Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

SC Laboratory Appraisal Process | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

SC Laboratory SC Laboratory Appraisal Process Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2007 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2006 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Planning Process Work for Others in the Office of Science Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Technology Transfer DOE National Laboratories Contact Information Laboratory Policy and Evaluation U.S. Department of Energy SC-32/Forrestal Building

2

FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Appraisal Process FY 2014 Report Cards FY 2013 Report Cards FY 2012 Report Cards Report Card Archives Laboratory Planning Process Laboratory Directed Research and...

3

FY 2007 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Appraisal Process FY 2014 Report Cards FY 2013 Report Cards FY 2012 Report Cards Report Card Archives Laboratory Planning Process Laboratory Directed Research and...

4

FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Appraisal Process FY 2014 Report Cards FY 2013 Report Cards FY 2012 Report Cards Report Card Archives Laboratory Planning Process Laboratory Directed Research and...

5

FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Appraisal Process FY 2014 Report Cards FY 2013 Report Cards FY 2012 Report Cards Report Card Archives Laboratory Planning Process Laboratory Directed Research and...

6

FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

1 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Policy (LP) LP Home About Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 Report Cards FY 2012 Report Cards FY 2011 Report Cards Report...

7

Independent Oversight Appraisal Process Protocols  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OVERSIGHT OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OVERSIGHT INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT PROGRAM APPRAISAL PROCESS PROTOCOLS November 2012 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Independent Oversight Program Appraisal Process Protocols Preface November 2012 i Preface The Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), is responsible for implementing an Independent Oversight Program for safety and security within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in accordance with DOE Orders 227.1, Independent Oversight Program, and 226.1B, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy. Effective oversight, including independent oversight, of DOE Federal and contractor operations is an integral element of the

8

Independent Oversight Appraisal Process Protocols  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OVERSIGHT OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OVERSIGHT INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT PROGRAM APPRAISAL PROCESS PROTOCOLS November 2012 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Independent Oversight Program Appraisal Process Protocols Preface November 2012 i Preface The Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), is responsible for implementing an Independent Oversight Program for safety and security within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in accordance with DOE Orders 227.1, Independent Oversight Program, and 226.1B, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy. Effective oversight, including independent oversight, of DOE Federal and contractor operations is an integral element of the

9

The Appraisal Process: Be Your Own Advocate  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Appraisal Process: Be Your Own Advocate, a presentation of the U.S. Department of Energy's DOE Zero Energy Ready Home program.

10

Protocol, Appraisal Process Guide - April 2008 | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of Independent Oversight Appraisal Process Protocols, which describe the overall philosophy, scope, and general procedures applicable to all Independent Oversight appraisal...

11

Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide - April 2008 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide - April 2008 Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide - April 2008 Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide - April 2008 April 2008 The Safeguards and Security Appraisal Process Guide provides additional planning techniques and a detailed set of tables that describe the necessary steps to successfully conduct each phase of a safeguards and security appraisal activity. Office of Security Evaluations (HS-61) has prepared the Safeguards and Security Appraisal Process Guide, as part of a continuing effort to enhance the quality and consistency of safeguards and security appraisals. This guide should be used along with the Office of Independent Oversight (HS-60) Appraisal Process Protocols that describes the overall philosophy, scope, and general procedures applicable to all Independent Oversight appraisal

12

Office of Emergency Management Oversight Appraisal Process Guide, April 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT APPRAISAL PROCESS GUIDE April 2008 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Emergency Management Oversight Appraisal Process Guide Preface April 2008 i Preface The Office of Independent Oversight (HS-60), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, published the Appraisal Process Protocols to describe the philosophy, scope, and general procedures applicable to all independent oversight appraisal activities. The Office of Emergency Management Oversight (HS-63) prepared this companion volume as part of a continuing effort to enhance the quality and consistency of emergency management oversight appraisals of the Department's comprehensive

13

Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, July 29, 2009 Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, July 29, 2009 This guide is a subordinate document to the Independent Oversight Appraisal Process Protocols. While the protocols provide general guidance common to all appraisal activities, this document provides additional detail and guidance regarding procedures and methods specific to ES&H appraisals conducted by Independent Oversight. DOE Order 470.2B is an important reference document that defines program requirements and, in particular, defines processes for sites to respond to identified vulnerabilities and to develop corrective action plans. The processes described in this guide are used for all ES&H appraisals, including periodic inspections, special

14

Cyber Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide - April 2008 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Cyber Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide - April 2008 Cyber Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide - April 2008 Cyber Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide - April 2008 April 2008 Cyber Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide was developed for the purpose of documenting the appraisal approach and techniques specific to evaluations of classified and unclassified cyber security programs throughout DOE. Office of Cyber Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide provides additional insight into the Office of Cyber Security Evaluations (HS-62) evaluation approach and processes associated with assessing classified and unclassified cyber security programs. The objective of this document is to establish a standard approach and methodology for conducting cyber security reviews that is well understood by all inspection participants.

15

Office of Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, April 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SECURITY EVALUATIONS SECURITY EVALUATIONS APPRAISAL PROCESS GUIDE April 2008 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide Preface April 2008 i Preface The Office of Security Evaluations (HS-61) has prepared the Safeguards and Security Appraisal Process Guide, as part of a continuing effort to enhance the quality and consistency of safeguards and security appraisals. This guide should be used along with the Office of Independent Oversight (HS-60) Appraisal Process Protocols that describes the overall philosophy, scope, and general procedures applicable to all Independent Oversight appraisal activities, as dictated in DOE Orders 470.2B, Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Program, and 226.1, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy. In

16

Appraiser  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This position is located in the Real Property Valuation and Forestry organization. A successful candidate will serve as an Appraiser responsible for the preparation and review of highly complex...

17

Office of Cyber Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, April 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CYBER SECURITY EVALUATIONS CYBER SECURITY EVALUATIONS APPRAISAL PROCESS GUIDE April 2008 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Cyber Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide Preface April 2008 i Preface Department of Energy (DOE) Order 470.2B, Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Program, and Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Standard Operating Procedure, SOP-10-01, Independent Oversight Appraisal Process Protocols, February 2008, provide direction for the Office of Independent Oversight (HS-60) to establish the requirements, responsibilities, and processes for the development and maintenance of Appraisal Process Protocols that describe the activities for evaluating the effectiveness of DOE safeguards and security; cyber security; emergency management; and

18

Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, July 29, 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This guide is a subordinate document to the Independent Oversight Appraisal Process Protocols. While the protocols provide general guidance common to all appraisal activities, this document provides additional detail and guidance regarding procedures and methods specific to ES&H appraisals conducted by Independent Oversight. DOE Order 470.2B is an important reference document that defines program requirements and, in particular, defines processes for sites to respond to identified vulnerabilities and to develop corrective action plans. The processes described in this guide are used for all ES&H appraisals, including periodic inspections, special reviews, targeted nuclear safety inspections, or other appraisal activities, because the reviews differ only in detail.

19

Valuing Green in the Appraisal Process- Building America Top Innovation  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This 2014 Top Innovation describes Building America work to pave the way for a Green and Energy Effiiciency Addendum for real estate appraisers.

20

Valuing Green in the Appraisal Process - Building America Top...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

America Top Innovation Real estate appraisers have historically faced challenges with green and energy efficient homes, both in identifying comparables and in supporting...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, July 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH EVALUATIONS APPRAISAL PROCESS GUIDE July 2009 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide Preface July 2009 i Preface The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), published its Appraisal Process Protocols to describe the philosophy, scope, and general procedures applicable to all Independent Oversight appraisal activities. The Office of Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Evaluations (HS-64) initially prepared this companion guide as part of a continuing effort to enhance the quality and consistency of ES&H oversight appraisals. The

22

FY15 Integrated Training Management Process  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

to LDTS Director and DOE's CLO July 18 Annual Training Plan For FY15 Complete By Send ATP template to TPOCs July 21 ATP completed and edited by organizationsTNA Team...

23

The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A systematic review to identify evaluation studies of appraisals or assessments of plans where health issues were considered from 1987...

Selena Gray; Laurence Carmichael; Hugh Barton; Julie Mytton…

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

24

NGNP Process Heat Applications: Hydrogen Production Accomplishments for FY2010  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes FY10 accomplishments of the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) Engineering Process Heat Applications group in support of hydrogen production technology development. This organization is responsible for systems needed to transfer high temperature heat from a high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) reactor (being developed by the INL NGNP Project) to electric power generation and to potential industrial applications including the production of hydrogen.

Charles V Park

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

FY 2006 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards 6 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2007 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2006 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Ames: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 Argonne: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 BNL: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 Fermilab: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 LBNL: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 ORNL: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 PNNL: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006 PPPL: Oct 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006

26

Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex, May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appraisal of the Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex May 2011 May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 2

27

Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex, May 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Appraisal of the Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex May 2011 May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 2

28

FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards 3 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Ames: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 Argonne: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 BNL: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 Fermilab: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 LBNL: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 ORNL: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 PNNL: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 PPPL: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 SLAC: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 JLab: Oct 1, 2012 - Sept 30, 2013 FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards

29

FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards 2 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Ames: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 Argonne: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 BNL: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 Fermilab: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 LBNL: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 ORNL: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 PNNL: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 PPPL: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 SLAC: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 JLab: Oct 1, 2011 - Sept 30, 2012 FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards

30

FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards 10 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Ames: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 Argonne: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 BNL: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 Fermilab: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 LBNL: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 ORNL: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 PNNL: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 PPPL: October 1, 2009 - September 30, 2010 SLAC: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 JLab: Oct 1, 2009 - Sept 30, 2010 FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards

31

FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards 1 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2012 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2011 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards Ames: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 Argonne: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 BNL: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 Fermilab: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 LBNL: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 ORNL: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 PNNL: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 PPPL: October 1, 2010 - September 30, 2011 SLAC: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 JLab: Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011 FY 2010 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2009 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards FY 2008 SC Laboratory Performance Report Cards

32

Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, July 29, 2009 Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, July 29,...

33

An investigation of the performance feedback process using a self-appraisal  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Problems with Supervisory Feedback. Self-Appraisal and Performance Feedback 16 Disadvantages of the self-appraisal 17 The Interactive Approach. The interactive advantage. 19 20 HYPOTHESES. 22 METHOD. 25 Subjects. Performance Task Design... helpful constructive atmosphere along with high levels of employee participation and mutual goal-setting affected satisfaction with the interview, motivation to improve performance and actual performance improvements. A more detailed investigation...

DeGregorio, Marybeth

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

34

Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies FY 2002 Progress Report II.D Electrolytic Processes  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

% higher than separated PV electrolysis devices, and analysis work has shown that the cost of PEC hydrogenHydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies FY 2002 Progress Report 125 II.D Electrolytic Processes II.D.1 Photoelectrochemical Systems for Hydrogen Production Ken Varner, Scott Warren, J.A. Turner

35

Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex- May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex

36

FY 2009 Progress: Process Monitoring Technology Demonstration at PNNL  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is developing and demonstrating three technologies designed to assist in the monitoring of reprocessing facilities in near-real time. These technologies include 1) a multi-isotope process monitor (MIP), 2) a spectroscopy-based monitor that uses UV-Vis-NIR (ultraviolet-visible-near infrared) and Raman spectrometers, and 3) an electrochemically modulated separations approach (EMS). The MIP monitor uses gamma spectroscopy and pattern recognition software to identify off-normal conditions in process streams. The UV-Vis-NIR and Raman spectroscopic monitoring continuously measures chemical compositions of the process streams including actinide metal ions (uranium, plutonium, neptunium), selected fission products, and major cold flow sheet chemicals. The EMS approach provides an on-line means for separating and concentrating elements of interest out of complex matrices prior to detection via nondestructive assay by gamma spectroscopy or destructive analysis with mass spectrometry. A general overview of the technologies and ongoing demonstration results are described in this report.

Arrigo, Leah M.; Christensen, Ronald N.; Fraga, Carlos G.; Liezers, Martin; Peper, Shane M.; Thomas, Elizabeth M.; Bryan, Samuel A.; Douglas, Matthew; Laspe, Amy R.; Lines, Amanda M.; Peterson, James M.; Ward, Rebecca M.; Casella, Amanda J.; Duckworth, Douglas C.; Levitskaia, Tatiana G.; Orton, Christopher R.; Schwantes, Jon M.

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

Microsoft PowerPoint - NEUP FY2011 R&D Review Processes For Web.pptx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

gy gy y g FY2011 Review Process FY2011 NEUP Review Process FY2011 NEUP Review Process RPA Proposals RPA 3 Pagers: Submission of three page RPA Proposals 3 page P R i RPA 3 Pagers: Submission of three page proposals by university respondents Relevancy Panels: Composed of two Federally selected reviewers representing technical areas Peer Review Panels: Composed of Federally Relevancy Panels Peer Review Panels Peer Review Panels: Composed of Federally selected University or Laboratory technical peers Recommendation Panels: Composed of Federal Directors and their selected advisors SSO Selection: Presentation of Recommendation Panels SSO Selection: Presentation of recommendations by NEUP to the SSO Invited: Proposals selected by the SSO to submit a full proposal N t I it d P l t l t d b th SSO SSO Selection

38

Tanks Focus Area retrieval process development and enhancements FY96 technology development summary report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Retrieval Process Development and Enhancements (RPD&E) activities are part of the Retrieval and Closure Program of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) EM-50 Tanks Focus Area. The purposes of RPD&E are to understand retrieval processes, including emerging and existing technologies, and to gather data on those processes, so that end users have the requisite technical basis to make retrieval decisions. Work has been initiated to support the need for multiple retrieval technologies across the DOE complex. Technologies addressed during FY96 focused on enhancements to sluicing, borehole mining, confined sluicing retrieval end effectors, the lightweight scarifier, and pulsed air mixing. Furthermore, a decision tool and database have been initiated to link retrieval processes with tank closure to assist end users in making retrieval decisions.

Rinker, M.W.; Bamberger, J.A.; Hatchell, B.K. [and others

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

Summary of LLNL`s accomplishments for the FY93 Waste Processing Operations Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Under the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Office of Technology Development (OTD)-Robotic Technology Development Program (RTDP), the Waste Processing Operations (WPO) Program was initiated in FY92 to address the development of automated material handling and automated chemical and physical processing systems for mixed wastes. The Program`s mission was to develop a strategy for the treatment of all DOE mixed, low-level, and transuranic wastes. As part of this mission, DOE`s Mixed Waste Integrated Program (MWIP) was charged with the development of innovative waste treatment technologies to surmount shortcomings of existing baseline systems. Current technology advancements and applications results from cooperation of private industry, educational institutions, and several national laboratories operated for DOE. This summary document presents the LLNL Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (ER and WM) Automation and Robotics Section`s contributions in support of DOE`s FY93 WPO Program. This document further describes the technological developments that were integrated in the 1993 Mixed Waste Operations (MWO) Demonstration held at SRTC in November 1993.

Grasz, E.; Domning, E.; Heggins, D.; Huber, L.; Hurd, R.; Martz, H.; Roberson, P.; Wilhelmsen, K.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

40

The Multi-Isotope Process Monitor Project: FY11 Progress and Accomplishments  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Summary The Multi-Isotope Process (MIP) Monitor represents a potentially new and efficient approach to monitoring process conditions in reprocessing facilities with the high-level goal of aiding in the “...(minimization of) the risks of nuclear proliferation and terrorism” (Office of Technology Assessment 1995). This approach relies on multivariate analysis and gamma spectroscopy of spent fuel product and waste streams to automatically and simultaneously monitor a variety of process conditions (e.g., acid concentrations, burnup, cooling time, etc.) in near real-time (NRT). While the conceptual basis for the MIP Monitor has been shown to be effective in an aqueous reprocessing system, the fundamental approach should also be viable in a pyro-processing recycle system. The MIP Monitor may be calibrated to provide online quantitative information about process variables for process control or domestic safeguards applications; or it can simply monitor, with a built-in information barrier, for off-normal conditions in process streams, making the approach well-suited for applications were it is necessary to respect proprietary information or for international safeguards applications. Proof-of-concept simulations and experiments were performed in previous years demonstrating the validity of this tool in a laboratory setting. This report details follow-on research and development efforts sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCR&D) related to the MIP Monitor for fiscal year 2011 (FY11).

Orton, Christopher R.; Fraga, Carlos G.; Hayes, John W.; Schwantes, Jon M.; Bender, Sarah E.; Unlu, Kenan; Dayman, Kenneth J.; Schreiber, S. S.; Landsberger, Sheldon

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Automated Thermal Image Processing for Detection and Classification of Birds and Bats - FY2012 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Surveying wildlife at risk from offshore wind energy development is difficult and expensive. Infrared video can be used to record birds and bats that pass through the camera view, but it is also time consuming and expensive to review video and determine what was recorded. We proposed to conduct algorithm and software development to identify and to differentiate thermally detected targets of interest that would allow automated processing of thermal image data to enumerate birds, bats, and insects. During FY2012 we developed computer code within MATLAB to identify objects recorded in video and extract attribute information that describes the objects recorded. We tested the efficiency of track identification using observer-based counts of tracks within segments of sample video. We examined object attributes, modeled the effects of random variability on attributes, and produced data smoothing techniques to limit random variation within attribute data. We also began drafting and testing methodology to identify objects recorded on video. We also recorded approximately 10 hours of infrared video of various marine birds, passerine birds, and bats near the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Marine Sciences Laboratory (MSL) at Sequim, Washington. A total of 6 hours of bird video was captured overlooking Sequim Bay over a series of weeks. An additional 2 hours of video of birds was also captured during two weeks overlooking Dungeness Bay within the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Bats and passerine birds (swallows) were also recorded at dusk on the MSL campus during nine evenings. An observer noted the identity of objects viewed through the camera concurrently with recording. These video files will provide the information necessary to produce and test software developed during FY2013. The annotation will also form the basis for creation of a method to reliably identify recorded objects.

Duberstein, Corey A.; Matzner, Shari; Cullinan, Valerie I.; Virden, Daniel J.; Myers, Joshua R.; Maxwell, Adam R.

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

FY13 GLYCOLIC-NITRIC ACID FLOWSHEET DEMONSTRATIONS OF THE DWPF CHEMICAL PROCESS CELL WITH SIMULANTS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Savannah River Remediation is evaluating changes to its current Defense Waste Processing Facility flowsheet to replace formic acid with glycolic acid in order to improve processing cycle times and decrease by approximately 100x the production of hydrogen, a potentially flammable gas. Higher throughput is needed in the Chemical Processing Cell since the installation of the bubblers into the melter has increased melt rate. Due to the significant maintenance required for the safety significant gas chromatographs and the potential for production of flammable quantities of hydrogen, eliminating the use of formic acid is highly desirable. Previous testing at the Savannah River National Laboratory has shown that replacing formic acid with glycolic acid allows the reduction and removal of mercury without significant catalytic hydrogen generation. Five back-to-back Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) cycles and four back-to-back Slurry Mix Evaporator (SME) cycles were successful in demonstrating the viability of the nitric/glycolic acid flowsheet. The testing was completed in FY13 to determine the impact of process heels (approximately 25% of the material is left behind after transfers). In addition, back-to-back experiments might identify longer-term processing problems. The testing was designed to be prototypic by including sludge simulant, Actinide Removal Product simulant, nitric acid, glycolic acid, and Strip Effluent simulant containing Next Generation Solvent in the SRAT processing and SRAT product simulant, decontamination frit slurry, and process frit slurry in the SME processing. A heel was produced in the first cycle and each subsequent cycle utilized the remaining heel from the previous cycle. Lower SRAT purges were utilized due to the low hydrogen generation. Design basis addition rates and boilup rates were used so the processing time was shorter than current processing rates.

Lambert, D.; Zamecnik, J.; Best, D.

2014-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

43

EM-50 Tanks Focus Area retrieval process development and enhancements. FY97 technology development summary report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Retrieval Process Development and Enhancements (RPD and E) activities are part of the US Department of Energy (DOE) EM-50 Tanks Focus Area, Retrieval and Closure program. The purpose of RPD and E is to understand retrieval processes, including emerging and existing technologies, and to gather data on these processes, so that end users have requisite technical bases to make retrieval decisions. Technologies addressed during FY97 include enhancements to sluicing, the use of pulsed air to assist mixing, mixer pumps, innovative mixing techniques, confined sluicing retrieval end effectors, borehole mining, light weight scarification, and testing of Russian-developed retrieval equipment. Furthermore, the Retrieval Analysis Tool was initiated to link retrieval processes with tank waste farms and tank geometric to assist end users by providing a consolidation of data and technical information that can be easily assessed. The main technical accomplishments are summarized under the following headings: Oak Ridge site-gunite and associated tanks treatability study; pulsed air mixing; Oak Ridge site-Old Hydrofracture Facility; hydraulic testbed relocation; cooling coil cleaning end effector; light weight scarifier; innovative tank mixing; advanced design mixer pump; enhanced sluicing; Russian retrieval equipment testing; retrieval data analysis and correlation; simulant development; and retrieval analysis tool (RAT).

Rinker, M.W.; Bamberger, J.A. [Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA (United States); Alberts, D.G. [Waterjet Technology, Inc., Kent, WA (United States)] [and others

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

Evaluation of improved techniques for the removal of fission products from process wastewater and groundwater: FY 1996 status  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes laboratory results acquired in the course of evaluating new sorbents for the treatment of radiologically contaminated groundwater and process wastewater. During FY 1996, the evaluation of resorcinol-formaldehyde (R-F) resin for the removal of cesium and strontium from wastewaters was completed. Additionally, strontium sorption on sodium nonatitanate powder was characterized in a series of multicomponent batch studies. Both of these materials were evaluated in reference to a baseline sorbent, natural chabazite zeolite.

Bostick, D.T. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Guo, B. [Oak Ridge Research Inst., TN (United States)

1997-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

45

The Multi-Isotope Process (MIP) Monitor Project: FY12 Progress and Accomplishments  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Multi-Isotope Process (MIP) Monitor, being developed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), provides an efficient approach to monitoring the process conditions in reprocessing facilities in support of the goal of "...(minimization of) the risks of nuclear proliferation and terrorism." The MIP Monitor measures distributions of a suite of indicator (radioactive) isotopes present within product and waste streams of a nuclear reprocessing facility. These indicator isotopes are monitored on-line by gamma spectrometry and compared, in near-real-time, to spectral patterns representing "normal" process conditions using multivariate pattern recognition software. The monitor utilizes this multivariate analysis and gamma spectroscopy of reprocessing streams to detect small changes in the gamma spectrum, which may indicate changes in process conditions. Multivariate analysis methods common in chemometrics, such as principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares regression (PLS), act as pattern recognition techniques, which can detect small deviations from the expected, nominal condition. By targeting multiple gamma-emitting indicator isotopes, the MIP Monitor approach is compatible with the use of small, portable, relatively high-resolution gamma detectors that may be easily deployed throughout an existing facility. The automated multivariate analysis can provide a level of data obscurity, giving a built-in information barrier to protect sensitive or proprietary operational data. Proof-of-concept simulations and experiments have been performed in previous years to demonstrate the validity of this tool in a laboratory setting. Development of the MIP Monitor approach continues to evaluate the efficacy of the monitor for automated, real-time or near-real-time application. This report details follow-on research and development efforts sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cycle Research and Development related to the MIP Monitor for fiscal year 2012 (FY12).

Coble, Jamie B.; Orton, Christopher R.; Jordan, David V.; Schwantes, Jon M.; Bender, Sarah; Dayman, Kenneth J.; Unlu, Kenan; Landsberger, Sheldon

2012-09-27T23:59:59.000Z

46

Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 May 2013 Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), conducted an appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) Preliminary Safety Design Report (PSDR) and associated site office review processes. This appraisal focused on selected aspects of the PSDR submitted to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Production Office (NPO) for review

47

Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 May 2013 Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), conducted an appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) Preliminary Safety Design Report (PSDR) and associated site office review processes. This appraisal focused on selected aspects of the PSDR submitted to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Production Office (NPO) for review

48

Tanks focus area multiyear program plan - FY96-FY98  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Tanks Focus Area (TFA) Multiyear Program Plan (MYPP) presents the recommended TFA technical program. The recommendation covers a 3-year funding outlook (FY96-FY98), with an emphasis on FY96 and FY97. In addition to defining the recommended program, this document also describes the processes used to develop the program, the implementation strategy for the program, the references used to write this report, data on the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) tank site baselines, details on baseline assumptions and the technical elements, and a glossary.

NONE

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

49

Project Management Guide for DOE appraisals  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This guide defines a process to provide exemplary support to a DOE assessment team and highlights ``lessons learned`` from the first TSA of the Kansas City Plant which was performed April 21--April 30, 1992. DOE currently plans to conduct TSAs annually at the KCD. This guide can be used to prepare for future Tiger Team Reviews, TSAS, or ES&H Progress Assessments. The guide will be modified periodically to reflect improvements in the appraisal management process as the DOE appraisal process evolves. The process, or portions thereof, described in this manual is expected to be applicable to managing a Conduct of Operations Assessment.

Bendure, A.O. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Bowers, J.L.; Daniel, V.R.; Renfrow, R.M. [Allied-Signal Aerospace Co., Kansas City, MO (United States). Kansas City Div.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

50

Project Management Guide for DOE appraisals  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This guide defines a process to provide exemplary support to a DOE assessment team and highlights lessons learned'' from the first TSA of the Kansas City Plant which was performed April 21--April 30, 1992. DOE currently plans to conduct TSAs annually at the KCD. This guide can be used to prepare for future Tiger Team Reviews, TSAS, or ES H Progress Assessments. The guide will be modified periodically to reflect improvements in the appraisal management process as the DOE appraisal process evolves. The process, or portions thereof, described in this manual is expected to be applicable to managing a Conduct of Operations Assessment.

Bendure, A.O. (Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States)); Bowers, J.L.; Daniel, V.R.; Renfrow, R.M. (Allied-Signal Aerospace Co., Kansas City, MO (United States). Kansas City Div.)

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

EM Five-Year Plan (FY 2008 - FY 2012) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM Five-Year Plan (FY 2008 - FY 2012) EM Five-Year Plan (FY 2008 - FY 2012) EM Five-Year Plan (FY 2008 - FY 2012) The purpose of the EM Five Year Plan is to describe EM's planned strategies, funding and accomplishments over the next five years. This plan summarizes EM progress to date, presents EM performance measures, discusses assumptions and the EM decision-making process, and provides estimated EM funding over the FY 2008-2012 time period. Following this summary are sections that provide detailed information on each site including planned accomplishments at the target funding scenario. EM's five year planning targets are significantly different from the funding targets that appeared in the FY 2007-2011 Five Year Plan. Site planning allocations that formed the basis for the planned accomplishments

52

Evaluation of improved techniques for the removal of fission products from process wastewater and groundwater: FY 1997 status  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary goals of this effort in FY 1997 were to survey local end users of wastewater treatment technology and then to evaluate recently available treatment processes in light of user needs. Survey results indicate that local sites are confronted with a limited, and shrinking, budget for treating aqueous waste streams. Therefore, a process will be selected primarily on the basis of sorbent costs, use of existing equipment, and disposal costs for spent processing materials. Current laboratory testing and economic studies have been directed toward addressing the technical issues specific to the removal of {sup 90}Sr and {sup 137}Cs from groundwater and process wastewater. This year`s efforts have concentrated on evaluating the engineered form of crystalline silicotitanates (CSTs) for near neutral pH applications. Both powder and pellet forms of CST can be obtained through UOP; this task evaluated only the engineered form of the sorbent for wastewater remediation. Preliminary experimental efforts included measuring the average particle size, surface water content, total sodium content, ion exchange capacity, and equilibration mixing time. The as received material contains approximately 10% fines, which adhere to the CST pellet. The cesium and strontium ion-exchange capacities, based on multiple contacts with 50 ppm of the metal, are 0.8 meq/g and 1.1 meq/g, respectively. Batch tests indicated that an equilibrium mixing time of 100 h was required for cesium sorption. Group 2 cations (Sr, Ca, and Mg) required greater than 500 h. Particle diffusion coefficients were estimated for each of these cations from the batch studies.

Bostick, D.T.; DePaoli, S.M.; Guo, B.

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

Chapter 6 - Investment Appraisal  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract This chapter describes the investment appraisal, which is part of the business case. It includes the calculations for return on investment (ROI) and net present value (NPV) using the discounted cash flow (DCF) method. Also discussed are payback, internal rate of return (IRR), and cost/benefit analysis. The chapter contains a discount factor table and worked examples.

Albert Lester

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

54

Metals Processing Laboratory Users (MPLUS) Facility Annual Report FY 2002 (October 1, 2001-September 30, 2002)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Metals Processing Laboratory Users Facility (MPLUS) is a Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Industrial Technologies Program, user facility designated to assist researchers in key industries, universities, and federal laboratories in improving energy efficiency, improving environmental aspects, and increasing competitiveness. The goal of MPLUS is to provide access to the specialized technical expertise and equipment needed to solve metals processing issues that limit the development and implementation of emerging metals processing technologies. The scope of work can also extend to other types of materials. MPLUS has four primary user centers: (1) Processing--casting, powder metallurgy, deformation processing (including extrusion, forging, rolling), melting, thermomechanical processing, and high-density infrared processing; (2) Joining--welding, monitoring and control, solidification, brazing, and bonding; (3) Characterization--corrosion, mechanical properties, fracture mechanics, microstructure, nondestructive examination, computer-controlled dilatometry, and emissivity; and (4) Materials/Process Modeling--mathematical design and analyses, high-performance computing, process modeling, solidification/deformation, microstructure evolution, thermodynamic and kinetic, and materials databases A fully integrated approach provides researchers with unique opportunities to address technologically related issues to solve metals processing problems and probe new technologies. Access is also available to 16 additional Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) user facilities ranging from state-of-the-art materials characterization capabilities, and high-performance computing to manufacturing technologies. MPLUS can be accessed through a standardized user-submitted proposal and a user agreement. Nonproprietary (open) or proprietary proposals can be submitted. For open research and development, access to capabilities is provided free of charge, while for proprietary efforts, the user pays the entire project costs based on DOE guidelines for ORNL costs.

Angelini, P

2004-04-27T23:59:59.000Z

55

FY 2007 Congressional Request  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007 Request Laboratory Table 70 Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale...

56

Oak Ridge National Laboratory | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Laboratory Policy (LP) LP Home About Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2014 Report Cards FY 2013 Report Cards FY 2012 Report Cards Report Card Archives...

57

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Facility Laboratory Policy (LP) LP Home About Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2014 Report Cards FY 2013 Report Cards FY 2012 Report Cards Report Card Archives Laboratory...

58

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory | U.S. DOE Office of Science...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Laboratory Policy (LP) LP Home About Laboratory Appraisal Process FY 2013 Report Cards FY 2012 Report Cards FY 2011 Report Cards Report Card...

59

The Multi-Isotope Process (MIP) Monitor Project: FY13 Final Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Multi-Isotope Process (MIP) Monitor provides an efficient approach to monitoring the process conditions in reprocessing facilities in support of the goal of “… (minimization of) the risks of nuclear proliferation and terrorism.” The MIP Monitor measures the distribution of the radioactive isotopes in product and waste streams of a nuclear reprocessing facility. These isotopes are monitored online by gamma spectrometry and compared, in near-real-time, to spectral patterns representing “normal” process conditions using multivariate analysis and pattern recognition algorithms. The combination of multivariate analysis and gamma spectroscopy allows us to detect small changes in the gamma spectrum, which may indicate changes in process conditions. By targeting multiple gamma-emitting indicator isotopes, the MIP Monitor approach is compatible with the use of small, portable, relatively high-resolution gamma detectors that may be easily deployed throughout an existing facility. The automated multivariate analysis can provide a level of data obscurity, giving a built-in information barrier to protect sensitive or proprietary operational data. Proof-of-concept simulations and experiments have been performed in previous years to demonstrate the validity of this tool in a laboratory setting for systems representing aqueous reprocessing facilities. However, pyroprocessing is emerging as an alternative to aqueous reprocessing techniques.

Meier, David E.; Coble, Jamie B.; Jordan, David V.; Mcdonald, Luther W.; Forrester, Joel B.; Schwantes, Jon M.; Unlu, Kenan; Landsberger, Sheldon; Bender, Sarah; Dayman, Kenneth J.; Reilly, Dallas D.

2013-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

60

Retrieval process development and enhancements FY96 pulsed-air mixer testing and deployment study  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Millions of gallons of radioactive wastes resides in underground tanks at US Department of Energy sites. The waste was generated primarily by the processing of nuclear fuel elements to remove fissile radionuclides for use in atomic weapons. Plans call for the waste to be removed from the tanks and processed to create immobile waste forms, which will be stored to prevent release to the environment. The consistency of the waste ranges from liquid, to slurry, to sticky sludge, to hard saltcake. a variety of waste- retrieval and processing methods are being evaluated and implemented. One such method is pulsed-air mixing, which is the subject of this report. Pulsed-air mixing equipment has been successfully applied to a number of difficult mixing applications in various chemical-process industries. Most previous applications involved the mixing of particle-free viscous fluids. The study described in this report was preformed to improve the understanding of how pulsed-air mixing applies to slurries. This document describes work conducted to evaluate the potential application of pulsed-air mixers to the slurry- mixing needs of the US Department of Energy`s waste-retrieval programs.

Powell, M.R.; Hymas, C.R.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Tanks Focus Area Site Needs Assessment FY 2000  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document summarizes the Tanks Focus Area (TFA's) process of collecting, analyzing, and responding to high-level radioactive tank waste science and technology needs developed from across the DOE complex in FY 2000. The document also summarizes each science and technology need, and provides an initial prioritization of TFA's projected work scope for FY 2001 and FY 2002.

Allen, Robert W.

2000-03-10T23:59:59.000Z

62

FY 2015 Budget Request Webinar  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

based on actual integrated biorefinery project plant performance data. eere.energy.gov 19 Bioenergy Technologies - FY 2015 Budget Request (Dollars in Thousands) FY 2013 Current FY...

63

SUMMARY OF FY11 SULFATE RETENTION STUDIES FOR DEFENSE WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY GLASS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the results of studies related to the incorporation of sulfate in high level waste (HLW) borosilicate glass produced at the Savannah River Site (SRS) Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). A group of simulated HLW glasses produced for earlier sulfate retention studies was selected for full chemical composition measurements to determine whether there is any clear link between composition and sulfate retention over the compositional region evaluated. In addition, the viscosity of several glasses was measured to support future efforts in modeling sulfate solubility as a function of predicted viscosity. The intent of these studies was to develop a better understanding of sulfate retention in borosilicate HLW glass to allow for higher loadings of sulfate containing waste. Based on the results of these and other studies, the ability to improve sulfate solubility in DWPF borosilicate glasses lies in reducing the connectivity of the glass network structure. This can be achieved, as an example, by increasing the concentration of alkali species in the glass. However, this must be balanced with other effects of reduced network connectivity, such as reduced viscosity, potentially lower chemical durability, and in the case of higher sodium and aluminum concentrations, the propensity for nepheline crystallization. Future DWPF processing is likely to target higher waste loadings and higher sludge sodium concentrations, meaning that alkali concentrations in the glass will already be relatively high. It is therefore unlikely that there will be the ability to target significantly higher total alkali concentrations in the glass solely to support increased sulfate solubility without the increased alkali concentration causing failure of other Product Composition Control System (PCCS) constraints, such as low viscosity and durability. No individual components were found to provide a significant improvement in sulfate retention (i.e., an increase of the magnitude necessary to have a dramatic impact on blending, washing, or waste loading strategies for DWPF) for the glasses studied here. In general, the concentrations of those species that significantly improve sulfate solubility in a borosilicate glass must be added in relatively large concentrations (e.g., 13 to 38 wt % or more of the frit) in order to have a substantial impact. For DWPF, these concentrations would constitute too large of a portion of the frit to be practical. Therefore, it is unlikely that specific additives may be introduced into the DWPF glass via the frit to significantly improve sulfate solubility. The results presented here continue to show that sulfate solubility or retention is a function of individual glass compositions, rather than a property of a broad glass composition region. It would therefore be inappropriate to set a single sulfate concentration limit for a range of DWPF glass compositions. Sulfate concentration limits should continue to be identified and implemented for each sludge batch. The current PCCS limit is 0.4 wt % SO{sub 4}{sup 2-} in glass, although frit development efforts have led to an increased limit of 0.6 wt % for recent sludge batches. Slightly higher limits (perhaps 0.7-0.8 wt %) may be possible for future sludge batches. An opportunity for allowing a higher sulfate concentration limit at DWPF may lay lie in improving the laboratory experiments used to set this limit. That is, there are several differences between the crucible-scale testing currently used to define a limit for DWPF operation and the actual conditions within the DWPF melter. In particular, no allowance is currently made for sulfur partitioning (volatility versus retention) during melter processing as the sulfate limit is set for a specific sludge batch. A better understanding of the partitioning of sulfur in a bubbled melter operating with a cold cap as well as the impacts of sulfur on the off-gas system may allow a higher sulfate concentration limit to be established for the melter feed. This approach would have to be taken carefully to ensure that a

Fox, K.; Edwards, T.

2012-05-08T23:59:59.000Z

64

Institutional Plan FY 2003 - 2007  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Disclaimer Disclaimer While this document is believed to contain correct information, the United States Government nor any agency thereof makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that it would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. INSTITUTIONAL PLAN FY 2003 - 2007 INSTITUTIONAL PLAN FY 2003 - 2007 1 Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction

65

FY 2007 Secretary Rollout  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget Budget DOE: Energy, Science, and Security February 6, 2006 1 Guiding Principles * Advancing our National Security * Reducing Dependence on Foreign Oil * Increasing Economic Competitiveness through Scientific Discovery * Honoring our Commitments * Managing for Excellence Supporting our Nation's Highest Priorities 2 DOE Budget : FY 2006 and FY 2007 ($ in Billions) National Security $9.1 Energy and Environm ent $9.9 Science $3.6 Corporate M anagem ent $1.0 FY 2006 Appropriation $23.6 Billion FY 2007 Request $23.6 Billion FY 2007 request is level with FY 2006 In real terms, $0.5 billion below FY 2006 National Se curity $9.3 Ene rgy and Environm e nt $9.2 Science $4.1 Corporate M anage m ent $1.0 3 FY 2007 DOE Budget Breakout By Organization ($ in Millions) -$3 $983 $986 $1,002 Corporate Management/FERC

66

FY 2014 LDRD Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The total FY 2014 LDRD Program cost at the national laboratories was $527 million in 1,662 projects.

67

Learning by appraising: an emotion-based approach to intrinsic reward design  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In this paper, we investigate the use of emotional information in the learning process of autonomous agents. Inspired by four dimensions that are commonly postulated by appraisal theories of emotions, we construct a set of reward features to guide the ... Keywords: Reinforcement learning, appraisal theories of emotions, intrinsic motivation, optimal reward problem, reward design

Pedro Sequeira, Francisco S Melo, Ana Paiva

2014-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

68

FY 2008 Secretary Rollout  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget Budget Investing in Science and Energy Security February 5, 2007 1 The Focus * Investing in World-Class Science * Advancing Energy Security * Reducing Dependence on Foreign Sources of Energy * Promoting the Use of Clean Energy * Honoring our Commitments Supporting our Nation's Highest Priorities 2 DOE Budget : FY 2007 and FY 2008 ($ in Billions) National Security $9.3 Corporate Management $1.0 Science $4.1 Energy and Environment $9.2 FY 2007 Request $23.6 Billion FY 2008 Request $24.3 Billion FY 2008 request is $705 million above the FY 2007 request level. Energy and Environment $9.4 Science $4.4 National Security $9.4 Corporate Management $1.1 3 FY 2008 DOE Budget Breakout By Organization ($ in Millions) +$61 $1,041 $980 $967 Corporate Management/FERC +$705 $24,259 $23,554 $23,572 Total DOE

69

FY 2008 Control Table by Organization  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Congressional Approp. Request Request % FY 2008 vs. FY 2007 Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Production operations......

70

FY 2014 Metric Summary | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

4 Metric Summary FY 2014 Metric Summary FY 2014 Q1 Metric Summary.pdf FY 2014 Q2 Metric Summary.pdf FY 2014 Q3 Metric Summary.pdf More Documents & Publications FY 2014 Q3 Metric...

71

FY 2013 Budget Highlights  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Budget Highlights g g g February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0077 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Budget Highlights g g g February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Table of Contents LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FY 2013 PROGRAM OFFICE HIGHLIGHTS............................................................................................................ 9

72

FY 2012 Volume 4  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Volume 4 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Science Science February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 DOE/CF-0060 Volume 4 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Science Science February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Science FY 2012 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .............................................................................................................3 Appropriation Language ...........................................................................................................................5 Overview ...................................................................................................................................................7

73

FY 2011 Volume 4  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 DOE/CF-0050 Volume 4 Science Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request February 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 DOE/CF-0050 Volume 4 Science Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request Department of Energy/ Science FY 2011 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3 Appropriation Language ...........................................................................................................................5 Overview...................................................................................................................................................7

74

FY 2013 Volume 5  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 DOE/CF-0075 Volume 5 Environmental Management Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-0075 Volume 5 Environmental Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management Page 1 FY 2013 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Appropriation Language .......................................................................................................................................................... 5

75

FY 2011 Volume 5  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 DOE/CF-0051 Volume 5 Environmental Management Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request February 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-0051 Volume 5 Environmental Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request Department of Energy/ Environmental Management FY 2011 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3 Appropriation Language ...........................................................................................................................5 Overview...................................................................................................................................................7

76

FY 2012 Budget Highlights  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Budget Highlights g g g February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0064 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Budget Highlights g g g February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FY 2012 PROGRAM OFFICE HIGHLIGHTS .......................................................................................................... 7 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION .......................................................................................................................... 15

77

FY 2012 LDRD Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The total FY 2012 LDRD Program cost at the national laboratories was $578.9 million in 1,738 projects.

78

FY 2013 LDRD Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The total FY 2013 LDRD Program cost at the national laboratories was $568.6 million in 1,742 projects.

79

FY 2008 Budget Highlights  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

requests, the FY 2008 budget request continues to shift resources away from oil and gas research and development programs, which have sufficient market incentives for private...

80

Optimising the reward of appraisal drilling  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Management of the uncertainties associated with the development of a hydrocarbon resource is essential to minimize economic risk. In many instances these uncertainties can only be reduced by appraisal drilling. This presentation illustrates the efforts being made to manage uncertainty by determining its impact on overall project profitability. The Value of Information (VOI) approach is described. VOI aims at quantifying the benefits of appraisal by determining its economic reward in terms of its contribution to a development plan which is economically robust over the uncertainty range. Appraisal drilling costs can be reduced by combining appraisal and development objectives in one well. The growing use of horizontal drilling technology has resulted in novel approaches to appraisal. As examples, in the Osprey and Brent Fields (UK North Sea) wells were designed to satisfy both appraisal and development objectives. In Osprey, a well was drilled from a central production platform to provide water injection support in a satellite structure while at the same time appraising the saddle area between the two structures. In Brent, horizontal wells are used to appraise and develop the so called slump blocks, characterized by being highly faulted and compartmentalized. Another increasingly common application of horizontal wells is for the flank appraisal of hydrocarbon bearing structure. Examples from the Rabi Field (Gabon) and Batan Field (Nigeria) show how appraisal was achieved by extending the reach of horizontal development wells from the central core of the structures.

Gdula, J.

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Optimising the reward of appraisal drilling  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Management of the uncertainties associated with the development of a hydrocarbon resource is essential to minimize economic risk. In many instances these uncertainties can only be reduced by appraisal drilling. This presentation illustrates the efforts being made to manage uncertainty by determining its impact on overall project profitability. The Value of Information (VOI) approach is described. VOI aims at quantifying the benefits of appraisal by determining its economic reward in terms of its contribution to a development plan which is economically robust over the uncertainty range. Appraisal drilling costs can be reduced by combining appraisal and development objectives in one well. The growing use of horizontal drilling technology has resulted in novel approaches to appraisal. As examples, in the Osprey and Brent Fields (UK North Sea) wells were designed to satisfy both appraisal and development objectives. In Osprey, a well was drilled from a central production platform to provide water injection support in a satellite structure while at the same time appraising the saddle area between the two structures. In Brent, horizontal wells are used to appraise and develop the so called slump blocks, characterized by being highly faulted and compartmentalized. Another increasingly common application of horizontal wells is for the flank appraisal of hydrocarbon bearing structure. Examples from the Rabi Field (Gabon) and Batan Field (Nigeria) show how appraisal was achieved by extending the reach of horizontal development wells from the central core of the structures.

Gdula, J.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

82

FY 2012 Volume 5  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Volume 5 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Environmental Management FY 2011 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .............................................................................................................3

83

FY 2010 Volume 4  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 DOE/CF-038 Volume 4 Science May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 4 DOE/CF-038 Volume 4 Science Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Science FY 2010 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3 Appropriation Language ...........................................................................................................................5 Overview...................................................................................................................................................7 Funding by Site .......................................................................................................................................21

84

FY 2011 Budget Highlights  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/CF-0046 Budget Highlights Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request February 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0046 Budget Highlights Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS........................................................................................................................ 5 BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION .............................................................................................................. 13 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................

85

FY 2012 Volume 7  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 Volume 7 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Nuclear Energy D f N l W t Di l Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Nuclear Waste Disposal February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 7 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Volume 7 FY 2012 Congressional Budget Volume 7 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary ........................................................................................................... 3

86

Fossil Energy FY 2009 Budget  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Fossil Energy's FY 2009 budget, including request, House and Senate marks, and Omnibus appropriation.

87

FY 2006 Statistical Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply Operation and maintenance................................................. 787,941 909,903 862,499 -47,404 -5.2% Construction......................................................................... 6,956 22,416 40,175 17,759 +79.2% Total, Energy supply................................................................ 794,897 932,319 902,674 -29,645 -3.2% Non-Defense site acceleration completion............................. 167,272 157,316 172,400 15,084 +9.6%

88

FY 2009 State Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

State Tables State Tables Preliminary February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request State Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper State Index Page Number FY 2009 Congressional Budget 1/30/2008 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 9:01:45AM Page 1 of 2 FY 2007 Appropriation FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009 Request State Table 1 1 $27,588

89

FY 2007 Laboratory Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Laboratory tables Laboratory tables preliminary Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of Chief Financial Officer Laboratory tables preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2007 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 12:10:40PM Department Of Energy 1/31/2006 Page Number FY 2005 Appropriation FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007

90

FY 2010 State Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

State Tables State Tables Preliminary May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request State Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper State Index Page Number FY 2010 Congressional Budget 5/4/2009 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 2:13:22PM Page 1 of 2 FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009 Appropriation FY 2010 Request State Table 1 1 $46,946 $48,781 $38,844 Alabama 2 $6,569

91

FY 2008 Laboratory Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Laboratory Table Laboratory Table Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Laboratory Table Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2008 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 6:51:02AM Department Of Energy 2/1/2007 Page Number FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007 Request FY 2008 Request

92

FY 2006 State Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

State Tables State Tables Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2005 State Tables Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. State Index Page Number FY 2006 Congressional Budget 1/27/2005 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 3:32:58PM Page 1 of 2 FY 2004 Comp/Approp FY 2005 Comp/Approp FY 2006 Request State Table

93

FY 2010 Laboratory Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Preliminary May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2010 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 2:08:56PM Department Of Energy 5/4/2009 Page Number FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009 Appropriation FY 2010 Request Laboratory Table 1 1 $1,200

94

Fy 2009 Laboratory Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Preliminary February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2009 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 8:59:25AM Department Of Energy 1/30/2008 Page Number FY 2007 Appropriation FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009

95

FY 2008 State Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

State Table State Table Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer State Table Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. State Index Page Number FY 2008 Congressional Budget 2/1/2007 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 6:53:08AM Page 1 of 2 FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007 Request FY 2008 Request State Table 1 1 $28,332 $30,341

96

Microsoft Word - No Fear Stats FY04.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

No Fear Act Report FY 2004 EEO Year End Data October 1, 2003 through September 30, 2004 I. Complaint Activity: 29 CFR §1614.704(a) - (c) Number/Totals Complaints Filed in FY: 1614.704(a) 81 Individual Filers (Complainants): 1614.704(b) 74 Repeat Filers: 1614.704(c) 3 II. Complaints by Basis: 29 CFR §1614.704(d) Basis Number/Totals Age 31 Color 5 Disability 5 National Origin 16 Race 37 Religion 2 Reprisal 30 Sex (Includes Complaints Filed Under Equal Pay Act) 25 Other 0 III. Complaints by Issue: 29 CFR §1614.704(e) Issue Number/Totals Appointment/Hire 15 Assignment of Duties 13 Awards 2 Conversion to Full-Time 0 Disciplinary Actions -- -- Demotion 1 Reprimand 0 Suspension 0 Removal 0 Other 0 Duty Hours 0 Evaluation/Appraisal 3 Examination/Test 0

97

FY 2005 Laboratory Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Congressional Budget Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 Laboratory Tables Preliminary Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Preliminary Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropria ted as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress.

98

FY 2013 Volume 4  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 DOE/CF-0074 Volume 4 Science Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 DOE/CF-0074 Volume 4 Science Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Science Advanced Research Projects Agency- Energy Science Advanced Research Projects Agency- Energy Department of Energy/Science/ Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 3

99

FY 2011 Volume 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 DOE/CF-0047 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request February 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-0047 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2011 Congressional Budget

100

FY 2013 Statistical Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Current Enacted Congressional Approp. Approp. * Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy........................................ 1,771,721 1,809,638 2,337,000 +527,362 +29.1% Electricity delivery and energy reliability......................................... 138,170 139,103 143,015 +3,912 +2.8% Nuclear energy................................................................................ 717,817 765,391 770,445 +5,054 +0.7% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology.................................................................. -16,500 -- --

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

FY 2009 Statistical Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Current Current Congressional Op. Plan Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy.......................... -- 1,722,407 1,255,393 -467,014 -27.1% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................... -- 138,556 134,000 -4,556 -3.3% Nuclear energy................................................................. -- 961,665 853,644 -108,021 -11.2% Legacy management........................................................ -- 33,872 -- -33,872 -100.0% Energy supply and conservation Operation and maintenance..........................................

102

FY 2013 Volume I  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 DOE/CF-0071 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-0071 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration Page 1 FY 2013 Congressional Budget

103

Local Energy Alliance Program Adds Green Appraisal Capabilities...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Local Energy Alliance Program Adds Green Appraisal Capabilities to its Energy Efficiency Services Local Energy Alliance Program Adds Green Appraisal Capabilities to its Energy...

104

FY 2011 State Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

State Tables State Tables Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0054 March 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer State Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0054 State Index Page Number FY 2011 Congressional Budget 1/29/2010 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 6:34:40AM Page 1 of 2 FY 2009 Appropriation

105

FY 2010 Statistical Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2010 Current Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Recovery Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy....................................... 1,704,112 2,178,540 16,800,000 2,318,602 +140,062 +6.4% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................................ 136,170 137,000 4,500,000 208,008 +71,008 +51.8% Nuclear energy.............................................................................. 960,903 792,000 -- 761,274 -30,726 -3.9% Legacy management..................................................................... 33,872 -- -- --

106

FY 2012 Statistical Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2Statistical Table by Appropriation 2Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 Current Congressional Annualized Congressional Approp. Request CR Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy....................................... 2,216,392 2,355,473 2,242,500 3,200,053 +983,661 +44.4% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................................ 168,484 185,930 171,982 237,717 +69,233 +41.1% Nuclear energy............................................................................. 774,578 824,052 786,637 754,028 -20,550 -2.7% Fossil energy programs Fossil energy research and development................................... 659,770 586,583 672,383 452,975

107

FY 2006 Laboratory Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2005 Laboratory Tables Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2006 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 3:43:16PM Department Of Energy 1/27/2005 Page Number FY 2004 Comp/Approp FY 2005 Comp/Approp

108

FY 2007 Volume 5  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 DOE/CF-006 Volume 5 Environmental management Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-006 Volume 5 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Environmental management Department of Energy/ Environmental Management FY 2007 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .........................................................................................................3 Overview................................................................................................................................................5 Defense Environmental Cleanup Appropriation Cleanup .................................................................107 Carlsbad

109

FY 2009 Volume 4  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 DOE/CF-027 Volume 4 Science February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 4 DOE/CF-027 Volume 4 Science Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Science FY 2009 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3 Appropriation Language ...........................................................................................................................5 Overview...................................................................................................................................................7 Funding by Site

110

FY 2008 Volume 5  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 DOE/CF-018 Volume 5 Environmental Management Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-018 Volume 5 Environmental Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Environmental Management FY 2008 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3 Strategic Overview....................................................................................................................................5 Overview...................................................................................................................................................7

111

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Year Site Plan FY 2007...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Year Site Plan FY 2007 - FY 2018 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Year Site Plan FY 2007 - FY 2018 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10...

112

EERE FY 2016 Budget Request  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

EERE FY 2016 Budget Request, from the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

113

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan Subject: Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG's FY 2009 actual performance and FY 2010 planned activities. Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan More Documents & Publications U.S. Departmetn of Energy, Office of Inspector General, Annaul Peformance Report FY 2009, Annual Performance Plan Fy 2010 Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Annual Performance Results and FY 2012

114

Process Intensification of Hydrogen Unit Operations Using an Electrochemical Device - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Glenn Eisman (Primary Contact), Dylan Share, Chuck Carlstrom H2Pump LLC 11 Northway Lane North Latham, NY 12110 Phone: (518) 783-2241 Email: glenn.eisman@h2pumpllc.com DOE Manager HQ: Richard Farmer Phone: (202) 586-1623 Email: Richard.Farmer@ee.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-SC0002185 Subcontractor: PBI Performance Products, Inc., Rock Hill, SC Project Start Date: Phase II: August 15, 2010 Project End Date: August 15, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop and demonstrate a multi-functional hydrogen production technology based on a polybenzimidazole (PBI) membrane which exhibits: High efficiency (70%) * Up to 100 scfh pumping capability * CO * 2 and CO tolerance

115

FY 2013 Laboratory Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables y Preliminary February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0078 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables P li i Preliminary h b d i d i hi d h l l f b d h i f h The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2013 Congressional Budget

116

FY 2011 Laboratory Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0055 March 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer Laboratory Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0055 Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2011 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 6:24:57AM Department Of Energy 1/29/2010 Page

117

FY 2013 Volume 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Volume 2 f Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional B d R Budget Request Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital F nd Working Capital Fund Safeguards and Security Crosscut Pensions February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 DOE/CF-0072 Volume 2 f Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional B d R Budget Request Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital F nd Working Capital Fund Safeguards and Security Crosscut Pensions February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Volume 2 FY 2013 Congressional Budget Volume 2 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .............................................................................................................3

118

FY 2007 Statistical Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and conservation Operation and maintenance............................................ 1,779,399 1,791,372 1,917,331 +125,959 +7.0% Construction................................................................... 22,416 21,255 6,030 -15,225 -71.6% Total, Energy supply and conservation.............................. 1,801,815 1,812,627 1,923,361 +110,734 +6.1% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology..................................................... -160,000 -20,000 -- +20,000 +100.0% Fossil energy research and development.......................

119

FY 2012 Laboratory Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables y Preliminary February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0065 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables P li i Preliminary h b d i d i hi d h l l f b d h i f h The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2012 Congressional Budget

120

FY 2008 Statistical Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Current Congressional Congressional Approp. Request Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and conservation Operation and maintenance........................................... 1,781,242 1,917,331 2,187,943 +270,612 +14.1% Construction.................................................................... 31,155 6,030 -- -6,030 -100.0% Total, Energy supply and conservation............................. 1,812,397 1,923,361 2,187,943 +264,582 +13.8% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology.................................................... -20,000 -- -58,000 -58,000 N/A Fossil energy research and development......................

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

FY 2005 Volume 3  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Volume 3 February 2004 Volume 3 Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Energy Supply Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electric Transmission and Distribution Electric Transmission and Distribution Nuclear Energy Nuclear Energy Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Environment, Safety & Health Environment, Safety & Health Future Liabilities Future Liabilities Legacy Management Legacy Management Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request DOE/ME-0034 Volume 3 Energy Supply Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electric Transmission and Distribution

122

FY 2007 Volume 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chief Financial Officer Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-002 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-002 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2007 Congressional Budget

123

FY 2010 Volume 5  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 DOE/CF-039 Volume 5 Environmental Management Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Nuclear Waste Disposal May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 5 DOE/CF-039 Volume 5 Environmental Management Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Nuclear Waste Disposal Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Environmental Management Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Nuclear Waste Disposal Environmental Management Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Nuclear Waste Disposal Department of Energy FY 2010Congressional Budget Environmental Management/ Defense Nuclear Waste/Nuclear Waste Disposal Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3

124

FY 2009 Summary Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of Performance and financial information FY 2009 DOE/CF-0045 The Reports Consolidation Act of 2000 authorizes Federal agencies, with the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) concurrence, to consolidate various reports in order to provide performance, financial and related information in a more meaningful and useful format. In accordance with the Act, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE), has produced a consolidated Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) in previous years. For fiscal year (FY) 2009, the Department has chosen to produce an alternative report to the consolidated PAR and will produce an Agency Financial Report, an Annual Performance Report and a Summary of Performance and Financial

125

FY 2013 Volume 6  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Volume 6 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 DOE/CF-0076 Volume 6 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration

126

FY 2007 Volume 4  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 DOE/CF-005 Volume 4 Science Nuclear waste disposal Defense nuclear waste disposal Departmental administration Inspector general Working capital fund Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 DOE/CF-005 Volume 4 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Science Nuclear waste disposal Defense nuclear waste disposal Departmental administration Inspector general Working capital fund Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents

127

FY 2008 Volume 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 DOE/CF-014 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-014 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2008 Congressional Budget Volume 1 Table of Contents

128

FY 2005 Volume 5  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Volume 5 Environmental Management Environmental Management Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Environmental Services Defense Environmental Services Non Non - - Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Site Acceleration Completion Non Non - - Defense Environmental Services Defense Environmental Services Uranium Enrichment Decontamination Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund and Decommissioning Fund February 2004 Volume 5 Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request Environmental Management Environmental Management Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Site Acceleration Completion

129

FY 2010 Volume 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 DOE/CF-035 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 1 DOE/CF-035 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2010 Congressional Budget Volume 1 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3

130

FY 2005 Volume 7  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Volume 7 Interior & Related Agencies Interior & Related Agencies Fossil Energy Research & Development Fossil Energy Research & Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Elk Hills School Lands Fund Energy Conservation Energy Conservation Economic Regulation Economic Regulation Strategic Petroleum Reserve Strategic Petroleum Reserve Energy Information Administration Energy Information Administration Clean Coal Technology Clean Coal Technology February 2004 Volume 7 Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request Interior & Related Agencies Interior & Related Agencies

131

FY 2012 Volume 3  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Volume 3 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 3 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Volume 3 FY 2012 Congressional Budget Volume 3 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .............................................................................................................3

132

FY 2005 Volume 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Volume 1 February 2004 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Naval Reactors Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request DOE/ME-0032 Volume 1 February 2004 Volume 1 Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Printed with soy ink on recycled paper National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation

133

FY 2009 Volume 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 DOE/CF-024 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 1 DOE/CF-024 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2009 Congressional Budget Volume 1 Table of Contents

134

FY 2005 Volume 6  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration February 2004 Volume 6 Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request DOE/ME-0037 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration

135

FY 2010 Volume 3  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 DOE/CF-037 Volume 3 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Nuclear Energy May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 3 DOE/CF-037 Volume 3 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Nuclear Energy Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Nuclear Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Nuclear Energy Department of Energy/ Volume 3 FY 2010 Congressional Budget

136

FY 2012 Volume 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Volume 2 f Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional B d R Budget Request Other Defense Activities Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program Better Building Pilot Loan Guarantee Initiative for Universities Schools and Hospitals Universities, Schools, and Hospitals Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 g y Pensions Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Volume 2 FY 2012 Congressional Budget Volume 2 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .............................................................................................................3

137

FY 2011 Volume 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 DOE/CF-0048 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut Domestic Utility Fee Pensions Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request February 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 DOE/CF-0048 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut Domestic Utility Fee Pensions Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional

138

The Laboratory Performance Appraisal Process and Performance...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Modification No. 0164 Appendix B i ATTACHMENT J.2 APPENDIX B PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MEASUREMENT PLAN (PEMP) Applicable to the Operation of Ames Laboratory Contract No....

139

FY 2006 Summary Table by Appropriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appropriation Account Summary Appropriation Account Summary (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Energy And Water Development Energy Programs Energy supply....................................................................... Non-Defense site acceleration completion........................... Uranium enrichment D&D fund............................................ Non-Defense environmental services................................... Science................................................................................. Nuclear waste disposal......................................................... Departmental administration.................................................

140

FY 2007 Budget Highlights  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/CF-009 DOE/CF-009 Budget highlights Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Budget highlights Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-009 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................1 BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION ..............................................................................................................17 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATION ............................................................................................................18 SECTION 1. DEFENSE STRATEGIC GOAL........................................................................................19

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

FY 2006 Budget Highlights  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/ME-0053 DOE/ME-0053 Budget Highlights Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2005 DOE/ME-0053 Budget Highlights Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Table of Contents INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 1 BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION...................................................................................................... 15 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................... 16 FUNDING BY GOALS .................................................................................................................. 17 SECTION 1. DEFENSE STRATEGIC GOAL.................................................................................

142

FY 2012 Volume 6  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Volume 6 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration

143

FY 2010 Budget Highlights  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/CF-042 DOE/CF-042 Budget Highlights May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-042 Budget Highlights Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS........................................................................................................................ 5 BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION .............................................................................................................. 14 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................ 15 DETAILS BY PROGRAM

144

FY 2009 Budget Highlights  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/CF-031 DOE/CF-031 Budget Highlights February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-031 Budget Highlights Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION .............................................................................................................. 21 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................ 22 SECTION 1. ENERGY SECURITY.......................................................................................................

145

FY2012 LBNL LDRD Annual Report (PUB)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

8450, p36. LDRD FY2012 Annual Report [Publications List] 119Light LDRD FY2012 Annual Report [Publications List] 95List] LDRD FY2012 Annual Report depletion of branched and

Ho, Darren

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan FY 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan FY 2012 2 FY 2011 OIG Performance Results The OIG measures its performance against long-term and annual goals set forth in OIG planning documents. During this reporting period, the OIG successfully achieved its FY 2011 performance goals. The following are the specific results: Goal 1 Promote Presidential Reform Initiatives, Secretarial Mission Priorities, and Congress Objective 1: Conduct reviews seeking positive change in the Department relating to the implementation of Presidential Reform Initiatives, the Secretary's Mission Priorities, and the OIG-identified Management Challenges. Performance Measures: Accomplishments

147

Policy Flashes for FY 2011 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for FY 2011 for FY 2011 Policy Flashes for FY 2011 Archive of Policy Flashes issued in FY 2011. Number Topic 2011-104 Sources for Office Supplies 2011-103 Consent to Subcontracts on Management and Operating (M&O) Contracts. 2011-102 Guide Chapter 70.7 Subcontract Management-For Commercial Items & Services under $100,000. 2011-101 OFPP Policy Letter 11-01, Performance of Inherently Governmental and Critical Functions 2011-100 DOE O 227.1, Independent Oversight Program and DOE O 232.2, Occurence Reporting and Processing of Operations Information. 2011-99 Acquisition Career Management Handbook Change (Chapter 4 - FAP-C (Contracting Officer Warrant Requirements - Technology Investment Agreements) 2011-98 Class Deviation addressing Buy American Act requirements in Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) 970.5244-1, Contractor Purchasing System

148

Tanks Focus Area (TFA) Site Needs Assessment FY 1999  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the process used by the Tanks Focus Area (TFA) to analyze and develop responses to technology needs submitted by five major U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites with radioactive tank waste problems, and the initial results of the analysis. The sites are the Hanford Site, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), Savannah River Site (SRS), and West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP). This is the fifth edition of the TFA site needs assessment. As with previous editions, this edition serves to provide the basis for accurately defining the TFA program for the upcoming fiscal year (FY), and adds definition to the program for up to 4 additional outyears. Therefore, this version distinctly defines the FY 2000 progrti and adds further definition to the FY 2001- FY 2004 program. Each year, the TFA reviews and amends its program in response to site users' science and technology needs.

RW Allen

1999-05-03T23:59:59.000Z

149

FY 2008 & FY 2009 Annual Uncosted Balances Report | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Uncosted Balances Reports » FY 2008 & FY 2009 Uncosted Balances Reports » FY 2008 & FY 2009 Annual Uncosted Balances Report FY 2008 & FY 2009 Annual Uncosted Balances Report This report presents a combined presentation and analysis of the Department's uncosted balances for FY 2008 and FY 2009. In FY 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) provided the Department an additional $36.7 billion of funding. The FY 2009 uncosted balances associated with Recovery Act funding are separately presented but are not included in the additional analysis of uncosted balances in this report. FY 2008-2009 Report on Uncosted Balances More Documents & Publications FY 2010 Annual Uncosted Balances Report FY 2011 Annual Uncosted Balances Report FY 2012 Annual Uncosted Balances

150

Fossil Energy FY 2015 Budget in Brief  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Fossil Energy FY 2015 Budget in Brief document gives highlights to the budget request for the FY 2015 budget request for the Office of Fossil Energy.

151

The FY 2005 Budget Request  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

This presentation provides an overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's FY 2005 budget request to Congress.

152

The FY 2006 Budget Request  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

This presentation provides an overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's FY 2005 budget request to Congress.

153

Webinar: Review Core Competencies for Appraisers to Value Green Buildings  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Appraisal Foundation is developing a document to describe the fundamentals of the Valuation of Green Buildings. This document highlights the core skill sets and data necessary for appraisers to...

154

FY 2005 State Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Management, Budget Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 State Tables State Tables Preliminary Preliminary Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 State Tables State Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Preliminary Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. State Index Page Number

155

FY 2012 State Table  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request State Tables P li i Preliminary February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0066 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request State Tables P li i Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled

156

FY06 AR  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ACCOMPLISHMENTS ACCOMPLISHMENTS NETL Accomplishments FY 2006 2 NETL Accomplishments FY 2006 3 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR For 200 years, America's energy demands have grown at a remarkable rate. As we have moved from an agricultural society, through industrial expansion, and into the current technological era, our society's transformation has depended on reliable, affordable energy supplies. Energy reliance is not limited to the United States. The worldwide need for on-demand electricity, modern transportation, and industrial power is driving a steep rise in global energy consumption. By 2030, we will collectively consume nearly double the energy we use today. In this climate, U.S. energy security is critical. It demands our extracting the maximum available energy from

157

FY 2008 Volume 3  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 DOE/CF-016 Volume 3 Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 3 DOE/CF-016 Volume 3 Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Department of Energy/ Energy Supply and Conservation FY 2008 Congressional Budget

158

FY 2008 Volume 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 DOE/CF-015 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Health, Safety and Security Legacy Management Nuclear Energy Defense-Related Administrative Support Hearings and Appeals Safeguards and Security Crosscut Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 DOE/CF-015 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Health, Safety and Security Legacy Management Nuclear Energy Defense-Related Administrative Support Hearings and Appeals Safeguards and Security Crosscut Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut Department of Energy/ Other Defense Activities FY 2008 Congressional Budget Volume 2 Table of Contents Page

159

FY 2006 Volume 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 1 February 2005 DOE/ME-0046 Volume 1 Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 1 February 2005 DOE/ME-0046 Volume 1 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2006 Congressional Budget

160

Microsoft Word - No Fear Stats FY03.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 EEO Year End Data 3 EEO Year End Data October 1, 2002 through September 30, 2003 I. Complaint Activity: 29 CFR §1614.704(a) - (c) Number/Totals Complaints Filed in FY: 1614.704(a) 70 Individual Filers (Complainants): 1614.704(b) 61 Repeat Filers: 1614.704(c) 9 II. Complaints by Basis: 29 CFR §1614.704(d) Basis Number/Totals Age 37 Color 13 Disability 22 National Origin 15 Race 35 Religion 8 Reprisal 72 Sex (Includes Complaints Filed Under Equal Pay Act) 39 Other 0 III. Complaints by Issue: 29 CFR §1614.704(e) Issue Number/Totals Appointment/Hire 6 Assignment of Duties 16 Awards 7 Conversion to Full-Time 0 Disciplinary Actions -- -- Demotion 1 Reprimand 11 Suspension 3 Removal 2 Other 0 Duty Hours 2 Evaluation/Appraisal 3 Examination/Test 0 Harassment - Non-Sexual 21

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Microsoft Word - No Fear Stats FY06.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 EEO Year End Data 6 EEO Year End Data October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006 I. Complaint Activity: 29 CFR §1614.704(a) - (c) Number/Totals Complaints Filed in FY: 1614.704(a) 74 Individual Filers (Complainants): 1614.704(b) 71 Repeat Filers: 1614.704(c) 3 II. Complaints by Basis: 29 CFR §1614.704(d) Basis Number/Totals Age 25 Color 10 Disability 25 National Origin 9 Race 18 Religion 2 Reprisal 47 Sex (Includes Complaints Filed Under Equal Pay Act) 25 Other 0 III. Complaints by Issue: 29 CFR §1614.704(e) Issue Number/Totals Appointment/Hire 9 Assignment of Duties 12 Awards 2 Conversion to Full-Time 1 Disciplinary Actions -- -- Demotion 1 Reprimand 2 Suspension 0 Removal 1 Other 0 Duty Hours 0 Evaluation/Appraisal 3 Examination/Test 0 Harassment - Non-Sexual 25

162

Microsoft Word - No Fear Stats FY02.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 EEO Year End Data 2 EEO Year End Data October 1, 2001 through September 30, 2002 I. Complaint Activity: 29 CFR §1614.704(a) - (c) Number/Totals Complaints Filed in FY: 1614.704(a) 84 Individual Filers (Complainants): 1614.704(b) 74 Repeat Filers: 1614.704(c) 6 II. Complaints by Basis: 29 CFR §1614.704(d) Basis Number/Totals Age 57 Color 4 Disability 31 National Origin 14 Race 41 Religion 7 Reprisal 76 Sex (Includes Complaints Filed Under Equal Pay Act) 67 Other 0 III. Complaints by Issue: 29 CFR §1614.704(e) Issue Number/Totals Appointment/Hire 0 Assignment of Duties 20 Awards 2 Conversion to Full-Time 0 Disciplinary Actions -- -- Demotion 0 Reprimand 5 Suspension 2 Removal 1 Other 8 Duty Hours 1 Evaluation/Appraisal 8 Examination/Test 0 Harassment - Non-Sexual 27

163

Quality and ES H Self-Appraisal Program at the Center for Applied Physics, Engineering and Testing  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the Quality and ES H Self-Appraisal Program at the Center for Applied Physics, Engineering and Testing, 9300 and explains how the program promotes good Conduct of Operations'' throughout the center and helps line managers improve efficiency and maintain a safe work environment. The program provides a means to identify and remove hazards and to ensure workers are following correct and safe procedures; but, most importantly, 9300's Self-Appraisal program uses DOE's Conduct of Operations'' and Quality Assurance'' guidelines to evaluate the manager's policies and decisions. The idea is to draw attention to areas for improvement in ES H while focusing on how well the organization's processes and programs are doing. A copy of the Administrative Procedure which establishes and defines the program, as well as samples of a Self-Appraisal Report and a Manager's Response to the Self-Appraisal Report are provided as appendixes.

Sullivan, J.J.; Zawadzkas, G.A.

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

Quality and ES&H Self-Appraisal Program at the Center for Applied Physics, Engineering and Testing  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the Quality and ES&H Self-Appraisal Program at the Center for Applied Physics, Engineering and Testing, 9300 and explains how the program promotes good ``Conduct of Operations`` throughout the center and helps line managers improve efficiency and maintain a safe work environment. The program provides a means to identify and remove hazards and to ensure workers are following correct and safe procedures; but, most importantly, 9300`s Self-Appraisal program uses DOE`s ``Conduct of Operations`` and ``Quality Assurance`` guidelines to evaluate the manager`s policies and decisions. The idea is to draw attention to areas for improvement in ES&H while focusing on how well the organization`s processes and programs are doing. A copy of the Administrative Procedure which establishes and defines the program, as well as samples of a Self-Appraisal Report and a Manager`s Response to the Self-Appraisal Report are provided as appendixes.

Sullivan, J.J.; Zawadzkas, G.A.

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

165

Investigation of Micro- and Macro-Scale Transport Processes for Improved Fuel Cell Performance - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Jon P. Owejan (Primary Contact), Matthew Mench, Michael Hickner, Satish Kandlikar, Thomas Trabold, Jeffrey Gagliardo, Anusorn Kongkanand, Wenbin Gu, Paul Nicotera General Motors 10 Carriage Street Honeoye Falls, NY 14472 Phone: (585) 953-5558 Email: jon.owejan@gm.com DOE Managers HQ: Donna Ho Phone: (202) 586-8000 Email: Donna.Ho@ee.doe.gov GO: David Peterson Phone: (720) 356-1747 Email: David.Peterson@go.doe.gov Technical Advisor John Kopasz Phone: (630) 252-7531 Email: kopasz@anl.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0000470 Subcontractors: * Penn State University, University Park, PA * University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN

166

Accelerator/Experiment Operations - FY01 through FY03  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

230 230 January 2004 Accelerator/Experiment Operations - FY 2001 Through FY 2003 J. Conrad, D. Denisov, S. Holmes, M. Lindgren, W. Louis, R. Roser Edited by J. Appel This Technical Memorandum (TM) summarizes the accelerator and experiment operations for the period FY 2001 through FY 2003. The plan is to have an annual TM to gather such information in one place. In this case, the information concerns the startup of Run II at the Tevatron Collider and the beginning of the MiniBooNE neutrino experiment. While the focus is on the FY 2003 efforts, this document includes summaries of the earlier years where available for completeness. Each section was prepared by the relevant authors, and was somewhat edited for uniformity for inclusion in this summary.

167

Technical safety appraisal: Buildings 776/777 Rocky Flats Plant  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Buildings 776/777 at the Rocky Flats Plant are major components of the production complex at the plant site. They have been in operation since 1957. The operations taking place in the buildings are nuclear weapons production support, processing of weapons assemblies returned from Pantex, waste processing, research and development in support of production, special projects, and those generated by support groups, such as maintenance. The appraisal team identified nine deficiencies that it believed required prompt attention. DOE management for EH, the program office (Defense Programs), and the field office analyzed the information provided by the appraisal team and instituted compensatory measures for closer monitoring of contractor activities by knowledgeable DOE staff and staff from other sites. Concurrently, the contractor was requested to address both short-term and long-term remedial measures to correct the identified issues as well as the underlying problems. The contractor has provided his action plan, which is included. This plan was under evaluation by EH and the DOE program office at the time this report was prepared. In addressing the major areas of concern identified above, a well as the specific deficiencies identified by the appraisal team, the contractor and the field office are cautioned to search for the root causes for the problems and to direct corrective actions to those root causes rather than solely to the symptoms to assure the sustainability of the improvements being made. The results of prior TSAs led DOE to conclude that previous corrective actions were not sufficient in that a large number of the individual findings are recurrent. Pending completion of remedial actions over the next few months, enhanced DOE oversight of the contractor is warranted.

Field, H C

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

FY 2012 Highlighted Sustainable Targets and Initiatives | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

FY 2012 Highlighted Sustainable Targets and Initiatives FY 2012 Highlighted Sustainable Targets and Initiatives Joint Environmental Management System (EMS) Goals FY 2012...

169

FY 2014 Real Property Data Related to Operations and Maintenance...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

FY 2014 Real Property Data Related to Operations and Maintenance Guidance FY 2014 Real Property Data Related to Operations and Maintenance Guidance FY2014DataRelatedtoOperatio...

170

FY 2013 Conference Waiver - Emergency Management Issues Special...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

FY 2013 Conference Waiver - Emergency Management Issues Special Interest Group FY 2013 Conference Waiver - Emergency Management Issues Special Interest Group FY 2013 Conference...

171

Fuel Cell Technologies Program FY 2013 Budget Request Rollout...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Program FY 2013 Budget Request Rollout to Stakeholders Fuel Cell Technologies Program FY 2013 Budget Request Rollout to Stakeholders Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the FY 2013...

172

FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

state tables state tables preliminary Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of Chief Financial Officer state tables preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. State Index Page Number FY 2007 Congressional Budget 1/31/2006 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 12:09:13PM Page 1 of 2 FY 2005 Appropriation FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007 Request State Table 1 1 $32,439

173

FY 2011 OCIO Congressional Budget  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Departmental Administration/ Departmental Administration/ Chief Information Officer/ FY 2011 Congressional Budget Chief Information Officer Funding Profile by Subprogram (dollars in thousands) FY 2009 Current Appropriati on FY 2009 Current Recovery Act Appropriatio n FY 2010 Current Appropriation FY 2011 Request Chief Information Officer Cyber Security 34,512 0 33,365 35,872 Corporate Management Information Program 27,250 0 9,403 8,933 Energy Information Technology Services 0 0 22,149 21,120 Program Direction 53,738 5,700 38,146 36,238 Total, Chief Information Officer 115,500 5,700 103,063 102,163 Public Law Authorizations: Public Law 103-62: 'Government Performance Results Act of 1993' Public Law 104-106: 'Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996'

174

Environmental management compliance reengineering project, FY 1997 report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Through an integrated reengineering effort, the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) is successfully implementing process improvements that will permit safe and compliant operations to continue during the next 5 years, even though $80 million was removed from the Environmental Management (EM) program budget. A 2-year analysis, design, and implementation project will reengineer compliance-related activities and reduce operating costs by approximately $17 million per year from Fiscal Year (FY) 1998 through 2002, while continuing to meet the INEEL`s environment, safety, and health requirements and milestone commitments. Compliance reengineer`s focus is improving processes, not avoiding full compliance with environmental, safety, and health laws. In FY 1997, compliance reengineering used a three-phase approach to analyze, design, and implement the changes that would decrease operating costs. Implementation for seven specific improvement projects was completed in FY 1997, while five projects will complete implementation in FY 1998. During FY 1998, the three-phase process will be repeated to continue reengineering the INEEL.

VanVliet, J.A.; Davis, J.N.

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

Role of Appraisals in Energy Efficiency Financing  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This research identifies barriers and challenges and current industry status including several key appraisal industry developments for identifying and valuing energy efficiency, critical obstacles to documenting and assessing the potential added value from energy efficiency improvements, current opportunities to support and standardize reporting on energy efficiency and to ensure proper valuation, and next steps towards enabling energy efficiency financing market transformation.

Doyle, V.; Bhargava, A.

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

Energy considerations in real estate appraising  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Purposes of the seminar on the subject, the basis of this report, include the following: (1) to provide the appraiser an opportunity to learn how to identify and analyze the actual physical consumption of energy as well as the energy-saving improvements in properties under appraisal and in comparable sale and lease properties; (2) to help the appraiser in developing methods to keep meaningful records on the energy consumption of subject and comparable properties so as to observe in an orderly way the behavior of buyers, sellers, tenants, landlords, borrowers, and lenders with respect to energy efficiency; and (3) to assist the appraiser in learning to measure the relative sensitivities of the various segments of the market to energy considerations as indicated by differences in sale prices and rentals. To achieve these goals, the seminar employed two case studies, one for a angle-family residence and one for a multi-family building, both in Topeka, Kansas. The case studies are for illustrative purposes only; in applying the lessons of the seminar to their own daily work, students should be careful to develop information that is pertinent to their subject properties and subject areas and not rely on any of the particulars laid out in the cases.

None

1980-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

177

FY 2006 Volume 5  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 February 2005 DOE/ME-0050 Volume 5 Environmental Management Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Environmental Services Non-Defense Site Acceleration Completion Non-Defense Environmental Services Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 5 February 2005 DOE/ME-0050 Volume 5 Environmental Management Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Environmental Services Non-Defense Site Acceleration Completion Non-Defense Environmental Services Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Environmental Services Non-Defense Site Acceleration Completion

178

FY 2009 Volume 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 DOE/CF-025 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 2 DOE/CF-025 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration

179

FY 2007 Volume 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 DOE/CF-003 Volume 2 Other defense activities Security & Safety Performance assurance Environment, safety & health Legacy management Nuclear energy Defense related administrative support Hearings and appeals Safeguards & security crosscut Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 DOE/CF-003 Volume 2 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Other defense activities Security & Safety Performance assurance Environment, safety & health Legacy management Nuclear energy Defense related administrative support Hearings and appeals Safeguards & security crosscut Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut Department of Energy/

180

FY 2006 Volume 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 February 2005 DOE/ME-0047 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Security & Performance Assurance Environment, Safety & Health Legacy Management Nuclear Energy Defense Related Administrative Support Office of Hearings & Appeals Safeguards & Security Crosscut Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 2 February 2005 DOE/ME-0047 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Security & Performance Assurance Environment, Safety & Health Legacy Management Nuclear Energy Defense Related Administrative Support Office of Hearings & Appeals Safeguards & Security Crosscut Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

FY 2006 Volume 6  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 February 2005 DOE/ME-0051 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 6 February 2005 DOE/ME-0051 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration

182

FY 2009 Volume 6  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 DOE/CF-029 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 6 DOE/CF-029 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration

183

FY 2006 Volume 4  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Science Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 4 February 2005 DOE/ME-0049 Volume 4 Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 4 February 2005 DOE/ME-0049 Volume 4 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund

184

FY 2008 Volume 6  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 DOE/CF-019 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 DOE/CF-019 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Department of Energy/

185

FY 2010 Volume 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 DOE/CF-036 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 2 DOE/CF-036 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program

186

FY 2010 Volume 6  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 DOE/CF-040 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 6 DOE/CF-040 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Department of Energy/

187

FY 2008 Volume 4  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 DOE/CF-017 Volume 4 Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 DOE/CF-017 Volume 4 Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund

188

FY 2009 Volume 3  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 DOE/CF-026 Volume 3 Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 3 DOE/CF-026 Volume 3 Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management

189

FY 2007 Volume 3  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 DOE/CF-004 Volume 3 Energy supply and Conservation Energy efficiency and renewable energy Electricity delivery and energy reliability Nuclear energy Environment, safety and health Legacy management Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 3 DOE/CF-004 Volume 3 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Energy supply and Conservation Energy efficiency and renewable energy Electricity delivery and energy reliability Nuclear energy Environment, safety and health Legacy management Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Environment, Safety and Health Legacy Management Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability

190

FY 2007 Volume 6  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 DOE/CF-007 Volume 6 Power marketing administrations Southeastern power administration Southwestern power administration Western power administration Bonneville power administration Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 DOE/CF-007 Volume 6 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Power marketing administrations Southeastern power administration Southwestern power administration Western power administration Bonneville power administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Department of Energy/

191

FY 2006 Volume 7  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 February 2005 DOE/ME-0052 Volume 7 Interior & Related Agencies Fossil Energy Research & Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Energy Conservation Economic Regulation Strategic Petroleum Reserve Energy Information Administration Clean Coal Technology Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 7 February 2005 DOE/ME-0052 Volume 7 Interior & Related Agencies Fossil Energy Research & Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Energy Conservation Economic Regulation Strategic Petroleum Reserve Energy Information Administration Clean Coal Technology Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Fossil Energy Research and Development

192

ALCATOR C-MOD FY03-FY04 WORK PROPOSAL  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

(Draft) (Draft) ALCATOR C-MOD FY03-FY04 WORK PROPOSAL March 2002 Submitted to: Office of Fusion Energy Sciences Office of Energy Research U.S. Department of Energy Germantown, MD 20874 Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 ALCATOR C-MOD FY03-04 WORK PROPOSAL Table of Contents 1. Introduction.......................................................................................... 1 2. Alcator C-Mod Research Areas ............................................................11 2.1 Advanced Tokamak Thrust ............................................................11 2.2 Burning Plasma Experiment Support..............................................25 2.3 Transport

193

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Annual Performance Results and FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG’s FY 2010 actual performance and FY 2011 planned activities.

194

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Annual Performance Report and FY 2003 Annual Performance Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Subject: Office of Inspector General’s combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Annual Performance Results and FY 2003 Annual Performance Plan

195

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Annual Performance Results and FY 2012 Annual Performance Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG’s FY 2011 actual performance and FY 2012 planned activities.

196

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Annual Performance Results and FY 2007 Annual Performance Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG’s FY 2006 actual performance and FY 2007 planned activities.

197

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Annual Performance Results and FY 2008 Annual Performance Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG’s FY 2007 actual performance and FY 2008 planned activities.

198

Attachment FY2011-74 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 OPAM Attachment FY2011-74 OPAM Acquisition Letter AL 2011-05 FAL 2011-01 Attachment FY2011-74 OPAM More Documents & Publications Attachment FY2011-74 OPAM Attachment FY2011-74...

199

Advanced evaporator technology progress report FY 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the work that was completed in FY 1992 on the program {open_quotes}Technology Development for Concentrating Process Streams.{close_quotes} The purpose of this program is to evaluate and develop evaporator technology for concentrating radioactive waste and product streams such as those generated by the TRUEX process. Concentrating these streams and minimizing the volume of waste generated can significantly reduce disposal costs; however, equipment to concentrate the streams and recycle the decontaminated condensates must be installed. LICON, Inc., is developing an evaporator that shows a great deal of potential for this application. In this report, concepts that need to be incorporated into the design of an evaporator operated in a radioactive environment are discussed. These concepts include criticality safety, remote operation and maintenance, and materials of construction. Both solubility and vapor-liquid equilibrium data are needed to design an effective process for concentrating process streams. Therefore, literature surveys were completed and are summarized in this report. A model that is being developed to predict vapor phase compositions is described. A laboratory-scale evaporator was purchased and installed to study the evaporation process and to collect additional data. This unit is described in detail. Two new LICON evaporators are being designed for installation at Argonne-East in FY 1993 to process low-level radioactive waste generated throughout the laboratory. They will also provide operating data from a full-sized evaporator processing radioactive solutions. Details on these evaporators are included in this report.

Chamberlain, D.; Hutter, J.C.; Leonard, R.A. [and others

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

200

Accelerator/Experiment Operations - FY01 through FY03  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

88-DO 88-DO October 2004 Accelerator/Experiment Operations - FY 2004 C. Bromberg, J. Conrad, D. Denisov, S. Holmes, W. Louis, A. Meyer, C. Moore, R. Raja, E. Ramberg, R. Roser Edited by J. Appel This Technical Memorandum (TM) summarizes the accelerator and experiment operations for FY 2004. It is one of a series of annual publications intended to gather information in one place. In this case, the information concerns the FY 2004 Run II at the Tevatron Collider, the MiniBooNE neutrino experiment, and SY 120 activities. Each section was prepared by the relevant authors, and was somewhat edited for uniformity for inclusion in this summary. Collider (Steve Holmes) FY 2004 began with the accelerator complex in the middle of an annual, scheduled

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

EERE FY 2015 Budget Request  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Technologies eere.energy.gov 7 FY 2015 EERE Budget Request - 2.317B Vehicles, 359M Bioenergy, 253M Fuel Cells, 93M Advanced Manufacturing, 305M Buildings, 212M...

202

The Economic University, FY2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Economic Impact of Binghamton University, FY2011 (July 1, 2010-June 30, 2011) Office....................................................................................................................2 ECONOMIC OUTPUT and Tioga counties) and the New York State economy in terms of economic output, jobs, and human capital

Suzuki, Masatsugu

203

NNSA FY14 BUDGET REQUEST  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

FY14 BUDGET REQUEST FY14 BUDGET REQUEST We're keeping the American people safe. President Obama has laid out the most ambitious view of nuclear security in decades. Our nonproliferation, counterterrorism, and modern-day nuclear deterrent programs keep the American people safe every day. The President remains committed to a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear deterrent, and his FY14 budget provides $7.9 billion for NNSA's weapons activities. o Our Life Extension Programs (LEPs) are moving forward to ensure the aging American nuclear weapons deterrent remains safe, secure, and effective. $1 billion is requested in FY14 to directly support these programs. The W76-1 LEP, now in Phase 6.6 full

204

FY 2006 Volume 3  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Supply Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electric Transmission and Distribution Nuclear Energy Environment, Safety & Health Legacy Management Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 3 February 2005 DOE/ME-0048 Volume 3 Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electric Transmission and Distribution Nuclear Energy Environment, Safety & Health Legacy Management Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 3 February 2005 DOE/ME-0048 Volume 3 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electric Transmission and Distribution Nuclear Energy Environment, Safety and Health Legacy Management Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

205

FY 2007 Volume 7  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 DOE/CF-008 Volume 7 Fossil energy and other Fossil energy research and development Naval petroleum & oil shale reserves Elk hills school lands fund Strategic petroleum reserve Clean coal technology Energy information administration Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 7 DOE/CF-008 Volume 7 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Fossil energy and other Fossil energy research and development Naval petroleum & oil shale reserves Elk hills school lands fund Strategic petroleum reserve Clean coal technology Energy information administration Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Strategic Petroleum Reserve Clean Coal Technology

206

FY 2008 Volume 7  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 DOE/CF-020 Volume 7 Fossil Energy and Other Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Strategic Petroleum Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas Energy Information Administration Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 7 DOE/CF-020 Volume 7 Fossil Energy and Other Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Strategic Petroleum Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas Energy Information Administration Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves

207

FY 2006 funded projects  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 Brookhaven National Laboratory FY 2006 LDRD PROJECTS LDRD Project Project Title P.I. Dept/Bldg. 03-104 Hydrogen Atom Transfer from Carbon to Metal - Relevance of a Novel Reaction to Catalyzed Hydrocarbon Conversions M. Bullock CHEM/555A 04-011 Femtosecond Photoinitiated Nanoparticle Surface Chemistry N. Camillone CHEM/555 04-013 Chirped Pulse Amplification at the DUV-FEL L.H. Yu NSLS/725C 04-025 Overcoming Coherent Instabilities at Medium- Energy Storage Rings J.-M. Wang NSLS/725C 04-033 Layered Cobaltates with High Thermoelectric Power Qiang Li MSD/480 04-038 Complex Thin Films and Nanomaterial Properties J. Misewich MSD/480 04-041 Lattice QCD relevant for RHIC and AGS P. Petreczky PHYS/510A 04-043 Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation

208

FY 2010 Volume 7  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 DOE/CF-041 Volume 7 Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 7 DOE/CF-041 Volume 7 Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas

209

Operating plan FY 1998  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the first edition of Argonne`s new Operating Plan. The Operating Plan complements the strategic planning in the Laboratory`s Institutional Plan by focusing on activities that are being pursued in the immediate fiscal year, FY 1998. It reflects planning that has been done to date, and it will serve in the future as a resource and a benchmark for understanding the Laboratory`s performance. The heart of the Institutional Plan is the set of major research initiatives that the Laboratory is proposing to implement in future years. In contrast, this Operating Plan focuses on Argonne`s ongoing R&D programs, along with cost-saving measures and other improvements being implemented in Laboratory support operations.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

Engineering (FY2011 and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

MD 2,3 (FY2011 and beyond) MBA2 (first year) LAW 2 10% 4 * 1,914 2,040 2,198 2,682 2,268 15% 6 3 2,871,792 10,728 9,072 50% 20 8, 9, or 10 9,570 10,200 10,990 13,410 11,340 TGR 4-20 0-3 2,871 2,871 - 2,871 2,871,785 5,100 5,495 6,705 5,670 80% 32 4 3,828 4,080 4,396 5,364 4,536 85% 34 3 2,871 3,060 3,297 4,023 3

Kay, Mark A.

211

Fourth Quarter FY 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 2009 1 December 2009 1 Fourth Quarter FY 2009 December 1, 2009; Issue No. 61 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A (continued on page 8) DOE Begins Online Posting of Categorical Exclusion Determinations The Department of Energy (DOE) is now posting most of its categorical exclusion (CX) determinations on the web under a policy that went into effect November 2, 2009. In establishing the policy, Deputy Secretary Daniel B. Poneman referred to President Obama's commitment to "creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government," including by posting information online. "Such openness is especially important when the information relates to the Department's

212

FY 2009 Volume 7  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 DOE/CF-030 Volume 7 Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 7 DOE/CF-030 Volume 7 Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas

213

Sandia National Laboratories: 2014 Green Mortgage Appraisal Roundtable  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Green Mortgage Appraisal Roundtable PV Value Tool Featured at Washington D.C. Roundtable On April 1, 2014, in Energy, News, News & Events, Partnership, Photovoltaic, Renewable...

214

Albertsons Library Library Facts FY 2007/08  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Albertsons Library Library Facts FY 2007/08 http://library.boisestate.edu/ Collection Statistics,473 Library Tours 228 Interlibrary Loan Requests Processed 13,728 Number of Hours Open Per Week 98.5 Questions or comments regarding Collection Development should be addressed to Peggy Cooper, Association Dean, Library

Barrash, Warren

215

FY 2016 Congressional Budget Request for OE  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FY 2016 Budget in Brief and detailed Congressional Budget Request for OE. The FY 2016 request reflects the Administration’s priority on modernizing the electric grid and boosting the resilience of infrastructure.

216

FY 2013 Summary Table by Organization  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

FY 2013 vs. FY 2012 Current Enacted 1 Request % National Security Weapons Activities 6,865,775 7,214,120 7,577,341 +363,221 +5.0% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 2,281,371...

217

FY 2016 Budget Request Now Available  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability’s FY 2016 Budget Request is now available. The FY 2016 request reflects the Administration’s priority on modernizing the electric grid and boosting the resilience of infrastructure.

218

CRSP South Capital Investment Plan FY12-FY21 Detail  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9/2011 9/2011 CRSP South Capital Investment Plan FY12-FY21 Detail Yellow Highlight = New Project to list W Total = Western Only Costs Red Text = Change from previous version O Total = Trust and Joint Participation Costs Blue Text = will be removed from list FY Total = Sum of W Total and O Total Green Highlight = Annual Equipment Replacement Programs MPS Split = Multiple Power System Cost Split. Fund PROJECT PROJECT Power Sys TOTAL W Total W PD W Non-PD O Total FY TOTAL W Total W PD W Non-PD O Total FY TOTAL Transmission Lines Environmental Support for Lands, Access Roads, and ROW's CRSPVMF 450 110 10 100 110 110 10 100 110 Lidar Closeout at Pinnacle Peak and Rogers CRSPVMF 15 15 15 15 Pinnacle Peak-Rogers ROW Agreement CRSPVMF 6,100 6,100 100 6,000 6,100 T-Line SubTotal 6,565 125 25 100 125 6,210 110

219

Department of Energy FY 2012 OMB Scorecard  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Scorecard reporting Department of Energy sustainability achievements for fiscal year (FY) 2012.

220

Department of Energy FY 2011 OMB Scorecard  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Scorecard reporting Department of Energy sustainability achievements for fiscal year (FY) 2011.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Department of Energy FY 2010 OMB Scorecard  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Scorecard reporting Department of Energy sustainability achievements for fiscal year (FY) 2010.

222

FY 2008 Meetings  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fiscal Year 2008 Meetings Fiscal Year 2008 Meetings Meetings, Minutes and Handouts Date Type Time Location Agenda Handouts Minutes Nov 6, 2007 EMPIRE Committee 2:30 - 3:45 p.m. 821 E. Amargosa Farm Road Amargosa Valley, NV 89020 Fact Sheet Review n/a Minutes Nov 6, 2007 Budget Committee 4 - 5 p.m. 821 E. Amargosa Farm Road Amargosa Valley, NV 89020 FY 2008 Budget Update Handouts Minutes Nov 6, 2007 Full Board Meeting 6 p.m. 821 E. Amargosa Farm Road Amargosa Valley, NV 89020 Agenda Handouts Minutes Nov 27, 2007 Transportation/Waste Committee 3 p.m. Conference call Transportation Routes n/a Minutes Jan 10, 2008 EMPIRE Committee 3:15 - 4:15 Bob Ruud Community Center 150 Hwy 160, Pahrump, NV n/a n/a Minutes Jan 10, 2008 Outreach Ad Hoc Committee 4:30 - 5:30 Bob Ruud Community Center 150 Hwy 160, Pahrump, NV n/a n/a Minutes

223

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT DIVISION. ANNUAL REPORT FY 1980  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

systems for auditors and appraisers, and energy and peakan "energy signature" for the house. Two auditors then makeauditor, at the time of the visit, will implement simple energy-

Authors, Various

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

224

Tanks Focus Area Site Needs Assessment - FY 2001  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The TFA uses a systematic process for developing its annual program that draws from the tanks science and technology development needs expressed by the five DOE tank waste sites. TFA's annual program development process is iterative and involves the following steps: Collection of site needs; Needs analysis; Development of technical responses and initial prioritization; Refinement of the program for the next fiscal year; Formulation of the Corporate Review Budget (CRB); Preparation of Program Execution Guidance (PEG) for the next FY Revision of the Multiyear Program Plan (MYPP). This document describes the outcomes of the first phase of this process, from collection of site needs to the initial prioritization of technical activities. The TFA received site needs in October - December 2000. A total of 170 site needs were received, an increase of 30 over the previous year. The needs were analyzed and integrated, where appropriate. Sixty-six distinct technical responses were drafted and prioritized. In addition, seven strategic tasks were approved to compete for available funding in FY 2002 and FY 2003. Draft technical responses were prepared and provided to the TFA Site Representatives and the TFA User Steering Group (USG) for their review and comment. These responses were discussed at a March 15, 2001, meeting where the TFA Management Team established the priority listing in preparation for input to the DOE Office of Science and Technology (OST) budget process. At the time of publication of this document, the TFA continues to finalize technical responses as directed by the TFA Management Team and clarify the intended work scopes for FY 2002 and FY 2003.

Allen, Robert W.; Josephson, Gary B.; Westsik, Joseph H.; Nickola, Cheryl L.

2001-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

225

FY 2006 Control Table by Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Organization Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons........................................................................................ 6,447,159 6,583,350 6,630,133 +46,783 +0.7% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................................................... 1,367,709 1,422,103 1,637,239 +215,136 +15.1% Naval Reactors............................................................................... 761,872 801,437 786,000 -15,437 -1.9% Office of the Administrator.............................................................. 352,949 357,051 343,869 -13,182 -3.7% Other Defense Activities................................................................. -446 -- -- -- --

226

FY 2012 Control Table by Appropriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY 2012 Summary Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 Current Congressional Annualized Congressional Approp. Request CR Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy....................................... 2,216,392 2,355,473 2,242,500 3,200,053 +983,661 +44.4% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................................ 168,484 185,930 171,982 237,717 +69,233 +41.1% Nuclear energy............................................................................. 774,578 824,052 786,637 754,028

227

FY11 OE public summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

The FY 2011 Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) budget request is $185.9 million, $14.0 million more than the FY 2010 Appropriation, which reflects increased investments in research and development, particularly in energy storage, advanced grid modeling and power electronics. The FY 2011 request supports the efforts of the Research and Development program; the Permitting, Siting, and Analysis program; and the Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration program to modernize the electric grid, enhance security and reliability of the energy infrastructure, and facilitate recovery from disruptions to the energy supply. The proposed budget provides a balanced and diverse portfolio of activities, including: Research and Development ($144.3 million)

228

OPT Annual Report, FY 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OPT Annual Report, FY 2012 OPT Annual Report, FY 2012 i Executive Summary The Office of Environmental Management (EM) was established to mitigate the risks and hazards posed by the legacy of nuclear weapons production and research. The most ambitious and far ranging of these missions is dealing with the environmental legacy of the Cold War. Many problems posed by its operations are unique, and include the transportation of unprecedented amounts of contaminated waste, water, and soil, and a vast number of contaminated structures during remediation of the contaminated sites. Since Fiscal Year (FY) 2004, EM has completed over 150,000 shipments of radioactive material and waste. The mission of the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Packaging and Transportation (OPT) positioned

229

Geothermal Materials Development, Annual Report FY 1991  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Advances in the development of new materials, the commercial availabilities of which are essential for the attainment of Hydrothermal Category Level I and II Objectives, continue to be made in the Geothermal Materials Development Project. Many successes have already been accrued and the results used commercially. In FY 1991, utility company sponsored full cost'' recovery programs based upon materials technology developed in this project were initiated on topics such as condensing heat exchangers, high temperature composites for utility vaults used in district heating systems, and corrosion resistant coatings for use in oil-fired electric generating processes. In FY 1991 the DOE/GD-sponsored R D project was focused on reducing well drilling, fluid transport and energy conversion costs. Specific activities being performed included lightweight CO{sub 2}- resistant well cements, chemical systems for lost circulation control, thermally conductive and scale resistant protective linear systems, corrosion mitigation in process components at The Geysers, and elastomer-metal bonding systems needed for use in high temperature well drilling and safety related applications.

Kukacka, L.E.

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

Geothermal Materials Development. Annual report FY 1991  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Advances in the development of new materials, the commercial availabilities of which are essential for the attainment of Hydrothermal Category Level I and II Objectives, continue to be made in the Geothermal Materials Development Project. Many successes have already been accrued and the results used commercially. In FY 1991, utility company sponsored ``full cost`` recovery programs based upon materials technology developed in this project were initiated on topics such as condensing heat exchangers, high temperature composites for utility vaults used in district heating systems, and corrosion resistant coatings for use in oil-fired electric generating processes. In FY 1991 the DOE/GD-sponsored R&D project was focused on reducing well drilling, fluid transport and energy conversion costs. Specific activities being performed included lightweight CO{sub 2}- resistant well cements, chemical systems for lost circulation control, thermally conductive and scale resistant protective linear systems, corrosion mitigation in process components at The Geysers, and elastomer-metal bonding systems needed for use in high temperature well drilling and safety related applications.

Kukacka, L.E.

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

231

Performance Period Total Fee Paid FY2001  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 01 $4,547,400 FY2002 $4,871,000 FY2003 $6,177,902 FY2004 $8,743,007 FY2005 $13,134,189 FY2006 $7,489,704 FY2007 $9,090,924 FY2008 $10,045,072 FY2009 $12,504,247 FY2010 $17,590,414 FY2011 $17,558,710 FY2012 $14,528,770 Cumulative Fee Paid $126,281,339 Cost Plus Award Fee DE-AC29-01AL66444 Washington TRU Solutions LLC Contractor: Contract Number: Contract Type: $8,743,007 Contract Period: $1,813,482,000 Fee Information Maximum Fee $131,691,744 Total Estimated Contract Cost: $4,547,400 $4,871,000 $6,177,902 October 2000 - September 2012 Minimum Fee $0 Fee Available EM Contractor Fee Site: Carlsbad Field Office - Carlsbad, NM Contract Name: Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Operations March 2013 $13,196,690 $9,262,042 $10,064,940 $14,828,770 $12,348,558 $12,204,247 $17,590,414 $17,856,774

232

Texas Tech University Energy Savings Program FY 2014 Update  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, we experienced a net increase in energy costs for FY14 of $93,300, even though total energy use has energy consumption for the prior fiscal year. Through FY14, the campus consumed 153.04 kbtu/ft2 `13 ­ August `14 FY13 Gallons Consumed FY14 Goal (5% Decline) FY14 Gallons Consumed Percent Change 1st

Zhuang, Yu

233

FY 2007 Annual Performance Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Focuses on detailed performance information including performance targets associated with the Department’s budget activities. The report discusses individual and summary performance measure results through narrative descriptions with references to supporting documentation, a concise statement on highlevel program challenges and benefits, and the status of all FY 2006 unmet measures.

234

Attachment FY2011-73 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

73 OPAM Attachment FY2011-73 OPAM Acquisition Letter AL-2011-04 Attachment FY2011-73 OPAM More Documents & Publications Policy Flash 2011-73 G Attachment FY2011-68...

235

Attachment FY2011-68 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

68 OPAM Attachment FY2011-68 OPAM Acquisition Letter AL-2011-04 Attachment FY2011-68 OPAM More Documents & Publications Flash2011-68 OPAM Policy Flash 2011-73 Attachment FY2011-73...

236

Evaluation of improved technologies for the removal of {sup 90}Sr and {sup 137}Cs from process wastewater and groundwater: FY 1995 status  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A number of new sorbents are currently being developed for the removal of {sup 90}Sr and {sup 137}Cs from contaminated, caustic low-level liquid waste (LLLW). These sorbents are potentially promising for use in the cleanup of contaminated groundwater and process wastewater containing the two radionuclides. The goal of this subtask is to evaluate the new sorbents to determine whether their associated treatment technology is more selective for the decontamination of wastewater streams than that of currently available processes. Activities during fiscal year 1995 have included completing the characterization of the standard treatment technology, ion exchange on chabazite zeolite. Strontium and cesium sorption on sodium-modified zeolite was observed in the presence of elevated concentrations of wastewater components: sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium. The most significant loss of nuclide sorption was noted in the first 0- to 4-meq/L addition of the cations to a wastewater simulant. Radionuclide sorption on the pretreated zeolite was also determined under dynamic flow conditions. Resorcinol-formaldehyde (R-F) resin, which was developed at the Savannah River Site, was selected as the first new sorbent to be evaluated for wastewater treatment. Nuclide sorption on this resin was greater when the resin had been washed with ultrapure water and air dried prior to use.

Bostick, D.T.; Arnold, W.D. Jr.; Burgess, M.W.; McTaggart, D.R.; Taylor, P.A. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Guo, B. [Oak Ridge Research Inst., TN (United States)

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

Appraisal Seattle, Renton and Southern Railway Company  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

a i l as 30# , 3 5 # t 5 0 # , 55# , 56# , 6 0 # , 72# and 80# , w h i l e some s p e c i a l work i s 90# . T h e r e may be no 55# r a i l a t a l l and t h e r e may be some 40# r a i l . I f a l l o f t h e 55# were cha r g ed t o 5 6 # , o n... Libraries’ Center for Digital Scholarship. http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu A Civil Engineering thesis of the University of Kansas APPRAISAL BEUTLE REHTON M D SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY i l O C ^ I I N D E X L e t t e r o f T r a n s m i t t a l , H i s t o...

Fletcher, John H.

1913-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

238

Fuel Cell Technologies Program FY 2013 Budget Request Rollout...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

FY 2013 Budget Request Rollout Washington, DC FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM FY 2013 Budget Request Rollout to Stakeholders Sunita Satyapal U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell...

239

Recommendation 224: Recommendations on the FY 2016 DOE Oak Ridge...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Recommendation 224: Recommendations on the FY 2016 DOE Oak Ridge Environmental Management Budget Request Recommendation 224: Recommendations on the FY 2016 DOE Oak Ridge...

240

FY 2014 Environmental Management Budget Request to Congress ...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

4 Environmental Management Budget Request to Congress FY 2014 Environmental Management Budget Request to Congress Department of Energy - Environmental Management FY 2014...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

FY 2014 Budget Request Summary Table | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Summary Table FY 2014 Budget Request Summary Table Summary Table by Appropriations Summary Table by Organization More Documents & Publications FY 2014 Budget Request Statistical...

242

FY 2014 Federal Real Property Reporting Requirement | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Federal Real Property Reporting Requirement FY 2014 Federal Real Property Reporting Requirement FIMS FRPP FY 2014 Reporting Instructions Signed Sep 18 2014 .pdf More Documents &...

243

Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY1999 Grant Descriptio...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY1999 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY1999 Grant Descriptions and Contact...

244

HSI_Annual_Report_FY2010.pdf | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

HSIAnnualReportFY2010.pdf More Documents & Publications TCUReportFY2010.pdf Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training Grant Program (TAACCCT)...

245

FY 2011 OIG Recovery Act Plan Overview | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY 2011 OIG Recovery Act Plan Overview FY 2011 OIG Recovery Act Plan Overview The primary objective of the Office of Inspector General's oversight strategy involves the...

246

State Energy Program Formula Grant Allocations - FY 2008 | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

State Energy Program Formula Grant Allocations - FY 2008 State Energy Program Formula Grant Allocations - FY 2008 U.S. Department of Energy State Energy Program (SEP) Formula Grant...

247

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FY 2015 Budget...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

About Us Budget Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FY 2015 Budget Request Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FY 2015 Budget Request U.S....

248

Project Impact Assessments: Building America FY14 Field Test...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Project Impact Assessments: Building America FY14 Field Test Technical Support - 2014 BTO Peer Review Project Impact Assessments: Building America FY14 Field Test Technical Support...

249

Attachment FY2011-25 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

OPAM Attachment FY2011-25 OPAM Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance Attachment FY2011-25 OPAM More Documents & Publications Chapter 23 -...

250

Highlights of the FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request for OE...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

for OE Highlights of the FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request for OE The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's FY 2013 budget request continues the commitment...

251

Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability FY 2012 Budget...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability FY 2012 Budget Request Presentation Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability FY 2012 Budget Request Presentation...

252

Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies FY 2014 Budget Request Rollout...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies FY 2014 Budget Request Rollout to Stakeholders Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies FY 2014 Budget Request Rollout to Stakeholders Presentation...

253

FY 2003 Progress Report for Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY 2003 Progress Report for Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program FY 2003 Progress Report for Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program...

254

Fuel Cells for Transportation - FY 2001 Progress Report | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Fuel Cells for Transportation - FY 2001 Progress Report Fuel Cells for Transportation - FY 2001 Progress Report V. PEM STACK COMPONENT COST REDUCTION 159.pdf More Documents &...

255

FY 2009 LDRD Report to Congress  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LDRD Report to Congress LDRD Report to Congress Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2009 Laboratory Directed Research and Development at the DOE National Laboratories Report to Congress April 2010 FY 2009 LDRD Report to Congress Department of Energy Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Table 1. LDRD, PDRD and SDRD Breakdown 1 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Background 2 1.2 Purpose of the Report 2 2. FY 2009 LDRD Program 3 2.1 Financial Information 3 2.1.1 LDRD Funding Mechanism 3 2.1.2 FY 2009 Expenditures 3 Table 2. Laboratory Costs and LDRD Costs 4

256

EM Quality Assurance Assessment Schedule FY 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Attached for planning and coordination purposes is the updated Quality Assurance (QA) assessment schedule for the remainder of fiscal year (FY) 2010.

257

SES Performance Cycle- Aggregate Results FY 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The memorandum releases the FY 2013 aggregate results for the Department's Senior Executive Service members and provides a summary of past results.

258

FY 2009 Progress Report for Lightweighting Materials  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The FY 2009 Progress Report for Lightweighting Materials focuses on the development and validation of advanced materials and manufacturing technologies, to significantly reduce automotive vehicle...

259

NREL Photovoltaic Program FY 1994 bibliography  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report lists all published documents of the Photovoltaic Program for FY 1994. Documents include conference papers, journal articles, book chapters, patents, etc.

none,

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

260

Advanced Fuels Campaign FY 2011 Accomplishments Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

One of the major research and development (R&D) areas under the Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD) program is advanced fuels development. The Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) has the responsibility to develop advanced fuel technologies for the Department of Energy (DOE) using a science-based approach focusing on developing a microstructural understanding of nuclear fuels and materials. Accomplishments made during fiscal year (FY 20) 2011 are highlighted in this report, which focuses on completed work and results. The process details leading up to the results are not included; however, the technical contact is provided for each section. The order of the accomplishments in this report is consistent with the AFC work breakdown structure (WBS).

Not Listed

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Environmental research program: FY 1987, annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This multidisciplinary research program includes fundamental and applied research in physics, chemistry, engineering, and biology, as well as research on the development of advanced methods of measurement and analysis. The Program's Annual Report contains summaries of research performed during FY 1987 in the areas of atmospheric aerosols, flue gas chemistry, combustion, membrane bioenergetics, and analytical chemistry. The main research interests of the Atmospheric Aerosol Research group concern the chemical and physical processes that occur in haze, clouds, and fogs. For their studies, the group is developing novel analytical and research methods for characterizing aerosol species. Aerosol research is performed in the laboratory and in the field. Studies of smoke emissions from fires and their possible effects on climatic change, especially as related to nuclear winter, are an example of the collaboration between the Atmospheric Aerosol Research and Combustion Research Groups.

Not Available

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

The FY 2005 Budget Request  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 Budget Request 5 Budget Request Building on a Record of Success February 2, 2004 David Garman Assistant Secretary Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Building on a Record of Success Meeting Presidential Priorities Citizen Centered Affordable Energy Energy Security Climate Change Building on a Record of Success FY 2005 Budget Request * Supports Presidential commitment to strengthen energy security and enhance energy choices for all Americans while protecting the environment * Maintains FY 2004 request levels in budget constrained year * Builds upon and sustains a record of success * Research & Development (R&D) * Deployment * Management Building on a Record of Success Still EERE's Request Is ^ Priority Driven 1. Dramatically reduce or even end dependence on foreign oil

263

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Fourth Quarter FY 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 1 6 1 Fourth Quarter FY 2006 December 1, 2006; Issue No. 49 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A (continued on page 6) Scoping Process Underway for Two Yucca Mountain EISs The Department of Energy (DOE) recently initiated public scoping for two EISs related to Yucca Mountain, the Nation's proposed repository for disposal of commercial

264

FY15 Phase I Release 2 FOA Webinar  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Join the DOE SBIR/STTR Programs Director, Manny Oliver as he provides a 45 minute overview of: the Federal SBIR/STTR Programs, the DOE SBIR/STTR Technology Areas, and the DOE SBIR/STTR Application and Award Process as it relates to the FY15 Phase I Release 2 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA). The webinar will conclude with a 45 minute Q&A using your questions submitted at registration and during the webinar.

265

Environmental Restoration Projects FY10 Performance  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Pollution Prevention Safety Performance Looking forward: FY11 Goals and Objectives 2 #12;3 FY Planning Plan (Dec) #12;7 ERP Environmental Aspects Radioactive, Hazardous, Mixed & Regulated Industrial Waste Generation Historical Contamination Atmospheric Discharges Liquid Discharges Storage or Use of Chemicals

Homes, Christopher C.

266

Accelerator/Experiment operations - FY 2004  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Technical Memorandum (TM) summarizes the accelerator and experiment operations for FY 2004. It is one of a series of annual publications intended to gather information in one place. In this case, the information concerns the FY 2004 Run II at the Tevatron Collider, the MiniBooNE neutrino experiment, and SY 120 activities.

Bromberg, C.; Conrad, J.; Denisov, D.; Holmes, S.; Louis, W.; Meyer, A.; Moore, Craig D.; Raja, R.; Ramberg, E.; Roser, R.; /Fermilab

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

Microsoft PowerPoint - FY09_10 Validations_Archiving_090804 ...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

PowerPoint - FY0910 ValidationsArchiving090804 More Documents & Publications FIMS Data Validation Schedule FY 2010090729.xls Slide 1 FY2012 Three Year Rolling Timeline...

268

FY 2014 Budget Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Table showing the FY 2012 Current Appropriation, the FY 2013 Annualized Continuing Resolution, and the FY 2014 Congressional Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.

269

Use of sustainability appraisal by English planning inspectors and judges  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This article considers how sustainability appraisals (SA - an English form of SEA that also considers social and economic issues) are treated at the end of the plan-making process: by planning inspectors who review plans before they are adopted, and by judges in the case of legal challenge to plans and their SAs. It briefly describes the role of inspectors and judges, and how their decisions influence SA. It presents the conclusions of 81 planning inspectors' reports about local authority development plans and their SAs, including three cases where inspectors required further SA information and reasons given by inspectors for not challenging the legal adequacy of other SAs. The three main successful English legal challenges to SA are then summarised. Planning inspectors seemed prone, until recently, to not challenge even quite poor quality SAs. This seems to be changing in the wake of recent court judgements, and in turn is affecting planners' SA practice. However it is unclear whether these changes will affect only the procedural aspects of SA or also planners' and inspectors' 'hearts and minds'. - Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Inspectors tend to err in favour of the submitted plan, even where its sustainability or the quality of its SA is dubious. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer In contrast to inspectors, judges seem to be taking a broad and rigorous view of SEA requirements. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Planners and inspectors are changing their behaviour to avoid legal challenge.

Therivel, Riki, E-mail: riki@levett-therivel.co.uk

2013-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

270

Director's Discretionary Research and Development Program, Annual Report FY 2007  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Director's Discretionary Research and Development Program, Annual Report FY 2007 May 2007 Final Draft.

271

FY 2009 Appropriations for the National Science Foundation (NSF) http://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy2009/toc.jsp  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

/25/09) Senate (Comm. Mark) Final % change FY08 vs. FY09 Research & Related Activities: Biological Sciences 612;Education and Human Resources: Program FY 2008 Estimate FY 2009 Request % change FY08 vs. FY09 Request Final. · The proposed CR will run through March 6 signaling that there will be no lame duck session after the election

272

FY 2006 Control Table by Appropriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appropriation Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply.......................................................................... 794,897 932,319 902,674 -29,645 -3.2% Non-Defense site acceleration completion............................... 167,272 157,316 172,400 15,084 +9.6% Uranium enrichment D&D fund................................................ 414,027 495,015 591,498 96,483 +19.5% Non-Defense environmental services...................................... 307,795 288,966 177,534 -111,432 -38.6% Science.................................................................................... 3,536,373 3,599,546 3,462,718 -136,828 -3.8%

273

FY 2006 Summary Table by Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget by Organization Budget by Organization (discretionary dollars in thousands) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons............................................................... 6,447,159 6,583,350 6,630,133 +46,783 +0.7% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.......................... 1,367,709 1,422,103 1,637,239 +215,136 +15.1% Naval Reactors...................................................... 761,872 801,437 786,000 -15,437 -1.9% Office of the Administrator..................................... 352,949 357,051 343,869 -13,182 -3.7% Other Defense Activities......................................... -446 -- -- -- -- Total, National Nuclear Security Administration......... 8,929,243 9,163,941 9,397,241 +233,300 +2.5%

274

Sandia National Laboratories Advanced Simulation and Computing (ASC) : appraisal method for the implementation of the ASC software quality engineering practices: Version 1.0.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides a guide to the process of conducting software appraisals under the Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) ASC Program. The goal of this document is to describe a common methodology for planning, conducting, and reporting results of software appraisals thereby enabling: development of an objective baseline on implementation of the software quality engineering (SQE) practices identified in the ASC Software Quality Plan across the ASC Program; feedback from project teams on SQE opportunities for improvement; identification of strengths and opportunities for improvement for individual project teams; guidance to the ASC Program on the focus of future SQE activities Document contents include process descriptions, templates to promote consistent conduct of appraisals, and an explanation of the relationship of this procedure to the SNL ASC software program.

Turgeon, Jennifer; Minana, Molly A.

2008-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

FY 2015 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Funding Opportunity Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) » FY 2015 Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) SBIR/STTR Home About Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) FY 2006-2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Applicant and Awardee Resources Commercialization Assistance Other Resources Awards SBIR/STTR Highlights Reporting Fraud Contact Information Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer U.S. Department of Energy SC-29/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-5707 F: (301) 903-5488 E: sbir-sttr@science.doe.gov More Information » Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) FY 2015 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Fiscal Year: FY06-12, FY13, FY14, FY15 Phase I

276

BIM extension for the sustainability appraisal of conceptual steel design  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Contemporary advancements in Information Technology and the efforts from various research initiatives in the AEC industry are showing evidence of progress with the emergence of building information modelling (BIM). BIM presents the opportunity of electronically modelling and managing the vast amount of information embedded in a building project, from its conception to end-of-life. Researchers have been looking at extensions to expand its scope. Sustainability is one such modelling extension that is in need of development. This is becoming pertinent for the structural engineer as recent design criteria have put great emphasis on the sustainability credentials in addition to the traditional criteria of structural integrity, constructability and cost. With the complexity of designs, there are now needs to provide decision support tools to aid in the assessment of the sustainability credentials of design solutions. Such tools would be most beneficial at the conceptual design stage so that sustainability is built into the design solution starting from its inception. The sustainability of buildings is related to life cycle and is measured using indicator-terms such as life cycle costing, ecological footprint and carbon footprint. This paper proposes a modelling framework combining these three indicators in providing sustainability assessments of alternative design solutions based on the economic and environmental sustainability pillars. It employs the principles of feature-based modelling to extract construction-specific information from product models for the purposes of sustainability analysis. A prototype system is implemented using .NET and linked to the BIM enabled software, Revit Structures™. The system appraises alternative design solutions using multi-criteria performance analysis. This work demonstrates that current process and data modelling techniques can be employed to model sustainability related information to inform decisions right from the early stages of structural design. It concludes that the utilized information modelling representations – in the form of a process model, implementation algorithms and object-based instantiations – can capture sustainability related information to inform decisions at the early stages of the structural design process.

Akponanabofa Henry Oti; Walid Tizani

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

277

DOE and The Appraisal Foundation Announce New Partnership to Focus on  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

The Appraisal Foundation Announce New Partnership to Focus The Appraisal Foundation Announce New Partnership to Focus on Energy Performance and Building Appraisals DOE and The Appraisal Foundation Announce New Partnership to Focus on Energy Performance and Building Appraisals June 13, 2011 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - As part of the Obama Administration's efforts to improve commercial building efficiency 20 percent by 2020, U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu today announced a partnership with The Appraisal Foundation that will help expand access to energy efficiency and building performance information for commercial buildings and help American businesses to reduce energy waste. Under the new partnership, the Department of Energy and The Appraisal Foundation will work to ensure that appraisers nationwide have

278

FY 2012 Agency Financial Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

in order to provide performance, financial in order to provide performance, financial and related information in a more meaningful and useful format. The Department of Energy (Department or DOE), has chosen an alternative reporting to the consolidated Performance and Accountability Report and instead, produces an Agency Financial Report, an Annual Performance Report and a Summary of Performance and Financial Information, pursuant to the OMB Circular A-136. This reporting approach simplifies and streamlines the performance presentations while utilizing the Internet for providing and leveraging additional performance information. The Department's fiscal year (FY) 2012 reporting includes the following three components and will be available at the website below, as each component

279

Fuel Cells for Transportation FY 2001 Progress Report V. PEM STACK COMPONENT COST REDUCTION1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Fuel Cells for Transportation FY 2001 Progress Report 113 V. PEM STACK COMPONENT COST REDUCTION1 A. High-Performance, Matching PEM Fuel Cell Components and Integrated Pilot Manufacturing Processes Mark K polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell components and pilot manufacturing processes to facilitate

280

Non-Contact Sensor Evaluation for Bipolar Plate Manufacturing Process Control and Smart Assembly of Fuel Cell Stacks - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Eric Stanfield National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Dr., MS 8211-8211 Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Phone: (301) 975-4882 Email: eric.stanfield@nist.gov DOE Managers HQ: Nancy Garland Phone: (202) 586-5673 Email: Nancy.Garland@ee.doe.gov GO: Jesse Adams Phone: (720) 356-1421 Email: Jesse.Adams@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0001047 Project Start Date: October 1, 2009

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

FY95 capital asset implementation plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Waste Isolation Division (WID) is committed to providing good stewardship for the capital assets under its operational and physical control. To achieve this goal, the WID has developed the Capital Asset Implementation Plan (CAIP) to continue to implement for FY95 Department of Energy (DOE) Order 4320.2A, Capital Asset Management Process (CAMP). The Order provides policy and elements needed to establish a credible, consistent, auditable, and technically sound process for the DOE to forecast, plan, and budget for capital assets on a functional unit level. The objective of the WIPP CAMP program is to meet the goals of DOE Order 4320.2A in the most effective and efficient manner possible in support of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) mission. As a result, this CAIP provides a way to implement the CAMP Program using a graded approach. Continued implementation will be accomplished by improving the existing process, and establishing future goals to promote growth for the CAMP Program. The CAIP is issued annually by the WID with quarterly progress reports submitted to the DOE. This document describes the current-year program staffing, roles, responsibilities, funding, and near-term milestones. In addition, the results of past goals are discussed.

Not Available

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

Pre-Investigation Geological Appraisal Of Geothermal Fields | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Pre-Investigation Geological Appraisal Of Geothermal Fields Pre-Investigation Geological Appraisal Of Geothermal Fields Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Journal Article: Pre-Investigation Geological Appraisal Of Geothermal Fields Details Activities (2) Areas (1) Regions (0) Abstract: In recent years there has been interest in the possibility of generating electricity from geothermal steam in many countries. The initial stage is the preliminary evaluation of geothermal resources and, apart from economic considerations, the problem is essentially geological. This paper deals with the factors involved in the selection of areas that warrant expenditure on investigation and development. Preferred requirements in geothermal fields for power generation are temperatures above 200°C and permeable aquifers or zones within 2000 m from the surface. The existence

283

FY 2010 BUDGET  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION BOULDER CANYON PROJECT E&OC Meeting January 18, 2012 Administrative Update BCP Rate Process Update Renewable Update Budget/Finance Report Construction Report 1 Western Area Power Administration 1/18/2012 2 Presented by: Debby Emler Desert Southwest Region January 18, 2012 Western Area Power Administration 1/18/2012 Compliance Update  WAPA-DSW registered as: * BA (Balancing Authority) * TO (Transmission Owner) * TOP (Transmission Operator) * TP (Transmission Planner) * TSP (Transmission Service Provider) * LSE (Load Serving Entity) * PA (Planning Authority) 3 Western Area Power Administration 1/18/2012 Compliance Update  Southern California Disturbance Events Analysis: Data Requests  DSW/RMR Self-Certification: Plan to complete EOM Jan 2012

284

PADS FY 2010 Annual Reports  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

A00 - SMALL BUSINESS 1,890 1,921,241,548 A00 - SMALL BUSINESS 1,890 1,921,241,548 B22 - LARGE BUSINESS 979 2,388,060,659 C0F - FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 478 388,669,688 C0L - LOCAL GOVT/MUNICIPALITY 2 125,000 C3N - NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION 24 282,357,286 C4N - SHELTERED WORKSHOP 1 831,263 E1N - FOREIGN CONTRACTOR 1 -16,921,324 I0E - EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION 9 4,970,555 8 UNIQUE VALUES 3,384 4,969,334,675 Geographic Distribution of FY 2010 Obligations to Non-Facilities Management Awards STATE NUMBER OF AWARDS FY 2010 OBLIGATIONS ALABAMA (AL) 12 2,445,191 ALASKA (AK) 5 3,073,629 ARIZONA (AZ) 96 8,732,671 ARKANSAS (AR) 17 3,142,515 CALIFORNIA (CA) 174 102,574,020 COLORADO (CO) 233 155,184,318 CONNECTICUT (CT) 24 3,663,352 DELAWARE (DE) 3 136,752 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (DC) 770 524,559,400

285

Explosion and combustion processes associated with the fogging of stored potatoes  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

An appraisal was undertaken of the key factors involved in explosion and combustion processes mainly associated with the fogging of chlorpropham...

H. J. Duncan

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

286

FY 2010 Service Contract Inventory Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 Service Contract Inventory Analysis 0 Service Contract Inventory Analysis Department of Energy Office of Procurement & Assistance Management Strategic Programs Division (MA-622) January 2012 (REVISED) FY2010 Service Contract Inventory Analysis Department of Energy Contents Page Section 1: Background 1 Section 2: Analysis and Findings 3 Section 3: Next Steps 5 FY2010 Service Contract Inventory Analysis Department of Energy 1 Section 1: Background Section 743 of Division C of the FY 2010 Consolidated Appropriations Act, P.L. 111-117, requires civilian agencies to prepare an annual inventory of their service contracts. The Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) November 5, 2010 and December 19, 2012 Memorandums entitled, "Service Contract

287

FY 2013 Control Table by Appropriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary Control Table by Appropriation Summary Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Current Enacted Congressional Approp. Approp. * Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy......................................... 1,771,721 1,809,638 2,337,000 +527,362 +29.1% Electricity delivery and energy reliability.......................................... 138,170 139,103 143,015 +3,912 +2.8% Nuclear energy................................................................................ 717,817 765,391 770,445 +5,054 +0.7% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology..................................................................

288

FY 2005 Summary Table by Appropriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OMB Scoring) OMB Scoring) FY 2003 Comparable Approp FY 2004 Comparable Approp FY 2005 Congress Request Energy and Water Development Energy Programs Energy supply.............................................................. 730,215 788,620 835,266 +46,646 +5.9% Non-Defense site acceleration completion.................... 156,129 162,411 151,850 -10,561 -6.5% Uranium enrichment D&D fund.................................... 320,563 414,027 500,200 +86,173 +20.8% Non-Defense environmental services........................... 161,852 306,439 291,296 -15,143 -4.9% Science....................................................................... 3,322,244 3,500,169

289

FY 2009 Control Table by Appropriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Control Table by Appropriation Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Current Current Congressional Op. Plan Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy.......................... -- 1,722,407 1,255,393 -467,014 -27.1% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................... -- 138,556 134,000 -4,556 -3.3% Nuclear energy.................................................................. -- 961,665 853,644 -108,021 -11.2% Legacy management........................................................ -- 33,872 -- -33,872 -100.0% Energy supply and Conservation...................................... 2,145,149 -- -- -- -- Fossil energy programs

290

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 October 1, 2013 - 2:09pm Addthis ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 In 2013 the program operated above the 6 year average and 6 year high, and participation increased by adding 13 new program locations. Southeastern Power Administration and its partners conducted 32 training events which directly impacted 855 trainees, and our outreach efforts promoted energy efficiency and renewable energy to an estimated 3505

291

FY 2013 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

13 13 Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) SBIR/STTR Home About Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) FY 2006-2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Applicant and Awardee Resources Commercialization Assistance Other Resources Awards SBIR/STTR Highlights Reporting Fraud Contact Information Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer U.S. Department of Energy SC-29/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-5707 F: (301) 903-5488 E: sbir-sttr@science.doe.gov More Information » Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) FY 2013 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Fiscal Year: FY06-12, FY13, FY14, FY15 Phase I Release 1 FOA CLOSED Release 2 FOA CLOSED Topics Issued Monday, July 16, 2012 Monday, October 29, 2012

292

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 October 1, 2013 - 2:09pm Addthis ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 In 2013 the program operated above the 6 year average and 6 year high, and participation increased by adding 13 new program locations. Southeastern Power Administration and its partners conducted 32 training events which directly impacted 855 trainees, and our outreach efforts promoted energy efficiency and renewable energy to an estimated 3505

293

Annual work plan for FY 1990  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has an overall mission to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and mismanagement in Department of Energy (DOE) programs. As part of its responsibility in accomplishing its mission, the DOE Office of Audits publishes an Annual Work Plan'' in September of each year. The prime focus of the plan is to identify opportunities for audits to enhance the effectiveness, efficiency, and integrity of the DOE's programs and operations. Through this plan, we are able to maximize the effectiveness of our resources and to avoid duplicating audit coverage being provided by other audit groups, such as the US General Accounting Office (GAO) to US Department of Energy programs. Such planning is required by Office of Management and Budget Circular A-73 and DOE Order 2321.1. This work plan, in an effort to more realistically plan the year ahead, moves away from the traditional listing of all audits to be undertaken for the year. Only those audits that are to be carried over from the previous fiscal year and those that are to be started in the first quarter of the new fiscal year will be listed. The balance of time available has been allocated to the major program areas for FY 1990, and new audits will be identified and started during the year based on the knowledge gained from completed or in-process audits. This process represents the beginning of our use of long-term multi-year program strategies.

Not Available

1989-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

294

Economic feasibility of biochemical processes for the upgrading of crudes and the removal of sulfur, nitrogen, and trace metals from crude oil -- Benchmark cost establishment of biochemical processes on the basis of conventional downstream technologies. Final report FY95  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During the past several years, a considerable amount of work has been carried out showing that microbially enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) is promising and the resulting biotechnology may be deliverable. At Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), systematic studies have been conducted which dealt with the effects of thermophilic and thermoadapted bacteria on the chemical and physical properties of selected types of crude oils at elevated temperatures and pressures. Current studies indicate that during the biotreatment several chemical and physical properties of crude oils are affected. The oils are (1) emulsified; (2) acidified; (3) there is a qualitative and quantitative change in light and heavy fractions of the crudes; (4) there are chemical changes in fractions containing sulfur compounds; (5) there is an apparent reduction in the concentration of trace metals; and (6) the qualitative and quantitative changes appear to be microbial species dependent; and (7) there is a distinction between biodegraded and biotreated oils. The downstream biotechnological crude oil processing research performed thus far is of laboratory scale and has focused on demonstrating the technical feasibility of downstream processing with different types of biocatalysts under a variety of processing conditions. Quantitative economic analysis is the topic of the present project which investigates the economic feasibility of the various biochemical downstream processes which hold promise in upgrading of heavy crudes, such as those found in California, e.g., Monterey-type, Midway Sunset, Honda crudes, and others.

Premuzic, E.T.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

FY 2010 Control Table by Appropriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Control Table by Appropriation Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2010 Current Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Recovery Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy.......................................... 1,704,112 2,178,540 16,800,000 2,318,602 +140,062 +6.4% Electricity delivery and energy reliability............................................ 136,170 137,000 4,500,000 208,008 +71,008 +51.8% Nuclear energy................................................................................... 960,903 792,000 -- 761,274 -30,726 -3.9% Legacy management.......................................................................... 33,872 -- -- --

296

Policy Flashes FY 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY 2012 FY 2012 Policy Flashes FY 2012 Archive of Policy Flashes issued in FY 2012. Number Topic 2012-70 Department of Energy Federal Acquisition Regulation Clause Usage Guide 2012-69 DEAR Contract Clause Matrix 2012-68 Political Activity 2012-67 Acquisition Savings Reporting Guidance 2012-66 Attachment to Policy Flash on New Procedures for Submitting Clause or Template Changes 2012-65 Federal Acquisition Circular 61 2012-64 Contract Clause Matrix 2012-63 Update Department of Energy Acquisition Guide Chapter 22.1 Labor Standards 2012-62 Class Deviation DEAR 950.7006/AL 2012-10, Implementation of the Price-Anderson Act of 2005 2012-61 DOE COR Toolkit Recission 2012-60 Acquisition Guide Chapter 13.1, Purchase Card Policy and Operating Procedures 2012-59 Section 311 Revised Template August 2012

297

FY 2012 Control Table by Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Summary Control Table by Organization 2 Summary Control Table by Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 Current Congressional Annualized Congressional Approp. Request CR Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization Department Of Energy By Organization National Nuclear Security Administration Weapons Activities * ............................................................................. 6,386,371 7,008,835 7,008,835 7,629,716 +620,881 +8.9% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation * ...................................................... 2,131,382 2,687,167 2,136,709 2,549,492 -137,675 -5.1% Naval Reactors * ................................................................................... 945,133 1,070,486 945,133 1,153,662 +83,176 +7.8% Office of the Administrator * ................................................................. 410,754 448,267 410,754 450,060

298

FY 2008 LDRD Report to Congress  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 Report to Congress 8 Report to Congress Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) at the DOE National Laboratories (Report also available at http://www.mbe.doe.gov/cf1-2/ldrd.htm) March 2009 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 5 1.1 Background 5 1.2 Purpose of the Report 5 2. FY 2008 LDRD Program 7 2.1 Financial Information 7 2.1.1 LDRD Funding Mechanism 7 2.1.2 FY 2008 Expenditures 7 2.1.3 FY 2008 LDRD Allocation Percentages 8 2.2 Workforce Development 9 2.3 LDRD and the Work for Others (WFO) Program 11 3. FY 2008 PDRD and SDRD Programs 13 3.1 Plant Directed Research and Development Programs 13 3.2 Site Directed Research and Development Program 13

299

FY 2009 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget » FY 2009 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2009 Budget Justification FY 2009 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2009 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

300

FY 2011 Statistical Table by Appropriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Current Current Current Congressional Approp. Recovery Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy........................................... 2,156,865 16,771,907 2,242,500 2,355,473 +112,973 +5.0% Electricity delivery and energy reliability............................................. 134,629 4,495,712 171,982 185,930 +13,948 +8.1% Nuclear energy................................................................................... 791,444 0 786,637 824,052 +37,415 +4.8% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology..................................................................... 0 0 0 0

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

FY 2006 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget » FY 2006 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2006 Budget Justification FY 2006 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2006 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

302

FY 2013 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget » FY 2013 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2013 Budget Justification FY 2013 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2013 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

303

FY 2011 Control Table by Appropriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary Control Table by Appropriation Summary Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Current Current Current Congressional Approp. Recovery Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy........................................... 2,156,865 16,771,907 2,242,500 2,355,473 +112,973 +5.0% Electricity delivery and energy reliability............................................. 134,629 4,495,712 171,982 185,930 +13,948 +8.1% Nuclear energy................................................................................... 791,444 0 786,637 824,052 +37,415 +4.8% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology..................................................................... 0 0 0 0

304

FY 2008 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget » FY 2008 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2008 Budget Justification FY 2008 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2008 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

305

Policy Flashes FY 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Flashes FY 2013 Flashes FY 2013 Policy Flashes FY 2013 The following is a list of Policy Flashes issued by the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy. These files are in PDF (Portable Document Files) format. To read PDF files you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available at no charge from Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/). If you have any questions concerning this list, please contact the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy on (202) 287-1330. If a Policy Flash and/or attachment is in a different format than Adobe Acrobat, the format type will be noted after the number of the Flash. View the archive of Policy Flashes for FY 2012. Number Topic 2013-79 Professional and Consultant service costs (FAR 31.205-33) 2013-78 Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.3 Acquisition Planning in the M&O Enviroment

306

FY 2007 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget » FY 2007 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2007 Budget Justification FY 2007 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2007 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

307

FY 2005 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget » FY 2005 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2005 Budget Justification FY 2005 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2005 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

308

FY 2007 LDRD Report to Congress  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 Report to Congress 7 Report to Congress Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) at the DOE National Laboratories (Report also available at http://www.mbe.doe.gov/cf1-2/ldrd.htm) December 2007 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Purpose of the Report 4 2. FY 2007 LDRD Program 6 2.1 Financial Information 6 2.1.1 LDRD Funding Mechanism 6 2.1.2 FY 2007 Expenditures 6 2.1.3 FY 2007 LDRD Allocation Percentages 7 2.2 Workforce Development 8 2.3 LDRD and the Work for Others (WFO) Program 10 3. FY 2007 PDRD and SDRD Programs 12 3.1 Plant Directed Research and Development Programs 12 3.2 Site Directed Research and Development Program 12

309

FY 2012 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget » FY 2012 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2012 Budget Justification FY 2012 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2012 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

310

FY 2011 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget » FY 2011 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2011 Budget Justification FY 2011 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2011 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

311

FY 2005 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget » FY 2005 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2005 Budget Justification FY 2005 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2005 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

312

FY 2014 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget » FY 2014 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2014 Budget Justification FY 2014 Budget Justification 2014 Funding History with link to the spreadsheet The following documents reflect the FY 2014 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the

313

FY 2010 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget » FY 2010 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2010 Budget Justification FY 2010 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2010 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

314

Annual Report FY2013 URI Foundation Awards  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Annual Report FY2013 Chapter 7 URI Foundation Awards #12;Principal Inves.gator Donor COLLEGE-Ending June 30, 2013 7.1 #12;Principal Inves.gator Donor COLLEGE Project/Research AMOUNT Nedra

Rhode Island, University of

315

EERE FY 2015 Budget Request Webinar-- Transportation  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

EERE FY 2015 Budget Request Webinar, featuring Reuben Sarkar, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Transportation, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, as presented on Thursday, April 3, 2014.

316

FY 2015 Appropriations Hearing | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

the re-solicitation of both terminal contracts at market rates. Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves. The FY 2015 budget requests 19.95 million for the Naval Petroleum and Oil...

317

FY16 Budget Rollout Fact Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Download the fact sheet below to read the full highlights of the President's FY 2016 Budget for the Department of Energy, which provides $30 billion to support the Department in the areas of...

318

What Recession? Alaska's FY 2011 Budget  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

were uncertain. Yet high oil prices and cash reserves madethis reason we focus first upon oil prices and production.Oil Prices Unlike the radical price swings of FY 2009, when

McBeath, Jerry

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

FY 2011 Control Table by Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 Summary Control Table by Organization 1 Summary Control Table by Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Current Current Current Congressional Approp. Recovery Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons................................................................................................. 6,410,000 0 6,384,431 7,008,835 +624,404 +9.8% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation........................................................... 1,545,071 0 2,136,709 2,687,167 +550,458 +25.8% Naval Reactors........................................................................................ 828,054 0 945,133 1,070,486 +125,353 +13.3% Office of the Administrator....................................................................... 439,190 0 410,754 448,267

320

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Progress Report 5 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY1999 Grant Descriptions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY1999 Grant FY1999 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY1999 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Public Benefits and Distributed Generation Outreach Project The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) will hold collaborative workshops with key stakeholders to build consensus on effective policy options for emerging competitive distributed generation markets. FY1999 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information More Documents & Publications Electric Restructuring Outreach Activities and Information Dissemination to State Public Utility Regulators Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY2001 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY2003 Grant Descriptions

322

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Progress Report 6 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on

323

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Progress Report 3 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on AddThis.com...

324

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Progress Report 6 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on AddThis.com...

325

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Progress Report 5 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on AddThis.com...

326

FY 2011 Annual Performance Report | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Report DOE's FY 2011 Annual Performance Report (APR) presents the performance results for fiscal year 2011 that contributed to the achievement of goals identified in the President's fiscal year 2011 budget. The performance measures in this report were initially outlined in the Department's FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request. After final congressional budget negotiations, some performance targets were revised to reflect changes in funding levels in enacted appropriations. DOE's FY 2011 Summary Report provides highlights of key financial and performance information that demonstrates DOE's accountability to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy,

327

Rev. 11/16/09 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE PLAN AND APPRAISAL  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SI-5000C Rev. 11/16/09 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE PLAN AND APPRAISAL MID-CYCLE REVIEW Completion-CYCLE REVIEW (Check appropriate box) Review indicates performance is Successful or better (written narrative and filling out the below boxes are optional). Review indicates performance is Successful; however

328

The FY 2006 Budget Request  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 Budget Request 6 Budget Request David Garman Assistant Secretary Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy February 7, 2005 FY 2006 Budget Request * Supports Presidential commitment to strengthen energy security and enhance energy choices for all Americans while protecting the environment * Builds upon and sustains a record of success ƒ Research & Development (R&D) ƒ Deployment ƒ Management * Continues trend of budget requests in the $1.2 billion range 2 Budget Request is Priority Driven 1. Dramatically reduce or even end dependence on foreign oil 2. Reduce the burden of energy prices on the disadvantaged 3. Increase the viability and deployment of renewable energy technologies 4. Increase the reliability and efficiency of electricity generation and use

329

Characterization of Fuel Cell Materials - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Karren L. More Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) 1 Bethel Valley Rd. Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6064 Phone: (865) 574-7788 Email: morekl1@ornl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Donna Ho Phone: (202) 586-8000 Email: Donna.Ho@ee.doe.gov Contributors: * David Cullen (ORNL) * Miaofang Chi (ORNL) * Kelly Perry (ORNL) Project Start Date: Fiscal Year (FY) Year 1999 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop and/or apply novel preparation, imaging, and * analytical methods to characterize fuel cell materials and architectures in the as-processed (fresh) state, during

330

Advanced Fuels Campaign FY 2010 Accomplishments Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD) Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) Accomplishment Report documents the high-level research and development results achieved in fiscal year 2010. The AFC program has been given responsibility to develop advanced fuel technologies for the Department of Energy (DOE) using a science-based approach focusing on developing a microstructural understanding of nuclear fuels and materials. The science-based approach combines theory, experiments, and multi-scale modeling and simulation aimed at a fundamental understanding of the fuel fabrication processes and fuel and clad performance under irradiation. The scope of the AFC includes evaluation and development of multiple fuel forms to support the three fuel cycle options described in the Sustainable Fuel Cycle Implementation Plan4: Once-Through Cycle, Modified-Open Cycle, and Continuous Recycle. The word “fuel” is used generically to include fuels, targets, and their associated cladding materials. This document includes a brief overview of the management and integration activities; but is primarily focused on the technical accomplishments for FY-10. Each technical section provides a high level overview of the activity, results, technical points of contact, and applicable references.

Lori Braase

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Geothermal Technologies FY14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

GEOTHERMAL TECHNOLOGIES FY14 BUDGET AT-A-GLANCE Geothermal Technologies accelerates the development technologies in pre-commercial stages of development. and deployment of clean, domestic geothermal energy. It supports innovative technologies that reduce both the risks and costs of bringing geothermal power online. As a key component of our clean energy mix, geothermal is a renewable energy that generates power around the clock. What We Do The EERE geothermal technologies portfolio consists of a three-pronged investment approach to facilitate the growth of installed electrical capacity:  Research and Development invests in innovative technologies and techniques to improve the process of identifying, accessing, and developing geothermal

332

Microsoft Word - FY08AnnualReport.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Annual Procurement and Financial Assistance Report for FY 2008 Page 2 of 40 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Summary..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Highlights of Fiscal Year 2008 ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 FY 2008 Obligations to Facilities Management Contracts.........................................................................................................................

333

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY 2004 Financial FY 2004 Financial Awards to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on AddThis.com... Current Opportunities Past Opportunities Recovery Act Selected Awards Requests for Information Related Opportunities Quick Links Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Fuel Cells Technology Validation Manufacturing Codes & Standards Education

334

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY 2008 DOE Vehicle FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on AddThis.com... Publications

335

Building America FY14 Research Projects by Research Team | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Research Projects by Research Team Building America FY14 Research Projects by Research Team This table shows the U.S. Department of Energy Building America FY14 research projects...

336

Recommendation 178: FY 2011 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request ...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

78: FY 2011 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request Recommendation 178: FY 2011 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request At our April 8, 2009, meeting, the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board...

337

Recommendation 209 : FY 2014 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

9 : FY 2014 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request Recommendation 209 : FY 2014 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request At the April 11, 2012, meeting, the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board...

338

Recommendation 216: FY 2015 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request ...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

6: FY 2015 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request Recommendation 216: FY 2015 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request At the May 8, 2013, meeting, the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board...

339

Recommendation 197: FY 2013 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request ...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

7: FY 2013 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request Recommendation 197: FY 2013 DOE Oak Ridge EM Budget Request At the May 26, 2011, meeting, the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board...

340

245NASA FY 2011 Performance and Accountability Report Other Accompanying  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

245NASA FY 2011 Performance and Accountability Report Other Accompanying Information Office of Inspector General Letter on NASA's Top Management and Performance Challenges 247 FY 2011 Inspector General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .267 NASA's Audit Follow-up Program

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

EERE FY 2008-2012 Budget: Weatherization and Intergovernmental...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

EERE FY 2008-2012 Budget: Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program EERE FY 2008-2012 Budget: Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program Proposed five-year plan for the U.S....

342

Attachment FY2011-77 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 OPAM Attachment FY2011-77 OPAM Data Quality Plan Attachment FY2011-77 OPAM More Documents & Publications Policy Flash 2011-77 Attachment 2 Source Selection Guide Source Selection...

343

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FY 2014 Budget...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FY 2014 Budget Rollout Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FY 2014 Budget Rollout U.S. Department of Energy's Office...

344

Sustainable NREL - Site Sustainability Plan FY 2015 (Management Publication)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

NREL's Site Sustainability Plan FY 2015 reports on sustainability plans for the lab for the year 2015 based on Executive Order Goals and provides the status on planned actions cited in the FY 2014 report.

Not Available

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

345

Highlights of the FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request for OE...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Highlights of the FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request for OE The FY 2011 Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) budget request is 185.9 million, 14.0...

346

For-Profit Audit Guidance (FY 2010) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

For-Profit Audit Guidance (FY 2010) For-Profit Audit Guidance (FY 2010) Coverage of Independent Audits of For-Profit Firms Audits for For-Profit Firms FAQ Part I, General Audit...

347

FY 2016 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Program Fund .pdf file (988KB) Funding by Site .pdf file (1.0MB) FY 2016 Energy and Water Development Appropriations House Senate Conference Enacted Bill Report FY 2014-2016...

348

Attachment FY2011-12 | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

12 Attachment FY2011-12 Indirect Cost Rate Administration Attachment FY2011-12 More Documents & Publications AcqGuide42pt1.doc&0; Department of Energy Chapter 42 - Contract...

349

Microsoft Word - FY09AnnualReportv1.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Annual Procurement and Financial Assistance Report for FY 2009 Page 2 of 42 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Summary..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Highlights of Fiscal Year 2009 ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 FY 2009 Obligations to Facilities Management Contracts.........................................................................................................................

350

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter FY 1998  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SEPTEMBER 1998 1 SEPTEMBER 1998 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT DOE NEPA Community to Meet in October For Third Quarter FY 1998 September 1, 1998, Issue No. 16 On October 14 and 15, 1998, the DOE NEPA Community will meet in North Las Vegas, hosted by the Nevada Operations Office at its new Support Facility. The Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance is sponsoring this meeting to improve DOE NEPA performance through sharing of lessons learned and discussion of current issues. Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process The meeting will focus on issues that NEPA Document Managers face daily: What tools and techniques can help

351

HYBRID SULFUR ELECTROLYZER DEVELOPMENT FY09 SECOND QUARTER REPORT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary objective of the DOE-NE Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative (NHI) is to develop the nuclear hydrogen production technologies necessary to produce hydrogen at a cost competitive with other alternative transportation fuels. The focus of the NHI is on thermochemical cycles and high temperature electrolysis that can be powered by heat from high temperature gas reactors. The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) has been tasked with the primary responsibility to perform research and development in order to characterize, evaluate and develop the Hybrid Sulfur (HyS) thermochemical process. This report documents work during the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2009, for the period between January 1, 2009 and March 31, 2009. The HyS Process is a two-step hybrid thermochemical cycle that is part of the 'Sulfur Family' of cycles. As a sulfur cycle, it uses high temperature thermal decomposition of sulfuric acid to produce oxygen and to regenerate the sulfur dioxide reactant. The second step of the process uses a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer (SDE) to split water and produce hydrogen by electrochemically reacting sulfur dioxide with H{sub 2}O. The SDE produces sulfuric acid, which is then sent to the acid decomposer to complete the cycle. The DOE NHI program is developing the acid decomposer at Sandia National Laboratory for application to both the HyS Process and the Sulfur Iodine Cycle. The SDE is being developed at SRNL. During FY05 and FY06, SRNL designed and conducted proof-of-concept testing for a SDE using a low temperature, PEM fuel cell-type design concept. The advantages of this design concept include high electrochemical efficiency, small footprint and potential for low capital cost, characteristics that are crucial for successful implementation on a commercial scale. During FY07, SRNL extended the range of testing of the SDE to higher temperature and pressure, conducted a 100-hour longevity test with a 60-cm{sup 2} single cell electrolyzer, and designed and built a larger, multi-cell stack electrolyzer. During FY08, SRNL continued SDE development, including development and successful testing of a three-cell electrolyzer stack with a rated capacity of 100 liters per hour. The HyS program for FY09 program will address improving SDE performance by focusing on preventing or minimizing sulfur deposition inside the cell caused by SO{sub 2} crossover, reduction of cell voltage for improved efficiency, an extension of cell operating lifetime. During FY09 a baseline technology development program is being conducted to address each of these issues. Button-cell (2-cm{sup 2}) and single cell (60-cm{sup 2}) SDEs will be fabricated and tested. A pressurized button-cell test facility will be designed and constructed to facilitate addition testing. The single cell test facility will be upgraded for unattended operation, and later for operation at higher temperature and pressure. Work will continue on development of the Gas Diffusion Electrode (GDE), or Gap Cell, as an alternative electrolyzer design approach that is being developed under subcontract with industry partner Giner Electrochemical Systems. If successful, it could provide an alternative means of preventing sulfur crossover through the proton exchange membrane, as well as the possibility for higher current density operation based on more rapid mass transfer in a gas-phase anode. Promising cell components will be assembled into membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) and tested in the single cell test facility. Upon modification for unattended operation, test will be conducted for 200 hours or more. Both the button-cell and modified single cell facility will be utilized to demonstrate electrolyzer operation without sulfur build-up limitations, which is a Level 1 Milestone.

Herman, D; David Hobbs, D; Hector Colon-Mercado, H; Timothy Steeper, T; John Steimke, J; Mark Elvington, M

2009-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

352

Advanced Materials and Processing of Composites for High Volume...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

and Processing of Composites for High Volume Applications FY 2009 Progress Report for Lightweighting Materials - 8. Polymer Composites Research and Development Carbon Fiber SMC...

353

Building America FY14 Projects by Building Type  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This table lists U.S. Department of Energy Building America FY14 research projects by building type.

354

SBIR and STTR: Topics, FY 2015 Phase I Release 2  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs: Topics, FY 2015, Phase I, Release 2.

355

FY 2014 Annual Progress Report- Electric Drive Technologies Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FY 2014 Annual Progress Report for the Electric Drive Technologies Program of the Vehicle Technologies Office, DOE/EE-1163

356

Microsoft Word - FY07AnnualReport.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 Annual Report (revised) - 1 - Created on 01/11/2008 7 Annual Report (revised) - 1 - Created on 01/11/2008 PROCUREMENT AND ASSISTANCE DATA SYSTEM (PADS) FISCAL YEAR 2007 ANNUAL REPORTS FY 2007 Obligations to Facilities Management Contracts......................................................................................................................... 2 FY 2007 Non-Facilities Management Awards and Obligations................................................................................................................. 4 FY 2007 Obligations to Non-Facilities Management Awards by Organization Type ............................................................................... 5 Geographic Distribution of FY 2007 Obligations to Non-Facilities Management Awards .......................................................................

357

NREL Energy Storage Projects: FY2013 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In FY13, DOE funded NREL to make technical contributions to various R&D activities. This report summarizes NREL's R&D projects in FY13 in support of the USABC; Battery Testing, Analysis, and Design; ABR; and BATT program elements. The FY13 projects under NREL's Energy Storage R&D program are discussed in depth in this report.

Pesaran, A.; Ban, C.; Brooker, A.; Gonder, J.; Ireland, J.; Keyser, M.; Kim, G. H.; Long, D.; Neubauer, J.; Santhanagopalan, S.; Smith, K.; Tenent, R.; Wood, E.; Han, T.; Hartridge, S.; Shaffer, C. E.

2014-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

358

FY 2007 Miniature Spherical Retroreflectors Final Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Miniature spherical retroreflectors, less than 8 millimeters in diameter, are currently being developed to enhance remote optical detection of nuclear proliferation activities. These retroreflecting spheres resemble small, sand-colored marbles that have the unique optical property of providing a strong reflection directly back to the source (i.e., retroreflecting) when illuminated with a laser. The addition of specific coatings, sensitive to specific chemicals or radioactive decay in the environment, can be applied to the surface of these retroreflectors to provide remote detection of nuclear proliferation activities. The presence of radioactive decay (e.g., alpha, gamma, neutron) or specific chemicals in the environment (e.g., TBP, acids) will change the optical properties of the spheres in a predictable fashion, thus indicating the presence or absence of the target materials. One possible scenario might employ an airborne infrared laser system (e.g., quantum-cascade lasers) to illuminate a section of ground littered with these retroreflective spheres. Depending on the coating and the presence of a specific chemical or radioisotope in the environment, the return signal would be modified in some predictable fashion because of fluorescence, frequency shifting, intensity attenuation/enhancement, or change in polarization. Research conducted in FY 2007 focused on developing novel optical fabrication processes and exploiting the unique material properties of chalcogenide infrared-transparent glass (germanium-arsenic-sulfur-tellurium compounds) to produce highly efficient retroreflectors. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory’s approach provides comparable performance to the ideal graded index sphere concept, developed by R. K. Luneburg in 1944 (Luneburg 1944), while greatly reducing the complexity in fabrication by utilizing chalcogenide glass materials and compression-molding processes.

Anheier, Norman C.; Bernacki, Bruce E.; Krishnaswami, Kannan

2008-02-20T23:59:59.000Z

359

FTCP FY 2011 Operational Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

N N N o o v v e e m m b b e e r r 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 U U . . S S . . D D E E P P A A R R T T M M E E N N T T O O F F E E N N E E R R G G Y Y F F E E D D E E R R A A L L T T E E C C H H N N I I C C A A L L C C A A P P A A B B I I L L I I T T Y Y P P R R O O G G R R A A M M F F Y Y 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 O O P P E E R R A A T T I I O O N N A A L L P P L L A A N N Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2011 Operational Plan November 2010 1 The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The Department has identified guiding principles to accomplish that objective and identified four general functions of the Federal Technical Capability Program. The guiding principles are: ï‚· Federal personnel possess the experience, knowledge, skills, and abilities that are

360

FY 2008 Annual Performance Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hyd Hyd rog en Tan k Res earc h, LLN L PH EN IX Ex pe rim en t, BN L Fu el Ce ll Re sea rch , AN L Ca rb on Se qu es tra tio n Re se ar ch , PN NL Hi gh Ex pl os iv es Ap pl ic at io ns Fa ci lit y, LL NL Com put er Sim ulat ion The ater , LAN L Al ga e Re se ar ch , NR EL Ad va nc ed Bio fue ls Re se arc h, LB NL T ra in in g Nuc lear Mat eria ls Sto rag e, SRS C o a l G a s if ic a ti o n R e s e a rc h , P N N L Cli ma te Mo de lin g, OR NL AnnuAl PerformAnce rePort fY 2008 Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 Performance Summary Scorecard..................................................................................................2 Department Performance ...............................................................................................................4

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

FTCP FY 2009 Operational Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

N N o o v v e e m m b b e e r r 2 2 0 0 0 0 8 8 U U . . S S . . D D E E P P A A R R T T M M E E N N T T O O F F E E N N E E R R G G Y Y F F E E D D E E R R A A L L T T E E C C H H N N I I C C A A L L C C A A P P A A B B I I L L I I T T Y Y P P R R O O G G R R A A M M F F Y Y 2 2 0 0 0 0 9 9 O O P P E E R R A A T T I I O O N N A A L L P P L L A A N N Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2009 Operational Plan November 2008 1 The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The Department has identified guiding principles to accomplish that objective and identified four general functions of the Federal Technical Capability Program. The guiding principles are: * Federal personnel possess the experience, knowledge, skills, and abilities that are

362

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011

363

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010

364

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter FY2009 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010

365

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012

366

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

First Quarter First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012

367

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012

368

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Second Quarter Second Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010

369

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012

370

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012

371

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 09 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010

372

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009

373

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011

374

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010

375

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Second Quarter Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012

376

FY 2007 Control Table by Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Control Table by Organization Control Table by Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons................................................................................. 6,625,542 6,369,597 6,407,889 +38,292 +0.6% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.......................................... 1,507,966 1,614,839 1,726,213 +111,374 +6.9% Naval Reactors........................................................................ 801,437 781,605 795,133 +13,528 +1.7% Office of the Administrator...................................................... 363,350 338,450 386,576 +48,126 +14.2% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration........................ 9,298,295 9,104,491

377

FY 2009 Control Table by Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 Control Table by Organization 9 Control Table by Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Current Current Congressional Op. Plan Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons................................................................................. 6,258,583 6,297,466 6,618,079 +320,613 +5.1% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation........................................... 1,824,202 1,335,996 1,247,048 -88,948 -6.7% Naval Reactors....................................................................... 781,800 774,686 828,054 +53,368 +6.9% Office of the Administrator...................................................... 358,291 402,137 404,081 +1,944 +0.5% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration.......................

378

FY 2011 LDRD Report to Congress  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY 2011 Report to Congress FY 2011 Report to Congress Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) at the DOE National Laboratories For additional information on the Department's Laboratory Directed Research and Development program, please see the Office of Science website: http://science.energy.gov/lpe/laboratory-directed-research-and-development/ or the National Nuclear Security Administration website: http://tri-lab.lanl.gov/ Formally, this Report responds to the Conference Report (H.R. Rep. No. 106-988 (Conf. Rep.)) accompanying the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, which requested the DOE Chief Financial Officer "develop and execute a financial accounting report of LDRD expenditures by laboratory and weapons production plant." It also responds to the National Defense

379

FY 2008 Control Table by Appriopriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Control Table by Appropriation Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Current Congressional Congressional Approp. Request Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and Conservation..................................... 1,812,397 1,923,361 2,187,943 +264,582 +13.8% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology................................................... -20,000 -- -58,000 -58,000 N/A Fossil energy research and development..................... 580,669 469,686 566,801 +97,115 +20.7% Naval petroleum and oil shale reserves........................ 21,285 18,810 17,301 -1,509 -8.0% Elk Hills school lands fund............................................

380

FY 2009 Performance Goals Artificial Retina Project  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY 2009 Performance Goals FY 2009 Performance Goals 2009 Annual Goal: Advance blind patient sight. FY09: Complete in vitro/benchtop development of implantable 200+ electrode prototype. 2009 Annual Goal Met: The bench-top development of an implantable 200+ electrode prototype has been completed. All the components of the 200+ electrode prototype have been integrated and characterized. Performance Goal/Annual Target Quarter Quarter Goal Quarterly Results: Yes or No? 1st Quarter Build electronics module for implantable active A-200+ system Goal Met. The electronics module for an implantable active A-200+ system was assembled and tested. It is a key component required to fabricate the active A-200+ prototype system. 2nd Quarter Complete fabrication of active A - 200+ Prototype system

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

FY 2013 Control Table by Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 Summary Control Table by Organization 3 Summary Control Table by Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Current Enacted Congressional Approp. Approp. * Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization Department Of Energy By Organization National Nuclear Security Administration Weapons Activities.............................................................................. 6,865,775 7,214,120 7,577,341 +363,221 +5.0% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation........................................................ 2,281,371 2,295,880 2,458,631 +162,751 +7.1% Naval Reactors.................................................................................... 985,526 1,080,000 1,088,635 +8,635 +0.8% Office of the Administrator................................................................... 393,293 410,000 411,279

382

FY 2007 Control Table by Appropriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Control Table by Appropriation Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and Conservation......................................... 1,801,815 1,812,627 1,923,361 +110,734 +6.1% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology....................................................... -160,000 -20,000 -- +20,000 +100.0% Fossil energy research and development........................ 560,852 592,014 469,686 -122,328 -20.7% Naval petroleum and oil shale reserves........................... 17,750 21,285 18,810 -2,475 -11.6% Elk Hills school lands fund................................................

383

FY2006SmallBusinessReport.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT TO THE SECRETARY SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2006 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION Page 3 II. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) MISSION Page 3 III. OFFICE of SMALL and DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS UTILIZATION (OSDBU) Page 3 IV. LAWS & REGULATIONS Page 3 V. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BUSINESS MODEL Page 4 A. Facility Management Contractors (FMC) B. Non-FMCs VI. SMALL BUSINESS GOALS Page 5 A. Government Statutory Goals B. FY 2006 DOE Negotiated Goals VII. PRIME CONTRACT SMALL BUSINESS ACHIEVEMENTS Page 7 A. 8(a) and Small & Disadvantaged Business (SDB) B. Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) C. HUBZone Small Business

384

Accelerator/Experiment Operations - FY 2009  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Technical Memorandum (TM) summarizes the Fermilab accelerator and accelerator experiment operations for FY 2009. It is one of a series of annual publications intended to gather information in one place. In this case, the information concerns the FY 2009 Run II at the Tevatron Collider, MINOS using the Main Injector Neutrino Beam (NuMI), the MiniBooNE experiment running in the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB), and the Meson Test Beam (MTest) activities in the 120 GeV external Switchyard beam (SY120). Each section was prepared by the relevant authors, and was somewhat edited for inclusion in this summary.

Andrews, M.N; Appel, J.A.; Brice, S.; Casarsa, M.; Coleman, R.; Denisov, d.; Ginther, G.; Gruenendahl, S.; Holmes, S.; Kissel, W.; Lee, W.M.; /Fermilab

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

FY 2014 Budget Request Now Available | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY 2014 Budget Request Now Available FY 2014 Budget Request Now Available FY 2014 Budget Request Now Available April 10, 2013 - 5:20pm Addthis The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's (OE) FY 2014 budget request represents an increased investment in the continued commitment to help keep America's energy flowing, promote economic prosperity, and move the nation closer to a cleaner and more secure energy future. Highlights of OE's FY2014 budget request, and Assistant Secretary Patricia Hoffman's presentation on the budget request are also available online. For more information, click here. The entire FY 2014 budget request for the Department of Energy is also available online. For highlights of the Department's FY 2014 budget request, read the press release. Addthis Related Articles

386

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Financial Opportunities Financial Opportunities Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on AddThis.com... Current Opportunities Past Opportunities Recovery Act Selected Awards Requests for Information Related Opportunities Quick Links Hydrogen Production

387

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability FY 2010 Budget |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY 2010 FY 2010 Budget Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability FY 2010 Budget The FY 2010 Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) budget request is $208.0 million, $71.0 million more than the FY 2009 Appropriation. This increase reflects increased investments in research and development, particularly in energy storage, smart grid technologies, and cyber security areas. OE will also establish one of the Department's multi-disciplinary Energy Innovation Hubs (Hubs) that specifically focuses on Grid Materials, Devices, and Systems. The FY 2010 budget proposes a budget structure change to better align with the Department's priorities to establish a clean, secure energy future. Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability FY 2010 Budget

388

E-Print Network 3.0 - applying appraisal techniques Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

to ensure that outcomes will meet the three goals, rather... Annandale 2005. Applying sustainability assessment models. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23... Impact...

389

Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced from Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2012  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2 2 May 2013 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced on Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2012 ii This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other federal agencies. May 2013 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced on Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2012 1

390

Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced from Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1 1 March 2012 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced on Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011 i This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. March 2012 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced on Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011 1

391

FY 2008 & FY 2009 Proposed Loan Guarantee Solicitation Implementation Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY 2008 Implementation Plan FY 2008 Implementation Plan Loan Guarantee Program Title XVII, Energy Policy Act of 2005 Prepared pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 Loan Guarantee Program Office Office of the Chief Financial Officer U.S. Department of Energy April 2008 This Loan Guarantee Program Implementation Plan for FY 2008 is being submitted by the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") to the Congressional Appropriations Committees, pursuant to the requirements of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-161 (2007) ("FY 2008 Appropriations Act"). That Act requires DOE to submit to the Congressional Appropriations Committees, at least 45 days prior to "execution of a new solicitation" under the loan guarantee program authorized by Title

392

Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced from Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced from Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011 March 2012 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced on Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011 i This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or

393

FTCP FY 2010 Operational Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

D D D e e c c e e m m b b e e r r 2 2 0 0 0 0 9 9 ( (R Re ev vi is se ed d A Ap pr ri il l 2 20 01 10 0) ) U U . . S S . . D D E E P P A A R R T T M M E E N N T T O O F F E E N N E E R R G G Y Y F F E E D D E E R R A A L L T T E E C C H H N N I I C C A A L L C C A A P P A A B B I I L L I I T T Y Y P P R R O O G G R R A A M M F F Y Y 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 O O P P E E R R A A T T I I O O N N A A L L P P L L A A N N Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2010 Operational Plan December 2009 (Rev 1, April 2010) 1 The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The Department has identified guiding principles to accomplish that objective and identified four general functions of the Federal Technical Capability Program. The guiding principles are:

394

A New Appraisal of Radiation Genetics  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... forty years of its existence, radiation genetics has developed into a vast field with many interrelated, specialist areas devoted to physical, chemical, genetical and cytological analysis of the action ... culminates in the conclusion that "the discovery of the purely material nature of the complex processes of life" is ''one of the major landmarks in the history of dialectical ...

CHARLOTTE AUERBACH

1965-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

395

Twenty-Five Year Site Plan FY2013 - FY2037  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Los Alamos National Laboratory (the Laboratory) is the nation's premier national security science laboratory. Its mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the United States (U.S.) nuclear stockpile; reduce the threat of weapons of mass destruction, proliferation, and terrorism; and solve national problems in defense, energy, and the environment. The fiscal year (FY) 2013-2037 Twenty-Five Year Site Plan (TYSP) is a vital component for planning to meet the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) commitment to ensure the U.S. has a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear deterrent. The Laboratory also uses the TYSP as an integrated planning tool to guide development of an efficient and responsive infrastructure that effectively supports the Laboratory's missions and workforce. Emphasizing the Laboratory's core capabilities, this TYSP reflects the Laboratory's role as a prominent contributor to NNSA missions through its programs and campaigns. The Laboratory is aligned with Nuclear Security Enterprise (NSE) modernization activities outlined in the NNSA Strategic Plan (May 2011) which include: (1) ensuring laboratory plutonium space effectively supports pit manufacturing and enterprise-wide special nuclear materials consolidation; (2) constructing the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Nuclear Facility (CMRR-NF); (3) establishing shared user facilities to more cost effectively manage high-value, experimental, computational and production capabilities; and (4) modernizing enduring facilities while reducing the excess facility footprint. Th is TYSP is viewed by the Laboratory as a vital planning tool to develop an effi cient and responsive infrastructure. Long range facility and infrastructure development planning are critical to assure sustainment and modernization. Out-year re-investment is essential for sustaining existing facilities, and will be re-evaluated on an annual basis. At the same time, major modernization projects will require new line-item funding. This document is, in essence, a roadmap that defines a path forward for the Laboratory to modernize, streamline, consolidate, and sustain its infrastructure to meet its national security mission.

Jones, William H. [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-07-12T23:59:59.000Z

396

Industrial Waste Reduction Program annual report, FY 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy`s Industrial Waste Reduction Program (IWRP) sponsors the development, demonstration, and deployment of technologies that offer a significant opportunity to reduce waste generation, improve productivity, and enhance environmental performance in US industry. The program emphasizes technology-driven solutions that are economically beneficial and environmentally sound. Its goal is to improve the energy efficiency and competitiveness of private industry by cost-effectively reducing waste. Industry, universities, national laboratories and other government agencies are working cooperatively to meet this goal. The IWRP emphasizes the timely commercialization of new technologies that can produce measurable energy, environmental, and economic benefits. All projects are substantially cost-shared with private companies to foster the commercialization process. The program is proud to claim four successfully commercialized technologies that have begun generating benefits. The current IWRP portfolio boasts 32 projects in progress. Funding for the IWRP has grown from $1.7 million in 1990 to $13 million in 1994. New companies join the program each year, reaping the benefits of working cooperatively with government. New technologies are expected to reach commercial success in fiscal year (FY) 1994, further increasing the benefits already accrued. Future Annual Reports will also include projects from the Waste Utilization and Conversion Program. Descriptions of the program`s 32 active projects are organized in this report according these elements. Each project description provides a brief background and the major accomplishments during FY 1993.

Not Available

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

397

Northeast Waste Management Alliance (NEWMA). Annual report FY 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Funding was provided to Brookhaven National Laboratory in the fourth quarter of FY93 to establish a regional alliance as defined by Dr. Clyde Frank during his visit to BNL on March 7, 1993. In collaboration with the Long Island Research Institute (LIRI), BNL developed a business plan for the Northeast Waste Management Alliance (NEWMA). Concurrently, informal discussions were initiated with representatives of the waste management industry, and meetings were held with local and state regulatory and governmental personnel to obtain their enthusiasm and involvement. A subcontract to LIRI was written to enable it to formalize interactions with companies offering new waste management technologies selected for their dual value to the DOE and local governments in the Northeast. LIRI was founded to develop and coordinate economic growth via introduction of new technologies. As a not-for-profit institution it is in an ideal position to manage the development of NEWMA through ready access to venture capital and strong interactions with the business community, universities, and BNL. Another subcontract was written with a professor at SUNY/Stony Brook to perform an evaluation of new pyrolitic processes, some of which may be appropriate for development by NEWMA. Independent endorsement of the business plan recently by another organization, GETF, with broad knowledge of DOE/EM-50 objectives, provides a further incentive for moving rapidly to implement the NEWMA strategy. This report describes progress made during the last quarter of FY93.

Goland, A.N.; Kaplan, E.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

398

FY 2004 LDRD Report to Congress  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 Report to Congress 4 Report to Congress Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) at the DOE National Laboratories December 2004 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction....................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background............................................................................................ 2 1.2 Purpose of the Report............................................................................. 2 2. FY 2004 LDRD Program ............................................................. 4 2.1 Financial Information ........................................................ 4 2.1.1 LDRD Funding Mechanism ................................................. 4

399

Transmutation Fuels Campaign FY-09 Accomplishments Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the fiscal year 2009 (FY-08) accomplishments for the Transmutation Fuels Campaign (TFC). The emphasis is on the accomplishments and relevance of the work. Detailed description of the methods used to achieve the highlighted results and the associated support tasks are not included in this report.

Lori Braase

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

Advanced Energy Projects: FY 1993, Research summaries  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

AEP has been supporting research on novel materials for energy technology, renewable and biodegradable materials, new uses for scientific discoveries, alternate pathways to energy efficiency, alternative energy sources, innovative approaches to waste treatment and reduction, etc. The summaries are grouped according to projects active in FY 1993, Phase I SBIR projects, and Phase II SBIR projects. Investigator and institutional indexes are included.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Technology Transfer Office FY2011 Annual Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technology Transfer Office FY2011 Annual Report #12;TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ADVISORY COMMITTEES The UC San Diego Technology Transfer Advisory Committee (TTAC) is responsible for general oversight of the universityÃ? s technology transfer program. This standing committee is appointed by the chancellor

Hasty, Jeff

402

NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE Annual Report FY 20092010  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

NC STATE NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE Annual Report FY 20092010 In This Report: · Raleigh named top AS AN EMERGING LEADER IN THE FIELD OF NANOTECHNOLOGY." Dr. Gregory Parsons, NC State Nanotechnology Initiative was a period of tremendous growth for nanotechnology activitiesThis past year was a period of tremendous growth

403

Energy Task Force FY11 Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

sulfur B20 (to date approximately 87% transition). In FY 11, these alternative fuel initiatives resulted inventory was updated with data from fiscal years 2008-2009. This continues a series of updates going back to 2001 (for continuous data back to 1990), allowing the University to monitor and assess

New Hampshire, University of

404

FY 2007 Report on Uncosted Balances  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Report on Uncosted Balances Report on Uncosted Balances For Fiscal Year Ended September 30,2007 August 2008 Prepared by: Office of the Chief Financial Officer TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose.. . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . , . . , . , , . . . . , Executive Summary ... . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .... .. .... .... .. Threshold Analysis - Approach and Background ................... . .... .. Composition of FY 2007 Year-End Uncosted Obligations ..... .. . . . . . Explanation of Significant Threshold Variances ... ... .. . . . . . .. . .. .. . . . . . List of Acronyms.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

405

FY 2012 Summary Table by Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 Department of Energy Budget by Organization (discretionary dollars in thousands) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 Current Cong. Annualized Cong. Approp. Request CR Request $ % National Security Weapons Activities* 6,386,371 7,008,835 7,008,835 7,629,716 +620,881 +8.9% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation* 2,131,382 2,687,167 2,136,709 2,549,492 -137,675 -5.1% Naval Reactors* 945,133 1,070,486 945,133 1,153,662 +83,176 +7.8% Office of the Administrator* 410,754 448,267 410,754 450,060 +1,793 +0.4% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration* 9,873,640 11,214,755 10,501,431 11,782,930 +568,175 +5.1% Energy and Environment Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 2,216,392 2,355,473 2,242,500 3,200,053 +983,661 +44.4% Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability 168,484 185,930 171,982 237,717 +69,233 +41.1%

406

Dartmouth Biomedical Libraries FY06 Annual Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Dartmouth Biomedical Libraries FY06 Annual Report September 24, 2006 Dartmouth Biomedical Libraries Usage · D: July 1, 2006, Organization Chart Introduction The mission of the Dartmouth Biomedical (DHMC), and Dartmouth College. There are two Biomedical Libraries: the Dana Biomedical Library

Myers, Lawrence C.

407

Assistant Secretary Rispoli's FY 2009 EM Budget Rollout Presentation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strengthening the Foundation of our Future: Strengthening the Foundation of our Future: Investments to Maximize Risk Reduction Ashtabula 2000 Savannah River Salt Waste Processing Facility Savannah River Salt Waste Processing Facility Project Management Institute Awards Ashtabula 2006 FY 2009 Budget Request Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Construction October 2005 Idaho Sodium Bearing Waste Facility Strengthening the Foundation of our Future: Investments to Maximize Risk Reduction * Reducing risk while maximizing compliance with regulatory commitments Constr cting aste treatment facilities at o r three largest sites to meet o r commitments EM Program Priorities - Constructing waste treatment facilities at our three largest sites to meet our commitments to cleanup tank wastes - Consolidating and preparing for disposal of surplus plutonium and spent nuclear fuel

408

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter FY 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 1999 September 1999 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Third Quarter FY 1999 September 1, 1999; Issue No. 20 Proposed Arizona-Mexico Transmission Project Presents Challenges to NEPA Process and Analysis By: Ellen Russell, NEPA Document Manager, Fossil Energy with Carolyn Osborne, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance continued on page 3 Fossil Energy (FE) is preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS) for what would be the first cross-border high-voltage transmission project to connect the main power delivery systems of the United States and Mexico (DOE/EIS-0307). EIS scoping has been complex. Through the scoping process, FE has identified and worked with many stakeholders to define a broad range

409

FY 2009 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS DEPARTMENTAL AVERAGES BY FISCAL YEAR  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS 9 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS DEPARTMENTAL AVERAGES BY FISCAL YEAR FY 2009 FY2005 FY2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 National Tarpets Customer Perspective Objective: Customer Satisfaction Core Measure: Customer Satisfaction Rating Internal Business Perspective Objective: Effective Internal Controls 93 94 Core Measure: assessment of degree to which purchasing systems are in compliance Objective: Effective Supplier Management 8 1 83 Core Measure: % Delivery on-time, including Just-in-Time Objective: Use of Effective Competition 74 69 Core Measure: % of total dollars obligated on actions over $100,000 that were competed 97 97 N/A - locally set 84 8 6 84 67 74 N/A - locally set 2 FY 2009 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY2009 National Targets

410

FY 2008 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS DEPARTMENTAL AVERAGES BY FISCAL YEAR  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS 8 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS DEPARTMENTAL AVERAGES BY FISCAL YEAR FY 2008 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 National Taraets Customer Perspective Objective: Customer Satisfaction 93 9 3 Core Measure: Customer Satisfaction Rating Internal Business Perspective Objective: Effective Internal Controls 95 93 Core Measure: assessment of degree to which purchasing systems are in compliance Objective: Effective Supplier Management 8 3 8 1 Core Measure: % Delivery on-time, including Just-in-Time Objective: Use of Effective Competition 7 1 74 Core Measure: % of total dollars obligated on actions over $100,000 that were competed N/A - locally set 84 N/A - locally set 2 FY 2008 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY2006 FY 2007 FY2008 National Tarpets

411

FY 2012 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

FY 2012 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D FY 2012 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D FY 2012 annual report of the energy storage research and development...

412

FY 2011 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

FY 2011 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D FY 2011 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D FY 2011 annual report of the energy storage research and development...

413

FY 2012 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2arra.pdf More Documents & Publications FY 2011 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D FY 2011 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D FY 2012 Annual Progress Report...

414

FY 2011 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2arra.pdf More Documents & Publications FY 2012 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D FY 2011 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D FY 2012...

415

Wind and Water Power Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance |...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Wind and Water Power Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance Wind and Water Power Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance Wind and Water Power Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance, a...

416

Microsoft Word - AL-Consolidated Approps FY 2008 as of feb 21...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Consolidated Approps FY 2008 as of feb 21 2008 final.doc Microsoft Word - AL-Consolidated Approps FY 2008 as of feb 21 2008 final.doc Microsoft Word - AL-Consolidated Approps FY...

417

Microsoft Word - AL-Omnibus FY 2009 Apr 22 2009 all sections...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Omnibus FY 2009 Apr 22 2009 all sections.doc Microsoft Word - AL-Omnibus FY 2009 Apr 22 2009 all sections.doc Microsoft Word - AL-Omnibus FY 2009 Apr 22 2009 all sections.doc More...

418

DOE Sustainability Performance Office FY14 Budget At-a-Glance...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DOE Sustainability Performance Office FY14 Budget At-a-Glance DOE Sustainability Performance Office FY14 Budget At-a-Glance DOE Sustainability Performance Office FY14 Budget...

419

Technical Safety Appraisal of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the results of the Technical Safety Appraisal (TSA) of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) (including the Site 300 area), Livermore, California, conducted from February 26 to April 5, 1990. The purpose of the assessment was to provide the Secretary of Energy with the status of Environment, Safety and Health (ES H) Programs at LLNL. LLNL is operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy (DOE), and is a multi-program, mission-oriented institution engaged in fundamental and applied research programs that require a multidisciplinary approach. 1 fig.

Not Available

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

Protocol, ES&H Systems Assessor/Appraiser - October 2003 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ES&H Systems Assessor/Appraiser - October 2003 ES&H Systems Assessor/Appraiser - October 2003 Protocol, ES&H Systems Assessor/Appraiser - October 2003 October 2003 Office Specific Qualification Standard for ES&H Systems Assessor/Appraiser (Rev. 0) The environmental, safety and health systems assessor/appraiser functional area qualification standard establishes common functional area competency requirements for all technical personnel in the Office of Environmental Safety and Health Evaluations. Satisfactory and documented completion of the competency requirements contained in this Standard ensures that technical employees possess the minimum requisite competence to fulfill their functional area duties and responsibilities. This standard is integrated with existing qualification standards developed by DOE in

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Progress Report 4 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004

422

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Progress Report 4 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on

423

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Progress Report 4 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on

424

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Progress Report 3 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on

425

NNSA FY 2013 Budget Request | National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY 2013 Budget Request | National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2013 Budget Request | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Video Gallery > NNSA FY 2013 Budget Request NNSA FY 2013 Budget Request NNSA FY 2013 Budget Request FY 2013 Budget Request Seeks $11.5 Billion to Achieve President Obama's Nuclear Security Objectives, Shape Future of Nuclear Security

426

Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 During Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, we reviewed a variety of critical areas relevant to the Department's mission priorities. One of our goals, for example, was to examine possible programmatic improvements in Department operations relating to cyber security and contract management. Overall, our efforts resulted in the issuance of over 70 audit and inspection reports containing recommendations for enhancing Departmental operations, with likely savings of over $7 million. Further as a result of our investigative efforts, we obtained 20 criminal convictions, recovered $22.8 million in

427

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Progress Report 5 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on

428

FY 2011 Annual Performance Report | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Annual Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Annual Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Report DOE's FY 2011 Annual Performance Report (APR) presents the performance results for fiscal year 2011 that contributed to the achievement of goals identified in the President's fiscal year 2011 budget. The performance measures in this report were initially outlined in the Department's FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request. After final congressional budget negotiations, some performance targets were revised to reflect changes in funding levels in enacted appropriations. DOE's FY 2011 Summary Report provides highlights of key financial and performance information that demonstrates DOE's accountability to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy,

429

Secretary Chu Congratulates FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Secretary Chu Congratulates FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners Secretary Chu Congratulates FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners Secretary Chu Congratulates FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners June 29, 2012 - 2:57pm Addthis Secretary Chu presents the FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners at an award ceremony yesterday at the Energy Department headquarters in Washington, DC. | Energy Department photo. Secretary Chu presents the FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners at an award ceremony yesterday at the Energy Department headquarters in Washington, DC. | Energy Department photo. Dot Harris Dot Harris The Honorable Dot Harris, Director, Office of Economic Impact and Diversity "You are limited only by your imagination, by your courage" Secretary Steven Chu The Energy Department had the pleasure of publicly recognizing the FY 2011

430

FY 2011 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Progress Report for Lightweighting Materials FY 2009 Progress Report for Lightweighting Materials - disclaimer and back cover FY 2012 Annual Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D...

431

E-Print Network 3.0 - application tdea fy Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy 48 Institution: University of Kansas -Lawrence Campus Summary: of Directional Improvement 1. Participation in first-year learning initiatives 1,624 (FY 05) 1. FY...

432

FY 2013 Environmental Management Budget Request to Congress  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 DOE/CF-0075 Volume 5 Environmental Management Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-0075 Volume 5 Environmental Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management Page 1 FY 2013 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Appropriation Language .......................................................................................................................................................... 5

433

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third

434

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First

435

Building Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Building Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance, a publication of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

436

Appliance Standards Program - The FY 2003 Priority Setting Report...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

potential warranting further analysis. It also describes the derivation of energy consumption and saving estimates for those products fy03prioritysettingappa.pdf More...

437

Concurrence' Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory FY2015 Ten...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

manufacturing * Special nuclear materials-plutonium and tritium * High performance computing FY2015 Ten Year Site Plan Limited Report Page 3 of 6 Lawrence Livermore...

438

Advanced Manufacturing Office FY14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Advanced Manufacturing Office FY14 Budget At-a-Glance, a publication of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

439

FY09 WDI PROJECT FUNDING CUNY Unit Project Name  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FY09 WDI PROJECT FUNDING CUNY Unit Project Name International Trade Operation & Procedures Program Simulation Lab College Initiative Bridge Program Workshop Project for Direct Care Workers Green Initiatives

Rosen, Jay

440

FY 2014 Scientific Infrastructure Support for Consolidated Innovative...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

4 Scientific Infrastructure Support for Consolidated Innovative Nuclear Research FOA FY 2014 Scientific Infrastructure Support for Consolidated Innovative Nuclear Research FOA The...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Strategic Programs Office FY14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Strategic Programs Office FY14 Budget At-a-Glance, a publication of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

442

FY 2014 EM Budget Rollout Presentation | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget Rollout Presentation Office of Environmental Management David Huizenga, Senior Advisor for Environmental Management April 10, 2013 View the FY 2014 EM Budget Request to...

443

FY 2013 Budget Request Office of Environmental Management | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Management More Documents & Publications FY 2013 EM Budget Rollout Presentation Senior Advisor Huizenga's Written Statement before the House Energy and Water Development...

444

FY 2015 EM Budget Rollout Presentation | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Budget Rollout Presentation Office of Environmental Management David Huizenga, Senior Advisor for Environmental Management March 4, 2014 EM FY15 Budget Rollout Presentation More...

445

Bioenergy Technologies FY14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Bioenergy Technologies FY14 Budget At-a-Glance, a publication of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

446

FY 2006 Executive Order 13101 Report: Department of Energy Affirmative...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

to the Department's FY 2006 RCRA standard report, affirmative procurement management review protocol, and green purchasing plan. U.S. Department of Energy Affirmative Procurement...

447

Vehicle Technologies FY14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Vehicle Technologies FY14 Budget At-a-Glance, a publication of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

448

FY 2014 Funding History Detail Spreadsheet | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Detail Spreadsheet (3.5 MB) More Documents & Publications Commercial Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Residential Clothes Washers (Appendix J2) FY 2014 Budget Request Statistical...

449

Highlights of the FY 2015 Congressional Budget Request for OE...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Budget Request for OE Highlights of the FY 2015 Congressional Budget Request for OE OE drives electric grid modernization and resiliency in the energy infrastructure through...

450

FY15 OE Budget Request Presentation by Patricia Hoffman | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

of the Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability FY 2014 Budget Request. OE drives electric grid modernization and resiliency in the energy infrastructure through...

451

Geothermal Technologies FY14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Geothermal Technologies FY14 Budget At-a-Glance, a publication of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

452

Solar Energy Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Solar Energy Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance, a publication of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

453

Wind Powering America: FY09 Activities Summary (Book)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Wind Powering America FY09 Activities Summary reflects the accomplishments of state Wind Working Groups, WPA programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and partner organizations.

Not Available

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Weatherization and Intergovernmental FY14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Weatherization and Intergovernmental FY14 Budget At-a-Glance, a publication of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

455

FY 2012 Budget Request Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

April 10, 2013 FY 2014 Budget Request Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability 2 The Importance of a Modern Grid...

456

FY 2012 Budget Request Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

March 4, 2014 FY 2015 Budget Request Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability 2 The Importance of a Modern Grid...

457

FY 2013 Summary Report: Post-Irradiation Examination of Zircaloy...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Examination of Zircaloy-4 Samples in Target Capsules and Initiation of Bending Fatigue Testing for Used Nuclear Fuel Vibration Integrity Investigations FY 2013 Summary Report:...

458

PBL FY 2003 Third Quarter Review Forecast of Generation Accumulated...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

for Financial-Based Cost Recovery Adjustment Clause (FB CRAC) and Safety-Net Cost Recovery Adjustment Clause (SN CRAC) FY 2003 Third Quarter Review Forecast in Millions...

459

PBL FY 2002 Third Quarter Review Forecast of Generation Accumulated...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Power Business Line Generation Accumulated Net Revenues Forecast for Financial-Based Cost Recovery Adjustment Clause (FB CRAC) FY 2002 Third Quarter Review Forecast in Millions...

460

FY 2004 Second Quarter Review Forecast of Generation Accumulated...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

for Financial-Based Cost Recovery Adjustment Clause (FB CRAC) and Safety-Net Cost Recovery Adjustment Clause (SN CRAC) FY 2004 Second Quarter Review Forecast In Millions...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

FY 2015 Argonne Site Sustainability Plan | Argonne National Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY 2015 Argonne Site Sustainability Plan Argonne National Laboratory is committed to reducing its environmental footprint. Our site sustainability goals are in line with U.S....

462

FY 2014 Phase II Release 2+ EERE Awards  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

FY 2014 Phase II Release 2+ EERE Awards, from the U.S. Department of Energy, Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program.

463

FY 2014 Phase I Release 2 EERE Awards  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

FY 2014 Phase I Release 2 EERE Awards, from the U.S. Department of Energy, Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program.

464

Economic Impact of NREL on Colorado, FY2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ENERGY LABORATORY Economic Impact of NREL on Colorado, FY2012 STUDY FUNDED BY: Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC BUSINESS RESEARCH DIVISION Leeds School of Business...

465

FY 2002 Generation Audited Accumulated Net Revenues, February...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 021003 February 2003 Bonneville Power Administration Power Business Line FY 2002 Generation Audited Accumulated Net Revenues for Financial- Based Cost Recovery Adjustment...

466

FY 2003 Generation Audited Accumlated Net Revenues, March 2004  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

March 2004 Bonneville Power Administration Power Business Line FY 2003 Generation (PBL) Audited Accumulated Net Revenues for Financial-Based Cost Recovery Adjustment Clause (FB...

467

Technical safety appraisal of the Nevada Test Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results of one of a series of Technical Safety Appraisals (TSAs) being conducted of Department of Energy (DOE) operations (nuclear and non-nuclear) by the Assistant Secretary of Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H), Office of Safety Appraisals. These TSAs are one of the initiatives announced by the Secretary of Energy on September 18, 1985, to enhance the DOE`s environment, safety, and health program. This TSA report focuses on the safety and health operations of the Nevada Operations Office (NV) at the Nevada Test Site (NTS), which was conducted concurrently, with and supporting a Tiger Team Assessment. The total effort of all the Tiger Team assessment, including environmental and manager evaluations, is reported in the Tiger Team Report, issued January 1990. The assessment of the NTS began November 5, 1989 with the briefing of the Tiger Team in Las Vegas at the Nevada Operations Office. The TSA team evaluation was conducted November 6--17, and November 26--December 1, 1989 at the NTS.

NONE

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

NEPA Lessions Learned Quarterly Report - 4th Quarter FY 1998  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DECEMBER 1998 DECEMBER 1998 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Fourth Quarter FY 1998 December 1, 1998, Issue No. 17 New and Improved NEPA Compliance Guide Issued in 2 Volumes A new and improved DOE NEPA Compliance Guide, issued by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health, has been distributed to about 750 members of the DOE NEPA Community. Intended to foster sound and efficient NEPA compliance, the Compliance Guide is a collection of resources and references to aid in NEPA document preparation and other aspects of the NEPA process. Volume I, General NEPA References, contains the statute, and regulations and guidance from the Council on Environmental Quality, the Department of State, and the

469

FY2000 Progress Report for the Advanced Technology Development Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Advanced Automotive Technologies 1000 Independence Avenue S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585-0121 FY 2000 Progress Report for the Advanced Technology Development Program Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office of Transportation Technologies Office of Advanced Automotive Technologies Energy Management Team Raymond A. Sutula Energy Management Team Leader December 2000 This document highlights work sponsored by agencies of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency, thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference

470

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 1st Quarter FY 1995  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

. . National Environmental Policy Act N E P . A LESSONS Office of NEPA LEARNED QUARTERLY REPORT 1ST QUARTER FY 1995 Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy March 1,1995 ODU- To foster continuing improvement of the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance program, the Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA, issued June 13, 1994, requires the Office of Environment Safety and Health to solicit comments from the NEPA Document Manager, the NEPA Compliance Officer, and team members after completing each environmental impact statement and environmental assessment on lessons learned in the process, and to distribute a quarterly summary to all,NEPA Compliance Officers and NEPA Document Managers. This second quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between October 1 and December 31, 1994. It is based on responses to the revised

471

Technical Direction and Laboratories FY 1999 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report summarize achievements and list reports issued by members of TD&L, NHC group during Fiscal Year (FY) 1999, (October 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999). This report, issued by this organization, describes work in support of the Hanford Site and other U S . Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) programs. It includes information on the organization make-up, interfaces, and mission of the group. The TD&L is a group of highly qualified personnel with diverse disciplines (primarily chemistry specialties) that provide process, analytical, and in-situ chemistry services to engineering customers. This year of operation and interfaces with other contract organizations consumed considerable administrative efforts. Attention was directed to the technical challenges presented by the changing roles, responsibilities, and priorities of Hanford programs.

CRAWFORD, B.A.

2000-09-07T23:59:59.000Z

472

Applied Science Division annual report, Environmental Research Program FY 1983  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary concern of the Environmental Research Program is the understanding of pollutant formation, transport, and transformation and the impacts of pollutants on the environment. These impacts include global, regional, and local effects on the atmosphere and hydrosphere, and on certain aspects of human health. This multidisciplinary research program includes fundamental and applied research in physics, chemistry, engineering, and biology, as well as research on the development of advanced methods of measurement and analysis. During FY 1983, research concentrated on atmospheric physics and chemistry, applied physics and laser spectroscopy, combustion theory and phenomena, environmental effects of oil shale processing, freshwater ecology and acid precipitation, trace element analysis for the investigation of present and historical environmental impacts, and a continuing survey of instrumentation for environmental monitoring.

Cairns, E.J.; Novakov, T.

1984-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

FY 2007 Summary Table by Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 FY 2006 FY 2007 Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons................................................................................ 6,625,542 6,369,597 6,407,889 +38,292 +0.6% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.......................................... 1,507,966 1,614,839 1,726,213 +111,374 +6.9% Naval Reactors....................................................................... 801,437 781,605 795,133 +13,528 +1.7% Office of the Administrator...................................................... 363,350 338,450 386,576 +48,126 +14.2% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration...................... 9,298,295 9,104,491 9,315,811 +211,320 +2.3% Energy, Science and Environment

474

FY2012 EERE Congressional Budget Request  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii The FY 2012 Budget Request February 2011 Henry Kelly Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for EERE 2 | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov "This is our generation's Sputnik moment. We'll invest in ... clean energy technology - an investment that will strengthen our security, protect our planet, and create countless new jobs for our people. Maintaining our leadership in research and technology is crucial to America's success." President Obama State of the Union January 25, 2011 Clean Innovative Energy Solutions Securing America's Future 3 | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov EERE Budget Trend EERE Budget Trend FY 2003 -

475

FY 2009 Summary Table by Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 FY 2008 FY 2009 Current Current Congressional Op. Plan Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons................................................................................. 6,258,583 6,297,466 6,618,079 +320,613 +5.1% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation........................................... 1,824,202 1,335,996 1,247,048 -88,948 -6.7% Naval Reactors....................................................................... 781,800 774,686 828,054 +53,368 +6.9% Office of the Administrator...................................................... 358,291 402,137 404,081 +1,944 +0.5% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration....................... 9,222,876 8,810,285 9,097,262 +286,977 +3.3% Energy and Environment

476

National Energy Technology Laboratory Accomplishments FY 2004  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NETL Accomplishments FY 2004 NETL Accomplishments FY 2004 2 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR It is my pleasure to present the National Energy Technology Laboratory's (NETL's) Accomplishments Report for fiscal year 2004. The report responds to the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 by describing how NETL has spent taxpayer funds. It emphasizes the results of NETL's activities-not the activities themselves. It demonstrates that NETL has upheld the trust of the American taxpayer and has wisely used taxpayer funds to achieve meaningful results that benefit the country. This laboratory has been evolving for nearly 100 years. What was once a small experimental laboratory near downtown Pittsburgh, is now a major research laboratory with facilities in four states-Alaska, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and

477

FY 2005 Progress Report for Fuels Technologies  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Annual Progress Report Progress rePort for fuels technologies Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585-0121 FY 2005 Progress Report for Fuels Technologies Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office of FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Approved by Stephen Goguen January 2006 Fuels Technologies FY 2005 Progress Report Contents I Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 II Fuels and Lubricants to Enable High Efficiency Engine Operation while Meeting 2007 - 2010 Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15

478

FY 2008 Summary Table by Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 FY 2007 FY 2008 Current Congressional Congressional Approp. Request Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons......................................................................... 6,355,297 6,407,889 6,511,312 +103,423 +1.6% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.................................... 1,619,179 1,726,213 1,672,646 -53,567 -3.1% Naval Reactors................................................................ 781,605 795,133 808,219 +13,086 +1.6% Office of the Administrator............................................... 354,223 386,576 394,656 +8,080 +2.1% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration.................. 9,110,304 9,315,811 9,386,833 +71,022 +0.8% Energy and Environment Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy....................

479

ACE Merit Review Report FY2004  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Merit Review and Peer Evaluation of FY 2004 DOE Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL May 18-20, 2004 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Program December 2004 Bringing you a prosperous future where energy is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 13, 2004 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2004 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 18-20, 2004 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were

480

NREL photovoltaic program FY 1997 annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the in-house and subcontracted research and development (R and D) activities under the NREL PV Program from October 1, 1996, through September 30, 1997 (FY 1997). The NREL PV Program is part of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) National Photovoltaics Program, as described in the DOE National Photovoltaics Program Plan for 1996--2000. The FY 1997 budget authority for carrying out the NREL PV Program was $39.3 million in operating funds and $0.4 million in capital equipment funds. Subcontract activities represent a major part of the NREL PV Program, with $21.8 million (55% of PV funds) going to some 84 subcontractors. Cost sharing by industry added almost $8.8 million to the subcontract R and D activities with industry.

McConnell, R.D.; Hansen, A.; Smoller, S.

1998-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appraisal process fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Photovoltaic Program Branch annual report, FY 1989  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the progress of the Photovoltaic (PV) Program Branch of the Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI) from October 1, 1988, through September 30, 1989. The branch is responsible for managing the subcontracted portion of SERI's PV Advanced Research and Development Project. In fiscal year (FY) 1989, this included nearly 50 subcontracts, with a total annualized funding of approximately $13.1 million. Approximately two-thirds of the subcontracts were with universities, at a total funding of nearly $4 million. The six technical sections of the report cover the main areas of the subcontracted program: Amorphous Silicon Research, Polycrystalline Thin Films, Crystalline Silicon Materials Research, High-Efficiency Concepts, New Ideas, and University Participation. Technical summaries of each of the subcontracted programs provide a discussion of approaches, major accomplishments in FY 1989, and future research directions. Each report will be cataloged individually.

Summers, K A [ed.

1990-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

482

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Issue No. 41; Fourth Quarter FY 2004; December 1, 2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 1 4 1 The EIS Comment-Response Process Guidance Issued; see page 9 Putting the Web to Work for NEPA National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Fourth Quarter FY 2004 December 1, 2004; Issue No. 41 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS (continued on page 4) "What's your e-mail address? Do you have a Web site?" These are common questions in

483

NEPA Lessons Learned Second Quarter FY 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 1 6 1 (continued on page 4) Second Quarter FY 2006 June 1, 2006; Issue No. 47 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A Quality + Leadership = NEPA Success NEPA 35 Earns Special Award from NAEP; see page 3 DOE's NEPA Compliance Offi cers discussed quality assurance during the interactive meeting of more than

484

Omega Group Publications FY2007 Forward 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Omega Group Publications FY2007 Forward 1 Omega Group Publications FY2007 Forward 1 Omega Group Publications from FY2007 to May, 2010 1. M. Begel, A. Patwa, M. Pleier, S. Protopopescu, S. Snyder, et al. (D0 Collaboration), Search for Higgs boson production in dilepton and missing energy final states with 5.4 fb-1 of p-pbar collisions at sqrt(s) =1.96 TeV. Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. e-Print: arXiv:1001.4481 [hep-ex] (2010). http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1001/1001.4481v3.pdf 2. M. Begel , A. Patwa, M. Pleier, S. Protopopescu, S. Snyder, et al. (D0 Collaboration), Measurement of Z/gamma*+jet+X angular distributions in p anti-p collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.96.TeV. Phys. Lett. B682 (2010) 370-380. http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0907/0907.4286v2.pdf 3. M. Begel, A. Patwa, M. Pleier, S. Protopopescu, S. Snyder, et al. (D0

485

FY07 Final Report for Calibration Systems  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Remote infrared (IR) sensing provides a valuable method for detection and identification of materials associated with nuclear proliferation. Current challenges for remote sensors include minimizing the size, mass, and power requirements for cheaper, smaller, and more deployable instruments without affecting the measurement performance. One area that is often overlooked is sensor calibration design that is optimized to minimize the cost, size, weight, and power of the payload. Yet, an on-board calibration system is essential to account for changes in the detector response once the instrument has been removed from the laboratory. The Calibration Systems project at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is aimed towards developing and demonstrating compact quantum cascade (QC) laser-based calibration systems for infrared sensor systems in order to provide both a spectral and radiometric calibration while minimizing the impact on the instrument payload. In FY05, PNNL demonstrated a multi-level radiance scheme that provides six radiance levels for an enhanced linearity check compared to the currently accepted two-point scheme. PNNL began testing the repeatability of this scheme using a cryogenically cooled, single-mode quantum cascade laser (QCL). A cyclic variation in the power was observed that was attributed to the thermal cycling of the laser's dewar. In FY06, PNNL continued testing this scheme and installed an auxiliary liquid nitrogen reservoir to limit the thermal cycling effects. Although better repeatability was achieved over a longer time period, power fluctuations were still observed due to the thermal cycling. Due to the limitations with the cryogenic system, PNNL began testing Fabry-Perot QCLs that operate continuous-wave (cw) or quasi-cw at room temperature (RT) in FY06. PNNL demonstrated a multi-level scheme that provides five radiance levels in 105 seconds with excellent repeatability. We have continued testing this repeatability in FY07. A burn-in effect appears in which the power increases over a certain time period. Repeatability better than 1%, however, is demonstrated for most of the radiance levels after this initial burn-in. In FY06, PNNL also began investigating a fiber-coupled RT QCL for a compact IR calibration source. PNNL demonstrated a uniform beam profile by measuring a time-averaged response and modulating the fiber optic with a motor to minimize the effects of speckle. In FY07, PNNL examined the power stability of fiber-coupled QCLs. Feedback appears to degrade the stability so that anti-reflective coatings for fibers may be essential. In FY07, PNNL continued to investigate the stability of room temperature QCLs as well as the measurement technique to provide a quantitative estimate for the measurement uncertainty. We designed and built a custom environmental enclosure to reduce the measurement uncertainty. After an initial burn-in, we have achieved uncertainties better than 0.1% for data collected over almost 100 hours of operation. We also built a bench-top system to demonstrate how the QC laser can be used to calibrate a microbolometer array and illustrated the importance of a multi-point calibration.

Myers, Tanya L.; Broocks, Bryan T.; Cannon, Bret D.; Ho, Nicolas

2007-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

Project Title and Principal Investigators FY 2014 Federal  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Sea Grant Program Project Title and Principal Investigators FY 2014 Federal Funding * FY 2014, NY, RI, WHOI Buy Out or Build Back? A Comparative Assessment of Approaches to Employing Public Stewards Academies in Maryland (Dana R. Fisher) $69,999 $35,007 MI Development of Stable Open Channel

487

April 9, 2014 FY 2015 Budget Request to Congress  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

as FY 2014. ATLAS operates at 95% of optimal. #12;7 Distribution of Users at the ~30 SC Facilities 2007. Validation and verification of materials codes will involve experiments using SC facilities to probe;6 Highlights of the FY 2015 SC Budget ­ Facility Ops Facility operations: Most of the scientific user

488

Recommendation 224: Recommendations on the FY 2016 DOE Oak Ridge Environmental Management Budget Request  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

ORSSAB provides recommendations on the DOE Oak Ridge Environmental Management budget request for FY 2016.

489

FY 2003 Progress Report for Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This FY 2003 Progress Report presents a description of the fuel cell and hydrogen research conducted by the Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program in fiscal year 2003 (FY 2003), projects to be implemented in FY 2004, and the research priorities for FY 2004.

490

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 Annual Performance Results and FYs 2015 and 2016 Annual Performance Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 Annual Performance Results and FYs 2015 and 2016 Annual Performance Plan

491

Review of the Oak Ridge Office FY 2012 Draft Schedules for Oversight Activitites  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ORO-2011-06-21 ORO-2011-06-21 Site: Oak Ridge Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Review of the Oak Ridge Office FY 2012 Draft Schedules for Oversight Activities Dates of Activity : 06/21/2011 Report Preparer: Tim Mengers Activity Description/Purpose: The purpose of the visit was for the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) site lead to gain operational awareness of the Oak Ridge Office (ORO)/Office of Environmental Management (EM) oversight activities and to review draft oversight schedules for the coming year. The HSS site lead met with EM managers to review next year's oversight schedules. The HSS site lead received a general listing of all EM oversight actions planned for FY 2012. EM is in the process of refining and prioritizing the reviews and

492

SRNS-RP-2013-00005 Savannah River Site Ten Year Site Plan FY  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SRNS-RP-2013-00005 SRNS-RP-2013-00005 Savannah River Site Ten Year Site Plan FY 2014 - 2023 May 2013 United States Department of Energy Savannah River Site Ten Year Site Plan FY 2014 - 2023 May 2013 Prepared by: Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC A Fluor Daniel Partnership Savannah River Site Aiken, SC 29808 SRNS-RP-2013-00005 Savannah River Site Ten Year Site Plan SRNS-RP-2013-00005 May 2013 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared by Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC (SRNS) for the United States Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC09-08SR22470 and is an account of work performed under that contract. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process or services by trademark, name, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement,

493

Aluminum Hydride - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Jason Graetz (Primary Contact), James Wegrzyn Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) Building 815 Upton, NY 11973 Phone: (631) 344-3242 Email: graetz@bnl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: October 1, 2011 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop onboard vehicle storage systems using aluminum hydride that meets all of DOE's targets for proton exchange membrane fuel cell vehicles. Produce aluminum hydride material with a hydrogen * storage capacity greater than 9.7% gravimetric (kg-H 2 /kg) and 0.13 kg-H 2 /L volumetric. Develop practical and economical processes for *

494

ORNLs Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2013 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) reports its status to the US Department of Energy (DOE) in March of each year. The program operates under the authority of DOE Order 413.2B, “Laboratory Directed Research and Development” (April 19, 2006), which establishes DOE’s requirements for the program while providing the Laboratory Director broad flexibility for program implementation. LDRD funds are obtained through a charge to all Laboratory programs. This report includes summaries of all ORNL LDRD research activities supported during FY 2013. The associated FY 2013 ORNL LDRD Self-Assessment (ORNL/PPA-2014/2) provides financial data and an internal evaluation of the program’s management process.

NA, NA [ORNL

2014-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

495

ORNLs Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2010 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) reports its status to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in March of each year. The program operates under the authority of DOE Order 413.2B, “Laboratory Directed Research and Development” (April 19, 2006), which establishes DOE’s requirements for the program while providing the Laboratory Director broad flexibility for program implementation. LDRD funds are obtained through a charge to all Laboratory programs. This report includes summaries of all ORNL LDRD research activities supported during FY 2010. The associated FY 2010 ORNL LDRD Self-Assessment (ORNL/PPA-2011/2) provides financial data and an internal evaluation of the program’s management process.

NA, NA [ORNL

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

496

ORNLs Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2011 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) reports its status to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in March of each year. The program operates under the authority of DOE Order 413.2B, “Laboratory Directed Research and Development” (April 19, 2006), which establishes DOE’s requirements for the program while providing the Laboratory Director broad flexibility for program implementation. LDRD funds are obtained through a charge to all Laboratory programs. This report includes summaries of all ORNL LDRD research activities supported during FY 2011. The associated FY 2011 ORNL LDRD Self-Assessment (ORNL/PPA-2012/2) provides financial data and an internal evaluation of the program’s management process.

NA, NA [ORNL

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

497

ORNLs Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2009 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) reports its status to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in March of each year. The program operates under the authority of DOE Order 413.2B, “Laboratory Directed Research and Development” (April 19, 2006), which establishes DOE’s requirements for the program while providing the Laboratory Director broad flexibility for program implementation. LDRD funds are obtained through a charge to all Laboratory programs. This report includes summaries all ORNL LDRD research activities supported during FY 2009. The associated FY 2009 ORNL LDRD Self-Assessment (ORNL/PPA-2010/2) provides financial data and an internal evaluation of the program’s management process.

NA, NA [ORNL

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

498

ORNLs Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2012 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) reports its status to the US Department of Energy (DOE) in March of each year. The program operates under the authority of DOE Order 413.2B, “Laboratory Directed Research and Development” (April 19, 2006), which establishes DOE’s requirements for the program while providing the Laboratory Director broad flexibility for program implementation. LDRD funds are obtained through a charge to all Laboratory programs. This report includes summaries of all ORNL LDRD research activities supported during FY 2012. The associated FY 2012 ORNL LDRD Self-Assessment (ORNL/PPA-2012/2) provides financial data and an internal evaluation of the program’s management process.

NA, NA [ORNL

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

499

Economic appraisal of oil potential of Williston basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An economic appraisal was made of the potential of more than 80 producing fields in the Williston basin of Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota. The major oil producing formations investigated were in the Mississippian, Devonian, Silurian and Ordovician. Data for the study came from field production and drilling statistics. An extrapolated oil production decline curve for a theoretical average producing well first was made for each field. The value of the total extrapolated amount of producible oil for the average well was then calculated, discounted for royalty, taxes, etc., and divided by the estimated cost for a completed producing well. This gave an estimate of the return per dollar invested. No considerations were given for exploration and land acquisition costs. The estimated return per dollar values, after posting on Williston basin geologic maps, show relative economic comparisons of producing formations and where within the basin the best economic returns can be expected.

Jennings, A.H.

1983-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

500

FY 2010 DOE Agency Financial Report | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Agency Financial Reports » FY 2010 DOE Agency Financial Agency Financial Reports » FY 2010 DOE Agency Financial Report FY 2010 DOE Agency Financial Report The Department's efforts brought it closer to its goals of: expanding the frontiers of science (science, discovery and innovation) creating clean energy jobs (economic prosperity) curbing the carbon pollution that threatens our planet (clean, secure energy) reducing nuclear dangers (national security) FY 2010 was the second year of implementing the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act). The Department contributed to the Administration's goal of stimulating the U.S. economy through ramping up its activities in energy-related areas of spending, project performance, and job creation. FY 2010 DOE Agency Financial Report More Documents & Publications