 8/8/2012 1 / 33 Project Overview Objectives: The main objective of this research is to investigate how data quality affects market functions of current and future grids: develop models and measures of data quality; quantify risks of bad and malicious data; develop techniques to isolate and mitigate effects of bad and malicious data. Tong, Thomas, Jia, Kim (Cornell University) Data Quality on Market Functions 8/8/2012 2 / 33 Project Overview Objectives: The main objective of this research is to investigate how data quality affects market functions of current and future grids: develop models

363

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Evaluating the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand - Tim Mount  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluating the Effects of Managing Evaluating the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand and Distributed Energy Resources Locally on System Performance and Costs Tim Mount and Ray Zimmerman Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Alejandro Dominguez-Garcia Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign CERTS Review, Cornell, August 7-8, 2012 An NSF I/UCRC Collaborative Research on the Smart Grid PSERC Researchers at Cornell Engineers Economists Lindsay Anderson Wooyoung Jeon* Hsiao-Dong Chiang Alberto Lamadrid* Andrew Hunter Jung Youn Mo* Bob Thomas Surin Maneevitjit* Lang Tong Tim Mount Max Zhang Dick Schuler Ray Zimmerman Bill Schulze + Hao Lu* Judy Cardell, Smith College +

364

Technology Review and Assessment of Distributed Energy Resources  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The investigators reviewed and assessed the current status of distributed generation (DG) in the U.S. as it applies to smaller-scale installations (residential, commercial, and light-industrial buildingsgenerally under 1,000 kW capacity), and benchmarked the prospects for significant market impacts over the next 57 years. This study serves as an update to EPRI's Assessment of Distributed Resource Technologies, completed in 1999 [EPRI 1999].

2005-01-23T23:59:59.000Z

365

Technology Review and Assessment of Distributed Energy Resources  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The investigators reviewed, benchmarked and assessed the current status of emerging battery technologies for distributed energy storage (DES) as it applies to market applications addressing residential, commercial, and light-industrial buildings, and the prospects for significant market impacts with in the electric utility sector over the next 5-7 years.

2006-02-06T23:59:59.000Z

366

ORISE: Inter-rater Reliability brings Standardization to Scientific Peer  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standardization of Scientific Peer Reviews Standardization of Scientific Peer Reviews IRR: A New Initiative Aims to Bring Standardization to ORISE Scientific Peer Reviews In some peer reviews, clear instructions on the basis for rating proposals may not be given to reviewers. As a result, the reviewers' final ratings can leave much room for interpretation thanks to varying degrees of reviewer knowledge and experience... all of which contribute to the final rating number. For instance, the rating scale for a particular review is 1 to 5 (with 1 being the highest). One reviewer rates the proposal a 2, and a second reviewer rates the same proposal a 4 but notes "this is the best proposal" he's ever seen. If the proposal was the best ever, why didn't he rate the proposal a 1? And, was the range in their scores due

367

DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS 235:17381752, 2006 REVIEWSA PEER REVIEWED FORUM Molecular Genetic Cascades for External Genitalia Formation: An Emerging  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

External genitalia are anatomical structures located at the posterior embryonic region as part of several urogenital/reproductive organs. The embryonic anlage of the external genitalia, the genital tubercle (GT) develops as a bud-shaped structure with an initial urethral plate and later urethra. Embryonic external genitalia are considered to be one of the appendages. Recent experiments suggest that essential regulatory genes possess similar functions for the outgrowth regulation of the GT and limb appendages. The transient embryonic epithelia located in the distal GT are called the distal urethral epithelium (DUE) regulating, at least in part, the (distal) GT development. This review covers the available data about early patterning of GT and discusses the molecular developmental similarities and points of divergence between the different appendages. Development of the male and female external genitalia is also reviewed. Developmental Dynamics

H. Kataoka; A. Kuroiwa; Y. Chen

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

NREL: Energy Analysis - Geothermal Results - Life Cycle Assessment Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Geothermal Results - Life Cycle Assessment Review Geothermal Results - Life Cycle Assessment Review For more information, visit: Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation: Geothermal Energy OpenEI: Data, Visualization, and Bibliographies Chart that shows life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for geothermal technologies. For help reading this chart, please contact the webmaster. Estimates of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from geothermal power generation Credit: Goldstein, B., G. Hiriart, R. Bertani, C. Bromley, L. Gutiérrez-Negrín, E. Huenges, H. Muraoka, A. Ragnarsson, J. Tester, V. Zui, 2011: Geothermal Energy. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation [O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow (eds)], Cambridge University Press. Figure 4.6 Enlarge image

369

For Peer Review - Optimization Online  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Mar 15, 2008 ... Here T(q, ?q) denotes the total kinetic, and V (q) the total smooth potential energy of the system. The controls is introduced into the equations of...

370

Literature Review and Assessment of Plant and Animal Transfer Factors Used in Performance Assessment Modeling  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A literature review and assessment was conducted by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to update information on plant and animal radionuclide transfer factors used in performance-assessment modeling. A group of 15 radionuclides was included in this review and assessment. The review is composed of four main sections, not including the Introduction. Section 2.0 provides a review of the critically important issue of physicochemical speciation and geochemistry of the radionuclides in natural soil-water systems as it relates to the bioavailability of the radionuclides. Section 3.0 provides an updated review of the parameters of importance in the uptake of radionuclides by plants, including root uptake via the soil-groundwater system and foliar uptake due to overhead irrigation. Section 3.0 also provides a compilation of concentration ratios (CRs) for soil-to-plant uptake for the 15 selected radionuclides. Section 4.0 provides an updated review on radionuclide uptake data for animal products related to absorption, homeostatic control, approach to equilibration, chemical and physical form, diet, and age. Compiled transfer coefficients are provided for cows milk, sheeps milk, goats milk, beef, goat meat, pork, poultry, and eggs. Section 5.0 discusses the use of transfer coefficients in soil, plant, and animal modeling using regulatory models for evaluating radioactive waste disposal or decommissioned sites. Each section makes specific suggestions for future research in its area.

Robertson, David E.; Cataldo, Dominic A.; Napier, Bruce A.; Krupka, Kenneth M.; Sasser, Lyle B.

2003-07-20T23:59:59.000Z

371

Basin-Scale Opportunity Assessment Initiative Background Literature Review  

SciTech Connect

As called for in the March 24, 2010, Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Hydropower, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), environmental stakeholders, and the hydropower industry are collaborating to identify opportunities to simultaneously increase electricity generation and improve environmental services in river basins of the United States. New analytical tools provide an improved ability to understand, model, and visualize environmental and hydropower systems. Efficiencies and opportunities that might not be apparent in site-by-site analyses can be revealed through assessments at the river-basin scale. Information from basin-scale assessments could lead to better coordination of existing hydropower projects, or to inform siting decisions (e.g., balancing the removal of some dams with the construction of others), in order to meet renewable energy production and environmental goals. Basin-scale opportunity assessments would inform energy and environmental planning and address the cumulative effects of hydropower development and operations on river basin environmental quality in a way that quantifies energy-environment tradeoffs. Opportunity assessments would create information products, develop scenarios, and identify specific actions that agencies, developers, and stakeholders can take to locate new sustainable hydropower projects, increase the efficiency and environmental performance of existing projects, and restore and protect environmental quality in our nation's river basins. Government agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGO) have done significant work to understand and assess opportunities for both hydropower and environmental protection at the basin scale. Some initiatives have been successful, others less so, and there is a need to better understand the legacy of work on which this current project can build. This background literature review is intended to promote that understanding. The literature review begins with a discussion in Section 2.0 of the Federal regulatory processes and mission areas pertaining to hydropower siting and licensing at the basin scale. This discussion of regulatory processes and mission areas sets the context for the next topic in Section 3.0, past and ongoing basin-scale hydropower planning and assessment activities. The final sections of the literature review provide some conclusions about past and ongoing basin-scale activities and their relevance to the current basin-scale opportunity assessment (Section 4.0), and a bibliography of existing planning and assessment documents (Section 5.0).

Saulsbury, Bo [ORNL; Geerlofs, Simon H. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL); Cada, Glenn F [ORNL; Bevelhimer, Mark S [ORNL

2010-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

Basin-Scale Opportunity Assessment Initiative Background Literature Review  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

As called for in the March 24, 2010, Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Hydropower, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), environmental stakeholders, and the hydropower industry are collaborating to identify opportunities to simultaneously increase electricity generation and improve environmental services in river basins of the United States. New analytical tools provide an improved ability to understand, model, and visualize environmental and hydropower systems. Efficiencies and opportunities that might not be apparent in site-by-site analyses can be revealed through assessments at the river-basin scale. Information from basin-scale assessments could lead to better coordination of existing hydropower projects, or to inform siting decisions (e.g., balancing the removal of some dams with the construction of others), in order to meet renewable energy production and environmental goals. Basin-scale opportunity assessments would inform energy and environmental planning and address the cumulative effects of hydropower development and operations on river basin environmental quality in a way that quantifies energy-environment tradeoffs. Opportunity assessments would create information products, develop scenarios, and identify specific actions that agencies, developers, and stakeholders can take to locate new sustainable hydropower projects, increase the efficiency and environmental performance of existing projects, and restore and protect environmental quality in our nation's river basins. Government agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGO) have done significant work to understand and assess opportunities for both hydropower and environmental protection at the basin scale. Some initiatives have been successful, others less so, and there is a need to better understand the legacy of work on which this current project can build. This background literature review is intended to promote that understanding. The literature review begins with a discussion in Section 2.0 of the Federal regulatory processes and mission areas pertaining to hydropower siting and licensing at the basin scale. This discussion of regulatory processes and mission areas sets the context for the next topic in Section 3.0, past and ongoing basin-scale hydropower planning and assessment activities. The final sections of the literature review provide some conclusions about past and ongoing basin-scale activities and their relevance to the current basin-scale opportunity assessment (Section 4.0), and a bibliography of existing planning and assessment documents (Section 5.0).

Saulsbury, Bo [ORNL; Geerlofs, Simon H. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL); Cada, Glenn F [ORNL; Bevelhimer, Mark S [ORNL

2010-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

Lightweight privacy-preserving peer-to-peer data integration  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Peer Data Management Systems (PDMS) are an attractive solution for managing distributed heterogeneous information. When a peer (client) requests data from another peer (server) with a different schema, translations of the query and its answer are done ...

Ye Zhang; Wai-Kit Wong; S. M. Yiu; Nikos Mamoulis; David W. Cheung

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

SQA Site Assessments and Criteria Review and Approach Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SQA Site Assessments and Criteria Review and Approach Documents SQA Site Assessments and Criteria Review and Approach Documents DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for use with 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, was issued June 17. 2005. This Guide, referred to as the DOE Safety Software Quality Assurance (SSQA) Guide, includes Appendix F, a Criteria Review and Approach Document (CRAD) associated with the SSQA requirements in DOE O 414.1C. The criteria in the CRAD apply to all safety software regardless of the safety software definition or software type (acquired or custom). The Lines of Inquiry associated with the CRAD should be customized to fit the DOE approved graded approach and ASME NQA-1-2000 or a standard with an equivalent level of SQA requirements approved by DOE. Since the graded approach and standard(s) approved can vary from site-to-site, there is no single set of Lines of Inquiry that could be developed that would be applicable to all sites.

375

Protocol EM-HQ Review Field Self Assessment Site Specific QAP-QIP February  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM-HQ Review Field Self Assessment Site Specific QAP-QIP EM-HQ Review Field Self Assessment Site Specific QAP-QIP February 2010 Protocol EM-HQ Review Field Self Assessment Site Specific QAP-QIP February 2010 This memorandum serves to transmit the Protocol for EM Review/Field Self-Assessment of Site-Specific QAP/QIP. The subject document is developed as part of continued efforts to ensure technical consistency, transparency, and clarity of QA requirements and expectations. Protocol EM-HQ Review Field Self Assessment Site Specific QAP-QIP February 2010 More Documents & Publications Protocol for EM Review/Field Self-Assessment of Site-Specific QAPs/QIPs Protocol for EM Review/Field Self-Assessment of Site Specific Quality Assurance Programs/Quality Implementation Plans SOPP-43, EM-23 Quality Assurance Oversight

376

File Marshal: Automatic extraction of peer-to-peer data  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Digital forensic investigators often find peer-to-peer, or file sharing, software present on the computers, or the images of the disks, that they examine. Investigators must first determine what P2P software is present and where the associated information ... Keywords: File sharing, Forensics, LimeWire, P2P, Peer-to-peer

Frank Adelstein; Robert A. Joyce

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

Advances In Peer-To-Peer Content Search  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Peer-to-peer (P2P) computer networks have recently received tremendous attention due to their inherent scalability and flexibility, which facilitates a broad spectrum of innovative multimedia applications. Such networks rely on the power of participant ... Keywords: Content search, Peer-to-peer

Madjid Merabti; Zhu Liu; Heather Yu; Deepa Kundur

2010-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

378

Management and organizational assessments: a review of selected organizations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report is part of a larger project designed to assist the NRC in its responsibilities for assessing the management and organization of utilities applying for an operating license for a nuclear power plant. This report reviews the processes and criteria used by other organizations that conduct management and organization audits and evaluations. It was undertaken in order to provide data and a basis for future analysis by taking a comparative perspective. When considering changes in criteria and procedures as the NRC is doing, a standard benchmark is the performance of other organizations that are similarly situated. It was our goal to directly inform the NRC about the activities of other organizations so that a reconsideration of NRC activities could benefit from the perspective of organizations with a longer, broader, and different experience than the NRC has in the management and organization area. Data collected for this report has provided useful information in designing organization and administration guidelines and assessment procedures for consideration by the NRC.

Nadel, M.V.; Kerwin, C.M.

1984-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

PeerMon: a peer-to-peer network monitoring system  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We present PeerMon, a peer-to-peer resource monitoring system for general purpose Unix local area network (LAN) systems. PeerMon is designed to monitor system resources on a single LAN, but it also could be deployed on several LANs where some inter-LAN ...

Tia Newhall; Janis Libeks; Ross Greenwood; Jeff Knerr

2010-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

380

2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review 2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review 2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review The 2013 Department of Energy (DOE) Building Technologies Office Program Review was held April 2-4, 2013 in Washington, DC. This inaugural review encompassed active work done by the Building Technologies Office (BTO), with a total of 59 individual activities reviewed. Sixty independent experts assessed the progress and contributions of each project toward BTO's mission and goals, and these assessments will be used to enhance the management of existing efforts, gauge the effectiveness of projects, and design future programs. The meeting also provided an opportunity to promote collaborations, partnerships, and technology transfers. 2013 Program Peer Review Report | 2013 Program Peer Review Presentations

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Review of Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) Assessments for the DOE Hanford Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this review is to assess the need for updating Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) assessments for the DOE's Hanford Site, as required by DOE Order 420.1B Chapter IV, Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation, based on significant changes in state-of-the-art NPH assessment methodology or site-specific information. This review is an update and expansion to the September 2010 review of PNNL-19751, Review of Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) Assessments for the Hanford 200 Areas (Non-Seismic).

Snow, Robert L.; Ross, Steven B.

2011-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

382

Wellness Peer Program Volunteer Job Description Wellness Peer Programs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Wellness Peer Program Volunteer Job Description Wellness Peer Programs: Leave The Pack Behind & Wellness Centre, UTSC Mental Wellness ­ mental health awareness program focusing on mental health, coping on healthy relationships, sexually transmitted infections and birth control Health & Wellness Centre

Kronzucker, Herbert J.

383

Introductory materials for committee members: 1) instructions for the Los Alamos National Laboratory fiscal year 2010 capability reviews 2) NPAC strategic capability planning 3) Summary self-assessment for the nuclear and particle physics, astrophysics an  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) uses external peer review to measure and continuously improve the quality of its science, technology and engineering (STE). LANL uses capability reviews to assess the STE quality and institutional integration and to advise Laboratory Management on the current and future health of the STE. Capability reviews address the STE integration that LANL uses to meet mission requirements. STE capabilities are define to cut across directorates providing a more holistic view of the STE quality, integration to achieve mission requirements, and mission relevance. The scope of these capabilities necessitate that there will be significant overlap in technical areas covered by capability reviews (e.g., materials research and weapons science and engineering). In addition, LANL staff may be reviewed in different capability reviews because of their varied assignments and expertise. LANL plans to perform a complete review of the Laboratory's STE capabilities (hence staff) in a three-year cycle. The principal product of an external review is a report that includes the review committee's assessments, commendations, and recommendations for STE. The Capability Review Committees serve a dual role of providing assessment of the Laboratory's technical contributions and integration towards its missions and providing advice to Laboratory Management. The assessments and advice are documented in reports prepared by the Capability Review Committees that are delivered to the Director and to the Principal Associate Director for Science, Technology and Engineering (PADSTE). This report will be used by Laboratory Management for STE assessment and planning. The report is also provided to the Department of Energy (DOE) as part of LANL's Annual Performance Plan and to the Los Alamos National Security (LANS) LLC's Science and Technology Committee (STC) as part of its responsibilities to the LANS Board of Governors.

Redondo, Antonio [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

Workplace Peers and Entrepreneurship  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We examine whether the likelihood of entrepreneurial activity is related to the prior career experiences of an individual's coworkers, using a unique matched employer--employee panel data set. We argue that coworkers can increase the likelihood that ... Keywords: entrepreneurship, organizational studies, peers, personnel

Ramana Nanda; Jesper B. Srensen

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in the review: Langdon Holton has over 35 years experience in radiochemical process engineering and operations, nuclear fuel reprocessing, waste separations and treatment and...

386

Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Criteria, Review and Approach Document DNFSB Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board DOE U.S. Department of Energy MNF Manzano Nuclear Facility OFI Opportunity for Improvement...

387

Diurnal Availability for Peer-to-Peer Systems  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This paper discusses an efficient approach to design and implement a highly available peer- to-peer system irrespective of peer timing and churn. Although peers in P2P system join or leave at whim, it has been found that most of the peers follow diurnal pattern of availability governed by the time of day effect. When considering a global P2P system, the cyclic behavior of peers situated on diff?erent time zones can be found complementary of one another. Our approach utilizes the diurnal pattern of globally dispersed peers to develop a grouping strategy. The objective of each group is to ensure 24x7 data availability within the group. To represent availability pattern we propose to divide 24 hours of a day into multiple slots and then to express the availability of a particular peer in each slot. In our approach, each peer collects slot availability information of a number of peers and forms small groups of 4 to 8 peers in such a way that the combined availability in each slot within a group is close to 100%. ...

Shahriar, Nashid; Ahmed, Reaz; Boutaba, Raouf

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

Hybrid vehicle potential assessment. Volume 7. Hybrid vehicle review  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Review of hybrid vehicles (HVs) built during the past ten years or planned to be built in the near future is presented. An attempt is made to classify and analyze these vehicles to get an overall picture of their key characteristics. The review includes on-road hybrid passenger cars, trucks, vans, and buses.

Leschly, K.O.

1979-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

389

Balancing Peer and Server Energy Consumption in Large Peer-to-Peer File Distribution Systems  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Balancing Peer and Server Energy Consumption in Large Peer-to-Peer File Distribution Systems. This paper investigates the most energy efficient way to distribute a file to a large number of recipients] has been paid to its energy consumption. This paper considers large scale file distribution

Andrew, Lachlan

390

Section_701_Surveys_Reviews_and_Self-Assessments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

701 701 Surveys and Reviews Description This section describes the programs and procedures in effect at Headquarters (HQ) to conduct Safeguards and Security (S&S) surveys and reviews. These activities are conducted to assure the Secretary of Energy, Departmental elements, and other government agencies that safeguards and security interests are being protected at the required level. The Office of Information Security (HS-92) is responsible for the conduct of all surveys and reviews of HQ facilities. It is also responsible for conducting an annual survey of overall HQ security operations. The HQ Survey Team has been established within HS-92 to carry out these surveys and review activities. Types and Frequencies of Surveys and Reviews:

391

Review of the Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Disposition Project September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health,...

392

Review of Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) Assessments for the Hanford 200 Areas (Non-Seismic)  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this review is to assess the need for updating Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) assessments for the Hanford 200 Areas, as required by DOE Order 420.1B Chapter IV, Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation, based on significant changes in state-of-the-art NPH assessment methodology or site-specific information. The review includes all natural phenomena hazards with the exception of seismic/earthquake hazards, which are being addressed under a separate effort. It was determined that existing non-seismic NPH assessments are consistent with current design methodology and site specific data.

Snow, Robert L.; Ross, Steven B.; Sullivan, Robin S.

2010-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

393

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Review to Assess Black Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:15pm Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment facility that contain tanks and piping. Due to high levels of

394

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact 202-586-4940 WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment

395

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:15pm Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment facility that contain tanks and piping. Due to high levels of

396

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact 202-586-4940 WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment

397

Surry Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Pilot Plant Review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and the American Nuclear Society (ANS) have developed the "Standard for Level 1/Large Early Release Frequency Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications." The objective of the standard is to provide basic requirements for performing probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs) that would support future risk-informed decisions. The standard limits its requirements to performing a Level 1 analysis of the core damage frequency and a limite...

2010-07-16T23:59:59.000Z

398

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Solution for Smart Grid Renewable Energy Applications - Sheri Nevins, Raytheon & Ron Moss, EnerVault  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012, Raytheon Proprietary and EnerVault Corporation, All Rights Reserved. 2012, Raytheon Proprietary and EnerVault Corporation, All Rights Reserved. 1 Sheri Nevins Raytheon Ktech Ron Mosso EnerVault Corporation DEMONSTRATION OF ENERGY STORAGE USING A BREAKTHROUGH REDOX FLOW BATTERY TECHNOLOGY v. 1-0 Copyright ©2012, Raytheon Proprietary and EnerVault Corporation, All Rights Reserved. 2 Disclaimer This material is partially based upon work supported by NYSERDA under PON1200 Project 15880 NYSERDA has not reviewed the information contained herein, and the opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York. This material is partially based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-OE0000225. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States

399

iPlane Nano: Path Prediction for Peer-to-Peer Applications Harsha V. Madhyastha  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

iPlane Nano: Path Prediction for Peer-to-Peer Applications Harsha V. Madhyastha Ethan Katz present the design and implementa- tion of iPlane Nano, a library for delivering Internet path information to peer-to-peer applications. iPlane Nano is itself a peer-to-peer application, and scales to a large

Krishnamurthy, Arvind

400

White Paper: A Survey of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Technologies Page 1 of 1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

White Paper: A Survey of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Technologies Page 1 of 1 Athens University Technologies White Paper WHP-2002-03 #12;White Paper: A Survey of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Technologies Page 2 of 2 A Survey of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Technologies White Paper Written by Stephanos Androutsellis

Lu, Paul

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Introducing artificial evolution into peer-to-peer networks with the distributed remodeling framework  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A peer-to-peer (P2P) network is a complex system whose elements (peer nodes, or simply peers) cooperate to implement scalable distributed services. From a general point of view, the activities of a P2P system are consequences of external inputs coming ... Keywords: Artificial evolution, Complex adaptive system, Peer-to-peer network

Michele Amoretti

2013-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

Echelon: Peer-to-Peer Network Diagnosis with Network Coding  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to minutes or even hours are still valuable. However, such historical and delay-tolerant observations should a historical period of time is referred to as a diagnosis. In this paper, we present Echelon, a time streaming rate, the number of upstream and downstream peers, the latency to neighbor peers, and resource

Li, Baochun

403

Inadvertent File Sharing Over Peer-to-Peer Networks  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Chairman Waxman, Ranking Member Davis, and members of the committee, it is an honor to testify before you today about this important national security issue. Peer-to-peer (P2P) software clients have become part of the standard suite of PC applications for many users. With millions of users world-wide sharing music, video,

unknown authors

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Jalapeno: secentralized grid computing using peer-to-peer technology  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper presents the Jalapeno grid computing system. Jalapeno is implemented in Java and uses peer-to-peer technology provided by Project JXTA. The Jalapeno system consists of manager, worker and task submitter hosts. The task submitter submits a ... Keywords: GRID, P2P, distributed computing

Niklas Therning; Lars Bengtsson

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

The state of peer-to-peer network simulators  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Networking research often relies on simulation in order to test and evaluate new ideas. An important requirement of this process is that results must be reproducible so that other researchers can replicate, validate, and extend existing work. We look ... Keywords: P2P, Peer-to-peer, simulator evaluation, simulator usage

Anirban Basu, Simon Fleming, James Stanier, Stephen Naicken, Ian Wakeman, Vijay K. Gurbani

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

Designing a Peer-to-Peer Wireless Network Confederation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We present the Peer-to-Peer Wireless Network Confederation (P2PWNC), a P2P system designed to enable the sharing of WLAN bandwidth among residential hotspots. The benefits of joining the Confederation outweigh the costs, and its token-based incentive mechanism prevents free-riding.

Elias Efstathiou And; Elias C. Efstathiou; George C. Polyzos

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Review of the Oconee-3 probabilistic risk assessment: external events, core damage frequency. Volume 2  

SciTech Connect

A review of the Oconee-3 Probabilistic Risk Assessment (OPRA) was conducted with the broad objective of evaluating qualitatively and quantitatively (as much as possible) the OPRA assessment of the important sequences that are ''externally'' generated and lead to core damage. The review included a technical assessment of the assumptions and methods used in the OPRA within its stated objective and with the limited information available. Within this scope, BNL performed a detailed reevaluation of the accident sequences generated by internal floods and earthquakes and a less detailed review (in some cases a scoping review) for the accident sequences generated by fires, tornadoes, external floods, and aircraft impact. 12 refs., 24 figs., 31 tabs.

Hanan, N.A.; Ilberg, D.; Xue, D.; Youngblood, R.; Reed, J.W.; McCann, M.; Talwani, T.; Wreathall, J.; Kurth, P.D.; Bandyopadhyay, K.

1986-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

Facility Representative Program Assessment Criteria, Review, and Approach Document (CRAD)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

STD-1063-2011 STD-1063-2011 Appendix B B-1 FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT GUIDE The DOE has implemented its FR Program, and is looking to continuously improve the program's effectiveness DOE-wide. An effective FR Program has many elements, as described in this Standard. These elements are intended to yield a program that provides DOE facilities with well-trained FRs who spend appropriate amounts of time in their facilities and can work effectively with their contractor management counterparts. The program, to be effective, needs the functional support of management. To maintain the continued support of DOE management, the FR program needs to demonstrate its continued performance and effectiveness, which is to be assessed periodically using

409

Review of the Argonne National Laboratory Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility Readiness Assessment (Implementation Verification Review Sections), Novvember 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility Readiness Assessment (Implementation Verification Review Sections) May 2011 November 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1

410

A Key Review On Exergetic Analysis And Assessment Of Renewable Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Review On Exergetic Analysis And Assessment Of Renewable Energy Review On Exergetic Analysis And Assessment Of Renewable Energy Resources For A Sustainable Future Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Journal Article: A Key Review On Exergetic Analysis And Assessment Of Renewable Energy Resources For A Sustainable Future Details Activities (0) Areas (0) Regions (0) Abstract: Energy resources and their utilization intimately relate to sustainable development. In attaining sustainable development, increasing the energy efficiencies of processes utilizing sustainable energy resources plays an important role. The utilization of renewable energy offers a wide range of exceptional benefits. There is also a link between exergy and sustainable development. A sustainable energy system may be regarded as a

411

A review of NRC staff uses of probabilistic risk assessment  

SciTech Connect

The NRC staff uses probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and risk management as important elements its licensing and regulatory processes. In October 1991, the NRC`s Executive Director for Operations established the PRA Working Group to address concerns identified by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards with respect to unevenness and inconsistency in the staff`s current uses of PRA. After surveying current staff uses of PRA and identifying needed improvements, the Working Group defined a set of basic principles for staff PRA use and identified three areas for improvements: guidance development, training enhancements, and PRA methods development. For each area of improvement, the Working Group took certain actions and recommended additional work. The Working Group recommended integrating its work with other recent PRA-related activities the staff completed and improving staff interactions with PRA users in the nuclear industry. The Working Group took two key actions by developing general guidance for two uses of PRA within the NRC (that is, screening or prioritizing reactor safety issues and analyzing such issues in detail) and developing guidance on basic terms and methods important to the staff`s uses of PRA.

Not Available

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

412

Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations, January 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review of the Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 2

413

A Role-Based Trust Model for Peer-to-Peer Communities and Dynamic Coalitions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Although P2P systems are usually used for informationexchange between peers, they have either protectedpeers' anonymity, or required transacting peers to trusteach other implicitly. Both these approaches arevulnerable to attacks by malicious peers who ... Keywords: Communities, Dynamic Coalitions, Peer-to-Peer, Trust

Mujtaba Khambatti; Partha Dasgupta; Kyung Dong Ryu

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Session II: Brett Amidan, Bharat Bhargava, Ning Zhou Session III: Ken Martin, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session IV: Jeff Dagle, Jim Dyer, Joe Gracia, Joe Eto Session...

415

2013 Buiulding Technologies Office Program Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Photo Credits Photo Credits (top to bottom) 1. Multifamily apartment building; photo courtesy of istock.com. 2. Zero-energy single family home; photo courtesy of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, images.nrel.gov, image 6310910. 3. Office building; photo courtesy of istock.com. 4. View of researcher using Linked-View Parallel Coordinate Plot Renderer software to analyze DOE's Roof Savings Calculator data on Oak Ridge National Laboratory's (ORNL's) Exploratory Visual Environment for Research in Science and Technology (EVEREST): photo courtesy of ORNL. 5. Sandia Cooler; photo courtesy of Sandia National Laboratories. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

416

Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Denver Marriott West Golden, Colorado AGENDA Tuesday, November 2, 2010 8:00 am Registration and Continental Breakfast 9:00 am-9:10 am Welcome Dr. Robert Hawsey, Associate Laboratory Director for Renewable Electricity and End Use Systems, US DOE-National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9:10 am-9:25 am Overview of Smart Grid Program Eric Lightner, U.S. Department of Energy 9:25 am-9:40 am Overview of Smart Grid Research and Development Activities Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy Moderator - Merrill Smith, U.S. Department of Energy 9:40 am-10:10 am University of Hawaii Renewable and Distributed Systems Jay Griffin, University of Hawaii 10:10 am-10:40 am Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System Dennis Sumner, City of Fort Collins

417

WESTCARB IEA 2008 Peer Review Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Water C.W. Cond. Fuel Processing Plant Crude Fuel Air Separation Plant Air N 2 Coal, Refinery Residues, or Biomass NG, Oil or Landfill Gas HP IP LP O 2 F u e l * CO 2 Recovery...

418

AVIAN/WIND STATISTICAL PEER REVIEW PROJECT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

interdisciplinaire »44 . En effet, il ne s'agit pas seulement d'interdisciplinarité au sein des sciences humaines les mutations du métier, les statuts du déchet 44 Je tiens l'expression de Sabine Barles. 45 Voir

419

PEER REVIEW Advanced Thermal Processing Alternatives  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. The capital cost of a coal gasification combined-cycle power plant (without CO2 separation) is estimated estimates are in development. Sequestration of carbon dioxide may mandate the location of gasification power Bank, 1998). Economics The cost of power from a coal gasification power plant is comprised of capital

Columbia University

420

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Thermoelectrochemical Energy Storage ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability. Thermoelectrochemical Energy Storage Problem: Flow batteries exhibit inefficiencies that are affected by...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Peer Review Improves Undergraduate Science Writing Skills  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

a. ) Does the discussion follow a logical order? (b. ) Doa. ) Does the discussion follow a logical order? (b. ) Do

Conte, Debra

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

2013 Buiulding Technologies Office Program Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Photo Credits Photo Credits (top to bottom) 1. Multifamily apartment building; photo courtesy of istock.com. 2. Zero-energy single family home; photo courtesy of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, images.nrel.gov, image 6310910. 3. Office building; photo courtesy of istock.com. 4. View of researcher using Linked-View Parallel Coordinate Plot Renderer software to analyze DOE's Roof Savings Calculator data on Oak Ridge National Laboratory's (ORNL's) Exploratory Visual Environment for Research in Science and Technology (EVEREST): photo courtesy of ORNL. 5. Sandia Cooler; photo courtesy of Sandia National Laboratories. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

423

2003 Peered Reviewed Archival Publications Chemical Engineering  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Corrosion condition evaluation at Muddy Creek Bridge. Technical Note. Journal of Performance of Constructed* , Y. and M. Jaraiedi. 2003. Enhancing the intelligent time series forecasting with a monitoring. Feliachi. 2003. Thermal aging prediction of transformer oil and PVC of high voltage cables using neural

Mohaghegh, Shahab

424

Mangla Dam Raising Project (Pakistan): General Review and Socio-Spatial Impact Assessment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Mangla Dam Raising Project (Pakistan): General Review and Socio-Spatial Impact Assessment Saheeb, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad-44000, Pakistan saheebk@ceme.nust.edu.pk Abstract. INTRODUCTION Pakistan has recently successfully completed the raising of Mangla dam, a major water works system

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

425

Radiological performance assessment for the E-Area Vaults Disposal Facility. Appendices A through M  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

These document contains appendices A-M for the performance assessment. They are A: details of models and assumptions, B: computer codes, C: data tabulation, D: geochemical interactions, E: hydrogeology of the Savannah River Site, F: software QA plans, G: completeness review guide, H: performance assessment peer review panel recommendations, I: suspect soil performance analysis, J: sensitivity/uncertainty analysis, K: vault degradation study, L: description of naval reactor waste disposal, M: porflow input file. (GHH)

Cook, J.R.

1994-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

426

Life Cycle Assessment of Pavements: A Critical Review of Existing Literature and Research  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides a critical review of existing literature and modeling tools related to life-cycle assessment (LCA) applied to pavements. The review finds that pavement LCA is an expanding but still limited research topic in the literature, and that the existing body of work exhibits methodological deficiencies and incompatibilities that serve as barriers to the widespread utilization of LCA by pavement engineers and policy makers. This review identifies five key issues in the current body of work: inconsistent functional units, improper system boundaries, imbalanced data for asphalt and cement, use of limited inventory and impact assessment categories, and poor overall utility. This review also identifies common data and modeling gaps in pavement LCAs that should be addressed in future work. These gaps include: the use phase (rolling resistance, albedo, carbonation, lighting, leachate, and tire wear and emissions), asphalt fumes, feedstock energy of bitumen, traffic delay, the maintenance phase, and the end-of-life phase. This review concludes with a comprehensive list of recommendations for future research, which shed light on where improvements in knowledge can be made that will benefit the accuracy and comprehensiveness of pavement LCAs moving forward.

Santero, Nicholas; Masanet, Eric; Horvath, Arpad

2010-04-20T23:59:59.000Z

427

Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) R&D Program: US Geothermal Resources Review and Needs Assessment  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to lay the groundwork for an emerging process to assess U.S. geothermal resources that might be suitable for development as Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). Interviews of leading geothermists indicate that doing that will be intertwined with updating assessments of U.S. higher-quality hydrothermal resources and reviewing methods for discovering ''hidden'' hydrothermal and EGS resources. The report reviews the history and status of assessment of high-temperature geothermal resources in the United States. Hydrothermal, Enhanced, and Hot Dry Rock resources are addressed. Geopressured geothermal resources are not. There are three main uses of geothermal resource assessments: (1) They inform industry and other interest parties of reasonable estimates of the amounts and likely locations of known and prospective geothermal resources. This provides a basis for private-sector decisions whether or not to enter the geothermal energy business at all, and for where to look for useful resources. (2) They inform government agencies (Federal, State, local) of the same kinds of information. This can inform strategic decisions, such as whether to continue to invest in creating and stimulating a geothermal industry--e.g., through research or financial incentives. And it informs certain agencies, e.g., Department of Interior, about what kinds of tactical operations might be required to support such activities as exploration and leasing. (3) They help the experts who are performing the assessment(s) to clarify their procedures and data, and in turn, provide the other two kinds of users with a more accurate interpretation of what the resulting estimates mean. The process of conducting this assessment brings a spotlight to bear on what has been accomplished in the domain of detecting and understanding reservoirs, in the period since the last major assessment was conducted.

Entingh, Dan; McLarty, Lynn

2000-11-30T23:59:59.000Z

428

Final Review of Safety Assessment Issues at Savannah River Site, August 2011  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

At the request of Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) management, a review team composed of experts in atmospheric transport modeling for environmental radiation dose assessment convened at the Savannah River Site (SRS) on August 29-30, 2011. Though the meeting was prompted initially by suspected issues related to the treatment of surface roughness inherent in the SRS meteorological dataset and its treatment in the MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System Version 2 (MACCS2), various topical areas were discussed that are relevant to performing safety assessments at SRS; this final report addresses these topical areas.

Napier, Bruce A.; Rishel, Jeremy P.; Bixler, Nathan E.

2011-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

429

Review of the independent risk assessment of the proposed Cabrillo liquified natural gas deepwater port project.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In March 2005, the United States Coast Guard requested that Sandia National Laboratories provide a technical review and evaluation of the appropriateness and completeness of models, assumptions, analyses, and risk management options presented in the Cabrillo Port LNG Deepwater Port Independent Risk Assessment-Revision 1 (Cabrillo Port IRA). The goal of Sandia's technical evaluation of the Cabrillo Port IRA was to assist the Coast Guard in ensuring that the hazards to the public and property from a potential LNG spill during transfer, storage, and regasification operations were appropriately evaluated and estimated. Sandia was asked to review and evaluate the Cabrillo Port IRA results relative to the risk and safety analysis framework developed in the recent Sandia report, ''Guidance on Risk Analysis and Safety Implications of a Large Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Spill over Water''. That report provides a framework for assessing hazards and identifying approaches to minimize the consequences to people and property from an LNG spill over water. This report summarizes the results of the Sandia review of the Cabrillo Port IRA and supporting analyses. Based on our initial review, additional threat and hazard analyses, consequence modeling, and process safety considerations were suggested. The additional analyses recommended were conducted by the Cabrillo Port IRA authors in cooperation with Sandia and a technical review panel composed of representatives from the Coast Guard and the California State Lands Commission. The results from the additional analyses improved the understanding and confidence in the potential hazards and consequences to people and property from the proposed Cabrillo Port LNG Deepwater Port Project. The results of the Sandia review, the additional analyses and evaluations conducted, and the resolutions of suggested changes for inclusion in a final Cabrillo Port IRA are summarized in this report.

Gritzo, Louis Alan; Hightower, Marion Michael; Covan, John Morgan; Luketa-Hanlin, Anay Josephine

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

430

Under consideration for publication in Knowledge and Information Systems Expertise-based Peer Selection in Peer-to-Peer  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

is a problem for full-text searching. To be specific, in a document sharing case, one could roughly do two of this approach in the domain of full-text searches, is what information a peer has to tell to another peer so ontology. We evaluate the model in a bibliographic scenario, where peers share bibliographic descriptions

van Harmelen, Frank

431

Peer-To-Peer Unstructured Anycasting Using Correlated Swarms  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

compared to search without caching. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2The terms community can be entered in the querying peer's primary finger table. The second search strategy employs for the success of any social-networking based application is the efficiency of search. In this paper, we propose

Konstantopoulos, Takis

432

Annual Performance Assessment and Composite Analysis Review for the ICDF Landfill FY 2008  

SciTech Connect

This report addresses low-level waste disposal operations at the Idaho Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Disposal Facility (ICDF) landfill from the start of operations in Fiscal Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2008. The ICDF was authorized in the Operable Unit 3-13 Record of Decision for disposal of waste from the Idaho National Laboratory Site CERCLA environmental restoration activities. The ICDF has been operating since 2003 in compliance with the CERCLA requirements and the waste acceptance criteria developed in the CERCLA process. In developing the Operable Unit 3-13 Record of Decision, U.S. Department of Energy Order (DOE) 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management', was identified as a 'to be considered' requirement for the ICDF. The annual review requirement under DOE Order 435.1 was determined to be an administrative requirement and, therefore, annual reviews were not prepared on an annual basis. However, the landfill has been operating for 5 years and, since the waste forms and inventories disposed of have changed from what was originally envisioned for the ICDF landfill, the ICDF project team has decided that this annual review is necessary to document the changes and provide a basis for any updates in analyses that may be necessary to continue to meet the substantive requirements of DOE Order 435.1. For facilities regulated under DOE Order 435.1-1, U.S. DOE Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management', IV.P.(4)(c) stipulates that annual summaries of low-level waste disposal operations shall be prepared with respect to the conclusions and recommendations of the performance assessment and composite analysis. Important factors considered in this review include facility operations, waste receipts, and results from monitoring and research and development programs. There have been no significant changes in operations at the landfill in respect to the disposal geometry, the verification of waste characteristics, and the tracking of inventories against total limits that would affect the results and conclusions of the performance assessment. Waste receipts to date and projected waste receipts through Fiscal Year 2012 are both greater than the inventory assessed in the performance assessment and composite analysis. The waste forms disposed of to the landfill are different from the waste form (compacted soil) assessed in the performance assessment. The leak detection system and groundwater monitoring results indicate the landfill has not leaked. The results of the performance assessment/composite analysis are valid (i.e., there is still a reasonable expectation of meeting performance objectives) but the new information indicates less conservatism in the results than previously believed.

Karen Koslow Arthur Rood

2009-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

433

An optimal overlay topology for routing peer-to-peer searches  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Unstructured peer-to-peer networks are frequently used as the overlay in various middleware toolkits for emerging applications, from content discovery to query result caching to distributed collaboration. Often it is assumed that unstructured networks ... Keywords: overlay topology, peer-to-peer search, random walks

Brian F. Cooper

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

Dynamic TTL-Based Search in Unstructured Peer-to-Peer Networks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Resource discovery is a challenging issue in unstructured peer-to-peer networks. Blind search approaches, including flooding and random walks, are the two typical algorithms used in such systems. Blind flooding is not scalable because of its high communication ... Keywords: Unstructured Peer-to-Peer networks, Resource discovery, Dynamic-TTL, P2P computing

Imen Filali; Fabrice Huet

2010-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

A path-traceable query routing mechanism for search in unstructured peer-to-peer networks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Unstructured Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks have become a very popular architecture for content distribution in large-scale and dynamic environments. Searching for content in unstructured P2P networks is a challenging task because the distribution of objects ... Keywords: Dynamic network, Network topologies, Peer-to-peer (P2P), Query routing

Ming Xu; Shuigeng Zhou; Jihong Guan; Xiaohua Hu

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

436

Mutual anonymity protocol with integrity protection for mobile peer-to-peer networks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A mobile peer-to-peer network (MOPNET) has drawn increasing attentions for its communication convenience and ease of resource sharing in an unfixed infrastructure. The essential requirements for applications in a MOPNET are to enforce ... Keywords: MOPNET, integrity protection, mobile P2P networks, mobile networks, mutual anonymity, peer networks, peer-to-, security

Kuo-Yu Tsai; Chien-Lung Hsu; Tzong-Chen Wu

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

A peer-to-peer overlay approach for emergency mobile ad hoc network based multimedia communications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Overlay networks are located on top of the physical network and are generally favored for the implementation of peer-to-peer (P2P) networks providing services such as voice over IP (VoIP) communications. The operation of the overlay network results in ... Keywords: ad hoc networking, emergency, overlays, peer-to-peer

Grant P. Millar; Tipu A. Ramrekha; Christos Politis

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

An Interested-based Architecture for Peer-to-Peer Network Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Improving search performance is an important issue in peer-to-peer (P2P) network systems. Although Distributed Hash Tables (DHTs) route queries more efficiently than flooding does, it's complicated for DHTs to support keyword-based searches. Emerging ... Keywords: overlay networks, peer-to-peer networks,Interest groups

Wen-Tsuen Chen; Chi-Hong Chao; Jeng-Long Chiang

2006-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Managing data for evaluating trust in unstructured peer-to-peer networks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Managing data is a problem of particular importance in trust model of peer-to-peer environments where one frequently encounters unknown agents. Existing methods for data management, which are based on DHT or Random Selection, can not apply well in the ... Keywords: managing data, peer-to-peer, reputation, trust

Zhitang Li; Huaiqing Lin; Chuiwei Lu; Yejiang Zhang

2008-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

CERTS 2012 Program Review - Reliability Standards Analysis and Assessment - Gil Tam, EPG  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12-13, 2012 12-13, 2012 Washington, DC FY12 DOE/CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D Internal Program Review Research Projects Reliability Standards Analysis and Assessments  Frequency Response Event Collection and Analysis  NERC Interconnections 2011 Annual Grid Reliability Performance Analysis and Report Page 1 Reliability Standards Analysis and Assessment  Objective: Support the NERC committees/groups (Resource Subcommittee and RS- Frequency Working Group) in the following ways: - Perform grid reliability metrics analysis using data collected in CERTS applications as requested by the RS - Analyze collected data to assess reliability performance at different levels - Interconnection, Reliability Coordinator, Balancing Authority - Perform analysis, testing, and monitoring of current and proposed

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Merit Review of BER Activities at the DOE Laboratories | U.S...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policy Grants & Contracts Guidance Laboratory Scientific Focus Area...

442

Environment, Safety and Health Self-Assessment Report Fiscal Year 2010  

SciTech Connect

The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Self-Assessment Program was established to ensure that Integrated Safety Management (ISM) is implemented institutionally and by all divisions. The ES&H Self-Assessment Program, managed by the Office of Contractor Assurance (OCA), provides for an internal evaluation of all ES&H programs and systems at LBNL. The primary objective of the program is to ensure that work is conducted safely and with minimal negative impact to workers, the public, and the environment. Self-assessment follows the five core functions and guiding principles of ISM. Self-assessment is the mechanism used to promote the continuous improvement of the Laboratory's ES&H programs. The process is described in the Environment, Safety, and Health Assurance Plan (PUB-5344) and is composed of three types of self-assessments: Division ES&H Self-Assessment, ES&H Technical Assurance Program Assessment, and Division ES&H Peer Review. The Division ES&H Self-Assessment Manual (PUB-3105) provides the framework by which divisions conduct formal ES&H self-assessments to systematically identify program deficiencies. Issue-specific assessments are designed and implemented by the divisions and focus on areas of interest to division management. They may be conducted by teams and involve advance planning to ensure that appropriate resources are available. The ES&H Technical Assurance Program Manual (PUB-913E) provides the framework for systematic reviews of ES&H programs and processes. The ES&H Technical Assurance Program Assessment is designed to evaluate whether ES&H programs and processes are compliant with guiding regulations, are effective, and are properly implemented by LBNL divisions. The Division ES&H Peer Review Manual provides the framework by which division ISM systems are evaluated and improved. Peer Reviews are conducted by teams under the direction of senior division management and focus on higher-level management issues. Peer Review teams are selected on the basis of members knowledge and experience in the issues of interest to the division director. LBNL periodically requests in-depth independent assessments of selected ES&H programs. Such assessments augment LBNL's established assessment processes and provide an objective view of ES&H program effectiveness. Institutional Findings, Observations, and Noteworthy Practices identified during independent assessments are specifically intended to help LBNL identify opportunities for program improvement. This report includes the results of the Division ES&H Self-Assessment, ES&H Technical Assurance Program Assessment, and Division ES&H Peer Review, respectively.

Robinson, Scott

2011-03-23T23:59:59.000Z

443

EVALUATION OF THE FINAL REPORT: WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EVALUATION OF THE FINAL REPORT: WASTE EVALUATION OF THE FINAL REPORT: WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL B00000000-01717-5700-00005 REV 00 August 2002 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. QA: QA B00000000-01717-5700-00005 REV 00 August 2002 Evaluation of the Final Report: Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Panel Prepared by: Jack N. Bailey, Jack D. Cloud, Thomas E. Rodgers, and Tammy S.E. Summers Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office P.O. Box 364629 North Las Vegas, Nevada 89036-8629 Prepared by: Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC 1180 Town Center Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Under Contract Number DE-AC28-01RW12101 Disclaimer Signature Page Change History Acknowledgments

444

Panel results of the solar thermal program research requirement assessment review. Final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The objectives of the assessment were to identify: research needs by topic and activity, relative priority of research needs, options for performing needed research, potential performers, costs and duration of R and D activities, gaps and duplications within the R and D program, and activities underway that appear to be of low priority. To achieve these objectives, research programs of the Division of Solar Thermal Technologies within the Office of Renewable Energy and Conservation and the Materials and Advanced Energy Programs of the Office of Basic Energy Sciences were reviewed. Several recent assessments of solar thermal research needs made within the past two years by various groups were also reviewed, and the key research issues and needs were extracted. The primary results from the assessment are a set of prioritized activities to meet the most important research needs for solar thermal technologies. These activities belong to four disciplines: materials science, thermal science, thermochemistry, and engineering. Further, priorities associated with the needs for research result from the various activities allow the recommended activities to be grouped into two categories; a core group which should be at the heart of any future program developed by the department, and a set of important needs that should, at least, find their way into a program at some time during its existence. The recommended research program is outlined, and the complete set of ranked research needs is listed.

None

1983-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

Literature Review for the Baseline Knowledge Assessment of the Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies Program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The purpose of the Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies (HFCIT) Program Baseline Knowledge Assessment is to measure the current level of awareness and understanding of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies and the hydrogen economy. This information will be an asset to the HFCIT program in formulating an overall education plan. It will also provide a baseline for comparison with future knowledge and opinion surveys. To assess the current understanding and establish the baseline, the HFCIT program plans to conduct scientific surveys of four target audience groups--the general public, the educational community, governmental agencies, and potential large users. The purpose of the literature review is to examine the literature and summarize the results of surveys that have been conducted in the recent past concerning the existing knowledge and attitudes toward hydrogen. This literature review covers both scientific and, to a lesser extent, non-scientific polls. Seven primary data sources were reviewed, two of which were studies based in Europe. Studies involved both closed-end and open-end questions; surveys varied in length from three questions to multi-page interviews. Populations involved in the studies were primarily adults, although one study involved students. The number of participants ranged from 13 to over 16,000 per study. In addition to the primary surveys, additional related studies were mined for pertinent information. The primary conclusions of the surveys reviewed are that the public knows very little about hydrogen and fuel cell technologies but is generally accepting of the potential for hydrogen use. In general, respondents consider themselves as environmentally conscious. The public considers safety as the primary issue surrounding hydrogen as a fuel. Price, performance, and convenience are also considerations that will have major impacts on purchase decisions.

Truett, L.F.

2003-12-10T23:59:59.000Z

446

Habitat Evaluation: Guidance for the Review of Environmental Impact Assessment Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HABITAT EVALUATION: HABITAT EVALUATION: GUIDANCE FOR THE REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTS EPA Contract No. 68-C0-0070 work Assignments B-21, 1-12 January 1993 Submitted to: Jim Serfis U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Federal Activities 401 M Street, SW Washington, DC 20460 Submitted by: Mark Southerland Dynamac Corporation The Dynamac Building 2275 Research Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ... ...... .... ... ................................................. 1 Habitat Conservation .......................................... 2 Habitat Evaluation Methodology ................................... 2 Habitats of Concern ........................................... 3 Definition of Habitat ..................................... 4

447

Geothermal: a review of US geothermal activity and an assessment of the resource availability  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This review describes US geothermal activities and assesses resource availability. The future of geothermal activity in the US is uncertain due to slashes in the geothermal program at the US Department of Energy. The question is whether private industry will continue the geothermal exploration and development program. Major cutbacks in the federal budget are in areas designed to accelerate commercial development of hydrothermal energy. Basic research is still funded, at a lower cost level. Areas of research expected to pay off in the near future include drilling technology, well stimulation, energy conversion, and end materials.

Friedlander, A.F.

1981-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

448

Safety System Oversight Program Assessment Criteria and Review Approach Document (CRAD), Revision 0  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of 7 of 7 Safety System Oversight (SSO) Program Implementation Assessment Criteria and Review Approach Documents (CRADs) Revision 0 PROGRAM (PGM) OBJECTIVE PGM.1 An effective SSO Program is established by the Field Element Manager to apply engineering expertise to maintain safety system configuration and to assess system condition and effectiveness of safety management program implementation. Criteria PGM.1.1 The SSO Qualification Program is part of the Technical Qualification Program (DOE M 426.1-1A, Chapter III, Section 1, 2.b (1)). PGM.1.2 The SSO Program establishes appropriate training, qualification, and performance requirements for SSO personnel and the supervisors are held accountable for achieving them (DOE M 426.1-1A, Chapter III, Section 1, 2.b

449

Decentralized Solar Energy Technology Assessment Program: review of activities (April 1978-December 1979)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Decentralized Solar Energy Technology Assessment Program (TAP), sponsored by the Office of Solar Energy, Department of Energy, is a technology assessment and planning activity directed at local communities. Specifically, the objectives of the TAP are: (1) to assess the socioeconomic and institutional impacts of the widespread use of renewable energy technologies; (2) to involve communities in planning for their energy futures; and (3) to plan for local energy development. This report discusses two major efforts of the TAP during the period April 1978 to December 1979: the community TA's and several support studies. Four communities have been contracted to undertake an assessment-planning exercise to examine the role of solar renewable energy technologies in their future. The communities selected are the Southern Tier Central Region of New York State, (STC); Richmond, Kentucky, Kent, Ohio; and Franklin County, Massachusetts. Descriptions and progress to date of the community TA's are presented in detail. Two major support study efforts are also presented. A review of existing literature on the legal and institutional issues relative to the adoption of decentralized solar technologies is summarized. A preliminary analysis of potential socioeconomic impacts and other social considerations relative to decentralized solar technologies is also described.

Bronfman, B.H.; Carnes, S.A.; Schweitzer, M.; Peelle, E.; Enk, G.

1980-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

Efficient Range and Join Query Processing in Massively Distributed Peer-to-Peer Networks.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??Peer-to-peer (P2P) has become a modern distributed computing architecture that supports massively large-scale data management and query processing. Complex query operators such as range operator (more)

Wang, Qiang

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

WhanauSIP : a secure peer-to-peer communications platform  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This thesis presents a novel mechanism for achieving secure and reliable peer-to-peer communications on the Internet. WhanauSIP merges a Sybil-proof distributed hash table with the session initiation protocol (SIP) to ...

Cheng, Raymond (Raymond Y.)

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

452

Towards OLAP query reformulation in peer-to-peer data warehousing  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Inter-business collaborative contexts prefigure a distributed scenario where companies organize and coordinate themselves to develop common and shared opportunities. Traditional business intelligence systems do not provide support to this end. Peer Data ... Keywords: data warehouse integration, peer-to-peer architecture, query reformulation, schema mapping

Matteo Golfarelli; Federica Mandreoli; Wilma Penzo; Stefano Rizzi; Elisa Turricchia

2010-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Information Retrieval in Peer-to-Peer Systems Wolf-Tilo Balke  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Information Retrieval in Peer-to-Peer Systems Wolf-Tilo Balke L3S Research Center and University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany balke@l3s.de Abstract Applying information retrieval techniques in peer, information Retrieval techniques vastly differ from retrieval in pure data management systems. Information

Balke, Wolf-Tilo

454

Free-Riding on BitTorrent-Like Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Systems: Modeling  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Free-Riding on BitTorrent-Like Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Systems: Modeling Analysis and Improvement contribution and prevent free-riding. However, BitTorrent's ability to prevent free-riding needs further study. In this paper, we present a fluid model with two different classes of peers to capture the effect of free

Wu, Jie

455

A Peer-to-Peer Approach to Wireless LAN Roaming  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We make the case for a Global Confederation of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Wireless Local Area Networks. A P2P Wireless Network Confederation (P2PWNC) is a community of administrative domains that offer wireless Internet access to each other's registered users. The ubiquitous Internet access that the roaming users of these domains could enjoy compensates for their home domain's cost of providing access to visitors. Existing roaming schemes utilize central authorities or bilateral contracts to control access to resources. In contrast, a P2PWNC forms a pure P2P community in which participating domains are autonomous entities. Domains make independent decisions concerning the amount of bandwidth they contribute. As a result, similarly to existing P2P systems, a P2PWNC will suffer from "free-riding" if no incentive mechanisms exist to ensure that domains offer the amount of resources that is economically justified. Flexible rules on reciprocity can be set to delimit domain actions and encourage domains to provide in order to consume. In this paper, we present several aspects of the P2PWNC requirements and design. We outline several P2PWNC implementation issues relating to user privacy and the confederation's real-world deployment. We also describe the P2PWNC prototype that we developed.

Elias C. Efstathiou; George C. Polyzos

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

A simple analytical framework to analyze search strategies in large-scale peer-to-peer networks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper presents an analytical framework to study search strategies in large-scale decentralized unstructured peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. The peers comprising the P2P network and their application-level connections are modeled as generalized random ... Keywords: analytical modeling, generalized random graphs, generating functions, peer-to-peer, search strategies

R. Gaeta; G. Balbo; S. Bruell; M. Gribaudo; M. Sereno

2005-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

457

Review of international geothermal activities and assessment of US industry opportunities: Final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This study was initiated to review and assess international developments in the geothermal energy field and to define business opportunities for the US geothermal industry. The report establishes data bases on the status of worldwide geothermal development and the competitiveness of US industry. Other factors identified include existing legislation, tax incentives, and government institutions or agencies and private sector organizations that promote geothermal exports. Based on the initial search of 177 countries and geographic entities, 71 countries and areas were selected as the most likely targets for the expansion of the geothermal industry internationally. The study then determined to what extent their geothermal resource had been developed, what countries had aided or participated in this development, and what plans existed for future development. Data on the energy, economic, and financial situations were gathered.

Not Available

1987-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

Preliminary Review of Safety Assessment Issues at Savannah River Site, August 2011  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

At the request of Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) management, a review team composed of experts in atmospheric transport modeling for environmental radiation dose assessment convened at the Savannah River Site (SRS) on August 29-30, 2011. Several issues were presented at the meeting for discussion. This is a short summary that is organized in accordance with the primary issues discussed, which is not necessarily a chronological record. Issues include: SRS Meteorological Data and its Use in MACCS2; Deposition Velocities for Particles; Deposition Velocities for Tritium; MACCS2 Dispersion Coefficients; Use of Low Surface Roughness in Open Areas; Adequacy of Meteorological Tower and Instrumentation; Displacement Height; and Validity of MACCS2 Calculations at Close-in Distances. A longer report will be issued at a later date that expands upon these topics and recommendations.

Napier, Bruce A.; Rishel, Jeremy P.; Bixler, Nathan E.

2011-09-19T23:59:59.000Z

459

Review of international geothermal activities and assessment of US industry opportunities: Summary report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes a study initiated to review and assess international developments in the geothermal energy field and to define business opportunities for the US geothermal industry. The report establishes data bases on the status of worldwide geothermal development and the competitiveness of US industry. Other factors identified include existing legislation, tax incentives, and government institutions or agencies and private sector organizations that promote geothermal exports. Based on the initial search of 177 countries and geographic entities, 71 countries and areas were selected as the most likely targets for the expansion of the geothermal industry internationally. The study then determined to what extent their geothermal resource had been developed, what countries had aided or participated in this development, and what plans existed for future development. Data on the energy, economic, and financial situations were gathered.

Not Available

1987-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

460

CERTS 2012 Program Review - Measurement-Based Stability Assessment - Dan Trudnowski, U Montana  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Stability Stability Assessment DOE/CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D Internal Program Review Meeting June 12-13, 2012 Washington DC Presenter: Dan Trudnowski, Montana Tech Participants: Dan Trudnowski John Pierre, U of Wyoming Ning Zhou, PNNL Louis Scharf, Consultant 2 Project Objective and Application * Objective: Develop, test, and refine algorithms to automatically estimate oscillations from PMUs in real time. - estimate modal frequency, damping, and shape - estimate mode-estimation performance and validation indices (e.g., error bounds) - detect forced oscillations and identify the cause(s) of such oscillations - collaborate with power-industry partners to test potential algorithms - assist in the WECC system tests * Application - Real-Time Situational Awareness based upon actual system

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "assessment peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

DOE/EA-1635: Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project (March 2010)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 March 2010 Acronyms and Abbreviations °C degrees Celsius AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards AIRFA American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 amsl above mean sea level APLIC Avian Power Line Interaction Committee BEPC Basin Electric Power Cooperative BFE Base Flood Elevation BGEPA Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act BMP best management practice CFR Code of Federal Regulations CO 2 carbon dioxide Council Advisory Council on Historic Preservation CRP Conservation Reserve Program

462

Review of air quality assessment studies and definitions of some research needs for the emerging oil shale technology  

SciTech Connect

This paper reviews the air quality assessment programs that have been conducted by the various private and government sponsored developers who propose to extract energy from the oil shale. These studies have ranged from regional comprehensive baseline and environmental impact studies over several years' period to intermittant localized small scale air quality monitoring programs. A review of the environmental programs, their location, retorting type, and extent of environmental program undertaken is given.

Parker, G.B.

1979-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

463

Measuring the evolution of internet peering agreements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

There is much interest in studying the structure and evolution of the Internet at the Autonomous System (AS) level. However, limitations of public data sources in detecting settlement-free peering links meant that prior work focused almost exclusively ... Keywords: autonomous systems, economics, internet topology, peering

Amogh Dhamdhere; Himalatha Cherukuru; Constantine Dovrolis; Kc Claffy

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Event:Technical Workshop & Peer Exchange 'NAMA finance and MRV...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Technical Workshop & Peer Exchange 'NAMA finance and MRV' Jump to: navigation, search Calendar.png Technical Workshop & Peer Exchange 'NAMA finance and MRV': on 20120911...

465

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Publication 9285.7-01D Publication 9285.7-01D January 1998 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments) Interim Office of Emergency and Remedial Response U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Revision No. 0 ii January 1998 NOTICE This document provides guidance to EPA staff. The guidance is designed to communicate National policy on the planning, reporting and review of Superfund risk assessments. The document does not, however, substitute for EPA's statutes or regulations, nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, it cannot impose legally-binding requirements on EPA, States, or the regulated community, and may not apply to a particular situation based upon

466

CERTS 2012 Program Review - IEEE-IEC Harmonization - Ken Martin...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Harmonization Kenneth Martin martin@electricpowergroup.com June 12-13, 2012 Washington, DC OE Transmission Reliability Peer Review 1 Introduction Synchrophasor measurement...

467

Construction Review | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policies EFRCs FOA Applications from Universities and Other Research...

468

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2012 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to Congress Policies and Acts Financial Opportunities Related Links U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Library > Annual...

469

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2004 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to Congress Policies and Acts Financial Opportunities Related Links U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Library > Annual...

470

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Proceedings The Annual Merit Review provides an opportunity for peer evaluation of the projects funded by the Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program. An opening plenary...

471

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: Annual Merit Review and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to Congress Policies and Acts Financial Opportunities Related Links U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Library > Annual...

472

Insecticide Exposures on Commercial Aircraft: A Literature Review and Screening Level Assessment  

SciTech Connect

The objective of this project was to provide initial estimates of the relationship between insecticide use on passenger aircraft and exposure levels present in the cabin environment. The work was initially divided into three tasks including 1) a review of insecticide application practices in commercial aircraft, 2) exploratory measurements of insecticide concentrations in treated aircraft and 3) screening level exposure modeling. Task 1 gathered information that is needed to assess the time-concentration history of insecticides in the airline cabin. The literature review focused on application practices, information about the cabin environment and existing measurements of exposure concentrations following treatment. Information from the airlines was not available for estimating insecticide application rates in the U.S. domestic fleet or for understanding how frequently equipment rotate into domestic routes following insecticide treatment. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends several methods for treating aircraft with insecticide. Although there is evidence that these WHO guidelines may not always be followed, and that practices vary by airline, destination, and/or applicator company, the guidelines in combination with information related to other indoor environments provides a plausible basis for estimating insecticide loading rates on aircraft. The review also found that while measurements of exposure concentrations following simulated aerosol applications are available, measurements following residual treatment of aircraft or applications in domestic aircraft are lacking. Task 2 focused on developing an approach to monitor exposure concentrations in aircraft using a combination of active and passive sampling methods. An existing active sampling approach was intended to provide data immediately following treatment while a passive sampler was developed to provide wider coverage of the fleet over longer sampling periods. The passive sampler, based on a thin-film polymer-coated glass design, was developed specifically for deployment in the airliner ventilation system for long-term unattended monitoring of insecticide loading in the aircraft. Because access was not available for either treated aircraft or treatment records during the course of this study, the development and calibration of the passive samplers was halted prior to completion. Continued development of a field ready passive sampler for insecticides in aircraft would require collaboration with the airline industry to finalize the method for deployment and calibration conditions for the sampler. The Task 3 screening level modeling assessment used a dynamic two-box mass balance model that includes treated surfaces and air to explore the time-concentration history of insecticides in the cabin. The model was parameterized using information gathered during the literature review and run for several different insecticide use scenarios. Chemical degradation or sequestration in the surface compartment and mass transfer from the surface to the air limit the rate at which insecticides are removed from the system. This rate limiting process can result in an accumulation of insecticide in the airliner cabin following repeated applications. The extent of accumulation is a function of the overall persistence of the chemical in the system and the amount of chemical applied during each treatment.

Maddalena, Randy I.; McKone, Thomas E.

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

Preliminary Review of Models, Assumptions, and Key Data used in Performance Assessments and Composite Analysis at the Idaho National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

This document is in response to a request by Ming Zhu, DOE-EM to provide a preliminary review of existing models and data used in completed or soon to be completed Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses (PA/CA) documents, to identify codes, methodologies, main assumptions, and key data sets used.

Arthur S. Rood; Swen O. Magnuson

2009-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

474

Savannah River Restart Peer Evaluation Program final examination report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During the period of August 13, 1990 through September 6, 1991 the Savannah River Peer Evaluation Program was administered during three distinct phases to 73 certified Central Control Room Operators, Central Control Room Supervisors, and Shift Technical Engineers assigned to the K Reactor, on the Savannah River Site (SRS). This program was conceived and developed by the Department of Energy (DOE) and it`s implementation satisfies recommendations made by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. The review identified both strengths and weaknesses of the procedures and personnel.

Morgan, M.P.; Draper, D.G.

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

475

Savannah River Restart Peer Evaluation Program final examination report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During the period of August 13, 1990 through September 6, 1991 the Savannah River Peer Evaluation Program was administered during three distinct phases to 73 certified Central Control Room Operators, Central Control Room Supervisors, and Shift Technical Engineers assigned to the K Reactor, on the Savannah River Site (SRS). This program was conceived and developed by the Department of Energy (DOE) and it's implementation satisfies recommendations made by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. The review identified both strengths and weaknesses of the procedures and personnel.

Morgan, M.P.; Draper, D.G.

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

Health impact assessment in Australia: A review and directions for progress  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This article provides an overview of Health Impact Assessment (HIA) within Australia. We discuss the development and current position of HIA and offer some directions for HIA's progression. Since the early 1990s HIA activity in Australia has increased and diversified in application and practice. This article first highlights the emergent streams of HIA practice across environmental, policy and health equity foci, and how these have developed within Australia. The article then provides summaries of current practice provided by each Australian state and territory. We then offer some insight into current issues that require further progression or resolution if HIA is to progress effectively in Australia. This progress rests both on developing broad system support for HIA across government, led by the health sector, and developing system capacity to undertake, commission or review HIAs. We argue that a unified and clear HIA approach is required as a prerequisite to gaining the understanding and support for HIA in the public and private sectors and the wider community.

Harris, Patrick, E-mail: patrick.harris@unsw.edu.a [Research Fellow, Centre for Health Equity Training, Research and Evaluation, Part of the Centres for Primary Health Care and Equity, UNSW, Locked Mail Bag 7103, Liverpool BC, NSW 1871 (Australia); Spickett, Jeff, E-mail: J.Spickett@curtin.edu.a [WHO Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health Impact Assessment, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987 Perth, Western Australia (Australia)

2011-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

477

Protocol for EM Review/Field Self-Assessment of Site-Specific QAPs/QIPs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The purpose of this document is to present the review protocol and lines of inquiry (LOIs) that are used as basis for EM-HQ technical review and approval of site-specific QAP/QIPs.

478

Building flexible manufacturing systems based on peer-its  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Peer-to-peer computing principles have started to pervade into mechanical control systems, inducing a paradigm shift from centralized to autonomic control. We have developed a self-contained, miniaturized, universal and scalable peer-to-peer based hardware-software ...

A. Ferscha; M. Hechinger; M. dos Santos Rocha; R. Mayrhofer; A. Zeidler; A. Riener; M. Franz

2008-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

479

EM Performs Tenth Technology Readiness Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM Performs Tenth Technology Readiness Assessment EM Performs Tenth Technology Readiness Assessment EM Performs Tenth Technology Readiness Assessment January 31, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Employees with Savannah River Remediation, the SRS liquid waste contractor, review mock-ups of the SCIX technology at the Savannah River National Laboratory. Employees with Savannah River Remediation, the SRS liquid waste contractor, review mock-ups of the SCIX technology at the Savannah River National Laboratory. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM recently completed its tenth Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) since piloting the TRA process in 2006. A TRA is an intensive peer review process through which the maturity of a technology is evaluated. A TRA utilizes the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale pioneered by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

480

EM Performs Tenth Technology Readiness Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Performs Tenth Technology Readiness Assessment Performs Tenth Technology Readiness Assessment EM Performs Tenth Technology Readiness Assessment January 31, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Employees with Savannah River Remediation, the SRS liquid waste contractor, review mock-ups of the SCIX technology at the Savannah River National Laboratory. Employees with Savannah River Remediation, the SRS liquid waste contractor, review mock-ups of the SCIX technology at the Savannah River National Laboratory. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM recently completed its tenth Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) since piloting the TRA process in 2006. A TRA is an intensive peer review process through which the maturity of a technology is evaluated. A TRA utilizes the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale pioneered by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

First Page Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8