Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Office of Hearings and Appeals | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites

Hearings and Appeals Hearings and Appeals Search Search form Search Office of Hearings and Appeals Office of Hearings and Appeals Services Services Home Applications for Exceptions Conflict Prevention and Resolution Conflict Prevention and Resolution Home Contract Disputes Environmental Conflict Resolution Field Office Programs HQ Mediation Program Ombuds Program OCPR Forms Appeals Hearings Application for Refund Information Center Information Center Home Annual Reports Decision Summaries Filing Information Mission About Us Offices Office of Hearings and Appeals Office of Hearings and Appeals Leadership Poli A. Marmolejos Director Office of Hearings and Appeals Read Bio ‣ Fred L. Brown Deputy Director of Office of Hearings & Appeals Read Bio ‣ Janet N. Freimuth Chief of the Employee Protection and Exceptions Division

2

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 24, 2007, the Acting Director of the Office of August 24, 2007, the Acting Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals authorized me to render a decision on Burnette's complaint. August 30, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Jeffrey R. Burnette Date of Filing: August 23, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0071 Jeffrey R. Burnette (Burnette or the complainant), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under Section 708.17. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied. 1 I. Background This complainant's Part 708 history dates from 2001. A brief

3

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2007 3, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Fredrick Abbott Date of Filing: February 21, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0062 Fredrick Abbott (the complainant or Abbott), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, I have determined that the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained and the appeal denied. I. Background The complainant is an employee with Washington Savannah River Company (WSRC), which operates the DOE's Savannah River site located in Aiken, South Carolina. Pursuant to Part 708, on April 13, 2006, he filed a complaint of retaliation against WSRC with the DOE's Savannah River Operations Office. In his complaint,

4

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2007 3, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Delbert F. Bunch Date of Filing: May 7, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0068 Delbert F. Bunch (Bunch or the complainant), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was dated September 6, 2006. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied. I. Background The complainant was an employee with Bechtel SAIC Company LLP (BSC), the prime contractor to the DOE Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCWRM) Yucca Mountain Project. The DOE OCRWM has been tasked to develop and manage a safe system to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. In

5

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2007 0, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Charles Montano Date of Filing: April 27, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0067 Charles Montano (the complainant), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was dated January 30, 2007. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied. I. Background The complainant, an auditor, has been an employee of the DOE's Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in Los Alamos, New Mexico since 1978. Until June 2006, the University of California (UC) held the management and operations (M&O) contract to run LANL for the DOE. On June 1, 2006, Los Alamos National Security (LANS) LLC assumed

6

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 22, 2007 March 22, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Misti Wall Date of Filing: February 15, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0061 Misti Wall (the complainant or Wall), appeals the dismissal of her complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be reversed and the matter remanded for further processing to the Whistleblower Program Manager (Manager) at the National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA). I. Background The complainant was an employee with Sandia Corporation (Sandia), a DOE contractor that runs Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Pursuant to Part 708, she

7

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

According to SNL, the 30 minute estimation period is the According to SNL, the 30 minute estimation period is the standard practice for this work group. 2/ The complainant later made the correction as directed and returned to work. December 19, 2006 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Donald R. Rhodes Date of Filing: December 8, 2006 Case Number: TBU-0058 Donald R. Rhodes (Rhodes or the complainant) appeals the dismissal of his August 25, 2006 complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. He filed the complaint with the Whistleblower Program Manager (WP Manager) of the DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA/SC), located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. As explained below, the WP Manager's November 16, 2006

8

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 29, 2006 November 29, 2006 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: William Cor Date of Filing: April 21, 2006 Case Number: TBU-0045 William Cor (the complainant or the employee), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be reversed and the matter remanded for further processing to the Whistleblower Program Manager at the National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA). I. Background The complainant was an employee with ARES Corporation, a DOE contractor at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Pursuant to Part 708, he filed a complaint of retaliation

9

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Supplemental Order  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 1997 4, 1997 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Supplemental Order Name of Case:C. Lawrence Cornett Date of Filing:February 3, 1997 Case Number: VWX-0010 This Decision supplements an Initial Agency Decision, dated December 19, 1996, issued by the undersigned Hearing Officer of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy in a case involving a "whistleblower" complaint. The complaint was filed by C. Lawrence Cornett (Cornett) under the Department of Energy's Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. See C. Lawrence Cornett, 26 DOE ¶ 87,507 (1996) (Cornett). (1) In Cornett, I found that Maria Elena Torano Associates, Inc. (META), a DOE contractor, had violated the provisions of 10 C.F.R. § 708.5 by

10

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2006 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/13/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4455 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2006

11

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2003 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/10/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4452 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2003

12

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2008 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/15/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4457 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2008

13

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2009 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve claims related to uniformed service members' pay, allowances, travel, transportation, retired pay, and survivor benefits Tags {"military personnel","government claims",pay,"military benefits","uniformed services",overpayment} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V32 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4474 Public Access Level public

14

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1996 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V34 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4476 Public Access Level public

15

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1999 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V37 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4479 Public Access Level public

16

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1998 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V36 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4478 Public Access Level public

17

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10 10 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2010 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/17/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4459 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2010

18

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2006 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve claims related to uniformed service members' pay, allowances, travel, transportation, retired pay, and survivor benefits Tags {"military personnel","government claims",pay,"military benefits","uniformed services",overpayment} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/29/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4471 Public Access Level public

19

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Military Personnel Claim Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2010 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2010 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve claims related to uniformed service members' pay, allowances, travel, transportation, retired pay, and survivor benefits Tags {"military personnel","government claims",pay,"military benefits","uniformed services",overpayment} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V33 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4475

20

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Transportation and Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1997 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1997 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V35 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2002 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/09/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4451 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2002

22

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

a position more closely aligned with his skills and abilities; and (iii) raise his salary to the level it was prior to his "initial employment action." He also requested...

23

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Manager to Specialist 5, which he contends will have an adverse impact on his future salary increases. In the July 17, 2006 dismissal letter, the EC Manager of the DOEID...

24

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

He stated that he was rehired by UT-Batelle on May 15, 2006, although at a reduced salary and pay grade. On January 4, 2007, Searle filed a complaint of retaliation under Part...

25

Appeals | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Appeals Appeals Appeals FOIA and Whistleblower Appeal Information The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, together contain the general principles under which executive agencies, such as the Department of Energy, make information in their possession available to the public and at the same time protect the privacy interest of individuals about whom the agency has obtained information. Each of these statutes requires the agencies to promulgate regulations that specify how these principles will be implemented. The Department of Energy's FOIA and Privacy Act regulations, 10 C.F.R. Parts 1004 and 1008, respectively, provide that individuals may request information from the Department of Energy (and in some instances correct

26

CSP Policies & Procedures Process for Grade Appeals  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CSP Policies & Procedures Process for Grade Appeals Grade Appeals ­ Generally speaking, once grades

Leistikow, Bruce N.

27

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

06 06 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: S.R. Davis Date of Filing: May 19, 2004 Case Number: VBA-0083 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on April 21, 2004, involving a complaint filed by S.R. Davis (also referred to as the Complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In her Complaint, the Complainant claims that her former employer, Fluor Fernald, Inc. (the Contractor), retaliated against her for engaging in activity that is protected by Part 708. In the IAD, an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer determined that the Contractor met its burden of demonstrating, by clear and convincing evidence, that it would have taken the same action in the absence of the

28

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 9, 2007 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Clint Olson Date of Filing: November 18, 2005 Case Number: TBA-0027 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on October 27, 2005, involving a Complaint of Retaliation filed by Clint Olson (also referred to as the employee or the complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. Olson was an employee of BWXT Pantex (also referred to as BWXT, the firm, or the contractor), the Management and Operating Contractor at the DOE's Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas. In his Complaint, Mr. Olson claims that BWXT retaliated against him for making disclosures that are protected under Part 708. In the IAD, an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing

29

Hearings | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hearings Hearings Hearings Security Hearings The DOE has established procedures that govern the resolution of questions concerning the eligibility of individuals who are employed by or applicants for employment with DOE contractors, agents, and DOE access permittees; individuals who are DOE employees or applicants for DOE employment; and other persons designated by the Secretary of Energy for access to classified matter or special nuclear material. (This access authorization is commonly referred to as a security clearance.) These procedures are codified in Subpart A of 10 CFR Part 710. Subpart A provides an opportunity for hearing and administrative review in cases when it is determined that questions concerning an individual's eligibility for access authorization

30

DOE Solar Decathlon: Market Appeal  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Market Appeal Each U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon team builds its house for a target client of its choosing. The Market Appeal Jury, which is composed of professionals...

31

GRR/Section 9-FD-d - BLM Appeals Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

d - BLM Appeals Process d - BLM Appeals Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 9-FD-d - BLM Appeals Process 09FDDBLMAppealsProcess.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Bureau of Land Management United States Department of Interior Regulations & Policies 43 CFR 4.21: Hearings and Appeals - General Provisions 43 CFR 3200: Geothermal Resource Leasing Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 09FDDBLMAppealsProcess.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has an appeals process that allows

32

Office of Hearings and Appeals | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

For Employees DOE Workplace Employee Self Service OPM Gov. Operating Status DOE Phone Book Access to DOE Voicemail 202-586-7800 1-800-832-0890 Access to DOE Helpdesk...

33

DOE Solar Decathlon: Market Appeal Contest  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Market Appeal Contest (100 points) Each U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon 2013 team will build its house for a target client of its choosing. The Market Appeal Jury,...

34

Disposition Record Request: Oil Import Appeals Board | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Record Request: Oil Import Appeals Board Disposition Record Request: Oil Import Appeals Board OIAB Case Files. Records consist of company requests for relief from hardship imposed...

35

OHA Worker Appeal Cases Archive File  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This is a archive file of our Worker Appeal decisions, Please download this file to your local computer and use the build in adobe search feature. Individual cases are listed in the bookmark...

36

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Janet L. Westbrook  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2002 9, 2002 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Janet L. Westbrook Date of Filing: January 17, 2002 Case Number: VBA-0059 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on December 21, 2001, involving a Complaint filed by Janet L. Westbrook (Westbrook or the Complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In her Complaint, Westbrook claims that her former employer, UT-Battelle, LLC (Battelle or the Company), the DOE contractor that manages the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (the Laboratory), terminated her as part of a reduction in force (RIF) as a retaliation for making disclosures that are protected under Part 708. In the IAD, however, the Hearing Officer determined that Battelle had shown that it would have terminated the

37

Toward automation in hearing aid design  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In the manufacturing of customized medical prostheses, such as in-the-ear hearing aids, the design process often is dictated by a source template representing the anatomy of a patient and a set of work instructions representing the description of surface ... Keywords: Application, Automation, CAD, CAM, Expert systems, Feature recognition, Hearing aid design, Medical prostheses manufacturing, Modeling, Rule-based systems, Shape transformation

Konrad Sickel; Sajjad Baloch; Rupen Melkisetoglu; Vojtech Bubnik; Sergei Azernikov; Tong Fang

2011-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

38

Hearing Loss  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Earphones Potentially as Dangerous as Noise from Jet Engines, Earphones Potentially as Dangerous as Noise from Jet Engines, Researchers Find Aug. 29, 2012 - Turning the volume up too high on your headphones can damage the coating of nerve cells, leading to temporary deafness, scientists from the University of Leicester have shown for the first time. Earphones or headphones on personal music players can reach noise levels similar to those of jet engines, the researchers said. Noises louder than 110 decibels are known to cause hearing problems such as temporary deafness and tinnitus (ringing in the ears), but the University of Leicester study is the first time the underlying cell damage has been observed. The study has been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. University of Leicester researcher Dr Martine Hamann of the Department of Cell Physiology and Pharmacology,

39

EPA Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) Decisions Web Page | Data...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EPA Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) Decisions Web Page Law DataTools Law You are here Data.gov Communities Law Data EPA Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) Decisions Web...

40

File:09FDDBLMProtestAndAppealsProcess (2).pdf | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

FDDBLMProtestAndAppealsProcess (2).pdf FDDBLMProtestAndAppealsProcess (2).pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage File:09FDDBLMProtestAndAppealsProcess (2).pdf Size of this preview: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 × 600 pixels. Full resolution ‎(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 56 KB, MIME type: application/pdf) File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 17:34, 25 October 2012 Thumbnail for version as of 17:34, 25 October 2012 1,275 × 1,650 (56 KB) Dklein2012 (Talk | contribs) You cannot overwrite this file. Edit this file using an external application (See the setup instructions for more information) File usage There are no pages that link to this file. Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=File:09FDDBLMProtestAndAppealsProcess_(2).pdf&oldid=530932"

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

DOE Solar Decathlon: News Blog » Market Appeal  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

'Market Appeal' 'Market Appeal' South China University Takes the Lead at Solar Decathlon China Friday, August 9, 2013 Richard King The results of three contests were announced at Solar Decathlon China this morning. Teams gathered in the auditorium of the Sun Palace, and jury members announced the first, second, and third place for Engineering, Communications, and Market Appeal. The results are: Engineering University of Wollongong - Australia South China University of Technology and Huazhong University of Science and Technology - China Chalmers University of Technology - Sweden Communications Chalmers University of Technology - Sweden University of Wollongong - Australia South China University of Technology and Huazhong University of Science and Technology - China Market Appeal

42

Hearing protection for miners  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A NIOSH analysis showed that at age 50 approximately 90% of coal miners have a hearing impairment, yet noise included hearing loss is 100% preventable. The article discusses requirements of the MSHA regulations, 30 CFR Part 62 - occupational noise exposure (2000) and a 2008-MSHA document describing technologically achievable and promising controls for several types of mining machinery. Hearing protection is still required for exposure to greater than 90 dBA. These are now commercially available ways to determine how much attenuation an individual gets from a given hearing protector, known as 'fit testing'. 3 refs., 1 fig., 1 tab., 1 photo.

Schulz, T. [Sperian Hearing Protection (United States)

2008-10-15T23:59:59.000Z

43

Application for Refund | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Application for Refund Application for Refund Application for Refund During the period 1973 through 1981, the Federal government imposed price and allocation controls of crude oil and refined petroleum products, such as gasoline and heating oil. During that period and for many years afterwards, the DOE had an enforcement program. When a firm was found to have overcharged, the DOE generally required the firm to make refunds to its customers. However, because of the price controls in place at the time and the manner in which the petroleum industry operates, it was impossible for the DOE to determine in many cases who was injured by the overcharges. In those cases involving overcharges related to the price of refined petroleum products, the Office of Hearings and Appeals instituted claims

44

Noise and Hearing Conservation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hearing Conservation Hearing Conservation Mary L. Doyle NOISE & HEARING CONSERVATION Mary L. Doyle, MPH, RN, COHN-S/CM DOE Headquarters January 16, 2002 1.0.1.~ CAUSES OF HEARING LOSS * Congenital * Environmental Exposures * Hereditary * Illness *Injury * Noise * Occupational * Non-Occupational * Sociacusis S.O.S. eon.ua.nt. OTOTOXIC DRUGS Can Affect Cochlea or Vestibular System * Aminoglycoside Antibiotics * Diuretics * Cancer Chemotherapy * Aspirin * Quinines * Usually Permanent * Consider Benefit-Risk Ratio S.O.S. eon.ua.nts HEARING * Modification of Acoustic Wave by Outer Ear * Conversion of Modified Acoustic Wave to Vibration of Eardrum * Middle Ear * Inner Ear * Transformation of Mechanical Movement to Nerve Impulses S.O.S. CoMubRis OTOTOXIC INDUSTRIAL

45

Dog Teeth and Hearing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dog Teeth and Hearing Dog Teeth and Hearing Name: Chad Status: other Grade: 9-12 Location: Outside U.S. Country: Canada Date: Spring 2011 Question: Can a bad tooth problem, infection (we've had several teeth pulled) cause a problem with deafness in a dog ? We have a snoodle 14 years old, but still in other wise good health. Replies: Hi Chad, Sorry to hear about Snoodle's hearing and dental problems. Deafness in an older dog is not uncommon and it would not likely be due to any tooth related problems. A severe tooth infection that extends or penetrates through the bone into the ear canal would be very rare and you would see very obvious symptoms in the ear. If your vet has examined Snoodle and there were no obvious problems related to the ear canal, then I would attribute the hearing loss to an age related change. I hope this helps.

46

OHA Case Tracking System PIA,Office of Hearings and Appeals ...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PIA - Bonneville Power Adminstration Ethics Helpline iManage Strategic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System (STRIPES) PIA, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management...

47

PSH-12-0047 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0047 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that an individual should be granted DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred an applicant for a security clearance to administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including the opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual was a user of alcohol habitually to excess, as well as the individual's past arrests. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer determined that the individual mitigated the

48

PSH-13-0062 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0062 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 16, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that the DOE should not restore an individual's suspended DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred the individual, an applicant for DOE access authorization, to administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including the individual's two past arrests for Driving While Intoxicated as well as his diagnosis of alcohol dependence by a DOE consultant-psychologist. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. Following the hearing, the Hearing Officer determined that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to mitigate the

49

PSH-12-0110 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0110 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 16, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that an individual should be granted DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred an applicant for a security clearance to administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including the opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual was a user of alcohol habitually to excess. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer determined that

50

Interior Board of Land Appeals | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Interior Board of Land Appeals Interior Board of Land Appeals Jump to: navigation, search Name Interior Board of Land Appeals Address 801 N. Quincy Street, Suite 300 Place Arlington, Virginia Zip 22203 Phone number 703-235-9902 Website http://www.oha.doi.gov/about_i Coordinates 38.880369°, -77.107316° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.880369,"lon":-77.107316,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

51

GRR/Elements/18-CA-b.16 - Does the Developer or Public Appeal...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Public Appeal the Decision < GRR | Elements Jump to: navigation, search Edit 18-CA-b.16 to 18-CA-b.19 - Does the Developer or Public Appeal the Decision If the DTSC denies the...

52

State of California BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CIGARETTE AND TOBACCO PRODUCTS LICENSING ACT REGULATIONS Regulation 4609. RIGHT TO APPEAL.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

(a) Every licensee or unlicensed person has the right to appeal any alleged violation of the Act, and may appeal a Warning

unknown authors

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Published Decisions - 2011 |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Published Decisions - 2011 Dataset Summary Description post-award contract disputes between government contractors and the Department of Defense, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and other entities with whom the ASBCA has entered into agreements to provide services. Tags {"contract dispute","defense contractor; contract appeal"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 12/01/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email Catherine.Stanton@ASBCA.MIL Unique Identifier DOD-5473 Public Access Level public

54

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Published Decisions - 2005 |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

05 05 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Published Decisions - 2005 Dataset Summary Description post-award contract disputes between government contractors and the Department of Defense, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and other entities with whom the ASBCA has entered into agreements to provide services. Tags {"contract dispute","defense contractor; contract appeal"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/07/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email Catherine.Stanton@ASBCA.MIL Unique Identifier DOD-4439

55

DUF6 Draft EIS Public Hearing Transcripts  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Depleted UF6 Draft EIS Public Hearing Transcripts Transcripts from the DUF6 Conversion Draft EIS Public Hearings The following transcripts are from the DUF6 Conversion...

56

A CMOS Hearing Aid Device  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper a CMOS Hearing Aid Device is described. The system is composed of a low-distortion low-noise preamplifier, an automatic gain control (AGC), a fully programmable switched-capacitor filter (equalizer), and a control system. The device has ... Keywords: AGCs, CMOS amplifiers and filters, analog integrated circuits, hearing aid device

Jos Silva-Martnez; Sergio Sols-Bustos; Jorge Salcedo-Suer; Rogelio Rojas-Hernndez; Martin Schellenberg

1999-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

57

Security Hearing FAQs | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Hearings » Security Hearing FAQs Services » Hearings » Security Hearing FAQs Security Hearing FAQs (1) What is the purpose of the hearing? The purpose of the hearing is to provide you with an opportunity to respond to the DOE's questions concerning your eligibility to hold a security clearance ("security concerns"), as outlined in the Statement of Charges attached to the Notification Letter. During the hearing, you will be able to present evidence to explain, refute or mitigate the derogatory information cited in the Statement of Charges. After the hearing, the Hearing Officer will review the testimonial and documentary evidence in the record, and issue a Decision which contains findings of fact and a determination whether or not to grant or restore your security clearance.

58

Department of Energy Fiscal Years 1980-81 authorization (Civilian Applications). Hearing before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, Ninety-Sixth Congress, First Session on S. 688  

SciTech Connect

Five representatives of DOE and Senator Henry Jackson testified at the April 25, 1979 hearing on the bill (S. 688) to authorize 1980-81 appropriations for civilian projects. Background material and the responses to questions submitted prior to the hearing are included with the testimony. The appropriations under consideration were for management and support, outreach and international activities, policy analysis, systems studies, and departmental energy management. (DCK)

1979-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

59

Rare is interesting: connecting spatio-temporal behavior patterns with subjective image appeal  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We analyze behavior patterns and photographic habits of the Nokia Mobile Data Challenge (NMDC) participants using GPS and time-stamp data. We show that these patterns and habits can be used to estimate image appeal ratings of geotagged Flickr images. ... Keywords: geo-tagging, image appeal rating, spatio-temporal behavior patterns, time- and location-based events

Gkhan Yildirim, Sabine Ssstrunk

2013-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

60

Hearing Conservation Program 1.0 Reference  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Hearing Conservation Program 1.0 Reference California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Article 105, Fullerton to establish and maintain effective noise control and hearing conservation programs designed by University policy and State law. 4.0 Scope The Hearing Conservation Program affects all employees exposed

de Lijser, Peter

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Reliability of underwater hearing thresholds in pinnipeds  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Reliability of underwater hearing thresholds in pinnipeds Brandon L. Southall Long Marine@ucsc.edu Abstract: Repeated measures of low-frequency underwater hearing sensi- tivity in individuals of three and certain testing parameters (e.g., equipment and research personnel), measured underwater hearing

Reichmuth, Colleen

62

Accommodations for Hearing Disabilities | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hearing Disabilities Hearing Disabilities Accommodations for Hearing Disabilities Although the general term "hearing impaired" is being used to include both deaf and hard of hearing individuals, the needs of these two groups may vary greatly. In general, people who are deaf depend more upon visual skills for communication and information in their environment while hard of hearing people enhance their usable hearing while relying on auditory input more than visual input. This general difference drives many of the concerns and needs mentioned in this section. It is key that the individual participate in the process of identifying the accommodation solution to ensure it is suitable for the individual and their needs. Visual Redundancy on Computers - Ensure that important information

63

PSH-11-0024 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

24 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 24 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0024 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an applicant for a DOE security clearance. In March 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address his alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in August 2011 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). PSH-11-0024.pdf More Documents & Publications TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security

64

EIS-0226: Notice of Changes to Public Hearings | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Changes to Public Hearings EIS-0226: Notice of Changes to Public Hearings Decommissioning andor Long-Term Stewardship at the West Valley Demonstration Project and Western New York...

65

Audiometry (hearing test) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audiometry (hearing test) Audiometry (hearing test) Audiometry (hearing test) The audiogram is an evaluation of how well an individual can hear. Sounds are presented to the individual through earphones during the test. These sounds are presented at different levels of frequency and intensity. The human ear responds to the frequency or pitch of a sound and the intensity or loudness of the sound. The frequency of the sound is measured in Hertz (Hz), and the loudness of the sound is measured in decibels (dB). During the procedure, the responses of the individual are recorded on a graph. An individual has no impairment in hearing if he or she detects the sound that is presented through the earphones in the range of 0 to 25 decibels. The audiogram indicates how much louder (in decibels) the pure tone frequency

66

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Court of Appeals Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 10-1074 September Term, 2010 FILED ON: DECEMBER 13, 2010 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS Consolidated with 10-1076 Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of Energy Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; BROWN, Circuit Judge; and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. J U D G M E N T This appeal was considered on the record and the briefs submitted by the parties. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. CIR. R. 34(j). The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. CIR. R.36(d). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review is dismissed.

67

TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is an applicant for a DOE access authorization in connection with his employment with a DOE contractor. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in June 2010, and participated in an October 2010 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 7, 8. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychologist ("the DOE psychologist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist evaluated the Individual in February 2011 and issued a report. DOE Ex. 10. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the Individual in a June 2011 Notification Letter

68

PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual, a 48-year-old employee of a DOE contractor, is an applicant for DOE access authorization. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in May 2011, and participated in an August 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 8, 9. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE psychiatrist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist evaluated the Individual in September 2011 and issued a report. DOE Exs. 6, 7. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the

69

PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 14 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual, a 48-year-old employee of a DOE contractor, is an applicant for DOE access authorization. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in May 2011, and participated in an August 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 8, 9. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE psychiatrist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist evaluated the Individual in September 2011 and issued a report. DOE Exs. 6, 7. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the

70

TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is an applicant for a DOE access authorization in connection with his employment with a DOE contractor. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in June 2010, and participated in an October 2010 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 7, 8. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychologist ("the DOE psychologist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist evaluated the Individual in February 2011 and issued a report. DOE Ex. 10. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the Individual in a June 2011 Notification Letter

71

TGDC Public Data Gathering Hearings Sept 20-22, 2004  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

TECHNICAL GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (TGDC). TGDC Public Data Gathering Hearings Sept 20-22, 2004. ...

2012-11-07T23:59:59.000Z

72

Fairness in the Air: California's Air Pollution Hearing Boards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

oral depositions, requests for admission of facts, and document production requests. Be- cause hearing board

Manaster, Kenneth A.

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

Evaluation of Incompatibility Between Electronic Ballasts and a Hearing Aid  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This power quality (PQ) case study evaluates the incompatibility between electronic ballasts and a hearing aid.

2003-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

74

PSH-12-0015 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0015 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an applicant for a DOE security clearance. In July 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address his alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual=s medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in October 2011 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). According to the DOE psychiatrist, the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist further

75

PSH-12-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and an applicant for an access authorization. To address concerns related to the individual's past use of alcohol and marijuana, other prior criminal conduct, and certain discrepancies in the record regarding the individual's conduct, a Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on August 29, 2011. Exhibit 10. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth

76

TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an applicant for a DOE security clearance. In March 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address her alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in April 2011 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). According to the DOE psychiatrist, the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. tso1102.pdf More Documents & Publications

77

PSH-12-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and is an applicant for DOE access authorization. In August 2010, the individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) and was subject to an Office of Personnel Management (OPM) background investigation. He provided information to the Local Security Office (LSO) during a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) conducted in March 2011 that was inconsistent with answers he provided on his QNSP and during his OPM investigation, revealing that he had been hospitalized in January 2010 for alcohol abuse, treatment of prescription drug addiction and depression. Because the LSO could not resolve these discrepancies and the concerns

78

PSH-11-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing This case involves an Individual with a pattern of failing to meet his financial obligations dating back to 1993. A Local Security Office (LSO) has been monitoring the Individual's financial situation since his original application for a security clearance in 2000. In 2006, the LSO received information indicating that the Individual had a large number of delinquent debts. The LSO subsequently conducted a series of five Personal Security Interviews (PSI) of the Individual, the most recent on September 29, 2011. Unable to resolve the security concerns raised by the Individual's continuing financial issues, and by the sometimes inconsistent and contradictory information provided by the Individual, the

79

PSH-11-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and an applicant for an access authorization. On a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP), the individual disclosed that he had been charged with sexual penetration of a minor in 2003 and possession of marijuana in 1997. Exhibit 9. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on April 6, 2011. Exhibit 10. After the PSI, the LSO referred the individual to a local psychiatrist (hereinafter referred to as "the DOE psychiatrist") for an agency-sponsored evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist prepared a written report, setting forth the results of that evaluation, and sent it to the

80

Eighth National Green Power Marketing Conference: Increasing Access, Appeal, and Awareness  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Eighth National Green Power Marketing Conference -- Increasing Access, Appeal, and Awareness -- reviewed the status of the green power marketing industry and explored innovative ways of designing and marketing green power products. The conference, held in Chicago, Illinois, November 35, 2003, was organized by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), EPRI, and Center for Resource Solutions. The conference was cosponsored by EPRI; the Office of Power Techn...

2004-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

An exploration of the relationship between use of parks and access, park appeal, and communication effectiveness  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Understanding what variables influence park use would assist park providers and policy makers in acquiring, designing, managing, and funding initiatives which encourage or support park use. Previous studies indicate that access to parks (measured by both objective and perceived distances), park appeal in terms of being well-maintained, and effective communication between constituents and park suppliers, relate positively to park use. This study explores the relationships between access, appeal, and communication and park use. Access is operationalized as four objective distances from household to nearest park using both Euclidian and Network measures, and by subjective self-reported measures of ability to access parks on foot or by bicycle. Appeal is concerned with the influence of parks perceived level of maintenance and availability of amenities on the probability of park use. Effective communication is operationalized by three variables: perceptions of being well-informed, being included in the planning process, and being able to give feedback to park leaders. These variables and selected demographic data were extracted from an existing data set: the City of College Station Needs Assessment. Findings indicated that a) respondents with access to parks are more likely to use parks, b) level of maintenance and available amenities influenced use, and c) respondents who are well-informed are more likely to use parks.

Walker, Jamie Rae

2008-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

82

NIST Researchers Hear Puzzling New Physics from Graphene ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Researchers Hear Puzzling New Physics from Graphene Quartet's Quantum Harmonies. For Immediate Release: September 8, 2010. ...

2010-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

83

INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT COMMITTEE REVISED HEARING AGENDA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT COMMITTEE REVISED HEARING AGENDA DAY 1 Committee's Draft 2007 Integrated Energy Policy Report Monday, October 15, 2007 9:00 a.m. Hearing Room A ­ California Energy. General Public Comments #12;INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT COMMITTEE REVISED HEARING AGENDA DAY 2

84

Seller of spent batteries incurs CERCLA liability under appeals court reversal  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Reversing a lower court ruling, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has decided that an auto parts company that sold spent lead-acid batteries to a lead reclaimer can be held liable under CERCLA for contamination caused by battery remnants (Cattelus Development Corporation v. United States et al., Dockett Number: 93-16530). The lower court had ruled that the auto parts company was not liable because (1) the batteries still had a {open_quotes}productive use{close_quotes} when they were sold, and (2) the company had no involvement in the final disposition of the battery casings.

NONE

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

85

VEE-0040- In the Matter of Western Star Propane, Inc.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On February 18, 1997, Western Star Propane, Inc. (Western) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application,...

86

VEE-0032- In the Matter of Thomas Oil Company  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On September 13, 1996, Thomas Oil Company (Thomas Oil) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Thomas...

87

PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 - Personnel Security Hearing 6 - Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing On October 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted . A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's falsification and financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that the requisite element of "deliberateness" was met under Criterion F. She further found that

88

Hearing Nano-Structures: A Case Study in Timbral Sonification  

SciTech Connect

We explore the sonification of x-ray scattering data, which are two-dimensional arrays of intensity whose meaning is obscure and non-intuitive. Direct mapping of the experimental data into sound is found to produce timbral sonifications that, while sacrificing conventional aesthetic appeal, provide a rich auditory landscape for exploration. We discuss the optimization of sonification variables, and speculate on potential real-world applications. We have presented a case study of sonifying x-ray scattering data. Direct mapping of the two-dimensional intensity values of a scattering dataset into the two-dimensional matrix of a sonogram is a natural and information-preserving operation that creates rich sounds. Our work supports the notion that many problems in understanding rather abstract scientific datasets can be ameliorated by adding the auditory modality of sonification. We further emphasize that sonification need not be limited to time-series data: any data matrix is amenable. Timbral sonification is less obviously aesthetic, than tonal sonification, which generate melody, harmony, or rhythm. However these musical sonifications necessarily sacrifice information content for beauty. Timbral sonification is useful because the entire dataset is represented. Non-musicians can understand the data through the overall color of the sound; audio experts can extract more detailed insight by studying all the features of the sound.

Schedel, M.; Yager, K.

2012-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

89

PSH-12-0135 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0135 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he...

90

PSH-12-0135 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

35 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0135 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which...

91

PSH-13-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 9, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the...

92

PSH-12-0060 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0060 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 14, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which...

93

September 2, 1998, DNFSB announcing Public Hearing for Recommendation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Hearing Room, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20004. STATUS: Open. MA'ITERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board will convene...

94

Microsoft Word - Draft CMRR Hearing announcement.docx  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

19 Rio Grande SUN on May 12 and 19 Public Hearings Scheduled for the Chemistry & Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Nuclear Facility Draft Supplemental Environmental...

95

December 5, 2008, Board Public Hearing and Meeting regarding...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal projects, the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) project and the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement (CMRR) project . This fourth public hearing and meeting will...

96

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 6   Typical applications of duplex stainless steels...salt evaporation equipment, desalination plants, geothermal

97

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 3   Wear-, erosion-, and corrosion-resistance applications of CVD...against neutron radiation

98

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 8   Major markets for ABS products...Market category Applications ABS grades Major appliances Refrigerator door and food liners; crisper pans;

99

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 5   Selected applications for wrought aluminum alloys...vehicles, trucks and trailers 3105 Residential siding, mobile homes, rain-carrying goods,

100

Internet use and personal empowerment of hearing-impaired adolescents  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Internet has become an ordinary and widely accepted alternative social environment-known as cyberspace-in which many people take part in numerous activities. For the hearing-impaired, cyberspace provides extra benefits for two basic reasons: means ... Keywords: Adolescents, Empowerment, Hearing-impaired, Internet, Well-being

Azy Barak; Yael Sadovsky

2008-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

EIS-0372: Notice of Public Hearings | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Hearings Public Hearings EIS-0372: Notice of Public Hearings Proposed Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect The Department of Energy (DOE) announces two public hearings on the ''Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect'' (DOE/EIS-0372). Notice of Public Hearings for the Proposed Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Inteconnect (DOE/EIS-0372) (September 2005 - 70 FR 53786) More Documents & Publications EIS-0372: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and to Conduct Public Scoping Meetings and Notice of Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement PP-89-1 Bangor Hydro-Electric Company EIS-0372: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings

102

VEE-0045- In the Matter of Patriot Petroleum, Inc.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On July 14, 1997, Patriot Petroleum, Inc. (Patriot) of Newburyport, Massachusetts, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its...

103

TEE-0073- In the Matter of Cole Distributing, Inc.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On December 13, 2010, Cole Distributing, Inc. (Cole) filed an Application for Exception withthe Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firmrequests that it be...

104

VEE-0020 - In the Matter of Mercury Fuel Service, Inc.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On April 9, 1996, Mercury Fuel Service, Inc. (Mercury) of Waterbury, Connecticut, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE)....

105

TEE-0060- In the Matter of 7 Oil Co., Inc.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On June 11, 2009, 7 Oil Co., Inc. (7 Oil) filed an Application for Exception with the Office ofHearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be...

106

LEE-0161- In the Matter of Coker Oil, Inc.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On September 16, 1994, Coker Oil, Inc. (Coker) of Lake City, South Carolina, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its...

107

TEE-0061- In the Matter of Kirby Oil Company, Inc.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On June 16, 2009, Kirby Oil Company, Inc. (Kirby Oil) filed an Application for Exception withthe Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firmrequests that it...

108

TEE-0071- In the Matter of Monroe Oil Company  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On May 26, 2010, Monroe Oil Company (Monroe) filed an Application for Exception with theOffice of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests thatit be...

109

VEE-0082- In the Matter of Fleischli Oil Company  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On February 26, 2002, Fleischli Oil Company (Fleischli) filed an Application for Exception withthe Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). Fleischlirequests that...

110

TEE-0072- In the Matter of B&B Marine, Inc.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On October 15, 2010, B&B Marine, Inc. (B&B) filed an Application for Exception with theOffice of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requeststhat it be...

111

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 2   Applications for titanium and titanium alloys...for FGD units, nuclear waste disposal Geothermal energy Heat exchangers, evaporators, condensers, tubes Marine engineering Shipbuilding Heat exchangers, condensers, piping

112

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 2   Examples of applications and parts made with vacuum infusion...small aircraft Industrial Fan blades, part for fish counting unit, toilet bowl, oil

113

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 6 Selected applications for aluminum casting alloys...gears; jet engine compressor cases 356.0 Sand: flywheel castings; automotive transmission cases; oil pans; pump bodies. Permanent: machine tool parts;

114

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 1   Application of sintered stainless steels...316L Photographic equipment 316L Cam cleats 304L Dishwasher components 304L Can opener gears 410L...

115

Applications:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Applications: Applications: ● Telecommunications: cell / smartphone; multi-party secure phone calls; videoconferencing; Voice over IP (VoIP) ● Banking and financial transactions: ATM, debit / credit card and e-Commerce ● e-Business; e-gaming; e-books; e-music; e-movies; e-gambling ● Wireless internet ● Electronic voting ● Facility and vehicle access ● Information exchange for government/defense

116

Broadening the Appeal of Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: Capturing Both Carbon Mitigation and Development Benefits of Clean Energy Technologies: Preprint  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Broadening the Appeal of Broadening the Appeal of Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: Capturing Both Carbon Mitigation and Development Benefits of Clean Energy Technologies Preprint Shannon Cowlin, Jaquelin Cochran, Sadie Cox, and Carolyn Davidson National Renewable Energy Laboratory Wytze van der Gaast JI Network Presented at the 2012 World Renewable Energy Forum Denver, Colorado May 13-17, 2012 Conference Paper NREL/CP-6A20-54487 August 2012 NOTICE The submitted manuscript has been offered by an employee of the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC (Alliance), a contractor of the US Government under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Accordingly, the US Government and Alliance retain a nonexclusive royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for US Government purposes.

117

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 3   Major application areas of porous P/M materials...refining Semiconductor Particle removal process gas Bulk gas delivery systems Purifier media retainers Analysis instruments Gas/liquid chromatography Gas sampling Sensor protection Chemical processing Catalyst recovery Process gases and liquids Fluid-bed reactor products Mineral processing Coal,...

118

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 3   Some applications of investment casting...Electrical equipment Electronics, radar Guns and small armaments Hand tools Jewelry Machine tools Materials handling equipment Metal working equipment Oil well drilling and auxiliary equipment Optical equipment Packaging equipment Pneumatic and hydraulic systems Prosthetic appliances Pumps Sports gear...

119

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 1   Commercial applications of refractory metals and alloys by industry...Rhenium, W-Re Process industries Heating and cooling coils Tantalum, Ta-Nb Shell and tube heat exchangers Tantalum Condensers Tantalum Tantalum-clad steel vessels Tantalum Distillation towers Tantalum Valves for hot sulfuric acid service Molybdenum, tantalum, Ta-Nb Expansion joints (bellows) Tantalum...

120

Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 9   Applications of various polymers...bins 767 aircraft acoustical tile 767 and other Boeing aircraft brackets Airbus A320 bulk cargo floor sandwich structural panels Airbus A330-340 lower wing fairings A3XX main stair case (developmental) Beluga heavy-duty entrance floor panels Dornier 328 landing flap ribs Dornier 328 ice protection...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing September 14, 2011 - 12:04am Addthis Dan Leistikow Dan Leistikow Former Director, Office of Public Affairs This morning, the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations is holding a hearing to discuss Solyndra Solar, the California-based solar manufacturer that declared bankruptcy last week. Jonathan Silver, Executive Director of the Department's Loan Programs Office, will be testifying. We've posted Jonathan's written testimony online. The testimony is very thorough and provides a good explanation of the loan process and the extensive reviews and analysis conducted by the Department between 2006 and 2009. He also explains the remarkable changes in the solar market since

122

PSH-13-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 9, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. A DOE Psychiatrist had found that the individual suffered from alcohol abuse. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual mitigated these security concerns at the hearing by presenting evidence that he had more than fully complied with the DOE Psychiatrist's treatment recommendations and the treatment has been effective. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-13-0052.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-13-0083 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

123

PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of four arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. OHA Case No. PSH-12-0068 Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0068.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0129 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0131 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing

124

PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of four arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. OHA Case No. PSH-12-0068 Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0068.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0129 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0035 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

125

Draft Greater Than Class C EIS Public Hearings to Come to Pasco, WA and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The United States Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM), is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for disposal of Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level Radioactive Waste (GTCC LLRW). The EIS evaluates potential alternatives involving various disposal methods for application at six federally owned sites and generic commercial sites. (See Overview Below). The United States Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM), is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for disposal of Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level Radioactive Waste (GTCC LLRW). The EIS evaluates potential alternatives involving various disposal methods for application at six federally owned sites and generic commercial sites. (See Overview Below). Upcoming Public Hearings DOE will hold hearings in the following locations on the following dates and times. Las Vegas, NV Desert Research Institute - Frank Rodgers Building 755 East Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, NV 89119 May 9, 2011, 5:30 p.m.�9:30 p.m. Idaho Falls, ID Shilo Inn Suites Hotel 780 Lindsay Boulevard, Idaho Falls, ID 83402 May 11, 2011, 5:30 p.m.�9:30 p.m.

126

PSH-12-0033 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0033 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 27, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of nine arrests, seven of which were alcohol-related. In addition, the Individual had provided inaccurate and incomplete information to security officials during his background investigation. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual's credibility was suspect and therefore concluded that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0033.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-13-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

127

PSH-12-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing In April 2011, the individual began his employment with a DOE contractor...

128

PSH-12-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by the Department of Energy (DOE). Based upon...

129

PSH-13-0053- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On July 15, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual should not have an access authorization granted to him. In reaching this determination, the Hearing...

130

GRR/Elements/18-CA-c.14 - Allow Public Comment and Hold Hearing...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

and Hold Hearing DTSC allows for a 45 day public comment period on the Draft Hazardous Waste Facility Permit and holds a public hearing. Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

131

PSH-12-0124 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On January 14, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individuals access authorization should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer...

132

PSH-13-0015 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On May 20, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individuals security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not...

133

Fossil Energy FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing Fossil Energy FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing March 14, 2013 - 1:36pm Addthis Statement of Christopher Smith, Acting Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy before the House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development. Mr. Chairman, Madam Ranking Member, and Members of the Committee, it is my pleasure to appear before you today to discuss the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy's (FE) programs. Our fossil fuel resources are essential to the Nation's security and economic prosperity. The Office of Fossil Energy's primary mission is to ensure that the U.S. can continue to utilize those traditional fuel sources for clean, affordable, reliable energy. Technology development is critical to this mission. FE's Research and Development (FER&D) program

134

Notice of proposed rulemaking and public hearing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of proposed rulemaking and public hearing Notice of proposed rulemaking and public hearing Notice of proposed rulemaking and public hearing The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) proposes to amend its existing regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The majority of the changes are proposed for the categorical exclusions provisions contained in its NEPA Implementing Procedures, with a small number of related changes proposed for other provisions. These proposed changes are intended to better align the Department's regulations, particularly its categorical exclusions, with DOE's current activities and recent experiences, and to update the provisions with respect to current technologies and regulatory requirements. DOE proposes to establish 20 new categorical

135

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Industrial Hygiene: Programs: Hearing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hearing Conservation Noise sources at the Berkeley Lab are associated with, but not limited to, the Facilities and Engineering shops, mechanical rooms throughout the site, construction projects, and emergency generators. Engineering controls, such as enclosing noise sources (i.e., pumps, generators) and acoustical material (i.e., mechanical room walls and ceilings) are implemented when feasible. EH&S Industrial Hygienists evaluate high noise areas with sound level meters and noise dosimeters to determine if employees need to be enrolled in the Lab's Hearing Conservation Program. Employees enrolled in the Program receive a baseline audiogram and training and annually thereafter. Employees exposed to noise sources in excess of 85 decibels will be enrolled in the Program. Hearing protection must be made available

136

Speech?perception aids for hearing?impaired people: Current status and needed research  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Both the overall aging of the population and its exposure to higher noise levels have increased the tendency to hearing loss and the importance of improved hearing aids for speech perception. This article reviews improvements in conventional electroacoustic hearing aids as well as recently developed alternative classes of speech?perception aids

Working Group on Communication Aids for the Hearing?Impaired

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

Collaborative, Multimedia Solutions for Improving Educational Access for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Collaborative, Multimedia Solutions for Improving Educational Access for Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Multimedia Solutions for Improving Educational Access for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students Anna C. Cavender great potential to better include deaf and hard of hearing students in mainstream academic settings

Cavender, Anna C.

138

Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study Funded by the National Institute on Aging  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study (EHLS) Funded by the National Institute on Aging #12;EHLS is there continuing deterioration · Why does hearing worsen with aging · Does the middle ear stiffen with aging · How;Why do hearing impairments develop? Clues from Beaver Dam · Older age · Men more than women

Sheridan, Jennifer

139

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the House Appropriations Committee,  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

House Appropriations Committee, House Appropriations Committee, Energy and Water Development Subcommittee | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the ... Congressional Testimony FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the House Appropriations Committee,

140

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed Services Committee,  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

House Armed Services Committee, House Armed Services Committee, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed ... Congressional Testimony FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed Services Committee,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed Services Committee,  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

House Armed Services Committee, House Armed Services Committee, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed ... Congressional Testimony FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony House Armed Services Committee,

142

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the House Appropriations Committee,  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

House Appropriations Committee, House Appropriations Committee, Energy and Water Development Subcommittee | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the ... Congressional Testimony FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony before the House Appropriations Committee,

143

Fred L. Brown | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fred L. Brown Fred L. Brown About Us Fred L. Brown - Deputy Director of Office of Hearings & Appeals Fred L. Brown Fred Brown is the Deputy Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). OHA is the quasi-judicial arm of DOE that conducts hearings and issues initial Departmental decisions with respect to any adjudicative proceedings which the Secretary may delegate. OHA's jurisdiction includes: deciding Freedom of Information and Privacy Act appeals; conducting administrative hearings and issuing Departmental decisions regarding personnel security clearance eligibility; conducting contractor employee "whistleblower" hearings and investigations; deciding applications for exception from DOE rules and regulations; and performing mediation services for the agency. Mr. Brown

144

O'Leary outlines policy views at confirmation hearing  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In her confirmation hearing, Secretary O'Leary outlined her views on various controversial issues. Among these were management of Yucca Mountain and the search for a nuclear waste repository, research on alternative fuels, encouragement of the use of renewable energy sources, and her views on intergrated resource planning.

Simpson, J.

1993-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

145

Lefties Get It Right When Hearing Tool Sounds  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Our ability to manipulate and understand the use of a wide range of tools is a feature that sets humans apart from other animals. In right-handers, we previously reported that hearing hand-manipulated tool sounds preferentially activates a left hemisphere ...

James W. Lewis; Raymond E. Phinney; Julie A. Brefczynski-Lewis; Edgar A. DeYoe

2006-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

08 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 08 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 6, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his alcohol use. Specifically, the Hearing Officer concluded that the individual, who had been diagnosed by a DOE psychiatrist with Alcohol Abuse, achieved adequate evidence of rehabilitation and reformation. In addition, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had satisfied the following mitigating factors as outlined in the Adjudicative Guidelines: (1) the individual acknowledged his alcohol abuse, provided evidence of actions taken to overcome his

147

PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 6, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his alcohol use. Specifically, the Hearing Officer concluded that the individual, who had been diagnosed by a DOE psychiatrist with Alcohol Abuse, achieved adequate evidence of rehabilitation and reformation. In addition, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had satisfied the following mitigating factors as outlined in the Adjudicative Guidelines: (1) the individual acknowledged his alcohol abuse, provided evidence of actions taken to overcome his

148

PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 6, 2012, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual should be granted a security clearance. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his alcohol consumption. Specifically, the Hearing Officer concluded that the individual's eight months of abstinence and AA attendance, along with the strength of his motivation to stop drinking and his ability to socialize with drinkers without feeling an urge to drink himself, and other factors, were sufficient to demonstrate rehabilitation from Alcohol Abuse. Robert Palmer - Hearing Officer

149

PSH-12-0131 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing 1 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0131 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing On March 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. The Individual had a history of two alcohol-related arrests and an alcohol-related incident at work. A DOE Psychologist found that the individual habitually used alcohol to excess. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual these security concerns at the hearing by presenting evidence that he had more than fully complied with the DOE Psychologist's treatment recommendations and the compelling testimony of his treating counselor. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0131.pdf More Documents & Publications

150

PSH-11-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 12, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual=s access authorization should not be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not resolved the security concerns arising from his illegal drug use, alcohol use, and misrepresentations made during the process regarding his eligibility for access authorization. At the hearing, the Individual did not present any evidence to rebut any of the allegations. He did testify that he stopped drinking alcohol in June or July of 2011, approximately six months prior to the hearing. The DOE psychologist, who diagnosed him as alcohol dependent, testified that this was an insufficient

151

PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 23, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that the DOE should not restore an individual's suspended DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred the individual administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including his April 2012 arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of Alcohol, as well as opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual met the criteria for alcohol abuse disorder and was a user of alcohol habitually to excess. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

152

PSH-12-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 22, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an Individual's DOE security clearance should be restored. The Individual had been caught viewing pornography on a DOE workplace computer. The Individual was examined by a DOE Consultant Psychologist who diagnosed the Individual with an Impulse-Control Disorder NOS. The Individual was, however, able to show that, as a result of therapy, his Impulse-Control Disorder is in remission with a low to low-moderate chance of relapse. For these reasons, the Hearing Officer concluded that the Individual had mitigated the security concerns at the hearing. Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer

153

PSH-13-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On May 23, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be granted. The Individual had a history of six arrests, five of which were alcohol-related and two of which were marijuana-related. In addition, A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol Dependence. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any the security concerns raised by his alcohol abuse and history of criminal conduct at the hearing, because he was only in the early stages of his recovery from his alcohol dependence, and his alcohol dependence was a contributing factor to much of his criminal conduct. The Hearing Officer

154

PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 23, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that the DOE should not restore an individual's suspended DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred the individual administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including his April 2012 arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of Alcohol, as well as opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual met the criteria for alcohol abuse disorder and was a user of alcohol habitually to excess. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

155

PSH-12-0092 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0092 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of five arrests, two of which were alcohol-related. The Individual's pattern of criminal activity included a sex offense against a minor, for which he was incarcerated for a period of over one year. In addition, A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol Dependence. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0092.pdf More Documents & Publications

156

PSH-13-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing Personnel Security Hearing (PSH-13-0074). On September 19, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individual's access authorization. As a security concern under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, a Local Security Office cited the report of the DOE psychologist, in which he concluded that the individual met criteria found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV-TR (DSM-IV-TR) for Opioid Dependence, and that this condition causes, or may cause, a significant defect in judgment and reliability. In accord with the hearing testimony of the DOE psychologist, the Hearing Officer found that there was a low risk that the individual's condition would, in

157

PSH-12-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

94 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 94 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 6, 2012, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his abuse of alcohol. The Hearing Officer further concluded that the individual's six months of responsible behavior regarding alcohol were insufficient to demonstrate a sustained pattern of responsible use. This was because of the brevity of the period of time involved, the individual's failure to admit that he had a drinking problem, and his failure to take steps to address the problem other than abstinence. The Hearing officer also concluded that

158

Western Area Power Administration Record of Decision for the Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region 2004 Power Marketing Program, April 11, 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 81 / Monday, April 28, 1997 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Hearings and Appeals Notice of Cases Filed; Week of February 3 Through February 7, 1997 During the Week of February 3 through February 7, 1997, the appeals, applications, petitions or other requests listed in this Notice were filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. Any person who will be aggrieved by the DOE action sought in any of these cases may file written comments on the application within ten days of publication of this Notice or the date of receipt of actual notice, whichever occurs first. All such comments shall be filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585-0107. Dated: March 3, 1997.

159

PSH-13-0086 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0086 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 29, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. The Record showed that the individual had two DUIs and that a DOE Psychologist also diagnosed him with Alcohol-Abuse. After hearing the testimony of a DOE Psychiatrist that, in his expert opinion, the Individual was far enough along in his recovery to be reformed or rehabilitated from his Alcohol Abuse, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had shown that he was reformed or rehabilitated from his Alcohol-Abuse, and had therefore mitigated the security concerns raised by his Alcohol Abuse and criminal activity since that activity was symptomatic

160

PSH-13-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On May 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under Criteria J and L of 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited a DOE Psychiatrist's diagnosis of Alcohol Dependence, a history of heavy alcohol drinking, and three alcohol-related arrests and one arrest for possession of cocaine. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved the concerns related to his alcohol use as a result of his voluntary treatment following a 2012 relapse after nine years of sobriety. Mental health professionals' opinions at the hearing, as well as evidence of internal motivation and a

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 1, 2012 a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with a the Individual's admission of alcohol misuse, a recent 2011 arrest of Driving While Intoxicated, and a diagnosis by a DOE-contractor psychologist (DOE Psychologist) of Alcohol Related Disorder. At the hearing, the Individual produced testimony indicating that he had completed an Intensive Outpatient Program, participated in an Alcoholics Anonymous program, and had been

162

PSH-12-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

52 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 52 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 2, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because of concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol and prior criminal activity. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. Specifically, he cited the fact that the individual had only recently begun receiving counseling with regard to his use of alcohol and had consumed alcohol as recently as four days prior to

163

PSH-12-0048 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

48 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 48 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0048 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 17, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual drank to intoxication once a week and had been diagnosed as suffering from Alcohol Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, which raised security concerns under Criteria H and J. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, he found that the individual's continued use of alcohol, in particular, his consumption

164

PSH-12-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 16, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with a July 2012 Driving While Intoxicated arrest and a Alcohol Abuse diagnosis by a DOE-Contractor Psychologist. At the hearing, the Individual submitted substantial evidence regarding his successful completion of an intensive outpatient program for his Alcohol Abuse and his intention to forever continue his abstinence from alcohol. The Individual also submitted testimony from others attesting to his changed attitude to alcohol and the

165

PSH-13-0064 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0064 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) cited concerns raised by the individual's use of alcohol habitually to excess and an opinion of a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual's lack of maturity leaves significant questions as to his judgment and reliability. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer did not find that the individual had an "illness or mental condition" that would raise a concern under the DOE regulations, but concluded that the individual had

166

PSH-12-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 1, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that the individual's recent efforts to resolve his debt have not yet withstood the test of time. Given the

167

PSH-12-0085 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

85 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 85 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0085 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 8, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding (1) false statements by the individual during the security clearance process; (2) the individual's problematic use of alcohol; (3) his use past use of illegal drugs. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to mitigate the security concerns raised by his use of illegal drugs, but not those stemming from his false statements and problematic use of alcohol.

168

PSH-11-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

03 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 03 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing Personnel Security Hearing (PSH-11-0003). On February 1, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not grant an individual's access authorization. A DOE consultant psychiatrist, noting that the individual drank to intoxication four times per month, found that the individual was a user of alcohol habitually to excess, and that this pattern of consumption indicated that the individual had an illness or mental condition that causes, or may cause, a significant defect in judgment or reliability. At the hearing in the matter, the individual testified that he had abstained from consuming alcohol since the

169

PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 15, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about falsification and drug use. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F, K and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve the security concerns associated with his marijuana use while in high school. However, she found that the individual had not sufficiently mitigated the security

170

PSH-12-0100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a recent arrest for Aggravated Driving Under the Influence (DUI) and a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE Psychologist) that the individual suffered from Alcohol Dependence. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. The individual had abstained from the use of alcohol in the

171

PSH-12-0077 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

77 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 77 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0077 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 25, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding (1) diagnoses by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE Psychologist) that the individual suffered from Alcohol Dependence and Personality Disorder NOS; (2) the individual's history of problematic alcohol use; (3) prior criminal conduct of the individual; (4) evidence of the individual's financial irresponsibility; and (5) inconsistent information provided to DOE during the security clearance process. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer

172

PSH-12-0097 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0097 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 29, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had been charged with committing a sexual battery. Although the Individual had testified that a jury had acquitted him of this charge, the Individual did not provide any documentation that he had been acquitted. Nor had the Individual presented sufficient evidence to resolve the concerns raised by his conduct. The Individual had also intentionally provided misleading information during a personnel security interview. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing.

173

PSH-12-0101 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0101 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 21, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that it was too early to determine whether the individual had demonstrated a sustained pattern of financial responsibility for a

174

PSH-13-0083 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0083 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 21, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Record showed that the individual had a history of three alcohol-related arrests. A DOE Psychologist also diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Abuse. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not shown that he was reformed or rehabilitated from his Alcohol-Abuse. Nor had the individual mitigated the security concerns raised by his criminal activity since that activity was symptomatic of his Alcohol Abuse. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-13-0083.pdf More Documents & Publications

175

PSH-12-0104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's alcohol use. A DOE psychiatrist examined the individual and concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. His behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H and J. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that the individual had

176

PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 2, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through his two bankruptcies within ten years, his current debts, and his inability or unwillingness to live within his means. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security

177

PSH-12-0059 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

59 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 59 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0059 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. The Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about the individual's falsifications and financial irresponsibility. The individual's behavior raised concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. Specifically, she found that despite the individual's acknowledgment of his financially

178

PSH-12-0133 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0133 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about his misrepresentations and misuse of information technology. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual presented sufficient evidence to resolve the security concerns associated with his misuse of information technology. However, she found that the individual had not sufficiently mitigated the

179

PSH-12-0073 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

73 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 73 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0073 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 8, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's alcohol use. A DOE consultant psychologist found that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence, in early full remission. His behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H, J and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual demonstrated adequate evidence of rehabilitation and thus mitigated the security concerns under Criteria H and J. She

180

PSH-13-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 26 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In November and December 2012, as part of a background investigation, the local security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about the individual's pattern of criminal conduct. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate the security concerns associated with his three charges of Driving

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

PSH-12-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had resolved the security concerns arising from his alcohol use. The Individual was diagnosed by a DOE psychologist with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. In addition, the Individual had five alcohol-related incidents in his past, including a positive Breath Alchol Test (BAT) in March 2012. The hearing officer found that the Local Security Office (LSO) properly raised security concerns under Criteria H, J, and L.

182

PSH-13-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On May 1, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual should be granted a security clearance. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding foreign influence and foreign preference, and specifically regarding his multiple citizenships and foreign passports. The Hearing Officer based his decision on the individual's expressed willingness to renounce his foreign citizenships and refrain from using his foreign passports, the routine nature of his foreign holdings, the fact that the other countries of which the individual is a citizen have friendly

183

PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 11, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for providing false information on a Questionnaire for National Security Positions and failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within simited access areas. This behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F, G, and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, he

184

PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 2, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through his two bankruptcies within ten years, his current debts, and his inability or unwillingness to live within his means. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security

185

PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 4, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about falsification and drug use. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F, K and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, with respect to the individual's omissions on security forms, she found that the requisite element of "deliberateness" was

186

PSH-13-0069 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0069 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In April 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his positive drug test. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under the Bond Amendment and Criteria K and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer concluded the individual's use of his wife's prescription medication happened under unusual circumstances that are unlikely to recur in the future, and to the

187

PSH-12-0113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 18, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be granted. The Individual had a history of two alcohol alcohol-related arrests. In addition, A DOE Psychologist found that the Individual would consume four to six alcoholic beverages during an evening on a weekly basis. The Psychologist accordingly concluded that the individual habitually used alcohol to excess. The Hearing Officer found that, since the Individual continued to drink excessive amounts of alcohol, he had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. PSH-12-0113.pdf More Documents & Publications

188

Industry Structure Dynamics and the Nature of Technology in The Hearing Instrument Industry  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Patterns of innovation in industry. Technology Review. Vol.alignment equipment industry. RAND Journal of Economics,in the hearing instrument industry. CISTEMA Working Paper,

Lotz, Peter

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

PSH-11-0032 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

his 2002, 2006, and 2010 bankruptcy filings within the time period required by relevant DOE directives. The hearing officer found, though the individual had taken genuine steps...

190

The Catholic University of America, George Washington University, and American Universitys U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon 2013 Market Appeal Jury Feedback  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CAPITOL DC CAPITOL DC POINTS APPROACH EQUALS EXCEEDS ECLIPSES 0-60% 61-80% 81-90% 91-100% A. LIVABILITY 1 Is the operation of the house's lighting, entertainment, and other controls intuitive? X 2 Does the design offer the occupant(s) a safe, functional, convenient, comfortable, and enjoyable place to live X 3 Are the unique needs and desires of the target client met by the design? X B. MARKETABILITY 1 Does the house demonstrate curb appeal, interior appeal, and quality craftsmanship? X 2 Do the house's sustainability features and strategies make a positive contribution to its marketability? X 3 Does the house offer a good value to potential homebuyers? X C. BUILDABILITY 1 Are the drawings and construction specifications of

191

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 8, 2003 July 8, 2003 VEE-0095 - In the Matter of OLS Energy-Camarillo This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the July 8, 2003 VEE-0092 - In the Matter of Cargill, Incorporated. This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the July 8, 2003 VEE-0091 - In the Matter of Jefferson Smurfit Corp. This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the July 8, 2003 VEE-0090 - In the Matter of Smurfitt Stone Container Corp.

192

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval Reactor Programs before the House Appropriations Committee, Energy and Water Development Subcommittee | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony on Nuclear ...

193

FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Naval Reactor Programs before the House Appropriations Committee, Energy and Water Development Subcommittee | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Congressional Testimony > FY 2012 Budget Hearing Testimony on Nuclear ...

194

PSH-12-0096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual's access authorization should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not resolved the security concerns arising from her diagnosis of Narcissistic Personality Disorder or her misuse of technology. The Individual was diagnosed by a DOE psychologist with NPD and Adjustment Disorder, with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. The DOE psychologist found that the NPD was an illness or mental condition which causes or may cause a significant defect in judgment or reliability. The Individual presented the

195

PSH-13-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 10, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In March 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use and alcohol-related incidents. During that PSI, the individual was referred to a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) for an agency-sponsored evaluation who concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Abuse. The individual's behavior raised security concerns Criteria H, J and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial

196

PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 5, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that access authorization should not be granted to an individual. A Local Security Office denied access authorization to the individual because she demonstrated financial irresponsibility through (1) failing to file federal and state income taxes for seven years, Tax Year (TY) 2004 through TY 2010; (2) accruing unpaid federal tax liability of $37,619.37 and unpaid state tax liability of $6,885.00; and (3) claiming nine tax withholding allowances when she knew she should only claim one. Her behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

197

PSH-12-0083 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

83 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security 83 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0083 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 14, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within limited access areas and for failing to report such non-compliance. This behavior raised security concerns under Criteria G and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security

198

PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 41 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 26, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The individual had a history of three arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. The individual also had two incidents at work involving alcohol. The individual also had a longstanding history of minor financial irresponsibility. A DOE Psychiatrist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Abuse/Alcohol Dependence and Cognitive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (CDNOS). The Hearing Officer found that the DOE Psychiatrist could not explain or defend either of his alcohol diagnosis's and that the DOE Psychiatrist was unwilling to conclude that the Individual's

199

PSH-13-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 15, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under Criterion L of 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's dual citizenship, his holding a passport issued by his country of birth and substantial investments maintained in that country, and his availing himself of benefits available to citizens of that country. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved these concerns: the individual was willing to relinquish his foreign citizenship, no longer intended to renew his now expired foreign passport, and had transferred the majority of his

200

PSH-12-0066 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

66 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 66 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0066 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing A Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with a recent Driving Under the Influence arrest and a determination from a DOE-contractor Psychologist that the Individual suffered from Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. Additionally, while finding that the Individual had resolved Criterion L concerns relating to inaccurate answers provided in a background investigation, a Questionnaire for National Security Positions, and a personnel security interview, the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 26, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The individual had a history of three arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. The individual also had two incidents at work involving alcohol. The individual also had a longstanding history of minor financial irresponsibility. A DOE Psychiatrist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Abuse/Alcohol Dependence and Cognitive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (CDNOS). The Hearing Officer found that the DOE Psychiatrist could not explain or defend either of his alcohol diagnosis's and that the DOE Psychiatrist was unwilling to conclude that the Individual's

202

PSH-12-0079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 12, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because of concerns regarding the individual's prior use of heroin and an opinion of a DOE consultant psychologist that the individual suffered from Opiate Dependence and Learning Disorder Not Otherwise Specified. A Local Security Office cited this information as the basis for security concerns under the Bond Amendment and 10 C.F.R. Part 710. The Hearing Officer found that that the individual resolved the concern related to his use of

203

PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

43 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 43 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 28, 2012, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with her excessive consumption of alcohol in college and a determination from a DOE-contractor Psychologist (DOE-Psychologist), that, despite possessing good judgment and reliability, the Individual suffered from Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, and had been a user of alcohol habitually to excess in the past. To demonstrate adequate evidence of rehabilitation, the DOE Psychologist opined that the Individual would

204

PSH-12-0130 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0130 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's 2001 indictment for violation of a federal criminal statute governing conduct of federal employees, and security infractions that she committed in 2010 and 2011, while in her current position, when she brought a cell phone into a Controlled Access Area. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved the concern raised by the 2010 and 2011 security infractions, given her lack of intent, the isolated nature of the events, the fact that she received

205

PSH-13-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 9, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under Criteria H and J of 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited a DOE Psychiatrist's diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder and Alcohol-Related Disorder (Not Otherwise Specified), a history of annual alcohol intoxication, and an October 2012 event in which the individual self-treated his depression with sleeping pills and beer. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved the concerns related to his depression and inappropriate alcohol use as a result of his voluntary treatment following the October 2012

206

PSH-13-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In April 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use. During that PSI, the individual was referred to a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) for an agency-sponsored evaluation who concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H and J. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the

207

PSH-12-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

63 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 63 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office (LSO) suspended the individual's security clearance because (1) a DOE consultant psychiatrist diagnosed the individual as suffering from Alcohol Abuse/Dependence, (2) the individual had been arrested four times on alcohol-related charges and had received substance abuse treatment, and (3) the individual had a history of criminal behavior, of financial irresponsibility, and of failing to keep commitments made to the LSO. This derogatory information raised security concerns under Criteria H, J, and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

208

PSH-12-0123 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

23 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 23 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0123 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 15, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office cited the individual's filing of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition in 2002, and the individual's more recent financial difficulties, including a number of delinquent debts, the largest of which was a $132,489 mortgage balance, payments on which were over 150 days past due. The Hearing Officer found that, while the individual had made some progress toward paying off his prior debts, significant debts remained unpaid, including his mortgage, and the individual had, in addition,

209

PSH-13-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 26, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual's access authorization should not be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not resolved the security concerns arising from an opinion of a licensed medical professional that he has a mental condition which causes or may cause a significant defect in judgment and reliability and the Individual's past unreliable behavior. A DOE psychologist opined that the Individual has a mental trait that makes him unreliable. The Local Security Office (LSO) raised the DOE psychologist's opinion as a security concern under Criterion H of the Part 710 regulations. The LSO

210

PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 28, 2012, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with her excessive consumption of alcohol in college and a determination from a DOE-contractor Psychologist (DOE-Psychologist), that, despite possessing good judgment and reliability, the Individual suffered from Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, and had been a user of alcohol habitually to excess in the past. To demonstrate adequate evidence of rehabilitation, the DOE Psychologist opined that the Individual would

211

How appealing is "Free"?.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??Many marketing strategies seem based on the notion that consumers respond more strongly to products that are being offered for free than a rational calculation (more)

Corbett, Karina

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

212

Poli A. Marmolejos  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Poli A. Marmolejos currently serves as Director of the Department of Energys Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). OHA has jurisdiction for conducting administrative hearings and...

213

The Molecular Mechanics of Hearing and Deafness | Advanced Photon Source  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cementing the Structure of CSHs Cementing the Structure of CSHs Self- and X-ray-Induced Crystallization of Supramolecular Filaments An Anti-Cancer Drug that Stunts Tumor Growth Metallic Glass Yields Secrets under Pressure The Structure of the "Swine Flu" Virus Science Highlights Archives: 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 2001 | 2000 | 1998 | Subscribe to APS Science Highlights rss feed The Molecular Mechanics of Hearing and Deafness APRIL 23, 2010 Bookmark and Share Cadherin-23 stretching simulations. A close-up view of the linker region between cadherin-23 repeats 1 and 2 is shown during a molecular dynamics simulation in which the protein is stretched from both ends. The simulations mimic in vivo conditions in which tip-link cadherins are

214

VBA-0061- In the Matter of Bernard Cowan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On July 18, 2002, Argonne National Laboratory-West (ANL or the contractor) filed an appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued by an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer...

215

TBA-0042- In the Matter of Curtis Hall  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Decision considers two Appeals of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on March 15, 2007, by a Hearing Officer in the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). The...

216

Applications of virtual reality for visually impaired people  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper describes in detail the development and applications of a Virtual Reality Simulator for Visually Impaired People. It makes an auditory representation of the virtual environment, rendering the virtual world entirely through the hearing. The ... Keywords: electromagnetic position tracker, spatial sound, virtual reality, visually impaired

M. A. Torres-Gil; O. Casanova-Gonzalez; J. L. Gonzalez-Mora

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

217

Energy and water development appropriations for 1985. Part 6. Hearings before the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 6 of the hearing record covers testimony by representatives of DOE and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) which was given in Executive Session over four days because of the sensitive nature of some of the information. The DOE witnesses discussed the design, testing, and manufacture of nuclear weapons and described DOE support for military applications of inertial fusion. Other responsibilities include the production, verification and monitoring of nuclear materials, and the dissemination of classified information. Chairman Nunzio Palladino and other officials of the NRC were asked to include comments on the licensing problems at the Byron and Zimmer plants in their review of the NRC budget requirements and program plans.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

FIA-12-0068- In the Matter of Amy Woodward  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On November 29, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Golden Field Office ...

219

FIA-13-0003- In the Matter the National Security Archive  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On February 4, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of...

220

FIA-13-0019- In the Matter of Emily Meredith  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On April 25, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision remanding an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of Information...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

FIA-13-0001- In the matter of Daniel J. Gage  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On January 23, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision remanding an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Golden Field Office...

222

FIA-13-0028- In the Matter of WyoFile  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On May 23, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the National Energy...

223

FIA-13-0046- In the Matter of Gail M. Sullivan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On July 10, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of Legacy...

224

FIA-13-0010- In the Matter of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On March 20, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision remanding an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of Fossil...

225

FIA-13-0033- In the Matter of the Washington Examiner  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On June 10, 2013 the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energys...

226

FIA-12-0038 - In the Matter of Firas Shaikh | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FIA-12-0038 - In the Matter of Firas Shaikh FIA-12-0038 - In the Matter of Firas Shaikh The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting an appeal (Appeal) from...

227

FIA-12-0065 - In the Matter of Advanced Technology Corporation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On October 31, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy...

228

FIA-13-0048- In the Matter of Ralph Stanton  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On July 17, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying a consolidated appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Idaho...

229

FIA-12-0060- In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On November 1, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy...

230

PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's history of criminal conduct, financial problems, and past use of alcohol habitually to excess. The LSO also cited the report of a DOE Psychologist, in which he identified the individual's lack of control over his spending and use of alcohol as a mental condition that causes a significant defect in his judgment and reliability. The Hearing Officer found that (1) the individual had not resolved the concerns raised by his problematic use of alcohol, as he had received no treatment in the six

231

PSH-12-0093 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0093 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual should be granted authorization access. A Local Security Office denied the individual a security clearance because (1) during the five-year period that the individual attended a university his use of alcohol regularly resulted in his intoxication, including at least 100 instances in which the individual either passed-out or blacked-out and two instances in which law enforcement officers were involved and (2) the individual had been diagnosed with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, by a DOE psychologist. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H and J.

232

PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's history of criminal conduct, financial problems, and past use of alcohol habitually to excess. The LSO also cited the report of a DOE Psychologist, in which he identified the individual's lack of control over his spending and use of alcohol as a mental condition that causes a significant defect in his judgment and reliability. The Hearing Officer found that (1) the individual had not resolved the concerns raised by his problematic use of alcohol, as he had received no treatment in the six months since being arrested for DWI, and had previously relapsed after

233

PSH-12-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision finding that the individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local DOE Office had referred the individual's request for a security clearance to administrative review under 10 CFR Part 710 citing the following information as security concerns: (1) an opinion in December 2011 by a DOE psychiatrist that the individual meets the criteria set forth in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association, 4th edition, Text Revised (DSM-IV-TR) for Alcohol Dependence, in partial remission; (2) a 2001 charge for public intoxication; and (3) admissions by the individual that he drinks to escape job-related stress; that his wife

234

PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual had suffered from Alcohol Dependence, which since had attenuated to Alcohol Abuse; the recommendation of the individual's primary care physician that the individual stop consuming alcohol and the physician's diagnoses of alcoholism, alcoholic hepatitis, liver damage, and type 2 diabetes; and statements by the individual regarding his use of alcohol and efforts at

235

PSH-13-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual had suffered from Alcohol Dependence, which since had attenuated to Alcohol Abuse; the recommendation of the individual's primary care physician that the individual stop consuming alcohol and the physician's diagnoses of alcoholism, alcoholic hepatitis, liver damage, and type 2 diabetes; and statements by the individual regarding his use of alcohol and efforts at

236

PSH-12-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual's present employer, a DOE contractor, has requested a DOE access authorization for the individual. The individual completed and submitted an Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations Processing (QNSP) in November 2011. DOE Exhibit 8. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the individual in January 2012. DOE Exhibit 9. In March 2012, a DOE-consultant Psychologist evaluated the individual, and memorialized his findings in a Psychological Assessment Report (the Report). PSH-12-0050.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-11-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

237

PSH-12-0129 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On February 14, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individuals DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of two...

238

PSH-12-0126 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 26 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0126 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual tested positive on a random Breath Alcohol Test (BAT). The individual acknowledged that, since 2009, he would routinely drink to 18 12-ounce beers each weekend and has become intoxicated almost weekly. Subsequent to testing positive on the random BAT, the individual began to abstain from drinking all alcohol and commenced an intensive outpatient alcohol treatment program (IOP). At the conclusion of the IOP, the individual was evaluated by a DOE consulting

239

PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual had suffered from Alcohol Dependence, which since had attenuated to Alcohol Abuse; the recommendation of the individual's primary care physician that the individual stop consuming alcohol and the physician's diagnoses of alcoholism, alcoholic hepatitis, liver damage, and type 2 diabetes; and statements by the individual regarding his use of alcohol and efforts at

240

PSH-13-0012 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0012 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 17, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual should be granted authorization access. When the individual was 17 years old (2007), he was diagnosed with sudden onset diabetes (Type 1 - Insulin Dependent). While hospitalized to stabilize his diabetes, he was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder NOS. Three months later, immediately following a traumatic telephone call with his girlfriend, he ingested a handful of over-the-counter medication in a suicide attempt. He was diagnosed with "Depression NOS." The individual disclosed his history of treatment for psychological disorders when he applied for access authorization four-and-one-half years later. A DOE

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In February and April 2012, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted Personnel Security Interviews (PSIs) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use, drug use and falsifications. In addition to the PSIs, the LSO recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in May 2012 and determined that he suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist also reported that the individual had been previously

242

PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In February and April 2012, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted Personnel Security Interviews (PSIs) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use, drug use and falsifications. In addition to the PSIs, the LSO recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in May 2012 and determined that he suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist also reported that the individual had been previously

243

PSH-12-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

37 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 37 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor in a position that requires a DOE security clearance. Based upon the receipt of derogatory information relating to an unpaid debt, the Local Security Office (LSO) called the Individual in for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Ex. 7. After the PSI, the LSO informed the Individual that unresolved derogatory information created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for access authorization. Notification Letter dated March 5, 2012; DOE Ex. 1; 10 C.F.R. § 710.8(l) (Criterion L). PSH-12-0037.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0069 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

244

PSH-11-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a DOE contractor and was granted a DOE access authorization in 2007 after a Local Security Office (LSO) mitigated some derogatory information, including concerns about the individual's finances. Issues regarding the individual's finances surfaced again in 2010. After two Personnel Security Interviews, one in 2010 and the other in 2011, failed to resolve the derogatory information regarding the individual's finances, the LSO suspended the individual's access authorization and sought permission to initiate administrative review proceedings Affirmed (OS November 9, 2012) PSH-11-0026.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0121 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

245

PSH-12-0118 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0118 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On January 17, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual had incurred $20,000 in charges while patronizing a "gentleman's club" on a single evening; approximately $17,000 of that amount was charged to his corporate credit card. His employer's staff psychologists were concerned about the role of alcohol consumption in this incident. Following psychological evaluations, the individual was diagnosed as suffering from Alcohol Abuse. The LSO suspended his access authorization citing Criteria H, J and L. After conducting a

246

PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. Following the investigation by a DOE contractor that one of its managerial employees had engaged in sexual harassment and retaliation, the employee was disciplined and transferred to another position. The investigation concluded the individual had directed derogatory comments, epithets and slurs referencing sexual orientation towards subordinates (not thought to be gay); targeting such comments most heavily towards employees who were suspected of complaining to management about the work unit; directing subordinates not to speak to management with the individual's

247

VBH-0036 - In the Matter of Whistle Blower Hearing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VBH-0036 - In the Matter of Whistle Blower Hearing VBH-0036 - In the Matter of Whistle Blower Hearing VBH-0036 - In the Matter of Whistle Blower Hearing XXXXXXX (the complainant) filed a complaint against his employer, Fluor Daniel, Inc. (FDI), and two other DOE contractors, Duke Engineering & Services (DE&S) and TRW Environmental Safety Systems (TRW), pursuant to the DOE's Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In that complaint, the complainant alleges that he suffered reprisals because he had made a disclosure that is protected by Part 708. vbh0036n.pdf More Documents & Publications VWZ-0009 - In the Matter of Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. VBU-0039 - In the Matter of Edward J. Seawalt VBH-0036 - In the Matter of Whistle Blower Hearing

248

PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. Following the investigation by a DOE contractor that one of its managerial employees had engaged in sexual harassment and retaliation, the employee was disciplined and transferred to another position. The investigation concluded the individual had directed derogatory comments, epithets and slurs referencing sexual orientation towards subordinates (not thought to be gay); targeting such comments most heavily towards employees who were suspected of complaining to management about the work unit; directing subordinates not to speak to management with the individual's

249

PSH-13-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 20, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. Following an anonymous report, the Human Reliability Program at the individual's site investigated a report that the individual had been found incoherent and naked at a local convenience store one morning at 2am by one of his co-workers. During this investigation, the individual's HRP certification was suspended. As the investigation was being completed, the individual's access authorization came due for a periodic re-investigation. During that investigation, the individual reported higher alcohol consumption than he had during the earlier Personnel Security

250

PSH-13-0046- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On July 16, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individuals access authorization. As security concerns under CriterionL of 10...

251

PSH-12-0132- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On March 4, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individuals access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710,...

252

GRR/Elements/18-CA-c.12 - WDR Public Hearing | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

WDR Public Hearing < GRR | Elements Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections 18-CA-c.12 - WDR Public...

253

PSH-13-0005- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On May 16, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individuals access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a...

254

PSH-12-0071- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On October 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individuals DOE access authorization should not be restored. Criminal charges and civil had been filed...

255

PSH-13-0011 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On May 20, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individuals DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had been criminally charged...

256

No Slide Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Human Capital Officer Chief Financial Officer Assistant Secretary for Policy & International Affairs Management Hearings & Appeals Health Safety & Security Chief Information...

257

EIA Cases  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

eia-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 eia-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en TEE-0073 - In the Matter of Cole Distributing, Inc. http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0073-matter-cole-distributing-inc TEE-0073 - In the Matter of Cole Distributing, Inc.

258

FIA-12-0028 - In the Matter of USA Today | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FIA-12-0028 - In the Matter of USA Today FIA-12-0028 - In the Matter of USA Today FIA-12-0028 - In the Matter of USA Today The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of Information Resources (OIR). The appellant filed a FOIA request for records pertaining to a loan guarantee application filed by the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC) for the American Centrifuge Project, and asked for expedited processing of the request. OIR denied the request for expedited processing, and USA Today appealed. In granting the Appeal, OHA cited court decisions finding sufficient urgency to grant expedited processing where there is a significant interest in quickly disseminating news regarding a subject currently under debate by

259

08/2003 printingStandards Update to Chapter 296-817 WAC, Hearing Loss Prevention (Noise) Issue Date 8/2003  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ease of use the safety standards for Hearing Conservation. Hearing Conservation rules, in chapter 296-62 WAC, Part K, were rewritten and adopted as chapter 296-817

Effective Date; Wisha Core Rules

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

260

PSH-12-0002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

02 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 02 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual has been employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor since 1997, and has held a DOE access authorization for over 10 years. In October 2011, the individual tested positive for marijuana on a random drug test. The local security office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the individual in October 2011, and he admitted that he had used marijuana from 2007 to 2011 while in possession of a DOE security clearance. He also admitted that although he had certified on a January 2011 personnel security questionnaire that he had never illegally used a controlled substance while possessing a security clearance, he had

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

PSH-12-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed at a DOE facility where his work requires him to have an access authorization. In December 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address his alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in February 2012 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). According to the DOE psychiatrist, the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist further concluded

262

PSH-12-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

44 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 44 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility and has possessed a security clearance on various occasions since 1978. Exhibit (Ex.) 8 at 2. In December 2011, the Individual reported to the Local Security Office (LSO) that his wages were being garnished for back federal taxes. Ex. 13 at 1. Consequently, the LSO conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the Individual in January 2012. Ex. 15. Because the PSI and further investigation indicated that the Individual had not filed state and federal tax returns for several years and had a number of delinquent financial accounts, the LSO informed the Individual in a March 2012 notification

263

TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. He provided inconsistent information on four separate occasions to the Local Security Office (LSO) concerning his diagnosis and treatment for mental health issues: in his responses to two Questionnaires for National Security Positions (QNSPs) in 2003 and 2009, during a background investigation interview conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 2006, and during a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) in 2010. The LSO could not resolve these discrepancies to its satisfaction, so it referred the individual to a DOE

264

PSH-12-0046 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0046 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. During 2009 through 2011, the individual used hydrocodone other than as directed and was consuming increasing amounts of alcohol. In October 2011, he voluntarily admitted himself into a substance abuse program at a local hospital. Upon discharge from the hospital, a psychologist diagnosed the individual with alcohol and opioid dependence. Because this information raised concerns about the individual's continued eligibility for access authorization, the local security office (LSO) called him in for an interview with a personnel security specialist. After the Personnel Security Interview (PSI) failed to

265

PSH-12-0029 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 29 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0029 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor in a position requiring him to hold a DOE access authorization. DOE Ex. 3. In December 2010, while on disability leave due to a medical condition, the Individual voluntarily entered an inpatient substance abuse facility to receive treatment for alcohol dependence. DOE Ex. 8. The Individual reported his treatment to his management, who in turn informed the Local Security Office (LSO). DOE Ex. 10 at 8-9. This potentially derogatory information prompted a March 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Ex. 10. After the PSI, the LSO referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE

266

TSO-1105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual currently is employed by a DOE contractor, and has held a DOE security clearance for several years. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the individual in June 2011. PSI, DOE Ex. 6. In August 2011, the LSO suspended the individual's DOE security clearance and issued her a Notification Letter, together with a statement (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information that created a substantial doubt about the individual's eligibility to hold a DOE security clearance. (DOE Ex. 1). Specifically, the LSO alleges that the individual has raised a concern under 10 C.F.R. § 710.8(f) (Criterion F)

267

PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor. Based upon the receipt of derogatory information, the Local Security Office (LSO) called the Individual in for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI). As a result of the PSI, the Individual was referred to a local psychologist (the DOE psychologist) for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist prepared a written report setting forth the results of that evaluation. DOE Ex. 6. After reviewing the DOE psychologist's report, the LSO informed the Individual that derogatory information created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for access authorization. PSH-11-0018.pdf More Documents & Publications

268

TSO-1111 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 11 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1111 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The administrative review proceeding began with the issuance of a Notification Letter to the Individual. See 10 C.F.R. § 710.21. The letter informed the Individual that information in the possession of the DOE created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for a security clearance. Specifically, the Local Security Office (LSO) characterized this information as indicating that the Individual had engaged in unusual conduct which brought his honesty, trustworthiness, and reliability into question, and had been found by a psychologist to meet the criteria for alcohol abuse set forth in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (Text

269

TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, and has possessed a DOE accessauthorization for over twenty years. As a result of information that he disclosed to the DOE in connection withan arrest, the individual was asked for additional information at a Personnel Security Interview conducted in September 2001 (the 2001 PSI). Subsequently, the individual was referred to a psychiatrist (hereafter the "DOEConsultant Psychiatrist"), who conducted a psychiatric evaluation of the individual in March 2002. Following this evaluation, the individual's access authorization was suspended and in August 2002, the Manager of the DOE'slocal Operations Office issued a Notification Letter

270

PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor. Based upon the receipt of derogatory information, the Local Security Office (LSO) called the Individual in for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI). As a result of the PSI, the Individual was referred to a local psychologist (the DOE psychologist) for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist prepared a written report setting forth the results of that evaluation. DOE Ex. 6. After reviewing the DOE psychologist's report, the LSO informed the Individual that derogatory information created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for access authorization. PSH-11-0018.pdf More Documents & Publications

271

TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and has held a security clearance at the request of her employer since 1991. In November 2009, the individual was apprehended after shoplifting at a local store and the local police department gave her a citation for shoplifting. She reported the incident to the local security office (LSO) and the LSO conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the individual in December 2009. The individual stated that she did not intentionally steal any items and that she would not repeat her actions. The LSO concluded that the security concern was mitigated because the incident occurred under

272

TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and has held a security clearance at the request of his employer since 2008. In August 2010, the individual tested positive for alcohol during an employment-related screening. He admitted consuming 10-12 beers the night before the test. The local security office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the individual in October 2010, wherein he admitted consuming at least one six-pack of beer nightly for the previous four years. The PSI did not resolve the security concerns regarding his alcohol use and the individual agreed to be evaluated by a DOE consultant-psychiatrist. In November 2010, a DOE consultant-psychiatrist

273

PSH-13-0097 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing 7 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0097 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI), with a personnel security specialist on June 4, 2013, in order to address issues raised by an information report that he had failed to meet his income tax obligations and had his wages garnished by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as a result. Exhibits 5, 8. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns

274

PSH-12-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual began his DOE-related job in August 2006. Ex. D at 19, 53, 70-71. In a September 2007 personnel security interview (PSI), the individual stated that he had been charged with Possession of Marijuana in December 1995 and Minor in Possession in July 2001. See Ex. 8 at 20, 78-79. On his September 2011 QNSP, he denied that he had ever been charged with or convicted of an alcohol or drug-related offense. Ex. 11. In a November 2011 Letter of Interrogatory, the local security office (LSO) asked the individual why he had not acknowledged his December 1995 charge for Possession of Marijuana and his July 2001 charge for Minor in Possession. Ex. 9. In response, the individual indicated that he had been charged with

275

PSH-11-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual currently is employed by a DOE contractor, and that contractor has requested that he receive a DOE security clearance. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview with the individual in May 2011 (the 2011 PSI, DOE Ex. 17). In July 2011, a DOE-consultant psychiatrist evaluated the individual, and memorialized her findings in a Psychological Evaluation Report (the Report, DOE Ex. 6). In October 2011, the LSO issued a Notification Letter to the individual, together with a Summary of Security Concerns (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information

276

PSH-12-0053 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

53 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 53 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0053 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization since 1980. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 6. In October 2006, after reviewing the Individual's credit report during a routine reinvestigation in connection with her security clearance, the Local Security Office (LSO) requested that the Individual participate in a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) in order to discuss concerns raised by the Individual's finances. DOE Ex. 14. The Individual's security clearance was continued at that time. DOE Ex. 6. During a subsequent routine reinvestigation of the Individual's security clearance in 2011, concerns regarding the Individual's delinquent accounts and outstanding judgments surfaced. The

277

PSH-12-0042 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

42 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 42 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0042 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing This case involves an Individual who failed to meet his financial obligations during the final years of his first marriage. The Individual reported the repossession of his motor vehicle and a home foreclosure to the Local Security Office (LSO) in 2008. The LSO subsequently conducted a series of three Personal Security Interviews (PSI) of the Individual, the most recent on February 1, 2012. Unable to resolve the security concerns raised by the Individual's failure to resolve his financial issues, the LSO initiated administrative review proceedings by issuing a letter (Notification Letter) advising the Individual that it possessed reliable information that created a substantial doubt regarding his eligibility to

278

PSH-12-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on November 9, 2011, Exhibit 4, in order to address issues surrounding his finances. Id. at 12-13. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns and the reasons for those concerns. Exhibit 1. The Notification Letter also informed the

279

PSH-12-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. In September of 2011, the individual informed his contractor, which in turn informed the local DOE security office (LSO), that he had been hospitalized for treatment of his depression and suicidal thoughts. Exhibit 15. The LSO summoned the individual for an interview with a personnel security specialist on September 20, 2011. Exhibit 22 (Transcript of Personnel Security Interview). After this Personnel Security Interview (PSI), the LSO referred the individual to a local psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist) for an agency-sponsored evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist prepared a written

280

PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. In June 2012, the individual was arrested and charged with Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated (DWI). Exhibits 7, 8. Because of the concern this arrest raised, a Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on July 30, 2012. Exhibit 16 (PSI Transcript). After the PSI, the LSO referred the individual to a local psychologist (hereinafter referred to as "the DOE Psychologist") for an agency-sponsored evaluation. The DOE Psychologist prepared a written report, setting forth the results of that

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

PSH-11-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual currently is employed by a DOE contractor, and that contractor has requested that he receive a DOE security clearance. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview with the individual in August 2011 (the 2011 PSI, DOE Ex. 8). In September 2011, a DOE-consultant psychologist (the DOE-consultant Psychologist) evaluated the individual, and memorialized her findings in a Psychological Evaluation Report (the Report, DOE Ex. 6). In October 2011, the LSO issued a Notification Letter to the individual, together with a Summary of Security Concerns (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information that created a

282

PSH-12-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. In 2007 through 2009, the individual provided inconsistent information to the Local Security Office (LSO) concerning his use of alcohol and failed to report an arrest that occurred in 2003. Because the LSO could not resolve these discrepancies and the reporting failure to its satisfaction, it determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a Notification Letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns and

283

PSH-12-0035 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

35 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 35 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0035 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed in a position that requires him to maintain a DOE access authorization, which he had been granted. See Ex. 3 at 1. On an August 2011 Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP), the individual disclosed a June 2007 vehicle repossession and a March 2010 wage garnishment for $2,000 that stemmed from a debt to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Ex. 4 at 8. He also disclosed a 2011 citation for No Proof of Registration. Id. at 7. In December 2011, the local security office (LSO) invited the individual to a personnel security interview (PSI) to explain his finances and his disclosures. PSH-12-0035.pdf More Documents & Publications

284

TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed at a Department of Energy (DOE) facility where his work requires him to have an access authorization. In September 2010, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address the individual's alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual. In November 2010, a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist) conducted a forensic psychiatric examination and concluded that the individual met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental

285

PSH-11-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization for anumber of years. Exhibit (Ex.) 18 at 8. During the period August 2009 through November 2009,the Individual went to his office in a secured building late at night during non-duty hours. Ex. 15.Further, the Individual had made several unauthorized purchases from his government-issuedcredit card during that period. Ex. 15. In explaining these events to his superiors, the Individual asserted that the incidents were a result of his experiencing a manic episode of his Bipolar Disorder. Ex. 15 at 7. This disclosure prompted the Local Security Office (LSO) to conduct aJanuary 2010 Personnel Security Interview (2010 PSI) with the

286

TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and held an access authorization until it was recently suspended. During a routine reinvestigation of the individual, he informed an Office of Personnel Management (OPM) investigator on February 16, 2011, that he had not filed federal or state income tax returns for several years. Exhibit 6 at 13. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on June 23, 2011. Exhibit 9. The LSO ultimately determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth

287

PSH-12-0027 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

27 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 27 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0027 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing In October 2011, pursuant to an investigation, the Local Security Office obtained the Individual's credit report. The credit report indicated that the Individual had a number of accounts either in collection or which were charged off. Exhibit (Ex.) 13 at 1-6. Consequently, the DOE facility's Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the Individual in January 2012. Ex. 19. The 2012 PSI failed to resolve the security concerns due to the Individual's excessive indebtedness. Consequently, the LSO, in a February 2012 notification letter (Notification Letter) informed the Individual as to the derogatory information that

288

PSH-12-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 21 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility. The Local Security Office (LSO) received information that the Individual had not filed a state income tax return for the year 2007. Exhibit (Ex.) 3 at 1. Consequently, LSO conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the Individual in October 2011. Ex. 7. Because the 2011 PSI failed to resolve the security concerns raised by the Individual's failure to file tax returns, the LSO informed the Individual, in a February 2012 notification letter (Notification Letter), that derogatory information existed which raised security concerns under 10 C.F.R. § 710.8 (l) (Criterion L) and that her security clearance was suspended. Ex. 1. The Notification Letter

289

PSH-12-0020 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 20 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0020 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a DOE contractor, and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. Based on financial issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) issued letters of interrogatory (LOI) to the individual in August 2009 and June 2011. DOE Exs. 18 and 16. The LSO also conducted Personnel Security Interviews (PSIs) with the individual in December 2010, November 2011 and December 2011. DOE Exs. 20, 21 and 22. In January 2012, the LSO issued the individual a Notification Letter, together with a Summary of Security Concerns (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information that created a substantial doubt about his eligibility to hold a DOE security clearance.

290

PSH-11-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held an access authorization for several years. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 6 at 1. Pursuant to an investigation, it was discovered that the Individual, for a second period of time, had not filed state or federal tax returns. Ex. 4 at 1-2. This discovery prompted the Local Security Office (LSO) to conduct a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the Individual in October 2011. Ex. 5. After conducting the October 2011 PSI with the Individual, the LSO informed the Individual in a November 2011 notification letter (Notification Letter) that derogatory information existed that raised security concerns under 10

291

TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor who has held a security clearance for several years. During a routine reinvestigation, the local security office (LSO) discovered that the individual had not filed federal taxes for the tax years 2008 and 2009. In July 2011, the LSO interviewed the individual during a Personnel Security Interview (PSI), but that interview did not resolve the security concerns. The LSO suspended his clearance and, in August 2011, the LSO informed the individual that it had received derogatory information that created a doubt regarding his continued eligibility for access authorization. See

292

TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, and was granted a security clearance in connection with that employment. During the process of applying for a higherlevel security clearance, the individual provided information to the DOE that is inconsistent with information that he previously provided. Because these inconsistencies raised security concerns, the local security office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview with a personnel security specialist in March 2011. After this Personnel Security Interview (PSI), the LSO referred the individual to a local psychiatrist (hereinafter referred to as "the DOE

293

PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing In September 2011, the Individual, a security clearance holder, was arrested for Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) and subsequently reported the arrest to the Local Security Office (LSO) at the DOE Facility where he worked. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 19. Neither a September 2011 personnel security interview (PSI) nor a DOE-Contractor Psychologist's (DOE Psychologist) examination and evaluative report of the Individual resolved the security concerns raised by his 2011 DWI arrest. Consequently, the LSO informed the Individual, in a January 2011 notification letter (Notification Letter), that derogatory information existed which raised security concerns under 10

294

TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual held a security clearance from 1990 until 2002 while working for government contractors and the federal government. In 2010, his present employer, a DOE contractor, requested DOE access authorization for the individual. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview with the individual in September 2010 (the 2010 PSI, DOE Ex. 10). In November 2010, a DOE-consultant Psychiatrist evaluated the individual, and memorialized her findings in a Report of Psychiatric Evaluation (the 2010 Report, DOE Ex. 4). In December 2010, the LSO issued a Notification Letter

295

PSH-11-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 13 at 2. In June 2011, the Individual was cited for Disorderly and Lewd/Immoral Indecent Conduct (Disorderly Conduct). Ex. 9 at 2; Ex. 8 at 1. This disclosure prompted the Local Security Office to conduct a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the Individual in July 2011 (07/2011 PSI). Ex. 14. After the PSI, the LSO referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychologist ("the DOE Psychologist") for an evaluation. The DOE Psychologist evaluated the Individual in August 2011 and issued an evaluative report concerning the

296

PSH-11-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. On September 8, 2011, the individual notified the DOE that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) began garnishing his wages in August 2011, due to his failure to file a 2006 federal tax return. Exhibit 7. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on September 28, 2011. Exhibit 7. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns and the reasons for

297

PSH-12-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The administrative review proceeding began with the issuance of a Notification Letter to the Individual. See 10 C.F.R. § 710.21. The letter informed the Individual that information in the possession of the DOE created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for a security clearance. Specifically, the Local Security Office (LSO) stated that the Individual had: (1) been diagnosed by a psychologist as suffering from Impulse-Control Disorder, an illness or mental condition of a nature which causes, or may cause, a significant defect in judgment or reliability; and (2) engaged in unusual conduct which brought his honesty, trustworthiness, and reliability into question by viewing pornography at work, providing

298

EV-Everywhere Wants to Hear from All of You! | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EV-Everywhere Wants to Hear from All of You! EV-Everywhere Wants to Hear from All of You! EV-Everywhere Wants to Hear from All of You! September 19, 2012 - 2:59pm Addthis As part of the EV-Everywhere Grand Challenge, we held a series of workshops to lay out the initiative. The most recent one in Washington, DC, explored ways to reduce energy consumption with improved vehicle design. | Photo courtesy of Roy Feldman. As part of the EV-Everywhere Grand Challenge, we held a series of workshops to lay out the initiative. The most recent one in Washington, DC, explored ways to reduce energy consumption with improved vehicle design. | Photo courtesy of Roy Feldman. David Danielson David Danielson Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy How can I participate? We want your ideas on defining what makes an EV affordable for the

299

PSH-12-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility. Exhibit (Ex.) 10 at 3. The Local Security Office (LSO) discovered that the Individual failed to list a 2004 Driving Under the Influence (DUI) arrest in a Questionnaire for National Security Positions form completed in October 2011. Ex. 10 at 10. The Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview with the Individual in January 2012 (2012 PSI) and, due to concerns arising from the Individual's admission of excessive alcohol use in the 2012 PSI, referred him for an examination by a DOE-contractor psychologist (DOE Psychologist). Ex. 12; Ex. 8 at 1. Because neither the

300

U.S. Distillate Market Testimony for New York Assembly Hearing  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Market Testimony for New York Assembly Hearing Market Testimony for New York Assembly Hearing 2/4/2000 Click here to start Table of Contents U.S. Distillate Market Testimony for New York Assembly Hearing U.S. Residential Heating Oil Prices Regional Residential Heating Oil Prices Selected State Residential Heating Oil Prices Spot Distillate & Crude Oil Prices (Prices thru Jan 31, 2000) Low Distillate Stocks Set Stage for Price Volatility PADD 1 (East Coast) Heating Oil Stocks Low New England & Mid-Atlantic Weekly Total Distillate Stocks Low World Crude Production Not Keeping Pace with Demand OECD Stocks Reflect S/D Imbalance Distillate Stocks Are Important Part of Northeast Winter Supply Distillate Problem Likely to be Resolved Soon, But Recurrence Possible East Coast Distillate Production

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

PSH-12-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a DOE contractor, and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. In late September 2011, the individual was arrested and charged with Careless Driving and with Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated (Aggravated DWI). DOE Ex. 6. When he reported these charges to his Local Security Office (LSO), the LSO conducted a Personnel Security Interview (2011 PSI) with the individual in October 2011. 2011 PSI, DOE Ex. 9. In November 2011, a DOE-consultant psychiatrist evaluated the individual, and memorialized his findings in a Report of Psychiatric Examination (the Report, DOE Ex. 4). PSH-12-0008.pdf More Documents & Publications

302

TSO-1103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual was hired by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor in 2009, and was granted a security clearance at the request of his employer. In September 2010, the individual was arrested for misdemeanor child abuse. In October 2010, the LSO conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the individual, but that interview did not resolve the security concerns. The LSO suspended the individual's clearance in February 2011, and the LSO informed the individual that it had received derogatory information that had created a doubt regarding his eligibility for access authorization. See Notification Letter (June 2011). The Notification Letter stated that the derogatory information regarding the individual falls

303

PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing In September 2011, the Individual, a security clearance holder, was arrested for Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) and subsequently reported the arrest to the Local Security Office (LSO) at the DOE Facility where he worked. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 19. Neither a September 2011 personnel security interview (PSI) nor a DOE-Contractor Psychologist's (DOE Psychologist) examination and evaluative report of the Individual resolved the security concerns raised by his 2011 DWI arrest. Consequently, the LSO informed the Individual, in a January 2011 notification letter (Notification Letter), that derogatory information existed which raised security concerns under 10

304

PSH-11-0034 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

34 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 34 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0034 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. DOE Ex. 3. In August 2011, the Individual timely reported to the Local Security Office (LSO) her arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of alcohol. DOE Ex. 10. The incident prompted a September 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Ex. 11. After the PSI, the LSO referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE psychiatrist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist evaluated the Individual in October 2011 and issued a report. DOE Ex. 8. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the Individual in a November 2011 Notification Letter that there

305

PSH-12-0058 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

58 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 58 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0058 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a DOE contractor in a position that requires him to hold a DOE security clearance. For more than seven years, the individual has experienced financial difficulties, which resulted in the Local Security Office (LSO) conducting three personnel security interviews with him. In March 2012, the LSO sent a letter (Notification Letter) to the individual advising him that it possessed reliable information that created a substantial doubt regarding his eligibility to hold a security clearance. In an attachment to the Notification Letter, the LSO explained that the derogatory information fell within the purview of one potentially

306

LGPO - Feb 12th Hearing Bingaman - OMB 02 11 09  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

focusing on coal to liquids, petcoke to liquids, petcoke to synthetic natural gas (SNG) and coal to SNG. Part II application submissions are due March 23, 2009. In the...

307

Evaluation of a new digital als system for use in classrooms of children with hearing disabilities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The authors have studied and developed a proprietary digitally modulated Assistive Listening System (ALS)[1,2]. The system was designed to be used in a classroom for the hearing impaired students, as it was intended to be a low cost alternative to an ... Keywords: ALS, RF, assistive technology, wireless

Setha Pan-ngum, Pasin Israsena, Pakawat Dubsok

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

California's Salmon Crisis Hearing Before the California Assembly Committee on Water, Parks and Wildlife  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 California's Salmon Crisis Hearing Before the California Assembly Committee on Water, Parks colleagues have clearly demonstrated, there is a salmon crisis in California. This crisis is not new. As early as 1983, the California Legislature directed that an advisory committee look into salmon

Kammen, Daniel M.

309

In-air and underwater hearing sensitivity of a northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In-air and underwater hearing sensitivity of a northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris) D. Kastak and R.J. Schusterman Abstract: In-air and underwater sound detection thresholds were obtainedPa). The upper frequency limit in air was approximately 20 kHz. The underwater audiogram is similar to those

Reichmuth, Colleen

310

TEE-0021, TEA-004, TEA-006, TEA-007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 7, 2005 September 7, 2005 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Appeals Names of Cases: York International Corp. Carrier Corporation Lennox International, Inc. Dates of Filing: April 26, 2005 May 16, 2005 June 20, 2005 Case Nos.: TEE-0021 TEA-0004 TEA-0006 TEA-0007 On April 14, 2005, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE) granted exception relief to Nordyne, Inc. See Nordyne, Inc., 29 DOE ¶ 81,004 (2005) (Nordyne). The exception concerned split system central air conditioners and heat pumps having three to five ton cooling capacities and sold for use in manufactured housing. Under the terms of relief, Nordyne would have a four-year extension of

311

Public Hearing, DOE Release of DUF6 Conversion Facility Draft Environmental Impact Statements  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 2 PUBLIC HEARING 3 4 SUBJECT: DOE Release of DUF6 Conversion 5 Facility Draft Environmental Impact Statements 6 DATE: January 13, 2004 7 LOCATION: Department of Energy 8 Environmental Information Center 115 Memorial Drive 9 Paducah, Kentucky 42001 10 TIME: 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. 11 FACILITATOR: Darryl Armstrong 12 REPORTED BY: Amy S. Caronongan, RPR, CSR 13 14 15 16 17

312

Investigation of plasma-dust structures in He-Ar gas mixture  

SciTech Connect

The paper reports on the first experiments with plasma-dust formations in dc gas discharge plasma for a He-Ar mixture. It is shown that the choice of light and heavy gases for the mixture suppresses ion heating in electric field under the conventional conditions of experiments and results in a supersonic jet with high Mach numbers. Distribution functions for drifting ions in the gas mixture are calculated for various mixture concentrations, electric field strengths, and gas pressures.

Maiorov, S. A. [A.M. Prokhorov General Physics Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (Russian Federation); Ramazanov, T. S.; Dzhumagulova, K. N.; Jumabekov, A. N.; Dosbolayev, M. K. [Al Farabi Kazakh National University, IETP, Tole bi 96a, Almaty, 050012 (Kazakhstan)

2008-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

313

A second field investigation of noise reduction afforded by insert-type hearing protectors  

SciTech Connect

Field testing of noise reduction by earplugs was done. Ten factories and 280 employees took 1400 attenuation tests. User molded, expandable acoustic foam, custom molded, and acoustic wool types of earplugs were evaluated. Workers received protection ranging from about 9 decibels at 125 hertz to 29 decibels at 3150 hertz. Acoustic foam earplugs provided the best hearing protection, and acoustical wool, the least. The authors conclude actual noise protection depends on earplug design.

Edwards, R.G.; Broderson, A.B.; Green, W.W.; Lempert, B.L.

1982-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

314

VBB-0021 - In the Matter of Eugene J. Dreger | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21 - In the Matter of Eugene J. Dreger 21 - In the Matter of Eugene J. Dreger VBB-0021 - In the Matter of Eugene J. Dreger This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) on June 27, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise the OHA appeal decision only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filings in this case, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in this case. No modification to the OHA appeal decision is therefore

315

Whistleblower Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 4, 2000 October 4, 2000 VBB-0005 - In the Matter of Thomas Dwyer This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on July 24, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). October 2, 2000 VBA-0055 - In the Matter of Lucy Smith This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on July 11, 2000, involving a Complaint filed by Lucy Smith (Smith or the Complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor

316

VBB-0041 - In the Matter of John L. Gretencord | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 - In the Matter of John L. Gretencord 1 - In the Matter of John L. Gretencord VBB-0041 - In the Matter of John L. Gretencord This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on March 13, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filing dated April 27, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in this case. No modification to the appeal decision by the OHA Director is

317

VBB-0038 - In the Matter of Ann Johndro-Collins | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 - In the Matter of Ann Johndro-Collins 8 - In the Matter of Ann Johndro-Collins VBB-0038 - In the Matter of Ann Johndro-Collins This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on March 28, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filing dated May 16, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in this case. No modification to the appeal decision by the OHA Director is

318

FIA-12-0020 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District 20 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance FIA-12-0020 - In the Matter of California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance The Office of Hearings and Appeals granted a Motion for Reconsideration of part of a Decision we issued on March 23, 2012, relating to appeals filed by California-Arizona-Nevada District Organization Contract Compliance (CANDO) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). In its Appeals, CANDO challenged the Loan Guarantee Program Office's (LGPO) application of Exemption 4 of the FOIA to withhold the names and other identifying information about contractors and sub-contractors listed in documents responsive to its request. With respect to the CANDO's appeal concerning

319

VBB-0005 - In the Matter of Thomas Dwyer | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

05 - In the Matter of Thomas Dwyer 05 - In the Matter of Thomas Dwyer VBB-0005 - In the Matter of Thomas Dwyer This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on July 24, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filing dated September 8, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in this case. No modification to the appeal decision by the OHA Director is

320

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61 - 3270 of 26,777 results. 61 - 3270 of 26,777 results. Download VEE-0027- In the Matter of J. Enterprises, Inc. On June 11, 1996, J. Enterprises, Inc. (Enterprises) of Swansea, Massachusetts, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE).... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0027-matter-j-enterprises-inc Download VEE-0059- In the Matter of XXXX Oil Co., Inc. On April 26, 1999, XXXXXXXXXX Oil Co., Inc. (XXXXXXXXXX) of XXXXXXXXXX, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application,... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0059-matter-xxxx-oil-co-inc Download TEE-0061- In the Matter of Kirby Oil Company, Inc. On June 16, 2009, Kirby Oil Company, Inc. (Kirby Oil) filed an Application

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/ves0071.htm  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VES-0071 VES-0071 May 23, 2000 DECISION AND ORDER OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Stay Petitioner: Mississippi Power Company Date of Filing:May 1, 2000 Case Number:VES-0071 On May 1, 2000, the Mississippi Power Company, of Gulfport, Mississippi (Mississippi Power), filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy an Application for Exception and an Application for Stay pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Part 1003. The first request seeks "an exception to the EIA (Energy Information Administration) policy of public disclosure of certain EIA Form 861 (Annual Electric Utility Report for the Reporting Period 1999) material which the Company deems confidential and proprietary commercial and financial information.(1) Application for Stay at 1. The material at issue is

322

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 9, 1997 May 9, 1997 VEE-0037 - In the Matter of W. Gordon Smith Company On December 24, 1996, the W. Gordon Smith Company (Smith), filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its Application, Smith requests that it be temporarily relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be granted. April 9, 1997 VEE-0042 - In the Matter of Edris Oil Service, Inc. On March 5, 1997, Edris Oil Service, Inc. (Edris) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department

323

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 19, 1996 July 19, 1996 VEE-0030 - In the Matter of Lee Oil Company On July 19, 1996, Lee Oil Company (Lee), located in Greensboro, North Carolina, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Lee requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be granted. April 16, 1996 VEE-0021 - In the Matter of Jacobs Oil Company On August 16, 1996 Jacobs Oil Company (Jacobs) of Dysart, Pennsylvania filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals

324

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 1, 1999 December 1, 1999 VEE-0060 - In the Matter of Blakeman Propane, Inc. On May 11, 1999, Blakeman Propane, Inc. (Blakeman) of Moorcroft, Wyoming, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Blakeman requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. October 20, 1999 VEE-0059 - In the Matter of XXXX Oil Co., Inc. On April 26, 1999, XXXXXXXXXX Oil Co., Inc. (XXXXXXXXXX) of XXXXXXXXXX, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals

325

WBU-13-0014- In the Matter of Earl M. Ballard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On September 30, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting Mr. Earl Ballards Appeal of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Offices (PPPO) dismissal of his whistleblower...

326

WBU-13-0013- In the Matter of Sabine Lauer  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On September 19, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying Ms. Sabine Lauers Appeal of the NNSAs dismissal of her whistleblower complaint for lack of jurisdiction....

327

FIA-12-0019- In the Matter of Mark D. Siciliano  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Director granted in part and denied in all other respects a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Appeal filed by Mark D. Siciliano (Appellant).

328

FIA-12-0050 - In the Matter of Cause of Action | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

50 - In the Matter of Cause of Action FIA-12-0050 - In the Matter of Cause of Action On October 4, 2012, The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) granted an Appeal filed by Cause...

329

FIA-12-0008- In the Matter of Carter & Burgess, Inc.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Director granted in part and denied in all other respects a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Appeal filed by Carter & Burgess, Inc., (Appellant).

330

TFC-0007 - In the Matter of Jeffrey T. Richelson  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On February , 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a decision regarding an Appeal filed by Jeffrey T. Richelson from a determination issued by the National Nuclear Security...

331

FIA-13-0015- In the Matter of Cause of Action  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On April 24, 2013, the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) granted in part a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Appeal filed by the Cause of Action (Appellant) of a...

332

WBU-13-0005 - In the Matter of Sun Kim | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

05 - In the Matter of Sun Kim WBU-13-0005 - In the Matter of Sun Kim On April 8, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying Ms. Sun Kim's Appeal of...

333

WBU-13-0003- In the Matter of Cassondra B. Stark  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On March 27, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting in part and denying in part Ms. Starkss Appeal of the DOEs Richland Operations Offices (RL) Employee...

334

tee0070.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

23, 2010 23, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: BSH Home Appliances Corporation Date of Filing: March 30, 2010 Case No.: TEE-0070 On March 30, 2010, BSH Home Appliances Corporation (BSH) filed an Application for Exception (Application) with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests temporary relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430, Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers and Freezers (Refrigerator Efficiency Standards). In its exception request, BSH asserts that the firm will suffer an undue hardship and inequity if required to adhere to the Refrigerator Efficiency Standards, codified at 10 C.F.R. § 430.32. If

335

Microsoft Word - 0068.TEE.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2010 4, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Case Name: Bowlin Travel Centers, Inc. Filing Date: March 10, 2010 Case No.: TEE-0068 Bowlin Travel Centers, Inc., filed an Application for Exception with the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). The firm requests permanent relief from its requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the Application should be denied. I. Background In the 1970's, Congress's lack of information about petroleum products impeded our nation's response to the oil crises.

336

http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/eia/vee0076.htm  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 June 28, 2002 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Green Mountain Energy Company Date of Filing: August 23, 2000 Case Number: VEE-0076 On August 23, 2000, the Green Mountain Energy Company (Green Mountain) of Austin, Texas, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Green Mountain requests an exception, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 1003, which, if granted, would have the effect of withholding from public release - either through regular publication by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) or through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552 -- data which the firm files with the DOE Energy Information Administration on Forms EIA-826 and EIA- 861.

337

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

701 - 17710 of 26,764 results. 701 - 17710 of 26,764 results. Download VEE-0030- In the Matter of Lee Oil Company On July 19, 1996, Lee Oil Company (Lee), located in Greensboro, North Carolina, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy. In its... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0030-matter-lee-oil-company Download VEE-0032- In the Matter of Thomas Oil Company On September 13, 1996, Thomas Oil Company (Thomas Oil) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Thomas... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0032-matter-thomas-oil-company Download VEE-0043- In the Matter of Greenville Automatic Gas Company On March 11, 1997, Greenville Automatic Gas Company (Greenville) filed an

338

Energy and water development appropriations for fiscal year 1980. Hearings of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Ninety-Sixth Congress, First Session, H. R. 4388. Part 5  

SciTech Connect

These budget hearings encompass atomic energy defense activity, the Office of Energy Research, and nonnuclear energy technologies. (PSB)

1979-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

339

Annual Reports | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Reports Annual Reports Annual Reports OHA Annual Reports Available for Download January 1, 2013 OHA 2012 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2011 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). Here are highlights for the past year: September 30, 2011 OHA 2011 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2011 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) September 30, 2010 OHA 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2010 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) September 8, 2009 OHA 2009 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2009 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) September 30, 2008 OHA 2008 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2008 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) September 30, 2007 OHA 2007 ANNUAL REPORT Report on the FY 2007 operations of the Office of Hearings and Appeals

340

Fast communication: Joint design of Gaussianized spectrum-based features and least-square linear classifier for automatic acoustic environment classification in hearing aids  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper we propose a method to generate a novel set of features in order to improve sound classification in digital hearing aids. The approach is based on the fact that those classification algorithms whose design consists in minimizing the mean ... Keywords: Audio signals, Digital hearing aids, Feature extraction, Sound classification, Spectrum Gaussianization

Lucas Cuadra; Roberto Gil-Pita; Enrique Alexandre; Manuel Rosa-Zurera

2010-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Energy and water development appropriations for Fiscal Year 1984. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Ninety-Eighth Congress, First Session  

SciTech Connect

Part I of the 1984 appropriations hearing record covers four days of hearings reviewing the programs and activities of the Corps of Engineers Civil Works, Department of Interior and Bureau of Reclamation, Tennessee Valley Authority, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Spokesmen for each agency explained their budget needs and responded to questions from the committee. (DCK)

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

Energy and water development appropriations for 1994. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session. Part 5  

SciTech Connect

Part 5 of the hearings for the Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1994 contains budget hearings for the Department of Energy. Contained in this volume is the statement of the Secretary of Energy and budget proposals and justifications for Departmental Administration, Energy Research, Nuclear Energy and Commercial Waste Management, Solar and Renewables, and Power Marketing Administrations.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

343

Final_Testimony_7-29-2010_Hearing_Sonya_Baskerville.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sonya Baskerville Sonya Baskerville Manager of National Relations Bonneville Power Administration Before The United States House of Representatives Subcommittee on Water & Power Committee on Natural Resources Hearing On Investment in Small Hydropower: Prospects of Expanding Low-Impact and Affordable Hydropower Generation in the West July 29, 2010 1 Good morning, Madame Chairwoman. My name is Sonya Baskerville and I am the Manager for National Relations for the Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville). Bonneville is a Federal power marketing administration based in Portland, Oregon. I am pleased to appear today to describe how Bonneville works with its partner Federal agencies - the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation - to

344

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41 - 1150 of 26,777 results. 41 - 1150 of 26,777 results. Download FIA-13-0021- In the Matter of Caldera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. On April 10, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy's... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0021-matter-caldera-pharmaceuticals-inc Download 30-Day Federal Register Notice- Extension http://energy.gov/cio/downloads/30-day-federal-register-notice-extension Download Application to Export Electric Energy OE Docket No. EA-258-D Brookfield Energy Marketing Inc.: Federal Register Notice, Volume 78. No. 213- Nov. 4, 2013 Application from Brookfield Energy to export electric energy to Canada. Federal Register Notice. http://energy.gov/oe/downloads/application-export-electric-energy-oe-docket-no-ea-258-d-brookfield-energy-marketing

345

Heat extraction and refrigeration (HEAR) system. Phase I final progress report. [Restaurant kitchens  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Testing indicates that heat energy available to be recaptured grossly exceeds the capacity of the 1.5 ton medium temperature Freon 12 compressor being utilized. The unit produced 50 pounds of suction pressure with the damper (Figure 4) open and exceeded compressor operational limits with the damper closed. This indicates that the current compressor could be replaced by one of 5 ton capacity since current estimates indicate that 60,000 Btu's are available for recovery. This could be divided between space heating and water heating as required by using separate condensers. There were no real surprises in the feasibility model construction and test phase, and the validity of the assumptions made in the original project description have been established. That is, it has been demonstrated that it is feasible to extract heat from the kitchen exhaust duct in a restaurant and keep the heat pump evaporator clean. It is concluded that work done under this $10,000 grant demonstrated the technical feasibility of the HEAR System. However, additional funding (our original proposal called for a $47,000 grant) would be required to economically evaluate the benefit realized and to advance the HEAR System design to a workable prototype stage.

Venable, B.M.

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

P:\\DECISION\\psh-11-0024.wpd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security ) Filing Date:...

347

Microsoft Word - o243.1Update1-13-11  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Environmental Management Office of Fossil Energy Office of General Counsel Office of Hearings and Appeals Office of Inspector...

348

U  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Environmental Management Office of Fossil Energy Office of General Counsel Office of Hearings and Appeals Office of the...

349

Environmental Management Commission (Alabama)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Alabama Department of Environmental Management is charged with developing the state's environmental policy, hearing administrative appeals of permits, administrative orders and variances issued...

350

DOE Office of Science - Chicago Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Records Privacy Act Notices DOE Freedom of InformationPrivacy Act Division DOE Office of Hearings & Appeals DOJ Freedom of Information Act DOJ Office of Information and...

351

Privacy Act Links to Relates Sites | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

on individuals and rules agencies follow to assist individuals who request information about their records. DOE Office of Hearings and Appeals. The Department of Justice...

352

Kathleen Binder  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Kathleen Binder serves as the Director of the Office of Conflict Prevention and Resolution (OCPR) in the Office of Hearings and Appeals. OCPR is responsible for providing consultation,...

353

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE's Federal Energy Technology Center ("FETC"), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals...

354

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41 - 3950 of 28,560 results. 41 - 3950 of 28,560 results. Download TEE-0067- In the Matter of North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. On December 2, 2009, North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. (North Side) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0067-matter-north-side-coal-oil-co-inc Download VES-0071- In the Matter of Mississippi Power Company On May 1, 2000, the Mississippi Power Company, of Gulfport, Mississippi (Mississippi Power), filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy an Application for... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/ves-0071-matter-mississippi-power-company Download VEE-0044- In the Matter of Public Service Electric and Gas Company

355

Microsoft Word - 0067.TEE.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 17, 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. Date of Filing: December 2, 2009 Case No.: TEE-0067 On December 2, 2009, North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. (North Side) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the request should be denied. 1 I. Background The DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) is authorized to collect, analyze, and

356

Microsoft Word - 0060.tee.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 30, 2009 June 30, 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: 7 Oil Co., Inc. Date of Filing: June 11, 2009 Case No.: TEE-0060 On June 11, 2009, 7 Oil Co., Inc. (7 Oil) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the request should be denied. 1 I. Background The DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) is authorized to collect, analyze, and

357

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61 - 7470 of 29,416 results. 61 - 7470 of 29,416 results. Download TEE-0071- In the Matter of Monroe Oil Company On May 26, 2010, Monroe Oil Company (Monroe) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0071-matter-monroe-oil-company Download TEE-0061- In the Matter of Kirby Oil Company, Inc. On June 16, 2009, Kirby Oil Company, Inc. (Kirby Oil) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0061-matter-kirby-oil-company-inc Download CX-007506: Categorical Exclusion Determination Record of Categorical Exclusion for Bryan Mound Building BE-2 Drainage

358

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41 - 3250 of 26,777 results. 41 - 3250 of 26,777 results. Download VEE-0020- In the Matter of Mercury Fuel Service, Inc. On April 9, 1996, Mercury Fuel Service, Inc. (Mercury) of Waterbury, Connecticut, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE).... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0020-matter-mercury-fuel-service-inc Download VEE-0028- In the Matter of Laney Oil Company, Inc. On June 18, 1996, the Laney Oil Company, Inc., (Laney Oil) of Monroe, North Carolina, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0028-matter-laney-oil-company-inc Download VEE-0040- In the Matter of Western Star Propane, Inc. On February 18, 1997, Western Star Propane, Inc. (Western) filed an

359

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 15, 2010 November 15, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: B&B Marine, Inc. Date of Filing: October 15, 2010 Case No.: TEE-0072 On October 15, 2010, B&B Marine, Inc. (B&B) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the request should be denied. 1 I. Background The DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) is authorized to collect, analyze, and disseminate energy data and other information. 15 U.S.C. § 772(b); 42 U.S.C. § 7135(b). The

360

P:\DECISION\0071.tee.wpd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OHA Exception Decisions issued since July 5, 1995, are available on the OHA website OHA Exception Decisions issued since July 5, 1995, are available on the OHA website located at http://www.oha.doe.gov. The text of a cited decision may be accessed by entering the case number of the decision in the search engine located at http://www.oha.doe.gov/search.htm. June 11, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Monroe Oil Company Date of Filing: May 26, 2010 Case Number: TEE-0071 On May 26, 2010, Monroe Oil Company (Monroe) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

P:\DECISION\0059.tee.wpd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 U.S.C. § 772(b); 42 U.S.C. § 7135(b). 5 U.S.C. § 772(b); 42 U.S.C. § 7135(b). 2 See H.R. Rep. No. 373, 96th Cong., 1st Sess., reprinted in 1979 U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 1764, 1781 (H.R. Report 373). May 15, 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Sauder Fuel Inc. Date of Filing: April 28, 2009 Case No.: TEE-0059 On April 28, 2009, Sauder Fuel Inc. (Sauder), filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained

362

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51 - 22460 of 26,764 results. 51 - 22460 of 26,764 results. Download VEE-0018- In the Matter of Lakes Gas Company On March 12, 1996, the Lakes Gas Company (Lakes) of Forest Lake, Minnesota, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0018-matter-lakes-gas-company Download VEE-0033- In the Matter of Nugent Motor Company On October 16, 1996, Nugent Motor company (Nugent) of Colebrook, New Hampshire, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0033-matter-nugent-motor-company Download VEE-0036- In the Matter of Kalamazoo Oil Co. On November 26, 1996, Kalamazoo Oil Co. (Kalamazoo), of Kalamazoo,

363

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIA Cases EIA Cases EIA Cases RSS February 14, 2011 TEE-0073 - In the Matter of Cole Distributing, Inc. On December 13, 2010, Cole Distributing, Inc. (Cole) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that Cole's request should be denied. February 14, 2011 TEE-0076 - In the Matter of Brodeur's Oil Service, Inc. On February 18, 2011, Brodeur's Oil Service, Inc. (Brodeur's) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of

364

Microsoft Word - 0073.tee.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 14, 2011 February 14, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Cole Distributing, Inc. Date of Filing: December 13, 2010 Case No.: TEE-0073 On December 13, 2010, Cole Distributing, Inc. (Cole) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that Cole's request should be denied. 1 I. Background The DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) is authorized to collect, analyze, and

365

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41 - 3050 of 28,905 results. 41 - 3050 of 28,905 results. Download VEE-0013- In the Matter of O'Brian Oil Company On July 18, 1994 and November 22, 1995, O'Brian Oil Company (O'Brian) of Shellsburg, Iowa, filed Applications for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0013-matter-obrian-oil-company Download TEE-0072- In the Matter of B&B Marine, Inc. On October 15, 2010, B&B Marine, Inc. (B&B) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0072-matter-bb-marine-inc Download VEE-0018- In the Matter of Lakes Gas Company On March 12, 1996, the Lakes Gas Company (Lakes) of Forest Lake, Minnesota,

366

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

71 - 680 of 28,905 results. 71 - 680 of 28,905 results. Download Coordinating Interstate ElectricTransmission Siting: An Introduction to the Debate http://energy.gov/oe/downloads/coordinating-interstate-electrictransmission-siting-introduction-debate Download VEE-0027- In the Matter of J. Enterprises, Inc. On June 11, 1996, J. Enterprises, Inc. (Enterprises) of Swansea, Massachusetts, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE).... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0027-matter-j-enterprises-inc Download VEE-0060- In the Matter of Blakeman Propane, Inc. On May 11, 1999, Blakeman Propane, Inc. (Blakeman) of Moorcroft, Wyoming, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its...

367

Microsoft Word - 0069tee.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 5, 2010 April 5, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Severson Oil & LP Co., Inc. Date of Filing: March 23, 2010 Case No.: TEE-0069 On March 23, 2010, Severson Oil & LP Co., Inc. (Severson) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the request should be denied. I. Background The DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) is authorized to collect, analyze, and

368

Microsoft Word - 0076.tee.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

27, 2011 27, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Brodeur's Oil Service, Inc. Date of Filing: February 18, 2011 Case No.: TEE-0076 On February 18, 2011, Brodeur's Oil Service, Inc. (Brodeur's) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests temporary relief from its requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained below, we have determined that the firm's request should be denied. 1 I. Background The DOE's EIA is authorized to collect, analyze, and disseminate energy data and other

369

Transcript of Public Hearing on DUF6 Conversion Facility Draft EISs, Held Jan. 7, 2004, Waverly, Ohio  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- - - - - - Draft Environmental Impact Statements For the Construction and Operation of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facilities at the Paducah, Kentucky and Portsmouth, Ohio Sites - - - PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 7, 2004 - - - LOCATION: Pike County YMCA 400 Pride Drive Waverly, Ohio TIME: 6:00

370

The great adventure: a report on the 10 regional public hearings on solar energy for the domestic policy review  

SciTech Connect

The Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) was subcontracted by Franklin Institute to work with them in conducting the public hearings for the Domestic Policy Review of Solar Energy--a hearing in each of the ten regional areas of the U.S. In Section I, the ILSR report on the hearings is presented, and their major policy recommendations are (1) the Federal government should move aggressively from research to commercialization, marketing, and public education; (2) decentralization both in program process and in context should be pursued vigorously; (3) the government should emphasize small-scale systems, small businesses, individual inventors, community organizations, and small research groups in its funding programs; (4) solar-energy systems that are decentralist are preferred over the more central-oriented; (5) passive solar design was the major technology recommended throughout; (6) DOE must streamline its grants process and reduce paperwork that proposals require; (7) the major item required for a successful solar industry is rapid passage of the solar income tax credit, either within, or separate from, the National Energy Act; (8) low-interest loans and investment capital are required by small businesses; (9) public information on solar energy should be more available; (10) the budget for solar should be increased substantially; and (11) solar programs should be related to job-creation programs. Then, in Section II, the Franklin Institute Research Laboratories report on the public hearings, including panel discussions is presented.

1978-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

VWD-0007- In the Matter of Linda D. Gass  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This determination will consider a Motion for Discovery filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) by Linda D. Gass. This Motion, dated August 10, 1999, concerns the hearing requested by...

372

Drilling for geothermal resources: rules and regulations and minimum well construction standards  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The following geothermal rules and regulations are presented: authority; policy; definitions; drilling; records; blow out prevention; injection wells; abandonment; maintenance; hearings; notice procedures; hearings on refused, limited, or conditioned permit; appeals; penalties; and forms;

Not Available

1978-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1995. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee of the Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, Second Session, Part 5  

SciTech Connect

Testimony in this volume of hearings for 1995 energy and water development appropriations involve the following: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; Nuclear Regulatory Commission; Secretary of Energy; Departmental Administration; Energy Research; Solar, Renewables, and Nuclear Energy; Commercial Waste Management.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

Energy and water development appropriations for 1993. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, Second Session, Part 8  

SciTech Connect

This document contains part 8 of the hearings on Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1993. Part 8 documents the testimony of members of Congress and other interested individuals and organizations. A list of witnesses is provided following the testimony.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

375

Energy and water development appropriations for 1994. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session, Part 4  

SciTech Connect

The hearing of the House subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations addressed the Energy and Water Development appropriations for the Department of Energy (DOE) in 1994. The document contains the Congressional Budget request of DOE for Atomic Energy Defense Activities.

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

376

Microsoft Word - 1116.tso.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: September 23, 2011 ) ) Case No.: TSO-1116 ) ___________________________________ ) Issued: March 23, 2012 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Valerie Vance Adeyeye, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual@) to hold an access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10

377

HTS applications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Superconductivity has found many attractive applications in medicine, science, power systems, engineering, transport and electronics. One of the most prominent applications of superconductivity are superconducting magnets e.g. MRI magnets, NMR magnets, accelerator magnets, and magnets for fusion; most applications still use low temperature superconductors. Since the discovery of high temperature superconductivity (HTS) in 1986 there has been a tremendous progress in R&D of HTS material, wires and applications. Especially for power system applications, HTS offers considerable economic benefits. Many HTS demonstrator or prototype applications have been built and successfully tested, and some HTS applications like cables and superconducting fault current limiters seem very close to commercialisation. This paper gives an overview about the present and future HTS applications in power applications, high field magnets and current leads. In addition results of the Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe program to develop H...

Noe, M; Fietz, W H; Goldacker, W; Schneider, Th

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

378

DOE's Program Regulating Liquefied Natural Gas Export Applications |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Regulating Liquefied Natural Gas Export Applications Program Regulating Liquefied Natural Gas Export Applications DOE's Program Regulating Liquefied Natural Gas Export Applications March 19, 2013 - 2:52pm Addthis Statement of Christopher Smith, Acting Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care, and Entitlements View the archived Congressional Hearing on YouTube Thank you Chairman Lankford, Ranking Member Speier, and members of the Committee; I appreciate the opportunity to be here today to discuss the Department of Energy's (DOE) program regulating the export of natural gas, including liquefied natural gas (LNG). Recent Developments in LNG Exports The boom in domestic shale gas provides unprecedented opportunities for the

379

VBB-0010 - In the Matter of David D. Powell, Jr. | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VBB-0010 - In the Matter of David D. Powell, Jr. VBB-0010 - In the Matter of David D. Powell, Jr. VBB-0010 - In the Matter of David D. Powell, Jr. This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal submitted by Dr. Jagdish Laul to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued in that case on March 9, 2001. You submitte~ a Statement of Issues to be reviewed (Statement) on June 11, 2001. On July 10, 2001, Ms. Alene Anderson submitted a Response to your Statement on behalf of Dr. Laul. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). As discusoed below, you have not shown that extraordinary

380

Petition for Secretarial Review (Dismissed July 19, 2001)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

JUL 19 2001 JUL 19 2001 Mr. David D. Powell, Jr. Holland and Hart P.O. Box 8749 Denver, CO 80201-8749 Re: OHA Case No. VBB-0010 Dear Mr. Powell: This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal submitted by Dr. Jagdish Laul to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued in that case on March 9, 2001. You submitte~ a Statement of Issues to be reviewed (Statement) on June 11, 2001. On July 10, 2001, Ms. Alene Anderson submitted a Response to your Statement on behalf of Dr. Laul. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). As discusoed

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Petition for Secretarial Review (Dismissed August 21, 2000)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ann Johndro-Collins Ann Johndro-Collins 1509 Amon Drive Richland, WA 99352 Dear Ms. Johndro-Collins: AUG 21 2000 Re: OHA Case No. VBB-0038 This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on March 28, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filing dated May 16, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in

382

Petition for Secretarial Review (Dismissed October 17, 2000)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Eugene J. Dreger Eugene J. Dreger P.O. Box 27050 Las Vegas, NV 89126-1050 Dear Mr. Dreger: OCT 1 7 2000 Re: OHA Case No. VBB-0021 This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) on June 27, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise the OHA appeal decision only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filings in this case, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in

383

FIA-13-0017 - In the Matter of Partnership for Policy Integrity |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 - In the Matter of Partnership for Policy Integrity 7 - In the Matter of Partnership for Policy Integrity FIA-13-0017 - In the Matter of Partnership for Policy Integrity On March 28, 2013, The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) granted in part and denied in all other aspects an Appeal filed by Partnership for Policy Integrity (the Appellant) under the FOIA of two determinations issued by the DOE's Loan Guarantee Program Office (LGPO). PPI's request sought information concerning a loan guarantee application filed by a third party. On January 17, 2013, and on February 5, 2013, LGPO issued determination letters release a total of 80 documents to the Appellant. However, LGPO withheld portions of these documents under Exemptions 4 and 6. thes Appeal contended that LGPO's withholdings from six specific documents under

384

VBB-0037 - In the Matter of Gary Roybal | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VBB-0037 - In the Matter of Gary Roybal VBB-0037 - In the Matter of Gary Roybal VBB-0037 - In the Matter of Gary Roybal This letter concerns the complaint of retaliation that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on June 14, 2001. That decision dismissed your complaint of retaliation on the grounds that your complaint has been substantially resolved, and you have already received a remedy that is at least equivalsnt to what you could have received under the Part 708 regulations. 10 C.F.R. § 708.17(c) (5) and (6). The Part 708 regulations applicable to your petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10

385

Mr. Thomas Dwyer  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Thomas Dwyer Thomas Dwyer 5007 Clarevalley Drive Cincinnati, OH 45238 Dear Mr. Dwyer: Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 OCT -4 2000 Re: OHA Case No. VBB-0005 This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that you submitted to the Department of Energy under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on July 24, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filing dated September 8, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that

386

Gregory Kellam Scott, Esq.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Kellam Scott, Esq. Kellam Scott, Esq. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 SEP 2 9 2000 Vice President and General Counsel Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site 10808 Hwy. 93, Unit B Golden, CO 80403-8200 Dear Mr. Scott: Re: Case No. VBB-0033 This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that Ms. Barbara L. Nabb submitted to the D~partment of Energy under 10 C.P.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on April 5, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.P.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you

387

VBB-0033 - In the Matter of Gregory Kellam Scott, Esq. | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 - In the Matter of Gregory Kellam Scott, Esq. 3 - In the Matter of Gregory Kellam Scott, Esq. VBB-0033 - In the Matter of Gregory Kellam Scott, Esq. This letter concerns the complaint of reprisal that Ms. Barbara L. Nabb submitted to the D~partment of Energy under 10 C.P.R. Part 708. You have filed a petition for Secretarial review of the appeal decision issued to you on April 5, 2000. The Part 708 regulations applicable to the petition provide that the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals only under extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.P.R. § 708.35(d). After fully evaluating all the issues that you raised in your filings dated on July 3, 2000 and August 24, 2000, I have determined that you have not shown that extraordinary circumstances warranting Secretarial review exist in this case. No

388

PDF Application  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

?Computer Applications and Process Control. ?Copper Nickel and Cobalt ... ? Iron and Steel. ?Joining. ?Lead Zinc and Tin. ?Lightweight Materials.

389

We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon March 19, 2012 - 11:07am Addthis Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Erin R. Pierce Erin R. Pierce Digital Communications Specialist, Office of Public Affairs How can I participate? To join our live Q&A, visit twitter.com/energy on March 20 at 12 PM ET. Submit questions in advance by tweeting your question to @ENERGY using the #askENERGY hashtag. Have questions about our efforts to promote alternative fuels, advanced vehicles, and fuel efficiency? Then join us at 12PM ET on Tuesday, March

390

We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon March 19, 2012 - 11:07am Addthis Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Erin R. Pierce Erin R. Pierce Digital Communications Specialist, Office of Public Affairs How can I participate? To join our live Q&A, visit twitter.com/energy on March 20 at 12 PM ET. Submit questions in advance by tweeting your question to @ENERGY using the #askENERGY hashtag. Have questions about our efforts to promote alternative fuels, advanced vehicles, and fuel efficiency? Then join us at 12PM ET on Tuesday, March

391

Technologies Applications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

evaporation systems n Potential mining applications (produced water) nIndustry applications for which silicaLicensable Technologies Applications: n Cooling tower systems n Water treatment systems n Water needed n Decreases the amount of makeup water and subsequent discharged water (blowdown) n Enables

392

Acoustically Induced Streaming Flows near a Model Cod Otolith and their Potential Implications for Fish Hearing  

SciTech Connect

The ears of fishes are remarkable sensors for the small acoustic disturbances associated with underwater sound. For example, each ear of the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) has three dense bony bodies (otoliths) surrounded by fluid and tissue, and detects sounds at frequencies from 30 to 500 Hz. Atlantic cod have also been shown to localize sounds. However, how their ears perform these functions is not fully understood. Steady streaming, or time-independent, flows near a 350% scale model Atlantic cod otolith immersed in a viscous fluid were studied to determine if these fluid flows contain acoustically relevant information that could be detected by the ear s sensory hair cells. The otolith was oscillated sinusoidally at various orientations at frequencies of 8 24 Hz, corresponding to an actual frequency range of 280 830 Hz. Phaselocked particle pathline visualizations of the resulting flows give velocity, vorticity, and rate of strain fields over a single plane of this mainly two-dimensional flow. Although the streaming flows contain acoustically relevant information, the displacements due to these flows are likely too small to explain Atlantic cod hearing abilities near threshold. The results, however, may suggest a possible mechanism for detection of ultrasound in some fish species.

Kotas, Charlotte W [ORNL; Rogers, Peter [Georgia Institute of Technology; Yoda, Minami [Georgia Institute of Technology

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

the decision of the ReliabilityFirst Corporation (RFC) to include Holland Board of Public Works (Holland) on the NERC Compliance Registry as a Transmission Owner (TO) and Transmission Operator (TOP). Statement of Appeal  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

NERC Compliance Registry within the RFC Region for the functions of TO and TOP. Holland appeals its registration as a TO and TOP arguing that: (a) its facilities are operated as radial facilities and, therefore, fall under the exclusion of RFCs definition of bulk electric system (BES) facilities; 1 (b) its facilities are not material to the BES; (c) registration of its facilities will not improve BES reliability; (d) excluding its facilities from the registry will not result in a gap in BES reliability; and (e) compliance with TO and TOP standards presents a disproportionate and undue hardship on Holland. 2 Holland serves approximately 27,000 retail and commercial customers in Holland, Michigan, as well as portions of Holland, Park, Laketown, and Fillmore townships. 3 Holland owns and operates 24 miles of 138 kV transmission lines, seven generating units (ranging from 11.5 to 83 MW) and eight high voltage substations. 4 Holland has a total of 226 MW of internal generation. 5 Holland also owns shares in the J.H. Campbell Complex and the Belle River Plant which are operated by Consumers Energy and Detroit Edison, respectively. 6

unknown authors

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

394

FIA-12-0045 - In the Matter of National Security Archive  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energys Richland Operations Office (ROO). The National Security Archive, the Appellant, requested copies of a specific report dealing with a methodology for the production of plutonium from Departments Office of Information Resources (OIR).

395

PETSc: Applications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Applications and Publications Applications and Publications Home Download Features Documentation Applications/Publications Prizes Industrial/DOE sites DOE CSGF users Miscellaneous External Software Developers Site These are publications on application simulations developed by PETSc users. Please send us information about your publications, petsc-maint@mcs.anl.gov. How to cite PETSc in your publications. See Acknowledgments for software packages that PETSc uses. PETSc has been used for modeling in all of these areas: Acoustics, Aerodynamics, Air Pollution, Arterial Flow, Bone Fractures, Brain Surgery, Cancer Surgery, Cancer Treatment, Carbon Sequestration, Cardiology, Cells, CFD, Combustion, Concrete, Corrosion, Data Mining, Dentistry, Earth Quakes, Economics, Fission, Fusion, Glaciers, Ground Water Flow, Linguistics,

396

Application: Electronics  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Application: Electronics. ... Suppression of Electrical Cable Fires: Development of a Standard PVC Cable Fire Test for ISO 14520-1.. Robin, ML ...

2011-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

397

Application Form  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. The application ... Note: Applying for the travel award does not enter your abstract into the TMS Conference Management System.

398

brochure application  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Magnetohydrodynamics. 19. Measurement Techniques for Pot Analysis ... Country ... Be sure to note your personal topics of interest on the application because...

399

About Us | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

About Us About Us About Us Leadership Poli A. Marmolejos Director Office of Hearings and Appeals Poli A. Marmolejos currently serves as Director of the Department of Energy's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). OHA has jurisdiction for conducting administrative hearings and issuing decisions involving various matters, including personnel security and whistleblower complaints, and appeals brought under the Freedom of Information Act. Prior to joining OHA, Mr. More about Director Marmolejos Fred L. Brown Deputy Director of Office of Hearings & Appeals Fred Brown is the Deputy Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. More about Deputy Director Brown Janet N. Freimuth Chief of the Employee Protection and Exceptions Division Ms. Freimuth is the Chief of the Employee Protection and Exceptions

400

Energy and water development appropriations for 1980: Part 8. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Sixth Congress, first session  

SciTech Connect

Hearings were conducted on March 20, 1979 with five power marketing administrations (Alaska Power, Bonneville Power, Southeastern Power, Southwestern Power, and Western Area Power Marketing Administrations) who sought appropriations of funds collected from power sales to operate and maintain the five administrations. On March 21, 1979, the hearing deals with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's request of $73.9 million to support a staff level of 1800 positions for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1980. The March 22, 1979 hearing deals with the Department of Energy's 1980 budget request. The hearing on February 13, 1979 deals with a discussion of the proposed FY 1979 reprogramming of $22.7 million to correct a substantial funding shortage in the Department of Energy's services and benefits. This reprogramming action would increase the amount appropriated for program administration from $292.5 million to $313.6 million. The shortage centers around the fact that the FY 1979 budget requests were prepared on the basis of estimates from the individual agencies which were combined into the Department of Energy on October 1, 1977. Statements are included from many witnesses at these hearings. (MCW)

1979-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Notice of Public Hearings for the Proposed Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Inteconnect (DOE/EIS-0372) (09/12/05)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Federal Register 6 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 175 / Monday, September 12, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [Docket No. PP-89-1] Notice of Public Hearings for the Proposed Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of public hearings. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces two public hearings on the ''Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect'' (DOE/EIS-0372). The Draft EIS was prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., the Council on Environmental Quality NEPA regulations, 40 CFR parts 1500-1508, and the DOE NEPA regulations, 10 CFR part 1021. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife

402

United States Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: ) ) Philips Lighting Company; ) Case Nos.: EXC-12-0001 GE Lighting; and ) EXC-12-0002 OSRAM SYLVANIA, Inc. ) EXC-12-0003 ) Filing Date: February 22, 2012 ) ____________________________________) Issued: April 16, 2012 _____________________ Decision and Order ______________________ This Decision and Order considers Applications for Exception filed by Philips Lighting Company (Philips), GE Lighting (GE) and OSRAM SYLVANIA, Inc. (OSI) (collectively, "the Applicants"), seeking exception relief from the applicable provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430, pertaining to Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards and Test

403

Great Plains coal gasification project. Hearing before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, Second Session, September 12, 1988  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The hearing was called to review the announcement by the Department of Energy that it has selected Basin Electric Power Cooperative of Bismarck, North Dakota, as the preferred buyer for the Great Plains Coal Gasification Plant. The plant produces 142 billion standard cubic feet of synthetic natural gas per day from lignite coal plus several byproducts which are marketed. The hearing examines the bids of the finalists, the composition of the trust funds, the status of the siting permits, questions of air quality, employee retirement funds and employee benefits, and the ability of the successful bidder to pursue byproduct development and marketing. Testimony was heard from 7 witnesses.

Not Available

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Northern California Power Agency's Notice of Intention to seek certification for NCPA Geothermal Project No. 1 (79-NOI-1). Summary and Hearing Order  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The principal issues raised in the proceedings to date are summarized and the following are identified: issues to be adjudicated in subsequent hearings, issues which have been eliminated from the proceedings, and issues which should be deferred until the certification process. The proposed geothermal project is described and the hearing record is summarized. Findings are presented on the following: air quality, hydrology and water resources, water quality, geology and seismicity, soils, biological resources, noise, cultural resources, socioeconomic effects, need for the project, financial impacts, public health, safety and reliability, transmission lines, and civil and structural engineering. (MHR)

Not Available

1979-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

OIl removal from Blackfeet lease. Hearing before the Select Committee on Indian Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-Seventh Congress, First Session, August 10, 1981  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Members of the Blackfeet Tribe, oil-industry representatives, and members of the US Geological Survey and the Bureau of Indian Affairs testified at a hearing in Great Falls, Montana on the ownership of oil moved from an Indian lease to a point of purchase. The purpose was to establish the procedure by which the Geological Survey monitors and traces oil movement in order to prevent and detect theft from the reservation. The hearing was the result of improper movement, with all the fifteen witnesses explaining their involvement in the incident.

Not Available

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

Energy and water development appropriations for 1985. Part 2. Hearings before the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 2 of the hearing record covers testimony given by the Corps of Engineers on the Lower Mississippi Valley, Southwestern, North Pacific, South Pacific, and Pacific Ocean Divisions, and by the Delaware and Susquehanna River Basin Commissions and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Representatives of the Corps' engineering, planning, and program development offices described projects in each of the divisions which relate to navigation, flood control, job development, and other matters. The Committee reviewed appropriation levels for each of the projects. The hearing record includes background and supporting documentation as well as the statements and testimony of the witnesses.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Process Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

...flash-welding applications include: Chain links Transmission bands Automotive flywheel ring gears Strips that are joined for continuous processing lines Wire and bar drawing operations for continuous stamping press

408

Superabrasive Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 2   Typical applications of superabrasives...airports, highways Mining products Stone, shale, rock Drilling Precision grinding wheels Carbide Tool production and resharpening; wear parts and

409

Industrial Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 2   Frequently used rubber linings in other industries...Application Lining Power industry Scrubber towers Blended chlorobutyl Limestone slurry tanks Blended chlorobutyl Slurry piping Blended chlorobutyl 60 Shore A hardness natural rubber Seawater cooling water

410

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31 - 7440 of 29,416 results. 31 - 7440 of 29,416 results. Download EIS-0269: Record of Decision Long-Term Management and Use of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride, Paduch, Kentucky; Portsmouth, Ohio; and Oak Ridge, Tennessee http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0269-record-decision Download EIS-0283: Notice of Public Hearing on the Supplement to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Surplus Plutonium Disposition http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0283-notice-public-hearing-supplement-draft-environmental-impact-statement Download VEE-0081- In the Matter of North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. On February 25, 2002, North Side Coal & Oil Co., Inc. (North Side) of Milwaukee, Wisconsin filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of...

411

Microsoft Word - 1004.TSO.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 23, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Hearing Officer's Decision Name of Case: Personnel Security Hearing Date of Filing: February 10, 2011 Case Number: TSO-1004 This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter "the Individual") to have his suspended access authorization restored. 1 After reviewing the testimony and evidence presented in this matter, it is my decision that the Individual's access authorization should not be restored. 2 I. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The regulations governing the Individual's eligibility are set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." Under Part 710, if derogatory information has been received regarding an individual

412

OHA 2007 ANNUAL REPORT FINAL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of of Hearings Hearings Appeals & FY 2007 Annual Report Doe/hg-0019 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Hearings Appeals & FY 2007 Annual Report Message from the acting Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 I. Areas of Adjudication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 A. Personnel Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B. Contractor Employee Protection Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 C. Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 D. Exception and Special Redress. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 E. The Crude Oil Overcharge Refund Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

413

Novel Zigzag Shape Gives Sensors Magnetic Appeal  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have designed tiny magnetic sensors in a "zigzag" shape that are ... Zigzag-shaped magnetic sensors. ...

2013-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

414

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on a detailed history of the oyster site; the government reports con- cluding that New Carissa oil entered fashion, simply wanted to make whole those parties damaged by an oil spill. [13] The legislative history, involving the destruction of oyster beds which allegedly occurred as a result of an oil spill on the Oregon

Sadeh, Norman M.

415

DOE Solar Decathlon: News Blog Market Appeal  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

University of Maryland Wins Solar Decathlon 2011 http:www.solardecathlon.govblogarchives1906 http:www.solardecathlon.govblogarchives1906comments Sat, 01 Oct 2011...

416

DOE Solar Decathlon: News Blog Market Appeal  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and KentuckyIndiana from University of Louisville, Ball State University, and University of Kentucky (248,423). Team Ontario from Queen's University, Carleton...

417

EIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 20, 1994 September 20, 1994 LEE-0163 - In the Matter of Pierce Oil Co., Inc. On September 20, 1994, Pierce Oil Co., Inc. (Pierce) of Price, Utah, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. In its Application, Pierce requests that it be relieved of the requirement that it file the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) form entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report" (Form EIA-782B). As explained below, we have determined that the Application for Exception should be denied. September 16, 1994 LEE-0161 - In the Matter of Coker Oil, Inc. On September 16, 1994, Coker Oil, Inc. (Coker) of Lake City, South Carolina, filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings

418

NERSC Applications Software  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

For Users Software Applications Applications List of Applications List of math, chemistry and materials science software installed at NERSC. Mathematical Applications...

419

Applicant Organization: | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applicant Organization: Applicant Organization: Applicant Organization: More Documents & Publications BlueFire Ethanol, Inc. Applicant Organization: Applicant Organization:...

420

Physics Applications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Applications Applications Technetium-99m radioisotope generator developed at Brookhaven. Numerous physics-related programs at Brookhaven have yielded major advances in medicine and various technologies. Brookhaven's nuclear medicine program, which began in the 1950s, uses the Brookhaven Linac Isotope Producer to make radioisotopes for nuclear medicine diagnostics and treatment throughout the world. Today, more than 85 percent of all imaging examinations worldwide use one of the radioisotopes developed at Brookhaven. At Brookhaven's Center for Translational Neuroimaging, researchers can peer into a living brain through the use of various imaging modalities, including positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and optical imaging. Such research has led to a new understanding of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Energy and water-development appropriations for 1983. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Seventh Congress, Second Session. Part 3  

SciTech Connect

Secretary of the Interior James Watt's testimony in support of water-development projects opened part three of the hearing record. Also seeking funds to develop both needed water supplies and hydropower were representatives of the Bureau of Reclamation, the Corps of Engineers, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and the Appalachian Regional Commission. (DCK)

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

Energy and water development appropriations for 1999: Part 1. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

This is part 1 of the hearings before the subcommittee on energy and water development of the committee on appropriations, House of Representatives. This includes statements of witnesses from the Department of the Army, the Corps of Engineers, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and Chief of Engineers on topics of funding for the activities of these departments.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

423

Energy and water development appropriations for 1994. Hearings before the Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session, Part 3  

SciTech Connect

This document of part 3 of the hearings for the Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1994. This document contains the testimony of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Bureau of Reclamation, the Secretary of the Interior, Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Delaware River Basin Commission, Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, Tennessee Valley Authority, and Appalachian Regional Commission.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

424

Energy and water development appropriations for 1996. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, Part 8  

SciTech Connect

The report covers hearings to authorize energy and water appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for the Department of Energy. The programs for environment, safety and health, energy research, geothermal, biomass, solar and renewable energy sources, nuclear energy and departmental activities are examined. Statements and documents provided for the record are included from government and industry officials.

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

425

Energy and water development appropriations for 1999: Part 5. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

This is part 5 of the hearings before the subcommittee on energy and water development of the committee on appropriations. Included are statements from witnesses of the Secretary of Energy, departmental administration, energy research, renewable energy, nuclear energy, Power Marketing Administration, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

426

Energy and water development appropriations for 1994. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session. Part 8  

SciTech Connect

Part 8 of the hearings for Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1994 contains the testimony of members of Congress and other interested individuals and organizations. The names of all witnesses providing testimony are indexed with relevant page numbers for reference at the end of this volume.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

Energy and water development appropriations for 1994. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session, Part 7  

SciTech Connect

Presented here is Part 7 of the hearings on Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1994. This volume contains the testimony of members of Congress and other interested individuals and organizations. An alphabetical listing of witnesses is provided at the end of this document.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

428

Energy and water development appropriations for 1999: Part 3. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, On Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

These are the hearings before the subcommittee on energy and water development of the committed on appropriations, House of Representatives. The topics include the Bureau of Reclamation, testimony of the Secretary of the Interior, Appalachian Regional Commission, and the Tennessee Valley Authority. The discussion is related to the funding of activities in these areas.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

429

Energy and water development appropriations for fiscal year 1994. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session  

SciTech Connect

The hearings (H.R. 2445) address the Energy & Water Development Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1994. The Bonneville Power Administrations budget proposal were discussed. The need for cost cutting and a competitive rate structure were stressed. Statements and documents submitted for record by government officials are included.

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

430

Energy and water development appropriations for 1999: Part 6. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

This is part 6 of the hearings before the subcommittee on energy and water development of the committee on appropriations. Included are statements from witnesses of the Department of Energy, environmental management and commercial waste management, nuclear waste technical review board, atomic energy defense activities, naval reactors, and defense nuclear facilities safety board.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

431

Energy and water development appropriations for 1996. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, Part 6  

SciTech Connect

The report covers hearings to authorize energy and water appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for the Department of Energy. The programs for defense, environment, power marketing, nuclear energy, waste management and departmental activities are examined. Statements and documents provided for the record are included from government and industry officials.

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

432

Energy and water appropriations, fiscal year 1999. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

These are hearings on H.R. 2203/S. 1004 an act making appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998. Witnesses before the committee were from the US DOE for atomic energy defense activities, Office of Energy Research; US DOD, civil; US Corps of Engineers, civil; and US DOI, Bureau of Reclamation.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

433

Energy and water development appropriations for 1994. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session  

SciTech Connect

These hearings concern the Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1994, testimony heard by the Energy and Water Development Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations. Over 1,000 witnesses are listed including members of Congress and other interested individuals and organizations.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

Energy and water development appropriations for 1987. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, Second Session, Part 7  

SciTech Connect

Part 7 of the hearing record includes the testimony given by congressmen and by interested individuals and organizations in support or opposition to proposed projects. The testimony is grouped by project, and covers individual water and energy projects in specific locations, biomass, power marketing, and other energy programs. Supporting documentation appears with the testimony.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

Energy and water development appropriations for 1996. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, Part 5  

SciTech Connect

The report covers hearings to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for the Department of Energy. The programs for environment, safety and health, energy research, solar and renewable energy sources, nuclear energy and departmental activities are examined. Statements and documents provided for the record are included.

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

436

Energy and water development appropriations, fiscal year 1998. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, US Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, First Session  

SciTech Connect

These are hearings on H.R. 2203/S. 1004 an act making appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998. Witnesses before the committee were from the US DOE for atomic energy defense activities, the Bonneville Power Administration, environmental restoration and waste management; the US DOI, bureau of reclamation; US DOD, civil; and Corps of Engineers, civil.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

437

Energy and water development appropriations for 1994. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session. Part 6  

SciTech Connect

Part 6 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1994 contains hearings for (1) Environmental Restoration and Waste Management; Environment, Safety, and Health; (2) Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Budget Justifications; (3) Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board; (4) Atomic Energy Defense Activities; and (5) Naval Reactors. Along with the budget requests, accomplishments and justifications for the proposed budgets are presented.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

Energy and water development appropriations for 1999: Part 7. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

These are the hearings before the subcommittee on energy and water development of the committee on appropriations, House of Representatives. This is part 7 which includes the testimony of members of congress and other interested individuals and organizations. Discussion includes funding of various US DOE programs and projects relating to energy efficiency and other topics.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

439

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0013.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hearing and Appeals Hearing and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: February 22, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0013 ) ______________________________________ ) Issued: June 7, 2012 ____________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ William M. Schwartz, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (the individual) to hold an access authorization (also called a security clearance) under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." 1 For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that the individual's security clearance should not be restored.

440

Effects of Tidal Turbine Noise on Fish Hearing and Tissues - Draft Final Report - Environmental Effects of Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Snohomish Public Utility District No.1 plans to deploy two 6 meter OpenHydro tidal turbines in Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, under a FERC pilot permitting process. Regulators and stakeholders have raised questions about the potential effect of noise from the turbines on marine life. Noise in the aquatic environment is known to be a stressor to many types of aquatic life, including marine mammals, fish and birds. Marine mammals and birds are exceptionally difficult to work with for technical and regulatory reasons. Fish have been used as surrogates for other aquatic organisms as they have similar auditory structures. This project was funded under the FY09 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) to Snohomish PUD, in partnership with the University of Washington - Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center, the Sea Mammal Research Unit, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. The results of this study will inform the larger research project outcomes. Proposed tidal turbine deployments in coastal waters are likely to propagate noise into nearby waters, potentially causing stress to native organisms. For this set of experiments, juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) were used as the experimental model. Plans exist for prototype tidal turbines to be deployed into their habitat. Noise is known to affect fish in many ways, such as causing a threshold shift in auditory sensitivity or tissue damage. The characteristics of noise, its spectra and level, are important factors that influence the potential for the noise to injure fish. For example, the frequency range of the tidal turbine noise includes the audiogram (frequency range of hearing) of most fish. This study was performed during FY 2011 to determine if noise generated by a 6-m diameter OpenHydro turbine might affect juvenile Chinook salmon hearing or cause barotrauma. Naturally spawning stocks of Chinook salmon that utilize Puget Sound are listed as threatened (http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/ESA-Salmon-Listings/Salmon-Populations/Chinook/CKPUG.cfm); the fish used in this experiment were hatchery raised and their populations are not in danger of depletion. After they were exposed to simulated tidal turbine noise, the hearing of juvenile Chinook salmon was measured and necropsies performed to check for tissue damage. Experimental groups were (1) noise exposed, (2) control (the same handling as treatment fish but without exposure to tidal turbine noise), and (3) baseline (never handled). Experimental results indicate that non-lethal, low levels of tissue damage may have occurred but that there were no effects of noise exposure on the auditory systems of the test fish.

Halvorsen, Michele B.; Carlson, Thomas J.; Copping, Andrea E.

2011-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

ARM - Field Campaign - Application of the ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) to  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

govCampaignsApplication of the ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) to Study the govCampaignsApplication of the ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) to Study the Aerosol Indirect Effects in China Campaign Links China Website Comments? We would love to hear from you! Send us a note below or call us at 1-888-ARM-DATA. Send Campaign : Application of the ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) to Study the Aerosol Indirect Effects in China 2008.05.15 - 2008.12.29 Website : http://www.arm.gov/sites/amf/hfe/ Lead Scientist : Zhanqing Li For data sets, see below. Description Aerosols in China have exceptionally high loading and diverse properties whose influence has been detected across the Pacific Rim. The rapid pace of changes in the atmospheric environment over China provides a natural testbed for identifying and quantifying the climatic effects of aerosols. Preliminary analyses of multiple satellite datasets (MODIS, TMI, TRMM)

442

Application Acceleration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Acceleration Acceleration on Current and Future Cray Platforms Alice Koniges, Robert Preissl, Jihan Kim, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory David Eder, Aaron Fisher, Nathan Masters, Velimir Mlaker, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Stephane Ethier, Weixing Wang, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Martin Head-Gordon, University of California, Berkeley and Nathan Wichmann, Cray Inc. ABSTRACT: Application codes in a variety of areas are being updated for performance on the latest architectures. We describe current bottlenecks and performance improvement areas for applications including plasma physics, chemistry related to carbon capture and sequestration, and material science. We include a variety of methods including advanced hybrid parallelization using multi-threaded MPI, GPU acceleration, libraries and auto- parallelization compilers. KEYWORDS: hybrid

443

Ridefinders Application  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

23 23 (05-92) Ridefinders Application Please submit this application to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Employee Transportation Coordinator, Room 7A-156, Forrestal. U.S. Department of Energy Privacy Act Statement Check all transportation options which interest you: Carpool: Driver Share Driving Rider Vanpool: Driver Share Driving Rider Do you wish to meet your pool in your neighborhood? No (If no, see Alternate Pickup Locations below.) Yes Participation in the Federal Facility Ridesharing Program is voluntary and a private accommodation of employees rather than a Federal activity. Ridefinders Network will observe Privacy Act requirements because participation requires solicitation of personal information. The information collected will be used to maintain an accurate database of those individuals participating in the program and to provide individual ridematch lists

444

Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies appropriations for 1994. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session  

SciTech Connect

These hearings of the HR Subcommittee on the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Services, include appropriation considerations and testimony for the National Center for Human Genome Research under the National Institutes of Health appropriation.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

Energy and water development appropriations for 1984. Part 4. Department of Energy FY 1984 budget justifications. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, First Session  

SciTech Connect

Text of the hearings is presented covering budget highlights; atomic energy defense activities; energy supply, research and development, general science and research; uranium enrichment; geothermal resources development fund; power marketing administration; departmental administration; and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (PSB)

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

446

Energy and water development appropriations for Fiscal Year 1983. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Ninety-Seventh Congress, Second Session, Part 4 (Pages 2185-2717), Nondepartmental witnesses  

SciTech Connect

Part four of the hearing record covers the testimony of nondepartmental witnesses, including congressmen from affected states, on water- and energy-related projects. The record includes their prepared statements, supporting documents, and responses to committee questions. (DCK)

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

Energy and water development appropriations for 1995. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, Second Session, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, Part 6  

SciTech Connect

These are hearings on energy and water development appropriations. Included are the following areas: Environmental restoration and waste management; environment, safety and health; atomic energy defense activities; naval reactors; defense nuclear facilities safety board; power marketing administrations.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

448

Energy and water development appropriations for fiscal year 1993. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, Second Session on H.R. 5373  

SciTech Connect

The hearings on H.R. 5373, an act making appropriations for Energy and Water development for the Fiscal Year ending September 30, 1993. The hearing covered appropriations for: Bonneville Power Administration; Department of Energy; Department of Army - Corps of Engineers - Civil; and the Tennessee Valley Authority. Statements of witnesses in regarding to the committee questions are included, along with documents submitted for the record by officials of the agencies involved in supporting the appropriations requested.

1992-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

449

Ordered arrays of nanocrystals : synthesis, properties and applications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Nanoscale materials, including nanocrystals and carbon nanotubes, exhibit an appealing array of physical properties, and provide an interesting prospect for research both from a fundamental as well as a technological ...

Bhaviripudi, Sreekar

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

NIST Laser Applications Group Homepage  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Laser Applications Group. Welcome. The Laser Applications Group advances laser technology for applications in optical ...

2012-05-10T23:59:59.000Z

451

Energy and water development appropriations for 1988. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, First Session, Part 2  

SciTech Connect

Part 2 of the hearing record covers testimony relating to appropriations for the Corps of Engineers, with separate sections on the North Pacific, North Central, North Atlantic, South Atlantic, New England, and Pacific Ocean divisions of the Corps and the Commissions for each of the Potomac, Delaware, and Susquehanna river basins. A list of witnesses appears at the beginning of each section. Descriptions of the various energy and water development programs and future plans, along with funding requirements, make up the testimony.

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

452

Energy and water development appropriations for 1983. Hearings before a Subcommittee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Seventh Congress, Second Session. Part 2  

SciTech Connect

Part 2 of the hearing record covers the testimony of Corps of Engineers of the Missouri River, North Pacific, Ohio River, Pacific Ocean, South Pacific, and Southwestern Divisions, as well as the testimony of officials from the Delaware and Susquehanna River Basins and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. The committee received information on water projects pertinent to the 1983 budget appropriations. (DCK)

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Product Efficiency Cases  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

product-efficiency-cases Office of Hearings and product-efficiency-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en EXC-13-0004 - In the Matter of Liebherr Canada Ltd. http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/exc-13-0004-matter-liebherr-canada-ltd EXC-13-0004 - In the Matter of Liebherr Canada Ltd.

454

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11 - 3920 of 28,905 results. 11 - 3920 of 28,905 results. Download HSS Focus Group Meeting (Topical Meeting) Safety Standards/10 CFR 851 Meeting agenda, summary and information package Meeting Date: July 17, 2008 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/hss-focus-group-meeting-topical-meeting-2 Download VWD-0007- In the Matter of Linda D. Gass This determination will consider a Motion for Discovery filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) by Linda D. Gass. This Motion, dated August 10, 1999, concerns the hearing requested by... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vwd-0007-matter-linda-d-gass Download Application to Export Electric Energy OE Docket No. EA-327-A DC Energy LLC: Federal Register Notice, Volume 77, No. 102- May 25, 2012 Application from DC Energy to export electric energy to Canada. Federal

455

Transportation Applications  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The purpose of this project is to systematically identify and examine possible near and long-term ecological and environmental effects from the production of hydrogen from various energy sources based on the DOE hydrogen production strategy and the use of that hydrogen in transportation applications. This project uses state-of-the-art numerical modeling tools of the environment and energy system emissions in combination with relevant new and prior measurements and other analyses to assess the understanding of the potential ecological and environmental impacts from hydrogen market penetration. H2 technology options and market penetration scenarios will be evaluated using energy-technology-economics models as well as atmospheric trace gas projections based on the IPCC SRES scenarios including the decline in halocarbons due to the Montreal Protocol. Specifically we investigate the impact of hydrogen releases on the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere, the long-term stability of the ozone layer due to changes in hydrogen emissions, the impact of hydrogen emissions and resulting concentrations on climate, the impact on microbial ecosystems involved in hydrogen uptake, and criteria pollutants emitted from distributed and centralized hydrogen production pathways and their impacts on human health, air quality, ecosystems, and structures under different penetration scenarios

Wuebbles, D.J.; Dubey, M.K., Edmonds, J.; Layzell, D.; Olsen, S.; Rahn, T.; Rocket, A.; Wang, D.; Jia, W.

2010-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

Case No. VBA-0032  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 November 26, 1999 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Roger H. Hardwick Date of Filing: July 26, 1999 Case Number: VBA-0032 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision issued on July 6, 1999, on a complaint filed by Roger H. Hardwick (Hardwick or the complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In his complaint, Hardwick seeks compensation for alleged retaliatory actions taken against him by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a DOE contractor, and by KenRob and Associates, Inc. (KenRob), his former employer under a subcontract with SAIC, as a result of making an alleged protected disclosure to DOE. In the Initial Agency Decision, however, the Hearing Officer determined that the complainant had failed to

457

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41 - 16250 of 31,917 results. 41 - 16250 of 31,917 results. Download FIA-13-0017- In the Matter of Partnership for Policy Integrity On March 28, 2013, The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) granted in part and denied in all other aspects an Appeal filed by Partnership for Policy Integrity (the Appellant) under the FOIA of two... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0017-matter-partnership-policy-integrity Download Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 (State Department, 44 Fed Reg 65560) The following unified procedures issued by the State Department are established to satisfy the requirement of the Executive Order for implementing procedures concerning nuclear export activities of Federal agencies.

458

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

691 - 8700 of 28,905 results. 691 - 8700 of 28,905 results. Download TEE-0025- In the Matter of LG Electronics, Inc. This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by LG Electronics, Inc. (LG) seeking exception relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430, Energy Conservation Program for... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/tee-0025-matter-lg-electronics-inc Download EIS-0128-SA-01: Record of Decision Los Banos-Gates Transmission Project http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0128-sa-01-record-decision Download FIA-12-0051- In the Matter of William Berger On October 9, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy's National... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-12-0051-matter-william-berger

459

Microsoft Word - 1103.tso.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: September 1, 2011 ) ) Case No.: TSO-1103 ) ___________________________________ ) Issued: February 28, 2012 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Valerie Vance Adeyeye, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual@) to hold an access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part

460

Final environmental impact statement. Management of commercially generated radioactive waste. Volume 3. Public comments hearing board report  

SciTech Connect

This EIS analyzes the significant environmental impacts that could occur if various technologies for management and disposal of high-level and transuranic wastes from commercial nuclear power reactors were to be developed and implemented. This EIS will serve as the environmental input for the decision on which technology, or technologies, will be emphasized in further research and development activities in the commercial waste management program. The action proposed in this EIS is to (1) adopt a national strategy to develop mined geologic repositories for disposal of commercially generated high-level and transuranic radioactive waste (while continuing to examine subseabed and very deep hole disposal as potential backup technologies) and (2) conduct a R and D program to develop such facilities and the necessary technology to ensure the safe long-term containment and isolation of these wastes. The Department has considered in this statement: development of conventionally mined deep geologic repositories for disposal of spent fuel from nuclear power reactors and/or radioactive fuel reprocessing wastes; balanced development of several alternative disposal methods; and no waste disposal action. This volume contains written public comments and hearing board responses and reports offered on the draft statement.

Not Available

1980-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Case Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Name of Petitioner: Name of Petitioner: Date of Filing: Case Number: Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 JUL 2 2 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Dean P. Dennis March 2, 2009 TBA-0072 Dean D. Dennis filed a complaint of retaliation under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. Mr. Dennis alleged that he engaged in protected activity and that his employer, National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec ), subsequently terminated him. An Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer denied relief in Dean P. Dennis, Case No. TBH-0072, 1 and Mr. Dennis filed the instant appeal. As discussed below, the appeal is denied. I. Background The DOE established its Contractor Employee Protection Program to "safeguard public

462

FOIA Cases  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

foia-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 foia-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en FIA-13-0077 - In the Matter of John F. Garrity http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0077-matter-john-f-garrity FIA-13-0077 - In the Matter of John F. Garrity

463

1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Samsung originally filed its submission as an Application for Samsung originally filed its submission as an Application for Waiver under 10 C.F.R. § 430.27. However, it has been determined that Samsung's request for relief is more appropriately considered as an Application for Exception under 10 C.F.R. Part 1003, Subpart B-Exceptions. Samsung has agreed to this procedural approach. See Memorandum of July 20, 2007 Telephone Conversation. Accordingly, we will consider its application under that Subpart and will refer to its submission as an Application for Exception or exception request. July 26, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Samsung Electronics America Date of Filing: July 16, 2007 Case Number: TEE-0047 This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception

464

Anniversary Scholarship Application Form  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

at the University of Cambridge should complete the application form below and send it to The Pakistan Application Pakistan. Pakistan nationals who attend schools outside Pakistan are not eligible. 2. Applicants must complete the scholarship application form should be submitted to: The Pakistan Application Centre Cambridge

Travis, Adrian

465

VWD-0002- In the Matter of Frank E. Isbill  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This determination will consider two requests for discovery filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) on May 4, 1999, by Frank E. Isbill (the complainant). These requests (which have been...

466

WBA-12-0001- In the Matter of Wendy L. Warren | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WBA-12-0001- In the Matter of Wendy L. Warren WBA-12-0001- In the Matter of Wendy L. Warren On December 20, 2012, the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals...

467

FIA-13-0054 - In the Matter of Dow Jones & Company | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Matter of Dow Jones & Company FIA-13-0054 - In the Matter of Dow Jones & Company On August 19, 2013, The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) granted in part and denied in...

468

Case No. VBA-0010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

"would have known by exercise of reasonable care." Appeal at 20, citing Black's Law Dictionary (6th Ed.). However, the term nevertheless seems apt. In the IAD, the Hearing Officer...

469

FIA-13-0060A - In the Matter of Nuclear Watch New Mexico | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FIA-13-0060A - In the Matter of Nuclear Watch New Mexico FIA-13-0060A - In the Matter of Nuclear Watch New Mexico On October 24, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA)...

470

FOIA Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 16, 2012 November 16, 2012 FIA-12-0069 - In the Matter of Mary Ann Parker On November 16, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Privacy Act determination issued by the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Office (ORO). Specifically, the Appellant, Mary Ann Parker, contested the adequacy of the ORO's search in response to her Privacy Act request, contending that additional records should have been provided and that records from a plant that she previously worked at, the Pinellas Plant, should have been sent to the Albuquerque Office. November 14, 2012 FIA-12-0070 - In the Matter of Robert Huber On November 14, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act

471

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

01 - 21810 of 28,905 results. 01 - 21810 of 28,905 results. Download FIA-12-0066- In the Matter of Chadbourne & Parke LLP On November 8, 2012, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-12-0066-matter-chadbourne-parke-llp Download FIA-13-0016- In the Matter of Newport Partners, LLC On April 2, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Golden Field Office. The... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0016-matter-newport-partners-llc Article Summary of Decisions- July 15, 2013- July 19, 2013 Decisions were issued on:

472

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61 - 13270 of 26,764 results. 61 - 13270 of 26,764 results. Download NO FEAR Act Notice The Department of Energy's notice for the No FEAR Act. To learn more about the No FEAR Act, visit this page. http://energy.gov/diversity/downloads/no-fear-act-notice Download FIA-13-0047- In the Matter of Brian Simmons On July 17, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying a consolidated appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Idaho... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0047-matter-brian-simmons Download FIA-13-0048- In the Matter of Ralph Stanton On July 17, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying a consolidated appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Idaho...

473

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31 - 20940 of 28,905 results. 31 - 20940 of 28,905 results. Download EA-176 Sempra Energy Trading Corporation http://energy.gov/oe/downloads/ea-176-sempra-energy-trading-corporation-0 Download FIA-13-0029- In the Matter of Post Register On June 12, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision remanding an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of Energy's... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0029-matter-post-register Download FIA-13-0036- In the Matter of Sierra Club On June 25, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting in part an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Department of... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/fia-13-0036-matter-sierra-club

474

Synthesis, Properties and Applications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Jul 15, 2013 ... Applications of nanomaterials in energy harvesting, energy storage and energy delivery. Applications to biological and chemical sensing and...

475

Postdoc Application Process  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program Application Process Postdoc Application Process Point your career towards LANL: work with the best minds on the planet in an inclusive environment that is rich in...

476

Approved Chemist Application 2012  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

APPROVED CHEMIST APPLICATION 1. Name of Applicant 2. Company 3. Address 4. Analyst Number (2011) 5. City 6. State 7. Postal Code

477

Industrial Applications of Renewable Resources  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Archive of Industrial Applications of Renewable Resources Industrial Applications of Renewable Resources Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Industrial Applications of Renewable Resources ...

478

VEE-0091 - In the Matter of Jefferson Smurfit Corp. | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 - In the Matter of Jefferson Smurfit Corp. 1 - In the Matter of Jefferson Smurfit Corp. VEE-0091 - In the Matter of Jefferson Smurfit Corp. This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the provisions of 10 C.F.R. § 1003.20. See infra Appendix. These Applications concern annual revenues and sales data pertaining to each firm's sale of electricity that the DOE Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects through Form EIA-861, "Annual Electric Power Industry Report." EIA publishes this data, by state, in firm-specific form. The present exception request seeks to have the Applicants' data withheld as confidential. In their Applications for Exception, the Applicants incorporated an Application for Stay to prevent release of some of the

479

VEE-0092 - In the Matter of Cargill, Incorporated. | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 - In the Matter of Cargill, Incorporated. 2 - In the Matter of Cargill, Incorporated. VEE-0092 - In the Matter of Cargill, Incorporated. This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the provisions of 10 C.F.R. § 1003.20. See infra Appendix. These Applications concern annual revenues and sales data pertaining to each firm's sale of electricity that the DOE Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects through Form EIA-861, "Annual Electric Power Industry Report." EIA publishes this data, by state, in firm-specific form. The present exception request seeks to have the Applicants' data withheld as confidential. In their Applications for Exception, the Applicants incorporated an Application for Stay to prevent release of some of the

480

Greenhouse effect and global climate change. Hearings before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, First Session, November 9 and 10, 1987  

SciTech Connect

A two-day hearing on the environmental implications of build-up of carbon dioxide and trace gases in the atmosphere, commonly referred to as the greenhouse effect, brought testimony from atmospheric scientists and government officials. Testimony was given regarding the growing scientific concern that by the next century, the temperature of the earth's atmosphere may increase to a level unmatched in thousands of years. This temperature change will result in a climate change five to ten times as great as that caused by the last ice age.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "appeals hearings application" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Energy and water development appropriations for 1988. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, First Session, Part 1  

SciTech Connect

Part 1 of the hearing record covers testimony relating to the Corps of Engineers, with separate section on the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and Chief of Engineers and the South Pacific, Ohio River, Missouri River, Lower Mississippi Valley, and Southwestern divisions. Each section begins with a list of witnesses, followed by a description of Corps programs and accomplishment, future plans, and budget requirements. Witnesses emphasized the president's commitment to a responsible development of water and energy resources.

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

482

Energy and water development appropriations for 1983. Part 6. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Seventh Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 6 of the hearing record covers five DOE programs on atomic energy, defense, nuclear fission and civilian waste management, fusion energy and basic energy sciences, environmental, and departmental administration, as well as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Herman E. Roser, DOE Assistant Secretary for Defense Programs, began with an overview of nuclear weapons, safeguards technology, and security investigations, with a total budget of $5.5 billion. Witnesses describe the status of research and development in each program and the budget requirements to meet national goals. (DCK)

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

483

Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1987. Part 4. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 4 of the hearing record provides highlights of the budget justifications, followed by detailed information and testimony relating to the budgets for: atomic energy defense; energy supply, research, and development; the Nuclear Waste Fund; general science and research; uranium enrichment; the Geothermal Resources Development Fund; power marketing administrations; DOE administration; and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The introductory summary highlights allocations of the total budget of $19 billion, the largest portion (36%) going for business enterprises, followed by 25% to defense production, 24% to research and development, 12% to waste activities, 2% to departmental management, and 1% to grants and other activities.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

484

Energy and water development appropriations for 1985. Hearings before the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 3 of the hearing record covers the testimony of Interior Secretary William Clark and witnesses from the Bureau of Reclamation, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and the Appalachian Regional Commission. Clark cited the accomplishments of the Bureau of Reclamation during his first three months in office and described the reorganization of the Department's 10 bureaus. His testimony on water policy covers cost sharing for flood control, irrigation, and other water projects. Questions directed to Clark and the other witnesses also dealt with resource development, program management, and the status and level of appropriations for specific projects of concern to committee members.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

485

Energy and water development appropriations for 1986. Part 3. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 3 of the hearing record covers testimony given by the Director and managers of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), the chairman and advisors of the Appalachian Regional Commission, the Secretary of the Interior, and representatives of the Bureau of Reclamation. The witnesses presented the administration's budget requests for fiscal year 1986, described the anticipated income and expenditures of their programs, and presented details of specific projects. The administration's proposals were significantly reduced over previous funding levels, and termination was the recommendation for the Appalachian Regional Commission. Supporting documentation accompanies the testimony of the 18 witnesses.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

Energy and water development appropriations for 1985. Hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, second session  

SciTech Connect

Part 4 of the hearing record covers DOE budget justifications for atomic energy defense activities; energy supply, research, and development; the Nuclear Waste Fund; general science and research; uranium enrichment; the Geothermal Resources Development Fund; power marketing and departmental administrations; and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Highlights from the budget note that it continues support for a mix of energy technologies and a commitment to energy security. The budget incorporates and reflects savings initiatives that will save an estimated $143.5 million over the 1984-85 period.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

487

Energy and water development appropriations for 1986. Part 7. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 7 of the hearing record covers three areas of the DOE appropriations: Atomic Energy Defense activities, power marketing administrations, and departmental administration. Representatives of DOE and the US Army reviewed the nuclear defense mission and activities under the defense and arms control programs. The administrators of the Alaska, Bonneville, Southeastern, Southwestern, and Western Power Administrations and a representative of the Conservation and Renewable Energy division described programs and budget requirements, as well as estimates of power demands for their regions. Administrative personnel described DOE procedures and explained the budget requests. Supporting documentation accompanies the testimony of the 16 witnesses.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

488

Energy and water development appropriations for 1986. Part 1. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 1 of the hearing record covers the testimony of witnesses from the Corps of Engineers before the House Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development on appropriations for Corps activities in 1986. The first section of the record gives an overview of civil works programs in the context of the 1986 budget of $2.34 billion. Particular emphasis is on 60 proposed water projects. Separate sections cover testimony by the divisional representatives of the Missouri River, Ohio River, North Central, North Atlantic, New England, and Southwestern Divisions. Their testimony includes details of specific projects and supporting documentation for the projects as well as proposals for cost sharing and user fees.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

489

Energy and water development appropriations for 1987. Part 6. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 6 of the record covers testimony on the budgets and spending needs of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, DOE departmental administration, Power Marketing Administration, and atomic energy defense activities. The latter included testimony from those involved in the Naval Nuclear Propulsion and other nuclear materials and defense programs. Officials of each of the agencies or departments reviewed their budgets in terms of their performance as well as their contribution to the deficit-reducing effort. Documentation supplements each portion of the hearing record.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

490

Energy and water development appropriations for 1986. Part 4. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 4 of the hearing record covers the documentation and supporting justification for DOE's 1986 budget. The volume opens with a section on budget highlights, noting a continued support for a mix of energy technologies while emphasizing long-term basic research and near-term technology transfer to industry. The budget continues to emphasize management reforms that will help to reduce the overall budget deficit. The volume also contains justifications for programs in nuclear defense and nuclear wastes, research and development on energy supply, uranium enrichment, geothermal development, power marketing, DOE administration, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

491

Energy and water development appropriations for 1986. Part 9. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 9 of the hearing record covers the testimony of local citizens and officials, legislators, and other interested persons on proposals for energy and water development projects in several states. Supporting material for individual projects includes various government resolutions, laws, media coverage, and reports by interested parties. The volume begins with the April 2, 1985 testimony of witnesses from Kentucky and concludes with research projects at the Argonne National Laboratory. The record contains the testimony of over 700 witnesses. Indices following the statements and material submitted for the record list all witnesses alphabetically, 82 state projects alphabetically by state or region, and 23 DOE projects.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

492

Energy and water development appropriations for 1987. Part 8. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, Second Session  

SciTech Connect

Part 8 of the hearing record covers testimony given by individuals, organizations, and members of Congress on specific energy and water projects. Part 8 begins with testimony in support of the Coosa-Alabama Waterway and Port of Mobile project, and includes cost details and information about the economic benefits that will accrue to the region with the inland waterway. There is also testimony pertaining to the Warrier-Tombigbee Waterway, the Appalachicola-Chattahoochee Flint Waterway, and projects affecting the Red River and South Columbia Basins, California, and other regions. Supporting documentation accompanies the testimony given for each project.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

493

Ozone depletion, the Greenhouse effect, and climate change. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Environmental Pollution of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-Ninth Congress, Second Session, June 10 and 11, 1986  

SciTech Connect

Witnesses at a two-day hearing on the nature and magnitude of possible risks from the greenhouse effect and depletion of the ozone layer and the government's role in addressing these problems included representatives of universities, international environmental and resource institutes and organizations, manufacturers of fluorocarbons, historians, and government agencies. Prompting the hearings was a DOE report on the risks and need for intensive research and international cooperation in the area of environmental policy. Technical presentations were given by experts in atmospheric chemistry and oceanography. Additional material submitted for the record follows the testimony of the 16 witnesses.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

494

Energy and water development appropriations for fiscal year 1987. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Ninety-Ninth Congress Second Session on H. R. 5162  

SciTech Connect

Part 2 of the hearing record covers five days of Senate hearings on House Resolution 5162 pertaining to the DOE budget appropriations. DOE Secretary Herrington was the first witness to explain and defend the DOE budget. He was followed at subsequent sessions by other DOE representatives associated with solar and renewable energy; environment, safety, and health; nuclear research and development, specifically programs on waste disposal and uranium enrichment; the five Power Marketing Administrations; and defense programs. Herrington noted the cooperative DOE-industry research and development efforts to make innovation and technology transfer more effective, as well as the reductions in federal support for conservation grants.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

495

Energy and water development appropriations for fiscal year 1985. Part 4. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session on H. R. 5653  

SciTech Connect

Part 4 of the Senate hearing record on H.R. 5653, which would appropriate funds for energy and water developments during fiscal year 1985, covers two days of testimony by nondepartmental witnesses. Their testimony covers navigation projects on the lower Mississippi River, flood control on the upper Mississippi, flood control and saltwater barrier projects in Texas, support of the Southeastern Universities Research Association (SURA) project to develop the continuous electron beam accelerator facility (CEBAF) at Newport News, Virginia, and water development projects in California. This volume covers pages 2005-2743 of the hearing record.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

496

Energy and water development appropriations for Fiscal Year 1983. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Ninty-Seventh Congress, Second Session. Part 1  

SciTech Connect

This part, Part 1, of the hearing record covers four days of testimony by representatives of the Corps of Engineers (civil projects), Department of the Interior, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The hearings were held to review the budget requests and programs proposed by each of these agencies for 1983. The principal witnesses were William Gianelli, Assistant Secretary of the Army Corps' Civil Works; James Watt, Secretary of the Interior; Charles Dean, S. David Freeman, and Richard Freeman, Directors of TVA; Nunzio Palladino, Chairman of the NRC; and C.M. Butler, Chairman of FERC. (DCK)

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

497

Energy and water development appropriations for fiscal year 1985. Part 3. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session on H. R. 5653  

SciTech Connect

Part 3 of the hearings on appropriations bill H.R. 5633 contains two days of testimony by nondepartmental witnesses. The first witness was Governor Babbitt of Arizona, who gave an update on the Central Arizona Project and noted the progress of the Granite Reef aqueduct. Other witnesses described projects for flood control, navigation, beach preservation, and projects in a number of states, the Colorado and Mississippi River valleys, and elsewhere. State officials and members of Congress, along with expert witnesses and supporting consultants presented the testimony over the two-day hearing. Background material and the statements and testimony of witnesses appear in chronological order.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

498

Decision Applications: D, Decision Applications: LANL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Decision Applications Division Systems Engineering and Integration, D-3 Energy and Infrastructure Analysis, D-4 Nuclear Design and Risk Analysis, D-5 Risk Analysis and Decision...

499

Department of Water Resources' notice of intention to file an application for certification of DWR Bottle Rock. Final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Preliminary findings and conclusions are presented on the following: conformity to the forecast of statewide and service area electric power demands; conformity of the proposed site and related facilities with applicable local, regional, state, and federal standards, ordinances, and laws, including any long-range land use plans or guidelines adopted by the state or by any local or regional planning agency; the safety and reliability of the facility; and the relative merit of any alternative site and related facility proposed in the notice or in sufficient detail at the hearings. A Proposed Decision, approving the Notice, with conditions for consideration by the full commission is included. A description of the proposed project; a summary of the proceedings to date, comments from the general public, and government agency comments on the Preliminary Report are given. The comments of the applicant and the Commission staff regarding the Preliminary Report and the Committee's view of those issues that require further consideration are included. (MHR)

Not Available

1979-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

500

VEE-0088 - In the Matter of CPKelco Cogeneration, et al. | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

88 - In the Matter of CPKelco Cogeneration, et al. 88 - In the Matter of CPKelco Cogeneration, et al. VEE-0088 - In the Matter of CPKelco Cogeneration, et al. This Decision decides the merits of five Applications for Exception filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the provisions of 10 C.F.R. § 1003.20. See infra Appendix. These Applications concern annual revenues and sales data pertaining to each firm's sale of electricity that the DOE Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects through Form EIA-861, "Annual Electric Power Industry Report." EIA publishes this data, by state, in firm-specific form. The present exception request seeks to have the Applicants' data withheld as confidential. In their Applications for Exception, the Applicants