Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 Annual Performance Results and FYs 2015 and 2016 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 Annual Performance Results and FYs 2015 and 2016 Annual Performance Plan

2

Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan FY 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan FY 2012 2 FY 2011 OIG Performance Results The OIG measures its performance against long-term and annual goals set forth in OIG planning documents. During this reporting period, the OIG successfully achieved its FY 2011 performance goals. The following are the specific results: Goal 1 Promote Presidential Reform Initiatives, Secretarial Mission Priorities, and Congress Objective 1: Conduct reviews seeking positive change in the Department relating to the implementation of Presidential Reform Initiatives, the Secretary's Mission Priorities, and the OIG-identified Management Challenges. Performance Measures: Accomplishments

3

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Annual Performance Report and FY 2003 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Subject: Office of Inspector Generals combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Annual Performance Results and FY 2003 Annual Performance Plan

4

Annual Performance Plan: IG-APP-005 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Plan: IG-APP-005 Plan: IG-APP-005 Annual Performance Plan: IG-APP-005 February 1, 2003 Planning for and Measuring Office of Inspector General Results FY 2002 Annual Performance Report and FY 2003 Annual Performance Plan We are pleased to present the Office of Inspector General's (OIG) consolidated Fiscal Year 2002 Annual Performance Report and Fiscal Year 2003 Annual Performance Plan. This document evaluates our actual Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 performance and establishes the performance goals and strategies we will pursue in FY 2003 to fulfill our mission. As mandated by the Inspector General Act, the OIG promotes the effective, efficient, and economical operation of the Department of Energy's programs and operations, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

5

Office of Inspector General Annual Performance Plan 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Performance Report FY 2010 Performance Report FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan FY 2011 Office of Inspector General DOE/IG-APP012 Annual Performance Report FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan FY 2011 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL II DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, OFFicE OF iNsPEcTOR GENERAl THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FY 2010 ANNUAl PERFORMANcE REPORT III Message from the Inspector General I am pleased to submit the Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year 2010 Annual Performance Report and Fiscal Year 2011 Annual Performance Plan. Over the past year, much of our work has centered on oversight of the Department of Energy's efforts under the American Recovery and Investment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act). Under the Recovery Act, the Department of Energy received just

6

Office of Inspector General Annual Performance Plan 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Inspector General Office of Inspector General Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General This report is also available on the Department of Energy/Office of Inspector General website at http://www.ig.energy.gov ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2009 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN FY 2010 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Message from the Inspector General I am pleased to present the Office of Inspector GeneralÕs combined Fiscal Year 2009 Annual Performance Report and Fiscal Year 2010 Annual Performance Plan. On February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Investment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) was enacted. Under the Recovery Act, the Department of Energy received just under $40 billion for various energy, environmental and science programs and initiatives. The

7

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Annual Performance Results and FY 2008 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office Office of the Inspector General Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General Cover Pictures (from left to right) Handford Site - A remotely operated machine moves on tracks and is equipped to take core samples from the concrete floor at the U Plant Canyon Facility as part of the Canyon Disposition Initiative (CDI). This versatile machine can also be equipped with cameras and other sampling equipment. Technology like this is allowing workers to safely perform work previously not possible due to highly contaminated conditions. A scanning microscope image of platinum-lace nanoballs. Liposomes aggregate, providing a foamline template for a platinum sheet to grow. FM-5 Target Missile lifts off from Kauai Test Facility's Pad 1. ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2007 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN

8

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Annual Performance Results and FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIGs FY 2010 actual performance and FY 2011 planned activities.

9

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Annual Performance Results and FY 2012 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIGs FY 2011 actual performance and FY 2012 planned activities.

10

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Annual Performance Results and FY 2007 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIGs FY 2006 actual performance and FY 2007 planned activities.

11

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Annual Performance Results and FY 2008 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIGs FY 2007 actual performance and FY 2008 planned activities.

12

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Annual Performance Results and FYs 2013 and 2014 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIGs FY 2012 actual performance and FYs 2013 and 2014 planned activities.

13

Annual Training Plan Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Annual Training Plan Template is used by an organization's training POC to draft their organization's annual training plan.

14

Faculty of Medicine Annual Performance Review: Your Personal Review and Development Plan (PRDP)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Faculty of Medicine Annual Performance Review: Your Personal Review and Development Plan (PRDP) Performance review between staff and their line managers is essential. It allows discussion of any problems to get the most out of your PRDP by attending an appropriate course: http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/staffdevelopment/ldc/planning

15

Draft 2014 Annual Plan | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Draft 2014 Annual Plan Draft 2014 Annual Plan Section 999: Draft 2014 Annual Plan Section 999 - Draft 2014 Annual Plan More Documents & Publications 2011 Annual Plan 2013...

16

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

1 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak Ridge Office 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak Ridge Office Managers perform an annual...

17

Performance Plans | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Performance Plans Performance Plans Performance Plans December 13, 2013 Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Annual Performance Results and FYs 2014 and 2015 Annual Performance Plan Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Annual Performance Results and FY 2014-15 Annual Performance Plan December 18, 2012 Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Annual Performance Results and FYs 2013 and 2014 Annual Performance Plan This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG's FY 2012 actual performance and FYs 2013 and 2014 planned activities. November 28, 2011 Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Annual Performance Results and FY 2012 Annual Performance Plan This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG's FY 2011 actual performance and FY 2012 planned activities.

18

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General fiscal year 1999 annual performance plan  

SciTech Connect

This plan is published pursuant to requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. The plan outlines the goals, objectives, and strategies that the Office of Inspector General intends to implement and execute in FY 1999. The plan also includes the details of this office`s efforts to continually improve customer service.

NONE

1998-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Managers perform an annual...

20

LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 More Documents & Publications 2010...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Annual Performance Report  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

left blank U.S. Department of Energy Annual Performance Report, Shiprock, New Mexico October 2014 Doc. No. S12021 Page i Contents Abbreviations ......

22

Annual Planning Summaries: 2013 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Annual Planning Summaries: 2013 March 25, 2013 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Argonne Site Office 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Argonne Site Office March 25, 2013 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Argonne Site Office 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Argonne Site Office January 30, 2013 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Carlsbad Field Office 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Carlsbad Field Office January 30, 2013 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak Ridge Office 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak Ridge Office January 30, 2013 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Western Area Power Administration 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Western Area Power Administration January 29, 2013 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Idaho Operations Office

23

STFC Annual Delivery Plan Report 200STFC Annual Delivery Plan Report 200STFC Annual Delivery Plan Report 200STFC Annual Delivery Plan Report 2009/109/109/109/10 Annual Delivery Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

STFC Annual Delivery Plan Report 200STFC Annual Delivery Plan Report 200STFC Annual Delivery Plan Report 200STFC Annual Delivery Plan Report 2009/109/109/109/10 0 Annual Delivery Report 2009/10 August 2010 #12;STFC Annual Delivery Plan Report 200STFC Annual Delivery Plan Report 200STFC Annual Delivery

24

2010 Annual Plan | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

2010 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program 2009 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and...

25

2009 Annual Plan | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

2009 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program 2010 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and...

26

Annual Planning Summaries: 2014 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

4 Annual Planning Summaries: 2014 February 19, 2014 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy The ongoing and projected...

27

2013 Annual Plan | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Annual Plan 2013 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Uncoventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program Report to Congress, June 2013 Section...

28

Annual Planning Summaries: 2013 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Annual Planning Summaries: 2013 March 25, 2013 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Thomas Jefferson Site Office 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Thomas Jefferson Site Office March 25, 2013 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Pacific Northwest Site Office 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Pacific Northwest Site Office March 25, 2013 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the New Brunswick Laboratory 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the New Brunswick Laboratory March 25, 2013 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve March 25, 2013 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center

29

Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 During Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, we reviewed a variety of critical areas relevant to the Department's mission priorities. One of our goals, for example, was to examine possible programmatic improvements in Department operations relating to cyber security and contract management. Overall, our efforts resulted in the issuance of over 70 audit and inspection reports containing recommendations for enhancing Departmental operations, with likely savings of over $7 million. Further as a result of our investigative efforts, we obtained 20 criminal convictions, recovered $22.8 million in

30

Integrated Planning and Performance Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

management systems need clarification - Consolidated planning annual timetable needed for efficiency * Organizational rolesresponsibilities need alignment to defined planning...

31

EIS-0380: Annual Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Los Alamos National Laboratory Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Fiscal Year 2013 Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report

32

Annual Planning Summaries: 2011 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Planning Summaries: 2011 Annual Planning Summaries: 2011 Annual Planning Summaries: 2011 January 20, 2011 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Chicago Operations Office (CH) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Chicago Operations Office (CH) (See Science APS). January 20, 2011 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Nevada Site Office (NSO) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Nevada Site Office (NSO). January 19, 2011 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Southeastern Power Administration (SEPA) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Southeastern Power Administration (SEPA).

33

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Sandia Site Office | Department...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

More Documents & Publications 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Los Alamos Site Office LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Nevada Site Office...

34

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Bonneville Power Administration...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

1 Annual Planning Summary for Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Annual Planning Summaries briefly...

35

GO 2009 Annual NEPA Planning Summary  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

2009 Annual National Environmental Policy Act Planning Summary for the U.S. Department of Energy's Golden Field Office (GO).

36

Annual Planning Summaries: 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Annual Planning Summaries: 2012 February 23, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Oak Ridge Office The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the Oak Ridge Office. February 8, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation. February 3, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Environmental Management The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within Environmental Management. February 2, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

37

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan Subject: Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG's FY 2009 actual performance and FY 2010 planned activities. Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan More Documents & Publications U.S. Departmetn of Energy, Office of Inspector General, Annaul Peformance Report FY 2009, Annual Performance Plan Fy 2010 Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Annual Performance Results and FY 2012

38

Section 999: Annual Plans | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Section 999: Annual Plans Section 999: Annual Plans Section 999: Annual Plans October 2, 2013 URTAC Meeting - October 2013 Federal Register Notice for October 10, 2013 URTAC Meeting The 24th Meeting of the Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee (URTAC), previously scheduled for October 10, 2013, is postponed until further notice due to a lapse in Federal funding. October 2, 2013 UDAC Meeting - October 2013 Federal Register Notice for October 8, 2013 UDAC Meeting The 24th Meeting of the Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee (UDAC), previously scheduled for October 8, 2013, is postponed until further notice due to a lapse in Federal funding. September 10, 2013 Draft 2014 Annual Plan Section 999: Draft 2014 Annual Plan July 8, 2013 2013 Annual Plan Section 999: 2013 Annual Plan

39

Annual Planning Summaries: 2010 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Annual Planning Summaries: 2010 February 24, 2010 2010 Annual Planning Summary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24 months, and the planned cost and schedule for each NEPA review identified. February 2, 2010 2010 Annual Planning Summary for Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24 months, and the planned cost and schedule for each NEPA review identified. February 1, 2010 2010 Annual Planning Summary for Oak Ridge (OR)

40

FY 2009 Annual Performance Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AnnuAl PerformAnce rePort Working to Save the Planet DOE/CF-0044 CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 Mission ...........................................................................................................................................2 Message from the Secretary ...........................................................................................................3 Performance Background...............................................................................................................5 High Priority Performance Goals ...................................................................................................7

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA HQ |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA HQ 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA HQ 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA HQ Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance. 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NA-SH

42

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA HQ |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA HQ Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA HQ 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA HQ Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance. 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NA-SH

43

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- NNSA HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

44

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- NNSA HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

45

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- NNSA HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

46

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- NNSA HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

47

Annual Planning Summaries: 2011 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Management). January 31, 2011 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Legacy Management (LM) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements...

48

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EM Consolidated  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM EM Consolidated Business Center 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EM Consolidated Business Center Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance. 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EMCBC

49

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Richland Operations Office 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance. 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - RL

50

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EM Consolidated  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM EM Consolidated Business Center 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EM Consolidated Business Center Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance. 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EMCBC

51

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EM Consolidated  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM EM Consolidated Business Center 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EM Consolidated Business Center Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance. 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EMCBC

52

2012 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

APS-2012-NE.xls More Documents & Publications 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the West Valley Demonstration Project 2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security...

53

2012 Annual Planning Summary for Nevada Site Office | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

APS-2012-NSO.xls More Documents & Publications 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the West Valley Demonstration Project 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Loan Program Office 2012...

54

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

3 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management 2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak Ridge Office of...

55

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak Ridge Office | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

3 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak Ridge Office 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak Ridge Office The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental...

56

2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak RIdge National Laboratory...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

4 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak RIdge National Laboratory Site Office 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak RIdge National Laboratory Site Office The Oak Ridge National...

57

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Environmental Management (EM...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

(EM) More Documents & Publications 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Bonneville Power Administration 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the West Valley Demonstration Project...

58

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Savannah River Operations...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

for Savannah River Operations Office 2010 Annual Planning Summary for Savannah River Operations Office (SRS) 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Bonneville Power Administration...

59

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Office...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Office of Science Chicago Office 2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Office of Science Chicago...

60

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Civilian Radioactive Waste Management...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (CRWM) 2010 Annual Planning Summary for Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (CRWM) Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance.

62

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific Northwest  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific 1 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific Northwest Site Office 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific Northwest Site Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance.

63

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific Northwest  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific 2 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific Northwest Site Office 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific Northwest Site Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance.

64

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific Northwest  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific 0 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific Northwest Site Office 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Pacific Northwest Site Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance.

65

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland 2 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Individual site summaries developed at the end of each year are a basis for DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel reporting to the Secretary of Energy summarizing DOE's federal technical capabilities for defense nuclear facility safety assurance.

66

DOE Annual NEPA Planning Summary report templates 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

or Field Organization " "Annual NEPA Planning Summary " "Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) Tracking" "National Nuclear Security Administration - Nevada Site Office" "application...

67

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EM HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13 13 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDMAN CHAIRPERSON FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL FROM: MATTHEW B. Mouf h i DEPUTY ASSISTANT SE ARY FOR SUBJECT: SAFETY, SECURITY, AND QUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Environmental Management The Office of Environmental Management performed a technical workforce analysis per Department of Energy Order 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Order, and your memorandum of October 24, 2012, "Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report of Calendar Year 2012." A summary report, using the template provided in your memorandum, is attached for Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) review and incorporation into the FTCP Annual Report to the Secretary of Energy.

68

FY 2009 Annual Performance Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Performance Reports » FY 2009 Annual Performance Annual Performance Reports » FY 2009 Annual Performance Report FY 2009 Annual Performance Report DOE's Annual Performance Report (APR) outlines the Department's performance in fiscal year 2009 against the goals that were set in the President's fiscal year 2009 budget. The performance measures discussed in this report were outlined in the Department's congressional budget justifications and carried through the actual execution of the budget during the fiscal year. Because these measures were created before final congressional allocations, in some cases the actual appropriation levels did not match the Department's request and may have affected a program's ability to meet its planned performance level. Performance information is also presented for projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

69

FY 2009 Annual Performance Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Performance Reports » FY 2009 Annual Performance Annual Performance Reports » FY 2009 Annual Performance Report FY 2009 Annual Performance Report DOE's Annual Performance Report (APR) outlines the Department's performance in fiscal year 2009 against the goals that were set in the President's fiscal year 2009 budget. The performance measures discussed in this report were outlined in the Department's congressional budget justifications and carried through the actual execution of the budget during the fiscal year. Because these measures were created before final congressional allocations, in some cases the actual appropriation levels did not match the Department's request and may have affected a program's ability to meet its planned performance level. Performance information is also presented for projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

70

FY 1999 annual work plan for infrastructure program WBS 6  

SciTech Connect

The Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 DynCorp Annual Work Plan (AWP) relates DOE-RL work breakdown structure (WBS) to Cost Accounts and to Organizational Structure. Each Cost Account includes a workscope narrative and justification performance and service standards, goals, and deliverables. Basis of estimates are included within each Cost Account to demonstrate the relationship of budget to defined workscope. The FY 1999 AWP reflects the planning assumptions and initiatives that are included in the PHMC Strategic Plan for Infrastructure Optimization which was established in FY 1998. Development of the FY 1999 AWP was in accordance with a sequential series of events and efforts described in the Infrastructure Annual Work Planning and Budget Cycle which was developed and established in conjunction with the Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan covers a rolling five year span of time and is updated at the start of each fiscal year as the beginning of the annual work planning and budget cycle for the following fiscal year. Accordingly the planning for the FY 1999 AWP began in January 1998. Also included in the annual work planning and budget cycle, and the basis for the budget in this AWP, is the development of a requirements-based budget.

Donley, C.D.

1998-08-27T23:59:59.000Z

71

Performance Confirmation Plan  

SciTech Connect

As described, the purpose of the Performance Confirmation Plan is to specify monitoring, testing, and analysis activities for evaluating the accuracy and adequacy of the information used to determine that performance objectives for postclosure will be met. This plan defines a number of specific performance confirmation activities and associated test concepts in support of the MGR that will be implemented to fulfill this purpose. In doing so, the plan defines an approach to identify key factors and processes, predict performance, establish tolerances and test criteria, collect data (through monitoring, testing, and experiments), analyze these data, and recommend appropriate action. The process of defining which factors to address under performance confirmation incorporates input from several areas. In all cases, key performance confirmation factors are those factors which are: (1) important to safety, (2) measurable and predictable, and (3) relevant to the program (i.e., a factor that i s affected by construction, emplacement, or is a time-dependent variable). For the present version of the plan, performance confirmation factors important to safety are identified using the principal factors from the RSS (CRWMS M and O 2000a) (which is derived from TSPA analyses) together with other available performance assessment analyses. With this basis, key performance confirmation factors have been identified, and test concepts and test descriptions have been developed in the plan. Other activities are also incorporated into the performance confirmation program outside of these key factors. Additional activities and tests have been incorporated when they are prescribed by requirements and regulations or are necessary to address data needs and model validation requirements relevant to postclosure safety. These other activities have been included with identified factors to construct the overall performance confirmation program.

Lindner, E.N.

2000-05-19T23:59:59.000Z

72

Environmental Planning and Ecology Program Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the Sandia National Laboratories, California (SNL/CA) Environmental Planning and Ecology Program for a given calendar year. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual. The program report describes the activities undertaken during the past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Planning and Ecology Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA.

Larsen, Barbara L.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

2012 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan 2012 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan The 2012 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan embodies DOE's...

74

Annual Operating Plan: FY 1991  

SciTech Connect

This is an internal DOE Geothermal Program planning and control document. Many of these reports were issued only in draft form.

None

1991-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

75

Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laws & Regulations » Facility Reporting » Federal Facility Annual Laws & Regulations » Facility Reporting » Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance October 8, 2013 - 2:09pm Addthis Agencies are required to report annual progress made toward energy- and water-reduction goals. Agencies are required to report annual progress made toward energy- and water-reduction goals. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers information and data sets illustrating Federal agencies' annual progress in meeting facility energy goals. Additional detail about each agency's performance can be found in their Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans on the Performance.Gov website. Federal Facility Efficiency Investment and Progress toward Sustainability Goals: Get an overview of Federal progress made in facility energy

76

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - LSO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REFRENCE: REFRENCE: U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office PO Box 808, L-293 7000 East Avenue Livermore, California 94551-0808 JAN 1 9 2011 ALICE C. WILLIAMS MANAGER 3250 COR-M0-12/2/2010-305229 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo (K. Boardman/Distribution), Annual Woriforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2010-10-NA SC-09, dated October 28, 2010 In accordance with the above reference, the Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Livermore Site Office (LSO) are attached. The analysis identified a gap of 2.0 FTE to perform the Federal Safety Assurance Program. Recruitment is in process for the Cyber Security vacancy and the second position shown as vacant will be modified upon approval of a

77

Annual wok plan for FY 1991  

SciTech Connect

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has an overall mission to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and mismanagement in Department of Energy (DOE) programs. As part of its responsibility in accomplishing its mission, the DOE Office of Audits publishes an Annual Work Plan'' in September of each year. The prime focus of the plan is to identify opportunities for audits to enhance the effectiveness, efficiency, and integrity of the DOE's programs and operations. Through this plan, we are able to maximize the effectiveness of our resources and to avoid duplicating audit coverage being provided by other audit groups, such as the US General Accounting Office (GAO) to US Department of Energy programs. This report covers the OIG annual work plan for fiscal year 1991. Major program areas are discussed individually.

Not Available

1990-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

78

2011 ANNUAL PLANNING SUMMARY FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH AND PROJECTS...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

PLANNING SUMMARY FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH AND PROJECTS AGENCY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION 2011 ANNUAL PLANNING SUMMARY FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH AND PROJECTS AGENCY WESTERN...

79

DOE Annual NEPA Planning Summary report templates 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Demonstration Project" "Annual NEPA Planning Summary " "Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) Tracking" "West Valley Demonstration Project" "applicationvnd.ms-excel" "NEPA Document...

80

Nevada Test Site Resource Management Plan: Annual summary, January 2000  

SciTech Connect

The Nevada Test Site Resource Management Plan published in December of 1998 (DOE/NV--518) describes the Nevada Test Site stewardship mission and how its accomplishment will preserve the resources of the ecoregion while accomplishing the objectives of the mission. As part of the Nevada Test Site Resource Management Plan, DOE Nevada Operations Office has committed to perform and publish an annual summary review of DOE Nevada Operations' stewardship of the Nevada Test Site. This annual summary includes a description of progress made toward the goals of the Nevada Test Site Resource Management Plan, pertinent monitoring data, actions that were taken to adapt to changing conditions, and any other changes to the Nevada Test Site Resource Management Plan.

NONE

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administrat...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration 2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and...

82

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2013 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN FYS 2014 & 2015 U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General Table of Contents Page Message from the Inspector General ii At a Glance: Performance Results for FY 2013 iii Overview 1 Our Organization 2 External Factors Challenging Our Organization 4 Our Management Challenges 5 Measuring Our FY 2013 Performance 6 Our FY 2014 and FY 2015 Performance Plan 15 Appendix A 18 Audit Work Plan for FY 2014 18 Inspection Work Plan for FY 2014 22 Appendix B 23 Investigative Work Plan for FY 2014 23 Annual Performance Report FY 2013 Annual Performance Plan FYs 2014 & 2015 Page i U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General Message from the Inspector General

83

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EM HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

KAREN L. BOARDMAN KAREN L. BOARDMAN CHAIRPERSON FROM: SUBJECT: FEDERAL TECHNICAL MATTHEW B. MOUR DEPUTY ASSISTANT S SAFETY AND SECUR Y PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Environmental Management The Office of Environmental Management performed a technical workforce analysis per DOE 0 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Order, and your memorandum of October 13 2011, "Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report of Calendar Year 2011." A summary report, using the template provided in your memorandum, is attached for Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) review and incorporation into the FTCP Annual Report to the Secretary of Energy. If you any questions, please contact me at (202) 586-5151.

84

Annual Performance Reports | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Performance Reports Performance Reports Annual Performance Reports The Annual Performance Report provides key performance information that demonstrates DOE's accountability to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental, and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions. These reports are produced as an alternative to the Performance and Accountability Report. Documents Available for Download February 1, 2012 FY 2011 Annual Performance Report Provides summary and detailed results associated with the Department's performance goals and associated annual targets that align with the budget activities. Also included are references to supporting documentation and the status of prior-year unmet measures. April 1, 2010

85

Annual Planning Summaries: Nevada Site Office (NSO) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Planning Summaries: Nevada Site Office (NSO) Annual Planning Summaries: Nevada Site Office (NSO) Annual Planning Summaries: Nevada Site Office (NSO) January 31, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Nevada Site Office The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the Nevada Site Office. January 20, 2011 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Nevada Site Office (NSO) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Nevada Site Office (NSO). January 14, 2010 2010 Annual Planning Summary for Nevada Site Office Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24 months, and the

86

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - LASO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REPLY TO REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: TO: NNSA/DOE -JAN 2 3 2012 Kevin W. Smith Los Alamos Site Office Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011 Karen Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel, HS-70, National Training Center Reference: 1. Memorandum, from Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel, for distribution, Subject: Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011, dated October 13, 2011. Attached please find the Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan for Calendar Year 2011. Authorized Federal Full Time Equivalent (FTE) allocation remains less than the number of FTEs required to perform the oversight identified necessary by the analysis results reported. Staffing shortfalls are compensated

87

State Employees PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND REVIEW (PPR) Form INSTRUCTIONS SHEET  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SF-15 Rev. 9/02 State Employees PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND REVIEW (PPR) Form INSTRUCTIONS SHEET the rest of the document after use. PLANNING SESSION: All classified employees (restricted, job appointment, provisional, probational, or permanent) MUST have a planning session annually. SUPERVISOR'S CHECKLIST

Kulp, Mark

88

2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan 2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan In the 2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan, DOE pledges to...

89

Annual work plan for FY 1990  

SciTech Connect

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has an overall mission to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and mismanagement in Department of Energy (DOE) programs. As part of its responsibility in accomplishing its mission, the DOE Office of Audits publishes an Annual Work Plan'' in September of each year. The prime focus of the plan is to identify opportunities for audits to enhance the effectiveness, efficiency, and integrity of the DOE's programs and operations. Through this plan, we are able to maximize the effectiveness of our resources and to avoid duplicating audit coverage being provided by other audit groups, such as the US General Accounting Office (GAO) to US Department of Energy programs. Such planning is required by Office of Management and Budget Circular A-73 and DOE Order 2321.1. This work plan, in an effort to more realistically plan the year ahead, moves away from the traditional listing of all audits to be undertaken for the year. Only those audits that are to be carried over from the previous fiscal year and those that are to be started in the first quarter of the new fiscal year will be listed. The balance of time available has been allocated to the major program areas for FY 1990, and new audits will be identified and started during the year based on the knowledge gained from completed or in-process audits. This process represents the beginning of our use of long-term multi-year program strategies.

Not Available

1989-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

90

FY 2008 Annual Performance Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hyd Hyd rog en Tan k Res earc h, LLN L PH EN IX Ex pe rim en t, BN L Fu el Ce ll Re sea rch , AN L Ca rb on Se qu es tra tio n Re se ar ch , PN NL Hi gh Ex pl os iv es Ap pl ic at io ns Fa ci lit y, LL NL Com put er Sim ulat ion The ater , LAN L Al ga e Re se ar ch , NR EL Ad va nc ed Bio fue ls Re se arc h, LB NL T ra in in g Nuc lear Mat eria ls Sto rag e, SRS C o a l G a s if ic a ti o n R e s e a rc h , P N N L Cli ma te Mo de lin g, OR NL AnnuAl PerformAnce rePort fY 2008 Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 Performance Summary Scorecard..................................................................................................2 Department Performance ...............................................................................................................4

91

Management and Performance PERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNING  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

AND PLANNING M&P-144 the Agency's workforce is well informed of major Agency initiatives and human capitalManagement and Performance PERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNING M&P-143 Strategic Goal 5: Enable.1: IDENTIFY, CULTIVATE, AND SUSTAIN A DIVERSE WORKFORCE AND INCLUSIVE WORK ENVIRONMENT THAT IS NEEDED

92

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - PPPO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report as of December 31, 2012 Reporting Office: Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Section 1: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes The PPPO mission is to effectively implement EM responsibilities, obligations and activities at the Department's Portsmouth, Ohio and Paducah, Kentucky, sites:  Accomplish environmental remediation actions in compliance with regulatory milestones and agreements.  Disposition legacy and newly generated waste.  Operations of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facilities at both sites.  Perform Decontamination and Decommissioning of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant The PPPO Manager serves as the line manager reporting to the Assistant Secretary for Environmental

93

NREL Annual Environmental Performance Reports (Annual Site Environmental Reports)  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Every year NREL prepares an Environmental Performance Report meeting the requirements of an Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER) per DOE Order 231.1B. The report is written to inform the public,...

94

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

95

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Pacific Northwest Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

96

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Science  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

97

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

98

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

99

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

100

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Sandia Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Idaho Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

102

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Oak Ridge Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

103

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Science  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

104

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

105

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

106

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Health, Safety and Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

107

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

108

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Idaho Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

109

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Pantex Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

110

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Health, Safety and Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

111

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

112

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

113

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Science Chicago Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

114

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

115

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Pacific Northwest Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

116

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

117

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Idaho Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

118

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

119

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Livermore Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

120

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Portsmouth Paducah Project Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Portsmouth Paducah Project Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

122

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- EM Consolidated Business Center  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

123

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Portsmouth Paducah Project Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

124

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Los Alamos Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

125

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

126

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Health, Safety and Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

127

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of River Protection  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

128

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Idaho Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

129

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

130

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

131

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- EM Consolidated Business Center  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

132

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of River Protection  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

133

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Nevada Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

anagers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

134

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Sandia Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

135

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Sandia Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

136

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Oak Ridge Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

137

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

138

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Pacific Northwest Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

139

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Sandia Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

140

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Y-12 Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Nevada Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

142

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of River Protection  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

143

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

144

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- West Valley Demonstration Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

145

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- NNSA Production Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

146

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

anagers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

147

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Nevada Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

148

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Oak Ridge Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

149

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Oak Ridge Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

150

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- NNSA Production Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

151

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Science  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

152

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

153

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Livermore Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

154

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

155

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Los Alamos Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

156

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Carlsbad Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

157

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Nevada Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

158

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Livermore Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

159

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- NNSA Production Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

160

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Science  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

162

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

163

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

164

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Livermore Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

165

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Livermore Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

166

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of River Protection  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

167

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

168

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

169

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

170

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Los Alamos Field Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

171

2012 Annual Planning Summary for Fossil Energy, National Energy...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

for Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, RMOTC, and Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Fossil Energy, National Energy...

172

2012 Annual Planning Summary for West Valley Demonstration Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

West Valley Demonstration Project 2012 Annual Planning Summary for West Valley Demonstration Project The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact...

173

2011 Annual Planning Summary for National Energy Technology Laboratory...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) 2011 Annual Planning Summary for National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and...

174

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Bonneville Power Administration...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Bonneville Power Administration. PMABPANEPA-APS-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications 2012 Annual Planning Summary for...

175

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Stanford Linear Accelerator...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Accelerator Center Site Office (SLAC) Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12...

176

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Savannah River Operations Office...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Savannah River Operations Office (SRS) Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12...

177

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Idaho Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 19~ 2012 Subject: Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011 (OS-DM-12-004) To: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson Federal Technical Capability Panel National Nuclear Security Administration Reference: Memorandum, Karen Boardman to Distribution, "Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011," dated October 13,2011 In accordance with direction in the reference, the Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) performed a workforce analysis and developed an Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Report. The Report is hereby submitted for the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) review and incorporation into the FTCP Annual Report to the Secretary.

178

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - LASO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Field Office Field Office Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544 DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: TO: NNSA/DOE JAN 2 8 2013 Juan L. Griego Los Alamos Field Office Work Force Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012 Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel, HS-50 Reference: 1. HS-50 Memorandum, from Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel, to Distribution, Subject: Annual Worlforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012, dated October 24, 2012 Attached please find the Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Work Force Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012. Authorized Full Time Equivalent (FTE) allocation remains less than the number of FTEs required to perform the oversight

179

SES Performance Management System Plan Training | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management System Plan Training SES Performance Management System Plan Training Overview of the DOE SES Performance Management System. Senior Executive Service Performance...

180

Annual Planning Summaries: Oak Ridge Office (OR) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge Office (OR) Oak Ridge Office (OR) Annual Planning Summaries: Oak Ridge Office (OR) Document(s) Available For Download February 23, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Oak Ridge Office The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the Oak Ridge Office. January 28, 2011 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Oak Ridge Operations Office (OR) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Oak Ridge Operations Office (OR) (See Environmental Management and Science). February 1, 2010 2010 Annual Planning Summary for Oak Ridge (OR) Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

EIS-0380: Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report EIS-0380: Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report Los Alamos National Laboratory Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Fiscal Year 2012 Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report In Fiscal Year (FY) 2012, the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (SWEIS) Project Office focused on tracking and managing mitigation action commitments and reporting. Highlights for FY 2012 include the following: completion and distribution of the FY 2011 SWEIS Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report (DOE 2012), which included a section for the Las Conchas Fire, completion and distribution of the calendar year (CY) 2010 SWEIS Yearbook in April 2012 (LANL 2012a), construction and operation of SERF-E, construction of an institutional

182

Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Support Contract FY15 Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan Printed on: December 30, 2014 Mission Support Contract Section J - November 2014 Contract No. DE-AC06-09RL14728...

183

2013 Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

2013 Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan, a report to the White House Council on Environmental Quality and Office of Management and Budget, June 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy.

184

2014 Annual Planning Summary for the NNSA Los Alamos Field Office...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

4 Annual Planning Summary for the NNSA Los Alamos Field Office 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the NNSA Los Alamos Field Office The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments...

185

Performance assurance program plan  

SciTech Connect

B and W Protec, Inc. (BWP) is responsible for implementing the Performance Assurance Program for the Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) in accordance with DOE Order 470.1, Safeguards and Security Program (DOE 1995a). The Performance Assurance Program applies to safeguards and security (SAS) systems and their essential components (equipment, hardware, administrative procedures, Protective Force personnel, and other personnel) in direct support of Category I and H special nuclear material (SNM) protection. Performance assurance includes several Hanford Site activities that conduct performance, acceptance, operability, effectiveness, and validation tests. These activities encompass areas of training, exercises, quality assurance, conduct of operations, total quality management, self assessment, classified matter protection and control, emergency preparedness, and corrective actions tracking and trending. The objective of the Performance Assurance Program is to capture the critical data of the tests, training, etc., in a cost-effective, manageable program that reflects the overall effectiveness of the program while minimizing operational impacts. To aid in achieving this objective, BWP will coordinate the Performance Assurance Program for Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. (FDH) and serve as the central point for data collection.

Rogers, B.H.

1997-11-06T23:59:59.000Z

186

How to complete an Annual Review of your UC Ready Continuity Plan The campus recommends that departmental continuity plans be reviewed and updated annually.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

How to complete an Annual Review of your UC Ready Continuity Plan The campus recommends that departmental continuity plans be reviewed and updated annually. The annual review process is straightforward plan is up-to-date, click this tab and mark your annual review complete by entering the requested

Walker, Matthew P.

187

Annual Planning Summaries By Office | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Planning Summaries By Office Annual Planning Summaries By Office Annual Planning Summaries By Office SECRETARIAL OFFICES Advanced Research and Projects Agency (ARPA-E) Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EE) Environmental Management (EM) Fossil Energy (FE) Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Intelligence and Counterintelligence (IN) Legacy Management (LM) Loan Programs Office (LPO) Nuclear Energy (NE) Science (SC) POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Southeastern Power Administration (SEPA) Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA) Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) DOE FIELD OFFICES Ames Site Office (ASO) Argonne Site Office (See SC APS) Berkeley Site Office (BSO) Brookhaven Site Office (BHSO) (See SC APS)

188

Microsoft Word - 2014 Annual Plan DRAFT 9-5-13  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 Annual Plan 4 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program Report to Congress Draft September 2013 United States Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Department of Energy |Draft September 2013 Department of Energy |Draft September 2013 Executive Summary This 2014 Annual Plan is the eighth research plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research Program since the launch of the program in 2007. This plan reflects the program's focus on safety and environmental sustainability that was initiated in the 2013 plan, and is consistent with the President's Office of Management and Budget directive for research that has significant potential public benefits.

189

2010 Annual Planning Summary for National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

190

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Idaho Operations Office (ID)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

191

2010 Annual Planning Summary Livermore Site Office (LSO)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

192

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (CRWM)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

193

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Nevada Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

194

2012 Annual Planning Summary for Bonneville Power Administration...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within Bonneville Power Administration. APS-2012-BPA.pdf APS-2012-BPA.xls More Documents & Publications 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the...

195

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Intelligence and Counterintelligence (IN)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

196

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Argonne Site Office (Argonne)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

197

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (NA-20)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

198

SUMMARY ANNUAL REPORT For LANS Welfare Benefit Plan for Employees  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the annual report at the main office of the plan (Los Alamos National Security, LLC, Bikini Atoll Road, MS SM30, Los Alamos, NM 87545) and at the U.S. Department of Labor in...

199

FY 2007 Annual Performance Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Focuses on detailed performance information including performance targets associated with the Departments budget activities. The report discusses individual and summary performance measure results through narrative descriptions with references to supporting documentation, a concise statement on highlevel program challenges and benefits, and the status of all FY 2006 unmet measures.

200

Fuel Performance Annual Report for 1980  

SciTech Connect

This annual report, the third in a series, provides a brief description of fuel performance in conmercial nuclear power plants. Brief summaries of fuel surveillance programs and operating experience, fuel performance problems, and fuel design changes are provided. References to additional, more detailed, information and related NRC evaluation are included.

Bailey, W. J.; Rising, K. H.; Tokar, M.

1981-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

FY 2010 Annual Performance Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 C C O O N N T T E E N N T T S S Message from the Secretary ...........................................................................................................1 Mission, Priorities, and Principles .................................................................................................2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................3 Performance Background...............................................................................................................4 Program Evaluation .......................................................................................................................6 Performance by Secretarial Priority .............................................................................................10

202

Performance Demonstration Program Management Plan  

SciTech Connect

To demonstrate compliance with the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) waste characterization program, each testing and analytical facility performing waste characterization activities participates in the Performance Demonstration Program (PDP). The PDP serves as a quality control check against expected results and provides information about the quality of data generated in the characterization of waste destined for WIPP. Single blind audit samples are prepared and distributed by an independent organization to each of the facilities participating in the PDP. There are three elements within the PDP: analysis of simulated headspace gases, analysis of solids for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) constituents, and analysis for transuranic (TRU) radionuclides using nondestructive assay (NDA) techniques. Because the analysis for TRU radionuclides using NDA techniques involves both the counting of drums and standard waste boxes, four PDP plans are required to describe the activities of the three PDP elements. In accordance with these PDP plans, the reviewing and approving authority for PDP results and for the overall program is the CBFO PDP Appointee. The CBFO PDP Appointee is responsible for ensuring the implementation of each of these plans by concurring with the designation of the Program Coordinator and by providing technical oversight and coordination for the program. The Program Coordinator will designate the PDP Manager, who will coordinate the three elements of the PDP. The purpose of this management plan is to identify how the requirements applicable to the PDP are implemented during the management and coordination of PDP activities. The other participants in the program (organizations that perform site implementation and activities under CBFO contracts or interoffice work orders) are not covered under this management plan. Those activities are governed by the organizations quality assurance (QA) program and procedures or as otherwise directed by CBFO.

Carlsbad Field Office

2005-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

E-Print Network 3.0 - action plan annual Sample Search Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Unless Noted Otherwise) Reviewed By Mechanism & Frequency For Review Action... Annual Mtg. (October) Annual Retreat (August) CI Plan Faculty Professional Development...

204

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - ORP  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy memorandum Richland Operations Office DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: TO: JAN 1 9 2011 ENS :JHW 11-ENS-OO 1 THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION (ORP) ANNUAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS AND STAFFING PLAN REPORT Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Reference: Memorandum from K. L. Boardman to Distribution, "Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2010 - 10-NA SC-09," dated October 28, 2010. As requested in the Reference, the attached is ORP's Calendar Year (CY) 2010 annual workforce analysis and staffing plan that identify technical capabilities and positions ORP needs to ensure safe operations of ORP assigned defense nuclear facilities. This report is

205

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - ORP  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE: DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: TO: JAN 1 3 201?. ENS:JHW 12-ENS-0001 THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION (ORP) ANNUAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS AND STAFFING PLAN REPORT Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Reference: Memorandum from K. L. Boardman to Distribution, "Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011," dated October 13, 2011. In response to your memorandum dated October 13, 2011, attached is the ORP Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year (CY) 2011. The subject report was prepared in accordance with your guidance and represents the necessary resources required to provide oversight and ensure safe operations of ORP' s assigned nuclear facilities.

206

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - HSS HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDMAN CHAIRPERSON FROM: SUBJECT: FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PA~EL (FTCP) PATRICIA R. WORTHINGTON, Ph~ 1 ~ DIRECTOR '- OFFICE OF HEALTH AND SAFETY OFFICE OF HEALTH, SAFETY AND SECURITY Office of Health, Safety and Security Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011 In accordance with the guidance memo of October 13, 2011, the Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), is attached. If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 903-5926 or the HSS Alternate FTCP Agent, Bradley K. Davy, at (301) 903-2473. Attachment @ Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report as of December 31, 2011

207

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak Ridge  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25, 2012 25, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDMAN FROM: SUBJECT: CHAIR, FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL JOHN R. ESCHENBERG ~'c:::::~~:-cl~ ACTING MANAGER ANNUAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS AND STAFFING PLAN REPORT- CALENDAR YEAR 2011 In accordance with DOE 0 426.1, Federal Technical Capability, I am pleased to provide you with the Oak Ridge Official Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for calendar year 2011. The analysis follows the Federal Technical Capability Panel guidance. Should you have questions regarding this report, please feel free to contact me at (865) 576-4444 or Larry Kelly at (865) 576-4442. Attachment: 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Federal Technical Personnel cc w/attachment: Larry Kelly, M-2, ORO

208

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - HSS HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2013 3, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDMAN CHAIRPERSON FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL (FTCP) FROM: PATRICIA R. WORTHINGTON, Phrf'\vJ DIRECTOR ~ SUBJECT: OFFICE OF HEALTH AND SAFETY OFFICE OF HEALTH, SAFETY AND SECURITY Office of Health, Safety and Security Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012 In accordance with the guidance memo of October 24, 2012, the Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), is attached. If you have any questions, please call me at (30 I) 903-5926. Attachment @ Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report as of December 31, 2012 Reporting Office: Office of Health, Safety and Security

209

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - ORP  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

JAN 1 7·2013 JAN 1 7·2013 DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: TRS:JHW 13-TRS-0003 susJECT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION (ORP) ANNUAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS AND STAFFING PLAN REPORT TO: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Reference: Memorandum from K. L. Boardman to Distribution, "Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012," dated October 24, 2012. As required by DOE 0 426.1, Change 1, "Federal Technical Capability," and the Reference, attached is the ORP's Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year (CY) 2012. The subject report was prepared in accordance with the reference's guidance and represents the necessary technical resources required to provide oversight of

210

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Idaho Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2013 4, 2013 Subject: Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012 (EM-NSPD-13-003) To: Karen L. Boardman, Chairman Federal Technical Capability Panel National Nuclear Security Administration Reference: Memorandum, Karen Boardman to Distribution, "Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012," dated October 24, 2012 In accordance with direction in the reference, the Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) performed a workforce analysis and developed an Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Report. The Report is herby submitted for the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) review and incorporation into the FTCP Annual Report to the Secretary. Questions may be addressed to the DOE-ID FTCP Agent, Mark C. Brown at (208) 526-

211

ANNUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT PLAN UPDATE FOR DISABLED VETERANS  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). In FY 2013, DOE released an updated of the "Department of Energy Operational Plan and Desktop Reference...

212

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2003 Annual Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2003 Annual Plan Washington, D.C. 20585 September 2002 FTCP FY 2003 Annual Action Plan INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) provides management direction to assist the Federal workforce in maintaining necessary technical competencies to safely operate its defense nuclear facilities. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (Panel) consists of senior technical safety managers representing nuclear facilities, and reports to the Deputy Secretary for workforce safety technical capabilities' matters. The Panel will continue to pursue progress in the following areas: 1. Continued development of senior management commitment and support for the technical intern

213

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2004 Annual Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Technical Capalbility Program Federal Technical Capalbility Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 Annual Plan November 20,2003 FTCP Annual Plan. FY 2004 INTRODUCTION The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program (Program) is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The current Program was formalized in 1998 through Department directives DOE P 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Program for Defense Nuclear Facilities, and DOE M 426. l-l, Federal Technical Capability Manual. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) provides leadership in implementing the Program. The FTCP consists of senior technical safety managers representing nuclear facilities,

214

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2005 Annual Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Technical Capability Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Annual Plan January 15, 2005 FTCP Annual Plan, FY 2005 INTRODUCTION The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program (Program) is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the U.S. Department of Energy (also known as the "Department" or DOE) missions and responsibilities. The current Program was formalized in 1998 through Department directives DOE Policy 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Program for Defense Nuclear Facilities, and DOE Manual (M) 426.1-1A, Federal Technical Capability Manual. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) provides leadership in implementing the

215

Fuel performance: Annual report for 1987  

SciTech Connect

This annual report, the tenth in a series, provides a brief description of fuel performance during 1987 in commercial nuclear power plants and an indication of trends. Brief summaries of fuel design changes, fuel surveillance programs, fuel operating experience, fuel problems, high-burnup fuel experience, and items of general significance are provided. References to more detailed information and related US Nuclear Regulator Commission evaluations are included. 384 refs., 13 figs., 33 tabs.

Bailey, W.J.; Wu, S.

1989-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

216

Fuel performance annual report for 1985  

SciTech Connect

This annual report, the eighth in a series, provides a brief description of fuel performance during 1985 in commercial nuclear power plants and an indication of trends. Brief summaries of fuel design changes, fuel surveillance programs, fuel operating experience, fuel problems, high-burnup fuel experience, and items of general significance are provided. References to additional, more detailed information and related NRC evaluations are included.

Bailey, W.J.; Wu, S.

1987-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

217

Fuel performance annual report for 1986  

SciTech Connect

This annual report, the ninth in a series, provides a brief description of fuel performance during 1986 in commercial nuclear power plants and an indication of trends. Brief summaries of fuel design changes, fuel surveillance programs, fuel operating experience, fuel problems, high-burnup fuel experience, and items of general significance are provided. References to more detailed information and related U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission evaluations are included. 550 refs., 12 figs., 31 tabs.

Bailey, W.J.; Wu, S.

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

Fuel performance annual report for 1989  

SciTech Connect

This annual report, the twelfth in a series, provides a brief description of fuel performance during 1989 in commercial nuclear power plants and an indication of trends. Brief summaries of fuel design changes, fuel surveillance programs, fuel operating experience, fuel problems, high-burnup fuel experience, and items of general significance are provided. References to more detailed information and related US Nuclear Regulatory Commission evaluations are included.

Bailey, W.J.; Berting, F.M. (Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)); Wu, S. (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States). Div. of Systems Technology)

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

219

Fuel performance annual report for 1988  

SciTech Connect

This annual report, the eleventh in a series, provides a brief description of fuel performance during 1988 in commercial nuclear power plants and an indication of trends. Brief summaries of fuel design changes, fuel surveillance programs, fuel operating experience, fuel problems, high-burnup fuel experience, and items of general significance are provided. References to more detailed information and related US Nuclear Regulatory Commission evaluations are included. 414 refs., 13 figs., 32 tabs.

Bailey, W.J. (Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (USA)); Wu, S. (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (USA). Div. of Engineering and Systems Technology)

1990-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

220

Designing and Implementing Effective Performance Assurance Plans...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

performance assurance planning and process, including performance-based contracts, and measurement and verification protocols. fupwgfall12anderson.pdf More Documents &...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - SR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OOEF Jl2$U OOEF Jl2$U United States Government Department of Energy (DOE) memorandum Savannah River Operations Office (SR) DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: JAN 2 6 2011 MGR (Moody/(803) 952-9468) Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2010- 10-NA SC-09 TO: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel The Calendar Year 2010 DOE-SR Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report is attached. This analysis was conducted in conjunction with the development of the DOE-SR 5-Year Workforce Management Plan. If you have any questions, please contact me or have your staff contact Mr. Edgar Gates at 803-952-9227 or Mr. Lee Moody at 803-952-5978. MGR:LHM:bcp OHCM-11-1053 Attachment: DOE-SR Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report

222

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - SR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lllS.81 lllS.81 United States Government Department of Energy (DOE\ memorandum Savannah River Operations Office (SR) DATE: REPLY TO ATINOF: FEB 132811: MGR (Moody/(803) 952-9468) SUBJECT: Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012 To: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel The Calendar Year 2012 DOE-SR Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report is attached. This analysis was conducted in conjunction with the development of the DOE-SR 5-Y ear Workforce Management Plan. If you have any questions, please contact me or have your staff contact Mr. Edgar Gates at 803-952-9227 or Mrs. Deanna Yates at 803-952-6925. MGR:EG:lec OHCM-13-0025 Attachment: DOE-SR Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report

223

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - SR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

# # United States Government Department of Energy (DOE) memorandum Savannah River Operations Office (SR) DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: JAN 2 O 2012 MGR (Moody/(803) 952-9468) Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011 - 10-NA SC-09 TO: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel The Calendar Year 2011 DOE-SR Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report is attached. This analysis was conducted in conjunction with the development of the DOE-SR 5-Year Workforce Management Plan. If you have any questions, please contact me or have your staff contact Mr. Edgar Gates at 803-952-9227 or Mr. Lee Moody at 803-952-5978. MGR:EG:bcp OHCM-12-1035 Attachment: DOE-SR Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report

224

Annual update for the Nevada Test Site site treatment plan  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the purpose and scope of the Draft Annual Update for the Nevada Test Site Treatment Plan, the framework for developing the Annual Update, and the current inventory of mixed waste covered under the Site Treatment Plan and the Federal Facility Compliance Act Consent Order and stored at the Nevada Test Site. No Site Treatment Plan milestones or Federal Facility Cleanup Act Consent Order deadlines have been missed for fiscal year 1996. The Shipping Cask, a portion of the solvent sludge waste stream, and eight B-25 boxes from the lead-contaminated soil waste stream have been deleted from the Site Treatment Plan and the Federal Facility Cleanup Act Consent Order, in accordance with Part XI of the Federal Facility Cleanup Act Consent Order.

NONE

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

225

FY 2011 Annual Performance Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Report DOE's FY 2011 Annual Performance Report (APR) presents the performance results for fiscal year 2011 that contributed to the achievement of goals identified in the President's fiscal year 2011 budget. The performance measures in this report were initially outlined in the Department's FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request. After final congressional budget negotiations, some performance targets were revised to reflect changes in funding levels in enacted appropriations. DOE's FY 2011 Summary Report provides highlights of key financial and performance information that demonstrates DOE's accountability to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy,

226

Manual of Administrative Policies and Procedures Policy 6.4 Performance Plan and Review -Procedures  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Manual of Administrative Policies and Procedures Policy 6.4 ­ Performance Plan and Review. Issues Relating to Performance Plan and Review a) When a staff member has concerns or issues relating and outcomes; ii) Interim review of outcomes; iii) Annual performance dialogue and goal setting b) Human

Lennard, William N.

227

2008 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program 2008 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and...

228

2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program 2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and...

229

FY 2011 Annual Performance Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Annual Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Report DOE's FY 2011 Annual Performance Report (APR) presents the performance results for fiscal year 2011 that contributed to the achievement of goals identified in the President's fiscal year 2011 budget. The performance measures in this report were initially outlined in the Department's FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request. After final congressional budget negotiations, some performance targets were revised to reflect changes in funding levels in enacted appropriations. DOE's FY 2011 Summary Report provides highlights of key financial and performance information that demonstrates DOE's accountability to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy,

230

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Sandia  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0. Box 5400 0. Box 5400 Albuquerque, NM 87185 JAi 22 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability FROM: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: Panel, NNSA/NTC, HS-70 ~ ~,, / 2 ~~ ~;---~/?;;;:> e · . eauso~~ager Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for 2012 Boardman memorandum dated October 24, 2012; Subject: Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012 Attached is the Sandia Site Office workforce analysis and staffing plan, developed in accordance with the guidance provided in the referenced memorandum. If you have 1questions please contact me at (505) 845-6036 or James Todd, Assistant Manager for Nuclear Operations, at (505) 284-6668. Attachment cc w/attachment:

231

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Sandia  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

P.O. Box 5400 P.O. Box 5400 Albuquerque, NM 87185 JAN 2 fl ?.012 MEMORANDUM FOR: Karen Boardman, Chairperson Federal Technical Capability Panel FROM: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: PattyWagner ()~-'\-."~~ ... """ Manager '·~ ·'i \J ~ ,~ ....... Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for 2011 Boardman Memorandum Dated: October 13, 2011, Subject: Annual Worliforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011 The Sandia Site Office (SSO) has completed the workforce analysis and developed a staffing plan in accordance with the guidance provided in the referenced memorandum. The SSO report is attached. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (505) 845-6036 or Jim Todd of my staff at (505) 284-6668.

232

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Sandia  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

O. Box 5400 O. Box 5400 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-5400 JAN 2 4 2011 * MEMORANDUM FOR: Karen Boardman, Chairperson, Office of the Director Federal Technical Capability Panel FROM: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: Patty Wagner, Manager ·~~ ~ Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for 2010 Boardman/Distribution List memorandum dated October 28, 2010; Subject: "Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2010-10-NA SC-09" We have completed our workforce analysis and developed our staffing plan in accordance with the guidance provided in the referenced memorandum. Our report is attached. Please note that the Sandia Site Office is continuing the transition to a different process of oversight management during 2011. These changes will continue to affect our staffing

233

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - PXSO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Karen L. Boardman, Federal Technical Capability Panel Chairperson Karen L. Boardman, Federal Technical Capability Panel Chairperson FROM: Geoffrey L. Beausoleil, Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Agent SUBJECT: Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011 Reference: Memorandum from Boardman to Distribution, Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011, dated October 28,2010. Attached are the requested Calendar Year (CY) 2011 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Pantex Site Office (PXSO). Last year, PXSO was successful in hiring an emergency management and safeguards and security subject matter experts. This year, the PXSO staffing analysis indicates that the need to fill the following job functions: Safeguards & Security, Quality Assurance/Training

234

2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural 2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program 2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program 2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas Annual report on ultra-deepwater natural gas, etc, required by Energy Policy Act of 2005, Subtitle J, Section 999 2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program More Documents & Publications 2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program 2007 Annual Plan

235

2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural 7 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program 2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program Annual report on ultra-deepwater, etc. natural gas research program required by Energy Policy Act of 2005, Subtitle J, Section 999 2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program More Documents & Publications 2007 Annual Plan Recommendations: Draft 2008 Section 999 Annual Plan 2008 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program

236

H.__ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT PLAN  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT PLAN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT PLAN (a) The determination of performance-based fee earned shall be based upon a Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan (PEMP), which includes the performance criteria for earning performance-based fee and the distribution of performance-based fee as provided in paragraph (d) below. The PEMP will be unilaterally established by the Government. A copy of the plan shall be provided to the Contractor with approval of the Contract Baseline. Both the PEMP and the approved Contract Baseline are hereby incorporated by reference. (b) Key performance commitments proposed by the Contractor and accepted by the Government are incorporated into Section H clause entitled "Performance Requirements" and will be included in the performance criteria in the PEMP.

237

NREL Annual Environmental Performance Reports (Annual Site Environment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report meeting the requirements of an Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER) per DOE Order 231.1B. The report is written to inform the public, regulators, and other...

238

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Carlsbad  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Government Department of Energy memorandum Carlsbad Field Office Carlsbad , New Mexico 88221 DATE: REPLY TO ATINOF: SUBJECT: JAN 1 8 2013 CBFO:OESH:GTB:ANC:13-0701 :UFC 3410.00 CBFO Annual Workforce Analys is and Staffing Plan rn: Kare n L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Techn ical Capability Panel (HS-70) The Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) has updated the CBFO Annual Workforce Ana lysis and Staffing Plan as of December 31, 2012. The attachment to this Memorandum provides the updated CBFO Workforce Analysis and Staffing information on th e Federal Technica l Capability Program Workforce Staffing and Analys is Report template. If you have questions, please contact Mr. George T. Basabilvazo, CBFO Federal Technical Capability Panel Agent, at (575) 234-7488.

239

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Carlsbad  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Government United States Government Department of Energy memorandum Carlsbad Field Office Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221 DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: January 19, 2012 CBFO:OOM:GTB:MAG:12-1801 :UFC 3410.00 CBFO Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan ro: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel (HS-70) The Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) has updated the CBFO Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan as of December 31, 2011. The attachment to this Memorandum provides the updated CBFO Workforce Analysis and Staffing information on the Federal Technical Capability Program Workforce Staffing and Analysis Report template. If you have questions, please contact Mr. George T. Basabilvazo, CBFO Federal Technical Capability Panel Agent, at (575) 234-7488.

240

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak Ridge  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 9, 2011 February 9, 2011 FROM: SUBJECT: In accordance with DOE 0426.1, Federal Technical Capability, I am pleased to provide you with the Oak Ridge Office Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffmg Plan Report for Calendar Year 2010. The analysis follows the Federal Technical Capability Panel guidance. Should you have questions regarding this report, please feel free to contact me at (865) 576-4444 or Larry Kelly at (865) 576-0891. Attachment: 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Federal Technical Personnel cc w/attachment: R.J. Brown, M-2, ORO Susan Cange, NS-50, ORO Pauline Douglas, OS-20, ORO John Eschenberg, EM-90, ORO Larry Kelly, SE-30, ORO Johnny Moore, SC-IO, ORO John Shewairy, AD-40, ORO Patricia Howse-Smith, AD-44, ORO Butch Brant, AD-443, ORO

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Comprehensive Annual Energy Data and Sustainability Performance...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

15852); and Executive Order 13514. This data is compiled from agencies' FY 2013 Annual GHG and Sustainability Data Reports and will be included in the FY 2013 Annual Report to...

242

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - PNSO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Energy of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office P.O. Box 350, K9-42 Richland, Washington 99352 13-PNSO-0073 JAN 07 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDMAN, CHAIRPERSON FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER, HS-50 FROM: SUBJECT: ROGER E. SNYD MANAGER " C ANALYSIS AND STAFFING PLAN REPORT FOR CY 2012 PACIFIC NORTHWEST SITE OFFICE In response to your memorandum dated October 24, 2012, attached is the Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for CY 2012. The subject

243

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6.W~~l 6.W~~l #II VA. 'lf,fi:'¥Ylj Nsffonal Nuclear Security Admfnfat111tlon Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office PO Box 808, L-293 7000 East Avenue Livermore, California 94551-0808 !JAN 18 2013 3250 COR-M0-1/17/2013-490077 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDMAN CHAIRPERSON FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL FROM: v KIMBERLY DAVIS LEBAK "/'JJ. f /ti/ MANAGER ~ ..--r; tV[ SUBJECT: REFRENCE: Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Livermore Field Office 2012, Revision I Memorandum (K. Boardman/Distribution), Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012, dated October 24, 2012 Please see the attached revised Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Livermore

244

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - YSO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10100) 10100) United States Government Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration memorandum DATE: January 19, 2011 REPLY TO ATTN OF Y12-40:Sundie SUBJECT STAFFING PLAN FOR THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Y-12 SITE OFFICE TO: Karen Boardman, Chairman, Federal Technical Capability Panel, National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center, ABQ Reference: Memorandum from Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel to Agents, Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year (CY) 2010, dated October 28,2010 We have completed our analysis of staffing needs per the guidance in the referenced memorandum. Our revised staffing plan for the YSO is attached. Should you have any questions, please contact Terry Olberding at (865) 576-2550.

245

FY 2010 Annual Performance Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Performance Reports » FY 2010 Annual Performance Performance Reports » FY 2010 Annual Performance Report FY 2010 Annual Performance Report Department of Energy's Annual Performance Report (APR) compares the Department's performance results for fiscal year 2010 with goals set in the President's fiscal year 2010 budget. The performance measures discussed in this report were outlined in the Department's congressional budget justifications and carried through the actual execution of the budget during the fiscal year. Performance information is also presented for projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Provides key performance information that demonstrates DOE's accountability to the American people for discovering the solutions to power and secure America's future. Documents for Download

246

24th AESOP Annual Conference, Finland, 7 10 July 2010 Track 3: Planning Education  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

24th AESOP Annual Conference, Finland, 7 ­ 10 July 2010 Track 3: Planning Education A European Author manuscript, published in "Space is luxury (AESOP 2010), Helsinki : Finland (2010)" #12;24th AESOP Annual Conference, Finland, 7 ­ 10 July 2010 Track 3: Planning Education Over the years, planning

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

247

Annual Performance Report -2010 Water Use Efficiency  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Consumption (AC) ­ Annual Volume 459,480,000Total Water Produced and Purchased (TP) ­ Annual Volume listed above, WSU total water produced was 459.5 million gallons which is 101.5 million gallons less than.2% of water produced. Customer (Demand Side) Goal Progress: Additional Information Regarding Supply and Demand

Collins, Gary S.

248

Microsoft Word - 2010 Annual Plan - 12-3-09 - OMB Cleared-glc tables.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) - 2010 Annual Plan 163 EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) - 2010 Annual Plan 163 December 2009 EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) - 2010 Annual Plan 164 December 2009 EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) - 2010 Annual Plan 165 December 2009 Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee Comments and Recommendations 2010 Annual Plan OCTOBER 2009 Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee Report EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) - 2010 Annual Plan 166 December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................3 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION HIGHLIGHTS......................5

249

DOE Annual NEPA Planning Summary report templates 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

spreadsheet headings to include the name of the program office or field organization." spreadsheet headings to include the name of the program office or field organization." "Updated 2013 APS templates (December 2012)" "Annual NEPA Planning Summary " "Environmental Assessments Ongoing or Expected to be Prepared in the Next 12 Months" "Enter the name of the reporting organization here: Program Office or Field Organization" "Enter APS report date here" "Title, Location, Document Number","Reserved For GC use","Estimated Cost","Estimated Schedule (NEPA Milestones)",,"Description (including indications of cancelled documents)" ,,,"EA Determination Date:" ,,,"Transmittal to State:" ,,,"EA Approval:"

250

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA SC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1 1 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Draft as of December 31, 2010 Reporting Office: NNSA SC (NZ) Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes NNSA Mission: To strengthen United States security through the military application of nuclear energy and by reducing the global threat from terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. NNSA Vision: To be an integrated nuclear security enterprise operating an efficient and agile nuclear weapons complex, recognized as preeminent in technical leadership and program management. NNSA Service Center Mission: Provide responsive business, technical, financial, legal, and management advice and services to successfully accomplish the NNSA mission. NNSA Service Center Vision:

251

Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency Actions To Assist Historically Black Colleges And Universities Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency Actions To Assist Historically Black Colleges And Universities Packet of information to the Secretary of Education Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency Actions To Assist Historically Black Colleges And Universities More Documents & Publications Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs): Bridging the Gap between Federal Agencies and MSIs Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) -Historically Black Colleges and Universities 12 Annual Small Business Conference & Expo Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs)-Bridging the Gap Between Federal Agencies and MSIs

252

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - PNSO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

E E ^ ^ Department of Energy % fS, sg r/ Pacific Northwest Site Office / %1 ^ P.O.Box350,K9-42 #* » . c: ^ % ^ Richland, Washington 99352 .r ^ 3DEC 8 2010 ll-PNSO-0090 MEMORANDUM FORK. L. BOARDMAN, CHAIRPERSON i FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL WEI^ i it / la FROM: MICHAEL J. MANAGER SUBJECT: ANALYSIS AND STAFFING PLAN REPORT FOR CY 2010 PACIFIC NORTHWEST SITE OFFICE In response to your memorandum dated October 28, 2010, attached is the Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for CY 2010. The subject report was prepared in accordance with your guidance and represents the necessary resources required to provide oversight of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Defense Nuclear Facility known as Hanford Building 325. If you have any questions, please contact me, or you may also contact Roger Christensen, PNSO

253

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - SC HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585 MEMORANDUM TO KAREN L. BOARDMAN CHAIRPERSON FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAP ABILITY PANEL FROM: 1osEPH A. MCBREA a wi.~ '/t'f // c. DEPUTY DIRECT FOR FIELD OPE~ TIONS OFFICE OF SCIE CE SUBJECT: Annual Workforce Ail ysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012 In response to your memo dated October 24, 2012, enclosed is the Office of Science (SC) Headquarters Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012. The subject report was prepared in accordance with your guidance and represents the necessary resources required to provide oversight of Building 325 at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, the only defense nuclear facility overseen by SC-Headquarters. If you have any questions, please contact me, or you may contact Carol Sohn at

254

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - SC HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Deputy Director for Field Operations Deputy Director for Field Operations Office of Science Washington, DC 20585 December 15, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDMAN, CHAIR FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL I tlVM £]{ -.,;A 1 i-f:..-f'l FROM: JOSEPH A. MCBREARTY' ,____.- ~ SUBJECT: DEPUTY DIRECTOR F Fl D OPERATIONS Annual Workforce Ana ysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011 In response to your memo dated October 13, 2011, enclosed is the Office of Science (SC) Headquarters Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011. The subject report was prepared in accordance with your guidance and represents the necessary resources required to provide oversight of Building 325 at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, the only defense nuclear facility overseen by

255

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - PNSO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-PNS0-0071 -PNS0-0071 Department of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office P.O. Box 350, K9-42 Richland, Washington 99352 DEC 1 6 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDMAN, CHAIRPERSON FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAP ABILITY PANEL FROM: SUBJECT: ANALYSIS AND STAFFIN PLAN REPORT FOR CY 2011 - PACIFIC NORTHWEST SITE OFFICE (PNSO) In response to your memorandum dated October 13, 2011, attached is the PNSO Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for CY 2011. The subject report was prepared in accordance with your guidance and represents the necessary resources required to provide oversight of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Defense Nuclear Facility known as Hanford Building 325. If you have any questions, please contact me, or your staff may contact Ted Pietrok, FTCP

256

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - SC HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Off ice of Science Off ice of Science Washington, DC 20585 December 15, 2010 MEMORANDUM TO KAREN L. BOARDMAN CHAIRPERSON FROM: SUBJECT: FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAP ABILITY PANEL Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 20 l 0 In response to your memo dated October 28, 2010, enclosed is the Office of Science (SC) Headquarters Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2010. The subject report was prepared in accordance with your guidance and represents the necessary resources required to provide oversight of Building 325 at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, the only defense nuclear facility overseen by SC-Headquarters. If you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact Carol Sohn at carol.sohn@pnso.science.doe.gov or (509) 375-2320.

257

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EM CBC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FEB 6 FEB 6 REPLY IO ATTN OF: EMCBC:MARCUS EMCBC-00296-13 sus1Ecr: ANNUAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS AND STAFFING PLAN REPORTS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2012 IO: Karen Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit the requested Analysis and Staffing Plans per the memorandum dated October 24, 2012 with the same Subject. The Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center (EMCBC) provides the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) with a full range of business and technical support services using a strategic model to that used by other field sites. The EMCBC Technical Support and Services resides in the Office of Technical Support and Asset Management (OTSAM). The full-time equivalent (FTE) referenced in the

258

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT PLAN (PEMP) AWARD FEE PLAN (AFP)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- March 2013 Page 1 - March 2013 Page 1 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT PLAN (PEMP) AWARD FEE PLAN (AFP) 1 OCTOBER 2012 through 30 SEPTEMBER 2013 Contract No. DE- EM-0001971 I. INTRODUCTION This Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan (PEMP) provides a standard process for development, administration, and coordination of all phases of the fee determination process consistent with Section B.2 of the subject contract. Fee determinations are not subject to the Disputes Clause of the contract. II. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND DUTIES The following organizational structure is established for administering the fee provisions of the contract. A. Roles and Responsibilities 1. Fee Determination Official (FDO) - The Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) has appointed the CBFO Manager as the FDO. The FDO

259

Fermilab | Directorate | Office of Integrated Planning & Performance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of Integrated Planning & Performance Management (IPPM) Office of Integrated Planning & Performance Management (IPPM) Integrated Planning Diagram Integrated Planning Diagram [Download PPT] Mission: The Office of Integrated Planning and Performance Management (IPPM) within the Fermilab Directorate provides systems and management processes for institutional planning and performance assessment and evaluation. The office of IPPM leads multi-year, forward-looking planning and integration of institutional plans, programs, projects, operations and budgets. In addition it develops, implements and maintains integrated laboratory systems and management processes for strategic planning and goal setting, project and program oversight, enterprise risk management and performance planning and oversight. IPPM Facilitates:

260

Annual Report 06 StatementofServicePerformance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

a financial forecast model and a capital expenditure plan. Achievements A Financial achieved by optimising staff costs, reducing capital expenditure and increasing research-related income and includes a capital expenditure plan. Key strategies for achieving this target included monthly financial

Hickman, Mark

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Annual Performance Report -2011 Water Use Efficiency  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

,802,005Total Water Produced and Purchased (TP) ­ Annual Volume Distribution System Leakage Summary: Note the reporting period listed above, WSU total water produced was 465.8 million gallons which is 106.5 million, service meters recorded 123.3 MilGal of water usage, which accounts for 26.5% of water produced

Collins, Gary S.

262

Annual Planning Summaries: Advanced Research and Projects Agency (ARPA-E) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Research and Projects Agency Research and Projects Agency (ARPA-E) Annual Planning Summaries: Advanced Research and Projects Agency (ARPA-E) Document(s) Available For Download February 2, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. January 26, 2011 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Advanced Research and Projects Agency (ARPA-E) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Advanced Research and Projects Agency (ARPA-E). February 1, 2010 2010 Annual Planning Summary for Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA

263

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EM CBC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 4 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report As of December 31, 2010 Reporting Office EM Consolidated Business Center Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes The EM Consolidated Business Center (EMCBC) provides the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management project sites with a full range of business support services using a strategic model similar to that used by other DOE field sites, as well as logistics management and technical assistance. Attributes of the model include the following: (1) stable business support for a variety of customers with differing project mission requirements and different business support priorities;(2) Combined use of federal employees and support service contractors (as required) to support customer needs, and (3) Optimization of

264

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - EM CBC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 2012 9 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: EM CBC: BOYD EMCBC-00283-12 suBrncr: ANNUAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS AND STAFFING PLAN REPORTS FOR CALENDAR YEAR2011 TO: Karen Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel The Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center (EMCBC) does not have a fixed set of facilities. The responsibilities requiring technical staffing vary from year to year depending upon supported project activities. The types and magnitude of the EM CBC technical capabilities currently needed for safe operations is dictated by the responsibility to provide surveillance and maintenance activities, support and oversee environmental cleanup, and transition of facilities at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL); Grand Junction/Moab UMTRA Project; Separations Process Research

265

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - SRSO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 United States Government National Nuclear Security Administration Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report TO: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP), NNSA Service Center In response to your October 24, 2012, memorandum, we have conducted a staffing analysis for the SRSO. This analysis was conducted in accordance with the models and guidance provided at the FTCP website. We have also completed the attached tables as requested. As SRSO is co-located on an Environmental Management landlord site, we rely on the Savannah River Operations Office for matrix support for certain functions due to the limited number of

266

Microsoft Word - CNS CY 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Attachment 1 Attachment 1 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report as of December 31, 2010 Reporting Office of the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) Section One: Current Mission of the Organization and Potential Changes Revision 2 of U.S. Department of Energy Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation 2004-1 established the seven core CTA responsibilities. The Office of the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) performs to following functions in support of the CTA meeting these responsibilities: 1. Nuclear Safety Requirement Concurrence and Exemption * Concur with the determination of the applicability of DOE directives involving nuclear safety included in Energy and Science contracts pursuant to Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR), 48 CFR 970.5204-2, Laws, regulations, and

267

Savannah River Site Approved Site Treatment Plan, 1998 Annual Update  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Operations Office (DOE- SR),has prepared the Site Treatment Plan (STP) for Savannah River Site (SRS) mixed wastes in accordance with RCRA Section 3021(b), and SCDHEC has approved the STP (except for certain offsite wastes) and issued an order enforcing the STP commitments in Volume I. DOE-SR and SCDHEC agree that this STP fulfills the requirements contained in the FFCAct, RCRA Section 3021, and therefore,pursuant to Section 105(a) of the FFCAct (RCRA Section 3021(b)(5)), DOE`s requirements are to implement the plan for the development of treatment capacities and technologies pursuant to RCRA Section 3021.Emerging and new technologies not yet considered may be identified to manage waste more safely, effectively, and at lower cost than technologies currently identified in the plan. DOE will continue to evaluate and develop technologies that offer potential advantages in public acceptance, privatization, consolidation, risk abatement, performance, and life-cycle cost. Should technologies that offer such advantages be identified, DOE may request a revision/modification of the STP in accordance with the provisions of Consent Order 95-22-HW.The Compliance Plan Volume (Volume I) identifies project activity schedule milestones for achieving compliance with Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR). Information regarding the technical evaluation of treatment options for SRS mixed wastes is contained in the Background Volume (Volume II) and is provided for information.

Lawrence, B. [Westinghouse Savannah River Company, AIKEN, SC (United States); Berry, M.

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

Annual Report on Technology Transfer: Approach and Plans, Fiscal Year 2013 Activities and Achievements  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Annual Report on Technology Transfer: Approach and Plans, Fiscal Year 2013 Activities Institute for Telecommunication Sciences Pursuant to the Technology Transfer and Commercialization Act This report summarizes technology transfer activities and achievements of the Department of Commerce's (DOC

269

Annual Report on Technology Transfer: Approach and Plans, Fiscal Year 2012 Activities and Achievements  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Annual Report on Technology Transfer: Approach and Plans, Fiscal Year 2012 Activities Institute for Telecommunication Sciences Pursuant to the Technology Transfer and Commercialization Act This report summarizes technology transfer activities and achievements of the Department of Commerce's (DOC

270

2011 ANNUAL PLANNING SUMMARY FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH AND PROJECTS AGENCY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

271

2010 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA-SC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

272

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Site Office (SLAC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

273

Fuel performance annual report for 1983. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

This annual report, the sixth in a series, provides a brief description of fuel performance during 1983 in commercial nuclear power plants. Brief summaries of fuel design changes, fuel surveillance programs, fuel operating experience, fuel problems, high-burnup fuel experience, and items of general significance are provided. References to additional, more detailed information and related NRC evaluations are included.

Bailey, W.J.; Dunenfeld, M.S.

1985-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

AGA 12, Part 2 Performance Test Plan (November 2006) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AGA 12, Part 2 Performance Test Plan (November 2006) AGA 12, Part 2 Performance Test Plan (November 2006) Under the guidance and sponsorship of DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery...

275

Its that time of year again: Performance Plans!  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Listed below are some great tools to assist employees, supervisors and managers with measuring and writing performance plans.

276

SAFETY COMMITTEE ANNUAL PLAN TEMPLATE The safety committee and the unit administration work together in promoting the unit's safety and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SAFETY COMMITTEE ANNUAL PLAN TEMPLATE The safety committee and the unit administration work together in promoting the unit's safety and health efforts. The Safety Committee Annual Plan provides. Supervisors can review the plan with new employees during their safety orientation. 3. Safety committee

Collins, Gary S.

277

Annual Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Reports science-innovationassetsimagesicon-science.jpg Annual Reports x Strategic Plan Annual Report - 2011 (pdf) Advancing Science for National Security See more Los...

278

SNL/CA Environmental Planning and Ecology Program Annual Report 2007.  

SciTech Connect

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the Sandia National Laboratories, California (SNL/CA) Environmental Planning and Ecology Program for a given calendar year. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual. The 2006 program report describes the activities undertaken during the past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Planning and Ecology Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA.

Larsen, Barbara L.

2007-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

279

SNL/CA Environmental Planning and Ecology Annual Program Report for Calendar Year 2005.  

SciTech Connect

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the SNL/CA Environmental Planning and Ecology Program for a given calendar year. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual. The 2005 program report describes the activities undertaken during the past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Planning and Ecology Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA.

Larsen, Barbara L.

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Fuel performance annual report for 1984. Volume 2  

SciTech Connect

This annual report, the seventh in a series, provides a brief description of fuel performance during 1984 in commercial nuclear power plants. Brief summaries of fuel design changes, fuel surveillance programs, fuel operating experience, fuel problems, high-burnup fuel experience, and items of general significance are provided. References to additional, more detailed information and related NRC evaluations are included. 279 refs., 11 figs., 29 tabs.

Bailey, W.J.; Dunenfeld, M.S.

1986-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

FY 2007/2008 Contractor Performance Plan, Volume 2  

SciTech Connect

This Contractor Performance Plan is a detailed execution plan covering fiscal years 2007 and 2008 that implements the Integration Project Baseline in a more aggressive cost and schedule approach.

Project Integration

2006-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

282

Microsoft Word - Sec 999 Annual Plan - January 2008 revOMB final agreement.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and 7 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program January 2008 DOE/NETL-2007/1294 Provided in Response to Energy Policy Act of 2005 Section 999, Subtitle J DISCLAIMER The Administration has submitted a legislative proposal to repeal the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research Program. However, the Department of Energy is currently implementing the Subtitle J program according to the requirements of the law and will continue to do so unless the law is repealed. 2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program DOE/NETL-2007/1294

283

2006 Department of Energy Strategic Plan - Linking Strategic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

meeting annual performance metrics. The data is then consolidated for senior management review. 2006 Department of Energy Strategic Plan - Linking Strategic Goals to Annual...

284

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - TEMPLATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for its Major System Acquisitions, including MOX, and is still developing strategic workforce planning for how it will fill staffing needs (e.g. federal versus support...

285

SUMMARY ANNUAL REPORT For LANS Welfare Benefit Plan for Retirees  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

at the main office of the plan (Los Alamos National Security, LLC, Bikini Atoll, MS SM30, Los Alamos, NM 87545

286

2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to the White House Council on Environmental Quality and Office of Management and Budget 2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability...

287

FY 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA NSO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

93-8518 93-8518 JAN 162m3 Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel, DOE National Training Center, (HS-50) Albuquerque, NM NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NEVADA SITE OFFICE (NNSAINSO}ANNUAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS AND STAFFING PLAN REPORT Please find enclosed the NNSA/NSO Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report. It conforms to your guidance dated October 24, 2012. In summary, the current shortages at NNSA/NSO are: High Priority None Medium Priority None Other Positions 0.25 Civil/Structural Engineering FTE 0.25 Construction Management FTE The enclosed plan outlines our strategy to meet these requirements in FY 2013. If you have any questions regarding this plan, please contact Barry Mellor at (702) 295-1456.

288

Annual Report on Technology Transfer: Approach and Plans, Fiscal Year 2008 Activities and Achievements  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Annual Report on Technology Transfer: Approach and Plans, Fiscal Year 2008 Activities--Institute for Telecommunication Sciences In response to the: Technology Transfer and Commercialization Act of 2000 (P.L. 106 (FY) 2008. At the Department of Commerce, technology transfer is a significant part of the mission

Perkins, Richard A.

289

Annual Report on Technology Transfer: Approach and Plans, Fiscal Year 2011 Activities and Achievements  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Annual Report on Technology Transfer: Approach and Plans, Fiscal Year 2011 Activities Pursuant to the Technology Transfer Commercialization Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-404) January 2012 #12;ii This page is intentionally left blank FOREWORD This report summarizes technology transfer activities

Perkins, Richard A.

290

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18, 2013 18, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDM AN CHAIRP ERSON rROM: SU BJ ECT: REFERENCE: FEDE RAL TECHN ICA L CAPABILITIES PANEL MARK WI IITNEY It J I MAN AG ER VV"-c.--'\<.- OAK RIDGE OFFICE or ENV IRONMENT/\L M~ OAK RIDG E OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT/\ L M/\NAGEMENT ANNUAL WORKFORCE ANAL YSJS AND STAFFING REPORT Memorandum from Karen L. Boardman to Distribution, Annual Workfhrce Analysis and Stqfftng Plan Report f(Jr Calendar Year 20 12, dated October 24, 20 12 As requested, attached is the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Manage ment (OREM) Calendar Year 2012 annual workforce anal ys is and staffing plan th at identifi es the technica l capabil iti es and pos itions ORe:M needs to ensure safe operations of OREM assigned nuc lear faci liti es. This report is submitted for incorporation into the Federa

291

EIS-0380: Fiscal Year 2011 Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report for the 2008 Los Alamos Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Fiscal Year 2011 Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report for the 2008 Los Alamos Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement

292

Fuel performance annual report for 1991. Volume 9  

SciTech Connect

This report is the fourteenth in a series that provides a compilation of information regarding commercial nuclear fuel performance. The series of annual reports were developed as a result of interest expressed by the public, advising bodies, and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for public availability of information pertaining to commercial nuclear fuel performance. During 1991, the nuclear industry`s focus regarding fuel continued to be on extending burnup while maintaining fuel rod reliability. Utilities realize that high-burnup fuel reduces the amount of generated spent fuel, reduces fuel costs, reduces operational and maintenance costs, and improves plant capacity factors by extending operating cycles. Brief summaries of fuel operating experience, fuel design changes, fuel surveillance programs, high-burnup experience, problem areas, and items of general significance are provided.

Painter, C.L.; Alvis, J.M.; Beyer, C.E. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States); Marion, A.L. [Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR (United States). Dept. of Nuclear Engineering; Payne, G.A. [Northwest Coll. and Univ. Association for Science, Richland, WA (United States); Kendrick, E.D. [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

293

Savannah River Site Approved Site Treatment Plan, 1998 Annual Update  

SciTech Connect

The Compliance Plan Volume (Volume I) identifies project activity schedule milestones for achieving compliance with Land Disposal Restrictions. Information regarding the technical evaluation of treatment options for SRS mixed wastes is contained in the Background Volume (Volume II) and is provided for information.

Lawrence, B.

1999-04-20T23:59:59.000Z

294

Savannah River Site approved site treatment plan, 2000 annual update  

SciTech Connect

The Compliance Plan Volume (Volume 1) identifies project activity schedule milestones for achieving compliance with Land Disposal Restrictions. Information regarding the technical evaluation of treatment options for SRS mixed wastes is contained in the Background Volume (Volume 2) and is provided for information.

Lawrence, B.

2000-04-20T23:59:59.000Z

295

Summary Annual Report For LANS 401(k) Retirement Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, or any part thereof, write or call LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC, BIKINI ATOLL RD, SM 30, LOS ALAMOS of the plan at LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC, BIKINI ATOLL RD, SM 30, LOS ALAMOS, NM 87545, and at the U

296

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Federal Technical Personnel January 2013 DOENE-ORSO CONCURRENCE AND APPROVAL CONCURRENCE: Marianne Heiskell, Lease and Technical Management Branch Chief Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office Randy DeVault, Regulatory Management Branch Chief, NE-ORSO Nucl~ffic ,___.~,. Larry Perkins, Deputy Manager, Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office APPROVAL: January 2013 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Date I /v/13 Date! 1/~3/13 Date ,;:L :/ /. * ~ Page ii DOENE-ORSO Table of Contents Section 1: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes Section 2: Technical Staffing Section 3: Current Shortages and Plans for Filling

297

Annual daylighting performance of a passive optical light shelf in sidelit  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual daylighting performance of a passive optical light shelf in sidelit Annual daylighting performance of a passive optical light shelf in sidelit perimeter zones of commercial buildings Title Annual daylighting performance of a passive optical light shelf in sidelit perimeter zones of commercial buildings Publication Type Report Year of Publication 2013 Authors McNeil, Andrew, and Eleanor S. Lee Keywords bidirectional scattering distribution functions, building energy efficiency, daylighting, Radiance simulations Abstract Sunlight redirecting systems have the potential to significantly offset electric lighting energy use in deep perimeter zones of buildings where the windows are subject to high daylight availability. New Radiance modeling tools have recently been developed and validated, enabling accurate and timely simulation analysis of the annual energy and comfort performance of these optically-complex, anisotropic systems. A parametric study was conducted using these tools to evaluate the performance of a commercially-available passive optical light shelf (OLS) in a 17.4 m deep (57 ft), south-facing open plan office zone in three climates. Daylighting efficiency, discomfort glare, and lighting energy savings with continuous dimming and bi-level switching controls were determined at varying depths within the zone. The OLS decreased lighting energy use significantly throughout the depth of the space and achieved these savings with minimal discomfort glare in the area near the window. Annual lighting energy use intensity was reduced to 1.71-1.82 kWh/ft2-yr (22-27%) over the full depth of the perimeter zone across the three climates modeled (Phoenix, Washington DC, and Minneapolis) compared to a non-daylit zone at 2.34 kWh/ft2-yr. There was a greater occurrence of discomfort glare (3-7% during daytime work hours) if the occupant was in a seated view position looking at the window from the back of the room. The system is passive, needing no adjustment during the day and over the seasons and can be used as a retrofit measure in existing buildings. These results are encouraging and demonstrate how the primary daylit sidelit area can be extended well beyond the defined limits provided by the newly adopted ASHRAE 90.1-2010 code (i.e., 1.0 times the head height of the window).

298

2013 Inshore SSIP Report Pg. 1 March 31, 2014 2013 Inshore Salmon Savings Incentive Plan Annual Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Report Amendment 91 IPA Identification Number 1 By John Gruver Inshore Salmon Savings Incentive Plan Reporting Requirements. Amendment 91 regulations require each Incentive Plan Agreement (IPA) representative of the Incentive Plan Agreement (IPA). Agreement Summary. The vessels participating in this IPA receive an annual

299

DOE Annual NEPA Planning Summary report templates 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Status of Ongoing Environmental Assessments " Status of Ongoing Environmental Assessments " "EERE - Golden Field Office (GO)" 2012 "Title, Location, Document Number","Reserved For GC use","Estimated Cost","Estimated Schedule (NEPA Milestones)",,"Description" "Renewable Fuel Heat Plant Improvements Supplemental Environmental Assessment, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado (DOE/EA-1573-S-I) ",,25000,"EA Determination Date:","application/vnd.ms-excel","The public scoping period ended on 6/16/11. Transmittal to the state is planned for early February 2012." ,,,"Transmittal to State:","application/vnd.ms-excel" ,,,"EA Approval:","application/vnd.ms-excel"

300

DOE Annual NEPA Planning Summary report templates 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center (RMOTC)" Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center (RMOTC)" "Enter APS report date here" "Title, Location, Document Number","Reserved For GC use","Est Cost","Estimated Schedule (NEPA Milestones)",,"Description" "Environmental Assessment for Disposition of Naval Petroleum Reserve Number 3 (NPR-3). Midwest, WY",,50000,"EA Determination Date:","application/vnd.ms-excel","NPR-3 will begin implementing the disposition plan with final disposition of the property expected to occur in FY 2015. NPR-3 will be utilized for production and testing operations in order to retain asset value during preparation to transfer to potential new ownership. Production facilities will remain operational as long as economic. The program will continue Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center (RMOTC) testing for 100 percent funds-in projects and those projects wholly funded by EERE's Geothermal Technology Program. Environmental remediation of NPR-3 facilities will continue to facilitate the sale/disposition of the property in a manner consistent with an approved property sale/disposition plan.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Environmental Release Prevention and Control Plan (ERP and CP) annual review and update for 1993  

SciTech Connect

In the Environmental Release Prevention and Control Plan (ERP and CP), WSRC made a commitment to conduct the following follow-up activities and actions: (1) Complete the action items developed in response to the findings and recommendation of the Environmental Release Prevention Taskteam (WSRC-RP-92-356). (2) Complete all batch and continuous release procedure revisions to incorporate the attributes that WSRC senior management required of each procedure. (3) DOE-SR Assistance Managers and WSRC counterparts to reach consensus and closure on the identified engineered solutions documented in the ERP and CP, develop and drive implementation of facility changes per the agreements. (4) Continue to analyze releases and monitor performance in accordance with the ERP and CP, and utilize the ALARA Release Guides Committee to drive improvements. (5) Conduct annual re-evaluations of the cost benefit analyses of the identified engineered solutions, and identify new options and alternatives for each outfall in response to site mission and facility changes. This report documents the efforts that have been completed over the past year in response to these commitments.

Jannik, G.T. [comp.; Mamatey, A.; Arnett, M.

1993-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

302

Nevada Test Site, site treatment plan 1999 annual update  

SciTech Connect

A Site Treatment Plan (STP) is required for facilities at which the US Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) generates or stores mixed waste (MW), defined by the Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFC Act) as waste containing both a hazardous waste subject to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and a radioactive material subject to the Atomic Energy Act. This STP was written to identify specific treatment facilities for treating DOE/NV generated MW and provides proposed implementation schedules. This STP was approved by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) and provided the basis for the negotiation and issuance of the FFC Act Consent Order (CO) dated March 6, 1996, and revised June 15, 1998. The FFC Act CO sets forth stringent regulatory requirements to comply with the implementation of the STP.

NONE

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

303

High Performance Green Schools Planning Grants | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

High Performance Green Schools Planning Grants High Performance Green Schools Planning Grants High Performance Green Schools Planning Grants < Back Eligibility Schools Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Bioenergy Solar Lighting Windows, Doors, & Skylights Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Water Heating Wind Program Info State Pennsylvania Program Type State Grant Program Rebate Amount Determined on a case-by-case basis Provider Governor's Green Government Council The Governor's Green Government Council of Pennsylvania provides an incentive for new schools to be built according to green building standards. High Performance Green Schools Planning Grants are designed to cover a portion of the "soft" costs of designing a green building that are

304

Advanced Technology Planning for Energy Savings Performance Contracts |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Technology Planning for Energy Savings Performance Advanced Technology Planning for Energy Savings Performance Contracts Advanced Technology Planning for Energy Savings Performance Contracts October 7, 2013 - 1:40pm Addthis Call for Projects FEMP recently issued a notice of intent to release a Funding Opportunity Announcement that will provide grants to develop capital combined heat and power projects. Read the call for projects. Legislation emphasizes the implementation of energy-efficiency and renewable energy technologies in Federal agencies. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) assists agencies in identifying and planning opportunities to deploy advanced technologies using energy savings performance contracts (ESPC). A Federal financing specialist (FFS) will work with a project facilitator and a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratory team to identify

305

Microsoft Word - 2008 Annual Plan 8-11-08 final.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

08 08 DOE/NETL-2008/1315 Provided in Response to Energy Policy Act of 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J 2008 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program DISCLAIMER The Administration has submitted to Congress a legislative proposal to repeal Subtitle J of Title IX of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 which authorized the Ultra- Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research Program. However, the Department of Energy is currently implementing the Title IX, Subtitle J program according to the requirements of the law and will continue to do so unless the law is repealed. 2008 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum

306

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA for Safety and Health  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report As of December 31, 2011 Reporting Office: NNSA NA-SH Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes The Office of the Associate Administrator for Safety and Health (NA-SH) provides mission enabling support to the NNSA Administrator, Central Technical Authority (CTA), Acquisition Executives, senior NNSA officials, program officers and site offices. NA-SH enables other NNSA organizations to fulfill NNSA missions while protecting the environment and safeguarding the safety and health of the public and the workforce. Section Two: SITE CHARACTERISTICS TABLE 1 Number of Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 Nuclear Facilities: HC 1: 0; HC 2: 0; HC 3: 0 Number of Radiological Facilities

307

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA HQ NA-70  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report As of December 31, 2011 Reporting Office: NNSA NA-70 Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes 1. DNS is the NNSA line management organization responsible for security direction and program management with respect to prioritization of resources, program evaluation, and funding allocation. Key management areas include security operations, resources, engineering, and technical support to NNSA field elements and facilities. Specific subject matter expertise also includes physical and personnel security, protective forces, nuclear materials control and accountability, classified and sensitive information protection, and technical security programs. DNS evaluates the status of protection programs at all NNSA facilities against National policy and

308

Microsoft Word - 2010 Annual Plan - 12-3-09 - OMB Cleared-glc tables.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2009 2009 DOE/NETL-2009/1384 Provided in Response to Energy Policy Act of 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) 2010 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program DISCLAIMER The Administration has submitted to Congress a legislative proposal to repeal Subtitle J of Title IX of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 which authorized the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research Program. However, the Department of Energy is implementing Title IX, Subtitle J according to the requirements of the law, and will continue to do so unless the law is repealed. 2010 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other

309

Microsoft Word - 1-8-09 2009 Annual Plan.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2008 December 2008 DOE/NETL-2009/1343 Provided in Response to Energy Policy Act of 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) 2009 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program DISCLAIMER The Administration has submitted to Congress a legislative proposal to repeal Subtitle J of Title IX of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 which authorized the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research Program. However, the Department of Energy is currently implementing Title IX, Subtitle J according to the requirements of the law, and will continue to do so unless the law is repealed. 2009 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and

310

Microsoft Word - Annual_NEPA_Planning_Summary_2012_Memo ecc.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31, 2012 31, 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: BPA-KEC-4 SUBJECT: 2012 Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summary Timothy G. Lynch, Acting General Counsel Attached please find Bonneville Power Administration's (BPAs) 2012 Annual NEPA Planning Summary. As requested in your December 5, 2011, memorandum, the summary identifies the status of ongoing environmental assessments (EAs), ongoing environmental impact statements (EISs), EAs expected to be prepared during the next 12 months, and EISs expected to be prepared during the next 24 months. We have included documents for which BPA will be the lead federal agency, as well as documents for which BPA will be a cooperating agency. The EAs and EISs forecasted have a high probability of going forward. However, it is very

311

Rev. 11/16/09 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE PLAN AND APPRAISAL  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SI-5000C Rev. 11/16/09 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE PLAN AND APPRAISAL MID-CYCLE REVIEW Completion-CYCLE REVIEW (Check appropriate box) Review indicates performance is Successful or better (written narrative and filling out the below boxes are optional). Review indicates performance is Successful; however

312

Review of DOE HQ Emergency Response Plans and Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance March 2003 Prepared by Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT AND PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE REVIEW OF DOE HEADQUARTERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS AND PERFORMANCE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted a review of emergency response plans and performance at DOE Headquarters (HQ) in February 2003. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the readiness and effectiveness of the DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) emergency response teams for a postulated emergency at a field site, and the HQ Incident Command Team for an emergency affecting the Forrestal building. In addition,

313

2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to the White  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to the 2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to the White House Council on Environmental Quality and Office of Management and Budget 2010 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan - Report to the White House Council on Environmental Quality and Office of Management and Budget Sustainability is fundamental to the Department of Energy's research mission and operations as reflected in the Department's Strategic Plan. Our overarching mission is to discover the solutions to power and secure America's future. We are implementing our mission through three strategic goals: Innovation to maintain U.S. global leadership in science and engineering; Energy to build a competitive and sustainable clean energy economy to secure America's energy future; and Security to reduce nuclear

314

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - PPPO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2012 22, 2012 Reporting Office: Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes The PPPO mission is to effectively implement EM responsibilities, obligations and activities at the Department's Portsmouth, Ohio and Paducah, Kentucky, sites: Accomplish environmental remediation actions in compliance with regulatory milestones and agreements. Disposition legacy and newly generated waste. Implement Cold Shutdown requirements. Disposition of depleted uranium hexafluoride cylinders stored at both sites. Perform Decontamination and Decommissioning of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant The PPPO Manager serves as the line manager reporting to the Assistant Secretary for Environmental

315

Integrated approach towards the application of horizontal wells to improve waterflooding performance. Annual report  

SciTech Connect

This annual report describes the progress during the second year of the project on Integrated Approach Towards the Application of Horizontal Wells to Improve Waterflooding Performance. This project is funded under the Department of Energy`s Class I program which is targeted towards improving the reservoir performance of mature oil fields located in fluvial-dominated deltaic deposits. The project involves an integrated approach to characterize the reservoir followed by the drilling of horizontal injection wells to improve production performance. The type of data we have integrated include cross bore hole seismic surveys, geological interpretation based on logs and cores, and engineering information. This report covers the second phase of the project which includes a detailed reservoir description of the field by integrating all the available information, followed by flow simulation of the Self Unit under various operating conditions. Based on an examination of the various operating parameters, we observed that the best possible solution to improve the Self Unit performance is to recomplete and stimulate most of the wells followed by an increase in the water injection rate. Drilling of horizontal injection well, although helpful in improving the performance, was not found to be economically feasible. The proposed reservoir management plan will be implemented shortly.

Kelkar, M.; Liner, C.; Kerr, D.

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

Manual of Administrative Policies and Procedures Policy 6.4 Performance Plan and Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Manual of Administrative Policies and Procedures Policy 6.4 ­ Performance Plan and Review Policy Category: Personnel Subject: Performance Plans and Review Approving Authority: Board of Governors Procedures: Administrative Procedures for Performance Plan and Review Related University Policies: Effective

Lennard, William N.

317

Designing and Implementing Effective Performance Assurance Plans  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12 12 Ed Anderson, PE CEM FPL Federal Sales Manager  Part of the NextEra Energy family  NextEra Energy Resources  FPL Energy Solutions  GEXA  FPL (Utility)  3rd largest investor-owned utility  Typically #1 or 2 in Energy Efficiency (DSM programs)  Lowest Electric Rates in the State (25% lower than National Average)  In 2010, commissioned Nation's largest PV plant and the first solar preheat fossil plant.  Completed 50 UESC projects since 1995  First Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) in the Nation  Seven different agencies ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Based on demonstrating the performance of the installed equipment and systems. The Statement of Work includes equipment and system performance metrics and measuring

318

NNSA Strategic Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) FOR  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Management and Operation of the Management and Operation of the Babcock and Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC Contract Number: DE-ACOS-OOOR22800 Performance period: October 01, 2012 through September 30, 2013 . Spencer Date President and General Manager Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC jO/~ nag , Contracts & Special Initiatives ck & Wilcox Technical Services Y -12, LLC National Nuclear Security Administration INTRODUCTION Y-12 National Security Complex is managed by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC, herein referenced as "Contractor", for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Contract, and Clause 1.154 DEAR 970.5215-1 Total Available Fee: Base Fee Amount and Performance

319

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA HQ NA-10  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

printed 2/17/2012 2:23:00 PM Page 1 of 8 printed 2/17/2012 2:23:00 PM Page 1 of 8 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report As of December 31, 2011 Reporting Office: NNSA NA-10 HQ (including NA-15 inputs) Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes NNSA Mission: To strengthen United States security through the military application of nuclear energy. NNSA Vision: To be an integrated nuclear security enterprise operating an efficient and agile nuclear weapons complex, recognized as preeminent in technical leadership and program management. Organizational Changes: NNSA is in the final phase of re-organizing. This plan reflects known changes that resulted from the elimination of the ABQ Service Center and re-distribution of the functions and personnel, some of whom were part of the TQP Program. The plan has also

320

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA Production Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

t.Jt'S~l t.Jt'S~l National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Department of Energy NNSA ProductiOn Office Post Off1ce Box 2050 Oak Ridge. Tennessee 37831-8009 FEB -7 2013 MEMORANDUMFORKARENBOARDMAN CHAIRPERSON FROM: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAP ABIL KENNETH A. HOAR ASSISTANT MANAGER ENVIRONMENT, SAFET Staffing Plan for the National Nu ear Security Administration Production Office DOE Memorandum, ANNUAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS AND STAFFING PLAN REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR (CY) 2012, Boardman/Agents, dated October 24, 2012 We have completed our analysis of staffing needs per the guidance in the referenced memorandum. Our revised staffing plan for the NNSA Production Office is attached. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (806) 4 77-7158 or Susan Morris at

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Annual performance prediction for off-axis aligned Lugo heliostats at Solar Two  

SciTech Connect

The DELSOL computer code was used to model the annual Performance for numerous off-axis alignments of the Lugo heliostats located at the Solar Two site in Dagget, California. Recommended canting times are presented for the Lugo heliostats based upon their location in the field. Predicted annual performance of an off-axis alignment was actually higher than for on-axis alignment in some cases, and approximately equal if the recommended times are used. The annual performances of Solar One heliostats located nearby were also calculated, and illustrated the poorer performance expected of the Lugo heliostats.

Jones, S.A.

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

Performance assessment implementation plan for the geologic repository program  

SciTech Connect

Performance assessment is a major constituent of the program being conducted in the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (CRWM) Program of the US Department of Energy (DOE) to develop a geologic repository. Performance assessment is the set of activities needed for quantitative evaluations of repository-system performance to access compliance with regulations and to support the development of the geologic repository. To define the strategy for these evaluations, the DOE has developed this performance assessment strategy plan. This document discusses the need for such a strategy, the objectives and scope of the strategy plan, the relationship of the plan to other program plans. Additionally, it defines performance assessment and describes the roles of performance assessment in this program, discusses concepts and general strategies needed for performance assessment, outlines the content of the Safety Analysis Report, summarizes the requirements for the repository Environmental Impact Statement, discusses the requirements that apply to the site-suitability analyses and describes the site characterization. 10 figs., 7 tabs.

NONE

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

Annual Report for Gravity Collection Lysimeter Monitoring Plan- ERDF Cells 5 and 6, CY 2008  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this annual report is to evaluate the conditions and identify trends to develop Hanford site-specific data on the performance of the lysimeter systems related to the vadose zone monitoring and potential future use of lysimeter systems.

R. L. Weiss; D. W. Woolery

2009-08-25T23:59:59.000Z

324

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA for Safety and Health - NA-26  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Draft as of December 31, 2012 Reporting Office: _NA-26 Office of Fissile Material Disposition at SRS____ Section 1: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes 1. The Office of Fissile Material Disposition (NA-26) is part of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). NA-26 supports NNSA Strategic Plan Goal #2, "Provide technical leadership to limit or prevent the spread of materials, technology, and expertise relating to weapons of mass destruction; advance the technologies to detect the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction worldwide, and eliminate or secure inventories of surplus materials and infrastructure usable for nuclear weapons." The NA-26 organization focuses on the safe and secure disposition of

325

U.S. Department of Energy High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Implementation Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Plan outlining DOE's commitment to designing, building, operating, and maintaining high performance and sustainable buildings (HPSB).

326

U.S. Department of Energy 2012 Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

This document details the U.S. Department of Energy's 2012 strategic sustainability performance plan.

327

1997 annual ground control operating plan for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant  

SciTech Connect

This plan presents background information and a working guide to assist Mine Operations and Engineering in developing strategies for addressing ground control issues at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). With the anticipated receipt of waste in late 1997, this document provides additional detail to Panel 1 activities and options. The plan also serves as a foundation document for development and revision of the annual long-term ground control plan. Section 2.0 documents the current status of all underground excavations with respect to location, geology, geometry, age, ground support, operational use, projected life, and physical conditions. Section 3.0 presents the methods used to evaluate ground conditions, including visual observations of the roof, ribs, and floor, inspection of observation holes, and review of instrumentation data. Section 4.0 lists several ground support options and specific applications of each. Section 5.0 discusses remedial ground control measures that have been implemented to date. Section 6.0 presents projections and recommendations for ground control actions based on the information in Sections 2.0 through 5.0 of this plan and on a rating of the critical nature of each specific area. Section 7.0 presents a summary statement, and Section 8.0 includes references. Appendix A provides an overview and critique of ground control systems that have been, or may be, used at the site. Because of the dynamic nature of the underground openings and associated geotechnical activities, this plan will be revised as additional data are incorporated.

NONE

1997-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Annual Report on U.S. Wind Power Installation, Cost, and Performance Trends: 2006  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

  Annual Report on U.S. Wind Power Installation, Cost, and Performance Trends: 006 Contents Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 U.S. Wind Power Capacity Increased by 7% in 006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 The United States Leads the World in Annual Capacity Growth . . . . . . . .4 Texas, Washington, and California Lead the U.S. in Annual Capacity Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 GE Wind Is the Dominant Turbine Manufacturer, with Siemens Gaining Market Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Average Turbine Size Continues to Increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Developer Consolidation Accelerates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Innovation and Competition in Non-Utility Wind Financing Persists . . . .9

329

The EM SSAB Annual Work Plan Process: Focusing Board Efforts and Resources - 13667  

SciTech Connect

One of the most daunting tasks for any new member of a local board of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB) is to try to understand the scope of the clean-up activities going on at the site. In most cases, there are at least two or three major cleanup activities in progress as well as monitoring of past projects. When planning for future projects is added to the mix, the list of projects can be long. With the clean-up activities involving all major environmental media - air, water, soils, and groundwater, new EM SSAB members can find themselves totally overwhelmed and ineffective. Helping new members get over this initial hurdle is a major objective of EM and all local boards of the EM SSAB. Even as members start to understand the size and scope of the projects at a site, they can still be frustrated at the length of time it takes to see results and get projects completed. Many project and clean-up timelines for most of the sites go beyond 10 years, so it's not unusual for an EM SSAB member to see the completion of only 1 or 2 projects over the course of their 6-year term on the board. This paper explores the annual work planning process of the EM SSAB local boards, one tool that can be used to educate EM SSAB members into seeing the broader picture for the site. EM SSAB local work plans divide the site into projects focused on a specific environmental issue or media such as groundwater and/or waste disposal options. Projects are further broken down into smaller segments by highlighting major milestones. Using these metrics, local boards of the EM SSAB can start to quantify the effectiveness of the project in achieving the ultimate goal of site clean-up. These metrics can also trigger board advice and recommendations for EM. At the beginning of each fiscal year, the EM SSAB work plan provides a road map with quantifiable checkpoints for activities throughout the year. When the work plans are integrated with site-specific, enforceable regulatory milestones, they can provide a comprehensive work plan for not only the board, but also regulators, site contractors, and DOE. Because the work plans are reviewed and approved by DOE, they carry some weight in holding local boards of the EM SSAB accountable. This structure provides the basis for local boards to achieve their primary function, to provide DOE with information, advice, and recommendations concerning issues affecting the EM program at the site. (authors)

Young, Ralph [Paducah Citizens Advisory Board (United States)] [Paducah Citizens Advisory Board (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Microsoft Word - Sec 999 Annual Plan - FINAL with FACA recommendations _August 13_.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2007 1, 2007 DOE/NETL-2007/1294 Provided in Response to Energy Policy Act of 2005 Section 999, Subtitle J 2007 Annual Plan for the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name,

331

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA NA-00 and NA-10  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Last printed 1/24/2013 10:50:00 AM Page 1 of 12 Last printed 1/24/2013 10:50:00 AM Page 1 of 12 Part 1. NA-00/NA-10/NA-15 Input Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report As of December 31, 2012 Reporting Offices: NNSA NA-10 HQ (including NA-15 inputs) and NA-00 (while transitioning to new organizational structure) Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes NNSA Mission: To strengthen United States security through the military application of nuclear energy. NNSA Vision: To be an integrated nuclear security enterprise operating an efficient and agile nuclear weapons complex, recognized as preeminent in technical leadership and program management. Organizational Changes: NNSA is in the final phase of another re-organization that will split NA- 10 and establish an independent office, NA-00, to oversee the NNSA sites and other non-weapons-

332

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA NA-70  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report As of December 31, 2012 Reporting Office: NNSA NA-70 Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes The DNS core mission is to protect NNSA capabilities, facilities, materials, information, and employees. DNS is responsible for managing and funding the security that supports the NNSA missions, with the exception of those missions under the Office of Naval Reactors and the Office of Secure Transportation's (OST) over-the-road operations. DNS also provides unique knowledge and expertise in nuclear security for a broader set of 21st century national security needs that are synergistic with its mission, such as those in nuclear non-proliferation, homeland security, and intelligence. DNS provides the overall

333

OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY NEPA Annual Planning Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENERGY RELIABILITY NEPA Annual Planning Summary 2012 Environmental Impact Statements Energia Sierra Juarez (DOE/EIS-0414)- Energia Sierra Juarez (ESJ) (formerly Baja Wind) applied to OE for a Presidential permit to construct a 1250 MW electric transmission line across the U.S.-Mexico border. The proposed transmission line would originate inside Mexico at the proposed La Rumorosa Wind Generation Facility. The line would continue north approximately two miles to the U. S.-Mexico border, and one additional mile inside the U.S. to a new substation to be constructed on the existing Southwest Powerlink. The proposed transmission line would be used to transmit renewable energy into the California electricity market. The County of San Diego is a cooperating agency. DEIS NOA (75 FR 57018) issued in September 2010, public

334

Annual research plan, 1983-84. [Organic compounds derived from fossil substances  

SciTech Connect

The National Institute for Petroleum and Energy Research (NIPER) resulted from efforts by the Department of Energy (DOE) to ensure the continuity of the unique energy research capabilities that had been developed at the Bartlesville Energy Technology Center (BETC) over the past 65 years. This was accomplished by a Cooperative Agreement between DOE and IIT Research Institute (IITRI). The agreement to operate NIPER for the five fiscal years 1984-88 became effective October 1, 1983. The NIPER Annual Research Plan for 1983-84 consists of eight projects in the Base Program and 13 projects in the Optional Program. A sampling of potential Work for Others projects is also presented. The Base Program consists of five EOR and three Fundamental Petroleum Chemistry projects. The Optional Program has three EOR projects, one Unconventional Gas Recovery project, five APT projects, and four Advanced Utilization Research projects.

None

1984-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - West Valley Demonstration Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ATTACHMENT ATTACHMENT 1 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report As ofDecember 31, 2012 Reporting Office: West Valley Demonstration Project Section 1: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes The mission of the WVDP as defined by the West Valley Demonstration Project Act (Public Law 96-368) is to accomplish five activities: 1) solidify high-level radioactive waste (HLW), 2) develop containers suitable for permanent disposal of the HLW, 3) transport the HLW to a Federal repository for permanent disposal, 4) dispose of low-level and transuranic waste produced by the solidification of the HLW, and 5) decontaminate and decommission the HLW tanks and facilities, materials and hardware used to solidify the HLW. DOE expects to accomplish these WVDP activities through proactive leadership, management, and implementation of safe and environmentally sound operations.

336

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA for Safety and Health  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report as of December 31, 2012 Reporting Office: NNSA NA-SH Section 1: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes The Office of the Associate Administrator for Safety and Health (NA-SH) provides mission enabling support to the NNSA Administrator, Central Technical Authority (CTA), Acquisition Executives, senior NNSA officials, program officers and site offices. NA-SH enables other NNSA organizations to fulfill NNSA missions while protecting the environment and safeguarding the safety and health of the public and the workforce. Section 2: SITE CHARACTERISTICS TABLE 1 Number of Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 Nuclear Facilities: HC 1:_0_; HC 2: _0_; HC 3: _0_. Number of Radiological Facilities

337

Performance Demonstration Program Plan for Analysis of Simulated Headspace Gases  

SciTech Connect

The Performance Demonstration Program (PDP) for headspace gases distributes blind audit samples in a gas matrix for analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Participating measurement facilities (i.e., fixed laboratories, mobile analysis systems, and on-line analytical systems) are located across the United States. Each sample distribution is termed a PDP cycle. These evaluation cycles provide an objective measure of the reliability of measurements performed for transuranic (TRU) waste characterization. The primary documents governing the conduct of the PDP are the Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD) (DOE/CBFO-94-1012) and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Waste Analysis Plan (WAP) contained in the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (NM4890139088-TSDF) issued by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED). The WAP requires participation in the PDP; the PDP must comply with the QAPD and the WAP. This plan implements the general requirements of the QAPD and the applicable requirements of the WAP for the Headspace Gas (HSG) PDP. Participating measurement facilities analyze blind audit samples of simulated TRU waste package headspace gases according to the criteria set by this PDP Plan. Blind audit samples (hereafter referred to as PDP samples) are used as an independent means to assess each measurement facilitys compliance with the WAP quality assurance objectives (QAOs). To the extent possible, the concentrations of VOC analytes in the PDP samples encompass the range of concentrations anticipated in actual TRU waste package headspace gas samples. Analyses of headspace gases are required by the WIPP to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements. These analyses must be performed by measurement facilities that have demonstrated acceptable performance in this PDP. These analyses are referred to as WIPP analyses and the TRU waste package headspace gas samples on which they are performed are referred to as WIPP samples in this document. Participating measurement facilities must analyze PDP samples using the same procedures used for routine waste characterization analyses of WIPP samples.

Carlsbad Field Office

2007-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

338

Performance Demonstration Program Plan for Analysis of Simulated Headspace Gases  

SciTech Connect

The Performance Demonstration Program (PDP) for headspace gases distributes blind audit samples in a gas matrix for analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Participating measurement facilities (i.e., fixed laboratories, mobile analysis systems, and on-line analytical systems) are located across the United States. Each sample distribution is termed a PDP cycle. These evaluation cycles provide an objective measure of the reliability of measurements performed for transuranic (TRU) waste characterization. The primary documents governing the conduct of the PDP are the Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD) (DOE/CBFO-94-1012) and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Waste Analysis Plan (WAP) contained in the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (NM4890139088-TSDF) issued by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED). The WAP requires participation in the PDP; the PDP must comply with the QAPD and the WAP. This plan implements the general requirements of the QAPD and the applicable requirements of the WAP for the Headspace Gas (HSG) PDP. Participating measurement facilities analyze blind audit samples of simulated TRU waste package headspace gases according to the criteria set by this PDP Plan. Blind audit samples (hereafter referred to as PDP samples) are used as an independent means to assess each measurement facilitys compliance with the WAP quality assurance objectives (QAOs). To the extent possible, the concentrations of VOC analytes in the PDP samples encompass the range of concentrations anticipated in actual TRU waste package headspace gas samples. Analyses of headspace gases are required by the WIPP to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements. These analyses must be performed by measurement facilities that have demonstrated acceptable performance in this PDP. These analyses are referred to as WIPP analyses and the TRU waste package headspace gas samples on which they are performed are referred to as WIPP samples in this document. Participating measurement facilities must analyze PDP samples using the same procedures used for routine waste characterization analyses of WIPP samples.

Carlsbad Field Office

2007-11-13T23:59:59.000Z

339

Performance Demonstration Program Plan for Analysis of Simulated Headspace Gases  

SciTech Connect

The Performance Demonstration Program (PDP) for headspace gases distributes sample gases of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for analysis. Participating measurement facilities (i.e., fixed laboratories, mobile analysis systems, and on-line analytical systems) are located across the United States. Each sample distribution is termed a PDP cycle. These evaluation cycles provide an objective measure of the reliability of measurements performed for transuranic (TRU) waste characterization. The primary documents governing the conduct of the PDP are the Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD) (DOE/CBFO-94-1012) and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Waste Analysis Plan (WAP) contained in the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (NM4890139088-TSDF) issued by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED). The WAP requires participation in the PDP; the PDP must comply with the QAPD and the WAP. This plan implements the general requirements of the QAPD and the applicable requirements of the WAP for the Headspace Gas (HSG) PDP. Participating measurement facilities analyze blind audit samples of simulated TRU waste package headspace gases according to the criteria set by this PDP Plan. Blind audit samples (hereafter referred to as PDP samples) are used as an independent means to assess each measurement facilitys compliance with the WAP quality assurance objectives (QAOs). To the extent possible, the concentrations of VOC analytes in the PDP samples encompass the range of concentrations anticipated in actual TRU waste package headspace gas samples. Analyses of headspace gases are required by the WIPP to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements. These analyses must be performed by measurement facilities that have demonstrated acceptable performance in this PDP. These analyses are referred to as WIPP analyses and the TRU waste package headspace gas samples on which they are performed are referred to as WIPP samples in this document. Participating measurement facilities must analyze PDP samples using the same procedures used for routine waste characterization analyses of WIPP samples.

Carlsbad Field Office

2006-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

Handbook for Planning and Conducting Charrettes for High-Performance Projects: Second Edition  

SciTech Connect

This handbook furnishes guidance for planning and conducting a high-performance building charrette, sometimes called a "greening charrette."

Lindsay, G.; Todd, J. A.; Hayter, S. J.; Ellis, P. G.

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

2010 U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

2010 U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan developed as required by Executive Order 13514.

342

2011 U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

2011 U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan developed as required by Executive Order 13514.

343

The Groundwater Performance Assessment Project Quality Assurance Plan  

SciTech Connect

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has monitored groundwater on the Hanford Site since the 1940s to help determine what chemical and radiological contaminants have made their way into the groundwater. As regulatory requirements for monitoring increased in the 1980s, there began to be some overlap between various programs. DOE established the Groundwater Performance Assessment Project (groundwater project) in 1996 to ensure protection of the public and the environment while improving the efficiency of monitoring activities. The groundwater project is designed to support all groundwater monitoring needs at the site, eliminate redundant sampling and analysis, and establish a cost-effective hierarchy for groundwater monitoring activities. This document provides the quality assurance guidelines that will be followed by the groundwater project. This QA Plan is based on the QA requirements of DOE Order 414.1C, Quality Assurance, and 10 CFR 830, Subpart A--General Provisions/Quality Assurance Requirements as delineated in Pacific Northwest National Laboratorys Standards-Based Management System. In addition, the groundwater project is subject to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans (EPA/240/B-01/003, QA/R-5). The groundwater project has determined that the Hanford Analytical Services Quality Assurance Requirements Documents (HASQARD, DOE/RL-96-68) apply to portions of this project and to the subcontractors. HASQARD requirements are discussed within applicable sections of this plan.

Luttrell, Stuart P.

2006-05-11T23:59:59.000Z

344

Performance improvement plan use in implementing conduct of operations  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Materials Processing and Waste Management and Environmental Restoration Divisions (NMPD/WMER) of the Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) operate nineteen individual facilities at Savannah River Site (SRS). These facilities produce the fuel and target assemblies for the SRS Reactors: extract Tritium, Plutonium, Uranium and other isotopes from the irradiated fuel and targets; safely store the radioactive waste from ongoing operations; and encapsulate the waste in a final waste form for long term disposal. Continuous improvement in the operation of all facilities and in the conduct of business at SRS is the goal embodied in the NMPD/WMER Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) discussed in this document. The NMPD/WMER PIP is the mechanism used to establish a basis for operations that will lead to achievement of a performance level that will meet or exceed the standards developed and used in the commercial nuclear power industry.

Baumhardt, R.J.

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

345

Performance improvement plan use in implementing conduct of operations  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Materials Processing and Waste Management and Environmental Restoration Divisions (NMPD/WMER) of the Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) operate nineteen individual facilities at Savannah River Site (SRS). These facilities produce the fuel and target assemblies for the SRS Reactors: extract Tritium, Plutonium, Uranium and other isotopes from the irradiated fuel and targets; safely store the radioactive waste from ongoing operations; and encapsulate the waste in a final waste form for long term disposal. Continuous improvement in the operation of all facilities and in the conduct of business at SRS is the goal embodied in the NMPD/WMER Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) discussed in this document. The NMPD/WMER PIP is the mechanism used to establish a basis for operations that will lead to achievement of a performance level that will meet or exceed the standards developed and used in the commercial nuclear power industry.

Baumhardt, R.J.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

WIPP (Waste Isolation Pilot Plant) test phase plan: Performance assessment  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for managing the disposition of transuranic (TRU) wastes resulting from nuclear weapons production activities of the United States. These wastes are currently stored nationwide at several of the DOE's waste generating/storage sites. The goal is to eliminate interim waste storage and achieve environmentally and institutionally acceptable permanent disposal of these TRU wastes. The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in southeastern New Mexico is being considered as a disposal facility for these TRU wastes. This document describes the first of the following two major programs planned for the Test Phase of WIPP: Performance Assessment -- determination of the long-term performance of the WIPP disposal system in accordance with the requirements of the EPA Standard; and Operations Demonstration -- evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the DOE TRU waste management system's ability to emplace design throughput quantities of TRU waste in the WIPP underground facility. 120 refs., 19 figs., 8 tabs.

Not Available

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

Hydrogen engine performance analysis project. Second annual report  

SciTech Connect

Progress in a 3 year research program to evaluate the performance and emission characteristics of hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines is reported. Fifteen hydrogen engine configurations will be subjected to performance and emissions characterization tests. During the first two years, baseline data for throttled and unthrottled, carburetted and timed hydrogen induction, Pre IVC hydrogen-fueled engine configurations, with and without exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and water injection, were obtained. These data, along with descriptions of the test engine and its components, the test apparatus, experimental techniques, experiments performed and the results obtained, are given. Analyses of other hydrogen-engine project data are also presented and compared with the results of the present effort. The unthrottled engine vis-a-vis the throttled engine is found, in general, to exhibit higher brake thermal efficiency. The unthrottled engine also yields lower NO/sub x/ emissions, which were found to be a strong function of fuel-air equivalence ratio. (LCL)

Adt, Jr., R. R.; Swain, M. R.; Pappas, J. M.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

Annual Diversity Report 2009 -appendix 1 Section 9: Workforce Planning Statistics: New Appointments between 01/10/07-30/09/08  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Annual Diversity Report 2009 - appendix 1 Section 9: Workforce Planning Statistics: New Appointments between 01/10/07-30/09/08 Table 9.1 Workforce Planning Statistics: Ethnicity by Faculty 9.2 Workforce Planning Statistics: Disability by Faculty and Professional Service: New Appointments

Anderson, Jim

349

2006 Department of Energy Strategic Plan - Linking Strategic Goals to  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2006 Department of Energy Strategic Plan - Linking Strategic Goals 2006 Department of Energy Strategic Plan - Linking Strategic Goals to Annual Performance Goals 2006 Department of Energy Strategic Plan - Linking Strategic Goals to Annual Performance Goals Section 10 of the U.S. Department of Energy's Strategic Plan discusses Linking Strategic Goals to Annual Performance Goals through Program Assessment. DOE uses a variety of methods and tools to assess its programs. Internally, programs are required to report quarterly on their progress in meeting annual performance metrics. The data is then consolidated for senior management review. 2006 Department of Energy Strategic Plan - Linking Strategic Goals to Annual Performance Goals More Documents & Publications 2006 Department of Energy Strategic Plan U.S Department of Energy Strategic Plan

350

Retirement Plans2013 Investment Performance Review Human Resources, Support Services Building,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Western Retirement Plans2013 Investment Performance Review Human Resources, Support Services;Planning your journey to retirement with the 2013 Investment Performance Review Planning for retirement investments to meet your retirement goals. The amount of retirement income you receive will depend on your

Lennard, William N.

351

The Laboratory Performance Appraisal Process and Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan Preparation Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0136 0136 Contract No. DE-AC02-09CH11466 Section J - Appendix B J-B-1 ATTACHMENT J.2 APPENDIX B PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2014 Applicable to the Operation of the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory A Department of Energy National Laboratory Contract No. DE-AC02-09CH11466 Modification No.0136 Contract No. DE-AC02-09CH11466 Section J - Appendix B J-B-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. INTRODUCTION J-B-5 I. DETERMINING THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE RATING AND PERFORMANCE-BASED FEE AND AWARD TERM ELIGIBILITY (as applicable) J-B-5 Performance Evaluation Methodology J-B-6 Calculating Individual Goal Scores and Letter Grade J-B-8 Determining the Amount of Performance-Based Fee Earned J-B-8

352

Annual summary of Immobilized Low-Activity Waste (ILAW) Performance Assessment for 2003 Incorporating the Integrated Disposal Facility Concept  

SciTech Connect

To Erik Olds 09/30/03 - An annual summary of the adequacy of the Hanford Immobilized Low-Activity Tank Waste Performance Assessment (ILAW PA) is necessary in each year in which a full performance assessment is not issued.

MANN, F M

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

353

Maintenance Plan for the Hanford Immobilized Low-Activity Tank Waste Performance Assessment  

SciTech Connect

The plan for maintaining the Hanford Immobilized Low-Activity Tank Waste Performance Assessment (PA) is described. The plan includes expected work on PA reviews and revisions, waste reports, monitoring, other operational activities, etc.

MANN, F.M.

2000-02-09T23:59:59.000Z

354

An adaptive planner based on learning of planning performance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and reuse cases such that planning effort is saved. The system does not involve any modification of the plan being reused. This is a salient aspect of the system, since many case-based planners involve plan modification, which has been shown to be at least...

Gopal, Kreshna

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

355

2008 Annual Summary Report for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada: Review of the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses  

SciTech Connect

The Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site requires an annual review to assess the adequacy of the Performance Assessments (PAs) and Composite Analyses (CAs) for each of the facilities, with the results submitted annually to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters. The Disposal Authorization Statements for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) also require that such reviews be made and that secondary or minor unresolved issues be tracked and addressed as part of the maintenance plan. The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) performed an annual review in fiscal year (FY) 2008 by evaluating operational factors and research results that impact the continuing validity of the PAs and CAs. This annual summary report presents data and conclusions from the FY 2008 review, and determines the adequacy of the PAs and CAs. Operational factors (e.g., waste forms and containers, facility design, and waste receipts), closure plans, monitoring results, and research and development (R&D) activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the PAs. Likewise, the environmental restoration activities at the Nevada Test Site relevant to the sources of residual radioactive material that are considered in the CAs, the land-use planning, and the results of the environmental monitoring and R&D activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the CAs.

NSTec Environmental Management

2009-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

356

Performance Demonstration Program Plan for Nondestructive Assay of Drummed Wastes for the TRU Waste Characterization Program  

SciTech Connect

The Performance Demonstration Program (PDP) for Nondestructive Assay (NDA) is a test program designed to yield data on measurement system capability to characterize drummed transuranic (TRU) waste generated throughout the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. The tests are conducted periodically and provide a mechanism for the independent and objective assessment of NDA system performance and capability relative to the radiological characterization objectives and criteria of the Office of Characterization and Transportation (OCT). The primary documents requiring an NDA PDP are the Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WAC), which requires annual characterization facility participation in the PDP, and the Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD). This NDA PDP implements the general requirements of the QAPD and applicable requirements of the WAC. Measurement facilities must demonstrate acceptable radiological characterization performance through measurement of test samples comprised of pre-specified PDP matrix drum/radioactive source configurations. Measurement facilities are required to analyze the NDA PDP drum samples using the same procedures approved and implemented for routine operational waste characterization activities. The test samples provide an independent means to assess NDA measurement system performance and compliance per criteria delineated in the NDA PDP Plan. General inter-comparison of NDA measurement system performance among DOE measurement facilities and commercial NDA services can also be evaluated using measurement results on similar NDA PDP test samples. A PDP test sample consists of a 55-gallon matrix drum containing a waste matrix type representative of a particular category of the DOE waste inventory and nuclear material standards of known radionuclide and isotopic composition typical of DOE radioactive material. The PDP sample components are made available to participating measurement facilities as designated by the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO). The nuclear material type, mass and associated alpha activity of the NDA PDP radioactive standard sets have been specified and fabricated to allow assembly of PDP samples that simulate TRU alpha activity concentrations, radionuclidic/isotopic distributions and physical forms typical of the DOE TRU waste inventory. The PDP matrix drum waste matrix types were derived from an evaluation of information contained in the Transuranic Waste Baseline Inventory Report (TWBIR) to ensure representation of prevalent waste types and their associated matrix characteristics in NDA PDP testing. NDA drum analyses required by the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) may only be performed by measurement facilities that comply with the performance criteria as set forth in the NDA PDP Plan. In this document, these analyses are referred to as WIPP analyses, and the wastes on which they are performed are referred to as WIPP wastes.

Carlsbad Field Office

2005-08-03T23:59:59.000Z

357

Annual  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

19 19 th Annual Triple "E" Seminar Presented by U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory and Spectroscopy Society of Pittsburgh Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:00 a.m. Registration & Breakfast 8:30 a.m. Opening Remarks/Welcome Michael Nowak, Senior Management & Technical Advisor National Energy Technology Laboratory 8:35 a.m. Overview of Energy Issues Michael Nowak, Senior Management & Technical Advisor National Energy Technology Laboratory 8:45 a.m. Introduction of Presenters McMahan Gray National Energy Technology Laboratory 8:50 a.m. Jane Konrad, Pgh Regional Center for Science Teachers "Green - What Does it Mean" 9:45 a.m. Break 10:00 a.m. John Varine, Spectroscopy Society of Pittsburgh

358

Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Project, Operations and Maintenance and Planning and Design, 2001 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect

This report fulfills the contract obligations based on the Statement of Work (SOW) for the project as contracted with Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery (NPTH) Year-2001 annual report combines information from two contracts with a combined value of $2,336,491. They are identified by Bonneville Power Administration as follows: (1) Operations and Maintenance--Project No. 1983-350-00, Contract No. 4504, and (2) Planning and Design--Project No. 1983-350-00, Contract No. 4035. The Operations and Maintenance (O&M) budget of $2,166,110 was divided as follows: Facility Development and Fish Production Costs--$860,463; and Equipment Purchases as capital cost--$1,305,647 for equipment and subcontracts. The Planning and Design (P&D) budget of $170,381 was allocated to development of a Coho master planning document in conjunction with Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery. The O&M budget expenditures represent personnel and fish production expenses; e.g., administration, management, coordination, facility development, personnel training and fish production costs for spring Chinook and Coho salmon. Under Objective 1: Fish Culture Training and Education, tribal staff worked at Clearwater Anadromous Hatchery (CAFH) an Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) facility to produce spring Chinook smolt and parr for release that are intended to provide future broodstock for NPTH. As a training exercise, BPA allowed tribal staff to rear Coho salmon at Dworshak National Fish Hatchery, a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) facility. This statement of work allows this type of training to prepare tribal staff to later rear salmon at Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery under Task 1.6. As a subset of the O&M budget, the equipment purchase budget of $1,305,647 less $82,080 for subcontracts provides operational and portable equipment necessary for NPTH facilities after construction. The equipment budget for the year was $1,223,567; this year's purchases amounted $287,364.48 (see Table 5). Purchases are itemized in Appendix D and E. FishPro, Inc. assisted tribal staff with equipment purchases. The unspent contract balances will be carried forward to the ensuing year to complete equipment purchases essential to hatchery operations. The NPTH activities focused on completion of the Northwest Power Planning Council Step-3 decision that authorized hatchery construction. Construction began in July 2000. It is anticipated to continue through October 2002. At the end of 2001, the hatchery facilities were approximately 70% completed and the budget approximately 90% expended. The following facilities are either completed or in final stages of construction: (1) NPTH Central Hatchery facility at Site 1705, and (2) North Lapwai Valley satellite, and (3) Sweetwater Springs satellite, and (4) Yoosa-Camp satellite, and (5) Newsome Creek satellite, and (6) Lukes Gulch satellite, and (7) Cedar Flats satellite.

Larson, Roy Edward; Walker, Grant W.; Penney, Aaron K. (Nez Perce Tribe, Lapwai, ID)

2006-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

DOE Performance Report 2006.qxd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/IG-APP-008 DOE/IG-APP-008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL DOE/IG-APP-008 Annual Performance Report FY 2005 Annual Performance Plan FY 2006 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2005 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN FY 2006 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Message from the Inspector General I am pleased to present the Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year 2005 Annual Performance Report and Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Performance Plan. Our office continues to work vigorously in support of the Department and its mission. During FY 2005, we issued 99 audit and inspection reports containing recommendations for over $619 million in savings; referred 31 criminal cases for prosecution; obtained 14 convictions; recovered over $27.4 million in fines, restitutions and settlements; and,

360

Performance Measurement in Small Texas Metropolitan Planning Organizations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

for Planning (CMAP) all of which house populations of over 1.5 million residents. Medium sized MPOs include: Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) in Utah, Metroplan in Arkansas, and Metropolitan Area Planning Agency (MAPA) in Nebraska which all have... ? www.wfrc.org/cms/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=92&Itemi d=78 ? Metroplan ? www.metroplan.org/index.php?fuseaction=p0007.&mod=44 ? MAPA ? www.mapacog.org/long-range-transportation-planning ? Collier County MPO ? www...

Moore, Devin 1984-

2012-10-16T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

CY 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan - Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Reporting Office: Chief of Nuclear Safety . Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes Revision 2 of U.S. Department of Energy Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation 2004-1 established the seven core CTA responsibilities. The Office of the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) performs to following functions in support of the CTA meeting these responsibilities: 1. Nuclear Safety Requirement Concurrence and Exemption * Concur with the determination of the applicability of DOE directives involving nuclear safety included in Energy and Science contracts pursuant to Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR), 48 CFR 970.5204-2, Laws, regulations, and DOE directives, item (b). * Concur with nuclear safety requirements included in Energy and Science contracts pursuant to

362

CY 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan - Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Reporting Office: Chief of Nuclear Safety . Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes Revision 2 of U.S. Department of Energy Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation 2004-1 established the seven core CTA responsibilities. The Office of the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) performs to following functions in support of the CTA meeting these responsibilities: 1. Nuclear Safety Requirement Concurrence and Exemption * Concur with the determination of the applicability of DOE directives involving nuclear safety included in Energy and Science contracts pursuant to Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR), 48 CFR 970.5204-2, Laws, regulations, and DOE directives, item (b). * Concur with nuclear safety requirements included in Energy and Science contracts pursuant to

363

"Annual NEPA Planning Summary Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities - Environmental Impact Statements"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities - Environmental Impact Statements" "Bonneville Power Administration Annual NEPA Planning Summary Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities Environmental Impact Statements" "application/vnd.ms-excel" "#","*Title, Location","Estimated Cost","Estimated Schedule (**NEPA Milestones)",,"Description" ,"I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project Cowlitz and Clark Counties, WA and Multnomah County, OR",5000000,"Determination Date:","application/vnd.ms-excel"," Construct about 70 miles of new 500-kV line between a new proposed substation near Castle Rock, WA and an exsting BPA substation in Troutdale, OR"

364

Independent Oversight Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance, March 2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Secretary of Energys Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted a review of emergency response plans and performance at DOE Headquarters (HQ) in February 2003.

365

U.S. Department of Energy High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Implementation Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Energy High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Implementation Plan August 15, 2008 U.S. Department of Energy High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Implementation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS................................................................................................................................. iii 1 DOE COMMITMENT TO HPSB .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Federal HPSB Drivers and Commitments ........................................................................... 1 1.2 DOE-Specific HPSB Commitments .................................................................................... 2 2 DOE HPSB DIRECTIVES..................................................................................................... 3

366

The influence of team mental models and team planning on team performance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

approaches on post-planning MM similarity. Third, I examined the influence of post-planning teamwork and taskwork MM similarity on team performance. I tested these relationships with 172 three-person ad hoc teams performing a problem-solving execution task...

Leiva Neuenschwander, Pedro Ignacio

2009-06-02T23:59:59.000Z

367

Effects of different operating conditions of Gonen geothermal district heating system on its annual performance  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract In this paper, the effects of different operating conditions of the Gonen geothermal district heating system (GDHS) on its annual energy and exergy performance are investigated. The system parameters such as temperature, pressure and flow rate are monitored by using fixed and portable measuring instruments over a one-year period. Thus the main differences in the annual system operation are detected. The measurements show that the Gonen GDHS has six different operating cases depending on the outside temperature throughout the year. The energy and exergy analysis of the system is carried out for each case using the actual system parameters at the corresponding reference temperatures, which are 3.86, 7.1, 8.88, 11.83, 15.26 and 20.4C. The highest and lowest energy (57.32%, 35.64%) and exergy (55.76%, 41.42%) efficiencies of the overall system are calculated at the reference temperatures of 15.26C and 3.86C, respectively. Besides, taking the six case-based energy and exergy analyses into account, the annual average energy and exergy efficiencies are determined to be 45.24% and 47.33%, respectively.

Asiye Aslan; Bedri Yksel; Tu?rul Akyol

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

Annual performance analysis of the solar chimney power plant in Sinkiang, China  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract To obtain more accurate prediction of the annual performance of solar chimney power plants (SCPPs), a comprehensive theoretical model is developed by taking into account the hourly variation of solar radiation. The effects of the collector and chimney radii on the power output of the SCPP are analyzed, and the results reveal that a limitation on the maximum collector radius exists for the maximum attainable power output of the SCPP. Then four designs of 100MW \\{SCPPs\\} with different combinations of collector and chimney radii are proposed and the most cost effective one is chosen from among the four SCPPs. The annual power output of the chosen SCPP in the Hami region is estimated at an interval of 1h for a whole year. The results indicate that the power generation of SCPP presents obvious seasonal variation. Furthermore, the use of 14% of the unused land in the Hami region for the installation of \\{SCPPs\\} would satisfy the annual power requirement for the whole of the Sinkiang region.

Peng-hua Guo; Jing-yin Li; Yuan Wang

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

Planning, Budget, and Acquisition | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Planning, Budget, and Acquisition Planning, Budget, and Acquisition Planning, Budget, and Acquisition The Office of Legacy Management's (LM) Planning, Budget, and Acquisition (PBA) Team performs the following management functions: Plans, develops, and implements improvements in efficiencies of business processes and identifies opportunities for reengineering or restructuring. Plans, develops, and implements strategic planning efforts, which include analyzing the organization's annual and long-term goals and the best approach for achieving those goals. Plans, develops, and implements budget formulation processes to include identifying future spending priorities and assessing the effectiveness of programs. Plans, develops, and implements processes for budget execution, including day-to-day obligations for agency expenditures, invoices, billing

370

2009 Annual Summary Report for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada: Review of the Performance Assessments and Composite Analysis  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office performed an annual review of the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Wate Management Site (RWMS) Performance Assessments (PAs) and Composite Analyses (CAs) in fiscal year (FY) 2009. This annual summary report presents data and conclusions from the FY 2009 review, and determines the adequacy of the PAs and CAs. Operational factors (e.g., waste forms and containers, facility design, and waste receipts), closure plans, monitoring results, and research and development (R&D) activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the PAs. Likewise, the environmental restoration activities at the Nevada Test Site relevant to the sources of residual radioactive material that are considered in the CAs, the land-use planning, and the results of the environmental monitoring and R&D activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the CAs.

NSTec Environmental Management

2010-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

371

Planning and Reporting for Operations and Maintenance in Federal Energy Savings Performance Contracts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Guidelines describe the Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Working Group on planning and reporting for O&M during the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOEs) energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs).

372

DOE/NNSA Strategic Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) FOR MANAGEMENT...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Services Pantex, LLC Contract Number: DE-AC54-00AL66620 Performance period: October 01, 2013 through September 30, 2014 J D. Woolery P e dent and General Manager B cock & Wilcox...

373

Savannah River Site Approved Site Treatment Plan, 2001 Annual Update (Volumes I and II)  

SciTech Connect

The Compliance Plan Volume (Volume I) identifies project activity scheduled milestones for achieving compliance with Land Disposal Restrictions. Information regarding the technical evaluation of treatment options for SRS mixed wastes is contained in the Background Volume (Volume II) and is provided for information.

Lawrence, B.

2001-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

374

DynCorp Tricities Services, Inc. Hanford fire department FY 1998 annual work plan  

SciTech Connect

The mission of the Hanford Fire Department (HFD) is to support the safe and timely cleanup of the Hanford site by providing fire suppression, fire prevention, emergency rescue, emergency medical service, and hazardous materials response; and to be capable of dealing with and terminating emergency situations which could threaten the operations, employees, or interest of the U.S. Department of Energy operated Hanford site. This includes response to surrounding fire departments/districts under mutual aid and state mobilization agreements and fire fighting, hazardous materials, and ambulance support to Washington Public Power Supply System (Supply System) and various commercial entities operating on site through Requests for Service from DOE-RL. This fire department also provides site fire marshal overview authority, fire system testing and maintenance, respiratory protection services, building tours and inspections, ignitable and reactive waste site inspections, prefire planning, and employee fire prevention education. This plan provides a program overview, program baselines, and schedule baseline.

Good, D.E.

1997-08-19T23:59:59.000Z

375

Planning and Reporting for Operations and Maintenance in Federal Energy Savings Performance Contracts  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

11.4 11.4 Planning and Reporting for O&M in Federal ESPCs Planning and Reporting for Operations & Maintenance in Federal Energy Saving Performance Contracts Prepared by: Operations and Maintenance Working Group Approved by: Federal ESPC Steering Committee M&V - 3 Planning and Reporting for O&M in Federal ESPCs CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ...................................................................... 1 1.1 OVERVIEW OF O&M ISSUES IN ESPCS ................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Key Issues, Timing, and Available Guidance on O&M in Federal ESPCs .................................................................................................................. 2 2. STEPS OF MANAGING O&M RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................... 3

376

Planning and Reporting for Operations and Maintenance in Federal Energy Savings Performance Contracts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11.4 11.4 Planning and Reporting for O&M in Federal ESPCs Planning and Reporting for Operations & Maintenance in Federal Energy Saving Performance Contracts Prepared by: Operations and Maintenance Working Group Approved by: Federal ESPC Steering Committee M&V - 3 Planning and Reporting for O&M in Federal ESPCs CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ...................................................................... 1 1.1 OVERVIEW OF O&M ISSUES IN ESPCS ................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Key Issues, Timing, and Available Guidance on O&M in Federal ESPCs .................................................................................................................. 2 2. STEPS OF MANAGING O&M RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................... 3

377

CY 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA HQ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Reporting Office: NNSA NA-40 Section One - Current Mission (s) of the Organization and Potential Changes 1. The Office of Emergency Operations (NA-40) administers and directs DOE and NNSA programs for emergency response capabilities to ensure availability and viability to respond to emergencies at DOE and NNSA facilities and field sites, and to nuclear and radiological emergencies within the United States and abroad. NA-40 is also responsible for the development of Departmental policy and guidance, technical assistance, and supporting implementation of emergency management planning, preparedness, readiness assurance, and response activities within DOE and NNSA. Additionally, NA-40 implements Program Secretarial Officer (PSO) responsibilities for Emergency

378

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA NA-40  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Reporting Office: NNSA NA-40 Section One - Current Mission (s) of the Organization and Potential Changes. 1. The Office of Emergency Operations (NA-40) administers and directs DOE and NNSA programs for emergency response capabilities to ensure availability and viability to respond to emergencies at DOE and NNSA facilities and field sites, and to nuclear and radiological emergencies within the United States and abroad. NA-40 is also responsible for the development of Departmental policy and guidance, technical assistance, and supporting implementation of emergency management planning, preparedness, readiness assurance, and response activities within DOE and NNSA. 2. NA-40 has no nuclear or radiological facilities under its cognizance; however,

379

ANNUAL REVIEW FACTSHEET WORKFLOW  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

that the PhD has updated his T&SP (15. Second annual review). The PhD and the Promotor have to plan a date for the second annual review and the PhD has to enter that date in ProDoc (20 Date second annual review plannedANNUAL REVIEW FACTSHEET WORKFLOW PhD Candidate / Promotor / Dean / TGS / Doctorate Board / Pro

Twente, Universiteit

380

Performance Assessment Monitoring Plan for the Hanford Site Low-Level Burial Grounds  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, requires a disposal authorization statement authorizing operation (or continued operation) for low-level waste disposal facilities. In fulfillment of these requirements, a disposal authorization statement was issued on October 25, 1999, authorizing the Hanford Site to transfer, receive, possess, and dispose of low-level radioactive waste at the 200 East Area burial grounds and the 200 West Area burial grounds. One of the conditions is that monitoring plans for the 200 East Area and 200 West Area low-level burial grounds be written and approved by the Richland Operations Office. As a result of a record of decision for the Hanford Site Solid Waste Program and acceptance of the Hanford Site Solid Waste Environmental Impact Statement, the use of the low-level burial ground (LLBG) as a disposal facility for low-level and mixed low-level wastes has been restricted to lined trenches and the Navy reactor-compartment trench only. Hence, as of July 2004, only the two lined trenches in burial ground 218-W-5 (trenches 31 and 34, see Appendix A) and the Navy reactor-compartment trench in burial ground 218 E 12B (trench 94) are allowed to receive waste. When the two lined trenches are filled, the LLBG will cease to operate except for reactor compartment disposal at trench 94. Remaining operational lifetime of the LLBG is dependent on waste volume disposal rates. Existing programs for air sampling and analyses and subsidence monitoring are currently adequate for performance assessment at the LLBG. The waste disposal authorization for the Hanford Site is based (in part) on the post-closure performance assessments for the LLBG. In order to maintain a useful link between operational monitoring (e.g., Resource Conservation and Recovery Act [RCRA], Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and State Waste Discharge Permits), constituents, monitoring frequencies, and boundaries require regular review and comparison. The annual reports discussed here are the primary sources for these reviews. The pathways of interest are air and groundwater for both operational and post-closure conditions at the LLBG, with groundwater considered to be the most significant long-term exposure pathway. Constituents that contributed at least 0.1% of the total relative hazard were selected as target analytes for monitoring. These are technetium-99, uranium, and iodine-129. Because of its environmental unavailability, carbon 14 was removed from the list of constituents. Given the potential uncertainties in inventories at the 200 Area LLBG and the usefulness of tritium as a contaminant indicator, tritium will be monitored as a constituent of concern at all burial grounds. Preexisting contamination plumes in groundwater beneath low-level waste management areas are attributed to other past-practice liquid waste disposal sites. Groundwater and air will be sampled and analyzed for radiogenic components. Subsidence monitoring will also be performed on a regular basis. The existing near-facility and surveillance air monitoring programs are sufficient to satisfy the performance assessment monitoring. Groundwater monitoring will utilize the existing network of wells at the LLBG, and co-sampling with RCRA groundwater monitoring, to be sampled semiannually. Installation of additional wells is currently underway to replace wells that have gone dry.

None

2006-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Nevada Test Site site treatment plan, final annual update. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

A Site Treatment Plan (STP) is required for facilities at which the US Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) generates or stores mixed waste (MW), defined by the Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFCAct) as waste containing both a hazardous waste subject to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and a radioactive material subject to the Atomic Energy Act. This STP was written to identify specific treatment facilities for treating DOE/NV generated MW and provides proposed implementation schedules. This STP was approved by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) and provided the basis for the negotiation and issuance of the FFCAct Consent Order (CO) dated March 6, 1996. The FFCAct CO sets forth stringent regulatory requirements to comply with the implementation of the STP.

NONE

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

382

2007 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect

This annual report includes: a brief overview of Western; FY 2007 highlights; FY 2007 Integrated Resource Planning, or IRP, survey; and financial data.

none,

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

383

Hanford fire department FY 99 annual work plan WBS 6.5.7  

SciTech Connect

The mission of the Hanford Fire Department (HFD) is to support the safe and timely cleanup of the Hanford site by providing a full range of services at the lowest possible cost to customers. These services include fire suppression, fire prevention, emergency rescue, emergency medical service, and hazardous materials response; and to be capable of dealing with and terminating emergency situations which could threaten the operations, employees, the general public, or interest of the U. S. Department of Energy operated Hanford Site. This includes response to surrounding fire departments/districts under mutual aid and state mobilization agreements and fire fighting, hazardous materials, and ambulance support to Washington Public Power Supply System (Supply System) and various commercial entities operating on site through Requests for Service from DOE-RL. The fire department also provides site fire marshal overview authority, fire system testing and maintenance, respiratory protection services, building tours and inspections, ignitable and reactive waste site inspections, prefire planning, and employee fire prevention education.

GOOD, D.E.

1999-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

384

Annual Report on U.S. Wind Power Installation, Cost, and Performance Trends: 2006  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Annual Report on U.S. Wind Power Installation, Cost, and3 U.S. Wind Power Capacity Increased by 27% inAre Significant. . . . . . . 9 Wind Power Prices Are Up in

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

Real-Time Path Planning and Terrain Obstacle Performance for General Aviation Aircraft  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Scope Proposed Solution: 1. Search Space 2. Basic Search Algorithm 3. Performance Improvement Techniques Near all-weather accessibility to 5,400 public-use airports? 5400 Public Use Airports Of 5,400 public, Valavanis, Tsourveloudis, Kostaras) Motion-library based trajectory planning (Richards, Ward) Simplified

Valasek, John

386

Plan  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

New well Beatty Water and Sewer 2 Community Well Beatty 365412 1164518 Ie Annual Cherry Patch Well 2 Domestic Well Amargosa Valley 362929 1160857 Ie 3 years New well Cind-R-Lite...

387

FTCP Plans & Reports | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Plans & Reports Plans & Reports FTCP Plans & Reports Biennial Report FTCP Biennial Report - Calendar Years 2011-2012 FTCP Biennial Report - Calendar Years 2009-2010 Annual Reports FTCP Annual Report - Calendar Year 2008 FTCP Annual Report - Calendar Year 2007 FTCP Annual Report - Fiscal Year 2004 FTCP Annual Report - Fiscal Year 2002 Status Report FTCP Senior Technical Safety Manager (STSM) Status Report Annual Plans FTCP Annual Plan - Fiscal Year 2005 FTCP Annual Plan - Fiscal Year 2004 FTCP Annual Plan - Fiscal Year 2003 FTCP Annual Plan - Fiscal Year 2002 Operational Plans FTCP Operational Plan and Closeout Summary, Fiscal Year 2012 FTCP Operational Plan and Closeout Summary, Fiscal Year 2011 FTCP OPERATIONAL PLAN and Summary, FISCAL YEAR 2010 FTCP OPERATIONAL PLAN and Closeout Summary, FISCAL YEAR 2009

388

Annual Performance Report and Plan FY12 FY13 FY14  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Carbon Fiber Technology Center The Department of Energy's International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) Responsibilities Depleted Uranium Operations at...

389

Sample M&V Plan from the Texas Workshop: Preparing and Evaluating Measurement and Verification Plans for Energy Performance Contracts in Texas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This document contains a sample M&V plan that has been prepared in accordance with the Texas Guidelines for Measurement and Verification for Energy Performance Contracts. This sample M&V plan was extracted from the March 1999 workshop, entitled...

Haberl, J. S.

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

Annual Report on U.S. Wind Power Installation, Cost, and Performance Trends: 2006  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Results from Major Wind Integration Studies Completed 2003-a mini- mum) show that wind integration costs are generallyA number of additional wind integration analyses are planned

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

Performance Demonstration Program Plan for RCRA Constituent Analysis of Solidified Wastes  

SciTech Connect

The Performance Demonstration Program (PDP) for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) constituents distributes test samples for analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and metals in solid matrices. Each distribution of test samples is termed a PDP cycle. These evaluation cycles provide an objective measure of the reliability of measurements performed for transuranic (TRU) waste characterization. The primary documents governing the conduct of the PDP are the Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD; DOE/CBFO-94-1012) and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Waste Analysis Plan (WAP) contained in the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (NM4890139088-TSDF) issued by the New Mexico Environment Department. The WAP requires participation in the PDP; the PDP must comply with the QAPD and the WAP. This plan implements the general requirements of the QAPD and the applicable requirements of the WAP for the RCRA PDP. Participating laboratories demonstrate acceptable performance by successfully analyzing single- blind performance evaluation samples (subsequently referred to as PDP samples) according to the criteria established in this plan. PDP samples are used as an independent means to assess laboratory performance regarding compliance with the WAP quality assurance objectives (QAOs). The concentrations of analytes in the PDP samples address levels of regulatory concern and encompass the range of concentrations anticipated in waste characterization samples. The WIPP requires analyses of homogeneous solid wastes to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements. These analyses must be performed by laboratories that demonstrate acceptable performance in this PDP. These analyses are referred to as WIPP analyses, and the samples on which they are performed are referred to as WIPP samples. Participating laboratories must analyze PDP samples using the same procedures used for WIPP samples.

Carlsbad Field Office

2006-09-21T23:59:59.000Z

392

Annual Report on U.S. Wind Power Installation, Cost, and Performance Trends: 2007  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 7 Contents Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 U.S. Wind Power Capacity Surged by 46% in 2007, with 5,329 MW Added and $9 Billion Invested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Wind Power Contributed 35% of All New U.S. Electric Generating Capacity in 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 The United States Continued to Lead the World in Annual Capacity Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Texas Easily Exceeded Other States in Annual Capacity Growth . . . . . . .6 Data from Interconnection Queues Demonstrate that an Enormous Amount of Wind Capacity Is Under Development . . . . . . . . . .9 GE Wind Remained the Dominant Turbine Manufacturer, but a Growing Number of Other Manufacturers Are Capturing Market Share .

393

Annual Report on U.S. Wind Power Installation, Cost, and Performance Trends: 2006  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 Contents Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 U.S. Wind Power Capacity Increased by 27% in 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 The United States Leads the World in Annual Capacity Growth . . . . . . . .4 Texas, Washington, and California Lead the U.S. in Annual Capacity Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 GE Wind Is the Dominant Turbine Manufacturer, with Siemens Gaining Market Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Average Turbine Size Continues to Increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Developer Consolidation Accelerates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Innovation and Competition in Non-Utility Wind Financing Persists . . . .9 Utility Interest in Wind Asset Ownership Strengthens; Community Wind Grows Modestly . . . . . . . . . . . .

394

Improving DOE Project Performance Using the DOD Integrated Master Plan - 12481  

SciTech Connect

DOE O 413 measures a project's progress to plan by the consumption of funding, the passage of time, and the meeting of milestones. In March of 2003, then Under Secretary, Energy, Science, Card received a memo directing the implementation of Project Management and the Project Management Manual, including the Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule. This directive states 'the integrated master plan and schedule tie together all project tasks by showing their logical relationships and any constraints controlling the start or finish of each task. This process results in a hierarchy of related functional and layered schedules derived from the Work Breakdown Structure that can be used for monitoring and controlling project progress'. This paper shows how restoring the IMP/IMS paradigm to DOE program management increases the probability of program success in ways not currently available using DOD O 413 processes alone. Using DOE O 413 series guidance, adding the Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule paradigm would provide a hierarchical set of performance measures for each 'package of work,' that provides measurable visibility to the increasing maturity of the project. This measurable maturity provides the mechanism to forecast future performance of cost, schedule, and technical outcomes in ways not available using just the activities in DOE O 413. With this information project managers have another tool available to address the issues identified in GAO-07-336 and GAO-09-406. (authors)

Alleman, Glen B. [DOD Programs, Project Time and Cost (United States); Nosbisch, Michael R. [Managing Principle, Western Region, Project Time and Cost (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

395

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Energy Reports and Performance Annual Energy Reports and Performance Published Annual Reports Visit the FEMP Library to search for read FEMP Annual Reports to Congress on Federal Government Energy Management. For more information, contact Chris Tremper. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers information and data sets illustrating Federal agencies' annual progress in meeting facility energy goals. Additional detail about each agency's performance can be found in their Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans on the Performance.Gov website. Federal Facility Efficiency Investment and Progress toward Sustainability Goals: Get an overview of Federal progress made in facility energy management and sustainability based on preliminary fiscal year (FY) 2012 reported findings. (For facility-level data reported under Section 432 of EISA, see EISA CTS Reports and Data.)

396

Annual measured performance of building-integrated solar energy systems in demonstration low-energy solar house  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper presents the details of the output and efficiency of the annual performance of building-integrated solar energy systems for a solar water heating system and solar photovoltaic (PV) modules of a demonstration near-zero-energy solar house that was constructed on the campus of the Korea Institute of Energy Research. The thermal systems installed in the house were a solar water heating system with building-integrated solar collectors for water heating and for part of the space heating and a ground-coupled heat pump for space cooling and part of the space heating. Solar PV modules were installed on the roof of the house. The performance of these systems was monitored for more than 1 yr. The annual efficiencies of the building's integrated solar collectors and solar PV were 22.8% and 10.9% respectively. The total annual solar fraction of the solar heating system was 69.7% with an annual solar heat production of 248?kW h/m2. This paper also focuses on the efficiency of the house's solar storage based upon intentionally varied drainage of hot water from the storage tank. It was found that the thermal loss from the solar storage tank has a strong functional relationship with the thermal demand of the solar storage tank per unit volume. For example when the hot water consumption was reduced by half during September the thermal loss increased to more than 70% which would otherwise have been around 30%.

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

397

FTCP Annual Report - Fiscal Year 2004 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 FTCP Annual Report - Fiscal Year 2004 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is committed to ensuring employees are trained and technically capable of performing their duties. In pursuit of this objective, the Secretary of Energy issued DOE Policy 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Policy for Defense Nuclear Facilities, to institutionalize the Federal Technical Capability Program. Report summarizes the yearly actions taken to ensure organizations maintain their critical technical capabilities needed for the safe operations of defense nuclear facilities. FTCP 2004 Annual Report More Documents & Publications FTCP Annual Plan - Fiscal Year 2005 Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Sandia Site Office FTCP Annual Report - Calendar Year 2007

398

Integration plan required by performance agreement SM 7.2.1  

SciTech Connect

Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. and its major subcontractors are in agreement that environmental monitoring performed under the Project Hanford Management Contract is to be done in accordance with a single, integrated program. The purpose of this Integration Plan for Environmental Monitoring is to document the policies, systems, and processes being put in place to meet one key objective: manage and integrate a technically competent, multi-media ambient environmental monitoring program, in an efficient, cost effective manner. Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. and its major subcontractors also commit to conducting business in a manner consistent with the International Standards Organization 14000 Environmental Management System concepts. Because the integration of sitewide groundwater monitoring activities is managed by the Environmental Restoration Contractor, groundwater monitoring it is outside the scope of this document. Therefore, for the purpose of this Integration Plan for Environmental Monitoring, the Integrated Environmental Monitoring Program is defined as applicable to all environmental media except groundwater. This document provides recommendations on future activities to better integrate the overall environmental monitoring program, with emphasis on the near-field program. In addition, included is the Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. team review of the environmental monitoring activities on the Hanford Site, with concurrence of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Bechtel Hanford, Inc. (The narrative provided later in the Discussion Section describes the review and consideration given to each topic.) This document was developed to meet the requirements of the Project Hanford Management Contract performance agreement (SM7.2) and the tenets of the U.S. Department of Energy's Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Planning Process. This Plan is prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Environmental Assurance, Permits, and Policy Division to complete the requirements specified in the Performance Expectation 7.2.1, within the SM7 Environmental, Safety, and Health section of the Project Hanford Management Contract.

Diediker, L.P.

1997-03-28T23:59:59.000Z

399

Program Plan for Revision of the Z-Area Saltstone Disposal Facility Performance Assessment  

SciTech Connect

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) and the Saltstone Project, are embarking on the next revision to the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF) performance assessment (PA). This program plan has been prepared to outline the general approach, scope, schedule and resources for the PA revision. The plan briefly describes the task elements of the PA process. It discusses critical PA considerations in the development of conceptual models and interpretation of results. Applicable quality assurance (QA) requirements are identified and the methods for implementing QA for both software and documentation are described. The plan identifies project resources supporting the core team and providing project oversight. Program issues and risks are identified as well as mitigation of those risks. Finally, a preliminary program schedule has been developed and key deliverables identified. A number of significant changes have been implemented since the last PA revision resulting in a new design for future SDF disposal units. This revision will encompass the existing and planned disposal units, PA critical radionuclides and exposure pathways important to SDF performance. An integrated analysis of the overall facility layout, including all disposal units, will be performed to assess the impact of plume overlap on PA results. Finally, a rigorous treatment of uncertainty will be undertaken using probabilistic simulations. This analysis will be reviewed and approved by DOE-SR, DOE-HQ and potentially the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This revision will be completed and ready for the start of the DOE review at the end of December 2006. This work supports a Saltstone Vault 2 fee-bearing milestone. This milestone includes completion of the Vault 2 module of the PA revision by the end of FY06.

Cook, James R.

2005-12-07T23:59:59.000Z

400

Impact of Pilot Light Modeling on the Predicted Annual Performance of Residential Gas Water Heaters: Preprint  

SciTech Connect

Modeling residential water heaters with dynamic simulation models can provide accurate estimates of their annual energy consumption, if the units? characteristics and use conditions are known. Most gas storage water heaters (GSWHs) include a standing pilot light. It is generally assumed that the pilot light energy will help make up standby losses and have no impact on the predicted annual energy consumption. However, that is not always the case. The gas input rate and conversion efficiency of a pilot light for a GSWH were determined from laboratory data. The data were used in simulations of a typical GSWH with and without a pilot light, for two cases: 1) the GSWH is used alone; and 2) the GSWH is the second tank in a solar water heating (SWH) system. The sensitivity of wasted pilot light energy to annual hot water use, climate, and installation location was examined. The GSWH used alone in unconditioned space in a hot climate had a slight increase in energy consumption. The GSWH with a pilot light used as a backup to an SWH used up to 80% more auxiliary energy than one without in hot, sunny locations, from increased tank losses.

Maguire, J.; Burch, J.

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

2013 Annual Summary Report for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada; Review of the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses  

SciTech Connect

The Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site (National Security Technologies, LLC 2007a) requires an annual review to assess the adequacy of the performance assessments (PAs) and composite analyses (CAs), with the results submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management. The Disposal Authorization Statements for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) also require that such reviews be made and that secondary or minor unresolved issues be tracked and addressed as part of the maintenance plan (DOE 1999a, 2000). The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office performed an annual review of the Area 3 and Area 5 RWMS PAs and CAs for fiscal year (FY) 2013. This annual summary report presents data and conclusions from the FY 2013 review, and determines the adequacy of the PAs and CAs. Operational factors (e.g., waste forms and containers, facility design, and waste receipts), closure plans, monitoring results, and research and development (R&D) activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the PAs. Likewise, the environmental restoration activities at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) relevant to the sources of residual radioactive material that are considered in the CAs, the land-use planning, and the results of the environmental monitoring and R&D activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the CAs. Important developments in FY 2013 include the following: Development of a new Area 5 RWMS closure inventory estimate based on disposals through FY 2013 Evaluation of new or revised waste streams by special analysis Development of version 4.115 of the Area 5 RWMS GoldSim PA/CA model The Area 3 RWMS has been in inactive status since July 1, 2006, with the last shipment received in April 2006. The FY 2013 review of operations, facility design, closure plans, monitoring results, and R&D results for the Area 3 RWMS indicates no changes that would impact PA validity. The conclusion of the annual review is that all performance objectives can be met and the Area 3 RWMS PA remains valid. There is no need to the revise the Area 3 RWMS PA. Review of Area 5 RWMS operations, design, closure plans, monitoring results, and R&D activities indicates that no significant changes have occurred. The FY 2013 PA results, generated with the Area 5 RWMS v4.115 GoldSim PA model, indicate that there continues to be a reasonable expectation of meeting all performance objectives. The results and conclusions of the Area 5 RWMS PA are judged valid, and there is no need to the revise the PA. A review of changes potentially impacting the CAs indicates that no significant changes occurred in FY 2013. The continuing adequacy of the CAs was evaluated with the new models, and no significant changes that would alter the CAs results or conclusions were found. The revision of the Area 3 RWMS CA, which will include the Yucca Flat Underground Test Area (Corrective Action Unit [CAU] 97) source term, is scheduled for FY 2024, following the completion of the Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan in FY 2015. Inclusion of the Frenchman Flat Underground Test Area (CAU 98) results in the Area 5 RWMS CA is scheduled for FY 2016, pending the completion of the CAU 98 Closure Report in FY 2015. Near-term R&D efforts will focus on continuing development of the PA, CA, and inventory models for the Area 3 and Area 5 RWMS.

Shott, Gregory [NSTec] [NSTec

2014-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

Performance demonstration program plan for RCRA constituent analysis of solidified wastes  

SciTech Connect

Performance Demonstration Programs (PDPS) are designed to help ensure compliance with the Quality Assurance Objectives (QAOs) for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The PDPs are intended for use by the Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Area Office (CAO) to assess and approve the laboratories and other measurement facilities supplying services for the characterization of WIPP TRU waste. The PDPs may also be used by CAO in qualifying laboratories proposing to supply additional analytical services that are required for other than waste characterization, such as WIPP site operations. The purpose of this PDP is to test laboratory performance for the analysis of solidified waste samples for TRU waste characterization. This performance will be demonstrated by the successful analysis of blind audit samples of simulated, solidified TRU waste according to the criteria established in this plan. Blind audit samples (hereinafter referred to as PDP samples) will be used as an independent means to assess laboratory performance regarding compliance with the QAOs. The concentration of analytes in the PDP samples will address levels of regulatory concern and will encompass the range of concentrations anticipated in actual waste characterization samples. Analyses that are required by the WIPP to demonstrate compliance with various regulatory requirements and which are included in the PDP must be performed by laboratories that demonstrate acceptable performance in the PDP. These analyses are referred to as WIPP analyses and the samples on which they are performed are referred to as WIPP samples for the balance of this document.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

403

Vehicle Technologies Office: Annual Progress Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Progress Reports Annual Progress Reports to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Annual Progress Reports on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: Annual Progress Reports on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Annual Progress Reports on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Annual Progress Reports on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: Annual Progress Reports on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: Annual Progress Reports on AddThis.com... Publications Key Publications Plans & Roadmaps Partnership Documents Annual Progress Reports Success Stories Conferences Proceedings Newsletters Analysis Software Tools Awards & Patents Glossary Annual Progress Reports 2013 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review

404

2006 Annual Report: Discovering Solutions  

SciTech Connect

This annual report includes: a brief overview of Western; FY 2006 highlights; FY 2006 Integrated Resource Planning, or IRP, summary; and financial data.

none,

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

NEUTRON MULTIPLICITY AND ACTIVE WELL NEUTRON COINCIDENCE VERIFICATION MEASUREMENTS PERFORMED FOR MARCH 2009 SEMI-ANNUAL DOE INVENTORY  

SciTech Connect

The Analytical Development (AD) Section field nuclear measurement group performed six 'best available technique' verification measurements to satisfy a DOE requirement instituted for the March 2009 semi-annual inventory. The requirement of (1) yielded the need for SRNL Research Operations Department Material Control & Accountability (MC&A) group to measure the Pu content of five items and the highly enrich uranium (HEU) content of two. No 14Q-qualified measurement equipment was available to satisfy the requirement. The AD field nuclear group has routinely performed the required Confirmatory Measurements for the semi-annual inventories for fifteen years using sodium iodide and high purity germanium (HpGe) {gamma}-ray pulse height analysis nondestructive assay (NDA) instruments. With appropriate {gamma}-ray acquisition modeling, the HpGe spectrometers can be used to perform verification-type quantitative assay for Pu-isotopics and HEU content. The AD nuclear NDA group is widely experienced with this type of measurement and reports content for these species in requested process control, MC&A booking, and holdup measurements assays Site-wide. However none of the AD HpGe {gamma}-ray spectrometers have been 14Q-qualified, and the requirement of reference 1 specifically excluded a {gamma}-ray PHA measurement from those it would accept for the required verification measurements. The requirement of reference 1 was a new requirement for which the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) Research Operations Department (ROD) MC&A group was unprepared. The criteria for exemption from verification were: (1) isotope content below 50 grams; (2) intrinsically tamper indicating or TID sealed items which contain a Category IV quantity of material; (3) assembled components; and (4) laboratory samples. Therefore all (SRNL) Material Balance Area (MBA) items with greater than 50 grams total Pu or greater than 50 grams HEU were subject to a verification measurement. The pass/fail criteria of reference 7 stated 'The facility will report measured values, book values, and statistical control limits for the selected items to DOE SR...', and 'The site/facility operator must develop, document, and maintain measurement methods for all nuclear material on inventory'. These new requirements exceeded SRNL's experience with prior semi-annual inventory expectations, but allowed the AD nuclear field measurement group to demonstrate its excellent adaptability and superior flexibility to respond to unpredicted expectations from the DOE customer. The requirements yielded five SRNL items subject to Pu verification and two SRNL items subject to HEU verification. These items are listed and described in Table 1.

Dewberry, R.; Ayers, J.; Tietze, F.; Klapper, K.

2010-02-05T23:59:59.000Z

406

Integrated approach towards the application of horizontal wells to improve waterflooding performance. Annual progress report, January 1, 1996--December 31, 1996  

SciTech Connect

This annual report describes the progress during the fourth year of the project on {open_quotes}Integrated Approach Towards the Application of Horizontal Wells to Improve Waterflooding Performance{close_quotes}. The project involves using an integrated approach to characterize the reservoir followed by proposing an appropriate reservoir management strategy to improve the field performance. In the first stage of the project, the type of data we integrated include cross borehole seismic surveys, geological interpretation based on the logs and the cores, and the engineering information. In contrast, during the second stage of the project, we intend to use only conventional data to construct the reservoir description. This report covers the results of the implementation from the first stage of the project. It also discusses the work accomplished so far for the second stage of the project. The production from the Self Unit (location of Stage 1) has sustained an increase of 30 bbls/day over a year with an additional increase anticipated with further implementation. We have collected available core, log and production data from Section 16 in the Berryhill Glenn Unit and have finished the geological description. Based on the geological description and the associated petrophysical properties, we have developed a new indexing procedure for identifying the areas with the most potential. We are also investigating an adjoining tract formerly operated by Chevron where successful miceller-polymer flood was conducted. This will help us in evaluating the reasons for the success of the flood. Armed with this information, we will conduct a detailed geostatistical and flow simulation study and recommend the best reservoir management plan to improve the recovery of the field.

Kelkar, M.; Liner, C.; Kerr, D.

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Performance Demonstration Program Plan for Nondestructive Assay for the TRU Waste Characterization Program. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

The Performance Demonstration Program (PDP) for Nondestructive Assay (NDA) consists of a series of tests conducted on a regular frequency to evaluate the capability for nondestructive assay of transuranic (TRU) waste throughout the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. Each test is termed a PDP cycle. These evaluation cycles provide an objective measure of the reliability of measurements performed with TRU waste characterization systems. Measurement facility performance will be demonstrated by the successful analysis of blind audit samples according to the criteria set by this Program Plan. Intercomparison between measurement groups of the DOE complex will be achieved by comparing the results of measurements on similar or identical blind samples reported by the different measurement facilities. Blind audit samples (hereinafter referred to as PDP samples) will be used as an independent means to assess the performance of measurement groups regarding compliance with established Quality Assurance Objectives (QAOs). As defined for this program, a PDP sample consists of a 55-gallon matrix drum emplaced with radioactive standards and fabricated matrix inserts. These PDP sample components, once manufactured, will be secured and stored at each participating measurement facility designated and authorized by Carlsbad Area Office (CAO) under secure conditions to protect them from loss, tampering, or accidental damage.

None

1997-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

Performance Demonstration Program Plan for Nondestructive Assay of Drummed Wastes for the TRU Waste Characterization Program  

SciTech Connect

The Performance Demonstration Program (PDP) for nondestructive assay (NDA) consists of a series of tests to evaluate the capability for NDA of transuranic (TRU) waste throughout the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. Each test is termed a PDP cycle. These evaluation cycles provide an objective measure of the reliability of measurements obtained from NDA systems used to characterize the radiological constituents of TRU waste. The primary documents governing the conduct of the PDP are the Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WAC; DOE 1999a) and the Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD; DOE 1999b). The WAC requires participation in the PDP; the PDP must comply with the QAPD and the WAC. The WAC contains technical and quality requirements for acceptable NDA. This plan implements the general requirements of the QAPD and applicable requirements of the WAC for the NDA PDP. Measurement facilities demonstrate acceptable performance by the successful testing of simulated waste containers according to the criteria set by this PDP Plan. Comparison among DOE measurement groups and commercial assay services is achieved by comparing the results of measurements on similar simulated waste containers reported by the different measurement facilities. These tests are used as an independent means to assess the performance of measurement groups regarding compliance with established quality assurance objectives (QAO's). Measurement facilities must analyze the simulated waste containers using the same procedures used for normal waste characterization activities. For the drummed waste PDP, a simulated waste container consists of a 55-gallon matrix drum emplaced with radioactive standards and fabricated matrix inserts. These PDP sample components are distributed to the participating measurement facilities that have been designated and authorized by the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO). The NDA Drum PDP materials are stored at these sites under secure conditions to protect them from loss, tampering, or accidental damage. Using removable PDP radioactive standards, isotopic activities in the simulated waste containers are varied to the extent possible over the range of concentrations anticipated in actual waste characterization situations. Manufactured matrices simulate expected waste matrix conditions and provide acceptable consistency in the sample preparation process at each measurement facility. Analyses that are required by the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) to demonstrate compliance with various regulatory requirements and that are included in the PDP may only be performed by measurement facilities that demonstrate acceptable performance in the PDP. These analyses are referred to as WIPP analyses, and the wastes on which they are performed are referred to as WIPP wastes in this document.

DOE Carlsbad Field Office

2001-04-06T23:59:59.000Z

409

School of Natural Sciences and Psychology Report on module performance for Annual Monitoring Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

% overall and a >90% pass rate at the first attempt. Whilst the overall performance was highly satisfactory Leader: Jason Kirby Programmes for which this module is core/option (list): Physical Geography, Geography. These issues are explored below. 2. Overall assessment of performance ­ please give the mean mark and % pass

Brown, Richard

410

A Handbook for Planning and Conducting Charrettes for High-Performance Projects, 2nd edition  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC A Handbook for Planning and Conducting Charrettes for High-Performance Projects ii NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring

411

Evidence-Based Background Material Underlying Guidance for Federal Agencies in Implementing Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3/107 3/107 Evidence-Based Background Material Underlying Guidance for Federal Agencies in Implementing Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans Implementing Sustainability: The Institutional-Behavioral Dimension Elizabeth L. Malone Tom Sanquist Amy K. Wolfe Rick Diamond Christopher Payne Jerry Dion January 2011 (Updated June 2013) Federal Energy Management Program U.S. Department of Energy DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge. Web site http://www.osti.gov/bridge Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source. National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road

412

Evidence-Based Background Material Underlying Guidance for Federal Agencies in Implementing Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3/107 3/107 Evidence-Based Background Material Underlying Guidance for Federal Agencies in Implementing Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans Implementing Sustainability: The Institutional-Behavioral Dimension Elizabeth L. Malone Tom Sanquist Amy K. Wolfe Rick Diamond Christopher Payne Jerry Dion January 2011 (Updated June 2013) Federal Energy Management Program U.S. Department of Energy DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge. Web site http://www.osti.gov/bridge Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source. National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road

413

2009 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect

This annual report includes: a brief overview of Western; some of our major achievements in FY 2009; FY 2009 customer Integrated Resource Planning, or IRP, survey; and financial data.

none,

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

2010 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect

This annual report includes: an overview of Western; approaches for future hydropower and transmission service; major achievements in FY 2010; FY 2010 customer Integrated Resource Planning, or IRP, survey; and financial data.

none,

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

EIS-0026: Annual Mitigation Report | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

026: Annual Mitigation Report EIS-0026: Annual Mitigation Report Waste Isolation Pilot Plant The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Mitigation Action Plan was prepared to address...

416

Data Management Group Annual Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Data Management Group Annual Report 1997 #12;Data Management Group Annual Report 1997 A co-operative project that is jointly funded by members of the Toronto Area Transportation Planning Data Collection: (416) 978-3941 #12;Data Management Group 1997 Annual Report Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION

Toronto, University of

417

Proceedings of the 22nd Annual DoD/DOE Seismic Research Symposium: Planning for Verification of and Compliance with the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT)  

SciTech Connect

These proceedings contain papers prepared for the 22nd Annual DoD/DOE Seismic Research Symposium: Planning for Verification of and Compliance with the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), held 13-15 September 2000 in New Orleans, Louisiana. These papers represent the combined research related to ground-based nuclear explosion monitoring funded by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), Air Force Technical Applications Center (AFTAC), Department of Defense (DoD), US Army Space and Missile Defense Command, Defense Special Weapons Agency (DSWA), and other invited sponsors. The scientific objectives of the research are to improve the United States capability to detect, locate, and identify nuclear explosions. The purpose of the meeting is to provide the sponsoring agencies, as well as potential users, an opportunity to review research accomplished during the preceding year and to discuss areas of investigation for the coming year. For the researchers, it provides a forum for the exchange of scientific information toward achieving program goals, and an opportunity to discuss results and future plans. Paper topics include: seismic regionalization and calibration; detection and location of sources; wave propagation from source to receiver; the nature of seismic sources, including mining practices; hydroacoustic, infrasound, and radionuclide methods; on-site inspection; and data processing.

Nichols, James W., LTC [Editor

2000-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

418

16.2 - Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plans for Cost-Reimbursement, Non-Management and Operating Contracts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 16.2 (July 2012) Chapter 16.2 (July 2012) 1 Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plans for Cost-Reimbursement, Non- Management and Operating Contracts [Reference: FAR 6, FAR 16, FAR 22, FAR 32, FAR 46, DEAR 915.404-4-72, DEAR 916.405-2, DEAR 970.1504-1, and Acquisition Guide Chapter 16.1] Overview The policy of the DOE is to maximize contractor performance and to align costs with performance through the use of performance-based management as a strategic contract management tool to plan for, manage, and evaluate contractor performance. An important function of contract administration is the ability, or the opportunity, to manage the environment within which the contracted effort is proceeding and, most importantly, to facilitate adjustments to that effort to meet the demand and changes as

419

Performance Demonstration Program Plan for Nondestructive Assay of Boxed Wastes for the TRU Waste Characterization Program  

SciTech Connect

The Performance Demonstration Program (PDP) for nondestructive assay (NDA) consists of a series of tests to evaluate the capability for NDA of transuranic (TRU) waste throughout the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. Each test is termed a PDP cycle. These evaluation cycles provide an objective measure of the reliability of measurements obtained from NDA systems used to characterize the radiological constituents of TRU waste. The primary documents governing the conduct of the PDP are the Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WAC; DOE 1999a) and the Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD; DOE 1999b). The WAC requires participation in the PDP; the PDP must comply with the QAPD and the WAC. The WAC contains technical and quality requirements for acceptable NDA. This plan implements the general requirements of the QAPD and applicable requirements of the WAC for the NDA PDP for boxed waste assay systems. Measurement facilities demonstrate acceptable performance by the successful testing of simulated waste containers according to the criteria set by this PDP Plan. Comparison among DOE measurement groups and commercial assay services is achieved by comparing the results of measurements on similar simulated waste containers reported by the different measurement facilities. These tests are used as an independent means to assess the performance of measurement groups regarding compliance with established quality assurance objectives (QAOs). Measurement facilities must analyze the simulated waste containers using the same procedures used for normal waste characterization activities. For the boxed waste PDP, a simulated waste container consists of a modified standard waste box (SWB) emplaced with radioactive standards and fabricated matrix inserts. An SWB is a waste box with ends designed specifically to fit the TRUPACT-II shipping container. SWBs will be used to package a substantial volume of the TRU waste for disposal. These PDP sample components are distributed to the participating measurement facilities that have been designated and authorized by the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO). The NDA Box PDP materials are stored at these sites under secure conditions to protect them from loss, tampering, or accidental damage. Using removable PDP radioactive standards, isotopic activities in the simulated waste containers are varied to the extent possible over the range of concentrations anticipated in actual waste characterization situations. Manufactured matrices simulate expected waste matrix configurations and provide acceptable consistency in the sample preparation process at each measurement facility. Analyses that are required by the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) to demonstrate compliance with various regulatory requirements and that are included in the PDP may only be performed by measurement facilities that demonstrate acceptable performance in the PDP. These analyses are referred to as WIPP analyses, and the wastes on which they are performed are referred to as WIPP wastes in this document.

Carlsbad Field Office

2001-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

420

Federal Facility Agreement Annual Progress Report for FY 1998  

SciTech Connect

This FFA Annual Progress Report has been developed to summarize the information for activities performed during the Fiscal Year 1998 (October 1, 1997, to September 30, 1998) and activities planned for Fiscal Year 1999 by U.S. EPA, SCDHEC, and SRS at those units and areas identified for remediation in the Agreement.

Palmer, E.

1999-08-04T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Annual Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Occupational Radiation Exposure Occupational Radiation Exposure Home Welcome What's New Register Dose History Request Data File Submittal REMS Data Selection HSS Logo Annual Reports User Survey on the Annual Report Please take the time to complete a survey on the Annual Report. Your input is important to us! The 2012 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2011 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2010 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2009 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2008 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2007 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2006 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2005 Annual Report

422

Test plan for evaluating the operational performance of the prototype nested, fixed-depth fluidic sampler  

SciTech Connect

The PHMC will provide Low Activity Wastes (LAW) tank wastes for final treatment by a privatization contractor from two double-shell feed tanks, 241-AP-102 and 241-AP-104. Concerns about the inability of the baseline ''grab'' sampling to provide large volume samples within time constraints has led to the development of a nested, fixed-depth sampling system. This sampling system will provide large volume, representative samples without the environmental, radiation exposure, and sample volume impacts of the current base-line ''grab'' sampling method. A plan has been developed for the cold testing of this nested, fixed-depth sampling system with simulant materials. The sampling system will fill the 500-ml bottles and provide inner packaging to interface with the Hanford Sites cask shipping systems (PAS-1 and/or ''safe-send''). The sampling system will provide a waste stream that will be used for on-line, real-time measurements with an at-tank analysis system. The cold tests evaluate the performance and ability to provide samples that are representative of the tanks' content within a 95 percent confidence interval, to sample while mixing pumps are operating, to provide large sample volumes (1-15 liters) within a short time interval, to sample supernatant wastes with over 25 wt% solids content, to recover from precipitation- and settling-based plugging, and the potential to operate over the 20-year expected time span of the privatization contract.

REICH, F.R.

1999-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

423

National cyber defense high performance computing and analysis : concepts, planning and roadmap.  

SciTech Connect

There is a national cyber dilemma that threatens the very fabric of government, commercial and private use operations worldwide. Much is written about 'what' the problem is, and though the basis for this paper is an assessment of the problem space, we target the 'how' solution space of the wide-area national information infrastructure through the advancement of science, technology, evaluation and analysis with actionable results intended to produce a more secure national information infrastructure and a comprehensive national cyber defense capability. This cybersecurity High Performance Computing (HPC) analysis concepts, planning and roadmap activity was conducted as an assessment of cybersecurity analysis as a fertile area of research and investment for high value cybersecurity wide-area solutions. This report and a related SAND2010-4765 Assessment of Current Cybersecurity Practices in the Public Domain: Cyber Indications and Warnings Domain report are intended to provoke discussion throughout a broad audience about developing a cohesive HPC centric solution to wide-area cybersecurity problems.

Hamlet, Jason R.; Keliiaa, Curtis M.

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

424

Handbook for Planning and Conducting Charrettes for High-Performance Projects  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this handbook is to furnish guidance for planning and conducting a"high-performance building" charrette, sometimes called a"greening charrette." The handbook answers typical questions that will arise, such as"What is a charrette?""Why conduct a charrette?""What topics should we cover during the charrette?" and"Whom should we invite?" It also contains samples of agendas, invitation letters, and other commonly used charrette materials. This handbook also outlines the characteristics of a good charrette facilitator. It gives suggestions for the types of experts to invite to the event to motivate participants and answer their questions. The handbook includes sample presentations that can be used by these experts to ensure they address the required technical content. It suggests the types of participants, including technical, political, and community representatives, to invite to the charrette. It offers advice for forming effective breakout groups to ensure that a broad range of complementary expertise is represented in each group. We have also included guidance on how best to include key decision makers and stakeholders who are able to attend only portions of the event.

Lindsey, G.; Todd, J. A.; Hayter, S. J.

2003-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

ANNUAL FUNDING NOTICE for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HRD-BEN-2013-0029 HRD-BEN-2013-0029 Date: April 30, 2013 To: All Plan Participants From: SRNS Benefits Administration Re: Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC Multiple Employer Pension Plan Funding Notices Attached is the pension plan notice of which the wording is very closely regulated by the federal government. Therefore, we are providing a quick overview of the notice here. 2012 Annual Funding Notice: The government previously required the distribution of an abbreviated form of this information and called it the Summary Annual Report (SAR). You may have seen SARs from previous years posted on the SRS Intranet "InSite". The enhanced version of that

426

ANNUAL FUNDING NOTICE for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HRD-BEN-2012-0038 HRD-BEN-2012-0038 Date: April 30, 2012 To: All Plan Participants From: SRNS Benefits Administration Re: Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC Multiple Employer Pension Plan Funding Notices Attached are three pension plan notices of which the wording is very closely regulated by the federal government. Therefore, we are providing a quick overview of the notices here. 2011 Annual Funding Notice: The government previously required the distribution of an abbreviated form of this information and called it the Summary Annual Report (SAR). You may have seen SARs from previous years posted on the SRS Intranet "InSite". The enhanced version of that SAR is called the Annual Funding Notice. This particular notice covers the plan year 2011 and is issued after the

427

Performance-based ratemaking for electric utilities: Review of plans and analysis of economic and resource-planning issues. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

Performance-Based Ratemaking (PBR) is a form of utility regulation that strengthens the financial incentives to lower rates, lower costs, or improve nonprice performance relative traditional regulation, which the authors call cost-of-service, rate-of-return (COS/ROR) regulation. Although the electric utility industry has considerable experience with incentive mechanisms that target specific areas of performance, implementation of mechanisms that cover a comprehensive set of utility costs or services is relatively rare. In recent years, interest in PBR has increased as a result of growing dissatisfaction with COS/ROR and as a result of economic and technological trends that are leading to more competition in certain segments of the electricity industry. In addition, incentive regulation has been used with some success in other public utility industries, most notably telecommunications in the US and telecommunications, energy, and water in the United Kingdom. In this report, the authors analyze comprehensive PBR mechanisms for electric utilities in four ways: (1) they describe different types of PBR mechanisms, (2) they review a sample of actual PBR plans, (3) they consider the interaction of PBR and utility-funded energy efficiency programs, and (4) they examine how PBR interacts with electric utility resource planning and industry restructuring. The report should be of interest to technical staff of utilities and regulatory commissions that are actively considering or designing PBR mechanisms. 16 figs., 17 tabs.

Comnes, G.A.; Stoft, S.; Greene, N. [Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (United States). Energy and Environment Div.; Hill, L.J. [Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (United States). Energy and Environment Div.]|[Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States). Energy Div.

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

428

Energy Efficiency / Renewable Energy Impact in the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP), Vol. II Technical ReportAnnual Report to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Sept. 2003 to Aug. 2004  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ESL-TR-04/12-04 ENERGY EFFICIENCY / RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPACT IN THE TEXAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN (TERP) VOLUME II ? TECHNICAL REPORT Annual Report to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality September 2003 ? August 2004... Degelman, P.E. Dan Turner, Ph.D., P.E. December 2004 ENERGY SYSTEMS LABORATORY Texas Engineering Experiment Station Texas A&M University System TERP Report, Vol. II, p. 1 December 2004 Energy Systems Laboratory, Texas A...

Degelman, L. O.; Yazdani, B.; Fitzpatrick, T.; Verdict, M.; Liu, Z.; Muns, S.; Ahmad, M.; Turner, W. D.; Culp, C.; Haberl, J. S.; Bryant, J.; Baltazar-Cervantes, J. C.; Gilman, D.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

Fiscal Year 1992 Annual Operating Plan for the Geopressured-Geothermal Research Program ($4.3 Million Budget)  

SciTech Connect

This plan describes the Geopressured-Geothermal Research Program. A Geopressured well in Texas (Pleasant Bayou) will undergo a slow test and a pressure buildup test. A geopressured well in Louisiana (Gladys McCall) will be flow tested for a short period, logged, plugged and abandoned or turned over to industry early in FY 92. A second deep geopressured well in Louisiana, the Hulin Well, is being kept on standby. Related university research in geology, numerical reservoir modeling, subsidence, microseismicity, and water quality will continue, with program data reviews initiated in appropriate areas. Increased emphasis on integrated reservoir engineering will be implemented. The well activities coupled with the related university research are designed to improve the ability to forecast reservoir productive capacity, to verify the reliability of the resource as a long-term energy resource, and to determine the environmental effects of long-term production. By these means, the Geopressured-Geothermal Research Program is developing a solid technology base that private industry can use to evaluate the geopressured-geothermal resource. The Industrial Consortium for utilization of the resource will be continued. Use projects in Louisiana and Texas will be evaluated. A geopressured reservoir review will be managed by INEL. The DOE Field Office, Idaho will make preparations to complete the program. [DJE-2005

None

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

430

Achieving New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Through Integration of Low-NOx Burners with an Optimization Plan for Boiler Combustion  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Improvement Improvement Initiative (PPII) CONTACTS Brad Tomer Director Office of Major Demonstrations National Energy Technology Laboratory 3610 Collins Ferry Road P.O. Box 880 Morgantown, WV 26507-0880 304-285-4692 brad.tomer@netl.doe.gov PARTNER Sunflower Electric Power Corporation Garden City, KS Sunflower's 360 MWe Wall-fired Holcomb Station Achieving new Source PerformAnce StAndArdS (nSPS) through integrAtion of Low-no X BurnerS with An oPtimizAtion PLAn for BoiLer comBuStion (comPLeted) A unique combination of high-tech combustion modifications and sophisticated control systems was planned to be tested on a coal-fired boiler at Sunflower Electric's Holcomb Power Station in Finney County, Kansas, to demonstrate how new technology can reduce air emissions and save costs for ratepayers. However, due to larger than anticipated costs

431

Early prediction of the performance of green building projects using pre-project planning variables: data mining approaches  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Early prediction of the success of green building projects is an important and challenging issue. The aim of this study was to develop a model to predict the cost and schedule performance of green building projects based on the level of definition during the pre-project planning phase. To this end, a three-step process was proposed: pre-processing, variable selection, and prediction model construction. Data from 53 certified green buildings were used to develop the models. After balancing the data set with respect to the proportion of cases in each of the outcome categories by pre-processing, the number of input variables was reduced from 64 to 13 and 7 for cost and schedule performance prediction respectively, using the ReliefF-W variable selection method. Then, cost and schedule performance prediction models were constructed using the selected variables and four different classifiers: a support vector machine (SVM), a back-propagation neural network (BPNN), a C4.5 decision tree algorithm (C4.5), and a logistic regression (LR). The classification performance of the four models was compared to assess their applicability. The SVM models exhibited the highest accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in predicting both the cost and schedule performance of green building projects. The results of this study empirically validated that the cost and schedule performance of green building projects is highly dependent on the quality of definition in the pre-project planning phase.

Hyojoo Son; Changwan Kim

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

Performance analysis of demand planning approaches for aggregating, forecasting and disaggregating interrelated demands  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A synchronized and responsive flow of materials, information, funds, processes and services is the goal of supply chain planning. Demand planning, which is the very first step of supply chain planning, determines the effectiveness of manufacturing and logistic operations in the chain. Propagation and magnification of the uncertainty of demand signals through the supply chain, referred to as the bullwhip effect, is the major cause of ineffective operation plans. Therefore, a flexible and robust supply chain forecasting system is necessary for industrial planners to quickly respond to the volatile demand. Appropriate demand aggregation and statistical forecasting approaches are known to be effective in managing the demand variability. This paper uses the bivariate VAR(1) time series model as a study vehicle to investigate the effects of aggregating, forecasting and disaggregating two interrelated demands. Through theoretical development and systematic analysis, guidelines are provided to select proper demand planning approaches. A very important finding of this research is that disaggregation of a forecasted aggregated demand should be employed when the aggregated demand is very predictable through its positive autocorrelation. Moreover, the large positive correlation between demands can enhance the predictability and thus result in more accurate forecasts when statistical forecasting methods are used.

Argon Chen; Jakey Blue

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

433

INL Site FY 2010 Executable Plan for Energy and Transportation Fuels Management with the FY 2009 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect

It is the policy of the Department of Energy (DOE) that sustainable energy and transportation fuels management will be integrated into DOE operations to meet obligations under Executive Order (EO) 13423 "Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management," the Instructions for Implementation of EO 13423, as well as Guidance Documents issued in accordance thereto and any modifcations or amendments that may be issued from time to time. In furtherance of this obligation, DOE established strategic performance-based energy and transportation fuels goals and strategies through the Transformational Energy Action Management (TEAM) Initiative, which were incorporated into DOE Order 430.2B "Departmental Energy, Renewable energy, and Transportation Management" and were also identified in DOE Order 450.1A, "Environmental Protection Program." These goals and accompanying strategies are to be implemented by DOE sites through the integration of energy and transportation fuels management into site Environmental Management Systems (EMS).

Ernest L. Fossum

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

National Aeronautics and Space Administration -1 NASA 2012 Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

-performance sustainable buildings; · utilize power management options and reduce the number of Agency data centers

Waliser, Duane E.

435

2011 Annual Summary Report for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada: Review of the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses  

SciTech Connect

The Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site (National Security Technologies, LLC, 2007a) requires an annual review to assess the adequacy of the Performance Assessments (PAs) and Composite Analyses (CAs), with the results submitted annually to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management. The Disposal Authorization Statements for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) also require that such reviews be made and that secondary or minor unresolved issues be tracked and addressed as part of the maintenance plan (DOE, 1999a; 2000). The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office performed an annual review of the Area 3 and Area 5 RWMS PAs and CAs for fiscal year (FY) 2011. This annual summary report presents data and conclusions from the FY 2011 review, and determines the adequacy of the PAs and CAs. Operational factors (e.g., waste forms and containers, facility design, and waste receipts), closure plans, monitoring results, and research and development (R and D) activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the PAs. Likewise, the environmental restoration activities at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) (formerly the Nevada Test Site) relevant to the sources of residual radioactive material that are considered in the CAs, the land-use planning, and the results of the environmental monitoring and R and D activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the CAs. Important developments in FY 2011 include the following: (1) Operation of a new shallow land disposal unit and a new Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)-compliant lined disposal unit at the Area 5 RWMS; (2) Development of new closure inventory estimates based on disposals through FY 2011; (3) Evaluation of new or revised waste streams by special analysis; (4) Development of version 2.102 of the Area 3 RWMS GoldSim PA model; and (5) Development of version 4.113 of the Area 5 RWMS GoldSim PA model. Analysis of the latest available data using the Area 5 RWMS v4.113 GoldSim PA model indicates that all performance objectives can be met. The results and conclusions of the Area 5 RWMS PA are judged valid, and there is no need to the revise the PA. The Area 3 RWMS has been in inactive status since July 1, 2006, with the last shipment received in April 2006. In FY 2011, there were no operational changes, monitoring results, or R and D results for the Area 3 RWMS that would impact PA validity. Despite the increase in waste volume and inventory at the Area 3 RWMS since 1996 when the PA was approved, the facility performance evaluated with the Area 3 RWMS PA GoldSim model, version 2.0 (with the final closure inventory), remains well below the performance objectives set forth in U.S. Department of Energy Order DOE O 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management' (DOE, 2001). The conclusions of the Area 3 RWMS PA remain valid. A special analysis was prepared to update the PA and CA results for the Area 3 RWMS in FY 2011. Release of the special analysis is planned for FY 2012. The continuing adequacy of the CAs was evaluated with the new models, and no significant changes that would alter CA results or conclusions were found. Inclusion of the Frenchman Flat Underground Test Area (UGTA) results in the Area 5 RWMS CA is scheduled for FY 2016, pending the completion of the closure report for the Frenchman Flat UGTA corrective action unit (CAU) in FY 2015. An industrial site, CAU 547, with corrective action sites near the Area 3 RWMS was found to have a significant plutonium inventory in 2009. CAU 547 will be evaluated for inclusion of future revisions or updates of the Area 3 RWMS CA. The revision of the Area 3 RWMS CA, which will include the UGTA source terms, is expected in FY 2024, following the completion of the Yucca Flat CAU Corrective Action Decision Document, scheduled for FY 2023. Near-term R and D efforts will focus on continuing development of the Are

NSTec Environmental Management

2012-03-20T23:59:59.000Z

436

2010 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and 0 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template 2010 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template The Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Order, DOE 0 426.1, requires that managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Memo and Workforce Analysis Guidance for FR, SSO, STSM & TQP Template-2010.docx Description TEMPLATE More Documents & Publications 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Carlsbad Field

437

2012 Annual Summary Report for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada: Review of the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses  

SciTech Connect

The Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site (National Security Technologies, LLC 2007a) requires an annual review to assess the adequacy of the performance assessments (PAs) and composite analyses (CAs), with the results submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management. The Disposal Authorization Statements for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) also require that such reviews be made and that secondary or minor unresolved issues be tracked and addressed as part of the maintenance plan (DOE 1999a, 2000). The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office performed an annual review of the Area 3 and Area 5 RWMS PAs and CAs for fiscal year (FY) 2012. This annual summary report presents data and conclusions from the FY 2012 review, and determines the adequacy of the PAs and CAs. Operational factors (e.g., waste forms and containers, facility design, and waste receipts), closure plans, monitoring results, and research and development (R&D) activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the PAs. Likewise, the environmental restoration activities at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) relevant to the sources of residual radioactive material that are considered in the CAs, the land-use planning, and the results of the environmental monitoring and R&D activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the CAs. Important developments in FY 2012 include the following: ? Release of a special analysis for the Area 3 RWMS assessing the continuing validity of the PA and CA ? Development of a new Area 5 RWMS closure inventory estimate based on disposals through FY 2012 ? Evaluation of new or revised waste streams by special analysis ? Development of version 4.114 of the Area 5 RWMS GoldSim PA model The Area 3 RWMS has been in inactive status since July 1, 2006, with the last shipment received in April 2006. The FY 2012 review of operations, facility design, closure plans, monitoring results, and R&D results for the Area 3 RWMS indicates no changes that would impact PA validity. A special analysis using the Area 3 RWMS v2.102 GoldSim PA model was prepared to update the PA results for the Area 3 RWMS in FY 2012. The special analysis concludes that all performance objectives can be met and the Area 3 RWMS PA remains valid. There is no need to the revise the Area 3 RWMS PA. Review of Area 5 RWMS operations, design, closure plans, monitoring results, and R&D activities indicates no significant changes other than an increase in the inventory disposed. The FY 2012 PA results, generated with the Area 5 RWMS v4.114 GoldSim PA model, indicate that there continues to be a reasonable expectation of meeting all performance objectives. The results and conclusions of the Area 5 RWMS PA are judged valid, and there is no need to the revise the PA. A review of changes potentially impacting the CAs indicates that no significant changes occurred in FY 2012. The continuing adequacy of the CAs was evaluated with the new models, and no significant changes that would alter CA results or conclusions were found. The revision of the Area 3 RWMS CA, which will include the Underground Test Area source term (Corrective Action Unit [CAU] 97), is scheduled for FY 2024, following the completion of the Yucca Flat CAU 97 Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan in FY 2016. Inclusion of the Frenchman Flat CAU 98 results in the Area 5 RWMS CA is scheduled for FY 2016, pending the completion of the CAU 98 closure report in FY 2015. Near-term R&D efforts will focus on continuing development of the Area 3 and Area 5 RWMS GoldSim PA/CA and inventory models.

Shott, G. [National Security Technologies, LLC

2013-03-18T23:59:59.000Z

438

Planned or experience-based processes for eco-design innovation: exploring product development driven by environmental performance targets  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Eco-design research suggests that environmental considerations should be integrated with product development with no or only minor changes to existing development processes. These processes are expected to be systematic, predictable and thoroughly planned. This paper explores if this assumption is still valid when requirements on environmental performance call for more innovative product development. An analytic model is derived from innovation management literature and used to analyse the development of a new industrial gas turbine, a project for which challenging emission level targets meant that new combustion technology had to be applied. The main conclusion is that the application of new technology is followed by changes of the development process, meaning that development becomes guided by real-time experiences rather than by formal plans.

Thomas Magnusson; Glenn Johansson

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Status Update on Action 2c: Criteria Review and Approach Document (CRAD) for Performing Assessments of Activity-level Work Planning and Control  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Slide Presentation by Bradley K. Davy, Director, Office of Worker Safety and Health Assistance, HS. Criteria Review and Approach Document (CRAD) for Performing Assessments of Activity- Level Work Planning and Control. DOE CRAD Development Approach.

440

Performance measures for urban trails: Minneapolis, MN  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

breaks. 4. Design monitoring systems that separate bikes/peds. 5. How best to integrate to planning (i Monitoring Guide (2013) 2 #12;· Objective: two key performance measures ­ Average annual daily traffic (AADT in Nonmotorized Monitoring ­ Traffic variability, technology, resources FHWA Traffic Monitoring Guide 3 #12

Minnesota, University of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

High Performance, Low Cost Hydrogen Generation from Renewable Energy - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Dr. Katherine Ayers (Primary Contact), Andy Roemer Proton Energy Systems d/b/a Proton OnSite 10 Technology Drive Wallingford, CT 06492 Phone: (203) 678-2190 Email: kayers@protononsite.com DOE Managers HQ: Erika Sutherland Phone: (202) 586-3152 Email: Erika.Sutherland@ee.doe.gov GO: Dave Peterson Phone: (720) 356-1747 Email: David.Peterson@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE000276 Subcontractors: * Entegris, Inc., Chaska, MN * The Electrochemical Engine Center at Penn State, University Park, PA * Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN Project Start Date: September 1, 2009

442

Performance model and annual yield comparison of parabolic-trough solar thermal power plants with either nitrogen or synthetic oil as heat transfer fluid  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract The majority of commercial parabolic-trough plants in the world operate with synthetic oil as heat transfer fluid in the solar field. However, the synthetic oils that are available at affordable cost present some challenges such as their flammability, environmental toxicity and a temperature limitation of around 400C. As alternative, this work proposes the use of pressurized nitrogen as heat transfer fluid. In order to analyze the feasibility of this technology, a comparison between a plant with nitrogen and a conventional plant with synthetic oil has been carried out. In both cases, 50MWe parabolic-trough plants with 6h of thermal storage are used as reference. A performance model including the solar field, the thermal storage system and the power block has been developed for each plant in the TRNSYS simulation software. This paper also describes the specifications, design and sizing of the solar field and explains the basic operation strategy applied in each model. Both annual simulations have been performed considering the same location, Almera (Spain), and meteorological data. In summary, the results show that similar net annual electricity productions can be attained for parabolic-trough plants with the same collection area using either nitrogen or synthetic oil as heat transfer fluid.

Mario Biencinto; Lourdes Gonzlez; Eduardo Zarza; Luis E. Dez; Javier Muoz-Antn

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

Environmental Performance Report 2013: Annual Site Environmental Report per the U.S. Department of Energy Order 231.1-1B (Management Publication)  

SciTech Connect

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL's) Environmental Performance Report provides a description of the laboratory's environmental management activities for 2013, including information on environmental and sustainability performance, environmental compliance activities and status, and environmental protection programs, highlights, and successes. The purpose of this report is to ensure that U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the public receive timely, accurate information about events that have affected or could adversely affect the health, safety, and security of the public or workers; the environment; or the operations of DOE facilities. This report meets the requirements of the Annual Site Environmental Report and is prepared in accordance with the DOE Order 231.1B, Environment, Safety and Health Reporting.

Schlomberg, K.; Eickhoff, J.; Beatty, B.; Braus, G.; Durbin, L.; Fiehweg, R.; Ray, M.; Ryon, T.; Schmitz, E.

2014-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

State of Indiana/GICC Alternative Fuels Implementation Plan ...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

State of IndianaGICC Alternative Fuels Implementation Plan State of IndianaGICC Alternative Fuels Implementation Plan 2010 DOE Vehicle Technologies and Hydrogen Programs Annual...

445

Hybrid principal component analysis and support vector machine model for predicting the cost performance of commercial building projects using pre-project planning variables  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

An accurate prediction of project performance in the pre-project planning stage especially prediction of cost performance is paramount to project stakeholders. The aim of this study is to propose and validate a hybrid predictive model for cost performance of commercial building projects using 64 variables related to the levels of definition in the pre-project planning stage. The proposed model integrates a support vector regression (SVR) model with principal component analysis (PCA). The proposed method was analyzed and validated based on 84 sets of data from an equal number of commercial building projects. Additionally, the result obtained using the proposed PCASVR model was compared with four other data-mining techniques. Experimental results revealed that the proposed PCASVR model is able to predict with high accuracy the cost performance of commercial building projects in the pre-project planning stage and is more efficient than the other four models.

Hyojoo Son; Changmin Kim; Changwan Kim

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

446

Comparison of Annual Growth Rates for Economic Drivers 5th and 6th Plan Period ( draft) Oregon Washington Idaho Montana Regional  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.2% 1.4% 1.3% (Number of Multi Family 1.7% 1.8% 1.6% 1.5% 2.2% 2.1% 2.0% 2.1% 1.7% 1.6% household stock Washington Idaho Montana Regional Sector Business/Building t2005-2025 2010-2030 2005-2025 2010-2030 2005 5th Plan 6th Plan 5th Plan 6th Plan Residential Single Family 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 1.1% 2.1% 2.0% 1.2% 1

447

HR & Equity Annual Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Performance Indicators ------- 28 Radiation Protection Service Ionizing Radiation ------------------------------------------------ 9 Leadership and Succession Planning ------------------------------ 10 Development and Learning ----------------------------------------------- 29 Non-Ionizing Radiation ----------------------------------------- 30 Biosafety Training

Sun, Yu

448

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Facility Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject

449

Scale Matters: An Action Plan for Realizing Sector-Wide"Zero-Energy" Performance Goals in Commercial Buildings  

SciTech Connect

It is widely accepted that if the United States is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions it must aggressively address energy end use in the building sector. While there have been some notable but modest successes with mandatory and voluntary programs, there have also been puzzling failures to achieve expected savings. Collectively, these programs have not yet reached the majority of the building stock, nor have they yet routinely produced very large savings in individual buildings. Several trends that have the potential to change this are noteworthy: (1) the growing market interest in 'green buildings' and 'sustainable design', (2) the major professional societies (e.g. AIA, ASHRAE) have more aggressively adopted significant improvements in energy efficiency as strategic goals, e.g. targeting 'zero energy', carbon-neutral buildings by 2030. While this vision is widely accepted as desirable, unless there are significant changes to the way buildings are routinely designed, delivered and operated, zero energy buildings will remain a niche phenomenon rather than a sector-wide reality. Toward that end, a public/private coalition including the Alliance to Save Energy, LBNL, AIA, ASHRAE, USGBC and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) are developing an 'action plan' for moving the U.S. commercial building sector towards zero energy performance. It addresses regional action in a national framework; integrated deployment, demonstration and R&D threads; and would focus on measurable, visible performance indicators. This paper outlines this action plan, focusing on the challenge, the key themes, and the strategies and actions leading to substantial reductions in GHG emissions by 2030.

Selkowitz, Stephen; Selkowitz, Stephen; Granderson, Jessica; Haves, Philip; Mathew, Paul; Harris, Jeff

2008-06-16T23:59:59.000Z

450

NNSA Strategic Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) FOR MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF Los Alamos National Security, LLC Contract Number: DE-AC52-06NA25396 Performance period: October 01, 2012 through September 30, 2013 Director ~;!;tory '1'/r/;L Steven K. Shook Date Chief, Prime Contracts Office Los Alamos National Laboratory Kevin W. Smith Manager Los Alamos Site Office :dd:.- Date 7J~;i;curity Ad~i]~/2-- Robert M. Poole Date Contracting Officer Los Alamos Site Office National Nuclear Security Administration INTRODUCTION The Los Alamos National Laboratory is managed by Los Alamos National Security,LLC, herein referenced as "Contractor", for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Contract, and Clause H-12,

451

Exposure Control Plan Bloodborne Pathogen Program  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) will review and revise the Plan annually in accordance with the current OSHA BBP Standard. 2. OCCUPATIONAL. The Standard requires employers to develop and implement a written Exposure Control Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provisions of the Standard. The Exposure Control Plan is contained in the Laboratory Safety Manual

Natelson, Douglas

452

Energy conservation and CO2 emission reduction in China's 11th Five-Year Plan: A performance evaluation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract In the 11th Five-Year Plan (FYP) (20052010), the Chinese Government initiated a series of energy-saving and emission reduction policies in many key fields in response to environmental pollution and climate change. This paper quantitatively evaluates the performance of energy conservation and CO2 emission reduction in this period, the impact of these policies and potentials, by integrating the contributions of energy conversion efficiency and energy utilization efficiency improvement, industrial restructuring, fuel mix shift and renewable energy development in a unified framework, as a first attempt to introduce energy conversion efficiency improvement into a decomposition approach. Comprehensive and specific policies are summarized as a policy list to be investigated. The results show that energy intensity and conversion efficiency effects were mainly responsible for driving down energy consumption, by 637.4Mtce and 85.4Mtce respectively, and they reduced CO2 emissions by 1345.3Mt and 243.8Mt respectively due to a significant improvement in the 11th FYP period. Most of the contributions made by the conversion efficiency effect (94%) come from thermal power generation, and the emission coefficient effect reduced CO2 emissions by 17.4Mt through developing renewable energy. Economic growth is still the biggest driver of energy consumption and increasing emissions, while industrial restructuring and fuel mix shift effects contributed relatively little. Developing renewable energy and promoting economic restructuring to limit the increase of energy-intensive sectors are still the main challenges and the next policy focus to achieve the targets for energy saving and carbon emission reduction in the 12th Five-Year Plan.

Jin-Hua Xu; Ying Fan; Song-Min Yu

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Simulation studies to evaluate the effect of fracture closure on the performance of naturally fractured reservoirs. Annual report  

SciTech Connect

The first of a three-year research program to evaluate the effect of fracture closure on the recovery of oil and gas from naturally fractured reservoirs has been completed. The objectives of the study are to (1) evaluate the reservoir conditions where fracture closure is significant, and (2) evaluate innovative fluid injection techniques capable of maintaining pressure within the reservoir. Simulation studies were conducted with a dual porosity simulator capable of simulating the performance of vertical and horizontal wells. Each simulator was initialized using properties typical of the Austin Chalk reservoir in Pearsall Field, Texas. Simulations of both vertical and horizontal well performance were made assuming that fracture permeability was insensitive to pressure change. Sensitivity runs indicate that the simulator is predicting the effects of critical reservoir parameters in a logical and consistent manner. The results to-date confirm that horizontal wells can increase both oil recovery rate and total oil recovery from naturally fractured reservoirs. The year one simulation results will provide the baseline for the ongoing study which will evaluate the performance degradation caused by the sensitivity of fracture permeability to pressure change, and investigate fluid injection pressure maintenance as a means to improve oil recovery performance. The study is likely to conclude that fracture closure decreases oil recovery and that pressure support achieved through fluid injection could be beneficial in improving recovery.

Not Available

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the NTS  

SciTech Connect

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Manual M 435.1-1 requires that performance assessments (PAs) and composite analyses (CAs) for low-level waste (LLW) disposal facilities be maintained by the field offices. This plan describes the activities performed to maintain the PA and the CA for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). This plan supersedes the Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site (DOE/NV/11718--491-REV 1, dated September 2002). The plan is based on U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1 (DOE, 1999a), DOE Manual M 435.1-1 (DOE, 1999b), the DOE M 435.1-1 Implementation Guide DOE G 435.1-1 (DOE, 1999c), and the Maintenance Guide for PAs and CAs (DOE, 1999d). The plan includes a current update on PA/CA documentation, a revised schedule, and a section on Quality Assurance.

Vefa Yucel

2007-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

455

2005 Annual Report: A Path to the Future  

SciTech Connect

This annual report includes: a brief overview of Western; FY 2005 accomplishments; FY 2005 Integrated Resource Planning, or IRP, summary; and financial data.

none,

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

Annual Capital Expenditures Survey | Data.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Capital Expenditures Survey Annual Capital Expenditures Survey BusinessUSA Data/Tools Apps Challenges Let's Talk BusinessUSA You are here Data.gov » Communities » BusinessUSA » Data Annual Capital Expenditures Survey Dataset Summary Description Provides national estimates of investment in new and used buildings and other structures, machinery, and equipment by U.S. nonfarm businesses with and without employees. Data are published by industry for companies with employees for NAICS 3-digit and selected 4-digit industries. Data on the amount of business expenditures for new plant and equipment and measures of the stock of existing facilities are critical to evaluate productivity growth, the ability of U.S. business to compete with foreign business, changes in industrial capacity, and measures of overall economic performance. In addition, ACES data provide industry analysts with capital expenditure data for market analysis, economic forecasting, identifying business opportunities and developing new and strategic plans. The ACES is an integral part of the Federal Government's effort to improve and supplement ongoing statistical programs. Private companies and organizations,, educators and students, and economic researchers use the survey results for analyzing and conducting impact evaluations on past and current economic performance, short-term economic forecasts, productivity, long-term economic growth, tax policy, capacity utilization, business fixed capital stocks and capital formation, domestic and international competitiveness trade policy, market research, and financial analysis.

457

Simulation studies to evaluate the effect of fracture closure on the performance of naturally fractured reservoirs. Annual report  

SciTech Connect

The second year of this three-year research program to evaluate the effect of fracture closure on the recovery of oil and gas from naturally fractured reservoirs has been completed. The overall objectives of the study are to: (1) evaluate the reservoir conditions where fracture closure is significant, and (2) evaluate innovative fluid injection techniques capable of maintaining pressure within the reservoir. Simulation studies have been conducted with a dual porosity simulator capable of simulating the performance of vertical and horizontal wells. Each simulation model has been initialized with properties typical of the Austin Chalk reservoir in Pearsall Field, Texas. During year one, simulations of both vertical and horizontal well performance were made assuming that fracture permeability was insensitive to pressure charge. The results confirmed that horizontal wells could increase both rate of oil recovery and total oil recovery from naturally fractured reservoirs. During the second year the performances of the same vertical and horizontal wells were evaluated with the assumption that fracture permeability was a function of reservoir pressure. This required repetition of most of the natural depletion cases simulated in year one while invoking the pressure-sensitive fracture permeability option. To investigate sensitivity to in situ stress, two stress conditions were simulated for each primary variable. The water injection cases, begun in year one, were extended to include most of the reservoir parameters investigated for natural depletion, including fracture permeability as a function of net stress and the use of horizontal wells. The results thus far confirm that pressure-sensitive fractures degrade well performance and that the degradation is reduced by water injection pressure maintenance. Furthermore, oil recovery can be significantly increased by water injection pressure maintenance.

Not Available

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

Wide-band-gap solar cells with high stabilized performance. Annual subcontract report, July 15, 1994--July 14, 1995  

SciTech Connect

This report describes work performed by Pennsylvania State University in collaboration with the NREL Wide-Band-Gap Team. The goal of this team is to develop a single-junction, wide-gap solar cell with good stabilized parameters. The objectives of the subcontract are to (1) develop a cost-effective amorphous silicon PV technology to foster a viable amorphous silicon PV industry in the US, ensuring that this industry remains a world leader in the a-Si technology; (2) help the US a-Si PV industry achieve the US DOE PV Program FY 1995 milestone of 10% stable efficiency commercial thin-film modules; (3) help the US a-Si PV industry achieve 12% stable efficiency multi-junction a-Si:H modules for large-scale utility use by the year 2005. Issues covered in this report include (1) improved understanding of stability in materials and solar cells, (2) intrinsic materials optimization, (3) solar cells optimized for intrinsic layer performance, (4) p-type layer optimization, (5) top cell interfaces, and (6) solar cell grading.

Wronski, C.R.; Collins, R.W.; Fonash, S.J. [Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (United States)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

459

2012 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Order, DOE O 426.1, requires that managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards.

460

2014 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Order, DOE O 426.1, requires that managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

2013 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Order, DOE 0 426.1, requires that managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards.

462

DOE-DARPA High-Performance Corrosion-Resistant Materials (HPCRM), Annual HPCRM Team Meeting & Technical Review  

SciTech Connect

The overall goal is to develop high-performance corrosion-resistant iron-based amorphous-metal coatings for prolonged trouble-free use in very aggressive environments: seawater & hot geothermal brines. The specific technical objectives are: (1) Synthesize Fe-based amorphous-metal coating with corrosion resistance comparable/superior to Ni-based Alloy C-22; (2) Establish processing parameter windows for applying and controlling coating attributes (porosity, density, bonding); (3) Assess possible cost savings through substitution of Fe-based material for more expensive Ni-based Alloy C-22; (4) Demonstrate practical fabrication processes; (5) Produce quality materials and data with complete traceability for nuclear applications; and (6) Develop, validate and calibrate computational models to enable life prediction and process design.

Farmer, J; Brown, B; Bayles, B; Lemieux, T; Choi, J; Ajdelsztajn, L; Dannenberg, J; Lavernia, E; Schoenung, J; Branagan, D; Blue, C; Peter, B; Beardsley, B; Graeve, O; Aprigliano, L; Yang, N; Perepezko, J; Hildal, K; Kaufman, L; Lewandowski, J; Perepezko, J; Hildal, K; Kaufman, L; Lewandowski, J; Boudreau, J

2007-09-21T23:59:59.000Z

463

Water Resources Research Center Annual Technical Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

resources management, hydrology, economics, culture, externalities Watershed planning and managementWater Resources Research Center Annual Technical Report FY 2006 #12;Introduction The University of Hawaii Water Resources Research Center, in the FY2006 reporting period, initiated three new projects

464

Annual Report 2013 NMFS IPA No. 2  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 Annual Report 2013 NMFS IPA No. 2 Chinook Salmon Bycatch Reduction Incentive Plan April 1, 2014 IPA Representative@atsea.org karl@seastateinc.com C7 Chinook IPA CP Report APRIL 2014 #12; 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

465

2011 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and 1 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template 2011 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template The Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Order, DOE 0 426.1, requires that managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Memo and Workforce Analysis Guidance for FR, SSO, STSM & TQP Template-2011.docx Description TEMPLATE More Documents & Publications 2012 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and

466

2012 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template 2012 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template The Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Order, DOE O 426.1, requires that managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Memo and Workforce Analysis Guidance for FR, SSO, STSM & TQP Template-2012.docx Description TEMPLATE More Documents & Publications 2010 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and

467

2013 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and 3 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template 2013 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template The Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Order, DOE 0 426.1, requires that managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Memo and Workforce Analysis Guidance for FR, SSO, STSM & TQP Template-2013.docx Description TEMPLATE More Documents & Publications 2012 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and

468

Colorado Water Institute Annual Technical Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Colorado Water Institute Annual Technical Report FY 2009 Colorado Water Institute Annual Technical Report FY 2009 1 #12;Introduction Water research is more pertinent than ever in Colorado. Whether of Colorado is engaged in long term water supply planning that requires information from the research

469

Management Plan Management Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

; and 5) consistency with the Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act. In addition, the management plan Plan, Management Plan Page MP­ 1 #12;Management Plan water quality standards, instream flows, privateManagement Plan Management Plan "Management and restoration programs for native salmonids have

470

INL Executable Plan  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ID-11383 ID-11383 Revision 2 INL FY 2011 Site Sustainability Plan with the FY 2010 Annual Report December 2010 (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) DOE/ID-11383 Revision 2 INL FY 2011 Site Sustainability Plan with the FY 2010 Annual Report December 2010 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy DOE Idaho Operations Office (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) INL FY 2011 Site Sustainability Plan with the FY 2010 Annual Report DOE/ID-11383 Revision 2 December 2010 Approved By: ~~~/ Jeffrey~USseau Fa~ 7 Dlte President and General Manager , - Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (This Page Intentionally Left Blank)

471

Flowchart for Post-Tenure Review annual review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on annual review (possible appeal) 1st Remediation Plan Followed Not Followed 2nd "Unsatisfactory" Rating Not Unsatisfactory Post-Tenure Review process is initiated Faculty Member's Written Response 2nd Remediation Plan1 Flowchart for Post-Tenure Review Normal annual review process 1st "Unsatisfactory" rating

Dyer, Bill

472

CIEE 1993 annual conference: Program  

SciTech Connect

The California Institute for Energy efficiency`s third annual conference highlights the results of CIEE-sponsored multiyear research in three programs: Building Energy Efficiency, Air Quality Impacts of Energy Efficiency, and End-Use Resource Planning. Results from scoping studies, Director`s discretionary research, and exploratory research are also featured.

Not Available

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

Dartmouth Biomedical Libraries Annual Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Dartmouth Biomedical Libraries Annual Report Fiscal Year 2011 Executive Summary The Biomedical a new director of the Biomedical Libraries. The Libraries' associate directors assumed the roles for the Biomedical Libraries. From planning a new space to replace Dana and Gilman, to migrating email

Myers, Lawrence C.

474

Plans and Reports | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Plans and Reports Plans and Reports The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Sustainability Performance Office (SPO) plans and reports progress on sustainability metrics set by...

475

Uranium industry annual 1998  

SciTech Connect

The Uranium Industry Annual 1998 (UIA 1998) provides current statistical data on the US uranium industry`s activities relating to uranium raw materials and uranium marketing. It contains data for the period 1989 through 2008 as collected on the Form EIA-858, ``Uranium Industry Annual Survey.`` Data provides a comprehensive statistical characterization of the industry`s activities for the survey year and also include some information about industry`s plans and commitments for the near-term future. Data on uranium raw materials activities for 1989 through 1998, including exploration activities and expenditures, EIA-estimated reserves, mine production of uranium, production of uranium concentrate, and industry employment, are presented in Chapter 1. Data on uranium marketing activities for 1994 through 2008, including purchases of uranium and enrichment services, enrichment feed deliveries, uranium fuel assemblies, filled and unfilled market requirements, and uranium inventories, are shown in Chapter 2. The methodology used in the 1998 survey, including data edit and analysis, is described in Appendix A. The methodologies for estimation of resources and reserves are described in Appendix B. A list of respondents to the ``Uranium Industry Annual Survey`` is provided in Appendix C. The Form EIA-858 ``Uranium Industry Annual Survey`` is shown in Appendix D. For the readers convenience, metric versions of selected tables from Chapters 1 and 2 are presented in Appendix E along with the standard conversion factors used. A glossary of technical terms is at the end of the report. 24 figs., 56 tabs.

NONE

1999-04-22T23:59:59.000Z

476

2014 Annual AFN Convention  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The AFN Convention is the largest representative annual gathering in the United States of any Native peoples. In addition to the memorable keynote speeches, the expert panels and special reports, the Convention features several evenings of cultural performances known as Quyana Alaska.

477

ENVIRONMENT 2006 Annual Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENT 2006 Annual Report IBM AND THE #12;Table of Contents Global Environmental Management and Management 13 International Performance Measures 13 Water Conservation 15 Climate Protection 16 on environmental protection in 1971. The policy is supported by a comprehensive global environmental management

478

Safety System Oversight Annual Award  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SAFETY SYSTEM OVERSIGHT ANNUAL AWARD PROGRAM SAFETY SYSTEM OVERSIGHT ANNUAL AWARD PROGRAM OBJECTIVE The Safety System Oversight (SSO) Annual Award is a special award designed to recognize superior or exemplary service by an employee who has performed SSO functions. This special award program has been established in accordance with the requirements of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 331.1C, Employee Performance Management and Recognition Program. SAFETY SYSTEM OVERSIGHT ANNUAL AWARD The SSO Annual Award recipient is determined by a panel representing the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer and managers from the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), the Office of Environmental Management (EM), the Office of Science (SC), and the Office of Nuclear Energy (NE). The SSO Program Manager in the Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and

479

Strategic Plan  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Strategic Plan science-innovationassetsimagesicon-science.jpg Strategic Plan x Strategic Plan Los Alamos National Laboratory Strategic Plan - 2014 (pdf) Our Strategic Plan...

480

BCP Annual Rate Process  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 BCP Annual Rate Process 2013 BCP Annual Rate Process Informal Process Rate Activity Schedule (doc) Informal Customer Meeting Thursday March 6, 2013 at 10:30 A.M. Conf Rms 3&4 Informal Customer Meeting Presentation (Pdf) PRS Executive Summary (Mar 07, 2013) (Pdf) FY2014 Final Ten Year Operating Plan PRS Executive Summary (PDF) FORM for Foreign Visits (doc) Formal Process Initial Federal Register Notice (pdf) Public Information Forum March 27,2013 at 10:30 A.M. Conf Rms3&4 Customer Meeting Presentation PIF Presentation (PPT) Presentation Details (pdf) Reclamation Fund Status Report PIF PRS Executive Summary (pdf) PIF Transcripts (PDF) Visitor Center Cost Analysis Questions - Responses Public Comment Forum April 10, 2013 at 10:30 A.M. Conf Rms3&4 PCF Transcripts Customer Letters

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual performance plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Second Annual Post Competition Accountability Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

LM has completed itssecond annual Post Competition Accountability Report - Office of Legacy Management's High Performing Organization: Fiscal Year (FY) 2013

482

Third Annual Post Competition Accountability Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

LM has completed its third annual Post Competition Accountability Report - Office of Legacy Management's High Performing Organization: Fiscal Year (FY) 2014

483

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Policy/Technical Involvement and Planning, 2001-2002 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect

The Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) is a supplementation project sponsored by the Northwest Power Planning Council (Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program 1994, Measure 7.4K). The objectives of the YKFP are: (1) to test the hypothesis that new supplementation techniques can be used in the Yakima River Basin to increase natural production and to improve harvest opportunities while maintaining the long-term genetic fitness of the wild and native salmonid populations and keeping adverse ecological interactions within acceptable limits (Yakima Fisheries Project Final Environment Impact Statement, 1996); (2) provide knowledge about the use of supplementation, so that it may be used to mitigate effects on anadromous fisheries throughout the Columbia River Basin; (3) to maintain and improve the quantity and productivity of salmon and steelhead habitat, including those areas made accessible by habitat improvements; (4) to ensure that Project implementation remains consistent with the Council's Fish and Wildlife Program; and (5) to implement the Project in a prudent and environmentally sound manner. Current YKFP operations have been designed to test the principles of supplementation (Busack et al. 1997). The Project's experimental design has focused on the following critical uncertainties affecting supplementation: (1) The survival and reproductive success of hatchery fish after release from the hatchery; (2) The impacts of hatchery fish as they interact with non-target species and stocks; and, (3) The effects of supplementation on the long-term genetic fitness of fish stocks. The YKFP endorses an adaptive management policy applied through a project management framework as described in the Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Planning Status Report (1995), Fast and Craig (1997), Clune and Dauble 1991. The project is managed by a Policy Group consisting of a representative of the Yakama Nation (YN, lead agency) and a representative of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The functions of the parties are described in an MOU between the YN and the WDFW. A Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) consisting of one representative from each management entity reports to the Policy Group and provides technical input on policy and other issues. Additional committee's, such as the Monitoring Implementation and Planning Team (MIPT), serve as the discretion of STAC. The Policy Group and STAC meet periodically (usually monthly) to conduct the business of the YKFP. Although the YKFP is an all stocks initiative (BPA 1996), most effort to date has been directed at spring chinook salmon and coho salmon. This report is a compilation of the year's activities between August 1, 2001 and July 31, 2002. All findings should be considered preliminary until data collection is completed or the information is published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Easterbrooks, John A.; Pearsons, Todd N. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

2003-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

484

Page 1 | B.A. in Dance with Concentrations in Performance, Choreography & Theory and Dance Education | Academic Plan of Study  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, Choreography & Theory Academic Plan of Study College of Arts +Architecture Department of Dance dance REQUIREMENTS Areas Credit Hours Description Pre-Major/ Prerequisites Major 53 All courses to meet requirements-level in a language in the Roman alphabet; or, must demonstrate competence at the 1202-level

Raja, Anita

485

Characterization plan for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Area-Wide Groundwater Program, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

This characterization plan has been developed as part of the U.S. Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) investigation of the Groundwater Operable Unit (GWOU) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) located near Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The first iteration of the characterization plan is intended to serve as a strategy document to guide subsequent GWOU remedial investigations. The plan provides a rationale and organization for groundwater data acquisition, monitoring, and remedial actions to be performed during implementation of environmental restoration activities associated with the ORNL GWOU. It is important to note that the characterization plan for the ORNL GWOU is not a prototypical work plan. As such, remedial investigations will be conducted using annual work plans to manage the work activities, and task reports will be used to document the results of the investigations. Sampling and analysis results will be compiled and reported annually with a review of data relative to risk (screening level risk assessment review) for groundwater. This characterization plan outlines the overall strategy for the remedial investigations and defines tasks that are to be conducted during the initial phase of investigation. This plan is presented with the understanding that more specific addenda to the plan will follow.

Not Available

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

2009 TEPP Annual Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Preparedness Program 2009 Annual Report i Preparing for Response to Incidents Involving Radiological Material in Transport The Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) provides assistance in planning and training to help responders in preparing for a radiological transportation accident. Requests for TEPP assistance and training continue to increase; however, we have also seen an increase in State and Tribal instructors that have completed the TEPP train-the-trainer portion of the Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT) assisting in or teaching within their jurisdictions. Comments received from emergency response organizations participating in those TEPP activities over the last Fiscal Year are

487

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION Plan Name: MCWAH Vision Plan [Plan # 505  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to pay for such coverage. Review this summary plan description and the documents governing the planSUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION Plan Name: MCWAH Vision Plan [Plan # 505] Plan Type: Group Vision Insurance Plan Year: July 1 ­ June 30 Employer\\Policyholder\\Plan Administrator\\Plan Sponsor: Medical College

488

Domain area planning utility (DAPU) for planning wireless battlefield networks  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

We describe the key design concepts of Domain Area Planning Utility (DAPU) developed by the PILSNER program to perform high-speed automated planning of Future Battlefield Networks (FBNs). DAPU processes multiple inputs from Resource Planning such as ...

Mariusz A. Fecko; John Unger; Sunil Samtani; Douglas Davey; Andrzej Cichocki; Bill Biagini; Paul Rego; Rick Stewart; Aristides Staikos

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

489

International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative: Annual Report 2006 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative: Annual Report 2006 The International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative (I-NERI) supports the National Energy Policy by conducting research to advance the state of nuclear science and technology in the United States. I-NERI sponsors innovative scientific and engineering research and development (R&D) in cooperation with participating countries. The research performed under the I-NERI umbrella addresses key issues affecting the future of nuclear energy and its global deployment. A link to the program can be found at the NE website. This I-NERI 2006 Annual Report serves to inform interested parties about the program's organization, progress of collaborative research projects undertaken since FY 2003, and future plans for the program. Following is an

490

Annual Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 THROUGH 09/30/2010 The following Annual Freedom of Information Act report covers the Period 10/01/2009, through 09/30/2010, as required by 5 U.S.C. 552. I. BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT 1. Kevin T. Hagerty, Director Office of Information Resources, MA-90 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 202-586-5955 Alexander Morris, FOIA Officer Sheila Jeter, FOIA/Privacy Act Specialist FOIA Office, MA-90 Office of Information Resources U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 202-586-5955 2. An electronic copy of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) report can be obtained at http://management.energy.gov/documents/annual_reports.htm. The report can then be accessed by clicking FOIA Annual Reports.

491

Uranium industry annual 1994  

SciTech Connect

The Uranium Industry Annual 1994 (UIA 1994) provides current statistical data on the US uranium industry`s activities relating to uranium raw materials and uranium marketing during that survey year. The UIA 1994 is prepared for use by the Congress, Federal and State agencies, the uranium and nuclear electric utility industries, and the public. It contains data for the 10-year period 1985 through 1994 as collected on the Form EIA-858, ``Uranium Industry Annual Survey.`` Data collected on the ``Uranium Industry Annual Survey`` (UIAS) provide a comprehensive statistical characterization of the industry`s activities for the survey year and also include some information about industry`s plans and commitments for the near-term future. Where aggregate data are presented in the UIA 1994, care has been taken to protect the confidentiality of company-specific information while still conveying accurate and complete statistical data. A feature article, ``Comparison of Uranium Mill Tailings Reclamation in the United States and Canada,`` is included in the UIA 1994. Data on uranium raw materials activities including exploration activities and expenditures, EIA-estimated resources and reserves, mine production of uranium, production of uranium concentrate, and industry employment are presented in Chapter 1. Data on uranium marketing activities, including purchases of uranium and enrichment services, and uranium inventories, enrichment feed deliveries (actual and projected), and unfilled market requirements are shown in Chapter 2.

NONE

1995-07-05T23:59:59.000Z

492

Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation Waste Integrated Performance and Safety Codes (NEAMS Waste IPSC) verification and validation plan. version 1.  

SciTech Connect

The objective of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation Waste Integrated Performance and Safety Codes (NEAMS Waste IPSC) is to provide an integrated suite of computational modeling and simulation (M&S) capabilities to quantitatively assess the long-term performance of waste forms in the engineered and geologic environments of a radioactive-waste storage facility or disposal repository. To meet this objective, NEAMS Waste IPSC M&S capabilities will be applied to challenging spatial domains, temporal domains, multiphysics couplings, and multiscale couplings. A strategic verification and validation (V&V) goal is to establish evidence-based metrics for the level of confidence in M&S codes and capabilities. Because it is economically impractical to apply the maximum V&V rigor to each and every M&S capability, M&S capabilities will be ranked for their impact on the performance assessments of various components of the repository systems. Those M&S capabilities with greater impact will require a greater level of confidence and a correspondingly greater investment in V&V. This report includes five major components: (1) a background summary of the NEAMS Waste IPSC to emphasize M&S challenges; (2) the conceptual foundation for verification, validation, and confidence assessment of NEAMS Waste IPSC M&S capabilities; (3) specifications for the planned verification, validation, and confidence-assessment practices; (4) specifications for the planned evidence information management system; and (5) a path forward for the incremental implementation of this V&V plan.

Bartlett, Roscoe Ainsworth; Arguello, Jose Guadalupe, Jr.; Urbina, Angel; Bouchard, Julie F.; Edwards, Harold Carter; Freeze, Geoffrey A.; Knupp, Patrick Michael; Wang, Yifeng; Schultz, Peter Andrew; Howard, Robert (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN); McCornack, Marjorie Turner

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

493

Software Quality Assurance Plan for GoldSim Models Supporting the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites Performance Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect

This Software Quality Assurance Plan (SQAP) applies to the development and maintenance of GoldSim models supporting the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) performance assessments (PAs) and composite analyses (CAs). Two PA models have been approved by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) as of November 2006 for the PA maintenance work undertaken by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec). NNSA/NSO asked NSTec to assume the custodianship of the models for future development and maintenance. The models were initially developed by Neptune and Company (N&C).

Gregory J. Shott, Vefa Yucel

2007-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

494

Scale Matters: An Action Plan for Realizing Sector-Wide "Zero-Energy" Performance Goals in Commercial Buildings  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

available from authors. DOE EERE. High Performance BuildingsProgram: Building Database. DOE EERE; August Available from:buildings/database/. DOE EERE. State Energy Alternatives:

Selkowitz, Stephen

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

495

2013 Annual DOE-NE Materials Research Coordination Meeting | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 Annual DOE-NE Materials Research Coordination Meeting 2013 Annual DOE-NE Materials Research Coordination Meeting 2013 Annual DOE-NE Materials Research Coordination Meeting The Reactor Materials element of the Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies (NEET) program conducted its FY 2013 coordination meeting as a series of four web-conferences to act as a forum for the nuclear materials research community. The purpose of this meeting was to report on current and planned nuclear materials research, identify new areas of collaboration and promote greater coordination among the various Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) programs. Currently, materials research is performed in several NE programs, including NE Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS), Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD), Advanced Reactor Technologies

496

2013 Annual DOE-NE Materials Research Coordination Meeting | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 Annual DOE-NE Materials Research Coordination Meeting 2013 Annual DOE-NE Materials Research Coordination Meeting 2013 Annual DOE-NE Materials Research Coordination Meeting The Reactor Materials element of the Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies (NEET) program conducted its FY 2013 coordination meeting as a series of four web-conferences to act as a forum for the nuclear materials research community. The purpose of this meeting was to report on current and planned nuclear materials research, identify new areas of collaboration and promote greater coordination among the various Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) programs. Currently, materials research is performed in several NE programs, including NE Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS), Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD), Advanced Reactor Technologies

497

EM Updates Congress on Nuclear Cleanup Progress in 18th Annual Caucus |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM Updates Congress on Nuclear Cleanup Progress in 18th Annual EM Updates Congress on Nuclear Cleanup Progress in 18th Annual Caucus EM Updates Congress on Nuclear Cleanup Progress in 18th Annual Caucus March 1, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM and its cleanup contractors present briefings each year to the U.S. House Nuclear Cleanup Caucus on remediation operations at its major sites across the DOE complex. The briefings are organized by Rep. Doc Hastings (R-Wash.), who chairs the bipartisan caucus. For nearly two decades, the briefings have offered members of Congress and their staff, news media and other interested individuals insight into the progress of cleanup of the environmental legacy of the Cold War. EM site managers and their contractor counterparts provide updates on cleanup accomplishments, safety performance, budget scopes, cost savings and plans

498

EEO Management Plan 20072010 September 2007 1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

EEO Management Plan 2007­2010 September 2007 1 EEO Management Plan 2007-2010 Part 9A of the Anti-Discrimination Act (1977) and the Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Act 1999, the EEO Management Plan awarded annually by EOWA) CDPS Cultural Diversity Priorities Statement HRS Human Resource Services ODU

Dunstan, Neil

499

Uranium industry annual 1995  

SciTech Connect

The Uranium Industry Annual 1995 (UIA 1995) provides current statistical data on the U.S. uranium industry`s activities relating to uranium raw materials and uranium marketing. The UIA 1995 is prepared for use by the Congress, Federal and State agencies, the uranium and nuclear electric utility industries, and the public. It contains data for the period 1986 through 2005 as collected on the Form EIA-858, ``Uranium Industry Annual Survey``. Data collected on the ``Uranium Industry Annual Survey`` provide a comprehensive statistical characterization of the industry`s plans and commitments for the near-term future. Where aggregate data are presented in the UIA 1995, care has been taken to protect the confidentiality of company-specific information while still conveying accurate and complete statistical data. Data on uranium raw materials activities for 1986 through 1995 including exploration activities and expenditures, EIA-estimated reserves, mine production of uranium, production of uranium concentrate, and industry employment are presented in Chapter 1. Data on uranium marketing activities for 1994 through 2005, including purchases of uranium and enrichment services, enrichment feed deliveries, uranium fuel assemblies, filled and unfilled market requirements, uranium imports and exports, and uranium inventories are shown in Chapter 2. The methodology used in the 1995 survey, including data edit and analysis, is described in Appendix A. The methodologies for estimation of resources and reserves are described in Appendix B. A list of respondents to the ``Uranium Industry Annual Survey`` is provided in Appendix C. For the reader`s convenience, metric versions of selected tables from Chapters 1 and 2 are presented in Appendix D along with the standard conversion factors used. A glossary of technical terms is at the end of the report. 14 figs., 56 tabs.

NONE

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

500

E-Print Network 3.0 - annual implementation work Sample Search...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

specific actions identified in the annual implementation ... Source: Northwest Power Planning Council Collection: Power Transmission, Distribution and Plants 3 Support Staff...