Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Trails Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Trails Working Group Trails Working Group Trails Working Group Our mission is to inventory, map, and prepare historical reports on the many trails used at LANL. Contact Environmental Communication & Public Involvement P.O. Box 1663 MS M996 Los Alamos, NM 87545 (505) 667-0216 Email The LANL Trails Working Group inventories, maps, and prepares historical reports on the many trails used at LANL. Some of these trails are ancient pueblo footpaths that continue to be used for recreational hiking today. Some serve as quiet and non-motorized alternatives between the Townsite and LANL or between technical areas. The Trails Working Group, established in December 2003, includes representatives from local citizen hiking groups, Los Alamos County, Forest Service, Park Service, Los Alamos National Laboratory and the NNSA Los

2

Interagency Sustainability Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Interagency Sustainability Working Group (ISWG) is the coordinating body for sustainable buildings in the federal government.

3

Working Group 7 Summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary subject of working group 7 at the 2012 Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop was muon accelerators for a muon collider or neutrino factory. Additionally, this working group included topics that did not fit well into other working groups. Two subjects were discussed by more than one speaker: lattices to create a perfectly integrable nonlinear lattice, and a Penning trap to create antihydrogen.

Nagaitsev S.; Berg J.

2012-06-10T23:59:59.000Z

4

QEP WORKING GROUP CHARGES Assessment Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. (Standard 2.12) During Phase I of the planning process, members of the Assessment Working Group with the institution's strategic plan, a review of the literature, definition of student learning appropriate related to goals. (Handbook for Review Committees, Standards 2.12 and 3.3.2) During Phase I

Liu, Paul

5

Working Group Report: Sensors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Sensors play a key role in detecting both charged particles and photons for all three frontiers in Particle Physics. The signals from an individual sensor that can be used include ionization deposited, phonons created, or light emitted from excitations of the material. The individual sensors are then typically arrayed for detection of individual particles or groups of particles. Mounting of new, ever higher performance experiments, often depend on advances in sensors in a range of performance characteristics. These performance metrics can include position resolution for passing particles, time resolution on particles impacting the sensor, and overall rate capabilities. In addition the feasible detector area and cost frequently provides a limit to what can be built and therefore is often another area where improvements are important. Finally, radiation tolerance is becoming a requirement in a broad array of devices. We present a status report on a broad category of sensors, including challenges for the future and work in progress to solve those challenges.

Artuso, M.; et al.,

2013-10-18T23:59:59.000Z

6

Photoelectrochemical Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Photoelectrochemical Working Group meets regularly to review technical progress, develop synergies, and collaboratively develop common tools and processes for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water...

7

Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group of research and industry experts focuses on issues related to the cost, safety, and reliability of hydrogen pipelines. Participants represent organizations...

8

Interagency Working Groups (IWGs)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interagency Working Groups (IWGs) Print E-mail Interagency Working Groups (IWGs) Print E-mail Interagency Working Groups (IWGs) are the primary USGCRP vehicles for implementing and coordinating research activities within and across agencies. These groups are critical to Program integration and in assessing the Program's progress. The working groups span a wide range of interconnected issues of climate and global change, and address major components of the Earth's environmental and human systems, as well as cross-disciplinary approaches for addressing these issues. IWGs correspond to program functions and are designed to bring agencies together to plan and develop coordinated activities, implement joint activities, and identify and fill gaps in the Program's plans. They allow public officials to communicate with each other on emerging directions within their agencies, on their stakeholder needs, and on best practices learned from agency activities. Together, these functions allow the agencies to work in a more coordinated and effective manner.

9

Strategic Initiatives Work Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Work Group, comprised of members representing DOE, contractor and worker representatives, provides a forum for information sharing; data collection and analysis; as well as, identifying best practices and initiatives to enhance safety performance and safety culture across the Complex.

10

Working Group Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 Working Group Reports Special Working Session on the Role of Buoy Observations in the Tropical Western Pacific Measurement Scheme J. Downing Marine Sciences Laboratory Sequim, Washington R. M. Reynolds Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York Attending W. Clements (TWPPO) F. Barnes (TWPPO) T. Ackerman (TWP Site Scientist) M. Ivey (ARCS Manager) H. Church J. Curry J. del Corral B. DeRoos S. Kinne J. Mather J. Michalsky M. Miller P. Minnett B. Porch J. Sheaffer P. Webster M. Wesely K. Zorika G. Zhang Focus of Discussion The session convened on March 2, with brief introductions by Bill Clements. The purpose of the session was to discuss the scientific merits of retrofitting TOGA/TAO buoys with shortwave radiometers. Three questions were posed at the outset of the session to focus the discussion.

11

High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This presentation provides an overview of the High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting in May 2007.

12

Work Force Retention Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Work force Retention Work Group is established to support the Department’s critical focus on maintaining a high-performing work force at a time when a significant number of the workers needed to support DOE’s national security mission are reaching retirement age.

13

Water Resources Working Group Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Water Resources Working Group Report This report provided content for the Wisconsin Initiative in February 2011. #12;Water Resources Working Group Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts October 2010 #12;Water Resources Working Group Members ­ WICCI Tim Asplund (Co-Chair) - Wisconsin Department

Sheridan, Jennifer

14

Interagency Sustainability Working Group | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Interagency Sustainability Working Group Interagency Sustainability Working Group The Interagency Sustainability Working Group (ISWG) is the...

15

Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group Agenda | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group Agenda Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group Agenda Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group Agenda More Documents &...

16

Infrared Thermography (IRT) Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Infrared Thermography (IRT) Working Group Sco McWilliams U.S. Photovoltaic Manufacturing Consor;um (PVMC) Infrared Thermography Infrared Thermography (IRT) has been demonstrated...

17

Strategic Initiatives Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Strategic Initiatives Work Group promote excellence and continuous improvement in the implementation of worker health and safety programs across the DOE complex.

18

High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The High Temperature Membrane Working Group consists of government, industry, and university researchers interested in developing high temperature membranes for fuel cells.

19

Renewable Electricity Working Group Presentation  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Renewable Electricity Working Group Chris Namovicz, Renewable Electricity Analysis Team July 9, 2013 Agenda * Review status of AEO 2013 * Discuss new model updates and development...

20

FACT SHEET: BIOENERGY WORKING GROUP  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2010 , 2010 1 FACT SHEET: BIOENERGY WORKING GROUP At the Clean Energy Ministerial in Washington, D.C. on July 19 th and 20 th , ministers launched a Bioenergy Working Group, which will advance the deployment of bioenergy technologies by implementing recommendations of the Technology Action Plan on Bioenergy Technologies that was released by the Major Economies Forum Global Partnership in December 2009. The Working Group will work in close cooperation with the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP), which is co-chaired by Brazil and Italy. Initial key activities of the Working Group include: 1. Global Bioenergy Atlas: The Working Group will combine and build upon existing databases of sustainably-developed bioenergy potential around the globe and make it available in an open web-

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

RHIC II Science Working Groups  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Workshops Workshops The series of RHIC II Science Workshops began in November 2004, at which time seven Working Groups were initiated. These groups met in workshops through 2005, with the purpose of providing an organized forum for the community to address and describe quantitatively the most important science issues for the proposed RHIC II luminosity upgrade, and corresponding detector upgrades. Each Working Group was led by three convenors representing theory and experiment, and each has produced a detailed report (except for the "New Directions" group, which provided a sounding board and input to the other groups). The Working Group reports are linked below. The summary "white paper" document, "Future Science at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider" (PDF), is based on these reports, and was prepared by a Writing Committee that included at least one convenor from each of the Working Groups.

22

Health and Safety Work Plan for Sampling Colloids in Waste Area Grouping 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Work Plan/Site Safety and Health Plan (SSHP) and the attached work plan are for the performance of the colloid project at WAG 5. The work will be conducted by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Environmental Sciences Division (ESD) and associated ORNL environmental, safety, and health support groups. The purpose of this document is to establish health and safety guidelines to be followed by all personnel involved in conducting work for this project. The levels of protection and the procedures specified in this plan are based on the best information available from historical data and preliminary evaluations of the area. Therefore, these recommendations represent the minimum health and safety requirements to be observed by all personnel engaged in this project.

Marsh, J.D.; McCarthy, J.F.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

23

BEDES Strategic Working Group Recommendations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The BEDES Strategic Working Group Recommendations document is a guide to how the BEDES Dictionary can be brought to market and provide the services for which it was designed.

24

DOE Catalysis Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PEMFC Performance and Durability - Jim Waldecker (Ford) 9:45 - 10:00 Degradation of Nanoparticle Pt alloy and De-alloyed Pt Catalysts - Debbie Myers (ANL) Catalysis Working Group...

25

Report of Working Group IV  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This report summarizes the discussions of the Working Group on Resource Policy and East-West Relationships that were held as part of the NATO Advance Study Institute on “Deposit and Geoenvironmental Models for...

Gabor Gaál; Slavko Šolar

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

Interagency Committees and Working Groups  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE is actively involved with other Federal agencies that have responsibilities for the radiation protection of the public and the environment. This site provides the different committees and working groups that DOE is involved with.

27

Interagency Advanced Power Group, Solar Working Group: Meeting minutes  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is the minutes of the Solar Working group. The meeting was prompted by the Steering Group`s desire to resolve issues the Solar Working Group.

Not Available

1993-10-14T23:59:59.000Z

28

September 8, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom - Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Health, Safety and Security Focus Group [Name of Work Group] Work Group Charter (Date) I. PURPOSE The HSS Focus Group [Name of Work Group] is one of several HSS Work Groups, established to address worker health, safety and security programs improvements across the U.S. Department of Energy Complex. The [Name of Work Group] has been established to (state specific purpose). II. OBJECTIVES (State the desired impact(s) and major outcome(s) for, the Work Group) 1. Establish specific improvement goals, intended outputs and supporting activities that respond to identified worker health and safety improvement needs. 2. Establish measurable indicators when possible to support findings, recommendations and accomplishments.

29

Interagency Sustainability Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Areas » Sustainable Buildings & Campuses » Interagency Program Areas » Sustainable Buildings & Campuses » Interagency Sustainability Working Group Interagency Sustainability Working Group October 4, 2013 - 5:00pm Addthis The Interagency Sustainability Working Group (ISWG) is the coordinating body for sustainable buildings in the Federal Government. The ISWG: Serves as a forum for information exchange and promotes agency implementation of goals for high-performance and sustainable buildings Develops policy and reporting guidance that fosters the widespread adoption of sustainable design and operations in the Federal sector Develops technical guidance and tools to support implementation of agency sustainability policies for Federally owned, operated, and leased buildings. The ISWG is also charged with providing assistance for implementing the

30

Visualization and Modeling Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During the 2005 Hurricane season, many consequence predictions were available from 36 to 96 hours before landfalls, via the Department of Energy’s Visualization and Modeling Working Group (VMWG). Real-time data can be tapped by local officials and utilities, and can also be accessed for post-event regulatory audits. An overview of VMWG’s models, results and uses will be presented.

Fernandez, S.J. (LANL); Dodrill, K.A.

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

31

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Consolidated Grant Topic Group |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Consolidated Grant Topic Consolidated Grant Topic Group TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Consolidated Grant Topic Group The Consolidated Grant Topic Group arose from recommendations provided by the TEC and other external parties to the DOE Senior Executive Transportation Forum in July 1998. It was proposed that the consolidation of multiple funding streams from numerous DOE sources into a single grant would provide a more equitable and efficient means of assistance to States and Tribes affected by DOE nuclear material shipments. The group serves as an important vehicle for DOE senior managers to assess and incorporate stakeholder input into the development of a consolidated funding vehicle for transportation activities, should DOE implement such a program. Some of the major issues under consideration by the Consolidated Grant

32

Transportation External Coordination Working Group:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Accomplishments and Future Accomplishments and Future Transportation External Coordination Working Group Meeting Phoenix, AZ Judith A. Holm, Office of National Transportation Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management April 4, 2005 TEC MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) American Nuclear Society (ANS) Association of American Railroads (AAR) Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. (CRCPD) Council of Energy Resource Tribes (CERT) Council of State Governments-Eastern Regional Conference (CSG-ERC) Council of State Governments-Midwestern Office (CSG-MW) Council on Radionuclides and Radiopharmaceuticals (CORAR) Dangerous Goods Advisory Council (DGAC)

33

Transportation External Coordination Working Group:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

External Coordination External Coordination Working Group: Background and Process Judith Holm National Transportation Program Albuquerque, New Mexico April 21, 2004 TEC History * DOE's Office of Environmental Management (EM) and Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) formed TEC in 1992 * EM & RW developed MOU and TEC charter in 1992 - Other DOE program offices joined in 1993-94 * Other agencies (DOT, FRA, NRC, EPA) have been active participants Meeting Locations 1992-present Some Founding Principles * TEC concept centered on unique stakeholder accountability principles - Participation by key responsible parties in technical/policy issue discussion and resolution results in increased confidence and more efficient business decisions * Ultimate goal: develop multi-year set of

34

Mixed Waste Working Group report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The treatment of mixed waste remains one of this country`s most vexing environmental problems. Mixed waste is the combination of radioactive waste and hazardous waste, as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The Department of Energy (DOE), as the country`s largest mixed waste generator, responsible for 95 percent of the Nation`s mixed waste volume, is now required to address a strict set of milestones under the Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992. DOE`s earlier failure to adequately address the storage and treatment issues associated with mixed waste has led to a significant backlog of temporarily stored waste, significant quantities of buried waste, limited permanent disposal options, and inadequate treatment solutions. Between May and November of 1993, the Mixed Waste Working Group brought together stakeholders from around the Nation. Scientists, citizens, entrepreneurs, and bureaucrats convened in a series of forums to chart a course for accelerated testing of innovative mixed waste technologies. For the first time, a wide range of stakeholders were asked to examine new technologies that, if given the chance to be tested and evaluated, offer the prospect for better, safer, cheaper, and faster solutions to the mixed waste problem. In a matter of months, the Working Group has managed to bridge a gap between science and perception, engineer and citizen, and has developed a shared program for testing new technologies.

Not Available

1993-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

35

Training Work Group Charter | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Charter Training Work Group Charter The Training Work Group fosters improvements in the quality, efficacy, and delivery of DOE safety training, and realizes significant...

36

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Catalysis Working Catalysis Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on AddThis.com... Key Activities Plans, Implementation, & Results Accomplishments Organization Chart & Contacts Quick Links Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Fuel Cells Technology Validation Manufacturing Codes & Standards Education Systems Analysis

37

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About About Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on AddThis.com... Key Activities Plans, Implementation, & Results Accomplishments Organization Chart & Contacts

38

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Communications Conference...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Communications Conference Call Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Communications Conference Call Summaries Conference Call Summaries Conference Call Summary April...

39

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Routing Conference Call Summaries...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Routing Conference Call Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Routing Conference Call Summaries CONFERENCE CALL SUMMARIES January 31, 2008 December 6, 2007 October 4, 2007...

40

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Security Conference Call Summaries...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Security Conference Call Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Security Conference Call Summaries Conference Call Summaries August 17, 2006 (Draft) July 18, 2006 (Draft) June...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Protocols Conference...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Conference Call Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Protocols Conference Call Summaries Conference Call Summaries May 13, 1999 April 8, 1999 March 1, 1999 More...

42

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Security Meeting Summaries | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Security Meeting Summaries Meeting Summaries Green Bay STG Meeting Summary- September 14, 2006 Washington STG Meeting Summary - March 14,...

43

Transportation Protocols Working Group First Conference Call...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Call March 1, 1999 Conference Call Summary The first conference call of the Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TECWG) DOE Transportation Protocols Working...

44

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) utility partners are eager to work closely with Federal agencies to help achieve energy management goals.

45

HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting Meeting Dates: July 10 - 11 The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Training Work Group met at the DOE National Training Center (NTC) inAlbuquerque, NM on Tuesday, July 10 and Wednesday, July 11, 2012. The meeting was chaired by the Work Group co-chairs, Karen Boardman (HSS/NTC),Pete Stafford (AFL-CIO BCTD/CPWR), and Julie Johnston (EFCOG). Attachment 1 is the Meeting Agenda; Attachment 2 is a list of meeting attendees; and Attachment3 is the proposed Radworker Training Reciprocity Program. Meeting Agenda Meeting Summary Draft RAD Worker Training Reciprocity Program for Work Group v.1 Draft Radiation Worker Portability Validation

46

Training Work Group Charter | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Charter Charter Training Work Group Charter The Training Work Group fosters improvements in the quality, efficacy, and delivery of DOE safety training, and realizes significant efficiencies by minimizing redundancies across the DOE Complex. The Work Group provides a collaborative opportunity for DOE to gain insights from operating contractors, the contractor work force and their representatives, and to combine the best wisdom to assure that the most efficient and effective worker health and safety program expectations, approaches and processes are in place and are well communicated. Training Work Group Charter More Documents & Publications HSS Briefing to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) on Union Activities 10 CFR 851 Implementation Work Group Charter

47

Agenda: High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Agenda for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group (HTMWG) meeting on May 18, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia

48

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Durability Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Durability Working Group Durability Working Group The Durability Working Group meets twice per year to exchange information, create synergies, and collaboratively develop both an understanding of and tools for studying degradation mechanisms of polymer electrolyte fuel cell stacks. Its members include principle investigators and supporting personnel from U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-funded durability projects. More information on DOE durability activities can be found in the Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan. Description Technical Targets Meetings Contacts Description DOE durability targets for stationary and transportation fuel cells are 40,000 hours and 5,000 hours, respectively, under realistic operating conditions. In the most demanding applications, realistic operating conditions include impurities in the fuel and air, starting and stopping, freezing and thawing, and humidity and load cycles that result in stresses on the chemical and mechanical stability of the fuel cell materials, components, and interfaces. Degradation-exacerbating conditions resulting from cyclic operation include hydrogen starvation, differential pressure imbalance, oxidation-reduction cycling, and oxygen ingress to the anode, resulting in high cathode potentials. Significant progress has been made in determining the degradation mechanisms of fuel cell components and developing improved materials. However, as stated in the 2008 DOE Fuel Cell Solicitation, there is a need for further research and development in the following areas:

49

HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training Work Group Meeting Training Work Group Meeting HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting Meeting Dates: July 10 - 11 The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Training Work Group met at the DOE National Training Center (NTC) inAlbuquerque, NM on Tuesday, July 10 and Wednesday, July 11, 2012. The meeting was chaired by the Work Group co-chairs, Karen Boardman (HSS/NTC),Pete Stafford (AFL-CIO BCTD/CPWR), and Julie Johnston (EFCOG). Attachment 1 is the Meeting Agenda; Attachment 2 is a list of meeting attendees; and Attachment3 is the proposed Radworker Training Reciprocity Program. Meeting Agenda Meeting Summary Draft RAD Worker Training Reciprocity Program for Work Group v.1 Draft Radiation Worker Portability Validation Meeting Attendees

50

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Wind Working Groups  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Information Information Resources Printable Version Bookmark and Share Publications Success Stories Webinars Podcasts Videos Stakeholder Interviews Lessons Learned Wind Working Groups Economic Impact Studies Wind Turbine Ordinances Wind Working Groups Wind Powering America educates, equips, and supports state wind working groups that form strategic alliances to communicate wind's benefits and challenges to state stakeholders. State Wind Working Groups The U.S. map below shows which states have wind working groups. Click on a state to read about its wind working group. Text version of states with Wind Working Groups Alaska Arizona Arkansas Colorado Connecticut Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Michigan Montana Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New Mexico North Carolina

51

Transportation External Coordination Working Group:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Study of Study of DOE FY03 SNF Shipments Judith Holm National Transportation Program Albuquerque, New Mexico April 21, 2004 Background Benchmarking * The goal of benchmarking is to identify, understand, and adapt outstanding practices from organizations anywhere in the world to help your organization improve its performance * Benchmarking looks outward to find best practice and high performance and then measures actual business operations against those goals Background Best Practices * Best practices are proven solutions that represent superior performance when adapted and implemented in one's own organization. This includes processes and procedures that others are using to transport radioactive materials Background Lessons Learned * Lessons learned are "good work practices" or

52

TEC Working Group Background | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TEC Working Group Background TEC Working Group Background TEC Working Group Background Through the TEC/WG, DOE interacted with representatives of organizations at the state, tribal, and local levels to obtain input for program needs assessment, development and management, and to enhance their capability to carry out transportation emergency preparedness and safety activities specifically related to radioactive materials shipments. TEC membership included representatives from national, state, tribal and local government organizations, labor, industry and professional groups. Members meet semiannually to participate in plenary sessions, breakout work sessions, and in more specialized Topic Groups. To learn more about the history and background of TEC, please see the following documents:

53

TEC Working Group Topic Groups | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Topic Groups Topic Groups TEC Working Group Topic Groups TEC Topic Groups were formed in 1991 following an evaluation of the TEC program. Interested members, DOE and other federal agency staff meet to examine specific issues related to radioactive materials transportation. TEC Topic Groups enable a small number of participants to focus intensively on key issues at a level of detail that is unattainable during the TEC semiannual meetings due to time and group size constraints. Topic Groups meet individually by phone and email between TEC's semiannual general meetings, participate in conference calls and report back to the Department and TEC members. The Topic Groups are intended to work on significant issues, produce a relevant product and sunset the group when the work is

54

Renewable Energy Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Working Group Working Group Renewable Energy Working Group October 7, 2013 - 10:17am Addthis The Renewable Energy Working Group provides a forum for Federal agencies and the renewable energy industry to exchange information on existing and planned projects, lessons learned, sources of project funds, and technologies. Guidance The Renewable Energy Working Group is charged with providing guidance about renewable energy regulatory requirements. Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Under EPAct 2005 and Executive Order 13423 Transmittal Letter Summarizing the Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Members Led by the Federal Energy Management Program, the Renewable Energy Working Group is made up of more than 100 Federal agency representatives, U.S. Department of Energy programs, and the renewable energy industry.

55

Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2012 In conjunction with the HAMMER Steering Committee meeting the HSS Focus Group Training Working Group Meeting was conducted from 2:00 PM to 4:30 PM at the HAMMER Training...

56

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Photoelectrochemical Working Group Photoelectrochemical Working Group Promising PEC Materials The PEC Working Group invites the international research community to assist in the development of PEC Materials White Papers to track the research status of the most promising materials classes for solar water splitting. The Photoelectrochemical Working Group meets regularly to review technical progress, develop synergies, and collaboratively develop common tools and processes for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting. Its members include principal investigators and supporting personnel from U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-funded photoelectrochemical projects. More information on planned DOE photoelectrochemical activities can be found in the Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan.

57

DOE Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pipeline Working Group Workshop August 31, 2005 Augusta, Georgia Hydrogen Pipeline Experience Presented By: LeRoy H. Remp Lead Project Manager Pipeline Projects ppt00 3 Hydrogen...

58

Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) was established to assist DOE in the appropriate and effective use of quantitative risk assessment in nuclear safety related activities.

59

Macro-Industrial Working Group: meeting 1  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

July 24, 2012 Macroeconomic team: Kay Smith, Russ Tarver, Elizabeth Sendich and Vipin Arora WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE...

60

Macro-Industrial Working Group: meeting 1  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 MacroIndustrial Working Group Macroeconomic team: Kay Smith, Russ Tarver, Elizabeth Sendich and Vipin Arora Briefing on Macroeconomic Reference Case for the Annual Energy...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Macro-Industrial Working Group 2  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2 Macro-Industrial Working Group Macroeconomic Analysis Team: Kay Smith, Team Leader, Elizabeth Sendich, Russ Tarver, and Vipin Aurora September 11, 2012 | Washington, DC Macro...

62

Interagency Working Groups | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

among federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. Interagency Sustainability Working Group (ISWG) The ISWG serves as a forum for information exchange and...

63

July 2012, Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. Progress on the completion of the 10 CFR 1046 modifications to address barriers to workforce retention. Written response to public comment is being drafted by HS-51. 2. Pro-Force (PF) union representative, Randy Lawson, identified this accomplishment as the single most significant step toward PF workforce retention in over 20 years. 3. Draft re-charter of PF Career Options Committee (PFCOC) to establish a PF Working Group approved by GC-63 and GC NNSA. Near Term Goals and Activities: 1. Publish 1046 as a final rule - anticipated completion no later than September, assuming timely OMB review and approval. 2. Draft PF Working Group charter final review by senior management to be

64

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Meeting Summaries | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rail Meeting Summaries Rail Meeting Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Meeting Summaries MEETING SUMMARIES Kansas City TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - July 25, 2007 Atlanta TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - March 6, 2007 Green Bay Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - October 26, 2006 Washington DC TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - March 15, 2006 Pueblo TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - September 22, 2005 Phoenix TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - April 4, 2005 Minneapolis TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - September 21, 2004 Albuquerque TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - April 22, 2004 New Orleans TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - January 29, 2002 Jacksonville TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - January 20, 1999 Milwaukee TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - July 13, 1998

65

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Tribal Meeting Summaries | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Meeting Summaries Meeting Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Tribal Meeting Summaries Meeting Summaries Kansas City TEC Meeting - Tribal Group Summary - July 25, 2007 Atlanta TEC Meeting - Tribal Group Summary - March 6, 2007 Green Bay TEC Meeting -- Tribal Group Summary - October 26, 2006 Washington TEC Meeting - Tribal Topic Group Summary - March 14, 2006 Pueblo TEC Meeting - Tribal Topic Group Summary, September 22, 2005 Phoenix TEC Meeting - Tribal Topic Group Summary - April 4, 2005 Albuquerque TEC Meeting - Tribal Topic Group Presentation - April 21, 2004 New Orleans TEC Meeting - Tribal Topic Group Summary - January 29, 2002 Portland TEC Meeting, Tribal Topic Group Summary - February 6, 2001 Philadelphia TEC Meeting, Tribal Topic Group Summary - July 13, 1999

66

September 8, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom - Work Group Guidance  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

29-11 Draft 29-11 Draft Collaboration provides an opportunity to serve as an entity that is greater than the sum of its parts. HSS FOCUS GROUP DRAFT PROPOSED WORK GROUP GUIDANCE BACKGROUND: The HSS Focus Group provides a forum for communication and collaboration related to worker health, safety and security among HSS management and staff, labor unions, DOE Programs and stakeholders. Based on the foundation that labor union representatives are an essential source of frontline perspective in identifying, addressing and resolving worker health, safety and security concerns, the Focus Group has served to open lines of communication with worker representatives and provides a vehicle for information exchange, problem solving, building relationships and trust,

67

September 2012, Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview 2 Subgroups: Pro-Force and Non-Pro-Force Pro-Force Subgroup: Accomplishments: 1. Completion of 10 CFR 1046 [Protective Force Personnel Medical, Physical Readiness, Training, and Access Authorization Standards] as a final rule that includes modification efforts to address barriers to workforce retention. 2. Pro-Force (PF) union representative, Randy Lawson, identified this accomplishment as the single most significant step toward PF workforce retention in over 20 years. 3. Draft re-charter of PF Career Options Committee (PFCOC) to establish a PF Working Group approved by GC-63 and GC NNSA. Near Term Goals and Activities: 1. Publish 1046 as a final rule - publication anticipated this month.

68

July 2012, Training Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training Work Group Status Overview Training Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. May 7 - 8. Attended NIEHS Trainer's Exchange in Oak Ridge . 2. May 8 - 9. Joined HAMMER in visiting Oak Ridge entities to build support for the Radworker Pilot. 3. June 19-20. Joined Char Wells at Sandia (with NIEHS and HAMMER) for the Learning/Training Workshop. 2. NTC offered support for Data Warehousing at the Learning/Training Workshop. 3. Obtained EFCOG commitment to create a Human Capital Training Subgroup under the Business Management Working Group. 4. June 20 - 21. Hosted HAMMER to develop Radworker Reciprocity Program Checklist. 5. July 10-11. HSS Focus Group Training Working Group and Subcommittee meetings at NTC. Upcoming Meetings: Boardman meeting with HAMMER week of July 29.

69

TEC Working Group Background | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Background Background TEC Working Group Background Through the TEC/WG, DOE interacted with representatives of organizations at the state, tribal, and local levels to obtain input for program needs assessment, development and management, and to enhance their capability to carry out transportation emergency preparedness and safety activities specifically related to radioactive materials shipments. TEC membership included representatives from national, state, tribal and local government organizations, labor, industry and professional groups. Members meet semiannually to participate in plenary sessions, breakout work sessions, and in more specialized Topic Groups. To learn more about the history and background of TEC, please see the following documents: TEC Charter TEC Work Plan

70

HSS Focus and Work Group Meetings | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HSS Focus and Work Group Meetings HSS Focus and Work Group Meetings HSS Focus and Work Group Meetings As part of the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) outreach effort, the HSS Focus Group was formed in March 2007 to initiate dialogue and interface with labor unions, DOE Program Secretarial Offices, and stakeholders in areas of mutual interest and concern related to health, safety, security, and the environment. In an ongoing effort to further the improvement of health, safety, environmental, and security performance within the Department, DOE is engaged in the establishment of work groups to pursue health and safety improvements across the DOE Complex. These efforts support DOE's responsibility as owner/manager to protect its greatest asset: the worker. The work groups support DOE's integrated safety management system and

71

Energy Management Working Group: Accelerating Energy Management  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Countries participating in the Global Superior Energy Performance (GSEP) Energy Management Working Group (EMWG) are leveraging their resources and taking collective action to strengthen national and international efforts to facilitate the adoption...

Scheihing, P.

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

72

Transport Modeling Working Group Meeting Reports  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Reports from meetings of the Transport Modeling Working Group, which meets twice per year to exchange information, create synergies, share experimental and computational results, and collaboratively develop methodologies for and understanding of transport phenomena in polymer electrolyte fuel cell stacks.

73

Catalysis Working Group Meeting: June 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Agenda and presentations from the Catalysis Working Group held on June 16, 2014, in Washington, D.C., in conjunction with the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting.

74

W Boson Mass Working Group Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The W boson mass working group discussed the current status of the W boson mass measurement and the prospects for improving on LEP and Tevatron measurements at the LHC.

Kilgore, W.; Kilgore, W.

2010-06-14T23:59:59.000Z

75

Safety Monitor Joint Working Group (JWG) Tour  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 th Meeting of the Joint Working Group of the U.S.-Japan Coordinating Committee of Fusion Energy on Safety in Inter-Institutional Collaborations (U.S.-Japan Safety Monitoring...

76

Work Plan - U.S.-India Coal Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Plan - U.S.-India Coal Working Group Work Plan - U.S.-India Coal Working Group Work Plan - U.S.-India Coal Working Group More Documents & Publications Work Group Telecom...

77

Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) July 17-19, 2001 Cincinnati, Ohio Meeting Summary The Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) held its 19 th semi-annual meeting July 17-19, 2001, in Cincinnati, Ohio. One hundred fifteen people attended (see Appendix A for listing of participants). Jim Carlson, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) and TEC co-chair, welcomed participants to the meeting. He then introduced Robert Owen of the Ohio Department of Health, and Jim Richter of the Cincinnati/Hamilton County Emergency Management Agency, who also made some welcoming remarks. Topic Group Meetings Tribal Issues Topic Group Issues discussed during this meeting included the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) rail safety pilot

78

10 CFR 851 Implementation Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The 10 C.F.R. 851 Work Group is intended to promote excellence in the implementation of 10 C.F.R. 851, “Worker Safety and Health” and continuous improvement in the implementation of health and safety programs for the DOE contractor work force.

79

10 CFR 851 Implementation Work Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The 10 C.F.R. 851 Work Group promotes excellence in the implementation of 10 C.F.R. 851, "Worker Safety and Health" and continuous improvement in the implementation of health and safety programs for the DOE contractor work force.

80

September 2012, Training Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training Work Group Status Overview Training Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. May 7-8. Attended NIEHS Trainer's Exchange in Oak Ridge. 2. May 8-9. Joined HAMMER in visiting Oak Ridge entities to build support for the Radworker pilot. Entities visited included ORISE, Y-12, DOE TRU Project, and local labor entities. 3. June 19-20. Participated with Char Wells, Sandia National Laboratory Training Manager, (NTC, NIEHS and HAMMER in attendance) at a DOE M&O contractor led Learning/Training Workshop. - Obtained EFCOG commitment to create a Human Capital Training Subgroup under the Business Management Working Group. - Serving this group as data repository and communications hub for efforts to standardize General Employee Radiation Training (GERT) within DOE. - Briefed the complex wide Radworker reciprocity concept finding interest and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Transportation Plan Ad Hoc Working Group | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Transportation Plan Ad Hoc Working Group Transportation Plan Ad Hoc Working Group Transportation Plan Ad Hoc Working Group More Documents & Publications Nuclear Fuel Storage and...

82

Records Management Working Group Charter | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Working Group Charter Records Management Working Group Charter The purpose of the Records Management Working Group (RMWG) is to provide guidance, direction, and coordination for...

83

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Training - Medical Training |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training - Medical Training Training - Medical Training TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Training - Medical Training The TEC Training and Medical Training Issues Topic Group was formed to address the training issues for emergency responders in the event of a radioactive material transportation incident. The Topic Group first met in 1996 to assist DOE in developing an approach to address radiological emergency response training needs and to avoid redundancy of existing training materials. The group worked with the Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) to review existing training material to determine its applicability, developed a front-end analysis describing an approach, and developed the Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). In 1998, the Medical Training Issues

84

September 8, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom - Work Group matrix  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rev 09-19-11) Rev 09-19-11) Work Group / HSS and Union Leads Union/Stakeholder/HSS Participants Improvement Issues/Goals Initial/Current Tasks Outputs 10CFR 851 -Implementation -Training HSS Leads: Pat Worthington / Bill McArthur Union Lead: Doug Stephens -USW Co-Lead: Barb McCabe - IUOE TBD - BCTD Dianne Whitten - HAMTC Stan Scott - HAMMER Gary Gustafson - LIUNA Steve Simonson - HSS Tom Staker - HSS Collectively work to ensure implementation of health and safety programs (851 Rule) within and among DOE site contractors to eliminate/minimize inconsistent requirements among M&I, M&O, LLC and SBA contractors/subcontractors. - Identify leads and participants - Develop charter - Goals/ Intended Output - Develop Task Activities - HS-1 engage DOE

85

WRAP process area development control work plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This work plan defines the manner in which the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility, Module I Process Area will be maintained under development control status. This status permits resolution of identified design discrepancies, control system changes, as-building of equipment, and perform modifications to increase process operability and maintainability as parallel efforts. This work plan maintains configuration control as these efforts are undertaken. This task will end with system testing and reissue of field verified design drawings.

Leist, K.L., Fluor Daniel Hanford

1997-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

86

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Catalysis Working Group Catalysis Working Group The Catalysis Working Group (CWG) meets twice per year to exchange information, create synergies, and collaboratively develop both an understanding of and tools for studying electrocatalysis for polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) and other low- and intermediate-temperature fuel cell systems, including direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs), alkaline fuel cells (AFCs), alkaline membrane fuel cells (AMFCs), and phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFCs). The CWG members include principal and co-principal investigators in electrocatalysis projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), as well as supporting DOE personnel. More information on DOE electrocatalysis activities can be found in the Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan.

87

FINAL Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) January 28-30, 2002 New Orleans, Louisiana Meeting Summary The Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) held its 20 th semi-annual meeting January 28-30, 2002, in New Orleans, Louisiana. This was the tenth anniversary of TEC, and 102 attendees from national, State, Tribal, and local government organizations; industry and professional groups and other interested parties in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs, met to address a variety of issues related to DOE's radioactive materials transportation activities. The TEC process includes the involvement of these key stakeholders in developing solutions to DOE transportation issues through their actual participation in the work product. These members provide continuing and improved

88

Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

States Energy Board States Energy Board Joint Meeting of the Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee and the Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group The Hilton Knoxville Knoxville, Tennessee May 15, 2012 Tuesday, May 15, 2012 8:30 a.m. Breakfast 9:30 a.m. Welcome / Opening Remarks / Introductions - Christopher Wells, Southern States Energy Board - Sandra Threatt, Chair, SSEB Radioactive Materials Transportation Working Group - Elgan Usrey, Chair, SSEB Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group 9:45 a.m. WIPP Transportation Program and National TRU Activities - Bill Mackie, Carlsbad Field Office 10:30 a.m. Break 10:45 a.m. Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance Level VI Program Update - Larry Stern, Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance

89

About the RHIC II Working Groups  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About the Working Groups About the Working Groups The BNL Physics Department is organizing a series of meetings among theorists and experimenters from throughout the interested scientific community to focus on the central questions that will drive the next phase of RHIC physics. The November 2004 workshop was a kick-off meeting, to collect ideas and topics for future workshops, and assemble community-wide working groups. At the November workshop we had an extensive discussion of how the RHIC community should best organize itself to refine the science agenda for the next phase of RHIC research, to fully understand the science drivers for the RHIC II upgrades, and make a compelling scientific case for these upgrades to the broader nuclear physics community and to the young generation of RHIC scientists.

90

TEC Working Group Members | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Members Members TEC Working Group Members TEC members represent many different national, regional, tribal, state and local governmental, labor, industry and professional groups. To maximize the opportunity for broad-based input and information exchange, no single state, local or tribal governmental, or other entity is itself a member. Instead, membership is composed of organizations representing those perspectives. DOE programs participate in TEC by providing regular updates on key activities and provide resources and work on issues brought to the TEC by members or DOE. Members serve the group in three broad capacities: * Represent their constituent organizations; * Participate actively and consistently in TEC activities; and * Communicate the findings and recommendations of the group back to their

91

Blackout 2003: Electric System Working Group Technical Conference...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electric System Working Group Technical Conference - Comments and Recommendations Blackout 2003: Electric System Working Group Technical Conference - Comments and Recommendations...

92

Locally Led Conservation The Local Work Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group Mark Habiger NRCS #12;2 What Is "Locally Led ­ 5. Implementing solutions ­ 6. Measuring their success #12;3 The Locally Led Principle Locally led-Economic Concerns · Program Identification · Stakeholder Commitment #12;6 Who Leads the Locally Led Effort? · Local

93

Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Portland, Oregon - February 6-7, 2001 Portland, Oregon - February 6-7, 2001 Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) February 6-7, 2001 Portland, Oregon Meeting Summary The Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) held its 18 th semi-annual meeting February 6-7, 2001, in Portland, Oregon. Attending were 125 representatives from national, State, Tribal and local government organizations, industry and professional groups and other interested parties/DOE programs who meet to address a variety of issues related to DOE's radioactive materials transportation activities and provide continuing and improved coordination between DOE, other levels of government, and outside organizations with DOE transportation-related responsibilities. PLENARY I - TRANSCOM 2000 PRESENTATION (February 6)

94

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rail Rail TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail The Rail Topic Group has the responsibility to identify and discuss current issues and concerns regarding rail transportation of radioactive materials by the Department of Energy (DOE). The group's current task is to examine different aspects of rail transportation including inspections, tracking and radiation monitoring, planning and process, and review of lessons learned. Ultimately, the main goal for members will be to assist in the identification of potential rail routes for shipments to Yucca Mountain, in a manner that will contribute to a safe, dynamic, and flexible transportation system. The identification of potential routes from reactor sites and DOE facilities will serve as an important first step in transportation planning, examining alternative routes, and getting feedback

95

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Routing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Routing Routing TEC Working Group Topic Groups Routing ROUTING The Routing Topic Group has been established to examine topics of interest and relevance concerning routing of shipments of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) to a national repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada by highway, rail, and intermodal operations that could involve use of barges. Ultimately, the main goal for the topic group members will be to provide stakeholder perspectives and input to the Office of Logistics Management (OLM) in the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) for the identification of a national suite of routes to Yucca Mountain. The identification of a suite of routes will provide an advanced planning framework for State and Tribal

96

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Manual Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Manual Review Manual Review TEC Working Group Topic Groups Manual Review This group is responsible for the update of DOE Manual 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual. This manual was issued on September 23, 2002, and establishes a set of standard transportation practices for U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs to use in planning and executing offsite shipments of radioactive materials including radioactive waste. The manual was developed in response to recommendations from various DOE programs and external stakeholders. A writing group was convened to evaluate the shipping practices being used or planned for use throughout the Department, document them, and, where appropriate, standardize them. The results of this effort are reflected

97

EM QA Working Group September 2011 Notes | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Group September 2011 Notes Meeting minutes and notes from the EM QA Working Group video conference meeting held in September 2011. EM QA Working Group September 2011 Notes...

98

Cloud Properties Working Group Low Clouds Update  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Cloud Properties Working Group Cloud Properties Working Group Low Clouds Update Low Clouds Update Jennifer Comstock Jennifer Comstock Dave Turner Dave Turner Andy Andy Vogelmann Vogelmann Instruments Instruments 90/150 GHz microwave radiometer 90/150 GHz microwave radiometer Deployed during COPS AMF Deployed during COPS AMF Exploring calibration w/ DPR ( Exploring calibration w/ DPR ( Crewell Crewell & & L L ö ö hnert hnert ) ) See COPS Breakout, Wednesday evening See COPS Breakout, Wednesday evening 183 GHz (GVR) deployed at the NSA 183 GHz (GVR) deployed at the NSA Neural network algorithm to retrieve PWV & LWP (Maria Neural network algorithm to retrieve PWV & LWP (Maria Cadeddu Cadeddu ) ) Potential VAP candidate (RPWG) Potential VAP candidate (RPWG)

99

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MAY 3-4, 2006 MAY 3-4, 2006 ATLANTA, GEORGIA INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) held its Spring 2006 meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, on May 3-4. A total of 77 individuals attended the meeting. Participants included officials from Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) representatives, other Federal agencies, national laboratories, the utility industry, and representatives from energy-related organizations. The working group is a joint effort between FEMP and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The Spring 2006 FUPWG meeting was hosted by Atlanta Gas and Light. The agenda included the following presentations:

100

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 Report Page 1 of 26 3 Report Page 1 of 26 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting May 22-23, 2013 Hosted by PG&E San Francisco, CA Meeting Record The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The FUPWG meeting was held in San Francisco, CA on May 22-23 and was attended by 203 professionals: 52 Federal agency/lab representatives 62 utility officials 89 representatives from energy-related organizations An additional 45 professionals participated in the Wednesday morning session via webinar. This was the first time a webinar option was offered. Feedback from the participants was very positive, especially from

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Research Highlights Sorted by Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Working Group Working Group Aerosol Life Cycle | Cloud Life Cycle | Cloud-Aerosol-Precipitation Interactions | Aerosol | Cloud Modeling | Cloud Properties | Radiative Processes Aerosol Life Cycle 2013 Bhattacharya, A. Wildfires Lead to More Warming Than Climate Models Predict, a New Mexico Fire Study Reports ASR Fast, J. . Development and Validation of a Black Carbon Mixing State Resolved Three-Dimensional Model ARM ASR Gilles, M., Moffet, R. Spectro-microscopic Measurements of Carbonaceous Aerosol Aging in Central California ARM ASR Kafle, D. N., Coulter, R. L. Micropulse Lidar-Derived Aerosol Optical Depth Climatology at ARM Sites Worldwide ARM Keppel-Aleks, G. Determining the Future of CO2 Using an Earth System Model ARM Li, Z. A Mixed Bag of Aerosols over Northeastern China ARM

102

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Report Page 1 of 18 2 Report Page 1 of 18 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting April 11-12, 2012 Hosted by AGL Resources Jekyll Island, GA Meeting Record The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The FUPWG meeting held in Jekyll Island, GA, on April 11 -12 was attended by 222 professionals: * 59 utility officials * 52 federal agency representatives * 10 national laboratory representatives * 101 representatives from energy-related organizations The complete meeting participant list can be found in Appendix A and the meeting agenda in Appendix B.

103

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Report Page 1 of 18 2 Report Page 1 of 18 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting October 16-17, 2012 Hosted by Alabama Power Mobile, Alabama Meeting Record The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The FUPWG meeting held in Mobile, AL, on October 16-17 was attended by 179 professionals: 55 utility officials 39 federal agency representatives 10 national laboratory representatives 75 representatives from energy-related organizations The complete meeting participant list can be found in Appendix A and the meeting agenda in Appendix B.

104

Summary of the Physics Opportunities Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Physics Opportunities Working Group was convened with the rather general mandate to explore physic opportunities that may arise as new accelerator technologies and facilities come into play. Five topics were considered during the workshop: QED at critical field strength, novel positron sources, crystal accelerators, suppression of beamstrahlung, and muon colliders. Of particular interest was the sense that a high energy muon collider might be technically feasible and certainly deserves serious study.

Chen, Pisin [Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA (United States); McDonald, K.T. [Princeton Univ., NJ (United States). Joseph Henry Labs.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

105

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010 ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010 DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010 Minutes of DOE-EERE Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010...

106

September 2012, 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. March 2012. 10 CFR 851 Workshop was held in conjunction with the 2012 Chemical Management Workshop. 2. Communication tools to enhance 10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program (WSHP) compliance updated: Requirements checklist distributed across DOE complex and on the 10 CFR 851 website; DOE Guide 440.1-1B to include technical clarifications. 3. Aug 7. A WG teleconference to reconfirm the actions described in the charter and to discuss the need to identify areas for the Work Groups next efforts. Near Term Goals/Activities: 1. Samples of acceptable WSHP programs (including ones based on ISM) will be posted on the 851 web site. 2. Teaming of HS-10, NTC, NIEHS, HAMMER to: Develop and/or identify

107

US - Brazil Binational Energy Working Group Joint Action Plan...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

US - Brazil Binational Energy Working Group Joint Action Plan US - Brazil Binational Energy Working Group Joint Action Plan brazilactionplan7202010.pdf More Documents &...

108

EM QA Working Group September 2011 Meeting Materials | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

PowerPoint presentations and reference material used in the EM QA Working Group video conference meeting held in September 2011. EM QA Working Group September 2011 Meeting...

109

Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop: Code for Hydrogen Pipelines...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pipeline Working Group Workshop: Code for Hydrogen Pipelines Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop: Code for Hydrogen Pipelines Code for Hydrogen Piping and Pipelines. B31...

110

SEAB Endorsement of Office of Science Working Group | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

SEAB Endorsement of Office of Science Working Group SEAB Endorsement of Office of Science Working Group This memorandum from SEAB presents the recommendation from the Task Force on...

111

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group: Atlanta Gas Light...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Group: Atlanta Gas Light Resources Federal Utility Partnership Working Group: Atlanta Gas Light Resources Presentation-given at the April 2012 Federal Utility Partnership Working...

112

2012 Fuel Cycle MPACT Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Site Site Hydrogen Research Center 301 Gateway Drive Aiken, SC 29803 Accommodations Country Inn & Suites Aiken 3270 Whiskey Road Aiken, SC 29803 (803) 649-4024 RESERVATIONS: The cut-off date for guest room block reservations is Wednesday, February 22, 2012. We have a block of rooms reserved at this hotel at the government per diem rate of $86.00 per night. Please reference DOE -NE Fuel Cycle MPACT Working Group Meeting when making your reservations to the get the government rate. Reservations will be by individual call-in, per your institutional protocol. Here is a listing of other hotels that offer government room rates. Please note that we do not have rooms reserved at the list locations, only Country Inn & Suites in Aiken. Maps Maps to SRNL from Columbia, Aiken, and Augusta

113

DOE Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Pipeline Pipeline Working Group Workshop August 31, 2005 Augusta, Georgia Hydrogen Pipeline Experience Presented By: LeRoy H. Remp Lead Project Manager Pipeline Projects ppt00 3 Hydrogen Pipeline - Scope of Presentation Only those systems that are regulated by DOT in the US, DOT delegated state agency, or other federal regulatory authority. Cross property of third party and/or public properties for delivery to customers. Does not include in-plant or in-house hydrogen piping. Does not include piping (aboveground or underground) that delivers to a customer if all property is owned and controlled by Air Products and the customer. ppt00 4 Pipeline Photos ppt00 5 Pipeline Photos ppt00 6 Pipeline Photos ppt00 7 Pipeline Photos ppt00 8 Pipeline Photos ppt00 9 Overview of North American

114

Working Group Report: Lattice Field Theory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is the report of the Computing Frontier working group on Lattice Field Theory prepared for the proceedings of the 2013 Community Summer Study ("Snowmass"). We present the future computing needs and plans of the U.S. lattice gauge theory community and argue that continued support of the U.S. (and worldwide) lattice-QCD effort is essential to fully capitalize on the enormous investment in the high-energy physics experimental program. We first summarize the dramatic progress of numerical lattice-QCD simulations in the past decade, with some emphasis on calculations carried out under the auspices of the U.S. Lattice-QCD Collaboration, and describe a broad program of lattice-QCD calculations that will be relevant for future experiments at the intensity and energy frontiers. We then present details of the computational hardware and software resources needed to undertake these calculations.

Blum, T.; et al.,

2013-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

115

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Chairman's Corner  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Chairman's Corner from May 22, 2013.

116

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update on May 22, 2013.

117

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2005 Hydrogen Pipeline 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on AddThis.com... Publications Program Publications Technical Publications Educational Publications Newsletter Program Presentations

118

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Transport Modeling Transport Modeling Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on AddThis.com... Key Activities Plans, Implementation, & Results Accomplishments Organization Chart & Contacts Quick Links Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Fuel Cells Technology Validation

119

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies Project Planning & Implementation Project Assistance Resource Maps & Screening Tools

120

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2007 Hydrogen Pipeline 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on AddThis.com... Publications Program Publications Technical Publications Educational Publications Newsletter Program Presentations

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interagency Interagency Sustainability Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Basics Federal Requirements Existing Buildings New Construction & Major Renovations

122

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Water Electrolysis Water Electrolysis Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on AddThis.com... Key Activities Plans, Implementation, & Results Accomplishments Organization Chart & Contacts Quick Links Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Fuel Cells Technology Validation

123

T2 working group summary report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The T2 Working Group has reviewed and discussed the issues and challenges of a wide range of magnet technologies: superconducting magnets using NbTi, Nb{sub 3}Sn and HTS conductor with fields ranging from 2-15 T and permanent magnets up to 4 T. The development time of these technologies varies significantly, but all are considered viable, providing an unprecedented variety of choice that can be determined by a balance of cost and application requirements. One of the most significant advances since Snowmass '96 is the increased development and utilization of Nb{sub 3}Sn. All of the current US magnet programs (BNL, FNAL, LBNL, and Texas A and M) have programs using Nb{sub 3}Sn. There are also active programs in HTS development at BNL and LBNL. A DOE/HEP sponsored program to increase the performance and reduce the cost of Nb{sub 3}Sn is in its second year. The program has already made significant advances. The current funding for this program is $500k/year and an increase to $2M has been proposed for FY02.

S. Caspi et al.

2002-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

124

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Security Key Documents | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TG Work Plan August 7, 2006 Security Lessons Learned Document August 2, 2006 Security Module STG Terms and Definitions from DOE 470.4 More Documents & Publications TEC Working...

125

Modeling transparency and collaborativeness in distributed work groups  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Transparency and collaborativeness are two essential features required for dependability. These two issues in social groups are not well studied. The present paper studies these two aspects in distributed work group environment such as Self Help Groups ... Keywords: SHG, collaboration, distributed work groups, self help group, transparency

A. B. Sagar

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Catalysis Working Group | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

of the main focus areas of research and development activities of DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program. In particular, DOE is seeking novel transformative research leading to...

127

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group: Welcome to Portland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Welcome to Portland Mike Weedall Vice President for Energy Efficiency Bonneville Power Administration FUPWG Spring Meeting Portland, Oregon April 20-21, 2011 Slide 2 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Bonneville Power Slide 3 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N BPA's Service Area Slide 4 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Energy Efficiency Pays * BPA helps our customers encourage energy

128

EM QA Working Group September 2011 Notes  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

management expectations and will be providing the contractor information soon. Ken Armstrong noted that the records group at the EMCBC would like to participate and provide some...

129

High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

membranes. He discussed the motivation for the work; electrochemistry and mechanical loads co-exist but are usually modeled separately. Additionally, there is a concern...

130

HSS Work Group Leadership Meetings: Transition Elements | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Group Leadership Meetings: Transition Elements Work Group Leadership Meetings: Transition Elements HSS Work Group Leadership Meetings: Transition Elements Meeting Dates: November 13 - 15, 2012 This HSS Focus Group Work Group telecom was held with the Work Group Co-Leads to discuss change elements and strategic direction to support accelerated efforts to advancing progress, productivity and performance within each of the Work Groups. Although current roles within all of the Work Groups and Focus Group efforts remain the same, the addition of centralized leadership and oversight by representatives (2) of the Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board are established. Meeting Summaries 851 Implementation Meeting Summary Strategic Initiatives Meeting Summary Workforce Retention Meeting Summary

131

2014-07-08 Issuance: ASRAC Manufactured Housing Working Group...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7-08 Issuance: ASRAC Manufactured Housing Working Group; Notice of Membership 2014-07-08 Issuance: ASRAC Manufactured Housing Working Group; Notice of Membership This document is a...

132

2014-07-08 Issuance: ASRAC Regional Enforcement Working Group...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7-08 Issuance: ASRAC Regional Enforcement Working Group; Notice of Membership 2014-07-08 Issuance: ASRAC Regional Enforcement Working Group; Notice of Membership This document is a...

133

Catalysis Working Group Kick-Off Meeting Agenda  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

1 Catalysis Working Group 2012 Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Arlington, VA - May 14, 2012 Catalysis Working Group Kick-off Meeting...

134

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting: Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy; DOE; Federal Energy Management Program; FEMP; Federal Utility Partnership Working Group; FUPWG; Spring 2012

135

Agenda for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This agenda provides information about the Agenda for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting on September 14, 2006.

136

High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting, May 14, 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This agenda provides information about the High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting on May 14, 2007 in Arlington, Va.

137

Category:Wind Working Group Toolkit | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wind Working Group Toolkit Wind Working Group Toolkit Jump to: navigation, search In 1999, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) launched the Wind Powering America (WPA) initiative to educate, engage, and enable critical stakeholders to make informed decisions about how wind energy contributes to the U.S. electricity supply. State Wind Working Groups used Wind Powering America's State Wind Working Group Handbook to serve their states, in conjunction with their own methods and outreach materials. This updated wiki-based Wind Working Group Toolkit provides links to information, methods, and resources. This wiki is a work in progress, and we welcome your contributions. See the Wind Working Group Toolkit home page for an outline of topics. Pages in category "Wind Working Group Toolkit"

138

LEDSGP/about/working-groups | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

LEDSGP/about/working-groups LEDSGP/about/working-groups < LEDSGP‎ | about Jump to: navigation, search LEDSGP Logo.png Advancing climate-resilient low emission development around the world Home About Tools Expert Assistance Events Publications Join Us About How We Work > Regional Platforms > Working Groups LEDS GP Members Steering Committee Guiding Structure Contacts Working Groups The working groups of the LEDS Global Partnership develop and deliver technical resources, training, expert assistance, and match-making. And, they engage with current topical networks and convene virtual forums. Work Stream-LEDS Planning Processes Facilitator and Process Training for Research Leads Subnational Integration of LEDS Climate Resilience Integration to LEDS Work Stream-Analysis and Tools Development Impacts Assessment Working Group

139

Preliminary results of the APAC spills working group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Spills Working Group is one of 6 working groups under the DOE-DP Accident Phenomenology and Consequence (APAC) methodology evaluation program. Objectives are to assess methodologies available in this area, evaluate their adequacy for accident analysis at DOE facilities, identify development needs, and define standard practices to be followed in the analyses supporting facility safety basis documentation. The group focused on methodologies for estimating 4 types of spill source terms: liquid chemical spills and evaporation, pressurized liquid/gas releases, solid spills and resuspension/sublimation, and resuspension of particulate matter from liquid spills. Computer models were identified with capabilities for quantifying release rates or released amounts from spills, and a set of sample test problems was established for evaluating a specific model for some common or probable accident release scenarios. The group agreed on a set of recommended computer codes which are classified according to spill type and hazard category. Code results for a given problem varied by up to an order of magnitude; this is attributed to differences in how the physics and thermodynamics of the problems were treated by the models.

Brereton, S.; Hesse, D.; kalinich, D.; Lazaro, M.; Mubayi, V.; Shinn, J.

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Working Group Working Group The Renewable Energy Working Group provides a forum for Federal agencies and the renewable energy industry to exchange information on existing and planned projects, lessons learned, sources of project funds, and technologies. Guidance The Renewable Energy Working Group is charged with providing guidance about renewable energy regulatory requirements. Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Under EPAct 2005 and Executive Order 13423 Transmittal Letter Summarizing the Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Members Led by the Federal Energy Management Program, the Renewable Energy Working Group is made up of more than 100 Federal agency representatives, U.S. Department of Energy programs, and the renewable energy industry. Meetings

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

CHARTER INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORK GROUP  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CHARTER CHARTER INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORK GROUP Official Designation Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group ("Working Group") Purpose The purpose of the Working Group is to provide advice and recommendations to the Director of the Office of Indian Energy Policy & Programs (OIE) and the Secretary of Energy with respect to the strategic planning and implementation of OIE's energy resource, energy business and energy infrastructure development policy and programs. Objectives and Scope of Activities and Duties The Working Group shall: (a) make recommendations to the Director of the Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs

142

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 High Temperature 9 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on AddThis.com...

143

September 8, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Focus Group Focus Group HSS/Union Work Group Telecom September 8, 2011 Call-In: 301-903-0620 PROPOSED AGENDA Work Group Framework 3:00 - 4:00 pm EST Introductory Remarks...................................................Glenn Podonsky Meeting Purpose/Process..........................................Mari-Jo Campagnone Group Discussion Facilitation...............................................Pete Stafford Discussion...................................................................................All (1) Proposed Work Group Guidance (2) Proposed Charter Template (3) Work Group Matrix Next Steps..........................................Mari-Jo Campagnone/Pete Stafford Training Work Group 4:00 - 5:00 pm EST Introductory Remarks.....................................................Karen Boardman

144

November 13 - 15, 2012 HSS Work Group Leadership Meeting Summary - Work Force Retention  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Force Retention Work Group Work Force Retention Work Group Co-Lead Telecom November 16, 2012 DRAFT Discussion Overview Purpose: This HSS Focus Group Work Group telecom was held with the Work Group Co-Leads to discuss change elements and strategic direction to support accelerated efforts to advancing progress, productivity and performance within each of the Work Groups. Although current roles within all of the Work Groups and Focus Group efforts remain the same, the addition of centralized leadership and oversight by representatives (2) of the Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board are established. 1. Leadership Transition * Co-Leads will continue to provide technical functions * Functions of the Focus Group Program will remain the same. [Lily/Stephanie]

145

May 21, 2012, Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Work Force Retention Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Force Retention Work Group Charter Work Force Retention Work Group Charter In an ongoing effort to further the improvement of health, safety, environmental, and security performance within the Department, DOE is engaged in the establishment of work groups to pursue health and safety improvements across the DOE Complex. These efforts support DOE's responsibility as owner/manager to protect its greatest asset: the worker. The work groups support DOE's integrated safety management system and further DOE's best interests by fostering worker involvement and partnerships to maximize continuity of operations and the success of the Department's national security mission.

146

Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group The Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group (ICEIWG) has been established to work collaboratively with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs to assist in surveys, analysis, and recommendations related to those program and policy initiatives required to fulfill the DOE statutory authorizations and requirements of Title V of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. About ICEIWG Secretary Steven Chu announced the creation of the Working Group in May 2011 as an initiative to establish a working group of tribal government leaders and DOE to survey, analyze, and provide feedback to the DOE on its policy and program initiatives to meet the goals and programmatic

147

Fact Sheet: Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group Fact Sheet: Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group A fact sheet detailling the development of a Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group to promote accelerated deployment of solar and wind technologies by implementing recommendations from the MEF Technology Action Plan on Solar and Wind Technologies that was released by the Major Economies Forum Global Partnership in December 2009. The Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group will focus its initial work on developing a Global Atlas for Solar and Wind Energy and a corresponding Long-Term Strategy on Joint Capacity Building. Fact Sheet: Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group More Documents & Publications Renewables-Fact-Sheet.pdf Clean Energy Ministerial Press Fact Sheer

148

International Technical Working Group Round Robin Tests  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The goal of nuclear forensics is to develop a preferred approach to support illicit trafficking investigations. This approach must be widely understood and accepted as credible. The principal objectives of the Round Robin Tests are to prioritize forensic techniques and methods, evaluate attribution capabilities, and examine the utility of database. The HEU (Highly Enriched Uranium) Round Robin, and previous Plutonium Round Robin, have made tremendous contributions to fulfilling these goals through a collaborative learning experience that resulted from the outstanding efforts of the nine participating internal laboratories. A prioritized list of techniques and methods has been developed based on this exercise. Current work is focused on the extent to which the techniques and methods can be generalized. The HEU Round Robin demonstrated a rather high level of capability to determine the important characteristics of the materials and processes using analytical methods. When this capability is combined with the appropriate knowledge/database, it results in a significant capability to attribute the source of the materials to a specific process or facility. A number of shortfalls were also identified in the current capabilities including procedures for non-nuclear forensics and the lack of a comprehensive network of data/knowledge bases. The results of the Round Robin will be used to develop guidelines or a ''recommended protocol'' to be made available to the interested authorities and countries to use in real cases.

Dudder, Gordon B.; Hanlen, Richard C.; Herbillion, Georges M.

2003-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About About Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High

150

International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development and Financing of New Nuclear Projects International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development and Financing of New Nuclear Projects December 15, 2009 - 1:09pm Addthis VIENNA, AUSTRIA - The multi-nation Infrastructure Development Working Group (IDWG) held its fifth meeting and also a workshop on the financing of international nuclear power projects in Vienna, Austria, on December 9-10, 2009. An official from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) led the working group meeting. "As a key component of the international Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) program, the Infrastructure Development Working Group supports the safe, secure and responsible use of nuclear energy," said

151

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About About Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High

152

Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library General: Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting Abstract Abstract unavailable. Authors John Snow and Fausto Batini Published Enel Nort America, 04/22/2008 DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http://crossref.org Online Internet link for Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting Citation John Snow,Fausto Batini. 04/22/2008. Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting. Cedar City, UT. Enel Nort America. 24p. Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Enel_North_America_Utah_Geothermal_Working_Group_Meeting&oldid=680551" Categories: References Geothermal References

153

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About About Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High

154

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About About Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High

155

DOE Durability Working Group October 2012 Meeting Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Meeting agenda from the Fall 2012 Durability Working Group Meeting sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Program.

156

Security Communications Protocol Ad Hoc Working Group | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Protocol Ad Hoc Working Group More Documents & Publications Overview for Newcomers Isotope Program Transportation Shipping Radioactive Waste by Rail from Brookhaven National...

157

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting Financing Session Compilation  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the Space Coast Next Generation Solar Energy Center given at the Spring 2009 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Biloxi, Mississippi.

158

Joint Working Group for Fusion Safety | Princeton Plasma Physics...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Environment, Safety & Health Environmental Management System Joint Working Group for Fusion Safety Procurement Division Technology Transfer Furth Plasma Physics Library Contact...

159

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting: Summary Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The objective of these biannual Working Group meetings is to bring together the DOE research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes.

160

November 13 - 15, 2012 HSS Work Group Leadership Meeting Summary...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Work Group improvementre-direction needs * Focus on how to get portability, standardization and quality out of the worker health and safety training much progress has...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

DOE Durability Working Group February 2013 Meeting Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Meeting agenda from the February 2013 Durability Working Group Meeting sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Office.

162

Hydrogen Storage Systems Anlaysis Working Group Meeting, December 12, 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document provides a summary of the Hydrogen Storage Systems Anlaysis Working Group meeting in December 2006 in Washington, D.C.

163

Annual Energy Outlook 2014 Electricity Working Group Meeting  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Analysis Team Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Office of Energy Analysis WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS...

164

Annual Energy Outlook 2014: Electricity Working Group Meeting...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Electricity Analysis Team Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Office of Energy Analysis Annual Energy Outlook 2014: Electricity Working Group Meeting July...

165

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group 2011 Meeting: Washington...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Working Group (FUPWG) meeting-provides an overview of federal government goals and status, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) update, and utility energy services...

166

Webinar: ASRAC Commercial/Industrial Pumps Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE is conducting a public meeting and webinar for the Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee's (ASRAC) Commercial and Industrial Pumps Working Group. For more information,...

167

Second AEO2014 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

TEAM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION and NATURAL GAS MARKETS TEAMS SUBJECT: Second AEO2014 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary (presented September 26, 2013) Attendees: Robert...

168

Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) Welcome: The Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) is established to assist DOE in the appropriate and effective use of quantitative risk assessment in nuclear safety related activities. The activities of the group will help DOE ensure that risk assessments supporting nuclear safety decisions are conducted in a consistent manner, of appropriate quality, properly tailored to the needs of the decisions they are intended to support and documented. The RWG will also assist DOE in assessing the adequacy of available risk assessment tools and guidance supporting nuclear safety at its nuclear facilities.

169

APS Guideline for Work Area Demarcation, Warnings, and Controls  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Work Area Demarcation, Warnings, and Controls Work Area Demarcation, Warnings, and Controls Introduction By means of the practices described below, CAT/XSD hopes to reduce risks resulting from persons inadvertently entering a hazardous work area. Creating an Exclusion Zone When performing work that could put others at risk, you must demarcate an exclusion zone around your work. This is typically done with yellow and black plastic "barricade tape." Use signs, placards, and other postings as necessary to warn others not to enter the demarcated area unless they have business in the area and have authorization (blanket or occasion-specific) to enter. Where appropriate, post special requirements for entry. Entering an Exclusion Zone Do not enter unless you meet all of the following conditions:

170

Working Group III: Threats Due to Climate Change — Global Problems in A Regional Context  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The expertise of the participants in the Working Group primarily encompassed the area stretching from Eastern Europe through the Caucasus to the states of Central Asia. This region is the focus of this report....

P. Robinson

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

Waste site grouping for 200 Areas soil investigations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to identify logical waste site groups for characterization based on criteria established in the 200 Areas Soil Remediation Strategy (DOE-RL 1996a). Specific objectives of the document include the following: finalize waste site groups based on the approach and preliminary groupings identified in the 200 Areas Soil Remediation Strategy; prioritize the waste site groups based on criteria developed in the 200 Areas Soil Remediation Strategy; select representative site(s) that best represents typical and worse-case conditions for each waste group; develop conceptual models for each waste group. This document will serve as a technical baseline for implementing the 200 Areas Soil Remediation Strategy. The intent of the document is to provide a framework, based on waste site groups, for organizing soil characterization efforts in the 200 Areas and to present initial conceptual models.

NONE

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

172

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Conference Call Summaries Rail Topic  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summaries Rail Summaries Rail Topic Group TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Conference Call Summaries Rail Topic Group Rail Topic Group May 17, 2007 January 16, 2007 August 31, 2006 July 27, 2006 June 8, 2006 April 20, 2006 March 9, 2006 January 26, 2006 November 9, 2005 September 15, 2005 April 28, 2005 March 24, 2005 February 24, 2005 January 27, 2005 December 16, 2004 October 28, 2004 May 17, 2004 June 2, 2003 June 26, 2002 March 26, 1999 November 13, 1998 Meeting October 6, 1998 Meeting September 11, 1998 Meeting June 22, 1998 Meeting May 27, 1998 Meeting November 3, 1997 Meeting September 18, 1997 Meeting More Documents & Publications TEC Working Group Topic Groups Routing Conference Call Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Meeting Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Conference Call Summaries Inspections

173

RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP The Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) is established to assist the Department of Energy (DOE) with the appropriate and effective use of quantitative risk assessment in nuclear safety-related activities. The activities of the group will help DOE make sure that risk assessments supporting nuclear safety decisions are: conducted in a consistent manner; of appropriate quality; properly documented; and properly tailored to the needs of the decisions they are intended to support. The RWG will also assist DOE in assessing the adequacy of available tools and guidance necessary to support nuclear safety at its nuclear facilities. RWG_Charter_March_2012.pdf

174

International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Financing of New Nuclear Projects Financing of New Nuclear Projects International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development and Financing of New Nuclear Projects December 15, 2009 - 1:09pm Addthis VIENNA, AUSTRIA - The multi-nation Infrastructure Development Working Group (IDWG) held its fifth meeting and also a workshop on the financing of international nuclear power projects in Vienna, Austria, on December 9-10, 2009. An official from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) led the working group meeting. "As a key component of the international Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) program, the Infrastructure Development Working Group supports the safe, secure and responsible use of nuclear energy," said Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Warren F. Miller, Jr. "The group

175

NREL: News - Solar Working Group Releases Standard Contracts  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

513 513 Solar Working Group Releases Standard Contracts NREL-organized group aims to improve access to low-cost capital November 5, 2013 A working group representing solar industry stakeholders has developed standard contracts that should help lower transaction costs and make it easier to access low-cost financing for residential and commercial solar power projects. The Solar Access to Public Capital (SAPC) working group, assembled by the Energy Department's National Renewable Energy Laboratory, is a consortium of solar energy developers, law firms, financiers and analysts with expertise in solar energy projects. The contracts cover residential leases and commercial power purchase agreements (PPAs). The working group members recognized that customizable contract templates could improve consumer transparency, increase

176

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Project Funding » Utility Energy Service Contracts » Federal Project Funding » Utility Energy Service Contracts » Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Federal Utility Partnership Working Group October 7, 2013 - 2:31pm Addthis The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) establishes partnerships and facilitates communications among Federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. The group develops strategies to implement cost-effective energy efficiency and water conservation projects through utility incentive programs at Federal sites. The mission and objectives of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group are to: Enhance existing or foster new partnerships between Federal agencies and their servicing utilities to identify, develop, and implement cost-effective energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy

177

GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting December 10, 2008 - 5:11pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - Representatives from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) participated this week in the third Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Infrastructure Development Working Group (IDWG), underscoring the Department's commitment to ensuring that global expansion of civilian nuclear power is done safely and securely, while reducing the risk of nuclear proliferation and responsibly managing waste. The IDWG, held December 8th and 9th in Vienna, Austria, includes over 70 participants from 22 countries working to support the sharing of educational resources, the promotion of technical educational opportunities and the establishment of

178

GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting December 10, 2008 - 5:11pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - Representatives from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) participated this week in the third Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Infrastructure Development Working Group (IDWG), underscoring the Department's commitment to ensuring that global expansion of civilian nuclear power is done safely and securely, while reducing the risk of nuclear proliferation and responsibly managing waste. The IDWG, held December 8th and 9th in Vienna, Austria, includes over 70 participants from 22 countries working to support the sharing of educational resources, the promotion of technical educational opportunities and the establishment of

179

Hydrgoen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Summary Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting 2007 Hydrogen Program Annual Review Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, VA May 17, 2007 SUMMARY REPORT Compiled by Romesh Kumar Argonne National Laboratory and Elvin Yuzugullu Sentech, Inc. June 28, 2007 SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting May 17, 2007 Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, VA Meeting Objectives This meeting was one of a continuing series of biannual meetings of this Working Group. The objective of these meetings is to bring together the DOE research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information exchange and to update the researchers on related developments within the DOE program. A major thrust of these meetings is to leverage expertise, complement related work of different individuals and

180

Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System Working Group Charter  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

DRAFT 2011 DRAFT 2011 DRAFT 2011 Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System Working Group Charter VERSION: 0 REVISION DATE: May 2011 Approver Name Title Signature Date DRAFT 2011 DRAFT 2011 NMMSS Working Group Charter PURPOSE The NMMSS Working Group (NWG) serves as an open forum for discussion of issues and concerns from the NMMSS User community. The Committee will provide an interface between NMMSS users, NMMSS sponsors and the NMMSS project staff. Activities may include: Identifying user needs Identifying deficiencies in reporting capabilities Recommending upgrades to software capabilities Recommending priorities for modifications Recommending enhancements to data Minimizing the reporting burden on the reporting community

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Energy technology assessments for energy security -- Working Group report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the first phase of the evaluation process the group identified technology areas that are clearly important for reducing US vulnerability to oil supply disruptions. The important technologies were then evaluated against the following specific criteria: Additions to world oil and gas reserves outside the Middle East; increase in efficiency in the oil consuming sectors; displacement of petroleum-based fuels; reduction in demand for oil-fueled transportation; increase in the ability to switch quickly away from petroleum based fuels; increases in domestic and international oil stocks; reduction in world oil demand; and additions to domestic, non-petroleum electrical generating capacity (important in the ultimate term). The technology areas deemed by the members of the working group to be most important are: (1) In the near term, technologies related to improved recovery of natural gas, the conversion of natural gas to liquids, advanced liquefaction of coal, the development of alternatively fueled vehicles, automobiles and light truck improvements to increase efficiency, and vehicles that operate on alternative fuels. (2) In the long term, these technologies, as well as those related to hydrogen production, storage and utilization, biomass derived fuels, electric and hybrid vehicles, building heating and cooling using solar energy, more efficient appliances, improved HVAC, and advanced building materials and envelopes were also judged to be most important. (3) In the ultimate term (>2030) other technologies have the possibility to join with these to increase energy security. These are improved oil and gas exploration and extraction, heavy oil and hydrocarbon conversion, gas recovery from unconventional sources, advanced fission reactors and fuel cycles, solar generation of electricity, and fusion energy. An increase in US electrical generating capacity is also thought to bear directly on energy security in this time-frame.

Lamont, A.D.; Schock, R.N.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

US-India Energy Dialogue: Coal Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

US-India Energy Dialogue: US-India Energy Dialogue: Coal Working Group US-India Energy Dialogue: Coal Working Group On May 31, 2005, then-U.S. Secretary of Energy, Dr. Samuel W. Bodman and Dr. Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Deputy Chairman Planning Commission of India, launched a new Energy Dialogue. The Energy Dialogue builds upon the broad range of existing energy cooperation between India and the United States, as well as develops new avenues of collaboration. The Energy Dialogue includes working groups in the areas of coal, oil and gas, nuclear and renewable resources, electric power generation and energy efficiency. Read the Coal Working Group Work Plan The Coal Working Group is chaired by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy, and India's Ministry of Coal. The objective of the CWG

183

Federal Technology Deployment Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technologies » Technology Deployment » Federal Technology Technologies » Technology Deployment » Federal Technology Deployment Working Group Federal Technology Deployment Working Group October 7, 2013 - 9:11am Addthis Energy Department Announces Interagency Committee to Increase Use of Clean Energy Technologies in Federal Facilities The Senior Executive Committee for Technology Deployment, a subcommittee of the Interagency Technology Deployment Working Group, brings together leaders of technology deployment programs from across the federal government to implement the Obama Administration's comprehensive strategy to reduce energy costs in agency facilities, while boosting American competitiveness in the global clean energy race. Learn more. The Federal Technology Deployment Working Group helps Federal agencies evaluate and deploy new and underutilized technologies.

184

International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Needs Needs International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development and Needs June 2, 2010 - 12:02pm Addthis VIENNA, Austria - The multi-nation Infrastructure Development Working Group (IDWG) of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) held its sixth meeting on May 26-27, 2010, in Vienna, Austria. The two-day event included workshops on nuclear energy regulatory agency engagement and the infrastructure needs for international nuclear fuel service frameworks. Officials from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.K. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority co-chaired the working group meeting. "As a key component of the international Global Nuclear Energy Partnership program, the Infrastructure Development Working Group focuses

185

Meetings of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Meetings of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meetings of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meetings of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group October 7, 2013 - 2:33pm Addthis The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meets twice per year to share success stories, information on Federal Energy Management Program activities and other business. Upcoming Meetings FUPWG Winter 2014 January 14-15, 2014 (postponed from November 6-7, 2013) Golden, Colorado Co-hosted by Xcel Energy and NREL Recent Meetings FUPWG Spring 2013 May 22-23, 2013 San Francisco, California Hosted by Pacific Gas and Electric Meeting Agenda and Presentations Meeting Report FUPWG Fall 2012 October 16-17, 2012 Mobile, Alabama Hosted by Alabama Power Meeting Agenda and Presentations Meeting Report Past Meetings Notes FUPWG Spring 2012: Jekyll Island, Georgia

186

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting: Summary Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Argonne DC Offices L'Enfant Plaza, Washington, DC December 4, 2007 SUMMARY REPORT Compiled by Romesh Kumar Argonne National Laboratory and Kristin Deason Sentech, Inc. January 16, 2008 SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting December 4, 2007 Argonne DC Offices, L'Enfant Plaza, Washington, DC Meeting Objectives This meeting was one of a continuing series of biannual meetings of the Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group (SSAWG). The objective of these meetings is to bring together the DOE research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information exchange and to update the researchers on related developments within the DOE program. A major thrust of these meetings is to leverage

187

North American Energy Work Group Releases Updated Trilateral Energy Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Group Releases Updated Trilateral Energy Work Group Releases Updated Trilateral Energy Report North American Energy Work Group Releases Updated Trilateral Energy Report March 2, 2006 - 11:35am Addthis WASHINGTON , D.C. - U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman today released a report entitled North America - The Energy Picture II, which continues to show that North America is one of the world's most important regions for energy - producing about one-fourth of that global energy supply and consuming about one-third of the world's commercial energy. The report was created as a joint effort under the North American Energy Working Group (NAEWG) of the trilateral Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) represented by the three countries. "This impressive report demonstrates the strength and vitality of the North

188

Transportation Protocols Working Group First Conference Call March 1, 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Protocols Working Group First Conference Call March 1, 1999 Protocols Working Group First Conference Call March 1, 1999 Conference Call Summary The first conference call of the Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC/WG) DOE Transportation Protocols Working Group was held at 3:00 p.m. Eastern time on Monday March 1, 1999. The session was led by Mona Williams, DOE/NTP-Albuquerque. Other participants included Bill Lemeshewsky, DOE/RW; Ellen Ott, DOE/GC; Elizabeth Helvey, JK Research Associates; Chris Wells, SSEB; Lisa Sattler, CSG-MW, Elissa Turner, DOE/RW; Chris Wentz, New Mexico; Carl Guidice, DOE/EM; Jim Cruickshank, DOE/EM, Elmer Naples, DOE/NR; Fred Butterfield, DOE/EM; and Alex Thrower, UETC. Ms. Williams first indicated that notes from the Jacksonville meeting had been prepared and circulated for comment. She asked if there were

189

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group- Utility Interconnection Panel  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation—given at at the Fall 2012 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting—discusses solar/photovoltaic (PV) projects to connect with utility in California and their issues.

190

STAFFREPORT Prepared for the Bioenergy Interagency Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

STAFFREPORT Prepared for the Bioenergy Interagency Working Group: Air Resources Board 2010 2009 PROGRESS TO PLAN BIOENERGY ACTION PLAN FOR CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION #12, and et. al. 2010. 2009 Progress to Plan Bioenergy Action Plan for California. California Energy

191

Catalysis Working Group Kick-Off Meeting: May 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Information from the Catalysis Working Group kick-off meeting held May 14, 2012, in Arlington, Virginia, in conjunction with the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting.

192

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting October 10, 2010 Agenda 6 pm Welcome and introductory comments Debbie Myers (Argonne) and Rod Borup (Los Alamos) - co-chairs 6:15 pm...

193

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY INTERAGENCY WORKING GROUP ON MEDICAL RADIATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of the Interagency Working Group for the practice of diagnostic radiology by Federal agencies. Since the body . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Quality Assurance Equipment Operator Performance Patient Exposure Considerations DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Prescription of Dental X rays

194

Summary of Second AEO 2015 Working Group Meeting  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2016 reduction in the Investment Tax Credit from 30% to 10% resulted in the reduction in solar capacity growth post-2016. WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT...

195

Catalysis Working Group Kick-Off Meeting Agenda | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Kick-Off Meeting Agenda Agenda for the kick-off meeting of the U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Program's Catalysis Working Group, held May 14, 2012, in Arlington,...

196

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants October 7, 2013 - 3:22pm Addthis The following Federal agencies have participated in the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group or engaged in a utility energy service contract project. General Services Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Forest Service U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency U.S. Air Force U.S. Army U.S. Army National Guard U.S. Navy U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Bonneville Power Administration Federal Energy Management Program Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Pacific Northwest National Laboratory National Renewable Energy Laboratory

197

State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Fernald Preserve |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fernald Fernald Preserve State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Fernald Preserve July 12, 2013 - 11:28am Addthis On June 4 and 5, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) hosted the State and Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) at the Fernald Preserve in Ohio. This group-which receives support from the National Conference of State Legislatures-helps ensure that DOE facilities and sites are operated and cleaned up in compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations and tribal rights. This was the STGWG's third visit to an LM site. In prior years the group visited Weldon Spring, Missouri, and Rocky Flats, Colorado. Members of the State and Tribal Government Working Group hike to the top of the On-Site Disposal Facility for full view of the Fernald Preserve.

198

FACT SHEET: MULTILATERAL SOLAR AND WIND WORKING GROUP  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FACT SHEET: MULTILATERAL SOLAR AND WIND WORKING GROUP At the Clean Energy Ministerial in Washington, D.C. on July 19 th and 20 th , ministers announced the development of a Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group to promote accelerated deployment of solar and wind technologies by implementing recommendations from the MEF Technology Action Plan on Solar and Wind Technologies that was released by the Major Economies Forum Global Partnership in December 2009. The

199

FACT SHEET: MULTILATERAL SOLAR AND WIND WORKING GROUP  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FACT SHEET: MULTILATERAL SOLAR AND WIND WORKING GROUP At the Clean Energy Ministerial in Washington, D.C. on July 19 th and 20 th , ministers announced the development of a Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group to promote accelerated deployment of solar and wind technologies by implementing recommendations from the MEF Technology Action Plan on Solar and Wind Technologies that was released by the Major Economies Forum Global Partnership in December 2009. The

200

Dealing with the effects of context mismatch in group work  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The context concept can be used with advantage in the area of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. In many studies, several forms of context have been used without explicit association to the context concept. This paper attempts to clarify the relationship ... Keywords: Awareness, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Context, Context framework, Contextual knowledge, Groupware

Marcos R. S. Borges; Patrick Brézillon; José A. Pino; Jean-Charles Pomerol

2007-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Minutes from Durability Working Group Kick-off meeting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Minutes from Durability Working Group (DWG) Kick-off Meeting 6/9/10 Contaminants Discussion on effect of air and system contaminants on performance and durability, initiated by S. Blanchet (Nuvera) Question of extent of impurity work in six newly-awarded durability projects represented at this meeting. None of the projects are specifically looking at the effect of system and air impurities on long- term performance degradation. New Argonne durability project does include task on effect of impurities introduced during catalyst synthesis on degradation mechanisms. Discussion on inclusion of newly-funded contaminant projects on durability working group - as these

202

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Fall 2011 Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 Report Page 1 of 18 1 Report Page 1 of 18 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting October 25-26, 2011 Hosted by Philadelphia Gas Works Philadelphia, PA Meeting Record The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The FUPWG meeting held in Philadelphia on October 25 and 26 was attended by 178 professionals from the following organizations: * 46 utility officials * 39 federal agency representatives * 11 national laboratory representatives * 82 representatives from energy-related organizations

203

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group Charter, January 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP CHARTER January 2012 PURPOSE: To support effective and appropriate utilization of risk assessment tools in nuclear safety applications at defense nuclear facilities. OBJECTIVES: The Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) is established to assist the Department of Energy (DOE) with the appropriate and effective use of quantitative risk assessment in nuclear safety-related activities. The activities of the group will help DOE make sure that risk assessments supporting nuclear safety decisions are: conducted in a consistent manner; of appropriate quality; properly documented; and properly tailored to the needs of the decisions they are intended to support. The RWG will also assist DOE in assessing the adequacy of available tools and

204

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG June 21, 2012 GOLDEN, COLORADO National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401 AGENDA MEETING ROOM - NREL ROOM 344C THURSDAY, JUNE 21, 2012 9:00am MEET IN HOTEL LOBBY Denver Marriott West Hotel 1717 Denver West Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401 The hotel will provide a shuttle to take the group to NREL. Please be in the hotel lobby by 9:00am. Continental breakfast will be served onsite. 9:30am - 12:00pm WELCOME, INTRODUCTIONS & REVIEW OF AGENDA Tracey LeBeau, Director, U.S. DOE Office of Indian Energy INTRODUCTION OF ICEIWG MEMBERS New and current working group members will have the opportunity to introduce themselves and to share their tribe's expertise and interests in Indian

205

Chemical Safety Vulnerability Working Group report. Volume 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Chemical Safety Vulnerability (CSV) Working Group was established to identify adverse conditions involving hazardous chemicals at DOE facilities that might result in fires or explosions, release of hazardous chemicals to the environment, or exposure of workers or the public to chemicals. A CSV Review was conducted in 148 facilities at 29 sites. Eight generic vulnerabilities were documented related to: abandoned chemicals and chemical residuals; past chemical spills and ground releases; characterization of legacy chemicals and wastes; disposition of legacy chemicals; storage facilities and conditions; condition of facilities and support systems; unanalyzed and unaddressed hazards; and inventory control and tracking. Weaknesses in five programmatic areas were also identified related to: management commitment and planning; chemical safety management programs; aging facilities that continue to operate; nonoperating facilities awaiting deactivation; and resource allocations. Volume 2 consists of seven appendices containing the following: Tasking memorandums; Project plan for the CSV Review; Field verification guide for the CSV Review; Field verification report, Lawrence Livermore National Lab.; Field verification report, Oak Ridge Reservation; Field verification report, Savannah River Site; and the Field verification report, Hanford Site.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

Improvement of modelling capabilities for assessing urban contamination : The EMRAS Urban Remediation Working Group.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Urban Remediation Working Group of the International Atomic Energy Agency's Environmental Modeling for Radiation Safety (EMRAS) programme was established to improve modeling and assessment capabilities for radioactively contaminated urban situations, including the effects of countermeasures. An example of the Working Group's activities is an exercise based on Chernobyl fallout data in Ukraine, which has provided an opportunity to compare predictions among several models and with available measurements, to discuss reasons for discrepancies, and to identify areas where additional information would be helpful.

Thiessen, K. M.; Batandjieva, B.; Andersson, K. G.; Arkhipov, A.; Charnock, T. W.; Gallay, F.; Gaschak, S.; Golikov, V.; Hwang, W. T.; Kaiser, J. C.; Kamboj, S.; Steiner, M.; Tomas, J.; Trifunovic, D.; Yu, C.; Ziemer, R. L.; Zlobenko, B.; Environmental Science Division; SENES Oak Ridge; IAEA; Riso National Lab.; Chernobyl Center for Nuclear Safety; Health Protection Agency; IRSN; Inst. of Radiation Hygene of the Ministry of Public Health, Russian Federation; KAERI, Republic of Korea; GSF, Germany; BfS, Germany; CPHR, Cuba; State Office for Radiation Protection, Croatia; AECL, Canada; National Academy of Science, Ukraine

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

207

May 21, 2012, Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Training Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

05-21-12 05-21-12 Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Training Work Group Charter In an ongoing effort to further the improvement of health, safety, environmental, and security performance within the Department, DOE is engaged in the establishment of Work Groups to pursue health and safety improvement across the DOE Complex. These efforts support DOE's responsibility as owner/manager to protect its greatest asset: the worker. The work groups support DOE's integrated safety management system and further DOE's best interests by fostering worker involvement and partnerships to maximize continuity of operations and the success of the Department's national security mission.

208

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

High Temperature Membrane Working Group High Temperature Membrane Working Group The High Temperature Membrane Working Group consists of government, industry, and university researchers interested in developing high temperature membranes for fuel cells. Description Technical Targets Meetings Contacts Description Polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells typically operate at temperatures no higher than 60°C-80°C due to structural limitations of the membrane. Operating PEM fuel cell stacks at higher temperatures (120°C for transportation and 150°C for stationary applications), however, would yield significant energy benefits. For example, heat rejection is easier at higher temperatures, which would allow use of smaller heat exchangers in fuel cell power systems. In addition, for reformate fuel cell systems, carbon monoxide (CO) tolerance of the stack is less problematic at higher temperatures, which would reduce the size requirements or possibly eliminate the need for some CO clean-up beds in the fuel processor.

209

State & Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Tribal Programs » State Tribal Programs » State & Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) State & Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) In April 1989, ten governors wrote a letter to then-Secretary of Energy Watkins, to express their concerns regarding the management, cleanup, and disposal of radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes at Department of Energy (DOE) facilities within or adjacent to their states boundaries. In May 1989, then-Secretary of Energy Watkins, invited each governor to appoint a representative to participate in the planning process for the Department's Five-Year Plan through membership in a State and Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG). The Secretary also invited representatives from the Yakama Indian Nation, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, the National Governors' Association, the National Conference of State

210

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG)Conference Call  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Conference Call Conference Call Minutes, February 20, 2010 Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG)Conference Call Minutes, February 20, 2010 Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group Charter - discussed who should sign and at what level the charter should be authorized. It was concluded that the Under Secretaries as the Central Technical Authorities and HS-1 should ultimately authorize the charter. It was recognized that having such high level approval of the charter would likely increase the time needed to finalize it, However, it was concluded that any delay would not impact activities because the business of the working group will move forward in the interim. Members should provide comments on current draft to Jim O'Brien (with cc to all members) by March 8 with the goal of

211

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 2007 Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FEDERAL UTILITY PARTNERSHIP WORKING GROUP MEETING NOVEMBER 28-29, 2007 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA HOSTED BY: SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) held its Fall 2007 meeting in San Diego, California on November 28-29. The meeting was hosted by San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) and was held at the Holiday Inn on the Bay. A total of 123 individuals attended the meeting, including at least 11 new members. Organizations represented included 48 utility officials, 6 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) representatives, 40 federal agency representatives, 8 national laboratory representatives, and 21 representatives from energy-related organizations. The working group is a joint effort between FEMP and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among

212

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG May 29, 2013 Wild Horse Pass Hotel and Casino Chandler, Arizona MEETING OVERVIEW The U.S. Department of Energy Office (DOE) of Indian Energy (IE) hosted an Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group (ICEIWG) Meeting on Wednesday, May 29, 2013 in Chandler, Arizona. IE welcomed reappointed and new members to ICEIWG. The ICEIWG meeting was held prior to the seventh Tribal Leader Forum on "Leveraging Tribal Renewable Resources to Support Military Energy Goals." Arizona tribal leaders and intertribal organization representatives were encouraged to attend this meeting.

213

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting: Summary Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Held in Conjunction with the DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, VA June 11, 2008 SUMMARY REPORT Compiled by Romesh Kumar Argonne National Laboratory and Elvin Yzugullu Sentech, Inc. July 18, 2008 SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting June 11, 2008 Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, VA Meeting Objectives This meeting was one of a continuing series of biannual meetings of the Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group (SSAWG). The objective of these meetings is to bring together the DOE research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information exchange and to update the researchers on related

214

July 10-11, 2012, HSS Focus Group Training Work Group - Meeting Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training Work Group Training Work Group Meeting Minutes July 10 & 11, 2012 The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Training Work Group met at the DOE National Training Center (NTC) in Albuquerque, NM on Tuesday, July 10 and Wednesday, July 11, 2012. The meeting was chaired by the Work Group co-chairs, Karen Boardman (HSS/NTC), Pete Stafford (AFL-CIO BCTD/CPWR), and Julie Johnston (EFCOG). Attachment 1 is the Meeting Agenda; Attachment 2 is a list of meeting attendees; and Attachment 3 is the proposed Radworker Training Reciprocity Program. July 10, 2012 Chronologic Meeting Summary: Following a Co-chair pre-meeting, Karen

215

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Section 180(c) Key Documents | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Section 180(c) Key Documents Section 180(c) Key Documents TEC Working Group Topic Groups Section 180(c) Key Documents Key Documents Briefing Package for Section 180(c) Implementation - July 2005 Executive Summary Introduction Appendix A - Funding Distribution Method Appendix B - Timing and Eligibility Appendix C - Allowable Activities/Training Appendix D - Definitions Appendix E - Pass-Through of Funds Appendix F - Contingency Re-Routing Appendix G - Policy on Rulemaking Appendix H - Funding Allocation Method Appendix I - State Fees Appendix J - Funding Operational Activities Appendix K - Matching Funds More Documents & Publications Implementation of Section 180(c) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act TEC Working Group Topic Groups Section 180(c) Meeting Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Tribal

216

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop 7 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop The Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group met Sept. 25-26, 2007, to review the progress and results of DOE-sponsored pipeline research and development (R&D) projects. More than 30 researchers and industry representatives shared their research results and discussed the current challenges and future goals for hydrogen pipeline R&D. One of the Pipeline Working Group's near-term goals involves developing standardized test methods and procedures and a round-robin testing plan to ensure consistent results. The workshop featured a review of the draft plan, presentations about the DOE-funded pipeline research projects, and facilitated discussion sessions. The DOE Fuel Cell Technologies Office sponsored the workshop. It was held at the Center for Hydrogen Research in conjunction with the Materials and Components for Hydrogen Infrastructure Codes and Standards Workshop, a joint venture between the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and Savannah River National Laboratory.

217

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Storage Systems Analysis Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Storage Systems Analysis Working Group The Storage Systems Analysis Working Group, launched in March 2005, provides a forum to facilitate research and communication of hydrogen storage-related analysis activities among researchers actively engaged in hydrogen storage systems analyses. The working group includes members from DOE, the national laboratories, industry, and academia. Description Technical Targets Meetings Contacts Description Hydrogen storage is a key enabling technology for the advancement of hydrogen and fuel cell power technologies in transportation, stationary, and portable power applications. One of the most challenging technical barriers known is how to efficiently store hydrogen on-board a vehicle to meet customer expectations of a driving range greater than 300 miles-as well as performance, safety, and cost-without impacting passenger or cargo space. The Department of Energy's hydrogen storage activity is coordinated through the "National Hydrogen Storage Project," with multiple university, industry, and federal laboratory partners focused on research and development of on-board vehicular hydrogen storage technologies. This research also has components applicable to off-board storage of hydrogen for refueling infrastructure and the off-board regeneration of chemical hydrogen carriers applicable to hydrogen delivery.

218

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Spring 2009 Meeting Welcome  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation—given at the Spring 2009 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting—covers the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) mission and services; Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) Section 432 guidance; and American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA).

219

Catalyst Working Group Kick-off Meeting: Personal Commentary  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Personal commentary on future directions in fuel cell electrocatalysis, presented by Mark Debe, 3M, at the kick-off meeting of the U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Program's Catalysis Working Group, held May 14, 2012, in Arlington, Virginia.

220

BP and Hydrogen Pipelines DOE Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

BP and Hydrogen Pipelines DOE Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop August 30-31, 2005 Gary P · UK partnership opened the first hydrogen demonstration refueling station · Two hydrogen pipelines l · " i i l i 2 i i ll i i l pl ifi i · 8" ly idl i i l s Hydrogen Pipelines Two nes, on y a brand

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Summary of Muon Working Group B. Lee Roberts  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

BOSTON UNIVERSITY Summary of Muon Working Group Report on ¡ ¢ £ , EDM and ¤¦¥ B. Lee Roberts UNIVERSITY The Program of Muon Physics: § ¨© experiment to 0.05 ppm. § Muon EDM to cm. § Limit, Kyoto, September 2002 ­ p.3/25 #12;BOSTON UNIVERSITY Machine Requirements These experiments (except

Roberts, B. Lee

222

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Argonne DC Offices  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Argonne DC Offices L'Enfant Plaza and Kristin Deason Sentech, Inc. January 16, 2008 #12;SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Objectives This meeting was one of a continuing series of biannual meetings of the Hydrogen Storage Systems

223

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting Notes  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Meeting notes from the Fall 2011 Durability Working Group (DWG) Meeting sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Program. Notes also include a summary of progress on action items from the Spring 2011 DWG meeting.

224

4 MARCH 2002, GSA TODAY CD-ROM Working Group*  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

4 MARCH 2002, GSA TODAY CD-ROM Working Group* ABSTRACT An integration of new seismic reflec- tion, and to be the product of progressive evolu- tion of the lithosphere. INTRODUCTION The CD-ROM (Continental Dynamics tectonism. CD-ROM integrates a series of coordi- nated seismic experiments (Keller et al., 1999

Pazzaglia, Frank J.

225

Argonne Transportation - Chinese-American Joint Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Chinese-American Olympics Planning Group Meets at Argonne National Laboratory Chinese-American Olympics Planning Group Meets at Argonne National Laboratory Argonne's Transportation Technology R&D Center recently hosted approximately 90 Chinese and American scientists and policy makers working toward the goal of creating a cleaner Beijing. The December gathering was the first American meeting of the Chinese-American Joint Working Group on Olympic Cooperation to develop sustainable technologies for the City of Beijing and the 2008 Olympic Games. Two previous meetings had been held in China. "We have already cleaned emissions from factories and cars and are planting more trees for a cleaner environment," said Vice Mayor of Beijing, Fan Baoyuan. Chinese-American Olmpics Planning Group The Joint Work Group was created about two years ago by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), China's Ministry of Science and Technology, and Beijing Municipal Government. As part of its bid to host the 2008 Summer Games of the XXIX Olympiad, Beijing is committed to improving its environmental quality to create green Olympic Games.

226

NREL: News - NREL Assembles Industry Working Group to Advance Solar  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

713 713 NREL Assembles Industry Working Group to Advance Solar Securitization Webinar focusing on SAPC to be held on March 22 March 19, 2013 The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE)'s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) recently convened the Solar Access to Public Capital (SAPC) working group with a mission to enable securitization of solar PV assets and associated cash flows in the marketplace. SAPC's primary efforts center on the standardization of power purchase agreements, leases, and other documents relevant to residential and commercial deployment, and the development of robust datasets to assess performance and credit-default risk. These activities are designed to allow projects to be grouped into tradable securities. Securitization is expected to attract additional investors to the solar asset class, enabling the

227

May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group - Open Meeting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group Open Meeting Anne Crawley FEMP RE Team Lead. Kevin DeGroat Antares Group, Inc. Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov Agenda Courtesy: * Do Not Put Us On Hold! Hold Music is Lovely But Very Disruptive * Please Mute While Listening To Reduce Background Noise * Hold Questions Until End of Presentations Conference Call Number: 202-287-1063 2:30 to 2:40 Introductions and Welcome (Anne Crawley) 2:40 to 3:00 Large Scale RE Development on Public Lands (Boyan Kovacic) 3:00 to 3:20 NREL Tools and Analysis (Andy Walker) 3:20 to 3:30 Other Business/ Open Floor (Anne Crawley leading discussion) 3:30 Adjourn Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov * Welcome Boyan Kovacic of FEMP on developments and opportunities for large-scale RE development on public

228

May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group - Open Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group Open Meeting Anne Crawley FEMP RE Team Lead. Kevin DeGroat Antares Group, Inc. Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov Agenda Courtesy: * Do Not Put Us On Hold! Hold Music is Lovely But Very Disruptive * Please Mute While Listening To Reduce Background Noise * Hold Questions Until End of Presentations Conference Call Number: 202-287-1063 2:30 to 2:40 Introductions and Welcome (Anne Crawley) 2:40 to 3:00 Large Scale RE Development on Public Lands (Boyan Kovacic) 3:00 to 3:20 NREL Tools and Analysis (Andy Walker) 3:20 to 3:30 Other Business/ Open Floor (Anne Crawley leading discussion) 3:30 Adjourn Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov * Welcome Boyan Kovacic of FEMP on developments and opportunities for large-scale RE development on public

229

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) Conference Call  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Conference Conference Call Minutes, March 8, 2010 Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) Conference Call Minutes, March 8, 2010 Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group Charter - The steering committee discussed the draft charter. Two recommended changes were agreed upon: * A sentence will be added to identify that the steering committee will develop protocols to define specifics relative to certain work activities (such as peer reviews) * Agreed to add Steve Koonin, Undersecretary for Science for signature. Note: Sharon Steele is officially the NNSA representative to the steering committee. 2. Web Page - Jim O'Brien reviewed the website. In general, the steering committee agreed that with small changes the web site was ready to go "live."

230

July 10-11, 2012, HSS Focus Group Training Work Group - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Focus Group Training Working Group (TWG) Subcommittee Meeting Focus Group Training Working Group (TWG) Subcommittee Meeting July 10, 2012 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM 8:30 a.m. Meet Visitors at Gazebo Evan Dunne 8:00 a.m. Pre-meeting for Co-Chairs to discuss how Co-Chairs will operate together:  Roles and Responsibilities  Co-Chair Conference Calls  Working Group Calls  Meetings, etc. Pete Stafford, Julie Johnston, Karen Boardman 9:00 a.m. Co-Chairs meet with TWG Subcommittee (HAMMER, NTC, NIEHS)  Discuss Expectations of Subcommittee ALL 10:00 a.m. Review charter and discuss roles and responsibilities ALL 12:00 noon LUNCH 1:00 p.m. Review Recent Activities  OR Visit  NIEHS Trainer's Exchange  Sandia Learning Workshop, etc. ALL 2:00 p.m. Discuss potential projects/involvements

231

PROLIFERATION RESISTANCE AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION WORKING GROUP: METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

We summarize the technical progress and accomplishments on the evaluation methodology for proliferation resistance and physical protection (PR and PP) of Generation IV nuclear energy systems. We intend the results of the evaluations performed with the methodology for three types of users: system designers, program policy makers, and external stakeholders. The PR and PP Working Group developed the methodology through a series of demonstration and case studies. Over the past few years various national and international groups have applied the methodology to nuclear energy system designs as well as to developing approaches to advanced safeguards.

Bari R. A.; Whitlock, J.; Therios, I.U.; Peterson, P.F.

2012-11-14T23:59:59.000Z

232

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting Report: Fall 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 Meeting Report | Page 1 of 16 0 Meeting Report | Page 1 of 16 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting October 20-21, 2010 Rapid City, South Dakota Hosted by: Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. 136 individuals attended the meeting. Attendance Representation: * 20 Utility officials * 43 Federal agency representatives * 6 National Laboratory representatives * 67 Representatives from energy-related organizations (See Appendix 1 for a full list if participants and organizations at the end of this report.)

233

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Fall 2006 Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOVEMBER 1-2, 2006 NOVEMBER 1-2, 2006 SAN FRANCISCO, CA INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) held its Fall 2006 meeting in San Francisco, CA, on November 1-2. The meeting was hosted by Pacific Gas & Electric's (PG&E). A total of 80 individuals attended the meeting, including 28 new members. Organizations represented included 25 utility officials, 8 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) representatives, 22 Federal agency representatives, 6 National Laboratory representatives, and 18 representatives from energy-related organizations (see attached list of participants and corresponding organizations). The working group is a joint effort between FEMP and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in

234

EM QA Working Group September 2011 Meeting Materials  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

QUALITY ASSURANCE WORKING GROUP (VIDEO CONFERENCE) QUALITY ASSURANCE WORKING GROUP (VIDEO CONFERENCE) Meeting Location: Hanford, WA will be the Lead Site for this Meeting in Conjunction with the ISM Conference Room: Video Conference with Site Offices and Headquarters Offices Agenda for September 13, 2011 Time Topic Lead 12:00 - 12:30 pm (eastern) Potential Revision to the Performance Indicator and Measurement Approach for Goal #5 of the Journey to Excellence Regarding Quality Assurance Bob Murray (DOE-HQ) 12:30 - 1:00 pm (eastern) Discussion of major changes and challenges with revision to the Corporate Quality Assurance Program, EM-QA-001 Larry Perkins (DOE-HQ) 1:00 - 1:30 pm (eastern) Lessons Learned on Flow-down of Quality Requirements at

235

Hydrogen Storage Systems Anlaysis Working Group Meeting, December 12, 2006  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Argonne National Laboratory DC Offices 955 L'Enfant Plaza, North, SW, Suite 6000 Washington, DC December 12, 2006 SUMMARY REPORT Compiled by Romesh Kumar Argonne National Laboratory and Laura Verduzco Sentech, Inc. February 28, 2007 SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting December 12, 2006 955 L'Enfant Plaza, North, SW, Suite 6000, Washington, DC Meeting Objectives This meeting was one of a continuing series of biannual meetings of this Working Group. The objective of these meetings is to bring together the DOE research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information exchange and to update the researchers on related developments within the DOE program. A major thrust of

236

July 2012, 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. March 2012. 10 CFR 851 Workshop was held in conjunction with the 2012 Chemical Management Workshop. 2. Communication tools to enhance 10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program (WSHP) compliance updated: Requirements checklist distributed across DOE complex and on the 10 CFR 851 website; DOE Guide 440.1-1B to include technical clarifications. Near Term Goals/Activities: 1. Samples of acceptable WSHP programs (including ones based on ISM) will be posted on the 851 web site. 2. Teaming of HS-10, NTC, NIEHS, HAMMER to: Develop and/or identify applicable training materials and methods for the recent promulgated Hazard Communication standard, DOE wide approach for this training, and approach for

237

Renewable Energy Working Group - Summary Notes 5-2-2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Working Group Working Group Notes for the Open Webinar Meeting May 2, 2012 2:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Introductions and Welcome Anne Crawley welcomed all participants to the meeting. Large Scale RE Development on Public Lands Boyan Kovacic, FEMP, provided a presentation regarding large-scale renewable energy project development on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land. In this context, large-scale project size is considered to be approximately 10 megawatts (MW) and above. BLM has been implementing large- scale projects for the past three years. To indicate the scale, he noted that BLM manages 10% of U.S. land. He provided an overview of how much BLM land is suitable for solar, wind, and geothermal development. Mr. Kovacic outlined the Federal goals, BLM targets, and state renewable portfolio standard (RPS)

238

DOE Durability Working Group February 2013 Meeting Agenda  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Durability Working Group (DWG) DOE Durability Working Group (DWG) Meeting Agenda Thursday, February 28, 2013 Crystal City Marriott Crystal City, VA 8:30 am Welcome and introductory comments Debbie Myers (Argonne) and Rod Borup (Los Alamos) - co-chairs 8:45 am Introduction to meeting objectives Dimitrios Papageorgopoulos, Department of Energy, Fuel Cell Technologies Office Summary of what has been learned in DOE durability-related projects and durability R&D needs/gaps (PI's or project representatives; 10 min talks per person) 9:00 am Session I. Durability: Nuvera (Olga Polevaya), Ballard (Silvia Wessel), LANL (Rod Borup), and ANL (Debbie Myers) 9:40 am Session II. Modeling: LBNL (Adam Weber), ANL (Rajesh Ahluwalia) 10:00 am Session III. Catalyst and Impurities: 3M (Radoslav Atanasoski),

239

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG March 14, 2013 Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino Las Vegas, Nevada MEETING OVERVIEW The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Indian Energy (IE) hosted an Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group (ICEIWG) Meeting on Thursday, March 14, 2013 in Las Vegas, Nevada. IE solicited nominations for new members to ICEIWG-current, new and potential new members, as well as other tribal leaders and intertribal organization representatives were encouraged to attend. PARTICIPANTS ICEIWG Members Barney Enos, District 4 Councilman, Gila River Indian Community Jim Manion, General Manager of Warm Springs Power, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation William Micklin, CEO, Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians

240

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Spring 2007 Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEETING MEETING MAY 1-2, 2007 CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA HOSTED BY: FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) held its Spring 2007 meeting in Cape Canaveral, Florida on May 1-2. The meeting was hosted by Florida Power and Light (FPL) and was held at the Doubletree Oceanfront Cocoa Beach Hotel. A total of 86 individuals attended the meeting, including at least 11 new members. Organizations represented included 36 utility officials, 3 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) representatives, 19 Federal agency representatives, 5 National Laboratory representatives, and 24 representatives from energy-related organizations (see attached list of participants and corresponding organizations). The working group is a joint effort between FEMP and the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Report from the dosimetry working group to CEDR project management  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On August 2, 1989, Admiral Watkins, Secretary of the US Department of Energy (DOE), presented a four-point program designed to enhance the DOE epidemiology program. One part of this program was the establishment of a Comprehensive Epidemiologic Data Resource (CEDR) to facilitate independent research to validate and supplement DOE research on human health effects. A Dosimetry Working Group was formed during May 1991 to evaluate radiation dose variables and associated documentation that would be most useful to researchers for retrospective and prospective studies. The Working Group consisted of thirteen individuals with expertise and experience in health physics, epidemiology, dosimetry, computing, and industrial hygiene. A final report was delivered to CEDR Project Management during February 1992. The report contains a number of major recommendations concerning collection, interpretation, and documentation of dosimetry data to maximize their usefulness to researchers using CEDR for examining possible health effects of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation.

Fix, J J

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Renewable Energy Working Group - Summary Notes 5-2-2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Working Group Working Group Notes for the Open Webinar Meeting May 2, 2012 2:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Introductions and Welcome Anne Crawley welcomed all participants to the meeting. Large Scale RE Development on Public Lands Boyan Kovacic, FEMP, provided a presentation regarding large-scale renewable energy project development on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land. In this context, large-scale project size is considered to be approximately 10 megawatts (MW) and above. BLM has been implementing large- scale projects for the past three years. To indicate the scale, he noted that BLM manages 10% of U.S. land. He provided an overview of how much BLM land is suitable for solar, wind, and geothermal development. Mr. Kovacic outlined the Federal goals, BLM targets, and state renewable portfolio standard (RPS)

243

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RAWG) Conference Call Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) Conference Call Minutes May 6, 2010 PARTICIPANTS Members: Don Nichols (CDNS), Jim O'Brien (HSS), Carol Sohn (SC), Rich Stark (NE), Bill Weaver (EM for Steve Krahn), Todd Lapointe (CNS for Chip Lagdon) Others: Kamiar Jamali (NE), Andy Wallo (DNFSB 2009-1 Responsible Manager), Rama Sastry (HSS), Samuel Rosenbloom (HSS) SUMMARY 1. Risk Assessment Information Notice (IN): HSS provided the draft IN to safety basis experts from SNL, Y-12 and PNNL for their review and comment. Their comments were addressed and the IN is back into concurrence. 2. DNFSB Brief: HSS is coordinated with the RWG and DNFSB to schedule a DNFSB brief in June. 3. Risk Assessment Training: The National Training Center is presenting its risk assessment overview

244

Chair, CTBT working group B Radionuclide Expert Group and the U.S.  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Chair, CTBT working group B Radionuclide Expert Group and the U.S. Chair, CTBT working group B Radionuclide Expert Group and the U.S. Radionuclide Subgroup of the Verification Monitoring Task Force, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > Ted Bowyer

245

Summary of “Future of DIS” Working Group Session  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Despite the closure of the HERA accelerator in the past few years, much physics still remains to be understood, from the quark and gluon content of the nucleon/nucleus across all x to the still unknown spin structure of the proton. The 'Future of DIS' working group was dedicated to discussions on these and many other subjects. This paper represents a brief overview of the discussions. For further details, please refer to individual contributions.

Lamont M.; Guzey, V.; Polini, A.

2011-04-11T23:59:59.000Z

246

Report of the Quark Flavor Physics Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This report represents the response of the Intensity Frontier Quark Flavor Physics Working Group to the Snowmass charge. We summarize the current status of quark flavor physics and identify many exciting future opportunities for studying the properties of strange, charm, and bottom quarks. The ability of these studies to reveal the effects of new physics at high mass scales make them an essential ingredient in a well-balanced experimental particle physics program.

Butler, J N; Ritchie, J L; Cirigliano, V; Kettell, S; Briere, R; Petrov, A A; Schwartz, A; Skwarnicki, T; Zupan, J; Christ, N; Sharpe, S R; Van de Water, R S; Altmannshofer, W; Arkani-Hamed, N; Artuso, M; Asner, D M; Bernard, C; Bevan, A J; Blanke, M; Bonvicini, G; Browder, T E; Bryman, D A; Campana, P; Cenci, R; Cline, D; Comfort, J; Cronin-Hennessy, D; Datta, A; Dobbs, S; Duraisamy, M; El-Khadra, A X; Fast, J E; Forty, R; Flood, K T; Gershon, T; Grossman, Y; Hamilton, B; Hill, C T; Hill, R J; Hitlin, D G; Jaffe, D E; Jawahery, A; Jessop, C P; Kagan, A L; Kaplan, D M; Kohl, M; Krizan, P; Kronfeld, A S; Lee, K; Littenberg, L S; MacFarlane, D B; Mackenzie, P B; Meadows, B T; Olsen, J; Papucci, M; Parsa, Z; Paz, G; Perez, G; Piilonen, L E; Pitts, K; Purohit, M V; Quinn, B; Ratcliff, B N; Roberts, D A; Rosner, J L; Rubin, P; Seeman, J; Seth, K K; Schmidt, B; Schopper, A; Sokoloff, M D; Soni, A; Stenson, K; Stone, S; Sundrum, R; Tschirhart, R; Vainshtein, A; Wah, Y W; Wilkinson, G; Wise, M B; Worcester, E; Xu, J; Yamanaka, T

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

247

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Transport Modeling Working Group Transport Modeling Working Group The Transport Modeling Working Group meets twice per year to exchange information, create synergies, share experimental and computational results, and collaboratively develop methodologies for and understanding of transport phenomena in polymer electrolyte fuel cell stacks. Its members include principle investigators and supporting personnel from transport-related projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Learn more about DOE research activities can be found in the Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan. Description Technical Targets Meetings Contacts Description Fuel cell operation relies on effective mass transport of species through individual components and across the interfaces between components. Among these species are hydrogen, oxygen, water, protons, and electrons. Transport behavior is a function of operating conditions and component properties such as microstructure and surface properties. Understanding and optimizing the controlling transport phenomena are critical to the efficient and cost-effective operation of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. A better understanding of mass transport in the fuel cell, especially of water, has the potential to lead to improved designs and more efficient systems.

248

September 8, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom - Meeting Overview and Action Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09-12-11 Draft 09-12-11 Draft DRAFT Meeting Overview and Action Summary HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom September 8, 2011 Meeting Overview: Glenn Podonsky reflected on the HSS Focus Group's 5 year history and reported that 24 HSS/Union Focus group meetings have been held to date. He emphasized the value of the relationships that have been developed between HSS and the unions and the need to re-energize efforts and rally to move the ball forward in addressing worker health and safety concerns through the 5 Work Groups. He acknowledged the vital importance of worker health and safety training quality, portability and standardization, and the progress made over the past several

249

Proposed Work Scope for the Rail Topic Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Proposed Task Plan for TEC Rail Topic Group Status: Active DOE Leads: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM), Office of National Transportation, Jay Jones and Alex Thrower Start Date: September 22, 2005 Purpose: The purpose of the Transportation External Coordinating (TEC) Working Group's Rail Topic Group (RTG) is to provide stakeholder perspectives and feedback to the Office of National Transportation (ONT) in the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) regarding topics of common interest concerning operating practices, logistical constraints, and other rail- related issues affecting the development and deployment of a safe, secure, and efficient system for transporting spent fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) to a

250

September 13, 2012, HSS Focus Group Training Work Group - Meeting Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Subject: Meeting Minutes for Training Working Group Meeting Conducted September 13, 2012 In conjunction with the HAMMER Steering Committee meeting the HSS Focus Group Training Working Group Meeting was conducted from 2:00 PM to 4:30 PM at the HAMMER Training Facility in Richland, WA. The meeting was attended by 33 personnel representing HSS, NTC, NIEHS, CPWR, various labor organizations, and DOE contractors. Additional personnel participated in the meeting via the established conference call. A copy of the personnel physically attending is attached for information. Meeting summary: Julie Goeckner, DOE/EM-40 provided the background and overview of the existing DOE Senior Executive Safety Conscious Work Environment course which was developed to address the

251

Summary Report of Working Group 6: Laser-Plasma Acceleration  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A summary is given of presentations and discussions in theLaser-Plasma Acceleration Working Group at the 2006 Advanced AcceleratorConcepts Workshop. Presentation highlights include: widespreadobservation of quasi-monoenergetic electrons; good agreement betweenmeasured and simulated beam properties; the first demonstration oflaser-plasma acceleration up to 1 GeV; single-shot visualization of laserwakefield structure; new methods for measuring<100 fs electronbunches; and new methods for "machining" laser-plasma acceleratorstructures. Discussion of future direction includes: developing a roadmapfor laser-plasma acceleration beyond 1 GeV; a debate over injection andguiding; benchmarking simulations with improved wake diagnostics;petawatt laser technology for future laser-plasmaaccelerators.

Leemans, Wim P.; Downer, Michael; Siders, Craig

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

252

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Spring 2011 Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PAGE 1 OF 18 PAGE 1 OF 18 FEDERAL UTILITY PARTNERSHIP WORKING GROUP (FUPWG) SPRING 2011 MEETING REPORT PORTLAND, OR WELCOME - MIKE WEEDALL, BPA (MJWEEDALL@BPA.GOV) * Bonneville Power serves 130+ distribution companies, or 85% of the transmission in the region in the Pacific Northwest * BPA encourages energy efficiency improvements with their customers * Agencies assisted: Army, Navy, GSA, Forest Service, National Parks o Projects completed: lighting, HVAC, controls, specific processes, building shell * Working to build sustainability plans to achieve carbon reduction goals * Efficiency has proven to be less expensive than other resources available - energy efficiency is BPA's third largest resource (viewed seriously by BPA) DAVID MCANDREW, DOE FEMP (DAVID.MCANDREW@EE.DOE.GOV)

253

U.S.-India Coal Working Group Terms of Reference | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S.-India Coal Working Group Terms of Reference U.S.-India Coal Working Group Terms of Reference U.S.-India Coal Working Group Terms of Reference More Documents & Publications...

254

September 2012, HSS Focus Group Strategic Initiatives Work Group - Status Overviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strategic Initiatives Work Group Status Overview Strategic Initiatives Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. June 26. Telecom with USW - Informative near-miss occurrence reporting. 2. June 29. HS-24 finalized and released the Injury and Illness Dashboard. 3. July 30. Meeting held to reconfirm the priorities of and a path forward for the HSS Union Strategic Initiatives WG. - Discussed worker safety and reporting issues and confirmed that reporting and recording would be the near-term focus of the group. - The recent release of the Injury and Illness Dashboard as a tool for easily exploring DOE occupational safety and health injury and illness information was also highlighted. 4. Aug 29 - 31. HSS Analysis Lead (Steve Domotor) attended USW's DOE Worker

255

May 19, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Meeting - Draft Work Group Matrix  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

06-22-11) 06-22-11) WORK GROUPS HSS/ Union/ Stakeholder Leads Work Group Participants Improvement Issues/Goals Initial/Current Tasks Outputs 10 CFR 851 Pat Worthington CPWR USW Collectively work to ensure implementation of health and safety programs (851 Rule) within and among DOE site contractors to eliminate/minimize inconsistent requirements among M&I, M&O, LLC and SBA contractors/subcontractors. - Identify leads and participants - Develop charter - Goals/ Intended Output - Develop Task Activities - HS-1 engage DOE Corporate Implementation Bill McArthur Ensure uniformity and health and safety plans are in place and flow down among all contractors/subcontractors through oversight, communications, awareness, education and enforcement TBD

256

Final report of the accident phenomenology and consequence (APAC) methodology evaluation. Spills Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Spills Working Group was one of six working groups established under the Accident Phenomenology and Consequence (APAC) methodology evaluation program. The objectives of APAC were to assess methodologies available in the accident phenomenology and consequence analysis area and to evaluate their adequacy for use in preparing DOE facility safety basis documentation, such as Basis for Interim Operation (BIO), Justification for Continued Operation (JCO), Hazard Analysis Documents, and Safety Analysis Reports (SARs). Additional objectives of APAC were to identify development needs and to define standard practices to be followed in the analyses supporting facility safety basis documentation. The Spills Working Group focused on methodologies for estimating four types of spill source terms: liquid chemical spills and evaporation, pressurized liquid/gas releases, solid spills and resuspension/sublimation, and resuspension of particulate matter from liquid spills.

Brereton, S.; Shinn, J. [Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States); Hesse, D [Battelle Columbus Labs., OH (United States); Kaninich, D. [Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC (United States); Lazaro, M. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States); Mubayi, V. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

257

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Section 180(c) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Section 180(c) Section 180(c) TEC Working Group Topic Groups Section 180(c) Section 180(c) is a provision in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act that requires DOE to implement a program of technical and financial assistance to states for training public safety officials of appropriate units of local government and to Indian tribes through whose jurisdictions the Department plans to transport spent nuclear fuel or high-level waste to a facility authorized under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. The training would cover both safe routine transportation and emergency response procedures. The Section 180(c) Topic Group was established to identify and address issues related to the design and implementation of the Section 180(c) grant program. The group focused on several issues, the most prominent of which

258

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting October 10, 2010 Agenda 6 pm Welcome and introductory comments Debbie Myers (Argonne) and Rod Borup (Los Alamos) - co-chairs 6:15 pm Overview of electrocatalyst and support degradation mechanisms Sarah Ball, Johnson Matthey Fuel Cells 6:45 pm Discussion/presentations by project PIs/representatives (5-10 minutes each) * Overview of electrocatalyst and support degradation aspects of projects * Protocols/testing procedures/diagnostics used to resolve the electrocatalyst and support degradation mechanisms * Ballard, Nuvera, LANL-Borup, Argonne, DuPont, UTC Power, LANL-Mukund, NREL, HNEI, 3M 8:15 pm Discussion on relevance and impact of degradation studies of each stack component Led by Rod Borup Discussion on standardized generic start-up and shut-down protocols

259

Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop: Code for Hydrogen Pipelines  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Code for Hydrogen Code for Hydrogen Pipelines Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop Augusta, Georgia August 31, 2005 Louis Hayden, PE Chair ASME B31.12 3 Presentation Outline * Approval for new code development * Charge from BPTCS to B31 Standards Committee for Hydrogen Piping/Pipeline code development * B31.12 Status & Structure * Hydrogen Pipeline issues * Research Needs * Where Do We Go From Here? 4 Code for Hydrogen Piping and Pipelines * B31 Hydrogen Section Committee to develop a new code for H 2 piping and pipelines - Include requirements specific to H 2 service for power, process, transportation, distribution, commercial, and residential applications - Balance reference and incorporation of applicable sections of B31.1, B31.3 and B31.8 - Have separate parts for industrial, commercial/residential

260

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Spring 2009 Meeting Welcome  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Biloxi, Ms Biloxi, Ms Beau Rivage Resort, Hotel and Casino Thank You Mississippi Power Thank You Joe Bosco Don't forget the suntan lotion 1 Washington Update Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Biloxi, Mississippi David McAndrew Federal Energy Management Program May 5, 2009 Be Present and Participate Please turn off cell phones and blackberries We will have lots of breaks for you If you really need to take a call or use your blackberry please step outside Also remember the FUPWG code of Conduct Oh Yea, try and have a little fun! 3 FUPWG Ground Rules 4 * Changes to FEMP Organization, Structure, & Services * FEMP EISA Section 432 Guidance * ARRA Update * Update on Utility Sector EERE Spending Outline Facilitate the Federal Government's implementation of sound, cost-effective energy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Working Group Reports A Short-Wave Radiometer Array Across  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 Working Group Reports A Short-Wave Radiometer Array Across the Tropical Pacific Ocean as a Component of the TOGA-TAO Buoy Array R. M. Reynolds Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York Introduction The purpose of this document is to bring together pertinent information concerning the NOAA TOGA-TAO buoy array so that a decision can be made for the following questions: 1. Are the scientific gains from an array of short-wave radiation sensors in the equatorial Pacific Ocean sufficiently impelling that DOE/ARM should provide financial and material support to NOAA/PMEL to install and operate this array? 2. What scientists and/or scientific studies would directly benefit from such a data set? 3. What should that array look like? That is, what sub-set of buoys should be so implemented given the per-buoy

262

DOE Durability Working Group May 2012 Meeting Agenda  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Durability Working Group (DWG) Monday, May 14, 2012, 8:00-10:00 am Gateway Salon I, Crystal Gateway Marriott Crystal City, VA Meeting Agenda 8:00 am Welcome and introductory comments Debbie Myers (Argonne) and Rod Borup (Los Alamos) - co-chairs 8:05 am New Durability Test protocols proposed by FCCJ Atsushi OHMA, Manager, Advanced Materials Laboratory, Nissan Research Center, Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. 8:40 am Metal Bipolar Plate Degradation Mechanisms and AST Development Rod Borup, Rangachary Mukundan, LANL 9:00 am DWG Durability Protocols - results and finalizing Debbie Myers - contributions from others 9:20 am Report on progress on action items from Fall, 2011 DWG meeting Rod Borup and Debbie Myers 9:40 am Wrap-up, discussion of "output" from DWG, discussion of result and model

263

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG)Conference Call  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 6, 2010 May 6, 2010 Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG)Conference Call Minutes, May 6, 2010 Risk Assessment Information Notice (IN): HSS provided the draft IN to safety basis experts from SNL, Y-12 and PNNL for their review and comment. Their comments were addressed and the IN is back into concurrence. 2. DNFSB Brief: HSS is coordinated with the RWG and DNFSB to schedule a DNFSB brief in June. 3. Risk Assessment Training: The National Training Center is presenting its risk assessment overview course May 18-20 at DOE headquarters. HS-20 is planning to discuss DOE's nuclear safety risk assessment study and plans for policy and guidance development at the end of the course. 4. External Risk Study: Data collection has been completed at NASA, NEI, NASA, and FDA. HS-20

264

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group - Utility Interconnection Panel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WORKING GROUP - Utility Interconnection Panel M. Renee Jewell, Program/Energy Manager, & Contracting Officer, Forest Service (reneejewell@fs.fed.us) SCENARIO: Fed Agencies had Solar PV Projects To Connect with Utility in California * United States (US) Forest Service (FS) - 1 small Solar Photovoltaic (PV) project; and - 1 small Renewable project (Solar PV) exporting energy to grid. * U.S. National Park Service (NPS) - 24 Small Solar Photovoltaic projects. * U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs (VA) - 6 Renewable generation projects of different sizes. FS Region 5 (California) - Solar Photovoltaic Installations Solar PV Project @ Mono Lake Visitor Center (Inyo NF) Solar PV Project (net exporter) @ San Dimas Technology and Development Center SITUATION - Utility Wanted Feds to Sign Its

265

Working Group Reports Unmanned Aerospace Vehicle Workshop J. Vitko, Jr.  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Working Group Reports Unmanned Aerospace Vehicle Workshop J. Vitko, Jr. Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, California The Unmanned Aerospace Vehicle (UAV) Workshop concentrated on reviewing and refining the science experiments planned for the UAV Demonstration Flights (UDF) scheduled at the Oklahoma Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART) in April 1994. These experiments are summarized below. UDF Experiments 1. Clear sky, daylight Scientific questions: Do models and observations agree? Under varying conditions (low/high humidity, low/high aerosols)? How accurately can we measure fluxes? What is the impact of surface "patchiness" in the visible? In the IR? At what length scales does it average out? Flight profiles: Minimum of 2 hrs centered on solar noon, clear sky, three altitude tiers, 10- to 20-km legs;

266

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 21, 2012 NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA Wyndham Garden Hotel-Baronne Plaza 201 Baronne Street New Orleans, LA 70112 (504) 522-0083 AGENDA MEETING ROOM - MAGNOLIA ROOM WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2012 4:30pm - 6:30pm INTERNAL WORKING GROUP SESSION FOR ICEIWG MEMBERS ICEIWG Members and Alternates ï‚· Rodney Bordeaux, Chairman, Rosebud Sioux Tribe ï‚· Barney Enos, Jr., District 4 Community Council, Gila River Indian Community ï‚· Jim Manion, Warm Springs Power, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon ï‚· Will Micklin, CEO, Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians ï‚· Mato Standing High, Attorney General, Rosebud Sioux Tribe ï‚· Ronald Suppah, Vice Chairman Tribal Council, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon

267

Summary of the Working Group on Spin Physics  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A summary is given of the experimental and theoretical results presented in the working group on spin physics. New data on inclusive and semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering, combined with theoretical studies of the polarized distribution functions of nucleons, were presented. Many talks addressed the relatively new subjects of transversity distributions and generalized parton distributions. These distributions can be studied by measuring single spin asymmetries, while partonic intrinsic motion and models of new spin dependent distribution and fragmentation functions are needed to obtain the corresponding theoretical description. These subjects are not only studied in deep-inelastic lepton scattering, but also in polarized proton-proton collisions at RHIC. A selection of results that have been obtained in these experiments together with several associated theoretical ideas are presented in this paper. In conclusion, a brief sketch is given of the prospects for experimental and theoretical studies of the spin structure of the nucleon in the coming years.

Mauro Anselmino; Gerard van der Steenhoven

2003-09-11T23:59:59.000Z

268

Working Group Report: Computing for the Intensity Frontier  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is the report of the Computing Frontier working group on Lattice Field Theory prepared for the proceedings of the 2013 Community Summer Study ("Snowmass"). We present the future computing needs and plans of the U.S. lattice gauge theory community and argue that continued support of the U.S. (and worldwide) lattice-QCD effort is essential to fully capitalize on the enormous investment in the high-energy physics experimental program. We first summarize the dramatic progress of numerical lattice-QCD simulations in the past decade, with some emphasis on calculations carried out under the auspices of the U.S. Lattice-QCD Collaboration, and describe a broad program of lattice-QCD calculations that will be relevant for future experiments at the intensity and energy frontiers. We then present details of the computational hardware and software resources needed to undertake these calculations.

Rebel, B.; Sanchez, M.C.; Wolbers, S.

2013-10-25T23:59:59.000Z

269

DOE Durability Working Group May 2011 Meeting Agenda  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Durability Working Group Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 7:00-10:00 pm Marriott Crystal Gateway "Salon V" (Ballroom Level) Meeting Agenda 7:00 pm Welcome and introductory comments Debbie Myers (Argonne) and Rod Borup (Los Alamos) - co-chairs 7:10 pm Compilation of decay mechanisms, impact, evidence, and diagnostic procedures Proposed by: Adam Weber (LBNL), Mike Perry (UTRC) Assigned to: Debbie Myers, Rod Borup, Rangachary Mukundan (LANL) 7:30 pm PEFC start-up protocol Assigned to: Greg James (Ballard) - lead, Rod Borup (LANL), Mike Perry (UTRC) 7:50 pm Accelerated stress test for non-carbon supports (e.g., metal oxides) Proposed by: Shyam Kocha (NREL), Assigned to: Shyam Kocha (NREL) - lead Mahlon Wilson and Eric Brosha (LANL) 8:10 pm Discussion of electrochemical equivalent of accelerated stress test for MEAs

270

September 13, 2012, HSS Focus Group Training Working Group (TWG) Meeting - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 08/29/12 3 08/29/12 HSS Focus Group Training Working Group (TWG) Meeting September 13, 2012 Room 67 HAMMER 2:00 PM - 4:30 PM Time Topic Lead 2:00 p.m.  Safety Minute  Welcome and Introductions  Review of planned agenda Chairs - Pete Stafford, Julie Johnston, Karen Boardman 2:20 PM Approval of July Meeting minutes Julie Johnston 2:25 PM Report on Status of Initiatives * Rad-Worker Reciprocity Process Evan Dunne * Next Course for Pilot - Hazwoper Ted Outwater * Idaho Training Committee Evan Dunne * Work with BMAC Evan Dunne * HAZCOM GHS Gap Training Ted Giltz * GERT Training Ted Giltz 3:10 PM Safety Culture Discussion Karen Boardman, Ted Giltz 3:20 PM Actions from last meeting update * Draft letter endorsing reciprocity effort Pete Turcic

271

Minutes of the October 2008 Meeting of the High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Meeting minutes of the High Temperature Membrane Working Group from October 16, 2008, in Honolulu, Hawaii.

272

R&D Plan for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Summary of challenges, approaches and technical targets for HFCIT's High Temperature Membrane Working Group.

273

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

establishes partnerships and facilitates communications among Federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. The group develops strategies to implement...

274

May 21, 2012, Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Strategic Initiatives Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strategic Initiatives Work Group Charter Strategic Initiatives Work Group Charter In an ongoing effort to further the improvement of health, safety, environmental, and security performance within the Department's contractor work force, DOE is engaged in the establishment of work groups to pursue health and safety improvements across the DOE Complex. These efforts support DOE's responsibility as owner/manager to protect its greatest asset: the worker. The work group supports DOE's integrated safety management system and further DOE's best interests by fostering worker involvement and partnerships to maximize continuity of operations and the success of the Department's national security mission.

275

Group Work Support for the BlueJ IDE Kasper Fisker  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

@deakin.edu.au ABSTRACT Learning to work in teams is essential for every software professional. Developing softwareGroup Work Support for the BlueJ IDE Kasper Fisker fisker@fiskers.org Michael Kölling Computing. Starting effective group work practices early can lead to better acceptance of group work as a standard

Kent, University of

276

April 30, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting to address training - Executive Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HSS/UNION MEETING TO ADDRESS TRAINING HSS/UNION MEETING TO ADDRESS TRAINING INTEGRATED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND FINAL ACTION LIST HSS and the labor unions who participated in the initial 2007 HSS Focus Group meetings agreed to a path forward in which various unions combined to form core working groups to address union identified issues by topical area. The following is a synthesis of actions/activities identified in the April 30 HSS/Union meeting to address training issues with focus in the areas of the development of DOE-wide HAMMER modeled training, standardization of training requirements and implementation, as well as, broader based worker safety training DOE-wide. 1. Define minimum training standards/requirements (851 as a guiding basis) [HSS] - Baseline training requirements [NIEHS/HS-10, NTC, HS-20]

277
278

Storage Systems Analysis Working Group | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

to achieve common objectives. The systems under consideration include physical storage (tankscryogenic storage), metal hydrides, chemical hydrides, and high-surface-area...

279

Report on the 1ST Meeting of the Joint Working Group on  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FINAL FINAL Report on the 2 nd Meeting of the Joint Working Group on Safety for the U.S.-PRC Coordinating Committee of Fusion Energy (U.S.-PRC Safety Monitoring Program) Meeting in USA, November 4-17, 2010 A. PURPOSE The purpose of the 2nd meeting of the U.S.-China Joint Working Group on Safety was to informally evaluate the programmatic aspects of environmental, health and safety (ESH) programs in US fusion research facilities by touring laboratory areas and meeting with researchers and safety professionals. Based on these interactions, the U.S.-China delegation was able to share information and provide suggestions in an effort to reduce the likelihood of bodily injury and/or property damage. In addition, good approaches and practices developed at

280

Minimal Acceptable Work Area Safety Standards for the repair ...  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

POLICY X.X.X. Volume V, Information Technology. Chapter 6, Acceptable Safety Work Locations. Issuing Office: Department of Mathematics. Responsible ...

2005-04-19T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Report of the Solar and Atmospheric Neutrino Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The highest priority of the Solar and Atmospheric Neutrino Experiment Working Group is the development of a real-time, precision experiment that measures the pp solar neutrino flux. A measurement of the pp solar neutrino flux, in comparison with the existing precision measurements of the high energy {sup 8}B neutrino flux, will demonstrate the transition between vacuum and matter-dominated oscillations, thereby quantitatively testing a fundamental prediction of the standard scenario of neutrino flavor transformation. The initial solar neutrino beam is pure {nu}{sub e}, which also permits sensitive tests for sterile neutrinos. The pp experiment will also permit a significantly improved determination of {theta}{sub 12} and, together with other solar neutrino measurements, either a measurement of {theta}{sub 13} or a constraint a factor of two lower than existing bounds. In combination with the essential pre-requisite experiments that will measure the {sup 7}Be solar neutrino flux with a precision of 5%, a measurement of the pp solar neutrino flux will constitute a sensitive test for non-standard energy generation mechanisms within the Sun. The Standard Solar Model predicts that the pp and {sup 7}Be neutrinos together constitute more than 98% of the solar neutrino flux. The comparison of the solar luminosity measured via neutrinos to that measured via photons will test for any unknown energy generation mechanisms within the nearest star. A precise measurement of the pp neutrino flux (predicted to be 92% of the total flux) will also test stringently the theory of stellar evolution since the Standard Solar Model predicts the pp flux with a theoretical uncertainty of 1%. We also find that an atmospheric neutrino experiment capable of resolving the mass hierarchy is a high priority. Atmospheric neutrino experiments may be the only alternative to very long baseline accelerator experiments as a way of resolving this fundamental question. Such an experiment could be a very large scale water Cerenkov detector, or a magnetized detector with flavor and antiflavor sensitivity. Additional priorities are nuclear physics measurements which will reduce the uncertainties in the predictions of the Standard Solar Model, and similar supporting measurements for atmospheric neutrinos (cosmic ray fluxes, magnetic fields, etc.). We note as well that the detectors for both solar and atmospheric neutrino measurements can serve as multipurpose detectors, with capabilities of discovering dark matter, relic supernova neutrinos, proton decay, or as targets for long baseline accelerator neutrino experiments.

Back, H.; Bahcall, J.N.; Bernabeu, J.; Boulay, M.G.; Bowles, T.; Calaprice, F.; Champagne, A.; Freedman, S.; Gai, M.; Galbiati, C.; Gallagher, H.; Gonzalez-Garcia, C.; Hahn, R.L.; Heeger, K.M.; Hime, A.; Jung, C.K.; Klein, J.R.; Koike, M.; Lanou, R.; Learned, J.G.; Lesko, K.T.; Losecco, J.; Maltoni, M.; Mann, A.; McKinsey, D.; Palomares-Ruiz, S.; Pena-Garay, C.; Petcov, S.T.; Piepke, A.; Pitt, M.; Raghavan, R.; Robertson, R.G.H.; Scholberg, K.; Sobel, H.W.; Takeuchi, T.; Vogelaar, R.; Wolfenstein, L.

2004-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

282

Examining Group Work: Implications for the Digital Library as Sharium  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Digital libraries have the potential to be rich interactive ... the need for a complex system that intertwines public and private work space. Currently DLs provide only one tool –...

Sandra Toze; Elaine G. Toms

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

North American Energy Work Group Releases Updated Trilateral...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

efficiency, regulatory cooperation, and hydrocarbons. The SPP strengthens North America's energy markets by working together, according to our respective legal frameworks, to...

284

Summary for Policymakers IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group III  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

this introduction: • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission trends •2. Global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have grown sinceincrease in atmospheric GHG concentrations [1.3; Working

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

AEO2014 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

competitiveness. Page 8 of 9 22) What is the distance of the Great Bear tight oil well test area from TAPS? EIA response: One well is off the Dalton highway, the play ranges up to...

286

The QCD/SM working group: Summary report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD), and more generally the physics of the Standard Model (SM), enter in many ways in high energy processes at TeV Colliders, and especially in hadron colliders (the Tevatron at Fermilab and the forthcoming LHC at CERN), First of all, at hadron colliders, QCD controls the parton luminosity, which rules the production rates of any particle or system with large invariant mass and/or large transverse momentum. Accurate predictions for any signal of possible ''New Physics'' sought at hadron colliders, as well as the corresponding backgrounds, require an improvement in the control of uncertainties on the determination of PDF and of the propagation of these uncertainties in the predictions. Furthermore, to fully exploit these new types of PDF with uncertainties, uniform tools (computer interfaces, standardization of the PDF evolution codes used by the various groups fitting PDF's) need to be proposed and developed. The dynamics of colour also affects, both in normalization and shape, various observables of the signals of any possible ''New Physics'' sought at the TeV scale, such as, e.g. the production rate, or the distributions in transverse momentum of the Higgs boson. Last, but not least, QCD governs many backgrounds to the searches for this ''New Physics''. Large and important QCD corrections may come from extra hard parton emission (and the corresponding virtual corrections), involving multi-leg and/or multi-loop amplitudes. This requires complex higher order calculations, and new methods have to be designed to compute the required multi-legs and/or multi-loop corrections in a tractable form. In the case of semi-inclusive observables, logarithmically enhanced contributions coming from multiple soft and collinear gluon emission require sophisticated QCD resummation techniques. Resummation is a catch-all name for efforts to extend the predictive power of QCD by summing the large logarithmic corrections to all orders in perturbation theory. In practice, the resummation formalism depends on the observable at issue, through the type of logarithm to be resummed, and the resummation methods. In parallel with this perturbative QCD-oriented working programme, the implementation of both QCD/SM and New physics in Monte Carlo event generators is confronted with a number of issues which deserve uniformization or improvements. The important issues are: (1) the problem of interfacing partonic event generators to showering Monte-Carlos; (2) an implementation using this interface to calculate backgrounds which are poorly simulated by the showering Monte-Carlos alone; (3) a comparison of the HERWIG and PYTHIA parton shower models with the predictions of soft gluon resummation; (4) studies of the underlying events at hadron colliders to check how well they are modeled by the Monte-Carlo generators.

W. Giele et al.

2004-01-12T23:59:59.000Z

287

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting: Summary...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

projects and work being presented. Romesh Kumar (ANL) presented the agenda, led the self- identification of those present in the room and the participants who were calling in, and...

288

IAU DIVISION X, XII / COMMISSION 40, 41 / WORKING GROUP on HISTORICAL RADIO ASTRONOMY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

IAU DIVISION X, XII / COMMISSION 40, 41 / WORKING GROUP on HISTORICAL RADIO ASTRONOMY CHAIR Kenneth. Introduction The IAU Working Group on Historical Radio Astronomy (WGHRA) was formed at the 2003 General Assembly of the IAU as a Joint Working Group of Commissions 40 (Radio Astronomy) and 41 (History

Groppi, Christopher

289

2012 Bioenergy Action Plan Prepared by the Bioenergy Interagency Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2012 Bioenergy Action Plan Prepared by the Bioenergy Interagency Working Group AUGUST 2012 Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor #12;Bioenergy Interagency Working Group Julia Levin, Chair, Bioenergy Interagency and the California Energy Commission with input from the Bioenergy Interagency Working Group. This report

290

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Held in Conjunction with the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Held in Conjunction with the DOE Hydrogen REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting June 11, 2008 Crystal Gateway Marriott of the Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group (SSAWG). The objective of these meetings is to bring

291

LANL technical progress update for US HJPRR working group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The outline of this presentation is: (1) Collaboration on Master Alloy Melting; (2) Data for Safety Analysis, (3) HIP can development status, (4) Bond strength quality, (5) Plasma spraying results, and (6) Bare Rolling Larger Rolling Ingots. Significant near term progress has been made in five areas: (1) Collaboration on Master Alloy Melting; (2) HIP can development status; (3) Bond strength quality; (4) Plasma spraying results; and (5) Bare Rolling Larger Rolling Ingots. Significant progress is expected in the next month on several important areas: (1) Intrinsic bond strength of plasma sprayed Zr (2) Advanced Cleaning; (3) Residual Stress Collaboration with INL; and (4) Cost Metric Assessment.

Dombrowski, David E [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2011-01-06T23:59:59.000Z

292

November 13 - 15, 2012 HSS Work Group Leadership Meeting Summary - Strategic Initiatives  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strategic Initiatives Work Group Strategic Initiatives Work Group Co-Lead Telecom November 13, 2012 DRAFT Discussion Overview Purpose: This HSS Focus Group Work Group telecom was held with the Work Group Co-Leads to discuss change elements and strategic direction to support accelerated efforts to advancing progress, productivity and performance within each of the Work Groups. Although current roles within all of the Work Groups and Focus Group efforts remain the same, the addition of centralized leadership and oversight by representatives (2) of the Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board are established. 1. Leadership Transition * Co-Leads will continue to provide technical functions * Functions of the Focus Group Program will remain the same. [Lily/Stephanie]

293

November 13 - 15, 2012 HSS Work Group Leadership Meeting Summary - 851 Implementation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

851 Implementation Work Group 851 Implementation Work Group Co-Lead Telecom November 13, 2012 DRAFT Discussion Overview Purpose: This HSS Focus Group Work Group telecom was held with the Work Group Co-Leads to discuss change elements and strategic direction to support accelerated efforts to advancing progress, productivity and performance within each of the Work Groups. Although current roles within all of the Work Groups and Focus Group efforts remain the same, the addition of centralized leadership and oversight by representatives (2) of the Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board are established. 1. Leadership Transition * Co-Leads will continue to provide technical functions * Functions of the Focus Group Program will remain the same. [Lily/Stephanie]

294

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Chairman's Corner  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chairman's Corner Chairman's Corner May 22, 2013 David McAndrew Utility Project Lead DOE FEMP 2 Welcome To San Francisco  Thank you to PG&E for hosting the 2013 Spring FUPWG Seminar!  Special thanks to Chris Gillis and Matt Bergh  Welcome Webinar Participants!  The first half of todays meeting is available via webinar  Webinar participants are encouraged to send questions and feedback to me at David.McAndrew@ee.doe.gov or Susan Courtney at scourtney@energetics.com  Thanks to the Steering Committee  For new folks they are your ambassadors to the group  Together we decide on topics for future seminars  They lead efforts to resolve issues identified by this group 3 FUPWG Code of Conduct Delegates agree to follow the Federal Utility Partnership

295

[Draft minutes of IAPG Mechanical Working Group meeting  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides the draft minutes of the Interagency Advanced Power Group meeting held November 3--4, 1993. Topics addressed are: Materials for thermal management; photovoltaic programs in the Airforce; ground based radar advanced power system development program; battery research; generator prognostics & diagnostics equipment; a thermal flight experiment test program; power systems assessment; Overview: Phillip`s space thermal technologies branch; and development of actuator thermal management.

Skinner, D.M.

1993-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

296

Report of the working group on detector simulation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An ad hoc group at Snowmass reviewed the need for detector simulation to support detectors at the SSC. This report first reviews currently available programs for detector simulation, both those written for single specific detectors and those aimed at general utility. It then considers the requirements for detector simulation for the SSC, with particular attention to enhancements that are needed relative to present programs. Finally, a list of recommendations is given.

Price, L.E.; Lebrun, P.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

Proposed Outline for DOE-LM / NRC Working Group Meeting  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Agenda Agenda Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS) Operable Unit III Biomonitoring Scope and Status Future Scope of Groundwater Treatment June 27, 2011 (8 a.m. - 1 p.m.) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Denver, CO 8:00 a.m. Introduction Objectives and Expected Outcomes: 1. Concur Upon Future Scope of Biomonitoring Program 2. Concur Upon Satisfied OU III Technical Impracticability (TI) Requirements and Identify Data Needs Biomonitoring Scope & Status 8:15 a.m. MMTS Biomonitoring: March 2011 Report Summary and Presentation* 8:45 a.m. Group Discussion Objectives: Review findings: Ensure common understanding of historical & ecological context

298

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Update Washington Update May 22, 2013 Timothy D. Unruh PhD, PE, CEM Program Director DOE FEMP 2 Agenda  FEMP Update New Mission Statement Presidential Performance Contracting Challenge Performance Based Contracting Improvements ENABLE FEMP Activities  Washington Update EO on Industrial Energy Efficiency including CHP White House Green Button Initiative Government Energy Conference  Questions 3 FEMP Update 4  Vision  A compelling vision of the future you are seeking to create  Federal energy management leads national energy management  Purpose  Why you are here  Foster energy leadership FEMP Vision, Purpose, Position 5 Mission FEMP works with key individuals to accomplish energy change within

299

Report of the APS Neutrino Study Reactor Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The worldwide program to understand neutrino oscillations and determine the neutrino mixing parameters, CP violating effects, and mass hierarchy will require a broad combination of measurements. The group believes that a key element of this future neutrino program is a multi-detector neutrino experiment (with baselines of {approx} 200 m and {approx} 1.5 km) with a sensitivity of sin{sup 2} 2{theta}{sub 13} = 0.01. In addition to oscillation physics, the reactor experiment may provide interesting measurements of sin{sup 2} {theta}{sub W} at Q{sup 2} = 0, neutrino couplings, magnetic moments, and mixing with sterile neutrino states. {theta}{sub 13} is one of the twenty-six parameters of the standard model, the best model of electroweak interactions for energies below 100 GeV and, as such, is worthy of a precision measurement independent of other considerations. A reactor experiment of the proposed sensitivity will allow a measurement of {theta}{sub 13} with no ambiguities and significantly better precision than any other proposed experiment, or will set limits indicating the scale of future experiments required to make progress. Figure 1 shows a comparison of the sensitivity of reactor experiments of different scales with accelerator experiments for setting limits on sin{sup 2} 2{theta}{sub 13} if the mixing angle is very small, or for making a measurement of sin{sup 2} 2{theta}{sub 13} if the angle is observable. A reactor experiment with a 1% precision may also resolve the degeneracy in the {theta}{sub 23} parameter when combined with long-baseline accelerator experiments. In combination with long-baseline measurements, a reactor experiment may give early indications of CP violation and the mass hierarchy. The combination of the T2K and Nova long-baseline experiments will be able to make significant measurements of these effects if sin{sup 2} 2{theta}{sub 13} > 0.05 and with enhanced beam rates can improve their reach to the sin{sup 2} 2{theta}{sub 13} > 0.02 level. If {theta}{sub 13} turns out to be smaller than these values, one will need other strategies for getting to the physics. Thus, an unambiguous reactor measurement of {theta}{sub 13} is an important ingredient in planning the strategy for the future neutrino program.

Abouzaid, E.; Anderson, K.; Barenboim, G.; Berger, B.; Blucher, E.; Bolton, T.; Choubey, S.; Conrad, J.; Formaggio, J.; Freedman, S.; Finely, D.; Fisher, P.; Fujikawa, B.; Gai, M.; Goodman, M.; de Goueva, A.; Hadley, N.; Hahn, R.; Horton-Smith, G.; Kadel, R.; Kayser, B.; Heeger, K.; Klein, J.; Learned, J.; Lindner, M.; Link, J.; Luk, K.-B.; McKeown, R.; Mocioiu, I.; Mohapatra, R.; Naples, D.; Peng, J.; Petcov, S.; Pilcher, J.; Rapidis, P.; Reyna, D.; Shaevitz, M.; Shrock, R.; Stanton, N.; Stefanski, R.; Yamamoto, R.; Worcester, M.

2004-10-28T23:59:59.000Z

300

State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Weldon Spring Weldon Spring Site State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site June 1, 2011 - 3:18pm Addthis State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site What does this project do? Goal 1. Protect human health and the environment On Wednesday, June 1, 2011, the Office of Legacy Management (LM) Weldon Spring, Missouri, Site hosted the State and Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) for a half-day tour of the site to provide insight on the daily operations of an LM site. The event was part of the STGWG 2011 Spring

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Statement by Secretary Moniz on IPCC's Working Group Report on Climate Change Mitigation  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz issued a statement on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Working Group report on climate change mitigation.

302

Page 91 (corrected) Table 4.3.1. Working Group on Data Management.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

/CAS WORKING GROUP ON RADIATION FLUXES E. Raschke Germany/GKSS N/A EX­OFFICIO MEMBERS R. Schiffer USA

303

High Temperature Membrane Working Group, Minutes of Meeting on September 14, 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

These meeting minutes provide information about the High Temperature Membrane Working Group meeting on September 14, 2006 in San Francisco, Ca.

304

Blackout 2003: Electric System Working Group Technical Conference- Comments and Recommendations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

December 16, 2003 Electric System Working Group Technical Conference, Philadelphia PA - Summary of comments and recommendations relating to the aftermath of the August 2003 blackout.

305

BILIWG Meeting: DOE Hydrogen Quality Working Group Update and Recent Progress (Presentation)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presented at the 2007 Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group held November 6, 2007 in Laurel, Maryland.

306

Summary of activities in the Working Group on QCD Cascades of the HERA Monte Carlo workshop  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We summarize the activities in working group 10 concerned with QCD cascades, and find that although much work still needs to be done, much progress was made during this workshop in understanding the merits and deficiencies of different programs.

Nick Brook; Leif Lonnblad

1999-08-16T23:59:59.000Z

307

Summary of activities in the Working Group on QCD Cascades of the HERA Monte Carlo workshop  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We summarize the activities in working group 10 concerned with QCD cascades, and find that although much work still needs to be done, much progress was made during this workshop in understanding the merits and deficiencies of different programs.

Brook, N; Brook, Nick; Lonnblad, Leif

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

Management response plan for the Chemical Safety Vulnerability Working Group report. Volume 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Chemical Safety Vulnerability (CSV) Working Group was established to identify adverse conditions involving hazardous chemicals at DOE facilities that might result in fires or explosions, release of hazardous chemicals to the environment, or exposure of workers or the public to chemicals. A CSV Review was conducted in 146 facilities at 29 sites. Eight generic vulnerabilities were documented related to: abandoned chemicals and chemical residuals; past chemical spills and ground releases; characterization of legacy chemicals and wastes; disposition of legacy chemicals; storage facilities and conditions; condition of facilities and support systems; unanalyzed and unaddressed hazards; and inventory control and tracking. Weaknesses in five programmatic areas were also identified related to: management commitment and planning; chemical safety management programs; aging facilities that continue to operate; nonoperating facilities awaiting deactivation; and resource allocations. To address the facility-specific and site-specific vulnerabilities, responsible DOE and site-contractor line organizations have developed initial site response plans. These plans, presented as Volume 2 of this Management Response Plan, describe the actions needed to mitigate or eliminate the facility- and site-specific vulnerabilities identified by the CSV Working Group field verification teams. Initial site response plans are described for: Brookhaven National Lab., Hanford Site, Idaho National Engineering Lab., Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Los Alamos National Lab., Oak Ridge Reservation, Rocky Flats Plant, Sandia National Laboratories, and Savannah River Site.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

309

U.S.-Vietnam Climate Change Working Group | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Vietnam Climate Change Working Group Vietnam Climate Change Working Group Jump to: navigation, search Name U.S.-Vietnam Climate Change Working Group Agency/Company /Organization United States Geological Survey, Government of Vietnam Sector Energy, Land Topics Policies/deployment programs, Background analysis Website http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/CCWG/ Program Start 2008 Country United States, Vietnam UN Region South-Eastern Asia, Northern America References U.S.-Vietnam Climate Change Working Group[1] "The U.S.-Vietnam Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) met in Hanoi from 31 March to 2 April 2010 and developed a program of cooperative work and projects. Priorities for cooperation included: I. To establish benchmark Surface Elevation Table (SET) devices on the Vietnam coast to measure coastal elevation change, the first step in

310

Library Web Standards Recommendations of the SCIS Web Standards Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Library Web Standards Recommendations of the SCIS Web Standards Working Group Prepared by L. Jacobs, J. Head, L. Steinke (1997 February 8) Revised by Web Page Working Group, a sub of the Library. Goals of Library Web Pages: To facilitate access to Library resources To supplement access

Seldin, Jonathan P.

311

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Argonne National Laboratory DC Offices  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Argonne National Laboratory DC Offices 955 REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting December 12, 2006 955 L'Enfant Plaza research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information

312

R&D Plan for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Plan for the Plan for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group Introduction/Background The High Temperature Membrane Working Group was established to provide a forum for greater interaction in the effort to develop high temperature membranes for PEM fuel cells. The goal of this effort is particularly challenging and requires significant fundamental research and development. The Working Group meets twice a year (immediately before or after the Electrochemical Society meeting) and includes universities, national labs, small business and industry and is open to any interested individual/organization. The first meeting was in October, 2000. Working Group members are listed in Appendix A. This plan was developed to guide the R&D activities of the Working Group. The

313

Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 The Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group is a unique public-private partnership recently formed to help guide implementation of the priorities identified in the industry-led Roadmap to Secure Control Systems in the Energy Sector. The group seeks to provide a platform for pursuing innovative and practical activities that will improve the security of the control systems that manage our nation's energy infrastructure. The Group will meet March 25, 2008 in St. Louis Missouri to focus on four objectives: Help identify and implement practical, near-term activities that are high priority for the industry Promote the value to the industry of achieving the goals of the

314

Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 The Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group is a unique public-private partnership recently formed to help guide implementation of the priorities identified in the industry-led Roadmap to Secure Control Systems in the Energy Sector. The group seeks to provide a platform for pursuing innovative and practical activities that will improve the security of the control systems that manage our nation's energy infrastructure. The Group will meet March 25, 2008 in St. Louis Missouri to focus on four objectives: Help identify and implement practical, near-term activities that are high priority for the industry Promote the value to the industry of achieving the goals of the

315

Joint Working Group-39, Manufacturing Technology Subworking Group-F, remote handling and automation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The terms of reference were reviewed and continue to encompass the scope of activities of the SUBWOG. No revisions to the terms of reference were proposed. The list of site contacts who should receive copies of SUBWOG correspondence and meeting minutes was reviewed and updated. Documents exchanged related to the meeting include: Minutes of the sixth SUBOG 39F meeting; transactions of the fifth topical meeting on robotics and remote handling; data on manipulators was forwarded to LLNL from the robotics group at AEA Harwell; and the specifications of the duct remediation robot from the Rocky Flats Plant.

Merrill, R.D.

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

United States-Japan Nuclear Security Working Group Fact Sheet | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

United States-Japan Nuclear Security Working Group Fact Sheet | National United States-Japan Nuclear Security Working Group Fact Sheet | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Fact Sheets > United States-Japan Nuclear Security Working Group Fact Sheet Fact Sheet United States-Japan Nuclear Security Working Group Fact Sheet Mar 27, 2012

317

Interagency Advanced Power Group, Joint Electrical and Nuclear Working Group, meeting minutes, November 16--17, 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Reports on soldier power R&D review, N-MCT power electronic building blocks, silicon carbide power semiconductor work, and ground based radar were made to the Power Conditioning Panel. An introduction to high temperature electronics needs, research and development was made to the High Temperature Electronics Subcommittee. The Pulse Power Panel received reports on the navy ETC gun, and army pulse power. The Superconductivity Panel received reports on high-tc superconducting wires, superconducting magnetic energy storage, and superconducting applications. The Nuclear Working Group received presentations on the Topaz nuclear power program, and space nuclear work in the Department of Energy.

Not Available

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

318

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Meeting Report for May 5-6, 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting May 5-6, 2009 Biloxi, Mississippi Hosted by: Mississippi Power INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. Over 140 individuals attended the meeting. Attendance Representation: * 40 utility officials * 40 Federal agency representatives * 6 National Laboratory representatives * 52 representatives from energy-related organizations (See Appendix 1 for full list of participants and organizations at the end of this report) MEETING PRESENTATIONS

319

Security Working Group Marty Humphrey GRID FORUM DRAFT University of Virginia  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Security Working Group Marty Humphrey GRID FORUM DRAFT University of Virginia Mary Thompson] Security Implications of Typical Grid Computing Usage Scenarios security-implications-01 ways to access the immense computational power of a Computational Grid, each with unique security

Lee, Ruby B.

320

Exploring Chinese Graduate Students' Learner Identity in Group Work in Western Academia: Perceptions, Representations and Challenges  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Group work (GW) is commonly used in many countries around the world. The emerging predominance of GW assignments represents a major trend in higher education (Burdett & Hastie, 2009) as employers highly value teamwork skills and seek the development...

Gao, Junfu

2014-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group Background Paper  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Paper by Arlene Anderson and Tracy Carole presented at the Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group, with a focus on key drivers, purpose, and scope.

322

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Meeting Report for November 19-20, 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting November 19-20, 2008 Williamsburg, Virginia Hosted by: Virginia Natural Gas in Partnership with Energy Systems Group INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The Fall 2008 FUPWG meeting took place in Williamsburg, Virginia from November 19-20 th . Virginia Natural Gas, an AGL Resources Company, hosted the meeting in partnership with Energy Systems Group. 159 individuals attended the meeting, 83 of which were either attending their first FUPWG meeting, or had not attended within the past four years.

323

Working alliance in individual and group cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract The tripartite model of working alliance, including the therapeutic bond and agreement on tasks and goals, was examined in 54 patients who received individual or group cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder (SAD) in a randomized trial. Alliance was significantly stronger in individual relative to group CBT but generally not related to outcome.

Ewa Mörtberg

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

Working Group Presentations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Working Group Working Group Presentations Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » Workshop on The Nation's Needs for Isotopes: Present and Future Working Group Presentations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Group 1 - Stable and Enriched Isotopes Enriched Stable Isotopes and Technical Services at ORNL .pdf file (2.0MB) - Scott Aaron 5-Year Sales Analysis of ORNL Stable Isotopes Inventory Depletion .xls file (19KB) Table for Report .pdf file (41KB)

325

U.S. and India Conclude First Workshop of the Civil Nuclear Working Group |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Conclude First Workshop of the Civil Nuclear Working Conclude First Workshop of the Civil Nuclear Working Group U.S. and India Conclude First Workshop of the Civil Nuclear Working Group January 12, 2006 - 10:31am Addthis Aimed at Fostering Cooperation on Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy MUMBAI, INDIA -- The U.S. and India today concluded a four-day workshop on civilian nuclear energy, building on the U.S.-India Energy Dialogue initiated by President George W. Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in September 2004, and launched by Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman and India Deputy Chairman of Planning Commission Dr. Montek Singh Ahluwalia in May, 2005. The U.S. was represented at the first workshop of the Civil Nuclear Working Group by R. Shane Johnson, acting director of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology. India was

326

July 17, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Safety Standards, 10 CFR 851 Â… Meeting Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 CFR 851 and DOE Safety Standards Implementation 10 CFR 851 and DOE Safety Standards Implementation July 17, 2008 Integrated Executive Summary and Final Action List HSS and the labor unions who participated in the initial 2007 HSS Focus Group meetings agreed to a path forward in which various unions combined to form core working groups to address union identified health and safety issues by topical area. The following is an overview of actions/activities identified in the July 17 HSS/Union meeting to address 851 Rule and DOE Safety Standards implementation issues with focus in the areas of worker involvement and uniformity in 851 awareness and training, and implementation. 1. Identify worker awareness, training and involvement in implementation with regard to 851 at DOE sites. - Follow-up to USW survey. Expand survey to include all unions at DOE sites [Unions]

327

R:\Groups\ENVIRO\Work Requests\2010\Misc\100101_Eastshore Trail\100101_Eastshore Trail Construction CX.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

R:\Groups\ENVIRO\Work Requests\2010\Misc\100101_Eastshore Trail\100101_Eastshore Trail Construction CX.docx R:\Groups\ENVIRO\Work Requests\2010\Misc\100101_Eastshore Trail\100101_Eastshore Trail Construction CX.docx Western Area Power Administration Sierra Nevada Region CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Project Number 100101 Integral Elements Project Title: Eastshore Trail Construction Category of Action: B4.9 Grant or denial of requests for multiple-use of a transmission facility rights-of-way, such as grazing permits and crossing agreements, including electric lines, water lines and drainage culverts. Regulatory Requirements for a Categorical Exclusion Determination: The Department of Energy (DOE), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures, 10 CFR 1021.410(b) require the following determinations be made in order for a proposed action to be categorically excluded (see full text in

328

R:\Groups\ENVIRO\Work Requests\2010\Misc\100101_Eastshore Trail\100101_Eastshore Trail Construction CX.docx  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

R:\Groups\ENVIRO\Work Requests\2010\Misc\100101_Eastshore Trail\100101_Eastshore Trail Construction CX.docx R:\Groups\ENVIRO\Work Requests\2010\Misc\100101_Eastshore Trail\100101_Eastshore Trail Construction CX.docx Western Area Power Administration Sierra Nevada Region CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Project Number 100101 Integral Elements Project Title: Eastshore Trail Construction Category of Action: B4.9 Grant or denial of requests for multiple-use of a transmission facility rights-of-way, such as grazing permits and crossing agreements, including electric lines, water lines and drainage culverts. Regulatory Requirements for a Categorical Exclusion Determination: The Department of Energy (DOE), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures, 10 CFR 1021.410(b) require the following determinations be made in order for a proposed action to be categorically excluded (see full text in

329

R:\Groups\ENVIRO\Work Requests\2010\Misc\100101_Eastshore Trail\100101_Eastshore Trail Construction CX.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

R:\Groups\ENVIRO\Work Requests\2010\Misc\100101_Eastshore Trail\100101_Eastshore Trail Construction CX.docx R:\Groups\ENVIRO\Work Requests\2010\Misc\100101_Eastshore Trail\100101_Eastshore Trail Construction CX.docx Western Area Power Administration Sierra Nevada Region CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Project Number 100101 Integral Elements Project Title: Eastshore Trail Construction Category of Action: B4.9 Grant or denial of requests for multiple-use of a transmission facility rights-of-way, such as grazing permits and crossing agreements, including electric lines, water lines and drainage culverts. Regulatory Requirements for a Categorical Exclusion Determination: The Department of Energy (DOE), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures, 10 CFR 1021.410(b) require the following determinations be made in order for a proposed action to be categorically excluded (see full text in

330

Waste area Grouping 2 Phase I remedial investigation: Sediment and Cesium-137 transport modeling report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is one of five reports issued in 1996 that provide follow-up information to the Phase I Remedial Investigation (RI) Report for Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The five reports address areas of concern that may present immediate risk to public health at the Clinch River and ecological risk within WAG 2 at ORNL. A sixth report, on groundwater, in the series documenting WAG 2 RI Phase I results were part of project activities conducted in FY 1996. The five reports that complete activities conducted as part of Phase I of the Remedial Investigation (RI) for WAG 2 are as follows: (1) Waste Area Grouping 2, Phase I Task Data Report: Seep Data Assessment, (2) Waste Area Grouping 2, Phase I Task Data Report: Tributaries Data Assessment, (3) Waste Area Grouping 2, Phase I Task Data Report: Ecological Risk Assessment, (4) Waste Area Grouping 2, Phase I Task Data Report: Human Health Risk Assessment, (5) Waste Area Grouping 2, Phase I Task Data Report: Sediment and {sup 137}Cs Transport Modeling In December 1990, the Remedial Investigation Plan for Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory was issued (ORNL 1990). The WAG 2 RI Plan was structured with a short-term component to be conducted while upgradient WAGs are investigated and remediated, and a long-term component that will complete the RI process for WAG 2 following remediation of upgradient WAGs. RI activities for the short-term component were initiated with the approval of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV (EPA), and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC). This report presents the results of an investigation of the risk associated with possible future releases of {sup 137}Cs due to an extreme flood. The results are based on field measurements made during storms and computer model simulations.

Clapp, R.B.; Bao, Y.S.; Moore, T.D.; Brenkert, A.L.; Purucker, S.T.; Reece, D.K.; Burgoa, B.B.

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste Technology R&D Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste Technology R&D "Even though one cannot anticipate the answers in basic research, the return on the public's investment can be maximized through long-range planning of the most promising avenues to explore and the resources needed to explore them." (p. v) "Pursuit of this goal entails developing new technologies and advanced facilities, educating young scientists, training a technical workforce, and contributing to the broader science and technology enterprise?." (p. vi) Ref:: "Nuclear Science: A Long Range Plan", DOE/NSF, Feb. 1996. The purpose of this effort is to develop the first iteration of a

332

Long Range Plan Working Group Members | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Long Range Plan Working Group Members Long Range Plan Working Group Members Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) NSAC Home Meetings Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (629KB) NP Committees of Visitors NP Home Members Long Range Plan Working Group Members Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Baker, Keith Hampton University Lung, Allison JLAB Beene, Jim ORNL Marx, Jay LBNL Beise, Betsy University of Maryland McLerran, Larry BNL Bland, Les Indiana University Meyer, Curtis Carnegie-Mellon Bond, Peter BNL Milner, Richard MIT Bowles, Tom LANL Moss, Joel LANL Brenner, Daeg Clark University Mueller, Al Columbia Busza, Wit MIT Mueller, Berndt Duke University Cardman, Larry JLAB Natowitz, Joe Texas A&M Casten, Rick Yale University Nazarewicz, Witek Tennessee/ORNL Cates, Gordon University of Virginia Olinto, Angela

333

2007 Long Range Plan Working Group Members | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2007 Long Range Plan Working Group Members 2007 Long Range Plan Working Group Members Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) NSAC Home Meetings Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (629KB) NP Committees of Visitors NP Home Members 2007 Long Range Plan Working Group Members Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Beise, Elizabeth University of Maryland Merninga, Lia TJNAF Bryman, Douglas TRIUMF Meyer, Curtis Carnegie Mellon University Burrows, Adam University of Arizona Meziani, Zein-Eddine Temple University Cardman, Larry TJNAF Milner, Richard MIT Casten, Richard Yale University Mueller, Berndt Duke University Cates, Gordon University of Virginia Nazarewicz, Witold University of Tennessee Cizewski, Jolie Rutgers University Nitsche, Heino University of California Dean, David ORNL Norris, Margaret LBNL Deshpande, Abhay

334

Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste Technology R&D Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste Technology R&D "Even though one cannot anticipate the answers in basic research, the return on the public's investment can be maximized through long-range planning of the most promising avenues to explore and the resources needed to explore them." (p. v) "Pursuit of this goal entails developing new technologies and advanced facilities, educating young scientists, training a technical workforce, and contributing to the broader science and technology enterprise?." (p. vi) Ref:: "Nuclear Science: A Long Range Plan", DOE/NSF, Feb. 1996. The purpose of this effort is to develop the first iteration of a

335

July 17, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Safety Standards, 10 CFR 851 - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-08 Draft 4-08 Draft HSS/Union Working Group Meeting July 17, 2008 1:00 - 4:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 Call-in: 301-903-9197 SUBJECT: SAFETY STANDARDS / 10 CFR 851 Core Union Working Groups Safety Standards: Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO - Lead International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association (OPCMIA) 10 CFR 851: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW) - Lead Building &Construction Trades Department Center for Construction Research &Training (BCTD CPWR) International Guards Union of America (IGUA) International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE)

336

April 30, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting to address training - Information Package, Part I  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training April 30, 2008 Training April 30, 2008 This page intentionally blank. HSS/Union Working Group Meeting April 30, 2008 1:00 - 3:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 CALL-IN NUMBER: 301-903-6495 SUBJECT: TRAINING Union Working Group Sheet Metal Workers International Association (SMWIA) - Lead Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO Building and Construction Trades Department Center for Construction Research & Training (BCTD CPWR) Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association (OPCMIA) International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) International Guards Union of America (IGUA) International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW)

337

April 30, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Training - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

-28-08 Draft -28-08 Draft HSS/Union Working Group Meeting April 30, 2008 1:00 - 3:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 Call-in: 301-903-6495 SUBJECT: TRAINING Union Working Group Sheet Metal Workers International Association (SMWIA) - Lead Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO Building and Construction Trades Department Center for Construction Research & Training (BCTD CPWR) Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association (OPCMIA) International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) International Guards Union of America (IGUA) International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW)

338

Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group Kick-Off Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy held a kick-off meeting for the Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group (BILIWG) on October 24, 2006, in Baltimore, Maryland. The Working Group is addressing technical challenges to distributed reforming of biomass-derived, renewable liquid fuels to hydrogen, including the reforming, water-gas shift, and hydrogen recovery and purification steps. The meeting provided the opportunity for researchers to share their experiences in converting bio-derived liquids to hydrogen with each other and with members of the DOE Hydrogen Production Technical Team.

339

REPORT OF THE SNOWMASS M6 WORKING GROUP ON HIGH INTENSITY PROTON SOURCES.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The M6 working group had more than 40 active participants (listed in Section 4). During the three weeks at Snowmass, there were about 50 presentations, covering a wide range of topics associated with high intensity proton sources. The talks are listed in Section 5. This group also had joint sessions with a number of other working groups, including E1 (Neutrino Factories and Muon Colliders), E5 (Fixed-Target Experiments), M1 (Muon Based Systems), T4 (Particle Sources), T5 (Beam dynamics), T7 (High Performance Computing) and T9 (Diagnostics). The M6 group performed a survey of the beam parameters of existing and proposed high intensity proton sources, in particular, of the proton drivers. The results are listed in Table 1. These parameters are compared with the requirements of high-energy physics users of secondary beams in Working Groups E1 and E5. According to the consensus reached in the E1 and E5 groups, the U.S. HEP program requires an intense proton source, a 1-4 MW Proton Driver, by the end of this decade.

CHOU,W.; WEI,J.

2001-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

340

OUTLINE FOR THE IPCC WORKING GROUP II CONTRIBUTION TO THE FOURTH ASSESSMENT REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Assessment of Observed Changes and Responses in Natural and Managed Systems · Methods in detectionOUTLINE FOR THE IPCC WORKING GROUP II CONTRIBUTION TO THE FOURTH ASSESSMENT REPORT CLIMATE CHANGE · Scope of this Assessment · Relation to other reports and studies A. ASSESSMENT OF OBSERVED CHANGES 1

Fischlin, Andreas

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Minutes from Durability Working Group (DWG) Kick-off Meeting Contaminants  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

was to bring it up at the 6/29/10 DOE-HQ Fuel Cell Team meeting.) Sharing of information from industrial for incorporation into DTI and Tiax cost analyses. First working group teleconference to be between modelers in conjunction with either the Fuel Cell Seminar or the Electrochemical Society Meeting. A vote was taken

342

Earth Science Data Systems Software Reuse Working Group 2009 Year-end Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Sciences / NASA GSFC, 301-867-2186, albert.j.fleig@nasa.gov Contributing Members: Corey Bettenhausen, Bruce Most, Shahin Samadi, Mark Sherman, Bruce Vollmer, Christine Whalen, Bruce Wilson, Robert Wolfe. 2009 to our interactions with other working groups through joint meetings. Throughout the year, we have held

343

IAU GENERAL ASSEMBLY: RIO 2009 REPORT OF THE IAU WORKING GROUP ON HISTORIC RADIO  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

held on Wednesday 5 August, during Session 2. Four papers (by John Dickel, Bruce McAdam, Harry Wendt. PREAMBLE During the Rio General Assembly we held the following meetings of the Working Group: a Business", and a Science Meeting on "Recent Research". 2. BUSINESS MEETING This meeting was held on Tuesday 4 August

Groppi, Christopher

344

Response to the Phase Two Report of the Working Group on Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Response to the Phase Two Report of the Working Group on Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment Joint Task Force on Accountability University of Massachusetts Amherst October 14, 2011 The Phase Two be constructed that is faithful to the demands of both perspectives? This question has national relevance

Massachusetts at Amherst, University of

345

PALeo-constraints on SEA-level rise (PALSEA) -a PAGES/IMAGES working group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PALeo-constraints on SEA-level rise (PALSEA) - a PAGES/IMAGES working group Coordinators: Mark for the reduction in ice sheets and subsequent rise in sea level over the next century are highly uncertain rise. Interglacial sea levels constrain the global sensitivity of sea-level to radiative forcing. Well

Siddall, Mark

346

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting 2007 Hydrogen Program Annual Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting 2007 Hydrogen Program Annual Review Crystal Laboratory and Elvin Yuzugullu Sentech, Inc. June 28, 2007 #12;SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information exchange and to update the researchers on related

347

Energy Secretary Moniz Announces Formation of Nuclear Energy Tribal Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

WASHINGTON—Building on President Obama’s commitment to strengthen the government-to-government relationship with Tribal Nations, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz today announced the formalization of the Nuclear Energy Tribal Working Group (NETWG), providing a forum for Tribal Leaders to engage with the Department on a wide scope of nuclear energy issues.

348

Service station requirements for safe use of hydrogen based fuels: NHA work group update  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper consists of viewgraphs which summarize the results of the meeting of the working group on safety standards. A standard for an odorant for hydrogen leak detection is set forth. Recent activities with the National Fire Protection Association and the International Standard Organization are enumerated. The path forward is also summarized.

Coutts, D.A. [Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC (United States)

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

349

An Invitation to Join the Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

An Invitation to Join the Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance Working Group The Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance (FSPCA) is a broad-based public-private alliance established in late 2011 for Food Safety and Health (IIT IFSH). The mission of the Alliance is to support safe food production

Saniie, Jafar

350

Euro Working Group on Transportation 2014 Estimating Travel Time Distribution under different Traffic  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Euro Working Group on Transportation 2014 Estimating Travel Time Distribution under different result in an increase in travel time variability and in a decrease in reliability. Reliability becomes of the distribution of travel time is needed to properly estimate these values. Congestion distorts the distribution

Boyer, Edmond

351

November 6, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting on Aging Workforce/Strategic Initiatives - Meeting Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Aging Workforce and Strategic Initiatives Aging Workforce and Strategic Initiatives November 6, 2008 Integrated Executive Summary and Final Action List Background: HSS and the labor unions who participated in the initial 2007 HSS Focus Group meetings agreed to a path forward in which various unions combined to form core working groups to address union identified health and safety issues by topical area. The following is an overview of actions/activities identified in the November 6 HSS/Union meeting to address DOE and interrelated national issues and concerns related to Federal acquisition and contracting, institutionalization of a safety culture, human capital sustainability, and maintaining the U.S. industrial base. 1. Coordinate, increase and improve individual and combined efforts to recruit and

352

April 30, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting to address training Â… Meeting Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

* * * training. * area discussed. Center (NTC) National Training Center. * * * Conduct of Meeting. A 1. 2. 3. 4. HAMMER. HSS/UNION MEETING TO ADDRESS TRAINING DRAFT MEETING SUMMARY Introductory Remarks. Glenn Podonsky made the following points: More than a dialogue, the intent of HSS is to participate in a productive manner, to develop working relationships with the unions, to work the issues, identify actions, and institutionalize a process for addressing and resolving issues to improve worker health and safety throughout the DOE Complex. DOE needs to improve in program implementation in a variety of areas, one of which is HSS will have representatives at each topical meeting related to the functional Representatives from the Offices of Worker Health and Safety (HS-10),

353

July 17, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Safety Standards, 10 CFR 851 - Information Package  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 CFR 851 / Safety Standards 10 CFR 851 / Safety Standards July 17, 2008 July 17, 2008 ds 06-24-08 Draft HSS/Union Working Group Meeting July 17, 2008 1:00 - 4:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 Call-in: 301-903-9197 SUBJECT: SAFETY STANDARDS / 10 CFR 851 Core Union Working Groups Safety Standards: Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO - Lead International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association (OPCMIA) 10 CFR 851: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW) - Lead Building &Construction Trades Department Center for Construction Research &Training (BCTD CPWR) International Guards Union of America (IGUA) International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE)

354

Les Houches 2013: Physics at TeV Colliders: New Physics Working Group Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We present the activities of the "New Physics" working group for the "Physics at TeV Colliders" workshop (Les Houches, France, 3--21 June, 2013). Our report includes new computational tool developments, studies of the implications of the Higgs boson discovery on new physics, important signatures for searches for natural new physics at the LHC, new studies of flavour aspects of new physics, and assessments of the interplay between direct dark matter searches and the LHC.

Brooijmans, G; Fuks, B; Moortgat, F; Richardson, P; Sekmen, S; Weiler, A; Alloul, A; Arbey, A; Baglio, J; Barducci, D; Barr, A J; Basso, L; Battaglia, M; Bélanger, G; Belyaev, A; Bernon, J; Bharucha, A; Bondu, O; Boudjema, F; Boos, E; Buchkremer, M; Bunichev, V; Cacciapaglia, G; Chalons, G; Conte, E; Dolan, M J; Deandrea, A; De Causmaecker, K; Djouadi, A; Dumont, B; Ellis, J; Englert, C; Falkowski, A; Fichet, S; Flacke, T; Gaz, A; Ghezzi, M; Godbole, R; Goudelis, A; Gouzevitch, M; Greco, D; Grober, R; Grojean, C; Guadagnoli, D; Gunion, J F; Herrmann, B; Kalinowski, J; Kim, J H; Kraml, S; Krauss, M E; Kulkarni, S; Lee, S J; Lim, S H; Liu, D; Mahmoudi, F; Maravin, Y; Massironi, A; Mitzka, L; Mohan, K; Moreau, G; Mühlleitner, M M; Nhung, D T; O'Leary, B; Oliveira, A; Panizzi, L; Pappadopulo, D; Pataraia, S; Porod, W; Pukhov, A; Riva, F; Rojo, J; Rosenfeld, R; Ruiz-Álvarez, J; Rzehak, H; Sanz, V; Sengupta, D; Spannowsky, M; Spira, M; Streicher, J; Strobbe, N; Thamm, A; Thomas, M; Torre, R; Waltenberger, W; Walz, K; Wilcock, A; Wulzer, A; Würthwein, F; Wymant, C

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

355

2014-06-09 Issuance: Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group; Notice of Intent  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is a pre-publication notice of intent to establish the regional standards enforcement working group, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on June 9, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through he Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

356

Working Group Meeting Presentation Guidance at a Glance Distributed Reforming of Biomass Pyrolysis Oils  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

(75%) Char (13%) Gas (12%) Catalytic Auto-thermal Reforming of Bio-Oil at 650oC: 0.71 CH1.98O0.76 + 0 Case (Ethanol Case) Bio-oil Storage Tank $106,040 Reformer $803,000 Shift Reactor, PSA, BOP $1 Oils DOE Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group Meeting November 6

357

2014-07-08 Issuance: ASRAC Regional Enforcement Working Group; Notice of Membership  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register notice of membership regarding the ASRAC Regional Enforcement Working Group, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on July 8, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

358

Accomplishments and objectives of the PNC codes and standards working group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper describes the activities of the Pacific Nuclear Council Codes and Standards Working Group during the past several years, and discuss its objectives. The Working Group has met regularly since 1985 to discuss ways to implement the following mission statement: [open quotes]To encourage the use of reasonably consistent criteria for the design, fabrication, construction, testing, operations and maintenance of hardware components, systems, subsystems and structures for the commercial nuclear power plants in the Pacific Basin so as to: Promote comparable safety standards; Encourage commerce among PBNCC member countries; Reduce the costs of fabrication, construction, testing, operation and maintenance; and, Facilitate the sharing of spare parts inventories[close quotes]. During the first few meetings it became apparent that further clarification of the mission statement was necessary to recognize the point that each member country has their own codes and standards and that uniformity of these codes and standards was not the objective of the working group. The objective is more oriented toward achieving a mutual understanding of the codes and standards used in each country so that purchase of items from other countries or sharing spare parts could be accomplished more efficiently. In addition, this prior knowledge of the codes and standards to which components were fabricated could be useful if a problem with a component developed in one country and assistance in solving the problem were to be provided by another country. Evaluation of the differences in codes and standards used by other countries also provides an opportunity to consider other opinions.

Ehrman, C.S. (Burns Roe Company, Oradell, NJ (United States)) Chen, P.-C. (Taiwan Power Company, Taipei (Taiwan, Province of China))

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

US DOE-EM On-Site Disposal Cell Working Group - Fostering Communication On Performance Assessment Challenges  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On-site disposal cells are in use and being considered at several U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) sites as the final disposition for large amounts of waste associated with cleanup of contaminated areas and facilities. These facilities are typically developed with regulatory oversight from States and/or the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in addition to USDOE. The facilities are developed to meet design standards for disposal of hazardous waste as well as the USDOE performance based standards for disposal of radioactive waste. The involvement of multiple and different regulators for facilities across separate sites has resulted in some differences in expectations for performance assessments and risk assessments (PA/RA) that are developed for the disposal facilities. The USDOE-EM Office of Site Restoration formed a working group to foster improved communication and sharing of information for personnel associated with these Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) disposal cells and work towards more consistent assumptions, as appropriate, for technical and policy considerations related to performance and risk assessments in support of a Record of Decision and Disposal Authorization Statement. The working group holds teleconferences, as needed, focusing on specific topics of interest. The topics addressed to date include an assessment of the assumptions used for performance assessments and risk assessments (PA/RAs) for on-site disposal cells, requirements and assumptions related to assessment of inadvertent intrusion, DOE Manual 435.1-1 requirements, and approaches for consideration of the long-term performance of liners and covers in the context of PAs. The working group has improved communication among the staff and oversight personnel responsible for onsite disposal cells and has provided a forum to identify and resolve common concerns.

Seitz, Roger R. [Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States); Suttora, Linda C. [U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Site Restoration, Germantown, MD (United States); Phifer, Mark [Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States)

2014-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

Draft Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2014-2015 in the area of Science with and for Society  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Draft Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2014-2015 in the area of Science with and for Society Important - Page 2 of 51 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction

Greifswald, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

May 21, 2012, Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group 10 C.F.R. 851 Implementation Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

05-21-12 05-21-12 Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group 10 C.F.R. 851 Implementation Work Group Charter In an ongoing effort to further the improvement of health, safety, environmental, and security performance within the Department, DOE is engaged in the establishment of work groups to pursue health and safety improvements across the DOE Complex. These efforts support DOE's responsibility as owner/manager to protect its greatest asset: the worker. The work groups support DOE's integrated safety management system and further DOE's best interests by fostering worker involvement and partnerships to maximize continuity of operations and the

362

Remedial investigation concept plan for the groundwater operable units at the chemical plant area and the ordnance works area, Weldon Spring, Missouri  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of the Army (DA) are conducting cleanup activities at two properties--the DOE chemical plant area and the DA ordnance works area (the latter includes the training area)--located in the Weldon Spring area in St. Charles County, Missouri. These areas are on the National Priorities List (NPL), and cleanup activities at both areas are conducted in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended. DOE and DA are conducting a joint remedial investigation (RI) and baseline risk assessment (BRA) as part of the remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) for the groundwater operable units for the two areas. This joint effort will optimize further data collection and interpretation efforts and facilitate overall remedial decision making since the aquifer of concern is common to both areas. A Work Plan issued jointly in 1995 by DOE and the DA discusses the results of investigations completed at the time of preparation of the report. The investigations were necessary to provide an understanding of the groundwater system beneath the chemical plant area and the ordnance works area. The Work Plan also identifies additional data requirements for verification of the evaluation presented.

NONE

1999-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

363

Working Group Reports Summary of Single-Column Model Intensive Observation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Working Group Reports Summary of Single-Column Model Intensive Observation Period Workshop at Annual Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Science Team Meeting D. A. Randall Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado R. T. Cederwall Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California * Study previous observation simulation system experiments (OSSEs) (i.e., Bill Frank, Pennsylvania State University [PSU]) and conduct OSSEs as necessary to evaluate data network. * Implement additional "boundary" facilities and investigate possible interim capabilities for upcoming SCM IOPs. * Improve resolution of wind profiles observed in lowest 1 km, using data sources such as towers of opportunity, doppler sodar, and doppler radar.

364

2014-10-20 Issuance: ASRAC Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group; Notice of Open Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register notice of open meeting for the ASRAC Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on October 10, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

365

2014-06-09 Issuance: Manufactured Housing Working Group; Notice of Intent  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register? notice of intent to establish the manufactured housing working group to negotiate a notice of proposed rulemaking for energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on June 9, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

366

Proceedings of the IEA Working Group meeting on ferritic/martensitic steels  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An IEA working group on ferritic/martensitic steels for fusion applications, consisting of researchers from Japan, European Union, USA, and Switzerland, met at the headquarters of the Joint European Torus, Culham, UK. At the meeting, preliminary data generated on the large heats of steels purchased for the IEA program and on other heats of steels were presented and discussed. Second purpose of the meeting was to continue planning and coordinating the collaborative test program in progress on reduced-activation ferritic/martensitic steels. The majority of this report consists of viewographs for the presentations.

Klueh, R.L.

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

367

Summary of the Optics, IR, Injection, Operations, Reliability and Instrumentation Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The facilities reported on are all in a fairly mature state of operation, as evidenced by the very detailed studies and correction schemes that all groups are working on. First- and higher-order aberrations are diagnosed and planned to be corrected. Very detailed beam measurements are done to get a global picture of the beam dynamics. More than other facilities the high-luminosity colliders are struggling with experimental background issues, mitigation of which is a permanent challenge. The working group dealt with a very wide rage of practical issues which limit performance of the machines and compared their techniques of operations and their performance. We anticipate this to be a first attempt. In a future workshop in this series, we propose to attempt more fundamental comparisons of each machine, including design parameters. For example, DAPHNE and KEKB employ a finite crossing angle. The minimum value of {beta}*{sub y} attainable at KEKB seems to relate to this scheme. Effectiveness of compensation solenoids and turn-by-turn BPMs etc. should be examined in more detail. In the near future, CESR-C and VEPP-2000 will start their operation. We expect to hear important new experiences from these machines; in particular VEPP-2000 will be the first machine to have adopted round beams. At SLAC and KEK, next generation B Factories are being considered. It will be worthwhile to discuss the design issues of these machines based on the experiences of the existing factory machines.

Wienands, U.; /SLAC; Funakoshi, Y.; /KEK, Tsukuba

2012-04-20T23:59:59.000Z

368

Hydrogen Delivery Pipeline Working Group Workshop September 25-26, 2007 Center for Hydrogen Research, Aiken, GA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hydrogen Delivery Pipeline Working Group Workshop September 25-26, 2007 Center for Hydrogen.............................................................................................................. 1 2. Pipeline Working Group Plans for Round Robin Testing and Routine Research Testing...................................................................................................... 2 3. Facilitated Discussion on Planned DOE Steel Pipeline Routine Research Testing: ASME and PWG

369

UMass Lowell recently worked with Boston-area consulting group Maguire  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

's 2011 Solar Decathlon competition. Team Massachusetts was one of 19 collegiate teams from around Massachusetts Goes to Washington UMass Lowell engineering students (graduate and undergraduate) joined forces with Mass College of Art students to design and build a solar house for the U.S. De- partment of Energy

Massachusetts at Lowell, University of

370

WIPP Facility Work Plan for Solid Waste Management Units and Areas of Concern  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This 2002 Facility Work Plan (FWP) has been prepared as required by Module VII, Permit Condition VII.U.3 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, NM4890139088-TSDF (the Permit) (New Mexico Environment Department [NMED], 1999a), and incorporates comments from the NMED received on December 6, 2000 (NMED, 2000a). This February 2002 FWP describes the programmatic facility-wide approach to future investigations at Solid Waste Management Units (SWMU) and Areas of Concern (AOC) specified in the Permit. The Permittees are evaluating data from previous investigations of the SWMUs and AOCs against the most recent guidance proposed by the NMED. Based on these data, and completion of the August 2001 sampling requested by the NMED, the Permittees expect that no further sampling will be required and that a request for No Further Action (NFA) at the SWMUs and AOCs will be submitted to the NMED. This FWP addresses the current Permit requirements. It uses the results of previous investigations performed at WIPP and expands the investigations as required by the Permit. As an alternative to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility Investigation (RFI) specified in Module VII of the Permit, current NMED guidance identifies an Accelerated Corrective Action Approach (ACAA) that may be used for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). This accelerated approach is used to replace the standard RFI Work Plan and Report sequence with a more flexible decision-making approach. The ACAA process allows a facility to exit the schedule of compliance contained in the facility's Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) permit module and proceed on an accelerated time frame. Thus, the ACAA processcan be entered either before or after an RFI Work Plan. According to the NMED's guidance, a facility can prepare an RFI Work Plan or Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). Based on this guidance, a SAP constitutes an acceptable alternative to the RFI Work Plan specified in the Permit. The NMED accepted that the Permittees are using the ACAA in a letter dated April 20, 2000.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2002-03-05T23:59:59.000Z

371

WIPP Facility Work Plan for Solid Waste Management Units and Areas of Concern  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

his 2002 Facility Work Plan (FWP) has been prepared as required by Module VII,Permit Condition VII.U.3 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, NM4890139088-TSDF (the Permit) (New Mexico Environment Department [NMED], 1999a), and incorporates comments from the NMED received onDecember 6, 2000 (NMED, 2000a). This February 2002 FWP describes the program-matic facility-wide approach to future investigations at Solid Waste Management Units (SWMU) and Areas of Concern (AOC) specified in the Permit. The Permittees are evaluating data from previous investigations of the SWMUs and AOCs against the mostrecent guidance proposed by the NMED. Based on these data, and completion of the August 2001 sampling requested by the NMED, the Permittees expect that no further sampling will be required and that a request for No Further Action (NFA) at the SWMUs and AOCs will be submitted to the NMED. This FWP addresses the current Permit requirements. It uses the results of previous investigations performed at WIPP and expands the investigations as required by the Permit. As an alternative to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)Facility Investigation (RFI) specified in Module VII of the Permit, current NMED guidance identifies an Accelerated Corrective Action Approach (ACAA) that may beused for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). This accelerated approach is used toreplace the standard RFI Work Plan and Report sequence with a more flexible decision-making approach. The ACAA process allows a facility to exit the schedule of compliance contained in the facility's Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) permit module and proceed on an accelerated time frame. Thus, the ACAA process can be entered either before or after an RFI Work Plan. According to the NMED's guidance, a facility can prepare an RFI Work Plan or Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). Based on this guidance, a SAP constitutes an acceptable alternative to the RFI Work Plan specified in the Permit. The NMED accepted that the Permittees are using the ACAA in a letter dated April 20, 2000.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2002-03-05T23:59:59.000Z

372

Working Group Reports Calibration of Radiation Codes Used in Climate Models:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Working Group Reports Calibration of Radiation Codes Used in Climate Models: Comparison of Clear-Sky Calculations with Observations from the Spectral Radiation Experiment and the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program R. G. Ellingson, S. Shen, and J. Warner University of Maryland College Park, Maryland Background The InterComparison of Radiation Codes in Climate Models (ICRCCM) showed large differences between model calculations of longwave fluxes and heating rates-even for clear-sky conditions (Luther et al. 1988). The discrepancies could not be resolved with either pyrgeometer measurements or line-by-line calculations because * Pyrgeometer errors are the magnitude of the discrepancies. * Uncertainties in the physics of line wings and in the proper treatment of the continuum make it impossible

373

Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group (ICEIWG), September 21, 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ICEIWG ICEIWG September 21, 2012 PORTLAND, OREGON Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) 911 NE 11 th Avenue Portland, OR 97232 AGENDA CONFERENCE ROOM C OF BUILDING 911 FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 9:00am MEET AT BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION (BPA) 911 NE 11 th Avenue Portland, OR 98232 ** Continental breakfast will be provided ** ** Please bring a photo ID to meet BPA's security requirements ** 9:15am - 12:00pm 12:30pm - 1:30pm CLOSED SESSION - TRIBAL ICEIWG MEMBERS, AND OTHER TRIBAL LEADERS AND RELATED STAFF ICEIWG Co-Chair Vice Chairman Suppah of the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon will facilitate a closed session to provide ICEIWG tribal members an opportunity to discuss working group

374

Summary for Policymakers IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, WorkingGroup III  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A. Introduction 1. The Working Group III contribution to theIPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) focuses on new literature on thescientific, technological, environmental, economic and social aspects ofmitigation of climate change, published since the IPCC Third AssessmentReport (TAR) and the Special Reports on COB2B Capture and Storage (SRCCS)and on Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate System (SROC).The following summary is organised into six sections after thisintroduction: - Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission trends, - Mitigation in theshort and medium term, across different economic sectors (until 2030), -Mitigation in the long-term (beyond 2030), - Policies, measures andinstruments to mitigate climate change, - Sustainable development andclimate change mitigation, - Gaps in knowledge. References to thecorresponding chapter sections are indicated at each paragraph in squarebrackets. An explanation of terms, acronyms and chemical symbols used inthis SPM can be found in the glossary to the main report.

Barker, Terry; Bashmakov, Igor; Bernstein, Lenny; Bogner,Jean; Bosch, Peter; Dave, Rutu; Davidson, Ogunlade; Fisher, Brian; Grubb,Michael; Gupta, Sujata; Halsnaes, Kirsten; Heij, Bertjan; Kahn Ribeiro,Suzana; Kobayashi, Shigeki; Levine, Mark; Martino, Daniel; MaseraCerutti, Omar; Metz, Bert; Meyer, Leo; Nabuurs, Gert-Jan; Najam, Adil; Nakicenovic, Nebojsa; Rogner, Hans Holger; Roy, Joyashree; Sathaye,Jayant; Schock, Robert; Shukla, Priyaradshi; Sims, Ralph; Smith, Pete; Swart, Rob; Tirpak, Dennis; Urge-Vorsatz, Diana; Zhou, Dadi

2007-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

375

CAD risk profile of the working people in the Dresden area one year after the political changes (DRECAN study)  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

One year after the “de facto unification” of Germany, 3076 working people aged 15 to 65 and living in the Dresden area were examined for their CAD risk profile using the complete PROCAM methodology including d...

W. Jaroß; H. Schulte; S. Bergmann; G. Assmann; T. Freidt…

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

Operable Unit 3-13, Group 3, Other Surface Soils Remediation Sets 4-6 (Phase II) Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan provides the framework for defining the remedial design requirements, preparing the design documentation, and defining the remedial actions for Waste Area Group 3, Operable Unit 3-13, Group 3, Other Surface Soils, Remediation Sets 4-6 (Phase II) located at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center at the Idaho National Laboratory. This plan details the design developed to support the remediation and disposal activities selected in the Final Operable Unit 3-13, Record of Decision.

D. E. Shanklin

2006-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

K.K. Gan Joint SLHC Opto Working Group 1 Results of Opto-Link R&D  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Joint SLHC Opto Working Group 11 K.K. Gan 11 VCSEL Power vs Dosage AOC (5 & 10 Gb/s) survive to SLHC instead of 5,000 fb-1 PIN: Si: TrueLight, Hamamatsu GaAs: AOC, ULM, Optowell VCSEL: AOC, Optowell, ULM? August 08 with 24 GeV/c p (CERN) #12;K.K. Gan Joint SLHC Opto Working Group

Gan, K. K.

378

Proceedings of the IEA working group meeting on ferritic/martensitic steels  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An International Energy Agency (IEA) working group consist- ng of researchers from Japan, the European Union (EU), and the United States, met at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) 16 February 1995 to continue planning a collaborative test program on reduced-activation ferritic/martensitic steels for fusion applications. Plates from a 5-ton, a 1-ton, and three 150 kg heats of reduced-activation martensitic steels have been melted and processed to 7.5- and 15-mm plates in Japan. Plates were delivered in 1994 to the three parties that will participate in the test program. A second 5-ton IEA heat of modified F82H steel was produced in Japan in late 1994, and it was processed into 15- and 25-mm plates, which are to be shipped in February, 1995. Weldments will be produced on plates from this heat, and they will be shipped in April, 1995. At the ORNL meeting, a detailed test program and schedule was presented by the EU representatives, and less detailed programs were presented by the Japanese and US representatives. Detailed program schedules are required from the latter two programs to complete the program planning stage. A meeting is planned for 19--20 September 1995 in Switzerland to continue the planning and coordination of the test program and to present the preliminary results obtained in the collaboration.

Klueh, R.L.

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

Source document for waste area groupings at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document serves as a source document for Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and other types of documents developed for and pertaining to Environmental Restoration (ER) Program activities at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). It contains descriptions of the (1) regulatory requirements for the ORR ER Program, (2) Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) ER Program, (3) ORNL site history and characterization, and (4) history and characterization of Waste Area Groupings (WAGS) 1-20. This document was created to save time, effort, and money for persons and organizations drafting documents for the ER Program and to improve consistency in the documents prepared for the program. By eliminating the repetitious use of selected information about the program, this document will help reduce the time and costs associated with producing program documents. By serving as a benchmark for selected information about the ER Program, this reference will help ensure that information presented in future documents is accurate and complete.

Osborne, P.L.; Kuhaida, A.J., Jr.

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

380

Screening of contaminants in Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Waste Area Grouping 2 (WAG 2) of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is located in the White Oak Creek Watershed and is composed of White Oak Creek Embayment, White Oak Lake and associated floodplain, and portions of White Oak Creek (WOC) and Melton Branch downstream of ORNL facilities. Contaminants leaving other ORNL WAGs in the WOC watershed pass through WAG 2 before entering the Clinch River. Health and ecological risk screening analyses were conducted on contaminants in WAG 2 to determine which contaminants were of concern and would require immediate consideration for remedial action and which contaminants could be assigned a low priority or further study. For screening purposes, WAG 2 was divided into four geographic reaches: Reach 1, a portion of WOC; Reach 2, Melton Branch; Reach 3, White Oak Lake and the floodplain area to the weirs on WOC and Melton Branch; and Reach 4, the White Oak Creek Embayment, for which an independent screening analysis has been completed. Screening analyses were conducted using data bases compiled from existing data on carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic contaminants, which included organics, inorganics, and radionuclides. Contaminants for which at least one ample had a concentration above the level of detection were placed in a detectable contaminants data base. Those contaminants for which all samples were below the level of detection were placed in a nondetectable contaminants data base.

Blaylock, B.G.; Frank, M.L.; Hoffman, F.O.; Hook, L.A.; Suter, G.W.; Watts, J.A.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

work  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

THE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S WORKING CAPITAL FUND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES OCTOBER 1998 AUDIT REPORT CR-B-99-01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT STAFF FROM: William S. Maharay Acting Manager, Capital Regional Audit Office, Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION : Audit Report on the Department's Working Capital Fund BACKGROUND The Department established the Working Capital Fund (Fund) in January 1996 as a financial management tool for charging the costs of common services provided at Headquarters to Departmental program offices. The objectives in establishing the Fund were to increase efficiency of the Department's operations, improve management of administrative services

382

December 4, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting on 2008 HSS/Union Topical Wrap Up - PRIORITY NEAR-TERM ACTION OVERVIEW  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Topical Wrap-Up Meeting Topical Wrap-Up Meeting December 4, 2008 PRIORITY NEAR-TERM ACTION OVERVIEW Background: Union representatives who participated in the initial 2007 HSS Focus Group meetings agreed to a path forward in which various unions combined to form working groups to address union identified health and safety issues by topical area. 2008 meetings were held to specifically address the topical areas of interest and concern related to worker health and safety at DOE sites: Training, 851 Rule Implementation, Former Worker Program/CAIRS Reporting/Central Worker Data Tracking, and Aging Workforce/Strategic Initiatives. The December 4 wrap up was held to distill the integrated actions from all of the 2008 topical meetings into priority actions from which a path forward of specific activities, owners and

383

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Wear a protective helmet if you work in areas where there is  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Wear a protective helmet if you work in areas where meet the specifications contained in American National Standards Institute, Z89.1-1969, Safety the requirements. Hard Hats Safety Tip #16 Use your head: Wear a helmet. #12;Additional Information for Presenters

Minnesota, University of

384

Phase 1 RCRA Facility Investigation and Corrective Measures Study Work Plan for Single Shell Tank Waste Management Areas  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the master work plan for the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) for single-shell tank (SST) farms at the Hanford Site. Evidence indicates that releases at four of the seven SST waste management areas have impacted.

ROGERS, P.M.

2000-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group (BILIWG) Kick-Off Meeting Proceedings Hilton Garden Inn-BWI,Baltimore, MD October 24, 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Proceedings from the October 24, 2006 Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group Kick-Off Meeting.

386

BGRR D&D Presentation for the DOE ERAD Working Group  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

transport vehicle - if required Excavator Hammer at West Wall 21 Wall Cutting with Robot 22 Not all work was able to be done remotely 23 Excavator in the Bioshield 24...

387

Groups  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

groups/all/feed en Buildings groups/all/feed en Buildings http://en.openei.org/community/group/buildings Description: This group is dedicated to discussions about green buildings, energy use in buildings, occupant comfort in buildings, and building technologies. The OpenEI Buildings Community Group will be dedicated to discussions, blogs, and postings about new building technologies, green buildings, energy use in buildings, and occupant experience (comfort levels) in green buildings.group/buildings" target="_blank">read more architecture building reviews buildings technology comfort energy use facilities management green building LEED technologies usgbc

388

Energy Secretary Moniz and Nevada Governor Sandoval Formalize Working Group to Advance Shared Interests at Nevada National Security Site  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

WASHINGTON—Today, U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz and Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to formalize the senior-level Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Working Group, previously established to address issues of interest related to the NNSS.

389

Meeting of The New York State Sustainability Education Working Group Syracuse Center of Excellence In Environmental and Energy Systems  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

In Environmental and Energy Systems 727 East Washington Street Syracuse, New York April 1, 2012 RECOMMENDED ACTIONMeeting of The New York State Sustainability Education Working Group Syracuse Center of Excellence STEPS The Goal: Every graduate of a New York college or university will be literate about how to live

Linsley, Braddock K.

390

Final report of the NRC-Agreement State Working Group to evaluate control and accountability of licensed devices  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

US NRC staff acknowledged that licensees were having problems maintaining control over and accountability for devices containing radioactive material. In June 1995, NRC approved the staff`s suggestion to form a joint NRC-Agreement State Working Group to evaluate the problem and propose solutions. The staff indicated that the Working Group was necessary to address the concerns from a national perspective, allow for a broad level of Agreement State input, and to reflect their experience. Agreement State participation in the process was essential since some Agreement States have implemented effective programs for oversight of device users. This report includes the 5 recommendations proposed by the Working Group to increase regulatory oversight, increase control and accountability of devices, ensure proper disposal, and ensure disposal of orphaned devices. Specifically, the Working Group recommends that: (1) NRC and Agreement States increase regulatory oversight for users of certain devices; (2) NRC and Agreement State impose penalties on persons losing devices; (3) NRC and Agreement States ensure proper disposal of orphaned devices; (4) NRC encourage States to implement similar oversight programs for users of Naturally-Occurring or Accelerator- Produced Material; and (5) NRC encourage non-licensed stakeholders to take appropriate actions, such as instituting programs for material identification.

NONE

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

Close interaction between students and faculty and between students in working groups is a hallmark of the Marketing program  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Marketing Close interaction between students and faculty and between students in working groups is a hallmark of the Marketing program at Stetson. Small classes and sophisticated team projects using business Program The Marketing Career Development Experience is a unique course offering for our Marketing majors

Miles, Will

392

Invited Testimony on the Report from the Panama Canal Stakeholder Working Group 1 Texas Senate Transportation Committee  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Invited Testimony on the Report from the Panama Canal Stakeholder Working Group 1 Texas Senate Transportation Committee Public Hearing December 18, 2012 Invited Testimony Report from the Panama Canal terminals in Texas generated $277 billion in economic value to the state in 2011. The Panama Canal

393

GSDI Legal and Economic Working Group: A Template for Reporting National Legal and Economic Issues Affecting Spatial Data  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

process is the exchange of detailed descriptions of the existing legal and economic framework affectingGSDI Legal and Economic Working Group: A Template for Reporting National Legal and Economic Issues Affecting Spatial Data Infrastructure Developments The primary objective of the GSDI Legal and Economic

Onsrud, Harlan J.

394

Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs Properties Report of the LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This Report summarizes the results of the activities in 2012 and the first half of 2013 of the LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group. The main goal of the working group was to present the state of the art of Higgs Physics at the LHC, integrating all new results that have appeared in the last few years. This report follows the first working group report Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables (CERN-2011-002) and the second working group report Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 2. Differential Distributions (CERN-2012-002). After the discovery of a Higgs boson at the LHC in mid-2012 this report focuses on refined prediction of Standard Model (SM) Higgs phenomenology around the experimentally observed value of 125-126 GeV, refined predictions for heavy SM-like Higgs bosons as well as predictions in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and first steps to go beyond these models. The other main focus is on the extraction of the characteristics and properties of the newly discovered p...

Mariotti, C; Passarino, G; Tanaka, R; Andersen, J R; Artoisenet, P; Bagnaschi, E A; Banfi, A; Becher, T; Bernlochner, F U; Bolognesi, S; Bolzoni, P; Boughezal, R; Buarque, D; Campbell, J; Caola, F; Carena, M; Cascioli, F; Chanon, N; Cheng, T; Choi, S Y; David, A; de Aquino, P; Degrassi, G; Del Re, D; Denner, A; van Deurzen, H; Diglio, S; Di Micco, B; Di Nardo, R; Dittmaier, S; Duhrssen, M; Ellis, R K; Ferrera, G; Fidanza, N; Flechl, M; de Florian, D; Forte, S; Frederix, R; Frixione, S; Gangal, S; Gao, Y; Garzelli, M V; Gillberg, D; Govoni, P; Grazzini, M; Greiner, N; Griffiths, J; Gritsan, A V; Grojean, C; Hall, D C; Hays, C; Harlander, R; Hernandez-Pinto, R; Hoche, S; Huston, J; Jubb, T; Kadastik, M; Kallweit, S; Kardos, A; Kashif, L; Kauer, N; Kim, H; Klees, R; Kramer, M; Krauss, F; Laureys, A; Laurila, S; Lehti, S; Li, Q; Liebler, S; Liu, X; Logan, H E; Luisoni, G; Malberti, M; Maltoni, F; Mawatari, K; Maierhofer, F; Mantler, H; Martin, S; Mastrolia, P; Mattelaer, O; Mazzitelli, J; Mellado, B; Melnikov, K; Meridiani, P; Miller, D J; Mirabella, E; Moch, S O; Monni, P; Moretti, N; Muck, A; Muhlleitner, M; Musella, P; Nason, P; Neu, C; Neubert, M; Oleari, C; Olsen, J; Ossola, G; Peraro, T; Peters, K; Petriello, F; Piacquadio, G; Potter, C T; Pozzorini, S; Prokofiev, K; Puljak, I; Rauch, M; Rebuzzi, D; Reina, L; Rietkerk, R; Rizzi, A; Rotstein-Habarnau, Y; Salam, G P; Sborlini, G; Schissler, F; Schonherr, M; Schulze, M; Schumacher, M; Siegert, F; Slavich, P; Smillie, J M; Stal, O; von Soden-Fraunhofen, J F; Spira, M; Stewart, I W; Tackmann, F J; Taylor, P T E; Tommasini, D; Thompson, J; Thorne, R S; Torrielli, P; Tramontano, F; Tran, N V; Trocsanyi, Z; Ubiali, M; Vanlaer, P; Acosta, M Vazquez; Vickey, T; Vicini, A; Waalewijn, W J; Wackeroth, D; Wagner, C; Walsh, J R; Wang, J; Weiglein, G; Whitbeck, A; Williams, C; Yu, J; Zanderighi, G; Zanetti, M; Zaro, M; Zerwas, P M; Zhang, C; Zirke, T J E; Zuberi, S; Heinemeyer, S

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

395

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group (DWG) Meeting Thursday, October 13, 2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical Team on Sept. 14, 2011. Tech Team comments were: 1 #12; v Anode/Cathode flow must be constant. Brosha (LANL), and Nissan Technical Center North America (NTCNA) to test Pt/C and their support materials electrochemically-active surface area loss, but Nissan protocol only takes ~8 hrs and NREL protocol takes ~24 hrs

396

made with materials that can offer convenient areas to sit or rest while working (Figure 4).  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Containers using light-weight pots and soil mixes can be placed on wheeled caddies for easy and convenient. If you want to learn more about horticulture through training and volunteer work, ask your Extension, Va. Tech" to The Virginia Gardener, Department of Horticulture, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 124061

Liskiewicz, Maciej

397

2007 DOE Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group (BILIWG) Meeting  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Ozkan* November 6th, 2007 Heterogeneous Catalysis Research Group Department of Chemical Post combustionPost combustion BiomassBiomass Solid residueSolid residue FertilizerFertilizerCOCO22Reforming reactorClosedClosed Carbon LoopCarbon Loop combustioncombustion HH22 #12;Technical Approach Development

398

RCRA Facility Investigation report for Waste Area Grouping 6 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents compiled information concerning a facility investigation of waste area group 6(WAG-6), of the solid waste management units (SWMU's) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The WAG is a shallow ground disposal area for low-level radioactive wastes and chemical wastes. The report contains information on hydrogeological data, contaminant characterization, radionuclide concentrations, risk assessment and baseline human health evaluation including a toxicity assessment, and a baseline environmental evaluation.

Not Available

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

399

Phase 1 RCRA Facility Investigation & Corrective Measures Study Work Plan for Single Shell Tank (SST) Waste Management Areas  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the master work plan for the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) Corrective Action Program (RCAP) for single-shell tank (SST) farms at the US. Department of Energy's (DOE'S) Hanford Site. The DOE Office of River Protection (ORP) initiated the RCAP to address the impacts of past and potential future tank waste releases to the environment. This work plan defines RCAP activities for the four SST waste management areas (WMAs) at which releases have contaminated groundwater. Recognizing the potential need for future RCAP activities beyond those specified in this master work plan, DOE has designated the currently planned activities as ''Phase 1.'' If a second phase of activities is needed for the WMAs addressed in Phase 1, or if releases are detected at other SST WMAs, this master work plan will be updated accordingly.

MCCARTHY, M.M.

1999-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

September 16, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Former Worker and Energy Compensation Programs, CAIRS Reporting, Central Worker Data Tracking Â… Meeting Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 10-10-08 Draft 7 10-10-08 Draft HSS/Union Meeting To Address Former Worker and Energy Employee Occupational Illness Compensation Programs, CAIRS Reporting, and Central Worker Data Tracking September 16, 2008 Integrated Executive Summary and Final Action List Background: HSS and the labor unions who participated in the initial 2007 HSS Focus Group meetings agreed to a path forward in which various unions combined to form core working groups to address union identified health and safety issues by topical area. The following is an overview of actions/activities identified in the September 16 HSS/Union meeting to address Former Worker and the Energy Employee Occupational Illness Compensation Programs, CAIRS Reporting, and Central Worker Data Tracking interests and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Draft RAD Worker Training Reciprocity Program for Work Group v.1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training Reciprocity Program (TRP) Establishing DOE Radworker Training Reciprocity between DOE Contractors and Sites 2 Introduction Since 2009, the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) has sought to improve worker safety and health training through a partnership with the National Training Center (NTC), the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and the Volpentest HAMMER Training and Education Center (HAMMER). Under the guidance of the HSS/Union Focus Group, this partnership hosted a series of workshops across the DOE complex to discuss training reciprocity and standardization. The Partnership has made tremendous progress in furthering the goal of enhancing

402

Report of the Snowmass M6 Working Group on high intensity proton sources  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. high-energy physics program needs an intense proton source, a 1-4 MW Proton Driver (PD), by the end of this decade. This machine will serve as a stand-alone facility that will provide neutrino superbeams and other high intensity secondary beams such as kaons, muons, neutrons, and anti-protons (cf. E1 and E5 group reports) and also serve as the first stage of a neutrino factory (cf. M1 group report). It can also be a high brightness source for a VLHC. Based on present accelerator technology and project construction experience, it is both feasible and cost-effective to construct a 1-4 MW Proton Driver. Two recent PD design studies have been made, one at FNAL and the other at the BNL. Both designed PD's for 1 MW proton beams at a cost of about U.S. $200M (excluding contingency and overhead) and both designs were upgradeable to 4 MW. An international collaboration between FNAL, BNL and KEK on high intensity proton facilities is addressing a number of key design issues. The superconducting (sc) RF cavities, cryogenics, and RF controls developed for the SNS can be directly adopted to save R&D efforts, cost, and schedule. PD studies are also actively being pursued at Europe and Japan.

Weiren Chou and J. Wei

2002-08-20T23:59:59.000Z

403

Waste Area Group 10, Operable Unit 10-08, Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Annual Status Report for Fiscal Year 2006  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides a status of the progress made in Fiscal Year 2006 on tasks identified in the Waste Area Group 10, Operable Unit 10-08, Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan. Major accomplishments include: (1) groundwater sampling and review of the groundwater monitoring data, (2) installation of a Sitewide groundwater-level monitoring network, (3) update of the Groundwater Monitoring and Field Sampling Plan of Operable Unit 10-08, (4) re-evaluation of the risk at Site TSF-08, (5) progress on the Operable Unit 10-08 Sitewide Groundwater Model.

R. P. Wells

2007-05-09T23:59:59.000Z

404

Understanding the Participation of Marginal Groups in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and Lyon 2007) and in other cases failed miserably (Martin 2007; Depoe, Delicath, and Elsenbeer 2004; Wells, Brandon, and Hannah 1992). ____________ This dissertation follows the style of Society & Natural Resources. 2 An extensive amount... ? Integrated conservation and development programs (Wells, Brandon, and Hannah 1992) ? Focus ?Protected areas ? Conservation of biodiversity by reconciling the management of protected areas with socio-economic needs of the local people 1.2.3 CBNRM...

Dahal, Smriti

2012-02-14T23:59:59.000Z

405

December 4, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting on 2008 HSS/Union Topical Wrap Up - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Union Working Group Meeting Union Working Group Meeting December 4, 2008 1:00 - 4:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 SUBJECT: 2008 HSS/Union Topical Wrap Up Meeting Facilitation by 2008 Topical Union Leads Ron Ault/Tom Schaffer............... AFL-CIO Metal Trades Department Pete Stafford/Patricia Quinn/.............Building and Construction Trades Department Center for Don Ellenberger Construction Research & Training (BCTD CPWR) Dennis Phelps.............................International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers [IBEW] Gary Batykefer/Dale Hill...............Sheet Metal Workers International Association [SMWIA] James Frederick/Doug Stephens/ ......United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Tom McQuiston Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW)

406

November 6, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting on Aging Workforce/Strategic Initiatives - Package Bookmark  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strategic Initiatives Strategic Initiatives Aging Workforce November 6, 2008 November 6, 2008 Strategic Initiatives Aging Workforce November 6, 2008 The information contained in this package is intended to be reference materials pertaining to the November 6, 2008 HSS/Union working group meeting. The informational pieces have been retrieved from the Internet or submitted by HSS and Union representatives for inclusion in the package, and does not necessarily reflect the view, support, or endorsement of all of the participating organizations. 10-20-08 Draft HSS/Union Working Group Meeting November 6, 2008 1:00 - 3:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 Call-in: 301-903-9196 SUBJECT: STRATEGIC INITIATIVES Meeting Facilitation Ron Ault/Tom Schaffer..............................Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO

407

April 30, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting to address training - Union Participants  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HSS/UNION MEETING: TRAINING HSS/UNION MEETING: TRAINING HSS/Union Participants/Attendees HSS Participants: 1. Glenn Podonsky - Chief Health, Safety & Security Officer 2. Mari-Jo Campagnone - Senior Advisor to Chief HSS Officer 3. Bill Roege - Director, Corporate Safety Analysis 4. Pat Worthington - Director, Health and Safety 5. Bill McArthur - Director, Worker Safety & Health Policy 6. Tom Traceski - Director, Environmental Policy and Assistance 7. Jeff Harrell - Director, National Training Center [Call-in] UNION Group Participants: 1. Gary Batykefer - SMWIA (Lead/Meeting Facilitation) 2. Dale Hill - SMWIA (Lead/Meeting Facilitation) 3. Don Ellenberger - BCTD CPWR 4. Emmett Russell - IUOE 5. Barb McCabe - IUOE 6. Ron Ault - Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO 7.

408

Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group (ICEIWG) January 26, 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ICEIWG January 26, 2012 GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY Wild Horse Pass Hotel & Casino 5040 Wild Horse Pass Boulevard Chandler, AZ 85226 (520) 796-7272 Action Items DRAFT PURCHASING POLICY GUIDANCE  The draft policy guidance was distributed to ICEIWG at the Portland meeting in October 2011. IE is accepting comments from ICEIWG as they arise.  The goal is to get final comments and to work through the internal review process. Once that is finalized, it will go through the formal leadership review process so that it can be published as draft policy guidance. This will kick-off formal consultations with tribes. IE would like to get the draft out to Indian country for comment and consultation by the end of February.  IE will send out a "Dear Tribal Leader" letter in regards to the consultations to all tribes and will

409

Solar America Initiative State Working Group: Final Scientific/Technical Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Through the support from the Department of Energy, NARUC has educated thousands of stakeholders, including Public Utility Commissioners, commission staff, and State energy officials on solar energy technology, implementation, and policy. During the lifetime of this grant, NARUC staff engaged stakeholders in policy discussions, technical research, site visits, and educational meetings/webinars/materials that provided valuable education and coordination on solar energy technology and policy among the States. Primary research geared toward State decision-makers enabled stakeholders to be informed on current issues and created new solar energy leaders throughout the United States. Publications including a Frequently Asked Questions guide on feed-in tariffs and a legal analysis of state implementation of feed-in tariffs gave NARUC members the capacity to understand complex issues related to the economic impacts of policies supportive of solar energy, and potential paths for implementation of technology. Technical partnerships with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) instructed NARUC members on feed-in tariff policy for four States and solar PV resource assessment in seven States, as well as economic impacts of solar energy implementation in those States. Because many of the States in these technical partnerships had negligible amounts of solar energy installed, this research gave them new capacity to understand how policies and implementation could impact their constituency. This original research produced new data now available, not only to decision-makers, but also to the public at-large including educational institutions, NGOs, consumer groups, and other citizens who have an interest in solar energy adoption in the US. Under this grant, stakeholders engaged in several dialogs. These educational opportunities brought NARUC members and other stakeholders together several times each year, shared best practices with State decision-makers, fostered partnerships and relationships with solar energy experts, and aided in increasing the implementation of smart policies that will foster solar technology deployment. The support from the Department of Energyâ??s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy has created solar energy leaders in the States; leaders who will serve to be a continuing valuable resource as States consider adoption of new low-carbon and domestic energy supply to meet the energy needs of the United States.

Julie Taylor

2012-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

410

AREA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AREA AREA FAQ # Question Response 316 vs DCAA FAQ 1 An inquiry from CH about an SBIR recipient asking if a DCAA audit is sufficient to comply with the regulation or if they need to add this to their audit they have performed yearly by a public accounting firm. 316 audits are essentially A-133 audits for for-profit entities. They DO NOT replace DCAA or other audits requested by DOE to look at indirect rates or incurred costs or closeouts. DCAA would never agree to perform A-133 or our 316 audits. They don't do A-133 audits for DOD awardees. The purpose of the audits are different, look at different things and in the few instances of overlap, from different perspectives. 316

411

September 2002 Working Group Meeting on Heavy Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag: Presentations and Summary of Comments and Conclusions  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A Working Group Meeting on Heavy Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag was held at NASA Ames Research Center on September 23, 2002. The purpose of the meeting was to present and discuss technical details on the experimental and computational work in progress and future project plans. Representatives from the Department of Energy (DOE)/Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy/Office of FreedomCAR & Vehicle Technologies, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), NASA Ames Research Center (NASA), University of Southern California (USC), California Institute of Technology (Caltech), Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI), Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Freightliner, and Portland State University participated in the meeting. This report contains the technical presentations (viewgraphs) delivered at the Meeting, briefly summarizes the comments and conclusions, and outlines the future action items. The meeting began with an introduction by the Project Lead Rose McCallen of LLNL, where she emphasized that the world energy consumption is predicted to relatively soon exceed the available resources (i.e., fossil, hydro, non-breeder fission). This short fall is predicted to begin around the year 2050. Minimizing vehicle aerodynamic drag will significantly reduce our Nation's dependence on foreign oil resources and help with our world-wide fuel shortage. Rose also mentioned that educating the populace and researchers as to our world energy issues is important and that our upcoming United Engineering Foundation (UEF) Conference on ''The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles: Trucks, Busses, and Trains'' was one way our DOE Consortium was doing this. Mentioned were the efforts of Fred Browand from USC in organizing and attracting internationally recognized speakers to the Conference. Rose followed with an overview of the DOE project goals, deliverables, and FY03 activities. The viewgraphs are attached at the end of this report. Sid Diamond of DOE discussed the reorganization of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and that the Office of Heavy Vehicle Technology is now part of the Office of FreedomCAR & Vehicle Technologies. Sid reviewed the FY03 budget and provided information on some plans for FY04. The soon to be posted DOE request for proposals from industry for projects related to parasitic energy losses was discussed. A minimum of 50% cost share by industry will be required and the proposal must be submitted by industry. Collaborative efforts in aerodynamic drag with members of the DOE consortium are encouraged. Sid also mentioned interest in aerodynamic drag contribution due to wheel wells and underbody flow. Sid also mentioned his continued interest in the application of our computational and experimental expertise to the area of locomotive and railcar aerodynamics for the reduction of drag effects and thus, the reduction of fuel consumption by trains. In summary, the technical presentations at the meeting included a review of experimental results and plans by GTRI, USC, and NASA Ames, the computational results from LLNL and SNL for the integrated tractor-trailer benchmark geometry called the Ground Transportation System (GTS) model, and by LLNL for the tractor-trailer gap and trailer wake flow, and turbulence model development and benchmark simulations being investigated by Caltech. USC is also investigating an acoustic drag reduction device that has been named ''Mozart'', GTRI continues their investigation of a blowing device, and LLNL presented their ideas for 2 new base drag reduction devices. ANL presented their plans for a DOE supported Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with Paccar Truck Company utilizing commercial software tools to simulate the flow and drag for an actual tractor and showed the results of some preliminary griding attempts. The attendees also had the opportunity to tour the 12-ft pressure wind tunnel the machine shop were the Generic Conventional Model (GCM, a.k.a. SLRT) was being readied for the scheduled November experiments. Much of

McCallen, R

2002-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

413

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory waste area groups 1--7 and 10 Technology Logic Diagram. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Technology Logic Diagram was developed to provide technical alternatives for environmental restoration projects at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. The diagram (three volumes) documents suggested solutions to the characterization, retrieval, and treatment phases of cleanup activities at contaminated sites within 8 of the laboratory`s 10 waste area groups. Contaminated sites at the laboratory`s Naval Reactor Facility and Argonne National Laboratory-West are not included in this diagram.

O`Brien, M.C.; Meservey, R.H.; Little, M.; Ferguson, J.S.; Gilmore, M.C.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

Site characterization plan for groundwater in Waste Area Grouping 1 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 1 Groundwater Operable Unit (OU) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, is undergoing a site characterization to identify environmental contamination that may be present. This document, Site Characterization Report for Groundwater in Waste Area Grouping I at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, identifies areas of concern with respect to WAG 1 groundwater and presents the rationale, justification, and objectives for conducting this continuing site characterization. This report summarizes the operations that have taken place at each of the areas of concern in WAG 1, summarizes previous characterization studies that have been performed, presents interpretations of previously collected data and information, identifies contaminants of concern, and presents an action plan for further site investigations and early actions that will lead to identification of contaminant sources, their major groundwater pathways, and reduced off-site migration of contaminated groundwater to surface water. Site characterization Activities performed to date at WAG I have indicated that groundwater contamination, principally radiological contamination, is widespread. An extensive network of underground pipelines and utilities have contributed to the dispersal of contaminants to an unknown extent. The general absence of radiological contamination in surface water at the perimeter of WAG 1 is attributed to the presence of pipelines and underground waste storage tank sumps and dry wells distributed throughout WAG 1 which remove more than about 40 million gal of contaminated groundwater per year.

Lee, R.R.; Curtis, A.H.; Houlberg, L.M.; Purucker, S.T.; Singer, M.L.; Tardiff, M.F.; Wolf, D.A.

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

The NIAC Convergence of Physical and Cyber Technbologies and Related Security Management Challenges Working Group Final Report and Recommendations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

T T T H H E E N N I I A A C C C C O O N N V V E E R R G G E E N N C C E E O O F F P P H H Y Y S S I I C C A A L L A A N N D D C C Y Y B B E E R R T T E E C C H H N N O O L L O O G G I I E E S S A A N N D D R R E E L L A A T T E E D D S S E E C C U U R R I I T T Y Y M M A A N N A A G G E E M M E E N N T T C C H H A A L L L L E E N N G G E E S S W W O O R R K K I I N N G G G G R R O O U U P P F F I I N N A A L L R R E E P P O O R R T T A A N N D D R R E E C C O O M M M M E E N N D D A A T T I I O O N N S S B B Y Y T T H H E E C C O O U U N N C C I I L L J J A A N N U U A A R R Y Y 1 1 6 6 , , 2 2 0 0 0 0 7 7 MARGARET E. GRAYSON WORKING GROUP CO-CHAIR PRESIDENT GRAYSON AND ASSOCIATES GREGORY PETERS WORKING GROUP CO-CHAIR MANAGING PARTNER COLLECTIVE IQ GEORGE CONRADES WORKING GROUP CO-CHAIR EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.........................................................................................1 Working Group Members:

416

2014-05-05 Issuance: ASRAC Commercial and Industrial Pumps Working Group; Notice of Open Teleconference/Webinar  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register notice of open teleconference/webinar regarding the commercial and industrial pumps working group, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on May 5, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

417

Analysis of power loss data for the 200 Area Tank Farms in support of K Basin SAR work  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An analysis of power loss data for the 200 Area Tank Farms was performed in support of K Basin safety analysis report work. The purpose of the analysis was to establish a relationship between the length of a power outage and its yearly frequency. This relationship can be used to determine whether the duration of a specific power loss is a risk concern. The information was developed from data contained in unusual occurrence reports (UORs) spanning a continuous period of 19.75 years. The average frequency of power loss calculated from the UOR information is 1.22 events per year. The mean of the power loss duration is 32.5 minutes an the median duration is 2 minutes. Nine events resulted in loss of power to both 200 East and 200 West areas simultaneously. Seven events (not necessarily the same events that resulted in loss of power to both 200 areas) resulted in outage durations exceeding 5 minutes. Approximately one-half of the events were caused by human error. The other half resulted from natural phenomena or equipment failures. None of the outages were reported to have any adverse effect on the tank farms.

Shultz, M.V. Jr.

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

SCM Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

cloud microphysical parameterizations cloud microphysical parameterizations with SCM, CAPT and M-PACE observations X. Liu (PNNL) S. Xie, J. Boyle, S. Klein (LLNL) S. J. Ghan (PNNL) H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR) Goal: Improve Climate Model Parameterizations Tools: single column models (SCM) and DOE CCPP-ARM Parameterization Testbed (CAPT) (LLNL CAPT team) ARM measurements provide unique data for model evaluation and guidance for parameterization improvement Motivations Cloud microphysics in mixed-phase clouds has a significant impact on cloud radiative forcing, precipitation formation, etc. The treatment of mixed-phase clouds in most current climate models is often oversimplified Liquid/ice partitioning according to a temperature dependent function; Neglect ice nucleation and Bergeron-Findeisen

419

Buildings Sector Working Group  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

heating, cooking, lighting, and refrigeration * Hurdle rates - Update using latest Johnson Controls reports regarding commercial investment decisions * ENERGY STAR buildings -...

420

Macro Industrial Working Group  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

your attention 22 Industrial Team Washington DC, September 29, 2014 Macro Team: Kay Smith (lead) (202) 586-1132 | kay.smith@eia.gov Vipin Arora (202) 586-1048 |...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

21st Century jobs initiative - building the foundations for a 21st Century economy. Appendix A, cluster working group initiative business plans  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The business and community leaders who participated in a four-month long series of working groups developed business plans for initiatives which would lead to further growth and competitiveness of each of the industrial clusters. This appendix contains those business plans as they stood at the end of the working group session mid-September, 1995.

NONE

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

Feasibility study for remedial action for the groundwater operable units at the chemical plant area and the ordnance works area, Weldon Spring, Missouri  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of Army (DA) are conducting an evaluation to identify the appropriate response action to address groundwater contamination at the Weldon Spring Chemical Plant (WSCP) and the Weldon Spring Ordnance Works (WSOW), respectively. The two areas are located in St. Charles County, about 48 km (30 rni) west of St. Louis. The groundwater operable unit (GWOU) at the WSCP is one of four operable units being evaluated by DOE as part of the Weldon Spring Site Remedial Action Project (WSSRAP). The groundwater operable unit at the WSOW is being evaluated by the DA as Operable Unit 2 (OU2); soil and pipeline contamination are being managed under Operable Unit 1 (OU1). Remedial activities at the WSCP and the WSOW are being conducted in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Consistent with DOE policy, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) values have been incorporated into the CERCLA process. A remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) work plan summarizing initial site conditions and providing site hydrogeological and exposure models was published in August of 1995 (DOE 1995). The remedial investigation (RI) and baseline risk assessment (BRA) have also recently been completed. The RI (DOE and DA 1998b) discusses in detail the nature, extent, fate, and transport of groundwater and spring water contamination. The BRA (DOE and DA 1998a) is a combined baseline assessment of potential human health and ecological impacts and provides the estimated potential health risks and ecological impacts associated with groundwater and springwater contamination if no remedial action were taken. This feasibility study (FS) has been prepared to evaluate potential options for addressing groundwater contamination at the WSCP and the WSOW. A brief description of the history and environmental setting of the sites is presented in Section 1.1, key information relative to the nature and extent of contamination is presented in Section 1.2, and the results of the BRA are summarized in Section 1.3. The objective of this FS is discussed in Section 1.4, and preliminary remediation goals are identified in Section 1.5. The organization of the remaining chapters of this FS is outlined in Section 1.6.

NONE

1999-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

423

Waste Area Group 10, Operable Unit 10-08, Annual Monitoring Status Report for Fiscal Year 2009  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the status of Fiscal Year 2009 groundwater monitoring performed in Waste Area Group 10 at the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho National Laboratory Site, as identified in the Groundwater Monitoring and Field Sampling Plan for Operable Unit 10-08. Twelve of the fourteen required wells were sampled, and all ten required intervals from the Westbay wells were sampled. Two wells were not sampled because they were in the process of being converted into multiple-sample-interval Westbay wells by the U.S. Geological Survey. Groundwater samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds identified on the Contract Laboratory Program target analyte list as well as metals (filtered), anions, and radionuclides (i.e., I-129, tritium, Tc-99, gross alpha, gross beta, and Sr-90). No contaminant exceeded maximum contaminant levels in wells along the southern boundary of the Idaho National Laboratory Site or in guard wells. Iron was above its secondary maximum contaminant level of 300 ug/L in one well. The cause of the elevated iron concentration is uncertain. Lead was detected just below its action level. However, the zinc concentration was also elevated in these wells, and the source of the lead is probably galvanized riser pipe in the wells. Once the galvanized pipe is replaced, both lead and zinc concentrations should decline, as has been observed at other Waste Area Group 10 wells.

Howard Forsythe

2010-02-04T23:59:59.000Z

424

Environmental, safety, and health plan for the remedial investigation of Waste Area Grouping 10, Operable Unit 3, at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document outlines the environmental, safety, and health (ES&H) approach to be followed for the remedial investigation of Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 10 at Oak at Ridge National Laboratory. This ES&H Plan addresses hazards associated with upcoming Operable Unit 3 field work activities and provides the program elements required to maintain minimal personnel exposures and to reduce the potential for environmental impacts during field operations. The hazards evaluation for WAG 10 is presented in Sect. 3. This section includes the potential radiological, chemical, and physical hazards that may be encountered. Previous sampling results suggest that the primary contaminants of concern will be radiological (cobalt-60, europium-154, americium-241, strontium-90, plutonium-238, plutonium-239, cesium-134, cesium-137, and curium-244). External and internal exposures to radioactive materials will be minimized through engineering controls (e.g., ventilation, containment, isolation) and administrative controls (e.g., procedures, training, postings, protective clothing).

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

DFAS Wide-Area Workflow Issues  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the DFAS wide-area workflow issues and is given at the Spring 2011 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting.

426

Screening of contaminants in Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Waste Area Grouping 2 (WAG 2) of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is located in the White Oak Creek Watershed and is composed of White Oak Creek Embayment, White Oak Lake and associated floodplain, and portions of White Oak Creek (WOC) and Melton Branch downstream of ORNL facilities. Contaminants leaving other ORNL WAGs in the WOC watershed pass through WAG 2 before entering the Clinch River. Health and ecological risk screening analyses were conducted on contaminants in WAG 2 to determine which contaminants were of concern and would require immediate consideration for remedial action and which contaminants could be assigned a low priority or further study. For screening purposes, WAG 2 was divided into four geographic reaches: Reach 1, a portion of WOC; Reach 2, Melton Branch; Reach 3, White Oak Lake and the floodplain area to the weirs on WOC and Melton Branch; and Reach 4, the White Oak Creek Embayment, for which an independent screening analysis has been completed. Screening analyses were conducted using data bases compiled from existing data on carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic contaminants, which included organics, inorganics, and radionuclides. Contaminants for which at least one ample had a concentration above the level of detection were placed in a detectable contaminants data base. Those contaminants for which all samples were below the level of detection were placed in a nondetectable contaminants data base.

Blaylock, B.G.; Frank, M.L.; Hoffman, F.O.; Hook, L.A.; Suter, G.W.; Watts, J.A.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

Public Participation Plan for Waste Area Group 7 Operable Unit 7-13/14 at the Idaho National Laboratory Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Public Participation Plan outlines activities being planned to: (1) brief the public on results of the remedial investigation and feasibility study, (2) discuss the proposed plan for remediation of Operable Unit 7-13/14 with the public, and (3) encourage public participation in the decision-making process. Operable Unit 7-13/14 is the Comprehensive Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study for Waste Area Group 7. Analysis focuses on the Subsurface Disposal Area (SDA) within the Radioactive Waste Management Complex at the Idaho National Laboratory (Site). This plan, a supplement to the Idaho National Laboratory Community Relations Plan (DOE-ID 2004), will be updated as necessary. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will participate in the public involvement activities outlined in this plan. Collectively, DOE, DEQ, and EPA are referred to as the Agencies. Because history has shown that implementing the minimum required public involvement activities is not sufficient for high-visibility cleanup projects, this plan outlines additional opportunities the Agencies are providing to ensure that the public’s information needs are met and that the Agencies can use the public’s input for decisions regarding remediation activities.

B. G. Meagher

2007-07-17T23:59:59.000Z

428

Remedial investigation report on Waste Area Grouping 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Volume 2 -- Appendix A: Characterization methods and data summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides the Environmental Restoration Program with information about the results of investigations performed at Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 5. It includes information on risk assessments that have evaluated long-term impacts to human health and the environment. Information provided in this document forms the basis for decisions regarding the need for subsequent remediation work at WAG 5. This appendix presents background regulatory and technical information regarding the solid waste management units (SWMUs) at WAG 5 to address requirements established by the Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) for the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR). The US Department of Energy (DOE) agreed to conduct remedial investigations (RIs) under the FFA at various sites at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), including SWMUs and other areas of concern on WAG 5. The appendix gives an overview of the regulatory background to provide the context in which the WAG 5 RI was planned and implemented and documents how historical sources of data, many of which are SWMU-specific, were evaluated and used.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

CSEWG SYMPOSIUM, A CSWEG RETROSPECTIVE. 35TH ANNIVERSARY CROSS SECTION EVALUATION WORKING GROUP, NOV. 5, 2001, BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This publication has been prepared to record some of the history of the Cross Section Evaluation Working Group (CSEWG). CSEWG is responsible for creating the evaluated nuclear data file (ENDF/B) which is widely used by scientists and engineers who are involved in the development and maintenance of applied nuclear technologies. This organization has become the model for the development of nuclear data libraries throughout the world. The data format (ENDF) has been adopted as the international standard. On November 5, 2001, a symposium was held at Brookhaven National Laboratory to celebrate the 50 th meeting of the CSEWG organization and the 35 th anniversary of its first meeting in November 1966. The papers presented in this volume were prepared by present and former CSEWG members for presentation at the November 2001 symposium. All but two of the presentations are included. I have included an appendix to list all of the CSEWG members and their affiliations, which has been compiled from the minutes of each of the CSEWG meetings. Minutes exist for all meetings except the 4 th meeting held in January 1968. The list includes 348 individuals from 71 organizations. The dates for each of the 50 CSEWG meetings are listed. The committee structure and chairmen of all committees and subcommittees are also included in the appendix. This volume is dedicated to three individuals whose foresight and talents made CSEWG possible and successful. They are Henry Honeck who lead the effort to develop the ENDF format and the CSEWG system, Ira Zartman, the Atomic Energy Commission program manager who provided the programmatic direction and support, and Sol Pearlstein who led the development of the CESWG organization and the ENDF/B evaluated nuclear data library.

DUNFORD, C.; HOLDEN, N.; PEARLSTEIN, S.

2001-11-05T23:59:59.000Z

430

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Waste Area Groups 1-7 and 10 Technology Logic Diagram. Volume 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) Technology Logic Diagram (TLD) was developed to provide a decision support tool that relates Environmental Restoration (ER) and Waste Management (WM) problems at the INEL to potential technologies that can remediate these problems. The TLD identifies the research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation needed to develop these technologies to a state that allows technology transfer and application to an environmental restoration need. It is essential that follow-on engineering and system studies be conducted to build on the output of this project. These studies will begin by selecting the most promising technologies identified in this TLD and finding an optimum mix of technologies that will provide a socially acceptable balance between cost and risk to meet the site windows of opportunity. The TLD consists of three separate volumes: Volume I includes the purpose and scope of the TLD, a brief history of the INEL Waste Area Groups, and environmental problems they represent. A description of the TLD, definitions of terms, a description of the technology evaluation process, and a summary of each subelement, is presented. Volume II (this volume) describes the overall layout and development of the TLD in logic diagram format. This section addresses the environmental restoration of contaminated INEL sites. Specific INEL problem areas/contaminants are identified along with technology solutions, the status of the technologies, precise science and technology needs, and implementation requirements. Volume III provides the Technology Evaluation Data Sheets (TEDS) for Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) activities that are referenced by a TEDS codenumber in Volume II. Each of these sheets represents a single logic trace across the TLD. These sheets contain more detail than provided for technologies in Volume II.

O`Brien, M.C.; Meservey, R.H.; Little, M.; Ferguson, J.S.; Gilmore, M.C.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

431

Groundwater quality monitoring well installation for Waste Area Grouping at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the drilling and installation of 18 groundwater quality monitoring (GQM) wells on the perimeter of Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 11. WAG 11 (White Wing Scrap Yard) is located on the west end of East Fork Ridge between White Wing Road and the Oak Ridge Turnpike. The scrap yard is approximately 25 acres in size. The wells at WAG 11 were drilled and developed between January 1990 and October 1990. These wells were installed to characterize and assess the WAG in accordance with applicable Department of Energy, state, and Environmental Protection Agency regulatory requirements. The wells at WAG 11 were drilled with auger or air rotary rigs. Depending on the hydrogeologic conditions present at each proposed well location, one of four basic installation methods was utilized. Detailed procedures for well construction were specified by the Engineering Division to ensure that the wells would provide water samples representative of the aquifer. To ensure conformance with the specifications, Energy Systems Construction Engineering and ERCE provided continuous oversight of field activities. The purpose of the well installation program was to install GQM wells for groundwater characterization at WAG 11. Data packages produced during installation activities by the ERCE hydrogeologists are an important product of the program. These packages document the well drilling, installation, and development activities and provide valuable data for well sampling and WAG characterization. The forms contained in the packages include predrilling and postdrilling checklists, drilling and construction logs, development and hydraulic conductivity records, and quality control-related documents.

Mortimore, J.A.; Lee, T.A.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

September 16, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Former Worker and Energy Compensation Programs, CAIRS Reporting, Central Worker Data Tracking - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Working Group Meeting Working Group Meeting September 16, 2008 1:00 - 3:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 SUBJECT: Former Worker/Energy Compensation Programs CAIRS Reporting Central Worker Data Tracking Meeting Facilitation: Building &Construction Trades Department Center for Construction Research &Training [Pete Stafford, Patricia Quinn] Agenda I. Former Worker Screening: Outreach, Improved Facilitation, Collective efforts and issues 1. Screening Programs (historical and future needs) - OccMed/contractor interaction - Program improvements [i.e., aspects of latent chronic illness] - Subcontractor population - Improved program management -- Standards for preventing future cases [Proper screening/tracking] -- Address contractor; production vs. construction; Complex wide portability

433

New Pump and Treat Facility Remedial Action Work Plan For Test Area North Final Groundwater Remediation, Operable Unit 1-07B  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This remedial action work plan identifies the approach and requirements for implementing the medial zone remedial action for Test Area North, Operable Unit 1-07B, at the Idaho National Laboratory. This plan details the management approach for the construction and operation of the New Pump and Treat Facility (NPTF). As identified in the remediatial design/remedial action scope of work, a separate remedial design/remedial action work plan will be prepared for each remedial component of the Operable Unit 1-07B remedial action.

Nelson, L. O.

2007-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

434

Students of the B.Sc Electronic Engineering have the ability to work in the positions listed below and related areas within the Electronics Industry worldwide  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Students of the B.Sc Electronic Engineering have the ability to work in the positions listed below and related areas within the Electronics Industry worldwide: INTRA Programme B.Eng Electronic Engineering is to produce graduates who have: Programme Outline: The B.Eng Electronic Engineering is designed to provide

Humphrys, Mark

435

European Working Group on Non Lethal Weapons 6th European Symposium Page 1 TOWARDS A TEST STANDARD FOR CONDUCTED ENERGY WEAPONS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

European Working Group on Non Lethal Weapons ­ 6th European Symposium Page 1 TOWARDS A TEST STANDARD FOR CONDUCTED ENERGY WEAPONS Andy Adler, David Dawson Carleton University, Ottawa ON Canada ABSTRACT: Conducted Energy Weapons (CEWs) are increasingly used by police in many countries as a less

Adler, Andy

436

IUFRO Landscape Ecology Working Group International Conference, 2127 September, 2010 Bragana, Symposium 7: A landscape approach to sustainable forest management: the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

IUFRO Landscape Ecology Working Group International Conference, 2127 September, 2010 Bragança, Portugal Symposium 7: A landscape approach to sustainable forest management: the challenge to adaptive the resulting impacts on land use and biota, the option of adapting land use and landscapes to mitigate

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

437

By the National Wetlands Working Group / Edited by B.G. Warner and C.D.A. Rubec The Canadian Wetland Classification System  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

By the National Wetlands Working Group / Edited by B.G. Warner and C.D.A. Rubec The Canadian Wetland Classification System Second Edition #12; 1997 by the Wetlands Research Centre, University Wetlands Conservation Council (Canada) · Wetlands Research Centre, University of Waterloo Copies

Laval, Université

438

RCRA Facility Investigation report for Waste Area Grouping 6 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Volume 2, Sections 4 through 9: Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents compiled information concerning a facility investigation of waste area group 6(WAG-6), of the solid waste management units (SWMU`s) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The WAG is a shallow ground disposal area for low-level radioactive wastes and chemical wastes. The report contains information on hydrogeological data, contaminant characterization, radionuclide concentrations, risk assessment and baseline human health evaluation including a toxicity assessment, and a baseline environmental evaluation.

Not Available

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Russ Miller Dr. Miller is world-renowned for his seminal work in areas of parallel algorithms for the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to parallel algorithms and computer science education" and was presented with International Scientist to be unsolvable. This work was recognized by the IEEE with its inclusion in the IEEE poster "Top 10 Algorithms as Distinguished Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at SUNY-Buffalo and senior scientist at the Hauptman

Miller, Russ

440

A history of the working group to address Los Alamos community health concerns - A case study of community involvement and risk communication  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In May 1991, at a Department of Energy (DOE) public hearing at Los Alamos, New Mexico, a local artist claimed there had been a recent brain tumor cluster in a small Los Alamos neighborhood. He suggested the cause was radiation from past operations of Los Alamos National Laboratory. Data from the Laboratory's extensive environmental monitoring program gave no reason to believe this charge to be true but also could not prove it false. These allegations, reported in the local and regional media, alarmed the community and revealed an unsuspected lack of trust in the Laboratory. Having no immediate and definitive response, the Laboratory offered to collaborate with the community to address this concern. The Los Alamos community accepted this offer and a joint Community-Laboratory Working Group met for the first time 29 days later. The working group set as its primary goal the search for possible carcinogens in the local environment. Meanwhile, the DOE announced its intention to fund the New Mexico Department of Health to perform a separate and independent epidemiological study of all Los Alamos cancer rates. In early 1994, after commissioning 17 environmental studies and meeting 34 times, the working group decided that the public health concerns had been resolved to the satisfaction of the community and voted to disband. This paper tells the story of the artist and the working group, and how the media covered their story. It summarizes the environmental studies directed by the working group and briefly reviews the main findings of the epidemiology study. An epilogue records the present-day recollections of some of the key players in this environmental drama.

Harry Otway; Jon Johnson

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Work plan for focused feasibility study of the toxic burning pits area at J-Field, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Environmental Management Division (EMD) of Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), Maryland, is conducting a remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS) of the J-Field area at APG pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (CERCIA). J-Field is within the Edgewood Area of APG in Harford County, Maryland. Since World War II, activities in the Edgewood Area have included the development, manufacture, testing, and destruction of chemical agents and munitions. These materials were destroyed at J-Field by open burning and open detonation (OB/OD). Considerable archival information about J-Field exists as a result of efforts by APG staff to characterize the hazards associated with the site. Contamination of J-Field was first detected during an environmental survey of the Edgewood Area conducted in 1977 and 1978 by the US Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency (USATHAMA)(predecessor to the US Army Environmental Center). As part of a subsequent USATHAMA environmental survey, 11 wells were installed and sampled at J-Field. Contamination at J-Field was also detected during a munitions disposal survey conducted by Princeton Aqua Science in 1983. The Princeton Aqua Science investigation involved the installation and sampling of nine wells and the collection and analysis of surficial and deep composite soil samples. In 1986, a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permit (MD3-21-0021355) requiring a basewide RCRA Facility Assessment (RFA) and a hydrogeologic assessment of J-Field was issued by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In 1987, the US Geological Survey (USGS) began a two-phased hydrogeologic assessment in which data were collected to model groundwater flow at J-Field. Soil gas investigations were conducted, several well clusters were installed, a groundwater flow model was developed, and groundwater and surface water monitoring programs were established that continue today-

Biang, C.; Benioff, P.; Martino, L.; Patton, T.

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

Area G Perimeter Surface-Soil Sampling Environmental Surveillance for Fiscal Year 1998 Hazardous and Solid Waste Group (ESH-19)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Material Disposal Area G (Area G) is at Technical Area 54 at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Area G has been the principal facility for the disposal of low-level, solid-mixed, and transuranic waste since 1957. It is currently LANL's primary facility for radioactive solid waste burial and storage. As part of the annual environmental surveillance effort at Area G, surface soil samples are collected around the facility's perimeter to characterize possible radionuclide movement off the site through surface water runoff During 1998, 39 soil samples were collected and analyzed for percent moisture, tritium, plutonium-238 and 239, cesium-137 and americium-241. To assess radionuclide concentrations, the results from these samples are compared with baseline or background soil samples collected in an undisturbed area west of the active portion Area G. The 1998 results are also compared to the results from analogous samples collected during 1996 and 1997 to assess changes over this time in radionuclide activity concentrations in surface soils around the perimeter of Area G. The results indicate elevated levels of all the radionuclides assessed (except cesium-137) exist in Area G perimeter surface soils vs the baseline soils. The comparison of 1998 soil data to previous years (1996 and 1997) indicates no significant increase or decrease in radionuclide concentrations; an upward or downward trend in concentrations is not detectable at this time. These results are consistent with data comparisons done in previous years. Continued annual soil sampling will be necessary to realize a trend if one exists. The radionuclide levels found in the perimeter surface soils are above background but still considered relatively low. This perimeter surface soil data will be used for planning purposes at Area G, techniques to prevent sediment tm.nsport off-site are implemented in the areas where the highest radionuclide concentrations are indicated.

Marquis Childs

1999-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

Chernobyl Studies Project - working group 7.0 environmental transport and health effects. Progress report, October 1993--January 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE-funded Chernobyl Studies Project was begun as part of a cooperative agreement between the US and the former USSR, (quote) To develop jointly methods to project rapidly the health effects of any future reactor accident (quote). Most of the initial tasks for this project are completed or near completion. The focus has now turned primarily to the issue of health effects from the Chernobyl accident. Currently, we are extensively engaged in case-control and cohort studies of thyroid diseases among Belarussian children and in the Ukraine. A major part of the effort is providing methods and applications of dose reconstruction and providing support and equipment for the medical teams. This document contains reports on progress in the following task areas: Management; External Dose; Hydrological Transport; Chromosome Painting Dosimetry; Stochastic Effects; Thyroid Studies; and Leukemia Studies.

Hendrickson, S.M. [ed.

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

September 16, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Former Worker and Energy Compensation Programs, CAIRS Reporting, Central Worker Data Tracking - Information Package  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Former Worker/Energy Compensation DOE Former Worker/Energy Compensation CAIRS Central Worker Data Tracking September 16, 2008 September 16, 2008 CAIRS Central Worker Data Tracking September 16, 2008 n The information contained in this package is intended to be reference materials pertaining to the September 16, 2008 HSS/Union working group meeting. The informational pieces have been retrieved from the Internet or submitted by HSS and Union representatives for inclusion in the package, and does not necessarily reflect the view, support, or endorsement of all of the participating organizations. Agenda 08-19-08 Draft HSS/Union Working Group Meeting September 16, 2008 1:00 - 3:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 SUBJECT: Former Worker/Energy Compensation Programs CAIRS Reporting Central Worker Data Tracking

445

New Pump and Treat Facility Remedial Action Work Plan for Test Area North (TAN) Final Groundwater Remediation, Operable Unit 1-07B  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This remedial action work plan identifies the approach and requirements for implementing the medical zone remedial action for Test Area North, Operable Unit 1-07B, at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). This plan details management approach for the construction and operation of the New Pump and Treat Facility. As identified in the remedial design/remedial action scope of work, a separate remedial design/remedial action work plan will be prepared for each remedial component of the Operable Unit 1-07B remedial action. This work plan was originally prepared as an early implementation of the final Phase C remediation. At that time, The Phase C implementation strategy was to use this document as the overall Phase C Work Plan and was to be revised to include the remedial actions for the other remedial zones (hotspot and distal zones). After the completion of Record of Decision Amendment: Technical Support Facility Injection Well (TSF-05) and Surrounding Groundwater Contamination (TSF-23) and Miscellaneous No Action Sites, Final Remedial Action, it was determined that each remedial zone would have it own stand-alone remedial action work plan. Revision 1 of this document converts this document to a stand-alone remedial action plan specific to the implementation of the New Pump and Treat Facility used for plume remediation within the medical zone of the OU 1-07B contaminated plume.

D. Vandel

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

446

2014-08-07 Issuance: Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee (ASRAC)- Manufactured Housing Working Group; Notice of Open Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register notice of open meeting regarding the Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee (ASRAC) - Manufactured Housing Working Group on August 7, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

447

Waste management plan for the remedial investigation/feasibility study of Waste Area Grouping 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This plan defines the criteria and methods to be used for managing waste generated during activities associated with Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). WAG 5 is located in Melton Valley, south of the main ORNL plant area. It contains 17 solid waste management units (SWMUs) to be evaluated during the remedial investigation. The SWMUs include three burial areas, two hydrofracture facilities, two settling ponds, eight tanks, and two low-level liquid waste leak sites. These locations are all considered to be within the WAG 5 area of contamination (AOC). The plan contains provisions for safely and effectively managing soils, rock cuttings, development and sampling water, decontamination fluids, and disposable personal protective equipment (PPE) consistent with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance of May 1991 (EPA 1991). Consistent with EPA guidance, this plan is designed to protect the environment and the health and safety of workers and the public.

Not Available

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

448

Waste management plan for the remedial investigation/feasibility study of Waste Area Grouping 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoratin Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This plan defines the criteria and methods to be used for managing waste generated during activities associated with Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). WAG 5 is located in Melton Valley, south of the main ORNL plant area. It contains 17 solid waste management units (SWMUs) to be evaluated during the remedial investigation. The SWMUs include three burial areas, two hydrofracture facilities, two settling ponds, eight tanks, and two low-level liquid waste leak sites. These locations are all considered to be within the WAG 5 area of contamination (AOC). The plan contains provisions for safely and effectively managing soils, rock cuttings, development and sampling water, decontamination fluids, and disposable personal protective equipment (PPE) consistent with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance of May 1991 (EPA 1991). Consistent with EPA guidance, this plan is designed to protect the environment and the health and safety of workers and the public.

Not Available

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

449

Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Meeting agenda, summary and proposed Radworker Training Reciprocity Program Meeting Dates: July 10 - 11

450

American Society of Mechanical Engineers/Savannah River National Laboratory (ASME/SRNL) Materials and Components for Hydrogen Infrastructure Codes and Standards Workshop and the DOE Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Pipeline Working Group Workshop Pipeline Working Group Workshop September 25-26, 2007 ♦ Center for Hydrogen Research, Aiken, GA WORKSHOP SUMMARY Table of Contents 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................. 1 2. Pipeline Working Group Plans for Round Robin Testing and Routine Research Testing ...................................................................................................... 2 3. Facilitated Discussion on Planned DOE Steel Pipeline Routine Research Testing: ASME and PWG Workshop Participants ............................................. 2 4. Facilitated Discussion on Next Steps for Hydrogen Delivery Research: ASME and PWG Workshop Participants.......................................................................... 4

452

2014-08-19 Issuance Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee (ASRAC)- Central Air Conditioner Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group; Notice of Open Meetings  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is a pre-publication Federal Registe notice of open meetings regarding the Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee (ASRAC) - Central Air Conditioner Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on August 19, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

453

2014-07-21 Issuance: Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Adivsory Committee (ASRAC)- Manufactured Housing Working Group; Notice of Open Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register notice of public meeting for the Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee (ASRAC) - Manufactured Housing Working Group, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on July 21, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register ?publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

454

Feasibility study report: Area of Contamination (AOC) 43J. (Fort Devens, Groups 2 and 7 sites). Final feasibility study report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Army Environmental Center directed ABB Environmental Services, Inc. (ABB-ES), under Contract No. DAAA15-91-D-0008, to conduct a Remedial Investigation (RI) and Feasibility Study (FS) to address the contamination of soil and groundwater at Area of Contamination (AOC) 43J at Fort Devens, Massachusetts. This FS Report is prepared as part of the FS process in accordance with the 1988 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) guidance document entitled Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies under CERCLA. The purpose of the FS Report is to initially identify and screen potentially feasible alternatives to control human health and environmental risks at AOC 43J. Following this screening, the FS Report presents a detailed analysis and comparative analysis of the retained alternatives.

NONE

1996-06-06T23:59:59.000Z

455

Cleanroom Work Support Component Areas  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Satisfactory cleanroom operations require adequate support components. The same care in design required for the cleanroom proper must also be used in layout ... and activities that are carried out in the cleanroom

Alvin Lieberman

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

ARM Aerosol Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Overview of the An Overview of the C Overview of the An Overview of the C C loud and loud and La La nd nd S S urface urface I I nteractions nteractions C C ampaign ampaign (CLASIC) (CLASIC) ARM Science Team Meeting March 13 th , 2008 Norfolk, VA Jason Tomlinson Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Introduction Archive Website WIKI Overview * The primary goal of CLASIC is to improve understanding of the physics of the early stages of cumulus cloud convection as it relates to land surface conditions, and to translate this new understanding into improved representations in GCMs and regional climate models 1 Overview * ARM Southern Great Plains Climate Research Facility - June 8-July 2, 2007 * Nine participating aircraft - In-situ * CIRPAS Twin Otter * Cessna 206 * Duke University Helicopter Observation Platform

457

Massachusetts Wind Working Group Meeting  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

The meeting will feature a panel presentation and discussion on Shadow-Flicker, as well as updates related to the Community Wind Outreach Initiative.   Panel speakers so far include: Elizabeth King...

458

ARM Aerosol Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and MFRSR Measurements ARM STM 2008 Norfolk, VA Connor Flynn 1 , Annette Koontz 1 , Anne Jefferson 2 , Jim Barnard 1 , Sally McFarlane 1 1 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 2 CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder Progress towards ARM DOE 2008 Performance Metric 3 & 4 * Produce and make available new continuous time series of aerosol total column depth, based on results from the AMF deployment in Niger, Africa. * Produce and make available new continuous time series of retrieved dust properties, based on results from the AMF deployment in Niger, Africa. 0 100 200 300 400 0 20 40 60 80 100 ITF movement and surface RH % RH day of year (2006) 0 100 200 300 400 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 day of year wind direction (N = 0, E = 90) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Wind speed m/s 0 100 200 300 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 MFRSR Vo for filter2, Niamey

459

Preparation of a technology development roadmap for the Accelerator Transmutation of Waste (ATW) System : report of the ATW separations technologies and waste forms technical working group.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In response to a Congressional mandate to prepare a roadmap for the development of Accelerator Transmutation of Waste (ATW) technology, a Technical Working Group comprised of members from various DOE laboratories was convened in March 1999 for the purpose of preparing that part of the technology development roadmap dealing with the separation of certain radionuclides for transmutation and the disposal of residual radioactive wastes from these partitioning operations. The Technical Working Group for ATW Separations Technologies and Waste Forms completed its work in June 1999, having carefully considered the technology options available. A baseline process flowsheet and backup process were identified for initial emphasis in a future research, development and demonstration program. The baseline process combines aqueous and pyrochemical processes to permit the efficient separation of the uranium, technetium, iodine and transuranic elements from the light water reactor (LWR) fuel in the head-end step. The backup process is an all- pyrochemical system. In conjunction with the aqueous process, the baseline flowsheet includes a pyrochemical process to prepare the transuranic material for fabrication of the ATW fuel assemblies. For the internal ATW fuel cycle the baseline process specifies another pyrochemical process to extract the transuranic elements, Tc and 1 from the ATW fuel. Fission products not separated for transmutation and trace amounts of actinide elements would be directed to two high-level waste forms, one a zirconium-based alloy and the other a glass/sodalite composite. Baseline cost and schedule estimates are provided for a RD&D program that would provide a full-scale demonstration of the complete separations and waste production flowsheet within 20 years.

Collins, E.; Duguid, J.; Henry, R.; Karell, E.; Laidler, J.; McDeavitt, S.; Thompson, M.; Toth, M.; Williamson, M.; Willit, J.

1999-08-12T23:59:59.000Z

460

Field Sampling and Analysis Plan for the Remedial Investigation of Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Responses to comments  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides responses to US Environmental Protection Agency Region IV EPA-M and Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Oversite Division (TDEC-O) comments on report ORNL/ER-58, Field Sampling and Analysis Plan for the Remedial Investigation of Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 2 consists of the White Oak Creek (WOC) drainage system downgradient of the major ORNL WAGs in the WOC watershed. A strategy for the remedial investigation (RI) of WAG2 was developed in report ES/ER-14&Dl, Remedial Investigation Plan for Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This strategy takes full advantage of WAG2`s role as an integrator of contaminant releases from the ORNL WAGs in the WOC watershed, and takes full advantage of WAG2`s role as a conduit for contaminants from the ORNL site to the Clinch River. The strategy calls for a multimedia environmental monitoring and characterization program to be conducted in WAG2 while upgradient contaminant sources are being remediated. This monitoring and characterization program will (1) identify and quantify contaminant fluxes, (2) identify pathways of greatest concern for human health and environmental risk, (3) improve conceptual models of contaminant movement, (4) support the evaluation of remedial alternatives, (5) support efforts to prioritize sites for remediation, (6) document the reduction in contaminant fluxes following remediation, and (7) support the eventual remediation of WAG2. Following this strategy, WAG2 has been termed an ``integrator WAG,`` and efforts in WAG2 over the short term are directed toward supporting efforts to remediate the contaminant ``source WAGS`` at ORNL.

Not Available

1992-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Sampling and analysis plan for the site characterization of the waste area Grouping 1 groundwater operable unit at Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 1 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) includes all of the former ORNL radioisotope research, production, and maintenance facilities; former waste management areas; and some former administrative buildings. Site operations have contaminated groundwater, principally with radiological contamination. An extensive network of underground pipelines and utilities have contributed to the dispersal of contaminants to a known extent. In addition, karst geology, numerous spills, and pipeline leaks, together with the long and varied history of activities at specific facilities at ORNL, complicate contaminant migration-pathway analysis and source identification. To evaluate the extent of contamination, site characterization activity will include semiannual and annual groundwater sampling, as well as monthly water level measurements (both manual and continuous) at WAG 1. This sampling and analysis plan provides the methods and procedures to conduct site characterization for the Phase 1 Remedial Investigation of the WAG 1 Groundwater Operable Unit.

NONE

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

Surveillance and maintenance plan for Waste Area Groupings at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, for FY 1993--2002. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Waste Area Grouping (WAG) Surveillance and Maintenance (S&M) program was designed for the management of sites contaminated with radioactive materials and/or hazardous chemicals from the end of their operating life until final facility disposition or site stabilization in accordance with environmental regulations and good management practices. Program objectives include (1) S&M of sites/facilities awaiting final disposition; (2) planning for safe and orderly final closure at each site/facility; and (3) implementing a program to accomplish final disposition in a safe, cost-effective, and timely manner.

Ford, M.K.; Holder, L. Jr.; Jones, R.G.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

463

Surveillance and maintenance plan for Waste Area Groupings at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, for FY 1993--2002  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Waste Area Grouping (WAG) Surveillance and Maintenance (S M) program was designed for the management of sites contaminated with radioactive materials and/or hazardous chemicals from the end of their operating life until final facility disposition or site stabilization in accordance with environmental regulations and good management practices. Program objectives include (1) S M of sites/facilities awaiting final disposition; (2) planning for safe and orderly final closure at each site/facility; and (3) implementing a program to accomplish final disposition in a safe, cost-effective, and timely manner.

Ford, M.K.; Holder, L. Jr.; Jones, R.G.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Remedial investigation report on waste area grouping 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Volume 4, Appendix C, Risk assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 5 is part of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and is located on the United States Department of Energy`s Oak Ridge Reservation (DOE-ORR). The site lies southeast of Haw Ridge in Melton Valley and comprises approximately 32 ha (80 ac) [12 ha (30 ac) of forested area and the balance in grassed fields]. Waste Area Grouping 5 consists of several contaminant source areas for the disposal of low-level radioactive, transuranic (TRU), and fissile wastes (1959 to 1973) as well as inorganic and organic chemical wastes. Wastes were buried in trenches and auger holes. Radionuclides from buried wastes are being transported by shallow groundwater to Melton Branch and White Oak Creek. Different chemicals of potential concern (COPCs) were identified (e.g., cesium-137, strontium-90, radium-226, thorium-228, etc.); other constituents and chemicals, such as vinyl chloride, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, trichloroethene, were also identified as COPCs. Based on the results of this assessment contaminants of concern (COCs) were subsequently identified. The objectives of the WAG 5 Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment (BHHRA) are to document the potential health hazards (i.e., risks) that may result from contaminants on or released from the site and provide information necessary for reaching informed remedial decisions. As part of the DOE-Oak Ridge Operations (ORO), ORNL and its associated waste/contamination sites fall under the auspices of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as Superfund under the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). The results of the BHHRA will (1) document and evaluate risks to human health, (2) help determine the need for remedial action, (3) determine chemical concentrations protective of current and future human receptors, and (4) help select and compare various remedial alternatives.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

465

December 4, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting on 2008 HSS/Union Topical Wrap Up - Union Lead Action Priorities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TOPICAL LEAD PRIORITY ACTION SUBMITTALS FOR TOPICAL LEAD PRIORITY ACTION SUBMITTALS FOR DECEMBER 4 HSS/UNION TOPICAL WRAP UP MEETING SMWIA Submittal of Action Priorities: The priorities below reflect SMWIA/training subcommittee input for moving forward in 2009 and beyond. 1. A pre-requisite requirement of OSHA-10 Hour Training for workers to gain access to DOE sites 2. Standardized training requirements across the DOE network of facilities supported by the NIEHS model for support for all building trades and sub crafts 3. Support for the 851 requirements as an onsite delivery training initiative or pre- work requirement 4. Utilization of the HAMMER model for hands on training with peer group instructors in local training facilities or HAMMER, and recognize and utilize virtual...CBT/web-based training component(s) when applicable.

466

Health and safety plan for the Remedial Investigation and Site Investigation of Waste Area Grouping 2 at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This health and safety plan (HASP) was developed by the members of the Measurement Applications and Development Group of the Health Science Research Division at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). This plan was prepared to ensure that health and safety related items for the Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 2 Remedial Investigation (RI)/Feasibility Study and Site Investigation projects conform with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.120 (April 18, 1992). The RI Plan calls for the characterization, monitoring, risk assessment, and identification of remedial needs and alternatives that have been structured and staged with short-term and long-term objectives. In early FY 1992, the WAG 2 RI was integrated with the ORNL Environmental Restoration (ER) Site Investigations program in order to achieve the complimentary objectives of the projects more effectively by providing an integrated basis of support. The combined effort was named the WAG 2 Remedial Investigation and Site Investigations Program (WAG 2 RI&SI). The Site Investigation activities are a series of monitoring efforts and directed investigations that support other ER activities by providing information about (1) watershed hydrogeology; (2) contaminants, pathways, and fluxes for groundwater at ORNL; (3) shallow subsurface areas that can act as secondary sources of contaminants; and (4) biological populations and contaminants in biota, in addition to other support and coordination activities.

Cofer, G.H.; Holt, V.L.; Roupe, G.W.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

Waste Management Plan for the Remedial Investigation of Waste Area Grouping 10, Operable Unit 3, at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Waste Management Plan (WMP) supplements the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Project WMP and defines the criteria and methods to be used for managing and characterizing waste generated during activities associated with the RI of 23 wells near the Old Hydrofracture Facility (OHF). These wells are within the Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 5 area of contamination (AOC) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Field activities for the limited RI of Operable Unit (OU) 3 of WAG 10 will involve sampling and measurement of various environmental media (e.g., liquids and gases). Many of these activities will occur in areas known to be contaminated with radioactive materials or hazardous chemical substances, and it is anticipated that contaminated solid and liquid wastes and noncontaminated wastes will be generated as a result of these activities. On a project-wide basis, handling of these waste materials will be accomplished in accordance with the RI/FS Project WMP and the procedures referenced throughout the plan.

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

Waste area grouping 2 Phase I task data report: Ecological risk assessment and White Oak Creek watershed screening ecological risk assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents an ecological risk assessment for Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 2 based on the data collected in the Phase I remedial investigation (RI). It serves as an update to the WAG 2 screening ecological risk assessment that was performed using historic data. In addition to identifying potential ecological risks in WAG 2 that may require additional data collection, this report serves to determine whether there are ecological risks of sufficient magnitude to require a removal action or some other expedited remedial process. WAG 2 consists of White Oak Creek (WOC) and its tributaries downstream of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) main plant area, White Oak Lake (WOL), the White Oak Creek Embayment of the Clinch River, associated flood plains, and the associated groundwater. The WOC system drains the WOC watershed, an area of approximately 16.8 km{sup 2} that includes ORNL and associated WAGs. The WOC system has been exposed to contaminants released from ORNL and associated operations since 1943 and continues to receive contaminants from adjacent WAGs.

Efroymson, R.A.; Jackson, B.L.; Jones, D.S. [and others] [and others

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

Groundwater Quality Sampling and Analysis Plan for Environmental Monitoring Waste Area Grouping 6 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Sampling and Analysis Plan addresses groundwater quality sampling and analysis activities that will be conducted in support of the Environmental Monitoring Plan for Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 6. WAG 6 is a shallow-burial land disposal facility for low-level radioactive waste at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, a research facility owned by the US Department of Energy and managed by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. (Energy Systems). Groundwater sampling will be conducted by Energy Systems at 45 wells within WAG 6. The samples will be analyzed for various organic, inorganic, and radiological parameters. The information derived from the groundwater quality monitoring, sampling, and analysis will aid in evaluating relative risk associated with contaminants migrating off-WAG, and also will fulfill Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) interim permit monitoring requirements. The sampling steps described in this plan are consistent with the steps that have previously been followed by Energy Systems when conducting RCRA sampling.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

Genomics:GTL Contractor-Grantee Workshop IV and Metabolic Engineering Working Group Inter-Agency Conference on Metabolic Engineering 2006  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Welcome to the 2006 joint meeting of the fourth Genomics:GTL Contractor-Grantee Workshop and the six Metabolic Engineering Working Group Inter-Agency Conference. The vision and scope of the Genomics:GTL program continue to expand and encompass research and technology issues from diverse scientific disciplines, attracting broad interest and support from researchers at universities, DOE national laboratories, and industry. Metabolic engineering's vision is the targeted and purposeful alteration of metabolic pathways to improve the understanding and use of cellular pathways for chemical transformation, energy transduction, and supramolecular assembly. These two programs have much complementarity in both vision and technological approaches, as reflected in this joint workshop. GLT's challenge to the scientific community remains the further development and use of a broad array of innovative technologies and computational tools to systematically leverage the knowledge and capabilities brought to us by DNA sequencing projects. The goal is to seek a broad and predictive understanding of the functioning and control of complex systems--individual microbes, microbial communities, and plants. GTL's prominent position at the interface of the physical, computational, and biological sciences is both a strength and challenge. Microbes remain GTL's principal biological focus. In the complex 'simplicity' of microbes, they find capabilities needed by DOE and the nation for clean and secure energy, cleanup of environmental contamination, and sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide that contributes to global warming. An ongoing challenge for the entire GTL community is to demonstrate that the fundamental science conducted in each of your research projects brings us a step closer to biology-based solutions for these important national energy and environmental needs.

Mansfield, Betty Kay [ORNL; Martin, Sheryl A [ORNL

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

ISABELLE. Volume 3. Experimental areas, large detectors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This section presents the papers which resulted from work in the Experimental Areas portion of the Workshop. The immediate task of the group was to address three topics. The topics were dictated by the present state of ISABELLE experimental areas construction, the possibility of a phased ISABELLE and trends in physics and detectors.

Not Available

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

Quality Assurance Project Plan for the treatability study of in situ vitrification of Seepage Pit 1 in Waste Area Grouping 7 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP) establishes the quality assurance procedures and requirements to be implemented for the control of quality-related activities for Phase 3 of the Treatability Study (TS) of In Situ Vitrification (ISV) of Seepage Pit 1, ORNL Waste Area Grouping 7. This QAPjP supplements the Quality Assurance Plan for Oak Ridge National Laboratory Environmental Restoration Program by providing information specific to the ISV-TS. Phase 3 of the TS involves the actual ISV melt operations and posttest monitoring of Pit 1 and vicinity. Previously, Phase 1 activities were completed, which involved determining the boundaries of Pit 1, using driven rods and pipes and mapping the distribution of radioactivity using logging tools within the pipes. Phase 2 involved sampling the contents, both liquid and solids, in and around seepage Pit 1 to determine their chemical and radionuclide composition and the spatial distribution of these attributes. A separate QAPjP was developed for each phase of the project. A readiness review of the Phase 3 activities presented QAPjP will be conducted prior to initiating field activities, and an Operational Acceptance, Test (OAT) will also be conducted with no contamination involved. After, the OAT is complete, the ISV process will be restarted, and the melt will be allowed to increase with depth and incorporate the radionuclide contamination at the bottom of Pit 1. Upon completion of melt 1, the equipment will be shut down and mobilized to an adjacent location at which melt 2 will commence.

NONE

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

Groundwater quality monitoring well installation for Lower Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the drilling and installation of 11 groundwater quality monitoring (GQM) wells on the perimeter of Lower Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 2. Lower WAG 2 consists of White Oak Lake and the embayment below White Oak Dam above the Clinch River. The wells in Lower WAG 2 were drilled and developed between December 1989 and September 1990. These wells were installed to characterize and assess the WAG in accordance with applicable Department of Energy, state, and Environmental Protection Agency regulatory requirements. The wells at Lower WAG 2 were drilled with auger or air rotary rigs. Depending on the hydrogeologic conditions present at each proposed well location, one of three basic installation methods was utilized. Detailed procedures for well construction were specified by the Engineering Division to ensure that the wells would provide water samples representative of the aquifer. To ensure conformance with the specifications, Energy Systems Construction Engineering and ERCE provided continuous oversight of field activities. The purpose of the well installation program was to install GQM wells for groundwater characterization at Lower WAG 2. Data packages produced during installation activities by the ERCE hydrogeologists are an important product of the program. These packages document the well drilling, installation, and development activities and provide valuable data for well sampling and WAG characterization. The forms contained in the packages include predrilling and postdrilling checklists, drilling and construction logs, development and hydraulic conductivity records, and quality control-related documents.

Mortimore, J.A.; Lee, T.A.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

474

Group X  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This project is currently under contract for research through the Department of Homeland Security until 2011. The group I was responsible for studying has to remain confidential so as not to affect the current project. All dates, reference links and authors, and other distinguishing characteristics of the original group have been removed from this report. All references to the name of this group or the individual splinter groups has been changed to 'Group X'. I have been collecting texts from a variety of sources intended for the use of recruiting and radicalizing members for Group X splinter groups for the purpose of researching the motivation and intent of leaders of those groups and their influence over the likelihood of group radicalization. This work included visiting many Group X websites to find information on splinter group leaders and finding their statements to new and old members. This proved difficult because the splinter groups of Group X are united in beliefs, but differ in public opinion. They are eager to tear each other down, prove their superiority, and yet remain anonymous. After a few weeks of intense searching, a list of eight recruiting texts and eight radicalizing texts from a variety of Group X leaders were compiled.

Fields, Susannah

2007-08-16T23:59:59.000Z

475

The R/H Sabvabaa—A research hovercraft for marine geophysical work in the most inaccessible area of the Arctic Ocean  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...research hovercraft for marine geophysical work in the...use of a hovercraft for marine geophysical, geological...installed, together with marine and aircraft VHF radios...water-cooled Deutz 440-hp diesel engine. About 40 of the power...

John K. Hall; Yngve Kristoffersen

476

A WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY POSTDOCTORAL POSITION FOR WORK AT LIGO HANFORD, WA Applications are invited for a postdoctoral position in the Gravity Group at the Department of Physics  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY POSTDOCTORAL POSITION FOR WORK AT LIGO HANFORD, WA Applications characterization for the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory (LIGO) at the Hanford site characterization at the LIGO Hanford observatory. Familiarity with data analysis pipelines for searching

Collins, Gary S.

477

Remedial investigation work plan for the Upper East Fork Poplar Creek characterization area, Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, located within the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), is owned by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. The entire ORR was placed on the National Priorities List (NPL) of CERCLA sites in November 1989. Following CERCLA guidelines, sites under investigation require a remedial investigation (RI) to define the nature and extent of contamination, evaluate the risks to public health and the environment, and determine the goals for a feasibility study (FS) of potential remedial actions. The need to complete RIs in a timely manner resulted in the establishment of the Upper East Fork Poplar Creek (UEFPC) Characterization Area (CA) and the Bear Creek CA. The CA approach considers the entire watershed and examines all appropriate media within it. The UEFPC CA, which includes the main Y-12 Plant area, is an operationally and hydrogeologically complex area that contains numerous contaminants and containment sources, as well as ongoing industrial and defense-related activities. The UEFPC CA also is the suspected point of origin for off-site groundwater and surface-water contamination. The UEFPC CA RI also will address a carbon-tetrachloride/chloroform-dominated groundwater plume that extends east of the DOE property line into Union Valley, which appears to be connected with springs in the valley. In addition, surface water in UEFPC to the Lower East Fork Poplar Creek CA boundary will be addressed. Through investigation of the entire watershed as one ``site,`` data gaps and contaminated areas will be identified and prioritized more efficiently than through separate investigations of many discrete units.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

478

Remedial investigation/feasibility study Work Plan and addenda for Operable Unit 4-12: Central Facilities Area Landfills II and III at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is divided into two main sections -- the Work Plan and the addenda. The Work Plan describes the regulatory history and physical setting of Operable Unit 4-12, previous sampling activities, and data. It also identifies a preliminary conceptual model, preliminary remedial action alternatives, and preliminary applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements. In addition, the Work Plan discusses data gaps and data quality objectives for proposed remedial investigation activities. Also included are tasks identified for the remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) and a schedule of RI/FS activities. The addenda include details of the proposed field activities (Field Sampling Plan), anticipated quality assurance activities (Quality Assurance Project Plan), policies and procedures to protect RI/FS workers and the environment during field investigations (Health and Safety Plan), and policies, procedures, and activities that the Department of Energy will use to involve the public in the decision-making process concerning CFA Landfills II and III RI/FS activities (Community Relations Plan).

Keck, K.N.; Stormberg, G.J.; Porro, I.; Sondrup, A.J.; McCormick, S.H.

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

479

Plutonium focus area  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To ensure research and development programs focus on the most pressing environmental restoration and waste management problems at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Environmental Management (EM) established a working group in August 1993 to implement a new approach to research and technology development. As part of this new approach, EM developed a management structure and principles that led to the creation of specific Focus Areas. These organizations were designed to focus the scientific and technical talent throughout DOE and the national scientific community on the major environmental restoration and waste management problems facing DOE. The Focus Area approach provides the framework for intersite cooperation and leveraging of resources on common problems. After the original establishment of five major Focus Areas within the Office of Technology Development (EM-50, now called the Office of Science and Technology), the Nuclear Materials Stabilization Task Group (EM-66) followed the structure already in place in EM-50 and chartered the Plutonium Focus Area (PFA). The following information outlines the scope and mission of the EM, EM-60, and EM-66 organizations as related to the PFA organizational structure.

NONE

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

Design change management in regulation of nuclear fleets: World nuclear association's working groups on Cooperation in Reactor Design Evaluation and Licensing (CORDEL)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 60 year life of a reactor means that a plant will undergo change during its life. To ensure continuing safety, changes must be made with a full understanding of the design intent. With this aim, regulators require that each operating organisation should have a formally designated entity responsible for complete design knowledge in regard to plant safety. INSAG-19 calls such an entity 'Design Authority'. This requirement is difficult to achieve, especially as the number of countries and utilities operating plants increases. Some of these operating organisations will be new, and some will be small. For Gen III plants sold on a turnkey basis, it is even more challenging for the operating company to develop and retain the full knowledge needed for this role. CORDEL's Task Force entitled 'Design Change Management' is investigating options for effective design change management with the aim to support design standardization throughout a fleet's lifetime by means of enhanced international cooperation within industry and regulators. This paper starts with considering the causes of design change and identifies reasons for the increased beneficial involvement of the plant's original vendor in the design change process. A key central theme running through the paper is the definition of responsibilities for design change. Various existing mechanisms of vendor-operator interfaces over design change and how they are managed in different organisational and regulatory environments around the world are considered, with the functionality of Owners Groups and Design Authority being central. The roles played in the design change process by vendors, utilities, regulators, owners' groups and other organisations such as WANO are considered The aerospace industry approach to Design Authority has been assessed to consider what lessons might be learned. (authors)

Swinburn, R. [CORDEL DCM Task Force, Rolls-Royce Plc (United Kingdom); Borysova, I. [CORDEL, WNA, 22a St.James Sq., London SW1Y 4JH (United Kingdom); Waddington, J. [CORDEL Group (United Kingdom); Head, J. G. [CORDEL Group, GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy (United Kingdom); Raidis, Z. [CORDEL Group, Candu Energy (United Kingdom)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "area working group" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Microsoft Word - 2.13 Area Safety Leaders 0913.docx  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Area Safety Leaders Area Safety Leaders Area Safety Leaders coordinate with Supervisors, Managers and Work Leads in Technical Areas to assure that the hazards and required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for the area are identified and communicated to all occupants through the entrance placards. The process for determining PPE requirements and food/beverage restrictions for technical areas is described in ES&H Manual Chapter 19. Further information and templates for entrance placards are found in the LBNL Chemical Hygiene and Safety Plan, under Posting Area Entrances. The Area Safety Leader function is particularly important when users from multiple work groups occupy or use a Technical Area. In most cases, the Area Safety Leader will also be the person designated to

482

Installation restoration program. Feasibility study for site 1, site 3, area of concern a, and area of concern b. Michigan Air National Guard, 110th Fighter Group, Battle Creek, Michigan. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Feasibility Study (FS) Report has been prepared for the Air National Guard Readiness Center (ANORC) under the U.S. Department of Defense`s (DOD) Installation Restoration Program (IRP). The purpose of this FS is to screen and evaluate potential remediation alternatives for IRP sites and areas of concern (AOC) at the Kellogg Memorial Airport in Battle Creek, Michigan that have previously been identified as having contaminated soil and/or groundwater. This FS has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). Montgomery Watson has been contracted to prepare this FS report under contract DAHA90-94-D-0013, Delivery Order 13.

NONE

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

483

April 24, 2012, HSS Focus Group Training Working Group (TWG)...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Johnston (3) Workforce Retention... Mike ArdaizJames RidleyDione Heusel - Workforce Reliability - Succession Planning - Pro-Force Longevity Jim McGeeRandy Lawson...