Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Office of Hearings and Appeals | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages

Hearings and Appeals Hearings and Appeals Search Search form Search Office of Hearings and Appeals Office of Hearings and Appeals Services Services Home Applications for Exceptions Conflict Prevention and Resolution Conflict Prevention and Resolution Home Contract Disputes Environmental Conflict Resolution Field Office Programs HQ Mediation Program Ombuds Program OCPR Forms Appeals Hearings Application for Refund Information Center Information Center Home Annual Reports Decision Summaries Filing Information Mission About Us Offices Office of Hearings and Appeals Office of Hearings and Appeals Leadership Poli A. Marmolejos Director Office of Hearings and Appeals Read Bio ‣ Fred L. Brown Deputy Director of Office of Hearings & Appeals Read Bio ‣ Janet N. Freimuth Chief of the Employee Protection and Exceptions Division

2

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 24, 2007, the Acting Director of the Office of August 24, 2007, the Acting Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals authorized me to render a decision on Burnette's complaint. August 30, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Jeffrey R. Burnette Date of Filing: August 23, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0071 Jeffrey R. Burnette (Burnette or the complainant), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under Section 708.17. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied. 1 I. Background This complainant's Part 708 history dates from 2001. A brief

3

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3, 2007 3, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Delbert F. Bunch Date of Filing: May 7, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0068 Delbert F. Bunch (Bunch or the complainant), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was dated September 6, 2006. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied. I. Background The complainant was an employee with Bechtel SAIC Company LLP (BSC), the prime contractor to the DOE Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCWRM) Yucca Mountain Project. The DOE OCRWM has been tasked to develop and manage a safe system to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. In

4

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2007 0, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Charles Montano Date of Filing: April 27, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0067 Charles Montano (the complainant), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was dated January 30, 2007. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied. I. Background The complainant, an auditor, has been an employee of the DOE's Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in Los Alamos, New Mexico since 1978. Until June 2006, the University of California (UC) held the management and operations (M&O) contract to run LANL for the DOE. On June 1, 2006, Los Alamos National Security (LANS) LLC assumed

5

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3, 2007 3, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Fredrick Abbott Date of Filing: February 21, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0062 Fredrick Abbott (the complainant or Abbott), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, I have determined that the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained and the appeal denied. I. Background The complainant is an employee with Washington Savannah River Company (WSRC), which operates the DOE's Savannah River site located in Aiken, South Carolina. Pursuant to Part 708, on April 13, 2006, he filed a complaint of retaliation against WSRC with the DOE's Savannah River Operations Office. In his complaint,

6

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

According to SNL, the 30 minute estimation period is the According to SNL, the 30 minute estimation period is the standard practice for this work group. 2/ The complainant later made the correction as directed and returned to work. December 19, 2006 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Donald R. Rhodes Date of Filing: December 8, 2006 Case Number: TBU-0058 Donald R. Rhodes (Rhodes or the complainant) appeals the dismissal of his August 25, 2006 complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. He filed the complaint with the Whistleblower Program Manager (WP Manager) of the DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA/SC), located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. As explained below, the WP Manager's November 16, 2006

7

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 29, 2006 November 29, 2006 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: William Cor Date of Filing: April 21, 2006 Case Number: TBU-0045 William Cor (the complainant or the employee), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be reversed and the matter remanded for further processing to the Whistleblower Program Manager at the National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA). I. Background The complainant was an employee with ARES Corporation, a DOE contractor at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Pursuant to Part 708, he filed a complaint of retaliation

8

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 22, 2007 March 22, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Misti Wall Date of Filing: February 15, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0061 Misti Wall (the complainant or Wall), appeals the dismissal of her complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be reversed and the matter remanded for further processing to the Whistleblower Program Manager (Manager) at the National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA). I. Background The complainant was an employee with Sandia Corporation (Sandia), a DOE contractor that runs Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Pursuant to Part 708, she

9

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Supplemental Order  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 1997 4, 1997 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Supplemental Order Name of Case:C. Lawrence Cornett Date of Filing:February 3, 1997 Case Number: VWX-0010 This Decision supplements an Initial Agency Decision, dated December 19, 1996, issued by the undersigned Hearing Officer of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy in a case involving a "whistleblower" complaint. The complaint was filed by C. Lawrence Cornett (Cornett) under the Department of Energy's Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. See C. Lawrence Cornett, 26 DOE ¶ 87,507 (1996) (Cornett). (1) In Cornett, I found that Maria Elena Torano Associates, Inc. (META), a DOE contractor, had violated the provisions of 10 C.F.R. § 708.5 by

10

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1996 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V34 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4476 Public Access Level public

11

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1999 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V37 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4479 Public Access Level public

12

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1998 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V36 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4478 Public Access Level public

13

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10 10 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2010 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/17/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4459 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2010

14

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2006 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve claims related to uniformed service members' pay, allowances, travel, transportation, retired pay, and survivor benefits Tags {"military personnel","government claims",pay,"military benefits","uniformed services",overpayment} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/29/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4471 Public Access Level public

15

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Military Personnel Claim Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2010 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2010 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve claims related to uniformed service members' pay, allowances, travel, transportation, retired pay, and survivor benefits Tags {"military personnel","government claims",pay,"military benefits","uniformed services",overpayment} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V33 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4475

16

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Transportation and Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1997 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1997 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V35 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil

17

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2002 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/09/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4451 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2002

18

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2006 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/13/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4455 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2006

19

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2003 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/10/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4452 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2003

20

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2008 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/15/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4457 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2008

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2009 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve claims related to uniformed service members' pay, allowances, travel, transportation, retired pay, and survivor benefits Tags {"military personnel","government claims",pay,"military benefits","uniformed services",overpayment} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V32 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4474 Public Access Level public

22

STUDENT HEARING BOARD 20132014 APPLICATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD 2013­2014 APPLICATION INTEGRITY,CIVILITY,&CONDUCT:FOSTERINGASAFECAMPUSCOMMUNITY #12;UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD I 2013­2014 APPLICATION To serve the UMBC community and the individual student by specifying behavioral standards, and by establishing a fair and efficient process

Maryland, Baltimore County, University of

23

STUDENT HEARING BOARD 20122013 APPLICATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD 2012­2013 APPLICATION INTEGRITY,CIVILITY,&CONDUCT:FOSTERINGASAFECAMPUSCOMMUNITY #12;UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD I 2012­2013 APPLICATION To serve the UMBC community and the individual student by specifying behavioral standards, and by establishing a fair and efficient process

Maryland, Baltimore County, University of

24

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

granted. I. Background The complainant is the Manager of the Employee Concerns and Ethics Office of the Battelle Energy Alliance (BEA). BEA manages the DOE's Idaho National...

25

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

her pay is less than that of another worker and her workload is greater are too vague to rise to the level of a Part 708 retaliation. There is no allegation or evidence that the...

26

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Part 708, a complainant is not required to wait until he has "official" evidence in order to file a complaint of retaliation. The investigator noted that the complaint must be...

27

Hearings | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hearings Hearings Hearings Security Hearings The DOE has established procedures that govern the resolution of questions concerning the eligibility of individuals who are employed by or applicants for employment with DOE contractors, agents, and DOE access permittees; individuals who are DOE employees or applicants for DOE employment; and other persons designated by the Secretary of Energy for access to classified matter or special nuclear material. (This access authorization is commonly referred to as a security clearance.) These procedures are codified in Subpart A of 10 CFR Part 710. Subpart A provides an opportunity for hearing and administrative review in cases when it is determined that questions concerning an individual's eligibility for access authorization

28

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 9, 2007 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Clint Olson Date of Filing: November 18, 2005 Case Number: TBA-0027 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on October 27, 2005, involving a Complaint of Retaliation filed by Clint Olson (also referred to as the employee or the complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. Olson was an employee of BWXT Pantex (also referred to as BWXT, the firm, or the contractor), the Management and Operating Contractor at the DOE's Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas. In his Complaint, Mr. Olson claims that BWXT retaliated against him for making disclosures that are protected under Part 708. In the IAD, an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing

29

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

06 06 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: S.R. Davis Date of Filing: May 19, 2004 Case Number: VBA-0083 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on April 21, 2004, involving a complaint filed by S.R. Davis (also referred to as the Complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In her Complaint, the Complainant claims that her former employer, Fluor Fernald, Inc. (the Contractor), retaliated against her for engaging in activity that is protected by Part 708. In the IAD, an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer determined that the Contractor met its burden of demonstrating, by clear and convincing evidence, that it would have taken the same action in the absence of the

30

CSP Policies & Procedures Process for Grade Appeals  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CSP Policies & Procedures Process for Grade Appeals Grade Appeals ­ Generally speaking, once grades

Leistikow, Bruce N.

31

Appeals | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appeals Appeals Appeals FOIA and Whistleblower Appeal Information The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, together contain the general principles under which executive agencies, such as the Department of Energy, make information in their possession available to the public and at the same time protect the privacy interest of individuals about whom the agency has obtained information. Each of these statutes requires the agencies to promulgate regulations that specify how these principles will be implemented. The Department of Energy's FOIA and Privacy Act regulations, 10 C.F.R. Parts 1004 and 1008, respectively, provide that individuals may request information from the Department of Energy (and in some instances correct

32

GRR/Section 9-FD-d - BLM Appeals Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

d - BLM Appeals Process d - BLM Appeals Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 9-FD-d - BLM Appeals Process 09FDDBLMAppealsProcess.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Bureau of Land Management United States Department of Interior Regulations & Policies 43 CFR 4.21: Hearings and Appeals - General Provisions 43 CFR 3200: Geothermal Resource Leasing Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 09FDDBLMAppealsProcess.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has an appeals process that allows

33

Judicial Incentives and the Appeals Process  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

All, or virtually all, court systems have some sort of appeals process whereby litigants that are dissatisfied with an initial decision can challenge that decision on appeal. The widespread availability of an appeals ...

Drahozal, Christopher R.

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

34

Academic Advisor Appeal Questionnaire To be submitted as part of Financial Aid Appeal Process  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Academic Advisor Appeal Questionnaire To be submitted as part of Financial Aid Appeal Process: ________________________________________ THE FOLLOWING IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ACADEMIC ADVISOR PRIOR TO FINANCIAL AID APPEAL MEETING Advisor Name: __________________________________ Department: __________________________________ Advisor Telephone: ______________________________ Advisor E

35

E-Print Network 3.0 - appeals Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

appeals Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 Flowchart for Academic Appeals Academic Appeal (Student-initiated) Summary: Flowchart for Academic Appeals Academic Appeal...

36

Instructions The following documents must be submitted before an appeal will be considered  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Instructions The following documents must be submitted before an appeal will be considered: Appeal of Denial Form ­ this document helps the applicant explain any extenuating circumstances or information or grade reports will be accepted. Optional Requirement ­ supporting documentation to substantiate new

Tipple, Brett

37

Hearing Loss  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Earphones Potentially as Dangerous as Noise from Jet Engines, Earphones Potentially as Dangerous as Noise from Jet Engines, Researchers Find Aug. 29, 2012 - Turning the volume up too high on your headphones can damage the coating of nerve cells, leading to temporary deafness, scientists from the University of Leicester have shown for the first time. Earphones or headphones on personal music players can reach noise levels similar to those of jet engines, the researchers said. Noises louder than 110 decibels are known to cause hearing problems such as temporary deafness and tinnitus (ringing in the ears), but the University of Leicester study is the first time the underlying cell damage has been observed. The study has been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. University of Leicester researcher Dr Martine Hamann of the Department of Cell Physiology and Pharmacology,

38

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Janet L. Westbrook  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2002 9, 2002 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Janet L. Westbrook Date of Filing: January 17, 2002 Case Number: VBA-0059 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on December 21, 2001, involving a Complaint filed by Janet L. Westbrook (Westbrook or the Complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In her Complaint, Westbrook claims that her former employer, UT-Battelle, LLC (Battelle or the Company), the DOE contractor that manages the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (the Laboratory), terminated her as part of a reduction in force (RIF) as a retaliation for making disclosures that are protected under Part 708. In the IAD, however, the Hearing Officer determined that Battelle had shown that it would have terminated the

39

Dog Teeth and Hearing  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Dog Teeth and Hearing Dog Teeth and Hearing Name: Chad Status: other Grade: 9-12 Location: Outside U.S. Country: Canada Date: Spring 2011 Question: Can a bad tooth problem, infection (we've had several teeth pulled) cause a problem with deafness in a dog ? We have a snoodle 14 years old, but still in other wise good health. Replies: Hi Chad, Sorry to hear about Snoodle's hearing and dental problems. Deafness in an older dog is not uncommon and it would not likely be due to any tooth related problems. A severe tooth infection that extends or penetrates through the bone into the ear canal would be very rare and you would see very obvious symptoms in the ear. If your vet has examined Snoodle and there were no obvious problems related to the ear canal, then I would attribute the hearing loss to an age related change. I hope this helps.

40

Noise and Hearing Conservation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hearing Conservation Hearing Conservation Mary L. Doyle NOISE & HEARING CONSERVATION Mary L. Doyle, MPH, RN, COHN-S/CM DOE Headquarters January 16, 2002 1.0.1.~ CAUSES OF HEARING LOSS * Congenital * Environmental Exposures * Hereditary * Illness *Injury * Noise * Occupational * Non-Occupational * Sociacusis S.O.S. eon.ua.nt. OTOTOXIC DRUGS Can Affect Cochlea or Vestibular System * Aminoglycoside Antibiotics * Diuretics * Cancer Chemotherapy * Aspirin * Quinines * Usually Permanent * Consider Benefit-Risk Ratio S.O.S. eon.ua.nts HEARING * Modification of Acoustic Wave by Outer Ear * Conversion of Modified Acoustic Wave to Vibration of Eardrum * Middle Ear * Inner Ear * Transformation of Mechanical Movement to Nerve Impulses S.O.S. CoMubRis OTOTOXIC INDUSTRIAL

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Hear-Through and Mic-Through Augmented Reality: Using Bone Conduction to Display Spatialized Audio  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hear-Through and Mic-Through Augmented Reality: Using Bone Conduction to Display Spatialized Audio-generated audio for augmented reality (AR) applications. Analogous to optical-see-through and video-see-through techniques in the visual domain, we present Hear-Through and Mic-Through audio AR. Hear-Through AR uses

Lindeman, Robert W.

42

PSH-13-0062 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0062 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 16, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that the DOE should not restore an individual's suspended DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred the individual, an applicant for DOE access authorization, to administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including the individual's two past arrests for Driving While Intoxicated as well as his diagnosis of alcohol dependence by a DOE consultant-psychologist. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. Following the hearing, the Hearing Officer determined that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to mitigate the

43

PSH-12-0110 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0110 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 16, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that an individual should be granted DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred an applicant for a security clearance to administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including the opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual was a user of alcohol habitually to excess. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer determined that

44

PSH-12-0047 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0047 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that an individual should be granted DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred an applicant for a security clearance to administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including the opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual was a user of alcohol habitually to excess, as well as the individual's past arrests. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer determined that the individual mitigated the

45

Application for Refund | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Application for Refund Application for Refund Application for Refund During the period 1973 through 1981, the Federal government imposed price and allocation controls of crude oil and refined petroleum products, such as gasoline and heating oil. During that period and for many years afterwards, the DOE had an enforcement program. When a firm was found to have overcharged, the DOE generally required the firm to make refunds to its customers. However, because of the price controls in place at the time and the manner in which the petroleum industry operates, it was impossible for the DOE to determine in many cases who was injured by the overcharges. In those cases involving overcharges related to the price of refined petroleum products, the Office of Hearings and Appeals instituted claims

46

Ease of Icon Processing Can Predict Icon Appeal  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Correlations between subjective ratings of interface usability and appeal have been frequently reported. This study examined the possibility that the relationship between usability and appeal are underpinned by i...

Sin McDougall; Irene Reppa

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

ELECTRONIC BILLING EXEMPTION APPEAL Return this form  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ELECTRONIC BILLING EXEMPTION APPEAL Return this form In person on campus: 333 Science Teaching or black ink. DIRECTIONS To be considered for an exemption from an electronic billing, which is mandatory to be exempt from electronic billing. If you circumstances are similar to the following examples, you may

Amin, S. Massoud

48

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. 14565 Case: 07-71576 10/28/2009 Page: 1 of 19 DktFOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION, Petitioner, No. 07-71576v. DOE No.DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, EE-RM-PET-100Respondent, OPINIONTHE ASSOCIATION

49

R. A. Fisher Memorial Appeal  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... SIR JOHN GADDTJM, chairman of the Sir Ronald Fisher Memorial Committee of Great Britain, writes:"R. A. Fisher ranks among ... host of applications of the most practical kind. The University of Adelaide, where Sir Ronald spent his last years, has already established a Sir ...

1964-06-13T23:59:59.000Z

50

Audiometry (hearing test)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The audiogram is an evaluation of how well an individual can hear. Sounds are presented to the individual through earphones during the test. These sounds are presented at different levels of frequency and intensity. The human ear responds to the frequency or pitch of a sound and the intensity or loudness of the sound.

51

File:09FDDBLMProtestAndAppealsProcess (2).pdf | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

FDDBLMProtestAndAppealsProcess (2).pdf FDDBLMProtestAndAppealsProcess (2).pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage File:09FDDBLMProtestAndAppealsProcess (2).pdf Size of this preview: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 × 600 pixels. Full resolution ‎(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 56 KB, MIME type: application/pdf) File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 17:34, 25 October 2012 Thumbnail for version as of 17:34, 25 October 2012 1,275 × 1,650 (56 KB) Dklein2012 (Talk | contribs) You cannot overwrite this file. Edit this file using an external application (See the setup instructions for more information) File usage There are no pages that link to this file. Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=File:09FDDBLMProtestAndAppealsProcess_(2).pdf&oldid=530932"

52

OHA Case Tracking System PIA,Office of Hearings and Appeals ...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Employees' Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA) Tracking Database, INL Energy Employees' Occupational Illness Compensation Program Occupational Injury &...

53

DOE Solar Decathlon: News Blog » Market Appeal  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

'Market Appeal' 'Market Appeal' South China University Takes the Lead at Solar Decathlon China Friday, August 9, 2013 Richard King The results of three contests were announced at Solar Decathlon China this morning. Teams gathered in the auditorium of the Sun Palace, and jury members announced the first, second, and third place for Engineering, Communications, and Market Appeal. The results are: Engineering University of Wollongong - Australia South China University of Technology and Huazhong University of Science and Technology - China Chalmers University of Technology - Sweden Communications Chalmers University of Technology - Sweden University of Wollongong - Australia South China University of Technology and Huazhong University of Science and Technology - China Market Appeal

54

32.01 Employee Complaint and Appeal Procedures Page 1 of 2 32.01 Employee Complaint and Appeal Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

32.01 Employee Complaint and Appeal Procedures Page 1 of 2 32.01 Employee Complaint and Appeal Procedures Approved February 27, 1995 (MO 44-95) Revised October 13, 1995 (MO 335-95) Revised September 26. Procedures and Responsibilities 1. The chancellor shall establish comprehensive regulations

55

Security Hearing FAQs | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Hearings » Security Hearing FAQs Services » Hearings » Security Hearing FAQs Security Hearing FAQs (1) What is the purpose of the hearing? The purpose of the hearing is to provide you with an opportunity to respond to the DOE's questions concerning your eligibility to hold a security clearance ("security concerns"), as outlined in the Statement of Charges attached to the Notification Letter. During the hearing, you will be able to present evidence to explain, refute or mitigate the derogatory information cited in the Statement of Charges. After the hearing, the Hearing Officer will review the testimonial and documentary evidence in the record, and issue a Decision which contains findings of fact and a determination whether or not to grant or restore your security clearance.

56

OHA Worker Appeal Cases Archive File | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

archive file of our Worker Appeal decisions, Please download this file to your local computer and use the build in adobe search feature. Individual cases are listed in the...

57

Karen, White, Appeal of Honeywell International, Inc. ASBCA No...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

c e - E x c e l l e n c e Appeal of Honeywell International, Inc. ASBCA No. 57779 Karen White Staff Attorney USAF Utility Law Field Support Center 1 Case Background n In July...

58

Effects of Weapon Noise on Hearing  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...In military spheres, the need for prevention of weapon noise-induced hearing loss is receiving ever-...

A. Dancer; R. Franke

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

59

Interior Board of Land Appeals | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Interior Board of Land Appeals Interior Board of Land Appeals Jump to: navigation, search Name Interior Board of Land Appeals Address 801 N. Quincy Street, Suite 300 Place Arlington, Virginia Zip 22203 Phone number 703-235-9902 Website http://www.oha.doi.gov/about_i Coordinates 38.880369°, -77.107316° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.880369,"lon":-77.107316,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

60

HEARING CONSERVATION TABLE OF CONTENTS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.10, "Recording Criteria for Cases Involving Occupational Hearing Loss". ANSI S1.11-1971 "Specification for Octave, Half-Octave, and Third-Octave Band Filter Sets" ANSI S1.25-1978 "Specification for Personal Noise Dosimeters" ANSI S1.4-1971 "Specification for Sound Level Meters" ANSI S3.6-1969 "Specifications

Holland, Jeffrey

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Accommodations for Hearing Disabilities | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hearing Disabilities Hearing Disabilities Accommodations for Hearing Disabilities Although the general term "hearing impaired" is being used to include both deaf and hard of hearing individuals, the needs of these two groups may vary greatly. In general, people who are deaf depend more upon visual skills for communication and information in their environment while hard of hearing people enhance their usable hearing while relying on auditory input more than visual input. This general difference drives many of the concerns and needs mentioned in this section. It is key that the individual participate in the process of identifying the accommodation solution to ensure it is suitable for the individual and their needs. Visual Redundancy on Computers - Ensure that important information

62

49 A.R.S. 321 et seq.: Water Quality Appeals | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Water Quality Appeals Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: 49 A.R.S. 321 et seq.: Water Quality AppealsLegal Abstract...

63

1engineering.vanderbilt.edu Vanderbilt appeals to engineering  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1engineering.vanderbilt.edu #12;2 3 Vanderbilt appeals to engineering students who want to put. These skills will be valuable throughout your life--not only when you are solving engineering problems. Our curriculum allows you to examine various engineering majors from multiple perspectives before you declare

Simaan, Nabil

64

Department of Human Resources REQUEST FOR APPEAL OF JOB EVALUATION REVIEW RESULTS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. TELEPHONE #: Aiken Plan Factor(s) Appealed Post-Review Rating(s) (Ratings outlined on the Notification of Job Evaluation Review Results form) Proposed Rating(s) (Based upon your review of the Aiken PlanDepartment of Human Resources REQUEST FOR APPEAL OF JOB EVALUATION REVIEW RESULTS APPEAL 02

Oyet, Alwell

65

Department of Human Resources REQUEST FOR APPEAL OF JOB EVALUATION REVIEW RESULTS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#: Aiken Plan Factor(s) Appealed Post-Review Rating(s) (Ratings outlined on the Notification of Job Evaluation Review Results form) Proposed Rating(s) (Based upon your review of the Aiken Plan) ReasonDepartment of Human Resources REQUEST FOR APPEAL OF JOB EVALUATION REVIEW RESULTS APPEAL 02

Oyet, Alwell

66

FM13 Glastir woodland creation appeals form 3 December, 2010 Glastir Woodland Creation Appeals Process-Red Areas  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Process-Red Areas Glastir Woodland Creation Appeals Process ­ Red Areas This should only be used where you: What is the reason/s for the RED designation? Why do you think that the area has been incorrectly the boundary of the area that you wish to plant in the red areas in question Project Officer

67

PSH-11-0024 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

24 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 24 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0024 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an applicant for a DOE security clearance. In March 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address his alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in August 2011 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). PSH-11-0024.pdf More Documents & Publications TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security

68

Fiscal year 1985 Department of Energy authorization. Volume I. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy Research and Production and the Subcommittee on Energy Development and Applications, US House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session, March 13, 1984  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Volume I of the hearing record covers the March 13, 1984 testimony of Martha Hesse, Assistant DOE Secretary for Management and Administration, on the fiscal year 1985 budget request for DOE administration. Ms. Hesse discussed specific budget justifications, including funding for the Technical Information Services, in-house energy management, and policy initiatives, such as the realignment of some functions within the department, the introduction of an integrated accouting and personnel and payroll systems, and other efforts to reduce overhead costs. She reported a three percent drop in staffing level. Following a prepared statement by Ms. Hesse and introductory remarks by committee members, the bulk of the hearing record contains responses to committee questions.

Not Available

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

69

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Published Decisions - 2011 |  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Published Decisions - 2011 Dataset Summary Description post-award contract disputes between government contractors and the Department of Defense, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and other entities with whom the ASBCA has entered into agreements to provide services. Tags {"contract dispute","defense contractor; contract appeal"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 12/01/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email Catherine.Stanton@ASBCA.MIL Unique Identifier DOD-5473 Public Access Level public

70

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Published Decisions - 2005 |  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

05 05 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Published Decisions - 2005 Dataset Summary Description post-award contract disputes between government contractors and the Department of Defense, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and other entities with whom the ASBCA has entered into agreements to provide services. Tags {"contract dispute","defense contractor; contract appeal"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/07/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email Catherine.Stanton@ASBCA.MIL Unique Identifier DOD-4439

71

The Sense of Hearing in Fish*  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... THERE is an old dispute as to whether fish are able to hear or not. It has seemed improbable that they can. Three ... main reasons have been brought forward against it. (1) A biological reason: most fish seem to be dumb ; a sense of hearing would therefore not be of biological ...

K. VON FRISCH

1938-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

72

Audiometry (hearing test) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Audiometry (hearing test) Audiometry (hearing test) Audiometry (hearing test) The audiogram is an evaluation of how well an individual can hear. Sounds are presented to the individual through earphones during the test. These sounds are presented at different levels of frequency and intensity. The human ear responds to the frequency or pitch of a sound and the intensity or loudness of the sound. The frequency of the sound is measured in Hertz (Hz), and the loudness of the sound is measured in decibels (dB). During the procedure, the responses of the individual are recorded on a graph. An individual has no impairment in hearing if he or she detects the sound that is presented through the earphones in the range of 0 to 25 decibels. The audiogram indicates how much louder (in decibels) the pure tone frequency

73

Protect Your Hearing Every Day Information and Recommendations  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

that it too loud, or too loud for too long, is dangerous to hearing health, no matter what kind of sound musicians, this involves safeguarding your hearing health. Whatever your plans after graduation whether some information on hearing health and hearing loss and let you know about the precautionary measures

Saldin, Dilano

74

PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual, a 48-year-old employee of a DOE contractor, is an applicant for DOE access authorization. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in May 2011, and participated in an August 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 8, 9. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE psychiatrist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist evaluated the Individual in September 2011 and issued a report. DOE Exs. 6, 7. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the

75

PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 14 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual, a 48-year-old employee of a DOE contractor, is an applicant for DOE access authorization. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in May 2011, and participated in an August 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 8, 9. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE psychiatrist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist evaluated the Individual in September 2011 and issued a report. DOE Exs. 6, 7. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the

76

TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is an applicant for a DOE access authorization in connection with his employment with a DOE contractor. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in June 2010, and participated in an October 2010 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 7, 8. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychologist ("the DOE psychologist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist evaluated the Individual in February 2011 and issued a report. DOE Ex. 10. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the Individual in a June 2011 Notification Letter

77

TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is an applicant for a DOE access authorization in connection with his employment with a DOE contractor. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in June 2010, and participated in an October 2010 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 7, 8. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychologist ("the DOE psychologist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist evaluated the Individual in February 2011 and issued a report. DOE Ex. 10. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the Individual in a June 2011 Notification Letter

78

Speech-Language-Hearing Department of Communication  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and stuttering. Prof. Gottwald is ASHA certified, holds a NH license to practice speech-language pathology Speech-Language-Hearing Center for almost two years. I have had a stutter almost all of my life and I

New Hampshire, University of

79

Project risk and appeals in U.S. Forest Service planning  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires U.S. Forest Service planning processes to be conducted by interdisciplinary teams of resource specialists to analyze and disclose the likely environmental impacts of proposed natural resource management actions on Forest Service lands. Multiple challenges associated with these processes have been a source of frustration for the agency. One of these challenges involves administrative appeals through which public entities can challenge a Forest Service decision following a NEPA process. These appeals instigate an internal review process and can result in an affirmation of the Forest Service decision, a reversal of that decision, or additional work that re-initiates all or part of the NEPA process. We examine the best predictors of appeals and their outcomes on a representative sample of 489 Forest Service NEPA processes that were decided between 2007 and 2009. While certain factors associated with pre-existing social contexts (such as a history of controversy) or pre-determined elements of a proposed action (such as the extraction of forest products) predispose certain processes to a higher risk of appeals, other practices and process-related strategies within the control of the agency also appear to bear meaningful influence on the occurrence of appeals and their outcomes. Appeals and their outcomes were most strongly related to programmatic, structural (turnover of personnel in particular), and relationship risks (both internal and external) within the processes, suggesting the need for greater focus within the agency on cultivating positive internal and external relationships to manage the risk of appeals. -- Highlights: ? We examined appeals and their outcomes on 489 U.S. Forest Service NEPA processes. ? Project type, context, team turnover, and personal relationships predicted appeals. ? External relationship management and staff turnover best predicted appeal outcomes. ? Positive internal and external relationships appear to reduce appeal risks.

Stern, Marc J., E-mail: mjstern@vt.edu [Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, 304 Cheatham Hall (0324), Blacksburg, VA 24061 (United States); Predmore, S. Andrew, E-mail: spred2@uis.edu [Department of Environmental Studies, University of Illinois-Springfield, Public Affairs Center, Room 314, Springfield, IL 62703 (United States); Morse, Wayde C., E-mail: morsewc@auburn.edu [School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, 3301 Forestry and Wildlife Bldg., Auburn, AL 36849 (United States); Seesholtz, David N., E-mail: dseesholtz@fs.fed.us [Focused Science Delivery Program, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1249S Vinnell Way, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83709 (United States)

2013-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

80

Appendix A: Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appendix A: Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures A. Introduction B. Parties to the Complaint C. Committee and Panels D. Cases of Physical. For the purpose of these procedures, the parties are identified as the University presenter and the accused

Amin, S. Massoud

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

PSH-12-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and an applicant for an access authorization. To address concerns related to the individual's past use of alcohol and marijuana, other prior criminal conduct, and certain discrepancies in the record regarding the individual's conduct, a Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on August 29, 2011. Exhibit 10. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth

82

TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an applicant for a DOE security clearance. In March 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address her alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in April 2011 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). According to the DOE psychiatrist, the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. tso1102.pdf More Documents & Publications

83

PSH-12-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and is an applicant for DOE access authorization. In August 2010, the individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) and was subject to an Office of Personnel Management (OPM) background investigation. He provided information to the Local Security Office (LSO) during a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) conducted in March 2011 that was inconsistent with answers he provided on his QNSP and during his OPM investigation, revealing that he had been hospitalized in January 2010 for alcohol abuse, treatment of prescription drug addiction and depression. Because the LSO could not resolve these discrepancies and the concerns

84

PSH-11-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing This case involves an Individual with a pattern of failing to meet his financial obligations dating back to 1993. A Local Security Office (LSO) has been monitoring the Individual's financial situation since his original application for a security clearance in 2000. In 2006, the LSO received information indicating that the Individual had a large number of delinquent debts. The LSO subsequently conducted a series of five Personal Security Interviews (PSI) of the Individual, the most recent on September 29, 2011. Unable to resolve the security concerns raised by the Individual's continuing financial issues, and by the sometimes inconsistent and contradictory information provided by the Individual, the

85

PSH-11-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and an applicant for an access authorization. On a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP), the individual disclosed that he had been charged with sexual penetration of a minor in 2003 and possession of marijuana in 1997. Exhibit 9. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on April 6, 2011. Exhibit 10. After the PSI, the LSO referred the individual to a local psychiatrist (hereinafter referred to as "the DOE psychiatrist") for an agency-sponsored evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist prepared a written report, setting forth the results of that evaluation, and sent it to the

86

PSH-12-0015 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0015 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an applicant for a DOE security clearance. In July 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address his alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual=s medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in October 2011 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). According to the DOE psychiatrist, the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist further

87

No. 07-71576 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Beck, Jr., Senior Staff Counsel Attorneys for Petitioner CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1516 Ninth StreetNo. 07-71576 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, et al., Respondents APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION

88

UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES UC BERKELEY 2011/2012 OFFICE APPEAL OF WAIVER DENIAL  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

INSURANCE PLAN (SHIP) APPEAL OF WAIVER DENIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Please read this material below before filing term. 4. Evaluation of your appeal will be based on comparability guidelines in effect at the time Berkeley, CA 94720-4300 FAX: (510) 642-9119 Email: ship@uhs.berkeley.edu Dear Insurance Coordinator: I

Doudna, Jennifer A.

89

TSO-01113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

TSO-01113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-01113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual currently is employed by a DOE contractor, and that...

90

Autonomy in Extremis: An Intelligent Waiver of Appeals on Death Row  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This article provides an in-depth account of the experiences of one condemned prisoner, Joseph Mitchel Parsons, who made the profound decision to waive his appeals and expedite his execution after serving elev...

Robert Johnson; Sandra McGunigall-Smith

2014-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

An exploration of the relationship between use of parks and access, park appeal, and communication effectiveness  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

AN EXPLORATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN USE OF PARKS AND ACCESS, PARK APPEAL, AND COMMUNICATION EFFECTIVENESS A Dissertation by JAMIE RAE WALKER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial... fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2008 Major Subject: Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences AN EXPLORATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN USE OF PARKS AND ACCESS, PARK APPEAL, AND COMMUNICATION...

Walker, Jamie Rae

2009-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

92

PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - Personnel Security Hearing 6 - Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing On October 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted . A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's falsification and financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that the requisite element of "deliberateness" was met under Criterion F. She further found that

93

Implementation of a Signal Processor with Intelligibility for Hearing Aid Devices  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hearing loss victims suffer from loss of hearing at specific bands of the frequency spectrum. We designed a programmable filter that can compensate for hearing losses at different frequency bands. We design the circuit using operational amplifiers...

Prasad, Sharath N.

2011-08-08T23:59:59.000Z

94

VEE-0041- In the Matter of Hampton Gas Company, Inc.  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On March 3, 1997, Hampton Gas Company, Inc. (Hampton) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Hampton...

95

VEE-0032- In the Matter of Thomas Oil Company  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On September 13, 1996, Thomas Oil Company (Thomas Oil) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Thomas...

96

VEE-0040- In the Matter of Western Star Propane, Inc.  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On February 18, 1997, Western Star Propane, Inc. (Western) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application,...

97

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Court of Appeals Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 10-1074 September Term, 2010 FILED ON: DECEMBER 13, 2010 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS Consolidated with 10-1076 Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of Energy Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; BROWN, Circuit Judge; and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. J U D G M E N T This appeal was considered on the record and the briefs submitted by the parties. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. CIR. R. 34(j). The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. CIR. R.36(d). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review is dismissed.

98

Hearing Nano-Structures: A Case Study in Timbral Sonification  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

We explore the sonification of x-ray scattering data, which are two-dimensional arrays of intensity whose meaning is obscure and non-intuitive. Direct mapping of the experimental data into sound is found to produce timbral sonifications that, while sacrificing conventional aesthetic appeal, provide a rich auditory landscape for exploration. We discuss the optimization of sonification variables, and speculate on potential real-world applications. We have presented a case study of sonifying x-ray scattering data. Direct mapping of the two-dimensional intensity values of a scattering dataset into the two-dimensional matrix of a sonogram is a natural and information-preserving operation that creates rich sounds. Our work supports the notion that many problems in understanding rather abstract scientific datasets can be ameliorated by adding the auditory modality of sonification. We further emphasize that sonification need not be limited to time-series data: any data matrix is amenable. Timbral sonification is less obviously aesthetic, than tonal sonification, which generate melody, harmony, or rhythm. However these musical sonifications necessarily sacrifice information content for beauty. Timbral sonification is useful because the entire dataset is represented. Non-musicians can understand the data through the overall color of the sound; audio experts can extract more detailed insight by studying all the features of the sound.

Schedel, M.; Yager, K.

2012-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

99

Acquisition of hearing aids and assistive listening devices among the pediatric hearing-impaired population  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Sufficient access to health care is of concern to the indigent population in the US and to their health care providers. This study was undertaken to elucidate the rate of the follow-up among lower socioeconomic hearing-impaired pediatric patients who had received a recommendation for hearing aids and/or assistive listening devices. Our question was, would the families financial situation have a negative effect on the acquisition of hearing aids and assistive listening devices? Fifty patients, age 018 years, who had been seen in our clinic over 2 years were evaluated via a telephone survey. The survey consisted of seven questions, including whether or not the devices or aids were obtained, what type was purchased, where the device was being used, and the childs apparent performance with the device. Eighty-two percent of our patients were on TennCare, a state mandated Medicaid HMO system. Two-thirds of these TennCare patients are at or below the poverty level and the remaining one-third is either disabled or uninsurable according to the Aid for Dependent Children (AFDC) with indeterminate income. In addition the TennCare organization did not cover hearing amplification equipment for these children. The study showed that the majority of the patients did follow-up as recommended. Furthermore, this equipment is easily obtainable for the pediatric indigent population due to financial resources available in the community outside the mandated Medicaid system.

Fannie S Leake; Jerome W Thompson; Erin Simms; James Bailey; Rose Mary S Stocks; Anne M Murphy

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

EIS-0372: Notice of Public Hearings | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Public Hearings Public Hearings EIS-0372: Notice of Public Hearings Proposed Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect The Department of Energy (DOE) announces two public hearings on the ''Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect'' (DOE/EIS-0372). Notice of Public Hearings for the Proposed Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Inteconnect (DOE/EIS-0372) (September 2005 - 70 FR 53786) More Documents & Publications EIS-0372: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and to Conduct Public Scoping Meetings and Notice of Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement PP-89-1 Bangor Hydro-Electric Company EIS-0372: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

UNITED STATES COUR'T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CALTFOIWTA ENERGY COMMISSION, ) No. ----  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Michael Doughton, Senior Staff Counsel, SBN 111084 Attorneys for Petitioner CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMlUNITED STATES COUR'T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CALTFOIWTA ENERGY COMMISSION, ) No. -- -- 1 Petitioner, 1 V. 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW ) UNI'TEDSTATESDEPAKTMENTOF ) ENERGY, and SAMUEL W. BODMAN

102

Social Policy appeals to students who are interested in current political and social issues  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

with Politics, Sociology, Social Anthropology, Social Work, and Science, Technology and Innovation StudiesSocial Policy appeals to students who are interested in current political and social issues.g. sociological, political, economic, historical and legal perspectives. Why study Social Policy at Edinburgh

Schnaufer, Achim

103

Academic Handbook, Appeals, Accommodation for Students with Disabilities Handbook Page 1 Issued: 2008 08  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Academic Handbook, Appeals, Accommodation for Students with Disabilities Handbook Page 1 Issued: 2008 08 Faculty Handbook on the Implementation of the Policy on Academic Accommodation for Students, human, physical or financial resources are not and cannot be made available to accommodate a particular

Lennard, William N.

104

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Vestibular Schwannomas Accelerates Hearing Loss  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Objective: To evaluate long-term tumor control and hearing preservation rates in patients with vestibular schwannoma treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), comparing hearing preservation rates to an untreated control group. The relationship between radiation dose to the cochlea and hearing preservation was also investigated. Methods and Materials: Forty-two patients receiving FSRT between 1997 and 2008 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. All patients received 54 Gy in 27-30 fractions during 5.5-6.0 weeks. Clinical and audiometry data were collected prospectively. From a 'wait-and-scan' group, 409 patients were selected as control subjects, matched by initial audiometric parameters. Radiation dose to the cochlea was measured using the original treatment plan and then related to changes in acoustic parameters. Results: Actuarial 2-, 4-, and 10-year tumor control rates were 100%, 91.5%, and 85.0%, respectively. Twenty-one patients had serviceable hearing before FSRT, 8 of whom (38%) retained serviceable hearing at 2 years after FSRT. No patients retained serviceable hearing after 10 years. At 2 years, hearing preservation rates in the control group were 1.8 times higher compared with the group receiving FSRT (P=.007). Radiation dose to the cochlea was significantly correlated to deterioration of the speech reception threshold (P=.03) but not to discrimination loss. Conclusion: FSRT accelerates the naturally occurring hearing loss in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Our findings, using fractionation of radiotherapy, parallel results using single-dose radiation. The radiation dose to the cochlea is correlated to hearing loss measured as the speech reception threshold.

Rasmussen, Rune, E-mail: rune333@gmail.com [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Claesson, Magnus [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Stangerup, Sven-Eric [Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Roed, Henrik [Department of Radiation Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Department of Radiation Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Christensen, Ib Jarle [Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Caye-Thomasen, Per [Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Juhler, Marianne [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

105

VES-0071- In the Matter of Mississippi Power Company  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On May 1, 2000, the Mississippi Power Company, of Gulfport, Mississippi (Mississippi Power), filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy an Application for...

106

VEE-0043- In the Matter of Greenville Automatic Gas Company  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On March 11, 1997, Greenville Automatic Gas Company (Greenville) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its...

107

Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing September 14, 2011 - 12:04am Addthis Dan Leistikow Dan Leistikow Former Director, Office of Public Affairs This morning, the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations is holding a hearing to discuss Solyndra Solar, the California-based solar manufacturer that declared bankruptcy last week. Jonathan Silver, Executive Director of the Department's Loan Programs Office, will be testifying. We've posted Jonathan's written testimony online. The testimony is very thorough and provides a good explanation of the loan process and the extensive reviews and analysis conducted by the Department between 2006 and 2009. He also explains the remarkable changes in the solar market since

108

Application  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Applications science-innovationassetsimagesicon-science.jpg Application These capabilities are our science and engineering at work for the national security interest in areas...

109

Attacks on computers: Congressional hearings and pending legislation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During the First Session of the 98th Congress, several days of hearings were held on the activities of computer enthusiasts including the Milwaukee 414s and others. The First Session also saw the introduction in the House of six bills dealing with various aspects and computer crime. A summary of those hearings, along with a summary of the pending computer crime bills, will be presented.

Bailey, D.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

A wireless volume control receiver for hearing aids  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) Robert DeOtte ember) ~ Jolte Pineda Gyvez (Me r) Alt n Patton (Head o Department) August 1993 ABSTRACT A Wireless Volume Control Receiver for Hearing Aids. (August 1993) Alexander Herve Reyes, B. S. , Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory... Committee: Dr. Edgar Sdnchez ? Sinencio Hearing aids have been greatly improved over the past few years because of better technology and more innovative ideas. Today, these devices are smaller in size, consume less power and some can be programmed to fit...

Reyes, Alexander Herve

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

111

Student Academic Grievance Hearing Procedures Definitions and Abbreviations used in the Student Academic Grievance Hearing Procedures of  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Student Academic Grievance Hearing Procedures Definitions and Abbreviations used in the Student Freedom for Students at Michigan State University; also known as the Academic Freedom Report, applies primarily to undergraduate students GSRR: Graduate Students Rights and Responsibilities; applies to graduate

112

Fiscal Year 1986 Department of Energy Authorization (Conservation and Renewable Energy). Volume III. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Energy Development and Applications of the Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session, March 5, 7, 1985  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Volume III of the hearing record covers two days of hearings on DOE budget requests for energy conservation and renewable energy programs. The witnesses included DOE and several panels of representatives of utility regulatory commissions, the solar industry, research laboratories, organizations involved in building construction and engineering, private citizens, and others interested in the efficient use of energy and the development of alternative energy sources. Energy Under Secretary William Patrick Collins defended the budget request as consistent with the goals of the fourth national energy policy plan in its support of a mix of technologies. Witnesses described successful efforts, such as the Building and Community Systems and the Industrial Energy Conservation Programs, as well as progress reports on the various technologies. An appendix with additional material submitted for the record follows the testimony.

Not Available

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

PSH-13-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 9, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. A DOE Psychiatrist had found that the individual suffered from alcohol abuse. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual mitigated these security concerns at the hearing by presenting evidence that he had more than fully complied with the DOE Psychiatrist's treatment recommendations and the treatment has been effective. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-13-0052.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-13-0083 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

114

PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of four arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. OHA Case No. PSH-12-0068 Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0068.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0129 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0131 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing

115

PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of four arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. OHA Case No. PSH-12-0068 Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0068.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0129 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0035 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

116

Balancing Functionality with Mass Appeal in Application Development: Case Study OneTouchPM  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to protect both interviewees and clients. * * * * * - 1 - Chapter 1 - Introduction In 2006 Burns & McDonnell (BMcD) was preparing for the construction phase of the largest transmission construction project in U.S. history (by dollars). The unprecedented... with project demands. 1.2 Flexibility OneTouchPM is implemented on a project by project basis. For example, a large scale transmission line project in Oklahoma and another in California would produce two differing OneTouchPM projects. Each...

Gepner, Christina M.

2011-05-20T23:59:59.000Z

117

Draft Greater Than Class C EIS Public Hearings to Come to Pasco, WA and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

The United States Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM), is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for disposal of Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level Radioactive Waste (GTCC LLRW). The EIS evaluates potential alternatives involving various disposal methods for application at six federally owned sites and generic commercial sites. (See Overview Below). The United States Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM), is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for disposal of Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level Radioactive Waste (GTCC LLRW). The EIS evaluates potential alternatives involving various disposal methods for application at six federally owned sites and generic commercial sites. (See Overview Below). Upcoming Public Hearings DOE will hold hearings in the following locations on the following dates and times. Las Vegas, NV Desert Research Institute - Frank Rodgers Building 755 East Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, NV 89119 May 9, 2011, 5:30 p.m.�9:30 p.m. Idaho Falls, ID Shilo Inn Suites Hotel 780 Lindsay Boulevard, Idaho Falls, ID 83402 May 11, 2011, 5:30 p.m.�9:30 p.m.

118

PSH-12-0033 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0033 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 27, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of nine arrests, seven of which were alcohol-related. In addition, the Individual had provided inaccurate and incomplete information to security officials during his background investigation. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual's credibility was suspect and therefore concluded that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0033.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-13-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

119

PSH-12-0106- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On December 13, 2012, a Hearing Officer determined that an individuals security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had...

120

PSH-13-0015- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On May 20, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individuals security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

PSH-13-0053- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On July 15, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual should not have an access authorization granted to him. In reaching this determination, the Hearing...

122

PSH-13-0072- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On November 6, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individuals security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had...

123

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Industrial Hygiene: Programs: Hearing  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hearing Conservation Noise sources at the Berkeley Lab are associated with, but not limited to, the Facilities and Engineering shops, mechanical rooms throughout the site, construction projects, and emergency generators. Engineering controls, such as enclosing noise sources (i.e., pumps, generators) and acoustical material (i.e., mechanical room walls and ceilings) are implemented when feasible. EH&S Industrial Hygienists evaluate high noise areas with sound level meters and noise dosimeters to determine if employees need to be enrolled in the Lab's Hearing Conservation Program. Employees enrolled in the Program receive a baseline audiogram and training and annually thereafter. Employees exposed to noise sources in excess of 85 decibels will be enrolled in the Program. Hearing protection must be made available

124

Fossil Energy FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing Fossil Energy FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing March 14, 2013 - 1:36pm Addthis Statement of Christopher Smith, Acting Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy before the House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development. Mr. Chairman, Madam Ranking Member, and Members of the Committee, it is my pleasure to appear before you today to discuss the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy's (FE) programs. Our fossil fuel resources are essential to the Nation's security and economic prosperity. The Office of Fossil Energy's primary mission is to ensure that the U.S. can continue to utilize those traditional fuel sources for clean, affordable, reliable energy. Technology development is critical to this mission. FE's Research and Development (FER&D) program

125

Notice of proposed rulemaking and public hearing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Notice of proposed rulemaking and public hearing Notice of proposed rulemaking and public hearing Notice of proposed rulemaking and public hearing The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) proposes to amend its existing regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The majority of the changes are proposed for the categorical exclusions provisions contained in its NEPA Implementing Procedures, with a small number of related changes proposed for other provisions. These proposed changes are intended to better align the Department's regulations, particularly its categorical exclusions, with DOE's current activities and recent experiences, and to update the provisions with respect to current technologies and regulatory requirements. DOE proposes to establish 20 new categorical

126

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed Services Committee,  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

House Armed Services Committee, House Armed Services Committee, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed ... Congressional Testimony FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed Services Committee,

127

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the House Appropriations Committee,  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

House Appropriations Committee, House Appropriations Committee, Energy and Water Development Subcommittee | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the ... Congressional Testimony FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the House Appropriations Committee,

128

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the House Appropriations Committee,  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

House Appropriations Committee, House Appropriations Committee, Energy and Water Development Subcommittee | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the ... Congressional Testimony FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the House Appropriations Committee,

129

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed Services Committee,  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

House Armed Services Committee, House Armed Services Committee, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed ... Congressional Testimony FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed Services Committee,

130

Applications:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Applications: Applications: ● Telecommunications: cell / smartphone; multi-party secure phone calls; videoconferencing; Voice over IP (VoIP) ● Banking and financial transactions: ATM, debit / credit card and e-Commerce ● e-Business; e-gaming; e-books; e-music; e-movies; e-gambling ● Wireless internet ● Electronic voting ● Facility and vehicle access ● Information exchange for government/defense

131

Social drive and the evolution of primate hearing  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...supplemented with sevoflurane or isoflurane gas. The use of such anaesthetics during...against interaural distance to generate residuals for subsequent analysis. Second, to...Avian hearing and the avoidance of wind turbines. Techical Report NREL/TP-500-30844...

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

HEAR2T and the Stanford Heart Network Stanford's Approach  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

intervention pro- gram could reduce the incidence of cardiac events (heart attack, bypass, etc.) by 40 their cardiovascular health and take action to reduce their risk for a heart attack or stroke. The Stanford HEART modelHEAR2T and the Stanford Heart Network Stanford's Approach SPRCHeart Healthy Communities (continued

Ford, James

133

PSH-12-0131 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing 1 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0131 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing On March 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. The Individual had a history of two alcohol-related arrests and an alcohol-related incident at work. A DOE Psychologist found that the individual habitually used alcohol to excess. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual these security concerns at the hearing by presenting evidence that he had more than fully complied with the DOE Psychologist's treatment recommendations and the compelling testimony of his treating counselor. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0131.pdf More Documents & Publications

134

PSH-11-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 12, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual=s access authorization should not be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not resolved the security concerns arising from his illegal drug use, alcohol use, and misrepresentations made during the process regarding his eligibility for access authorization. At the hearing, the Individual did not present any evidence to rebut any of the allegations. He did testify that he stopped drinking alcohol in June or July of 2011, approximately six months prior to the hearing. The DOE psychologist, who diagnosed him as alcohol dependent, testified that this was an insufficient

135

PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 23, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that the DOE should not restore an individual's suspended DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred the individual administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including his April 2012 arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of Alcohol, as well as opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual met the criteria for alcohol abuse disorder and was a user of alcohol habitually to excess. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

136

PSH-12-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 22, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an Individual's DOE security clearance should be restored. The Individual had been caught viewing pornography on a DOE workplace computer. The Individual was examined by a DOE Consultant Psychologist who diagnosed the Individual with an Impulse-Control Disorder NOS. The Individual was, however, able to show that, as a result of therapy, his Impulse-Control Disorder is in remission with a low to low-moderate chance of relapse. For these reasons, the Hearing Officer concluded that the Individual had mitigated the security concerns at the hearing. Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer

137

PSH-13-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On May 23, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be granted. The Individual had a history of six arrests, five of which were alcohol-related and two of which were marijuana-related. In addition, A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol Dependence. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any the security concerns raised by his alcohol abuse and history of criminal conduct at the hearing, because he was only in the early stages of his recovery from his alcohol dependence, and his alcohol dependence was a contributing factor to much of his criminal conduct. The Hearing Officer

138

PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 23, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that the DOE should not restore an individual's suspended DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred the individual administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including his April 2012 arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of Alcohol, as well as opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual met the criteria for alcohol abuse disorder and was a user of alcohol habitually to excess. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

139

PSH-12-0092 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0092 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of five arrests, two of which were alcohol-related. The Individual's pattern of criminal activity included a sex offense against a minor, for which he was incarcerated for a period of over one year. In addition, A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol Dependence. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0092.pdf More Documents & Publications

140

PSH-13-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing Personnel Security Hearing (PSH-13-0074). On September 19, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individual's access authorization. As a security concern under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, a Local Security Office cited the report of the DOE psychologist, in which he concluded that the individual met criteria found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV-TR (DSM-IV-TR) for Opioid Dependence, and that this condition causes, or may cause, a significant defect in judgment and reliability. In accord with the hearing testimony of the DOE psychologist, the Hearing Officer found that there was a low risk that the individual's condition would, in

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

PSH-12-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

94 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 94 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 6, 2012, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his abuse of alcohol. The Hearing Officer further concluded that the individual's six months of responsible behavior regarding alcohol were insufficient to demonstrate a sustained pattern of responsible use. This was because of the brevity of the period of time involved, the individual's failure to admit that he had a drinking problem, and his failure to take steps to address the problem other than abstinence. The Hearing officer also concluded that

142

PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

08 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 08 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 6, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his alcohol use. Specifically, the Hearing Officer concluded that the individual, who had been diagnosed by a DOE psychiatrist with Alcohol Abuse, achieved adequate evidence of rehabilitation and reformation. In addition, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had satisfied the following mitigating factors as outlined in the Adjudicative Guidelines: (1) the individual acknowledged his alcohol abuse, provided evidence of actions taken to overcome his

143

PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 6, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his alcohol use. Specifically, the Hearing Officer concluded that the individual, who had been diagnosed by a DOE psychiatrist with Alcohol Abuse, achieved adequate evidence of rehabilitation and reformation. In addition, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had satisfied the following mitigating factors as outlined in the Adjudicative Guidelines: (1) the individual acknowledged his alcohol abuse, provided evidence of actions taken to overcome his

144

PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 6, 2012, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual should be granted a security clearance. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his alcohol consumption. Specifically, the Hearing Officer concluded that the individual's eight months of abstinence and AA attendance, along with the strength of his motivation to stop drinking and his ability to socialize with drinkers without feeling an urge to drink himself, and other factors, were sufficient to demonstrate rehabilitation from Alcohol Abuse. Robert Palmer - Hearing Officer

145

Fiscal year 1985 Department of Energy authorization (high-energy and nuclear physics). Volume II-B. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy Development and Applications of the Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session, February 22, 1984  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Volume II-B of the DOE authorization hearings for fiscal year 1985 covers testimony on high-energy and nuclear physics programs. The volume opens with a continuation of Appendix I, which contains questions directed at Dr. Alvin Trivelpiece and his responses on research at several laboratories and four construction projects. The latter include general plant projects, the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility, the Tandem/AGS Heavy Ion Transfer Line, and the University Accelerator Upgrade at the University of Washington and Yale. Two 1983 DOE/National Science Foundation reports make up Appendix II. The volume concludes with the text of the 1985 budget request for $746,105,000 and a breakdown of line item expenditures.

Not Available

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

Fiscal Year 1985 Department of Energy authorization (fossil energy, conservation and renewable energy). Volume III, No. 101. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Energy Development and Applications of the Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session, February 28, 29; March 1, 6, 7, 8, 1984  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Volume III of the hearing record covers six days of testimony by 34 witnesses representing DOE, energy industries, energy research institutions, and energy users, on the DOE budget for fossil energy, conservation, and renewable energy. Support for conservation and renewable energy sources, at $89.1 million and $190.8 million, establishes a stable funding level, while the overall budget supports a national policy of broadening the mix of energy technologies. Witnesses described new industrial processes, such as direct casting of steel and photovoltaic improvements for solar power generation. Tennessee Valley Authority spokesmen described progress in fluidized-bed combustion, and others told of work on fuel cells, gas technologies, and other projects.

Not Available

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

147

Department of Energy Authorization (supporting research and technical analysis) - fiscal year 1985. Volume VII-a. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy Development and Applications of the Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session, February 23, 1984  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Volume VII-A of the hearing record covers supporting material for the DOE research and development (R and D) budget. A panel of DOE witnesses, including Alvin Trivelpiece, Director of the Office of Energy Research, and panels of scientists from universities, laboratories, and industry described DOE-funded research programs for both basic and applied science. Trivelpiece gave an overview of 24 feature programs. One panel explained and defended the work at the Center for Advanced Materials at Sandia National Laboratories; while the chairman of the Energy Research Advisory Board and a member of the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Major Facilities in Materials Sciences testified about the materials sciences R and D and facilities. An appendix with questions and answers submitted for the record by Trivelpiece follows the testimony of the seven principal witnesses.

Not Available

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

Fred L. Brown | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fred L. Brown Fred L. Brown About Us Fred L. Brown - Deputy Director of Office of Hearings & Appeals Fred L. Brown Fred Brown is the Deputy Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). OHA is the quasi-judicial arm of DOE that conducts hearings and issues initial Departmental decisions with respect to any adjudicative proceedings which the Secretary may delegate. OHA's jurisdiction includes: deciding Freedom of Information and Privacy Act appeals; conducting administrative hearings and issuing Departmental decisions regarding personnel security clearance eligibility; conducting contractor employee "whistleblower" hearings and investigations; deciding applications for exception from DOE rules and regulations; and performing mediation services for the agency. Mr. Brown

149

Procedures Governing Appeals of Nonrenewal Decisions (approved by the Committee on Faculty Rights and Responsibilities, May 1998)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Procedures Governing Appeals of Nonrenewal Decisions (approved by the Committee on Faculty Rights and procedures adopted by the Board of Regents and appear in sections UWS 3.07 and 3.08 of the Wisconsin. Sections 7.07, 7.08, 7.09 and 7.10 of the UW-Madison Faculty Policies and Procedures [FPP] implement at UW

Sheridan, Jennifer

150

The beauty of the intricate shapes of spider webs fascinates people, but webs offer more than aesthetic appeal for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1937 The beauty of the intricate shapes of spider webs fascinates people, but webs offer more than aesthetic appeal for biological research. The silk fibers used to construct webs have long been a favorite spun by only a few species of spiders, all of which construct similar types of orb webs. Orb webs, flat

Blackledge, Todd

151

Agricultural science students' perceptions and knowledge of hearing loss  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

by Bunch (1937), noise at levels potentially damaging to the auditory system has been associated with agricultural activities for over 50 years. Tractors and the noise they generate were the primary focus of early studies (Bunch, 1937, Lierle and Reger.... The study suggests that crop duster pilots should be included in hearing conservation programs and should wear HPDs? (Lankford 2008, p. 1). 15 ?Since 1970 the Nebraska Tractor Test Center has measured sound levels, at the operator?s ear, of a...

Slaydon, Sunny Leigh

2009-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

152

Western Area Power Administration Record of Decision for the Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region 2004 Power Marketing Program, April 11, 1997  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 81 / Monday, April 28, 1997 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Hearings and Appeals Notice of Cases Filed; Week of February 3 Through February 7, 1997 During the Week of February 3 through February 7, 1997, the appeals, applications, petitions or other requests listed in this Notice were filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. Any person who will be aggrieved by the DOE action sought in any of these cases may file written comments on the application within ten days of publication of this Notice or the date of receipt of actual notice, whichever occurs first. All such comments shall be filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585-0107. Dated: March 3, 1997.

153

PSH-12-0100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a recent arrest for Aggravated Driving Under the Influence (DUI) and a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE Psychologist) that the individual suffered from Alcohol Dependence. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. The individual had abstained from the use of alcohol in the

154

PSH-12-0077 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

77 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 77 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0077 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 25, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding (1) diagnoses by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE Psychologist) that the individual suffered from Alcohol Dependence and Personality Disorder NOS; (2) the individual's history of problematic alcohol use; (3) prior criminal conduct of the individual; (4) evidence of the individual's financial irresponsibility; and (5) inconsistent information provided to DOE during the security clearance process. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer

155

PSH-12-0097 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0097 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 29, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had been charged with committing a sexual battery. Although the Individual had testified that a jury had acquitted him of this charge, the Individual did not provide any documentation that he had been acquitted. Nor had the Individual presented sufficient evidence to resolve the concerns raised by his conduct. The Individual had also intentionally provided misleading information during a personnel security interview. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing.

156

PSH-12-0101 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0101 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 21, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that it was too early to determine whether the individual had demonstrated a sustained pattern of financial responsibility for a

157

PSH-13-0083 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0083 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 21, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Record showed that the individual had a history of three alcohol-related arrests. A DOE Psychologist also diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Abuse. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not shown that he was reformed or rehabilitated from his Alcohol-Abuse. Nor had the individual mitigated the security concerns raised by his criminal activity since that activity was symptomatic of his Alcohol Abuse. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-13-0083.pdf More Documents & Publications

158

PSH-12-0104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's alcohol use. A DOE psychiatrist examined the individual and concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. His behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H and J. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that the individual had

159

PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 2, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through his two bankruptcies within ten years, his current debts, and his inability or unwillingness to live within his means. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security

160

PSH-12-0059 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

59 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 59 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0059 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. The Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about the individual's falsifications and financial irresponsibility. The individual's behavior raised concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. Specifically, she found that despite the individual's acknowledgment of his financially

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

PSH-12-0133 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0133 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about his misrepresentations and misuse of information technology. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual presented sufficient evidence to resolve the security concerns associated with his misuse of information technology. However, she found that the individual had not sufficiently mitigated the

162

PSH-12-0073 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

73 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 73 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0073 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 8, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's alcohol use. A DOE consultant psychologist found that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence, in early full remission. His behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H, J and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual demonstrated adequate evidence of rehabilitation and thus mitigated the security concerns under Criteria H and J. She

163

PSH-13-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 26 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In November and December 2012, as part of a background investigation, the local security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about the individual's pattern of criminal conduct. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate the security concerns associated with his three charges of Driving

164

PSH-12-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had resolved the security concerns arising from his alcohol use. The Individual was diagnosed by a DOE psychologist with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. In addition, the Individual had five alcohol-related incidents in his past, including a positive Breath Alchol Test (BAT) in March 2012. The hearing officer found that the Local Security Office (LSO) properly raised security concerns under Criteria H, J, and L.

165

PSH-13-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On May 1, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual should be granted a security clearance. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding foreign influence and foreign preference, and specifically regarding his multiple citizenships and foreign passports. The Hearing Officer based his decision on the individual's expressed willingness to renounce his foreign citizenships and refrain from using his foreign passports, the routine nature of his foreign holdings, the fact that the other countries of which the individual is a citizen have friendly

166

PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 11, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for providing false information on a Questionnaire for National Security Positions and failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within simited access areas. This behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F, G, and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, he

167

PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 2, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through his two bankruptcies within ten years, his current debts, and his inability or unwillingness to live within his means. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security

168

PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 4, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about falsification and drug use. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F, K and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, with respect to the individual's omissions on security forms, she found that the requisite element of "deliberateness" was

169

PSH-13-0069 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0069 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In April 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his positive drug test. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under the Bond Amendment and Criteria K and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer concluded the individual's use of his wife's prescription medication happened under unusual circumstances that are unlikely to recur in the future, and to the

170

PSH-12-0113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 18, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be granted. The Individual had a history of two alcohol alcohol-related arrests. In addition, A DOE Psychologist found that the Individual would consume four to six alcoholic beverages during an evening on a weekly basis. The Psychologist accordingly concluded that the individual habitually used alcohol to excess. The Hearing Officer found that, since the Individual continued to drink excessive amounts of alcohol, he had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. PSH-12-0113.pdf More Documents & Publications

171

PSH-13-0086 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0086 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 29, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. The Record showed that the individual had two DUIs and that a DOE Psychologist also diagnosed him with Alcohol-Abuse. After hearing the testimony of a DOE Psychiatrist that, in his expert opinion, the Individual was far enough along in his recovery to be reformed or rehabilitated from his Alcohol Abuse, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had shown that he was reformed or rehabilitated from his Alcohol-Abuse, and had therefore mitigated the security concerns raised by his Alcohol Abuse and criminal activity since that activity was symptomatic

172

PSH-13-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On May 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under Criteria J and L of 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited a DOE Psychiatrist's diagnosis of Alcohol Dependence, a history of heavy alcohol drinking, and three alcohol-related arrests and one arrest for possession of cocaine. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved the concerns related to his alcohol use as a result of his voluntary treatment following a 2012 relapse after nine years of sobriety. Mental health professionals' opinions at the hearing, as well as evidence of internal motivation and a

173

PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 1, 2012 a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with a the Individual's admission of alcohol misuse, a recent 2011 arrest of Driving While Intoxicated, and a diagnosis by a DOE-contractor psychologist (DOE Psychologist) of Alcohol Related Disorder. At the hearing, the Individual produced testimony indicating that he had completed an Intensive Outpatient Program, participated in an Alcoholics Anonymous program, and had been

174

PSH-12-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

52 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 52 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 2, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because of concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol and prior criminal activity. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. Specifically, he cited the fact that the individual had only recently begun receiving counseling with regard to his use of alcohol and had consumed alcohol as recently as four days prior to

175

PSH-12-0048 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

48 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 48 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0048 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 17, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual drank to intoxication once a week and had been diagnosed as suffering from Alcohol Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, which raised security concerns under Criteria H and J. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, he found that the individual's continued use of alcohol, in particular, his consumption

176

PSH-12-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 16, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with a July 2012 Driving While Intoxicated arrest and a Alcohol Abuse diagnosis by a DOE-Contractor Psychologist. At the hearing, the Individual submitted substantial evidence regarding his successful completion of an intensive outpatient program for his Alcohol Abuse and his intention to forever continue his abstinence from alcohol. The Individual also submitted testimony from others attesting to his changed attitude to alcohol and the

177

PSH-13-0064 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0064 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) cited concerns raised by the individual's use of alcohol habitually to excess and an opinion of a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual's lack of maturity leaves significant questions as to his judgment and reliability. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer did not find that the individual had an "illness or mental condition" that would raise a concern under the DOE regulations, but concluded that the individual had

178

PSH-12-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 1, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that the individual's recent efforts to resolve his debt have not yet withstood the test of time. Given the

179

PSH-12-0085 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

85 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 85 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0085 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 8, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding (1) false statements by the individual during the security clearance process; (2) the individual's problematic use of alcohol; (3) his use past use of illegal drugs. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to mitigate the security concerns raised by his use of illegal drugs, but not those stemming from his false statements and problematic use of alcohol.

180

PSH-11-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

03 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 03 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing Personnel Security Hearing (PSH-11-0003). On February 1, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not grant an individual's access authorization. A DOE consultant psychiatrist, noting that the individual drank to intoxication four times per month, found that the individual was a user of alcohol habitually to excess, and that this pattern of consumption indicated that the individual had an illness or mental condition that causes, or may cause, a significant defect in judgment or reliability. At the hearing in the matter, the individual testified that he had abstained from consuming alcohol since the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 15, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about falsification and drug use. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F, K and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve the security concerns associated with his marijuana use while in high school. However, she found that the individual had not sufficiently mitigated the security

182

E-Print Network 3.0 - aging hearing acuity Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Disorders How to contact us... : If you feel that you or your child has hearing or listening difficulties and would like a ... Source: Sainudiin, Raazesh - Department of...

183

E-Print Network 3.0 - adult hearing aid Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

but they can rarely remedy the situation completely... hearing aids and in varying listening environments. Together they are developing new knowledge... the physical and...

184

U.S. Department of Energy's Request for Hearing and Answer to...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

of Energy (DOE or Respondent) and Requests a Hearing and Answers the State of New Mexico Environment Department's (NMED) Administrative Order Requiring Compliance and...

185

Non-Lawyers' Guide to Hearings before the Colorado Ground Water...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lawyers' Guide to Hearings before the Colorado Ground Water Commission Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - Guide...

186

Broadening the Appeal of Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: Capturing Both Carbon Mitigation and Development Benefits of Clean Energy Technologies: Preprint  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Broadening the Appeal of Broadening the Appeal of Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: Capturing Both Carbon Mitigation and Development Benefits of Clean Energy Technologies Preprint Shannon Cowlin, Jaquelin Cochran, Sadie Cox, and Carolyn Davidson National Renewable Energy Laboratory Wytze van der Gaast JI Network Presented at the 2012 World Renewable Energy Forum Denver, Colorado May 13-17, 2012 Conference Paper NREL/CP-6A20-54487 August 2012 NOTICE The submitted manuscript has been offered by an employee of the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC (Alliance), a contractor of the US Government under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Accordingly, the US Government and Alliance retain a nonexclusive royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for US Government purposes.

187

REQUIREMENTS FOR WEB ACCESS FOR HEARING IMPAIRED 1 Requirements for Maintaining Web Access for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

REQUIREMENTS FOR WEB ACCESS FOR HEARING IMPAIRED 1 Requirements for Maintaining Web Access to computing, including the Web, is a dream come true for the hearing impaired. However, improved technology "Quality in Web Design for Visually Impaired Users" by Margaret Ross (Ross, 2002) describes the specifics

Berry, Daniel M.

188

In-air and underwater hearing sensitivity of a northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

In-air and underwater hearing sensitivity of a northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris) D for a female northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris). Hearing sensitivity in air was generally poor. Kastak and R.J. Schusterman Abstract: In-air and underwater sound detection thresholds were obtained

Reichmuth, Colleen

189

Low-frequency amphibious hearing in pinnipeds: Methods, measurements, noise, and ecology  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and the sea lions. In air, the harbor seal was most sensitive, followed by the older of the two sea lions the harbor seal hears almost equally well in air and under water; and c the elephant seal's auditory system hearing thresholds were obtained for one California sea lion Zalophus californianus , one harbor seal

Reichmuth, Colleen

190

MICHELLE MENTIS, Ph.D. Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 MICHELLE MENTIS, Ph.D. Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences Sargent College of Communication Disorders, Boston University, Boston, MA. 1989-2000 Associated Faculty, Ph.D. Program in Applied Africa EDUCATION 1988 Ph.D. in Speech and Hearing Sciences. Area of Specialization: Language Science

Guenther, Frank

191

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval Reactor Programs before the House Appropriations Committee, Energy and Water Development Subcommittee | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony on Nuclear ...

192

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval Reactor Programs before the House Appropriations Committee, Energy and Water Development Subcommittee | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony on Nuclear ...

193

DEVELOPMENT OF A SCREENING TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING YOUNG PEOPLE AT RISK FOR NOISE-INDUCED HEARING LOSS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING YOUNG PEOPLE AT RISK FOR NOISE-INDUCED HEARING LOSS Judith E. Widen, Ph.D. Chairperson Date approved: July 15, 2010 3 ABSTRACT This study surveyed common noise activities of young adults... such as hearing conservation training programs and provision of hearing protection devices for young people. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACCEPTANCE PAGE.......2 ABSTRACT..3 TABLE OF CONTENTS...

Megerson, Susan C.

2010-07-23T23:59:59.000Z

194

PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

43 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 43 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 28, 2012, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with her excessive consumption of alcohol in college and a determination from a DOE-contractor Psychologist (DOE-Psychologist), that, despite possessing good judgment and reliability, the Individual suffered from Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, and had been a user of alcohol habitually to excess in the past. To demonstrate adequate evidence of rehabilitation, the DOE Psychologist opined that the Individual would

195

PSH-12-0130 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0130 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's 2001 indictment for violation of a federal criminal statute governing conduct of federal employees, and security infractions that she committed in 2010 and 2011, while in her current position, when she brought a cell phone into a Controlled Access Area. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved the concern raised by the 2010 and 2011 security infractions, given her lack of intent, the isolated nature of the events, the fact that she received

196

PSH-13-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 9, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under Criteria H and J of 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited a DOE Psychiatrist's diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder and Alcohol-Related Disorder (Not Otherwise Specified), a history of annual alcohol intoxication, and an October 2012 event in which the individual self-treated his depression with sleeping pills and beer. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved the concerns related to his depression and inappropriate alcohol use as a result of his voluntary treatment following the October 2012

197

PSH-13-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In April 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use. During that PSI, the individual was referred to a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) for an agency-sponsored evaluation who concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H and J. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the

198

PSH-12-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

63 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 63 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office (LSO) suspended the individual's security clearance because (1) a DOE consultant psychiatrist diagnosed the individual as suffering from Alcohol Abuse/Dependence, (2) the individual had been arrested four times on alcohol-related charges and had received substance abuse treatment, and (3) the individual had a history of criminal behavior, of financial irresponsibility, and of failing to keep commitments made to the LSO. This derogatory information raised security concerns under Criteria H, J, and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

199

PSH-12-0123 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

23 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 23 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0123 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 15, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office cited the individual's filing of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition in 2002, and the individual's more recent financial difficulties, including a number of delinquent debts, the largest of which was a $132,489 mortgage balance, payments on which were over 150 days past due. The Hearing Officer found that, while the individual had made some progress toward paying off his prior debts, significant debts remained unpaid, including his mortgage, and the individual had, in addition,

200

PSH-13-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 26, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual's access authorization should not be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not resolved the security concerns arising from an opinion of a licensed medical professional that he has a mental condition which causes or may cause a significant defect in judgment and reliability and the Individual's past unreliable behavior. A DOE psychologist opined that the Individual has a mental trait that makes him unreliable. The Local Security Office (LSO) raised the DOE psychologist's opinion as a security concern under Criterion H of the Part 710 regulations. The LSO

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 28, 2012, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with her excessive consumption of alcohol in college and a determination from a DOE-contractor Psychologist (DOE-Psychologist), that, despite possessing good judgment and reliability, the Individual suffered from Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, and had been a user of alcohol habitually to excess in the past. To demonstrate adequate evidence of rehabilitation, the DOE Psychologist opined that the Individual would

202

PSH-12-0096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual's access authorization should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not resolved the security concerns arising from her diagnosis of Narcissistic Personality Disorder or her misuse of technology. The Individual was diagnosed by a DOE psychologist with NPD and Adjustment Disorder, with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. The DOE psychologist found that the NPD was an illness or mental condition which causes or may cause a significant defect in judgment or reliability. The Individual presented the

203

PSH-13-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 10, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In March 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use and alcohol-related incidents. During that PSI, the individual was referred to a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) for an agency-sponsored evaluation who concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Abuse. The individual's behavior raised security concerns Criteria H, J and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial

204

PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 5, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that access authorization should not be granted to an individual. A Local Security Office denied access authorization to the individual because she demonstrated financial irresponsibility through (1) failing to file federal and state income taxes for seven years, Tax Year (TY) 2004 through TY 2010; (2) accruing unpaid federal tax liability of $37,619.37 and unpaid state tax liability of $6,885.00; and (3) claiming nine tax withholding allowances when she knew she should only claim one. Her behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

205

PSH-12-0083 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

83 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security 83 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0083 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 14, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within limited access areas and for failing to report such non-compliance. This behavior raised security concerns under Criteria G and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security

206

PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 41 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 26, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The individual had a history of three arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. The individual also had two incidents at work involving alcohol. The individual also had a longstanding history of minor financial irresponsibility. A DOE Psychiatrist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Abuse/Alcohol Dependence and Cognitive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (CDNOS). The Hearing Officer found that the DOE Psychiatrist could not explain or defend either of his alcohol diagnosis's and that the DOE Psychiatrist was unwilling to conclude that the Individual's

207

Identification of hearing loss among residents with dementia: Perceptions of health care aides  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Effective communication can be difficult when working with individuals with dementia and hearing loss. Given the high prevalence of both dementia and hearing loss among individuals in long term care, direct care providers in this setting, will almost certainly confront frequent communication challenges. To understand health care aide perspectives of caring for residents with dementia and hearing loss, 12 health care aides from five nursing homes participated in audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were coded and themes were identified. Health care aides reported the difficulties in distinguishing the relative contributions of hearing loss and dementia to communication breakdowns. They reported that familiarity with residents helped them differentiate between sensory versus cognitive impairments in conversations with residents. Although able to identify strategies to support communication, communication difficulty complicated both their provision of care and support of quality of life for residents with dementia and hearing loss. Suggestions for practice and education are provided.

Susan E. Slaughter; Tammy Hopper; Carla Ickert; Daniel F. Erin

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

PSH-13-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 15, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under Criterion L of 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's dual citizenship, his holding a passport issued by his country of birth and substantial investments maintained in that country, and his availing himself of benefits available to citizens of that country. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved these concerns: the individual was willing to relinquish his foreign citizenship, no longer intended to renew his now expired foreign passport, and had transferred the majority of his

209

PSH-12-0066 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

66 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 66 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0066 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing A Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with a recent Driving Under the Influence arrest and a determination from a DOE-contractor Psychologist that the Individual suffered from Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. Additionally, while finding that the Individual had resolved Criterion L concerns relating to inaccurate answers provided in a background investigation, a Questionnaire for National Security Positions, and a personnel security interview, the

210

PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 26, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The individual had a history of three arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. The individual also had two incidents at work involving alcohol. The individual also had a longstanding history of minor financial irresponsibility. A DOE Psychiatrist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Abuse/Alcohol Dependence and Cognitive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (CDNOS). The Hearing Officer found that the DOE Psychiatrist could not explain or defend either of his alcohol diagnosis's and that the DOE Psychiatrist was unwilling to conclude that the Individual's

211

PSH-12-0079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 12, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because of concerns regarding the individual's prior use of heroin and an opinion of a DOE consultant psychologist that the individual suffered from Opiate Dependence and Learning Disorder Not Otherwise Specified. A Local Security Office cited this information as the basis for security concerns under the Bond Amendment and 10 C.F.R. Part 710. The Hearing Officer found that that the individual resolved the concern related to his use of

212

Noise source identification techniques: simple to advanced applications  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

required. Practical application examples ranging from hearing aids to wind turbines are presented to optimise the noise emission from a wide range of products including vehicles, household goods and windNoise source identification techniques: simple to advanced applications K.B. Ginn and K. Haddad Br

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

213

Saccular hearing; turtle model for a human prosthesis  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The saccule is a hearingorgan is some vertebrates thought to be responsive to substrate vibration (bone conduction) or low?frequency aerial sound. There was likely some overlap in these functions in the course of evolution after the sensory area to become the cochlea migrated from the saccule. That overlap is preserved in extant turtles by columella (stapes) saccular coupling via fibroelastic strands; thus both organs can respond to air conduction and bone conduction stimulation. Evoked potential data however reflect differential AC/BC drive to the inner ear. The columellas inertia provides the force to displace the saccular wall with the tympanum providing damping. Intense AC stimulation likely stimulates the human saccule. A proprietary stapedial saccular strut is described that serves as a surgically implanted coupling device for humans allowing more efficient use of AC saccular hearing in clinical deafness. The human saccular resonance is about 350 Hz which should allow for sufficient speech coding for intelligibility assuming connectivity to the auditory neuraxis. BC stimulation through audible ultrasound also likely activates the saccule in individuals with profound deafness. A stand?alone stapedio?saccular strut or one used in combination with an ultrasonichearing aid offers the potential of communication through saccular hearing.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

214

Microsoft Word - TFC-0009.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Support Operations, Office of Health, Safety and Security (Deputy Chief). Upon referral of this appeal from the Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Deputy Chief reviewed the...

215

TFC0005  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Support Operations, Office of Health, Safety and Security (Deputy Chief). Upon referral of this Appeal from the Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Deputy Chief reviewed...

216

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 8, 2003 July 8, 2003 VEE-0095 - In the Matter of OLS Energy-Camarillo This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the July 8, 2003 VEE-0092 - In the Matter of Cargill, Incorporated. This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the July 8, 2003 VEE-0091 - In the Matter of Jefferson Smurfit Corp. This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the July 8, 2003 VEE-0090 - In the Matter of Smurfitt Stone Container Corp.

217

The use of rhetorical appeals to convey a Christian world-view in Charles Williams' All hallows' eve  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Williams seemed to have no choice: having decided to hold to his I Christian world-view, Williams could not have imitated reality as he knew it without allowing at least three aspects of his novel to progress in a prescribed course. These aspects are... (Chairman of Ccnmittee) Paul A. Parri h (Member) David A. Wlandson (Member) David . Stewar (Head of Department) August 1984 The Use of Rhetorical Appeals to Convey a Christian World-View In Charles Williams' All Hallow's Eve (August 1984) Marilyn R...

Kok, Marilyn R

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

The Molecular Mechanics of Hearing and Deafness | Advanced Photon Source  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Cementing the Structure of CSHs Cementing the Structure of CSHs Self- and X-ray-Induced Crystallization of Supramolecular Filaments An Anti-Cancer Drug that Stunts Tumor Growth Metallic Glass Yields Secrets under Pressure The Structure of the "Swine Flu" Virus Science Highlights Archives: 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 2001 | 2000 | 1998 | Subscribe to APS Science Highlights rss feed The Molecular Mechanics of Hearing and Deafness APRIL 23, 2010 Bookmark and Share Cadherin-23 stretching simulations. A close-up view of the linker region between cadherin-23 repeats 1 and 2 is shown during a molecular dynamics simulation in which the protein is stretched from both ends. The simulations mimic in vivo conditions in which tip-link cadherins are

219

PSH-13-0012 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0012 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 17, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual should be granted authorization access. When the individual was 17 years old (2007), he was diagnosed with sudden onset diabetes (Type 1 - Insulin Dependent). While hospitalized to stabilize his diabetes, he was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder NOS. Three months later, immediately following a traumatic telephone call with his girlfriend, he ingested a handful of over-the-counter medication in a suicide attempt. He was diagnosed with "Depression NOS." The individual disclosed his history of treatment for psychological disorders when he applied for access authorization four-and-one-half years later. A DOE

220

PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In February and April 2012, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted Personnel Security Interviews (PSIs) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use, drug use and falsifications. In addition to the PSIs, the LSO recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in May 2012 and determined that he suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist also reported that the individual had been previously

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In February and April 2012, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted Personnel Security Interviews (PSIs) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use, drug use and falsifications. In addition to the PSIs, the LSO recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in May 2012 and determined that he suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist also reported that the individual had been previously

222

PSH-12-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

37 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 37 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor in a position that requires a DOE security clearance. Based upon the receipt of derogatory information relating to an unpaid debt, the Local Security Office (LSO) called the Individual in for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Ex. 7. After the PSI, the LSO informed the Individual that unresolved derogatory information created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for access authorization. Notification Letter dated March 5, 2012; DOE Ex. 1; 10 C.F.R. § 710.8(l) (Criterion L). PSH-12-0037.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0069 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

223

PSH-11-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a DOE contractor and was granted a DOE access authorization in 2007 after a Local Security Office (LSO) mitigated some derogatory information, including concerns about the individual's finances. Issues regarding the individual's finances surfaced again in 2010. After two Personnel Security Interviews, one in 2010 and the other in 2011, failed to resolve the derogatory information regarding the individual's finances, the LSO suspended the individual's access authorization and sought permission to initiate administrative review proceedings Affirmed (OS November 9, 2012) PSH-11-0026.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0121 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

224

PSH-12-0118 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0118 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On January 17, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual had incurred $20,000 in charges while patronizing a "gentleman's club" on a single evening; approximately $17,000 of that amount was charged to his corporate credit card. His employer's staff psychologists were concerned about the role of alcohol consumption in this incident. Following psychological evaluations, the individual was diagnosed as suffering from Alcohol Abuse. The LSO suspended his access authorization citing Criteria H, J and L. After conducting a

225

PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. Following the investigation by a DOE contractor that one of its managerial employees had engaged in sexual harassment and retaliation, the employee was disciplined and transferred to another position. The investigation concluded the individual had directed derogatory comments, epithets and slurs referencing sexual orientation towards subordinates (not thought to be gay); targeting such comments most heavily towards employees who were suspected of complaining to management about the work unit; directing subordinates not to speak to management with the individual's

226

VBH-0036 - In the Matter of Whistle Blower Hearing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

VBH-0036 - In the Matter of Whistle Blower Hearing VBH-0036 - In the Matter of Whistle Blower Hearing VBH-0036 - In the Matter of Whistle Blower Hearing XXXXXXX (the complainant) filed a complaint against his employer, Fluor Daniel, Inc. (FDI), and two other DOE contractors, Duke Engineering & Services (DE&S) and TRW Environmental Safety Systems (TRW), pursuant to the DOE's Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In that complaint, the complainant alleges that he suffered reprisals because he had made a disclosure that is protected by Part 708. vbh0036n.pdf More Documents & Publications VWZ-0009 - In the Matter of Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. VBU-0039 - In the Matter of Edward J. Seawalt VBH-0036 - In the Matter of Whistle Blower Hearing

227

PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. Following the investigation by a DOE contractor that one of its managerial employees had engaged in sexual harassment and retaliation, the employee was disciplined and transferred to another position. The investigation concluded the individual had directed derogatory comments, epithets and slurs referencing sexual orientation towards subordinates (not thought to be gay); targeting such comments most heavily towards employees who were suspected of complaining to management about the work unit; directing subordinates not to speak to management with the individual's

228

PSH-13-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 20, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. Following an anonymous report, the Human Reliability Program at the individual's site investigated a report that the individual had been found incoherent and naked at a local convenience store one morning at 2am by one of his co-workers. During this investigation, the individual's HRP certification was suspended. As the investigation was being completed, the individual's access authorization came due for a periodic re-investigation. During that investigation, the individual reported higher alcohol consumption than he had during the earlier Personnel Security

229

PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's history of criminal conduct, financial problems, and past use of alcohol habitually to excess. The LSO also cited the report of a DOE Psychologist, in which he identified the individual's lack of control over his spending and use of alcohol as a mental condition that causes a significant defect in his judgment and reliability. The Hearing Officer found that (1) the individual had not resolved the concerns raised by his problematic use of alcohol, as he had received no treatment in the six

230

PSH-12-0093 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0093 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual should be granted authorization access. A Local Security Office denied the individual a security clearance because (1) during the five-year period that the individual attended a university his use of alcohol regularly resulted in his intoxication, including at least 100 instances in which the individual either passed-out or blacked-out and two instances in which law enforcement officers were involved and (2) the individual had been diagnosed with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, by a DOE psychologist. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H and J.

231

PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's history of criminal conduct, financial problems, and past use of alcohol habitually to excess. The LSO also cited the report of a DOE Psychologist, in which he identified the individual's lack of control over his spending and use of alcohol as a mental condition that causes a significant defect in his judgment and reliability. The Hearing Officer found that (1) the individual had not resolved the concerns raised by his problematic use of alcohol, as he had received no treatment in the six months since being arrested for DWI, and had previously relapsed after

232

PSH-12-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision finding that the individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local DOE Office had referred the individual's request for a security clearance to administrative review under 10 CFR Part 710 citing the following information as security concerns: (1) an opinion in December 2011 by a DOE psychiatrist that the individual meets the criteria set forth in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association, 4th edition, Text Revised (DSM-IV-TR) for Alcohol Dependence, in partial remission; (2) a 2001 charge for public intoxication; and (3) admissions by the individual that he drinks to escape job-related stress; that his wife

233

PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual had suffered from Alcohol Dependence, which since had attenuated to Alcohol Abuse; the recommendation of the individual's primary care physician that the individual stop consuming alcohol and the physician's diagnoses of alcoholism, alcoholic hepatitis, liver damage, and type 2 diabetes; and statements by the individual regarding his use of alcohol and efforts at

234

PSH-13-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual had suffered from Alcohol Dependence, which since had attenuated to Alcohol Abuse; the recommendation of the individual's primary care physician that the individual stop consuming alcohol and the physician's diagnoses of alcoholism, alcoholic hepatitis, liver damage, and type 2 diabetes; and statements by the individual regarding his use of alcohol and efforts at

235

PSH-12-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual's present employer, a DOE contractor, has requested a DOE access authorization for the individual. The individual completed and submitted an Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations Processing (QNSP) in November 2011. DOE Exhibit 8. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the individual in January 2012. DOE Exhibit 9. In March 2012, a DOE-consultant Psychologist evaluated the individual, and memorialized his findings in a Psychological Assessment Report (the Report). PSH-12-0050.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-11-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

236

Colorado - C.R.S. 40-6-109 - Hearings | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Colorado - C.R.S. 40-6-109 - HearingsLegal Abstract This section outlines the procedure for...

237

Colorado - C.R.S. 36-1-131 - State Land Board Hearings - Rules...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Colorado - C.R.S. 36-1-131 - State Land Board Hearings - RulesLegal Abstract This section...

238

Colorado - C.R.S. 24-4-105(2)(a) - Hearings and Determinations...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Colorado - C.R.S. 24-4-105(2)(a) - Hearings and DeterminationsLegal Abstract This section...

239

PSH-12-0125- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On March 18, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individuals DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of three...

240

PSH-12-0132- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On March 4, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individuals access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

PSH-13-0101- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On February 12, 2014, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individuals authorization access should be granted. Prior to commencing work for a DOE contractor, the...

242

PSH-12-0126 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 26 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0126 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual tested positive on a random Breath Alcohol Test (BAT). The individual acknowledged that, since 2009, he would routinely drink to 18 12-ounce beers each weekend and has become intoxicated almost weekly. Subsequent to testing positive on the random BAT, the individual began to abstain from drinking all alcohol and commenced an intensive outpatient alcohol treatment program (IOP). At the conclusion of the IOP, the individual was evaluated by a DOE consulting

243

PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual had suffered from Alcohol Dependence, which since had attenuated to Alcohol Abuse; the recommendation of the individual's primary care physician that the individual stop consuming alcohol and the physician's diagnoses of alcoholism, alcoholic hepatitis, liver damage, and type 2 diabetes; and statements by the individual regarding his use of alcohol and efforts at

244

Whistleblower Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

in protected activity and that his employer, National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec ), subsequently terminated him. An Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing...

245

Hearing Outcomes After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Unilateral Intracanalicular Vestibular Schwannomas: Implication of Transient Volume Expansion  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic factors for hearing outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for unilateral sporadic intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas (IC-VSs) as a clinical homogeneous group of VSs. Methods and Materials: Sixty consecutive patients with unilateral sporadic IC-VSs, defined as tumors in the internal acoustic canal, and serviceable hearing (Gardner-Roberson grade 1 or 2) were treated with SRS as an initial treatment. The mean tumor volume was 0.34 {+-} 0.03 cm{sup 3} (range, 0.03-1.00 cm{sup 3}), and the mean marginal dose was 12.2 {+-} 0.1 Gy (range, 11.5-13.0 Gy). The median follow-up duration was 62 months (range, 36-141 months). Results: The actuarial rates of serviceable hearing preservation were 70%, 63%, and 55% at 1, 2, and 5 years after SRS, respectively. In multivariate analysis, transient volume expansion of {>=}20% from initial tumor size was a statistically significant risk factor for loss of serviceable hearing and hearing deterioration (increase of pure tone average {>=}20 dB) (odds ratio = 7.638; 95% confidence interval, 2.317-25.181; P=.001 and odds ratio = 3.507; 95% confidence interval, 1.228-10.018; P=.019, respectively). The cochlear radiation dose did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Transient volume expansion after SRS for VSs seems to be correlated with hearing deterioration when defined properly in a clinically homogeneous group of patients.

Kim, Young-Hoon [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Kim, Dong Gyu, E-mail: gknife@plaza.snu.ac.kr [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Han, Jung Ho [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Chung, Hyun-Tai; Kim, In Kyung; Song, Sang Woo [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Park, Jeong-Hoon [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Kim, Jin Wook; Kim, Yong Hwy; Park, Chul-Kee [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Kim, Chae-Yong [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Paek, Sun Ha; Jung, Hee-Won [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

246

TBA-0042- In the Matter of Curtis Hall  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Decision considers two Appeals of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on March 15, 2007, by a Hearing Officer in the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). The...

247

VBA-0061- In the Matter of Bernard Cowan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On July 18, 2002, Argonne National Laboratory-West (ANL or the contractor) filed an appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued by an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer...

248

VBA-0007- In the Matter of Salvatore Gionfriddo  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On October 13, 1999, Salvatore Gionfriddo (Appellant or Complainant) filed a Notice of Appeal from an Initial Agency Decision by a Hearing Officer from the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA)...

249

VBA-0011- In the Matter of Diane E. Meier  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On January 11, 2000, Diane E. Meier (Meier) filed a Notice of Appeal from an Initial Agency Decision by a Hearing Officer from the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy ...

250

About the Maritime Brain Tissue Bank All proceeds of the 2014 Molly Appeal will go towards the expansion of the Maritime  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

About the Maritime Brain Tissue Bank · All proceeds of the 2014 Molly Appeal will go towards the expansion of the Maritime Brain Tissue Bank, a critical resource for neuroscience researchers at Dalhousie Medical School. · Established in 1994 with a focus on Alzheimer's disease, the Maritime Brain Tissue Bank

Dellaire, Graham

251

FIA-15-0004- In the Matter of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On January 18, 2015, the Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a decision granting in part an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of...

252

FIA-14-0051- In the Matter of Tim Hadley  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On September 29, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of...

253

FIA-13-0001- In the matter of Daniel J. Gage  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On January 23, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision remanding an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Golden Field Office...

254

FIA-12-0060- In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On November 1, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy...

255

FIA-13-0010- In the Matter of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On March 20, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision remanding an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of Fossil...

256

FIA-13-0028- In the Matter of WyoFile  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On May 23, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the National Energy...

257

FIA-13-0035- In the Matter of Avery R. Webster  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On June 19, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a determination issued by the Office of Inspector General (OIG). The Appellant filed a...

258

FIA-13-0031- In the Matter of Avery R. Webster  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On June 19, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting in part and denying in part an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by...

259

FIA-13-0020- In the Matter of Avery R. Webster  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On April 25, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of Information...

260

FIA-14-0004- In the Matter of National Security Archive  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On January 28, 2104, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the National Nuclear...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

FIA-14-0012- In the Matter of Donna Deedy  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On February 18, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy...

262

EIA Cases  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

eia-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 eia-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en TEE-0073 - In the Matter of Cole Distributing, Inc. http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0073-matter-cole-distributing-inc TEE-0073 - In the Matter of Cole Distributing, Inc.

263

Project Title: Functional Measures of Sea Turtle Hearing ONR Award No: N00014-02-1-0510  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A t Project Title: Functional Measures of Sea Turtle Hearing ONR Award No: N00014 Moein Bartol Virginia Institute ofMarine Science ABSTRACT In this study, sea turtle hearing and species and physiologically by brainstem evoked potential techniques. Sea turtles employed in this work

264

PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. In June 2012, the individual was arrested and charged with Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated (DWI). Exhibits 7, 8. Because of the concern this arrest raised, a Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on July 30, 2012. Exhibit 16 (PSI Transcript). After the PSI, the LSO referred the individual to a local psychologist (hereinafter referred to as "the DOE Psychologist") for an agency-sponsored evaluation. The DOE Psychologist prepared a written report, setting forth the results of that

265

PSH-11-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual currently is employed by a DOE contractor, and that contractor has requested that he receive a DOE security clearance. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview with the individual in August 2011 (the 2011 PSI, DOE Ex. 8). In September 2011, a DOE-consultant psychologist (the DOE-consultant Psychologist) evaluated the individual, and memorialized her findings in a Psychological Evaluation Report (the Report, DOE Ex. 6). In October 2011, the LSO issued a Notification Letter to the individual, together with a Summary of Security Concerns (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information that created a

266

PSH-12-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. In 2007 through 2009, the individual provided inconsistent information to the Local Security Office (LSO) concerning his use of alcohol and failed to report an arrest that occurred in 2003. Because the LSO could not resolve these discrepancies and the reporting failure to its satisfaction, it determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a Notification Letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns and

267

PSH-12-0035 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

35 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 35 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0035 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed in a position that requires him to maintain a DOE access authorization, which he had been granted. See Ex. 3 at 1. On an August 2011 Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP), the individual disclosed a June 2007 vehicle repossession and a March 2010 wage garnishment for $2,000 that stemmed from a debt to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Ex. 4 at 8. He also disclosed a 2011 citation for No Proof of Registration. Id. at 7. In December 2011, the local security office (LSO) invited the individual to a personnel security interview (PSI) to explain his finances and his disclosures. PSH-12-0035.pdf More Documents & Publications

268

TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed at a Department of Energy (DOE) facility where his work requires him to have an access authorization. In September 2010, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address the individual's alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual. In November 2010, a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist) conducted a forensic psychiatric examination and concluded that the individual met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental

269

PSH-11-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization for anumber of years. Exhibit (Ex.) 18 at 8. During the period August 2009 through November 2009,the Individual went to his office in a secured building late at night during non-duty hours. Ex. 15.Further, the Individual had made several unauthorized purchases from his government-issuedcredit card during that period. Ex. 15. In explaining these events to his superiors, the Individual asserted that the incidents were a result of his experiencing a manic episode of his Bipolar Disorder. Ex. 15 at 7. This disclosure prompted the Local Security Office (LSO) to conduct aJanuary 2010 Personnel Security Interview (2010 PSI) with the

270

TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and held an access authorization until it was recently suspended. During a routine reinvestigation of the individual, he informed an Office of Personnel Management (OPM) investigator on February 16, 2011, that he had not filed federal or state income tax returns for several years. Exhibit 6 at 13. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on June 23, 2011. Exhibit 9. The LSO ultimately determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth

271

PSH-12-0027 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

27 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 27 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0027 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing In October 2011, pursuant to an investigation, the Local Security Office obtained the Individual's credit report. The credit report indicated that the Individual had a number of accounts either in collection or which were charged off. Exhibit (Ex.) 13 at 1-6. Consequently, the DOE facility's Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the Individual in January 2012. Ex. 19. The 2012 PSI failed to resolve the security concerns due to the Individual's excessive indebtedness. Consequently, the LSO, in a February 2012 notification letter (Notification Letter) informed the Individual as to the derogatory information that

272

PSH-12-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 21 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility. The Local Security Office (LSO) received information that the Individual had not filed a state income tax return for the year 2007. Exhibit (Ex.) 3 at 1. Consequently, LSO conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the Individual in October 2011. Ex. 7. Because the 2011 PSI failed to resolve the security concerns raised by the Individual's failure to file tax returns, the LSO informed the Individual, in a February 2012 notification letter (Notification Letter), that derogatory information existed which raised security concerns under 10 C.F.R. § 710.8 (l) (Criterion L) and that her security clearance was suspended. Ex. 1. The Notification Letter

273

PSH-12-0020 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 20 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0020 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a DOE contractor, and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. Based on financial issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) issued letters of interrogatory (LOI) to the individual in August 2009 and June 2011. DOE Exs. 18 and 16. The LSO also conducted Personnel Security Interviews (PSIs) with the individual in December 2010, November 2011 and December 2011. DOE Exs. 20, 21 and 22. In January 2012, the LSO issued the individual a Notification Letter, together with a Summary of Security Concerns (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information that created a substantial doubt about his eligibility to hold a DOE security clearance.

274

PSH-11-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held an access authorization for several years. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 6 at 1. Pursuant to an investigation, it was discovered that the Individual, for a second period of time, had not filed state or federal tax returns. Ex. 4 at 1-2. This discovery prompted the Local Security Office (LSO) to conduct a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the Individual in October 2011. Ex. 5. After conducting the October 2011 PSI with the Individual, the LSO informed the Individual in a November 2011 notification letter (Notification Letter) that derogatory information existed that raised security concerns under 10

275

TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor who has held a security clearance for several years. During a routine reinvestigation, the local security office (LSO) discovered that the individual had not filed federal taxes for the tax years 2008 and 2009. In July 2011, the LSO interviewed the individual during a Personnel Security Interview (PSI), but that interview did not resolve the security concerns. The LSO suspended his clearance and, in August 2011, the LSO informed the individual that it had received derogatory information that created a doubt regarding his continued eligibility for access authorization. See

276

TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, and was granted a security clearance in connection with that employment. During the process of applying for a higherlevel security clearance, the individual provided information to the DOE that is inconsistent with information that he previously provided. Because these inconsistencies raised security concerns, the local security office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview with a personnel security specialist in March 2011. After this Personnel Security Interview (PSI), the LSO referred the individual to a local psychiatrist (hereinafter referred to as "the DOE

277

PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing In September 2011, the Individual, a security clearance holder, was arrested for Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) and subsequently reported the arrest to the Local Security Office (LSO) at the DOE Facility where he worked. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 19. Neither a September 2011 personnel security interview (PSI) nor a DOE-Contractor Psychologist's (DOE Psychologist) examination and evaluative report of the Individual resolved the security concerns raised by his 2011 DWI arrest. Consequently, the LSO informed the Individual, in a January 2011 notification letter (Notification Letter), that derogatory information existed which raised security concerns under 10

278

TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual held a security clearance from 1990 until 2002 while working for government contractors and the federal government. In 2010, his present employer, a DOE contractor, requested DOE access authorization for the individual. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview with the individual in September 2010 (the 2010 PSI, DOE Ex. 10). In November 2010, a DOE-consultant Psychiatrist evaluated the individual, and memorialized her findings in a Report of Psychiatric Evaluation (the 2010 Report, DOE Ex. 4). In December 2010, the LSO issued a Notification Letter

279

PSH-11-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 13 at 2. In June 2011, the Individual was cited for Disorderly and Lewd/Immoral Indecent Conduct (Disorderly Conduct). Ex. 9 at 2; Ex. 8 at 1. This disclosure prompted the Local Security Office to conduct a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the Individual in July 2011 (07/2011 PSI). Ex. 14. After the PSI, the LSO referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychologist ("the DOE Psychologist") for an evaluation. The DOE Psychologist evaluated the Individual in August 2011 and issued an evaluative report concerning the

280

PSH-11-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. On September 8, 2011, the individual notified the DOE that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) began garnishing his wages in August 2011, due to his failure to file a 2006 federal tax return. Exhibit 7. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on September 28, 2011. Exhibit 7. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns and the reasons for

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

PSH-12-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The administrative review proceeding began with the issuance of a Notification Letter to the Individual. See 10 C.F.R. § 710.21. The letter informed the Individual that information in the possession of the DOE created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for a security clearance. Specifically, the Local Security Office (LSO) stated that the Individual had: (1) been diagnosed by a psychologist as suffering from Impulse-Control Disorder, an illness or mental condition of a nature which causes, or may cause, a significant defect in judgment or reliability; and (2) engaged in unusual conduct which brought his honesty, trustworthiness, and reliability into question by viewing pornography at work, providing

282

EV-Everywhere Wants to Hear from All of You! | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EV-Everywhere Wants to Hear from All of You! EV-Everywhere Wants to Hear from All of You! EV-Everywhere Wants to Hear from All of You! September 19, 2012 - 2:59pm Addthis As part of the EV-Everywhere Grand Challenge, we held a series of workshops to lay out the initiative. The most recent one in Washington, DC, explored ways to reduce energy consumption with improved vehicle design. | Photo courtesy of Roy Feldman. As part of the EV-Everywhere Grand Challenge, we held a series of workshops to lay out the initiative. The most recent one in Washington, DC, explored ways to reduce energy consumption with improved vehicle design. | Photo courtesy of Roy Feldman. David Danielson David Danielson Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy How can I participate? We want your ideas on defining what makes an EV affordable for the

283

PSH-12-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility. Exhibit (Ex.) 10 at 3. The Local Security Office (LSO) discovered that the Individual failed to list a 2004 Driving Under the Influence (DUI) arrest in a Questionnaire for National Security Positions form completed in October 2011. Ex. 10 at 10. The Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview with the Individual in January 2012 (2012 PSI) and, due to concerns arising from the Individual's admission of excessive alcohol use in the 2012 PSI, referred him for an examination by a DOE-contractor psychologist (DOE Psychologist). Ex. 12; Ex. 8 at 1. Because neither the

284

U.S. Distillate Market Testimony for New York Assembly Hearing  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Market Testimony for New York Assembly Hearing Market Testimony for New York Assembly Hearing 2/4/2000 Click here to start Table of Contents U.S. Distillate Market Testimony for New York Assembly Hearing U.S. Residential Heating Oil Prices Regional Residential Heating Oil Prices Selected State Residential Heating Oil Prices Spot Distillate & Crude Oil Prices (Prices thru Jan 31, 2000) Low Distillate Stocks Set Stage for Price Volatility PADD 1 (East Coast) Heating Oil Stocks Low New England & Mid-Atlantic Weekly Total Distillate Stocks Low World Crude Production Not Keeping Pace with Demand OECD Stocks Reflect S/D Imbalance Distillate Stocks Are Important Part of Northeast Winter Supply Distillate Problem Likely to be Resolved Soon, But Recurrence Possible East Coast Distillate Production

285

PSH-12-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a DOE contractor, and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. In late September 2011, the individual was arrested and charged with Careless Driving and with Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated (Aggravated DWI). DOE Ex. 6. When he reported these charges to his Local Security Office (LSO), the LSO conducted a Personnel Security Interview (2011 PSI) with the individual in October 2011. 2011 PSI, DOE Ex. 9. In November 2011, a DOE-consultant psychiatrist evaluated the individual, and memorialized his findings in a Report of Psychiatric Examination (the Report, DOE Ex. 4). PSH-12-0008.pdf More Documents & Publications

286

TSO-1103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual was hired by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor in 2009, and was granted a security clearance at the request of his employer. In September 2010, the individual was arrested for misdemeanor child abuse. In October 2010, the LSO conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the individual, but that interview did not resolve the security concerns. The LSO suspended the individual's clearance in February 2011, and the LSO informed the individual that it had received derogatory information that had created a doubt regarding his eligibility for access authorization. See Notification Letter (June 2011). The Notification Letter stated that the derogatory information regarding the individual falls

287

PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing In September 2011, the Individual, a security clearance holder, was arrested for Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) and subsequently reported the arrest to the Local Security Office (LSO) at the DOE Facility where he worked. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 19. Neither a September 2011 personnel security interview (PSI) nor a DOE-Contractor Psychologist's (DOE Psychologist) examination and evaluative report of the Individual resolved the security concerns raised by his 2011 DWI arrest. Consequently, the LSO informed the Individual, in a January 2011 notification letter (Notification Letter), that derogatory information existed which raised security concerns under 10

288

PSH-11-0034 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

34 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 34 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0034 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. DOE Ex. 3. In August 2011, the Individual timely reported to the Local Security Office (LSO) her arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of alcohol. DOE Ex. 10. The incident prompted a September 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Ex. 11. After the PSI, the LSO referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE psychiatrist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist evaluated the Individual in October 2011 and issued a report. DOE Ex. 8. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the Individual in a November 2011 Notification Letter that there

289

PSH-12-0058 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

58 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 58 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0058 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a DOE contractor in a position that requires him to hold a DOE security clearance. For more than seven years, the individual has experienced financial difficulties, which resulted in the Local Security Office (LSO) conducting three personnel security interviews with him. In March 2012, the LSO sent a letter (Notification Letter) to the individual advising him that it possessed reliable information that created a substantial doubt regarding his eligibility to hold a security clearance. In an attachment to the Notification Letter, the LSO explained that the derogatory information fell within the purview of one potentially

290

PSH-12-0002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

02 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 02 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual has been employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor since 1997, and has held a DOE access authorization for over 10 years. In October 2011, the individual tested positive for marijuana on a random drug test. The local security office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the individual in October 2011, and he admitted that he had used marijuana from 2007 to 2011 while in possession of a DOE security clearance. He also admitted that although he had certified on a January 2011 personnel security questionnaire that he had never illegally used a controlled substance while possessing a security clearance, he had

291

PSH-12-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed at a DOE facility where his work requires him to have an access authorization. In December 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address his alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in February 2012 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). According to the DOE psychiatrist, the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist further concluded

292

PSH-12-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

44 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 44 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility and has possessed a security clearance on various occasions since 1978. Exhibit (Ex.) 8 at 2. In December 2011, the Individual reported to the Local Security Office (LSO) that his wages were being garnished for back federal taxes. Ex. 13 at 1. Consequently, the LSO conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the Individual in January 2012. Ex. 15. Because the PSI and further investigation indicated that the Individual had not filed state and federal tax returns for several years and had a number of delinquent financial accounts, the LSO informed the Individual in a March 2012 notification

293

TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. He provided inconsistent information on four separate occasions to the Local Security Office (LSO) concerning his diagnosis and treatment for mental health issues: in his responses to two Questionnaires for National Security Positions (QNSPs) in 2003 and 2009, during a background investigation interview conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 2006, and during a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) in 2010. The LSO could not resolve these discrepancies to its satisfaction, so it referred the individual to a DOE

294

PSH-12-0046 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0046 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. During 2009 through 2011, the individual used hydrocodone other than as directed and was consuming increasing amounts of alcohol. In October 2011, he voluntarily admitted himself into a substance abuse program at a local hospital. Upon discharge from the hospital, a psychologist diagnosed the individual with alcohol and opioid dependence. Because this information raised concerns about the individual's continued eligibility for access authorization, the local security office (LSO) called him in for an interview with a personnel security specialist. After the Personnel Security Interview (PSI) failed to

295

PSH-12-0029 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

29 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 29 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0029 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor in a position requiring him to hold a DOE access authorization. DOE Ex. 3. In December 2010, while on disability leave due to a medical condition, the Individual voluntarily entered an inpatient substance abuse facility to receive treatment for alcohol dependence. DOE Ex. 8. The Individual reported his treatment to his management, who in turn informed the Local Security Office (LSO). DOE Ex. 10 at 8-9. This potentially derogatory information prompted a March 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Ex. 10. After the PSI, the LSO referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE

296

TSO-1105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual currently is employed by a DOE contractor, and has held a DOE security clearance for several years. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the individual in June 2011. PSI, DOE Ex. 6. In August 2011, the LSO suspended the individual's DOE security clearance and issued her a Notification Letter, together with a statement (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information that created a substantial doubt about the individual's eligibility to hold a DOE security clearance. (DOE Ex. 1). Specifically, the LSO alleges that the individual has raised a concern under 10 C.F.R. § 710.8(f) (Criterion F)

297

PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor. Based upon the receipt of derogatory information, the Local Security Office (LSO) called the Individual in for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI). As a result of the PSI, the Individual was referred to a local psychologist (the DOE psychologist) for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist prepared a written report setting forth the results of that evaluation. DOE Ex. 6. After reviewing the DOE psychologist's report, the LSO informed the Individual that derogatory information created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for access authorization. PSH-11-0018.pdf More Documents & Publications

298

TSO-1111 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 11 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1111 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The administrative review proceeding began with the issuance of a Notification Letter to the Individual. See 10 C.F.R. § 710.21. The letter informed the Individual that information in the possession of the DOE created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for a security clearance. Specifically, the Local Security Office (LSO) characterized this information as indicating that the Individual had engaged in unusual conduct which brought his honesty, trustworthiness, and reliability into question, and had been found by a psychologist to meet the criteria for alcohol abuse set forth in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (Text

299

TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, and has possessed a DOE accessauthorization for over twenty years. As a result of information that he disclosed to the DOE in connection withan arrest, the individual was asked for additional information at a Personnel Security Interview conducted in September 2001 (the 2001 PSI). Subsequently, the individual was referred to a psychiatrist (hereafter the "DOEConsultant Psychiatrist"), who conducted a psychiatric evaluation of the individual in March 2002. Following this evaluation, the individual's access authorization was suspended and in August 2002, the Manager of the DOE'slocal Operations Office issued a Notification Letter

300

PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor. Based upon the receipt of derogatory information, the Local Security Office (LSO) called the Individual in for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI). As a result of the PSI, the Individual was referred to a local psychologist (the DOE psychologist) for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist prepared a written report setting forth the results of that evaluation. DOE Ex. 6. After reviewing the DOE psychologist's report, the LSO informed the Individual that derogatory information created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for access authorization. PSH-11-0018.pdf More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and has held a security clearance at the request of her employer since 1991. In November 2009, the individual was apprehended after shoplifting at a local store and the local police department gave her a citation for shoplifting. She reported the incident to the local security office (LSO) and the LSO conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the individual in December 2009. The individual stated that she did not intentionally steal any items and that she would not repeat her actions. The LSO concluded that the security concern was mitigated because the incident occurred under

302

TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and has held a security clearance at the request of his employer since 2008. In August 2010, the individual tested positive for alcohol during an employment-related screening. He admitted consuming 10-12 beers the night before the test. The local security office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the individual in October 2010, wherein he admitted consuming at least one six-pack of beer nightly for the previous four years. The PSI did not resolve the security concerns regarding his alcohol use and the individual agreed to be evaluated by a DOE consultant-psychiatrist. In November 2010, a DOE consultant-psychiatrist

303

PSH-13-0097 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing 7 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0097 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI), with a personnel security specialist on June 4, 2013, in order to address issues raised by an information report that he had failed to meet his income tax obligations and had his wages garnished by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as a result. Exhibits 5, 8. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns

304

PSH-12-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual began his DOE-related job in August 2006. Ex. D at 19, 53, 70-71. In a September 2007 personnel security interview (PSI), the individual stated that he had been charged with Possession of Marijuana in December 1995 and Minor in Possession in July 2001. See Ex. 8 at 20, 78-79. On his September 2011 QNSP, he denied that he had ever been charged with or convicted of an alcohol or drug-related offense. Ex. 11. In a November 2011 Letter of Interrogatory, the local security office (LSO) asked the individual why he had not acknowledged his December 1995 charge for Possession of Marijuana and his July 2001 charge for Minor in Possession. Ex. 9. In response, the individual indicated that he had been charged with

305

PSH-11-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual currently is employed by a DOE contractor, and that contractor has requested that he receive a DOE security clearance. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview with the individual in May 2011 (the 2011 PSI, DOE Ex. 17). In July 2011, a DOE-consultant psychiatrist evaluated the individual, and memorialized her findings in a Psychological Evaluation Report (the Report, DOE Ex. 6). In October 2011, the LSO issued a Notification Letter to the individual, together with a Summary of Security Concerns (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information

306

PSH-12-0053 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

53 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 53 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0053 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization since 1980. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 6. In October 2006, after reviewing the Individual's credit report during a routine reinvestigation in connection with her security clearance, the Local Security Office (LSO) requested that the Individual participate in a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) in order to discuss concerns raised by the Individual's finances. DOE Ex. 14. The Individual's security clearance was continued at that time. DOE Ex. 6. During a subsequent routine reinvestigation of the Individual's security clearance in 2011, concerns regarding the Individual's delinquent accounts and outstanding judgments surfaced. The

307

PSH-12-0042 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

42 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 42 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0042 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing This case involves an Individual who failed to meet his financial obligations during the final years of his first marriage. The Individual reported the repossession of his motor vehicle and a home foreclosure to the Local Security Office (LSO) in 2008. The LSO subsequently conducted a series of three Personal Security Interviews (PSI) of the Individual, the most recent on February 1, 2012. Unable to resolve the security concerns raised by the Individual's failure to resolve his financial issues, the LSO initiated administrative review proceedings by issuing a letter (Notification Letter) advising the Individual that it possessed reliable information that created a substantial doubt regarding his eligibility to

308

PSH-12-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on November 9, 2011, Exhibit 4, in order to address issues surrounding his finances. Id. at 12-13. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns and the reasons for those concerns. Exhibit 1. The Notification Letter also informed the

309

PSH-12-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. In September of 2011, the individual informed his contractor, which in turn informed the local DOE security office (LSO), that he had been hospitalized for treatment of his depression and suicidal thoughts. Exhibit 15. The LSO summoned the individual for an interview with a personnel security specialist on September 20, 2011. Exhibit 22 (Transcript of Personnel Security Interview). After this Personnel Security Interview (PSI), the LSO referred the individual to a local psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist) for an agency-sponsored evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist prepared a written

310

The Catholic University of America, George Washington University, and American Universitys U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon 2013 Market Appeal Jury Feedback  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

CAPITOL DC CAPITOL DC POINTS APPROACH EQUALS EXCEEDS ECLIPSES 0-60% 61-80% 81-90% 91-100% A. LIVABILITY 1 Is the operation of the house's lighting, entertainment, and other controls intuitive? X 2 Does the design offer the occupant(s) a safe, functional, convenient, comfortable, and enjoyable place to live X 3 Are the unique needs and desires of the target client met by the design? X B. MARKETABILITY 1 Does the house demonstrate curb appeal, interior appeal, and quality craftsmanship? X 2 Do the house's sustainability features and strategies make a positive contribution to its marketability? X 3 Does the house offer a good value to potential homebuyers? X C. BUILDABILITY 1 Are the drawings and construction specifications of

311

[The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996] Ear & Hearing  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

[The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996] Ear & Hearing. Publication Type: [The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996] ISSN and in Sentences Olsen, Wayne O.; Van Tasell, Dianne J.; Speaks, Charles E. Author Information Section of Audiology

Allen, Jont

312

The stroke recovery groups at the USC Speech and Hearing Research Center  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The stroke recovery groups at the USC Speech and Hearing Research Center are for those people who have difficulty communicating as a result of a stroke. This problem is referred to as Aphasia. Do you in all Stroke Recovery Groups is FREE. There are also opportunities to participate in research studies

Almor, Amit

313

Hearing Loss Prevention Program and Procedures UW Environmental Health and Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

audiometric testing may be indicated. Ensure that employees who terminate work in positions requiring hearing of quieter equipment. Maintain equipment to minimize noise production. Post work areas that are designated employees are included in the audiometric testing program and that employees participate and receive

Wilcock, William

314

FIA-12-0028 - In the Matter of USA Today | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FIA-12-0028 - In the Matter of USA Today FIA-12-0028 - In the Matter of USA Today FIA-12-0028 - In the Matter of USA Today The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of Information Resources (OIR). The appellant filed a FOIA request for records pertaining to a loan guarantee application filed by the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC) for the American Centrifuge Project, and asked for expedited processing of the request. OIR denied the request for expedited processing, and USA Today appealed. In granting the Appeal, OHA cited court decisions finding sufficient urgency to grant expedited processing where there is a significant interest in quickly disseminating news regarding a subject currently under debate by

315

Evaluation of early hearing damage in personal listening device users using extended high-frequency audiometry and otoacoustic emissions  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Although sound exposure from personal listening devices (PLDs) could potentially lead to noise- ... hearing risk associated with the use of these devices is still unclear. In this study, ... evaluated in 35 young...

A. H. Sulaiman; R. Husain; K. Seluakumaran

2014-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

Shipboard Assessment of Hearing Sensitivity of Tropical Fishes Immediately After Exposure to Seismic Air Gun Emissions at Scott Reef  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A shipboard system for measurement of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) in fish was developed to investigate the effects on hearing in tropical reef fish after exposure to emissions from an air ... gun array used...

Mardi C. Hastings; Jennifer Miksis-Olds

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

317

Public Hearing, DOE Release of DUF6 Conversion Facility Draft Environmental Impact Statements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 2 PUBLIC HEARING 3 4 SUBJECT: DOE Release of DUF6 Conversion 5 Facility Draft Environmental Impact Statements 6 DATE: January 13, 2004 7 LOCATION: Department of Energy 8 Environmental Information Center 115 Memorial Drive 9 Paducah, Kentucky 42001 10 TIME: 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. 11 FACILITATOR: Darryl Armstrong 12 REPORTED BY: Amy S. Caronongan, RPR, CSR 13 14 15 16 17

318

TEE-0021, TEA-004, TEA-006, TEA-007  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 7, 2005 September 7, 2005 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Appeals Names of Cases: York International Corp. Carrier Corporation Lennox International, Inc. Dates of Filing: April 26, 2005 May 16, 2005 June 20, 2005 Case Nos.: TEE-0021 TEA-0004 TEA-0006 TEA-0007 On April 14, 2005, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE) granted exception relief to Nordyne, Inc. See Nordyne, Inc., 29 DOE ¶ 81,004 (2005) (Nordyne). The exception concerned split system central air conditioners and heat pumps having three to five ton cooling capacities and sold for use in manufactured housing. Under the terms of relief, Nordyne would have a four-year extension of

319

Hearing risk associated with the usage of personal listening devices among urban high school students in Malaysia  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Objectives To investigate listening habits and hearing risks associated with the use of personal listening devices among urban high school students in Malaysia. Study design Cross-sectional, descriptive study. Methods In total, 177 personal listening device users (1316 years old) were interviewed to elicit their listening habits (e.g. listening duration, volume setting) and symptoms of hearing loss. Their listening levels were also determined by asking them to set their usual listening volume on an Apple iPod TM playing a pre-selected song. The iPod's sound output was measured with an artificial ear connected to a sound level meter. Subjects also underwent pure tone audiometry to ascertain their hearing thresholds at standard frequencies (0.58kHz) and extended high frequencies (916kHz). Results The mean measured listening level and listening duration for all subjects were 72.2dBA and 1.2h/day, respectively. Their self-reported listening levels were highly correlated with the measured levels (Plistened at higher volumes also tend to listen for longer durations (P=0.012). Male subjects listened at a significantly higher volume than female subjects (P=0.008). When sound exposure levels were compared with the recommended occupational noise exposure limit, 4.5% of subjects were found to be listening at levels which require mandatory hearing protection in the occupational setting. Hearing loss (?25dB hearing level at one or more standard test frequencies) was detected in 7.3% of subjects. Subjects' sound exposure levels from the devices were positively correlated with their hearing thresholds at two of the extended high frequencies (11.2 and 14kHz), which could indicate an early stage of noise-induced hearing loss. Conclusions Although the average high school student listened at safe levels, a small percentage of listeners were exposed to harmful sound levels. Preventive measures are needed to avoid permanent hearing damage in high-risk listeners.

A.H. Sulaiman; K. Seluakumaran; R. Husain

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

320

Final_Testimony_7-29-2010_Hearing_Sonya_Baskerville.pdf  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sonya Baskerville Sonya Baskerville Manager of National Relations Bonneville Power Administration Before The United States House of Representatives Subcommittee on Water & Power Committee on Natural Resources Hearing On Investment in Small Hydropower: Prospects of Expanding Low-Impact and Affordable Hydropower Generation in the West July 29, 2010 1 Good morning, Madame Chairwoman. My name is Sonya Baskerville and I am the Manager for National Relations for the Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville). Bonneville is a Federal power marketing administration based in Portland, Oregon. I am pleased to appear today to describe how Bonneville works with its partner Federal agencies - the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation - to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Cochlear Implants for Children with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...congenital features) and the child is otherwise healthy. The lack of auditory input during the child's development has a minimal effect on his or her motor and social development during infancy. Thus, if infant hearing screening is not performed, the deafness is often unnoticed during this period, resulting... Foreword This Journal feature begins with a case vignette that includes a therapeutic recommendation. A discussion of the clinical problem and the mechanism of benefit of this form of therapy follows. Major clinical studies, the clinical use of this ...

Papsin B.C.; Gordon K.A.

2007-12-06T23:59:59.000Z

322

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 9, 1997 May 9, 1997 VEE-0037 - In the Matter of W. Gordon Smith Company On December 24, 1996, the W. Gordon Smith Company (Smith), filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its Application, Smith requests that it be temporarily relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be granted. April 9, 1997 VEE-0042 - In the Matter of Edris Oil Service, Inc. On March 5, 1997, Edris Oil Service, Inc. (Edris) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department

323

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 19, 1996 July 19, 1996 VEE-0030 - In the Matter of Lee Oil Company On July 19, 1996, Lee Oil Company (Lee), located in Greensboro, North Carolina, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Lee requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be granted. April 16, 1996 VEE-0021 - In the Matter of Jacobs Oil Company On August 16, 1996 Jacobs Oil Company (Jacobs) of Dysart, Pennsylvania filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals

324

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 1, 1999 December 1, 1999 VEE-0060 - In the Matter of Blakeman Propane, Inc. On May 11, 1999, Blakeman Propane, Inc. (Blakeman) of Moorcroft, Wyoming, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Blakeman requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. October 20, 1999 VEE-0059 - In the Matter of XXXX Oil Co., Inc. On April 26, 1999, XXXXXXXXXX Oil Co., Inc. (XXXXXXXXXX) of XXXXXXXXXX, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals

325

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

61 - 3270 of 26,777 results. 61 - 3270 of 26,777 results. Download VEE-0027- In the Matter of J. Enterprises, Inc. On June 11, 1996, J. Enterprises, Inc. (Enterprises) of Swansea, Massachusetts, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE).... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0027-matter-j-enterprises-inc Download VEE-0059- In the Matter of XXXX Oil Co., Inc. On April 26, 1999, XXXXXXXXXX Oil Co., Inc. (XXXXXXXXXX) of XXXXXXXXXX, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application,... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0059-matter-xxxx-oil-co-inc Download TEE-0061- In the Matter of Kirby Oil Company, Inc. On June 16, 2009, Kirby Oil Company, Inc. (Kirby Oil) filed an Application

326

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/ves0071.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

VES-0071 VES-0071 May 23, 2000 DECISION AND ORDER OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Stay Petitioner: Mississippi Power Company Date of Filing:May 1, 2000 Case Number:VES-0071 On May 1, 2000, the Mississippi Power Company, of Gulfport, Mississippi (Mississippi Power), filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy an Application for Exception and an Application for Stay pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Part 1003. The first request seeks "an exception to the EIA (Energy Information Administration) policy of public disclosure of certain EIA Form 861 (Annual Electric Utility Report for the Reporting Period 1999) material which the Company deems confidential and proprietary commercial and financial information.(1) Application for Stay at 1. The material at issue is

327

Whistleblower Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 4, 2000 October 4, 2000 VBB-0005 - In the Matter of Thomas Dwyer This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on July 24, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). October 2, 2000 VBA-0055 - In the Matter of Lucy Smith This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on July 11, 2000, involving a Complaint filed by Lucy Smith (Smith or the Complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor

328

VBB-0041 - In the Matter of John L. Gretencord | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 - In the Matter of John L. Gretencord 1 - In the Matter of John L. Gretencord VBB-0041 - In the Matter of John L. Gretencord This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on March 13, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filing dated April 27, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in this case. No modification to the appeal decision by the OHA Director is

329

VBB-0038 - In the Matter of Ann Johndro-Collins | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Ann Johndro-Collins 8 - In the Matter of Ann Johndro-Collins VBB-0038 - In the Matter of Ann Johndro-Collins This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on March 28, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filing dated May 16, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in this case. No modification to the appeal decision by the OHA Director is

330

FIA-12-0020 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District 20 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance FIA-12-0020 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance The Office of Hearings and Appeals granted a Motion for Reconsideration of part of a Decision we issued on March 23, 2012, relating to appeals filed by California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance (CANDO) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). In its Appeals, CANDO challenged the Loan Guarantee Program Office's (LGPO) application of Exemption 4 of the FOIA to withhold the names and other identifying information about contractors and sub-contractors listed in documents responsive to its request. With respect to the CANDO's appeal concerning

331

VBB-0005 - In the Matter of Thomas Dwyer | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

05 - In the Matter of Thomas Dwyer 05 - In the Matter of Thomas Dwyer VBB-0005 - In the Matter of Thomas Dwyer This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on July 24, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filing dated September 8, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in this case. No modification to the appeal decision by the OHA Director is

332

VBB-0021 - In the Matter of Eugene J. Dreger | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21 - In the Matter of Eugene J. Dreger 21 - In the Matter of Eugene J. Dreger VBB-0021 - In the Matter of Eugene J. Dreger This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) on June 27, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise the OHA appeal decision only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filings in this case, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in this case. No modification to the OHA appeal decision is therefore

333

Proposition of a damage?risk?number for hearing conservation purpose  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Standards dealing with hearing impairment due to noise exposure define risk in an ambiguous and not quantitative way. (See for example ISO/R 19991971 p. 6.) These definitions have been thrown on from statistical methods and involve by themselves computational procedures. In the proposition presented here it is suggested as a single number a function of the variables noise level exposure period personal sensibility age work period previous experience previous hearing damage and clinical illness tendency. Function is developed with statistical procedures according population distribution and individual characteristics. Number is given in percent but can be used in decimal form. The number will serve to qualify a worker fitness against noise in a certain task to establish noise hazards to men in a certain industrial or urban zone to determine exposure grade to traffic noise to establish decision criterion to industrial noise control or to fix premiums for insurance payment in case of a handicap or a loss of heating ability due to work.

F. Groenewold

1976-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Annual Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Annual Reports Annual Reports Annual Reports OHA Annual Reports Available for Download January 1, 2013 OHA 2012 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2011 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). Here are highlights for the past year: September 30, 2011 OHA 2011 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2011 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) September 30, 2010 OHA 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2010 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) September 8, 2009 OHA 2009 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2009 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) September 30, 2008 OHA 2008 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2008 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) September 30, 2007 OHA 2007 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2007 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals

335

Microsoft Word - 0068.TEE.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2010 4, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Case Name: Bowlin Travel Centers, Inc. Filing Date: March 10, 2010 Case No.: TEE-0068 Bowlin Travel Centers, Inc., filed an Application for Exception with the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). The firm requests permanent relief from its requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the Application should be denied. I. Background In the 1970's, Congress's lack of information about petroleum products impeded our nation's response to the oil crises.

336

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0076.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 June 28, 2002 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Green Mountain Energy Company Date of Filing: August 23, 2000 Case Number: VEE-0076 On August 23, 2000, the Green Mountain Energy Company (Green Mountain) of Austin, Texas, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Green Mountain requests an exception, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 1003, which, if granted, would have the effect of withholding from public release - either through regular publication by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) or through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552 -- data which the firm files with the DOE Energy Information Administration on Forms EIA-826 and EIA- 861.

337

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

701 - 17710 of 26,764 results. 701 - 17710 of 26,764 results. Download VEE-0030- In the Matter of Lee Oil Company On July 19, 1996, Lee Oil Company (Lee), located in Greensboro, North Carolina, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy. In its... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0030-matter-lee-oil-company Download VEE-0032- In the Matter of Thomas Oil Company On September 13, 1996, Thomas Oil Company (Thomas Oil) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Thomas... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0032-matter-thomas-oil-company Download VEE-0043- In the Matter of Greenville Automatic Gas Company On March 11, 1997, Greenville Automatic Gas Company (Greenville) filed an

338

tee0070.pdf  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

23, 2010 23, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: BSH Home Appliances Corporation Date of Filing: March 30, 2010 Case No.: TEE-0070 On March 30, 2010, BSH Home Appliances Corporation (BSH) filed an Application for Exception (Application) with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests temporary relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430, Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers and Freezers (Refrigerator Efficiency Standards). In its exception request, BSH asserts that the firm will suffer an undue hardship and inequity if required to adhere to the Refrigerator Efficiency Standards, codified at 10 C.F.R. § 430.32. If

339

FIA-14-0031- In the Matter of Rachel Cook  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On June 12, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of Legacy Management (LM...

340

Microsoft Word - FIC-13-0001  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Operations, HSS (Deputy Chief). Redelegation Order No. 00-024-02A, Section 1.9. Upon referral of this Appeal from the Office of Hearings and Appeals, the HSS's Office of...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Microsoft Word - TFC-0007  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Operations, HSS (Deputy Chief). Redelegation Order No. 00-024-02A, Section 1.9. Upon referral of this Appeal from the Office of Hearings and Appeals, the HSS's Office of...

342

FIA-14-0024- In the Matter of Martin Becker  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On May 8, 2014, The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied an Appeal filed by Martin Becker under the FOIA of a final determination issued by the Office of Information Resources (OIR). Mr....

343

FIA-14-0050- In the Matter of Southeastern Legal Foundation  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On October 6, 2014, the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied a Freedom of Information Act Appeal (FOIA) filed by Southeastern Legal Foundation (Appellant) of a...

344

FOIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

March 6, 2014 FIA-14-0015 - In the Matter of Bill Streifer On March 6, 2014, The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied an Appeal filed by Bill Streifer under the FOIA of a...

345

FIA-12-0008- In the Matter of Carter & Burgess, Inc.  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Director granted in part and denied in all other respects a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Appeal filed by Carter & Burgess, Inc., (Appellant).

346

FIA-14-0028- In the Matter of Martha J. McNeely  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On June 2, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energys Oak Ridge...

347

FIA-13-0076- In the Matter of Exchange Monitor Publications  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On January 16, 2014, the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Appeal filed by Exchange Monitor Publications (Appellant) of a...

348

FIA-14-0010- In the Matter of Exchange Monitor Publications  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On February 28, 2014, the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied a Freedom of Information Act Appeal (FOIA) filed by Exchange Monitor Publications (Appellant) of a...

349

WBU-14-0002- In the matter of James E. Doyle  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On June 24, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying Dr. James E. Doyles (Appellant) Appeal of the DOEs NNSA Whistleblower Program Managers (Manager) dismissal of...

350

WBA-13-0017- In the Matter of Edward G. Gallrein, III  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On August 20, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied an appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) that OHA issued on April 10, 2014, regarding a complaint of retaliation that Edward...

351

WBU-13-0005 - In the Matter of Sun Kim | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

05 - In the Matter of Sun Kim WBU-13-0005 - In the Matter of Sun Kim On April 8, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying Ms. Sun Kim's Appeal of...

352

WBU-14-0011- In the Matter of Dr. Paul M. Cole, Ph.D  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On November 3, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying a jurisdictional appeal filed by Dr. Paul M. Cole, Ph.D (Dr. Cole), a former Oak Ridge Institute for Science...

353

FIA-14-0085- In the Matter of Allegheny Defense Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On January 21, 2015, the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied a Freedom of Information Act Appeal (FOIA) filed by Allegheny Defense Project (Appellant) of a...

354

FIA-15-0001- In the Matter of Carolyn Epps  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On January 23, 2015, the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied a Freedom of Information Act Appeal (FOIA) filed by Carolyn Epps of two determinations issued by...

355

FIA-14-0052- In the Matter of Tim Hadley  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On September 19, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an Appeal from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of Information...

356

FIA-14-0038- In the Matter of Tim Hadley  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On June 24, 2014, the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied a Freedom of Information Act Appeal (FOIA) filed by Tim Hadley (Appellant) of a determination issued...

357

FIA-14-0064- In the Matter of Tri-Valley CAREs  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On October 7, 2014, The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied an Appeal filed by Tri-Valley CAREs (Tri-Valley) under the FOIA of a final determination issued by the National Nuclear Security...

358

FIA-14-0070- In the Matter of Torres Consulting & Law Group, LLC  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On November 20, 2014, the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied a Freedom of Information Act Appeal (FOIA) filed by Torres Consulting and Law Group, LLC ...

359

FIA-14-0086- In the Matter of Cheng Che Chen  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On January 21, 2015, the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied a Freedom of Information Act Appeal (FOIA) filed by Cheng Che Chen (Appellant) of a determination...

360

FIA-14-0015- In the Matter of Bill Streifer  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On March 6, 2014, The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied an Appeal filed by Bill Streifer under the FOIA of a final determination issued by the Office of Sciences Chicago Office. Mr....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Transcript of Public Hearing on DUF6 Conversion Facility Draft EISs, Held Jan. 7, 2004, Waverly, Ohio  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

- - - - - - Draft Environmental Impact Statements For the Construction and Operation of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facilities at the Paducah, Kentucky and Portsmouth, Ohio Sites - - - PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 7, 2004 - - - LOCATION: Pike County YMCA 400 Pride Drive Waverly, Ohio TIME: 6:00

362

Testimony of R. E. Smalley to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources; Hearing on sustainable , low emission,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, for example, hundreds of gigawatts of electrical power to be transported from solar farms in New Mexico1 Testimony of R. E. Smalley to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources; Hearing on sustainable , low emission, electricity generation, April 27, 2004 Energy is the single most important

363

When you hear the term "heart disease," what's your first reaction? Like many women, you may think, "That's a  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

When you hear the term "heart disease," what's your first reaction? Like many women, you may think, "That's a man's disease." But here's The Heart Truth: Heart disease is the #1 killer of Latinas in the United States. Together with stroke, heart disease accounts for a third of all deaths among Latinas

Bandettini, Peter A.

364

United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Testimony for the September 25, 2007 Hearing on  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and energy efficiency investments also contribute directly to energy security and to domestic job growth, 2007 Hearing on: Green Jobs Created by Global Warming Initiatives by Daniel M. Kammen Professor in the Energy and Resources Group (ERG) Professor of Public Policy in the Goldman School of Public Policy Co

Kammen, Daniel M.

365

Radiosurgery for Para-IAC Meningiomas: The Effect of Radiation Dose to the Cochlea on Hearing Outcome  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Purpose: This study was performed to assess the radiosurgical results of meningiomas extending into the internal acoustic canal (para-IAC meningiomas), with a particular focus on the effect of radiation dose to the cochlea on hearing outcome. Methods and Materials: A total of 50 patients who underwent radiosurgery for para-IAC meningiomas between 1998 and 2009, which were followed for 2 years, were enrolled. The mean age was 55.8 years (range, 15-75). The mean tumor volume was 6.1 cm{sup 3} (range, 1.0-19.0), the mean tumor length in the IAC was 6.9 mm (range, 1.3-13.3), and the mean prescribed marginal dose was 13.1 Gy (range, 10-15) at an isodose line of 50%. The mean follow-up duration was 46 months (range, 24-122). Results: Eight (16.0%) patients had nonserviceable hearing at the time of surgery. At the last follow-up, the tumor control rate was 94%; unchanged in 17 patients, decreased in 30 patients, and increased in 3 patients. Among 42 patients with serviceable hearing at the time of radiosurgery, it was preserved in 41 (97.6%) patients at the last follow-up. The maximal and mean radiation doses to the cochleae of these 41 patients were 5.8 Gy {+-} 0.3 (range, 3.1-11.5) and 4.3 Gy {+-} 0.2 (range, 2.2-7.5), respectively. The maximal dose to the cochlea of the patient who lost hearing after radiosurgery was 4.7 Gy. Conclusions: The radiation dose to the cochlea may have the minimal toxic effect on the hearing outcome in patients who undergo radiosurgery for para-IAC meningiomas.

Kim, Young-Hoon [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Kim, Dong Gyu, E-mail: gknife@plaza.snu.ac.kr [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Han, Jung Ho [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Chung, Hyun-Tai; Kim, In Kyung; Song, Sang Woo [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Park, Jeong-Hoon [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Kim, Jin Wook; Kim, Yong Hwy; Park, Chul-Kee [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Kim, Chae-Yong [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Paek, Sun Ha; Jung, Hee-Won [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of) [Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of); Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)

2012-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 - 1150 of 26,777 results. 41 - 1150 of 26,777 results. Download FIA-13-0021- In the Matter of Caldera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. On April 10, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy's... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0021-matter-caldera-pharmaceuticals-inc Download 30-Day Federal Register Notice- Extension http://energy.gov/cio/downloads/30-day-federal-register-notice-extension Download Application to Export Electric Energy OE Docket No. EA-258-D Brookfield Energy Marketing Inc.: Federal Register Notice, Volume 78. No. 213- Nov. 4, 2013 Application from Brookfield Energy to export electric energy to Canada. Federal Register Notice. http://energy.gov/oe/downloads/application-export-electric-energy-oe-docket-no-ea-258-d-brookfield-energy-marketing

367

Environmental Management Commission (Alabama)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Alabama Department of Environmental Management is charged with developing the state's environmental policy, hearing administrative appeals of permits, administrative orders and variances issued...

368

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

61 - 7470 of 29,416 results. 61 - 7470 of 29,416 results. Download TEE-0071- In the Matter of Monroe Oil Company On May 26, 2010, Monroe Oil Company (Monroe) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0071-matter-monroe-oil-company Download TEE-0061- In the Matter of Kirby Oil Company, Inc. On June 16, 2009, Kirby Oil Company, Inc. (Kirby Oil) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0061-matter-kirby-oil-company-inc Download CX-007506: Categorical Exclusion Determination Record of Categorical Exclusion for Bryan Mound Building BE-2 Drainage

369

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 - 3250 of 26,777 results. 41 - 3250 of 26,777 results. Download VEE-0020- In the Matter of Mercury Fuel Service, Inc. On April 9, 1996, Mercury Fuel Service, Inc. (Mercury) of Waterbury, Connecticut, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE).... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0020-matter-mercury-fuel-service-inc Download VEE-0028- In the Matter of Laney Oil Company, Inc. On June 18, 1996, the Laney Oil Company, Inc., (Laney Oil) of Monroe, North Carolina, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0028-matter-laney-oil-company-inc Download VEE-0040- In the Matter of Western Star Propane, Inc. On February 18, 1997, Western Star Propane, Inc. (Western) filed an

370

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 15, 2010 November 15, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: B&B Marine, Inc. Date of Filing: October 15, 2010 Case No.: TEE-0072 On October 15, 2010, B&B Marine, Inc. (B&B) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the request should be denied. 1 I. Background The DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) is authorized to collect, analyze, and disseminate energy data and other information. 15 U.S.C. § 772(b); 42 U.S.C. § 7135(b). The

371

P:\DECISION\0071.tee.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OHA Exception Decisions issued since July 5, 1995, are available on the OHA website OHA Exception Decisions issued since July 5, 1995, are available on the OHA website located at http://www.oha.doe.gov. The text of a cited decision may be accessed by entering the case number of the decision in the search engine located at http://www.oha.doe.gov/search.htm. June 11, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Monroe Oil Company Date of Filing: May 26, 2010 Case Number: TEE-0071 On May 26, 2010, Monroe Oil Company (Monroe) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product

372

P:\DECISION\0059.tee.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 U.S.C. § 772(b); 42 U.S.C. § 7135(b). 5 U.S.C. § 772(b); 42 U.S.C. § 7135(b). 2 See H.R. Rep. No. 373, 96th Cong., 1st Sess., reprinted in 1979 U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 1764, 1781 (H.R. Report 373). May 15, 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Sauder Fuel Inc. Date of Filing: April 28, 2009 Case No.: TEE-0059 On April 28, 2009, Sauder Fuel Inc. (Sauder), filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained

373

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

51 - 22460 of 26,764 results. 51 - 22460 of 26,764 results. Download VEE-0018- In the Matter of Lakes Gas Company On March 12, 1996, the Lakes Gas Company (Lakes) of Forest Lake, Minnesota, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0018-matter-lakes-gas-company Download VEE-0033- In the Matter of Nugent Motor Company On October 16, 1996, Nugent Motor company (Nugent) of Colebrook, New Hampshire, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0033-matter-nugent-motor-company Download VEE-0036- In the Matter of Kalamazoo Oil Co. On November 26, 1996, Kalamazoo Oil Co. (Kalamazoo), of Kalamazoo,

374

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIA Cases EIA Cases EIA Cases RSS February 14, 2011 TEE-0073 - In the Matter of Cole Distributing, Inc. On December 13, 2010, Cole Distributing, Inc. (Cole) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that Cole's request should be denied. February 14, 2011 TEE-0076 - In the Matter of Brodeur's Oil Service, Inc. On February 18, 2011, Brodeur's Oil Service, Inc. (Brodeur's) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of

375

Microsoft Word - 0073.tee.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 14, 2011 February 14, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Cole Distributing, Inc. Date of Filing: December 13, 2010 Case No.: TEE-0073 On December 13, 2010, Cole Distributing, Inc. (Cole) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that Cole's request should be denied. 1 I. Background The DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) is authorized to collect, analyze, and

376

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 - 3050 of 28,905 results. 41 - 3050 of 28,905 results. Download VEE-0013- In the Matter of O'Brian Oil Company On July 18, 1994 and November 22, 1995, O'Brian Oil Company (O'Brian) of Shellsburg, Iowa, filed Applications for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0013-matter-obrian-oil-company Download TEE-0072- In the Matter of B&B Marine, Inc. On October 15, 2010, B&B Marine, Inc. (B&B) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0072-matter-bb-marine-inc Download VEE-0018- In the Matter of Lakes Gas Company On March 12, 1996, the Lakes Gas Company (Lakes) of Forest Lake, Minnesota,

377

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

71 - 680 of 28,905 results. 71 - 680 of 28,905 results. Download Coordinating Interstate ElectricTransmission Siting: An Introduction to the Debate http://energy.gov/oe/downloads/coordinating-interstate-electrictransmission-siting-introduction-debate Download VEE-0027- In the Matter of J. Enterprises, Inc. On June 11, 1996, J. Enterprises, Inc. (Enterprises) of Swansea, Massachusetts, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE).... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0027-matter-j-enterprises-inc Download VEE-0060- In the Matter of Blakeman Propane, Inc. On May 11, 1999, Blakeman Propane, Inc. (Blakeman) of Moorcroft, Wyoming, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its...

378

Microsoft Word - 0069tee.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 5, 2010 April 5, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Severson Oil & LP Co., Inc. Date of Filing: March 23, 2010 Case No.: TEE-0069 On March 23, 2010, Severson Oil & LP Co., Inc. (Severson) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the request should be denied. I. Background The DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) is authorized to collect, analyze, and

379

Microsoft Word - 0076.tee.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

27, 2011 27, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Brodeur's Oil Service, Inc. Date of Filing: February 18, 2011 Case No.: TEE-0076 On February 18, 2011, Brodeur's Oil Service, Inc. (Brodeur's) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests temporary relief from its requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the firm's request should be denied. 1 I. Background The DOE's EIA is authorized to collect, analyze, and disseminate energy data and other

380

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 - 3950 of 28,560 results. 41 - 3950 of 28,560 results. Download TEE-0067- In the Matter of North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. On December 2, 2009, North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. (North Side) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0067-matter-north-side-coal-oil-co-inc Download VES-0071- In the Matter of Mississippi Power Company On May 1, 2000, the Mississippi Power Company, of Gulfport, Mississippi (Mississippi Power), filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy an Application for... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/ves-0071-matter-mississippi-power-company Download VEE-0044- In the Matter of Public Service Electric and Gas Company

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Microsoft Word - 0067.TEE.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 17, 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. Date of Filing: December 2, 2009 Case No.: TEE-0067 On December 2, 2009, North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. (North Side) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the request should be denied. 1 I. Background The DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) is authorized to collect, analyze, and

382

Microsoft Word - 0060.tee.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 30, 2009 June 30, 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: 7 Oil Co., Inc. Date of Filing: June 11, 2009 Case No.: TEE-0060 On June 11, 2009, 7 Oil Co., Inc. (7 Oil) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the request should be denied. 1 I. Background The DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) is authorized to collect, analyze, and

383

DOE hearing on the draft area recommendation report for the Crystalline Repository Project, Liberty High School, Bedford, Virginia: Session 2, March 24, 1986: Transcript of proceedings  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains a transcript of the comments of 10 witnesses. These meetings were held to hear public comments regarding the selection of a site for a second high-level nuclear waste repository. (TEM)

Not Available

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

DOE hearing on the Draft Area Recommendation Report for the Crystalline Repository Project, Liberty High School, Bedford, Virginia, Session 1: Transcript of proceedings  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains a transcript of the comments of 52 witnesses. These meetings were held to hear public comments regarding the selection of a site for a second high-level nuclear waste repository. (TEM)

Not Available

1986-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

385

VBD-0063- In the Matter of Bruce R. Field  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This determination will consider a Motion for Discovery filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) by Bruce R. Field (Field). This Motion, dated August 2, 2001, concerns the hearing...

386

VWD-0007- In the Matter of Linda D. Gass  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This determination will consider a Motion for Discovery filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) by Linda D. Gass. This Motion, dated August 10, 1999, concerns the hearing requested by...

387

LWX-0013- In the Matter of David Ramirez  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Decision supplements an Initial Agency Decision, dated March17, 1994, issued by the undersigned Hearing Officer of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy in a...

388

Impact of IRAQI invasion on United States energy and economic security. Hearing before the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, Second session  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains the Hearing before the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, Second Session, September 5, 1990 on the Impact of Iraqi Invasion on United States Energy and Economic Security. This hearing examines the long-term economic and energy security of the United States in relation to the Persian Gulf crisis and how to reduce our dangerous reliance on an unstable energy supply.

NONE

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

389

The use of narrative during the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill hearings October 11, 12, 13, 1991  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved as to style and content by: John H. Powers (Chair of Committee) Tarla R. Peterson (Member) Valerie Balester (Member) Martin J. Medhurst (Interim Head of Department) August.... John H. Powers There are any number of approaches that could be taken with subject matter with the richness and complexity of the Thomas-Hill Hearings. Therefore, I have limited this study to three main areas, they are: 1) the apparent turning over...

Willson, Marilee

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

390

We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon March 19, 2012 - 11:07am Addthis Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Erin R. Pierce Erin R. Pierce Digital Communications Specialist, Office of Public Affairs How can I participate? To join our live Q&A, visit twitter.com/energy on March 20 at 12 PM ET. Submit questions in advance by tweeting your question to @ENERGY using the #askENERGY hashtag. Have questions about our efforts to promote alternative fuels, advanced vehicles, and fuel efficiency? Then join us at 12PM ET on Tuesday, March

391

We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon March 19, 2012 - 11:07am Addthis Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Erin R. Pierce Erin R. Pierce Digital Communications Specialist, Office of Public Affairs How can I participate? To join our live Q&A, visit twitter.com/energy on March 20 at 12 PM ET. Submit questions in advance by tweeting your question to @ENERGY using the #askENERGY hashtag. Have questions about our efforts to promote alternative fuels, advanced vehicles, and fuel efficiency? Then join us at 12PM ET on Tuesday, March

392

Microsoft Word - 1116.tso.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: September 23, 2011 ) ) Case No.: TSO-1116 ) ___________________________________ ) Issued: March 23, 2012 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Valerie Vance Adeyeye, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual@) to hold an access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10

393

VBB-0037 - In the Matter of Gary Roybal | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

VBB-0037 - In the Matter of Gary Roybal VBB-0037 - In the Matter of Gary Roybal VBB-0037 - In the Matter of Gary Roybal This letter concerns the complaint of retaliation that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on June 14, 2001. That decision dismissed your complaint of retaliation on the grounds that your complaint has been substantially resolved, and you have already received a remedy that is at least equivalsnt to what you could have received under the Part 708 regulations. 10 C.F.R. § 708.17(c) (5) and (6). The Part 708 regulations applicable to your petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10

394

Mr. Thomas Dwyer  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Thomas Dwyer Thomas Dwyer 5007 Clarevalley Drive Cincinnati, OH 45238 Dear Mr. Dwyer: Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 OCT -4 2000 Re: OHA Case No. VBB-0005 This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on July 24, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filing dated September 8, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that

395

Gregory Kellam Scott, Esq.  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Kellam Scott, Esq. Kellam Scott, Esq. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 SEP 2 9 2000 Vice President and General Counsel Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site 10808 Hwy. 93, Unit B Golden, CO 80403-8200 Dear Mr. Scott: Re: Case No. VBB-0033 This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that Ms. Barbara L. Nabb submitted to the D~partment of Energy under 10 C.P.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on April 5, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.P.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you

396

VBB-0033 - In the Matter of Gregory Kellam Scott, Esq. | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Gregory Kellam Scott, Esq. 3 - In the Matter of Gregory Kellam Scott, Esq. VBB-0033 - In the Matter of Gregory Kellam Scott, Esq. This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that Ms. Barbara L. Nabb submitted to the D~partment of Energy under 10 C.P.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on April 5, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.P.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filings dated on July 3, 2000 and August 24, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in this case. No

397

VBB-0010 - In the Matter of David D. Powell, Jr. | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

VBB-0010 - In the Matter of David D. Powell, Jr. VBB-0010 - In the Matter of David D. Powell, Jr. VBB-0010 - In the Matter of David D. Powell, Jr. This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal submitted by Dr. Jagdish Laul to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued in that case on March 9, 2001. You submitte~ a Statement of Issues to be reviewed (Statement) on June 11, 2001. On July 10, 2001, Ms. Alene Anderson submitted a Response to your Statement on behalf of Dr. Laul. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). As discusoed below, you have not shown that extraordinary

398

Petition for Secretarial Review (Dismissed July 19, 2001)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

JUL 19 2001 JUL 19 2001 Mr. David D. Powell, Jr. Holland and Hart P.O. Box 8749 Denver, CO 80201-8749 Re: OHA Case No. VBB-0010 Dear Mr. Powell: This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal submitted by Dr. Jagdish Laul to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued in that case on March 9, 2001. You submitte~ a Statement of Issues to be reviewed (Statement) on June 11, 2001. On July 10, 2001, Ms. Alene Anderson submitted a Response to your Statement on behalf of Dr. Laul. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). As discusoed

399

Petition for Secretarial Review (Dismissed August 21, 2000)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ann Johndro-Collins Ann Johndro-Collins 1509 Amon Drive Richland, WA 99352 Dear Ms. Johndro-Collins: AUG 21 2000 Re: OHA Case No. VBB-0038 This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on March 28, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filing dated May 16, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in

400

Petition for Secretarial Review (Dismissed October 17, 2000)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Eugene J. Dreger Eugene J. Dreger P.O. Box 27050 Las Vegas, NV 89126-1050 Dear Mr. Dreger: OCT 1 7 2000 Re: OHA Case No. VBB-0021 This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) on June 27, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise the OHA appeal decision only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filings in this case, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

FIA-13-0017 - In the Matter of Partnership for Policy Integrity |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 - In the Matter of Partnership for Policy Integrity 7 - In the Matter of Partnership for Policy Integrity FIA-13-0017 - In the Matter of Partnership for Policy Integrity On March 28, 2013, The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) granted in part and denied in all other aspects an Appeal filed by Partnership for Policy Integrity (the Appellant) under the FOIA of two determinations issued by the DOE's Loan Guarantee Program Office (LGPO). PPI's request sought information concerning a loan guarantee application filed by a third party. On January 17, 2013, and on February 5, 2013, LGPO issued determination letters release a total of 80 documents to the Appellant. However, LGPO withheld portions of these documents under Exemptions 4 and 6. thes Appeal contended that LGPO's withholdings from six specific documents under

402

DOE's Program Regulating Liquefied Natural Gas Export Applications |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Regulating Liquefied Natural Gas Export Applications Program Regulating Liquefied Natural Gas Export Applications DOE's Program Regulating Liquefied Natural Gas Export Applications March 19, 2013 - 2:52pm Addthis Statement of Christopher Smith, Acting Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care, and Entitlements View the archived Congressional Hearing on YouTube Thank you Chairman Lankford, Ranking Member Speier, and members of the Committee; I appreciate the opportunity to be here today to discuss the Department of Energy's (DOE) program regulating the export of natural gas, including liquefied natural gas (LNG). Recent Developments in LNG Exports The boom in domestic shale gas provides unprecedented opportunities for the

403

Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): The effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12-hr work shift environment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An existing hearing conservation program (HCP), originally designed when an 8-hr work shift schedule was in effect, was evaluated at a plant site where a 12-hr work shift schedule is now utilized. The study included the following phases: a noise analysis of the work environment, HCP evaluation through the use of audiometric data base analysis (ADBA), applying ADBA procedures and a comparison of the shift in hearing threshold levels (HTLs) for the 8-hr and 12-hr work shifts, and an evaluation of the hearing protection devices (HPDs) being used at the facility over the 12-hr work shift by measuring temporary threshold shift (TTS). The mean measured employee time-weighted average (TWA) in the process area where the TTS study was conducted was 92 dBA. It was found that the existing HCP is at best marginal. The most likely causes of this less-than-desirable rating are inadequate audiometric testing procedures and inadequate HPD utilization. Furthermore, it was concluded that, at this time, the introduction of the 12-hr work shift has had no impact on the level of effectiveness of the HCP. In evaluating the three HPDs in use at the facility (3-M foam earplug, E-A-R foam earplug, and Bilsom Soft earplug), it was found that they all offered effective protection from noise at all audiometric test frequencies (0.5 to 6 kHz) except 0.5 kHz. All three HPDs exhibited TTS at 0.5 kHz with the TTS measured significant at the p less than 0.05 level for the E-A-R and 3-M wearer groups.

Reynolds, J.L.; Royster, L.H.; Pearson, R.G. (North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh (USA))

1990-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Notice of Public Hearings for the Proposed Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Inteconnect (DOE/EIS-0372) (09/12/05)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 Federal Register 6 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 175 / Monday, September 12, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [Docket No. PP-89-1] Notice of Public Hearings for the Proposed Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of public hearings. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces two public hearings on the ''Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect'' (DOE/EIS-0372). The Draft EIS was prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., the Council on Environmental Quality NEPA regulations, 40 CFR parts 1500-1508, and the DOE NEPA regulations, 10 CFR part 1021. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife

405

Polypropylene Foam Gains in Appeal  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Wire and cable manufacturers show interest in this product as an insulator for coaxial cable ... The initial market growth for polypropylene foam is as insulation for coaxial cable. ... Boston Insulated Wire & Cable Co. is presently the only commercial producer of foamed polypropylene coaxial cable. ...

1964-06-15T23:59:59.000Z

406

About Us | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

About Us About Us About Us Leadership Poli A. Marmolejos Director Office of Hearings and Appeals Poli A. Marmolejos currently serves as Director of the Department of Energy's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). OHA has jurisdiction for conducting administrative hearings and issuing decisions involving various matters, including personnel security and whistleblower complaints, and appeals brought under the Freedom of Information Act. Prior to joining OHA, Mr. More about Director Marmolejos Fred L. Brown Deputy Director of Office of Hearings & Appeals Fred Brown is the Deputy Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. More about Deputy Director Brown Janet N. Freimuth Chief of the Employee Protection and Exceptions Division Ms. Freimuth is the Chief of the Employee Protection and Exceptions

407

Application for Locally Adopted Energy Standards by the Sonoma County In Accordance With  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Building Energy Efficiency Standards in order to meet the minimum energy efficiency requirements), and 7D2 (Local Energy Efficiency Standards), of the Sonoma County Code, and Adopting by Reference) Section 7-3, Local appeals board and housing appeals board is revised to read: Sec. 7-3. - Local appeals

408

LSU's Executive Development Program Application for Admission  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: ______________________________________________(printed on your name badge) Work Email: _____________________________________ Cell Phone: _______________ Primary Phone: ________________________ Secondary Phone: _________________________ How did you hear about: ____________________________________ Email: ___________________________________ Phone number: ______________________________ Employment

409

Effects of ambient and boat noise on hearing and communication in three fish species living in a marine protected area (Miramare, Italy)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in a marine protected area (Miramare, Italy) Antonio Codarin a , Lidia E. Wysocki b , Friedrich Ladich b, Austria c Etho-ecology Marine Laboratory, Natural Marine Reserve of Miramare ­ WWF, Viale Miramare 349 Ambient noise Hearing a b s t r a c t The WWF-Natural Marine Reserve of Miramare (Trieste, Italy

Ladich, Friedrich

410

Testimony to the United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Legislative Hearing on America's Climate Security Act of 2007  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Testimony to the United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Legislative Hearing Fellow Engineering Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Good afternoon. Thank sector was responsible for 28% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2005 (USEPA, 2007a, table 2

411

Microsoft Word - 1004.TSO.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 23, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Hearing Officer's Decision Name of Case: Personnel Security Hearing Date of Filing: February 10, 2011 Case Number: TSO-1004 This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter "the Individual") to have his suspended access authorization restored. 1 After reviewing the testimony and evidence presented in this matter, it is my decision that the Individual's access authorization should not be restored. 2 I. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The regulations governing the Individual's eligibility are set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." Under Part 710, if derogatory information has been received regarding an individual

412

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

31 - 7440 of 29,416 results. 31 - 7440 of 29,416 results. Download EIS-0269: Record of Decision Long-Term Management and Use of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride, Paduch, Kentucky; Portsmouth, Ohio; and Oak Ridge, Tennessee http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0269-record-decision Download EIS-0283: Notice of Public Hearing on the Supplement to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Surplus Plutonium Disposition http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0283-notice-public-hearing-supplement-draft-environmental-impact-statement Download VEE-0081- In the Matter of North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. On February 25, 2002, North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. (North Side) of Milwaukee, Wisconsin filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of...

413

United States Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: ) ) Philips Lighting Company; ) Case Nos.: EXC-12-0001 GE Lighting; and ) EXC-12-0002 OSRAM SYLVANIA, Inc. ) EXC-12-0003 ) Filing Date: February 22, 2012 ) ____________________________________) Issued: April 16, 2012 _____________________ Decision and Order ______________________ This Decision and Order considers Applications for Exception filed by Philips Lighting Company (Philips), GE Lighting (GE) and OSRAM SYLVANIA, Inc. (OSI) (collectively, "the Applicants"), seeking exception relief from the applicable provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430, pertaining to Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards and Test

414

OHA 2007 ANNUAL REPORT FINAL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of of Hearings Hearings Appeals & FY 2007 Annual Report Doe/hg-0019 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Hearings Appeals & FY 2007 Annual Report Message from the acting Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 I. Areas of Adjudication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 A. Personnel Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B. Contractor Employee Protection Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 C. Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 D. Exception and Special Redress. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 E. The Crude Oil Overcharge Refund Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

415

Effects of Tidal Turbine Noise on Fish Hearing and Tissues - Draft Final Report - Environmental Effects of Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Snohomish Public Utility District No.1 plans to deploy two 6 meter OpenHydro tidal turbines in Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, under a FERC pilot permitting process. Regulators and stakeholders have raised questions about the potential effect of noise from the turbines on marine life. Noise in the aquatic environment is known to be a stressor to many types of aquatic life, including marine mammals, fish and birds. Marine mammals and birds are exceptionally difficult to work with for technical and regulatory reasons. Fish have been used as surrogates for other aquatic organisms as they have similar auditory structures. This project was funded under the FY09 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) to Snohomish PUD, in partnership with the University of Washington - Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center, the Sea Mammal Research Unit, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. The results of this study will inform the larger research project outcomes. Proposed tidal turbine deployments in coastal waters are likely to propagate noise into nearby waters, potentially causing stress to native organisms. For this set of experiments, juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) were used as the experimental model. Plans exist for prototype tidal turbines to be deployed into their habitat. Noise is known to affect fish in many ways, such as causing a threshold shift in auditory sensitivity or tissue damage. The characteristics of noise, its spectra and level, are important factors that influence the potential for the noise to injure fish. For example, the frequency range of the tidal turbine noise includes the audiogram (frequency range of hearing) of most fish. This study was performed during FY 2011 to determine if noise generated by a 6-m diameter OpenHydro turbine might affect juvenile Chinook salmon hearing or cause barotrauma. Naturally spawning stocks of Chinook salmon that utilize Puget Sound are listed as threatened (http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/ESA-Salmon-Listings/Salmon-Populations/Chinook/CKPUG.cfm); the fish used in this experiment were hatchery raised and their populations are not in danger of depletion. After they were exposed to simulated tidal turbine noise, the hearing of juvenile Chinook salmon was measured and necropsies performed to check for tissue damage. Experimental groups were (1) noise exposed, (2) control (the same handling as treatment fish but without exposure to tidal turbine noise), and (3) baseline (never handled). Experimental results indicate that non-lethal, low levels of tissue damage may have occurred but that there were no effects of noise exposure on the auditory systems of the test fish.

Halvorsen, Michele B.; Carlson, Thomas J.; Copping, Andrea E.

2011-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

416

Application Components  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A complete application consists of the following documents. Use this checklist to keep track of the required documents.

417

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 20, 1994 September 20, 1994 LEE-0163 - In the Matter of Pierce Oil Co., Inc. On September 20, 1994, Pierce Oil Co., Inc. (Pierce) of Price, Utah, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Pierce requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. September 16, 1994 LEE-0161 - In the Matter of Coker Oil, Inc. On September 16, 1994, Coker Oil, Inc. (Coker) of Lake City, South Carolina, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings

418

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0013.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hearing and Appeals Hearing and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: February 22, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0013 ) ______________________________________ ) Issued: June 7, 2012 ____________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ William M. Schwartz, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (the individual) to hold an access authorization (also called a security clearance) under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." 1 For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that the individual's security clearance should not be restored.

419

PETSc: Applications  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Applications and Publications Applications and Publications Home Download Features Documentation Applications/Publications Prizes Industrial/DOE sites DOE CSGF users Miscellaneous External Software Developers Site These are publications on application simulations developed by PETSc users. Please send us information about your publications, petsc-maint@mcs.anl.gov. How to cite PETSc in your publications. See Acknowledgments for software packages that PETSc uses. PETSc has been used for modeling in all of these areas: Acoustics, Aerodynamics, Air Pollution, Arterial Flow, Bone Fractures, Brain Surgery, Cancer Surgery, Cancer Treatment, Carbon Sequestration, Cardiology, Cells, CFD, Combustion, Concrete, Corrosion, Data Mining, Dentistry, Earth Quakes, Economics, Fission, Fusion, Glaciers, Ground Water Flow, Linguistics,

420

Arthur J. Dellinger, Sr. , nomination. Hearing before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, Ninety-Seventh Congress, Second Session, June 28, 1982  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A one-day confirmation hearing on the nomination of Arthur J. Dellinger, Sr. as DOE Deputy Inspector General (IG) focused on his ability and willingness to perform the duties and on his technical qualifications. The Deputy IG assists the IG in fraud detection and prevention, department audits to promote economy and efficiency, and policy recommendations. An informational statement covering his background, financial disclosure, and correspondence follows Mr. Dellinger's testimony. (DCK)

Not Available

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Notice of Availability of Plains & Eastern Clean Line Transmission Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Public Hearings: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 242- Dec. 17, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Plains & Eastern Clean Line Transmission Project (DOE/EIS0486; Draft EIS) for a 90-day public comment period. DOE also announces 15 public hearings to receive comments on the Draft EIS. In addition, DOE invites comments on the National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 process and any potential adverse impacts to historic properties from the proposed Project.

422

ARM - Field Campaign - Application of the ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) to  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

govCampaignsApplication of the ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) to Study the govCampaignsApplication of the ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) to Study the Aerosol Indirect Effects in China Campaign Links China Website Comments? We would love to hear from you! Send us a note below or call us at 1-888-ARM-DATA. Send Campaign : Application of the ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) to Study the Aerosol Indirect Effects in China 2008.05.15 - 2008.12.29 Website : http://www.arm.gov/sites/amf/hfe/ Lead Scientist : Zhanqing Li For data sets, see below. Description Aerosols in China have exceptionally high loading and diverse properties whose influence has been detected across the Pacific Rim. The rapid pace of changes in the atmospheric environment over China provides a natural testbed for identifying and quantifying the climatic effects of aerosols. Preliminary analyses of multiple satellite datasets (MODIS, TMI, TRMM)

423

Application Process  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

LPO has more than $40 billion in remaining loan and loan guarantee authority and is accepting applications under its two loan programs the Innovative Clean Energy Projects (Title XVII) loan...

424

Final environmental impact statement. Management of commercially generated radioactive waste. Volume 3. Public comments hearing board report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This EIS analyzes the significant environmental impacts that could occur if various technologies for management and disposal of high-level and transuranic wastes from commercial nuclear power reactors were to be developed and implemented. This EIS will serve as the environmental input for the decision on which technology, or technologies, will be emphasized in further research and development activities in the commercial waste management program. The action proposed in this EIS is to (1) adopt a national strategy to develop mined geologic repositories for disposal of commercially generated high-level and transuranic radioactive waste (while continuing to examine subseabed and very deep hole disposal as potential backup technologies) and (2) conduct a R and D program to develop such facilities and the necessary technology to ensure the safe long-term containment and isolation of these wastes. The Department has considered in this statement: development of conventionally mined deep geologic repositories for disposal of spent fuel from nuclear power reactors and/or radioactive fuel reprocessing wastes; balanced development of several alternative disposal methods; and no waste disposal action. This volume contains written public comments and hearing board responses and reports offered on the draft statement.

Not Available

1980-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

State Application Identifier Applicant Identifier  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. APPLICANT INFORMATION * Organizational DUNS: * Legal Name: Department: Division: * Street1: Street2: * City 4333 Brooklyn Ave Office of Research 17th floor Seattle King 98195-9472 Lynne Chronister 206

Kaminsky, Werner

426

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11 - 3920 of 28,905 results. 11 - 3920 of 28,905 results. Download HSS Focus Group Meeting (Topical Meeting) Safety Standards/10 CFR 851 Meeting agenda, summary and information package Meeting Date: July 17, 2008 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/hss-focus-group-meeting-topical-meeting-2 Download VWD-0007- In the Matter of Linda D. Gass This determination will consider a Motion for Discovery filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) by Linda D. Gass. This Motion, dated August 10, 1999, concerns the hearing requested by... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vwd-0007-matter-linda-d-gass Download Application to Export Electric Energy OE Docket No. EA-327-A DC Energy LLC: Federal Register Notice, Volume 77, No. 102- May 25, 2012 Application from DC Energy to export electric energy to Canada. Federal

427

Product Efficiency Cases  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

product-efficiency-cases Office of Hearings and product-efficiency-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en EXC-13-0004 - In the Matter of Liebherr Canada Ltd. http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/exc-13-0004-matter-liebherr-canada-ltd EXC-13-0004 - In the Matter of Liebherr Canada Ltd.

428

Microsoft Word - 1103.tso.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: September 1, 2011 ) ) Case No.: TSO-1103 ) ___________________________________ ) Issued: February 28, 2012 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Valerie Vance Adeyeye, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual@) to hold an access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part

429

Physics Applications  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Applications Applications Technetium-99m radioisotope generator developed at Brookhaven. Numerous physics-related programs at Brookhaven have yielded major advances in medicine and various technologies. Brookhaven's nuclear medicine program, which began in the 1950s, uses the Brookhaven Linac Isotope Producer to make radioisotopes for nuclear medicine diagnostics and treatment throughout the world. Today, more than 85 percent of all imaging examinations worldwide use one of the radioisotopes developed at Brookhaven. At Brookhaven's Center for Translational Neuroimaging, researchers can peer into a living brain through the use of various imaging modalities, including positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and optical imaging. Such research has led to a new understanding of

430

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

691 - 8700 of 28,905 results. 691 - 8700 of 28,905 results. Download TEE-0025- In the Matter of LG Electronics, Inc. This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by LG Electronics, Inc. (LG) seeking exception relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430, Energy Conservation Program for... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0025-matter-lg-electronics-inc Download EIS-0128-SA-01: Record of Decision Los Banos-Gates Transmission Project http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0128-sa-01-record-decision Download FIA-12-0051- In the Matter of William Berger On October 9, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy's National... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-12-0051-matter-william-berger

431

Case No. VBA-0032  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 November 26, 1999 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Roger H. Hardwick Date of Filing: July 26, 1999 Case Number: VBA-0032 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision issued on July 6, 1999, on a complaint filed by Roger H. Hardwick (Hardwick or the complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In his complaint, Hardwick seeks compensation for alleged retaliatory actions taken against him by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a DOE contractor, and by KenRob and Associates, Inc. (KenRob), his former employer under a subcontract with SAIC, as a result of making an alleged protected disclosure to DOE. In the Initial Agency Decision, however, the Hearing Officer determined that the complainant had failed to

432

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 - 16250 of 31,917 results. 41 - 16250 of 31,917 results. Download FIA-13-0017- In the Matter of Partnership for Policy Integrity On March 28, 2013, The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) granted in part and denied in all other aspects an Appeal filed by Partnership for Policy Integrity (the Appellant) under the FOIA of two... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0017-matter-partnership-policy-integrity Download Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 (State Department, 44 Fed Reg 65560) The following unified procedures issued by the State Department are established to satisfy the requirement of the Executive Order for implementing procedures concerning nuclear export activities of Federal agencies.

433

APPLICATION FOR ENTRY AUTUMN 2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

For information on the Higher Education Access Route (HEAR) for school leavers from socio, Institutes of Technology and further education colleges will provide information on courses For information on financial support for higher education log on to www.studentfinance.ie > > > Association

434

APPLICATION FOR ENTRY AUTUMN 2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

For information on the Higher Education Access Route (HEAR) for school leavers from socio, Institutes of Technology and further education colleges will provide information on courses on financial support for higher education log on to www.studentfinance.ie > > > Association for Higher

435

Proposed fiscal year 1985 budget request. Hearings before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session, February 7, 8 and 9, 1984  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Interior Secretary Clark, Energy Secretary Hodel, and representatives of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Synthetic Fuels Corporation, and the Forest Service testified at three days of hearings on the President's budget proposal for fiscal year 1985. The hearings were part of the preparation for a March 15 report to the Senate Budget Committee. The Department of the Interior's request for $6.49 billion is $100 million below the 1984 level, which Clark attributes to a review of policy, personnel, and process (decision making and operation). The DOE budget request is $15.1 billion, which includes $1.9 billion to acquire oil and transport it to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The hearing record includes the testimony and seven appendices with additional comments and responses submitted for the record.

Not Available

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

436

U.S. Department of Energys Request for Hearing and Answer to Administrative Order Requiring Compliance and Assessing a Civil Penalty  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The United States Department of Energy (DOE or Respondent) and Requests a Hearing and Answers the State of New Mexico Environment Departments (NMED) Administrative Order Requiring Compliance and Assessing a Civil Penalty (CO), HWB-14-21, relating to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP or Facility), and assessing a civil penalty for violations of the New Mexico Hazardous Waste Act (HWA), NMSA 1978, the Hazardous Waste Management Regulations, 20.4.1 NMAC (HWMR), and the Facility Permit, EPA I.D. Number NM4890139088-TSDF (Permit).

437

Application Acceleration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Acceleration Acceleration on Current and Future Cray Platforms Alice Koniges, Robert Preissl, Jihan Kim, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory David Eder, Aaron Fisher, Nathan Masters, Velimir Mlaker, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Stephane Ethier, Weixing Wang, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Martin Head-Gordon, University of California, Berkeley and Nathan Wichmann, Cray Inc. ABSTRACT: Application codes in a variety of areas are being updated for performance on the latest architectures. We describe current bottlenecks and performance improvement areas for applications including plasma physics, chemistry related to carbon capture and sequestration, and material science. We include a variety of methods including advanced hybrid parallelization using multi-threaded MPI, GPU acceleration, libraries and auto- parallelization compilers. KEYWORDS: hybrid

438

Ridefinders Application  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

23 23 (05-92) Ridefinders Application Please submit this application to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Employee Transportation Coordinator, Room 7A-156, Forrestal. U.S. Department of Energy Privacy Act Statement Check all transportation options which interest you: Carpool: Driver Share Driving Rider Vanpool: Driver Share Driving Rider Do you wish to meet your pool in your neighborhood? No (If no, see Alternate Pickup Locations below.) Yes Participation in the Federal Facility Ridesharing Program is voluntary and a private accommodation of employees rather than a Federal activity. Ridefinders Network will observe Privacy Act requirements because participation requires solicitation of personal information. The information collected will be used to maintain an accurate database of those individuals participating in the program and to provide individual ridematch lists

439

Case Number:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Name of Petitioner: Name of Petitioner: Date of Filing: Case Number: Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 JUL 2 2 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Dean P. Dennis March 2, 2009 TBA-0072 Dean D. Dennis filed a complaint of retaliation under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. Mr. Dennis alleged that he engaged in protected activity and that his employer, National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec ), subsequently terminated him. An Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer denied relief in Dean P. Dennis, Case No. TBH-0072, 1 and Mr. Dennis filed the instant appeal. As discussed below, the appeal is denied. I. Background The DOE established its Contractor Employee Protection Program to "safeguard public

440

FOIA Cases  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

foia-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 foia-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en FIA-13-0077 - In the Matter of John F. Garrity http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0077-matter-john-f-garrity FIA-13-0077 - In the Matter of John F. Garrity

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

WBU-14-0005 - In the Matter of Frank T. Clark | Department of...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

WBU-14-0005 - In the Matter of Frank T. Clark WBU-14-0005 - In the Matter of Frank T. Clark On November 14, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying...

442

Poli A. Marmolejos  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Poli A. Marmolejos currently serves as Director and Chief Administrative Judge of the Department of Energys Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). OHA has jurisdiction for conducting...

443

WBZA-13-0017- In the Matter of Edward G. Gallrein, III  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On April 10, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting two motions to dismiss the Part 708 Complaint filed by Edward G. Gallrein, III. Babcock & Wilcox Y-12,...

444

WBZ-13-0017- In the Matter of Edward G. Gallrein, III  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On April 10, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting two motions to dismiss the Part 708 Complaint filed by Edward G. Gallrein, III. Babcock & Wilcox Y-12,...

445

WBH-13-0017- In the Matter of Edward G. Gallrein, III  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On April 10, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting two motions to dismiss the Part 708 Complaint filed by Edward G. Gallrein, III. Babcock & Wilcox Y-12,...

446

Williams, Ronald L From: Kelliher. Joseph  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

The high court decided Tuesday it would not hear an appeal from five of Unocal's fellow oil companies and let stand a lower court ruling that upheld 14230 DOE01 5-1299 Unocal's...

447

Whistleblower Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Whistleblower Cases Whistleblower Cases RSS November 3, 2014 WBU-14-0011 - In the Matter of Dr. Paul M. Cole, Ph.D On November 3, 2014, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA)...

448

VBD-0059- In the Matter of Janet L. Westbrook  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This determination will consider a Motion for Discovery filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) by UTBattelle, LLC, the company that manages the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The...

449

VWD-0002- In the Matter of Frank E. Isbill  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This determination will consider two requests for discovery filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) on May 4, 1999, by Frank E. Isbill (the complainant). These requests (which have been...

450

VWD-0005- In the Matter of David M. Turner  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This decision will consider two Motions for Discovery filed by David M Turner with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE) on June 8, 1999, as amended on June 22,...

451

VWD-0003- In the Matter of David M. Turner  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This decision will consider two Motions for Discovery filed by David M Turner with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE) on June 8, 1999, as amended on June 22,...

452

United States Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: Washington State ) Fleet Operations ) ) Filing Date: November 13, 2013 ) Case No.: EXA-13-0001...

453

TBB-0040- In the Matter of Caroline Roberts  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This letter concerns the complaint of retaliation that you filed with the Department of Energy (DOE} under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. On March 24, 2006, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA} received...

454

TBB-0070- In the Matter of Sharon M. Fiorillo  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This letter concerns the complaint of retaliation that you filed with the Department of Energy (DOE) under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. On August 20, 2007, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) received...

455

FIA-14-0047 - In the Matter of Tim Hadley | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

7 - In the Matter of Tim Hadley FIA-14-0047 - In the Matter of Tim Hadley On August 10, 2014, the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a...

456

VWD-0006 - In the Matter of Lucy B. Smith | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - In the Matter of Lucy B. Smith VWD-0006 - In the Matter of Lucy B. Smith This determination will consider a Motion for Discovery filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals...

457

FIA-14-0006 - In the Matter of Southern Alliance for Clean Energy...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

06 - In the Matter of Southern Alliance for Clean Energy FIA-14-0006 - In the Matter of Southern Alliance for Clean Energy On February 3, 2014 the Office of Hearings and Appeals...

458

1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Samsung originally filed its submission as an Application for Samsung originally filed its submission as an Application for Waiver under 10 C.F.R. § 430.27. However, it has been determined that Samsung's request for relief is more appropriately considered as an Application for Exception under 10 C.F.R. Part 1003, Subpart B-Exceptions. Samsung has agreed to this procedural approach. See Memorandum of July 20, 2007 Telephone Conversation. Accordingly, we will consider its application under that Subpart and will refer to its submission as an Application for Exception or exception request. July 26, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Samsung Electronics America Date of Filing: July 16, 2007 Case Number: TEE-0047 This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception

459

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 - 21810 of 28,905 results. 01 - 21810 of 28,905 results. Download FIA-12-0066- In the Matter of Chadbourne & Parke LLP On November 8, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-12-0066-matter-chadbourne-parke-llp Download FIA-13-0016- In the Matter of Newport Partners, LLC On April 2, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Golden Field Office. The... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0016-matter-newport-partners-llc Article Summary of Decisions- July 15, 2013- July 19, 2013 Decisions were issued on:

460

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

61 - 13270 of 26,764 results. 61 - 13270 of 26,764 results. Download NO FEAR Act Notice The Department of Energy's notice for the No FEAR Act. To learn more about the No FEAR Act, visit this page. http://energy.gov/diversity/downloads/no-fear-act-notice Download FIA-13-0047- In the Matter of Brian Simmons On July 17, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying a consolidated appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Idaho... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0047-matter-brian-simmons Download FIA-13-0048- In the Matter of Ralph Stanton On July 17, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying a consolidated appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Idaho...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

31 - 20940 of 28,905 results. 31 - 20940 of 28,905 results. Download EA-176 Sempra Energy Trading Corporation http://energy.gov/oe/downloads/ea-176-sempra-energy-trading-corporation-0 Download FIA-13-0029- In the Matter of Post Register On June 12, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision remanding an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy's... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0029-matter-post-register Download FIA-13-0036- In the Matter of Sierra Club On June 25, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting in part an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0036-matter-sierra-club

462

FOIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 16, 2012 November 16, 2012 FIA-12-0069 - In the Matter of Mary Ann Parker On November 16, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Privacy Act determination issued by the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Office (ORO). Specifically, the Appellant, Mary Ann Parker, contested the adequacy of the ORO's search in response to her Privacy Act request, contending that additional records should have been provided and that records from a plant that she previously worked at, the Pinellas Plant, should have been sent to the Albuquerque Office. November 14, 2012 FIA-12-0070 - In the Matter of Robert Huber On November 14, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act

463

NERSC Applications Software  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

express equations and other expressions in familiar mathematical notation. Mathematica Matlab Chemistry Applications Chemistry applications are used for molecular dynamics,...

464

VEE-0091 - In the Matter of Jefferson Smurfit Corp. | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 - In the Matter of Jefferson Smurfit Corp. 1 - In the Matter of Jefferson Smurfit Corp. VEE-0091 - In the Matter of Jefferson Smurfit Corp. This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the provisions of 10 C.F.R. § 1003.20. See infra Appendix. These Applications concern annual revenues and sales data pertaining to each firm's sale of electricity that the DOE Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects through Form EIA-861, "Annual Electric Power Industry Report." EIA publishes this data, by state, in firm-specific form. The present exception request seeks to have the Applicants' data withheld as confidential. In their Applications for Exception, the Applicants incorporated an Application for Stay to prevent release of some of the

465

VEE-0092 - In the Matter of Cargill, Incorporated. | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 - In the Matter of Cargill, Incorporated. 2 - In the Matter of Cargill, Incorporated. VEE-0092 - In the Matter of Cargill, Incorporated. This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the provisions of 10 C.F.R. § 1003.20. See infra Appendix. These Applications concern annual revenues and sales data pertaining to each firm's sale of electricity that the DOE Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects through Form EIA-861, "Annual Electric Power Industry Report." EIA publishes this data, by state, in firm-specific form. The present exception request seeks to have the Applicants' data withheld as confidential. In their Applications for Exception, the Applicants incorporated an Application for Stay to prevent release of some of the

466

[applications CORNER]Fa-Long Luo and Arye Nehorai  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

that wind noise has two properties: 1) The energy of wind noise is mainly in the frequency band lower than 1 practical factors, the development and implementation of signal processing techniques for digital hearing and outlines three topics in signal processing techniques for hearing aids, namely, wind-noise reduction

Nehorai, Arye

467

DOE contract management. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session, February 17 and May 26, 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This hearing focuses on US DOE government contracts and the US DOE government contractors, with an emphasis on evidence of waste, mismanagement, and fraud. Testifying were the following individuals: M. Conley, Assistant Inspector General, DOE; J. Layton, Inspector General, DOE; H. O'Leary, Secretary, DOE; V. Rezendes, Energy and Science Issues, Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division, General Accounting Office.

Not Available

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

Neurosensory Hearing Loss in Secondary Adhalinopathy By K. Oexle', R. Herrmann', Catherine~ o d 8 ,F. ~eturc4,CII.Hiibner', 1.-C. Kaplan3,Y.~ i z u n o ~ ,E. Ozawa4,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in 'neurosensory hearing. Key words Limb-grdle muscular dystrophy (LGhID)- Non-syndromic recessive de&ess (NSRD-deficient LGhLD, subsequently termed LGLMD2C, has been linked to chromosome 13q12 (4, 5, 7);adhalin

Campbell, Kevin P.

469

Schiefelbusch Hearing Clinic  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

_______ Zip_____________ E-Mail Cell Phone (____)_____________ Day Phone (____)_______________ Evening Phone to Jane Wegner by email at jwegner@ku.edu or by phone at 864-4690. Camper Information Camper Name

470

FY 2013 Budget Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

By: Secretary Steven Chu, U.S. Department of Energy Before: The Senate Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development

471

?FY 2013 Budget Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

By: Secretary Steven Chu, U.S. Department of Energy Before: Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations U.S. House of Representatives

472

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-00-06078-TC TAIHEIYO KAIUN CO. LTD., a Japanese corporation in personam; GREEN ATLAS SHIPPING SA Japanese corporation in personam; OPINION GREEN ATLAS SHIPPING SA, a Panamanian corporation in personam." that reads as follows: "Of course, the state substance/federal procedure distinction applies in any case

Shamos, Michael I.

473

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;COUNSEL James M. O'Brien, Chicago, Illinois, for the petitioner. Andrea R. Tebbets, Washington, D property. . . . 4 MICROSOFT CORP. v. CIR #12;§ 927(a)(2)(B).1 Because we interpret this section's phrase." The requirements for qualification as a DISC in general

Shamos, Michael I.

474

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

subsequent stage of available judicial proceedings, including . . . proceedings for executive or other proceedings are authorized by the statute to represent these clients in state clemency proceedings Continuing Representation Under 21 U.S.C. § 848(q)(8) and to Set Immediate Date for Budget Conference

Kammen, Daniel M.

475

Mobil/Marathon takeover. Hearing before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Seventh Congress, First Session, November 19, 1981  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The exercise of corporate power and money as well as the effect on energy policy were the underlying issues in a hearing on the proposed merger of Mobil and Marathon oil companies. The use of capital in this way would deny funds for economic recovery and energy development at a time when the oil companies complain that they need more financial incentives. The companies' response in the direction of mergers suggest that deregulation and tax incentives are not developing solutions to energy supply, but are creating new problems. The witnesses included representatives of Ohio, DOE's Office of Competition, and independent oil jobbers and distributors, who argued against the merger. Additional letters and statement from the witnesses follow their testimony. (DCK)

Not Available

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

Energy security. Hearing before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, First Session, May 20, 1987  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

William F. Martin, Deputy Secretary of DOE, was the principal witness at a hearing held to review US energy security in light of the conflict underway in the Persian Gulf and the administration's failure to provide adequate solutions to oil import dependence, which threatens national security. Committee members faulted the President's report and recommendations as an inadequate response. Martin cited progress in diversifying energy supplies away from dependence upon the Persian Gulf by increasing worldwide use of coal and non-OPEC oil use which have dropped OPEC's market share 25 points to 40%. He also noted the increase in oil imports by Europe, Japan, and Third World countries. Points at issue were the differences between spot and contract prices, which have discouraged domestic production, and the dangers associated with concentrating world production in an unstable area.

Not Available

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

477

VEE-0088 - In the Matter of CPKelco Cogeneration, et al. | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

88 - In the Matter of CPKelco Cogeneration, et al. 88 - In the Matter of CPKelco Cogeneration, et al. VEE-0088 - In the Matter of CPKelco Cogeneration, et al. This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the provisions of 10 C.F.R. § 1003.20. See infra Appendix. These Applications concern annual revenues and sales data pertaining to each firm's sale of electricity that the DOE Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects through Form EIA-861, "Annual Electric Power Industry Report." EIA publishes this data, by state, in firm-specific form. The present exception request seeks to have the Applicants' data withheld as confidential. In their Applications for Exception, the Applicants

478

VEE-0090 - In the Matter of Smurfitt Stone Container Corp. | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

90 - In the Matter of Smurfitt Stone Container Corp. 90 - In the Matter of Smurfitt Stone Container Corp. VEE-0090 - In the Matter of Smurfitt Stone Container Corp. This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the provisions of 10 C.F.R. § 1003.20. See infra Appendix. These Applications concern annual revenues and sales data pertaining to each firm's sale of electricity that the DOE Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects through Form EIA-861, "Annual Electric Power Industry Report." EIA publishes this data, by state, in firm-specific form. The present exception request seeks to have the Applicants' data withheld as confidential. In their Applications for Exception, the Applicants

479

IB Peer Advisor Application Dear Applicant,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

IB Peer Advisor Application 2014-2015 Dear Applicant, Thank you for your interest in being an IB Peer Advisor for the 2014-15 academic year. These positions provide valuable opportunities for students all of the components of the peer advisor position before applying, · a one page application form

California at Berkeley, University of

480

DOMESTIC APPLICANTS ONLY Application for Admission & Scholarships  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DOMESTIC APPLICANTS ONLY Application for Admission & Scholarships Higher Degrees by Research (HDR of Information Technology (DIT) Doctor of Human Resource Management (DHRM) Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) Doctor of Veterinary Medical Science (DVetMedSc) Please note applicants applying for Master of Education

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Decision Summaries  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

oha/decision-summaries Office of Hearings and Appeals oha/decision-summaries Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014 http://energy.gov/oha/articles/summary-decisions-december-30-2013-january-3-2014 Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014

482

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0056.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 August 6, 1999 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner:Stacey Oil Co. Date of Filing:April 2, 1999 Case Number: VEE-0056 On April 2, 1999, Stacey Oil Co. (Stacey), of Whitefish, Montana, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Stacey requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA- 782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be granted for a temporary period. A. Background The EIA-782B reporting requirement grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979,

483

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0039.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 February 24, 2000 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Froman Oil Company Date of Filing: February 11, 1997 Case Number: VEE-0039 On February 11, 1997, Froman Oil Company (Froman) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Froman requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. I. Background The EIA-782B reporting requirement grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979,

484

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0045.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 August 4, 1997 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Patriot Petroleum, Inc. Date of Filing: July 14, 1997 Case Number: VEE-0045 On July 14, 1997, Patriot Petroleum, Inc. (Patriot) of Newburyport, Massachusetts, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Patriot requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. A. Background The EIA-782B reporting requirement grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979,

485

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0074.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 December 15, 2000 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: H.A. Mapes, Inc. Date of Filing: May 30, 2000 Case Number: VEE-0074 On May 30, 2000, H.A. Mapes, Inc., (Mapes) of Springvale, Maine, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Mapes requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be granted. A. Background Form EIA-782B is a mandatory reporting requirement which grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during

486

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0059a.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Octobeer 20, 1999 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner:XXXXXXXXXX Oil Co., Inc. Date of Filing:April 26, 1999 Case Number: VEE-0059 On April 26, 1999, XXXXXXXXXX Oil Co., Inc. (XXXXXXXXXX) of XXXXXXXXXX, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, XXXXXXXXXX requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be granted. Background The EIA-782B reporting requirement grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979,

487

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0036.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Kalamazoo Oil Co. Date of Filing: November 26, 1996 Case Number: VEE-0036 On November 26, 1996, Kalamazoo Oil Co. (Kalamazoo), of Kalamazoo, Michigan, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Kalamazoo requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. A. Background The EIA-782B reporting requirement grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979,

488

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0061.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 September 22, 1999 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Paul Smith Oil Company Date of Filing: May 24, 1999 Case Number: VEE-0061 On May 24, 1999, Paul Smith Oil Company (Smith) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Smith asks that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. A. Background The EIA-782B reporting requirement grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979,

489

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0064.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 May 30, 2000 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Belcourt Oil Company Date of Filing: July 23, 1999 Case Number: VEE-0064 On July 23, 1999, Belcourt Oil Company (Belcourt) of Belcourt, North Dakota filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its Application, Belcourt requests that it be relieved of the requirement to file Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. I. Background The EIA-782B reporting requirement grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979,

490

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0028.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

28 28 April 4, 1997 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Laney Oil Company, Inc. Date of Filing: June 18, 1996 Case Number: VEE-0028 On June 18, 1996, the Laney Oil Company, Inc., (Laney Oil) of Monroe, North Carolina, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Laney Oil requests relief from the obligation to file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have decided that the Application for Exception should be granted in part. A. Background Form EIA-782B is a mandatory report designed to collect monthly information on refined petroleum sales volumes and prices

491

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0060.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 December 1, 1999 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Blakeman Propane, Inc. Date of Filing: May 11, 1999 Case Number: VEE-0060 On May 11, 1999, Blakeman Propane, Inc. (Blakeman) of Moorcroft, Wyoming, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Blakeman requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. A. Background Form EIA-782B is a mandatory reporting requirement which grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during

492

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0055.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 September 22, 1999 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner:Wondrack Distributing Inc. Date of Filing:March 5, 1999 Case Number: VEE-0055 On March 5, 1999, Wondrack Distributing Inc. (Wondrack) of Tri-Cities, Washington, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Wondrack requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it respond to the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) survey entitled "Motor Gasoline Price Survey" (EIA- 878). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. Background The EIA-878 survey grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979, Congress found that

493

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0033.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 February 11, 1997 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Nugent Motor Company Date of Filing: October 16, 1996 Case Number: VEE-0033 On October 16, 1996, Nugent Motor company (Nugent) of Colebrook, New Hampshire, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Nugent requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. A. Background The EIA-782B reporting requirement grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979,

494

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0037.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 May 7, 1997 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner:W. Gordon Smith Company Date of Filing:December 24, 1996 Case Number: VEE-0037 On December 24, 1996, the W. Gordon Smith Company (Smith), filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its Application, Smith requests that it be temporarily relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be granted. A. Background Form EIA-782B is a mandatory report designed to collect monthly information on refined petroleum sales volumes and prices

495

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0080.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

80 80 July 13, 2001 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Potter Oil Co., Inc. Date of Filing: April 18, 2001 Case Number: VEE-0080 On April 18, 2001, Potter Oil Co., Inc. (Potter) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Potter requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. I. Background The EIA-782B reporting requirement grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979,

496

Sound Oil Company  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sound Oil Company Sound Oil Company file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/blackard/Desktop/EIA/LEE0152.HTM[11/29/2012 2:30:44 PM] DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Sound Oil Company Date of Filing: August 16, 1994 Case Number: LEE-0152 On August 16, 1994, Sound Oil Company (Sound) of Seattle Washington, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Sound requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied.

497

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0001.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 01 July 5, 1995 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Central American Petroleum Company Date of Filing: October 4, 1994 Case Number: VEE-0001 On October 4, 1994, Central American Petroleum Company (Central) of Cameron, Missouri, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its Application, Central requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. A. Background The EIA-782B reporting requirement grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979,

498

tee0012.pdf  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 DECISION AND ORDER OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Case Name: Electrolux Home Products, Inc. Date of Filing: July 19, 2004 Case Number: TEE-0012 This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by Electrolux Home Products, Inc. (EHP) seeking exception relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430, pertaining to energy conservation standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers and freezers (Refrigerator Efficiency Standards). In its exception request, EHP asserts that the firm would suffer a gross inequity if required to adhere to the Refrigerator Efficiency Standards, codified at 10 C.F.R. § 430.32(a). If EHP's Application for Exception were granted, EHP would receive exception relief from the energy efficiency standard applicable to a new frost-free chest freezer EHP proposes to introduce into the

499

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0066.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 March 9, 2000 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Taylor Oil Company Date of Filing: July 30, 1999 Case Number: VEE-0066 On July 30, 1999, Taylor Oil Company (Taylor) of Somerville, New Jersey filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its Application, Taylor requests that it be relieved of the requirement to file Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. I. Background The EIA-782B reporting requirement grew out of the shortages of crude oil and petroleum products during the 1970s. In 1979,

500

R:\DECISION\0061.VBA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2003 2003 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Petitioner: Bernard Cowan Date of Filing: July 18, 2002 Case Number: VBA-0061 On July 18, 2002, Argonne National Laboratory-West ("ANL" or "the contractor") filed an appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued by an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 CFR Part 708. Bernard Cowan, 28 DOE ¶ 87,023 (2002). The IAD found that the contractor retaliated against Bernard Cowan ("Cowan" or "the complainant"), an employee at ANL, for making disclosures protected under Part 708. The IAD ordered the contractor to reinstate Cowan, provide him with back pay, and reimburse him for the reasonable costs and expenses of prosecuting his